20140315 Ver 2_401 Application_20150315

On/ �/c 31y V'z
Envi.ronmen at- eomsultants,
11412 rolls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, RalcWi, NC 27615 • Phcme. (919) W -5900 •
sandee.00m
To US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn Dave Shaeffer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A
Re 4117 Balsam Drive
Raleigh, Wake Co, NC27612
March 23, 2015
S &EC Project # 12529 WI
N C Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn Karen Higgins
Archdale Building – 91h Floor
512 North Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604
On behalf of the owner, Woodybuilt, LLC, please find attached a complete application and supplemental information
requesting written concurrence from the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the N C Division of Water
Resources (DWR) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 18 and General Water
Quality Certification 3890 Please contact me at (919) 846 -5900 if you have any questions or require additional
information
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
4117 Balsam Drive
Project Type
Single family residential
Owner / Applicant
Wood built, LLC
County
Wake
Nearest Town
Raleigh
Waterbody Name
UT to Crabtree Creek
Basin / Sub -basin
Neuse
Index Number
27- 33 -(10)
Class
`C,NSW"
USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres)
00064
Wetland Impact (acres)
0
Open Water impact (acres)
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U S (acres)
00064
Total Stream Impact (linear feet)
31
Zone 1 Buffer Impact (sf)
1362
Zone 2 Buffer impact (sf)
1262
Attachments complete PCN application form & supplemental sheets
DWR application fee $240 00
D R-1 g
EMAIR 2 20
15 ,
DENR — WprER- RESO;,n �' I
d41 3 (SUFFER PERMi ,

w
oaoF ArF9QG
y r
n
O
+f
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A
Applicant Information
1
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps
Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
lb
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 18 or General Permit (GP) number 3890
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps9
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
Q 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express X❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes Q No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
4117 Balsam Drive - Driveway
2b
County
Wake
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Raleigh
2d
Subdivision name
I Lot 91, Laurel Hills West, Section 4
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state project no
n/a
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Woodybuilt, LLC
3b
Deed Book and Page No
B 15647 / P 2250
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Johnny Woody
3d
Street address
8431 Bandford Way, Suite 7
3e
City, state, zip
Raleigh, NC 27615
3f
Telephone no
(919) 841 -4884
3g
Fax no
(919) 841 -4885
3h
Email address
Johnny @woodybuilt com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent Q Other, specify contract purchaser (future home owner)
4b
Name
Benjamin H & Kelly Yannessa
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
n/a
4d
Street address
4117 Balsam Drive
4e
City, state, zip
Raleigh, NC 27612
4f
Telephone no
` call Agent
4g
Fax no
" fax Agent
4h
Email address
" email Agent
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Bob Zarzecki
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Sod & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c
Street address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
5d
City, state, zip
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e
Telephone no
(919) 846 -5900
5f
Fax no
(919) 846 -9467
5g
Email address
bzarzecki @sandec com
Page 2 of 10

B
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property Identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
0786516122
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 8408 Longitude -78 711
1 c
Property size
0 705 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Crabtree Creek (Stream Index No 27- 33 -(10))
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
"C, NSW"
2c
River basin
Neuse 03020201
3
Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
A home has been built on the lot and is near completion The driveway, pipe and stream crossing have been installed The remainder of the property
and stream buffer has been left wooded consisting of a mature mesic mixed hardwood forest
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (Intermittent and perennial) on the property 147
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Single family residential home and driveway
3e Describe the overall project In detail, Including the type of equipment to be used
Home & Driveway - Excavators and heavy equipment were used to install the existing 31 foot long corrugated metal arch pipe (59 "Hx81 "W)
4
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments DWR # 14 -0315 (no Corps determination)
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas>
Name (if known) Bob Zarzecki
Agency /Consultant Company
Other S &EC, PA
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
The Corps has not yet visited the property However, DWR has conducted stream determinations and approved and authorization certificate to impact
the Neuse River Buffer S &EC evaluated the property on February 19, 2015 and determined that the only jurisdictional waters is the perennial stream
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (Including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b
No
If yes, explain In detail according to "help file" instructions
Section 404 or 401, only DWR # 14 -0315 authorization certificate to impact Neuse River buffers
6
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries Q Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area Impacted
2a
Wetland Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b
Type of Impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
Impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts-
0
2h Comments
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or Intermittent stream Impacts (Including temporary Impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites Impacted
3a
Stream Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type of Impact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
Intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Crabtree Creek
PER
Corps
9
31
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31
31 Comments
The pipe has already been installed It was installed at existing stream bed elevation, due to the presence of bedrock
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1 4 January 2009

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed Impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indivi ually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
Impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of Impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of Impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
i
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total,
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
J
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer Impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Driveway
UT to Crabtree Creek
No
1,362
1,262
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts
1,362
1,262
61 Comments Note Buffer impacts previously approved were 2,011 sf of Zone 1 and 1,344 sf of Zone 2 (DWR #14 -0315) Total now 731 less
2
Page 5 of 10

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The owner intended to remove the driveway culvert and construct a bridge over the stream However, the costs were prohibitive and the owner was
able to obtain City of Raleigh flood certification for the existing culvert As such, the owner no longer proposes a bridge and requests the stream
impacts to allow the existing pipe to remain The driveway crossed the stream at a perpendicular angle to minimize impacts Also, the existing
impacts require 731 sf less buffer impacts than the previously proposed bridge
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through construction techniques
The contractor installed silt fencing and ground cover to control sediment runoff to the stream A concrete headwall on the upstream side and rock
headwall on the downstream side were used to minimize impacts
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from In -lieu fee program Is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 14 January 2009

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes Q No
buffer mitigation
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required-
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project Include or Is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan Included? If no, explain why
No diffuse flow plan is provided as the project only involves a perpendicular driveway crossing to a single
the
❑ Yes ❑X No
family
home and there are no concentrated or new stormwater conveyances on property
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project?
23
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
The project is a single family home and driveway on a residential lot in Raleigh with approximately 23% impervious
surface and no stormwater
collection
system, and as such does not trigger the need for a SMP from the City of Raleigh (or DWR as it's
low density)
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
n/a
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply)
®Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)
❑Session Law 2006 -246
[]Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8of10
PCN Form —Version 14 January 2009

F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter)
Comments
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
E] Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit applications
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
The owner received approval from DWR for impacts to the Neuse River buffers, a culvert was installed during construction which was intended to be
temporary prior to constructing the permanent bridge The bridge costs were determined to be prohibitive and as such the owner has requested the
stream impacts for the culvert to remain in place
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
This is a single family residence on an existing lot within an established neighborhood, and as such will no result in an additional cumulative direct or
indirect impacts
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater from the property will discharge to the existing City of Raleigh sanitary sewer system An existing sewer line bisects the property The
City and DENR will ensure available capacity
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Q No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes Q No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
-
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NHP database and mapping
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH Mapper - property is located in the piedmont of NC well away from any EFH areas
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO - HPOWEB mapper and website
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
see comment below, excerpt from DFIRM is attached
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination
FEMA & NC Flood Mapper websites - The FEMA regulated floodplain is located approximately 250 ft downstream Although, the City has will approve
a flood certification for the development (see attached certification form), as the new base flood elevation of 280 ft NAVD88 extends onto the property
( Digitally signed by Bob Zarzecki
BobZarzecki,o= 5 &EC,PA,
ki �DNcn=
ou= Wetlands Department,
Bob Zarzec
S &EC, PA
emad_bzarzecki @sandeccom,c =US
2015
March 23, 2015
Bob Zarzecki
Date 03 23 08 02 21 - 04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Swte 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone [phone] • Fax (919) W -9467
sandec coin
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description 4117 Balsam Drive S &EC Project #12529
Date February 2015
The Department of the Army
U S Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn Dave Shaeffer Field Office; Raleigh Re ug latory Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Sod &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S &EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site Investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U S subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S &EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditlons.This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S &EC staff. You should call S &EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN) 0786516122
Book/Page 015647/02250
Site Address- 4117 Balsam Di ive
City, County, State Raleigh,Wake Co, NC
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Woodybuilt, LLC (Attu Johnny Woody)
Address 8431 Bandford Way, Suite 7, Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone No . (919) 841 -4884 Fax No.. (919) 8414885 Mobile No.. (919) 369 -5010
Email [e-mail]
t (I LPL G o �mtM+��l JA WOO Z Za
de�easz- �xrnt) —� Date
We hereby certify the above information subinllted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our know /edge.

. N
OD O C O
a 03
ton o o
t11 W N N
T N
N W
a O
EE O
Z 4 U N
D1
V U ❑
Q1 N
U U
LO v o
.a u o
o
N O
m N
\
M
m
m
❑
4)
w
I
S.1
A
4
CL v r
U
Z n
4 44 '+
C V'
Z y r{
C mM
❑ o
Q � v
U U
� � o
Wl H
ma
Z
041
IM& N
N
W U C
�o .1 N
!� m
M
W > M
o y
�u o
m
N°
H
'T-+
CB 'y ="'`', •' ` `
3 ++ `bid, X -�, atia ✓u v �.:it�!?ji_I '�
r
is t ;�,4,�' h co
rm
q "S'r�
ru
f Sr1 t-1D ,•,�.� a r'.� � f"'. =rte •, y� 1
r z�r
%y�'jc...
Srt Wynn (; �q y'{kP`T��'1•ly� }j- ty ~,'i rL
lee
�y-t•-u�%4'�f'�.�10, pd 1 i•}Ry'y��� ;f�;�' it ?yrYN'''('o
LB
47, l i
rm
Ln
rL
MV it Y� Y4�kF���h.8,+°E� t+.,
3.
S Fp �: t]ir�� tt
b Q
4S th
CU
L n
ru
0 La
a tihuj ? 4y

NC Division of Water Resources
DWR#14-0315
April 8, 2014
Authorization Certificate &
Vicinity Maps

■
.���A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvada, III
Governor Secretary
April 8, 2014
DWR # 14 -0315
Wake County
Ben Yannessa
4313 Dyer Court
Raleigh, NC 27604;
Subject: AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE PER THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER
PROTECTION RULES (1SA NCAC 028.0233) WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
4117 Balsam Drive
Dear Mr: Yannessa:
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your application
dated March 29, 2014 and received by the Division of Water Resources (Division) on April 1, 2014.
Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with
your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -
Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations, This Authorization Certificate shall expire
five (5) years from the date of this letter, -
This approval requires you to comply with the following conditions:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific and general
conditions of the Buffer Rules are met. No other impacts are`approved, including incidental
impacts.
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Amount Approved
(units)
(units)
Permanent
Temporary
Buffers —Zone 1
2,011 (square feet)
0 (square feet)
Buffers — Zone 2
1,344 (square feet )
0 (square feet)
NMCarol
)W&M,
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org location 3800 Barnett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fox (919) 788 -7159 1.877=6.23.6748
An Equal Opportuacty/Mmialnre Adlon Empbyer— 50% Reoda00% Post Consumer Paper

4117 Balsam Drive
DWR# 14 -0315
BUFFER APPROVAL
Page i of 3
No Waste, Spoil, Solids. or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within
these boundaries,,approyed,under this authorization shall be dearly marked with orange
warning fencing (ortsimilar high- visibilityrmateriai),for the areas,that have been approved to
r -� �r'sh �_ �r1.w ��'`j E. -J r--� t
infiinge-within the- buffer,-wetland or waterprior to-any land disfurbing,activitles tovns`ure— -
compliance with 15 NCAC 02H .0500.
4. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Buffer Authorization.
If you_changeyour project, you must notify the Division and you maybe requlred to submit a
new application package with the appropriate fee. If-the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this approval letter and is responsible for complying with all conditions.
S. This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested.
This Buffer Authorization can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 1508
by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings
(hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at
http: / /www.nco4h.com/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at (919) 431 -3000 for information.
Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH. A
petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing
fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday between 8:00am
and=S.OQpm;,excluding official_state;holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at (919) 431 -3100, provided the original and one copy of "the
petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5) business
days following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
if sending by First Class Mail if sending via delivery service
via the US Postal Service: (e.g. UPS, FedEx):

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714
4117 Balsam Drive
DWR# 24-0315
BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 3 of 3
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27609 -6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to DENR:
Lacy Presnell, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601
k
°'Please send one 120 - -
(1 'pY of thy- to --
if sending by First Class Mail
via the US Postal Service:
Karen Higgins
NC DENR -DWR - Webscape Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
If sending via delivery service
(e.g. UPS, FedEx):
Karen Higgins
NC DENR- D%dR— Webscape Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street -
Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter completes the review of the Division under the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules as
described in 15A NCAC 028.0233. Please contact Cherri Smith at_919- 791 -4251 or
cherri.smith0ricdennizov if you have any questions or concerns.
S' rely,
Danny Smiwi
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
cc: DWR RRO 401 fifes
Martin Richmond; 5304 Avent Ferry Rd.; Raleigh, NC 27606

USGS - RALEIGH WEST QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA -WAKE CO.
7.5- MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
III, � '•`
ants
WISIN W.,
MA A
t.
. t d mali'RAMLLi Mu L_ RAW
E01011iW4AmLLf MW
PROPOSED BENJAMIN H. & KELLY YANESSA
PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 4117 BALSAM DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27612

WAKE COUNTY 1970 SOILS SURVEY MAP
1
i
PA-
T
n
0
a
p
WAKE COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 38
PROPOSED BENJAMIN H. & KELLY YANESSA
PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 4117 BALSAM DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27612

FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
SEE FIS KMRT FOR IOW DESCRI� AN NM IIAR
-MOnLL Bw fYwa FrYrim00D
1101 Rsa GpN mAAL aO AM YLM
SpfCIAI ROW
NAiARDAIFAS I_�tl���
0 2 %—.1 C— Fboe. —, A1on
d ! 4 Anna Cna.ee f Iota n!n Arerye
Dap, Ins T� OT fool a Wnn PMnge
Mess of Ins iEan Dne s­ m". '- - •
— F—fnrd —I %A-
axEYARlASOf C Fboo Neraa: .
IOW MAiA� ksennfbd[eCFYxq beY 0leto law
Sr Nae
OIXER Are%Dau
D.I%A C
nnutl C ra Ea Devi IEe
AREAS nence FlooRpbin: •
�WM. [uhKt, a Slam $en.
_® �m.aAea a ne.,�e�ary A�ean.a
CiNEpµ levee, Dne.. fbowan
StRUCTIgES �• Mon- e[neOiUa !arse. PYe.afbo0etll
x.m vmina �meu[w.♦I O.ea m�Y
Wee Rtlarol GeadeE[weeT Earn maY
e>•we�0i Gordan. E. NCFW S. a Oercnn+en
ef— Poss Sednrsnn 1YAmW Cnro
r
W. SMT001 EM M
— 1 - - - - -- CouW Rrsrf Bwln
Fl OW Be 1.
Iy1a/eR1Yt FeeEea
OTHER IarW tlSIWF
1EAIURf6 hnaEltllonA uetrT
NOTES TO USERS
~���rr. `. e�w`r.. era >, rr�r•r.r
�. r r'llni tl 1100♦ Y 51Fw Amn 51YwN
*a KRn1Y0n
SCALE
I kWh -50Dt- 1SAM
o xsE sao tAWO
FM
McYn
o ]s IsD am
PANEL LOCATOR
c
u� NORTH CAROLINA -
r
— 0786
a _
�7w
1�
U
C
�])
V/•
� ffWlWlnd no�i'�MIFI LIM
• �: 1t I
.i
i�
C
f. •
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
SEE FIS KMRT FOR IOW DESCRI� AN NM IIAR
-MOnLL Bw fYwa FrYrim00D
1101 Rsa GpN mAAL aO AM YLM
SpfCIAI ROW
NAiARDAIFAS I_�tl���
0 2 %—.1 C— Fboe. —, A1on
d ! 4 Anna Cna.ee f Iota n!n Arerye
Dap, Ins T� OT fool a Wnn PMnge
Mess of Ins iEan Dne s­ m". '- - •
— F—fnrd —I %A-
axEYARlASOf C Fboo Neraa: .
IOW MAiA� ksennfbd[eCFYxq beY 0leto law
Sr Nae
OIXER Are%Dau
D.I%A C
nnutl C ra Ea Devi IEe
AREAS nence FlooRpbin: •
�WM. [uhKt, a Slam $en.
_® �m.aAea a ne.,�e�ary A�ean.a
CiNEpµ levee, Dne.. fbowan
StRUCTIgES �• Mon- e[neOiUa !arse. PYe.afbo0etll
x.m vmina �meu[w.♦I O.ea m�Y
Wee Rtlarol GeadeE[weeT Earn maY
e>•we�0i Gordan. E. NCFW S. a Oercnn+en
ef— Poss Sednrsnn 1YAmW Cnro
r
W. SMT001 EM M
— 1 - - - - -- CouW Rrsrf Bwln
Fl OW Be 1.
Iy1a/eR1Yt FeeEea
OTHER IarW tlSIWF
1EAIURf6 hnaEltllonA uetrT
NOTES TO USERS
~���rr. `. e�w`r.. era >, rr�r•r.r
�. r r'llni tl 1100♦ Y 51Fw Amn 51YwN
*a KRn1Y0n
SCALE
I kWh -50Dt- 1SAM
o xsE sao tAWO
FM
McYn
o ]s IsD am
PANEL LOCATOR
�,. 3]100]86001
05'01'06
��Coa IYA1pFNIf00D1116URNKl PROGRAM RKK:RAM
u� NORTH CAROLINA -
r
— 0786
a _
�7w
1�
U
C
�])
V/•
� ffWlWlnd no�i'�MIFI LIM
i�
C
IL
R
C
0
i7
Z
�,. 3]100]86001
05'01'06

4117 Balsam Drive
PIN:0786516122
Real Estate ID: 0052117
Map Name: 0786 19
Owner: WOODYBUILT LLC
Mailing Address 1: 8431 SANDFORD WAY STE
7
Mailing Address 2: RALEIGH NC 27615
Deed Book: 015647
Deed Page: 02250
Deed Date: 05/01/2014
Deeded Acreage: 0.73
Assessed Building Value: $0
Assessed Land Value: $35,000
Total Assessed Value: $35,000
Billing Class: Business
Property Description: L091 GR PT LAUREL
HILLS WEST SE4
Heated Area: 0
Site Address: 4117 BALSAM DR
City: RALEIGH
Township: Meredith
Year Built: 0
Total Sale Price: $3,500
Sale Date: 01/01/1968
Land Class: VACANT
Old Parcel Number: 404 - 00000 -0022
A
0 50 100 200 Feet
I t i i I i t I I
1 inch = 100 feet
Disclaimer
Waps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied
,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

C ity of Raleigh Flood
Certification
and
Engineering Report of
Hydrology &Hydraulics

4•�,�{��,. .1 I � r ' t +��. _r ----fir
`U Ci
iva��Y- t ;�l � ;Litt•? ,.�,U;,h, l ., �*''�xi;a, x�tkisRr: {.t� � v �.gw • htA�
Stormwater Udlity Division — Development Plan Review
,One Exchange Plaza''Suke 304, PO Box 580 Raleigh, NC 27802
T f:__
phone [phone]
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Building Street Address L - ,'�
'City
state > C
I Zip Code `'•a
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
slab 13
crawJepac ®Q
Other
E8t`i bUlMigg wil 1a jWbjI !0co g enclo1sure p
1. 8gaem foolego of ¢revel e`p" o "r onaloauro(a) l�0 1 aq. tt
Z.. Nuint►er of permanent flood openings In the erarvl'apaea or
oaolo`surots) walls within iAD,eabovo adjacent grade O
8. ToW not area of flood oponfiga 0 sq. Inches
For a bulidlno with an attached oaraoo
1. 8quari tootago of attached garago .% sq. K
2. N�imbar of parmnnent flood opcnhigo to the ettaohed garage
'walls Whhln 1.0'fL ebWn ed)acent grade p
9, Total not @me of Rood openings 0 sq. Inches
t3UIL_DING E_L1;VAT16N
ATIOfff��Nyyy.y�j�
U 1 �,Ta! bao��N s• 1,���.+3���T
IQN�IQ:j{yC �RsM
LM U
-2444
Top of bottom floor (Including basement, crawl space or enclosure), Z$t�, feet NAVD 88
Top of the nvA higher floor % 2 G'. it, feet NAVD tie
Lowest elovadoh'bf machinery" or equipment senrlcing_the buil_tting•(Inpluding MVAC, ductwork, etc.) Z.8Z,9 Meet NAVD 88
Lowest Adjacent (fintshed)'grade(L'AG) Z8 feet NAVD 88
Hiehist adjacent (finished) grade (HAG) 2', ;S feet NAVD 88
i codify tltrat the_lnfbmratlon piovidedon thls CoOkete repnisehtts my best`etflorts to lnterpiW the data evuilabte.
Certinees'Nante
UceneeNumbeVL,- ,
'Tide
Company
Telephone
Address TA&P v.A. fl
city
state VA,C_, Zip Code Z?
Slgnetu
Date ,.
SEAL
?.n SEAL
-2444
!N, r'
Page 11 '�1111111��`
www.ralelghnc.gov
tevWon 121112
0

ENGINEERING REPORT
OF
HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS
For
Mr. Johnny Woody
Date. 16, February, 2015
►"J
JOHN W. HARRIS, P.E.
CONSULTING ENGINEER, Inc.
www harrisene net
5112 Bur Oak Circle
Raleigh, N C 27612
(919) 789 -0744

PROJECT NARRATIVE:
We were contacted by Mr. Johnny Woody regarding a driveway pipe crossing of a Neuse
Riparian Buffered stream located in an existing residential area of Raleigh. The approved plans (TRN-
380326) for this site were completed by David Blevins, P.E. of Development Engineering, Inc. Mr.
Blevins has collaborated and advised us during our re- evaluation process. The current approved design
involves the removal of an existing (un- permitted) driveway arch culvert to be replaced with a bridge to
span the creek. The removal of the existing culvert, a 59" H X 81" W corrugated arch pipe, and the
construction of a bridge to span the stream are considered extraordinarily expensive.
Our staff decided to review the previous analysis, the physical facts of the field conditions and the
method used in computations. It was our opinion that a more detailed analysis, and careful examination
of the physical facts could possibly provide a different, more refined and accurate result.
VICINITY MAP:
�B
NINA
� rt
ANN
At
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
There are several allowable methods for this type of analysis to determine the theoretical
prediction of rainfall run -off. The NRSCS method is one that assigns curve numbers based upon soils and
zoning and is generally considered the most reliable for areas greater than 100 acres. Based upon the City
of Raleigh requirements, this is the preferred method to be used.
The drainage basin is basically characterized as existing residential development with some
pockets of O & I and commercial that are in the upper most reaches of the drainage basin. In accordance
with the City of Raleigh requirements existing ponds and pipe systems although creating a theoretical
longer time of concentration, are not considered or quantified in this analysis.

We are analyzing the basin to determine how shape and character affect the run -off and find that
this does play a significant role. Our analysis used a detailed basin delineation. This delineation is based
upon both gis topo and on -site field reconnaissance to determine if edge areas via piping system
contribute to our study area. The onsite work involved the physical inspection of perimeter pockets to
verify the exact contributing drainage sub - basins. The detail applied here is needed to determine a more
accurate and realistic basin run -off condition.
The total drainage area as determined from our delineation is 221.83 acres.
Per City of Raleigh requirements, the culvert crossing for this driveway will be required to pass
the 10 -yr storm and should not affect the upstream property neighbor with the 100 -yr storm event
backwater.
To begin this analysis, a curve number "CN" needs to be determined.
This will be decided based upon both the zoning and soil types.

The zoning areas are quantified as follows:
Zonin
ID
Area
R -4
A -1
146.53
R -6
A -2
38.31
0 -1 -1
A -3
4.5
0 -1 -2
A -4
16.27
SC
A -5
16.22
Total
221.83
The specific zoning areas are delineated below:
`���■ ►�� iii :
NU S
ON PC
OP
� ��111■ III � � ♦ � �
%I►� %i>�r ►� �` � � �� r *� Iii �ai:`� .�� ���
WR
Soil types and their soil characteristics in the drainage basin are as follows;
Cg
soil class B
Ap
soil class B
Ag
soil class B
Me
soil class B
Wn
soil class B
Since all the soils are of the same soils class we did not feel an exhibit was needed.

The zoning districts in the subject basin are as follows and shown with their relevant CN values;
R -4
CN for "B "=
75
R -6
CN for "B"=
80
O -I
CN for "B "=
97
SC
CN for "B "=
98
A composite CN is determined based upon the individual
areas of each zoning district...
Use a CN of 79
Determine the Time of Concentration Tc
The Tc is determined for each of three physical categories... sheet flow, shallow flow and
concentrated channel flow.
Sheet flow;
Sheet Flow
from formula
Tc 0.007(nL) ^0.8 0.296372
P2 ^.5S ^.4 0.591503 x.60 hrs
Based upon:
n 0.24 For grass
L 450 Flow length
P2 8 100yr run -off depth
S 0.02 Ft /ft for sheet flow
Shallow flow;
Swallow Flow from
formula
Tc L /(3600 *V) =0.04 hrs
Based upon
L 450 Flow length
V 3.2 Velocity for 0.04
Composite
"CN"
Zoning
ID
Area
CN
Percent
CN
R -4
A -1
146.53
75
0.66
49.5
R -6
A -2
38.31
80
0.17
13.8
0 -1 -1
A -3
4.5
55
0.02
1.1
0 -1 -2
A -4
16.27
97
0.07
7.1
Sc
A -5
16.22
98
0.07
7.2
Total
221.83
Total CN
1.00
79
Use a CN of 79
Determine the Time of Concentration Tc
The Tc is determined for each of three physical categories... sheet flow, shallow flow and
concentrated channel flow.
Sheet flow;
Sheet Flow
from formula
Tc 0.007(nL) ^0.8 0.296372
P2 ^.5S ^.4 0.591503 x.60 hrs
Based upon:
n 0.24 For grass
L 450 Flow length
P2 8 100yr run -off depth
S 0.02 Ft /ft for sheet flow
Shallow flow;
Swallow Flow from
formula
Tc L /(3600 *V) =0.04 hrs
Based upon
L 450 Flow length
V 3.2 Velocity for 0.04

Channel flow;
Because the shape of this basin is long and basically narrow in comparison the channel flow will
be a major factor in the concentration time at the point of our analysis.
Channel
per formula
assume an average channel shape for the study
area
V= (((1.491(RAO.667)(SAO.511/n)
=2.4
fps
R
2
Hydraulic Radius
S
0.02
slope
Channel
n
0.14
manning's
L
7780
length of thread
b,od i��a
P
25
wetted perimeter
bot width and height of 2 sides
A
50
area of flow
depth times width
V
velocity
fflIa Tc = sheet +shallow +chann 0.5 +0.
The peak run -off flow for the 10 -yr and 100 -yr were computed with the use of the HydraFlow
Express software by IntelliSolve.

Hydrology Report
!"am Expn,aa br rnM.olw
Surly. Fib 1S 2M 5, 221 PM
<Name>
HydmWaph type
= SCS
Peak discharge (cfs)
= 204.44
Storm frequency (yrs)
= 10
Time interval (min)
= 1
Drainage area (ac)
= 221.830
Curve number (CN)
= 79
Basin Slope (%)
= n/a
Hydraulic length (ft)
= nla
Tc method
= User
Time of cons. (min)
= 87
Total precip. (in)
= 425
Storm Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration (hrs)
= 24
Shape factor
= 484
thOOWWh VOMW - 1.750,154 (aunt 40.179 (OM
Runoff Hydrograph
0 (Cft) 10-yr irrowwwy 0 (Cs)
210.00
180.00
150.00
120.00
90.00
60.00
30.00
000
210.00
180.00
150.00
120.00
90.00
60.00
30.00
000
0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0 27.0
Tkne (hrs)
FkN W EW . Gap • 204.44 (ds)

Hydrology Report
Hyd aWw Emp� by YNM" A
&M ft. Fab 16 2D16,2:26 PM
<Name>
Hydrograph type
- SCS
Peak discharge (cfs)
- 520.76
Storm frequency (yrs)
- 100
Time interval (min)
- 1
Drainage area (ac)
- 221.830
Curve number (CN)
- 79
Basin Slope ( %)
- n/a
Hydraulic length (ft)
- n/a
Tc method
- User
Time of conc. (min)
= 87
Total precip. (in)
- 7.95
Storm Distribution
- Type II
Storm duration (hrs)
- 24
Shape factor
- 484
HydWWh yak me - 4.408.206 (aft 101201(ad)
Runoff Hydrograph
p (da) 100-yr fr9quwW a (oft)
560.00
480.00
400.00
820.00
240.00
180.00
80.00
0 00
660.00
480.00
400.00
320.00
240.00
160.00
80.00
0.00
0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0 27.0
Tines Mrs)
Runoff Hyd - Op - 520.76 (ds)
To properly model the run -off flows thru the study area of the stream system we will use the Hec-
Ras program as developed by the US Army COE.

In our review of previous studies for this culvert we were made aware that there was an on -site
topographic survey. We have been given permission by David Blevins, PE to use this topographic
information in our study. The following is from David Blevins, P.E.
In most studies, crossections are input into the Hes -Ras program in a generalized manor using
only a minimum of points which depicts the channel shape in it's basic form. Due to the
complexity of the channel in this area with a variety of slopes and retaining walls, our
r—
S
s�
r on
rilfll' +
1 , 1IS
1 AL
1
I
s win VU r
\
so
,•gyp
MAN rru sl
, : , •��� ; ��
r&M
�� 1
��
r
N an
In most studies, crossections are input into the Hes -Ras program in a generalized manor using
only a minimum of points which depicts the channel shape in it's basic form. Due to the
complexity of the channel in this area with a variety of slopes and retaining walls, our

crossections where developed to more closely resemble and match the existing detailed conditions
and reflect more appropriate flow values.
The crossection locations as shown below, were chosen to reflect the study area and the location
of the culvert in question.
*or
ooc
"Z -
oac -
cat _ *` so
y - �
tge -
-
fads -
r ` _ - vc� - _ - - --T - -,k=
ss
,► fit` - _ �! -'iit - °_
Qtrtt / I
An
'y2 n
01 I �t
Lar�+?r /
DOOM
Vb
srQ � 4 II' bet
u
1
The existing is shown without the installed culvert. Also, in the "post" condition run, an
additional crossection at station 2+43 was added.

Schematic
r_
Ch anne
The result of the "pre" culvert Hec -Ras analysis was as follows;

Prorile:
JWI+Pre -rovX& PWn: Pre Dev Plan 2/1512015
ChwmWPA wd,1
tar
1 I
E:i too YR
1 i
1
- I }
WS 100 YR
i l
i i
EG t0 YR
10YR
F
dt 100 YR
Clil 10 YR
�
baud
I I I I i
l i l i l l I I I I
l i
280
I I I I 1 I
-
i I
I I
276
I I
I I I I
1 1 1 I l 1 -
1 1 I
276
I
i
(- -.
274
j � 1
I
{ i 1
1
ill I
272
0 5a ,00 150 200 460
AAan Channel Dlslance Ihl

The resultant crossections are as follows:
JWH- Pre -revXs Plan: Pre Dev Plan 2/15/2015
JWH- Pre -revXs Plan: Pre Dev Plan 2/15/2015
Sta 243 at upstream pipe
Section 2 +00 Pre
08�=
035 .08
.08 t —.Ot�5 .08
283
282
''II
' �.; i 1 t
it
+ ! � . i i �
1,�:
EG 100 YR
EG 100 YR
Yl.
1
WS 100 YR
WS 100 YR
282
i j i
CA 100 YR
281
i
Crt tOD YR
I
[
EG 10 YR
I
i .�- 4 j .. �
EG 10 YR
T
j'
WS 10 YR
; r
WStOYR
i
Cri 10 YR
I. t
Qil to YR
28,
zeo
Ground
fa. `{'.t.
Gnwrd
} Sta
8ar1k
+ },..j
�
- }
Bar>� Sta
�
I
- t
280
i 11 11 Till I i
279
i
(} ( 1
Ui
J.,
I
fi
279
i
278
I
!
278
t.
�•
TF
277
276
100
105 110 115 120 125 130 135
100
110 120 130 140 150 180
Station (h)
Station (h)
JWH- Pre -revXs Plan: Pre Dev Plan 2/15/2015
JWH- Pre -revxs Plan: Pre Dev Plan 2/15/2015
Section 1 +50 Pre
Sedan 1 +40 Pre Upstream PL
06
--i F .035 E —.OB
.06 a : .035 F —.08
284
Legend
EG 100 YR
011
EG t00 YR
r
+
7-i 7 j
WS 10o YR
i... -
WS 100 YR
G8100 YR
294 -
-I - ..
Crk 100 YR
282
1 I I I I I 1
EG t0 YR
t * t}
EG l0 YR
�._ Jr
WS 10 YR
dr YR
I1. ' ' 1
i
WS10YR
Ground
t
282
a ±�
•
I
Gf
Banc Sta
280-
� -
Bank Sta
l
28
w_......_._
_....
W
- - - - -- - -
278
-
278
278
276
274
274
100
110
120 130 140 150 160
100
110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station (h)
Station (h)

Rr
Plan: Pro Dev Plan 2xI6/2016
Section 1+00 Pre
L*jpnd
_...M....._.
E4100 YR
WS IOOYR
A 100 YA
­EG . 10 V4.
WS 10 YR
arc"
L a.:&. I
0
sulion (it)
JWKPr*-mXs PIsn: Pro Dev Plan 2FIS2015
Section 0.00 Pm Dow4wom PL
O-As + .06-�
EG 100 YR
ii;
171i
iil.
I_
WS 100 YA
'177-T
EGIOYA
WSIOYR
CA 100 YR
ii
0.
4
i j
i4 4
Ork 10 YR
Baste
L m
W ISO 190
sww (it)
JWH•Pr•fevXs Plan: Pro Dev Plan 2116^2016
Section O+SO Pro
S"On M
0
Lownd
EG 100 YR
•
WS 100 YR
ED 10 YR
WSIOYR
Ground
Sack S1a

The water surface profiles for the pre- existing condition are as follows:
HEC-RAS Plan: Pre Development River. Chant* Rear Reach 1
Roach
Rim Sta
Profk
0 Total
Min Ch 9
W.S. Elov
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elver
E.G. Sign
Vol Clrtl
Flow Area
Top W kM
Fralde 8 CM
(de)
00
(ft)
(ft)
00
(Wft)
(we)
(ag W
(t)
Reach 1
243
10 YR
204.00
277.30
279.35
279.35
28022
0.016989
7.49
27.23
15.79
1.01
Reach t
243
100 YR
520 00
277.30
280.93
280.93
28234
0.012820
9.57
57.55
25.37
0.95
Reach 1
200
10 YR
204.00
276.00
778.37
278.31
27924
0.015134
7.50
27.39
15.46
0.98
Reach 1
200
100 YR
520.00
276.00
280.02
280.02
281_39
0.011355
9.61
62.00
29.24
0.91
Reach t
150
10 YR
204.00
274.50
277.41
277.41
278.43
0.016735
8.11
25.50
14.02
0.99
Reach 1
150
100 YR
52000
274.50
Z79.31
279.31
28062
0.010474
9.57
67.37
30.21
0.86
Reach 1
140
10 YR
204.00
274.00
276.68
277.24
0.008393
6.01
33.95
15.38
0.71
Reach 1
140
100 YR
52000,
274.00
77877
278.02
27914
0.008173
6.06
8877
41.13
0.65
Reach 1
100
10 YR
204.00
27320
276.56
276.94
0.004606
4.96
41.00
14.42
0.52
Reach 1
100
100 YR
52000
273.20
277.18
277.18
278,85
0.016503
10.37
50.31
16.77
1.00
Reach 1
50
10 YR
204.00
272.50
276.69
276.78
0.000724
2.33
89.05
32.90
0.23
Reach 1
50
100 YR
520 00
272.50
277.55
277.87
0.002059
4.58
121.01
42.48
0.41
Reach 1
0
10 YR
1 204.00
272-101
276.70
273.891
276741
00003651
1 .61
126.76
44.11
0.17
Reaeh 1
0
100 YR
520.00
272.10
277.60
275.07
277.75
0.001038
3.06
169.38
1 50.551
0.29
The 2 +00 crossection is the upstream property line and the 2+43 crossection is just prior to the upstream
driveway culvert.
Our focus will be on the water surface elevations at crossections 2+00 and 2 +43. We will examine the
"post conditions with respect to...
1) Does the culvert pass the 10 -yr storm.
2) Where do the 100 -yr "pre & post" water surface elevations converge.
Schematic with Culvert:
w
��

Post Profile:
The profile graphic does not do a good job of showing the top of the road/driveway but there is sufficient
cover over the pipe as shown in the crossections.

Relevant crossections:
test- culvert Plan: Post Dev Plan 2115/2015 IM-m*md Plan: Post Dev Plan WI5M15
Sta243 Section 2+00
C.06+— -035 j- .06 Cas+—.ox .06-----]
2821
J.: r:G I OD YA -'-'r+ �T— -I-
I EG 100 YR
It
WS 100 YR WS 100 YR
I ..1-1 4, --t—I
T1
IT
1- —00- 281- EG 10 YR
281-
E-G 10 WS 10 YR
Ground
Crit 10 YR
- Ti �. I' I; � 1 11 1 i , i I lit
WS 10 YR EW.: St.
41 - 2w
4 -4-7
'41
-4
Be: Sia
279-
ti
279-
278-
277-
7--
2n
276+--
100 106 110 115 li6­11:k661136 100 110 130 140 1 100
Station (ft) Station (ft)
test- culvert Plan; Post Dev Plan 2/15/2015 test- culvert Plan: Post Dev Plan 21512015
Section 1+50 Section 1+40 Upstream Property Line
.00 + .035 4---.08 --r• — -035 .06— 11
284- Levnd 2841
100 YR
i EG 100 R
L4
j�i } t.1
WS 100 YR WS 100 YR
;14- 4 1 E-G 10 YR
Eb�IOYR IIT' 44 It
WS10YR INS 10 YR
4. 1 ■ 4..
4 4
:Iii it I
I
Ground
Bast.
T
28G-
280
2M- 278-
ki.
T
V4'
4j
276- 276-
I -1i ljni] f
274
1W 110 120 130 140 150 100 170 100 110 120 130 140 150 100 170
Station (ft) Station (ft)
YR

Notice that the 10 -yr storm is passed by the culvert and although the 100 -yr storm does flow over the
driveway that is acceptable.
test - culvert
Plan: Post Dev Plan 2/15/2015
test - culvert
Plan: Post Dev Plan
2/15/2015
Section 1 +20
06
.035 >' a 06
.06
.03-> —.03 —i
08
284
L�pefld
264
end
'
EG 100 YR
°} i-
< ,
EG 100 YR
WS too YR
i
z
WS 100 YR
262
EG t0 YR
262
i
+ I i { =
EG 10 YR
WS 10 YR
C I
WS 10 YR
'41 00 YR
* , , , •
• Crk 100 YR
10 YR
280
t
280
t ' t .._f..t.. -•
Ground
GrcTund
Bank Sta
Bank Sta
278
279
uj
W
uj
1
4w-
}�
-�
_1
276
276
t... �.. _ ...
).
.. .
274
274
I
.
1
1
272
272
100
120
140 160 160
100
120 140 160
160
Station (h)
Station 00
test
- culvert
Plan: Post Dev Plan 211512015
test - culvert
Plan: Post Dev Plan
2/15/2015
Section 0 +90
08
.03 0 .06
.06
x.035 +-.os
288
Legend
284
3
L -.. .
to
!
1 i
EG 100 YR
},
, -i- - -} -
1 I �....l.
_•..
YR
EG 100 YR
WS
I
�
WS 100 YR
t
EG 10 YR
262
EG 10 YR
WS 10 YR
_
"' �
ws 10 YR
100
j
Crk YA
-
Ground
:�
_ ;... . ; -� i
01Cti O YR—
Bank Sta
- + - -
Ground
280
j
i ?+
Bank Sta
280
y
279
W
279
w
276
276-
274-
274-
272
272
100
120
140 160 190 200 220
loo
120
140 160 190 zoo 220
Station (h)
Station Ih)
Notice that the 10 -yr storm is passed by the culvert and although the 100 -yr storm does flow over the
driveway that is acceptable.

teet-atlrea Plan: Post Dev Plan 2/152015 test -movart Plan* Poet Dev Plan 2'152015
Section 0.50 Section 0.0 Oow Wmm Prop" lne
.035 OS — r 00 03S .08
281 281 nd
EG 100 YA E4100 YR
ws 100 YA ws 100 YR
262 EG 10 YR M. EG 10 YR
/ ws 10 YR ws to YA
c�elaa
Olt 1001 A
2W t s. CA 10 YR j 2w 6ro�rd
6erck Su
F
276 27
I
27 �Ti ?76
t
27, 271
41 H
}
272 27
100 120 140 1a0 too 200 220 210 100 120 140 100 1810 200
Station (hi Stara+(it)

The water surface profiles for the post construction condition are as follows:
NFC-RAS Plan P-t r) -I.-I River Channel Reach Raarh 7
Reach
River Sta
Profile
0 Total
Min Ch El
W.S. Elev
Grit W.S.
E.G. Bev
E.G. Slope
Val Chrd
FlowAraa
Tap Width
Freda! Qd
i
(CIS)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(fvs)
(ag ft)
(ft)
Reach 1
243
10 YR
204.00
277.30
279.34
279.28
280.07
0.013453
6.98
31.38
20.78
0.93
Reach 1
243
100 YR
520.00
277.30
280.67
280.67
281.96
0.012376
9.46
63.53
27.69
0.97
!77!!
a0•lr1.. i
77
Reach 1
200
10 YR
204.00
276.00
27910
279.64
0.004538
4.66
43.95
21.33
0.54
Reach 1
200
100 YR
1 520.00
276.00
280.75
281.44
0,005465
679
87.37
39.57
0.64
Reach 1
150
10 YR
204.00
274.50
279.30
279.47
0.001514
3.35
69.62
34.06
0.33
Reach 1
150
100 YR
520.00
274.50
280.81
281.18
0.002239
5.25
130.76
47.40
0.42
Reach 1
140
10 YR
204.00
274.001
279.36
279.43
0.000468
2.36
115.05
47.28
0.19
Reach 1
140
100 YR
520.00
274.00
280.92
281.11
0.000677
3.90
196.97
58.16
0.27
Reach 1
120
10 YR
204.00
27150
279.37
275.74
279.42
0.000230
1.95
164.28
54.87
0.15
Reach 1
120
100 YR
520.00
273.50
280.96
277.29
281.08
0.000487
335
263.69
67.47
0.22
Reach 1
114
Culvert
Reach 1
90
10 YR
204.00
272.83
276.75
276.81
0.000713
2.01
101.47
41.82
0.23
Reach 1
90
100 YR
520.00
272.83
277.77
277.96
0.001866
3.51
148.31
50.10
0.36
Reach 1
50
10 YR
204.00
272.50
276.89
276.78
0.000724
2.33
89.05
32.90
0.23
Reach 1
50
100 YR
520.00
272.50
277.55
277.87
0.002080
4.56
120.99
42.47
0.41
Reach 1
0
ioYR
204.00
272.10
278.70
273.89
276.74
0.000365
i.6t
t26 -76
44.11
0.17
Reach 1
0
100 YR
520.00
272.10
277.60
275.07
277.75
0.001038
3.08
189.36
50.55
0.29
The installed arch culvert does handle and pass the 10 -yr storm event.
With regard to the 100 -yr storm event, the "pre- post" water level convergence occurs at the +/-
2+38 point of the study reach. The 100 -yr flood will reach into the upstream property by 38 linear
feet and the convergence is just prior to the upstream culvert. The width and length of
encroachment is shown on the following exhibit.
The base flood elevation is therefore 280.67 and consequently a new RFPE of 282.67. A new
survey plat will be prepared for City of Raleigh review indicating the proposed flood storage
easement and the RFPE.
100 -yr backwater due to the existing arch culvert.
I'pl
Nr at IS Iri
Ma-
i
I' sow
>Ima r
-�i7a
7
131hL
I
f
l =0
100
i /u.
/ Mn
'
!77!!
a0•lr1.. i
77

As shown in the following preliminary grading plan we point out that the driveway installation
can be completed without a bypass flow area located in the Neuse Riparian Buffers and with a
minimum of disturbance. Jennifer Burdette with NCDWQ advises if there is less than 0.1 acres of
disturbance, and less than 150 LF, a nationwide permit is not required.
This disturbance per zone is:
ZONE AREA SF
SF
s
Zone 1 and 2 are a combined 0.062 acres and the culvert length with headwall is only 31 LF.
Driveway grading plan:
This plan will require that the existing driveway elevation be lowered to allow sufficient overflow of the
100 -yr storm event. It is our opinion that this can be done and is not an issue.
SUMMARY:
The result of our study indicates that the 100 -yr storm cannot be contained upon the relevant
property. With this in mind we recommend the property owner seek an easement for the probable
backwater encroachment as shown and indicated above and more accurately described as the 280.67
contour. This should satisfy the City of Raleigh requirements.

USACE
Preliminary JD Form
& Data Forms

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
S &EC, PA - Bob Zarzecki, 8412 Falls of Neuse Rd, Ste 104, Raleigh, NC 27615
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 4117
Balsam Drive
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State NC County /parish /borough Wake City Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 84080
N, Long -078 71100 W
Universal Transverse Mercator NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody Crabtree Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
Non - wetland waters 147 linear feet 9 width (ft) and /or 0 03 acres
Cowardin Class Riverine
Stream Flow Perennial
Wetlands 0 acres
Cowardin Class
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters
Tidal
Non -Tidal
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date
❑ Field Determination Date(s)
1 The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time

2 In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
Jurisdictional waters, (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions, (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization, (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary, (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable, (6) accepting a permit authorization (e g , signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are Jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such Jurisdiction in any administrative or Judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court, and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
,permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C F R Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, Jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C F R 331 5(a)(2)) If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA Jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of Jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable
This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant complete PCN application
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant

❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters' study
❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
Z U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 1 24000 / 2013
Raleigh West, NC
Z USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey
Citation Wake Co Soil Survey (Sheet 38)
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s)
Z FEMA/FIRM maps DFIRM
Z 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is 280' base flood elevation per attached
flood certification (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Z Photographs Z Aerial (Name & Date) 2013
or Z Other (Name & Date) site photos 2/19/2015
❑ Previous determination (s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Other information (please specify)
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
V Digitally signed by Bob Zarzecki
V DN cn =Bob Zarzecki o =S &EC PA
Bob Zarzecki�ou =Wetlands Department
email =bzarzeckt @sandeccom c =US
Date 2015 03 20 15 49 16 04 00'
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Site
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
Estimated amount of aquatic
Class of aquatic
No.
resource in review areas
resource
(If or acres)
1
Non - section 10
358408
-0787110
R3
147 If
- wetland

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address
City, State
County
Directions:
4117 Balsam Dnve
Raleigh, NC
Wake
From Wake Forest take Roger Rd west to USIA south to Falk of Weise Rd south to 540 West to NC50 south
to Edwards Mill Rd Ext south to Laurel Hills Rd west to Boxwood Rd West to Balsam Dr north
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN) 0786516122
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address':
SBEC, PA - Bob Zarzeckt
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615
(919F846-5900— - - -- - -- - - - ^ -- -
bzarzeckl @sandec com
Select one
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Woodybulll, LLC - Johnny Woody
6431 Bandford Way, Suite 7
Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number: (919) 841 -4884
Electronic Mail Address 3: fohnny@woodybudtcom
❑✓ Proof of Ownership Attached (e g a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel /Tax Record data)
1 If available
z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version. December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein.
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U S Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described foi the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the (J.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Woodybullt, LLC (agent S &EC)
Property Owner (please print)
Bob Zarzecki
March 23, 2015
Date
Digitally aigned by Bob Zeaed%l
DN cn =Bob Zarzocki o =SSEC PA ou= wetlands Department
ema0= bz9rzeokQsatxW com G=US
Date 2015 03 23 08 22 03 04 00
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
7✓ 1 am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation
❑ 1 am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation
❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property /project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS' and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
F] I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E
5 Waters of the United States
Version- December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
7 Map of Property or Project Area (attached) This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
W✓ Size of Property or Project Area 0 705 acres
rV-71 I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests
0 Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Project Coordinates: 35 8408 Latitude -078 X110 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
✓❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum streets, intersections, towns
VAerial Photography of the project area
W1 USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e g National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form From Regulatory Guidance Letter No 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Version. December 2013 Page 5

jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
rributaries.
✓❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
✓❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
✓❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic,resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ l.ocattons of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JI)s including Verification of a Delineation.
Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Laige and small scale maps that depict, at minimum. streets. intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soi I Survey Map
IF Othet Maps, as appropriate (e.g National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at
http / /www usace army md/ Missions /CivilWorks /ReaulatoryProsram and Perm its /res sups aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at
hup-//portal ncdenr ors /c /document library/get file?uuld= 76f3c58b -dab8- 4960- ba43- 45b7faf06f4c &eroupld =38364 and,
http / /www saw usace army mil/ Portals/ 59 /docs /resulatory /publicnotices /2013 /NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318 Pdf
6 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type
Version: December 2013 Page 6

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name W O°a,4 h -*, 4
2. Evaluator's name: S a Ic L - 9 . Zar leek %.
3. Date of evaluation • 2 - 19 - 15 4. Time of evaluation: % b : SO
5. Name of stream• UT to Cr at, 4t ee Creel:, 6. River basin 14ev5e G 3C Z O ZO 1
7. Approximate drainage area
9. Length of reach evaluated
221. S 3 aLe -ei
14*� Ce,Ar
8. Stream order.
3 rt
10 County WC -1cG.
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decunal degrees 12. Subdivision name (if any). L.&vr e-1 Iti i1> WebT
Latitude (m 34 872312) 3S. SWO S Longitude (ex -77 556611)
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet rtho (Aenal) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mn r " ifid "attach map identifying stream(s) location).
411'4 SoAsa,M Dr:yc. , RatvNO, , W e 2+(o1?.
14. Proposed channel work (if any), d elva way C ms ! o ­, Vito, g th e u I"t.+ S41 "W ie @ 1 "W
15. Recent weather conditions- twrrA41 rc1f,-ro,ll 46- prey,* -1 •AOAN. -, i'/- \Vaboue PW-d p►�eti�.rS (O MO�►ir1
16. Site conditions at time of visit SAow av` arov^4 -fro­ a So..e1G J%4y%, r r; oe
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters x Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
3 P&AA $ totLk 0�
18. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation pomt9 YES NO if yes, estimate the water surface area:_ 4.5 uxre l
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (a NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? G NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: dE% Residential (3 % Commercial %o Industrial __°yo Agricultural
Forested % Cleared / Logged %o Other ( )
22. Bankfull width. F F" T• 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 1 Fit '
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentl (2 to 400 _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (> 10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determming the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc Every characteristic must be scored usmg the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g , the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse): (X Comments: ��rer ►e S Gwv.A i„ri�'h �r.l�oa (e�i
Gnbbie t �w�11 o�1de� �S4e.o � �o� �e1le .
Evaluator's Signature' Date Z - Lo - /57 This channel evaluation form`t be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26

Stream Quality Assessment
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site H11-4 City /County R4 kei -JI \40k a sampling Date 2 - 191
Applicant/Owner \ti(sao a y `"� )+ �� State N C- Sampling Point U p It 1
Investigator(s) 5 it E C. - Q . Zar tack. Section, Township, Range
Landrorrn (hdisiope, terrace, etc) �` �1 �10 Pc Local relief (concave, convex, none) W e Slope ( %) 10 70
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) N��` �3(o Lai IS. 8W 1% Long -C -48 • -4k \i Datum t3P083
Sod Map Unit Name NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ° , Sod N° , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation N0 , Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes o ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required.
check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ `Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Wider Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_y Dry- SeasomWater Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C8)
-- Crayfish Burrows (C3)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
— Algal Mat or Crust (84)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aqultard (133)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Melt! ®las"tions
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches) 1�
Water Table Present? Yes
✓_ Depth (inches) 0
Saturation Present? Yes
`� Depth (inches) 9f
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point V P �`-4
30 r6d'''S
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet'
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
.o er �
C
Soecies?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
l
1 F;k!hw S r a A Z;4'h 1t r.�
(Ob
YeS
F W- V
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2 Qcer rAry&%
ZO
`(el
FAC
Total 5
yw2 . r i �: ttAh
3 S Pe v5 � � 5
to
(,(o
<=A{ ti
es Across s All Strata
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Species
Z07a
5
ThaPercent re OBL, FACW, r FAC (AIB)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet.
Total % Cover of. Multiply by.
8
$O' r�2 y - mQ 0 = Total Cover 45/19
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 1
to %4es, . F -'—U1
2 pc« fvbf • �X t0 `{e1 FNL
3
4
8
7
8
9
10
ZO = Total Cover '0/14
Herb um (Plotsize 30 rcc "'v3 )
1 POk4Sh01 w► Acro56'Qho:bel 30 Yes
2
3
4
6 --
8
9
10
11
12
FKL U
� __30 =total cover IS /�
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 3a ' �J ;W; )
1
2
4
5
6
= Total Cover
Retnad,s eik tuds photo numbers here or on a separate stteel ) _-
US Army Corps of Engineers
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 v
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or or a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In (7 6 cm) or
more to diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
helgM
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1
m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 It tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes ©o
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

1
SOIL Sampling Point up 1' ~ Z
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tyoe' Lo(? Texture Remarks
O -S -4.5 `tit 14 loo 16#24 kocwH
S_ II Z 2,S -nQ S/8 tao a1�
'TVDe C= Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grams 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (87)
2 cm Muck (All 0) (MLRA 14T)
_ Hisbc Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
h_
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ , Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (All 0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (iF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox'Depressrons (F8)
_ Sandy Murry Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
— Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type ✓
Depth (inches) Hydric Boll Present? Yes ©o
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont –Version 2 0

MAP
w
.o.41 z-
jr
FP
ai
Ilk-
21
St
ma. T

Impact Exhibits

�r
a
(�
H
r c�
�6
s
c
f
J r N
�U M
y
V
T �
m
~_ V
Y1 �
LLl
V
^� C
C
au
:fl
s
x
w
a1
V_

■ \C .i ,r, aa. -_` 71,7, ,= ' - T�� .. - -•� 5,�r .�\ ._:= 1�.. may= ± ,�ij ±,ti `'t44r V7" 1 �;�l. r1/'� \ r, \, \ \ <==� t� :.I III -� Ate. I •S ►�� r /1/ •Lr.. - ,, a 7 *�!`` - _ 1is tl�1 �� �r ^• ti�� • t ~ �' No/
Orm .,, / ' ` ,^ n'
••1 ��w� =� ` - 1' (' �'' /� t � r � �'" J %����..� � � Ali I A, ''I ;� ♦ -Yi \` ��
(� •� \ � - ��1 - ,' ,.r �ir.:I/ n'.nnnnr�i��t �` rr- 1�i��t � ��.111;� � � \t � �'1 � \���h"'�
MR
if �,rr,rs� ��1.• !1 %�Nitl!�'�.' `��Y ;'rr� rI� l.��� ice•
1'. t r = ✓i• I r..:��. �` }�aa,� :.• +J�11 _ i Y r� ',..�M17�: r' t ft�U�lf4•l ��►
+1i�:, / ir. i. 1�►s .� :\ y�;� ►�`* ``►r'1:L°. ►� Mo�'l`�
(' { f ,y• , ril`Il/ •t }rj.� `�� - .�i- - - ' 1J��1'I .�J♦ �. �4�i5r.a •l�tsr JN //
wllt
�, ` • I }f � � II } � �i1 � �!� �� � ,• � 1• ~ _ �� ��� w r�,, .,. : � IjI � fjl���,l ,r►r � ,p�v. , +��
.1 . _ { 1� r i � r A r 'Ij•% F S i Fit l •E � ��
�
i!�
_T^�c�'
-� �,, r S •f f al i���r ��.4 . -. •.rte Jr ��_ ,j I
•�� . r .� 1{.••.. '.�`.i,ftri . +t! '4 ri�nC i. �•� +,1,��r+ r . � •r- i� � �L�' • • � -� . �fJ�� h ' ti f�I�� JT�r e'�S �f.. � \�� .aIti �� ' . �, � �� �-,l�� 1/�l� S r� ''.f .'�J, ��I 1 • .7,l� � r TtR>��.....�� .a R%�� y«� � . � ' ' T - . - '���`� �* �t :�� rli ;J,_i 'Sr „T � . �L .�r f r �I a NJ .��'��� . �
\►.y�.a”` 4�—
` l %.iLq Op, �r� M � y♦`��il:'f'til� 11 \ � � � J ' ► �4 P� ti�. r •..j • Lr( , � ` !�i lrw� , � r
i
♦1��- z;,y � � � „l� 'S �+ , }171:��P� `�At�,•./1�r,�� t(h!1�tri�� ��'- •R��
.�t. ��,�5 � r ��A `��1fi ✓ %`'�h�i.v��i�r.'v: ♦ -• �'•' �i'7 >• 1 t Irf� �1i �{ I t rr � � �� �1
rI[ci��l.,l,l,ur .:Y T �M 1�r i ,'♦' �f 1,;�t 1� i'
t�t; a: f1 '�.rrw'tt•; ' .i� =J•,■ I ` .�
Mori
-'�PO
t� .r r�� y _��1,,Q;�,� �/
,•Jt�}���� � �� •ttf +Ir�'r ''.� .%'1�����r� 1 �� ;..•iw alt/ii1 /i4 i �� ..��� �/i'•� ,� /' � -�' ``� ♦ r /t{1��,.'
I 1#,A
•i =�► 'r.5 I�r� ♦ "i 1 r� i �� ,. ♦ l'i'- Jr
.� •.�. _ �1[ rte.. � -M� � I�t»t„ ♦ ���.��f � � y •1".` !
� �_ - � -� - r- • • �r f'"'�'�'�� •^ \ � i�\ � � r 1>. ►�`.♦ +r! +iI � I 1� j'�"� \���. � \i � r 1 r�
�` 4 " r r • ter/ . `� � •�•'J r ' �` �C ' 7 ♦, � %h I jl, f t, �\ � 1`� � �� ' � 1+�
~` �� _ '” j �r►i. r��i �i•" v � � ' �.�y. t �` t. ` h f ��\Z♦�I�i �t, 1 /�� � .�. 5 t�l!( �,Y.
t
i
U r, try ♦ .1, ` 9t"•
;�I ,�; = � •'^ - ,. �+ � `�:/ 5 a'• � r � ii,
ti sl!'r' ��/! ' • �,- J r7��1, �!�' I+ ^ ' \ ��t��1��a�i °'t. wc' ���`. t ff1 ��;.#
�' ��«� `Z`� \ t. ',i��� ♦ 'Ll'`. / - -'a, J����I)t her :i �r G•1�1 �`r - +""'
�. i. 1' .,y �6V a � .lam. 1N,. b' � � • \ <1`�.. r • 'y1- _
�t,si±�� l��-��lZ� j' ,` write t���� i'�r, j .I / iJ ♦ �, ! *
* �.:� {*
r f 1 ` (J(� • Vat r l 1 ir� vi
t'r i ♦ T �./ �, 1•�E •.�' +.Z- or ys+f1� t1 \� "� J v�
�s
RN ��� �{t{�� ± �!'r� 1�of 1 � %� ' 11' `�r,5 rfi�'Ir ti \�' �1t1.� „1' 1 alp �... , �♦ .: Y.! S, �-:.. i %„ •i 1 y.,..L �'�* .`•<•t 4 1 ra \. ,`� j r,,
!f 1. :.I � , ,�_ N . � _ „ , __ �i r:�t• %� � �y. r�.�L ���� ��4. ,? t�' . R. •• �i tr � r. /���'.
' i i �`- ' �� �'rr�f �•� ^Ir..I ti t , i. i � 1,'+,�-iV,, ` � •.• ,r��, t
'et
WONON

i
CU
GRAPHIC 9CAIE
larstl
I YAK �M1
S�I
I
i
• , -
F
YC�
R J$ a
a
! n
� V H
y
�u
m
— A
V
ii.
i.r
Q
a.+
.�i
W
rr.�.'
Q
N

��Z r
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 I•.f b R
-�i
N >
N >
.v it
E�
•vs
V N
F
y � N
V
�z
N -V
O
x
w
c
a�
U
ca
O
U
G
w
r

I �
cl
Bx W70 F mv-4- ►1
siwrwtr s E�wEwT
It
RUCKS
kel � � 11
Nv�• 272.83
ON I
T
i
i
N2r 49' 3'�lva
) � 8
1 N �2' 09.22"E
7'.96-
,
1
I
�pns-n4 I i
RETA]MG 4
WALL
i
i
100 YEAR
BACKWATER ea w .w
2n.w
6pi'1NV.:
2n.OW
v
2
I
OG S W H
R kt 1285.02'
IN: 24.92'
OUT: 1 274.42'
I IMPACTED AREAS
S.
,I�III/I1111 \II \ \,�,,
GRAPMC SCE 13
(01sT)
1 t..a . 00 ti

�I
GRAPINc scua
(D PM)
/LA -M R
IP If
Al
aA
�u
N
a�
0
a
.0
I ■
■N■E��wrsm�7��
■I
IMEMEN
LINKRIMMINFAMMEMI
IMMEEMEN-MOVA.MMEMEMMI
Wool
Imp
GRAPINc scua
(D PM)
/LA -M R
IP If
Al
aA
�u
N
a�
0
a
.0