SwiftCreek20190117

SWIFT CREEK — PERMITTEE RESPONSIBLE MITIGATION PLAN
EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
USACE No. SAW-2016-02338
APPLICANTS:
How tomorrow moves
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (CSXT)
550 WATER STREET
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32202
MI 1.
OF
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION (NCDOT)
DIVISION 4
500 WARD BOULEVARD
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27895-3165
SUBMITTED TO:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (USACE)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
PREPARED BY:
WPaJustMnne
Palustrine Group, LLC
4157 Alston Chapel Rd
Pittsboro, NC 27312
and
wood
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
401 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27703
SUBMISSION DATE
January 17, 2019

CSX INTERMOQAL TERMINALS, INC.
Richard C. Hisrich
oweclorierminal Deveioprnenl
550 Water Street
Speed Code J732
Jacksonville, FL 32202
Tet.904-633-1427
CeA.904-252-4577
fWav Fax. [phone]
�a •�.
www.csx.com
ncchard-hisrich�yosx_com T

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................1
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................ 3
3. AVAILABLE MITIGATION......................................................................................................... 4
3.1. DETERMINATION OF CREDITS.................................................................................. 4
4. WATERSHED APPROACH.......................................................................................................... 7
4.1. 8-DIGIT HUC — UPPER TAR RIVER.............................................................................
7
4.1.1. Water Quality .....................................................................................................................
7
4.1.1.1. Historical Changes of Aquatic Resources in Watershed ............................................
7
4.1.1.2. Water Quality Issues in Watershed............................................................................
8
4.1.2. Wildlife..............................................................................................................................
8
4.1.2.1. Historical Losses of Wildlife Habitat.........................................................................
8
4.2. 10-DIGIT RUC - SWIFT CREEK....................................................................................
9
4.2.1. Water Quality .....................................................................................................................
9
4.2.1.1. Historical Changes of Aquatic Resources in Watershed ............................................
9
4.2.1.2. Water Quality Issues in Watershed............................................................................
10
4.2.2. Wildlife..............................................................................................................................
10
4.2.2.1. Historical Losses of Wildlife Habitat.........................................................................
10
4.3. AREAS FOR WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT.............................................................
10
4.3.1. Water Quality Needs in the Watershed..............................................................................
10
4.3.2. Wildlife Needs in the Watershed.......................................................................................
11
4.3.3. Ecological (Physical, Chemical and Biological) Suitability and Technical Feasibility
of the Site to Meet Water Quality and Wildlife Habitat Needs in Watershed ...................
11
4.3.4. Offsite Threats to Mitigation Efforts Constructed within the Mitigation Project Sites .....
11
5. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN...................................................................................12
5.1.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES............................................................................................
12
5.1.1.
Mitigation Project Objectives............................................................................................
12
5.2.
MITIGATION PROJECT LOCATION AND SELECTION ............................................
14
5.2.1.
Directions to the Project Site.............................................................................................
14
5.2.2.
Site Selection.....................................................................................................................
14
5.2.3.
Resource Equivalency........................................................................................................
15
5.2.3.1.
Comparison of Waters of the U.S..............................................................................
15
5.3.
BASELINE CONDITIONS....................................................................... .......................
15
5.3.1.
Physiography, Topography, and Land Use........................................................................
15
5.3.2.
Soils....................................................................................................................................16
5.3.3.
Valley Classification..........................................................................................................
16
5.3.4.
Jurisdictional Determination..............................................................................................
16
5.3.4.1.
Description of Jurisdictional Features........................................................................
17
5.3.5.
Existing Plant Communities...............................................................................................
18
5.3.6.
Baseline Stream Conditions...............................................................................................
19
5.3.7.
Stream Geomorphology — Proposed Restoration Reaches .................................................
19
5.3.8.
Wildlife..............................................................................................................................
20
5.3.9.
Protected Species...............................................................................................................
21
5.3.9.1.
Federally Listed Species............................................................................................
21
5.3.9.2.
State Species of Concern ............................................................................................
23
5.3.10.
Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Summary ..................................................................
27
5.4.
MITIGATION WORK PLAN..........................................................................................
27
5.4.1.
Mitigation Project Site.......................................................................................................
27
5.4.2.
Wetland Mitigation............................................................................................................
28
5.4.2.1. Wetland Preservation.................................................................................................
28

5.4.2.2.
Wetland Enhancement...............................................................................................
28
5.4.3. Hydrologic Monitoring......................................................................................................
28
5.4.4. Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Restoration and Natural Community Reestablishment .......
28
5.4.4.1.
Planting Plan............................................................................................. ..
...............
29
5.4.4.2.
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest..............................................................
29
5.4.4.3.
Cypress -Gum Swamp................................................................................................
29
5.4.4.4.
Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp...........................................................................
29
5.4.4.5.
Wet Pine/Mesic Pine Flatwoods Establishment.........................................................
29
5.4.4.6.
Mixed Hardwood Forest............................................................................................
30
5.4.4.7.
Vernal Pool Establishment.........................................................................................
30
5.4.4.8.
Prescribed Burns........................................................................................................
30
5.4.4.9.
Fire Breaks.................................................................................................................
30
5.4.5. Stream Mitigation..............................................................................................................
31
5.4.5.1.
Stream Preservation...................................................................................................
31
5.4.5.2.
Stream Restoration.....................................................................................................
31
5.4.5.2.1.
Headwater Stream Restoration..............................................................................
31
5.4.5.2.2.
Rosgen Priority 1 Restoration.................................................................................
31
5.4.6. Reference Sites................................................................................................................... 32
5.4.6.1. Reference Streams...................................................................................................... 32
5.4.6.2. Reference Wetlands................................................................................................... 32
5.5. FEMA FLOODPLAIN AND HYDROLOGIC TRESPASS ............................................. 32
5.6. Section 401/404 Permitting............................................................................................... 33
5.7. MAINTENANCE PLAN.................................................................................................. 33
5.8. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS..................................................................................... 33
5.8.1. Wetland Mitigation............................................................................................................ 33
5.8.1.1. Wetland Preservation................................................................................................. 33
5.8.1.2. Wetland Enhancement - Hydrology........................................................................... 34
5.8.2. Stream Mitigation..............................................................................................................
34
5.8.2.1.
Stream Preservation...................................................................................................
34
5.8.2.2.
Stream Restoration and Enhancement.......................................................................
34
5.8.2.2.1.
Dimension...............................................................................................................34
5.8.2.2.2.
Pattern and Profile...................................................................................................
35
5.8.2.2.3.
Substrate..................................................................................................................35
5.8.2.2.4.
Stream Hydrology...................................................................................................
35
5.8.2.2.5.
Macroinvertebrates.................................................................................................
35
5.8.2.2.6.
Headwater Stream...................................................................................................
35
5.8.3.
Vegetation..........................................................................................................................36
5.8.4.
Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Restoration..........................................................................
36
5.8.5.
Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Preservation.........................................................................
37
5.8.6.
Visual Monitoring..............................................................................................................
37
5.9.
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................
37
5.9.1.
As -built Survey..................................................................................................................
38
5.9.2.
Wetland Preservation.........................................................................................................
38
5.9.3.
Wetland Enhancement and Restoration — Hydrology........................................................
38
5.9.4.
Vegetation..........................................................................................................................39
5.9.5.
Stream Preservation...........................................................................................................
40
5.9.6.
Stream Restoration and Enhancement...............................................................................
40
5.9.6.1.
Dimension..........................................................................................................................40
5.9.6.2.
Pattern and Profile..............................................................................................................
51
5.9.6.3.
Hydrology..........................................................................................................................
51
5.9.6.4.
Macroinvertebrate..............................................................................................................
52
5.9.6.5.
Headwater..........................................................................................................................
52
5.9.7.
Visual................................................................... ...............................................................52
ii

5.10. LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT...................................................................................... 53
5.11. SITE PROTECTION......................................................................................................... 54
5.12. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN.............................................................................. 54
5.13. FINANCIAL ASSURANCES........................................................................................... 54
5.14. CLOSURE.........................................................................................................................55
6. REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................56
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Summary of Wetland and Stream Mitigation................................................................................. 4
Table 2. Determination of Mitigation Credit Generation.............................................................................. 5
Table 3. List of Federally Endangered or Threatened Species in the Upper Tar River Basin ..................... 9
Table 4. Objectives for the Mitigation Project...........................................................................................13
Table 5. Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils.............................................................................16
Table 6. Evaluated Jurisdictional Features within the Mitigation Project..................................................17
Table 7. Stream Summary Information......................................................................................................19
Table 8. Potential for occurrence of federally listed animal and plant species within the
Mitigation Site, Edgecombe County, North Carolina.................................................................. 22
Table 9. Site Suitable, State Species of Concern for Edgecombe County, North Carolina ....................... 24
APPENDIX A: MAPS AND FIGURES
SiteLocation Map..................................................................................................................................... 1
......................
Proximity to Conserved Lands Map............................................................................. ......
2
LandCover Map — RUC 8........................................................................................................................
3a
LandCover Map — HUC 10......................................................................................................................
3b
USGS7.5 Topographical Map..................................................................................................................4
HistoricMap(1905)..................................................................................................................................
5a
HistoricMap(1908)..................................................................................................................................
5b
AerialPhotograph(1954)..........................................................................................................................
6a
AerialPhotograph(1977)..........................................................................................................................
6b
AerialPhotograph(1982)........................................................................................................ ..................
6c
AerialPhotograph(1994)..........................................................................................................................
6d
AerialPhotograph(1998)..........................................................................................................................
6e
AerialPhotograph(2008)..........................................................................................................................
6f
AerialPhotograph(2013)..........................................................................................................................
6g
AerialPhotograph(2016).........................................................................................................................
6h
...................
LIDAR Imagery ............................................................................................................... ......
7
USDASoil Survey Map............................................................................................................................
8
National Wetland Inventory Map..............................................................................................................
9
AquaticResources Map............................................................................................................................10
Plant Communities Map (Existing Conditions)........................................................................................
11
PhotoLocations Map................................................................................................................................
12
CulturalResources Map............................................................................................................................
13a
CulturalResources Map............................................................................................................................
13b
MitigationWork Plan ................................................................................................................................
14a
Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Plan............................................................................................................
14b
USACE Conservation Easement Map......................................................................................................15
FEMAFloodplain Map.............................................................................................................................
16
Proposed Monitoring Plan Map................................................................................................................
17
iii

APPENDIX B:
DRAFT SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENTS (USAGE Template)
APPENDIX C:
BASELINE CONDITIONS REPORT
APPENDIX D:
PHOTO LOG
APPENDIX E:
HYDRIC SOILS EVALUATION
APPENDIX F:
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES REPORT
APPENDIX G:
30% STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN DRAWINGS
APPENDIX H:
PRELIMINARY JURISDICITONAL REQUEST
APPENDIX I:
ENDANGERED AND PROTECTED SPECIES SEARCH
APPENDIX J:
CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORTS
APPENDIX K:
NCDWR BUFFER VIABILITY LETTER
APPENDIX L:
MITIGATION AVAILABILITY CORRESPONDANCE
iv

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), a subsidiary of CSX Corporation (CSX), a Virginia Company, intends
to construct a new intermodal freight terminal, known as the Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal
(CCX Terminal), a siding to access the terminal and associated reconstruction of former second mainline
track in the vicinity of the terminal (Line of Road Improvements). The North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) is supporting the CCX project with significant funding and is a co -applicant on
this permit application. The Project Area is approximately 681 acres and is comprised of the two
components, the CCX Terminal and Line of Road Improvements. The CCX Terminal consists of
approximately 635 acres and is generally located along the western edge of Edgecombe County, north of
the City of Rocky Mount, and between the existing CSX mainline and Old Battleboro Road. The Line of
Road Improvements component is part of the CSXT North End Subdivision, which runs along the county
line between Edgecombe County and Nash County, North Carolina, and generally' runs parallel to the I-95
corridor. This Line of Road Improvements project runs from CSX Milepost A115.4 (south of CCX) through
the intermodal facility north to Milepost A110.6 and encompasses approximately 46 acres. These areas
extend from north of the City of Rocky Mount through the Town of Battleboro. North Carolina.
The project primarily consists of agricultural land with few residential and commercial buildings and
woodlands dispersed throughout. College Road, a secondary road, bisects the site near the western portion.
Other roadways of note include Old Battleboro Road (northeast boundary of site) and Instrument
Drive/Fountain Park Drive (southern section). The western boundary of the CCX Terminal abuts the North
End Subdivision of the existing CSX mainline known as the A -Line and the proposed siding track. Beech
Branch, unnamed tributaries and associated wetlands, agricultural/recreational ponds, and agricultural
ditches are also present within the CCX Terminal. Beech Branch is the northeast boundary of the site. Two
unnamed tributaries of Beech Branch traverse the central portion of the site. An unnamed tributary of
Compass Creek traverses the southern portion of the CCX Terminal. Two cemeteries and a
telecommunications tower are present within the CCX Terminal project area, as well as a former
commercial business and a number of scattered, single-family residential lots, abandoned home site, and
abandoned agricultural buildings. The project site is located within the Tat -Pamlico River Basin and is
therefore subject to the specific river basin riparian buffer rules.
In the absence of suitable existing private wetland, stream, and riparian buffer mitigation bank credits (see
Appendix L for correspondence) and in lieu of purchasing credits from the North Carolina Department of
Mitigation Services (NCDMS), all required compensatory mitigation will be obtained through an off -site
permittee-responsible mitigation project utilizing a watershed approach. The Swift Creek — Permittee
Responsible Mitigation Plan (Mitigation Project) was designed to achieve a landscape -scale conservation
outcome based on the priorities of both local and regional environmental advocacy groups and the federal
and state regulatory and resource agencies.
Swift Creek is located within the same watershed as the CCX Terminal and Line of Road Improvements
Project (see Figure 1 in Appendix A). The Swift Creek Subbasin has been identified as possibly the most
significant lotic creek ecosystem remaining along the Atlantic Seaboard (Alderman, et at., 1993). Swift
Creek is a major tributary of the Tar River, flowing southeast from Henderson in Vance County, then
through Warren, Franklin, Nash, and Edgecombe Counties to its confluence with the Tar River above the
Town of Tarboro in Edgecombe County, North Carolina. The overall goal of the mitigation site selection
process was to enhance and improve the protection of this critical resource.
Federal and state resource agencies and the Tar River Land Conservancy (TRLC) communicated the
importance of considering the needs of the local community and including their input as the mitigation plan
was developed. This included both the availability of public lands for recreation and the support and
protection of rural lifestyles.
Based on the guidance of these and other key stakeholders, and in order to meet the requirements of an
acceptable mitigation plan as defined by federal and state regulatory agencies, the proposed Mitigation
Project presented herein as a suitable Permittee Responsible Mitigation (PRM) project to offset unavoidable
Page 1 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
impacts associated with the development of the CCX Terminal and Line of Road Improvements Project.
This Mitigation Project is part of the Swift Creek Property (formerly Wilson Farm) (--593 acres) and is
currently owned by Palustrine Group LLC. This PRM plan addresses the same property which was
proposed for the initial terminal design permit application. Since the impacts have been significantly
reduced, the applicants and the mitigation sponsor have decided to offer a specific geographic portion of
the Swift Creek Property to adequately and completely mitigate for the reduced stream, wetland, and
riparian buffer impacts associated with the new terminal. The mitigation sponsor's intent is to eventually
protect the entire property if a mitigation bank can be permitted on the residual acreage of the Swift Creek
Property in the future. However, for this permit, only the specifically -designated portion of the Swift Creek
Property in this application and Permittee Responsible Mitigation (PRM) plan will be designated for the
permittee-responsible mitigation. The revised Mitigation Project has been designed to preserve, restore,
and enhance approximately 63 acres of wetlands and 8,576 linear feet (-1.6 miles) of unnamed headwater
tributaries within approximately 196.5 acres of property. These resources will be permanently protected in
the Swift Creek watershed, a tributary of Tar River defined as critical priority areas needing protection by
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), the NC Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP), and the TRLC. The remaining portions of the Swift Creek Property not utilized in this PRM
plan are being considered as a potential migration bank subject to Department of the Army, United States
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and NCDEQ approvals. It is expected that once the remaining portion
of the Swift Creek Property is accepted as a mitigation bank, an acceptable USACE/NCDEQ conservation
easement will be placed on the remaining portions of the property. Following construction of
identified/approved restoration and enhancement activities, the easements will be transferred to the
Conservation Trust for North Carolina and the fee title of the Swift Creek Property, including the PRM
area, will be transferred to the TRLC.
The proposed Mitigation Project satisfies the requirements of Department of the Army (DA) permits issued
in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Sections 9 and 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899 and includes the twelve components required by the 2008 United States Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) and USACE 33 C.F.R. Parts 325 and 332 & 40 C.F.R. Part 230 (Mitigation
Rule) and Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08-03, issued in October, 2008. Proposed mitigation activities
are not anticipated to adversely impact protected species or cultural resources. This PRM plan includes
specific goals and objectives for water resource mitigation, as well as site selection factors, site protection,
baseline conditions of the mitigation site, mitigation work plan, maintenance plan, performance standards,
monitoring requirements, long term management plans, adaptive management provisions, and financial
assurances for its success.
Additionally, this Mitigation Project satisfies the requirements and provisions of 15A NCAC 02B .0258
(Tar -Pamlico River Basin -Nutrient Sensitive Water Management Strategy), 15A NCAC 0213 .0295
(Consolidated Mitigation Buffer Rule), and 15A NCAC 02B .0240 (Nutrient Offset Payments). Mitigation
for impacts to buffers associated with the CCX Terminal and Line of Road Improvements Project will be
accomplished through the establishment of buffers (--200 feet) within the Mitigation Project. The
Mitigation Project is designed to reestablish approximately 26.10 acres of Tar -Pamlico riparian buffer along
the proposed restoration reaches and permanently preserve approximately 15.20 acres of Tar -Pamlico
riparian buffer.
Based on the current design and assumptions for the CCX Terminal and Line of Road Improvements
Project, the Tar -Pamlico nutrient offsets for the project are not required. If Tar -Pamlico nutrient offsets are
required for this proj ect due to changes in the design or other reasons, the Applicant reserves the opportunity
to supply the required Tar -Pamlico nutrient offsets credits through an approved nutrient offset bank or
through the establishment of a permittee-responsible nutrient program, subject to the review and approval
of the appropriate agencies.
In conclusion, the Mitigation Project is designed to achieve a meaningful landscape conservation outcome
based on the guidance of the local and regional environmental groups as well as satisfy the requirements of
federal and state resource agencies.
Page 2 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan (hereinafter "Mitigation Project") is a proposed
Permittee Responsible Mitigation (PRM) site provided to offset impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
associated with the development of Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal (CCX Terminal), a siding
to access the terminal, associated reconstruction of former second mainline track, and a south lead track in
the vicinity of the terminal (Line of Road Improvements) (hereinafter "CCX Terminal and Line of Road
Improvements Project"). The Mitigation Project is located within the Swift Creek Property (approximately
593 acres) of which approximately 160 acres will be protected with a joint Department of the Army, United
States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) / North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ) - approved conservation easement located in Edgecombe County, North Carolina. The
Mitigation Project is made up of a private land holding (held by Palustrine Group LLC) located along Swift
Creek, a tributary of the Tar River. This Mitigation Project is intended to provide mitigation for
jurisdictional impacts to waters of the U.S. associated with the development of the CCX Terminal and Line
of Road Improvements Project. The mitigation area is within the same United States Geologic Survey
(USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020101 of the Upper Tar River Subbasin and is wholly
located within the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain EPA Level III Ecoregion (N 33.332°, W 80.300°; Figure
1 in Appendix A). The proposed Mitigation Project provides the opportunity to protect a large contiguous
acreage of wetlands and headwater unnamed tributaries to Swift Creek that will further advance the efforts
of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(DMS), NCDEQ, the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP), and the Tar River Land Conservancy
(TRLC) in the Tar River and Swift Creek watersheds, foment an anchor for the preservation and
conservation of lands along Swift Creek, as well as enhance the on -going efforts to protect and restore
populations of the Tar River Spinymussel (Eiliptio steinstansana) habitat.
The Mitigation Project area consists of bottomland hardwood and headwater stream and wetland systems
along Swift Creek. The proposed Mitigation Project will include wetland and stream preservation,
enhancement, and restoration of approximately 51.9 acres of wetlands and approximately 8,576 linear feet
(1.62 miles) of streams within the 196.5-acre Mitigation Project. Additionally the project will include the
restoration of approximately 26.10 acres of Tar -Pamlico riparian buffer and the preservation of 15.2 acres
of Tar -Pamlico riparian buffer.
The Permittee Responsible Mitigation (PRM) plan is based upon the best information available at this time
and all prescriptions and quantities provided herein for stream and wetland features are subject to federal
and state agency verification. Comments from the federal and state agencies and the commenting public
will be addressed and incorporated into this mitigation plan.
Page 3 of 57

Swift Creek — Pe ee Responsible Mitigation Plan
LrdgkTinbe County, North Carolina
3. AVAILABLE MITIGATION
The anticipated Section 404 Individual Permit for the development of the CCX em- inal and Line of Road
Improvements Project (approximately 681 acres) within the Upper Tar River ubbasin (HUC 03020101)
north of Rocky Mount, Edgecombe County, North Carolina, requires mitigati for impacts to 6.87 acres
of jurisdictional wetlands, 4,042 linear feet (LF) of "Relatively Permanent Wate s" (RPWs), and 3.89 acres
(169,266 sq. feet) of Zone I and 2.54 acres (110,770 sq. feet) of Zone 2 riparian buffers. The proposed
impacts will require approximately 12.71 wetland credits, 7,052.50 stream credits, and 15.47 acres (673,955
sq. feet) Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Compensatory Mitigation Credits.
Since this large-scale mitigation effort cannot be addressed with existing private mitigation banks in the
watershed and in -lieu of purchasing credit from North Carolina Department of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS), a permittee-responsible mitigation site is proposed to meet the required compensatory wetland
mitigation requirement and riparian buffer mitigation requirement. The Applicants and their Agents have
prepared this PRM plan to satisfy the proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S and Tar -Pamlico
riparian buffers.
This PRM plan is comprised of the Mitigation Project and is intended to provide complete mitigation for
jurisdictional impacts to waters of the U.S. associated with the development of the CCX Terminal and Line
of Road Improvements Project and to offset impacts to riparian buffers as regulated by the State of North
Carolina. If Tar -Pamlico nutrient offsets are required for this project due to changes in the design or other
reasons, the Applicant reserves the opportunity to supply the required Tar -Pamlico nutrient offsets credits
through an approved nutrient offset bank or through the establishment of a permittee-responsible nutrient
program, subject to the review and approval of the appropriate agencies.
A summary of the jurisdictional waters of the U.S. proposed for mitigation is provided below in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of Wetland and Stream Mitigation
RWR 're' rtnittee AMOK ible Miti ation Plan
Stream
Tar -Pamlico
Riparian
Mitigation
Wetland
Wetland
Stream
Riparian
Site
Preservation
Enhancement
Preservation
Restoration
Buffer
Buffer
(Acreage)
(Acreage)
(Acreage)
(Linear Feet)
(Linear
Restoration
Preservation
Feet
Acreage)
(Acreage)
-196.5
34.9
17.0
383
8,193
26.10
15.20
Some wetland preservation areas within the floodplain of Swift Creek have been allocated for riparian
buffer restoration. In total, approximately 11.0 acres of wetland preservation of the total 63 acres that have
been identified within the Mitigation Project have not been illustrated above in Table 1 and are included
the Riparian Buffer Restoration column.
3.1. DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Mitigation credits presented below in Table 2 are projections based upon the proposed mitigation work plan
contained herein. Upon completion of site construction, the project components and credits data will be
revised to be consistent with the as -built condition and submitted to the USACE for review and approval.
6�
Page 4 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Table 2. Determination of Mitigation Credit Generation
SWIFT CREEK - PERMITTEE RESPONSIBLE MITIGATION WORK PLAN
STREAM MITIGATION
RESTORATION
FEATURE NAME
PROPOSED
LENGTH
LF
PROPOSED
SINUOSITY
MITIGATION CREDIT
GENERATION RATIO
PROPOSED MITIGATION
CREDIT GENERATION
TRIBUTARY A-1
(Headwater)
533
1.00
1.0:1.0
533.0
TRIBUTARY A-1
5,940
1.20
1.0:1.0
5,925.0
TRIBUTARY B-2
(Headwater)
1,056
1.00
1.0:1.0
1,056.0
TRIBUTARY K
679
1.20
1.0:1.0
679.0
STREAM RESTORATION
CREDIT SUBTOTAL
7,514.0
PRESERVATION
FEATURE NAME
PROPOSED
LENGTH
LF
MITIGATION CREDIT
GENERATION RATIO
PROPOSED MITIGATION
CREDIT GENERATION
TRIBUTARY B-1
383
�.0:1.0
76.6
STREAM PRESERVATION CREDIT SUBTOTAL
76.6 _
i TOTAL STREAM MITIGATION CREDIT GENERATION
7,590.6
WETLAND MITIGATION
ENHANCEMENT
FEATURE NAME
ACREAGE
(Acres)
MITIGATION CREDIT
GENERATION RATIO
PROPOSED MITIGATION
CREDIT GENERATION
WETLAND NO. 7
0.3
2.5:1.0
0.14
WETLAND NO. 11
5.6
2.5:1.0
2.24
WETLAND NO. 12
11.1
2.5:1.0
4.44
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT CREDIT SUBTOTAL
6.80
PRESERVATION
FEATURE NAME
ACREAGE
(Acres)
MITIGATION CREDIT
GENERATION RATIO
PROPOSED MITIGATION
CREDIT GENERATION
WETLAND NO. 4
2.1
5.0:1.0
0.42
WETLAND NO. 5
0.01
5.0:1.0
0.002
WETLAND NO. 6
0.06
5.0:1.0
0.01
WETLAND NO. 10
29.5
5.0:1.0
5.91
WETLAND NO. 13
3.2
5.0:1.0
0.63
WETLAND PRESERVATION CREDIT SUBTOTAL
6.98
TOTAL WETLAND MITIGATION CREDIT GENERATION
13.78
Page 5 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION
MITIGATION
FULL
PROPOSED RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE
MITIGATION
ACRES
CREDIT
CREDIT
BUFFER CREDIT
,TYPE
GENERATION
AVAILABLE
GENERATION
RATIO
ACRES / S . FT.
TRIBUTARY A -I
Restoration
13.05
1.0:1.0
1001"
13.05 ! 568,458
(TOB — 100')
TRIBUTARY K
Restoration
TOB — 100')
1.23
1.0:1.0
100%
1.23 / 53,579
TRIBUTARY A -I
Restoration
11.11
\ 3a�41-
h 100%
3.70 / 161,317
(100'— 200')
TRIBUTARY K
Restoration
0.71
~ 3_{G-"
rI. 140.0/0
'
0.24 / 10,309
(TOB — 100')
�•
r�
TRIBUTARY A-1
preservation
(TOB — 100')
8.12
10.0:1.0
100%
0.81 / 35,371
TRIBUTARY B-1
preservation
(TOB — 100')
1.09
10.0:1.0
53%
0.06 / 2,516
TRIBUTARY B-2
preservation
2.13
10.0:1.0
0%
0.0 / 0.0
(TOB — 100')
TRIBUTARY I-1
Preservation
2.98
5.0:1.0
0%
0.0 / 0.0
(TOB — 100')
TRIBUTARY K
Preservation
0.88
5.0:1.0
0%
0.0 / 0.0
(TOB — 100')
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PRESERVATION/EPHEMERAL CREDIT
GENERATION (25% CAP) ACRES/SQ. FEET
8.70 / 378,972
TOTAL STREAM BUFFER CREDIT GENERATION
19.09 ac. / 831,550 sq. ft.
Page 6 of 57

Swift Creek— Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
4. WATERSHED APPROACH
4.1. 8-DIGIT HUC — UPPER TAR RIVER
The proposed Mitigation Project is located in the Upper Tar River Subbasin (8-digit HUC 03020101). The
Upper Tar River Subbasin contains the headwaters of the Tar River and its tributaries to Tarboro, NC. The
Tar River flows southeasterly until it reaches tidal waters near Washington where it becomes the Pamlico
River and from there flows into the Pamlico Sound (NC DNR 2010). Major tributaries of the Tar River
include Cokey Swamp, the Pungo River, Fishing Creek, Tranters Creek, and Swift Creek which flows along
the border of the proposed Mitigation Project. The Upper Tar River Basin is located in portions of Person,
Granville, Franklin, Vance, Nash, Edgecombe, and Warren Counties, and drains approximately 1,305
square miles.
The Upper Tar River Basin drains two EPA Level III ecoregions: Piedmont and Southeastern Plains. The
upper reaches of the watershed cover the transitional Piedmont ecoregion (45). The subbasin is represented
by several EPA Level IV ecoregions including the Northern Outer Piedmont (450, portions of the Triassic
Basin (45g) and Carolina Slate Belt (45c). Streams in the Carolina Slate Belt ecoregion are vulnerable to
summer drought because of poor groundwater recharge (NC DWQ 2011). Low summer flows are
associated with limited ability to assimilate oxygen -consuming wastes. Streams in the Piedmont ecoregion
are generally low gradient with sluggish pools separated by riffles and rapids (NC DNR). Piedmont soils
are highly erodible with rock formations that have limited water storage capacity underneath. There are a
few reservoirs in the Piedmont that serve as water supplies, but no natural lakes.
The predominant ecoregion in the lower portion of the subbasin, where the proposed site is located, is the
Southeastern Plains ecoregion (65). Natural vegetation in the Southeastern Plains ecoregion is
predominantly longleaf pine with patches of oak -hickory -pine (Griffith, et al.). Elevations and relief are
generally less than in much of the Piedmont. Streams in the Southeastern Plains ecoregion can generally be
characterized by low -gradients and sandy bottoms (Griffith, et al.).
According to the USGS 2011 National Land Cover Dataset ("NLCD") land cover data, 54.3 percent of the
Upper Tar River Subbasin is forested land, 21 percent is urban land, 8 percent is wetland, and less than l
percent is open water, and the remaining 27.1 percent is barren land and agriculture. Development and
population growth centers around Rocky Mount and smaller municipalities including Dortches, Red Oak,
Louisburg, Henderson and Oxford in the upper part of the Subbasin. It is expected that the percentage of
urban area has increased since 2011. Most of the land use in the upper subbasin consists of a mixture of
agriculture, rural residences, and remnant forest (NC DWQ 2011). Land use in the lower portion of the
subbasin is divided relatively evenly between agriculture, forest, rural residences, and urbanized areas (NC
DWQ 2011).
4.1.1. Water Quality
4.1.1.1. Historical Changes of Aquatic Resources in Watershed
Historical changes in land cover from 1992 to 2011 were analyzed for the Upper Tar River Subbasin
using the NLCD data and is illustrated on Figure 3a in Appendix A. During this 19-year period, the
developed areas increased dramatically from 4.4% to 21%, approximately 175,206 acres, for the basin.
Development and population growth centers around Rocky Mount and smaller municipalities including
Dortches, Red Oak, Louisburg, Henderson and Oxford in the upper part of the watershed. As development
increases, so do the demands and stress placed on rivers and streams within the watershed.
Between the 1780s and the 1980s, North Carolina lost 49 percent of its wetlands (Dahl, 1990). A historical
comparison of the area of total wetlands in the Upper Tar River Basin (8-digit HUC 03020101) is a complex
task, as the data collection processes have changed and improved over time. The most accurate inventory
of wetlands was conducted in 1989/90 by the National Wetland Inventory (NWI). However, there is no
direct comparison in an older or more recent time period using the NWI methodology. The precision of
data collected in the USGS NLCD, which is available in the years 1976, 1992, 2001 and 2006, has improved
Page 7 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
dramatically in recent years, particularly since 1976. Therefore, the amount of wetlands in the NLCD for
years 1992 and 2011 were compared in the watershed. According to the NLCD datasets, the acreage of
wetlands in the Upper Tar River Basin (8-digit HUC 03020101) decreased by 1.2 percent between 1992
and 2011.
4.1.1.2. Water Quality Issues in Watershed
In the 1980's, public attention was drawn to the Tar -Pamlico River Basin's environmental problems.
Excessive algal growth, low oxygen levels, and increasing numbers of diseased and dying fish suggested a
decline in water quality (Tar Pamlico 2013). Suspected contributions include municipal sewer and treatment
plants that are discharging wastewater into rivers and streams. Nonpoint sources, such as farmland, timber
operations, and urban areas, were also contributing to excessive amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus. A set
of regulations, jointly known as the Tar -Pamlico nutrient strategy, was promulgated in 2000-2001 to
regulate sources of nutrient pollution in the basin including wastewater, stormwater, and agricultural
nutrient sources (NC DEQ 2017). These regulations also protect riparian buffers, mandate that
professionals that apply fertilizer attend training, and require stormwater management.
Although the entire Tar -Pamlico River Basin is classified as a Nutrient Sensitive Water (NSW), the two
primary water quality concerns in the Upper Tar River Subbasin (8-digit HUC 03020101) are fecal coliform
(FC) bacteria and turbidity. The NCDEQ monitors nine Ambient Monitoring System (AMS) stations in the
subbasin. Turbidity is often associated with excessive streambed sedimentation which can reduce fish
survival and growth rates by choking spawning beds, harm food sources, reduce cover from prey and high
temperature refuges by filling in pools, and reduce habitat complexity in streams (NC DWQ 2011).
Contamination by the fecal material of humans or other warm-blooded animals results in FC bacteria in
aquatic environments. Contamination from FC bacteria may occur from point and nonpoint sources of
human and animal waste.
The region's historical land cover change from the loss of longleaf pine and bottomland hardwood forests
to agriculture and silviculture has posed water quality threats to the watershed. Hydrologic modifications
such as shorter time of concentrations, decreases in infiltration and evapotranspiration rates have most likely
altered the watershed's natural runoff characteristics. The increase in runoff rates has the potential to carry
more pollutants, thus higher potential for impaired waters within the watershed, such as the ones listed
above.
4.1.2. Wildlife
4.1.2.1. Historical Losses of Wildlife Habitat
Southeastern Coastal Plain pine woodlands and associated wetlands are some of the most diverse
communities in temperate North America, with many endemic flora and fauna. However, post European
settlement disturbance and changing land use in the region has eliminated this ecosystem from more than
95 percent of the areas in which it was found (Mitchell and Duncan 2009). Coastal Plain ecosystems were
modified by early settlers for agriculture, timber harvest and to support waterway travel. Since settlement,
some agricultural practices have continued in the basin, while some areas have reforested. A loblolly pine
(Pinus taeda) closed canopy ecosystem has largely replaced the historic longleaf pine (Pinus palustris)
savannah, open canopy ecosystem, which is heavily influenced by human alteration (i.e. suppression) of
the fire regime. Biological diversity in these areas often decreases as a result (Mitchell and Duncan 2009).
Post -European settlement, disturbance, and conversion of land use in the region impacted bottomland
hardwood forests that supported high levels of diversity in both the flora and fauna (USEPA 20I2). Since
settlement, bottomland hardwood forests have been altered by the timber industry and, most substantially,
conversion to agricultural land uses. Increased urbanization, hydrologic modification, and land conversion
contribute to pollutant delivery to habitats that support threatened and endangered aquatic species.
The Upper Tar River Subbasin supports a surviving population of the federally protected and endemic Tar
River Spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana). Land -use change, watershed fragmentation by impoundments,
and eroded sediments have greatly diminished Tar River Spinymussel habitat. The surviving populations
Page 8 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
are can be found in five short sections of the Tar River and its tributaries and nowhere else in the world.
Table 3 lists the federally listed threatened and endangered species for the basin, adapted from the USFWS
Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) online screening tool and the USFS county list.
Table 3. List of Federally Endangered or Threatened Species in the Upper Tar River Basin
Common Name Latin Name
Status
WILDLIFE SPECIES
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucoce halus)
Recovery
Red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Endangered
AQUATIC SPECIES
Tar River Spinymussel Elli do steinstansana
Endangered
Yellow Lance Elli do lanceolate
Endangered
4.2. 10-DIGIT HUC - SWIFT CREEK
The Mitigation Project is located in the Swift Creek Watershed (10-digit HUC 0302010108) located in
Edgecombe County. Swift Creek is a major tributary of the Tar River that flows southeast from Henderson
in Vance County, through Warren, Franklin, Nash, and Edgecombe Counties until it meets the Tar River
just above Tarboro in Edgecombe County (Prince). The watershed has a drainage area of approximately
I I I square miles (71,004 acres).
The Mitigation Project straddles the transition line between two Level IV Ecoregions: The Rolling Coastal
Plain (65m) and the Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces (65p). The Rolling Coastal Plan is a
productive agriculture region that has better drained soils than the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (Griffith,
et al). The Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces can be described as a riverine ecoregion that
provides important wildlife corridors and habitat. It consists of oak -dominated bottomland hardwood
forests and river swamp forests (Griffith, et al).
4.2.1. Water Quality
4.2.1.1. Historical Changes of Aquatic Resources in Watershed
A history of land use change and disturbance has had a major impact on aquatic resources in the
Southeastern Plains region of the Carolinas including severe erosion and gullying, excessive sediment
loadings, lack of sufficient woody debris, stream channelization and channel/bank instability. Land use
changes, including agriculture, silviculture, and urban development, continue to influence aquatic resources
in the watershed. The status of the federally protected Tar River Spinymussel and Yellow Lance highlights
the historic and continued impacts to aquatic resources in the area. As of 2006, the Tar River Spinymussel
only occupied about 1 percent of its probable historic range (Wunsche 2006). Water quality issues,
including agriculture and silviculture land use conversion, urban development, wastewater, eroded
sediments, and stormwater discharge, and watershed fragmentation by impoundments has greatly
diminished Tar River Spinymussel and Yellow Lance habitat.
The surviving populations of the Tar River Spinymussel are now relegated to small, isolated tributaries
where the habitat has not been severely degraded, including the Swift Creek watershed. The reaches in
which the populations are found are isolated and highly susceptible to any factor that degrades water quality,
such as land use changes, chemical spills, and increases in runoff (Tar River Spiny Mussel 1985). In a 5-
year review of the progress of Tar River Spinymussel recovery, the USFWS recommends, among other
actions, continued work to establish conservation easements and to restore riparian buffers and in -stream
habitats, especially where the best remaining populations of the species are present (USFWS 2014).
Page 9 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
4.2.1.2. Water Quality Issues in Watershed
At the 8-digit HUC level, the Upper Tar River Subbasin (8-digit HUC 03020101) has water quality concerns
for nutrients, leading to a US EPA approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the basin. The Swift
Creek Watershed (I 0-digit HUC 0302010108) currently has two ambient water quality monitoring stations,
one of which is located downstream of the Mitigation Project. This watershed is a priority for
implementation of nonpoint source Best Management Practices (BMPs) for agricultural runoff and
stormwater control, as well as buffer enhancement and erosion and sediment control BMPs (NC DWQ
2011).
Potential water quality impacts in this watershed and the proposed Mitigation Project could come from
agricultural land uses in the uplands and areas adjacent to the Mitigation Project that make their way into
the floodplains. Agricultural land uses can contribute to common water quality issues, including high
nutrient loadings and fecal coliform bacteria. Agricultural land can be a source of fecal coliform bacteria
via runoff from grazing pastures, improper land application of animal wastes, livestock operations, and
livestock with access to waterbodies.
4.2.2. Wildlife
4.2.2.1. Historical Losses of Wildlife Habitat
The Swift Creek watershed is a threatened and endangered species protection priority area (NCDWQ 2011).
The most biologically diverse streams in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin occur within the Swift Creek
Subbasin and Fishing Creek Subbasins (Prince). Specifically, the Swift Creek Subbasin has been identified
as the most significant lotic creek ecosystem remaining along the Atlantic Seaboard (Alderman, et al.,
1993).
Swift Creek, which flows along the edge of the proposed Mitigation Project, is known to provide habitat
for a surviving population of the Tar River Spinymussel and Yellow Lance. The Tar River Spinymussel is
a rare and federally endangered species that is listed as a G1 status by NatureServe, meaning that it is
"Critically Imperiled". The Yellow Lance is was recently added to the List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife on May 3, 2018. Freshwater mussels feed by filtering plankton from the water column and are
extremely sensitive to hydrology alterations and water quality deterioration from sedimentation or toxic
substances (Alderman, et al., 1993). They are also vulnerable to increased stream isolation from riparian
buffer removal, exotic invasive species, and reductions in habitat diversity. Since these species have a
restricted distribution, any factor that degrades water or substrate quality within the watershed, such as land
use changes, chemical spills, and increases in agricultural and urban runoff, could threaten the species'
survival.
4.3. AREAS FOR WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT
After assessing the historical losses and concerns for water quality and wildlife in the aforementioned
watersheds, the following items have been identified as areas for improvement.
4.3.1. Water Quality Needs in the Watershed
Due to the historical hydrologic and ecological alterations in the basin, the presence of the critically
endangered Tar River Spinymussel and the impetus that USFWS has placed on protection of Tar River
Spinymussel habitat, there is a need for stream enhancement and protection and riparian protection to
improve hydrologic and ecological conditions. Improving streams at road crossings, maintaining stable
stream beds, and ensuring robust riparian areas to prevent pollutants and sedimentation can help protect Tar
River Spinymussel habitat. Land use practices in the watershed that threaten Swift Creek and its tributaries
include continued timber practices and agricultural practices in the headwaters of streams and potential
growth from the Rocky Mount area. The proposed project will convert approximately 65 acres of farmland
that drains directly to Swift Creek through existing ditches and headwater streams to forested ecosystems.
Additionally, the headwater streams contained within the Mitigation Project will be restored/enhanced
through Rosgen Priority 1 and Priority 4 restoration and enhancement methods to establish a more naturally
Page 10 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
occurring channel planform and riffle -pool sequences (Rosgen 1996) typical of Coastal Plain stream
ecosystems. Protection of the headwaters through stream and riparian improvement is important for
maintaining water quality downstream and meeting the goals of NCDEQ and EPA water quality standards.
4.3.2. Wildlife Needs in the Watershed
The most pressing wildlife need in the watershed is to protect habitat for surviving populations of the Tar
River Spinymussel that are present in the watershed. Existing populations survive in areas composed mainly
of woodlands, stable streambanks with extensive root systems, and limited pollution (NatureServe, 2017).
The USFWS recommends
"...working with partners to acquire land and establish conservation easements and restore forested
buffers and instream habitat. Initially, these efforts should be focused primarily on the best of the
remaining populations of the Tar River Spinymussel and areas targeted for population
augmentation and/or reintroduction of the species."
Riparian buffer management is essential to preventing stream isolation, capturing sediment and toxic
substances before they enter streams, and supplying adequate woody debris to the stream channel (Prince).
Establishing no -harvest zones directly adjacent to streams prevents greater -than -natural loss of canopy trees
and excessive large woody debris and sediment in the stream channel. A well -maintained riparian buffer
establishes an extensive root mat that provides soil stability and provides natural shade that protects from
stream insolation (Prince). Protection and enhancement actions at the Mitigation Project, which includes a
portion of Swift Creek, would mark progress on USFWS conservation goals.
4.3.3. Ecological (Physical, Chemical and Biological) Suitability and Technical Feasibility of the
Site to Meet Water Quality and Wildlife Habitat Needs in Watershed
Water quality issues resulting from agriculture, timber harvesting, and development have affected areas of
the watershed. The quality of existing stream and riparian areas makes this site a well -suited candidate to
fulfill USFWS Service goals of protecting Tar River Spinymussel habitat. Further, enhancement of stream
features such as culverts at road crossings, bank stabilizations and riparian areas will help to achieve the
habitat qualities that the Tar River Spinymussel requires by reducing fine sediment loads, maintaining bed
stability, preserving dissolved oxygen inducing features, and buffering the stream from potential pollutants.
Conservation easements at the site will also ensure that proper care is taken regarding land use on the
property adjacent to the stream habitat.
The TRLC is an organization that works to preserve important habitat in the Upper Tar River Basin. The
TRLC works to protect working farms and forests, wildlife habitat and natural areas, water quality and
stream buffers, and recreational open space through conservation easements and fee -simple land
acquisitions. The TRLC's goals include preserving intact habitat, protecting important blocks of farmland
and forest from development, and restoring stream buffers and floodplains through reforestation (TRLC
2017). The Mitigation Project would contribute to habitat protection, reduction of nutrient loading sources,
and establishment of buffers within the Upper Tar River Basin. The Mitigation Project also strengthens the
existing Nutrient Management Strategy and Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan within the Tar -
Pamlico Basin and helps meet USFWS, NCDENR, and TRLC goals within the Upper Tar River Basin.
4.3.4. Offsite Threats to Mitigation Efforts Constructed within the Mitigation Project Sites
It is possible that some timber management activities or maintenance of existing access roads could affect
the proposed Mitigation Project. Offsite threats that may affect wetland and water quality services
constructed at the Mitigation Project mainly include logging practices from adjacent silviculture and
agricultural activities. However, areas within the Tar -Pamlico are being addressed through NCDEQ and
NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) conservation management practices
that promote sound land management practices that aim to protect the success of the watershed.
Additionally, measures to limit any off -site impacts that may adversely affect the Mitigation Project will
certainly be taken into consideration before implementation.
Page 11 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
5. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN
5.1. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Wetland and stream mitigation activities within the Mitigation Project are expected to provide improved
water quality in the Swift Creek watershed, improved hydrology in the restored, enhanced, and preserved
stream channels and adjacent wetlands, and improved ecological benefits on -site and downstream.
Expected ecological uplift objectives are detailed in Table 4.
5.1.1. Mitigation Project Objectives
The proposed Mitigation Project will provide numerous ecological and water quality benefits within the
Upper Tar River Subbasin (8-digit HUC 03020101), Swift Creek Watershed (10-digit HUC 0302010108)
and the Inner Coastal Plain ecoregion. The Swift Creek watershed is primarily rural and agricultural with
some industrial use. Streams and wetlands in the inner coastal plain of North Carolina have been heavily
impacted as part of historical silviculture and agriculture land management practices. The on -going and
future potential threat of these practices is likely to impact terrestrial and aquatic habitats and disrupt habitat
corridors.
The Mitigation Project proposes to protect approximately 160 acres in perpetuity and further expand the
conservation efforts of the TRLC within the Tar River and Swift Creek watersheds. The primary goals of
the proposed Mitigation Project wila lyiriclud .
• Provide mitigation credits 't�Zoffset pacts at the CCX Intermodanal and Line of Road
Improvements project, incluStream Mitigation Units, 55.81 Wetla d Mitigation Units, and
43.12 acres of Stream Buffer Uits.
• Protection of approximately 63 - 1 iles) of preserved and restored
streams through the establishment of conservation easements.
• Preservation of approximately 35 acres of mature bottomland hardwood wetlands along Swift Creek.
Restoration and Enhancement of approximately 17.0 acres of converted wetlands through hydrologic
and hydraulic modification of the existing groundwater table.
• Restoration and Enhancement of headwater, intermittent, and perennial stream channels that have been
severely altered through historic dredging, to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality
to receiving waters.
• Restoration of approximately 200-foot buffers along proposed stream restoration/enhancement
corridors.
• Provide ecological benefits to address water quality impairments and hydrologic modifications, within
the Swift Creek watershed.
The primary goals for the Mitigation Site will be addressed through the following objectives:
• Promote wetland hydrology by raising channelized stream beds and filling drainage ditches;
• Plant wetland areas with native tree species to restore the natural vegetative communities;
• Reconstruct stream channels to have the appropriate slope, planform, and cross -sectional geometry for
the region of the Coastal Plain in which the project is located;
• Size reconstructed stream channels to inundate adjacent floodplains and wetlands frequently;
• Stabilize stream banks using bioengineering, natural channel design techniques, and grading to reduce
bank angles and bank height;
• Install in -stream structures and woody debris to promote aeration of water, create habitat, and influence
the creation of bed forms commonly found in sand bed channels;
• Restore riparian buffer areas with native tree species to stabilize channels, filter flood flows and runoff,
and supplement wetland plantings; and
• Remove a large acreage of land from agricultural production within the Mitigation Project to further
improving water quality.
Page 12 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Table 4 provides the estimated ecological benefits offered by the proposed Mitigation Project to
water quality, hydrology and habitat.
Table 4. Objectives for the Mitigation Project
Water Quality Benefits
Accomplished B
Vegetative enhancement is proposed for disturbed wetlands and
stream buffers to minimize erosion on the adjacent slopes.
Stabilization of the adjacent wetlands and buffers is expected to
Sediment Reduction
reduce sediment loss and provide for a stable healthy stream and
wetland systems. Sediment reduction will be achieved through the
restriction of intensive agricultural practices from proposed upland
buffer areas, which have resulted in historic land disturbance and
localized erosion.
Benefit will be achieved through protection, enhancement, and
preservation of existing riparian vegetation and reestablishment of
200-foot buffer where agricultural use has encroached.
Agricultural activities are currently active within a large portion of
the Mitigation Project. Enhancement and preservation of these
areas will allow the floodplain of smaller UT's of Swift Creek to
continue to receive and filter runoff, thereby reducing nutrients and
sediment concentrations reaching aquatic resources. Additionally,
removal of the agricultural practices that provide a significant
Water quality
source for nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus in the
watershed will have a significant benefit to the watershed within
the Mitigation Project and Swift Creek. As such, benefit will be
achieved through the reduction of sediment loss with reforestation
and the stabilization of eroding ditch and stream banks. Protection
and enhancement of riparian vegetation will benefit surface water
and groundwater quality by minimizing nitrogen and phosphorus
concentrations in runoff from surrounding agricultural fields
within the Mitigation Project, improving surface soil structure to
facilitate groundwater infiltration, and protecting groundwater
discharge areas along riparian corridors.
Hydrological Function Goals
Accomplished B
Preserve existing floodplain functions by eliminating the threat of
future silviculture and agricultural operations which would most
likely require the construction of logging roads to access portions
of the property. Protection of the existing vegetation will also
Floodplain function
allow the floodplain Swift Creek to function naturally providing
benefits to water quality and habitat corridors. Floodplain
functional uplift will be accomplished by utilizing natural stream
design to restore and enhance stream bank heights to further
connect streams with their floodplain
Enhancement of buffer areas, including floodplain wetlands, will
Water Storage
store more water during precipitation event than under current
drainage conditions, thus, reducing flooding in the watershed.
Hydraulic Function Goals
Restoration and enhancement of riparian buffers will provide
Surface Water Storage and
additional floodplain connectivity and volume. They are also
Detention
expected to improve their storage capacity to detain surface water
associated with large storm events.
Page 13 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Increased residence time for floodwaters provided by enhancing
and preserving riparian wetlands will maintain the volume of water
Subsurface water retention
available for local aquifers. Additionally, the filling of ditches
within the Mitigation Project will restore the historic ground water
table and natural movement of subsurface flow.
Biological Function Goals
Accomplished B
Protecting the existing properties, which are crossed by multiple
Habitat for macroinvertebrates and
drainages in the wetland depressions, will preserve valuable
fish
floodplain habitat vital to the native macroinvertebrates and fish
that inhabit the Miti ation Project site.
Preservation ofbottomland hardwood ecosystems, which are under
Vegetative Habitat Protection
threat from silviculture practices maintains the presence of native
species and diverse ecosystems that have historically been stripped
from the Swift Creek watershed.
The establishment of the Mitigation Project and associated
Habitat Corridor Protection
conservation easements, with its proximity to previously conserved
lands (Figure 2 in Appendix A), will preserve natural travel
corridors for nativespecies and reduce habitat fraEnentation.
Long Term Protection of
The proposed protective mechanisms for lands within the
Ecological Resources
Mitigation Project is expected to protect the proposed ecological
benefits in perpetuity.
Conservation Goals
Accomplished B
Establishment of the proposed conservation and development
restriction easements. Loss and fragmentation of habitat have been
identified as a major threat to many of the species listed as
Reduction of Habitat
threatened and endangered in North Carolina. The proposed
Fragmentation
Mitigation Project in conjunction with the Stated Goals of State
and Federal Agencies and the TRLC will provide a potential spring
board for further conservation projects within the Swift Creek
Watershed.
5.2. MITIGATION PROJECT LOCATION AND SELECTION
5.2.1. Directions to the Project Site
The proposed Mitigation Project is located near the Town of Leggett, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
along NC-33 just west of its intersection with NC-97 and approximately 20 miles east Interstate 95 (Figure
1 in Appendix A). Access to the Mitigation Project is located directly off of NC-33 via a gravel road.
5.2.2. Site Selection
An extensive process was undertaken to locate a suitable PRM plan site that meets and adheres to the
USACE 33 CFR Parts 325 and 332 and EPA 40 CFR Part 230. A watershed approach focusing on the
Upper Tar River watershed was utilized to search for the ideal PRM site to satisfy the compensatory wetland
and stream mitigation requirement for impacts associated with the CCX Site while simultaneously
furthering the conservation goals of TRLC and others. Based on the results of this analysis and the site
selection process, it was determined that a large contiguous area with opportunities to protect a valuable
aquatic resource and expand on the existing conservation efforts by the State and private conservation
organizations would be preferred.
Page 14 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
The Mitigation Project was selected because it meets the needs of the watershed and proposes to protect a
significant portion of the Swift Creek watershed, which is a priority for both federal and state agencies and
the TRLC. The Mitigation Project is proposed as compensatory mitigation to off set unavoidable impacts
to jurisdictional wetlands due to the construction of the CCX Terminal and Line of Road Improvements
Project. In accordance with the most current federal mitigation regulations (Compensatory Mitigation for
Losses of Aquatic Resources; Final Rule dated April 10, 2008) primary consideration was given toward
identifying mitigation sites that: 1) supported a watershed restoration approach, 2) provided for In -Kind
mitigation, and 3) existed within the 8-digit HUC and Ecoregion.
5.2.3. Resource Equivalency
5.2.3.1. Comparison of Waters of the U.S.
The jurisdictional waters of the U.S. proposed for impact within the CCX Terminal and Line of Road
Improvements Project are a mix of headwater forest, basin wetland, floodplain pool, hardwood forest, and
riverine swam sed project will impact a total of 6.87 acres of jurisdictional wetlands.
ApproximateV_&T�
of RPWs as ell as 3.89 acres (169,266 sq. ft.) of Zone 1 and 2.54 acres (110,770
sq. ft.) of Zonbuffer will be impacted by the project.
The jurisdictional waters associated with the Swift Creek Mitigation Project site include approximately 63
acres of palustrine, forested wetlands classified as a mix of headwater forest and bottomland hardwood
wetlands. On the southwestern portion of the site, there is an area of riverine swamp forest along Swift
Creek and White Oak Swamp. Additionally, there are approximately 5,518 linear feet of streams consisting
of five unnamed tributaries. Both sites, CCX Terminal and Line of Road Improvements Project and the
Swift Creek Mitigation Project, are located within Upper Tar subbasin (8-digit HUC 0302101) of the Tar
Pamlico river basin. The Mitigation Project is approximately nine miles east of the proposed CCX Terminal
and Line of Road Improvements Project.
The Mitigation Project will provide an excellent opportunity for the preservation, enhancement, and
restoration of headwater forest, bottomland hardwood, and riverine swamp forest wetlands, within the Swift
Creek watershed. Wetlands slated for preservation are generally high -quality wetlands which will offset
impacts to medium and high -quality wetlands.
5.3. BASELINE CONDITIONS
5.3.1. Physiography, Topography, and Land Use
The Mitigation Project lies within the Southeastern Floodplain and Low Terraces ecoregion of the Coastal
Plain Physiographic province. The area is referred to as the inner Coastal Plain and is characterized by
more relief than the outer Coastal Plain. Elevations range from approximately 25 to 600 feet above sea
level. The Coastal Plain largely consists of marine sedimentary rocks including sand, clay, and limestone.
This area is the largest geologic belt in the State and formed through the deposition of estuarine and marine
sediments approximately 100 to 140 million years ago. The underlying sediments of the Mitigation Project
are from the Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation Undivided. The Yorktown Formation is described
as fossiliferous clay with varying amounts of fine -graded sand, bluish gray, shell material commonly
concentrated in lenses and is found mainly in area north of the Neuse River. The Duplin Formation is
described as shelly, medium to course -grained sand, sandy marl, and limestone, bluish gray, mainly in the
area south of Neuse River (NCGS 1985).
The Mitigation Project has been predominantly utilized for agricultural uses, such as row crop production,
throughout its history as evidence by the 1954 historical aerial (Figure 6a). The surrounding area is
predominately rural and has low development pressure at this time. Overall, the project watershed is
approximately 94.6% agriculture, 4.2% forest and 1.2% rangeland based on the North Carolina GAP land
use classification using 2013 and 2016 aerial photography (McKerrow 2003).
Page 15 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
5.3.2. Soils
Soils within the Mitigation Site have been mapped by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) (USDA 2010) and are displayed on Figure 8 in Appendix
A. Eleven soil series are mapped within the Mitigation Project: Altavista fine sandy loam, Conetoe loamy
sand, Dogue fine sandy loam, Norfolk loamy sand, Rains fine sandy loam, Roanoke loam, Tarboro loamy
sand, Wagram loamy sand, Wehadkee silt loam, and Wickham sandy loam.
Table 5 shows the soil map units found within the Mitigation Site.
Table 5. Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils
Map Unit Name
Unit Symbol
H dric Rating
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
AaA
Predominantly Non-H dric
Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Cell
Non-H dric
Do ue fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
D a
Predominantly Non-H dric
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NoA
Predominantly Non-Hydric
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
NoB
Non-H dric
Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
Southern Coastal Plain
RaA
Hydric
Roanoke loam
Ro
H dric
Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
TaB
Non-H dric
Wagram loaniy sand, 0 to 6 2ercent slopes
WaB
Predominantly Non-H dric
Wehadkee silt loam
Wh
Predominantly H dric
Wickham sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes
NoA
Predominantly Non-H dric
5.3.3. Valley Classification
The Mitigation Project is located within the Upper Coastal Plain physiographic province and the
surrounding fluvial landforms are typical of this region. The Mitigation Project is bisected by ridge
separating an upper flat terrace and a lower terrace associated with the floodplain of White Oak Swamp and
Swift Creek, a tributary of the Tar River. The upper terrace is typical of coastal plain headwater systems
and maintains a gradual slope towards Swift Creek. Modifications of the drainage patterns within the
Mitigation Project's upper terrace are apparent and likely occurred prior to the 1950s when the site was
converted for agricultural use. Extensive ditching throughout the upper terrace was utilized to drain
historically wet features based on the NRCS soils information and headwater wetland systems. The
topography left today exhibits shallow valleys and with gentle slopes draining towards the Swift Creek
floodplain for the primary drainage within the Mitigation Project (Tributary A) as shown on Figure 7 in
Appendix A. Based on this information, there is no apparent classification for the upper terrace drainages
in the Rosgen Valley classifications (Rosgen 1996).
The lower terrace is associated with the floodplain of White Oak Swamp and Swift Creek and is a fairly
broad flat floodplain crossed by sand hills that lie parallel to Swift Creek. This portion of the site is most
similar to a valley type X — very broad and gentle slopes associated with extensive floodplains — according
to the Rosgen valley classification (Rosgen 1996).
5.3.4. Jurisdictional Determination
Waters of the U.S., including streams and wetlands, are defined by 33 CFR Part 328.3 et al. and are
protected by Section 404 and other applicable sections of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Impacts to
these regulated resources are administered and enforced by the USACE Wilmington District as well as
other federal and state government agencies.
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions (Wood E&I) personnel, including Professional Wetland
Scientists and Licensed Professional Soil Scientists, evaluated the potentially jurisdictional waters
using the Routine On -Site Determination Method as defined in the USACE Wetland Delineation
Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain regional supplement
Page 16 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
(Environmental Laboratory 2010). This technique uses a multi -parameter approach which requires
positive evidence of three criteria: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Areas
exhibiting wetland characteristics within the Mitigation Project were considered potentially
jurisdictional waters. The landward limits of these wetlands were acquired in the field via Global
Positioning System (GPS) technology using a hand-held GPS device. The field evaluation also
included an assessment of the wetlands within the Mitigation Project site using the North Carolina
Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM) as outlined in the NC WAM User Manual (Version 4.1)
(NC Wetland Functional Assessment Team 2010), effective October 2010. The field evaluation was
conducted on April 26 and 27, 2017. A request for a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) has
been completed and was submitted to the USACE, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, to the limits of
regulatory jurisdiction on the Mitigation Project and is attached in Appendix H.
Table 6. Evaluated Jurisdictional Features within the Mitigation Project
FEATURE NAME
FEATURE TYPE
ACREAGE/LINEAR FEET
Wetland No. 2
Jurisdictional Wetland
2.83 Acres
Wetland No. 6
Jurisdictional Wetland
57.09 Acres
Wetland No. 7
Jurisdictional Wetland
3.17 Acres
UT - A
Intermittent/Perennial RPW
2,951 Feet
UT - B
Perennial RPW
981 Feet
UT - I
Intermittent/Perennial RPW
477 Feet
UT - -
Ephemeral RPW
598 Feet
UT. -2 =
Ephemeral RPW
151 Feet
Total
Jurisdictional Netlands
--63 ac./--�5,518 LF
Ditch 1
830 Feet
Ditch 2
673 Feet
Ditch 3
700 Feet
Ditch 4
344 Feet
Ditch 5
1,186 Feet
Ditch 6
1,453 Feet
Ditch 8
291 Feet
Ditch 9
276 Feet
Ditch 28
2,139 Feet
Ditch 29
247 Feet
Ditch 30
212 Feet
Ditch 31
454 Feet
Ditch 32
377 Feet
Ditch 33
160 Feet
Total Ditches
9,432 LF
Uplands
—133 Acres
Total Mitigation Project Site
—196.5 Acres
5.3.4.1. Description of Jurisdictional Features
Wetland 2 is a jurisdictional headwater forest wetland, comprised of palustrine forested areas and located
near the northern boundary of the Mitigation Project area. These wetlands are dominated by red maple
(Ater rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). Two
drainages (UT -A and UT-B) are associated with the wetland complex encompassing Wetlands 2, 3, and 4.
Wetland 6 is a large jurisdictional bottomland hardwood forest wetland, comprised of palustrine forested,
scrub shrub, and emergent wetland areas and located within the southern half of the Mitigation Project area.
Scrub shrub and emergent wetland areas, most impounded, occur within the northern portion of this large
wetland complex. Portions of this wetland complex are hydrologically influenced by North American
beaver (Castor canadensis) activity. The vegetation includes red maple, sweetgum, sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), river birch (Betula nigra), wax myrtle (Morella
cerifera), possumhaw (Viburnum nudum), and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense). Black willow (Salix
Page 17 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
nigra) is also present in depressional pockets. Dense pockets of Japanese stilt -grass (Microstegium
vimineum) occur in the groundstory of some of these areas. Giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea) and ferns
also occupy the groundstory. A riverine swamp forest wetland occurs within the floodplain of Swift Creek
in the southern portion of Wetland 6. This riverine swamp forest wetland drains into Swift Creek and White
Oak Swamp. The vegetation includes red maple, sweetgum, river birch, willow oak (Quercus phellos),
cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and American hornbeam (Carpinus
caroliniana). Multiple drainages are associated with Wetland 6, including UT -A and UT-B within the
project area.
Wetland 7 is a jurisdictional bottomland hardwood forest wetlands, comprised of palustrine forested
wetland areas and located within the southern half of the Mitigation Project area. The vegetation includes
species that are common to Wetland 6.
Stream UT -A is a jurisdictional perennial relatively permanent water (RPW) and is classified as a 1" order
stream. Stream UT -A flows into Wetland 6, and ultimately into Swift Creek. UT -A becomes a 2nd order
stream after the confluence with UT-B. The stream originates east of Wetland 2.
Stream UT-B is a jurisdictional perennial RPW and is classified as a lIt order stream. Stream UT-B flows
into UT -A, and ultimately into Swift Creek. The stream originates at the end of UT -I along the northern
boundary line of the Mitigation Project area.
Stream UT -I is a jurisdictional intermittent/perennial RPW and is classified as 11' order stream. UT -I
originates south of Wetland 2 and flows into UT-B, before flowing into UT -A and then reaching Swift
Cree
reams UT-K-1 d UT-K-2 are jurisdictional ephemeral RPWs and are classified as 1"' order streams.
B treams VT
and UT-1-2 flow off property into White Oak Swamp before reaching Swift Creek.
The stream ate within Wetland 6.
Ditches: There are a total of approximately 14 ditches located within the Mitigation Project area and
encompassing over 9,432 linear feet. Ditches are located in both wetland areas and upland areas and vary
between ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial RPW characteristics.
5.3.5. Existing Plant Communities
Wetland plant communities within the Mitigation Project site were characterized using the NC WAM
method. Two predominant wetland plant communities exist within the site: bottomland hardwood forest
and riverine swamp forest. The Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina (4`h Approximation)
(Schafale 2012) was utilized to characterize the existing upland plant communities within the Mitigation
Project area. Three predominant upland plant communities exist within the site: mixed hardwood forest,
pine forest and mixed pine -hardwood forest. Botanical taxonomic nomenclature presented below is in
accordance with Flora of the southern and mid Atlantic states (Weakley 2015).
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
The bottomland hardwood forest community occurs throughout the large forested tract in the southern half
of the Mitigation Project site. The canopy and shrub strata include red maple, sweetgum, sycamore, green
ash, river birch, wax myrtle, possumhaw, and Chinese privet. Black willow is also present in depressional
pockets. Dense pockets of Japanese stilt -grass occur in the groundstory stratum of some of these areas.
Giant cane and ferns also occupy the groundstory. Lizard's tail (Saururus cernuus) and soft rush (Juncus
effusus) are present in depressional pockets.
Mixed Hardwood Forest
The mixed hardwood forest community also occurs throughout the large forested tract in the southern half
of the site. The canopy and shrub strata comprise a broad assemblage of species: water oak (Quercus
nigra), sweetgum, mockernut hickory (Carya alba), sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica), black cherry (Prunus serotina), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), winged elm (Ulmus alata),
American beech (Fagus grandifolia), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginianus), flowering dogwood
Page 18 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
(Cornus florida), American holly (Ilex opaca), wax myrtle, and blueberry (Yaccinium spp.). The
groundstory stratum includes muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia),
poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), yellow jasmine (Gelsemium sempervirens), blackberry (Rubus sp.),
panic grasses (Panicum spp.), broom sedge (Andropogon virginicus), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica), Virginia -creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), wood -sorrel (Oxalis spp.), and violets (Viola
spp.).
Mixed Pine -Hardwood Forest
The mixed pine -hardwood forest community includes many of the plant species that are common to the
canopy, shrub and groundstory strata ofthe mixed hardwood forest, with the addition of loblolly pine (Pinus
taeda) as a canopy and subcanopy associate. These areas occur throughout the large forested areas in the
southern half of the mitigation area.
Pine Forest
Loblolly pine stands are not a dominant community within the southern half of the site. However, some of
these stands contain pine trees with values of diameter at breast height (DBH) that range from 8 to 16
inches. The understory includes species that are common to the nixed hardwood forest and mixed pine -
hardwood forest communities. No clear -cuts or planted pine plantations occur within the Mitigation Project
area.
Agricultural Land Use
Agricultural fields occupy a large portion of the northern half of the site. Some of the fields are fallow,
while others have been recently planted with corn.
5.3.6. Baseline Stream Conditions
Existing conditions assessments were conducted by Palustrine Group and Wood E&I personnel between
March and April 2017. Visual assessments were conducted on each of the stream/ditch systems listed
below is Table 7.
Table 7. Stream Summary Information
Feature Name
UT - A
Existing Length (ft)
6,761
Valley Sloe ftlft)
0.001 = 0.009
Drainage Area
—339
(Acres)
Perennial (P) or
I/P
Intermittent I
Existing Conditions
G5c (Upper)
Rosgen
C5 (Lower)
Classification
FEMA
None
Classification
5.3.7. Stream Geomorphology — Proposed Restoration Reaches
The existing conditions channel morphology assessments were performed to document the current
condition of the stream and adjacent ditch features within the Mitigation Project. The existing conditions
assessments included on -site data gathering and visual stability assessment and review of historic aerial
photography, and available LiDAR data gathered obtained from the North Carolina Flood Mapping
Program. Based upon review of the historic aerials, extensive modification of stream and wetland features
was conducted prior to 1954 to deepen and straighten existing stream features, which in some cases appear
to have been relocated outside or away from their natural valley drastically altering the historic drainage
Page 19 of 57

Swift Creek — Pennittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
patterns of the Mitigation Project. Additionally, wetlands were drained through the construction of ditches
which drain into currently existing jurisdictional features. As with most historic farm sites in eastern North
Carolina, the ditches/channels are very straight with little sinuosity and typically very deep to effectively
lower the surrounding ground water table, which aids in agricultural production operations.
The majority of the identified stream features within the Mitigation Project have been channelized, as
previously discussed, and remain straight and very deep with relatively step side slopes (1:1 — 1.5:1).
Typical bankfull indicators used to estimate bankfull stage were indistinguishable in the majority of existing
stream channels, however best guess practices were utilized in conjunction with predicted channel
dimensions from the North Carolina State University published regional curves for the Coastal Plain. The
estimated bankfull indicators were utilized to determine the appropriate Rosgen Classifications stated above
in Table 7.
Stream UT -A is located completely within the Mitigation Project except for where it enters Swift Creek.
Stream UT -A is characterized as a small stream that is typically driven by the groundwater conditions and
stormwater runoff. UT -A is approximately 6,761 linear feet and flows south along the western portion of
the site and picks up stormwater and groundwater flow from existing ditches (Ditch 1 and 2) that drain NC-
33 and adjacent agricultural fields. Along its flow path it picks up additional ditches (Ditch 3 and 4) that
drain the western portion of the Mitigation Project and eventually flows down the floodplain terrace and
into the floodplain of Swift Creek. Once it enters the floodplain of Swift Creek historic, a portion of the
stream is currently dammed by the presence of an existing access road that was constructed above grade.
The watershed for UT -A is approximately 339 acres but is primarily driven by ground water and stormwater
runoff in its upper reaches. UT -A is currently routed through Ditch 6 which is inundated for most of the
year except during times of low water in the surrounding wetland system (Wetland 6). Downstream of the
existing access road UT -A has undergone historic modification through channelization and the adjacent
spoil piles can still be seen as remnants of the original dredging of the stream system. In the upper portions
of UT -A, no vegetation is located within riparian zone and row crops are typically planted directly adjacent
to the top of both channel banks. The riparian buffer on the lower portions of UT -A, once it enters the
Swift Creek floodplain, are characterized as bottomland hardwood forest and riverine swamp forest, typical
of the NC Coastal Plain and consist predominately of mature hardwood species. Preliminary estimates of
the bankfull stage yielded width to depth ratios of 0.8 (upper) to 7.5 (lower) and entrenchment ratios of 1.3
(upper) to 33 (lower). The average slope calculated off of available LiDAR of the UT -A is 0.009 ft/ft in
the upper portion and 0.001 ft/ft in the floodplain of Swift Creek. Sinuosity for the entire reach ranges from
1.0 (upper) to 1.2 (lower). The Rosgen Classification that most closely describes UT -A in the upper
portions is a G5c and a C5 in the lower portions.
5.3.8. Wildlife
The wildlife within the Mitigation Project area comprises common forest -dwelling species of mammals,
avifauna and herpetofauna. Some of these species may frequent the open areas of the site including the
agricultural fields and the edges of these fields.
The most common big game mammal observed within the site is the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus). Small game species that occur on the site include eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus jloridanus),
raccoon (Procyon lotor), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), wood duck (Aix sponsa), and eastern wild
turkey (Meleagris gallapavo).
Common species of non -game wildlife observed or detected (sign) during early 2017 site reconnaissance
include Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), great blue heron
(Ardea herodias), black racer (Coluber constrictor), water snake (Nerodia sp.), southern cricket frog (Acris
gryllus), upland chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata), and southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala).
Additional bird species that are likely to occur within the site are sharp -shinned hawk (Accipter striatus),
Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii), red -shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus), barred owl (Strix varia), great
horned owl (Bubo virginianus), turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), black vulture (Coragyps atratus), pileated
woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus), red bellied woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus), downy woodpecker
(Picoides pubescens), American robin (Turdus migratorius), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos),
Page 20 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), eastern phoebe (Sayornis phoebe), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura),
northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), eastern kingbird (Tyrannus tyrannus), Carolina chickadee (Pares
carolinensis), tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor), Carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus), eastern bluebird
(Sialia sialis), white eyed vireo (Vireo griseus), solitary vireo (Vireo solitaries), northern parula (Setophaga
americana), and yellow -ramped warbler (Dendroica coronata), and northern mockingbird (Mimus
polyglottos).
5.3.9. Protected Species
5.3.9.1. Federally Listed Species
Plants and animals listed as federally threatened and endangered are protected under the Endangered
Species Act (P.L. 92-205) (ESA) which is administered and enforced by the USFWS- Region 4. The bald
eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is federally protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
(BGEPA) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). This section documents the results of a literature
and database search and limited on -site reconnaissance to determine the likelihood that federally
endangered or threatened species and the bald eagle will be impacted by the proposed mitigation activities
on the site.
Wood E&I conducted a records search to identify documented federally protected species (threatened or
endangered) and federal Species of Concern which have elemental occurrences in Edgecombe County
and/or vicinity of the Mitigation Project area. The records search was also conducted to determine if
designated critical habitat may be within or near the Mitigation Project area. As specifically related to the
NCNHP database search, the query of elemental occurrences encompassed a one -mile radius of the
Mitigation Project site boundary. Federal and state databases reviewed for the project are:
• NCNHP database(hgps://www.ncnhp.org/data/species-community-search. Website accessed
December 5, 2018.)
• USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaQ database (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service,
Information for Planning and Consultation database. https://ecos.fws.Wv/jpac/. Website accessed
December 5, 2018.)
• USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)
• Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office website
(hiips://www.fws. ovg /raleigh/species/cn ylist/edgecombe.htm_l. Website accessed December 5,
2018.)
Wood E&I also conducted a general field reconnaissance of the Mitigation Project area in April 2017. The
purpose of the reconnaissance was to evaluate the plant communities within the Mitigation Project area
with respect to the quantity and quality of habitat and the opportunity for utilization (potential for
occurrence) by threatened and endangered species.
No federally listed, threatened or endangered, animal or plant species were observed during the field
reconnaissance. The quality of the existing habitat in the entire project site is presumed to be less than
suitable, or not present, for the listed species with a potential for occurrence in Edgecombe County.
Table 2 presents the results of the records search for Edgecombe County. Known habitats used by the
species listed in Table 2 were compared with the habitats found within the Mitigation Project area to
determine the potential for occurrence of each species. The potential, or likelihood, of occurrence, as listed
in Table 2, was based on the following factors:
• A comparison of the known habitats used by these species
• The habitats (if present) within the project site
• The quantity, quality, and proximity of these habitats
• Observations of these species or their sign during field reconnaissance
The likelihood of occurrence for listed species was rated as high, moderate, low or unlikely based on the
above criteria. The potential for listed species occurring within the Mitigation Project is presented in Table
8.
Page 21 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Table 8. Potential for occurrence of federally listed animal and plant species within the Mitigation
Site, Edgecombe County, North Carolina.
Common Name
(Scientific Name)
Federal Status
General Habitat Description
Potential for
Occurrence
Forested habitats for nesting and roosting, and
Bald eagle
Bald and Golden
expanses of shallow fresh or salt water for
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Eagle Protection
foraging. Nesting habitat generally consists of
Unlikely
Act
densely forested areas of mature trees that are
isolated from human disturbance.
Mature pine forests, specifically those with
longleaf pines averaging 80 to 120 years old and
loblolly pines averaging 70 to 100 years old. Pine
Red -cockaded woodpecker
trees with red -heart disease are preferred for cavity
(Picoides borealis)
Endangered
nesting. Suitable foraging habitat typically
Unlikely
exhibits sparse understory (minimal hardwood
regeneration). Fire (control burning) is important
in maintaining suitable foraging and nesting
habitat.
Relatively fast flowing, well -oxygenated,
Tar River spinymussel
circumneutral pH water in sites prone to
(Elliptio steinstansana)
Endangered
significant swings in water velocity, with a
Moderate
substrate comprised of relatively silt -free loose
gravel and/or coarse sand.
Clean, coarse to medium sand or gravel substrates
Yellow Lance
Endangered
at the end of stable sand and gravel bars of clean
Moderate
(Elliptio lanceolata)
moderate, flowing sites with high dissolved
oxygen content.
Notes: NCNHP List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina; USFWS IPaC; USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System
- Species Profiles; County list (USFWS Raleigh Ecological Services); NatureServe Explorer.
The results of the December 5, 2018, database search request to the NCNHP and the results of the USFWS
IPaC resource list search are included in Appendix 1. Each protected species identified in Table 8 is
discussed below.
The bald eagle was listed as endangered on March 11, 1967. The species was reclassified from endangered
to threatened throughout the lower 48 states on July 12, 1995. It was proposed to be removed from the
federal endangered species list on July 6, 1999. On July 9, 2007, the bald eagle was removed from the
endangered species list. Although no longer afforded protection by the ESA, the bald eagle is still protected
under the BGEPA and the MBTA, both of which protect bald eagles by prohibiting killing, selling or
otherwise harming eagles, their nests, or eggs. Habitats include riparian areas along the coast and near
major rivers, wetlands and reservoirs. Bald eagles typically nest in large, tall, open -topped pines typically
near large open water bodies. They feed primarily on fish, but will also take a variety of birds, mammals
and turtles. The portion of Swift Creek that is conterminous to the southern boundary of the Mitigation
Project area may provide a limited opportunity for foraging (fisheries) where the canopy of the riverine
swamp forest community does not overlap the creek. No eagle nests are known to occur within the area.
No eagles or their nests were observed during site reconnaissance. Based on these considerations, the
potential for occurrence was presumed to be unlikely for the bald eagle.
Page 22 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
In 1970, the red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) was officially listed as endangered by the USFWS. With
passage of the ESA in 1973, the RCW received the protection afforded listed species under the ESA. The
endangered status of the RCW primarily is due to four environmental factors that have been shown to limit
its numbers: (1) hardwood encroachment; (2) a shortage of suitable cavity trees; (3) loss and fragmentation
of habitat, and (4) demographic isolation. RCWs excavate cavities for roosting and nesting in living pines
and use living pines almost exclusively for foraging substrate, preferring longleaf pine when available.
RCWs require open pine woodlands and savannas with large old pines for nesting and roosting habitat (i.e.,
cavity trees). Cavity trees must be in open pine stands with little or no hardwood midstory and few or no
over -story hardwoods. Suitable nesting habitat consists of pine, pine -hardwood, and hardwood -pine stands
that contain pines 60 years in age or older and that are within 0.5 mile of suitable foraging habitat. Suitable
foraging habitat consists of a pine or pine -hardwood stand in which 50 percent or more of the dominant
trees are pines and the dominant pine trees are generally 30 years in age or older. The quality of existing
upland habitat on the Mitigation Project area is less than suitable, or not present, for foraging or cavity -
nesting. The hardwood dominant stands on the site do not constitute RCW habitat. The pine component
in the mixed pine -hardwood forest and pine forest communities does not contain old -age longleaf pine.
Although scattered openings occur within some areas of the upland habitat, the habitat is generally
unsuitable for foraging or cavity -nesting due to the presence of a well -established understory of hardwoods
and/or pines. Overall, the potential for occurrence of the RCW within the Mitigation Project area was
presumed to be unlikely.
Most of the freshwater mussel species known to occur in the U.S. are distributed in the southeast. The
dominant mussel species in Atlantic coastal streams is the introduced Asiatic clam (Corbicula fluminea),
but multiple native species reside in the larger perennial streams. The Swift Creek basin supports at least
nine rare mussel species: Tar River spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana), triangle floater (Alasmidonta
undulata), yellow lance (Elliptio lanceolata), Roanoke slabshell (Elliptio roanokensis), Atlantic pigtoe
(Fusconaia masoni), yellow lampmussel (Lampsilis cariosa), squawfoot (Strophitus undulatus), eastern
l ampmussel (Lampsilis radiata), and notched rainbow (Villosa constricta) (Prince). The Swift Creek basin
supports some of the most extensive populations of these species (Alderman, et al. 1993). The unnamed
tributaries within the site are warmwater streams dominated by sand (with silt along some reaches), which
have slow -flowing lower gradients. The federally endangered Tar River Spinymussel and Yellow Lance
are unlikely to occur in the unnamed tributaries within the project. The NCNHP database query results
included one reported element occurrence (EO) of the Tar River Spinymussel within a one -mile radius of
the Mitigation Project area (NCNHP 2017). This record (EO ID: 21437) was located in Swift Creek,
southeast and downstream of the site. The last observation date for this record was June 18, 1991. Overall,
the potential for occurrence of the Tar River Spinymussel and the Yellow Lance within the Mitigation
Project area was presumed to be moderate, but limited to its potential for occurrence solely within Swift
Creek.
5.3.9.2. State Species of Concern
The North Carolina State Endangered Species Act (G.S. 113-331 to 113-337) provides guidelines to protect
wildlife and plant species that have been determined to be of concern in the state (15A NCAC 10I .0102
Protection of Endangered/Threatened/Special Concern). These state listed endangered, threatened and
special concern species include those thought to have populations of declining, rare or unknown status other
than those listed under the federal ESA. While the state listed species are not protected by federal law, the
list provides a valuable tool for conservation measures and protection planning. Table 9 provides the state
listed species for Edgecombe County (February 2014) for which there may be suitable habitat within the
Mitigation Project area.
Page 23 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Table 9. Site Suitable, State Species of Concern for Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Documented
Common Name
State
County
General Habitat Description
Occurrence
(Scientific Nante)
Status'
Status2
within 1-mile
of Site,
Vertebrates
Open forest habitats of oak and pine where older,
cavity -filled trees are located. In the Coastal Plain,
Eastern Fox Squirrel
F Squirrel
longleaf pine or loblolly pine and oak woods, pine
(tern
s
Current
flatwoods and open borders of cypress swamps and
No
low thickets. Broken forest, scattered woods in
farmland and other half -wooded situations with nut
or cone bearing trees are present.
Man -created habitats, mainly in cleared nonriverine
Henslow's Sparrow
swamp and pocosin forest that are now maintained
(Ammodramus
SC
Current
in early succession by mowing (or burning).
No
henslowii)
Clearcut pocosins and other damp weedy fields
(breeding season only).
Grasshopper Sparrow
Prairie, old fields, open grasslands, cultivated fields,
(�lmmodramus
W5'
Current
and savanna. Most common on managed grassland
No
savannarun)
in the presence of clump -forming vegetation,
Loggerhead Shrike
Pastures and farmland, with thorny trees or shrubs or
(Lanius ludovicianus)
SC, W2
Current
barbed wire fences (for impaling prey). Sandy soil
No
areas are favored over wetter or more clay -like soils.
Streams, lakes, ponds, swamps, marshes, and
Hooded Merganser
estuaries. Winters mostly in freshwater but also
{Lophodytes
W3
Current
regularly in estuaries and sheltered bays. Nests
N o
cucullatus)
usually in tree cavities in forested regions near
water, often near fast -flowing streams, also forest
onds and lakes, flooded forest, riverside swamps.
Open, xeric habitats with well -drained, sandy or
Southern Hognose
sandy -loam soils such as sand ridges, stabilized
Snake
SC
Current
coastal sand dunes, pine flatwoods, mixed oak -pine
No
(Heterodon simus)
woodlands and forests, scrub oak woods, and oak
hammocks; also old fields and river floodplains.
Dwarf Salamander
{Eurycea
(Eur
SC
Current
Margins of ponds in pine forests or savannas,
No
quaPtata)
bottomland hardwood forests, and swamps.
Neuse River
Neuse and Tar drainages. Streams with relatively
Waterdog
SC
Current
high oxygen levels and water quality. Species can be
yes
(Necturus lewisi)
found in large accumulations of submerged leaves in
eddies, or backwaters of streams.
Chowan, Roanoke, Tar, and Neuse drainages. Sandy
Glassy Darter
W5
Current
runs of creeks and small to medium rivers. Species
No
(Etheostoma vitreum)
is often found in sand- and gravel -bottomed streams
with moderate to fast current.
Least Brook Lamprey
(Lampetra
T
Current
Tar and Neuse drainages. Clean, clear gravel riffles
No
ae tera)
and runs of creeks and small rivers.
Pinewoods Shiner
(Lythrurus
W2
Current
Tar and Neuse drainages. Sandy runs and flowing
No
matutimts)
pools of creeks and small to medium rivers.
Carolina Madtom
T
Current
Tar and Neuse drainages. Sand-, gravel-, and
Yes
(Noturtts ftiriosus)
detritus -bottomed riffles and runs of small to
Page 24 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Documented
Common Name
State
County
General Habitat Description
Occurrence
(Scientific Name)
Status'
Status2
within 1-mile
of Site3
medium rivers. Species is often found in very
shallow water with little or no current over fine to
coarse sand bottom.
Invertebrates
Roanoke, Chowan, Tar, Neuse, Cape Fear drainages.
Triangle Floater
Streams with a mixture of coarser or finer gravel
(Alasmidonta
T
Current
with sand and mud, or in between large stones.
Yes
undulata)
Species is also found in big rivers in muddy sand
with moderate current.
Box Spike
Neuse, Lumber, Pee Dee drainages; Lake
(Elliptio
W3,
Cunent
Waccamaw. Freshwater river basins. Species is
No
cistellaeformis}
W5
often found along the banks of rivers, often among
the tree roots.
Carolina Slabshell
V'?,
Drainages north to the White Oak drainage. Sandy
(Elliptio congaraea)
WV
Current
substrates in swift water of medium sized rivers to
No
smaller creeks.
Tar and Neuse drainages. Coarse to medium sized
Yellow Lance
sandy substrates, rocks, and in mud, in slack water
(Elliptio lanceolate)
L
Current
areas. Species is found in the main channels of
No
drainages down to streams as small as a meter
across.
Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, White Oak, Cape Fear,
Roanoke Slabshell
Lumber, and Yadkin -Pee Dee drainages. Near -shore
(Elliptio roanokensis)
T
Current
trough habitats in sand and gravel substrates.
Yes
Tributary creeks and rivers occasionally provide
significant habitat.
Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, Cape Fear, Yadkin -Pee Dee
drainages. Coarse sand and gravel at the downstream
Atlantic Pigtoe
h
Current
edge of riffles. Fast flowing, well oxygenated waters
No
(Fusconaia masoni)
with high quality riverine/large creek habitat.
Species is typically found in headwaters or rural
watersheds.
Yellow Lampmussel
Chowan, Roanoke, Neuse, Tar, Cape Fear, Lumber,
(Lampsilis cariosa)
E
Current
Yadkin -Pee Dee drainages. Larger streams and
No
rivers, with sand and gravel and stable low gradient.
Chowan, Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, Cape Fear, Yadkin-
Eastem Lampmussel
[
Current
Pee Dee drainages. Small streams, large rivers,
Yes
(Lampsilis radiata)
ponds, and lakes. Species is found on a wide variety
of substrate types, but prefers sand or gravel.
Green Floater
Roanoke, Tar, Neuse and Yadkin -Pee Dee
(Lasmigona
L
Current
drainages; New and Watauga drainages. Quiet,
No
subviridis)
smaller streams, in pools and eddies with gravelly
and sandy bottoms, and good water.
Chowan, Roanoke, and Tar drainages, and abundant
in Lake Waccamaw. Ponds, canals, and slow -
Tidewater Mucket
T
Current
moving sections of rivers; including artificial
No
(Leptodea oehracea)
impoundments. Species is found in a variety of
substrates, including silt, sand, gravel, cobble, and
occasionally clay.
Page 25 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Documented
Common Name
State
County
General Habitat Description
Occurrence
(Scientific Name)
Status'
Statusz
Within 1-mile
of Site;
Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, Cape Fear, Yadkin -Pee Dee,
Creeper
Catawba, Broad, and French Broad drainages.
(StroStreams
hitus
T
Current
and rivers in a range of flow conditions
No
undulatus)
(rarely in high -gradient streams of mountainous
regions); occasionally lakes and ponds, particularly
in outlets.
Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, Yadkin -Pee Dee, and Catawba
Notched Rainbow
SC
C'urre"t
drainages. Coarse substrates, including gravel,
No
(Villosa constricta)
cobble, boulder, and bedrock, occasionally clay or
silt.
North Carolina Spiny
Chowan, Roanoke, Neuse, and Tar drainages. Clear,
Crayfish
(Orconectes
Sc
Current
shallow permanent rivers and streams with little or
No
carolinensis)
no visible flow.
Pamlico Crayfish
Tar and Neuse drainages. Sluggish streams and
(Procambarus
W3
Current
ditches, with sandy mud bottoms.
No
medialis)
Vascular Plants
Bellow's-beak Sedge
(Carex
W I
Current
Somewhat shaded dry to mesic woodlands.
No
h sorh ncha
Cottongrass
(Eriophorum
W 1
Historical
Pocosins, acidic seeps, and peat -burn pools (peaty
No
vir inicum)
sites).
Violet Lespedeza
(Lespedeza
W7
Current
Woodlands and woodland borders.
No
rutescens)
Yellow Water -
crowfoot
SC-H
Historical
Pools in floodplains of small stream blackwater
N
(Ranunculus
swamps, other stagnant or slowly moving waters.
abellaris
Pale Beaksedge
(Rhynchospora
W 1
Current
Savanna-pocosin and sandhill-pocosin ecotones,
No
allida)
peaty seepage bogs, and sandhill seeps.
iE = State Endangered (animal)
T = State threatened (animal)
SC = Special Concern (animal)
SR = Significantly Rare (animal)
WI = Watch Category I includes animals that are known to be declining in North Carolina, for one reason or another
W2 = Watch Category 2 includes animals that are rare to uncommon in North Carolina, but are not necessarily considered to be
declining or otherwise in trouble
W3 = Watch Category 3 includes animals that are poorly known in North Carolina, but are not necessarily considered to be
declining or otherwise in trouble
W5 = Watch Category 5 includes animals with increasing amounts of threats to its habitat, whether or not populations are known
to be declining
SC-H = Special Concern -Historical - any species or higher taxon of plant that occurred in North Carolina at one time, but for
which all known populations are currently considered to be either historical or extirpated)
SR-P = Significantly Rare -Peripheral - the species is at the periphery of its range in North Carolina
SR-O = Significantly Rare -Other - the range of the species is sporadic or cannot be described by the other Significantly Rare
categories
W7 = Watch Category 7 includes plants with inadequate information about their distribution and rarity in North Carolina
Z County Status = Current or Historical Element Occurrences.
'NDEQ, NCNHP Data Services. http://ncnhp.org/web/nhn/database-search. Website accessed December 5, 2018
Page 26 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
5.3.10. Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Summary
Wood E&I conducted a background research in January 2017 on the Mitigation Project. Based on this
background research, it was clear that no archaeological resources or architectural resources had been
recorded within the boundaries of the proposed Mitigation Project (Figure 13a in Appendix A); however,
several known historic resources were present, within the site, but unrecorded. The literature and records
search also revealed that no archaeological sites or significant architectural resources had been recorded
within the immediate project vicinity. Fieldwork for the archaeological reconnaissance survey was focused
on areas within the project area that may be impacted directly by the proposed mitigation plan, such as
stream and wetland improvements. Accordingly, shovel testing was conducted in these areas of proposed
impacts.
As a result of the archaeological reconnaissance survey, isolated brick fragments and a small historic artifact
scatter were identified during pedestrian inspection as shown on Figure 13b in Appendix A. The historic
scatter was found in association with what appears to be an old well within an overgrown thicket adjacent
to SR 33. This seems to represent the location of a structure; however, no structure is depicted at this
location on the 1905 or 1908 topographic maps (Figures 5a and 5b, respectively, in Appendix A), nor is
there one evident in an aerial photo dating to 1954 (Figure 6a in Appendix A). One of the brick fragments
identified during the reconnaissance survey appears to be in the vicinity of a collection of structures
apparent on the 1954 aerial photograph (Figure 6a in Appendix A) of the area. No additional remains were
found in this location and it has been heavily plowed. While the artifact scatter does represent an
unrecorded archaeological site and the additional work in the vicinity of the brick fragment may reveal an
archaeological site in this location too; the proposed PRM plan would not impact these portions of the study
area. Should the plans change and impacts in these spots be proposed, additional archaeological
investigation may be required. One additional brick fragment was identified in the vicinity of Tributary A-
1, which is proposed for stream restoration. No structure is depicted at this location on historic maps or
aerials and the fragment likely represents an isolated artifact displaced by heavy plowing conducted during
row crop production. It is unlikely that this brick fragment represents the remains of a significant cultural
resource. Shovel testing (n=23) was conducted judgmentally in upland portions of the study area that will
be impacted by stream and wetland restoration. All of these tests were negative.
An informal historic architectural reconnaissance survey was also conducted as part of this investigation in
order to provide preliminary National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility determinations for
four known historic structures and a historic cemetery within the study area. Based on this investigation,
none of four structures appear to be eligible for the NRHP based on their dilapidated conditions or lack of
significant architectural style.
The Bulluck Cemetery is located within an overgrown thicket adjacent to SR 33. Based on the site visit, it
does not display characteristics that would make it eligible for NRHP listing; however, it is protected by
North Carolina state law and should not be impacted. At present, no impacts to this portion of the survey
area are planned.
As a result of the cultural resource reconnaissance, it seems that the impacts associated with this Mitigation
Project are unlikely to have adverse effects on significant cultural resources. This information was provided
for planning purposes and additional investigation may be required to fulfil Section 106 requirements. Full
copies of the Archeological Reconnaissance Survey and Architectural Reconnaissance Survey are located
in Appendix J.
5.4. MITIGATION WORK PLAN
5.4.1. Mitigation Project Site
The Mitigation Project is generally located at 36.0040 °N and 77.6072 *W. The proposed Mitigation Project
site is currently owned by Palustrine Group, LLC. The proposed conservation easement will encompass
approximately 160 acres of protected land and is expected to permanently protect approximately 63 acres
of preserved, enhanced, and restored wetlands and approximately 1.6 miles (8,576 linear feet) of preserved,
enhanced, and restored unnamed tributaries to Swift Creek as illustrated in Figure 14a and Figure 14b in
Page 27 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Appendix A.
5.4.2. Wetland Mitigation
5.4.2.1. Wetland Preservation
Wetland preservation activities within the Mitigation Project are anticipated to protect approximately 34.9
acres of wetlands, as shown in Figure 14a in Appendix A. The proposed wetland preservation areas: 10 and
13 are part of the active floodplain of Swift Creek and consist of a mix of high quality bottomland hardwood
forests communities and cypress -gum swamp with a few scattered Coastal Plain semi -permanent
impoundments. Wetlands 4 and 6 are located in the adjacent upland areas and are connected to the larger
wetland complex of Swift Creek by tributaries A-1. Riparian corridors will be reestablished with restoration
of these tributaries with native vegetation. The proposed corridor width is 200 feet on either side of the
tributaries.
5.4.2.2. Wetland Enhancement
Wetland enhancement activities within the Mitigation Project are proposed within Wetlands 7, 11, and 12
as shown in Figure 14a in Appendix A. These jurisdictional wetland areas have been hydraulically modified
through the construction of ditches which were constructed to effectively drain the water table for
agricultural use. Additionally, an access road bisecting portions of Wetlands 11 and 12 was constructed
above the natural grade and is acting as dam and causing ponding of these existing features. Existing
ditches within the current wetland feature that will not be considered for stream
restoration/enhancement/preservation activities will be filled. Soil from adjacent upland areas within the
existing row crop areas will be excavated and used to fill the ditches to match the surrounding grade.
Additionally, the road that bisects Wetlands 11 and 12 will be excavated down to natural grade and a low
water crossing will be installed to allow the natural flow of surface water between the adjacent wetland
features. In areas where ponding has occurred, a natural plant community will be established in accordance
with Section 5.4.4 Natural Community Reestablishment.
5.4.3.Hydrologic Monitoring
Groundwater monitoring wells will be installed within selected portions of the mitigation site to ensure that
wetland hydrology is maintained in those areas following hydrologic manipulation of the site. Wells will
be installed within the wetland restoration areas, and in selected wetland enhancement and preservation
areas. Wells will be installed within the wetland restoration area (Wetland 3) at a density of 1 well per 4
acres of restored wetland. Two wells will be installed upstream and two wells will be installed downstream
of the existing road which crosses wetland 10, 11, and 12.
Proposed monitoring well locations are illustrated on Figure 17 in Appendix A
5.4.4.Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Restoration and Natural Community Reestablishment
The naturally occurring riparian buffers and plant communities within the Mitigation Project have been
altered due to historic agricultural practices. Predominantly, the Mitigation Project has been placed into
row crop productions within the upper terrace and grazing land for past cattle operations within the upland
areas in the lower terrace of the Swift Creek floodplain. Additionally, the hydrology within the Mitigation
Project has been drastically altered through the installation of ditches within the majority of the
jurisdictional stream and wetlands. Once the hydrologic and hydraulic impairments have been corrected,
the proposed mitigation work plan will include the restoration of the naturally occurring plant communities
and the reestablishment of riparian areas along the proposed restoration reaches within upper terrace and
preservation in the lower terrace. It is expected that a minimum 200-foot-wide buffer, originating from the
top of bank of the existing/proposed stream feature and existing ditches will be reestablished/preserved
within the conservation easement. A brief description of each plant community type to be restored within
the Mitigation Project and associated riparian buffers is provided below.
Page 28 of 57

b u,a, I, Pta�tiSP�'
J�a 1
c-c".)
� � M �",,L �
P�
go
5 A 4,4 1- � U, M ��\
vi
�t �,U,fy c
15 -40�6� -&Y-Ks

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
5.4.4.1. Planting Plan
The planting plan for the mitigation work areas will be divided into three zones for plant community
establishment:
• Zone 1: Longleaf Pine Establishment
• Zone 2: Bottomland Hardwood Forest Establishment
• Zone 3: Cypress -Gum Swamp Establishment
Species selection will be modified to account for areas that may be wetter depending on site conditions.
These identified wetter areas may be planted with cypress, water tupelo, and swamp blackgum. Higher
areas with shorter hydroperiods will be established more typical bottomland species with an emphasis on
hardmast species. There are numerous existing seed sources for lighter seeded, early successional species
like sweetgum, red maple, and sycamore.
5.4.4.2. Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest
The predominate wetland plant community within the Mitigation Project is Coastal Plain bottomland
hardwood forest. These areas are palustrine with seasonally to intermittent flooding. The restored areas
will contain a similar hydrologic regime. The water table may be high for long periods even when the site
is not flooded.
A mixture of bottomland oaks such as swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), cherry bark oak, laurel
oak (Q. lawifolia), water oak, willow oak and overcup oak (Q. lyrata) along with other bottomland
hardwoods such as shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), bittemut (C. cordiformis), water hickory (C. aquatica),
black walnut (Juglans nigra), and sugar berry will be planted on 6 foot by 12 foot centers. The herbaceous
community will slowly reestablish naturally from adjacent seed sources.
5.4.4.3. Cypress -Gum Swamp
The bottomland hardwood forest will grade into cypress -gum swamp where the hydroperiod is extended
and flooding along with prolonged inundation are common. Bald cypress along with water tupelo will be
planted in these areas. Planting will be on a wider spacing of 12 foot by 12 foot to replicate more open
stand conditions common of these plant communities.
5.4.4.4. Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp
Areas along the new stream channels will have the hydrology restored due to the elevated bed channel.
These areas will be characteristic of a Coastal Plain small stream swamp. Species composition will be
similar to bottomland hardwoods with the exception of planted live stakes of black willow, cottonwood
(Populus heterophylla), and silky dogwood (Corpus amorrtum).
5.4.4.5. Wet Pine/Mesic Pine Flatwoods Establishment
Areas outside of the jurisdictional areas which are currently in row crops or abandoned pasture will be
reestablished as wet to mesic pine flatwoods based on soil and topographic positions. These areas will be
planted with longleaf pine on a wide spacing to allow for reestablishment of native warm season grasses.
Longleaf pine seedlings will be planted during the dormant season following the site preparatory burn in
abandoned pasture areas (December to March). Deep ripping may be required in the row crop areas to
facilitate longleaf pine establishment. Longleaf pine seedlings will be planted at a density of approximately
300 stems per acre (12 foot x 12 foot spacing).
Planted areas will be placed into a burn regime as described below, with burning times to be determined by
habitat objectives. Should site conditions not allow a prescribed fire during a monitoring year, herbicide or
mechanical treatments may be considered to reduce woody competition. Mortality of young seedlings is
expected to reduce pine density over time to mimic natural, open grown stands.
Page 29 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Thinning, using various means, to reduce pine densities over time are recommended to prevent canopy
closure. Any thinning activities will be overseen by a NC licensed forester and will be conducted to ensure
the long-term success of the desired longleaf pine flatwood ecosystem.
5.4.4.6. Mixed Hardwood Forest
In the ecotones between the pine flatwoods and jurisdictional wetland areas will be areas of mixed
hardwood forest. Some of these areas are preexisting and will continue to be managed. Other areas will
be reestablished where they are currently in row crop production or are small isolated areas that do not
lend themselves to active management. These areas will be managed to limit exotic, invasive vegetation
when practical to ensure the functionality of the mitigation areas.
Mixed hardwood forest areas may grade into cypress -gum swamps or small stream swamps or Coastal Plain
bottomland hardwoods down slope or into pine flatwoods further up slope. The ecotone within this area
will contain a mosaic of species due to landscape position and fire history.
7A5.4.4.7. Vernal Pool Establishment CO.
Vernal pools are anticipated to be created as part of the restoration plan. Site manipulation from an
extensive history of agriculture has significantly altered the area's hydrology. Areas will be excavated in
the adjacent uplands to borrow material to fill and plug the extensive network of ditches. Some excavation
is anticipated in the wetland restoration area as well to fill and plug the ditches. The pools in these areas
will likely be permanently inundated except during extreme drought.
Where possible, fire will be allowed to enter the edges of the pools during prescribed bums of the
surrounding flatwoods. Fire is recommended to reduce the prevalence of hardwood species and increase
the native herbaceous cover along the pond margins.
The seasonal fluctuation and variation among years in water levels is the primary environmental factor in
these communities. Some of these pools may accumulate muck in the bottom while others may remain
sandy. The vernal pools are being created to provide breeding habitat for amphibians.
5.4.4.8. Prescribed Burns
A prescribed bum schedule will b veloped by a Iicensed NC forester for the proposed pine flatwood re-
establishment areas. All initia d subsequent bums will be conducted by prescribed fire professionals with
experience within the regi . It is anticipated that prescribed burning activities will be implemented yearly
for the Zitigation
se years, and then every three to five years following. However, more intensive
burningsary to reduce unwanted competition and reduce planted longleaf pine densities. Fire
intensitjusted in subsequent years to provide the best results of this habitat management
techniqill be conducted when conditions favor fire across the range of forest communities
within n Project. Prescribed bums will not be conducted when ponded water dominates the
site or,eather creates dangerous fire conditions and fire control problems. Burning will only
operate during conditions where smoke will have the least effect on adjacent populated areas.
5.4.4.9. Fire Breaks
Fire breaks will be installed within Mitigation Project prior to any prescribed burning activities. Fire break
locations will be further refined once the Mitigation plan has been accepted; however, placement of
firebreaks will be at the discretion of the Certified Prescribed Fire Manager to protect adjacent properties
and to maintain control of the fire. It is anticipated that firebreaks will be approximately 10 to 12 feet wide,
and easily maintainable with standard agricultural equipment. Firebreaks will not be used where fire is
prescribed adjacent to mature hardwood areas. It is anticipated that the fire will naturally play out within a
transition zone between pine and hardwood communities.
Page 30 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
5.4.5. Stream Mitigation
5.4.5.1. Stream Preservation
Proposed stream preservation efforts within the Mitigation Project will permanently protect approximately
383 linear feet of stream channel and their associated buffers. The stream reaches proposed for preservation
area are as follows:
• Tributary B-1 (-383 LF)
The proposed stream preservation activities are illustrated on Figure 14a in Appendix A. � 7
5.4.5.2. Stream Restoration
The stream reaches proposed for restoration within the Mitigation Project will be constructed as described
in this section. Preliminary design plans (30%) are included in Appendix G for review. Additional
information will be collected on reference sites and within the Mitigation Project to further enhance the
design plans prior to construction. Based upon on -site evaluation of the existing stream reaches and
discussions with federal and state agencies, Tributary A-1, B-2, and K will be restored through a
combination of Coastal Plain headwater stream reestablishment and Rosgen Priority 1 techniques. The
proposed restoration activities described below for each of the restoration reaches.
5.4.5.2.1. Headwater Stream Restoration
Portions of Tributary A -I (-533 LF) and B-2 (-1,056 LF) are anticipated to be restored through the use of
headwater stream restoration techniques. The proposed restoration plan will include the fililliinn the existing
ditches and removal of the spoil piles that parallels the remnant channel and low point of the valley. By
filling the existing ditch system, the naturally occurring hydrology will be returned. The natural surface
water during periods of high ground water and/or significant storm events is expected to reoccupy the
remnant channels where they currently exist and passively recreate the historic pattern and profile where it
no longer exists. Where necessary, floodplain sills will be installed to prevent incision and reduce the
potential for head cuts working their way up through the stream system. All care shall be taken to avoid
over compaction of the native soils and disturbance to the existing plant community. Where land
disturbance activities are expected, the natural plant community will be reestablished in accordance with
Section 5.4.4 Natural Plant Community Establishment.
5.4.5.2.2. Rosgen Priority i Restoration
The lower portion Tributary A-1 and K will be restored through the use of Rosgen Priority 1 restoration
techniques. Priority 1 restoration methodology includes replacing the existing incised relic channel with a
new bankfull discharge channel, sized appropriately for the watershed, at a higher elevation where it can
utilize the relic floodplain. In the upper reaches of each of the proposed restoration area the cross -sections
will be less well defined and will have a moderate to high sinuosity. As the watershed for each restoration
increases, the proposed channel cross-section will be more defined and the sinuosity will be decreased and
will have an irregular meander pattern similar to natural coastal plain streams. As required, some
excavation or grading will be required to restore historic flow patterns within the Mitigation Project.
Excavations within the floodplain are expected to minimal. Additionally, vernal pools will be excavated
along the proposed restoration alignments to provide habitat diversity within floodplain.
The stream bed of the proposed restoration reaches will vary between riffles and pools. It is expected that
pools will be constructed in some of the meander bends and downstream of woody structures in straight
sections of the channel. In -stream channel structures used to prevent scour and provide banks stabilization
till woody vegetation can be established will consist of, but not limited to, log vanes, log sills, and brush
toe. In higher gradient areas and areas of high stress, 100% biodegradable coir matting will be installed
prior to the establishment of permanent vegetation. Floodplain sills (as necessary) will be installed at the
headwaters of each of the proposed restoration reaches and at key points along the existing ditch line to
prevent reoccupation of the ditch until permanent vegetation has been established.
Page 31 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
The proposed construction Priority Restoration reaches and subsequent filling of the exiting ditches within
the Mitigation Project is expected to inundate the floodplain and raise the existing water table. Hydraulic
restoration of the site should promote the re-establishment of historically drained wetland features adjacent
to the proposed restoration reaches throughout the Mitigation Project.
The stream reaches proposed linear footage for each restoration reach is as follows. For purposes of this
mitigation plan and the preliminary nature of the design, sinuosity for each proposed reach is approximately
1.20 and the proposed stream lengths have been calculated based on the existing valley slope.
• Tributary A-1 (-5,925 LF)
• Tributary K (-679 LF)
5.4.6. Reference Sites
5.4.6.1. Reference Streams
At the time of this this report, no stream reference reaches have been identified. For the purposes of this
study, the regional curve data provided by North Carolina State University (NCSU) for stream located
within the Coastal Plain of NC was utilized in the development of the 30% design plans (Appendix G) to
determine to propose geomorphology of the restoration reaches. The regional curve data published by
NCSU for the NC coastal plain is as follows:
• Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: y = 14.52x°-6' R2 = 0.88
• Bankfull Discharge: y = 16.56x°'2 R2 = 0.90
• Bankfull Width: y = 10.97xo.36 Rz = 0.87
• Bankfull Mean Depth: y = 1.29x0.30 R2 = 0.74
Stream reference reaches, suitable for this proposed mitigation work plan, will be identified and evaluated
prior to final design and construction. Identified reference reaches will be located within the upper coastal
plain of North Carolina and be of high quality and exhibit a stable planform and geomorphology. Data
gathered from the reference reaches will include:
• Drainage Area (DA)
• Valley Type
Bankfull Width (Wbkr)
• Bankfull Depth (Dbkf)
• Max Bankfull Depth (D,,,a )
• Floodprone Width (Wcpa)
• Valley Slope (S,,.,,ey)
• Channel Slope (S,n,,„„,,)
5.4.6.2. Reference Wetlands
• Sinuosity (K)
• Pool Width (Wp.i)
• Pool Depth (Dp,,.i)
• Max Pool Depth (DN(,l „, )
• Pool -to -pool spacing (Lp-p)
• Belt Width (Wbit)
• Wavelength (La,)
• Radius of Curvature (Rr)
Wetland reference areas will be identified within either the Mitigation Project tract, or adjacent previously
conserved tracts within the Upper Tar River watershed. The target plant communities of the Mitigation
Project wetland enhancement and ecological restoration areas will attempt to replicate the species
composition of the reference wetlands and show a progression towards the vegetation strata and diversity
of the reference site by the end of the monitoring period.
5.5. FEMA FLOODPLAIN AND HYDROLOGIC TRESPASS
The project stream channels do not have an associated regulatory floodplain; however, the downstream end
of Tributary A-1 is located within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone AE
of Swift Creek (see Figure 16 in Appendix A). Swift Creek was performed as a detailed study including
100-year base flood elevations and mapped floodway. Portions of Swift Creek are mapped as FEMA Zone
AE on floodplain Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels 4801, 4802, 4811, and 4812 within the
Mitigation Project.
Page 32 of 57

,'I. r b��a; aO- -z Play

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
No net fill is proposed in the mapped section of Swift Creek floodplain. A detailed grading plan and
evaluation of the proposed effects on hydrology will be submitted for approval by the Edgecombe County
floodplain administrator.
The project will be designed so that any increase in flooding will be contained on the project site and will
not extend upstream to adjacent parcels, so hydrologic trespass will not be a concern. The proposed
restoration has been designed to transition back to the existing boundary conditions in a gradual manner.
5.6. Section 401/404 Permitting
As discussed in Section 5.3.4.1 Description of Jurisdictional Features, impacts to jurisdictional waters of
the U.S are expected with the proposed restoration and enhancement activities detailed within the proposed
mitigation work plan. It is expected that the impacts associated with this PRM plan will be covered under
the individual permit issued to CSX for impacts to jurisdictional water of the U.S. associated with the
construction of the CCX Terminal and Line of Road Improvements Project.
5.7. MAINTENANCE PLAN
All access roadways used for vehicular access within the Mitigation Project tracts will be used as fire breaks
and future access to the properties. Annual inspections, throughout the monitoring period, will be
conducted on access roadways and fire breaks as needed. Mechanical clearing for existing and additional
fire breaks may be needed to denote management tracts within the mitigation properties and along property
boundaries to prevent encroachment during prescribed burns onto adjacent property owners. All
maintenance activities will be consistent with the long-term management practices and objectives. All other
activities (prescribed burns, mechanical treatment, and chemical treatment) to be conducted are considered
part of the mitigation work plan.
5.8. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The following performance standards are intended to provide a basis of evaluation concerning each site's
fulfillment of ecological uplift. Performance standards detailed below are consistent with the USACE's
guidance document Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update dated
October 24, 2016. Upon completion of the proposed mitigation activities, annual monitoring will be
conducted to assess the condition of the completed project(s). The wetland and stream restoration and
enhancement portions of the project will be assigned specific performance criteria components for
hydrology, vegetation, and morphology (stream only).
Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the seven-year post -construction monitoring period. If
all performance criteria have been successfully met and two bankfull events have occurred during separate
years, no additional monitoring beyond the seven-year period is expected. If performance standards have
not been met by year and/or the performance metrics or if remedial actions are required, additional
monitoring may be required to ensure that the Mitigation Project is stable and the target communities are
established. If performance standards cannot be met through remedial action, the Mitigation Project, or
portions thereof, may be deemed to have failed and the Permits and/or its Agents will seek alternative
compensatory mitigation suitable to the USACE. 4 D W Y~
The performance metrics proposed for this Mitigation Project and associated wetland and stream
preservation, restoration, and enhancement projects are as follows:
5.8.1. Wetland Mitigation
5.8.1.1. Wetland Preservation
Initial success will be achieved upon approval by USAGE of the conservation easement documentation and
the recordation of the easement within the local jurisdiction. Permanent photograph stations will be used to
document any changes during the monitoring period in existing vegetation, particularly invasive and
noxious species, and hydrologic indicators. The final monitoring report will document that all preserved
Page 33 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
areas are intact in their approved condition and that no activities have occurred that are in violation of the
restrictions listed in the conservation easement prior to the site being transferred to the long-term steward.
5.8.1.2. Wetland Enhancement - Hydrology
The predominant 'ls within the wetland restoration and enhancement areas consist of Roanoke soils.
Wetland by gy wt be considered established if well data from the wetland enhancement areas indicate
that ground ater is with[ 12 inches of the soil surface for 7% target saturation period for monitoring years
1 and 2 an 9-12% for onitoring years 3 — 7 of the annual growing season during normal weather
conditions. T growing eason for the Mitigation Project season was taken from COOP Station 318500,
which is located in Tar oro in Edgecombe County. According to the NRCS, the growing season is
considered to be th od with a 50% probability that the daily minimum temperature is higher than 28'
F. Based upon this information the growing season for Edgecombe County extends from March 21 to
November 11 for a total of 235 days (USDA, NRCS 2002). Based on this growing season, success will be
achieved at the project site if the water table is within 12 inches of the soils surface for 17 consecutive days
or more during the established growing season for monitoring years 1 and 2 and a minimum of 21
conservative days for monitoring years 3 — 7.
5.8.2. Stream Mitigation
5.8.2.1. Stream Preservation
Initial success will be achieved upon approval by USACE of the conservation easement documentation and
the recordation of the easement within the local jurisdiction. The stream top -of -bank will be surveyed on
the conservation easement plat to be submitted to the local jurisdiction for recordation with the County
Records Office. The condition of each preservation reach will be documented with yearly photographs, for
the duration of the required monitoring period, taken at permanent photographic monitoring locations. The
final monitoring report will document that all preserved areas are intact in their approved condition and that
no activities have occurred that are in violation of the restrictions listed in the conservation easement prior
to the site being transferred to the long-term steward.
5.8.2.2. Stream Restoration and Enhancement
5.8.2.2.1. Dimension
Shallow section cross -sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, maximum depth ratio and width -to -depth ratio. Shallow cross -sections should fall within the
parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type (when applicable). The bank height
ratio (BHR) will not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratio (ER) will be no less than 2.2 at any measured
riffle cross-section.
The BHR and ER at any measured riffle cross-section should not change by more than 10% from the
baseline (as built) condition during any given monitoring interval (e.g., no more than 10% between years
1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 5, or 5 and 7). For example, if BHR is calculated to be 0.8 at a given cross section
following monitoring year 1, acceptable BHR calculated for that cross section in monitoring year 2 would
be 0.8 f 0.08 (0.72 to 0.88). If any changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the
stream channel is showing signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg
or eroding channel banks. Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced
habitat include a decrease in the width -to -depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth.
Remedial action would not be taken if channel changes indicate a movement toward stability.
In order to monitor the channel dimension, two permanent monumented cross -sections will be installed per
1,000 linear feet of stream restoration work and represent approximately 50% shallow/riffle and 50% pool
areas within each restoration and enhancement reach. Each cross-section will be permanently marked with
pins to establish its location. An annual cross-section survey will include points measured at all breaks in
slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg. It is important to note that in sand bed
channels pools and bed forms (ripples, dunes, etc.) may migrate over time as a natural function of the
channel hydraulics. These sorts of bed changes do not constitute a trend towards instability or indicate a
Page 34 of 57

�Ld�r
:5TYp 6kll^
auAo l

Swift Creck — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
stream bed and banks (i.e., an ordinary high water mark) as documented by the following
indicators:
• Bed and banks (may include the formation of stream bed and banks, development of channel
pattern such as meander bends and/or braiding at natural topographic breaks, woody debris, or
plant root systems)
• Natural Iine impressed on the bank (visible high water mark)
• Shelving (shelving of sediment depositions indicating transport)
• Water staining (staining of rooted vegetation)
• Change in plant community (transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long
duration, including hydrophytes)
• Changes in character of soil (texture and/or chroma changes when compared to the soils
abutting the primary path of flow)
&9,3, Vegetation
Within the planted portions of the Mitigation Project in the riparian corridors, along restoration and
enhancement stream reaches and within wetland restoration and enhancement areas, a minimum of 320
stems per acre must be present at year three; a minimum of 260 stems per acre must be present at year five;
and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at year seven. Planted trees in each plot must measure
7 feet in height at year five and 10 feet in height at year seven. Volunteer species may count towards the
stems per acre requirements, but species must be included on the approved planting palette. Other volunteer
species not included in the approved planting palette may be submitted to and reviewed by the USACE on
a case -by -case basis for inclusion. Any single species will only account for up to 50% of the required
number of stems within any vegetation plot. Where the vegetation plot is dominated by volunteer species,
remedial action as, specified in the Adantive Management Plan or as directed by the USACE may be
required. �{ ., -overage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary
�- throughot
5.8.4. T `� �
toration
The majoi Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer restoration has been historically
altered an, ure fields. Approximately 26.10 acres of Tar -Pamlico riparian
buffers (T iithin the project site. The existing agricultural fields will be
ripped an( d/ sting, The fields are generally clear and will require minimal
grading prior to Duller vegetation planting. The areas proposed for buffer restoration will be ripped
perpendicular to the surface water flow direction. The ripping activities will also be utilized to eliminate
potential hard pans. Select herbicide treatments and limited mechanical clearing may be completed to
remove undesirable plant species prior to planting activities. Any herbicide applications will be performed
by a licensed pesticide applicator.
Within the riparian buffer restoration eas, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be pLesent-year three;
a minimum of 260 stems er acre st be resent at ear five• and -a imum_of21Q acr ust
P �► P Y � -per � m
t�set�t at-y$a��euea lattterl si e�chhIlot mt�c as�!.�e ���_ras 7 in height at ear -five
and ee t j yci ..sev�m olunteer species may count towards the stems per acre requirements,
but species must be included on the approved planting palette Any single species will only account for up
. �� to 50% of the required number of stems within any vegetation lot. Where the vegetation plot is dominated
l� by volunteer species, remedial action as specified in the Adaptive Management Plan may be required. The
extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary throughout the
_ required monitoring period.
\
`. the planting plan for the site will include planting bare root Gees and/or containerized stock and controlling
invasive species growth. Vegetative species selected for the; site will be bottomland hardwood species that
represent community descriptions from Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina
(Schafale and Weakley, 1990) Coastal Plain Bottomland ardwood (NC WAM Bottomland Hardwood
Forest and Headwater Forest wetland types).
\ Page 36 of 57 1.

Swift Creek — Pennittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
stream bed and banks (i.e., an ordinary high water mark) as documented by the following
indicators:
• Bed and banks (may include the formation of stream bed and banks, development of channel
pattern such as meander bends and/or braiding at natural topographic breaks, woody debris, or
plant root systems)
• Natural line impressed on the bank (visible high water mark)
• Shelving (shelving of sediment depositions indicating transport)
• Water staining (staining of rooted vegetation)
• Change in plant community (transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long
duration, including hydrophytes)
• Changes in character of soil (texture and/or chroma changes when compared to the soils
abutting the primary path of flow)
5.8.3. Vegetation
Within the planted portions of the Mitigation Project in the riparian corridors, along restoration and
enhancement stream reaches and within wetland restoration and enhancement areas, a minimum of 320
stems per acre must be present at year three; a minimum of 260 stems per acre must be present at year five;
and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at year seven. Planted trees in each plot must measure
7 feet in height at year five and 10 feet in height at year seven. Volunteer species may count towards the
stems per acre requirements, but species must be included on the approved planting palette. Other volunteer
species not included in the approved planting palette may be submitted to and reviewed by the USACE on
a case -by -case basis for inclusion. Any single species will only account for up to 50% of the required
number of stems within any vegetation plot. Where the vegetation plot is dominated by volunteer species,
n remedial action as, specified in the Adaptive Management Plan or as directed by the USACE may be
required. The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary
throughout the required monitoring period.
•�� 5.8.4. Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Restoration
aThe majority of the project site proposed for Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer restoration has been historically
altered and are currently maintained agriculture fields. Approximately 26.10 acres of Tar -Pamlico riparian
buffers (TOB — 200 feet) will be restored within the project site. The existing agricultural fields will be
ripped and scarified prior to vegetation planting. The fields are generally clear and will require minimal
grading prior to buffer vegetation planting. The areas proposed for buffer restoration will be ripped
perpendicular to the surface water flow direction. The ripping activities will also be utilized to eliminate
potential hard pans. Select herbicide treatments and limited mechanical clearing may be completed to
remove undesirable plant species prior to planting activities. Any herbicide applications will be performed
by a licensed pesticide applicator.
Within the riparian buffer restoration ea, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be p esen a year three;
a minimum of 260 stems per acre st be present at year five;
ch lot mus tin height at e e
ee ' ht at olunteer species may count towards the stems per acre requirements,
but species must be included on the approved planting palett Any single species will only account for up
to 50% of the required number of stems within any vegetation lot. Where the vegetation plot is dominated
by volunteer species, remedial action as specified in the Ada ive Management Plan may be required. The
extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary throughout the
required monitoring period.
e planting plan for the site will include planting bare root ees and/or containerized stock and controlling
I
species growth. Vegetative species selected for the site will be bottomland hardwood species that
represent community descriptions from Classification of he Natural Communities of North Carolina
(Schafale and Weakley, 1990) Coastal Plain Bottomland ardwood (NC WAM Bottomland Hardwood
Forest and Headwater Forest wetland types).
Page 36 of 57 V J�

Swift Creek — Pe►nuttee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
need for remedial actions.
5.8.2.2.2. Pattern and Profile
A longitudinal profile will be collected as part of the as -built survey; however, longitudinal profile surveys
will not be conducted during the seven-year monitoring period unless other indicators during the annual
monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical and lateral instability. As mentioned above, migration of pools
and bed forms is expected and does not require remedial action. Stream pattern and profile will be assessed
visually as described below.
5.8.2.2.3. Substrate
Pebble count procedures will not be conducted for this project due to the sand bed nature of the streams.
5.8.2.2.4. Stream Hydrolosv
Four separate bankfull flow events, occurring in separate years, must be documented on the restoration and
enhancement reaches during monitoring years 1 through 7. Stream monitoring will continue until success
criteria in the form of four bankfull events in separate years have been documented.
Under normal circumstances stream flow must be documented to occur every year for at least 30
consecutive days during the seven-year monitoring period. Where the Priority 1 restoration reaches are
proposed for intermittent reaches, an automated gauge will be installed to track the frequency and duration
of the stream flow event. Additional monitoring may be required if surface water flow cannot be
documented due to abnormally dry conditions.
5.8.2.2.5. Macroinvcrtebrates
Macroinvertebrates will be assessed prior to beginning restoration activities to establish a baseline for
population diversity and abundance. The final performance standard will be no net decrease in diversity
and abundance by the end of the seventh year of monitoring.
5.8.2.2.6. Headwater Stream
Headwater stream monitoring will be applied to portion of Tributaries A-1 and B-2 stream (and others if
required by NCDEQ - DWR). This channel will be restored utilizing passive, headwater stream restoration
techniques, and monitored as follows.
Under normal circumstances surface water flow within the valley or crenulation will be documented to
occur every year for at least 30 consecutive days during the seven-year monitoring period. Additional
monitoring may be required if surface water flow cannot be documented due to abnormally dry conditions.
Channel formation will be documented using indicators consistent with RGL 05-05 in accordance with the
following schedule:
a. During monitoring years 1 through 4, the preponderance of evidence must demonstrate a
concentration of flow indicative of channel formation within the topographic low -point of the
valley or crenulation as documented by the following indicators:
• Scour (indicating sediment transport by flowing water)
• Sediment deposition (accumulations of sediment and/or formation of ripples)
• Sediment sorting (sediment sorting indicated by grain -size distribution within the primary path
of flow)
• Multiple observed flow events (will be documented by gauge data and/or photographs)
• Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
• Presence of litter and debris
• Wracking (deposits of drift material indicating surface water flow)
• Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent (herbaceous or otherwise)
• Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
b. During monitoring years 5 through 7, the stream must successfully meet the requirements of
standard 2(a) above and the preponderance of evidence must demonstrate the development of
Page 35 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
The bare -root seedlings and/or containerized stock will be planted over 26.10 acres of the project site. The
seedlings of tree species found within Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods will be planted at a density of
approximately 500 stems per acre. A mixture of bottomland oaks such as swamp chestnut oak, cherry bark
oak, laurel oak, water oak, willow oak and overcup oak along with other bottomland hardwoods such as
shagbark hickory, bitternut hickory, water hickory, black walnut, and sugar berry will be planted on 6 foot
by 12 foot centers. Species to be planted will be based on nursery availability at the time of planting: Th
herbaceous community will slowly reestablish naturally from adjacent seed sources.
5.8.5. Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Preservation
Approximately 15.20 acres of existing Tar -Pamlico riparian buffers will be preserved on (the project site.
This preservation will protect the existing buffers from impacts such as timber harvesting, ading, filling,
clearing or other similar activities that could affect buffer functions. Areas specified as Buffer Preservation
as defined by 15A NCAC 02B .0295, are depicted on Figure 14b. These areas will only provide buffer
mitigation credits and cannot be converted into nutrient offset credits. The Preservation areas range from
50 to 100 feet wide.
Initial success will be achieved upon approval of the conservation easement documentation and the
recordation of the easement within the local jurisdiction. The buffer preservation areas will be surveyed on
the conservation easement plat to be submitted to the local jurisdiction for recordation with the Edgecombe
County Records Office. The condition of each buffer preservation area will be documented with yearly
photographs for the duration of the required monitoring period, taken at permanent photographic
monitoring locations. The final monitoring report will document that all preserved areas are intact in their
approved condition and that no activities have occurred that are in violation of the restrictions listed in the
conservation easement.
5.8.6. Visual Monitoring
Photographs should illustrate the site's vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis. Cross-
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal photos
should indicate the absence of persistent bars within the channel or vertical incision. Grade control
structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane arms is preferable.
Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected. Reference photos will also be
taken for each of the vegetation plots. Lateral reference photos should show a stable cross-section with no
excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition
of sediment on the bank side of vane arms is preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of
vane arms is expected. Within preservation areas, photos should show that no activities have occurred or
are occurring that are in violation of the restrictions included in the conservation easement prior to the site
being transferred to the long-term steward.
5.9. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monitoring reports for the Mitigation Project will be consistent with the USACE' guidance document
Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update dated O tober 24, 2016 and
adhere to the minimum standards provided in RGL 08-03. The monitoring period will extend seven years
for stream and hydrology assessments beyond completion of construction or until perfo ance criteria have
been met. Monitoring reports will be completed for all seven years and provided to th SACE for review
by no later *Akpril 1 of the year following the monitoring.
Monitoring reports will include an executive summary that states the overall monitoring results, to include
stream and wetland hydrologic monitoring, vegetation monitoring, macroinvertebrate monitoring, and area
of concern (such as beaver activity, exotic/invasive vegetation, stream instability, supplemental planting,
etc.) The performance standards outlined in Section 5.8 will be stated verbatim in the monitoring report.
Graphs and/or tabular data used in the monitoring report to document results from the monitoring period
will be overlaid with the as -built data and data form the preceding monitoring years.
Page 37 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
5.9.1. As -built Survey
An as -built survey/report for all stream/wetland restoration and enhancement areas and natural community
reestablishment areas will be completed within the project site to document the baseline conditions. The
as -built survey will include photo documentation as well as all cross -sections and monitoring instruments
(hydrology gauges, crest gauges, etc.), a plan view diagram, a copy of the recorded easement boundary
markers, a longitudinal profile, and vegetation information (type and number of species planted and
planting zones for targeted plant communities). The as -built survey will also indicate the locations of all
monitoring activities (permanent vegetation plots, groundwater and surface water gauges, crest gauges,
cross -sections, permanent photo locations, and aquatic biota sampling points). Any changes to the projected
wetland acreage or stream linear footage and associated credit amounts stated in this mitigation work plan
will be documented and detailed descriptions provided in the as -built report.
The as -built survey/report will be provided to the USACE within 90 days of completion of all physical and
biological improvements. An as -built survey/report will not include preservation -only areas contained
within the Mitigation Project.
5.9.2. Wetland Preservation
Visual assessments will be conducted annually to qualitatively evaluate Mitigation Project site conditions.
Permanent photograph stations will be established at representative locations within the wetland
preservation areas. The placement of stations should consider spatial distribution of the wetland
preservation areas and document various wetland types. Each photograph station will be permanently
marked in the field using rebar with a standard survey cap as well as a tall poly -vinyl chloride (PVC) pipe
to aid in location (metal pipe to be used in areas where prescribed burns are planned). Photograph stations
will be located with three-dimensional coordinates and georeferenced to NAD83-State Plane Feet.
Successive photographs taken at the photograph station will replicate the orientation and capture area of
previous photographs. Photographs will also be used to document significant or adverse changes in other
portions of the wetland preservation area. At the end of the monitoring period, wetland preservation areas
will be assessed using the Routine On -Site Determination Method as defined in the USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain regional
supplement (Environmental Laboratory 2010). This technique uses a multi -parameter approach which
requires positive evidence of three criteria: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland
hydrology. The field evaluation will also include an assessment using the NC WAM methodology to
evaluate and determine that the wetland preservation areas have been maintained throughout the
monitoring period.
5.9.3. Wetland Enhancement and Restoration -- Hydrology
Groundwater elevations will be monitored to evaluate the attainment of jurisdictional wetland hydrology.
Verification of wetland hydrology will be determined by automatic recording well data collected within the
project wetland. Within the restoration area, automatic recording gauges will be established to cover a
density of one well per four acres. Daily data (recorded a minimum of twice daily) will be collected from
the automatic recording well over the seven-year monitoring period post -construction.
A detailed soil profile description will be recorded for each automated gauge location. The soil profile
description will include soil horizon present, and the color, texture, and any redoximorphic features present.
Soil profile descriptions shall conform to the standard procedures as specified by the USDA-NRC
(Schoenberger et al., 2002). Each well station will have GPS coordinates and elevation at ground level
(msl) and calibrated to match the level of the gauge. If an offset is used for the elevation, the offset distance
will be recorded within the monitoring report. If the offset changes over the course of the monitoring
period, the change and reason will be documented in that periods monitoring report.
Automated groundwater recording wells will be installed in accordance with the techniques and standards
described in the USACE's "Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites"
(ERDC TN-WRAP-05-2, June 2005. In particular, wells will be installed with bentonite seals and be
Page 38 of 57

Swift Creek — Pertnittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
approximately 4feet in depth.
Hydrology data will be included in a summary table that includes the gauge identification number, number
of days of saturation, and percent hydroperiod. Each monitoring year will include the data from all previous
monitoring years. Additionally, each monitoring report will include an explanation and/or graphical
representation that portrays whether the Mitigation Project had an above, below, or normal precipitation
year. The growing season will also be stated (start date, end date, and number of days).
The hydrological data collected from the Mitigation Project for the wetland restoration and enhancement
areas will be placed into context of normal, wetter than normal, or drier than normal, precipitation based
on the most recent 30-year period of record. An automated rain gauge will be installed to collect and record
rainfall at the Mitigation Project. A separate rain gauge will not be required for stream mitigation if a gauge
is already installed for the wetland component. The rain gauge will incorporate a tipping -bucket design (at
a 0.01 inch tipping interval) and record sufficient data to determine rainfall quantities, rates and duration.
Rainfall data collected from the gauge will be correlated with local weather stations and compared to the
NRCS WETS tables to determine if normal rainfall conditions exist during the monitoring period. The rain
gauge will be downloaded during each site visit. A manual all weather funnel style rain gauge capable of
storing multiple events will be installed and the data recorded at each site visit to back up the automated
rain gauge. if necessary, rainfall from the nearest weather station may be used to supplement data collected
on -site if issues occur with the sampling equipment.
5.9.4. Vegetation
Vegetative monitoring will occur betwo�n July 1 and leaf op. During the first monitoring year, vegetation
monitoring will occur at least 180 day ton planting has been completed and the monitoring
plots have been established. A combination of approximately 50% permanent fixed plots and 50% random
plots will be utilized to demonstrate vegetative cover. Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be
located on a stratified random basis across. the Mitigation Project within each target community in order to
representatively sample a subset of plantings.
Plot sizes for the determination of stem density, diversity, and vigor (height) will be a minimum of 0.02
acres in size, and will typically be square or rectangular with care taken to ensure that placement of the plot
is representative of the surrounding conditions. Vegetation monitoring plots will occur within a minimum
of two percent of the planted pprtion of the site with a minimum of four plots per site.
Upon initial establishment of vegetation plots, the plot corners will be identified in the field with permanent
markers at each corner (rebar or metal T-posts) and GPS-located. Each plot will also be marked with a 10-
foot tall PVC pole installed over one of the corners and labeled with the plot number. Each planted tree will
be tagged and have a 3-foot tall piece of PVC pipe installed next to it for easier identification during the
monitoring period. For plot vegetation monitoring, the following metrics will be documented:
• Within each fixed plot: species, height, grid location, planted versus volunteer, and age (based upon
the year the stem was planted, or first observed for volunteers)
• Within each random plot: species and height
• For both fixed and random plots, all woody stems, including exotic and invasive species, will be
counted.
Individual plot data for planted and volunteer species will be provided separately. Vegetation species will
be identified by common and scientific name and wetland indicator status. Data will not be averaged over
the entire Mitigation Project to obtain a single figure for stem density. Density refers to the number of
living, planted stems per acre. Stems are defined as individual plants, where plants with multiple shoots are
treated as a single stem. Live stakes will not count toward the stem counts. Volunteer plants growing within
plots will be counted separately from planted vegetation in the monitoring reports. Volunteer plants must
be present for at least two growing seasons before counting toward meeting performance standards for
monitoring year five and seven.
C_
Page 39 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
approximately 4feet in depth.
Hydrology data will be included in a summary table that includes the gauge identification number, number
of days of saturation, and percent hydroperiod. Each monitoring year will include the data from all previous
monitoring years. Additionally, each monitoring report will include an explanation and/or graphical
representation that portrays whether the Mitigation Project had an above, below, or normal precipitation
year. The growing season will also be stated (start date, end date, and number of days).
The hydrological data collected from the Mitigation Project for the wetland restoration and enhancement
areas will be placed into context of normal, wetter than normal, or drier than normal, precipitation based
on the most recent 30-year period of record. An automated rain gauge will be installed to collect and record
rainfall at the Mitigation Project. A separate rain gauge will not be required for stream mitigation if a gauge
is already installed for the wetland component. The rain gauge will incorporate a tipping -bucket design (at
a 0.01 inch tipping interval) and record sufficient data to determine rainfall quantities, rates and duration.
Rainfall data collected from the gauge will be correlated with local weather stations and compared to the
NRCS WETS tables to determine if normal rainfall conditions exist during the monitoring period. The rain
gauge will be downloaded during each site visit. A manual all weather funnel style rain gauge capable of
storing multiple events will be installed and the data recorded at each site visit to back up the automated
rain gauge. If necessary, rainfall from the nearest weather station may be used to supplement data collected
on -site if issues occur with the sampling equipment.
5.9.4. Vegetation
Vegetative monitoring will occur betw n July 1 and leaf op. During the first monitoring year, vegetation
monitoring will occur at least 180 day ton planting has been completed and the monitoring
plots have been established. A combination of approximately 50% permanent fixed plots and 50% random
plots will be utilized to demonstrate vegetative cover. Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be
located on a stratified random basis across the Mitigation Project within each target community in order to
representatively sample a subset of plantings.
Plot sizes for the determination of stem density, diversity, and vigor (height) will be a minimum of 0.02
acres in size, and will typically be square or rectangular with care taken to ensure that placement of the plot
is representative of the surrounding conditions. Vegetation monitoring plots will occur within a minimum
of two percent of the planted portion of the site with a minimum of four plots per site.
Upon initial establishment of vegetation plots, the plot corners will be identified in the field with permanent
markers at each corner (rebar or metal T-posts) and GPS-located. Each plot will also be marked with a 10-
foot tall PVC pole installed over one of the corners and labeled with the plot number. Each planted tree will
be tagged and have a 3-foot tall piece of PVC pipe installed next to it for easier identification during the
monitoring period. For plot vegetation monitoring, the following metrics will be documented:
• Within each fixed plot: species, height, grid location, planted versus volunteer, and age (based upon
the year the stem was planted, or first observed for volunteers)
• Within each random plot: species and height
• For both fixed and random plots, all woody stems, including exotic and invasive species, will be
counted.
Individual plot data for planted and volunteer species will be provided separately. Vegetation species will
be identified by common and scientific name and wetland indicator status. Data will not be averaged over
the entire Mitigation Project to obtain a single figure for stem density. Density refers to the number of
living, planted sterns per acre. Stems are defined as individual plants, where plants with multiple shoots are
treated as a single stem. Live stakes will not count toward the stem counts. Volunteer plants growing within
plots will be counted separately from planted vegetation in the monitoring reports. Volunteer plants must
be present for at least two growing seasons before counting toward meeting performance standards for
monitoring year five and seven.
Page 39 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Visual assessments will be used to identify problem areas, including the presence of exotic species. Exotic
species, such as Chinese privet and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), will be monitored and
controlled to conform to the success criteria. We understand that these species have become naturalized to
the area and complete removal of these species from enhancement areas is not possible, but they will be
controlled so that the desired community structure can be obtained. Exhibit 7 identifies common potential
problems that may be noted during vegetation monitoring and will be used to track the location and cause
of any such problems identified within the planted areas.
Monitoring events will be used to evaluate the site for the presence of invasive species and noted in the
monitoring report. Implementation of invasive species control measures will be conducted in accordance
with the Adaptive Management Plan.
Photographs will be taken at two corners of each monitoring plot, facing towards the interior of the plot.
Photos will include plot center and surrounding vegetation. The first photograph will include the maker
pole and its label and the second photo will be taken from the opposite comer.
59.5. Stream Preservation
Stream preservation monitoring stations will be established in representative areas along the protected
streams. The placement of stations will consider spatial distribution of the stream preservation areas and
document a variety of stream orders. Stream condition will be documented annually at permanent
photograph stations. Each photograph station will be permanently marked in the field using rebar with a
standard survey cap and a 10-foot tall PVC or metal pole with the photograph number demarcated.
Photograph stations will be located with three-dimensional coordinates and georeferenced to NAD83-State
Plane Feet. Successive photographs taken at the photograph station will replicate the orientation and capture
the area of previous photographs.
5.9.6. Stream Restoration and Enhancement
Monitoring for stream restoration and enhancement will coincide with monitoring events occurring on years
1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream surveys will generally follow the methodology contained in the USDA Forest
Service Manual, Stream Channel Reference Sites (Harrelson, et.al, 1994).
5.9.6.1. Dimension
Permanent, monumented cross -sections will be established in Priority 1 stream restoration reaches. Cross -
sections will be placed in representative features, and upper and lower extents to evaluate stream dimension.
Permanent cross -sections will be installed at a rate of two cross -sections per 1, 000 linear feet. Permanent
monuments will be established by rebar with a standard survey cap and a tall PVC or metal pole with the
cross-section number at the left and right extents of each cross-section by either conventional survey or
Global Positioning System (GPS). The cross-section surveys will provide a detailed measurement of the
stream and banks and pertinent features of the channel's geometry. The survey should include points located
at:
• the left and right monument*
• on the floodplain (extending out past the
monument if applicable)*
• top of banks*
• at bankfull*
• toe of slopes*
*These points should be identified looking downstream
• edge of channel*
• at the edge of water
• at the thalweg
• terraces and other major grade changes
along the entire length of stream
All channel cross -sections will include measurements of Bank Height Ratio and Entrenchment Ratio, which
will be documented in monitoring reports.
Page 40 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Permanent photograph stations at each cross-section will document stability and channel evolution during
the monitoring period. The location of each photo point will be permanently marked in the field using rebar
with a standard survey cap and a tall PVC or metal pole with the photograph number demarcated. The
bearing/orientation of the photograph will be documented. Photographs should be taken looking across
channel, looking upstream, and looking downstream, showing as much of the banks and channel as possible.
The survey tape will be centered in each photograph and the water line will be located near the lower edge.
An effort will be made to consistently show the same photograph area in each subsequent monitoring event.
5.9.6.2. Pattern and Profile
As stated in Section 5.8.2.2.2, longitudinal profile surveys will not be conducted during the seven-year
monitoring period unless other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical and
lateral instability. As mentioned above, migration of pools and bed forms are expected and do not require
remedial action. Stream pattern and profile will be assessed visually. If longitudinal profiles are required,
due to concerns of instability, longitudinal will be surveyed for a distance of 25 times the bankfull width.
The beginning and ending points of each measured profile will be monumented on both stream left and
stream right with rebar and a 10-foot tall PVC or metal pole with the reach name/number demarcated.
Three-dimensional coordinates will be documented and georeferenced to NAD83-State Plane Feet.
The survey should include points located at the following locations on the stream's profile:
• thalweg
• water surface
• top of bank
• bankfull
• log sill location
• maximum pool depths
The water surface elevation shall be noted at each survey shot along the profile survey or spaced
appropriately. Locations of channel nick points (for example, culverts, gas, or sewer pipelines) or natural
grade control structures (for example, fallen logs, or roots) should be documented where applicable. The
survey will be used to document the following parameters:
• Average Water Surface Slope
• Riffle Slope/Average Water Surface Slope (Ratio)
• Pool Slope/Average Water Surface Slope (Ratio)
• Pool -Pool SpacingBankfull Width (Wbkf)
Measurements of the restored channel pattern, to include belt width, meander length, and radius of curvature
will be collected during subsequent monitoring years within the same sections surveyed for the longitudinal
profiles during the required as -built survey. Calculations will be made of sinuosity, meander width ratio,
radius of curvature/bankfull width ratio, and meander length/bankfull width ratio. The annual monitoring
report will address pattern measurements that deviate outside of the design range.
5.9.6.3. Hydrology
The occurrence of stream flows meeting or exceeding the designed bankfull stage will be evaluated during
each monitoring year. Occurrence of bankfull events will be documented through the use of crest gauges
or continuous monitoring devices, or comparable methods. Crest gauges or continuous monitoring device
will be installed on each stream system that is greater than 1,000 feet in length, with one gauge required for
every 5,000 feet of length on each tributary, with a maximum of 5 gauges per restoration reach. The height
above bankfull will be recorded for each event. Visual inspections and photographs will be used to augment
this data.
An automated rain gauge will be installed to collect and record rainfall at the Mitigation Project. A separate
rain gauge will not be required for stream mitigation if a gauge is already installed for the wetland
component. The rain gauge will incorporate a tipping -bucket design (at a 0.01 inch tipping interval) and
record sufficient data to determine rainfall quantities, rates and duration. Rainfall data collected from the
gauge will be correlated with local weather stations and compared to the NRCS WETS tables to determine
Page 51 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
if normal rainfall conditions exist during the monitoring period. The rain gauge will be downloaded during
each site visit. A manual all weather funnel style rain gauge capable of storing multiple events will be
installed and the data recorded at each site visit to back up the automated rain gauge.
5.9.6.4. Macroinvertebrate
Habitat availability and macroinvertebrate communities will be monitored in streams where functional
uplift is attributed to maintenance or improvements in biological communities. Macroinvertebrate sampling
will be conducted once a year during monitoring years 3, 5, and 7. Monitoring stations will be located on
every perennial restoration and enhancement reach greater than 1,000 feet in length. Additional sampling
points will be established per additional 2,000 feet of length on each restoration or enhancement reach
(1,000' = 1 point, 3,000' = 2 points, 5,000' = 3 points, ect.). Sampling locations will be based on riffle
condition and best professional judgment and occur within the same riffle year-to-year.
Macroinvertebrate sampling will be processed by a qualified taxonomist and/or NCDEQ — Division of
Water Resources (DWR) certified laboratory for macroinvertebrates. Macroinvertebrates will be identified
to genus. Biotic indices, including percent EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera), North
Carolina Biotic Index, Shannon -Weaver Diversity Index, Taxa Richness and a species list for each station,
will be listed in the monitoring report. Each report will include a summary of the current results and all
past monitoring events in tabular format.
5.9.6.5. Headwater
Headwater stream monitoring will be conducted annually for seven years. Surface water flow monitoring
will be conducted in accordance with Section 5.9.6.3. Gauge stations will be located within the anticipated
primary path of flow within the low point of the valley to ensure all flow events are captured. The number
of gauge stations will be sufficient to document the upper end of stream formation when considered with
the required field indicators listed in the performance standards.
Channel formation within the valley or crenulation will be documented through the identification of field
indicators consistent with those listed in RGL 05-05. Identified field indicators will be documented using
data sheets and photographs, and the location of those photo documentation points will be permanently
marked with rebar and a 10-foot tall PVC or metal pole with the reach name/number demarcated. Three-
dimensional coordinates will be documented and georeferenced to NAD83-State Plane Feet and illustrated
on a site map included annual monitoring report. Additional monitoring and/or analysis may be necessary
in the event of abnormal climactic conditions.
5.9.7. Visual
Visual monitoring of the Mitigation Project will be conducted on an annual basis. Photo documentation
will be used to illustrate the site's vegetation and morphological stability. Permanent photo location points
and transects will be established within the Mitigation Project. Each photograph station will be permanently
marked in the field using rebar with a standard survey cap and a I0-foot tall PVC or metal pole with the
photo location name/number demarcated. Photograph stations will be located with GPS coordinates and
georeferenced to NAD83-State Plane Feet. Successive photographs taken at the photograph station will
replicate the orientation and capture the area of previous photographs.
Visual monitoring of the Mitigation Project will be used to document encroachments, areas of poor
vegetation growth, beaver activity, excessively or inadequately drained areas, stream bank stability, etc.
For stream enhancement and restoration reaches cross-section and longitudinal photo locations will be
permanently established. A survey tape pulled across the cross-section will be centered in the photographs
of the stream channel banks. Photographs will be taken at representative grade control structures along the
restored/enhanced stream. The photographer will make every effort to consistently maintain the same area
in each photo over time. Additionally, photos will be taken annually at permanent locations within stream
and wetland areas identified for preservation. Reference photos will also be taken for each of the vegetation
plots. One representative digital photo of each vegetation plot will be taken on the same day vegetative
Page 52 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
monitoring is conducted.
The results of the visual assessment will be included in the Annual Monitoring Report and identify the date
the assessment was conducted. Additionally, a narrative will be included and may describe the overall
condition of the Mitigation Project and describe any areas of concern. Once a feature of concern has been
identified, that same feature will be reassessed on all subsequent visual assessments with photographs taken
from the same location year -to year until the issue has been corrected.
5.10. LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT
j 'roject during the ih�itosing period will be the responsibility of Palustrine
W RLC to ensure long-term site ves are met. The Mitigation Project
tgement of Palustrine Group and ll maintained and protected to ensure
he Swift Creek watershed. Activities include ensuring there are no
g within the protecte . areas. Also, any additional management activities
ie exis rng forest will be implemented by Palustrine Group.
wift Creek Property are anticipated to be developed into a mitigation bank,
._,.___Z—approvals. Following the development of the mitigation bank and
completion of all restoration and enhancement stream and wetland activities, the fee title will be transferred
to TRLC.
Tl �� �' �� rs the site will be a reemerging forest over the majority of the site with
a : I n :ed habitat conditions. This mosaic will include forests, riparian areas,
w C EI ( successional habitat. It is anticipated that the Swift Creek Property
of �J�� C� access for passive recreatio h may include hiking, nature
l n education opportunities A blue trail uld exist in the future along
S1 a can be planned.
A easement will be passively managed with no timber cutting or
di �zo
...... ....... .. 8_.___.__ �trvNive species, beaver management or active wildlife management.
JBZffes within the USAGE area may be burned to allow for a natural mosaic of plant communities.
+e control o ipecies tfiaf in�[ypotentially adversely affect long-term objectives may take place through
the site including the control of herbivores. Designated areas in the upland areas may be more actively
rpan�ed relying on disturbance regimes such a`s-burnrng, disking, mechanical and chemical treatments for
vegetation control to allow for more open conditions and maintain early succession habitat. Burning maybe
OW
to encroach into beaer zones as well -as jurisdictional areas if it contributes to the long-term
objectives. Throughout the property, a network of foot and single track trails will be installed to allow for
public access to the unique, diverse natural features of the site. The proposed network of foot and single
track trails will not allow for vehicular use and will utilize mulch and other natural permeable materials in
their construction. Additionally, educational signage maybe placed in various locations along the trails.
Sensitive areas may have boardwalks or other features to allow for public access and to limit the damage
from foot traffic.
No new roads are proposed to be constructed within the upland portions of the Mitigation Project.
Additionally, the main interior road will be moved during construction. The main interior road will be
moved out of the adjacent jurisdictional and associated Tar -Pamlico buffer areas except for where it crosses
various jurisdictional features in the Swift Creek Iloodplain. The proposed crossings will consist of low
water crossings, sufficient to allow for natural flow of surface water within the jurisdictional feature without
ponding. The existing and proposed interior roads will only be utilized for management and educational
activities as well as public safety.
1
Page 53 of 57

Swift Creek -- Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
monitoring is conducted.
The results of the visual assessment will be included in the Annual Monitoring Report and identify the date
the assessment was conducted. Additionally, a narrative will be included and may describe the overall
condition of the Mitigation Project and describe any areas of concern. Once a feature of concern has been
identified, that same feature will be reassessed on all subsequent visual assessments with photographs taken
from the same location year -to year until the issue has been corrected.
5.10. LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT
Management of the Mitigation ect uring the ng period will be the responsibility of Palustrine
Group with consultation TRLC t9-ensure long-term site tives are met. The Mitigation Project
will be under the long-1 management of Palustrine Group and '11 maintained and protected to ensure
the long-term protec 'on of the Swift Creek watershed._ t ities include ensuring there are no
encroachments or trash mp g within the rote s: Also, any additional management activities
deemed necessary to maintain e� rest will be implemented by Palustrine Group.
The remaining portions of the ift Creek Property are anticipated to be developed into a mitigation bank,
pending USACE and�pprovals. Following the development of the mitigation bank and f�
completion of all restoration and enhancement stream and wetland activities, the fee title will be transferred l� '
to TRLC. UUU
TRLC has a vision that in thirty years the site will be a reemerging forest over the majority of the site with
a mosaic of stand types and associated habitat conditions. This mosaic will include forests, riparian areas,
wetlands, emergent marsh and early successional habitat. It is anticipated that the Swift Creek Property
will be made open to the public for access for passive recreatio h may include hiking, nature
observation, and nature/conservation education opportunities A blue trail uld exist in the fufure along
Swift Creek if access to this resource can be planned.
Jurisdictional areas under USACE easement will be passively managed with no timber cutting or
d ce ess agemen o ' ive species, beaver management or active wildlife management.
Buffer zones within the USACE area ma a burned to allow for a natural mosaic of plant communities.
c ive control o species t at m potentially adversely affect long-term objectives may take place through_
the site including the control of herbivores. Designated areas in the u land areas may be more actively
ana ed relyingon disturbance regimes such as uming, disking, mechanical an c erruca treatments for
vegetation control to allow or more open con ittons and maintain early succession habitat. Buming maybe
allowed to encroach into butfer zones as we as Juris cttona ar i i contributes to the long-term
objectives. Throughout the property, a network of foot and single track trails will be installed to allow for
public access to the unique, diverse natural features of the site. The proposed network of foot and single
track trails will not allow for vehicular use and will utilize mulch and other natural permeable materials in
their construction. Additionally, educational signage maybe placed in various locations along the trails.
Sensitive areas may have boardwalks or other features to allow for public access and to limit the damage
from foot traffic.
No new roads are proposed to be constructed within the upland portions of the Mitigation Project.
Additionally, the main interior road will be moved during construction. The main interior road will be
moved out of the adjacent jurisdictional and associated Tar -Pamlico buffer areas except for where it crosses
various jurisdictional features in the Swift Creek floodplain. The proposed crossings will consist of low
water crossings, sufficient to allow for natural flow of surface water within the jurisdictional feature without
ponding. The existing and proposed interior roads will only be utilized for management and educational
activities as well as public safety.
Page 53 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
5.11. SITE PROTECTION
The acquisition and protection of the Mitigation Project is intended to provide compensatory mitigation for
unavoidable wetland losses from the construction of the CCX Terminal and Line of Road Improvements
Project. The protection mechanism on the mitigation areas (approximately 160 Acres) will be in perpetuity
through the use of a conservation easement equivalent to the conservation easement template provided by
the USACE Wilmington District (Appendix B). Figure 15 in Appendix A illustrates the proposed layout
of the USACE easement. The conservation easement holder (the "Easement Holder") has not been finalized
at this stage but, TRLC has, in principle, agreed to act as the Easement Holder.
aining portions of the Property not utilized in this PRM are being considered as a potential
migration bpnk subject to USACE and NCDEQ approvals. It is expected that once the remaining portion
OfAhS Swiff Creek Property is accepted as a mitigation bank, an acceptable USACE/NCDEQ conservation
easement will be placed on the remaining portions of the property. Following construction of
identified/approved restoration and enhancement activities, the easements will be transferred to the
Conservation Trust for North Carolina and the fee title of the Swift Creek Property, including the PRM
area, will be transferred to the TRLC.
5.12. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon completion of site construction, Palustrine Group will implement the post -construction monitoring
protocols previously defined in this document. In the event, one or more of the performance objectives
within the Mitigation Project fails to achieve the necessary performance standards as specified in the PRM
plan, the permit applicant and/or its agents shall notify the USACE immediately. Adaptive management
activities may consist of corrective actions and additional monitoring of the approved Mitigation Project or
implementation of an alternate PRM plan. Once it is determined that a corrective action plan is required,
the applicant and/or its agents shall:
1. Notify the USACE as required by the Individual Permit general conditions.
2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as necessary
and/or required by the USACE.
3.Obtain other permits as necessary.
4. Implement the Corrective Action Plan.
5. Provide the USACE a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions. This document shall depict the extent
and nature of the work performed.
Failure to actively pursue and implement an approved mitigation plan or to develop and implement an
adaptive management plan may be grounds for modification, suspension, or revocation of the associated
USACE authorization.
5.13. FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
Palustrine Group will provide financial assurances in a form acceptable to the USACE, sufficient to ensure
completion of all mitigation work, required reporting and monitoring, and any remedial work required
pursuant to Final Mitigation Plan. The financial assurance value will be based on the cost of doing the
mitigation work, including costs for land acquisition, planning and engineering, legal fees, mobilization,
construction, and monitoring. No financial assurances are proposed for the preservation areas of the site.
The financial assurance is proposed to be made payable to TRLC as a third -party designee, if acceptable to
the USACE. TRLC would agree to complete the project or provide alternative mitigation in the event
Palustrine Group were to default. The name of the specific provider of these assurances and the method by
which the financial assurances will be provided in the event that they must be utilized. Original copies of
the financial assurance documents will be provided to the District Engineer prior to the approval of the
mitigation. The financial assurance will be in the form that ensures that the District Engineer receives
notification at least 120 days in advance of any termination or revocation.
Page 54 of 57

Swift Creek -- Pennittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
5.14. CLOSURE
At the end of the monitoring period, upon satisfaction of the performance standards, Palustrine Group will
submit a request to the USACE for site close out. The USACE, in consultation with the other agencies,
shall use best efforts to review and comment on the request within 60 days of such submittal. If the USACE
determines the applicant and/or its agents has achieved the performance standards in accordance with this
PRM plan and all obligations under this plan, the USACE shall issue a close out letter to the Sponsor.
Page 55 of 57

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
& REFERENCES
Alderman, John M., Alvin L. Braswell, et al. 1993. Biological inventory: Swift Creek Subbasin. NC
Wildlife Resources Commission. 133 pp.
Bottomland Hardwoods. US Environmental Protection Agency.
https://www.epa.gov/wetlands/bottomland-hardwoods. Accessed May 1, 2017.
Dahl, Thomas E. 1990. Wetlands losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's. U.S. Department of the
Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife
Research Center Online. http://www.npwrc.usizs.gov/resource/wetlands/wetioss/index.htm
(Version 16JUL97).
Eggers, Steve, 2012. Target Hydrology for Compensatory Mitigation -Memorandum. US Army Corps of
Engineers, St. Paul District.
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Rule Listing the Tar River Spiny Mussel (Elliptio
(Canthyria) Steinstansana) as an Endangered Species. 50 Federal Register, Number 124
(Thursday, June 27, 1985).
Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Comstock, J.A., Schafale, M.P., McNab, W.H., Lenat, D.R., MacPherson,
T.F., Glover, J.B., and Shelburne, V.B., 2002, Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina,
(color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia,
U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,000).
Harrelson, Cheryl C; Rawlins, C. L.; Potyondy, John P. 1994. Stream channel reference sites: an
illustrated guide to field technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Haynes, R.J., Allen, J. A. and Pendleton, E. C. 1988. Reestablishment of Bottomland Hardwood Forests
on Disturbed Sites: An Annotated Bibliography. US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report
88(22). 104 pp.
"History." Tar River Land Conservancy. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 May 2017. <http://www.tarriver.org/about-
us/history/>.
Hunt, W.F., III, R.W. Skaggs, G.M. Chescheir and D.M. Amatya. 2001. Examination of the wetland
hydrologic criterion and its application in the determination of wetland hydrologic status. Report
No. 333, UNC Water Resources Research Institute, I I9pp.
Mitchell, R. J., and S. L. Duncan. 2009. Range of variability in southern coastal plain forests: its
historical, contemporary, and future role in sustaining biodiversity. Ecology and Society 14(1):
17.
NatureServe. 2017. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1.
NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://www.natureserve.org. (Accessed: May 1, 2017).
NC Department of Environmental Quality, Tar -Pamlico Nutrient Strategy Website. Accessed 5/1/2017.
https://deq.ne.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/nonpoint-source-
management/nutrient-strategies/tar-pamlico.
NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, Planning Section. Tar -
Pamlico River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan 2010 Summary. 10 pp.
NC Department of Water Quality. 2011.2010 NC DWQ Tar -Pamlico River Basin Plan, Upper Tar River
Subbasin, HUC 03020101.35 pp.
NC Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources, May 29th, 2009. Small Streams
Biocriteria Development.
NC Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources. February 2016. Standard
Operating Procedures for the Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates.
Page 56 of 57

Swift Creek - Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Prince, Ann, The Upper Tar River Basin: Swift Creek and Fishing Creek Subbasins. 6 pp.
Rosgen, David L. Applied River Morphology. 1996. Pagosa Springs, Colorado: Wildland Hydrology
Books.
Schoeneberger, P.J., D.A. Wysocki, E.C. Benham, and W.D. Broderson (eds.). 2002. Field book for
describing and sampling soils. Version 2.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National
Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE.
Skagg, R. Wayne, 2012. Effect of Growing Season on the Criterion for Wetland Hydrology. Wetlands,
32: 1135-1147.
Skaggs, R.W., Hunt, W.F., Chescheir, G.M., and Amatya, D.M. 1995. Reference Simulations for
evaluating Wetland Hydrology. In: K.L. Campbell (ed.) Versatility of Wetlands in the
Agricultural Landscape. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, MI, pp. 1-10.
Sprecher, S. W., and A. G. Warne. 2000. Accessing and using meteorological data to evaluate wetland
hydrology. ERDC/EL TR-WRAP-00-1. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center. (http://el.erde.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/wrap00-1/wrap00-l.pdf)
Sumner, J.P., M.J. Vepraskas, and R.J. Kolka. 2009. Methods to evaluate rainfall for short-term
hydrology assessment. Wetlands 29(3):1049-1062.
Tar -Pamlico River Basin, 2013. NC Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Environmental
Education and Public Affairs. Brochure. 6pp.
Tar River Spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana), 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. 2014. U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region, Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. Raleigh,
NC. 22 pp.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Technical standard for water -table monitoring of potential wetland
sites. ERDC TN-WRAP-05-02. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development
Center.
http://el.erdc.usace.army.roil/wrap/pdf/tnwrap05-2.pdf
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R.
W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer
Research and Development Center.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2004. Norfolk District Corps and Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality Recommendations for Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Including Site Design, Permit
Conditions, Performance and Monitoring Criteria. Norfolk District, Norfolk, VA. 33 pp.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Version 2.0, ed. J. F. Berkowitz, J.
S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-12-9. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2012. USGS Land Cover, accessed September, 2016, from
USGS website. http://landcover.usgs.gov
USDA Forest Service, 2011. Fiscal Year 2011 Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report. Francis Marion
National Forest, Revised Land and Resource Management Plan. 73 pp.
Vepraskas, M., Skaggs, R.W., Broome, S., Burchell, M., Caldwell, P., 2013. Wetland Hydrology
Assessment (for the NCDENR Science Advisory Panel on Aquatic Resource Re -Establishment).
Weakley, A.S. 2015. Flora of the southern and mid -Atlantic states, working draft of May 2015.
Wunsche, Christine. 2006. North Carolina's Pristine Rivers: Preserving Our Last Unspoiled Waters.
Environment North Carolina Research & Policy Center. 40pp.
Page 57 of 57

APPENDIX A
FIGURES

r
00
(D
La
CD
(_ �q
±*
�?
S
O�
0
b$9
»9
L00
�/
�/
ƒ�\
CD, �
�
i ƒw
0
d\\
0
ID
3 5
®
-0 -.0
@
§\!
§ § \
�
/
m
-n
CD
2
%.
a
%
2
0
\
R
@
(D
2
/
°
�
ƒ
�
0
z
ƒ
to
? (D�
]
0
e
(
2
�
.
§
2 .
NE.--mr2012 -REV Swd[GraWGISRepal +__w.mL­ w _

_ff
IV
o z
�
; c1
j
3
W Q
<
c�
D
� C
D �
n F
n (D
CD
M
O
N
O
CD
O
co
m
m
In
S
CD
Q
In
O 61 CL CL S z n
(O!1 y (D C)
O c-)
_ N N N S1
� p � � (D Z d N rn O N
< 0 O O Q N W Q O S D _
O CD 0 n' Z O O. 0) Z
D o c m D z
tv CD D
•p co -D N N
lD
CD
CD
a�i' dQ
04
op Cd
w
-. -
_o
m3
21?
3'S
ice
9 V $
8
N
O = �
04
ao°
z
o m
S3N
Z
P
� o
NOZ
C'
C1
6
io 6)
•zd=
rr
cc
O ('
a COD
N 17C'
4
uz
P.lEnvimnman2aUC12 • Prc, nWC180 - Paluslrna - REV. Swift C,.ekIGISYR.p.t FgureslFfpum 2. Proximity to Conserved Lands Map.mnd

a ar nJ 0 � m
N� C 0 0 emir N m
oo:ZPmf �$3
n ° o g _ 0
°
n n m
4
w
3 �^
°s accSiOD umi
7 S.Q_,m
7 7 n ,p p m as
t+7
10
(D
�.
� + y
.rt
O (7
3 CD
CD
(n (D
(D
.Ik
0r
ca
i L
CD
�S
C
Cl)
17
CD
a
2
C
n
co
U
m
r-n
as
o
m :i1
CD0
n.
a
CD
3
w
awn
C
M
2
SD (D
C
O
0
Z O
0
s m
G
O tD
(A
v
S
CD�! Q
r
•• �� '"'` '� '1 a i" It^ti � "�
4.
44
•�h ayi '' yyyf.+ ram„ ,A - r _ •r ••i _: "�... try r. - f i • 1M •� .r`� ',+' r .! _ �.- fj�.' � r+ .
r y
O
��f j� f _ � l � •fir' �y ,,,
i_y�, y • r�
O , ! wIf'�rY • YAk��, rr r N . �},iiL.��' • - � �J���l� ,� �� +c;• ��i
r �tj K k'~r'�Je"r'�t'1 LY•';' .ter �'-t.i�� IL
Al
O Y-, .�+•••.M' }fir 1�.:. �* i '�
CD
In
U) IK
,
(D
rr^^
U) CD
CD
S
NUIUMUNNUILLUF"',to
3 0 o v 7 <� m o o C a 1
c m cD
Cn Ci m a n to Q >_ > C N m
.CD C° (D 3 7 O tp O o CDCD (D C N
m (n v Q. Q a 3 N n � w CD y O.
CD a) CD
m "n -n Cn y' . (D Cl
(D O O a) •G 47 Cl
n tT N (D n �1 O
� (/� ID .�+ d C fD O O
0 COD Ci Q w
sllCD
c = C CD <D
cc
9L v (n m
CD C
C o
n
O
Z
qr
). � f ,}Mir � `e` r � � /. r �`. ► - ,-
EUMUUUUMMUMMUUM
m* 0 m (n K m 0 W 0 0 a v 0 O' r
O C N N0) Nm 0n << < <
na s fD
a@ m m m m C1 M
'< v m a= o o 0 o Vi m
CD 0 °N C
r o o m c � m m m m m p_
z m n 0)Q -C co � w L 96
2 0- -n -n n Cs
rn v o cD 0 0 m m r-O pt �
CD
CD 5 3' C O
C O m r-
0
C .�—.CD
(nXv (D y COD (Q
CD N CD
P.1E---m h2012• P,q.mW180-Paluw--REV Swift C-WGISR2 pw Fig.,.MFigoee Ja. USGS Lana Cove MMp,..d

0---
men.,%
p Al
Un
�U)
v;:p
0
7 �
COrn
in
m
' �Tytl
K� �A
0 r
CD
(a
CD
_ a
N
CD
(D
N
(D
a
S
C
C7
Q
Q
co
a
ID
3 �
o w
C
CD 0,
O cD <D
o C
7C
z
3
Z �' fD
� O
S j ;w
v n-i o
(A
w
Al CD
Q
M
co
m T n 0 _� m 0 m n m o c o a r
y N X fD [M, d O :D
4 C rn v a q 4 0 w 7 a1
7_ (A¢ CD
CD K O 7 7 -n(Op CO o N (D 70 C (A 3
m
N y d n' 5 y n n =h CL
CD m S -n
Q CCD o o w w GI
a v m m a_ 'rt C
°1 N CD CD C7 N a m
c o C: m CD
j r
cCn CA R CD
C w N
=3 C
w p En
Q
C O
a
o'
0
�iL
t
CD
y �
m— m tt c 6 w 5 p n n n = �_
n 2 cr -n -n a �' A 3
c�D j 0 CD O O S r Q 01
7 Q
N N 3_ 7
C 0 fD - r
m m
N y CD
CD D. c�D is
: m
N C
3 a
a

�cxccgc�
C�.o0.�V) m
Q0y G7to
a cnm cncs�nFcnm
o m
a.omo�o�om
a
my o v w
ID
m a N am (D m
�_0 a-o --o a -0
Cv ¢t lll N
v r -4 r
V1 cn � U1
3 3 3 3
3 > >
CD m m m
m m m m
I m m m m
m m n p
CD
i Cp 1 C/) M
Cn* �
GO GO rL
6 - D n
D (D 0 0
n CD CD
(D
( m v
N CD
o
7
F
-1
m
I
C
ID
m
O rn Ln
'D 0
m �
N n
C
m
c/n�
o
C ID
Y
N
(D
0
Q
CD
U2
m
�
m
�
:i
s
m
_
O
0
1
AO-
4
1r 4 pr
� • `wry*. �» �� �� �'� � �r_ f. t `a\'���t� 1 �_-
GIN
r rF..rrr.srArr�iI. rwl1.+... � I �I 4` /_� !—� ��•ti _ ;� 1
!: err+/ fr `■`11;j _I . �� V _ I
`•r � •rr 1. � r M � f r
• I A � �, �4 I i 'I ,
� f'�1i ••. # �/� —r�:. i� ` . � 1 � `��� _ fin.
i w
t
. ��__---• • A r '� fib �Y � "'
ol-
o� ♦ I a _
P1Envl—ntaf,201Z+Pioj c GJM-Pal-Una REV Swtll Cir9B GISWapW Flqu—Tgur04. USGS Tnpc®raphic Map. mxd

®®
(D
I
�5
°
L"n
n
n CD
N m
�
N
v
Qv
o
7
N
nYI
I+/
-0 :
1
_ CD
O•
1
CD
cr
m
°
to
fD
0 0
'0 o
OCD
3
3
cDr
0
0
n
O
--
_:� f
h
7LN
�„ � y � � ate• • �/1: .
ACV_ 4 A y.
f-16
♦�j f
4.NO
`• ��
•
TWA
Ila
�� � `,•4i 11 .� �!�
icy .
r►
o� 4' 41 • �1 j' »�
•
OF
f r
y C p .�. � /I• ,Ir
r_s
.ram. + - • •
r
�1 "fir =s 1 • Q Kf Q
.� �. C
• +�+ %
lb
o i • "h
° M Vh C n
fn ''r ' � • A ,,
FQ
u 4
n
.r
R1Envimnm W,2012.Prq.LM0180-Palustr--REV. Swdt D.WGIS`Repu1 Fgums+gum5a.Hb4orc MaP.mxd

1
R1E—nrnentak2012 • PrciftlAW180 - Pelualrhe -REV. Swat Gee
+ �
14
�a 4
1
,wo1 .Purl FlgumsTgum 5G. Hidurk Mapmxd
0
0
r
CD
n
Cl)
Cl)
CD
� r►
n
(D r1
n
D CD
D CD
CD
;pz-
c� CD
cn 77
O
o
rZ)
VJ
(D
r� y
r•• !ae
X
p 'n
n
co
N
o
c 63
� c
o
m
m
aM
a s
W N
0
C
�r
N m
7
1
Q
Z
CD CD
o
03
s3
CD
OCD
7
0)
yV
d
a

ogQ
PlEnvimnmenrafi2072 • Prq ec1e10160 - Paluelr na -REV. Swh CreekIGISWeporl hgumus Fgum 6a. Malo-Aerwl Map.mrd
r
r
cc
�cn
o
;*
(o5
co
a
� N
�-
w
Z
�
CD
�X,v�
cn
CD
v
CD
O
3
O
=1
`C
cn
CD
X
m
cc
CA cn
'a \
C
0
N o
Ccr
D
-
_
n
N
o
71
D
CD
o
0
C
3

�lb�og�nn
g
aQ�B gms�
am
c�o4o.n—�
m N
aro m`� °c(D
c ;p
co
U) o
G) v
(
c
Q
cn n
D n
Z
v
D
q ro
3
U)
" (c
CD
w
CD
W
O
ro
(D
a
(n
cD
C)
o
=
(f) n
s
CT
CD
C�(D
cr
2
o
C
U)
,+
Q
CQ
n
O
D
ID
S
O
1 a
I i
J� <
` r.! �. � ,f _ '� - 1. ✓'� � ..
CD
�`� h ��� [r'YM ;fir ••'Si`
imm ,
x lY ✓ - 1CA �1 ,
ilEnvimnm,,alGu;2+Prgt l,JI8U-Yalusti¢l6-HLV. Swdl C;,OK%%UISYYapWFioums6F,Nwebb.H.srurv:Aarial Map.mMO

u
CD
(o
_®
G� Q co rn�
c
w�
D-
N n
C)
Z CD
n CD
o (D
7c
CD
CCDD CD
) 7
inQ
. .
N Xv
�
CD w
Cv O
3
K
cn
CD
7
m
CD
N {p
a
to
73
o
� �
�
0
N
m
CCD
_2
n
CD CD
N
J
O
z
o
CD
w
�
�
V
of
i
'1! i
ol
All
r yf f
_FKN �K.• •1 �
i '/ • �. JJ
M ♦ ram/
N -►4 S �.. � H a
c .' `•4 �' _ >d a FY+. J`,,,►� .� •�, r•1 a• �, '�`1 •:1
is • � i 'aVT : r � `,. � `s • �- • � . ,
� '� ':. - fit♦ • �i' . ? � l r:�-• s-.. ',.
�� .. .if`
"\Env!M—nta12012 . Prcjecls10100 - Palustnne -REV Swig Greek IGISWepxt P,guresTq,re 6c. Hislonc Aenal Map.n 6

®
®
CD
Mrl
r^^Cr
VI
N
o
r VCCI
�a C
� cn
cn
CD
�}
a
cow
cow
w
D
0
n m
m
CD
d
U)
V?
OCD
(D
o
CD
Q
a"
Y r
��.
C III
N
C
d
N cn
3
N Ci
CL
CL
m
2
c�
C
U)
0
7
�
�
n
Z
3
tD
ID
�
o
Q
� Yrti•
0) •

m
�•� a�L c�� F_Ss^
m=Q�8 8WT�
N m a. m
p w C,
c ii w
<1 . a K m CD
a t o m° m CD
a
1
d
i
` .e t , ,� 1�►I�
14
+'��' •ice �� .a�'-+�' - .,
rn
m
cD
to
CD
Or
2 =*,
(C)O
(n
—►
t Cn
cn
�
Q.
rn
W
o
wv
Drn
Dm
C) CD
x
m m
� x
CD
co
T
v (Q
0
CU
O
CD
(D
m
n
1
O a, cn
'71
3-0
0-,
m
n y. (�
CD
c m CD
y
71
Z v CD
Q
O
3
2)
S :3 r.
C) -D CD
N E
O 3
CU
i
3 mjo
P1Enri ronmen1aN2012 � P1nee La1019Q
F.—T.— 7. Lid., M.. —d

z
o
�
�
d
�
z
�
N
6
��v3cNi,mNy�
o�
m�N
fD (p O C. N 7 0
L
m m- m
g3'am
CD
_ --o
-u
Z.
s
c
c
Di cn
cn
cD
a- Q
a
=3
a)co
o
Q.
CL
_
_Q
TI
z
ul
( (DD
c(D
:
CD
.�
to
_u
a
cn
CQ
o
_0
G
Q
O
J
�%
A)
O
n
�C
=
_
0
3
3
o
rD
rD
+ r!
N
p
O
O
O
O
tU
a
.,�
(D
3
C
3
-G
7J
O
'C
�
a
3
-G
nN
3
.
to
N
O
N
N
N
-'G
0-
O
v
tv
Q)-0
co
cu
7
p
n+
-<
3
O
6Q
CD
O
o
d
o
fD
0-
N
a
O
O
o
3
Z
3
o
�
�,
—
�
o
Ol
-p
0
Ql
-p
ro
0
�
N
�
p
0
�
rD
p
N
-O
rD
O
W
-�
a
A
�
o
O
w
ro
ro
m
nZ3
CD
m
O
ro
r3-r
m
r7-.
ro
m
O
rD
o
-d
ro
O
a
ro
O
-0
(D
O
-o
°
o
is
ro
o
N
N
N
QN
ro
rn
-O
M
N
'i..
y
�
N
YS�i
r
1'
O
oQ
CL
m
o
rD
ro
o
o
rD
CD
— CD.rD(Dv
ro
d
Q
Q
3
v
0)
N
N
L'
N
r
d
ro
CM
m
m
a
3
f0
rD
a—
ro
ro
ro
CD
M
Q
o-
ro
0_
0-
a
a
0_
v
Q
p
r
v
M
M
:::5'
Q
CL
rD
O_
Y +,
i
w�
D
D
D
D
n
D
nLA
-
2
-C
Vi
0
u,
O
Q
r,�,
O
W
Ul
O
to
-71,14
m
Z.
O
N
W
DO
N
OO
c.n
W
N
F-'
O
N
O
M
- +
N
N
N
jv
N
6/
S.J �"�►.
q
t ` .
ck
a
,1
Cl)o J
La
c
CD o
CD
T.
,
n c CD
C(DC
z
PIZ'
Z� m
cn
O
0
O
3 � �
lD
y.
N
O
7
Or
P9Envaonmenlal12012 . Proleclsl0180 - Palustnne - REV. Swilt Creek�GIStReporl FiguressFlgure B ', .....,o.P. '.1.,,:. •d

7
rl
C
m
LO
s$
§
2
J }
T\
§
/
®
G;/
*
q
a ¥ CL
_
E
®
E
T
m
\
=
/
m
/
EL\
0 /
ƒ /
ƒ
\
<
/
/
ƒ
G
@
o
y
e
\
%
/
°
Q
t
@
ƒ
\
/
\
2
\\e
\0
CD
�
g
/2\
m2
° °
z\\
/
3 j
ƒ
oI/
CD
\ /
�
\
CL

0
�t,GfA
■ o •.:�- .'tea- a�
_JL� -
a>a) m 3wrom
3 � � W CD CD
0
fD
m •y n
C r N
N0
CD
CD n 0 0 O
m
C
7�
6
C C "0 � C, C
C
C
x
C
1�
ch
CL
Q SL G1
0 Q D @ CD
3
C)
C1i n
D n
CD m m _ �� M
CD
ff
=
y m
ro
�m�'�
(o
fD (:D
am�
Cn
N�
2
rn j m ro
CD
I ffl
'�
co
y
v
CD
_
�fiC)�°i�� (�
3
m z
(D
m
iv
.�
O
z
�,
OC CD
Q
ro �. N CD
=9an
+
<n
CD
W
W
CD
a ro ro ,n_„
Ul
w�Cwr.a??
nRo,<wZn
r-
m
3-C
� �
N
N L7
O
°(DcD
� 77
� C
o m
n
0 o' 3
=r = F�
co
C)-0CD
0
W w
o
C
C
0
W
ED
- � 1 i=
\ti.Iv Q
GI - - F—IL,
�
' 4
vco
..i Mom. ,.•
%`
Ail
1
• r.
d .
Y
_
;•r
r.� 1
'ti
f�
a
C
0 0 0 0© a
o fl o 0 o
c
c
c
c c
rD M
w Ou
n n n n n n n n n
s s s = 3=r s
n n n n n
T s 3 S s
I
7�
7-
I Y
W D w' v m
O.
w KJ IWL O (ND 000 (D WOl
v/ 1� W N r
^'
'�'
Q. C �
T
�+
OU
Z Z Z
o o O
m
D
J O� N
C
o
�
m
m
-
D
/
CD
o
m
to
61
(D
C
1
­sv
ti
Q
-6
C C C
i
O
fD
M
tD
m
— rD o o O
m
C
7 7
n
-1 Dr ro m rD (D M m
of
v `
a v' a [a n m
ri hr .
n a �-
(D B
CA
3
D
r � m
2 (O N �••� r n tv (n I�rjv} r.. �c-
Q1 WW N W A N N W N N A l--• (.�J J Q1 W c-• In A 00 l0 W J IV ` I ] J 1 n CD
V„I 01 W ((nn 1� A W J lD (!1 W AA Op V W cn CO ­! oo In F� O 0o r 10 m
Ul W N O J A N J (D m r W rn w 0 f--• W
D D 1 T T Ti T _n T T T n -n -R m T T T T T T T D D> m Q s
n n T D (D fD N (D (D fD (D (D , (D rD fD D J rD (D (D D n n f1 rr r1
rp (D (D m (D (D m (D fD fD (D [D fD N F+ re rD (D (D rD D �`� }.>• 4 r Q .!
fD(D .••� r-s .r .+ rr .* .+ r+ .� .+ .+ r+ .� 00 .-r r♦ e•► r+ N (D
vL 1`Ue+ ll _
n _n( CD
'. Lnumnmenta82012 . Projects10380 - Palusuins -REV. Swift CreekZISAeood FloureslFicure lo. Aai,i - Resources Mao —d

o
>v
Q
E
�
o
O
N
m
o
Z.
D
a
OD
(71
0
m
y
0 0
CD
...�
=
n
W
>
7
jA cp 1 i/i
CD
CD
CD
CD
a
�
--
�'
w
(D CD
CL
0-p=
m
1
2
w
n �
ED
m
,�
m
C
0
ILn
n CD n m
Ll
m
a
`�
a
w
°
3
=
o
o
=
T!
3
0
CD
N
CD
0
0
0
.�
o.
O
CD
a
7
Q
-
O
@
CD
m
cn
CO
is FA- .� �•
r ■
T
m
Cfl
�
CD0 �]
C
CD
3-0
iS O
1
(D 3
o °
m m
r
E.
rt
Z w m
0
0s3
3
3 3
(D
3
w
C
O 3
O
�
CDrD
+
E;
x
CD
rD
=
E;
X
fD
O
2
m
v
0
C)
rD
co
o
Q
=
D
07Q
n
r-+
-
CD
�
rF
n
W
o
rD
o
o
CL
�,
—
Q
rD
g
-n
`�
3
(D
o
n
n
n
rD
cu
TQ
rD
s c: 1;
1 `r � � �*.r `.a;�' ♦ ,� lam' b r
�L
Y
1'
i �`d • , �'
D
•^'�'!'�
0
CD
c�
CD
PAEnvuonmentalN2012 , Propcw0180 Pal-vi- REV Swift CreeklG&Repoo Rgur-Tigure It. Plan[ Communities Map.—d

0
0
o
c
Q
CD
z
f
E
o
*$
I
G)
CID
/
� \
\
/
®�
>�
a
e
/
}
CDo
$
n
$
gk
\
$
§ 2
§
\
ƒ
D
/
CA
ƒ
0
/
�
Q.
? =
3
0
Q
3
0-0
0�
c m m
§ro
_ .
?3
z�f
o
k
%R\
2 2
o�ƒ
a)
= E
\o
M
/
w_=_az:wn._w -REV _ate __,_mig_ 12.PholographLow _ _

❑ 0
it
l ,
cm
c =
..(1)
D
cn
cn
=
cn
O
cn
u
^
-�
co M
c�
W
CL
c
3
Ul
y m
M
y �
n m
1D
1
-0
ou
O
CIO
—
C
C
(D
Q
y CO)
c�
a
3
7 �'
y n
C W
�
n
�
C
M
(DD
CD 0
y G
O
F
fp
�
1
O
w
C
7
M
CD
Q
o
i
m'
y
N
y
x
N
�
�
N
N
N
N
G
y
7
C
O
�
O
f
T.
G
e
h ry fi � �• ' • �lb, t� �, � j � �' `' + II ['� r � .� f' •+ � ` r� y. j �_ .i
•,,lp ! ,,
I IS
lb
4(1
IS
am
f-
� �j �•�,f j, 1
it ♦ �
� • t
♦ ' r� „ • yet,
•� � y ti
o -
J?
rA.F /
P1Pnur••n menia1�J111J • P.nwr-Iwl(110.11 . Pali•cw'inw _ RFV Sw AI frwa4 t(;ISV2 wool Fini.rwsl F'n��rw 13a. CJtval Rwsnu.ces Ail ao m"d

O
A
m
F
m
�
N
O
C
m
D
O
y
1
e �.
O
•
■
r
ro
C
�
m
c
x
*
Q
m
cn *
C
O
r
r
n
E
w 5
00
0
M
n
X
�
m
m
m
D 0
(p C
C)
m
m
m
cn
cn
n
m
_�
77
T
3:
r
�
D
p
J
c)
O
�
9
>_
m
lz
X1
D
3
O
cn
Z
O
z
cn
C�
m
CD
y N
n
O
O
CD
O
3
'
N o
W
N Rr
v
CD
CD
n
c
CD
�
= c
0 -+
7
l
(D C
O
�
0) -9
cn �1
O
N
7 ' �P
vi O
O
d
N
i,_ninon—tat.2012+PrC'MW0180-Palustr--REV.S-11Creek'GIS1Rap.t FiguraslFigure 13b. CJtural s M,; n-

_.
a'v
a
o
�
N
�
�
N
{
c
m
M
O
O
N
CJ7
0
z
C�
n
r` 7
R,
r
®
r
0
I
®0
CD
o0
dl
:p
N
(p
1 "O CD
W
L7.
W
CA
Q
T
�i
Ul �
cow
L
oa 3
D?
aj
w3
O
cO
D� a
a
o
ai
��
r�
`,
Dm
0 co
mW:
=� ai
�v
�m
o
�cn
�(
mC
�(n
mFD
0
w
3
cc'
cep'
a
3
m
o
m
3
°:
w
m
fD O
j
O
:3N
i
O
7
`C
:2 C7
o
O
O
CD
y
C_n
=
D1
O
CD
:3(D
o
w
a
:3=
0
m
N
-n
(Q
CD
O
CD
O
�
J
c,
a;
;
�m
o
O
� �
Z
<D
-0 .�.,
O
^�
o
CD
O
CD
10)
w
7C
LA
z z
z
z
z
;o
z
z
zom
O O
l7
O
O
D
<➢
O
O
O
rn
m
z
D
n
D
D<<<
➢
0 0
0
0
0
C
o
0
0
c
c
=�
"
°0
D
D
C O
I--�
01
U1
A
O
Z
F+
F+
V
A
Z
O
m
Q
N
1-•
F'
m Z
W O
Z
N
F+
Z
it
➢
➢
r
D
a
w
D
-4
m
3
v
-
z
A
Z
➢
m
D
r
r
n LA
^
m
1
m m
m y
0<
N
10
�,
N
m
D
n"
W
�`^'
= O
o
N
w
z O
r
G➢i
G➢i
O
C
z
m
m
m
^
➢
v O
O
-
G1
L1
G1 3
m Z
CC
C
m
Z
z
'� r
O n
_
-�
-
n
z
•�
m
O
Gl
m
O
m G1
$ D
z
m
A GI
-i
Z
v1
to
V1
In
v
-�
r.l
n+
N
m
2
1,
D D
F+
N
1.+
F+
C m
> r
Q
to
to
t!1
0
Q
m
-
0 0
z
N
N
o
N
0
A
y
1
C
z
D
m
O
1
--c O
O D
p
G1
0
O
m
Gi
r
Z r
p
n
r
n
D
O
Z
y
r
O
n
r
D
�
z '
m
cti3
0
0
z
0
z
v
Q
v
O
v
00
m Gl
C
tt
N
r
O
C
3
3
z Z
z
a)
C�
o
a
D
W ?1
O
Vi
O
Op
O
O
71
N
O
O
V,
V
0
�W
00
W
1�+
Fes+
p
O
N
O
AA
A
N
A
Z
O
01
Gl
,
fZ'1
f1
fZ'1
G1
C1
G1
r �
z
m
n
m
n
z
z
z
z o
z
ka
W �
1 cr
ID
c
r

�
P
o
<
j
v
F
o
p
cc
O
N
0
N
0
m
Da
o
O
'a
y
a m
1Ar
wm
A=
V —
pa
C31 mD)
Noo
AO W
p�
61
A WS.
A
W
W -.
U1 C2
O
WS
••
R.
O
�^�
W
om�
n-o
N
oEp
oo1A
W JC
cDiom
O
��[o
v-9
-n(n
�N
v`�
�N CDS m
3 O ofD mCD
ID O
V C
v
1D �
y
-.;c
y
C
y
N
v
1
N
w
9CD
1
O
3
CD
NCD
O
W
O
N
`G
(D 7
Z n
T
(D
O
CD
7
O
N
CD
O
N O
7
7
p
CD CD
M
f
7
1n
CLLi
0
>�
Q
1
O
�
CD
`D
m
i,-
'D
o .�;
.�• C
0
Nr 0
p1 (D
R
r
CD
�•
l^
!
O
C
cr
r« 1T
V
r iu
�
Z
Low CD
CD 1
o
-13
C
p
M
flw cop0 c O m C O m C C
Da OD D7 A< z Z-04�'
-n —woD *+ 7zr r!
a :0 LA
O O O O O
" O r^ O q
w w m aD m z a 7 CO v z �
C OD o o D � B4.
s z
m
0 2 v v v v
4 70 9 70 A r--� m m "'1 m m
> m m m m m r� to rn O � Ul D
r O m m m m m -�
� m < < < < < N � � �, A -0 n 70
y$ D g>> m D
g D 1� d O
O O O O O Z V Z Z z r
z z z z z
O m
W m
T Do N O N Y DD rl m
m -4(D F-r O I-� pD v j� N A > V1
:7 CDtD t, N ~ DD W Un rn X 'O
-,z
4 1v
) c
n W F+ W 1D a W A cn CIO IQf� A OW
T
OD N pVp A W N w > FM
z -4 O W W 00 N N W V U, m Z} //
N W W O rD N V W-
m`/ —Jr
v' to O O O ` ou y.r F, F+ 0 O 0 L.
m z J
>_ o ~ p 0 0 7° °T\ O
O
O; m o o p
z C
' =1 rr- ;rl
O OO OOp OOp OOp O Ccyo1I cwcnD O w A F+ w-
O':. CD W N b m Gl L z N
m D O
1? m
o K O
o a o Ln w a o w m a z m O y1_ '
V 1... V l0 DD W 0
N
-Ni,
�
� J w
rr
r,
t
` 1
b C
C `C
I
-
1
w'.
3
m
CIS �:qrN -
n
n - .
w
PAL—ronnientalt2012. Proleclst0180 - Paiustrine - REV. Swnt Greek�GISTlopon FiguresTig— 14b. M,I.galion Work Plan.mzd

p
A
O
�
�
o
Q
m
o
�
a
;
�
0
I
R C
i
0
y
l
22
�'0 m
�
-�
m
°
1 cn
a,
2
0
a
o
ao
0
j cn
cn
wm
rn0
i
w 3
'�
N
N
n
n
cDi = Cl
Da
D�
ai
r�
01
a
�� a
Dcl,
co
T
m W
m
m
cu =
CL
vrn.D
co
� �
-n
3
D
m c
ca
(D F
cn
�
`N
v�
v p1
m
�
N
CA K
T
m
CD
c7i
"
ni
d
3
v
_.
cc
CD
N
n
..
V ca
a
v
m
ma)
3
3
�,
m
m
O
m
rroii O
O
.�.
CDa
N
'•�[
2 n
O
3
o
m
o
m
3
to
�;,
o'
co
w
O
?
O
C
a
O
;IL
m
Q
(n Cl)
co-)C
-o
m
o
0
LA.
. \ I
0
o
sD
rt
0
�7C
0�01
m tn
o
0
w CD
wCO
m a
w
o I.
3 rt
B a
CD Cl)
CD
0
m
N 'C
61
o �.
` 1
1
•
A
a
\
\
cr
1! 1l
NPRI
l7 LY
CD
� ....r .T.'.�.Pmwrlc1f11 fill. P�I�.clr'nw.RFV Cwif.i s :Ii}lp��x .ii�rHc,V �. i. _ �i=..� l.::AGE C.
k!',
r
J�5

)o
�
v
o
E
o
�
p
�
A
�
N
-
�
O
�
o
a
1
OCD
77 z N
r
r
O
v
(q
o
g
(n
�, g
SD
!.
Dz °
O
m
2
G)
Q-
rn:E�
w:E
(�
Q
N
Ln
D n
m
OZ
D
v
m
��
N77
Q-
U)
n
n�
CD
N D
Cl)
`
w
N
cn
CD
CL
S
m
0
3
N. 0
m
Q` -M%
CD
o
0
--o
�CD
Z
CD
o
9 +
O
'O
o
(C
-a
s

G) "�
<
i (CCn
Cn
O O
�1•% O
o
J C
Ln
wN
a
N o °m
o m cn
v, C)
D (7
a
v0 a-
D�
CD
CD
-p
CD
d
N
.ON
O a
W
cfl
d
7 `2
O 7
N
CD
O
O. CD
7 7
=
O
M.
`<
Ca
7
C
O
CD
CD
C
(D
Cn
U)
C3
YY • ir.• 'Y• . � J
:aI . � � � � : - -• • 11 � -
l ' .
N
-0 *
9 -n
m
o
O
O _
3
N
r:
n
CD
y
C
E
-
Z
o
CQ cD
rt -1
0
O 'a
O
:
-V
W CD
CD
fy
w
�
Ili
La
(70(D
rn
O
j co
(JlCv
W CD
A=
m
�!'_
D p 0
•0CncN
tO C) 0
AOw
-• p �
� Wv
�•
r3
c,
co CL
�7
Q7
`JN1F
W 1 d
N�jm
"�
-�ncn
m
��
DC1
>Q.
> :3
N7
Dorn
p7
�'
... (n
m
m
N 7"
m
V7
(D
CD p
O
CD
0)
CD
v CD
v (D
CD
-4
CD
CJ
V+
7
CD
o
o
o
CD
cnCD
7
r*
n
2
m
o
rn °:
O
.�
7
7
O
N
7
�
0
C
40 ry
_ ...~. i-
.•' _
_.-_ ;��
Jam..
f'
1_
•'•
P,1Env,wr—taf,2012 • P,L a:ts101B0 Palustr— REV. Swill Craek'�G fS Viepol FiguroslF gure 17. Proposed M—bring Plan Man.—d

APPENDIX B
DRAFT SITE PROTECTION

MODEL CONSERVATION EASEMENT
January 18, 2001
Rev'd October 16, 2002
Rev'd August, 2003
Model Conservation Easement for use in preserving mitigation property. Language in
italics is instructional, and should be deleted when site -specific Conservation Easement
is prepared.
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this
day of , 200_ by and between ,
("Grantor") and (Grantee).
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine
or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in County, North Carolina, more particularly
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is [either a public body of this state, an agency of the United
States, or a nonprofit corporation or trust whose purpose is the conservation of property],
and is qualified to be the Grantee of a conservation easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 121-35;
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural
communities: [describe by wetland and/or stream type, as well as any associated buffers
or upland communities]. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain
wetland and/or riparian resources and other natural values of the Property, and prevent
the use or development of the Property for any purpose or in any manner that would
conflict with the maintenance of the Property in its natural condition.
[ For use when the mitigation is offered for impacts of a single individual or
general permit use] WHEREAS, the preservation of the Property is a condition of
Department of the Army permit Action ID issued by the Wilmington
District Corps of Engineers, required to mitigate for unavoidable stream and/or wetland
impacts authorized by that permit. Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of
enforcement shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District

(Corps, to include any successor agencies), and that these rights are in addition to, and do
not limit, the rights of enforcement under said permit.
[Alternate paragraph for use when the conservation easement supports a
mitigation bank] WHEREAS, the preservation of the Property is required by a Mitigation
Banking Instrument for the [Name of Bank], Department of the Army Action ID [Action
ID number for the mitigation bank]. The Mitigation Bank is intended to be used to
compensate for unavoidable stream and/or wetland impacts authorized by permits issued
by the Department of the Army. Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of
enforcement shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
(Corps, to include any successor agencies), and that these rights are in addition to, and do
not limit, the rights of the parties to the Mitigation Banking Instrument.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby
unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors
and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Property described on Exhibit A,
together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I.
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This conservation Easement is an
easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,
Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Property inconsistent with the purpose of this
Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Property shall be preserved in its natural
condition and restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the
conservation values of the Property.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses
are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Property or any introduction of non-native
plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building,
mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display,

antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or
permanent structure or facility on or above the Property.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any right of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Property are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting
or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation on the Property.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways
on the property; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.
G. Sim No signs shall be permitted on or over the Property, except the
posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Property,
signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Property
and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the property.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other
materials on the Property is prohibited.
1. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any manner
on the Property, except to restore natural topography or drainage patterns.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration
of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing
or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into, within or out of the
easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters,
springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited. [The Corps
will generally allow the use of vehicles on existing roads provided those roads are

identified by reference to a recorded map showing their location, configuration, and
size.]
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Property which is or
may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Property
substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is
prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the property for all purposes not
inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to
quiet enjoyment of the Property, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish,
and hike on the Property, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Property,
in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
(For use when mitigation work (approved or required restoration, creation, or
enhancement)is to be done on the property]Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions,
Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to construct wetland
and stream mitigation on the Property, in accordance with the [describe mitigation plan
by title, date and permit action id if a single mitigation site; if a mitigation bank, include
the language "detailed mitigation plan approved in accordance with the Mitigation
Banking Instrument for the Mitigation Bank.]
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the
Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of
inspecting said property to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs,
successors, or assigns, is complying with the terns, conditions, restrictions, and purposes
of this Conservation Easement. The Grantee shall also have the right to enter and go
upon the Property for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and
studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public
access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent
any activity on or use of the Property that is inconsistent with the purposes of this
Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Property that may
be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation

Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify
the Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of
such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains
uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by
appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice,
to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach
of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise
materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The
Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee
would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of
the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights
and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The
costs of a breach, correction or restoration, including the Grantee's expenses, court costs,
and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be
responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have the same right to enforce the terms and
conditions of this easement as the Grantee.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or
provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a
subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle
Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Property
resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire,
flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or invitees; or
from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor under emergency conditions to
prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the
Property resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warran . Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property which
have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor further
warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and
arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title
to the Property against the claims of all persons.

B. Subseguent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in
all or a portion of the Property. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such
transfer at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee
agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee
and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof and shall not be amended,
modified or terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the Grantee
hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation
Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C.
Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee
further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that
the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation
purposes described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. This instrument sets forth the entire
agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all
prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation
Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property
free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor. Grantee shall
not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership,
operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to comply with
federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the exercise of the
Reserved Rights.
F. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Property for the conservation purposes, this Conservation Easement
may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
G. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Property is taken in the exercise
of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this
Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time
of such taking to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct
damages due to the taking.
H. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of this Property is sold,
exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise of
eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation

Easement. The parties stipulate that the fair market value of this Conservation Easement
shall be determined by multiplying the fair market value of the Property unencumbered
by this Conservation Easement (minus any increase in value after the date of this grant
attributable to improvements) by the ratio of the value of this easement at the time of this
grant to the value of the Property (without deduction for the value of this Conservation
Easement) at the time of this grant. The values at the time of this grant shall be the values
used, or which would have been used, to calculate a deduction for federal income tax
purposes, pursuant to Section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code (whether eligible or
ineligible for such a deduction). Grantee shall use its share of the proceeds in a manner
consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement.
1. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication
required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified
by notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
[Name, address anti fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name, address and fax number]
To the Corns:
[Name, address and fax number]
I Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's interest
shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an appropriate
proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
K. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a
writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any
applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this grant.
L. [For use if there is a document describing the current condition of the
property. The language provided is applicable if there is a mitigation plan that
accurately describes the current condition and uses of the property. If there is not such a
plan, another document we agree is accurate and can be identified and is in our files can
be referenced.]Present Condition of the Property. The wetlands, scenic, resource,
environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Property, and its current use and
state of improvement, are described in Section _, Appendix B of the Mitigation Plan,

dated , prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and
Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee
have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any future changes
in the use of the Property will be consistent with the terms of this Conservation
Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to
establish the present condition of the Property if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
[Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form)

June 15, 2017
Mr. Norton Webster
Mitigation Advisor
Palustrine Group
P.O. Box 603
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Subject: Present Conditions Report
Swift Creek Mitigation Property
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. 6430-09-005.0011
Dear Mr. Webster
amec
foster
wheeler
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) is pleased to
present this Present Conditions Report for the Swift Creek Mitigation Property, located in Edgecombe
County, North Carolina.
The Swift Creek Mitigation Property (Site) consists of one parcel of land designated as Edgecombe
County Tax Map Number 4812-22-1043 and is 599.93 acres in,size. The Site is located along the
southwestern side of NC Highway 33 NW (NC-33), northwest of the intersection of NC-33 and NC
Highway 97 (NC-97) in Edgecombe County, North Carolina. The site consists of undeveloped
hardwoods, pine forest, agricultural fields, a homestead and a cemetery. The site is accessed from
the driveway of the home at 9117 NC-33. The site is bordered to the north by NC-33, to the east by
agricultural fields, to the south by Swift Creek, and to the west by White Oak Swamp and agricultural
fields.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.IWetlands
Amec Foster Wheeler identified approximately 183.6 acres/22,054 linear feet of jurisdictional waters
of the U.S. within the Site. The following table lists each water of the U.S. within the Site and their
corresponding size. All jurisdictional boundaries are subject to verification by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE).
Table 1: Swift Creek Mitigation Property Wetland & Stream Areas
AREA
FEATURE TYPE
ACREAGE/LINEAR FEET
Wetland No. 1
Jurisdictional Wetland
12.65 Acres
Wetland No. 2
Jurisdictional Wetland
2.43 Acres
Wetland No. 3
Jurisdictional Wetland
0.01 Acres
Wetland No. 4
Jurisdictional Wetland
0.06 Acres
Wetland No. 5
Jurisdictional Wetland
0.34 Acres
Em,ironment & Infrastructure Americas
720 Gracern Road, Suite t32
Columbia, South Carolina 29210
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.amecfw.com

Baseline Documentation Report — Swift Creek Mitigation Property
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Amec Foster Wheeler Project Number 643009004
June 15, 2017
AREA
FEATURE TYPE
ACREAGE/LINEAR FEET
Wetland No. 6
Jurisdictional Wetland
164.81 Acres
Wetland No. 7
Jurisdictional Wetland
3.17 Acres
Wetland No. 8
Jurisdictional Wetland
0.17 Acres
UT - A
Intermittent/Perennial RPW
6,761 Feet
UT - B
Perennial RPW
1,662 Feet
UT - C
Intermittent/Perennial RPW
473 Feet
UT - D
Intermittent/Perennial RPW
2,619 Feet
UT - E
Intermittent/Perennial RPW
582 Feet
UT- F
Perennial RPW
787 Feet
UT - G
Perennial RPW
1,075 Feet
UT - H
Perennial RPW
642 Feet
UT- I
Intermittent/Perennial RPW
477 Feet
UT - J
Perennial RPW
635 Feet
UT-K-1
Perennial RPW
598 Feet
UT - K-2
Perennial RPW
151 Feet
White Oak Swamp
Perennial RPW
2,294 Feet
3,298 Feet
Swift Creek
Perennial RPW
Total
Jurisdictional Wetlands
—183.6 ac./^22,054 LF
Ditch 1
830 Feet
Ditch 2
673 Feet
Ditch 3
700 Feet
Ditch 4
344 Feet
Ditch 5
1,186 Feet
Ditch 6
1,453 Feet
512 Feet
Ditch 7
Ditch 8
_ _
1,496 Feet
Ditch 9
300 Feet
Ditch 10
1,137 Feet
Ditch 11
94 Feet
Ditch 12
158 Feet
Ditch 13
Ditch 14
261 Feet
952 Feet
Ditch 15
2,379 Feet
Ditch 16
694 Feet
Ditch 17
598 Feet
Ditch 18
1,437 Feet
Ditch 19
742 Feet
Ditch 20
86 Feet
Page 2 of 5

Baseline Documentation Report — Swift Creek Mitigation Propery June 15. 2017
Edgecombe County. North Carolina
Amec Foster Wheeler Project Number 643009004
AREA
FEATURE TYPE
ACREAGE/LINEAR FEET
Ditch 21
870 Feet
Ditch 22
867 Feet
Ditch 23
511 Feet
Ditch 24
481 Feet
Ditch 25
789 Feet
Ditch 26
934 Feet
Ditch 27
768 Feet
Ditch 28
2,161 Feet
Ditch 29
247 Feet
Ditch 30
212 Feet
Ditch 31
454 Feet
Ditch 32
570 Feet
Ditch 33
160 Feet
Total Ditches
25,056 LF
Uplands
-409.4 Acres
Total Easement Acreage
-593 Acres
Wetlands within the Site identified in April and May 2017 are all considered preliminary jurisdictional,
associated with Swift Creek, White Oak Swamp and its floodplain. The approximate 183.6 acres of
wetlands are all classified as palustrine forested wetlands, described as riverine swamp, bottomland
hardwood, mixed hardwood, mixed pine -hardwood, and pine forest.
Streams within the Site identified in April and May 2017 are also considered preliminary jurisdictional,
associated with Swift Creek, White Oak Swamp and its floodplain. There are also jurisdictional
ditches, totaling over 25,000 feet, within the Site. In addition, 12 intermittent/perennial streams total
approximately 22,054 linear feet and are located on the western, middle, and eastern portions of the
Site.
Existing Vegetation
Wetland plant communities within the Mitigation Project site were characterized using the North
Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM 2010). Two predominant wetland plant
communities exist within the site: bottomland hardwood forest and riverine swamp forest. The Guide
to the Natural Communities of North Carolina was utilized to characterize the existing upland plant
communities within the Mitigation Project area. Three predominant upland plant communities exist
within the site: mixed hardwood forest, pine forest and mixed pine -hardwood forest. Botanical
taxonomic nomenclature presented below is in accordance with Weakley.
Riverine Swamp Forest
The riverine swamp forest community occurs along the southern and southwestern boundaries of
the Mitigation Project site along Swift Creek. The canopy and shrub strata comprise red maple
(Acerrubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), willow oak (Quercus phellos), cherrybark oak,
Page 3 of 5

Baseline Documentation Report — Swift Creek Mitigation Properh, Jane 15, 1017
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Amee Foster Wheeler Project Number 643009004
(Quercus pagoda), river birch (Betula nigra), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and American
hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana). The groundstory stratum is sparse with scattered occurrence
of Lizard's tail (Saururus cernuus), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and sedges (Carex sp.) and
grasses.
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
The bottomland hardwood forest community occurs throughout the large forested tract in the
southern half of the Mitigation Project site. The canopy and shrub strata include red maple,
sweetgum, sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), river birch,
wax myrtle (Morelia cerifera), possumhaw (Viburnum nudum), and Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense). Black willow (Salix nigra) is also present in depressional pockets. Dense pockets of
Japanese stilt -grass (Microstegium vimineum) occur in the groundstory stratum of some of these
areas. Giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea) and ferns also occupy the groundstory. Lizard's tail and
soft rush are present in depressional pockets.
Mixed Hardwood Forest
The mixed hardwood forest community also occurs throughout the large forested tract in the
southern half of the Mitigation Project area. The canopy and shrub strata comprise a broad
assemblage of species, including water oak (Quercus nigra), sweetgum, mockernut hickory
(Carya albs), sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), black cherry (Prunus
serotina), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), winged elm (Ulmus alata), American beech (Fagus
grandifolia), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginianus), flowering dogwood (Cornus florida),
American holly (Ilex opaca), wax myrtle, and blueberry (Vaccinium sp.). The groundstory stratum
includes muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), yellow jasmine (Gelsemium sempervirens), blackberry (Rubus sp.),
panic grasses (Panicum spp.), broom sedge (Andropogon virginicus), Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica), Virginia -creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), wood -sorrel (Oxalis sp.), and
violets (viola sp.).
Mixed Pine -Hardwood Forest
The mixed pine -hardwood forest community includes many of the plant species that are common
to the canopy, shrub and groundstory strata of the mixed hardwood forest, with the addition of
loblolly pine (Pines taeda) as a canopy and subcanopy associate. These areas occur throughout
the large forested tract in the southern half of the Mitigation Project area.
Pine Forest
Loblolly pine stands are not a dominant community within the southern half of the site. However,
some of these stands contain pine trees with values of diameter at breast height (dbh) that range
from 8 to 16 inches. The understory includes species that are common to the mixed hardwood
forest and mixed pine -hardwood forest communities. No clearcuts or planted pine plantations
occur within the Mitigation Project area.
Agricultural Land Use
Agricultural fields occupy a large portion of the northern half of the site. Some of the fields are
fallow, while others have been recently planted and harvested with corn.
Page 4 of 5

Baseline Documentation Report — Swift Creek Mitigation Property June 15, 2017
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Amec Foster Rieder Project Number 643009004
Existing Infrastructure
The Site is currently utilized for residential and farming activities. The site is accessed from the
driveway of the home at 9117 NC-33 The site is bordered to the north by NC-33, to the east by
agricultural fields, to the south by Swift Creek, and to the west by White Oak Swamp and agricultural
fields. A network of unpaved farm roads is located throughout the Site. A family cemetery is located
near an NC-33 at the northern end of the property. In addition, tree -mounted hunting stands exist
along the forestry roads.
No additional infrastructure or impervious surfaces were identified within the proposed Mitigation Site.
CLOSING
If you have any questions concerning this document, please contact Mr. William Rector at (803) 798-
1200.
Sincerely,
AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Matthew Wi a'
Staff Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Present Conditions Aerial Map
Photograph Log
Photograph Locations Map
William Rector, PE
Senior Water Resources Engineer
Page 5 of 5

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Pdgecombe County, North Carolina
t
PHOTOLOG SHEET
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
Project:643009W4
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: i
b.
Photographer: James Cutler
C _
Description: Looking at riverine
swamp forest located near the
southern boundary of the
mitigation project area, facing
south.
'
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
'
Site name: Swift Creek
°i
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: 2
Photographer: James Cutler
} 9
>r
Description: Looking at
bottomland hardwood forest
located within the southern
portion of the mitigation project
area, facing northwest.
Prepared by: MC 5/1212017
Checked by: TT 511212017
Page 1 of 6

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
Prepared by: ]DC 5/12/2017
Checked by: !T 5/12/2017
Page 2 of 6

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Prepared by:JDC 5/12/2017
Checked by: JT 511212017
Page 3 of 6

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
PHOTOLOG SHEET
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: 7
Photographer: James Cutter
Description: Looking at mixed
hardwood forest within the
central portion of the mitigation
` project area, facing northwest.
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
•
Site name: Swift Creek
1 >R
Mitigation Project Area
Project:643009004
>-
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: 8
Photographer: James Cutler
.:'
Description: Looking at pine
- forest within the western portion
of the mitigation project area,
s facing northwest.
Prepared by: JDC 5/12/2017
Checked by: IT 5/12/2017
Page 4 of 6

Swift Creek— Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
PHOTOLOG SHEET
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: 9
Photographer: James Cutler
Description: Looking at mixed
pine -hardwood forest within the
southern portion of the mitigation
project area, facing northwest.
Client. CSX Transportation, Inc.
•
Site name: Swift Creek
i
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/26/2017
'
Photo #: 10
'+ y
Photographer: James Cutler
- Description: Looking at mixed
pine -hardwood forest (with pine
pocket and open area) within the
western portion of the mitigation
project area, facing west.
Prepared by: JQC 5/12/2017
Checked by: JT 5/12/2017
Page 5 of 6

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
Prepared by: JDC 5/12f2017
Checked by: JT 511212017
Page 6 of 6

�
{
t
(D
cz
m
E E
f
E-0
m
/
rL
%
/
k
m
Z
m x�
/
2 2
2
E
7 C
_
q
/
2
CD
3
m
-n
CL
I@
§ �
2
�/
o
2
C
/
m
;
o
�z
C
\J2
a
:3

z
o
W
N
rn
4
U
Q'
p
m
CD
0
O
C
G
D O
0 Q
0
(O
O
(Q
{n
0
X
ro
CD
n
0
s=
Q
(U
m
0.
� �u
-n
0 of D, cn
( a
(D
O cD
(D
C CD
<�
N O
Z v N
G
;3, O
to
c» m
a m
mvCD
O
�
(D
3
�
�
O
z
_
0
3
s
'g
o
5
g
S
a
4--I.A2012 - Propc[s10127 P4-t, ne G—p PRM-CCKGISU2_Phota_Lo caSors —d

APPENDIX D
PHOTO LOG

Swift Creek— Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
Prepared by: JDC 5/12/2017
Checked by: J7 5/1212017

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
PHOTOLOG SHEET
.• r
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
r Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
+t'
1. Project:643009004
Date: 4/26/2017
4 i r
Photo #: 3
Photographer: James Cutler
Description: Looking at
bottomland hardwood forest
located the
within southeastern
portion of the mitigation project
area, facing northeast.
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
('
',. Project: 643009004
la : f Jr. � ,
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: 4
* \ - Photographer: James Cutler
;:; ' s,
Ann 11�
Description: Looking at
bottomland hardwood forest
Wp(background) and Tributary H
(foreground) located within the
western portion of the mitigation
project area, facing northeast.
i
Beaver dam at tributary -wetland
interface.
N4.
Ki
jlA'i.?,ie
Prepared by: JDC 5/12/2017
Checked by: JT 5/12/2017
Page 2 of 6

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
.AU
PHOTOLOG SHEET
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: 5
Photographer: James Cutler
Description: Looking at
f r"
bottomland hardwood forest and
Tributary A -I located within the
r d
central portion of the mitigation
project area, facing southeast.
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: 6
Photographer: James Cutler
Description: Looking at mixed
hardwood forest and woods road
within the southern portion of the
mitigation project area, facing
north.
Prepared by: JDC 5/12/2017
Checked by: JT 5/1212017
Page 3 of 6

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
Y f
4 s
y
i
}�
i
x
PHOTOLOG SHEET
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/2612017
Photo #: 7
Photographer. James Cutler
Description: Looking at mixed
hardwood forest within the
central portion of the mitigation
project area, facing northwest.
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: 8
James Cutler
Description: Looking at pine
forest within the western portion
of the mitigation project area,
facing northwest.
Prepared by:JDC 5/12/2017
Checked by: JT 5/12/2017
Page 4 of 6

Swift Creek— Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
7;.
2
r �c
YU
PHOTOLOG SHEET
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/26/2017
Photo #: 9
Photographer: James Cutler
Description: booking at mixed
pine -hardwood forest within the
southern portion of the mitigation
project area, facing northwest.
Client: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Site name: Swift Creek
Mitigation Project Area
Project: 643009004
Date: 4/2612017
! Photo #: 10
Photographer: James Cutler
Description: Looking at mixed
pine -hardwood forest (with pine
pocket and open area) within the
western portion of the mitigation
project area, facing west.
Prepared by: JDC 5112/2017
Checked by: JT 511212017
Page 5 of 6

Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Photographic Log
Prepared by: JDC 5/12/2017
Checked by: JT 5/12/2017
Page 6 of 6

APPENDIX E
HYDRIC SOILS EVALUATION

I
Swift Creek Permittee Responsible Mitigation Site .'
Hydric Soils Investigation
Edgecombe County, North Carolina a m e c
March 28, 2017 foster
wheeler
Project Description
Amec Foster Wheeler conducted a preliminary soil investigation to determine the approximate limits of
drained hydric soils within an existing agriculture field (study area). The purpose of this investigation
was to determine the approximate extent of hydric soils that have been drained for previous and ongoing
agricultural activities. The study area is in the northeastern portion of the approximately 600-acre Wilson
Parcel located adjacent to the southern side of N.C. Highway 33, northwest of Leggett, North Carolina.
Amec Foster Wheeler Licensed Soil Scientists completed this investigation on March 7 and 8, 2017.
Methodology
The NRCS Soil Survey of Edgecombe County, North Carolina indicated the presence of one hydric soil
map unit within the study area. Hydric soils or soils that may contain hydric inclusions mapped in the
study area include Roanoke silt loam (Ro). Amec Foster Wheeler advanced hand -auger borings along
transects within the study area to determine the approximate limits of potentially hydric soils present. Pin
flags were placed along the hydric — non-hydric soil line. The pin flag locations were located with sub -
meter GPS technology. The pin flags were removed once located due to ongoing agriculture operations
within the study area.
Summary of Findings
The study area consists of a cultivated agriculture field that is drained by a network of ditches. Seven
ditches ranging in depth from three to four feet deep connect to a larger ditch approximately five feet deep
in the southern portion of the study area. The ditch network drains the study area to the southwest. Based
on field observations and soil profile descriptions, the drained hydric soils within the study area most
closely resemble the Roanoke silt loam (Clayey, mixed, thermic Typic Ochrayuults) soil series. The
hydric soil indicators observed included depleted, low chroma matrices and redoximorphic features
including high chroma concentrations. The drained hydric soils present within the study area meet the
NRCS hydric soil indicator F3 — Depleted (Gray) Matrix. Based on the preliminary hydric soil
delineation, approximately 23.9 acres of drained hydric soils were observed. The soil boring logs are
located in Appendix A and the Figures are located in Appendix B.
This preliminary soil investigation to determine the approximate limits of drained hydric soils is a
planning grade evaluation. This level of evaluation is not suitable for the development of a wetland
restoration plan.

Lri A
w
w
N
rn
o
p
c^ m
o f+
A
00
O
N
-a v
O
N
N
O -.Coo
0
o{
o
O
j
\ \
N F�
\
F,
\
\
N
an
X
u
co
0
0
C
VV,
0
O O O O O n
A
V1 Vl to Vl V1 CC,,
INlololol 1 19
O O O 0
m 7 7 7 7
n n v 0 n n
m rD rD rD
7 7 7 7
v p' v d
0 0
7 7 7 7
n
x x X X )C O
�n[r�fN'1I jf�'flpl�lrl�
-O tl-I �d- kltl
F N
rp C
in
C�
A
Vl
W
W
W
N
N
N
lU
N
O
N
Ol
M
A
W
N
N
µ
N
O
O
N
W
N
b
S
0
CD
F+
0{{
F,
N
0
{ N
o
0
r
o
�
V1
VI
�
N
In
N
VI
A
�
Y
N~
1\+
F\+
F\+
N
N
1
00
v
Ln
ul
00
L
0
V
a
0
inC
O
m
A
A
m
A\
m
1
A
N
In
Vt
In
N
V,
0
7
0
7
0
7
O
7
O
7
O
7
O
7
m
m
rrD
m
m
m
m
�
v
a
v
v
d
v
fD
0
7
0'
7
0
7
0'
7
o
7
o'
7
0
7
x
X
x
x
X
X
X
°
°
O
O
O
a
O
m
r
r
r
r
r
M
7
or
N
N
N
N
x
N
<
<
3
c
F
c
rD
a
Ln
w
N
.CD w A tQ A Q p tn ~ rrD
F+
O lD 01 A Vl �
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
Vt
w
N
In
W
A
°
v
X
OD
to
J
O
tD
to
Do
O
t0
d
O
F�
O
F-
O
0
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
n
cn
In
V1
Vl
In
In
O
m
m
A
m
m
L�
LQ
tn
In
O
O
O
3
0
0
0
0
0
x
7
7
7
7
7
Dmmmmm
d
;0
7
7
7
7
7
<
CD
rL
a
a
a
or
m
n'
m
o
x
X
0
0
0
0
0
p
7
7
3
7
9
v
n.
.mar
n
x
X
x
X
X
°
7
a
a
a
y
O
Hm
m
m
7
fD
tD
fD
r
C
nn(A�
r
r
r
ro
a
ro
�
C Z
F+ n
F+ 118,
d d d °
Z
L, v n0 n
C Z
61
n w
n m
y K
o
m
m m
y a
n
m
rD
N\\ 7
7 7
ry ..
S
1)
S
O
~
n n .a. rD
On 7 7 O 3
°
'
y .tea-. .^a.
,a.' 0' 0
O
7
7 7 a
a s
(D
3
O
3
S
<
[C
d m
S
<
0 0-
a
'� NO
m
v7i u7i
ID
�
eD
O.
ID rD C
N
X n
n
a
a
tD
7'
a
d f
M
>•
a
X rai
-O
S
a
0
N
f
O f
a
f
a
a
� n
a
a
a
CL
c 'o
F
3 fD
E
F
a
IT
a
a
^»
o
f
t
g
H
S
O
N
N
N
°
7

P:1Transpnrtntinn\Projects\RaiRCSKCentral Carolina Intermodal FacilitylGISIGIS_Working%Palustdne_Mitigation Site\Mitigation_Site.mxd, User jason.hightower; Date: 2/712017 12:40:08 PM, Checke by: RGH Date: 115117

-- --
r
IN
� '�,. '�`',AE'►'--��' � r LSD'. • r
1 t• ,w � �� ` f Mti
°! 14 .
jig
�r alb �•`�. �\
+r _ .� _ !pie' 15r��� , �• . _ - `\_
,-.
P:\Transportation\Projects\RaihCSMCentral Carolina intermodal Facility\GIS\GIS_Working%Palustrine_Mitigation SitelMitigation_Site.mxd, User. jason.hightower. Date: 2/7/2017 12:40:08 PM, Checke by: RGH Date: 115/17

APPENDIX F
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

amec
foster
wheeler
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel
Edgecombe County, North Carolina 27886
Prepared for:
Mr. Tommy Cousins, PWS
Vice President
Palustrine Group
PO Box 71795
North Charleston, South Carolina 29415
Prepared by:
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, NC 27703
February 3, 2017
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Copyright © 2017 by Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
All rights reserved.

amec
foster
wheeler
February 3, 2017
Mr. Tommy Cousins, PWS
Vice President
Palustrine Group
PO Box 71795
North Charleston, South Carolina 29415
Subject: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
SWIFT CREEK MITIGATION PARCEL
EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 27886
PROJECT NO.: 6250170127.01.01
Dear Mr. Cousins:
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. is pleased to present this Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment for the above -referenced property located in Edgecombe County,
North Carolina. We appreciate the opportunity to serve you on this project. If you have any
questions or desire further information, please feel free to contact us at [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
Sarah Levine
Staff Scientist
Attachment
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27703
Licensure: NC Engineering F-1253; NC Geology C-247
Vicki Garlington
Senior Project Manager
Tel — [phone]
www.amecfw.com
02017 Amec Foster Wheeler. All Rights Reserved.

.1
Mitigation Property, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment amec
foster
wheeler
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY..........................................................................................................
IV
1.0
INTRODUCTION
.............................................................................................................1
1.1
Purpose...............................................................................................................1
1.2
Detailed Scope of Services..................................................................................2
1.3
Significant Assumptions.......................................................................................3
1.4
Limitations, Exceptions, Special Terms, and Conditions......................................3
1.5
User Reliance......................................................................................................4
2.0
SITE
DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................5
2.1
Location and Legal Description............................................................................5
2.2
Site and Vicinity General Characteristics.............................................................5
2.3
Current Site Usage..............................................................................................5
2.4
Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties ............................................. .........5
3.0
PHYSICAL SETTING......................................................................................................7
3.1
Topography..........................................................................................................7
3.2
Soils.....................................................................................................................7
3.3
Groundwater........................................................................................................7
4.0
USER -PROVIDED INFORMATION.................................................................................8
4.1
Title Records........................................................................................................9
4.2
Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations............................................9
4.3
Specialized Knowledge........................................................................................9
4.4
Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information...............................9
4.5
Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues.....................................................9
4.6
Reason for Performing Phase I ESA....................................................................9
4.7
Other....................................................................................................................9
5.0
ENVIRONMENTAL
RECORDS REVIEW......................................................................10
5.1
Standard Environmental Records Sources.........................................................10
5.1.1 Orphan Sites List....................................................................................10
5.2
Additional Environmental Record Sources.........................................................10
6.0
HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW...............................................................................11
6.1
Local City Directory ............................................................................................11
6.2
Aerial Photographs............................................................................................11
6.3
Historical Topographic and Street Maps............................................................13
6.4
Fire Insurance Maps..........................................................................................13
6.5
Previous Reports or Records of Proceedings.....................................................13
6.6
Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties.............................................13
7.0
SITE
RECONNAISSANCE............................................................................................14
7.1
Methodology and Limiting Conditions.................................................................14
7.2
General Site Setting...........................................................................................14
7.3
Buildings and Structures....................................................................................14
7.4
Aboveground Storage Tanks.............................................................................15
7.5
Underground Storage Tanks..............................................................................15
7.6
Odors.................................................................................................................15
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page

I
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment amec
foster
wheeler
7.7 Pools of Liquid...................................................................................................15
7.8 Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons.....................................................................................15
7.9 Drums................................................................................................................15
7.10 Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Product Storage Containers ...................15
7.11 Unidentified Substance Containers....................................................................15
7.12 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)......................................................................15
7.13 Water Intrusion..................................................................................................16
7.14 Stains or Corrosion............................................................................................16
7.15 Drains, Sumps, or Other Discharge Features.....................................................16
7.16 Stained Soil/Pavement or Stressed Vegetation..................................................16
7.17 Solid Waste or Fill Dirt.......................................................................................16
7.18 Wastewater........................................................................................................16
7.19 Wells..................................................................................................................16
7.20 Septic Systems..................................................................................................16
7.21 Wet Areas or Surface Water Bodies...................................................................16
8.0
INTERVIEWS................................................................................................................17
9.0
FINDINGS.....................................................................................................................18
10.0
OPINION.......................................................................................................................20
11.0
CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................22
12.0
DEVIATIONS AND DATA GAPS..................................................................................23
13.0
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................24
14.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S).....................................25
15.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S).................................26
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page H

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase / Environmental Site Assessment amec
foster
wheeler
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
TABLES
Table 1
Site Utilities
Table 2
Adjoining Properties
Table 3
Information Obtained from User Questionnaire
Table 4
Chain of Title Documentation Summary
Table 5
Street Directory Search Results
Table 6
Aerial Photograph Search Results
Table 7
Historical Topographic Map Search Results
Table 8
Summary of Interviews
FIGURES
Figure 1
Site Location Map
Figure 2
Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3A
Site Features Map
Figure 3B
Site Features Map — Wilson House Detail
APPENDICES
Appendix A Edgecombe County Tax Assessor Documents
Appendix B EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck®
Appendix C User Provided Questionnaires
Appendix D EDR Historical Reports
Appendix E Site Photographs
Appendix F Resumes
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page iii

I.
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina '44
Phase ! Environmental Site Assessment dmec
foster
wheeler
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) was retained by
Palustrine Group to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property
addressed as 9117 NC Highway 33 NW, Edgecombe County, North Carolina (herein referred to
as the site). The site, identified as North Carolina tax parcel number (PIN) 4812-22-1043, consists
of one parcel measuring 599.93 acres and is owned by Franklin Wilson Jr. The Study Area is
depicted on the topographic map presented as Figure 1. The configuration of the site and
properties in the vicinity of the site are depicted on Figure 2.
Amec Foster Wheeler performed this Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations
of ASTM International (ASTM) Standard E 1527-13 and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) Rules.
The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to identify known environmental conditions or concerns
associated with the site. The assessment included the identification of recognized environmental
conditions (RECs) associated with the site. RECs do not include de minimis conditions that
generally do not present a material risk of harm to human health or the environment and that
generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of
appropriate governmental agencies.
This Phase I ESA is intended to be used by Palustrine Group, subject to the terms and conditions
of the contract between Palustrine Group and Amec Foster Wheeler.
The results of our Phase I ESA are summarized below.
Site History
Based on a review of reasonably ascertainable records, the site was first developed as early as
1954 with a cemetery and residential buildings. The site has been primarily developed as
agricultural land or remained undeveloped since as early as 1954.
Site Reconnaissance
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was occupied by agricultural land, undeveloped
woodland, a cemetery, and various structures. Onsite structures/improvements included an
occupied single -story house (Wilson house) with a well house, barn and shed, an unoccupied
single -story house, a concrete cellar, a livestock pen and well house, and deer stands.
Environmental Records
Review of the federal, state and tribal (if appropriate) records, including a proprietary records
summary provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), a third -party provider of
environmental and land use records, indicated that no properties of environmental concern are
located within the respective ASTM standard search distances for each category.
Findings and Opinions
The following environmental concerns were identified during the completion of this Phase I ESA:
Two 1,000-gallon above ground storage tanks (ASTs) were observed at the site. One AST
was located at the Wilson house and was labeled as containing liquefied petroleum gas.
The second AST was located at the livestock pen and appeared to be an abandoned
liquefied petroleum gas tank. No staining or stressed vegetation was observed around the
ASTs.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page iv

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment amec
foster
wheeler
• Piping and a concrete pad associated with an underground storage tank (UST) were
observed south of the Wilson house. The size, age, and contents of the UST are unknown.
• Two water supply wells were observed at the site, near the Wilson house and near the
livestock pen.
• Four open -top, four -foot diameter, concrete cisterns were observed at the site, one at the
Wilson house and three near the livestock pen.
• Two partially full gas cans and two buckets containing used oil were observed near the
Wilson house and barn.
• Solid waste and debris including but not limited to household trash, empty drums,
construction debris, tires, farm equipment, empty oil and pesticide containers, and scrap
metal were observed on the site. Large areas of solid waste (more than 100 square feet [sq
ft]) were observed in the northwestern wooded portion of the site and near the Wilson house.
• Three pole -mounted transformers were observed on the northern adjacent property. Non -
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) labels were observed on the transformers. No staining or
corrosion was observed on the transformers, and the ground and vegetated surfaces at the
base of the pole in the vicinity of the transformer did not appear to be stained or stressed.
• An interview with the property owner's agent identified the presence of an approximately
1,200-gallon septic tank at the Wilson House.
• An interview with the property owner's agent indicated the potential presence of lead based
paint (LBP) at the Wilson House.
• Based on the construction date of the Wilson house (1961), it is possible that asbestos
containing materials (ACMs) are present in building materials onsite.
Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA, Amec Foster Wheeler offers the following opinions for
the site:
• Staining was not observed on ground surfaces in the vicinity of the two ASTs and the ASTs
appeared to be of sound condition. As a result, the ASTs do not constitute a release of
petroleum products or hazardous substances and are not considered to be a REC.
• The presence of a UST at the Wilson house of unknown age, size, and contents constitutes
conditions indicative of a release of petroleum products or hazardous substances.
Therefore, the UST is considered to be a REC.
• Two water supply wells were observed at the site. Wells provide a direct connection from
the ground surface to subsurface aquifer that, in the event of a spill, could be an
environmental concern. However, at present, spills are not known to have occurred in the
vicinity of the wells and therefore the presence of the wells at the site does not constitute
the release of petroleum products or hazardous substances. As a result, the presence of
wells in the Study Area is not considered to be a REC.
• The cisterns observed onsite were likely used to containerize water and/or feed for livestock.
The presence of the cisterns on the property is not considered to be a REC.
• Two partially full gas cans and two buckets containing used oil were observed near the
Wilson house and barn at the time of site reconnaissance. The containers were not stored
in secondary containment but the amount of petroleum product would not produce a
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page v

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Amec
foster
wheeler
significant impact to the environment if released. Therefore, they are considered a de
minimis condition and not a REC.
Solid waste and debris was observed on the site. Ground surfaces in the vicinity of solid
waste and debris did not appear to be stained and the materials did not appear to be the
source of a release. The waste and debris are identified as a housekeeping issue that may
require coordination for proper disposal with a general subcontractor. Based on field
observations during the assessment, at present, the waste and debris do not constitute a
release of petroleum products or hazardous substances at the site and therefore are not a
REC. However, if significant staining is observed during removal, the waste and debris may
be considered a REC in the future.
• Three pole -mounted transformers were observed on the northern adjacent property. Non -
PCB labels were observed on the transformers, and the transforms were free of staining
and corrosion. Therefore, the transformers do not constitute the release of petroleum
products or hazardous substances. As a result, the presence of transformers adjacent the
site is not considered to be a REC.
• Although septic tanks are used to treat waste, major manufacturing facilities are not present
and are not known to have been the present at the site. The septic tank at the Wilson house
is likely to treat minor household waste and not chemicals. As a result, the presence of a
septic tank at the site does not constitute the release of petroleum products or hazardous
substances and is not considered to be a REC.
• The potential presence of LBP in onsite building materials represents an environmental
concern for the site, but not necessarily a REC.
• The potential presence of ACM in onsite building materials represents an environmental
concern for the site, but not necessarily a REC.
Conclusions
Amec Foster Wheeler has performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and
limitations of ASTM Standard E 1527-13 for property addressed as 9117 NC Highway 33 NW,
Edgecombe County, North Carolina. Any exceptions to, or deviations from, this practice are
described in Section 12.0 of this report. This assessment did not reveal the presence of RECs
associated with the site with the exception of the following:
• The UST located at the Wilson house.
Amec Foster Wheeler does not guarantee the site is free of contamination or hazardous waste
material due to unknown or latent conditions that may become evident in the future, either on the
site or on adjoining or nearby properties. In addition, site conditions might change over time.
Should additional surface, subsurface, chemical or other data become available after the date of
issue of this report, the findings, conclusions and recommendations contained herein may have
to be modified. Review by Amec Foster Wheeler of such additional information would be
conducted upon receipt of a written request from our client.
Limitations
This Executive Summary is provided as a summary only, and should be used only in conjunction
with a full review of the complete Phase I ESA report. Amec Foster Wheeler completed this work
under the contract terms and conditions agreed upon by the Palustrine Group.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page vi

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina amec
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment {Oster
wheeler
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) was retained by
Palustrine Group to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for a 600-acre site
(herein referred to as the "site") located at 9117 NC Highway 33 NW, Tarboro, North Carolina in
general accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM International (ASTM) E 1527-13,
"Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Process." The site location relative to the surrounding area is depicted on the topographic map
provided as Figure 1.
The site, identified as NC Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 4812-22-1043, consists of one parcel
measuring 599.93 acres and is owned by Franklin Wilson Jr. The site is currently occupied by
agricultural land, undeveloped woodland, a cemetery, and various structures. The configuration of
the site and properties in the vicinity of the site are depicted on Figure 2. Site features are depicted
on Figures 3A and 3B.
This Phase I ESA was conducted in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM International
(ASTM) E 1527-13, "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment Process" and the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) All
Appropriate Inquiries Rules (AAI).
1.1 Purpose
This Phase I ESA is intended to satisfy one of the requirements to permit the users of this document
to qualify for the innocent landowner, adjoining property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser
limitations on liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) (landowner liability protections).
This Phase I ESA conforms to standards for "all appropriate inquiries"' into the previous ownership
and uses of the site, as specified by the US EPA in 40 CFR Part 312, and in accordance with good
commercial or customary practice.
The goal of the Phase I ESA process is to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs). The
term REC means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum
products in, on, or at a site: (1) due to any release to the environment, (2) under conditions indicative
of a release to the environment, or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release
to the environment. De minimis conditions are not RECs. A de minimis condition generally does not
present a threat to human health or the environment, and generally would not be the subject of an
enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.
Separate and distinct from a REC are two other types of conditions that may be noted in a Phase I
ESA: a controlled REC (CREC) or an historical REC (HREC).
A CREC is a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that
has been addressed to the current satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (i.e., as
As defined at 42 U.S.C. Section 9601(35)(B) and 40 CFR Part 312.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No. 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 1

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina arneC
Phase t Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
evidenced by a no further action [NFA] letter or the equivalent, or meeting risk -based criteria
established by the regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed
to remain in place, subject to the implementation of required controls such as site use restrictions,
activity and use limitations (AULs), institutional controls, or engineering controls.
An HREC is a REC from a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that
has occurred in connection with the site, and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable
regulatory authority (using current criteria), or meets the unrestricted residential use criteria
established by the regulatory authority and applicable at the time of this Phase I ESA, without
subjecting the site to any required controls.
1.2 Detailed Scope of Services
The scope of services for conducting a Phase I ESA is outlined in ASTM E 1527-13. This Phase I
ESA report should not be used for any purposes outside the scope. Significant additions, deletions,
or deviations to ASTM E 1527-13 are noted below or in corresponding sections of this report. To
complete the scope of services, the following tasks were performed:
• A physical site reconnaissance to identify likely RECs in connection with the site;
• Visual observation of adjoining properties or facilities to assess conditions that may indicate
RECs on the site or on an adjoining property;
• Review of historical land use of the site back to the first developed use or 1940, whichever is
earlier;
• Review of existing published information related to geology, hydrology, and topographical
information for the site;
• Review of reasonably ascertainable records and regulatory agency file database searches to
identify federal and state -listed properties of known potential environmental concern located
within the minimum search distances from the site, as specified in ASTM E 1527-13;
• Interviews with present and past site owners, operators/managers, or occupants;
• Interviews with representatives of the state, county or local regulatory agencies with knowledge
of the site;
• Evaluation of compiled information and documentation; and,
• Preparation of this report.
This Phase I ESA does not address non -scope considerations as defined in Section 13 of ASTM
E 1527-13. The scope of work does not include items considered to be beyond the scope of an
ASTM Standard Phase I ESA, such as the collection and testing of groundwater samples, surface
and drinking water samples, air samples (including radon), or building material samples for
hazardous materials (including polychlorinated biphenyls [PCBs], asbestos, and lead -based paint).
It also does not include the identification of wetlands, endangered or protected plant and animal
species, or historical or archeological sites, geotechnical studies, geologic hazards, potential noise
or air quality impacts, or concerns related to the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 62501701
Page 2

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina Phase l Environmental Site Assessment ameC amec
foster
wheeler
1.3 Significant Assumptions
Amec Foster Wheeler has prepared this Phase I ESA using reasonable efforts to identify RECs
associated with hazardous substances or petroleum products at the site. Findings in this Phase I
ESA are presented as professional judgments expressed herein, and are based on the facts currently
available to Amec Foster Wheeler within the limits of the existing data, scope of work, budget and
schedule. It is Amec Foster Wheeler's specific intent that the findings and conclusions herein provide
guidance and is not necessarily a firm course of action, except where explicitly stated.
An independent data research company, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) of Milford,
Connecticut, provided Amec Foster Wheeler with the government agency database search report
referenced in this Phase I ESA. The information provided to Amec Foster Wheeler from the
government agency database search was assumed to be correct, unless obviously contradicted by
Amec Foster Wheeler's observations or contradicted by another credible referenced source
reviewed by Amec Foster Wheeler.
Similarly, Amec Foster Wheeler has assumed that responses to questions during interviews have
been truthful, and that information contained in previous reports for the site or adjoining properties
(i.e., earlier Phase I ESAs or consultants' reports on tank removals or spill response) is accurate
(pursuant to Section 4.7 of ASTM E 1527-13), unless contradicted by Amec Foster Wheeler's
observations or contradicted by other credible referenced sources reviewed by Amec Foster
Wheeler.
1.4 Limitations, Exceptions, Special Terms, and Conditions
This report summarizes work performed to fulfill the process specified under ASTM Standard E 1527-
13. The ASTM standard is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for
the federal CERCLA liability exemptions. Reasonable efforts were made to identify evidence of
aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), underground storage tanks (USTs) and ancillary on -site
equipment during the visit to the site. Reasonable efforts were limited to observation of accessible
areas, review of referenced public records and interviews. Amec Foster Wheeler was allowed full
access to the site and there were no obstructions to limit a visual review of the site, except where
noted in this Phase I ESA.
The quality of information, conclusions and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of
effort involved in Amec Foster Wheeler services, and based on: (1) information available at the time
of preparation, (2) data supplied by outside sources, and (3) the assumptions, conditions and
qualifications set forth in this report. The Phase I ESA is subject to the terms and conditions of the
contract between Palustrine Group and Amec Foster Wheeler. Any other use of, or reliance on, this
report by any third party is at that party's sole risk.
Environmental impairment of a property may result from many activities, such as illegal or unreported
dumping, or the spilling of hazardous wastes or materials. The presence of contaminants at a
particular property may not always be apparent and the completion of a Phase I ESA in accordance
with ASTM E 1527-13 cannot provide a guarantee that hazardous wastes or materials do not exist.
The scope of services executed for this project does not include an audit for regulatory compliance,
ecological resources, endangered species, cultural and historic resources, indoor air quality,
industrial hygiene, health and safety, or high -voltage power lines. It also does not include a detailed
condition survey for asbestos, lead, radon, lead in drinking water, or other potential hazards for
wetlands, naturally occurring materials, or other items not outlined in Amec Foster Wheeler's scope
of services. The findings of this report are valid as of the report date and are subject to the Phase I
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 3

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina ameC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
ESA limitations described herein, and in ASTM Standard E 1527-13. An updated Phase I ESA will
be required for the site after a period of 180 days.
The findings contained herein are relevant to the dates of Amec Foster Wheeler's site
reconnaissance and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at later dates. In the event
that changes in the nature, usage, or layout of the property or nearby properties are made, the
conclusions and recommendations contained in this report may not be valid. If additional information
becomes available, it should be provided to Amec Foster Wheeler so the original conclusions and
recommendations can be modified as necessary.
Regardless of findings stated in this Phase I ESA, Amec Foster Wheeler is not responsible for
consequences of conditions arising from facts that were withheld or not fully disclosed to Amec
Foster Wheeler during this Phase I ESA.
This report does not address permit compliance or safety concerns, if any, associated with the site.
It is the responsibility of the user of this Phase I ESA to establish appropriate safety and health
practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Amec Foster Wheeler
has completed this work under the contract terms and conditions with Palustrine Group.
1.5 User Reliance
This Phase I ESA is intended to be used by Palustrine Group, and is subject to the terms and
conditions of the contract between Palustrine Group and Amec Foster Wheeler. This Phase I ESA
may not be relied upon by other parties without the express written consent of Palustrine Group and
upon written acceptance of our terms and conditions through Amec Foster Wheeler's Third Party
Reliance Agreement.
In accordance with ASTM E 1527-13, this report is valid for one year from the date of the intended
transaction assuming interviews, a search for environmental liens, a review of government records,
the visual reconnaissance of the site and surrounding properties, and the environmental professional
declarations are updated within 180 days prior to the intended transaction.
Provided that the report is still valid and reliable, as per the limitations and exceptions listed above,
Amec Foster Wheeler will issue a third -party reliance letter to parties that Palustrine Group identifies
in writing, upon payment of the then -current fee for such letters. All third parties relying on Amec
Foster Wheeler's report, by such reliance agree to be bound by our proposal and Amec Foster
Wheeler's reliance agreement. Amec Foster Wheeler's standard reliance letter indicates that in no
event shall Amec Foster Wheeler be liable for any damages, howsoever arising, relating to third -
party reliance on Amec Foster Wheeler's report.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 4

1.
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment amec
foster
wheeler
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The following is a description of the location, general setting and usage of the site and adjoining
properties, based on information provided by the property owner, documents reviewed during the
preparation of this Phase I ESA and observations made during the site reconnaissance.
2.1 Location and Legal Description
The site is located at 9117 NC Highway 33 NW in Edgecombe County, approximately 1.5 miles
northwest of Leggett, North Carolina. Property information for the site was obtained from the
Edgecombe County Tax Assessors Property Information Public Access Site available at
http://www.edgecombecountVnc.gov/assessor/assessor.aspx. The site, identified as North Carolina
Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 4812-22-1043, consists of one parcel measuring 599.93 acres
and is owned by Franklin Wilson Jr. The Edgecombe County parcel information for the site is
presented as Appendix A.
2.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics
The site consists of a total of 599.93 acres and is located south of NC Highway 33 in Edgecombe
County, NC. The site is located in an area generally consisting of agricultural, residential, and
undeveloped land use. Table 2 in Section 2.4 provides a summary of adjoining property use.
2.3 Current Site Usage
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was occupied by agricultural land, undeveloped
woodland, a cemetery, and various structures. Onsite structures/improvements included an
occupied single -story house (Wilson house) with a well house, barn and shed, an unoccupied single -
story house, a concrete cellar, a livestock pen and well house, and deer stands.
According to Tax Assessor documents (www.edgecombecountync.-gov/assessor/assessor.aspx),
the Wilson house was constructed in 1961 and is estimated to be 1,940 square feet (sq ft) in area.
The building consists of brick walls and shingle roof.
Table 1 summarizes current utilities on the site.
Table 1 - Site Utilities
Service
Electricity
Provider
Carolina Power
Natural Gas
NA
Potable Water
Edgecombe County
Sanitary Sewer
NA
Trash Collection
Unknown
2.4 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties
Table 2 summarizes the adjoining properties and their uses as identified by Amec Foster Wheeler
on the day of the site reconnaissance. These properties are also depicted on Figure 2.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 5

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase t Environmental Site Assessment amec
foster
wheeler
Table 2 -Adjoining Properties
PropertyDirection
North
Undeveloped woodland and agricultural land, with a homestead further north
East
Undeveloped woodland and agricultural land
South
Swift Creek and undeveloped woodland
West
White Oak Swamp, undeveloped woodland and agricultural land, and single-
family residences further west
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01,01
Page 6

l; Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina amec
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment f 05ter
wheeler
3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING
Amec Foster Wheeler reviewed reasonably ascertainable sources including the EDR Radius MapTM
Report with GeoCheck® dated January 18, 2017, to assess the physical setting of the site (i.e.
topographic, geologic, hydrogeologic and hydrologic characteristics). EDR's report is included as
Appendix B. The results of Amec Foster Wheeler's review are presented below.
3.1 Topography
According to the EDR Radius MapTm Report with GeoCheck® (Appendix B), the site is located at
approximately 59 feet (ft) above mean sea level (msl). The topography of the area is generally flat
with a slight slope to the south.
3.2 Soils
The EDR Radius MapTm Report with GeoCheck® (Appendix B) indicates the site is underlain by
Tarboro loamy sand, Roanoke loam, Altavista fine loamy sand, Dogue fine sandy loam, Ballahack
fine sandy loam, and Conetoe loamy sand. Soil drainage varies from well/excessively drained
(Tarboro, Conetoe) to moderately well drained (Altavista, Dogue) to poorly/very poorly drained
(Roanoke, Ballahack). Minimum depth to the water table ranges from greater than 0 inches to greater
than 69 inches.
3.3 Groundwater
Regional and local groundwater migration is strongly influenced by surface drainage, topography,
and the permeability of subsurface materials. Depth to groundwater and groundwater flow direction
are expected to be seasonally variable in the vicinity of the site. Based on topography and drainage
patterns, it appears that surface water and first encountered groundwater would generally flow to the
south-southwest towards White Oak Swamp or south-southeast towards Swift Creek (Figures 1 and
2).
Localized groundwater flow patterns and depths which differ from these conditions may exist due to
the presence of underground utilities, heterogeneous subsurface conditions, local recharge factors,
and/or local groundwater pumping. Therefore, without site -specific or localized hydrogeologic
information, any material release of a hazardous substance or petroleum product into the natural
environment on an adjacent property or in the vicinity could be considered a potential environmental
risk to the site through contaminant migration via advection and dispersion within the localized
groundwater flow system.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 7

I.
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment amec
foster
wheeler
4.0 USER -PROVIDED INFORMATION
For purposes of this assessment, Palustrine Group is identified as the user of this Phase I ESA
report. In accordance with Section 6 of ASTM E 1527-13, the user of this Phase I ESA was informed
that they were responsible for providing the following information to Amec Foster Wheeler's
environmental professional for consideration during the assessment:
• Reasonably ascertainable title or judicial records related to environmental liens and AULs for
the site;
• Actual knowledge of the user of any environmental liens or AULs;
• Specialized knowledge or experience of the user with regard to the site and activities thereon
that may be material to any potential RECs;
• Commonly known (within the local community) or reasonably ascertainable information
regarding past releases, conditions indicative of releases, or threatened releases of hazardous
substances or petroleum;
• Information as to whether the purchase price of the site is lower than the fair market value due
to contamination; and,
• The reason why the user wants to have the Phase I ESA performed.
A user provided questionnaire was completed by Mr. Tommy Cousins, Vice President of Palustrine
Group, on January 23, 2017. The information obtained from the questionnaire is summarized in
Table 3. A copy of the User Questionnaire is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3 - Information Obtained from User Questionnaire
Was Information
Amec
Foster Wheeler
User -Provided Information'
ProvidedWas
Foster Wheeler?
.
Procurethe
Information?
Title Records 4.1
(Yes/No)
No
No
Environmental Liens and Activity and
No
No
Use Limitations 4.2
Specialized Knowledge 4.3
No
No
Commonly Known or Reasonable
No
Ascertainable Information 4.4
Yes
Valuation Reduction for Environmental
Yes
No
Issues 4.5
Reason for Performing Phase I ESA
No
No
4.6
Other 4.7
No
No
Numbers in parentheses reflect the report section in which the information is discussed.
The following sections summarize the results of the User Provided Questionnaire.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 8

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment amec
foster
wheeler
4.1 Title Records
Although the user did not provide title records for the site, Amec Foster Wheeler acquired current
title records using the Edgecombe County Tax Assessors Property Information Public Access Site
(http://www.ed-gecombecountync.gov/assessor/assessor.aspx). The records reviewed included
deeds detailing revisions to ownership. These records are included in Appendix A.
The chain of title documentation is summarized as follows:
Table 4 — Chain of Title Documentation Summary
4.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations
The user is not aware of any Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) such as engineering controls, land -
use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the site, and/or have been filed or recorded
in a registry under federal, tribal, state or local law.
4.3 Specialized Knowledge
The user does not have specialized knowledge or experience related to the chemicals and processes
used at the site or nearby properties.
4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information
The user indicated that the past use of the property was for agricultural and hunting purposes, and
was otherwise not aware of other commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about
the site that would help the environmental professional identify conditions indicative of releases or
threatened releases.
4.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues
The user indicated that the purchase price being paid for the property reasonable reflects the fair
market value of the property.
4.6 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA
This Phase I ESA is intended to satisfy one of the requirements to permit users to qualify for the
innocent landowner, adjoining property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on
liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA) (landowner liability protections).
4.7 Other
The user did not have other knowledge or experience, such as copies of prior environmental site
assessment reports, documents, or correspondence concerning the site and its environmental
conditions that may be deemed pertinent to the assessment by the environmental professional.
Amec Foster wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 9

i*-
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina amec
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW
This section presents the results from an environmental records review. Section 5.1 discusses
results from the search of standard environmental databases. These records were reviewed to
assess potential environmental concerns for the site, and when applicable, surrounding properties.
Section 5.2 discusses results from additional environmental records sources that were reviewed as
part of this Phase I ESA.
5.1 Standard Environmental Records Sources
Amec Foster Wheeler reviewed the results of a search of standard environmental records sources
as required by ASTM Standard E 1527-13 in the vicinity of the site. The results of the regulatory
agency database search are presented in an EDR Radius MapTm Report with GeoCheck® dated
January 18, 2017. The database review was focused on information pertaining to storage and/or
reported releases of hazardous substances and petroleum products on the site and/or on
surrounding properties that may affect the site. The EDR Radius MapT11 Report with GeoCheck® is
included in Appendix B.
The database search information has been divided into four subcategories: state, local, tribal and
federal records, and EDR proprietary records. All properties listed in the report that did not have
sufficient information for mapping their location were called orphan sites and were listed separately.
Orphan sites are properties in government record reports prepared by commercial database vendors
that cannot be geographically located (i.e., mapped or geocoded) due to an inadequate or incomplete
address in the government database or computer map files.
Review of the federal, state, tribal, and proprietary environmental records summary provided by EDR
did not identify the site address (9117 NC Highway 33 NW) on any environmental record listings for
sites of environmental concern. Additionally, review of the federal, state, tribal, and proprietary
records summary provided by EDR did not reveal any listings for sites of environmental concern
located within the respective ASTM standard search distances.
5.1.1 Orphan Sites List
Two facilities estimated by EDR to be located within 1 mile of the site were identified on standard
environmental record sources databases, but could not be properly mapped by EDR due to poor or
inadequate address information. These facilities were identified as orphan sites in the EDR Radius
Map database listings. Based on distances from the site, the types of listings, and the assumed
direction of groundwater flow, the orphan sites listed are not likely to have a negative impact on the
site.
5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources
On January 31, 2017, Ms. Sarah Levine of Amec Foster Wheeler contacted the Edgecombe County
Office of Emergency Services to request records for the site. Mr. Walters, the Emergency Services
Interim Director, responded that no records exist for the site addressed 9117 NC Highway 33 NW.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 10

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina amec
!IF
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
6.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW
Additional historical source records for the site were identified and reviewed and including local city
directories, historical aerial photographs, historical topographic and street maps, and Sanborn@ Fire
Insurance (Sanborn@) Maps.
Amec Foster Wheeler reviewed reasonably ascertainable, standard historical sources to develop a
history of the previous uses of the site and surrounding area to help identify the likelihood of past
uses that could have led to RECs in connection with the site. Amec Foster Wheeler has attempted
to identify the past uses of the site at intervals defined by ASTM from the present back to the site's
first developed use or 1940, whichever is earlier.
6.1 Local City Directory
EDR completed a local street directory search for 9117 NC Highway 33 NW in Tarboro, North
Carolina as a screening tool to assist in evaluating potential liability resulting from past activities on
or near the site. Street directory listings for the years 2003, 2008, and 2013 were provided for the
site area. The local street directory report is summarized in Table 5 and included in Appendix D.
Table 5 — Street Directory Search Results
6.2 Aerial Photographs
Aerial photographs are photographs taken from an aerial platform with sufficient resolution to allow
identification of development and activities of areas encompassing the site. Amec Foster Wheeler
reviewed available aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area dated 1954, 1974, 1976,
1980, 1982, 1994, 1998, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012. Table 6 summarizes the
information obtained from review of the aerial photographs. It should be noted that site features may
not be discernable on the aerial photographs due to the scale or degree of clarity of a given
photograph. Copies of the aerial photographs obtained from EDR are included in Appendix D.
Table 6: Aerial Photograph Search Results
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 11

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
armec
foster
wheeler
PropertyDate Scale
, .Properties
The larger scale of this projection makes it difficult
he surrounding properties appear to be
to assess specific site features; however, the
mostly agricultural and undeveloped
1974
1" = 1,000' study area appears much the same as it did in
properties. Swift Creek is visible south of
1954.
he site and NC Highway 33 NW is visible
o the north.
The larger scale and poor quality of this projection
he larger scale and poor quality of this
makes it difficult to assess specific site features;
Projection makes it difficult to assess
1976
1" = 1,000'
however, the study area appears much the same
specific site features; however, the
as it did in previous aerial photographs.
surrounding area appears much the same
s it did in previous aerial photographs.
The larger scale and poor quality of this projection
he larger scale and poor quality of this
makes it difficult to assess specific site features;
projection makes it difficult to assess
1980
1" = 1,000'
however, the study area appears much the same
specific site features; however, the
as it did in previous aerial photographs.
surrounding area appears much the same
s it did in previous aerial photographs,
The site appears much the same as it did in 1954.
More structures are visible in the northern portion
of the site, just south of the cemetery. The
he surrounding area appears much the
1982
1" = 500'
structures previously located in the south-central
ame as it did in previous aerial
portion of the site appear to be gone and a new
photographs.
structure is located further north along the main
north -south road.
The site appears to contain more undeveloped
The surrounding area appears much the
1994
1" = 500'
woods than in previous photographs. The
same as it did in previous aerial
structures appear unchanged.
photographs.
The poor quality of this projection makes it difficult
to assess specific site features; however, the
The surrounding area appears much the
1998
1" = 750'
study area appears much the same as it did in
same as it did in previous aerial
1994. Surface water bodies are visible at the
photographs.
southeastern boundary of the site.
The study area appears much the same as it did
he surrounding area appears much the
2005
1" = 500
in 1998.
ame as it did in previous aerial
photographs.
The southern half of the site appears to contain
he surrounding area appears much the
2006
1" = 500'
more undeveloped woods than in previous
ame as it did in previous aerial
photographs. The structure in the south-central
photographs.
portion of the site is not visible.
The study area appears much the same as it did
he surrounding area appears much the
2008
1" = 500'
in 2006.
ame as it did in previous aerial
photographs.
The study area appears much the same as it did
he surrounding area appears much the
2009
1" = 500'
in 2008.
ame as it did in previous aerial
photographs.
Surface water bodies are visible in the southern
he surrounding area appears much the
2010
1" = 500'
portion of the site in the vicinity of Swift Creek.
ame as it did in previous aerial
photographs.
The study area appears much the same as it did
he surrounding area appears much the
2012
1" = 500'
in 2010.
ame as it did in previous aerial
photographs.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 12

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina p
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment amec
foster
wheeler
6.3 Historical Topographic and Street Maps
Historical topographic maps of the site and surrounding area were reviewed from the years 1902,
1903, 1960, 1981, and 2013. Table 7 summarizes the information obtained from review of the
topographic maps. Copies of the topographic maps are included in Appendix D.
Table 7: Historical Topographic Map Search Results
Date
Scale
Property
Adjoining Properties
The adjoining properties to the east and west
appear to be undeveloped. Structures are
The northern half of the site is not
shown on the adjoining properties to the south.
1902
1" = 24,000"
visible. The site appears
The adjoining properties to the north are not
undeveloped.
visible. Swift Creek is shown at the southern
border of the site. NC Highway 33 NW is also
hown in the same location as present day.
1903
1" = 24,000"
No changes
No changes
The southern half of the site is not
he region surrounding the site is portrayed as
visible. Bulluck Cemetery and one
series of roadways, Swift Creek, and White
additional structure is shown on
Oak Swamp existing in the approximate
1960
1" = 24,000"
the northern portion of the site.
locations of present day. Structures are shown
Several small roads and tributaries
n adjacent properties to the northeast and
to Swift Creek are shown within the
northwest.
study area.
The northern half of the site is not
The topography surrounding the site is more
1981
1" - 24,000"
visible. Several small roads, Swift
Jetailed but generally unchanged. Fewer
Creek and its tributaries are shown
structures are shown on adjacent properties to
within the study area.
he south than in 1903.
The topography, roads, and
The topography, roads, and waterways are
2013
1" = 24,000"
waterways are unchanged. No
unchanged. No structures are shown on the
structures are shown on the map.
hap.
6.4 Fire Insurance Maps
On January 18, 2017, Amec Foster Wheeler requested EDR to search for available Sanborn® Fire
Insurance Maps. A reply was received on January 18, 2017, stating that Sanborn® Fire Insurance
Maps for the target property were not found. A copy of the EDR response is included in Appendix
D.
6.5 Previous Reports or Records of Proceedings
Amec Foster Wheeler did not obtain previous reports for the site addressed as 9117 NC Highway
33 NW.
6.6 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties
Amec Foster Wheeler did not obtain previous reports for the properties adjoining 9117 NC Highway
33 NW.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 13

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina arnec
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
Ms. Sarah Levine and Ms. Karina Casey of Amec Foster Wheeler completed the site reconnaissance
on January 24, 2017, observing the general conditions and operations on the site. This section
presents the findings of the site reconnaissance. These observations pertain to the general
conditions of the physical land, including location and presence of ponded water, wetlands, stained
and stressed vegetation, monitoring wells, wastewater, and solid or liquid waste. Relevant site
features are depicted on Figures 3A and 3B. Photographs were taken of notable site features and
are included in Appendix E.
7.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions
The exterior of the site was visually and/or physically observed from the periphery, including adjacent
public thoroughfares, and then systematically traversed to view exterior features of the site and
existing structures. Accessible common areas used by occupants or the public were visually and/or
physically observed. Interior areas of private residences were not observed. Areas below floors,
above ceilings and behind walls were not observed. Observations of exterior portions of the site were
limited to areas that could be reached using public thoroughfares and/or on foot.
7.2 General Site Setting
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was occupied by agricultural land, undeveloped
woodland, a cemetery, and various structures. The site was located on the southern side of NC
Highway 33 NW, approximately 1.5 miles northwest of Leggett, North Carolina in Edgecombe
County. The site consisted of one 599.93-acre parcel.
Amec Foster Wheeler did not observe avenues for dumping of hazardous materials or petroleum
products such as roads or pathways with no apparent outlet on the site. Hunting access roads were
observed on the property; however, access to these roads is limited. Therefore, it is unlikely they
provide avenues for dumping of hazardous materials or petroleum products.
7.3 Buildings and Structures
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was occupied by the Wilson house, a well house,
barn, shed, an unoccupied single -story house, a livestock pen and well house, a concrete cellar, and
deer stands. The Wilson house was a 1,940 sq ft, single -story brick house with a shingle roof, in
good condition, located in the north -central portion of the site. A 20 sq ft cinderblock well house in
fair condition and a 2,000 sq ft barn in poor condition were observed south-southwest of the Wilson
house. Conduits of unknown origin were observed in ground surfaces in the vicinity of the well house.
A metal shed in poor condition measuring approximately 40 sq ft was observed south of the Wilson
house. A structure presumed to be a concrete cellar was observed in the northwestern corner of the
site. The cellar was approximately 6 ft deep, measuring 6x3 ft, and lined with concrete. An
approximately 3,000 sq ft unoccupied wooden house was observed near the eastern site boundary
just south of the agricultural fields. The house was constructed of wood and in very poor condition.
A wooden livestock pen measuring approximately 12,000 sq ft in very poor condition was observed
in the central wooded portion of the site. A cinderblock well house in poor condition was observed
southwest of the livestock pen. Several wooden deer stands in good or fair condition were observed
in southern portion of the site.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 14

t; Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina amec
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
7.4 Aboveground Storage Tanks
Two ASTs were observed on the site at the time of the site reconnaissance. One 1,000-gallon AST
of liquefied petroleum gas was observed east of the Wilson house, and, one unlabeled 1,000-gallon
AST (that appeared to be an abandoned liquefied petroleum gas tank) was observed near the old
livestock pen. No staining or stressed vegetation was observed below the ASTs.
Four open -top, concrete cisterns estimated to be four feet in diameter were observed at the site, one
at the Wilson house and three near the livestock pen. The locations in which the cisterns are present
suggest they were likely used to store water or feed for livestock on the property.
7.5 Underground Storage Tanks
Piping and a concrete pad associated with a UST were observed south of the Wilson house at the
time of the site reconnaissance. The size, age, and contents of the UST are unknown.
7.6 Odors
No unusual odors were observed on the site at the time of the site reconnaissance.
7.7 Pools of Liquid
Pools, catchment structures, or sumps containing liquids or oily sheen likely to be hazardous
substances or petroleum products were not observed on the interior or exterior portions of the site
during the site reconnaissance.
7.8 Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons
No pits, ponds, or lagoons were observed on the site at the time of the site reconnaissance.
7.9 Drums
Empty drums and drums containing household trash were observed on the site at the time of the site
reconnaissance. No ground staining was observed around the drums, and they are considered solid
waste.
7.10 Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Product Storage Containers
Two partially full gas cans and two buckets containing used oil were observed near the Wilson house
and barn at the time of site reconnaissance.
7.11 Unidentified Substance Containers
Outside of the non -labeled AST and UST previously discussed in Sections 7.4 and 7.5, no
unidentified substance containers were observed onsite.
7.12 Polychlorinated Biphenyis (PCBs)
No electrical or hydraulic equipment known to contain PCBs or likely to contain PCBs was visually
observed on the interior or exterior portions of the site. Three pole -mounted transformers were
observed on the northern adjacent property. Non -PCB labels were observed on the transformers.
No staining or corrosion was observed on the transformers, and the ground and vegetated surfaces
at the base of the pole in the vicinity of the transformer did not appear to be stained or stressed
during site reconnaissance.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 15

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina dmeC
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
7.13 Water Intrusion
No signs of water intrusion were observed during the site reconnaissance.
7.14 Stains or Corrosion
No staining or corrosion was observed onsite during the site reconnaissance.
7.15 Drains, Sumps, or Other Discharge Features
A drainage ditch was observed on the northeastern portion of the site, along NC Highway 33 NW.
Several irrigation ditches were observed in the northern agricultural portion of the site.
7.16 Stained Soil/Pavement or Stressed Vegetation
Stained soil/pavement or stressed vegetation was not observed on the site during the site
reconnaissance.
7.17 Solid Waste or Fill Dirt
Solid waste and debris including but not limited to household trash, empty drums, construction
debris, tires, farm equipment, empty oil and pesticide containers were observed on the site during
the site reconnaissance. Large areas of solid waste (more than 100 sq ft) were observed in the
northwestern wooded portion of the site and near the Wilson house.
7.18 Wastewater
No wastewater or other liquids, including stormwater that discharges into a drain, ditch, underground
injection system, or stream on or near the site, were observed during the site reconnaissance.
7.19 Wells
Two water supply wells were observed on the site during the site reconnaissance. One well was
observed at the Wilson house and one well was observed near the livestock pen.
7.20 Septic Systems
No septic systems were observed on the site during the site reconnaissance; however, as discussed
in Section 8.0, an interview with the property owner's agent confirmed the presence of a 1,200-gallon
septic tank at the Wilson house.
7.21 Wet Areas or Surface Water Bodies
A detailed wetland evaluation is beyond the scope of this investigation. Wet areas that may be
wetlands and large surface water bodies were observed in the southern wooded portion of the site
and the northwestern portion of the site. A stream was observed along the southern boundary of the
site. No obvious signs of filling of wetlands or discharges (i.e., oily sheen) to nearby surface water
bodies were observed.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 16

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ameC
foster
wheeler
8.0 INTERVIEWS
During the course of this Phase I ESA, Amec Foster Wheeler interviewed knowledgeable people to
obtain information about the site, particularly regarding possible RECs in connection with the site.
Information obtained from the interviews is presumed to have been provided in good faith and to the
full extent of the knowledge of the individual responding.
Table 8 - Summary of Interviews
On January 27, 2017, Ms. Sarah Levine of Amec Foster Wheeler interviewed Mr. Vinson Bridgers,
agent for the property owner. Mr. Bridgers provided the following information.
• The property has been owned by the Wilson family for approximately 65 years.
• The property has been used as farmland and pastoral land by current and previous owners.
• Mr. Bridgers believes lead paint is present in structures on the property.
• Mr. Bridgers is not aware of any USTs on the property.
• The property is serviced by Edgecombe County water and Carolina Power. Trash collection is
probably conducted by a private contractor.
• The house contains an estimated 1,200-gallon septic system.
• No spills, chemical releases, or environmental cleanups are known to have occurred at the
property or adjacent properties.
On January 31, 2017, Ms. Sarah Levine of Amec Foster Wheeler contacted the Edgecombe County
Office of Emergency Services to request records for the site. Mr. Walters, the Emergency Services
Interim Director, responded that no records exist for the site addressed 9117 NC Highway 33 NW.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 17

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina ameC
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
9.0 FINDINGS
Amec Foster Wheeler performed this Phase I ESA in general conformance with the scope and
limitations of ASTM Standard E 1527-13 for the site located at 9117 NC Highway 33 NW,
Edgecombe County, North Carolina. The site consists of one parcel (NC PIN 4812-22-1043)
measuring 599.93 acres in size. The site is currently owned by Franklin Wilson Jr. and occupied by
agricultural land, undeveloped woodland, a cemetery, and various structures.
Review of the federal, state and tribal (if appropriate) records, including a proprietary records
summary provided by EDR, indicated that no properties of environmental concern are located within
the respective ASTM standard search distances for each category.
Historical documents reviewed for this assessment indicate that the site was developed as early as
1954 with a cemetery and residential buildings. The site has been primarily developed as agricultural
land or remained undeveloped since as early as 1954.
A site reconnaissance was performed on January 24, 2017. Interior areas of private residences were
not observed. Observations of exterior portions of the site were limited to areas that could be reached
using public thoroughfares and/or on foot.
The following environmental concerns were identified during the completion of this Phase I ESA:
Two 1,000-gallon ASTs were observed at the site. One AST was located at the Wilson house
was labeled as containing liquefied petroleum gas. The second AST was located at the
livestock pen and appeared to be an abandoned liquefied petroleum gas tank. No staining or
stressed vegetation was observed around the ASTs.
• Piping and a concrete pad associated with a UST were observed south of the Wilson house.
The size, age, and contents of the UST are unknown.
• Two water supply wells were observed at the site, near the Wilson house and near the livestock
pen.
• Four open -top, four -foot diameter, concrete cisterns were observed at the site, one at the
Wilson house and three near the livestock pen.
• Two partially full gas cans and two buckets containing used oil were observed near the Wilson
house and barn.
• Solid waste and debris including but not limited to household trash, empty drums, construction
debris, tires, farm equipment, empty oil and pesticide containers, and scrap metal were
observed on the site. Large areas of solid waste (more than 100 sq ft) were observed in the
northwestern wooded portion of the site and near the Wilson house.
• Three pole -mounted transformers were observed on the northern adjacent property. Non -PCB
labels were observed on the transformers. No staining or corrosion was observed on the
transformers, and the ground and vegetated surfaces at the base of the pole in the vicinity of
the transformer did not appear to be stained or stressed.
• An interview with the property owner's agent identified the presence of an approximately 1,200-
gallon septic tank at the Wilson House.
• An interview with the property owner's agent indicated the potential presence of lead based
paint (LBP) at the Wilson House.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 18

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina amec
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
Based on the construction date of the Wilson house (1961), it is possible that asbestos
containing materials (ACMs) are present in building materials onsite.
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Amec Foster Wheeler
3, 2017
Page 19

l; Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina ameC
Phase t Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
10.0 OPINION
Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA, Amec Foster Wheeler offers the following opinions for
the site:
• Staining was not observed on ground surfaces in the vicinity of the two ASTs and the ASTs
appeared to be of sound condition. As a result, the ASTs do not constitute a release of
petroleum products or hazardous substances and are not considered to be a REC.
• The presence of a UST at the Wilson house of unknown age, size, and contents constitutes
conditions indicative of a release of petroleum products or hazardous substances. Therefore,
the UST is considered to be a REC.
• Two water supply wells were observed at the site. Wells provide a direct connection from the
ground surface to subsurface aquifer that, in the event of a spill, could be an environmental
concern. However, at present, spills are not known to have occurred in the vicinity of the wells
and therefore the presence of the wells at the site does not constitute the release of petroleum
products or hazardous substances. As a result, the presence of wells in the Study Area is not
considered to be a REC.
• The cisterns observed onsite were likely used to containerize water and/or feed for livestock.
The presence of the cisterns on the property is not considered to be a REC.
• Two partially full gas cans and two buckets containing used oil were observed near the Wilson
house and barn at the time of site reconnaissance. The containers were not stored in secondary
containment but the amount of petroleum product would not produce a significant impact to the
environment if released. Therefore, they are considered a de minimis condition and not a REC.
• Solid waste and debris was observed on the site. Ground surfaces in the vicinity of solid waste
and debris did not appear to be stained and the materials did not appear to be the source of a
release. The waste and debris are identified as a housekeeping issue that may require
coordination for proper disposal with a general subcontractor. Based on field observations
during the assessment, at present, the waste and debris do not constitute a release of
petroleum products or hazardous substances at the site and therefore are not a REC.
However, if significant staining is observed during removal, the waste and debris may be
considered a REC in the future.
• Three pole -mounted transformers were observed on the northern adjacent property. Non -PCB
labels were observed on the transformers, and the transforms were free of staining and
corrosion. Therefore, the transformers do not constitute the release of petroleum products or
hazardous substances. As a result, the presence of transformers adjacent the site is not
considered to be a REC.
• Although septic tanks are used to treat waste, major manufacturing facilities are not present
and are not known to have been the present at the site. The septic tank at the Wilson house is
likely to treat minor household and commercial waste and not chemicals. As a result, the
presence of a septic tank at the site does not constitute the release of petroleum products or
hazardous substances and is not considered to be a REC.
The potential presence of LBP in onsite building materials represents an environmental
concern for the site, but not necessarily a REC.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01,01
Page 20

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina am!�*
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment foster
r
wheeler
• The potential presence of ACM in onsite building materials represents an environmental
concern for the site, but not necessarily a REC.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01,01 February 3, 2017
Page 21

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina amec-
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
11.0 CONCLUSIONS
Amec Foster Wheeler has performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations
of ASTM Standard E 1527-13 for property addressed as 9117 NC Highway 33 NW, Edgecombe
County, North Carolina. Any exceptions to, or deviations from, this practice are described in
Section 12.0 of this report. This assessment did not reveal the presence of RECs associated with
the site with the exception of the following:
• The UST located at the Wilson house.
Amec Foster Wheeler does not guarantee the site is free of contamination or hazardous waste
material due to unknown or latent conditions that may become evident in the future, either on the
site or on adjoining or nearby properties. In addition, site conditions might change over time. Should
additional surface, subsurface, chemical or other data become available after the date of issue of
this report, the findings, conclusions and recommendations contained herein may have to be
modified. Review by Amec Foster Wheeler of such additional information would be conducted upon
receipt of a written request from our client.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 22

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina amec
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
12.0 DEVIATIONS AND DATA GAPS
Amec Foster Wheeler did not deviate from the ASTM E 1527-13 standard in conducting this
assessment.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01 February 3, 2017
Page 23

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina ameC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment foster
wheeler
13.0 REFERENCES
ASTM International (ASTM), 2013, ASTM E 1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
Certified Sanborn® Map Report by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. January 18, 2017 Inquiry
Number 4830486.3.
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. January 18, 2017
Inquiry Number 4830486.9.
The EDR-City Directory Image Report by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. January 19, 2017
Inquiry Number 4830486.5.
EDR Historical Topographic Map Report by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. January 18, 2017
Inquiry Number 4830486.4.
The EDR Radius Map"' Report with GeoCheck® by Environmental Data Resources, Inc., January
18, 2017 Inquiry Number 4830486.2s.
Edgecombe County Tax Information and Deed Records obtained from
http://www.edgecombecountync.gov/assessor/assessor.aspx.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 24

I,
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
ec
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment foster
fr
wheeler
14.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S)
I/we declare that, to the best of my/our professional knowledge and belief, I/we meet the definition
of environmental professional as defined in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
Part 312.0. I/we have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to
assess a site of the nature, history and setting of the subject site. I/we have developed and performed
all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR 312.
Vicki Garlington
Senior Project Manager
Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Amec Foster Wheeler
3, 2017
Page 25

Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ameC
foster
wheeler
15.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S)
Resumes for the individuals acting as representatives of Amec Foster Wheeler and involved in
preparing this report are included in Appendix F.
Amec Foster Wheeler
February 3, 2017 Project No.: 6250170127.01.01
Page 26

-- fkv
amec
foster
wheeler
FIGURES

- ' 1 IBM
, S•
1I
`3oil
r
t } , T 1f�
"J
�V t
:n 'r`� Ike_.. `•i
+t, Legend '^
y • AST
Cemetery
o Solid Waste
` 1 • Structure
- �� • Transformers
Pi, • UST
• Well/Cistern
r Areas of Solid Waste
9 4 v
u Mitigation Parcel
D 75 150 11 " 1 r �;S' ❑ Parcels
Feet j"- j
10
SITE:
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
.
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel
wm
Edge be County, North Carolina 27886
..�
CLIENT: Pale Group
POO BoxBox 71795
a m e c
North Charleston, South Carolina 29415
f
Amec Foster Wheeler
o5}��
l
Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
whee der
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, NC 27703
TITLF.
SITE FEATURES MAP
Wilson House Detail
Figure
M
SCALE: 1'=75' I DATE: 113N17 I PROJECT: 6450170127
O RAYYPF BY: SLevine CHECKED BY: V-Gadington
LOCATION: xpHM{5�b`°I.aalr��spalatb�w�ge ts�axcsx�cs,�trai ca<ox.a i�wmoa.i r,c�+N
23's CC% .Y W E.P— Ce Y Mnlpa S P— r 6

rldj �,s iV Y. k�x
AOCAC K, F,2M _WHITE. OAK SWA".1P_. �. 'ik. o •_ _ -, f
M�r 7k •;. I1�
2�7A13 13 14 15
10-••ir,. 2
6, t
Ca3 1
t "\
a9
0 7'
16
c 2 •" •�5'r
•�} J..Y� _ r t • ' � - 1 r ` �r as
r r
t 7�
o:-
•'4 • f
Legend
C AST
o Cemetery
j
h
o Solid Waste
Structure
• Transformers
fiw'
n
• UST
• Well/Cistern
Figure 38 Extents
Areas of Solid Waste
Mitigation Parcel Boundary
-._ • 1
— Roads
0 ,o0 1,000
•,
- •�
0 Parcels
'
.
PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel
EdgecomDe County, North Carolina 27886
CLIENT: Palustrine Group
PO Box 71795
a m ec
North Charleston, South Carolina 29415
foster
An
Amec Foster Wheeler
& Infrastructure, Inc.
wheeler
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, NC 27703
f919)381-9900
TITLE:
S1TE FEATURES MAP
Figure
SCALE: 1'=750' DATE: 1130117 I PROJECT: 6250170127
DRAWN BY: S. Levine CHECKED BY: V. Gartinglon
LOCATION:1 1sy'�wq.daara�wutawmlemAeM's�C.�s+i� aw, r,m.vwa.i—AY
a118 CCX4W,Ay M*dp- C-Iff, Mko~ sb Pluee M%

�.Yzya
"iik11L�i• '�
( 'ir
.._ U
11
O
31
all,
q
00 �`�Y�� ' •.i r .�.
Legend
0 500 1,000
Fee, :, o i ..;:;,...nrr.� ,„�;�� . isi
Roads
Mitigation Parcel Boundary
❑ Parcels
EPA, NC�'OnehAap,.NC
SITE: TITLE:
' PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Figure
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel
Edgecombe County, North Carolina 27886 SITE VICINITY MAP
CLIENT: Palustrine Group
PO Box 71795
a m e c North Charleston, South Carolina 29415
Amec Foster Wheeler SCALE: 1'= 1,000' DATE: 1/30/17 PROJECT: 6250170127 2
foster Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. DRAWN BY: S. Levine CHECKED BY: V. Garlington
Wheeler 4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, NC 27703 11DHM-FSlVrojectslTransportation\ProjectslRai11CSX�Central Carolina
[phone] LOCATION: Inlerrnodal Facility12016 CCMRoday MtEdgeoombe County Mitigation

amec
foster
wheeler
TITLE:
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Swift Creek Mitigation Parcel
Edgecombe County, North Carolina 27886
CLIENT: Palustrine Group
PO Box 71795
North Charleston, South Carolina 29415
Amec Foster Wheeler
Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, NC 27703
[phone]
SITE LOCATION MAP
iSCALE:1 ' = 2.000'1 DATE: 1130/17 1 PROJECT: 6250170127 1
DRAWN BY: S. Levine I CHECKED BY: V. Garlington
Figure
1
LOCATION: Interrnodal Faclity12016 C=Rocky MhEdgecombe County Mitigation

1/18/2017 Public Access I Edgecombe County
Home
PARCEL DETAIL
Parcel: 4812-22-1043-00 Address: 9117 NC 33 WEST Owner: WILSON, FRANKLIN IR
Property Address
9117 NC 33 WEST
Property Description
TR A PC 11 S 2
BULLOCKLD
Township Code
05
Zone Code
Neighborhood Code
Subdivision Code
Number of Buildings
Percentage Complete
Acreage
Square Footage
Topography Code
Utilities Code
Date Last Appraised
Current Owner
WILSON, FRANKLIN JR
P O BOX 1359
Owner Address
WILKESBORO, NC 28697
Deed Book/Page
1573/0159
Date Recorded
10/12/2011
Sales Price
$0.00
Valid Sale
E
5
Land Tax Value $768,518.00
599.93 Building Tax Value $65,486.00
26132950 Land Deferment $441,947.00
Value
Exemption Value $0,00
WATER DISTRICT 5 Net Tax Value $392,057.00
01/01/09 Override Tax Value $0.00
httpJ/206.107.103.195paasl7DEST=pDetail 1/1

1/18/2017
Public Access I Edgecombe County
Home
LAND SEGMENTS
Parcel• 4812-22-1043-00 Address: 9117 NC 33 WEST Owner: WILSON, FRANKLIN JR
12 results returned, use search fields to filter results further.
SEGMENT TYPE
SIZE
VALUE
HOMESITE/PR/AVG [RP]
1.00
$16,000.00
WOOD/PAVED FAIR
36.02
$23,413.00
WOOD/PAVED GOOD
79.20
$87,120.00
PEANUTS [034G072H]
180761.0
$0.00
OPEN/PAVED VP
117,11
$93,688.00
OPEN/PAVED AVG
4.72
$7,552.00
TOBACCO [034G072H]
0.00
$0.00
WOOD/PAVED EXCL
44.65
$53,580,00
OPEN/PAVED GOOD
191.73
$345,114.00
OPEN/PAVED EXCL
7.45
$14,900.00
OPEN/PAVED FAIR
33.34
$46,676.00
WOOD/PAVED AVG
84.71
$80,475,00
http:11206.107.103.195/paas/?DEST=PLAN D&acton=undefined 1/1

i118/2017
Public Access I EdWcombe County
Home
BUILDINGS
Parcel: 4812-22-1043-00 Address: 9117 NC 33 WEST Owner: WILSON, FRANKLIN IR
6 results returned, use search fields to filter results further.
BUILDING SECTION
pUILDING USE
DEPRECIATED VALUE
TYPE S
RURAL HOMESITE
$62,474.00
BASE AREA
PORCH, OPEN, FINISHED
(10XB)
STORAGE
$400.00
(10XB)
STORAGE
$400.00
(1)
SHED
$2,112.00
OUTBUILDING MEASURED AREA
(1)
SHED
$100.00
OUTBUILDING MEASURED AREA
httlYM06.107.103.1951paasnOEST=pBLDGBacbon=undefined 111

0
[0j
0
0
.
dy�r
m
r
n
m
G r r rt
x
U.
o
a
max{
Cx
0' �'� N'n'
•� CC
C
d
`�
0
0
v oD O
w
A
:4 p N .+ r
r�
O
W
2Sa
aax>esssaaaaa
NAW N�
r+
o
O
O
Dl
a mC�Y�Cmm
•+ r •+ �+ �+ �+ >
H
z
y
S
rT,
A
S
W
:�+ .9+ d P.O
r�
tl
M
MAPP
N
Y
N
W
W
N
Y
.A
W
O
S� �00000 C
g
3ozzzzz000�dmm�
o
c=
A
A
ro
Cam]
r
Z
7ZC
�ao�vroro-oi0009
aaaCaaasaa
tltl
nn v
a
mA
O.JF`�
CD
��
ro
�
�
r
t*f
x
Y
Ce1
m
0
o
r
Z
G<�
vvvvvvCtv�yoo
mm o
�
W J
a
=.,
�
rrj
\
�?
no
O
C
G
ro
�o
a9O n?ro�COC
N
O
X
o
y
m
10
Nta''
d
N
=
z
o
a
N
W
y f/1
O N N fJY N A M N O H n
G
O
y
W
N
co
Y
�/
A
Qaq
N
zz
A!
CL
.Op
C
_
g
Q
n
�
�
r?
rM+
v
m
n
xn
m
o0 one
�O
r
ww
x
vs
N
s
to
e
�3m
o
n
o
n
D
Ln
Q
C
M
O
�
C
Y
14
M
�
P o�OmN a A4.
GP m Nud
O
O VI N N O O O O O O O N
.s
M
00 coo, 0 0 A
0 0 o G e
0 0 0 o n
n
O
d
p
m
uwi
pW+ V
�•
C
\
Q
O
O
N W
O
\
m
v�
zi
M
�
9
\
0
Q
6
v N
v�
O
V Y
to
m
HN MANA tNl: W m b
\U-\
C%
G
a
s
o'
c
co
�
O W O O D A N O. m O O M
\
N
"..
W
F•
G
A
O
C
�
M
N
V
W
0000000o0000n
iJ
s
a�
eD
eD
<
DJ
C
3
m
�
F
D
^+
\
Q
vn
�eo
�p
N e
H_ M N M R
ty
C
f°
:�
0
7•
t
C
.p
mNm pNp��
DO V Q A N .O m O A
14
A
W
n
R
tp
•.A
C
'-7
0 0 0 6 b b o o e o o e
0 o
C(+
N
0
C
�
m Y A A N T VI a
N
m
N
N
A i
-,pp F, Q, n
O W o O
yj/a
N
N
H
N
N
fD
y
?�
ram• rA•
DDDOcco DococC
N
V
to
YP
;P
m
w
N
DQ
fD
�
V
o p p p 4 p p p p p p p A
C
UI
V I
A
. p
co
O
O
O
O
N
Y
N
O
Y
-P.0
V
n
.D
R
w
V
00
T
.P
.A
OD
O
N
A
O
00
00
00000
W

Page 1 of 5
573 I,I E0 1 55
Doc ID: 002714t70005 Type. CRP
Recorded: 10/12/2011 at 02:32:23 PM
Fee Act: $26.00 Pane 1 of 5
b COUNTY,
t ReRld
Ron W Caroer gisterofDe
BK1573 P459-163
ihi� rrni ir• .h:r o n• art• ri lelinqucnt ad valorem real carats rake, which' ('ne
r dprrrmh Q,U I Tax Coll a ch ed with cellecting, that are alien on:
fintio. -
'rhi!, i� not a certification that this Edgecornbe County Tan Depmtrncnt Pin No.
ma 'hes this Deed description.
Date:
Tax Collator, Tax Assistant
PREPARED BY: Randall B. Pridgen
Battle, Winslow, Scott & Wiley, P.A.
P. 0. Box 7100
Rocky Mount, NC 27804-0100
NORTH CAROLINA
PARTITION DEED
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
Parcel No. 4012-22-1042-00 6 Portion of 4812-56-1128-00
THIS DEED made this the 7th day of September, 2011, by
and between NANCY WILSON BOWERS and husband, E.L. VINSON BOWERS,
whose address is 1005 Country Club Drive, New Bern, North
Carolina 28562, Grantor, to FRANKLIN WILSON, JR., whose address
is P.O. Box 1177, Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1177,
Grantee.
The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein
shall include said parties, their heirs, successors and assigns,
and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine and
neuter as required by context.
fK040# 0K
1. Grantor Nancy Wilson Bowers ("N. Bowers") and
Grantee are tenants in common of certain tracts or parcels of
land located on N.C. Highway 33, No. 5 Township, Edgecombe
County, North Carolina consisting of (i) a tract or parcel of
land containing 810 acres, more or less, located on both the
north and south sides of N.C. Highway 33, ("Tract 1") and (ii) a
Book: 1573 Page: 159 Seq: 1

Page 2 of 5
8§9t. 15 7 3 FAA 0 16 0
tract or parcel of land containing 430 acres, more or less,
located entirely on the south side of N.C. Highway 33, ("Tract
2").
2. N. Bowers acquired a one -tenth (1/loth) undivided
interest in Tract 1 by Deed of Gift recorded in Book 856, Page
422, Edgecombe County Registry. A forty-five percent (45t)
undivided interest each in Tract 1 was devised to N. Bowers and
Grantee by their mother, Nancy Brantley Wilson (see Estate file
No. 09E46, Office of the Nash County Clerk of Court). N.- Bowers
has this date conveyed a one -tenth (1/10) interest in Tract 1 to
Grantee and N. Bowers as tenants -in -common to effectuate the
division of Tracts 1 and 2 in the manner hereinafter provided.
N. Bowers and Grantee now own a fifty percent (501) undivided
interest each in Tract 1.
3. N. Bowers and Grantee acquired a fifty percent
(50%-) undivided interest in Tract 2 by deed dated January 19,
2009 from Franklin Wilson, Jr. and Nancy W. Bowers, Co -Trustees
under the Will of Franklin Wilson for the benefit of Nancy B.
Wilson recorded in Book /25, Page �,}3L, Edgecombe County
Registry.
4. N. Bowers and Grantee have agreed to divide Tract 1
and Tract 2 by exchanging partition deeds with respect to the
real property located south of NC Highway 33 and by the
conveyance by Grantee herein to N. Bowers of the real property
located north of NC Highway 33 by separate deed of even date
herewith.
NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor, in consideration of the exchange
of partition deeds, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey
unto the Grantee in fee simple, all of Grantor's rights, title
and interest ("Grantor's Interest") in and to the following
tracts or parcels of land situated in No. 5 Township, Edgecombe
County, North Carolina and more particularly described as
follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and by reference made a
part hereof (the "Wilson Property")
Grantor, pursuant to N.C.G.S. Section 105-317.2,
hereby certifies that the Wilson Property does not include the
primary residence of Grantor.
Book: 1573 Page: 159 Seq:2

Page 3 of 5
650'� 15 7 3 DGI 0 1 61
This conveyance is made subject to taxes and easements
of record.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD Grantor's Interest in and to the
Wilson Property and all privileges and appurtenances thereto
belonging to the Grantee in fee simple, free and discharged of
any and all claims or interests of the Grantor.
Grantor covenants with Grantee that Grantor has done
nothing to impair such title as Grantor received and Grantor
will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of
all persons claiming by, under or through Grantor (except for
the exceptions stated above) and no further.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor and Grantee have
executed this instrument the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR:
E.I..
M 11c _� i3o w' s�AI.)
Book: 1573 Page: 159 Seq. 3

Page 4 of 5
Mr, 1Sl3PAU0162
NORTH CAROLINA
C0'3e-\ COUNTY
1,1 vA f' "1t 1'4' -z -- , a Notary Public of C ° mot~ County and
State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that Nancy Wilson Bowers and husband, E.L. Vinson Bowers
(the "Signatory"), personally appeared before me this day and by authority duly given, acknowledged the
due execution of the foregoing instrument.
I certify that the Signatory personally appeared before me the day, and (check one of the
following)
(1 have personal knowledge of the identity of the Signatory); or
(I have seen satisfactory evidence of the Signatory's identity, by a current or state or
federal identification with the Signatory's photograph in the form of: (check one of the following)
a drivers license or
in the form of ); or
(a credible witness has sworn to the identity of the Signatory).
The Signatory acknowledged to me that he/she voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the
purpose stated therein and in the capacity indicated.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal this ( 4" day of 0<`�bc— , 2011.
'
Nota p b is
L r,I ryY• ��t.., a 1.
(Note: Notary Public must sign exactly as on notary seal)
My Commission Expires:
[NOTARY SEAL]
(MUST BE FULLY LEGIBLE)
This certifies that there are no delinquent ad
valorethe Re
'c'" rl/r%11111.0 County m realestate
esCollec or islch harged eco�mb h
collecting, that are a lien on Pin Number:
�q-TAR v
This is not a certification that this
�p No U Edgecombe County Tax Department Pin Number
matches this Deed description.
�����` Date:
�N C 0V ���` Tax Collector
�Il1111f llllll
Book: 1573 Page: 159 Seq:4

Page S of 5
G`p� 15 7 3 PAGE 01 6 3
EXNTSTT "A"
THE WILSON PROPERTY
Being Tract A containing
survey entitled "Recombination
Nancy W. Bowers" dated March 7,
Edgecombe, State of North
Associates, Professional Land
2011 in Plat Cabinet 11, Slide
599.93 acres as shown on that
Plat for Franklin Wilson, Jr. &
2011, Township No. 5, County of
Carolina, by S.D. Puckett &
Surveyors, recorded August 19,
Edgecombe County Registry.
F�\APP5\NP51\PRIOGEN\CLIENTS.OTHER\Nilson, Prank\Partition Deeds\Partition peed. Nancy to Frank.
clean.8-16-11.doe
(s)ab � -p'p- oriso
Book: 1573 Page: 159 Seq: 5

Page ! of 3
I
NORTH CAROLINA,
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
�• �uU
THIS DEED OF GIFT made this OW day of July, 1976,
by and between NANCY a. WILSON and husband, FRANK WILSON, SR.,
of Nash County, North Carolina, parties of the first part, and
NANCY B. WILSON, JR. of 700 Falls Road, Rocky Mount,'Nash
County, North Carolina, 27801, party of the second part;
WITNESSETH:
That the said parties of the first part in considera-
tion of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable considerations
to them paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt
of which is hereby acknowledged, have bargained and sold, and
by these presents do grant, bargain, sell, and convey unto the
party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, a one -tenth
(1/10th) undivided interest in certain tracts or parcels of
land in the County of Edgecombe, State of North Carolina, and
more particularly described as follows:
FIRST TRACT: All that certain tract or parcel of
land containing Seven Hundred Eighty-seven (787) acres,
more or less, in No. 5 Township, Edgecombe County, North
Carolina, known as a portion of the THEODORE FOUNT$IN
"TATUM AND COKER FARMS", located on the Tarboro-Whitakers
Highway, beyond the village of Leggetts, about '9 miles
northwesterly from Tarboro and lying on both sides of
said highway, adjoining Swift Creek on the southwest
and Moore's Swamp on the Northeast, bounded now or
formerly on the North by said Moore's Swamp and lands
of Arthur Fountain; on the East by lands of Arthur)
Fountains on the South mostly by Swift Creek and partly
by the lands of the C. L. Fountain heirs; on the West,
the lands of the C. L. Fountain heirs, Mrs. Barbara P..•
House and Arthur Fountain, being more particularly
described according to a survey and plat prepared by
T. L. Moore in 1934, replatted and surveyed along the
boundary lines of SWift Creek by Cooper and Carlisle,
October 25, 1938, a copy of'which plat is now'on file..
1
1
1
Book:856 Page:422 Seq: 1

Page 2 of 3
1
eoux 856 PA023
with the Federal Land Bank of Columbia, and being the
same lands described in a deed of trust from W. 0,
House and wife, Barbara P. House, to H. C. Leaman,
Trustee for the Land Bank Commissioner, dated April.
15, 1939, recorded in Book 377,•page 16, in the office
of the Register of Deeds for Edgecombe County. See
deed from Barbara P. House et al to Julian C. Brantley,
Jr, et al recorded in Book 415, at page 207, Edgecombe
County Registry.
SECOND TRACT: Beginning at a stake on the road
leading from Leggetts to Whitakers, the corner of Lot.
02; thence along said road north 53 deg. 30''west
feet to a bend in the road; thence north 31 deg. 15'
west 396 feet to a stake, Cotton's corner; thence
south 56 deg. east 520 feet to a stake; thence north
16 deg. west 132 feet to a stake; thence east 1555
feet to an iron stake near a large pine, a corner in
the line of Lot 1.12; thence along the line of Lot #2
south 27 deg. 30' west 1150 feet to the road, the
point of beginning, containing 22.09 acres, more or
less. Being Lot #3 as shown on Map and survey made by
T. L. Moore, which map is dated December 29, 1934,
and recorded in Map Book 21 at Page 109, in the Register
of Deeds office in Edgecombe County. See deed From
Barbara P. House et al to Julian C. Brantley, Jr. et
al recorded in Book 415, at page 207, Edgecombe County
Registry.
The aforesaid parcels of land are the same parcels
of land with respect to which a 4/5 undivided interest
in the same was conveyed to Nancy B. Wilson by Julian
C. Brantley, et al., by deed dated December 29, 1949,
and recorded in Book 475 at page 360 in the office of
the Register of Deeds for Edgecombe County.
The aforesaid conveyance is made subject to a deed
of trust in favor of the Federal Land Bank of Columbia,
South Carolina, to the lien of ad valorem taxes, and to
easements of record,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid one -tenth (1/10th)
undivided interest in said tracts or parcels of land and all
privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging to the said
party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, to their only
use and behoof forever.
And the said parties of the first part do covenant
with said party of the second part, that they are seized of
said premises in fee and have the right to convey the same in
2
Book:856 Page:422 Seq: 2

Page 3 of 3
BOOK 856 PACE424
fee simple; that the same are free and clear from all encumbrances,
except as herein stated; and that they will warrant and defend
the said title to the same against the claims of all persons
whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said parties of the first
part have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year
first above written.
//Gtihcu 1• J-� (SEAL)
Nanc B. dilson
7
�) (SEAL)
F an W son, Sr.
STATE OF NORTH C LINA
COUNTY OF "/
I, (\�%/�/`r(%J, a Notary Public,
in and for th County and State atbresald, do hereby certify
that Nancy B. Wilson and husband, Frank Wilson, Sr., personally
appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution
of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and notarial seal, thi day of
July, 1976.
SANDRA K. f:DWARDS
NOTARY PUBLIC �diJ
NASH COUNTY, N, C. - `Notary Publ1c
My Commission expires: ,p - ?-a
NORTI{ CAROL NA, EDGECOMB.S COUNTY
the xo ng cartiff to ( of
a Notary Public, is (are) certified to be eorrect
Thls instrument was presented for registration
and recorded in this offfc Ii Bool�paga
This duy of 1C
'It I I', r� D o'clock 0
Register of Deods ��rY�•
BY 3
Denury
I-
Book;856 Page:422 Seq: 3

v amec►
foster
wheeler
APPENDIX B
EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck®

CCX Site
9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW
TARBORO, NC 2788E
Inquiry Number: 4830486.2s
January 18, 2017
6 Armstrong Road. 4th floor
Shelton. CT 06484
(rEDR'
Toll Free:800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBC-SPM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-----------------------------------------..--------------
ES1
Overview Map -----------------_ ---------------------------------------
-- 2
DetailMap -----------------------------------------
--- 3
Map Findings Summary---------------------------- - -- ------
--------- 4
MapFindings-------------------------------------------------
---------- 8
OrphanSummary-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9
Zip Scan Report ---------------------------- --------------
ZIP-1
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking- - - - -. - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary- - - - - - - - - _ - _
Physical SettingSSURGOSoilMap-------------------------------------------------------------
A-5
Physical Setting Source Map------------------------------------------------
A-12
Physical Setting Source Map Findings- _ -. - - - - - _ _
- - - - A-14
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------
PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources- NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC4830486.2s Page t

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW
TARBORO, NC 27886
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.9976000 - 35' 59' 51.36"
77.6065410 - 77' 36' 23.54"
Zone 18
265040.7
3986624.2
59 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map
Version Date:
Northeast Map:
Version Date:
Southwest Map:
Version Date:
Northwest Map:
Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
5945661 TARBORO, NC
2013
5946137 DRAUGHN, NC
2013
5944948 HARTSEASE, NC
2013
5945861 WHITAKERS, NC
2013
Portions of Photo from: 20140521
Source: USDA
TC4830486.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW
TARBORO, NC 27886
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
4830486.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL ------------------------- National Priority List
Proposed NPL --------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL ---------------- National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY --------- . Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS------------------------ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE_ Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF----------------- RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG------------------. RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG--------------- RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS------------------------ Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS --------- Engineering Controls Sites List
TC4830488.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US INST CONTROL_________ Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_______________ Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS----------------------- . Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI___________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST_________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST ------------------------- Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST___________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST__________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST__________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control /engineering control registries
INST CONTROL ------------- No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP------------ �____. Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP__________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS__________ A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF______________________ Solid Waste Facility Listing
TC4830486.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SWRCY______________________ Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI------------------ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9------ ___-. Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI-------------------------- Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS ---------- _ Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_______________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL --------------------- National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS_______________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS_______________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD---------------------- _---
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90-------------------.
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80-------------------.
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR--------- RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS--------------------- ___ Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD_________________________ Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS__-_-_. State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST ------------
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _. 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
IRIS_________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS-------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD_________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP------------------------- Risk Management Plans
RAATS_______________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP-------------------- ______
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS------------------------ PCB Activity Database System
ICIS------------------------
-- Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS -------------------------
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS------------------------
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE-------------.
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER-_-_____
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO --------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS-------------------
FIFRAiTSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS-------------
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT-------------------
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP---------------------
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS ----------- _
Lead Smelter Sites
TC4830486.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US AIRS_____________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES --------------------
Mines Master Index File
FINDS________________________
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO --------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC------ _--------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
COAL ASH___________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS--------------
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance__________
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES----------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC ------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
ABANDONED MINES -----
Abandoned Mines
ECHO_______________________
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto________________ EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner ------------- EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS___________________. Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC4830486.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 2 records.
Site Name
CAROLINA TELEPHONE
TARBORO-EDGECOMBE AIRPORT
Database(s)
LAST
SEMS-ARCHIVE
TC4830486.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 4830486.2S
Target Property
o 114 to 1 MISS
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Indian Reservations &A Hazardous Substance
•
Sites at elevations lower than
10o-year flood zone Disposal Sites
the target property
�
500-year flood zone
A
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Wetland Inventory
National Priority List Sites
State Wetlands
Dept. Defense Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: CCX Site CLIENT: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
ADDRESS: 9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW CONTACT: Vicki Garlington
TARBORO NC 27886 INQUIRY #: 4830486.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.9976177.606541 DATE: January 18, 2017 10:52 am
Copyrlyhl -t 2017 EDP, int.: 205 TomTam Rea. 2015

DETAIL MAP - 4830486.2S
*
Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
•
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
l
Manufactured Gas Plants
•
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
r
0 116 1!! 114 Wes
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
100-year flood zone Disposal Sites
500-year flood zone i
■ National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: CCX Site CLIENT: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
ADDRESS: 9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW CONTACT: Vicki Garlington
TARBORO NC 27886 INQUIRY #: 4830486.2s
LAT/LONG 35.9976 / 77.606541 DATE: January 18, 2017 10:54 am
Copynpht� 2017EM, Inc. , 2C15 TomTom R#I 2015

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2-1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-CESQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal leaking storage tank ►ists
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC4830486.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF
0.500
SWRCY
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
ODI
0.500
IHS OPEN DUMPS
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
TP
US CDL
TP
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
TP
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
TP
SPILLS
TP
IMD
0.500
SPILLS 90
TP
SPILLS 80
TP
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
TC4830486.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
US FIN ASSUR
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
EPA WATCH LIST
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
TSCA
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
TRIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
SSTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
RMP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
RAATS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PRP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PADS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ICIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
MLTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COAL ASH DOE
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
PCB TRANSFORMER
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
RADINFO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
HIST FITS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
DOT OPS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
LEAD SMELTERS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
US AIRS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
FINDS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
DOCKET HWC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
Financial Assurance
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NPDES
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
UIC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ABANDONED MINES
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
ECHO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
Total
Plotted
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS TP
NR NR NR NR NR 0
TC4830486.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Database (Miles) Property
RGA LF TP
RGA LUST TP
- Totals -- 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
Total
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
114 - 112 112 - 1 > 1
Plotted
NR
NR
NR NR NR
0
NR
NR
NR NR NR
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
TC4830486.2s Page 7

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
NO SITES FOUND
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
TC4830488.2s Page 8

� a
CD 0
O r-
Oz
D
m �
Q m
G) r
m m
C) ro
00
co z
m m
m
a
O
x
x

0
A
co
W
O
co
O
N
(A
m
0
c
co
d
V
SU
CD
CD
Al
J J v J J J J J v J V J J V J V J J V V J J J J J v J J J v J J J J J J J J V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V
4 V V V V V V V
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 4 0 o O g Q O o 0 0 0 0 0 0
lD(D00(D(DfD(DfDVofDO](D fO CD (D (D lO fD fD (D (D (D (D (D CD tO tP tD tDfO(D(P(D1DlD0](0<D �D 10 tD VJ<D1D<D �D O<D (D <D tD 1D <D N(D (D00N0(P0(P0W00
fn����Cnfny�(n(nmC(nCyC�yCU)�(nC�-` �-'-'C�fn(nV1C-'-`CCCC��y�CC��C�C�CCC�CC����C�CC
NOW (mM1 �WWONNNmO +NNNQyA10sV7W�W(4A,,)1 pWO.N+p�Ns�p�WSpOOO0 00IDV $W0o�00O 0N0V 0V Of0V�NW�4OWNW�0VO0NVV�A�AW WO0NA 0VV0�AVV� �ApOo N��OVf�AW�T VVNUA1AV(hOwNI0O�Vp0VN0W0N)0
80bOO OWV OO
VVpWmmW V
WDW00mWWwADOwWAOy.VM(Ww—�V VWV
WAOW0NA
r mmWO WVVOmN Om WWPWW(ptDOOOON AOWANnNDD2!W2o
wtv 0 W A-4WNIAVN NO NAWWVNmO
O oAOVVVOOfW�SNp�N�QACT��V-VNOpD00Q
VOtWAOiO WJN�OWS�AjpV�NmNW NONVm0V tP('nW0to NOPcO �WVV
NO
�Z:i Z:l O O Q--�o — 0-- --o— O--OOOO==yZOOZ-O—01000—OO='r
�Z0-�00
pmp o(D O NOOO O WOO SONG NSSNNNNSO O(npp000pON00 No �pN NS SOS N08N
WON ON v W PJJN N WEB Wa O22 JTOODtD 01 b SNN0 JONDJ W� 000ONy�N 2!woDo2z, o
cDOA W NmSO1 (Nj1 0VN VOm7 "'T � 0 J N A WV�Sp00 M NT�WJ OfN OWN�A NmJOmi�(DSIn
�N
p0p O(j( V NTN V(�1 0�01 AWN (Dp�ANO)m Z, VW�Am0om0mAmNVN�N�001 jmy
AAm O� 01d 06 O)m AV W NONO WVV N V 0 �N070o
owV s 0oW mN NW 0 ww tDNoO J(D V N O w010 m
0) N O) M W N 0) A N N 0 t0 A (0 (D O t � V 10
N 0o N y V A
W �[D NO Vo A WO VW O ow TO1S Ww 00 C. (D-4 co V
ZwmwmDDggTmmQrT omwowmm mmo T0mTKO-Immnwmmmmw00mTT��00L�TmAmM�mmrw�z
>ccc0KK--x>DC00 DaD0xmm000 O-aD00mvmmc5>6w6 mm�x Ommaoa,OKDDFDDnxXOD00
=mmmOmmrrrWlc�*r « z�mmm�ao ���nz��OoL-�OOL---mr-0<mmnam.<9mmnmmOOaPZA
z777onnrmmzm 0m-mr--mvv mmm-- ZZ�
22S Grr�� �77 omm zzZ-r mm :u-n MM0DD0•< aaD ZZ ���� {� 177mOwz
Tzz-Iwa zz—�DG)G) O OMDD D1 � m(n 00.._._ 0�� D w G)O m rmL7 G)0 m0
DDD ZZ m
naan0zzKKK0000m .,z -z ZZO .QcrrwwKAavO0mzZ0mmxmO mmrM>m-(n ODnZOm
?---Z riG�L�000mm0 pb310mT000Q(i ='"��rr� A-A0z OOO��TO•� 0ox;UMi�E00Q.00m�moiO2D
0zz2� Dm]o --u-u z 7A�Ovm77mtnu)co m<ZZ`�rm zo< =_�<mmmrm DM��mZoRoOOR;MMO—`t
m�AA ���000�� «O< DDMMm OK(ncn zmz ZDZCn(n3•m « �'f0�70w�(DmA m
m m TTwMw m� m zz--cn zOcc <m �zm00(`)n Mm><{-0 v0
�OOOD TTx >zD Ocm2 000 _ICE W�7ma lmo n 0 O j<d O QO
ccc 000 9 0m
FV000D Tv0 -40 z: 000Om mm m nmzZ 0 L`
m��1-i O
mmr D �Z,3 Zzzz DDD (n �(nTv r z
MUM (nNd mA �r mr 00 r,ax -i r�mm O
0---3) m D Tzz O mo-- z O
9CziCzin c U)) mm Xmm m Om__ T
D 0 O 0 70U O 00
<0 r
N N�WVVVVAOD oow NNNT--2�10f0)VVV VV01N Nx2VVV0>x xxx22-4-4 3) X 0 M m m X m �o X M X m m m m--...._
OOW�+W(D CDVVWAA-+NO O(D tO CD— NNNNV VN(D 0 Oo �00W OOM-4 OOOOO-"'�-1-4000000
OOWwwW(D 0(DOVmOON000NNN 0 01WN L"W WO)ANN NNN G)L�G)G)OO m�NNN
DDDx�wwwwo omomm mwww mmxm--CC- -CCCCC CCC
rrrmmmDammmm. ZZZ*ZZZZzz Zzz=xAAzxxzwwggggxxmmA•41mmmm-A-0 mmm_Zzz
mmccc-mm D{DDDm{mm00m>000000 000*6000.0*5099>DDn� 88_____ oo __00,
Oammm=unpm,mr-r-r-,41DZZmjvJv pw WOAOOAOAt(p< .1,* WWWWwwmw mmmmm VV mmmAAA
O O 2 x 2 0 r r m m r r r 0 0 x(D G V
OODDDTmmmmmmmmrr rAA�V���T T aOnNN p m 000boo0� 00000 000°D O'co
mm**gym-<00wmmmmmmoo co O' .< < O x xxXxX
En (n D D D 0 w m m m 0000 a) mw A 0 A A X ZZZ ZZ-- VV��� VV,4
�-qZZZODD��Q0003)77� N ow m W mmm S VVNNN
O00 CCclnmmm>>nD wV� =2z J?D
Tom 7o mmmmmmmmm 00
m 3j
oocoo
D
v
wwwwwwOwmwmmWmmmmmmmmmmmaomm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmcnmmmmmmmm
DnaaanODaaannnaanaaanannnnD DDDDDDDD0QDDDDDDDDDDDDD➢D>>>M➢DDSDDDDDDDDDDDD
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmm « mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmAmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmwmmmOmmmmmmmmOmmmmmmmmmmm mmmwmmww��wwwmwwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
000000000000000mo0000000000 00000000Q0000000000000000000M00000000000C
m27770w]]T. 7)3JmwwwT7,l031m7J ]]]7mmmmm7] mAmmm]]AmCC91)777)713)T7o7)707)317)]7377o 3127 Cn >Jmm7om31 JJ 7J ]o 31m 37
000000 00000000 00000000000 0000000OZZ000000000000000000 000000000000
1�
ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ZZZZZz2ZzzzzzzzzzzzzZZzzzzzzzZZZZZZzzZzzz
000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
m Z T m m m m T r Z Z C r C m C T T C Z T Z c T T(n m T T— T
OTzOZ m OZC-a-vwc g0zz0T2-00zza Ozz0Oz
]]00�Om0 7Jp� 00���371001000�p0o m00- 0
xm(n, ch n(n mm 2 w(n MOM momr-
o O m o m O o. O U) wo. n
o o �
n L)
m CD 0 (a to C
C 7 C
(D
0 01 0
m
m
CnZzcoo zzz0000zozozwCACnZOOZZOZOZOW
'A 000-1-1�0 00
?-1-1m0�0�0-1��0��00 T0-40•"(-1
w (n- w o (n , > (n (n (n (n (n cn > (n (n
c z 0 0
0i 0 (A
O O O
3 G) G)
T
0
A
P.

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N "N N N N to" "m N N N
V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V J V J J V J V J J J J V J V V V J J V J J V J J V J J J J V J V J V V V V J J J V J V J J J V J
00 W 0o OMM WOO COMM WW MODW W WWW WWW MOD MOM WOGWW MOD W W WW W WW WWW COW WWW WW WOOD WW W WWWW WW WOo00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O CD O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O
O fD tD CD tD CD (p CD CD tDWCDW WCD WtD CD fD (D fD OfD CD CD tD CDOtD CD CDOfD tD tD CDcDCDCD CD CDOOOCD CD CD CD CD CD OCD OCOOOCD O CD(DCDCOOOCDO
C �y��������� ��C�CC�C�CCCy yrA -•ln ._. � C��y1��f/7�yry1Cs�C�ys�������y
O O O O pO— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p�-a p Opp----lsp��� 00000000000�1�00 O-•-� 0.+��O.a O �.wr�000p0�00�����p
V"W1 WAVM 0)0 WMAVWV 'n V'. ,..,V(,,7V�WW N O'V � LnV AO) V�W��JOfV�VAVN�VV�V�J 010�0�01V WOi�
V NCD ..W �Cp �DOONQ�CT W�DV C�IJWVAAV�JAWWW O A 0 D1VVW (J� WACD CpW Cp CD Cp AV0).N NWWW�A�
N CD CT NCp WCD�A QA M VA CT �D (TW Np�OWWNya,OWWp�W wo, W NNWO ADD(DWT �AA�O-�W�,,�O�DW��NNN�VNJ yip
�J WWOCOWCD�DOUIW �8WWV CnA CTWA V N V 10 <O �OWCD 2cn' O WC"WA 0-MWWCDT VUI -'OfWWWDI ppArnOIDWWNT•+cDo
AONp�NVV�VWtOTO�VT CD�tD Cp D�A�yOVVI C3I N CT�WV1 W WOOfN WNfD iON D�0 U1 VOCp NCpONNW(n�OAW AIVO WCp
07T V W V J NUt N CD W�NWW CD Of O VV O NN co N[T V VV Tp� CT (n N s V jWWN ,ro NV fD NO WWWOMM OChWM WN0
<DWOVIWWVNNNAVON N(DT NOVOWOVOWWJAtD—O— W -+WV OD�N AW —CJ1W ppW�V WCDW-j VOCDM T—
N Z y== Z
0 00? omO00000
O 0 0 O 0 0 0 N
ocoocoa0000 om
N O O O W N N
—
oo
O — — p p s= Z=
poo 0 0 o p0000 Oooa 0
W
O 0 0 O O O O O T O
W 1,�� NCDOOOW"'
W 0 N(70TWN0
V OWWW CJI Omm"r'
O O O O O A
m2Q02a2NNN O
W�WOCDWNWWp� W
W�WOOW Vd)VA Df
2c,
A
coO
WW
O O O O O d O O N _O 0 0 100 O
WSW A O�ON
CWJ N N W WWOW (ONOA N
V�D (� O (A WO)UIW V C�
O NWW OO ONOOW
NAN AW WOW N
W
�VOCn
SOW aD W V ONNN� O��D W
W WN WZ� jCD�AW
O 00C1� <A NN +1
WpJNNNNW
(� U1 O 09 �
A j N
VT
O�
OW W O N mW A Of 0>AW W
ON Wpp N W� W VWtppDpp N
ro N Ac ot
co WW
A W V A W
stD
cco OO V
�
G�moppmmmmmmmmrozzz
>mO>'oovvvvmtm0
cicicici
- - mmmCCTmooKm-�J'n0
oOsx-<yyrD
r-K--or(
-40M
O
mrr
rODOmo �TmmmmOCxmo>000m00O
rr-C--
cm
r-WZzc—OomMTmmwm_0zz
]nppmmmmmmmmr-000
<0000ccc)<
K K a 00 o n� m m� o
T
am
r-r-
oommmmrrONNDTTOmmlmmm
Zlm�mrC�T
iOOOOODD�w
�n
OO,-o7mmcmTb
mTxz�
vWONp
i
onnnmWmmXxyx=mmn,I
Fozmm� mmmmOmX
o�
O
D>DDimmXVynK-1
nO00O-Imy>D
-
Oin 9an7oxrym<<mmmmmma
m)-4myvA
+-OO>mR�0
iio
1I
m
O
vMmmmmOm[-QTT
T mm
O
r-m
Mnmml
-4
mm MW>Mmx
mm
��_
O
>
v
MvTOOmm<<0-
mm-ommmmmmmmmm»>
AmOO�Zz
�DD�D
>(i
��m0cccc8moO
�
ZO���OOOOOOO
m_zm
< O O
TTcc mmj m
yDp
��mz_mmmZDmm
<Ao0mmm00
Ojnr-rr-r,
Z
z
m Z O
m a
co
n
OTTZxnz rrn0 D<-<
O Oy 1
00000rrZ--
mLG7G)0
m Z
POmm
��a -j DCm
PD
x0 O NNN
1
m
a-00as 0y
-
z -z0• mmmy
--IOD�v
F.
r "N
-
0v
zz0Dm�m
D0
m D
03
v{ m {
m D
m
7nd0Om_I
Z >
mm m n�
• O
r O
0
T
=+
:< =! m !n
�W-4 WWWWWD�O+Z ZiD ip� AA-�Nf71CWJICJICW7ICW*14W0 C}C�Ch C1�Ul
r QMm WWMWWWM(nv)zZ
xvT7.00000000M13MMm
w>P--0000rvootoOoO
-ipAmmmmmmmmm(Ov«<
M000055555D5 mmm
mr-r— IIII ��D
��'r"�irrrrrrr W
myyv :qmmmmmmm�{_�
"0000000
mmaxnxmxvn 0�0�
OZm 40000000-4pTymmxmmoXxm mmm�
z mmnODvvvvo xxm
_vavo X
A N
w
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
DDDD➢➢DDDDD➢DDDDD
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmm0a0000mwmWmmw
00000000000000000
707Jm7Dm70]]7}J7707J7I1�31�m70
00000000000000000
ANN KNNNJVVV�AWC
W 0000 OOOVV(�NOy
W y�NNDWWOCSIW ffjj��OD W
Z Z��ZCC z+�OCriW AyxO
CC zzzzy z
m m m b M� y K D 0 0 0 0-4x= 0
9_�aax-�a—cnzmmmmmc*x_
Az DOmmz-i�M� x<0
:Ixmw(, mOAoW;'WNyorL
y70��� _� imZ-D<
--IHmJmW
m o
yy� -m-i X_O < m
7�o z x z
Tq �W m
m
O
m
D
O
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
D➢D➢D➢DD➢DD➢D>c>>
r r rr rrrr r m
rnmmmmmmmmmmmmm mm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
0000000000000000
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm mm
00000000000000000
J JJJ 0—
A NN N�OWWWWWWW WCDOOWWOCO [DO�DVVVVWN
Ui CnWW Vy=tO CD (O CO CDOTT mR10001-00NNNN0�
0000 D>D==000=rr-XKmccm000000000�
==22 Sxnr➢-ra-� � �T00-��0O zmvTmmmmTTm
�OL�O Da*T.iixxx---po�p�p�:y000000000z
=xxx g�axxxxxn mmyy�o� v>>> �
�nnz {�{xM>>>x ��yrno�>��0
<{« yy-vv-+T-na �100000000000
-S�6$ mmm XxX G)G) --00vzZov-0vvro'
0 I� ovv �< mm mmm
R-MIlUm
x oo < <
m zz
m mm
D
y 22
m mmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmy
D D D D➢ D O➢ D D➢➢ D D D D D D D D➢ D D D D D➢ D➢ D D O
I A � �0 )11111111 lrl�l 111�1�rs
m mmmm m<mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm=
M mmmm MEliJmmmmmmmmmmmmmWmmmmmm mmmT
0 0000 000000000000000000000000000
M mmm7] 9C777�mDmm77mmm7�mm]�mm�mm�7�7Jm��
0 0000 OZ000000000000000000000000
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
00000000000000000 00000000000000000 O 0000 000000000000000000000000000
m c)m TC-1Z-4— --Ixm6 xMonmz!c MCC r MGGC mzmy
Zzzc(naiJ]OZZ00m0Zyzyyzczyyy TCZoRoRoz�Kmtow—ZT— ZTZT 0Zz0ZTZZOKKKKZ N
vyvv�y00-0- yxo000. mrymo
y yy >M>-n y y-�y mr a yraS32yT 7x TymT ymym yy mmwwp y a
y Z 0 z zz(A �i C y� Cy N y r" Z y N Z coZ y y y Z0 N
m N y jj o -y-1 0 Cp = N mp
O » -� CD z
c C c c c D
z
o o 0 o y
v
0
m
0
00
N_
n
O
CL
(v
U)
O
m
c�
O

v V V V Vp V4 V J V V J J v v J V J v v v J v v J J J J v v J J J V J V J v v V J Jp-J v J Jp Jp v V v v V V Jp-J J V V J J J V V J J J V V V J
O O O M OD Oo m M m 000 W M OCOOOOOODOOOCOOODCOOODco MOOOCOMoCOCOOODCOWOOWoCOOWDm OWOOWDM0Mu0WOW@OWDOm000 mccoo m 0e 0Wo COOCCOOCO03 CoOWo 0 CD00000000000000
co
OD OOCO OD
mrnmrnrnmmmmrnmw mrnmrnrnmv�rnmrnmrnmmrnmrnmrnrnmrnrnrnrnmrnmrnrn rnmrnmmmmrnmrnmmrncnancnwaucoaucncoanu,<ocoan
C C-`�C-♦����CC �wVIC �CCC�CCC�������Cl)(A���C�C�CC C��C�����C�������sN����C�C
O O O O O O O g 0 0 0 0 0 O O o O o O o o O o 0 o 0 0 0 o s o O o O O d o d O d d o O o 0 0 o 0 o d O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O d o 0
000000�00000 00000000 000-0� 1�00000000 0000000�oo�3oyooM�oyo�•000
W �VV�VOOOVV�W USN A�V�(,,OsV���NVVANWO �T(n -i .VO— U1...•VfD... M M 0 OD(0 �0000 V N V V 07NOOAVQI .. V�
Op�OIV �VNOOVV�� 0�w0� V N��V����VVN �OD0�6+U7V �V—VW� -�VQ(—O)Q+ONTsNNV—VVO1Ut 0(T WfO�VA
w (p (D N(p yOOW00•pA to w4 ONoA OD00DM C90"+"�A 000 A OO'i-F Ut0 W 1%(W "•N OD (p O Ulm U1 V1--'�-+N O�U1-+-� O �+N 010NAA{O UL�pNW
UtmA OU(nP WWp�A mot
AWAV�VVV[nd oOO U(m N(p�U1O CnO WO(OO (A 01 OWNWO�Wcn 01V Q�d mA(n (DO mCnN VOOWdI
'V N_pvpcnA rnaDNOV OOOA OWOVt us Ut(TW WOOAWN(nW�W NAAOOW01 �(p OOWdD AA o[o ((JJ11Vo0�0o A(oo(o cnornW((���0OOA(•0 (n
_, W4WAN000 ?NOW N(oJAWVW(OOVM-40OWA(NRAN�OW1 W 61NAtOO�VNv(OD O�fAW WN�N00 yOJ oODN ODVNOOfW�WO,p,WA
00=0= Z=-00 _ -0-0-00 O-•- c-+��- 0 ____ _ _ -+ZO=_O
Wo 0 0 o 0 00866 O 0 W O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O o o O O 6 0 6 0 6 0 6886888 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0- O N
00 0 000 0 0 00000QO o 0 0 0 00 000 oy o00000 0 p� o
�O��VI V1 07yr) N�NNNW��O W(ON 1 828,20 UI�NONNN N� W-•��W N Of W_.O
A WDD�N� �y QD�VV N�pOOfO0N��VQDNNNW O MSMdD 0D Dp VI pD OD �(hA A�VAVVV V O MMMom W NONQDV
m�NW�Q( 0(U101ON cdOmAArn�AfOi N(O M M.1 0W ID V Of (00-4'0 V000'01 mU1A"WAW Wm V(O VVAtO -LL ONNO�
N. .V♦ o0 VWTVVUi0 W (o , 6W 0000 to VO)OIAVV M jW
OW _ (OA-+ N A -4 wVVON V O O E2 (ow owo 0 yV Lpn M W,0 _ O
AA N(OAN A J wOD(00 ND(NOW(ND(On a`°D J W D7 (Vo0 WNT (An (n0O0A(Oi ww o MR ON
co Uf A OAV� O N 0, MM nNo V O N O AV NOD-+ 0 WwO j(0W N O
5nnD➢0DD0P-> ORsnOOXXDomoomovmQm>DDO>OOKKUC as{>cDMTZ>O2o>D 00O >m0occW
m m q
KMMmmZr-Y0oom mEo, y6m4zp-<mD-WGm,mC)jr-r-zz,00m��m MMMOOOMTOp2-UZWM06W mo00D>x
mmZrr OOm x� x r
T00DUMMnfm Zl o mmxCO yO�m vm mOODrzOOD 00 CICNDOX<- oO�mmFOm-A mOo�mmW
OO O OO x 1O mm A Z
0m9 CDpg000 DnOommD�mr0OroMZmmMm�A2 -0-0 > mmmrOMMM�CimW --I X-Dowlm
WZAAOOa�
Ommrnzrxxm O O rmO M m53MmmAmM,>"Xr m ]7 pT r ern mZ�OOmz r'D-�Z Zmmo
>�mm�yy0 rnZ<m�Om�n�mOrmOmO➢n� � m>>K0 x OZOm��00c rc➢nmmr,
1np7omm�<O MOOwxm�7Oc<O�0 MKMOK`Onam m '{mmwz OT WKQW Z03 z>xm Z
Ozz mmm�=zz �0 9zmrZ�m��m z�ZZO y MmzO O0> DD-- z
T ➢ G)00 -� 1{D Om D QZOD C = Oo OK twoo >
m m n ifs m z M y G)0 m m� =gip �' mm M
O O m v 2 0 of m0 r- �D 2 00 8�m ➢NN O O D m
m r Z O x O z r �1 in �> O0 rww x
m
a c o m Z o� mmp mG) m 00
Z m P v p v; 1Z m r
m Z u, Z DO n
�37mm17m222222 2V�777]mmmmmm77mmmmmCpf/�UfxJ]m227]3Jm7Jm 70m7J (!�(/�U�(ACIf(!�(/�U��(o(ommV
�0000-1��5555 �(°r'(n0000001-q-4-10000MMM6005$�0000-A moo �>>>>>>>Inn(n�00�!
ACcccw =222 =-ACCCCCCmmmNcccc---mccm CCCCm ACC ��-4-D-1��-A--Aw 0W,,
Z�-4��mmmmxNN 2_C-i-i-4-i-A--iN NN �p�1--1100 D. �� ����� �� mmmmmmmmcnmwl x
nWWWw p�pmanna ➢G%ONNNNNNDDDONNNNOW4Dm R1+nNymmm mm 2�72�y=�oxx�oOvvO
Z000"IMMM0DOw(VNNN '1`em22O000MMXW➢OO O Now= MMMMO00p Dn OODODVOD02ZmmWW�
zXxxx w�+N(h w
�XXXXv OD OD 03m W>Z 5xxxxoym Jpmp�� O O XXXX xm W-----��WmmDDT.
NwZ Z ON W � OO OW D O (oWmmO OO OAAAAAAD ��mm
mrnrn(o(u< 0000 Nmrs�oDOUtut MW > C aD (O(OAA mm o(nmvaAo{v*�OOD
-IA ATTm C 77 O10DnVN i 'A (A 0 �
N Z �msp�_ 2� O T= 00 Am��00j
X m >n A Z m Dy 41,cnO KKK
V1XMMCCM
Xm (n1 O m O oo mommzzo
mozz�p
m 00 n m oo Z _
1 zz v$ x m o
z 0 m0 °' m o
nD m
o v 0 to
� T
DDD➢DDDDDDDp >➢aDDDDmmmDD�r(�DDD 00D pA DDDADDDD DySD>DDD>D »➢DDDDDDDDDD➢DDD
mmmmmmmmmmm- mm-��mmmmOG)O m77 G)]Om mpp J]m mmmrmmmmm
mmmmmWmQ7mmmZ WooZ707JmaommG)G)G)mmG�mmmOmOmmmnmmmoom mzZmmmmma�mmmW
OOOOOOOOOOOm oOmmmoOoommmOOm000or000000000 O Omm0000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
P Z0000000000000OOFcOOO00000000 000 000OFF00000000n0000000000o00o0
rmm m MMMMmm1mmJmmmmm [m
00000000000000
ZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
000000000000 000000000000000000000000000
CcMTCTnmTTccwM CTCCCTCCCTTTTTOMZ T TCTCTCCf/)mCTTCTTT TC 'nTTmT�(mm MXCMC
OOZZOZ-OZZOOwv OZOOOZOOOZZZZZmZ= ZZOZOZOWUVWZZOZZZ ZO ZZZZZZmZ ZOOZO
-i -iWO CCl7y➢MUC]11?= 1U) W11�wwwomomm ww New 7M wM mom w ww Cn(DCAwww Wn> 0
O (n N N N Z
m m 0
O ' m o O
G)
n D D
0 0
N
Nb
6
N_
m
O
M
O
a
m
3
CD
i
CI
b
1
Q
N
0
v
Of
m
cr
w
N
4D
W
u
n

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
V VVVV VVVV VVV V J VVV VV VVV VV VVV VV VVVV 14VVV-4 V VVV -4V-4 VV-4 V-4 VVV -4 VV VV VV V V VVV4Vp0V0Q0V
mC. mmO-mmOm C. WmWmcommm00. mI�OomWO0WW CDCCWCp�Pp0m� 0NCccopWO000CoO000C(o m co C.C.C. OD 00 00 00 0) W mOW CO ODO0OmWWW 00 m CO
m mm mmm mmm T O mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0mmmmmm mmm mm UOf Cna) 0,0m010) mm 0m mo m 01 m m m m Cl)Cn m m m Tm
O O+ O p+ p p p (] f o p O o 0 0+ 0 0 0 O p+ O p 0 0++ 0 0 0 o+ 0 0 O O p p O O O p W p O p O O p p O p O 0 0 p p O 0 0 0 p 0 0
O+ 0 0 0+ 0 1++ 0 0+ p p o O+ 0 0 0 o o O p+ p 0 0 0 p p 0+++ p o 0
m A V V W p A A A O V m T U U U V V m V J V+ N A+ V J V V+ V O O („) V V T O+ W 0 N V +(D + V W V V J V V V++ V A A 80 + V
U �D O-+rpm-+ N NAJ�pmVJJ +gyp (O+V V�p �p ID J(J�O,p,V J+mmm+� m-•VNV+V+JJ +mN JVJ++VmmNNNJ
A AsNA�A00Us+m V V00+-rVO++gyp ... O�pN+.+-.N+(�A�p O"Wm ppQ [OO+pV O Nip Cp+pONO�p CpONN+O�pp
m t0 Jom- COWmww W W-4, NUAm pCp-+A+App O�V1UAU+Am Wo, ."'t._.U�U �, m A 0)-4-�(IIUU VOOAmWO�A
m V++ '40 U A+ rD W+ A m W W 0 V+ U V p O O m m W+ p A+ V U V m N W W W W U U J W N m�O U N V m+ A O O A J W W 0 0 V W W V
O UANOrN WOpAmo001 N NVVU�DWNV oOpm+U7N��pWAVWWN0QV10u �O U00+ �+ N++QACpJWV1 A (O O1�D D7UW�pW
CO UNNm+UWAWOVV A OM WUUAUMWOiO 4Wpp OW U�OWAN+ 0O� UW UN coU comAmN++W QNm W CO A A W r00 J Wm
N Z p Z N 1 Z + p + p++ + p+ + O+ Z O O _ i Q O+ p++ d p+ p++ +d b +d d+
0�'OHO TA N �O O8688
V OoOp OoNoO0OHO N OWOW aW OoTONO0�O0OG
6m pN OO WN 00 00 _0 6U $0 _0
O WN pWOp0 OWpOU4 POPQPP
co "Co pp OOO+ WUONN
NnJUOVJW� WNWm �CO
A m O�OO ONO0�00J60NCO
Om ON O �+W 0jW+ JmaTmWNOmUJN WW NmWmZ� coWJ N Nf0 WJ W r0 m mm0 W
CD
(O OW mmA A UWCWW m� 12
X 0O AJ 0 NN O OW cam <O(.m W M VU W WO 0,mOU
Wco
-�
N
W>>z-WWV)NU)Wcom 0D00D1DD11mm>WAX>>mm<SS-i10� 1�m (�C)�nKKZZ =N"0N"xxmmor-im-i
Kmmn M+mmmOmmmm O�D.7000mmmmmmmmz-U-Umm�=>0dmmmm mmm 7D77DJT8mmOS�. Onna0mm�Wrm
grr�D�o37�o➢ago << m . mmDOZZ0000zSmmmX ELT-<-<OO�A 0D0 rrmmmmm�--m00zz00m000
-<o��O�om�oc�m�o00 �����o��Qo���r➢DoOo{MnnOOmO 00M cw mwwm`mm<KKmZZ0nKKm0�0
000>0000 DD➢D-i 00 Fww
r pn�c7ADvN
t7 mmmommDD O�002-42ZmmmmInZzz?0-JD9mCC0 0 DD mmmm0A A
00-l0-muozUomm vvmm o0v-l-Im M-1-10 U50 Vim A31zZ��3}37�mm mmm—�—
O�mEn(nU7U70U7U7Dn z--zz� �KOOMKDz-DVrrm-"iax=n0 zom mm00r-r-Dooca ��1D33 �m��-iimmm
v��nOXXX�XXmm mn�7oZz��nnZ �y��mmmcc WWmfOrilprST1 Amm Ir�mYDUOjZ cvi700 aa➢o 7000�
Z<zm mmp-n mZmmC70 ��00� W 3731� z m � V7 U7«yU) mm
Om{m ZZ �0 1C7�1om mmmm1.0.p i-iy ZZ� m O 70� y mm zz 0
c-ur- mm mE mommm mmzZOZ -o-n—A mmZ m 7� 00 D
U)Mr 3733 7 K 37 v mm➢D= mm 0) 3737
mOC7 00 zC iv-1-i0 DazzcGl >>Om ow 0 m Occ m
m0 i {� DZ 09�� Xo 600mo zz'
rC c0ZZ 0 Oa 02MM 0000mm $ rn
2 n-i mm37�mo �. 00 m
� r0 Ov00 W
m 00 0a 0 na m
• v Dp W co -e
W NNNNNNNNNNNN i + +0�++++WWWSSS SS+-`71CCSSSS SS=33S �77131 SJ 77 JJ JJ 7J 7J 773177 JJ J}77SSSSSS
CWCa' OfOW OfO0oWW-4J 0p OJJVm8O++AAJJN J+ 000000H-Amm000-F A
➢➢➢A➢➢A➢➢DADA A AADDADrADDDDD0WWW**nZM.TVTQ�TT �**m_CtCiCiCi-4C-7AAAAcWMM�mm0OWWWWWCamW _
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z z z z z m r r m m-- J J V n J C m A A A O+ A A A A A A m Q A A A_ W W W W W C
D ADDDDDDDADDD D ADDDDDmmm�Qmmmm {<vc0-NC-0mm <<<X OXXO OX XXm
0000000000000 0 000002DKMmmmmz 0(4amOZ2XM T52$0000000°'��g0 ++>ym W
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z O m>> m m{ -< � 0 X m m A X m m � X X X X X X JO A X
0000000000000 0 00000zmrr nn DD NNNN++ m m
DADDDADDDADAD D DDDADv mm00��r AUau)r=r-- {/�� =JJoomm o W
37373)37m�J]D 3)37�JJ 37 p m3)373)37n<DA 000 J rr 11 mO)(OD 00) [n
vOv000vvoovov 0 0U 00mmmm mmA nn W O
0 000 v0 OCzz _
Ommm O
m
W
n
m
m
m
0
n
n
aannnanannnna a nanannaaannnnnnnnnanannnnn0n ananCnnnnaannnaannnnanannn
�m�o��o�a�o���o�o�o�o � �o�o�o��o�o�0�0�7�o�o�oz�o�on�n�o37����o37nz�>J�om�oz�am�o�o�o�o37m�om�om�omm�omm�om�o
0000000000000 O 00000000000000000000000000-40 0000z000000000000000000000
313J 7tl 3)37�377�3]70 m3737 m mxx 377 xxDl7373737 Mali Dix 373731m 313)31373737 mom 37373�m 3737373737313)3J 31 ]]3137 ]73737373)31 ]73737
0000000000000 0 00000000000000000000000000mo 0000 000000000000000000000
zzzzzzzzzzzzz z zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzZzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
0000000000000 0 00000000000000000000070000000(70000000000000000000000000
�mzmrrmmmmzm37U7mom mzmmmmCzmcmmzzmmcmzmmcmmccwm-1TCmcmcmmCC5C-1mmCC7mT ccm
�eO yZCC0z�0bZ0w Ow v Z-ozzzzgTzozZv-vzZoz-o22 7zo�7oomo22omo2w22OWBO222OW200 woz
mv7�-4�cnin N'mW y=N= Omry7U7OW mrn�wwmmW0 wmU7U7JU)?��NyU7v,�0�cn��7N��m�V7U7(A��U7-i i ��0
�
1�m m n n N N mzz
m
C) G) LDi 0 N N G W mm
v C C C 00 ME
O O O
uJ N m m
r
u,
C,
A
0
'U
v
_o
N
0

H
JJJJJJJ JJJJvJJJJJJ--mJ-JJ-4-4-00 m4Jmp�OJ4p-4 JJJJJJJJJ JJ JJJJJJQ-44JJJJJJpJpppJJJJJJJJQJ4JJJJJJ
0 OD m 0 ODco coD 00 T 000 m Coco 00m0D 00o 0m coo OD OD Oo mO mO coo m m m R 00o SO 000 OOD OOo OWo co OD coo c* 00000 w coWSO
mW WP000000co 0 OR
0) 8co 0m W 0000D m OW 0 CO m OW0
00 CD OD DDmmm OD dD DDmmmmWmDOm
mmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmm mm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
(Dcn8C88c2 Nmc,__ ncncnc _a 1_c__c_cc__Nc__c_c__�c_____cncn
(D _ O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0_ O O p 0 0 0 O+ s O O p O p O O O O O O p O p p O O p O O p O p O O p 0 0 0 0 0
A O p 0_ O-�-�-�� O s 000 p O O O y O O O O O O O '' O C C O O O O �.p O O p O p O O O O O O
(D _ o V O W N W N m m m A V m A A V co O m V O m N p(,� O A N_ V N O N N V m V V N O W V V W W V V V W V O O V V
VNN�ANp mWOmmNm(OWA Do VA Wm_ 4Wm N�.A OW 0-,J j-+ V(71Ni N(D V....��AO_mJ _OD_.FJ (p_JNO 0WW,0
(DA W(pWm1D OO O NN m W mV NA V �(D�m�DNWO jdp pp (pN N(D N(p qD OAAp NN(D(D WNANN(DmWO;iV_OWOW.+..w
m_fD p)��_ AVNW�Nmw8W0Ww! -WWNmWm m(ON(� NNmD� Om mONVVc mND�(OVNNNAD�ODm-4 (p�NN�ONmm
V_VppWNA (D�NmWN(�m mfD Oop AfD_W WOONODN �(DNWAAODNA (D (D �m...A (D (D NOD(g� OWNNO�VCW(��1p WVWNOOW�Wmm
m cpil�m�N �VOWIVN A(VO CA tND m iIADWJ AO�NVAN (WJtW NWANA0010 COV NVNNCOnmtmJ (�" �V�10(ND�? WAOAfn OOmi (DNNm
m m N (D VooN m (D A N N A m N N AW 00
_ W Z= p_ Z_ W Z j 0— O W —0— O 0 0_ O ... p Z p_— 0_ p
0000 08000 f SO O N n 0 2 O n 0 WO n 0 O O 868 68668 O p Q 2 0 0 0 0 686 O
0800 MOO 0 0 0 00 0 0000,000 O 0 OaA O O O N O W O� 8 O 0 0 0 O N _0 0 028
O
m �mN NmmV(A AO V N0 W0' m Op0000o0 W m.m wm,4cWDm ����mO NOmDW cAn mA FD
N W-' ANNNV VV W NNN_W ON AN(D Nm y, mNODmN NOmLOAW NVO W
O m-• ON ODW N O
WA mN ADgm OD (D O (D m �(DV N AW m N
4 14 co N W O 0 N N m D NW V O
N00O m DV �V m m V W J w W mm O O
AD O�mW O0 m cr, N DCO cc V WCAW
:Emom00 ow--mmmmmm o-qoozz00 Kan��rrr m M<Kmzmmvom-KKmm-�vm„Kmmazrnzzcn
r;Mxmzz n_cy00M000000 <Mmrm_mm7➢x cr'1nxx0Oz X mr-0m>Ci0zzzO.0mm.101X D1nOVZ0-00-
O]7�7J7m07m0 zzOOvmiC�CminnCmi nOXXmm00 vzcOOmmO z <�C�z�o7T`mmmm---<-<OnnmaKaaK
Zm_m r S Z 1 7o_K-u-VSAC) zZ rr 7G rO�`*0o:E
m-azr� ����x z�� nODn�*>n ,a,M000> ,00 Opzvznnc�m0FF-i-iOrmmm-�mm00cjn0zai
vaTcci>0ad aDOc�mc�c�c�nm ��mmmmmm �zmna00m N m�mN�mmxx�rtlyZaavmmnZmm0mom 0
m�nm1mr. mxa'AZOOOOm mm ZQ 0 O K- c�c� mOm�O
zOD� CD mt�mx mmmmo ➢ O Z yyrmm0000-4O20mm
vb rrKcccc0 cnrn v� zmG�mmmm _
OCvmr Az7mmxzz z< �cOo 00 aemm--.< z > n r- ocozz zI?mOzzz00000
`> (D OODD �� �� anmT mm n��oo y W z G� z]P. aano{� �c n mn
M-MZ 0000 ��roGzi <x11 ODmcc Z O m 2 c OS < q cn
zO00tOi�VOi nn m m O m(Omm 1q� w9-v� { m 0 0 0= C00 z 9 z rz
ZOOS zz r -I-1 z �� O 2
mx 'Dn xOO m0 00 mm nn On (n Z m �r 22 D D n m UZ00 mFim x mm mm -11 P c m m r
Sz1Dm Nmm O 00 �z mm r m� 88 p D
➢ =_OD 07 < zrn n
O o o 00 z
O
-+(D0000N
avAD000
_NOJmvJVVV0�VV
dNNAm
0 N N N___2_0--I_001D1D_1_1
' NWNmmm
1
OOmOOW1E
'Dm
OO
'9O'LOmOVO'9 O'9O(NDO(ND-NmVDD
Wm
NiN-iNcNNAuiWnWnNmciWmWm
0WmOWmO
ZZ
0mm
�nna
ON0
0prNN_g
0000oz0000mmmm=mm0mo
mm
mmN
00
mN
mmmmmmmmmDmmmmm D>nD�-jDaDann
zzz
manvmmmO���0000==c�campDO
ic➢ZmXX��f(D
000
MMOXXXX
w
Xxmmml�Nnczasaan
mA:x>�O>OO000
0mmrrr1mmzOZZZxAn22SC��Zxmnv
CV�__
�
o j,,p--000Oc-r➢D�-4ZZ000000
0-2222nZ0000mGG22O0Z00000
Tm2�1�11
N�m���
nnn
<CaaC�Cm-y--
0D
ZZZ��D0n
QDmmp400
Q73
m
r,r-r,�SOSmommSS�S3�mm
oSoOz0000mm mx*70n➢n
OOOOmXNv
➢ 1
OOO m
O�
vN
���0000 c*w>0MMMx
2<mm
m yy
C
➢➢ -ir7i
CO
m
O m
mmammmn0 O0
OO
➢
cc
ZZ
m
OZ AA
U)
00
mm
11111-i-i 111 m m 11-1111111111111 11�-i-1--i 1-11 --11-1--{-1K-i- v--1--11111111111-i1111�1��1
a➢➢ana➢ ➢anamaaaaaaaaanaaaaa aaaaaaann nn >Dna>Dnaannnnnnnnnannnnnnn➢nn
70mm mmmm 7JSJ]--7727J]]7J3J707070JJ77707]70S mmmmxmmmm SD z�mxnm�oamaxn�ommm�o�oamxm�ox�ox�o�oxm
mmmmmmm mmmzZmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmm mm mmmnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmoommmw
0000000 00000 00000000000000 000000000 00 OOOm0000000000000000000000000
7J 277mSSD DSDG<3723J J1373131372317)7J27777 37777731MMMMM MM SSSr7]9 SSS9SS2 U7]77SSSSSSJ]SSJJSSS
0000000 000FF000000000000000 000000000 00 00OT0000000000000000000000000
mm m
r
0
0000000 00000000000000000000 000 C�C)C)C)C)0 zzzzzzzzz no nAnAnnA00nnAnOnnOnnn00C)nzzzzz
O0 C)0O�
mrmcmazomomcc5m
ZO
MC202NTy 0020W-Z
OM M =°'omm„ron
m �myN 002
C Y zz(On
1
C Lmm
c 00
m o rn rn
m m
0Zv
m co
mD mmr-mmcmmmQmnz C_almcmcwm>wmmcT
OD SOy�010D0o'p1OC) x 0101o'210'2010
W> l mw 0 0?m. x m >m m y= 2cn N
Z ti -1O7 z Na (n Z Ny Ny
3 0 cm 0 o' 0 0 0
M.CD n 10 m CD m
m m C0 7 c c c
Z 0 0 0
v (D
N N
CmCCmnCCmmco Mj!ZCmCX0 5xmz
wz0wzv5owzzmm0zz-uwzwKNKxm
0 o ov vo v v_ -Doc)
cn cn cnw 0r-Sv,m m m
U) m 7u m
z ➢ m
mC n r
O 0
21 0
z On
0
d
n
n
K
m
v
m
N_
m
0
O
Q.
OD
U)
O
O
O

El
m
W
N
mm N N N N "N N "N NNNNN N N N N
J J J J J J V V J J J J V J J J J JQJ J
N N
J J
N N N N N"
J-1-4I J
"""N"
J JJV
N N N
JVV
"N N N N
VJVJ-4
N N N N
VVVV
N N N "N N N N N N N N N N N N N
�1 V V V J V J �I J-4-4-4 V-J-4 V-4
WOWOOWOWw WWWWWW�WWmm�WWmWOWo
W m
p-44J
W�WWWW
QJp
WWOwww
W�Owo
mwwww
mmW�
mWmmWmWmmWWmmoWD
OWD �OwD
T m m T m m T m T T m m m m T m m m m m
m m
m mmm m m
m mmm m
m m 01
mmmmm
.0
T T
T T T T T T T
OwD
T T T T on T T m T T
O O O O O O O 0 0 0 o O
8
o o
8�C��s
O O 0 0 0
88888
0 0 0 0 0
��C
O O
88c8C
O O O
0 0 0—
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
p p p p p p p
p 0 O p O p 0 O O p O p
p
O p 0 0 0
-A-O
p
04p
p p
o p O 0
0 0
O o ��
O
0 0 0 8 0
O p p p W 0 0 p
U�V�U V(�.1V V(„� m1wT mCAO-4 !
NA m..OV�wJ�AmNW+�UUJ...0
U j
yV—V W VV
V.aVwV
UAAmA
yUfO�((J��
UIV�
Jr
UIV�V 8
QJVNJ�
:: 0p
((J��NV
�mOWUU
OODUOJAppm�N�-AOJ�
O�W..,�,y W Ww J...,
mAWOp40WA�Ww�O�AVWT4W
N
NNWOTN
UTAA
�N(p
WPON(p
VWWU
U(PWNWAwA
�pwVWUOpTVmw4)�w wmUNUW
Am�O)Op
O
WU(pJOw
WOmNw
WNAmU
OMO
NAJ
�D MOOO
AyaAJ
WWNT
OUO
NUNoto
WApNppp��O((��
m2w0oww0
Upp �O)�(pOwOWj
U�NN�UVIOWW
plO OpUOpOOim�s
�Aw0U10b
�(W71m
NAAWNAV
U(0m00�
ANAWwcOW�WOilWJ100DUW(N))N �yUJ
Nyi UV W O—A
W (WJI
V
OV�UOJO
OOWOA
m
WA
J �0
�W9 NWW
W
O+W Ww�O-+OOV
T VOw�W�V
Q y9 o =9Zy9 z-oo-o
N00 00 00000 006606
=oyzy
z z-
0 Oo
yo
86
-019
0000
oz
00
yzw:z
o0N00
--coo- -moo
0o600cmi 000
OOO ON 5',m N m0"y `SON
(nOOW
00000
O OQO
Q (%)O
O
(n
OWO
0
C)owsp :D
OOWN W 00�
NON W OOW��W
O���ps
cn op
0
O�(n
�A
Rwco"
N�"'WWV N�
VU
WwW wW wWOAW OJpOwW
NWN WN WAOWW oy w�W��
w0www
W(UO JW
m
00
WA
Em
wNWA
WTWW
TO
N'
w U
ON
wpw NWW
W(T NCO
U m t0 O)V m
tJO (p
WW
J DO
o
m
CW71 �0
W N�
S.
WW Jw
WO
V �N (1DO A
W N w U
T AN
w 0)0
N W
U (�Ow
0
w
w
�D w
co
A� N=
UO w0
(0o
m0 A n
i
(T w oW V0 N
m 0oWV
(4 m-+
m
10
V
m VWV
too NU
Qom 11>-4-40 ]2<m7KK(-ww
mmo DDpDDDDmpDDao--i-1
xX--immmmmDO-«Z O
mmm10
<<oDy
mmc)xm
1 -�
D �2
x Zm
rr
�D
rr��
yRoxx
�,7rm
COO
OOpzzwmO<TZ2wwm 1
RR>001DO�C0(�7 11aa
ZZm
ZZE mmxmmOOgz100O�o
mmmCOE
m n,
zr-
v -��
Zzm
zc)m
ZODmmC m7�Nrn("O(�
mm <TZ�--A «22
xxM ��p�pzzGaimazz,�ivtn
��0mz
m 0Z
zz
0 <
KG)A
DD�00= smoc2)omimWmm
OOmOOmOOanmoA--Omm
xxm00 i120� �' mm
mmr.Qcn
0 mm
1 mm
00
>>
oO
0(nmm
mmr.
vW0
mmova>m<K*D-mwWW
zc?m«�n¢n9�ommmmm
Dam OOmzZrlrlOmzzznKK
0000M,
x�omoppp
O
w(n- -A
0100
mcz
v-imAAMErr�zOrzmmaa
020mmmm
00� wwxmmV-a nf�G)zzz
x 2
°oomo
m m c
z >O
O m
�7m0
1�mm
O m m m
�Z�
D
Ob4DmmmwG>
m n 0 D a
TD m m
1 1 m 0 0: D n m O D n
22- rrOp
mm
moo j
CoCo
T ST
mtn-«
_ m
mZ
D x m O r
�oODCmiCmim m Kz<7J70rr
mmm ppzZrmFrr
88�T ;oo osnz
« p
z¢'mm1
OD
�zt
m-mpe
#pp�
Z(OC
�zn
O�om K 0 MDZmmrr
n mCz
rnv{i
x0cjmm Oxon OCR
22
0�2>
m
o D1
00
z0{��
0�` (mii(mn 1 X�
mmman mmm
m 0(/) 1av 80
30J�8
O m
v-zi Dm 0
rNr-m
m0
-0
O
Z
O
O 0O y
�1 Zo
1
Oo
m
o mm 0
m a
n
r
AA
8 8222AA
OVpVpVOVppVppAOAON�COEncilil-0000000
T W� m A O o w m y T
O
ZZZzW
O On6nOW
S 2 2<n
-+m8wm
CWA 0000
T
r{
mmm
a, Om
wVVUU
NOOC m JV
-�-�
i
�{
mm-�=MMMA_N_AA--
--� ?go
OA(p� oW��Va0A wm00
ONO p O W w
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 mmm 2 2
m
m 2-2--
2 T T
T T T
T T T T T
T
T T m M m z Q Q Q
mm
mM
rD�DDO
ZZG�
� na naa��na�oo���oo
a a nvovanammm00
r
r 0<a<<x
��mz
-0z<
Tx-ZZ
nZ
as
nZZZ71
'mama
n-
mZmm
C<�Zm�ZZXmoogQAAMT
mmm�i8 110zz0N
ACQQ p3 aanarr r 00000
nDDa0D>><<<< v111G)O
O
o
O ow-<W�a *
o O(p VAn
�or00
ZzZ
000
ZZZZZ
00404
Z 1
TD-Oi20n99a �lao0(nODT
�m-4 00 mmnmm>g
«< «<mmmMwmmmm mm
O
O M-4w -<
DOm--�-�
111
11111
y00
--�11
0 Noom9 nn>mmmm
1-i p fl0 ��
MCCmmCCmmm mm mm ��
0
i
0 1N�°Z
N11
(bo)'
m
m (m"m
�
mm mm mm
M
Wmn n
07 Ej
z
1
mm
m m z
1
O m
xm c
vo m
j m
x�
A
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
nnnnnnmm�nnnnnnnmm�a n a mmmmmm 'mmman mmm mmman mama mn'mmmnmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�mmmm � m mm37mmm 'mmmmm mmm mmmmm Ammm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm3)
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm m m mmmmmm mmmmm mmm mmmmm mmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
00000000000000000000 0 0 000000 00000 000 00000 0000 000ZO000000000000
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm m m mmmmmm mmmmm mmm mmmmm mmmm mmm<mmmmmmmmmmmmm
00000000000000000000 O O 000000 00000 Coo 00000 0000 000F0000000000000
r
m
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
00000000000000000000 0 0 000000 00000 000 00000 0000 00000000000000000
m Mr-mcmTrrT-Xmr- MMCCMCTMWMWMMCMOMMM-ummmmmmr-ommcmcwmcoc_ommx-mxzm6ccctzTmc
qqC2o-7J yipn2lo�-yio-N137o-yi OZp o.�o. 37p �C37po-�g90po2o-ylo m0lp�o�190o.S p0�p7JOp_<111�1n 0001
M x- 0 x0- 0- D0. . (1) 0 � x' x' x0 0002 x0x0,n 20- n 20 (0 'n 2 0 m S0� ODmOT m00
NNy 0" (/)m Cn q m NO MONO W O OO Np (iiy u+ Ny 0 Ny MC: p N Z
1 y 1 1 (/) �. (aa. �. Z (i c� 1 cps t��. Z = 0nz" 3 (n
N 1 � W W A� � N W(D W W T N LJ
n 0 �- a a m a 'm n n n n
c � c
0 w 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 m 0 1�
CD CD
r
z
0
z
O
R
m
CJ'
N_
n
0
n
(D
N
n
N
v
v
a
0

tD
O
A
W
W
A.
A.
00
W
y
v
a
C
v
N
V
v
N
N
v
N N N" M "N N N N "N N N N N N N WTI) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
J J J J J JJ JJ J J J J J JJ JJ J JJ JJ JJJ J J J JJ JJ J J JJ J JJ J J JppJOo J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J JppJ4p J JJ
m 00O W 00o 00D 00o 00o Comm Coo0W 00
voco 00co 0W 00o W OD 0m WW 00o 00
WO COM COMMOD Coco00
0o OWo00o W00o W00o m00o000 coo co W OD Oo W 00o W Co coo coo 0000o 00000 W 00o W 0000o 00D OD Oo 00o W OD
mmmrnmmCD OOmmmmmmm mmmmm a) 0) mmmmmmmm mmmmmmmma) ma)mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
+S2+++C+ +C+++++++ +8CC+ ++ CC++CC+s + C+C+C++ + v7CC+CC++++v)rn++(nC v)ry)Cn (n+C
o+000po op0000000 oopp0 0a 00000000 0000popoo 000+000000000++oo+p+++moo
O++++ p 0+ 4 0020 O 4 p 4 0 p p O p 0 0+ v 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0+++++ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
O JOWW�W W -J0 JV OtrO VI JpJ CttV j+V JW+C40 (T J+V+AWVJ cnmW WOJW+VW N0 WW Oc�OtO (n)V ..
�tDONN�W WNJOJp�JmOA WVOp-.J WV +OJW+VtO fJNJ+J+0 J_ NmJJ ODU+WV++VW000_tp+WNWVP+p� J+
N-40 W 0,2ONAVWOOD NAv'M MWLo AWWONAVAIW WN-4ON)NC0 WAV OJOOW Wm Jtt)OOV W+W JMM OW�AA(0D t71 p0j
AON JtD W A+AJWm JtOW 0"N000 �N VVO mV1 _WW OOONOp IONWJ Op0p m0)ON'OV0-'OmA(nW A0oN-4 -4
001W f0J t0J�lSWi+A t00WO0Ao l0DWCOT1 t011 C0+1 NAOAN OjWJ1 mANAWOOfJL W�Aw T M!2a CA71A �0++C07�OTWWW+�WV+O WfD [J CTTy
O O+ A WW AW WN 0 O 0-+CO O CR AWVOVV
Z -+ O+ + Z+ Z + 0 0+ + 0 0++ O O Z+ + O+ O O++ ++ N O O+ 0 0+ + + O W W + O
O O N o O D O O 000c,
' O O O O N O O O O D O O O O O w 0 0 0 0 A N N O w O 0 O O O t0)IV 0 0
O O OUOpp 10 CTN+ + Cn+s+C, N p((�� 028 W OOmOA+NW.� W N 0NA O
N A 0m AOA 0 O M 0 JNOOo�00A OwWw '^OO Oo Jm cnM 0+W 0o N N 0A
tl Oc" 00 N JtlOJ m -,j-4 wavpp to Noon 0w!4 Wm NOomWJO N 0 mm
AV w OmWpppp O OWO+WO+A tONNO JWA Wra 0)W O-4 W W W tO
fn) A N O 0 Oo N to cow W v) V W m O
W coVO +.n0 A j J W AOo V V N W(ll AA4 O V N W
t9 j + W t0 GP fD O O w 0 Vt N N C)) W W A O O m fT A V
m 00 V W J A m m Crt m W W tO t0 J N N fD 0 W J m N
OOrMzzwM v)::i ZZO O L-r--i0 T mor--l-iODD W[o22 0�0 cD0002�Z-MM T 00op
M G)xW-6w mZ poor- r- M=-O M MOZDDXMM -<-<zZ mom ZMWWZmmnDOrm-rmXmmmmzz _rm-➢-{1 -➢.-{{
ZcnZN+Ocn m0 w0C C DDm� g Koot: mm 0000 mDZ ND jtKOOcncn- mmDmmw_Z r-loo, ii
00
2o'T ccmat vc� C7 C)m m «O� m mmDQODDn cn Un-<-< Omz cwxx nmm000DD<9DDmZo MMO0
r0� Dw *O DD U)v)D D D 00
r DO r T T wm {N 000 0 COOOT (n w>ZMMzxtu 22DD D7J'- 0n�.j0mmZZ: OC)0000v-7c T. 7oOODD
OvOCDimm� mn0i �Wp y c�n�DO X XDCOKm�+ mm7o7] <m0 m02z0DDww,mm0 LiDD 1rtT1���
,K, C �m AA rr j j at➢O Z DDD m
zx�<mmg m oom m 7momXv O Omo MY— crnmyn) ,,O„� 4 0�450 0000m00zvvMO�mm0-n M
n n Cl) 0 to„OM D < ND Z z0� 0D MM 00
Oo X -xrco0 ZZ000>>� � DK7,0
N (n C-i m NNmmD m
� O o0 m 0 MM DO <C O�m(n mm Mo .Oo C`= m D0Mm p
LZ] m cc �a m� jz mm mZ -M r-r«<M-v _ ���D
xx O OO c<inD 2 Dm�D
➢ A0 Z
O O mm O 0 n O Z020 zz MM (n m Y,
00 rr,Z
0
nn 'Z >> 0 W
zz m m n
fArn �D
NNNNNNN NNNNNNNNN r2NN_ 8N8r� 8888888
NN + ++++++++r- +7� j4.4 n++ NNZccczwmo'^o—SS
(212(C2NN NNNNNNNNN 00 O008QQOO fTNCT UIm++O 0—AOO-iNNzzZOOnN��00O�• Aw4O
____ ODU "M 0" ++++0 00p0000 NNN++N++ OZ000 mOO N+Wm
+NO 0C) WWfOtOw mcn1NNA +-+-+OVOONOO wmwwww zz� M G)imm DC1)fn mmm++T S22YNOm+�C
zzzzz_z ZKKZKKzzz ZKKZz zK Kzzzzzzz ZKKzzz� D rcn;KMM>w(nXwXE **e*czzct"D➢
OgKgKD KDDEDnKgK E�YKO K➢ DK000000 KD>OKK m 000M��mmmOO « <<mc�Ov,zmm
000
9 anD➢Zy DZZDZZ>D> DZZDM DZ 25Mpm�m DZZ=D➢ZDO➢ _:L0(pLT0>>oo0CCN TO Av====2DD
YZZZZO2 Z�-Z-4�ZZZ Z-1�ZT 2� �Z ��TT Zoo2ZZLe) 00000co ������DWQ7➢ «
>'���13�]cn �MM-icnN-A-1� -0170' -�j� ��] p�����KK -w �u)(n �DDZ-iD of rn ZflZ31�N<«gym WfvO mm
1 mm m m m➢DDD� m D ]o Op Omcncn aD^)���zAwwAAzz
z mm 1mi mm mz zzzzzz Zm mmm oD�rzni����Yvv a➢U)C/) �g��mmm
cn �m my cncncncncncn 0m -1-4 OO�m od cncncnM; m; mm
1 1 00 ��-I-A-i-i-4-1 1'i A DZDx cn xx
DDDDD D O 0cnm-i OOrn <M --Im -A-1
mmmmm m ➢ -IM PKX4A Am D mm
M-4i��-4 m o D� mmm Acn zz
m zz i zz
m M O m
Oo Q. Q° Z Z
22D v)v)
T
N D D
N N
V D W W
{
YD>YD>� >33Y➢YD>> ➢DD➢D DD ➢DDnDDDD DDDDDDDD➢ ➢DD3D➢DDD➢DD➢m➢➢D➢YDD>➢D➢
DDDDDDD DDDDDDDDD DDDDD DD DDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDD-DDDDDDDDDDD
QoWW0W0om O000000Co0o0W Mwwww WW WWWWWWWW wMMw W07WWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWZWWWWWOOWWWWW
0000000 000000000 00000 00 000000v0 000000000 0000000000000m00000000000
mmmmmDD 2DDDDDmmm D70DDD MM mmmmmmmm xmmm 7mmmm DDDDDDDDDDDDD<DDDDDDDDDDD
0000000 000000000 00000 00 00000000 000000000 0000000000000F00000000000
r
m
0000000 0000CZ)CZ�C000 00000 00 000000000 000000000 000000000000 000000000000
OMZTMZ ccisn ^)pC mTnTQ(Did OT(cn TCn �1d 0�1Nc��1 �iC�n�lw m?1c T1C O�TT(n my �tT�NN �CcnyTNT� v =�Mwc0c-ZOTCC/i
MOD �v)o.D �pDpDp76DaDz0--I�mpDO..��vv��Daapo�v�p�oowp�-Aoo�1��1�0��� v �n O��0 wo Z01
nmv) �2' OS�ncnSn�zv) COSMo C6(0 r->0 v1- O x v)v)7=tnWr- In MOM m mm r mv)
3 N " N C H N o. N y N CCn y N C Aw N N C N Z0 9c�v)
0 60 o ? o m o o c tn�m o m Co o 0 CN-jC
5. -j 5. �. N �. �. v) �- V! �. a u1 �. M v) cn U)
0 2 0 20 2 m CC) 2 -4 m :I
c 0 0 0 c c _q c Rn c c
C o O) 0) o o o 0)) o O N
�1 0 0 r- c z r �
N 1
N_
13
m
O
v
d
A
Q
z
d
3
m
d
'O
`v
`v
N
.r
0

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ... N" N N N N N ... N N N N N N N N N N N
OJD m o m JJ o POD OODD CO Cu �J COJOJo OJo OJD W OJo OJD �J OJD �J OJo ppFpppp pppJppp OJD coV 00 Coco W OIJ Jo w w OVD OJo Co coo OJo OJO OJo W o oo �V OVD m OVo 0 OVD COJW oo oo Vm OJD OVo COJ00ODOODD m Ovo W mmJ W pmJp ppJpp m
mmmmOmia) mmmaa)immmmma)m QmimomRAmmmCDmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmQmimmm0) m mmmmmmm 00 co00
p O++ p 0 0 0 0 p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O O O p O p O N+ 0 0 0+ O+ p O O 1 p p O O p+ O p O p p O O p++ p O O O+ O O p O+ 0 0 0
O+000OOO OO+OOp +�+OO O2O2-; iG+ +2 cl: p< 00 OOp+OpOp p Op++00 OOO+pOpO++
m m(nWV V+V+AVV+NOON+ f� NV+V+mN m+p� VCn Op-4 -4(,� VV 00-40 V+ ((7��1V WO(TmWPCpAmm
+mNV+JV+J+fONV+-ENV+ A J+J+OYW mNCotm"Co0,040) JJ WJWV+ AJ+.(fp fD 00 AJ mOnjWpVm�
UpNWO)A++gyp NO 0) NfDO+wfp NO+f0Cf0 AfnWWN-++2 mN00+mfD wo +pDm Nm+fO (p fh+JN-+O 41 Np)0 mU> A+
CD Lny,+m O)AmmmmmNmmm mfltJm p�(� Jco O+W�p+p�M.Jf plCT m�D 0 NOON JfD m T N WNtO 0D 01 GD+ �O/A+mNmNA 00
mm N 1D ODmWAmm NtnOp OW0) + wm O�A"(l1m O(T WfD mA-+cp _. fJi (1110WWOW6iAW OD JaTmWJ+ W�WVN+pJU1J
w comN+(DJNmmO�V++NOA •-•�ONNVNA WCn V�OAOWNNWOp APmOWWWOVO O� W�VODVmm tOW00(nmO�JNA
J+mmU)m+AVNODWmAmm+fp CT [l)A +f!)p)V mAWm{p ID fpOJOrr NONmpD fpmNO+ W W �l NO)-' ONmVCo�V+AmV
O + + Z N + + O + + + O + O +_ O + O "Z + + _w.O Z Z
�O��dOOdO� O�O O� 00DO�O O�ppVpp OO 60 000 000� 0 OO C90 O 0o00 00
O J J 0 0 O O O O 0 0 O O O m OD C. O W O 0 0 0 O W O O O m 0 p O p o 0 0
mOVNm++m+(71 mW W..� UI CQ}m m m+ O N+m (T O m4 mOm4 0p
�A mmvvOmDN ppmm m0 mm�p mN �" N x mA oo mm� m�q0� m� oo� m wo-A VA
m w O fD JON+O) J 2 ON WN mml COO-40 N m+ N m fD VIOW N4
0CD COCDW Ln —Ln NNJ WA VW ID N O NJ Nm A O co N mW N
U, �O N y J CO JCO m fh VOz Nm (�fD O O m <D j0 fD mO
m O m w N _A m w AM0 023 AcD 0 m (nN m A AA
w m A m m A 10 OOpp fh W m w+ mm m O N fD Q7JJ N O -+
w V N m N W W m m t!) fO fD4 Nm m Ow m A w ca w N fD m mJ N A m
-+ O W N
0m(n0mmmxxm mmm-4-4zv
gxxxx zp>>>>mmp-Awwo-uac<D< ->EmmDD"0OmO000° 0mrmr
M
>Km>OvCKMC OM;>OR° »m000 rmmmm O>zzzvvyp>pO6)jn>> C 7Dmrrrrr70O
=13 nzp7OcnD0pZzZZzmmr-mr-Z11Z00 nzzzzZ���m°mvpvvCC x y«X =
mnnn0Om OmGGi
zTzOOpDze 000°Oa��Zmm00000OOmOPQm0000 mW>> m m<mowQ°
>O-paWOWmT�Cw�zzz--mmpOmmv 00!
ZOD. Wm0F1T-0>r cmmm mmZ.>DZO DmcKmm>z>z>acuzCmmmmr- Me- mmm mOmmmmr0000 mmCDQaWm00-40Mrr-- -TCroA mm
wwzz �Oc QDDDMOOOm<C0 mOOWmm vOmmmpmC�� O���mmymm rnZov0000q�mZm q�TrommTmZ2 N«-u cncnZWm Kv. nDN
a��Zmmpmpm0y Z
Dm�r,>m��>�zzzxn mm2 >>- m °c)G)
O3mmmmm i0u04oZoovr* 0 ozXDJm.DOyro V1mm Z °O mmmm nmC Omm 1 z DZZmm ZOZO22
Tcomomm a:Win m mm 111MK m m -4
O Zmmm-0O-4mz aD O x O 000
CGCDC 00 m �M�mm 12n2S O Ommm D >4-4
>
NS OO m OZv ;
w OO 1
mz0° zzz
-n o D>Or-00 zoo
T m nvt7
y-+roAAA ro'pA+SfA cnroroAN W=jjijW �'-+AAAAVN�7+»���D fO mthNAA W WWWWWWW �WWWWWWWNNN
a)m++O»oP• 00 0, NCC O OOOOWN 04+ OOONNOO A Ommowww 00040PO<D(Ow
OO 00 mNNmImmWO+-`°OO CD mSNNOOm�WVVVVONo 9���00(TD++OIJ)N NN A OOOOOOO +NN O O_O_O_O__O O_+_
00'2cmmmmmm vOOmwmOO z<<gmrzmr 1������zm0����� z ZZZZZz OmNZZZZZZZZ
moo mzcccccz8000000zzzz»>a)O>aaa» > >OK
rorrozQ>aDr-r-D>X5TO>mm F4CCCCC Oo00o 0 3tm> --I— Zzz ° >°O' >>n aCD°°MMKKK°
�F m• Apxrr xZJOOXmmm rACCCCC� ZZZZFxrrrrx M'm0 Z- m Dmm�DDZ Z=Z--I -i Dm
mmmwom -fni>==<�mNfAom�2 mAmmmmm Z����rZO11ii�m� yOiNi-Oi01-W•i ZZSZ(nNN -�-I 1��fn(nCnfnfn�
��m mmmmym� mm WW i c<c<� mOODOom7mmmm DXXDull>r mmmm �DD1��� Z »�����>
mm mmZ-- m r rvror O» mmxxxx�-I�m(n 1�1'1 Z zz co zzm z
mm-i-(CZZ 1 < mro m`m Ou OZZZZmmy -j (n VS In -4 (n(n� (n
-a--� m00 v >->. > SO,nGiOmm7olm x m� m mm DDD
00 xzmOm y�.vvvmmvmm m mm m (mmr� m
777D Omv�v Ommmm�� m-4 -ml M-1 -i -i
m<ro0 Tv mm
00 Om. vm =
zz m m� n
00 < O
r x
as m N
N
a a D z »> D> D> a D D D D D> » m m> D m m> D> D D D D a D D D D a m D D a D D D D> > > m m m D> m m a7DD D m D m> D>
mmmmm3lm mmmmmmmmmmm mm--mm--mmmmmmmmmmmmm-mmmm70mmm m mmmmmmm mm-mmmmmmmm
000000000000000000 0 0000000000000000 mmmzmmmmmmmm m mmmmmmm mmzmmmmmmmm
000a00000000000000 00<<00��0000000000000M00000000 0 0000000 00�00000000
�73J ]7 (nm J737m31mmm31m 31m 3}31 31m<�m=0�{mmmm37m mmmmm7737�mm37mmmm]3 m xxmmmmm mxm<mmJJ]]31mxm
OOOTO0000000000000 00rr00�50000000000000�00000000 O 0000000 00�00000000
m rr rr r r
m mm mm m m
m
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZ ZZzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzz Z ZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZ
000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 0 0000000 00000000000
L
_ r-tr--C7-nC TIC m']jm cm
00 �0-1— - Z 0-IO-1muj 0'�0
O. cW�rCmW (n H y O
ch�� o
cn
c c
c 0
CD
cD +
N
p
00
ZO�oZZ�ZmNm�Z�p��CZz
0-(_.N m v0"io� WZO 097 o Moo0
(n 7 Tww w mmm(nm m2�(n(n
u O O 0 Oy
z D
m w
> rm- 0 0
o (n O m
Z
0
W
v(ci�ZVZz�cZCZrcnrcnco�m, vz�cv�nd vZcnz(n0vn�
O .l omoor--io�v-ice-Ao mpvAm0y0 mC--4- �O
(mil (n(n(n(n� RCN D3. N �� N Ay N CO my nmZ�
O C ° .yi m O Zo m
ai � � D-' (cn n �-' � O
c -4 N c
r
c c
fn 1 � y
OT)
A
0
v
v
w'
n
z
ill
fl
N
9
n
0
fD
U)
0
41
3
7J
O
0
:.

N
co
J J JQ JO4o JQOJ40 J J J J J J V J-4-ppJ J J J Jp-ppJ J J
J J J-4-J J J J J+NI J J J J J J
JJ
J J J J J J J J J
J J J J J J J J J J J V V VJ
co OD OWO OO OWD
00 W co cc WW WW WW coo coo coo OO WW OD OD OWD OD OWDW
Q-4 W
W WW WWW OWoWWWOWO WWWOWoWOWoW
WW
WWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW �OWDW WW WWW
❑n 17TW OI OIW
a)mW 1nW W W a) 0) W (n Wm mm
W W Q)Ql WObW WO>O)Ol WQI Cl QiTO
mm
WommW W WOW
W W 01W W QlW O)W61W 0)W W W
O CNN NNNs��s����N�
pp 0
O 0 0
O O O s
VVNVNNAO7A
O 0 A 0 0 1 0 O m 0 w
N�OO�WNW�N[O O Co
N (JIA-4 -4 I�O)���A�V
NN
O p O O p
UNWVOVVWV
O p O p 0 0
UAWA�V<TWVAQf�ODW
j �cOVOAUC{O�VOWU�WAOOAdWNWcpr
O b1 �100UiOWiO
AmN M w v06Wi cW0 (V.INT1W0 cWO ppW
-4
A VV VtOV�A W_-�ODWO]WfDW
N NUtoJ�NWGWi fNii0 U00Wi OWiMLn U>i OVD
A-�
�0
WAO��I OpV_V �W
AVNWvAVAOVD
NO_61fT JA VVW... WfD
� m w WpWj A T � A 0 fWD(ONmWco
O�D
AUo 0 W
W N M
10 AV NSW N(01D A Octo� V
N Nc0 WQ1 FDA WWm 00-�-�A
AN
W�AONNO_vA
W_ M WO W VW_ODN(O pWW� W _OW0
OWiVWO(WAV�
(n W(Jo Wrn N N Co ODN pWj
V A tWO(O�I A N N� 10 N W(Ni1W 0 M N
0
WW
WW�W�T O�J
A010-4NDVWNWFI) 0NCWOo
0000
O
Z O =Z N O
C7 O 00
V�% W
tN
O co
OO
O—m--O—
0000WOD
O� O�Z-+ W-+
9000
WO0
WWO 00O 0A
0WO 0W 0NNW 0WW
OOfND
OO�1
Q
N ObOi
O co
m
O
W
O
W
00U OO
WW
OO
W0ONW
O
W WO
O cOO
rn N
O
W
c
co W coO
W OW
WO W0
N
NmVOV OO W
V W PO W
0
coo
co
m
W
V
V
N WWN
m 1n
V cn N
D. c0 V
cp cp ID
N V V
WAW01
W
V
N WO
W O W
AN
W
W A
N 2
A
W
V
W
O
V
N mN
co W W N
A f00 A
W O 01 co
O V A V N 0
W W U,A G1
W 10
OCMO
0
OOOaDDOna00monC
KKKPna>F
M
O
OOLn`raam
�ZONWOOoynCPr00
moKZ
0 W
]RWxMDDD(rn
T
o
ZZmmWW�
Om�]p
oom
00
m�
MWWfWni1WWT000
mmmWmnmoommmm 0
nnnpmmmm
0OOnnmm
77U rtmi f0i��vnd�
�T
mm
M7 ,T oo:PKK]P7P V-7
OOOmmmmm
m
m
➢
➢➢ 000
CCD(zi,n��mN���{m��
>>M00f 300-i-imK0o
M:E 1D
t7�
00(�pDmC)Z ZC)npyN
ovvmnaaw
UO
m
YADD{`*{' O
Zramm0mmccv�mm
mD�o
�mzm
��
MOO
Clm�nnn izim
mmm,00m JJD1mmm
-A--MAXAM
➢D8ZmmmZ
n
m
G�c»100C
mmmm7�z�
oiaQ��rr��7)
>OMKKMmmmmm
DMOO
z
7C7C7C— 7C �7c—(nUjW
xx mmm
�
0
XX_
Ommm�KK2zcn
1Za7o
zOoO
EW
00�— OrrZ
C�
nn�zr�eZi 0ocnn00
Wmrn�«��
aMn0lnan
O
O
000
zz(n
mmmWW:..mm000
v'ncrnnnczi-zizzzcWi
zOD
of
TKMmazK
0
D
mmm
inZ-4-A
O
��C<7m �-o 0
x0
T1-vmOO v
m
C
0
WSC
7mmommn
z «mm
K
v
O
00� L"ILny
(ynvpaOssD
(7
Ci
myPmm V WU*
NAB{OO
D
mm,
m1OZ
m D MY-4-4
m 0
n
N9L1O➢
00 SW
A
mv A
z rr
NO m
A
_
O
m
A�AAAAAA����-+���-+... W NNN������A AN NN������� ------µ----.-.---
OOW1 fDWCD fOOCD V7OWWA_A_AAA000 0�����000������cD OW W2884VWWA A000 VN�8OONN
N A a(n U O cT U U U N A O W W W O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U O_ 10 W oA pA ON NO WO W o + 0 0 o W V 0 0 0 V W 0
1M macn*mm.... �������� z znnnnnnnnnnpnna� �N cnrncnv�cncn� � **ooc�i>aic{i�zs«<o7 m
mmWMm�tn0Co--I cnW0co0co000)0 O Om70mmmmmmmmmmmmm 0> DDZZLI' m:Mcmm 0Cn-<-<111W00mmmzmo
(T(1LOmL 1(n (nDDDDLLLLLLLLLL Daaaaar-rrrrrrrZ Z1 ��1111-11D --l-i Mm DXpmmWZAxoo
�sssss
i1>0o�yMI
"KKKK➢n➢➢➢n➢n➢n m Orr(-Z anzzzzDn-i -4-4mn(nv�(nW0>>OXx7➢c
ZO(WMr,) M>>V)ycnU)mmmmmmmmmm Z Zmmmmm22mm22mmmn Dp Oo44DOZZy naWommm00��vxi4mm
zmNW 0mmNWW(nWWWoWWoWoW i �4mWW4o000000000m mm mzmmmm-A�K KK--i mmmfn040Dmoc
mL1» WOW�11m��i-�i�i-�i-Ni1� � 0000 v� v�� mm����Dam mmmm111c»o�o�o��>c7�
�n = Wcn m v1 rnCn cncDu)u)r.M cnvir�-4 z� �OXX
1m 11 ?m( 1 1� ��q-i�-10(n 1p 00 �m m0DO
co � --1 m mmmm-4� m mm 7] mp
1 4 mm1 i m m -A00x0 D
mm
70 11 v d
m 00
m
-A
DDD>DDDDDDD>DD➢D>DADDDD Dn➢YDD➢nn➢3>3 DD Dnn>D>➢D➢ D3>>➢>DDDD➢DY
3737D37 37703777777Jm317Jm7J970377J7Jmmm m 7Jmmmm777J3737mmmmmmm mm 70703777]777mmm 3170317J3i3137mmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmWmWWWWmmm W WmmmmmmmmmmmmWWW WW WWWWWWWWW WWWWWW WWWWWWWWW
000000000DD000000000000 O 0000000000000000 00 000000000 000000000000000
]73737703J 777fF 7o 7tlAaW]]D99m7]m7J9W2 2 mW7)7070707070W 2JS W7037W7] mm 7717W707 mxm 717 77W 77m WWW77WW77m 7]]]77
00000000000000000000000 o 0000000000000000 00 000000000 000000000000000
ZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZ zzzzz z ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZ ZzZzzzzzz ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
000000000 0000000 00000 0 0000000000000000 n0 000000000 000000000000000
?1�1 z1�m(n T1m DVf UI (n- y�WNWdilZCIAT(^7TTmTmT2?1379773721m?1NmT(AmmC�1C'�1'71C'11 CAm2mCjC �l rnC ?1 �7 �1Cr�1Z
(n(n(n Cnm(n,W>oWWr- Ulmnf/)0(1)AyfWT1�7272VZ7CZ/)�fZ/7 CZn������vV1 wmn.2V47�2210 � 00 CWnj2m(1) cnn NNf�J1 DfW/111f�nm
rA n C Z NN�N NN Nvi N Ny. n
m m o 0 0 00 o m
CD
O c <D mw
1 c c c c6 c
w o 0 0' om o
m m'
Q
Ii
m
v
m
N_
n
O
a
m
cn
C)
fv
3
m
1
1

N N N N N N N N N NIV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
V VVVVVVpVppp VpVpV pVp pJ�JpVp pVpJpJ�pJp pJp p9p pJpJJ JJJJJ VJJJVV pgppm VJ-1 JVVJJ�IV VJV�fV�IV ppVppV HMO,
pV� VpVpWV
W m[OOW[OO BOO WODW WOOD WWWWWWW WOOWWWWWWWOODW wwwwww ODW 0WW WWWWWWWWOOO OW OOO OW OOO OOOWOW WOO WW W WWW
-�OfWQ�T WOfOOfOOO)A061T OHO T 610010 M<DMMMM O)07 4m 0 Ji Q�Qimommc)MMommo m m mm
a)(1 m a) 0) 0)
1J8c888c cc-+ C mciC8 �c 88C CC ycmc�D�CC
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 p O 0 0 Q O O 0 Q 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 O p O O O O O O p O 0 0 0 0 0 p �.O O i O p O O O O 888
O Oo00000p0. O�oO� QOOO OOO OOv OOO OOo00 O OO OooOOO-+-+oo000OOp OOO oO
V �D V�90]tD fOVV 00 Z.
0)�vv'n, JOJJNA00�V MWwVwV 0 fhV� tTJ w(aVVOA-�V��p W(TOVV OVW ((�� UIVV
V000000�1—M (TVO��IOV�UtJ AJpNONNO NOON J�V (T WVN V,2VVVN�D fD-1 O�J N CD-4 A NMI
O Vl[D U1--`Ut (J1N apWW NAQ7�p 8U10MAA NODO p,p A[T pfO WQ��pNAN N NOp p4W�OOWTVNcp pWWNpWNA W(DO
(O M0)fJ O)AU vUlW WOIVm"("OlwOC/0)AVO�NANW tDANWVco AW V�DO A 0 Co N MMT WCRA p��A-4,0 1�A f0 OfON
WOW ow WW(pw OWWANOWpWA NWN�<D fJt cDW N� NU1W Op�OJ W(� NO�yf OW N tD�NNW.� W (DAW
O ANNNW AlTN00 k0(DWV7W00WWA0U7 nDN N VVO t00�AyW OA fD N..a �A�WA NfDOAVNcOWVJA�pAW� W N<D U1
W VN WADWW ArO coS V(l�O�gOyWW0010 W.�NV V�00 UAW �OrrA lD� WW�p NWwO��D fDAWNVwNODO00NO W W t0 WA0
======== O Z j Z j 0= = 9 Z= p= d = z 9= W O— OO — C O �� Z Q WW Z= p .i ce
00000000000 OOOO COoOQCO OoOQ -68o ,0 a o 0 866000 COO a0000000 oo
0000000pOUQ xQ O pNOQr'��O52 OON0 NO8O O O j OOW000 00p� V,a OONOOD, 00
v<D O C COMM M W O M A O O O V M NWpp �V1 GI O W 8 A N O�� W O J V_
00iWNOWD OD tpWpOpp��WTA OO O wo NN(p0000
O�pWOA='' NWOW WNWV 0 00 �w0rjwN OON ww NOAOVDO OOi ODD
Obi OWDOONANv WA O 0 W 07m A VW 010
A ca Im '� A� 00DV M, co OW OV N �DWN O OttODW 0ul J W Ul A �D� w a)Ul V 0 N W
4 AW0VW �"D VW �W V V MV fJi cpW W V W W 0 —0W krw 0 OD AW
av=n=mmmxoo 2xna KK000000immmm paaan n Ka mmmm�F >** oz Dmmxmm mD
Soa0>7zzx zi��� �Dmm OOmmmmmomm>> acoMo coin m O� zzZZOU7 aW>>oi�'mmmmo—M xm
22 �-100000�mmxx v00 0 Ov mmmm�n ommmomOaa-imc- z0
O�m�mZZzOzmm yrmn00 ��00000 �v� 1 33xOaOzaO D rm ««�� �mm�7m0���Dn�G)L� m0
m2xCOx-4-4O(�ZZ mm�� 22������ as x 0 '� O r<<< mmm n
nmU)D=mOOS2xx �tm mmmmm>00 ODD � $Z rrrr�� m4-<m5zoww 00 OD
=O0 aizzmm « CC¢Q rOOrmmmmmx�� v00 mmm Dm co v� mmmmZC 0DDMo>-ccr00 me
OO m�mmxx=0 m0vv mmaDDO00nn azz SO mmOOpv mmm�-vo��z« 00
rmm[�z-zi�r-rmm« {{°�Z rtr]Rri �A��0ooa7 -4- O 'Pm rKnKE[i n< o==MdoZDam Dm
p=Om7mmgmmO GeSioDO OOzzzZZQCc inn z �z Z�Wwo w==mOWOZam ��
oorr DD57O 00000--<Xx y�1 DW DD00— m zZ �� ZM
0 (8�nfl00mm mw<D mm�oo: �.7T- m« m0 xx z c� o D
02 p°mvr000 00 < mm-< 00�� -um OC «��0 0 a vm
T xxDarr 00 Zzm��00c00 =p0r. Q' xrt, mv�mm0 c y
c�[�zzvv22 <<� m��-A-4 Zvv O< ii220 Oa
(no) mm 00 ZZOKKmm ax G)G� > pp00
00 c�c� nc�mm 0cci o 8000�
0- Nx rrrrm m
mm v v X
]'] WWWC7
ow
cn NcnAAANNNNNNNN����
00 00 000 O00 5000000C
O�WVJJJ
Q N000
n N
2t1
�----
OwwNNNCcD C0O
z0
wWV
W—�WDHO4+.
DOS
MOO
0jA��AA�w0w0O0»Dx-Dx�
VDD
rr
7D(D00WOfDW
mmmmmg
�NN
�mwm
*moxxbmmm
mMm
O1
1—
*,rEOFmmFmm
�W0�
0�1�01M:g �wy)0
mEn
-1-44-1-i
-1
wow
zz 0000000
wwzz> 0000
zmx
o **mm
000zZW��Z:��crn�crncrn00
-Amxmmmm
mm
m�-A
mmcn-i-icc� Zmmmmmmmmmxx
O
i
mnm
n zz
o
zzz ZrrCA�r�000Zz
-4�
2Zzzzz
r
az
z
aAA
ZZZ
a1�zZ��C 1�1111m1NIDG�L�
zxx mm�
mxx
70
0
1mM
cnn
00�W
mm�mmrz7zzww
�-l-Amm-i00
NO0000
mm
mmm
xx xx' x
mmm--i-im w mm mm m ���
ma
D m
D ZZ
co
Zzo o0cnl.
m ZZ ZZZ z��m
qq
O�ccCC
avmmmm
G<
v0
-0r
v�o
C-i-]]Dmm -i mm mm m DD
-+-+ �1 -i «
v mm
��Ttyli
CmL.
m
�� m
a a
0
O m
vv xx -i
00 mm x
m
««
D>DD
m
<
D
--1 -1
mmm
mom
m
-i
m mm
00 ��
xxxx
vvoo
xv
mw
m
o
m:,j
U
x
zm
0
op
y
WV
W
0-4
Z
Dana aanaaaanannbananna nnnnnn na an> ana>nananDaaannanpaa a aan
aaaa aAxaxxxxxxxxxaoxxxx xxxxxa as aaa x xxx
i11-ii=1-l=ifD�OOW [oID0oW0oCOID0000WmW00[O��o000D m00mmmm Ww mmm OOQ707COII70oCo0ofloWCOW00[AW[aW W00 W Mm
DDnnnna0000 000000000000000000 000000 00 000 00000000000000000<00 O Oo0
xxaa xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxx�oax xx mxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xx x xxx
mmmmmmm0000 000000000000000000 000000 00 000 00000000000000000�00 O 000
xxxxxxx
mcncnmwwo c:
Z
zzzzzzzzzzz ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzz zZ ZZZ zzzzzzzzzzZzzzZzZzzz z zzz
00000000000 000000000000000000 000000 00 000 00000000000000000000 O 000
�+�+��+�a±+mca*+mmxTcmmmc�mcTcc?+xcTu�mrcarmcnmcmm�+cmmTccmmxm��crr�amcxmcmmmmmm
ZZZZZZZZmOZW OOZOZOZO>ZwzoV zoozW vcmzczw Omw OZma OzWO220vZZmcczo2wozmm Oy OZZ
vvovvvvvxvoxxvvxv�vv�v��vxlvobWlv(nvo.x`ioxv`+oxo��ooaxvv���v�oiav�oxoaov
mmmmmmmm Dm3 xnm mein mm m mD m= 2 co Na 2 5 Sm On Sm ww: Show w m D,w Mom 2mm
() NNn f/1 Z N N C O N 1 Vl Nrh z c 0 NNNN
m om 0 O o m a o 0 00 m m 0 0
o w� w w w w �w 0 w
C C C C F _ h 5 C
0 a 0 0 0 0 U)mm 0 0
CD �'m
N N
LM
N_
m
v
v
N
n
z
m
3
N
0
m
a
N
IN

J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J v J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J V
CWD CWOTCWD CWDCWD CWD CWO CWDCWOC22 MCWD 222 b212M 2cWO 2 MT(WO 222(WO 222(WO 212222 222221222222fE 22222212 b132213213 "O"C
W Wmcn (n Ccn yCn L/�j1yC�1i.•..•fn<pC..�-•�-•C(AC VlC �1l�(/r1CC--C-.•C-`f�C/7--CCU.-•..•C..•-CC..•.��CCC�-'CCCC�
�p� O�s000p0000-.A000000�0-.p0--+OppOOpO OpO-.--.Op 0000000ppO000000p 00000
p y O s O p 0 0 0 0 N p O O. O p p p 0 _. O p p 0 O O 0 0 0
W WWONrV O(nW VCAV�V�fV VW[n� VVW VWOWNW VONV��V V� V U�,,�VNmV��OmV�V V�{,�V V VW��rn 4-11
A�ACnw ACO WVAUOWAV V AWp(TVWm�OfUW�VOfW Vp ACAVAV C�Cr vWCDVAA WR(ApVV�pVVm�ppQlVp p�V
m N(ONWW� mOm0 mC0 C,,�O���mVWCD�OCpANWWAiNW �fJW�DOWNWMOWWO�,,��,,�jW<DWO��OCN10AWWUiW�.jW QUO
W NWW WCA W CnW M2 VOAmW W NM UAAACr WN V0 0W AppW mA WU VNAW [AW AA UW W W C. UmmOm V V VCAW
(OUWA-NNW VNCDACD 0 M NvmNN 40W WulMM c Q�U1CpN V.r�OIDNO OODWNWWUNANU�CO fD�ATU07UOVNAVVVOm
W UWWp)� Op NN NID N ACDWN AWWA AWM mCD NCpU��� VUA (TNNA�OCDWUWNNCA Umm WW"�ACOWUUOOVU
OUCDUWU-� OA�VWCOAmV��N CnUON WOWUIDACON VWONNi AVCn�pCNUWVVC7v�NCpsOm(]IN LnLn wNCOW
O _O- --+-+ O__ _O O O-+ O� m�00Z00-+-+-�000-+-+0000�
N O p O N 0 0 0 0 N O O O N C O O O N N O O N O N O J O O p 0 0 0 N O 0 O N O 0 0 N N O N N N 0 0
N p 0 1 1 N .y U N N N s O W W �Cp p N W N 1 1 0 N A p 0 0 0 0
M V W O W W W W W W W V N W W N N W W W W W W W V A W(h W N W W N O) W W W V V V W V U U O W
A W O AUVVOI NUV UA N lnW jAAUOJNW ?O UNNWODU0I VW AQp UtONUWV�fn UNW
N U NO-�((J.] tD W N W W A j W V N� W WO ON W� V NW W(nW NO__OW TfO V� W NW
t0 V WA AQf WC,nA + j NU 0I w W WO+ (Cnn
A fn W WC C AOD W N COW W N W -4 -- A� N WtD N W N
s Mm VWON VV (n O O WW T A ONO QlA OUP VO
N T O co V s ON) W W U W U U W A A V s W A V W U A W
gmzmmmo
20DO000
U z z r z
zxOr-r, Rop
mO200Cnr
mwnwwoo
wM>KKZD
Dziicn-'
DO5mmom
MMMM02
09mmma i
D3Wm
�rrvmm<r
mm O
?0 m
zn <
m<
2
--A—T—ZW
NVOCDCO• W
WONUUfiV
NML-n4�t�xC
ZzZWWN
ZW-4 DOC,
moZ OCo
DODO mz
mm0 M
DO
v�
0 0 0 * *,L- C_ X X WL- C_ **w>MTgv7-zzMM -*oMpw
ZZ���(Knm�Zn7COO 110��cmis0 �7Co**-i��. z no
OOnxz�ND�m�0 zzxr22n-,*z22 oM jEOK"
oommm>> M{➢0 MM-X>>DOocw> ffi mz-'m0o000
DD WW 0 ZW wwwr-MM r12 Cn2XmDTZZ
0020zz00CZn0<-= ZZZ: -pZc0�--1 r— 0 09�
9000OXAD*L OOD_ mPnOau n DOO9cnm
mm OOUcnDOy OOxZ DOrT-`vas m Cnfn>zz
cncnT!r.r8,0 � . . {D �- W W
mmnmmOcoo< COO jK0y 1 rnx
oozzzmmmr- nOt< mr 0 A �'KK
00 zZ {0cn 0 vim Dz m K MM
00 �m z2 co Z ��
m M 0 {
WWWCCCCzWW1VVmvmVUU M X=—WOWWx22222
40OV1CnCn�C%0c`',j�!(A000mV1UOmow" L�G%G)L3
ww-mmm0m0ozMOOOomoomaaz0czi
o,bnnna
{{{{
p� y V V W cDn 0 0{{ A W W" W
����
wwzwWW{Ax2ipam=U{<C<C1 mwW �W
000.
_oozopo0WjDDZ 22 O W
z� zzq.- { �� D
CDO00
� a
skOw(1
MM>Z_J _<� O
2200
22i-qU(nm oo
xxN
XX
CD CD
icn MU)
00
A A
M
-MMM
xgooDD-4mmmWz*g22-4mm0c-KZZOKK
`..ZZzOmmmDDOOwmmCCmDDOMMxz.Z-m
M,wommmmmZz=00rr•77��DOmU��cnmCG
mG�oozTz00rrOG)000Zcncmnmmcn rr-i22D x
cmn-4�1�0ZZ<<=000000xx=moaa�0gg
00C. - MOO ZZOmmtznwMo0m�OMlMK MT
Mac { j{-A-Ar wcn-<MMMG)vZi 7m0�v�i {
m00
mm 00 == 00 {{ODOOammn
No 00 r-rOwm0MM
K X{ZZZ
m m oan
j K
mmcn
Z m
222W WS7J 3123117223}DO 7J 1717 J73]J717233372 =1212
O0(�V VOO� ��-NA ��OOOOOOOOOOO-{�
xxxC2-4jNWWWWW j-1-4j-1j-1-4jxC-1WWWW
D>DO�mmp°OOOOOmmmmmmmmmDmm0000
{{{W NN O X X X X X N N N N N N N N N{�_`xxxx
www�2WWXNN—y WWWWWZZ-+WWVVNN
oop �m �No, NTto OOOOmm A NNAA
zDD�UN N-+�AXXXXX A0p VV
Z O{ln Cn�OOW NN�� 'MM M 702
AOmR1O AACWD CWO CUT U Cn �i DODO
�A2 DD Dorm
OOO KK
z00 00
Kr
cc:
�z� zA
o xx2xxzx zxzz2xxzzz Szxxxx�p�xxxx-xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx-xxxxxx--xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> i-1> -i _>1=i=iiCi31-= ii11i11CnUD111>>>>>>>>>> >>>>11>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>-�>>>>
;K DT. DT. DT. 7DC DT. x x DT. DT. x x x x x x x x x x x 7 x x z z N 7DC 7DC DT. 7nC DT. DT. 7DC 7nC 7DG 7DC 7DG DT. 7Dc T. 7Dc 7➢c DT. 7Dc 7Dc DT. 7nC 7DC 7Dc DT. 7nC 7pC 7DC DT. 7nC 7DC 7DC 7DC 7DC DT. T. 7Dc DT. 7DC
mmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm �mmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
q� DODODODODODODO DODODODODODODODODODODODODODODODODO ODOaa7oDOaoDODOaoDOADODOao WDOAWAWWA7D777070ADAADOAAAAA70AAADOAA
W CnCnUfnOU(n V1tnUfnUNNUCpUNN(AyCnCAU ZfnUW(n(nfnCANyCOWCnCn NNrn(n(nWCnInWCnNCA��(nCnCn WWCn(n(n(n(n(nCpcnfnW
O
I
ZzzzzZz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzzzzzzzZzzzzz zzzzzzzzZzZzzzzzzzzzZzzzzzzzz
lb-
o000000 000000000000000000n00000000000noo 00000000000000000000000000000
Z3
c
m
zzz CZ�5 z TTCMTTTzmCTT-TC C Tr TCCTTCTCnmCT RMccMMMcMMccMMMcccMMccccM
mvm �Oy5 O 00�00000Z�N0�0w VDU D�wDOwOp'AwO 00wwo000000w000w0w00wwww0
Chow uM T N ow UcnUUNU wo 0 rU-A (n UCn U� 2 Cn W DUU UN woo UCn N
O Z C NN z
V 0 C� 3
� C ili N
ru DO Co M O 1 c
CDa S
N
r
-. O
V
d
A
0
Iz

l�]
AT
v v v
V v v v J V J v v
V v v v J V V V V
v v v V V
mmm
(lO(WO(WD (WO (0D (�D (mO(WO m
m(WO c�D E LCo 0O N(pD m T
(WO (dO m IWD a"D
oho
00000�o��
ooCOOT000
z00000+- --�
8oCC8
—0000
m�A
(TAONNpVWW
(n J �co Vw0AA
G. �WV
O�AV
W VD»OAV AA
(TV AW V A0(VQ
W OO
NVNV�AAOV
W
ONDWO
W(D
TODAWp
'WOmm
JO 11141-0
AWNdpA
NVAJ(D0mM
JJ0
1046V000Df
TpWV
OTWNWWONOAMTPAO
—CD
O O
00 m O
—0--
8688 O
1p
0000
0W
A0
00 (P O
WA
OQOO_ P
PWmP
VDM8
N0
< W
0)
j
OOVNOD ONO
W(oy
OOANo
0
�j0aa
tWD O coA
OV A
W co
co O N W
[O t0
NO
U)
D7
CO 00
�N
C. N
xc�g
(n(n()(namDm
(n(n(nK2K
«g�
�02
mmmmmFDM0
➢gg➢Dp
z
oo.
0(naeD
won
00000M02
M ��zz
vino
71 M
OmOM (nom
DAF(��m
=xmo
0
m �[n
DmDm0C)o0
-qmmDr:0
w(n<m
<gz
mmmmm>00
`immmr_�
r,�m-
00
�z�i�-zi��
=mmom
zzIm
rnz
��
zzz-.qO>M<
�zzZ�
cn(n
D
�o mnOTm
znnm
``- m
mm =r-:n>m
Mmo
mm
mn zrn2�
{{r
Z
➢2 omDK
(nCn-<
n
Z r-wK
C��
000
2
=O
�L
o�
p
0
y{ n
rr
D
O i(]1 �000OOJV(J1N (DONNA m(ONN _WWOW
��VW(Dm to NOdVO)A�Z *ZZzz
0Z(n VIW WWWWVIN ��ll
moo
0700 zananann- —� mmax v��AAp
is= 7i 1 a ia� Zi�zln50Fy acnv�
m(ntn(n( wom � 20oIr- m(4m00
e`�* 000000 o 00000�com z
222 -.Zzzzzz-m MMMM 0➢O mmxx
mmm �mmmmmmOm mmmm�=20o �--4 "{PP
mmmmmm x xxxx0D0(n ��
q�� 000000 0 0000--imo�-A
mmm
mm-n-naT O 0000mr
mmnDmODm0mm O 00O
izKKK00000
00000 0 0000
0 0 000
222 22222222= 222222�22 22222
111 1 1 11 1 15111 1> 1 1 1
DDD DDDDDDDDD DOODAD➢DD DDDDD
xxx xx7xxxx7x xxxxxxrxx xxxxx
mmm mmmmmmmmm mmmmmmnmm mmmmm
m TT(no(n (nm(n(n(nw(nwo (n(n(n(n(no (n(n (nw(n(no
zzz zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz zzzzz
000 000000000 000000000 00000
cc6TMxbxocmzzommcmmzmmm(nmmccm
ln(n-w 0(�-�(nnZaaw OZ(nZZaZOOp� Oyta(ny
x3zy�a_[�n mmmo=Vwi�oomVQi==a=wm
O N N 0 Z 1 (n cn y N (n N N N N
Z O m m � j O O_ D
m wO w w w
m ➢ D on D
O c c m m c
(n o 0 w m o
-n mm
Z U7 M
P
N
9-3
v
m
v
l<
v
m
0
m
N
a
CL
m 0
N CD
fR
n
d
7
CD
0
d
v
v
v
H
n
4G
nQi
m
(A
O)
N

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 08/0512016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10105/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 93
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 93
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04117/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4830486.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/0512016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 93
Federal CERCLIS list
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 10/1012016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 78
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/0612017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC4830486.2s Page GR-2

---
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; It only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 10/10/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 78
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator oftsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09128/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Federal RCRA generators list
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12128/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC4830486.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators
(CESOGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 05/09/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 93
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 05/09/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/O1/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 93
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4830486.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2016
Number of Days to Update: 43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/0512011 Last EDR Contact: 10/31 /2016
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 0810812016 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/0512016 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 03/17/2016 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/18/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2016
Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
OLL Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 03/27/2015 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/3012015 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4830486.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal leaking storage lank lists
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2016 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10105/2016 Last EDR Contact: 11 /09/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2016 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/0512016 Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact:10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 10/13/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 118
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02l18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/2812016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 02/25/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/2812016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
TC4830486.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING J
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 112
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 12/1112015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 105
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/2812016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 10/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 67
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/07/2016 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2017
Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/1212010
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 1Oil 1/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
TC4830486.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07129/2016 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10105/2016 Last EDR Contact: 11109/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 02/1012016 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/2312016
Number of Days to Update: 73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/03/2017
Data Release Frequency: Seml-Annually
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/1812016
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10128/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 02125/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0412712016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 01/26/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02105/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 119
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 12/03/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02104/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Seml-Annually
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
TC4830486.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED (DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11113/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 1012812016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10128/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 67
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: M06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal Institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2016 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/2712017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/2712015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02118/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4830486.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2016 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2016
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2016
Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 56
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 09/20/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 51
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12120/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/03/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
Local Lists of Landfill /Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/04/2016 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/08/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2016
Number of Days to Update: 58 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4830486.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/1312007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01 /12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05107/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/1712004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 08/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4830486.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 17
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0311312017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014
Number of Days to Update: 37
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 06/27/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06128/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12128/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/1012017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 09/09/2016 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03127/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2006 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
TC4830486.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/0312013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/0612013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 0611412001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: NIA
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/1012017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12108/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 339
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017
Data Release Frequency: NIA
TC4830486.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011
Number of Days to Update: 54
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07112/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12131/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/03/2017
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TC4830486.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 133
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 08/01 /2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/2212016
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4830486.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 127
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 0511112009 Last EDR Contact: 11/1712016
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)1TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MILTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency.
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 43
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC4830486.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/0612016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/2012017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
Date of Government Version: 10/03/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10105/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of F1FRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
TC4830486.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact:12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 07/31 /2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 03/31 /2016 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2016 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 09123/2016 Last EDR Contact: 01/0912017
Number of Days to Update: 53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LOG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2015
Number of Days to Update: 218
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31 /2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/1412015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 59
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
TC4830486.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 146
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 148
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931 and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 88
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2016 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09123/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
TC4830486.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED! DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and ADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 07/15/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 65
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 67
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/2012017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2015 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/18/2016 Last EDR Contact: 11129/2016
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
TC4830486.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED! DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2016 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2016
Number of Days to Update: 71 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/03/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2016 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08110/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016 Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2016
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2016 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10105/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Number of Days to Update: 19 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2016 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02119/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2016 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC4830486.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/0912016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 09/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09120/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 31
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04103/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 08/22/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 59
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Last EDR Contact: NIA
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4830486.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: NIA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: NIA
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
TC4830486.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 'Last EDR Contact:11/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09129/2016 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2017 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Number of Days to Update: 96 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2016 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2017 Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2016 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2017
Number of Days to Update: 123 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05101/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Last EDR Contact: 11/2112016
Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
W1 MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information_
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/1412016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: PennWell Corporation
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map Includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant
its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
T04830486.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone:[phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and 03 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
TC4830486.2s Page OR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC4830486.2s Page GR-26

GEOCHECK©- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
CCX SITE
9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW
TARBORO, NC 27886
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
35.9976 - 35' 59' 51.36"
Longitude (West):
77.606541 - 77' 36' 23.55"
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
Zone 18
UTM X (Meters):
265040.7
UTM Y (Meters):
3986624.2
Elevation:
59 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map: 5945661 TARBORO, NC
Version Date: 2013
Northeast Map: 5946137 DRAUGHN, NC
Version Date: 2013
Southwest Map:
5944948 HARTSEASE, NC
Version Date:
2013
Northwest Map:
5945861 WHITAKERS, NC
Version Date:
2013
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC4830486.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECIO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General SSW
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
N'
North I South
TP
0
W. - . - . - . - - _ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ .
West
TP
Target Property Elevation: 59 ft.
East
1 /2 1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC4830486.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK-' - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
3720481200K
Additional Panels in search area:
3720480200K
3720480100K
3720481100K
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
TARBORO
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW k
Search Radius- 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC4836486.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECIO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Tertiary
Series: Miocene
Code: Tm (decoded above as Era, System 8 Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
TC4830486.2s Page A-4

SSURGO SOIL MAP - 4830486.2s
* Target Property
SSURGO Soil
Water
Q II� IR EVlfdn
SITE NAME: CCX Site CLIENT: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
ADDRESS: 9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW CONTACT: Vidd Garlington
TARBORO NC 27886 INQUIRY #: 4830486.2s
LAVLONG: 35.9976177.606541 DATE: January 18, 2017 10:55 am
CONTI M©2017EDR,Inc.C2015TWonnUr 2015

GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: Tarboro
Soil Surface Texture: loamy sand
Hydrologic Group: Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained to
excessively drained sands and gravels.
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat excessively drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro misec
(pH)
1
0 inches
9 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 42
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2
9 inches
48 inches
sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 141
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clean Sands,
passing No.
Poorly graded
200), Fine
sand.
Sand.
COARSE -GRAINED
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Clayey sand.
3
48 inches
98 inches
gravelly sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 141
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clean Sands,
passing No.
Poorly graded
200), Fine
sand.
Sand.
COARSE -GRAINED
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Clayey sand.
TC4830486.2s Page A-6

GEOCHEM' - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Sol] Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Roanoke
loam
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
Boundary
Classification
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
2
7 inches
14 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 1.4
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Clayey
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3
14 inches
53 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.42
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Clayey
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
4
53 inches
68 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.42
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Clayey
50%), silt.
Soils.
TC4830486.2s Page A-7

GEOCHECK''' - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name: Altavista
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 46 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
7 inches
14 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
14 inches
42 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No,
limit less than
200), Clayey
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
4
42 inches
59 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC4830486.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name: Dogue
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 69 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
fine sandy loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2
7 inches
50 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 1.4
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Clayey
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3
81 inches
74 inches
sandy IDam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Soil Drainage Class:
Ballahack
fine sandy loam
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Very poorly drained
TC4830486.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECK@ - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
35 inches
fine sandy loam
Not reported
Not reported
Max: 42
Max: 5.5
Min:14
Min:3.5
2
35 inches
55 inches
Not reported
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Min:4
Min:3.5
3
55 inches
70 inchesi
Not reported
i
Not reported
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
Min:4
Min:4.5
Soil Map ID: 6
Soil Component Name: Conetoe
Soil Surface Texture: loamy sand
Hydrologic Group: Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained to
excessively drained sands and gravels.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 42
3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
TC4830486.2s Page A-10

GEOCHECK© - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
2
7 inches
25 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 42
3.6
pet. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
3
25 inches
40 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
3.6
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
40 inches
48 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
5
48 inches
89 inches
sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 42
3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
LOCAL ! REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database 1.000
TC4830486.2s Page A-11

GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL HERITAGE ELEMENT OCCURRENCES
ID Class
NC50001801
Animal
NG50002706
Invertebrate
NG50014695
Invertebrate
NC50018552
Animal
NC50021673
Invertebrate
NORTH CAROLINA SIGNIFICANT NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS DATABASE:
ID Name
NC10003353 SWIFT CREEK(VANCEANARREN/FRANKLIN/NASH/EDGECOMBE) AQUATIC HABITAT
TC4830486.2s Page A-12

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 4830486.2s
n/
County Boundary
D iu v2
1 Miles
n/
Major Roads
Contour Lines
Groundwater Flow Direction
Wildlife Areas
OQ
Earthquake epicenter. Richter 5 or greater
c I
Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location
Natural Areas
Q
Water Wells
CV
Groundwater Flow Varies at Location
Rare & Endangered Species
©
Public Water Supply Wells
•
Cluster of Multiple Icons
SITE NAME: CCX Site CLIENT: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
ADDRESS: 9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW CONTACT: Vicki Garlington
TARBORO NC 27886 INQUIRY #: 4830486.2s
LATILONG: 35.9976 / 77.606541 DATE: January 18, 2017 10:55 am
Cop gbI ,:, 2017 ER. Inc c 2C15 To.Tom Rel 2015

GEOCHECK©- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
I
NC_NHEO NC50001801
GIS ID: 103413
Classification by Type: Animal
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50002706
GIS ID:
Classification by Type:
Occurrence Status:
112073
Invertebrate
Extant
NC_NHEO NC50014695
GIS ID: 142099
Classification by Type: Invertebrate
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50018552
GIS ID: 1912136
Classification by Type: Animal
Occurrence Status: Historic, no evidence of destruction
NC_NHEO NC50021673
GIS ID: 72430
Classification by Type: Invertebrate
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_SNHA NC10003353
Site Name: SWIFT CREEK (VANCE/WARREN/FRANKLIN/NASH/EDGECOMBE) AQUATIC HABITAT
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: 508.34
TC4830486.2s Page A-14

GEOCHECK«)- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
1 2.00 2 2
Federal EPA Radon Zone for EDGECOMBE County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCVL.
Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCVL.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code:
27886
Number of sites tested: 1
Area
Average Activity
% <4 pCi/L
% 4-20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1st Floor
0.300 pCVL
100%
0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Basement
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
%>20 oCi/L
0%
Not Reported
Not Reported
TC4830486.2s Page A-15

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and 03 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone:[phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
Soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC4830486.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Sale Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NO Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
NC Game Lands: Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NO Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
RADON
State Database: NO Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC4830486.2s Page PSGR-2

u PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC4830486.2s Page PSGR-3

amec
foster
wheeler
APPENDIX C
User Provided Questionnaires

User Questionnaire
Phase I E54 Potential ,tlitigation Pmcel
Edgecombe County. Forth Carolina
PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
USER QUESTIONNAIRE
Introduction:
In order to comply with ASTM E 1527-13 and with the Standard for All Appropriate Inquires issued by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency as set forth in the 40 CFR 312, the user, who is defined
below, must provide the information that is requested below to the Environmental Professional. If the user
fails to provide this information, a court could determine that the All Appropriate Inquiry was not complete.
User is defined as the party seeking to use ASTM E 1527-15 to complete an environmental site assessment
of the property. A user may include, without limitation, a potential purchaser of property, a potential tenant
of property, an owner of property, a lender, or a property manager. The user has specific obligations as
outlined in Section 6 of ASTM E 1527-13. The User will normally be the Client.
The User can obtain a copy of ASTM E 1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments:
Phase t Environmental Site Assessment Process at the ASTM web site httpJ/www.astm.org/.
In any case where the questionnaire requests an explanation or the User believes that additional information
is appropriate, please provide all relevant information on an attached sheet and identify the question to
which the information pertains.
Site Information:
Potential Mitigation Parcel
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
1. Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site (See, CFR 312.25)
Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under
federal, tribal, state or local law? __yes or -no If yes, please explain.
2. Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded
in a registry (See, 40 CFR 312.26)
Are you aware of any activity and use limitations, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or
institutional controls that are in place at the sit and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under
_
federal, tribal, state or local law? yes or sit
If yes, please explain.

User Questronnarre
Phase 1 ESA Potential Margatlon Parcel
Edeecontbe County. North Carolina
3. Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to quality for the Landowner Liability
Protections (See, 40 CFR 312.28)
As the user of this Phase I. do you h ve any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property
or nearby properties? yes or no If yes. please explain.
Are you involved in the same line of business as the Current of fornier occupants of the property or an
adjoining property so that you would ve specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used
by that type of business? yes or no If yes, please explain.
4. Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not
contaminated (See, 40 CFR 312,29) (Applicable in a transaction involving the purchase of a
parcel of commercial real estate.)
Does the p rchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the
Property? yes or no if you answer the preceding question other than yes, please answer the
following question.
If you concluded that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is
because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? _--Yes or no If yes,
please explain.
5. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (See, 40 CFR
312,30)
Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that
would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of a release or threatened
release? _des or no For example, as user:
• Do you know the past uses of the property? yes or no If yes, please explain.
• Do you know of s ecific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property?
_yes or no If yes, please explain.

User Questionnaire
Phase 1 ESA Potential Mitigation Parcel
Edgerombe County, North Carolina
• Do you know of s ills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property?
_yes or no If yes, please explain.
• Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property?
_yes or -,X,no If yes, please explain.
6. The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property,
and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation (See, 40 CFR 312.31)
As the user of this Phase 1, based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there
any obvious .ndicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property?
_des or no if yes, please explain.
7
Signed/Date
(Please Circle One)
I ���y Ccusr`rS U, I
Printed Name / Title
Property Owner; Former Property Owner Potential Buyer of Property; eal Estate Agent; Other
(if other, please explain)
"Adapted, with permission, from E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment Process,
copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19248 "

- IV
amec
foster
wheeler
APPENDIX D
EDR Historical Reports

CCX Site
9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW
TARBORO, NC 27886
Inquiry Number: 4830486.5
January 19, 2017
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
(rEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com

RFCMON
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and
surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE
WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY
OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR
OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, ANY LIABILITY ON
THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT
PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk
levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any
property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide
information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to
be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in
part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.
All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
10*144 12t10.1
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.
EDR's City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals.
RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates
where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.
Year
Target Street
Cross Street
Source
2013
d
❑
Cole Information Services
2008
0El
Cole Information Services
2003
0
Cole Information Services
1999
El
171
Polk's City Directory
1995
Polk's City Directory
1992
Polk's City Directory
1987
El
Polk's City Directory
1982
Hill's City Directory
1977
Hill's City Directory
1973
Hill's City Directory
1969
171Hill's
City Directory
1964
El
Hill's City Directory
RECORD SOURCES
EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The
purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer.
Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of
copyright.
4830486-5 Pagel

FINDINGS
TARGET PROPERTY STREET
9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW
TARBORO, NC 27886
Year CD Image Source
NC HIGHWAY 33 NW
2013
pg A2
Cole Information Services
2008
pg A4
Cole Information Services
2003
pg A6
Cole Information Services
1999
Polk's City Directory
1995
Polk's City Directory
1992
Polk's City Directory
1987
Polk's City Directory
1982
Hill's City Directory
1977
Hill's City Directory
1973
Hill's City Directory
1969
Hill's City Directory
1964
Hill's City Directory
Street not listed in Source
Street not listed in Source
Street not listed in Source
Street not listed in Source
Street not listed in Source
Street not listed in Source
Street not listed in Source
Street not listed in Source
Street not listed in Source
4830486-5
Page 2

FINDINGS
CROSS STREETS
No Cross Streets Identified
4830486-5
Page 3

City Directory Images

Target Street Cross Street Source
✓ - Cole Information Services
NC HIGHWAY 33 NW 2013
3309 33 GRILL & OYSTER BAR
3378 CARDINAL FORESTRY SERVICES
3446 RALPH WHITEHURST
3628 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
3642 KENNETH WEBB
4185 APRIL JOYNER
MICHAEL MATTHEWS
4203 GEORGE LEONARD
4265 JERRY DIXON
4287 DIXON JERRY
DIXON JERRY & SON PLUMBING & DRAIN C
4340 PAMELA WARREN
4341 MARTIN BAUTISTA
4397 TOMMY WHITEHURST
4455 BETHLEHEM BAPTIST CHURCH
4485 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4501 MARIA PRICE
4517 DAVID WILLIAMS
4557 GARY SCOTT
4605 JAMES PILGREEN
4627 KENZIE LANGLEY
4673 EDGAR GARDNER
4677 FELICIANO HERNANDEZ
4695 JASMINE BOSWELL
SARAH LAWRENCE
WAYNE ROBERTSON
4721 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4733 MARLON PETWAY
4774 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4779 BORN AGAIN MINISTRYTHE TRIUMPHANT
MARY HARPER
5005 TONY SMITH
5013 GEORGIA SPRAGION
5019 MATTIE SUTTON
5033 CLARENCE MITCHELL
5069 GLENN JONES
5142 DEXTER STANCIL
5207 GRACE HYDE
5221 JOE PADGETT
5259 EZ MART
5273 JUAN VELASCO
5281 JOSE LABRA
5360 BETH THOMAS
5716 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
5732 ANDRE KEARNEY
5754 JHIMAL LASCO
MARVIN ROUNTREE
5776 JIMMY KNOX
5858 BERNARD PITTMAN
6061 PEGGY GOODWIN
4830486.5 Page: A2

Target -Street Cross Street Source
✓ - Cole Information Services
NC HIGHWAY 33 NW 2013
6385 KELSTER WHEELER
6571 LUKE ANDERSON
6756 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
6830 ANTHONY PENDER
6838 ODESSA TILLERY
6950 ETHEL COKER
7218 GARY SKELTON
7348 STEVE PAVELSKY
7378 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
7396 LITTLE GROWNUPS CHILD CARE CENTER 2
7407 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
7419 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
7434 CLARE HEINZ
7455 AUBREY EDMONDS
7466 JAMES HICKS
7477 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
7626 JAMES HOWARD
7689 RONNIE CASPER
7848 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
7919 WILLIE MILLS
9117 PAUL GILBERT
(Copt"d)
4830486.5 Page: A3

Target Street Cross Street Source
✓ - Cole Information Services
NC HIGHWAY 33 NW 2008
3309 33 GRILL LLC
3446 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
3628 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4185 MICHAEL MATTHEWS
4203 JOHNNY LEONARD
4265 JERRY DIXON
KATHERINE BLACKMAN
ROB LYNN
4287 ALMA BLANCO
DIXON JERRY
4340 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4341 MARTINA BAUTISTA
4397 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4455 BETHLEHEM BAPTIST CHURCH
4485 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4501 PATTI WEBB
4517 DAVID WILLIAMS
4557 GARY SCOTT
4559 SCOTT PLUMBING & SEPTIC SERVICE
4605 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4627 RICKY LANGLEY
4653 ARTEMIO HERNANDEZ
4673 KENNETH BULLOCK
4695 FRANK ROBERTSON
SARAH LAWRENCE
4721 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4733 COLUMBUS PETWAY
4774 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4779 MARY HARPER
5005 TONY SMITH
5013 GEORGIA SPRAGION
5033 TIMOTHY MITCHELL
5039 CASADA KEARNEY
5069 LAURA LEE
5207 GRACE HYDE
5259 S & M CONVENIENT MART
5360 JR WEILAND
5716 JOHN KENNEY
5732 FRANK KEARNEY
5754 JULIUS DRAUGHN
5776 JIMMY KNOX
6385 YVETTE WHEELER
6571 HIGH VALUE INVESTMENTS LLC
LUKE ANDERSON
6704 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
6753 MARY PENDER
6756 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
6802 ESTER FENDER
PENDER ENTERPRISE
6830 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4830486.5 Page: A4

Target Street Cross Street Source
✓ - Cole Information Services
NC HIGHWAY 33 NW 2008
6838 WILLIS TILLERY
6950 ETHEL COKER
7218 JR SKELTON
7348 STEVE PAVELSKY
7396 THOMAS BEAMON
7419 ALBERT LYNCH
7434 JERRY HEINZ
7455 AUBREY EDMONDS
7477 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
7564 BIG JIMS FOOD MART OF LEGGETT INC
7689 RONNIE GASPER
7848 COASTAL PLANE
7919 WILLIE MILLS
(Cont'd)
4830486.5 Page: A5

Target Street Cross Street
✓ _
Source
Cole Information Services
NC HIGHWAY 33 NW
4265
JOHN RINEHART
4340
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4559
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
4695
ALICE LAWRENCE
4779
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
5013
GEORGIA SPRAGION
5039
CASADA KEARNEY
5225
JANET HOLLINGSWORTH
6385
KELSTER WHEELER
6704
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
6756
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
6830
KATEISHA PENDER
6950
ARNOLD COKER
7564
BIG JIMS FOOD MRT LGGTT INC
7589
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN
2003
4830486.5 Page: A6

CCX Site
9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW
TARBORO, NC 27886
Inquiry Number: 4830486.9
January 18, 2017
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
(rEDR � Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www_edrnet.com

EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 01/18/17
Site Name: Client Name:
CCX Site AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
9117 NC HIGHWAY 33 NW 4021 Stirrup creek Drive Suite 100 CEDR
TARBORO, NC 27886 Durham, NC 27703
EDR Inquiry # 4830486.9 Contact: Vicki Garlington
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year Scale
2012
1"=500,
2010
1 "=500'
2009
1 "=500'
2008
1"=500'
2006
1"=500,
2005
1"=500'
1998
1"=750'
1994
1982
1980
1976
1974
1954
1 "=500'
1 "=500'
1 "=1000'
1 "=1000'
1 "=1000'
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2012
Flight Year: 2010
Flight Year: 2009
Flight Year: 2008
Flight Year: 2006
Flight Year: 2005
Flight Date: January 05, 1998
Acquisition Date: February 27, 1994
Flight Date: March 09, 1982
Flight Date: March 15, 1980
Flight Date: November 13, 1976
Flight Date: April 10, 1974
Flight Date: March 07, 1954
Source
USDA/NAIP
USDA/NAIP
USDA/NAIP
USDA/NAIP
USDA/NAIP
USDA/NAIP
USGS
USGS/DOQQ
USGS
USGS
USGS
USGS
USGS
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage Information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report'AS IS'. Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
4830486 - 9 page 2

t
it 7i
j� � ,+.' r "f r'•• R• rf ,". 1+ ,t Cyr
,r ♦ rfJ ��S i..;• 'ft�i r�r'7r���1'y�iSr �j �lZ fie
•.
JK
IV
� ! l,itRr,rt*+{"•i,a3 1: �'�''� {Yi mm,
,�f�yxy<
a t x, �� �' �y '� �'�'✓ - G a �i s '� t � j.;. � Y?'�� t� �. �:•f'itit�F�,�� s-• r
�1f �;�� r• i4 � ��>+_ .1 `�rt �r�6 n. �'y7����' �� i`�{��'r: <•�'�°)`�Y�� ����y� ,e���+ t ����i'r� - � _- ".
4i�ri7 r �{_ ,��.•�'(}y � r,.. L'+�.��� �� l�♦Y i.l� � ls}v. A.SI �+.''•tf J:ir Y %+ 1N•(
� ,a 1� p' t � �,y.i,�:,� d !- yi. � .tih�,.:} ! 6F1: �+� a+:� {� ♦ Y /•�+,r'�+ f J}iit � � ,�i:.
t5 ,� �.te.�•. � •> @7.�'k•.J t, �;� r. +f "��` �S. ir.'�•3�!is r7f'+d•� r 4. • t`1.��. tr -
�I -.i.' �G•. f'`s c t► ta3: r. t'� 4 ,r,i -✓+ t '�� ryj '". e ,� �' � y� )w,s � � .> WV
t
'�,+C�.eV astir ?7 >- i t s, ilj isr•`� r7.+ lsi r��'3✓ [' �i � a. $a�6r;fit rj j►•.• + ++' '' '''*- pit
r 4 5 ,�'. �y•.��, � ♦ ,y. v . i� a 1y, tt�� r��. � y5u„1ri = �� '19-'; `7�}�,, =f�"• r r^ J ir� ,�4 ',�� le ' �; � '� r . �`,� �, v1� 't•• r r � � ; i i.:' %F 1`�,a ''}'1'��{� '��� ``1 �rif N � I '` /' L C J
\ • !1 5 v .
yyy'� t
'T • +', •� rr• • • pY ) f' r_ i t�) �^y{ - � ��• r' �yy+T'�.\' �Af .a tVi � `•� •� V rr r• i x i -f.� f F� Xa 't '):t1�4•. �.�.,,, �• �. ty �•� � ,
�.�.✓• �'. ]. > r rrr.y� f �J,lar ♦n tfjfY•h�`�^`(t� `y!C � �ti +i � �� /.
�' 1{ - 1:. V J� •.I i''• it 1 1J� Ui �:� yy{{,, !�1' �' \ .
�
( • >f • Ss • s • 4 '�,r a r: �� > � ' , N �',\� t1 f e�•r y �tr y i
.1�•.
•;{Y A 'T 1 i i 7 �� r+r 'i r f 1 `P i 1 •}••" 3a '� �• ,>t ;, r r r , ,ei ; rS. h r . . ,7,. ) �t`}l�� yl tir ,P � ',(�'I'y;-� rF.�,#�• ,-
�iy' � j S r-lr. 1. )14 / -- `t '�' �F � i x, i 4.��'f�// � ' "�,• ��117� t I?� � i n��',1a �� . \R' 1 • � ft
L. r1... y� ♦ ,,� 9 TTKK �y4�}, S� #�.1t �!r �y: � t.
,Y' .Y • �',�. JC�r�:R \YS/�..f }�',[��yla•+ �1'r�3 Ei �t(+.jY 4� I, n� �• t'Si.
rt� ! a� y �k. f a ff fr r } aaFF"--4g� cn x r r �� /fat, r }r E' i<yr,•�•,y.
. 1 lri�
/��*''� µr• ')i'G�4r' •►' !+1 iy#x "•,iC ►f Si Y+ ���" �+�R'yt'�at�,9rA_� t�•s� .}:«',Sit ,I,y r. �f `r,}
x • ✓t: i J / y 4 � !Z - � rl, 21} ! Sal ! M4 � 1 ` r, �t��5•,i.•i.:iXr f i µ n } t3 '("t''79 ��'
£''f�1.' Her. ►Ii ry it �. 6`. f.� .�Y f:4'•,{•,�t I''t Xr'~' "{r>r Yf��)ry 1•<T + 4 'J t
4 '
is1I .>t 4 S {.: �k # {ir>r %yts�y rK�tis al•y a� tTI
. fr tit. C
'" F �- r J.yi yF:1.7
,:, .• r t-• `.�y-. ('_ ` ty'i!'yS{ r 7 ' r %>•.3'►3;r,. r• �'I' Ii� •'t i Srjs 7 r
' � y

kit
INQUIRY #: 4830486.9
YEAR'. 2010 � N
500' (rEDR'

4Lar
sP
.AQUIRY #: 4830486,9
....... .....
YEAR: 2009
DR'
500' CE

- •,
r
L�
'1
•r � t'ti. 1 L
� R G i'�rr ,1.
r 1,
\1
x
1,
INQUIRY #: 4830486.9
.
YEAR U
2008
500' (rEDR
a,' t

0
Alp
%kA
w
P2
qu*
0

06
+V 10
rr
ir
lb
r
�-
r
IL
JV
NQUIRY #: 4830486.9'
j� N 1 "� ` •
YEAR: 1998 u ■ _ - ; •`•i i ' s�

Rector, William
From: Rich Mogensen [maiIto :rich@ mogensenmitigation.coml
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:19 AM
To: Witherspoon, Josh <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Mitigation Credit Availability
We will be able to supply your project with at least 500 SMU's as well as nutrient and/or buffer credits if needed this
summer. RM
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Witherspoon, Josh <[e-mail]> wrote:
Rich — We understand that you do not have any wetland credits available. Is this also the case for stream credits?
Josh Witherspoon, LSS, PWS
Senior 2 Ecologist, Environment and Infrastructure Americas, Amec Foster Wheeler
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100, Durham, INC 27703
T (919)-381-9900 D (919j 381-1402 M (919)-219-9549 VOIP #748-1402
iosh.witherspoon(iDamectw.com amecfw.com
From: Rich Mogensen [maiIto: rich@mosensenmitigation .coml
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 9:43 AM
To: Witherspoon, Josh <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Mitigation Credit Availability
Hi Josh - We will have stream and Nutrient/Buffer credits available this summer but not enough to meet that amount.
We do not have any wetlands as they were all sold to DMS. Let me know if you need more details. RichMogensen
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 26, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Witherspoon, Josh <[e-mail]> wrote:
Rich —We have a project site within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin in Edgecombe County that we need wetland and stream
mitigation credits. The site is in Tar -Pamlico HUC 03020101. The mitigation credits needed include 43.1 wetland credits
and 16,150 stream credits, Do you have credits available to meet the mitigation requirements for this project? Thanks.
Josh Witherspoon, LSS, PWS
Senior 2 Ecologist, Environment and Infrastructure Americas, Amec Foster Wheeler
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100, Durham, NC 27703
T (919)-381-9900 D (919}381-1402 M (919)-219-9549 VOIP #748-1402
[osh.withers000nOamecfw.com am c .com