HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230119 Ver 1_WRC Comments_20230313r
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Cameron Ingram, Executive Director
Via Email
13 March 2023
Ms. Samantha Dailey
U.S. Amry Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Dr., Suite 614
Charlote, NC 28262
Ms. Jennifer Robertson
Atlas Environmental
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
SUBJECT: Public Notice Comments for the Individual Permit Application for the Skyway Logistics
Park, 2928 Shopton Road, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. USACE
Action ID: SAW-2019-00292; DEQ No. 20230119v1.
Dear Mses. Dailey and Robertson,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject
document. Comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as
amended) and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended;
16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
On behalf of EastGroup Properties Inc. (applicant), Atlas Environmental has submitted an Individual
Permit (IP) application for the Skyway Logistics Park located at 2928 Shopton Road in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed project is Phase 2 of a commercial development and
will involve permanent impacts to 557 linear feet of streams and 0.9737 acre of wetlands. Coffey Creek
and its unnamed tributaries flow through the site. Coffey Creek in the Catawba River Basin is classified
as a Class C stream by the NC Division of Water Resources. The applicant is proposed to Permittee
Responsible Mitigation for 1395 linear feet of streams and 0.498 acre of wetland, and the remaining
mitigation credits will be purchased from the NC Division of Mitigation Services, which will need to use
the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area to meet the mitigation requirements.
NCWRC has the following comments and recommendations:
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: (919) 707-0220 • Fax: (919) 707-0028
13 March 2023
Skyway Logistics Parkway IP
USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-00491
Page 2 NCWRC Comments
1. NCWRC has concerns for the large amounts of impacts to aquatic resources, especially since it
will require mitigation in the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area. We recommend the applicant
further reduce impacts. One option is to use an underground stormwater detention system to
allow more space for design layout changes to reduce impacts.
2. We would like to see a mitigation plan for the Permittee Responsible Mitigation, which should
include a planting and monitoring plan. Many of the bare root and gallon plants are not native to
the Piedmont, specifically Mecklenburg County. We recommend a plant list that consists of
species typically found in reference streams in Mecklenburg County and the appropriate natural
vegetation community, as described by M.P. Schafale in The Guide to the Natural Communities
of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation (https://www.ncnhp.org/references/nhp-
publications/fourth-approximation-descriptions).
3. Furthermore, non-native plants should not be used for seeding disturbed areas. Specifically, avoid
using Bermudagrass, redtop, tall fescue, and lespedeza, which are invasive and/or non-native. A
list of alternatives to non-native species has been attached. Alternatively, use a grain, such as
oats, wheat, or rye for temporary cover and native seed mixes for permeant seeding. We
recommend planting native, wildflower seed mixes that will create pollinator habitat within the
project boundary.
4. The IP states that the project will have no effects on physical or chemical characteristics of an
aquatic system. However, placing fill in aquatic resources can alter hydrology, result in
significant negative impacts to downstream areas, and eliminate aquatic and terrestrial wildlife
habitat. Additional impervious surface results in an increase in stormwater runoff that can exert
significant impacts on stream morphology. This will cause further degradation of aquatic habitat
through accelerated stream bank erosion, channel and bedload changes, altered substrates, and
scouring of the stream channel. In addition, pollutants (e.g., sediment, heavy metals, pesticides,
and fertilizers) washed from developed landscapes can adversely affect and extirpate species
downstream.
5. Headwater streams can significantly reduce nutrient export to rivers (Alexander et al. 2000;
Peterson et al. 2001) and the condition of the stream in the lower reaches is closely dependent on
the condition in the headwaters (Vannote et al. 1980). Furthermore, placing fill in aquatic
resources can alter hydrology, result in significant negative impacts to downstream areas, and
eliminate aquatic and terrestrial wildlife habitat. Protecting headwater streams and their buffers
are important to protect water quality, reduce sedimentation, and provide aquatic habitat. The NC
Department of Environmental Quality Study of the State's Riparian Buffer Protection Program
document (https://webservices.ncleg.gov/ViewDocSiteFile/19092) states that a minimum 50-foot
buffer is required on intermittent and small perennials streams for bank stabilization, water
temperature moderation, nitrogen removal and sediment (phosphorus) removal.
6. The applicant offers to include buffers around all aquatic resources as an additional avoidance
and minimization measure and states buffer enhancement includes natural or planted buffers
ranging from 30 to 100 feet. NCWRC recommends maintaining a minimum 100-foot native,
undisturbed forested buffer along each side of perennial streams and 50-foot native,
undisturbed forested buffer along each side of intermittent streams and wetlands.
7. Avoid tree clearing activities during the maternity roosting season for bats (May 15 — August 15)
due to the decline of tree roosting bat species, such as the state endangered and federally
proposed endangered tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus).
8. Construction practices that completely clear and grade the landscape are extremely harmful to
water quality, and terrestrial and aquatic wildlife resources. We recommend not clearing the
entire site, but rather maintaining the maximum amount of native vegetation and soil as possible.
We suggest having the site logged or repurposing the wood instead of burning the cleared trees.
13 March 2023
Skyway Logistics Parkway IP
USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-00491
Page 3 NCWRC Comments
9. Stringent sediment and erosion control measures should be implemented and installed prior to
any land -disturbing activity. Incorporate the following elements into erosion and sediment control
plans- minimize clearing and grading, protect waterways, phase construction for larger
construction sites (>25 acres), stabilize soils as rapidly as possible (<2 weeks), protect steep
slopes, establish appropriate perimeter controls, employ advanced settling devices, implement a
certified contractors program, and regularly inspect erosion control measures. Ensure all silt
fencing is removed once vegetation has reestablished and soils have stabilized.
10. Erosion control matting made of plastic mesh or twine should not be used within the project area
because it can injury or kill wildlife.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input for this project. If I can provide further assistance, please
call (919) 707-0364 or email olivia.munzer@ncwildlife.org.
Sincerely,
Olivia Munzer
Western Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
ec: Sue Homewood, NCDWR
Andrew Pitner, NCDWR
Literature Cited
Alexander, R. B., R. A. Smith, and G. E. Schwarz. 2000. Effect of stream channel size on the
delivery of nitrogen to Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403:758-761.
Peterson, B. J., W. M. Wollheim, P. J. Mulholland, J. R. Webster, J. L. Meyer, J. L. Tank, E. Marti, W. B.
Bowden, H. M. Valett, A. E. Hershey, W. H. McDowell, W. K. Dodds, S. K. Hamilton, S.
Gregory, and D. D. Morrall. 2001. Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater
streams. Science 292:86-90.
Vannote, R. L., G. W. Mineshell, K. W. Cummins, J R Sedell, and C. E. Cushings. 1980. The river
continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130-137.
RECOMMENDED NATIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR NON-NATIVE GRASSES IN
NORTH CAROLINA**
(Species are appropriate for all geographic regions unless otherwise indicated)
NON-NATIVE SPECIES
NATIVE SPECIES
Crownvetch
Centipede
Bermuda
Big bluestem
Little bluestem
Indiangrass
Switchgrass
Beaked panicgrass
Purpletop
Roundheaded bushclover
Deer tongue
Sensitive partridge pea
Partridge pea
Andropogon gerardii
Schizachyrium scoparium
Sorghastrum nutans
Panicum virgatum
Panicum anceps
Tridens flavus
Lespedeza capitata
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Chamaecrista nictitans
Chamaecrista fasciculata
Kentucky bluegrass
Tall fescue
Sudangrass
Big bluestem
Little bluestem
Indiangrass
Switchgrass
Beaked panicgrass
Purpletop
Broomsedge
Deer tongue
Canadian wildrye
Virginia wildrye
Sensitive partridge pea
Partridge pea
Andropogon gerardii
Schizachyrium scoparium
Sorghastrum nutans
Panicum virgatum
Panicum anceps
Tridens flavus
Andropogon virginicus
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Elymus canadensis
Elymus virginicus
Chamaecrista nictitans
Chamaecrista fasciculata
Sericea lespedeza
Kobe lespedeza
Switchgrass
Splitbeard bluestem
Beggarlice
Deer tongue
Sensitive partridge pea
Partridge pea
Panicum virgatum
Andropogon ternarius
Desmodium spp.
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Chamaecrista nictitans
Chamaecrista fasciculata
NC Native Plant Recommendations
**A recommended revegetation/stabilization mix would ideally include a combination
of the species listed in this table. In addition, please note that additional consideration
may be needed in areas that are (highly) erodible and/or have sloped terrain. The
following species could be included in all regions for additional stabilization and
wildlife benefit:
Black-eyed susan:
Plains coreopsis:
Lance -leaved coreopsis:
Narrow -leaved sunflower:
Created October 2018
Rudbeckia hirta
Coreopsis tinctoria
Coreopsis lanceolata
Helianthus angustifolius