20230410 Ver 1_Capeton_IP_031423_20230315

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
O�CARO LI NA 3040 NC 42 West, Clayton NC 27520
ECOSYSTEMS P:919-606-1065
March 13, 2023
Ms. Katharine Elks
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: Individual Permit Application
SAW-2022-00968
Capeton Development
Town of Lillington
Harnett County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Elks;
The purpose of this application is to request issuance of an Individual Permit (IP) for the Capeton
development for impacts to streams and wetlands under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act.
This letter describes the site and history, project purpose, alternatives, proposed impacts and
compensatory mitigation. Also enclosed is supporting documentation for the application
including Engineering Form 4345, Mitigation Availability Letters and Proposed Phasing, NC
Wetland Assessment Method Rating Sheets, NC Stream Assessment Method Rating Sheets,
Figures, and Engineering Site Plans and Impact Exhibits. The information provided is submitted
in conjunction with Withers & Ravenel (project engineer) on behalf of Greenfield Communities
LLC.
Site Description
The project is located on the east side of the Town of Lillington (Town), south of US-421, and
on the north bank of the Cape Fear River (Figure 1). The site comprises approximately 824
acres including approximately 2.5 miles of river front access, and over 1 mile of US-421
frontage. It lies within the Dry Creek -Cape Fear River watershed (HUC 030300040505) in the
Cape Fear River Basin. Besides the Cape Fear River (Stream Index 18-(16.7)), Dry Creek
(Stream Index 18-17-(2)) bisects the site along with another USGS mapped stream (Figures 2
and 3). The River and these tributaries are classified as Water Supply Watershed (WS-IV).
The Site consists of a mix of active farmland, maintained passive recreation area, and
woodlands. Forested areas on site consist of a variety of ages of primarily mixed hardwood
forest and timbered areas. Typical species present on the site include Quercus alba, Quercus
nigra, Carpinus caroliniana, Ligustrum sinense, and Microstegium vimineum.
The site contains approximately 84.4 acres of wetlands, 24,635 linear feet of perennial streams,
8,381 linear feet of intermittent streams, and 0.57 acres of ponds. Approximately 11,300 linear
feet of Cape Fear River frontage and 191.8 acres of FEMA regulated 100-year floodplain are
present on the site (Figure 4).

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks
Capeton Individual Permit
Regulatory History
Page 2 of 14
March 13, 2023
Initial meetings related to the project were held with the US Army Corps of Engineers and NC
Division of Water Resources on 8/26/21 and 11/16/22, and a field visit with both agencies was
held on 12/7/22. A request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was submitted on April
18, 2022. A request for a No Permit Required Determination was submitted on December 16,
2022. This document requested confirmation that initial phases of the development could begin
construction without a CWA permit. A No Permit Required Determination and Delineation
Concurrence were issued on January 31, 2023.
Parcel Numbers (ENG FORM 4345 Block 16)
Please see Table 1 below for a list of parcel numbers and owner information for all parcels
within the Site. Note that both GFC River Holdings LLC and Lillington AA Acquisitions LLC
are operated by and located at the same address as the applicant for this permit, Greenfield
Communities LLC. The Harnett County parcel is the existing pump station site which will not
be disturbed except to tie in the Site's wastewater collection infrastructure.
Table 1: Parcel Numbers
PIN
Owner Name
Acreage
0660-32-0284.000
GFC River Holdings LLC
130.97
0660-61-9572.000
GFC River Holdings LLC
163.42
0660-03-9253.000
GFC River Holdings LLC
78.56
0660-02-4375.000
GFC River Holdings LLC
56.00
0660-12-9649.000
GFC River Holdings LLC
158.12
0660-21-8598.000
Lillington AA Acquisitions LLC
31.93
0660-42-7059.000
Lillington AA Acquisitions LLC
202.09
0660-72-1109.000
Lillington AA Acquisitions LLC
0.94
0650-92-6093.000
Harnett County
3.99
Nature of Activity (ENG FORM 4345 Block 18 supplemental information)
Capeton is a mixed use, master planned development consisting of single and multi -family
housing, active adult, commercial retail and office space, civic and community areas. A portion
of the site will be dedicated as a Town park along with an easement granted for a Town
greenway with river access. The site plan (Appendix C Exhibit 1) includes approximately 2,250
residential units including single family homes, townhomes, cottages, multi -family units, and
active adult living. A grocery store and commercial area, office park, and river -view retail area
will provide a comprehensive community within walking distance from downtown Lillington
and Campbell University. Planned infrastructure will include roads, utilities (water, sewer, and
electric), connections to the proposed Town/County greenway, clubhouse/amenities centers,
open space and pocket parks, and stormwater best management practices. In total,
approximately half of the 824-acre site will be dedicated open space or donated to the Town for
passive recreation activities (Appendix C Exhibit 1). Most of the wetland areas and the 100-
year floodplain will be protected in this manner, along with riparian buffers along the Cape Fear
River and Dry Creek.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks Page 3 of 14
Capeton Individual Permit March 13, 2023
Construction of the project will involve clearing of forested areas within the limits of disturbance
and construction of road and utility infrastructure, including those proposed impacts to
jurisdictional waters as detailed below. Lot grading would follow to prepare for construction of
the residences and other buildings. Construction will be performed with standard equipment.
Initial activity would involve land clearing and grubbing, along with the installation of erosion
control measures, including silt fencing, check dams, and silt basins approved by the NC
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (NCDEMLR). This plan will include
appropriate sediment and erosion controls, a draw down and release schedule for dewatering,
sediment removal and disposal, and a grading and stabilization plan for the pond areas. Clean
fill will be placed in the permanent wetland impact areas, graded and stabilized. Stream
crossings will be accomplished via culverts as shown in the attached plans and will be
constructed in the dry using pump -around or diversions.
Project Phasing & Schedule
As depicted in the Overall Site Plan (Appendix C Exhibit 1), the site has been planned in
multiple phases including office (OF), traditional development (TR), active adult (AA),
commercial (COM), and multi -family (MF). A master site plan has been developed, and each
phase is being designed in detail. The proposed schedule of development is provided in Table 2
below.
Table 2 — Proposed Construction Schedule
Phase
Proposed Start
Proposed Complete
OF-1
2027
- 1st
Quarter
2028
- 2°d Quarter
COM-1
2024
- 3rd
Quarter
2025
- 0' Quarter
TR-1
2024
- 1st
Quarter
2025
- 2❑d Quarter
TR-2
2025-2
d
Quarter
2026-
3rd Quarter
TR-3
2025
- 2❑d
Quarter
2026
- 2❑d Quarter
TR-4
2025
- 3rd
Quarter
2026
- 0' Quarter
TR-5
2026
- 4t'
Quarter
2027
- 4t' Quarter
TR-6
2026-2
d
Quarter
2027-2
d Quarter
TR-7
2025-2
d
Quarter
2026
- 3rd Quarter
AA-1
2024
- 1 st
Quarter
2025
- 2❑d Quarter
AA-2
2026
- 3'
Quarter
2027
- 0' Quarter
AA-3
2025
- 1st
Quarter
2026
- 2°d Quarter
AA-4
2025
- 3rd
Quarter
2026
- 0' Quarter
AA-5
2027
- 2❑d
Quarter
2028
- 2❑d Quarter
MF-1
2025-2
d
Quarter
2026
- 3rd Quarter
COM-2
2024
- 2❑d
Quarter
2025
- 2nd Quarter
TR-8
2027
- 0'
Quarter
2029
- 1st Quarter
TR-9
2028
- 4t'
Quarter
2031
- 3' Quarter
TR-10
2029
- 0'
Quarter
2031-2
d Quarter
TR-11
2029
- 4t'
Quarter
2031
- Is'Quarter

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks Page 4 of 14
Capeton Individual Permit March 13, 2023
Project Purpose (ENG FORM 4345 Block 19 supplemental information)
The purpose of Capeton is to provide a mixed -use development with commercial access (US
421) and river frontage within the proximity of the Town of Lillington for future pedestrian
access. Lillington is situated on the Cape Fear River, within minutes of Campbell University,
and a short drive from the Triangle and Fayetteville NC. According to the NC Office of State
Budget and Management, Harnett County is likely to experience a 36% growth in population
between 2020 and 2040 (133,784 to 181,670). Harnett was the 121h fastest growing county in
North Carolina between 2010 and 2020. Capeton is intended to help meet this demand and
provide a comprehensive living experience with multiple residential, commercial, civic (school),
and recreational opportunities.
Project Alternatives
Alternative Locations
Due to the rather unique purpose and location of Capeton, alternative sites are not a practicable
option. Alternative sites meeting the purpose of Capeton would require:
- Reasonable pedestrian distance (2-miles) of Lillington
- River frontage for passive recreation
- US route frontage for commercial potential and traffic flow
- Large parcels rather than multiple small parcels
- No conflicting land uses (adjacent or on site)
- Limited floodplain encroachment (does not bisect the site)
- No known current occurrence of endangered/threatened species
In proximity of Lillington, the availability of land with access to both major US routes for
commercial opportunities and significant river frontage is limited. Figure 6 shows the area
around Lillington along with FEMA 100-year floodplain, major streams, and parcels.
Alternative sites are discussed below by quadrant centered on the crossing of US-401/421 over
the river.
Northeast Quadrant: This quadrant contains the Capeton site and is ideally located with frontage
on both US-421 and the river. Areas further east along the river are owned by Campbell
University or already developed, and not available for development. Further along the river
eastward is over 4-miles from Lillington and well beyond reasonable pedestrian access to the
Town.
Southeast Quadrant: Areas on the south side of the river, east of Lillington and across from the
proposed project, do not have access to major US routes and therefore do not have the potential
for commercial aspects of the planned development. The riverfront parcels have frontage on
Ross Road, a two-lane secondary road, which would likely not be able to handle the traffic
volume without significant improvements. These areas also contain multiple small parcels and
conflicting land uses including the North Harnett Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks Page 5 of 14
Capeton Individual Permit March 13, 2023
Southwest Quadrant: Areas on the south side of the river, west of Lillington, are in multiple
smaller parcels and not likely to be available as a comprehensive development unit. This area is
also separated from US 421 by numerous parcels and secondary roads, therefore without the
commercial component potential.
Northwest Quadrant: North of the river and west of Lillington there are several larger parcels
with river frontage and access to US 401. This area has multiple constraints and potential for
increased environmental impacts. The area is bisected by Neills Creek, a much larger stream than
Dry Creek, with significantly more mapped (NWI) wetlands and floodplain areas. Also, Neills
Creek is a known occurrence of the Cape Fear Shiner. A Town park is also present on the eastern
portion of the area.
Table 3*
Alternative
River
Access
US Route
Frontage
Large
Parcels
Conflict
Land Use
FEMA
Issues
Species
Issues
Northeast
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Southeast
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Southwest
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Northwest
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
*Bold result indicates meeting criteria
As seen in Table 3, the northeast quadrant, where Capeton is proposed, is the only area that
meets all the siting criteria. Other areas within this quadrant are either remote to Lillington or
part of Campbell University. Therefore, Capeton is the only practicable alternative for a project
of this nature.
Alternative Site Designs
Extensive efforts have been made from the initial site concepts and master planning to detailed
phasing and layouts to avoid and minimize impacts to Waters of the US. The proposed site
layout has minimized impacts to the greatest practicable extent. Alternative layouts providing
similar commercial, residential and recreational opportunities are not available without increased
impacts. Due to the size of the project area, site design alternatives are described by component
and concept rather than numerous alternatives with increased impacts.
Road Crossings
There are eight road crossings proposed as part of the Capeton Development. Five of these cross
stream features that bisect (Dry Creek, SP, SS, SAB) or almost bisect (SK) the property. Of
those, two (SP and SK) are being constructed using bottomless culverts as detailed in the No
Permit Required documentation. Dry Creek (Impact F) and SB (Impact J) are being crossed in
the location of existing road crossings, and SO (Impact M) is crossed where it is an intermittent
ditched feature. Stream SAB (Impact B) is being crossed in the area of least wetlands as the
existing crossing abuts the property line and cannot be used due to the turn radius required off
US-421 to access it.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks Page 6 of 14
Capeton Individual Permit March 13, 2023
Several alternatives were evaluated specifically for the crossing of Dry Creek. Extensive effort
and coordination with Colonial Pipeline was undertaken to attempt to locate the road crossing
within the gas pipeline easement. This was proven impracticable as the road surface cannot be
within the gas easement. Alternatives shifting the road north and south of the pipeline were
evaluated. A southern alignment would impact significantly more stream footage as the stream
curves back toward the north. Shifting further north than the current alignment would increase
forested wetland impacts. The creek bisects the property and has an extensive floodplain with
riparian wetlands throughout (Figure 4). Alternatives were considered but deemed impracticable
due to the aforementioned pipeline constraint. Therefore, the proposed alignment maximizes co -
location with the easement by placing the southern road fill within the easement, and the
roadway surface abutting it to the north. This centers the stream impact on a pooled area already
degraded by the existing corridor maintenance. The proposed culverts have been extended
through the gas easement as that is required by the pipeline company for maintenance.
Alternative crossing locations throughout the site would either be shifted upstream which would
generally increase wetland impacts (Dry Creek, SB, SK, SP, SS, SAB), or shifted downstream
which would generally increase stream impacts due to the deeper valleys (Dry Creek, SAB, SK,
SO, SP, SS).
An alternative road alignment for the stream SB crossing, avoiding stream SF (Impact J), was
evaluated, but this would require shifting the SB road crossing upstream from the existing road,
increasing wetland and perennial stream impacts. Since stream SF is intermittent and primarily
fed by wetland WAP, and development in that area would reroute the hydrology for its entire
drainage area, it was determined that the impacts to SF would be more practicable than increased
impacts to SB and associated wetlands.
Lot Fill/Grading
Lot fill and grading in jurisdictional waters has been limited to the greatest extent practicable.
Commercial and multi -residential areas along US-421 have been laid out to avoid most features
with the exception of minor acreage of wetland WR. Alternative layouts have been considered
but generally increased impacts due to required parking, square footage, and alignment of the
store frontage.
Residential lot fill is proposed in wetlands WAP (Impact H), WAQ (Impact G), and WAU
(Impact L) shown in Figure 5 and Appendix C, Exhibit 3. WAP is a non -riparian feature
located in the center of the site between perennial stream drainages SA and SB. Alternative
designs with less impact to wetland WAP are not practicable due to this central location.
Similarly, WAQ was initially avoided, with a road crossing below it, but its entire drainage area
would have been eliminated and routed to a stormwater pond south of the feature, potentially
draining the wetland. Therefore, lot fill is proposed in this area instead. Wetland WAU is a
minor impact of 0.01 acre permanent loss to allow perpendicular crossing of the gas pipeline.
Lots were considered in this area, but have been eliminated to minimize impacts.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks
Capeton Individual Permit
Utility Crossings
Page 7 of 14
March 13, 2023
Nine utility crossings are proposed to serve the site phases (Figure 5). The location of the
existing gravity line along Dry Creek to the pump station sets the grade at which the sewer
infrastructure must tie to, and precludes alternatives without wetland/stream crossings of this
feature. Other sewer crossings are co -located with the gas line through the site (Impact N) or
cross streams at locations with minimal wetland impacts. All impacts proposed cannot be
reduced due to the required slope of gravity lines being maintained. Locations on the upstream
side of the gas line were considered, but would result in additional wetland disturbance.
Proposed Impacts (ENG FORM 4345 Blocks 20-22)
The project will impact resources under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act Section 404 as
summarized below in Tables 4 and 5 for the construction of road and utility infrastructure,
amenities, and some lot grading. Figure 5 shows the approximate location of potential impacts to
jurisdictional features included in this application. For additional information see the attached
impact Sheets (Appendix C — Exhibit 3).
Table 4: Stream Impact Summary (linear feet)
Identifiers
Impacts
Mitigation
Site
Sheet
PJD
Temp
Permanent
Ratio*
Amount
Phase
No
Loss
Loss
Total
S1-4
B
SAB
11
12
135
147
2
270
5
S5-6
D
Dry Creek
23
21
-
21
-
-
S7-8
E
Dry Creek
23
21
-
21
-
-
S9-12
F
Dry Creek
15
200
200
2
400
5
S13-14
F
Dry Creek
21
21
-
21
-
-
S15, 17-18
J
SB
14
11
-
11
-
-
S16,19
J
SB
-
-
115
115
2
230
3
S 16,19
J
SF
-
-
266
266
1
266
3
S20-21
K
SP
22
27
-
27
-
-
S22-25
M
SQ
8
3
121
124
1
121
3
S26-27
N
SQ
28
26
-
26
-
-
S28-29
N
SR
25
25
-
25
-
-
S30-31
N
SS
21
22
-
22
-
-
S32-33
O
SS
21
22
-
22
-
-
S34-37
P
SS
8
9
191
200
2
382
2
Total
240
220
1028
1248
-
1669
*Proposed mitigation ratios based on NC SAM Ratings (Appendix A-3)

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks
Capeton Individual Permit
Page 8 of 14
March 13, 2023
Stream impacts considered temporary include construction access areas for dewatering and
erosion control. Stream impacts considered "no loss" include sewer trench areas that will be
backfilled up to bed elevation, and energy dissipater pads at the outlet of culverts that will have
rip -rap bedded into the banks and below the stream bed elevation. Permanent loss of stream
channel includes culvert construction and fill for roadways and some lots.
Table 5: Wetland Imnact Summary (acres)
Identifiers
Impacts
Mitigation
Site
Sheet
PJD
Temp
Permanent
Ratio*
Amount
Phase
No Loss
Loss
Total
WI-2
A
WM
0.012
-
0.222
0.222
2
0.444
5
W3-6
B
WM
0.015
-
0.167
0.167
2
0.334
5
W7-8
C
WM
0.134
0.133
-
0.133
1
0.133
5
W9-11
D
WM
0.040
0.039
-
0.039
1
0.039
5
W 12-14
E
WM
0.166
0.140
-
0.14
1
0.14
5
W 15-20
F
WM/N
0.060
-
0.836
0.836
2
1 1.672
5
W21-23
F
WN
0.100
0.082
-
0.082
1
0.082
5
W24
G
WAQ
-
-
0.136
0.136
2
0.272
2
W25
H
WAP
-
-
1.515
1.515
1
1.515
2
W26-27
I
WR
0.003
-
0.176
0.176
2
1 0.352
1
W28-29
I
WR
0.017
-
0.152
0.152
2
0.304
1
W30-32
J
WB
0.006
-
0.047
0.047
2
0.094
3
W33-34
K
WAK
0.026
0.024
-
0.024
1
0.024
3
W35-36
L
WU
0.003
-
0.014
0.014
2
0.028
3
W37-38
N
WAU
0.001
0.001
-
0.001
1
0.001
1
W39-40
N
WAR
0.014
0.015
-
0.015
1
0.015
1
W41-44
P
WAB/AF
0.009
-
0.096
0.096
2
0.192
2
W45-46
Q
WAH
0.029
0.056
-
1 0.056
1 1
0.056
4
Total
0.635
0.49
3.361
1 3.851
1
5.697
*Proposed mitigation ratios based on NC WAM Ratings (Appendix A-4)
Temporary wetland impacts include areas of construction access and sewer corridors that will be
returned to existing grades and stabilized at the completion of construction activities and allowed
to regenerate forest vegetation. Permanent "no loss" wetland impacts include the proposed
sewer corridors within forested wetlands that will be returned to grade but maintained as
herbaceous wetlands for maintenance access. Permanent wetland impacts include roadway and
lot fill.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks Page 9 of 14
Capeton Individual Permit March 13, 2023
Avoidance, Minimization, & Compensation (ENG FORM 4345 Block 23)
Avoidance and minimization of impacts has been achieved throughout the selection of
alternatives and the design of the project. In addition to the avoidance and minimization
described above, the following measures have been implemented in the approach to the proposed
development and impacts:
- No impacts to the floodplain or wetlands within it are proposed as part of the Capeton
development. The floodplain areas will be deeded to the Town for a passive recreation
park in the southwest or accessed via a proposed Town greenway through the site. This
greenway is part of the Town's master plan and the design and engineering is being
contracted in 2023. The preliminary route of the greenway can be constructed with no
wetland impacts and several spanned stream crossings.
- Considering that there are over 33,000 linear feet of streams (not including the Cape Fear
River) and over 84 acres of wetlands on the site, the permanent loss of Waters of the US
proposed for Capeton comprises approximately 3% of the total length of streams and 4%
of the total acreage of wetlands on the site.
- All perennial features have been avoided except for required road and utility crossings
(detailed above). Road crossings have been reduced to the least practicable number while
complying with local requirements for fire safety, access, and traffic circulation.
- Road and utility crossings, where practicable, have been co -located with the gas
transmission line to minimize impacts.
- Road crossings have been designed to be perpendicular to stream channels and located in
areas with minimal wetlands where practicable.
- Wetlands and streams not proposed to be impacted will be preserved in open space, and
lot lines will not encroach upon them.
- Nature trails throughout the open space areas will be designed to avoid wetlands, and if
stream crossings are required, they will be constructed via spanned footbridges and
natural materials.
- Retaining walls will be used to avoid impacts in areas where grading is in close proximity
to wetland features.
- Stormwater control measures, including wet ponds, energy dissipaters, and level
spreaders will be implemented to control and treat runoff from the proposed development
in accordance with Town and State regulations. Stormwater conceptual design has taken
into account the potential to drain jurisdictional features and minimized this aspect.
Compensatory mitigation for 3.36 acres of permanent wetland loss and 0.49 acre permanent
wetland conversion is proposed via a combination of the Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank for all

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks Page 10 of 14
Capeton Individual Permit March 13, 2023
riparian wetland credits and the Barra Farms H Mitigation Bank for 1.52 acres of non -riparian
wetland credits (Appendix A-2). This mitigation (5.70 acres) is summarized in Table 5 based
on a 2:1 ratio for wetland fill areas and a 1:1 ratio for the conversion of forested wetland along
maintained utility corridors. One exception is non -riparian wetland WAP (Impact H), which is
proposed as 1:1 compensation due to its NC WAM rating as Low (Appendix A-4).
Compensatory mitigation for 1,028 linear feet of stream channel loss is proposed via the Daniels
Creek Mitigation Bank. This mitigation (1,669 linear feet) is summarized in Table 4 based on a
2:1 ratio for permanent loss of perennial stream with NC SAM ratings of High, and 1:1 ratio for
permanent loss of intermittent stream with NC SAM ratings of Low (Appendix A-3). A letter of
availability for this mitigation is attached (Appendix A-2).
The compensatory mitigation detailed above is proposed to be paid in "mitigation groups"
associated with the construction phases detailed in Table 2. The mitigation groups are provided
below in Table 6 along with the Impact Number, Impact Area, Resource ID, and Mitigation
required.
Table 6: Mitigation Grouping
Phase
Stream Impacts
Linear feet (see Table 4)
Wetland Impacts
Acres (see Table 5)
No.
Potential
Date*
Permanent
Loss
Proposed
Mitigation
Permanent
Loss
Proposed
Mitigation
1
2025
0
0
0.34
0.73
2
2026
191
382
1.75
1.98
3
2027
502
617
0.09
0.15
4
2028
0
0
0.06
0.06
5
2031
335
670
1.62
2.84
Total
1028
1669
3.86
5.76
*See Exhibit 4
Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners (ENG FORM 4345 Block 25)
Please see Figure 7 and Table 7 for a list of adjacent property owners.
List of Other Certificates or Approvals (ENG FORM 4345 Block 26)
The following approvals presented in Table 8 have been received, applied for, or will be
required prior to project construction commencing in each phase.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks
Capeton Individual Permit
Table 8: List of Annrovals
Page 11 of 14
March 13, 2023
Agency
Type Approval
ID Number
Date
A lied
Date
A roved
Date
Denied
Town of Lillin ton
Conditional Use
-
6/14/21
11/18/21
N/A
Harnett County
Annexation
-
-
In progress
N/A
Town of Lillin ton
Stormwater
-
-
-
N/A
Harnett Co Regional Water
I Wastewater
-
-
-
N/A
NCDEMLR
I Erosion Control
-
-
-
N/A
Additional Information
Stormwater Management
Stormwater management on the site has been planned to comply with the project's location
within a WSW -IV watershed, and the Town's Phase II post construction stormwater program.
Due to these programs, the Town requires the treatment of the first inch of runoff from all
impervious surfaces, the peak flow managed for the 1-year and 10-year 24-hour storm events,
and project density limited to 70% with the use of Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs). To
meet these stormwater requirements, the project will utilize SCMs per the guidance in the
NCDEQ Stormwater Design Manual. Impacts to the flood fringe will be limited to preserve
natural flood zones. These impacts are largely limited to parks and trails that will utilize much of
the natural grading to limit changes in flood storage. Site stormwater management plans will be
submitted in phases to the Town for review and approval. If required, notice of these approvals
can be forwarded for your files.
Historic Preservation Act
A Phase 1 archaeological study of the entire site was performed in 2022 by Archaeological
Consultants of the Carolinas (ACC) using methodology approved by the NC State Historic
Preservation Office (NCSHPO). The initial investigation focused on three areas and identified
13 areas requiring further (Phase 2) investigation. The additional investigation was performed in
summer 2022. Upon final evaluation of the Phase 2 findings and coordination with the
NCSHPO, no Phase 3 recovery is anticipated to be required. A letter of concurrence from SHPO
is expected in March 2023.
Federal Emergency Management Act
A significant portion of the site is within the floodplain and floodway of the Cape Fear River.
No impacts to these areas are proposed for the development of Capeton. The areas dedicated to
the Town (via deed or easement) for the park and greenway may require coordination and a No
Rise Certification for minor changes to the floodplain. This will be coordinated by the Town and
their selected engineer.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks
Capeton Individual Permit
Endangered Species Act
Page 12 of 14
March 13, 2023
Table 9 presents the federally listed species listed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) database for the site boundary (Appendix A-
5).
Table 9: Federally Listed Species (IPaC Database 02/19/23)
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal
Habitat
Survey
Biological
Status
Present?
Dates
Conclusion
Tricolored bat
Perimyotis
PE
Yes
N/A
N/A
sub avus
Red -cockaded
Picoides borealis
E
No
N/A
No Effect
woodpecker
American
Alligator
SAT
No
N/A
N/A
alligator
nussissippiensis
Cape Fear shiner
Notropos
E
Yes
July/Aug
MANLAA
mekistocholas
2022
Atlantic pigtoe
Fusconia masoni
T
Yes
July/Aug
MANLAA
2022
Monarch butterfly
Danaus
C
Possible
N/A
N/A
plexippus
Rough -leaved
Lysimachia
E
Yes
July 2022
No Effect
loosestrife
as erulae olia
PE = Proposed Endangered; E = Endangered; SAT = Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance;
T = Threatened; C = Candidate; MANLAA = May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Tricolored bat: Warm season roosting habitat may be present on the site within the forested
areas. Since this species is proposed but not formally listed as endangered, no biological
conclusion or consultation under Section 7 of the ESA is required. If listing occurs prior to
project construction, coordination with USACE and USFWS on tree clearing dates will be
performed.
Red -cockaded woodpecker: No habitat is present on the site for RCW. Pines are limited to
young stands (under 30 years) and no mature pine -dominated forest areas are present. The site is
not within a RCW consultation area based on the map provided in the SLOPES agreement.
American Alligator: Suitable habitat is not present on the site for the alligator. Streams are
shallow and fast moving and no swamps or other potential habitat are present. The river is fast
moving with rock and riffles, and not anticipated to be alligator habitat.
Cape Fear Shiner: Cape Fear shiner are known to be present upstream on the Cape Fear River,
specifically in Neills Creek to the northwest. Therefore, a survey of major stream crossing
locations on the site as well as the river were performed by Three Oaks Engineering. While they
found no CFS, presence of this species cannot be completely eliminated. Their assessment
concluded that the project is unlikely to adversely affect the species (Appendix A-6).

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks Page 13 of 14
Capeton Individual Permit March 13, 2023
Atlantic pigtoe: Three Oaks performed surveys for this species due to a historical record in the
Cape Fear River adjacent to the site (EO 3997). This species was last observed in 1990 and
current surveys did not find individuals in the river. However, the presence of this species
cannot be completely eliminated and the conclusion was the project is unlikely to adversely
affect the species (Appendix A-6).
Monarch butterfly: Potential habitat cannot be eliminated as milkweed plants may be present in
some areas of the site. However, this species is listed as candidate and is not currently proposed
for listing in the federal register. Therefore, no surveys or consultation under Section 7 of the
ESA is required.
Rough -leaved loosestrife: Areas of potential habitat for this species may be present on the site
along the gas easement and other regularly maintained corridors. Surveys were conducted within
the recommended survey window in 2022 for loosestrife, and no individuals were observed.
Therefore, the project will have no effect on the species.
Cumulative Impacts
Per Section III of the 2004 Cumulative Impact Policy, private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts unless they are (1) relatively large, (2) involve commercial development, and
(3) occur in otherwise relatively undeveloped landscapes with an impact on regional growth
patterns.
While Capeton is relatively large and involves commercial development, it does not occur in a
relatively undeveloped landscape and is unlikely to impact regional growth patterns. As can be
seen in Figure 8, development is already occurring in the vicinity of Lillington and Harnett
County, especially to the north where apartments and other development are occurring in the
Town limits extending along US-421, and northward, independent of and prior to Capeton.
Since Capeton is bounded by the existing Town, the river, and Campbell University, only a few
parcels to the west would be in proximity to the development and these are accessible already
from US-401. In fact, Capeton is providing a comprehensive and multi -use master planned
community with a coordinated stormwater management plan across the majority of the
remaining area for development between US-421 and the river. This area was intended to be
part of the Town as shown in the 2016 Future Land Use mapping (Figure 9). The area already
has existing sewer service available from the pump station on site, and US-421 will not require
widening to accommodate traffic flow associated with the site, which will be addressed via turn
lanes and traffic signals.
Capeton is within a WSW -IV portion of the Cape Fear River watershed and the Town's
stormwater program satisfies Phase II requirements (see stormwater management above). Other
developments within the area would be required to comply with the same rules. Stream buffers
(water supply watershed), impervious setbacks, and flood plain regulations are in effect and
implemented by the Town and/or County depending on jurisdiction.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A8C43292-2E48-40A4-B825-65870F4150AC
Ms. Katharine Elks Page 14 of 14
Capeton Individual Permit March 13, 2023
Conclusion
We would appreciate your consideration of this information during the review of this permit
application and look forward to your favorable review of this project. An electronic copy of this
application is being provided to the NC Division of Water Resources 401 & Buffer Permitting
Branch, along with their required application fee, in order to initiate review for a 401
Certification. Please contact me at your convenience if you have any questions or require further
information.
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
DocuSigned by:
Philip MayE54E4..
Senior Environmental Scientist
Cc: Chad Turlington, NCDWR Fayetteville Regional Office
Sue Homewood, NCDWR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Matthew Brubaker, Greenfield Communities
Bryant Inge, P.E., Withers & Ravenel
Appendix A — Supplemental information
- 1 - Engineering Form 4345
- 2 - Mitigation Phasing & Availability Letters
- 3 - NCSAM Forms
- 4 - NCWAM Forms
- 5 - USFWS IPaC Report
- 6 - Aquatic Survey Report
Appendix B — Figures
- Figure 1 —Vicinity Map
- Figure 2 — USGS Topographic Map (with Impact Locations)
- Figure 3 — NRCS Soil Survey (printed version with Impact Locations)
- Figure 4 — Site Overview
- Figure 5 — Impact Locations
- Figure 6 — Alternative Site Constraints
- Figure 7 — Adjacent Landowners
Appendix C - Engineering Exhibits & Impacts
- Exhibit 1 — Overall Site Plan
- Exhibit 2 — Overall Storm Drainage & Grading Plan
- Exhibit 3 — Stream & Wetland Impact
o Drawing 1 - Overall Stream and Wetland Impacts
o Drawing 2 - Impact Map Sheet Index
o Drawings 3-5 - Stream and Wetland Impacts Summary Table
o Drawings 6-8 - Details
o Stream and Wetland Impact Maps

Capeton Development Table 7 March 13, 2023
Individual Permit Adjacent Landowners
Map ID
Parcel Number
Owner Name
Mailing Address
City
State
Zip
1
0569-09-5965.000
ROSS SUE FIELDS
PO BOX 268
DAVIDSON
NC
28036-0000
2
0569-28-1208.000
TURLINGTON EDWARD
PO BOX 1027
DUNN
NC
28334-0000
3
0569-36-1233.000
LEE STEPHEN ERNEST
4230 GARVIN DR
CHARLOTTE
NC
28269
4
0569-48-8279.000
WIMBERLY LEO HEIRS
3204 NEILLS CREEK ROAD
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-0000
5
0569-58-9253.000
SHROATS FARMS LLC
355 WILDLIFE RD
LILLINGTON
NC
27546
6
0569-77-9406.000
LOVE-GREGORY PROPERTIES LLC
1326 PURFOY ROAD
FUQUAY VARINA
NC
27526
7
0569-79-2036.000
COLEMAN ANTHONY DALE
212 WILDLIFE RD
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-0000
8
0650-62-3125.000
LILLINGTON TOWN OF
PO BOX 296
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-0000
9
0650-70-0774.000
STAFFORD LAND INC EMPLOYEE PRO/TRUS
246 VALLEYFIELD LN
SOUTHERN PNES
NC
28387-6754
10
0650-74-2096.000
SCR1 LLC
114 SALEM TOWNE CT
APEX
NC
27502-2311
11
0650-80-7453.000
STAFFORD LAND INC EMPLOYEE PRO/TRUS
246 VALLEYFIELD LN
SOUTHERN PNES
NC
28387-6754
12
0650-84-5867.000
MONKS PROPERTY LLC
9301 SMART DR
RALEIGH
NC
27603-0000
13
0650-95-0895.000
CURR-WELL DEVELOPMENTS LLC
8079 CHRISTIAN LIGHT ROAD
FUQUAY VARINA
NC
27526-0000
14
0650-95-2360.000
CURR-WELL DEVELOPMENTS LLC
8079 CHRISTIAN LIGHT ROAD
FUQUAY VARINA
NC
27526-0000
15
0660-05-0879.000
RAMESWARAM LLC
300 E CORNELIUS HARNETT BLVD
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-8285
16
0660-05-2865.000
TRAN DINH
6443 NC 210 N
ANGIER
NC
27501
17
0660-05-3850.000
TRAN DINH
6443 NC 210 N
ANGIER
NC
27501
18
0660-05-4745.000
CLCA LLC
PO BOX 2173
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-2173
19
0660-05-5695.000
COUNTY SEAT INC
480 E CORNELIUS HARNETT BLVD
LILLINGTON
NC
27546
20
0660-05-7478.000
COUNTY SEAT INC
480 E CORNELIUS HARNETT BLVD
LILLINGTON
NC
27546
21
0660-15-7317.000
MELTON MARGARET L
3314TIPTON CT
WILMINGTON
NC
28409-6960
22
0660-16-3162.000
JOHNSON JAMES W III TRUSTEE
P O BOX 310
ANGIER
NC
27501-0000
23
0660-25-5096.000
HARNETT COUNTY
PO BOX 759
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-0000
24
0660-34-2790.000
TRUSTEES OF CENTRAL CAROLINA
1105 KELLY DR
SANFORD
NC
27330-9059
25
0660-34-6676.000
HARNETT COUNTY
PO BOX 759
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-0000
26
0660-43-8782.000
BEST LEE JAMES JR TRUSTEE
506 WEST CUMBERLAND STREET
DUNN
NC
28334-0000
27
0660-44-0783.000
TRUSTEES OF CENTRAL CAROLINA
1105 KELLY DR
SANFORD
NC
27330-9059
28
0660-44-4538.000
MELVIN DAVID DALE
150 KEITH HILLS RD
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-9762
29
0660-54-6410.000
421 HARNETT PROPERTY LLC
PO BOX 6356
RALEIGH
NC
27626
30
0660-62-8977.000
MATTHEWS GLENDA
3290THOMPSON RD
BUNNLEVEL
NC
28323-8378
31
0660-63-6278.000
FREEMAN ROSE MCKAY
42 FARMHOUSE CT
SANFORD
NC
27332
32
0660-63-7242.000
WHITE CINDY M
AKA: CINDY MCLEAN 37 OLD SCHOOL LN
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-7674
33
0660-63-8115.000
OCKLETREE CALVIN LEE
8719 GRASMERE CT
FORT WASHINGTON
MD
20744-7151
34
0660-63-8170.000
OCKLETREE CALVIN
P O BOX 2403
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-0000
35
0660-64-6241.000
HATCHER CREEK LLC
126 BRANDON DR
LILLINGTON
NC
27546
36
0660-72-5673.000
CEDAR GROVE CHURCH
PO BOX 1253
LILLINGTON
NC
27546
37
0660-72-7416.000
SMITH WILLIE
138 CARROT LN
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-7656
38
0660-73-0426.000
MCKAY JAMES W
118 CHLOE DRIVE
FAYETTEVILLE
NC
28301-0000
39
0660-73-0697.000
LE HOA VAN
41 LOCKHART LN
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-8085
40
0660-73-6096.000
ICHESTER MATTHEWS FAMILY LAND LLC
1118 CHLOE DRIVE
FAYETTEVILLE
NC
128301
41
0660-74-0066.000
IWILCOHESS LLC
1539 S MAIN ST
FINDLAY
JOH
145840
42
0660-82-0307.000
IJOHNSON CANDIS
1292 CEDAR GROVE SCHOOL ROAD C/O DORIS STEWART
LILLINGTON
NC
27546-0000
43
0660-91-1218.000
ICAMPBELL UNIVERSITY
I PO BOX 97
BUIES CREEK
INC
27506-0097

Ballard
Cape;Fear
=uart
Sherirr
1/Oh
hs
0
7
a z�
Gee
e5
o`
5 m
c �
2� E
G
pe\` Pie 2
Gawp
Buies Creek
M-f
Barclay\sviIIE
1�
1
Fleming Rd C
�a L'illington Keith Hills Golf
Club
-- %/
E Buck
McNeill St
Ross Rd
Shawtown Nar�P�i
o y0.1 Aad �s \ o
m A ? Harnett County \
Airport a
3 7 s
m
CO�r 27
NGti�� 401
Pine Burr Golf \GSsr oia
=Store v Course O� State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc,kMETI/NASA, USk, EPA, NPS, USDA
G.� ,i `N 6ff.
per y°h p �i
��11GAROLINA N Figure 1
VVECOSYSTEMS Feet Site Vicinity Map
�
0 2,000 4,000 Capeton
February 2023 Harnett County, NC

------ USGS The National Map. ndaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevatipqt,,Prqgram, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset,
National Land Cover Database, National Structures Data set, n a I Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line
data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental
F�kpNt sr Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed June, 2022.
L2
eNCAROLINA N Impact II)s correspond to the impact locations depicted in the Figure 2
VVECOSYSTEMS Feet Study Area Impacts engineering drawings. USGS Topographic Map
0 400 800 Capeton
February 2023 USGS The National Map Harnett County, NC

3 Ro * OrB �° D �s,f
f N aA
B
�
D �i (`� �� �� � .�-- Bh ..� `'`'-�- ID
WaB A71 � Lr�B
LnD
2114 VVaB
l.MBPd Bb 4
No . Lna WdB Pf - .
NoB �► NoA Pf - UVa 3 m
Jh � - NoB OrB .0
WaB.
OrB WaB NOB GOA
W
Pf
h
No
Pf OrB Rd w�
reo
- Vyh NoB `
h aC GoA
- WkB NUB,,
U NoB
�..,. .� Ln D C, a B
kB WkB
w�oB
M W a B
NoC
Ch
Al , WkB
. ,��� � • �
Ch E, Wk.B
Ilk B
kB
Ch
AIA
er
r eB w Non ��- Q� "'� Natural Resource rvaGi. Service (NRCS'),hDOT Project ATLAS SWEEP group
N Impact IDs correspond to the impact locations de icted in the Figure 3
E
CAROLINA p P p P
ECOSYSTEMS Feet Study Area Impacts engineering drawings. NRCS SOIL Survey
0 400 goo Capeton
February 2023 Harnett County (1994) NRCS Soil Survey Map Harnett County, NC

e
r \ A WAY`
' yWAZWA
� wr ';;..t - to SQ z •
' WB W
r{.. WV WAB
(: S8 1�2 gOr WU WAG
WC �S WWADWAF
WAQ WDy ` 5¢
1 '
A WAC
WAP WAU AR WAH ,
.► -WAI'.
i WBJ
_ y(-(WBK
'd .� a � I * �-.. ..'�` a "�. ' i -; I�i/�•; '*?, `{ S•_. t1,i.f.`��r �. ' �

t ,
. Ir t
�Y' 4
4
xv
�T ,•s.?.. ' t .. - OP'�� .. ti i �. �i�+� 4•n�� 00,
ot
� V7
� • r.:t' x r ' AJ - , - - - '.4#� i .sue ! _
OL
/
+ •yam �;L-.1, �` M�.�Li{�. {`. �.L �-\ y`
f ! 4'•j",E�a ,�. :'k , ` M1.�4 "t , Y, �•�y. I '. _ ° � � 'M - µ ���.ii�a Jt. "; 1 "'ti... t
40
fig

401
� 1, 17
13 1 22
arc az1
14 16 23
12 18 20 4 25 7 28
2 421
411
10 26
1 8
CPO
F' F
PQ
r
R�L
lington P�
_reation 9
Park
43
421
11
001111111,
1
Cape FeOl
R er
2 3 4
5 6
i Community Maps Contri utors, State of North Carolina DOT, Esr' RE, Gar n, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, PA,-fNPS, US
Census B eau; USD
0 CAROLINA N site BoundaryAdjacent Landowners See Adjacent Landowner Table in permit Figure 7
ECOSYSTEMS Mites application for PIN numbers and owner Adjacent Landowners
0 0.09 0.17 Parcels information Capeton
February 2023 Harnett County, NC

CD
Developments o �a G
C, COMMERCIAL SITE PLANS \\\__Wilburn2sl
/ Arlie-Iie-L-n �� � �
a Wilburn' ii / �\ J
EXEMPT 10 OR MORE ACRES Z m• �a wet o'
5 O�.
Cie erc Z� re
INDUSTRIAL y e w n
Chesle _-L-n U Om
MAJOR �3pe ii ° CD
MHp Ra 3y a m G`
w
MINOR 3 OR MORE LOTS m 269 ft p S�
g e 276 ft
MULTI FAMILY r�p0 Rd a
\z
"� o sh � Sheeiffyouh�s Gee¢,
�• �/ N or e�=Rd 6
'f?Johnson=Rd�
\ 2 oats
0 ah
m
y Cape Fear
1 1
er.
S-River-Rd,_� �O
L7 0�
II�IIII IlUll I�� 20 0
Jc WCD
Fly 421 - CD d \7 a
Dry C Rd
KivetU�
t_ �e
� peAA!:
c - MP"
421 Oak St a
mo
401 421 O l G
f
a� � oL�d =moo
350 fr a N
�QLi'll i ngto.n 218 ft
iGs OU��ODOOV� ,�1tSt Cape Fear River a sOeeK
332 ft ���o �o 1 �� �
e
O O a' c
w0-IdR,d nj%/� o 0o r Q-
_Rd Key
McNeill_St•Bei
=
Ross-Rd� °kMi11_Rd�J�-_
O e
O'r6
a err
�� h wtown eCreek o y
,NASA,NGA, USGS, FEM State of North Carolina DOTtEsri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnal gies, Inc, METIjNASA, USG _ FPA NPS, U C sus
s,
�o �?� ur au, USDA
Harne^ tt County 421
Airport
[1CAROLINA N Figure 8
VVECOSYSTEMS Miles Area Development
0 0.25 0.5
Capeton
March 2023 Harnett County, NC

FutureLandUse2016
Agricultural
Angier ETJ
Benson ETJ
a
Broadway ETJ
Coats ETJ
Compact Mixed Use
Compatibility Development Target Area
Dunn ETJ
Employment Mixed use
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Erwin ETJ
Fuquay_Varina ETJ
Lillington ETJ
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Mililtary
Military Corridor Buffer
Protected Areas
Rural Center
G
m
c.
421
S River Rd
269 ft s�ar
m
Tripp
Z Sheriff_Johns
o S
h
U I .Fzd o~"kJohnson"Rd
2 Goats �
I'D N
° 611
7G'
�o��
c
�m
(D
01
N 7 y
0 Cr \t�
421
F
1 a s
W Q) Kip
= U
m CO
n 3
421 m t
Buies Creek
u �
O N'S
� 6
y-Cape rear
—sa[ ft W R d Old Cl)aJ ��
'4 f
Mo0ou9ald Rd W Old Rd D �e Ke�tir
E McNeill St
Ross Rd
A
O
O B/d
n cube
&older Ra Shawtown %LICree/r
a� o R° Harnett C
or gr l^ Airpo
o
O� f'
ism
o- 266ft yard Rd f'
G
_O
m �y e
m
401 �rp�
,P\e
Esri, AS NGA, USGS, FEMA, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraphc¢eoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, US' S, EPA, NPS, US Censu
v Q� Bureau, USDA
Qs `� ` ° m
N ^Q, W ��
IL
[1CAROLINA N Figure 9
ECOSYSTEMS Miles Future Land Use
0 0.25 0.5
Capeton
March 2023 Harnett County, NC
350 ft
0
a
!iS 4�11V
Cape Fear
7
q�
Wy
N
er R
a
Oak St r\
275 ft 401
wt�ey St Lillington
F Front St

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8709C3DD-925F-4AD3-8D5A-B70924AC3267
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Form Approved -
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB No. 0710-0003
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Expires: 01-08-2018
The public reporting burden for this collection of information, OMB Control Number 0710-0003, is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services,
at whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dod-information-collections(a-)mail.mil. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall
be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT
RETURN YOUR APPLICATION TO THE ABOVE EMAIL.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act,
Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form
will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and
local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission of requested information
is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set of original drawings or good
reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and/or instructions)
and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
System of Record Notice (SORN). The information received is entered into our permit tracking database and a SORN has been completed (SORN #A1145b)
and may be accessed at the following website: http://dpcld.defense.gov/Privacy/SORNslndex/DOD-wide-SORN-Article-View/Article/570115/al l45b-ce.aspxx
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Matthew Middle - Last - Brubaker
First - Philip Middle - Last - May
Company - Greenfield Communities
Company - Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
E-mail [e-mail]
E-mail [e-mail]
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 8601 Six Forks Road
Address- 3040 NC-42 W
City - Raleigh State - NC Zip - 27615 Country -USA
City - Clayton State - NC Zip - 27520 Country -USA
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
[phone]
[phone]
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit applic t' DacuSigned by:
i 3/8/2023
SIGN ANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Capeton Development
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Dry Creek/Cape Fear River
Address E Cornelius Harnett Boulevard
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 35.407186 Longitude: -W-78.791708
City - Lillington State- NC Zip- 27615
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID See Cover Letter Municipality Lillington
Section - Township - Range -
ENG FORM 4345, MAY 2018 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 3 of 1

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8709C3DD-925F-4AD3-8D5A-B70924AC3267
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From Wilmington, take I-40 West to Exit 341 in Newton Grove. Go west on NC-55 to US-421 in Dunn and turn right. Continue west on
US-421 for approximately 15 miles and the site will be on the left.
From Raleigh, take US-401 South to Fuquay-Varina. Follow NC-55 south to Angier, then turn right onto NC-210. At the intersection of
NC-210 and US-421 in Lillington, take a left and continue approximately 1 mile and the site will be on the right.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
See attached cover letter.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
See attached cover letter.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
See attached cover letter
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
See attached cover letter
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres See attached cover letter
or
Linear Feet
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
See attached cover letter
ENG FORM 4345, MAY 2018 Page 3 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8709C3DD-925F-4AD3-8D5A-B70924AC3267
24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes ❑X No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
The phases of the project covered by the No DA Permit Required determination are planned to begin construction in the second quarter of
2023, as detailed in the December 2022 request.
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- See Cover Letter
City - State - Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
See cover letter
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant. Doc signed by: Doc signed by:
__ . 3/8/2023 PUr " 3/8/2023
SIGNA F ANT DATE SIG :Yt "WIMENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent
statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent
statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, MAY 2018 Page 3 of 3

c R-MM, �
n - g

O Q
LQ
+_
z
0
_ O
O
Q a
w
`)
WETLAND & STREAM
PERMANENT
PERMANENT (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
PERMANENT CONVERSION
TEMPORARY
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
5
A
W1
ROADWAYGRADING
9,667
0.222
-
-
W2
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
514
0.012
5
B
51
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
4
9
0.001
-
-
S2
ROADWAYGRADING
135
355
0.009
-
-
-
-
-
-
S3
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
-
-
-
12
25
0.001
-
-
-
S4
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
7
14
0.001
-
-
W3
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
357
0.009
W4
ROADWAYGRADING
7,042
0.162
-
-
W5
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
195
0.005
-
-
W6
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
257
0.006
5
C
W7
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
5,774
0.133
-
-
W8
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
5,830
0.134
rj
D
W9
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
1,662
0.039
-
-
W10
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
1,230
0.029
W11
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
480
0.011
S5
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
21
259
0.006
-
-
-
-
-
S6
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
23
279
0.007
-
-
rj
E
W12
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
5,548
0.128
W13
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
6,085
0.140
-
-
W14
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
1,630
0.038
S7
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
21
347
0.008
-
-
-
-
-
S8
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
23
362
0.009
-
-
j
F
W15
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
1,789
0.041
W16
ROADWAYGRADING
24,918
0.572
-
-
W17
ROADWAYGRADING
10,240
0.235
-
-
W18
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
393
0.009
W19
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
434
0.010
W20
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
1,230
0.029
-
-
-
-
W21
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
-
-
3,563
0.082
-
-
W22
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
817
0.019
W23
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
3,519
0.081
S9
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
11
165
0.004
-
-
S10
ROADWAYGRADING
142
3,694
0.085
-
-
-
S11
STREAM REALIGNMENT
58
962
0.022
-
-
-
S12
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
82
0.002
S13
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
21
264
0.006
-
-
-
S14
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
21
237
0.006
G�
Z
0
LIJ
a
Q
U
�o
i
W
J
0
m
Z
J
~
W
GC
3
C
0
G
Z=
CQ
G
w
U
w
Q
F
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN: WR
DGN: WR CKD: WR
3

O Q
Z)
OL
+_ (�
a
z
Q 0
a
O
O
U
Q a
a LL
w
W ETLAN D & STREAM
PERMANENT
PERMANENT (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
PERMANENT CONVERSION
TEMPORARY
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
`)
2
G
W24
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
GRADING
5,897
0.136
2
H
W25
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
GRADING
65,986
1.515
W26
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
GRADING
-
-
-
7,652
0.176
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
W27
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
131
0.003
1
I
W28
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
GRADING
6,604
0.152
-
-
W29
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
702
0.017
W30
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
191
0.005
W31
ROADWAYGRADING
2,023
0.047
-
-
W32
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
31
0.001
S15
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
7
17
0.001
-
-
3
S16
ROADWAYGRADING
251
813
0.019
-
-
-
-
-
-
S17
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
-
-
-
11
34
0.001
-
-
-
S18
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
26
0.001
S19
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
GRADING
130
334
0.008
-
-
-
-
-
-
S20
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
_
-
-
27
181
0.005
-
-
-
S21
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
22
122
0.003
3
K
W33
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
1,009
0.024
-
-
-
-
-
W34
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
1,109
0.026
W35
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
107
0.003
3
L
W36
ROADWAYGRADING
610
0.014
-
-
-
S22
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
4
6
0.001
3
M
S23
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
GRADING
121
482
0.011
-
-
-
-
-
-
S24
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
-
-
-
3
6
0.001
-
-
-
S25
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
4
6
0.001
W37
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
4
0.001
-
-
-
W38
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
9
0.001
W39
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
652
0.015
-
-
W40
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
609
0.014
S26
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
28
180
0.005
-
-
1
N
527
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
26
143
0.004
S28
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
25
31
0.001
-
-
-
S29
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
25
52
0.002
S30
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
22
87
0.002
-
-
-
S31
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
21
101
0.003
G�
Z
0
LIJ
a
Q
U
�o
i
W
J
0
zm
J
~
W
GC
3
C
0
G
Z=
CQ
G
w
U
w
Q
F
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN: WR
DGN: WR CKD: WR
4

O Q
Z)
iO7 OL
}' (�
a
z
Q 0
a�
O
z
Q a
aLL
w
W ETLAN D & STREAM
PERMANENT
PERMANENT (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
PERMANENT CONVERSION
TEMPORARY
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
`)
1
O
S32
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
22
145
0.004
-
-
-
S33
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
21
91
0.002
S34
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
4
19
0.001
S35
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
-
-
-
9
47
0.001
-
-
-
S36
ROADWAYGRADING
191
1,013
0.024
-
-
-
-
-
-
S37
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
4
10
0.001
-
-
2
P
W41
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
216
0.005
W42
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
40
0.001
-
-
W43
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
GRADING
4,134
0.095
-
-
W44
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
155
0.004
4
Q
W45
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
2,402
0.056
-
-
W46
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,258
0.029
TOTAL IMPACTS
1,028
7,653
0.178
146,238
3.361
220
1,569
0.040
21,151
0.490
240
1,778
0.051
27,316
0.635
Gi
O
LIJ
a
Q
U
�o
i
W
J
0
Zm
J
~
W
GC
3
C
0
G
Z=
CQ
G
w
U
w
Q
H
a
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR

Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability
Barra Farms II Wetland Mitigation Bank
March 10, 2023
Matt Brubaker
Greenfield Communities
8601 Six Forks Road
Suite 270
Raleigh NC 27615
Re: Availability of Compensatory Wetland Credits: Barra Farms II Wetland Bank
River Basin/HUC: Cape Fear 03030004
We are providing this letter in accordance with 33 CFR §332.8(r), to confirm that 1.52 Non -Riparian Wetland
Mitigation Credits (Credits) from the Barra Farm II (Bank) are currently available and all or a portion may be used,
once transferred, for compensatory mitigation relative to the Capeton -Harnett County project, and as proposed by
Greenfield Communities (Applicant).
The Applicant may ultimately purchase the Credits, if they are available, following Permit issuance. Should the
Applicant purchase the Credits at that time, we will complete and execute the Compensatory Mitigation
Responsibility Transfer Form (Transfer Form) within five (5) days of receipt of the full purchase price.
We will additionally provide copies of the completed and executed Transfer Form to the Applicant, the Bank's US
Army Corps (USACE) Project Manager and, if needed, other regulatory agencies. In addition, we will provide USACE
with an updated copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction information in the updated Bank
Ledger will include relevant Permit and Applicant information as well as the number and resource type of the debited
Credits.
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919.334.9118.
Sincerely,
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC

HOLDIN*Gs
Stream & Riparian Wetland Credit Statement of Availability
Cape Fear 04 Watershed
March 10, 2023
Greenfield Communities
Attn: Matt Brubaker
8601 Six Forks Road, Suite 270
Raleigh NC 27615
RE: Availability of Stream and Riparian Wetland Credits for the "Capeton" project
Bank Name: Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Bank Site: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
Permittee: Greenfield Communities
Stream Credits Needed: 1,669 LF
Stream Credits Available: 1,583 LF
Future Stream Credit Release: 1,202 (March 2024)
Riparian Wetland Credits Needed: 4.24 acres
Riparian Wetland Credits Available: 2.78 acres
Future Riparian Wetland Credit Release: 2.08 (March 2024)
Cape Fear 03030004 River Basin
Dear Mr. Brubaker:
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC currently has sufficient stream and riparian wetland credits from the Middle
Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site to satisfy the mitigation
requirements related to the above -mentioned project. The project is located within the Cape Fear HUC
03030004 watershed.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. It is neither a guarantee
of future credit availability, nor a guarantee of credit pricing. Credits are sold on a first come, first serve
basis at the Bank's price at the time an invoice is requested. Invoices reserve both the credits and the
price for a period of 30 days. Credits and associated pricing may be reserved for up to 6 months with a
signed reservation agreement and a 10% deposit.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon completion of the Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form
within the 404 permit approving the mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your
payment to Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

HOLDIN*Gs
[phone] x114 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Sincerely,
Camden M. Brunick
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Mitigation Credit Sales
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ext. 114
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. Katherine Elks, Regulatory Agent I USACE
Mr. Philip May, Senior Scientist I Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Capeton Date of Evaluation
Stream Category la4 Assessor Name/Organization
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
11 /10/22
Preston Butler
NO
YES
NO
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4) Microtopography HIGH
(3) Stream Stability HIGH
(4) Channel Stability HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport NA
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(i) Habitat HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat HIGH
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3) Substrate NA
(3) Stream Stability HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name River Tract
Stream Category Pal
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
Date of Evaluation 10/20/21
Assessor Name/Organization
P. Butler
NO
YES
NO
Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
NO
OMITTED
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
(i) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In -stream Habitat
(2) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
MEDIUM

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name River Tract
Stream Category Pal
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
Date of Evaluation 10/20/21
Assessor Name/Organization
P. Butler
NO
YES
NO
Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
OMITTED
NA
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
(i) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In -stream Habitat
(2) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
HIGH

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Capeton Date of Evaluation
Stream Category la2 Assessor Name/Organization
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
12/1 /22
P Butler
NO
YES
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4) Microtopography LOW
(3) Stream Stability HIGH
(4) Channel Stability HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(i) Habitat LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat LOW
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3) Substrate MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Capeton Date of Evaluation
Stream Category la2 Assessor Name/Organization
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
11 /10/22
Preston Butler
NO
YES
NO
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4) Microtopography LOW
(3) Stream Stability HIGH
(4) Channel Stability HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(i) Habitat HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat HIGH
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3) Substrate HIGH
(3) Stream Stability HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WM-Dry Creek (gas easement)
Date
11/10/22
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
Preston Butler
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WM-Dry Creek
Date
11/10/22
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
Preston Butler
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WM-Site 1
Date
11/10/22
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
Preston Butler
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Vegetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WM-Site 2
Date
11/10/22
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
Preston Butler
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WR-1
Date
2/7/23
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
Phil May
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions
(Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WR-2
Date
2/7/23
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
Phil May
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions
(Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition
Condition
LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAG
Date
11/10/22
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
Preston Butler
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAP
Date
11/10/22
Wetland Type Hardwood Flat
Assessor Name/Organization
Preston Butler
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Physical Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
LOW
Water Quality Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAQ
Date
11/10/22
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
Preston Butler
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Vegetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
IPaC
IPaC resource list
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as
critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project
area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the
project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the
project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have
on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed
activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for
the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the
introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS
Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources
addressed in that section.
Location
Harnett County, North Carolina
40
C
I 7
Y,
1' v
Mt:v�
F,N I IIY
r ilr.6.1.
UI
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
1 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
Iij [phone]
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
ILTAWIII►[91G1B7l7.71.M
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
2 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
Endangered species
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI
includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by
activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish
does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or
eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can
change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project
area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list
from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local
field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program
of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under theirjurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC
also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status
page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
3 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department
of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Birds
►I_1111l
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
STATUS
Proposed Endangered
STATUS 400C "No\
Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles 0
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Fishes
61IG11 h
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location
does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Clams
NAME
SAT
Endangered
STATUS
4 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location
does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
Threatened
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
5 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds laUps://www.fws.gov/library_
/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files
/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To
see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and
around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location,
desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic
Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of
bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast
birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to
properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
►1_1111s
also �ll►[eil7_F.��l�
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis Breeds May 1 to Sep 30
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/6177
6 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to Jul 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska. rN&4
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most
7 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and
schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure
you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid
cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as
12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence
score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey
effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events
in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey
events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the
Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted
Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of
presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative
probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a
statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is
the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season (
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in
your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data( )
8 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently
relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird
returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently
much more sparse.
SPECIES
American
Kestrel
BCC - BCR
Bachman's
Sparrow
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Brown -
headed
Nuthatch
BCC - BCR
Chimney
Swift
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Eastern
Whip -poor -
will
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie
Warbler
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
++- ' 1 14 I_++ 11L :: JILE Al 111-0 +--i 1. , .. I � � . I t I
4- -1-- --- Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill 1
��` �,
::: III lill Jill Jill fill�`���IPi.II Jill 1111
..,-u.� lill Jill III
r.
4-1-1 1_1 +V -+++ -III
..+- -ii4 i�W.l .:ll 11MIMI ... -+•.
-+-+--+. --� Jill Jill Jill III--- � -----
Prothonotary ..++�++'- J J Jill''" —111 +--- 4- ­ +--- —+++ —+++
Warbler
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
9 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty
Blackbird
BCC - BCR
Wood
Thrush
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when
birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying
the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization
measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the
Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the
type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project
site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKIN data is based on a growing collection of survey_, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention
because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species
that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project
area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds
potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided
by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey,
banding, and citizen science datasets.
10 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to
interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these
graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a
bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If
"Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout
their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs)
in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid
and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean
Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be
helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files
underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive
Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project
webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For
additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study_ and the nanotag studies
or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
11 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the
migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the
"probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact
project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by
the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score
can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of
data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply
a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when
they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps
you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should
presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about
conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom
of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
12 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
Wetlands in the National Wetlands
Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corp -
of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working
to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to
determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
IISol 01MNi%11Iamgo] Sol 021aKIMNMI mail] :00i0alI_1►191
PF01A
PF 1
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
RIVERINE
R2UBH
R4 B
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory_
website
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether
wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis
of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography.
A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any
particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through
image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the
image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth
verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems.
13 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/J7EENELLD5HLVNDWKU3...
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work.
There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information
depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the
design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state,
or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government
agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland
areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified
agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
3X***4 ftof
14 of 14 2/19/2023, 9:41 AM

Mainstem Cape Fear River Site 2
Aquatic Species Survey Report
0
o�a
0
GAPETOiv
Harnett County, North Carolina
Prepared For:
L-tGREENFIELD
Prepared by:
324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200
Durham, NC 27701
October 07, 2022

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................
1
2.0 Target Species Descriptions.................................................................................................
1
2.1. Notropis mekistocholas (Cape Fear Shiner).....................................................................
1
2.1.1. Characteristics...........................................................................................................1
2.1.2. Distribution and Habitat Requirements....................................................................
2
2.1.3. Threats to Species.....................................................................................................
3
2.1.4. Designated Critical Habitat.......................................................................................
4
2.2. Fusconaia masoni (Atlantic Pigtoe).................................................................................
5
2.2.1. Characteristics...........................................................................................................5
2.2.2. Distribution and Habitat Requirements....................................................................
5
2.2.3. Threats to Species.....................................................................................................
6
2.2.4. Designated Critical Habitat.......................................................................................
7
3.0 Survey Efforts......................................................................................................................
9
3.1. Stream Conditions at Time of Surveys............................................................................
9
3.1.1. Dry Creek..................................................................................................................
9
3.1.2. UT Cape Fear River..................................................................................................
9
3.1.3. Cape Fear River Site 1..............................................................................................
9
3.1.4. Cape Fear River Site 2..............................................................................................
9
3.1.5. Cape Fear River Site 3............................................................................................
10
3.2. Methodology..................................................................................................................
10
3.2.1. Fish Surveys............................................................................................................
10
3.2.2. Mussel Surveys.......................................................................................................
11
4.0 Results................................................................................................................................11
4.1. Dry Creek.......................................................................................................................
11
4.2. UT Cape Fear River.......................................................................................................
12
4.3. Cape Fear River Site 1...................................................................................................
12
4.4. Cape Fear River Site 2...................................................................................................
13
4.5. Cape Fear River Site 3...................................................................................................
14
5.0 Discussion/Conclusions.....................................................................................................
15
5.1. Cape Fear Shiner............................................................................................................
15
5.2. Atlantic Pigtoe................................................................................................................
15
6.0 Literature Cited..................................................................................................................
17
Appendix A. Figures:
Figure 1: Project Vicinity & Survey Reach
Figure 2-1 and 2-2: NCNHP Element Occurrences and Designated Critical Habitat
Appendix B. Select Photographs

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Greenfield Communities is planning the development of an 820-acre site along the Cape Fear
River near Lillington, North Carolina, known as Capeton (Appendix A, Figure 1). Capteon will
consist of a mixed -use community consisting of 2,250 residential units, retail and commercial
uses, and greenspace. Based on preliminary project mapping, two perennial stream crossings are
proposed within the development: one in Dry Creek and one in an unnamed tributary to the
mainstem Cape Fear River. Additionally, three areas bordering the mainstem Cape Fear have
also been identified as potential impact areas. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
Information, Planning, and Consultation (IPaC) system lists the Federally Endangered Cape Fear
Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) and Threatened Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni) as species
that could potentially be affected by activities in these locations (USFWS IPaC 2022a).
Table I lists the nearest element occurrences (EOs) for Cape Fear Shiner and Atlantic Pigtoe in
approximate river miles (RM). Data is according to the NC Natural Heritage Program database
(NCNHP 2022) most recently updated in July 2022. Measurements are taken from the upstream -
most potential impact area, or surveyed reach (Site 1) within the project area (Figures 2-1 and 2-
2).
Table 1—Element Occurrences
Distance from
First
Last
EO
Target Species
EO ID
EO Waterbody
Site (RM)
Observed
Observed
Status*
Figure
August
23981
Neills Creek
1.9
July 2021
C
Cape Fear Shiner
1962
2-1
3997
Cape Fear River
@ Site 1
1969
July 1990
H
Atlantic Pigtoe
22292
Fork Creek
>50
June 2002
June 2002
C
2-2
*: C — NCNHP Current; H —NCNHP Historic
As part of the federal permitting process that requires an evaluation of potential project -related
effects to federally protected species, Three Oaks Engineering (Three Oaks) was contracted to
conduct surveys on Capeton targeting Cape Fear Shiner and Atlantic Pigtoe.
2.0 TARGET SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS
2.1. Notropis mekistocholas (Cape Fear Shiner)
2.1.1. Characteristics
The Cape Fear Shiner is a small, moderately stocky Cyprinid
described by Snelson (1971). The fish's body is flushed pale
silvery yellow, with a black band running along the side. The
fins are yellowish and somewhat pointed. The upper lip is black,
and the lower lip bears a thin black bar along its margin.
The Cape Fear Shiner is distinguished from all other Notropis by
having an elongated alimentary tract with two convolutions
crossing the intestinal bulb. This is believed to be an adaptation
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 1

for herbivorous feeding, although the species is known to be omnivorous based on gut content
analysis (Snelson 1971, USFWS 1988). Cape Fear Shiner diet consists of diatoms, periphyton,
detritus, and macroinvertebrates. Therefore, this adaptation is believed to be useful in that when
insectivorous fish populations are high and animal material is correspondingly low, the Cape
Fear Shiner is able to thrive by shifting to herbivorous feeding habits (USFWS 2022b citing
Groves 2000). Wild Cape Fear Shiner are believed to live roughly three years but may reach up
to nine years in captivity (USFWS 2022b).
The Cape Fear Shiner is usually found in low numbers in schools with other shiner species such
as Highfin Shiner (Notropis altipinnis), Swallowtail Shiner (Notropis procne), White Shiner
(Luxilus albeolus), Sandbar Shiner (Notropis scepticus), Spottail Shiner (Notropis hudsonius),
Comely Shiner (Notropis amoenus), Satinfin Shiner (Cyprinella analostana), and Whitefin
Shiner (Cyprinella nivea) (Pottern 2009).
2.1.2. Distribution and Habitat Requirements
The Cape Fear Shiner is most often found in rocky pools, runs, and riffles with substrates
containing gravel, cobble, and/or boulder components. These areas are typical of streams in the
Carolina Slatebelt and Raleigh Belt with wide, shallow sections, an open forest canopy, and
abundant American Water Willow (Justicia americans), Riverweed (Podostemum sp.), stream
mosses (Fontinalis sp.), and filamentous algae. The species may be found in lower -gradient
sections of rivers with sand dominated substrate, but usually only in low numbers, presumably as
they move between more rocky sections (USFWS 2022b citing Pottern 2009). Gravel substrate
has been shown to be important for Cape Fear Shiner in feeding and spawning (USFWS 2011).
In comparing shiner density with substrate type, Howard (2003) found low shiner density in
areas with less gravel availability.
Endemic to the upper Cape Fear River Basin in the Central Piedmont region of North Carolina,
Cape Fear Shiner occupies the tributaries and mainstems of the Cape Fear, Deep, Haw, and
Rocky Rivers in Chatham, Harnett, Lee, Moore, and Randolph counties. Specifically, the
current known range extends from SR 1545 (Chicken Bridge Rd) of the Haw River in Chatham
County and from Coleridge Dam on the Deep River in Randolph County downstream to Erwin
on the mainstem Cape Fear River. Including major tributaries such as the Rocky River, this is a
range of approximately 135 RM (Pottern 2009); however, there are significant gaps in occupancy
within this range, due to a number of factors, most notably large, impounded sections such as
Jordan Lake on the Haw River and High Falls Dam on the Deep River. The lower five miles of
the Rocky River and the Deep River between High Falls and Coleridge area are known to have
the highest densities of the minnow. The species is known to occupy a few tributaries to these
mainstem rivers but is typically only found within two miles of the confluence (Pottern 2009).
A total of eight Management Units (MUs) have been identified within three eight -digit
hydrologic unit code (HUC8) subbasins of the Upper Cape Fear River Basin, where the Cape
Fear Shiner is known to occur (USFWS 2022b). There are two MUs occur within the Haw River
Subbasin (HUC 03030002), four within the Rocky -Deep River Subbasin (HUC 03030003) and
two within the Upper Cape Fear River Subbasin (HUC 03030004). MUs encompass ten -digit
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 2

hydrologic unit codes (HUC10s). The project area occurs within the Cape Fear 2 MU (HUC
0303000405) of the Upper Cape Fear River Subbasin.
An extensive effort was conducted in 2020 to evaluate current Cape Fear Shiner populations
throughout their range. These efforts confirmed presence in the Rocky and Deep River
drainages, while being unable to find individuals in the two Haw River Subbasin MUs or the two
MUs of the Upper Cape Fear River Subbasin. However, presence was confirmed in 2021 in
Neills Creek by a private consultant (USFWS 2022b).
2.1.3. Threats to Species
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) highlights three metrics as being
most detrimental (listed high in the Conservation Concern Score) to Cape Fear Shiner in the
2020 North Carolina State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) (NCWRC 2020). The three metrics
include Natural System Modifications, Development, and Agriculture & Forestry. Natural
System Modifications are believed to the most severe and pervasive, due to the number of
barriers and impoundments present in the current Cape Fear Shiner range. There are three
additional factors that score in the medium range for Conservation Concern Score;
Energy/mining, invasive species, and pollution. Additionally, the restricted range and small
population sizes make this species vulnerable to catastrophic events (USFWS 1988).
Catastrophic events may consist of natural events such as flooding or drought, as well as human
influenced events such as toxic spills associated with highways, railroads, or industrial -municipal
complexes.
Habitat alteration resulting from multiple dam construction projects in the Cape Fear system is
likely the most significant factor that contributed to the species decline (USFWS 2022b). Upper
Cape Fear River Basin dams alter flows and sediment transport and impound key habitat
elements critical to the Cape Fear Shiner. These impoundments fragment the species' population
and limit genetic exchange, which can increase vulnerability to catastrophic events (USFWS
2011). Hydroelectric dams are threatening to the Cape Fear Shiner from the perspective of
habitat alteration, and also fit into the category of mining/energy SWAP metric. The removal of
the Hoosier Dam on the Rocky River is believed to expand access of the upper Rocky River for
the extant Cape Fear Shiner population in that river drainage (USFWS 2022c).
Development and Agriculture/ Forestry are identified as significant factors in the species decline
as well, due to the influx of pollutants and sedimentation that can result from these operations
(USFWS 2022b, NCWRC 2020). Sedimentation resulting from poor agricultural practices or
construction projects threatens habitat by smothering key rocky substrates or submerged aquatic
vegetation areas, in addition to altering water quality in surrounding waterways. Water quality
has been identified by Howard (2003) to be a limiting factor for Cape Fear Shiner. Caged
shiners in the Haw River saw significant reduction in survival and growth, which was associated
with higher concentrations of metals (cadmium, cooper, zinc, mercury, lead) and organic
contaminants (PAH, PCB, DDT, chlordane) in tested tissues as well as in Haw River water and
sediments. Sedimentation may also be accelerated by gravel/sand mining operations present in
the Upper Cape Fear River Basin (NCWRC 2020).
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 3

Introductions of non-native predator species could also negatively affect the Cape Fear Shiner.
Introductions of the Spotted Bass (Micropterus punctulatus), Flathead Catfish (Pylodictis
olivaris), and Blue Catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin could result
in a decline of the Cape Fear Shiner within its range (NCWRC 2020).
The current status of the Cape Fear shiner is evaluated by three factors: resiliency, redundancy,
and representation. Resiliency reflects the species ability to react to a given stochastic event.
Cape Fear Shiner currently only have one subpopulation (encompassing 38% of its range) that
exhibits moderate to high resiliency, the remaining population rating as low (USFWS 2022b).
Redundancy is a measure of the species ability to survive a localized catastrophic event by
having several healthy subpopulations to spread the potential risk. In this case, only one of the
three subpopulations (Rocky/Deep Rivers) contains multiple healthy occupied HUC10 MUs,
while the Haw and Cape Fear subpopulations are represented only by four unhealthy MUs
collectively. Lastly, representation categorizes the species genetic diversity and adaptive
capacity. Due to the narrow endemism and population density of the Cape Fear Shiner, the
species scores low to moderate on all 12 of the "core attributes" used in evaluating
representation. The only attribute the Cape Shiner scores high in is its diet breadth, due to its
omnivorous adaptations (USFWS 2022b).
2.1.4. Designated Critical Habitat
In accordance with Section 4 of the ESA, Critical Habitat for listed species consists of:
1) The specific areas within the geographical area occupied by the species at the time it is
listed in which are found those physical or biological features (constituent elements) that
are:
a. essential to the conservation of the species, and
b. which may require special management considerations or protection
2) Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species at the time it is listed
in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 of the Act, upon a determination by the
Secretary that such areas are "essential for the conservation of the species."
On 25 September 1987, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed the Cape Fear Shiner
as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. Critical habitat designation
provided at that time (CFR Vol. 52 No. 186) consists of the following:
Unit 1 - Approximately 4.1 RM (6.6 River Kilometers (RKM)) of the Rocky River in
Chatham County, North Carolina
Unit 2 - Approximately 7.3 RM (11.8 RKM) of Bear Creek, Rocky River, and Deep
River in Chatham County, North Carolina
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 4

• Unit 3 - Approximately 5.6 RM (9.0 RKM) of Fork Creek, and Deep River in Randolph
and Moore Counties, North Carolina.
Since the listing of the species, the area of known occupied habitat for the Cape Fear Shiner has
significantly expanded through restoration activities such as the removal of the Carbonton Dam
on the Deep River and updated survey efforts.
Critical Habitat Unit 2 is the closest unit occurring 25.7 RM from the project crossing, located on
the Deep River, Rocky River, and Bear Creek (Figure 2-1).
2.2. Fusconaia masoni (Atlantic Pigtoe)
2.2.1. Characteristics
the left valve is broad and flat.
The Atlantic Pigtoe was described by Conrad (1834) from the
Savannah River in Augusta, Georgia. Although larger
specimens exist, the Atlantic Pigtoe seldom exceeds 50 mm (2
inches) in length. This species is tall relative to its length, except
in headwater stream reaches where specimens may be elongated.
The hinge ligament is relatively short and prominent. The
periostracum is normally brownish, has a parchment texture, and
young individuals may have greenish rays across the entire shell
surface. The posterior ridge is biangulate. The interdentum in
The anterior half of the valve is thickened compared with the
posterior half, and, when fresh, nacre in the anterior half of the shell tends to be salmon colored,
while nacre in the posterior half tends to be more iridescent. The shell has full dentation. In
addition to simple papillae, branched and arborescent papillae are often seen on the incurrent
aperture. In females, salmon colored demibranchs are often seen during the spawning season.
When fully gravid, females use all four demibranchs to brood glochidia (VDGIF 2014).
The Atlantic Pigtoe is a tachytictic (short-term) breeder, brooding young in early spring and
releasing glochidia in early summer. The Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and Shield Darter
(Percina peltata) have been identified as potential fish hosts for this species (O'Dee and Waters
2000). Additional research has found Rosefin Shiner (Lythrurus ardens), Creek Chub (Semotilus
atromaculatus), and Longnose Dace (Rhinichthys cataractae) are also suitable hosts (Wolf
2012). Eads and Levine (2012) found White Shiner (Luxilus albeolus), Satinfin Shiner
(Cyprinella analostana), Bluehead Chub (Nocomis leptocephalus), Rosyside Dace (Clinostomus
funduloides), Pinewoods Shiner (Lythrurus matutinus), Swallowtail Shiner (Notropis procne),
and Mountain Redbelly Dace (Chrosomus oreas) to also be suitable hosts for Atlantic Pigtoe.
2.2.2. Distribution and Habitat Requirements
Johnson (1970) reported the range of the Atlantic Pigtoe extended from the Ogeechee River
Basin in Georgia north to the James River Basin in Virginia; however, recent curation of the H.
D. Athearn collection uncovered valid specimens from the Altamaha River in Georgia (USFWS
2021a). In addition, USFWS (2021b) citing Alderman and Alderman (2014) reported two shells
from the 1880's that also documented the historical occurrence in the Altamaha River Basin. It
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 5

is presumed extirpated from the Catawba River Basin in North and South Carolina south to the
Altamaha River Basin (USFWS 2021a, USFWS 2021b). The general pattern of its current
distribution indicates that the species is currently limited to headwater areas of drainages and
most populations are represented by few individuals. In North Carolina, aside from the
Waccamaw River, it was once found in every Atlantic Slope River basin. Except for the Tar
River, it is no longer found in the mainstem of the rivers within its historic range within North
Carolina (Savidge et al. 2011). It is listed as Endangered in Georgia, South Carolina, and North
Carolina, and as Threatened in Virginia. It has a NatureServe rank of G1 (Critically Imperiled)
(Natureserve, 2018).
The Atlantic Pigtoe has been found in multiple physiographic provinces, from the foothills of the
Appalachian Mountains, through the Piedmont and into the Coastal Plain, in streams less than
one meter wide to large rivers. The preferred habitat is a substrate composed of gravel and
coarse sand, usually at the base of riffles; however, it can be found in a variety of other substrates
and lotic habitat conditions.
2.2.3. Threats to Species
The cumulative effects of several factors, including sedimentation, point and non -point
discharge, stream modification (e.g., impoundment, channelization), coupled with the apparent
restricted range, are believed to have contributed to the decline of this species throughout its
range (USFWS 2021a). When mussel populations are reduced to a small number of individuals
and are restricted to short reaches of isolated streams, they are extremely vulnerable to
extirpation from a single catastrophic event or activity (Strayer et al. 1996). Catastrophic events
may consist of natural events such as flooding or drought, as well as human influenced events,
such as toxic spills.
Siltation resulting from improper erosion control of various land usage, including agriculture,
silviculture, and development activities, has been recognized as a major contributing factor to
degradation of mussel populations (McLaughlin and Cope 2017). Siltation has been documented
to be extremely detrimental to mussel populations by degrading substrate and water quality,
increasing potential exposure to other pollutants, and by directly smothering mussels (Ellis 1936,
Marking and Bills 1979). Sediment accumulations of less than 1 inch have been shown to cause
high mortality in most mussel species (Ellis 1936).
Sewage treatment effluent has been documented to significantly affect the diversity and
abundance of mussel fauna (Goudreau et al. 1988). Goudreau et al. (1988) found that recovery
of mussel populations might not occur for up to two miles below points of chlorinated sewage
effluent. The impact of impoundments on freshwater mussels has been well -documented
(USFWS 1992, Neves 1993). Construction of dams transforms lotic habitats into lentic habitats,
which results in changes with aquatic community composition. These changes associated with
inundation adversely affect both adult and juvenile mussels as well as fish community structure,
which could eliminate possible fish hosts for glochidia (Fuller 1974).
The introduction of exotic species, such as the Asian Clam (Corbicula fluminea) and Zebra
Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), has also been shown to pose significant threats to native
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 6

freshwater mussels. The Asian Clam is now established in most of the major river systems in the
United States (Fuller and Powell 1973) including those streams still supporting surviving
populations of the Atlantic Pigtoe. Concern has been raised over competitive interactions for
space, food, and oxygen between this species and native mussels, possibly at the juvenile stages
(Neves and Widlak 1987, Alderman 1997). The Zebra Mussel, native to the drainage basins of
the Black, Caspian, and Aral Seas, is an exotic freshwater mussel that was introduced into the
Great Lakes in the 1980s and has rapidly expanded its range into the surrounding river basins,
including those of the South Atlantic Slope (O'Neill and MacNeill 1991). This species competes
for food resources and space with native mussels and is expected to contribute to the extinction
of at least 20 freshwater mussel species if it becomes established throughout most of the eastern
United States (USFWS 1992). This species has not been recorded in the Neuse River Basin.
Atlantic Pigtoe appears to be particularly sensitive to pollutants and requires clean, oxygen -rich
water for all stages of life. All the remaining Atlantic Pigtoe populations are generally small in
numbers and restricted to short reaches of isolated streams. The low numbers of individuals and
the restricted range of most of the surviving populations make them extremely vulnerable to
extirpation from a single catastrophic event.
2.2.4. Designated Critical Habitat
The Atlantic Pigtoe is listed as a Federally Threatened Species under the Endangered Species
Act (ESA) with Section 4(d) Rule and Critical Habitat Designation. In accordance with Section
4 of the ESA, Critical Habitat for listed species consists of:
(1) The specific areas within the geographical area occupied by the species at the time it is
listed, in which are found those physical or biological features (constituent elements) that
are:
a. essential to the conservation of the species, and
b. which may require special management considerations or protection
(2) Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species at the time it is listed
in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 of the Act, upon a determination by the
Secretary that such areas are "essential for the conservation of the species."
On November 16, 2021, USFWS listed the Atlantic Pigtoe as a Threatened species under the
ESA. Critical habitat was revised with the listing (86 FR 64000) and consists of the following
(USFWS 2021b):
• Unit 1 (JR1) - 29 river mi (46.7 river km) of Craig Creek in Craig and Botetourt
Counties, Virginia
• Unit 2 (JR2) - 1 mile (1.6-km) of Mill Creek in Bath County, Virginia
• Unit 3 (CR1) - 4 miles (6.6 km) of Sappony Creek in the Chowan River Basin in
Dinwiddie County, Virginia
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 7

• Unit 4 (CR2) - 64 river miles (103 river km) of the Nottoway River and a portion of
Sturgeon Creek in Nottoway, Lunenburg, Brunswick, Dinwiddie, and Greenville
Counties, Virginia
• Unit 5 (CR3) - 5 miles (8 km) of the Meherrin River in Brunswick County, Virginia
• Unit 6 (RR1) - 14 miles (22.5 km) of the Dan River in Pittsylvania County, Virginia and
Rockingham County, North Carolina
• Unit 7 (RR2) - 12 miles (19.3 km) of Aarons Creek in Granville County, North Carolina
and along the Mecklenburg County -Halifax County line in Virginia and North Carolina
• Unit 8 (RR3) —3 miles (4.8 km) of Little Grassy Creek in the Roanoke River Basin in
Granville County, North Carolina
• Unit 9 (TRl) - 91 miles (146.5 km) of the mainstem of the upper and middle Tar River as
well as several tributaries (Bear Swamp Creek, Crooked Creek, Cub Creek, and Shelton
Creek), in Granville, Vance, Franklin, and Nash Counties, North Carolina.
• Unit 10 (TR2) - 50 miles (80.5km) of Sandy/Swift Creek in Granville, Vance, Franklin,
and Nash Counties, North Carolina
• Unit 11 (TR3) - 85 miles (136.8 km) in Fishing Creek, Little Fishing Creek, Shocco
Creek, and Maple Branch located in Warren, Halifax, Franklin, and Nash Counties, North
Carolina
• Unit 12 (TR4) - 30 miles (48.3 km) of the Lower Tar River, lower Swift Creek and lower
Fishing Creek in Edgecombe County, North Carolina
• Unit 13 (NR1) - 60 river miles (95 river km) in four subunits including Flat River, Little
River, Eno River, and the Upper Eno River in Person, Durham, and Orange Counties,
North Carolina
• Unit 14 (NR2) - 61 river miles (98.2 river km) in five subunits including Swift Creek,
Middle Creek, Upper Little River, Middle Little River, and Contentnea Creek in Wake,
Johnston, and Wilson Counties, North Carolina
• Unit 15 (CFI) - 4 miles (6.4 km) of habitat in the New Hope Creek in Orange County,
North Carolina
• Unit 16 (CF2) - 10 river miles (16.1 river km) of Deep River in Randolph County, North
Carolina, including the mainstem as well as Richland Creek and Brush Creek
• Unit 17 (YRl) - 40 miles (64.4 km) of Little River in Randolph and Montgomery
Counties, North Carolina
*JR, CR, RR, TR, NR, CF and YR denote James River, Chowan River, Roanoke River, Tar
River, Neuse River, Cape Fear River and Yadkin River Basins, respectively.
Critical Habitat Unit 16 is the closest critical habitat unit, occurring >50 RM from the project
located on the Deep River (Figure 2-2).
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 8

3.0 SURVEY EFFORTS
Field efforts were conducted by Three Oaks personnel Tim Savidge (Permit #22-ES0034), Tom
Dickinson (Permit #22-ES00343), Lizzy Stokes -Cawley, Trevor Hall, Adrienne Lambert, and
Bryn Tracy on July 27, 2022 (TS, TD, TH), August 2, 2022 (TS, TD, LSC, TH, BT), and August
9, 2022 (TS, TD, TH, AL).
3.1. Stream Conditions at Time of Surveys
The following provides general descriptions of evaluated stream reach. Additional details are
provided in the results section.
3.1.1. Dry Creek
True to name, a large portion of the surveyed reach consisted of a dry channel during the survey
efforts. Wetted stream habitat was present in the lower reach as a series of pool habitats as well
as near the project crossing and extending upstream. The channel ranged from four to six meters
wide with banks up to one meter high that were generally stable. Substrate presented as rocky
with mixed cobble, gravel, and coarse sand being dominant and silt and sand in depositional
areas. Several areas of bedrock were present that provided grade control in the lower and middle
portions of the reach. Water ranged from light tannic to clear. Land use consisted of forest along
most of the stream with active agriculture surrounding. A wastewater pump station is present
near the downstream extent of the survey reach.
3.1.2. UT Cape Fear River
This small tributary consisted of a series of very shallow riffles, runs, and pools. Substrate
consisted of sand, silt, and clay primarily with a few areas of cobble/gravel in riffle habitats. The
channel ranged from two to four meters wide with banks one to three meters high, that ranged
from stable to undercut and eroded, especially in the lower reach. Banks consisted of clay,
saprolite, silt, and root mats. Water was clear to slightly turbid at time of the site visit. A wide
mature forested buffer surrounded the surveyed reach.
3.1.3. Cape Fear River Site I
This most upriver mainstem river site consisted of deeper run 0.6 to 1.2 meters deep. The
riverbank consisted of a clay and silt slope, with occasional woody debris and a riverbed with a
large proportion of bedrock and mixed silt, sand, gravel, and cobble substrates. Water was low
and clear at the time of the site visit. A wide river floodplain forest was present with active
agricultural use on the larger landscape.
3.1.4. Cape Fear River Site 2
This mainstem river site included a cross river rock structure with several cobble/gravel
vegetated bars/small islands and associated fast run/riffle habitats. The structure created cover
and pocket water that provided high quality habitat diversity. Below and above this area the
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 9

habitat consisted of run up to 1.2 meters deep. A variety of substrates were present from clay,
root mat, and silt banks along the river's margins to mixed bedrock, cobble, gravel, and sand in
the runs below and above the rock structure/bars. Water was low and clear at the time of the site
visit. A wide river floodplain forest was present with active agricultural use on the larger
landscape.
3.1.5. Cape Fear River Site 3
This site consisted of a reach in the left descending side channel along Fox Island. Habitat in the
side channel consisted of run with several shallow riffle breaks. Substrate was a high -quality mix
of sand, gravel, and cobble, with clay and stable woody debris lined banks and some silt
accumulations in depositional habitats. Water was low and clear at the time of the site visit. A
wide river floodplain forest was present with active agricultural use on the larger landscape.
3.2. Methodology
The reaches depicted in Figure 1 were surveyed with methodologies described below to evaluate
fish community and potential for Cape Fear Shiner and Atlantic Pigtoe.
3.2.1. Fish Surveys
Visual, electro-fishing, seine, and dip net surveys were conducted, as appropriate, in the reaches
depicted. All habitat types in the survey reach (riffle, run, pool, slack -water, etc.) were sampled,
with special attention given to transition areas between habitat types where fish congregate and
are confined in response to the instream sampling efforts. The survey efforts utilized one to two
Smith -Root LR-24 backpack electro-fishing units and dip -nets, with seine netting at Site 2 in the
Cape Fear. Fish captured were identified, counted and returned to the water shortly after
recovering. The surveys were also supplemented with visual survey techniques that were
performed during the mussel surveys.
Relative abundance reported was estimated using the following criteria:
➢ (VA) Very abundant > 30 collected at survey station
➢ (A) Abundant: 16-30 collected at survey station
➢ (C) Common: 6-15 collected at survey station
➢ (U) Uncommon: 3-5 collected at survey station
➢ (R) Rare: 1-2 collected at survey station
It should be noted that the numbers of particular species captured can be affected by survey
methodologies and site conditions. Thus, some species, particularly those that are found in
deeper pools and runs and those that can seek cover quickly, may be under -represented at a
sample site.
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 10

3.2.2. Mussel Surveys
Areas of appropriate habitat were searched, concentrating on the stable habitats preferred by the
target species. The survey team spread out across the site into survey lanes. Visual surveys were
conducted using glass bottom view buckets (bathyscopes) in stream sites and mask/snorkel in
Cape Fear River sites. Tactile methods were employed, particularly in streambanks and under
submerged rootmats. All freshwater bivalves were recorded and returned to the substrate.
Timed survey efforts provided Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) data for each species. Relative
abundance for freshwater snails and freshwater clam species were estimated using the following
criteria:
➢ (VA) Very abundant > 30 per square meter
➢ (A) Abundant 16-30 per square meter
➢ (C) Common 6-15 per square meter
➢ (U) Uncommon 3-5 per square meter
➢ (R) Rare 1-2 per square meter
➢ (P-) Ancillary adjective "Patchy" indicates an uneven distribution of the species within the
sampled site.
4.0 RESULTS
Results of the surveys are described below.
4.1. Dry Creek
A total of 930 electroshocking seconds were spent during which the species listed in Table 2
were located. Fish were only observed in the lower and upper 100 meters of the reach; the
remainder of the stream was dry.
Table 2. Fish survey results
Scientific Name
Common Name
Relative Abundance
Ameiurus natalis
Yellow Bullhead
A
Anguilla rostrata
American Eel
R
A hredoderus sa anus
Pirate Perch
R
Centrarchus macro terus
Flier
C
Esox americanus
Redfin Pickerel
C
Etheostoma olmstedi
Tessellated Darter
R
Gambusia holbrookii
Eastern Mos uitofish
A
Le orris auritus
Redbreast Sunfish
C
Le orris c anellus
Green Sunfish
U
Le orris macrochirus
Blue ill
C
Luxilus albeolus
White Shiner
R
Nocomis le toce halus
Bluehead chub
C
Semotilus atromaculatus
Creek chub
C
A total of 2.25 person hours of survey time were spent in the reach, during which no evidence of
mollusks was observed.
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 11

4.2. UT Cape Fear River
A total of 845 electroshocking seconds were spent during which the species listed in Table 3
were located.
Table 3. Fish survey results
Scientific Name
Common Name
Relative Abundance
A hredoderus sa anus
Pirate Perch
A
Esox americanus
Redfin Pickerel
C
Etheostoma olmstedi
Tessellated Darter
U
Gambusia holbrookii
Eastern Mos uitofish
C
Le orris c anellus
Green Sunfish
R
Nocomis le toce halus
Bluehead Chub
U
Notro is sce ticus
Sandbar Shiner
R
Semotilus atromaculatus
Creek chub
A
Umbra pygmaea
Eastern Mudminnow
R
A total of 2.5 person hours of survey time were spent in the reach, during which no evidence of
mollusks was observed.
4.3. Cape Fear River Site I
Due to water depth and habitat characteristics, visual surveys were conducted for fish at Site 1
with the species in Table 4 observed.
Table 4. Fish survey results
Scientific Name
Common Name
Relative Abundance
C rinella analostana
Satinfin Shiner
C
Etheostoma olmstedi
Tessellated Darter
C
Ictalurus punctatus
Channel Catfish
C
Le orris macrochirus
Blue ill
U
Micro terus punctulatus
Spotted Bass
C
Micro terus salmoides
Largemouth Bass
U
A total of 5 person hours of survey time were spent in the reach, with the species in Table 5
being found (Table 5).
Table 5. CPUE for Freshwater Mussels
Scientific Name
Common Name
# live
Abundance/
CPUE
Freshwater Mussels
CPUE
lliptio angustata
Carolina Lance
26
5.2/hr
lliptio complanata
Eastern Elliptio
304
60.8/hr
lliptio congaraea
Carolina Slabshell
43
8.6/hr
lliptio roanokensis
Roanoke Slabshell
233
46.6/hr
Freshwater Snails and Clams
Relative
Abundance
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 12

Scientific Name
Common Name
# live
Abundance/
CPUE
Corbicula fluminea
Asian Clam
A
Elimia catenaria
Gravel Elimia
A
elisoma anceps
Two -ridge Ramshorn
U
4.4. Cape Fear River Site 2
A total of 14 seine hauls and 350 electroshocking seconds to a seine were spent during which the
species listed in Table 6 were located.
Table 6. Fish survey results
Scientific Name
Common Name
Relative Abundance
Anguilla rostrata
American Eel
U
C rinella analostana
Satinfin Shiner
C
C rinella nivea
Whitefin Shiner
C
Etheostoma olmstedi
Tessellated Darter
U
Fundulus rathbuni
Speckled Killifish
C
Gambusia holbrookii
Eastern Mos uitofish
A
Le isosteus osseus
Lon nose Gar
U
Le orris auritus
Redbreast Sunfish
C
Le orris macrochirus
Blue ill
C
Micro terus punctulatus
Spotted Bass
C
Notro is amoenus
Comely Shiner
C
Notro is hudsonius
S ottail Shiner
U
Notro is sce ticus
Sandbar Shiner
VA
Noturus inst nis
Margined madtom
C
Percina crassa
Piedmont darter
U
A total of 6 person hours of mussel survey time were spent in the reach, with the species in Table
7 being found.
Table 7. CPUE for Freshwater Mussels
Scientific Name
Common Name
# live
Abundance/
CPUE
Freshwater Mussels
CPUE
lliptio angustata
Carolina Lance
98
16.3/hr
lliptio complanata
Eastern Elliptio
519
86.5/hr
lliptio congaraea
Carolina Slabshell
218
36.3/hr
lliptio roanokensis
Roanoke Slabshell
551
91.8/hr
ampsilis cariosa
ellow Lampmussel
1
0.2/hr
Freshwater Snails and Clams
Relative
Abundance
Corbicula fluminea
IAsian Clam
A
.Elimia catenaria
IGravel Elimia
I
A
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 13

Scientific Name
Common Name
# live
Abundance/
CPUE
eptoxis carinata
Crested Mudalia
U
hysella sp.
A Physid
PC
4.5. Cape Fear River Site 3
A total of 2,799 electroshocking seconds were spent during which the species listed in Table 8
were located.
Table 8. Fish survey results
Scientific Name
Common Name
Relative Abundance
Anguilla rostrata
American Eel
VA
C rinella analostana
Satinfin Shiner
C
C rinella nivea
Whitefin Shiner
U
Etheostoma olmstedi
Tessellated Darter
C
Etheostoma abellare
Fantail Darter
R
Gambusia holbrookii
Eastern Mos uitofish
C
ktalurus punctatus
Channel Catfish
U
Le orris auritus
Redbreast Sunfish
C
Le orris macrochirus
Blue ill
C
Micro terus punctulatus
Spotted Bass
C
Notro is sce ticus
Sandbar Shiner
A
Percina crassa
Piedmont darter
C
A total of 6.7 person hours of mussel survey time were spent in the reach, with the species in
Table 9 being found.
Table 9. CPUE for Freshwater Mussels
Scientific Name
Common Name
# live
Abundance/
CPUE
Freshwater Mussels
CPUE
lliptio angustata
Carolina Lance
107
16.0/hr
lliptio complanata
Eastern Elliptio
595
88.8/hr
lliptio congaraea
Carolina Slabshell
385
57.5/hr
lliptio roanokensis
Roanoke Slabshell
494
73.7/hr
Villosa delumbis
Eastern Creekshell
9
1.3/hr
Freshwater Snails and Clams
Relative
Abundance
Campleoma decisum
Pointed Campeloma
—
PU
Corbicula fluminea
Asian Clam
—
A
limia catenaria
Gravel Elimia
—
VA
eptoxis carinata
Crested Mudalia
—
U
elisoma anceps
Two -ridge Ramshorn
—
PU
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 14

5.0 DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS
The Cape Fear Shiner and Atlantic Pigtoe were not observed during these efforts; however,
suitable habitat and associate species were found. The two target species are discussed below.
5.1. Cape Fear Shiner
Since 1962, the Upper Cape Fear River (HUC 03030004) subpopulation has consistently been
represented by lower numbers of individuals than the two other subbasins (USFWS 2022b) and
from a current resiliency standpoint is considered "Very Unhealthy" (USFWS 2022b). Reasons
for the historically low numbers are unclear and could be related in part to sampling difficulty
(USFWS 2022b); however, several factors including habitat modification and increasing
development pressures have been identified as potentially jeopardizing the continued persistence
of the species within this subpopulation (USFWS 2022b).
Based on the surveys conducted for this project, coupled with the ones conducted during the
species status assessment (USFWS 2022b), the Cape Fear Shiner is currently unlikely to occur
within the project area; however, given the presence of suitable habitat, associate species, and
connectivity to occupied habitats, the presence of Cape Fear Shiner cannot be totally discounted.
If the species does occur within the project area, the numbers are expected to be very low. Given
the paucity of recent records adverse effects to the species are unlikely to occur as a result of
project construction. As such it can be concluded that the project is unlikely to adversely affect
the Cape Fear Shiner. Strict adherence to erosion control standards should minimize the
potential for any adverse impacts to occur.
5.2. Atlantic Pigtoe
Although the Atlantic Pigtoe has been recorded from the mainstem Cape Fear River within the
project area, it has not been found since 1990 (Table 1). There are generally few records of the
Atlantic Pigtoe within the entire Cape Fear River Basin compared to other basins within the
species range (Johnson 1970, NCWRC Unpublished database, Three Oaks personal
observations). The reasons for the limited number of records from the basin and in particular the
mainstem of the Cape Fear River are unclear.
The surveys conducted for this project indicate the Cape Fear River supports robust populations
of a number of freshwater mussel species. While the Atlantic Pigtoe was not detected during
these surveys and has not been observed in this portion of the river its presence cannot be
entirely discounted. Kovalak et al. (1986) statistically demonstrated that a rare species might not
be detected in a survey until several thousand individuals have been examined. The difficulty in
detecting a freshwater mussel species that is rare within a population was demonstrated during
the surveys conducted for this project, as only one individual Yellow Lampmussel was detected
out of a combined total of 3,583 mussels found during these efforts. At the site where it was
found 1,386 other mussels were located. This one individual could easily have been missed
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 15

during the survey and a conclusion of "absent" would have been erroneous. Given the paucity of
recent records adverse effects to the species are unlikely to occur as a result of project
construction. As such it can be concluded that the project is unlikely to adversely affect the
Atlantic Pigtoe. Strict adherence to erosion control standards should minimize the potential for
any adverse impacts to occur.
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 16

6.0 LITERATURE CITED
Alderman, J. M. 1997. Monitoring the Swift Creek Freshwater mussel community. Unpublished
report presented at the UMRCC symposium on the Conservation and Management of
Freshwater Mussels II Initiative for the Future. Rock Island, IL, UMRCC.
Conrad, T.A. 1834. New freshwater shells of the United States, with coloured illustrations; and a
monograph of the genus Anculotus of Say; also a synopsis of the American naiades. J.
Dobson, 108 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 1-76, 8 pls.
Eads, C.B. and J.F. Levine. 2012. Refinement of Growout Techniques for Four Freshwater
Mussel Species. Final Report submitted to NC Wildlife Resources Commission, Raleigh,
NC. 15pp.
Ellis, M. M. 1936. Erosion Silt as a Factor in Aquatic Environments. Ecology 17: 29-42.
Fuller, S.L.H. 1974. Clams and mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia). In: Pollution ecology of freshwater
invertebrates, ed. C.W. Hart and S.L.H. Fuller, 215-73. New York: Academic Press.
Fuller, S. L. H. and C. E. Powell. 1973. Range extensions of Corbicula manilensis (Philippi) in
the Atlantic drainage of the United States. Nautilus 87(2): 59.
Goudreau, S. E., R. J. Neves, and R. J. Sheehan. 1988. Effects of Sewage Treatment Effluents on
Mollusks and Fish of the Clinch River in Tazewell County, Virginia. USFWS: 128 pp.
Howard, A.K. 2003. Influence of instream physical habitat and water quality on the
survival and occurrence of the endangered Cape Fear shiner. M.S. Thesis. North
Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 133 pp.
Johnson, R.I. 1970. The systematics and zoogeography of the Unionidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of
the southern Atlantic slope region. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology.
140: 263 -449.
Kovalak, W. P., S. D. Dennis, and J.M. Bates. (1986). Sampling Effort Required to Find Rare
Species of Freshwater Mussels. Rationale for Sampling and Interpretation of Ecological
Data in the Assessment of Freshwater Ecosystems. Philadelphia, PA, American Society for
Testing and Materials: 34-45.
Marking, L.L., and T.D. Bills. 1979. Acute effects of silt and sand sedimentation on freshwater
mussels. Pp. 204-211 in J.L. Rasmussen, ed. Proc. of the UMMCC symposium on the
Upper Mississippi River bivalve mollusks. UMRCC. Rock Island IL. 270 pp.
McLaughlin, R.A., Cope, G.W. 2017. Erosion, Sediment, and Turbidity Control and Monitoring
Research to Meet Water Quality Goals. North Carolina Department of Transportation.
https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54537/dot-54537 DSI.pdf
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 17

Neves, R.J. 1993. A state of the Unionids address. Pp. 1-10 in K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan,
and L.M. Kooch, eds. Proc. of the UMRCC symposium on the Conservation and
Management of Freshwater Mussels. UMRCC. Rock Island IL.189 pp.
Neves, R. J. and J. C. Widlak. 1987. Habitat Ecology of Juvenile Freshwater Mussels (Bivalvia:
Unionidae) in a Headwater Stream in Virginia. American Malacological Bulletin 1(5): 1-
7.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP). 2022. North Carolina Natural Heritage
Data Explorer. https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/. April 2022 version.
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC). 2020. North Carolina State Wildlife
Action Plan. Addendum 1. https://www.ncwildlife.org/plan#67182254-2020-addendum-
1-document-downloads
O'Dee, S.H., and G.T. Waters. 2000. New or confirmed host identification for ten freshwater
mussels. Pp. 77-82 in R.A. Tankersley, D.I. Warmolts, G.T. Waters, B.J. Armitage, P.D.
Johnson, and R.S. Butler (eds.). Freshwater Mollusk Symposia Proceedings Part I.
Proceedings of the Conservation, Captive Care and Propagation of Freshwater Mussels
Symposium. Ohio Biological Survey Special Publication, Columbus.
O'Neill, C. R., Jr., and D. B. MacNeill. 1991. The zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha): an
unwelcome North American invader. Sea Grant, Coastal Resources Fact Sheet. New
York Sea Grant Extension. 12 pp.
Pottern, G.B. 2009. 2007 Status update of the Cape Fear shiner Notropis mekistocholas. Report
to the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 27 pp.
Savidge, T. W., J. M. Alderman, A. E. Bogan, W. G. Cope, T. E. Dickinson, C. B. Eads,S. J.
Fraley, J. Fridell, M. M. Gangloff, R. J. Heise, J. F. Levine, S. E. McRae, R.B. Nichols,
A. J. Rodgers, A. Van Devender, J. L. Williams and L. L. Zimmerman. 2011. 2010
Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater and Terrestrial Mollusks in
North Carolina. Unpublished report of the Scientific Council on Freshwater and
Teresstrial Mollusks. 177pp.
Snelson, F.F., Jr. 1971. Notropis mekistocholas, a new herbivorous cyprinid fish
endemic to the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina. Copeia 1971(3): 449-462.
Strayer, D. L., S. J. Sprague and S. Claypool, 1996. A range -wide assessment of populations of
Alasmidonta heterodon, an endangered freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae). J.N.
Am. Benthol. Soc., 15(3):308-317.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water. NPDES facilities by permit type.
NPDESPERMIT_WMERC. Accessed August 2022.
https://watersgeo.epa. ov�/arcgis/rest/services/OWPROGRAM/NPDESPERMIT_WMER
C/MoServer
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 18

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants;
Determination of Endangered Species Status and Designation of Critical Habitat for Cape
Fear Shiner. 50 CFR 17 FR . Docket No. 87-22200
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1988. Cape Fear Shiner Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 18 pp.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1992. Special report on the status of freshwater
mussels.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1996. Revised Technical/Agency Draft Carolina
Heelsplitter Recovery Plan, Atlanta, GA: 47.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2011. Draft Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas)
Strategic Habitat Conservation Framework, Raleigh, NC, 27 pp.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021a. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and
Plants: Threatened Species Status with Section 4(d) Rule and Designation of Critical
Habitat for Atlantic Pigtoe. 50 CFR 17:86 FR 64000, 64000-64053. Docket Nos. FWS-
R4-ES-2018-0046FF09E21000 FXES 1111090FEDR 223.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021b. Species Status Assessment Report for the
Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni) Version 1.4.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022a. Information for Planning and Consultation
(IPaC). Accessed August 2022.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/YFD5VVYMWJCOVF2QMLWX5VCIY4/resou
rces
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022b. Species Status Assessment Report for the Cape
Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) Version 1.0
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022c. Species Profile for the Cape Fear Shiner.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF). 2014. Atlantic Pigtoe
Conservation Plan. Bureau of Wildlife Resources. VDGIF, Richmond, VA. 31 pp.
Wolf, E.D. 2012. Propagation, Culture, and Recovery of Species at Risk Atlantic Pigtoe.
Virginia Tech Conservation Management Institute, Project No. 11-108. 55pp.
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 19

APPENDIX A
Figures

� EFR�NPrepared For
.., [iFGREENFIELD
y:, o
Protected Aquatic Species Survey
Capeton Development
Project Vicinity & Survey Reaches
Harnett County, North Carolina
oateSeptember 2022
Scale: 0 850 1,700 Feet
I
Job No.
22-324
Drawn By
Checked By.
TD
TE
Figure

'A
1
q}� EO ID 32
1 � GG
Unit 2
a
57
k�EE0 1D123910 /5 8
8. �A 8. %
a
r I r
89
���r;'�.✓ Holl Springs
g
8.1 � �;40
e r NC SS r
uquay-Varina
�.
H9 c
\` G� of R,vFTT ��._N�-In
EO-ID;� 91 ��- �� UNTy
EO ID 23981
rE;O ID 23691 _
,EO ID 23691
Site Location
NCNHP Element Occurrence: Cape Fear Shiner
Current EO
Historical EO
- Critical Habitat: Cape Fear Shiner
County Boundary
Stream
INEER/y�Prepared For
,y
W r`�GREENF'IELD
0
�►33N
EO-ID,23691
Rove
Safe Park \ f U-", 4U l
us
Protected Aquatic Species Survey
Capeton Development
NCNHP Element Occurrence and
Critical Habitat: Cape Fear Shiner
Harnett County, North Carolina
t_iilinyt
1i
periStree`Nlap (arid)
DateSeptember
2022
Scale 0
'
5,500 11,000 Feet
' '
Job No
22-324
Drawn By
TDH
Checked By.
TED
-SA
Figure
2-1

140 aha EO ID 8012 8ollsof
r Unit # 13 5ecor„
Unit # 15 �` � fonds _
� � Durham
'" EO ID 25468
_ l
s r EO I D 2227$
us
EO ID 18327
EO,ID
22274 Unit# 16
EO ID 22292
EO ID 7388 \
0
Site Location
NCNHP Element Occurrence: Atlantic Pigtoe
Current EO
Historical EO
Critical Habitat: Atlantic Pigtoe
Stream
INEEft Prepared For
,y
W �`,GR$EIVF'IELD
0
�►33N
Protected Aquatic Species Survey
Capeton Development
NCNHP Element Occurrence and
Critical Habitat: Atlantic Pigtoe
Harnett County, North Carolina
y
O I D,14599
t`4
!l
Morrisville \
�- — /
/Caryl
EO•ID 34956
IRLI.,j"5PrIRgS
NayfVaa
,ryfj
EO ID 3997
EO ID'24770
r
)!contributors CC -BY
Ix
Date: September 2022
Scale Q 12,500 25,000 Feet
l ' 1
Job No
22-324
Drawn By
Checked By.
TDH
TED
Figure
2-2

APPENDIX B
Select Photographs
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 4

Awl.- 1 F
Photo 2: UT Cape Fear
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 2

A4. -
Photo 3: Cape Fear Site 1
oyt.
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 3

Photo4: Cape Fear Site 2
Cupcton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022

5
.56
I ��- -•�4 rY�'��1��'�io
a r`� 'k`� X '"y > s5`
P�fi'.
1,7
'73.

'40• �rm,ur ��w 00
000
0000
0i
;00 ;• 00r''rrrr0rrr+,
i166rP r r~ 0 , 0*♦rr♦♦♦ 4
r�� ♦ r rM
- fl 1f
40
Photo 6: Shiners captured at Cape Fear Site 2
kv, E;L*�0
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 6

.L "'(•" w,� i-t dam• - }: f
_. '' •ifs I.; `�.']L ••.." i1. \ 4 3"�• •• �
Al
AN
k #�� �T �_

Photo 8: Eastern Elliptio (left), Carolina Slabshell (top right), and Roanoke Slabshell (bottom)
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 8

J

Photo 10: Yellow Lampmussel
Capeton Aquatic Species Survey Report October 2022
Job# 22-324 Page 10

z
m
i 1
/ `\
/ I \
N. N.
\ .... •. �r / I
.... . . . .. . .
• - -• EX. WETLANDS : -
\
\Y421waft
• .• . • awft
\ \
/ .. . • • • ' - ` • MULTI -FAMILY
K"
/ • • COMMERCIAL
i./ EASEMENT •• z l i
•:� civic
...... _ _ ' EX. WETLANDS -
\
■
MIAMI
FAMA I MA UA TY
t
wilzAll LWE
AMENITY/COMMERCIAL —
� r
_ \ FEMA 100-YEAR • • ' • , ° 1 � `_ `~ `—- \ �— \ °
pirm��� FEMA 100-YEAR
I / • \ - - - - EX. 50' PNG �� _
I_ ..-.-' .•. EASEMENT \ _
I \ , EX.WETLANDS
\-. \
/ I \ CAPE FEAR RIVER
� ` \
dow
\ y
� I
HARNETT COUNTY WWTP I /
I T
I
LEGEND
No Permit Required
Individual Permit
Permitted By Others
A"I
aW
Z
0
W
a
Q
V
0
011
3
3
LL
Z
0
w
Z
U
Z
z
0
z_
J
J
J
CN
U/
PRELIMINARY
NOT APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
0 200 400
W- E
SCALE: 1 inch = 400 ft.
s
Exhibit 1
WR Job No. DATE
02201372 10/25/2022
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
OVERALL
SITE PLAN
I1

A B D
LnI
- �,I Ill, -\\ ,1 \ �� ( \ \'� \II��\� \\ //\ J\� i 1'I/ I I' "' I� �� j / (� �///��\\\�� ��%�-� j ' ,jam \ /r/ �_ l�\� - \\ --\ -- \// r I I�r � 1 \1'11\\\\ll�) I \l� �Ij i ��� �-11 \\ \1(�`�� �''llfl/j//j /��v�% , jl1/1��1� -� I ) / 1I III((I� I �
I \ \ \ / 1 _ // 11 \ / \\ I I I \ \ \\� \ �/ / / / �! \ \\ 11 ( l � �� J \ \ �\ , - - \ I 11 \ \ \ \\ 1 \\ // \ \ \ \� Jll I I ///� / �/ l / /I I II I I
-- ( \`1 \� �111 \�/ �\\� / J \I\ ��\ - / j � \ \�\ ll' I 1 \ \\\� \�� (� \ // \ , / 1 l� _J I Ill\ \ \1 \\ \\\ \ e �ii/////�, I I / _ \\�,
\ \ , \ / \ l \ �� \ \ \-J _� l�/ll/\\\��// //� 1) \\ /��\ J / \ j\\ ) \ I \\ �\\�\\\ll,� (l = \\\\\\\\\\\\://lIl//1///��//1� /�///�/ �-� ( lllllllllll/ II 1 \ \ I \ 1 I I I I I '���111 \\� �I)
\ \\ I 1 �, I \ -- �- - I� IIL� �\ �/ � \ "�� \ \\\ \\\� \`/ \\ \ ) //j // �\�\�/� = //�1 /( \((I(f� \\\\`) /_- J) 1 \ I \\ \\\ \\\� --1 l \\ \\\\\\,/ 11 / / / / l I / l / l ` \ //r
\ \ \ -, I )1\� ,;� / II --// //� \ \\ :\� \\ // //� \�� /_ � - �I JJI �/-/:- \ = J� l / / \ \\ \ \1 �� \\\\\\\\���1�1/ lI _�11 ///%///� Jlllllllll \\ \\ \ l 1/l Ill ( l -\�
\\\ �, \ I \,, J- �� \-\�--/ ( ( \\\\ \ \ �� \ �� / I ti/ /���,� /�\ �J/JJ I / 1\\1>// /)J ✓ \�\\\\\\\\_/i///�/ I / / / / /j�// ` I I / I (I ///
\ \\ \_III 1\ \� i / / )) \ \� /� 1 > \\' i�( -�/ / \\�/// 1//l I I - / ) �)l \ \\\ \\\�-, /� �\\\ \ / // /- //i ( l Il l \ 1 \ J / -/;
\\ �_ �\ \ ��,- I /--\ \ — //)lam II \ \ \ \ \) \� I II\ </ _ / / \ ' I / /�-- _-/ - / \�� \\\\ ///// / / //jl 1 I /// / \ \ \� `/ ///)j/� _/
\\\\ -\ \ �=� 1\--/�/\ \\- �\ \� // \\� r /-���\\�- �ii III / / - l I) I( �/ \ �\ \\\\\�\ /// / / / /// �-Tl / /
l I� - \-_- / r/ �/ � �1 - \ (// \ 1\ I / �iJ \ --�- / i�/�\\\\� //�1111/// \ \ i %�- -/� `\ I I) \) )( \�//.\\ \\\\\\\ / / ///1 1 / ///1 �1 �fi fi-\ /
\\\\ ���\ \\ ��/ \� - _ - - _ �� II I �� \ (�\ `� 1 I / \ \ \�/� \\\\\\\� \ f / - 1 / ) t JI (I(�-I (�� I ' \ \\ \\ = J \ \ \�\\\ \\\\�j// /i / //�/iJ I j/l \\\\ l I // //' / I 11 I I / / / /r/�
_ \ \\� �_ �\ �� \\ _ �\ \ `\� - // ) /�� _ - \ 1j \ \ / � / J 11 l I J // r -
�` \ \ �/% 1 -\�,/ ,�\ __ \ \� , / \ \\ �_) \ \ \�\\\ /,// III \ 1 III Ill( -
\\\ \�� ` - \ \ ) l \ \ o \\ \ l // - )1 � �// �\\ _= j% \\\\�\` \ \ \ / / / - l / / \ I 1 \ \\\\ \ / // /// i/% 111 III ( - \ I I / I I
_�� - \ - - � �/ (ll / /��� \ -\�� \\\ 1 /I //�/�-\� //l I), - //4--,� �\�\ �\\ \\ / / / - , \I\ 1 \\ \ - — \\ \\�\ 'i//% ' �// I I I1 - �/ 1 ( I J/l Ir I /�
t \�� _— �\ \/( �_- /�\\ ( \\\\ , ���/ /-//ii\>//%-,\= \\\�\\\�\\ \t \I / b�l//�j�1\\\\\\ \�\��/////^\//�///Ir(e///ll� 111111(il 111 / / ti� I �)1(i Z'llf�l j
\ /� -\� - _ 1 ( /I ` \\r \\ \ �I((((({ �/� /\\ -// / �// / /ice\� �\\� l/ J(I�l� l I \\\ \_- \ / \\\ �\- /// \1 / -� I I IIIII I / / / Ir/ II
/ �\ — _�/ \/ 1% / // �� - /�/ i /�r \� �\\\\���\��1 / ///� 11� J If \l1\\\�\ /%i\\ ��\\�_ ��/i/�\ //j)/�l� (%l JII I1I I I \ (% \ (I I �I�\(
��\ - > �I -—_ _ / _ \\ \ / �\ / / ( \ ) �� (\�,� \ / / v l I II III\ \ ( /\ I I I I I « \/
��� r /i J)I �� - % > \- C` \ /��//�/ " \//// -_ \\\ \\\ rC -> l/1///�/�1/�\ \\\\ \\� ��\\� / \� �/ IIIIIJI 11 \ \ \ �_ II III ?� �I ��\
��e / �— ==_ / / f \l —�/// \////ice /—//�\�— —�� \\\\\\\ `\\ /1 //�/�\ \� \ \�� _ \ �/ \\\//// �� / III\ \ \ \ -11I I ° . �' 1 \ \\\\
— ` ' / r _ i/i—\ _� / / \ ti —\ / // — / / _ \ \ \\fin // / — -- — --\ \\ / — /` / \ \\ / ( �/ ) \
--��� f J l \ \ / ��\\ %\ J \ \ \ \ \/// \/j// y\\\�\ \ //% // \ \ \ �- \ / /-\ �/ / / // \\ \ \ \ 1rt1-
J \ �- // s\ �i �� �� \ \ / // \�//-- - -/ - \\\\ \\\\ ///l�// l =-- \ \ �// - / i//f I\\ \ \\\ 1 w'/ J
,// /� P �- / / \\\✓ \ / - I I ,I / //,, \�=i�/�� - /�/�--� L -- \\$� \\\\�//-- / /� � � - `��� \ �\\�`/ �- _ \\ \\\\ \\\\ \ \ J I \IIIIII� �, -\ \
// \ \`�// � / —/ � / ( J\ \ \\ �\\ ram' �j/�� /i G 1 \-1)/J/� / ) ��\ � ��i� � — — \ = 1 / \ l
l// %`� \ - -� - ///� 1 /\\ \1)\� /�s\- // /- ( //%\ ( - / J Jam\\`= s==- 1 4� ���� \ \ �� \ / \ \ \ / \\ \\\ 1\\ // / I
1 I�(\ �J \ / - \ (_\1 I I lI \\ /L„�s -_ //1 y, /l` �j j �- �/� \`I / r s ,�_� / \ ] �> > \ /^ \ 1 1 \J \ ) /J /i/���\ \1 1 \ ��— �� / Il / !1/�/IIII1111 I I / ��
\\ \ _ �- '� / ( ( / ) ( \ - / �� / / // \�\ s,/�--�r \mil �i ( �� ( ( / r /, ,,,///-_ _\ \\ J \ \\\� 1 \\ \ (-1 I I -,�l-I I % /
\\\� / / \ / �- /�� /-_ I \\ \\ J o_� �/ 1�) \ // 1 �J/�,rrr� ��� 1 /� /r) l 1/=-`� r�/// _= ��-r \\1 I II\1111 \\ \�--- /("T� I /'�'(/ /
\ l — \ \\ //j / ) \\ 1 / / �J - = -� J �i; i%� \ \ �� \ 11 / IIII II 1 /
\\\\ , �/ \ \ / 1 -_- \--� �\ _�� y.-.u:. �� \\ <\ /� �-1 ���\\`-�E - \ /� �J� /� /%/// \ / J 1 \ \\� \ I I(II I)(l\�\\ /
�/1 / _ \ - l //� r \ \ - / \ / \ \ \ \
1 / \ \ \ — 7` / \ \ \ / s n \ \\\ \ \\\ \ / i / / �� \\ — / \ / \ J / / \ \ \\ \� \ \
/ \ /> % - c - Z �\ s __... _ \� J j �Y ( �� �\\�i\ \�� J /� i /'J� ��/ / - / \ i \�� rr / \ / I l / I \ I 1 //
\ � \\ \ - , - �\ \ \ \ ' w := - // \ ///%)1111 \\\\\\\\ �\ I / ✓ - / \� \���� \�� // / � - .� �� /ii/i//��� /�j/ \\ \ \\� _�/ \ i/ / \\ � / J /) / l \ 11 I I \ I�I
1 \ - \\ \\\\\ / / / / / / / /� / \ / \ / / / \ I I I I /
�\ / - � � \\ - � � \ \ \ \ �� - / 1 >/�/ / {•'::; •. ^ ,�` 11 �(//�///�(IIII �s �\ I I t /i/! \_ �� \\0�� =- - _ /� / //%/ / ,IJ�JI� ��\\\\ 'ice _ \� / ) \ \ JI/ 1 / lI I I \ // �l /-)=I `fit', I
III / \ \� \ - --, \ f �-\\\\� \ - Jam/ 1 io( °, `�f / �� Fcy )I ( �� �-\— \ '! _- �- �/ /�i//��//�� \\\� �i / i� \ / l \ ` //// I I \ 11 / // / / /1 /�"(
\�� %� ^ ��� - \ \ \ - - L „ (� = ; ) / �- \{ qR RN �2 I l / \ \ -_- \\ 1 \\ �-= _ , - /�/�/ /� // / 1L \ _ �1 \ J \ - / I T l /l // / � / J /! / / /
/ \ � \� - - /, \\ \ \ ` - - \�o / �\\ NF F� z I / /// �\ 11 l� \\ �\ - / / \ - \ / l I / j / %j/ l / l ( I
F T ����_ —
( ) \ k T \ ( / \ — r l
�� \� \\\ \ /�/��\ \ \\ - - o '' \/� 1(� \,�� s \ ` ` \ III1111\ \ \ \ \ r��1� ��/��J - //�� 1 / f ? � � I- _ 1 \ � � �` !�//� / / //,/ , \ I�
\ \ ---\ / / 11 \\\\ \\ `-\ } ;:.: �(\// (li JI B�� �\ R/ to \\\IIII(II�/� 1 III 1\\ \\\\ ,-- / L�--� / 7- -\ \ / ° \ -1 I/ �%/i / I
��� �� \ � \ \� \ I \ \ - - z - \\ r 60; ;:r ;. I1 \\ \\ \ \ 11 �/ J I 1II\\\\ ' \ _ - -- \ \ l i/ // // r
�/ \ _ � \ \ :=::: :; ::- :: \ I I ( -� = �1 l Ill\ \ \ / / �� / // // 1 /l�l _ ,
r I I �L// \� , �\ \ ' �/ - \ 2 ///t I I 1 \ I 1 I 30' RIPARIAN S� ( / // / / , - ��\ / i
�\\lll \ /\� l \ \ ,,\ /i I I ` \�- \ \ �rr - �\ \1 I) \ lT \ \ \\ \� -`i / J / y / \ - \ \ \ �� �( �/ l 1
\ \ �� t \ \ / s // / I I \ \ \ \ ::.:--a-:- : `:`::.::; (: i';':. :::- / BUFFER \\\ ( ( v� \ \\\ \\ \ \ I `� - / \\ / / / / \ / / / / ^I \ / / \ '= / \ \ (��\� j i / / / / / I
\\\\� l \ -�- /e // I I \ 1 \ \ \ I 1 >>o ...... i.�.� .. .. y =' K ( �_\_��- \�\ \\ I I - -/ J)J / / l� r J / I / - \ _ \ / \ \ ��� - / 1 �� ,
\ >> \� l� - \ \ \ �/i \ )) 1 1 \ \ / \ \ Ex. )/ 1lll I \\\�\\ �� _\ l�� - r J 11 I - / / /� / / / 1 1 / / \ �\ \ \ \ /\� // / �/11
-- \ - Z / - / :WETLANDS -- % 1 ( ( /`�� ) I // \ '/ l \-- I \ ll)/ / / l//fJ \ 1
\� r L1 �\ \- -- \ -^�/ �� // \\ \ r\ �' ' $.: (TYP.)::"{.off: :• \\ (//I II JII III1111\�� '� \ ' ��� -��� i / /l( I / / / / / / \� -'� \ / -\` \ I I -/!�/ / / ( / / 1
��\� 1 �� `� -� // / / \ \ 1 1� f tz�. II I I 1�\\0\ \� � �I I j1)( f l / J f \ (\ JI \ �� \ /J//l/ z / 1 l I I
/ \ 1 \ �� _ = , _� // I \ y::.:G:::`--: :::: off':: �. �;::; . ..;: \\ (/ I I I 1 s. \\ �_��= _ �/ / I 1 \ 1 I ( l l I / / \ ) \ ( \ \ l /` l / \ \
>>\\ /l /> \_ �� -� / I \ \ I \\ \ /(� " •• .• s$ -r�-:• -- =- ex: . : `\�I\ I//I� �I( Io.l\\�\ \ ��\ - --� / 11 / \J1 �' l� / / I J 1 =� \\�� ( l/ 1 /(� /i
//jam\ / �\- - / \� J1 /(1 \ \\ \ \ \� -�o �� ::�:t: i.;' .E: ; ^/I h / I \\�\\\\�\ \\\�\ - _`� I ( I I \ -� / / 1 f \ \ �; \ \ ' \ �� �\ O /'l� // \ \ \
f// / i\��\\ \\\ 11 ��= 1 //( \ \\\\\ C3 •' (' • I \ EX.TOPOF \\\�\\ \ \\ \\� \ \ Z-=-__��- —.� 1 r- J/ / //\ \ 1- � \\`��/ / i� \ /// / r i i( I \ I
��_��\\\ �\ ��� J ll( \ - \ rn . . \60. 1p., �I BANK \ \\\� \ /W \\\' �\ \�8\\ 195�\ ✓�-���-� �� _- - - / \\ \ ( \\ / / _
/Zl \ \\ /I11 /i--1 \\� \ \\ \= l ° 1a5 • \� \) :.I I( �\\\\�1$\\\\ \�- I-- \�[ =-� -- J/� (/ �j-_-_--/J \� \ \\ I �` / -_ J �/� (�1 / I \
/ �% \ I( / 7 _ \ \ \ \ \ 5 , I 1'"I �� f�\ J �Z � //J)) �= �\�\\ \�\\\ 190 \ �' \ j i_� � � � = � _ _ _ _ / � �� \ \ \ �� / / — _ — — — �j I J \\\ ' l� C �`
y /�\�� )� 1// !//� - J/ \ \ �� 16 /� o \ 1\\�� >1//)r (I(��-\�\, \, 185\ �� -- --� s,-/- �^ 1 \ = �_ __-___- �/� \ \\\ ) - -- �\ �1 )1J�I 1
r ) l\�\\ ^��/IJ ��1 ` 1 \ l�'SL • :� /(/l `�� ��\\\�'S\ \ `J� `\\\\� //��% � 19� \?°�\ �� -^—� —��� � \\\\ �--/,/ J/� — �_ �` -:_/ - \l (" //l /!l
/ \ f \ \\ �(IIIl ��_- - J / 160 :; . 155 .. '::: -; .' ( 1 (� \\��� / �19p � � / j - \ \\\\ ( +C��= - - \ \ -- w-�i-- - / ( J
1� \ 1 \ �� 1 \ 1\\� / \\ \� 1 \ 2 � / 85 \\ EX. WETLANDS :. \ \' \ / l( / 1 /J _ _� - - V / / I
155 a._' �I( \\\\ \\ / \ \ \�I 175 \ \ \ \ / ^ \� /
\ \ \ \ �\\ \\ - % �..:;.': r-: \ \ \ \\� �� \ \1 \ \ \` \ \7 ^1 \\� :. \ \\\ \ /� / / � EX. WETLANDS (TYP.) _ 1%. �p -- 200 \ z / J / > \ \\ \ / (� 11
\ ) \ -\\ \\\\\ 1 /1 ��s T . •• h / s \ \ -, \ �\ - _ '� \ \\ ) \ co �\\`\��\\�\✓ I''!!�%/ - �' o ` Z � 11 �% /� ` `\\` l)il}1�—� /,
\ \ - �`�\\ \ JSp V / 'o / \ \ r \ (() 170 `\\ �L - (TYP. I : r - 7\ \ / r . -! / / / e/ \ \ I ( (
\ \�\ l / i os\� \ \ /// / / / f l/ 1a5. Aso / (/ \ \�\\ _ ),I((
/ % ::: '\\ =�// �
\ -- ti \'s o :: i // �/ / ;_ ` / \ t = 1; ���/ % --k.i I i l \ \\� \ \� \/ /) / i ����/ // /% ' // , -�_ \� \ \ \ \\ E. �' 421
/� , l \� \ 16 ' 1$0 ' r�� //� / / / ! _ \ \ 165 \� \ \ — \ — _ / � �///// :. 1 �/ l / / 1 // 1�� / // ^ ' • . '/� c� — J / — \ CORN \\\\ I
\ \ / — — J — \ \ \�� j1 co 0 •D C • /� ,r ^b _ _ %/ / \ \i \ 1 \ �% \�� // \\ \ // /f oo / \ �� �- — \ L \ / f \ Hq ELlus > ` r
�� ( \\� \\\i�/ �� F`:. / _ j I // I \\\ \— \\\��� __180_—//(���/// /': // \`\���//l/��/j/_ ) 1 0 — �` ��� \ /�\ RNET BL \�J-��
\ I ! C 1 \ \ l 1a0� / f / % \ \ 1 160 '\ \� — — _ ( \ J // / < \�\ �/ �/ 1 _ ' ) — �� �� \ 1/w R VO /
— ��� \\ S ® • 15 • b� +` I ` \ \ \ \ , \ / /� 1 0 / _ / /i �t // l • / :: :.. l X \ \y/t/\ -, �.
'_::?• I 1 � \� s� Q \ \� /' �i ice/ 4 EX. WETLANDS TYP.
\ \ . EX. WETLANDS (TYP.) O.: - - 1q$ O 1 :. I / I / \ I r �\ - \\ \\ \ , �/� i Y �/���j������� �!/1 / J / I ( ( / �L ��� / i � � .
/ \ --) -C }}:;�::: \ I I ( t 1 a / // : s / so , \ ° \ \ I � \ -
\ !� I : F. .. ::. \\ 150 1 ✓ 16 / / 1- / ' \ /,/// / 1( c- C J 185 1 / 0 /� / I (� J -�
\ -\ / of C / _ •:�:�:� :.r,:.'` \ • ©< / / ��' \ 160 1 I r 0 - t 160 / �(! / % ' • _�t 1� 1\ r� y / ^ 1 \ / J / �\� \ \ \ ) ` \ \ ( / / \\\ ( 1 -
-- 1$0 ` \\\ J \ I I / ` �( I •� \� �C /"per . - ��/� -\ \ \\
C') \ �\ � /r \ l '?� :#:-:- �\ . \ - . o - 145 / l / L) / • • �6s 1 � //� �\ ��OJ b • • 1 J/ \� \ \/y^/ \ J� \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \,( / ( \ � / `_ J .
/�~\ (- \ / : \ — \ ��� ss 155 / /1)j)I,r/, II�� �3 C�\� • °O • / • 1 I \ \— \ 4 / \ y\\ \ \ \ \ / \ I *� \
/ i L r r - s / / h° �155 �� / // -� / 75 • \ \\ \ \\\ \ \ �\ \ \ \ /
n �+�' I i _•'_•'_____:-w_ ._ \ r• Pam_ :6 ., \ � �, . _ �65 %�/� 1 . / \\\ �\ \\\ \ � - \ �,
\I-o /( ,�/ .
>\
i\
/tea
-�-
— \.
\ I --
,\
I
i �
� ��1 r -
�:�
c
�1 t �
Ir/ . � r
>..r
1 "
/i I`r � �Y: t
I 1 11�e:is�.•,•:•: ' \\\\III,/
•
\ 1 \\, =� �
\ \ \,\0\\\-
•
•
I
•
- - - -
c • . s-
A �i r
1 1 ♦ /
r
V S ♦ �. \� -
.� I " \ t
1 r
i. f D. <\'� It
:�i► '
/ s Z
�F' A l
�.
u _ \
i
�_ r 1, II RBI '\":: „ � I .';►• � � �
sy ♦ c w
� - ,�. - vas►- � � �' �\\ , i, . �[ J �{P >,�,
/�) \ \ 11 / �) )1 \\\ \\ \�\�� �/
\_\
^ \ \ L \ 1 / \ 1
\\ _ \
8 \\ EX. CEMETERY � - � \ - \
s \
I Ex. / \� �\ \ J� �o � \ \ 111 \ \
•WETLANDS: / - . � i ~ \ ) '�;�� b� /) l l I / J i
(TYP.) \ \ / )
3 S /
. / N 2p5 • . - el 1 �( ( \ I (
0
r=
>
1
.
3
3
3
rn
LL
A 1I
1-4 W
W E
1- 4
-
z p
W�
W�
O
0U
H
z
D
O
u
w
z
Z
=
O
u
z
Jii�\/� \�\� \����� \\ � � J \� 11 �� � 1 III I :: �� -,. 155� f j / • / I I ( ( \ \ \ — \ z
1 \ \� J, *-
�� \\� \ \ \ \ • _ ' : { 145 / =� - / I o , 2p0' 10 J / l J l
/�� / �1 1, \) / �\ \ ` �\ \ \ �\ \\ \) \L \\\ / I �// : • \ 145 i \\\ 135' / �150� 16 / 0 N ( ��� //),/ J) \\� - 0
\\\\\��\-/�\\\`-�\\� \\�\\� \r�\\\.`�\ \\"\ \ 111 • r I III I\rho /� '�\ /! // \�� ,_ /� ASS 115 • ti0y 1g5 -\ f�\\\\\\�/ //j�_�\\ z
\\ ^\ - �\ �� \ \ \ \ \ \ ` � I I \ • o , • O / �' is �, • l�'9 \� /// / / —
\\\� ��� \�\ \ - \ \ ��\ �) III ( s / /� I\l \ h / s o o 00 o \ �/ / _� \
\ �� \ - � �\r \ \ \\ \ y\� \''s0 )III / �; l 140 / (r,, , = / ,� ti \ �\ - �// / \ V -_
\\ 1 \ \ \ l \\ /- \\�� ~ \\ / `l I �/ ` p • • • \\ _ / \ )1 \ �� coo i4 �j� / // �./'` % \ — /�/ / \ �� \ J
\\\ \ ) ` \ \ �_ \ /� �_\\ \\� \11,11II I // / ` \ IIIII((/i • • • \ t� \ 11 �� ho 165 ` �qh • . OJ NUJ \ `�_ / � \ L _ _ -
\\\>;�\ - `� �� ��\� r ��� \ /� o I Il // / /) 11 l \ ;:.: �\\\ ram, / goo • • �e�; b I �_ _ // �\ v
\\-�J \ \ -� \\ L-/ o J\\� \ �. \\ J EX.TOPIIII / i �� I/ Ir ' / , \\\ `' j \ 1�0 • o Li�I/ \\`ps\\� I r\�//^�
1 \ I / \ ` V�\�) \ 1 G EX. HARNETT COUNTY 1 \ \ VI \\\ \ \\ \;il �5 N \ G �\ \ f � /� ti ) I 1 J//
V,/-- J \ \ �' > � ��\ ) II((t, ) �� r\\ OF BANK 11 •/ i f I . • s \� J� \ \ • !r\\ \\\\Ji) r 1\ __ // \ ) / 1/ j
�L\�T/) ) \ \ ��L_ ( r/o\, \\ r \\\ \ (�^\ REGIONAL PUMP STATION `�_ o'r'� \1\ I ��'s (F`, �' // \ ( ,
1\�%- ( a / )// i - - -� / ;%=--/ V ��^ �\ a \ ��, 1 �` �° II 11 ( // - / 1 / \\\\\ / -�11 /� —/ 1 l l / / / i =
\ / / // — � r —� =!/� �/ //( \\�\\\\ �I �i �I 135 • . • • I ( r > \ 5 1 J \ i — /
\ - _ \� � - \ 1 . / // / ::, I�(/ \ ✓ J(� (� /�, \\l \\ \ I 1 I s II(III ((( \ � I I '/ i/ I1 \ � / �1 / / //� vi
\� ( / \ -�11� 1\�\ �\ / I (.\�\\II� II %/ 9 `� \ \ �ti/i/�I��_ �f/1/1�1� /
(< (( s I \
l /i \ w
o
\ )\l` I (I/ JI /�- \� \� Je�- 1\ �\ ��� \�. �;`� ((��� - J / j o� \ ss - IIV �\ '$ 185 00 /' 11 J \\\ire \� ////�j//�
\ 1 \ ,�2 �s I /�- _ — �/ / / ^� _ . • - oo V� d �\ \ - J // 1I l l��// \\ 1e5 / , . ( / I \\ \ //�\\ // / /� /�i//
) \\J 1 \ 3 \�
�, 1 \�_��_ _ „ _ _ - / = � - _\ \\�s� ® --) \T lI - �' \\ ' �� �/ (11� `i \< ///' )'M J //f/ (I I ( 11I �j\(\II
/ \ ll // //��/ / 1 - -\\ )i \\\ 140� ii� J / - \ (( - - \�_ \ / l \ 1
/ / -- \� 1( \` A\\\ 1'\\l J - I\ EX. TOP :�\ / � I/ � �, 1 I I \ l
�� 1 /// / \ -�\\ \� \f ,(// ��� c\� \��\ ��r-\ ice- 135 . J�\ )\\ I ( �. �� 3 \ \ / / 11 I \ \ �-
� 1\ l l 11 / `� \\\ o i \\ I �/ 1( ��� �t _= -� — \ - \ I �� _ , -,o ( / 1 IIId�\\\\\ / / ( i I(III) I I ` \ �1\�
// I \ ) - �� J ) \ \\/\� \�- \� - —_ ))i %�130�/ v �� /�ii1\� ( �` OF BANK l� :_::. ::.::. �`� 6p� / J/ I III(r��f )1I ( \\\`\-
1 /-- �)��/� \ /////i�/ \\\ 1\ \\ / / ( (( ` ��\\ \ \- _ _ \ _ - _ / _ �1I /(_ d - a` _ pI(\_ / -
1 / \ /ice ) r \ \ ) \ ) t ��\ "�� '7�� — \\` — �_` _'%,�/ � � — - `1..� — / / �� EX. TOP \)(` _ J �- •' .: " :•.ti= •:•: \�� `!�� h\\ J I \ �' �' I / / l I 1 \ \ `_
\� �/ % /// \ � � /^\\ //-` i \\ G \ I( C` \ 1 �J\� FEMA100YR 1�.'•`�s�'�---Z— m �% ` =125�- -: � -�i�- \ OFBANK � ��1) \�/ 1�� % �\ ���/ I 1\\\_\r �l II\ \ \/\1(\\\ \
J) 7 / �\ ` \ \\ I i \ \ \ \ 1 \�\ 1( \ - \�\ FLOODPLAIN : �1' - \_ �� _ - r / -r - - ( s �l \\ / \\� \ _ - --
J / �- I // / \~ \ I \ \ \ �I �~ \ ) J am\ ':: .. - - 0 _ ���\ t / t L \ /� \ 0 \\\\� ��� f- � \ \\ \ ,-
r (� �% / J C\` / �l \ \I �C— J 1 \\\ \ \\ I1` 1 \. \ �• ••'--:-:-: . — - �2 _ '\� 1 / / / \ 1 -�� - ��`'' / \ \- \\ \\\\\\ �/; J//��-
1� —F �( // ( / \ \\\ / �\ 1 ^ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\J L ? �� \ ��\ FEMA FLOODWAY _ '"•:fi -:- :•:::-: : .- : 7:: •:•: :':_-.:: - / :: .\ - l L I \ \ \\ \ ��/ ��_ .. .. \� ' % \� 1 � \ , -\ \ - �� / i�
�( ) / \� �� \\\ \) ,- \ \` \�\ �� \ ::: :_: EX. WETLANDS :......�'.. �- - -- / / +� �' t, ` -170 \\ I 1 / - _ \ \\_\ / /
( '/ �, II i' `; \` - ��\\—� Il/-- ~ \ \ �\ \ _ EX. WETLANDS ��J _ \\\\_\ PRELIMINARY
( //�(\\ \\� \ %/'/ \\ \\\\ 1 \ �� I \ - ` `\ \n �� i:� (TYP.) -: � ::%:• .,.- - . `�� 1 �� EX. STREAM Ch �� J inn .1 w.,�, / - \�
O ( ,�/ /I / \ \ \ \ /� \\ \\ l \ �'' ' l� - �\ ti ( ) /1 %�� _� �1\� �((/(` � NOT APPROVED FOR
\ 5� / f (�1\\ \\ \\ (/// \\ \\\ �\ / I` ) ��- I \�S \ ..... .'*. � TYP. c�5. I/ / \\ \,1��� I ` \
\ \\ l \ \ \ -t (/` \ \ / \1�I - - :: • i �� �" - �� r 15 �JIJJ� \ \\\\ > /(//( 1 \\ \ ' CONSTRUCTION
1 / /� ) 1 /L \ /�\ \\ \ \ \\\ \ / / ( CAPE FEAR RIVER \ T �� 1 `\\
-_ vL \\ _. \ J - FEMA FLOODWAY �� \ ti \ \�\\\g\ \ \ I
I \\ - 11 \\\\\ \ L
J/ �\ l - ) / 1 \\\ \ 1l \ l/ \\ - �> J < / I 1 I ( / \\\ \�� - - ��, \ '�`� \� \\ -, \- r fi y �� , (� �� �� /. _ IIIIR \ �j�\ \ \ \
. \\ -0 / ) r / \\ , I 1 /; _ _ /� �- - �� ' - \ - - \ \ \ FEMA FLOODWAY ��\ - �- - / u -/ \\ /� _ 1 111 I r \
_ J \ \ � r \� \\� < FOX ISLAND \ /
�, // - J �i � \\ \� 1 l ( (� . / \\ � _/ice \ 1 C\ / \ �� �� / / /o r — l
->�\\ lam\ ��% �// �� _\\\� \ �� j \� / ///
_ �\ \\\ ( i �L / "- c�j �� 1 /� \\\\ I (l`t I / / 0 200 400
- - 1` \I ( - I , — \ / � \\\ / I I J \\ \ I 1 C j L r �\ o \ \ N FEMA 100 YR - ���1 ��\ \ \ 1 I / ///�
\� �� /� III \ � / / � I _
/ SITE BOUNDARY \ \ I / SCALE: finch = 400 ft.
\ \ \ / /� 1111\ \) J \ J \ ` \ _� \ \\ FLOODPLAIN �`I`\ �\� \� J� I / I//�/
\ ( I /� __ I) i \ \ //� I \\` \ - I �% \ \ \ �� /-- CAPE FEAR RIVER \\\\ � \\ - J �IU 5
\ \���vvv_ A /r v Ait , A -- / v �'�„�
�- - \ _� /��\�_-�_ / 100' RIPARIAN \ \ \\
/ �% ///�%/l/ \\\ -��� // i \ �r _ �� \�� /~ \ \ �� , - �i�\�-,\, ( _ J - - l - - - )\ l \ BUFFER — _-�`-_ _ _ _—//-) \ ~\\ - \\\
i / /// y_ //((( I �/ �� //%� \\\/r�� �J /�— � t i _ \ �\\ \ � � — / // � \ /% ---- �— � — j � � � —� — — �` J ` \ _ f \\\ �_ ��
lll)/! / / / )� 1 1 I I l //�//� ���\���(�\ \i(( �i \� / / / -i ` R \ _ v�r \ _ \ \ - \ 1 \ ` _ \ - �- / \\ \
/ ✓ /� ) 11 //� / \ �- / /1 /� — �\ -� ��= - \ / �i� f�\\� \ -�/ - \ \�� \\, I-
I l//�s �(l/I I�jl'� l /�i/�/ ) �/ / \�\ �1\ f , l �\ / _� � ~ �\ f- - _ � _ �1 �� �l \ \ - -� / J / / \mil �\ \
//J �� (\ (I // //i/�� / 1�/`\ \\\�]I111111( \// �r�\� \ / % I -�� // \ r \ c� �-� — ir-=''\\\�� \\ \ `�ll�l��\ �� _ \ �� ��-\� ���\� 1 \\11��
��C \t ) /�� /fi/� I \ I\��jl/� �\ IIJI// ��\\11�/ \\ \ \ _ /\^ c -� �/- - —" ���\� �J=�O11L�ir \ / -, �- \ - / \/ \\
»\\\\\ \ �� /i//j� L^ Ohl p11(( �\\\\\v )) \\ �i 1\�/I II \\ / I I \��\\ �- \ / ~ \ _ - �/� _ — — _ �% �i \� - ��\\ ��) I��� \� �/� \"� �� � ` \
//� / -\\ \\ll) �\ / / \� I 1 l \\ 1� 1\ I11 �l / \ JI I� III \\ 11 \ ��- J - — — �i/\ ��\��% I�//� /�.-\ l) 1 \ - /
/ ill e *��\ �\ ) r =/ /i \� �1 - / 1 = \-
\\ �\� \ I II \\� -\ J? \ / / \ Jl'l 1 I ✓ \ I r � )1 111\\�_ ( // � - ��\ / \ // / r \` _- \ _\�� J ///r _ \\ \ \\� %� )1) 11�/������-� -- �
��� / ��1�' I!� ��\�\I \ \ )1I�\ / a \ it 111 ll r (I I I --- \ \� �- \ �\ ��;�/ l �_\�\
��I1 \-- - IlI l I� 1\\\ \\\\ / - i I1���j/� t�\ _ ! ��' / ! I \\\ I�fll��//� \ \\\���� \\\ ��- �,� / 1 \ / - -�\\' ;� �i ���J�� - - \\ \ �� /�j/ �r//�/�\�--�� \ \\� ��� \ -��/ /
/i\��� \ / // �/ \\� 1-�/ )(ell /Zi- �=J \\ \ 1 ��_// \\ ����� %��� \� ) I(( - _ /�� // \ // - -� �\ / �l� \\\��\ \\\- -�1� \� /
��ii �� \\\\\\ ' /'�// Ill >� \ �\ I`\\ // _\ ')I( l� IIl -\\ \\\ \\\\\� \\ \\- I l� �� 1 I --J J� �\ \ �� -- J-1 l�� / /-` \ /l \\� \\ \\ / \--_ \\
/ \� \\ ////// ///�1 I(II /� ///JIJ ' \) ! 1 ��� \__�/ JII \ \ _ \ l / �� ��-r \ \ \ \-� \\ ti \\(( ( \\��� \ 1 __ 1
I / \(1 \\\ /j II ////� ll/-s�- \\/ll \���-� t= __��\\\\ I / /� \\ \\\\\\\\\� 1 \ \�11�\\ \\\ �/� ' -- / /l \��-- �J©g / ��\ - \ \\� \\� \\\\i I� \��-�� \\ //�� -� V -_ J \� /
I / \ \\\ / / // III III( //i//i�// // �_- - _ � - ///� \ \ 11� \ �c = � - � � � l S l \ \ \ 1 \ _ \ \ ��) \\� \- � - _ \\\\
/ \ \� I� ��//// II U /� / /- \- \ (� 1 = — �////1� (1 \ \\\\��� 1 \\\ \ �))�11� \��� - -� - ��„� /��/���� J\\ (/S \ �\ / ) \ �� \- \�� \� -� J J / �J \\�
/��y\ J t / // l � //� � I � � s� �\� �. /l/\ 1 \ \ 1 � \\ / ////�/ ��/�\\��\\� � ��\�__ ,� �--��\\\fir �j / � \ l> 11\\1 / / 1 \ \� /- � �%/��// ////�_" //� � � (� � o) \�
/l/l I \ J / `l I I III // 11 I 1/lllll l l l (l/// / // \\ l / l I \ / `III 1 f I) 1) %\ \ / /�/���/i� �� ��-�\�� ( \�� �> l�J \\\\\\ \ /i�/ /i �/ ,\ \ \\ {� 1 l) l 1 1 1 \ \ �\ \ - 1 / - _ / /�// l / = =� �\ \ J �' �`11 /f \
///// (� ��\�^ J1 / )II��III / / //�\\ �/ 11 r - I 11�� (/ I I 1) \l (/ / ( 11 / //(�/�� / \�((I\(\ \ - �\ /i/// / 1 I I I 1 \ \ \1� //� —_ ����Ji1 ( / ��, - - ���J _\`\�/i/�\\\�
,\ 11111E /)11 / ((�-�11111//j// // \\\ �\\ I� \ fl I (�i 1 1 J 1 1 I / /L/�� /=\\� JI1 \\\ > �>� \\lJ)j�/� �\ \1\��\11 IIJJ I (( ��//�\\\ I 1 I / j /\--- -/ / \ 1 /J //ice -- � (/(/ / /�/-_ _- l/ \
III((I(G�' I I/// r \� � ,���� ((I((�� �JI (I f - \ \ l - _ _ ) I „ , ( /
I� II \ I I / / / 11 I )I Il Its/ - 1 \\\� 1 J\ \\ (�� =�)�l 1/ ��)) I f - % ✓ -�- - \\ \ \\
\\\ I ( 1� ji \\\\��`r)IYIIIII(/ //�t��\\\ \1( t�� \ l I ( �I I� I 1 (I 1 1 ! J/ / \i//i/ _ -_ \ �J11 I//// 1 \1 ( / ��� f - � - �� - \
II I ) � � I � ` / 1 � � � I III % / /i///ii�� - ` 1 I 1 \C / � I� l�/ - -' �_ \�/ \
I / II J I \ l l / l ' / /� //_ /i -�\\\ \� /i ((� = 11 //� \\\ l (/« ! / //� /--- 1 \ I \ -/ �� / // / � //ii/�/ ll\ -\��\ \ \ \� � \ � \\\\
11 1 -�� \ / \ - )\ I \ / 1 \ // 1 / 1 I I / l � r // / / /i � ��- - \ \ ) // / J//l II \ \ / \ I / / -� \ ��\\\\
\ \�/� //-\\��\ I / ( `II I \_� 1 l �/ /// -/ // \- / /� / l/l 1 //l\-\\\\�`\\ 111 /ll j i� \ 1 \\Y- �� /i / /���/i �� 1 \� J \�\\\\ \ \ --\\ \-`- \\\\\�
\\\�\�\\ \�\ �/ /��_-\�\\�/llllllll/ \ 1�\ \_� //III �- �iiJl(�/ 1(I l! /%//l/ ll /////� (�-� /��_ \ \ \\\\ ///�%�i/�('11 (r I'X`\�� 1fl %/ // \ \ ) I /i/ ��/i//ii�, i/�__\\���\\\\/�� J/ �� ���\\\\\ \ -� \ \� \\
_ \ / \`/� �\ \\ y� I I / l� \ \\\\ ` (LJ/ I r \� % „ / 1 I ! / / // // 1( �/ ii i ' \\ \ I I ( /� /�/��\�«\(l I 1 - _ \ \\ 1 I / l l � - - � - / / ' / � x /���/� //,— �� \ /ii/(� \\ (1 / // \\ - \D�\\\\ \ \ \ \ ) \\,
J)\\\\y\ ` /�\��/ / \�J1llII� \ / \--� ---`_/1/ �� / /J/ / // / //// \✓ //// �\ \ \\ \\\\\\��\���\� \\���= / \\\\\1\ \\� //1 // r- �--- / �J / // �j������/i\ �/l�JJ] \\\\�`//l/\\( \
__ -�\ r \ ���JIj ( \\�--\-_— � �// / / / I/ / / / \\ \ �i/////� \ ` \ \ \ \\ \\ > J)1>1�����>»\)II( ) \�\�\\\\l\\ /i/ / �\ -� / i� �/ i/// /�/{C�/Illlllll\ ///� ��\ \\\\\1111�\��\\\\ \\\\\\ \\�/ \ �\ /L\
\\ / \ / / �`J ( \ -- _ / \/ / / / / \ /// / \ \ \ \ \� \ 1 / / >) l 1�\ ( \ //// /� ) \\ \moo\\\\\ \ \ I �\ ) \ 1
r =� / / � / / J� \ ,\ -- �� _� / / (� / l I (l ( _ \\ �/ // / // \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \�� 11 l <� �_ \ / l //////1)/l 1 �111�\lll► / /� / / / / \�\�I %; (` (� l /��<�� = ��� //////11�I��U��( '- �� ��� ���i\\ \\�\\�\� \\\"\\ \�\ \ J 1j l
/ \\ J I \- - \\ / / ---�) 1 I ( / / ) (\\ \ / /- �� \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ll�(\\ ) /�/ 11 I I�lllll I/ ( // / \ ` / IIIiI -� �� \ �- \\ \ \ - \
J \ \ / I \
/� /// \ /� / -�)1 �/ e \\\\� %/ / \ I / \ \� �\ // \\\\ \ \\\ \ \ \\ 11 ///�llll ( / ))/II�Ip111I1(\ (( \\ 1 \ \\ \ \� << �/� — 1 l\\�)) ,�� \\\?1\\\\ \l \\\ \� \ \\\ \\\ \�
l / l\ f / \ /-\\\ / (� J(\ 1 )(/( \ \ \//� / \- \\ \\ \\\� \ \ I I �j / /J 1 4( �\ 1�/ I / \ i \ \ \ / -�/�, \ IIII \ »`\\ \\\\\ \ \ 1
/ I / �\ \\ ��_—_�_ r II ( (`/\- /� \( ` -- // ' _\\\\\ \ 11 )111\�\ \\ ( (/((1�l�lY e / //(((II\\\\\\ \\ / \\ \ �\\\I\� - _ �/ \ /� )\\ \\\\ �l� \ \\
-- / / �> / \ / / '\\\�\ \ \\ \\ \\� (�_ - \\ l / \\\ I l\\ \\ , / /( �IIII\\1l\ / �i - \ /'\`�/ 1 II \\ / \\\�\\\\\ \ \ I
/l / f / I ( \ \-mil1��=-� \ --- / \\\ \� \\ ---\\\ / \\\\ \ II // J I1 \ \���\\\\ / I ) ��JJ >\ \ (I I \ / \ - \\\1��� --- _ 1 (/f\� �� �\\\
/ / / l ( l \ \ I ( / \ I I \ / / 1 \ 1\ �\ \ - \ , / / - \ 1 r \ \ \ 1 (/ 11 // // \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \�\ / / ( ) I I 1 l /�Ji/J)\\ I \ \ - // /���\�\1l l l l ) \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ ) I
\ \ ( I \ \ \ / \ 1 / / \ \ I %� / \ 1 \ \ \ 1 I I //� \ \) %/I (\���/ / \ \\ llJ 111 / \\\ )\\\ \ - \ \
/ ( \ S \\ �- 1 J t 11\ / \ '\\-\ \ \ \ ////// \I 1 \ \\) 1 S l J/�J I) ! J \ �/� i\\\ \ I \ WRJobNo. DATE
/ ,- / , )1 r\ , � \ ) I \\\ r , - �/ I \ J l \- / ( 1 \ \ 1 \\\ I / / 1 I ( / - \ \ III //I`\� \ 1 1\ \ \ \ \\\ 1 /)>//I II 1 I // II�� /(//// f //// / \\ � / 1 IIIIIL /� -- \ f/// \ /) ) �/ I� / 1 \ \\\ / w/\\�\ \ \ \\�l \
\ \ � 1 I I / J / \ \\ ) / / I \ �\ \\ \\ \ \ ( 7� L i I ( \ \ 1\ 1 1 I I //// \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\t //% (v > / IIII1 I / / // / / \ -- - - \ / f // ` l I I J \ y / ' \ \ < I l J r' \ \ _ 022013�2 02/15/2023
r \ \ \ ( �\ 1 I)) \l / / III / / \ \ / %ll \ / / \ )) \ �/, /i �: , / \ / / I I(/ >\ \\
\�\ / �I r, / / / �� �_/ / I \ /^ / I\ \\) \ `\ / I(�/- J ( /� J ( III (////( ( ���\\�\II / //I((1\((�\�-\ 1�\l\ �HII,III/// / I ( \ c / !✓/�/` \ 1 I(l _ //'/ �\ \ 1 N� ��/ �/ I I(�\\\\\ \��`��/ �� DRN:WR DGN:WR CKD:WR
\ 1 I JII/T�L I I / I/-__/ ( J / l 1 \ 1 \ \ \ I I 1 II J I iIi(11 (\,\1(III�/!/( �// ! (1l�\� 11��IIII\� `� I \ \ I \\f�\ \ / / // ��/ 1 I Ii\ j''�i� )\ \�((l /�-� \� l (I� / ��\ / // -\\
\ \ \� I / — _ ' \ / � �/ / / / 1 1\ \\, \ - I / I \ / 1 1I1\ \\ \J ) II) /// ////`( ) _1 ((/1111III1\\ \ \ \ \ - / / / \ `/' ' \\ , � �))�/� \
�i \ / \ ( \ l I I c� l I \ \ \ - \ i ` / 1 I \ \� , _ / %� I / / \ �\ \ 11 / ��\ OV E RAL L
-� JI ) I! (I \ \ r l l / l l i / 1 1 \1 -: ) / \, l ((I \\\\t \\\ \ \ \ \ ` �� \ I \\\ _ ��� ) \( // -`�
�I \\\ I I \1I I \\\\ �Jl�/l l l c�\1 I))IIII\\\\\ \ \ \ 1 — ( //ice-\— \\\ \ =\l
j, // �\ J / II1 \ / -� I� / ( \ \ 1 I I (/ �/ / // //J/ )1 ))/( (\I�//i 1 \\� 1 \\ \\�\ \\\ \\\\ \ \ \ - \ \ // \ \ __- _�-/ /( \J- /// (/ \ \ \ I I r I�`-�\� ��`\ � \ \\\ PRELIMINARY
�I / / \ // / \ 1 / / \ ( / l ) 1 > I / 1 I /� /i / /i/// I �/ { \ \�, ll/ JI 1 1 \\\\ \ 1\\l \ \ \ \ \ / t - \ \ \ �% / / \ \ �\ = -- - I \ \� 1 \\ \ \ \\ \���1` ll< < < / \\ ` \ \\ \\
\ I / I 1 I / / /1 I (�\ �, ( l 111\ �J)\ll\\\ \\\`I II \ \ \ \ \ ` / / \ — _ \\- \ \/( �1/ �\ \ / \\ \ -�\� ;JCS \�
( ) I / \ \� - \-_ / I (— / l / / / / / 5 III - \\ ((l� I) I 1 Il \\\\ III \ \\ \ \ 1 / / \ \ \ \ �\ --- - \\ I 1 \ I)L!1��� \ �Z _ \\
`\\, / _ / \ I \, / /// \ - \ )) 11 \\ \ I \ \ !! /� - - \\ \�\ / \ \ _ �� 11 1 1 / (�L, \�� _ \ GRADING PLAN
l' N,i \�l` ! ) _J / \ \ \ \` -,i I I I— l / / // ( \� I�\�-�\� 11\\\I//iL r� )�I`\\\\\\\\II \ \\ \\\ / \ \\ \ \XJ \ \-_--_ ��\\� = \\\ \1 II( \ \ 1 1 I I ���\\�\ �\ \\
/ I� �/ J1/ -L /\ J 1 \ \ � - � l l / / I �- -L \ / \ // l( /rJ \ \_� IIL \�,A)))A\ I / //� %/I \\� \�\11'\ I \ / / t - _-= '�\\\ �\ \\ �(I I 1 \\ 1 -�/I1 I III l l \ �\
/ / I I /// �/ I I 1 1\ \ - ) / �/ / / / t / I ( - \ _ \\ \ 1 \\III((\ / J I \\\\\\\\\ \\ \ \ I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ ` \\\ J _\\ \\\ \\ 11 \ I J I I (I l 1�� \\\ \ \ \
//I I // ( ) 1 \ \ / (,\-.\ \ ��// \- Ill \ \�\ -_� � �� \ II I( \\1� �/� I\ \\ \ \ \-� I �\ 1 / /, \ \ \ ) II Il /) 5 �\ \ \ \ 1
l/ J/J)�) / I \ \ / �\ ) �� / (' ( \ \ \ - / I �1 % 1 \\\ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ `�� /i - \ \ \��' \ \\\\\ \ \\ J I ) I l J / // 1 r _� \\� \\
�-/� / I ( ) V \ 1\ \ / \ /\i/ / // / lI \ '\ \\ -=�-� \ \ C\�(�(/\(_���1�\�\\\�, 11 (� 11 \\\l \\� \ \ \\\\\\ \�/ \ \ \ \ `/ �- / //\ 1 / /� � \�\\\\\ \ \\\/i/!/1/l (=;i i // / ��\�\�\\ \\
��/�/� / ( / / \ t — / / / — J\\� = �� \\1\\ 1 \—�)II\��\\ �c�) I I 11111 \\\\\\\\\ \ \ Y ./ / 1 I ��jl\\ \ \ \\ \_//% L // �� \—J1�i111\\\�\\\\\,l�\\
�/- �i/ \ \ / ) I \ \ I I� �\ i/, / / i �� _ �\--_/� ���\ \ \� lll,il - 1�\�����1 r.l I lrll, 111\\ \ \. \� ,\ \\ \ \ \ / i / ) r , , / /,.\ \\\\�\\\�\\\\ \ �\ Jt r Jar
u
u
L-
•
A
O
CL
L-
O
( . D E

INDEX OF SHEETS
NUMBER
TITLE
1
OVERALL STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS
2
IMPACT MAP SHEET INDEX
3
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS SUMMARY TABLE
4
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS SUMMARY TABLE
5
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS SUMMARY TABLE
6
RIP -RAP BASIN ENERGY DISSIPATER DETAIL
7
CULVERT INSTALLATION DETAILS
8
CULVERT INSTALLATION DETAILS
Al
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
A2
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
B1
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
B2
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
C
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
D
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
E
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
F1
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
F2
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
G
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
H
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
I
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
J1
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
J2
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
K
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
L
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
M1
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
M2
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
N
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
O
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
P1
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
P2
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
Q
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS
N
X
W
0
Z
H
W
W
2
Q
H
U
Q
►]
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN:WR
DGN:WR CKD:WR
2

Q
g
Z
Q 0
a�
O
Z
O
Q a
aLL
w
WETLAND & STREAM
PERMANENT
PERMANENT (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
PERMANENT CONVERSION
TEMPORARY
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
W1
ROADWAYGRADING
9,667
0.222
-
-
A
W2
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
514
0.012
51
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
4
9
0.001
-
-
S2
ROADWAYGRADING
135
355
0.009
-
-
-
-
-
-
S3
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
-
-
-
12
25
0.001
-
-
-
S4
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
7
14
0.001
-
-
B
W3
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
357
0.009
W4
ROADWAYGRADING
7,042
0.162
-
-
W5
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
195
0.005
-
-
W6
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
257
0.006
C
W7
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
5,774
0.133
-
-
W8
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
5,830
0.134
W9
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
1,662
0.039
-
-
W10
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
1,230
0.029
D
W11
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
480
0.011
S5
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
21
259
0.006
-
-
-
-
-
S6
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
23
279
0.007
-
-
W12
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
5,548
0.128
W13
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
6,085
0.140
-
-
E
W14
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
1,630
0.038
S7
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
21
347
0.008
-
-
-
-
-
S8
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
23
362
0.009
-
-
W15
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
1,789
0.041
W16
ROADWAYGRADING
24,918
0.572
-
-
W17
ROADWAYGRADING
10,240
0.235
-
-
W18
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
393
0.009
W19
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
434
0.010
W20
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
1,230
0.029
-
-
-
-
W21
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
-
-
3,563
0.082
-
-
F
W22
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
817
0.019
W23
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
3,519
0.081
S9
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
11
165
0.004
-
-
S10
ROADWAYGRADING
142
3,694
0.085
-
-
-
S11
STREAM REALIGNMENT
58
962
0.022
-
-
-
S12
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
4
82
0.002
S13
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING
21
264
0.006
-
-
-
S14
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
21
237
0.006
G�
Z
0
LIJ
a
Q
U
�o
i
W
J
0
m
Z
J
~
W
GC
3
C
0
G
Z=
CQ
G
w
U
w
Q
F
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN: WR
DGN: WR CKD: WR
3

Z
W ETLAN D & STREAM
Z
O
Q 0
Q a
PERMANENT
PERMANENT (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
PERMANENT CONVERSION
TEMPORARY
Q
g
a�
aLL
O
w
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
G
W24
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
5,897
0.136
GRADING
H
W25
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
65,986
1.515
GRADING
W26
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
-
-
-
7,652
0.176
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADING
W27
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
131
0.003
I
W28
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
6,604
0.152
-
-
GRADING
W29
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
702
0.017
W30
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
191
0.005
W31
ROADWAYGRADING
2,023
0.047
-
-
W32
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
31
0.001
S15
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
7
17
0.001
-
-
i
S16
ROADWAYGRADING
251
813
0.019
-
-
-
-
-
-
S17
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
-
-
-
11
34
0.001
-
-
-
S18
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
26
0.001
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
S19
130
334
0.008
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADING
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
S20
_
-
-
27
181
0.005
-
-
-
CROSSING
S21
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
22
122
0.003
K
W33
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
1,009
0.024
-
-
-
-
-
CROSSING
W34
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
1,109
0.026
W35
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
107
0.003
L
W36
ROADWAYGRADING
610
0.014
-
-
-
-
-
S22
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
4
6
0.001
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
S23
121
482
0.011
-
-
-
-
-
-
M
GRADING
S24
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
-
-
-
3
6
0.001
-
-
-
S25
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
4
6
0.001
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
W37
4
0.001
-
-
-
-
-
CROSSING
W38
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
9
0.001
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
W39
652
0.015
-
-
CROSSING
W40
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
609
0.014
S26
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
28
180
0.005
-
-
N
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
527
26
143
0.004
CROSSING
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
S28
25
31
0.001
-
-
-
CROSSING
S29
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
25
52
0.002
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
S30
22
87
0.002
-
-
-
CROSSING
S31
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
21
101
0.003
G�
Z
0
LIJ
a
Q
U
�o
i
W
J
0
zm
J
~
W
GC
3
C
0
G
Z=
CQ
G
w
U
w
Q
F
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN: WR
DGN: WR CKD: WR
4

Z
W ETLAN D & STREAM
Z
O
Q 0
Q a
PERMANENT
PERMANENT (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
PERMANENT CONVERSION
TEMPORARY
Q
O
w
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
a
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
`)
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
S32
22
145
0.004
-
-
-
O
CROSSING
S33
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
21
91
0.002
S34
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
4
19
0.001
S35
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
-
-
-
9
47
0.001
-
-
-
S36
ROADWAYGRADING
191
1,013
0.024
-
-
-
-
-
-
S37
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
4
10
0.001
-
-
P
W41
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
216
0.005
W42
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
40
0.001
-
-
W43
ROADWAY GRADING & LOT
4,134
0.095
-
-
GRADING
W44
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
155
0.004
W45
GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER
2,402
0.056
Q
CROSSING
W46
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
-
-
1,258
0.029
TOTAL IMPACTS
1 1,028
7,653
0.178
146,238
3.361
220
1,569
0.040
21,151
0.490
240
1,778
0.051
27,316
0.635
Gi
0
LIJ
a
Q
U
�o
i
W
J
0
m
Z
J
~
W
GC
3
C
0
G
Z=
CQ
G
w
U
w
Q
H
a
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR

SLO
E;
SEE P
L_
..A.. -7 „B„ -7 „C„ „",
LB (LENGTH OF BASIN)
SEE TABLE FOR SIZE AND DEPTH C
PLAN
LB (LENGTH OF BASIN)
Ls (LENGTH OF POOL)
WATER SURFACE PROFILE
AT DESIGN FLOW
RIP RAP LINING
SEE TABLE FOR SIZE AND DEPTH
PROPOSED GRADE
\ Yo Tv (TAILWATER)
�1 hs (POOL DEPTH) Zi LEVEL 1
Wo
(PIPE DIAMETER)
WATER SURFACE PROFILE (NOMINAL) PROPOSED GRADE
AT DESIGN FLOW
0^ �1 1F2
LEVEL
RIP -RAP LINING J
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SEE TABLE FOR SIZE AND DEPTH
(NCDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATION
INCISE PIPE FOR AQUATIC PASSAGE
SECTION 1056-TYPE 2)
(SEE PLAN & TABLES FOR INVERT)
SECTION "A -A"
PROFILE
QSEE
m
WATER SURFACE PROFILE
AT DESIGN FLOW
o
INVERT AT END OF PIPE
(PIPE INCISED FOR AQUATIC
PIPE BEYOND
PROPOSED GRADE
PASSAGE)
—
2
2
1
hG (POOL DEPTH)
RIP -RAP LINING
SEE TABLE FOR SIZE AND DEPTH
WATER SURFACE PROFILE
EXISTING GRADE AT DESIGN FLOW
—
SECTION "B-B"
PIPE BEYOND
I APRON 1 1 2
(LEVEL) 1�
RIP -RAP LINING
SEE TABLE FOR
SIZE AND DEPTH
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
(NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION
SECTION 1056-TYPE 2) SECTION "C-C"
WATER SURFACE PROFILE WB (WIDTH OF BASIN)
AT DESIGN FLOW (AT END OF APRON)
YB —
LEVEL PIPE BEYOND
T o 71 EXISTING STREAM / \
CHANNEL BOTTOM
OF APRON)
END OF APRON TO CONFORM
TO EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL
(INCISE RIP -RAP TO MATCH
EXISTING CROSS-SECTION)
L GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
INCISE PIPE FOR AQUATIC PASSAGE L CHANNEL ELEVATION RIP RAP THICKNESS (NCDOT STANDARD
(SEE PLAN & TABLES FOR INVERT) (PIPE INCISED) T, = 2dso OR 1.5dM,x SPECIFICATION RIP -RAP LINING
Tz = 3dso OR 2 dM,x SECTION 1056-TYPE 2) SEE TABLE FOR SIZE AND DEPTH
(SEE DIMENSION TABLE) PROFILE RIP -RAP BASIN ENERGY DISSIPATOR
BASED ON HEC-14
NOT TO SCALE
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
(NCDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATION
SECTION 1056-TYPE 2)
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
(NCDOT STANDARD
END OF APRON TO CONFORM TO EXISTING SPECIFICATION
STREAM CHANNEL (INCISE RIP -RAP TO SECTION 1056-TYPE 2)
MATCH EXISTING CROSS-SECTION)
z
0
V
F-
z
a
x
V
z
z
0
z
N
a
J
W
Z W
W 0
Z
QLu
•
•i
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN: WR
DGN: WR CKD: WR
6

A L
STR
POLYETHYLENE FABRIC ON FACE
(8 MIL THICK)
TO PUMP
ale_
STREAM FLOW a
PLAN
EX STREAM BOTTOM
SECTION A -A
PROPOSED EARTH BERM (TYP)
FROM PUMP
PROPOSED EARTH BERM, TYP
TOPOFBANK
- POLYETHYLENE FABRIC ON FACE (8
MILTHICK)
TEMPORARY STONE CHECK DAM
TEMPORARY STREAM BYPASS PUMP AROUND
NOT TO SCALE
TEMPORARY STREAM BYPASS
NOTES
1. WORK SHOULD BE SCHEDULED SO THAT CONSTRUCTION CAN BE COMPLETED DURING A TIME OF MINIMAL PRECIPITATION.
2. PUMP AND LINE SIZES TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
3. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO CROSS DRAINAGE PIPE INSTALLATION.
4. WIDTH OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SHALL BE MINIMIZED BASED UPON FIELD CONDITIONS. ANY DISTURBANCE EXCEEDING WHAT IS SHOWN ON PLANS
MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL WATER QUALITY PERMITTING.
1. INSPECT WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT THAT PRODUCES %2 INCH OR MORE OF RAIN.
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT AND WOODY DEBRIS PROMPTLY.
3. REMOVE COLLECTED SEDIMENT FROM STONE/RIP-RAP AREAS AS NECESSARY. TOP DRESS WITH 2". WASHED STONE AS NECESSARY.
CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE
1. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ALL CROSS DRAINAGE PIPING DURING DRY WEATHER.
2. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE BETWEEN EXISTING STREAM AND AREA OF DISTURBANCE FOR ALL CULVERTS.
3. BYPASS PLANS ARE SCHEMATIC. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL
EQUIPMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE "DRY" WORKING CONDITIONS.
4. INSTALL UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM TEMPORARY STONE DAMS (CLASS " I' RIP -RAP) WITH WATERPROOF POLYETHYLENE FABRIC FACING (MINIMUM 8 MIL
THICK). DOWNSTREAM TEMPORARY STONE DAM IS INTENDED TO FUNCTION AS A TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING AND SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM TOP
WIDTH OF 10'.
5. INSTALL "CLEAN" WATER BYPASS PUMPS. SEE DETAILS THIS SHEET.
6. INSTALL WORK AREA DEWATERING PUMP AND SEDIMENT FILTER BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION AREA BETWEEN STONE DAMS USING
THE FILTER BAG.
7. CONSTRUCT CULVERT AND END TREATMENTS.
8. BEGIN BACKFILLING AROUND CROSS DRAINAGE PIPING.
9. REMOVE TEMPORARY SILT FENCE WHEN BACKFILL REACHES SILT FENCE.
10. CONCURRENTLY WITH STEP 10 REMOVE PUMPS, SEDIMENT BAGS, AND TEMPORARY STONE DAMS. (REMOVE POLYETHYLENE, REMOVE AND STOCKPILE
RIP -RAP, TO THE LEVEL OF THE STREAM BOTTOM, FOR USE IN CONSTRUCTING RIP -RAP DISSIPATOR.
11. MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT ENTERING THE CULVERT.
12. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SUPPLIES REQUIRED FOR ANY PUMPING OF WATER FLOW UNTIL CULVERT IS CONSTRUCTED.
z
O
W
a
Q
U
z
O
`
r
Q
J
J
J
F,^_
Q
Z
W
`z
r
\W
J
D
U
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN:WR
DGN:WR CKD:WR
7

12" OF NCDOT #5 OR
#57 WASHED STONE
STONE SHOULD BE PLACED OVER THE CHANNEL BANKS TO KEEP WATER
FROM CUTTING AROUND THE DAM.
SEWN -IN CONNECTION SLEEVE FOR
PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE
COVER #57 STONE PAD
WITH GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING (6 MIL MIN)
I 1.
#57'
FILTER CLOTH
TEMPORARY STONE CHECK DAM
NOT TO SCALE
MAINTENANCE NOTES:
1. INSPECT WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT PRODUCING
INCH OR MORE OF RAIN. ANY DAMAGE TO THE SEDIMENT FILTER BAG
SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY.
2. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER BAG SHALL BE REPLACED WHEN 6" OF
SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
3. MONITOR SEDIMENT FILTER BAG REGULARLY FORTHE PRESENCE OF
TURBID WATER BEING DISCHARGED. IFANYTURBID WATER IS BEING
DISCHARGED FROM THE BAG THE SITUATION SHALL BE RESOLVED
IMMEDIATELY. IF TEMPORARY BLOCKAGES ARE NOT FOUND, ASSUME
THE BAG IS AT SEDIMENT CAPACITY AND REPLACE IMMEDIATELY.
OPTIONAL LIFTING STRAPS
VARIES WITH GROUND LINE
SLOPE
SEDIMENT FILTER BAG
6" MIN
24" MIN
SILT FENC
USE #57 STONE TO LEVEL BAG FROM
NATURAL GROUND LINE
SEDIMENT
FILTER BAG
CROSS SECTION
NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION NOTTO BURST OR DAMAGE
THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER BAG WHEN PUMPING.
2. THE LENGTH AND WIDTH OF THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BAG SHOWN
ON THIS DRAWING MAY VARY PER VENDOR SPECIFICATIONS.
3. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER BAGS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A
SEWN -IN SLEEVE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ACCEPT A MINIMUM FOUR -INCH
DIAMETER PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE. THE DISCHARGE HOSE SHOULD BE
EXTENDED INTO THIS SLEEVE A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES AND BE
TIGHTLY SECURED WITH A HOSE CLAMP OR OTHER SUITABLE MEANS TO
PREVENT LEAKAGE. HOSE CONNECTION THROUGH A SLIT IN THE BAG
WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE.
4. THE PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE CONNECTION SLEEVE SHALL BE SECURELY
TIED OFF DURING DISPOSAL OF THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER BAG
IN ORDER TO PREVENT LEAKAGE OF COLLECTED SEDIMENTS.
5. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER BAG SHALL BE REPLACED WHEN 6 INCHES
OF SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL SIZE THE BAG DEPENDING ON USE AND FLOW
REQUIREMENTS.
SIDE VIEW
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
VARIES
10' MIN
SILT FENCE
EXISTING GROUND LINE
POLYETHYLENE SHEETING
1
24" MAX.
AT CENTER
z
0
W
a
Q
U
z
O
F_
Q
J
J
F J
Z ZF-
LU
\W
J
D
U
SEDIMENT FILTER BAG
NOT TO SCALE
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN: WR
DGN: WR CKD: WR
8

/
\ �o
/ I
d /
M „8 — —
M,8 / SS
55
/ '✓ / 160
CULVERT 7
� I
83.37 LF
24" RCP
SEE SHEET 6 FOR RIP -RAP BASIN
• ENERGY DISSIPATER DETAIL
IMPACT W1, /
of (PERMANENT WETLANDS)
ROADWAY GRADING \ /
/ / I 0.222 AC - (9,667 SF)
IMPACT W2
(TEMPORARY WETLAND) J
/ f / CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WETLAND WM
/ gbh 0.012 AC - (514 SF)
i 6S
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
- — -
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
N u
C a
"oo T
Isis
ro
0.
S3
,.
,
z
0
V
F
Z
O
w
Z
a
x
u
z
w
a
U
Z
°
Z
v
N
W RP E
5
0 15 30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
Al

CULVERT 7 - UPSTREAM
175
175
170
170
165
PROPOSED
GRADE
165
160
24" RCP
160
_IL
EXISTING
GRADE
155
155
9+50
10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 30' HORIZ.
1" = & VERT.
CULVERT 7 - DOWNSTREAM
175 175
9+50 10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 30' HORIZ.
1"=&VERT.
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN:WR
DGN:WR CKD:WR
A2

� TOP OF BANK
TOE OF BANK \ \
�V 'STREAM SAB
IPERENNIAL \ \ \
\ 1 1 \ \\NI/ !Nl 'd
ti
WETLAND WM \\
l
IMPACT S1
(TEMPORARY STREAM)
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
4LF-(9SF, 0.001AC)
IMPACT W3
(TEMPORARY WETLAND)
l CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
l� 0.009 AC - (357 SF)
l� RETAINING WALL W/
SAFETY FENCE
\ IMPACT W4 CULVERT 8 99.26 LF
(PERMANENT WETLANDS) /54" R P
ROADWAY GRADING
/ \ 0.162 AC - (7,042 SF) IMPACT S2
(PERMANENT STREAM)
ROADWAY GRADING
\Jv, / 135 LF - (355 SF, 0.009 AC)
S
ti
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
- — -
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
-�, // /I /// / /
/
Al
\j/ // J/
y�h
SEE SHEET 6 FOR RIP -RAP BASIN
ENERGY DISSIPATER DETAIL
IMPACT W5 / \4/ \11
(PERMANENT WETLANDS) / I
AP DISSIPATER 0.005I � \
0.005 AC - (195 SF) _
IMPACT W6
(TEMPORARY WETLAND)
— — — CONSTRUCTION ACCESS I
0.006 AC - (257 SF) I \1/ \4/ \1/ �1/
I M PACT S4 I \
(TEMPORARY STREAM) A/ \ \ Nil, �\
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
7LF-(26SF, 0.001AC)
ah IMPACT S3
(PERMANENT STREAM -
€ NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
�i 12 LF - (25 SF, 0.001 AC)
RETAINING WALL W/
SAFETY FENCE
STREAM SAB
PERENNIAL /
/ WE LAND WM \
y -
�DRY CREEK
PERENNIAL
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF BAD I TOP OF BANK
( TOE OF BANK
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
0
H
W
a
U
N
W RP E
\�P
5
0 15 30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
WRJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
B1

CULVERT 8 - UPSTREAM
Ir•S6
10111
155
155
150
PROPOSED
GRADE
150
RCP
54"
145
EXISTING i�?l
GRADE
145
RCP TO BE BURIED A
MINIMUM OF 12.0"
140
140
135
135
9+50
10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 30' HORIZ.
1" = &VERT.
CULVERT 8 - DOWNSTREAM
Ir•SI]
155
PROPOSED
GRADE
155
150
150
145
54"RCP
145
140
EXISTING
GRADE
RCP TO BE BURIED A
MINIMUM OF 12.0"
140
135
135
9+50
10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 30' HORIZ.
1"=&VERT.
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN:WR
DGN:WR CKD:WR
B2

ol
•
I
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
- - -
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARYSTREAM
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
a
LO
r
W
a
U
N
N
W RP E
5
0 20 40
SCALE: 1 inch = 40 ft.
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
C

14/ 16 J/ J/ I \WETLAND WIVI
I
1 y TOP OF BANK
TOE OF BANK
IPROPOSED 20'
PUBLIC UTILITY
\ EASEMENT
ss
/ I
SS
\ \ SS. 1 \
PROPOSED \
1RS SEWER MAIN \ \
\ (TYP.)
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
— — —
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
/ / / N
J DRY CREEK
PERENNIAL
STING 20'
PUIBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT
N9
ENT WETLAND)
-NT CONVERSION SANITAR/EXISTING 21"
ROSSINGY / / / \ PVC GRAVITY
/ /
- (1,662 SF) SEWERMAIN
/ �TIE TO EXISTING /
�/ / ✓ SEWER MANHOLE \ /
� I I
ol
\ \ WETLAND WM
a
I
I
�
I
I
�
I
I
II
I
I
�
I
1
I
I
I
I
i
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
O
H
W
a
U
N
W RP E
5
0 15 30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
D

/ /y4p / \
/ /
/PROPOSED 20' �\
PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT
Po
.k w�/ .� �� �' WE� NDWM )y/
Nk Nk * %4, .�• I / / I I / I
I
co
I
kPROPOSED
/DRY CREEK %,
AL WPERENNP.)
I
IMPACT W12
(TEMPORARY WETLAND)
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS I
0.128 AC - (5,548 SF)
RA
M
/��/�� �� /
� --
WETLAND M
�i% •l�
•li
IMPACT W13
(PERMANENT WETLAND)
PERMANENT CONVERSION -
GRAVITY SANITARY
SEWER CROSSING
0.140 AC - (6.085 SF)
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
- — -
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
- — -
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
/ TOP OF BANK
TOE OF BANK 'Y V,
EXISTING 20'
y / I 'v PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENT
EXISTING 21"
q� PVC GRAVITY V
SEWER MAIN /y, /
/ / IMPACT S8 /
(TEMPORARY STREAM) / `L �3� `Y r /
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS /�
23 F (C) 62 SF, 0.009 Af /
/ IMPACT S7
(PERMANENT STREAM -
NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
/ IMPACTW14 GRAVITYSANITARY
(TEMPORARY WETLAND) SEWER CROSSING
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS 21 LF - (347 SF, 0.008 AC)
0.038 AC - (1,630 SF)
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
O
H
W
a
U
N
W RP E
5
0 20 40
SCALE: 1 inch = 40 ft.
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
E

�e..
Vim_ A�.A���♦��♦.��V�V��V rrii � ����
MA
Flo
4,40
� � � I • . � � 1`�e•A���e`1IMPACT�e�e�:�'►,C���ew��e:�!`^ �?��w�!�����v `,���r:��������Ii; / � r.. rr`//rrr � • �
(TEMPORARY STREAM)
o � v�ee�eee►s..�� ;��.:�� �� %����•' Gam'��► = ��' . • .
����, ,o-oaf► 3 O �.e♦ems : �.!A�: ►.0
�
w2:��♦: �� v�����..���:♦:�♦♦. �' •
��`►►f1'�� O+eh� �oe�s �eAe w 4�-� ♦iw :�� ��c.,. • .
�� V���� ♦�V'w��as e,�! ��'�e�e�� �• ���Vj�e♦ • • I I I !�Iil� i �� �•�� p ��� �♦ `?�'�`
\� � �� i �����►���A�� �C���eeye�se�eeo��e�►� %"• ��:� V �/ � � � � 1 �i ' :S �'����� � �� ��♦���♦A������ ♦V♦���.►1y
`\. � � .': w � � . �' 0r6 `i! - ►"��:e`V': ���V>Cj� � �'��<I� '♦� ..: ��e��Q 'y ^►A O� � ,�� ,,`s ♦� !; AAi,,
IMPACTW1'�1 ��`'s�i'47�1�A1�,;'y �`'�♦C9�A �,,... v,�`S� `�eA'♦ . ��e,� �_ �.�� �, R I *a9�� 1� r� ♦ ��
• - �►a\�V��AAwpA���♦OA�C •: �i+i �A!. e � . C �r.� I. �� � �
• . . '�� V�♦O A�� Ate. �♦♦ems ♦�� A� A♦�� 14e O�� ri ♦ 1 e r�
WINE
���•,V �G •• � �ti 1 ♦,.ate \�/ S� `_`
• . j<''`;��` • ••A . I • .
r r .� , . - `
rr/i•��:.e�eeAe '!I' j0�~ • � . • � I I : � \�\\+��
� - :. a ��♦I� i � ��� `li,�����♦ � v
WM (PERMANENT WETLANDS)
140 / i l 1 RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
0.029 AC - (1,230 SF) /
135 IMPACT 422 / IMPACT S13 \� �25' IMPACT S11 / / / / APPROX. LOCATION //
—� �(TEMPORARYWETLAND) / (PERMANENT STREAM �i (PERMANENT STREAM) �'' .y/ OFEPNGGAS MAIN
/ / // 00
/
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS / �/ STREAM REALIGNMENT x VI
0.019 AC (817 SF) NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS) I •Y
GRAVITY SANITARY W I� 58 LF (962 SF, 0.022 AC) / / // / / APPROX. LOCATION OF
/ SEWER CROSSING EX. 6" PNG GAS MAIN
FEMA 100-YR / 21 LF - (264 SF, 0.006 AC) EXISTING 20' IMPACT S14UTILITY
— - FLOODPLAIN / y I �,/ I PUBEASEMENT y (TEMPORARY STREAM) / / y�o / / / / /� // r
WETVAND W`0 J / CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
W 21 LF - (237 SF, 0.006 AC)
i
ti� TOE OF BANK � � EXISTING 21"
``k TOP OF BANK .i. PVC GRAVITY .yI SEWER MAIN IMPACT W23
�
I /
v w w J %1, w \w \ 11w P (TEMPORARY WETLAND)
( I CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
0.081 AC - (3,519 SF)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
- — -
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARYSTREAM
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
a
i
/
I
I
II ��
/ / I
/
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
� / I
O
W
a
U
IN
W RIP E
5
0 25 50
SCALE: 1 inch = 50 ft.
WRJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
F1
z
0
V
F-
z
z
Q
2
V
z
z
0
z
N

CULVERT 6 - UPSTREAM
145
140
PROPOSED
GRADE
140
135
135
130
12' x 10'
RCBC
130
EXISTING
GRADE
125
4120
125
120
RCBC TO
MINIMUM
BE Bl
OF
TRIED A
2.0"
10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 50' HORIZ.
1" = 10' VERT.
CULVERT 6 - DOWNSTREAM
140 140
135
PROPOSED
GRADE
135
130
130
125
12' x 10'
RCBC
125
EXISTING
GRADE
RCBC TO
MINIMUM
BE B
OF
120
120
115
115
JRIED A
L2.0"
9+50 10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 50' HORIZ.
1" = 10' VERT.
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN:WR
DGN:WR CKD:WR
F2

V A \
135
IMPACT W24
\ I / (PERMANENT WETLANDS) I ROADWAY GRADING
LOT GRADING
0.136 AC - (5,897 SF)
\ 135 WETLAND / / / / / /
\ \ \ \ I °° / / / / / lo
WAQ
cq
\ / h
\\\ \.135
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
— — —
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
/ / I I ../.. / .i
I / /
FEMA 100-YR I
/ FLOODPLAIN I / a
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LO
r
W
a
U
N
W RP E
5
0 20 40
SCALE: 1 inch = 40 ft.
W RJ.b N.. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
G
z
0
V
F-
z
z
x
V
z
z
0
z
N

IMPACTW26
WETLANDS)
/
/
ROADWAY GRADING &
— —
LOT GRADING
0.176 AC - (7,652 SF)
16S
160
IMPACT W27
(TEMPORARY WETLAND)
'
v
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
0 003 AC - (131 SF)
ti
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
77000
/ RETAINING WALL W/
/ SAFETY FENCE
/ WETLAND WR /
b
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
- — -
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
/
--
C
}
/
ro
O
/
``
Ln
-
185
180
175�L
o
IMPACT W29(TEMPORARYWETLANr
r
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
_
\
Z
a
x
0.017 AC (702 SF)
—
—
— — �i
0
z
/
\
WETLAND
WR
\
IMPACT W28
\4/
Z
(PERMANENT WETLANDS)
v/\�
�/
Q
/
\ ROADWAY GRADING &
/
LOT GRADING
0.152 AC (6,604 SF)
(n
a
l
LJJ
_
/
,
/— —170—
I
0
,o
Z
U
�•
v/ \4/
\4/
14/
LLI
�c
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
A
N
rGo
r
M
5
0 15
30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
�
.�
'
WRJob DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR

\,7 \\
STREAM SO V A\ \\ \V A
INTERMITTENT
\STREAM SO
\ \
WET AND WR
PERENNIAL �A \\\ I-
I M PACT W30 y�
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ (TEMPORARY WETLAND) ✓ i
\ \ \ \ \ \ CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ►
0.005 AC - (191 SF)
\ IMPACT S15
(TEMPORARY STREAM)
— — — — — — — — — — ) CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
7LF-(17SF, 0.001AC)
IMPAC7Sl6
— — (PERMANENT STREAM) 104.64 LF_
ROADWAY GRADING 48',RCPx
251 LF - (813 SF, 0.019 AC) �. CULVERT 3
SS 44,9
s T
EX. 15"
(-PP TO RF
/ IMPACTS19
(PERMANENT STREAM) / /// j Z,
/ ROADWAY GRADING & /
/ LOT GRADING / 130 LF - (334 SF, 0.008 AC) STREAM SF
INTERMITTENT
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
/
I
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
— — —
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
r. EX. 24"
/ CPP TO BE
L REMOVED
SEE SHEET 6 FOR RIP RAP BASIN
ENERGY DISSIPATER DETAIL
IMPACT
/
(PERMANENT WETLANDS)
/
/
ROADWAY GRADING
0.047 AC - (2,023 SF)
\
�
IMPACT
(TEMPORARY WETLAND)
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
—
IMPACTS17
(PERMANENT STREAM-
\
NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
�2g
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER
— —
11 LF - (34 SF, 0.001 AC)
130
IMPACT S18
'N,(TEMPORARY
STREAM)
130
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
7 LF - (26 SF, 0.001
�2S
\ \ TOP OF BANK
\ \ TOE OF BANK
\ \ \ \ \ V WETL$ND WAJJ v
FEMA 100-YR
FLOODPLAIN \ A A \
\ STREAM SE
\ PERENNIAL \ \ \
—125
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
O
W
a
U
N
W RIP E
5
0 20 40
SCALE: 1 inch = 40 ft.
WRJ.b N.. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
11
z
0
V
F-
z
a
x
V
z
z
0
z
N

[oil] AV4:49clalJ9►119:10-A&I
135
130
130
125
PROPOSED
GRADE
125
48"
RCP
120
RCP TO BE BURIED
MINIMUM OF 9.6"
115
120
EXISTING
A
(20%)
GRADE
115
110
1
1
110
10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 40' HORIZ.
1" = 8' VERT.
N
Call] AV4:411cm9116TVl,1.119:70_1uI
135
135
130
130
125
PROPOSED
GRADE
125
120
48" RCP
120
RCP
INIMUM
TO BE
OF
BURIED
9.6"
(20%)
A
EXISTING
GRADE
115
115
110
110
9+50 10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 40' HORIZ.
1" = 8' VERT.
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN:WR
DGN:WR CKD:WR
J2

\ \ \ \ \ \ TOP OF BANK
\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ TOE OF BANK
PROPOSED 20,
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ PUBLIC UTILITY \\ \
\ EASEMENT
s I 1 ss
IMPACT S21
\ \ 1 \ 1 (TEMPORARY STREAM) \ \\ \
\ y I CONSTRUCTION ACCESS \ \ \ \
22 LF - (122 SF, 0.003 AC)
� I
WETLAND WAK
� I
IMPACT S20
(PERMANENT STREAM -
\ \ \ I I I \ NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
\ \ I I I I GRAVITY SANITARY
SEWER CROSSING
27 LF - (181 SF, 0.005 AC)
WETLAIND WAN I `\
I\ \ I I I I I FEMA 100-YR
1 11 II II I I I FLOODPLAIN46
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
- - -
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARYSTREAM
\ STREAM SAD
PERENNIAL
�j \
I PROPOSED I I I \
SEWER MAIN I \ \ I I \ \ \
(TYP.) I I \ I I \
-Ss ss II V A
,s
IMPACT W34 \ \\\\\ \
(TEMPORARY WETLAND) \
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
0.026 AC - (1,109 SF)
1 \ \ \ IA \
IMPACT W33
(PERMANENT WETLAND)
PERMANENT CONVERSION -
GRAVITY SANITARY
SEWERCROSSING
0.024 AC - (1,009
\ \ 1 I I I FEMA 100-YR \
FLOODPLAIN I A
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
O
W
a
U
Z
J
F-
LU
Q
3
0
Q
a
G
Q
w
H
N
w
5
0 15 30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
K

J
I \\ �RETAINING WALL W/ \ \ \ \ \
I \ SAFETY FENCE,
WETLAND WU
I / I
IMPACT W35 vy�
(TEMPORARY WETLAND)
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
0.003 AC - (107 SF) i
/ APPROX. LOCATION / / IMPACT W36
/ OF EX. ABANDONED /
\ y / PNG GAS MAIN / / (PERMANENTROADWAY GRADING
/ EX. 50' PIEDMONT 0.014 AC - (610 SF)
NATURAL GAS PUE
/
\ /<Gqs / / \� APPROX. LOCATION OF
EX. 6" PNG GAS MAIN
/l
GAS\
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
p
BMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
- — -
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
I
C
SA Cy-
.
AF` z
O
w
a
U
N
W RP E
5
0 15 30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
W RJ.b N.. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN:WR DGN:WR CKD:WR
L

VI
Z
LO
r
W
a
Q
U
N
N
W RP E
5
0 20 40
SCALE: 1 inch = 40 ft.
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
M1

Call] AV4:49 El 1to] 9.119:7: f_1ul
150
145
PROPOSED
GRADE
145
140
EXISTING
GRADE
140
24" RCP
135
135
130
RCP TO
MINIMUM
BE
BURIED,
OF4.8"(:
130
125
125
10+00 10+50
0%)
SCALE:
1 = 40 HORIZ.
1" = 8' VERT.
Call] AV4:4Ell a9116TVl,1.119:70_1ul
150
150
145
145
140
PROPOSED
GRADE
24"RCP
140
135
EXISTING
GRADE
135
130
130
RCP
MINIMUM
TO BE
BURIED
OF4.8"(,
125
I125
9+50 10+00 10+50
SCALE:
4
!0%)
1" = 40' HORIZ.
1" = 8' VERT.
Z
L0
r
W
a
Q
U
N
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN: WR
DGN: WR CKD: WR
M2

1 / ` WETLAND WAA
\ / / cq5 / \ -
� \ / EX. 24" \ � CPP� _ _ /
GqS� �\-------WETLANDWX /' I I I I \ // // //
IMPACT S26 \Gqs
/ASS / / \ / _ (TEMPORARY STREAM) / CONSTRUCTION ACCESS APPROX. LOCATION OF /
— J \ \ — _ �� I
/ EX. 6" PNG GAS MAIN WETLAND WAC \
/ / \ 28 LF - (180 SF, 0.005 AC) \ Gqs-
/ APPROX. LOCATION
/ STREAM SQ
INTERMITTENT /
I
/
/
I r � �
I /
\ MA 1FE00-YRFMA
AIN\
K
I I I WETLAN
I � I
G OF EX.ABANDONED / I
\� G\ EX. 12" CPP qs \ I / I PNG GAS MAIN
`EX. 50' PIEDMONT
G\ IMPACT W40 �� \ f NATURAL GAS PUE
(TEMPORARY WETLAND)
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ✓ / / / % / / /
SS \� I 0.014AC-(609SF)
IMPACT S29 \GAS
(TEMPORARY STREAM)
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS\G \ T \ Gq I
� 25 LF - (52 SF, 0.002 AC)
TOP OF BANK ' IMPACT W39 \ EX. 36" CPP y
TOE OF BANK (PERMANENT WETLAND) � � � \ � ��\ l � I Gqs
I / PERMANENT CONVERSION \ !i \
,M SR / / GRAVITY SANITARY
TENT S �� G
I I SEWER CROSSING / S / IMPACT S31
\ / I / / / I
0.015 AC (652 SF) (TEMPORARY STREAM)
PROPOSED C)
I %� CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
I IMPACT S28 / SEWER MAIN \ / 21 LF - (101 SF, 0.003 A
1 (PERMANENT STREAM (TYP.)
r I I I NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS) / TI PROPOSED 20'
I GRAVITY SANITARY
i \ WFTI ANWAR . . PUBLIC UTILITY \ \ \
IMPACT S30
(PERMANENT STREAM- /
NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS) /
GRAVITY SANITARY / r
SEWER CROSSING
/ 22 LF - (87 SF, 0.002 AC) /
/ 1 /
I �
\ STREAM SS \ \ \
PERENNIAL \ 1
yWETLAND WAS \ \ \\ \
\ \\ \\TOP OF BANK \ \\ \ \
\TOE OFBANK \ \\ \ \ \\
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
O
H
W
a
U
Z
J
�
w
Q
3
0
H
Q
Q
a
G
�
Q
w
H
N
W
5
0 15 30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
N

WETLAND WAD
PROPOSED
SEWER MAIN
IMPACTS33//�
(TEMPORARY STREAM) \� i / i /
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
21 LF (91 SF, 0.002 AC) PROPOSED 20'
PUBLIC UTILITY
> >y
165 / / / 0' ii% �� — / / EASEMENT
5 TOP OF BANK . -L /
TOE OF BANK
STREAM SS
PERENNIAL
IMPACT S32 / / / / / ✓ / / / / \
50 / — (PERMANENT STREAM
�145 ��� r� / / / / / / / / / i NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
/ / / GRAVITY SANITARY
SEWER CROSSING
22 LF - (145 SF, 0.004 AC)
WETLANDWAC
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
— — —
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
L0
r
W
a
U
N
N
W RP E
5
0 15 30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
WRJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
0

co
I M PACT W42 /
(PERMANENT WETLANDS)
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER IMPACTS36
0.001 AC (40 SF) a. .
/ (PERMANENT STREAM) i
ROADWAY GRADING
IMPACT S35 191 LF (1,013 SF, 0.024 AC)
(PERMANENT STREAM \
/ NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER /
9 LF (47 SF, 0.001 AC)
— — _ WETLAND
IMPACT S34 / —
WAG cp
/ (TEMPORARY STREAM)
/
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS � — � � — 170 CULVERT 5 —_
4LF-(19SF, 0.001AC) —
141.75LF
- 42" RCP
/
cp
/ �65//// \ // ! / /
SEE SHEET 6 FOR /
RIP -RAP BASIN ENERGY
DISSIPATER DETAIL
WET AL ND WAF
/ /
IMPACT W41
STREAM SS / (TEMPORARY WETLAND)
_ PERENNIAL �� / CONSTRUCTION ACCESS /
� / �/ i / �� � / 0.005AC-(216SF) / / � •<a
RETAINING WALL W/ /
SAFE FENCE /
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
— — —
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARY STREAM
i
TOPOFBANK
TOE OF BANK / J
STREAM SS PERENNIAL WETLAND W AB
IMPACT 537
(TEMPORARY STREAM)
/ CONSTRUCTION ACCESS /
4LF-(10SF, 0.001AC)41
/
I M ACT W44
/ (TEMPORARY WETLAND)
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS �b5
0.004 AC - (155 SF) / i
i
IMPACT W43 /
(PERMANENT WETLANDS)
ROADWAY GRADING & /
s LOT GRADING /
0.095 AC - (4,134 SF)
\cp, /cp-
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
0
H
W
a
U
N
W RP E
�P-
5
0 15 30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
WRJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
P1
z
0
V
F-
z
z
a
x
V
z
z
0
z
N

CULVERT 5 - UPSTREAM
170
165
- PROPOSED
GRADE
165
160
160
42"
RCP
155
RCP TO BE BURIED A
MINIMUM OF 8.4" (20%)
155
EXISTING
GRADE
150
150
10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 30' HORIZ.
1" = & VERT.
CULVERT 5 - DOWNSTREAM
170
170
165
PROPOSED
GRADE
165
160
160
42" RCP
155
155
150
RCP TO BE BURIED A
MINIMUM OF 8.4" (20%)
EXISTING
GRADE
150
9+50
10+00 10+50
SCALE:
1" = 30' HORIZ.
1"=&VERT.
W RJob No.
DATE
02201372
01/23/2023
DRN:WR
DGN:WR CKD:WR
P2

0
ss
WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION
SUBMITTED TO USACE ON 04/25/2022
(SAW-2022-00968)
I
I
l �
/ X
PROPOSED 20'
PUBLIC UTILITY
\ EASEMENT
I �
/ I Co' l 1 \
IMPACT LEGEND
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
PERMANENT WETLANDS (PERMANENT CONVERSION)
®
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
F
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
- - -
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
0
TEMPORARYSTREAM
PROPOSED
SEWER MAIN
(TYP.)
WETLAND WAH
/ IMPACT W45
/ (PERMANENT WETLAND)
/ PERMANENT CONVERSION //
/ GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER ,r // /
CROSSING 0.056 AC - (2,402 SF)41
IMPACT W46
(TEMPORARY WETLAND) J' y✓ //' / /- \ \
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
\ \ 0.029 AC - (1,258 SF)
a
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
0
H
w
a
U
Z
J
�
w
Q
3
0
Q
a
�
Q
W
F-
N
w
5
0 15 30
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 ft.
W RJob No. DATE
02201372 01/23/2023
DRN: WR DGN: WR CKD: WR
Q