NCG551785_Fact Sheet_20230309

FACT SHEET FOR GENERAL PERMIT NCG550000
Discharge of Domestic Wastewater from Single Family Residences
and
Other 100% Domestic Discharges with Similar Characteristics
Basic Information
Permit Writer / Date
Siying Chen 1/27/2023
Permit Number
NCG551785
Owner Name
Ton D' Amato Jr and Heidi L D' Amato
Facility Address
1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546
Count / Regional Office
Onslow / WiRO
Basin Name / Sub -basin number
White Oak / 03-05-02
Receiving Stream / HUC
UT to Horse Swam / 030203020202
Stream Classification / Stream Segment
C; NSW / 19-16-2-1
Latitude/Longitude
34° 46' 6.6" N, 77° 16' 23.5" W
Facility Overview:
3-Bedroom (360 gallons per day) single family residence; has an unpermitted, pre-existing failing sub-
surface system.
Treatment system consists of a new 1250 gallon baffled conventional concrete septic tank with effluent
filter which gravity flows to an AdvanTex AX20-RT Pod recirculating treatment unit (1 recirculation
pump @ 18 gpm) with control panel and pump on/off float switches plus high water float alarm. It is
recommended the alarm systems (high water and UV intensity) be connected to a dialer notification
system (panel is equipped for set-up). Effluent from the pod gravity -flows through a UV unit to a rip rap
discharge structure at pipe outlet to tributary.
Proposed Improvements/Construction:
Replacement of the existing treatment system with the following new treatment system:
• New septic tank with effluent filter
• AdvanTex AX-20 RT Pod
• Re -circulation pump chamber (Integrated into AdvanTex Pod system)
• UV disinfection
• Discharge point with rip -rap
Hydrologic Trespass:
The proposed discharge point is in Sheep Pen Branch, a tributary of Horse Swamp, located on a
neighboring property owned by Sandra G. King. An easement was written to allow the discharge pipe to
cross the neighboring property to get access to Sheep Pen Branch
Page 1 of 2

Staff Report:
Staff report received from WiRO (B. Steven West) on 2/3/2023. WiRO recommends issuance.
Alternatives Summary (EAA):
Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System
o City of Jacksonville indicated that the sewer is not currently available for the applicant's
property and there are no plans to extend sewer at this time, the property is well beyond
the city limits and there is no sewer service anywhere near the property. The closest
sewer system to the subject property is in excess of 8 miles, at an estimated cost of 100/ft,
the cost to extend the sewer line would be $ 4,224,000 (plus engineering and tap fees).
Land Application
o The Onslow County Health Department indicated that the site is unsuitable for
installation of a ground absorption septic system in letter dated March 1, 2006. The letter
indicated there were no repair options for the malfunctioning wastewater system.
o Nicholas P. Howell with Land Management Group indicated that the site does not have
adequate space and suitable soil to accommodate a non- discharge surface spray or drip
wastewater system. His findings indicated the only repair option is a discharge system.
Wastewater Reuse
o No suitable soil for a reclaimed water system. No reasonable ability to operate as a bulk
distributor of reclaimed water.
Direct Discharge to Surface Waters
o The United States Geological Survey indicated that the 7Q10 and 30Q2 are assumed to
be 0.
Combination of Alternatives
o There are no viable combinations of the above due to soil and cost limitations.
Page 2 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15F5C561-68D3-40FE-8E25-5EFA694B4125
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
" Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ® NPDES Unit ❑ Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: NCG551785
Attn: Siying Chen Facility name: D'Amato SFR
From: Steve West
Wilmington Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facili . staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 2/l/2023
b. Site visit conducted by: Steve West
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ® No
d. Person contacted: Heidi D'Amato
e. Driving directions: 1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville
2. Discharge Point(s): 34 46 6.6 -77 16 23.5
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: UT to Horse Swamp
Classification: C NSW
River Basin and Subbasin No. White Oak 19-16-2-1
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Low flow (30Q2=0) limited use
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS:
1. Facility Classification: N/A -SFR
Proposed flow: 360 gpd
Current permitted flow: N/A
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Pagel of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15F5C561-68D3-40FE-8E25-5EFA694B4125
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme: N/A
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: None known
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS: N/A
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15F5C561-68D3-40FE-8E25-5EFA694B4125
6. Signature of report preparer: _
Signature of regional supervisor:
2/2/2023
Date:
—DocuSigned by:
6, ShV4,W wt,Sf 2/2/2023
—DocuSigned by:
Milk 544
E3ABA14AC7DC434...
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS:
Site visit on 2/1/23. Proposed receiving tributaa (30Q2=0) was noted to be 1-2 feet deep with moderate velocity.
Scattered showers during the week of the visit. The tributary flows through a sparsely populated residential area before
joining Horse Swamp (C NSW).
Submittal package contains a thorough evaluation of alternative non -discharge disposal options, and sufficiently shows
none are environmentally or economically feasible.
Treatment system submittal is straightforward and consists of a new 1250 gallon baffled conventional concrete septic tank
with effluent filter which gravity flows to an AdvanTex AX20-RT Pod recirculating treatment unit (1 recirculation pump
k, 18 gpm) with control panel and pump on/off float switches plus high water float alarm. It is recommended the alarm
systems high water and UV intensity) be connected to a dialer notification systempanel is equipped for set-up .
Effluent from the pod rg avity-flows through a UV unit to a rip rap discharge structure at pipe outlet to tributar,
This office would like to do a start-up inspection upon completion. It is recommended permit no. NCG551785 be issued
for the D'Amato property at 1961 Rocky Run Road in Jacksonville
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 3

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR,
Director
Tony D'Amato, Jr
Heidi L. D'amato
41649 Elk Run Dr
Murrieta, CA 92562
Subject: Permit Renewal
Application No. NCG551785
1961 Rocky Run Road
❑nslow County
Dear Applicant:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 26, 2022
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges receipt of your application for a new NPDES WW permit, including
supporting documentation and your check number 6254 in the amount of $69.00 as payment of the application fee. These
items were received in our offices on April 26, 2022. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the
Section's NPDES WW permitting branch. The permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to
complete evaluation of your application. Your timely and direct response to any such request will help to expedite the
review process. Please note that acceptance of the application does not guarantee a NPDES permit will be issued for the
proposed activity. A permit will only be issued following a complete review of the application, concluding the proposed
discharge is allowable per applicable statutes and rules.
Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
htti)s:lldeQ. nc.gov/permits- reg u lations/permit-gu ida nce/envi ron me nta I-appl ication-tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
Sincerely,
Wren Th for
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
cc: Kevin Davidson-AWT
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
North Ca, ohna Department of Crwfronmental Qualhy I DWls Ion of water R—urccs
Wllmlrgton Rrgional 0111ce 1 127 Cardinal Drive EATMs10n mtmingion. North Carolina 28405
iw..�-Aw;
910.79h.7215

b� 1 2
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Mr. John Hennessy
NPDES Permitting Program
NCDEQ - Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Application for Discharge System — D'Amato Property
1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546
Dear Mr. Hennessy;
RECEIVED
APR 2 6 2022
NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES
April 21, 2022
Enclosed, please find one (1) copy of a discharge system permit application package. A
check in the amount of $60.00 to NC DEQ is also enclosed. The proposed system will
replace a failing sub -surface system located at the residence. The property is located at
1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546 and is owned by Mr. Tony D'Amato Jr
and Heidi L D'Amato. The residence is located in Qnslow County.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely;
Kevin D. Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering

b� \ 2
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Mr. John Hennessy
NPDES Permitting Program
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Application for Discharge System — D'Amato Property
1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546
Dear Mr. Hennessy,
ZZ.
April 20, 2022
Enclosed please find information supporting an application for a discharge system for a 3-
Bedroom Single -Family Residence (SFR) located in Qnslow County, North Carolina. The
proposed system will replace a failing sub -surface system that currently serves the residence. The
site has been deemed unsuitable for ground absorption sewage treatment systems by the
Onslow County Health Department due to unsuitable soil conditions and insufficient space.
The proposed system is to be sized for 3 bedrooms (360 gallons per day) and has been designed
to convey all wastewater from the SFR, including greywater, to the new septic tank. The site's
existing septic tank is to be abandoned. This application is being submitted with the intent to
have coverage under the NCG55 General Permit. Coverage under this permit is sought to
replace a failed sub -surface system.
The following information is included with this letter:
- Notice of intent (NCG550000). Attachment A.
$60 check payable to North Carolina DEQ.
- Documentation from Qnslow County Health Department. Attachment B.
- Letter requesting coverage under the General Permit. Attachment C.
- Letter requesting Authorization to Construct. Attachment D.
- Soiis Evaluation report by Nicholas Howell, L.S.S. Attachment E.
Correspondence from USGS. Attachment F.
Flow Path to "Blue Lire" Water Feature. Attachment G.
o Signed Easement
Information on connection to Regional Sewer System. Attachment H.
- Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA). Attachment L
Local Government Review Forms. Attachment J.
Plans and Specifications for the proposed system. Attachment K.
1 of 131

The proposed discharge point is in Sheep Pen Branch, a tributary of Horse Swamp,
located on a neighboring property owned by Sandra G. King. An easement was written to
allow the discharge pipe to cross the neighboring property to get access to Sheep Pen
Branch. The discharge system will utilize the following components:
New Septic Tank with Effluent Filter
- AdvanTex AX-20 RT Pod
Re -circulation Pump Chamber (Integrated into AdvanTex Pod System)
UV Disinfection
- Discharge Point with Rip -Rap
Flow Path to "Blue Line" Water Feature
The discharge point is Sheep Pen Branch, a tributary of Horse Swamp. Flow will be
conveyed through the discharge pipe into Sheep Pen Branch and ultimately will reach
Horse Swamp, the "Blue Line" Water Feature. A map showing the path from the
discharge point to the first "blue -line" stream, as shown on the NC DEQ Stream
Classification Map, can be seen in Attachment G.
Receiving Stream Horse Swam
Stream Class C:NS W
Notice of Intent
As part of the Notice of Intent, the feasibility of alternatives to discharging must be
addressed. The following alternatives are to be evaluated:
Connection to a regional or municipal sewer collection system.
Letter from the local or county health department describing the suitability
or non -suitability of the site for all types of wastewater ground adsorption
and innovative non -discharge systems, as well as documenting the repair
potential of the failed system.
Investigate land application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation.
Connection to a Regional or Municipal Sewer Collection System
Connection to a sewer collection system is not feasible for this property. Wally Hansen,
Public Services Director for the City of Jacksonville, NC, has indicated that sewer is not
currently available for the applicant's property and there are no plans to extend sewer at
this time. Mr. Hansen also specified that the property is well beyond the city limits and
there is no sewer service anywhere near the property. This would indicate that the closest
sewer system to the subject property is in excess of 8 miles. At an estimated cost of
$100Jft, the cost to extend the sewer line would be $4,224,000 (plus engineering and tap
fees).
2 of 131

Letter from the local or county health department describing the suitability or non -
suitability of the site for all types of wastewater ground adsorption and innovative
non -discharge systems. Document the repair potential of the failed system.
The Dnslow County Health Department indicated that the site is unsuitable for
installation of a ground absorption septic system in letter dated March 1, 2006.
(Attachment B). The letter indicated there were no repair options for the malfunctioning
wastewater system.
Investigate Land Application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation.
Per the soil evaluation by Nicholas P. Howell, L.S.S., the site does not have adequate
space and suitable soil to accommodate a non -discharge surface spray or drip wastewater
system (Attachment E). His findings indicated the only repair option is a discharge
system.
7Q14 Flow Estimate
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) was contacted to determine the 7Q10 and
30Q2 flow estimates for the proposed wastewater discharge point. The proposed
discharge point is in Sheep Pen Branch, a tributary of Horse Swamp, The analysis from
USGS indicates the 7Q10 discharge for the point in question is likely zero. (Attachment
F).
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
An Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) has been completed for this site and is
included as Attachment H. The completed EAA demonstrates that a wastewater
treatment system permitted under the NCG550000 General Discharge Permit is the only
feasible option for this site. We have exhausted all other options for this site as follows:
a.) connection to a municipal or regional sewer collection system
- Not feasible due to costs (at the present time).
h.) subsurface disposal
- Inadequate soil for a subsurface absorption system.
c.) single-family residence wastewater irrigation (drip and spray)
- Inadequate soil and not feasible due to fill soil costs for a
non -discharge ground absorption system.
d. j reclaimed -water systems
- Inadequate soil and not feasible due to fill soil costs for a
reclaimed water system. No reasonable ability to operate
as a bulk distributor of reclaimed water.
e) Any viable combination of the above
- There are no viable combinations of the above due to soil
and cost limitations.
Local Government Review Forms
As part of the EAA, Local Government Review Forms were sent to Onslow Courr
the Town of Jacksonville. A copy of the form submittals is included as Attachment
date, the completed forms have not been received.

Plans and Specifications
PIans and Specifications for the proposed system are included as Attachment J.
I appreciate your time and efforts in reviewing this application. If you have any
questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at 919-859-0669.
Best Regards,
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering
SnMK111

Attachment List
Attachment A Notice of Intent (NCG550000)
Attachment B Documentation From Onslow County Health Department
Attachment C Letter Requesting Coverage Under the General Permit
Attachment D Letter requesting Authorization to Construct
Attachment E Soil Evaluation
Attachment F 1. Correspondence from USGS
2. Stream Classification
Attachment G 1. Flow Path to "Blue Line" Water Feature
2. Signed Easement
Attachment H Information on Connection to a Regional Sewer System
Attachment I
Attachment J
Attachment K
Engineering Alternatives Analysis

Attachment A
Notice of Intent (NCG554000)
6 of 131

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES)
Division of Water resources
_ Application for SURFACE DISCHARGE
Envirortmenrol Certificate of Coverage (COC) Under
Qualify General Permit NCG550000
For Single -Family Residences and Similar Discharges
100%-domestic wastewater - 5 1, 000 gallons per day
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year
Month
Day
-)-;).
Ceni6sate orcoverage (COC)
N
C
G
5
15
Check #
Amount
Assigned to:
The Division of Water Resources will not accept an application package unless all instructions are followed.
Failure to submit all required items may result in the application being returned. For more information, visit
the Water Quality Permitting Section's NPDES Permitting Unit website. (Press TAB to navigate farm)
1. Regional Office Contact: Please contact your DWR Regional Office before submitting this
application. If you have not met with your appropriate DWR Regional Office Representative, the
application will be returned.
Please list the DWR Regional Office representative(s) with whom you have discussed this project:
Name(s): Morelia Sanchez -King Date: 4/20/2022
2. Owner's Contact Information:
Applicant Type: ® Individual ❑ Corporation ❑ Partnership
RECEIVED
APR 2 6 2022
Owner Name and Title: Tony D'Amato Jr and Heidi L D'Amato, Owners NCDEQ/DWPINPDES
Street Address: 41649 Elk Run Drive
City: Mu rrieta
Telephone #(H): 910-650-1591
Ce1VMobile #: 910-650-1591
State: CA Zip: 92562 -
Telephone # (W):
Email: [e-mail]
3. Location of Facility Producing the Discharge: Please list the address of the facility. If facility is not yet
constructed, give street address or lot number.
Street Address: 1961 Rocky Run Road
City: Jacksonvitle
County: Onslow
Telephone #: [phone]
Website: -
4. Site -Location Narrative:
State: NC Zip: 28546 -
Cell/Mobile #: 910-65&-1591
Please describe how to get to the facility from the nearest town, major highway or identifiable roadway
intersection (use street names, state road numbers, and/or distances and directions).
From NC-24, turn left on to Piney Green Read. Continue on Piney Green Road for 0.8 miles and turn right
onto Rocky Run Road NCSR 1413). Follow Rocky Run Road for 4.6 miles and the oroperty will he can the
left side (near the corner of Rocky Run Road, NCSR 1413, and Old 30 Road, NCSR 1423.
Pagel of 6 Revised: A. Orlando NPDES 21Sept2017
7 of 131

Application for Certificate of Coverage (COG) and/or Authorization to Construct (ATC)
under General -Permit NCG550000
5. Describe the nature of the project. ["New" means has not yet been physically constructed, "existing"
means system already physically exists. Please see 15A NCAC 02H .0103(i 1) for further clarification].
❑ Installation of a New Wastewater Treatment System (If yes, skip to Number 9.)
❑ Expansion of an Existing Wastewater Treatment System (for example, adding bedrooms) (Ifyes,
skip to Number 9.)
® Replacement of an Existing Wastewater Treatment System (Ifyes, go to Number 6.)
6. Describe the Existing Wastewater Treatment System:
® Conventional Septic Tank/Leach-field -- Discharge to Sub -Surface Soils. If previously permitted,
please attach a copy of the permit or enter the permit number _
If you are not aware of an existing permit, check here. ❑
❑ Sandfilter — Discharge to Surface Waters for other, as defined 15A NCAC 02H.0103(11)]. If
previously permitted, please attach a copy of the permit or enter the permit number. if you are not
aware of an existing permit, check here. ❑
❑ Filter Media System ,Pod SystemL Discharge to Surface Waters [or other, as defined 15A NCAC
02H.0103(11)]. if previously permitted, please attach a copy of the permit or the permit number.
If you are not aware of an existing permit, check here. ❑
❑ Other
❑ Check here if submitting proposal for a new system or if no treatment system exists.
7. Check all EXISTING wastewater treatment components:
® Septic tank ❑ Dosing tank ❑
❑ Primary sand filter ❑ Secondary sand filter ❑
❑ Chlorination ❑ Dechlorination ❑
❑ Self -Contained POD system [describe]
® Leach Field
❑ Post Aeration (sped type)
UV disinfection
Recirculating sand filter(s)
Other components: Click here to enter text.
8. Provide Details of Single -Family Residence (SFR) or Similar Facility:
a) Type of facility:
® Residential ❑ Commercial
❑ Other:
b) Amount of wastewater discharged:
- Residential: Number of bedrooms 3 x 120 gallons per bedroom = 360 gallons per
day (flow)
- Commercial: How many employees? (25 gpd/person)
Page 2 of 6 Revised: A. Orlando NPDES Mep12017
8 of 131

Application for Certificate of Coverage (COC) and/or Authorization to Construct (ATC)
under General -Permit NCG550000
c) Is your existing treatment system failing? Yes ® Na ❑
d) Has the Health Department formally condemned your existing system
"unsuitable for repair?" Yes ® No ❑
x If yes, please name the Health Department [local, county, or state], and provide the site -
inspection date [attach Health Department's judgement letter, if available]: Documentation from
Onslow County included in application package 05/01/2006
If previously permitted [local, county, or state], provide permit number and date issued [attach
copy, if available]: Onslow County Permit No. 5537, 12/12/1977
9. Check all PROPOSED new system components
® Septic tank ❑ Dosing tank ® UV disinfection:
❑ Primary sand filter ❑ Secondary sand filter ❑ Recirculating sand filter(s)
❑ Chlorination ❑ Dechlorination ❑ Other components:. Click here to enter text.
® Self -Contained POD system [describe] AdvanTex Pod (integrated recirc. tank)
® Post Aeration (specify type) riprap at discharge
® Proposed Modifications to Existing Treatment System - Explain in detail the nature of the
modification. Attach all site maps, plans and specifications, signed by an NC Certified Engineer.
If prepared by others, plans must conform to 15A NCAC 02H .0139.
Install new septic tank. Replace failed subsurface system with AdvanTex AX20-RT-UV
Treatment Unit and discharge point with riprap.
❑ Proposed New Treatment System for Surface Discharge (not constructed) - Attach all site maps,
plans and specifications, to be signed by an NC Certified Engineer. If prepared by others, plans
must conform to 15A NCAC 02H .0139.
ExpandingFlo- Do ,you propose to increase permitted or existing flow? ❑ Yes ® No
Provide details of the Proposed NEW Discharge [Flow and Source Water]:
® Check if same as 6.
Existing: Amount of wastewater currently discharged: Number of bedrooms x 120
gallons per bedroom = gallons per day to be permitted (design flow)
Expanding: Amount of wastewater proposed to be discharged: Number of bedrooms x
120 gallons per bedroom = gallons per day to be permitted (design flow
10. Evaluate Alternatives to Discharge to Waters of the State. Please address the feasibility of
discharge alternatives as instructed in the NCDEQ Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA)
Guidance Document found here. (Note: Evaluation for endangered species is not required.)
a) Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System - Provide the
distance to the nearest connection, such as a regional or municipal sewer
system, and the estimated cost per foot to connect including fees. Distance
likel-v around $ miles or more. Exceeding $4 224 000 to connect.
Page 3 of 6 Revised- A. Orlando NPDES Mep12017
9 of 131

Application for Certificate of Coverage (COC) and/or Authorization to Construct (ATC)
under General -Pe rm it NCG550000
b) Land Application — Assess the land application disposal alternatives such as
spray irrigation, drip irrigation, individual/community onsite subsurface
systems, and/or innovative ground -absorption. Questions to consider:
(1) Are on -site soils suitable for land application? Yes ❑
(2) Is there sufficient area on -site?
Yes ❑
c) Wastewater Reuse— Evaluate reusing all or a portion of the wastewater
generated, such as for golf course irrigation, crop irrigation (e.g., hardwood
or pine plantation, grasses), athletic field irrigation, landscape uses, and/or
commercial/industrial uses. Not feasible
d) On -Site Soil Evaluation — Submit an evaluation of the soils on -site,
documented by a certified report from a NC Professional Soil Scientist, or
by your local or county health department report (if available). Not
sufficient suitable soil ors ace denial b_y county and evaluation by LSS
e) Cost of Alternatives — Provide an estimation of the cost of each discharge
alternative or combination of alternatives. Cost estimate included in EAA
11. Provide Regional Information: Please provide the following information. If you need assistance in
obtaining this information, please contact ,your local DE0 regional office.
a) Stream Classification -Verify the stream classification for the nearest downgradient named
waterbody. The NC Surface Water Classification map can be found by clicking here.
Horse Swamp — C; NSW
b) Is it a High -Quality Waterif so, check if it is by definition or by designation? In order to check
this, ask the Planning Unit. No
c) Map - Provide a map locating the nearest downstream waters -of -the -State (i.e. where the effluent
reaches an unnamed tributary, creek, stream, river, or lake via any surface -water conveyance).
See application package, discharge point on neighboring property (easement included) to
onsite stream.
d) Site Evaluation - Contact DBE[ ,'s local Regional Office for a site evaluation to confirm the
proposed discharge flow path to the nearest waters -of -the -State. The wastewater/stream
confluence and stream class must be verified in the field by DEQ's Regional Staff. Please list the
Regional Office staff member you contacted for the inspection. Morella Sanchez -King
e) Flow Path - Display graphically the flow path of the discharge to the nearest surface Waters of
the State. Document any potential hydrologic trespass or right-of-way infringement on any
neighboring property (i.e. note all properties encountered prior to reaching waters -of -the -State).
See application package, discharge point on neighboring property (easement included) to an
onsite stream.
f) 7010/3002 Estimate- Contact USGS J. Curtis Weaver (919-571-4043) to provide the estimated
7Q10 and 30Q2 stream -flow estimates for the first downstream point -of -contact with waters -of -
the -State. 7Q10 and 30Q2: zero flow
Page 4 of 6 Remised: A. Orlando NPDES 21Sept2017
10 of 131

Application for Certificate of Coverage (COC) and/or Authorization to Construct (ATC)
under General -Permit NCG550000
12. Certificates of C'overage/Notices or Intent to Discharge/Authorizations to Construct -Check ALL of
the follo%%ring information has been provided. Incomplete Applications will be returned.
® An original letter }two (2) copies) requesting coverage under NCG550000-
® This application Etwo (2) copiesl. Your signature on this application, certifies that you are iegily
responsible for the proposed treatment system (see page 6 of 6) for the COC/NOII ATC.
E A check or nioncy order for S60.00 permit fee made payable to NCDEQ.
13. .Additional Application Requirements
a) Narrative Description of the treatment system. This narrative should present treatment components
in order of flow - influent to outfall, including anti -erosion structures and sample -port location(s).
b) Final Plans and Specificatifor a wastewater treatment system shall be signed by a North
Carolina -registered Professional Engineer, or if prepared by others, must conform to 15A NCAC
02H .0�1 9� All documents are to be stamped "Final Design - Not Released for Construction"
Submittal shall include a site map showing the proposed outfall and the effluent proposed path to
surface waters -of -the -State. (see Item I for location verification by DWR Regional Office staff.)
c) Submittals by a Consulting Engineer or Engineering Firm shall include:
1. A copy of your written authorization to represent, signed by the legal
permit Applicant; and
2. Upon completion of proposed work, a signed copy of DWRs Engineer's
Certification form attesting that the project was completed in accord
with the DWR approved COC/ATC, as issued.
«�*«swrr+ray«•rs*s��rs�s*s**s********�s�**:******************r*•••***ass*s:�s*::*
CERTIFICATION
1 certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: Tony D'Amato Jr and Heidi L D'Amato
Title: Owners
(Please review i M b[CLAC 0211for definition of authorized signing officials)
April 20, 2d22
(Date signed)
Page S of Revised: .t. Orlando NPOES ?ISepJ2017
11 of 131

Application for Certificate of Coverage (COC) and/or Authorization to Construct (ATC)
under General -Permit NCG550000
NOTE: Treatment System Maintenance is Required - Upon receiving a Certificate of
Coverage/Authorization to Construct (COC/ATC), the Division recommends that the Permittee solicit
manufacturer -certified training, or solicit a qualified contractor or service to regularly inspect and
maintain this treatment system. The Permittee is responsible under this COC/ATC to maintain all
components of the approved treatment system, designed to meet Surface Water Quality Standards [see
attached Operation and Maintenance Agreement].
Compliance duties include:
• paying your annual fee [due on the anniversary of COC/ATC effective date],
■ following the manufacturer's guidelines,
• conducting and documenting inspections, in compliance with General Permit NCG550000,
■ establishing sources for OEM spare parts and supplies,
■ taking discharge samples for analysis, and logging the results,
■ making necessary repairs, documenting said maintenance in logs, and
■ keeping logs onsite for the life of the permit, available for DWR inspection.
North Carolina General statute § 143-215.6B provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any application, record,
report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this
Article; or who knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested
case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or
monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
Commission implementing this Article, shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not
to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine or
imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.
Application must be accompanied by a check or money order for $60.00
made payable to•
NCDEQ
f . •
Mail this application and one copy of the entire package (with check) to:
NCDEQ / DWR / NPDES
Attention: John Hennessy, Supervisor
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Attn: John Hennessy
Note: Submission of this document insures DWR's consideration, but does not
guarantee issuance of a Certificate of Coverage/Authorization to Construct.
Page 6 of 6 Revised: A. Orlando NPDES 21 Sepr2017
12 of 131

Attachment B
Documentation From Onslow County Environmental Health Department
13 of 131

Jon' Harrison
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 7.21 AM
To: Andrew Quirk
Cc: Jon Harrison
Subject: Comments for 1961 Rocky Run Rd., Jacksonville, Tony and Heidi D'Amato Property
Andrew,
After evaluating the property I'm unable to provide a recommendation to repair the
malfunctioning wastewater system on --site for the existing 3-bedroom residence. The Onslow
County Health Department is responsible for issuing a notice of violation (NOV) for this
site (if one hasn't already been issued) until the system is a legally permitted repair
system. All sewage discharge to the ground surface (i.e.
straight pipes, etc.) must be eliminated/maintained below the ground surface until a
permitted repair wastewater system is installed at the site. All sewage shall be routed
to the septic tank. Since a repair proposal cannot be offered, I have the following
option/recommendations for the property owner to investigate:
1. determine if perament pump -&-haul is an option (only available for sites classified as
"non -repairable" on -site) as permanent repair 2. property owner can locate additional
property (access through purchase and/or legal perpetual easement) and have evaluated by
your office to determine site suitability to place the repair nitrification field.
3. property owner to hire a licensed soil scientist (at their
expense) to investigate repair options and propose a repair wastewater system for the
site. All supporting documentation (site specific investigations, detailed site plan (to -
scale), etc.) to be submitted for review.
Tim Crissman, R.S.
Regional Soil Specialist
OSWW, DEH, NCDENR
14 of 131

North Carolina
Division of Environmental Health
i
Terry L. Pierce, Director
On Site Wastewater Section
ERVMn=nW Heam Andy Adams, Chief
May 1, 2006
Jon Harrison
Environmental Health Supervisor
Onslow County Health Department
612 College Street
Jacksonville, NC 28540
state 01voRlr Cerofma
Mirhaal F. Easley, Go"Mos
Department of Envimnment and
Naluref ROWUMSS
Wiliam G. Ross. secretary
RE: Comments for Tony and Heidi ❑'Amato Property located at 1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville,
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Harrison:
The Division of Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Section (OS WS) completed an evaluation at
the above referenced site to determine what repair options, if any, are available to repair the malfunctioning
wastewater system that serves a 3-bedroom single-family residence. Per your request the following "formal"
response is provided which contains the same continents provided in the memorandum sent via electronic mail
to your office on April 7, 2006.
After evaluating the property I'm unable to provide a recommendation to repair the malfunctioning
wastewater system on -site for the existing 3-bedroom residence. The Onslow County Health Department is
responsible for issuing a notice of violation (NOV) for this site (if one hasn't already been issued) until the
system is a legally permitted repair system. All sewage discharge to the ground surface (i,e, straight pipes, etc.)
must be eliminated/maintained below the ground surface until a permitted repair wastewater system is installed
at the site. All sewage shall be routed to the septic tank. Since a repair proposal cannot be offered, I have the
following option/recommendations for the property owner to investigate:
1. determine if perament pump -&-haul is an option (only available for sites classified as "non -repairable" on -
site) as permanent repair
2. property owner can locate additional property (access through purchase and/or legal perpetual easement) and
have evaluated by your office to determine site suitability to place the repair nitrification field.
3. property owner to hire a licensed soil scientist (at their expense) to investigate repair options and propose a
repair wastewater system for the site. All supporting documentation (site specific investigations, detailed site
plan (to -scale), etc.) to be submitted for review.
Ifyou have any questions, please d❑ not hesitate to contact me at 910-226-4010 or by electronic mail at
tim.crissman(a@ncmai l.net.
Sincerely,
Tim Crissman, R.S.
Regional Soil Specialist
15 of 131

.; 3;4SLOW COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
. �ArT1[SpNY1LL£. N. C.
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
I GROUND AS502PTION SYWA7E
01SP021AL SYSTEM--G.S. CHAP-
TER 130 ARTICLR t30 Q 5537
OWNER _ ..�L%�r �___��ill•lt.]IC1
Location -------------------- S.R. No._-W-_
------------------------------------------
S f 1)------------ Lot ---- Blk ____ Sec
Street___-__-______---------------------
LOT AREA ___---__..---------------------
Distance of Well: From Tank ______________
From Orainfield
Have tank and Drain Lines Inspected by a rep-
resentative of the Onslow County Health Center
before covering
Installed By _ 1 _ _ ,��h
Certificate of Co letion by
Date .._________-_
'THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTER
ONSLOW COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
3ACKSONVILLE. N. O.
APROVEMENTS PERMIT NQ 5537
(0901,40 AM&PTiOM 9LWAGE DISPoUL. STsT[w--
6. S. CHAPICA 130 ART L8 TSC)
�7 • F
OWNER _-- ,.,a�t WYK-,,
Location __L�'_ _ _--_�` _---. __ S.R. No.1 _
--------------------------------------------------------
SID ------------------- Lot ------- Blk _______ Sec -------
Street_--------------------------------------- -
MOUSE } MOBILE HOME [ ] BUSINESS ( )
NO. BEDROOMS ------- NO. BATHROOMS ----------
Percolation Test No. 1 ----------------- No. 2
Seasonal Water Table ________________,.________-___________
Soi€ Suitable _______.---M______���------------------- -
Other----------------------------------------------
Size of Septic Tank ---- 1_000- ------------------------ Gal.
Nitrification Lines __.___ sq. ft. __._- lin. F
Dist. Box to be Installed __ No. of lines
Water Supply: Approved _ �
T
N❑ pg -________
IMPROVEMENTS PERMIT BY __ _______
DATE
PERMIT VALID FOR ONE YEAR
16 of 131

17 of 131

Attachment C
Letter Requesting Coverage Under the General Permit
18 of 131

Z 1�
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Mr. John Hennessy
NPDES Permitting Program
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Letter Requesting Certificate of Coverage — D'Amato Property
1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546
Dear Mr. Hennessy;
April 20, 2022
Please consider this letter as a request for coverage under the General Permit for a Multi -
Phase Filter System. The proposed discharge system is for a 3-Bedroom Single Family
Residence (SFR) located in Dnslow County, North Carolina. The proposed discharge
system will replace an existing sub -surface system that serves the 3-bedroom residence.
The site has been deemed unsuitable for ground absorption sewage treatment systems by
the Dnslow County Environmental Health Department due to unsuitable soils. The
proposed system is to be sized for 3 bedrooms at 360 gallons/day. The residence is
located at 1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely;
Kevin D. Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering
19 of 131

Attachment D
Letter requesting Authorization to Construct
20 of 131

Z I �Z
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Mr. John Hennessy
NPDES Permitting Program
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Letter Requesting Authorization to Construct — D'Amato Property
1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546
Dear Mr. Hennessy;
April 20, 2022
Please consider this letter as a request for Authorization to Construct (AtC) a Multi -Phase
Filter System. The proposed discharge system is for a 3-Bedroom Single Family
Residence (SFR) located in Onslow County, North Carolina. The proposed discharge
system will replace an existing sub -surface system that serves the 3-bedroom residence.
The site has been deemed unsuitable for ground absorption sewage treatment systems by
the Onslow County Environmental Health Department due to unsuitable soils. The
proposed system is to be sized for 3 bedrooms at 360 gallons/day. The residence is
located at 1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely;
Kevin D. Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering
21 of 131

Attachment E
Soil Evaluation
22 of 131

Alisha Hudson
From:
Kevin Davidson
Sent:
Monday, January 17, 2022 3:45 PM
To:
Alisha Hudson
Subject:
FW: 1961 Rocky Run Road additional information
Attachments:
1961 Rocky Run Septic Documents.pdf
From: Howell, Nicholas <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 20214:01 PM
To: Kevin Davidson <[e-mail]>
Subject: Fwd: 1961 Rocky Run Road additional information
Kevin,
Thank you for taking my call the other day, below is email correspondence between my client and I on my findings at
their property located at 1961 Rocky Run Road in Jacksonville, Onslow County, NC. As discussed I was unable to locate
any area of the property that appeared to meet the criteria for repair. What are the next steps in moving forward with
the direct discharge permit process? I told them I wanted to make sure to get with you as discussed so when I write my
official report it will be fluid with that application submittal. Let me know what you need me to consider when writing
my official denial letter of the property for septic repair options. The client contact is in the email chain below and they
would like to know more about this process, they seemed open to the idea but would like to know more
information. Attached is the package of documentation from the HD and Pittman on past review.
Regards,
Nicholas "Nick" P. Howell I NC Licensed Soil Scientist #1294
Certified Professional Soil Scientist #328892 1 South Carolina
Professional Soil Classifier #113
Office: 452-0001 x 1910 1 Fax: [phone] Cell: 910.471.0505
Email: [e-mail] 1 Website: www.lmgroup.net
Land Management Group A Davey Company I Environmental Consultants
3805 Wrightsville Ave I Suite 15 1 Wilmington, NC 28403
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Howell, Nicholas [nhowell @ Im rou p.nets
Date: Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: 1961 Rocky Run Road additional information
To: Jennie Joe Samundsen tremaxres m3 outlook.com>
Cc: Shannon Bradley <[e-mail]>, damato_h <damato [e-mail]>, [e-mail]
<tony. d a m ato@ hotma i 1. comp
23 of 131

All,
I reviewed the property and septic system area at 1961 Rocky Run Road today. I looked specifically at the area proposed
by the other consulting firm for the potential repair area for the currently malfunctioning septic system. I also looked at
other portions of the property for alternative options.
The soils within the entirety of the property appeared to be a minor ridge landscape that falls from Rocky Run Road into
the moderate drain valley on the rear of the property. The current septic tank is in the front of the home which feeds to
at least 3 lines that were located. Those lines are in material that does not meet the current rules for onsite wastewater
treatment and according to the current tenants has issues getting water into the system during peak rainfall. The lines
appeared to be submerged or partially intersecting ground water during the site visit today. Also A line was noted
coming from the garage downslope of the home which smelled of laundry effluent. It appears the laundry discharges
directly from the machine though this line and is discharging at the ground surface at the base of the hill behind the
home.
The remainder of the lot were soils that were not suitable for onsite wastewater system design due to shallow soil
wetness condition, pressence of unsuitable fill and/or unsuitable landscape positions.
The area proposed for the septic field repair by the previous consultant was a minor side slope of the upper ridge that
would meet suitable landscape and was the most likely area to review for the proposed repair. The proposal was to
utilize pretreatment to drip irrigation with sand back filled trenches down to 4 feet and have an upslope interceptor
drain with a down slope curtain drain to impose drainage and intercept lateral water movement away from the
system. LMG excavated multiple soil profiles to view the soil media to see if this was a passibility under the 15A NC
AC 18A .1900 et. al. subsurface wastewater rules.
LMG did not find a contiguous area that appeared to meet the criteria set fourth by the design. A large portion of the
area did not have a coarse layer within 4 feet of the soil surface that is required for the sand backfill modification. Two
borings in this area were excavated to a depth of 6-7 feet and the material had too much clay to meet the "receiving"
layer criteria set forth by rule .1956(7)(vi) that must be a texture of sandy loam or coarser material for a depth of 2
feet.
The remaining soils downslope were in a concave landscape position and were of similar material make up. Due to
inadequate space of material that meets the requirements fo Rule .1956(7) for sand backfill trenches and poor
landscape positions in other portions of the site. I must conclude there are no apparent options for repairing this septic
system on this site.
1 can make an official report of these findings at your request. You have a few feasible options given what was provided
by the state review back in 2006. One is to seek permanent pump and haul, which is not very feasible from a financial
standpoint. The other is to locate an offsite area nearby, there may be better material across Rocky Run Road; however,
it is under private ownership and may not be available and it may be difficult to obtain permission to horizontal bore
under the road should sufficient soils be available and accessible. The only other option is to seek a direct discharge
permit through the state, We do not process that type of permit and I would suggest contacting Agri -Waste
Technologies out of Raleigh. i have been in contact with them about this site already and they are familiar with this
process. I spoke with Kevin Davidson about this (919-623-3538), there are certain criteria that are required for this type
of permit which i believe your site may meet, they are the experts on it as it is not something that is typically done but
can be done on specific sites that do not meet repair requirements. You can contact them and speck about this further
if you want. They would need for me to write an offiial report that denies the site for any and all options to be able to
process this permit request with the regulatory agencies. It would still require a pretreatment system much as was
proposed previously; however, it would simply discharge to the ditch in the rear of the property rather than go to a
dispersal field on the side yard.
PA
24 of 131

I know this is not what you want to hear about your site and I truly wish I had better news. My only other consolation is
to get back with Pittman and see if he will process his previous proposal, I do not agree that it is a good idea since the
soils do not meet the requirements.
Regards,
Nicholas "Nick" P. Howell I NC Licensed Soil Scientist #1294
Certified Professional Soil Scientist #328892 1 South Carolina
Professional Soil Classifier #113
Office: 452-0001 x 1910 1 Fax: [phone] Cell: 910.471.0505
Email: nhowell0meroup.net I Website: www.fmgroupnet
Land Management Group A Davey CompanvI Environmental Consultants
3805 Wrightsville Ave I Suite 15 1 Wilmington, NC 28403
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:13 PM Jennie Joe Samundsen <remaxres m3 outlook.com> wrote:
Okay, thank you. Please keep us updated.
Please respond to this email with any questions or concerns. We may be working virtually. Email or text is
the best form of communication at this time.
Jennie Joe Samundsen
RE/MAST Elite Property Management
910.333.0124
www.ergrents.com
RIi
REIM AX*
r�
From: Howell, Nicholas rnhowell Im rou .nets
Sent: Monday, August 23, 20219:05 AM
To: Jennie Joe Samundsen <remaxres [e-mail]>
Cc: Shannon Bradley <sbradley@lm_group.net>; damato_h <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
stony. d a m ato@ hotm a i l.com a
Subject: Re: 1961 Rocky Run Road additional information
10-4. 1 will see what I can see is a possibility.
25 of 131

Attachment F
1. Correspondence from USGS
Z. Stream Classification
26 of 131

7Q1 D and 30Q2 Flow Request Damato
Region ID: NC
Workspace ID: NC20220323155633776000
Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude): 34.76848,-77.27315
Time: 2022-03-23 11:56:53 -0400
6nsite Wastewater Design. Location points to Sheep Pen Branch {waterway in back yard}.
Basin Characteristics
Parameter
Code
Parameter Description
Value
Unit
DRNAREA
Area that drains to a paint on a stream
0.27
square
miles
PCTREGI
Percentage of drainage area located in Region 1 - Piedmont 1
0
percent
Ridge and Valley
PCTRE62
Percentage of drainage area located in Region 2 - Blue Ridge
0
percent
PCTREG3
Percentage of drainage area located in Region 3 - Sandhills
0
percent
27 of 131

Parameter
Code
Parameter Description
Value
Unit
PCTREG4
Percentage of drainage area located in Region 4 - Coastal
100
percent
Plains
PCTREG5
Percentage of drainage area located in Region 5 - Lower
0
percent
Tifton Uplands
LC051MP
Percentage of impervious area determined from NLCD 2006
0.69
percent
impervious dataset
124H50Y
Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average once
9,95
inches
in 50 years
USGS Data Disclaimer. Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality
standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have
been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty
expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor
shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
USGS Software Disclaimer: This software has been approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Although the
software has been subjected to rigorous review, the USGS reserves the right to update the software as needed pursuant to
further analysis and review. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS or the U.S. Government as to the
functionality of the software and related material nor shall the fact of release constitute any such warranty. Furthermore, the
software is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages
resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.
USGS Product Names Disclaimer: Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not
imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Application Version: 4.7.0
StreamStats Services Version: 1.2.22
NISS Services Version: 2.1.2
28 of 131

Alisha Hudson
From: Travis Sexton
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 10:04 AM
To: Alisha Hudson
Subject: Fw: USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request # 2022-182 (dated 2022/03/25)
for UT Little Northeast Creek Onslow County... RE: [EXTERNAL] Low -flow request
approval
I hope this gets you what you need for the ❑'arnato project.
From: Julie Davidson <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 3:34 PM
To: Travis Sexton <[e-mail]>
Subject: Fwd. USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request 4 2022-182 (dated 2022/03/25) for UT Little Northeast
Creek Onslow County...RE: [EXTERNAL] Low -flow request approval
I think this is yours
Julie Davidson
Sr. GIS Analyst
Cell: 919.971.2326
Office: 919.376.6315
From: Weaver, John C <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 10:20:29 AM
To: Julie Davidson <jdavid [e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Montebello, Michael J
[e-mail]>; Dowden, Doug <[e-mail]>; Albert in, Klaus P
<[e-mail]>; Weaver, John C <[e-mail]>
Subject: USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request # 2022-182 (dated 2022/03/25) for UT Little Northeast Creek
Onslow County...RE: [EXTERNAL] Low -flow request approval
Ms. Davidson,
In response to your inquiry about the low -flow characteristics for a location on an unnamed tributary to Little Northeast
Creek near the intersection of NC Secondary Road 1423 (Old 30 Road) and NC Secondary Road 1413 (Rocky Run Road) in
the vicinity of Jacksonville in eastern Onslow County, the following information is provided:
For the record: Information provided as part of the request submission identified the stream of interest as being Sheep
Pen Branch. Inspection of the applicable USGS topographical map did not confirm this stream name.
A check of the low -flow files here at the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC, Raleigh office) does not
indicate low -flow estimates previously determined for the point of interest, identified by the lat/long coordinates
(34.76848,-77.27315) provided via email dated 03/25/2022 from the DWR USGS Low Flows portal fallowing your
request submission.
No USGS discharge records are known to exist for the point of interest.
29 of 131

In the absence of site -specific discharge records sufficient for a low -flow analysis, estimates of low -flow characteristics at
ungaged locations are determined by assessing a range in the low -flaw yields (expressed as flow per square
mile drainage area, or cfsm) at nearby sites where estimates have previously been determined.
A basin delineation completed using the online USGS Stream5tats application for North Carolina
(https:llstreamstats.usgs.gov/s.s ) indicates the drainage area for the point of interest (Stream5tats adjusted
coordinates 34.76848,-77.27314 NAQ83) is 0.27 sgmi, which confirms the drainage area submitted as part of the
request information.
For streams in central and eastern Onslow County, low -flow characteristics published by the USGS are provided in the
following reports:
(1) The first is a statewide report completed in the early 1990's. It is USGS Water -Supply Paper 2403, "Low -flow
characteristics of streams in North Carolina" (Giese and Mason, 1993). An online version of the report is available at
httP:llpubs.tisgs.govlwsP/2403/report.pdf. The report provides the low -flow characteristics (based on data through
1988) via regional relations and at -site values for sites with drainage basins between 1 and 400 sgmi and not considered
or known to be affected by regulation and/or diversions.
(2) The second is a statewide report published in March 2015. It is USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2015-5001,
"Low -flow characteristics and flow -duration statistics for selected USGS continuous -record streamgaging stations in
North Carolina through 2012" (Weaver, 2015). The report is available online at
httpjlpubs.usgs.gov/sir/201515001/. The report provides updated low -flow characteristics and flow -duration statistics
for 266 active (as of 2012 water year) and discontinued streamgages across the state where a minimum of 10 climatic
years discharge records were available for flow analyses.
Low -flow characteristics estimated for point of interest:
Please note: There are very limited streamf low records for basins in Ons low County.
Inspection of the above reports indicates the presence of six (6) nearby selected USGS partial -record sites (5) and
continuous -record streamgages (1) across Onslow County and parts of adjacent counties in broad general vicinity of the
point of interest where low -flow characteristics were published. Among these 6 index sites, the low -flow discharge
yields for the indicated flow statistics are as follows:
Annual 7Q10 low -flow yields =_> from 0 to 0.017 cfsm (average about 0.0071 cfsm, median about 0.0052 cfsm) (zero
flow at 2 of 6 index sites)
Annual 30QZ low -flow yields =_> from 0 to 0.16 cfsm (average about 0.06 cfsm, median about 0.038 cfsm) (zero flow at
I of 6 index sites)
Winter 7Q10 low -flow yields =_> from 0 to 0.086 cfsm (average about 0.027 cfsm, median about 0.01 cfsm) (zero flow of
2 of 6 index sites)
Annual 7Q2 low -flow yields =_> from 0 to 0.066 cfsm (average about 0.027 cfsm, median about 0.02 cfsm) (zero flow at
2 of 6 index sites)
Average annual discharge yields =_> from 1.3 to 1.5 cfsm (both average and median about 1.4 cfsm)
Application of the above range in yields to the drainage area (0.27 sgmi) for the point of interest results in the following
estimated low -flow discharges:
Annual 7Q10 low -flow discharges =_> from 0 to 0.0046 cfs (average about 0.0019 cfs, median about 0.0014 cfs)
(rounded down to zero flow)
Annual 30Q2 low -flow discharges =_> from 0 to 0.043 cfs (average about 0.016 cfs, median about 0.01 cfs) (rounded
down to zero flow)
30 of 131

Winter 7Q10 low -flow discharges =_> from 0 to 0.023 cfs (average about 0.0073 cfs, median about 0.0027 cfs) (rounded
down to zero flow)
Annual 7Q2 low -flow discharges =_> from 0 to 0.018 cfs (average about 0.0073 cfs, median about 0.0054 cfs) (rounded
down to zero flow)
Average annual discharge discharges =_> from 0.35 to 0.41 cfs (both average and median about 0.38 cfs)
Please note:
(1) The estimated flows are provided in units of cubic feet per second (cfs).
(2) The low -flow yields provided above are rounded to 2 significant figures. Estimated low -flow discharges less than 1
cfs are rounded to 2 significant figures. If between 1 and 100 cfs, then rounded to 1 decimal place; if greater than 100,
then rounded to the nearest whole number (zero decimal places).
(3) The information provided in this message is based on a preliminary assessment and considered provisional, subject
to revision pending collection of future data and further analyses.
These provisional streamflow statistics are provided via the DWR USGS Low Flows cooperative agreement between
the USGS and the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources.
Hope this information is helpful.
Thank you.
Curtis Weaver
J. Curtis Weaver, Hydrologist, PE Emalh &weaver6u1gs.gay
USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center Online. httos://www.y$gs.gQylcentersls.arsxa#er
North Carolina - South Carolina - Georgia
39I6 Sunset Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone. [phone] // Fax: [phone]
From: Albertin, Klaus P <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 7:16 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Albertin, (Claus P <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Weaver, John C <[e-mail]>;
Montebello, Michael 1 <[e-mail]>; Dowden, Doug <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Low -flow request approval
......... _
I This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding.
Your request has been approved and will be forwarded to USGS. A response from USGS usually takes 7 -10 business
days.
Request Flow Statistic Approval
31 of 131

Request ID: 182
Requestor: Julie Davidson
Requestor e-mail: [e-mail]
Requestor Phone: [phone]
Local Government:
Public Water Supply:
Consultant: Agriwaste Technology
Contact: Julie Davidson
Reason: Permit
River/Stream: Sheep Pen Branch
Drainage Area (sq. mi.): 0.27
Latitude: 34.76848
Longitude:-77.27315
Other Information: I have emailed an attachment of Stream 5tat Report to the link included in this request.
Statist istics: ["7Q1011," 30Q2" j
Approved by: Albertin, Klaus P
32 of 131

NC Surface Water Classification
K'R'Dlu+! lih:Ok Lh
ed Surface Water Classifications:
�!
Stream Index:
19-15-2-1
Stream Name:
Horse Swamp
n
Description:
From source to Little
Northeast Creek
N
e
Classification:
QNSW
�9Fc 7 erns ,ter° L,-.
Date of Class.:
July 31 1991
t+
What does this
More info
;.
Class. mean^
�.+
Rimer Basin:
White flak
41 kw. Rd
2oom to
1012112021, 3:58.31 PM
— Surface Water Onsif edons
O
n �Ifr R3
1:18,056
0 0.17 0.35 0.7 TnI
,.. " , . N ¢
0 0.28 tl-55 1.1 krn
S Xft of MOM CWUNM OCT. Earl, HERE. GGrmin. INCREMENT P.
USGS. METINASk EPIC USDA
NCDENR Div. Vvvw Pasoumes
Slap d NOM CMD&W DDT. EM. HERE. Giinrh INCREMENT P. USGS. METIMASA, EPA, USDA I NCDENR - DM sion of W&W Rewwm I
33 of 131

Attachment G
1. Flow Path to "Blue Line" Water Feature
2. Signed Easement
34 of 131

tea}.- - 4 _�.ti�! :.fir' # _'_ �,_� " `Y r •� y +`r - r �. • , �
-die■ f ! �. +] i
4141
y? i

September 22, 2021
GoMaps
nrd 3.R. Qd
ME.,DOWFI
4nr �A t yti •.�.
'Q
�r r
►per � f��- �� :`i ,,fly ��
IN
W E
L S
1:9,028
0 0.075 0.15 0-3 mi
0 OA 0-2 0-4 krn
U.S Fish and wildlife Service, National sundards and Support ream.
vmlands_WrrGlws-goy
Sources: Esn, HERE, Germin, USGS, Inlarmap, INCREMENT P. NRCan, Earl
Japan WTl, Esn Ch na{Hong Kong}, Esn 1(orae, Esh{Tho land), NGCC, [c]
36 Vrl 31

DRAINAGE EASEMENT
Prepared By Tony D'Amato Jr and W ifc, l Ieidi L D'Amato
1961 Rocky Run Road. lacksonville. NC 28546
This DRAINAGE EASEMENT, made this the 215t'day of M AI. 2022 is
hereby given by SANDRA G KING (Owner 926 Old 30 Road, PIN: 531700851166j.
hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR, and the party hereto grants the following Drainage
Easement to the owner of 1961 Rocky Run Road. PIN: 531700855069 hereinafter
referred to as GRANTEE;
IVITNESSF.TII.
WHEREAS, the GRANTOR listed af)ore o►►ns 926 Old 30 Road. as sho►►n on a
plat duly recorded in Deed Book 4981. lked Page 512-513. Onslo►► County Registry,
State of North Carolina:
NOW, THEREFORE, for goad and valuable consideration, receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1) Description of Grant of Easement -Appurtenant: Hie GRANTOR does hereby
give. grant, quitclaim, and convey unto the GRANTEE. its successors and assigns, a
perpetual casement with the right to erect. construct, install, and prepare and thereafter
use, operate, maintain, inspect, repair. replace, and improve the treated effluent discharge
line (or flow path) of a sewage disposal systems over and across the l:aseinent Area on the
following land owned by the GRANTOR. This Easement Area originates at the drainage
culvert located on the property line and crosses the subject property to nutlet into Sheep
Pen 13mrich.
Page I of 3
37 of 131

) 1Iaintenance: lach party hereto is responsible for maintaining the casement area as
required by applicable law.
3) No Obstructions: 'l he casement area .hall not be obstructed in all manner that ►►ill
impair or impede the llo►► of draining ►►atcrs over and through the casement area.
4) Indemnity: Each party hereto will indemnify. defend, and hold harmless the other for,
From. and against any and all claims suffered or incurred in connection with any alleged
bodily injury or property damage arising out of use or enjoyment of the Easement Areas,
unless caused by negligence or willful misconduct.
S) Successors and Assigns: l'his casement shall be binding on the successors and assigns
of the current owners, and this casement shall run with the land until terminated by a
►►rising cxecuw d by the then current owners of Said tract% and recorded of record.
b) Antendment: 'iliis casement shall he amended only by a written and recorded
instrument signed by each party hereto or the then current ow ner of the Property and the
Easement.
7) Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed and construed pursuant to the
laws of the State of North Carolina without regard to principles of conflict of laws,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have set their hands and seals- of
the day and the date first w ritten above.
Itirgnurure Pages un(I.Vorurres to.jnlhrtr an selru xis sincrs a nached herern]
Page ? ot' 3
38 of 131

San�.. � (SEAL)
dra G. King
STATE: OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF 0 to 31oW
I certify that the following person(s) personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged to me that he or she voluntarily signed the foregoing document(s) for the
purpose stated therein and in the capacity indicated:
Name of Principals: Sandra G. King
Date: 30-51zZ
My Comm, Expires:
14 �,2-q�Z3
Notary Public
_Ali sV\ ,2-. and Sol,
Printed Name of Notary Public
(N.P. SEAL)
39 of 131

Attachment H
Information on Connection to a Regional Sewer System
40 of 131

Alisha Hudson
From: Wally Hansen <[e-mail]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2022 8:01 AM
To: Alisha Hudson
Subject: Re: Sewer Availability Request
Good morning Alisha. The City does not have sewer on Rocky Run Road at all nor anywhere near the address you
provided. That address is well beyond our City Limits so we do not serve that area with any type of service.
Thanks
Wally
On Apr 14, 2022, at 4:33 PM, Alisha Hudson <[e-mail]> wrote:
You don't often get email from [e-mail], Learn why this is iml2ortant
WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization, Do not dick links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
and know the content Is safe.
Hey Wally,
I emailed you previously regarding a sewer availability request for the property located at 1961 Rocky
Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546.
We had several hold ups with this project and are now finalizing the application package.
As a part of that, I need to know the approximate distance to the nearest sewer location.
Thank you so much for your time and assistance.
Have a wonderful day and great weekend!
Best Regards,
Alisha R. Hudson, E.I.
Assistant Project Engineer
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. (AWT)
Office: (919) 859-06691 direct: [phone]
501 N Salem Street, Suite 203 Apex, NC 27502
From: Wally Hansen <[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, November 1, 20212:01 PM
To: Alisha Hudson <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Sewer Availability Request
Good afternoon Alisha. The City of Jacksonville does not currently provide sewer service to this area nor
do we have plans to serve this area in the next 5 years.
41 of 131

Thanks,
Wally Hansen
Public Services Director
City of Jacksonville, NC
[phone]
From: Alisha Hudson [maiito:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 1:55 PM
To: Wally Hansen <[e-mail]>
Subject: Sewer Availability Request
WARNING: This emalI odglnated from outside of the organization. Do not dick IInks or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
and know the content is safe.
Good Afternoon Wally,
Hope you are having a wonderful Monday)
I have a sewer availability request for the property located at 1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC
28546.
Can you please let me know the approximate distance to the nearest sewer location, as well as if there
are any plans for sewer line expansion towards the property in the next 5 years.
Thank you so much for your time and assistance)
Best Regards,
Alisha R Hudson, E.I.
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. (A WT)
Office [phone] E Direct: [phone]
501 N Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, NC 27502
42 of 131

Attachment I
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
43 of 131

Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
D'Amato Property
1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Onslow County
Date: April 20, 2022
Design Engineer: Kevin D. Davidson, P.E.
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, NC 27502
Office: 919-859-0669
Direct: 919-747-2306
44 of 131

Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
STEP 1. Determine if the proposed discharge will be allowed
Non -municipal applicants.
Due to staff constraints, the NPDES Unit cannot prepare speculative limits for non -municipal applicants.
Thus, it is your responsibility to make your own determination as to whether the proposed discharge might be
allowed by the Division, by evaluating the water quality factors listed above. It is highly recommended that
you discuss the proposed discharge with the applicable DWR Regional office and/or NPDES Unit staff, who
may be able to provide input on the likelihood of a new/expanding discharge. As a first step, you must
obtain streamflow estimates for the proposed discharge location to ensure that the receiving stream is not
subject to zero flow restrictions. Low flow data (specifically, drainage area, the summer and winter 7QI0,
average flow and 30Q2 flow statistics) can be obtained for a nominal fee from the U.S. Geological Survey in
Raleigh at 919-571-4000. The low flow data must be submitted with the EAA, and will be used by the permit
writer to develop permit limits. You must also verify that the proposed action (i.e., construction of a
wastewater treatment plant and its appurtenances) is consistent with local zoning and/or subdivision
ordinances. You will need to request the local government(s) to complete a Local Government Review Form
(Attachment A), and include the signed and notarized form with your NPDES application package.
Response: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) was contacted to determine the 7Q10 and 30Q2 flow estimates for
the downstream tributary of the proposed wastewater discharge point. The proposed discharge point is in Sheep
Pen Branch, a tributary of Horse Swamp. The analysis from USGS indicates the 7Q10 discharge for the point in
question is zero and the 30Q2 for the discharge point is zero (Anachmenr F of opplicadon package).
All applicants.
If you conclude that the proposed discharge will pass the "allowable discharge" criteria, then begin the EAA
preparation by summarizing the following general information about the proposed project:
■ Provide a description of the proposed project. If the project will be constructed in phases, provide a
schedule for constructing each additional phase, and provide the projected flow per phase (see STEP 2).
Response. A wastewater discharge system is to be constructed for a 3-Bedroom Single Family Residence (SFR) located in
Onslow County, North Carolina. The proposed system will replace a failing sub -surface system that currently
serves the residence. The proposed discharge point is in a waterway named Sheep Pen Branch located beyond the
northwest property line on the neighboring property owned by Sandra G. King. The proposed treatment system
will utilize the following components:
Septic Tank with Effluent Filter (existing tank to be abandoned)
AdvanTex AX-20 RT Pod
Recirculation Pump Chamber (Integrated into AdvanTex Pod System)
UV Disinfection
- Discharge Point with Rip -Rap
Construction of the proposed system will occur in a single phase with an anticipated completion time of
approximately 2 weeks after the start of construction activity.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page I of 8
45 of 131

Applicant Information:
Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Contact Person:
Facility Information:
Name:
Address:
County:
Phone Number:
Contact Person:
EAA Preparer's Information:
Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Contact Person:
Tony and Heidi D' Amato
41649 Elk Run Dr
Murrieta, CA 92562
910-650-1591
Tony D' Amato
❑' Amato Property
1961 Rocky Run Rd
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Onslow
910-650-1591
Tony D' Amato
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street
Apex, NC 27502
919-859-0669
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
STEP 2. Provide reasonable projections for population and flow
Residential Population Projections.
Facilities requesting an NPDES discharge permit for new or expanding domestic wastewater discharges
must document the population to be served within the service area over a 20-year planning period. The NC
State Demographics unit provides population data for each county and municipality and can be accessed on
the Internet at http://www.demog.state.nc.us. If 20-year population projections for specific areas are not
available, a linear extrapolation of population trends from the past decade should be used. Any deviation
from a linear projection method must be clearly justified. If population projections include future
annexations, include a proposed annexation schedule as well as any annexation requirements that must be
met.
Response: Because the wastewater treatment system is designed for a single-family residence, the population to be served
will be limited by the number of bedrooms at the individual residence. The existing house contains 3 bedrooms.
For the 20-year planning period, the system will be designed for a 3-bedroom residence with a flow of 360
gallons per day. At 2 people per bedroom, the system will be designed to serve 6 residents.
STEP 3. Evaluate technologically feasible alternatives
Alternative A. Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System.
You must evaluate the feasibility of connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system served by a
municipality or other entity holding a valid NPDES or Non -Discharge Permit. All connection options
should include an evaluation of a gravity line and/or force main with pump station(s).
1. Existing Sewerage System:
(a) Identify whether there are existing sewer lines within a five -mile radius, or consider a greater
radius if cost effective for the project size.
Response: Connection to a sewer collection system is likely not feasible for this property. Wally Hansen, Public Services
Director for the City of Jacksonville, NC, indicated that the sewer is not currently available for the applicant's
property and there are currently no plans to extend the sewer at this time. Mr. Hansen also specified that the
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 2 of 8
46 of 131

property is well beyond the city limits and there is no sewer service anywhere near the property (Attachment H).
This would indicate that the closest sewer system would be within the Jackson viIle city limits, in excess of 8
miles from the property. For reference, if an installation cost of $100/ft of installed sewer line was assumed, the
cost to connect this property to the sewer line would exceed $4,224,000, Additional costs including the cost of
the pump station, potential "tap" or sewer capital fees, road repair costs, frontage fees and fees for right of way
permits would also be incurred by the homeowner.
(b) Provide a preliminary indication of flow acceptance from existing municipal or private
WWTPs under consideration for connection. If a municipal or private WWTP cannot accept
the wastewater, include a letter documenting such and consider this alternative
technologically infeasible.
Response. N/A No sewerage available
(c) If an existing sewerage system will accept the wastewater, evaluate the
piping/pumps/resources necessary to connect to the existing wastewater treatment plant.
Attach a topographic map or a site drawing showing the physical route of this alternative.
Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4.
Response: N/A No sewerage available
2. Planned Sewerage System: Determine if a regional sewerage system within a five mile radius is
projected to be available within the next five years to receive waste from the project site. If
applicable, determine availability date and flow acceptance projection from appropriate
authority.
Response: No plans to extend their coverage area toward the applicant are known of at this time.
Alternative B. Land Application.
Land application disposal alternatives include individual/community onsite subsurface systems, drip
irrigation, and spray irrigation.
1. Provide an estimate of the best case hydraulic loading rate based on County Soil Surveys or from
a soil evaluation performed by a soil scientist. Include calculations showing the hydraulic
loading rate and the total area of land needed for the land disposal system, including buffers.
Response. The Onslow County Health Department indicated that the site is unsuitable for installation of a ground
absorption septic system in a letter dated March 1, 2006 (Attachment B of application package). The letter
indicated that a permit cannot be issued due to unsuitable soil characteristics and insufficient space.
Per the soil evaluation by Nicholas Howell, L.S.S., the site does not have suitable soil or space to accommodate a
ground absorption or surface drip or surface spray wastewater system (Attachmeni E of application package).
Regardless of the fact that a subsurface ground absorption cannot be designed or permitted for this site, the
potential size of a subsurface system has been estimated. According to the web soil survey, the site is classified
as an Onslow loamy fine sand (On). For a subsurface system in this soil, a drip system with pretreatment would
be required. These soils would have a long-term acceptance rate (LTAR) ranging from 0.05-0.15 gpd/sq.ft., with
a typical rate of 0.1 gpd/sq.ft. Subsurface systems also require the drainline to be installed with the contour so
that each drainline is at a constant elevation. This results in a "fanning" of the drainline and requires additional
space in order to install the required amount of drainline. The sizing calculation is summarized in the table
below:
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 3 of S
47 of 131

Subsurface Dripfield Design Alternative
# Bedrooms 3
Daily Flow 360 gpd 120 gpd ' Ybedrooms
LTAR 0.1 gpd/sqft
Minimum Area Required (Nominal) 3,600 sqft = Owly Frosv/LTAR
Estimation for Topographical Variation 1,200 sqft
Estimated Area Required (Actual) 4,800 sgft
Approximate Area Available 8,398 sqft
The current property's land available for the system is 8,398 sqft, due to setbacks and existing site conditions.
A schematic of this area is shown in Appendix A of the EAA. The land needed for a subsurface dripfield
design is a minimum of 4,800 sq. ft., so there is sufficient space for this type of system at the residence.
Although there may be sufficient space, due to limitations caused by the soil characteristics and conditions,
this property is not suitable for a subsurface system.
The potential size of a non -discharge surface application system has also been estimated. According to the
web soil survey, the site is classified as a loamy fine sand. For a surface system in this soil, the SFR loading
rate group is likely restricted to a maximum annual loading of 19.5 in/year. The sizing calculation for a non -
discharge surface system is summarized in the table below:
Non -Discharge Surface Design Alternative
# Bedrooms 3
Daily Flow 360 gpd = 120 gpd ' #bedrooms
Surface Loading Rate 19.5 in/year
Minimum Area Required (Nominal)
Approximate Area Available
10,810 sqft
0 soft
The current property's land available for a surface drip or spray system is 0 sgfl, due to setbacks and existing site
conditions. The major limiting factors that prevent this type of system are the 100' stream setback, the 50'
property setback, and the location of the SFR as well as the 15' foundation setback. The potential for waving
property setbacks has been considered and would allow for 1,426 sqft. A schematic of this area is shown in
Appendix A. The land needed for a non -discharge application system is estimated at 10,810 sq. ft., so there is
insufficient space for this type of system at the residence.
2. Assess the availability of land. If insufficient ]land is available onsite, assume that the necessary
land can be purchased and estimate the land purchase cost based on local real estate prices.
Alternatively, provide documentation to demonstrate that insufficient land is available for sale in
the project area (include letters from adjacent property owners indicating no interest in selling
property).
Response. Because insufficient land is available onsite (due to inadequate soil and inadequate space), offshe land was
reviewed. The table below lists neighboring properties and the value of the land as listed by the Onslow
County GIS website. The values listed in the table do not reflect the value of the single-family residences.
The soil types listed for these properties are Onslow loamy fine sand (On) and Lynchburg fine sandy loam
(Ly). These sites, like the applicant's site, will be very restrictive for wastewater systems. Much of the listed
southern and western parcels are restricted for septic application by topography and unnamed tributaries of
Horse Swamp.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 4 of 8
48 of 131

Adjoining Property Values
Neighboring Property
Area Jac)
Vacant
Price of Land �$]
PIN 5317-85-5069 (Northeast)
0.49
N
22,050
PIN 5876-84-5295 (Southwest)
0.50
N
22,500
PIN 5876-84-7833 (Northwest)
8.88
N
51,940
PIN 5876-84-5295 (Southeast)
432.61
N
679,930
3. Provide a description of the wastewater treatment system and the non -discharge application
system. Include a site plan showing the proposed layout, the application area, any existing
structures, proposed structures, and other uses within the site.
Response. A typical subsurface drip system or a non -discharge surface spray or surface drip system with pretreatment
considers the following components:
- Septic Tank with Effluent Filter
- Recirculation Tank (Integrated in AX20-RT unit)
- AdvanTex Treatment Pod (AX20-RT unit)
- Pump Tank (potentially integrated in AX20-RT unit)
- UV Disinfection (Integrated in AX20-RT unit)
- Headworks Box
- Control Panel
- Disposal Field (drip or spray) with addition of fill soil
Note: The proposed discharge system does not consider the pump tank, headworks box or disposal field.
Site drawings of these alternative systems showing the available application area are included as Appendix A
of the EAA. Due to the cost requirements of a drip or spray system and the lack of sufficient soil, there is no
ability to consider any of these systems on this property.
4. Explain the proposed reuse plan if reclaimed water will be used by a third party.
Response. There is no reuse plan being considered either on -site or by a third party. The residential plumbing
infrastructure does not allow for reuse in the proposed residence. 11 is not feasible to consider using
reclaimed water on the site or becoming a bulk distributor of reclaimed water. The table below summarizes
the amount of reclaimed water that could be beneficially used on site. As shown in Appendix A, there is
sufficient area to utilize the daily flow of reclaimed water. Although there may be sufficient space, due to
limitations caused by the soil characteristics and conditions, this property is not suitable for on -site
utilization of reclaimed water. Regardless of the fact that the soil at this site is not suitable for this system,
installing this system would not be feasible due to costs.
On -site Utilization of Reclaimed Water
Daily flow through system 360 gpd
Available Area to Irrigate 12,764 sgft Veg. coveronpropoty
Application Rate 0.5 in/week *Fescue Grass
Acceptable Volume to Irrigate 532 ff/week
= 568 gpd
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page S of 8
49 of 131

5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4. For the reclaimed water system include the
potential revenue generated by selling the water.
Response. A Present Value Cost Analysis is included as Appendix B of the EAA. An analysis was performed for a
sub -surface drip system, a non -discharge surface application system, and a reclaimed water system. A
summary of the analysis is included in STEP 4.
6. Provide all calculations, documentation and maps as necessary to support assumptions and
conclusions.
Response: Calculations performed to evaluate land application alternatives are shown above in Alternative B, Points i
and 4.
7. Note: The design of land application systems must meet the treatment and design requirements
specified in 15A NCAC 2T .0500 or 15A NCAC 18A.1900.
Response: The treatment systems specified above in Step B would meet the treatment standards required by these rules
as they pertain to single family residences. However, due to the restrictions listed above, no land -based
systems can be considered.
S. Note: Proposed discharges from groundwater remediation systems must evaluate the potential
for an infiltration gallery treatment alternative.
Response: NIA
Alternative C. Wastewater Reuse.
You must evaluate reusing all or a portion of the wastewater generated. Some municipalities are currently
reusing wastewater within the confines of their WWTP property for irrigation, toilet flushing, backwashing,
etc., while other municipalities have established progressive reuse programs for residential irrigation. Reuse
applications might include golf course irrigation, crop irrigation (e.g., hardwood or pine plantation,
grasses), athletic field irrigation, landscape uses, and commercial/industrial uses. Some of these reuse
applications will be evaluated under Alternative B, Land Application. The design of reclaimed water
systems must meet the treatment and design requirements specified in 15A NCAC 2U.
Response: All reuse applications for this project scale were evaluated under Alternative B, Point 4. Wastewater reuse
was determined to be infeasible for this project.
Alternative D. Direct Discharge to Surface Waters.
1. No new or expanding (additional) discharge of oxygen -consuming waste will be allowed to
surface waters of North Carolina if both the summer 7Q1O and 3OQ2 streamflows are estimated
to be zero, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.02O6(d). Private applicants must contact the USGS
in Raleigh at 919-571-4000 and obtain (generally for a nominal fee), the receiving streamflow data
(s7Q10, 30Q2, annual average streamflow) at the proposed discharge location. This information
must be included in the EAA, and will be used to develop permit limits.
Response: Because the 30Q2 showed a zero flow at the discharge point, the discharge will he considered on a case -by -
case basis.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2O14
Page 6 of 8
50 of 131

2. All direct discharge systems of oxygen -consuming wastes should be evaluated both with tertiary
filtration [SODS= 5 mg/l, NH3-N= 1 mg/l] and without, and assuming a weekly sampling
regime.
Response: Tertiary filtration is not required under the general permit, as the general permit requirements (monthly
average) are BODs = 30 mgll and Total Suspended Solids = 30 mgll. However, based on actual sample
results from similar treatment systems (other facilities using the same technology) in many cases, a BODs of
5 mgll and NH3-N of I mgll can be met. While weekly sampling of the treated effluent would confirm the
treatment results on a regular basis, the additional cost associated with the collection and testing of the
effluent would not be feasible for the homeowner.
3. Provide a description of the proposed wastewater treatment facilities, including a schematic
diagram of the major components and a site plan of the treatment facility with outfall line(s).
Response: Plans and schematic drawings can be found in Attachment K (of application package).
4. Provide documentation of the availability of required land and/or easement agreements.
Response: NIA
5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4.
Response: A Present Value Cost Analysis for the discharge system is included in Appendix B. A summary of the
analysis is included in STEP 4.
6. Note: All direct discharge treatment systems must comply with Reliability Requirements
specified in 15A NCAC 2H.8124.
Response: The system serves a private facility that is served by city water and does not have elevated water storage
tanks. In the event of a power outage, water may still be available to the residence. There is storage
available in the system to hold some waste from the house until power is restored to the system.
Alternative E. Combination of Alternatives.
You should evaluate the possibility of a combination of wastewater alternatives that would minimize or
eliminate a direct discharge alternative. For example, consider whether the facility can operate a land
application system during the dry season when streamflows are at their lowest and provide less dilution, and
operate an NPDES discharge system during the wet season when soils may not be as amenable to land
application and the receiving stream provides its greatest dilution.
Response: A non -discharge alternative is not feasible due to the space and soil constraints listed in Alternative B. The
presence or absence of a seasonal high water table will not relieve the other constraints.
EAA Guidance Document Remmon: April 2014
Page 7 of 8
51 of 131

STEP 4. Evaluate economic feasibility of alternatives
PVCA Summary Table.
The EAA must include a Summary Cost Table, which summarizes present worth costs developed for all
technologically feasible wastewater alternatives. The summary should include a breakdown of capital costs
and recurring costs. In some situations, the Division may require the applicant to refine cost estimates for
some alternatives, or possibly collect actual soil data to better characterize the land application alternative.
Ultimately, the final determination on cost effectiveness is made by the Division with consideration of
monetary costs as well as potential environmental impacts.
Response: The following table presents the cost analysis for several types of wastewater systems. Given the
information presented above, the only technologically feasible alternative is the Discharge System. The
"Install Cost" includes the estimated cost to design and install the specific type of system. The installation
cost does not include the cost of fill soil that would likely need be added, at the direction of a L.S.S., to
maintain suitable soil depths within a drainfield. The "Present Value of Costs" is based on a discount factor
of 1.2°/6.
Cost Analysis for Three (3) Bedroom S F R
Present
Install
20 yr
Total Cost
Valua
Cost
Annual Cost
20 years
of Cosh
System Type
($)
($)
($)
($)
Sub -Surface System
$37,000
$24,534
$61,534
$58,482
Non -discharge System
$48,850
$21,444
$70,294
$67,631
Reclaimed System
$52,150
$23,753
S75,903
$72,959
Discharge System
$24.250
$17,417
$41,667
$39,495
EAA Guidance Document Recision: April 2014
Page 8 of 8
52 of 131

Appendix A. Site Maps
For
System Alternatives Analysis
- Subsurface System Option
- Non -Discharge System Option
- Reclaimed Water Option
53 of 131

N PF
}OSEPH HENOFRsoN
ID B. 434. pG. 586
0 25 50 ��~~
Fee!
AVAILABLE
_ BRANCH APPLICATION AREA
PEN
22,0 f
i '57'00�� 100.57'
` AREA = $,398 ft2
r
1 �
34 i
��y l
a , 36
WOO
}
38' }
} EXISTING _
} SYSTEM
} LOCATION f 1
r Bt-5a'
552'20��-W
NCSR1
ROCK sa R ROAD
w
Subsurface System Option
N/F
�pYGE HALE
p.8. 11 B8, PG. 530
0
AWT
Ergira arp Sell dclwMaaa
op
'Amato Residence
SulD-h rge
ftwttm to Tnakwt system
aw ra<n.aur
Fe W X W
416" pq P- W.
IMi4 M 1m6P
9,=
Aw
i Krw
Pill wixoftw
For
Review
Only
FW mmm
M mom
Altemative Oesi n
Subsurface Drip
eft
NEwm eE REYM A
A&D= W. F SLW pk
ORA)1►tC mwut
SE-1
54 *f 131

N /F
JosEFF#—HE DE S6ON
0.9. 434,
� a
a xs so
r'eet
_ AVAILABLE
APPLICATION AREA
EEPS PEN BRANCH --- -_
Bow
AREA = 1,426 ft2
1 1 t
I
l 34 f
1+n
`
0.
I SCREEI(➢ 3611 3
YtlkCH � N
� ' — � inn• ��- — -- -- -- -� � , o
l timom
E EXISTING / 33'
l
SYSTEM
LOCATION---
552'2�•OO�W g1,56`
NCSR� — — �J 1—
ROCKY RUN ROAD
60' RAW
Nan -Discharge System Option
N /F
jOYCE HALE
p3. 1188. PG. 530
A► JT
enpnv«• rw eai nwwm
q:rr.w r.ummw,.�
sm re srr„ sr.w. sw. m
+v�.rnrt cren. ersw
O'Amoto Residence
%,bE n. ii b-1 *de
0"
,IHYe
4. r ok 2W
�a
�+w 191
�»,ava�
Onm
h� y71]ppllipOp
For
Review
Only
fkk ow
�. �m
Wtemotive Design:
n—Discharge System
ra. 1,Syi
m ac �n nt
coon ar Ircuaao ac
k" 4AW ---
SE-Z
55 of 131

r
H' �aoa� �� BRANCH
AVAILABLE
_
spyp,,
EEPS
APPLICATION AREA
_
'57'Oa"E 1a0.57'
H
AREA = 12,764 W
N/F
34' 1
JOSEPH HENDERSON
I
D.B. 434, PG. 586
}�
❑
m °i
0l1
HOuse
I scaE[r,[a
36 r�
g N /r
i].B. 1188. PG. 5
EXISTING % 38
} SYSTEM —
`` LOCATION
• ssx'2a'aa'W gt-5�
—� NCjR� 1— -
ROCKY RUN ROAD
6a' R/w
Reclaimed Water Option
AVVT
E�rxa aM Swl Ecl«mala
w1N 5wn•wN� Nw� 1pa. Nunn Cr
9 l6]OA!!0 ri
O'kmft Residence
svd� DimM19.
Wcriewty r,e —q So-
0— t+m.ebr,
1W'"w crM
41M M P- p1N
fi,W 950-,591
F*. W-6ro .
,>w1
kc2WA
For
Review
Only
WAcc"
AternotNe Design
Reclaimed Water
* ft MWD me
4 Him 04/1 I/M
1xa e+: Aerx�a ac
EASE➢ Ht FaEkgD de
SE-3
56 of 131

Appendix B. Present Value Cost Analysis
For
System Alternatives Analysis
- Subsurface System Option
- Non -Discharge System Option
- Reclaimed Water Option
- Surface Discharge Option
57 of 131

Engineering Alternatives Analysis
PVCA Calculation
Coat An alysIs for Three (3) Bedroom S F R
Present
Install
20 yr
Total Cost
Value
Coat
Annual Cost
20 years
of Costa
System Type
M
i$1
M
M
Sub -Surface System
$37,000
$24,534
$61.534
$58,482
Non -Discharge System
$48.850
$21,444
$70.294
$57.631
Reclaimed System
$52.150
$23.753
$75.903
$72.969
Discharge System
$24,250
$17.417
$41.667
$39,495
Subsurface System
Co $37,000 Estimated Cost to Design and Install System
r 1.200%
C ,
{1 + r}'
PV $58,482 Present Value of Costs
Cost Summary Table
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee
Sample Coat
Pumping Cost UV Replacement Cost
C,
Total Ct PV
Increase s% every3
Yam
Increase 3%yearly
Increase sso every 5 Increase 3% yeeny
years
Annual Incurred
Costs (S)
Annual
Discounted Coat
(S)
Tolal 9iswunted Present VaWe
Costs [S) of Costs IS]
1 60 500
258
0 125
943
932
932 37 932
2 60
500
266
0
129
954
932
1,864
38.884
3 60
500
274
0
133
966
932
2,796
39.796
4 60
525
252
0
137
1,004
957
3,753
40,753
5 60
525
290
300
141
1,316
1,240
4,993
41,993
6 60
525
299
0
145
1,029
958
5,951
42,951
7 60
551
308
0
149
1.069
983
6,934
43,934
8 80
551
317
0
154
1,082
984
7.917
44,917
9 60
551
327
0
158
1.096
985
8.902
45,902
10 60
579
337
350
163
1.489
1.321
10,223
47,223
11 80
579
347
0
168
1,154
1.012
11,235
48,235
12 60
579
357
0
173
1,169
1,013
12,248
49,248
13 60
608
368
0
178
1,214
1,039
13,285
50,288
14 60
608
379
0
184
1,230
1,041
14,329
51,329
15 60
608
390
400
189
1,547
1,377
15,706
52,706
16 60
838
402
0
195
1,295
1,070
16,776
53.776
17 60
638
414
0
201
1,313
1,072
17,848
54.848
18 60
638
426
0
207
1,331
1,074
18.921
55,921
19 60
670
439
0
213
1.382
1,102
20.023
57,023
20 60
670
452
450
219
1.852
1,459
21.482
58.482
24.534
58 of 131

Non -Discharge System
Ca $48,850 Estimated Cost to Design and Install System
1.200%
PI = CV + C Cr
{1 + r]`
PV 567.631 Present Value of Casts
Cost Summary Table
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee
Sample Cost
Pumping Cost UV Replacement Cast
Ct
Total Ct
PV
Increase 5% every 3
years
Increase 3%yearly
lncrease $50 every 5 Increase 3% yearly
years
Annual lnWrred
Costs [S]
Annual
Orscounlw Cnsl
a)
Total pi5CQvnled
COSIS (s)
PreSenl Value
of CoSIS I$}
1 60 500
143
0 125
628
618
818
49,668
2 60
500
147
0
129
836
816
1,635
50.485
3 60
500
152
0
133
644
615
2,449
51,299
4 60
525
155
0
137
876
837
3.286
52,136
5 60
525
161
300
141
1,167
1.118
4,404
53,254
5 60
525
166
0
145
898
834
5.238
54,088
7 60
551
171
0
149
931
557
6.095
54,945
8 60
551
176
0
154
941
855
6,950
55.800
9 60
551
181
0
158
951
854
7.604
56,654
10 60
579
187
350
163
1.338
1,188
8,992
57.842
11 60
579
192
0
168
999
876
9,868
58,718
12 60
579
198
0
173
1,010
675
10,743
59.593
13 60
608
204
0
178
1,050
699
11,642
60.492
14 60
608
210
0
184
1.061
598
12.540
61,390
15 60
608
216
400
189
1,473
1.232
13.772
62.622
16 60
638
223
0
195
1,116
922
14.694
63,544
17 60
638
229
0
201
1,128
921
15,615
64,465
18 60
638
236
0
207
1.141
921
16,535
65,385
19 60
670
243
0
213
1,186
946
17.481
66,331
20 60
670
251
450
219
1,650
1.300
18.781
67.631
21,444
59 of 131

Reclaimed System
$52.150 Estimated Cost to Design and Inslall System
r 1.20096
PI" - C + C '
[I + r}'
PV 572,sa58 Present Value of Casts
Cost Sumrnary Table
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee Sample Coat
Pumping Ct1s1 liV Replacement Cost
Ct
Total Ct PV
increase 5% evwy 3 mvresc 3% yearly
years
tnaease $51) every 5 Increase 3%yearly
years
Anauat IrK.V d
Casts (5)
Annual
Viscauated Cost
t;1
T" Docmn d Pie m Yew
Costs M oT CoKSM
1 60 ew 143
0 125
924
917
917 53,0E
2 60
600
147
D
129
936
914
S,b31
53,961
3 60
600
152
0
133
9"
911
2.742
54.892
4 60
630
156
0
137
983
937
3,679
55,829
5 60
630
16T
300
141
1.292
T,217
4,696
57.046
6 60
630
166
0
145
1.001
932
5A25
57.97a
7 60
662
171
0
149
1.042
958
6.M
58.936
8 60
662
176
0
154
1.051
955
7.741
59.891
9 60
652
181
0
154
1.061
953
6.694
603"
TO 60
695
167
350
163
1.454
1,29t
9.985
62,135
t 1 60
695
192
0
168
1.115
978
10.962
63,112
T2 60
595
199
0
173
1.126
975
11.938
64.088
13 6D
729
204
0
175
1.171
1.003
12.941
65,091
14 60
729
210
c
w
1,183
1.001
13.942
66.092
15 60
729
216
400
169
1,595
1,333
15,275
67.425
16 60
756
223
0
195
1,243
1.027
16.303
68.453
17 60
766
229
0
201
1,256
1.025
17.326
59.478
1 a 60
766
236
0
207
1,269
1.024
18,352
70,502
19 60
804
243
0
213
1,320
1.053
19.404
71,554
20 60
&A
251
45D
219
1.784
1.405
20,869
72,959
23,753
60 of 131

Discharge System
824,250 Estimated Cosl to Design and Install System
1.20096
IT - C o + � c
(I + r)r
�v 539.495 Present Value of Costs
Cost Summary Table
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee
Sample Cost
Pumping Cost UV Re placement Cost
C,
Total Ct PV
Inuease S% a ,y 3
years
lntr ase M yearly
Iruease 550 ever} 5 Iatl c 3% yearly
years
Annual lrx ,red
C-15 tS}
Annue!
L4swuled CnS[
(s)
Total O-aled Present Value
Cdsts (5) 41 cm (5l
1 60 350
122
0 125
657
649
649 24 699
2 60
350
126
0
129
664
649
1.298
25.548
3 60
350
129
0
133
672
648
1,946
26-196
4 60
368
133
0
137
697
665
2.611
26.861
5 60
368
137
300
141
1,006
947
3,559
27.K9
6 60
368
141
0
145
714
665
4.223
28.473
7 60
386
146
0
149
741
68t
4,905
29.155
8 60
386
150
0
154
750
B81
5.586
29.B36
9 60
386
155
a
159
759
582
6.268
30,518
10 60
405
159
350
163
1.137
1.010
7.277
31.527
11 60
405
164
a
168
797
699
7.976
32.226
12 60
405
169
0
173
807
699
B,676
32.926
13 60
425
174
0
178
838
717
9.393
33.643
14 60
425
179
0
184
848
718
10,111
34.361
15 60
425
185
400
189
1.259
1.053
11.163
35.413
16 60
447
190
4
195
692
737
11.900
36.150
17 60
447
1136
0
201
903
737
12.637
36697
18 60
447
202
0
207
915
736
13,375
37,625
19 60
459
208
0
213
950
757
14.132
38.352
20 60
469
214
450
219
1.412
1.112
15.245
39.495
17,417
61 of 131

Attachment J
Local Government Review Forms
62 of 131

Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Dr. Richard Woodruff
City Manager
City of Jacksonville
815 New Bridge Street
Jacksonville, North Carolina 28540
RE: Local Government Review Form
Application for Discharge System — D'Amato Property
1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546
Dear Dr. Woodruff,
November 30, 2021
Enclosed please find a Local Government Review Form required for a Certificate of
Coverage application supporting a proposed wastewater treatment system (system). The
proposed system will be permitted under the NCG550000 General Discharge Permit for
Single Family Residences (SFRs). The proposed system will serve an existing 3-
Bedroom SFR located in Onslow County, North Carolina. The proposed system will
replace a failed sub -surface system that currently serves the SFR.
The site has been deemed unsuitable for ground absorption sewage treatment systems by
the Onslow County Department of Environmental Services due to unsuitable soil
conditions and insufficient space. It is my opinion that a wastewater treatment system
covered by the General Discharge Permit is the only technologically and economically
feasible option for this residence.
Please complete the enclosed form for inclusion in the application for the proposed
system. This residence is located in Onslow County and in the Jacksonville City limits.
Please note that this form is only meant to determine zoning/jurisdiction information for
the county and does not indicate your approval of the proposed system.
I appreciate your time and efforts in completing this form. If you have any questions or
comments, please feel free to contact me at 919-367-6310.
Best Regards,
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering
63 of 131

UAmato Property
1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Attachment A. Local. Government Review Form
General Statute : North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the
issuance of NPDES Permits for non -municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental
Management Commission (F:MC) may not act on an application for a new non -municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility
until it has received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on
which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shali document whether the city or
county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is
consistent with the ordinance. The EMC shall not approve a pernut application for any facility which a city or county has
determined to be inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to
have statewide significance and is in the best interest of the State.
Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must:
■ Submit a copy of the permit application (with a written request for this form to be completed) to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail, return receipt requested.
■ If either (or both) local government(s) fail(s) to mail the completed form, as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
mail card(s), within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail, the applicant may submit the application to
the NPDES Unit.
a As evidence to the Commission that the local govemment(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the applicant shall submit
a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s) failed to respond within
the 15-day period.
Instructio.os to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local
City of Jacksonville
(City/County)
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes [ 1 No [ ] If no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or suMvision ordinance? Yes [ ] No [ ]
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance) Yes [ ]
No[ ]
Date Sienature_
State
County of
(City Manager/County Manager)
On this day of , personally appeared before me, the said
name to me known and known to me to be the person described in
and who executed the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged that he (or she) executed the same and being duly sworn
by me, made oath that the statements in the foregoing document are true.
My Commission expires .{-signature of Notary
Notary Public (Official Sea])
FAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 9 of 8
64 of 131

Z 1�
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Ms. Sharon Griffin
County Manager
Onslow County
234 NW Corridor Boulevard
Jacksonville, North Carolina 28540
RE: Local Government Review Form
Application for Discharge System — D'Amato Property
1961 Rocky Run Road, Jacksonville, NC 28546
Dear Ms. Griffin,
November 30, 2021
Enclosed please find a Local Government Review Form required for a Certificate of
Coverage application supporting a proposed wastewater treatment system. The proposed
system will be permitted under the NCG550000 General Discharge Permit for Single Family
Residences (SFRs). The proposed system will serve an existing 3-Bedroom SFR located in
Onslow County, North Carolina. The proposed system will replace a failed sub -surface
system that currently serves the SFR.
The site has been deemed unsuitable for ground absorption sewage treatment systems by the
Onslow County Department of Environmental Services due to unsuitable soil conditions and
insufficient space. It is my opinion that a wastewater treatment system covered by the
General Discharge Permit is the only technologically and economically feasible option for
this residence.
Please complete the enclosed form for inclusion in the application for the proposed system.
This residence is located in Onslow County. Please note that this form is only meant to
determine zoning/jurisdiction information for the county and does not indicate your approval
of the proposed system.
I appreciate your time and efforts in completing this form. If you have any questions or
comments, please feel free to contact me at 919-367-6310.
Best Regards,
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering
65 of 1 M

D'Amato Property
1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, NC 28545
Attachment A. Local Government Review Form
General Statute overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(G) allows input from local governments in the
issuance of NPDES Permits for non -municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental
Management Commission (EMC) may not act on an application for a new non -municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility
until it has received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on
which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or
county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is
consistent with the ordinance. The EMC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has
determined to be inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to
have statewide significance and is in the best interest of the State.
Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must:
• Submit a copy of the permit application (with a written request for this form to be completed) to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail, return receipt requested.
• If either (or both) local government(s) fad(s) to mail the completed form, as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
mail card(s), within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail, the applicant may submit the application to
the NPDES Unit.
• As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the applicant shall submit
a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s) failed to respond within
the 15-day period.
Instructions to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local
Onslow County
(City/County)
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes [ ] No J ] If no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and return it to the applicant.
❑oes the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes J ] No [ ]
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes [ ]
No[ ]
Date Sienature
State
County of
(City Manager/County Manager)
On this day of , personally appeared before me, the said
name to me known and known to me to be the person described in
and who executed the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged that he (or she) executed the same and being duly sworn
by me, made oath that the statements in the foregoing document are true.
My Commission expires .(;signature of Notary
Notary Public (Official :seal)
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 9 of 8
66 of 131

Attachment K
Plans and Specifications for the Proposed Discharge System
67 of 131

&WX- -IT
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Date:
FINAL DESIGN
NOT RELEASED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, NC 28456
Onslow County
Plans and Specifications For Discharge System
April 20, 2022
:140. FiYW►�
dry
CfWAL
-p5lq
qRy Y
Design Engineer: Kevin D. Davidson, P.E.
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, NC 27502
Office: 919-859-0669
Direct: 919-367-6310
Cell: 919-623-3538
Email: kdavidsongagriwaste.com
68 of 131

Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27592
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
FINAL DESIGN
NOT RELEASED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, NC 28456
Onslow County
Plans and Specifications for Discharge System
• Narrative Description of Discharge System
• Design Spreadsheets
• Drawings of Proposed System
• Tank Specification Sheets
• Access Riser Adapters, Risers, Lids
• Effluent Filter Specification
• Specification for AdvanTex AX-20 RT Pod
• Pump Vault Specification (Integrated into AdvanTex Pod System)
• Specification for Re -circulation Tank Pump (Integrated into AdvanTex Pod System)
• Specification for Discharge Pump
• Specification for Control Panel and Float Controls (AdvanTex Pod System)
• Specification for UV System
69 of 131

Narrative Description
of
Discharge Treatment System
The Discharge System that has been designed considers the following components:
- Septic Tank
- AdvanTex AX20-RT Treatment Pod
UV Disinfection
- Discharge Outlet
- Control Panel
Due to the advanced technology in this system, a Certified Operator should be contracted to
maintain this syste► L
Septic Tank
A new 1,250-gallon septic tank will be installed for this system. The septic tank will include an
effluent filter and risers. An Orenco 8" Biotube effluent filter will be installed in the outlet end of
the septic tank. New access risers will be installed on both the inlet and outlet ends of the septic
tank. To facilitate the installation of the access risers, riser adapters will be cast into the tank top
during construction. All wastewater from the single-family residence, including greywater, will be
routed into the septic tank. Waste that exits the septic tank will flow into the AdvanTex AX20-RT
Treatment Pod.
AdvanTex AX20-RT Treatment Pod
The treatment component of the system is an AdvanTex AX20-RT treatment pod. The pod is an
integrated unit that combines recirculation, treatment, and discharge modules into a single, sealed
unit. Liquid from the septic tank will flow via gravity to the inlet of the treatment pod and into the
recirculation tank portion of the AX-RT unit. Liquid from the recirculation tank will be periodically
applied across the filter fabric. Wastewater will be sprayed over the textile sheets. The wastewater
percolates down through the textile sheets and is distributed between the recirculation chamber and
discharge chamber by means of the tank baffle. The treated wastewater exits the AX-RT unit via
gravity to the discharge outlet. Prior to exiting the AX-RT unit, effluent passes through the UV
disinfection system.
The recirculation pump is controlled by a system of 3 floats that operate the recirculation pump in a
Timed Dose arrangement. Float 1 (lowest elevation) is a redundant off float. Float 2 is a Peak
Enable Float and Float 3 acts as a High Water Alarm. Under normal operation the redundant off
float will be engaged thereby activating the timer in the control panel. At the pre-set interval, the
pump will engage and distribute effluent over the textile fabric ("on" cycle). Following this period,
the pump will turn off and rest for a designated time ("off' cycle)". During periods of high water in
the recirculation portion of the tank, the Peak Enable float will engage and reduce the pre-set "off'
time and thereby send increased flow across the fabric. If the water level in the recirculation tank
continues to rise for a pre-set time period, the High Water Alarm will activate.
70 of 131

To prevent groundwater from affecting the pod, the pod will be installed on a bed of gravel. Anti -
flotation measures or a concrete ring installed around the mid -flange will be installed to provide
extra ballast to prevent the flotation of the pod during high water table conditions.
UV Disinfection
Disinfection for the system will be accomplished using a UV system. The UV light should operate
for approximately one year prior to needing to be replaced. If the UV light burns out or loses
sufficient intensity (below a set threshold) an alarm will activate and disable the system pump. An
alarm light on the control panel will also illuminate. When the alarm is activated, the homeowner
should reduce water use (laundry, dishes, washing) until the system is operating properly.
Discharge Outlet
The system discharges into a creek on the northwestern part of the property. Riprap will be placed at
the discharge location to provide aeration of the water as it is discharged and also as erosion
protection. Vegetation and debris should be kept clear of the discharge location. A grate will be
installed on the discharge pipe to prevent animals and rodents from entering the discharge pipe.
Control Panel
One control panel will be installed with this wastewater system. This panel will control operation of
the re -circulation pump and UV system. If desired, this panel can be connected to a land based
phone line that will notify the operator of system operation.
71 of 131

Discharge Wastewater Treatment System Design Calculations
PROJECT: Damato Residence
Location: 1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, NC 28546
County' ❑nslow County
SEPTIC TANK SIZING
Daftv Flow Fstimata
Flow/Unit
# of Units Units1(gpd/unit)FlowlDa d
3
BR
1 120
360
TOTAL DAILY FLOW Q =
364 gpd
Septic Tank Volume/Size (based on denitrification process)
Approximate Return Flow from Pod 640 gpd
60% of Daily Flow 216 gpd
Total (approx 1 day retention) 756 gal
TANK SIZE PROVIDED = 1,250 gal.
RECIRCULATION TANK & POI] SIZING
-or Single Family Residences with 5 bedrooms or less,
# Bedrooms Daily Design Flow AX Units
4 or less <480 gpd AX-20-RT
5 600 gpd AX-25-RT
Daily flow = 360 gpd
AX Unit Required = AX20-RT
Timer Settings
Date: f 8-Apr-22
Required DoseslDay
96
Recirculation Ratio
3 :1
Design Flow (0)
360 gpd
Flow to Pods
1,080 gpd
Flow to ST
540 gpd
Pump Flow
1.620 gpd
Dose Volume to Pod
11.3 gallons
# of Pumps
1
Pod Flowrate
12 gpm
Return Flowrate
6 gpm
Pump Flowrate
18.00 gpm
# of Cycles/day 96
Cycle Volume 16.9 gallons
Cycle Run time 0.94 min
Cycle Off Time 14.06 min
72 of 131

Septic Tank Buoyancy Calculation
Project. Damato Residence
Location: 1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, MC 28546
County: ❑nslcw County
Tank Size [nominal] = 1,250 gallons
Pro rtiesrAssum Lions:
Min liquid level to be maintained in tank at all times after initial installation
Assume groundwater table is equal to or higher than top of tank.
(6 uoyawy is the same as long as water tabre es higher fhan top or lank 1
Effluent Density = 62.4 1blft"3 [Specific Weight of Water]
Concrete Density = 142.56 Ibfft"3
Soil Cover Over Tank = 1.00 ft. [minimum]
Soil Bulk Density = 1.25 (typical value)
ranK uimenstons rrom su uer
Exterior Interior
Length = 10.46 ft. 9.96 ft.
Width = 5.46 ft. 4.96 ft
Total Tank Depth = 5.13 ft.
Liquid Depth in Tank = 0 in.
0.00 ft.
Area of Riser Openings = 6.28 ft"2
Tank Weight (est.) = 11.000 lb. [based on
Buoyancy Force calculation:
Buoyancy Force = Specific Weight of Water x Displaced Volume
Bua a ncy Farce= 18,266 lb.
Welaht Calculation
Tank Weight =
11,000 lb
Ater Weight in Tank =
0 lb
ail Weight Over Tank =
3,963 lb
Soil Tension Force =
4.037 lb
Total Weight =
19,000 lb
!Vote: Total weight must be greater than buoyancy force
so that tank wig not float dvnng high water fable conditions
73 of 131

AdvanTex AX20-RT Pod Buoyancy Calculation
Project: Damato Residence
Location: 1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, NC 28546
County: Onslow County
RT Model = AX20 Gravity
All calculations are performed assuming completely submerged conditions, with no
liquid in the unit.
Effluent Density =
Net Beam Density =
Net Soil Density =
Unit Weight =
62A Ibfft"3 (Density of Water)
67.55 lbrft"3
67.6 Iblft"3
883 lb (based on manufacturer)
Supplemental Ballast Evaluation (Anti-Buovancv Beam
Top of beam to tank bottom = 6.00 in
Tank exposure length = 2.00 in
Burial depth to beam = 5.33 ft
Width of beam = 0.69 ft
8.25 in
Force Calculation:
Force = 12,475 lb (based on manufactu
veQht Calculation
Tank Weight = 883 lb
Soil Weight on Beam = 11,826 lb
Weight of Beam = 129.2 lb
Total Weight = 12,838 Ib
Note: Total weight must be greater than buoyancy force
so that tank will not float during high water table conditions.
74 of 131

Discharge Wastewater Treatment System - Elevation Calculations
PROJECT: ❑amato Residence
Location: 1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, NC 28546
County: Onslow County
Determination Sheet
Site Elevation Readings
Approximate Elevations
Elevation
Drainline Invert at House
34.50 ft
GS at New Septic Tank
36.50 It
GS at RT Unit
35.50 It
Elevation at Discharge Invert
31.00 ft
Tank
Ground Surface at Septic Tank
36.50 ft
Cover over Septic Tank
18.00 in
1.50 ft
Elevation at top of Septic Tank
35.00 ft
Distance to Inlet Invert from Top
0.96 ft
Elevation at Inlet Invert of ST
34.04 ft
❑rainline Length From House
17.00 ft
Slope of Line
2.70 %
❑istance to Outlet Invert from Tap
1.13 ft
Elevation at Outlet Invert of 5T
33.86 ft
AdvanTex RT Unit
Pipe Length from ST outlet
Slope of Line
Ground Surface at RT Unit
Elevation at Inlet Invert
Distance to Inlet invert from top
Top of Unit
Cover over Inlet Invert
Extension Height
Height of Unit
Bottom Elevation
Outlet Distance from Bottom
Outlet Elevation
Height of Unit Exposed
13.00 ft
2.75 %
35.50 ft
33.52 ft
25.8 in
35.67 ft
1.98 ft
23.79 in
0.00 in
72.00 in
6.00 It
29.67 It
32.50 in
32.38 ft
2.00 in
Discharge Point
Pipe Slope to Discharge Point
Pipe Length
Elevation at Discharge invert
Float Settings
Recirculation
Low Water/Redundant Off
Pump Override Timer
High Water Alarm
1.38%
100.00 ft
31.00 ft
Elev. (ft) Height
from Tank
Floor (in)
32.00 28
33.08 41
33.21 42.5
75 of 131

Discharge Wastewater Treatment System - Main System Components
PROJECT: Oamato Residence
Location: 1961 Rocky Run Road
Jacksonville, NC 28546
County: OnsIow County
Main System Component List
Component Manufacturer
Part No.
Quaaft
Notes
Septic Tank
Shoaf Precast
STS-389
1
1250 gallon
Tank Riser Adapters
Orenco
PRTA-24
2
Cast -in Riser Adapters
Septic Tank Risers
Orenco
RR24-XX
2
Adjust for 6" Height Above Grade
Riser Lid
Orenco
FLI724G
2
Effluent Filter
Orenco
FTP 0854-36
1
Safety Nets
Sim -Tech
STF-N24
2
4 clips on Outlet Net
Splice Box
Orenco
SBEX14
1
Install on RT Pod
Treatment Pod
Orenco
AX20-RT UV
1
Mode 3A
Recirculation Pump
Orenco
PF3005 1 1
1
In RT Pod
Control Panel
Orenco
AXA1 SA UV IS
1
For Internet Line
76 of 131

Damgto Residence Surface Discharge 1 AWr
Project Location: 1961 Rocky Run Rood
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Onslow County
PIN# 531700855069
Project Owner: Tony and Heidi D'Amato
41649 Elk Run Drive
Murrieta, CA 92562
[phone]
Domatc—[e-mail]
aroject Consultant: Kevin D. Davidson, P.E.
[e-mail]
Agri —Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, NC 27502
[phone]
[phone] Fax
System Overview: Single Family Residence
Three (3) Bedroom, 360 gpd
Design Standard — Discharge
AdvanTex AX-20 RT Pod
with Single Bulb UV Disinfection
0SITE
1►I[NI01kWd &1_l9
Sheet Index
Sheet
1
Cover Sheet
Sheet
2
Property Layout
Sheet
3
Component Layout
Sheet
4
System Detail #1
Sheet
5
System Detail #2
O'Amato Residency
wmhooka 7re2hMA Spt -
hiy� " � a,�
4V Q Rn edw
"'W" 0%I=
rrrr ON*
W 4%U
This document
was originally
signed and sealed
by Kevin D.
I)avidson, NC PE
J024582 on April
21, 2022. This
medium shall not
be considered a
signed and sealed
document.
FWDE994
h0r FLUM 1u
OW OW
S�WMa
Cover Sheet
►►�
77 01 131

N'F
JOSEPH HENDERSON
0,$. 434, PG. 586
NOTES
- Adjuat tanks to meal silo Constraints.
- Control Panel to be within 15'-19 of the LIV
system. Can be mounted now the house.
PROPERTYLAYOUT
PEN BRANCH
'ST00-c tpp.ST
1 _
I
15' House
t spa 1 36 g N'F
rq
I - JOYCE HALE
o D,IE3. 11,58, PG. 530
EXISTING ` ��Kv.. 38, 1
SYSTEM -- -- — —
LOCATION 1
552RD'OD`W Bt.50' S53V2'Ua-W SDO.iS
NCSR 1413
ROCKY RUN ROAD
60' R/W
AWT
Sot.] iW
•{taµ�� I Ai
�W
O'Amata Residence
&em ONMarge
*NWNOW inolmnl 9ntan
a..i-4.
%��
t ON E.
w,. C
ny sstx�
PRWEMOW FHL M SSW
This document
was originally
signed and sealed
by Kevin D.
❑avidson, NC PE
#024582 on April
21, 2022. This
medium shall not
be considered a
.,fined and sealed
doCument-
FW DEM
W FnLM,OR COMMUM
V. ate=
S/EEl 1tIlE
Property Layout
«4
REVRFG Bh RH>Sie dl:
DR
Re,c+rm n: R,�xa uc
W ►Y —2
78 of 131

l
l ST
CO OL 1 0
` 1T gi evj .
1{
1
1 $5
° H _se, P AX20-RT
UV
1`l
1kjk�
1�
jIY
I
j!1
Z#
1
4 I
J I
J
❑ 4 a ,
Feel
COMPONENT LAYOUT
...�Td -
b
'SHEEPS BRA
- � N CH
w/ S't. ge Point
Dis�Hap �e
`rtabill'Z4tion Into Strea-
\-Instnll Gr-pte or.
End of Line
DISCHARGE POINT
Line Legend
tine
Name Sim
Type
1X
Drain One 4.0"
SCH 40 PVC
ML
Effluent Diecharpe Line ;,p•
SCH 40 PVC
ML
Effluent Return line 1 1.0,
SCH 40 PVC
NOTES
- Adjust tanks to meet site constraints
- Grade surface in lank area as needed to maintain required slope On pipes.
- Route drain line (DO from house to ST to minimize damage to existing trees.
- Effluent di scirarge line (EDL) to maintain minimum I % sl ape and 18" burial depth
- Ball valve on effluent rewm line may be inside RT Unil or ST inlet riser
- Properly abandon existing septic tank.
- Adjust autlet location of all "ersidamspouts as needed to shed runoff away
from trealmom system.
COMPONENT
ST Septic Tank
LEGEND
CP
Control Panel
RT Recirculation Tank
W
W Disinfection
A AdvanTex Pod
P
Pump
SO Splice Box
EF
Effluent Filter
IT Inlet Tee
$V
Bun Valve
AWT
Eign.xe w ea..d.�ele
rpnrweM i �r.v�p.".Irc
'Amato Residence
Wam.aler ireatmen, SrO—
r1Y ve r�.e r
0 M 0�
ki li
w� u ux:
lt,% 6'b,Nl
ao
NL
KMu xaee .. ae C
Rif MIMOM
core
PFIOFP $I MNEER WL
This document
was originally
gtted and sealed.
by Kevin D.
Davidson, NC PE
H024582 on April
21, 2022. This
medium shall not
be considered a
signed and sealed
document.
FYK MMI:N
IIW RULW FM COWRLCTO
- MOM Opd.tr,l
5,EEt AM
Component Layout
�kMCWArM
4/20/=
AL16E0 @h kEY6E11 aN
IRIMUSM Of. FaCASM eft
maw William
WW-3

MODEL: TS 1250 SYS
NON TRAFFIC
12" CNlon SWIG Tknk
..e F-1 VL----:
Mi
Not to scale
in SEPT1C TANH {pR EQVVALI=
Clean, Tamped BarkflFt
4" SCH 40 PVC y
lass B Rip Re
wl Grate
FdlerFaar,:;
57Gfa.e:
_--undisturbad
1--Glean, Tamped Backfill
Eafm
Not to scale
DISC W7RI E R1Pg4OETAIL
R[e.c lmwt• Stle iw'.
;0.:ZPRT t7Y ADVANTEX TREATMENT SYSTEM -FOR ILLUUWTION ONLY
Install Safety Net
In Each Access Riser
w
G W pay
Not to scale
r1 SAFETY NET (INSTALL IN TANK RISERS?
l Rc Lhmi.Yr -Frni I'. .
i MUNRO
11
&IOYANCY_INSTALLRTION
1. 3.und-y �Ia I.ipn baeed on Su"y
—pWt.d by o.Nd T. tWnm.
2. Septic T9.k to Iro approval Ohio
ERhxnt Ater ewd rl FTPS-0e54-36 He
3. Trealment "Mom to ae lod' foam any
II, 15' from rca:eence G[ieirp
feundilli , 10' foam property Fne.. one
SO' from stream. V ff'.Wan of these
SeWcw to bm performed by ceneroctf
4. Cantroom sholl Eockrll orayna oil m"u
a..cn knot Me—
ter a .nee
away loom pohM:al ntry Points.
5- M"A *W. tionP of as canporenl. to b.
—TOO M 1p11p by CmUaatoo to .nsurm
prover epereGm.
6. AP sync pipklq to be SCH40 PVC except
wMn hotrod
7- All grpn'tr Clbow3 to ba tang rOQua ar
Img ar..ping type elbow..
& Aetuol imtdWlion and pkra.m.nl et
tr.w—.t .W 1. b. by
Cmtmcw.
9. use Clear 'R' evesion eantml Mena for
M—t—I b— for eutl.t albol 1N.Mien
structure. Use #5 of 057 atone few
s.d:nn.nt contra.
10. �achmq. kno mart tire canoed to p
Mimum depth of 18'_ iiischewq. p{pe
0utIM to hgpe "..
11, Flew from the rape-rykeg Kream pack into
11 "Iwok alwll be prewnt.d.
12. Enalnq:n.er ln.pac6i r.quirMl during syMem
iolptign and al find CgmpNYon.
13, CmtfectM to seed ene/m —
dialufbee e a to 'ziaa with
eaiHinq
kmascap.. r Arco ahulk sal b. left with
puppy. d .pR.
14. Lipoo fymtmm compNtI_. Contractor to
.uppy Engineer with dOCurwMlalian of
inetplMim and a cignod Ntter rna"t-.no
, ain.tpaee „ee
ny dinkA- Ircm�eppm.
15, CW1101 w to laM.1 lntarf t Ikl. to VCOIi
conVnl panel.
16. Adwnrex-RT v it to k. placed m gmr.1
y band bpckf.Il.d wdh growl.
17. Wouat CaMrd Po"I a mtelmym OF 24'
obo" gmae. Power to papal to be
Initdod bl' Iieeneed Moc[rteion per cede.
$a. Leak W rmawna on septic tank and pod.
is. Yrotar kpipot to be tm.tad om extarsar V
r ,6d.n'. rithin SO' of tonkJ.
20. Pour cencrvre ca orr emend flange
eal
tr.n[nnt Il atoll anti-buoymcy
bean. par meMaatur.r'a
1. 0,, lww n..
21_ i M61 rppc [Gels to bm =FY
decum nod. emI 01..Fall pmy�a
dawnmtatien roam weta.ge ca..nt)r.
22. RR WOSWaet.r f— the S7R, inctu6n9
gr ywal.r, la to W co.wymd to the
""Gc tank
23. Rvs—latkn T .r S,.m a:
TIME ON/OFF- 0.ae/ti.06 mim.lm
12 qpm to Pad / 6 qpm to Septic To"
nw�r
l�y�.rwn woe SpR S[hnlrlr
paww.w *.an.R.Ri..r
wr k. s.rn sn..l, Pew xu
+r+.rr�e.A.. �1em
�im.aekpea
O'Amalo Residence
Sabo( MSA"
1PoMe.ale, T,*Wn 'd Srshm
or. r+m.aae
hl' M Red 71Ye11f
i1Nt OI 111W
(i10) !
0c C 57S{7
0 par9pl
"'WV
1xI NW or x.y
I0MW
aw
PIM 9l7A(6S'AIi
PROF[S9o1111. DIGNEER SUL
Fins document
was originally
signed and sealed
by Kevin D.
Davidson, NC PE
#024582 on April
21, 2022. This
medium shall not
be considered a
signed and sealed
document.
WY RftE4ZD FM COUFB Chan
IN -am 1pk+Idr
System Details #1
7UAN ft. W.Arm pk
IElfl[FD Br: poi roan Pk
W W-4
80 of 131

fLmN PN
N� teeth Oz^^e
sf �w.rre
r e' Hawn Pn.t
n
Sw Belti {l]
qr lµ YN SYrp IIN NP l
Av �
1Y Rnr Cprwlm vxx o�e�d�d
,, ._ IXa•wtsn C�ieA Dbcmcb
�r
e' awe cows
R�� L+1
FeiW 9e.-
� Cal M PNa
� Alep�
ER.
I.Yb4�C
FeT
C1RM1 rpr�e ?1M
O> T~
Rehm
liti
nW
Buffiea 4e to ionk {iP m6t-56-fC:
BdY!!I
� ��
6" f^�n) frAm� 9w4
B' Ffna.) CmHI SE6
n.a�.
uw tr.c.e EPrtn
wu.��e Eunn axw YeA.
Not to scale
ig,SYSTE DETAIL - FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY
M W NT PAN EL OIRECILV
Tp POSTS OR TO
ALWANuM PLAT E
CONTROL W9 off P,0,d t K+ 5
PANEL
SINpLE
D
C ONDUT
Imnpcn]
CONDOT
SUPPORT
2'min.
7X�iRil.I -SECURE
R ISER pR
MATH �- 3' DECI[ SCREWS
_'J RRUGATE 0 PIPE
PER PAST
COVER CONOuIT
•�i .11!L
MINIMUM 1 B•
TO RT UNti
TO POWER SOURCE
W ITiNSTALL TT"-�C..N
E"]miry
MULTIPLE
CONDuIT3 AS
NEEDEO
3' BURIAL DEPTH
i I � MiNiMu4
lul j'�Jj�
Not to scale
CONTROL PANEL SUPPORT(OR EOl11VALENT]
Sevalon Delermenateorr Sheet
Site E Inration Rwdlings
Approzrmate Elevations
Eevaton
Dram line I nv ert at H ou se
34 50 ft
AdvanTex RT Unit
Disc harge Point
GS at 14ow Septic Tank
36 50 ft
Pipe Length from ST outlet
13 00 ft Pipe Slope to Discharge Point
GSat RT Unrt
35 50 ft
Slope 0 Line
275 % Pipe Length
Elevation at Otschorgo Invert
3100 h
Ground Surface al RT Unit
35 50 ft Elevation at Discharge invert
Septic Tank
Ground Surface at Septic Tank
Cover over Septic Tank
Elevation at top of SWN: Tank
Distance to Inlet I ert from Top
Elevation all Inlet IrrverI of ST
Mainline Length From House
Slope of Line
Distance to Outlet ImertfromTop
Elevation at Outlet Itrverl of ST
ELEVATION DETERMINATIONS
Bev abon at Inlet Inver!
Distance to Inlet invert from top
Top of Unit
36 50 ft
Cover over Inlet Inveil
1900 in
150 ft
Elaension Height
3500 It
Height of Una
096 ft
3404 ft
Bottom Elevation
1700 ft
Outlet Distance from Bo torn
2 70 %
O utlet Vev ation
1 13 ft
Height of Vnit Exposed
3368 ft
3352 it
258 in
3667 0
198 ft
2379 in
000 in
T2 00 in
600 ft
2967 ft
3250 in
3238 ft
200 in
Float sank,"
Recirculation
Law WaterlRedundarlt Of
Pu mp Oven ide Timer
High Wafer Alarm
1 38 %
10000 ft
31 00 ft
Elev fkl Height
from Tanlr
Floor (Hi)
3200 28
3308 41
3321 42
AWT
E^y^M� wd Spa ]nme m
•vHNM� Tdmnvl'. gym.
Set N'w�f C�e� C. SrH
�. Wa f'AZ
DtAmoto Residence
Sufeee DigFafge
fiortnro4r r2,e„mi s�iem
o.rr wt�aar
oY vd tH/ VA.om
liey Fl Rn 0'Me
MTH0. � rau
f91D] 670•17vi
��mw^
�1 Wvnrw:
t9{I etNl e,r Pq �p-
prry
PIS ss'Tn}ypae
Rt7FCSSM D0&ER SM
this document
was originally
Signed and scaled
by Kevin D.
Davidson, NC PE
tr J24582 on April
21,2022.This
medium shall not
he considered a
4igned and sealed
document.
nWL DES414
,,Or RFILM FM DvarRx"
r, wrEc wn �
System Details #21
"--- I ----
Mc MA6W
WW-5
8191131

—NOTE -USE 24'
CAST -IN -PLACE
ORENCO RISER
ADAPTER
7—
S9 1/2•
63 Vr
3.0renco 24'
Riser Base
*/ Lid
6'
TOP VIEW
r>«TOP VIEW MEASUREMENTS
ARE TO WIDEST DIMENSIONS
OrpnCD 2d'
Riser Base
NI Ip
2d 4' INLET 6
OUTLET BOOTS
ON ENDS OLNY
SHOAF PRECAST SEPTIC INC.
MODEL: TS 1250 ST6
NON TRAFFIC
1250 Gallon Septic Tank
4130 WEST US HWY 64
LEXINGTON, NC 27295
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
W WW.SHOAFPRECAST.COM
SHOAF-1,250 SEPTIC TANK
STB-389
LIQUID CAPACITY-1,252 GALLONS/10' AIRSPACE
TANK HEIGHT-6I J'
BOTTOM OF TANK TO CENTER OF INLET-52'
BOTTOM OF TANK TO CENTER OF OUTLE7-50'
LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO-2 TO 1
SIZE OF INLET 6 OUTLET-4' PIPE
TYPE OF INLET L OUTLET-POLYLOCK OR EQUAL (MEETS ASTM C-923)
CONCRETE PSI-40001 TANK WEIGHT- 11,000 LBS.
REINFORCEMENT PER STATE CODE
SCALE - N.T.S.
C3. Cast In Place Orenco Riser Adapters T 4•
f -}
127 Ir2'
1191r8`
INL T
M 3/4'------� �+-- m 31"r"TE-TEE ICT
---lM AIR SPR[E _---- 2•--PLIED
WATER LEVE7L(
�VENT
M OF
FLOW dd urET
THROUGH
TO B❑TT13M
OF 4' INLET ;'
SIDE VIEW g.
T5•
116'
122'
Not to scale
seNOTE I' BUTYL RUBBER
STATE
HASTIE SEALANT
APPROVAL #
CONTINU[JUS IN JOINT
65 112'
SH❑AF-1250
STS-389
39 I/Z'
2' VENiE�3
sLDT
3'
w yr sa 1/E•
� •,� 4 V J[F4
@4•FLOTHR
END VIEW
62'
82 of 131