BPDP for PN

ID#* 20201366 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:
Blake Hartshorn
Initial Review Completed Date 03/20/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 3/17/2023
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Barrett Jenkins [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20201366 Version:* 2
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Foy Farm Nutrient Mitigation Site
County: Jones
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: BPDPV3 Foy Farm 3.17.2023.pdf 27.93MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Barrett Jenkins
Signature:
fir! t to

1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604
March 17, 2023

To: Katie Merritt,
Nutrient Offset &Buffer Banking Coordinator
NCDWR 401& Buffer Permitting Branch

RE: Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank BPDP DWR#2021-1366v2 Comment Responses to second draft and
Submittal of Third Draft

In response to comments received from you by Restoration Systems (RS) on March 13, 2023 regarding
the Second Draft Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) for the Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel, RS
is submitting this response to comments including the third draft of the BPDP, attached after comment
responses.

All comments were extracted from the received PDF and copied below. Responses in Blue Italics.

We appreciate your attention and look forward to hearing back from you on this draft and finalizing the
BPDP.

Sincerely,

Barrett Jenkins

1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604
RS response to DWR comments on Initial Draft of Foy Farm BPDP

Page 16
1. Insert text: “riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas”
Updated

Page 18
2. Delete “buffer restoration”
Updated

Page 28
3. As noted in previous comments, change “Restoration “ to “Riparian Restoration”
Updated

4. Delete preservation symbology. Since the site is not generating buffer preservation credits, and
all of these areas are already called out as open water, wetland, forested etc. the symbology is
not necessary and it does not comply with the nutrient offset UMBI and it adds confusion.
Updated

5. Fix symbology to show ditches properly
Updated

6. Rectangle showing buffer adjustment
Noted

7. According to this map the pond is still being shown as creditable area because it is shown as
restoration for NOC. Per the UMBI credit assets are measured from top o fbank of feature
perpendicular and landward out to 200ft. to correct this, credits should be measured fro the
origin off of feature 1b (the radius is measured incorrectly. Please see teal area (rectangle)
Updated. Acreage through BPDP updated as well.

Page 29
8. See comment on Figure 7 to fix this area)
Updated

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE

FOY FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL

NEUSE RIVER BASIN

DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2

Bank Parcel Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
POC: Barrett Jenkins ([e-mail])
Ph: 919-755-9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Table of Contents pg. i
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE

FOY FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL

March 17, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Mitigation Project Summary ............................................................................................................ 1
Project Goals ......................................................................................................................... 1
Existing Parcel Conditions ..................................................................................................... 2
Watershed Characterization................................................................................................. 3
Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 4
Geology ................................................................................................................................. 4
Existing Vegetative Communities ......................................................................................... 4
Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................................... 4
Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas ................................................. 5
FEMA Floodplain Compliance ............................................................................................... 5
Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access................................................................... 5
Existing Utility Line ............................................................................................................... 5
Other Environmental Conditions .......................................................................................... 5
Site Protection Instrument .............................................................................................................. 5
Mitigation Work Plan ....................................................................................................................... 6
Parcel Preparation ................................................................................................................ 6
Diffused Flow ........................................................................................................................ 6
Riparian Area Restoration Activities ..................................................................................... 6
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan .................................................................................................. 8
Monitoring Protocol ............................................................................................................. 8
Parcel Maintenance .............................................................................................................. 8
Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries .......................................................................... 9
Financial Assurances and Long-Term Management ........................................................................ 9
Financial Assurances ............................................................................................................. 9
Long Term Management Plan .............................................................................................. 9
Project Credit Potential .................................................................................................................. 10
Credit Release ................................................................................................................................ 10
References ..................................................................................................................................... 10

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Table of Contents pg. ii
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
TABLES

Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals ................................................................................................ 1
Table 2: Project Attributes & Timeline ......................................................................................................... 2
Table 3: Project Features .............................................................................................................................. 3
Table 4: Project Soil Types and Descriptions ................................................................................................ 4
Table 5: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership ................................................................................................. 6
Table 6: Proposed Hardwood and Shrub Bare Root Planting Plan by Species* ........................................... 7
Table 7: Proposed Seed Mix .......................................................................................................................... 7
Table 8: Foy Farm, DWR # 2020-1366v2, Project Credit Table ................................................................... 11

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Figures, Historic Aerial Imagery (EDR), Existing Condition Photos
Figure 1 – Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2 – Site Map and Existing Conditions
Figure 3 – USGS Map
Figure 4 – NRCS Map
Figure 5 – Restoration Plan
Figure 6 – Credit Map
Figure 7 – Monitoring Map
Historic Aerial Imagery – EDR
Parcel Photos – Existing Conditions

Appendix B – DWR Correspondence

Appendix C – USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report

Appendix D – NHP & USFWS Reports

Appendix E – EDR Report

Appendix F – SHPO Correspondence

Appendix G – Template Conservation Easement
Bank Parcel Development Package
Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
Jones County, NC – Neuse River Basin
Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 1
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

Introduction
Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel ("Parcel" or "Site") is proposed under the terms and conditions of
the proposed Restoration Systems Neuse 04 Nutrient Offset Umbrella Banking Instrument (UBI), which
will be made and entered into by Restoration Systems, LLC (RS), acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR).
The Parcel shall be planned and designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0703, and the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295.

Located in Jones County, North Carolina, the project encompasses 78.23 acres of land utilized for row crop
production and in existing forest/pond/wetland. The project will restore the riparian area in accordance
with the buffer mitigation rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n), along six (6) unnamed tributaries and two (2)
surface water conveyances (ditches and ephemeral channels) with hydrologic connection to the Trent
River and subsequently the Neuse River and Estuary. The primary purpose of the Parcel is to provide
nutrient offset credits for stormwater and wastewater requirements within the United States Geological
Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020204. The Parcel is located 0.75 miles south of the Trent River.

The Parcel is located three miles west of the town of Trenton in Jones County, NC (Appendix A, Figure 1).
Restoration Systems, LLC is the current owner of land associated with the Bank Parcel, which has been
historically and is currently used as agricultural fields with minimal existing forest/non-agricultural area.
The Parcel is within the Neuse River Basin 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit 03020204010070 of the Middle
Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub-basin Number 03-04-11)
(Appendix A, Figure 1).

DWR representatives conducted an on-site stream determination and issued a Stream Determination
letter for the Parcel on March 18, 2021. Subsequently a revised Site Viability for Buffer & Nutrient Offset
letter was provided by the Division on March 18, 2021. Both letters are provided in Appendix B.

Mitigation Project Summary

Project Goals
The primary goals of the proposed nutrient offset project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Neuse River Basin by restoring the riparian area to create a functional, forested,
riparian corridor. Specific improvements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined below in
Table 1.

Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Goal Objective
Decrease nutrient levels
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the agricultural fields
through restored native buffer zones. The off-site nutrient input will also be
absorbed on-site by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain areas,
where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation.

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 2
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals (Continued)
Goal Objective
Decrease sediment input Sediment from off-site sources will be captured by deposition on restored
floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities.
Decrease water temperature
and increase dissolved
oxygen concentrations
Planted riparian trees will shade the streams as they mature, reducing thermal
pollution.
Create appropriate
terrestrial habitat Buffer areas will be restored by planting native vegetation.
Permanently protect the
project Parcel from harmful
uses
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.

Existing Parcel Conditions
The proposed nutrient offset project includes approximately 78.23 acres of open agricultural fields and
existing forested floodplains/wetlands/ponds along unnamed tributaries to Trent River. The agricultural
fields are currently being used for row crop production, including corn and soybeans. In addition, the
farmer regularly applies fertilizers and herbicides to the fields (Appendix A, Figure 3). Land use and general
site conditions have not changed since the site photos in Appendix A were taken.

Site features predominantly originate on-site, and all drain to Trent River approximately 0.75 miles
downstream. A review of historic aerials shows the property has been historically and consistently utilized
for row crop production (Appendix A).

Table 2: Project Attributes & Timeline
Project Name Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020204
River Basin Neuse
Geographic Location (Lat, Long) 35.086417°, -77.401632°
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG) To be recorded
Total Credits 47.01 acres (106,855.375 lbs of nitrogen offset credit)
Types of Credits Nitrogen Offset Credits
BPDP Date December 2022
Initial Planting Date February 2024
Baseline Report Date March 2024
MY1 Report Date December 2024
MY2 Report Date December 2025
MY3 Report Date December 2026
MY4 Report Date December 2027
MY5 Report Date December 2028

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 3
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
DWR performed an on-site visit of the Parcel to determine applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A
NCAC 02B .0734) and viability to provide nutrient offset credits on December 9, 2020. A copy of both the
"On-Site Origin Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules" and "Site Viability for Buffer
Mitigation and Nutrient Offset" are provided in Appendix B. In addition, a summary of their
determinations, specific to Parcel Features, is shown in Table 3 and correlated with stream segments as
labeled in Figure 2, Appendix A. There have been no changes to land use in the project area since DWR's
site visit, and project photos contained in Appendix A were taken.

Table 3: Project Features
DWR Feature ID In Field Classification Subject to Buffer
Rules
Nutrient Offset
Viability
1a Stream Yes Yes
1a Pond In-line Pond Yes Yes
1b Ditch >3ft depth No Yes
1(located above ditch 1b) Pond No No
2 In-line Pond No No
3a/origin Stream w/ in-line pond Yes Yes
3b Ditch >3ft depth No Yes
4a/start Stream w/in-line pond Yes No
4b starts below pond and ends
at 4d
Stream within and old
impoundment Yes Yes
4c wetland No No
4d see map Stream Yes Yes
5a In-line pond Yes Yes
5b Stream Yes Yes
6a Stream Yes Yes
6b Ditch NA Yes
7a/origin Stream within an old
impoundment Yes Yes
7b Wetland No No
8a Stream Yes No
8b In-line pond Yes Yes

Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within USGS HUC 03020204 and DWR Subbasin 03-04-11. Features drain to Trent
River, which is classified as C and NSW by DWR. Class C waters are designated for recreational use,
agriculture, fishing and fish consumption, and the maintenance of biological integrity for wildlife. The NSW
designation applies to surface waters that are experiencing excessive growths of microscopic or
macroscopic vegetation.

The Parcel topography, as indicated on the Phillips Crossroads, NC USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, suggest a historic ox bow to the Trent River and elevation changes relative to historic and
existing pond footprints Parcel (Figure 3). Land uses draining to the project reaches are primarily
agriculture with some forested use.

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 4
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Soils
The Parcel is mapped by the Jones County Soil Survey. Project soils are described below in Table 4. An
image of the paper copy of the 1981 Soil Survey of Jones County is provided in Figure 4. A custom soil
report is provided in Appendix C.

Table 4: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Map Unit
Symbol Map Unit Name Percent of
Bank Parcel
Hydric
Soil Rating
AnB Alpin fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes 4.7 No
ExA Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 27.2 No
Gr Grantham loam 0.0 Yes
La Leaf silt loam 14.3 Yes
Ln Leon sand 5.7 Yes
MaC Marvyn loamy sand, 6 to 15 percent slope 0.0 No
Mk Muckalee loam 7.9 Yes
Na Nahunta loam 9.8 No
NoB Norfolk loamy sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes 15.5 No
W Water 14.8 No
Source: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm

Geology
The Parcel is in the Inner Coastal Plain physiographic province. The landscape is characterized by flatlands
to gently rolling hills and valleys. The Coastal Plain primarily consists of marine sedimentary rocks
comprised of sand, clay, and limestone formed through the deposition of estuarine and marine sediments
within the last 140 million years. According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the underlying
geology of the Parcel is mapped as Spring Garden Member of the Castle Hayne Formation and is described
as molluscan-mold limestone, indurated, and very sandy, grading downward into calcareous sand and
laterally into Comfort Member.

Existing Vegetative Communities
Existing vegetation within the Parcel consists of active row crop fields, ponds, wetlands, and vegetated
floodplains, as shown in the attached site photos (Appendix A).

Threatened and Endangered Species
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
Information for Planning and Consultation database (IPaC) were searched for federally listed threatened
and endangered plant and animal species that may occur on the Parcel. None were documented to occure
within the Parcel. NHP identified occurrences of the Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), North
Carolina Spiny Crayfish (Orconectes carolinensis), Shinging Clubtail (Stylurus ivae), Least Brook Lamprey
(Lampetra aepyptera), Mimic Shine ( (Notropis volucellus), Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus), Emmon’s
Sedge (Carex emmonsii), and Spring-flowering Goldenrod (Solidago verna) within a one mile radius of the
Parcel, and USFWS identified 6 species as follows: Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis),
Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus), Red-cockaded Woodpecekr
(Picoides borealis), American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), and Monarch Butterfly (Danaus
plexippus) within the area. RS performed pedestrian surveys of the Parcel in December 2021 and
Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 5
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
determined no suitable habitat for the species with the proposed Parcel. The USFWS Self-Certification
Letter, USFWS response letter, and NHP Report are included in Appendix D.
The presence of conditions or characteristics that can hinder restoration activities on the Parcel was
evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials, utilities, and
restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, the potential for
hydrologic trespass, and existing utility easements. Existing information regarding Parcel constraints was
acquired and reviewed. As a result of our review and field surveys, no known Parcel constraints exist
that may hinder proposed restoration activities. Potential constraints reviewed include the following:
Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
There are no existing structures in the project area or on the larger tract of land. SHPO was contacted with
a request for review and comment on April 4, 2022, and concluded in a response letter on July 28, 2022,
that "We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be
affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed." All communication
with SHPO is included in Appendix F.
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No grading activities are proposed in the floodplain, so a floodplain development permit will not be
required. Additionally, no hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project.
Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access
The Parcel is in rural Jones County, near the town of Trenton. The Parcel is accessible for construction,
monitoring, and long-term stewardship from Middle Farm and Nobles Loop Road (Appendix A, Figure 3).
An access road and associated access easement will be detailed in the final conservation easement survey
and recorded at the Jones County Register of Deeds. DOT right of ways, powerlines, and associated
easements will be excluded from the conservation easement.
Existing Utility Line
An existing utility power line runs from Middle Farm Road across Feature 3 and also parallel to the pond
portion of Feature 3b. Restoration Systems plans to relocate the power line running parallel to the pond
and exclude the line crossing Feature 3 from any credit generation, but include it in the conservation
easement as a Maintenance Area Right of Way (ROW). Our conservation easement will be subordinate
to the powerline maintenance within this Maintenance Area right of Way (ROW) footprint at a 40 foot
width as shown on Appendix A Figure 7b, but exclude any other activities from occurring in the
Maintenance Area ROW.
Other Environmental Conditions
A limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was completed for the Parcel by acquiring an
Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) Radius Map Report with Geocheck for the Parcel on March 28,
2022. There was an incident in 2010 reported on land adjacent to the Parcel related to the illegal dumping
of petroleum contaminated soil, during which the Division of Water Quality and Army Corp of Engineers
were notified, and for which it appears the issue has been resolved. The historic landowner indicated the
location of the dumping outside of the proposed conservation easement. The action should have not
impact on the proposed project.
Site Protection Instrument

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 6
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes portions
of the larger tract of land listed in Table 5. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its
entirety by an approved DWR conservation easement, and managed/held by an approved DWR long-term
steward under the terms detailed in the approved conservation easement. A template conservation
easement that will be used to develop the conservation easement for this Parcel is provided in Appendix
G.

Table 5: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Owner Name D.B/Pg. NC PIN# Acreage
Restoration Systems, LLC 426/297 447980516300 236.74

Mitigation Work Plan
The project will restore agriculturally impacted land in the Parcel footprint to a forested riparian corridor,
protected in perpetuity, improving the ecological function of the area. In addition, the project design will
ensure that no adverse impacts to wetlands or existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 6 illustrates the
conceptual design for the Parcel.

Parcel Preparation
The land use within 200 feet from the top of bank of project features is either forested and will not be
impacted, or is agricultural land maintained for crops. Areas slated for restoration may require soil testing
and will be ripped to break up compact soil. No permits are necessary, including 404 (US Army Corps of
Engineers), 401 (NC Division of Water Resources), and Land Quality Erosion and Sediment Control (NC
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources). Site preparation will include select herbicide treatments
and/or limited mechanical clearing to remove undesirable vegetation and may include soil amendments.
Where needed, invasive species will be selectively removed and/or spot treated by a licensed pesticide
applicator.

Diffused Flow
Per DWR Buffer Interpretation/Clarification Memo #2008-019 – Diffuse Flow, stormwater carried by
lateral ditches that enter buffered streams will receive a 4,350 sq. ft. credit deduction. The credit
deduction will be calculated at start of the credit generating area from any features subject to the Diffuse
Flow Memo (Appendix A, Figures 5 and 6). The site includes one deduction for diffuse flow at the top of
Feature 3 as shown on Figure 7 and 7B.

Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree and shrub species along the riparian
corridor, see Figure 6. Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first
few years of tree establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable
species that may out-compete the planted native vegetation. Tree and shrub species planted across the
Parcel are planned to include the species and percentages listed in Table 6. Bareroot stems will be well
mixed prior to planting to ensure diversity of bare roots across planted areas and monitoring plots. Species
availability at the time of planting may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species
listed as substitutes at the bottom of Table 6, with each substitute species not to exceed 10% of total
planted stems. Final species composition and density will be detailed in the As-built Report. DWR will be
notified for approval prior to planting if the species density and diversity outlined below are not available
for planting. Trees and shrubs will be planted throughout the area to be planted as shown on Figure 6,
including non-credit generating areas including those removed for diffuse flow calculations and those

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 7
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
areas less than 50 feet and/or greater than 200 feet from the top of bank. The riparian buffers and
adjacent riparian areas will be planted along six unnamed tributaries and two ditches as well as adjacent
in line ponds, all hydrologically connected and draining to the Trent River.

Table 6: Proposed Hardwood and Shrub Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name Scientific Name % of Total Planted Trees Canopy Type
River birch Betula nigra 10% Canopy
Tulip poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 5% Canopy
Red mulberry Morus rubra 10% Midstory
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 10% Canopy
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 10% Canopy
Water oak Quercus nigra 10% Canopy
Willow oak Quercus phellos 10% Canopy
American elm Ulmus americana 10% Canopy
Red bud Cercis canadensis 5% Midstory
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 10% Canopy
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5% Canopy
Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera 5% Shrub/Midstory
Proposed Substitutes
Black gum Nyssa sylvatica <10% Midstory
White oak Quercus alba <10% Canopy
Hackberry Celtis occidentalis <10% Midstory
Red Oak Carya illinoinensis <10% Canopy

Trees and shrubs will be planted at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 planted trees and shrubs per acre at the end of five years of monitoring.
In addition, no one tree or shrub species will be greater than 50% of the established stems. An appropriate
seed mix of annual and perennial species listed below in Table 7 will also be applied to provide temporary
and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during rain events in
areas without existing herbaceous cover. Planting is tentatively scheduled for February 2024 at a density
of 680 stems per acre on 8ft x 8ft spacing.

Table 7: Proposed Seed Mix
Common Name Scientific Name Annual/Perennial
Plains Coreopsis Coreopsis tinctoria Annual
Deertongue, Tioga Panicum clandestinum Perennial
Blackeyed Susan Rudbeckia hirta Perennial
Purpletop Tridens flavus Perennial
Lanceleaf Coreopsis Coreopsis lanceloata Perennial
Clasping Coneflower Rudbeckia amplexicaulis Annual
Oxeye Sunflower Heliopsis helianthoides Perennial
Common Yarrow Achillea millefolium Perennial
Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 8
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Perennial Gaillardia (Blanketflower) Gaillardia aristata Perennial
Purple Coneflower Echinacea purpurea Perennial
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
Monitoring Protocol
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the riparian buffer
restoration and nutrient offset areas to measure the survival of the planted trees and shrubs. The plots
will be randomly placed throughout the total restoration area. A total of 39 plots (2% of the restoration
total restoration area as shown in Figure 7 and defined to include areas within the 200 foot buffer
including non-credit areas such as those excluded for diffuse flow, and excluding Maintenance ROWs and
those areas outside of the maximum creditable 200 foot buffer width) will be established within the
riparian restoration areas (Figure 7). The size of individual quadrants will be 100 square meters.
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008). A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner
of each of the 39 plots. Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in
the annual reports. All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Planting is scheduled for February 2024. The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end
of the first growing season, at least five months after planting has been completed and no earlier than the
fall season. Species composition and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot based on
data collected on species, height, planting or volunteer date, and vigor. The total number of volunteer
woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure of vegetative success for the Parcel will
be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree and shrub species, where no one species is greater
than 50% of the established planted stems, and an established density of at least 260 planted trees and
shrubs per acre at the end of monitoring year five. Appropriate and desirable native volunteer species
may be included in the Parcel's density to meet the performance standards with DWR approval.
Restoration Systems shall submit the annual monitoring report to DWR by December 31 of each year for
five consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the UBI.
Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood
of affecting the project's success. Such items include but are not limited to fire, flooding, drought, or
insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success
criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel maintenance
performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year. A rigorous herbicide schedule may need
to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent the
establishment of invasive species that may out-compete the planted native vegetation. The only
herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations. The Parcel contains one Maintenance
Area Right of Way along an existing power line easement. The Maintenance ROW as shown in Figure 7 is
intended to delineate the area under which an existing utility line maintenance easement previously exists
and through which regular maintenance of the power line corridor may continue. The Parcel’s
conservation easement will overlap this area, but be subordinate to the maintenance and operation of
the power line.
Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 9
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions and any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to DWR. If
mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Neuse Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to ensure
that no buffer violations have occurred.
Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, post, tree-blazing, or other means as
allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement and will be clearly marked prior to the Task 2
site visit by DWR. Boundary markers that have been disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired
and/or replaced on an as needed basis. Contact information for the conservation easement holder will be
included on easement markers. A complete and detailed survey of the easement boundaries will be
included in the As-Built Report.
Within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the nutrient offset areas, the Sponsor will
submit written notification to DWR documenting that all nutrient offset activities have been completed.
Failure to submit written notification within 30 days may result in a modified credit release schedule or a
delay in the issuance of credit releases. Notification shall include all the items as specified in the UBI.
Financial Assurances and Long-Term Management
Financial Assurances
Following approval of the Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel Development Package, the Sponsor shall
provide a Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A-"as rated by A. M. Best. The
performance bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the project as
described in the Bank Parcel Development Package, but not less than $150,000. In lieu of posting the
performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit release. In that
case, no performance bond will be necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate performance/maintenance bond will be
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less
than $100,000. The performance/maintenance bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring period
for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon DWR approval, this
may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next year's monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted
without proof of bond renewals when applicable.
Long Term Management Plan
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved DWR long-term
steward, and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved DWR conservation easement. The
long-term manager will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure that the restrictions

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 10
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity. The conservation easement will be
transferred to the long term steward in accordance with the requirements of the UBI.

Project Credit Potential
Of the 78.23 acres protected under the conservation easement, 49.82 acres are anticipated to be planted
and of those 47.46 included in the Total Restoration Area as shown on Figure 7, and 47.01 acres are
anticipated to provide Nitrogen Nutrient Offset Credits (Figure 7) equivalent to 106,855.375 lbs. of
nitrogen offset credit. Riparian area restoration, with a minimum of 50-feet from the top of bank (TOB),
out 200-feet from the TOB, will general Nutrient Offset Credit. The nutrient offset credit summary below
was derived based on Restoration Systems' conceptual design and may be adjusted in the As-built Report.
The management objectives, mitigation type, and proposed credits are presented in detail in the Project
Credit Table provided in Table 9. These Nutrient Offset Credits will be neither convertible or transferable
to any other credit type, including Riparian Buffer Mitigation. There are some riparian areas that will be
included in the conservation easement but not receiving any credit due to the following conditions:
preservation, location outside of the minimum 50 foot and maximum 200 foot buffer width, location
withing the maintenance ROW, or they are excluding for diffuse flow accounting. Areas not credited for
diffuse flow and maintenance ROW are shown on the Credit Table below. All areas excluded from
crediting withing the Conservation Easement footprint are shown on Figure 7.

Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by DWR, the
mitigation credits associated with the Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel will be released as described
in the credit release schedule found in the UBI

References

Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.

North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina: North Carolina Geological Survey,
General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1366v2) Pg. 11
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1366v2) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Appendix A – Figures, Historic Aerial Imagery (EDR), Existing Condition Photos

Figure 1 – Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2 – Site Map and Existing Conditions
Figure 3 – USGS Map
Figure 4 – NRCS Map
Figure 5 – Restoration Plan
Figure 6 – Credit Map
Figure 7 – Monitoring Map
Historic Aerial Imagery – EDR
Parcel Photos – Existing Conditions

!.
Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
USGS 8-Digit HUC: 03020204USGS 14-Digit HUC: 03020204010070NC DWR Sub-Basin: 03-04-11
35.086417°, -77.401632°
Trent River
Neuse River
Neuse River
New River
White Oak River
CRAVENCOUNTY
JONESCOUNTY
CRAVENCOUNTY
ONSLOWCOUNTY
LENOIRCOUNTY
DUPLINCOUNTY
CARTERETCOUNTY
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance
Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
1³
Jones County, NC
RJH
FEB. 2023
1:215,000
2020-1366v2
VICINITY MAP
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
Legend
!.Foy Farm Bank Parcel Location Pin
NC Major Rivers
Neuse River USGS 8-Digitl HUC 03020204, Service Area for Nutrient Offset Credits
North Carolina - USGS 14-Digit HUCs
North Carolina County Boundaries
0 5 102.5
Miles
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
!.
Bank Parcel Location35.086417°, -77.401632°
Trent River
Neuse River
New River
White Oak River
LENOIRCOUNTY
CRAVENCOUNTY
JONESCOUNTY
DUPLINCOUNTY
ONSLOWCOUNTY CARTERETCOUNTY
CRAVENCOUNTY
CARTERETCOUNTY
PAMLICOCOUNTY
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance
Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
2³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:425,000
SERVICE AREAMAPNEUSE 04
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
Legend
!.Foy Farm Bank Parcel Location Pin
NC Major Rivers
North Carolina County Boundaries
Neuse River USGS 8-Digitl HUC 03020204, Service Area for Nutrient Offset Credits
0 10 205
Miles
FEB. 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 Finsh
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 2 Start
Feature 2
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
3³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:5,500
SITE MAP
2020 Aerial ImageryNC One Map
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
0 800 1,600400
Feet
Legend
Fee Simple Tracts
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.23 Acres
!(DWR Stream Determination - I/P Start Points
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
Open Water, Wetland, Forest, or Non-Ag. Areas
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
MARCH 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 Finsh
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 2 Start
Feature 2
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:5,500
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
0 800 1,600400
Feet
Legend
Fee Simple Tracts
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.23 Acres
!(DWR Stream Determination - I/P Start Points
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
MARCH 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
4
USGS MAP
2019Phillips Crossroads
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 Finsh
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 2 Start
Feature 2
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:5,500
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
0 800 1,600400
Feet
Legend
Fee Simple Tracts
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.23 Acres
!(DWR Stream Determination - I/P Start Points
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
MARCH 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
4
NRCS MAP
1981Jones County SoilManuscript (Map 4)
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 Finsh
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
Easement Maintenance AreaExisting Overhead Utility40 Foot Width (0.41 Acres)
Remove Existing Overhead Utiltiy Line From the Easement Area FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:5,500
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
0 800 1,600400
Feet
Legend
Fee Simple Tracts
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.23 Acres
Maintenance Area - No Credit: 0.41 Acres
Area to be Planted: 49.82 Acres
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
Open Water, Wetland, Forest, or Non-Ag. Areas (No Credit)
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
MARCH 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
6
RESTORATIONPLAN
2020 Aerial ImageryNC One Map
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 Finsh
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
Figure 7B
Figure 7A
Figure 7C
Easement Maintenance AreaExisting Overhead Utility40 Foot Width (0.41 Acres)
Remove Existing Overhead Utiltiy Line From the Easement Area
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:5,500
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
0 800 1,600400
Feet
MARCH 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
7
CREDIT AND MONITORING MAP
2020 Aerial ImageryNC One Map
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of
50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.
MONITORING NOTES:
Quantitative sampling will include thirty nine (39) permanent 10 x10-
meter vegetation plots, 2.03% of the Total Restoration Area (TRA).
TRA includes all planted areas within 200-feet from the TOB,
including non-credit areas i.e., diffuse flow, etc. Does not include
Easement Maintenance Areas.
1, 10 x10-meter vegetation plot = 1,076.39 sq. ft.
TRA = 2,067,478.0 sq. ft.
2% of TRA = 41,349.56 sq. ft. / 1,076.39 sq. ft. = 38.42
38.42 round-up to 39 vegetation plots accounting for 2.03% of the TRA.
Legend
Fee Simple Tracts
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.23 Acres
Maintenance ROW - No Credit: 0.41 Acres
Vegitation Survey Plots (39 Total)
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB)
TOB Offsets
TOB to 50 Feet
51 to 100 Feet
101 to 200 Feet
Foy Farm Credit Determination
Riparian Restoration, NOC (TOB - 200-Feet)
Diffuse Flow (DWR Memo 2008-019, No Credit)
Open Water, Wetland, Forest, or Non-Ag. Areas (No Credit)
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
!(
!(
!(
Feature 1 OriginFeature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 4b
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 1a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Easement Maintenance Area
Existing Overhead Utility
40 Foot Width (0.41 Acres)
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:2,500
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
0 400 800200
Feet
Legend
Fee Simple Tracts
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.23 Acres
Maintenance ROW - No Credit: 0.41 Acres
Vegitation Survey Plots (39 Total)
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB)
TOB Offsets
TOB to 50 Feet
51 to 100 Feet
101 to 200 Feet
Foy Farm Credit Determination
Riparian Restoration, NOC (TOB - 200-Feet)
Diffuse Flow (DWR Memo 2008-019, No Credit)
Open Water, Wetland, Forest, or Non-Ag. Areas (No Credit)
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
MARCH 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
7A
CREDIT AND MONITORING MAP
2020 Aerial ImageryNC One Map
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of
50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.
MONITORING NOTES:
Quantitative sampling will include thirty nine (39) permanent 10 x10-
meter vegetation plots, 2.03% of the Total Restoration Area (TRA).
TRA includes all planted areas within 200-feet from the TOB,
including non-credit areas i.e., diffuse flow, etc. Does not include
Easement Maintenance Areas.
1, 10 x10-meter vegetation plot = 1,076.39 sq. ft.
TRA = 2,067,478.0 sq. ft.
2% of TRA = 41,349.56 sq. ft. / 1,076.39 sq. ft. = 38.42
38.42 round-up to 39 vegetation plots accounting for 2.03% of the TRA.
!(
!(
!(
!(
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1a
Feature 7b
(non-credit generating)
Feature 4c (non-credit generating)
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5a
Feature 5bFeature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
Easement Maintenance AreaExisting Overhead Utility40 Foot Width (0.41 Acres)
Remove Existing Overhead Utiltiy Line From the Easement Area
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:2,500
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
0 200 400100
Feet
Legend
Fee Simple Tracts
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.23 Acres
Maintenance ROW - No Credit: 0.41 Acres
Vegitation Survey Plots (39Total)
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB)
TOB Offsets
TOB to 50 Feet
51 to 100 Feet
101 to 200 Feet
Foy Farm Credit Determination
Riparian Restoration, NOC (TOB - 200-Feet)
Diffuse Flow (DWR Memo 2008-019, No Credit)
Open Water, Wetland, Forest, or Non-Ag. Areas (No Credit)
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
MARCH 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
7B
CREDIT AND MONITORING MAP
2020 Aerial ImageryNC One Map
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of
50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.
MONITORING NOTES:
Quantitative sampling will include thirty nine (39) permanent 10 x10-
meter vegetation plots, 2.03% of the Total Restoration Area (TRA).
TRA includes all planted areas within 200-feet from the TOB,
including non-credit areas i.e., diffuse flow, etc. Does not include
Easement Maintenance Areas.
1, 10 x10-meter vegetation plot = 1,076.39 sq. ft.
TRA = 2,067,478.0 sq. ft.
2% of TRA = 41,349.56 sq. ft. / 1,076.39 sq. ft. = 38.42
38.42 round-up to 39 vegetation plots accounting for 2.03% of the TRA.
!(
!(!(
Feature 9
Feature 7b (non-credit generating)
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 4d
Feature 4b
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 1a
Feature 7
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:2,500
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
Legend
Fee Simple Tracts
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.23 Acres
Maintenance ROW - No Credit: 0.41 Acres
Vegitation Survey Plots (39 Total)
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB)
TOB Offsets
TOB to 50 Feet
51 to 100 Feet
101 to 200 Feet
Foy Farm Credit Determination
Riparian Restoration, NOC (TOB - 200-Feet)
Diffuse Flow (DWR Memo 2008-019, No Credit)
Open Water, Wetland, Forest, or Non-Ag. Areas (No Credit)
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
MARCH 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
7C
CREDIT AND MONITORING MAP
2020 Aerial ImageryNC One Map
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of
50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.
0 200 400100
Feet
MONITORING NOTES:
Quantitative sampling will include thirty nine (39) permanent 10 x10-
meter vegetation plots, 2.03% of the Total Restoration Area (TRA).
TRA includes all planted areas within 200-feet from the TOB,
including non-credit areas i.e., diffuse flow, etc. Does not include
Easement Maintenance Areas.
1, 10 x10-meter vegetation plot = 1,076.39 sq. ft.
TRA = 2,067,478.0 sq. ft.
2% of TRA = 41,349.56 sq. ft. / 1,076.39 sq. ft. = 38.42
38.42 round-up to 39 vegetation plots accounting for 2.03% of the TRA.
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Foy Farm
108 FOY LANE
Trenton, NC 28585
Inquiry Number:
March 31, 2022
6916586.5
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
2016 1"=750'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=750'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=750'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=750'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
1998 1"=750'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1998 USGS/DOQQ
1993 1"=750'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1993 USGS/DOQQ
1982 1"=750'Flight Date: March 09, 1982 USGS
1974 1"=750'Flight Date: April 01, 1974 USGS
1964 1"=750'Flight Date: April 01, 1964 USGS
1961 1"=750'Flight Date: September 22, 1961 USGS
1956 1"=750'Flight Date: April 09, 1956 USGS
1950 1"=750'Flight Date: November 21, 1950 USGS
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 03/31/22
Foy Farm
Site Name:Client Name:
Restoration Systems, LLC
108 FOY LANE 1101 Haynes Street
Trenton, NC 28585 Raleigh, NC 27604
EDR Inquiry #6916586.5 Contact:JD Hamby
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
6916586 5-page 2
6916586.5
2016
= 750'
6916586.5
2012
= 750'
6916586.5
2009
= 750'
6916586.5
2006
= 750'
6916586.5
1998
= 750'
6916586.5
1993
= 750'
6916586.5
1982
= 750'
6916586.5
1974
= 750'
6916586.5
1964
= 750'
6916586.5
1961
= 750'
6916586.5
1956
= 750'
6916586.5
1950
= 750'
Foy Farm Bank Parcel –Neuse 04; Jones County Photo Date: 01/25/2023
Image 1: Looking west, Features 3a, 1a and 1b
1
Image 2: Looking east, Features 1a,6a,6b,and 4d
Feature 1b
Feature 8b
Feature 4d
Feature 1a,
in-line pond
Feature 1a
Feature 6a
Feature 3a
Foy Farm Bank Parcel –Neuse 04; Jones County Photo Date: 01/25/2023
Image 3: Looking east, Features 3a & 3b
2
Image 4: Looking west, Features 3a, 3b, and 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3b
Feature 3a
Feature 1b
Foy Farm Bank Parcel –Neuse 04; Jones County Photo Date: 01/25/2023
Image 5: Looking east, Feature 5a
3
Image 6: Looking east, Feature 8b
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 8b startFeature 8b
Foy Farm Bank Parcel –Neuse 04; Jones County Photo Date: 01/25/2023
Image 7: Looking west, Features 4, 6a, and 8b
4
Image 8: Looking west, Features 5a, 6a, 6b, 1a and 4d
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 6a
Feature 4
Feature 8b
Feature 4d
Feature 1a
Feature 5a

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1366v2) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Appendix B – DWR Communication

April 16, 2021 (replaces letter dated March 30, 2021)

Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )

Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset – Foy Farm Site
Near 35.08650466, -77.400175761
Neuse 03020204
Jones County

Dear Mr. Jenkins ,

On September 15, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems , LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above -
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 0302020 4. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled “Foy
Farms DWR Viability/Determination Map (Figure 1) prepared by RS. On December 9, 2021, Ms.
Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.

Ms. Merritt’s evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200’ from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
Foy Farm Sit e
Restoration Systems, LLC
April 16, 2021 (revised letter dated March 30, 2021)
Page 2 of 5

Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
1a Stream

Yes Non-forested agricultural
fields with mature forest
below outfall of pond
2Yes

Yes (fields
only)

Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

1a Pond in-line Pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields
Yes
*see note
Yes

Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
The dam needs to have controlled access
by RS & should be deeded along with the
easement so that dam integrity is
maintained, or secure its connection to
include the stream below.
1b Ditch
>3’ depth

No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No Yes

Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
1
(located
above ditch
1b)
Pond No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No No

hydrologically connected to a ditch (1b)
2 in-line pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields
No
*see note
No
*see note

Note: Conservation easement is shown to
include only the upper segment of the
pond and does not include controlled
access of the outlet connecting the pond to
the stream. The entire pond must be
within the conservation easement and
extend to the culvert crossing/outlet such that the pond maintains its “in-line pond
status”. This pond is not viable for credit
without its connection to feature 4 secured.

If able to comply with requirements, then
it will qualify as a Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)

3a/origin Stream w/ in-
line pond
Yes, but
pond
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields

Yes Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(3)

no dam was identified in the field
3b Ditch
>3’ depth

No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
74a/start Stream w/ in-
line pond
Yes Non-forested maintained
lawn
Yes No

Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
Foy Farm Site
Restoration Systems, LLC April 16, 2021 (revised letter dated March 30, 2021)
Page 3 of 5
Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature (0-200’)
Buffer
Credit Viable
3Nutrient
Offset Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
4b
starts below
pond and
ends at 4d
Stream within
an old
impoundment
Yes innermost riparian areas are
not forested & not in
agriculture. Adjacent fields
are in agriculture. Top of
banks include some
forested areas.

2Yes Yes
(adjacent
fields only)
Non-forested areas - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

4c wetland No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No No N/A
74d
see map
Stream Yes Combination of forested
and non-forested areas.
Not in agriculture. Most of
this reach is within an
active floodplain with
inundated soils.
2Yes
(see
note)
Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

Note: Most of the riparian areas along 4d
are inundated and within an active
floodplain making it highly difficult to
establish woody vegetation (trees). It is
likely that vegetation planted along this
reach will be at high risk of low
performance.

5a In-line pond Yes Left Bank – non-forested
maintained lawn
Right Bank – non-forested
agriculture
Yes Yes (right
bank only)
Right Bank/Non-forested ag fields -
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
Left Bank/Maintained Lawn - Restoration
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

5b Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural fields with areas of mature
forest
2Yes Yes (fields only) Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
Note: No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W

6a Stream No Mostly mature forest with
non-forested agricultural
fields adjacent to the
woodline
2Yes Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
Foy Farm Sit e
Restoration Systems, LLC
April 16, 2021 (revised letter dated March 30, 2021)
Page 4 of 5
1Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated March 18, 2021 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the tot al area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area. 6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7DWR assessed the feature during the site visit when the original conservation easement boundary included the feature; therefore, the
land use description & mitigation determination is being included.

Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. A map representing the proposal for the site is attached
to this letter and is initialed by Ms. Merritt on March 30, 2021. Substantial changes to the proposed
Feature Classification onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
6b Ditch

No non-forested agriculture
fields with a narrow fringe
of forested areas
*see
Note
Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8)

Forested areas – no credit

*Buffer Mitigation – Assessment concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More information on the watershed is needed for complete assessment. See rule
7a/origin

Stream within
an old
impoundment
Yes innermost riparian areas are
not forested & not in
agriculture. Adjacent fields
are in agriculture
Yes Yes
(adjacent
fields only)
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
77b Wetland No non-forested No No N/A
78a Stream Yes mature forest 2Yes No Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

8b In-line pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields (with a single family residence & yard)
Yes
*see note
Yes Non-forested agriculture fields only -
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)

Notes: The dam needs to have controlled
access by RS & should be deeded along
with the easement so that dam integrity is maintained, or secure its connection to
feature 8b.
No credits are allowed within the DOT
R.O.W or private yard
9 No
determination
performed
N/A Mostly mature forest
adjacent to agricultural
fields
N/A N/A N/A

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
Foy Farm Site
Restoration Systems, LLC April 16, 2021 (revised letter dated March 30, 2021)
Page 5 of 5
easement boundary could affect the Site’s potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Where riparian areas adjacent to in -line ponds are fully or partially proposed for buffer mitigation or
nutrient offset credit, the entire pond must be protected with a permanent conservation easement and
its outfall controlled by RS to be viable to generate buffer or nutrient offset mitigation credits.
Otherwise, additional measures as determined by DWR will be required to be viable to generate
mitigation credits.

This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to D WR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.

All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

This viability assessment will expire on March 30, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, st ream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site .

P lease contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,

Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: “Foy Farms DWR Viability/Determination Map”

cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
Fea ture 1 Sta rt
Fea ture 1 Origin
Fea ture 1 Finish
Fea ture 1b
Fea ture 1a Fea ture 9
Fea ture 7 Sta rt
Fea ture 7 Origin
Fea ture 7 Finsh
Fea ture 4d
Fea ture 4c
Fea ture 4b
Fea ture 4a
Fea ture 4 Sta rt
Fea ture 4 Finsh
Fea ture 6 Finsh
Fea ture 6 Origin
Fea ture 6 Sta rt
Fea ture 6b
Fea ture 6a
Fea ture 8 Sta rt
Fea ture 8b
Fea ture 8a
Fea ture 8 Finsh
Fea ture 5 Sta rt
Fea ture 5 Finsh
Fea ture 5a
Fea ture 5b
Fea ture 2 Sta rt
Fea ture 2 Finsh
Fea ture 2
Fea ture 3 Finsh
Fea ture 1a
Fea ture 3a
Fea ture 3b
Fea ture 3 Origin
Fea ture 3 Sta rt Legend
Ba nk Pa rc el Fee Sim p le Tra c t
Foy Fa rm - Post DW R Via b ility Visit: Prop osed Ea sem ent(12-2020) +/- 76 Ac res
!(DW R Via b ility Pins - Fea ture Brea k Points (for id entific a tion)
!(DW R Strea m Determ ina tion Pins
Site Features
Ma n-Ma d e Ditc h
I/P Strea m , or I/P through In-Line Pond
In-Line Pond
W etla nd
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYN ES ST, SUITE 211RALEIGH, N C 27604PHON E : 919.755.9490FAX : [phone]
SCALE:
DATE: 03 - 2021
Coord ina te System :N AD_1983_SP_N C_FIPS_3200_Ft.
Aeria l Im a gery: (c) servic es.nconem a p .gov - 2019
SITE: N euse04
Foy FarmsDWR Viability/Determination Map2019 Imagery³1 in = 375 feet
0 340 680 1,020 1,360170
Feet
This m a p a nd a ll d a ta c onta ined within a re sup p lied a s is with no wa rra nty. Restora tion System s, LLC exp ressly d isc la im s resp onsib ility for d a m a ges or lia b ility from a ny c la im s tha t m a y a rise out of the use or m isuse of this m a p . It is the sole resp onsibility of the user to d eterm ine if the d a ta on this m a p is c om p a tible with the user’s need s. This m a p wa s not c rea ted a s survey d a ta , nor should it b e used a s suc h. It is the user’s resp onsibility to obt a in p rop er survey d a ta , p rep a red b y a lic ensed surveyor, where required b y la w.
Feature 7b
3/30/2021
DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40

March 30, 2021

Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )

Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset – Foy Farm Site
Near 35.08650466, -77.400175761
Neuse 03020204
Jones County

Dear Mr. Jenkins,

On September 15, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020204. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled “Foy
Farms DWR Viability/Determination Map (Figure 1) prepared by RS. On December 9, 2021, Ms.
Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.

Ms. Merritt’s evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200’ from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
1a Stream & in -
line pond
Yes Non-forested agricultural
fields with mature forest
below outfall
2Yes Yes (fields
only)

Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

1b Ditch
>3’ depth

No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No Yes

Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A
Foy Farm Sit e
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 30, 2021
Page 2 of 5
Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
2 in-line pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields
No
*see note
No
*see note

Note: Conservation easement is shown to
include only the upper segment of the
pond and does not include controlled
access of the outlet connecting the pond to
the stream. The entire pond must be
within the conservation easement and
extend to the culvert crossing/outlet such
that the pond maintains its “in-line pond
status”. This pond is not viable for credit
without its connection to feature 4 secured.

If able to comply with requirements, then
it will qualify as a Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)

3a in-line pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields

Yes Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(3)

3b Ditch
>3’ depth

No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
74a Stream & in -
line pond
Yes Non-forested maintained
lawn
Yes No

Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
4b
starts below
pond and
ends at 4d
Stream within
an old
impoundment
Yes innermost riparian areas are
not forested & not in
agriculture. Adjacent fields
are in agriculture. Top of
banks include some
forested areas.

2Yes Yes
(adjacent
fields only)
Non-forested areas - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

4c wetland No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No No N/A
74d
see map
Stream Yes Combination of forested
and non-forested areas.
Not in agriculture. Most of
this reach is within an
active floodplain with
inundated soils.
2Yes
(see
note)
No Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

Note: Most of the riparian areas along 4d
are inundated and within an active
floodplain making it highly difficult to
establish woody vegetation (trees). It is
likely that vegetation planted along this
reach will be at high risk of low
performance.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A
Foy Farm Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 30, 2021
Page 3 of 5
Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
5a In-line pond Yes Left Bank – non-forested
maintained lawn
Right Bank – non-forested
agriculture
Yes Yes (right
bank only)
Right Bank/Non-forested ag fields -
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)

Left Bank/Maintained Lawn - Restoration
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

5b Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural
fields with areas of mature
forest
2Yes Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

Note: No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W

6a Stream No Mostly mature forest with
non-forested agricultural
fields adjacent to the
woodline
2Yes Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)

6b Ditch

No non-forested agriculture
fields with a narrow fringe
of forested areas
*see
Note
Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8)

Forested areas – no credit

*Buffer Mitigation – Assessment concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More information on the watershed is needed for complete assessment. See rule

7a

Stream within
an old
impoundment
Yes innermost riparian areas are
not forested & not in
agriculture. Adjacent fields
are in agriculture
Yes Yes
(adjacent
fields only)
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
77b Wetland No non-forested No No N/A
78a Stream Yes mature forest 2Yes No Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(5)

8b In-line pond
(stream starts
above pond)
Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields (with a single family
residence & yard)
Yes

Yes Non-forested agriculture fields only -
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(3)

Notes:
No credits are allowed within the DOT
R.O.W or private yard

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A
Foy Farm Sit e
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 30, 2021
Page 4 of 5
1Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated March 18, 2021 (ID# 2020-1366) using the
1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by
the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7DWR assessed the feature during the site visit when the original conservation easement boundary included the feature; therefore, the
land use description & mitigation determination is being included.

Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. A map representing the proposal for the site is attached
to this letter and is initialed by Ms. Merritt on March 30, 2021. Substantial changes to the proposed
easement boundary could affect the Site’s potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Where riparian areas adjacent to in-line ponds are fully or partially proposed for buffer mitigation or
nutrient offset credit, the entire pond must be protected with a permanent conservation easement and
its outfall controlled by RS to be viable to generate buffer or nutrient offset mitigation credits.
Otherwise, additional measures as determined by DWR will be required to be viable to generate
mitigation credits.

This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.

All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

This viability assessment will expire on March 30, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.

Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
9 No
determination
performed
N/A Mostly mature forest
adjacent to agricultural
fields
N/A N/A N/A

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A
Foy Farm Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 30, 2021
Page 5 of 5

Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,

Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: “Foy Farms DWR Viability/Determination Map”

cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
Fea ture 1 Sta rt
Fea ture 1 Origin
Fea ture 1 Finish
Fea ture 1b
Fea ture 1a Fea ture 9
Fea ture 7 Sta rt
Fea ture 7 Origin
Fea ture 7 Finsh
Fea ture 4d
Fea ture 4c
Fea ture 4b
Fea ture 4a
Fea ture 4 Sta rt
Fea ture 4 Finsh
Fea ture 6 Finsh
Fea ture 6 Origin
Fea ture 6 Sta rt
Fea ture 6b
Fea ture 6a
Fea ture 8 Sta rt
Fea ture 8b
Fea ture 8a
Fea ture 8 Finsh
Fea ture 5 Sta rt
Fea ture 5 Finsh
Fea ture 5a
Fea ture 5b
Fea ture 2 Sta rt
Fea ture 2 Finsh
Fea ture 2
Fea ture 3 Finsh
Fea ture 1a
Fea ture 3a
Fea ture 3b
Fea ture 3 Origin
Fea ture 3 Sta rt Legend
Ba nk Pa rc el Fee Sim p le Tra c t
Foy Fa rm - Post DW R Via b ility Visit: Prop osed Ea sem ent(12-2020) +/- 76 Ac res
!(DW R Via b ility Pins - Fea ture Brea k Points (for id entific a tion)
!(DW R Strea m Determ ina tion Pins
Site Features
Ma n-Ma d e Ditc h
I/P Strea m , or I/P through In-Line Pond
In-Line Pond
W etla nd
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYN ES ST, SUITE 211RALEIGH, N C 27604PHON E : 919.755.9490FAX : [phone]
SCALE:
DATE: 03 - 2021
Coord ina te System :N AD_1983_SP_N C_FIPS_3200_Ft.
Aeria l Im a gery: (c) servic es.nconem a p .gov - 2019
SITE: N euse04
Foy FarmsDWR Viability/Determination Map2019 Imagery³1 in = 375 feet
0 340 680 1,020 1,360170
Feet
This m a p a nd a ll d a ta c onta ined within a re sup p lied a s is with no wa rra nty. Restora tion System s, LLC exp ressly d isc la im s resp onsib ility for d a m a ges or lia b ility from a ny c la im s tha t m a y a rise out of the use or m isuse of this m a p . It is the sole resp onsibility of the user to d eterm ine if the d a ta on this m a p is c om p a tible with the user’s need s. This m a p wa s not c rea ted a s survey d a ta , nor should it b e used a s suc h. It is the user’s resp onsibility to obt a in p rop er survey d a ta , p rep a red b y a lic ensed surveyor, where required b y la w.
Feature 7b
3/30/2021
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A

March 18, 2021

Thelma Grace Foy
ATTN: Randy Foy
216 Foy Lane
Trenton, North Carolina 28585

2020-1366 v1
Jones County
Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714)

Subject Property/ Project Name: Foy Farm Nutrient Mitigation Site (Jones Co. PIN 447980516300)
Address/Location: Middle Road and Foy Lane, Trenton, North Carolina
Stream(s) Evaluated: (8) – UT to Trent River, Class C, Sw, NSW; Stream Index 27-101-(1); Neuse River Basin
Determination Date: December 09, 2020 Staff: Chris Pullinger, Katie Merritt, Ernest Hahn
Determination Type:
Buffer: Stream:
Neuse (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
Tar-Pamlico (15A NCAC 02B .0734)
Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0614)
Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267) (governmental and/or
interjurisdictional projects)
Randleman (15A NCAC 02B .0724)
Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B .0605-.0608)
Intermittent/Perennial Determination

*E/I/P = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial

The Division of Water Resources has determined that the streams listed in the table above and included on the attached map have been
located on page 4 of the most recent published (1981) NRCS Soil Survey of Jones County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the
Phillips Crossroads USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale and evaluated for applicability to the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rule. Each feature
that is checked “Not Subject” and highlighted on the attached maps in “red” has been determined to be either man-made in nature,
ephemeral, or not present on the property. Features that are checked “Subject” and highlighted on the attached maps in “blue” have been
located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. There may be other streams or
features located on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US
Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.

This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a
determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar
days of date of this letter to the Director in writing.
Stream E/I/P* Not
Subject
Subject Start@ Stop@ Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
2020-1366 v1 1 man-made ditch X 2020-1366 v1 1 Start 2020-1366 v1 1 Origin X
2020-1366 v1 1 I X 2020-1366 v1 1 Origin 2020-1366 v1 1 Finish X X
2020-1366 v1 2 P (in-line pond) X 2020-1366 v1 2 Start 2020-1366 v1 2 Finish X
2020-1366 v1 3 man-made ditch X 2020-1366 v1 3 Start 2020-1366 v1 3 Origin
2020-1366 v1 3 P X 2020-1366 v1 3 Origin 2020-1366 v1 3 Finish X X
2020-1366 v1 4 I X 2020-1366 v1 4 Start 2020-1366 v1 4 Finish X
2020-1366 v1 5 I X 2020-1366 v1 5 Start 2020-1366 v1 5 Finish X
2020-1366 v1 6 man-made ditch X 2020-1366 v1 6 Start 2020-1366 v1 Origin
2020-1366 v1 6 Unmapped (I) X 2020-1366 v1 6 Origin 2020-1366 v1 6 Finish
2020-1366 v1 7 wetland X 2020-1366 v1 7 Start 2020-1366 v1 7 Origin X X
2020-1366 v1 7 I X 2020-1366 v1 7 Origin 2020-1366 v1 7 Finish X X
2020-1366 v1 8 I X 2020-1366 v1 8 Start 2020-1366 v1 8 Finish X X

If sending via US Postal Service:
c/o Paul Wojoski
DWR – 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
c/o Paul Wojoski
DWR – 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604

This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60) days.

This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers or
waters. The project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries regarding applicability to the
Clean Water Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office at (910)-251-4629.

If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Chris Pullinger at [phone].

Sincerely,

Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ

cc: WaRO DWR File Copy/LASERFICHE
Barrett Jenkins, Restoration Systems (via e-mail: [e-mail])
Raymond Holz, Restoration Systems (via e-mail [e-mail])
Katie Merritt, DWR Central Office (via e-mail: [e-mail])
Emily Thompson, USACE Washington Field Regulatory Office (via e-mail)

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1366v2) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Appendix C – USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report

United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Jones County,
North Carolina
Foy Farm Soil Report
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
July 13, 2022
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11
Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Jones County, North Carolina.........................................................................13
AnB—Alpin fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes...............................................13
ExA—Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes............................14
Gr—Grantham loam....................................................................................15
La—Leaf silt loam........................................................................................16
Ln—Leon sand............................................................................................18
MaC—Marvyn loamy sand, 6 to 15 percent slopes.....................................19
Mk—Muckalee loam....................................................................................20
Na—Nahunta loam......................................................................................21
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes........................................22
W—Water....................................................................................................24
References............................................................................................................25
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
38
8
4
6
0
0
38
8
4
8
0
0
38
8
5
0
0
0
38
8
5
2
0
0
38
8
5
4
0
0
38
8
5
6
0
0
38
8
5
8
0
0
38
8
4
6
0
0
38
8
4
8
0
0
38
8
5
0
0
0
38
8
5
2
0
0
38
8
5
4
0
0
38
8
5
6
0
0
280200 280400 280600 280800 281000 281200 281400 281600 281800 282000
280200 280400 280600 280800 281000 281200 281400 281600 281800 282000
35° 5' 28'' N
77
°

2
4
'

4
0
'
'

W
35° 5' 28'' N
77
°

2
3
'

2
4
'
'

W
35° 4' 48'' N
77
°

2
4
'

4
0
'
'

W
35° 4' 48'' N
77
°

2
3
'

2
4
'
'

W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 400 800 1600 2400
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Meters
Map Scale: 1:8,780 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Jones County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 27, Jan 21, 2022
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 1, 2020—Nov 21,
2020
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
AnB Alpin fine sand, 0 to 6 percent
slopes
3.5 4.7%
ExA Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to
2 percent slopes
20.1 27.2%
Gr Grantham loam 0.0 0.0%
La Leaf silt loam 10.5 14.3%
Ln Leon sand 4.2 5.7%
MaC Marvyn loamy sand, 6 to 15
percent slopes
0.0 0.0%
Mk Muckalee loam 5.9 7.9%
Na Nahunta loam 7.2 9.8%
NoB Norfolk loamy sand, 1 to 4
percent slopes
11.5 15.5%
W Water 11.0 14.8%
Totals for Area of Interest 73.9 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
Jones County, North Carolina
AnB—Alpin fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wnm
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Alpin and similar soils:85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Alpin
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: fine sand
E - 7 to 38 inches: fine sand
E/Bt - 38 to 72 inches: fine sand
C - 72 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:Rare
Frequency of ponding:None
Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
ExA—Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wnt
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Exum and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Exum
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: very fine sandy loam
E - 8 to 12 inches: silt loam
Bt - 12 to 70 inches: clay loam
C - 70 to 100 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
Gr—Grantham loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wnw
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Grantham, drained, and similar soils:80 percent
Grantham, undrained, and similar soils:10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Grantham, Drained
Setting
Landform:Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave, linear
Parent material:Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 14 inches: loam
Eg - 14 to 17 inches: loam
Btg - 17 to 72 inches: loam
Cg - 72 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
Description of Grantham, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave, linear
Parent material:Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 14 inches: loam
Eg - 14 to 17 inches: loam
Btg - 17 to 72 inches: loam
Cg - 72 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
La—Leaf silt loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wp2
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Leaf, drained, and similar soils:80 percent
Leaf, undrained, and similar soils:10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
Description of Leaf, Drained
Setting
Landform:Flats on broad interstream divides, terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: silt loam
Btg - 6 to 67 inches: clay
Cg - 67 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very high (about 12.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Leaf, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Flats on broad interstream divides, terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: silt loam
Btg - 6 to 67 inches: clay
Cg - 67 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very high (about 12.0 inches)
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ln—Leon sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wp4
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance
Map Unit Composition
Leon and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Leon
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: sand
E - 3 to 15 inches: sand
Bh - 15 to 30 inches: fine sand
BE - 30 to 33 inches: fine sand
E' - 33 to 66 inches: fine sand
B'h - 66 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Custom Soil Resource Report
18
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
MaC—Marvyn loamy sand, 6 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wp6
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Marvyn and similar soils:80 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Marvyn
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Shoulder, backslope
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy and clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 4 inches: loamy fine sand
E - 4 to 12 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt - 12 to 45 inches: sandy clay loam
Cg - 45 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:6 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
19
Minor Components
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Mk—Muckalee loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wp8
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Muckalee, undrained, and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Muckalee, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 24 inches: loam
Cg - 24 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Custom Soil Resource Report
20
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Na—Nahunta loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wpb
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Nahunta, drained, and similar soils:80 percent
Nahunta, undrained, and similar soils:10 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Nahunta, Drained
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loam
Btg - 6 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 12 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Nahunta, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Custom Soil Resource Report
21
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loam
Btg - 6 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 12 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Grantham, undrained
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave, linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wpc
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:4 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Custom Soil Resource Report
22
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 14 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt - 14 to 56 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 56 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Woodington, undrained
Percent of map unit:3 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:1 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
23
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water:100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
24
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
25
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
26

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1366v2) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Appendix D – NHP & FWS Reports

NCNHDE-17575
March 31, 2022
Alexander Baldwin
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Foy Farm Nutrient Bank
Dear Alexander Baldwin:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally-
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Foy Farm Nutrient Bank
March 31, 2022
NCNHDE-17575
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Amphibian 16564 Necturus lewisi Neuse River Waterdog 2019-03-01 AB 3-Medium Threatened Special
Concern
G2 S2
Crustacean 10767 Orconectes
carolinensis
North Carolina Spiny
Crayfish
2019-02-28 E 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
G3 S3
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33357 Stylurus ivae Shining Clubtail 1990-09-16 H?3-Medium ---Significantly
Rare
G4 S1?
Freshwater Fish 4620 Lampetra aepyptera Least Brook Lamprey 1991-Pre H?3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S2
Freshwater Fish 32577 Notropis volucellus Mimic Shiner 1986-09-04 H 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S2
Freshwater Fish 8675 Noturus furiosus Carolina Madtom 1986-08-16 H 3-Medium Endangered Threatened G2 S2
Vascular Plant 26301 Carex emmonsii Emmons's Sedge 1958-04-19 H 4-Low ---Significantly
Rare Other
G5T5 S2
Vascular Plant 27189 Solidago verna Spring-flowering
Goldenrod
2007-06-Pre CD 3-Medium ---Threatened G3 S3
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
NEU/Trent River Aquatic Habitat R3 (High)C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program
Easement
NC Department of Agriculture, Division of
Soil and Water Conservation
State
Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program
Easement
NC Department of Agriculture, Division of
Soil and Water Conservation
State
USFWS Critical Habitat - Carolina Madtom US Fish and Wildlife Service Federal
USFWS Critical Habitat - Neuse River Waterdog US Fish and Wildlife Service Federal
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on March 31, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3
July 21, 2022
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0026629
Project Name: Foy Farm Nutrient Bank

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area 
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species.  If suitable habitat is present, surveys 
should be conducted to determine the species’ presence or absence within the project area.  The 
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.  
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
07/21/2022   2

species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project-related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.
07/21/2022   3

▪
▪
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
Official Species List
Migratory Birds
07/21/2022   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]
07/21/2022   2

Project Summary
Project Code:2022-0026629
Event Code:None
Project Name:Foy Farm Nutrient Bank
Project Type:Mitigation Development/Review - Mitigation or Conservation Bank
Project Description:Restore stream, ditch, and pond riparian buffers by planting hardwood
trees within a 200-foot width along both sides of features.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.08636775,-77.40085380107237,14z
Counties:Jones County, North Carolina
07/21/2022   3

1.
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Threatened
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Threatened
1
07/21/2022   4

Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Endangered
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
07/21/2022   1

1.
2.
3.
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug
31
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul
31
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul
31
1
2
07/21/2022   2

1.
2.
3.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to
Sep 10
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to
Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ()
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort ()
07/21/2022   3

▪
▪
▪
 no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel
BCC - BCR
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
07/21/2022   4

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
07/21/2022   5

1.
2.
3.
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
"Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
07/21/2022   6

certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
07/21/2022   7

IPaC User Contact Information
Agency:Restoration Systems, LLC
Name:Alexander Baldwin
Address:1101 Haynes Street
Address Line 2:Suite 211
City:Raleigh
State:NC
Zip:27604
Email [e-mail]
Phone:[phone]

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1366v2) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Appendix E – EDR Report

FORM-LBD-RG
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Foy Farm
108 FOY LANE
Trenton, NC 28585
Inquiry Number: 6916586.2s
March 28, 2022
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 16
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-10
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-12
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC6916586.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6916586.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
108 FOY LANE
TRENTON, NC 28585
COORDINATES
35.0816580 - 35ˆ 4’ 53.96’’Latitude (North):
77.4039040 - 77ˆ 24’ 14.05’’Longitude (West):
Zone 18Universal Tranverse Mercator:
280830.8UTM X (Meters):
3884544.2UTM Y (Meters):
41 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
13720790 PHILLIPS CROSSROADS, NCTarget Property Map:
2019Version Date:
13720824 TRENTON, NCEast Map:
2019Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20140706Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
6916586.2s Page 2
B5 THELMA GRACE FOY FAR 946 NOBLES LOOP RD LAST Lower 1 ft.
4 216 FOY LANE ERNS Lower 1 ft.
B3 THELMA GRACE FOY FAR 946 NOBLES LOOP RD SPILLS 90 Lower 1 ft.
A2 FOY FARM (THELMA) 108 FOY LANE LUST TP
A1 FOY FARM (THELMA) 108 FOY LANE RGA LUST TP
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
108 FOY LANE
TRENTON, NC 28585
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6916586.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this
property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report:
EPA IDDatabase(s)Site
FOY FARM (THELMA)
108 FOY LANE
TRENTON, NC
N/ARGA LUST
Facility ID: 38144
FOY FARM (THELMA)
108 FOY LANE
TRENTON, NC 28585
N/ALUST
Incident Phase: CO
Incident Number: 38144
Current Status: File Located in Archives
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6916586.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6916586.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6916586.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP Animal Operation Permits Listing
PCSRP Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6916586.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: The Emergency Response Notification System records and stores information on reported
releases of oil and hazardous substances. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA.
A review of the ERNS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2021 has revealed that there is 1 ERNS
site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
Not reported 216 FOY LANE 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 4 10
NRC Report #: 941034
Incident Date Time: 2010-05-20 15:30:00
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST: A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
A review of the LAST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/08/2021 has revealed that there is 1 LAST
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
THELMA GRACE FOY FAR 946 NOBLES LOOP RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B5 14
Close Out: 08/31/2010
Incident Number: 93068
Current Status: A
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Records of Emergency Release Reports
SPILLS 90: Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch
databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990.
Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
A review of the SPILLS 90 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/27/2012 has revealed that there is 1
SPILLS 90 site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
THELMA GRACE FOY FAR 946 NOBLES LOOP RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B3 9
Status: CURRENT RECORD
Site Id: 93068
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6916586.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
4 040
4
0
40
4
0
40
4 0
4
0
40
40
4040 4
04
0
40404
0
40
4
0
40
4 0
40 40
4 040
40 4
0 4
0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4
0
40
4
04
0
40
4 0 4 0
4
0
4
0 4 0
4 0 40 40404040
40 40
40 40
40
4
0
40
4 0 4
0 4
0
4 0
4040
4
0
4 0
4 0
40
40
4
0404
0
4
0 40
4
040
4040 40404040
40
40 4 0 40 40
4
0
40
40
4
0 4040
4
0
4
0
4040
40
4 040
4
040
4 0
4 0
40
4
0 4 0
4 0
4 0
40
40
4 0
4 0
4
0
4 0
4
0
4
0
4 0
40
4 0
4 04
0
4
04
0
4 0
4
0
4 0
4 0
4 0
40
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
4
0
4
0
4
0
40
40
4
0
40 40
4
0
4
0
4
0
4
0
4
0
40
4 0
4
0
40 40
4
0
40
40
4 0
4 0
40
4
0
4
0
4
0
40
40
4
040
4
0
40
40
40
40
40
4
0 40 40
4
0
4 0
40
4
0
40
4
0
40
40
40
40
40
4
0
40
40
4
0 40
4
0
4 0
4 0
40
40
40
40
4 0
40
4 0 4
0 4040
40
4
0
40
40
40 40 40
4 0 40
40
40
40
40
40
40
4 0
40
4
0
40
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS
Federal ERNS list
1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.001ERNS
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
TC6916586.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LCID
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
1 NR NR 0 0 1 0.500LAST
1 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 1LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPFAS
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS
TC6916586.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IMD
1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.001SPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001AIRS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ASBESTOS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001AOP
TC6916586.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PCSRP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CCB
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SEPT HAULERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MINES MRDS
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA HWS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF
1 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001 1RGA LUST
5 0 0 0 0 3 2- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6916586.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
2010 FOY FARM (THELMA) 108 FOY LANE
2011 FOY FARM (THELMA) 108 FOY LANE
2012 FOY FARM (THELMA) 108 FOY LANE
RGA LUST:
Site 1 of 2 in cluster A
Actual:
41 ft.

Property TRENTON, NC
Target 108 FOY LANE N/A
A1 RGA LUSTFOY FARM (THELMA)S115619192
Not reported5 Min Quad:
2524485581Telephone:
Not reportedCompany:
RMBRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
TrueRPOP:
TrueRPOW:
0Reel Num:
512CD Num:
TrueRPL:
4PETOPT:
G1RBCA GW:
ACurrent Status:
9GPS Confirmed:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
0Flag1:
0Flag:
NMTBE1:
0MTBE:
RESLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
LRisk Classification:
NCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
S3Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
11/15/2010Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
10/13/2010Date Reported:
3Source Type:
38144Incident Number:
WA-26972UST Number:
Not reportedFacility ID:
TRENTON, NC 28585City,State,Zip:
108 FOY LANEAddress:
FOY FARM (THELMA)Name:
LUST:
Site 2 of 2 in cluster A
Actual:
41 ft.

Property TRENTON, NC 28585
Target 108 FOY LANE N/A
A2 LUSTFOY FARM (THELMA)S110630149
TC6916586.2s Page 8
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
COIncident Phase:
11/15/2010Last Modified:
38144Incident Number:
LUST:
PUST Number:
ASource:
3Cause:
2Err Type:
Not reportedSource Code:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Minute Quad:
Y7#5 Minute Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
NWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
7Location:
4Type:
3Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
10/13/2010Date Reported:
8/3/2010Date Occurred:
38144Facility Id:
WA-26972UST Number:
Not reportedERR Type:
LUST:
FOY FARM (THELMA) (Continued)S110630149
34Elevation:
35087110Latitude:
-77388515Longitude:
JONESCounty:
Not reportedCross Street:
WA-88878Secondary ID:
93068Site ID:
Not reportedContact Phone:
Not reportedContact Name:
CURRENT RECORDStatus:
Spills:
Site 1 of 2 in cluster B
1 ft.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
40 ft.

< 1/8 TRENTON, NC 28585
946 NOBLES LOOP RD N/A
B3 SPILLS 90THELMA GRACE FOY FARM S112338364
TC6916586.2s Page 9
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
UDOT Regulated:
Not reportedPipeline Type:
UNPDES Compliance:
Not reportedNPDES:
Not reportedType of Fuel:
Not reportedGenerating Capacity:
NPower Generating Facility:
OTHERType of Fixed Object:
Not reportedBuilding ID:
Not reportedRoad Mile Marker:
Not reportedAircraft Runway Number:
Not reportedAircraft Hanger:
Not reportedAircraft Spot Number:
Not reportedAircraft Fuel on Board Units:
Not reportedAircraft Fuel on Board:
Not reportedAircraft Fuel Capacity Units:
Not reportedAircraft Fuel Capacity:
Not reportedAircraft ID:
Not reportedAircraft Model:
Not reportedAircraft Type:
941034NRC Report #:
Incidents:
NPotential Range:
Not reportedLocation range:
Not reportedLocation Township:
Not reportedLocation Section:
Not reportedLong Quad:
Not reportedLong Sec:
Not reportedLong Min:
Not reportedLong Deg:
Not reportedLat Quad:
Not reportedLat Sec:
Not reportedLat Min:
Not reportedLat Deg:
Not reportedDirection From City:
Not reportedDistance Units:
Not reportedDistance From City:
Not reportedLocation Zip:
JONESLocation County:
NCLocation State:
TRENTONLocation Nearest City:
Not reportedLocation Street 2:
Not reportedLocation Street 1:
216 FOY LANELoaction Address:
FARM FIELD// NEAR NEAR THE TRENT RIVERIncident Location:
DISCOVEREDIncident DTG:
2010-05-20 15:30:00Incident Date Time:
DUMPINGIncident Cause:
FIXEDType of Incident:
FT LONG, 50 FT WIDE, AND 10 FEET DEEP.
NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY.THE CONTAMINATED SOIL IMPACTS AN AREA 400
CALLER REPORTED THAT SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH OIL WAS DISCOVERED BY THEDescription of Incident:
941034NRC Report #:
Incident Commons:
1 ft.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
39 ft.

< 1/8 TRENTON, NC
216 FOY LANE N/A
4 ERNS 2010941034
TC6916586.2s Page 10
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedSignalman Testing:
Not reportedTrain Dispatcher Testing:
Not reportedBrakeman Testing:
Not reportedRCL Operator Testing:
Not reportedYard Foreman Testing:
Not reportedTrainman Testing:
Not reportedEngineer Testing:
Not reportedConductor Testing:
XXXSub Part C Testing Req:
Not reportedFBI Contact Date Time:
Not reportedFBI Contact:
Not reportedCR Change Date:
Not reportedCR End Date:
Not reportedCR Begin Date:
Not reportedTransit Bus Flag:
Not reportedService Disruption Units:
Not reportedService Disruption Time:
Not reportedDate Tiem Normal Service:
UAirbag Deployed:
UStructure Operational:
Not reportedStructure Name:
Not reportedType of Structure:
UAllision:
Not reportedContinuous Release Permit:
Not reportedInitial Continuous Release No:
Not reportedContinuous Release Type:
Not reportedBerth Slip Number:
Not reportedPier Dock Number:
Not reportedState Lease Number:
Not reportedOCSP Number:
Not reportedOCSG Number:
Not reportedLocation Block ID:
Not reportedLocation Area ID:
Not reportedPlatform Letter:
Not reportedPlatform Rig Name:
Not reportedActual Amount Units:
Not reportedActual Amount:
Not reportedCapacity of Tank Units:
Not reportedCapacity of Tank:
Not reportedTank ID:
Not reportedTank Regulated By:
UTank Regulated:
UTransportable Container:
ABOVETank Above Ground:
Not reportedDescription of Tank:
UBrake Failure:
Not reportedDOT Crossing Number:
UDevice Operational:
Not reportedCrossing Device Type:
Not reportedType Vehicle Involved:
Not reportedRailroad Milepost:
Not reportedLocation Subdivision:
UGrade Crossing:
Not reportedRailroad Hotline:
UPipeline Covered:
NExposed Underwater:
ABOVEPipeline Above Ground:
(Continued)2010941034
TC6916586.2s Page 11
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedWave Condition:
Not reportedSheen Odor Description:
Not reportedDirection of Sheen Travel:
Not reportedSheen Color:
Not reportedSheen Size:
UWater Supply Contaminated:
Not reportedWind Direction:
Not reportedWind Speed:
Not reportedAir Temperature:
CLEARWeather Conditions:
Not reportedOther Agency Notified:
NONEState Agency Report Number:
STATE AND SHERIFFState Agency on Scene:
TO BE DETERMINEDDesc Remedial Action:
Not reportedRelease rate:
Not reportedEstimated Duration of Release:
URelease Secured:
Not reportedTributary of:
Not reportedBody of Water:
ADJACENT TO WETLANDSAdditional Medium Info:
LANDMedium Desc:
NONEMedia Interest:
Not reportedTrack Closure Time:
Not reportedTrack Desc:
NTrack Closed:
NMajor Artery:
Not reportedClosure Direction:
Not reportedRoad Closure Time:
Not reportedRoad Desc:
NRoad Closed:
Not reportedWaterway Closure Time:
Not reportedWaterway Desc:
NWaterway Closed:
Not reportedAir Closure Time:
Not reportedAir Corridor Desc:
NAir Corridor Closed:
Not reportedDamage Amount:
NAny Damages:
Not reportedNumber Fatalities:
NAny Fatalities:
Not reportedNumber Hospitalized:
Not reportedNumber Injured:
NAny Injuries:
Not reportedRadius of Evacuation:
Not reportedWho Evacuated:
Not reportedNumber Evacuated:
NAny Evacuations:
UFire Extinguished:
NFire Involved:
941034NRC Report #:
Incident Details:
XXXPassenger Delay:
XXXPassenger Route:
Not reportedPassenger Handling:
Not reportedUnknown Testing:
Not reportedOther Employee Testing:
(Continued)2010941034
TC6916586.2s Page 12
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedUnit of Measure Reach Water:
Not reportedAmount in Water:
NOIf Reached Water:
UNKNOWN OIL/SOIL MIXTUREName of Material:
UNKNOWN AMOUNTUnit of Measure:
0Amount of Material:
Not reportedUN Number:
000000-00-0Case Number:
OUNChris Code:
941034NRC Report #:
Material Involved:
TELEPHONESource:
Not reportedOn Behalf:
Not reportedResponsible Zip:
XXResponsible State:
Not reportedResponsible City:
UNKNOWNResponsible Org Type:
Not reportedResponsible Company:
INCCall Type:
2010-05-20 16:12:21Date Time Complete:
2010-05-20 16:03:43Date Time Received:
2010941034Site ID:
941034NRC Report #:
Calls:
NOPassengers Transferred:
Not reportedRelease Rate Rate:
Not reportedRelease Rate Unit:
Not reportedDuration Unit:
NOffshore:
Not reportedSheen Size Width Units:
Not reportedSheen Size Width:
Not reportedSheen Size Length Units:
Not reportedSheen Size Length:
Not reportednearest River Mile Marker:
ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERSFederal Agency Notified:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITYState Agency Notified:
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.Additional Info:
Not reportedSheen Size Units:
Not reportedTrack CLosure Units:
Not reportedRoad Closure Units:
Not reportedCurrent Speed Unit:
Not reportedOccupant Fatality:
Not reportedPassenger Injuries:
Not reportedEmployee Injuries:
Not reportedWind Speed Unit:
Not reportedCommunity Impact:
Not reportedPass Fatality:
Not reportedEmpl Fatality:
Not reportedTrack Close Dir:
Not reportedWater Temperature:
Not reportedCurrent Direction:
Not reportedCurrent Speed:
(Continued)2010941034
TC6916586.2s Page 13
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedTelephone:
RANDY AND THELMA FOYContact Person:
THELMA GRACE FOY FARMCompany:
WASRegion:
CJWRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.08733 -77.40165Lat/Long Decimal:
Not reportedLat/Long:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
TrueRPOP:
TrueRPOW:
0Reel Num:
587CD Num:
TrueRPL:
3PETOPT:
G1RBCA GW:
ACurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
NoMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
RESLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
Not reportedRisk Classification:
CCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
NTank Regulated Status:
S3Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
08/31/2010Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
05/27/2010Cleanup:
05/18/2010Date Occur:
05/18/2010Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
2Source Type:
GWContamination Type:
93068Incident Number:
WA-88878UST Number:
Not reportedFacility ID:
TRENTON, NC 28585City,State,Zip:
946 NOBLES LOOP RDAddress:
THELMA GRACE FOY FARMName:
LAST:
Site 2 of 2 in cluster B
1 ft.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
40 ft.

< 1/8 TRENTON, NC 28585
946 NOBLES LOOP RD N/A
B5 LASTTHELMA GRACE FOY FARM S110629545
TC6916586.2s Page 14
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
COIncident Phase:
8/31/2010Last Modified:
ESource Type:
Not reportedSource:
Not reportedCause:
9Release Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7#5 Min Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
YSamples Taken By:
Not reportedWells Affected Number:
NWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedSite Priority:
7Location:
3Type:
4Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
JONES COUNTY (WEST OF TRENTON)
ILLEGAL DUMPING OF PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED SOIL ON FOY FAMILY FARM INDescription Of Incident:
5/18/2010Date Reported:
5/18/2010Date Occurred:
93068Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
SENT FOR ARCHIVING JANUARY 2016Comments:
Not reportedRP County:
TRENTON, NC 28585RP City,St,Zip:
216 FOY LANERP Address:
THELMA GRACE FOY FARM (Continued) S110629545
TC6916586.2s Page 15
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
Count: 0 records.
NO SITES FOUND
TC6916586.2s Page 16
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6916586.2s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916586.2s Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916586.2s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 9
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site’s responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 12/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916586.2s Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 0
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916586.2s Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 01/03/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2022
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916586.2s Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916586.2s Page GR-8
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916586.2s Page GR-9
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 02/23/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 0
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC6916586.2s Page GR-10
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC6916586.2s Page GR-11
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 11/16/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 11/16/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Listing
List of PFAS facilities
Date of Government Version: 11/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 12/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-12
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/16/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916586.2s Page GR-13
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 239
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916586.2s Page GR-14
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC6916586.2s Page GR-15
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916586.2s Page GR-16
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-17
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6916586.2s Page GR-18
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-19
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-20
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 95
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-21
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-22
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 09/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum-contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-23
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6916586.2s Page GR-24
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-25
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013
Number of Days to Update: 172
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 11/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6916586.2s Page GR-26
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
TC6916586.2s Page GR-27
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6916586.2s Page GR-28
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TC6916586.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
2019Version Date:
13720824 TRENTON, NCEast Map:
2019Version Date:
13720790 PHILLIPS CROSSROADS, NCTarget Property Map:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
41 ft. above sea levelElevation:
3884544.2UTM Y (Meters):
280830.8UTM X (Meters):
Zone 18Universal Tranverse Mercator:
77.403904 - 77ˆ 24’ 14.05’’Longitude (West):
35.081658 - 35ˆ 4’ 53.97’’Latitude (North):
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
TRENTON, NC 28585
108 FOY LANE
FOY FARM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®
TC6916586.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 41 ft.
North South
West East
4138
40404142404041413839393535
22171812
25 23
25 23
27 25 25
37
40 41 40 37
41 40 40 39 40 37
39
General NorthGeneral Topographic Gradient:
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6916586.2s Page A-3
Not Reported
GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION
GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapPHILLIPS CROSSROADS
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720448800J
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720448900J
Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720446800J
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6916586.2s Page A-4
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra:
TertiarySystem:
EoceneSeries:
TeCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
2
5
1
4
4
3
2
4
2
2
0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
TC6916586.2s Page A-6

Moderately well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group:
very fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture:
ExumSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 2
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay loam79 inches 5 inches 2
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayloam 5 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 38 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Somewhat poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class:
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group:
loamSoil Surface Texture:
NahuntaSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 1
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6916586.2s Page A-7

> 15 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: All hydric
Poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class:
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group:
loamSoil Surface Texture:
GranthamSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 3
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay loam64 inches 7 inches 2
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clay
loam
very fine sandy 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 76 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6916586.2s Page A-8
No Layer Information available.

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class:
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group:
loamSoil Surface Texture:
WaterSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 4
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clay
sand
loam to loam to
stratified clay79 inches72 inches 4
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayloam72 inches16 inches 3
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clay
loam
very fine sandy16 inches14 inches 2
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayloam14 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6916586.2s Page A-9
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsandy clay loam79 inches55 inches 3
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsandy clay loam55 inches14 inches 2
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularloamy fine sand14 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 122 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
loamy fine sandSoil Surface Texture:
NorfolkSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 5
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6916586.2s Page A-10
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
No Wells Found
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
No PWS System Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1/8 - 1/4 Mile NWUSGS40000884471 1
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1.000State Database
Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS
1.000Federal USGS
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
40 4
0
40
40
4040
4
0
40
404
0
4
0 40
40
4
0
40
4 0
40 40
4 040
40 4
0 4
0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4
0
4
0
40
4
0
40
4 0 4 0
4 0
4
0 40
40 40 4 0404040
40 40
40
4
0 40
40
40
4
0 40
4 0 4
0
4
0
4 0
4040
4
0
4 0
4 0
40 40
40 4
04040
4 0 40
4
040
40
40
4 0 4040
4040 4 0
40
4 0 40 40
4
0
40
40 4 0
4 040
4
0
4
0
40
4
0
4 0
4 040
4
04040
40
0
4 0
4 0
40
4
0 4 0
4 0
40
4
0
40
4 0
4 0
4 040
4
0
4
0
4
0
40
4 0
4 04
0
4
0
4
04
0
40
4
0
404040
NC
TC6916586.2s Page A-12
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 12Feet below surface:
1960Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 92Well Depth:
Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Castle Hayne LimestoneFormation Type: Castle Hayne aquiferAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
03020204HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: JO-006Monitor Location:
USGS North Carolina Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-NCOrganization ID:
1
NW
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Higher
USGS40000884471FED USGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6916586.2s Page A-13
NC10003387Edr id:3387Site id:
BSig:Not ReportedQuality type:
TRENT RIVER AQUATIC HABITATSitename:503.86Acres:
NC10003387NC_SNHA
NC50012536Edr id:
782136Gisid:HEostat:
SPrecision1:AElclass:
NC50012536NC_NHEO
NC50010279Edr id:
13414Gisid:HEostat:
SPrecision1:IElclass:
NC50010279NC_NHEO
NC50008351Edr id:
172081Gisid:EEostat:
SPrecision1:AElclass:
NC50008351NC_NHEO
NC50007447Edr id:
13365Gisid:EEostat:
SPrecision1:IElclass:
NC50007447NC_NHEO
NC50004584Edr id:
43275Gisid:HEostat:
MPrecision1:AElclass:
NC50004584NC_NHEO
Map ID
Direction
Distance EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6916586.2s Page A-14
Not Reported
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Federal EPA Radon Zone for JONES County: 3
AREA RADON INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information SystemR
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6916586.2s Page PSGR-1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site’s significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6916586.2s Page PSGR-2
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6916586.2s Page PSGR-3
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1366v2) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Appendix F – SHPO Correspondence

April 4th, 2022

Renee Gledhill-Earley,
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Sent electronically to [e-mail]

Re: Foy Farm Mitigation Project, Jones County, NC

Dear Renee,

The purpose of this letter is to request written concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) for the Foy Farm Mitigation Project in Edgecombe County, a Nutrient Off-set Mitigation Bank
servicing the Neuse River Basin. Please review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge
with respect to SHPO from a potential stream restoration project depicted on the attached mapping.

Project Name: Foy Farm Mitigation Project
Project Location: 0 Foy Lane Trenton, NC 2585
Project Contact: JD Hamby, Restoration Systems LLC, 1101 Haynes St. Suite 211,
Raleigh, NC 27604

Project Description: The project has been identified for the purpose of providing in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable nutrient loading impacts. Permits from the NC DWR will be obtained to restore riparian
buffer areas that drain into waters of the US. Soil and erosion control permits will also be obtained. The
project encompasses ~62.75 acres of agricultural fields, currently used for row crops. All ~62.75 acres of
riparian buffer area will be replanted in native hardwoods.

The term “cultural resources” refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. “Significant” cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made
with reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (36 CFR 60) and in consultation with the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
Field visits were conducted in the spring of 2022 to conduct evaluations for presence of structures or
features that may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No significant structures or
ruins were identified within the parcel boundaries. In addition to field reviews for historically relevant
structures, a records search was conducted at the SHPO office to determine if documented occurrences

of historic structures or artifacts occur within, or adjacent to the Site. The SHPO records identify five
features within a 1.0-mile radius of the Site.
• JN0236 | Fred Noble Farm
• JN0209 | Banks House (Gone?)
• JN0210 | Clem Foy House (Gone?)
• JN0244 | Scott House
• JN0208 |Willie Banks House
Typical SHPO coordination will occur prior to construction activities to determine if any significant
cultural resources are present; however, no constraints are expected at this time. We thank you in
advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact me with any questions
that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.

Yours truly,

RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC

JD Hamby
Project Manager
[e-mail]
919-755-9490

Attachments – USGS Map, Existing Conditions
!.
Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
USGS 8-Digit HUC: 03020204USGS 14-Digit HUC: 03020204010070NC DWR Sub-Basin: 03-04-11
35.086417°, -77.401632°
Trent River
Neuse River
Neuse River
New River
White Oak River
CRAVENCOUNTY
JONESCOUNTY
CRAVENCOUNTY
ONSLOWCOUNTY
LENOIRCOUNTY
DUPLINCOUNTY
CARTERETCOUNTY
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance
Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
1³
Jones County, NC
RJH
APRIL 2022
1:215,000
2020-1366 v1
VICINITY MAP
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Legend
!.Foy Farm Bank Parcel Location Pin
NC Major Rivers
Jones County Boundary
North Carolina - USGS 8-Digit HUCs
North Carolina - USGS 14-Digit HUCs 0 5 102.5
Miles
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
Feature 1 Start
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1 Finish
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 7 Finsh Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 Finsh
Feature 6 Finsh
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6 Start
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 8 Finsh
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5 Finsh
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 2 Start
Feature 2 Finsh
Feature 2
Feature 3 Finsh
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Feature 3 Start
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
4³
Jones County, NC
RJH
APRIL 2022
1:5,500
2020-1366 v1
USGS MAP
2019Phillips Crossroads
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Legend
Subject Fee Simple Tract
Foy Farm - Proposed Conservation Easement: 67.427 acres
!(DWR Viability Pins - Feature Break Points
!(DWR Stream Determination Pins
Existing Powerline
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
In-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland08001,600400
Feet
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
Feature 1 Start
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1 Finish
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 7 Finsh Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 Finsh
Feature 6 Finsh
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6 Start
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 8 Finsh
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5 Finsh
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 2 Start
Feature 2 Finsh
Feature 2
Feature 3 Finsh
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Feature 3 Start
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
3³
Jones County, NC
RJH
APRIL 2022
1:5,500
2020-1366 v1
SITE MAP
2020 Aerial ImageryNC One Map
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Legend
Subject Fee Simple Tract
Foy Farm - Proposed Conservation Easement: 67.427 acres
!(DWR Viability Pins - Feature Break Points
!(DWR Stream Determination Pins
Existing Powerline
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
In-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland08001,600400
Feet

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.

Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

July 28, 2022

John Hamby [e-mail]
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604

Re: Foy Farm mitigation project, 0 Foy Lane, Trenton, Jones County, ER 22-1709

Dear Mr. Hamby:

Thank you for your email of June 23, 2022, regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.

We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.

Sincerely,

Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer

Foy Farm, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1366v2) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Appendix G – Template Conservation Easement