Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230391 Ver 1_Haybales Todd Ramsey PCN Package_20230312PCN Application Additional Information Package Name: Haybales Crossing Permit County: Johnston Date: 3/12/23 Table of Contents 1)Agent Letter 2) Maps A)Soils B) Quad 3)Project Drawings a) Design and Impact Sheet 4) Endangered Species 5)SHPO Documents 6)Neuse Buffer Letter December 1S, 2021 US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Mr. Chris Hopper Re: Haybales LLC Tract., Johnston County I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described SPIN 266400-02-2450 ) for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Also., Mr Wyatt Brawn of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc has my permission to act as my agent on this property concerning wetlands and streams. IVA Pro"" i LL � OHWON C(�On NORTH•CAROLINA 11 /16/22, 2:12 PM The National Map - Advanced Viewer Help Data Download Services rpo Os — — — — — — ... ... ... ... ... Scale: 1:7,028 Zoom Level: 16 1 700ft -78.123 35.512 Long Lat REACH Roo< RE) Show search results for 608 Fell... USGS The National Map: National Boundari A, 'W https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ EIP BONNIE BARBER 77 4 D, B, 5317, PG, z � O °j 21 cc o� N/F RAINB❑W INVESTMENTS ,0) DB 1998, PG 662 S87°53'26"E o(v El ------------------------------------------------- 436.73' -------------------------------- °j4,j----------0 N O 1 / co n i / BEARINGS AND DISTANCES AL❑N ; S88'14'06"E 289.33' DASAHED LINES WERE TAKEN FROM ; EIP P. B. 35, PG. 171 / � 1 / (Vco ! 1 / SS 1 N/F c�3 EDWARD WENDT o DB 5090, PG, 754 S�3�44,3 1 o(V �, ry 2 4, 1 ± ACRES REMAIN N _ 182 E REMAINDER NOT SURVEYED AT THIS TIME ZSS I o I CD /C)/ i / �� 4,.j o) cv DI 1 / C) 4.tj ' 1 — ' �� �. ' 00 \ , _ (n INE _ awn / �" -------- 175 / \ ASS SS ............. T�' v.�1 ____I+OQ ........ ........'.'.'. . .6.. f.. ...................... F�—.L-.—_�... 2+00......... ......... ............ .... —1 72—-----�� — -- ..7..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'......................'... .'............-L� _._ ..i.._......._. .. _ .i.._ ... _....... ... 1 ��.. . ........ -. —_. ...................-1__....�.�L._ 3+00...................................... .........................�j.... .. —1._ ... ...................... q+00 ..... ....... ... ... .........,i%�... `.,\� 1 ..................................... .I—.....- ..... _L �.L_.... ... .. .. / ZZZ-_---------------------- - — O O PB 45, PG, 341 PB 45, PG. 341 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY GRAPHICALLY APPEARS NOT TO BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS DETERMINED BY FEMA/FIRM COMMUNITY PANEL NO. _3720266400 J_& 3720265400_J WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12-02-05 TOP OF BANK zN 0 V� z0- QCX3 W In =N Q� -- VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE n Inmij7R HAY BALES, LLC 267 WOODALL FARM LANE PRINCETON, NC 27569 SEALS �`% ICA es Q < _ SEAL = 22993 R. DocuSigned by: E t t, thA),S , r, 03/08/20238 REVISIONS x � Z x � U aU O �a O �a 00� O REVIEWED BY: LRH DESIGNED BY: LRH DRAWN BY: LRH DATE: AUG 2022 PROJECT NUMBER: 2202 OVERALLSURVEY AUGUST 2022 z GENERAL NOTES ASS / C:) \ \ 0) 4.tj Dj \ \ . Tcy 2 0 32 LF 36—IN PIPE CENTERED ON STREAM WITH INVERTS AT 167.8 (8 INCHES OF BURY) AT 0.9% SLOPE � // / - \ . \ . \ 3 @ 32 LF 30—IN PIPE ON BOTH SIDES OF 0 / / \ \ / 36" PIPES WITH INVERTS AT 168.5 AT 0.8% SLOPE Z / ("V \ . \ . i SPACE PIPES AT 6 FEET ON CENTER TO ALLOW 1� p) \ — — i PROPER SUPPORT AND COMPACTION. 1-4j PLACE CLASS "B" RIP RAP IN THE STREAM BED \ \�� / °~ VICINITY MAP r NO HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING BED ELEVATION x NOT TO SCALE (SO IT IS FLUSH WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE CHANNEL) ��� 1-�'2 --A — Q AND ALSO LINE THE STREAM BANKS FOR A DISTANCE�� �� / 23A� Z / OF 20 LF FROM EACH OUTLET. i� / \ I \ ��/�� / HAY BALOWNE LLC O TOP OF BANK \ \\ \ \ 171 — �.. /�I I .. 1 �� 267 WOODALL FARM LANE 4jj/ / \�� ?o / ��jr— PRINCETON NC 27569 ISO- 0) \\tip � (v l / l V i' ) I \ / r� / o(� _ .�� / 30" INVE�TS 169'25 �, �, _ =,yam , �, �, �, 36 " 4V VERTS,�,167. 6 l l i 2 3 SS-.--._- a� �30" INItRTS 1t'8.5 (. / �.<� 1/ t21 36',IJNVERT\S 167.8,�, _ \ f-j 1 PROPOSED DRIVE .41 .� \ ISS / � 75--------------___ _-17��74 —., `.�o,� �( oo� �,,otiF� lr .........................1+0 _ _ 1— _—_�1 .---. 0.. .-.- _.�._.�............... ��� ...... .... 2+00 .... .. .. .. 72� -� ------ \— \ �. -..— _ , - — -. .. — _ — _ . .: — tF TOP OF BANK �jj'�............. 1--- .....-.J-=—.-.—=1=.= _. ._.� ..3+00......._ ..�. _................. 4+00 .... ..................... .............. — _ ........... . ... ..... ....... .. ...... ZZZ---------------------- .......... ....... - - - �- .. . ................................ -1-�= .= .= ........ X �- 173 - /\�---------- ------------.............. ------------------ �.p \,_A\-O --------------------- r I \ 10111 170 160 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY STA 0+00 THRU STA 7+36.91 PLAN z SCALE: 1" - 50' H 0 0 0 Q Approximate Natural Ground Approximate 5+00.0 Proposed Grade LVK 118�33FT y — — — — — — — —0.53 _► — — 2 32-LF-36-IN WL14f INVERTS AT 1 AT 0.9% SLOPE 3 36 32 LF 30-IN PIPES WITH IN SP PIPES AT 6PRICE PER SUPPORT 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 00 ro ro 0) CO O 0) 0) N O Ln N 00 Ln�t N �t O N�t r� O 0) 00 ro O 0) 00 CO c6N U�00 I'7`4: Ln0 Lnrl� L6n 4( 4(7� 4rl� -:O ON OU? I\c0 r-Ln r-Ln r-Ln r-�t �N I\N I\N r-M r-ro r-M PROPOSED DRIVEWAY STA 0+00 THRU STA 7+36.91 PROFILE SCALE: 1" - 5' (H) SCALE: 1" - 10' (V) 1. EXISTING SITE SURVEY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROVIDED BY JERRY BALL SURVEYING, PC AND JOHNSTON COUNTY GIS. THESE PLANS DO NOT ASSUME ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY EXISTING INFORMATION, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN, ON THE SURVEY AND ANY CHANGES TO THE EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED AFTER THE SURVEY WAS ISSUED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE TYPE, SIZE, DEPTH, MATERIAL, AND LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY IF UNKNOWN ELEMENTS ARE DISCOVERED THAT WOULD NECESSITATE MODIFICATION TO DESIGN. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULA TIONS. :i IPE CENTERED ON STREAM 7.8 (8 INCHES OF BURY) IPE ON BOTH SIDES OF ERTS AT 168.5 AT 0.8% SLOPE FEET ON CENTER TO ALLOW ND COMPACTION. 160 7+50 ENGTH OF PIPE SHOWN IS MINIMUM. BUILDER MAY INCREASE THE LENGTH IF NECESSARY WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER. 12' WIDTH FILL SLOPES TO BE STABILIZED WITH VEGETATION AND/OR RIP RAP AS NECESSARY SCALE: 1 " = 30' MIN 3' SHOI. FOR DRI VEWi / \ 3 1 112 TO 2 FT OF COVER TYPICAL DRIVEWAY SECTION OVER PIPE SUMMARY OF IMPACTS WETLANDS 1,008.1 SF (0.023 AC) ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER 3,261.5 SF ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER 2,168.5 SF w a CN V1 z00 0 W �E Q N �- zQ 0) c 000.� W SEALS ICAzz les Q SEAL 22993 IN R. S % DocuSigned by: A34868BOA9C54F8... 03/08/2023 REVISIONS W Q x � Z U aU �a O O �a 00� O REVIEWED BY: LRH DESIGNED BY: LRH DRAWN BY: LRH DATE: AUG 2022 PROJECT NUMBER: 2202 PLAN, PROFILE, AND IMPACTS PLAN DW - 1 AUGUST 2022 2/25/23, 3:42 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Location Johnston County, North Carolina �'ud�.fl [iuu.a v Local office Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office t. (919) 856-4520 JEJ (919) 856-4556 MAILING ADDRESS Pnct nffira Rnv 227)r, https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 1/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM I V.7L V I I IL.0 LJ U^ J.J / LLJ Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 IPaC: Explore Location resources PHYSICAL ADDRESS 551 Pylon Drive, Suite F Raleigh, NC 27606-1487 �o� Foy https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 2/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required. 4 T> Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following: 1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE. 2. Click DEFINE PROJECT. 3. Log in (if directed to do so). 4. Provide a name and description for your project. 5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries). Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ). https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 3/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources 2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location: Mammals NAME Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515 Birds NAME STATUS Proposed Endangered STATUS Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Edda g Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 Amphibians 0 NAME � STATUS Neuse River Waterdog NecturM s lewisi Threatened Wherever found _" There i al critical habitat for this species. Your location does no la e critical habitat. t s:// os. ws.gov/ecp/species/6772 V%4Nft00lF Fishes NAME STATUS Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered Wherever found There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528 Clams NAME STATUS https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 4/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni IPaC: Explore Location resources Threatened Wherever found There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164 Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784 Tar River Spinymussel Parvaspina steinstansana Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392 Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata Endangered Endangered %0% Threatened Wherever found 1 There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does/ not overlap the critical habitat. I'M i https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511 Insects NAME STATUS Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Vitips://4os.fws.gov/ecp/�Species/9743 Critical habitats Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. There are no critical habitats at this location. Migratory birds https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 5/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acts. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. Additional information can be found using the following links: Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov//program/migratory-birds/species Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-tak 41 migratory -birds 0\ Nationwide conservation measures for birds 00( https://www.fws.g measures.pdf The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ bell. -This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31 This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 6/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla IPaC: Explore Location resources Breeds Mar 1 to Jul 15 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Probability of Presence Summary Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25 Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31 _�J The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence ( ) 41�1.x Camp Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4- week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 7/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. Breeding Season( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort (1) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. No Data ( ) 44 A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe ti Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. probability of presence reeding season I survey effort no data SPECIES ]AN FEB MAR APR MAY 1UN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Non. Eagle 1-0—m—m ■■■r it 1 JJ 16—h—E Vulnerable Brown -headed Nuthatch �11 111111111111 IIF BCC - BCR Chimney Swift BCC Ra gewide (CON) Prothonotary Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Al L—E—EIII 111—h Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 8/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool. *4 What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN),. This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets. AMhL Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 9/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study_ and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. �. IL i j What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain p rmit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. V Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 10/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources Facilities National Wildlife Refuge lands Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. There are no refuge lands at this location. Fish hatcheries There are no fish hatcheries at this location. Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engi e rs D' tri This location did not intersect any wetlands mapped by NWI. NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below. Data limitations The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis. https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 11/12 2/25/23, 3:42 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. Data exclusions Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial '14 imagery. Data precautions Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4JOKCX5JYVDTHKPZHU5VYOG2DI/resources 12/12 Roy Cooper, Governor 0■0■0 INC DEPARTMENT OF ■■0■o NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ■ ■■■ February 25, 2023 wyatt brown Brown's Environmental Group, inc 242 Batten Farm Road Selma, NC 27576 RE. Haybales Driveway Dear wyatt brown. D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary Misty Buchanan Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program NCNHDE-21073 The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our records. The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here. httl2s //www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally - listed species are documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program DEPAR71MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699 OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX 919.707.9121 Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Haybales Driveway February 25, 2023 NCNHDE-21073 Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common NameM Last '� Element Accuracy Federal State Global State Group 0servation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank i Date = Rank Dragonfly or 33753 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G3G4 S1? Damselfly georgiana Low Rare No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on February 25, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q4, Winter (January) 2023. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 2 of 3 NCNHDE-21073: Haybales Driveway v c t c C � N l9 W Rai s Cros oads a ris qd N WL 229ft S February 25, 2023 Q Buffered Project Boundary Q Project Boundary `245 ft 0 4 a 233 ft dford Cr" ac Ra �s crossroads Rd Boye / / / / / F / O o / o• / a / 4'6 6 a m 'r / ce Rd CgC l 162 ft 0.25 / 0.5 1 Miles So uross. Fsh, Airbus DS. USGS. NGA. NASA, CGIAR. N Robinson. NCFAS. NLS. OS, NMA. Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat GSA, Geoland, FFMA, It-mapand the GIS user community Sources. Esri, HERE. Garm in. FAO. NOAA, USGS. © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User in, Page 3 of 3 � � � W . 0 \ kh v DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES PO BOX 2263 SMITHFIELD, NC 27577 (919) 989-5075 November 3, 2021 Hay Bales, LLC Todd Ramsey 267 Woodall Farm Ln. Princeton, NC 27569 Subject: Neuse River Buffer Call NBR# NB 21-032 Project Name: Fellowship Church Rd (NC Pin# 266400-02-2450) Location / Directions: 608 Fellowship Church Rd. Subject Stream: F-A UT to Nahunta Swamp (C; NSW) Determination Date: October 5, 2021 Staff. Charles Pender Not Soil USGS Latitude Longitude Feature Subject Subject Start @ Stop @ Survey' Topo (Dec. (Dec. Degrees) Degrees) F-A ® ❑ Not Subject n/a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Explanation: The feature(s) listed above that are checked "Subject" to the Johnston County Neuse Riparian Buffer Ordinance (Section 14-393 Johnston County Code of Ordinances) has or have been approximately shown on either the Soil Survey of Johnston County, North Carolina (1994) or the most recent version of the 1:24,000 (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic maps prepared by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS), and have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. There may be other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but still may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by Johnston County may request a determination by the Director of the Division of Water Resources c/o the 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit, or its successor. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of the date of this letter or from the date the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the Director must be submitted in writing with a copy of this letter to: North Carolina Division of Water Resources 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, a request for an appeal has been made in writing within sixty (60) days. The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any Local, State, and Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office at (919) 554-4884 and the Division of Water Resources 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit at (919) 791-4200. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Charles Pender at (919) 209-8333 or via email at charles.pender@johnstonnc.com. Sincerely, Charles Pender, Jr. Engineering and Environmental Technician COHWON (NOUN _ ;�. NORTH"CAROLINA •~°~ ti°i 1- _ �9 5f- a :■ to, xr, a' AlL a ,E,.�.,-,ter.■o _ r�� j .. n it 's:% r'f' �'}�J�i'i ■■ r. -� �.: ■ ■ ;�fi i r'i a e°r m•,e - e • r c I ■■ t n ■ ■�J. D I j■ _� f ,