Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTri_Rev_Comments_by_HandBenthic Macroinvertebrate Evaluation of Hanging Dog Creek. Cherokee County, North Carolina. 22 November 2010 Overview. Benthic insect samples were collected from three locations on Hanging Dog Creek to assess the ecological effects of winter drawdown at Hiawassee Reservoir. An upper site of Hanging Dog Creek was selected above any potential effects of the winter drawdown; a middle site was selected in a reach that is minimally affected by the drawdown (some flow is maintained for most of the year) and a lower site within the embayment of Hiwassee Reservoir. The lower site is part of the reservoir until Labor Day each year when the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) begins the drawdown process and then becomes lotic, or flowing stream, system until Memorial Day when TVA again begins to refill the reservoir. Water quality and habitat information was collected at each location during this investigation, Table 1 summarizes these data. Minor differences were noted in the water quality of these three locations; although it is interesting to see slightly lower water temperature values at the middle and lower locations. This may be related to water depth as Hanging Dog Creek at the lower site has a very narrow channel with deep pools, whereas the upstream locations are much wider and shallower. Significant differences were noted in the habitat scores. Clearly bank stability and vegetation, light penetration and riparian vegetative zone width were all much reduced at the lower location. Table 1. Water Quality and Habitat Evaluations from three Hanging Dog locations. Cherokee County, North Carolina. 22 November 2010. Parameter/Station Upper Middle Lower Coordinates N35.1124,W84.0676 N35.1179,W84.0661 N35.1317,W84.0677 Water Quality1 Water Temperature (oC) 11.2 10.5 10.2 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) 11.25 11.09 11.25 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 23 22 23 pH (units) 7.42 7.90 7.78 Habitat2 1. Channel Modification 4 4 2 2. Instream Habitat 20 16 14 3 Bottom Substrate 15 12 8 4. Pool Variety 10 10 10 5. Riffle Habitats 14 14 14 6. Bank Stability and Vegetation 14 14 0 7. Light Penetration 10 10 2 8. Riparian Veg. Zone Width 8 8 2 Total Habitat Score 95 88 52 1. Water quality information was collected by the EPA field team. 2. NC Division of Water Quality habitat assessment form for mountain systems. Benthic Macroivertebrates. Benthic insect samples were also collected from each of these locations using the protocols defined by the NC Division of Water Quality. (DWQ 2006). A summary of these data are listed in Table 2 and a complete list of all taxa collected can be seen in Appendix 1 of this report. • Upper Reach. This location was selected above the influence of winter drawdown and to act as reference condition. The overall habitat score from this location was very high (97 points). The stream at this point is very productive with prolific growths of river weed (Podostemum spp). Podostemum is common in many mountain stream systems and offers a unique habitat for many benthic insects. Thirty four EPT taxa were collected from this location and 11 intolerant taxa (Biotic index of 1.0 or less) were collected here as well. These data resulted in a Good bioclassification using the criteria developed by the NC Division of Water Quality. Many taxa were only collected from this upstream location which is very likely related to the fact that this is not affected by lack of flow during full reservoir capacity. Note that many taxa within the mayfly family Ephemerellidae are common or abundant at his upper location, but are reduced in abundance at the middle location and completely eliminated at the lower site. This is also evident for many stonefly taxa as well. Most EPT taxa are rheophilic organisms needing flow for their entire life cycles, once flow is reduced or eliminated these taxa cannot survive. The field team collected several specimens of Ephemerella berneri at this location. E. berneri is listed by the NC Natural Heritage Program as significantly rare and listed as “vulnerable to extirpation” by Morse et al. (1997). • Middle Reach. Data were also collected from a reach of Hanging Dog Creek that maintains some flow during each season. There are no flow records from this reach; therefore it is difficult to determine flow patterns however it is assumed that water does back up to this point during high flow periods (i.e. water retainment within the reservoir). The field team noted the presence of excessive fine sediments within low flow areas (especially stream banks), but clean riffle habitats. In addition we also noted the presence of an incredible number of burrowing mayfly tubes, all empty. The deposition of fine particulate organic material because of reduced flow at this location created a microhabitat favorable to these taxa. The overall habitat score from this location was also very high (88 points). EPT taxa richness and the number of intolerant taxa are very similar to the upstream reference reach and these data also resulted in a Good bioclassification using the DWQ protocols. However EPT abundance declined substantially and the number of dominant taxa in common (common and abundant taxa) was only 53%. Interestingly the number of Trichoptera increased at this location to 17 taxa. Apparently the reduced, or inconsistent, flow pattern within this reach of Hanging Dog Creek does not impact these taxa as severely as mayfly or stonefly taxa. Table 2. Summary of Benthic insect taxa collected from three Hanging Dog Creek locations. Cherokee County NC. 22 November 2010 Taxa/Location Upper Middle Lower Ephemeroptera 12 10 1 Plecoptera 10 6 5 Trichoptera 12 17 5 Misc. Diptera 3 5 2 Chironomidae 8 7 5 Coleoptera 3 3 0 Odonata 1 6 0 Oligochaeta 1 1 1 Megaloptera 2 1 0 Crustacea 0 0 0 Mollusca 2 1 0 Other Miscellaneous tax 1 1 0 Total # Taxa 55 56 19 Total # EPT taxa 34 33 11 Seasonal Correction1 32 31 9 EPT Abundance 168 111 35 No. of intol taxa (BI = 1.0 or less) 11 10 3 Dominant Taxa in Common2 - 53% 13%/18% Bioclassification Good Good Poor 1. DWQ seasonal correction essentially is to remove winter/spring stonefly taxa from results prior to assigning a bioclassification. 2. DIC is a measure of the abundant and common taxa in common between locations. The DIC at the lower reach was calculated for both the upper and middle reaches. • Lower Reach. This embayment reach of Hanging Dog Creek is within the normal capacity of Hiawassee Reservoir and was flowing only during this survey because of the winter drawdown policy of TVA. The riparian canopy was eliminated during construction and maintenance of the reservoir; therefore habitat scores for bank stability and vegetation, light penetration and riparian vegetative zone width were extremely low at this point. During full capacity of the reservoir deposition of fine material from upstream sources occurs at this point. Subsequently during the drawdown periods this fine material is eroded and resuspended. Erosion of this material from newly exposed banks is severe. If drawdown was initiated at Labor Day this reach has been exposed for only 11 weeks. Drift from upstream sources is the only form of recolonization for the benthos within this reach. Taxa richness and EPT abundance values were reduced at this location and dominant in common analyses resulted in only 13% in common with the upper reach and 18% with the middle reach. These data resulted in a Poor bioclassification following a seasonal correction of the data. Significant Observations. Benthic insects were collected from three locations in Hanging Dog Creek to assess the ecological effects of winter drawdown of the Hiawassee Reservoir. The lower most site in the investigation is within the embayment of the reservoir and newly exposed only because of the drawdown policy of TVA. Taxa richness, EPT abundance and the number of intolerant benthic insect taxa were all reduced at the lower reach of this feature. Bioclassification ratings were reduced from Good at both upstream locations to Poor at the downstream reach within the embayment. Taxa richness values and Good bioclassifications were recorded from both upstream locations. Many intolerant taxa were also collected from both of these locations. In addition Ephemerella berneri was also collected at both of these locations. This taxa is listed by the NC Natural Heritage Program as significantly rare and listed as vulnerable to extirpation. References NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 2006. Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Environmental Sciences Section, Biological Assessment Unit. Raleigh, NC. Morse, J.C., B.P. Stark, W.P. McCafferty and K.J. Tennessen. 1997. Southern Appalachian and Other Southeastern Streams at Risk: Implications for Mayflies, Dragonflies and Damselflies, Stoneflies and Caddisflies. In: Aquatic Fauna in Peril: Southeastern Perspective (Benz, G.W. and D.E. Collins, editors), Special publication 1, Southeast Aquatic Research Institute. Lenz Design & Communications, Decatur, GA. 554pp. Appendix 1. Benthic macroivertebrates collected from three Hanging Dog Creek locations. Cherokee County, NC. 22 November 2010 Location Upper Middle Lower Taxa Name (Biotic Index value) Ephemeroptera Family Baetidae Baetis pluto (4.3) A C R Plauditus dubius group (5.8) C Family Baetiscidae Baetisca carolina (3.5) C Family Ephemerellidae Ephemerella berneri (0) C R Ephemerella dorothea (6.0) A Ephemerella rossi group (0) R Serratella deficiens (2.8) C R Family Heptageniidae Epeorus dispar (1.0) C R Heptagenia marginalis (2.3) C Stenacron pallidum (2.7) C C Maccaffertium modestum (5.5) A A Maccaffertium pudicum (2.0) C C Family Leptophebiidae Paraleptophlebia spp (0.9) R Family Oligoneuridae Isonychia spp (3.5) C C Plecoptera Family Chloroperlidae Sweltsa spp (0) R Family Leuctridae Leuctra spp (2.5) A A A Family Peltoperlidae Tallaperla spp (1.2) C R Family Perlidae Acroneuria abnormis (2.1) A Paragnetina media (1.0) C C Perlesta placida (4.7) R Family Perlodidae Isoperla spp (too small to ID) R Heliopicus subvarians (0.8) A A C Family Pteronarcyidae Pteronarcys spp (1.7) R Family Taeniopterygidae Strophopteryx spp (2.7) R R R Taeniopteryx spp (5.4) C C C Trichoptera Family Apataniidae Apatania sp (0.6) C Family Brachycentridae Brachycentrus appalachia (0.1) A R Micrasema charonis (0.8) C Family Glossosomatidae Glossosoma spp (1.6) A A Family Hydropsychidae Cheumatopsyche spp (6.2) A C R Hydropsyche betteni (7.8) R Hydropsyche venularis (5.0) R Symphitopsyche sparna (2.7) A A Symphitopsyche morose (2.8) R C R Family Lepidostomatidae Lepidostoma spp (0.9) C R Family Leptoceridae Ceraclea spp (2.0) R Oecetis spp (4.7) R Setodes spp (0) R Family Limnephilidae Pycnopsyche guttifer (2.6) C Pycnopysche lepida (2.7) R C R Family Philopotamidae Chimarra spp (2.8) A R Dolophilodes spp (0.8) A A A Family Polycentropodidae Nyctiophylax celta (0.7) R Family Psychomyiidae Psychomyia flavida (2.9) R Family Rhyacophilidae Rhyacophila fuscula (1.9) C Family Uenoidae Neophylax spp (pupae) (2.2) R Diptera: Miscellaneous families Family Ceratopogonidae Palmoymia complex (6.9) R Family Empididae (7.6) C R Family Simuliidae Simulium spp (6.0) C C A Family Tipulidae Antocha spp (4.3) R Tipula spp (7.3) A C R Diptera: Chironomidae Brillia spp (5.2) C Cardiocladius spp (5.9) R Conchapelopia group (8.4) R Corynoneura spp (6.0) R R R Cricotopus/Orthocladius sp 51 (3.4) A Eukiefferiella brevicalcar gr (E sp 6) (2.2) R R Nanocladius spp (7.1) C Orthocladius clarkei gr: C/O sp 54 (5.7) R Parametriocnemus lundbecki (3.7) C C R Pseudorthocladius spp (1.5) R Rheotanytarsus spp (5.9) C R Tvetenia bavarica group - E sp1 (3.7) C C R Coleoptera Family Dytiscidae Hydroporus spp (8.6) R Family Elmidae Promoresia tardella (0) A Family Gyrinidae Dineutus spp (5.5) C Family Psephenidae Ectopria nervosa (4.2) R Psephenus herricki (2.4) C C Odonata Family Aeshnidae Boyeria vinosa (5.9) R R Family Calopterygidae Calopteryx spp (7.8) R Family Gomphidae Gomphus spp (5.8) R Gomphus spiniceps (5.1) R Hagenius brevistylus (4.0) R Family Macromiidae Maromia spp (6.2) R Oligochaeta Family Nadidae Nais spp (8.9) R R R Megaloptera Family Corydalidae Nigronia serricornis (5.0) C C Corydalus cornutus (5.2) C Mollusca Family Ancylidae Ferrissia spp (6.6) A C Family Pleuroceridae Leptoxis spp (1.8) A Other Miscellaneous Taxa Hydracarina spp (5.5) R Polyclad Prostoma graecens (6.1) R SUMMARY STATISTICS EPT taxa richness 34 33 11 Total Taxa richness 55 56 19 Number of intolerant taxa (BI = 1.0 or less) 11 10 3 Dominant Taxa in Common - 53% 13%/18% EPT abundance 168 111 35 Bioclassification Good Good Poor