20140843 Ver 1_Summary of Nov 14th Site Meeting_20141211

Strickland, Bev
From: Devane, Boyd
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 11:41 AM
To: Strickland, Bev
Subject: FW: Summary of Site Meeting on November 14, 2014 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Attachments: Final Storm Water and Bridge Plan Signed December 2014.pdf, Pinnacle and HG LLC
extension letter signed.pdf, WR Jule Noland Drive_EEP acceptance.pdf; 31 -2738 - Jule
Noland Property - NCWAM.pdf, Conservation meets and bounds.pdf; Agency
Response December 2014.pdf
Please file this in Jule Noland 14 -0843
From: Wanda Austin [mailto :wandajoyceaustin @gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:44 PM
To: Brown, David W SAW
Cc: Barnett, Kevin; Fox, Tim; Price, Zan (George); Tompkins, Bryan; Leslie, Andrea J; Devane, Boyd; Burdette, Jennifer
a; Brent Pack
Subject: Re: Summary of Site Meeting on November 14, 2014 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Thank you for the opportunity to address the concerns of each of the agencies. The revised storm water plan,
the NCEEP acceptance letter, NC WAM, property evaluation and letter of extension from the buyer are
attached. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Brown, David W SAW <David.W.Browngusace. army. mil> wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Action ID 2013 -02365
Wanda H. Austin, PE - Engineering Services
Sylva, NC 28779
Wanda Austin,
Thanks for meeting with representatives of the Corps and NCDENR -DWR at the site to discuss remaining
outstanding items need for the 401 and 404 permitting actions of the proposed commercial development project
on the property at the northeast corner of Jule Noland Drive and Russ Avenue in Waynesville. This e -mail is a
summary of our discussion of the outstanding items. Unless otherwise noted below, submit
documents /plans /drawings addressing these items to both the Corps and DWR.
1) Plans /designs showing storm drainage system per 401 storm water requirements. These documents are
currently being worked on and will be submitted to DWR when completed.
2) Mitigation Plan. DWR needs to have NCEEP's letter stating NCEEP is willing to accept payment for
compensatory mitigation. Please submit a copy of the letter to Kevin Barnett at DWR.
3) Purpose and Need of northern 0.7 acre outparcel along Dellwod Road (US Highway 19). No purpose and
need has been provided for the impacts (approximately 0.1 -0.2 acres of fill to wetlands) associated with this
outparcel. Development of this parcel is not dependent on the proposed commercial/retail development of the

parcel along Jule Noland Drive.
DWR and the Crops consider the outparcel independent of the proposed development along Jule Noland Drive,
therefore the proposed fill of wetlands joining the two parcels is not justified.
Provide documentation that the outparcel does support the purpose and need of the proposed commercial/retail
development along Jule Noland Drive.
I'
Provide a separate purpose and need for the outparcel.
If the proposed fill is removed from the existing plans, please update project plans /drawing as needed.
Also, show accesses to the outparcel from Dellwood Road and account for any additional impacts to
jurisdictional features, as needed.
4) Alternative Analysis / Avoidance and Minimization. The applicant submitted information regarding real
estate parcels in the area for 9 acre parcels. The proposed commercial development requires 4 -5 acres. Please
submit information and alternative analysis regarding real estate parcels in the area for other available 4 -6 acre
parcels.
5) The applicant submitted an option to purchase and contract to sell between Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
(seller) and Pinnacle Properties One, LLC (buyer). This document does not state the buyer will develop the
property as a commercial/retail grocery facility per the applicant's purpose and need. Please provide
documentation that the buyer plans to construct a commercial/retail grocery facility based upon the drawings
and plans submitted to the Corps and DWR.
6) The above noted option to purchase and contract to sell expires on November 30, 2014. Please submit a
document that this document will be in effect beyond November 30, 2014 and what will be the new expiration
date.
7) Mitigation. USFWS has recommended a 2:1 ratio for compensatory mitigation for the current proposed
impacts to wetlands. Therefore, 2.4 acres of wetland mitigation will be required to offset the proposed 1.2 acres
of wetland impacts. This ratio will be the required ratio for compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts unless
the applicant can provide reasoning /data for a lower ratio. It was suggested the applicant submit NC Wetland
Assessment Method (NC WAM) as data to support reasoning for a lower ratio.
•'
Provide additional mitigation options and documentation outlining the option(s) for use in conjunction with the
proposed payment to NCEEP which could lower the recommended 2:1 ratio. An option discussed was
preservation of the remaining wetlands at the property through restrictive conservation easements. The
conservation easements will need to held by an independent 3rd party and be in perpetuity.
Please provide the information requested by January 16, 2015. If you have any questions feel free to contact me
or Kevin Barnett at DWR.
Thanks again,
David Brown, PG
Regulatory Specialist /Geologist

828 -271 -7980, ext. 232
david. w.browngus ace. army. mil
USACE Wilmington District - Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 -5006
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
�.r Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F -1078
December 11, 2014
Mr. John Harmon
Harmon Graham Properties
PO Box 120
Waynesville, North Carolina
Reference: Report of Wetland Assessment Services
Jule Noland Property
Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 31 -2738
Dear Mr. Harmon:
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to provide the results of a Wetland Determination
conducted for the above referenced site. Our services were provided in accordance with ECS
Proposal No. 08- 17399P.
Background
The approximate 9.832 -acre undeveloped tract is located between Jule Noland Drive and
Dellwood Road, west of Lake Junaluska in Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina. The
Haywood County Parcel Identification Number associated with the site is 8616 -49 -2446. Based
on information provided by Ms. Wanda Austin, a wetland delineation was completed on the
property in February 2014. The delineation report, completed by Altamont Environmental Inc.,
was utilized as part of this evaluation, and can be found as an attachment to this report
(Attachment 1). The aforementioned report identified a 3.28 acre wetland within the floodplain
portion of the site. As part of the proposed development of the property, impacts are proposed
to the wetland. Per federal regulations, mitigation for the impact to the wetland is required. An
assessment of the wetland using the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method ( NCWAM)
has been requested to approximate the quality and function of the wetland, and to determine if
the mitigation ratio suggested by the permitting agencies is consistent with the wetland quality
and function. The NCWAM Wetland Assessment Form and the NCWAM Wetland Rating Sheet
are found in Attachment 2.
ECS personnel conducted a field investigation of the site on December 9, 2014.
North Carolina Wetland Assessment Overview
NCWAM is a process that began in 2003, and was developed by an interagency team of federal
and state agency staff. The purpose of the NCWAM is to provide a method to assess the
function of a wetland relative to a reference condition for each of the 16 North Carolina general
wetland types. The intent was to develop a process that is accurate, consistent, rapid,
observational, and scientifically based. NCWAM was created to be used for project planning,
alternatives analysis, compliance and enforcement, mitigation planning, and tracking functional
assessment.
1900 Hendersonville Road, Suite 10, Asheville, NC 28803 • T: 828 - 665 -2307 • F: 828 - 665 -8128 • www.ecslimited.com
ECS Mid - Atlantic, LLC • ECS Carolinas, LLP • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Illinois, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Texas, LLP

Report of Wetland Determination Services
Jule Noland Property
Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 31 -2738
December 11, 2014
Literature Review
ECS reviewed information relative to the site prior to the site visit, these included:
• United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic map of the site. The topographic
map does depict surface waters on the site, including two blue line streams which are
Mauney Cove Branch and Factory Branch.
• ECS reviewed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife, National Wetlands Inventory Map of the site. The
map does not depict wetlands on the site.
• ECS reviewed the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey of
Haywood County. Soils depicted on the soil survey include Dellwood -Urban Land complex
(DhA), Dillsboro loam (DsB,DsC), Evard -Cowee complex (EvD, EvE), and Saunook -Urban
land complex (SfC). No soils mapped on the site are identified on the Hydric Soils List for
Haywood County.
• ECS reviewed the wetland delineation report completed by Altamont Environmental Inc.,
which included an assessment of the vegetation, hydrology, and soils identified at the site.
NCWAM Findings and Conclusions
ECS visited the site on December 9, 2014 to perform the NCWAM. Review of the vegetation,
soils, and hydrology within the wetland area were compared to the findings of the Altamont
Environmental Inc., report. ECS concurred with those findings.
ECS utilized the Dichotomous Key to General North Carolina Wetland Types that accompanies
the NCWAM User Manual, Version 4.1, in order to classify the wetland type that had been
previously delineated. A classification of Bottomland Hardwood Forest was assigned to the
wetland. The wetland is dominated by herbaceous species, which is not typically associated
with a Bottomland Hardwood Forest. No evidence of organics or muck was identified during the
evaluation. Past disturbance to the wetland via clearing and maintenance, and an adjacent
berm /gravel path are stressing the wetland and not allowing for the successful growth of
hardwood species. It is anticipated that short periods of inundation occur, with surface flow to
drainage features located within the wetland, and subsequent drainage into Factory Branch
located on the northern property boundary. The wetland did not demonstrate indicators of long
periods of inundation.
ECS compiled data obtained from the site and incorporated that data into the NCWAM Wetland
Assessment Form. Through a series of metrics associated with different attributes and site
characteristics, a rating of the wetland is measured and provided through the NCWAM Wetland
Rating Sheet. The rating for the wetland evaluated on the project site was given an Overall
Wetland Rating of LOW. ECS would like to note that data incorporated into the rating system
was derived from professional opinions obtained at the site, and the snapshot of the site on the
day it was evaluated.

Report of Wetland Determination Services
Jule Noland Property
Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 31 -2738
December 11, 2014
This report and associated attachments, along with the NCWAM results, can be provided to the
permitting authorities to support the opinion of lowering the mitigation ratio assigned to the
wetland. ECS cannot guarantee concurrence of our opinion with regulatory authorities.
Closure
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us
at (828) 665 -2307 if you have any questions concerning this letter.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PWS
Senior Soil /Wetland Scientist
/P
stfiVZA. Roth, CHMM
Environmental Services Manager
Attachments: Wetland Delineation Report by Altamont Environmental Inc., 2014
NCWAM Wetland Assessment Form, NCWAM Wetland Rating Sheet
3

ATTACHMENT 1
Wetland Delineation Report by Altamont Environmental Inc., 2014

'4
wt
Luc..:
I
H Y D R O E CO LOG Y
Jule Noland Wetland Delineation
Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
2511 Midland Road
Shelbyville, Tennessee 37160
February 14, 2014
Prepared for
John Harmon
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
2511 Midland Road
Shelbyville, Tennessee 37160
Project Number 2504
Prepared by
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
231 Haywood Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828.281.3350

Wetland Delineation
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
Jule Noland Wetland Delineation
Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
2511 Midland Road
Shelbyville, Tennessee 37100
February 14, 2014
P;\Harrnon, John \Wetland polineation -Jule Noland \Wetland Delineation Report.Doex
February 14, 2014
Page li
Natalie Bouchard,
G. Alexander Price, P.E.

Wetland Delineation
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
Table of Contents
February 14, 2014
Page iii
1.0
Property Owner Information ......................................................................................... ............................... 1
2.0
Introduction ................................................................................................................... ............................... 2
3.0
Property Information .................................................................................................... ............................... 3
3.1 U.S. Geologic Survey and North Carolina OneMap ........................................ ............................... 3
3.2 Property Survey Plat ......................................................................................... ..............................3
3.3 U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Map ....................................................... ............................... 3
3.4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory ......... ............................... 4
3.5 U.S. National Flood Insurance Program Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map ............................... 4
4.0
Site Investigations ........................................................................................................ ............................... 5
4.1 Wetland Determination Site Investigation ..................................................... ............................... 5
4.2 Wetland Delineation Site Investigation .......................................................... ............................... 5
4.2.1 Methods ............................................................................................................. ............................... 5
4.2.2 Investigation Results .......................................................................................... ..............................5
5.0
Conclusions .................................................................................................................... ..............................7
Figures
1. Site Map
2. Site Aerial Map
3. Wetland Area Map
Tables
1. Data Point Latitude and Longitude
Appendices
A. Haywood County Property Record Card
B. Survey Plat
C. USDA Web Soil Survey
D. USFS National Wetlands Inventory
E. Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map
F. Representative Photographs
G. Wetland Determination Data Forms
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation -Jule Noland \Wetland Delineation Report.Docx

Wetland Delineation
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
1.0 Property Owner Information
Name: Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
Mail: 2511 Midland Road Shelbyville, Tennessee 37160
Phone: [phone]
Email: belle7233 @gmail.com
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation -Jule Noland \Wetland Delineation Report.Docx
February 14, 2014
Page 1

Wetland Delineation
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
2.0 Introduction
February 14, 2014
Page 2
Altamont was retained by Harmon Graham Properties, LLC (Harmon) to determine, and delineate if existent,
wetland(s) located on the property located at Jule Noland Drive, Waynesville, Haywood County, North
Carolina (Subject Site). Harmon expressed interest in developing the Subject Site. If wetland(s) are located
on the Subject Site, permits prior to construction and /or mitigation fees may be required. Consequently,
Harmon requested that a wetland delineation be performed on the Subject Site.
A wetland delineation is performed by qualified professionals. However, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
( USACE) must complete a jurisdictional determination to identify the presence or absence of jurisdictional
waters, including wetlands on a site. According to USACE Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June
26, 2008, "An approved jurisdictional determination is an official USACE determination that jurisdictional
"waters of the United States," or "navigable waters of the united States ", or both, are either present or
absent on a particular site. An approved jurisdictional determination precisely identifies the limits of those
waters on the project site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act /Rivers and Harbors Act
of 1899." Ajurisdictional determination by the USACE is necessary prior to submitting permits to impact
wetlands or open waters. Once the USACE has reviewed the wetland delineation report prepared herein, the
USACE will visit the Subject Site to issue a jurisdictional determination.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation -Jule Noland \Wetland Delineation Report.Docx

Wetland Delineation
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
3.0 Property Information
February 14, 2014
Page 3
The Subject Site is located between Jule Noland Drive and Dellwood Road in Waynesville, Haywood County,
North Carolina. According to the Haywood County Geographic Information Services (GIS), the Subject Site is
identified by parcel identification number 8616 -49 -2446, and is an approximately 9.076 -acre undeveloped
parcel. The Haywood County Property Record Card is included as Appendix A.
3.1 U.S. Geologic Survey and North Carolina OneMap
The location of the Subject Site outlined on the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5- minute quadrangle map is
included as Figure 1. A site aerial map with aerial imagery from North Carolina OneMap (NC OneMap) is
included as Figure 2. The NC OneMap 2012 hydrology data identifies that Mauney Cove Branch flows along
the northwestern Subject Site boundary to Factory Branch, which flows into Lake Junaluska approximately
900 feet east of the Subject Site.
3.2 Property Survey Plat
According to the survey plat recorded in Haywood County Registry in Plat Cabinet "C ", Slot 4325, the Subject
Site is approximately 9.832- acres, which is slightly larger than the area reported on the Haywood County GIS
website. The Subject Site is bound by Dellwood Road and an unnamed parcel to the northeast, the Wayne
Robinson parcel and the Jacqueline M. Hayes parcel to the northwest, Jule Noland Drive to the south, Russ
Avenue to the west, and the Clifford L. Bolin parcel to the east. A Bojangles' restaurant is located on the
Clifford L. Bolin parcel. A peninsula of the Subject Site extends east and is bound by the Clifford L. Bolin
parcel and the Waynesville Christian Fellowship parcel to the north, Jule Noland Drive to the south, and the
Lewis N. Green parcel to the east. The survey plat identifies Mauney Cove Branch along the northwestern
property boundary. Mauney Cove Branch meanders on and off the Subject Site and converges with Factory
Branch on the northern property border. Factory Branch then meanders on and off the Subject Site along
the northeastern property boundary along Dellwood Road. Factory Branch continues east along Dellwood
Road until entering a concrete box culvert.
The plat identifies an 8 -inch sanitary sewer line and 20 -foot sewer easement parallel to the northwestern
property boundary adjacent to Mauney Cove Branch, and the northeastern property boundary adjacent to
Factory Branch. An 18 -foot walking trail easement lies within the 20 -foot sewer easement. A 45 -foot road
and utility public right of way is identified along Jule Noland Drive. An additional 20 -foot sewer easement
connects the main 20 -foot easement line to a manhole located on Dellwood Road. A 20 -foot utility
easement connects the road and utility easement from Jule Noland Drive to a fire hydrant located on the
Clifford L. Bolin parcel. A 25 -foot utility easement connects the road and utility easement from Jule Noland
Drive to Russ Avenue. The survey plat is included as Appendix B.
3.3 U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Map
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Cooperative Soil Survey Web Soil Survey (WSS) report for
the Subject Site is included as Appendix C. According to the WSS, the majority of the Subject Site (3.2 acres)
is Dellwood -Urban land complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded (DhA), and 2.5 acres of the
Subject Site is Evard -Cowee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes (EvE). The remaining Subject Site area is
comprised of urban land complexes and Dillsboro loam soils.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation -Jule Noland \Wetland Delineation Report.Docx

Wetland Delineation
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
February 14, 2014
Page 4
3.4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory
According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), no wetland areas
were identified on the Subject Site. According to the USFS, these data were collected in the 1980s.
Consequently, the NWI may not accurately reflect current site conditions. The USFS National Wetlands
Inventory map is included as Appendix D.
3.5 U.S. National Flood Insurance Program Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map
According to the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map ( DFIRM), a
Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA)- mapped stream was not identified on the Subject Site.
Consequently, a FEMA- mapped floodplain was not identified on the Subject Site. The DFIRM identified
Factory Branch, along the Subject Site's northwestern border. The DFIRM map is included as Appendix E.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation -Jule Noland \Wetland Delineation Report.Docx

Wetland Delineation February 14, 2014
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC Page 5
4.0 Site Investigations
4.1 Wetland Determination Site Investigation
Altamont conducted a preliminary wetland determination investigation on January 14, 2014. This visual
investigation included: examining general Subject Site topography, digging soil test pits, taking photographs,
observing vegetation, collecting global positioning system (GPS) data points, and documenting the
approximate extent of the wetland area. During the preliminary determination Altamont personnel marked
the approximate boundary of the wetland area with pin flags. Altamont personnel used the USACE Wetland
Determination Data Forms — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (data forms) as a general guide to
determine if the area was a wetland. However, Altamont did not complete the data forms in sufficient detail
to complete a wetland delineation. Consequently, a wetland delineation site visit was necessary.
4.2 Wetland Delineation Site Investigation
Altamont completed the wetland delineation site investigation on February 5, 2014. Representative
photographs are included as Appendix F.
4.2.1 Methods
Altamont personnel, Natalie Bouchard, and BDY Environmental, LLC (BDY) personnel, Chris Flemming,
conducted the wetland delineation. Natalie Bouchard, E.I.T., was trained in wetland delineation techniques
in 2013. Chris Flemming, M.S., was trained in wetland delineation techniques in 2007. Altamont partnered
with BDY to complete the wetland delineation. The investigation consisted of the following:
• Walking the Subject Site boundaries. Note: property boundaries were not staked or established and
the property boundaries were approximated from available Haywood County GIS information.
• Digging soil test pits throughout the Subject Site.
• Observing vegetation.
• Taking photographs.
• Completing data forms at five locations to document wetland and upland conditions on the Site.
• Hanging flagging to mark the wetland boundary.
• Collecting GPS points at each wetland boundary flag and at each location where the data forms were
completed. Altamont personnel used a Trimble XH 2005 Series Pocket PC global positioning system
(GPS) unit to collect point locations. According to the manufacturer, the GPS unit has a subfoot
accuracy.
4.2.2 Investigation Results
The Subject Site is predominately shrubby vegetation with areas of open fields. A small section of surface
vegetation appeared to have been recently removed and stockpiled on the southwest corner of the Subject
Site. Mauney Cove Branch was identified parallel to the northwestern property boundary on the Subject Site.
This stream runs northeast to the point where it converges with Factory Branch at a location slightly north of
the Subject Site. Factory Branch was observed to continue east from the confluence until reaching a
roadway culvert on Dellwood Road just north of the Subject Site.
The Subject Site is bounded by Jule Noland Drive to the south, Russ Avenue on the west, Mauney Cove
Branch and Factory Branch to the north, and commercial development to the east. A stormwater culvert was
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation -Jule Noland \Wetland Delineation Report.Docx

Wetland Delineation
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
February 14, 2014
Page 6
observed along the southern property boundary. The culvert appears to discharge stormwater from Jule
Noland Drive onto the Subject Site.
Altamont observed a gravel road /walking trail within what appeared to be the 20- foot -wide sewer easement,
which includes the 18- foot -wide walking trail easement, as depicted on the Survey Plat (Appendix B). The
trail appeared to be elevated above the existing grade on the Subject Site in that location. This gravel road
appears to be acting as a berm between the Subject Site and Mauney Cove Branch and appears to be
preventing stormwater runoff from the Subject Site from entering the branch along the northwest property
boundary. A drainage ditch was observed on the southeastern side of the gravel road, parallel to the road
and Mauney Cove Branch. The ditch appeared to discharge to Factory Branch. The site aerial map is
included as Figure 2.
Altamont and BDY delineated the boundaries of the wetland area on the Subject Site by observing
vegetation, hydrology, and the soils. During the site visit Altamont and BDY completed a total of five data
forms at five different locations on the Subject Site. Two data forms were completed at upland locations
(UPL -1 and UPL -2), and three data forms were completed at wetland locations (WL -1, WL -2, and WL -3).
Copies of the completed data forms are included as Appendix G. Areas where all three wetland indicators
(vegetation, hydrology, and soils) were present were classified as a wetland. Notably, the soils observed at
data form location WL -2 were somewhat marginal, and are likely still developing wetland features. Black
concretions were observed in the upper 4 inches of the soil profile. Notwithstanding the concretions, the
soils appeared to be high chroma.
The wetland delineation identified a 3.28 -acre wetland situated in the northwest portion of the Subject Site
adjacent to the gravel roadway parallel to Mauney Cove Branch (see Figure 3). The wetland area does not
include the gravel road, as this area is elevated and appears to be dry. Altamont and BDY hung flags at the
wetland boundary location, and used the GPS unit to document the flag location. Each flag is numbered in
the field, and likewise numbered in Figure 3. The latitude and longitude of the GPS points collected on
February 5, 2014 are included in Table 1.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation -Jule Noland \Wetland Delineation Report.Docx

Wetland Delineation February 14, 2014
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC Page 7
5.0 Conclusions
Altamont and BDY have performed a wetland delineation and determined a 3.28 -acre wetland is situated on
the Subject Site. Altamont recommends this report be submitted to the USACE for a jurisdictional
determination.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation -Jule Noland \Wetland Delineation Report.Docx

FIGURES

I �� I: -. ���, I . ti i' ` v°`�, �y t, � •,, �'. ti'�l . " �; _ _ ._FinvCrli
,
k
u I �
L ttc.k� rr° i rr wfr
V
-s9 sI' ��. L'i arii Knat
:III. I�-
-
;'� ,� f _ Y. ✓ _ —` .'S =� - !. � Subject Site .� „� _ _ �• ,
IAL
4�� � ,� �� h ■ ++ ;>:_� X1,1 _ {�` ''
+w�l S I•'� r _ 7. .s x 1pe+l�,�rl . ,y g ,1�' `I+
'w!'Wfi_ 111 16 • _
s
Ctllfe{y BMsS °14 w..
3o a ?555
IF
�d mmiC�' G6 U8 k
7� :. yMa�lr �+fGrs'1
.WN
X AA
zi
ter.. -� -y r .-� -, • ', r
4` �l� _ � � 1141, I �T :r. � Ur..� I dai•-
•rt .T� 7 J 'I, r! >�716�' •!• y.�d 1! ' ¢ ��.��,
,1 II
Legend { >•l�� ; F.$:
Subject Parcel
Data Sources:
USGS Topography - Clyde and Dellwood Quadrangle
Subject Parcel: Haywood County GIS u '
F r, v1 I11e,f• & r,lnr,u r c,i,v
112% ZAI '017,0 —C R2l ?M1 35%.
xwwr, ar��s w�n�rwasrwraw 1rwrlas„.ctw
DRAWNI BY:I NATALIEI BOUCHARD SCALE
PROJECTI MANAGER:I ZANI PRICE Feet
CLIENT:I HARMONI GRAHAMI PROPERTIES,I LLC 0 1,000 2,000
OATEN 02/11/2014
SITEI LOCATIOM MAP
JULElNOLANDlPROPERY
HAYWOOD! COUNTY,! NORTH! CAROLINA
P: \HARMON,I JOHN \ WETLAND I DELINEATION -1 JULEI NOLAND \FIGURES
FIGURE I
1
Y. 4 GTroa
SITEI LOCATIOM MAP
JULElNOLANDlPROPERY
HAYWOOD! COUNTY,! NORTH! CAROLINA
P: \HARMON,I JOHN \ WETLAND I DELINEATION -1 JULEI NOLAND \FIGURES
FIGURE I
1

• • ��,F;�� (��,', . I' .� � rte.
DELLWOOD RD
ELD N.INq
Factory Branc
F
�y a �a
2575 256
i
?La
1.> � k� e
Unal uska
JULE NOLAND DR 2585
Gravel Road
LU
G z
U- Q CPNpLEFt y
i
Legend
Subject Parcel n ,' Data Sources:
Hydrology Hydrology - NC OneMap 2012
5 -ft Contours
Orhoimagery - NC OneMap 2010
4 Roads - NCDOT 2007
Roads Contours - NCDOT 2005
SITEIAERIALIMAP FIGURE
w�r�r ,ar��w�n�rwa•��ranrA.a�..caa - )
JULEINOLANDIPROPERY L
DRAWNIBY:INATALIEIB000HARD HAYWOODI COUNTY,I NORTHI CAROLINA
PROJECTI MANAGER:I ZANI PRICE SCALE
Feet
CLIENT) HARMONI GRAHAMI PROPERTIES,I LLC 0 200 400
DATE:I 02/03/2014 PAHARMON,I JOHN\ WETLANDI DELINEATIONI -1 JULEI NOLAND \FIGURES

COUNTY RD 2635 2 N
�-4 a:f
All
Co Fac
-0 tory Branch
. UPL2�
23
22—
Wetland Area 3.28 Acres WL 3 19 -
18 �
WL2
3 UPL1
1 2
JULE NOLAND DR
,J#r _
u .
2595
2615
Legend
Notes:
1. "GPS" = global positioning system.
Wetland Points
2. Field investigation and wetland boundary, wetland, upland, and GPS verification ponts were
• Wetland Boundary Points
completed on February 5, 2014. Points were collected with a Trimble XH 2005 Series Pocket PC.
A Upland Points
3. "UPL" indicates an upland data point. Refer to Wetland Determination Data Form for more detailed
information.
• GPS Verification Points
4. "WL" indicates a wetland data point. Refer to Wetland Determination Data Form for more detailed
Wetland Boundary
information.
Hydrology
5. "GPS Verification Points" were collected on the Bojangles' dumpster corners to verify the accuracy
Subject Parcel
of the GPS unit.
6. Data sources are as follows: hydrology and orthoimagery data from NC OneMap 2012; parcel from
5 -ft Contours
Haywood County GIS; roads from NCDOT 2007; 5 -foot contours from NCDOT 2005.
•
FIGURE
WETLANDS LOCATION
n ?a y?I. 5q
;r. ..r n-_
* + saw
/�
w,.wr,ar��w�n�rwas�wrawrk
JULEI NOLANDI PROPERTY
{
DRAWNI By:I NATALIEI BOUCHARD
SCALE
HAYWOODI COUNTY,I NORTHI CAROLINA
�J
PROJECTI MANAGER:I ZANI PRICE
Feet
CLIENT) MOUNTAINI ENVIRONMENTALI SERVICES
0 100 200
DATE:I 02/11/2014
P:\HARMON,I JOHN \WETLANDI DELINEATIONI -1 JULEI NOLAND \FIGURES

TABLE

Table 1.
Data Point Latitude and Longitude
Dellwood Road, Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina
Sample Point
Point Type
Latitude
I Longitude
Decimal Degrees
1
Wetland Boundary
35.5235
- 82.9873
2
Wetland Boundary
35.5236
- 82.9871
3
Wetland Boundary
35.5236
- 82.9870
4
Wetland Boundary
35.5237
- 82.9869
5
Wetland Boundary
35.5238
- 82.9868
6
Wetland Boundary
35.5239
- 82.9868
7
Wetland Boundary
35.5240
- 82.9866
8
Wetland Boundary
35.5239
- 82.9864
9
Wetland Boundary
35.5239
- 82.9863
10
Wetland Boundary
35.5238
- 82.9861
11
Wetland Boundary
35.5237
- 82.9860
12
Wetland Boundary
35.5238
- 82.9858
13
Wetland Boundary
35.5238
- 82.9856
14
Wetland Boundary
35.5238
- 82.9854
15
Wetland Boundary
35.5240
- 82.9852
16
Wetland Boundary
35.5241
- 82.9853
17
Wetland Boundary
35.5241
- 82.9854
18
Wetland Boundary
35.5246
- 82.9853
19
Wetland Boundary
35.5247
- 82.9853
20
Wetland Boundary
35.5247
- 82.9852
21
Wetland Boundary
35.5248
- 82.9854
22
Wetland Boundary
35.5248
- 82.9856
23
Wetland Boundary
35.5248
- 82.9858
24
Wetland Boundary
35.5248
- 82.9859
25
Wetland Boundary
35.5248
- 82.9860
26
Wetland Boundary
35.5247
- 82.9861
27
Wetland Boundary
35.5246
- 82.9862
28
Wetland Boundary
35.5245
- 82.9863
29
Wetland Boundary
35.5244
- 82.9865
30
Wetland Boundary
35.5243
- 82.9866
31
Wetland Boundary
35.5243
- 82.9867
32
Wetland Boundary
35.5242
- 82.9869
33
Wetland Boundary
35.5241
- 82.9870
34
Wetland Boundary
35.5240
- 82.9871
35
Wetland Boundary
35.5239
- 82.9872
BJ 1
GPS Verification
35.5242
- 82.9852
BJ 2
GPS Verification
35.5242
- 82.9853
BJ 3
GPS Verification
35.5242
- 82.9852
BJ 4
GPS Verification
35.5242
- 82.9853
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation - Jule Nola nd \Sample_Points_Lat_Long Page 1 of 2

Table 1.
Data Point Latitude and Longitude
Dellwood Road, Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina
Sample Point
Point Type
Latitude
I Longitude
Decimal Degrees
UPL 1
Upland
35.5237
- 82.9859
UPL 2
Upland
35.5249
- 82.9853
WL 1
Wetland
35.5240
- 82.9864
WL 2
Wetland
35.5239
- 82.9855
WL 3
Wetland
35.5247
- 82.9858
Notes:
1. Field investigation and wetland boundary, wetland, upland, and GPS verification ponts were
completed on February 5, 2013.
2. Points were collected with a Trimble XH 2005 Series Pocket PC.
3. Datum: North American Datum (NAD) 1983.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation -Jule Noland \Sample_Points_Lat_Long Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX A
HAYWOOD COUNTY PROPERTY RECORD CARD

(D
qqt
qIT
N
6
�
�
(D
00
0
LL
r-
0
�
�
�
U
\
2
L
F-
ry
2
E
O
±
I
�
<
I
ƒ
O
2
O
5
±
<
I
c
�
c
2
<
0
/
\
2
\
Z
p
w
\
5
»
E
w
I
«
/
/ /
�
C-0
/
/ ƒ /
E
0
2
£
/ / \
I
i
CO
�
/
Z
�
L
�
<
/
Of
0
2 \
0 0 ƒ
# 2
%E \ /
k <
$ � ƒ
c \ o
2
\ �
U)
co
U)
/ z
I
U \
I ±
\ O
LU Z
0 / 0
Z o o c R
S
\ § /
E \
\ \
� � � 2
0 § ) \ \
Q I y R R
/ \ / N CO
\ / 0 ^ / E 7
E m 2 2 2 2/ 7
o k
/ \ / \ a a
/ 7 / 7 (n M \
C \ " 2 \ \ % \
\ 3 / 3 < / / /
22 \ \0E
\i\j \\
�\
\ )E
/
'2 0
\
�'k'E)©
/o0
a ..
1 ,!;(f)
\ \ \\ / \\
\
ƒ
(§{] # / {}
0 rf�s
z
\ ®! \ ^` {\
/r \ {5 E'2

APPENDIX B
SURVEY PLAT

om
Wil EtvV, "
.. . . . ....... .................. ------
... . .........
5.4
r.
....... I ..... .... aajte
RMO'ltllffil 11
mrj
11 2n"wp!t.4 E_ MI
ew

APPENDIX C
USDA WEB SOIL SURVEY

Z
m
�1
060££6£
M.65.85 oZ8
AliM
f� tyr
M
o,
m
o—
M
O
m
U
L
0
O
z m
� � M
Q �
, ML
:3
O O
U o
a H
o
m
= M
a
m
0
U)
U
M
W
M
f~1
o
0
M../T.65 oZ8 M
z
M
M
N
Ob0££6£
Z
M
066Z£6£ 066ZE6£ 068Z£6£ ObBZ£6£
M ,.65 ,8S oZ8 O O
N
r ° O O
N a
o
M
��( N
_ o
z
N
M
N
T
N
3
U)
U i.
= m
0 0)
U a
i
m
n
o
z
a
L
N
Oo
X
O
C_
M �
R
Q
O
pp
t0
O
N
o O
N
U
W
O
O
N •>
O
o
y •0
o
o
fL y
7 �
o
C
R O
Z�
z U
M
M..LT.6S
oz8
�h

r0
c
O
m
U
s
0
0
z
Q
T (B
c d
3 LI
O
U .,
a �
3
T
N
S
0
r�
Z
O
r
O
LL
Z
a
c
Z
LU
0
LU
a
O
C �
c
N N N
U O c N
U OU N
U O
a
U co d
a co
O
, m a co
N E cu m E
w O C N E
'n.
c0
O N E 3 N
w o t 3
m
-cno
° o
c >o, c c
O
O wT O N O
a
n
co m o co
m E m'Ecu
o 7c � =0
rn N n C U
01 E N N
c rna E
C
>i (6 O o U7
cu
W E a N
i
N
G
O)
N �
O
C
0
w 7
o
U O
U n U
p L
o
(6
E
a
[n N ,n
.N m
o a w E
ON
c =!
� a -
O
N
O i Lo
Mme.
(6
N N
O O y
6
— Y N
o m E
c M
a N
(n
N cn
a N N
m
o � -
(D U,
E
U.Nw
n
-r d
L
fpn
N O
i
C
N
'O
r6
N
N U
7
r6
c
m 3 (D
c co
o
� �
=3 •o `o
U
fL6 -C N
>>
rn 0
— O
N
in
o N a C U
a
J>
(6 Q
z
d Q p C
m
N
n
O
a p
oa
I
00 O
m
N
p N
..-
>1 N
U) N
7 C
loll O y E
a N
N
C
p
N 7
fn
N O c
L � �6
O U O N
; U 0 i
fn
(6 c6
N N
o
o N 0
7
a .� w6 N U
c6 o y
a E
cn U
2 a`6< cc)
i
O
G
O)
C
0
U
p
o
co
N a n
3 c o
y
ON
O p
U
O
U
c
U
N
-
6
— Y N
o m E
L
a
r6
cn -0 O
I
O M
E
T
C
ra °
O
S
E cn
m
(D -
Q
U)
a
(D
p d
3 co
i
T U
o
a
F3
.
c i w
O Q '06
I
!
c
o-
in
m
a
m
o
N
n
O
CO p_ N
co
oa
I
00 O
O
N
p N
a
3
T 41
a
O
loll O y E
a N
N
C13
S
0
(n
Y
� c
O
J Q
O
.LD
O N O
rn
o
! r6
m
Q
Q
`m
n
� m
o o >
6-0- p
a
m
a
co
�
i
Q
a
m
a M
L N
>
u) N
E cu
CL
Q N
O N
o $
7
0
N O
� o E
..
0 0
C/5 U)
cn O
� N
H U ._ O
V CO
O O
N N
O d
N d
T
m
Z
0
o
� m
— r0
o N
rn p
o
� U
O
m
z
N
Vl
U N
3 is
O
y O
d
3 y
C
m O
Z U
�Idl
fA
�
V1
CL
m
LL
U
@
r
_m
L
a
@
m
m O
T
C
C
=
0
S
y
m
O
m
Q
.a
in
m
E
m
o
CC
o
�° a
m
O
U) v>
L
> O
a
co
N O C m
rn @ O
5
cn
Z)
m
2i
O
J Q
� m
a
o $
c
0
m
o
f/1
O
m
c
y
o
Q
m
O_
U)
y
N
a°
... .-.
° a
...
N
N
E
3
co
a
-O 0
> >
CL a
>
y
m
a
m
0
.
d
a
T
c6
o o
`
o
m
3:
m
'E
°
=
o
0-
o
CL
°
w
a
o
a
U)
o
m m
m
3
O
3
0
>
>
= LL
o
O
O
o
y
O U
N0
Q
0
(n rn
0
rn
C O
o co m U
U
(7
r.7
J J 2E
2i
2E
N
a
O
of
m
rn
m
U)
N
rn
C
cn
"O O
u) rn
d
g
d
p Y
0
y
Q
V CO
O O
N N
O d
N d
T
m
Z
0
o
� m
— r0
o N
rn p
o
� U
O
m
z
N
Vl
U N
3 is
O
y O
d
3 y
C
m O
Z U
�Idl

Soil Map— Haywood County Area, North Carolina
MapxUnihLegend
Subject–Parcel
HaywoodvCountyArea ,�NorthvCarolina�NC606)
MapxUnitxSymbol
MapWnitNName
AcresNinv4O1
Percentxofv4O1
5
Udorthents -Urban land
0.3
3.6%
complex, 2 to 50 percent
slopes
DhA
Dellwood -Urban land complex,
3.2
34.7%
0 to 3 percent slopes,
occasionally flooded
1.8
19.6%
DsB
Dillsboro loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
DsC
Dillsboro loam, 8 to 15 percent
0.8
8.3%
slopes
2.3%
DuC
Dillsboro -Urban land complex,
0.2
2 to 15 percent slopes
EvD
Evard -Cowee complex, 15 to 30
0.2
2.4%
percent slopes
EvE
Evard -Cowee complex, 30 to 50
2.5
27.9%
percent slopes
SfC
Saunook -Urban land complex,
0.1
1.1%
2 to 15 percent slopes
Total s4orArea%ofJnterest
9.1
100.0%
USDA NaturalJ2esources Web Soil Survey 2/10/2014
Conservatiom6ervice National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX D
USFS NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY

v
L 0
N
_ C _
lC � jo
;2 C
v .0 4-a w C , OL iJ7 f id
:E E � �
3 w w w w w 'i = �L 'i o
�� 11111111 I1
mac
N=
ow
ti 4 C r
'r ♦ N 9 .L.r
NL
N � O
H y
T d A
u 3
d T"O y
� N
tya
W
as `
w m U
co
i y
{
a
+y
Y � �

APPENDIX E
DIGITIAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP

V Q
LU
I
CM,� r €4F
4 CL X
All a why
0
IF 7 { o
_ v
w.+�5� 5
W Ld! yp w Ely r a y r
� S ?� n e
rt
� � � 1� CY _ i,.J D ,� � � � ,�µ�ITf +� l� �' h�.A! I I 1'�✓ "�� � �� `vdr J � � «�4��16s1 I � E C � �°.
s
J
olm
I , k J {
�I Y
/ A 0,
{�j rt A
— 6 4
1w h
/ ry
Ci '�

APPENDIX F
REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS

Wetland Delineation Photos Taken: January 14, 2014 and February 5, 2014
Jule Noland Road Property— Haywood County, North Carolina Page 1
Photograph 1: Representative view of the Subject Site facing south to Jule Noland Drive.
Photograph 2: Representative view of gravel road on Subject Site, facing west to Russ Avenue. Note: a 20 -foot sewer
easement and 18 -foot walking trail easement are located on the gravel road.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation - Jule Noland \Appendix F. Representative Photographs - Dellwood.Docx

Wetland Delineation Photos Taken: January 14, 2014 and February 5, 2014
Jule Noland Road Property— Haywood County, North Carolina Page 2
Photograph 3: Representative view of Mauney Cove Branch on the Subject Site.
Photograph 4: View of vegetation at WL -1. Note: the cattails were outside of the vegetation radius plots.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation - Jule Noland \Appendix F. Representative Photographs - Dellwood.Docx

Wetland Delineation Photos Taken: January 14, 2014 and February 5, 2014
Jule Noland Road Property— Haywood County, North Carolina Page 3
Photograph 5: View of hydric soil at WL -1 on the Subject Site.
Photograph 6: View from WL -2 facing upland area to the east.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation - Jule Noland \Appendix F. Representative Photographs - Dellwood.Docx

Wetland Delineation Photos Taken: January 14, 2014 and February 5, 2014
Jule Noland Road Property— Haywood County, North Carolina Page 4
Photograph 7: View of hydric soil at WL -3 on the Subject Site.
Photograph 8: View of non - hydric soil at UPL -1 on the Subject Site.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation - Jule Noland \Appendix F. Representative Photographs - Dellwood.Docx

Wetland Delineation Photos Taken: January 14, 2014 and February 5, 2014
Jule Noland Road Property— Haywood County, North Carolina Page 5
Photograph 9: View of vegetation at UPL -2.
a
r =
r
r
Photograph 10: Representative view of groundwater encountered on the site. Groundwater is approximately 10 inches
to 18 inches below the surface in some locations.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation - Jule Noland \Appendix F. Representative Photographs - Dellwood.Docx

Wetland Delineation Photos Taken: January 14, 2014 and February 5, 2014
Jule Noland Road Property— Haywood County, North Carolina Page 6
Photograph 11: View of drainage connection from the northeastern extent of the wetland. This drainage pattern flows
northeast where it reaches Factory Branch.
Photograph 12: View of stormwater inlets on Jule Noland Drive.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation - Jule Noland \Appendix F. Representative Photographs - Dellwood.Docx

Wetland Delineation Photos Taken: January 14, 2014 and February 5, 2014
Jule Noland Road Property— Haywood County, North Carolina Page 7
Photograph 13: View of stormwater culvert discharging to the Subject Site.
P: \Harmon, John \Wetland Delineation - Jule Noland \Appendix F. Representative Photographs - Dellwood.Docx

APPENDIX G
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjectlSite: i�+ W-O-Ro R r t CitylCounty: kigk$.-ooc�. COUAAJ Sampling Dater -6 -I
Applicant/Owner: KQk1"rvtov\ l2,r"�Ayv% FrOpO —r it$ Lt ,G State: % — Sampling Paint: W L
Investigator(s);1-J.-..(3 vc- %.rk .tL C+ Rc - *% jm► &3 Section, Township, RangetLA%ae/wesVitilr"
Landform (hiltslope, terrace, etc.): S11A M Joe 07 staff. Local relief (concave, convex, none): Jt�y �� Slope ( %): e--5;e,
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L.Rfs N Lac: 35, f,2goo Long; - TA A95 .9 ° Datum: Ab S_S
Sail Map Unit Name: Nkiisloro f (),a% CD tL�) , NWI classification: itJO A/E
Are ctimatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances,, present? Yes_
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No V/
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc,.
Hydrophytic'Vegetation Present? Yes V/ No
H drlc Soil Present? Yes � No Is the Sampled Area
y within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Neo4'1*y )oerV.% C tov.u, C.ree_y- aro ALu v_,OrA4+ wt.-� bar eV%"VtCA ti. e Ae [_v_X 1 YCILru,ogy
k}15"If was �n��`ie� rtv \1o�.i, al A' K��,� p.5�" ra`, -VA�
CQ N b� � Wc���v'MC I ), y P) A..t:, � � � r,`�;w -,� e-i 1 "* SIVkA I
HYDROLOGY
Primary, Indicators (minimum of one is requlred:
check all that amply)
_ Surface Water (Al)
— True Aquatic Plants (1514)
t%High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
^ Water Marks (151)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Salts (C6)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Iron Deposits (155)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (157)
Water- Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Field Observations;
Surface Water Present? Yes
No —%e!f Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
t�
' No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present'? Yes
tr
� No Depth ( inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recordpd Data (stream gauge, moniloring well, aerial photos, previous i
Remarks:
_Q
Ca t`P rrLiA��4V4j-
W" �Voru,6
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required).
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Microtopagraphic Relief (04)
FAC- Neutral Test (DS)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
1. t ,'A� t
US Army Corps of Engineers Lastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2,0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
t Absolute dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plots size 0 % Cover S[
1�N `tA C4 CID 061-
2.
4.
6.
rL
�_ Total Cover
50% of total cover to 20% of total cover: �f
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: iS t )
•
ff
Sampling Point; W L
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 0BL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (13)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: (A/13)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 -
FAC species
x 3 -
FACU species
x 4 -
11PL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
a. V2 2 - Dominance Test is #50°ia
9, 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0°
50% of rota! cover; 20% of total cover; vever — 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: �J
t data In Remarks or an a separate sheet)
j
I/' A- _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. , L116 CAJUS A U 3
2.::Sy ff
T C_
JtL W
3. A r4 tea ea, y h t Qk% n, Wj%
L0
FA C V
4. Caz i dui J?; Y% 0 ► tllP- 4
ko
t �.
5,Sehrr A axy -diaCa
10
71
11.
1 11) 0 • Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover, ;
Woody Vinc Stratum (Plot size: lip 1
I. (O 5(i c d d 1h tn17 yr ?, OA % C a` A IS
3.
4.
55 - Total cover
50% of total cover: L7 20% of total cover:?
or on a separate
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at brcaLil height (013H), regardless of
height,
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. [GBH and greater than or equal to 3.29 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb -- All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Paint:' L___A_
Profile Description. (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Dolor (moist) Color fmoist) % Tyra Lo c' Texture Remarks
Remarks
-I A, 91-S V42 Ia D
11- i(D 190 o le Kl6 C_ rA
'Type: C= Concentration, D- Depletion, RM- Reduced Matrix, MS-Masked Sand Grains. 'Location; PL-Pore Lining. M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils';
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipeddn (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (Se) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin park surface (59) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont F)oodplain Sails (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
ZDepleted Matrix (F3)
(MLkA 136, 147)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depresslons (F8)
_— Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 13 6)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
, Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 146)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed);
Type:
Depth (inches);
Hydric Sail Present? Yes V/ No 0 (- yt, ). ms+ri c+ t oe.
U5 Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and piedmont a Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: E1w v R+J er City /County, Ha vrooA COV AiA sampling Datc:2 -6
ApplicanYOwner: "mr'n&OA 9rt�in.Aw,, Fro�er4;es Stater Sampling Point3iA%+�'
Investigator(s):! Section, Township, Range!IA A�Sd�11�
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc.): SH,0%� 4VQ- OF 5 a Local relief (concave, convex, none): Caws A C- slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA); 1A )V Let: S, $ Lang: - $ Q . `i.Sel 5� Datum: AJA
Sail Map Unit Name:. V4rJ * Gtlwt'L .,,oe x (EyJ5 ) NWI classification: ALINE
Are climatic d hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y Na (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Salt �, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V Na
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No` Is the Sampled Area f
Hydric Sol] Present? Yes '� No within a Welland? Yes —V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes v No
Remarks:
511 ViS;} -.ro "+ 4S c.e+kd�r flu .;, tt a✓� Q prai+� A�e b'sv' rc 4kk e ", ij
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
sec LLdDLry Indl s (minimum of two required)
P01 dlcators minimum of o e uirEd _
h ck all lh t i
— Surface Soil Cracks (138)
Surface Water (Al)
„ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
­�Oxldlzed Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
' Iresence of Reduced Iran (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment deposits (132)
— Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
— Thin Muck surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ other (Explain in Remarks)
stunted or Stressed Plants (01)
~ Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Shallow Aquiterd (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Mierotopographie Rt:lief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC- Neutral Pest (D5)
Field Observations:
No
vl Depth (inches):
Surface Water Present? Yes _
Water Table Presenl7 Yes '� No_
►t
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca pillar, frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks:
i _, �,rn7y Carps of Lnglneers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
1 Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plat size: © ) Cover cies7 status
1.
2. A ) — -
3.- i0 5 5 i
6,
7,
50% of total cover;
SgplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. A r-& ,r rulQrru m
3.
4,
7.
8�
Total Cover
20% or total cover.
1-5
Aj4T stAk4- AL6,w :5 �/. w�&rz vwl - Total Cover
50% of total cover; 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
I. 3D
2. U)N Guy -t r_ 'A U i S ac) mss -
3. :S U try -C4 'fir''v.S 1) S © � W
6. p_ s>'�10�1 vt++ r�si tat' rn 5 F�iC
9.
to.
1t.
00 a Total Cover
50% of total cover: 24% of total cover: aD
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size; )
7.
2.
5.
. Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover;
r5 here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: 'W L
Dominance Test worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Number of Dominant Species
OBL species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
— _ - (A)
Total Number of dominant
FAC species
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
UPL species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A!B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply thy:
OBL species
x 1 -
FACW species
x 2 -
FAC species
x 3 =
FACT) species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = RIA -
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 Dominance Test is >60%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present. unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
5aplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.26 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W L 9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) - Calor (moist) a SYl?, �Loc� Texture Remarks
Jo YR 3-81? 5 K y/ Is >LQAV
MS= Mask4d Sand Grains.
Hydric Soli Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck WQ) (MLRA 147)
Histle Epipcdon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (Se) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(ML.RA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al U) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (1`6)
i Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted Darr Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
+i/°Iron•Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA. 136)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
"Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
— Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches);
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V" No
6 afiti
i
Stopit a stS Ao 'L-,-- S�Ak dedclo c-"f`"Al- 16kLC3
a.V-J' cam k i \ CIA C-0 "tea .
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Praject1Slte: eilwya CLrQ CitylCounty; Ka '1 00A COO Kk sampling Cate:v2 -15
Applicant/Owner: Ykmr rw ,n r w% r e, ri► a Slater sampling Polni: '
Investigator(s):1Y• '3e1VL.&krk dI.CL _LS" Section, Township, Range:% n,dsVili�
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):. f IZI ' Local relief (concave, convex, none): AJO Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): , L-g ,L1i Lai: OS. Sol 7 A Long: . g158a _ Datum:
Soil Map unit Name: W o¢A _ C'�4�n ��V\d c�hyw C k NWI classificatlow A�
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions an the site typical for this time of year? Yes No , __ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil _ , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Na
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area `
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wotland? Yes *' No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes v No
Remarks:
arb,t - s e w► ri^ be— e—KVV KL „Jcjl" )r yJ kQ6y .
i a16►i s cerr VC + - — Glko —% OL10- a grvtc„ 0.53t` fzW lt: •t+ , r-s cee >o 1
,n. juoc-Ak
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators 1m117mum of t44quired
Pri9ary Indicators nlmurn otone is required' check all that I _ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) „ True Aquatic Plants (1314) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
ligh Water Table (A2) — Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (81 a)
Saturation (A3) -_, oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Mass Trim Lines (616)
Writer Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iran (C4) _ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) — Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) — Crayfish Burrows (Ca) .
Drift Deposits (B3) — Thin Muck Surface (C7) — Saturation Visible an Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) — Other (Explain in Remarks) _, Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
iron Deposits (85) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) J Shallow Aqultard (03)
Water- Stained Leaves (139) ^ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813) FAC•Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations: It
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth th Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes_ No • Depth (inches) :�gill —
Saturation Present? Yes _ _ No Depth (inches); Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Includes ca Mary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -- Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Fiat size: )
Z.
2.
3.
4. ON
5.
f�.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicato
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
5fl9r'o�of total cover: 20% of total cover
5aolinalStarub stratum (Plot size:
7..t►� °5 spry•
2, ABC N)Pe'iy^
3, g cti5 ,
4.
5.
7.
9.
Total %Q_ over of:
Multipl� by;
OBL species
x t -
FACW species
x 2 -
=Total Cover
rO
x3=
50% of total cover: LS
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
x 5
Column Totals:
(A) (t1j
2. -<,` St` J?J a7
1 tO %re-A5
a
05L
3.: (_Ct �S
4 N10 C CL
7G
S. Ve. CSiCdf -V
SaA1A' OM
5
01& L
6.
7,
B.
J.
11.
/ = Total Cover
509`0 of total cover: '7 5 20% of total cover: 1
W-Qgdy Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 t )
1.
2. I CaN G 6
3.
A.
a,
Remarks:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
rs here or on a separate sheet)
Sampling Point:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are O13L, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species r�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t (A113)
Prevalence Index worksheet;
Total %Q_ over of:
Multipl� by;
OBL species
x t -
FACW species
x 2 -
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5
Column Totals:
(A) (t1j
Prevalence Index - BlA -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators,
_ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 • Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It (1
m) tail.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless5
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft iii
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
U5 Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Faint: wL W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document tho indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth _ Matrix Redox Features
finches) Color moist — __Q /, _Rq _Type_ Loc TOXturt � Remarks
ADJ 70 \06M 150f
Hydric Soil Indicators:
H €stosol (Al)
-_, Histic Eplpedon (A2)
— Black Hlstic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
-_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Ail)
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (I-RR N,
MLRA 147,14B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Qark Surface (S7)
-`- Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Bark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
ZIron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red. Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for problematic Hydric Soils':
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland 'hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
- Hydric soil Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VVETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Lastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: De\ \wooA ROEA. City /County: hkA v✓ooA Sampling Date :v2 -6-1
ApplicantlQwner: l'iarr,wcA C7rrA w% FraFe rii esi LL Stater Sampling Point:
Investlgator(s): _ e Section, Township, Range`. K *
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.); _)(N& Locaf relief (Concave, convex, none); Napa
Subregion (LRR or MLRA).., Ai Lat; a Long: t S Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ' P C Ga E NWI ciassificatfon:
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for lhls time of year? Yes No (If 17o, explain in Remarks.)
Ara Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil =, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? (If needed; explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes, No
Hydric Sall Present? Yes No
4—
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the sampled Area f
within a Wetland? Yes No V
5► a v� ', wd-S C,6Adi.,. CA �u1�o�;.� ��,, a�Qra��� -r,�t� o.-6V' r�t�.�w�� a ve.,ii,
GtS i r' by µ+e- 1/Ja nEsv�l�c ( AyN) /Vary Co�cvl',►t 1:vua,xt SFu4'ion
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that
_
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
J High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Saturation (A3)
_, oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Sediment Deposits (62)
^ Recent Iran Reductlon in Tilled Soils (C6)
Drift Deposits (B3)
— Thin Muck Surface (C7) -
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
— tither (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (85)
`
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Water- Stalned Leaves (1219)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
fieia unseruarlons: '1/
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No Depth (Inches)':
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes — No Depth (Inches):
Rema
gauge,
— Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (118)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (616)
Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
— Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
shallow Aquitard (D3) •
Mlcrotopographic Relier (04)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No I'
if
a "t 4,c
_,Cc o cs 0+ i C_ _Slag voc re ObS k_ k,
US Army Carps of E_n(jincers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -- Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
t Absolute Dominant Indicatoi
Tree Stratum (Plot size: _ lb 0 ) Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
4, d {2{
7
501Y6 of total cover
5aplingfShrub Stratum) (Plot size. -
i,
2.
3,
5.�,0
s.
7.
Total Cover
20% of total cover:
® Total Cover
F
50Q/,D of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb stratum (Plot size; )
1. a r D e_ &V. Ci e rk % 's ` Fee l
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10.
11.
v Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: i I?
W- oodyVlne Stratum (Plot size: SO4 )
1.
2.
3.
4. n 3S C'V
= Total Cover
50% of total cover; 20`31; of total cover;
rs here or on a separate sheet.)
�b1 ; Lf G&r ok %:: s 'lie-&F ov,%6 w w r-
Anee, l" 0.(hL ti, tfv4� $ rtes ,
Sampling Paint: 0 TL —A-.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FAGW, or FAG; (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OSL, FACW, or FAC: (A18)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total Cover or:
Multioly by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 -
FAC species
x 3 -
FACU species qo —
x4= .36 0
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals.
(A) 360 (B)
Prevalence Index - BIA = Y
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 • Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is X3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophydc Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplingfShrub - Woody plants. excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present's Yes No
', S "Jem _S �\a d es .
US Army Corps of Engineers Lastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: �-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Pepth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Lac Texture ReMgrks
0-1b log 316 JkQ lh OaLw+
RMFReduc
Hydric Soil Indicators;
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
_ Histosol (Al)
— Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Eplpedon (A2)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MLRA 147, 148)
_, Coast Prairie Redox (A15)
_ Slack Histic (A3)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 146)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
" Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
- Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
— Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 135, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A16) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
— Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted Dark Surface (177)
^ other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
_
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
— Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA.136)
_ Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (55)
— Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
- I Hydric Soil Present? Yes No L-�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2,0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and piedmont Region
Project/site: Dg%\Wj,;Ck Rork OtylCounty; IAQ vraa0k CEO r-4 sampling bate:o2 -6 -If
Applicantli]wnt r: "af r1A A r M f-di State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):19- i3auc.V,L C dL n IL C. Section, Township,
, Ran L I ^ e VIt
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc.): k-Cfir a Lcccal relief (concave, convex, none): 0AJ Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): olk Lat: ?� 5 a 1� ° Long; ' •q86 3Z _ Datum: Ab 193
Soil Map Unit Name: f NWI classification: t/oA/E
Are climatic % hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes u No_ (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Sail , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes A/-- No
Are Vegetation , soil , cr Hydrology naturally problematic7 (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important futures, etc.
Hydrophytic VegelaWri Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Presen17 Yes No
Remarks: \ y`
-T LiL c lt� jo 'I,�tQN , i}h oy" "�',-c �v" bt kwav,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators;
Prlmary Indicators (minitnum of one Is required; cl P k all that i1 )I
Surface Water (Al)
^ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_
Wlgh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iran (C4)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Decent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7) ..
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
i other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (85)
_ inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Water- Stalned Leaves (89)
Aquatic Fauna (8 13)
Field observations: /
Surface Water Present? Yes No V Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): i
Saturation Present7 Yes '✓ No_ Depth (inches): 31%
(includes capillary fringe)
gauge,
Remarks:
lie- o ,t vas
1++Air- oc -f-v( S- c,n
previous
/I`i - aL /slI{. fka,w
Surface Soli Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
Drainage Patterns (816)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Saturation visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D )
MicrotopograpNc Relief (134)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No-
(A0, CC? rdYtv-41611 � (J• r�7 ��
rA,-Fa.Vk 4 ;e- A ,
-\-* S Yi e Cu r oji;A .
us luny r:� p,c of i n.gincers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: J PL. -
1 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plat size: ) %Cover_ S e e s Number of Dominant Species J
1. That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: 1 (A)
2.
Tate! Number of Dominant 3. - Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
5, That Are 08L, FACW, or FACT: (AIB)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total 4_Cnver ef: Multiply 0.v!
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 - —
SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size:. i t 1
FACW species x 2
1.
S
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 -
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index - BA -
4
5,
6.,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
Rapid Pest For Fiydrophytic Vegetation
—12
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
®_
- -
9.
3 - Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
= Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptatlons' (Provide supporting
f 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:. )
data in Remarks or an a separate sheet)
1, Oyi6c
le.tL +Ka �T
Problematic Hyd►ophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.Stj
,g ,ns,�
I kaeao La34at1eYLj to FACt
* �
3.- e—
mo;'k0 eAV%44 0
Indicators of hydric sail and wetland hydrology must
A%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic,
h,
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
—� -
5,
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
SaplinglShroh - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3,28 ft (1
10.
m) tall
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
10D - Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: _ 20% of total cover:. C
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size:
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.20 ft In
height,
1.
2.
UP
3.
4.
Hydraphytic
5.
Vegetation
= Total Cover
Present? Ycs Na
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
U5 Army Carps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: () PL
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color {moist
Hydric soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Betuw Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (FB)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Flpodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Alo � (-, s a'►1 � �` V� j i r ~-b ra p
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Fxplain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

ATTACHMENT 2
North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method Forms

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
mating t,aicuiator version 4. 1
Wetland Site Name Jule Nolan Property Date 12/09/14
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name /Organization ECS- Brandon Fulton, LSS, PWS
Level III Ecoregion Blue Ridge Mountains - Nearest Named Water Body Mauney Cove Branch
River Basin French Broad USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 06010106
F;

4. Soil Texture /Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. A Sandy soil
E ; B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
B Soil ribbon ? 1 inch
4c. ;A No peat or muck presence
r; B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub - surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub - surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
A A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
C C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
r- A T A F A >- 10% impervious surfaces
7 D 7 B 17 B < 10% impervious surfaces
f r- C r C Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
7 a r- D r- D >_ 20% coverage of pasture
r E r- E r E >- 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
F F r F r F >- 20% coverage of maintained grass /herb
F G r G r G ? 20% coverage of clear -cut land
F H F H r H Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area /wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
F"Yes r" No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of the wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
A ? 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
' E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels /braids for a total width.
<_ 15 -feet wide [; > 15 -feet wide [; Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
Yes � No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
' Exposed - adjacent open water with width >- 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type /wetland complex metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box
in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the
wetland complex at the assessment areas (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
A
A
? 100 feet
B"
B
From 80 to < 100 feet
C;
C
From 50 to < 80 feet
D
D
From 40 to < 50 feet
E
E
From 30 to < 40 feet
F
F
From 15 to < 30 feet
G;
G
From 5 to < 15 feet
H
H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short- duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long- duration inundation or very long- duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type /wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear -cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
CA CA CA >: 500 acres
C B C B C B From 100 to < 500 acres
CC C C C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D D From 25 to < 50 acres
E E E From 10 to < 25 acres
F F F From 5 to < 10 acres
G G G From 1 to < 5 acres
H H H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
I I I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
CJ CJ CJ From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
C K C K C K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear -cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
CA Pocosin is the full extent (? 90 %) of its natural landscape size.
C B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and /or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
A CA ? 500 acres
C B C B From 100 to < 500 acres
CC C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D From 10 to < 50 acres
E E < 10 acres
F F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
CYes C No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters /stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non - forested areas ? 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts.
Consider the eight main points of the compass.
CA No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
C B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
E;C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear -cut
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
CA Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
CC Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
CA Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species ( <10% cover of exotics).
C B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
CC Vegetation is dominated by exotic species ( >50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area /wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
E Yes C No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
[:A
>_ 25%
coverage of vegetation
C B
< 25%
coverage of vegetation
17c. Check
a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace
above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA
WT
[:A
[:A
Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
o
@
B
[] B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U
E; C
E; C
Canopy sparse or absent
� 0
[:A
A
Dense mid - story/sapling layer
B
B
Moderate density mid - story/sapling layer
°—
E:C
E:C
Mid - story/sapling layer sparse or absent
[:A
[:A
Dense shrub layer
J
B
B
Moderate density shrub layer
c')
C
C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
[:A
[:A
Dense herb layer
m
E; B
B
Moderate density herb layer
_
[:C
C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12- inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
[:A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 -inch DBH.
E;C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man - placed natural debris.
[:A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
E;B Not
21. Vegetation /Open Water Dispersion — wetland type /open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
[:A B []C D
r7,. r rT
y
82"' �keYlh
1 i V
YJ
22. Hydrologic Connectivity— assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive
ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man -made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
[:A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
[:C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
C D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Initial wetland appears to have been a Bottomland Hardwood Forest wetland. A berm and prior clearing activities have altered the connection
between the adjacent stream and the wetland. The wetland is now dominated by herbaceous species. Subsequently, saturation and slight
evidence of inundation were noted, with surface flow navigating to a drainage feature which flows to the an adjacent creek. For the aforementioned
reason, the site does not stay inundated for a duration to support it meeting the definition of a Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Jule Nolan Property Date 12/09/14
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name /Organization 3- Brandon Fulton, LSS, P
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y /N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y /N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y /N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y /N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y /N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y /N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y /N) NO
Sub - function Rating Summary
Function Sub - function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub - Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition /Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Condition /Opportunity
MEDIUM
Hydrology
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition /Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition /Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition /Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition /Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics /Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition /Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N)
NO
Habitat
Conditon
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

DocuSign Envelope ID: 83F79B80- CEC2- 475B- A4C5- 97447E904C71
Wanda H. Austin, PE
Engineering Services
828 508 -2639 45 Homespun Road
828 342 -5079 Sylva, North Carolina 28779
December 11, 2014
Purpose and Need of US 19 Connection:
As requested, a driveway connection has been designed for the property from US 19 as
well as Jule Noland Drive. The new connection will be facilitated by installing a 22' arch
culvert over Factory Branch. There are no proposed impact to the stream; therefore, the
total impacts to the project do not increase due to the proposed connection. Further
analysis of the internal traffic flow warrant the additional access to the property. To
reduce the impacts to the wetland; the road typical has been modified to include a smaller
footprint; 18' pavement. Additionally a 5' gabion basket wall along the fill side and curb
& gutter will be utilized to further reduce the road footprint. The modified typical
reduces the impacts 0.2 acres. The new proposed impacts to wetland is 1.0 acres with a
remaining 2.2 acres. This internal access will divide the traffic demand between the two
access points on US 19 and Jule Noland Drive. The safety of the general public will be
maintained by providing a separate access to the grocery store for trucks and deliveries.
The internal access also reduces the number of conflicting movements for the driver.
Patrons accessing the property from US 19 west will be able to turn right into the
property through the northern entrance off US 19 then turn right out of the property
through the southern entrance onto Jule Noland Drive. All other patrons can access the
road with only one left turn movement. Therefore, the internal access road increases the
safety of the motoring public by reducing the potential of conflicting movements at the
intersections adjoining the property.
Alternative Analysis:
The revised analysis of other available property of approximate 5.0 acres within a five
mile radius of the property has been completed. As stated in the application, the property
is zoned commercial within the city limits of Waynesville and is located near the
intersection of two major highways, US 19 and US 276. This area not only is the single
access to Waynesville from Maggie Valley and Jonathan Creek communities but also
serves Junaluska Assembly and Lake Junaluska. Kim Teague of Prudential 1 st Choice
Realtors has provided two properties fitting this description. A 6.1 acre tract on Moody
Farm Road and a 5.0 acre tract on Howell Mill Road. The tracts are open land located off
any major highway. The access to the properties is limited. The property also increases
the trip length for the area of service targeted by the grocery retail. The potential
customer base of Lake Junaluska and Junaluska Assembly would be lost at these location.
Therefore, the current location remains the best alternative for a new grocery retail.
Mitigation:
A NC WAM has been completed by ECS Carolinas and included with this response. The
overall rating of the wetland is LOW. Additionally, the remaining 2.2 acres will be
PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Creator X - Trial :: http: / /www.docudesk.com

DocuSign Envelope ID: 83F79B80- CEC2- 4758- A4C5- 97447E904C71
Harmon Graham—Jule Noland Road
placed into a conservation easement with Southern Water Conservation. At the time of
this response, Mr. Harmon is still in negotiations with Southern Water Conservation.
The survey of the proposed conservation easement has been provided as an attachment.
Thank you for the opportunity to address the concerns. Please let me know if you
need any additional information to continue to process the application.
Sirac . rely,Y:
In 4. a-u, k{ k-
4F180 62 8 04 D...
Wan a ustin, PE CPM
2
PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Creator X - Trial :: http: / /www.docudesk.com

IPS
IPF
NIP
EIP
CMS
CMF
PP
SP
PT
R/W
X X X -
7T7
TOR
OHP
MNS
POL
LEGEND
IRON PIN SET
IRON PIN FOUND
NEW IRON PIPE
EXISTING IRON PIPE
CONCRETE MONUMENT SET
CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
POWER POLE
SERVICE POLE
POINT
RIGHT -OF -WAY
FENCE
CREEK OR SMALL BRANCH
TOP OF RIDGE
TOP OF RIDGE
OVERHEAD POWER LINE
MAG NAIL SET
POINT ON LINE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF HAYWOOD
I, ________________________ _______ , REVIEW OFFICER OF HAYWOOD COUNTY, CERTIFY THAT
THE PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS AFFIXED MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING
REVIEW OFFICER
DATE:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF HAYWOOD
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PRESENTED FOR REGISTRATION AND RECORDED IN THIS OFFICE
IN PLOT CABINET ----------- SLIDE ------------ THIS ________ DAY OF
AT -------- O'CLOCK __ M, 20____ AD.
REGISTER OF DEEDS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS OF THE FOLLOWING TYPE:
G.S. 47 -30 (f)(11)(a). THIS SURVEY CREATES A SUBDIVISION OF LAND
WITHIN THE AREA OF A COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY THAT HAS AN
ORDINANCE THAT REGULATES PARCELS OF LAND.
a�
SAL
Ley
w
S 84-33'38" E
N 44'46'44" E 184.86' S 59 °19'07" E T,
82.35'_\ � - � - � F� 40.36' V
N 73 °51'10" E S \
40.92' � 2
i �
D. F3.. SEWE
483, p SEMENT S�SS�
/ 2655 \'�°�'
5 8 "IPS
\
L14 L15 L16 A
13.71' IFGo
518 "IPS Goy
F, N S 11 W
�D ORNE N 79 °59 1 "� !1 49.08'
�O'C � UNLESS �T SET co /PROPOSED 213.68' w Fio
� (EDGE OF W ERW/SE N Q) �' GABION BASKET WALL
N.C. GRID NORTH
FROM PC "C ", SL 4325
x
�,E
Trp/CAL ETLA BD _TED N /
JAMES R. DAVENPORT, P.L.S. L -1462 / TRACT co
N
/ „ ,� 518 „IPS /NN
TRACT B
ARMON GRAHAM PROPERTIES LLC /Co
�/- PROPOSED CONSERVATION
EASEMENT (WETLANDS)
i' 2.193 Acres o
/ PART OF DB 783, PG 2208 m >" EIP (TALL) o
C�
223.52' 114.82' 6 120.67' 518 "IPS 7d, 19 .4)
US 26// / s� -, L2 (S 89 °52'59" W) �
I S S �2 42'N\ \ \6D ��� S 60 °03'29" E
TRACT „A„ 3092319, e� \�oBR 29. F �4�c 13.58' UND
I (PARENT TRACT) AF FO
I PROPOSED BUILDING HARMON GRAHAM PROPERTIES LLC EP , /2 "REB S 7.30' 17" E
127.30'
N 06 °50'41" E ( NOT RE- SURVEYED AT THIS TIME) \ \
166.73' `I PLOTTED FROM ENSLEY SURVEY \
I RECORDED IN PLAT CAB. C, SLOT 4325 EIP S 68 °00'47" E
7.639 Acres \ 149.49'
I SERVICE /TRUCK PART OF DB 783, PG 2208 \
I N 83.09'CHITRVCE \ \
15.00'
IPF
394.28' - - -- - - - clk� -
S 89° 15'17" W 4.53' IV
hN 06'50'59" E S 75 °58'48" W N 82 °30'01 „ IN \ N
80.00' / c�F 50.01 ' �- \ \ ^M /�
a �S 67°53'22" W \ (-V/
50.06'
-O
~N
2S i
I S 83'09'01 " E / 602po \ \ /
W 15.00' 2 \ t��
N 06 °50'55.00 - I / S 50 °08'51 " W \
'� 173.48'
I ' � \ � c� S 26'50'23" W
12.8 1 '
9'" '� S 26 °50'23" W
0 27.63'
S 58 °29'21 " W
/A 97.57'
N 68 °34'10" W �
34.98'
I, JAMES R. DAVENPORT, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER DAVENPORT
MY SUPERVISION. DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK _783 _ PAGE _2_2_0_8 _ THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT NOTES: 1) ACREAGE CALCULATED BY COORDINATE COMPUTATIONS.
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN BOOK _________ , PAGE _ , THAT PROFESSIONAL I
2) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RIGHT OF WAYS, EASEMENTS AND
THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS 1: 10,000 + • THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GS 47 -30 AS P.O. BOX 234
AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NO., AND SEAL THIS _ 11th _ DAY OF __DECEMBER __ , AD 2014 RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD, UNRECORDED, WRITTEN AND /OR UNWRITTEN.
I PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR - REGISTRATION NUMBER L -1462
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, _____________________________ , REVIEW OFFICER OF ______________ COUNTY, CERTIFY THAT THE MAP OR
PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS AFFIXED MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING.
REVIEW OFFICER DATE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA: COUNTY OF ________________________ .
THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATES OF JAMES R. DAVENPORT, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, AND __________________________
REVIEW OFFICER, ARE CERTIFIED TO BE CORRECT. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PRESENTED FOR REGISTRATION AND RECORDED IN THIS
OFFICE IN PLAT CABINET -------- SLIDE --------- THIS ______ DAY OF ---------- AT ______ O'CLOCK ___M, 20 ------ AD.
REGISTER OF DEEDS
3) DASHED LINES (TRACT "B ") NOT RE- SURVEYED AT THIS TIME - PLOTTED
FROM ENSLEY SURVEY RECORDED IN PLAT CAB. C, SLOT 4325
4) FOR GRID TIE SEE PLAT CAB. "C ", SLOT 4325
C'�Ro
,.•OQ- .oFESSio �� - --
SEAL -
L -1462
;Qp,; 0 80 160 240
unnr��.
BOUNDARY -
TRACT
"C"
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S
22 °03'48"
W
278.03'
L2
S
89 °52'59"
W
459.00'
L3
N
47 °11'27"
E
16.41'
L4
N
54 °25' 14"
E
48.67'
L5
N
42 °09'35"
E
51.98'
L6
N
60 °43'03"
E
60.25'
L7
N
51 °51'03"
E
38.32'
L8
N
52 °47'57"
E
48.48'
L9
N
47'15'46"
E
51 .10'
L10
N
46 °21'33"
E
45.08'
L11
N
49 °16'44"
E
43.71'
L12
N
54 °21'13"
E
49.82'
L13
N
54 °46'18"
E
24.51'
L14
S
81 °54'06"
E
47.75'
L15
S
71 ° 19'04"
E
51.86'
L16
S
88 °35'52"
E
86.26'
L17
S
33 °36'01 "
E
16.6 5'
~N
2S i
I S 83'09'01 " E / 602po \ \ /
W 15.00' 2 \ t��
N 06 °50'55.00 - I / S 50 °08'51 " W \
'� 173.48'
I ' � \ � c� S 26'50'23" W
12.8 1 '
9'" '� S 26 °50'23" W
0 27.63'
S 58 °29'21 " W
/A 97.57'
N 68 °34'10" W �
34.98'
I, JAMES R. DAVENPORT, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER DAVENPORT
MY SUPERVISION. DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK _783 _ PAGE _2_2_0_8 _ THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT NOTES: 1) ACREAGE CALCULATED BY COORDINATE COMPUTATIONS.
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN BOOK _________ , PAGE _ , THAT PROFESSIONAL I
2) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RIGHT OF WAYS, EASEMENTS AND
THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS 1: 10,000 + • THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GS 47 -30 AS P.O. BOX 234
AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NO., AND SEAL THIS _ 11th _ DAY OF __DECEMBER __ , AD 2014 RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD, UNRECORDED, WRITTEN AND /OR UNWRITTEN.
I PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR - REGISTRATION NUMBER L -1462
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, _____________________________ , REVIEW OFFICER OF ______________ COUNTY, CERTIFY THAT THE MAP OR
PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS AFFIXED MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING.
REVIEW OFFICER DATE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA: COUNTY OF ________________________ .
THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATES OF JAMES R. DAVENPORT, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, AND __________________________
REVIEW OFFICER, ARE CERTIFIED TO BE CORRECT. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PRESENTED FOR REGISTRATION AND RECORDED IN THIS
OFFICE IN PLAT CABINET -------- SLIDE --------- THIS ______ DAY OF ---------- AT ______ O'CLOCK ___M, 20 ------ AD.
REGISTER OF DEEDS
3) DASHED LINES (TRACT "B ") NOT RE- SURVEYED AT THIS TIME - PLOTTED
FROM ENSLEY SURVEY RECORDED IN PLAT CAB. C, SLOT 4325
4) FOR GRID TIE SEE PLAT CAB. "C ", SLOT 4325
C'�Ro
,.•OQ- .oFESSio �� - --
SEAL -
L -1462
;Qp,; 0 80 160 240
unnr��.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0673C94A- D7E7- 4COC- BD54- 1080367F7017
NOTES:
1. ALUMINUM PURE ARCH 22'X5'11" ,175 THICK, TYPE 4
RIBS @ 27"
2. MINIMUM COVER = 3'; MAXIMUM COVER = 16'
3. ASSUME LIVE LOAD = HL -93
X 5'11" STRUCTURAL
IaW:IIW_l:,4soWK1I1ILVIa:141
2570
2565
2560
2.0 J
CROSS SECTION
PLAN VIEW
R ❑POSED GROUND ELEVATION
TOP OF F❑❑TING
L. 256,5---------- --
////
XISTING GROUND ELEVATION
z
TA
/,—TOP OF F❑❑TING
8" EL 2565
6" #4B4
#4B2
#4B3 84"
1
J 5- #4B4 @6' MAX I;
2'8"
#4B4 @ 12" MAX
EACH FACE
4j'
F
#4B1
DETAIL OF CONCRETE FOOTING
6" MIN FOR CRYSTALLINE ROCK OR
12" MIN FOR WEATHERED ROCK
DETAIL OF CONCRETE BACKEILL
SHEET 1
BILL OF REINFORCING
BAR TYPES
BAR
N❑,
SIZE
TYPE
LENGTH
WEIGHT
B1
432
4
1
4' -10"
1395
B2
432
4
2
3' -4 1/4"
968
)KB3
432
4
STR
10' -0"
2886
B4
40
4
STR
53' -4"
1426
W
�z
TOTAL REINFORCING STEEL 6,675 LBS,
CL
FOOTINGS CU YDS, 57.8
TOTAL
CU YDS, 57.8
Q
U
J o
Q —�
ii6 Q
wBARS TO BE FIELD CUT TO MEET ADEQUATE CLEARANCE
g) Qz
o W Q �-
I z
rl� H
`D Q Lei
oz��,DQ-j
�OW03 >-
-5 "�
Ld
NOTES:1'
COUNTY: HAYW❑ ❑D
OWNSHIP:
AYNESVILLE
WATERSHED:
1. CONCRETE QUANTITY IS
CALCULATED USING
THE MINIMUM
DEPTH SHOWN,
ACTUAL DEPTH MAY VARY
TO ACHIEVE THE
REQUIRED MINIMUM EMBEDMENT
INTO ROCK AS SHOWN„
ALL BAR DIMENSI ❑NS ARE
2. ADDITIONAL #4B4 BARS
MAY BE REQUIRED
WHERE F❑❑TING
DEPTH INCREASES
OUT TO OUT,
MAXIMUM SPACING BETWEEN BARS ON EACH
FACE SHALL
BE AS SHOWN
IN THE
F❑❑TING SECTI ❑N,
z
TA
/,—TOP OF F❑❑TING
8" EL 2565
6" #4B4
#4B2
#4B3 84"
1
J 5- #4B4 @6' MAX I;
2'8"
#4B4 @ 12" MAX
EACH FACE
4j'
F
#4B1
DETAIL OF CONCRETE FOOTING
6" MIN FOR CRYSTALLINE ROCK OR
12" MIN FOR WEATHERED ROCK
DETAIL OF CONCRETE BACKEILL
SHEET 1
C
Z:
SEAL
= ocusigned0 25536 -
US
�
A�
�G -•.^,Fn E°
—44
12/ 044.
L1J
�
I
z� o
H U q LO
~ ¢
/
\
/ O 00
} Q 00 cu
Pq LdzW00
L D a- Z
a Z � to
CL r- Ld
o =
= > o
LW
Z Ln
Ln I
L.D
�L Z�� 't
F—I L d (y)
z 00
Q N
v
W
�z
U �
CL
U
Q
U
J o
Q —�
I o co
g) Qz
o W Q �-
I z
rl� H
`D Q Lei
oz��,DQ-j
�OW03 >-
C #Ln-i
Ld
H
COUNTY: HAYW❑ ❑D
OWNSHIP:
AYNESVILLE
WATERSHED:
FRENCH BROAD
SCALE:
NTS'

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0673C94A- D7E7- 4COC- BD54- 1080367F7017
irrr
PDE-
00, —
41
/e
/ Al WAT
/ I #1
■ I
=-PnF —
I I 7
�i IN
IS M NT
I Y \ \S FORM W�-,
1
STORM WATER BASIN #1
r
�.r
3 ROPOSED
15' CULVERT
INV IN 2577'
o INV OUT 2576.5'
DRAINAGE AREA #1
0,93 ACRES
C =0.95
STORM WATER
EMERGENCY OUTLET 3'X3'
TOP EL 2580'
BOTTOM EL 2576'
E ,— CURB —C/�_U_T
PROPOSED
15' CULVERT
INV IN 2576.5'
V QTORM WATER
MERGENCY OUTLET 3'X3'
OP EL 2580'
nTTnM Fl P57F,'
STORM WATER
�MRM WATER URB C
STORM WATER BASIN #3
10' F
SE
TER
STORM WATER BASIN #5
GENERAL NOTES,
USE CLASS 'B' CONCRETE THROUGHOUT
PROVIDE ALL CATCH BASINS OVER 3' -6' IN
DEPTH WITH STEPS 12' ON CENTER
FOR 8'-0' IN HEIGHT OR LESS USE 6' WALLS
AND BOTTOM SLAB. OVER 8'-0' TO 16' -0' IN
HEIGHT USE 8' WALLS AND BOTTOM SLAB,
ADJUST QUANTITIES ACCORDINGLY.
15' OUTLET CULVERT
El
c, 2,0 0.5
a
° v a
e a a•
o °
a
a v
o •
e
V a
e °
0
o °
• a
v s
o °
v > a
•e o
� 3.0 �
OUTLET DETAIL
I — —
PROPOSED _
15' CULVERT I
INV IN 2577'
INV OUT 2576.5 j
DRAINAGE AREA #2 II
1,20 ACRES STORM WATER
TN JP
C =0.95 STORM WATER --
EMERGENCY OUTLET 3'X3' _— STORM
�❑�EC2580' r _
BOTTOM EL 2576'
STORM WATER BASIN #2
STORM WATER BASIN #4
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
DITCH
3 ❑SED
i CULVERT
✓ IN 2580.5'
✓ OUT 2580'
TORM WATER
MERGENCY OUTLET 3
OP EL 2582'
OTTOM EL 2578'
1. Obtain Erosion Control Permit and other applicable permits prior to the start of grading.
2. Install rain gauge in an accessible area. Dedicate a log book to record rain events and weekly inspections.
3. Maintain the temporary gravel construction entrance from phase 1.
4. Stake area around remaining wetland for perimeter protection fence.
3. Manually install a perimeter protection fence around the delineated wetland. No equipment is allowed
within the wetland boundary that is not to be disturbed.
4. Install silt fence at all locations shown on plan sheet. Silt fence shall be manually installed along the
outside of the 10 foot wetland buffer.
5. Layout the areas for the construction of the temporary skimmer basins.
6. Construct the temporary skimmer basins to the appropriate dimensions. Construct the baffles in the
temporary skimmer basins.
7. Establish temporary cover according to stabilization table schedule and the seeding schedule on ECP 2.
8. Seed, fertilize and mulch all exposed areas using the seeding schedule included on ECP2, adjusting to the
schedule for the season. All disturbed areas should be treated with ground cover within 7 to 14 calendar
days of completion of grading activities according to the stabilization table on ECP 2.
9. Once grading is complete, install temporary silt fence around permanent drainage easement.
10. Construct storm water basins and outlet structures.
11. Seed and fertilize areas.
12. Once vegetation has been established, remove all temporary erosion control devices.
3
420
CURB CUT DETAIL
i
Stabilization Reauirements:
Stabilization for this project shall comply with the time frame guidelines as specified by the NCG- 010000 general construction
permit effective August 3, 2011 issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water
Quality. Temporary or permanent ground cover stabilization shall occur within 7 calendar days from the last land - disturbing
activity, with the following exceptions in which temporary or permanent ground cover shall be provided in 14 calendar days from
the last land - disturbing activity:
• Slopes between 2:1 and 3:1, with a slope length of 10 ft. or less
• Slopes 3:1 or flatter, with a slope of length of 50 ft. or less
• Slopes 4:1 or flatter
SEEDING AND MULCHING:
The kinds of seed and fertilizer, and the rates of application of seed, fertilizer, and limestone, shall be as stated below. During
periods of overlapping dates, the kind of seed to be used shall be determined. All rates are in pounds per acre.
August 1- June 1 May 1 - September 1
100# Tall Fescue 100# Tall Fescue
15# Kentucky Bluegrass 15# Kentucky Bluegrass
30# Hard Fescue 30# Hard Fescue
25# Rye Grain 10# German or Browntop Millet
500# Fertilizer 500# Fertilizer
4000# Limestone 4000# Limestone
Approved Tall Fescue Cultivars
2nd Millennium; Duster; Magellan; Rendition; Avenger; Endeavor; Masterpiece; Scorpion; Barlexas; Escalade; Matador; Shelby;
Barlexas II; Falcon II, III, IV & V; Matador GT; Signia Barrera; Fidelity; Millennium; Silverstar; Barrington; Finesse II; Montauk;
Southern Choice II; Biltmore; Firebird; Mustang 3; Stetson; Bingo; Focus; Olympic Gold; Tarheel; Bravo; Grande I1; Padre; Titan
Ltd; Cayenne; Greenkeeper; Paraiso; Titanium; Chapel Hill; Greystone; Picasso; Tomahawk; Chesapeake; Inferno; Piedmont; Tacer;
Constitution; Justice; Pure Gold; Trooper; Chipper; Jaguar 3; Prospect; Turbo Coronado; Kalahari; Quest; Ultimate; Coyote;
Kentucky 31; Rebel Exeda; Watchdog; Davinci; Kitty Hawk; Rebel Sentry; Wolfpack; Dynasty; Kitty Hawk 2000; Regiment II;
Dominion; Lexington; Rembrandt
Approved Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars:
Alpine; Bariris; Envicta; Rugby; Apollo; Bedazzled; Impact; Rugby II; Arcadia; Bordeaux; Kenblue; Showcase; Arrow;
Champagne; Midnight; Sonoma; Award; Chicago II; Midnight II
Approved Hard Fescue Cultivars:
Chariot; Nordic; Rhino; Warwick; Firefly; Oxford; Scaldis II; Heron; Reliant II; Spartan II; Minotaur; Reliant IV; Stonehenge
Fertilizer shall be 10 -20 -20 analysis. A different analysis of fertilizer may be used provided the 1 -2 -2 ratio is maintained and the
rate of application adjusted to provide the same amount of plant food as a 10 -20 -20 analysis and as directed.
TEMPORARY SEEDING:
Fertilizer shall be the same analysis as specified for Seeding and Mulching and applied at the rate of 400 pounds and seeded at the
rate of 50 pounds per acre. German Millet, or Browntop Millet shall be used in summer months and rye grain during the remainder
of the year. The Engineer will determine the exact dates for using each kind of seed.
FERTILIZER TOPDRESSING:
Fertilizer used for topdressing shall be 16 -8 -8 grade and shall be applied at the rate of 500 pounds per acre. A different analysis of
fertilizer may be used provided the 2 -1 -1 ratio is maintained and the rate of application adjusted to provide the same amount of plant
food as 16 -8 -8 analysis and as directed.
SUPPLEMENTAL SEEDING:
The kinds of seed and proportions shall be the same as specified for Seeding and Mulching, and the rate of application may vary
from 25# to 75# per acre. The actual rate per acre will be determined prior to the time of topdressing and the Contractor will be
notified in writing of the rate per acre, total quantity needed, and areas on which to apply the supplemental seed. Minimum tillage
equipment, consisting of a sod seeder shall be used for incorporating seed into the soil as to prevent disturbance of existing
vegetation. A clodbuster (ball and chain) may be used where degree of slope prevents the use of a sod seeder.
The minimum mowing height on this project shall be six inches.
BASIN WIDTH VARIES
I.D. /6 MIP
NOT LESS THAN 6'
I,D, /6 MIN,
NOT LESS THAN 6'
I' PER FOOT
BUT NOT LESS THAN 12'
NOR MORE THAN 24'
NORMAL EARTH F❑UNDATI ❑N
- r ILL
GROUND LINE
4PACT AFTER
'E IS PLACED
'RI ❑R TO
NCEMENT OF FILL
- 'r FILL
UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FOUNDATION
GROUND LINE
4PACT AFTER
'E IS PLACED
'RI ❑R TO
aCEMENT OF FILL
P7r irrr iP'P'QTr ir, P7APPTr
GENERAL N❑TES1
I.D. = THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL INSIDE DIAMETER DIMENSI ❑N
❑,D, = THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL OUTSIDE DIAMETER DIMENSI ❑N
H = THE FILL HEIGHT MEASURED VERTICALLY AT ANY POINT
ALONG THE PIPE FROM THE TOP OF THE PIPE TO THE TOP
OF THE EMBANKMENT AT THAT POINT,
D❑ NOT OPERATE HEAVY EQUIPMENT OVER ANY PIPE CULVERT
UNTIL THE PIPE CULVERT HAS BEEN PROPERLY BACKFILLED AND
COVERED WITH AT LEAST 3 FEET OF APPROVED MATERIAL.
LOOSELY PLACED SELECT MATERIAL CLASS III OR CLASS II, TYPE 1
FOR PIPE BEDDING, LEAVE SECTI ❑N DIRECTLY BENEATH PIPE
UNC❑MPACTED AS PIPE SEATING AND BACKFILL WILL ACCOMPLISH
C❑MPACTI ❑N,
SPRINGLINE OF PIPE
SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL CLASS III OR CLASS II, BELOW
SPRINGLINE
® APPROVED SUITABLE LOCAL MATERIAL ABOVE SPRINGLINE
0 UNDISTURBED EARTH MATERIAL
�xY SELECT MATERIAL CLASS V OR VI FOR F❑UNDATI ❑N CONDITIONING,
ENCAPSULATE WITH ENGINEERING FABRIC
FILL
�3.0� — — — — — —
15' OUTLET CULVERT
EXISTING GROUND ELEVATI ❑N
BASIN CROSS SECTI ❑N DETAIL
SW 2
12 -1 -14 Revise
storm water
.``'��,,N CAR II ���''•.
SEAL
4Signe025536 _=
�
Ld
n m
M
cu
I
z� o
H UQ
> 00
rr ^^
rvJ ��00 CU
Pq
V) z CU
Ld <Z L3 CL U a�
o i­i LLI
w - IY2::QQ�
= LLJ o > I-
LLI = J o
z �L0
I
0
Q z
LLI M
z 00
Q 00
..
n/
W
<E
z
Q
LJ�
U
Q o
I a M
z
LD I z
>_ H Q LLJ
w J J
oZ �/ �Q�
� � Col
W
n Ln_J
� CU LL]
�
QF-1z
LJ—
COUNTY: HAYW❑ ❑D
❑WNSHIP:
AYNESVILLE
WATERSHED:
FRENCH BROAD
SCALE:
INSERTS: 1' =30'

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0673C94A- D7E7- 4COC- BD54- 1080367F7017
GENERAL NOTES:
1. Storm Water control shall control a minimum calculated volume
as described in table below.
2. Precast concrete drainage structures may be used.
3. Draw down time is 3 days.
IMPERVI ❑US AREA
L❑CATI ❑N
AREA (SFT)
TOTAL AREA
392,040
ON -SITE
BUILDINGS
40,000
033
PARKING
87,120
#2
ON -SITE
STREETS
9,631
3779
ON -SITE OTHER
21860
0.79
FUTURE
17433
i 1.071
0.75
176,044
40%
■ FUTURE AREA ACCOUNTED FOR IN VOLUME CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE AREA CALCULATI ❑NS
DRAINAGE AREA
NUMBER
TOTAL AREA,
ACRES
IMPERVI ❑US
AREA, ACRES
RUNOFF
VOLUME, CF
#1
033
0.83
2880
#2
1.20
1.09
3779
#3
0.86
0.79
2737
#4
i 1.071
0.75
2644
#5
1 0.751
0.401
1462
�I
RHODES
DB 814/PG 2303
DAM❑UR
DB 396/PG 762
20' SEWER EASEME
18' WALKING TRAIL EX..
BASIN MAINTENANCE/ A
HAYW❑ ❑D R
�s
19
�O,qd
64' X 22' X 5'11" STRUC`NRAL
PLATE ARCH CULVERT
STORM WATER CONVEYANCE DITCH
❑PERTY
BACK
LAKE JUNALUSKA
ASSEMBLY
w
C
Z
PROPERTY a
J
O
Z
x W
J
7
US 276 RUSS AVE
L❑CATI ❑N
LEGEND
TO WAYNESVILL,
TEMP SEDIMENT TRAP
`X WITH BAFFLES
EXJ -,TTNI-j TUI_VEF'T
pISTURBED AREA �j%77j/7 /�
D H C�
SILT FENCE
NEW CONTOURS a�ee
DB 828i PG 1979 ,� / i� I� TTLE
/ PROPOSED
/ 5' CULVERT
�' ' E INV OUT 5 6.5' ARE G SEEDED 0
/ / AREA
�' STORM WATER FLOW DIRECTION
/ TOPRELN2580UTLET 3'X3'
' EEK' F / � TTOM EL 2576'
CONNECT' TO 24' CULVERT I 10' PROPERTY C ❑NSTRUCTI ❑N
STORM WATER
/ PDE- , SETBACK ENTRACE
WAYNESVILLE CHRISTIAN
DE­
-7 I I LINE FELLOWSHIP
/ /� / 1ROPOSE CULVERT PROPOSED CULVERT — iy — c°S — — FXIS i Nu ATER \ ROCK CHECK BASIN
/'/ / INV IN 2577' INV IN 2577' I _ _ \ I— _ 8r7 __�� DB 335/PG 6 8 2
INV OUT 2576.5' INV OUT 2576.5 I— I _ _ -Ct�it' W ,',TER URB C' 1
ST SIN TAT SKIMMER BASIN
I I —�— UTILITY EASEMENT WITH BAFFLES
/ I DRAINAGE AREA #1 DRAINAGE AREA #2 I I ?l — —� -- - - + -- p
0.93 ACRES 1.20 ACRES MWAS — 2576
C =o.9s C =o.9s STORM w TER C g l� L1 TEMPORARY DIVERSION
TORM WATER EMERGENCY OUTLET 3 ✓ —� —�
I L _ —TBP -E _25830' _ -- \ - -�-�-
I EMERGENCY OUTLET 3'X3' —BOTTOM EL 2576' —�
I \173 TOP EL 2580' 1 \\ - — I /
118' wAl IN BOTTOM EL 2576' qg� ��/ —�� �I"? �T \' fi �— _ HANDICAP PARKING SPACE
TIRAIL ET, M NT r �C .EC KING
I I roR, W��Ed etIRBT — - 2 J � ��\ TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION �4
DRAINAGE AREA
15% CULVERT
V'
O 2580
I V OUT 2580 ' LAKE JUNALUSKA
STORM WATER ASSEMBLY
EMERGENCY OUTLET 3'X3'
TOP EL 2582'
BOTTOM EL 2578' DB 640/PG 6 5 4
0 20 40 60 80 100
\ SENI ❑R RESIDENCES AT
LAKE JUNALUSKA
DB 660/PG 280
SW 1
12-1-14 evlse
storm water
SEAL
DoCVsi..ZI215'536
,-
:�,yG �"�,;
4 baaze...'J• .�
12 /�f�d'i$••.
LJJ
C
(v
�
I
z� o
I—i U q LO
~ ¢
/
\
/ O 00
r� Q�00 CU
PQ LZ(U00
� Q LD U
a Z v) o
OL r-i L d
OL = W =>o
Z � U')
� I
\L �
F—I L d (y)
z 00
Q 00
v
LLJ
\<1:S> z
CL
L�
0
r�
V J
U
Q�,D o
I o
o L1J Q �-
I z
r� H
D Q LJ
J J
oz��,DQ-j
�OWCo >
#Ln_j
Ld
n
n
n /H
I__l�
COUNTY: HAYW❑ ❑D
❑WNSHIP:
AYNESVILLE
WATERSHED:
FRENCH BROAD
SCALE:
1 " -50'

Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
49 Cupp Lane, Waynesville, NC 28786
Mr. Martin D. Koon
Pinnacle Properties One, LLC
PO Box 843
Wilkesboro, NC 28697
Dear Mr. Koon:
(828) 452 -0545 (phone)
(828) 452 -0548 (fax)
November 14, 2014
Per our phone conversation on Friday, November 14, 2014, it is my understanding that you agree
to the following:
• You would like to extend the current Option to Purchase and a Contract to Sell with
Pinnacle Properties One, LLC and Harmon Graham Properties, LLC for another 90 days
passed our previous deadline of November 30, 2014 to February 28, 2015 at no additional
cost to Pinnacle Properties One, LLC.
• You also agree to adhere to the footprint drawing produced by our engineer, Wanda
Austin, for the physical building and parking area on this site.
• The developer will ensure storm water drainage is maintained as designed. Any future
stream crossing to provide property access shall be spanning structures.
If these statements are correct, can you please sign below verifying that the above statements are
true and you are willing to abide by these statements.
Sincerely,
John C. Harmon
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
I agree to the
Martin D. Koon, Pinnacle Properties One, LLC

A4 X.
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Michael Ellison, Director John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Ecosystem Enhancement Program Secretary
October 28, 2014
John Harmon
Harmon Graham Properties, LLC
PO Box 180
Waynesville, NC 28786 Expiration of Acceptance: April 28, 2015
Project: Jule Noland Drive County: Haywood
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 -337: An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S.L. 2011 -343.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit /401 Certification /CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation
are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to NCEEP for this impact is determined by
permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 707 -8915.
Sincerely, �&Zw
3 '0_ James. tanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWR Wetlands /401 Unit
David Brown, USAGE- Asheville
Wanda Austin, agent
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: 919 - 707 -89761 Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper
River
CU
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
Buffer Il
Basin
Location
(Sq. Ft.)
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non - Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Impact
French
06010106
0
0
0
1.2
0
0
0
0
Broad
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 707 -8915.
Sincerely, �&Zw
3 '0_ James. tanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWR Wetlands /401 Unit
David Brown, USAGE- Asheville
Wanda Austin, agent
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: 919 - 707 -89761 Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper