20120776 Ver 2_401 Application_20150315

Fhwl<
WDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
26 March 2015
Tasha McCormick
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 -5006
Subject: Town of Boone Water System Improvements Pre - Construction Notification
Dear Ms. McCormick:
Enclosed please find two paper copies of the Pre - Construction Notification for the Town of Boone
Water System Improvements Project in Watauga County, NC.
The original submittal was provided in August 2012. The enclosed one includes design and impact
revisions, as well as detailed responses to DENR's 17 September 2012 comments.
The project consists of construction of a raw water intake within the South Fork of the New River and a
primary raw water pump station, both located approximately 0.5 mile upstream of the Cranberry
Springs Road Bridge in Watauga County; approximately 11.6 miles of new 24 inch raw water
transmission line; a raw water booster pump station, located along the west side of Brownwood Road,
approximately 0.25 mile north of US 421; and expansion of the treatment capacity of Boone's existing
water treatment plant from 3.0 million gallons per day (mgd) to 4.5 mgd within its footprint, located on
Deck Hill Road, approximately 0.25 mile south of its intersection with Greenway Road. These
improvements will:
Install a new raw water supply and intake to supply the Town's future needs
Improve water treatment plant which is old, problematic, underrated and operating near 80%
of the rated capacity of the facility
Expand the Town's water treatment works to meet the Town's future needs
There have been 0.174 acre of wetland impacts identified, 0.141 acre of which will be permanently
impacted and 0.033 acre will be temporarily impacted. Of the 596 linear stream feet of impacts, only
95 linear feet will be permanently impacted while 501 linear feet will be temporarily impacted. The
proposed raw water transmission main and booster pump stations are routed along roadsides and
existing utility easements throughout nearly their entire length to almost eliminate the need for new
land clearing. By using horizontal directional drilling, impacts to the South Fork New River will be
minimized. The expanded WTP will be built on previously cleared land adjacent to the existing WTP,
which will also eliminate the need for new land clearing. Culverts that are installed will be designed to
616 Colonnade Dr
Charlotte, NC 28205
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.wkdickson.com
Transportation • Water Resources • Urban Development • Geomatics

PCN — Boone Raw Water Intake and Transmission Line
Page 2
allow fish passage at low flow and maintain aquatic ecological connectivity. Stream and wetland
credits for the permanent impacts have been requested from the NC Ecological Enhancement Program.
On June 24, 2010, the State Office of the US Department of Agriculture Rural Development released a
Finding of No Significant Impact for the project. During the early phases of project planning, a
population of the NC Special Concern spike (Elliptio dilatata) was located at the preferred and most
feasible intake location. The NC Wildlife Resources Agency and NC Natural Heritage Program
requested that a relocation of mussels be conducted at the preferred water intake site in order to
minimize project related impacts to this population. The mussels will be relocated to another site with
existing muscle populations. There were no other impacts to Threatened or Endangered species which
was confirmed by the Asheville office of the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
In response to comments from the NC State Historic Preservation Office, a formal archaeological
investigation was conducted in all proposed disturbance areas outside existing NC Department of
Transportation maintained rights of way. Based on the formal investigations, there will be no impacts
to significant archaeological resources and no adverse impacts to significant historical resources.
A floodplain analysis was conducted to determine if the construction of the new raw water intake
pump station and access road would significantly raise the 100 -year flood level. Based on this analysis,
there will be "No Rise" to the base flood water- surface elevation.
I appreciate your assistance facilitating the timely and complete review of this important public
infrastructure project's PCN.
Should you have questions, or require clarification on any point, please call.
Sincerely,
W.K. Dickson & Co., Inc.
Ward Marotti
Senior Project Manager
Enclosures
cc: Karen Higgins - NCDENR
WD
IICKSON

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name Town of Boone Water System Improvements
2. Name of Property Owner /Applicant: Town of Boone
3. Name of Consultant /Agent: WK Dickson / Ward Marotti
*Agent authorization needs to be attached
4. Related /Previous Action ID number(s): N/A
5. Site Address: Brownwood Road
7. City: Boone
8. County: Watauga and Ashe
9. Lat: 36.247473 Long: - 81.558917 (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name: Todd, Deep Gap, and Boone quadrangles
11. Waterway: South Fork New River
12. Watershed: New River (HUC 05050001)
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 12
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre - Application Request
The following information will be completed by the Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:
Begin Date

"I0� WAS �G
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes X❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X❑ Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Town of Boone Water System Improvements
2b.
County:
Watauga and Ashe
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Town of Boone
2d.
Subdivision name:
NA
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
Brownwood Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Watuaga County, NC
3f.
Telephone no.:
828- 268 -6200
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
John Ward, III
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Town of Boone
4d.
Street address:
567 W. King Street
4e.
City, state, zip:
Boone, NC 28607
4f.
Telephone no.:
828- 268 -6200
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
john.ward @townofboone.net
5.
Agent /Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Ward Marotti
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
5c.
Street address:
616 Colonnade Drive
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC, 28205
5e.
Telephone no.:
704 - 334 -5348
5f.
Fax no.:
704- 334 -0078
5g.
Email address:
wmarotti @wkdickson.com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
2942583170000 and 2951073927000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.247473 Longitude: - 81.558917
1 c.
Property size:
acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
South Fork New River
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS- IV;HQW, CA: C +:
2c.
River basin:
New River (HUC 05050001 and 03040101)
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
See attached narrative.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.39
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,500
3d.
See
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
attached narrative.
3e.
See
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
attached narrative.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary X❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Ward Marotti
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other: WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
19 July, 2011
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The project's original permit application was submitted in August 2012. The attached represents the updated design.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
See attached narrative.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
See attached narrative.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T )
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes /No
B2 -
Yes /No
B3 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See attached narrative.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See attached narrative.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
X❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
95 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.141 acres
4f.
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h.
Comments: See attached narrative.
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
21.2%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Due to the nature and percent imperviousness of the project, all that is needed for the portion of this project requiring a 404/401 permit is an Erosion
and Sediment Control Permit. See attached documentation for approval of the project site and the criteria
for meeting that approval. A Stormwater
Management
Plan for improvements to the water treatment plant, which will have no impacts to wetlands and waters, has been approved.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The stormwater management plan for the water treatment plant located in Boone, NC consists of a hydrologic analysis for the 10 -year 24 -hour
frequency storm event for pre- & post- development conditions. The proposed increase in impervious area
associated with building additions, a
covered
clearwell, and new pavement results in increases of runoff for the post - development 10 -year 24 -hour frequency storm event. In order to
reduce post - development peak flows to pre - development peak flows for the 10 -year storm event, two stormwater
management facilities (dry detention
ponds)
are proposed within the site plan.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NCDWQ - Sue Homewood
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Boone
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑X Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑X HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑X Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑X Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) On June 24, 2010, the State Office of the US Department of Agriculture Rural
❑Q Yes ❑ No
Comments: Development released a Finding of No Significant Impact for this project (attached).
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes ❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
On June 24, 2010, the state office of the US Department of Agriculture, Rural Development issued a finding of no significant impact for this project.
Local land use ordinances and regulations that help minimize adverse environmental impacts of new development are discussed in the Mitigation
Summary section of this document, including floodplain development, subdivisions and manufactured home parks, stream buffers outside water supply
watersheds, and water connection policies. Pursuant to requirements in water supply watersheds, allowable land use, including development density,
upstream of the proposed intake, will have to be modified to protect water quality, after the use classification is approved. The resulting restrictions will
help preserve water quality and aesthetics in the Todd and Brownwood areas of Ashe County.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The Town currently supplies an average of 1.8 MGD (2.6 MGD maximum day) to a population of about 16,400. This population includes many
university students that live off - campus and use Town water. This current system average day demand is anticipated to grow by the year
2030 to 2.75 MGD. Assuming the potential for 0.5 MGD for the Town of Blowing Rock's emergency use and 1.0 MGD of unallocated reserve, the
future 2030 average day demand for planning purposes should be 4.25 MGD (6.8 MGD maximum day). Standards for design of water treatment
facilities recommend that the facilities be able to deliver the maximum day design therefore we have utilized 6.8 MGD for our future 2030 supply and
treatment capacity.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database, correspondence with /review by USFWS and NCWRC (see attached),
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes M No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See attached narrative.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑Y Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
In accordance with floodplain development requirements. an analysis was completed that concluded there will be "no rise" to the base flood water -
surface elevation (attached).
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood Insurance Risk Maps and No Rise evaulation (attached)
John Ward, III
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Appli ant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's sign ure is valid only if an authorization
letter from the a icant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

PCN Narrative
Town of Boone Water System Improvements
Town of Boone Public Utilities
Nationwide Permit 12
Pre - Construction Notification
Name and Address of Applicant:
Town of Boone Public Utilities
John Ward
567 W. King Street
Boone, NC 28607
Section B. Project Information & Prior Project History
B.3a. Existing Conditions and General Land Use
The Town of Boone currently operates a 3.0 million gallons per day (mgd) conventional water
treatment plant. According to available 2008 data, the Town currently supplies an average daily
demand (ADD) of 1.8 MGD (2.6 MGD maximum day - MDD) to a population of about 16,400.
This population includes many university students that live off - campus and use Town water. This
current system average day demand (ADD) is anticipated to grow by the year 2030 to 2.75 MGD.
Assuming the potential for 0.5 MGD emergency allocation to the Town of Blowing Rock and 1.0
MGD of unallocated reserve for unincorporated areas of the County, its other municipalities, and
industry, the future 2030 average day demand (ADD) for planning purposes should be 4.25 MGD
(6.8 MGD maximum day).
The WTP expansion will be contained entirely within existing WTP and no impacts to direct land
use are anticipated. The intake pump station and its associated access road will permanently
impact approximately five acres of active agricultural land. The surrounding agricultural use will
not be impacted. Where raw water transmission mains cross agricultural fields and utility and
transportation rights of way, the pre- construction use will be restored.
The Environmental Assessment describes existing biological resources throughout the WWTP
service area in detail, including threatened and endangered species and a detailed flow impact
evaluation.
B.3d: Purpose of Proposed Work
The Town of Boone needs to complete improvements to their raw water supply and water
treatment system. The issues which need to be addressed through the completion of a capital
improvements project include:
- Find an additional source of water supply to augment the Town's existing water supply
intakes
- Install a new raw water supply and intake to supply the Town's future needs
- Improve water treatment plant which is old, problematic, underrated and operating near
80% of the rated capacity of the facility
- Expand the Town's water treatment works to meet the Town's future needs

B.3e: Project Description
The proposed raw water intake pump station (30 feet by 50 feet) will be constructed along the
south bank of the South Fork New River approximately 0.5 mile upstream of the Cranberry Springs
Road Bridge in Watauga County. It will pump raw water from the South Fork New River and be
located at the bottom of an existing slope, at the edge of an existing agricultural field.
A sand eductor and pump will be provided to allow sand to be removed from the wetwell back to
the river. Each intake line will be equipped with a shut -off valve in the wetwell and a backwash
line from the backwash pump to allow each line to be backwashed at 4 MGD, or twice the intake
capacity. Backwashing will be able to be programmed to occur any time during the day or night,
which will minimize or eliminate impacts to recreational use of the river.
The raw water intake will be an infiltration gallery (approximately 120 feet by 30 feet) that will be
installed in the South Fork New River, approximately five feet below the existing channel
elevation. The infiltration gallery will be entirely in Watauga County, and have screened intakes
that will be sized to keep intake velocities at the screen surface less than 0.5 feet per second. The
screens will be backfilled with gravel under graded stone with large rocks sized and installed atop
the gravel and stone to protect the intake. Because the channel will be returned to original slope
and contour following construction, and the gallery will be underwater, permanent aesthetic and
recreational impacts will not occur.
Transmission lines will convey raw water approximately 2.6 miles from the intake site, south along
Brownwood Road (NC 1359) to the booster pump station. Throughout most of the
Brownwood Road alignment the lines will be installed under existing pavement. Where necessary,
they will be routed close to the existing edge of pavement. Lines will be entirely in the
Brownwood Road right of way. Transmission lines will follow US 421 for approximately 6.1 miles,
cross the South Fork New River immediately upstream of the existing bridge, and turn south along
Charlie Hollar Road. They will follow Charlie Hollar Road for approximately 0.7 mile, cross the
South Fork New River, and parallel an existing gravity sewer interceptor along a Town of Boone
greenway trail for approximately 1.5 miles, before discharging into an existing raw water
transmission line that serves the Town's existing water treatment plant.

Section C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland Impact
Type of
Type of Wetland
Forested
Type of
Area of
Number
Impact
Jurisdiction
Impact
Permanent (P)
Corps (404, 10),
(acres)
or Temporary
(T)
or
DWQ (401,
other)
W1 (P)
Land clearing
Bottomland
No
Corps
0.008
Hardwood
Forest
W2 (T)
Land clearing
Bottomland
No
Corps
0.007
Hardwood
Forest
W3 (P)
Culvert
Bottomland
No
Corps
0.022
Hardwood
Forest
W4 (T)
Land clearing
Bottomland
No
Corps
0.009
Hardwood
Forest
W5 (P)
Culvert
Bottomland
No
Corps
0.041
Hardwood
Forest
W6 (T)
Land clearing
Bottomland
No
Corps
0.013
Hardwood
Forest
W7 (T)
Land Clearing
Bottomland
No
Corps
0.004
Hardwood
Forest
W8 (P)
Culvert
Bottomland
No
Corps
0.07
Hardwood
Forest
2g. Total Wetland Impacts
0.174
Total Temporary Impacts:
0.033
Total Permanent Impacts:
0.141

C.2h: Description of Proposed Wetland Impacts
Proposed Wetland Impacts 1 through 7 will occur at the access road and intake site. The temporary
impacts within the temporary construction corridor will total 0.033 acres. Because these
herbaceous wetlands will be returned to their original slope and contour and replanted with native
herbaceous species, these will not be permanent impacts. The permanent impacts at the access
road and intake site will total 0.063 acres where culverts will be installed and 0.008 acres where
the land will remained cleared. Proposed Wetland Impact 8 will occur at the booster pump station
site. This permanent impact will total 0.07 acres where a culvert will be installed. The temporary
impacts will total 0.033 acres and the permanent impacts will total 0.141 acres for a total of 0.174
acres of impacts.
3a.
Stream Impact
Number
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
3b.
Type of
Impact
3c.
Stream Name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
Intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of
Jurisdiction
3f.
Average
Stream
Width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
Length
(linear
feet)
S1 (T)
excavation
Tributary 8
PER
Corps
4
10
S2 (T)
excavation
Hardin Creek
PER
Corps
10
10
S5 (T)
excavation
Tributary 7
PER
Corps
3
75
S6 (P)
culvert
Tributary 7
PER
Corps
3
40
S7 (T)
excavation
Meadow Creek 4
PER
Corps
4
10
S8 (T)
excavation
Tributary 6
PER
Corps
3
10
S9 (T)
excavation
Tributary 5
PER
Corps
6
10
S10 (T)
excavation
Meadow Creek 3
PER
Corps
10
10
S11 (T)
excavation
Meadow Creek 2
PER
Corps
15
10
S12 (P)
culvert
Meadow Creek 1
PER
Corps
5
55
S13 (T)
excavation
Meadow Creek 1
INT
Corps
10
103
S14 (T)
excavation
Tributary 2
PER
Corps
6
13
S15 (T)
excavation
Tributary 1
PER
Corps
5
80
S16 (T)
Intake
gallery
construction
South Fork New River
PER
Corps
100
160
3h. Total Stream and Tributary Impacts
596
Total Temporary Impacts:
Total Permanent Impacts:
501
95
C.3i: Description of Proposed Stream Impacts
The raw water transmission main construction corridor will cross the South Fork New River
at five locations (see plan details). All five crossings will be installed under the channel using the
Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) method, which will insure that the raw water line is at a
minimum depth of 10 feet below the river bed. All HDD operations will stay outside the river
riparian buffer zones. The downstream -most crossing of the South Fork New River (River Crossing
#5) will be located just upstream of the US Hwy 421 bridge. At this location there is a public canoe
access. This is the most upstream canoe access on the South Fork New River. Upstream from this
location a low water bridge and multiple existing aerial sewer crossings inhibit recreational
canoeing. The second river crossing will be located approximately 650 linear feet downstream

from the Casey Lane low -water Town of Boone Water System Improvements — Environmental
Assessment 25 bridge. The three remaining river crossings will cross the South Fork New River
adjacent to existing aerial sewer crossings following the ASU greenway trail. No impacts the South
Fork New River associated with the raw water transmission main are therefore anticipated (see the
detailed flow impact evaluation in Section 3.4.2 of the attached Environmental Assessment).
The raw water transmission main will temporarily impact Tributary 8 to the South Fork New River
(Stream Impact 1) and Hardin Creek (Stream Impact 2). Both crossings will be inside the existing
sanitary sewer gravity interceptor easement, which is actively maintained. No clearing of mature
woody vegetation will be necessary at either of these stream crossings. No permanent impacts will
occur at either stream. Temporary impacts to these streams will be 20 linear feet assuming a 10
foot average trench width.
Between the intake site and Meadow Creek's headwaters, the raw water transmission main
will cross Meadow Creek at three locations (Stream Impacts 7, 10, and 11). It will also cross
Tributary 6 and Tributary 5, tributaries of Meadow Creek (Stream Impacts 8 and 9). These
temporary impacts will total 50 feet. At the booster pump station, an access road will have to be
constructed across Tributary 7, a tributary to Gap Creek. This will result in a 40 foot permanent
stream impact (Stream Impact 6) and a 75 foot temporary stream impact (Stream Impact 5).
An open trenching method will be used across streams between the intake site and US 421, which
consists of Stream Impacts 3, 4, 14, and 15. Because these tributaries are relatively small, during
installation flow will be pumped around the worksite. Following installation, all stream crossings
will be returned to original slope and contour. Because these crossings occur in agricultural areas
or will require no clearing of mature woody vegetation, no permanent impacts will occur at these
crossings.
Where a culvert will be installed at the entrance of the access road there will be a permanent
stream impact totaling 55 feet of stream (Stream Impact 12) and a temporary stream impact totaled
103 feet (Stream Impact 13). To minimize impacts, the culvert will be designed to allow fish
passage at low flow and maintain aquatic ecological connectivity. These details can be seen in
details of the engineering plans attached.
The proposed raw water intake, an infiltration gallery, will be installed below the South Fork New
River's existing channel. Pre - construction elevation, slope, and contour will be restored after
installation, as will the channel's cross - sectional area and flow conditions (see the attached
Environmental Assessment). The resulting 160 foot impact will be temporary (Stream Impact 16).
Approximately 100 feet of the existing narrow treeline along the river's banks will be cleared for
construction. Of that, approximately 15 feet (immediately over the intake pipes) will be
permanently maintained. The balance, approximately 85 feet, will be re- planted with native
riparian trees and shrubs.
PCN Section D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
D.1a & D.1b: Avoidance and minimization
The proposed raw water transmission main and booster pump stations are routed along roadsides
and existing utility easements throughout nearly their entire length to almost eliminate the need for
new land clearing. By using horizontal directional drilling, impacts to the South Fork New River

will be minimized. The expanded WTP will be built on previously cleared land adjacent to the
existing WTP, which will also eliminate the need for new land clearing. Culverts that are installed
will be designed to allow fish passage at low flow and maintain aquatic ecological connectivity.
Additional minor impacts during construction will be minimized by following all relevant Section
404/401 permit conditions and a DENR- approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan.
D.4h: In -lieu Fee Program
In -lieu fee mitigation credits for a total of 95 feet of cold water stream impacts and 0.141 acre of
riparian wetland impacts have been requested from the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Attached is a copy of the in -lieu request form for this project.
Section F. Supplementary Information
F.4a. Available Capacity of the Proposed Facility
The Town currently supplies an average of 1.8 MGD (2.6 MGD maximum day) to a population of
about 16,400. This population includes many university students that live off - campus and use
Town water. This current system average day demand is anticipated to grow by the year
2030 to 2.75 MGD. Assuming the potential for 0.5 MGD for the Town of Blowing Rock's
emergency use and 1.0 MGD of unallocated reserve, the future 2030 average day demand for
planning purposes should be 4.25 MGD (6.8 MGD maximum day). Standards for design of water
treatment facilities recommend that the facilities be able to deliver the maximum day design
therefore we have utilized 6.8 MGD for our future 2030 supply and treatment capacity.
F.7b. Data Sources for Historical or Archaeological Resource Impacts
The following language was taken directly from the EA's sections 3.5.1 and 3.5.2:
In response to SHPO scoping comments a formal archaeological investigation was conducted in all
proposed disturbance areas outside existing NCDOT- maintained rights of way. In response to
concerns over viewshed impacts, a 3d model was created and several alternatives were evaluated.
None of the remaining previously recorded resources in the survey areas will be impacted by the
proposed improvements to the Town of Boone water system.
There will be no direct impacts on historic resource AH524. However, the proposed pump station
will impact this resource's viewshed. Direct project impacts to historic resource AH40 will be
minimal. The proposed water line will cross through a field area within the resource boundaries
but the pipe will be buried and thus pose no viewshed impacts. The proposed pump station will be
visible from the building complex at AH40. To mitigate these viewshed impacts, the pump station
has been designed to resemble a barn. This design will allow the facility to blend into the
agricultural setting without posing an adverse impact to the historic resources.
Construction plans associated with the proposed improvements of the Town of Boone's water
system will not affect significant archaeological resources. Nor will the construction adversely
impact the significant historic resources in the project vicinity.
No further management considerations are deemed necessary.

Stream Impact
Number
Permanent or
Temporary
Length (LF)
Owner /Parcel Info
PIN
1
T
10
State of North Carolina /Appalachian State University; DB: 11 PG 580; PIN: 2910 -66- 8824 -000
2910 -66- 8824 -000
2
T
10
Watagua County PB: 020 PG 445 PIN: 2910 -88- 3456 -OOC
2910 -88- 3456 -000
5
T
75
Town of Boone DB 1488 PG 519 PB 22 PG: 53
2951 -07- 3927 -000
6
P
40
Town of Boone DB 1488 PG 519 PB 22 PG: 53
2951 -07- 3927 -000
7
T
10
Ronald L. Kelley, and wife Sharon K. Kelley BR: 084 PG: 234 PIN: 2942 -70- 4591 -OOC
2942 -70- 4591 -000
8
T
10
Jack & Virginia M. Smith DB: 93 PG: 69 PIN: 2942 -63- 1833 -OOC
2942 -63- 1833 -000
9
T
10
Bonnie Jean Brown BR: 395 PG 315 PIN: 2942 -66- 5677 -OOC
2942 -66 -5677 -000
10
T
10
Jerry & Laura Brown, Mackie L Tucker, Thomas J Brown, Leanna V Brown BR: 1643 PG: 48 PIN: 2942 -84- 3544 -000
2942 -84- 3544 -000
11
T
10
Ronald Sidney Cooper & Donald Lee Cooper BR: 365 PG: 1747 PIN: 2942 -87- 1802 -OOC
2942 -87- 1802 -000
12
P
55
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68- 5570 -000
13
T
103
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68 -5570 -000
14
T
13
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68 -5570 -000
15
T
80
Town of Boone DB: 1425 PG. 405 PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -000. Lot J
2942 -68 -5570 -000
16
T
160
Town of Boone DB: 1425 PG. 405 PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -000. Lot 7
2942 -68 -5570 -000
Wetland Impact
Number
Permanent or
Temporary
Area of Impact
(Acres)
Owner /Parcellnfo
Pin
1
P
0.008
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68 -5570 -000
2
T
0.007
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68 -5570 -000
3
P
0.022
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68- 5570 -000
4
T
0.009
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68 -5570 -000
5
P
0.041
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68 -5570 -000
6
T
0.013
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68 -5570 -000
7
T
0.004
Larry Cooper, Randy Cooper, and Amy Cooper Greer. Remaining portion of DB: 1122 PF 238 PIN 2942 -68- 6039 -000
2942 -68 -5570 -000
8
P
0.07
Town of Boone DB 1488 PG 519 PB 22 PG: 53
2951 -07- 3927 -000

Arj'�;A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, PE Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
September 17, 2012
DWQ# 12 -0776
Watauga /Ashe County
CERTIFIED MAIL: 7011 1570 0001 8545 8517
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Greg Young
Town of Boone
567 W. King Street
Boone, NC 28607
Re: Section 401 Water Quality Certification application
Dear Mr. Young:
On August 15, 2012, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) received a copy of your application for a
401 General Water Quality Certification install a fill in streams and wetlands for the Town of Boone Water System
Improvements in Boone, NC in Watauga County. Additional information is required in order that we may determine your
project's compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500. The Division will require this information in order to process your
application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject properties. Therefore, we will place this project on
hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information, and if we do not receive the additional information
requested below, we will return your application as incomplete. Please provide the following information so that we may
continue to review your project.
1. Please provide a list of any parcels of land which the Town of Boone does not currently own or have easements
on at this time.
2. Please provide a table of impacts for all stream and wetland impact areas that matches the impact area identifiers
with the identifiers used in the stream determination documentation. Please also ensure that the engineering plans
call out impact areas using these identifiers. It is difficult to review this large project with multiple
nomenclatures and/or impact areas without identifiers on the plans.
3. Please provide detailed plan sheets, at a readable scale, of all impact areas that clearly identifies the exact location
of all temporary impacts and permanent impacts using shading/hatching etc. The "call outs" on the existing plan
sheets do not clearly show the exact location of impacts, installation of dewatering measures, sediment and
erosion control measures etc.
4. Please provide detailed plan sheets at a readable scale that clearly shows all sediment and erosion control
measures in/near jurisdictional areas. All sediment and erosion control measures proposed within jurisdictional
areas must be shown as temporary or permanent impacts on the 401 application documents.
5. At culvert P -1, please explain the need for temporary impacts of 50 feet upstream and downstream of the culvert.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston -Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston - Salem, North Carolina 27107 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1- 877 - 623 -6748 NOrthCarofi 1a
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 'JVatuyrally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer �/ y L

Town of Boone Water System Improvements
DWQ# 12 -0776
September 17, 2012
Page 2 of 3
6. At culvert P -1 a proposed riffle grade control appears to be a riprap energy dissipater apron. Please clarify the
justification for this measure. If this measure is being provided as a grade control structure only, please provide
reference information/justification to indicate that long riffles of this design are appropriate for this stream.
7. At culvert P -1, please provide a design for a floodplain bench above and below the floodplain culvert. A
floodplain bench will be required to ensure that the stream channel is of natural width and depth upstream and
downstream of this double barrel culvert.
Please provide clarification of the dewatering technique for Meadow Creek. If a pump around will be utilized,
please provide discussion/justification for aquatic passage during construction. If a temporary channel will be
constructed, please provide a detail for the temporary channel.
9. On Page G2.5 and Page G2.6, permanent wetland impacts are identified for culvert installations. Please clarify if
there will be any temporary wetland impacts in these areas to facilitate culvert installation and /or to address
sediment and erosion control requirements. Please modify all plans and impact tables appropriately if temporary
impacts are proposed.
10. On Page G2.6 and G2.7, please clarify the need for road "stubs" at regular intervals along this access road. Please
also clarify the need for temporary impacts to wetlands and streams for these "stub" areas.
11. On Page G2.7, please explain the need for temporary impacts to 80 linear feet of stream. It appears this area may
be impacted from roadway shoulder construction. Please provide avoidance and minimization justification
(headwalls, adjustments to the road alignment, etc).
12. On Page G3.3, please clearly identify the exact location of all temporary impacts and permanent impacts. Please
also indicate all temporary impacts from sediment and erosion control measures that will be required.
13. For the culvert on Page G3.3, please clarify whether a pump around will be utilized as the dewatering technique
for this culvert.
14. For the culvert on Page G3.3, please provide a design for a floodplain bench above and below the culvert. A
floodplain bench will be required to ensure that the stream channel is of natural width and depth upstream and
downstream of this culvert.
15. For the culvert on Page G3.3, please explain the need for specified length of temporary impacts upstream and
downstream of the culvert.
16. For the culvert on Page G3.3, a proposed riffle grade control appears to be a riprap energy dissipater apron.
Please clarify the justification for this measure. If this measure is being provided as a grade control structure
only, please provide reference information/justification to indicate that long riffles of this design are appropriate
for this stream.
17. On Page G4.1, a detail is provided for Stream Bed Control. It appears that this detail is proposed for all
temporarily impacted streams. The Division requires that all temporarily impacted streams be restored to natural
conditions to the maximum extent practical. To that end, for small streams with low flow it is the Divisions
experience that riprap bed control is unnecessary. Please provide justification based on size of the stream, slope
of the stream, and /or predicted stream flow velocities for all areas that are to be restored using the detail provided
on Page G4.1. Please provide a natural channel detail with vegetation and/or erosion control matting on the
streambanks for all other stream impact areas.

Town of Boone Water System Improvements
DWQ# 12 -0776
September 17, 2012
Page 3 of 3
Please respond in writing within 30 calendar days of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this information to Sue
Homewood at the address on this letterhead, and a copy to Ian McMillan N. C. Division of Water Quality, Wetlands /401
Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650. If we do not hear from you in 30 calendar days,
we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will return this application as incomplete.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or protected
buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the
Division. If you have any questions, please contact me at 336 - 771 -4964 or sue.homewood @ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
DWQ Winston -Salem Regional Office
cc: Tasha McCormick, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office (via email)
Ward Mariotti, WK Dickson & co, Inc. (via email)
DWQ Winston -Salem Regional Office
DWQ Wetlands /401 Unit

Ph W I<
WDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
26 March 2015
USDA Raw Water Project for the Town of Boone
Section 401 Water Quality Certification Application
NCDENR Review Comments - September 171h, 2012
DWQ # 12 -0776
1. Comment: Please provide a list of any parcels of land which the Town of Boone does not
currently own or have easements on at this time.
Response: Impacted parcels have been listed and attached to the PCN.
2. Comment: Please provide a table of impacts for all stream and wetland impact areas that
matches the impact area identifiers with the identifiers used in the stream determination
documentation. Please also ensure that the engineering plans call out impact areas using
these identifiers. It is difficult to review this large project with multiple nomenclatures
and /or impact areas without identifiers on the plans.
Response: Sheet G2.0 and Sheet G3.0 impact tables have been updated to match identifiers
in the JD map. Sheet references for location of impacts have been added to the table.
3. Comment: Please provide detailed plan sheets, at a readable scale, of all impact areas that
clearly identifies the exact location of all temporary impacts and permanent impacts using
shading/hatching etc. The "call outs" on the existing plan sheets do not clearly show the
exact location of impacts, installation of dewatering measures, sediment and erosion control
measures etc.
Response: All impacts, dewatering measures, and erosion and sediment control measures
within the impact area have been highlighted for easier identification.
4. Comment: Please provide detailed plan sheets at a readable scale that clearly shows all
sediment and erosion control measures in /near jurisdictional areas. All sediment and
erosion control measures proposed within jurisdictional areas must be shown as temporary
or permanent impacts on the 401 application documents.
Response: Impacts and erosion and sediment and control measures are highlighted for
identification.
616 Colonnade Drive
Charlotte, NC 28205
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.wkdickson.com Aviation • Water Resources • Urban Development . Geomatics

26 March 2015
Town of Boone Raw Water Intake — DENR Comment/Response
Page 2
5. Comment: At culvert P -1, please explain the need for temporary impacts of 50 feet
upstream and downstream of the culvert.
Response: The proposed temporary impacts to Meadow Creek associated with the
installation of Culvert P -1 (Impact S12) are included in the plans to account for the
access, preparation, and dewatering required to construct the culvert. While much of
the site preparation and installation will be accomplished using equipment located on
the non - jurisdictional portions of Meadow Creek's banks, access below Meadow Creek's
ordinary high water mark will be necessary to properly prepare and position the
structure. While temporary impacts are likely to be less than shown in plan sheet G2.5,
the maximum anticipated disturbance footprint was included.
6. Comment: At culvert P -1 a proposed riffle grade control appears to be a riprap energy
dissipater apron. Please clarify the justification for this measure. If this measure is being
provided as a grade control structure only, please provide reference
information /justification to indicate that long riffles of this design are appropriate for this
stream.
Response: WKD has proposed this method of stream channel reinforcement downstream of
proposed culverts on previous plans to help reinforce the existing stream bed. The stone
and rip -rap are all set below grade and have enough voids to allow sediment from the
stream to settle in for a final product that is more natural than typical rip -rap installation
that is poured along the full width of the channel and up the banks. The Riffle Grade
control section proposes live stakes along the banks above the ordinary high water mark,
also for a more natural channel that is reinforced.
7. Comment: At culvert P -1, please provide a design for a floodplain bench above and below
the floodplain culvert. A floodplain bench will be required to ensure that the stream
channel is of natural width and depth upstream and downstream of this double barrel
culvert.
Response:
Culvert P -1 consists of a double barrel system with the culverts designated as P -1A and P-
1B. P -1A is set at a lower elevation than P -1B so that the natural width of the base flow of
the channel is maintained and flows through only P -1A. The upstream and downstream
areas of P -1B are graded at a higher elevation to maintain the base flow channel width. The
elevation grade differences of the two culverts are detailed on Sheet G2.14 of the plan set.
WD
IICKSON

26 March 2015
Town of Boone Raw Water Intake — DENR Comment/Response
Page 3
The difference in final flow depth between P -1A and P -1B vertically is 1.0'. We believe that
this depth is ideal for dissipating velocity and shear stresses upstream and downstream of
the culvert as storm events begin to increase the stream water surface elevation above the
low flow depth. One foot normal water depth passing through P -1A is adequate to
maintain aquatic function and ecological conveyance.
8. Comment: Please provide clarification of the dewatering technique for Meadow Creek. If a
pump around will be utilized, please provide discussion /justification for aquatic passage
during construction. If a temporary channel will be constructed, please provide a detail for
the temporary channel.
Response: A Pump around is proposed during the installation of the culvert along Meadow
Creek as detailed on Sheet G0.7. Continuous aquatic passage will not be provided during
the temporary pump around operations; however pump around operations will be
brief. This method has been selected over a temporary diversion channel. Because of the
depth and volume of excavation that would be required to construct a temporary diversion
channel around the proposed construction site, and the significant erosion and resulting
sediment loading and Total Suspended Solids concentration in the downstream reach of
Meadow Creek and South Fork of the New River, this alternative was not selected.
The proposed brief interruption to aquatic passage at the culvert will have insignificant
impacts to Meadow Creek's or the South Fork of the New River's ecological function.
9. Comment: On Page G2.5 and Page G2.6, permanent wetland impacts are identified for
culvert installations. Please clarify if there will be any temporary wetland impacts in these
areas to facilitate culvert installation and /or to address sediment and erosion control
requirements. Please modify all plans and impact tables appropriately if temporary impacts
are proposed.
Response: No temporary wetland impacts have been added. The impacts at Culvert P -3 are
all properly identified — the edge of the delineated wetlands on the upstream side of the
culvert is shown as permanently impacted in its entirety. The limits of disturbance at
Culvert P -4 have been adjusted to exclude unnecessary temporary impacts upstream and
downstream of the proposed culvert. Hatch patterns have been updated on all sheets for
better contrast between existing wetlands, temporary impact to wetlands, and permanent
impact to wetlands. The Legend on Sheet G2.0 has been updated to indicate these hatch
changes.
WD
IICKSON

26 March 2015
Town of Boone Raw Water Intake — DENR Comment/Response
Page 4
10. Comment: On Page G2.6 and G2.7, please clarify the need for road "stubs" at regular
intervals along this access road. Please also clarify the need for temporary impacts to
wetlands and streams for these "stub" areas.
Response: The road stubs at stations 10 +00 and 20 +00 are required for emergency vehicle
turnaround. No impacts are required for these turnarounds located on the north side of the
road.
The ditch stubs located on the south side of the road at temporary wetland impacts W1, W2,
and W4 are necessary to direct runoff from roadside ditches into the nearest channels.
Configuration of swales (open flow channels to the maximum extent practicable) is a
condition of the storm water permit. W1 has been revised to be a permanent impact. The
plan and impact tables have been updated to reflect this.
11. Comment: On Page G2.7, please explain the need for temporary impacts to 80 linear feet of
stream. It appears this area may be impacted from roadway shoulder construction. Please
provide avoidance and minimization justification (headwalls, adjustments to the road
alignment, etc).
Response: The alignment of the proposed ditch that leads to the location of Impact S15 is
necessary to minimize erosion from channel flow as it transitions into the perennial stream
ditch line. The only way to shorten this temporary impact would be to turn the ditch
channel perpendicular to the perennial stream channel. But this would cause the channel to
be more likely to erode as the stormwater has to make the 90 degree turn transition into the
perennial stream channel.
Head walls would have to collect stormwater upstream into a closed system where flow
velocities would increase at an outfall set at the perennial stream, potentially increasing
erosion. For this reason, and to minimize the closed systems required on the site due to the
stormwater permit requirements, a head wall is not a desirable option in this location.
12. Comment: On Page G3.3, please clearly identify the exact location of all temporary impacts
and permanent impacts. Please also indicate all temporary impacts from sediment and
erosion control measures that will be required.
Response: Hatch patterns have been updated on all sheets for better contrast between
existing wetlands, temporary impact to wetlands, and permanent impact to wetlands. The
Legend on Sheet G3.0 has been updated to indicate these hatch changes. All impacts
WD
IICKSON

26 March 2015
Town of Boone Raw Water Intake — DENR Comment/Response
Page 5
necessary for construction of this booster pump station are shown on Sheet G3.3, including
areas needed for erosion and sediment controls.
13. Comment: For the culvert on Page G3.3, please clarify whether a pump around will be
utilized as the dewatering technique for this culvert.
Response: Sheet G3.4 notes that the stream bypass details on Sheet G0.7 will be used for
this culvert.
14. Comment: For the culvert on Page G3.3, please provide a design for a floodplain bench
above and below the culvert. A floodplain bench will be required to ensure that the stream
channel is of natural width and depth upstream and downstream of this culvert.
Response:
The culvert is designed with a concrete baffle that directs low flows in the channel through a
more narrow area within the culvert that mimics the existing channel width. As the 2 -year
and 10 -year storms collect flow and build up the water surface elevation in the channel, this
4' width within the culvert rises and expands to the full 10' width. The design of the culvert
W/ baffles is intended to mimic the existing channel as depth and width increase as the
water surface elevation increases.
15. Comment: For the culvert on Page G3.3, please explain the need for specified length of
temporary impacts upstream and downstream of the culvert.
Response: See sheet G3.5 that shows the location of the proposed waterlines that must cross
the stream both upstream and downstream of the culvert. The temporary impact is there to
provide adequate space for trench installation of the 24" DIP.
In addition, the riffle grade control will also be installed downstream of the culvert and is
considered a temporary impact as it will eventually fill in naturally within the channel, but
will serve to reinforce the culvert outfall.
Grading in the areas upstream and downstream of the culvert shown at 2.5:1 slopes is
necessary due to the steep cross slope of the site. Tying out the proposed grades while
maintaining an adequate culvert cross - section capacity for the 25 -year storm event severely
limited flexibility of where the culvert could be placed.
16. Comment: For the culvert on Page G3.3, a proposed riffle grade control appears to be a
riprap energy dissipater apron. Please clarify the justification for this measure. If this
WD
IICKSON

26 March 2015
Town of Boone Raw Water Intake - DENR Comment/Response
Page 6
measure is being provided as a grade control structure only, please provide reference
information /justification to indicate that long riffles of this design are appropriate for this
stream.
Response: See response to comment #6.
17. Comment: On Page G4.1, a detail is provided for Stream Bed Control. It appears that this
detail is proposed for all temporarily impacted streams. The Division requires that all
temporarily impacted streams be restored to natural conditions to the maximum extent
practical. To that end, for small streams with low flow it is the Divisions experience that
riprap bed control is unnecessary. Please provide justification based on size of the stream,
slope of the stream, and /or predicted stream flow velocities for all areas that are to be
restored using the detail provided on Page G4.1. Please provide a natural channel detail
with vegetation and /or erosion control matting on the streambanks for all other stream
impact areas.
Response: It has been WKD's experience that in response to large precipitation events
even small, low gradient streams convey flows with high velocity and sheer stress.
Without adequate protection, channels that have been disturbed (e.g. trenching for
installation of transmission lines and temporary culverts) are at significant risk of
erosion, which results in permanent negative impacts to the disturbed locations, as well
as increases in Total Suspended Solids and sedimentation within receiving waters
downstream. In order to reduce on -site erosion, and downstream TSS loading and
sedimentation, stabilization of disturbed channels is required. Because it is difficult to
restore channels' pre- disturbance density /compaction, as well as maintain stable
connections to undisturbed areas, a stable substrate is installed within the lowest 1.5 feet
of the restored reach. To restore and maintain the pre- disturbance texture and stability of
the upper -most channel substrate, native material is mixed with stone. Even if the native
material is washed away during storm events (which it certainly would be if stabilization
was not the focus of restoration), the course and stable substrate allows for native
materials to aggrade over time. If storm events sufficient to degrade the replaced native
material were realized, and stability was not the focus of restoration, further degradation
(both lateral and vertical) would occur. As shown in Sheet G0.7 Details 4 and 5, all
stream bank stabilizations will include erosion control matting and live staking, which
will be installed below the ordinary high water mark and extend past the newly graded
top of bank (24" minimum width).
WD
IICKSON

Statement of Compliance with Session Law 2009 -337 An Act to Promote
the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks and SL 2011 -343.
(link to SL 2009 -3371 (link to SL 2011 -343)
Prior to accessing the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) In -Lieu Fee Mitigation
Program, all applicants requesting wetlands, stream and /or riparian buffer mitigation are now
required by law to comply with Session Law 2009 -337 An Act to Promote the Use of
Compensatory Mitigation Banks and Session Law 2011 -343. All requests submitted on or
after June 27, 2011 MUST include this form signed and dated by the permit applicant or an
authorized agent. Please refer to DENR's implementation Policy for more detailed guidance.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand SL- 2009 -337 and SL- 2011 -343 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with their requirements. I understand that participation in the
NCEEP is voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
El Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local government
meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143 - 214.11 (as amended by SL 2011-
343) and is not required to purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
Ei There are no listed mitigation banks with the credit type I need located in the
hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWR list)
Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have been
contacted and credits are not currently available.
The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a mitigation
bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review
credits were not available at the time the application was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
Bank
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private mitigation
banks regarding credit availability.
I have read and understand EEP's refund policies (attached)
initial here
Signatlure of Applicant or Agent
411,
Date
Town of Boone Water System Improvements
Project Name
,John Ward.Ill
Printed Name
Watauga County, NC
Location
Print Farm

NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN -LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM Revised June 18, 2014
Complete requested information, sign and date, email to kelly.wiliiamsP_ncdenr.gov . Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes (location map, address or lat long is required). Information submitted is subject to NC Public Records Law and may be
requested by third parties. Review meetings are held on Tuesday afternoons.
CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT'S AGENT APPLICANT
1. Business /Company Name
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. ; Town of Boone
2. Contact Person
Ward Marotti 567 W. King St.
3. Street Address or P O Box
616 Colonnade Drive Boone, NC, 28607
4. City, State, Zip
Charlotte, NC, 28205 ; John Ward, III
5. Telephone Number
7043345348 828- 268 -6200
6. E -Mail Address
wmarotti @wkdickson.com E john.ward @townofboone.com
PROJECT INFORMATION
7. Project Name
Town of Boone Water System Improvements
8. Project Location (nearest town, city)
Boone, NC
9. Lat -Long Coordinates or attach a map
36.247473 N; 81.558917 W; see map below
10. County
Watauga and Ashe
11. River Basin & Cataloging Unit (8- digit)
New River (05050001)
(See Note 1)
12. Project Type 'indicate owner type and
Owner Type: Government Private
write in project
p j type (e.g school, church. retail,
residential, apartments. road. utilities, military,
Project Type: tilities
etc.)"
13. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
0.141
14. Non - Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
15. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
16. Stream Impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
warm ! Cool
Cold
;
95
17. Riparian Buffer Impact (sq. ft.)
Include subwatershed if Jordan or Falls Lake:
Zone 1: Zone 2;
18. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts
i NCDWR:
USACE;Tasha McCormick Other: DWQ: Sue Homewood
Check (d) below if this request is for a:
By signing below, the applicant is confirming they h ,
revision to a current acceptance
read and understand EEP's refund policy posted at
nceep.net and attached to this form.
renewal of an expired acceptance
Signature Ap lic nt qr uthorized Agent:
fJ 2,
extension of unexpired acceptance
,L
Date:
Note 1: For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, visit:www.nceeo.net or contact EEP
Direct questions to Kelly Williams at 919 -707 -8915 or kelly.williamsPncdenr.gov or to ESP's front desk at 919- 707 -8976

VTODD FLEETW
tt..
HPLETT
Sources: Esri, DeLorme,
i }µy NAVTEQ, USGS, NRCAN,
EL011.1114G METI, PC, TomTom
a
��q-AY,6
R,v,i et%
,fit *�21e fi L�,s
hAu=on rM1t redr.
r
tV' p
ii��tv't
9
Oil 4C{�
s,
R%dge Rc,
Gld�s 4'l� 'te C��a
421o44'r
�J
N
� rtl
�tttdlil\ Rd
Y
eVN
as
a
N
a
'State Fafln Rd
Rd KeN,440od L; Batnhao Rc1
WDICKSON
06 Clade Rd
4�
1,
tp
AShe
Watauga
at d
O
P.
�f if
Gap Rdg
Cartaj
tl e
fi
1
r
�t
a
Figure 1
Town of Boone
Proposed Water System Improvements
Vicinity Map
Miles
0 0.25 0.5 1
1 in = 0.5 miles
\k Creek
7
t
r,.
u
8�1\E
LL 14
Creek �.
a
�tf \e �wrel Rd
0
/,tl ��i4�
Legend
Streams
Roads
Project Area

'� , ° I it 5 !i''Ls I 1, r 67 __ s s' -. ,' x} t r a
s
1 _ I� 'S _6 - y r - 5 {
421 t. �s , ( afl .+ 3 a , �r,n
+ {� - _ -`, ti k r lr k, I,.,- M1 � ~ s . i y } ' k -.
r
- f! � i 6 , � — `:e� -»�.- ,mac 'S' r. . % LY
i
. �. _
21 21 R "# i .
:
:�
I :+ s _ .
,.
r# _ i
. .. _. _. .
w
.� , , .°
._
. ,. ' , °• ,
1. 21 a_�' y f s' `
,.i ,. v _ If �; . .
/ h
i
�.�y fiY '
,.. n ::
W OCR " . :. .
r
r.:• , , ...;.:
i 2 - -
E +eyr�r sEy a I tx }af x I' v i'r�
ll �r
4YY t J .'
}
:: : _
i 1 ' „ _ -"
. - __ _ _ ,
111 y % .
• J-
- 3 _ _ ..
�� ..."
P
j. . , 4 :
_
,,. .. �_.: .. .. ...,.. x ., w* ..f: - ..
4 f
�a' t 77 t
'. :a IIyS `�} {. _.. f 11 ti; - 1 I'S. ri_ . 1 � ,- q S.. i- bra _ '
_ I FI "lI
C
J -
`k'r Isl' ISf i y.:. �+� i ✓ I ! i
k
° ° c; a 1"O',
J
f
4
�11T,
4 '� ! ,' % ,
.,- -. .
..� rC
by
car y F
s
..," S - i i % 4 .: - , -
n r
.. -'
d
�r
- _. ___r..... ,1 -
_
-,. , _.. % rr +,s ,,::.a ,x,q. •..rte - ,.R.'. _ ., - F ! g .° .. : r ktyf '� Y-- ".-:"I , .~, 1. '` *,.. w,7 r .] s i , fir, .. f? I _ �'; "�z T rI`-{ }. " . 9 f f,5- �, _ �. 3 � �-
a
<-
°'f, ."� ..'f:. -- � - °'. ,':r. '• r, .:. _ .. .,).. �,,'.:,, ♦I :kw ♦ya ,. ,k , I . ..rte i °
O{
r: "
t'
d
�f I. x
I ,, ,-4 kr' k exit }s I I sr.?i 1 ,r.:/'xti -, r. ` ?T�.� ,•.t - - _ �, %
} 111', * N r is \ir .%;s .,4 Y .i '
15y. - Iv -., A - h ,v
N.y
•,.
NY "Z2' I I s r , y . -A I
.' .0 asset , , �vx y l , + S� 1 ,L
,0 .cam t ° #`
:_ P. -
.. ; - , . ..
x�
qa
- { �* f
r I.
t .. ...,.. r M1 ._
..,- .. ,-
,
,
\ °� - _ r - _
P 5. .
v.., -rte - . �, .'r ,
,, _ . - -
. ti
W x..r fd: IPa __ ._ ri xrya� i ,
% , y -,
4 ft.
.
j
_. { k i , ° 7. r ,
.:,
y
�. i Lr I I rt . r..
..r,. ....r , v •,:
,
_.
{�' i, 1. , ,.rpa° ,s ,..y,154 , '.I 'l 24'y.. .. % I _, , i.''
/N
. _
I, f
t - a. I. '.k .'x'kz'I.,.> _ {Ir` +f 'r' -ks` , Iy sa -, i' s '(`
- -4r
v y:
- `,,� _
.
iJ! i , 7 C f ,< aW ry 't a r .
rr f r , y "
y� r. , - ,�: wry ' e -i4rt,'4° .y� I { - -
' a ,: ,,� . , I l o , '{,z— r , " - > ` . � -✓ rte '� . t
x
7.r i.$,., s x k` st - :�?r��y4i -r - ,
1 'fit _ { } �' #r..."}'� _ rf :la - :.: M1y l ,
-.' i -dr y % _Y 1[
x '- :
s f � lk v � .:• ti^ .
r5
n
I ) i..• �. - ! • .. ". ; � gyp, f zt«
I
.
. I� '•` -; x °- I { ids`,` + -' s - -
3
v ..,, r� Y 1 4 �x
II I ,
+`,�} .
}
:.
k
, . , . r,.f ;, 9 ._'X % �` S �� , 4 r ? - it I - A4s
r
'°7'- =' s r r ,it' _ Ala. �r i''st= - '.ss
s_ d. , }
F 1 a �
•.
4 -� .. - n-_kg,lf a.
} rr5
f f,- pia ^4�;.. �.
v
.. ,%i , j, . , - . - . L - " . d* sii , +t/if z f' rI s�
- - ., .� .
-,
�. • _
E v- f,, e. f , � v_. ,r,. - - -� ..,_..., -,1 ': is :i'is'!� - - --
,.! t -„ _ '
J. /r�Y x
.�t - . . -
v a
- ,: .�j - F
ry
u� h
r
t I
y
5
_ ' .,. ' -j $"a ._',1_. r- r.x-'� ,r _ �.• � r °-d _ _rT" 44 �L - -
L �++ }
w}7•}..'�' ..,a: ^4 v K-.;' :'�f, _ °-�.. i '"'F7C'� i� I Y`;�.��' ,`+ � r3,u<I--
" - _.
. 'k t
#M1S rr
'�" -,.,,, ;- ��a.. -.`� h ;ALL. 5 -.-,: y1 e'z' ='��^ .I
;�
,•, :y..I N -„_ 4 { { 'f I , „ .n_�,o..,, ice• 'J ,.,may �5y� - .
, '�i ,. , , 4 4 , ,off .,Y . _ - I ,W t- .
% N '5 a 'yr y 'r ,
n.
� . `'
r F I
w'rry{-- p . f
1 I
Sour "ce USGS Topo Tile 023.sid �° � x%'.°,,;
i 8 :
� �www.ncdot:org � . ., x I a ' ,
a
Figure 2
Town of Boone ,r, Legend
�wl< Proposed Water System Improvements
@"D1C <SON USGS neap Project Area
community Inhostruoturs con5ultonl5 Feet
0 1,500 3,000 6,000 \ I
1 in = 3,000 feet

,�..,
F[- N METI, iPC, TornTom
19 TODD cl ccr.r.,
1
�q
e
b
�) 1
421
3
I,
Ache County
wata
,II u9a County
lam-
n
Apt
Project Area
Symbol Soil Name Acres Percent
AcE Ashe- Chestnut complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very rock 0.85 0.8%
BrF Brownwood fine sandv loam. 50 to 95 percent slopes, very rocky 1 0.14 0.1
RoA Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 3
SnB Saunook loam, 2 to 8 percent sl
SnC Saunook loam, 8 to 15 percent
SnD Saunook loam, 15 to 30 percen t
SwC Saunook - Nikwasi complex. 2 to
flooded 17.58 15.8%
0.69 0.6%
14.63 13.2%
5.28 4.8%
1.34 1.L "/o
0.71 0.6%
1.69 1.5%
15.64 14.1
Figure 3 Legend
Town of Boone Streams
lftwl< Proposed Water System Improvements
iVDICKSON Soils Map Roads
Feet
0 1,550 3,100 6,200 Project Area
1 in = 3,000 feet

USDA
F, F prnent
United States Department of Agriculture
Rural Development
State Office
(Exh. E. - SI 1794 -1)
SUBJECT: Town of Boone
Proposed Water System Improvements — Water Treatment Plant
Improvements, New Raw Water Supply and Transmission Main
Finding of No Significant Impact
TO: Project File
The attached Environmental Assessment (June 22, 2010 revison) has been
prepared and reviewed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy
Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6941 et seq.); the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (40 CFR Parts 1500 - 1508); and 7 CFR Part 1794,
Rural Utilities Service's Environmental Policies and Procedures. Upon review of
the environmental documentation included and referenced in the Environmental
Assessment, I find that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on
the human environment and for which an Environmental Impact Statement will
not be prepared.
)WLA�*�
Randall A. Gore
State Director
Rural Development
Date
4405 Bland Road, Suite 260 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] • TDD: (919) 873 -2003 • Web: http: / /www.rurdev.usda.gov /nc
Committed to the future of rural communities.
"USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender."
To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.,
Washington, DC 20250 -9410 or call (800) 795 -3272 (voice), or (202) 720 -6382 (TDD).

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SWG040000
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A LINEAR UTILITY LINE PROJECT AND
ASSOCIATED INCIDENTAL BUILT -UPON AREA
UNDER 15A NCAC 2H.1000, SESSION LAW 2006 -246, and SESSION LAW 2008 -211
In compliance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations promulgated and
adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
All owners or developers of projects where either a CAMA Major Permit or a Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan approval is required, and that involve the construction of utility lines such
as water, sewer, gas, telephone and electric, with incidental built -upon area as herein defined, are
hereby authorized to construct such utility lines and incidental built -upon areas in compliance
with the General Permit conditions and the provisions of 15A NCAC 2H .1000, S.L. 2006 -246,
and S.L. 2008 -211 (hereafter referred to as the " stormwater rules"), the approved stormwater
management plans and specifications, and other supporting data as attached and on file with and
approved by the Division of Water Quality and considered a part of this general permit.
The General Permit shall become effective on July 1, 2010.
Signed this 16th day of June , 2010.
Original signed by Matt Matthews for
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SWG040000
PERMITTED ACTIVITIES
Until this permit is modified or rescinded, permittees are authorized to construct such incidental
built -upon area directly associated with the installation of a water line, sewer line, gas line,
telephone conduit, electric line, or other linear utility project, subject to the following standards.
All stormwater runoff from these projects shall be in accordance with the attached schedules as
follows.
Section A — Final Limitation and Controls for Stormwater Discharges
Section B — Schedule of Compliance
Section C — General Conditions
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR GENERAL PERMITS
This permit covers only stormwater discharges. Any other discharge to surface waters of the
state is prohibited unless covered by another permit, authorization or approval.
This General Permit does not relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any
other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgement, or
decree.
GENERAL PERMIT COVERAGE
All persons desiring to be covered by this General Permit must register with the DWQ by the
filing of a Notice of Intent (NOI) and applicable fees. The NOI shall be submitted and a
certificate of coverage issued prior to the installation of utility lines and prior to the construction
of any incidental built -upon area.
Any owner or developer not wishing to be covered or limited by this General Permit may make
application for an individual Stormwater Management Permit in accordance with the stormwater
rules, stating the reasons supporting the request. Any application for an individual permit should
be made at least 90 days prior to the time the permit is needed.
This General Permit does not cover activities or discharges covered by an individual permit. Any
person conducting an activity covered by an individual permit but which could be covered by
this General Permit may request that the individual permit be rescinded and coverage under this
General Permit be provided.
The definition of any word or phrase in this General Permit shall be the same as given in Article
21, Chapter 143 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, as amended. Other words and phrases
used in the General Permit are defined in the stormwater rules.
SECTION A: FINAL LIMITATIONS AND CONTROLS
During the period beginning on the effective date of the general permit, the Permittee is
authorized to clear and grade a proposed site. Stormwater runoff from the site shall be in
accordance with the following conditions:
1. Only the installation of utility lines and the construction of incidental built -upon area
associated with the project, as shown on the approved plans, are permitted. The permittee
must submit a modification and receive approval prior to any changes of the proposed
project.
2. Incidental built -upon area, for purposes of this permit, shall be limited to manhole covers,
small single pump stations, gravel access roads that have minimized their built -upon area,
and concrete pads.

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SWG040000
3. Approved plans and specifications for projects covered by this permit are incorporated by
reference and are enforceable parts of the permit.
4. A vegetated buffer /setback is required to be maintained between all impervious surfaces
and surface waters. Minimum required buffer /setback widths shall be provided as per
Table 1.
Table 1:
Location
COC Issue Date
Minimum Width
20 coastal counties
June 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2008
30'
20 coastal counties
After October 1, 2008
50' (30' — redevelopment)
Phase 11 areas (non - coastal)
After July 1, 2006
30' (setback)
Non -Ph.Jl & non - coastal
After Sept. 1, 2003
30'
5. No new stormwater piping shall be allowed except that minimum amount necessary to
direct runoff beneath an impervious surface such as a road and that minimum amount
needed under driveways to provide access to lots, or that amount as shown on the
approved plans.
6. The only runoff conveyance systems allowed will be vegetated conveyances such as
swales with minimum side slopes of 3:1 (H:V) as defined in the stormwater rules and
approved by the Division.
7. The approved Site & Grading plan for the incidental built -upon area shall contain the
following items:
a. A clear vicinity map showing the direction and distance to the nearest town or
city, street name, street number and the nearest intersection of two major roads.
b. The receiving waters.
C. The site drawn to scale showing all proposed built -upon surfaces.
d. All existing and proposed contours and spot elevations.
e. A legend of all symbols used on the site plan.
f. A delineation of the property and/or easement lines with bearings and distances.
g. A delineation of jurisdictional 401 /404 wetlands and coastal wetlands, or a note
on the plans stating that none exist. (Note: only a person trained to identify
wetlands can make this determination.)
h. A delineation of the 575' ORW AEC area as applicable.
i. A delineation of the buffer /setback area.
j. A calculation of the proposed amount of built -upon area.
k. Dimensions for all proposed built -upon area.
SECTION B: SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
The permittee shall at all times provide adequate stabilization measures in conformance
with the approved Site & Grading Plan and Erosion Control Plan.
2. The permittee shall submit all information requested by the Director or his representative
within the time frame specified in the written information request.

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SWG040000
3. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for revised
plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, including, but not limited to,
the following items:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Any changes in the location of, layout of, regrading of, addition to, or deletion of
the approved amount of incidental built -upon area, regardless of size.
e. Further subdivision or sale of the project area, in whole or in part.
f. Alteration of the proposed drainage.
4. The Director may determine that revisions to the project will require a modification to
permit coverage.
5. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one or more
of the minimum requirements of the General Permit. Within the time frame specified in
the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the Director for
modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide copies of
revised plans and certification in writing to the Director that the changes have been made.
SECTION C: GENERAL CONDITIONS
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in the General Permit is
considered a violation of the stormwater rules, and is grounds for enforcement action in
accordance with North Carolina General Statutes 143- 215.6A to 143- 215.6C, or for
certificate of coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification in
accordance with NCGS 143 - 215.1.
2. The certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to and approval by the
Director. In the event of an ownership change, the Director may require a separate NOI
and certificate of coverage. The approval of this request will be considered on its merits,
and may or may not be approved. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all
permit conditions until such time as the Director approves the transfer.
3. The issuance of this general permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and
modifying the general permit, revoking and reissuing the general permit, or terminating
the general permit as allowed by the laws, rules, and regulations contained in NCGS 143-
215.1 and the stormwater rules.
4. The certificate of coverage is issued in accordance with this general permit and may be
modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The notification of planned
modifications or non - compliance does not stay any general permit condition.
5. Upon the presentation of proper credentials, and during normal business hours, the
permittee shall allow the Director, an authorized representative of the Director, or DENR
staff, to enter the property, inspect the project for compliance with the permit, and sample
or monitor for water quality.
6. The permittee shall notify the Division of any name, ownership or mailing address
changes within 30 days.
7. Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification
regarding the project shall be subject to a fine of up to $25,000 per day, per violation.
8. The General Permit, Notice of Intent, Certificate of Coverage, approved plans and
supporting documentation are considered public record and are open for inspection
during normal business hours.

xr
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E.
Governor Director
March 1, 2012
Mr. Greg Young
Town of Boone
567 West King Street
Boone, NC 28607
Subject: Stormwater Permit COC No. SWG040046
Boone USDA Raw Water Project
General Permit - Linear Utility Line Project
Watauga County
Dear Mr. Young:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
In accordance with your application to be covered under the State Stormwater General Permit Number SWG040000
for a Linear Utility Line project, received on February 6, 2012, we are forwarding herewith the subject Certificate of
Coverage Number SWG040046 for the construction of a linear utility line project with associated incidental built -
upon area. The General Permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143 - 215.1,
Title 15A NCAC 2H .1000, and S.L. 2006 -246, the stormwater management rules.
Please take notice that this Certificate of Coverage is not transferable except by action of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ). The DWQ may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage.
Please take notice that this project includes an access road to be used for utility access, future modification or use of
this road for access to adjacent development may require modification or revocation of this Certificate of Coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of
Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal, state, or local
agency, law, rule, or ordinance.
If you need a copy of the General Permit, or have any questions concerning this permit, or need additional
information on this matter, please contact Sue Homewood at 336 - 771 -4964 or sue.homewood(&nedenr.gov.
Sincerely,
—to,,
Wakild, P.E.
cc: DWQ SWG040046 File
Randy Brookshire, WK Dickson (via email)
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1- 8779239748
Internet: wmomate rqualihl.org
An Equal Opportunity r, Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
,vlii`l ralllf

State Stormwater Management Systems
COC# SWG040046
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GENERAL PERMIT NO. SWG040000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. SWG040046
LINEAR UTILITY LINE PROJECT AND
ASSOCIATED INCIDENTAL BUILT -UPON AREA
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143 - 215.1, as
amended, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and 15A NCAC 2H.1000 and
S.L. 2006 -246, the Stormwater Rules,
The Town of Boone
is hereby authorized to construct 73,181 square feet of built -upon area incidental to the
proposed utility line installation located at
Boone USDA Raw Water Project
Brownwood Rd
Deep Gap
Watauga County
and to discharge stormwater to receiving waters designated as UT to South Fork New
River and South Fork New River, class C, HQW waters in the New River Basin, in
accordance with the provisions of the General Permit for a Linear Utility Line,
No.SWG040000, and the approved stormwater management plans and specifications,
and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by the Division of
Water Quality and considered a part of this permit for the subject project.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective March 4, 2011.
Signed this the 1s` day of March, 2012.
for
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1 of 1

Kj'�'Ar
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
Mr. Ward Marotti
WK Dickson
720 Corporate Center Dr
Raleigh, NC 27607
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
September 27, 2011
Subject Property: Town of Boone New Intake Site and Associated Water Line Improvements, Watauga County
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0506(h))
Dear Mr. Marotti:
On July 19, 2011, at your request and in your attendance, Sue Homewood conducted an on -site determination to
review features located within the subject project limits for intermittent /perennial determinations with regards to
the above noted state regulations. Tasha McCormick and Amanda Jones with the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) was also present at the site visit. The features that were reviewed are identified on the attached maps.
The Division acknowledges the areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the USACE.
With regards to the stream determinations, the September 14, 2011 sealed survey maps provided by WK
Dickson were determined to be accurate reflections of the stream determinations made during our site visit and
are attached as reference. Tributary 1 was determined to be a perennial stream throughout the project
boundaries. Tributary 2 was determined to be perennial as it comes down a hillside, out of the wooded area,
into the pastured area where it degrades into an intermittent channel. All other streams throughout the project
boundaries were determined to be perennial streams.
Please note that at the time of this letter, all intermittent and perennial stream channels and jurisdictional
wetlands found on the property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. These regulations are subject to
change in the future.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any
future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the
date of this letter. In addition, the streams identified may be subject to the Jordan Lake Buffer Protection Rules
02B .0267.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston -Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston - Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: 336 - 771-46301 Customer Service: 1- 877 - 623 -6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarohna
Natumllrf

Ward Marotti
September 27, 2011
Page 2 of 2
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority
that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly, DWQ,
401 Oversight /Express Review Permitting Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604 -2260.
Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface
water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start until
the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ
recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made
in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C.
27699 -6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you have any
additional questions or require additional information please contact me at 336 - 771 -4964 or
[e-mail]
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
DWQ Winston -Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: WK Dickson Survey map
cc: Tasha McCormick, USACE Asheville Regulatory Office (via email)
DWQ, Winston -Salem Regional Office

Page intentionally left blank

ENT OF TyR
O� yT
� O
4fgR X869
H
United States Department of the Interior
Mr. Ward Marotti
Project Manager
WK Dickson
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Dear Mr. Marotti:
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
May 2, 2012
Subject: Proposed Water Treatment Plant Expansion, Boone, Watauga County, North Carolina
On May 1, 2012, we received a phone call and email from you requesting confirmation our
previous comments on the subject project. We previously commented on this project in letters to
you dated November 14, 2008, and December 16, 2009. We are providing the following
comments in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA);
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661- 667e); and section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 -1543) (Act).
In the aforementioned phone conversation you stated that there had been no changes to the
subject project (expand the treatment capacity of the water treatment plant from 3.0 million
gallons per day (mgd) to 4.5 mgd, construct a new raw water intake on the South Fork of the
New River, add 11.6 miles of new raw water transmission line, and construct two pump stations)
since we last commented. As such, we have no additional comments beyond those provided to
you in our letter of November 14, 2008. Similarly, because the project has not been modified,
we continue to believe the proposed water treatment plant expansion will not affect any federally
listed species or designated critical habitat. Therefore, the requirements under section 7(c) of the
Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if-
(1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or
critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in
a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is
determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Thank you for informing us about this project. If you have any questions about these comments,
please contact Mr. Allen Ratzlaff of our staff at 828/258 -3939, Ext. 229. In any future
correspondence pertaining to this matter, please reference our Log Number 4 -2 -09 -017.

cc:
Mr. David McHenry, Mountain Region Reviewer, North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission, 20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway, Waynesville, NC 28786

TFAKffANrf
7FAWARr2 AEADOw air 71
AE4DOWCAM2
NER AIID WA r
AEADOW CRC
7MMARrS flRffARr3
INWARY4
TI�UrAR!'6
AEADOW
OWN 4
INWARr7
METLAAD
Iff
LAKON
$ CORMWN
BOONE
TOWN UMITS
NETLAAD US Mrf 4V S
ROCKr t N
TO�YN a�
OF �HAM
CFM
sr,,r�1 ■ 7�ITAR!'g
BOONE
TOWN LIMITS
'THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY
OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITHIN THE
DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE.
OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT. BEEN
DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED
UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS
DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO
THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL"
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE
DATE
USACE ACTION ID
�(
720 RMEIGHNNC 27607 Dote : 11/21/11
D7 � 1� (910) 762 —owla Scale: AS SHOWN
DICKSAP®rN Office Locations North Carolina Drawn : JRM
community Infrastructure consultants South' Carolina Chk: GVC
No:
PREPARED FOR: TOWN OF BOONE
WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
I, GUY V. COOKE, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL
GPS SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT THIS GPS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO RURAL
CLASS B LIS /GIS SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS WITH ALL POINTS BEING ACCURATE TO WITHIN 5.61 FEET
A 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL AND THAT I USED MAPPING GRADE GPS FIELD PROCEDURES AND
COORDINATES WERE OBTAINED BY POST PROCESSING AGAINST THE NORTH CAROLINA GEODETIC
SURVEY BOONE — (ASUB) STATION. THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ON AUGUST 4, 2011 AND
AUGUST 5, 2011, USING A TRIMBLE PROXH AND TRIMBLE GEOXT RECEIVERS AND ALL CODRDINATES
ARE BASED ON THE NAD 983 STATE PLANE NORTH CAROLINA DATUM.
GUY V. COOKE NC PL # L -4596
AT
SURVEYORS NOTES:
1)THE PROPERTY LINES AND CREEKS SHOWN HEREIN DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD SURVEYS
CONDUCTED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND AS SUCH ARE SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES REPRESENTING
APPROXIMATE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES AS TAKEN FROM SURVEYS BY ROGER MORGAN, WK DICKSON &
CO, INC.; NC PLS L -3847, DATED OCTOBER 17, 2008, AND WATAUGA COUNTY AND ASHE COUNTY GIS
SYSTEMS.
2) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION CONTAINED IN THIS SECTION, IT IS THE DUTY OF THE
SURVEYOR, BY A CERTIFICATE ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT, TO CERTIFY:
c. ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
LTHAT THE SURVEY IS OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND AND DOES NOT CREATE A
NEW STREET OR CHANGE AND EXISTING STREETS;
2. THAT THE SURVEY IS OF AN EXISTING BUILDING OR OTHER STRUCTURE, OR NATURAL FEATURE,
SUCH AS A WATERCOURSE:
I, GUY V. COOKE, HEREBY STATE THAT THE.000RDINATES OF THE STREAM AND WETLAND POINTS
SHOWN HEREIN WERE CREATED USING MAPPING GRADE GPS RECEIVERS WITH AN ACCURACY OF +/ -1
METER AND ARE BASED UPON 'SHE NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83
DATUM. 1- ) 9 UPON)
HE
GU COOKE NC PLS j L -4596
SHEET
CONTENTS
"HAMPTON"
TRIBUTARY 1
2
TRIBUTARY 2
N 905739
E 1211366
WETLAND WA
3
WETLAND WA
4
WETLAND WA
MEADOW CREEK 1
MEADOW CREEK 2
MEADOW CREEK 3
5
MEADOW CREEK 4
LAXON CREEK
TRIBUTARY 6
TRIBUTARY 3
6
TRIBUTARY 4
TRIBUTARY 5
WETLAND WE
7
WETLAND WF
ROCK BRANCH
TRIBUTARY 7
8
HARDIN CREEK
TRIBUTARY 8
CORDINATE TABLES
9
WETLAND AREA TABLE
STREAM LENGTH TABLE
owCA�O'/ //
FSSSJ 1'ty'�
CL SEAL y9r:
' { L -4596 a;
V.
CONTROL POINT
NCGS MONUMENT
"HAMPTON"
NCGS NAD 83
COORDINATES
N 905736.03
E 1211369.28
FIELD
COORDINATES
N 905739
E 1211366
SHEET 1 OF 8
TITLE: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
OF WATERS OF THE US
ALONG PROJECT ALIGNMENT

/ \ \ "THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY
\ y / OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITHIN THE
\ / DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE.
OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN
DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
\ REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED
UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS
\ /J DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO
\ / / THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL."
REGULATORY OFFICIAL �
TITLE
o DATE
USACE ACTION ID
UPLANDS
433
434 432
STREAM CONNECTION TO RIVER LARRY COOPER UPLANDS
D.B. 1122, PG. 23B
PID 2942684470000
21
1 20
TRIBUTARY 1
18
4 ....., ::....::...::�••.• WETLAND WA
16
15
TROMRY 2
27
467
Up"S 465
430
n
F--
W
W
Ln
W
Z
J
2
U
F--
Q
239 "• 14
B ..
cv
I i l l lll�
p... 13
11 479476
',2
471
WEMMD WA 25
'A `,10
���\\D�� ARO�'
`�
480 481
472
`�
Q'
LARRY COOPER
/
477 24
E
D.B. 1122, PG. 230
PID 2942684470000
J� -A•�
UPLANDS
475 475 474 473
/w°
LARRY COOPER
S'UR��-O•.
"
PID 294268447 000
� /Y 1 coo,��\�`�
NCGS MONUMENT
O
N 9057738 03
►a
GRAPHIC SCALE
E 1211369.28
0
SCALE: 1" =100'
SHEET 2 OF 9
72° CORPORATE LEIQH. NC 27607
c9,9, 782 -0495
Dote :
11/21/11
PREPARED
FOR:
TOWN OF EOONE
TI LE:
JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION
Scale: AS SHOWN
DvW
DICKSON
OF WATERS
OF THE US
ARM
community infrastructure consultants
Office Locations: North Corollno
South Carollno
Drawn
:
WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
ALONG PROJECT ALIGNMENT
Chk: GVC
Prol. Na: 8032MA
UP I IMUCT Un F —n;'7a

MATCH LINE SHEET 4
Amw 314 352
ASEV309 LARRY COOPER
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY 307 361 /A 9 D.B. 334, PG. 2053
OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITHIN THE 306 'll9G PID 15163 -002
DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. 360 c9 cc�
OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN 315 359 Qi�, +
DEUNEATED. UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE -LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED 350 /
UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS
DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO 357 LARRY COOPER \
THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL' 356 D.B. 1122, PG. 23B
316 PID 2942684470000
REGULATORY OFFICIAL 355
354
TITLE 353 \
LARRY COOPER DATE WE UND WA 317 352 / \
D.B. 1122, PG. 23B
PID 2942684470000 USACE ACTION ID 351 UPLANDS
350 / \
318 349 /
348
Ur'1 AAmS 347
319 344 /
423 320 43
UPLANDS 424 422 x 3 323 322 321 341
440 421 324 �
425 25
40
420 �° 3
441 326 327 328 336 I.S. COOPER
439 442 337 / O.B. 1288, PG. 634
429 426 419 i1PLAAW 329 K5 / PID 2942871802000
N 428 427 LARRY COOPER f3 UPLVDS
Lj 436 44 PID 294288447 000 330 3 2
437
TIE LINE 331
= 436 418 N24'43 VE 409
22.90' 407 408
U} 444
w 417 410 406
Z 445 411
�I 461 450 416 413 412 395 6 39
= 463 462 446 414 450 451 445
•'
U 464 415 �'�" 10 WA
Q459 447 449 452
448 398
� 458 �/ �/� 394
457 WG I LAl VD WA 453 404 1 RAW
LARRY COOPER I.S, COOPER MAMW
D.B, 1122, PG. 238 D.B. 1288, PG. 634
PIO 2942684470000 393 PID 2942871802dOQ
LARRY COOPER X56 454 399
D.B. 1122, PG. 238
455
PIO 294268""000 440 403 %A C A I
392 UPLANDS 402 \ OQL� • 'R0l
i
391 390 401 = `� • �F �SS' ' •�y. i
389
�• J
�11F'.v1 386 96
f I.S. COOPER �7 ••,y O'
D.B. 1286, PG. 63a�,�zo• qtr �1 s I�`� -.
PID 2942871802000 �4 384 386 _1/C(/ �R • ' <(, ���
385 /1 /Y V. C0�\�\
NCGS
GRAPHIC SCALE HAMPTONUMENT onto �l,�111�1
100 N 90573B.03
SCALE: 1"=100' E 1211389.28
SHEET 3 OF 9
RALEIGH, NC 27607 Date 11/21/11 PREPARED FOR: TITLE: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
K (919) 782 -095 Scale: AS SHOW
TOWN OF BOONE
DWDICKSON Office Locations: North Carolina Drawn : JRIA OF WATERS OF THE US
community Infrastructure consultants south Carolina Chk: GVC WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
ur. im uw N�le_n3-aProl. NO: W32MA ALONG PROJECT ALIGNMENT

1 \�
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY
I 0 OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITHIN THE
\ DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE.
OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN
DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
133 / REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED
1 7- 1 \ UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS
/ DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO
\ THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL"
1 \ / REGULATORY 0FFICIAL
TITLE .
\ / DATE
j USACE ACTION ID
—j /
1
j
1 �
CR�NB£RRY SP
G�ApE R�Ncs RD
�vpp PVE 0yµ1 —'( STREAM CONNECTION 7 IVER
��PUGP ' 377 376 MEADOW CREEK f
I nE
— l 378 374 � ?��; `�IMi�l1I�
-- _� New RI 373
VER
FORK
TN 72 38=1 • 43 � \`` OQ; • •F ss�
l SOU ..,; ` �• �oF y•;�
'� A. fn 378 37 382 \ _
LeifC WA 371 \ 3B3 42 r
L
III I 6
3so 370 \ — • y
LARRY COOPER oPMS 369 \ ' Jg
l J D.B. 1122, PG. 238 3B1 i
PID 2942684470000 368 `N.:: 40 // �' .COD \
GRAPHIC SCALE
00
SCALE: 1"=100'
MATCH LINE SHEET 3
\ [ r
LARRY COOPER
D.B. 3 2053
15 \ _
PiD 15163 -3— 002
'z° R&MG11, NC 27607 Dote : 11/21/11 PREPARED FOR: TITLE:
csa,sa� 7W—M95 Se ASSHOwN TOWN OF BOONS JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
WD�KSON Office Locations: north Carolina Drawn : JRM I OF WATERS OF THE US
community infrastructure consultants South Carolina Chk: GVC WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
ue i i1 ridewfeunn c —na7a Prai. No. 8032300RA ALONG PROJECT -A LI G N M E N T

52
Cp
1p
55
54
NCGS MONUMENT
HAMPTON"
N 905738.03 GRAPHIC SCALE
E 1211389.28 0 25 50 _ X00
SCALE: 1"=100'
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY
OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITHIN THE
DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE.
OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN
DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED
UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS
DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO
THE 1987 CARPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL"
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE
fit
DATE 63 :x:' 73
2
USACE ACTION ID 64 "71
JERRY BROWN
D.B. 790, PG. 803 65 ,.70 �y
\ PID 2942843544000 8B
1 �
l fa
NCGS MONUMENT MEADOW CREEK 3
HAMPTON"
N 905736.03 _
E 1211369.28 GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1"=100'
37-
VIRGINIA M. SMITH
LIFE ESTATE` Z
D.B. 93, PG. 69 re
PID 2942631833000 o RONALD L. KELLY
g D.B. 73, PG. 412 JAMES C. WATSON \ `\���Q.�(H ,CARP( /����
1!7!Q[I"iARY 6 ,aa 99 PID 2942704591000 o s: LIVING TRUST . Q . ESS%
101 ' 106 109 D.B. 1485, PG. 885 �• • Q� + • =
102 ' '
11 121 PID 2951087008000
VNE 1041a 107 120 S
11 r 1 f
pF. q0• 105 MEADOW 112 119 f 163 y �-
Qt 165 184 182 LfiAO!■ CRET f. +•O ���+
VlIGICI� 113 1i 16667186,... B1 Ba %��0& 3�R, •,�4, `��
SID o ,67pQ .y 159 r y "C p0
1 1 fc VNi "E 15 114.1167 O \ 1 /� 17 155 C I f Illi1,� ISO
"�HAMPMONUMENT N A 'to A y2Z \ � �0 �� Vt1B 174 176 5 15� ( fi
E 2011369 28 / '/�` �gCP� $7gy2� 177
GRAPHIC SCALE 421
D 25 5 0 ' NCGS MONUMENT �/ GRAPHIC SCALE NCGS MONUMENT US HwY GRAPHIC SCALE
1 " 905736.03 O 25 50 100 N "HAMPTON"
03
SCALE: 1"=100' 0 25 s ,Oo
E 1211369.28 SCALE: 1" =100' E 1211369.28
SCALE: 1" =100'
SHEET 5 OF 9
720 CORPORATE CENTER
RAIEIGHN C 27607 Date 11/21/11
PREPARED FOR: TITLE: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION `S'9' o Scale: AS Si0N TOWN OF BVONE DWDEKSON Omae Locations: North Carolina Drow n
: ,lRM OF WATERS OF THE US
community Infrastructure consultants South Carolina Chk: GVG
Ceorgio WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
NC LICENSE N0. F ^0374 Pro). No: 80323DUIiA ALONG PROJECT ALIGNMENT
60 1 \
46 59
47
56
y9r9\ r
48
. 57
`:
49 MEADOW CREEK 2
\
f
\
5D 56
f
\
�
I.S. COOPER
51 +'' O.B. 1288, PG. 634
jIf
PID 2942871802000
+
52
Cp
1p
55
54
NCGS MONUMENT
HAMPTON"
N 905738.03 GRAPHIC SCALE
E 1211389.28 0 25 50 _ X00
SCALE: 1"=100'
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY
OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITHIN THE
DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE.
OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN
DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED
UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS
DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO
THE 1987 CARPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL"
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE
fit
DATE 63 :x:' 73
2
USACE ACTION ID 64 "71
JERRY BROWN
D.B. 790, PG. 803 65 ,.70 �y
\ PID 2942843544000 8B
1 �
l fa
NCGS MONUMENT MEADOW CREEK 3
HAMPTON"
N 905736.03 _
E 1211369.28 GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1"=100'
37-
VIRGINIA M. SMITH
LIFE ESTATE` Z
D.B. 93, PG. 69 re
PID 2942631833000 o RONALD L. KELLY
g D.B. 73, PG. 412 JAMES C. WATSON \ `\���Q.�(H ,CARP( /����
1!7!Q[I"iARY 6 ,aa 99 PID 2942704591000 o s: LIVING TRUST . Q . ESS%
101 ' 106 109 D.B. 1485, PG. 885 �• • Q� + • =
102 ' '
11 121 PID 2951087008000
VNE 1041a 107 120 S
11 r 1 f
pF. q0• 105 MEADOW 112 119 f 163 y �-
Qt 165 184 182 LfiAO!■ CRET f. +•O ���+
VlIGICI� 113 1i 16667186,... B1 Ba %��0& 3�R, •,�4, `��
SID o ,67pQ .y 159 r y "C p0
1 1 fc VNi "E 15 114.1167 O \ 1 /� 17 155 C I f Illi1,� ISO
"�HAMPMONUMENT N A 'to A y2Z \ � �0 �� Vt1B 174 176 5 15� ( fi
E 2011369 28 / '/�` �gCP� $7gy2� 177
GRAPHIC SCALE 421
D 25 5 0 ' NCGS MONUMENT �/ GRAPHIC SCALE NCGS MONUMENT US HwY GRAPHIC SCALE
1 " 905736.03 O 25 50 100 N "HAMPTON"
03
SCALE: 1"=100' 0 25 s ,Oo
E 1211369.28 SCALE: 1" =100' E 1211369.28
SCALE: 1" =100'
SHEET 5 OF 9
720 CORPORATE CENTER
RAIEIGHN C 27607 Date 11/21/11
PREPARED FOR: TITLE: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION `S'9' o Scale: AS Si0N TOWN OF BVONE DWDEKSON Omae Locations: North Carolina Drow n
: ,lRM OF WATERS OF THE US
community Infrastructure consultants South Carolina Chk: GVG
Ceorgio WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
NC LICENSE N0. F ^0374 Pro). No: 80323DUIiA ALONG PROJECT ALIGNMENT

1 i
}� BETTY ELLEN WATSON TR lARY3 77
p D.B. 1043, PG. 111 76 r
a PIO 2942769503000
�' �ar4 •� ° 79
74
6g
irk
/
TRIBUTARY 4
5 a
/ as Ij 1� /
� s
RD °
MACK BROWN
X90 \ (LIFE ESTATE)
0_B. 395, PG. 315
PIO 2942665677000
TRIBUTARY 5 /
\ 90 89 /
91
\ "THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY
/ \ g 4 93 9 98 ��� +� C A R r,�i OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITHIN THE
O L3 7 / `����'(H • • • •0�/ /�� DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE.
/ O . fcSS/ • �' �� OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN
/ � / `�2 • pF •;� DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED
UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS
DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO
THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL"
i�i �•� S�R`;�•�, \�� REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE
NCGS MONUMENT
/ "HAMPTON" / (/ DATP
N 905736.03 /
/ E 1211359.28
/ USACE ACTION ID
e GRAPHIC SCALE
25 5 0
/ SCALE: 1 " =100'
i
SHEET 6 OF s
WK
720 cDRPORRALEIGH, NC 27607 Date : 11/21/11 PREPARED FOR: TITLE: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
(919) 782 -0495 Scale: AS SHOWN TOWN OF BOONS
DICKSONOffice Locations: North Carolina Drawn : ARM OF WATERS OF THE US
community Infrastructure consultants South Coralino Chk: GVC WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
NC LICENSE NOiF -0374 raj. No! OD323DMA ALONG PROJECT ALIGNMENT

W
WILLIAM DOYLE CHURCH
D.B. 80, PG. 449 122 '9 6
PID. 2941989247000 123 4884` 88 488 1 / 524
I 1� L� 525
222
48
525
521 489 UPLANDS _
520 �° 529 528 S27
519 ~� 534
51 1 49D OLD ¢�, t1E 532 531 530 UPLANDS
�� S T 5Z= 533
/ 517 491 O NSCP� 57S4,3
UPLANDS 51433 512' ::
1525 126 �O S
511' O
NCGS MONUMENT
W �2
5117 ":. 492 'P HAMPTON'
J 47 TRlBUTARY7 N 9057,76.03 v GRAPHIC SCALE
128 1 E 1211369.28 00
508
129507 493 SCALE: 1"=100'
494
TOWN OF 548
BOONE 1x5
D.S. 1488, PG. 519
PID 2951073927000 5D5 495
496
ND WE
504 UPLANDS /
WETLA
503 4 497 fi
41
N X30 UPLANDS 498 \`0 \��kk C i; RO��j //
500 �Y �NCN 1��� •OF ES S�0 �y� =_
501 1 NCGS MO ENT 9. .
138 Li39 RAMP 185 'Q
N 90 6.03 185 184 183
NOS �0 JAMES C. WATSON E 1 1359.28 19 182 1B 180179 -4 �•
LIVING TRUST BLUE RIDGE ` 411SE 87 • y .{O;
D.B. 1485, PG. 68 ELECTRIC io i,E 31 % 1888 191 192 194 178 �j ••� SUIR �(G• \�
NCGS MONUMENT PID 295108700BOO�RAPHIC SCALE MEMBERSHIP 0Z 5�9g2 t93 196 // �i — . • (� ��
N
*HAMPTON"
3 5 0 CORPORATION 5C 195 �� //� 'V IIC,O0 �f\�
E 1211369.28 D.B. 74, PG. 501
SCALE: 1"=50' PID 2951074891000 O MILES TO
OLD 421 S
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER GRAPHIC SCALE
ACT WITHIN THE DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT o US HWY 421 S
ON THE STE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF
SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE SCALE: 1" =100'
UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DEUNEA71ON MANUAL"
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE
DATE
USACE ACTION ID SHEET 7 01179
DWK z °° RALEIGH "NGZso, Date : 11/21/11 PREPARED FOR: TOWN OF BOONE TITLE: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DICKSON (s: North Office Locations: Carolina Drown : JRM OF WATERS OF THE US
community infrastructure consultants South Carolina Chk: GVC WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
ur,irvue UnglU- M -MProt No:803YMA ALONG PROJECT ALIGNMENT

WATAUGA COUNTY
D.B. 20, PG. 70
PID 2910883456000
NOT TO
TIE LINE
SCALE
S84-23'15",
7785.04
NCGS MONUMENT
HAMPTON'
N 905736.03
E 1211369.28
HARDiIN CREEK
ee 203
G
4� O
y
D�
TOWN OF
\ BOONE
PID 2910968716000
197
198 N'2 08
1
200
201 1
208
205
GRAPHIC
SCALE: 1"=4100'
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY
OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITHIN THE
DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE.
OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN
DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED
UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS
DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTIUZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO
THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL"
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE
DATE
USACE ACTION ID
CAR p4�y���/
Q7 SE r.
cq o.
Al
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
PID 2910868824000 235
212 210
21 209
214
215 237
TMBfff ARY B 2116 z34
218 233
219 231 232
220 230
221 29
NOT TO 222 228
scAf E 223 TOWN OF
TIE LINE
N62'19'31•w 227 BOONE
6065 5` 224 ::,``' 228 D.B. 280, PG. 443
NCGS MONUMENT PID 2910748397000
'HAMPTON' 225
N
1211 905736.03 aT
E 12i1369.2 .zB
�le 4 Co
GRAPHIC SCALE
25 50
100
SCALE: 1"=50'
SHEET 8 OF 9
isu UucrUKAie Ucnicn umre
RA911j) Ncz7607D aft
al : AS PREPARED FOR: TOWN OF BOONE TITLE: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
W�KSON (919) 782 -0495 Scale: A5 SNOWN
o1��e L000ttona: North GarWlna Drawn : JRM OF WATERS OF THE US
community infrastructure eonaultanis South Carolina hk: GVC WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
P R 0 VE M E N TS
Georgia ALONG PROJECT ALIGNMENT
NC LICENSE No. F -0374 rod No: B032.i0DRA

12
13
30
31
928117
928105
928059
1245608
1245532
TABLE
TRIBUTARY 7 COORDINATE TABLE
POINT
NORTH
EAST
122
918105
1250330
123
918105
1250328
124
918092
1250333
125
918069
1250341
125
918056
1250363
127
918041
1250363
128
918033
1250366
129
918027
1250372
130
918028
1250382
131
918023
1250390
132
917991
12504`15
133
917974
1250435
134
917950
1250452
135
917925
1250459
136
917903
1250483
137
917895
1250493
138
917875
1250505
139
917874
125D507
140
917875
1250509
141
917899
1250494
142
917905
1250486
143
917953
1250454
144
917927
1250472
145
917976
1250436
146
917993
1250421
147
918024
1250393
148
918032
1254382
149
918030
1250374
150
918042
1250365
151
918059
1250386
152
918071
1250343
153
918095
1250334
TRIBUTARY 8 COORDINATE TABLE
POINT
NORTH
EAST
209
905006
1217455
210
905004
1217451
211
905000
1217453
212
905010
1217446
213
905010
1217441
214
905005
1217437
215
904994
1217443
216
904992
1217439
217
904985
1217433
218
904981
1217422
219
904974
1217416
220
904968
1217412
221
904954
1217409
222
9D4955
1217400
223
904945
1217396
224
904926
1217380
225
904921
1217384
228
904943
1217399
227
904951
1217402
228
904951
1217412
229
904964
1217413
230
904975
1217424
231
944983
1217435
232
904989
1217441
2333
904994
1217446
234
905005
1217440
235
905007
1217444
236
904995
1217453
237
905003
1217456
\\A CAR04
�2o�o�ESS
{
' CL SE —
r
/ii�yrV ,GOpII r\��\
NAME
ACRE5
WETLAND WA
1.04
WETLAND WE
0.22
WETLAND WF
0113
SHEET 9 OF 9
"° ``ter R LElcK. NC 27607 Date : 11/21/11 PREPARED FOR: TITLE:
DWK (919) 762 -D495 scale. AS SHOWN TOWN OF BOONE JURISDICTIONAL D E T E R M I N A TI O N
DICKSON Office Loaatlona: North Carolina Drawn : ARM OF WATERS OF THE US
community infrastructure consultants South Carolina Chk: Gvc WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
UP. tImmicr unit —n�7a Prot No: BD323DORA - ALONG PROJECT ALIGNMENT

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements (South
Fork New River)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga / Ashe City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2747390 N, Long. - 81.558917°
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review
area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Ve "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 25501inear feet: 100width (ft) and /or 5.85 acres.
Wetlands: 0 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW: South Fork New River.
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
® TNWs: 2550 linear feet 100 width (ft), Or, 5.85 acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Ll Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
■ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
E Wetlands
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant /consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
El U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NC189.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements (Ut
to South Fork New River)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga / Ashe City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2736170 U1, Long. - 81.559599° Iff
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RUA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review
area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Ve "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 550 linear feet: 3.Owidth (ft) and /or 0.04 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 550 linear feet3.0width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
E Wetlands
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NC189.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Meadow Creek)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2522010 1, Long. - 81.551058° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
S Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There M "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): '
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 30.0 linear feet: 6.Owidth (ft) and/or 0.00 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IH.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW':
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: 4
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM .7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ne lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 30 linear feet 6.Owidth (8).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters .9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
$See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'"Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NC 189.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Meadow Creek - 2)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2759210 1, Long. - 81.551131° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
S Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There M "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): '
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 75 linear feet: 15.Owidth (ft) and /or 0.03 acres.
Wetlands: 1.79 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IH.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW':
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: 4
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM .7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ne lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's now
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 75 linear feet 15.Owidth (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section II1.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands have direct hydrologic connection to the stream which flows directly into
TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section I1I.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 1.79 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters .9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ 1rom which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
$See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Ell Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
El Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
® Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non- wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant /consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NC 189.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Boone Water System Improvements City /County: Boone, Watauga Sampling Date: 11 -J� lye
Applicant/Owner: Town of Boone State: NC Sampling Point: Upland WA
investigator(s): W. Marotti Section, Township, Range:
Hilislo e ) Concave Slope ( %): 1 -2%
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): P Local relief (concave, convex, none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat: 36.274219 N Long: - 81.552339 W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RoA - Rosman fine sandy loam, TxA - Toxaway loam, NkA - Nikwasi loam NWI classification: NA
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Are Vegetation =,.Soil �, or Hydrology = naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No within a Wetland? Yes El No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two re uired
Prima Indicators minimum of one is re uired�
check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=True Aquatic Plants (914)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (136)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
ODrainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
=Moss Trim Lines (1316)
=Water Marks (131)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (CB)
=Drift Deposits (133)
❑Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (84)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (B5)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water - Stained leaves (99)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ZL
No ❑ Depth (inches):
❑ Nog
Saturation Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland WA
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
(A)
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2.
Total Number of Dominant
(B)
3.
Species Across All Strata:
4.
- -
Percent of Dominant Species
(A!B)
5,
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
ce Index worksheet:
7.
o Multiply bV: -
/o Cover of:
8.
ies x 1 =
FFACW
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
=Total Cover
)
ecies x 2 =
1
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B!A =
6.
_
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7,
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
9.
_
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0
10.
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) -
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
O Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Paur Vegetation Strata:
5.
_ _
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
height (DBH), regardless of
6,
more in diameter at breast
7
height.
B.
Sapling /Shrub -- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
11.
_
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
= Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes No
6
Present?
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

Sampling Point: upland
VVV
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type Lac Texture
10YR3/3
-- ^� - k d S d G s 'Location: P
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Q Histosol (Al)
0 Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
RDepleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Q Sandy Redox (S5)
Q Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
=Reduced Matrx, MS -Mas a an rain .
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Q Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Q Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Q Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Q Depleted Matrix (F3)
Q Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Q Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Q Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Q Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
hydrology must be present,
Q Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _a No 71
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Boone Water System Improvements Boone, Watauga Sampling Date: 11-July-2011
Project/Site: Y CitylCounty: Wetland WA
Applicant/Owner:
Town of Boone State: NC Sampling Point:.
Investigator(s): W. Marotti Section, Township, Range:
Hillslo a Concave Slope ( %): 1-2%
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): p Local relief (concave, convex, none): NAD $3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR tat: 36.274477 N Long: -81.551473 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: RoA - Rosman fine sandy loam, TxA - Toxaway loam, NkA - Nikwasi loam NWI classification: NA
Are climatic 1 hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _L4=L No (If no, explain in Remarks.) ❑ _EJ
Are Vegetation 1 r , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑ No
Are Vegetation n, Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No within a Wetland? Yes . No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Seconds indicators minimum of two re uired
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=True Aquatic Plants (814)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Drainage Patterns (810)
=Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (Bi)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
= Sediment Deposits (62)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Drift Deposits (133)
=Algal Mat or Crust (64)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (85)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water - Stained Leaves (139)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (613)
=FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes g
No Depth (inches): Wetland
Hydrology Present?
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Wetland WA
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �- {A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
_ Percent of Dominant Species
5. - That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG {�H)
6.
_ _ Prevalence Index worksheet:
7. Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8 =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
2=
SaolinglShrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size
FACW species x
FAC species x 3 = ��
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (H)
Prevalence Index = H /A=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
02 - Dominance Test is X50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Gaalium aparine
FACU
2.
Clematis virginiana
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
Polygonum sagittatum
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4
Impatiens capensis
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Scirpus pungens
FACW
Tree u Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (
6.
Carex lurida
OBL
more in diameter at breast height (aBH), regardless of
7.
Mentha piperita
FACW
height.
8.
Carex gynandra
FACW
SaplinglShrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g
Lysimachia terrestris
OBL
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft 0 m) tall.
10.
Eupatorium maculatu m
FACW
Herb- All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11 I.
Sagittaria latifolia
DBL
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
=Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: }
1. -
2.
3. -
4. -
5.
6. -
= Total Cover
Remarks: llnnitide nhoto numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓ No
Present? Yes
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

Sampling Point:
Wetland WA
uProfile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks
finches) Color (moist) % Color moist % Tvoe Lo c Texture
1 QYR4 /1 75 5YR4/4 25
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, F
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Q Histosol (Al)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
Q Black Histic (A3)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A44)
Q Stratified Layers (A5)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
F-1 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
HSandy Gleyed Matrix (S44)
Sandy Redox (S5)
[:]Sid pped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed): "
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
m„u, �„ , ,Q,,, , Sand Grains. 'Location: P
Q Dark Surface (S7)
Q Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Q Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Q Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Q Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
0 Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils%
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 1447)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
0 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes z NO ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Tributary 6 - Meadow Creek)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2622830 ff Long. - 81.555383°
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
0 Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 30 linear feet: 6.Owidth (ft) and/or 0.00 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 30 linear feet 6.Owidth (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
E Wetlands
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NCI 89.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Tributary 5 - Meadow Creek)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2665540 9, Long. - 81.553625° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
0 Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 30 linear feet: S.Owidth (ft) and/or 0.00 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 30 linear feet S.Owidth (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
E Wetlands
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NCI 89.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Tributary 4- Meadow Creek)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2676120 J, Long. -81.551541' W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
0 Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 30 linear feet: 1.0width (ft) and/or 0.00 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 0.01 square miles
Drainage area: 1.33 square miles
Average annual rainfall: 51.5 inches
Average annual snowfall: - -- inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: Tributary flows into Meadow Creek which flow directly into South Fork New River.
Tributary stream order, if known: 1.
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 1.0 feet
Average depth: 1.0 feet
Average side slopes: E.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Stable.
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Intermittent but not seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: Flows northwest to southeast before entering Meadow Creek.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: No. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
®
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
® shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
®
sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
®
multiple observed or predicted flow events
® water staining
®
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water appearance was clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): 10 -15 feet.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 30 linear feet 1.0width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
E Wetlands
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NCI 89.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Tributary 3 - Meadow Creek )
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2680530 1, Long. - 81.550391° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
S Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There M "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): '
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 30 linear feet: 3.Owidth (ft) and/or 0.00 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IH.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW':
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: 4
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM .7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ne lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 30 linear feet 3.Owidth (8).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters .9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
$See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'"Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NC 189.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Tributary 2 - Meadow Creek)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.273174'N., Long. - 81.557462° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
0 Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 50 linear feet: 3.Owidth (ft) and/or 0.00 acres.
Wetlands: 0.10 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 30 linear feet 3.Owidth (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW` that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands have direct hydrologic connection to the stream which flows directly into
TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.10 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
El Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
El Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NCI 89.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Boone Water System Improvements City /County: Boone, Watauga Sampling Date: 11 -J� lye
Applicant/Owner: Town of Boone State: NC Sampling Point: Upland WA
investigator(s): W. Marotti Section, Township, Range:
Hilislo e ) Concave Slope ( %): 1 -2%
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): P Local relief (concave, convex, none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat: 36.274219 N Long: - 81.552339 W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RoA - Rosman fine sandy loam, TxA - Toxaway loam, NkA - Nikwasi loam NWI classification: NA
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Are Vegetation =,.Soil �, or Hydrology = naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No within a Wetland? Yes El No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two re uired
Prima Indicators minimum of one is re uired�
check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=True Aquatic Plants (914)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (136)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
ODrainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
=Moss Trim Lines (1316)
=Water Marks (131)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (CB)
=Drift Deposits (133)
❑Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (84)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (B5)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water - Stained leaves (99)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ZL
No ❑ Depth (inches):
❑ Nog
Saturation Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland WA
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
(A)
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2.
Total Number of Dominant
(B)
3.
Species Across All Strata:
4.
- -
Percent of Dominant Species
(A!B)
5,
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
ce Index worksheet:
7.
o Multiply bV: -
/o Cover of:
8.
ies x 1 =
FFACW
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
=Total Cover
)
ecies x 2 =
1
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B!A =
6.
_
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7,
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
9.
_
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0
10.
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) -
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
O Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Paur Vegetation Strata:
5.
_ _
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
height (DBH), regardless of
6,
more in diameter at breast
7
height.
B.
Sapling /Shrub -- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
11.
_
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
= Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes No
6
Present?
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

Sampling Point: upland
VVV
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type Lac Texture
10YR3/3
-- ^� - k d S d G s 'Location: P
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Q Histosol (Al)
0 Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
RDepleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Q Sandy Redox (S5)
Q Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
=Reduced Matrx, MS -Mas a an rain .
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Q Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Q Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Q Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Q Depleted Matrix (F3)
Q Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Q Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Q Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Q Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
hydrology must be present,
Q Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _a No 71
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Boone Water System Improvements Boone, Watauga Sampling Date: 11-July-2011
Project/Site: Y CitylCounty: Wetland WA
Applicant/Owner:
Town of Boone State: NC Sampling Point:.
Investigator(s): W. Marotti Section, Township, Range:
Hillslo a Concave Slope ( %): 1-2%
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): p Local relief (concave, convex, none): NAD $3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR tat: 36.274477 N Long: -81.551473 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: RoA - Rosman fine sandy loam, TxA - Toxaway loam, NkA - Nikwasi loam NWI classification: NA
Are climatic 1 hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _L4=L No (If no, explain in Remarks.) ❑ _EJ
Are Vegetation 1 r , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑ No
Are Vegetation n, Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No within a Wetland? Yes . No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Seconds indicators minimum of two re uired
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=True Aquatic Plants (814)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Drainage Patterns (810)
=Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (Bi)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
= Sediment Deposits (62)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Drift Deposits (133)
=Algal Mat or Crust (64)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (85)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water - Stained Leaves (139)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (613)
=FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes g
No Depth (inches): Wetland
Hydrology Present?
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Wetland WA
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �- {A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
_ Percent of Dominant Species
5. - That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG {�H)
6.
_ _ Prevalence Index worksheet:
7. Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8 =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
2=
SaolinglShrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size
FACW species x
FAC species x 3 = ��
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (H)
Prevalence Index = H /A=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
02 - Dominance Test is X50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Gaalium aparine
FACU
2.
Clematis virginiana
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
Polygonum sagittatum
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4
Impatiens capensis
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Scirpus pungens
FACW
Tree u Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (
6.
Carex lurida
OBL
more in diameter at breast height (aBH), regardless of
7.
Mentha piperita
FACW
height.
8.
Carex gynandra
FACW
SaplinglShrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g
Lysimachia terrestris
OBL
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft 0 m) tall.
10.
Eupatorium maculatu m
FACW
Herb- All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11 I.
Sagittaria latifolia
DBL
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
=Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: }
1. -
2.
3. -
4. -
5.
6. -
= Total Cover
Remarks: llnnitide nhoto numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓ No
Present? Yes
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

Sampling Point:
Wetland WA
uProfile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks
finches) Color (moist) % Color moist % Tvoe Lo c Texture
1 QYR4 /1 75 5YR4/4 25
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, F
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Q Histosol (Al)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
Q Black Histic (A3)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A44)
Q Stratified Layers (A5)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
F-1 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
HSandy Gleyed Matrix (S44)
Sandy Redox (S5)
[:]Sid pped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed): "
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
m„u, �„ , ,Q,,, , Sand Grains. 'Location: P
Q Dark Surface (S7)
Q Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Q Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Q Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Q Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
0 Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils%
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 1447)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
0 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes z NO ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Tributary 7 - Gap Creek)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.245970 1fLong. - 81.54229° WE
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
0 Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 115 linear feet: 5.Owidth (ft) and /or 0.01 acres.
Wetlands: 0.13 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 115 linear feet S.Owidth (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
■ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW` that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands have direct hydrologic connection to the stream which flows directly into
TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.13 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
El Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
El Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NCI 89.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
11 -July -2011
Project/Site: Boone Water System Improvements City/County: Boone, Watauga Sampling Date: --
planl WE
AppGcantl0wner: Town of Boone State: NC
Sampling Point: U
Investigator(s): W • Marottl Section, Township, Range: °
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIIISIope Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Concave Slope ( %): 1 -2 �°
Datum: NAD 83
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat. Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: NA
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes M No (if no, explain in Remarks.) ❑
Are Vegetation , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation n, Soil El, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Lis he Sapled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No hin Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes F 1 No ❑✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Seconds Indicators minim7Surface
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Prima Indicators minimum of one is re uired• check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6
=Sparsely Vegetated ConHigh
❑Surface Water (Al)
=True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Water Table (A2)
= Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
DDrainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C 3)
=Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
= Presence. of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry- Season Water Table
=Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Cra ish Burrows (C8)
Yf
❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
= Other (Explain in RemarlKs)
OStunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
OMicrotopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
Water Table Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Yes ❑
No Depth (incises): Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
Saturation Present?
Ja
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
US Army Corps of Engineers

VEGETATION (Four Strata) —Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland WE
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
(A)
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2.
Total Number of Dominant
(B)
3.
Species Across All Strata:
4.
Percent of Dominant Species (�B)
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7•
_ _
o Mu1tIp1V bV: —
Total /o Cover of:
8.
_ _
OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
= Total Cover
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
FAC species x 3 =
2
FACU spedes x 4 =
3
-
UP species x 5 =
4
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B!A = ��
6.
_
tiydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
F-1 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
F-13 - Prevalence Index is 53.0
10.
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
height (DBH), regardless of
6
more in diameter at breast
7
height.
8•
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11.
_ _
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall
12.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
=Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2,
3.
4.
5.
_ _
Hydrophytic
Vegetation n
Yes
6.
Present?
= Total Cover
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

Sampling Point: 11Ple
IaWIL-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type _ Loc Texture
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand drams. Loc:auuIL Fes- u•� °°
indicators for Problematic Hydric So ils3:
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Q Dark Surface (S7)
Q 2 cm Muck (Al ) (MLRA 147)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
Q Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Q Black Histic (A3)
Q Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Q Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Q Stratified Layers (A5)
Q Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Red Parent Material (TF2)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
= Redox Dark Surface (F6)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Q Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q Redox Depressions (F8)
=Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Q Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
QSandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
= Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndiicators of hyd rophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
=Sandy Redox {S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils F19 MLRA 148
� mon ( ) ( )
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
LHydriSlilPre5ent? Z
Depth (inches):
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
11 -July -2011
Project/Site: Boone Water System Improvements City/County: Boone, Watauga Sampling Date:.
WE
Applicant/Owner:
Town Of Boone State: NC Sampling Point: wetland
Investigator(s): W• Marotti
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Hillslope
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat: 36.245987 N Long: - 81.542310 W
Soil Map Unit Name: SwC - Saunook - Nikwasi complex, 2 -15 percent slopes NWI classification: NA
�/ L­
( %): 1 -2%
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic 1 hydrolo lc conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (lf no, explain in Remar s.) ❑
Are Vegetation r , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ia No
Are Vegetation �, Soil or Hydrology= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes No ❑ Is the Sampled Area ❑
Yes No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes No
Yes 0 No-
HYDROLOGY
Secondary Indicators minimum of two re uired
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Prima indicators minimum of one is re wired
check all that a I
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
= Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
=High Water Table (A2)
= Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Drainage Patterns (B10)
=Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (92)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
QSaturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (135)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
= Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (97)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water- Stained Leaves (139)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (1313)
=FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches): Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version
U5 Army Corps of Engineers
Wetland WE
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of
plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute
Dominant i7ndi
ance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover
Species?
r of Dominant Species A
( )
e OBL, FACW, or FAC: _�-
1
2.
umber of Dominant
3.
s Across All Strata:
4 .
t of Dominant Species
(�B)
5.
re OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
lence Index worksheet:
7•
Total % Cover of Multi I b
8
OBL species x 1
= Total Cover
FACW species x 2 = -
��
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
x 3 =
1.
-
FAC species -
FACU species x 4
2.
UPL species x 5 = -
3.
Column Totals: (A) _ (B)
4
5.
Prevalence Index = B1A = �-
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
] 2 - Dominance Testis >50%
9.
0 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Fl Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Gaalium aparine
FACU
2. Clematis virginiana
FAC
, indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3 Polygonum sagittatum
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
q Impatiens capensis
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5. Scirpus pungens
Carex lurida
FACW
OBL
Tree -- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
height (DBH), regardless of
6.
more in diameter at breast
7. Mentha piperita
FACW
height.
g. Carex gynandra
FACW
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g. Lysimachia terrestris
OBL
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (i m) tall.
10. Eupatorium maculatum
FACW
- woody) p re 9
Herb - All herbaceous (non.-woody) regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.26 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
=Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
FlHydropphytic
3.
4.
5.
Vegetation V No
Present? Yes
6.
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version
U5 Army Corps of Engineers

Sampling Point: Wetland WE
vProfile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
Lnches) Color (moist) _ % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
10YR411 80 5YR416 20
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, F
Hydric Soil Indicators:
OHistosol (Al)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
0 Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
QThick Dark Surface (Al2)
F-1 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
=Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
educed Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. -Location:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls':
0 Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
0 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
0 Thin Dark Surface (Sg) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
0 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Q Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
0 Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Q Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Z No 11
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Laxon Creek)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2356660 U1, Long. - 81.562494°
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
0 Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 80 linear feet: 4.Owidth (ft) and/or 0.01 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 80 linear feet 4.Owidth (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
E Wetlands
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NCI 89.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Wetland WF )
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2266930 N, Long. - 81.606738° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.17 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 0.03square miles
Drainage area: 0.46 Pick List
Average annual rainfall: 51.5 inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 1 -2 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1 -2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: Wetland WF is the headwwaters to Brown Branch which flows directly into South Fork
New River.
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

Tributary stream order, if known: 1.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 4.0 feet
Average depth: 1.0 feet
Average side slopes: E.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition /stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Stable.
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Meandering
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: Brown Branch flows west - northwest before entering the South Fork New River.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
®
the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
® shelving
®
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
®
sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
®
scour
❑ sediment deposition
®
multiple observed or predicted flow events
® water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings /characteristics ❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): 15.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:0.17acres
Wetland type. Explain: Roadside ditch depression.
Wetland quality. Explain:fair.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: No.
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Ephemeral flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Confined
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
® Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: Wetland is seperated by DOT roadway. Brown Branch is just downstream of
road crossing.
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 1 -2 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 -2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: Wetland is within the DOT HWY 421 ROW. Surface water is minimal..
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD: Wetland WF is the headwaters to Brown Branch. This wetland is seperated by a road intersection, however still is
hydrologically connected by a culvert..
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
S1 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
In Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.17acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
El Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
El Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NCI 89.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
11 -July -2011
Projectsite: Boone Water System Improvements City /County: Boone, Watauga sampling Date:
ApplicarntlOwner:
Town Of Boone State: NC Sampling Point: Upland WF
Investigator(s): W Marotti Section, Township, Range:
Iiillslo a Concave Slope ( %): 1-2%
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): p Local relief (concave, convex, none): Nf1D 83
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat: 36.226595 N tang: -81.606805 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: SnC. - Saunook loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NW; classification: NA
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) ❑
Are Vegetation � ,Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation II, Soil or Hydrology Ll naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Second IH Indicators (minimum of two re
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Prima Indicators minimum of one is re uired
Surface Water (A1)
check all that a I
=True Aquatic Plants (1314)
juire
OSparsely Vegetated Concave Surfac
=High Water Table (A2)
= Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Drainage Patterns (B10)
=Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (B1)
= Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (62)
= Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
QCrayfish Burrows (C8)
QSaturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Drift Deposits (133)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
OStunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (135)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
= Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water - Stained Leaves (139)
OMicrotopographic Relief (D4)
QAquatic Fauna (613)
OFAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes.
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Yes ❑ No
Saturation Present? Yes E
No ❑ Depth (inches): Wetland
Hydrology Present?
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version
US Army Corps of Engineers

VEGETATION (Four Strata) —Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland nd WF
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
(A)
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2.
Total Number of Dominant
(B)
3.
Species Across All Strata:
4.
Percent of Dominant Species (AB)
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: __�
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply b
8.
OBL species x 1 = ��
Sap-ling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
=Total Cover
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2.
-
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = BIA= f�
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
7.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
9.
❑ 3 Prevalence Index is 53.0
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3,
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
_ _
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
height (DBH), regardless of
6,
more in diameter at breast
7
height.
B.
Sapling[Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb —All herbaceous (non- woody) p lants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
=Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4•
5.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes No
6.
Present?
= Total Cover
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WIF
Sampling Point: UPIen
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth . Matrix Redox Features Remarks
t)
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (mois % Type --co-T-1 Texture
1 OYR4 /6
'T e: C= Concentration, D =De letion, F
Hydric Soil Indicators:
= Histosol (Al)
[� Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
=Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,14B)
=Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
=Sandy Redox (S5)
= Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
educed Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Linin I M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
= Dark Surface (S7)
[] 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
[] Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
= Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Q Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
= Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
= Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
[] Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
= Redox Dark Surface (F6)
= Red Parent Material (TF2)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
[] Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
= Redox Depressions (F8)
= Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
= Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators
nand
hydrology hytic be vegetation
= Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes LI No 11
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
US Army Corps of Engineers

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project[Site: Boone Water System Improvements City/County: Boone, Watauga Sampling Date:
11 -July -2011
Wetland WF
AQQlicanUOwner:
Town of Boone State: NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): W. Marotti Section, Township, Range: 1 -2 /
Landform (hillsiope, terrace, etc. ): Hillslo a Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %):
Np,p 83
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat: 36.226682 N Long: -81.606722 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: SnC - Saunook loam, S to 15 percent slopes, SnD - Saunook loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes NWI classification: NA
Are climatic] hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes M No (If no, explain in Remarks.) ❑
Are Vegetation RE I _Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes
❑✓ No
Are Vegetation n, Soil la, or Hydrology –F—L naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetiand Hydrology I
Yes ✓❑ No ❑
Yes No
Yes No ❑
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that a
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
=Surface Water (Al)
=True Aquatic Plants (1314)
=High Water Table (A2)
= Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
=Water Marks (131)
= Presence of Reduced iron (04)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
=Water-Stained Leaves (69)
=Aquatic Fauna (613)
Surface Water Present? Yes =L No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes = No ❑ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches):
(includes caoillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo:
Remarks:
Yes a No ❑
;e Soil Cracks (136)
Sly Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
ige Patterns (B10)
Trim Lines (6'113)
eason Water Table (C2)
sh Burrows (CS)
ation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
ad or Stressed Plants (D1)
zorphic Position (D2)
ow Aquitard (D3)
,topographic Relief (D4)
Neutral Test (D5)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Z No a
, previous inspections),
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Wetland WF
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of
plants.
sampling Point:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
DominanceTestworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plat size: ) %Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species (A)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
1
2.
Total Number of Dominant
B
3
Species Across All Strata:
4.
Percent of Dominant Species (A/B)
5.
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: �-
6.
Prevalence index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
OBL species x 1 = �-
=Total Cover
FACW species x 2
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
x 3 =
1. Salix nigra
OBL
FAG species _�
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
5•
Prevalence Index = BIA = ,
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation lndicators:
7.
F-1 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Typha domingensis Pers.
OBL
2. Juncus effuses
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
_
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
more in diameter at
7
height.
8.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
-
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
g,
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 in
=Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum {Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
-
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
6.
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

enii
Sampling PaiWetland WF nt:
f Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Re arks
10YR5/1 85 5YR3/4 15
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion,
Hydric Soil indicators:
= Histosol (Al)
= Histic Epipedon (A2)
= Black Histic (A3)
®Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
= 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
=Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147, 148)
=Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
= Sandy Redox (S5)
=Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
0 Dark Surface (S7)
0 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
0 Thin Dark Surface (89) (MLRA 147, 148)
= Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
= Depleted Matrix (F3)
= Redox Dark Surface (F6)
= Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
= Redox Depressions (F8)
= Iron- Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
0 Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
= 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
= Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
= Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Q Red Parent Material (TF2)
= Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
= Other (Explain in Remarks)
3indicators of hyd rophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Z No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Hardin Creek)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2117490 N, Long. - 81.647234° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
0 Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 105.0 linear feet: 14.Owidth (ft) and/or 0.03 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 105.0 linear feet14.0width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
■ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
E Wetlands
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NCI 89.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements (South
Fork New River)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga / Ashe City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2084140 N, Long. - 81.653455°
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review
area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Ve "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 70.0 linear feet: 35.0 width (ft) and/or 0.06 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW: South Fork New River.
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
® TNWs: 70 linear feet 35 width (ft), Or, 0.06 acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Ll Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
■ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S., or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
® Wetlands
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
El U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NC189.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Town of Boone, Proposed Water System Improvements
(Tributary 8 - South FOrmk New River)
State:NC County /parish/borough: Watauga City: Brownwood
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2077010 ®, Long. - 81.652818° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork New River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Fork New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): New River 05050001020030
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 7 -19 -2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
0 Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 90.0 linear feet: S.Owidth (fl) and/or 0.01 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: �I
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: A NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 was completed to reach this conclusion.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 90.0 linear feet 5.0 width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
■ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
E Wetlands
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:USGS TopoTile023 1:24000 Source:www.ncdot.org.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Watauga County GIS data NCI 89.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2005 Watauga/Ashe County Source:www.nconemap.com .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR
1) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE
ONSITE T.B.M. w/ EXISTING ELEVATIONS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT
W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC. © 828.327.6911 IF
ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN
ELEVATIONS SHOWN.
2) PLEASE NOTE THAT N.C. LAW REQUIRES THAT
THE NC ONE CALL CENTER BE NOTIFIED PRIOR
TO PERFORMING ANY CONSTRUCTION, DIGGING,
OR EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)
THAT MAY EXIST AND CROSS THROUGH THE
AREA(S) OF CONSTRUCTION, WHETHER
INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR NOT. CALL
"811" OR 1- 800 - 632 -4949 OR VISIT
WWW.N000C.ORG A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS
PRIOR TO DIGGING OR EXCAVATING. REPAIRS
TO ANY UTILITY DAMAGED RESULTING FROM
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
3) UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON WERE MARKED BY ON
TARGET UTILITY LOCATE SERVICES, INC. DURING
SEPTEMBER, 2008 AND THOSE MARKS WERE FIELD
LOCATED BY W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC. DURING
OCTOBER, 2008. THE ACCURACY OF FIELD MARKED
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IS +/— 30 INCHES
HORIZONTALLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. THE
DEPTH OF THESE UTILITIES IS UNKNOWN, UNLESS
OTHERWISE INDICATED. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
WERE LOCATED USING GPS, AND THEODOLITE AND
ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER USING THE NC GRID
(NAD 83) DATUM HAVING AN ACCURACY OF +/— 24
INCHES.
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON MAPPED BY
OTHER MEANS ARE CLEARLY INDICATED TO BE FIELD
VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR, AND ARE SHOWN AT
APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS ONLY. OTHER MAPPING
METHODS INCLUDE MAP DIGITIZATION AND GIS DATA.
THE RESULTANT ACCURACY OF THE UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES MAPPED FROM EITHER DIGITIZED MAPS OR
GIS DATA CAN NOT BE VERIFIED. THE DEPTH OF
THESE UTILITIES IS UNKNOWN AND SHOULD BE FIELD
VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
Know what's below.
Call before you dig
L I kfe A
A 1 � � 1 1 1 ,
A all N Di
THE TOWN OF BOON
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
VICINITY MAP- WATAUGA COUNTY
NOT TO SCALE
TOWN OF BOONE
MAYOR - ANDY BALL
MAYOR PRO-TEM - RENNIE BRANTZ
TOWN MANAGER - JOHN WARD III
TOWN COUNCIL
QUINT DAVI 1
FRED C
LYNNE MASON
JENNIFER PENA
9� .....•P��,i�.
f °j °aaW
FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING
SBACK
PE
CE
PDE
O
0
67M_ - - - --
O
------ ss - - - - --
------ re - - - - --
----- -ow - --- --
---- .-- UE - - - - --
------PO------
------ 4'D - - - - --
------T------
Wv
f)
E
R1
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
RIGHT —OF —WAY
— —
SETBACK
— — — — — --
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PE
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
CE
PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PDE
INDEX CONTOUR
100
INTERVAL CONTOUR
96
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE
ROOF DRAIN
RD
HYDROLOGIC FEATURE
— — — —
FENCE
X X
GUARDRAIL
T T T
RAILROAD LINE
—'r
��—i-
SIGN
—i-
CURB AND GUTTER
CONCRETE WALK /PAD
HEAVY —DUTY ASPHALT
LIGHT —DUTY ASPHALT
FORCE MAIN
FM
GRAVITY SEWER
SS
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
•
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
BOTTOM OF BANK
BB
TOP OF BANK
TB
DITCH LINE
OVERHEAD WIRE
OW
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
UE
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
FO
UNDERGROUND GAS
G
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UT
POWER POLE
f
LIGHT POLE
X
GUY WIRE
SHRUB LINE
...... ^^^�^^
TREE LINE
j_e1r1y_ry"v_y1y1ey1%.
WATER LINE
W
GATE VALVE
N
WATER METER
■
FIRE HYDRANT
PERMANENT DIVERSION DITCH
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DIVERSION DITCH
—10 TDD-10
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
—t®—
TREE
SHRUB
0
SOIL BORE
SPOT ELEVATION
ELEV x
BENCHMARK ELEVATION
CHECK DAM
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
RIP —RAP
TEMPORARY SEEDING
TS
PERMANENT SEEDING
PS
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
TELEVISION PEDESTAL
FIBER OPTIC PEDESTAL
MAILBOX
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LOD
WDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
WKD PROJECT NO. 80376.00.HI

N Q
�2
W(7
03�
O 4V
tzY
ZNF
xW 0W
F Y
¢
o�=
0
0
wZO
ffi JN
5w¢W
z-
DOC6WV
�3.=
W IY
W ?�
aF c
210
ism W
o wm
QNV
�Jw
ti a
?000
N
0
�o190
a1FmW
0H
WOa¢
sz rc
LuN
DRAWING INDEX
GENERAL
NUMBER
TITLE
GOA
COVER SHEET
GO.2
INDEX OF SHEETS
GO.3
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
GOA
MISC. DETAILS
GO.5
DETAILS
GO.6
DETAILS
GO.7
DETAILS
G0.8
DETAILS
EO.1
SCHEDULES AND SYMBOLS
EO.2
ELECTRICAL DETAILS
6
INDEX UPDATED TO REFLECT ADDITION OF SHEETS FPA TO FP.4
3/5/15
5
INDEX UPDATED TO REFLECT ADDITION OF SHEETS C4.34. AND C4.34A
11/4/14
4
INDEX UPDATED TO REFLECT ADDITION OF SHEETS C4.33A AND C4.33B
9/16/14
3
INDEX UPDATED TO REFLECT ADDITION OF SHEETS C4.34 TO C4.42
3/18/14
2
INDEX UPDATED TO REFLECT THE. ADDITION OF SHEET B3.5
10 -29 -12
1
INDEX UPDATED TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF SHEET 01.8 -
8/17/12
REV. N0.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
VIS 0 S
RE I N
DRAWING INDEX
DIVISION 1 -WATER TREATMENT
PLANT UPGRADES
NUMBER
TITLE
G1.0
GENERAL NOTES
G1.1
EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO. PLAN
G1.2
SITE PLAN
G1.3
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
G1.4
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
G1.5
UTILITY PLAN
G1.6
DETAILS
G1.7
DETAILS
G1.8
DETAILS
EN1.1
WTP PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC
EN1.2
WTP HYDRAULIC PROFILE
EN1.3
CHEMICAL UNIT DEMO PLAN
EN1.4
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE GENERATION AND CHEMICAL STORAGE PLAN
EN1.5
CHEMICAL STORAGE LAYOUT PLAN
EN1.6
ON -SITE GENERATION PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM
EN1.7
ON -SITE GENERATION DETAILS
EN1.8
BRINE GENERATOR DETAILS
EN1.9
CAUSTIC SODA RECIRCULATION & TRANSFER PUMP DETAILS
EN1.10
ON -SITE GENERATION FEED SYSTEM LAYOUT
EN1.11
FILTER & BASEMENT PIPING PLAN
EN1.12
FILTER & BASEMENT PIPING SECTIONS
EN1.13
FILTER PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM
EN1.14
FILTER CONSOLE
EN1.15
FLOCCULATION- SEDIMENTATION UNIT PLAN
EN1.16
FLOCCULATION - SEDIMENTATION UNIT SECTIONS
EN1.17
FLOCCULATION AND RAPID MIX DETAILS
EN1.18
HIGH SERVICE AND BACKWASH PUMPING STATION PLAN
EN1.19
HIGH SERVICE AND BACKWASH PUMP STATION SECTIONS
EN1.20
EXISTING CLEARWELL BAFFLE PLAN
EN1.21
EXISTING CLEARWELL BAFFLE SECTIONS
EN1.22
PROPOSED CLEARWELL DETAILS
EN1.23
PROPOSED CLEARWELL DETAILS
EN1.24
PROPOSED CLEARWELL DETAILS
EN1.25
PROPOSED CLEARWELL BAFFLE PLAN AND SECTION
EN1.26
BLOWER BUILDING EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
B1.1
CHEMICAL STORAGE APPENDIX B
B1.2
CHEMICAL STORAGE ADDITION PLAN
B1.3
CHEMICAL STORAGE ADDITION SECTIONS
B1.4
CHEMICAL STORAGE ADDITION ELEVATIONS
B1.5
BLOWER BUILDING APPENDIX B
B1.6
BLOWER BUILDING PLAN & SECTIONS
S1.01
BLOWER BUILDING & CHEMICAL STORAGE GENERAL NOTES
S1.02
BLOWER BUILDING & CHEMICAL STORAGE GEN. NOTES & ABBREV.
S1.03
BLOWER BUILDING & CHEMICAL STORAGE SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
S1.11
BLOWER BUILDING FOUNDATION PLAN
S1.12
BLOWER BUILDING FRAMING PLAN
S1.21
CHEMICAL STORAGE ADDITION FOUNDATION PLAN
S1.22
HIGH SERVICE AND BACKWASH PUMPING STATION PLAN
S1.31
DETAILS
S1.32
DETAILS
S1.33
BLOWER BUILDING DETAILS
S1.41
DETAILS
E1.1
HIGH SERVICE PUMPS ELECTRICAL PLAN
E1.2
GENERATOR FUEL DETAILS
E1.3
BLOWERS AND CHEMICAL STORAGE ADDITION ELECTRICAL PLAN
E1.4
POWER RISER
E1.5
PANELBOARD SCHEDULES
M11
MECHANICAL PLAN
M1.2
MECHANICAL PLAN
M1.3
MECHANICAL PLAN
FPA
FIRE PROTECTION SITE PLAN
FP.2
FIRE PROTECTION PLAN
FP.3
FIRE PROTECTION DETAILS
FPA
FIRE PROTECTION NOTES
DRAWING INDEX
DIVISION 2 - ACCESS ROAD AND
RAW WATER INTAKE
NUMBER
TITLE
G2.0
GENERAL NOTES
G2.1
OVERALL PLAN
G2.2
ACCESS ROAD LAYOUT PLAN STA. 0 + -00 TO 9 +00
G2.3
ACCESS ROAD LAYOUT PLAN STA. 9 +00 TO 22 +00
G2.4
ACCESS ROAD LAYOUT PLAN STA. 22 +00 TO 30 +90
G2.5
ACCESS ROAD GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN STA. 0 + -00 TO 9 +00
G2.6
ACCESS ROAD GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN STA. 9 +00 TO 22 +00
G2.7
ACCESS ROAD GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN STA. 22 +00 TO 30 +90
G2.8
ACCESS ROAD EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1 STA. 0 +00 TO 9 +00
G2.9
ACCESS ROAD EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1 STA. 9 +00 TO 22 +00
G2.10
ACCESS ROAD EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE I STA. 22 +00 TO 30 +90
G2.11
ACCESS ROAD EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE II STA. 0 +00 TO 9 +00
G2.12
ACCESS ROAD EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE II STA. 9 +00 TO 22 +00
G2.13
ACCESS ROAD EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE II STA. 22 +00 TO 30 +90
G2.14
DETAILS
G2.15
DETAILS
G2.16
DETAILS
G2.17
DETAILS
EN2.1
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION GROUND FLOOR EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
EN2.2
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION UPPER FLOOR EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
EN2.3
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION BUILDING SECTIONS A & B
EN2.4
RAW WATER INTAKE INFILTRATION GALLERY PLAN AND PROFILE
EN2.5
RAW WATER INTAKE INFILTRATION GALLERY PLAN & SECTIONS
EN2.6
GABION BASKET DETAIL AND SEEDING
EN2.7
INFILL AND PS LAYOUT
B2.1
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION APPENDIX B
B2.2
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION WET WELL PLAN
B2.3
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION GROUND FLOOR PLAN
B2.4
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION UPPER FLOOR PLAN
B2.5
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION BUILDING SECTIONS C & D
B2.6
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION BUILDING SECTION E
B2.7
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION NORTH & EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
B2.8
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION SOUTH & WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
B2.9
RAW WATER INTAKE STATION METAL BUILDING DETAILS
S2.01
GENERAL NOTES
S2.02
GENERAL NOTES & ABBREVIATIONS
S2.03
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
S2.11
FOUNDATION PLAN
S2.21
UPPER FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
S2.22
HOIST BEAM FRAMING PLAN
S2.31
DETAILS
S2.32
DETAILS
S2.33
DETAILS
S2.34
DETAILS
S2.41
DETAILS
S2.42
DETAILS
E2A
LIGHTING PLANS
E2.2
POWER PLAN
E2.3
PANELBOARD SCHEDULES & RISER
M2.1
UPPER LEVEL MECHANICAL PLAN
M2.2
GROUND LEVEL MECHANICAL PLAN
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
TITLE
401 4th STREET SW,
SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
RWH
DRAWN BY
-
PROJECT DATE
'/
��^
HICKORY,
(828)
NC 28602
327 -6911
APPROVALS
CADD MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.H1
FILE NAME
60376 -BOONE- COVER.DWG
• /`�
J ' V
W DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
NC LICENSE N0.
Office Locations:
North Carolina
South Carolina
F -0374
Georgia
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
DATE
• e�c P�
9 .NGINS
W. NPCo+ jJt 1
DRAWING INDEX
DIVISION 3 - BOOSTER PUMP
STATION
NUMBER
TITLE
G3.0
GENERAL NOTES
G3.1
EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO. PLAN
G3.2
SITE PLAN
G3.3
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
G3.4
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
G3.5
UTILITY PLAN
G3.6
DETAILS
G3.7
DETAILS
G3.8
DETAILS
G3.9
DETAILS
G3.10
DETAILS
EN3.1
BOOSTER PUMP STATION EQUIPMENT LAYOUT AND LEGEND
EN3.2
BOOSTER PUMP STATION INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
B3.1
BOOSTER PUMP STATION APPENDIX B
B3.2
BOOSTER PUMP STATION FLOOR PLAN
B3.3
BOOSTER PUMP STATION FLOOR DRAINS SYSTEM PLAN
B3.4
BOOSTER PUMP STATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
B3.5
BOOSTER PUMP STATION BUILDING SECTION & DETAILS
S3.01
GENERAL NOTES
S3.02
GENERAL NOTES & ABBREVIATIONS
S3.03
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
S3.11
FOUNDATION PLAN
S3.21
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
S3.31
FOUNDATION DETAILS AND SECTIONS
S3.32
TYPICAL MASONRY DETAILS
S3.33
TYPICAL MASONRY DETAILS
S3.41
FRAMING DETAILS AND SECTIONS
S3.42
FRAMING DETAILS AND SECTIONS
E3.1
LIGHTING PLAN
E3.2
POWER PLAN
E3.3
PANELBOARD SCHEDULES & RISER
M3.1
MECHANICAL PLAN
M3.2
MECHANICAL DETAILS, NOTES, & SCHEDULES
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING INDEX
DIVISION 4 - RAW WATER LINE
NUMBER
TITLE
G4.0
GENERAL
G4.1
STREAM RESTORATION DETAILS
C4.1
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 0 +00 TO STA. 28 +50
C4.2
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 28 +50 TO STA. 61 +50
C4.3
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 61 +50 TO STA. 77 +75
C44
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 77 +75 TO STA. 110 +25
C4.5
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 110 +25 TO STA. 126 +50
C4.6
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA, 126 +50 TO STA. 159 +25
C4.7
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 159 +25 TO STA. 191 +50
C4.8
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 191 +50 TO STA. 223 +75
C4.9
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 223 +75 TO STA. 256 +00
C4.10
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 256 +00 TO STA. 288 +50
C4.11
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA, 288 +50 TO STA. 321 +50
C4.12
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 321 +50 TO STA. 354 +25
C4.13
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 354 +25 TO STA. 386 +75
C4.14
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 386 +75 TO STA. 419 +25
C4.15
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 419 +25 TO STA. 451 +50
C4A6
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 451 +50 TO STA. 484 +50
C4.17
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 484 +50 TO STA, 516 +50
C4.18
24 -INCH RAW WATERLINE STA, 516 +50 TO STA. 549 +00
C4.19
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 549 +00 TO STA. 581 +50
C4.20
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 581 +50 TO STA: 614 +00
C4.21
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE STA. 614 +00 TO STA. 618 +04
C4.22
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE RIVER CROSSING PROFILES
C4.23
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE DETAILS
C424
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE DETAILS
C4.25
DUAL BODY COMBINATION AIR VALVE DETAIL
C4.26
WATER MAIN BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLY DETAILS
C4.27
24 -INCH RAW WATER LINE DETAILS
C4.28
STANDARD TEMPORARY SHORING DETAIL
C4.29
TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS
C4.30
TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS
C4.31
TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS
C4.32
TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS
C4.33
TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS
C4.33A
TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS
C4.33B
TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS & NOTES
C4.34
PROFILE - STA. 118 +00 TO STA. 143 +00
C4.34A
PROFILE - STA. 143 +00 TO STA. 175 +50
C4.35
PROFILE - STA. 175 +50 TO STA. 207 +75
C4.36
PROFILE - STA. 207 +75 TO STA. 240 +00
C4.37
PROFILE - STA. 240 +00 TO STA. 272 +50
C4.38
PROFILE - STA. 272 +50 TO STA. 305 +25
C439
PROFILE - STA. 305 +25 TO STA. 338 +00
C4.40
PROFILE - STA. 338 +00 TO STA. 370 +50
C4.41
PROFILE - STA. 370 +50 TO STA. 403 +00
C4.42
PROFILE - STA. 403 +00 TO STA. 435 +50
PAGE LEGEND
F_ PAGE NUMBER
EN1.13
DISCIPLINE IDENTIFICATION——-] 1 DIVISION NUMBER
SECTION /DETAIL LEGEND
DETAIL CALL -OUT / DETAIL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
AND DETAIL TITLE
IDENTIFICATION 2 3 SHEET NUMBER (IN SAME DISCIPLINE)
SYMBOL WHERE DETAIL IS DRAWN.
SHEET NUMBER ON WHICH DETAIL
CONDITION `OCCURS. (DASH INDICATES
CONDITION OCCURS ON MULTIPLE
SHEETS.)
SECTION CUT SYMBOL A SECTION IDENTIFICATION LETTER
(w /ARROW) OR TITLE -A(
IDENTIFICATION SYMBOL 2 -3 SHEET NUMBER (IN SAME STRUCTURE)
(w /o ARROW) I WHERE SECTION IS DRAWN.
SHEET NUMBER (IN SAME STRUCTURE)
ON WHICH SECTION IS INITIALLY CUT.
INDEX OF SHEETS
7 GO
YG0.8

�J
VW
2 N
O�
V�
veµun tetpg1A
CAgC
1/v 4b
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
1)
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
z
LO
r�
r/
Z
�
ccY
0
L.L
a
W
0
4
W
J
W
H
4
Z
Z
C3
to
Uj
D
J
z
LL
G0.3
YG0.8
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
ORAWNG SCALE
NTS
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
���
//\ /� NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
RV D'( KCOA'
��r J , v Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
DRAWN BY
CADD
PROJECT DATE
JULY 2012
BIDDING
- - --
APPROVED BY
BLT
PROJECT NUMBER
80376.00.HI
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
FILE NAME
80376 -BOONE_COVER.DWG
RECORD DWG.
----
veµun tetpg1A
CAgC
1/v 4b
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
1)
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
z
LO
r�
r/
Z
�
ccY
0
L.L
a
W
0
4
W
J
W
H
4
Z
Z
C3
to
Uj
D
J
z
LL
G0.3
YG0.8

F3z
60 LBS /ACRE OF: LBS /ACRE
GENERAL GRADING NOTES:
oy_O
MIXTURE
SHALLOW SEDGE 6
z�a
VIRGINIA WILD RYE 15
REFER TO DIVISION 31 SPECIFICATIONS
wz
HN
SEEDING
DEER TONGUE 9
it Y
REVISED TEMPORARY FIBER CHECK DAM TO INCLUDE PAM - PER NCDOT
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE NOTES:
WH
REVISED: SEEDING SCHEDULE
8/16/12
o-
DESCRIPTION
DATE
0vz
SEEDING
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF THE EROSION CONTROL
now
INDICATED BY SOIL TESTS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT
DEVICES UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED.
O *V
THAN 4 :1
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
oho°
CONTROL LINER
2. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION
�¢
INSPECT THE SILT FENCE OUTFALL AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH -
FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE PER WEEK.
O�°
VARYING DITCH
3. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
MIN. 12"
woo
°Joo
4. SEDIMENT IS TO BE BE REMOVED FROM AROUND THE FIBER CHECK DAMS AND INLET PROTECTION
, 5 �
- 130.5 NTS Vi
DEVICES WHEN STORAGE CAPACITY HAS BEEN APPROXIMATELY 50% FILLED.
3
V
w?p
S. FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE CLEANED AND /OR REPLACED WHEN THE SEDIMENT POOLS UPSTREAM OF
�'zY<
THEM NO LONGER DRAIN PROPERLY.
5MW
FIBER CHECK DAM
F'B2'M
DOWNSTREAM
6. SEDIMENT IS TO BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND SILT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES APPROXIMATELY 0.50' DEEP
<10
A
AT THE FENCE. THE SILT FENCE IS TO BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A BARRIER.
xJW
PAM
zo0o
2. BEFORE INSTALLATION OF FIBER ROLL, SMOOTH AND SHAPE Uj
7. GROUND COVER MUST BE ESTABLISHED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT AREA PER THE SEEDING SCHEDULE
N
WOODEN
ON THIS SHEET.
ON d z
V 0122
STAPLE FABRIC INTO
SPACED 1'
'dW aw
THE CHECK DAM AND EROSION FROM HIGH FLOWS AROUND THE EDGES
8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE FERTILIZED, SEEDED AND MULCHED AS NEEDED IN ACCORDANCE
ay'omm
THE FIBER ROLL.
WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL 6 SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.
xmaa
PROVIDE
2 STAKES ANGLED AS
o °`!''s
APPROXIMATELY 1 INCH UPSTREAM OF THE EDGE OF THE
9. ADDITIONAL MEASURES WILL BE REQUIRED IF VEGETATIVE COVER CANNOT BE ESTABLISHED AS
xo sa
3pzy
SHOWN.
PROPOSED.
LINER IN THAT PORTION OF THE CHANNEL. REMOVE SEDIMENT
ROLLS FOR EACH ROADSIDE DITCH.
V aco,a
EROSION CONTROL SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION NOTES
=ZQ ,
9 � <n
ACCUMULATED BEHIND THE DAMS AS NEEDED TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO
BACKFILL AND COMPACT
�
t .BEFORE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION, INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THE PLANS
000w ALONG WITH ANY REQUESTED BY THE NCDENR INSPECTOR RESULTING FROM THE PRECONSTRUCTION
MEETING, CLEARING AREAS ONLY AS NEEDED TO INSTALL THE DEVICES.
2. MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE ARE PROVIDED IN
EACH INDIVIDUAL DETAIL
3. RESEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS AS GRADING IS COMPLETED ALONG ALL CONSTRUCTION. ALL
DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE VEGETATED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED, AS SHOWN ON THE GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE, AFTER BEING DISTURBED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE SEEDING AND MULCHING
SCHEDULES ON THE DRAWINGS AS FOLLOWS:
A. ALL LOCATIONS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION WILL BE RESTORED ACCORDING TO THE PERMANENT
SEEDING SCHEDULE AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.
B. IF WORK IS LOCATED WITHIN AN EXISTING DITCH LINE, AND THE CHANNEL VELOCITY EXCEEDS 2
FT. /SEC., TEMPORARY CHANNEL LINERS (JUTE NET, STRAW WITH NET, FIBERGLASS ROVING,
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, ETC.) SHALL BE USED AS SHOWN ON DETAIL 1 /GO.6 AND AS DIRECTED BY
THE ENGINEER. THESE DITCH LINES WILL BE RESTORED ACCORDING TO THE PERMANENT SEEDING
SCHEDULE AS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE.
5. AFTER COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF DISTURBED AREAS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT A
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NCDENR LAND QUALITY SECTION FOR AN INSPECTION AND APPROVAL PRIOR
TO REMOVAL OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES FROM THE SITE.
6. THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES PRESENTED IN THESE PLANS SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTED BY THE
CONTRACTOR WITH ADDITIONAL MEASURES IF SEDIMENT IS LEAVING THE SITE OR FIELD CONDITIONS
CHANGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MODIFY THE EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES IF WARRANTED.
RIPARIAN SEED MIX
60 LBS /ACRE OF: LBS /ACRE
SEEDING
GREATER BLADDER SEDGE 6
MIXTURE
SHALLOW SEDGE 6
NONE
VIRGINIA WILD RYE 15
PROJECT DATE
SEPT. 2014
SWITCHGRASS 12
SEEDING
DEER TONGUE 9
2
REVISED TEMPORARY FIBER CHECK DAM TO INCLUDE PAM - PER NCDOT
8/20/14
i
REVISED: SEEDING SCHEDULE
8/16/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
RIPARIAN SEED MIX
PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE
SEEDING
60 LBS /ACRE OF: LBS /ACRE
SEEDING
GREATER BLADDER SEDGE 6
MIXTURE
SHALLOW SEDGE 6
NONE
VIRGINIA WILD RYE 15
PROJECT DATE
SEPT. 2014
SWITCHGRASS 12
SEEDING
DEER TONGUE 9
DATES
SOFT RUSH 6
7 DAYS
BIG BLUESTEM 6
SEEDING
ALL YEAR
DATES
INDICATED BY SOIL TESTS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT
14 DAYS
4000 LBS /ACRE OF LIME AND 1000 LBS /ACRE OF
SEEDING
FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED UNLESS OTHERWISE
AMENDMENTS
INDICATED BY SOIL TESTS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT
14 DAYS
SOILS TEST RESULTS TO LAND QUALITY INSPECTOR
THAN 4 :1
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE
SEEDING
60 LBS /ACRE OF: LBS /ACRE
MIXTURE
STABILIZATION TIME FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND
SHEEP FESCUE 50
NONE
BROOMSEDGE BLUESTEM 5
PROJECT DATE
SEPT. 2014
LITTLE BLUE STEM 5
SEEDING
8/1 THROUGH 6/1
DATES
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
4000 LBS /ACRE OF LIME AND 1000 LBS /ACRE OF
SEEDING
FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED UNLESS OTHERWISE
AMENDMENTS
INDICATED BY SOIL TESTS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT
14 DAYS
SOILS TEST RESULTS TO LAND QUALITY INSPECTOR
PURPOSES.
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
1. GROUND COVER - WHEREVER LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS UNDERTAKEN ON A
TRACT COMPRISING MORE THAN ONE (1) ACRE, A GROUND COVER SUFFICIENT
TO RESTRAIN EROSION MUST BE PLANTED OR PROVIDED PER THE GROUND
COVER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.
2. GRADED SLOPES AND FILLS - PER THE GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SHOWN
HERE, OR AT THE COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING, WHICHEVER PERIOD
IS SHORTER, SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED WITH
GROUND COVER, DEVICES, OR STRUCTURES SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION.
3. THE TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULES SHOWN BELOW SHALL BE USED DURING
CONSTRUCTION AND INITIAL SITE STABILIZATION. ONCE SITE GRADING AND
STABIUZA71ON IS COMPLETE, PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURES SHALL BE APPLIED
AS SHOWN ABOVE.
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION TIME FRAME
STABILIZATION TIME FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES
PROJECT DATE
SEPT. 2014
BIDDING
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HOW) ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE NOT
1 SECTION VIEW STONE
RECORD DWG.
STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50 FEET IN
PURPOSES.
LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER
14 DAYS
NONE (EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HOW ZONES)
THAN 4 :1
_
THESE AREAS AS WELL AS LOCAL LOW LYING SPOTS. z
TEMPORARY SEEDING -_ LATE_ WINTER /EARLY SPRING
SEEDING MIXTURE
SPECIES RATE (LB /ACRE)
RYE (GRAIN) 120
ANNUAL LESPEDEZA (KOBE IN PIEDMONT 50
AND COASTAL PLAIN, KOREAN IN MOUNTAINS)
OMIT ANNUAL LESPEDEZA WHEN DURATION OF TEMPORARY COVER IS NOT
TO EXTEND BEYOND JUNE.
SEEDING DATES
MOUNTAINS - ABOVE 2500 FT: FEB. 15 -MAY 15
BELOW 2500 FT: FEB. 1 -MAY 1
PIEDMONT - JAN. 1 -MAY 1
COASTAL PLAIN - DEC.1 -APR. 15
SOIL AMENDMENTS
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000 LB /ACRE GROUND
AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 750 LB /ACRE 10 -10 -10 FERTILIZER.
MULCH
APPLY 4,000 LB /ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT,
NETTING OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY
STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL
MAINTENANCE
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE AND
MULCH IM- MEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE.
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE - FALL
�tI•r�alT:,La
SPECIES RATE (LB /ACRE)
RYE (GRAIN) 120
SEEDING DATES
MOUNTAINS -,AUG. 15 - DEC. 15
COASTAL PLAIN AND PIEDMONT -AUG. 15 - DEC. 30
SOIL AMENDMENTS
FOLLOW SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000 LB /ACRE GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE
AND 1,000 LB /ACRE 10 -10 -10 FERTILIZER.
MULCH
APPLY 4,000 LB /ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, NETTING,
OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE
USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL
MAINTENANCE
REPAIR AND REFERTILIZE DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY. TOPDRESS WITH 50
LB /ACRE OF NITROGEN IN MARCH. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO EXTEND TEMPORARY
COVER BEYOND JUNE 15, OVERSEED WITH 50 LB /ACRE KOBE (PIEDMONT AND
COASTAL PLAIN) OR KOREAN (MOUNTAINS) LESPEDEZA IN LATE FEBRUARY OR
EARLY MARCH.
6 1 SEEDING SCHEDULE
rn NTS
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE - SUMMER
SPECIES RATE (LB /ACRE)
GERMAN MILLET 40
IN THE PIEDMONT AND MOUNTAINS, A SMALL- STEMMED SUDANGRASS
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT A RATE OF 50 LB /ACRE.
SEEDING DATES
MOUNTAINS - MAY 15 -AUG. 15
PIEDMONT - MAY 1 -AUG. 15
COASTAL PLAIN - APR. 15 -AUG. 15
SOIL AMENDMENTS
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000
LB /ACRE GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 750 LB /ACRE
10 -10 -10 FERTILIZER.
MULCH
APPLY 4,000 LB /ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH
ASPHALT, NETTING OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A DISK WITH
BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS AN ANCHORING
TOOL.
MAINTENANCE
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, FERTILIZE
AND MULCH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE.
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
DRAWING SCALE
AS SHOWN
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
W DICKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
STONE
DRAWN BY
RAB
PROJECT DATE
SEPT. 2014
BIDDING
2
APPROVED BY
JPK
PROJECT NUMBER
80376.00.HI
CONSTRUCTION
FILE NAME
80376AR -DETAILS.DWG
1 SECTION VIEW STONE
RECORD DWG.
TIE EROSION
*L = THE DISTANCE SUCH THAT POINTS
A AND B ARE OF EQUAL ELEVATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT
LOCATIONS WHERE TRUCKS
WILL BE ENTERING EXISTING
ROADWAY.
COARSE AGGREGATE -
STONE SIZE = 2 " -3"
6" THICK
MINIMUM
4-GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INSTALLED
MAINTENANCE: UNDER CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
MAINTAIN THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IN A CONDITION TO PREVENT MUD OR SEDIMENT
FROM LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOPDRESSING WITH
2 -INCH STONE. AFTER EACH RAINFALL, INSPECT ANY STRUCTURE USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT
AND CLEAN IT OUT AS NECESSARY. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS
SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS.
)TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
:n F NTS
Y�I i9./_1
1 "fill
#57 STONE
r
Mims p
No ` }
Y �
12"
SECTION A -A
I RIP -RAP
FLOW
INSPECT ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT
(1/2 INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL EVENT AND REPAIR IMMEDIATELY. REMOVE SEDIMENT AND
RESTORE THE SEDIMENT STORAGE AREA TO ITS ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS WHEN THE SEDIMENT
HAS ACCUMULATED TO ONE -HALF THE DESIGN DEPTH OF THE TRAP. PLACE THE SEDIMENT
THAT IS REMOVED IN THE DESIGNATED DISPOSAL AREA AND REPLACE THE CONTAMINATED
PART OF THE GRAVEL FACING. CHECK THE STRUCTURE FOR DAMAGE. ANY RIPRAP
DISPLACED FROM THE STONE HORSESHOE MUST BE REPLACED IMMEDIATELY. AFTER ALL THE
SEDIMENT - PRODUCING AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED, REMOVE THE STRUCTURE AND ALL
THE UNSTABLE SEDIMENT. SMOOTH THE AREA TO BLEND WITH THE ADJOINING AREAS AND
PROVIDE PERMANENT GROUND COVER.
3 \ ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION
rn F NTS
FIBER CHECK DAM
ROLL (12" DIA.)�
A
* SILT FENCE
SILT F
SEE DE
2,
FIBER CHECK DAM, AND PREVENT LARGE FLOWS FROM CARRYING
SEDIMENT OVER THE DAM. FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE CLEANED OUT
WHEN 50% OF STORAGE CAPACITY HAS BEEN FILLED IN WITH SEDIMENT.
REAPPLY PAM AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT THAT IS EQUAL TO OR
EXCEEDS 0.5 INCH.
6" (MIN.) SECTION
EMBEDMENT
PAM
(1 OZ.) 6" (MIN.)
EMBEDMENT
TEMPORARY FIBER CHECK DAM
NTS
GYYYYYYY, ,
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
GRADE
V MIN.
* SILT FENCE
lrvll�l �� 3 TYP.)
PSOC DEBRIS
STOC PILE
* SEE DETAIL 2/GO.6 FOR INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE
NOTES:
1. STOCK PILE HEIGHTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 35 FEET.
2. STOCK PILE SLOPES SHALL BE 3.1 OR FLATTER.
3. STOCK PILES SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY DO
NOT INTERFERE WITH ROADWAY SIGHT DISTANCES.
MAINTENANCE:
SEE DETAIL 2/130.6 FOR MAINTENANCE NOTES ON SILT FENCES.
NOT TO SCALE
5'
1' - 6"
FRONT VIEW
LU
SEDIMENT -�" L
z --** - 1 - 6" MIN
12"
w
STONE
2
FLOW
1 1, _ . 6"
_.._.
1 SECTION VIEW STONE
TIE EROSION
STRUCTURAL STONE SHALL BE CLASS B RIP RAP STONE FOR EROSION CONTROL
PURPOSES.
SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE IN STONE OUTLETS SHALL BE NO. 5 OR NO. 57 STONE.
LOCATIONS OF STONE OUTLETS HAVE BEEN INDICATED AT MAJOR LOW LYING
SEE PLAN FOR
_
THESE AREAS AS WELL AS LOCAL LOW LYING SPOTS. z
CONTROL LINER
MAINTENANCE: O
INSPECT THE SILT FENCE OUTFALL AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH -
' 1
VARYING DITCH
11
MIN. 12"
HEIGHTS
- 130.5 NTS Vi
EROSION
3
V
CONTROL LINER
0
LL
FIBER CHECK DAM
*VIEW IS FACING
DOWNSTREAM
MAINTENANCE:
ROLL (12" DIA.)
A
1. TEMPORARY FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE LOCATED AS U j
PAM
2. BEFORE INSTALLATION OF FIBER ROLL, SMOOTH AND SHAPE Uj
INSPECT CHECK DAMS AND CHANNELS FOR DAMAGE AFTER EACH
(2 OZ.)
WOODEN
STAKES SHALL BE
RUNOFF EVENT. ANTICIPATE SUBMERGENCE AND DEPOSITION ABOVE
STAPLE FABRIC INTO
SPACED 1'
ALONG THE ENTIRE
THE CHECK DAM AND EROSION FROM HIGH FLOWS AROUND THE EDGES
GROUND ON UPSTREAM &
LENGTH OF
THE FIBER ROLL.
OF THE DAM. CORRECT ALL DAMAGE IMMEDIATELY. IF SIGNIFICANT
DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF ROLL
PROVIDE
2 STAKES ANGLED AS
EROSION OCCURS BETWEEN DAMS, INSTALL A PROTECTIVE RIP -RAP
APPROXIMATELY 1 INCH UPSTREAM OF THE EDGE OF THE
ROLL. V
SHOWN.
6. SEE SHEET G2.16 FOR SPACING CHART OF FILTER FABRIC
LINER IN THAT PORTION OF THE CHANNEL. REMOVE SEDIMENT
ROLLS FOR EACH ROADSIDE DITCH.
W
7. PRIOR TO POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM) APPLICATION, OBTAIN A 0
ACCUMULATED BEHIND THE DAMS AS NEEDED TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO
BACKFILL AND COMPACT
OFFSITE MATERIAL, AND ANALYZE FOR APPROPRIATE PAM
FLOCCULANT TO BE APPLIED TO EACH FIBER CHECK DAM J
PAM
CHANNEL VEGETATION, ALLOW THE CHANNEL TO DRAIN THROUGH THE
T
LOOSE MAE RIAL
CHARGED PAM OVER FIBER CHECK DAM WHERE WATER WILL
FLOW AND 1 OUNCE OF PAM ON MATTING ON EACH SIDE OF LL
(1 OZ.)
1LaqTaFAta 17117 and I
FIBER CHECK DAM, AND PREVENT LARGE FLOWS FROM CARRYING
SEDIMENT OVER THE DAM. FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE CLEANED OUT
WHEN 50% OF STORAGE CAPACITY HAS BEEN FILLED IN WITH SEDIMENT.
REAPPLY PAM AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT THAT IS EQUAL TO OR
EXCEEDS 0.5 INCH.
6" (MIN.) SECTION
EMBEDMENT
PAM
(1 OZ.) 6" (MIN.)
EMBEDMENT
TEMPORARY FIBER CHECK DAM
NTS
GYYYYYYY, ,
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
GRADE
V MIN.
* SILT FENCE
lrvll�l �� 3 TYP.)
PSOC DEBRIS
STOC PILE
* SEE DETAIL 2/GO.6 FOR INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE
NOTES:
1. STOCK PILE HEIGHTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 35 FEET.
2. STOCK PILE SLOPES SHALL BE 3.1 OR FLATTER.
3. STOCK PILES SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY DO
NOT INTERFERE WITH ROADWAY SIGHT DISTANCES.
MAINTENANCE:
SEE DETAIL 2/130.6 FOR MAINTENANCE NOTES ON SILT FENCES.
NOT TO SCALE
5'
1' - 6"
FRONT VIEW
LU
SEDIMENT -�" L
z --** - 1 - 6" MIN
CONTROL
w
STONE
2
FLOW
1 1, _ . 6"
STRUCTURAL
1 SECTION VIEW STONE
NOTE:
STRUCTURAL STONE SHALL BE CLASS B RIP RAP STONE FOR EROSION CONTROL
PURPOSES.
SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE IN STONE OUTLETS SHALL BE NO. 5 OR NO. 57 STONE.
LOCATIONS OF STONE OUTLETS HAVE BEEN INDICATED AT MAJOR LOW LYING
AREAS. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND INSTALLING OUTLETS AT
THESE AREAS AS WELL AS LOCAL LOW LYING SPOTS. z
MAINTENANCE: O
INSPECT THE SILT FENCE OUTFALL AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH -
SIGNIFICANT (1/2 INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL EVENT AND REPAIR ANY DAMAGE
IMMEDIATELY. ADD STONES AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN THE DESIGN HEIGHT AND U
CROSS - SECTION OF THE OVERFLOW DAM.
4 SILT FENCE OUTLET H
- 130.5 NTS Vi
z
V
0
LL
0
w
NOTES:
TES: Q
1. TEMPORARY FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE LOCATED AS U j
SHOWN ON THE PLANS. J
2. BEFORE INSTALLATION OF FIBER ROLL, SMOOTH AND SHAPE Uj
EARTH SURFACE AND REMOVE ALL STONES, ROOTS, OR OTHER
DEBRIS GREATER THAN 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER.
3, EXCAVATE A TRENCH 3 INCHES DEEP FOR PLACEMENT OF
EACH ROLL O
4. STAKES SHALL BE 24" IN LENGTH SPACED 1 FOOT ON Z
CENTER ON THE UPSTREAM & DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE
FIBER ROLL.
5. FABRIC OF FIBER ROLL SHALL BE STAPLED INTO THE GROUND
APPROXIMATELY 1 INCH UPSTREAM OF THE EDGE OF THE
ROLL. V
6. SEE SHEET G2.16 FOR SPACING CHART OF FILTER FABRIC
ROLLS FOR EACH ROADSIDE DITCH.
W
7. PRIOR TO POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM) APPLICATION, OBTAIN A 0
SOIL SAMPLE FROM THE PROJECT LOCATION, AND FROM
OFFSITE MATERIAL, AND ANALYZE FOR APPROPRIATE PAM
FLOCCULANT TO BE APPLIED TO EACH FIBER CHECK DAM J
ROLL.
8. INITIALLY APPLY 2 OUNCES OF ANIONIC OR NEUTRALLY Z
CHARGED PAM OVER FIBER CHECK DAM WHERE WATER WILL
FLOW AND 1 OUNCE OF PAM ON MATTING ON EACH SIDE OF LL
FIBER CHECK DAM.
G0.5
G0.8

Q
�XZ
X30
OLO
N O Z
,axs
x�
oxs
00
on
LI
1`LY
r K
05�
�s�
>5w
04�
o "O
n¢
0oro
�Kqw
O r_4
0
vow
w'
IJ =p
-�w
S L CL
owoY
'Q+na
,y _ 0
onnow
ON-1
�
STAKE
AT V
INTERVALS
FIGURE 1
TOE SLOPE ANCHOR
TRENCH
INSTALLATION NOTES:
SITE PREPARATION
GRADE AND COMPACT AREA.
REMOVE ALL ROCKS, CLODS, VEGETATION, AND OBSTRUCTIONS SO
THAT MATTING WILL HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE SOIL.
PREPARE SEEDBED BY LOOSENING 3 TO 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL
ABOVE FINAL GRADE.
TEST SOILS FOR ANY NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES AND SUBMIT SOIL
TEST RESULTS TO THE ENGINEER. APPLY ANY TREATMENT SUCH
AS LIME OR FERTILIZERS TO THE SOIL IF NEEDED.
DO OT MULCH AREAS WHERE MAT IS TO BE INSTALLED.
SEEDING
SEE SHEET GO.5 FOR SEEDING REQUIREMENTS.
APPLY SEED TO SOIL BEFORE PLACING MATTING.
OVERLAP ADJACENT MATS 3" AND ANCHOR EVERY 12" ACROSS
THE OVERLAP. THE HIGHER ELEVATION MAT SHOULD BE PLACED
OVER THE LOWER ELEVATION MAT.
EDGES SHOULD BE SHINGLED AWAY FROM THE FLOW OF WATER.
LAY MAT LOOSE TO ALLOW CONTACT WITH SOIL.
DO NOT STRETCH TIGHT.
ANCHOR MAT USING BIODEGRADABLE STAKES OR PINS.
EXCAVATE INITIAL ANCHOR TRENCH 12 "X6" ACROSS TOE OF BANK
AT THE LOWER END OF EACH AREA TO RECEIVE EROSION
CONTROL MATTING. ANCHOR TRENCH TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1' OFF
OF TOE OF BANK. SEE FIGURE 1 FOR TOE SLOPE ANCHOR
D /RECT /OiV OF FLOW
�T L
JOL
'1
START NEW
ROLL IN
6„ CHECK SLOT,
OVERLAP
MINIMUM 1'
FIGURE 2
INTERMITTENT CHECK SLOT /
BEGINNING OF NEW ROLL
ffrWk .
PLACE 6" x 6" CHECK SLOTS AT 30' INTERVALS ALONG THE
BANK. SEE FIGURE 2.
CUT 4" x 4" TRENCH ALONG TOP OF BANK FOR MAT TERMINATION
AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 3. EXTEND MAT 3 FEET PAST TOP OF
BANK.
BEGINNING AT THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE AREA TO BE LINED,
PLACE THE END OF THE ROLL IN TOE SLOPE ANCHOR TRENCH
AND SECURE WITH BIODEGRADABLE STAKES OR PINS. SEE FIGURE
1.
PLACE ADJACENT ROLLS IN THE ANCHOR TRENCH WITH A MINIMUM
OF 3" OVERLAP. SECURE WITH BIODEGRADABLE STAKES OR
PINES, BACKFILL ANCHOR TRENCH, AND COMPACT SOIL.
UNROLL MAT OVER COMPACTED ANCHOR TRENCH, STOP AT NEXT
CHECK SLOT OR TERMINAL ANCHOR.
UNROLL ADJACENT ROLLS IN SAME MANNER, WITH A MINIMUM OF
3" OF OVERLAP.
STAPLE AT 12" INTERVALS ALONG OVERLAP.
F MAT IN CHECK SLOT, FOLD BACK AGAINST ITSELF, ANCHOR
OLD AND SECURE MAT ROLLS TIGHTLY INTO CHECK SLOTS. LAY
THROUGH BOTH LAYERS, BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL, CONTINUE
ROLLING MAT UPSTREAM. SEE FIGURE 2.
BEGIN NEW ROLLS IN CHECK SLOT, AND OVERLAP ENDS MINIMUM
OF 1'.
STREAM BANK MATTING TO BE INSTALLED FROM TOE OF BANK TO
TOP OF BANK. SEE FIGURE 3 FOR TERMINATION AT TOP OF BANK
AND FIGURE 1 FOR INITIAL ANCHOR TRENCH AT TOE OF BANK.
SEE FIGURE 3 FOR TERMINATION AT UPSTREAM END
W1 (FT.
4, j
It �
CS /RCP !
ELEVATION
W2
8" O.C.(TYP.)
REFER TO CHART
FOR BAR SIZE
�l�alil
v�
1`-
6�
4�
G ,
STAKE
AT 1'
1' INTERVALS
4„
--►I ' 14
FIGURE 3
TOP OF
EMBANKMENT /BANK
TERMINATION
EROSION CONTROL MATTING MUST MEET OR EXCEED
THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
* 100 % COCONUT FIBER (COIR) TWINE WOVEN INTO
A HIGH STRENGTH MATRIX.
• SHEAR STRESS -2.4 LBS /SOFT
• FLOW VELOCITY- OBSERVED 8 FT /SEC
1 1 EROSION CONTROL MATTING
100.61 NTS
Jw L
�.C.(TYP.)
R TO CHART
BAR SIZE
SILT FENCE DETAIL:
WHEN AND WHERE TO USE IT
SILT FENCE IS APPLICABLE IN AREAS:
WHERE THE MAXIMUM SHEET OR OVERLAND FLOW PATH LENGTH TO THE FENCE IS 100 -FEET.
WHERE THE MAXIMUM SLOPE STEEPNESS (NORMAL [PERPENDICULAR) TO FENCE LINE) IS
2H:1 V.
THAT DO NOT RECEIVE CONCENTRATED FLOWS GREATER THAN 0.5 CFS.
DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE ACROSS CHANNELS OR USE IT AS A VELOCITY CONTROL BMP.
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
1. USE A SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95% BY WEIGHT OF POLYOLEFINS OR
POLYESTER, WHICH IS CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER AS CONFORMING
TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM D 6461. SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC SHOULD CONTAIN
ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS
OF EXPECTED USABLE CONSTRUCTION LIFE AT A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF 0' TO 120' F.
2. ENSURE THAT POSTS FOR SEDIMENT FENCES ARE 1.33 LB /LINEAR FT STEEL WITH A
MINIMUM LENGTH OF 5 FEET. MAKE SURE THAT STEEL POSTS HAVE PROJECTIONS TO
FACILITATE FASTENING THE FABRIC.
3. FOR REINFORCEMENT OF STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC, USE WIRE FENCE WITH A
MINIMUM 14 GAUGE AND A MAXIMUM MESH SPACING OF 6 INCHES.
CONSTRUCTION:
1. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENT BARRIER OF STANDARD STRENGTH OR EXTRA STRENGTH
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS.
2. ENSURE THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED 24 INCHES
ABOVE THE GROUND SURFACE. (HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF WATER
SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURE.)
3. CONSTRUCT THE FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE
BARRIER TO AVOID JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, SECURELY FASTEN THE
FILTER CLOTH ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH 4 FEET MINIMUM OVERLAP TO THE NEXT
POST.
4. SUPPORT STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC BY WIRE MESH FASTENED SECURELY TO
THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS. EXTEND THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT TO THE BOTTOM
OF THE TRENCH. FASTEN THE WIRE REINFORCEMENT, THEN FABRIC ON THE UPSLOPE
SIDE OF THE FENCE POST. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM 50
POUND TENSILE STRENGTH.
5. WHEN A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE IS USED, SPACE POSTS A MAXIMUM OF 8 FEET
APART. SUPPORT POSTS SHOULD BE DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND A MINIMUM
OF 24 INCHES.
6. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH 6 FEET POST SPACING DOES NOT REQUIRE WIRE
MESH SUPPORT FENCE. SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC DIRECTLY TO POSTS.
WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM 50 POUND TENSILE STRENGTH.
7. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP ALONG THE
PROPOSED LINE OF POSTS AND UPSLOPE FROM THE BARRIER.
8. PLACE 12 INCHES OF THE FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE OF THE TRENCH.
9. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND COMPACT.
THOROUGH COMPACTION OF THE BACKFILL IS CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE PERFORMANCE.
10. DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES.
MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL. MAKE ANY
REQUIRED REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY.
SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME
INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT PROMPTLY.
REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR
THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID
UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT.
REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA
TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY
STABILIZED.
* ALL ELEMENTS PRECAST TO MEET ASTM C913.
* WELDED WIRE FABRIC MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR REBAR
AS LONG AS THE SAME AREA OF STEEL IS PROVIDED.
* CHAMFER ALL CORNERS 1" OR HAVE A RADIUS OF i ".
NOTE: THE MINIMUM BAR SIZE SHALL BE 45 BARS
AT 8" CTS.THE CONTRACTOR WILL HAVE THE OPTION
TO INCREASE THIS BAR SIZE AS NEEDED.
ENDWALL DIMENSIONS
Z
MINIMUM
O rn
MIN. /MAX.
H
NOTES:
F-' Q
BAR SIZE
Q �
H2(FT.)
D (FT.)
' THIS PRECAST ENDWALL MAY BE USED FOR THE FOLLOWING
N rr �C.a
STANDARDS: 838.21, 838.27, 838.33 AND 838.39.
U- J CD H Z
* INSTALL PRECAST ENDWALLS WITH WINGS AND PAY
0 O =
FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION SECTION 838.
W Q Q _
* USE 4000 PSI CONCRETE.
Q 0 O H
" PROVIDE ALL REINFORCING STEEL WHICH MEETS ASTM A615
I- S ~ Z UJ
FOR GRADE 60 AND WELDED WIRE FABRIC CONFORMING
O
TO ASTM A185 WITH 2" MIN. CLEARANCE.
O 0 0 Q
* PLACE LIFT HOLES OR PINS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
OC
Z H
OSHA STANDARD 1926.704.
2.0
N
' PIPE TO BE GROUTED INTO HEADWALL AT JOB SITE BY
4.00/4.75
W d
CONTRACTOR
ti
O
* ALL ELEMENTS PRECAST TO MEET ASTM C913.
* WELDED WIRE FABRIC MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR REBAR
AS LONG AS THE SAME AREA OF STEEL IS PROVIDED.
* CHAMFER ALL CORNERS 1" OR HAVE A RADIUS OF i ".
NOTE: THE MINIMUM BAR SIZE SHALL BE 45 BARS
AT 8" CTS.THE CONTRACTOR WILL HAVE THE OPTION
TO INCREASE THIS BAR SIZE AS NEEDED.
ENDWALL DIMENSIONS
FT.
MINIMUM
MIN. /MAX.
MIN. /MAX.
MIN. /MAX.
MIN. /MAX. MIN. /MAX.
PIPE DIA.
BAR SIZE
H1(FT.)
H2(FT.)
D (FT.)
W1 W2
1.0
#5 @ 8"
1.25/2.00
2.00/3.75
1.25/1.75
3.00/3.75 5.50/6.00
1.25
#5 @ 8"
1.25/2.00
3.00/3.75
1.25/2.00
3.5013.75 6.50/6.75
1.50
#5 @ 8"
1.2512.00
3.0014.25
1.50/2.50
3.50/3.75 6.5016.75
2.0
#5 @ 8"
1.5012.50
4.00/4.75
1.75/2.50
4.00/4.25 7.50/8.25
2.5
#6 @ 8"
2.50/3.50
4.00/6.00
2.00/3.00
4.50/5.50 10.00/11.50
3.0
#5 @ 8"
3.00/3.50
5.00/6.00
2.75/3.50
5.2515.75 11.50/11.75
3.5
#5 @ 8"
3.25/4.50
6.0016.75
3.25/3.50
6.0016.75 12.00/13.25
4.0
#5 @ 8"
3.50/4.50
6.50/7.00
3.25/3.50
6.50/6.75 13.00/13.25
4.5
#5 @ 8"
4.00/5.00
6.50/8.50
3.25/4.00
7.00/9.25 13.50/15.75
5.0
#5 @ 8"
4.50/5.00
7.00/8.50
3.25/4.00
7.25/9.25 13.75115.75
5.5
#5 @ 8"
4.50/5.00
7.50/8.50
3.25/4.00
7.25/9.25 14.00/15.75
6.0
#5 @ 8"
4.50/5.00 1
7.50/8.50
3.25/4.00
1 7.75/9.25 14.75/16.75
PRE -CAST ENDWALL
NTS
J y
O 0)
.5 0)
LL Oct C
H Z
Q LU a
LU a
O t- '
LAJ
Q Z)
Z)
o � cc
Q N
O
N
S T
cn y Lu
0 t¢.1 z
Z L11
W =
t3. CC
0
LL
0
1.25 LB. /LINEAR FT. STEEL
EXTRA STRENGTH
FILTER FABRIC
WITH WIRE FENCE
BACKFILL TRENCH
COMPACTED EARTH
Mqk
STq't'O
\BRip
USE EITHER FLAT-BOTTOM-
OR V- BOTTOM TRENCH
SHOWN BELOW
SILT FENCE INSTALLATION
HEAVY DUTY PLASTIC TIE
FOR STEEL POSTS
r�1c��y4 =1dr
z
z
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
DRAVANG SCALE
AS SHOWN
�WK
W DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(626) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
APPROVALS
DRAWN BY
RAS
PROJECT DATE
JULY 2012
BIDDING
APPROVED -BY
JPK
PROJECT NUMBER
80376.00.H1
CONSTRUCTION
FLEE NAME
8031MAR..DE YAI(,S.DWO
COMPACTED
RECORD DWG.
J y
O 0)
.5 0)
LL Oct C
H Z
Q LU a
LU a
O t- '
LAJ
Q Z)
Z)
o � cc
Q N
O
N
S T
cn y Lu
0 t¢.1 z
Z L11
W =
t3. CC
0
LL
0
1.25 LB. /LINEAR FT. STEEL
EXTRA STRENGTH
FILTER FABRIC
WITH WIRE FENCE
BACKFILL TRENCH
COMPACTED EARTH
Mqk
STq't'O
\BRip
USE EITHER FLAT-BOTTOM-
OR V- BOTTOM TRENCH
SHOWN BELOW
SILT FENCE INSTALLATION
HEAVY DUTY PLASTIC TIE
FOR STEEL POSTS
r�1c��y4 =1dr
FILTER
FABRIC
4 -IN.
FLAT - BOTTOM TRENCH DETAIL
- FILTER FABRIC
V- SHAPED TRENCH DETAIL
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
z E
G0.6 NTS
ELEVATION VIEW
21� 9)/2r,
1%8„ x X34„
" SUPPOR
11 BASE _ PLATE
ATE TS 6 "x8'
STEEL TI
PLAN VIEW
STRUCTURE PLANS (SEE NOTES)
ROUTED OFFSET BLOCK
W6 X 8.5
4
m -It SUPPORT
t =1
CONC. ANCHORS
ELEVATION VIEW
1' -7"
041 2 ., V -2„ 21/2"
" BASE It
T_ o o rk SUPPORT
tN _
N ( 7" 7"
1 i/8" X 0/4" SLOTS
(FOR ADJUSTMENTS)
PLAN VIEW
NOTES FOR:
GUARDRAIL POST ANCHORED TO STRUCTURE:
-USE FULL LENGTH 1/4" BUTT WELDS AT ALL LOCATIONS OF CONTACT BETWEEN THE BASE PLATE, SUPPORT PLATES AND STEEL POST OR STEEL TUBE.
-USE POST AND POST BASE PLATES CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF A.S.T.M. A -36 AND GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION TO CONFORM TO A.S.T.M. A -123.
-USE WOOD POSTS WHICH FIT SNUGLY IN THE STEEL TUBE WITH A MAXIMUM OF 1/8" CLEARANCE BETWEEN TUBE WALL AND POST.
NEW STRUCTURES:
-ATTACH P OS T TO INSERT A SS EMBLY UNITS (USING ANCHOR BOLTS SU PPLIED WITH INSERTS) WHICH HAVE BEEN CAST INTO THE S TR UC T U R E DURING CONSTRUCTION.
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
-USE CONCRETE ANCHORS CONSISTING OF A STUD BOLT WITH NUT AND WASHER. USE STUDS THREADED ON ONE END AND HAVING AN EXPANDED WEDGE ASSEMBLY POSITIONED
AROUND A TAPERED AREA AT THE OTHER END. USE ANCHORS WHICH PROVIDE A MINIMUM SAFE HOLDING POWER OF 2875 LBS. FOR A 3/4" OR 1" DIAMETER BOLT. CALCULATE
HOLDING POWER BASED ON 1/4 THE ACTUAL HOLDING POWER OF THE ANCHOR IN 3500 PSI CONCRETE AS DETERMINED BY AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL TESTING LABORATORY.
-USE ANCHORS GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.S.T.M. A -153. SIZE HOLES FOR THE CONCRETE ANCHORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ANCHOR
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. DRILL HOLES WITH A CARBIDE OR DIAMOND TIPPED MASONRY BIT POWERED BY A ROTARY OR ROTARY IMPACT DRILL.
NO OTHER IMPACT TOOLS WILL BE PERMITTED. DRILL HOLES VERTICALLY. FURNISH DOCUMENTATION OF HOLE SIZE RECOMMENDED FOR THE SPECIFIED ANCHOR TO THE ENGINEER
BEFORE DRILLING HOLES. THOROUGHLY CLEAN HOLES FOR ANCHORS OF ALL CONCRETE CHIPS, DUST, GREASE, OIL, ETC. BEFORE ANCHORS ARE INSTALLED. REPAIR ALL
DAMAGE CAUSED BY THIS WORK TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.
ANCHORAGE FOR GUARDRAIL POST ON BOX CULVERT
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
GUARD RAIL ANCHOR
NTS
DETAILS
Z
O �
Qa
H =(}C_-)
015
00
O
LIJ <.c� U_
QV[�0C9
Cn i= -~OW
Cr
C) a)
t- >
Uj� H
U�
F_
W
}
J
O
U
OH m
z z Z
0
0 E-
O
O = a
cc Z -j
F- O Uj
C/) <
H
J 0
Z E' LL
W LU
Q
fL
Z
CJ
Q
.0^
1A
U
ac
V
U
LL
i
G0.6 l
G0 .8
z
z
FILTER FABRIC
FILTER FABRIC
N
N
COMPACTED
o
COMPACTED
EARTH
EARTH
z
z
I
RUNOFF
00
RUNOFF
00
Z
I
�:
f I.
Z =5
Co
. ,. .._
i I
1 i
I
00
NZ
FILTER
FABRIC
4 -IN.
FLAT - BOTTOM TRENCH DETAIL
- FILTER FABRIC
V- SHAPED TRENCH DETAIL
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
z E
G0.6 NTS
ELEVATION VIEW
21� 9)/2r,
1%8„ x X34„
" SUPPOR
11 BASE _ PLATE
ATE TS 6 "x8'
STEEL TI
PLAN VIEW
STRUCTURE PLANS (SEE NOTES)
ROUTED OFFSET BLOCK
W6 X 8.5
4
m -It SUPPORT
t =1
CONC. ANCHORS
ELEVATION VIEW
1' -7"
041 2 ., V -2„ 21/2"
" BASE It
T_ o o rk SUPPORT
tN _
N ( 7" 7"
1 i/8" X 0/4" SLOTS
(FOR ADJUSTMENTS)
PLAN VIEW
NOTES FOR:
GUARDRAIL POST ANCHORED TO STRUCTURE:
-USE FULL LENGTH 1/4" BUTT WELDS AT ALL LOCATIONS OF CONTACT BETWEEN THE BASE PLATE, SUPPORT PLATES AND STEEL POST OR STEEL TUBE.
-USE POST AND POST BASE PLATES CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF A.S.T.M. A -36 AND GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION TO CONFORM TO A.S.T.M. A -123.
-USE WOOD POSTS WHICH FIT SNUGLY IN THE STEEL TUBE WITH A MAXIMUM OF 1/8" CLEARANCE BETWEEN TUBE WALL AND POST.
NEW STRUCTURES:
-ATTACH P OS T TO INSERT A SS EMBLY UNITS (USING ANCHOR BOLTS SU PPLIED WITH INSERTS) WHICH HAVE BEEN CAST INTO THE S TR UC T U R E DURING CONSTRUCTION.
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
-USE CONCRETE ANCHORS CONSISTING OF A STUD BOLT WITH NUT AND WASHER. USE STUDS THREADED ON ONE END AND HAVING AN EXPANDED WEDGE ASSEMBLY POSITIONED
AROUND A TAPERED AREA AT THE OTHER END. USE ANCHORS WHICH PROVIDE A MINIMUM SAFE HOLDING POWER OF 2875 LBS. FOR A 3/4" OR 1" DIAMETER BOLT. CALCULATE
HOLDING POWER BASED ON 1/4 THE ACTUAL HOLDING POWER OF THE ANCHOR IN 3500 PSI CONCRETE AS DETERMINED BY AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL TESTING LABORATORY.
-USE ANCHORS GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.S.T.M. A -153. SIZE HOLES FOR THE CONCRETE ANCHORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ANCHOR
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. DRILL HOLES WITH A CARBIDE OR DIAMOND TIPPED MASONRY BIT POWERED BY A ROTARY OR ROTARY IMPACT DRILL.
NO OTHER IMPACT TOOLS WILL BE PERMITTED. DRILL HOLES VERTICALLY. FURNISH DOCUMENTATION OF HOLE SIZE RECOMMENDED FOR THE SPECIFIED ANCHOR TO THE ENGINEER
BEFORE DRILLING HOLES. THOROUGHLY CLEAN HOLES FOR ANCHORS OF ALL CONCRETE CHIPS, DUST, GREASE, OIL, ETC. BEFORE ANCHORS ARE INSTALLED. REPAIR ALL
DAMAGE CAUSED BY THIS WORK TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.
ANCHORAGE FOR GUARDRAIL POST ON BOX CULVERT
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
GUARD RAIL ANCHOR
NTS
DETAILS
Z
O �
Qa
H =(}C_-)
015
00
O
LIJ <.c� U_
QV[�0C9
Cn i= -~OW
Cr
C) a)
t- >
Uj� H
U�
F_
W
}
J
O
U
OH m
z z Z
0
0 E-
O
O = a
cc Z -j
F- O Uj
C/) <
H
J 0
Z E' LL
W LU
Q
fL
Z
CJ
Q
.0^
1A
U
ac
V
U
LL
i
G0.6 l
G0 .8

N
�-�Z
O3�
O
�oz
Z <
z
z0
oz*
UO
VO
I�wK
N Z
O -V
03°°
'N
o <w
a
MZ0
a -may
�0zM
0
boo
'P
it ;moo
�zo�
r!F>
KUIN1m
m
?o'w oo
V
, oz'�Oo
'4waw
z �zm
oom
6xm<
N
y0z�
o •°
_mom
8090
o00N
BUTTON HEAD
BOLT LONGL
THRU RAIL AND
POST WITH NUT
AND STD. WASHER
H
z
w
J
0
0
CL
4
V'
1
00
,
in-
Z
O
BEARING PLATE ~ Q
6 -3 p BUFFERED END SECTION Z _
M00V
y CABLE ASSEMBLY p O O n.. = z
10d NAILS W MC Z LL
QUOdCOZU'-
�� _ --- S' n- - - - -- T-liz �I
0 0 �� ~� W
fro
O lA
"W" BEAM RAIL Z F" H
END SECTION ASSEMBLY - PLAN o
PAY LIMITS
BUTTON HEAD BOLT (10"
1` 4" LONG ) THRU RAIL AND
1'_0" ANCHOR PLATE "W" POST WITH NUT AND
W BEAM STD. WASHER
ASSEMBLY RAIL
AkFx (D
Y L
j
/ //, - - -- - --- ---- Q J
SHORT WOOD BREAKAWAY POST /% 10d NAILS -QTY. 2 0
(SEE SHEET 4 OF 7) // I BEARING PLATE C3 CO)
STD. LINE POST CABLE ASSEMBLY
6' -6 "t LONG Ti. ; Z
J
I¢ N
BREAKAWAY TERMINAL - Q
POST SLEEVE STEEL TUBE
EXTENDS 2" g ; ;

r L
Y �
U ~O
ti
NOz
Ld-Q
YwI
c� p
w
MWY
W +W
L O
�r$ri
p5�w
CVtJW
Apo °'o
0
ZOO
U tt
Joao
N
oowo
zwmw
s�
onp_,
Yd.0.4
pOC/y
p
00
•asw
S2 a
-C20~
U p p N
UPPER ENTRENCHMENT
(SEE DETAIL A, THIS SHEET)
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT 0//
o
d i E ! -E
ANCHOR (TYP, / /// 0/// PREVAIL /
SEE DETAIL C, ��/ / I NG WIND
THIS SHEET) / C� 0 �// 0/
OVERLAP JOINT
(TYP, SEE DETAIL F,
THIS SHEET) 0/0 / / / I I { I I {
0/ 0 0/
O
LOWER ENTRENCHMENT // Ca
(SEE DETAIL B, THIS SHEET) �/
d
// C
�IC
EI�I �i �Iiv=
III Iii
0/ � 1i �i��- Vii{ _ {
~-
ISOMETRIC
HINGE POINT
TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT —\
FACE OF SLOPE
(PREPARED SUBGRADE)
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT ON SLOPE
NTS
COMPACTED BACKFILL
600 MM (2 FT) ^
z
MIN
, T
f
!77,
I i tl 1il— III i.
1.0 FT (MIN.) R
ANCHOR
FACE OF SLOPE
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
COMPACTED BACKFILL
N
I2
t
f-
0.5 FT
0
ANCHOR
1 x-1.5" DIA
z STEEL WASHER
0.20 IN. DIA STEEL
DETAIL C — ANCHOR PIN DETAIL_
Mil
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
DRAW9NG SCALE
AS SHOWN
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
UPPER ENTRENCHMENT
(SEE DETAIL A, THIS SHEET)
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT 0//
o
d i E ! -E
ANCHOR (TYP, / /// 0/// PREVAIL /
SEE DETAIL C, ��/ / I NG WIND
THIS SHEET) / C� 0 �// 0/
OVERLAP JOINT
(TYP, SEE DETAIL F,
THIS SHEET) 0/0 / / / I I { I I {
0/ 0 0/
O
LOWER ENTRENCHMENT // Ca
(SEE DETAIL B, THIS SHEET) �/
d
// C
�IC
EI�I �i �Iiv=
III Iii
0/ � 1i �i��- Vii{ _ {
~-
ISOMETRIC
HINGE POINT
TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT —\
FACE OF SLOPE
(PREPARED SUBGRADE)
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT ON SLOPE
NTS
COMPACTED BACKFILL
600 MM (2 FT) ^
z
MIN
, T
f
!77,
I i tl 1il— III i.
1.0 FT (MIN.) R
ANCHOR
FACE OF SLOPE
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
COMPACTED BACKFILL
N
I2
t
f-
0.5 FT
0
ANCHOR
1 x-1.5" DIA
z STEEL WASHER
0.20 IN. DIA STEEL
DETAIL C — ANCHOR PIN DETAIL_
Mil
COMPACTED BACKFILL
NIA
2 FT
MIN
TURF REINFORCEMENT MA
FLOW 1 FT
I MIN I
\ ^ J
O
ANCHOR
DETAIL D — INITIAL ANCHOR TRENCH
(DOWNSTREAM)
NTS
DETAIL E — TERMINAL ANCHOR TRENCH
(UPSTREAM)
NTS
SYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT MATTING
9/y W HP;.�
NTS
NOTE: FOR CLARITY, PERSPECTIVE VIEW DOES NOT
SHOW ALL ANCHORS.
TRANSVERSE JOINT
PLACED EVERY 8 M (26.2 FT)
(PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW DIRECTION)
(TYP)
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
OVERLAP JOINT
(TYP, SEE DETAIL F,
THIS SHEET)
FILL
TERMINAL ANCHOR TRENCH
(SEE DETAIL E, THIS SHEET)
CD / -off- /
V
ANCHOR PATTERN <� c� // / CD
(TYP, �
DETAIL G, �;., i 3 c //
THIS
S EE 4>
/ c C-
//
KEY TRENCH (TYP, /
(Z.a
SEE DETAIL A,�
THIS SHEET)
CD Cd
f
-
INITIAL ANCHOR TRENCH
(SEE DETAIL D, THIS SHEET)
PERSPECTIVE
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
COVERED —
EDGE
OVERLAPPING —
EDGE
i
FLOW
' L
4 IN MIN. (TYP)
DETAIL F — TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
OVERLAP JOINT
NTS
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
ANCHOR (TYP)
I
'1�Ilifit � i
r M
ITH- j a
t t- 14
L �
i
1.5 FT
(TYP)
3 FT (TYP)
DETAIL G — ANCHOR PATTERN
NTS
NOTE: DETAILS ON THIS SHEET WERE OBTAINED / DRAWN
BY PROPEX GEOSYNTHETICS. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE
MANUFACTURER AS SHOWN OR APPROVED EQUAL.
MINIMUM SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED 5 LB /SF.
DETAILS
2 FT
MIN
KEY TRENCH
•
•
O:
GO.8
I
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
DRAW9NG SCALE
AS SHOWN
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
�WK (828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
W DICKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
DRAM 6Y
RAB
PROJECT GATE
JULY 2012
BIDDING
APPROVED 9Y
JPK
PROJECT NUMBER
80376.00.HI
CONSTRUCTION
F,LE NAMF
803/CAR ?rTAIES.OW(;
RECORD DWG.
COMPACTED BACKFILL
NIA
2 FT
MIN
TURF REINFORCEMENT MA
FLOW 1 FT
I MIN I
\ ^ J
O
ANCHOR
DETAIL D — INITIAL ANCHOR TRENCH
(DOWNSTREAM)
NTS
DETAIL E — TERMINAL ANCHOR TRENCH
(UPSTREAM)
NTS
SYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT MATTING
9/y W HP;.�
NTS
NOTE: FOR CLARITY, PERSPECTIVE VIEW DOES NOT
SHOW ALL ANCHORS.
TRANSVERSE JOINT
PLACED EVERY 8 M (26.2 FT)
(PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW DIRECTION)
(TYP)
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
OVERLAP JOINT
(TYP, SEE DETAIL F,
THIS SHEET)
FILL
TERMINAL ANCHOR TRENCH
(SEE DETAIL E, THIS SHEET)
CD / -off- /
V
ANCHOR PATTERN <� c� // / CD
(TYP, �
DETAIL G, �;., i 3 c //
THIS
S EE 4>
/ c C-
//
KEY TRENCH (TYP, /
(Z.a
SEE DETAIL A,�
THIS SHEET)
CD Cd
f
-
INITIAL ANCHOR TRENCH
(SEE DETAIL D, THIS SHEET)
PERSPECTIVE
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
COVERED —
EDGE
OVERLAPPING —
EDGE
i
FLOW
' L
4 IN MIN. (TYP)
DETAIL F — TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
OVERLAP JOINT
NTS
PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
ANCHOR (TYP)
I
'1�Ilifit � i
r M
ITH- j a
t t- 14
L �
i
1.5 FT
(TYP)
3 FT (TYP)
DETAIL G — ANCHOR PATTERN
NTS
NOTE: DETAILS ON THIS SHEET WERE OBTAINED / DRAWN
BY PROPEX GEOSYNTHETICS. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE
MANUFACTURER AS SHOWN OR APPROVED EQUAL.
MINIMUM SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED 5 LB /SF.
DETAILS
2 FT
MIN
KEY TRENCH
•
•
O:
GO.8
I

=Q
Z
~X�
030
�o
F_
ZF-Q
F-W=
zcn�
oo;�
W U O Ld
= Z X
F' Wes'
oOf�
W F
z
W
O F U
off°
�F-�V)
:D Q =
0 LW
Ld�zo
d - J
Q W
O Z
uj 0 U
� °o1 W
w�' W
LLJ
;-
�o
X U W m
J .000
Q U ~
0
U ~ZLJ
?000
U)
oV) oz
U OW
F-
�WmW
Z J = m
�
W 0 K J
Y o- Q
U O C S
-J
Z
XOZW
�V,
OQ ° °Q
f- ��sW
=Z �
x
�o�
Q
OOUC?
000(n
VICINITY MAP - WATAUGA COUNTY
NOT TO SCALE
STREAM IMPACT TABLE- DIVISION 2
RWH N/A HICKORY, NC 28602
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE Rh WK (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER WDICKSON BIDDING
JPK 80376.00.HI Office Locations:
FILE NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION
80376AR_OVERALL.DWG South Carolina
STREAM
PAGE
PERMANENT (P)
TYPE OF
SPOT SHOT
PERENNIAL (PER) OR
TYPE OF
AVERAGE
IMPACT
PAGE .
OR TEMPORARY I
IMPACT
NUMBER
OR TEMPORARY
IMPACT.
STREAM NAME
INTERMITTENT (INT)?
JURISDICTION
STREAM
WIDTH (FT)
LENGTH (LF)
WETLAND- F
NUMBER
(T)
SEWER /CULVERT
PROPOSED GRAVEL
DRIVE
; rr
Meadow Creek 1,
Impact S12
G2.5
P
Culvert
Meadow Creek 1
PER
Corps
5
55
Meadow Creek 1,
Impact S13
G2.5
T
Excavation
Meadow -Creek 1
INT
- Corps
10
103
PROPOSED RIGHT OF
Tributary 2,
Impact S14
G2.7
T
Excavation
Tributary 2
PER
Corps
6
13
EASEMENT
Tributary 1,
Impact S15
G2.7
T
Excavation
Tributary 1
PER
Corps
5
80
River
South Fork New
G2.7
T
Intake Gallery
STREAM IMPACT TABLE- DIVISION 2
RWH N/A HICKORY, NC 28602
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE Rh WK (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER WDICKSON BIDDING
JPK 80376.00.HI Office Locations:
FILE NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION
80376AR_OVERALL.DWG South Carolina
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE - DIVISION 2
STREAM
PAGE
PERMANENT (P)
TYPE OF
SPOT SHOT
PERENNIAL (PER) OR
TYPE OF
AVERAGE
IMPACT
PAGE .
OR TEMPORARY I
IMPACT
NUMBER
OR TEMPORARY
IMPACT.
STREAM NAME
INTERMITTENT (INT)?
JURISDICTION
STREAM
WIDTH (FT)
LENGTH (LF)
WETLAND- F
NUMBER
(T)
SEWER /CULVERT
PROPOSED GRAVEL
DRIVE
; rr
Meadow Creek 1,
Impact S12
G2.5
P
Culvert
Meadow Creek 1
PER
Corps
5
55
Meadow Creek 1,
Impact S13
G2.5
T
Excavation
Meadow -Creek 1
INT
- Corps
10
103
PROPOSED RIGHT OF
Tributary 2,
Impact S14
G2.7
T
Excavation
Tributary 2
PER
Corps
6
13
EASEMENT
Tributary 1,
Impact S15
G2.7
T
Excavation
Tributary 1
PER
Corps
5
80
South Fork New
G2.7
T
Intake Gallery
South Fork
PER
Corps
100
160
SHALL ARRANGE & COORDINATE
River, .Impact S16
Construction
New
EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT OF
R/ W
WAY LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD WIRES
OW
EXISTING FENCELINE
_X _X
EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS
T _
LINE
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
- -
EXISTING TREELINE
EXISTING WETLANDS
w y
EXISTING WETLANDS,
W W W d W v W v
PERMANENT IMPACTS
W W W V W W W W
EXISTING WETLANDS,
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
;
Q
U
EXISTING STREAM,
PERMANENT IMPACTS
U
EXISTING STREAM,
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
SILT FENCE,
U
SEE DETAIL 2/GO.6
Z
U
U
ROCK INLET CONTROL,
SEE DETAIL 3/GO.5
0
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE,
SEE DETAIL 1 /GO.5
0
W
FIBER CHECK DAM,
U
SEE DETAIL 5/GO.5
W
SILT FENCE OUTFALL,
SEE DETAIL 4/GO.5
ROCK CHECK DAM,
SEE DETAIL 5/G2.15
U
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE - DIVISION 2
WETLAND P
PROPOSED GRADING
PERMANENT (P) A
SPOT SHOT
REVISED IMPACT TABLES FOR 401/404 RESUBMISSION
AREA OF
IMPACT N
PAGE .
OR TEMPORARY I
.TYPE OF T
TYPE OF T
FORESTED I
TYPE OF
IMPACT A
DATE
NUMBER O
IMPACT W
WETLAND- F
PROPOSED STORM
SEWER /CULVERT
PROPOSED GRAVEL
DRIVE
; rr
POINT. OF TANGENCY
ALONG PROPOSED ROAD
CENTERLINE
PROPERTY CORNER
Q
IRON ROD
O
PROPOSED RIGHT OF
WAY EASEMENT
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
­­iLOD�
STORM DRAINAGE
SDE
EASEMENT
PROPOSED CENTERLINE
OF DITCH
PROPOSED WATERLINE
(SEE DIVISION 4 SHEETS)
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC LINE (CONTRACTOR
UE UE
SHALL ARRANGE & COORDINATE
WITH POWER COMPANY)
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
e
EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT OF
R/ W
WAY LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD WIRES
OW
EXISTING FENCELINE
_X _X
EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS
T _
LINE
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
- -
EXISTING TREELINE
EXISTING WETLANDS
w y
EXISTING WETLANDS,
W W W d W v W v
PERMANENT IMPACTS
W W W V W W W W
EXISTING WETLANDS,
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
;
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED PLANS CONTAINED WITHIN THE G2 SERIES SHEETS CONSIST OF THE
ACCESS ROAD TO THE RAW WATER INTAKE BUILDING AND SITE PLAN WORK FOR THE RAW WATER INTAKE
BUILDING. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CULVERT CROSSINGS PROPOSED THAT RUN UNDERNEATH THE PROPOSED
ACCESS ROAD. THIS SECTION OF THE PROJECT PLANS ALSO INCLUDES TWO STAGES OF EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROLS THAT APPLY TO THE ACCESS ROAD AND RAW WATER INTAKE SITES. THE PROJECT
IS LOCATED WITHIN THE 100 -YEAR FEMA FLOODPLAIN OF THE SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON SHEETS G2.8 THROUGH
G2.10 BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. SEE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE (THIS SHEET) FOR MORE
INFORMATION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCESS THE PROJECT SITE THROUGH CRANBERRY SRPINGS ROAD AT THE
PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD ENTRANCE. CONSTRUCTION OF CULVERT P-1 IS NECESSARY TO BEGIN
CONSTRUCTION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CAUTION WHILE CROSSING AT MEADOW CREEK SO AS NOT TO DISTURB THE
EXISTING STREAM ANY MORE THAN IS NECESSARY.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL MATERIAL REMOVED OFFSITE IN SAFE AND LEGAL MANNER.
5. ALL DE- WATERING REQUIRED TO EXECUTE WORK SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS 2 & 3, SHEET GO.7.
6. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE INSIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE THROUGHOUT
CONSTRUCTION.
7. WHERE PRACTICABLE, HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE OPERATED FROM THE STREAM OR WETLAND
BANKS IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENTATION. WHERE THIS IN NOT POSSIBLE, ONLY
WELL- MAINTAINED, CLEAN EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE USED INSIDE STREAMS & WETLANDS. SPILL
CONTAINMENT EQUIPMENT /MATERIALS SHOULD BE READILY AVAILABLE ON SITE FOR THE DURATION
OF THE PROJECT.
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE & GRADING NOTES:
1. PIPE INVERT ELEVATIONS HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SLOPES. HOWEVER, SLOPES SHALL NOT BE
DECREASED FROM THOSE SHOWN ON PLAN WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER.
2. POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL GRADED AREAS.
3. ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS NOTED ON THE PLAN. PIPE LENGTHS
INDICATED ON PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.
4. NO SOIL DISTURBANCE OR COMPACTION, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, TRAFFIC, TRENCHING, OR OTHER
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY SHALL BE PERMITTED BEYOND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WITHOUT PRIOR
APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN
ACTUAL CONDITION AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FOR INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING.
6. EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AT 1' INTERVALS.
7. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ARE FINISHED GRADES.
8. ALL PIPES, FITTINGS & STRUCTURES SHALL BE PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
9. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DESCRIPTION OF SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL AND COMPACTION
REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUITABLE MATERIAL AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE FINAL
PROJECT GRADES.
10. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHOWN IN PLANS IS CONSIDERED TO BE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
CONTRACTOR TO REMAIN WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AT ALL TIMES. ANY DAMAGE TO
ADJACENT PROPERTY CAUSED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR
OR REPLACE TO ORIGINAL OR SUPERIOR CONDITION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR ANY REGULATORY RESTITUTION CAUSED BY NOT REMAINING WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
11. CONTRACTOR MUST ESTABLISH GROUNDCOVER ON EXPOSED SLOPES PER THE "GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE" ON SHEET GO.5.
12. SIDE SLOPES IN GRADED AREAS & GRASS SWALES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 3:1 UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE.
13. VEGETATED BUFFERS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES &
SURFACE WATER ASSOCIATED WITH THE ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE. BUFFERS SHALL BE
MAINTAINED AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
14. WETLANDS & STREAMS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE ACCESS ROAD
& INTAKE SITE PROJECT. SEE THE ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE DATA TABLE LOCATED ON THIS
SHEET FOR THESE QUANTITIES, AND SHEETS G2.5, G2.6, & G2.7 FOR THE WETLAND & STREAM
IMPACT LOCATIONS.
15. THE SITEWORK IS LOCATED WITHIN THE 100 -YEAR FEMA FLOODPLAIN OF SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER.
SEE SHEET G2.1 FOR LOCATION OF 100 -YEAR AND 500 -YEAR FEMA FLOODPLAIN LINES.
EROSION CONTROL:
1. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: f 8.20 AC. (FOR ACCESS ROAD AND RAW WATER INTAKE SITE ONLY)
2. MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N.C.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT AREAS.
CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE AN APPROVED COPY OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT ON
SITE AT ALL TIMES.
4. SEE EROSION CONTROL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
5. DE- WATERING OF THE WORK AREAS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION
IN ORDER TO KEEP THE WORK AREA DRY.
6. STAGING AREAS AND MATERIAL STOCKPILES FOR THIS PROJECT ARE TO BE LOCATED TO PREVENT
SOIL AND SEDIMENT LOSS. STOCKPILES OF FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE ENCOMPASSED BY SILT FENCE
EXCEPT FOR THE POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE STOCKPILE AREA. STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS
MUST BE LOCATED OUTSIDE FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOODWAY.
UTILITY COORDINATION:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT NC ONE -CALL AT 1- 800 -632 -4949 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UTILITIES OR IF FURTHER VERIFICATION OF FACILITIES OR
TEMPORARY DISRUPTION OF SERVICE IS NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AND SHALL FULLY COORDINATE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS
WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY.
3. ANY MONUMENTATION DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT AND PROTECT ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCH EXCAVATION AND /OR PIPE INSTALLATION.
5. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE USE OF THE
CONTRACTOR IN PROVIDING PROTECTIONS FOR THE UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE TOWN OF
BOONE, DESIGN CONSULTANT, AND /OR AGENT SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
ACCURACY OR LOCATION, SIZE, DEPTH OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION. BEFORE BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT EACH OF THE UTILITY OWNERS IN THE AREA OF
CONSTRUCTION RELATIVE TO THEIR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL
UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND /OR RELATED WORK OF THE
CONTRACTOR OR HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE TOWN OF BOONE HARMLESS FOR
ANY INCONVENIENCE OR DELAY CAUSED BY THE OPERATIONS OF OTHERS PERFORMING THE ABOVE
WORK. NECESSARY ADJUSTMENT OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, EXCEPT FOR CONTRACT
ITEMS, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHERS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SATISFACTORY PROGRESS OF THE
PROJECT.
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 4O1 44-h STREET SW SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR
RECORD DWG. A. SVC
DATE ,lillil! / a
�4 8
03808,k
-6X 6tl r..
ia1
MAPPING:
EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE ACCESS ROAD AND INTAKE SITE PLAN SHEETS REPRESENTS FIELD
SURVEY COMPLETED ON 12/1 /2008 BY WK DICKSON AND AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY COLLECTED ON
11/27/2008 BY IMC. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS SUCH AS ROADS, STREAM
AND PIPE INVERTS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
SURFACE WATERS SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET HAVE BEEN FIELD LOCATED & IDENTIFIED. A JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE USACE ON NOVEMBER 21ST, 2011 FOR THE FEATURES IDENTIFIED
TO BE IMPACTED.
THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL IS BASED ON NC GRID NAD83 IN US SURVEY FEET. THIS PROJECT WAS
GROUND LOCALIZED ABOUT NCGS MONUMENT "HAMPTON ".
N = 905736.03'
E = 1211369.29'
COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.999866297
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
ALL COORDINATES ARE GROUND COORDINATES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
TEMPORARY BENCHMARKS SHOWN ON ACCESS ROAD AND INTAKE SITE PLAN SHEETS SHALL ONLY BE
USED FOR THE WORK OF DIVISION 2.
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES:
1. CONSTRUCTION OF CULVERT P -1 IS NECESSARY TO ACCESS THE REMAINDER OF THE ACCESS ROAD
SITE AS WELL AS THE INTAKE PUMP STATION.
2. DUE TO CULVERT P -1'S PROXIMITY TO CRANBERRY SPRINGS ROAD AND THE .STEEP DROP IN GRADE
FROM THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO CLOSE HALF OF
CRANBERRY SPRINGS ROAD FOR TEMPORARY STAGING PURPOSES. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS
WILL BE REQUIRED.
3. ONCE CONSTRUCTION OF CULVERT P -1 IS COMPLETE, THE STAGING AREA CAN BE REMOVED.
4. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE
MUTCD OR NCDOT REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
THE FOLLOWING SEQUENECE DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL ACTIONS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR, ONLY A
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT SEQUENCE.
1. OBTAIN ALL APPROVALS NECESSARY TO BEGIN AND COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
2. CONDUCT PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING INCLUDING OWNER, ENGINEER, ASSOCIATED CONTRACTORS
AND OTHER AFFECTED PARTIES.
3. FLAG THE WORK LIMITS, AND BUFFER AREAS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR PROTECTION. CLEAR AND
GRUB ONLY AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF P -1 CULVERT AT MEADOW CREEK.
4. GRADE IN FILL ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF CULVERT P -1 AT MEADOW CREEK AS NECESSARY FOR
PLACEMENT OF BOX CULVERTS.
5. ONCE CULVERT P -1 AND WINGWALLS ARE IN PLACE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE FILL DOWN TO
EXISTING GRADE ON SOUTHWESTERN SIDE OF P -1 CULVERT FOR CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS.
6. INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCES AND ALL OTHER PHASE I EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES AS SHOWN ON SHEETS G2.8, G2.9, & G2.10 SHALL BE INSTALLED.
7. THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ADJUST AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY.
STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS USING TEMPORARY SEEDING MEASURES IN LOCATIONS AS NECESSARY.
EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED PER GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON SHEET G0.5.
8. ONCE PHASE I E/S CONTROLS ARE IN PLACE, CLEAR AND GRUB AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF ALL PROPOSED CONDITIONS.
9. AS GRADING OF THE SITE PROGRESSES AND ROADSIDE DITCHES ARE CONSTRUCTED, INSTALL PHASE
II CONTROLS. SEE SHEETS G2.11, G2.12, & G2.13.
10. INSTALLATION OF WATERLINE SHALL BE COMPLETED PER DIVISION 3 PLAN SHEETS. POWER UTILITIES
(NOT SHOWN IN PLAN) SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE POWER COMPANY.
11. CONSTRUCT FILL ALONG PROPOSED ROAD PER FILL EMBANKMENT SPECIFICATION.
12. PERFORM FINAL GRADING AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL ROAD PER DETAIL 2/G2.15.
13. CONSTRUCT RAW WATER INTAKE SITE AS SHOWN IN THE DIVISION 2 PLAN SHEETS, INCLUDING
GRADING, RAW WATER INTAKE BUILDING, INTAKE GALLERY, AND GRAVEL DRIVEWAY AREA.
14. ESTABLISH FINAL VEGETATION.
15. WITH APPROVAL OF E/S INSPECTOR, REMOVE ALL E/S CONTROLS.
USDA- RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEGEND
PROPOSED GRADING
2411.51
SPOT SHOT
REVISED IMPACT TABLES FOR 401/404 RESUBMISSION
3 -18 -15
0P)
HIGH POINT IN GRADE
(HP)
ADDED IMPACT TABLES
11 -7 -12
REV. N0.
1 DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED PLANS CONTAINED WITHIN THE G2 SERIES SHEETS CONSIST OF THE
ACCESS ROAD TO THE RAW WATER INTAKE BUILDING AND SITE PLAN WORK FOR THE RAW WATER INTAKE
BUILDING. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CULVERT CROSSINGS PROPOSED THAT RUN UNDERNEATH THE PROPOSED
ACCESS ROAD. THIS SECTION OF THE PROJECT PLANS ALSO INCLUDES TWO STAGES OF EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROLS THAT APPLY TO THE ACCESS ROAD AND RAW WATER INTAKE SITES. THE PROJECT
IS LOCATED WITHIN THE 100 -YEAR FEMA FLOODPLAIN OF THE SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON SHEETS G2.8 THROUGH
G2.10 BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. SEE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE (THIS SHEET) FOR MORE
INFORMATION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCESS THE PROJECT SITE THROUGH CRANBERRY SRPINGS ROAD AT THE
PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD ENTRANCE. CONSTRUCTION OF CULVERT P-1 IS NECESSARY TO BEGIN
CONSTRUCTION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CAUTION WHILE CROSSING AT MEADOW CREEK SO AS NOT TO DISTURB THE
EXISTING STREAM ANY MORE THAN IS NECESSARY.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL MATERIAL REMOVED OFFSITE IN SAFE AND LEGAL MANNER.
5. ALL DE- WATERING REQUIRED TO EXECUTE WORK SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS 2 & 3, SHEET GO.7.
6. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE INSIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE THROUGHOUT
CONSTRUCTION.
7. WHERE PRACTICABLE, HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE OPERATED FROM THE STREAM OR WETLAND
BANKS IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENTATION. WHERE THIS IN NOT POSSIBLE, ONLY
WELL- MAINTAINED, CLEAN EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE USED INSIDE STREAMS & WETLANDS. SPILL
CONTAINMENT EQUIPMENT /MATERIALS SHOULD BE READILY AVAILABLE ON SITE FOR THE DURATION
OF THE PROJECT.
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE & GRADING NOTES:
1. PIPE INVERT ELEVATIONS HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SLOPES. HOWEVER, SLOPES SHALL NOT BE
DECREASED FROM THOSE SHOWN ON PLAN WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER.
2. POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL GRADED AREAS.
3. ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS NOTED ON THE PLAN. PIPE LENGTHS
INDICATED ON PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.
4. NO SOIL DISTURBANCE OR COMPACTION, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, TRAFFIC, TRENCHING, OR OTHER
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY SHALL BE PERMITTED BEYOND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WITHOUT PRIOR
APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN
ACTUAL CONDITION AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FOR INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING.
6. EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AT 1' INTERVALS.
7. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ARE FINISHED GRADES.
8. ALL PIPES, FITTINGS & STRUCTURES SHALL BE PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
9. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DESCRIPTION OF SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL AND COMPACTION
REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUITABLE MATERIAL AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE FINAL
PROJECT GRADES.
10. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHOWN IN PLANS IS CONSIDERED TO BE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
CONTRACTOR TO REMAIN WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AT ALL TIMES. ANY DAMAGE TO
ADJACENT PROPERTY CAUSED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR
OR REPLACE TO ORIGINAL OR SUPERIOR CONDITION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR ANY REGULATORY RESTITUTION CAUSED BY NOT REMAINING WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
11. CONTRACTOR MUST ESTABLISH GROUNDCOVER ON EXPOSED SLOPES PER THE "GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE" ON SHEET GO.5.
12. SIDE SLOPES IN GRADED AREAS & GRASS SWALES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 3:1 UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE.
13. VEGETATED BUFFERS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES &
SURFACE WATER ASSOCIATED WITH THE ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE. BUFFERS SHALL BE
MAINTAINED AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
14. WETLANDS & STREAMS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE ACCESS ROAD
& INTAKE SITE PROJECT. SEE THE ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE DATA TABLE LOCATED ON THIS
SHEET FOR THESE QUANTITIES, AND SHEETS G2.5, G2.6, & G2.7 FOR THE WETLAND & STREAM
IMPACT LOCATIONS.
15. THE SITEWORK IS LOCATED WITHIN THE 100 -YEAR FEMA FLOODPLAIN OF SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER.
SEE SHEET G2.1 FOR LOCATION OF 100 -YEAR AND 500 -YEAR FEMA FLOODPLAIN LINES.
EROSION CONTROL:
1. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: f 8.20 AC. (FOR ACCESS ROAD AND RAW WATER INTAKE SITE ONLY)
2. MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N.C.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT AREAS.
CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE AN APPROVED COPY OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT ON
SITE AT ALL TIMES.
4. SEE EROSION CONTROL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
5. DE- WATERING OF THE WORK AREAS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION
IN ORDER TO KEEP THE WORK AREA DRY.
6. STAGING AREAS AND MATERIAL STOCKPILES FOR THIS PROJECT ARE TO BE LOCATED TO PREVENT
SOIL AND SEDIMENT LOSS. STOCKPILES OF FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE ENCOMPASSED BY SILT FENCE
EXCEPT FOR THE POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE STOCKPILE AREA. STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS
MUST BE LOCATED OUTSIDE FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOODWAY.
UTILITY COORDINATION:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT NC ONE -CALL AT 1- 800 -632 -4949 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UTILITIES OR IF FURTHER VERIFICATION OF FACILITIES OR
TEMPORARY DISRUPTION OF SERVICE IS NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AND SHALL FULLY COORDINATE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS
WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY.
3. ANY MONUMENTATION DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT AND PROTECT ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCH EXCAVATION AND /OR PIPE INSTALLATION.
5. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE USE OF THE
CONTRACTOR IN PROVIDING PROTECTIONS FOR THE UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE TOWN OF
BOONE, DESIGN CONSULTANT, AND /OR AGENT SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
ACCURACY OR LOCATION, SIZE, DEPTH OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION. BEFORE BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT EACH OF THE UTILITY OWNERS IN THE AREA OF
CONSTRUCTION RELATIVE TO THEIR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL
UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND /OR RELATED WORK OF THE
CONTRACTOR OR HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE TOWN OF BOONE HARMLESS FOR
ANY INCONVENIENCE OR DELAY CAUSED BY THE OPERATIONS OF OTHERS PERFORMING THE ABOVE
WORK. NECESSARY ADJUSTMENT OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, EXCEPT FOR CONTRACT
ITEMS, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHERS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SATISFACTORY PROGRESS OF THE
PROJECT.
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 4O1 44-h STREET SW SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR
RECORD DWG. A. SVC
DATE ,lillil! / a
�4 8
03808,k
-6X 6tl r..
ia1
MAPPING:
EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE ACCESS ROAD AND INTAKE SITE PLAN SHEETS REPRESENTS FIELD
SURVEY COMPLETED ON 12/1 /2008 BY WK DICKSON AND AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY COLLECTED ON
11/27/2008 BY IMC. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS SUCH AS ROADS, STREAM
AND PIPE INVERTS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
SURFACE WATERS SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET HAVE BEEN FIELD LOCATED & IDENTIFIED. A JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE USACE ON NOVEMBER 21ST, 2011 FOR THE FEATURES IDENTIFIED
TO BE IMPACTED.
THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL IS BASED ON NC GRID NAD83 IN US SURVEY FEET. THIS PROJECT WAS
GROUND LOCALIZED ABOUT NCGS MONUMENT "HAMPTON ".
N = 905736.03'
E = 1211369.29'
COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.999866297
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
ALL COORDINATES ARE GROUND COORDINATES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
TEMPORARY BENCHMARKS SHOWN ON ACCESS ROAD AND INTAKE SITE PLAN SHEETS SHALL ONLY BE
USED FOR THE WORK OF DIVISION 2.
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES:
1. CONSTRUCTION OF CULVERT P -1 IS NECESSARY TO ACCESS THE REMAINDER OF THE ACCESS ROAD
SITE AS WELL AS THE INTAKE PUMP STATION.
2. DUE TO CULVERT P -1'S PROXIMITY TO CRANBERRY SPRINGS ROAD AND THE .STEEP DROP IN GRADE
FROM THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO CLOSE HALF OF
CRANBERRY SPRINGS ROAD FOR TEMPORARY STAGING PURPOSES. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS
WILL BE REQUIRED.
3. ONCE CONSTRUCTION OF CULVERT P -1 IS COMPLETE, THE STAGING AREA CAN BE REMOVED.
4. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE
MUTCD OR NCDOT REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
THE FOLLOWING SEQUENECE DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL ACTIONS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR, ONLY A
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT SEQUENCE.
1. OBTAIN ALL APPROVALS NECESSARY TO BEGIN AND COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
2. CONDUCT PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING INCLUDING OWNER, ENGINEER, ASSOCIATED CONTRACTORS
AND OTHER AFFECTED PARTIES.
3. FLAG THE WORK LIMITS, AND BUFFER AREAS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR PROTECTION. CLEAR AND
GRUB ONLY AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF P -1 CULVERT AT MEADOW CREEK.
4. GRADE IN FILL ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF CULVERT P -1 AT MEADOW CREEK AS NECESSARY FOR
PLACEMENT OF BOX CULVERTS.
5. ONCE CULVERT P -1 AND WINGWALLS ARE IN PLACE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE FILL DOWN TO
EXISTING GRADE ON SOUTHWESTERN SIDE OF P -1 CULVERT FOR CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS.
6. INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCES AND ALL OTHER PHASE I EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES AS SHOWN ON SHEETS G2.8, G2.9, & G2.10 SHALL BE INSTALLED.
7. THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ADJUST AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY.
STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS USING TEMPORARY SEEDING MEASURES IN LOCATIONS AS NECESSARY.
EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED PER GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON SHEET G0.5.
8. ONCE PHASE I E/S CONTROLS ARE IN PLACE, CLEAR AND GRUB AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF ALL PROPOSED CONDITIONS.
9. AS GRADING OF THE SITE PROGRESSES AND ROADSIDE DITCHES ARE CONSTRUCTED, INSTALL PHASE
II CONTROLS. SEE SHEETS G2.11, G2.12, & G2.13.
10. INSTALLATION OF WATERLINE SHALL BE COMPLETED PER DIVISION 3 PLAN SHEETS. POWER UTILITIES
(NOT SHOWN IN PLAN) SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE POWER COMPANY.
11. CONSTRUCT FILL ALONG PROPOSED ROAD PER FILL EMBANKMENT SPECIFICATION.
12. PERFORM FINAL GRADING AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL ROAD PER DETAIL 2/G2.15.
13. CONSTRUCT RAW WATER INTAKE SITE AS SHOWN IN THE DIVISION 2 PLAN SHEETS, INCLUDING
GRADING, RAW WATER INTAKE BUILDING, INTAKE GALLERY, AND GRAVEL DRIVEWAY AREA.
14. ESTABLISH FINAL VEGETATION.
15. WITH APPROVAL OF E/S INSPECTOR, REMOVE ALL E/S CONTROLS.
USDA- RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEGEND
PROPOSED GRADING
2411.51
SPOT SHOT
LOW POINT IN GRADE
0P)
HIGH POINT IN GRADE
(HP)
PROPOSED CONTOURS
2910 2911
- -- -----
EXISTING CONTOURS
_ - 2910 - --
PROPOSED STORM
-6X 6tl r..
ia1
MAPPING:
EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE ACCESS ROAD AND INTAKE SITE PLAN SHEETS REPRESENTS FIELD
SURVEY COMPLETED ON 12/1 /2008 BY WK DICKSON AND AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY COLLECTED ON
11/27/2008 BY IMC. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS SUCH AS ROADS, STREAM
AND PIPE INVERTS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
SURFACE WATERS SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET HAVE BEEN FIELD LOCATED & IDENTIFIED. A JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE USACE ON NOVEMBER 21ST, 2011 FOR THE FEATURES IDENTIFIED
TO BE IMPACTED.
THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL IS BASED ON NC GRID NAD83 IN US SURVEY FEET. THIS PROJECT WAS
GROUND LOCALIZED ABOUT NCGS MONUMENT "HAMPTON ".
N = 905736.03'
E = 1211369.29'
COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.999866297
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
ALL COORDINATES ARE GROUND COORDINATES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
TEMPORARY BENCHMARKS SHOWN ON ACCESS ROAD AND INTAKE SITE PLAN SHEETS SHALL ONLY BE
USED FOR THE WORK OF DIVISION 2.
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES:
1. CONSTRUCTION OF CULVERT P -1 IS NECESSARY TO ACCESS THE REMAINDER OF THE ACCESS ROAD
SITE AS WELL AS THE INTAKE PUMP STATION.
2. DUE TO CULVERT P -1'S PROXIMITY TO CRANBERRY SPRINGS ROAD AND THE .STEEP DROP IN GRADE
FROM THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO CLOSE HALF OF
CRANBERRY SPRINGS ROAD FOR TEMPORARY STAGING PURPOSES. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS
WILL BE REQUIRED.
3. ONCE CONSTRUCTION OF CULVERT P -1 IS COMPLETE, THE STAGING AREA CAN BE REMOVED.
4. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE
MUTCD OR NCDOT REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
THE FOLLOWING SEQUENECE DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL ACTIONS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR, ONLY A
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT SEQUENCE.
1. OBTAIN ALL APPROVALS NECESSARY TO BEGIN AND COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
2. CONDUCT PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING INCLUDING OWNER, ENGINEER, ASSOCIATED CONTRACTORS
AND OTHER AFFECTED PARTIES.
3. FLAG THE WORK LIMITS, AND BUFFER AREAS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR PROTECTION. CLEAR AND
GRUB ONLY AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF P -1 CULVERT AT MEADOW CREEK.
4. GRADE IN FILL ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF CULVERT P -1 AT MEADOW CREEK AS NECESSARY FOR
PLACEMENT OF BOX CULVERTS.
5. ONCE CULVERT P -1 AND WINGWALLS ARE IN PLACE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE FILL DOWN TO
EXISTING GRADE ON SOUTHWESTERN SIDE OF P -1 CULVERT FOR CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS.
6. INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCES AND ALL OTHER PHASE I EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES AS SHOWN ON SHEETS G2.8, G2.9, & G2.10 SHALL BE INSTALLED.
7. THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ADJUST AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY.
STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS USING TEMPORARY SEEDING MEASURES IN LOCATIONS AS NECESSARY.
EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED PER GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON SHEET G0.5.
8. ONCE PHASE I E/S CONTROLS ARE IN PLACE, CLEAR AND GRUB AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF ALL PROPOSED CONDITIONS.
9. AS GRADING OF THE SITE PROGRESSES AND ROADSIDE DITCHES ARE CONSTRUCTED, INSTALL PHASE
II CONTROLS. SEE SHEETS G2.11, G2.12, & G2.13.
10. INSTALLATION OF WATERLINE SHALL BE COMPLETED PER DIVISION 3 PLAN SHEETS. POWER UTILITIES
(NOT SHOWN IN PLAN) SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE POWER COMPANY.
11. CONSTRUCT FILL ALONG PROPOSED ROAD PER FILL EMBANKMENT SPECIFICATION.
12. PERFORM FINAL GRADING AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL ROAD PER DETAIL 2/G2.15.
13. CONSTRUCT RAW WATER INTAKE SITE AS SHOWN IN THE DIVISION 2 PLAN SHEETS, INCLUDING
GRADING, RAW WATER INTAKE BUILDING, INTAKE GALLERY, AND GRAVEL DRIVEWAY AREA.
14. ESTABLISH FINAL VEGETATION.
15. WITH APPROVAL OF E/S INSPECTOR, REMOVE ALL E/S CONTROLS.
USDA- RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEGEND
PROPOSED GRADING
2411.51
SPOT SHOT
LOW POINT IN GRADE
0P)
HIGH POINT IN GRADE
(HP)
PROPOSED CONTOURS
2910 2911
- -- -----
EXISTING CONTOURS
_ - 2910 - --
PROPOSED STORM
SEWER /CULVERT
PROPOSED GRAVEL
DRIVE
; rr
POINT. OF TANGENCY
ALONG PROPOSED ROAD
CENTERLINE
PROPERTY CORNER
Q
IRON ROD
O
PROPOSED RIGHT OF
WAY EASEMENT
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
­­iLOD�
STORM DRAINAGE
SDE
EASEMENT
PROPOSED CENTERLINE
OF DITCH
PROPOSED WATERLINE
(SEE DIVISION 4 SHEETS)
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC LINE (CONTRACTOR
UE UE
SHALL ARRANGE & COORDINATE
WITH POWER COMPANY)
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
e
EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT OF
R/ W
WAY LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD WIRES
OW
EXISTING FENCELINE
_X _X
EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS
T _
LINE
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
- -
EXISTING TREELINE
EXISTING WETLANDS
w y
EXISTING WETLANDS,
W W W d W v W v
PERMANENT IMPACTS
W W W V W W W W
EXISTING WETLANDS,
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
;
Q
U
EXISTING STREAM,
PERMANENT IMPACTS
U
EXISTING STREAM,
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
SILT FENCE,
U
SEE DETAIL 2/GO.6
Z
U
U
ROCK INLET CONTROL,
SEE DETAIL 3/GO.5
0
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE,
SEE DETAIL 1 /GO.5
0
W
FIBER CHECK DAM,
U
SEE DETAIL 5/GO.5
W
SILT FENCE OUTFALL,
SEE DETAIL 4/GO.5
ROCK CHECK DAM,
SEE DETAIL 5/G2.15
U
ACCESS ROAD 8c INTAKE SITE
GENERAL NOTES
nG2.
z
W
U
LL

� J
z
� Y �
O � 0
0
Foz
zF a
F-w�
ooh
w U 0
= z Y
w �
wW¢
o�M
w3
s W
�o�
H U
o §o
2rto
o <h
0zo
a -JUi
U�Qw
oza
w C�0
QJ[U
j0Ow
w�w�
wZ ~~
rW�Q
=�w>
C7 D0Ld
K U w M
-j JpU aO p
J F
Q N U
Cull
zppo
U)
o0oz
U zz w OU
�Wmw
z J 2 -
O w O J
Y Q
0p��
^J
YOU w
3 P7
0 0
°aoa
F -r=d3w
�gOj
¢
d U Y Z
oo2<?
00 n
BONNIE JEAN BROWN
DB. 395 PG: 315
PIN. 2942-66-5677-000
BETTY E WATSON
DB, 1043 PG 111 5 8 IRON ROD FOUND
PIN: 2942 -76- -9503 -000
® A� 01' SOUTH WEST OF LINE
i 0.
BONNIE JEAN BROWN
DB: 395 PG. • 315
W sss, PIN: 2942 -66 -5677 -000
O N
U)
\tom
W �
NJ W�
MATCHLINE - THIS SHEET
MATCHLINE - SEE INSET, THIS SHEET BONNIE JEAN BROWN
DB. 395 PG: 315
N88 03'34 "W PIN: 2942 -66- 5677 -000
REFERENCE POINT
1408.96' - - - -
_ N88 03'34 "W 1" IRON PIPE FOUND
15" HEMLOCK 1408.96' - - - - - _ N88 03 34 "W
W REFERENCE POINT _. 1408.96 _ — — 1/2" IRON ROD S 2121'17" W 1.21'
» TO 22" BLACKGUM TREE
_ 112" IRON R00 FOUND — N88 03 34 W
N 823'00" W 1.45' 114.81' 22" BLACKGUM TREE
N TO 15" HEMLOCK 7REE
O
M
O
Z
FRANKLIN L. TLIGMAN
and Wife
RONALD SIDNEY COOPER and DONALD L COOPER MARTHA V. i. 534
DB: 1288 PG. 634 i3B; 2- PG 26
PIN: 2942- 38•°°°2726°-° 000
PIN: 2942 -87 -1802 -000 ^ 112" IRON PIPE FOUND
REFERENCE POINT
eN N 13 48'29" W 3.59'
22" WH17E OAK 7REE TO 22" WHITE OAK 7REE
--- -�
SPE'ClAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREA
SEE DIVISION 4
SHEETS FOR
PROPOSED i/2 ©IRON \
WATERLINE TAE LINE ONLY ROD FOUND
N3812 ' 40 E - -DISTURBED
( 26.47'
RONALD SIDNEY COOPER and
DONALD L COOPER \,
DB,° 1288 PG. 634
PIN: 2942 -87- 1802 -000 \ /Dvo Q5�
/2a/',1ON Ro� 0.
F�l/ND
STA 0 +00 —
BEGIN ACCESS
ROAD
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
1 l \
7-,
o PERI MORE T2
ERN 'ST. MORE7Z
D.B. 443 PG 292
2942 -47 -2586 -000
LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER, tis�
and AMY COOPER GREEK
REMAINING PORTION OF o
¢ DB: 1122 PG 238
Q) \
1/2" IRON ROD FOUND I PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -000 v \
LOT 2
48" MAPLE TREE
REMAINING AREA
81.12 ACRE$ f N I REFERENCE POINT
1 " IRON PIPE FOUND
N 44'43'14' E 232'
tv TO 48" MAPLE TREE
0
y
�— Z
r PUMP STATION SITE v
BOUNDARY LINE
w
N 500 YEAR FEMA
/�\..: TOWN OF BOONS
FLOODPLAIN �� ��'� -_ . DB. 1425 PG 405 w
.�- A PORTION OF o rn
x ".
PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -0000
D AREA 1/
BENCHMARK. LOT 1
60d NAIL IN BASE a35 s9s qn Fr
DAR—r8
O
Dos" i
0
°�
- -. APPROXIMATE CENTER
RIVER "
_ SOU 13510 CLASS C HQ
SR
\ WATAUGA COUNTY
\ - _---. ASHE COUNTY
qtE
CENTER
OXIM RIVER
® APPR FORK NEW C NQW
S R 351. CLqS$
0167
NCGS MONUMENT
"BROWNWOOD"
N 929164.60 (GROUND)
E 1247819.19 (GROUND)
� a \ Mp,
DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
RWH
DRAWN BY
1" =100'
PROJECT DATE
CC,
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
rn�
\
MARCH 2015
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
0 5 6g
APPROVED BY
PROJECT NUMBER
y�'
ttl
/2a/',1ON Ro� 0.
F�l/ND
STA 0 +00 —
BEGIN ACCESS
ROAD
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
1 l \
7-,
o PERI MORE T2
ERN 'ST. MORE7Z
D.B. 443 PG 292
2942 -47 -2586 -000
LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER, tis�
and AMY COOPER GREEK
REMAINING PORTION OF o
¢ DB: 1122 PG 238
Q) \
1/2" IRON ROD FOUND I PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -000 v \
LOT 2
48" MAPLE TREE
REMAINING AREA
81.12 ACRE$ f N I REFERENCE POINT
1 " IRON PIPE FOUND
N 44'43'14' E 232'
tv TO 48" MAPLE TREE
0
y
�— Z
r PUMP STATION SITE v
BOUNDARY LINE
w
N 500 YEAR FEMA
/�\..: TOWN OF BOONS
FLOODPLAIN �� ��'� -_ . DB. 1425 PG 405 w
.�- A PORTION OF o rn
x ".
PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -0000
D AREA 1/
BENCHMARK. LOT 1
60d NAIL IN BASE a35 s9s qn Fr
DAR—r8
O
Dos" i
0
°�
- -. APPROXIMATE CENTER
RIVER "
_ SOU 13510 CLASS C HQ
SR
\ WATAUGA COUNTY
\ - _---. ASHE COUNTY
qtE
CENTER
OXIM RIVER
® APPR FORK NEW C NQW
S R 351. CLqS$
0167
NCGS MONUMENT
"BROWNWOOD"
N 929164.60 (GROUND)
E 1247819.19 (GROUND)
DATE
038086:w
A. 619
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONS
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
3, 1 1 3 '-'
' 2
,m �O N11' 10
PROPOSED
INTAKE °
STATION SITE
vo°
o o/
✓mo,/ 1—
SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER O
SR 1351, CLASS IV HQW
APPROX. LOCATION
OF RIVER TRANSITION
FROM CLASS IV TO
CLASS C O
LL-
E:)
N Q
W
W
O
W
GRAPHIC SCALE Q
100' 50' 0' 50' 100' 200'
LL-
1 _ 100'
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
OVERALL PLAN
G2.1
2.17
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
RWH
DRAWN BY
1" =100'
PROJECT DATE
WK
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB
MARCH 2015
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
BIDDING
APPROVED BY
PROJECT NUMBER
DICKUSON
Office Locations:
JPK
FILE NAME
80376.00.1-11
community infrastructure consultants
North Carolina Georgia
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
80376AR_OVERALL.DWG
South Carolina
DATE
038086:w
A. 619
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONS
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
3, 1 1 3 '-'
' 2
,m �O N11' 10
PROPOSED
INTAKE °
STATION SITE
vo°
o o/
✓mo,/ 1—
SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER O
SR 1351, CLASS IV HQW
APPROX. LOCATION
OF RIVER TRANSITION
FROM CLASS IV TO
CLASS C O
LL-
E:)
N Q
W
W
O
W
GRAPHIC SCALE Q
100' 50' 0' 50' 100' 200'
LL-
1 _ 100'
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
OVERALL PLAN
G2.1
2.17

N J
2 Q
Z
Y 0
o
F-
Q
WW=
ooh
W U Uj Uj
= Z Y
W af
W h Q
w��
V)
Z) sW
ch,o?�
�C
C)
ago
� F-
<_
00-
oW
of zo
a. W , N
�QW
L
0Z(L
w20
O J U
> O w
w�W�
Of
wZ�~
��.
� i-'
z Q
U (n W
Fy U W_0]
JOF-O
J�or
QV,U
U ~ J w
?000
oV)oz
Uo�o
�WmW
z W = m
O
O 0 J
Y� a-Q
oocnX:
V) •J
z
Y O Z w
°ao4 0
�f= W
Ego'
�v)
}
¢.UYZ
OOU0
000(n
�� �i %� /�i ' /' i % / / �P LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER,
STA 0 +00 CL ROAD J s / /.,j_ / / �P \
INTERSECTION / �y j %�ij i and AMY COOPER GREER
REMAINING PORTION OF
/1� / � � DB: 1122 PG. • 238 � 4- CULVERT P -1 (SEE i / %i� t /// i/i / \ PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -000
SHEET G2.14 FOR / / /. i� / 50 LF OF
A
\ DETAILS) / %, ii' ` O j TEMPORARY STREAM
!�' // '- �/ O N.. /, �/ O IMPACT TO MEADOW/ j LOT 2 'A01
\ 0 // /, /i 81.12 ACRES +/-
/ ' CREEK 1, IMPACT 1.613 / SEE DETAIL
2/G2.15 FOR
TYP. ROAD HBO
(55LF OF PERMANENT / / Zg20 SECTION
REAM IMPACT TO _ %p\ EADOW CREEK 1, ry
IMPACT S12 % /� %/ /� % ' !/� ' 2907.00 / > ; , !i
% / g15 LIMIT OF
DISTURBANCE
(TYPICAL) � ��•LOD�m.Lp0�
CULVERT P -2 j Q
(SEE SCHEDULE E00 �. OD
RIFFLE GRADE / �/ '�`� / / �1 y / -�
CONTROL, SEE ON THIS SHEET) o LOD 1.OD
DETAIL 1/G2.16 EOD '2 90
Q53 LF OF TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT TO
MEADOW CREEK 1,
IMPACT S13
W
RONALD SIDNEY COOPER and
DONALD L. COOPER
DB. 1288 PG: 634
PIN: 2942 -87 -1802 -000
SEE DIVISION 4
SHEETS FOR
PROPOSED
WATERLINE &
EASEMENTS-'
CULVERT P -3
I (SEE SCHEDULE
ON THIS SHEET)
904.58
LO LOD -
_._ -
0
/
w w PO 5
SF O
17TEMRARY WE TLA 42 SF OF
_ ImrAu T TO WETLAND PERMANENT WETLAND
L WA, IMPACT W6 IMPACT TO WETLAND
0 WA, IMPACT W5
I
00
_
?
SEE DETAIL 2/G2.16 / I I
SEE DETAIL
j \w\ \� 51.4 GETA BUFFER 3/G2.16 FOR FOR DITCH SLOPES / Q E DETAIL V
Q
(:)j \ DIMENSIONS (TYP.) /G2.16 FOR
RIP -RAP RIP -RAP w
/ GJ \ \�\ 180 SF OF DIMENSIONS DIMENSIONS
I;
' �P ` , \� \ TEMPORARY WETLAND BENCHMARK 60d NAIL wl ( !0
60167 IN BASE OF UTILITY O
NCGS MONUMENT \� �\ \ IMPACT TO WETLAND / y
U "BROWNWQOD" LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER, `w \ \w WA, IMPACT W7
\
POLE, ELEV.= 2909.39
and AMY COOPER GREEK
/ N 929164.60 (GROUND)
REMAINING PORTION OF \\ \
E 1247819.19 (GROUND) �
\ ��
DB: 1122 PG: 238 \ \ \ \ \ .. ...
/ PIN. 2942 -68 -6039 -000 �� ,4'\ o '
\ \w ;
/ LOT 2 WETLANDS i
/ 81.12 ACRES l /- �� (TYP.)
1. ; - •
PIPE ID
MATERIAL
DIA.
INVERT UP
INVERT DN
LENGTHS
R
DRAWN BY
ENTRANCE /EXIT TYPE
P -1
RCBC
SEE DETAILS ON SHEET G2.14
P -2
RCP
24"
2905.15
2904.58
68.92'
0.83%
FLARED END SECTIONS
P -3
RCP
48"
2905.00
2904.67
69.60'
0.47%
PRE -CAST ENDWALL, SEE DETAIL 3/GO.6
NOTE: SEE DETAIL 1/G2.15 FOR TRENCHING DETAIL.
EX, '
2906.00
/ 290 ;00 / `
/6 32.3' VEGETATED BUFFER /
F < WETLANDS
i (TYP:)
909.t�
is I - I •` ;� - Tc`. �� \.
O L
GZ
O i �
MPS
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
O
N
W
W
to
W
O
O
O
F-
W
Z
J
2
U
Q
�. ■ ■r Z
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1 = 40' HORIZONTAL
GRAPHIC SCALE
5' 2.5' 0' 2.5' 5' 10'
1" = 5' VERTICAL
NOTE:
1. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE
MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN PLACE AS SHOWN ON
SHEETS G2.11 THROUGH G2.13 UNTIL ALL
DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND
FINAL APPROVAL FROM NCDENR LAND QUALITY
SECTION IS PROVIDED.
2. CONTRACTOR MUST IDENTIFY SOURCE OF FILL
MATERIAL PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
TEST RESULTS SHOWING PROPOSED FILL MATERIALS
MEET PROJECT SPECIFICATION MUST BE PROVIDED
AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO DELIVERY.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE
REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL PERMITS FOR ANY
OFFSITE WASTE OR BORROW SITES USED FOR THIS
PROJECT. CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT COPIES OF
THE EROSION CONTROL PERMITS TO THE OWNER TO
THE NCDENR- LAND QUALITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
STA. 0 +00 TO 9 +00
I G2.
O
f-
U
C,n
Z
0
U
O
LL_
LEI
Q
L�l
W
f
0
CD
U
L1J
D
Q
L�
2.171
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
RELEASED FOR
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
R
DRAWN BY
A SHOWN
PROJECT DATE
WK
PPR
APPROVED BY
REVISED IMPACT NOTES FOR 401/404 RESUBMISSION
3 -18 -15
JPK
80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
STREAM AND IMPACT NOTES GIVEN SPECIFIC LABELS
11 -7 -12
REV. NO.1
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
O
N
W
W
to
W
O
O
O
F-
W
Z
J
2
U
Q
�. ■ ■r Z
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1 = 40' HORIZONTAL
GRAPHIC SCALE
5' 2.5' 0' 2.5' 5' 10'
1" = 5' VERTICAL
NOTE:
1. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE
MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN PLACE AS SHOWN ON
SHEETS G2.11 THROUGH G2.13 UNTIL ALL
DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND
FINAL APPROVAL FROM NCDENR LAND QUALITY
SECTION IS PROVIDED.
2. CONTRACTOR MUST IDENTIFY SOURCE OF FILL
MATERIAL PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
TEST RESULTS SHOWING PROPOSED FILL MATERIALS
MEET PROJECT SPECIFICATION MUST BE PROVIDED
AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO DELIVERY.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE
REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL PERMITS FOR ANY
OFFSITE WASTE OR BORROW SITES USED FOR THIS
PROJECT. CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT COPIES OF
THE EROSION CONTROL PERMITS TO THE OWNER TO
THE NCDENR- LAND QUALITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
STA. 0 +00 TO 9 +00
I G2.
O
f-
U
C,n
Z
0
U
O
LL_
LEI
Q
L�l
W
f
0
CD
U
L1J
D
Q
L�
2.171
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
RELEASED FOR
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
R
DRAWN BY
A SHOWN
PROJECT DATE
WK
PPR
APPROVED BY
MARCH 2MBE
PROJECT NUMBER
D I �SO O
JPK
80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
community infrastructure consultants
80376AR_PROPOSED.DWG
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
O
N
W
W
to
W
O
O
O
F-
W
Z
J
2
U
Q
�. ■ ■r Z
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1 = 40' HORIZONTAL
GRAPHIC SCALE
5' 2.5' 0' 2.5' 5' 10'
1" = 5' VERTICAL
NOTE:
1. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE
MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN PLACE AS SHOWN ON
SHEETS G2.11 THROUGH G2.13 UNTIL ALL
DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND
FINAL APPROVAL FROM NCDENR LAND QUALITY
SECTION IS PROVIDED.
2. CONTRACTOR MUST IDENTIFY SOURCE OF FILL
MATERIAL PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
TEST RESULTS SHOWING PROPOSED FILL MATERIALS
MEET PROJECT SPECIFICATION MUST BE PROVIDED
AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO DELIVERY.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE
REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL PERMITS FOR ANY
OFFSITE WASTE OR BORROW SITES USED FOR THIS
PROJECT. CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT COPIES OF
THE EROSION CONTROL PERMITS TO THE OWNER TO
THE NCDENR- LAND QUALITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
STA. 0 +00 TO 9 +00
I G2.
O
f-
U
C,n
Z
0
U
O
LL_
LEI
Q
L�l
W
f
0
CD
U
L1J
D
Q
L�
2.171
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
BIDDING
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
O
N
W
W
to
W
O
O
O
F-
W
Z
J
2
U
Q
�. ■ ■r Z
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1 = 40' HORIZONTAL
GRAPHIC SCALE
5' 2.5' 0' 2.5' 5' 10'
1" = 5' VERTICAL
NOTE:
1. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE
MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN PLACE AS SHOWN ON
SHEETS G2.11 THROUGH G2.13 UNTIL ALL
DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND
FINAL APPROVAL FROM NCDENR LAND QUALITY
SECTION IS PROVIDED.
2. CONTRACTOR MUST IDENTIFY SOURCE OF FILL
MATERIAL PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
TEST RESULTS SHOWING PROPOSED FILL MATERIALS
MEET PROJECT SPECIFICATION MUST BE PROVIDED
AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO DELIVERY.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE
REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL PERMITS FOR ANY
OFFSITE WASTE OR BORROW SITES USED FOR THIS
PROJECT. CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT COPIES OF
THE EROSION CONTROL PERMITS TO THE OWNER TO
THE NCDENR- LAND QUALITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
STA. 0 +00 TO 9 +00
I G2.
O
f-
U
C,n
Z
0
U
O
LL_
LEI
Q
L�l
W
f
0
CD
U
L1J
D
Q
L�
2.171

U J
2 Q
Z
Y 0
0��
w0
F-
Z-Q
W W
oz3
00
W
00 Lu
Z Y
W �
w�Q
o -�
N �
w
0m,
O � 0
oa
O W W
xzo
D_
of0J
Qw
ozn.
w 0
p
J U
�
j °ow
W Z ~ F-
� �o
V) 0-
Z Q
V)
of U W m
Moo
Q U U ~
U ~ J p
?000
N
ozo0
O F- U
�WmW
Zw =m
�0
pd'J
Y Q
UOUI=
o �
z -J
Y � U W
,o .p
p
QQOZ
Q
_~ �
Z c� z
w �
0 Fm
rC)
cn a
U
0 Y Z
U ca
0--
UppUl
a w w
'�, \�`
LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER, pRO� w -
w w w _-
w and AMY COOPER GREER ........ - - --
RT
a REMAINING PORTION OF w w w
DB. 1122 PG. 238
- ` -"
/ -
P N. 2942 68 6039 000 � � _
LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER, ...._ _
�.. w
SEE DETAIL 2/G2.16
and AMY COOPER GREER __- \ `\\ _
y / LOT 2 \ : ^ ' ti R _. ._....._.. & _.._ .........
i
`, ; + .: y' J EMAINING PORTION OF - _ - z
81.12 ACRES + - ; \ `, ; \ - PROP. 38 " D MENSIONS (TYP.) \ t \.
y1/, , \ w , w .. `..w ,% 1 \., \ \ _.. .. ....._ ._
1 \ \ s ,: - \� WATERLINE, - ' - - - _._
!, PIN:��942268 6039 -000 _ _...._.._ _ _ _....._ _.. _ LIMIT OF
/ SEE DIVISION 4 DISTURBANCE
SIO '
iY .
,
' SHEETS
\ \ \ t\
/ LOT 2
i 81.12 _ -
1 WETLANDS - - -' .__ _._ �� -:\ _. �.. ,. ..._ .____ , �. ,� ...._ . .._ ...._ , == ; - ", ACRES + - -
'- y
--
\\
373 F OF � .. ___ ..__ ' _. � .... \. \ -�'' .. - - . ' ,- = � .. __ ... - __. - -29 _ __ _._. ' - - - - _ . -
S \\ -\ _.. _ - WETLANDS - -- - ..._ - - _ - -
TEMPORARY WETLAND _.. - - _ _ _...._ .._ _ .. _ - ._..... .._......._ _
N
2 \ ,
y, \ - - - _.
IMPACT TO WETLAND , .___ __ -��.. •_„ _ ".. � -` - '� ,- .� w....__ :� -... .� ..
�% -yl` Vr .y w y Ji
;< ,. ,,w . \\ 2 \„ ,._ ..._... _ : _ VEGETATED t +
IM IMPACT W4 \ i yr .
\ _ ,- _ y.G; ..._._ �..r,....LOD O
_ -- - SEE DETAIL TEMPORARY WETL ND \� - - ,._..1 _ Lgp
BUFFER _ � _ _
„ _. . .. - ._ ._.... ..._ . _. ....._.._ u Fw-=-- :�••.�'�:. ---.. .,,_.:._ ._ w ,� w ._ _ -.d; ._ ... � ... w _. y.:_ y w � � 1. ; ;, _�. - � . _ _ � y w y - a y ` w y LOD O
w,. w v ti- .,.. _ i
_ ..._ 3 G2.16 FOR - - _.. - _ n..,..,.n.�""
\ / _ _ _. _
.... \. �,, � ...- - -- _. �,.,� ',. � �� _ ,... - 31;.2 _., _ _..._.. _ . -- _ _ - r..,,�...L
_ w w w-. y w . w i._...__ v _..._ .� - _._.w_ _ ._..�
RIP RAP � .. -�. .._,� ., ..__ _ WA,) _._ _... _...._....._ _ __ _._. _. D ,
VEGETATED - - -
\, - - LO 291 .50
DIMENSIONS a --- - .n......�
\ \` w \ ` \ \,,., SEE DETAIL L.. BUFFER- _ "_. y -.. u '` -� y w -y.. y r.�....a.�L / _- - -2916
\ _
-- - - - - - `��
v
- ._..._ 2 G2.15 FOR - - a w w w_...__ w w v -- y Al 2915 -- �
w w 7r y' . -'°'"^�:' "'"•"' .W ,�- ..arm..
� TYP ROAD --- _
-' 907.5 . ; ., � \ � -- _ -_- - - -
wi f" " $°6 3 11
,. - - z s
rn
L6D 00 \ __
- \
\ _..._ ,. - _ -.... ;� 2914 � rn
� --- �......
SECTION. - -- __.. .._ _. ___ -. - - , , _ ..._ - -____- ..�°m
i OD 290.50 - L
1 -
/ �. \ 2908.00 - .._
,
_ e
<. < .. _ .... ....... ..> _ - _ : '\ \ _.. , � . � 9?Ya � rte' au
%1 _- - - ,_ , -. . -. , ._ _ - , . _.-- ---- -- 2913 ___ _ - -- .�� , � � � , ,r � . .. �� .� . 291
.. \ `r
M 6
-..... n �..,,.
' - -�. _.
_ i 1 � 2907 �0\ ,.... - � - -_ _ < t
29 9.20 . �"'-- --, C
4 2909 OP LOP -- 2912
'�....
1rOD ,. _ 2909.00
>
_ rn
291 3 F w < .r
g 2915
2915.00
Z91 3 »
r ,:
.00 »
114 T ...._. \
...��'
--
..
... --.. :.<,. .- _ » N., ».. .. a _. ... .. �, .. ".'... O
. _ .- _.. - , -. .,. ». �, ., 'r. ..,...x. » ., ..., .. e... .- » -: -. . -„ ,::, .,,.:e - -:r,: ,,. .. .,,. .,
.h. .X,,.i. , Yr P . -,. _.
t a
_ ... _
908.
,
.<. .. .,.. ,.... x,- .,,.,,.. ..,,,. ......r, .... ..- ,.: -. .,. ...
13 12 r A _ _
LOD
%. 2913
- 2910.00 2911_-- •�. -�:_ \ � -� \ 29 LOD
g p , 2912 �- ....'��LOD.._ _ _ ..._.. _ 0 291450 2914.50
k g10 � 1 D �,wwomL - TURNAROUND" -- �
2911
2
91 - 2911
;,;- -- - ---, -- . ' �........■ l0 +m""""' LOD ,.
.
,ROAD TU NA v
Q Z9p9 291 r o�'�Ammm LOD ...�.,�„ LOD � w 909 s ; ; �..�...IOD wwwww .. LOD �"'�..�� LOD ........-
LOD 2 _ ■.■.......LO __.... _...._
STA 10 +00 CL ACCESS w _ ...... _ -., ..._
290. ti .... ,.. wwmw.w LOD �"'.�"'� LOD :. LOD
2911.51 2 i 1.51 LOD \ \ _ . - _ - - _.... _ _
ROAD 963 SF OF ` \ , \� LQp.�...�.. LOD �...... LOD \ \ - 1, - ... Oo �...� LOD �'.'....�.! .
r- _ ._...
-- \ -
NOTE:
\ LIMIT OF ! w w w w w y
- _ O � _ _ PERMANENT WETLAND \ \ � � � � `; � �\ «�.. \
° IMPACT TO WETLAND ,. ; \ �\
- T^ \\ \ > DISTURBANCE / i w w
v,
$, SEE DETAIL 2/G2.16 WA, IMPACT_ W3.. -- \ \
�LOD FOR DITCH SLOPES & - \ �` `' 1. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE
tIN ,, wmm..mLOD�r c� \ (TYPICAL) i \ \
kp \ \ \` ' // w y w w w w MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN PLACE AS SHOWN ON
DIMENSIONS (TYP.)
CULVERT P -4 ` ' \ _ / %' y SHEETS G2.11 THROUGH G2.13 UNTIL ALL
�< \\ LARRY COOPER ANDY COO �` `� w w DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND
(SEE SHEET G2.6) CULVERT P -4 (SEE LAR R PER `
�' ;� % / and AMY COOPER GREER FINAL APPROVAL FROM NCDENR LAND QUALITY
SCHEDULE ON THIS \SHEET) .\ ; / ; r /�' -2 r ; _ REMAINING PORTION OF w w SECTION IS PROVIDED.
D$: 1122 PG: 238 y'...
V� CULVERT CROSSING SCHEDULE t \ w ; \ \ " \ %% / PIN: 294 _ _68 -60,39 -000 2. CONTRACTOR MUST IDENTIFY SOURCE OF FILL
MATERIAL PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION
ui
N
W
,W
V /
O
H
W
Z
J
V
1
1 2930
1 2920
F-2910
Vx -
PIPE ID.
MATERIAL
DIA.
INVERT UP
INVERT DN
LENGTH
SLOPE
ENTRANCE/EXIT TYPE
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR- PROPOSED.DWG
P -4
RCP
30"
2907.30
2906.72
112.90'
0.51
PRE -CAST ENDWALL, SEE DETAIL 3/GO.6
LOT 2 TEST RESULTS SHOWING PROPOSED FILL MATERIALS
8112 MEET PROJECT SPECIFICATION MUST BE PROVIDED
ACRES +/-
AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO DELIVERY.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE
REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL PERMITS FOR ANY
\ NOTE: SEE DETAIL 1/G2.15 FOR TRENCHING DETAIL. \ ' - ' y 41 OFFSITE WASTE OR BORROW SITES USED FOR THIS
w w w w w PROJECT. CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT COPIES OF
--- _
w y w w y w THE EROSION CONTROL PERMITS TO THE OWNER TO
THE NCDENR- LAND QUALITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
GRAPHIC SCALE GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80' 5' 2.5' 0' 2.5' 5' 10'
1" 40' HORIZONTAL 1" = 5' VERTICAL
N
>�
w
lil
I
PVI STA: 154
E VL ELEV:. _.2t
K: 399.61
LVC: 20M
O
M
rq
w
2930
2920 1
2910 1
2900
E f i
€ t f
( V 3 (€
I
I
o I
I o
f
JQ ( MF I (Z
N Z ( -
wo '$ Iw ( U
v °w
- _ r O _
O� I i 0
00 9 +50 10 +00 10 +50 11 +00 11 +50 12 +00 12 +50 13 +00 13 +50 14 +00 14 +50 15 +00 15 +50 16 +00 16 +50 17 +00 17 +50 18 +00 18 +50 19 +00 19 [phone] +00 21 +50 22
9 +00
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
WK (828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR- PROPOSED.DWG
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
D I C KS0 N Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
REVISED IMPACT NOTES FOR 401/404 RESUBMISSION
3 -18 -15
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
W
STREAM AND IMPACT NOTES GIVEN SPECIFIC LABELS
11 -7 -12
REV. NO.1
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
WK (828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR- PROPOSED.DWG
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
D I C KS0 N Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
W
R4
SEAL
038088'� : LU
A� can
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
GRADING & DRAINAGE .PLAN
STA, 9 +00 TO 22 +00
Z
O
22 +00
G2.6
2.17
N
U
W
W
�
to
�
O
w
U
O
W
Ln
Q
W
W
C:)G
N
�
N
tJ')
LU
Z
1T-�I
i
Q
W
Z
II
22 +00
G2.6
2.17

Q
Z
� Y �
O �'0
W O
H O Z
Z-Q
N W =
F
0Z;�
00
U 0
W
W
= Z Y
W 2'
W Q
OFD
Wes.
Z W
ae O
0 U
O 0
� --
U _
0 Q F
O � W
Cy Z O
-J(n
d Q W
O Z_d
W U O
p U
L
LJ
W 3: W
w Z ~ ~
� � p
� pJ
Z Q
_ :2 >
=AI) n W
O�UWM
O 0
QUjU~
U ~ J 0
zppo
Z
OZ p0
O U
� Ld
Z-(Sm
W p
y�Q.Q
N -J
Y0UQ
?�
F-
-0
-0
@00Z pUQ
<%W Z�
Fg0�
y :p)U1Q
OOU�?
000(n
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
Em WK (828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
REVISED IMPACT NOTES FOR 401/404 RESUBMISSION
3 -18 -15
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
WDICKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
STREAM AND IMPACT NOTES GIVEN SPECIFIC LABELS
11 -7 -12
REV. NO.1
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
Em WK (828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR_PROPOSED.DWG
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
WDICKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
0'1/
y •.• 7
SEAL •.
038086
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
STA. 22+00 TO 30+91
G2.7,
2.171

L
Q
z
~ Y �
O 3t
w
00,
F i- a
Fw W=
r-
0z
w U 0
w
�wQf
wF-Q
o6��
war=
W
� O �
O�U
off°
2
DQF-
°z_o
w - Ld
K 0 w
o z a
w o
j Ow
w3wD
WZF_
Of
�o
�w
°>
_ :E
25cnw
0� U w m
O O
Q U ~
LO 0
�X:Z�
ZOOZ�
o0 oz
Uozwo
LL,
O w 0 �
Y a. Q
0 U U
Y -J � ,n
z L
o z
OQ °Q
0W Z
oF-
r�y<
a c) Y z
o0_2
000(f)
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SLOPES
WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE.
2. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SWALES
OR ROAD —SIDE DITCHES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/G0.5 WITHIN THE
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE.
3. ALL ROADSIDE DITCHES PROPOSED WITH THIS EROSION & SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN SHALL HAVE FIBER CHECK DAMS AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL 5/G0.5. FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE SPACED PER THE
TABLE SHOWN IN DETAIL 2/G2.16.
4. CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT ALL TERMINATING ENDS OF THE ROADSIDE
DITCHES SHALL BE ROCK CHECK DAMS PER DETAIL 5/G2.15. A
FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE SET 15' UPSTREAM OF THE ROCK
CHECK DAM FOR ADDED PROTECTION.
5. ONCE FINAL GRADING AND STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, APPLY
PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURES PER DETAIL 6/GO.5. THE
"PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE" SHOWN SHALL BE USED IN ALL
AREAS OUTSIDE THE INDICATED WETLAND AREAS AND STREAM BANKS.
THE "RIPARIAN SEED MIX" SHALL BE APPLIED IN WETLANDS AND
ALONG STREAM BANKS.
NOTE: DIVERSION DITCHES MUST BE AND S
OUTFLOWCTHROUGH PT 2 ABILIZED BE D
PROVIDE STREAM BYPASS WITH �' /fi: /// ` / �� / o
OF
IMPERVIOUS DIKE (5' TOTAL HEIGHT) AND ! '
THE SITE CAN BEGIN IN THIS AREA ///
PUMP AROUND AS SHOWN ON DETAILS 2 �` ' ' / �'% ESTABLISHED BEFORE CLEARING EA
;;� / i ./ i� �y / .
\
& 3, SHEET GO.7
(PHASE 1 & 2)
CONSTRUCT CUT PORTION OF
\ TEMPORARY GRAVEL %' %'�' / ' / / %!;/ ' /' P/ GJP DITCHES PER FINAL GRADING f- RONALD SIDNEY COOPER and
j" \ / �Q PLAN. DITCHES SHOWN ON DONALD L COOPER
, / / ;
CONSTRUCTION 1 ,,; r/ / / � ,/; ' /x , ' ,�- / " P
ENTRANCE, SEE / %i; r i" / /j' / ' / - THIS SHEET SHALL BE TREATED
DB: 1288 PG: 634
/ AS FLOW DIVERSIONS WITH PIN: 2942 -87 -1802 -000
DETAIL 1 /GO.5
!
(PHASE 1 & 2) \ /� % ! %/` /t / //' / / \ FIBER CHECK DAMS FOR E/S
/ \ / CONTROLS. o
CULVERT P -1 .p
SEE SHEET G2.14
TEMP. ROCK INLET s �O
/ / PROTECTION,. LINE CHANNEL WITH o G
SEE DETAIL 3/G0.5 EROSION CONTROL '1p
ri�/ MATTING, SEE
// (PHASE 1 & 2} �'J-
/ w,
// / r/ / ao / TAIL
FIBER CHECK DAMS
/
/ (TYP., SEE NOTE 4 _ ..... OD i" PROVIDE TEMPORARY STREAM
TEMPORARY ROC � 00
/ '4�f ON THIS SHEET CHECK DAM Q00 /=
/ ��� CROSSING AT P -3 LOCATION AS
)' (TYP,) LO \ 400 NEEDED TO INSTALL PERIMETER
SEE DETAIL 5/G0.5 DETAIL 5/G2.15 !�_
lOD ,. CONTROLS FOR THE SITE. SEE k
SOD
/; ! % f I / _,�,�.�.■LOD DETAIL 2/G4.1 FOR TEMPORARY
!
CREEK CROSSING DETAIL.. �
2907 6 +00 08 CULVERT P -3
�Op / \ (SEE SHEET G2.5 FOR
07 j 5 +00 FINAL CULVERT
DIMENSIONS)
A.+00 _ \ PROVIDE STREAM BYPASS WITH
0
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
HEIGHT) AND PUMP AROUND
• / , ` IMPERVIOUS DIKE (4' TOTAL
/ ?x00 3 +00 / - ...... r '. %, /j / / / AS SHOWN ON DETAILS 2 & 3,
SHEET GO .7. (RASE 1 & )
O�
r
v--
-
i,
to D _ _ ,�- s r - �s
46 LOD F
W
-.,-
... _
o --
_
\
1 ,
LA18
x
_ __ -� , � _ _ _- _ _ _..._ __ T STREAM W/ SILT. �i � <, \;• -, .
ado Jt� /�� �w a w....,. _ -w av LIMIT OF
FENCE DURING INSTALLATION /fit
p / OF CULVERT' Qr
DISTURBANC �;
rc 1
PZ /JP — TEMP. SILT FENCE,
. \� \ SILT FENCE (TYPICAL)
g
P TYPICAL, SEE \ \ OUTFALL SEE
DETAIL 2/G0.6 \� i DETAIL 4/GO.5 w �'
(PHASE 1 & 2) \ x (PHASE \ 1 & 2) / / ;, ` °O
CULVERT P -2 0 °O', j GHv
(SEE SHEET G2.5 FOR - 7
/ \.\
CULVERT INVERTS &
GRADING OF OUTFA ;
` j i '` `9
CHANNEL) `
it
0
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
RWH
DRAWN BY
1 " =50
PROJECT DATE
�WK
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB
APPROVED BY
MARCH 2015
PROJECT NUMBER
DICKSION
NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
BIDDING
JPK
FILE NAME
80376.00.1-11
community infrastructure consultants
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
CONSTRUCTION
80376AR_EC - PHASE 1.DWG
South Carolina
RECORD DWG.
DATE \�� 1 I) t ✓/
SEAL -
=� .
03$086, ' w =
.�
ems..
A. SRQ��`\�
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONS
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1
STA 0 +00 TO 9 +00
z
Ll
\n
Z
L�
0
w
c\
LLJ
W
0
U\
W
z
LL_
G2.8
2.17

� J
Z
Z
� Y �
0 0
wo
U) oz
Z�Q
z V)
O 3
00
w00
Uj
= Z Y
F w a
a Q
O F-:2
Ld
U Z
Dew
fog
oF�
03°
" <_
0 Q
°
oaw
Of z0
a. _ N
��aW
oza
LL,
0 J U
> °ow
W�
wz��
-J
z O>
0 mow
a U w m
�paUO
Q U ~
0
U ~Ja
z000
rn
o(noz
U ZO w 0
F
�WO]w
Z J =CD
OwOJ
U7 °a' J
Y a Q
UO�2
O 0
V) -J
Y O U C
?� Z N
.p
O.0
0
Q
t W
U w Z
MOP
)D(na
0090
U 00(n
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SLOPES
WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/G0.5 WITHIN THE GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE.
2. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SWALES
OR ROAD -SIDE DITCHES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE.
3. ALL ROADSIDE DITCHES PROPOSED WITH THIS EROSION & SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN SHALL HAVE FIBER CHECK DAMS AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL 5 /GO.5. FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE SPACED PER THE
TABLE SHOWN IN DETAIL 2/G2.16.
4. CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT ALL TERMINATING ENDS OF THE ROADSIDE
DITCHES SHALL BE ROCK CHECK DAMS PER DETAIL 5/G2.15. A
FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE SET 15' UPSTREAM OF THE ROCK
CHECK DAM FOR ADDED PROTECTION.
5. ONCE FINAL GRADING AND STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, APPLY
PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURES PER DETAIL 6/G0.5. THE
"PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE" SHOWN SHALL BE USED 1N ALL
AREAS OUTSIDE THE INDICATED WETLAND AREAS AND STREAM BANKS.
THE "RIPARIAN SEED MIX" SHALL BE APPLIED IN WETLANDS AND
ALONG STREAM BANKS.
141
PROP,
-.
\ „
1
_..
._
-
\ \ _ - -
\
i
o- / , TEMP. SILT FENCE`-,, 5 _. ....._
_ \ , \ -
_ __ 2 i o---__ ._ .., .. \ \• •. � � EE DETAIL 2 G0.6 � _ _ . _
\ \ _
-�\ \ / - -
SILT FENCE \ ,,, SILT FENCE PHASE 1 & 2 \ - - -... _. ..... _. _ - -.._
TFALL SEE _ _... __ . - \�. \ .,, - . - 1 _ _. _... _ - - - - - -._- -
OU _ / ..w• ... m OUTFACE SEE - _ - w w.. -_ .:: :.._ i - J- - -
_
_- . __.
DETAIL 4 G0.5 \ ,_ _ _ LO
/ . \ \ _..__ - _ %,.. DETAIL 4/GO.5 _.._ ._.._ __ _._. �.._.. :..._ _. .. _ _ - COD'
_ PROTECT STREAM W/ SILT '. _ _ . - _ \\..
3 \ - _ -
PHASE 1 & 2 ~ '
-.:.__ --
\. "`. = PHASE 1 & 2 { {. ----= - ' -,._:. LOD
( ) -__ \ FENCE DURING INSTALLATION ( ) �\ \ ` \ - --- - LOD L
\ \ .....'��;,,,,. ,• PROVIDE TEMPORARY STREAM \. ,,\ : ��..,�W: �- � ..r � -� � �
LO
- \ OF CULVERT -
�- .. y r LOD
:, • ._- - \ \ \ \�,.` ` CROSSING AT P -4 LOCATION AS -�-
_._ ,._NEEDED TO INSTALL PERIMETER
CULVERT P -4 SEE `\CONTROLS FOR THE SITE. SEE - - -- �m i�
\ \ \ \ ( _ \ 1'11
SHEET G2.3 FOR FINAL \.. -.._
\. DETAIL 2 G4.1 FOR TEMPORARY r, A _.. \ _- --- 2 lit
�► U L \ \\\ ­
,CULVERT DIMENSIONS) /- "' "9,i3 - L -/
-- ---- v'
CREEK CROSSING DETAIL. .. - _�'._ { p0 - (n
2 , - - --
�',, \ 1
\ ,
C Y,
\ \ LOQ 'Op -
.. 18 oo �rf1 -i
10 00
11+00 _... _ L
\ 0 \ °D N
' 1.6. _00
/ _ -_ LOD
\ \
0 \ 13 00
t
' 00
15 -
10 _ D L
\ 14 ' � �i- OD OD 2915 0
. .... _ . _ . _ _ L LOD
2911 2911 \ - L _ ._ r
� 3 "•
:
LOD -
w\
LOD..�..LOD~ 2912 291 2909 :. w \ L L00
0
1. L00 �
OD i
�n `. \ \ - L p,�,......... LOD I 08
0 ...... _. ..._. _._ _
_ ;
-
\ LIMIT OF
LINE CHANNEL WITH \ \ \ - -
EROSION CONTROL FIBER CHECK DAMS ` DISTURBANCE
Q \ \
MATTING, SEE (TYP., SEE NOTE 4 `� •� , (TYPICAL)
\ TEMP. SILT FENCE,
DETAIL 1 GO.6
ON L THIS SHEET), SEE DETAIL 2/G0.6
SEE DETAIL 5/G0.5 (PHASE 1 & 2)
NOTE: DIVERSION DITCH MUST BE
CONSTRUCTED AND STABILIZED AND -
OUTFLOW THROUGH P -2 MUST BE --- ..._._
ESTABLISHED BEFORE CLEARING OF TEMPORARY ROCK
THE SITE CAN BEGIN IN THIS AREA. CHECK DAM
.. .- (TYP.), SEE \ \
....._ ... , \ DETAIL 5/G2.15
PROVIDE STREAM BYPASS WITH
\ IMPERVIOUS DIKE (4' TOTAL
HEIGHT) AND PUMP AROUND AS
SHOWN . ON DETAILS 2 & 3,
SHEET GO.7 UNTIL CULVERT °~ �a _ � °. , • • .. � ' '
P -4 IS ESTABLISHED. (PHASE 1 LARRY .COOPER, RANDY COOPER,
`� and AMY COOPER GREER
& 2) REMAINING PORTION OF
/ D8: 1122 PG. 238
PIN. 2942- 68- 6039- 000
5
LOT 2
/Q Opp
REMAINING +
81.12 ACRES /-
OO F�Op1
\�#
4�
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
DATE
= EAL 9••�'
= 038088
i® • aCiti���:` g ��
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1
STA 9 +00 TO 22 +00
G2.
Z
O
U
U
LL
Cn
ly-
W
z
z
CD
En
W
J
L
2.171
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1 " =40'
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR_EC - PHASE 1.DWG
WK
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
APPROVALS
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
DATE
= EAL 9••�'
= 038088
i® • aCiti���:` g ��
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1
STA 9 +00 TO 22 +00
G2.
Z
O
U
U
LL
Cn
ly-
W
z
z
CD
En
W
J
L
2.171

� J
2 z
Z
O�0
o
0Oz
ZFQ
L'iW=
oo�
W U 0
Uj
= Z Y
f W w
W h Q
O � �
w3�
D z
D W
Q�O�
OFZU
off°
U < _
D Q F
0
�zo
W V)
K Q W
oZa
W O
O
U
J
Uj O= O W
Ld LLJ
L0
�e
o J
�w >
w U _W m
JOB O
JooF
Q U
0
U ~ J Of
?000
O Z p Z
U Z W O
O � U
�WmW
Z W 0
TM
U)0 d' J
Y " d Q
Q O U C0
Y O U W
?� H Z
@°aoa
Fh atW
Mzzw
Yg0j
5— <
OOU�?
0 0Un
3'
H
M
-REVI-SIONS -A,
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
RWH
1"=40'
DRAWN BY
PROJECT DATE
RAB
MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY
PROJECT NUMBER
JPK
80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR -EC - PHASE
1.DWG
CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED
_ -- - _ - -- _._. ACCESS -ROAD, SEE E S PHASE
.-
- _ . 11 CONTROL SHEETS FOR FINAL
SEDIMENT CONTROLS
- - --
S
-._ - ---` - - -_
Z.
\
j —
/ W /
LOD
OD LO
= 1A N Oq'
�-
— ....._ _.-
27 00
28 00 ... \ \X
,\
j. \\ , \ \\ , \ \\
- ...
29 .�
TOPSOIL STOCKPILE, \
SEE DETAIL 2/GO.5 \
�...� \ \ \ \\
TOWN OF BOONE
DB: 1425 PG: 405
A PORTION OF
PIN: 2942- 68- 6039- 000
LOT 1
4J5,595 SQ. FT.
10.00 ACRES
(PHASE 1 AS
- - \ \ �. TEMP. SILT FENCE,
NEEDED) Op OD :\\ \ \ \\,, �\ \ SEE DETAIL 2/G0.6
(PHASE 1 & 2)
100 -YEAR FEMA FLOODWAY LIMITS
(STOCKPILING WITHIN FLOODWAY
LIMITS IS NOT PERMITTED)
F.
.. . - ..... ......... _.._.,
LIMIT OF
DISTURBANCE
(TYPICAL) \
j "'0'110 �
NOTE: IF STOCKPILE AREA SHOWN IS NOT fi
/ SUFFICIENT FOR GRADING /EARTHWORK REQUIRED,
_....... ... .- . ........ _.
DB: 1122 PG. 238
PIN: 2942-68-6039-000
LOT 2
REMAINING AREA
81.12 ACRES +/-
DATE
i1E •�
038086 �.: LU =
s �A' B* v*t*
*O�\
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SLOPES
WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/G0.5 WITHIN THE GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE.
2. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SWALES
OR ROAD -SIDE DITCHES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE.
3. ALL ROADSIDE DITCHES PROPOSED WITH THIS EROSION & SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN SHALL HAVE FIBER CHECK DAMS AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL 5/G0.5. FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE SPACED PER THE
TABLE SHOWN IN DETAIL 2/G2.16.
4. CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT ALL TERMINATING ENDS OF THE ROADSIDE
DITCHES SHALL BE ROCK CHECK DAMS PER DETAIL 5/G2.15. A
FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE SET 15' UPSTREAM OF THE ROCK
CHECK DAM FOR ADDED PROTECTION.
5. ONCE FINAL GRADING AND STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, APPLY
PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURES PER DETAIL 6/GO.5. THE
"PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE" SHOWN SHALL BE USED IN ALL
AREAS OUTSIDE THE INDICATED WETLAND AREAS AND STREAM BANKS.
THE "RIPARIAN SEED MIX" SHALL BE APPLIED IN WETLANDS AND
ALONG STREAM BANKS.
_
\ i \ \ \` •,, \` OUNp PRA 4
j \ /
/ COUNTS
fAUG?._.. 6NTY
CO
A
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
FORC�PSS ...�
SSRTN36
-
APPROX. LOCATION
Op OF RIVER TRANSITION
�(� C FROM CLASS IV TO
PPPRO 5�R .35A CLASS C
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1
STA 22 +00 TO 30 +90
2.1
z
0
U
z
0
U
0
LL
0
W
W
O
z
CD
W
Q
z
LL
2.171
401 4th STREET SW,
SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
WK
HICKORY,
(828)
NC 28602
327 -6911
APPROVALS
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
BIDDING
D 'C��ON
Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants
North Carolina
Georgia
CONSTRUCTION
South Carolina
RECORD DWG.
_....... ... .- . ........ _.
DB: 1122 PG. 238
PIN: 2942-68-6039-000
LOT 2
REMAINING AREA
81.12 ACRES +/-
DATE
i1E •�
038086 �.: LU =
s �A' B* v*t*
*O�\
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SLOPES
WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/G0.5 WITHIN THE GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE.
2. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SWALES
OR ROAD -SIDE DITCHES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE.
3. ALL ROADSIDE DITCHES PROPOSED WITH THIS EROSION & SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN SHALL HAVE FIBER CHECK DAMS AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL 5/G0.5. FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE SPACED PER THE
TABLE SHOWN IN DETAIL 2/G2.16.
4. CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT ALL TERMINATING ENDS OF THE ROADSIDE
DITCHES SHALL BE ROCK CHECK DAMS PER DETAIL 5/G2.15. A
FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE SET 15' UPSTREAM OF THE ROCK
CHECK DAM FOR ADDED PROTECTION.
5. ONCE FINAL GRADING AND STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, APPLY
PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURES PER DETAIL 6/GO.5. THE
"PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE" SHOWN SHALL BE USED IN ALL
AREAS OUTSIDE THE INDICATED WETLAND AREAS AND STREAM BANKS.
THE "RIPARIAN SEED MIX" SHALL BE APPLIED IN WETLANDS AND
ALONG STREAM BANKS.
_
\ i \ \ \` •,, \` OUNp PRA 4
j \ /
/ COUNTS
fAUG?._.. 6NTY
CO
A
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
FORC�PSS ...�
SSRTN36
-
APPROX. LOCATION
Op OF RIVER TRANSITION
�(� C FROM CLASS IV TO
PPPRO 5�R .35A CLASS C
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1
STA 22 +00 TO 30 +90
2.1
z
0
U
z
0
U
0
LL
0
W
W
O
z
CD
W
Q
z
LL
2.171

J
Q
z
� Y �
0 �
LL0
cn 0z
z�Q
Zw=
Z (n t-
oo�
w
00
=
z
a
LLI
w
(Y 0
0m,
0
U _
0 Q F
00 L..
Of z0
a-
� th
0za.
wC90
O J O
> O W
0z�~
Of M 0
Z
ZOJ
>
O UU)w
U W OJ
J 0 0
Q�U
U h J O
?OOowp
0
°z°o
O U
°3
F-
LA _j
0 w 0 J
U1�CL J
Y d Q
U0L2
O
(n -J
Y p U W
H z U)
0 -�
UOQ OU Q
F-' -d w
K20
rDCQ
0020
000(n
0
/
All
C)
PROVIDE STREAM BYPASS WITH
IMPERVIOUS DIKE (5' TOTAL HEIGHT) AND
PUMP AROUND AS SHOWN ON DETAILS 2 %/' ' /
& 3, SHEET GO.7 / r /,r ;/ / -!Xi
(PHASE 1 & 2)
t f •, � j , // , / / / /,, � , � � / Pg / P CONSTRUCT CUT PORTION OF
\ TEMPORARY GRAVEL
DITCHES PER FINAL GRADING
/ AIr PLAN. DITCHES SHOWN ON
CONSTRUCTION l // /'j / /' �; " �; \. '' '' %l INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG / �Q THIS SHEET SHALL BE TREATED
ENTRANCE, SEE ,1 � f; /ir �' /' ',' ��'
%/ / , /,'� , j , % / CULVERT HEADWALL AND / AS FLOW DIVERSIONS WITH
DETAIL 1/130.5 r // / /i Oj /j / CHANNEL BANKS
FIBER CHECK DAMS FOR E/S
(PHASE 1 & 2) / / �:: / \,\
'�/ CONTROLS. o
\ /� / � i %ice O � � �� 7 ` / ' /ir / / / /' ! ♦\
CULVERT P -1
(SEE SHEET G2.14)
TEMP. ROCK INLET s�
LINE CHANNEL WITH o
PROTECTION, DITCH L2 SEE
EROSION CONTROL
1 L1
DITCH SEE DETAIL 3 GO.5
SEE / MATTING, SEE DETAIL 2/132.16
/
DETAIL 2/G2.16 (PHA & 2) DETAIL 1 GO.6
i . ...... _.
SE 1
`07°° ~` DAMS
FIBER CHECK
TEMPORARY ROCK lOD "1
(TYP., SEE NOTE 4 - -
INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG '/ �' �'' \` \ \ \, ON THIS SHEET CHECK DAM ���
r �
\i / 1 i,� :f x f . (:. ; �` a \ \ \ / ), (TYP.) SEE Lot _7 00
CULVERT HEADWALL AND %�., '; r;,`, \ \ \ \ \., \ / SEE DETAIL 5/130.5 ;
CHANNEL BANKS r, ,. \ \ DETAIL 5/132.15 L ,. _..
f� LOD 1, "....._
\
L. _
-
\ r
O
"
2
x 6 #-00
�r
s � r
i 3
, g L
\ _ ".
) "
/ yp ,... - ......,. ,.
\ \`
/ \
, w
J , , 0(1 "
"
t
/
/ . . , 4 r OCR..
\ i s <., /
\
/ \ \
" qD
WW /
/ \
"
_
_
\
FOR FIBER CHECK DAM
SPACING ALONG / DITCH R1 SEE
O
PROPOSED ROADSIDE ''. / DETAIL 2/132.16- -�- ..- - -- - "- LO �, i �� ;,_ _ ,. . ,- �•"
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SLOPES
WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/60.5 WITHIN THE GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE.
2. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SWALES
OR ROAD -SIDE DITCHES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE.
3. ALL ROADSIDE DITCHES PROPOSED WITH THIS EROSION & SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN SHALL HAVE FIBER CHECK DAMS AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL 5/GO.5. FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE SPACED PER THE
TABLE SHOWN IN DETAIL 2/G2.16.
4. CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT ALL TERMINATING ENDS OF THE ROADSIDE
DITCHES SHALL BE ROCK CHECK DAMS PER DETAIL 5/G2.15. A
FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE SET 15' UPSTREAM OF THE ROCK
CHECK DAM FOR ADDED PROTECTION.
5. ONCE FINAL GRADING AND STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, APPLY
PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURES PER DETAIL 6/GO.5. THE
"PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE" SHOWN SHALL BE USED IN ALL
AREAS OUTSIDE THE INDICATED WETLAND AREAS AND STREAM BANKS.
THE "RIPARIAN SEED MIX" SHALL BE APPLIED IN WETLANDS AND
ALONG STREAM BANKS.
RONALD SIDNEY COOPER and
DONALD L COOPER %
DB. 1288 PG: 634
PIN. 2942 -87 -1802 -000
k k /
INSTALL SILT FENCE
ALONG CULVERT k
HEADWALL <
k
DITCH L3 SEE
W
DETAIL 2/G2.16
k
CULVERT P -3
SEE SHEET G
( E G2.5 FOR
_.. _
DITCHES, SEE DETAIL" /_ tOD.. _.. -.. - - _: _,' _.._ t i _ N_ ' Cy
t_ _ _ -_ _ .....__ _ - -- -
T -; y = _ ....- -._... __ ...... _ - ........ _ . _... _._ ..._ - _ .... _ - - DITCH R2 SEE TEMPORARY ROCK \ \
2/G2.16 YP. -
_. O
_ _: -- , -- �.. -- �......- _ . _..�.._ - — _. - -_ -- DETAIL 2/132.16 CHECK DAM
_.� _
_.. _.. TEMP. FIBER
• : �.....'. - .. _. '�`._. _ ��..� � ... � (TYP.), SEE ' '�' '• \ ��\\
AA5 - = CHECK DAM -- DETAIL 5/132.15 \
-1 - - _ \� \
TYP. , SEE y- w
OJ ( ) 7 LIMIT OF
DETAIL 5/GO.5
DISTURBANC \
\ ' (TYPICAL) / INSTALL SILT FENCE
TEMP. SILT FENCE, \\ \ SILT FENCE ALONG CULVERT \�
P G TYPICAL, SEE \ OUTFALL SEE / \
/ � o HEADWALL
/ P DETAIL 2/GO.6 \ \ ,; DETAIL 4/GO.5 TEMPORARY ROCK -- € \
/ (PHASE 1 & 2)\\ (PHASE 1 & 2) CHECK DAM
/ \ (TYP.), SEE
DETAIL 2 R /13216
_DETAIL 5/132.15
CULVERT P -2
`yo (SEE SHEET 132.5 FOR
`r CULVERT INVERTS &
GRADING OF OUTFA
/ CHANNEL) i
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH 1 " =50
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER.
JPK 80376:00.HI
FILE NAME
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
DICKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants . North Carolina Georgia
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
80376AR -EC - PHASE 2.DWG
South Carolina
�a
7
038086
7
FINAL CULVERT
,/
DIMENSIONS k
PROVIDE STREAM BYPASS WITH
IMPERVIOUS DIKE 4' TOTAL
\ (
s� -
/ DPU P
HEIGHT AN M AROUND
AS SHOWN ON DETAILS 2 & 3,
SHEET 130.7. PHASE 1 & 2
/
, 1
/
f '
.DITCH L4, SEE '•\
DETAIL 2/G2.16
9
\ ` `
o°
\ \ \ \ <, h '
vas 1 DITCH L5, SEE
\� < DETAIL 2/62.16
132
,
5 ,
�0 t,
MPS
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
Z
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2
STA 0 +00 TO 9 +00
z
O
i-
U
O
V)
z
O
U
O
L�
0
W
Cn
Q
W
W
F,
O
z
z
CD
(f)
W
Q
_z
LL_
IG2.1
2.171

L J
S Q
Z
~ Y �
03�
0
zr-a
mow=
Z W
oz°�
W U 0
S z Y
�wOf
0 F Q
w�
w
Qf °
O U
ZO 0
V) _
U _
D<
O a W
(if z°
W J U
�0aW
°za
J 0
0 � U
j0 Ow
WSW=
Lv) Z
x :2o
,-0
cn J
Z Q
_ >
Uz(n W
Q�U WM
Q U ~
U H J W,
zoo0
U)
oVoz
U ZZ FW O
-U
�WmW
Z J = CO
O w O J
U) J
Y d Q
U O _
W
z -J
YOZLq
3 F Z
OQ °Q
_ z Q Ld
�o��
5-5y<
o0_2
U 00 U)
fir. v4` � y 'y^' � '!r O �i '1✓ l! ` -
w
41 1�1
\
TEMPORARY ROCK
CHECK DAM \
;.; \ \ `
(TYP.), SEE �\ \
3
v�A
2
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SLOPES
WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE.
2. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SWALES
OR ROAD -SIDE DITCHES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE.
3. ALL ROADSIDE DITCHES PROPOSED WITH THIS EROSION & SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN SHALL HAVE FIBER CHECK DAMS AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL 5/GO.5. FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE SPACED PER THE
TABLE SHOWN IN DETAIL 2/G2.16.
4. CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT ALL TERMINATING ENDS OF THE ROADSIDE
DITCHES SHALL BE ROCK CHECK DAMS PER DETAIL 5/G2.15. A
FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE SET 15' UPSTREAM OF THE ROCK
CHECK DAM FOR ADDED PROTECTION.
5. ONCE FINAL GRADING AND STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, APPLY
PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURES PER DETAIL 6 /GO.5. THE
"PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE" SHOWN SHALL BE USED IN ALL
AREAS OUTSIDE THE INDICATED WETLAND AREAS AND STREAM BANKS.
THE "RIPARIAN SEED MIX" SHALL BE APPLIED IN WETLANDS AND
ALONG STREAM BANKS.
Ln
M
M
N
W
LOD - _ - _...-
- - --
DITCH R4, SEE OD ` _ -._ - ".
LOD __ .. D L —
0
DITCH R5, SEE
DETAIL 2/G2.16 LC7iTii�i„�„a�LOD' $ ' - — ..LOD�""'�"'nLOD \ LO DETAIL 2/G2.16 l - ... ..... -
_ r
-"
OD
DITCH R3, SEE .,.. - :._ _ - ._..... _. - - - - \ � \ \� � �.�
DETAIL 2/G2.16 ' LINE CHANNEL WITH \ \ �� \ \ �� ' TEMPORARY ROCK LIMIT OF �...
EROSION CONTROL ` ��� `� DISTURBANCE f
FIBER CHECK DAMS �O CHECK DAM
MATTING, TEMP. SILT FENCE, U
�Le SEE (TYP., SEE NOTE 4 \ .,\ \ (TYP.), SEE /i . (TYPICAL)
DETAIL 1/G0.6 ON THIS SHEET) \��\ DETAIL 5/G2.15 i ' %
INSTALL SILT SEE DETAIL 5/GO.5 \� /� / w ` ` (PHASE DETAIL 2 ,G0.6
�\
FENCE ALONG ��: "� -- ;..\ \ '� � -� -- ,- � FOR FIBER CHECK DAM � �• � •�
CULVERT INSTALL SILT >` \� SPACING ALONG I—
HEADWALL FENCE ALONG �3
TEMPORARY ROCK CULVERT\ PROPOSED ROADSIDE (�
\ DITCHES, SEE DETAIL
= CHECK DAM \ HEADWALL �' ��``�\ 2/G2.16 _ ...._.
(TYP.), SEE
`. P O
r,• DETAIL 5/G2.15
PROVIDE STREAM BYPASS WITH /
IMPERVIOUS DIKE (4' TOTAL �' „ -`\ _. ” .. ...... l°
.\ HEIGHT) AND PUMP AROUND AS 0
SHOWN ON DETAILS 2 & 3, ..<' L
SHEET GO.7 UNTIL CULVERT �... , � LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER, L
P-4 IS ESTABLISHED. (PHASE T� and AMY COOPER GREER
& 2) REMAINING POR77ON OF 0
/ DB. 1122 PG: 238 W
PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -000
P LOT 2 Q
REMAINING AREA
�y>P00� 81.12 ACRES +/- W
F��o F�d01 ( W
Z
U�
W
D
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
___�---- -
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1 " =50
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
APPROVED MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR_EC - PHASE 2.DWG
D �CKSON
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
APPROVALS
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
-291 -
` \\_
4
.. __ .__
.. ..
1 -
i �3
Y• `
_.
-
TEMPORARY ROCK - ...._ .._._ - -- _......
r
CHECK DAM
_
H
TYP.), ( SEE - --
..
Ln
M
M
N
W
LOD - _ - _...-
- - --
DITCH R4, SEE OD ` _ -._ - ".
LOD __ .. D L —
0
DITCH R5, SEE
DETAIL 2/G2.16 LC7iTii�i„�„a�LOD' $ ' - — ..LOD�""'�"'nLOD \ LO DETAIL 2/G2.16 l - ... ..... -
_ r
-"
OD
DITCH R3, SEE .,.. - :._ _ - ._..... _. - - - - \ � \ \� � �.�
DETAIL 2/G2.16 ' LINE CHANNEL WITH \ \ �� \ \ �� ' TEMPORARY ROCK LIMIT OF �...
EROSION CONTROL ` ��� `� DISTURBANCE f
FIBER CHECK DAMS �O CHECK DAM
MATTING, TEMP. SILT FENCE, U
�Le SEE (TYP., SEE NOTE 4 \ .,\ \ (TYP.), SEE /i . (TYPICAL)
DETAIL 1/G0.6 ON THIS SHEET) \��\ DETAIL 5/G2.15 i ' %
INSTALL SILT SEE DETAIL 5/GO.5 \� /� / w ` ` (PHASE DETAIL 2 ,G0.6
�\
FENCE ALONG ��: "� -- ;..\ \ '� � -� -- ,- � FOR FIBER CHECK DAM � �• � •�
CULVERT INSTALL SILT >` \� SPACING ALONG I—
HEADWALL FENCE ALONG �3
TEMPORARY ROCK CULVERT\ PROPOSED ROADSIDE (�
\ DITCHES, SEE DETAIL
= CHECK DAM \ HEADWALL �' ��``�\ 2/G2.16 _ ...._.
(TYP.), SEE
`. P O
r,• DETAIL 5/G2.15
PROVIDE STREAM BYPASS WITH /
IMPERVIOUS DIKE (4' TOTAL �' „ -`\ _. ” .. ...... l°
.\ HEIGHT) AND PUMP AROUND AS 0
SHOWN ON DETAILS 2 & 3, ..<' L
SHEET GO.7 UNTIL CULVERT �... , � LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER, L
P-4 IS ESTABLISHED. (PHASE T� and AMY COOPER GREER
& 2) REMAINING POR77ON OF 0
/ DB. 1122 PG: 238 W
PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -000
P LOT 2 Q
REMAINING AREA
�y>P00� 81.12 ACRES +/- W
F��o F�d01 ( W
Z
U�
W
D
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
DATE
Z. • �/ °r
•7
os8osse1
f SOp``�
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2
STA 9 +00 TO 22 +00
Q
2.1
2.17
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1 " =50
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
APPROVED MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR_EC - PHASE 2.DWG
D �CKSON
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
APPROVALS
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
DATE
Z. • �/ °r
•7
os8osse1
f SOp``�
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2
STA 9 +00 TO 22 +00
Q
2.1
2.17

� J
Q
Z
� Y �
�a
�oz
zZQ
�W=
z V)
0z
w U O
= z Y
h w a
w H Q
0��
LL,
EW
D
O
O�0
o�°
F—
U � _
� QI-
oaw
fh z0
D_ - J N
U�Qw
0za
wC5O
° J U
> °ow
wZ ~~
af o
F :O J
z Q
> LLI
X U W m
J °00
°
U F_ J
?OOo
0 ho
�Wmw
z _j
°0
�wa¢
p 0
z ^J
Y � U W
� F--
OQ
� : Uj
C=7WzD
�2
a 0 Y Z
OOU0
U° °(n
---
/
... - -
^
_-
/i " -- - _
/ 1lV11
ji %Zg D LO p DITCH L12, SEE
Lo' 4'
�,. DETAIL 2/G2.16
-
_
_-
-
.. _.... _
\
,. ,
.f.
,.. 2
/. .. \\
" - . \•
„
\.
DITCH L12 SEE .� : g ..
_ .
^ ,. ,
"
_ .. DETAIL 2 G2 16 :.. . , \ go� .
.. _ ,.. . .
_ /.
S
i
v \
4
\
\
._ _ _ .. .., ,< ,. �. _,, ~~^ `\. � '`\ \;`•
_ __
_.... _ _ ,� o _ v
_ _ ,; . vv
_. ter..
- i . ;, .. ,, oD v v
- -
.- .TEMPORARY ROCK -:. 1 DITCH L13, .SEE vv
- : - -_ Av \
e2 CHECK DAMS. yA v,
_ c�- . / . -_ - vfig „ ,. „ DETAIL 2 G2.16 y�
2. "- /
SILT FENCE....: ! ✓.i� �, (p �,
--- - ' ' - : - TYP. SEE °r- ✓, � D �`'`.
( )�
OUTFACE SEE
^„
„
" c..;
D ', , - % DETAIL 5/G2.15
.."' ,,,,, • . „ ,, \ � ; ' ` O - . - . ,,, \ \ .
DETAIL 4 G0.5 , :', .
OD
H
M
M
M
Z
M
G)
N
mum • •
•
LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER,
and AMY COOPER GREER
REMAINING PORTION OF
DB: 1122 PG. 238
PIN: 2942- 68- 6039- 000
LOT 2
REMAINING AREA
81.12 ACRES +/-
DATE
•SEAL 7 �
r•
038088 ~' -
J _t Ut I NIL L /tvV.O.
(PHASE 1 & 2)
1
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
R0�1�P�� vv
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SLOPES
WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE.
2. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SWALES
OR ROAD -SIDE DITCHES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE.
3. ALL ROADSIDE DITCHES PROPOSED WITH THIS EROSION & SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN SHALL HAVE FIBER CHECK DAMS AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL 5/GO.5. FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE SPACED PER THE
TABLE SHOWN IN DETAIL 2/G2.16. .
4. CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT ALL TERMINATING ENDS OF THE ROADSIDE
DITCHES SHALL BE ROCK CHECK DAMS PER DETAIL 5/G2.15. A
FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE SET 15' UPSTREAM OF THE ROCK
CHECK DAM FOR ADDED PROTECTION.
5. ONCE FINAL GRADING AND STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, APPLY
PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURES PER DETAIL 6/GO.5. THE
"PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE" SHOWN SHALL BE USED IN ALL
AREAS OUTSIDE THE INDICATED WETLAND AREAS AND STREAM BANKS.
THE "RIPARIAN SEED MIX" SHALL BE APPLIED IN WETLANDS AND
ALONG STREAM BANKS.
TOWN OF BOONS
DB: 1425 PG. 405
A PORTION OF
PIN: 2942- 68- 6039- 000
LOT 1
4J5,595 SQ. FT.
10.00 ACRES
TEMP. SILT FENCE,
SEE DETAIL 2/GO.6
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1 " =50
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR_EC - PHASE 2.DWG
WK
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
APPROVALS
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER,
and AMY COOPER GREER
REMAINING PORTION OF
DB: 1122 PG. 238
PIN: 2942- 68- 6039- 000
LOT 2
REMAINING AREA
81.12 ACRES +/-
DATE
•SEAL 7 �
r•
038088 ~' -
J _t Ut I NIL L /tvV.O.
(PHASE 1 & 2)
1
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
R0�1�P�� vv
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SLOPES
WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE GROUND COVER
SCHEDULE.
2. TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPOSED SWALES
OR ROAD -SIDE DITCHES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS PER THE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL 6/GO.5 WITHIN THE
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE.
3. ALL ROADSIDE DITCHES PROPOSED WITH THIS EROSION & SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN SHALL HAVE FIBER CHECK DAMS AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL 5/GO.5. FIBER CHECK DAMS SHALL BE SPACED PER THE
TABLE SHOWN IN DETAIL 2/G2.16. .
4. CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT ALL TERMINATING ENDS OF THE ROADSIDE
DITCHES SHALL BE ROCK CHECK DAMS PER DETAIL 5/G2.15. A
FIBER CHECK DAM SHALL BE SET 15' UPSTREAM OF THE ROCK
CHECK DAM FOR ADDED PROTECTION.
5. ONCE FINAL GRADING AND STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, APPLY
PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURES PER DETAIL 6/GO.5. THE
"PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE" SHOWN SHALL BE USED IN ALL
AREAS OUTSIDE THE INDICATED WETLAND AREAS AND STREAM BANKS.
THE "RIPARIAN SEED MIX" SHALL BE APPLIED IN WETLANDS AND
ALONG STREAM BANKS.
TOWN OF BOONS
DB: 1425 PG. 405
A PORTION OF
PIN: 2942- 68- 6039- 000
LOT 1
4J5,595 SQ. FT.
10.00 ACRES
5ON"I
35 Si
sR.
...... ----- ----
...... . ...............
REMOVE SILT FENCE AS
�k RN, f� NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION
�� f ;� OF INTAKE GALLERY, ;v �--'" -°
_ REPLACE AT THE END OF - -'
EACH WORK DAY
56Ei _ f
U
�� \\ (,n
i _
Ty
WA UGA -ONTY U
ASNE
i
i
i
i LL
i
i
vN Q
.yN N
N G W
z
APPROX. LOCATION
r OF RIVER TRANSITION
FROM CLASS IV TO
CLASS C
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2
STA 22 +00 TO 30 +90
Z
CD
W
D
Q
G2.1
2.17
TEMP. SILT FENCE,
SEE DETAIL 2/GO.6
(PHASE 1 & 2)
- -- - _...
--
TEMPORARY ROCK
` \
CHECK DAM AT
END OF DITCH,
SEE DETAIL
5ON"I
35 Si
sR.
...... ----- ----
...... . ...............
REMOVE SILT FENCE AS
�k RN, f� NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION
�� f ;� OF INTAKE GALLERY, ;v �--'" -°
_ REPLACE AT THE END OF - -'
EACH WORK DAY
56Ei _ f
U
�� \\ (,n
i _
Ty
WA UGA -ONTY U
ASNE
i
i
i
i LL
i
i
vN Q
.yN N
N G W
z
APPROX. LOCATION
r OF RIVER TRANSITION
FROM CLASS IV TO
CLASS C
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 80'
1" = 40' HORIZONTAL
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2
STA 22 +00 TO 30 +90
Z
CD
W
D
Q
G2.1
2.17

N J
2 Q
Z
~ Y �
o�0
o
F( -OZ
z�Q
Fw2
z cn
0z3
U O
LL, U 0 Ld
2 Z Y
W [if
W�Q
C)
W 3F-
LO Z
� � W
r0�
02D
� U
OHO
U
U K =
00-
Q
0 LW
Of
pz11
W 7p
SC) OW
w3w�
Ld
�o
z
_: L,
KU WO]
J p O
Q U ~
0
U F-
J
Z p p Lj
C; V)
O r U
48 LL, n
Z
Ld C)
O W O
(n J
Y � Q
Up U)
C) V)
Y O U W
F_ U)
MOZ
0
F- - 4s W
�wz�
j O Q
000?
a. C)
NOTES:
1. THE LABEL "CULVERT P -1" NOTED THROUGHOUT THIS PLAN SET REFERS TO THE COMBINATION OF CULVERTS P -1A & P -1B
THAT ARE BOTH DETAILED ON THIS SHEET.
2. THE RCBC UNITS SHALL BE CAREFULLY POSITIONED ON THE PREPARED FOUNDATION.
3. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN DURING BACKFILL AND COMPACTION TO MAINTAIN ALIGNMENT AND PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE
JOINTS. UNITS THAT BECOME MISALIGNED, SHOW EXCESSIVE SETTLEMENT OR HAVE OTHERWISE BEEN DAMAGED BY THE
CONTRACTOR'S OPERATION SHALL, AT THE DISCRETION OF THE OWNER, BE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR
AT NO COST TO THE TOWN OF BOONE.
4. THE 11'X10' RCBC SHALL BE FILLED 1 FOOT WITH SOIL AND CHANNEL BED MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM THE EXISTING
CHANNEL BED AS SHOWN ON THE DETAILS ON THIS SHEET.
5. ALL TRENCHING OPERATIONS SHALL MEET OSHA STANDARDS.
6. A MINIMUM OF 24" FROM OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CULVERT TO SIDE OF TRENCH MUST BE ALLOWED FOR COMPACTION OF
FILL MATERIAL. BACKFILLING OF TRENCHES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE CULVERT IS LAID. THE FILL
AROUND THE PIPE SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 6 ". UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL WATER BE
PERMITTED TO RISE IN UNBACKFILLED TRENCHES AFTER THE CULVERT HAS BEEN PLACED. COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS
SHALL BE ATTAINED BY THE USE OF MECHANICAL TAMPS ONLY. EACH LAYER OF BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED LOOSE AND
THOROUGHLY COMPACTED INTO PLACE PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
7. THE DESIGN, DETAILS AND SHOP DRAWINGS FOR PRECAST 11'X10' RCBC, 11'X8' RCBC, FOOTINGS, WINGWALL FOOTINGS,
WINGWALLS AND ENDWALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. DESIGN OF THE WINGWALLS AND FOOTINGS SHALL
BE SIGNED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. SHOP DRAWINGS OF THESE ITEMS SHALL BE
SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
8. RCBC SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR HS20 -44 LOADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST VERSION OF AASHTO SPECIFICATOINS
WITH ALL SUBSEQUENT INTERIM SPECIFICATIONS.
9. APPLY GUARD RAIL ANCHORS AS SHOWN IN DETAIL 4/GO.6 FROM ACCESS ROAD STA 0 +47 TO 0 +73 ON TOP OF CULVERT
P -1.
10. PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT RCBC'S SHALL HAVE A STRUCTURAL OPENING OF A MINIMUM TOTAL OF 187 SQUARE FEET
(P -1A 99 SF & P -1B 88 SF) WHEN INVERT AND FOOTINGS ARE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS.
11. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPORT OF SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PREPARED BY S &ME FOR ALL SUBSURFACE
RECOMMENDATIONS. SEE S &ME PROJECT NO. 1351 -11 -010.
PROP. 58 LF OF,
HANDRAIL SEE
/ Ox /" /DETAIL 3/G2.15
x� P-1 / / '�x
r QY
NC GRID (NAD 83) I ^ /
A
HW -2 i
PROP. 64 LF OF
GUARD RAIL OFF
SET 12' (FACE OF
,2915 ! ' � Q GUARD RAIL) FROM
ACCESS ROAD
CENTERLINE, SEE 40
DETAIL 1/130.7
r �� PROP. 58 LF
Jty� /i OF HANDRAIL
e SEE DETAIL
3/132.15 G at \ o•�
� S
w a
i
llxl 011,
r
i�
PROP. RIFFLE �ph�
GRADE, SEE i`1~
DETAIL o� \ c z F \ �' \xJC'�
P
�1/G2.16 (IV / 9�0 °'`� ��q0i°' P��<P�J�N
'QiC,y 5�0� 90 G
Q.
PROP. 64 LF OF \ \ \�
GUARD RAIL OFF
SET 12' (FACE OF 9�L 90:3 �° / \
f ; ; GUARD RAIL) FROM / ��O Fq X90 /
y ACCESS ROAD `
CENTERLINE, SEE / Fiji F
q
DETAIL 1/GO.7
° CULVERT P -1 PLAN VIEW Go
PROP. 64 LF OF PROP. 64 LF OF GUARDRAIL
GUARDRAIL PER NCDOT PER NCDOT STD. 862.01
STD. 862.01 SEE DETAIL 1 /GO.7
SEE DETAIL 1 /GO.7 F,__PROPOSED GRADE
TOP OF ENDWALL
ELEV = 2915.50
HEADWALL -2 (HW -2) UPSTREAM ELEVATION
NTS
,d1-\ TnP nF FNnWAI i
3.0' MIN. J
I IL/--\L/ VV/-NLL I �I I YY I J V V YYI V J 1 1 \L_"IyI LL.L V /-\ I I VI V 1j. %j IVUI V.
0
NTS
PROP. 64 LF OF GUARDRAIL
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR_DETAILS.DWG
WK
D I C KSO
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
PER NCDOT STD. 862.01
PROP. 64 LF OF GUARDRAIL
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
SEE DETAIL
1 GO.7
R NCDOT
STD.
2922
292:
DETAIL-
L/GG-7-
ROPOS
D GRADE
)
w
�
U)
U)
-I
to
2920
292i,
rnU�
N�
La
UJ 04
W
N
=
=
LLI wv)
Q it
w
w
U) MQ
-
II
3
-
2918
Q
°w
'
i +LZ
CL
I I¢ -aa-
m
3
X:
i-a!
�o*p� ®o
�® o'"Fp�•+.d!�3tR''�a.��'�p:�
®«*'
ov)F-w
I
� I
I
• •
:
-
r�
: � ;'
u
u
•
4
•• I
PROP.
58 L
OF
PROP.
56 LF
F
2914
291,
A
ATTACHED
0
ATTACHED
TO
Z
DETAIL
1
3/132.1
DET
IL 3/G2.15
NMI
291:
2912
is ;::
EX_GROUND
3
UN
2910
ZOUND
f
P R
G OUND
PROP.
42 L
OF 11'
8'
SEE
THIS SHEET
FC
R
•�•
.
:• !u
.,•
••
2904
2904
290,
MOM
2902!
2902
290:
•0
_
,�
TOP OF ENDWALL
ELEV = 2915.50
HEADWALL -2 (HW -2) UPSTREAM ELEVATION
NTS
,d1-\ TnP nF FNnWAI i
3.0' MIN. J
I IL/--\L/ VV/-NLL I �I I YY I J V V YYI V J 1 1 \L_"IyI LL.L V /-\ I I VI V 1j. %j IVUI V.
0
NTS
0 +00 0 +50 1+00 1+50 0 +00 0 +50 1+00
CULVERT P -1 A PROFILE CULVERT P-113 PROFILE
20 0 20 40 4 0 4 8
SCALE: 1:" = 20' GRAPHIC SCALE SCALE: I" = 4'
HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
PROP. 64 LF OF GUARDRAIL
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR_DETAILS.DWG
WK
D I C KSO
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
PER NCDOT STD. 862.01
PROP. 64 LF OF GUARDRAIL
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
SEE DETAIL
1 GO.7
R NCDOT
STD.
862.01
DETAIL-
L/GG-7-
ROPOS
D GRADE
)
-
U)
U)
-I
to
wM
rnU�
N�
La
UJ 04
W
N
=
=
LLI wv)
Q it
w
w
U) MQ
-
II
3
-
�Z
Q
°w
'
i +LZ
CL
I I¢ -aa-
m
3
X:
i-a!
ov)F-w
4
PROP.
58 L
OF
PROP.
56 LF
F
A
ATTACHED
0
ATTACHED
TO
Z
DETAIL
1
3/132.1
DET
IL 3/G2.15
71"�'7777::
is ;::
EX_GROUND
3
UN
ZOUND
f
P R
G OUND
PROP.
42 L
OF 11'
8'
SEE
THIS SHEET
FC
R
0 +00 0 +50 1+00 1+50 0 +00 0 +50 1+00
CULVERT P -1 A PROFILE CULVERT P-113 PROFILE
20 0 20 40 4 0 4 8
SCALE: 1:" = 20' GRAPHIC SCALE SCALE: I" = 4'
HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
2922
2920
2918
2916
2914
2912
2910
2908
2906
2904
2902
2900
DATE ®
y s
2 SEAL
w
038086
;A EPP 'N `\e
.•
TOP OF WING
ELEV = 2911.00
CV
00 HEADWALL -1 (HW -1)
1-i
`1 DOWNSTREAM
STRUCTURE
TOP OF WING
ELEV = 2910.00
/
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
I
2T■0'
T
1 1 LMVI_ VVLYGI\ 1 VI• 11v.
57 STONE AS SHOWN
CULVERT SUBBASE DETAIL
NTS
V
CULVERT P -1A
PROP RCBC
PROP 12" THICK
CONCRETE BAFFLE
X-4- j
i
V 4
BAFFLE CONNECTION TO BE DETERMINE
BY PRECAST MANUFACTURER.
CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP
DRAWINGS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
CONCRETE BAFFLE DETAIL
N TS
TOP OF ENDWALL TOP OF ENDWALL'
ELEV = 2915.50 ELEV = 2915.50
CULVERT P -1A
PROP. 11'X10' RCBC
FOR NORMAL FLOW
CULVERT P-18
PROP. 11'X8' RCBC
FOR STORM EVENTS
-TOP OF ENDWALL TOP OF ENDWALL
ELEV = 2915.50 ELEV = 2915.50
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
F
tV
'9
HEADWALL -2 (HW -2) o0
UPSTREAM N
STRUCTURE
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
DETAILS
�I
1
2.0'
T
)N NO.
OWN
TOP OF WING
ELEV = 2911.00
TOP OF WING
ELEV = 2910.00
z
0
U
c l
In
z
0
U
0
L_
C)
LLJ
Q
L_L_J
0
z
U
U)
LEI
JI
Q
LL
2.1
2.17
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376AR_DETAILS.DWG
WK
D I C KSO
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
APPROVALS
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
2922
2920
2918
2916
2914
2912
2910
2908
2906
2904
2902
2900
DATE ®
y s
2 SEAL
w
038086
;A EPP 'N `\e
.•
TOP OF WING
ELEV = 2911.00
CV
00 HEADWALL -1 (HW -1)
1-i
`1 DOWNSTREAM
STRUCTURE
TOP OF WING
ELEV = 2910.00
/
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
I
2T■0'
T
1 1 LMVI_ VVLYGI\ 1 VI• 11v.
57 STONE AS SHOWN
CULVERT SUBBASE DETAIL
NTS
V
CULVERT P -1A
PROP RCBC
PROP 12" THICK
CONCRETE BAFFLE
X-4- j
i
V 4
BAFFLE CONNECTION TO BE DETERMINE
BY PRECAST MANUFACTURER.
CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP
DRAWINGS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
CONCRETE BAFFLE DETAIL
N TS
TOP OF ENDWALL TOP OF ENDWALL'
ELEV = 2915.50 ELEV = 2915.50
CULVERT P -1A
PROP. 11'X10' RCBC
FOR NORMAL FLOW
CULVERT P-18
PROP. 11'X8' RCBC
FOR STORM EVENTS
-TOP OF ENDWALL TOP OF ENDWALL
ELEV = 2915.50 ELEV = 2915.50
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
F
tV
'9
HEADWALL -2 (HW -2) o0
UPSTREAM N
STRUCTURE
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
DETAILS
�I
1
2.0'
T
)N NO.
OWN
TOP OF WING
ELEV = 2911.00
TOP OF WING
ELEV = 2910.00
z
0
U
c l
In
z
0
U
0
L_
C)
LLJ
Q
L_L_J
0
z
U
U)
LEI
JI
Q
LL
2.1
2.17

� J
s a
Z
� Y �
03F,
WO
F_
Z Q
WW=
zcnr_
0 z 3:
U O
w U 0
= Z Y
w < LLI
W F_ Q
w31�
W
�0�
O =O
0n
P Cf)
D<
o
O a W
Of z0
L'i d J Ld
wo Q W
0za
�
W U O
J O U
LLI O W
w�W�
V)
Of
�e
�OJ
Z Q
_,L,>
J¢U F � W m Ld
JO._0 OO
0
U ~'z�
?OOo
W
o(f)oz
U ZO L- OU
� W W
m
z, M
ow0J
N 0 J
Y d Q
U 0 S
o co
Z
Y 0 Z W
_ Zo
-o
O ° °Q
= ~sir
oF-
y F-
U)
d U Y Z
OOUO
UC) 0(n
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
NOTES:
1. A MINIMUM OF 24" FROM OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE TO SIDE OF TRENCH
MUST BE ALLOWED FOR COMPACTION OF FILL MATERIAL. BACKFILLING OF
TRENCHES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE PIPE IS LAID.
THE FILL AROUND THE PIPE SHALL BE PLACED IN . LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED
6 ". UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL WATER BE PERMITTED TO RISE IN
UNBACKFILLED TRENCHES AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN PLACED.
COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE ATTAINED BY THE USE OF
MECHANICAL TAMPS ONLY. EACH AND EVERY LAYER OF BACKFILL SHALL
BE PLACED LOOSE AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED INTO PLACE.
2. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL HAVE AN IN PLACE COMPACTED DENSITY OF
95% STANDARD PROCTOR. THE FINAL 2' BELOW FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE
100% STANDARD PROCTOR.
3. ALL TRENCHING OPERATIONS SHALL MEET OSHA STANDARDS.
4. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL BENEATH ROADWAY SHALL BE SELECT MATERIAL
( NCDOT CLASS 111, TYPE 2). EXCAVATED MATERIAL THAT MEETS OR
EXCEEDS THAT STANDARD SHALL BE USED WHERE AVAILABLE. IN AREAS
OUTSIDE THE ROADWAY, BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL.
CULVERT TRENCHING DETAIL
NTS
PROPOSED ROADSIDE
"V" DITCH (SEE
GRADING PLAN FOR
LOCATIONS, & DETAIL
1/G2.17 FOR THE
TYPICAL SECTION)
A
i
A
GRADING IN FILL OF ROADWAY 26.0'
SHALL BE PER EMBANKMENT
SPECIFICATIONS, SEE NOTE 2 20.0'
LOCATED WITHIN THIS DETAIL
COMPACTED 8" OF
APPLY SEEDING PER NCDOT ABC STONE
SCHEDULE SHOWN ON
DETAIL 6/G0.5 APPLY SEEDING PER
3' SHOULDER 10.0' 10.0' 3' SHOULDER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON
BEGIN 2' UNDERCUT OF DETAIL 6/GO.5
EXISTING GRADE AT
CUT /FILL LINE
e
EXISTING
GRADE
I I M I I I `MAXIMUM SLOPE BASED
8.0% 2.6% SLOPE 2.6% SLOPE
Ed I I III ON OSHA STANDARDS
i l l_I OUTSIDE DIAMETER III-
�IIII IIIlIII'
IIIIII
BEGIN 2 UNDERCUT OF
rp- iVARIES COMPACTED APPROVED
NOTE:
(18 MIN) EXCAVATED MATERIAL OR
SELECT MATERIAL ( NCDOT
24" 24 CLASS III, TYPE 2)
EXISTING GRADE AT
CIRCULAR RCP PLACE PIPE ON SUITABLE
1. THE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DETAIL SHOWN REPRESENTS THE
EXISTING MATERIAL OR
DITCHES ARE NOT
FOUNDATION CONDITIONING
ENGINEER'S INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 4.4, OPTION 2 OF THE
MATERIAL PER NCDOT STANDARDS
SUITABLE FOR
(SEE NOTES FOR SELECT
a
MATERIAL CLASS) AND /OR AS
RE -USE AS FILL.
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
NOTES:
1. A MINIMUM OF 24" FROM OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE TO SIDE OF TRENCH
MUST BE ALLOWED FOR COMPACTION OF FILL MATERIAL. BACKFILLING OF
TRENCHES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE PIPE IS LAID.
THE FILL AROUND THE PIPE SHALL BE PLACED IN . LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED
6 ". UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL WATER BE PERMITTED TO RISE IN
UNBACKFILLED TRENCHES AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN PLACED.
COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE ATTAINED BY THE USE OF
MECHANICAL TAMPS ONLY. EACH AND EVERY LAYER OF BACKFILL SHALL
BE PLACED LOOSE AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED INTO PLACE.
2. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL HAVE AN IN PLACE COMPACTED DENSITY OF
95% STANDARD PROCTOR. THE FINAL 2' BELOW FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE
100% STANDARD PROCTOR.
3. ALL TRENCHING OPERATIONS SHALL MEET OSHA STANDARDS.
4. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL BENEATH ROADWAY SHALL BE SELECT MATERIAL
( NCDOT CLASS 111, TYPE 2). EXCAVATED MATERIAL THAT MEETS OR
EXCEEDS THAT STANDARD SHALL BE USED WHERE AVAILABLE. IN AREAS
OUTSIDE THE ROADWAY, BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL.
CULVERT TRENCHING DETAIL
NTS
PROPOSED ROADSIDE
"V" DITCH (SEE
GRADING PLAN FOR
LOCATIONS, & DETAIL
1/G2.17 FOR THE
TYPICAL SECTION)
A
i
A
GRADING IN FILL OF ROADWAY 26.0'
SHALL BE PER EMBANKMENT
SPECIFICATIONS, SEE NOTE 2 20.0'
LOCATED WITHIN THIS DETAIL
COMPACTED 8" OF
APPLY SEEDING PER NCDOT ABC STONE
SCHEDULE SHOWN ON
DETAIL 6/G0.5 APPLY SEEDING PER
3' SHOULDER 10.0' 10.0' 3' SHOULDER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON
BEGIN 2' UNDERCUT OF DETAIL 6/GO.5
EXISTING GRADE AT
CUT /FILL LINE
e
EXISTING
GRADE
B
i
Q
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ATTACHMENT OF HANDRAIL FENCE
TO TOP OF WINGWALLS.
2. TYPE OF PIPE TO BE USED IS 1 -5/8" MAX. O.D. BLACK IRON, LOW CARBON
PIPE.
3. ALL JOINTS TO HAVE A 1/2- FILLET WELD AT ALL JOINTS.
4. AFTER INSTALLATION PAINT ASSMBLY WITH BLACK ALL WEATHER ENAMEL.
3 TWO RAIL HANDRAIL DETAIL
NTS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE \\��►1IIItJ ���i
RWH AS SHOWN HICKORY, NC 28602 f
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE �K (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS \� O` ® ®�
RAB MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE
NO. F -0374
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING
JPK 80376.00.HI D I C KSO N Office Locations: � O'1• '
•• �
�.
CONSTRUCTION ...
FILE NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia s.�p ; 0380e8,6 i's. Lu a
80376AR_DETAILS.DWG South Carolina RECORD DWG.
BRPO�`�\
tlff��
BEGIN 2' UNDERCUT OF
EXISTING GRADE AT WIDTH VARIES (MIN. 20'), SEE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN SHEETS
CUT /FILL LINE �..
CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE COMPACTED 8" OF
POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY NCDOT ABC STONE
TOTAL HEIGHT VARIES,
SEE GRADING PLAN
SHEETS
FROM INTAKE BUILDING PROPOSED
GRADE
. . . . . Qa Oa Oa �a
3,1 a
. . . . .EXISTING GRADE
UNDERCUT EXISTING GRADE BY 2', REPLACE WITH FILL
2.0' MIN. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
PREPARED BY S &ME, PROJECT # 1351 -11 -010 j \ \j
BOTTOM OF UNDERCUT
WIDTH VARIES, SEE GRADING PLAN SHEETS
GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SECTION
NTS
NOTES
1. PLACE STONE TO THE LINE AND DIMENSION SHOWN IN THE PLAN ON A FILTER FABRIC
FOUNDATION.
2. KEEP THE CENTER STONE SECTION AT LEAST 9 INCHES BELOW NATURAL GROUND LEVEL
WHERE THE DAM ABUTS THE CHANNEL BANKS.
3. EXTEND STONE AT LEAST 1.5 FEET BEYOND THE DITCH BANK TO KEEP WATER FROM CUTTING
AROUND THE ENDS OF THE CHECK DAM.
4. SET SPACING BETWEEN DAMS TO ASSURE THAT THE ELEVATION AT THE TOP OF THE LOWER
DAM IS THE SAME AS THE TOE ELEVATION OF THE UPPER DAM.
12" OF NCDOT #5
OR #57 WASHED STONE 1.5'
CLASS B RIP -RA
moo° o
2' MAX AT
FILTER CLOTH �o p p C�c��A CENTER
4' TO 6'
CROSS - SECTION VIEW
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
BEGIN 2' UNDERCUT OF
EXISTING GRADE AT
CUT /FILL LINE
MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION AT LEAST WEEKLY AND
AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT (1/2 INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL
EVENT AND REPAIR IMMEDIATELY. CLEAN OUT SEDIMENT, STRAW,
LIMBS, OR OTHER DEBRIS THAT COULD CLOG THE CHANNEL
WHEN NEEDED.
ANTICIPATE SUBMERGENCE AND DEPOSITION ABOVE THE CHECK
DAM AND EROSION FROM HIGH FLOWS AROUND THE EDGES OF
THE DAM. CORRECT ALL DAMAGE IMMEDIATELY. IF SIGNIFICANT
EROSION OCCURS BETWEEN DAMS, ADDITIONAL MEASURE CAN BE
TAKEN SUCH, INSTALLING A PROTECTIVE RIPRAP LINER IN THAT
PORTION OF THE CHANNEL.
REMOVE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED BEHIND THE DAMS AS NEEDED
TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO CHANNEL VEGETATION, ALLOW THE
CHANNEL TO DRAIN THROUGH THE STONE CHECK DAM, AND
PREVENT LARGE FLOWS FORM CARRYING SEDIMENT OVER THE
DAM. ADD STONES TO DAMS AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN DESIGN
HEIGHT AND CROSS SECTION.
ROCK CHECK DAM DETAIL
NTS
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
DETAILS
z
0
U
z
0
U
0
W
cn
Q
W
LI
F,
0
_o
W
O
Q
z
1
2.1
2.17
. . . BOTTOM OF UNDERCUT.
8.0% 2.6% SLOPE 2.6% SLOPE
8-
PROPOSED
BEGIN 2 UNDERCUT OF
NOTE:
..-
--
GRADE
EXISTING GRADE AT
1. THE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DETAIL SHOWN REPRESENTS THE
DITCHES ARE NOT
DITCHES ARE NOT
STATION 0 +09 TO 30 +��
ENGINEER'S INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 4.4, OPTION 2 OF THE
CUT /FILL LINE
SUITABLE FOR
a
a:
RE -USE AS FILL.
1351 -11 -010. THE ROAD SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN OR AS
3'
.........
3�
2. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY S &ME, PROJECT NO.
TOTAL .HEIGHT VARIES,
TYPICAL ACCESS ROAD CROSS SECTION
FOR FILON RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN THE PROPOSED
EXISTING
SEE ROAD PROFILE ON
- G2.1
GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
GRADING SHEETS
UNDERCUT EXISTING GRADE BY 2', REPLACE WITH FILL
2.0' .MIN. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
. . . . . . .
. . . .
�\ \\
PREPARED BY S &ME, PROJECT # 1351 -11 -010
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
B
i
Q
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ATTACHMENT OF HANDRAIL FENCE
TO TOP OF WINGWALLS.
2. TYPE OF PIPE TO BE USED IS 1 -5/8" MAX. O.D. BLACK IRON, LOW CARBON
PIPE.
3. ALL JOINTS TO HAVE A 1/2- FILLET WELD AT ALL JOINTS.
4. AFTER INSTALLATION PAINT ASSMBLY WITH BLACK ALL WEATHER ENAMEL.
3 TWO RAIL HANDRAIL DETAIL
NTS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE \\��►1IIItJ ���i
RWH AS SHOWN HICKORY, NC 28602 f
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE �K (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS \� O` ® ®�
RAB MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE
NO. F -0374
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING
JPK 80376.00.HI D I C KSO N Office Locations: � O'1• '
•• �
�.
CONSTRUCTION ...
FILE NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia s.�p ; 0380e8,6 i's. Lu a
80376AR_DETAILS.DWG South Carolina RECORD DWG.
BRPO�`�\
tlff��
BEGIN 2' UNDERCUT OF
EXISTING GRADE AT WIDTH VARIES (MIN. 20'), SEE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN SHEETS
CUT /FILL LINE �..
CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE COMPACTED 8" OF
POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY NCDOT ABC STONE
TOTAL HEIGHT VARIES,
SEE GRADING PLAN
SHEETS
FROM INTAKE BUILDING PROPOSED
GRADE
. . . . . Qa Oa Oa �a
3,1 a
. . . . .EXISTING GRADE
UNDERCUT EXISTING GRADE BY 2', REPLACE WITH FILL
2.0' MIN. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
PREPARED BY S &ME, PROJECT # 1351 -11 -010 j \ \j
BOTTOM OF UNDERCUT
WIDTH VARIES, SEE GRADING PLAN SHEETS
GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SECTION
NTS
NOTES
1. PLACE STONE TO THE LINE AND DIMENSION SHOWN IN THE PLAN ON A FILTER FABRIC
FOUNDATION.
2. KEEP THE CENTER STONE SECTION AT LEAST 9 INCHES BELOW NATURAL GROUND LEVEL
WHERE THE DAM ABUTS THE CHANNEL BANKS.
3. EXTEND STONE AT LEAST 1.5 FEET BEYOND THE DITCH BANK TO KEEP WATER FROM CUTTING
AROUND THE ENDS OF THE CHECK DAM.
4. SET SPACING BETWEEN DAMS TO ASSURE THAT THE ELEVATION AT THE TOP OF THE LOWER
DAM IS THE SAME AS THE TOE ELEVATION OF THE UPPER DAM.
12" OF NCDOT #5
OR #57 WASHED STONE 1.5'
CLASS B RIP -RA
moo° o
2' MAX AT
FILTER CLOTH �o p p C�c��A CENTER
4' TO 6'
CROSS - SECTION VIEW
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
BEGIN 2' UNDERCUT OF
EXISTING GRADE AT
CUT /FILL LINE
MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION AT LEAST WEEKLY AND
AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT (1/2 INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL
EVENT AND REPAIR IMMEDIATELY. CLEAN OUT SEDIMENT, STRAW,
LIMBS, OR OTHER DEBRIS THAT COULD CLOG THE CHANNEL
WHEN NEEDED.
ANTICIPATE SUBMERGENCE AND DEPOSITION ABOVE THE CHECK
DAM AND EROSION FROM HIGH FLOWS AROUND THE EDGES OF
THE DAM. CORRECT ALL DAMAGE IMMEDIATELY. IF SIGNIFICANT
EROSION OCCURS BETWEEN DAMS, ADDITIONAL MEASURE CAN BE
TAKEN SUCH, INSTALLING A PROTECTIVE RIPRAP LINER IN THAT
PORTION OF THE CHANNEL.
REMOVE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED BEHIND THE DAMS AS NEEDED
TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO CHANNEL VEGETATION, ALLOW THE
CHANNEL TO DRAIN THROUGH THE STONE CHECK DAM, AND
PREVENT LARGE FLOWS FORM CARRYING SEDIMENT OVER THE
DAM. ADD STONES TO DAMS AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN DESIGN
HEIGHT AND CROSS SECTION.
ROCK CHECK DAM DETAIL
NTS
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
DETAILS
z
0
U
z
0
U
0
W
cn
Q
W
LI
F,
0
_o
W
O
Q
z
1
2.1
2.17
. . . BOTTOM OF UNDERCUT.
WIDTH VARIES, SEE GRADING PLAN SHEETS
/ / \ / / \/
N/`
PROPOSED ROADSIDE
"V" DITCH (SEE
GRADING PLAN
LOCATIONS, & DETAIL
1/G2.17 FOR THE
NOTE:
TYPICAL SECTION)
CUT SOILS FROM
CUT SOILS FROM
GRAVEL SECTION
ROADSIDE "V"
ROADSIDE "V"
1. THE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DETAIL SHOWN REPRESENTS THE
DITCHES ARE NOT
DITCHES ARE NOT
STATION 0 +09 TO 30 +��
ENGINEER'S INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 4.4, OPTION 2 OF THE
SUITABLE FOR
SUITABLE FOR
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PREPARED BY S &ME, PROJECT NO.
RE -USE AS FILL.
RE -USE AS FILL.
1351 -11 -010. THE ROAD SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN OR AS
RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION.
2. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY S &ME, PROJECT NO.
2
TYPICAL ACCESS ROAD CROSS SECTION
FOR FILON RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN THE PROPOSED
EMBANKMENT
- G2.1
NTS
B
i
Q
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ATTACHMENT OF HANDRAIL FENCE
TO TOP OF WINGWALLS.
2. TYPE OF PIPE TO BE USED IS 1 -5/8" MAX. O.D. BLACK IRON, LOW CARBON
PIPE.
3. ALL JOINTS TO HAVE A 1/2- FILLET WELD AT ALL JOINTS.
4. AFTER INSTALLATION PAINT ASSMBLY WITH BLACK ALL WEATHER ENAMEL.
3 TWO RAIL HANDRAIL DETAIL
NTS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE \\��►1IIItJ ���i
RWH AS SHOWN HICKORY, NC 28602 f
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE �K (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS \� O` ® ®�
RAB MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE
NO. F -0374
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING
JPK 80376.00.HI D I C KSO N Office Locations: � O'1• '
•• �
�.
CONSTRUCTION ...
FILE NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia s.�p ; 0380e8,6 i's. Lu a
80376AR_DETAILS.DWG South Carolina RECORD DWG.
BRPO�`�\
tlff��
BEGIN 2' UNDERCUT OF
EXISTING GRADE AT WIDTH VARIES (MIN. 20'), SEE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN SHEETS
CUT /FILL LINE �..
CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE COMPACTED 8" OF
POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY NCDOT ABC STONE
TOTAL HEIGHT VARIES,
SEE GRADING PLAN
SHEETS
FROM INTAKE BUILDING PROPOSED
GRADE
. . . . . Qa Oa Oa �a
3,1 a
. . . . .EXISTING GRADE
UNDERCUT EXISTING GRADE BY 2', REPLACE WITH FILL
2.0' MIN. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
PREPARED BY S &ME, PROJECT # 1351 -11 -010 j \ \j
BOTTOM OF UNDERCUT
WIDTH VARIES, SEE GRADING PLAN SHEETS
GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SECTION
NTS
NOTES
1. PLACE STONE TO THE LINE AND DIMENSION SHOWN IN THE PLAN ON A FILTER FABRIC
FOUNDATION.
2. KEEP THE CENTER STONE SECTION AT LEAST 9 INCHES BELOW NATURAL GROUND LEVEL
WHERE THE DAM ABUTS THE CHANNEL BANKS.
3. EXTEND STONE AT LEAST 1.5 FEET BEYOND THE DITCH BANK TO KEEP WATER FROM CUTTING
AROUND THE ENDS OF THE CHECK DAM.
4. SET SPACING BETWEEN DAMS TO ASSURE THAT THE ELEVATION AT THE TOP OF THE LOWER
DAM IS THE SAME AS THE TOE ELEVATION OF THE UPPER DAM.
12" OF NCDOT #5
OR #57 WASHED STONE 1.5'
CLASS B RIP -RA
moo° o
2' MAX AT
FILTER CLOTH �o p p C�c��A CENTER
4' TO 6'
CROSS - SECTION VIEW
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
BEGIN 2' UNDERCUT OF
EXISTING GRADE AT
CUT /FILL LINE
MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION AT LEAST WEEKLY AND
AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT (1/2 INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL
EVENT AND REPAIR IMMEDIATELY. CLEAN OUT SEDIMENT, STRAW,
LIMBS, OR OTHER DEBRIS THAT COULD CLOG THE CHANNEL
WHEN NEEDED.
ANTICIPATE SUBMERGENCE AND DEPOSITION ABOVE THE CHECK
DAM AND EROSION FROM HIGH FLOWS AROUND THE EDGES OF
THE DAM. CORRECT ALL DAMAGE IMMEDIATELY. IF SIGNIFICANT
EROSION OCCURS BETWEEN DAMS, ADDITIONAL MEASURE CAN BE
TAKEN SUCH, INSTALLING A PROTECTIVE RIPRAP LINER IN THAT
PORTION OF THE CHANNEL.
REMOVE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED BEHIND THE DAMS AS NEEDED
TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO CHANNEL VEGETATION, ALLOW THE
CHANNEL TO DRAIN THROUGH THE STONE CHECK DAM, AND
PREVENT LARGE FLOWS FORM CARRYING SEDIMENT OVER THE
DAM. ADD STONES TO DAMS AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN DESIGN
HEIGHT AND CROSS SECTION.
ROCK CHECK DAM DETAIL
NTS
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
DETAILS
z
0
U
z
0
U
0
W
cn
Q
W
LI
F,
0
_o
W
O
Q
z
1
2.1
2.17

N J
2 Q
Z
~ Y 0
o�
F_
Wo
Q
W=
oo�
W
On
= Z Y
W Qf
WFQ
O
W 3
Z
= W
O O U
o3S
F- L
U _
DQ�
°O° W
xzo
�Ld
�QW
oza
W3O
O JF, U
j0OW
w3t W�
w
?F~
�o
OJ
Z Q
2 >
UC)(n W
0�UWO]
J�OU
Lj
Lj
U ~ J x
Z000
oo0
,o
�WmW
z 2 m
W O
0
J
Y � Q
Z ^J
Y O U W
3F_ zV)
n
OUQOUQ
w F-
rev)
OOU0
Uooin
OW I ivm yr oruvr\ I
EROSION CONTROL
LINER
OF BANK
65' -0"
A
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL PLAN VIEW
-TOP OF RIFFLE
(SEE PROFILE FLOW so
FOR DESIGN ELEV.)
-_- SLOPE VARIES DESIGN BED
(SEE PROFILE)
SURFACE
O O °
O o °°
�O �O
O O
FILTER O
FABRIC O
GRAVEL SUBSTRATE
50 / 50 MIX OF CLASS A
RIP RAP AND # 5 STONE GRADE CONTROL ROCK
50 / 50 MIX CLASS A / B
RIP RAP
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL - PROFILE B -B
30' -0"
BANKFULL ELEVATION
BOTTOM OF RIFFLE
(SEE PROFILE FOR
DESIGN ELEV.)
r- 0.5'
1 2.5' MIN
[IN
1 1.75' MIN
EROSION CONTROL
LINER
BANKFULL ELEVATION
1.75' MIN. INVERT SET AT PROFILE
�- GRADE
FILTER 0 `�
FABRIC N
REVISIONS
GRAVEL SUBSTRATE J
50 / 50 MIX OF CLASS A RIP
RAP AND # 5 STONE GRADE CONTROL ROCK
50 / 50 MIX CLASS A / B RIP RAP
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL - SECTION A -A
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
G2.2 G2.1 NTS
0
o r
ROADSIDE DRAINAGE DITCHES INVERTS & SLOPES
RD STATION
OFFSET LEFT
FOR DITCH CL
ACCESS ROAD
CENTERLINE STA77ON
DIAMETER
OF PIPE
(IN.)
APRON
LENGTH
(FT.)
APRON
WIDTH 3Do
(FT.)
APRON
WIDTH W
(FT.)
DITCH ID
DITCH ID
RD CL STA. START
RD CL STA. END
DITCH LENGTH
INVERT UP
INVERT
DOWN
SLOPE
(FT.)
(FT.)
(FT.)
(FT.)
(FT.)
(FT.)
N
L1
0 +90
3 +21
199.8
2907.00
2905.15
0.93
L2
3 +21
6 +75
378.5
2908.00
2905.15
0.75
L3
6 +75
7 +42
164.1
2908.00
2906.00
1.22
L4
7 +62
8 +49
100.0
2909.20
2906.00
3.20
L5
8 +49
9 +62
122.4
2909.20
2907.50
1.39
L6
9 +62
11 +00
145.5
2909.20
2907.50
1.17
L7
11 +00
11 +52
52.6
2909.20
2907.50
3.23
L8
11 +62
13 +50
186.1
2910.00
2908.00
1.07
L9
13 +50
14 +82
130.8
2910.00
2909.00
0.76
L10
14 +82
21 +50
.667.9
2914.50
2909.00
0.82
L11
21 +50
22 +82
128.2
2914.50
2912.80
1.33
L12
22 +89
29 +83
709.5
2919.50
2912.80
0.94
L13
29 +83
OUTFALL
208.1
2919.50
2914.50
2.40
FIBER ROLL
DIA.
MAX. CHECK DAM
SPACING
(FT.)
(FT.)
N
(FT.)
RD STATION
OFFSET RIGHT
FOR DITCH CL
R1
0 +97
3 +22
0.93
1
107
DITCH ID
RD CL STA. START
RD CL STA. END
DITCH LENGTH
- INVERT UP
INVERT
DOWN
SLOPE
6 +94
(FT.)
(FT.)
(FT.)
(FT.)
(FT.)
N
R1
0 +97
3 +22
259.8
2907.00
2904.58
0.93
R2
3 +22
6 +32
294.7
2907.00
2904.58
0.82
R3
6 +94
9 +58
247.8
2908.00
2905.00
1.21
R4
10 +36
12 +65
229.7
2910.00
2908.00
0.87
R5
12 +86
19 +70
687.6
2914.00
2908.00
0.87
R6
20 +32
22 +90
263.3
2915.00
2913.00
0.76
R7
22 +90
29 +83
676.4
2919.50
2913.00
0.96
NOTES:
1. SEE DETAIL 6/G0.5 FOR TEMPORARY & PERMANENT SEEDING
SCHEDULE THAT SHALL BE APPLIED TO ROADSIDE DITCHES.
2. SEE DETAIL 4/G2.16 FOR ROADSIDE DITCH CROSS - SECTION.
3. SEE DETAIL 5/GO.5 FOR TEMPORARY FIBER CHECK DAM INSTALLATION
AND MAINTENANCE INFORMATION.
4. SEE SHEETS G2.11 THROUGH G2.13 FOR GRADING PLAN WHICH SHOWS
THE LOCATION OF ALL DITCHES SHOWN WITHIN THIS DETAIL.
L.
ROADSIDE DRAINAGE DITCHES - FIBER CHECK DAM SPACING
RD STATION
OFFSET LEFT
FOR DITCH CL
ACCESS ROAD
CENTERLINE STA77ON
DIAMETER
OF PIPE
(IN.)
APRON
LENGTH
(FT.)
APRON
WIDTH 3Do
(FT.)
APRON
WIDTH W
(FT.)
DITCH ID
RD CL STA.
START
RD CL
STA. END
SLOPE
FIBER ROLL
DIA.
MAX. CHECK DAM
SPACING
P -2
(FT.)
(FT.)
N
(FT.)
(FT.)
L1
0 +90
3 +21
0.93
1
108
L2
3 +21
6 +75
0.75
1
133
L3
6 +75
7 +42
1.22
1
82
L4
7 +62
8 +49
3.20
1
31
L5
8 +49
9 +62
1.39
1
72
L6
9 +62
11 +00
1.17
1
86
L7
11 +00
11 +52
3.23
1
31
L8
11 +62
13 +50
1.07
1
93
L9
13 +50
14 +82
0.76
1
131
L10
14 +82
21 +50
0.82
1
121
L11
21 +50
22 +82
1.33
1
75
L12
22 +89
29 +83
0.94
1
106
L13
29 +83
OUTFALL
2.40
1
42
- G2.1 NTS z
L_
RD STATION
OFFSET RIGHT
FOR DITCH CL
DITCH ID
RD CL STA.
START
RD CL
STA. END
SLOPE
FIBER ROLL
DIA.
MAX. CHECK DAM
SPACING
(FT.)
(FT.)
N
(FT.)
(FT.)
R1
0 +97
3 +22
0.93
1
107
R2
3 +22
6 +32
0.82
1
122
R3
6 +94
9 +58
1.21
1
83
R4
10 +36
12 +65
0.87
1
115
R5
12 +86
19 +70
0.87
1
115
R6
1 20 +32
22 +90
0.76
1
1 132
R7
1 22 +90
29 +83
0.96
1
1 104
ROADSIDE DRAINAGE DITCHES SCHEDULE
NOTES:
1. LA IS LENGTH OF RIPRAP APRON.
2. A FILTER BLANKET OR FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE
INSTALLED BETWEEN RIP -RAP & IN -SITU SOILS.
3. IN A WELL DEFINED CHANNEL, EXTEND THE APRON UP
THE CHANNEL BANKS TO AN ELEVATION 6" ABOVE
W MAXIMUM TAILWATER DEPTH OR TO TOP OF BANK,
WHICHEVER IS LESS.
SECTION A -A
To
�lNr%V�L FILTER
OR FILTER FABRIC
MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT RIPRAP OUTLET STRUCTURES WEEKLY
AND AFTER SIGNIFICANT (1/2 INCH OR GREATER)
RAINFALL EVENTS TO SEE IF ANY EROSION
AROUND OR BELOW THE RIPRAP HAS TAKEN
PLACE, OR IF STONES HAVE BEEN DISLODGED.
IMMEDIATELY MAKE ALL NEEDED REPAIRS TO
PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE.
STRUCTURE
OR
LINE
ACCESS ROAD
CENTERLINE STA77ON
DIAMETER
OF PIPE
(IN.)
APRON
LENGTH
(FT.)
APRON
WIDTH 3Do
(FT.)
APRON
WIDTH W
(FT.)
APRON
THICKNESS
(IN.)
RIP -RAP
CLASS
REMARKS
P -1
0 +60
SEE RIFFLE GRADE DETAIL, THIS SHEET
P -2
3 +22
24
6.0
6.0
8
12
CLASS B
RIP -RAP
P -3
7 +17
48
12.0
12.0
120
18
CLASS B
EX7FND RIP -RAP TO TOP OF BANKS
P -4
12+17
30
75
75
7.5
18
CLASS B
EX7FND RIP -RAP TO ELEV 2909, BOTH SIDES OF CHANNEL
P -5
22+89
18
9
4.5
10
12
CLASS B
RIP -RAP
RIP-RAP APRON AT PIPE OUTLETS
f NTS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE
RWH AS SHOWN HICKORY, NC 28602
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE EbWK (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE NO. F -0374 •:
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER DICKSON BIDDING 2e % ••9 ",
JPK 80376.00.HI Office Locations:
CONSTRUCTION 038086
FILE NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia t� � 1S
80376AR- DETAILS.DWG South Carolina RECORD DWG. i� .A, - '�� •�.�
t!!
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
DETAILS
2.1
n2.17
LINE WITH EROSION EXISTING
CONTROL MATTING, GROUND
Z
SEE DETAIL 1 /GO.6
O
O
O
PROPOSED "V" O
DITCH, SEE PLANS O
FOR TOTAL DEPTHS
NOTES: O
1. ROADSIDE DITCHES SHALL BE LOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. O
2. REMOVE AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL TREES, BRUSH, STUMPS, AND OTHER
OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL..
3. ENSURE THAT THE CONSTRUCTED CROSS SECTION MEETS ALL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. O
W
4. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL MATTING AS SHOWN IN DETAIL 1/GO.6 ALONG ALL
O)
PROPOSED DITCHES.
O
5. IMMEDIATELY SEED AND STABILIZE THE DITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEEDING
SCHEDULE SHOWN SHEET GO.5. W
O
6. PLACE TEMPORARY FIBER CHECK DAMS ALONG THE DIVERSION DITCHES AS SHOWN
10
ON DETAIL 5/GO.5.
O
MAINTENANCE:
I-
DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, CHECK GRASS -LINED CHANNELS AFTER EVERY O
RAINFALL. AFTER GRASS IS ESTABLISHED, PERIODICALLY CHECK THE CHANNEL; CHECK IT
AFTER EVERY HEAVY RAINFALL EVENT. IMMEDIATELY MAKE REPAIRS. IT IS PARTICULARLY Z
IMPORTANT TO CHECK THE CHANNEL OUTLET AND ALL ROAD CROSSINGS FOR BANK
STABILITY AND EVIDENCE OF PIPING OR SCOUR HOLES. REMOVE ALL SIGNIFICANT SEDIMENT
ACCUMULATIONS TO MAINTAIN THE DESIGNED CARRYING CAPACITY. KEEP THE GRASS IN A
HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION AT ALL TIMES, SINCE IT IS THE PRIMARY EROSION
PROTECTION FOR THE CHANNEL.
Z
INSPECT CHANNELS AT REGULAR INTERVALS AS WELL AS AFTER MAJOR RAINS AND MAKE
O
REPAIRS PROMPTLY. GIVE SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE OUTLET AND INLET SECTIONS AND
OTHER POINTS WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOW ENTERS. CAREFULLY CHECK STABILITY AT ROAD
UO
CROSSINGS AND LOOK FOR INDICATIONS OF PIPING, SCOUR HOLES OR BANK FAILURES. MAKE
REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATION ADJACENT TO THE CHANNEL IN A W
HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION TO PROTECT THE AREA FROM EROSION AND SCOUR DURING
OUT -OF -BANK FLOW.
4 ROADSIDE DITCH Q
- G2.1 NTS z
L_
ACCESS ROAD & INTAKE SITE
DETAILS
2.1
n2.17

� J
_ ¢
F-- Y
Z ¢
L'iW=
0 z j�:
U O
w U Ld
= Z Y
w Of
H Q
0��
Uj
(n z
w
0 U
0
F- F2 V)
U j)f _
O d ~
�Z0
w J af
Q W
0za
w90
LLi p J U
j

N
�YV
WVW
€Z�
ii
I
1
I I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
' I
1
1
1
1
i I
i
i I
1
i (
1
I I
i
i
-{ 1
HO�O 1
N� 1
zp
COFFER DAM ' I
W SEE DETAIL ' L;
I
N4 1/G2:17
�Soa i L'
1 )
1
1
1
i C.
WALLS
SEE DETAILS 2i
,
I
1
J � I
Z ' I
1 � I
' l
i
1
i
i
,
a
i `��. I1
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
RAW
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
DRAWN BY
I G
2
�
2 -18 -15
1
INFILTRATION GALLERY NOTES. REVISED
11/6/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
80376.00.HI
a
/
80376 -PVMP STATION - SITE- YINALOW
u
••
e
1 1
I
Am
,
•
�i
�
III
G♦
W
X01
•
b1.
A�, ��
.� r�
+ IIi11�li ii
34'/
2.4 /
/16" RJ MJ 22.5'
j' ;EXISTING TREES, BUSHES / 16" RJ MJ 11.25' E
!AND SIGNIFICANT UNDER -1 1,3 TOTAL
I N ; I GROWTH IN AND ALONG t
N AREA OF CONSTRUCTION I
4" MJ 45'
ITO BE REMOVED AND
111 i PROPERLY DISPOSED OF I (4 TOTAL)
f i ;
!BY CONTRACTOR
I 7 7 I I I i i I I I
GO
� �
',,.•GOB/ _
.100
;r V
J D�
/ V i
f �
0011.,,�.
PROPOSED TEMP. SILT FENCE
\SEE DETA 2/G � /
y , IL
f ,
N: 928301.97'
/ E: 1245470.28'
\� N
SEE ACCESS ROAD PLANS FOR 1
CONTIUATION OF GRADING AND LAYOUT
G2 SERIES DRAWINGS /
I /
/
/
/
/
TOM OF BOONE
j
/
DR., 1425 PG 405
' P F
EDGE OF
PERENNIAL
STREAM ,
A ORT10N 0
PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -000
LOT 1
435,595 50. F7
10.00 ACRES
C� () / C�4'j
I
/ o0
% oo^
r•/
1 �
NOTES:
1. TO ALTER THE THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF THE COFFER DAM FOR
THE INSTALLATION OF THE INFILTRATION
GALLERY, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A
DESIGN SEALED BY A NORTH CAROLINA'
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER FOR THE
ENGINEERS REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
ALTERING THE DESIGN WILL REQUIRE A
MODIFICATION TO PERMITS FROM
i . REGULATORY AGENCIES WHICH' MAY RESULT
/ IN A 60 -90 DAY APPROVAL PROCESS.
2. ENDANGERED MUSSELS HAVE BEEN FOUND
IN THE AREA OF THE INFILTRATION
GALLERY. THE OWNER' WILL REMOVE AND
RELOCATE SAID MUSSELS. CONTRACTOR
j SHALL NOT BEGIN WORK UNTIL MUSSELS
HAVE BEEN RELOCATED.
3. THE INTAKE COFFER' DAM AND INFILTRATION
GALLERY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BETWEEN
MAY 1, 2013 AND SEPTEMBER' 30, 2013.
PLAN VIEW: I "= 10'
Z� PROFILE: HORIZ: I 10'
VERT: I 10'
O
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
RAW
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
DRAWN BY
PROJECT DATE
PROJECT
2
ADDED COORDINATES FOR BUILDING AND INFILTRATION GALLERY
2 -18 -15
1
INFILTRATION GALLERY NOTES. REVISED
11/6/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
RAW
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
DRAWN BY
PROJECT DATE
PROJECT
WK
CONSTRUCTION
CADD
MARCH
- - --
DICKSON
APPROVED BY
-NUMBER
PRO�CT NUMBER
BLT
80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
community infrastructure consultants
80376 -PVMP STATION - SITE- YINALOW
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
H
V
h
t!i
Z
O
U
w
O
w
in
w
a
LU
J
W
F-
O
Z
a
Z
0
—
tn
w
a
.j
a
z
LL
_ 3700 •
RAW WATER INTAKE N2.
INFILTRATION GALLERY PLAN AND PROFILE N2,
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
BIDDING
- - --
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
CONSTRUCTION
—
RECORD DWG.
- - --
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
H
V
h
t!i
Z
O
U
w
O
w
in
w
a
LU
J
W
F-
O
Z
a
Z
0
—
tn
w
a
.j
a
z
LL
_ 3700 •
RAW WATER INTAKE N2.
INFILTRATION GALLERY PLAN AND PROFILE N2,

_N 4
�YV
�30
V 06*
WUW
LL
IN
°I-w
off'
U
08
oaf
°zo
do6z
0
js�zw �Fmw
x�a¢
s °tAN
YOUW
�F�ul
0
UQ$Q
V 00f7i
RIVER STONE NOTES:
1. STONE NOTED AS RIVER STONE SHALL BE WITHIN THE
SIZE RANGE INDICATED AND SPHERICAL IN SHAPE
WITH NO ANGULAR EDGES.
2. NO MORE THAN 5% OF THE STONE FURNISHED CAN
BE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM SIZE SPECIFIED NOR NO
MORE THAN 10% OF THE STONE CAN EXCEED THE
MAXIMUM SIZE SPECIFIED.
9' TALL GABION BASKET WALL __\
3'X3' UNITS' FILLED WITH CLASS B
RIP —RAP, SEE DETAIL 1/EN2.6
NORMAL RIVER WATER LEVEL
BACKFILL SURPLUS GABION BASKET WALL
EXCAVATION AREA WITH 3'X3' UNITS FILLED WITH 4" — 6"
CLASS 1 RIP -RAP RIVER STONE MATCHING EXISTING GRADE
OR EXCAVATED BOULDERS TOW ELEV 2906.28
OF EQUIVALENT SIZE
a
APPROXIMATE BED
ROCK ELEV 2900
SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
1' -0" MIN.
9'
12' TALL GABION BASKET WALL
3'X3' UNITS FILLED WITH CLASS B7\
RIP —RAP, SEE DETAIL 1 /EN2.6
r—EXISTING RIVER BED GRADE
X30 MIL GEOMEMBRANE HDPE LINER
EXTEND TO TOP OF GABION BASKET
6' -0" so IN 30' -0"
TYPICAL BANK STABILIZATION
SEE DETAIL 4/G0.7
LIVE STAKE PLANTINGS AND SEEDING
SEE DETAIL 5/GO.7
9' -0"
3" — 4" RIVER STONE BACKFILL
— 30 MIL GEOMEMBRANE HDPE LINER
EXTEND TO TOP OF GABION BASKET
ON ALL SIDES
—3/4" — 1 -1/2" RIVER STONE
INSTALLED 6" MIN. ABOVE
AND BELOW SCREEN PIPING
3' -0"
TYP. �I
3' -0"
TYP.
1/4" — 1/2" RIVER STONE
ABOVE HDPE LINER
SURROUNDING AIR MODULES
4" MJ 90' BEND, (TYP)
4" DIP AIR LINE, (TYP)
1' MIN SEPARATION
•16" DIP INTAKE LINE
TO PUMP STATION
TYP. OF 3
4" CL ELEV 2901.92
4" CL ELEV 2901.08
16" CL ELEV 2900.86
4" CL ELEV 2898.57
AIR MODULE CL ELEV 2898.53
PIPE AND FITTING LEGEND
NO.
ITEM DESCRIPTION
QTY.
1
16 "x8" FLG. SS TEE
18
2
8" RESTRAINED MJ DI 90' BEND
2
3
10 "x8" RESTRAINED MJ DI REDUCER
2
4
12 "x10" RESTRAINED MJ DI REDUCER
2
5
14 "x12" RESTRAINED MJ DI REDUCER
2
6
16 "x14" RESTRAINED MJ DI REDUCER
3
7
12 "x8" RESTRAINED MJ DI REDUCER
2
8
8" RESTRAINED MJ DI TEE
2
9
10 "x8" RESTRAINED MJ DI TEE
2
10
12 "x8" RESTRAINED MJ DI TEE
2
11
14" RESTRAINED MJ DI TEE
1
12
116 "x8" RESTRAINED MJ DI CROSS
2
13
14 "x8" RESTRAINED MJ DI CROSS
2
14
8" FLG. X PLAIN END DI PIPE
18
15
10" PLAIN END DI PIPE
4
16
12" PLAIN END DI PIPE
6
17
14" PLAIN END DI PIPE
7
18
16" PLAIN END DI PIPE
7
19
16" SS WEDGE WIRE SCREEN, FLG. BY CAP
END, 6' -3" OVERAL LENGTH
36
20
16" RESTRAINED MJ DI 90' BEND
2
21
8" PLAIN END DI PIPE
4
22
4" DI AIR PIPE, FLG. BY PLAIN END
8
23
4" SCH 10, 304 SS AIR PIPE
AR
24
304 SS AIR DISTRIBUTION MODULES
16
25
4" SCH 10, 304 SS 90' BEND, PER MANF.
AR
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH 1/4' =V -0"
DRAWN 8Y PROJECT DATE
■K' HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
�W,
APPROVALS
- - --
CADD MARCH 2015
APPROVED 8Y PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.Hi
FILE NAME
\
/�� NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
_Vi , v Office Locations:
W DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
.: 1
REVISED PIPE FITTINGS
2 -20-15
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH 1/4' =V -0"
DRAWN 8Y PROJECT DATE
■K' HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
�W,
APPROVALS
- - --
CADD MARCH 2015
APPROVED 8Y PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.Hi
FILE NAME
\
/�� NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
_Vi , v Office Locations:
W DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
BIDDING
- - --
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
-- --
80376JNFILL GALL DETAILS.DWG
South Carolina
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
RAW WATER INTAKE
INFILTRATION GALLERY PLAN & SECTIONS
■
zi
i
•
LL
LU
co
LU
UJI
r
i
co
ux
LL
i
N2.�
hN2. i

_N (Q
'LFyz
O4s
°Q
ZpZZ�
UO�
W °W
4
'1'1z
w
"M
V
0a
F,-m
0
�ozw
A
� °w
�o
K'z0
wl '
a�wm
°
Y
U
?000
h
0
�mw
°
1
�U
SON y
41 .J
3EaH3Fz
°
(908�
0�°na
0VYZ
QQQw
I
E)
OR E
ASSEMBLY
TO ASSEMBLE EACH GABION, FOLD OUT THE FOUR SIDES
AND THE ENDS; FOLD ADJACENT SIDES UP AND JOIN
EDGES WITH SPIRAL BINDERS; INSERT DIAPHRAGMS AT
3 -FOOT CENTERS AND FASTEN THEM TO THE BASE
PANEL WITH SPIRAL BINDERS. PLACE THE EMPTY
GABIONS IN THE DESIGNED PATTERN ON THE
FOUNDATION. WHEN THE ENTIRE FIRST COURSE IS IN
POSITION, PERMANENTLY SECURE ADJACENT GABIONS BY
INSTALLING VERTICAL SPIRAL BINDERS RUNNING FULL
tAGM HEIGHT AT ALL CORNERS. SIMILARLY SECURE BOTH
EDGES OF ALL DIAPHRAGMS WITH SPIRAL BINDERS. CRIMP
ENDS OF ALL SPIRAL BINDERS.
END FILLING
A WELL GRADED STONE FILL INCREASES DENSITY, PLACE
THE STONE IN 12 -INCH LIFTS WITH POWER EQUIPMENT,
BUT DISTRIBUTE EVENLY BY HAND TO MINIMIZE VOIDS
AND ENSURE A PLEASING APPEARANCE ALONG THE
EXPOSED FACES. KEEP BASKETS SQUARE AND
DIAPHRAGMS STRAIGHT. THE FILL IN ADJOINING CELLS
SHOULD NOT VARY IN HEIGHT BY MORE THAN 1 -FOOT.
LEVEL THE FINAL STONE LAYER ALLOWING THE
DIAPHRAGMS' TOPS TO BE VISIBLE. LOWER LIDS AND BIND
ALONG ALL GABIONS' EDGES AND AT DIAPHRAGMS' TOPS
T WITH SPIRAL BINDERS. ALTERNATIVELY, TIE OR LACING
WIRE CAN BE UTILIZED FOR THIS OPERATION.
SUCCESSIVE COURSES
PLACE THE NEXT COURSE OF ASSEMBLED EMPTY
GABIONS ON TOP OF THE FILLED COURSE. STAGGER THE
JOINTS SO THAT THE VERTICAL CONNECTIONS ARE
OFFSET FROM ONE ANOTHER. BIND THE EMPTY BASKETS
TO THE FILLED ONES BELOW THE SPIRALS OR TIE WIRE
AT ALL EXTERNAL BOTTOM EDGES. BIND VERTICAL EDGES
TOGETHER WITH SPIRAL BINDERS AND CONTINUE WITH
THE SAME STEPS AS FOR THE FIRST LAYER. SUCCESSIVE
COURSES ARE PLACED IN LIKE MANNER UNTIL THE
STRUCTURE IS COMPLETE.
CV -BW1
CV -BW2 ®-
CV-BW3
MANUAL PRESSURE MAINTAINING VALVE
PRESSURE GAUGE
BACKWASH
PUMP
CV -A4
CV -A3
CV -A2
CV -A1
CV -A5
CV -A6
CV -A7
CV -A8
ZONE
Al
ZONE
ZONE W1
500 SF
BACKWASH ZONE
W3
ZONE
ZONE W1
500 SF�
ZONE W3
1,000 SF
ZONE
w p
ON
ZONE W2
1,000 SF
SF
375
SF
CV -BW2 ®-
CV-BW3
MANUAL PRESSURE MAINTAINING VALVE
PRESSURE GAUGE
BACKWASH
PUMP
CV -A4
CV -A3
CV -A2
CV -A1
CV -A5
CV -A6
CV -A7
CV -A8
ZONE
Al
ZONE
A2
BACKWASH ZONE
W3
ZONE
A3
ZONE
A4
375
SF
375
SF
CV -W3
375
SF
375
SF
OPEN
CLOSED
CLOSED'
CV -BW2
o w
w o
OPEN
CLOSED
CV -BW3
CLOSED
CLOSED
OPEN
CV -A1
OPEN
CLOSED
CLOSED
CV -A2
OPEN
CLOSED
0 N
CV -A3
OPEN
CLOSED
CLOSED
ZONE
A5
ZONE
A6
CV -A5
ZONE
A7
ZONE
AS
375
SF
375
SF
V
375
SF
375
SF
MODULATING PRESSURE MAINTAINING VALVE
PRESSURE GAUGE AND TRANSMITTER
INFILTRATION GALLERY BACKWASH SEQUENCE:
BACKWASH INFILTRATION ZONE 1 (W1)
1. SEQUENTIALLY INITIATE AND CEASE AIR SCOUR TO
ZONE Al, A2, A3, AND A4 UNTIL SURFACE WATER IS
VISIBLY CLEAN OF SEDIMENT.
2. INITIATE WATER BACKWASH TO ZONE W1 CONCURRENT
WITH AIR SCOUR TO ZONE Al, A2, A3, AND A4.
BACKWASH INFILTRATION ZONE 2 (W2)
1. SEQUENTIALLY INITIATE AND CEASE AIR SCOUR TO
ZONE A5 AND A6 UNTIL SURFACE WATER IS VISIBLY
CLEAN OF SEDIMENT.
2. INITIATE WATER BACKWASH TO ZONE W2
CONCURRENT WITH AIR SCOUR TO ZONE A5 AND A6.
BACKWASH INFILTRATION ZONE 3 (W3)
1. SEQUENTIALLY INITIATE AND CEASE AIR SCOUR TO
ZONE A7 AND A8 UNTIL SURFACE WATER IS VISIBLY
CLEAN OF SEDIMENT.
2. INITIATE WATER BACKWASH TO ZONE W3
CONCURRENT WITH AIR SCOUR TO ZONE A7 AND A8.
BACKWASH CONTROL VALVE SEQUENCE
INFILTRATION GALLERY WATER AND AIR ZONING
N TS
VALVE
BACKWASH ZONE
W1
BACKWASH ZONE
W2
BACKWASH ZONE
W3
CV -W1
CLOSED
OPEN
OPEN
CV -W2
OPEN
CLOSED
OPEN
CV -W3
OPEN
OPEN
CLOSED
CV -BW1
OPEN
CLOSED
CLOSED'
CV -BW2
CLOSED
OPEN
CLOSED
CV -BW3
CLOSED
CLOSED
OPEN
CV -A1
OPEN
CLOSED
CLOSED
CV -A2
OPEN
CLOSED
CLOSED
CV -A3
OPEN
CLOSED
CLOSED
CV -A4
OPEN
CLOSED
CLOSED
CV -A5
CLOSED
OPEN
CLOSED' -;
CV -A6
CLOSED
OPEN
CLOSED
CV -A7
CLOSED
CLOSED
OPEN
CV -A8
CLOSED
CLOSED
OPEN
INFILTRATION GALLERY WATER AND AIR ZONING
N TS
SECTION B
oo ° °o,N 0AK3p4 B1,i,
DATE
---- vow O • SS /Q °•• 9 ' °e
12-
o.eeras:t +e °,®
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
4" - 6" RIVER STONE IN 3' GABION BASKET
MATCH EXISTING RIVER BED
3" - 4" RIVER STONE BACKFILL
3/4" - 1 -1/2" RIVER STONE
INSTALLED 6" MIN. ABOVE
AND BELOW SCREEN PIPING
(STONE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
4" CL ELEV 2901.92
4" CL ELEV 2901.08
16" CL ELEV 2900.86
4" CL ELEV 2898.57
AIR MODULE CL ELEV 2898.53
1/4" - 1/2" RIVER STONE
ABOVE HDPE LINER
SURROUNDING AIR MODULES
(STONE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
#57 WASHED STONE
12" MIN BELOW HDPE LINER
30 MIL GEOMEMBRANE HDPE LINER
RAW WATER INTAKE
NFILTRATION GALLERY SECTIONS & DETAI
_Q
U
H
N
z
O
Q
cc
Q
LL
•
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
RWH
1/4 " =1' -0"
HICKORY, NC 28602
APPROVALS
DRAWN BY
PRO.IECT DATE
[phone]
CADD
JULY 2012
-
11 ®COA'
NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
BIDDING
APPROVED BY
P8037 NUMBER
W D'(
� 'v
Office Locations:
BLT
FILE NAME
80376.00.HI
/RJ
community infrastructure consultants
North Carolina Georgia
CONS
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
80376JNnLL GALL DETAILS.DWG
South Carolina
SECTION B
oo ° °o,N 0AK3p4 B1,i,
DATE
---- vow O • SS /Q °•• 9 ' °e
12-
o.eeras:t +e °,®
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
4" - 6" RIVER STONE IN 3' GABION BASKET
MATCH EXISTING RIVER BED
3" - 4" RIVER STONE BACKFILL
3/4" - 1 -1/2" RIVER STONE
INSTALLED 6" MIN. ABOVE
AND BELOW SCREEN PIPING
(STONE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
4" CL ELEV 2901.92
4" CL ELEV 2901.08
16" CL ELEV 2900.86
4" CL ELEV 2898.57
AIR MODULE CL ELEV 2898.53
1/4" - 1/2" RIVER STONE
ABOVE HDPE LINER
SURROUNDING AIR MODULES
(STONE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
#57 WASHED STONE
12" MIN BELOW HDPE LINER
30 MIL GEOMEMBRANE HDPE LINER
RAW WATER INTAKE
NFILTRATION GALLERY SECTIONS & DETAI
_Q
U
H
N
z
O
Q
cc
Q
LL
•

€x3
o�o
4y
SJ-W
ci �g
?O p
V Z�O
OO G
� mW
y
Y�tiQ
#F =bl
0
G6Uq
F1�ASW
��8<
L8-5
809
0&75
SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER
` - - - -- ASHE COUNTY NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
—_ - -__ — CLASS WS IV HOW
I 4 TAUGA — - - - - - -- r ~—
COUNTY -- - - - --- — - - - -'
N67'00'00 E
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ 70.00' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -fyi
Y 7
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE
I (
I I
I
I 0) 26'
(
I
I
I�
�IQ>
' O
i�
11.27'
26'
N: 928378.79'
E: 1245367.34'
pen1i��
�` ifs �♦ :�� _'�� �� r'♦� {`n i'n �. �� �♦� �. �� �` �� �` .i♦
206.13"
h
SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH
DRAWN BY
1" =10'
PROJECT DATE
Z' .
Z'
NC 28602
327 -6911
112" IRON ROD
APPROVALS
1
ADDED COORDINATES FOR BUILDING AND INFILTRATION GALLERY
2 -18 -15
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
k. REVISIONS
SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER
` - - - -- ASHE COUNTY NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
—_ - -__ — CLASS WS IV HOW
I 4 TAUGA — - - - - - -- r ~—
COUNTY -- - - - --- — - - - -'
N67'00'00 E
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ 70.00' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -fyi
Y 7
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE
I (
I I
I
I 0) 26'
(
I
I
I�
�IQ>
' O
i�
11.27'
26'
N: 928378.79'
E: 1245367.34'
pen1i��
�` ifs �♦ :�� _'�� �� r'♦� {`n i'n �. �� �♦� �. �� �` �� �` .i♦
206.13"
h
SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH
DRAWN BY
1" =10'
PROJECT DATE
Z' .
Z'
NC 28602
327 -6911
112" IRON ROD
APPROVALS
- - --
CADD
APPROVED BY
BLT
FILE NAME
561'4431 °W
DICKS0N
community infrastructure consultants
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
159.43
- - --
CONSTRUCTION
INFILTRATION GALLERY
80376 -PUMP STATION - SITE- RNAL.DW
South Carolina
pr'�'
RECORD DWG.
- - --
I
I r , �, �, r' r' �' r� r �IJ s✓
/yr
TOWN OF BOONE
OB.- 1425 PG 405
A PORTION OF
PIN: 2942 -68- 6039 -000
LOT 1
435,595 SO. FT.
10.00 ACRES
N: 928424.89'//
E: 1245475.96'
118'
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
206.13"
401 4th STREET SW,
SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH
DRAWN BY
1" =10'
PROJECT DATE
vw
HICKORY,
(828)
NC 28602
327 -6911
112" IRON ROD
APPROVALS
- - --
CADD
APPROVED BY
BLT
FILE NAME
MARCH 2015
PROJECT NUMBER
60376.00.HI
DICKS0N
community infrastructure consultants
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
BIDDING
- - --
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
80376 -PUMP STATION - SITE- RNAL.DW
South Carolina
RECORD DWG.
- - --
E: 1245470.28'
I
N: 928339.95'
E: 1245495.03'
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
i
N61 *4431 "E
�Il
206.13"
O
N: 928339.95'
E: 1245495.03'
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
i
N61 *4431 "E
206.13"
60169
CONTROL CORNER
112" IRON ROD
N 928594.35 (GROUND)
E 1245673.80 (GROUND)
w
a�
1�
z
/yr
oaQ�
Z
Q
LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER,
and AMY COOPER GREER
REMAINING PORTION OF
cc
OR: 1122 PG: 238
Q
0
PIN: 2942 -68 -6039 -000
LL
in
W
Q
W
W�yr
Y.
r
0
Z
z
0
W
W
JIM
J
Q
Z
LL
RAW WATER INTAKE
INFILTRATION GALLERY AND
PUMP STATION LAYOUT.
N2.
N2.7

J
2 Q
Z
F'Y(�
03�
w0
MoZ
z�a
�W=
003
w U W
= Z Y
w�
U
01
w3�
z
�Z)w
O
o =0
h U
030
N
D <_
0 Q
o°°
xK0
[L
L�aW
0 Z d
Li c3
0
� J 5E U
j0Ow
fl w
LVI
�o
I °>
2 U W m
X000
~
L) U
Q
U FZ-JX
? O O 0
(5 U) oz
UOhw -00
�wmw
Z J = Co
0o0J
Y a- Q
0
oocn�
U) -J
Y � U w
�?E,
O °°Q
a
~`d
_
OP am
» n¢
ppU0
U 0 0 V)
VICINITY MAP - WATAUGA COUNTY
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MAPPING:
PAGE
EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE BOOSTER PUMP STATION SITE PLAN SHEETS REPRESENTS FIELD
THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED PLANS CONTAINED WITHIN SHEETS G3.0 THROUGH G3.10 CONSIST OF
SURVEY COMPLETED ON 3/10/2009 & 3/11/2009 BY WK DICKSON. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY
SITE WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT & GAIN ACCESS TO THE BOOSTER PUMP BUILDING. THERE IS ONE
CRITICAL ELEVATIONS SUCH AS ROADS, STREAM AND PIPE INVERTS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO
CULVERT CROSSING THAT WILL IMPACT BOTH STREAM & WETLANDS. THIS SECTION OF THE PROJECT
THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
PLANS ALSO INCLUDES AN EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN THAT WILL ADDRESS SEDIMENT RUNOFF
NUMBER
THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION OF THE BOOSTER PUMP SITE.
SURFACE WATERS SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET HAVE BEEN FIELD LOCATED & IDENTIFIED. A JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM NAME
DETERMINATION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE USACE ON NOVEMBER 21ST, 2011 FOR THE FEATURES IDENTIFIED
GENERAL NOTES:
TO BE IMPACTED.
(LF)
THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL IS BASED ON NC GRID NAD83 IN US SURVEY FEET. THIS PROJECT WAS
1. CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON SHEET G3.4 BEFORE
GROUND LOCALIZED ABOUT NCGS MONUMENT "HAMPTON ".
BEGINNING WORK. SEE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE (THIS SHEET) FOR MORE INFORMATION.
N = 905736.03'
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCESS THE PROJECT SITE THROUGH BROWNWOOD ROAD AT THE PROPOSED
E = 1211369.29'
DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. CONSTRUCTION OF THE 10'X5' CULVERT IS NECESSARY TO BEGIN
P
CONSTRUCTION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE.
COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.999866297
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CAUTION WHILE CROSSING AT THE EXISTING CREEK & WETLANDS SO AS
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
NOT TO DISTURB ANY MORE THAN IS NECESSARY.
PER
Corps
ALL COORDINATES ARE GROUND COORDINATES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL MATERIAL REMOVED OFFSITE IN SAFE AND LEGAL MANNER.
Tributary 7,
Impact S6
G3.3
TEMPORARY BENCHMARKS SHOWN ON THE BOOSTER PUMP STATION SITE PLAN SHEETS SHALL ONLY BE
5. ALL DE- WATERING REQUIRED TO EXECUTE WORK SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
USED FOR THE WORK OF DIVISION 3.
CONTRACTOR. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS 2 & 3, SHEET GO.7.
Corps
6 CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE INSIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE THROUGHOUT
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES:
UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND /OR RELATED WORK OF THE
7. WHERE PRACTICABLE, HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE OPERATED FROM THE STREAM OR WETLAND
1. CONSTRUCTION OF THE 10'X5' CULVERT IS NECESSARY TO ACCESS THE BOOSTER PUMP STATION
BANKS IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENTATION. WHERE THIS IN NOT POSSIBLE, ONLY
SITE AND TO ESTABLISH A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
WELL- MAINTAINED, CLEAN EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE USED INSIDE STREAMS & WETLANDS. SPILL
R
CONTAINMENT EQUIPMENT /MATERIALS SHOULD BE READILY AVAILABLE ON SITE FOR THE DURATION
2. DUE TO THE 10'X5' CULVERT'S PROXIMITY TO BROWNWOOD ROAD, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE
OF THE PROJECT.
REQUIRED TO CLOSE HALF OF BROWNWOOD ROAD FOR TEMPORARY STAGING PURPOSES. TEMPORARY
11.
TRAFFIC CONTROLS WILL BE REQUIRED.
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE & GRADING NOTES-.--
3. ONCE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 10'X5' CULVERT IS COMPLETE, THE STAGING AREA CAN BE REMOVED.
4. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE
PROJECT.
MUTCD OR NCDOT REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
1. PIPE INVERT ELEVATIONS HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SLOPES. HOWEVER, SLOPES SHALL NOT BE
DECREASED FROM THOSE SHOWN ON PLAN WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER.
2. POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL GRADED AREAS.
(�
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE :
3. ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS NOTED ON THE PLAN. PIPE LENGTHS
THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL ACTIONS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR, ONLY A
INDICATED ON PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT SEQUENCE.
4. NO SOIL DISTURBANCE OR COMPACTION, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, TRAFFIC, TRENCHING, OR OTHER
1. OBTAIN ALL APPROVALS NECESSARY TO BEGIN AND COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY SHALL BE PERMITTED BEYOND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WITHOUT PRIOR
APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER.
2. CONDUCT PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING INCLUDING OWNER, ENGINEER, ASSOCIATED CONTRACTORS
PER SHEETS G3.0 THROUGH G3.10.
AND OTHER AFFECTED PARTIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A DETAILED CONSTRUCTION
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN
SEQUENCE PLAN SUBMITTAL AT THIS MEETING.
.ACTUAL CONDITION AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FOR INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING.
3. FLAG THE WORK LIMITS, AND BUFFER AREAS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR PROTECTION. CLEAR AND
ESTABLISH FINAL VEGETATION.
GRUB ONLY AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 10'X5' CULVERT.
6. EXISTING CONTOURS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AT 1' INTERVALS. PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN ARE
AT 1' INTERVALS.
4. PROVIDE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS AS SHOWN IN THE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL.
ON THIS SHEET.
7. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ARE FINISHED GRADES.
3.
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT AREAS.
5. GRADE IN FILL ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF THE 10'X5' CULVERT AT THE STREAM CROSSING AS
8. ALL PIPES, FITTINGS & STRUCTURES SHALL BE PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
NECESSARY FOR PLACEMENT OF BOX CULVERTS.
STREAM IMPACT TABLE- DIVISION -3
RWH N/A HICKORY, NC 28602
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE pa WK (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER WDICKSON BIDDING
JPK 80376.00.HI Office Locations:
FILE NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION
80376_BRW- BOOSTER- R AL. DWG South Carolina
STREAM
PAGE
PERMANENT (P)
TYPE
TYPE OF
PERENNIAL (PER). OR
TYPE OF
AVERAGE STREAM
IMPACT LENGTH
IMPACT
NUMBER
NUMBER
OR TEMPORARY
(T)
OF
IMPACT
STREAM NAME
INTERMITTENT (INT)?
JURISDICTION
WIDTH (FT)
(LF)
(T)
1. DUE TO TROUT MORATORIUMS, ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE UNNAMED TRIBUTARY (INCLUDING
PROPERTY CAUSED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR OR
ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCH EXCAVATION AND /OR PIPE INSTALLATION.
THE CULVERT & GRADING PROPOSED WITHIN THIS PLAN -SET) TO GAP CREEK IS PROHIBITED DURING
Wetland WE,
G3.3
P
Tributary 7,
Impact S5
G3.3
T
Land
Clearing
Tributary 7
PER
Corps
3
75
Tributary 7,
Impact S6
G3.3
P
Culvert
Tributary 7
PER
Corps
3
40
STREAM IMPACT TABLE- DIVISION -3
RWH N/A HICKORY, NC 28602
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE pa WK (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER WDICKSON BIDDING
JPK 80376.00.HI Office Locations:
FILE NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION
80376_BRW- BOOSTER- R AL. DWG South Carolina
WETLAND IMP -ACT TABLE- DIVISION 3
WETLAND
PAGE
PERMANENT (P)
TYPE OF
TYPE OF
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
TYPE OF
AREA OF
IMPACT
NUMBER
OR TEMPORARY
IMPACT
WETLAND
FORESTED
JURISDICTION
IMPACT
(ACRES)
NUMBER
REVISIONS
(T)
1. DUE TO TROUT MORATORIUMS, ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE UNNAMED TRIBUTARY (INCLUDING
PROPERTY CAUSED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR OR
ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCH EXCAVATION AND /OR PIPE INSTALLATION.
THE CULVERT & GRADING PROPOSED WITHIN THIS PLAN -SET) TO GAP CREEK IS PROHIBITED DURING
Wetland WE,
G3.3
P
Culvert
Bottomtand
NO
Corps
0.07
Impact W8
9.
THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ADJUST AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY.
Hardwood Forest
STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS USING TEMPORARY SEEDING MEASURES IN LOCATIONS AS NECESSARY.
CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT EACH OF THE UTILITY OWNERS IN THE AREA OF
EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED PER GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON SHEET G0.5.
12.
SLOPES IN GRADED AREAS & GRASS SWALES EXCEED 3:1 SLOPES. SEE SHEET G3.3 FOR SLOPE
UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND /OR RELATED WORK OF THE
LABELS.
10.
ONCE PHASE E/S CONTROLS ARE IN PLACE, CLEAR AND GRUB AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION
ANY INCONVENIENCE OR DELAY CAUSED BY THE OPERATIONS OF OTHERS PERFORMING THE ABOVE
R
RECORD DWG.
OF ALL PROPOSED CONDITIONS.
13.
WETLANDS & STREAMS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BOOSTER PUMP
11.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE & COORDINATE RELOCATION OF OVERHEAD WIRES WITH BLUE RIDGE
STATION SITE PROJECT. SEE THE BOOSTER PUMP STATION SITE DATA TABLE LOCATED ON THIS
ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CO.
PROJECT.
SHEET FOR THESE QUANTITIES, AND SHEET G3.3, FOR THE WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT LOCATIONS.
12.
INSTALLATION OF WATERLINE AT PUMP STATION SITE SHALL BE COMPLETED PER DIVISION 3 & 4
PLAN SHEETS.
EROSION C 0 N TR 0 L:
13.
CONSTRUCT BOOSTER PUMP STATION BUILDING PER DIVISION 3 PLAN SHEETS AND SITE AMENITIES
PER SHEETS G3.0 THROUGH G3.10.
1.
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: t 0.49 AC. (FOR BOOSTER PUMP STATION SITE ONLY)
14.
PERFORM FINAL GRADING AND PLACEMENT OF ASPHALT DRIVEWAY.
15.
ESTABLISH FINAL VEGETATION.
2.
MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N.C.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL.
16.
WITH APPROVAL OF E/S INSPECTOR, REMOVE ALL E/S CONTROLS.
3.
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT AREAS.
CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE AN APPROVED COPY OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT ON
SITE AT ALL TIMES.
BOOSTER PUMP STATION SITE DATA TABLE
n n
WETLAND IMP -ACT TABLE- DIVISION 3
WETLAND
PAGE
PERMANENT (P)
TYPE OF
TYPE OF
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
TYPE OF
AREA OF
IMPACT
NUMBER
OR TEMPORARY
IMPACT
WETLAND
FORESTED
JURISDICTION
IMPACT
(ACRES)
NUMBER
REVISIONS
(T)
1. DUE TO TROUT MORATORIUMS, ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE UNNAMED TRIBUTARY (INCLUDING
PROPERTY CAUSED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR OR
ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCH EXCAVATION AND /OR PIPE INSTALLATION.
THE CULVERT & GRADING PROPOSED WITHIN THIS PLAN -SET) TO GAP CREEK IS PROHIBITED DURING
Wetland WE,
G3.3
P
Culvert
Bottomtand
NO
Corps
0.07
Impact W8
9.
THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ADJUST AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY.
Hardwood Forest
STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS USING TEMPORARY SEEDING MEASURES IN LOCATIONS AS NECESSARY.
CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT EACH OF THE UTILITY OWNERS IN THE AREA OF
9.
SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DESCRIPTION OF SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL AND COMPACTION
6.
ONCE THE 10'X5' CULVERT AND WINGWALLS ARE IN PLACE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE FILL IN
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS PERCENT
REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUITABLE MATERIAL AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE FINAL
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
REVISED IMPACT TABLE FOR 401/404 RESUBMISSION
3 -18 -15
PROJECT GRADES.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
75 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS
STREAM AND IMPACT DATA TABLES ADDED
11 -7 -1j
REV. N0.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
9.
SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DESCRIPTION OF SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL AND COMPACTION
6.
ONCE THE 10'X5' CULVERT AND WINGWALLS ARE IN PLACE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE FILL IN
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS PERCENT
REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUITABLE MATERIAL AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE FINAL
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
ORDER TO ESTABLISH A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AS SHOWN ON SHEET G3.4.
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS PERCENT
PROJECT GRADES.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
75 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS
40 LF
7.
INSTALL AND IMMEDIATELY STABILIZE THE PROPOSED PERIMETER TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH AS
10.
CONTRACTOR TO REMAIN WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AT ALL TIMES. ANY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT
4.
SHOWN ON SHEET G3.4.
1. DUE TO TROUT MORATORIUMS, ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE UNNAMED TRIBUTARY (INCLUDING
PROPERTY CAUSED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR OR
ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCH EXCAVATION AND /OR PIPE INSTALLATION.
THE CULVERT & GRADING PROPOSED WITHIN THIS PLAN -SET) TO GAP CREEK IS PROHIBITED DURING
REPLACE TO ORIGINAL OR SUPERIOR CONDITION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE
8.
INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCES AND ALL OTHER EROSION CONTROL
THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE USE OF THE
FOR ANY REGULATORY RESTITUTION CAUSED BY NOT REMAINING WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
DEVICES AS SHOWN ON SHEETS G3.4 SHALL BE INSTALLED.
11.
CONTRACTOR MUST ESTABLISH GROUNDCOVER ON EXPOSED SLOPES PER THE "GROUND COVER
9.
THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ADJUST AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY.
SCHEDULE" ON SHEET GO.5.
STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS USING TEMPORARY SEEDING MEASURES IN LOCATIONS AS NECESSARY.
CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT EACH OF THE UTILITY OWNERS IN THE AREA OF
EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED PER GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON SHEET G0.5.
12.
SLOPES IN GRADED AREAS & GRASS SWALES EXCEED 3:1 SLOPES. SEE SHEET G3.3 FOR SLOPE
UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND /OR RELATED WORK OF THE
LABELS.
10.
ONCE PHASE E/S CONTROLS ARE IN PLACE, CLEAR AND GRUB AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION
ANY INCONVENIENCE OR DELAY CAUSED BY THE OPERATIONS OF OTHERS PERFORMING THE ABOVE
R
RECORD DWG.
OF ALL PROPOSED CONDITIONS.
13.
WETLANDS & STREAMS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BOOSTER PUMP
11.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE & COORDINATE RELOCATION OF OVERHEAD WIRES WITH BLUE RIDGE
STATION SITE PROJECT. SEE THE BOOSTER PUMP STATION SITE DATA TABLE LOCATED ON THIS
ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CO.
PROJECT.
SHEET FOR THESE QUANTITIES, AND SHEET G3.3, FOR THE WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT LOCATIONS.
12.
INSTALLATION OF WATERLINE AT PUMP STATION SITE SHALL BE COMPLETED PER DIVISION 3 & 4
PLAN SHEETS.
EROSION C 0 N TR 0 L:
13.
CONSTRUCT BOOSTER PUMP STATION BUILDING PER DIVISION 3 PLAN SHEETS AND SITE AMENITIES
PER SHEETS G3.0 THROUGH G3.10.
1.
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: t 0.49 AC. (FOR BOOSTER PUMP STATION SITE ONLY)
14.
PERFORM FINAL GRADING AND PLACEMENT OF ASPHALT DRIVEWAY.
15.
ESTABLISH FINAL VEGETATION.
2.
MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N.C.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL.
16.
WITH APPROVAL OF E/S INSPECTOR, REMOVE ALL E/S CONTROLS.
3.
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT AREAS.
CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE AN APPROVED COPY OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT ON
SITE AT ALL TIMES.
BOOSTER PUMP STATION SITE DATA TABLE
4. SEE EROSION CONTROL SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
U 5. DE- WATERING OF THE WORK AREAS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION
IN ORDER TO KEEP THE WORK AREA DRY.
6. STAGING AREAS AND MATERIAL STOCKPILES FOR THIS PROJECT ARE TO BE LOCATED TO PREVENT
SOIL AND SEDIMENT LOSS. STOCKPILES OF FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE ENCOMPASSED BY SILT FENCE
EXCEPT FOR THE POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE STOCKPILE AREA.
7. SEE DETAIL 6/GO.5 FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING REQUIRED FOR THIS SITE AND MAXIMUM DAYS
PERMITTED FOR EXPOSED SOILS.
UTILITY COORDINATION:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT NC ONE -CALL AT 1- 800 -632 -.4949 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS .PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
TOTAL PROJECT /DISTURBED AREA
0.49 ACRES
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA
0 ACRES
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS PERCENT
0%
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
0.16 ACRES
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS PERCENT
34.8%
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
75 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS
40 LF
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS
0 ACRES
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
2,836 SF OR 0.07 ACRES
2.
IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UTILITIES OR IF FURTHER VERIFICATION OF FACILITIES OR
NOTE: SEE SHEET G3.3 FOR STREAM & WETLAND IMPACTS.
TEMPORARY DISRUPTION OF SERVICE IS NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AND SHALL FULLY COORDINATE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS
WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY.
3.
ANY MONUMENTATION DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY:
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
4.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT AND PROTECT ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
1. DUE TO TROUT MORATORIUMS, ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE UNNAMED TRIBUTARY (INCLUDING
ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCH EXCAVATION AND /OR PIPE INSTALLATION.
THE CULVERT & GRADING PROPOSED WITHIN THIS PLAN -SET) TO GAP CREEK IS PROHIBITED DURING
THE PERIOD BETWEEN OCTOBER 15TH AND APRIL 15TH.
5.
THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE USE OF THE
CONTRACTOR IN PROVIDING PROTECTIONS FOR THE UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE TOWN OF
BOONE, DESIGN CONSULTANT, AND /OR AGENT SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
ACCURACY OR LOCATION, SIZE, DEPTH OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION. BEFORE BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT EACH OF THE UTILITY OWNERS IN THE AREA OF
CONSTRUCTION RELATIVE TO THEIR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL
UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND /OR RELATED WORK OF THE
CONTRACTOR OR HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE TOWN OF BOONE HARMLESS FOR
ANY INCONVENIENCE OR DELAY CAUSED BY THE OPERATIONS OF OTHERS PERFORMING THE ABOVE
R
RECORD DWG.
WORK. NECESSARY ADJUSTMENT OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, EXCEPT FOR CONTRACT
ITEMS, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHERS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SATISFACTORY PROGRESS OF THE
PROJECT.
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 401 4th STREET SW SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE
RA
A. 13910
0
3flc3
USDA. RAW WATER: PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEGEND
.PROPOSED GRADING
SPOT SHOT +3198.30
LOW POINT IN GRADE (LP)
HIGH. POINT IN GRADE (HP)
PROPOSED CONTOURS 2910 2911
EXISTING CONTOURS - 2910
- -- - - --
PROPOSED STORM
SEWER /CULVERT
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC LINE (COORDINATE UE
.WITH BLUE RIDGE ELECTRIC
MEMBERSHIP)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LOD��
PROPOSED CENTERLINE
OF DITCH
PROPOSED WATERLINE
.EXISTING RIGHT OF
'WAY LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD. WIRES pW
EXISTING FENCELINE X X
EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS
LINE -_T --
EXISTING PROPERTY .LINE.
QEXISTING TREELINE
EXISTING WETLANDS
EXISTING WETLANDS,
PERMANENT IMPACTS W + + W W W
EXI
PERMANENT IMPACTS
EXISTING STREAM,
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
SILT FENCE,
SEE DETAIL 2/G0.6
INLET PROTECTION,
SEE DETAIL 6/G3.10
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE,
SEE DETAIL 1/G0.5
FIBER CHECK DAM LINE,
SEE DETAIL 7/G3.10
EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
'SEE DETAILS 1/G0.6 &
1 /G0.8
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH, �.
SEE DETAIL 8/G3.10
SILT FENCE OUTLET,
SEE DETAIL 4/G0.5 _ CD
BOOSTER PUMP STATION
GENERAL NOTES.
z
0
1-
U
z
z
Cz
U
z
0
LL
0
z
Cz
Q
W
z
z
z
z
(z
W
Q
z
L�
G3.0
3.10
R
RECORD DWG.
3flc3
USDA. RAW WATER: PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEGEND
.PROPOSED GRADING
SPOT SHOT +3198.30
LOW POINT IN GRADE (LP)
HIGH. POINT IN GRADE (HP)
PROPOSED CONTOURS 2910 2911
EXISTING CONTOURS - 2910
- -- - - --
PROPOSED STORM
SEWER /CULVERT
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC LINE (COORDINATE UE
.WITH BLUE RIDGE ELECTRIC
MEMBERSHIP)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LOD��
PROPOSED CENTERLINE
OF DITCH
PROPOSED WATERLINE
.EXISTING RIGHT OF
'WAY LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD. WIRES pW
EXISTING FENCELINE X X
EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS
LINE -_T --
EXISTING PROPERTY .LINE.
QEXISTING TREELINE
EXISTING WETLANDS
EXISTING WETLANDS,
PERMANENT IMPACTS W + + W W W
EXI
PERMANENT IMPACTS
EXISTING STREAM,
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
SILT FENCE,
SEE DETAIL 2/G0.6
INLET PROTECTION,
SEE DETAIL 6/G3.10
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE,
SEE DETAIL 1/G0.5
FIBER CHECK DAM LINE,
SEE DETAIL 7/G3.10
EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
'SEE DETAILS 1/G0.6 &
1 /G0.8
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH, �.
SEE DETAIL 8/G3.10
SILT FENCE OUTLET,
SEE DETAIL 4/G0.5 _ CD
BOOSTER PUMP STATION
GENERAL NOTES.
z
0
1-
U
z
z
Cz
U
z
0
LL
0
z
Cz
Q
W
z
z
z
z
(z
W
Q
z
L�
G3.0
3.10
BOOSTER PUMP STATION
GENERAL NOTES.
z
0
1-
U
z
z
Cz
U
z
0
LL
0
z
Cz
Q
W
z
z
z
z
(z
W
Q
z
L�
G3.0
3.10

L
Q
�"YZU
03o
WO
Foz
zF a
�2wx
OZN
UO
LJUO
W
x Z Y
F-w0�
WFa
0
w
Z Z z
Z) w
Cr oce
o F-
F- U
O ' 0
F- W
U < _
0 0-
0 L0
W J �
oaw
Q�
oza.
W3O
J K U
j0Ow
WSW,
L'i —
x �o
F- <
M W > LLI
X0LLIM
X000
QIU~
UF- C, LLJ
?000
°oho
F
GWmw
Z J E m
OW wo
dd' J
Y f d Q
O O N
Z -J
Y 0,W
F Z.(n
OZ
Fr-'dLL]
0LjZ�
U)Q
a U Y Z
OOUO
000(1
\ \
EDGE OF PAVEM ENT
LL! \
W
CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE &
COORDINATE WITH BLUE RIDGE
ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP FOR
RELOCATION OF POWER POLE, BENCH MARK
I GUYS WIRES AND OVERHEAD o
S. PK NAIL SET
LINE
IN WHI TE STRIP
LINE sA T EDGE OF ASPHAL T EDGE of PAVEMENT
I pROPERN ELEV. = 318Z 16'
539) D
w ., w w
R S \ ---
Y 0 0 w w w w w w w
w w w
w w o w w w w w w
--w .w C
PROPOSED WETLAND Iv OF PAVEMENT IMPACT. SEE GRADING PLAN B Q W N
w � w �. w w W \1. 0
PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT. -OD _ w -- --
SEE GRADING PLAN LOD v -
LOD
00 LOD �� w w w w w 14/ w w w w w w
PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT -- w - . 1.k -r0 w w w + 1. 0 -------- _0 SEE GRADING w w w
ww
,
w
v c
m c
c
v ``
mm00
° ) (3)
Q� N
0.
s 1
REVISIONS
DATE
SEAL �9 "
038086��•�
A. BIRG
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
O
U
O
U/ /
z
O
U
O
LL-
LLJ
0
v�
Q
W
O
O
U)
W
0
Q
GRAPHIC SCALE Z
10 5 0 5 10 20
1" =10'
BOOSTER PUMP STATION
EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO. PLAN
7 G3.1
3.10
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1 " =10'
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.Hi
FILE NAME
80376 -BRW- BOOSTER - RALDWG
Mah WK
WDIC'FESON
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(.828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
APPROVALS
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
DATE
SEAL �9 "
038086��•�
A. BIRG
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
O
U
O
U/ /
z
O
U
O
LL-
LLJ
0
v�
Q
W
O
O
U)
W
0
Q
GRAPHIC SCALE Z
10 5 0 5 10 20
1" =10'
BOOSTER PUMP STATION
EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO. PLAN
7 G3.1
3.10

� J
= Q
OLL0
W O
FOz
Z r Q
f W =
Z U)
O Z
U O
w U 0 Ld
= Z Y
r W C
wF- a
0��
War
� z
�0
O r U
OZ � 0
1- N
U _
o<ar
o w
�zo
W
0zn.
wc�p
0 J a- U
> O W
U3
WZTr
�o
1
rJ
Z Q
Q�U W_D]
JO(O
J 0 O
F-
< U
U ~ J 0
Z p p C)
Z 0
p
p OZ � O
43WF7W
zJ =m
W p
J
0
Y d Q
O O v) _
a V)
N -J
Y p U W
�k=ztn
OQp O UQ
r F w
0 w Z D
�g0r
y�(nQ
2 U Y Z
0 0 - 0
000(n
S
�X
�k
a
0
60165 N 918068.36
5/8" REBAR E 1250359.04
N 918102.03 (GROUND)
E 1250336.90 (GROUND) o
0
X
�o -Ow
X
-. OW
W LOD wom� LOD
BENCHMARK• OW
pW
/OWN 918055.25
E 1250364.69
60D NAIL IN x OW OW _____ -- — OW
BASE OF PP
ELEV. 3194.96
60162
BENCH MARK �\ NK91I 941.15 (GROUND)
PK NAIL SET E 1250497.86 (GROUND) o
IN WHI TE STRIP
AT EDGE OF ASPHALT EoGE of PAVEMENT
ELEV. = J18716'
0
OW - -o
TOWN OF BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
WA TAUGA COUNTY PLAT BOOK 22,
PA GE 53 THE (1.00 A CRE)
PROPOSED 125 LF SIDEWALK.
SEE DETAIL 4/03.10.
N.
o w
I o
J�
1�1'—N 917977.43 w
E 1250307.39
o �
you
ILOD
x COD's
I LOD LOD � LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD � LOD � LOD LOD
I
REVISIONS
PROPOSED
16.5'
F
;
DRAWING SCALE
x
PARKING
RWH
1
WK
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
STRIPE
PROJECT DATE
RAB
MARCH 2015
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
BIDDING
APPROVED BY
PROJECT NUMBER
x
D
I C
�S*4O
o d
JPK
80376.00.HI
x
Office Locations:
CONSTRUCTION
FILE NAME
community infrastructure consultants
North Carolina Georgia
80376 -BRW- BOOSTER- RAL.DWG
South Carolina
RECORD DWG.
,.. .�
Y
X
X
J
1
X
Y
i
Q
�
1
w
I
x
w
w
o
o
LO
''
1
X
X
Wow
1
� c
I
--
N 918033.42
X
E 1250275.03
QO N
X
W)
Z
J
W
a
n
x
a0
a-
x
o
60162
BENCH MARK �\ NK91I 941.15 (GROUND)
PK NAIL SET E 1250497.86 (GROUND) o
IN WHI TE STRIP
AT EDGE OF ASPHALT EoGE of PAVEMENT
ELEV. = J18716'
0
OW - -o
TOWN OF BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
WA TAUGA COUNTY PLAT BOOK 22,
PA GE 53 THE (1.00 A CRE)
PROPOSED 125 LF SIDEWALK.
SEE DETAIL 4/03.10.
N.
o w
I o
J�
1�1'—N 917977.43 w
E 1250307.39
o �
you
ILOD
x COD's
I LOD LOD � LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD � LOD � LOD LOD
I
REVISIONS
DATE
-51
SEAL
038086,:f
o
o
C)
U
o D
o
Q v v c) C�
0
OnY LL-
LLJ
v
o
Q
W
W
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
o O
0
Z
W
o �
/ Q
GRAPHIC SCALE Z
10 5 0 5 10 20 (�
o \
VI = 10
BOOSTER PUMP STATION
SITE PLAN
G3.
3.10
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
RWH
1 " =10'
WK
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
DRAWN BY
PROJECT DATE
RAB
MARCH 2015
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
BIDDING
APPROVED BY
PROJECT NUMBER
D
I C
�S*4O
JPK
80376.00.HI
Office Locations:
CONSTRUCTION
FILE NAME
community infrastructure consultants
North Carolina Georgia
80376 -BRW- BOOSTER- RAL.DWG
South Carolina
RECORD DWG.
DATE
-51
SEAL
038086,:f
o
o
C)
U
o D
o
Q v v c) C�
0
OnY LL-
LLJ
v
o
Q
W
W
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
o O
0
Z
W
o �
/ Q
GRAPHIC SCALE Z
10 5 0 5 10 20 (�
o \
VI = 10
BOOSTER PUMP STATION
SITE PLAN
G3.
3.10

N J
S Q
1-Y Z-0,
O �'(If
L�O
FOZ
Z H Q
Uj I W =
z V)
0 §
00
w U O
LLJ
= z Y
wO�
w F-
0
w�
(n z
� O m
O h U
Oz'O
2
U ()f _
�a�
o°'w
of zo
� J �
Q w
0za-
O J
w c �U o
j

U J
= Q
Y Z
� 2
0 [if
O
�OZ
Z H Q
f- W =
Z(n�_
00 ZZ 3.
W
On
= Z Y
�-Wof
�F- a
Ot:2
w3F
D -w
CK O M
O=ff
O
O'0
F_ F- L
Off=
n < H
0 Li
Of zo
J 11
L�aW
oz(h
wg0
J
j

N < `
YZ
`0
0
N40Z
ZZ
w Z 2
Ooi
w V O
w�
4 t- <
"5'
W
¢1]
O V
ZO � 0
F N
¢z0
a-
Vi '
Gaza
O Wq0
y OtVj
K�1.•wd.
W Z
Nw¢CI
�(=Jwmw i
og
< O U O
N_ m
Jw
U �
?OO9
0
O N p Z
VOW U
r-
`�jmw
m
D J
r�iie
N _
YOVw
3F?N
m 'o
MZK
w
O Z E
Ow
Q U -0 Z
O OV
V06 Vi
l
•_.'. is �i
/ R: OC .. .
VO
O
U� O
7-
Q�Cy)
QON
4
X
li
x
j�
X
I
x
i
x
X
i
I
X
X
WI
=x
W
k1
s�I
x
Q
X
I
X
I
X Lo
Z
J
H
LU
a
x 0
a-
x
I
x
I
PROPOSED STREAM
CROSSING DETAILS
Ow
�LOD� LOD
`Ow
ow
BOOSTER PUMP STA 77ON o I
FFE: 3199.33
fl y 1
I �
<c L
SUPPLY
RISER
I
DISCHARGE
RISER
I I
!------------------------------ - - - - -I
TOWN OF BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
WATAUGA COUNTY PLAT BOOK 22,
PAGE 53 THE (7.00 ACRE)
LODE LODE LODE LODE LODE LOD lwlw� LOD mw� LOD � LOD =� LOD
I _ _ ow
g Ow
Ow
ow --�_ �\
Ow
row
o PROPOSED STREAM CROSSING,
SEE DIVISION 4 SHEETS FOR
CCROOSSSITRENCH
G DEETAtILSATERUNE , FROM 0� OF Raw)
�0p` ACK (45
490 � FRONT �I
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
DRAWNG SCALE
i " =10'
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
�WK (828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
W DICKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
DRAWN BY
RAB
PROJECT DATE
MARCH 2015
BIDDING
APPROVED BY
JPK
PROJECT NUMBER
80376.00.H1
CONSTRUCTION
FaE NAME
80376_BRW- BOOSTER-
RAL.DWG
RECORD DWG.
aaa�nnnuuionn,,,,,�
r
,,n.y,� ,,,,hA
oW-- ______
t / Ow
041
Ow
CO
ONr
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
JAMES C. WA TSON
LIVING TRUST
DB: 566 PG. 743PIN: o
2957 -08- 7007 -000
Z
J
0
o;
'"- -OW w OW
OW-_'---OW
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
O
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA J
O
t
O /
O /
o �
NOTES:
1. SEE EN3 SERIES PLANS FOR CRITICAL WATERLINE
ELEVATIONS AT BOOSTER PUMP BUILDING.
2. ALL PIPE TO HAVE MINIMUM 4' OF COVER.
3. ALL DIP SHALL MEET PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
o
� X
4 0 IN
� — OW---- -
OW�X,
0
o z
s 0
�D
I`
z
0 0
�v U
r v �0 2'
O
LL-
LLJ
� Q
o �
Q
Ld
J
o �
I--
0
z
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 5 0 5 10 20
1" =10'
BOOSTER PUMP STATION
UTILITY PLAN
G3.
z
0
U?
Ld
LD
of
.COI

n J
_ Q
Z
� Y �
03X
o
FOZ
z Q
mow=
0z0 ;
U 0
W
W
2 Z Y
F- W of
WIQ
0��
W -
n
s W
O
O,U
O :0
F=Ful
Q S
0La
�zo
a J Cl)
Q W
0za_
_j
0
Lj J U
> 0w
W
wZ ~~
to � � O
~ O
Z Q
S L >
U O U) W
tr U W'm
J�00
Q V) UF
O
UF- J W
? OO O p
OZp0
U OZ H O
� Ld
Z J
OWOJ
U1 0 X J
Y a 4
O N
Z -J
Y U U W
`l F- =(n
OQC)Q
F- - d W
O W Z 2
of Q
OOVU
U0C) (/)
�.
L • J
0
'Ap F'yj
06 1p
0
IXI
\ \ \ \ ON
�Q0
Q0 quo QQ 10 Q0 tD 9p
3201
3200
3199
3198
3197
3196
3195
3194
3193
3192
3191
3190
3189
31.88
3187
3186
3185
3184
3183 O +OQ
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
BATE
...... ........
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
......... ............
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
D I C 1KO N Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
1 i 2
RECORD DWG.
80376_BRW- BOOSTER- CULVERT AND D
AILS- RAL.DWG South Carolina
oQ
�Q_09-
O °°3 0 N 0 00.
=0� �Q
rn w
ipCSM WS
La
� w
300rn 0Q
= 00 w
j=
W w
} IO
�-
Doi M
W
W LL
�'
F- a
.- w
a
w
av~iR �c=> 0
cn
1
n w
jw
a-u) z -,,o
............_ ..:......................................
... ..............:..................................................... ,.__..........,........_................_...........................
.................. .......................................__.............,..............._....................................................
......... ......................................... ........... ................................ ......
Ile
... ......................... ................... ........._....................................................._.._...
...............
............_... _ ............
PROP OS D GUA DRAILS
SEE
IC I o I
T.
2.0 0
_.____
_........__.__
_.__..__.__.
DETAI S 4/GO 6& 1
0.7 2.0%
I 1
L=3196.50
I
(FO
GUARDRAIL DI ENSIO
S &
I I
!
..........................................
........:....................__ ...........L...._OA-B.ON
....S.EE...._D..TA........
!L. 2 ......
7
3..........................:......:..........................
I I
.............................._
8,_O %.....
_ROU.LD..R.........._..... _
E
= 3195.0
CROS
SLOPE
..............................
........... .
........._............:......._ ,.. ... ... .. .................... ..... ....... ....
... ..
..... \\\ ... .. ..;. ... ... ....
_._ ......._.......
......
...
... ....... ._._:.__ .__.__..__ : ............
__.._ .... .__._.. ..
_._._ ---------- _ -----
__ ----------
00
LO
PROPOSED
+
(6
� �
STREAM
M
BOTT M
w
;
S
_
RIFFLE
SEE
GRAD CONTROL
DETAIL, 3HEET C3.9
�
guy L =319
00
L 3189
00
!..
L =318 .00;,,
\r
3 =
L .00
_.__.._...FILL
-!;I- lb�
1' DEEP WITH
K' <�
IN-SITU
BED
STR AM
MATERI L
/
_
_...,_ _y___. .._._�.
C NCRET
_..___
L
PROPOSED
BOTTOM
n-
rn
3201
3200
3199
3198
3197
3196
3195
3194
3193
3192
3191
3190
3189
31.88
3187
3186
3185
3184
3183 O +OQ
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
BATE
RAH RO SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
D I C 1KO N Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
80376_BRW- BOOSTER- CULVERT AND D
AILS- RAL.DWG South Carolina
3201
.3200
3199
3198
3197
3196
3195
3194
3193
3192
3191
3190
3189
3188
3187
3186
3185
3184
+ 3183
PROFILE - GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 20 40
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZONTAL
2 0 2 4
SCALE: 1" = 2'
VERTICAL
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
��•' �'� FOR THE
ossoa�r-- :&y TOWN OF BOONE DETAILS
,� ?YG114s: �cs�- BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
CAL7N�C ON ECALL
BEFORE YOU DIG
STUP
811
,AVOID UTILITY DAMAGE.
z
_\
L_
LLI
U\
W
z
W
0
LL-
G3.6
3.10

L
s
05
F C
zF
LdLL
zv
o-
UC
w
C
u
wF
O�
w3
U�
� C
O F
03
QCt
U Ct
�a
On
a-' L
a-
wcc
Of C
LL
D —
wC
>1
w3
vn L
w —
F
H L LL
of
J C
C
av
U ~
ZC
_F
O v
U
qj F
Li
Z LL
0
v)
Y
UC
v
Y L
F
^C
OC
Q
H
S
(� ILL
0
oC
U C
ISOMETRIC VIEW
NTS
10' -0"
4' -0"
a e. a
a ,
°
4
°
p4. c 41 e ° 4
° 4 Q.
a,
SEE NOTE 3 CONCRETE BAFFLE DETAIL FOR UPSTREAM STRUCTURE
NTS
10' -0" .a
0
I
<V
PROP 10'X5'
RCBC
PROP 10'X5'
RCBC
4' -0"
a a. d 4- mo_ Q o n°
°
e e
N4 4
4 04
° 4
SEE NOTE 3 CONCRETE BAFFLE DETAIL FOR DOWNSTREAM STRUCTURE
NTS
1
G3.6 G3.7
CULVERT DETAILS
NTS
REV. N0. DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISIONS
JOINT WRAP
PROPOSED 10' x 5' REINFORCED
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT (RCBC)
12" M
FIGURE 1
NTS
NOTES:
1. SEAL THE EXTERNAL JOINT WITH AN OUTSIDE SEALER WRAP THAT IS AT LEAST 12 INCHES WIDE
AND COVERS THE JOINT AROUND ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE BOX SECTION. USE CONWRAP
CS -212 FROM CONCRETE SEALANTS, INC., EZ —WRAP FROM PRESS —SEAL GASKET CORPORATION,
SEAL WRAP FROM MAR —MAC MANUFACTURING CO.,INC. CADILLOC EXTERNAL PIPE JOINT FROM
CADILLOC, OR AN APPROVED EQUAL FOR THE OUTSIDE SEALER WRAP. IF THE OUTSIDE SEALER
WRAP IS NOT APPLIED IN A CONTINUOUS STRIP ALONG THE ENTIRE JOINT, A 12 INCH MINIMUM
OVERLAP OF THE OUTSIDE SEALER WRAP IS PERMITTED. BEFORE. PLACING THE OUTSIDE
SEALER WRAP, CLEAN AND PRIME THE AREA RECEIVING THE OUTSIDE SEALER WRAP IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEALER WRAP MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. THE SEALER WRAP
MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION RECOMMENDATION SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE SHOP
DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. THE OUTSIDE SEALER WRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED IN TWO
PIECES AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 1.
2. COVER THE OUTSIDE SEALER WRAP WITH A 3 FOOT STRIP OF FILTER FABRIC CONFORMING TO
TYPE 4 REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 1056 OF THE NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
3. BAFFLE CONNECTION TO BE DETERMINED BY PRECAST MANUFACTURER. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT
SHOP DRAWINGS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH N/A
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
WK (828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.H1
FILE NAME
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
WD ICKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
80376_BRW- BOOSTER - CULVERT AND D
AILS- RAL.DWG South Carolina
0 SE
� �� ; u
Ar
/ °�� sA. • �� ®�� °moo.
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DETAILS
J
.n
J
G3.7
G3.10

e-
On
LLI
af
7) LLJ
Uj
Zo
Ld
20 2'
MIN. MIN
SUITABLE
MATERIAL
.4 1 SUITABLE
1. MATERIAL
±1 FOOT COMPACTED SOIL
AND CHANNEL BED
MATERIAL
22 '
'
'
LGEOTEXTILE WATTING PER | /
!
PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
___
8UBQRADE PLACE CULVERT ON NO. 57 STONE AS SHOWN
AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT - TRENCH DETAIL
NTS
BY MANUFACTURER
^/
�
| |
| |
/ /
NOTES
1. THE PRECAST UNITS SHALL BE CAREFULLY POSITIONED ON THE PREPARED FOUNDATION, FEMALE END UPGRADE NTH MALE END FULLY INSERTED AND
EACH JOINT CHECKED FOR ALIGNMENT. SATISFACTORY FITTING AND PROPER GRADE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS THE WORK PROCEEDS.
2. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN DURING 8ACKRLL AND COMPACTION TO MAINTAIN ALIGNMENT AND PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE JOINTS. UNITS THAT BECOME
MISALIGNED, SHOW EXCESSIVE SETTLEMENT OR HAVE OTHERWISE BEEN DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERA11ON SHALL, AT THE DISCRETION OF
THE ENQ|NEER, BE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
3. UNDERCUT T0 AN ADDITIONAL 36" MIN. AND BACKF|LL NTH NO. 57 STONE. THE LIMITS OF THIS UNDERCUT EXCAVATION SHALL BE AT LEAST THE
LIMITS OF THE BOX CULVERT INCLUDING HEADWALLS.
4, CULVERT SHALL BE FILLED 1 FOOT WITH SOIL AND CHANNEL BED MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM THE EXISTING CHANNEL BED.
[i ALL TRENCHING OPERATIONS SHALL MEET OSHA STANDARDS.
8' A MINIMUM OF 24- FROM OUTSIDE WALL OF CULVERT TO SIDE OF TRENCH MUST BE COMPACTION OF FILL MATERIAL. 8ACKRLUNQ OF
TRENCHES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE CULVERT IS PLACED. THE FILL AROUND THE CULVERT SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT
TO EXCEED 8~. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL WATER BE PERMITTED T0 RISE IN UNBACKRLL[D TRENCHES AFTER THE CULVERT HAS BEEN PLACED.
COMPAC11ON REQUIREMENTS SHALL ATTAINED BY THE USE OF MECHANICAL TAMPS ONLY. EACH AND EVERY LAYER OFBACKRLL SHALL BE PLACED
LOOSE AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED INTO PLACE PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
7, THE DESIGN, DETAILS AND SHOP DRAWINGS FOR PRECAST O` 5' CULVERT, FOOTINGS, VNNCVALL FOOTINGS W0NQWALLS AND ENDWALL3 SHALL BE
PROVIDED BY THE PRECAST MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
B. PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR HS20-44 LOADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST VERSION OF AASHTO SPECIFICATIONS
WITH ALL SUBSEQUENT INTERIM SPECIFICATIONS.
Q. PRECAST CONCRETE CULVERT SHALL HAVE A FINAL OPENING AREA OF A MINIMUM OF 35 SQUARE FEET WHEN INVERT, FOOTINGS AND FINAL GRADES
ARE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. '
REVISIONS
`
BY MANUFACTURER--.
'
TOR,� SEE
TOP DFWING
/
/
/
\
\
\
\
\
\
/ \
i^
\ � TOP OF ENDWALL TOP OF ENDV0\LL
\ `
ELEV = 3196.50 ELEV = 3105.50
0 HEADWALL-2
STRUCTURE 32'-0" FACE TO FACE
PROP. 10x5 RCBC
/
--'TOP OF ENDVALL TOP OF ENDVALL
`� / / ELEV = 3196.50 ELEV= 310550
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
TOP OFWING
^"'WC, "",,^�,
\
\
�DHEADWALL-2 ELEVATION (UPSTREAM)
NOT TO SCALE
DATE
-
-M 038086 Uj
\
\
\
\
/
/
/
HEADWALL-1
| |
DOWNSTREAM _|
| | |
STRUCTURE |
|
\
—T--
�
.|
_
_
�
\
\
, \
TOP OFWING
~
/
/ �—
TOPUFWIN
ELEV = 3193.00±
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR TA��
� _
-�������K ���� ����������
U����U� ��K- ������U��_
B8ONE NORTH CAROLINA
0 HEADWALL-1 ELEVATION (DOWNSTREAM)
NOT TO SCALE
0
U
-_
i� ��
��
()
~'
0
LL-
C�
LLI
kl
LLJ-.
_]
LLJ
��
��
|
CD
L�
_]
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH N/A
DRAWN BY PROJECT FATE
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.1-11
FILE NAME
80376-BRW- BOOSTER - CULVERT AND D4rAILS-RAL.DWG
WK
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
[phone]
NC LICENSE NO. F-0374
Office Locations:
North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
APPROVALS
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
DATE
-
-M 038086 Uj
\
\
\
\
/
/
/
HEADWALL-1
| |
DOWNSTREAM _|
| | |
STRUCTURE |
|
\
—T--
�
.|
_
_
�
\
\
, \
TOP OFWING
~
/
/ �—
TOPUFWIN
ELEV = 3193.00±
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR TA��
� _
-�������K ���� ����������
U����U� ��K- ������U��_
B8ONE NORTH CAROLINA
0 HEADWALL-1 ELEVATION (DOWNSTREAM)
NOT TO SCALE
0
U
-_
i� ��
��
()
~'
0
LL-
C�
LLI
kl
LLJ-.
_]
LLJ
��
��
|
CD
L�
_]

J
=
F_ z
Y z �
W O
(n OZ
Z H Q
Ld W 3-
z w
OU z§
W U 0
Ld
= Z Y
W 0.
WF_ Q
o��
W -
U)
> >W
0.O ZD
o ZD
ova
U 0. =
Z) Q
Op 0. W
Q�zo
a -JUi
Ld
af < Ld
pza.
WEo
p J L > U
,OW
W3W�
wz~~
o
Of F 0
Z Q
2 >
�5(nW
0.0 W_O7
Jp
J .pa O �
Q U U
UH z1
ZpzpO
. O
Z
U.0
Oo Ld
O J
(4 CL <
Y 0. Q
0.
DpL/)cn
V) ^J
Y 0 U W
?� F Z V)
^o
@¢C)a
_ FL: -*d
oLj <
}�w
0. p Y z
OOU�?
U��(n
REVISIONS
DATE ` t I F 1/////
f�!!
0`
AL .y '
;�•. 038086(r
• oc _.
;may• F `� �`��� - *c
GRAVEL SUBSTRATE
50 / 50 MIX OF CLASS A RIP RAP
AND #5 STONE
A
GRADE CONTROL ROCK
TOP OF BANK 50/50 MIX CLASS A/B RIP RAP
BOTTOM OF BANK
2.5'
oo0oa0000000 oo0oa0000000o00000
O�O�O�O�O
PROJECT MANAGER
DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
RWH
N/A
o000000000000 00000a000ao00000000
�������
0
O
HICKORY, NC 28602
FLOW
B
DRAWN BY
PROJECT DATE
WK
(828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB
MARCH 2015
2.5'
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
BIDDING
APPROVED BY
PROJECT NUMBER
DICKSON
JPK
80376.00.HI
Office Locations:
CONSTRUCTION
FILE NAME
community infrastructure consultants
North Carolina Georgia
80376_BRW- BOOSTER -CULVERT AND D
AILS- RAL.DWG
South Carolina
RECORD DWG.
DATE ` t I F 1/////
f�!!
0`
AL .y '
;�•. 038086(r
• oc _.
;may• F `� �`��� - *c
GRAVEL SUBSTRATE
50 / 50 MIX OF CLASS A RIP RAP
AND #5 STONE
A
GRADE CONTROL ROCK
TOP OF BANK 50/50 MIX CLASS A/B RIP RAP
BOTTOM OF BANK
2.5'
oo0oa0000000 oo0oa0000000o00000
O�O�O�O�O
D
a00000000000ao0000a o C 0000 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :? ' D o a o 0 0 0 0
'
-
o000000000000 00000a000ao00000000
�������
0
O
FLOW
B
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0o Do0000000ap000000a000000000
Q_>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00000000000o0000a000a00000000000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0
\_PnTTf)kA (lI` PAMV
2.5'
TOP OF BANK
20' -0"
A
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL - PLAN VIEW
TOP OF RIFFLE
(SEE PROFILE
FOR DESIGN ELEV.) SLOPE VARIES
(SEE PROFILE)
FILTER
FABRIC
GRAVEL SUBSTRATE
50/50 MIX OF CLASS A RIP RAP
AND #5 STONE
EROSION CONTROL
LINER
FLOW
DESIGN BED
SURFACE
BANKFULL ELEVATION
BOTTOM OF RIFFLE
(SEE PROFILE FOR
DESIGN ELEV.)
r— 0.5'
O � o
° 1.75' MIN
1.25' MIN
GRADE CONTROL ROCK MATCH
50/50 MIX CLASS A/B RIP EXIST.
RAP GRADE
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL — PROFILE B —B
30' -0"
— EROSION CONTROL
SEE DETAILS 4 & 5, SHEET G0.7 LINER.
FOR BANK STABILIZATION
BANKFULL ELEVATION
1.25' MIN. INVERT SET AT PROFILE
GRADE
a a
� � a
FILTER ° U?
FABRIC `V
GRAVEL SUBSTRATE
50 / 50 MIX OF CLASS A RIP
RAP AND # 5 STONE GRADE CONTROL ROCK
50 / 50 MIX CLASS A / B RIP RAP
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL — SECTION A —A
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
G3.4 G3.9 NTS
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DETAILS
z
0
U
Un
0
U
O
L�
W
U)
LLI
Q
I
W
0
z
a
V)
W
G3.9
3.10

N J
S a
Z
r Y
o3�
0
F-
zra
WwS
z (f)
Oz;�
00
W U O
W
Z Y
W0�
0
W 1_
=W
O F U
0 a
h F (N
U ()f _
o0r
°zo
Ld W
cko 0a
Oza
L.1 C�0
p J U
j °Ow
WSW=
U)
� �o
U) w�
>
=ML
X 0 W m
JopO
a�00
LLJ
U r J W
Zoo
-r ' 0
ozo0
O U
� Uj
Z J S m
0 L
Y m Q
U O S
o V)
N ^J
Y� Jw
Z N
C0 ^O
O
Q
r�dSw
XM0E-F-
5- Cn a
d U Y z
00 U 0
U0a(A
0
0
S
G:
Y- --I
I
Y
PLAN
WITH COPING REMOVED
rE
MAX. PIPE THIS SIDE - 18" 0
SECTION Y -Y
MIN. HEIGHT, H)
DIMENSIONS AND QUANTITIES FOR DROP INLET(BASED ON
DIMENSIONS
Z
CUBIC YARDS
CONCRETE
GENERAL NOTES:
O O
PIPE
MORTAR JOINTS 1/2" +/- 1/8" THICK.
WIDTH
MIN. HEIGHT
USE CLASS "B" CONCRETE THROUGHOUT.
Q ,
B
USE FORMS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE BOTTOM SLAB.
H DC U
WALL PER
FOOT HT .
TOTAL BRICK
MASONRY FOR
MIN. HEIGHT, H
e-,
R. C.
USE #4 BAR DOWELS AT 12" CENTERS.
O JO Z
X
2' - O"
co =
0.313
DEDUCT FOR PIPE(S) FROM TOTAL CU. YDS. OF BRICK MASONRY.
cc
0.032
PROVIDE ALL CATCH BASINS OVER 3' -6" IN DEPTH WITH STEPS 12"
W << V' _ .
U OC O
=
ON CENTER. USE STEPS WHICH COMPLY WITH STD. DRAWING 840.66.
Q H
-
USE BRICK OR CONCRETE BLOCK WHICH COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
F- = ~ Z W
0.047
OF SECTION 840 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
O F- L_ O J
RIP-
IF REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE IS SET IN BOTTOM SLAB OF BOX, ADD TO SLAB
Z O H CC
0.313
AS SHOWN ON STD. NO. 840.00.
0.044
0.065
FOR 8' -0" IN HEIGHT OR LESS, USE 8" WALL. OVER 8' -0" IN HEIGHT, USE
�
W
F-' H
U'
3' -0"
12" WALL TO 6' -0" FROM TOP OF WALL AND 8" WALL FOR THE REMAINING
0.313
0
0.078
6' -0 ". QUANTITES TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
30"
p
2' -011
3' -6"
0.268
0.313
0.991
CONSTRUCT WITH PIPE CROWNS MATCHING.
0.170
DO NOT USE BRICK MASONRY DROP INLET IN LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO
TRAFFIC.
CHAMFER ALL EXPOSED CORNERS 1 ".
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE.
- BRICK COPING (INCIDENTAL)
TOP ELEVATION
=
STD. 840.16
O
FRAME AND GRATE
dI
LL
rE
MAX. PIPE THIS SIDE - 18" 0
SECTION Y -Y
MIN. HEIGHT, H)
DIMENSIONS AND QUANTITIES FOR DROP INLET(BASED ON
DIMENSIONS
OF BOX & PIPE
CUBIC YARDS
CONCRETE
CUBIC YARDS
BRICK MASONRY
DEDUCTIONS FOR
ONE PIPE
PIPE
SPAN
WIDTH
MIN. HEIGHT
D
A
B
H
BOTTOM
SLAB
WALL PER
FOOT HT .
TOTAL BRICK
MASONRY FOR
MIN. HEIGHT, H
C. S.
R. C.
12"
3' - 0"
2'-0"
2' - O"
0.268
0.313
0.522
0.020
0.032
15"
f8 C
=
2' -3"
0.268
0.313
0.600
0.031
0.047
18"
CLASS B R
RIP-
2' -611
0.268
0.313
0.678
0.044
0.065
24"
�
W
3' -0"
0.268
0.313
0.835
0.078
0.113
30"
3' -O"
2' -011
3' -6"
0.268
0.313
0.991
0.122
0.170
1
G3.3 133.1
L�
I
DROP INLET DETAIL
NTS
NOTES:
1. L IS LENGTH OF RIPRAP APRON.
2. THE DOWNSTREAM WIDTH (W) OF THE APRON IS EQUAL TO
Do +Lo (MINIMUM TAILWATER)
3. A FILTER BLANKET OR FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED
BETWEEN RIP -RAP & IN -SITU SOILS.
IN 4. DIMENSIONS OF EACH APRON ARE TABULATED BELOW.
MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT RIPRAP OUTLET STRUCTURES WEEKLY AND AFTER SIGNIFICANT (1/2
INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL EVENTS TO SEE IF ANY EROSION AROUND OR
BELOW THE RIPRAP HAS TAKEN PLACE, OR IF STONES HAVE BEEN DISLODGED.
IMMEDIATELY MAKE ALL NEEDED REPAIRS TO PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE.
SECTION A -A
STRUCTURE D
DIAMETER A
Z
Uj
J
LU
H
APRON R
RIP -RAP R
Cr
H
(L
5.0 6
6.0 6
6.0 1
12 C
CLASS B R
RIP -RAP
DITCH B N
�
O
O
0
6.0 1
12 C
ZC3oc
RIP -RAP
PIPE A 1
T
#4 BAR
4.5 f
co
f8 C
=
RAP
PIPE B 1
15 8
8.0 3
V
►
r
CLASS B R
RIP-
_
N
~
MM
W
N
T
N N
Z
U1
J
�
W
6" ►� ►�
Z
z
07
DOWEL
W
NTS
NOTES:
1. L IS LENGTH OF RIPRAP APRON.
2. THE DOWNSTREAM WIDTH (W) OF THE APRON IS EQUAL TO
Do +Lo (MINIMUM TAILWATER)
3. A FILTER BLANKET OR FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED
BETWEEN RIP -RAP & IN -SITU SOILS.
IN 4. DIMENSIONS OF EACH APRON ARE TABULATED BELOW.
MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT RIPRAP OUTLET STRUCTURES WEEKLY AND AFTER SIGNIFICANT (1/2
INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL EVENTS TO SEE IF ANY EROSION AROUND OR
BELOW THE RIPRAP HAS TAKEN PLACE, OR IF STONES HAVE BEEN DISLODGED.
IMMEDIATELY MAKE ALL NEEDED REPAIRS TO PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE.
SECTION A -A
STRUCTURE D
DIAMETER A
APRON A
APRON A
APRON A
APRON R
RIP -RAP R
REMARKS
DITCH A N
N/A 5
5.0 6
6.0 6
6.0 1
12 C
CLASS B R
RIP -RAP
DITCH B N
N/A 5
5.0 6
6.0 6
6.0 1
12 C
CLASS B R
RIP -RAP
PIPE A 1
18 8
8.5 4
4.5 f
fO.D f
f8 C
CLASS B R
RAP
PIPE B 1
15 8
8.0 3
3.75 9
9.25 f
f8 C
CLASS B R
RIP-
2' MIN.
LINE WITH EROSION WASTE MATERIAL- COMPACT,
CONTROL MATTING
AS SHOWN ON SEED & MULCH AFTER
DETAIL 1/GO.6 CONSTRUCTION OF DITCH L
o
OFFSITE FLOW
LO
NOTES:
MAINTENANCE: CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW 1. TEMPORARY SILT DITCH TO BE USED
ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE SITE IN
INSPECT TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL. ORDER TO BYPASS OFFSITE FLOWS
IMMEDIATELY REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM THE FLOW AREA AND REPAIR THE AND PREVENT SEDIMENT EROSION.
DIVERSION RIDGE. CAREFULLY CHECK OUTLETS AND MAKE TIMELY REPAIRS AS 2. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM DITCH
NEEDED. WHEN THE AREA PROTECTED IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED, REMOVE ONCE IT L ONE -HALF FULL
THE RIDGE AND THE CHANNEL TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL GROUND LEVEL
AND APPROPRIATELY STABILIZE IT. 3. DITCH SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED
WHEN DAMAGED BY EQUIPMENT OR
COVERED BY FILL.
a TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
G3.4 G3.1 NTS
L REVISIONS
SHEET 1 OF 1
840.15
N
SECTION G -G
►► nnnnrCS+(J+IQN
21- 31/4►►
1 16,► 21
SECTION H -H
2
G3.3 G3.1
GENERAL NOTES:
1. UNIFORMLY GRADE A SHALLOW DEPRESSION
APPROACHING THE INLET.
2. DRIVE 5 -FOOT STEEL POSTS 2 FEET INTO THE
GROUND SURROUNDING THE INLET. SPACE POSTS
EVENLY AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE INLET, A
MAXIMUM OF 4 FEET APART.
3. SURROUND THE POSTS WITH WIRE MESH
HARDWARE CLOTH. SECURE THE WIRE MESH TO
THE STEEL POSTS AT THE TOP, MIDDLE, AND NCDOT #5 OR #57
BOTTOM. PLACING A 2 -FOOT FLAP OF THE WIRE WASHED STONE
MESH UNDER THE GRAVEL FOR ANCHORING IS
RECOMMENDED.
4. PLACE CLEAN GRAVEL (NC DOT #5 OR #57
STONE) ON A 2:1 SLOPE WITH A HEIGHT OF 16
INCHES AROUND THE WIRE, AND SMOOTH TO AN
EVEN GRADE.
5. ONCE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS
BEEN STABILIZED, REMOVE ACCUMULATED
SEDIMENT, AND ESTABLISH FINAL GRADING
ELEVATIONS.
6. COMPACT THE AREA PROPERLY AND STABILIZE IT
WITH GROUNDCOVER.
MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT INLETS AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH
SIGNIFICANT (1/2 INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL EVENT. CLEAR
THE MESH WIRE OF ANY DEBRIS OR OTHER OBJECTS TO PROVIDE
Z
1%2`1 31.611 ��
1
c 1/2
�� 15/8►► �-•-- 15/8►, Hp v
r �H F� ; 000 =z
II E �Ocroc
-� H
O O CO Q CC
Z . 1
~ H
Q D
N
M
LO
T
PLAN OF FRAME LID
l'-7§/8"I V-748
CAST IRON
PLAN OF GRATING w00
CAST IRON LL CC °z
p 0
G _ E
co
°�- o -� �-
r - - - N
N
D
c�
1/8 ►r 1/8 it 1/8 r►
1 r► 1 ►► 1 ►►
31- 33/4►'
1/8 ►► 1/ 8 It 1/8 it I
3/ it 3/ if
-o
3` -2n
VIA
t
21/811 218 rr
3'- 15 /4►► N N
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH N/A
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
.--1/8 ►►
APPROVALS
�
Q
�
00
,� 1►►
0
W
�
Q
c3
�
D
1/8 ►►
Q
LPL
FILTER
LFABRIC
5
APRON
AT
PIPE
OUTLETS
OR FILTER
=
Cl)
J
H
G3.4
G3.1
NTS
N N
2' MIN.
LINE WITH EROSION WASTE MATERIAL- COMPACT,
CONTROL MATTING
AS SHOWN ON SEED & MULCH AFTER
DETAIL 1/GO.6 CONSTRUCTION OF DITCH L
o
OFFSITE FLOW
LO
NOTES:
MAINTENANCE: CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW 1. TEMPORARY SILT DITCH TO BE USED
ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE SITE IN
INSPECT TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL. ORDER TO BYPASS OFFSITE FLOWS
IMMEDIATELY REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM THE FLOW AREA AND REPAIR THE AND PREVENT SEDIMENT EROSION.
DIVERSION RIDGE. CAREFULLY CHECK OUTLETS AND MAKE TIMELY REPAIRS AS 2. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM DITCH
NEEDED. WHEN THE AREA PROTECTED IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED, REMOVE ONCE IT L ONE -HALF FULL
THE RIDGE AND THE CHANNEL TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL GROUND LEVEL
AND APPROPRIATELY STABILIZE IT. 3. DITCH SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED
WHEN DAMAGED BY EQUIPMENT OR
COVERED BY FILL.
a TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
G3.4 G3.1 NTS
L REVISIONS
SHEET 1 OF 1
840.15
N
SECTION G -G
►► nnnnrCS+(J+IQN
21- 31/4►►
1 16,► 21
SECTION H -H
2
G3.3 G3.1
GENERAL NOTES:
1. UNIFORMLY GRADE A SHALLOW DEPRESSION
APPROACHING THE INLET.
2. DRIVE 5 -FOOT STEEL POSTS 2 FEET INTO THE
GROUND SURROUNDING THE INLET. SPACE POSTS
EVENLY AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE INLET, A
MAXIMUM OF 4 FEET APART.
3. SURROUND THE POSTS WITH WIRE MESH
HARDWARE CLOTH. SECURE THE WIRE MESH TO
THE STEEL POSTS AT THE TOP, MIDDLE, AND NCDOT #5 OR #57
BOTTOM. PLACING A 2 -FOOT FLAP OF THE WIRE WASHED STONE
MESH UNDER THE GRAVEL FOR ANCHORING IS
RECOMMENDED.
4. PLACE CLEAN GRAVEL (NC DOT #5 OR #57
STONE) ON A 2:1 SLOPE WITH A HEIGHT OF 16
INCHES AROUND THE WIRE, AND SMOOTH TO AN
EVEN GRADE.
5. ONCE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS
BEEN STABILIZED, REMOVE ACCUMULATED
SEDIMENT, AND ESTABLISH FINAL GRADING
ELEVATIONS.
6. COMPACT THE AREA PROPERLY AND STABILIZE IT
WITH GROUNDCOVER.
MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT INLETS AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH
SIGNIFICANT (1/2 INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL EVENT. CLEAR
THE MESH WIRE OF ANY DEBRIS OR OTHER OBJECTS TO PROVIDE
Z
1%2`1 31.611 ��
1
c 1/2
�� 15/8►► �-•-- 15/8►, Hp v
r �H F� ; 000 =z
II E �Ocroc
-� H
O O CO Q CC
Z . 1
~ H
Q D
N
M
LO
T
PLAN OF FRAME LID
l'-7§/8"I V-748
CAST IRON
PLAN OF GRATING w00
CAST IRON LL CC °z
p 0
G _ E
co
°�- o -� �-
r - - - N
N
D
c�
1/8 ►r 1/8 it 1/8 r►
1 r► 1 ►► 1 ►►
31- 33/4►'
1/8 ►► 1/ 8 It 1/8 it I
3/ it 3/ if
-o
3` -2n
VIA
t
21/811 218 rr
3'- 15 /4►► N N
31-611 2' -6n
O
LL.
SECTION E -E SECTION F -F
DROP INLET GRATE DETAIL
' MAX.
NTS
ADEQUATE FLOW FOR SUBSEQUENT RAINS. TAKE CARE NOT TO NCDOT #5 OR #57
DAMAGE OR UNDERCUT THE WIRE MESH DURING SEDIMENT WASHED STONE
REMOVAL. REPLACE STONE AS NEEDED.
6 INLET PROTECTION
G3.4 I G3.1
LEVEL LIP OF SPREADER
0 ELEV.: 3190.00
STAPLE EROSION CONTROL
MATTING IN PLACE
FI.oW
NTS
EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
SEE DETAIL 1/130.6
5'
/n�
NOTE: LEVEL LIP OF SPREADER SHALL BURY LINER 0.5' MIN.
BE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 10'
19 -GAUGE HARDWARE CLOTH
(J" MESH OPENINGS)
2'
J-
I
2'
1
CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT LEVEL SPREADERS AFTER EVERY
RAINFALL UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED,
AND PROMPTLY MAKE NEEDED REPAIRS.
s TEMPORARY LEVEL SPREADER PERODIC INSPECTIONS, AND KEEP IL VEGETATION
G3.4 G3.1 NTS IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION.
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH N/A
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
.--1/8 ►►
APPROVALS
�
Q
�
00
,� 1►►
0
W
�
Q
c3
�
D
1/8 ►►
Q
LPL
-
C0
LU
=
Cl)
J
H
H
N N
Z
U1
IL
O
�
W
07
31-611 2' -6n
O
LL.
SECTION E -E SECTION F -F
DROP INLET GRATE DETAIL
' MAX.
NTS
ADEQUATE FLOW FOR SUBSEQUENT RAINS. TAKE CARE NOT TO NCDOT #5 OR #57
DAMAGE OR UNDERCUT THE WIRE MESH DURING SEDIMENT WASHED STONE
REMOVAL. REPLACE STONE AS NEEDED.
6 INLET PROTECTION
G3.4 I G3.1
LEVEL LIP OF SPREADER
0 ELEV.: 3190.00
STAPLE EROSION CONTROL
MATTING IN PLACE
FI.oW
NTS
EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
SEE DETAIL 1/130.6
5'
/n�
NOTE: LEVEL LIP OF SPREADER SHALL BURY LINER 0.5' MIN.
BE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 10'
19 -GAUGE HARDWARE CLOTH
(J" MESH OPENINGS)
2'
J-
I
2'
1
CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW MAINTENANCE:
INSPECT LEVEL SPREADERS AFTER EVERY
RAINFALL UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED,
AND PROMPTLY MAKE NEEDED REPAIRS.
s TEMPORARY LEVEL SPREADER PERODIC INSPECTIONS, AND KEEP IL VEGETATION
G3.4 G3.1 NTS IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION.
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH N/A
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
WK (828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
RAB MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
JPK 80376.00.H1
FILE NAME
80376 -BRW- BOOSTER -CULVERT AND D
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
DICKUSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
AILS- RAL.DWG South Carolina
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
0
ate` �'• �.y�oi
•� y • 7 s
-''- SEAL 9 '
�A 038086 w
r1 /j ,A B0
RQO0��
SHEET 1 OF 1
840.16
SURFACE COURSE
2.5" SF9.5A
BASE COURSE
12" COMPACTED
AGGREGATE BASE
COURSE.
SUBGRADE
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
3 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION
133.2 133.1 NTS
WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLAN
6X6 W1.4XW1.4 WELDED WIRE
FABRIC REINFORCEMENT
SEE NOTE 1
4"
SEE NOTE 2
SEE NOTE 3
NOTES:
1. SIDEWALK SHALL BE 3000 PSI CONCRETE (AIR ENTRAINED), WITH
CONTRACTION JOINTS SPACED AT 5' O.C., EXPANSION JOINTS SPACED AT
20' O.C. MAX AND BETWEEN WALK AND STRUCTURES, CURBS, AND FACE OF
BUILDING.
2. BASE COURSE MATERIAL (NATURAL OR CRUSHED GRAVEL) SHALL BE PER
ASTM D -2940, & COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 95% PROCTOR DENSITY AS PER
ASTM D -4254, OR EQUIVALENT.
3. COMPACTED SUBGRADE (MIN. 95% PROCTOR DENSITY.
�I
4 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION
133.2 133.1 NTS
i
•. i.•.0 ru rrn r. nn� nn i [•
FL_HIN VILVV - A
NOTES: z
O
FIBER CHECK DAM 1. TEMPORARY FILTER FIBER ROLLS SHALL BE LOCATED AS
ROLL (12" DIA.) SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
WOODEN STAKES SHALL BE
STAPLE FABRIC INTO SPACED 5' ON CENTER ALONG 2. BEFORE INSTALLATION OF FIBER ROLL, SMOOTH AND U
GROUND ON UPSTREAM & THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE SHAPE EARTH SURFACE AND REMOVE ALL STONES, ROOTS,
DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF ROLL FIBER ROLL. PROVIDE 2 OR OTHER DEBRIS GREATER THAN 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER.
BACKFILL AND COMPACT
STAKES ANGLED AS SHOWN. 3. EXCAVATE A TRENCH EACH ROLL. 3 INCHES DEEP FOR PLACEMENT OF
�
LOOSE MATERIAL Un
UPSTREAM OF ROLL X 4. STAKES SHALL BE 18 " -24" IN LENGTH SPACED 5 FOOT ON Z
_ CENTER ON THE UPSTREAM & DOWNSTREAM SIDES OF THE O
FIBER ROLL.
5. FABRIC OF FIBER ROLL SHALL BE STAPLED INTO THE U
GROUND APPROXIMATELY 1 INCH UPSTREAM OF THE EDGE
6" (MIN.) 6" (MIN.) OF THE ROLL.
EMBEDMENT
EMBEDMENT O
MAINTENANCE: LL_ SECTION A - A INSPECT FIBER ROLLS FOR DAMAGE AFTER EACH RUN -OFF
EVENT. ANTICIPATE SUBMERGENCE AND DEPOSITION ABOVE
THE FIBER ROLL AND EROSION FROM HIGH FLOW EVENTS. 0
CORRECT ALL DAMAGE K0*'7""II`I"""""`�TEMPORARY C FIBER ROLL EROSION CONTROL ACCUMULATED BEHIND THEEFIB RLROL SEAS NE DEID, W
133.4 133.1 NTS Q
W
W
MAINTENANCE: (-
DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, CHECK GRASS -LINED CHANNELS AFTER O
INSTALL PERMANENT EVERY RAINFALL. AFTER GRASS IS ESTABLISHED, PERIODICALLY CHECK THE
SYNTHETIC MATTING CHANNEL; CHECK IT AFTER EVERY HEAVY RAINFALL EVENT. IMMEDIATELY
PER DETAIL 1/130.8 MAKE REPAIRS. IT IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT TO CHECK THE CHANNEL
OUTLET AND ALL ROAD CROSSINGS FOR BANK STABILITY AND EVIDENCE OF
PIPING OR SCOUR HOLES. REMOVE ALL SIGNIFICANT SEDIMENT
ACCUMULATIONS TO MAINTAIN THE DESIGNED CARRYING CAPACITY. KEEP
THE GRASS IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION AT ALL TIMES, SINCE IT IS Z
L L THE PRIMARY EROSION PROTECTION FOR THE CHANNEL. U
0 o INSPECT CHANNELS AT REGULAR INTERVALS AS WELL AS AFTER MAJOR
II RAINS AND MAKE REPAIRS PROMPTLY. GIVE SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE U)
L OUTLET AND INLET SECTIONS AND OTHER POINTS WHERE CONCENTRATED W
1.5' 3.0' 1.5' FLOW ENTERS. CAREFULLY CHECK STABILITY AT ROAD CROSSINGS AND LOOK
FOR INDICATIONS OF PIPING, SCOUR HOLES OR BANK FAILURES. MAKE
REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATION ADJACENT TO THE
CHANNEL IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION TO PROTECT THE AREA FROM
EROSION AND SCOUR DURING OUT -OF -BANK FLOW. Q
10 PERMANENT DITCH SECTION z
L�
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
133.4 133.1 NTS
DETAILS
I
J
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
133.4 133.1 NTS
DETAILS
I
J

m Q
~SS Y _
U
030
Z0
Wz
903
WUW
LL
>bW
0iE=
U
?F:0
�OZa
�oO
&ego
wzV�
0
�Bwm
�c0o
QyU
>w
U -�K
zo000
0
jF=rWmW
aw$m
0
x�aa
oov„xn
W Ci y
xo
3F?�
G¢Uq
xz �
"sod
00-�
UOCW
421
APPROX. 6 MILES TO TOWN OF
BOONE (FROM INTERSECTION
OF BROWNWOOD ROAD & NEW
US HIGHWAY 421)
321 TowN of -
BOONE LIMITS
A
9
sy9� ,py�
90q 00G
n ti�
OG
WN
BROWNWO0D ROAD
(3.1 MILES TO
INTERSECTION OF NEW
US HIGHWAY 421)
PROPOSED 24"0 DI
RAW WATER LINE
VICINITY MAP- WATAUGA COUNTY
NOT TO SCALE
WATER LINE SITE DATA TABLE
TOTAL PROJECT /DISTURBED ARE 46.05 ACRES 4
A'
24" DIP PRESSURE CLASS SCHEDULE
PRESSURE CLASS
START
f --
A
9
sy9� ,py�
90q 00G
n ti�
OG
WN
BROWNWO0D ROAD
(3.1 MILES TO
INTERSECTION OF NEW
US HIGHWAY 421)
PROPOSED 24"0 DI
RAW WATER LINE
VICINITY MAP- WATAUGA COUNTY
NOT TO SCALE
WATER LINE SITE DATA TABLE
TOTAL PROJECT /DISTURBED ARE 46.05 ACRES 4
A'
24" DIP PRESSURE CLASS SCHEDULE
PRESSURE CLASS
START
END
250
0 +00
134 +50
200
134 +50
333 +50
250
333 +50
380 +00
200
380 +00
429 +00
250
429 +00
450 +00
200
450 +00
618 +25
A5
STREAM IMPACT TABLE - DIVISION 4
STREAM
IMPACT
NUMBER
PERMANENT
(P) OR
TEMPORARY
(T)
TYPE OF
IMPACT
STREAM NAME
PERENNIAL (PER) OR
INTERMITTENT (INT)?
TYPE OF
JURISDICTION
AVERAGE
STREAM
WIDTH (FT)
IMPACT
LENGTH (LF)
TRIBUTARY 8, IMPACT S1
T
excavation
Tributary 8
PER
Corps
4
10
HARDIN CREEK, IMPACT S2
' T
excavation
Hardin Creek
PER
Corps
10
10
S3
T
-SBACK
SETBACK
- - - -
THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL IS BASED ON NC GRID NAD83 IN US SURVEY FEET. THIS PROJECT WAS
PE
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PE
excavation
GROUND LOCALIZED ABOUT NCGS MONUMENT "HAMPTON ":
CE
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
_CE -
S4
T
E = 1211369.29' q
PDE
PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
-PDE
excavation
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
TRIBUTARY 7, IMPACT S5
T
excavation
Tributary 7
PER
Corps
3
75
MEADOW CREEK 4,
IMPACT S7
T =
excavation
Meadow Creek 4
PER
Corps
4
10
TRIBUTARY 6, IMPACT S8
T
excavation
Tributary 6
PER
Corps
3
10
TRIBUTARY - 5, IMPACT S9
T
excavation
Tributary 5
PER
Corps
6
10
MEADOW CREEK 3,
IMPACT S10
T
excavation
Meadow Creek 3
PER
Corps
10
10
MEADOW CREEK 2,
IMPACT S11
T
excavation
Meadow Creek 2
PER
Corps
15
10
NOTE: STREAM IMPACTS ARE NOTED ON WATER LINE PLAN SHEETS
6
REVISED; SURVEY CONTROL NOTE & STREAM IMPACT TABLE PER NCDENR COMMENTS
2/12/15
5
' REVISED PER NCOOT'
8/5/14
4
REVISED. WL -SITE DATA AND STREAM IMPACT TABLES. MAPPING DETAILS REVISED.
3/18/14
3
ADDED. STREAM IMPACT TABLE -
11/6/12
2
NGDENR ADDED TO PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING MEMBERS
8/20/12
1
EROSION CONTROL REVISIONS PER NCDENR
8/14/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION'
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED PLANS CONTAINED WITHIN THE DIVISION 4 SERIES SHEETS CONSIST OF
THE RAW WATER LINE FROM THE INTAKE PUMP STATION, ALONG BROWNWOOD ROAD TO THE BOOSTER
PUMP STATION, THEN FURTHER ALONG BROWNWOOD ROAD TO NEW HWY 421, ALONG NEW HWY 421 TO
NEW RIVER HILLS, ALONG NEW RIVER HILLS, TRAVERSING AROUND BOONE's WWTP, AND FOLLOWING THE
PRIMARY SEWER OUTFALL AND FINALLY CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING 16" DIAMETER RAW WATER LINE ON
HUNTING HILLS LANE. THERE ARE MULTIPLE STREAM CROSSINGS AND FIVE RIVER CROSSINGS BY HDD
PROPOSED.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON SHEETS C4.1 THROUGH
C4.21 BEFORE BEGINNING WORK IN SPECIFIC WORK AREA. SEE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE (THIS
SHEET) FOR MORE INFORMATION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CAUTION WHILE CROSSING AT STREAM CROSSINGS SO AS NOT TO DISTURB
THE EXISTING STREAM ANY MORE THAN IS NECESSARY.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL MATERIAL REMOVED OFFSITE IN A SAFE AND LEGAL MANNER.
4. ALL DE- WATERING REQUIRED TO EXECUTE WORK SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL 3/GO.7.
5. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE INSIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE THROUGHOUT
CONSTRUCTION.
6. WHERE PRACTICABLE, HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE OPERATED FROM THE STREAM OR WETLAND
BANKS IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENTATION. WHERE THIS IN NOT POSSIBLE, ONLY
WELL- MAINTAINED, CLEAN EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE USED INSIDE STREAMS & WETLANDS. SPILL
CONTAINMENT EQUIPMENT /MATERIALS SHOULD BE READILY AVAILABLE ON SITE FOR THE DURATION
OF THE PROJECT.
7. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PIPE DEFLECTION IS 5' (3' FOR RESTRAINED JOINT PIPE);
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL APPROPRIATE BENDS WHERE NECESSARY TO
MAINTAIN ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED ROUTE. CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE DEGREE OF
BEND AND STATION LOCATION ON AS -BUILT DRAWINGS.
8. ANY GUARDRAIL REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE REINSTALLED BY THE END OF
THE WORKING DAY ACCORDING TO NCDOT STANDARDS. AT NO TIME SHALL AN OPEN
SECTION OF GUARDRAIL BE LEFT UNPROTECTED WITHOUT A PROPER LANE CLOSURE OR
TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES. 4
EROSION CONTROL:
1. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: t 47.58 AC. (FOR RAW WATER LINE ONLY)
2. MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N.C.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT AREAS.
CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE AN APPROVED COPY OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT ON
SITE AT ALL TIMES.
4. SEE EROSION CONTROL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
5. DE- WATERING OF THE WORK AREAS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION
IN ORDER TO KEEP THE WORK AREA DRY. WHEN DEWATERING OF WATER LINE TRENCH IS REQUIRED,
DISCHARGE SHALL BE PUMPED THROUGH A SILT SACK CAPABLE OF FILTERING 8 OZ. /SQ. YD. ® 80
GPM.
6. STAGING AREAS AND MATERIAL STOCKPILES FOR THIS PROJECT ARE TO BE LOCATED TO PREVENT
SOIL AND SEDIMENT LOSS. STOCKPILES OF FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE ENCOMPASSED BY SILT FENCE
EXCEPT FOR THE POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE STOCKPILE AREA.
7. STOCKPILE EXCAVATED MATERIAL UPGRADIENT OF THE WATER LINE TRENCH WHEREVER POSSIBLE.
8. ROAD SCREENINGS SHALL BE PLACED ON PAVED SURFACES IF EXCAVATED MATERIAL IS PLACED IN
ROADWAYS. CLEAN UP OF ROADWAY MUST OCCUR IMMEDIATELY AFTER PIPE INSTALLATION.
9. BORROW AND WASTE UTILIZING AN OFF -SITE FACILITY MUST BE AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL
PLAN SITE, A SITE REGULATED UNDER THE MINING ACT OF 1971, OR A LANDFILL REGULATED BY THE
DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT. DEBRIS FROM DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DISPOSED
OF AT AN APPROVED FACILITY.
10. CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SEPARATE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND OBTAIN
APPROVAL FOR ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE PERMITTED LIMITS OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT USED
FOR STOCK PILING, STAGING, ETC. IF SUCH AREAS OCCUR ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, THE CONTRACTOR
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER TO UTILIZE
THE PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG WITH THE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN APPROVAL.
11. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN ADDITION TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS MAY BE
REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS IN ORDER TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT AND WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE CONTRACTOR.
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT ADVANCE OPEN TRENCH MORE THAN 200 FEET AHEAD OF INSTALLED PIPE.
UTILITY COORDINATION:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT NC ONE -CALL AT 1 -800- 632 -4949 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UTILITIES OR IF FURTHER VERIFICATION OF FACILITIES OR
TEMPORARY DISRUPTION OF SERVICE IS NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AND SHALL FULLY COORDINATE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS
WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY.
3. ANY MONUMENTA11ON DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT AND PROTECT ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCH EXCAVATION AND /OR PIPE INSTALLATION.
5. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE USE OF THE
CONTRACTOR IN PROVIDING PROTECTIONS FOR THE UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE TOWN OF
BOONE, DESIGN CONSULTANT, AND /OR AGENT SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
ACCURACY OR LOCATION, SIZE, DEPTH OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION. BEFORE BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT EACH OF THE UTILITY OWNERS IN THE AREA OF
CONSTRUC1ION RELATIVE TO THEIR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL
UTLI11ES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND /OR RELATED WORK OF THE
CONTRACTOR OR HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE TOWN OF BOONE HARMLESS FOR
ANY INCONVENIENCE OR DELAY CAUSED BY THE OPERATIONS OF OTHERS PERFORMING THE ABOVE
WORK. NECESSARY ADJUSTMENT OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, EXCEPT FOR CONTRACT
ITEMS, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHERS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SATISFACTORY PROGRESS OF THE
PROJECT.
OMITTED A
OMITTED
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
DRAWING SCALE
AS SHOWN
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
�WK (828) 327 -6911
�D'��VO� NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
DRAWN BY
JAI
PROJECT DATE
MARCH 2015
APPROVALS
- - --
BIDDING
- - --
APPROVED BY
BLT
PROJECT NUMBER
80376.00.H1
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
FILE NAME
80376_BOONE RAW
WL-DETAILS.DWG
RECORD DWG.
- - --
.ls
MAPPING: LEGEND
FIELD AND AERIAL SURVEY. VERTICAL DATUM ESTABLISHED BY W.K. DICKSON. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD
EXISTING
PROPOSED
VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS SUCH AS ROADS, STREAM AND PIPE INVERTS, AND REPORT ANY
DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
SURFACE WATERS SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET HAVE BEEN FIELD LOCATED & IDENTIFIED. A JURISDICTIONAL
_R/W
RIGHT -OF -WAY
DETERMINATION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE USACE ON NOVEMBER 21ST, 2011 FOR THE FEATURES IDENTIFIED
TO BE IMPACTED.
-SBACK
SETBACK
- - - -
THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL IS BASED ON NC GRID NAD83 IN US SURVEY FEET. THIS PROJECT WAS
PE
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PE
GROUND LOCALIZED ABOUT NCGS MONUMENT "HAMPTON ":
CE
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
_CE -
N = 905736.03'
E = 1211369.29' q
PDE
PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
-PDE
COMBINED FACTOR = 0.999866297
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
INDEX CONTOUR
100
G
ALL COORDINATES ARE GROUND COORDINATES IN US SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
- -
INTERVAL CONTOUR
96
SURVEY ALONG BROWNWOOD ROAD CONSISTING OF EDGE OF PAVEMENT, PROPERTY LINES, AND PARCEL
c - -
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
DATA PROVIDED BY AB CHRISTIE SURVEYORS AS PERFORMED IN FEBRUARY - MARCH, 2014.
®
STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
OD
STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE
CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE:
- - - -
ROOF DRAIN
RD
HYDROLOGIC FEATURE
THE FOLLOWING SEQUENECE DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL ACTIONS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR, ONLY A
X
FENCE
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT SEQUENCE.
1. OBTAIN ALL APPROVALS NECESSARY TO BEGIN AND COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
T T
GUARDRAIL
- - - --
2. CONDUCT PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING INCLUDING OWNER, ENGINEER, ASSOCIATED CONTRACTORS,
RAILROAD LINE
-f
--+-
NCDENR REPRESENTATIVES, AND OTHER AFFECTED PARTIES.
m
SIGN
T
3. FLAG THE WORK LIMITS, AND BUFFER AREAS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR PROTECTION. CLEAR AND
CURB AND GUTTER
GRUB ONLY AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.
CONCRETE WALK/PAD
4. INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AS SHOWN SHALL BE INSTALLED.
HEAVY -DUTY ASPHALT
5. THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ADJUST AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY.
D
LIGHT
STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS USING TEMPORARY SEEDING MEASURES IN LOCATIONS AS NECESSARY.
-DUTY ASPHALT
�_
EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED PER GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON SHEET GO.5.
- - -6•FM- - -
FORCE MAIN
FM
6. ALONG NEW HIGHWAY 421: CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE REQUIRED JACK AND BORE INSTALLATIONS
- -6'66- - -
GRAVITY SEWER
SS
PRIOR TO WATER LINE INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY POSITIVE SHORING
AND TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES PARTICULARLY THOSE NOTED IN DETAIL 3/C4.29.
®
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
0
7. ESTABLISH FINAL VEGETATION.
C.O'a
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
0-
8. WITH APPROVAL OF E/S INSPECTOR, REMOVE ALL E/S CONTROLS.
- - -BB- - -
BOTTOM OF BANK
_BB-
- - - Te - - -
TOP OF BANK
TB
DITCH LINE
- - -GW- - -
OVERHEAD WIRE
OW
- - -UE- - -
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
UE
- - -FO- - -
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
FO
- - -4'G- - -
UNDERGROUND GAS
G
- - -T- - -
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UT
POWER POLE
f
)X
LIGHT POLE
X
GUY WIRE
SHRUB LINE
�.
TREE LINE
--- 6-W - --
WATER LINE
W
0
GATE VALVE
N
0
.WATER METER
■
-b-
FIRE HYDRANT
=F►�+-
PERMANENT DIVERSION DITCH
-�
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
-01 MD -0
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
-®-
TREE
0
SHRUB
0
SOIL BORE
ELEV x
SPOT ELEVATION
ELEV x
BENCHMARK' ELEVATION
CHECK DAM
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
Z
0
RIP -RAP
TEMPORARY SEEDING
TS
~
U
PERMANENT SEEDING
PS
0
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
®
TELEVISION PEDESTAL
U)
®
FIBER OPTIC PEDESTAL
z
°
MAILBOX
0
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LOD
0N
W
O.
U_
Q
U
Q
W
J
W
W
I-
O
Z
.
1
z
_0
U)
W
D
J
Q
_Z
LL
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
24" RAW WATER LINE
GENERAL NOTES
G4.0
G4.1

y 4
F-YU
W
�a
J W
w
zapo
N
0z 0
V 6wU
� FMW
Y2 Q
oo�N
VI .J
Y OUW
3F=N
0
V¢ U q
1-1-J W
=Z
OOV2
Qon w
GRAVEL SUBSTRATE
50 / 50 MIX OF IN SITU SOIL AND # 5 STONE
/--TOP OF BANK
/—BOTTOM OF B.
v L �
FLOW ►
e � O
00 0 O 0
l
BOTTOM OF BANK O
\—TOP OF BANK
SEE TYPICAL BANK
STABILIZATION DETAILS %
4/G0.7 AND 5/GO.7 d
A
GRADE CONTROL ROCK
50 / 50 MIX CLASS B / 1
RIP RAP
_
U �
o
z
v~) O
X I_
= m
� C
MAXIMUM
WIDTH OF DISTURBANCE
ALIMITED TO 10'
1 A
STREAM BED CONTROL — PLAN VIEW
MATCH EXISTING CHANNEL FULLBANK WIDTH
BANKFULL ELEVATION
1.5' MIN. INVERT SET AT
PROFILE GRADE
� w
FILTER 2.5'
-
FABRIC � TYP.
GRAVEL SUBSTRATE -- GRADE CONTROL ROCK
50 / 50 MIX OF IN 50 / 50 MIX CLASS B / 1
SITU SOIL AND # 5 RIP RAP
STONE
STREAM BED CONTROL — SECTION A— A
TOP OF RIFFLE
(SEE PROFILE
FOR DESIGN ELEV.) SLOPE VARIES
O7�7n(,mr
FILTER --
FABRIC GRAVEL SUBSTRATE
50 / 50 MIX OF IN SITU
SOIL AND # 5 STONE
BANKFULL ELEVATION
FLOW —
DESIGN BED
SURFACE
GRADE CONTROL ROCK —I
50 / 50 MIX CLASS B / 1 RIP
RAP
STREAM BED CONTROL — PROFILE B —B
2.5'
z
z =
Q =
0
z Y
w _j
X m
W -J
J
_ Z) B
U L-
F-
2.5'�
SEE TYPICAL BANK
STABILIZATION DETAILS
4/G0.7 AND 5/G0.7
BOTTOM OF RIFFLE —
(MATCH EXISTING ELEV.)
I-1.0'
1/2 DIAMETER OF PIPE OR -
12', WHICHEVER IS GREATER
NC DDT #5 OR
WASHED STONED
25 IM N.
TOP OF BANK —
2
T
NC DDT #5 OR #57
MASHED STONED
(6' MIN.)
SEE DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR
NUMBER OF PIPES REQUIRED,
r� PIPE SIZE, AND PIPE MATERIAL.
i- CLASS II EROSION STONE
ELEVATI ❑N
PLAN
Y CREEK
NOT TO SCALE
USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH
SLOPE PROTECTION,
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL
BLANKET, BONDED FIBER MATTRESS
OR SOIL STABILIZERS
RAFIT, ink
CLASS II EROSION STONE
�2•�•i•� •1
.•.•.•.•.•.•..,
501C
_ XCESS SOCK MATERIAL
)RAWN IN AND TIED OFF
FO 2 "x2" WOODEN
>TAKE, (TYP.)
"i
"8" FILTER SOCK ---
OPTION "A" PLAN OPTION "B" PLAN
WIRE TIES, (TYP.)
STORM GRATE
8" FILTER SOCK
DRAIN INLET- PLAN
8" FILTER SOCK ---\
DRAIN INLET- SECTION
2" X 2" X 36" WOODEN
STAKES PLACED 5' O.C.
CROSS PATTERN ABOVE SOCK
1:1 MAX. SLOPE
8" DIAMETER FILTER SOCK (TYP.)
PROTECTED AREA
USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH SECTION
SLOPE PROTECTION,
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, 10 L.F. PER END PLACED AT A 30' ANGLE
BONDED FIBER MATTRESS OR SOIL
PR
STABILIZERS TO EVENT END — AROUND FLOW
DISTURBED AREA
EL. 120,, _ — — 10'
EL. 115` 304
8" DIAMETER FILTER SOCK (TYP.) --
EL. 110. 12" MIN
EL. 105,`
EL. 100 ALWAYS INSTALL SOCK
PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE
2" X 2" X 36" WOODEN PROTECTED AREA
STAKES PLACED 5' O.C.
CROSS PATTERN ABOVE SOCK
NOTES: PLAN
1. SLOPE INTERUPTION SHALL BE USED ON DISTURBED AREAS
HAVING A SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER.
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE SOCK
WHEN ACCULATION HAS REACHED 1/2 OF EFFECTIVE HEIGHT
OF SOCK.
3. LOOSE FILTER MEDIA MAY BE BACKFILLED ON THE UPSLOPE
SIDE OF THE SOCK TO ENHANCE PERFORMANCE.'
3 SLOPE INTERUPTION
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
DRAWING SCALE
AS SHOWN
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
�WK (828) 327 -6911
/w� /� NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
W D'! _ K` OA'
\V_ _�V7 'v Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
DRAWN BY
JKI
PROJECT DATE
MARCH 2014
BIDDING
- - --
APPROVED BY
BLT
PROJECT NUMBER
80376.00.H1
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
FILE NAME
80376 —BOONE RAW
WL—DETAILS.DWG
RECORD DWG.
# ###
"9o,.
a ®��• !
� �
Pfl
d
�d ®dSddi088fl@8g�
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
•0 FLOW
CULVERT PIPE
EXESS SOCK MATERIAL TO
BE DRAWN IN AND TIED OFF
2 "x2" WOODEN STAKE _
EXCESS SOCK MATERIAL
DRAWN IN AND TIED OFF
TO 2 "x2" WOODEN
STAKE, (TYP.)
`8" FILTER SOCK
CULVERT INLET- PLAN
CURB 8" FILTER SOCK
SECURE TO GRATE WITH
RUBBER TIE DOWNS
CATCH'
BASIN
CURBSIDE SECTION
NOTES:
1. ALL MATERIAL TO MEET SPECIFICATIONS.
2. FILTER MEDIA FILL TO MEET APPLICATIONS REQUIREMENTS.
3. COMPOST MATERIAL TO BE DISPERSED ON SITE, AS DETERMINED
BY ENGINEER.
4 INLET PROTECTION
NOT TO SCALE
An
JIM
STATION
STABILIZATION
START
END
MATTING TYPE
0 +00
43 +75
MULCH /GRASS
43 +75
46 +50
STRAW NETTING
46 +50
80 +00
MULCH /GRASS
80 +00
83 +50
STRAW NETTING
83 +50
111 +50
MULCH /GRASS
111 +50
120 +25
"STRAW NETTING
120 +25
122 +00
MULCH /GRASS
122 +00
127+00
STRAW NETTING
127 +00
133 +50
MULCH /GRASS
133 +50
147 +50
STRAW NETTING
147 +50
506+00
MULCH /GRASS
506 +00
526 +50
STRAW NETTING
526 +50
531 +00
MULCH /GRASS
531 +00
561+00
STRAW NETTING
561 +00
618 +04
MULCH /GRASS
NOTES:
1. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE
NEEDED BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.
2. IN AREAS OF STREAM CROSSINGS REFER TO DETAIL
1/G4.1 FOR MATTING REQUIREMENTS.
24" RAW WATER LINE
STREAM RESTORATION AND EC DETAILS
Z
_0
F-
H!^
vl
z
0
rvol
0
LU
W
W
O
0
z
1
z
J
Q
z
LL
■
G4.1
G4.1

V, <
�YU
15
0
roz
Z�<
Ww�
ZN�
OU
W0W
F_�
4 <
o -�
Sam
OFF z*0
"-----bW-----6..W ----- 6„W ----- 6„W ----- ----- 6,•W ----- 6"W ----- 6"W ----- 6••W ----- 6••W ----- 6••W ----- 6••1y ----- 6••W ----- 6•yy ----- 6 „1y ----- 6••W ----- 6••W ----- 6 „W ----- 6••1y ----- 6••W ----- 6••W ----- 6••V/ ----- 6 „W ----- 6••W ----- 6••W ----- 6•,W ___
ll ° v ao \ CROSS UNDER 6" WATER LINE I h N O MANHOLE
= 3098.83' \
N m I� - - MAINTAIN 12" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE \ " Nv. IN ®3os3ar - -qc1 - - carar sAAN - - CROSS UNDER 4" SEWER LINE MARY ANN TRIVETTE
3 \1 IN V. our = 3093.39' yp TOP 91 1:-- -
i7ii vrESr, Er AL
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 - - - - .�- �tc� _ �� _ MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE P8: 8 PC: 120
- SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23. - - - - - - - _ _ - -
1 \ I CROSS UNDER 18 CMP » EX. 8" SANITARY SEWER - \ /
ail REPLACE EX. 4 PVC S.S WITH 20 - 4 DIP, SrA: 11 +861 \ \\
MAINTAIN 18° MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE / \ II / �' 10' EACH SIDE OF CROSSING. CONNECTIVITY LOCATION AND "
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 / /� II y y y y y y y _ MATERIAL UNKNOWN. 1 - PROP. 24 RJ 22.5' BEND \
0 +00 Y / II� \ y y y y y y
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY. N: 904930.49 \
LOD ASPHALTBARK /NG / Sn � y y
TOWN OF a00NE a y y
lop / y y TOM OF BOONE ' E: 1217444\37\
1+ I'd / D8: 0- - 086 �. CROSS UNDER. -- 1 / y y y \
« I _ _ OO- - -' " LOD \ OB: 423 PC 081 �-,.
_ / PIN: 2970 -74 -6149 -000 y PIN. 2910 -74 -5278 °000 e y y _ SEE NOTE 4.
°aZO' I - _ / = - -- 2 +00 ��-- LW'-�J In °II L \� y y y y y y y y y y �. / STA: 11 +36f
Roza EXISTING r6 °0 RAW - �� 3 +00 - ---.�_ _LOI'T� ( / bll\ \- ( y y y y y y y y y 'y -y \y ` ,` , BEGIN 24" IAMETER \ 2
aS I III / _ _ _ �- _ - - -� - - - - - - cRavEl WALKWAY
\ 12' OFF S.S. y y y y - _ (RESTRAINED JOINT DI WA ER LINE \ t STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
d WATER LINE y •� " y y
S" OW / i'' - �1- S-. _ �� - - °�4 +00 Lam- \ y y y y Vi£TL!✓J AREA ' �, �" y y .y . y y y y y at / \ APPALACHIAN DR: 1} PC 580 UNIVERSITY
GRAVEL PARKING h -' = -. -• -SS_ -.. - - - -�.._L a 0 �, y y � ( y y IC
Z H i - __ -�' g - -- S +OO \� _✓ �y� v y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
� -.._ y y y y y y y y �•-_/ y y y a PLV: 2910 -66- 8824 -000
w> OPEN CUT ASPHALT. --I 1 p98 ' / �� - - - �"� - - \ s L I BOW SEE DETAIL SHEET C4.14 I '� - ASPHALT ENTRANCE 20' EASEMENT - - _ �Jt Si'---- ? - i OO _ _ ___ y y y y y y ^y y y m y y y y y y y \ N
°o O O Z £
TOWN DB 100. PCN9 W 1�'�_Wi'_..,�� % +O
a
< y ° SS MANHOLE '
o O �17I1Y y, y Z -
?o 0 0 TOP RIM = ..310238' cll -•�,� - _ - `" --�-.' 8•(� �- - - �1. y y \
t- y ( O0- y y \ \
Z PROP. INLET - ____4
II _ ❑ - �.� '�� ` y y \ \ \ y y v ' t \ }
sGmW E PROTECTION, TYP. y y y y y
owom EXISTING 76 "0 RAW II - - - I� ,._ SS MANHOLE \��• �t \ � � � � .9� �` ` �.'�` • \ � y y
v oz� SEE DETAIL 4/134.1 TOP RIM = 3099.70' O y y
x a < •
--.WA LINE _ � o(}� � \
° N w J ` �' INV. OUT m 3089.25' ` \ \ �` \ '�'.•�/ y / ° \ \
y II -I-
IN = 391.70' \ \ ',y Q
EX. 8 SANITARY SEWER
Trop MANHOLE I 100.08• CROSS UNDER 30" CMP QO \ 0O L h / o \ 4' H
CONNECTIVITY LOCATION AND NV. IN =3090.58' ❑ ` `�\`` hh -� / I € 1\ °'
< MATERIAL UNKNOWN. » Exisr. 19° CONC.. _ \ \ rn
INV. IN 4' PVC - 309778 MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE SANITARY SEWER �\� \\ � \
} CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY. -__ - INV. our= 3089.98 ❑ / I F �1\
�m R - �... SEE DETAIL F/C4.13 I ° \\\�\ % (T1
° �< CROSS UNDER. o \ D
Ooo1n --� -' _ PROP. 24 DIP RAW WATER LINE ❑ 0p Loo
ga6� ---- _... __ _... SEE NOTE 4. '' - »
STA: 1 +55f - - 3 FT. MIN. COVER. � \ 1 /1 13
�xsl f END 24" DIAMETER -- - s - -s -- �--
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE - -- _ C!?
PROP. TEMP. P-SILT' SS MANHOLE = z
�n1''s` �� i I ""'---- • • • SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER TOP RIM = 3099.26' rn
STA: O +OOf FENCE, TYPICAL. ' • 1
NOTES: SEE DETAIL 2/GO.6 ` - -- -- - (TI
\..:�••. � �,M BEGIN 24 DIAMETER "'-- -... .; �
'�•.. RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE � � ""`- -- •..
"- �... 1. PROVIDE 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER LINE AND STORM PIPES. REPLACE ORNAMENTAL
STA: 0+00± 2. CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO PROPER PRE - CONSTRUCTION CONDITION ALL UTILITIES `- - TREES AS NECESSARY -.,•
t BEGIN CONSTRUCTION - DIVISION 4 (STORM DRAINAGE, ETC.) AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED ® TRIBUTARY 8, IMPACT S1
\ 1 - PROP. 16" TAPPING SLEEVE, SEE DETAIL 3/C4.27 ofM of SCONE . 46 I I
/ WATER LINE. OB.' 553 PG 46s
- PROP. 16" RJ GATE VALVE, SEE DETAIL 1/C4.27 PIN: 2910 -74- 9489 -000 SEE DETAILS 1/G4.1 AND 2- 5/GO.7.
- 24" RJ REDUCER 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE TOWN OF BOONE FOR ACCESS TO THE PROJECT DUE TO TROUT MORATORIUMS, ANY I
AREA BETWEEN STA 16 +00 AND STA 33 +00. ACCESS MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THIS
PAVED WALKING TRAIL. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING TRAIL SHALL BE RESTORED TO EXISTING PAVED WALKING TRAIL STREAM IS PROHIBITED DURING THE
I PRE - CONSTRUCTION CONDITION OR BETTER. SEE NOTE 3 PERIOD BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 15.
PROPOSED ANTI '•'-- ---- --
4. WHERE INDICATED ABOVE, EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIVITY AND MATERIAL ARE
SEEPAGE COLLAR, TYP.
UNKNOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND MATERIAL MINIMUM 18" SEE DETAIL 5/C4.23
VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHEN CROSSING. IF EXISTING 8" LINE IS NOT /
\ DIP; CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE EXISTING LINE WITH 20' - 8" DIP, 10' EACH SIDE OF
FLOODWAY 1144178
CROSSING. _____..._...____... _..._...- ...- ... -... -.
J STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
t M 11 PG. 580
PIN: 2910 -66 -8824 -000
�0��� PROP. 10' PERMANENT / o M of aooN£- -... / 23 +p0` �\ o \\ \,
/ EASEMENT I j 20' EASEMENT :.
D.B. 100, PC. 2 'O / _SS -_ \� \ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
r _ - - - - - 22k0- / �5s' ��. \ PROP. TEMP. SILT. APPALACHIAN. STATE UNIVERSITY '
PROP. WIRE AND STONE / / ) 1 ! L / tss 2 \ FENCE, TYPICAL. `
OR T1 Pc: 5eo
t �`/' A� O PIN: 2910 -66- 8824 -000
F� J EX. 20' SEWER EASEMENT /'' / ss, \ x �\
����� SEE DETAIL 2
J O w - REINFORCED OUTLET, TYPE 1 I / it ,ss' -'j e0 ( p \ /130.6 c
INSTALLED AT LOW POINT. 1 /... / / / / �s\, \ �\ �'� _ =
SEE DETAIL 4/130.5 -TA \
s' 1 O S / Zss TOP RIM S 30985' \\ I / STA: 15 +021 PROP. HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL i \ + ( ( j ` ` 00 ss ' / 100 YEAR �✓oPU N \\\ m '/ \
DRILL EXIT POINT Q \ !
BEGIN 24" DIAMETER HDPE WATER LINE ss '�/
BY HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL _Ss'' \O�
2 SEE DETAIL 4/C4.23 } ( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \. SS MANHOLE\
A In I C) I \ \ \ h - / / TOP RIM - 3098,26' \ \ Z
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA \\
APPALACHIAN STATE STA: 15+02± } l J '11 I �I / ' \ \ \ \ h \ h h h h 9x00 N "` - / ut I l \ \ \\ \ O
OBUNIVERSITY I ., 580 END 24" DIAMETER / l Iv! �ll(I qy 1 \\ h
PM: 2910- 66- E824-000 RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE } / 11 \'� a�! %G q / \ �) STA: 21 +631
/ �, (ii , BEGIN 24 DIAMETER }
SANITARY a• PVC < - o �� ` // 11 k0� ss, RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
SANITARY SEWER 'V' m q ` \
WIRROX /MATE LOCA770N)
/ 1 ssi STA: 22 +631 I I I I
CROSS UNDER 8" SEWER LINE e m ° i I / �<= 4 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND \ 1 I o4 / I !
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE p ( 11 / TO MANHOLE N: 905925.26 + I '
U 5 \ Op ss'� TOP RIM = 3098.31' E• 121721 0.70 i I, I N � 1 I 1 � \ � Z
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23. / N \•'9 1�k �,'/ SS MANHOLE 1Ij III I) I I I STA 25 +221 ' O
REPLACE EX. 8" PVC S.S WITH 20' - 8" DIP, f��it it l TOP RIM - 3097.92' I I i t 1 ( 1 -PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND
10' EACH SIDE OF CROSSING. I aJ /(ll Ia. eI '. ` 1 Iss'' U
s �/ STA: 23 +841
' �/� 8' OFF S.S. 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 22.5' BEND i I C1 Ii 1 1 I ' N: 906092.78 .4
SS MANHOLE M / q x0 s I I it I 1 I E: 1217398.48
TOP RIM = 3099.17' / I - - !/ � X16 i Y E•• 12017279.48 I I I (( i I i ' , I O
8' PVC /NV /N = 390.84' \ / Q I}g \ I U-
CL INV. = 3089.19' �, / ' ( O EXIST. 18' CONC. i STA: 26 +22f
/ / STA: 19 +28f SAN17ARY SEWER I I ( J I
, I I END 24" DIAMETER
PROP. HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL \ / / 1 END 24" DIAMETER I I ( I t I w
o - \ o RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
DRILL ENTRY POINT \ k o RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE I I I 1 �o I I (n
50 X 75 HORIZONTAL i i
DIRECTIONAL DRILL STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA I I �\ I I I ' ° '
100' X 150' HORIZONTAL / j / APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY I \ cVm I I I W
/ 1f1/// RECEIVING AREA DG- 11 PG: 580 I \ 1 I I
PIN. 2910 -66- 8824 -000 I i PROP. WIRE AND STONE
I
DIRECTIONAL DRILL - TOP RIM MANHOLE 1 ; \ 1 I REINFORCED OUTLET TYPE 1
/ TOP RIM = 3o9a.a4' STA: 16 +77f \\ I I I I INSTALLED AT LOW POINT.
LAUNCH AREA �, /y / ' I I \ 1 I � W
v BEGIN 24" DIAMETER \ 1 I ll
18' AERIAL SEWER RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE i I 11 1 I SEE DETAIL 4/130.5
r WITH 30' CASING
STA: 16 +771 O
END 24" DIAMETER HDPE WATER LINE
/ a j BY HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL
RIVER CROSSING #1 SEE DETAIL 4/C4.23
SEE DETAIL 4/C4.23 AND C4.22 03'11\
s
`ipss / STA: 15 +021
1 -PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND i ( /it
jN: 905163.95 ' (( ( �o 1 { / \ �\
SEFOSe YOU Oa E: 1217231.87
STOP SFF gTCy I % MATCH LINE GRAPHIC SCALE Q
NC. ONE-CALL / SEE SHEET C4.2 513' 25,. G. 25' Sp' _z
ItT'i 'Ins u►w S F l i / LL ,
1" = 50'
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE ,jj % OM -!I
RWH 1 " =50' o`t''•'f� AS'
• HICKORY, NC 28602 a ^ Q e.e...e o< �e
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE �WK (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS ---- �`�yc%,.•'F�,$$ %.
JKI MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE NO. F -0374 ____
DICKS0N BIDDING }
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER �. i S °s
BLT 80376.00.HI Office Locations:
ME NAME community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION - - -- w 0 a
80376 80ONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO ROUND.OW'G South Carolina D
RECORD DWG. -- -- �, °•.'vGtNE�;P° m °tl
�4 .q/v >.K�( ���03 /� I5
24" RAW
WATER
LINE
5
REVISED CROSSING IMPACT LABEL PER NCDENR COMMENTS
2/17/15
4
REVISED COORDINATE PRECISION
2/12/15
3
ADDED EASEMENT NUMBERS
3/18/14
2
MINIMUM STORM DRAINAGE SEPARATION REVISED PER NCDOT
10/16/12
1
EROSION CONTROL REVISIONS PER NCDENR
8/14/12
REV. N0.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE ,jj % OM -!I
RWH 1 " =50' o`t''•'f� AS'
• HICKORY, NC 28602 a ^ Q e.e...e o< �e
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE �WK (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS ---- �`�yc%,.•'F�,$$ %.
JKI MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE NO. F -0374 ____
DICKS0N BIDDING }
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER �. i S °s
BLT 80376.00.HI Office Locations:
ME NAME community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION - - -- w 0 a
80376 80ONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO ROUND.OW'G South Carolina D
RECORD DWG. -- -- �, °•.'vGtNE�;P° m °tl
�4 .q/v >.K�( ���03 /� I5
24" RAW
WATER
LINE
C4.1
ST 0 +00
TO STA.
28 +50
4.42,

\ . STA: 29 +24f "
' x 2 \.,. "
°3w \..�... 1 - PROP. 24 RJ 22.5' BEND �\ CROSS UNDER 8 SEWER LINE
0oz \\ \ MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
z � < N: 905973.73
�`\ \.., SS MANHOLE SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
V w SO�Ty FORS �.. \1.\ STA9129 +751 roP RIM = 3MZ89' STA: 34 +92f NOTE:
1 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH
\ N��y END 24 DIAMETER END 24 DIAMETER HDPE WATER LINE THE TOWN OF BOONE AND WATAUGA
F Qj COUNTY SCHOOLS FOR ACCESS TO
t/ER RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE BY HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL THE PROJECT AREA BETWEEN
-- \ SS MANHOLE
N ,_� �. �_. SEE DETAIL 4/C4.23
n� W 1 TOP RIM = 3106.04' STA 16 +00 AND STA 33 +00.
ffio - - - - \ STA: 30 +701 s° O/P /NV. our = 3092.66' PROP. HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL STA: 44 +97f
ogo /- \ BEGIN 24 DIAMETER STA: 34 +921 END 24 DIAMETER
FAN / DRILL EXIT POINT
< - / \ \ Y ? RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE BEGIN 24" DIAMETER _3rr5-_ RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
°a o`
°a \ / RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE -3rr0 �`� - _ 50' X 75' HORIZONTAL
DIRECTIONAL DRILL
_ - - - ..._`.. STA: 44 +471
ow / /-_- _ ;� ��\�, "STA: 34 +92f _3ioo; `,� - - - RECEIVING AREA PROP.' TEMP. SILT "
o RCY 1 -PROP. 24 RJ 45' BEND - ` - - - °5 " FENCE TYPICAL. 1 -PROP. 24
oP R _SEE DETAIL 2 130.6
wiw rae_ a �..- - \- - Aa c RJ 225 BAND / Cn
\�
w�� (c i ,,\ a� N: 905709.94 _ - \� \ = /
W o �» 81 \ 1y E: 1218238.06 -6.s- \ \ \\ + _ �...�s E: 128999.54 �.�
�i w y ; 29100` A�°HgLTWA(h /NG 390 \ - STA. 37 +421 STA: 39 +49f
JQOO ; 3p TAaL K a+x \ aacd _ ,3 `t - - �� '= - - _ _..._ END 24" DIAMETER500 wAR FL END 24" DIAMETER
6.s �> x S _ JOINT DI - _OODPLAN
�0, 6 ��
RESTRAINED _...- - ... RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
RESTRA i' LINE
\ \ \ -- - _
\. � �\ � •�- -.. � -,_ - .- P �. .• ;.F ,'
1- .,..,, •,..� �. `3 �s _. � x"30 \\ / �. \mss ,' �.� \ ._,_, •-.._. � roo WAR FL -.. STA: 42 +52f
_ - _ TER
' �0p \ \� / �\\\\� z6. I \ \... �3gX - - PROP. WIRE AND STURC"* -... __.._ -... 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND
''JFm W Z - - -��. 5`S - / / ?��� \'� \ ! \ Z �.'' o'� \ Op ` �-� " _ ` REINFORCED OUTLET, TYPE 1
vZ�ic &�. (") -. -.- - - '_- ��"•t \ _,6.s` ` a ° (- - ''�S� \\ \` / yO�O / )6 \l�e> -\ \ � ... \ ` `
INSTALLED AT LOW POINT. N: 905227.50 - - - ..3` '.✓ o � .�•/ +� / ///
��a= t� .- - _`` •"`�.. •` ' \ - -"v \ .J \ \\ J� DC' . \ / '•-�- `' \ E: 1218813.00 _- _- _ -..-,� -- ,.-..� •.'� "".- O / //� / / //
°y"� _ _ -- - - -°°� 2�pp \\ / �/ S,'E/ ��� // �� SEE DETAIL 4/130.5
- ``_'�... �- ..,�„�� - '� �R`� ,`' PIP ! �� ` •�\ \ .•. .
/ \ - - - - - PROP. 10 PERMANENT
-3095- \ 6.s \ \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ Y - i
1 Ei�/ \�\I i p0 EASEMENT
oa�z� SS MANHOLE \�>.G'BKj \ 'SS�� �-- X33 0 / \\ �-�.. �..� \ '
`- - �' � � � � + � _.- -•�... 9 OFF S.S. - - - - - - - - -� ,,• .// vn�• // /
Az
TOP RIM = 309 /
wz �' �, \ �� By`� \ \ /yS/ ,\ \\: \\ �'• '`' •�, - -` ..-- �..YVMf1i__ ^'~ '^- _` - - - - - - - "` - -''` f/ I �r i / / /
7.48'
a�`iz -..._ -• '` \.\ \ 6 \ 1' ' �� \ /� �� \\ .. EX. 20' SEWER EASEMENT SPNALT - -c!%"' ..�• /// '. / t A /
v °ooa '- �.` \ \ aP� 5 \\� \\ \ 8Xp - •_. - 3095 -- / i i ,/ <
�\ _
$p - - - -
��... TO MANHOLE TOWN OF BOONE /.- - - Xx
TOP RIM = 3097.14' ,--. "- _.. \ \ � -� `. --'
8' DIP INV. IN - J088. IX - - .- - -. Ai / .•� / i /// %
-� \_ ,_•_ 20" EASEMENT
18' CONC. INV. OUT - 3087.35' • _ . r • --- `�� \ \ - D.B. 100, PG 2
- - --
3090 -� � - - - - - 40 +00 -'
STA: 28 +74f \... \ \ \ \ - - '.. �
----
BEGIN 24" DIAMETER -- 6.s - - - -- - - - - - -_- 55 �` 3090 /
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE \.., \.__ '� _ �-- ---SS- - - - -SS - -- SS - -__ /
\... \ . \ `= = - SS_____S5_____gg____ SS_____ r_.• SS -_ 5 /
\ SS_ _
STA: 32 +48f \... \...
1 - PROP. 24" RJ GATE VALVE �.. "� RIVER CROSSING #2 �� V
PROP. 24" DIP RAW WATER LINE \ SEE DETAIL 4/C4.23 AND C .22
I
3 FT. MIN. COVER. �... \\ / - - - - - - -
STA: 33 +211 /... --.,.. \ TOPMRIM - 3095.99'
\" 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND �OpDy \
100 X 150 HORIZONTAL \ �.- aruMi>s EXIST. 18' CONC.
DIRECTIONAL DRILL SS MANHO LE N: 905696.95 STA: 38 +49f �` SANITARY SEWER LAUNCH AREA TOP RIM 83096.96• \ E• 1218067.91 . BEGIN 24" DIAMETER ' �\\ STA: 38 +991 �..� -' -' `' • /
_ "�- PROP. 24" RJ 22.5' BEND / '� / HONEYCUTrIHUTCHENS
PROP. HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL \... RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE LAUREL MOUNTAIN ESTATES
Ao STA: 33 +21 t \... E; 2054 05.75 - -- ... -- -- ' /
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DRILL ENTRY POINT " ~ -''� i De: bob cc 148
4 so• END 24 DIAMETER ` / PIN: 2910 -94 -0824 -000 SS STA: 33 +211 �9sF A RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER /LINE TOP RIM - 3096.44 \
BEGIN 24" DIAMETER HDPE WATER LINE �ti STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA >F \...\ UTH FORK NEW RlU STA: 41 +531 /
100
T APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY - "�-� LOODP • � • '-"'�-
BY HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL OB: it PG: 580 BEGIN 24 DIAMETER
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
SEE DETAIL 4/C4,23 PIN: 2910 -66- 8824 -000 \ \\
C ' ' \
/ PROP. HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL \ TOWN OF BOONE
DRILL ENTRY POINT \ \ 20' EASEMENT 100, PG. I
\ .PS 18' EXPOSED PIPE
NOTES: STA: 60 +56f \
1 - PROP. 24" RJ 11.25' BEND \� \ \ x STA: 60 +611 -
\\
1. PROVIDE 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER N: 906481.34 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND
E: 1219062.66 \ \ N: 906486.21
LINE AND STORM PIPES. � I / / \ , I \ -
E: 1219061.56
���, 100' X 150' HORIZONTAL \ Y
2. CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO PROPER PRE - CONSTRUCTION r8"
LOW ` '\� '•. 3085
- � �y DIRECTIONAL DRILL 24' wluow. \ `" \\
CONDITION ALL UTILITIES (STORM DRAINAGE, ETC.) AFFECTED BY I A '- / / LAUNCH AREA 24' WILLOW \ \ \ \ '
CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED WATER LINE. I I a Y 26' w/L'OW; \ \ s MANHOLE
WATAUGA CO NIY / „q \ ` \ �� \ P RIM 3094 49
Pe: 020 PG. 445 CROSS UNDER 18" SEWER LINE \ \ m\ 18 CONIC INV. 1N = 3084.95
PoN: 2910 -BB -1456 -000
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE TOWN OF BOONE FOR / ^
MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
ACCESS TO THE PROJECT AREA BETWEEN STA 35 +00 AND STA \ \ c 6� / ij//jj j
8' OFF S.S. ; SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 \�� \\\ \\ 6okp0 /,s s6. \ �xop ' / / /j�
MATCH 61 +00. ACCESS MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH EXISTING PAVED �
LINE WALKING TRAIL. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING TRAIL SHALL BE �y 18' AERIAL SEWER
SEE THIS SHEET RESTORED TO PRE - CONSTRUCTION CONDITION OR BETTER. I / / WITH 30" CASING
� I II I III,;
59k.
It /
/ a / .. /R �P / - 18 AERIAL SEWER
1�1 11 III VIII � 2 _
OII II Y /
OF NORTH CAROLINA / / /, 90 _! ,55 / WITH 30' CASING /
'p STATE / F" 013 000 /
APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY
/
, I' DB: 11 PG: 580
0 PIN: 2910 -66 -8824 -000
I
ry` OODP
foo Do FLW.PROP. 10' PERMANENT / '
EASEMENT / / /
LAUREL MOUNTAIN ESTATES I .I " (+� OIL / X55''' SS MANHOLE Z
FAIAKY LIMl TEO PARTNERSHIP \ STA: 50 +96f ._- / / / 1ZS..' �k /
OB.' 408 PG- 148 I I „ //" V� 5 TOP RIM ®3095.61'
\ I � 1 -PROP. 24 RJ 2 .5' BEND /.- yEARa.� -- / / / / ,vr_ ,6.s' ,�'
PIN: 2910 -94- 0824 -000. ' G I "
\ I N: 905575.50 d C.)
I \ k G I E: 1219377.02 /�,;. % /'../ '//
STA: 46 +19f
BEGIN 24" DER LINE
IAIv�ETER
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WAT ' 1 /
>t
It
I ./' / / / / / 70 %N OF BOON£ / 5 /'' ,- /- / r �i"J�� / /'l
` 1 1:1 / /' / % % %' %�' LL
/
0.8. 100, PC t
' TOP RIM 309Z01P£' � 'O I I / / // / / / / / / � / n / 'r: i/ /ii!' /i' •• •
STA. 58 +091
STA: 50 +461 / ../ �'... / / / / / / / yk00/ 6.s, c BEGIN 24 DIAMETER /! / :�/ %j�:;/ - w
STA: 46+ 9t r I i� / / .. /, /
1 a I \ BEGIN 24 DIAMETER / / I / / / / / 5 RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE / / '''' % // -' (n
1 - PROP. 24" -RJ 11.25' B ND 1� t{ \' / / / / / / / y 6.s'' ®
1t t t RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE / / / / / / _Ss ,
N: 905267180 \\ v. 0'.. / , " /// LL)
_ HARDIN CREEK IMPACT S2 i % % �; i,'/ '
30 0 SEE DETAILS 1 /134.1 AN
E: 1219220110 b 7., \ \\Ng4.62 \. .� .../ 31 D / J Pq / / / PST S '6.s jY�
\ \ \�\ \'Thy ..-•' ,,, i / / b �` J 'S5'' TOPMR/M OL3096.03' DUE TO TROUT M9RATORIUMS, ANY -'- ' i / .i %,�:'.•- /' :' W
PROP. TEMP. SILT 0 CONSTRU TIflN ACTIVITY IN THIS
/
FENCE, TYPICAL. 3og IRE `o / / 5 3 1 / _6.s' 3090
IN 1 D \ \ \ \ \� F' / /'� / / / / 309 / ag-�5 STREA -PROHIBIT DURING THE
SEE DETAIL 2 TYPICAL.
sD� \ \\ \ \ ti - / / / % / / i / / / / Ewsr. 18' CONC. '/^ .. _ -
\ �. - / 5 0 / SANITARY SEWER B 15 AND APRIL 15.
`s� - PERIOD BETWEEN OCTOBER
PROP. WIRE AND STO E 4\ \ \ - = _ / ' _ g10% / 3 \0 / / / / / / s' l J e PAUr .� �IVE�
1\ \ �( y z / / ASPHALT k00 / n` i, ' ° NEW %� =s PROPOSED ANTI
REINFORCED OUTLET, TYPE11 52 s, �y EDRK / =° SEEPAGE COLLAR TYP.
INSTALLED' AT LOW POINT TOWN OF BOONE N _ - / _
T. N \ - -.- �1 - - -_-' / 6.l / •� ,,,. / / / fEYJ _ \ �.�- .:,4••..i .-^ T /'' r•,,,../'r ... -�.�„ -i}l, -S / /iii ` -.-
T 1 _ / 1 X�- /- O8 122 PG: 715 /- %i
SEE DETAIL 4/130.5\ -49 +0 � " .50 + +00 �OU SEE DETAIL 5/C4.23
\- "-PIN: 2910 95 -2783
v - - - --= - - - ..-•• �k0 16.. ' °�. -•__ •/ �,;
STA: 48 +0 f Ss ., - = _ - - - - - - - - 5 , / ; s •t ''� - -- I AsPr+Alf _ = y /'' f .f f ; = y % i% STA: 60+61± (�
1 -PROP. 24 RJ 11.25' BED END 24" DIAMETER F
N: 905288.1 \ _ -_- - - - -___ ,,2 %% �' /'l_ %% l = % RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
- '
E: 1219352.31\ ... STA• 49 +14f ,+ /Y _ STA: 1 +461 \ _;6.s- `'�,,, STA: 60 +61f Uj
SSMANHOL£ END 24" DIAMETER END METER Jam/ BEGIN N24" DIAMETER HDPE WATER LINE
BEFORE YOU DIG TOP RIM = 3096.96' / i ��'=. -` =i %.''i.�•!�'' �.i' i�•' ' /, J
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE RESTRAINED INT..DI WATER LINE y, v / ,,,_;; �; ;, 000g HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL
STA: 48 +131 SS MANHOLE / - _ ' '
�0� " STA: 48 +08 1 -PROP. 24 RJ 45' BEND '; ;% _ s= ',%' _ ;- = '�.' ± .� /
TOP RIM = 3095:84' / '/ %" GRAPHIC SCALE G(
- / . / „_ r= oo SEE DETAIL 4 C4.23
CAM reoo 6&2-4W 1 -PROP. 24 RJ 22.5' BEND ` ''i ' '' / 50' 25' o' 25' 50' Z
N• 905293.38 / _ _ ,
' '"CEKI� N: 905290.04 HONEYCU7r /HUTCHENS, '` / / 's,'4� _Y- ,/''/, - ;''- --' /' RIVER CROSSING #3 100'
IT's ?IrR LAYI/ E: 1219357.68 E: 1219361.41 AUREL MOUNTAIN ESTATES fAIAILY sis - . , / /;i. _ l - (,jam
LIMITED / / i� ' ' /. % ^�I \f /, ..� /
\ D8: 408 PG: 148 % SEE DETAIL 4/C4.23 AND C4.22
\ \
PIN., 2910 -94 -0824 -000 �/ I' /,i'/ �ij i.. Vii% ''•�- ____ - -_ iii /ii' i / \ " - 50'
...tom'/ .' /.a. %�.•- `_-_-_____ - - -" -' '/'''
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
- , 401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE �, • ..;C1; CqR .s9as�
DRAWN BY PROJECTO'DATE W HICKORY, 8, 3 - 6 11 APPROVALS - - -- ei° �es$ /, 0.. oils ° ®p
e�'� ,....... Ol
828 327 -6911
JKI MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE NO. F -0374 �° ;9
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING - - -- _ d
BLT 80376.00.HI DICIKSON Office Locations: s
Fl NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION - - --
LE 3 _
80376 -BOONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO pROUND.OWG South Carolina + a
RECORD DWG. - - -- a N P r°
9ht W.
.630♦b8891g
C4.
4.42
4 -
'REVISED CROSSING IMPACT LABEL PER NCOENR COMMENTS
2/17/15
3
REVISED COORDINATE PRECISION
2/12/15
2
'UPDATED PARCEL DATA
3/18/14
1
REVISED EASEMENT ON WATAUGA COUNTY PARCEL \.
2/5/14
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
- , 401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE �, • ..;C1; CqR .s9as�
DRAWN BY PROJECTO'DATE W HICKORY, 8, 3 - 6 11 APPROVALS - - -- ei° �es$ /, 0.. oils ° ®p
e�'� ,....... Ol
828 327 -6911
JKI MARCH 2015 NC LICENSE NO. F -0374 �° ;9
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING - - -- _ d
BLT 80376.00.HI DICIKSON Office Locations: s
Fl NAME community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION - - --
LE 3 _
80376 -BOONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO pROUND.OWG South Carolina + a
RECORD DWG. - - -- a N P r°
9ht W.
.630♦b8891g
C4.
4.42

�0 w
LL3 NDITV TION
00 / 1 \ • //, \ \\ old $NINNC,V S. ;02 iCN
��ZR `• \ .\ \ `�\,��� \ \\ PI,Y: 02910?Gl 2% ?9 GOC
\h x ., �� I \ • .5757
IS! I�`Q�\
fill
If I
Pl \
I' •- .._-- -... /• rr•T "III i \ .� \�\` i
o 79+
xz ' ur \i,r�': - <1 - PROP. 2 RJ 22.5' BEND;
���a �. _ 1 �,' ► _+(y\�``= =N: 907454.41 \
122012.32__ _
TEMP. GRAVEL CONSTRU
V• Nw
ENTRANCE /EXIT, TYP.
R oo ';Z- S€E- DETAIL 1/G0.5
Maw
Q�.ai ,� 1./ ; PROP. 40' UTILITY • • �'\
F, 0 a' / {�; _ - EASEMENT
toz rM- 7`" - - - -- ' - -\ - =- �'�5'_"".''" -, / ! i FM _•T"'�-`fM��` - "��� .-.--
cJa I� \ '� ASPHALT
00 00
z
- - "' �..��. .�_?•T$" ;ti / %// CIX/N7Y OF 4Yg TAUGA '-
• �..` � ^•• / £XiSRNC 15' WATER AND SEVER EASEMENT
Z' = D.8 153, PG 756
�--" .10E /LLIIAMS, E.
EVSDNG 60' RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEM
'YFN y7 FOR ROAD
D.B. 118, PG,
1
1 CROSS UNDER 6" WATER LINE
(/ MAINTAIN 12" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANC
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
TDY+P, OF BOONS 4
10
08 PG. 382 / 4
PB. JO PG. J33
PARCEL 9 2910966716000 1 SOUTHERN AGRICULTURAL INSE
08: 137 PG 160
STA: 79 +201 PIN: 2920 -07 -3190 -000
1 - PROP. 24" RJ 22.5' BEND
' N: 907442.57
E: 1220139.90
�CC\A
It PROP. H ONTAL DIRECTIONAL
EXISTING 25' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
NORTHWESTERN HOUSING ENT£RPRIZES
O.B. 423 PG 161
P is
�It 1 II 4\ 18" C.MP /
3090.72' . -NC007 50' R /P/ /
D.B. 968. PG 34
•` z
\} x11 18` CUP ,
INV = J078.40'
\ � t
rC4 \ /
i lid � a 1
CROSS UNDER 18" CMP %M\
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL ARANCE \\ re' cup
SEE DETAI6 /C4.23 ` INV. - J07s40'
EXIST. 8" Pvc /
A \ \\ \\ FORCE MAIN /
o
-< 18" CMP •. \ �6 \
INV .• 307891'
\ CROSS UNDE 18" CMP
\, 'MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL C ARANCE
SEE, DETAIU 6/C4.23
NC007 50' R/PJ
'\ 1y D.B. 988, PG. 37
/ PROP. 2 "DIP RAW WATER LINE � `� 8'A
! OPEN CUT ASPHA T; SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24
3 FT. MIN. COVER. /
1 MAINTAIN 10 IN. HORZ. SEPARATION
1 \ FROM EXISTIN 8" PVC FORCE MAIN
1
s
,.� /• \ \\ DD: 1092 9 644 v
aiN: 29io-1 - 1e-91so -oco
sum "M No \ \
STRADFORD GUAPRIE� F BOONE, ING OB: 450 PC In DEFLECT PIPE AS REQUIRED 61112-411W Pm: 2920- J7- 8565 -000 ..�
�o1ecu�LceleeT , � � UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
rrs M LAW 1 `•
7 REVISED COORDINATE PRECISION 2/12/15
8 5 t4
AA,RY 1 JACKSON JR,
BR i26 PG 556
PIN: 2920 -07 -5898 -000
J I A: b4 +bbd „•: -�
y� PIN. 2920 07 -63s 000
_ DIRECTIONAL D ILL ` 1 ` 1 -PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND 15 °"a c 56£M£vr a53 P
SEWER LINE & SPAIN FIELD N 90757188 (LOCATION UNKNOWN)
SEE DETAIL 4/C .23 BOR 350, PC 581 : .
(LOCATION UNKNOWN) E: 1220687.93
/ / t
/
.`_ WAY LIMNS
/ TERRY B BROWN '
BR: '..: PC 163 HDD RECEIVING PIT WILL ENCROACH �NTO PAVEMENT
2920 -0PC, 78 -030
OF NEW RIVER HILLS. RECEIVING IjiT SHALL BE
p \� COVERED WITH NCDOT APPROVED rMIETAL
PLATES AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.
SEE DETAIL 8/C4.23
STA: 89 +401
END 24" DIAMETER
DORINOA MM47TT
08. 1592 PC 328
Pik: 2920 -I8- 2117 -OW
CROSS UNDER 18" CMP
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
i
I
LAIN I
NCE
1.23 NOTES:
1-ECT PIPE AS REQUIRED
_ESS NOTED OTHERWISE �
CROSS UNDER 18" CMP
MAINTAIN '18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
PROP. TEMP. FIBER CHECK
LLI L!J
Z w
_ _U
I
4 I-
(LL
U)
INSTALL 24" DIP WATER LINE IN
1 i � 20 LF OF 36" STEEL CASING (t= 0.375 ") 1. PROVIDE "
PRIVATE Rlcxr of wqY FOR SEWER -/ 1 L P DE 18 VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED .WATER
80R 350, PG 769 1 WITH WATER TIGHT SEALED ENDS LINE AND STORM PIPES.
(45701H UNKNOWN) I I �•..`...
2. CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO PROPER PRE - CONSTRUCTION
CONDITION ALL UTILITIES (STORM DRAINAGE, ETC.) AFFECTED BY
CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED WATER LINE.
_ DE ME L R08INSOn,
"��... D8' 1231P . 386
..��' PIN: 2920 -16- 5.`x54 -000
.gs;"PN CROSY.£LL, and vile �. �- ...---- ' °' -'-'•
MARINA CPC. J47
O8 0-1 -6 34>
PIN: T9T0- t8 -818> -000
/ PROP. TEMP. FIBER CHECK
NCDOT 50' R/Yr DAM, TYPICAL
D.B. 966, PG 40 SEE DETAIL 5/00.5
� I
i
PROP. INLET i
PROTECTION, TYP.
SEE DETAIL. 4/G4.1
10' INSIDE EAST EOP �t
10' MIN SEPARATION FROM
EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN
"
CROSS UNDER 15 CMP
MAINTAIN 18 MIN. R11CAL CLEARANCE
ii
15` RCP I
INV. - 3079.04; i
15' RCP'
INV - 3079.14'
SEE DETAIL 6/04.2
�
18 G• MP -'� / '' G " / • • �Q�1
/NV. - 301g1,42'
/p
If
r "/
IT
"l
24* CUP � -INV '= os.2s' � �p3k0�, \bv _ �o,s3' /CROSS UNDER 18" CMP �
' Y UM
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAIl�ItARANCE
c ° 1NV,'a 80..1s \6 W
< SEE DETAIL 6/04.23
!2
"CMP
6 101 -,Iuu
11ORlV£ 1a cup CROSS UND 18" MP
MAINT 18 MIN. RTICAL CLEARANCE
S�E'6ETAIL 6/C4.23\
15• CMP 24 CMP
CROSS UNDER 24" CMP
•
INV. - 3079,07' u. - 307a61 MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL Ci_ A CE �' • • i i �/
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
6 REVSED PER NCDOT / / PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR
5
UPDATED PARCEL DATA ,. \,
3/18/14
4
REVISED EASEMENT LINES -
2/17/14
:3 ,
MINIMUM STORM DRAINAGE SEPARATION REVISED PER NCDOT
10/16/12
2
STEEL PLATE NOTE ADDED PER NODENR
10/16/12
-1
EROSION CONTROL REVISIONS PER NCDENR
8/14/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS'
DATE
AS
� S
64pea6l6ar8 &b ®D''�
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
JEFFREY S PATTON
06: 495 PG 566 _
PIN: 2920 -18- 3999 -000 + �:
-Z s
NC•OOT 50' R /V/ 8•�'I'/ gam/ y\/ j /
AB. 988, PG. 4,3
18' RCP
INV, - 307860'
/
/
-3080-
i o s
,
0
RCP
307a I
X
Z
CROSS UNDER 18" RCP
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
PROP. TEMP. SILT
FENCE, TYPICAL.
SEE DETAIL 2/G0.6
PROP 24",&P RAW WATER LINE
OPEN CUf ASPHALT, SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24
3 FT. MIN. COVER.
MAINTAIN 10' MIN. HORZ. SEPARATION
FROM EXISTING 8" PVC FORCE MAIN
U
0
0
Q
W
RADFORO PROPERPES. INC.
08. 1076 P2, 376 Elf
Ft9: 2920 -29- 1234 -00
0
I
W
D
GRAPHIC SCALE Q
50' 25' 0' 25' 50' 100' z
24" RAW WATER LINE
STA. 77 +75 TO STA. 110 +25
1 " =50'
n
...0 C4.4
4.4
RWH 1 " =50'
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911 ��K
APPROVALS
JKI MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
WDICKS0N
BIDDING
BLT 80376.00.H1
FILE NAME
Office Locations:
community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
CONSTRUCTION
RECORD DWG.
80376 -BOONE RAW WL- CGNVERTEO TO
ROVND.DWG South Carolina
DATE
AS
� S
64pea6l6ar8 &b ®D''�
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
JEFFREY S PATTON
06: 495 PG 566 _
PIN: 2920 -18- 3999 -000 + �:
-Z s
NC•OOT 50' R /V/ 8•�'I'/ gam/ y\/ j /
AB. 988, PG. 4,3
18' RCP
INV, - 307860'
/
/
-3080-
i o s
,
0
RCP
307a I
X
Z
CROSS UNDER 18" RCP
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
PROP. TEMP. SILT
FENCE, TYPICAL.
SEE DETAIL 2/G0.6
PROP 24",&P RAW WATER LINE
OPEN CUf ASPHALT, SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24
3 FT. MIN. COVER.
MAINTAIN 10' MIN. HORZ. SEPARATION
FROM EXISTING 8" PVC FORCE MAIN
U
0
0
Q
W
RADFORO PROPERPES. INC.
08. 1076 P2, 376 Elf
Ft9: 2920 -29- 1234 -00
0
I
W
D
GRAPHIC SCALE Q
50' 25' 0' 25' 50' 100' z
24" RAW WATER LINE
STA. 77 +75 TO STA. 110 +25
1 " =50'
n
...0 C4.4
4.4

Fy-V-
ULLO
a -3
X85
ffi €�
U
o�O
P1
oaf
�z
ow
WD
'o
zoao
QgUO
0
0
�n
U �
30
.?1Fk -'U
6W ?m
:4,
OUNV,
U
x6z
3F3
0
,-z w
�jtUl,Q
ac,Y
U 00�
/
/
C
- __- __ - -''�
! ( /! /// /, // �/w t/ /l l/J /l�jl /l�111/1 /l /l /l
! ll,�,lltlJJJ�J -
r /j /, /' 1't,% ' I �' f/ ! ! /.: t / / /j /I /J /JIJJ/ / / 'v J -
///� 31 I / _
//,/!/////�//, / �soao� /// , / / 1 /, %j / /! //% Jf�JJJ
j It p
\ lIll 11 1 , ! / / ! /• /iv : i `\ J .. � 1 j f // / \ '� / I/i i JJ ! /ff f f j ! / , / ,!,' / ,-' � -� "` � - :-'/ �,,,., _, - -
SS MANHOLE
.6 \ p \ \ TOP RIM = 3096.93'
S \ -
SS MANHOLE'
70P RIM x3095.57^
�j
IS
RIVER CROSSING #5
\ SEE DETAIL 4/C4.23 AND C4.22
f !/
/' --
STA: 117 +431 / I
END 24 DIAMETER HDPE WATER LINE
BY HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL
SEE DETAIL 4/C4.23
i :1 (, / 111 // � / ! /
� I �--• ! ,/ j / /j� /, j ! ! , , / / , ,-' / r /
o� 111 rl i �! ! ! - - \, / ' / i//
STA: 117+421 -
� �� BEGIN 24 DIAMETER
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE / / 07 1c�
PROP. HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL / / : /j ✓ / / / / / /, / / ! / / / /
/T
DRILL EXIT POINT /!!/
1: ! 1 / / / / / ✓ /
.,� , ✓ , . • /! / / \ I \ 23 OFF Boc
/SS MANHOLE
TOP RIM - 3107.99'
INV. /N = 3102.86•
lNV. OUT =3)0276'
I ! %/ !
It
STA: 117 +80f /
` 1 - PROP. AIR RELEASE VALVE �w%
TYPE 2. SEE DETAIL 1/C4.25
�� !� / rr,w /!!o °tt�,!lP�4Ill, ! ,! il,,� !,
\ \ , STA: 117 +981 , / p /ti / / / / ! i J ! / / / ! I / !� ! ,
RCP' R / • \ + / 1 -PROP. 24" RJ GATE VALVE : �r , / / A /, / / , t /1 1 ! / ! / , 1 / 1 I l 1 ! �/ (! / / 1 / ! , / 0° ,
T:@\ �~ /' !// / u. r= rs' "' \ \ / / , / / // / / / ! / 1 1 / I / / I / 1 / / I I l / l p I / ,
. �@ s ! r J/ ,�y � -: \% ) \ SEE DETAIL 1 /C4.27 90' / / / , / / / , / I ! ! , ! I J 1 / l / /
Ill J 1 'I l 1 1(l / I l !
/!/ !// , (1 1 ( 11/ / ! //
Q -x--x l I / // / / , ! (1 I I J l ) J / I ! ( / /
z-x // ` \I // / / / /,/ /, / //, i// 11 if ! ( I I J
// fit" N, - lllil 51 �*h. ✓ Gs x �\ - ! / \ / /t j / / 1 1 ' t I / I
\ _y \ , ✓/// !/ / / / ! \ \ It 1/ , 1 / 1 1 1 1 I /
CA BASH _ / ! / / // 1 I \ ( l I
� 1 `� ✓� /! � r TOP GRATE = 3104.17' `'��.., ! / / / I � I I I /
30" RCP ruv. w = 3097.?9' , ! / l \\ --• 1 1 ( 1
, �- / - - // / // ! 1 ! 1/ I 11 )
` / ^ / I' / ✓'- �....- / / , G .CY' Qi, t RCP / V. OUT = 3097,19• \ ••. r:i // / / \ \ \ I l 1 / / l ( / / !
0$.�` 30'r �_ l !/ / �/ / / \�\ 11 II+ ! j! /
s. //, //so l s� �` / IIII ! ! ! // // �/ / l /! !
/ 3s' CMP \ a / / / 3 �/ / � �� • \ \ \` � � �!� / , / STA: 121 +031 , I l l /! 1 / JI ! / 1 / / !/
lV =s 3p 4. I i \�Yiq / / ' /' �/.6. ``n / /f1 /� / / \\�� `\` � •..,� // �--
�/ ! //j R' /%1 )) \ 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 90' BEND i !
X12' CUP oLXEr . ) zs^ , - 1 / } f 11 ! l III�I I / 1 ! ! / 1 /! l/ ! l/ 1 1 /l I/ I J t /l /l /1 / /// I
\ SS MANHOLE / N: 909850.50 II / l 11 l i 11 ! 11 1
to, / 11/
i l C -' L / j "x \� yY 1 r , t // o, / . //// � MANHOLE � / / �• .��.� � �� � -- 1 E: 1221715.46
/V. / /III i / 1 I l / / I i I J' / / , 1` /l / !!
\ °r� i ( 1 , �. 36 CMP / /� /1 / \;. F'TOP R/M / �'3�. -� •� '�
-,INV. OUT = 3115.72' / // � \ 1 ' I 1 V" \'' � 1 ! 1
\ � \ '� 11 I > l 1 / �•! = 3o/isB• /% � ros �' / / ao.} -.• � � ,� �
PROP. 10x20
Zy� I 1 t / / I / / 1
BORE PIT STA: 122 +041 1 1 I I 1 I I I !! I( I 1 J i ! l j 1 1
DIAMETER
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
/l "f / / !/ /SJJrJ!! I I \ \�A \ ./ \ :! _-
_1 / �/ 3x)11(/ ! l \ 7 / \
f 1 1 // (1/ J 7 / i\ TOP MRIM H= 3142.42• \ } 1 l I
PROP. 10x30 .� \ ._ 1 \ � } I } }
18- CMP/ ✓ 1 (NY• 1= 0.57. 1/l!I/ 1 % / i �J • %/ 1 1 \8X� / BORE PIT ! \ �- - 'i�l`.� .,� ` ./•. JY1$Q"�•" \ \ \\ INV. 1N - 3134.12'
= 3o76.4r' N. JI / Il l l / % /�i� / / /t 111 \ \ is �O / / / a �\ , \
!1 \ INV. = 0 \ .. -> / / / O� �l ASPHALT DRIVE �\ \ \\ \1N\ OUT =\3134.02'\
_- 'i P /m /!� /�!l' l� v v \ �� �� , / / v x< s. ( 0,61 V A A I 1 1 1 V A A \
CATCH a S!N VA�A V A \ \ V A A V A 1 } T�E� AM\ V A
STR TE 0.° NORTH CAROL1fiA / �. O %i ly- -�--•- V \V A
TOP GRAIE =3r22sz' v cep p� AVA�VAVA A VA V \\ VA
24" RCP /NI! !N = 3176.44' !
i O , \ ,6,. �b ?mow 8' OFF BOC 1 1 \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \` \ \ 1 \
s�f � I �• O 30" RCP ruu. our = 3716.42 �\ \ l \ \ ,PROP. TEMP. SILT \ J1
a1P I 1�J11 // 36.1372\ \roPGRATE'3iai86 !F i1 /C �Gp ' , g / /// Q, 12?'' '` /w ' �� / 11\ \.l\ \�\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ FENCE, TYPICAL
.93' I NCOOr O I SS MANHOLE \ \ �, ` `.... /
! l" x . . \
O.S. 60,, 823 ` ! i TOP HIM - 310339' _
\ \ \ 1 P / -- 6 Yr sr r -PROP. SLOPE INTERRUPTION \ \\ \ SEE DETAIL 2 G0.6
+ \� 6" PVC !NV OUT
3100.89' / \ \ I -�.�� : C. .� / / \ , \ \
\g \ /�/ \ \ \ x00 // / , / / �� /e TYPICAL SEE DETAIL 3/G4.1 \ \ \\ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ TOP OL3lssse'
6T I } a, 1"' / ! ! CATCH BASIN,^ "�
11 12 aTOPCRAT =3099.6Y \ \ \ \ 51A� \ \ \ \ \ ( y> / / / - 12 \� ./ // } . \\ \ , .\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\
I . , !/ : ` p 1 y..� U / ? , 3x /' / \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \iN /N�ti '150001 o \
12' CMP /NV. OUT = 3099.51' e CJR \ .- // T„•. -,.. - / . IS> / -
CROSS UNDER 16" WATER LINE \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \
MAINTAIN 12 MIN. VERTI AL CLEARANCE �6OC !/// / \ // 7 / Q// �\ ,may 'r_ I \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ Z
111 II ! SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
to I / I r ! / \ �� - / / J2g -,'� / 1 \\ \ \\ \ \ \� \ 0
: ee Moane ae co. / ���. -'� �' � •� _ - � / \ � -E '' - -`.��. 1 I � I \ \ e,� \ \ \ e,.\ \ \'
¢¢. S,y (� / ! ➢LV.�2970r 9C44Si8GC0 1 \� - .,,� / / r / �_' 00- - _ a,\ \ ''.a\
•�1/ 1>}" CUP / / \ ��•.. CATCH BASIN Q\ \ Q\
l = 3073.7B' FLOODWAY LIMITS �.,� �, -� \ .� \. -� TOP ORATE = 3146.45' +.� C,... \\ \ \ \\ l \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \
'� I Y�500 YEAR t2 ?4" RCA /NV. IN = 374D.25' a " %2s o ' \ I } \ \ \
^",.,.
- -- STA: 120 +21 t / / -�` - 1 ` � ` / 14• RCP 1N1! OUT = 314,0125- I I a � x00 •„` - I \ , 1 \` } \
1 - PROP. 24 RJ 90' BEND / / -
PROP. 130' LF OF N: 909777.87 ' �� _� ` 1 ` 1 1 / 1 I 1 t \ } f)
36" STEEL CASING (t= 0.375 ") E: 1221753.54 ` �`�` �'--` -.� -� �'3i '-•-� J / II �' `�'6" "� \ 1 R�vf: z
W/ RJ D.I.P. CARRIER PIPE / Sa_�� _ I I J / '� 126 SO) O
, I 31 I o/ '� BY BORE AND JACK CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE / / 1 `� = _ I t T X �\ \ U
"�•..�. �. +. •�. CA7M BASIN
:D y�� \ �o°': / / % SEE DETAIL 3/C4.24 SHORING AT RECEIVING END OF BORE
.E '� / TOP GRATE - 3148.28'
' / CROSS UNDER 18" CMP TO MEET NCDOT REQUIREMENTS, SEE / �� 24" RCP tNU. !N = 3x4216 I ! N� L� j'
( > $1 " DETAIL 1 C4.28 AND gay \ z� RCP Lt+u. our= X52\ ?�q I
7 I J MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE /
I 0 / / ® SPECIFICATION 31 40 00. . _ _ ,.. LL` -•- �1 ` ` ` - \ R"' } / r /•`U �� . LL.
N o, SEE DETAIL F C4.13�
CROSS UNDER 12" PVC SEWER LINE = \ `! `e)
° PROP. 75' LF OF MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE �a N
CROSS UNDER 8" PVC SEWER FORCE MAIN 36" STEEL CASING (t= 0.375 ") SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 ` " GRATE B 315 \ I 1 \
Uj
3 �! MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE W/ RJ D.I.P. CARRIER PIPE INSTALL 24" DIP WATER LINE IN �.` TOP GRATE = 3x55.49' \ Q
•� 75" RCP /NV. IN = 314896' \
24 RCP VV OUT,- 314894"`
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 BY BORE AND JACK 20 OF 36 » STEEL CASING (t= 0.375" ) y
I J / INSTALL 24" DIP WATER LINE IN (6' MIN. COVER) TH WATER TIGHT SEALED ENDS !UI ! J
40 LF OF 36" STEEL CASING (t= 0.375 ") SEE DETAIL 3/C4.24 W
WITH WATER TIGHT SEALED ENDS GENERAL NOTES: ROSS UNDER 16 WATER LINE r R/W
" MAINTAIN 1 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE.
1. PROVIDE 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN CROSS UNDER 24" RCP SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
PROPOSED WATER LINE AND STORM PIPES. VERTICAL CLEARANCE CONTRACTOR T AFIELD VERIFY BEFORE
l'r TV o
2. CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO PROPER SEE DETAIL F/C4.13 EXCA TION IN THIS AREA.
C�
4 PRE - CONSTRUCTION CONDITION ALL UTILITIES (STORM
DRAINAGE, ETC.) AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION AND . \ z
CROSS OVER 6" GAS LINE
INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED WATER LINE. \ \ \� _ (a
MAINTAIN 2" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: CONTR CTOR TO FIELD VERIFY DEPTH \ /J l�tl - \ U)
OF GAS LINE BEFO E EXCAVATION IN THIS AREA. w
1. SEE PLAN SHEET C4.33B FOR GENERAL NOTES FOR 11 '
TRAFFIC CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS.
2. USE DETAIL 3/C4.33A FOR WORK AT US HWY 421 i DOUBLE WRAP PIPE WITH �� !"� GRAPHIC SCALE Q
AND SR 1514 INTERSECTION. 8 MIL. POLYETHYLENE WRAP '�\ �\ i 1 50' 25' 0' 25' 50' 100' z
10 EACH DIRECTION FROM
LL-
3. USE DETAIL 1/C4.33A FOR WORK ALONG US HWY 421 1 GAS LINE INTERSECTION.
BETWEEN APPROXIMATE STATIONS 121 +00 AND `\ 1 1 " = 50'
126 +50. 1
6
REVISED - PERNCDOT
11/13/14
5
CASING COVER PER NCDOT
7/24/14
4
UPDATED PARCEL DATA
3/18/14
3
iREVISED EASEMENT TYPE
2/5/14
2
MINIMUM STORM DRAINAGE SEPARATION REVISED PER NCDOT
10/16/12
1
EROSION CONTROL REVISIONS PER NCDENR . `
8/14/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1 " =50'
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
JKI MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376 60ONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
V \/ K (828) 327 -6911
r NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
r D�CKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
ROUND.DWG South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
BIDDING
- - --
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
- - --
a,?'GIN�tie*e
tv,8pPS426�q$
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
24" RAW WATER LINE
STA. 110 +25 TO STA. 126 +50
C4.5
4.42

\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 7 _
ALL° `y
ZW< \ \ \ \ \ o \\ \ \ c,\ \ \
y\ \\ �.
ZJizi� .�..- J \ } \ \ \
c� \-\
w�W - \'`\ \ /�
�\
- ) \ ) l \ \ \ \ \ \l \ \ \ \� \ \ \ \\ 1 \ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \�-- \-_ -_ - -- ° °`�__ - -_/ \ \ / / i STA: 435 +46i{ 1
-- -- - -_:./ %, ,.,,1/ \ --- 3175 -_'_ ////1 -PROP. 24" RJ 22.5' BEND
,// N: 916945.27 a
zoo °m -- -- "--- J%.!-- ..�-/'�" �J.- -i.- -= \ \ \ o \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \I \ \ \ \ \ \ \'� \ / \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \•_�`^� - _ \\ \� \ \\ / /'� i/ /
``\ \� Iii \\ \ \\ \\ / - - 3170'-
1 '- �\ -, / // / / E: 1251147. 5
Mzo - - '�."._.•.. +"��� /� //� - i •--- -- �,t \ I \I I I I \ \ \ \ \�� \ \ \ \ \ \,j ? \ \ \ \a \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \� \`t -__. �`'` -- - \ \ \\ \ \ \�.- /// // / // / / I J I / / l l 1 I
w- JN -_ - .. --�•r - - `'.� -.� i �- �- ' '_.� -. '�,.._ - _ - = -_ ,'C / I
Roza -- - �- �// iii ` -- - -- .,,,. / /l' } \ \ \ �. \\ \ \ \\ \ \ �\ _r-� -- 6J //
// \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\\\ \ \ \� \ \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ /' 1 ' % 1 Z/ 1 ! I \
1
_ CROSS UNDER 15 RCP I 1 1 1 (
w= _ - _ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ° �� _ _ \ < I / l 1 STA: 435 +221
W< -- - __ \ \\ \=�i^T 1NK ��2.7,8'I °� ' _ _ - MAINTAIN 18 MIN. 1 -PROP. 24 RJ 22.5' BEND
_ - - // / - VERTICAL CLEARANCE
/ / \ 1 \\ ��/ / ! e // - - N: 916925.19
- / ' - - `= // j _ ~° \ -7-7--_ - - - - SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
z wm.! e ._.-'- - / "� -�-" �"� // /' / / /' /'J/ r' / / / \ \ iii, =...� /. j5
o ° - /' �._ 12 1133.29
JOOt- - --.-- _�•!.�i"` i ..- ./. � / "' � /Y "I -.- _.-. - --' / ../i /// // // i•/ �- .i / /' .i � �.. \ \ \ �•".. --• ,.._. ^�c��--�^ -^�� \ / J
\.
d zw L �.- r -.- /..,,, / ..-) / / / / i- "- .i / \ / l -v/ R
K 00
fY7REf �A
CROSS OVER 15 CMP/ "'RCP
_ , � ..-- / s !, �- / .-y. _" � .... -' ....- ^.-' `- `y_. ---• _ ,� � � / �•/ / / / / _ / ' � „ .�' / / / / /' ,.- \ __ Cb INV. 26'
\ \_�� - MAINTAIN 18" MIN /
- -
ap - _ �' CROSS OVER 15" RCP' p�+�Dk f _ - ' - i /` / -' / / '' '� / /' / ' / /' / ' CATCH BASIN �\ \ III 1� `ll�txv. = 3n622o'�_�H -_ _�� -- = VERTICAL CLEARANCE - -'� -i '���, -TB RCP I `%
�.J
o &� - MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE�i -' _- - -_' ___ / / / / ` / / \ I I 1 17 "c.. �.._ . - - - - - E 6/C
_ _. - _..- / / �, / / / �. / / 70P GRAZE = 3177.96 11 `I \ '- --. - :. �- / SE DETAIL 4 23
/ .-- - ,i ' ". . ' / .� / / / � / ' / / n 36' CMP INV. our = 3172.78' 1 \ \ VII P\ I �1 " "r
N SEE `DETAIL 6 C4 23� - -_ _ - - - --' / / / \ _
- - - - _ / - - - - _ / / CROSS UNDER 36 RCP / '�\��" -�-3s' cMP - - - - _ PROP. 80 LF OF
x a r -'i i _ ' - _ - - - - - ' / » ' / C \ \ \ \� wu. �`rso.74' - - _ _ _ 36 9 STEEL CASING (t= 0.375)
3?w» �y - - c3 t5'RG - - / /�__ / MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE / / 0 \ \ - _ 7 OFF EOP -
IN V. _ J,221.54 --7i ` 15 %CMP - '- 15' RCP ` \ , 7' OFF EOP - SEE DETAIL 6 C4.23 /' ' -� \ 1\ . • \ \ . _ _ _. _ _ _ - _ -
_ - - -._.._ -.
o ( l \ \ 2y \ < < / / \ STA: 429 +00± -- _ - - - - _ W/ RJ D.I.P. D.LP CARRIER PIPE
w I \ \ \ \ \ `\ 3 ?0 \ \ \ \ \\ \ �� -- -- \ _ - BY BORE AND JACK = - - \ -!N_T' 3t =-
o� END CLASS 200 DI WATER PIPE
Z C�3 \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ BEGIN CLASS 250 DI WATER PIPE - 3/C4.24
- - - - SEE DETAIL =- - ti r
° °_° \ \ \ \ \ \ (I \ _ = CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE _ a-
�z
\ SHORING AT RECEIVING END OF BORE
W 420 +00 421 +00 I l- i ( - \ 1- 1 - i -\ -7u. \ _ \ _ \ I \ \ �` TO MEET NCDOT REQUIREMENTS, SEE
_ W / 422 +00 423 +00 424 +00 I 1+00 } S. HY 4211 \ I - - - \ - L
U 36" RCPT ! - - -! / \° OP MAX- 375820 -
_ / / 425 +00426 / / 427 +00 \ I I \ - DETAIL 1/C4.28 AND 1
Q \ �\' \ a- - - /- z - =1 ' _ - ��6' RCPT - - - / 428 +00 429 +00 , / INV. a = 315315'
\ I \ \ \ \ ` \ \ ` - ;` - ° G _ 3s R 430 +00 431 +00 PROP. 10x20 \
° \ \ _ \ SPECIFICATION 31 40 00.
� W \ \ \ \ C- - -- - -_ _- - _ - -_
\ -^ -.. �- .� \ `� � ,. � -. \ \ \ - - ( 434 +00 --
\ \ \ � - �- ---\ l.- r- ±00 -' - 433 +00 BORE PIT
W
I CATCH BASIN / \ ,\
TOP GRATE 321255 / / / /- I '- --- 1 / I A BASIN �1 / ( <
36' RCP (W) INV. - 3211.85 / 1 I I j / / -- / l / 1, TOP GRATE = 3179.58
36' RCP (E) INK = 3271.17 / CATCH BASIN �y%/ - 1 - 15" RCP (S) INV. - 3175.11 / - - _ -
�" / TOP GRATE - 3198.12 I
15' RCP (S) INV! - 321225 / %/ / 36` RCP (W) INK - 3179.78
/ / 36' RCP (W) INV. - 3192.37 / / I \ / \
15' RCP (N} MK = 3211.11 / i \ / 48' RCP (N) INV. 3175.08
,/ II / 36' RCP E 1N✓. = 3191.72
'✓. � l I / ..� STA: 433 +371 / -
�_ rs lNU.3szr44 _ " 3220, ' ' - _ _ 3190 _ _ - - -- _ - - _'- _ BEGIN 24 DIAMETER
_ PROP. TEMP. FIBER CHEC / / _ _ - - - _ - - _ RESTRAINED JOINT I WATER LINE - - - - - -
°�. .+: _ - _ DAM, TYPICAL �i '' i i� -' -__ -G��. _--_ - _ �_ 3170 _ _ - -_� - _316_- - -- \_ --
_ ,_¢_ _ _
SEE DETAIL 5/G0.5 i r / j'° _=3�aa - - _?=- - - - 3i7o ` / _ - TEMP. GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ - t STA 434 +361 = - _ - _ - -
_ - oo�j - - - - _ ENTRANCE/EXIT, TYP. - -_ 3150 -1 -PROP. 24" RJ 22.5' BEN
` - - Z:- - _ - - - _ \ 32 / / r / / / / / - -- - _ - CA 9Ak- _ - > / 3160 SEE DETAIL 1 G0.5 = -
='- I I V I I I / _ - - TOP GRA7E = 3184.23- \ C PROP. INLET / /� I / / - - _ _ _- __ - N: 916841.73 _ - - - = - - - - -
c. �, \ _ =/ =- -15" RCP INV. = 3na7o -� PROTECTION, YP. -- - - 3140 _
, } / /
_ =a' i \ \\ } 1 I I I I ( I I I // / �/ - l ` \\\ '3rs tiy0/ - -- - -- _=5 E: 1251115.00 __ _ _ -- - __
\ / - _ o\ SEE DETAIL 4/G4.1 / 3 / STA: 434 +281 _ - - - -
- ? / / / (/ / / 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND - _ - - _ - _MINIMUM 5' COVER AT - -- - -
-°= / N: 916834.99 i C�U�ARD RAIL�CROSSIN�T _ - °� - -
`> E: 1251110.30 - _ �- - - ` CROSS 0 "
VER 18 RCP -�
MAINTAIN-18 MIN. ;1ERTICAL CLEARANCE
_ / / / PROP. BOOSTER PUMP
GENERAL NOTES \
TRIBUTARY 7, IMPACT S5 STATION SITE
STA: 450 +001
1. PROVIDE 18 VERTICAL' CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER - = CROSS OVER 6 GAS LINE 1 - ` ` �o \ \ \ \ \ SEE DETAILS 1 /G4.1 AND 2- 5/G0.7. DIVISION 3 END CLASS 200 DI WATER PIPE
LINE AND STORM PIPES. " ✓ / % > \� °F \ \ \ \ \
- = MAINTAIN 12 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE -� \ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ DUE TO TROUT MORATORIUMS ANY - - -
° \ � -� _.. - _ � -BEGIN CLASS 250 DI WATER PIPE.
FIELD VERIFY DEPTH o� " ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
3rs 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THIS _ - r _ _ _ _
2. CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO. PROPER PRE - - - - \ °�\ f / \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - --/- - - ' -
\ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ STREAM IS PROHIBITED DURING THE _ TOWN OF BOONS -
CONDITION ALL UTILITIES (STORM DRAINAGE, ETC.) AFFECTED BY _ - - STA: 437 +631 ° ° \ \ LQS `oWA75 FAMILY J \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PERIOD BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 15. DB: 1458 PC, 519 -
CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED WATER LINE. - - \ - - - - PROP. BELOW GRADE WATER \ \ \� \� \ \ \
TRACT 5 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ PB: 22 PO* -
\ - MAIN BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �C� \ 104j, ° 1 - 3230
TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: \ - - SEE DETAIL 2/C4.26 \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ - C\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ /'^ \\ ?oo - - - - - - - - - ` ` 1
\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ v \ \� \ \\ \ \\ \\ 3y 10 \ \\ \ `\ MFyeFSOF/ - - - -- PROPOSED ANTI
\ \ SEEPAGE COLLAR,.. IYP.:,, .
1. SEE PLAN SHEET C4.336 FOR GENERAL NOTES FOR TRAFFIC / STA: 437 +731 \ \ \ q-,
SEE DETAIL 5/C4.23 -
I 1 PROP. 24 RJ GATE VALVE - - - - - - - -
CONTROL AND TRAFFIC` CONTROL DETAILS. -
\ 1/C4.27 \ \ \ x \ \ 32 - - -- - - -- -
J SEE DETAIL \ ` - \\ \ \ PROP. TEMP. SILT \ \ \ fix\ \ \ - ° -
" \.__- -
2. USE DETAIL 4/C4.33A FOR WORK ALONG US HWY 421 BETWEEN \ ®(- - \ - - :_- = �- \ \\ / - FENCE, TYPICAL. \ \ \ \ \x \ AC7
_ . - PROP. WIRE AND STONE - - - - - - •. l% -\ \ \ \ \ APPROXIMATE STAl10NS 419 +50 AND 434 +50: _�/ \ SEE DETAIL 2/G0.6 \ ` , ` - _ - REINFORCED OUTLET, TYPE 1 / / - _ / \ \ \ \ e uF LECTRIC \ \ \x !-/1 - - t - - - - - - _
/ - ( INSTALLED AT LOW POINT. / \/ / - -` MEMBERSHIP CORP. \ o _ O
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW STANDARD NCDOT DIVISION 11 TRAFFIC ...\ ' -- I / / I l`- \ \ \ 1 0a. 074 ec sot \ moo \ � \
"'" ° /'' / \ ( SEE DETAIL 4 G0.5 X Las 6 WATSON FAMILY IRUSr - -; - '- - - -- -. �' "'
CONTROL DETAILS. LEFT LANE CLOSURE IS REQUIRED IN AREAS OF - /' \�( W / / / / / 1� / ``_ / w ow _I \ / \ 1465 y 5 6es - -
WATER LINE INSTALLATION , SEE DETAIL 3/C4.29 (STANDARD NCDOT / - � \�. \ I / ° / , / - _ - - R - - - -'
/ / \ / / " / / ! / ow w� J 0 0' OFF EOP ' \ O - - - - _ - U
DETAIL 1101.02, SHEET 3 OF 15) / / / \ \�l" / CROSS UNDER 18 RCP / / / / / w� ow 3 °o \/ sxo , °
MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE 9
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 / // o / / �y0/ / / / °4,/ LI_ 48' kP \ \ ARE- / �� /N� xx.02•
CROSS UNDER 30 RCP r / 444 +00 445 +00 _ \ 0 48 CMP o ix y o CO
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE \ +00 w __ _ �ue� x wu. = 3776.57' / �� $ t + z
443 446 +00 re CA7P \ �� rn C
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 j _ INV. = 3176,.6�f�
\ j `V� ....., • -. '- o / / / '� \�, I \ / 1 1 I I / l °w ' 447.1- p1�_...� -- -=' d'w x .448 ±00
TB - - -- - / - -- /.'
o- ''1\/ / / // /' /� / J /f / 2 OFF EOP- - // 'e' � �'� °_� �. �q ' / / '- _ 0
.`C g \° - -
�_. _ �Q �. �'.�.,\ / / J / �.. \ /
-=T - - /' lNV. 6374;39' m 1 INV. / / �° yw -. - -. / ' '•�
_7B_ / -- INV = J701. 72•.. / .� / / .� -"•'• I'
437100 ---,J o - -k' R/Y7_�= - \ 3146.10' / I - --TB- � / /
38 +00 `_ Mkt _ -+ LoD 44 / i I / / /' / ,/ _ / / ' /� - (i)
��-�i 439 +00 - - / / STA: 446 +601 / / -
5
"REVISED PER NCOOT.
8/5/14
4 '.
:UPDATED PROPERTY. LINES -
3/18/14
3 -
REVISED WATER LINE ALIGNMENT TO MEDIAN
2/5/14
2
STA: 436 +30
10/16/12
1
EROSION. CONTROL RENSIONS PER NCDENR
END 24" DIAMETER
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
-
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
-
DOUBLE WRAP PIPE WITH
8 MIL. POLYETHYLENE WRAP
oW- 10' EACH DIRECTION FROM
�- GAS LINE INTERSECTION.
STA: 435 +861
1 - PROP. 24" RJ 22.5' BEND
N: 916984.32
®
E: 1251155.76
BEFORE YOU M
STOP
MINIMUM 5' COVER AT
RZ ��
GUARD RAIL CROSSING
CENTM
rrs ns'u►w
- 7 REVISED 'CROSSING IMPACT LABEL PER NCDENR COMMENTS
2/17/15
` 6
RENSED'COORDINATE. PRECISION
°
2/12/15 -
5
"REVISED PER NCOOT.
8/5/14
4 '.
:UPDATED PROPERTY. LINES -
3/18/14
3 -
REVISED WATER LINE ALIGNMENT TO MEDIAN
2/5/14
2
MINIMUM. STORM DRAINAGE SEPARATION REVISED: PER NCDOT
10/16/12
1
EROSION. CONTROL RENSIONS PER NCDENR
8/14/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
INV. OUT- 3149.15'
RCP
= 3148.72'
PAVEMENT REPAIR, TYP.
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24
(1
/
/
/
i
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1" =50'
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
JKI MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.HI
n E NAME
80376 -BOONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
�w (628) 327 -6911
//��\ /� NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
_V9 'v Office Locations:
W DICK�ON
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
ROUND.DWG South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
BIDDING
- - --
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
- - --
BEGIN 24" DIAMETER / / /
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE // / / /� 3' OFF EOP / /' / ' / ' / / - ` - LU
/ij STA: 448 +721 " / / / / / / `- W
1 - PROP. 24" RJ GATE
CROSS UNDER 18" CMP bl // / 4� SEE DETAIL 1/C4.27
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE / / / /
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 / / / // ° / j �/ STA: 448 +821 Q
1 -PROP. 24" RJ 90' BEND / 323 z
BEGIN DIVISION 3
STA: 450 +541
4� / a / 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 90' BEND
END DIVISION 3 -
/ STA: 450 +641
1 - PROP. 24" RJ GATE VALVE __,0
/ SEE DETAIL 1/C4.27 J
S�/ GRAPHIC SCALE Q
50' 25' 0' 25' 50' 100' Z
x
U-
1" 50'
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
24" RAW WATER LINE
STA. 419 +25 TO STA. 451+50
.4.42

N_S Q
~YU'
Q3�
°
ro
Zz�
VOA
WVW
iEzw
a
v -
FrN
�¢ZF
on, .
` 6WZ5
zwzm
° J
Y�2Q
STA: 488 +971
1 - PROP. 24" RJ 45° BEND
N: 920450.10 `
\- 3090 / \ E: 1247872.47
RONALD L KELLEY, and wife
SHARON K KELLEY \ \ \, / �" -`' '- -- MICHAEL XCORNETTS -
C \\ \\ \\
BR: 084 PG: 234 \ \\ \ \ / ` _ `\ \---- - - - - -- _ BR.. 1315 PG: 460 r'
BRAD M KELLEY, CHRISTA R KELLEY ,1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \ - - - - '- - - - - - - - - - - -
\ l BR: 729 PG: 625 '
5,\� PROP. TEMP. SILT \`= --------- - - - - -\ _ - -- - -- J
\ FENCE TYPICAL. '�.--------- - - - - -- \ \`
4f INV, m 3073 i9 15' CpP\ \ .� ` \ \ ,� ` �. ` �.- �„• \. 10
ANNA H BANDAGE l \ \ X00 \ INV. - 307a6164 \ " \ \ \ - \ ` ""`` , J'11 _ - _
BR- 808 PG: 561 , �` SEE DETAIL 2 /GO.6 �c:c \ 48• CMP - -.-.� \
INV, a 3071.07 � � --, \ ` �. - - _ -.� \ �.._.- ''• I ` ...-. - - _ - - _ _ �
_� -- , P 7714 - +aJU \\ \. \ \ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .`_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ -, 1 \ \
\ \ \\ \ 2' OFF EDP \ \ \\ �_ __ �� -� ` -- \ \ \` \_ _` = = - - -- - - _ - -_� - - - -- SEED IL. / 4.1 - -- --
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ PROP. INLET _ _ _ - J -
_ PROTECTION, TYP- -
g° \�_ -0' ' _ ETA 4 G -
Ipa�` \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ B ze 6 \ /� - _ __ = \� - -- 2' OFF EOP - _ _ - - �_`' __ i o
OW OW --OW nw_ ",--OW -` �• --0�" ` -_' - - - - �- _- 309
YZUQ �\ /001 X o ow 048 -' �'P Ow \ "- - -_ '-------- - - - - -- - - - -- - PROP. TEMP. FIBER CHECK '` r
NV m 3070.10 OW OW Ow Ow --•.,o r _"r
kz - Ow - - ow- - ow- r!`'\ - GRAVEL- - DAM TYPICAL
- ``oW \ BROWNDYO nR4E - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- SEE DETAIL 5/GO.5 - m
ow_ J
a�xa ,A _- \ \\ \\ °w \o 495-.'L
'---------------- - - ---'
080 `S n \ w
PAVEMENT REPAIR TYP. \ \ \ �`` ow 73 0 - l
\ STA: 489 +971 \���`�R'Sg) - ------------- - - - - -- �I - 3070
- - SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24 \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ END 24" DIAMETER - - _ °w\ �� 15.
( _ _ \ \ \ \ \ RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE - - "�,_ -
-_147 3061.27' r1n _.�.- ?hqY'� i ) 1
_ _ - - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ CROSS UNDER 15" CPP - - -'_o / 4� TJ� V --
;�' - STA: 487 +57R \ \\ \\ \ \ \ MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE / ow >�"'- ON m
PROP. BELOW GRADE WATER \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 - - - - - - - - - �- W -ow- ow!
MAIN BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY. \ \ \ \ xz- -
- SEE DETAIL 2/C4.26 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ o \ \ NO I x�- x= x` ow-�-- /
BARB i{1RE FENCE OV/ Ow \
1. CMP - ` >- -OW
INV. ®3059.90" / w
' - - - - STA: 487 +671 \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ ®\ \ _ -
1 - PROP. 24" RJ GATE VALVE \ \ \ o9O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ MEADOW CREEK 4, IMPACT S7 \ \ ' - / / /
SEE DETAIL 1/C4.27 \ \ \ \ \ \
! / 2 OFF EOP /
' \ \ \ \ \ SEE DETAILS 1/G4.1 AND 2- 5/G0.7 \ \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ PAVEMENT REPAIR, TYP. !! /
STA: 487 +741 \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED ANTI \ \ !/ - SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24 !
BEGIN 24 DIAMETER \ \ \ TYP. \ \ !
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE \ \ \ SEEPAGE COLLAR,
\ \ \ SEE DETAIL 5/C4.23
` STA: 488 +241
1 - PROP. 24" RJ 22.5' BEND
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PROVIDE 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER \ \
LINE AND STORM PIPES. / l
2. CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO PROPER PRE- CONSTRUCTION
CONDITION ALL UTILITIES (STORM DRAINAGE, ETC.) AFFECTED BY \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `� \ \ _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - -. - - - - - - - - - - / / / / , oo ,
CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED WATER LINE.
JERRY BROV/N AND \
l / \ LAURA A BROWN /A t
DR. 259 PG: 884 _ \ \ „� \ - / LAURA LEE BROWA' (TRUSTEE) - - - ' I _.- "' / /.3'F\ / / ! / / 4 \ \ \ WANDA SHORT, and husband '
MACKIE, THOMAS & LENNA BROWN _ . __ ! / / \ \ \ \
/ ( \ _ _ r JAMES B. NOC. 7 SR. ! ! ! / \ ` \ BR: 039 PG: 570 "-
r - - - -. - ._ - -� '' - BR: 232 PC: 712 / \
PROTECTION, TYP. 4/G4
SEE DETAIL - - - - - -- - --
LAWRENCE OTIS GREEN
"\ \\ \ \�- ` - -- - - -- . .1
LA \ `.• - - - - -
BR: 666 PG " r -. -� ,� �"` _--_• �- _ r „ / / / / !! ! ! / /1 \ \ i \ , \ \\ \\ \ 1. a
TRACT CROSS UNDER 18 CMP`\.\ �,.,_.._.----- --- - -_ ,�-- ���� -�,,� - -_ -- •`-- --i �i �' /// / ! ! / / \ \ \ \ �: �. `'-�„`_` Z
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE ` \ - - - - - - - - -
`�`'' YR '" / \
GENEVA G HENNESSEE. / \ \ -. -
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 �. ` - _.,.. -- - - - - ` �_ - - - - / / ^z ! \ \ \ \ „_•__
and husband _ _DAWD L HENNESSEE 2' OFF EOP - -- - ' \ ` - _ - - - - - - - r \ ` - - - - -�„ --_ _ / / / / / \ \ \\ \ \ \ 8R: 1277 PG: 036 / / - -
! - PROP. TEMP. FIBER CHECK _ _ _ - 2' OFF EOP . _ - - - _ f / / \ \ \ \ ` _ - - - - - W W _I - -- �/ /� - - - DAM, TYPICAL - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - / \ _ -e- _- l r�'rl SEE DETAIL 5/GO.5 - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ,- - -_ _ _ / / //' \\ \PROP. INLET `� W d z I =^ _ _ -` i - - - - - - -- / \ PROTECTION, TYP. ...,i v / - -- - -''' 7s'NOPE 40• HEMLOC _s '„`. \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '- - CATCH BASIN M/DODEN SEE DETAIL 4/G4.1 `` --- - - - - -- �- --------- - - - - -- roP SRA7F_ 302826' 3046p3t' 16' CMP 7 I o � \. - r / \ -. J CO
1 INV.m3047.72' �11 ' `���. __ - --. -- _ - ' --- --- I '�- - - -.-. I _- -- .--- . - - - -- -- - /'''� 'SCE /XV IN --5R5.04' \ "^- r
--.. T - _ d4
-- _. _. _ _ - - - - - 1Y` �298Y- r S CMP 30 INV. OUT W O
504+ ?. � 18" CMP - - -- - -
(_
�Q�i+nn �coe/ 1 wV. - 3038.66' -
# $ - y - - - - - - - - - - -5
W W - BROt�N � --R-D l SiA
W
W O 18' CMP i SR 159) U
INV. - 3D47- - - - - LIALP
+J / ON ---' - ` ' - -
- Lli
3 INV. - 3045.'i' V n
PIPE FOUND
OW 18' CUP o
Va 3024.32'
/ 30' CMP l
CROSS UNDER 18" CMP PAVEMENT REPAIR, TYP. \ \ 1 / INV = 3036.86' - / r ow OW� oW / \ \ INV. a 302300'
MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24 / - - - / / ow ow ow ow - -
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 °W ow ow oWow
! / CROSS UNDER 18" CMP / / / / / / / CROSS UNDER 30" CMP 1 Lj
1 REMOVE AND REPLACE DRIVEWAY / / " 1
( CULVERTS AS NECESSARY. NEW MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE / � .,, / r ,. / / MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
/ SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 / / - - / SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 O
DRIVEWAY CULVERT PIPE SHALL BE RCP / r / r ' - - DEFLECT PIPE AS NECESSARY
\ \ MATCHING THE EXISTING PIPE DIAMETER, TYP. / / - - - / / / / \ / // / / AROUND CATCH BASIN z
CROSS UNDER 18" CMP z
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0
\ \ \ SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
BEFORE YOU DIM \
J
STOP GRAPHIC SCALE
CALL IE80 50' 25' 0' 25 50, 100, z
1 „_50
6
REVISED CROSSING IMPACT LABEL PER NCDENR COMMENTS
2/17/15
5
REVISED COORDINATE PRECISION
2/12/15
4
REVISED. PER NCDOT
8/5/14
3
EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND EASEMENT REVISED
3/18/14
2
MINIMUM STORM DRAINAGE SEPARATION REVISED PER NCDOT
10/16/12
1
EROSION CONTROL REVISIONS PER NCDENR
8/14/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
/V W, W ,n�
24" RAW W
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
DRAWING SCALE
1 " =50'
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
�K NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
�DICKSON Office Locations:
community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
FROLIND.OWG South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
'Cm
a� CA/1®. c®
®�� . °pyOO °0g °. B✓ °®
` �.SS / ® ® °° 2 ®mm
�; e9
a S
4
m n
°m �F�GIN�,�e': Q a0a°
APPROVALS
----
DRAWN BY
JKI
PROJECT DATE
MARCH 2015
BIDDING
- - --
APPROVED BY
BLT
PR OJECT NUMBER
80376.00.HI
CONSTRUCTION
----
FILE NAME
80376 -SOCNE RAW
WL- CONVERTED TO
RECORD DWG.
- - --
/V W, W ,n�
24" RAW W
WATER L
LINE C
C4.1 7
STA. 484+50 T
TO STA. 5
516 +50 4
4.42

z OP. INLET ( ( ( I
8
PR / / 1 /
� / / / / / / / / / / /
/ PROTECTION. TYP.
✓acx & NRGINrA M SMITH
SEE DETAIL. 4/04.1 DB: 93 Pc 6s \ / /,, / ,. - - •� ..,, 1
// '\ \ ( PROP. INLET
_ _ _ - - / / / / / / / / PROPOSED ANTI / / �,° ! / ( / / 1 PROTECTION, TYP. \
- - - - - - - - / / / j / / / // / / / / / / SEEPAGE COLLAR, TYP. / !! ( / \\ ` \ SEE DETAIL 4/G4.1
- - - - -_ j // // / / / // // / SEE DETAIL 5/C4.23 ! / / ! /
oaf wA +DA SHORT and husbortd - _ / / / / / / - - - - - / / - _ - / i' / / // / /' / / / / STA: 527 +761
¢zo DONALD SHORT // // /- -- ' 3130 `' - -- - -- �' /' / /- - - - - -- / r'/ / / // / / 1 - PROP. 24 RJ 45' BEND
Roza BR: 039 PG: 570 - -_._ i... -^'"i // /� /-" / - -- - ...r,,.� r =_._ -. _..�'`! r'' -._ - -_ -. -- / / 'i/ /// / / ! ! ! \ \ \`- / // // //
_ ,- _ / / _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / / N: 924064.71
�8
- - - - - - - {'`f / / /'' - - - - -- _- -_ �/ / �/ /// �. // E: 1246660.13 1 ! / / ! l \ \ \\ \ \\ - / // / / /' \ \ \./ ` 1 { / 11 / ( t
wZ� - - - _- - __ / / / 110 / _ - -_ / - - -- -
___ - - - - -- _
�> --- - - - - -- - r - - ___ -- _ - e
-- ° - - - -- / - - - - -- - E0 / / / / / / s \\ \ \ \ \ JACK n.RCINrAS.Mrx
'm - - - / - - - - ._ ,�,... _ _ r r �- - _ -- '' '... '• / _ '' OFF / / / /! No \ / TOP GRATE �A 29929245' \ \\ \ \ \ -0B: 8u' PG,• 1 "8 11 2;,e .- - - - -. - - - .._ - - - - ._ - - - _ _. ` ' �'� / / / ' - - - - - - _ '� ..."_ - _ - _ / �, / -" �... _ ' ` _ -,� _',.� " .` .'- "� �,..... r- '� i "'' 2, .rF ./ P / / / / / �" \ \ \ \ \ • •� - -.r / r f8•_ CL /NV.us 2995.095.60' \ \
- - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - ( �... / / / / / r 3090 _ / _ ' ' / r '` .,.. _ _ _ .-- �" "' ' / / / / / / \c "1'5001.05, ' CMP \ 58' NEA/LOOy \ - 2994.95. tl1 ...- / / / / _ _ _ . ' _ "- / -�-� ._,_ / / Q \ HEM( \ / 24" CYP INK OUT - 299500'`..,- 4 _ „ --- / / - J - _ _ / / 4j ?4- OCK .. _ .- - - - - - -..- -. _ - -..- 1" / / ./� / - _ - � - _ -„ -- � ,,,, � _ I I / i j LMP �O,�EM[OC/r 18" CMP / S� / •' � \ \ \ \\ ` \ \ \ \ \ \
- -- _ - - - -_ -- .- - -- - i/./ // /�__ __ �.. _ i1, �-i� '- .i^ _ I _ i ='" I` =. �„ -..-' _ rr // 1/�CY. ®30 .JO' - _ L Inv. 2,994,,52
(c pl O ~�`\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \l \ \.\\ \ \
a-mm - -- - - - - ° -- -- - - - - -- ��i /i / - _ 3070 -�; w f -- / / -e - 18 2' OFF EOP \ \ \ \\ \ \\
tom - -- - - ---- _ °-- ! / //i fie.- 30524flE _- �. - /SR ?359) - ��ow-- �_oiin
..-- - - - - _ .- - -- ' - _ / �, r /' / / •' 'SV�u_ nn- °- OW'"'� '' / - ",- /' ' r /
INV. 2993.32' uw- _.�,_OW /
$xsa _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -INV. @ 3024.77' BEGIN S24" DIAMETER / / /
00
- - _ _ oW� i`�~ - _ - - - - - --
- - - _ - - + -- /' �%i- °w - I _ _ = = - _ RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE / / -
1 • ' r �„ -- ..-� -- r".- / STA: 527 +491 / ,--
(1I?T -- -_-� °- ow _ _ -- -_- -
/ 1 PROP 24" RJ 45' BEND
_ o _ ow r 3010 - - -- /
TRIBUTARY 6, IMPACT S8 U
slave
SEE DETAILS 1 /G4.1 AND 2- 5/00.7
PAVEMENT REPAIR, TYP. "/ ,�.- ''� --'
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24 -'' I / STA: 528 +361
PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND
PROP. 24" DIP RAW WATER LINE \ ! N: 924123.76 °
3 FT. MIN. COVER. E: 1246650.80 \
-- _-
:�� 2' OFF EOPyJ_
J \ \ STA: 528 +591
' CROSS UNDER 18" CMP \ \ 1 - PROP. 24 RJ 45' BEND
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE \ N: 924142.55
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 ! E: 1246664.46
i r
\ STA: 529 +59f
\ END 24" DIAMETER
` \ RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PROVIDE 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER - - - - It
LINE AND STORM PIPES. - - _ - - - - - - - / / / / / ! It
2. CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO PROPER PRE - CONSTRUCTION 8 F - __ 3050- RRY IsA lrN / / / / / / ! l
JAMES F SMITH and wile RICKI_ JANE S141TH \ •�`'�
CONDITION ALL UTILITIES STORM DRAINAGE, ETC. AFFECTED BY I JOHN S SMITH and w,Ae JDANN SMITH BR: 084 PC: 094 /
GEORGE T SMITH and wife SHERYL D SMITH V A v _ - -- -
CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED WATER LINE. I BR: 757 PG: 287 \ \ - - - _ - - - - _ - _ - _ - _ / / / / lI (( t /1 D4 \ \
JACK & VIRGINIA SMITE
D8: 86 PG 168 \ \ \ \\ - -- - 3030
It /
_ -'/ � !/ ! l ( ( ' 6: ssPROP. TEMP. FIBER CHECK N2969.2;" \--- - - - - -- DAM TYPICAL -
SEE DETAIL 5 /GO.5
1) 60 04P
24 \ --- - - - - -- '' - - - __ -- / INV. - 2969.00'
IN *R 2 :2 2 CC7��6.94' - _
/ / / // / �, •..- - ,- _ - - ..- r /" / ! ! ! ( I ! / / / \ N�V 1 �129T/.80 - - - V. 1 B• 9 Oi /3 '
/ �/ - - -- - --- STA: 537 +641 \4 PCB _ __ - -- /� C
- 3070 - r / /' 1 - PROP. 24" RJ GATE VALVE I / ! / / \ \ INV..L2`7B14s - - - - 2990 3 -.
�r ------ - - - - -- SEE DETAIL 1/C4.27
-. -- -- - - - - -- � / / / / / ! I/ ! / / / \\ \� � - - '� (SR 1359) 8''-
_ D Nv. -
3050 - -- ------ - - - - -- '_ - / �/ / / // / // // \ .\ - - -- '- RpWNW00D R _- -- -
i - - - - --- - -- - - - - - -' - / /'• / i'qy J, � ' /
r / / / / - - - - l �/ �.-' -' CV{' / ' / ', _- Ow--.'•-SSY'^ - W
"' '�•,,,, ._ " .,,,. r ." ^" ....• -.- - - - - - - ' / /' / / / / /r / / / OW /' �� ' _- �' '� / ' / ��' �Ow6','.'...-OW ---"OW •.• 0 OW
r ��
3030 _ - _ - - - / / i / / / �JOW /./ ' ow Ov40'- 2870 6X4 CMP
_ .- - - ..- - .-. -. -- - _ /' ./� J 12• -$CP D1R. -- - -. ' p /' / INV. ,. 2963
_,--------- - -...- � / / / / / 4/ �, r'.. r;' �' f J, .i
- - _ - - la 4' PVC DIR. / STA: 544 +11 t
BEGIN 24" DIAMETER _
_ - - -3010 `- - - - - - vw� �. -INV. D' ow-- '`"'OW - �c _ / / / / RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE /r -
_ _ - - - ` °W- ;r oW X24p / / 2' OFF EOP CROSS UNDER 18" CMP /
_ _ __ _
- - - _ - - - - _ .-•.' ' `'�..- /NY. 4 297515' »
Ltd - - - - - ` - \\ 24' CMp / / MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE I
Ld LLJ _ - - - - - - - _ _ - \ INV.. - 2975.33' / / f SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
_
- a ° / r NY , cuppp !l \ \\ N / / ® TRIBUTARY 5, IMPACT S9
/ SEE DETAILS 1/G4.1 AND 2- 5/GO.7
U = 299 'm °l l / / (\a - - - - - - - - _ STA: 546
w, -mO- ' - "O r / / \\, - - _ - - `\ \ _ ` ` END 24" DIAM
I' I" Io MO _ ! / / v _ - _ - - - - ` - - RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER
- m ! - - PROPOSED ANTI 7
( / - 2 70.AO _ _ - - ' ` ` _ SEEPAGE COLLAR, TYP.
/ 2 OFF EOP SEE DETAIL 5/C4.23
M0_ PAVEMENT REPAIR, TYP. I CROSS UNDER 24" CMP C
o- SEE DETAIL 6 C4.24 I " MAINTAIN 18" MIN.
M / MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE �- / / ,� / / /, / / r _ - _ �.- _- •�
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
/ STA: 537 +541 / -
/ PROP. BELOW GRADE WATER
/ MAIN BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY.
/ SEE DETAIL 2/C4.26
PROP. INLET
891 YOU py ! PROTECTION, TYP.
/ SEE DETAIL. 4/G4.1 r '
STOP _ _ - - - -- '
Kc. ONE�Cdd. �' i - - - - - -
�Pi
6 -.
CROSSING IMPACT PER.NCDENR COMMENTS
2/17/15
5..
REVISED COORDINATE .PRECISION
2/12/15
4
' REVISED PER NCOOT -
8/5/14
3
EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND EASEMENT REVISED
3/18/14
`2
MINIMUM STORM DRAINAGE SEPARATION REVISED PER NCOOT
10/16/12
1
EROSION CONTROL REVISIONS PER NODENR
8/14/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
IL REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALEry �A •.9k�a
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201 RELEASED FOR DATE % o
RWH 1 " =50' ����, ®e° °SS7'... , �OOm
HICKORY, NC 28602
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE �WK (828) 327 -6911 APPROVALS - - -- 'tea <p � o
JKI MARCH 2015 /� NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER D'� �` O■ BIDDING ---- o m
BLT 80376.00.HI -\/1 ' V Office Locations: a °
FILE NAME community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION ---- a
o°
South Carolina RECORD DWG. - - --
80376�OONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO ROUND.DWG m
2994.70' - w \ \ \ \
- \ \
6.5' OFF EOP
CROSS UNDER 18" 'CMP 'o
r MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
I SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 80 18\' CMP
Y. O�
2986.51'
(\ 410
C3
BONNIE JEAN BROWN
HR: 395 PG: 375
I STA: 545 +121
I 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND I
N: 925646.61 \ '
E: 1247232.19
/
--
I x
�`X4 CMP\
361 NV. 29 \2 \ %1 n \ \ \ \ \ \ \ + _ 1 �....1 � '� -. - ' f ✓^' \ O
)2• '� \ \ \ 1 BETTY E w III ..•� ,,,r.� \
A,.ppp<f� \ \ \
BR• 1043 PC; G: 171
RIVE
"�- •-.. -•.. ti - 7H07,?AS°GODY Y /A7SON 7<
�•OIY •` +. `' kRISTEN LILLY
�'� -SOW •,� \ ` "' --. -BR: 1686 PG :462
- \
-ta' CMP �` \
I OW LL
�°Y7
Q.
lb LIJ
18 CUP
IN V. ® 296565' \ W
t 2' INSIDE EOP �V�� _!
°w LL!
IE
O
SS UNDER 18" CMP PAVEMENT REPAIR, TYP, / z
:RTICAL CLEARANCE SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24 I
EE DETAIL 6/C4.23 z
U)
/ LL!
\ 0
GRAPHIC SCALE Q
50' 25' 0' 25' 50' 100' z
LL.
1,, _ 50
24 RAW WATER LINE C4.1
STA. 516 +50 TO STA. 549 +00 4.42

.- - -_..- // l / / // // \ t { � \ \ \\ \ 3030 „ "
i'O / \ \ \ - - - ' r / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ r / INSET '
zw i i j \\ \\ \\ \ _ /./ �/ // / \ t 1 1 \ \ \\ \ \ 43
r BETTY £ VIA TSON ,i- \
m c°i° -""� f �� f I ( i ( j / - - \ \ \ \ '"'• - �- PROP. INLET / / / / '� \ \ \ \ ` SR: 1043 PG: 111 \ \ \ \ \ \ - - / / - - \ �/ JERRY &LAURA BROWN,
\ \ MACKI£ L TUCKER,
- - - - - - - - - PROTECTION, TYP. / r \ \ \ / \ e� / STA: 565 +571
\ \ t \ \ �.. \ THO;dAS J BRON, CEANNA
- - - - - _ SEE DETAIL. 4 G4.1 / r \ \ \ \ \ \ o \ \ - - \ ' / BR: i13 BROWN 48 "
/ / I I i V /
f ( / / - 1 \ \ -'' - - - -. / \ \ \ \ \ \ 'o \ �/' 1 -PROP. 24 RJ 45' BEND
- - -- // / // \ \ \ \\ \ - -- \ \ BRATF N: 926264.31.
/ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / j: o. E: 1249083.16
/ / ( / \ \ \ ' ' r PROP. TEMP. FIBER CHECK / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - ` \ 7
\ / I l 1 j / \ - DAM, TYPICAL ' - \ \ \ 2 OFF EOP \ - - `
- - -« - "
/ \ \ \ \ \ } STA: 565 +401
l / \ \\ r -� / SEE DETAIL 5/130.5 ,, -� \ \ � \ •� '' -- \ /
_ ' 1 -PROP. 24 RJ 45' BEND
\ 42 r / /.J //•\\ \ \� `o __/ -\ 000 \\ \ ` \�� 29g��� �� - \ \ / cr h$ N: 926267.36
08 \ / / I / / \ \ _ _ - - wu. 2s�58s9'\ -� \ \ \ } o. / E: 1249065.96
°ow \ THOMAS CODY WATSON & / �/ / 0%1
KRISTEN LILLY / / l / / - -' /
h z _BR: 1686 PG: 462 "/ / l / / IT.
~ \ \ / / • -. ' ` ' \ \ \ \ \ `�' -.' \ \ \ 4/ °Ce / (3;4 f / / / / / / / /
o W wm ,,., \ •\ •• ` ••_. - _..- ^-- ..- i � / / / I / / / / � "-24° 6MP- "'
I w_ ow � _ - - - _ _ _ - \ \ PROP, .
24" WATER LINE
oA MIN. 15' FROM BRIDGE
Va24ssIN a84 00 CROSS UNDER 24° CMP
/
. _ ow 1� // / 4/
oz MAINTAIN 18 " /
MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 \'ow `� \ \ \\ \ �� \ %.00 0�/ / / / / / / BILL CHURCH
SR. i IT
2 OFF EOP / \ \Ow� '-` " \ \ .. \ \ / / -/ SR: 213 PG 1046 j
�ffiN - CROSS UNDER 24" CMP r
°y- - - - - - -- - / " ow _ ; \ \ \\ \ \\ / / / STA: 564 +541
x_a< '� - - '- - ''� �F2a %a06 MAINTAIN 18 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE / \ \ \ \ / / / / /
B r �•. "^' INV. = Zssaos . \ \ \ / / / 1 PROP. 24 RJ 45' BEND / t CRA
O°<�Q 4 - / SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23
N4 °y PAVEMENT REPAIR, TYP. '
��sa r oW °W - SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24
01 i / 2' INSIDE EOP
CP
IT
\ `.-------------------
TYP. \\ _ / - - - - - - - - - - - - -
r r
CREEK CROSSING - STA. 564 00 TO A. 56-
2950 2950
2948
2946
2944
5
ADDED CREEK CROSSING PROFILE PER NCDOT
GRAPHIC SCALE ` I
5 0 5 10 €
-
2948
2946
2944
1 ( t {
3
'
I ? 1 i
VERT. SCALE: 1" = 5'
€
I
-_�
I
10/16/12
2942
-J-4-7
DATE
RFVISIONS
-
--
- EXISTING
GROUND
t
2942
2940
I I I
I -
2940
2938
I
I..
2938
2936
7
I
{
2936
2934
i {
I
2934
2932
2930
2928
2926
564+00
3i .._ i
�- PROP. 24" DIP RAW WATER LINE
3 FT. MIN. COVER. 2932
STREAM CROSSING #10 2930
SEE DETAILS 1/134.1 & 2- 5/G0.7
PROPOSED ANTI i ± '_, 2928
SEEPAGE COLLAR, TYP. I {
SEE DETAIL 5/C4.23 j 2926
566 +00 566+50 567 +00
I
564+50
565
+00
565+50
N: 926218.34 t $
/ // / / / j / E: 1248995.85 a
\\`os wv. 44:7&
REMOVE AND REPLACE DRIVEWAY
ow \ SPLIT RAIL FENCE AND VEGETATION
1' INSIDE EOP \ow \\ \ // / /
IT
R,sL
w U5
1 \mow ` - / /
/ 12' RCP /,/�' .-
/ pNX_a f
294287' �o Ow
CROSS UNDER 12" RCP ow IT
MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE ow
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23 2' OFF EOP
�o v1 f IT
\ \ \ \\ STA: 564 +341 IT
\ 14a' cMwhj, °\ 1 - PROP. 24" RJ 45' BEND ( / ( IT SEE INSET "A"
\\ C \tea �•� N: 926198.11 I j l I I THIS SHEET
\ ` \ E: 1248992.27 ) 1 I I I
\ \ STA: 563 +341 \ PROPOSED ANTI /f / ) 1 j I ! I
\ BEGIN 24" DIAMETER 1 SEEPAGE COLLAR, TYP.
\\ RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE 1 SEE DETAIL 5/C4.23
\ \ \ tt MEADOW CREEK 3, IMPACT S10
\\ \ SEE DETAILS 1/G4.1 AND 2',5/130.7 1 t�
\ \� IT /
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PROVIDE 18 VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER
LINE AND STORM PIPES.
2. CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO PROPER PRE - CONSTRUCTION I JERRY & LAURA BROWN,
HACKIE C WUCXER, / / r / / / / �/ / ' : / J i'•
CONDITION ALL UTILITIES (STORM DRAINAGE, 'ETC.) AFFECTED BY THOMAS J BROWN, LEANNA
CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED WATER LINE. Al BR: 1648 PG. 48
_- ..._
/
--
CC I
_ PROP. TEMP. SILT 45
- - - -- -/ / // FENCE, TYPICAL. // // -- - - - - - � -,- - - _- ` \\ I
\ \\ \ \`' \• `- --- - - -- -- �/ /' SEE DETAIL 2/G0.6 / / // --�`�' �"' _ - -_ -`--` - I -- \ \ RONALD SIDNEY COOPER& I -
\. / �--' �' "'• ,� - \ ��. \ \ DONALD
365 LEE COOPER
(WA TAUGA CO) �' 0
- - - - PROP. WIRE AND STONE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NCGS
REINFORCED OUTLET, TYPE 1
INSTALLED AT LOW POINT. / / / /- j / / / / / -`" oW-� _ 5j7 \ \ \ \ MONUMENT "BROWNWOOD AZ" lPy
\1\P`.``� \5 S \`` \� \\ SEE DETAIL 4/130.5
.A l
�8X 00
\ \ \ 6 Q
INY.,•- 9 T4 11✓ ,✓/ / /',. / / .,� \ \ �, \ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \
/ PAVEMENT REPAIR, TYP.
SEE DETAIL 6/C4.24 TA ;
576 +821 130 /
BEGIN 24" DIAMETER
_ 1 LAP
--ow ' •,:ow- _�.� -' � - - - � � � -- - _ � , - �...�•.� -.� .. ,� / / // / / � � � /' / /.� / ' / fi- - RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
-ow- v.. �W _ _057 ow-
2!--=
5' INSIDE EOP
\ \"'."" : / / / / /-_ "'- --"' -. _ _ �' `� 'mow.,. \ _`�• \ \\ _' 'ri",r '.r "� /a/ �•� /�/ �. i' / / i"r // ' /'r '' - \\ \\ \ � \ \ \ ` t t t
/� _ \ \ \ \ \ TEMP. GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION t \ 1
---------- - - - - -� \ �\ _ / - - \ \ \ ENTRANCE /EXIT, TYP.
\ \ \ SEE DETAIL 1 /GO.5
STA: 566 +57f
END 24" DIAMETER \ - / . / / . / / / / / / / -- �- - \ \ STA: 579 +091 ( I ( 1 I
_ _ 2' INSIDE EOP / " 1 - PROP. 24 RJ 90' BEND I
\ / / RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE �, \ CROSS UNDER 18 CMP - - - - - ( /
/ _ _ N: 927505.83 /
/ l f / f / ,. - - - - _ , _ _ ' •-._. ` �- , \ \ \ \ \ \ / / MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE � ' � •"
I _----- - - - - -- `` ~ \ \ \\ \\ \ \- �// / / / SEE DETAIL 6/C4.23j / � i - -- \ l Ea 1249/52!14 % 1/ IT /( / I
/ STA: 565 +81f
III / / 1 PROP. 24' RJ 11.25' BEND \ \ / / / / / / j /
N: 926277.73 _ - - - - - - - _ - \ \ / / / / / / _ , STA: 579 +191 / /
I \ ` \ \ ~ \ \ ' / / / / / / / / / / 1 - PROP. 24" RJ GATE VALVE / / / I
l ( r1 E: 1249102.18 - \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / SEE DETAIL 1/C4.27 IT
/ !I
e�oBerauote , / / / /..-f f' - - -,..•. _ ��.� \\ \\ \ \� / / / / /// / /// // // /// �'" / L � f/ /I j1 / 1 / j f /j l
STOP / - - GRAPHIC SCALE //
c�u.asooeaz4wa / ~ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\\ / // / /// / // // // // / 50' 25' o' 25' 50' 100' � fffj ' /f /jjf /f /J jf I
NQ ONE-CALL CBliHR I
ms nR u►w
1" = 50'
7... REVISED CROSSING IMPACT LABEL. PER NCDENR COMMENTS 2/17/15
6.'
REVISED COORDINATE PRECISION..
2/12/1
5
ADDED CREEK CROSSING PROFILE PER NCDOT
11/4/14
4
REVISED. PER NODOT :
8/5/14
3
EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND EASEMENT REVISED
3/18/14
2
MINIMUM STORM DRAINAGE SEPARATION REVISED. PER NCDOT : -
10/16/12
1
INSET DETAIL ADDED PER NODOT
10/16/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
RFVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER I DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1 " =50'
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
JKI MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.HI
FILE NAME
80376 -BOONE RAW WIL- CONVERTED TO
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
�DICKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
ROUND,DWG South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
61 ° °'NG
- - --
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
- - --
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
36" CUP •C,
INV. - 2927.42'
A /00 /18' CUP
INV a 2928641 •_ ", •...,•...•`�'. -
ox
e \
INV. = 2937.35' 18" CMP x_`"�kz�,,,•Z"
✓L OW��y� INV. - 2930,99'
24" RAW WATER LINE
STA. 549 +00 TO STA. 581+50
0
0
0
z
rr1
V
W
Q
z
LL
4.1
4.42

I
ono � { `l \\7� �`� \`1111 1I \\ �``� \��` \`\ `' .,-•
v`
ir?ico ` �~ / , ' ``� / ; 1 i 111 \'• \ \�\
w� c {
v w 2X
o0 1
°gQ C5 r 583 +00 i q
€mow : 1nI
o z�
584 +0f
e}i \
YoVw 0� i \ \ "`�.` .."- ...--"--�
z
ca Mop \ \
UOON !.. \ \ 11 . I1\
\ \
STA: 582 +48f
1 END 24 DIAMETER
RESTRAINED JOINT DI WATER LINE
�-:� - `
STA: 582 +031 ` \\
` 1 — PROP. 24" RJ 22.5' BEND
~' \ \\ \N: 927755.35
E• 1248996.87 \
\ \\ \
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PROVIDE 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER
LINE AND STORM PIPES.
2. CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO PROPER PRE— CONSTRUCTION
CONDITION ALL UTILITIES, (STORM DRAINAGE, ETC.) AFFECTED BY
CONSTRUCTION. AND INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED WATER LINE.
3. SEE DIVISION :2 DRAWINGS FOR ACCESS ROAD AND EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES. 'COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF WATER LINE
WITH DIVISION 2 CONTRACTOR.
\` /\ CROSS UNDER 30"
MAINTAIN 18 MIN.
-J (/) SEE DETAIL 6/C4.2;
COORDINATE WITH C
,� T
X10-- MAU 7—
All
p
����...�'\ � \�\ \ `�. \'\•""fir.
\\
STOP
CAM I NO 01
Inca 'ns iuw"
\ \
LARRY COOPERARANDY COOPER,
AMY C GREER
D8: 1122 PG: 238
PIN: 2942 -68- 5570 -000 ��.
�... 500 YEAR nOODPLAIm
PROJECT MANAGER I DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
5
REVISED. CROSSING IMPACT LABEL PER NCDENR: COMMENTS
2/17/15
' 4
REMSED COORDINATE PRECISION -
2/12/15
3
REVISED EASEMENT DIMENSIONS
5/20/14
2
TOTAL SHEET NUMBER REVISED
2/20/14
' 1
MINIMUM STORM DRAINAGE. SEPARATION REVISED PER NCDOT
10/16/12
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
RFVISIONS
LARRY COOPERARANDY COOPER,
AMY C GREER
D8: 1122 PG: 238
PIN: 2942 -68- 5570 -000 ��.
�... 500 YEAR nOODPLAIm
PROJECT MANAGER I DRAWING SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH 1 " =50'
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
��8� (828) 327 -6911
APPROVALS
- - --
JKI MARCH 2015
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.HI
FlLE NAME
■ _ NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
r DICKSON Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
BIDDING
- - --
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
- - --
80376 -BOONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO
ROUND.DWG South Carolina
ii
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
I -E TB
/ /r
10' DIRT ROAD r
lip
i
:ESS ROAD /
DIVISION 2
/
/
/
1
GRAPHIC SCALE
50' 25' 0' 25' 50'
1" 50'
24" RAW WATER LINE
STA. 581+50 TO STA. 614 +00
�1
Z
N
Cam.
7s
0
LU ZU D
614 .1�.
LeU
Q C/) 0
0
co
0
LL
0
LLJ
d
LL
z
I
0
C/)
100' z
4.2 ,
4.42

E2 Q
z
�YfJ
0.
.0
o
yw
z
zIwm
.8 -M
ayU�
Ci xx Zw
~�
IN
Oyez
VZ�V
�wmw
OQO
r�aa
�Oyy
y .J
#FAN
/�OOO •O
G¢0,
sib¢
ax0y<
A
LARRY COOPER, RANDY COOPER,
AMY C GREER
D8: 1122 PG: 238
PIN: 2942 -68 -5570 -000
Z/,,� \�
BOONE, Tom OF
D9: 1425 PG: 405
PIN: 2942- 58 -3 }70 -000
STA: 618 +25t
CONNECT TO 24" DIP WATER LINE
END CONSTRUCTION — DIVISION 4
BEGIN CONSTRUC11ON — DIVISION 2
'... I...
AR
CUL 71 VA 7Eb FIE 3
Te _ _
616 +00
—292
n 6 �
}---_
5.
.•�yJ /
Ar/�' ��37 �•-- -�.3Ta a.�'305 —_,� ,--� -yam ,.%�` -••-'- -.-. -- __i � is � �p �'_--- ..��:'. '. -t `s �, +k
A
Irk
PROP. RAW WATER
INTAKE SITE ( /,a $�&
` DIVISION 2
/ / I "N %2 0 0
0.
/
CALL 1 800 632 -4949
N.C. ONE-CALL CENTER
IT'$ THE LAW
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1 " =50'
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
JKI MARCH 2014
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.H1
FILE NAME
50376 -BOONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(626) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
W D I C KSO N Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
3ROUNO.DW0 South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
- - --
I
TOTAL SHEET NUMBER REVISED
2/20/14
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION '
DATE
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH 1 " =50'
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
JKI MARCH 2014
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.H1
FILE NAME
50376 -BOONE RAW WL- CONVERTED TO
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(626) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
W D I C KSO N Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
3ROUNO.DW0 South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
- - --
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
- - --
10
/
/
/
�0
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
NOTE:
1) PROVIDE 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER
LINE AND STORM PIPES.
2) CONTRACTOR MUST RESTORE TO PROPER PRE - CONSTRUCTION
CONDITION ALL UTILITIES (STORM DRAINAGE, ETC.) AFFECTED BY
CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED WATER LINE.
z
0
F-
0
Z)
Ii
z
0
0
0
LL.
0
LL1
(D
Q
w
J
W
Iy
E--
0
z
z
W
J
GRAPHIC SCALE
<
50' 25' 0' 25' 50' 100' `
z
1 " =50'
24" RAW WATER LINE C4.2
STA. 614 +00 TO STA. 618 +04 4.42

0:
4a �
12 01
� I
5-�
MZ0
M0
KS
.L O20
t; q
QWM
J0_ 2
az;
:�oo,
ROG?
fDW
NOKJJ
Cy
00
Q7
xz a
0 z
LQ.�z
8050
13100
3110
RIVER CROSSING #1
P
T11
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
[phone]
j%,g01hWK NC LICENSE NO. F-0374
Office Office Locations:
community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
)ROUND.DWG South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
w
----
BIDDING
----
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
----
2
EXTENDED PROFILE PER NGDOT
11/4/14
1
TOTAL SHEET NUMBER REVISED
27s/14
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
L RF\A';IONI,;
P
T11
RIVER CROSSING #4
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
JKI SEPT. 2014
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.111
FILE NAME
80376 -BOONE RAW WL-CONVERTED TO
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
[phone]
j%,g01hWK NC LICENSE NO. F-0374
Office Office Locations:
community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
)ROUND.DWG South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
w
----
BIDDING
----
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
----
z
C14
Ir-
L0 _J w Ld Cq
3100
- -- ----- ---
-----
Cq
z LIJ
0 w
Z
M V)-
_j
I
<
C'4 L-2 LLI
- -------
+
_j Z
< C� <
w
_J
C-4 0 C14 Ld
------
... .. .
Z L&j
1- H (L
Ld Ld
C,4 M V)
N
'v)
< C) n Lj
Lj
(N L.
Ld
x
+
V)
_J
U
_j
zz
Z
z a- w
w
-Z
<
Cq C-4
- -- -------- -
--- ----
z
-1
C.0
00
a w
x x
w
a-
0
i 1
1 EXISTING GROUND
UJ
LU w_____
F71
------- I
----- --------
309(
w
+
w
(n <
0)
W V)
<
ow,
Do
< 04
C)
EXISTING 8" DIP
7
_j Of
t
_j
n -
-a:
V)
C-4 C-4
<
SAM17ARY SEVIER�
64 0 C
U-11-
---L-
0
13090
I
C
Al
711j,
---I----
EXISTING
GROUND
j
V
\"JI 11
-vl
3080
T
308C
A-----
1 --
L
3070
250'
RADIUS
-1
PROPOSED 24 HDPE
33+00 344-00 351-00
RIVER CROSSING #2
RIVER CROSSING #4
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
JKI SEPT. 2014
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.111
FILE NAME
80376 -BOONE RAW WL-CONVERTED TO
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
[phone]
j%,g01hWK NC LICENSE NO. F-0374
Office Office Locations:
community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
)ROUND.DWG South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
w
----
BIDDING
----
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
----
Z
_j
LLJ
Z
<
-----
----
(N L.
Ld
_J
U
zz
-H
z a- w
w
z
-1
C.0
00
a w
x x
UJ
LU w_____
z --
------- I
----- --------
309(
w
+
0)
W V)
<
ow,
Do
< 04
C)
1 (01
_j Of
t
_j
n -
-a:
V)
C-4 C-4
<
DO
64 0 C
U-11-
V)
(n
---I----
EXISTING
GROUND
V
\"JI 11
-vl
T
308C
A-----
1 --
L
EXJ5'77NG
18"
CMP-
3070
O
:2
1 A
....................
PROPOSED
P POSED
24" HDP
7
3060
,
2 5
RADIUS'
841-50
851­50
861-50
871-50
RIVER CROSSING #4
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
JKI SEPT. 2014
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
BLT 80376.00.111
FILE NAME
80376 -BOONE RAW WL-CONVERTED TO
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
[phone]
j%,g01hWK NC LICENSE NO. F-0374
Office Office Locations:
community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
)ROUND.DWG South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
DATE
APPROVALS
----
BIDDING
----
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
RECORD DWG.
----
RMTOORN&TOM
40 0 40 80
"6p%^ mmm'I
HQRZ. SCALE: 1" = 40'
GRAPHIC SCALE
4 0 4 8
VERT. SCALE: 1" = 4'
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
24" RAW WATER LINE
RIVER CROSSING PROFILES
�4.
z
0
0
D
LL
0
0
ct
0
W
W
_j
LL
W
0
Z
yJ
W
Z
U_
)0
.42

mT <
FY-U'
030
0
�2o�
�zz
Oyu
V
.VW
� %
n1w
Zip
O J
Y�26
�Oyy
y
YEVW
.0
V<8a
_o� oa
" �
y
Tao20
c0000
UNDISTURBED
SOIL (TYP.)
k
PLAN -BENDS
45'
18" MIN. -10" DIA. OR LESS
24" MIN. -12" DIA.. OR GREATER
SECTION X -X
BENDS & TEES
x
X
PLAN -TEES
18" MIN. F­24" MIN.,
10" DIA. I 12 "0 & UP
& LESS
° 0
V °
C =PLAN
D= ELEVATION
PLAN & ELEVATION
PLUGS
PIPE
90' BEND
45' BEND
22 -1/2' BEND
11 -1/4' BEND
TEE
PLUG
SIZE
A
"B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
C
D
10"
28"
22"
15"
22"
12"
15"
12"
15'
20"
22"
31"
14"
16"
54"
38 "'30"
TRENCH BOX/ SHORING
36"
18"
36"
18"
36"
36"
42"
54"
24"
24"
96"
48"
52"
.48"
36"
36"
26"
26"
96"
48"
68"
38"
30"
108"
48"
X60"
48"
1 42"
42"
36"
36"
108"
48"
108"
48"
2000 PSF SOIL (SAND & GRAVEL WITH CLAY)
NOTES:
1. BASED ON 200 PSI STATIC PRESSURE PLUS AWWA WATER HAMMER ALLOWANCE.
2. ALL BEARING SURFACES TO BE CARRIED TO UNDISTURBED GROUND.
3. THRUST BLOCKS TO BE USED AT ALL LINES OPERATING UNDER PRESSURE.
4. KEEP ALL PIPING JOINTS CLEAR OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS.
WATER LINE-'
RESTRAINING
RODS
LIMITS OF CREEK CROSSING
45' M.J.
BEND, SEE CREEK CROSSING STABILIZATION
TYPICAL DETAILS ON SHEET GO.7
WATER LEVEL
CREEK BED
Z
EXISTING
I:.
I %';: WATER LINE - SEE
PLANS FOR SIZE, TYP.
CONCRETE GRAVITY BLOCKING -MIN.
5.25 CU. YDS. EACH SIDE, TYP.
SEE BLOCKING CROSS SECTION
CONCRETE ANTI -SEEP-
COLAR, TYPICAL
SEE DETAIL E/C4.23 7/8" DIAMETER
NOTES: RESTRAINING
ROD -2 REQ'D. :,....a.
1. ONLY FULL 18' OR 20' JOINTS OF PIPE SHALL BE USED ON (1 SHOWN)
EACH SIDE OF TOP BENDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED.
` .. x'
2. RESTRAINING RODS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL OR GALVANIZED
RODS WITH FIELD- APPLIED BITUMINOUS COATING. °
6 ". TYP
BLOCKING CROSS SECTION
HDPE FLANGE
(SEE DETAIL)
z
io
M
NOTES:
1. SEE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR HDPE PIPE SIZE AND PRESSURE RATING.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR HDPE PIPE TO REBOUND
AFTER PULLING PIPE THROUGH BORE.
DIRECTIONAL BORE
(SEE PLAN FOR LENGTH)
EXISTING
MIN.
FLANGE ADAPTER
DETAIL)
RESTRAINED JOINT RESTRAINED JOINT
FOR NEXT (5) JOINTS I/A BED FOR NEXT (5) JOINTS
RESTRAINED RETAINING GLA
HDPE PIPE WATER LINE
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
OR PVC PIPE
RESTRAINED JOINT
FOR NEXT (5) JOINTS
24" RESTRAINED DIP
WATER LINE
CONCRETE PLACED ON w NOTE:
UNDISTURBED SOIL AS ALL JOINTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED IF
DETERMINED BY ENGINEER. FITTINGS ARE USED TO DEFLECT UNDER
SECTION EXISTING UTILITIES.
r1'
POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE
(SIDES NEXT TO TRENCH NOT FORMED)
NOTE:
FORMS NOT REQUIRED BELOW SPRING LINE, CONCRETE MAY BE PLACED
AGAINST SHAPED BANKS IN LIEU OF FORMS.
5 CONCRETE ANTI -SEEP COLLAR
C423 NOT TO SCALE
SL020.dwg
6 ".REVISED PER NCDOT 8/6/14
5
fv)BELL
2/19/14
4 _
ADDED POSITIVE SHORING NOTE
2/11/14
3 "
-
2/5/14
2
STORM SEPARATION PER NCDENR PWS
10/16/12
x
M
REVISIONS PER NCDOT
10/16/12
REV. N0.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
South Carolina
co
- - --
63
155
YES
279
116
55
27
113
221
SHEETING, SHORING, AND BRACING MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION
Iy
5. PLATE WIDTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 6' -0 STEEL PLATES
TRENCH BOX/ SHORING
x
Do
-
GREATER THAN 6' -0" IN WIDTH WILL REQUIRE A SEALED
6 DESIGN SUBMITTED TO NCDOT'
4
STRUCTURES AND PROPERTY, INCLUDE .STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
TO SUPPORT PLAN. PREPARE
M
EXCAVATION PROTECTION PLAN
A36 STEEL PLATE
EXISTING SOIL
UNDER DIRECT SUPERVISION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
EXPERIENCED IN DESIGN OF THIS WORK AND LICENSED IN STATE OF
TRENCH WALL
3 - #4 BARS
NORTH CAROLINA. POSITIVE SHORING SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE TO
V
PLAN
LLI
DISTRICT ENGINEER'S OFFICE AND THE NCDOT UTILITIES UNIT.
"�»
STANDARD TRENCH BOX SHORING SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED AN
"
Q
TRENCH WALL
ACCEPTABLE PLAN WHERE EXCAVATIONS WITHIN NCDOT ARE
z
x
N
/PIT COVER
LL
`o-
PIPE O.D.
12 "MIN.
SEE NOTE
Z"
WATER LINE-'
RESTRAINING
RODS
LIMITS OF CREEK CROSSING
45' M.J.
BEND, SEE CREEK CROSSING STABILIZATION
TYPICAL DETAILS ON SHEET GO.7
WATER LEVEL
CREEK BED
Z
EXISTING
I:.
I %';: WATER LINE - SEE
PLANS FOR SIZE, TYP.
CONCRETE GRAVITY BLOCKING -MIN.
5.25 CU. YDS. EACH SIDE, TYP.
SEE BLOCKING CROSS SECTION
CONCRETE ANTI -SEEP-
COLAR, TYPICAL
SEE DETAIL E/C4.23 7/8" DIAMETER
NOTES: RESTRAINING
ROD -2 REQ'D. :,....a.
1. ONLY FULL 18' OR 20' JOINTS OF PIPE SHALL BE USED ON (1 SHOWN)
EACH SIDE OF TOP BENDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED.
` .. x'
2. RESTRAINING RODS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL OR GALVANIZED
RODS WITH FIELD- APPLIED BITUMINOUS COATING. °
6 ". TYP
BLOCKING CROSS SECTION
HDPE FLANGE
(SEE DETAIL)
z
io
M
NOTES:
1. SEE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR HDPE PIPE SIZE AND PRESSURE RATING.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR HDPE PIPE TO REBOUND
AFTER PULLING PIPE THROUGH BORE.
DIRECTIONAL BORE
(SEE PLAN FOR LENGTH)
EXISTING
MIN.
FLANGE ADAPTER
DETAIL)
RESTRAINED JOINT RESTRAINED JOINT
FOR NEXT (5) JOINTS I/A BED FOR NEXT (5) JOINTS
RESTRAINED RETAINING GLA
HDPE PIPE WATER LINE
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
OR PVC PIPE
RESTRAINED JOINT
FOR NEXT (5) JOINTS
24" RESTRAINED DIP
WATER LINE
CONCRETE PLACED ON w NOTE:
UNDISTURBED SOIL AS ALL JOINTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED IF
DETERMINED BY ENGINEER. FITTINGS ARE USED TO DEFLECT UNDER
SECTION EXISTING UTILITIES.
r1'
POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE
(SIDES NEXT TO TRENCH NOT FORMED)
NOTE:
FORMS NOT REQUIRED BELOW SPRING LINE, CONCRETE MAY BE PLACED
AGAINST SHAPED BANKS IN LIEU OF FORMS.
5 CONCRETE ANTI -SEEP COLLAR
C423 NOT TO SCALE
SL020.dwg
6 ".REVISED PER NCDOT 8/6/14
5
REVISED' DETAILS AND NOTES
2/19/14
4 _
ADDED POSITIVE SHORING NOTE
2/11/14
3 "
REVISED. STANDARD WATER. MAIN TRENCH DETAIL
2/5/14
2
STORM SEPARATION PER NCDENR PWS
10/16/12
i
REVISIONS PER NCDOT
10/16/12
REV. N0.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
REVISIONS
45' M.J. EXISTING
BEND,
TYPICAL
w
J
V) F
>w
11n
51 �51
TO SPRING LINE
EXISTING UTILITY
j VARIES, SEE TABLE
AND DESIGN DRAWINGS-1
EXISTING
PER PLAN DIMENSIONS
PAVEMENT - -
to Is
ax UTILITY NOTES:
a¢
w�
°fX
J�Zo 1. UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED
Y N BY WK DICKSON & CO., INC.
o
w
M ° ° z 2. THE ENGINEER HAS MADE ALL POSSIBLE ATTEMPTS TO LOCATE
\ EXISTING UTILITIES. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO
FIELD - VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO
NOTES: "���i� % / /�� / / \� %j /�� / /�� // VAS CONSTRUCTION AND TO NOTE ANY CONFLICTS. ANY DAMAGE TO
UTILITIES INCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY
1. BACKFILL TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY WHERE EXCAVATIONS CUT J OF THE CONTRACTOR AND IS TO BE REPAIRED AT THE
THROUGH PAVEMENTS, CURBS, DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS, AND / \ / \/ \j CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. NC ONE CALL TELEPHONE NUMBER IS
UNDER OR ADJACENT TO STRUCTURES. j \j\ \ \j a� 1- 800 - 632 -4949.
/ r
2. STONE IS REQUIRED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS, s', \j\ / 8 8" \ \j Fm3 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING
BELOW PIPE WHEN ENCOUNTERING OR WET °F 41 /\ x / MINIMUM MINIMUM \/� � � a � UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO
CONDITIONS. STONE TO RANGE IN SIZE FROM 1/2" TO 1 -1/2 ". �O s� % m / - z aa° PREVENT DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
SEE NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWING 300.01 FOR �,a ZF, / \\ j\ `� °o o°�i ANY DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE
APPROVED PIPE BEDDING WITHIN NCDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY. F> �\ j\ / PIPE \mom 0Qa CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ANY UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS MAY REQUIRE
3. HAND CARVE BOTTOM AND SHAPE FOR LOWER QUADRANT OF PIPE. \ \ / / WaQ o0o ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENTS FROM NCDOT. COORDINATE ANY
EXCAVATE ADDITIONALLY FOR BELLS. /// / W g2Z UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS OR RELOCATIONS WITH NCDOT.
1n° z�
4. INVERT OF PROPOSED TRENCH LINE SHALL BE AT A MAXIMUM / \ / / \ \ / / \U ° ° g 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH OTHER UTILITY COMPANIES
1:1 SLOPE AS PROJECTED FROM EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. % / \ /// \// W J TO PREVENT CONFLICTS (I.E. PIPE CROSSINGS) AS WELL AS ANY
NECESSARY RELOCATIONS OR TEMPORARY BRACING OF UTILITY
5 MINIMUM 36
AUMINIMUMOOFR36" BELOW ELEVATIONEOFAEDGEQOF ED �° 5 ADJUSTED WHEN
FIELD. CIONTAQMENGNEERSIMMEDIATELY IOF SUCH A
\ \ w
/V / /V / /V //V / /.v /. ✓ /, ✓ /.� / /,v / /.v�
EXISTING PAVEMENT. /( OM NOTE CASE ARISES.
6. STOCKPILE EXCAVATED MATERIAL UPGRADIENT OF THE TRENCH 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ANY UTILITY REMOVALS AND
WHEREVER POSSIBLE. RELOCATIONS WITH TOWN OF BOONE OR APPROPRIATE UTILITY
7. ROAD SCREENINGS SHALL BE PLACED ON PAVED SURFACES IF COMPANY.
EXCAVATED MATERIAL IS PLACED ON ROADWAYS. CLEAN UP OF 6. MINIMUM COVER OVER ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE 3' -0 ".
ROADWAY MUST OCCUR IMMEDIATELY AFTER PIPE INSTALLATION.
8. WHEN DEWATERING OF TRENCH IS REQUIRED, DISCHARGE SHALL BE 7. MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCES BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER
PUMPED THROUGH A SILT SACK CAPABLE OF FILTERING 8 OZ. /SQ YD ® 80 GPM LINES:
9. AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECTED 1:1 SLOPE FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND 7.1. WATER OVER SANITARY SEWER - 18" VERTICAL OR 10'
NOT UNDER PAVEMENT SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH FLOWABLE FILL. SEE PAVEMENT HORIZONTAL
REPLACEMENT DETAILS OF SHEET C4.24 FOR AREAS UNDER PAVEMENT. ]VdiERE 7.2. STORM SEWER - 18" VERTICAL
10, TRENCH BOXES REQUIRED FOR ALL TRENCH WALLS INSTALLED AT 1:1 AND STEEPER.
11. STOCK PILES SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY DO NOT INTERFERE WITH ROADWAY SIGH 8. PAVEMENT PATCHING AND RESURFACING MUST BE COMPLETED
12. POSITIVE SHORING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECTED 1:1 SLOP WITHIN 5 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF TRENCHING ACTIVITIES.
TRAFFIC IS MAINTAINED. SEE DETAIL 1/C4.28. SMALL PATCH AREAS CAN B MAINTAINED WITH TEMPORARY
3 PAVEMENT PATCHING OR CABC STONE UNTIL PERMANENT PATCHING
13. ALL TRENCH EXCAVATION INSIDE THE LIMITS OF THE THEORETICAL 1:1 SLOPE, AS DEFINED B IS COMPLETE. CABC SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES TO THE
SHALL BE COMPLETELY AND COMPACTED AT THE END OF EACH CONSTRUCTION DAY. NO POR 6 ELEVATION OF THE ADJACENT PAVEMENT.
THE TRENCH MAY BE LEFT OPEN OVERNIGHT.
9. ALL TAP FEES FOR WATER, SEWER, GAS, ELECTRICAL, ETC. SHALL
BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR.
3 STANDARD WATER MAIN TRENCH 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE UTILITIES
NOT To SCALE - GAS LINES AND METERS, ELECTRIC LINES AND METERS, CABLE
14.23 TELEVISION, ETC. WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY.
HOPE TO DIP FLANGE ADAPTER
DUCTILE IRON GLAND RING
HDPE PIPE
S.S. REINFORCED SUPPORT RING
FLANGE ADAPTER DETAIL
A _z
RESTRAINED JOINT 2
FOR NEXT (5) JOINTS �p
24" RESTRAINED DIP
WATER
ONE FULL JOINT OF 24"
DIP CENTERED AT POINT OF CROSSING
EXISTING UTILTIY PIPE
EXISTING UTILITY PIPE
fLOWABLE FILL
SEE NCDOT MATERIAL
SPECIFICATION 1000 -6
PROPOSED WATER LINE - ONE
FULL SECTION OF PIPE CENTERED
AT POINT OF CROSSING
Al
A2
PROJECT MANAGER DRAVANG SCALE
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
RELEASED FOR
DATE
RWH AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
TEE
DEAD
APPROVALS
- - --
JKI SEPT. 2014
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER
NC LICENSE N0. F -0374
r �ICKSON
BIDDING
(ORIZ)
BLT 80376.00.H1
FILE NAME
Office Locations:
community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
CONSTRUCTION
- - --
80376 -BOONE RAW WL_DETAILS.DWG
South Carolina
RECORD DWG.
- - --
T o
4
+
0
N
w
°
w
°
0
o
NOM. SIZE
POLY
90' BEND
I 45' BEND
122-1/2* BEND
11-1/4* BEND
TEE
DEAD
6
WRAPPED
(HORIZ)
(HORIZ)
(ORIZ)
(ORIZ)
REGISTERED ENGINEER. NCDOT REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTAL MAY BE
END
24"
NO
220
91
44
22
115
155
YES
279
116
55
27
113
221
7
C4.23
OUTSIDE DIMENSION 'X' + 4'
0
� X
a
zz
° I
z
wa.
0
w
°o
v1 =
? N
�y
0
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
OUTSIDE DIMENSION 'X' + 4
- INSIDE DIMENSION 'X'
11. FENCE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT: AREAS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS REQUIRING FENCE REMOVAL SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE
CONTRACTOR ONLY TO THE EXTENT REQUIRED FOR SAFE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE WATER LINE. THE FENCE SHALL BE
CAREFULLY REMOVED AND SAFELY STORED FOR REPLACEMENT
AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS :COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPER' REALIGNMENT OF THE RESTORED FENCE
THE ABOVE TABLE USES THE FOLLOWING PARAMETERS: LINE. ANY MISALIGNMENT OR DAMAGE TO THE'RESTORED` FENCE
PIPE MATERIAL: DIP PRESSURE. 200 SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE
SAFETY FACTOR: 1.5 to 1.0 DEPTH OF BURY: 3' CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO NOTE ANY DAMAGE TO
SOIL TYPE: CLAY 1 TRENCH TYPE: TYPE 2 THE FENCE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITH ADEQUATE
NOTE: ALL RESTRAINT LENGTHS (FT) REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF FITTING PHOTOGRAPHS OR OTHER EVIDENCE AND SHALL IDENTIFY THE SAME
TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION A LICENSED NC
0
STEEL COVER
13/32" /TYP.
L --
2' -0 "MAX. 1' -0" TYP.
NOT TO SCALE
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR MUST PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT
IP ALL REMOVED OR ALTERED CONTROLLED ACCESS FENCING HAS
A BEEN PROPERLY RESET, THE ENCROACHING PARTY MUST PROVIDE
THIS VE IFICATION T TH NC 0 .
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER, TEMPORARY PROTECTION IN
AREAS WHERE GUARDRAIL IS DISTURBED.
�- 1" DIAMETER X 12" LONG STEEL ROD/ SPIKE FOR SLIDE PREVENTION
'
ACCORDANCE WITH THE ENCROACHMENT CRITERIA
W
1,.
CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL NCDOT SIGNALS AND
CHECKLIST - POSITIVE SHORING NCDOT CONTROL OF ACCESS
Q <
6
APPURTENANCES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT THE TRAFFIC
FACILITIES. PLAN SHALL BE SEALED BY NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL NOTES:
//G\
\
SERVICES UNIT AT 336 -.903. - 9166.
REGISTERED ENGINEER. NCDOT REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTAL MAY BE
1. STEEL COVERS ARE FOR TEMPORARY USE TO SUPPORT
TRAFFIC DURING PHASE CONSTRUCTION.
14.
NCDOT DISTRICT OFFICE APPROVAL SHALL. BE REQUIRED FOR ANY
6 -12 WEEKS DEPENDING ON THE COMPLETENESS OF THE
2. STEEL CHANNELS NOT REQUIRED IN NON - TRAFFIC
SUBMITTAL OR MORE IF THE GENERAL METHOD IS NOT ACCEPTED.
AREAS.
U
3. PLATE SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER OPEN TRENCH /PIT AT
THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.
15.
EXCAVATION PROTECTION PLAN: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE
NCDOT AND ANY ASSOCIATED DELAYS OR DELINQUENCIES
4. WELDS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY AWS
".
SHEETING, SHORING, AND BRACING MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION
Iy
5. PLATE WIDTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 6' -0 STEEL PLATES
TRENCH BOX/ SHORING
REQUIRED TO PROTECT EXCAVATIONS, ROADWAYS AND ADJACENT
-
GREATER THAN 6' -0" IN WIDTH WILL REQUIRE A SEALED
6 DESIGN SUBMITTED TO NCDOT'
4
STRUCTURES AND PROPERTY, INCLUDE .STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
TO SUPPORT PLAN. PREPARE
EXCAVATION PROTECTION PLAN
A36 STEEL PLATE
EXISTING SOIL
UNDER DIRECT SUPERVISION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
EXPERIENCED IN DESIGN OF THIS WORK AND LICENSED IN STATE OF
z
0
1»
NORTH CAROLINA. POSITIVE SHORING SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE TO
V
W
LLI
DISTRICT ENGINEER'S OFFICE AND THE NCDOT UTILITIES UNIT.
"�»
STANDARD TRENCH BOX SHORING SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED AN
"
Q
ACCEPTABLE PLAN WHERE EXCAVATIONS WITHIN NCDOT ARE
z
GREATER THAN 10 FEET IN DEPTH AND ALSO ARE WITHIN THE
Li-
THEORETICAL 1:1 SLOPE., CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR PREPARING ENGINEERED` EXCAVATION AND POSITIVE SHORING 0
PLAN INCLUDING GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS IN W
I+-
I
P -0" MAX.
ACCORDANCE WITH THE ENCROACHMENT CRITERIA
W
CHECKLIST - POSITIVE SHORING NCDOT CONTROL OF ACCESS
Q <
SECTION VIEW
OF STEEL TOP PLATE
FACILITIES. PLAN SHALL BE SEALED BY NORTH CAROLINA
NOT ro SCALE
REGISTERED ENGINEER. NCDOT REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTAL MAY BE
J
6 -12 WEEKS DEPENDING ON THE COMPLETENESS OF THE
LL)
SUBMITTAL OR MORE IF THE GENERAL METHOD IS NOT ACCEPTED.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ACQUIRING APPROVAL FROM
NCDOT AND ANY ASSOCIATED DELAYS OR DELINQUENCIES
O
TRENCH BOX/ SHORING
-
z
Al
16. DISTURBED DRIVEWAY CULVERTS SHALL BE REPLACED USING NEW,
N
Z
EXISTING SOIL
(n
W
LLI
0
�1
Q
z
)RARY TRENCH
/PIT COVER
LL
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
24" RAW WATER LINE
DETAILS

_N Q
�YC'r
03o 6
D
w
ZZ
080
€ W
o -�
1g,z
Mew
off°
0
o °
FI_N
O¢F
wzo
III 9 N
X01
w
WW06w w0
1,2 Z J
2DOW
0 QwM
i At w
xz o
`-'wo?
" 06z
UG0!
F_ 1 SIDE VIEW
C
CARRIER PIPE
e•
LEGS ROTATED OUT OF POSITION FOR CLARITY
END VIEW
CARRIER PIPE
DITCH
(5'
-
2
10/30/14
4
NOMINAL DIA.
0. D.
-
3
2/1 //14
1.5'
3'
1.
Nn
REVISED PER NCOOT
C
6"
6.90"
DATE
°
STONE ROADWAY
6" STONE
ON SUBGRADE
1 1/4"
STONE DRIVEWAY
4" STONE
ON SUBGRADE
5/8"
8" '
9.05"
ALL BACKFILL OUTSIDE THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE BUT LOCATED IN THE RIGHT
16 142"
OF WAY IS TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (ASTM
N
2 1/4"
8.
THE LACK OF PROPER COMPACTION EQUIPMENT OR THE USE OF IMPROPER
1"
12"
13.20"
t
Q
ONE LANE OF TRAFFIC MUST BE OPEN AT ALL TIMES UNLESS OTHERWISE
4
3"
BASE COURSE
3
1/4"
16"
17.40"
PRIME
28 1/2"
2
3 1/2"
1
U?
24"
25.80"
ENTIRE TRAVEL LANE WIDTH
34 1/4"
TO
0
4"
C
CARRIER PIPE
e•
LEGS ROTATED OUT OF POSITION FOR CLARITY
END VIEW
CARRIER PIPE
DITCH
(5'
SPIDER
DIMENSIONS
10/30/14
4
NOMINAL DIA.
0. D.
3
A
2/1 //14
2
TOTAL SHEET NUMBER REVISED.
B
I
REVISED PER NCOOT
C
6"
6.90"
DATE
11"
STONE ROADWAY
6" STONE
ON SUBGRADE
1 1/4"
STONE DRIVEWAY
4" STONE
ON SUBGRADE
5/8"
8" '
9.05"
ALL BACKFILL OUTSIDE THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE BUT LOCATED IN THE RIGHT
16 142"
OF WAY IS TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (ASTM
563 +33
2 1/4"
8.
THE LACK OF PROPER COMPACTION EQUIPMENT OR THE USE OF IMPROPER
1"
12"
13.20"
t
22 1/2"
ONE LANE OF TRAFFIC MUST BE OPEN AT ALL TIMES UNLESS OTHERWISE
12"
3"
BASE COURSE
1
1/4"
16"
17.40"
PRIME
28 1/2"
COMPACTED
3 1/2"
1
1/2"
24"
25.80"
ENTIRE TRAVEL LANE WIDTH
34 1/4"
TO
EDGE OF DISTANCE VARIES
4"
2"
30"
32.00"
46 1/4"
4"
2"
PIPE
SUPPORT ASSEMBLY MARK NUMBER
NOMINAL DIA.
1
2
3
4
6"
8" x 2" x 1/4" PL
6" x 1 1/2"
x 7 4 "PL
6" x 7 /4 "PL
3/8-
NUT & BOLT
8 "..
8" x 3" x 1/4" PL
6" x 3 1/4"
x 1 4 "PL
6" x 1 4 "PL
1/2-
NUT & BOLT
12"
8" x 4" x -1 4" PL
6" x 3 5/8" x 3 8 "PL
6" x 3 8 "PL
1
2"
NUT & BOLT
16"
8" x 4" x 3/8" PL
6" x 4 3/4"
x 3 8 "PL
6" x 3 8 "PL
1/2"
NUT & BOLT
24"
8" x 4" x 3/8" PL
6" x 5 1/2"
x 3 8 "PL
6" x 3 8 "PL
1/2"
NUT & BOLT
30"
8" x 4" x 3/8" PL
6" x 5 1/2"
x 3 8 "PL
6" x 3 8 "PL
1 1/2"
NUT & BOLT
NOTES:
1. - SEE SPEC 33 05 23 FOR REQUIRED CASING DIAMETER AND MINIMUM
THICKNESS.
2. CARRIER PIPE IS RESTRAINED PUSH -ON JOINT DIP, PROVIDE TWO SPIDERS
PER JOINT OF CARRIER PIPE.
3. ; SPIDERS, NUTS, BOLTS & WASHERS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL.
4. ADJUST HEIGHT OF SPIDERS AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN SPECIFIED SLOPE.
5. CASING PIPE MATERIAL IS STEEL.
F4SEWER (UNDER)
10' -0,.
WATER (OVER)
WATER SEWER
aI1= 1IIInTIII oz_
WATER -�o I I 117
I I -I I II
s SEE I I ITI1
NOTE WATER
I
SEWER 10' -0" SEWER
-f1=1 11= = I 1 =1 11-
_LI
-1 I-
IIII 111_ Viz_ LI
f N _ SEE NOTE SEWER
WATER III _I
D.I. WATER
SEWER
NOTE:
WHEN WATER MAIN IS ABOVE SEWER, BUT WITH LESS THAN 18" CLEARANCE, OR WHEN THE SEWER
IS ABOVE THE WATER MAIN, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND THE SEWER LINE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
OF FERROUS MATERIALS WITH JOINTS EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A MINIMUM
LATERAL DISTANCE, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SEWER, OF 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE
OF THE CROSSING.
0 2 RELATION OF WATER MAINS
04.24 TO SEWER MAINS
NOT TO SCALE
CASING PIPE
CARRIER PIPI
SHOULDER
5' BEYOND
TOE OF SLOPE ---\
N -' 3' -0" MIN
I!E l
END WALL
[7V�T.�Ii�CiIC7.�I
PAVEMENT
r- SHOULDER
DITCH
(5'
5
ADDED WATER TO STORM SEWER DETAIL PER NCDOT
10/30/14
4
REVISED PER NCOOT
8/6/14
3
REVISED RELATION OF WATER MAIN TO SEWER MAIN DETAIL
2/1 //14
2
TOTAL SHEET NUMBER REVISED.
2/5/14
I
REVISED PER NCOOT
10/16/12
REV. N0.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
RFVISIONS
CASING PIPE
CARRIER PIPI
SHOULDER
5' BEYOND
TOE OF SLOPE ---\
N -' 3' -0" MIN
I!E l
END WALL
[7V�T.�Ii�CiIC7.�I
PAVEMENT
r- SHOULDER
- - - - - -SLOPE
STEEL PIPE CASING 8"
1/2 CU. YD. GRAVEL
FOR DRAINAGE
TYPICAL PIPE CROSSING UNDER HIGHWAYS
WEEP HOLES � \ I
SEE NOTE 2 - COMMON BRICK MORTAR:
END WALL SECTION 1 PART PORTLAND CEMENT
2 PARTS SAND
D = DIAMETER OF CASING PIPE
NOTES:
1. SEE DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION, SIZE, LENGTH, AND SITE SPECIFIC DEPTH OF STEEL PIPE CASINGS.
2. INSTALL TWO(2) 1" DRAINS EACH SIDE OF CARRIER PIPE IN DOWNHILL END WALL.
A5
I I I =T =I 11 =1 11 =1 I I -I i 1 =I 11 =1 I
Z 0?
&f STORM SEWER
WATER MAIN *SEE DETAIL
6/C4.23
STORM SEWER WATER MAIN -
NOTE:
WHEN A WATER MAIN CROSSES OVER OR UNDER A STORM SEWER AND CONDITIONS
PREVENT THE REQUIRED 18" MIN VERTICAL SEPARATION, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE HAND
EXCAVATED. IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE NCDOT OR THE ENGINEER, THE WATER MAIN
WILL BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE FOR A DISTANCE OF 10' BEYOND THE EXTERIOR FACES OF
THE WALLS OF THE STORM SEWER.
5
04.24
DITCH
(5'
BEYOND TOE
OF
SLOPE)
- - - - - -SLOPE
STEEL PIPE CASING 8"
1/2 CU. YD. GRAVEL
FOR DRAINAGE
TYPICAL PIPE CROSSING UNDER HIGHWAYS
WEEP HOLES � \ I
SEE NOTE 2 - COMMON BRICK MORTAR:
END WALL SECTION 1 PART PORTLAND CEMENT
2 PARTS SAND
D = DIAMETER OF CASING PIPE
NOTES:
1. SEE DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION, SIZE, LENGTH, AND SITE SPECIFIC DEPTH OF STEEL PIPE CASINGS.
2. INSTALL TWO(2) 1" DRAINS EACH SIDE OF CARRIER PIPE IN DOWNHILL END WALL.
A5
I I I =T =I 11 =1 11 =1 I I -I i 1 =I 11 =1 I
Z 0?
&f STORM SEWER
WATER MAIN *SEE DETAIL
6/C4.23
STORM SEWER WATER MAIN -
NOTE:
WHEN A WATER MAIN CROSSES OVER OR UNDER A STORM SEWER AND CONDITIONS
PREVENT THE REQUIRED 18" MIN VERTICAL SEPARATION, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE HAND
EXCAVATED. IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE NCDOT OR THE ENGINEER, THE WATER MAIN
WILL BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE FOR A DISTANCE OF 10' BEYOND THE EXTERIOR FACES OF
THE WALLS OF THE STORM SEWER.
5
04.24
STREET -WIDTH
TOTAL
WIDTH OF PAVEMENT
_MINIMUM
CABC -BASE SURFACE
H HB 1 -1 1 -2
ASPHALT ROADWAY
TO BE
REMOVED & REPLACED
6
2
-
ASPHALT DRIVEWAY
4
0
giTUMINOUS
1 -
z
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
6" CONCRETE
ON SUBGRADE
FOR ROAD CROSSINGS THE ENTIRE AREA SHALL BE MILLED 1.5" STARTING AT 15'
SURFACE
4" CONCRETE
ON SUBGRADE
5.
STONE ROADWAY
6" STONE
ON SUBGRADE
SURFACE COURSE.
STONE DRIVEWAY
4" STONE
ON SUBGRADE
1175
LIFTS NOT TO EXCEED 6"
7.
ALL BACKFILL OUTSIDE THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE BUT LOCATED IN THE RIGHT
0wo0000 "0O0O o "OpO00000 "0010 O °O °O0 "0p0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
... ......... .. .........F
OF WAY IS TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (ASTM
563 +33
T
8.
THE LACK OF PROPER COMPACTION EQUIPMENT OR THE USE OF IMPROPER
579+15
CRUSHED AGGREGATE
241
t
12"
ONE LANE OF TRAFFIC MUST BE OPEN AT ALL TIMES UNLESS OTHERWISE
12"
APPROVED BY NCDOT
BASE COURSE
PAVEMENT SHALL BE RESTORED WITHIN TWO WEEKS.
(MIN.)
(MIN.)
4 FOR
PRIME
- C4,24
COMPACTED
COAT
SUB -BASE
STREET -WIDTH
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
REPLACE
_MINIMUM
CABC -BASE SURFACE
H HB 1 -1 1 -2
ASPHALT ROADWAY
-
01
6
2
-
ASPHALT DRIVEWAY
4
0
1 0
1 -
1 1 1/2"
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
6" CONCRETE
ON SUBGRADE
FOR ROAD CROSSINGS THE ENTIRE AREA SHALL BE MILLED 1.5" STARTING AT 15'
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
4" CONCRETE
ON SUBGRADE
5.
STONE ROADWAY
6" STONE
ON SUBGRADE
SURFACE COURSE.
STONE DRIVEWAY
4" STONE
ON SUBGRADE
1175
NOTES:
1. ALL BACKFILL LOCATED WITHIN THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE IS
TO BE PLACED IN LIFTS NOT TO EXCEED 6" AND COMPACTED
TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (ASTM D698).
2. ALL BACKFILL OUTSIDE THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE BUT
LOCATED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS TO BE COMPACTED TO
95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (ASTM D698).
3. THE LACK OF PROPER COMPACTION EQUIPMENT OR THE USE
OF IMPROPER COMPACTION METHODS SHALL BE CAUSE FOR
THE IMMEDIATE SHUTDOWN OF THE WORK BY THE ENGINEER.
DATE
15' -0"
EXIST. PAVEMENT
EXIST. BINDER
EXIST. STONE
oQ '00, ° 11" 825.OB BASE
°°
c
12 „ o t (100% COMPACTION) 1
(MIN.) °Soo° (M
00 0 logo 0
° o 0
00o00°
D
" o o ° '. "
000 p0 o 8
_ ° 00
00
00 O D_
,00 ° poop°
Oo 0 0 0
Al
2.0" OVERLAY (SF9.5A)
15' EACH WAY FROM EDGE OF FINAL
PAVEMENT CUT.
2" TYPE 12
i 15' -0"
0
FILL W/ #57 OR #67
CABC STONE (COMPACTED)
TAMP (EACH LAYER)
COMP. 6" LAYER
PROJECT MANAGER
RWH
DRAWING SCALE
AS SHOWN
401 4th STREET SW, SUITE 201
HICKORY, NC 28602
(828) 327 -6911
NC LICENSE NO. F -0374
W DICKSON Office Locations:
community Infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
South Carolina
RELEASED FOR
APPROVALS
DRAWN BY
JKI
PROJECT DATE
SEPT. 2014
BIDDING
APPROVED BY
BLT
PROJECT NUMBER
80376.00.H1
CONSTRUCTION
FILE NAME
80376 -BOONE RAW
WL -DETAILS.DWG
RECORD DWG.
DATE
15' -0"
EXIST. PAVEMENT
EXIST. BINDER
EXIST. STONE
oQ '00, ° 11" 825.OB BASE
°°
c
12 „ o t (100% COMPACTION) 1
(MIN.) °Soo° (M
00 0 logo 0
° o 0
00o00°
D
" o o ° '. "
000 p0 o 8
_ ° 00
00
00 O D_
,00 ° poop°
Oo 0 0 0
Al
2.0" OVERLAY (SF9.5A)
15' EACH WAY FROM EDGE OF FINAL
PAVEMENT CUT.
2" TYPE 12
i 15' -0"
0
FILL W/ #57 OR #67
CABC STONE (COMPACTED)
TAMP (EACH LAYER)
COMP. 6" LAYER
*q�,ann*9apM
?"rt'j1 CA/R
0 ®®
e Q 9t
°•e a b
GINSEQ°�Q
cGS °0saa�ax� sae ° °Il jjf/
11" B25.OB BASE
TOP 8"
007. COMPACTION) 12'
1�
OR OS, 0000°
- (MIN.
op° D opo D
° ° °
o °o°o 0
0 ° 0000
00 0
O-
o O °
00
°-
R'
EXIST. BINDER
oqo °-�- EXIST. STONE
FILL W/ #57 OR #67
CABC STONE (COMPACTED)
TAMP (EACH LAYER)
COMP. 6" LAYER
24" DIP WATER LINE
BROWNWOOD ROAD SR 1359)
NOTES: NOT TO SCALE
SILT FENCING
SEE DETAIL
2 /GO.6
POSSIBLE SOIL
STOCK PILE
LOCATIONS.
SEE DETAIL
8/C4.24
CASING PIPE
CARRIER PIPE
I/- PAVEMENT
BORE PIT.—/
SEE PLANS
FOR SIZE.
NOTES:
1. STOCK PILE LOCATIONS WILL VARY BASED ON FIELD
CONDITIONS. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AROUND STOCK PILE
TO PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF.
2. STOCK PILES SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY DO NOT
INTERFERE WITH ROADWAY SIGHT DISTANCES.
BORE PIT SOIL STOCK PILE LOCATIOP
C424 NOT TO SCALE
* SILT FENCE
3 TYP.)
3 / /OP/ \ 1
* SILT FENCE 5' MIN. 1�J �jSSOC /PILE�IS 5' MIN.
EXISTING GRARR J7
8
- 5.24
DISTANCE VARIES
TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT'
EXIST. PAVEMENT
EXIST. BINDER
EXIST. STONE °
°o °
n
Boone Raw Water Line
24" DIP WATER LINE-`
NOTES:
1.
PAVEMENTS SHALL BE CUT FULL DEPTH AND REMOVED.
2.
AFTER TRENCH WORK IS COMPLETE, EDGES OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT ALONG
SIDE OF THE TRENCH; OR
THE TRENCH SHALL BE RECUT A MINIMUM OF 1' WIDER ON EACH SIDE OF THE
461 +56
TRENCH; OR IF THE PAVEMENT IS UNDERMINED, TO 1 FOOT BEYOND THE
12"
UNDERMINED PORTION AND REMOVE THE PAVEMENT.
3.
BASE COURSE SHALL BE B25.OB ASPHALT CONCRETE ACCOMPLISHED IN 2 LIFTS
216
MINIMUM.
4.
FOR ROAD CROSSINGS THE ENTIRE AREA SHALL BE MILLED 1.5" STARTING AT 15'
782
BACK FROM THE EDGE OF THE FINAL PAVEMENT CUT.
5.
THE ENTIRE AREA SHALL BE OVERLAYEO WITH 2.0" SF9.5A ASPHALT CONCRETE
271
SURFACE COURSE.
6.
ALL BACKFILL LOCATED WITHIN THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE IS TO BE PLACED IN
1175
LIFTS NOT TO EXCEED 6"
7.
ALL BACKFILL OUTSIDE THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE BUT LOCATED IN THE RIGHT
1318
OF WAY IS TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (ASTM
563 +33
D698).
8.
THE LACK OF PROPER COMPACTION EQUIPMENT OR THE USE OF IMPROPER
579+15
COMPACTION METHODS SHALL BE CAUSE FOR THE IMMEDIATE SHUTDOWN OF THE
241
WORK BY THE ENGINEER.
9.
ONE LANE OF TRAFFIC MUST BE OPEN AT ALL TIMES UNLESS OTHERWISE
APPROVED BY NCDOT
10.
PAVEMENT SHALL BE RESTORED WITHIN TWO WEEKS.
TYPICAL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT
4 FOR
PERPENDICULAR UTILITY CUT ON NCDOT RC
- C4,24
NOT TO SCALE
MILL EXISTING PAVEMENT
1.5" OVERLAY (SF9.5A)
(PER NCDOT STANDARDS)
ENTIRE TRAVEL LANE WIDTH
DISTANCE VARIES SEE TABLE BELOW
TO
EDGE OF DISTANCE VARIES
PAVEMENT I TO ROAD CENTER LINE
r -1
*q�,ann*9apM
?"rt'j1 CA/R
0 ®®
e Q 9t
°•e a b
GINSEQ°�Q
cGS °0saa�ax� sae ° °Il jjf/
11" B25.OB BASE
TOP 8"
007. COMPACTION) 12'
1�
OR OS, 0000°
- (MIN.
op° D opo D
° ° °
o °o°o 0
0 ° 0000
00 0
O-
o O °
00
°-
R'
EXIST. BINDER
oqo °-�- EXIST. STONE
FILL W/ #57 OR #67
CABC STONE (COMPACTED)
TAMP (EACH LAYER)
COMP. 6" LAYER
24" DIP WATER LINE
BROWNWOOD ROAD SR 1359)
NOTES: NOT TO SCALE
SILT FENCING
SEE DETAIL
2 /GO.6
POSSIBLE SOIL
STOCK PILE
LOCATIONS.
SEE DETAIL
8/C4.24
CASING PIPE
CARRIER PIPE
I/- PAVEMENT
BORE PIT.—/
SEE PLANS
FOR SIZE.
NOTES:
1. STOCK PILE LOCATIONS WILL VARY BASED ON FIELD
CONDITIONS. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AROUND STOCK PILE
TO PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF.
2. STOCK PILES SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY DO NOT
INTERFERE WITH ROADWAY SIGHT DISTANCES.
BORE PIT SOIL STOCK PILE LOCATIOP
C424 NOT TO SCALE
* SILT FENCE
3 TYP.)
3 / /OP/ \ 1
* SILT FENCE 5' MIN. 1�J �jSSOC /PILE�IS 5' MIN.
EXISTING GRARR J7
8
- 5.24
DISTANCE VARIES
TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT'
EXIST. PAVEMENT
EXIST. BINDER
EXIST. STONE °
°o °
n
Boone Raw Water Line
Pavement Repair Required Along Brownwood Road (SR 1359)
Start
End
Length ft
Distance Between End
and Start Iftl
SIDE OF THE TRENCH; OR
438+00
461 +56
2356
12"
463 +72
487 +83
2411
216
495 +65
502+07
642
782
504+78
507+57
279
271
519 +32
521 +48
216
1175
534 +66
541+00
634
1318
546+00
563 +33
1733
Soo
565 +74
579+15
1341
241
* SEE DETAIL 2 /GO.6 FOR INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE
NOTES:
1. STOCK PILE HEIGHTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 35 FEET.
2. STOCK PILE SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER.
3. STOCK PILES SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY DO
NOT INTERFERE WITH ROADWAY SIGHT DISTANCES.
MAINTENANCE:
SEE DETAIL 2 /GO.6 FOR MAINTENANCE. NOTES ON SILT FENCES.
TYPICAL STOCK PILE DETAIL
AST TRIPLE SEAL WITH CRS2P OVERLAY
ENTIRE ROAD WIDTH
DISTANCE VARIES
TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT
24" DIP WATER LINE -
NEW RIVER HILLS (SR 151
NOT TO SCALE
1.
11" B25.OB BASE
o °o�
... .... °
o 0
�00
SHALL BE RECUT A MINIMUM OF 1' WIDER ON EACH
SIDE OF THE TRENCH; OR
TOP 8"
IF THE PAVEMENT IS UNDERMINED, TO 1 FOOT BEYOND THE UNDERMINED PORTION AND REMOVE THE PAVEMENT.
12"
(100% COMPACTION)'
12
(MIN.)
01N.)
4.
$0 00°
00 0 00 0
PLACING 1.5" OVERLAY (SF9.5A).
°o 0o po 00
ppo ° 00
ALL BACKFILL LOCATED WITHIN THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE IS TO BE PLACED IN LIFTS NOT
TO EXCEED 6"
°
8 " o o ° o o "
OO 0
CABC STONE (CO
S O (COMPACTED)
ALL BACKFILL OUTSIDE THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE BUT LOCATED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS
° p o n6 0.
TEST (ASTM D698).
7.
000C o OQ 00,
OF THE WORK BY THE
o
0 0 0 ° o S o$ °
O
TAMP (EACH LAYER)
0° o
I °Sa $
.COMP. 6" LAYER
DURING INSTALLATION, PROPER SIGNAGE WILL BE REQUIRED TO INDICATE AREAS OF BROKEN
p°o0
0
24" DIP WATER LINE -
NEW RIVER HILLS (SR 151
NOT TO SCALE
1.
PAVEMENTS SHALL BE CUT FULL DEPTH AND REMOVED.
2.
AFTER TRENCH WORK IS COMPLETE, EDGES OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT ALONG THE TRENCH
SHALL BE RECUT A MINIMUM OF 1' WIDER ON EACH
SIDE OF THE TRENCH; OR
IF THE PAVEMENT IS UNDERMINED, TO 1 FOOT BEYOND THE UNDERMINED PORTION AND REMOVE THE PAVEMENT.
3.
BASE COURSE SHALL BE B25.OB ASPHALT CONCRETE ACCOMPLISHED IN 2 LIFTS MINIMUM.
4.
ON BROWNWOOD ROAD (SR 1359), THE ENTIRE TRAVEL LANE SHALL BE MILLED 1.5" BEFORE
PLACING 1.5" OVERLAY (SF9.5A).
5.
ALL BACKFILL LOCATED WITHIN THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE IS TO BE PLACED IN LIFTS NOT
TO EXCEED 6"
6.
ALL BACKFILL OUTSIDE THE VEHICULAR LOAD ZONE BUT LOCATED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS
TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR
TEST (ASTM D698).
7.
THE LACK OF PROPER COMPACTION EQUIPMENT OR THE USE OF IMPROPER COMPACTION METHODS SHALL BE CAUSE FOR THE IMMEDIATE SHUTDOWN
OF THE WORK BY THE
ENGINEER.
8.
PAVEMENT SHALL BE RESTORED WITHIN FIVE DAYS.
9.
DURING INSTALLATION, PROPER SIGNAGE WILL BE REQUIRED TO INDICATE AREAS OF BROKEN
PAVEMENT.
6 TYPICAL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT FOR PARALLEL UTILITY CUT
- C4.24 4
USDA RAW WATER PROJECT
FOR THE
TOWN OF BOONE
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
24" RAW WATER LINE
DETAILS
r
2