20230380 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230309

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? *
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
1/16/2023
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20230380 1
Is a payment required for this project? *
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone] Andrew Pitner:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Vest to Franklin Force Main Improvement Project
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Justin Webster, PE
1b. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/9/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Stewart Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
c
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.266232
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-80.873313
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
N/A - easement held by Charlotte Water
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
5100 Brookshire Boulevard
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28216
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
United States
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Danielle Clark, PWS
4b. Business Name:
Hart & Hickman, PC
4c. Address
Street Address
3912 Sunset Ridge Road
Address Line 2
Suite 301
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27607
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
United States
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Stewart Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501030101
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The Site consists of an existing easement owned and operated by Charlotte Water that connects the Franklin Water Treatment Plant (WTP) located at 5100 Brookshire Boulevard and the
Vest WTP located at 820 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The Site consists primarily of a maintained utility corridor and public rights -of -ways along
roadways. The Site is located in a primarily residential and light industrial area.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
202
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The force main improvement project involves the installation of a 16-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) force main to transport residuals and backwash from the Vest WTP to the Franklin WTP for
treatment.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The project will utilize heavy equipment and open -cut trenching techniques to install the force main pipe.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes
Comments:
No G Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2023-00273
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Julia McGuire
Hart & Hickman, PC
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
The Corps conducted a desktop review and a PJD was issued by Doug Perez on 3/6/2023.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? *
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
Stream Access Crossing
Permanent
Fill
SCE
Perennial
Both
10
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S2
Stream Crossing for Pipe
Installation
Temporary
Other
SCE
Perennial
Both
10
Average (feet)
29
(linear feet)
S3
Stream Crossing for Pipe
Installation
Temporary
Other
SCB
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S4
Stream Crossing for Pipe
Installation
Temporary
Other
SCD
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
30
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
89
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
119

3j. Comments:
The permanent stream impact involves the installation of an emergency access crossing. The temporary stream impacts involve open -cut trenching to
install the force main pipe. Upon completion of the force main installation, the temporary stream impacts will be restored to pre -construction conditions.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation O
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed force main improvement project is located within an existing easement that connects the Franklin WTP located at 5100 Brookshire
Boulevard and the Vest WTP located at 820 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The easement is owned and
operated by Charlotte Water.
H&H reviewed State and Federal threatened and endangered species databases for the Site and conducted a screening survey of the Site and
surrounding area for federally -listed threatened and endangered species and their habitats, and none were identified. H&H also reviewed the National
Registry of Historic Places (NRHP) for Sites located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC
SHPO) GIS viewer; and the Site and surrounding area via visual reconnaissance for the potential presence of historic, cultural, and/or archeological
sites. No recorded sites were noted on or adjacent to the Site. H&H requested comment on the Site from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS),
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), and NC SHPO in November 2022. Agency responses are included in Appendix D.
To minimize Site impacts, the proposed installation plan was designed to avoid Waters of the US to the maximum extent practicable. The force main
installation will be conducted entirely within an existing easement, and no additional land area is required to facilitate this project. Furthermore, the force
main pipe will completely avoid crossings to SCA in the eastern portion of the Site and to Stewart Creek in the central portion of the Site. The force main
will be installed below an existing culvert located within SCA and will not result in additional impacts to SCA. The force main will be installed aerially on
existing piers in and near Stewart Creek and will not result in additional impacts to Stewart Creek. Only temporary impacts to SCB, SCD, and SCE are
required to facilitate the installation of the force main pipe. The only permanent impact proposed by the project is to SCE to install an emergency access
crossing, which will be used by Charlotte Water for maintenance and access throughout the easement as needed. The permanent impact is minimal and
only totals approximately 30 linear feet of stream impact. Furthermore, the force main pipe is needed by Charlotte Water in order to pump residuals and
backwash generated at the Vest WTP to the Franklin WTP for treatment where Charlotte Water has the greater capacity and technology to do so.
The force main will be installed using open -cut trench techniques within the streams and throughout the easement, and the streams will be restored to
pre -construction conditions and contours upon the completion of the installation. The restoration activities will be conducted in accordance with Charlotte
Water's design manual.
During Site development, good erosion and sediment control practices will be followed. Extensive silt fencing will be used on the construction Site
perimeter and along stream channels.
Mitigation
Mitigation is typically required by Nationwide Permit #58 for stream impacts greater than 0.02 acre. Although the proposed permanent stream impact
only totals approximately 0.007 acre, the Site is located within the 103 Watershed. Permanent impacts within the 103 Watershed which result in the loss
of jurisdictional waters typically require compensatory mitigation. Therefore, compensatory mitigation for the 30-linear foot (0.007-acre) impact to SCE is
proposed in the form of purchasing mitigation credits from the City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank. The Credit Reservation
Letter is attached in Appendix F. Based on the NC SAM, the stream quality of SCE is low. Based on the results of the NC SAM, the proposed mitigation
ratio for stream impact is 2:1.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed force main improvement project is located within an existing easement that connects the Franklin WTP located at 5100 Brookshire
Boulevard and the Vest WTP located at 820 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The easement is owned and
operated by Charlotte Water.
H&H reviewed State and Federal threatened and endangered species databases for the Site and conducted a screening survey of the Site and
surrounding area for federally -listed threatened and endangered species and their habitats, and none were identified. H&H also reviewed the National
Registry of Historic Places (NRHP) for Sites located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC
SHPO) GIS viewer; and the Site and surrounding area via visual reconnaissance for the potential presence of historic, cultural, and/or archeological
sites. No recorded sites were noted on or adjacent to the Site. H&H requested comment on the Site from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS),
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), and NC SHPO in November 2022. Agency responses are included in Appendix D.
To minimize Site impacts, the proposed installation plan was designed to avoid Waters of the US to the maximum extent practicable. The force main
installation will be conducted entirely within an existing easement, and no additional land area is required to facilitate this project. Furthermore, the force
main pipe will completely avoid crossings to SCA in the eastern portion of the Site and to Stewart Creek in the central portion of the Site. The force main
will be installed below an existing culvert located within SCA and will not result in additional impacts to SCA. The force main will be installed aerially on
existing piers in and near Stewart Creek and will not result in additional impacts to Stewart Creek. Only temporary impacts to SCB, SCD, and SCE are
required to facilitate the installation of the force main pipe. The only permanent impact proposed by the project is to SCE to install an emergency access
crossing, which will be used by Charlotte Water for maintenance and access throughout the easement as needed. The permanent impact is minimal and
only totals approximately 30 linear feet of stream impact. Furthermore, the force main pipe is needed by Charlotte Water in order to pump residuals and
backwash generated at the Vest WTP to the Franklin WTP for treatment where Charlotte Water has the greater capacity and technology to do so.
The force main will be installed using open -cut trench techniques within the streams and throughout the easement, and the streams will be restored to
pre -construction conditions and contours upon the completion of the installation. The restoration activities will be conducted in accordance with Charlotte
Water's design manual.
During Site development, good erosion and sediment control practices will be followed. Extensive silt fencing will be used on the construction Site
perimeter and along stream channels.
Mitigation
Mitigation is typically required by Nationwide Permit #58 for stream impacts greater than 0.02 acre. Although the proposed permanent stream impact
only totals approximately 0.007 acre, the Site is located within the 103 Watershed. Permanent impacts within the 103 Watershed which result in the loss
of jurisdictional waters typically require compensatory mitigation. Therefore, compensatory mitigation for the 30-linear foot (0.007-acre) impact to SCE is
proposed in the form of purchasing mitigation credits from the City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank. The Credit Reservation
Letter is attached in Appendix F. Based on the NC SAM, the stream quality of SCE is low. Based on the results of the NC SAM, the proposed mitigation
ratio for stream impact is 2:1.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Stream
Quantity:
60
3c. Comments
Permanent stream impacts total 30 linear feet which will require 60 credits at a 2:1 ratio from the City of Charlotte Umbrella Mitigation Bank.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 8
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
The Site is located within the Catawba River Basin, and the project does not propose impacts to the main -stem or the main -stem lakes of the Catawba River.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
This is a linear project with no built upon area and no additional impervious surfaces will be added.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments: *
The project is funded by Charlotte Water.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Additional phases and/or impacts to Waters of the US are not planned or proposed.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? *
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved? *
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS IPaC tool, DEQ Natural Heritage Program databases, and on -Site reconnaissance
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
The National Registry of Historic Places, the NC State Historic Preservation Office databases, and on -Site reconnaissance
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Additional impervious area is not proposed, and all impacted areas will be returned to pre -construction grades. The project involves the installation of a
primarily sub -grade force main pipe from the Vest WTP to the Franklin WTP. The proposed force main project is not expected to impact the floodplains
located on the Site.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Reviewed FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ID #3710454500K, 3710453500K, and 3710453600K
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Pre -Construction Notification - Vest to Franklin Force Main (SAW-2023-00273).pdf 10.76MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments

Signature O
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Danielle Clark
Signature
Date
3/9/2023

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2023-00273 Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Vest to Franklin Force Main Improvement Project
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and B3e]:
Charlotte Water is proposing a force main improvement project located within an existing easement that connects the Franklin Water
Treatment Plant (WTP) and the Vest WTP, and is seeking verification to use Nationwide Permit #58 to impact on -Site streams.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Charlotte Water (Applicant)
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Danielle Clark, PWS - Hart & Hickman, PC
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: None
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Linear easement connecting the Franklin WTP (5100 Brookshire Boulevard) and the Vest WTP (820
Beatties Ford Road) in Charlotte, NC (Lat/Long: 35.266232,-80.873313)
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: See Table 1
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information —Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Stewart Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03050103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 58
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

hart '� hickman
W
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Via Email
March 9, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Asheville Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Attention: Mr. Doug Perez
Re: Pre -Construction Notification
Force Main Improvement Project
Vest WTP to Franklin WTP
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
SAW-2023-00273
H&H Job No. CMU-428
Dear Doug
On behalf of Charlotte Water, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is submitting the attached Pre -
Construction Notification (PCN) for the proposed force main improvement project located
within an existing easement that connects the Franklin Water Treatment Plant (WTP) located at
5100 Brookshire Boulevard and the Vest WTP located at 820 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site). The Site consists primarily of a
maintained utility corridor owned by Charlotte Water and public rights -of -ways along roadways.
H&H is submitting this PCN application in order to receive verification to use Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 958 for the proposed force main improvement project.
H&H conducted a stream and wetlands survey at the Site on October 18 and 19, 2022. H&H
submitted a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) Asheville Regulatory Field Office on January 25, 2023 for approval. The
project was assigned Action ID SAW-2023-00273. On March 6, 2023, H&H received the PJD
for the Site from Mr. Doug Perez of the USACE Charlotte Regulatory Field Office. The PJD
document is included as Appendix E.
2923 5outh Tryon Street, 5uite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847A241 main

Mr. Doug Perez
March 9, 2023
Page 2
The following jurisdictional stream features were identified on the Site:
• Stream Channel "A" (SCA)
— perennial stream (approximately 32 linear feet)
• Stream Channel "B" (SCB)
— intermittent stream (approximately 31 linear feet)
• Stream Channel "C" (SCC)
— perennial stream (approximately 33 linear feet)
• Stream Channel "D" (SCD)
— intermittent stream (approximately 29 linear feet)
• Stream Channel "E" (SCE) —
perennial stream (approximately 65 linear feet)
SCC represents Stewart Creek. No jurisdictional wetland areas were identified on the Site.
This force main improvement project is needed by Charlotte Water to pump residuals and
backwash generated at the Vest WTP to the Franklin WTP for treatment where Charlotte Water
has the greater capacity and technology to do so. Charlotte Water is proposing to permanently
impact approximately 30 linear feet of SCE and to temporarily impact approximately 29 linear
feet of SCE. Charlotte Water is also proposing to temporarily impact approximately 30 linear
feet of SCB and approximately 30 linear feet of SCD. The permanent impact to SCE is proposed
to facilitate the installation of an emergency access crossing for maintenance and access
throughout the easement. The temporary impacts to SCB, SCD, and SCE are proposed to
facilitate the installation of the force main pipe through the easement via open cut installation
methods. Upon completion of the force main installation, temporarily impacted streams will be
restored to pre -construction conditions. Additional impacts to other on -Site streams are not
proposed. The force main crossing of SCA will be installed beneath an existing culvert located
within SCA that will not result in additional temporary or permanent impacts to SCA.
Furthermore, the force main pipe will be installed aerially on existing piers over Stewart Creek,
which will not result in additional temporary or permanent impacts to Stewart Creek.
Although the proposed permanent impact to SCE is less than the typical mitigation threshold for
NWP 458 of 0.02 acre of stream impacts in the Wilmington District, the Site is located within
hydrologic unit code 03050103 (103 Watershed). Due to the Site's location within the 103
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities - CMU/CMU400s
ContracUCMU428 Franklin to Vest Wetlands/Wetland Delineation/Permitting/02_Cover _letter.doc
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENV}RONMENTAL SOLUT ON5

Mr. Doug Perez
March 9, 2023
Page 3
Watershed, permanent impacts which result in the loss of jurisdictional waters typically require
compensatory mitigation. Therefore, mitigation for the permanent stream impact is proposed via
the City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank. Based on the North
Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM), the stream quality of SCE is low. Based on the
results of the NC SAM, the proposed mitigation ratio for the stream impact is 2:1.
Compensatory stream mitigation is not required or proposed for the temporary stream impacts.
H&H is seeking a Nationwide Permit 958 verification for this force main improvement project.
A copy of the PCN submittal package has also been submitted to the North Carolina Department
of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources (DEQ DWR) via the ePCN.
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities - CMU/CMU400s
ContracUCMU428 Franklin to Vest Wetlands/Wetland Delineation/Permitting/02_Cover _letter.doc
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUT)ON5

Mr. Doug Perez
March 9, 2023
Page 4
Should you have questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact Danielle
Clark at 518-598-2862.
Very truly yours,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Danielle Clark, PWS
Sr. Project Environmental Scientist
Attachments
d�
Julia McGuire
Asst. Project Environmental Scientist
• PCN Form
• Figure 1— Site Location Map
• Figure 2 — Proposed Force Main Easement Route and Summary of Waters of the US
• Figure 3 — Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map — Northwest Area
• Figure 4 — Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map — Central Area
• Figure 5 — Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map — Southeast Area
• Appendix A — Agent Authorization
• Appendix B — Vest Residuals & Backwash Force Main to Franklin WTP prepared by Black &
Veatch dated February 2023
• Appendix C — Avoidance & Minimization
• Appendix D — Supplemental Documents
• Appendix E — Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
• Appendix F — Mitigation Credit Reservation Letter
• Appendix G — NC SAM Form
cc: Mr. Justin Webster, PE, Charlotte Water (via email)
Mr. Michael P. Galin, Black and Veatch (via email)
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities - CMU/CMU400s
ContracUCMU428 Franklin to Vest Wetlands/Wetland Delineation/Permitting/02_Cover _letter.doc
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENV}RONMENTAL SOLUTSON5

Pre -Construction Notification
Force Main Improvement Project
SAW-2023-00273
Vest WTP to Franklin WTP
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. CMU-428
March 9, 2023
hart � hickman
ky►►MAIli4:i4 Li►lI*QILIIITIN01kv&lfe]UIIWOV
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd , Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919,847.4241 main

W a rE�v�
T.
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 58 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Vest WTP to Franklin WTP Force Main Improvement Project
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Easement held by Charlotte Water
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Refer to attached Table 1 for individual parcel/owner information
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Project Developer
4b.
Name:
Justin Webster, PE
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Charlotte Water
4d.
Street address:
5100 Brookshire Boulevard
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28216
4f.
Telephone no.:
980-312-2768
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Danielle Clark, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Hart & Hickman, PC
5c.
Street address:
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
see Table 1
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.266232 Longitude:-80.873313
1 c.
Property size:
12 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Stewart Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C (Stewart Creek Classification)
2c.
River basin:
Catawba
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Site consists of an existing easement owned and operated by Charlotte Water that connects the Franklin WTP located at 5100 Brookshire
Boulevard and the Vest WTP located at 820 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The Site consists primarily of a
maintained utility corridor and public rights -of -ways along roadways.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 202
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The force main improvement project involves the installation of a 16-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) force main to transport residuals and backwash from the
Vest WTP to the Franklin WTP for treatment.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The
project will utilize heavy equipment to install the force main pipe.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments:
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
pJD issued by the Corps on 3/6/2023
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑X preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Hart & Hickman, PC
Name (if known): Julia McGuire
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or
State determinations and attach documentation.
The
Corps conducted a desktop review and a PJD was issued by Doug Perez on
3/6/2023 (SAW-2023-00273).
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
Not applicable
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill
SCE
PER
Corps
10
30
S2 T
Open -Cut Trench
SCE
PER
Corps
10
29
S3 T
Open -Cut Trench
SCB
INT
Corps
4.5
30
S4 T
Open -Cut Trench
SCD
INT
Corps
4.5
30
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
119
3i. Comments:
The permanent stream impact involves the installation of an emergency access crossing. The temporary stream impacts involve open -cut trenching to
install the force main pipe. Upon completion of the force main installation, the temporary stream impacts will be restored to pre -construction conditions.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Not Applicable
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
p1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
Not Applicable
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Not Applicable
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Appendix C
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See Appendix C
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑X Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank: City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 60
Quantity:
Quantity:
Permanent stream impacts total 30 If w is wi require credits at a ratio trom the City of Charlotte Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Not applicable
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Not applicable.
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This is a linear project with no built upon area and no additional impervious
surfaces will be
added.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Charlotte
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other: Phase I
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Additional phases and/or impacts to Waters of the U.S. are not planned or proposed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not applicable
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes 0 No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS IPaC tool and DEQ Natural Heritage Program databases, and on -Site reconnaissance (See information in Appendix D).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes 0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The National Registry of Historic Places and NC State Historic Preservation Office databases and on -site reconnaissance (See
information in Appendix D).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
0 Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Additional impervious area is not proposed, and all impacted areas will be returned to pre -construction grades. The project involves the installation of a
primarily sub -grade force main pipe from Franklin WTP to Vest WTP. The proposed force main project is not expected to impact the floodplains
located on the site.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Reviewed FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ID #3710454500K, 3710453500K, and 3710453600K
bax,�J U
Danielle Clark
J
'
03-08-2023
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Charlotte
Reservoir
�
Y
3 AVE
ani•E
SITE
,yaw'
S;s: ..�•:
'�
•�
- H[.l[i1 1r
..
-_ .ALL.. ♦
1
,illik�r ,{.1t1:� 0
17e1, ,M1,•,
�,.,A
P r
{ n
A
�_
t --�
USGS The National Map: National Bounda i Dataset, 3DEP Elevation
Program, Geographic Names Information Syst�e , National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, Nation III tructures Dataset, and
National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census
Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S.
Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National
Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data
refreshed May, 2020. ,
!1
0 2,000 4,000
N
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
DERITA, MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE,
CHARLOTTE WEST AND CHARLOTTE EAST,
NORTH CAROLINA 2019
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)

L
f„ ^• S ��/alp i� - F ^ - �^
' FRANKLIN k.
WATER
TREATMENT PLANT
' . yew � � � }�•. $; _ r�
Tw
a
i l4,41
r
•�� .� .t v� �'tie,
bib
vp
1 �f.
• , �r
�` R ''•
h
/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,' _
15
IRK '-Nr7q* %
C• r
0
VEST
WATER
TREATMENT PLANT
LEGEND
SITE BOUNDARY (CHARLOTTE WATER EASEMENT)
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL LENGTH
STREAM CHANNEL ID
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (LF)
STREAM CHANNEL "A" (SCA)
32 (PERENNIAL)
STREAM CHANNEL "B" (SCB)
31 (INTERMITTENT)
STREAM CHANNEL "C" (SCC)
33 (PERENNIAL)
STREAM CHANNEL "D" (SCD)
29 INTERMITTENT
STREAM CHANNEL "E" (SCE)
65 PERENNIAL
STREAM TOTAL
202
"'REFER TO FIGURES 3 TO 5 FOR STREAM CHANNEL LOCATIONS
NOTES:
1. LF - LINEAR FEET
WA - WETLAND AREA
2. DELINEATION COMPLETED BY H&H ON 10/18/22
& 10/19/22.
3. SIZE AND LOCATIONS OF SITE FEATURES ARE
APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTAINED USING
A TRIMBLE GPS UNIT.
4. SITE BOUNDARY OBTAINED FROM CONSTRUCTION
PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED EASEMENT
5. PLEASE NOTE THAT STREAM LENGTHS NOTED ABOVE
ARE APPROXIMATELY EQUIVALENT TO THE EASEMENT
WIDTH IN THE LOCATION WHERE THE STREAM
CHANNEL CROSSES THE EASEMENT
qw
APPROXIMATE
0 1,000 2,000
iiia
SCALE IN FEET
ITLE
Proposed Force Main Easement Route and Summary of Waters of the US
'ROJECT FORCE MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
FRANKLIN TO VEST
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street, Ste. 100
hart "w- hiekman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
0- 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (0
5MARTfl ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
DATE: 11/29/2022 REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO: CMU-428 FIGURE NO. 2

FRANKLIN ��I
WATER
TREATMENT PLANT
e r-K
re/4
-� ipp
I
O
*
LEGEND
_ i�ti •
r
SITE BOUNDARY (CHARLOTTE WATER EASEMENT)
- H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
INTERMITTENT STREAM
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
N
-
�
PERENNIAL STREAM
s>
�w TEST PIT
to
m
- .79
L R�
and the GIS User
f
NOTES:
1. LF - LINEAR FEET
WA- WETLAND AREA
2. DELINEATION COMPLETED BY H&H ON 10/18/22
& 10/19/22.
3. SIZE AND LOCATIONS OF SITE FEATURES ARE
ii APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTAINED USING
k- ATRIMBLE GPS UNIT.
4. FLAGGED BOUNDARIES OF FEATURES ARE SUBJECT
TO THE REVIEW OF A US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE AND MAY BE ALTERED DURINGA
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SITE VISIT, WHICH
COULD CHANGE SIZES AND/OR LOCATIONS OF
FEATURES.
5. PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2021. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2021.
APPROXIMATE
0 400 800
iiia
SCALE IN FEET
TITLE
PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION MAP - NORTHWESTAREA
PROJECT FORCE MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
FRANKLIN TO VEST
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street, Ste. 100
hart "'%. hickman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
w 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f7
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL 5OLUTkONS License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
DATE: 12/5/2022 REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO: CMU-428 FIGURE NO. 3

LEGEND
—SITE BOUNDARY (CHARLOTTE WATER EASEMENT)
_H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
PERENNIAL STREAM
NOTES:
1. LF - LINEAR FEET
WA - WETLAND AREA
2. DELINEATION COMPLETED BY H&H ON 10/18/22
& 10/19/22.
3. SIZE AND LOCATIONS OF SITE FEATURES ARE
APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTAINED USING
A TRIMBLE GPS UNIT.
4. FLAGGED BOUNDARIES OF FEATURES ARE SUBJECT
TO THE REVIEW OF A US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE AND MAY BE ALTERED DURING A
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SITE VISIT, WHICH
COULD CHANGE SIZES AND/OR LOCATIONS OF
FEATURES.
5. PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2021. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2021.
Qw
APPROXIMATE
0 400 800
iiia
SCALE IN FEET
TITLE
PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION MAP - CENTRALAREA
PROJECT FORCE MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
FRANKLIN TO VEST
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street, Ste. 100
hart "'%. hickman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
w 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f7
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL 50LUMNS License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
DATE: 11/29/2022 REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO: CMU-428 FIGURE NO. 4

IWO
1
I
4&
VEST WATER
TREATMENT PLANT
the
LEGEND
SITE BOUNDARY (CHARLOTTE WATER EASEMENT)
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
INTERMITTENT STREAM
r H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
■"' PERENNIAL STREAM
NOTES:
1. LF - LINEAR FEET
WA - WETLAND AREA
2. DELINEATION COMPLETED BY H&H ON 10/18/22
& 10/19/22.
3. SIZE AND LOCATIONS OF SITE FEATURES ARE
APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTAINED USING
A TRIMBLE GPS UNIT.
4. FLAGGED BOUNDARIES OF FEATURES ARE SUBJECT
TO THE REVIEW OF A US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE AND MAY BE ALTERED DURING A
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SITE VISIT, WHICH
COULD CHANGE SIZES AND/OR LOCATIONS OF
FEATURES.
5. PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2021. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2021.
J Qw
N
APPROXIMATE
0 400 800
iiia
SCALE IN FEET
TITLE
R PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION MAP - SOUTHEASTAREA
PROJECT FORCE MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
FRANKLIN TO VEST
t CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
a -4 2923 South Tryon Street, Ste. 100
hart "'%. hickman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
w 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL 5OLUTkONS License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
DATE: 11/29/2022 REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO: CMU-428 FIGURE NO. 5

Appendix A
Agent Authorization
hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Agent Certification of Authorization
1 Justin Webster , representing the Owner, Charlotte Water, of the Franklin to Vest
Force Main project located within the existing easement that connects the Franklin Water
Treatment Plant located at 5100 Brookshire Boulevard and the Vest Water Treatment Plant located
at 820 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, certify that I have
authorized Hart & Hickman, PC to act on the Owner's behalf and take all actions necessary to the
processing, issuance, and acceptance of a Delineation Concurrence and 404/401 permitting for this
project, if needed.
Owner's Signature
Name/Title:
Company:
01 /13/2023
Date
Justin Webster, PE
Charlotte Water
5100 Brookshire Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28216
[e-mail]
980-312-2768
Agent's Signature
Danielle Clark, PWS
Hart & Hickman, PC
01-13-2023
Date

Appendix B
Vest Residuals & Backwash Force Main to Franklin WTP prepared by Black & Veatch
dated February 2023
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

�m
LOz
M ail
tp _ C
Ava-
Qso� o
4_ -0
' C-101
C-103
C-102
16" DIP FM ALIGNMENT
C-104 �# 500' 250' 0 500' 1000,
C105 � � HORIZONTAL SCALE 1"=500'
T-105 LE rLr a GENERAL NOTES.
1. FLOW IS PUMPED FROM VEST WTP TO FRANKLIN WTP.
' C_ 1 06 _ 'h STATIONING OF PIPING IS FROM WEST TO EAST ( LEFT TO
ti �
4' \ �� RIGHT), FRANKLIN WTP TO VEST WTP.
C 107
%+L III. J eft
ir - �• _L SHEET KEYNOTES.
• i� _ ,.o Q6: ' Ig 1 1 1. FRANKLIN WATER TREATMENT PLANT
LjF��-Crl�` a 2. LAWTON ROAD
� � � � � �� � 3 CSX RAILROAD
o
69 .,
q6..
i-w
r 3 �- c
f C-109 UNIVERSITY PAR
4. NORTH HOSKINS ROAD
'--I
5. NCDOT 1-85 INTERSTATE
tip' o. \ r� } 6. STEWART CREEK
` 7. BEATTIES FORD ROAD
. g . 8. VEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT
- _ T-110 •ti 0- ngrCrl3rdt .5,
C-111' rr
` \ 6
E R R I L-;�ell
-
�\
C-112
C rcp Ci
f °' A �
C-113 .3 w '
� �,M .4 L
.�
_5
FW
Ill�_1�
� \ --F
C-114
4I
gyp`
C-116I.
A C-115
rA
C-117 .
' C-1 18
�- 3
12)
•P ar
. `�A- &
liz C �I-120 - .
13
_ u LM C-121
•,� ti a C-001 IA PUw-'Yx-l.
A a © 2023 Mlcrosott Corporation © 2022 TomTom 1 '6:-
aBLACK & VEATCH
Black & Veatch International Company
Business License No. F-0794
10925 David Taylor Drive, Suite 280
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
SENSITIVE
DOCUMENTS
CHARLOTTE
WATER I
VEST RESIDUALS &
BACKWASH FORCE MAIN
TO FRANKLIN WTP
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE
DESIGNED:
MPG, JRG
DETAILED:
SPS
CHECKED:
DLC
APPROVED:
KJM
DATE:
FEBRUARY 2023
PROJECT NO.:
193725
CIVIL
16-INCH FORCE MAIN -
PLAN OVERVIEW
07
C-010 OF
47
(SCALE BAR IS 4" AT FULL SCALE) 0 1 /2 1 2 3 4

2 m
o Z
Y
N �
co O
co
N
o
N a-
N U
45° HORZ BEN
E:1437472.36
\ 6, — \ t 22.5° HC
\ O N:56115�
E:14374f
22.5° HORZ BEND �R
\ \ N:561160.31 A
j 1 E:1437446.32� ��
\ l � C-801
UTILITY EASEMENT
O
�TH-
BOULDER
DEMOLISH, DISPOSE, (rD3
\ W TH-3A \\
CLEAR, AND GRUB \ \�
TREES AND BRUSH (TYP) \ � .. 24 4
790
785
780
775
770
765
760
755
750
745
740
735
730
725
720
715
710
705
700
25+00
\ 13"
FMq 12, -
o T
R co cy �,
Nr,N
vg7'r0N
sF 25*00\
C_ 1
02
45° HORZ BEND
N::561019 08�
E:1437856.48
18"
\ 2�O zo" \
EXIST 8 VCP SS �o \
\� �`\ \ C`� 0\8"
45° HORZ BEND
_N: 561023.36
\\
10, 0 10, 20'
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=10'
40' 20' 0 40' 80,
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 =40
QBLACK & VEATCH
Black & Veatch International Company
Business License No. F-0794
10925 David Taylor Drive, Suite 280
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
SENSITIVE
DOCUMENTS
'0" 'y�NU6AIL � �' GENERAL NOTES.
1 /
o o1 1 /� / I � L � ^ o � � Off` 1. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER SHALL BE 3 FEET IN EASEMENTS
16" DIP FM 16" X 6" TEE E'er \ \ U0 C / AND ALL NON -PAVED AREAS. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER
15 / l
N: 560977.90 l \ "x�0 �O X4j SHALL BE 4 FEET IN ALL PAVED AREAS.
E. 1437722.32 I INSTALL 6" DIP FM L ��
/ \ Cb 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE PER DRAWING
OD
Il \ C-801 DETAIL A & B WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AS
7 ~\ REQUIRED FOR PROPER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
Cj OR AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.
w
QO r EXIST 36" PCCP FW
a \ \ 1A
F
w ERRAw \7\ 0 UTILITY EASEMENTS �\
4jRRAW W O 45° HORZ BEND PO
N.560943.50 W\ O / Cj
E 1437675.38 \ �` F / \ 0
r,++ rI DE G \ f� 'cO
EXIST 8" VCP SS ) EA 45° HORZ BEND �\ W\ to\ \\
\ C N:560944.56 \ T \ Dk FO CHARLOTTE
E, 437664.92 � � W )�
SHEET KEYNOTES:
2 W � will,
TER
,EXIST 24" CIP RW W /
/gyp 1. CONTRACTOR MAY USE FRANKLIN WTP ACCESS GATE ALONG
I EXIST 30" CIP RW CORRIDOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISRUPT CHARLOTTE
/ WATER PLANT OPERATIONS.
2. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON NORTHWEST SIDE OF
STREAM SO TO NOT LET SEDIMENT ENTER STREAM.
af +I
+1
't
U N co
M
60
o-
cfl NU—
ao
M
N
� � 00
N J—C
I— Uj +
_ co
~
W
` ' N
U +Ico
� U � co co
~ coati
�XO
(nW
QS2a
I—
��� �, M
+zo O 1-
�w0
OUP
�MJ coLr,-z >
N (n a 5 00 > 0 0 J
\
HXO N0,1) z C0I—w
(n CY) Q U
w 1- >
w CnLuZ_
z
\
APPROX. EXISTING
GRADE
16" DIP F
\
\
�z
0
uJ z z z
m o w � w ,n w
- z
co
---_----___
--
/
0
Ln _ 00 00
M° M � m
o o
Ln N I ti LO r °o T Lfi
N N
+ + (0 +
r N N
\
N _ N N Q O_N N
�w �O (j0= �O
p
(n > 0) 2 (n 2
o
w T o
w � z
Z O m z w W
m
r o
� N ° MCO L0 Ln
M
—
00 0)N Ong + N
NN
Q � Q � N � (n r oM N
00
C1
(~n II~_ �O �O
(n 2
Mw �w
N
w
(n =
m m
m
a� a�
+r
�O I__ 0—
CO
07= cn=
Q�
U)
>
850 LF OF 16" RJDIP
25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00
790
785
780
775
770
765
760
755
750
745
740
735
730
725
720
715
710
705
700
33+50
3. TREES WITH DIAMETERS LESS THAN APPROXIMATELY 6" ARE
NOT SHOWN. TREES WITH DIAMETERS LESS THAN 16" ARE
NOT LABELED UNLESS TO BE DEMOLISHED AND DISPOSED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH, DISPOSE, CLEAR, & GRUB
ALL TREES AND BRUSH WITHIN 15 FT OF EACH SIDE OF
ALIGNMENT AND AS INDICATED. MAJOR TREES HAVE BEEN
IDENTIFIED TO BE DEMOLISHED AND DISPOSED.
DEMOLISH AND DISPOSE:
ONE (1) - 18" TREE FOUR (4) - 10" TREES
SEVEN (7) - 13" TREES ONE (1) - 6" TREE
THREE (3) - 12" TREES TWO (2) - 8" TREES
4. TREES WITH DIAMETERS LESS THAN APPROXIMATELY 6" ARE
NOT SHOWN. TREES WITH DIAMETERS LESS THAN 16" ARE
NOT LABELED UNLESS TO BE DEMOLISHED AND DISPOSED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH, DISPOSE, CLEAR, & GRUB
ALL TREES AND BRUSH WITHIN 15 FT OF EACH SIDE OF
ALIGNMENT AND AS INDICATED. MAJOR TREES HAVE BEEN
IDENTIFIED TO BE DEMOLISHED AND DISPOSED. DEMOLISH
AND DISPOSE:
ONE (1) - 24" DIA TREES FOUR (4)- 6" DIA TREES
ONE (1) - 20" DIA TREE THREE (3) - 7" DIA TREES
THREE (3) - 15" DIA TREES FOUR (4) - 8" DIA TREES
TWO (2) - 14" DIA TREES ONE (1) - 9" DIA TREE
FOUR (4) - 13" DIA TREES FOUR (4) - 10" DIA TREES
FOUR (4)-12" DIA TREES
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL CUT, FILL, AND INSTALL ACCEPTABLE
VEST RESIDUALS &
BACKWASH FORCE MAIN
TO FRANKLIN WTP
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OFFSITE BACKFILL AS NEEDED TO SLOPE STREAM BANK AS
REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE
DESIGNED: MPG, JRG
NECESSARY TO INSTALL PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING AND
ALLOW VEHICLE ACCESS.
DETAILED: SPS
6. ARMORFLEX8 (OR EQUAL) ROAD WIDTH SHALL BE NOMINAL
WIDTH OF 16 FT. RIPRAP SHALL EXTEND BEYOND EACH SIDE
CHECKED: DLC
APPROVED: KJM
DATE: FEBRUARY 2023
OF ROAD AS INDICATED IN PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
PROJECT NO.: 193725
DETAIL.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 16"x6" REDUCING TEE AND
INSTALL 6" DIP FROM TEE TO EXISTING SS MANHOLE
(MH-378848). INSTALL TEE WITH BRANCH ON BOTTOM WITH 90
DEGREE BEND. INSTALL 6" GATE VALVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL
CORE DRILL MANHOLE TO INSTALL 6" DIP TO MATCH CROWNS
WITH THE EFFLUENT SS LINE. GROUT ANNULAR SPACE
CIVIL
BETWEEN 6" DIP AND MANHOLE.
8. CONTRACTOR CAN REMOVE AND REPLACE CHAIN LINK FENCE
AS NEEDED TO PERFORM WORK AND MAY USE EXISTING
DOUBLE SWING GATE OFF OF WORTH PL WHEN PERFORMING
WORK. SECURITY SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES.
16-INCH DIP FORCE MAIN -
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING AND INSTALL NEW
PLAN & PROFILE STA
CHAIN LINK FENCE AND GATE FROM WEST CORNER POST
ALONG NORTH FENCELINE AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL CHAIN
25+00 TO 33+50
LINK FENCE AND GATE SUCH THAT THE CENTER OF THE GATE
IS CENTERED ON THE PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
ARMORFLEX ROAD.
LU
00
0 0
w o
0 J Dr
4_ LL LL 0
INote: Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from Microsoft Corporation. Aerial imagery provided by Bing Maps, © 2020
Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS, Bing
(SCALE BAR IS 4" AT FULL SCALE) 0 1 /2 1
2 3 4
12
C-103 OF
47

v�
RIM=715.62'
INV.=709.56'-IN(NW) N/F
INV.=709.54'-IN(SW)
PLAINWOOD. LLC
INV.=708.56'-OUT(SE) DBPD403904 01207
N/F ZONED
NO SITE ADDRESS
j SEABOARD COAST LINE I TENNESSEE AVE.
�� RAILWAY COMPANY
UN72O/KNOWN DEED REFERENCE
M.B
PD2390491141
ZONED 1-2
601 N. HOSKINS RD.
730
�\ A SILT FENCE
\ \\ \ I C-801 (TYP)
EXIST 12" PVC TO VC P SS \\\ I I ` 1 \ I / / I r 22.50 HORZ BEND /
I / / I Nm55920915 /
0
f \ \ \ l l ( EXIST 36" PCCP FW WOODEU 36" PCCP FW I
' ( AREA TOP EL 740.3± E:1439092.71 / WOODED
TI �� \ \`\\ I \\ \\\\ \�\ 1 \ I \ I ' I I TOP EL 721.5± , ,n� 1 / / / & N: 559314.88
O _ S \ 1 \ \ 1 I WOOD) \ \ Lo I ` N: 559459.11 E: 1439014.28
`\\ \ \ l 1I o I \ E. 1438895.70 / -h -
1 \ 1 11I �„" \ \ 1 lLIA�IT� / / LIMIT OF C14ti J N \ \ \ i L O
UTILITY EASEMENT��� xP �� PIPE �cposE PI J / I ` 1 I ��% "', 0 -
O No\ =718. s' T16P EttV.=7,� 7' \ \ l \ LO LOD D
Z D ( / 0\\� I OD — W
i \ I \ 1 OQ - LO sTH• 57 ./ 55+00 , S
X
I
m" \` �� D _ 53+00 1WI _ 54+00 64p ., 111 E f�
_ \ \' J, 52 00 W ( _ I P AINWOOD D1{.
W 51+O0 LOo- 1 40• PULO
B IC RIGHT- -WAY
L / LOB LOD I \ ` \ \ M.B. 38�777
z ���p 50+00 T \ LOD LOD \ \\ \ I \I
_ l
O m O LOD I I / J J/ ��\ I �\ \\ \ \ CONTRACTOR SHALL'FIELD VERIFY
z LOD L\�\ \ ti \� < \ UTILITY EASEMENT. // \ \ \� 36" PCCP ALIGNMENT AND ROUTE
(n \ \ I 1 ( (( / I �J, \ \\\\ \ 16" DIP FM TO AVOID TREES 22.5° HORZ BEND
mD AREA \ \ \1\111 1 l�\\\ \ .ice. � / �� \ \J — � 1 \ N:559146.93
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING \ \ �I �i:� yd INSTALL 16" DIP FM �\ \ \ ; ^\ \ \ E:1439086.57
\ APPROX. STREAM IMPACT LENGTH: 30' ✓ �o.-OUT �� WOODED / \\_ — J I \ I
i AREA � � � 11.25° HORZ BEND
Cn\ \ APPROX. MAX. WIDTH OF DISTURBANCE: 11.5' 1 ( I r� \ I I I N:559112.48
p I I I
A �� APPROX. IMPACT AREA: 286 SQ FT TEMPORARY STREAM N/F
/ �� Y PAY \ rro I I E:1439097.00
CROSSING U N DEED REF NC
N__,601,`o� s
Cil �) / ti �� X. o s s1 „ III ( UTILITY EASEMENT
EXIST 30 CI RW
—� �N SHR D.B. 220P RPICES.71`0
M.B. 14. PG, 115
ZONED ID0390441255D(CD)
4350 BROOKSHIRE BLVD.
UTILITY EASEMENT
NF
SEABOARD COAST LINE
RAILWAY COMPANY
UNKNOWN DEED REFERENCE
M.B. 22. PG. 241
PID ZONED
I- 11 /
\\ 601 N. OSKI S RD.
775
770
765
760
755
750
745
740
735
730
725
720
715
710
705
700
695
690
685
49+50
N/F
DEBRA L. LEGETTE
D.B. 17707, PG. 96`
M.B. 41• PG. 41
PID 3904975
ZONED R-5
4152 TENNESSEE f
I
-/ O
� O V
,�. O ON
1 STORY
BRICK
RESIDENCE
c
rA
U)
0-
0
O
�0+I
o
> oo
/
+
/
w z
APPROX.
EXISTING GRADE
_
16
o
z
\
z m
o
-
/
Lu T O
0 m IUD
\
\
EXPOSED EXISTING
/
N m + N LO N
\
36" PCCP FW
/
°+° Q N O
Ln
O
/ J
I < O U)
o
U _
_M
I
00
I
�g
it
0 0
Z. z Z
w- LU
�N�N�N�N
U.)�L�L0�Lf)�
aQ¢X¢0�
cco>U)> U)>U)>
128 LF OF 16" F JDIP
65 LF OF 16" RJDIP
50+00 50+50 51+00 51+50 52+00 52+50 53+00 53+50 54+00 54+50 55+00 55+50 56+00 56+50
INote: Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from Microsoft Corporation. Aerial imagery provided by Bing Maps, © 2020
Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS, Bing
775
770
765
760
755
750
745
740
735
730
725
720
715
710
705
700
695
690
685
57+00
10, 0 10, 20'
VERTICAL SCALE 1 "=10'
40' 20' 0 40' 80,
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 "=40'
GENERAL NOTES
1. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER SHALL BE 3 FEET IN EASEMENTS
AND ALL NON -PAVED AREAS. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER
SHALL BE 4 FEET IN ALL PAVED AREAS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE PER DRAWING C-801
DETAIL A & B WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AS REQUIRED
FOR PROPER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL OR AS
INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT AS
NEEDED TO INSTALL PIPING PER DRAWING C-902 DETAIL C,
UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL, WITH CITY INSPECTOR, DISCOVER AND
FIELD VERIFY MATERIAL OF SERVICE LINES ALONG
ALIGNMENT CORRIDOR ACCORDING TO THE GENERAL NOTES
ON G-001. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REPORT AS
INDICATED IN GENERAL NOTES AND REPLACE SERVICE LINES
AS INDICATED IN THE GENERAL NOTES.
0. BLACK & VEATCH
Black & Veatch International Company
Business License No. F-0794
10925 David Taylor Drive, Suite 280
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
SENSITIVE
DOCUMENTS
CHARLOTTE
WATER
VEST RESIDUALS &
BACKWASH FORCE MAIN
TO FRANKLIN WTP
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE
DESIGNED:
MPG, JRG
DETAILED:
SPS
CHECKED:
DLC
APPROVED:
KJM
DATE:
FEBRUARY 2023
PROJECT NO.:
193725
CIVIL
16-INCH DIP FORCE MAIN -
PLAN & PROFILE STA
49+50 TO 57+00
15
C-106 OF
47
(SCALE BAR IS 4" AT FULL SCALE) 0 1 /2 1 2 3 4

N z
0 Y
M �
>O
co
N
o
N EL
N U
M'y
�a
Q44J
_
C't) CO
O
W 115.
�O
0
C.)
/L <'
675 J�_J
-/0 l
UTILITY EASEMENT
710
705
700
695
690
685
680
675
670
665
660
655
650
645
640
635
630
625
620
M.B. 6, PG. 421
PID 06907116
ZONED R-4
NO SITE ADDRESS
4 \
\ I \
STEWART CREEK NOT IMPACTED.
PIPING TO BE INSTALLED AERIAL ON 1
EXISTING PIERS
I
N/F
A ARI A
I D.B. 325 PG, 215
M.B. 3, PG. 311)
PID 06911
/ ZONED R-5
NO SITE ADORES
CEIIA �AVE. 6 \
19
-7
T-7 P
364�3Q. LPG. 354
Sin
A I
n
\
O
O�
n
G r
H-25A
Q
4G
G^,) cr
1 STORY V - O
< OD
(Q RE CE `
tQ\\
F / �
P
N/F/ J
D. P 6 5. 892
M.B. PG. 10
\ PID 0770
"1 7 D -5
17 CELIA
0
10
710
705
700
695
690
685
680
675
670
665
660
655
650
645
640
635
630
625
620
114+50 115+00 115+50 116+00 116+50 117+00 117+50 118+00 118+50 119+00 119+50 120+00 120+50 121+00 121+50
APPROX. EXISTING GRADE
(TYP)
1
EXISTING PIERS (TYP)
172 LF OF EXPOSED 16" DIP FM
PIPE SUPPORT DETAIL SEE C-900
Wa0
ep 60
0�
0
0)
U
F
I-
Oq
r—
W +I
U C7
U)
U +I —�
� N �
- nj (NI
N>Q
+
° (D
M
ti
o-N N
r` ti
Ln(O(p
Z Z
r
>
N _j
I-J
W
00
��J—;NONO->>>
= Q0 6)
ti~ Z
��
Q
QU)
�X
��W
a->
�C\j
Q
U)_j
U
CID
Wz
U)Wz
Wg
E'6 �
2
650 LF OF 16" RJDIP
EO �
�
—
U
Na- +I
C) U
a-
>
-LO �—O
N-LO N —
U
+ �
c+oI
I °O(o
+
L+
C:)LO"i—
CD CO z
O
Fj J
I—>Uj
N CO J
��W
�co(0zz—axwo
�xo
H
= W -
(A W cn I—
fA W I—
Un
2
INSTALL AIR RELEASE
MANHOLE AT HIGH POINT
---1------ -
0
In z
�W
0
z
lo_
0
Z
LnZ
00 CO
ai 00
W
W
+ L0
LLO
Lr)
m
LO
Ln
m
o
00
H IV +
N
+
CDIN
0
(0
ILD
N
O
N
N
U)
~
O
�N
O
co
Q
Qf
Cn
:
I
�0
10, 0 10, 20'
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=10'
40' 20' 0 40' 80,
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 "=40'
GENERAL NOTES-
1. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER SHALL BE 3 FEET IN EASEMENTS
AND ALL NON -PAVED AREAS. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER SHALL
BE 4 FEET IN ALL PAVED AREAS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE PER DRAWING C-801
DETAIL A & B WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AS REQUIRED
FOR PROPER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL OR AS
INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT AS
NEEDED TO INSTALL PIPING PER DRAWING C-902 DETAIL C,
UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL, WITH CITY INSPECTOR, DISCOVER AND
FIELD VERIFY MATERIAL OF SERVICE LINES ALONG ALIGNMENT
CORRIDOR ACCORDING TO THE GENERAL NOTES ON G-001.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REPORT AS INDICATED IN
GENERAL NOTES AND REPLACE SERVICE LINES AS INDICATED
IN THE GENERAL NOTES.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL DUAL WRAP 16" DIP FM ACCORDING TO
GENERAL NOTES WHERE ALIGNMENT CROSSES METALLIC GAS
LINES.
0. BLACK & VEATCH
Black & Veatch International Company
Business License No. F-0794
10925 David Taylor Drive, Suite 280
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
SENSITIVE
DOCUMENTS
CHARLOTTE
WATER
VEST RESIDUALS &
BACKWASH FORCE MAIN
TO FRANKLIN WTP
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SHEET KEYNOTES-
1 . INSTALL 16" DIP FM AND PIPE SUPPORT ON EXISTING TEN (10)
PIERS FOR 36" FW ON EITHER SIE OF STEWART CREEK PER
DRAWING S-900 DETAIL A.
2. INSTALL 16" DIP FM AND PIPE SUPPORT ON EXISTING TWO (2)
PIERS FOR 36" FW CROSSING STEWART CREEK PER DRAWING
S-900 DETAIL B.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE SOIL AROUND PIERS AS NEEDED
TO INSTALL PIPE SUPPORTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE CARE
TO NOT DAMAGE EXISTING PIERS.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROPER E&SC IN ORDER TO
PROTECT STEWART CREEK WHEN INSTALLING PIPE SUPPORTS
AND AERIAL CROSSING.
REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE
DESIGNED: MPG, JRG
DETAILED: SPSCHECKED:
DLC
APPROVED: KJM
DATE: FEBRUARY 2023
PROJECT NO.: 193725
CIVIL
16-INCH DIP FORCE MAIN -
PLAN & PROFILE STA
114+50 TO 121 +50
23
C-114 OF
47
LU
00
0 0
w o
0 J Dr
EL LL LL 0
INote: Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from Microsoft Corporation. Aerial imagery provided by Bing Maps, © 2020
Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS, Bing
(SCALE BAR IS 4" AT FULL SCALE) 0 1 /2 1 2 3 4

LU
J
LL
0
0_
0
z
a
Z
J
IL
� m
z
o Y
>0
co
N
o
N a
N U
N/F
I BETTY RUTH BAUKNIGHT \ . N\
D.B. 9410, PG. 293 .OUNTY \�
/ M.B. 2095. PG. N/F
/ PID 06909451 D.B. 40, Pb^676 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
ZONEDR-5 \ / N/F PID 06909408/\ D.B. B. 3, PC. 1
M.B. 4 PG. . 6
26
N 2913 R TON ST, �6ULLETT \ D R-5 _ L 069094t0 N I
cP 2 TT TT 0 E 'DDFFE55 `� N/~- - Np ZONE ADDRESS \ I MECKLENBURG COUNTY
\ �?? / MECKI F_NAhRC. COI IMTY
_ D.B. 19t3. PG. 34 q f CEL AVE. �� D.B. 37740. PG. 626
61 `7 ��. B. 33340, PG. 626 EUI. M.B. 3, PG. 301
M.Br3TPG. . �- M.B. 3, G. 307� ,g PID 06909411
JF' A SILT FENCE R K .�Pz6 004 R45i°� ��� y—� �_ — Ra 069D94o9 \
\ ZONED R-5 BONED R-5
C-801 - TYP B. aot�� NO-311E f3S _ lNO SITE ADDR \\ \T NO S: E ADD(tE55
.D I CEL A
I � ( )��PID 0O0940r�. •-C'E/LIA/�AV�s _ /CEUA AVE.
ONED R-5 �Q
TRA I R 33��p TH 14 EXIST 36" PCCP FW �
\I \� MaA AVE.
D6904452� �CEU��_� - _
710
705
700
695
690
685
680
675
670
665
660
655
650
645
640
635
630
625
620
129+50
t230
.CKLEN
,.B. 377
M.B. \
PID
ZON
NO SIT
CELI
EXIST GAS UTILITY (DEPTH
AND MATERIAL UNKNOWN)
N/F \\TAMMY WILLINGHAM
D.B. 28342. PG. 178
M.B. 3, PG. 301
PID 06909414
ZONED R-1238 MF\
27CELIA AVE. J
M.B. 3, PG. 30t D.B. 31455, PG. 557 \\\ \ 8
t PID 06908120 M.B. 3. PG. 301 C-800 ENTRANCE
\ N SEITEE ADDRESS \ PID 06908-5 '%4 / t STORY
CEUA AVE. WOOD
NO SITEZONADDRESS \'B `\ \ RESIDENCE
I I
RESIDENCE
N/F \ CELIA
E`t �o� FLOODWAY \ .� A AIR RELEASE 2 STORY
MECKLENBURG COU t Fw RESIDENCE
D.B. 37740. PG. 551 „ / \ \ C-903 MANHOLE
M.B. 3. PG. 301 INSTALL PROPER E&SC Fw I,,..,..--- .
PID 06908121 \ / \ RESIDENCE
ZONED R-5 TO PROTECT STREAM
NO CELIAAA\DDRESS \ SHEOERIGK dr I
TEMPORARY STREAM A D.BE36495, PG.E 0
\ CROSSING C-802 \"� PID
0127 ZONED R-5
\ 2737 CELIA AVE. \ N/F
\ N/F
O ARYAN VENTURES LLC BEL A LA TRT T
\ t0 D' M.B. 32P9G. 301 )
\o / 188 D.B. 2 PG. 723
M.B. 3, PG. 301
N PID 06I PID 25EXIST 8VCP SZONED R-5ZONED R-5 I
H' 2733 CELIA AVE. 2729 CELIA AVE.
\� tt 13
4i t 2
\�A 14 /
N/F /
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
D.B. 9276. PG. 437
PID 06909427
ZONED R-5
1501 MCDONALD ST.
I
N/F
JOHN EARL
CHAMBERS
D.B. 4142. PG. 431
M.B. 3. PG. 301
PID 06909459
ZONED R-12MF
_ 2720 CELIA AVE.
U
C9
_M
Q
LL/ _O
Z �
J�Q
V
QZ
Z O )ER
DICTION
0
00
ao
--
60
zo
--
`� CO
CO CO
CO
cV
rn
> M
>
O CO co
C _ In p O
O
(D-
CO
-Co cc -If)
O
(fl (0
_ r : Co N
Lf) N
_ O Co
CIDU
�
coLl +I _ CO
N
Lf)
M O O I—
Cc
CV
>Q +r
�
N H 00
co
O Co CID
M i O
Ln Cfl
O r- Cc Z O
CD
0) Z�
�Z_
>�
CO
N M CD O M
O% �
M N Cfl
O�r N co0) ) Z
Z>
+�O
c)Lo>
M�
z
+�Z
c,)
� +�Z
)�MLr-:>
O
M��Ln O
N
�^
M
Oz -
i`Co
Jw
p zZ_L0Z
1�'0
r`�
Li
LLI zz
Co-
-(.0Z .-.
�C_fl
�C0
,—
_
�g�wzcn
U)
a� � 60rxz
cn��w?
U)
02& �
cowl— C11)
APPROX.
EXISTING GRADE
INSTALL AIR RELEASE
MANHOLE AT HIGH POINT
—
— —
_ _
—� — —
---- —
------
-------------- --
— — — — — —
-------
0
w
o m
. o
= N
E14
S
L� m
DO, m
M
N
00
LD
o LO
< O
ccoN
C)
(n2
N
— N
Q o
Q 0-'�O
�O
I
I
442 LF OF 16" RJDIP
130+00 130+50 131+00 131+50 132+00 132+50 133+00 133+50 134+00 134+50 135+00 135+50 136+00 136+50 137+00
710
705
700
695
690
685
680
10, 0 10, 20'
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=10'
40' 20' 0 40' 80,
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 "=40'
GENERAL NOTES-
1. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER SHALL BE 3 FEET IN EASEMENTS
AND ALL NON -PAVED AREAS. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER
SHALL BE 4 FEET IN ALL PAVED AREAS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE PER DRAWING C-801
DETAIL A & B WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AS REQUIRED
FOR PROPER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL OR AS
INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT AS
NEEDED TO INSTALL PIPING PER DRAWING C-902 DETAIL C,
UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL, WITH CITY INSPECTOR, DISCOVER AND
FIELD VERIFY MATERIAL OF SERVICE LINES ALONG
ALIGNMENT CORRIDOR ACCORDING TO THE GENERAL NOTES
ON G-001. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REPORT AS
INDICATED IN GENERAL NOTES AND REPLACE SERVICE LINES
AS INDICATED IN THE GENERAL NOTES.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL DUAL WRAP 16" DIP FM ACCORDING TO
GENERAL NOTES WHERE ALIGNMENT CROSSES METALLIC
GAS LINES.
BLACK & VEATCH
•
Black & Veatch International Company
Business License No. F-0794
10925 David Taylor Drive, Suite 280
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
SENSITIVE
DOCUMENTS
CHARLOTTE
WATER
VEST RESIDUALS &
BACKWASH FORCE MAIN
TO FRANKLIN WTP
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
675
670
665
660
655
650
645
640
635
SHEET KEYNOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL NEW 16" DIP FM IN CDOT
RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR FUTURE CELIA AVE CONNECTION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 16" DIP FM BELOW INVERT
ELEVATION OF EXISTING PARALLEL SANITARY SEWER PIPING OR 4
FT BELOW GRADE (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) ALONG THE FUTURE
CELIA AVE (CONNECTION BETWEEN BOTH CELIA AVE EXISTING
ROADS) SOUTHWEST SIDE OF STREAM TO ALLOW FOR FUTURE
SANITARY SEWER LATERALS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG FUTURE CELIA
AVE CONNECTOR RIGHT-OF-WAY (LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE). SILT
FENCE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 16"x6" REDUCING TEE AND INSTALL
6" DIP FROM TEE TO EXISTING SS MANHOLE (MH-175580) WITH
ASSOCIATED FITTINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEE WITH
BRANCH ON HORIZONTAL PLANE. INSTALL 6" GATE VALVE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL CORE DRILL MANHOLE TO INSTALL 6" DIP TO
MATCH CROWNS WITH EFFLUENT SS LINE. GROUT ANNULAR
SPACE BETWEEN 6" DIP AND MANHOLE.
REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE
DESIGNED: MPG, JRG
DETAILED: SPS
CHECKED: DLC
APPROVED: KJM
DATE: FEBRUARY 2023
PROJECT NO.: 193725
CIVIL
630
625
620
137+50
16-INCH DIP FORCE MAIN -
PLAN & PROFILE STA
129+50 TO 137+50
LU
00
0 0
w o
0 J 0r
LL LL LL p
INote: Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from Microsoft Corporation. Aerial imagery provided by Bing Maps, © 2020
Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS, Bing
(SCALE BAR IS 4" AT FULL SCALE) 0 1 /2 1
2 3 4
25
C-116 OF
47

w
J
LL
O
d
z
a
z
a
J
IL
00z
LD Y
o �
>O
co
N
o
N a
N U
/ N/
2620 CEF
LIA AVE.
TRUST
D.B. 34180, PG. 627
/ M.B. 5, PG. 9
PID 069D9420
/ ZONED R-1
2�2 / 0 CELIA AVE. AVE.
/ N/F
IBRAHIM ATINSOLA & D
JOY NOEL ANDERSON
D.B. 36525, PG. 469 \ /
M.B. 5, PG. 9
PID 06909419
ED R AVE
•/ N/F/ / L AADDRESS
/ 145 A PG. 7S EXIST 8" DIP
M.B 3, PG Ot / / I
46, /� "
_,2MF �r ^�� EXIST 8 DIP
aUA 61
DEFLE
O N/F r �Y NEEDI
EXIST 8" DIP SS ITY F AR TT I ENCE
Y.
D. M2B. 5 , P , 9236 IN
�ID 0690 18ED R-12MHI Y I NTE ADDRESS (f0�
O D.B. 270 738 \ LIA AVE.
/v \
+ Y 10,,23, PG, 301
D ENLE 4'ID 06909jb1' C, 13 I 6 4'
ZONE R- 2MF \`7 G)
2ELIA AVE. Ji
ll
v 37 EXIST 18" RCP SD
C) EXIST GAS �40+OC
139+00
T \ W
O� r— EXI.c
.RCP/ i
RIM 670.50/ LQ `NV. 67
IN..- 67.35'- TINE LQD � EXIST 2" PVC FW I J7=6 3.:
R72- 70. 7• 45' HORZ BEND 8' W x 5' H 96"X 60"
/ IN ✓ or-w(s N:553560.36 E l0 CULVERT ( ) D.B.' 7
IN .=667 0 '-OU T(N 61 V.- 4• ZPID
ONE
�` E:1443899.67
' V ,^ O I N V. = 6 2639 f
STREAM FLOW PASSES THROUGH ' J
8'X5' CULVERT UNDER ROAD. NEW /� I = 5 I EXIST 36"
FORCEMAIN SHALL GO UNDER WOOD
CATCHBASINC `� f /
CULVERT AND NOT IMPACT STREAM Fj / IC/� / UTILIL
INLET PROTECTION C-801 t �.
OR STREAM FLOW. /
1721 CELIA AVE. ( A S648. IT NS LLC
\ /
,733G. 555
M.B. 3. PC. 3
D O01
,g)/ / PIyS0 -0
27 \
\ �J Z0'ICIE9LOI Y AVE. / \\
2725 CELIA/AVE, LLC / O N/F
D.B. 36830. PG, 546 , SIDDAMINCHU LLC
M.B. 3, PG. 301 D.B. 31139, PG. 399 / �F
PID 069DBI14 \ a PID 06906238
ZONED R-5 3 I ZONED R-12MF
2725 CELIA AVE. \ ry 2700 DUNDEEN ST.
16 time
oa z
730
725
720
715
710
705
700
695
690
685
680
675
670
665
660
655
650
645
640
N/F
DMF-MANAGEMENT. LLC
/ D.B. 37377, PG. 726
M.B. 5, PG. 9
N/F / /
/ / D.B. N25174, PG. 170 ( ( PIZONE
E9A _ _ 1
M.B . 5, PG. 9 I ((
/ PID 06909425 \ 1 1
2• STRIP ZONED R-12MF
D.B. 1568. PG. 463 N/F / / 1409 ROSETTA ST.
JESUS ADRIAN
IRACHETA 0RTIZ &
\ MARIA TOARLE is
D.B.2aO 8, PG. ES / ' 1 \ �l�U� � / 1 STORY
N/F .B. B. 5. PC. 854 \ i
M.B. 5, PG. 9 O BRICK
JESUS ADRIAN `� r
CHETA ORTIZ & ZONED6 R09 ?A2F / / / �� I(/ RESDENCE
UARIA THMASAARLES
B „Z6f4�ELIA AVE Y \ \ \ \ \ a I \ \ ( \ I
pfD 310 9 / �I D.B. T2695. PG. 5H RA Y7 \ \ \ \ \
i16�F�CJLRI /\ \ . I I I I Z NEDB. SR 4 `� \ \ 1 1 BRICST.K 1 ri / �. _ l \ \ I Lt7� 1 Un,, RMFTTA ST t9_ RESIDENCE
I I III RESDENCE J I�
I N/�
SEN . 41,. R ul A .
N/F D.B. 34630, PG. 974
TRAVA IA p u1 uc PID 06906259
I D.B. 13989, PG, 821 ZONED R-12MF
PID 06906260 2625 CELIA AVE.
ZONED R-12MF 7A
2631 CELIA AVE,
8A
I
-J I
1
GRAN OOT
N
DE OP R
RUKIYA K L Y
D,B. 36537, PG. 8
D.B. 36474, PG. 966
PID 06906257
PID 06906258
ZONED R-12MF
ZONED R-12MF
2609 CELIA AVE.
2617 CELIA AVE.
SA
6A
I____Lj
N/F
PROP RRO� (•
D.B. 29059. PG. 81
PID 06906256
ZONED R-12MF
2603 CELIA AVE.
N/F
_ BRUCE L1 4, PG. NRIGHT
D.B. 128192
M.R.�y PG4
PID 06,gA56� 94
Z R-5
-�407-OR�ST.-,
9
EXIb I b„ (;II 1 VV-1 1 V 1 V V 1 V V
r+�
D.B. 33437. P 398
M.B. 230, PG, 228
1
\ ZONED2SMF
1
1317 666NNNNNN
1
5
\ C
lJ 11
I W /�y0
ION C-801
I
OR
BRICK
RESDENCE
I
LO
NIE
1
oea 23°•goe2 ME44
I
II�
I
N" 0l0 p6 K1L
f N/F /
BRI N KOVALF
148. 33872. PG. 900
PID 06906254
ZONED R-5
W 2523 CELIA AVF ibl
N/F
PARAGON REALTY
INVESTMENTS LLC
D.B. 29530, PG. 540
M.B. 3, PG. 391
PID 06906245
ZONED R-12MF
2520 DUNDEEN ST.
M.B. 3. PG. 391
PID 06906246
ZONED R-12MF
2516 DUNDEEN ST.
O
R-5
AVE.
Nam`
PARAGON REALTY
INVESTMENTS LLC
D.B. 29538, PG. 546
M.B. 3. PG. 391 I
PID 06906247
ZONED R-12MF
2512 DUNDEEN ST. I
�w +I
730
725
720
715
710
705
700
695
690
685
680
675
670
665
660
655
650
645
640
137+50 138+00 138+50 139+00 139+50 140+00 140+50 141+00 141+50 142+00 142+50 143+00 143+50 144+00 144+50 145+00 145+50
Ln
> Lri
Co
+w60
�
-
It
O J
~
- 00
_
jV
W
CO CO
oo
eo
_
00
_
_
f� O
M
H
_
X O
O CID
;
J
M
O M C7
M
Y
U)
0)
" 0p
O
rn Ci
�
O
— O N
O
r`
(�
W H
+I
Ln CO
0000 C) +I
U O M
�O
O
Cr)
N Lf)
Lf) to
O M
(0 ~
U)
Ln
Z +I
(n
Ln
LL
07 � r
+I
+
+
+
O
LID
���
U N
Lr
O
C\j�M�O
M�
O
N
EL M
(D Lf)
CO
O
IL q
LfJ
N
CL
M
00
�d�
U M
N O O Lo
~ Co
�
°
a0
J
W
LC) Z_
N� r
J
W
+
+ -
O +
O
MOZ
oo�Lf)
NCO + XCO
+
MOZZ
LnQCOLnNM
+
(D +
MN
OY�
Z +
Zf�
OQ
+
a7>O
O +
N0)L)O
00 +
��?Z
+
�
0) ���
OO +
M�
=cob
+
QO
> �_2^
Q
>
/
f�00M
�(D
M
J 00CY)
>
00O 00o0O
~ W �Hlj
0.)
rL0(oZz
0) O
z
0)00OOOLf)
_
— O�CO
CD
_
000ro
_
�0)O—
NC0(0
NO
ZZ O
('M(Dr-
U)
Z U)
U)
Z
�U)
W
��(.6
�U)
WTLnO
Z �U)
�
W �NLQ
OZ
<U)Lu
�N�
zZ Z Q�
<U)Lu
/
i
�x>
Cnw?
U)
o �_���
U).
x> �x>
W? cnw?
i.-
cn�a
�
�x>P=�
cnWz(�2�
�X>
I1J cnw?
�Xo
<U)
�x>
caw?
�_�
072�w
F_x>
cnw?
Q=�
--- iw
zin�
PX>
cnw?
I--
cowl—
c~i)
�
/
/
APPIZOX. EXISTING GRADE
i
0
- - - - - -
- U-7
i
C, 00
Z
Z
Z
Z
W
m
W
m
Z
W N
W
m
m
Cfl Ln
U-) Cr) N
N +
Lo
M
0
L
N
N
N +
r
M
+
q
N
a�
Q
> ��
�°
300 LF OF
16" RJDIP
10, 0 10, 20'
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=10'
40' 20' 0 40' 80,
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 "=40'
GENERAL NOTES:
1. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER SHALL BE 3 FEET IN EASEMENTS
AND ALL NON -PAVED AREAS. MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER
SHALL BE 4 FEET IN ALL PAVED AREAS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE PER DRAWING C-801
DETAIL A & B WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AS REQUIRED
FOR PROPER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL OR AS
INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT AS
NEEDED TO INSTALL PIPING PER DRAWING C-902 DETAIL C,
UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL, WITH CITY INSPECTOR, DISCOVER AND
FIELD VERIFY MATERIAL OF SERVICE LINES ALONG
ALIGNMENT CORRIDOR ACCORDING TO THE GENERAL NOTES
ON G-001. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REPORT AS
INDICATED IN GENERAL NOTES AND REPLACE SERVICE LINES
AS INDICATED IN THE GENERAL NOTES.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL DUAL WRAP 16" DIP FM ACCORDING TO
GENERAL NOTES WHERE ALIGNMENT CROSSES METALLIC
GAS LINES.
0. BLACK & VEATCH
Black & Veatch International Company
Business License No. F-0794
10925 David Taylor Drive, Suite 280
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
SENSITIVE
DOCUMENTS
CHARLOTTE
WATER
VEST RESIDUALS &
BACKWASH FORCE MAIN
TO FRANKLIN WTP
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE
DESIGNED:
MPG, JRG
DETAILED:
SPS
CHECKED:
DLC
APPROVED:
KJM
DATE:
FEBRUARY 2023
PROJECT NO.:
193725
CIVIL
16-INCH DIP FORCE MAIN -
PLAN & PROFILE STA
137+50 TO 145+50
26
w C-117 OF
oJ o� Note: Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from Microsoft Corporation. Aerial imagery provided by Bing Maps, © 2020 47
LL LL LLD Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS, Bing
(SCALE BAR IS 4" AT FULL SCALE) 0 1 /2 1
2 3 4

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
Force Main Improvement Project
Vest WTP to Franklin WTP
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. CMU-428
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed force main improvement project is located within an existing easement that connects
the Franklin WTP located at 5100 Brookshire Boulevard and the Vest WTP located at 820 Beatties
Ford Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The easement is owned and
operated by Charlotte Water.
H&H reviewed State and Federal threatened and endangered species databases for the Site and
conducted a screening survey of the Site and surrounding area for federally -listed threatened and
endangered species and their habitats, and none were identified. H&H also reviewed the National
Registry of Historic Places (NRHP) for Sites located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) GIS viewer; and the Site and
surrounding area via visual reconnaissance for the potential presence of historic, cultural, and/or
archeological sites. No recorded sites were noted on or adjacent to the Site. H&H requested
comment on the Site from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC), and NC SHPO in November 2022. Agency responses are
included in Appendix D.
To minimize Site impacts, the proposed installation plan was designed to avoid Waters of the US
to the maximum extent practicable. The force main installation will be conducted entirely within
an existing easement, and no additional land area is required to facilitate this project. Furthermore,
the force main pipe will completely avoid crossings to SCA in the eastern portion of the Site and
to Stewart Creek in the central portion of the Site. The force main will be installed below an
existing culvert located within SCA and will not result in additional impacts to SCA. The force
main will be installed aerially on existing piers in and near Stewart Creek and will not result in
additional impacts to Stewart Creek. Only temporary impacts to SCB, SCD, and SCE are required
to facilitate the installation of the force main pipe. The only permanent impact proposed by the
1
https://huthick.shuepoint.coin/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities -CMU/CMU-400s hart : hickman
Contract/CMU428 Franklin to Vest WetlandsMetland Delineation/Pennitting/08_C - Avoid and Minimize.docx
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

project is to SCE to install an emergency access crossing, which will be used by Charlotte Water
for maintenance and access throughout the easement as needed. The permanent impact is minimal
and only totals approximately 30 linear feet of stream impact. Furthermore, the force main pipe
is needed by Charlotte Water in order to pump residuals and backwash generated at the Vest WTP
to the Franklin WTP for treatment where Charlotte Water has the greater capacity and technology
to do so.
The force main will be installed using open -cut trench techniques within the streams and
throughout the easement, and the streams will be restored to pre -construction conditions and
contours upon the completion of the installation. The restoration activities will be conducted in
accordance with Charlotte Water's design manual.
During Site development, good erosion and sediment control practices will be followed. Extensive
silt fencing will be used on the construction Site perimeter and along stream channels.
Mitigation
Mitigation is typically required by Nationwide Permit 958 for stream impacts greater than 0.02
acre. Although the proposed permanent stream impact only totals approximately 0.007 acre, the
Site is located within the 103 Watershed. Permanent impacts within the 103 Watershed which
result in the loss of jurisdictional waters typically require compensatory mitigation. Therefore,
compensatory mitigation for the 30-linear foot (0.007-acre) impact to SCE is proposed in the form
of purchasing mitigation credits from the City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Bank. The Credit Reservation Letter is attached in Appendix F. Based on the NC
SAM, the stream quality of SCE is low. Based on the results of the NC SAM, the proposed
mitigation ratio for stream impact is 2:1.
2
https://huthick.shuepoint.coin/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities -CMU/CMU-400s hart : hickman
Contract/CMU428 Franklin to Vest WetlandsMetland Delineation/Pennitting/08_C - Avoid and Minimize.docx
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Appendix D
Supplemental Documents
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Table 1. Parcel Owner Information
Parcel Identification Number
Name
Land � Address
03902503
JOSHUA THOMAS WIKE
509 N LINWOOD AV
06907106
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
736 PRINCE ST
06907108
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PRINCE ST
06910113
BRENDA EDDINGS
Single -Family
826 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06911322
LISA M. WEATHERS
Single -Family
3012 CELIA AV
06914301
HOME SFR BORROWER IV LLC
Single -Family
528 NELSON AV
06914410
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
541 NELSON AV
03904977
ANITA REGINA CARR
Single -Family
4134 TENNESSEE AV
06910217
G J'S COMPLETE BUILDING INC
708 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06911302
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
CELIA AV
06911321
TOMMY L CORNWELL
Single -Family
3016 CELIA AV
03904978
BARBARA T MARTYNA
Single -Family
4130 TENNESSEE AV
03904901
PLAINWOOD LLC
TENNESSEE AV
03904932
TAH 2O18-1 BORROWER LLC
Single -Family
621 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
03904942
CONREX ML PORTFOLIO 2019-01 OPERATING COMPANY LLC
Single -Family
4155 CANYON CREEK LN
06906248
NORRIS V ROBINSON
Single -Family
1301 ONYX ST
06906512
NATHANIEL E JONES JR
Single -Family
2220 SANDERS AV
06907114
ATTN: TAX DEPT - PB05B DUKE POWER CO
PRINCE ST
06910108
UNIVERSITY SMITH JOHNSON C
732 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06911317
ET-7 LP
Single -Family
3102 CELIA AV
06911320
SHANQUENA BOST
Single -Family
3020 CELIA AV
03902401
FOXTON T LEWYN
Single -Family
400 N HOSKINS RD
03902612
SOUTHGATE PROPERTIES LLC
Warehouse
601 CARRIER DR
06909404
MERVIN GILLAM
CELIA AV
06911301
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PHELPS ST
06914414
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
TENNESSEE AV
06906246
PARAGON REALTY INVESTMENTS LLC
Single -Family
2518 DUNDEEN ST
06909403
MERVIN GILLAM
CELIA AV
06909411
CHARLOTTE (TRUSTEES) HOLY TRINITY CHURCH OF GOD OF
CELIA AV
03904904
THE IRA CLUB
Single -Family
4100 TENNESSEE AV
03904918
JDH JR PROPERTIES
Warehouse
400 LAWTON RD
06910105
CHURCH INC MORRS HILL BAPTIST
Govt-Inst
724 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06911325
GICIAN PIERRE ROBERSON-URY
CELIA AV
06911326
GOLDWYN FLANDERS OWUSU
Single -Family
3032 LASALLE ST
06911303
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
3107 CELIA AV
06911407
MARTHA V WHITESIDES
CELIA AV
06906245
PARAGON REALTY INVESTMENTS LLC
Single -Family
2522 DUNDEEN ST
06914401
THEODORA PENDERGRASS DAVIDSON
Office
532 INGLE ST
03904931
ANGELO B DUNN
Single -Family
617 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
03904976
MICHAEL L JORDAN
Single -Family
4138 TENNESSEE AV
06906243
COACK PROPERTIES INC
Single -Family
2604 DUNDEEN ST
06906238
SIDDAMINCHU LLC
Multi -Family
2721 DUNDEEN ST
06910112
SHARON DAVIS
Single -Family
822 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06909407
CLARENCE CORNELIUS PATTERSON
CELIA AV
03904982
CLIFFORD ANUMAKA
LAWTON RD
06906242
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
2610 DUNDEEN ST
06909405
MERVIN GILLAM
CELIA AV
06909459
JOHN EARL CHAMBERS
2635 CELIA AV
03918107
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Govt-Inst
5200 BROOKSHIRE BV
06906514
DEREK WOODS
Single -Family
2212 SANDERS AV
03904937
ARACELI HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ
Single -Family
643 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
03904903
DANIEL CRUZ SANTOS
Single -Family
4102 TENNESSEE AV
06906240
KENNETH BAKER
Single -Family
2620 DUNDEEN ST
06906244
PARAGON REALTY INVESTMENTS LLC
Single -Family
2600 DUNDEEN ST
06906311
ALVAMILY LLC
Single -Family
1211 CAMPUS ST
06909452
TRACIE RACHELLE SMITH
CELIA AV
06910114
SANDRA L ANTHONY
Single -Family
830 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06910115
JANIE M MAYHAN
Single -Family
834 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06911319
ALISHA THOMPSON
Single -Family
3024 CELIA AV
06911410
FYR SFR BORROWER LLC
Single -Family
3015 REMINGTON ST
06906526
KLAO RMAH
Single -Family
2301 BOOKER AV
06910106
SARAH LEE CALDWELL
812 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06911304
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
CELIA AV
06914212
CHARLES EMINA
NELSON AV
07841501
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Govt-Inst
900 BEATTIES FORD RD
03902504
JOSHUA THOMAS WIKE
550 N CRIGLER ST
2

03904927
BELINDA SPEARS
Single -Family
606 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
03904935
AJAY SATSANGI
Single -Family
633 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
06909409
HOLY TRINITY CHURCH OF GOD OF CHAROLTTE TRUSTEES
CELIA AV
06911413
BETTY J ERWIN
Single -Family
3045 LASALLE ST
03904934
TRUST MESROPIAN FAMILY
Single -Family
629 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
03904933
ALTO ASSET COMPANY 1 LLC
Single -Family
625 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
06906510
MICHAEL L MCCLENDON
2228 SANDERS AV
06907105
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PRINCE ST
06909402
ASSOC INC WASHINGTON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY
CELIA AV
06914201
NATHANIEL EUGENE JONES
Single -Family
524 HONEYWOOD AV
06914405
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
TENNESSEE AV
03904939
NOBERTO AGUILAR-SANCHEZ
Single -Family
651 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
06906247
PARAGON REALTY INVESTMENTS LLC
Single -Family
2514 DUNDEEN ST
06906409
MCH SFR NC OWNER 2 LP
Single -Family
2300 BOOKER AV
06907118
RAMONA C NEAL
Single -Family
628 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06909408
MACIE STROUD
CELIA AV
06910107
SAN MARTIN INVESTMENTS LLC
Single -Family
726 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06911409
MARY B MRS N BROWN
Single -Family
3009 REMINGTON ST
06911406
UNIQUE DEUANNA DAVIS
CELIA AV
03904911
RAILWAY CO (CH AM) SEABOARD COAST LINE
Warehouse
601 N HOSKINS RD
06906508
FOUNDATION THE WATERMAN FAMILY
Govt-Inst
2300 SANDERS AV
06907104
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
740 PRINCE ST
06909414
TAMMY WILLINGHAM
Single -Family
2738 CELIA AV
06914101
JONATHAN WADE
Single -Family
522 INGLE ST
06914408
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
HONEYWOOD AV
03902601
SOUTHGATE PROPERTIES LLC
522 N LINWOOD AV
03908110
LESTER F LAIL
Warehouse
439 LAWTON RD
06914407
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
TENNESSEE AV
03908102
AGL ENTERPRISES INC
Warehouse Lg
433 LAWTON RD
06907113
ATTN: TAX DEPT - PB05B DUKE POWER CO
PRINCE ST
06910111
SARAH CALDWELL WRIGHT
Single -Family
816 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06914118
LATASHIA W ANTHONY
Single -Family
529 HONEYWOOD AV
06911324
JULIA M BELTON
Single -Family
3004 CELIA AV
06911411
HENRIETTA JONES REID
Single -Family
3021 REMINGTON ST
03905315
HOSKINS ROAD PROPERTY LLC
Warehouse
500 N HOSKINS RD
06906513
GEORGE JR MORELAND
Single -Family
2216 SANDERS AV
06907102
RCD PROPERTIES LLC
Single -Family
800 PRINCE ST
06911404
PATSY ORA SOWELL
CELIA AV
06914412
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
TENNESSEE AV
03904943
VM PRONTO LLC
Single -Family
4159 CANYON CREEK LN
03904975
DEBRA L LEGETTE
Single -Family
4152 TENNESSEE AV
06906239
PARAGON REALTY INVESTMENTS LLC
Single -Family
2624 DUNDEEN ST
06906310
EMANSER LLC
Single -Family
2300 TATE ST
06907116
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PRINCE ST
06909415
CURTIS LEE MINGO
CELIA AV
06909406
ANNIE RUTH ALSBROOKS
CELIA AV
06909410
CHARLOTTE (TRUSTEES) HOLY TRINITY CHURCH OF GOD OF
CELIA AV
06909416
CURTIS LEE MINGO
Single -Family
2728 CELIA AV
03904936
GJ'S COMPLETE BUILDING INC
Single -Family
639 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
06907115
ATTN: TAX DEPT - PB05B DUKE POWER CO
534 PRINCE ST
06911316
JAMES KARICKAL
Single -Family
3106 CELIA AV
06914409
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
TENNESSEE AV
06907103
ROSA A STEVENSON
Single -Family
744 PRINCE ST
06909451
BETTY RUTH BAUKNIGHT
Single -Family
2913 REMINGTON ST
03904938
MIRNA L GARCIA
Single -Family
647 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
06909413
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CHARLOTTE INC
2726 CELIA AV
06910104
CHURCH INC MORRIS HILL BAPTIST
716 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06910109
ETIENNE Y MBAMBUKULU
Single -Family
800 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06911412
RUTH BLACK
Single -Family
3027 REMINGTON ST
06914404
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
TENNESSEE AV
06914310
CHRISTOPHER T HILL
Single -Family
923 RAYON ST
03904902
DARRELL THOMAS WILSON
Single -Family
4148 TENNESSEE AV
06906241
KKJ PROPERTIES LLC
Single -Family
2614 DUNDEEN ST
06906430
JOANN MILLER
Single -Family
2301 TATE ST
06907124
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
538 PENNSYLVANIA AV
03904930
FRANK T CARTER
Single -Family
613 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
03904979
TIANNA NELSON
Single -Family
4126 TENNESSEE AV
parcel owners.xls

06906515
OPPORTUNITY FUNDS LLC
Office
1001 BEATTIES FORD RD
06909401
ALLIE GRANT
Single -Family
3101 BELLAIRE DR
06911323
TOMMY L CORNWELL
Single -Family
3008 CELIA AV
06914406
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
TENNESSEE AV
06914415
BANH SIU
Single -Family
987 RAYON ST
03902609
SOUTHGATE PROPERTIES LLC
513 CARRIER DR
03904929
GJ'S COMPLETE BUILDING INC
Single -Family
609 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
06911318
ET-7 LP
Single -Family
3028 CELIA AV
06914411
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
TENNESSEE AV
06914413
HONEYWOOD VENTURES LLC
NELSON AV
06914420
CHARLOTTE HOLDINGS 137 LLC
Multi -Family
3101 SOUTHWEST BV
03905316
CATAMOUNT PROPERTY MANAGER LLC
701 CARRIER DR
03905316
CATAMOUNT CHARLOTTE LLC
Warehouse Lg
701 CARRIER DR
06906261
HANNAH L WORCESTER
Single -Family
2639 CELIA AV
06907107
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
732 PRINCE ST
06911408
JODY N NANCE
Single -Family
3100 BELLAIRE DR
03902610
SOUTHGATE PROPERTIES LLC
524 N LINWOOD AV
06909412
HOLY TRINITY CHURCH
CELIA AV
06910110
VAN KPA
Single -Family
806 PENNSYLVANIA AV
06911405
WILLIAM MORTON MILLS
CELIA AV
03904928
ROBBIN BRITO SAUSTEGUI
Single -Family
605 HOSKINS RIDGE LN
06906511
MICHAEL L MCCLENDON
Single -Family
2224 SANDERS AV
06907101
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PRINCE ST
06908113
H U A M ACQUISITIONS LLC
2711 CELIA AV
Information obtained from Mecklenburg County GIS data, accessed on October 31, 2022.

QPP�MENT OFU.S.
WILDLIFE
'yFFISHSERVICE
i
; United States Department of the Interior
o
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE �Jr
h'9RCH 3, �aa Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street Suite B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
December 16, 2022
Ms. Danielle Clark
Hart & Hickman, PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Subject: Franklin Wastewater Treatment Plant (WTP) to Vest WTP Force Main Installation in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Clark:
On November 16, 2022, we received (via email) your information requesting our review of the subject
project. We have reviewed the information that you presented for this request and the following
comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C.§ 4321 et seq.) and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531
- 1543) (Act).
On July 5, 2022, the U.S. District Court of the Northern District Court of California vacated the 2019
regulations implementing section 7 of the Act. On September 21, 2022, the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals granted a request to stay the U.S. District Court of Northern California's July 5, 2022, order that
vacated the 2019 Act regulations. As a result, the 2019 regulations are again in effect, and the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (Service) has relied upon the 2019 regulations in issuing our written concurrence on
the action agency's "may affect, not -likely -to -adversely -affect" determination. However, because the
outcome of the legal challenges to the 2019 Act regulations is still unknown, we considered whether our
substantive analyses and conclusions would have been different if the pre-2019 regulations were applied
in this informal consultation. Our analysis included the prior definition of "effects of the action." We
considered all the "direct and indirect effects" and the "interrelated and interdependent activities" when
determining the "effects of the action." We then considered whether any "effects of the action" that
overlap with applicable ranges of listed species would be wholly beneficial, insignificant, or discountable
to the species. As a result, we determined the substantive analysis and conclusions would have been the
same, irrespective of which regulations applied.
Proiect Description
According to the information provided, the City of Charlotte proposes installation of approximately 12.2
miles of force main from the Franklin WTP to the Vest WTP in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina. The force main will be installed within an existing 40-foot-wide easement.
Federally Listed Species
An assessment of suitable habitat and potential impacts to five species was conducted by environmental
specialists with ECS Southeast, LLP on October 18 and 19, 2022. The findings were compiled and
included in the review request submitted to our office on November 16, 2022. The following species and
their associated habitats were evaluated.

Species
Status'
Carolina heelsplitter
Lasmigona decorata
E
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
E
Rusty -patched bumble bee
Bombus affinis
E
Schweinitz's sunflower
Helianthus schweinitzii
E
Smooth coneflower
Echinacea laevigata
T
lE = endangered and T = threatened.
The Service's Information for Planning and Consultation system (IPAC) identifies proposed and listed
species, and proposed and designated critical habitat that may occur within the proposed project's action
area. Only those species identified on the official species list generated by IPAC need analysis during
project review. Carolina heelsplitter and rusty -patched bumble bee are not identified on the official
species list for this project; therefore, consultation is not needed for these species.
The review request states that suitable habitats for Michaux's sumac, Schweinitz's sunflower, and smooth
coneflower are present on site; however, the species were not observed during surveys. Based on negative
results of visual surveys conducted on October 18 and 19, 2022, we would concur with "may affect, not
likely to adversely affect" determinations from the lead federal action agency for these species.
Suitable habitat for tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) may be present at the site. On September 14,
2022, the Service published a proposal in the Federal Register to list the tricolored bat as endangered
under the Act. The Service has up to 12 months from the date the proposal published to make a final
determination, either to list the tricolored bat under the Act or to withdraw the proposal. The Service
determined the bat faces extinction primarily due to the range -wide impacts of WNS. Because tricolored
bat populations have been greatly reduced due to WNS, surviving bat populations are now more
vulnerable to other stressors such as human disturbance and habitat loss. Species proposed for listing are
not afforded protection under the Act; however, as soon as a listing becomes effective (typically 30 days
after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register), the prohibitions against jeopardizing its
continued existence and "take" will apply. Therefore, if you suspect your future or existing project may
affect tricolored bats after the potential new listing goes into effect, we recommend analyzing possible
effects of the project on tricolored bats and their habitat to determine whether consultation under section 7
of the Act is necessary. Conferencing procedures can be followed prior to listing to ensure the project
does not jeopardize the existence of a species. Projects with an existing section 7 biological opinion may
require re -initiation of consultation to provide uninterrupted authorization for covered activities. Please
contact our office for additional guidance or assistance.
We believe the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled for the federally listed species
discussed above. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new
information reveals impacts of the identified action may affect listed species or critical habitat in a
manner not previously considered, (2) the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that was
not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be
affected by the identified action.
Fish and Wildlife Resource Recommendations
We offer the following general recommendations for the benefit of fish and wildlife resources:
• Equipment Use in Riparian Areas and In -Stream. Equipment should be operated from the
streambank. If in -stream work is necessary, stone causeways, work bridges, or mats (designed for
the specific location and type of equipment) should be used. Work pads on streambanks or

approaches to in -stream work areas should minimize disturbance to woody vegetation. Equipment
operated in riparian areas and in/near aquatic resources should be inspected daily and maintained
regularly to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic
fluids, or other toxic materials. Construction staging, toxic material storage, and equipment
maintenance, including refueling, should occur outside of the riparian area. The project proponent
should report any toxic material spills in riparian areas and/or aquatic resources to the Service
within 24 hours.
Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Construction activities near aquatic resources, streams,
and wetlands have the potential to cause bank destabilization, water pollution, and water quality
degradation if measures to control site runoff are not properly installed and maintained. In order
to effectively reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts, best management practices specific to
the extent and type of construction should be designed and installed prior to land -disturbing
activities and should be maintained throughout construction. Natural fiber matting (coir) should
be used for erosion control as synthetic netting can trap animals and persists in the environment
beyond its intended purpose. Land disturbance should be limited to what can be stabilized
quickly, preferably by the end of the workday. Once construction is complete, disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native riparian grass and tree species as soon as possible. For
maximum benefits to water quality and bank stabilization, riparian areas should be forested;
however, if the areas are maintained in grass, they should not be mowed. The Service can provide
information on potential sources of plant material upon request.
A complete design manual that is consistent with the requirements of the North Carolina
Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act and Administrative Rules, can be found at the following
website: https:lldeq.nc.govlabout/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources.
Stream Buffers. Natural, forested riparian buffers are critical to the health of aquatic ecosystems.
They accomplish the following:
o Catch and filter runoff, thereby helping to prevent nonpoint-source pollutants from
reaching streams.
o Enhance the in -stream processing of both point- and nonpoint-source pollutants.
o Act as "sponges" by absorbing runoff (which reduces the severity of floods) and by
allowing runoff to infiltrate and recharge groundwater levels (which maintains stream
flows during dry periods).
o Catch and help prevent excess woody debris from entering the stream and creating
logjams.
o Stabilize stream banks and maintain natural channel morphology.
o Provide coarse woody debris for habitat structure and most of the dissolved organic
carbon and other nutrients necessary for the aquatic food web.
o Maintain air and water temperatures around the stream.
Forested riparian buffers (a minimum 50 feet wide along intermittent streams and 100 feet wide
along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain, whichever is greater])
should be created and/or maintained adjacent to all aquatic areas. Within the watersheds
supporting federally listed aquatic species, we recommend undisturbed, forested buffers that are
naturally vegetated with trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation. These buffers should extend a
minimum of 200 feet from the banks of all perennial streams and a minimum of 100 feet from
the banks of all intermittent streams (or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain, whichever is
greater.) Impervious surfaces, ditches, pipes, roads, utility lines (sewer, water, gas, transmission,
etc.), and other infrastructure that requires maintenance, cleared rights -of -way and/or compromise
the functions and values of the forested buffers should not occur within these riparian areas.

• Utility Line Crossings. In the interest of reducing impacts to natural resources, utility crossings
(i.e., sewer, gas, and water lines) should be kept to a minimum, and all utility infrastructure
(including manholes) should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. If a utility crossing is necessary,
we recommend that you first consider the use of directional boring. Directional boring under
streams significantly minimizes impacts to aquatic resources and riparian buffers.
If directional boring cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable method,
every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in -stream features are minimized and
stabilized upon completion of the project. Our past experiences with open -trench crossings
indicate that this technique increases the likelihood for future lateral movement of the stream
(which could undercut or erode around the utility line), and the correction of such problems could
result in costly future maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources. Therefore, as
much work as possible should be accomplished in the dry, and the amount of disturbance should
not exceed what can be successfully stabilized by the end of the workday. In -stream work should
avoid the spring fish spawning season and should consider forecasted high flow events.
Regardless of the crossing method, all utility lines should cross streams perpendicularly. We
strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the work area until the work is complete in
order to identify any additional impact -minimization measures. The Service may be available to
assist you in this effort.
To determine if any maintenance is required, the work site should be monitored at least every 3
months during the first 24 months and annually thereafter. Moreover, we recommend the
development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance program that would outline procedures for
the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility crossing (should any streambank erosion
or destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Ms. Rebekah Reid of
our staff at [e-mail], if you have any questions. In any future correspondence concerning
this project, please reference Log Number 4-2-23-316.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Cameron Ingram, Executive Director
15 December 2022
Ms. Danielle Clark
Hart & Hickman PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Ste 301
Raleigh, NC 27607
Subject: Request for Environmental Review
Franklin to Vest Force Main Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Clark,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) received your email on 16
November 2022. Biologists with NCWRC have reviewed the subject information. Comments are
provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is requesting information on the potential impacts to threatened and
endangered species and critical habitats at or near the proposed Franklin to Vest Force Main Improvement
Project. The force main pipe will be installed between the Charlotte Water Franklin Water Treatment
Plant (WTP) located at 5100 Brookshire Boulevard and the Vest WTP located at 820 Beatties Ford in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The site consists primarily of maintained utility corridor
and paved roadways.
The project will cross Stewart Creek and its unnamed tributaries. Stewart Creek in the Catawba River
Basin is classified as a Class C stream by the NC Division of Water Resources. We have no current
records of state or federal rare, threatened, or endangered species in or near the project. H&H surveyed
the site for federally protected species and their suitable habitat in October 2022, and no individuals or
their habitat were observed during the field survey.
We offer the following preliminary recommendations to minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial
wildlife resources.
1. Maintain a minimum 100-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams, and a
minimum 50-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed,
forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife
resources, water quality, and aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the project area.
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
15 December 2022
Franklin to Vest Force Main
Mecklenburg County
Also, wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining stability of stream banks and for treatment
of pollutants associated with urban stormwater.
All utility crossings of streams and wetlands should be kept to a minimum, which includes careful
routing design and the combination of utility crossings into the same right-of-way (provided there
is not a safety issue). Sewer lines, water lines, and other utility infrastructure should be kept out
of riparian buffer areas. Manholes or similar access structures should not be allowed within buffer
areas. Stream crossings should be near perpendicular (750 to 1050) to stream flow.
Jack and bore stream crossing method should be used for utility crossings wherever practicable.
However, if jack and boring cannot be used on all streams and trenching is determined to be the
only viable method, every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in -stream features are
minimized and stable upon completion of the project. Open -trench crossings have been found to
increase the likelihood for future lateral movement of the stream (which could undercut or erode
around the utility line), and the correction of such problems could result in costly future
maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources. Therefore, as much work as possible
should be accomplished in the dry, and the amount of disturbance should not exceed what can be
successfully stabilized by the end of the workday. In -stream work should consider forecasted
high -flow events.
4. Avoid tree clearing activities during the maternity roosting season for bats (May 15 — August 15)
because of the decline in populations of several tree -roosting bat species.
5. In -stream work should consider forecasted high -flow events. Sediment and erosion control
measures should be installed prior to any land -disturbing activity. Banks should be stabilized and
sediment barriers installed as soon as possible, but at least within 24 hours.
6. During construction, equipment should not be staged in stream channels or riparian buffers.
Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land -disturbing activity.
The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices is strongly
recommended throughout the project. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have
loose -weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the
vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing that has been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh
should be avoided as it impedes the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt and
sediment loads can have detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of
spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills.
Non-native plants should not be used for seeding disturbed areas. Specifically, avoid using
Bermudagrass, redtop, tall fescue, and lespedeza, which are invasive and/or non-native. A list of
alternatives to non-native species has been attached. Alternatively, use a grain, such as oats,
wheat, or rye for temporary cover and native seed mixes for permeant seeding. We recommend
planting native, wildflower seed mixes that will create pollinator habitat within the project
boundary.
At this time, the information provided is not sufficient for our staff to make definitive recommendations
or conclusions concerning this project. If I can be of additional assistance, please call [phone] or
email olivia.munzerkncwildlife.org.
Sincerely,
Olivia Munzer
Western Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

RECOMMENDED NATIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR NON-NATIVE GRASSES IN
NORTH CAROLINA"
(Species are appropriate for all geographic regions unless otherwise indicated)
NON-NATIVE SPECIES
NATIVE SPECIES
Big bluestem
Andropogon gerardii
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans
Crownvetch
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Centipede
Beaked panicgrass
Panicum anceps
Bermuda
Purpletop
Tridens flavus
Roundheaded bushclover
Lespedeza capitata
Deer tongue
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata
Big bluestem
Andropogon gerardii
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Kentucky bluegrass
Beaked panicgrass
Panicum anceps
Tall fescue
Purpletop
Tridens flavus
Sudangrass
Broomsedge
Andropogon virginicus
Deer tongue
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Canadian wildrye
Elymus canadensis
Virginia wildrye
Elymus virginicus
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Splitbeard bluestem
Andropogon ternarius
Sericea lespedeza
Beggarlice
Desmodium spp.
Kobe lespedeza
Deer tongue
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata
SANDHILLS
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Purple lovegrass
Eragrostis spectabilis
Weeping lovegrass
Muhly Grass
Muhlenbergia capillaris
Bermuda
Wiregrass
Aristida stricter
Buttonweed
Prairie threeawn
Aristida oligantha
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata

NC Native Plant Recommendations
**A recommended revegetation/stabilization mix would ideally include a combination
of the species listed in this table. In addition, please note that additional consideration
may be needed in areas that are (highly) erodible and/or have sloped terrain. The
following species could be included in all regions for additional stabilization and
wildlife benefit:
Black-eyed Susan:
Plains coreopsis:
Lance -leaved coreopsis:
Narrow -leaved sunflower:
Created October 2018
Rudbeckia hirta
Coreopsis tinctoria
Coreopsis lanceolate
Helianthus angustifolius

5rArl
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
January 12, 2023
Danielle Clark
Hart & Hickman
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, NC 27607
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
dclarkghathickman.com
Re: Install force main between Franklin water treatment plant and Vest water treatment plant, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, ER 22-2854
Dear Ms. Clark:
Thank you for your email of November 17, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submission and offer the following comments. We apologize for the delay in our response.
Based on the location of the proposed line within the confines of Sanders Avenue, the project will have no
adverse effect on the National Register -eligible Excelsior Club (MK1829) and Charlotte Water Works/Vest
Station (MK1815). Additionally, we have determined that the project as proposed will have no adverse
effect on the Study -Listed Franklin Water Works (MK2158).
Based on our knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project. We, therefore,
recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewkncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
{j State Historic Preservation Officer
cc: Stewart Gray, Charlotte -Mecklenburg HLC stewart. grn2mecklenburgcoun . nc. _ ov
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

From:
Danielle Clark
To:
401 PreFi le
Subject:
401/Buffer Pre -filing Meeting Request
Date:
Monday, January 16, 2023 9:50:00 AM
Please fill out the following information
Project Name: Vest to Franklin Force Main Installation Project
County: Mecklenburg
Applicant Name: Charlotte Water — Justin Webster, PE
Applicant Email: Justin.Webster&charlottenc.gov
**Please note that multiple projects may be submitted within the same email by supplying all
the above information for each project.
***In the event your email is not allowing auto -responses, please save a copy of your sent
email for your records and if necessary use that copy in application/form submittal.

Appendix E
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

SAW-2023-00273
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2023-00273 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-Derita
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Charlotte Water
Justin Webster
Address: 5100 Brookshire Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28216
Telephone Number: 980-312-2768
E-mail: justin.webster@charlottenc. oo
Size (acres) 12.2 Nearest Town Charlotte
Nearest Waterway Stewart Creek River Basin Santee
USGS HUC 03050103 Coordinates Latitude: 35.266232
Longitude:-80.873313
Location description: The project is located between 5100 Brookshire Blvd. and 820 Beatties Ford Rd. in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 12/5/2022. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of
impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a
preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they
are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable
action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA
jurisdiction over all of the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable
permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waterson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.

SAW-2023-00273
❑ The waters on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly suggest you have
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Doug Perez at 704-510-1439 or
doug. i.perez@ usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary iurisdictional determination
form dated 03/06/2023.
D. Remarks: Please see approximate aquatic resources on maps `Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map -
Southeast Area, Central Area, and Northwest Area, 121512022 ".
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A. SHANNINgUSACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**

SAW-2023-00273
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 03/06/2023 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
Copy Furnished:
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http: //corpsmapu.usace .army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=13 6:4: 0
Copy furnished:
Agent:
Hart & Hickman, PC
Danielle Clark
Address:
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number:
919-723-2516
E-mail:
[e-mail]

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Charlotte Water, ustin Webster File Number: SAW-2023-00273 Date: 03/06/2023
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑X
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
II - REQUEST FOR APP L or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
Attn: Doug Perez
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Charlotte Regulatory Office
CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
PHONE: [phone]; FAX [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(aUSACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportum to participate in all site invest] ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Doug Perez, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 03/06/2023
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Charlotte Water, Justin Webster, 5100
Brookshire Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28216
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Vest to Franklin Force Main
Project, SAW-2023-00273
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project is located between 5100
Brookshire Blvd. and 820 Beatties Ford Rd. in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.266232 Longitude:-80.873313
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Stewart Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
®Office (Desk) Determination. Date:03/06/2023
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
(decimal
(decimal
amount of
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic
degrees)
degrees)
aquatic
wetland vs.
resource "may be"
resources in
non -wetland
subject (i.e., Section 404
review area
waters)
or Section 10/404)
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
SCA
35.25665600
-80.86279900
32 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
SCB
35.25842800
-80.86457000
31 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
SCC
35.25966300
-80.86840200
33 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
SCD
35.27288600
-80.88031300
29 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
SCE
35.27651100
-80.88421000
65 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AID or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AID, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there 'may be "waters of the U.S. and/or that there "maybe " navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
NMaps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 2-5 prepared by H&H dated 11/29/2022 and 12/05/2022
NData sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters' study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data:
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
NU.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Derita Mountain Island Lake, 1:24,000
❑Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey Version 3.4, 12/05/2022
NNational wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS Wetlands, 12/05/2022
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
N FEMA/FIRM maps: Figure A5 (3710453500J, 3710453600J, & 3710454600J, 02/03/2009
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
®Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
or N Other (Name & Date): Site Photos, CMU-428, October 2022
❑Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information (please specify): Published Soil Survey, 1980
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
L>611ZQ11 109A,�
Signature and d e of Regu ory
staff member completing PJD
03/06/2023
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Appendix F
Mitigation Credit Reservation Letter
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Charlotte -Mecklenburg
STORM
WATER
9 Services U
Justin Webster
Charlotte Water
5100 Brookshire Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28216
600 E. Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Fax [phone]
March 9, 2023
Transmitted via email to Danielle Clark and Julia McGuire dclarkgharthickman.com jmcguireaharthickinan.com
Subject Project: Vest WTP to Franklin WTP Force Main Improvement Project
HUC#: 03050103 (Lower Catawba)
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
("Umbrella Bank") is willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the
decision by the Umbrella Bank to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or the North Carolina Division of Water Quality 401/Wetlands Unit. It is the
responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the Umbrella Bank for impacts associated
with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. The following documents must be submitted to the
Umbrella Bank within this time frame for this acceptance to remain valid:
1. 404 Permit Verification
2. 401 Water Quality Certification
3. Executed Departmental Transfer Invoice (DTI) between Engineering Services and Storm Water Services
detailing the use of and payment for the credits described in the table below.
Based on the information supplied by your office, the stream credits that are necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation
requirements for this project are detailed in the table below. The total mitigation credits available for this project are also
indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet)
Wetlands
(acres)
Credits Requested for This Project
60.00
0.00
Credits Available for This Project
60.00
0.00
Mitigation Project Name(s)
Coliseum Creek
The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the Section 404 Permit or corresponding 401 Water Quality
Certification for impacts associated with the subject project in Hydrologic Unit 03050103 of the Lower Catawba Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Agreement to Establish the City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Bank in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, dated June, 16, 2004.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at [phone] or
enn.shanaber eg_r(kcharlottenc.gov.
Sincerely,
Charlotte Storm Water Services
Erin Shanaberger, PWS
Mitigation Bank Administrator
cc: File
�s
ll To report pollution or drainage problems, call: 311
;;M1111p-IT,;. http://stormwater.charmeck.org is

Appendix G
NC SAM Form
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
Vest WTP to Franklin WTP Force
1. Project name (if any): Main
3. Applicant/owner name
5. County:
7. River basin:
Charlotte Water
Mecklenburg
Catawba
2. Date of evaluation: 10-19-22
Assessor name/organization:
Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad:
JKM - Hart & Hickman
Stewart Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.266232,-80.873313
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SCE 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 65
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 6 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A\1 J ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
®A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
W
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
M
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
o w
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
Y r
❑I
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
r
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
®D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
0 :5
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS*—**—*********************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach —whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ®Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
®B ®B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
❑A ❑A ❑A
❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
®B ®B ®B
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Mature forest
❑B ❑B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
❑A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
®C ®C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity —assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
The assessment reach is located within a maintained utility easement.

Draft INC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Vest WTP to Franklin WTP Date of Assessment
10-19-22
Force Main
Stream Category Pb2 Assessor Name/Organization
JKM - Hart & Hickman
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All
Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall LOW