20230397 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230313

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? *
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
1/9/2023
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20230397 1
Is a payment required for this project? *
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone] Chad Turlington:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Dunn Industrial Park
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Deborah Shirley
1b. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/13/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Mingo Swamp
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C;Sw
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.308186
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-78.576259
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
SRE Dunn Industrial, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB:3990, DP: 0489
2c. Contact Person:
J. Mathew Stephens
2d. Address
Street Address
319 Chapanoke Rd
Address Line 2
Ste 102
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zlp Code
27603-3433
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Michael Miller
3b. Business Name:
Flint Development
3c. Address
Street Address
3515 W 75th St
Address Line 2
Suite 103
City
Prairie Village
Postal / Zip Code
66206
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Deborah Shirley
4b. Business Name:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4c. Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address Line 2
Suite 104
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27615
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
KS
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
Of appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Dunn
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
1526-77-5334
2b. Property size:
139

2c. Project Address
Street Address
453 Rooms To Go Way
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Dunn NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28334 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Mingo Swamp
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C;Sw
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300060103
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The existing conditions of the project area consists of agricultural land with perimeter wooded areas. Specifically there are two perennial streams (A & B), four onsite wetlands (W1-W4), an
offsite wetland that runs parallel with Rooms To Go Way, a jurisdictional "open water' that also runs parallel to Rooms To Go Way, three jurisdictional ditches going through the agricultural
fields and wood line, and one non -jurisdictional agricultural ditch along the woods line. The general land use of the vicinity of the project consists primarily of agriculture and rural
residential, and some commercial.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 12.8 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Approximately 612 LF of perennial stream, 3745 LF of jurisdictional ditches, and 802 LF of open
water
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The project purpose is to construct an industrial park and necessary infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The overall project consists of the construction of an industrial development consisting of warehouse buildings, truck docks, trailer parking, parking, utilities, driveway and SCM's.
Specifically, there are two warehouse buildings with associated parking, trailer storage and loading areas. Water and sewer is to be provided to the site from the west along Rooms to Go
Way through an existing utility easement. There are also two wet ponds to treat post construction storm water runoff. Proposed impacts include one entrance driveway crossing (JD
ditch/open water), one offsite utility connection impacting wetlands, and two areas of JD ditch fill for the industrial buildings and parking. Equipment typically used for construction and
earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for this project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes
Comments:
No O Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2017-01863
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Kevin Murphrey
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USACE: Email verified on 12/7/2022 by Liz Hair (SAW-2017-01863)
`Please note that S&EC was tasked with delineating the offsite area post USACE Verification. An email with the updated delineation information was mailed to Liz Hair on 2/27/2023*
6. Future Project Plans

6a. Is this a phased project? *
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
It is possible that the trailer storage area may be converted into a third building. However, and future phases will be developed within the current limits of construction.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
O
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
O Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition *
(?)
29. Impact
area*
Impact 2
Water & Sewer
Conection (permanent-
no permanent loss)
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Offsite Wetland
Yes
Both
0.180
(acres)
impact 3
Buidling & Drive
P
Unknown
JD Ditch
Yes
Both
0.020
(acres)
Impact 3
Building, Drive and
parking
P
Unknown
JD Ditch
Yes
Both
0.100
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.300
2i. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.300
Total permanent loss wetland = 0.12 acres; Total permanent -no permanent loss wetland = 0.18 acres;
4. Open Water Impacts
4a. Site #
4a1. Impact Reason
4b. Impact type
4c. Name of waterbody
4d. Activity type
4e. Waterbody type
4f. Impact area
Impact 1
Driveway Crossing
P
JD Open Water
Culverts
Ditch
0.02
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.02
4h. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.02
1. Avoidance and Minimization
O

la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
S&EC completed a wetland delineation for the entire property, including an offsite area adjacent to Rooms To Go Way and southwest of the property
boundary, in order to identify natural resources so that impacts could be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. This project is
proposing the use of this property for warehouse and distribution. This type of use requires large buildings with truck docks as well as trailer parking. The
site location is ideal due to the proximity of Interstate 95. Impact 1 is a proposed Driveway crossing to a jurisdictional open water feature. Proposed
impacts include permanent (culvert & riprap) open water impacts. This driveway crossing is necessary to access the property from Rooms to Go Way.
Impacts have been minimized by shifting the crossing to the southwest to avoid perennial stream B and wetland W4. Impact 2 is a proposed water and
sewer utility crossing to a jurisdictional wetland. Proposed impacts include permanent -no permanent loss wetland impacts (i.e. open cut construction).
This utility crossing is necessary to connect to existing sanitary sewer and water lines located off property to the southwest. Wetland mitigation is
proposed at a 1:1 ratio to compensate for the wetland conversion within the permanent maintenance easement. Impacts 3 is proposed permanent loss
fill to a jurisdictional ditch. This fill is necessary to utilize the space on the property as necessary for a warehouse and distribution center. Building 2 size
has been reduced to minimize impacts, Building 2 rear loading and service area has been reduced (in the NW corner) to minimize impacts, and Building
2 location is optimal for direct connection via driveway to Rooms to Go Way. Impacts 4 is proposed permanent loss fill to a jurisdictional ditch. This fill is
necessary to utilize the space on the property as necessary for a warehouse and distribution center. Building 1 location has been shifted north to
minimize impacts, Retaining wall has been added to the west of building 1 to minimize impacts, Building 1 south loading and service area has been
reduced (in the SW corner) to avoid impacts to wetland W1 and Building 1 parking has been revised in a manner that is not optimal to shift the building.
It should also be noted that a reduction in building area anymore than already demonstrated would make the project financially unfeasible, and the
buildings and infrastructure have been designed in a manner to avoid impacts to the onsite jurisdictional wetlands and streams.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Erosion control measures such as sediment ponds, tree protection fencing, silt fencing and coffer dams shall be utilized during construction to minimize
impacts to wetlands, creeks, ditches and offsite properties.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
(linear feet)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.18
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h. Comments
S&EC reviewed the NCDWR Approved Mitigation Banks in NC list, there were no private mitigation banks listed within the 03030006 HUC. Wetland
mitigation proposed for Impact #2, the offsite utility corridor at a 1:1 ratio for the conversion of a forested wetland to a permanently maintained
herbaceous wetland. Compensatory mitigation not proposed for Impact #1-the open water ditch (mitigation not required for open water impacts) and for
Impacts 3 & 4-the jurisdictional ditches. Additional discussion regarding mitigation on attachment.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
This project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin which is not within a river basin with NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No

2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
State Stormwater Programs
Phase II Coastal Counties
HWQ or ORW Other
Comments:
Two wet detention basins will treat post construction runoff
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and
silvicultural operations. The Dunn Industrial Park project is a industrial development. Additionally, the project is located within the City of Dunn
jurisdiction, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the
Phase II NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in
addition to post -construction stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Discharge to City of Dunn Public Utilities.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? *
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? *
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No

5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), a
query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. A formal request was sent to the USFWS on
January 24, 2023. The USFWS has 30 days to respond from the date of the sent request. S&EC received no response from USFWS within the 30 days
which in their interpretation means that they concur with the determinations made by S&EC. The S&EC determinations were that the proposed project is
not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently
proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Please see attached S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential
Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on February 27, 2023, no historic listings or study list
entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no structures exist within the property boundaries.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
PCN Attachments_Dunn Industrial.pdf 18.4MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Deborah Shirley
Signature
Oetelote?..0 ,(rt'tl�r7
Date
3/13/2023

PCN Attachments
1. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
2. NCDWR PRE -FILING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3. USGS TOPO VICINITY MAP
4. NRCS COUNTY SOIL SURVEY VICINITY MAP
5. USACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD/AJD/CONCURRENCE
EMAIL)
6. S&EC SKETCH MAP
7. MITIGATION ACCEPTANCE LETTER
8. MITIGATION PHOTOS AND DISCUSSION
9. S&EC THREATENED & ENDANGERD SPECIES REPORT
10. EXISTING CONDITIONS & PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAPS
11.IMPACT EXHIBITS
12. POST -CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE AREA MAP

Project Name/Description:
Date: 12/21 /22
Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone; [phone]
sandec.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Dunn Industrial Park
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Liz Hair
Wilmington District
S&EC Project # 15365
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 1526-77-5334
Site Address: 453 Rooms To Go Wav
City, County, State: Dunn, Harnett County, NC
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: Michael R. Miller
Mailing Address: 3515 W 75th St Suite 103 Prairie Village, KS 66206
Telephone Number: 816-645-9812
Email: [e-mail]
Michael R. Miller
Applicant (please print)
Applicant Signature
12/21 /22
Date
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge,

Deborah Shirley
From: Deborah Shirley
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 3:28 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Turlington, Chad
Subject: DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request -Dunn Industrial Park
Attachments: Dunn Industrial Park Site Preliminary Site Layout with notes.pdf
401/Chad:
Please see the project details below and let me know if a DWR Pre -Filing Meeting is needed.
Contact: Deborah Shirley
Contact Email address: [e-mail]
Project Applicant: Flint Development; Michael Miller Michael @fli ntdevelopment.com
Project Name: Dunn Industrial Park
Project County: Harnett
Is this a Transportation Project: No
Types of Approvals Sought from DWR: 401 WQC- 4249 & 4263 (and possible 4276)
Types of Approvals Sought from USACE: NWP 18 & 39 (and possible NWP 58)
Does this project have an existing project ID#? No
Name of staff member you would like to request a meeting with, if necessary. Chad Turlington
Brief Description of the proposed project:
The proposed road project will be an industrial development in Dunn, Harnett County, NC. The project is approximately
136 acres. The project purpose is to construct an industrial park and necessary infrastructure. There are essentially four
proposed impact areas, one entrance road crossing (JD ditch/open water), two areas of JD ditch fill for the industrial
building and parking, and one area of JD ditch fill for and SCM. There is also possible offsite water and sewer connection
impacts, S&EC is going to delineation that offsite area 01/10/2023 and if any wetlands/streams are identified, they will
be incorporated into the proposed site plan. Please see Overall Site Plan for reference.
Thanks,
DEBORAH E. SHIRLEY
Project Manager -Regulatory Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office [phone]

Direct [phone]
Mobile [phone]
[e-mail]
Visit us at sandec.com
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify
the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.

C Offsite Area
Evaluation Area
e Village JoNE $
C�D MIXON RD
McL,ambs Pond
1
_L L
�m--
AL—u
�M11 190 Br dge �O0 \
Project Number: Map Title: N
15365.W1 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: Figure 1- USGS Map I i i i I i i i I
$B Harnett County, NC Feet
Scale:
1 if
= 1 000' ' Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Source: USGS Harnett County dx.W.s�e,oa.�m�xzs,,.w.�9�oo.F <9,9a46.9�
02/16/2023 NC Dunn Quad

r, Offsite Area
o Evaluation Area
NoE3 No
Ra
NoA
Bb R a'
B t
NoA
J i LB
NoB NoB
Pd
Ro
NoB
- NC Center or eogr phic In orma��ion A al i
Project Number: Map Title: N
15365.W1 0 500 1,000
Project Manager: Figure 2- Soil Survey Map I I I I I I I I
$B Harnett County, NC Feet
Scale:
1" = 500' •
Date: Source: Harnett County Soil & Environmental Consultants, P
0 2 / 16 /2 0 2 3 8412 Falls ofN.— Road, 6ui. 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phove: [phone] • Pas (919) 846-946
Soil Survey Sheet 13 ,.de —

Deborah Shirley
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 11:50 AM
To: Steven Ball
Cc: Kevin Murphrey
Subject: RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Updated Map POST USACE SITE VISIT_ 453 Rooms To
Go Way -JD Request_S&EC 15365
Hi Steven,
I enjoyed getting out in the field, I don't get to do it enough these days. To answer your questions: Yes, the road crossing
over the feature adjacent to Rooms to Go Way would be considered an open water impact. The feature labeled 'Ag/field
ditch' would not require authorization (yellow dashed line). The rest of the ditches are considered potentially JD, so they
would need to be included in impact calculations.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Thanks!
Liz
From: Steven Ball <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 11:07 AM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kevin Murphrey <[e-mail]>
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Updated Map POST USACE SITE VISIT_ 453 Rooms To Go Way_JD
Request_S&EC 15365
Hey Liz
Thanks for meeting Kevin on site yesterday. Please see the attached updated sketch map from the your site visit.
I have a couple of clarification questions for you on the ditch changes. For the Area along the frontage of Rooms to Go
way, will this "Jurisdictional Open Water" ditch require a permit as an open water impact?
Also, for the "Agricultural/Field Ditch", will this be considered "JD" as it is not labeled JD Ditch like the other
ditches? Just trying to see if that portion of the ditch will require a permit for impacts.
This site will be a large footprint type site plan, so there will be impacts to the ditches. That's why I am just trying to
make sure we take out any questions on the front end.
Let me know your when you get a second.
Thanks again!
SB
Steven Ball, RF, PWS
Project Manager
NC Registered Forester #1723
Professional Wetland Scientist #2732
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office 919-846-5900

Mobile [phone]
[e-mail]
Visit us at sandec.com
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify
the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.

{
g
Legend
l e
fW 4 '
k +
II �.
_ a• x - _ Yam. ��. * �s rt ��'
KM08 tt DitchF
KMO0
06 tt 67
F 2 End / TT Ditch
' W4
OL
_ . .
s CO
{{
X
A
B
106 End KM05 tt 61
f-
07 Start
01 Start �; I
40 70 tt PL
t
f
r i': • t ,
#+
r
r t
#ol
#�
5 '
5
i* M \ /
. * x 4
K
3 •
;0%
IL
0�
of
401,
G
qr
Ar
iAS�
4.
Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only
S&,EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork,
and any other additional information. Approximations were mapped using
topographic maps, air photos and ground truthing. If the site is going
to be disturbed, S&EC's detailed delineation should be approved and
permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required. If the user of
this work desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by
S&,EC, they should retain a NC Registered Professional Land Surveyor to
locate S&EC's flagging.
I Wetland Sketch Map
Project No. Scale:
15365.W1 1 =150'
Project Mgr.: 01/10/2023
SB
NO
453 Rooms to Go Way,
Dunn, NC
Prepared by: KM & MM
Offsite Evaluation Area
-t .x Evaluation Area
Jurisdictional Perennial Stream
Jurisdictional "Open Water"
+{_,# Y Jurisdictional Ditch
ih
Agricultural/Field Ditch
}'
= Jurisdictional Wetland
�P W3
2' Harnett County Contours
26 tt ditch ;
58ttPL �
KM01 tt CH
Pond/impoundment located
within wetland line.
103 tt JH70
JH01 tt PL
9%
VA
Per site visit with
Liz Hair of the USACE
on 12/7/2022.
Offsite area not verified.
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh. NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: (9 i 9) 84&9467
sandec."n,
tk
01 tt PL
JH36 tt PL
7
N
0 200 400 800
Feet

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Hunter Harris
Flint Development
3515 W 75th Street, Suite 103
Prairie Village, KS 66206
Project: Dunn Industrial Park
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 10, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 9/10/2023
County: Harnett
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030006
Riparian Wetland
0.18
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Dlrector
cc: Debbie E. Shirley, agent
ilg�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Janes Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 2 7699 -1652
oerartnic:r. nl cnr ionmcrlal r� �f 919,707,8976

Compensatory Mitigation Photos
Impact#1-Jurisdictional Open Water
Impact 1 is proposed open water impact for a driveway crossing. Traditionally open water impacts do
not require compensatory mitigation. Compensatory mitigation is not being proposed for this impact.

Compensatory Mitigation Photos
Impact #3-Jurisdictional Ditch
Impact 3 is proposed jurisdictional ditch fill for Building 2, loading dock and vehicle access. This
jurisdictional ditch was likely manually constructed or modified during previous agricultural operations.
Previous land use shows agricultural land wihtin the assessment area and the watershed draining to the
assessment area. The vegetation composition is severly altered and diversity is low. Compensatory
Mitigation is not proposed for this impact area.

Compensatory Mitigation Photos
Impact #4-Jurisdictional Ditch
Impact 4 is proposed jurisdictional ditch fill for Building 1, loading dock and parking. This jurisdictional
ditch was likely manually constructed or modified during previous agricultural operations. Previous land
use shows agricultural land wihtin the assessment area and the watershed draining to the assessment
area. The vegetation composition is severly altered and diversity is low. Compensatory Mitigation is not
proposed for this impact areadd.

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone; [phone]
sandec.com
January 16, 2022
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service S&EC Project No: 15365.W4
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Re: Online Project Review Request, Dunn Industrial Park, Dunn — Harnett County, North
Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We completed
our review January 16, 2022 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the
instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of. A planned industrial park development and offsite easement that is
proposing impacts ditches. Additionally, there are proposed wetland impacts in the offsite easement.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
Dunn Industrial Park (35.308340,-78.575998). The site is located at 453 Rooms To Go Way, Dunn
Harnett County, North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 15, 2026.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 39 & 58.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Enclosures:
1. Project Request Review Package 6. FWS Official Species List
2. S&EC T&E Species Report 7. NIP Report
3. Vicinity Maps 8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
4. S&EC Photo Report 9. FWS Self -Certification Letter
5. Overall Site Plan

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC: 27615 • Phone: [phone] •lax: [phone]
sandcc.com
January 16, 2023
S&EC Project No.: 15365.W4
To: Capital Civil Engineering
Attn: Michael McQuillen
PO Box 1006
Apex, NC 27502
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
Dunn Industrial Park (+/- 136 acres & Offsite Easement)
453 Rooms to Go Way, Dunn, Harnett County, NC
Dear Mr. McQuillen:
On January 10, 2022, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Dunn Industrial
Park shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located at 453 Rooms
To Go Way in Harnett County, NC. Surface waters on -site flow into Mingo Swamp in the Cape Fear
River Basin, which has been classified in the "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to
Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina" as C;Sw.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the
individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of
the streams, identifying forest types, and looking for evidence of the listed species on -site. This survey
did not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below.
Dunn Industrial Park - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 5

January 16, 2023
S&EC Project #15365.W4
RESULTS:
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Tricolored Bat (Perimyods subflavus), Proposed Endangered
• Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Endangered
• American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Threatened
• Yellow Lance (Elliptio lanceolata) , Threatened
• Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Candidate
• Rough -leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia), Endangered
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did not identify any Federally
threatened or endangered species within the project area or within one mile of the project area. Other
State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the attached NHP report. The NHP
report identified one managed areas within the project area or within one mile of the project area.
These are listed out in the attached NHP Report.
TRICOLORED BAT (Perimyotis subflavus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Tricolored Bat's
within the project area. During our survey, we found no individual species. Relying upon the findings
of the December 2021 Species Status Assessment (SSA) Report for the Tricolored Bat. S&EC did not
identify any culverts on -site or within adjacent ROW large enough to be considered roosting habitat.
These culverts were primarily full of water. This site is mostly open fields, with some wooded areas
along the streams and wetlands. Due to the nature of the project being industrial development, which
will include some tree removal, we concluded that the project would "May affect, but not likely to
adversely affect" TCB's.
RED -COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat (foraging and cavity trees) and
individual Red -cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) within the project area. We found no individual
RCWs within the project area. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within one mile of the site. We found no ideal suitable habitat (e.g., Long Leaf pine
Dunn Industrial Park - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 5

January 16, 2023
S&EC Project #15365.W4
forests) within the project area. Given the lack of species present, and no presence of suitable habitat
we concluded that the project would have "No effect" on RCWs.
AMERICAN ALLIGATOR (Alligator mississippiensis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat for the American Alligator. The
NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrences within the project area or within one mile of
the project area. No evidence of American Alligator was observed on -site. Suitable habitat for the
American Alligator consists of lakes, rivers, creeks, marshes, swamps, and ponds. Due to the presence
of streams and wetlands on -site, S&EC believes there is marginal habitat given all the open water
within the wetlands. However, there are only minor impacts associated with the utility easements, so
S&EC believes that the project would have "No effect' on the American Alligator.
MONARCH BUTTERFLY (Danaus plexippus):
The Monarch Butterfly is currently listed as a candidate species, and not yet listed or proposed for
listing as threatened or endangered. Due to the current status of Monarch Butterfly, consultation with
USFWS under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not required. FWS recommends conserving
pollinator habitat where practicable.
ROUGH -LEAVED LOOSESTRIFE (Lysimachia asperulaefolia):
S&EC personnel conducted a preliminary survey of the site for potential suitable habitat for the
Rough -Leaved Loosestrife. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
Project area or within one mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species is edges between
longleaf pine stands, and pond pocosins. This species can also be found alongside roads and
maintained easements. During our assessment we found no species of Rough -Leaved Loosestrife.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat exists on -site. There are disturbed
areas along the roads and easements, as well as field edges adjacent to wetlands. While we did not find
any Rough -Leaved Loosestrife plants within the project area, our survey was conducted outside of the
optimal survey window and as suitable habitat was found it is possible that Rough -Leaved Loosestrife
exists and therefore we concluded the project would "May affect" Rough -Leaved Loosestrife. We
Dunn Industrial Park - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 5

January 16, 2023
S&EC Project #15365.W4
recommend consulting with the USFWS and/or conducting follow up surveys within the optimal
survey window.
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests on -site or within one
mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is " Unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles ". We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT (Myotis septentrionalis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Northern Long-
eared Bats (NLEB's) within the project area. During our survey, we found no individual species.
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4 (d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities." Due to the nature of the project being industrial development, we
concluded that the project would "May affect, but not likely to adversely affect" NLEB's.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter". Using language typically used by the FWS
in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from the FWS. However, as suitable habitat
exists for Rough -Leaved Loosestrife the USFWS should be consulted to determine if surveys need to
occur during the optimal survey windows for Rough -Leaved Loosestrife to ensure that no plants exist
within the disturbed limits of the project. We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from
the FWS.
Dunn Industrial Park - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 5

January 16, 2023
S&EC Project #15365.W4
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. Official Species List. December 20, 2022.
7. NHP Report: December 20, 2022.
8. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. January 16, 2023.
9. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. January 16, 2023.
References:
-North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
-US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Second Revision. Atlanta GA 316 pp.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2021. Species Assessment (SSA) Report for the Tricolored Bat (Perimyods subflavus)
Version 1.1. Hadley, MA.
-U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. 2022 Recommended Minimum Culvert Dimensions for Bat Roost Surveys in Western
North Carolina. Ashville, NC.
Dunn Industrial Park — S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 5 of 5

ill
c8PA
f6
` Y,O
JOKE
MIXON RD
v
�oF' o
titi} 1! a
Zp0'
0--,'�,��, ,
�0r3.
:1,11
NC 55- •••
1 --� E Min go B r dge zoo l
.�
NC Center for ographic Information & Analysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
15365.W4 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: USGS MapI I I I I I I I I
MM Harnett County, NC Feet
Scale:
1" = 1000'
Date: Source: USGS Harnett County Soil Environmental Consultants, P
9512 F.1h oP \coat &a.d S.Rl 104. I.W& \C 2%L5 - Phac! (919) M&3MW- F.: (919)
01 /16/23 NC Dunn Quad
cL.ar Zbs Pond
1
A

oI
0 V -'1
JfIJ
Nos \
17 Ra
NoA
qf
9-
No]
Bb Ra'
B t
NoA
LB
NoB NoB Pd
Ro
_BbWEI
1
- C Cen�€r or €ogr phic Informa��ion A aly i
Project Number: Map Title: N
15365.W4 0 500 1,000
Project Manager: SOII Survey Map I I I I I I I I I
MM Harnett County, NC Feet
Scale:
1=500'
Date: Source: Harnett County Soil Environmental Consultants, P
Ri 13 F.1h of \coat &a.d S.Rl 104. H�1d& \C 27613 - Phac! (919) 84&3W- F.: (919)
1 /16/23 Soil Survey Sheet 13 �^

t
�11
�.. T
�.0
r=,: 'Photo 2
.*
S-
.A
r UP-4
Photo 3
�P40
40
' 1k ► +
F-
10,
II
a
t
_ * + -4
5�'
. , • - '�f
•;
t
0
t}
#
I Aerial Photo Map
0000000000000
+
� 0
M
A U
Project No. Scale:
15365.W4 1 =150'
Project Mgr.: 01/10/2023
MM
a
o--.
453 Rooms to Go Way,
Dunn, NC
Prepared by: KM & MM
q?.
.
J-�► }
.4
9%
Photo 7
Legend
�Offsite Evaluation Area
Z
of Evaluation Area
i
%�//%I-i-.
Jurisdictional Perennial Stream
Jurisdictional "Open Water"
o°°°000c000 Jurisdictional Ditch
Agricultural/Field Ditch
Jurisdictional Wetland
2' Harnett County Contours
h Z w
iii
soma. r
Photo 5
Photo 6
Per site visit with
Liz Hair of the USACE
on 12/7/2022.
Offsite area not verified.�
4PA it w
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh. NC 27615 + Phone: [phone] • Fax: (9 i 9) 84&9467
sandec."n,
N
0 200 400 800
Feet

�•\ ,: � 4.
r ! -�'S ,rya •,T� I�
. i
- 1; �•' S:l{ - Y d Fri `• i!•il _
jf' i•
�.to
_��:�_�; `` y�'z.,Tj :��- ,:y: - �d r' i s , I �.��1: '� ti,.:;f :yy.�5 � �;f�r fps • da•.
PC
,1'��'. 1 ; iris, ' S. l; ,• ,.. �� { � `.-.t�� . �.r: y::. � ' y ... �: �
'-'::•., S.}.'=fb�.'F. •'i i� - .r-�;: v'a',�_`.•'- ;.,`fry .d
. i __ ' •.�^'' .� F�t ..,� ILL'.:' - J - �;�'• ur��i
. 'i� � :�.r�'�t.y � •I�..-.��':e" �':I+"ac...:- �'�=t-• L � . �•\-�;�•'in �7tq. � P I �!'L� �
• r;;j,F U-:,�, r: y • . -per �'':- •;:�;-f�`�v,;�;� �� �,� ��. �. F,"�;T ' � �_. �}��.
'..� . yf': ;.,� :;�<• ` : a' - x•: ems., i' - . � , : i i' ;:�i;. �:,.. ��..e
- �. {j �hr d"�s i+'� �''�' .F� ,f.. 'u�'i ��I • '�}iII4�; `��5i'4� '[} I. , ��T. .�{!}•
- -y.. �it +'.-•fi'���'�. ij •'.K � e �' j,�.d ``"�I��kkk � �rl .Yj <<. .� .1� ��` �I'
.• _ �• Lori I� '[r i�
_ S� u:,�� :�C:.L � � �:.Fr` ''M1`, ''�^ •v}. ��a��rPi41..;jj q+��'}, �?'_ ,. .`1'�• -t'I .ti .
:�����7:� �•I_I�� �:. �-7�Y.6%,'..,•. 'Y i i%,`)f'r� t� .�'• f ill-�•:7�-;fit".'s' _�� 1 ... _ .. �.' �"tie 'a�e•L�� � _'`.

717,
VV
44

Nip
501
Ell
�!. _ _ .'t� :'Ya• '� { 7�1' .4.T•!�l?r v, + 14 '. :�� �• �' �r+; 1 4 �: ;�
$'i� + :+:! .• '�1. fir. 1TF � � •.. i�. ' V
A0.

.i,
~:cif
• • �
""'�,�•-. �• � , Y
}

SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
RAYMOND A. IVEY
& JEAN C. IVEY
PIN: 1526-69-5895.000
(NO DEED INFORMATION FOUND)
TOTAL IMPACT (OFFSITE)
10,600 SF (0.24 ACRES)
40' PERMANENT UTILITY EASEME
DB. 4079 P
10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEME
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT DB. 4079 PG.
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
TOP = 197.28'
INV IN(NE)=185.57'
INV OUT(SW)=185.28'
INV IN: 185.48
� Al'
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE /
TOP = 198.83' p'
INV IN(NE)=184.53'
INV OUT(SW)=184.50'
/ � //•.
EASENTEid��� .
JANET JACKSON DOFFERMYRE &
INV = 191.78' �^ / /� _MARKER
, IP AP//' \\ PAMELA JUNE JACKSON NEWSOME
PIN: 1526-79-5573.000
INV = 191.19' /� \CJ �� / 55 / // DB. 3484 PG. 74
, • 40' PERM�I�ENT UTILITI�E\ \ MB. 2002 PG. 1359
DB. 3982PG. 72Z0-
FORCE MAIN MARKER T' W ��
TEMP RARY CON NEA iMEE I
PRNJA�NENPDRNAG ��
JURISDICTIONAL 0�� /�"�� 4" ROPW WUJJL T EASEMENTW y W W DB. RG�i W W y \ \
OPEN WATER �L\P � �_INV�192.�1' �.�783V'G,V ,.
INV = 190.58' P m/ J • �� �' W. / ✓ 20' A�CES�SA��1v1JT \ /d W 11 W
DPr 154�3 PG.�82
36" RCP _
INV=190.48'/,�� _ / '4 j N�=192.57'`` �1y_may W W y y W W y
v, 71 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL (TYP.)
INV IN: 189.63 -
INV OUT: 189.43 '/// // �_, \ -� ��-------_ --
�30' CP&L EASEMENT \ �, BUILDING \ W ` ��
�� EAS�SITE--,_-���
IMPACT 1 , /%//% OF -WAY \ \ \ 4 782
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATER a�/' r / 9 G. 30 \ \ / \ \ \� W W W /W W W / W W
805 SF (0.02 ACRES) i I• //' \ \ \ r - I - W �\ � DITCH CT40NA� W y W W W W MIN 1 SCOTT WILSON
INV IN: 188.63 -' \ \ \ \ DITCH W i W W y W W W/ ` \ PIN: 1526-2 PG. 1.000
\ �'/ EASEIv�ENT \ \ � � \ w �• / �• � �• � �• \ DB. 3522 PG. 317
INV OUT: 188.4444444� \ MARKER e / CEL/t TOWER
r \ \ \ \
//- I \ \ I F�EIGHT = 255'
/ \ i
NT �/6' CHAINLINK6€I�CE
\ \
INV IN' 49'2.15 L
NT \\ \\ \` *MV OUT: 191.95 / \\ \\ \ \ �� VETL,ANDFI,,,„ W \ \ \
\�N
10,
INV IN: 186.13 y W \ \\ \ \ \ W yX�W W W \ W \ I S
INV OUT: 185.93 J I \ \ \\ \\ \I c\ W 1 I FTC
MAIN VALVE
MARKER 1� \\ \ \ \ 36
FIRE HYDRANT y \ \ �ISDICTIONAL
WATER VALVE (TYP.) \ \
\ BITCH, , INV IN: 193.85
\ \ \ INV OUT: 193.65
WATER VAULT
\ \ IMPACT 2
y W ST TCENTERL bk
I JURISDICTIONAL DITCH
FEE RQPERT \�E 1,144 SF (0.026 ACRES) \/ \
M 015 a5 \ - � - �' \ KIMBERLY DAWN JACKSON HAYES
\ \ \ - & TROY PAUL JACKSON
\ MB. 2 4 P�. \ \ �' \ i PIN: 1526-78-6000.000
INV IN: 196.04 - -
\ \ i INV OUT: 195.84 DB. 3224 PG. 52
\ � / - -
GLENDA SUE WEST
I / I PIN:1526-77-6970.000
DB.832 PG.853
RICUL� RALIFIELD DITCH
NO - 1 RISDIIL�IONAL 21? �22S1
o i i
o' A \
19� \ WETL,tom/� s ��' 9 / �1l \ I (TYP.)
i ✓ I ELECTRIC POLE TYP.
6, 24" RCP �Q
\\
y W \ \ \ \ \ INV OUT: 198_05 _ \ \ \ / '9/ / I INV = 191.58' O
75� INV =191.51'
50
1
W Et P O N D \ ��\\\\ 36' \ \ EANOUT\ ERT
1 I I I Q
W \ P f� E : 18 9 \ \ \\\\\ \ XX' \�EL \FEE \ \ - - \ \ \ / \l I / I / / / / / ✓� ' i O
TRACT 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ / \ \ \ \ 1 I 1 I / /I I Cp
ROOMS TO GO DISTRIBUTION CO LLC I \ - -' �) \ \\ - - \ \ \ \ �El°� \ I I
y CP&L/EASE NT
PIN: 1526-46-8343.000 { CENTERLINE OF CREEP( IS PROPERTY
DB. 3190 PG. 0372 "" 1 MB.\2015 PG. 35 / \
MB. 2014 PG. 97 W / MB. p014 PG. 97 /
`I WETPON BUILLG 1
640'\1890'
\621 'PMKING SPACES
W y \ `� \\ IIII -' ' \ - JLRISDJ_TIONAL \_12 ADA-SPACES
I \ W�ETLAN�
I \ \\ �- // \\ -5TCH �\ 271 t2AILER SPACES
\14-EFE: 201 ,,
'/llalllllll \
_ 0 CLEARLY DEFINED C AN L / 4�1 II III / \ IMPACT 3 \ \ \ \ I I I ^,CZ / /
APPROXIMATE INE FCIPp� \ ! \ \ \ \ - / /J 1
\ \ I I III I j� RISDICTIONAL DITCH' - - \ \ \ \ \ \ / I I , /
MB.2015OG.35 IIIIIII \ I \ _ \ I ^ �
I IIII I 4,890 SF- (fl:1 � ACRES) \ \
// 4co
�`/ I/ i
/70�@J �y��
\495- ' o i mil!
I \ \ \
W I \ 1 I /// II \ \ \ \ TOTAL IMPACT (ONSITE INCLUDING DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS -
\ \ \ 1/I / /.I \ \ \ \ 6,839 ASP (0.157 ACRES) _ - - �o� - - - - _ _ \ , \ J I / 1 1 \ \ \ O \ '�/ /
�1 40 / �•
JURIS\DICTI \ L DITClj
\ \ �lgly'-`WETPOND
I I L _ --- PpE: 177 , yirli
I
CREEK T(�Y {/ // r l/ I // �� FIRF� HYDRA T
�
II III /� 1 I / 1 \ \ 6'\ \ \ \ l �.�-•��r_ ���,\�\\� ;�='- - // r/
I l/ CI NTERLIWE OF EEK PERT
\ MOB. 2015 �G. 35
MB. 12014PG. 97
so
jf
/%/
a
Z
Z
a
J
Z
J
a
a
Lu
a
'H
M
o
J
J
a
o
Z_
F
Z
0
Lu
Z
D:f
O
w
6
z
0
U)
w
w
rn
0
°5
0 0
r
N d
u
J
W
Z00
�
arnz
aLOF
o °i
N 0) Z
N o
LLI x
L` w
u
J_
w r U
U)0LLJ
J
_j C4
04
F- N
F-
EL
oa
Z
�
rn �
o
a
N 0
SEAL
DATE
1/10/2023
ISSUED FOR
REVIEW
SHEET NO.
C201
0 150 300 450
WETLANDS, Il

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0027173
Project Name: Dunn Industrial Park
e x
hSai k 4YYFJiYJft
+cfln7i�
i�
December 20, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

12/20/2022
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

12/20/2022
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

12/20/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

12/20/2022
Project Summary
Project Code: 2023-0027173
Project Name: Dunn Industrial Park
Project Type: Commercial Development
Project Description: This project is located in Harnett County, NC and is approximately 136
acres.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.30841985,-78! 57564072833758,14z
4ms To 3°
Li
1
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

12/20/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
NAME
STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
(Threatened)
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
STATUS
Candidate

12/20/2022
4
Flowering Plants
NAME
STATUS
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

12/20/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation 31
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to Jul
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation 15
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Aug 25
USA and Alaska.

12/20/2022
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental 31
USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)

12/20/2022
3
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
AmeBCCrican I BCRestrel .�II 11111111 IN� --- �--- ---- ---- —'+—
Nuthatcheaded —+++ --++ ��11 E.1 IIII IIII III +--- --'— — — — — — — — — —+'—
Brown-hBCC -BCR
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide —+++ —�++ — ---- ---- —++—
(CON)
Prothonotary
BCC
arbler ide - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -++-
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird —�+� —�++ --+— — 4- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —+'
BCC -BCR
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoidins7-and-minimizins7-incidental-take-mis7ratorv-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly

12/20/2022 4
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding.
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

12/20/2022 5
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. 'BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. 'BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of

12/20/2022
H.
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

12/20/2022
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Name: Mason Montgomery
Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address Line 2: Suite 104
City: Raleigh
State: NC
Zip: 27615
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

■�r'f NC DEPARTMENT CF
Nor III
JUKE NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
No I
December 20, 2022
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE. Dunn Industrial Park, 15365.W4
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
Ray Cooper, Governor
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-20330
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here.
httl2s //www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTt1ENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
4] 121 W JONES STREET, RALEI01_ NC 27603 - 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 2761*
OFC !Dig 707.9120 • FAX 919.707.412,

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Dunn Industrial Park
Project No. 15365.W4
December 20, 2022
NCNHDE-20330
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
cientific Name
Common Name
Group
Observation
Date dhM
Dragonfly or
33771
Somatochlora
Coppery Emerald
2004-Pre
Damselfly
georgiana
Dragonfly or
33751
Somatochlora
Coppery Emerald
2004-Pre
Damselfly
georgiana
Dragonfly or
33781
Stylurus ivae
Shining Clubtail
2004-Pre
Damselfly
Freshwater Fish31798
Enneacanthus
Blackbanded Sunfish
1962-08-19
chaetodon
Vascular Plant
9599
Buchnera americans
American Bluehearts
1950-07-02
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
f�,7anaged Area Name Own
City of Dunn Open Space City of Dunn
Element
Accuracy
Federal State
Global
State
Occurrence
Status Status
Rank
Rank
Rank
I
M i
-9
H?
5-Very
--- Significantly
G3G4
S1?
Low
Ra re
H?
5-Very
--- Significantly
G3G4
S1?
Low
Ra re
H?
5-Very
--- Significantly
G4
S1?
Low
Ra re
H
3-Medium
--- Significantly
G3G4
S3
Ra re
H
4-Low
--- Endangered
GNR
S1
Owner Type =
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on December 20, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q3, October 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

Memorial
Cemetery
ly Rd
Pie
IP
sr akeside
Village
301
NCNHDE-20330: Dunn Industrial Park
a
a
Lec Rd
Jonesboro Rd wise
9s Jonesboro Rd
y W11A Rd _
y a S
� � Carolina
y c �
a r
a�
Ct0 • 'PG7 .' Fy � v � �
L
Dunn
Fe
r
0
P
H^r
7
a
a �
w
� 7
ns
N a
W+E
S
December 20, 2022
0 Managed Area (MAREA)
0 Buffered Project Boundary
Project Boundary
I
r
r
C High ,d
55 NVSSF
m J
C �
° Harnett -Gunn PaC Hwy ! q-
\ r
ea
} 0.33 0.65 1.3 Mils
Sources: Esn, Airbus G5, USGS, NGA NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS,
NLS, 05. NMA, Geodat rAyrelsen, Rgks—terstaal, GSA, Geofand FEh9A,
Inlermap and the GIS user CAmmunity
Saurces� Esri, HERE. Gatmin, FAG, NOAA, USGS, 0 Opengt(N Map
coruributars. and Ine GIS User Community
Page 3 of 3

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Dunn Industrial Park
Date: January 16, 2022
/ Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
-Species
Tricolored Bat
Suitable habitat present,
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Perimyotis subflavus)
species not present
S&EC staff on January 10, 2022.
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Picoides borealis)
S&EC staff on January 10, 2022.
American Alligator
Suitable habitat present,
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Alligator mississippiensis)
species not present
S&EC staff on January 10, 2022.
Rough -leaved Loosestrife
Suitable habitat present
May affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
S&EC staff on January 10, 2022. Please
note this survey took place outside of the
optimal survey window (May through
October).
Bald Eagle
Unlikely to disturb nesting
No Eagle Act permit required
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Bald Eagles
S&EC staff on January 10, 2022.
Northern Long-eared Bat
Suitable habitat present,
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Myotis septentrionalis)
species not present
S&EC staff on January 10, 2022. Relying
upon the findings of the 1/5/2016
Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final
4(d) Rule on the Northern Long -Eared Bat
and Activities Excepted from Take
Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Mason Montaomery / Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department at S&EC, PA January 16, 2022
Signature /Title Date

United States Department of the Interior
Project Name D u n n
Dear Applicant:
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 1/16/2023
Self -Certification Letter
Industrial Park
U.t�.
FIE3LI Y Wrt.M amc
SNNVICIi
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or ❑
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
✓❑ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
0 "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect'' or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

[all;RRIMI
LEGEND
* EIP = EXISTING IRON POINT
* EIR = EXISTING REBAR
* CP = CALCULATED POINT
-0- ELECTRIC POLE
10 ELECTRIC VAULT
< GUY WIRE
WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
* SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
* SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
Eg FIBER-OPTIC VAULT
FIBER-OPTIC MARKER
o TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
O/H ELECTRIC LINE— 11E
STORM WATER LINE
FENCE
6' WIDE
JURISDICTIONAL
OPEN WA TER
6' WIDE
JURISDICTIONAL
OPEN WATER
roij
RIP- P
JURISDICTh
Z­ 17
-XISTING GRAVEL
DRIIE AND CELL
TOWER
3 96A
TRACT 1
ROOMS TO GO DISTRIBUTION CO LLC
PIN: 1526-46-8343.000
DB. 3190 PG. 0372
MB. 2014 PG. 97
WETLANDS
W2
EIP
CREEK TOP
JURISDICTIONAL
PERENNIAL
STREAM
4' WIDE
T TONAL
DI TCH
RAYMOND A. IVEY
& JEAN C. IVEY
PIN: 1526-69-5895.000
DEED INFORMATION FOUND)
JANET JACKSON DOFFERMYRE &
PAMELA JUNE JACKSON NEWSOME
PIN: 1526-79-5573.000
DB. 3484 PG. 74
MB. 2002 PG. 1359
c__ El NOT HELD
T11")
---------------------- --- v v . . .
------------------------------------
R�
----------------------- ------
------------- --
" w,
,4 IDE'
----------------------- I JR&DIC17OXA4
DITCht
v i
A GRICUL TURA LIFIEL D
DI TCH
NON -JURISDICTIONAL
LOT 1
SRE DUNN INDUSTRIAL,",PLC
PIN: 1526-77-5334 ------------
DB. 3990-P-G-.--4-8 9
MB. 2015 PIGS. 35 3 6
6,040,234 SF OR 138.6647-,ACRES
-( ARE A--Ta-C - ENTERLINE"'--,,' OF W. CORE-RQAD)
4'MDE
-------------
A------
Wt7LsklYDj
wi
MARY SCOTT WILSON
PIN: 1526-78-2681.000
DB. 3522 PG. 317
EIF BENT
KIMBERLY DAWN JACKSON HAYES
& TROY PAUL JACKSON
PIN: 1526-78-6000.000
DB. 3224 PG. 52
GLENDA SUE WEST
PIN: 1526-77-6970.000
DB. 832 PG. 853
------------
0 150 300 450
1,_
&=004 z
z
a.
0
Z
F_
a_
�
o
0
Q
Z
0 F-
cr)
Z
0 :2
0
D:f
Lu
a
6
z
0
U)
5;
Ld
w
0)
0
04 0ul
r-
04
00
u
z
Li
X_
Ld
z
a_ Obi z
u) ly
C)) Ld
— LLI
d C14 0) Z
z
C14 —
x o
Lu LL. z
u
F- Ld
(f)
-i
F-: 5;
_j
Ld
LLJ 00
>
u)
00
U)
L
LLJ
<
2: CC4)
F-
Of =F-
0
<
z
uO
Of
>_
C14 Q-
0
SEAL I � i / / /
c A Ro
0
)�4/2023
DATE
2/24/2023
ISSUED FOR
REVIEW
SHEET NO.
C100

6' WIDE
JURISDIC71ONAL
OPEN WATER
J
G Q P
IMPACT 1 - PERMANENT
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATER
COFFER DAMS AND OTHER
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
SHALL BE USED TO PROTECT 1
THE REMAINING PORTION OF
THE OPEN WATER 1
6' WIDE
JURISDICTIONAL 1
OPEN WATER
IMPACT 2 - PERMANENT
- NO PERM LOSS 1 ,
WETLAND IMPACT
v =
1 OFFSITE \
1 WETLANDS - r
40' PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENI
DB. 4079 PG.
1 °
1
TREE PROTECTION FENCE AND OTHER y
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
SHALL BE USED TO PROTECT 1 THE REMAINING PORTION OF
WETLANDS 1
IMPACT 3 - PERMANENT y
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH 1 W
1 WyW
COFFER DAMS AND OTHERS /
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
SHALL BE USED TO PROTECT
THE REMAINING PORTION OF
THE JURISDITIONAL DITCH
ILIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CREEK TOP
JURISDICTIONAL
PERENNIAL
STREAM A
--mml�
JURISDIC77ONAL
DI TCH
W WETLANDS y
W2 W WI
' 14 \
JURISDIC710k I INIA'L'o 11,111
-J
-- �. ,d-� W-y �. �. W �. �. ,-�✓W`.,� �. �. J� �. W �. y �. W �. W �. W �. y �. W �. W �. y :� �. W �. W �. y
C /
`7
200 WIDE'
�JO1Rt' DIFC)`IO ALA
\ a
DITCH.
0
FOR
C01
4' WIDE
'TTONAL
DI TCH
a
I-AGRICUL TURAL/FIELD
DI TCH
,NON -JURISDICTIONAL
00
■ ■
7__lr4_ TTT7
................
OPEN '000000000000p0•
.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.•.
WETLAND IMPACT
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\1
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH IMPACT
I I
/ I �I/I I fGECIRIC POGE CiVP.)
I
■ ■ rd
BUILDING 1 I
I I-
I
Id I
/ 1
fit
g3 // .\ /
I
co /
-- ------ 1 e /
` -- - V i l I�
.40
— 99 - I � / � J✓ %
-----
TORMWATERi/�
,94 /
- - CONTROL
- --- _MEASUR
/
s
5wl
\ 0 150 300 450
0 00 /
4' WIDE
JURISDICTIONAL
DI TCH
IMPACT 4 - PERMANENT
JURISDICTION UH ,
4,470 S�T-G
0 ACREt)
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS
ISSUED FOR:
■ PRELIMINARY
❑ MUNICIPAL REVIEW
❑ BID SET
❑ CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Z
W
0
CL
uj o
ON U
�y
J
t'0 Z
H U) g
w
W Y M d
CL
U) >
J (O O
W
F-
�>ooz
❑
W J
0-
U
Lu
z
�CL
r
"
Z
�
O
(D
O
a
J
00
N
�
N-)
a
Z
NO
F_
Z
Z
�
N
}
�
J
3
z
a
O
O
}
Z
O
~
z
�
LCu
C
U7
O
Z
O
O
D:f
L
O
W
L0
<
Z
=
W
6
z
0
w
w
rn
0
L5
o 0
7ry
r
N d
00 J
1.�
u
Z
Lj
a o "
a LO F
13
o °i w
N � Z
N
X
W
N
J
w r U
O
0
w ' Q
U
Q N
0)m N
N
F-
ly _ F-
O d
Z FE
U
0
0 }
a
N 0
i
CJ
SEAL IIICIAII���
9 L -�
i%�4/2023
DATE
2/24/2023
ISSUED FOR
REVIEW
SHEET NO.
C200

IMPACT 1 - PERMANENT
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATER
1068 SF (0.02 ACRES)
6' WIDE
JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH
IMPACT
INCLUDES � �
RIP -RA
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
IMPACT
INCLUDES
RIP -RAP
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
--------------
/
INV: 191.5 r,
125 LF 60"
H 3 PIPE
NV: 190
205 205
200
200
--__FINISHED
GRADE
BLOWUP 1 DUNN INDUSTRIAL PARK 0 40 80 120
DRIVEWAY CROSSING
DUNN, NORTH CAROLINA
JOB NUMBER 125-001 FEBRUARY 22, 2023 SCALE: 1" = 40'

IMPACT 2 - PERMANENT - NO PERM LOSS
WETLAND IMPACT
8,043 SF (0.18 ACRES)
i
------------
8" PVC SEWERMAIN
-"
v
'r
V
PUBLIC 12" DIP
S
WA TE R M A I N "-
M
Iy
OFFSITE WETLANDS
Y
" "
Y
I I
I I
,
--------
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
v v v
v
�9
v
v v
v
,,
Y
IN I
---------------
'M H 1 `, y
I
I
WETLAND IMPACT
BLOWUP 2 DUNN INDUSTRIAL PARK 0 40 80 120
OFFSITE WETLAND IMPACT
DUNN, NORTH CAROLINA
JOB NUMBER 125-001 FEBRUARY 22, 2023 SCALE: 1" = 40'

EX
1
2
CN
202
06
00
N
OO
0)
0O
0')
198
WETLAND
IMPACT
194
12
ATERMAIN
190
35 LF OF
8' PVC
2 r I
0.5% 811
S 186
385 LF
OF 8" PVC
©0.5%
0.
76 LF
.60' PVC 00.5%
5.28'
INV
OUT: 188
11'
INV IN:
INV OUT:
IN: 18
OUT: 1
182
OF 8"
INV IN: 186.18'
INV OUT: 185.98'
189.18'
188.98'
178
174
170
BLOWUP 2A DUNN INDUSTRIAL PARK 0 40 80 120
OFFSITE WETLAND IMPACT PROFILE
DUNN, NORTH CAROLINA
JOB NUMBER 125-001 FEBRUARY 22, 2023 SCALE: 1" = 40'

NN NN
lJ
NN 1,
q/
I NN 11 NN NN
'IN IMPACT 3 PERMANENT
0 NON N N --------------------------
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH
782 SF (0.02 ACRES)
14
INN)
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE INN
VN \\N 1>
NN \11,
N/\
W
ON JURISDICTIONAL DITCH I M PACbn
T
NN\
%
NN,
IN NN,
NN,
-- ------
Z 11 No, --
NNI NNN
NN NN
N
NN NN
NNN 11 INN NN,
NN NNNNN\\\\
INN \1 NNN NN \N\\
NN N, I \1 NNNNN N /79
cP
NN NN NNNNN
N "NNNNN"N\\
NN NNI N\",\,
NN\
uo
-A
NN NN \N\\
00, Lo-
BLOWUP 3 DUNN INDUSTRIAL PARK 0 40 80 120
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH IMPACT
DUNN, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1 40'
JOB NUMBER 125-001 FEBRUARY 22, 2023

--------------------------------- ---
-----------
98
---------------------
\b - 5 >
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
--------------- - ---------
----------- ---------
> -------------
----------------------
> COFFER DAMS AND OTHER
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 41
SHALL BE USED TO PROTECT
THE REMAINING PORTION OF
THE JURISDITIONAL. DITCH
---------- -
----------------------------------
----- ------
------------
----------
---------- ------------
----------------------
-----------------
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........
-----------------
----- -------- ----- ------
------------ - - ------
----------------------------
---------------------- ---
---------------
Rh------------ ---------- -----------------------------
------------
----------
--------------
-------------
"vill 1 lill
IMPACT 4 PERMANENT------___--_
rl;,;ll;l,;
III.----------
IIIIIII;II I -
IIIIIII;II,I,;
RE
'i;
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH
-A,79 SF (0.10 ACS)
-----------------
-----------
----------- --------------
-------- ---
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH IMPACT ONE=
-----------------------------
--------------- ---- - -------
---------- ------------
BLOWUP 4 DUNN INDUSTRIAL PARK 0 80 160 240
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH IMPACT
DUNN, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: 1 80'
JOB NUMBER 125-001 FEBRUARY 22, 2023

V
'A
1,90,\
WEST SCM
POST POND TRIB
30.7 AC @ 90% IMP & 4'AVG DEPTH
±0.81 AC PERM POOL POND SA (PER MANUAL)
001
PRE POND TRIB
101 AC
#1
---------- 44V
1%
V//m
#1
7--A
:�o� � /1-1 71�
Li
O
w CO 0
0
0
C'4
(D F-
z
Ld
—i
F- U)
Ld
Lij
Ld
Of
>
F- 0 >LLI
LLJ
F- F-
LO > CO Z
C)
rl —
LL' X: I
� 0-
U)
LLI <
w z
CL zi
L0 u-
L
L0
po
4,
4, a.
Lu
no
� � a
Lu
------------- 0
o
F
M
'000,I I Z
-200 0
0
-----------
'o
-T I
z
Ln
/', / Ld
0)
C)
C14 co
0 C) 0
ul
i r a-
C14
' , /' � rl Q
z
Ld
----- ------- SOUTH SCM Q-0)z
--------------
z < Lo
uj
------------------- POST POND TRIB L9 C14 CD Z
70.4 AC @ 90% IMP & 6'AVG DEPTH z x
w u- z
±1.45 AC PERM POOL POND SA (PER MANUAL) w
F- 5;
Ld
Ld
w co
<
U*)
i F 00 F-
Egli, ul
0)
<
'q-
-J
Ul C14
---- ----- ---
LLI C14
C14
F-
F-
------------------ ---
S-c M �,
,; z CD
----------- ----------------- FE
-- ----
C14
04 ---------------
SEAL
------------ --- ---- ---- ------ --
-e - ----- jr,00,
---- ------
I - ---------
----------
----------
---- ------
DATE
2 17/2023
-- --------------
------------ 7
ISSUED FOR
REVIEW
SHEET NO.
PRE POND TRIB
34.7 AC