20181733 Ver 2_B-4926 IP Application FINAL 02-23-2023_Fully Executed_20230314

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
February 22, 2023
J. ERIC BOYETTE
SECRETARY
Thomas Steffens Garcy Ward
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Washington Regulatory Field Office Washington Regional Office
2407 West 51h Street 943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889 Washington, NC 27889
SUBJECT: Application for Section 404 Individual Permit, Section 9 Permit,
Section 401 Individual Water Quality Certification and Buffer
Authorization for the replacement of Bridges 920 and 934 over the Neuse
River in Lenoir County
TIP No. B-4926, WBS: 40163.3.1
Dear Mr. Steffens and Mr. Ward,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 2 proposes to
replace Bridges 929 and 934 on NC Highway 55 over the Neuse River near the City of
Kinston in Lenoir County, North Carolina.
The purpose of this letter is to request approval for a Section 404 Individual Permit,
Section 9 Permit, Section 401 Individual Water Quality Certification and Riparian Buffer
Authorization. In addition to this cover letter, the following has been included to assist
your review:
• Appendix A
- ENG Form 4345
• Appendix B
- Permit Drawings and Conservation Easement Impact Drawings
• Appendix C
- Utility Drawings
• Appendix D
- Roadway Plans (includes SCMs)
• Appendix E -
N.C. Division of Mitigation Services Acceptance Letter
• Appendix F
— NC SEPA Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist (MCDC)
• Appendix G
— Aquatic Programmatic Biological Opinion: Email Approval
• Appendix H
— U.S. Coast Guard Advanced Approval Exemption
• Appendix I —
Historical Architecture and Archaeological No Survey Forms
• Appendix J —
FEMA Coordination and MOA Approval
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504

PURPOSE AND NEED
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace Bridges 920 and 934 on NC 55 over the
Neuse River near the City of Kinston, in Lenoir County, North Carolina. The existing
bridges were both constructed in 1937 and are functionally obsolete. Furthermore, the
road is currently classified as an arterial road and the Comprehensive Transportation Plan
(CTP)/Thoroughfare Plan Designation or Facility Type is "Other Major Thoroughfare —
Existing." As such, this road is intended to deliver traffic from collector roads to
freeways or expressways or between urban centers at the highest level of service as
possible. Although there is no notable recent growth or development evident in the
Direct Community Impact Area (DCIA) or surrounding area, and there is no planned or
approved development that would affect traffic within the Study Area, replacement of the
bridges is necessary to allow continued use of the roadway by motorists, pedestrians, and
cyclists. NC 55 is designated as Bicycle Route 40 (Lenoir County Loop Route). As there
are currently no sidewalks or bicycle lanes within the Study Area, the project will also
improve safety for both motorists and cyclists, as the new design includes 4' offsets to be
used as bicycle lanes with bicycle -safe railings. No bicycle lanes/facilities will be
constructed as part of this project.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Because of traffic volumes and potential detour requirements, the proposed replacement
bridges will be located slightly south of the existing structures, oriented east -west,
roughly perpendicular to the Neuse River. Following completion of the proposed bridge
replacements, the existing bridge structures will be removed, and the existing concrete
pilings will be removed. The total area of the proposed bridges over the Neuse River is
approximately 9,450 square feet. The bridge structures will be constructed of concrete.
Bridge 920 over the Neuse will measure 35 feet wide and 540 feet in length (end to end).
Bridge 934 over the overflow will measure 36 feet wide and 215 feet in length (end to
end). The low steel (lowest point of the bridge) of the proposed bridges will be
approximately 35 feet above the normal water surface elevation of the Neuse River and
overflow, which matches the navigational clearance of the existing bridge structures.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Currently, B-4926 is scheduled to LET September 23, 2023.
INDEPENDENT UTILITY
The B-4926 bridge replacement is the only part of B-4926 currently funded for
construction. This project exhibits the following characteristics of independent utility of a
proj ect:
1) The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address
environmental matters on a broad scope.
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION KINSTON, NC 28504
KINSTON, NC 28504 Website: www.ncdot.gov

2) The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional
transportation improvements are made in the area;
3) The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably
foreseeable transportation improvements.
SEPA DOCUMENT STATUS
The proposed project qualifies as a Non -Major Action under the Minimum Criteria rules
and a Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist was completed to satisfy the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation requirements.
ALTERNATIVES ANALAYSIS SUMMARY
Four alternatives were evaluated for the bridge replacements.
• No -build alternative
• Alternative I - Replace bridges in current location
• Alternative 2 - New alignment to the south
• Alternative 3 — New alignment to the north
Discussion of each alternative is presented below.
No Action Alternative
This alternative consists of not constructing the project. This alternative would not
impact any waters of the U.S., or waters of the State. However, there would be
significant impact to the community and safety concerns when the bridges fail. NC
Highway 55 is a major corridor across the Neuse River and no other alternative exists
that meets the project purpose and need or avoids the need for a federal action. Therefore,
this alternative does not achieve the purpose and need for the project.
Alternative I
Alternative 1 consists of replacing the bridges and conducting roadway improvements on
the current alignment while utilizing an off -site detour. This alternative would minimize
impacts to waters of the U.S. and waters of the State. Impacts are estimated to be 0.25-
acre. However, the off -site detour would be approximately 16 miles, cross several
railroad tracks, and run through downtown Kinston. With the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in -
water construction moratoria for the Neuse River (February 15 — September 30), it is
anticipated that construction would take 2-3 years to complete. The distance of the
detour and duration of construction would result in significant traffic delays and
unacceptable adverse impacts to EMS access, school bus operations, and bicycle use.
Keeping the roadway opened and phasing the construction was also investigated. The
impacts to waters of the U.S. and waters of the State would be similar to the off -site
detour alternative (0.25 acre). However, the construction period with phasing and lane
closures is estimated to be 4-5 years because of the in -water construction moratoria. On -
site traffic would also be impacted by temporary road and lane closures over the
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION KINSTON, NC 28504
KINSTON, NC 28504 Website: www.ncdot.gov

construction period. While achieving the project purpose and need, the traffic and access
impacts for the duration of construction would be significant for Alternative 1.
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)
Alternative 2 consists of constructing the bridges and causeway on a new alignment
slightly to the south. Alternative 2 will impact more wetlands than Alternative 1 (1.5
acres vs. 0.25 acre). However, the existing roadway and bridges would remain open
during construction with only minor traffic delays. Alternative 2 will also result in a
shorter construction period while still complying with the in -water construction
moratoria. The new alignment will also increase the bridge approach radius of curvature,
improving traffic safety. To offset wetland impacts, the existing roadway fill will be
removed, restoring approximately 1.0 acre of wetlands on -site. Utility lines will be
relocated to the south of the new road alignment to avoid the wetland restoration areas.
The existing bridges and bridge piles will be removed.
Alternative 3
Alternative 3 consists of constructing the bridges and causeways on a new alignment to
the north. This alternative would reduce traffic impacts by eliminating the off -site detour
as Alternative 1. However, the bridge approach radius of curvature will be decreased,
negatively impacting traffic safety. A northern alignment would also impact property
owner access to the northwest parcel requiring the construction of a new driveway.
Alternative 3 would impact approximately 2.5 acres of water of the U.S. and waters of
the State.
RESOURCE STATUS
Water Quality Classification
The B-4926 project is located entirely in the Neuse River Basin [U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020202].
There are no Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), WS-I,
or WS-II waters within 3 miles upstream or downstream of the project study corridors or
within the project study area. No stream that flows through the project study corridors is
designated as National Wild and Scenic River or State Natural and Scenic River.
Jurisdictional Determination
Waters of the U.S. identified within the project study area include 500 linear feet of
jurisdictional stream (mainstem of Neuse River) and 18.30 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands.
Wetland and stream delineations were performed in March 2015. The United States
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION KINSTON, NC 28504
KINSTON, NC 28504 Website: www.ncdot.gov

(NCDWR) field verified the wetlands in January 2018. Jurisdictional areas were re -
verified in April 2018 with no changes.
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features
to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation
of all remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance measures were taken
during the planning and NEPA compliance stages, and minimization measures were
incorporated as part of the project design.
Proposed permanent impacts to jurisdictional areas total 4.2 acres of permanent wetland
impacts and 129 linear feet of permanent stream impacts from the Preferred Alternative.
Table 1 and 2 summarize the wetland and stream impacts resulting from the Preferred
Alternative.
Riparian buffer impacts for the Preferred Alternative include 14,933 square feet in Zone 1
and 9,963 square feet in Zone 2. The impacts are "Allowable Upon Authorization" and
no buffer mitigation is proposed.
IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL RESOURCES
Tables 1, 2 and 3 summarize the proposed impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, streams and
riparian buffers, respectively. Site numbers correspond with the permit (hydraulic)
drawings included with this application.
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504

Table 1. B-4926 Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Streams
Permanent
Existing
Existing
Site/Sheet
SW Impacts
Temp. SW
Channel
Channel
Impact Type
No.
(ac)
Impacts (ac)
Impacts
Impacts Temp.
Permanent (ft)
(ft)
1
0.07
0
239*
0
Roadway Construction
Channel
2
0
0
0
0
Excavation/Easement
Clearing
3
0
0
0
0
Roadway
Fill/Easement Clearing
4
0
0
0
0
Roadway
Fill/Easement Clearing
5
0
0
0
0
Roadway
Cut/Easement Clearing
Temp. Work Bridge
6a
0
0
0
0
Const./Roadway
Fill/Bridge
Construction
Temp. Work Bridge
6b
0
0
0
0
Const./Roadway
Fill/Bridge
Construction
7
0
0.06
0
0
Existing Bridge Bent
Removal
7
0
0.23
0
159
Temporary Bridge
Bent
7
0.04
0
129
0
Proposed Bridge Bent
0
0
0
0
Roadway Fill/Clearing
8
in Easement
Clearing in
0
0
0
0
Easement/EC
9
Devices/Roadway Cut
0
0
0
0
Bridge Construction/
10a
Embankment
0
0
0
0
Clearing in
10b
Easement/EC Devices
0
0
0
0
Roadway Fill/Clearing
11
in Easement
TOTALS
0.11
0.29
368
159
*Site I Impacts are Permanent Non-Mitigable.
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504

Table 2. B-4926 Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Wetlands
Site/Sheet
No.
Permanent
Fill in
Wetlands
(ac)
Temporary
Fill in
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing in
Wetlands (ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0.01
0.01
0
3
0.08
0
0
0.06
0
4
0.18
0
0
0.04
0
5
0
0
0.01
0.17
0
6a
0.03
0
0
0.26
0
6b
0
0
0
0.19
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
8
0.72
0
0
0.15
0
9
0
0
0.1
0.33
0
10a
0.12
0
0.01
0.8
0
10b
0.03
0
0.02
0.34
0
11
0.4
0
0
0.14
0
Totals
1.56
0
0.15
2.5
0
Table 3. B-4926 Proposed Impacts to Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffers
Site/Sheet
Allowable
Allowable
MitigableZone 1
one(SF
Mitigable
Impact Type
No.
Zone 1 (SF)
Zone 2 (SF)
Zone 2 (SF)
Proposed
1
14,933
9,963
0
0
Bridge/Removal
of Existing
Bridge
Totals
14,933
9,963
0
0
SUMMARY OF MITIGATION
Compensatory mitigation is proposed for permanent impacts to wetlands and streams
resulting from the project. As noted above, the project would result in 4.2 acres of
permanent wetland impacts and 129 linear feet of permanent stream impacts.
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION KINSTON, NC 28504
KINSTON, NC 28504 Website: www.ncdot.gov

A 2:1 ratio is assumed for permanent impacts, therefore, NCDOT will obtain
compensatory mitigation for 8.4 acres of wetland mitigation credits and 258 linear feet of
stream mitigation credits from the N.C. Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) to
compensate for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. resulting from
the proposed project. The NCDWR mitigation requirements for permanent stream and
wetland impacts will be met under the USACE mitigation requirements.
Additionally, the design will impact a portion of a wetland preservation conservation
easement currently held by Restoration Systems, LLC and part of the NCDMS Sleepy
Creek Wetland and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site. The 120-acre conservation easement
is located in the southeast portion of the project and is identified as Parcel
455600038731. The NCDOT will compensate NCDMS for the loss of mitigation credits
resulting from the project. Conservation easement impact maps are included in the permit
drawings.
A total of 1.6 acres of impact to the conservation easement is anticipated for this project.
Based on discussions between the NC Interagency Review Team (NCIRT) and NCDOT,
it was determined that NCDOT will compensate NCDMS for 0.32 acres of compensatory
mitigation for impacts to the conservation easement.
Buffer impacts for the proposed project include 14,933 square feet in Zone 1 and 9,963
square feet in Zone 2. The impacts are "Allowable Upon Authorization" and no buffer
mitigation is proposed.
Therefore, the total compensatory mitigation for the project is 8.72 acres of wetland
credits and 258 linear feet of stream credit.
FEDERALLYPROTECTED SPECIES
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information Planning and Consultation
(IPaC) database lists two federally protected species for the project study area (accessed
11/15/2022) including the Carolina madtom (Noturus furiousus) and the Neuse River
Waterdog (Necturus lewisi).
Neuse River Waterdog (NRWD) trapping surveys were conducted March 25 — 29, 2019.
No NRWD were found during the trapping survey efforts. A biological conclusion of
May Affect -Not likely to Adversely Affect was rendered for the species.
To account for potential impacts to these species and their habitat, NCDOT utilized the
Aquatic Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) for the Carolina madtom (CMT) and
Neuse River Waterdog (NRWD). A copy of the PBO submittal form is included in the
attachments.
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504

MORATORIA
The NCWRC has designated this portion of the Neuse River as an Inland Primary
Nursery Area and has established an in -water work moratoria between February 15 and
September 30. The NMFS has established an in -river work moratoria between February
I and June 30.
All work will be conducted outside of the established moratoria. Furthermore, the
proposed project will not alter the river characteristics or water quality classification. All
appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
The project will not impact any Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) identified by NMFS, and
NMFS has not requested further consultation regarding EFH.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORICARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES
The project was reviewed by NCDOT for potential resources. A copy of the NCDOT No
Survey Required form is included in the appendices. There are no archaeological
resources that would be affected by the proposed project.
SECTION 4(F) RESOURCES
No Section 4(f) properties are present in the project study area. Therefore, the project did
not require a determination under Section 4(f).
FEMA COMPLIANCE
The project has been approved under a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Type 1 on
October 14, 2021. A copy of the approval is provided in the appendix.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization of impacts to protected and valued resources were
incorporated throughout the design process. Alternative designs were reviewed in order
to reduce adverse impacts to protected resources, while also meeting the purpose and
need for the project. Alternative 2 was selected as the preferred alternative as it will result
in less impacts to waters of the U.S. and waters of the State than Alternative 3, allow for
an on -site detour, shorter construction timing, and is applicable under an Advanced
Approval Permit Exemption from the U.S. Coast Guard. In addition, rip -rap is shown on
the plans for the entire length, including rip -rap for toe protection and approaches (2:1
with entire slope in rip -rap). During demolition, mitigation measures will be in place to
prevent debris from the bridge from falling into the Neuse River. This may include nets
or tarps under the bridge to catch debris.
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504

Additionally, temporary work bridges will be utilized to limit impacts in surface waters
as well as wetlands during proposed bridge construction and existing bridge removal.
Temporary work bridges will be constructed top -down using steel H-piles, eliminating
the need for fill in wetlands and dewatering in surface waters. The work bridges over the
Neuse River will have a gap to allow for boat traffic. Bridge 34 deck drains have
dissipator pads below structure in wetlands.
The sections below describe more project specific efforts to avoid and minimize impacts
from the proposed project to comply with federal, state and local requirements.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
• A detailed delineation of wetland and streams was performed to ensure the
limitations of impacts to natural resources. As a result, proposed grading limits
were shifted to avoid impacts, where possible.
• All stone will be removed and disposed of off -site, or the stone can be used in
areas that require permanent stone protection after project completion.
• All construction equipment will be refueled at least 200 feet from all water bodies
and be protected with secondary containment.
• Hazardous materials, fuel, lubricating oils, or other chemicals will be stored at
least 200 feet from all water bodies (whichever distance is greater) and not in a
Water of the U.S.
• Areas used for borrow or construction by-products will not be located in
wetlands.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
• Implementation of NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters (BMPs) will minimize impacts to water resources during the
preconstruction, construction, maintenance, and repair situations.
• The proposed project will adhere to the Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds
[15A NCAC 04B .0124 (a) — (e)].
• The Contractor may perform clearing operations, but not grubbing operations
until immediately prior to beginning grading operations.
• Once grading operations begin, work shall progress in a continuous manner until
complete.
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION KINSTON, NC 28504
KINSTON, NC 28504 Website: www.ncdot.gov

• All project construction activities initiated within jurisdictional streams will be
carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of
disturbance within the jurisdictional streams.
• All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high,
non jurisdictional, stable ground.
• Erosion control devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing
operation.
• The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion
ditches, temporary coffer dams, tree protection, clearing only as necessary to
install devices.
• Seeding and mulching shall be performed on the areas disturbed by construction
immediately following final grade establishment.
• Seeding and mulching shall be done in stages on cut and fill slopes that are
greater than 20 feet in height measured along the slope, or greater than 2 acres in
area, whichever is less.
• All sedimentation and erosion control measures, throughout the project limits,
must be cleaned out when half full of sediment, to ensure proper function of the
measures.
• Any needed repairs to sedimentation and erosion control measures will be made
immediately to maintain all measures designed.
• Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back fill will be placed and
contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into
adjacent jurisdictional streams. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material
within jurisdictional streams will be strictly prohibited as part of the construction
of this project.
• All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and
operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once
every week.
• An erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's
representative.
Stormwater Control
• NCDOT will prepare a stormwater management plan (SMP) that implements
structural and non-structural post -construction stormwater BMPs to the maximum
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION KINSTON, NC 28504
KINSTON, NC 28504 Website: www.ncdot.gov

extent practical (MEP), which is consistent with the Department's National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Post -Construction Stormwater
Program.
INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Existing rules for the Water Quality Certification Program (15A NCAC 2H .0506(b)(4))
require that NCDWR determine that a project "does not result in cumulative impacts
based on past or reasonably anticipated future impacts that cause or will cause a violation
of downstream impacts, that cause or will cause a violation of downstream water quality
standards".
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace two existing bridges deemed as
functionally obsolete. There is no notable recent growth or development evident in the
surrounding area and there is no planned or approved development within the study area.
Replacement of the bridges is necessary to allow continued use of the roadway by
motorists, pedestrians and cyclists. NC 55 is designated as Bicycle Route 40 (Lenoir
County Loop Route). As there are currently no sidewalks or bicycle lanes within the
study area, the project will also improve safety for both motorists and cyclists, as the new
design includes 4' offsets to be used as bicycle lanes.
The project is not expected to have a notable indirect effect to land use or development
patterns in the area. In addition, because few indirect impacts are anticipated, the
cumulative effect of this project, when considered in context with other past, present and
future actions and the resulting impact on notable human and natural features, should also
be minimal.
REGULATORYAPPROVALS
In consultations with relevant agencies, it was noted that several permits and further
consultations are required for this project. Section 408 approval for alteration of a Civil
Works Project is required for the proposed project. A copy of the Section 408
authorization request letter is included with this application. As the Neuse River is a
navigable water, a Section 9 permit will also be required. In addition to the Section 404
Individual Permit, other required authorizations include the corresponding Section 401
Individual Water Quality Certification (WQC) and Riparian Buffer Authorization from
the NCDWR.
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504

A copy of the permit application and its distribution list will be posted at
hlt2s://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/pdea/PennApps/.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Casey Whitley at
[e-mail] or [phone]
Sincerely,
`�a7 a,/16&7
Casey Whitley, PE, PLS
NCDOT Division 2
Cc: NCDOT Permit Applications Standard Distribution List
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON, NC 28504

APPENDIX A

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB APPROVAL 003
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRURUARY RY 20 2013
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS I THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Casey Middle - Last - Whitley
First - Anna Middle - Last - Reusche
Company - NCDO'T
Company - SEPI Engineering and Construction
E-mail Address - ckwhitleyLncdot.gov
E-mail Address - areuscheCsepiinc.com
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 2815 Rouse Road Extension
Address- I Glenwood Avenue
City - Kinston State - NC Zip - 28504 Country -
City - Raleigh State - NC Zip - 27603 Country - US
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w1AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
919-816-7745
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
B-4926 Replace Bridges #20 and #34 on NC 55 over the Neuse River, Lenoir County, NC
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Neuse River
Address Highway 55
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: °N 35 �954 Longitude: -W '77 4g54
City - Kinston State- NC Zip- 28501
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID Municipality
Section - Township - Range -
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Approximately 5 miles northeast of Kinston, NC.
From Kinston approximately 2.7 miles north on NC 1 I to the intersection with NC 55. Bridge 20 is approximately 2.5 miles east of the
intersection Bridge 34 is approximately 0.2 miles east of Bridge #20.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), in accordance with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes
to replace Bridges #29 and #34 on NC Highway 55 over the Neuse River near the City of Kinston in Lenoir County. Because of traffic
volumes and potential detour requirements, the proposed replacement bridges will be located slightly south of the existing structures,
oriented east -west, roughly perpendicular to the Neuse River. Following completion of the proposed bridge replacements, the existing
bridge structures will be removed, and the existing concrete pilings will either be removed or cut flush with the river bed.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The existing bridges are functionally obsolete; both were constructed in 1937. The road is currently classified as an Arterial road and the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP)/Thoroughfare Plan Designation or Facility Type is "Other Major Thoroughfare — Existing."
As such, this road is intended to deliver traffic from collector roads to freeways or expressways or between urban centers at the highest
level of service as possible. Although there is no notable recent growth or development evident in the surrounding area, and there is no
planned or approved development that would affect traffic within the Study Area, replacement of the bridges is necessary to allow
continued use of the roadway by motorists, pedestrians and cyclists. As there are currently no sidewalks or bicycle lanes within the Study
Area, the project will also improve safety for both motorists and cyclists, as the new design includes 5' offsets to be used as bicycle lanes
with bicycle -safe railings.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED ANDIOR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
As the bridges have been deemed functionally obsolete, and would create both safety and environmental impacts if they were to fail, the
`No Build' alternative was determined to be inadequate. Due to concerns with significant delays to general traffic, EMS, school bus
operation, several rail crossings, and construction expected to take 3 years due to moratoriums, Alternative l was determined to be an
ineffective option. Alternative 2 was chosen as the preferred alternative for the project as it would allow for an on -site detour, shorter
construction timing, and exemptions from the U.S. Coast Guard as vertical clearance restriction limits were not met.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres 4.2
or
Linear Feet 368
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
See attached support document.
FNG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Lyes QNo IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody of more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- GIBSON JERRY T ETALS, 4250 JUANITA AVENUE
city- KINSTON State - NC zip - 28501
b, Address- COLE RODNEY EARL, 1906 FIWY 55 E
city - KINSTON State - NC Zip - 28501
c. Address- MANNING GEORGE M & KIM R, 2884 NEUSE ROAD
City - KINSTON State - NC Zip _ 28501
d. Address- WEST MAY B, 3128 NEUSE ROAD
City - SMYMA State - NC zip - 28579
e. Address- SCHOLER MARK T, PO BOX 327
city - AYDEN State - NC zip - 28513
26. List of Other Certificates or ApprovalslDenials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
FEMA MOA Type 1
" Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant, i
ZZ 2-3 Lt/ 2/22/2023
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNA RE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
Fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX B

F
See Sheet to For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Plan Sheet Symbols
See Sheets RW- t Thru RW-? For RW Plan Sheets
/ Tel
1
1804
55
BEGIN PROJECT : `/ 1,` f C8
W
z
z� l k/7 1;
1"N 7 1" seen st
' 804!
PROJECTS/
926
N ell
VICINITY MAP
STATE OF -flORTJI-ffil�-A-RMJE�TA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
LENOIR COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO.20 AND BRIDGE NO.34 ON NC 55
OVER THE NEUSE RIVER AND NEUSE RIVER OVERFLOW
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURES
RTATB
RrAT6 PRWIl— RMIkMM IM
R",jqr
6NR AL
N.
B-4926
I
6rATa PRQI.NA
P.A.PROI.NR.
—RIPTION
40163.1.2
WA
PE
40163.2.1
WA
R/W & UTILITIES
40163.3.1
WA
CONST.
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 35
DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SUPERELEVATION.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN
DATA
ADT 2023 =
3152
ADT 2040 =
3900
K =
9 %
D =
60 %
T =
8 %
V =
60 MPH
* TTST=3% DUAL=5%
FUNC CLASS
=
MAJOR COLLECTOR
"REGIONAL TIER"
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4926 = 0.387 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4926 = 0.143 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4926 = 0.530 MILES
Prepared In the Office of.
Relelgh NC21693
rr 94A3 Te1919.78 .99
Fax 9 e C-2 97
Engineering & Construction. Inc.
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
RANT RAMKUMAR, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
SEPTEMBER 16, 2022
DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
LETTING DATE:
SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
CASEY K. WHITLEY, PE, PLS
NCDOT CONTACT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE -
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
—1
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

On
(n
E
,or
0' SO' 100' ISO'
GRAPHIC SCALE
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 35
DENOTES FILL IN
®
W ETLAN D
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
DENOTES EXCAVATION
®
IN WETLAND
IMPACTS IN
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
®TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
POND
SEE INSET 4A
RODNEY E. COLE
MECHANIZED' CLEARING
REMOVE ALL EXISTING 'CONCRETE BRIDGE
ABUTMENT REMNANTS, EXISTING, CONCRETE
PILLARS AND- DEBRIS.
r GOR AREA SPECIAL y.
�. '�- w +" �r, T'" LATBRA 1,FTiBASE DITCH k .
LINE NCk'I' RIP -RAP - 1
,SBE �ETA12 4
REMOVE EXISTING C
fC, CONCRETE PILLA
MECHANIZED SITE' rJ
CLEARING.
7� c EXCAVATION
GR
C3 FIR
T
QOE" SHE 2
E d`
MECHA IZ CLEARING
I SFT'1BSE�CPtAI�NE (CHANGE
LICE 3/Jl LI'IPYRAP.
EEy DETAVIL
1 �
DETAIL 3
EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION P,.p.,.d
( Not to SC k)
EXCAVATE EXISTING Fill Slop.
ROADWAY EMBANKMENT
TO APPROXIMATE NATURAL
GROUND ELEVATION
CL.'IFRIP RAP
ROCK PLATING
G
W/GEOTEXTILE
2-FT THICK
GRADE AWAY FROM Natural
TOE OF FILL +F-0.5% Ground
DENOTES
EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION
QUANTITY=EST. 26,800 CY
FROM -L- STA. 17+00 TO STA. 23+25 LT
FROM -L- STA. 27+81 TO STA. 34+27 LT
FROM -L- STA. 35+92 TO STA, 40+00 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 RT
0'V
CONCRETE REMNANTS
REMOVAL SEE DETAIL 7,
RETAIN EXISTING POLES S E E
1 /
SITE 613
/`
I / PU � � � ,* RUE
18" GR—•— —
ti�— * * PE a'
s
PE Pic *q PE
3
FPEd
PIP
P* * .* * # # WT#
SITE. 4
i
SIT
y" MECI-VANIZED CLEARN 3c
3c 6''y
� � �
�
GE 2CE-1 DINT MAI411 GF-
y
�j% •Y •Y 3L 3'"
� �
fy ity •Y J6� .��f'1M
—
41 " c
_k �4 j, �"
- — * 3c
DETAIL 2
CHANNEL CHANGE
I Not to Sc le)
Propozed G.aund
N.t.U.I
d �7 p 1'iFt.
Fill Slope �• ,
�E.ist.
GEOTEXTILE B Min. D=4.0 Ft.
Max. d=FULL DEPTH
Type of Liner=EST. 555 TONS B=B4O Ft.
Class 'II' Rip Ron, b=5.0 Ft.
Geoteutile=EST. 560 SY
Ch..n.l
OF BACKSLOPE
FROM -L- STA. 16+10 TO STA. 18+43 RT
LATERAL BASE DITCH
?
Not to 5ralel b
-DRV- Fp�e �
_
�0`
d
p \ O.Sti, Slapelll
GEoiE%TILE
B Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Max. d=1.D Ft.
B=1.0 R.
Min. b=2.0 Ft.
Type of mn EST. 100 TONS CIE 'I' Rip-Rop
Geo—ile= EST.150
SY DDE = EST. I10 CY
FROM -L- STA. 21+00 TO STA. 22+50 LT
DETAIL 5
STANDARD BASE DITCH
(Norm El
oral N.tural
Graun D D,
d
Geote.tile B Min. D=1.0GrFaun
t.
MoX. d=1.0 Ft.
B=1.0 FL
pe ofLin­ EST 95 TONS CL'T R.,-Rop
r
_oteXtle= EST. 140 SY: DDE= EST. 143 CY
FROM -L- STA. 22+50 TO STA. 23+90 LT
S I Fxgl9.7 295
913e
Engineering & Constructian, Inc.
4B
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-4926 4
ILW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLE rE PLANS
DO NM USE MR /W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
H
CLEARING
MECHANIZED
SITE 711 -, \/
Y
RUE ,L� RUE RUE
/� TEMPORARY IMPACT
CONCRETE
SITE 7
TEMPORARY IMPACT A/
1
DFTAII
CONCRETE REMNANTS REMOVAL DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
EXISTING CONCRETE NATURAL GROUND
TO BE REMOVED
DENOTES
1•••••••�••••••••••���iFii"F
EXCAVATION
�•�•1��•���riii,FrF•'-
ti
FARMS, LLC
SITE 8
6
�cP,�
ti SE IN 5q
/ / O
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE HABITAT FOUNDATION
MARK T.SCHOLER
/ Z
ti
n,
PROVIDE CLASS 'II' RIP RAP ROCK PLATING ON
ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR AS INDICATED
ON THE PLANS. 2-FT THICK TO SHOULDER POINT.
REFER TO STANDARD ROCK PLATING DETAIL SHEET 2G-?
N

SO' 0' SO' 100' ISO'
GRAPHIC SCALE
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF 35
® DENOTES FILL IN
W ETLAN D
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
® 9
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
®DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
`®TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER jj r
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
POND
Gm
I
RODN E.
N
Z
O
P,
k 3R OV 1 LL E
R
ss �� T At
_k REMOVE EXIST
of
y J< CONCRETE PILI
H NI .,SITE,
'L RI Gy- v
V
:D CL�ARINtf'i
EfE BRIDGE
�� RETAIN
CONCRETE
ND DEBRIS. 9c
y
Glenwood Avenue
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
8-4926
t�
Raleigh, NC 27603
SC I
Tel:[phone]
ILW SHEET NO.
Fax :919.789."11
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
License: C-2197
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
INCOMPLE
E PLANS
DQ NM U., PaR
/W ACQUISITION
4FF INSF.1
wo
E11f
c r�Liiili'
��:7!!iI�
iar6i:>��Ile
bile:
�f
�����I
w�I�
11111111��, III 3)i
** d< fit— *#**P,**•** x
SITE 3' SITE,-
.
Cc
I \_ �I 3t d` S y zy y- T` ��-• �j
20
34
EARIN
20 I 1,11 SE I9A N HANGE
E 3IJlLI'I
DRTAIL 3cOn
TO
o DETAIL 3 DETAIL 2 DETAIL 4 DETAIL 5
GORE AREA SPECIAL STANDARD BASE DITCH
C EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION CHANNEL CHANGE INOI f° Sc°Iel D (Not to Scale) Fill 51°pa I �is) LATERALBASE DITCHUEXCAVATE EXISTING 1N°t f° Scale) -{ROADWAY XIMATE N%AL \ pN°tur°I _DRV nll0 TO APPROXIMATE NATURAL 'L'GROUND ELEVATION CL.'Il'RIP RAP °Gr°und QonROCK PLATINGPe \oinW OEOTEXTILE' J Min. D=1.0 Ff. Geote.tile g Min. D=1.0 Ft.
NatV ]-FT THICK GEoiE%TILE g Mox. d=1.N Ft.
G B=l d=1.0 Ft.
GEOTExTILE B Min. D=4.0 Ft. 6izt. Ch°�nel B=10 Ft
GRADE AWAY FROM N°tur°I Min b Ft.
E TOE OF FILL +F-0.5% Gr°end Max. d=FULL DEPTH OF BACKSLOPE Min. 6=20 Ft. Type of Liner= EST 95 TONS cL 'P RiI+-Rnp
Type of Liner=EST. 555 TONS B=B.0 Ft. Geotexfile= EST. 140 SY; DDE= EST. M3 CY
a DENOTES Class 'II' Rip Rop Type pf liner= EST. 100 TONS CIE 'I' Rip-Rop
TOTAL EXCAVATION b=5.0 Ft. Ge°fextile= EST. 150 SY DDE = EST. 110 CY RO
-0 EXCAVATION Geotexrile=EST. 560 SY
QUANTITY=EST. 26,800 CY
r FROM L-. 16+10 TO TA. +4 L- TA. +00 TO + LT
i„1Lp FRO -L- STA. 17+00 T 5 LT
F M -L- .1 1 A. 34+27 T G�
NQ , OM -L- $TA +9 0+00 LT
FROM D - . 10+00 TO $T . 12+18 IT
ROM RV STA. +00 TO ST . 12+1 RT r"
N
0
q
l
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PUE PUE RUE
TEMPORARY I PACT
SITE
IDFTAII
CONCRETE REMNANTS REMOVAL DETAILEXISTING
(NOT TO SCALE)
CONCRETE NATURAL GROUND
I
TO BE REMOVED
......
DENOTES
EXCAVATION
OOOO•,.,.r ,r,.
G
ROCK PLATING
................
AAAAAAA.
NATURAL GROUND
21 � 75 To
��O-CSTA.
iff
LY I W
d
s-
J - CONSERVAT EA
NORTH A INA WILDLIFE BIT UNDATION
M . SCHOL
n,
PROVIDE CLASS 'II' RIP RAP ROCK PLATING ON
ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR AS INDICATED
ON THE PLANS. 2—FT THICK TO SHOULDER POINT.
REFER TO STANDARD ROCK PLATING DETAIL SHEET 2G—?
2"
�a
�5l
1 /

DETAIL 3
EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION Proposed
( Not to Scale)
EXCAVATE EXISTING Fill Slope
ROADWAY EMBANKMENT
TO NATURAL
APPROXIMATE
GROUND ELEVATION CIL IT RIP RAP
ROCK PLATING
Not un9L _
W GEOTEXTILE
2-FT THICK
GRADE AWAY FROM N.1 ..I
TOE OF FILL +4-0.59 Grau nd
DENOTES
EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION
QUANTITY=EST. 26,800 CY
FROM -L- STA. 17+00 TO STA. 23+25 LT
FROM -L- STA. 27+81 TO STA. 3 4 + 2 7 LT
FROM -L- STA. 35+92 TO STA. 40+00 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 LT
FROM -0RV- STA. 10+00 TO STA, 12+18 RT
25' 01 25' 50' 75, PERMIT DRAWING
GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET 6 OF 35
SITE 613 mti��m
c
IPUP /
/ —y------------------
Tl l
iuuuuuinu� ,r
IIIII//IRRIIIIIII
IIIII%'/'/%IIII�YII _ /ir"�
//IIIII/1��11111
PUE
MECHANIZED
CLEARING
®
DENWETLOTE IN
DEN
ANILDL
®
INE WETLANDTION
DENOTES MECHANIZED
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
CLEARING
SURFACE WATER
® TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
CONCRETE
BRIDGE #20
S I Fxglg.7 295
913e
Engineering & Constructicn, Inc.
SITE 7
PUE PUE PUE
TEMPORARY IMPACT
Ims.
—S r
y i —T— —
m.
SITE7 y
TEMPORARY IMPACT
S /
a
Do
e1
m
E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B-4926
4B
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
INCOMPLE rE
PLANS
DO NM USE MR
/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

O
E
DETAIL 3
EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION Proposed
( Not to Scaie)
EXCAVATE EXISTING Fill Slope
ROADWAY EMBANKMENT
TO NATURAL
APPROXIMATE
GROUND ELEVATION CIL IT RIP RAP
ROCK PLATING
Not un9L _
W GEOTEXTILE
2—FT THICK
GRADE AWAY FROM N.1 ..I
TOE OF FILL +4-0.59 Grau nd
DENOTES
EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION
QUANTITY=EST. 26,800 CY
FROM -L- STA. 17+00 TO STA. 23+25 LT
FROM -L- STA. 27+81 TO STA. 3 4 + 2 7 LT
FROM -L- STA. 35+92 TO STA. 40+00 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 LT
FROM -0RV- STA. 10+00 TO STA, 12+18 RT
25' 01 25' 50' 75, PERMIT DRAWING
GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET 7 OF 35
®
DENWETLOTE IN
DEN
ANILDL
®
INE WETLANDTION
DENOTES MECHANIZED
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
CLEARING
SURFACE WATER
® TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
S I Fxglg.7 295
913e
Engineering & Constructicn, Inc.
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B-4926
4B
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
INCOMPLE rE
PLANS
DO NM USE MR
/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
N

!!!!!!!!!!
■■■■■■■■■■ ..........
-..■■■■■■■■
..........
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
..........
00000
0000000000000000000..
mad
0000 00000 00000 000.oe ee■000uoo e�rz�r r�a_e..[..
MH
■ENE■
0000o r.ro oo■
r:oroouoo 007
...NONE
«F�c Yi-n\!ill jMngn!!!!o
-■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1.000000000000000000
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■...............................................o 00000 onnoou�ra:rrno oo.._�.uii000■ 000io■.� _.■.u.r.:evr-nofo 0000l...............................
■M,111n, 00000 00000 000■. r�.:ea...........................................
■........................................!!!o!!!!o.!!!!!!!!0.!!l11..�-. A!!!!!!!o.!!lmommommoommomml.........no/www,ln!!o.!!!!!!!!■■mm=mp.................................
■........................................................_...._a.'.!!!o.!!!!!!!!o.!!!!!!!!o.!l........■■L1S9YY9.'i'i1J97.....................■.��!.■.Opel■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■......................................... ...w.l7......---_--...■wwE■■■■■■■■!■■■■■■■■El■■■■■■■■■■■■EEEN■mm■m■E■E■E■E111■■■■■■■■■■!■■■■■■■■■ --------- ----- .gym!.■.......
..
■l!!!!!!!7.!!!!!!!!7.l.r--...w!!!!7.!!!/■!!l7....R�=ii�..wwwwwwwlwwwwwwwwwlwwwwwwwwwl!!!!!!!!■E■E■E■E■E7wwwwwwwwwlwwwwwwwwwl!MEMO
!!!7■■■a.i��!�!.f//!!!!!7.!!!!!!!!7
■■wwwwwwwl.!!!!!..---_--...!!owwwwwwwwwl.!!!/•-i...!!!!!!o.!!!!!!l\!■.!!..■■■■r----------------____------....■■■■.!■o!!!o.!!!!!!!!f.!pia!!■.o.!!!!!!!!o
moor.wwwww■.._-.A..!!!!!!!!o.!!!!!!.!7riA//7!!0.!!!!!!!.. o.----_.�_ _ ___ _ _ ��■���■■■■rL`l.o��■Yo =m..!■■!!!!.o
■olro.-�. A!!!!!!!o.!!!!!!!!!rl��dl�lo.!!!/■■■..-� _ _ __r�■.!!l���������������!!!!!7l//.l..!!!!l........ N����!!!!!!!■■■i�ME =EM �II1d..C_.---- 70!!!!o.!!!!loiC
--.■mm■■000000lreal.■0000000I L7Z' ....x ::iiiiiiiiiiurr■■u■■NINE■■■ormmrrrrunurrr...........n.Oman 000no.ow■.:oo_,:ee1 noou00007
dii000uoolv_le:.0000 00000 ooI i ¢.r.�.■ ■.�000un /000 oolooNI n000u000n uln�loouoon nu0000uon nou000lc.: ccl noou00007
0000lwe�o:000000000000000lil.mmmmmmmwe,3�awnaaa�anwammmmmmm7mmNInmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnummmmmmmummmmmnnummmmmmmummmnnmummmmmmmw�ecc; Immmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
ovai.o /s,w000 00000 00000 ooI r�mo r.o■rrr rr■ ■■r ■rpm o00 0o / nolfo7 colon 000lxn: a.:eloo/ n ■ o000o rcrw.r uma:� a ualaea■■r:.::..c �� .coo 00000
.■■■■■■■■G a■Ew2,00 00000 0000o m■■mr 'ua .1■■ oe.m■mmliola ayu uoc,o oo.00NI oo............... mmmmmw.ww m.ww.mmm ou0000uwww■ /wwew mewmmv�.:� ■:� c 000u0000E
soo moo ■■! �.000 ■.- ■o orr o0000 ■ n000■ 000■o
.Inn noulc�000 o/ noou0000NI n■e�.lmu■mm■min
■If■■//!!!■.!!!!!!!!■.1//!!!!■7.!!!!!!!!o/■■■■.►7ONo.■o!!!.!/
nlv3 srmlr� r�'/�r_^nwnzu Ira. n!!!!�f ■■■■■■■■■NI n■■■■■00 •.!!!!.n
.!!!!!!llo..!!!!!!!o ■.l--dL.
IIII■.! INIJiI f•S JCIr:[n plll ARM■■■■!!o.!!!!!!!!oHow 9, POP FHAK
iiiiii------iiiiiiii 001 immmmiiiiim :�S=ee.e'T_rFH71 11-bWOiiiii Milmiimllu■■■r■m■■■■■....--------------------""""mmmmm=------=
momommommoomm
0000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000.rlrrarLr �0000mmoo■o; l■ oo! no■ ■oo.iiii iiiiiiiGii iiGiiiiiii ii iGiiiiio iio�ioo
!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!lou0000u0000u000nl�7oo-■0-■■0--■--■-■-■■-■:■::■:..m.00 !lll0000 00000
!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!o 00000 00000 0000• - -- - .oiull0000 00000
0000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0000o naaw�m aaa �wceemo r..�.�..ili0 00I iou■w.r r.rrr.���._._.. _. oowwww rlanrwwlo
o!!!!!!■.!!!!!!!!■.!!!!!!!!■.!!!!!!!!■.!!!!!!!!■.!!!!!!!!■.!!!!!!!!o.!!!!!!!!o.!l7w.7wl11o■rw!!!..!!!o.11llo7!!!■.!!!!!!IIlon!!!!!!!/',�?�ww.Si■YV L'lSii.IWiIJlo
m■00000.!__•.--■00000000000000000000000000000armsuu'umaimY�ooi;a .'n aoo7ollunno7noolllou000n�.siolan:mnlm:mniufo7
0000-�rc.o.o oo.c---I[ •.■■■■■■■E ■■■■■■■■■E ■■■■■■■■■E ■■■■■■■■■E ■■■■■■■■■E ■.n,nnmm� aner. ■■■■.:a �_ees ■■■■E ■n ln■L•axlcu lain■■■■I I■E II■■■■■■■Y� ■E■wn9Rw.wnl-nn.EE■
coop
coo/
.ENNE_
moommon
moommon
00000 000ralra
00000 000a'ms■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
oom■oo ran. !o.�■nr.
■■■■■■■■■■nmrL'Ja'.L'
.!!!!!!!!■n,wanneee7
0000o u.L.T.ace■
■■■■■■■■■E rwrmum■m■m
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
000��o ou000
oLc■ca.�. uo 0007
oo. moo ■coo... o■ ouoo 00000
1100110
oRn rImoml0000mmom _!■■■■u■■■■■■■■■
o/ nou0000un ns�ne Elmnr:.>r�ro
MENE■ ENEM Imoml0000mmom ■oor] a■rn000
rjm
..........aeiu .- ...ii.uiu..uii�u� i

PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 9 OF 35
TIMBER
MATTING
EXISTING III
STRUCTURE
� I
PROPOSED
STRUCTURE
TIMBER
MATTING
360'-0" ±
PROPOSED WORK BRIDGE
(12 BENTS W/ 5 HP 12X53
STEEL PILES EACH =
60 TOTAL PILES)
7
0
/0
,
I I
30'-o„
(TYPJ
-PROPOSED WORK BRIDGE_
(25 BENTS W/ 5 HP 12X53
STEEL PILES EACH =
125 TOTAL PILES)
450'-0" ±
PLAN
0
o
rn
�QT
Q7
c� TIMBER
�J MATTING
-L- //--(NG-55)
TOTAL HPX53 STEEL PILES
FOR WORK BRIDGE
FOR BRIDGE #20 = 185
❑ NC
:28 355.993]
❑ 1-Cltles. TN
423-
d23 �4fi T0401
❑ TN
Vaughn&Mellon
8fi5%54­888
Consulting Engineers
❑ Sp 5t7a4aura,SC
.4 5]4 4775
Asheville,
❑ 1--t— sc
❑ NOr th C,orollno
843 974 5650
828 253 2796
❑
■ Rale1NN, NC ❑ Uarlatt ,NC
6061248,6600y
919 9-9455 704.357 0488
0All—I., GA
710,62T 3509
ppyrlgnt p 2006 Vo . A Nelta n
AI R�ante R r
DWN. BY: WDC DATE: 3/2019
CHKD. BY: TPG DATE: 3/2019
DES. EGR. OF RECORD: PLS DATE: 3/2019
TIMBER
MATTING
PROJECT NO. B-4926
LENOIR COUNTY
STATION: 25+45000 -L-
BRIDGE '20
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RALEIGH
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
ACCESS
FOR BRIDGE OVER
NEUSE RIVER ON
NC-55 BETWEEN
SR 1810 AND SR 1804
REVISIONS SHEET NO.
NO. BY: DATE: NO. BY: DATE: S -1
G 3TOTAL
I1 N7 SHEETS
� 4 1

o.o.00
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
..0000
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
00000
■■■■■■■■■■
■rrrrrrrrr
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
non■�no
oorrYro
00000
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
�■.■va■
HUNMESIMEM
\R■ ■■ ■I 11, r ■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
ooc.,l.nur.
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
SHEET NO.
X-3

SHEET NO.
X-4
iiiie�r�ii
uuoll"
IMEMEMEMEM
nommommoom
niiiiiiioi
MEMEMEMEME

ooaoor
ooaoor
WINE Eli
orriioor
ooaoor
ooaoor
ooaoor
nouoor
oouoor
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
mrrrrrrr
r---ac-
air.!. 1p Ir.
rr:�rrrw��
rrro:�ro
or�racrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrr
000�:ri
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrr
00000 00000 o►r,_..o
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ooc�mc�
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
o0o00
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rri rorrrrrror
•�r
roiiro
000.orrrr rrrrrrr
rreva�ror
J1►L''L'10rrrr
R.lrrwR�Cdrr
iJrL7Y11Yilrr
nrn;u�!�ror
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
SHEET NO.
n5

■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
olamoommom
IMMIMIMMIN
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
SHEET NO.
X-b

SO' 0' SO'
GRAPHIC SCALE
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 14 OF 35
/
ES DENOTFILL IN
WESETLD
ti
ti
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
N
/
DENOTES EXCAVATION
® IN WETLAND
IMPACTS IN
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
100' ISO'
O
WOODY MAE FARMS,LLC
s=;)l_
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
��iu,
BRIDGE 134: 6" DIAMETER CIRCULAR DECK 0�
DRAINS REQUIRED SPACED 12' O.C.
FROM -L- STA. 34+09 TO STA. 36+01 LT
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET N0.
1 Glenwood Avenue B-4926 4
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel:[phone] RW SHEET NO.
Fax :[phone] ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
License: 0-2197 ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLEIPE PLANS
DO NM USE MR /W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SEE INSET 5C
'l;'1 ' ,Y �, '1 �l �1 j'- i'-� j'-'-..�
/3'-
` i'j'- y" .y. '1 ay
�' j'- -Y )'- nl '1 V i' Y, i'- >' '1
� I
LC I ,� 1- 1, k y" y- �, Y' �, 3' �,,y,y V- y, ,,, y, y � -y, � y. -y �'�'>y
t V. �� '1� �� �� �� y-� '1V V� '1� �� �� �� �� VVy�� V-,y. y � * I&'Y ��' ,, y- �, V , 1 'A '1 'l A'- y' '�'- 'l
'SEE 'INSET.. 5A����� SEE������I
y" .y, i'- Y- iL >' 'l y �l j'- �' iL '1 V �, '1 'l V '1 Y �, �, 'l V �,
y A'- >t y" Y. A'- � y- „ '1 y. V., '�• � V y �>y � A'- y" � .y y- V '1 .� -y � y R V V Y- � � 'i � '1 � Y- � y. � Y- V y- � Y- � � � '1MECHANIZED CLEAR]
� � � � � � �- y,., T- V •: � �`.. � � �y�
V MECHANIZED CLEARING , y'1 ,y �' .,y �" y. y. >1 INSET 5 Y11
Y- 'l '1 'l A'- '1 �'- y- Y" y- 'y EXCAVATION ,. y" �.Y-
swAaR SITE 10A ,
\ \ * .REMOVE SWAMP . y- ,Y- 'y V., y' y Y y" �. Y" V . '1 �.. 'y SITE 1 V'tl y
* *# '1#,yt'�* *'* #
* R�M�V�:. *
_ EXISTING BRIDGE, �
1
I DI I .. .. .. ..--w-.-.. 4 a'- -
DECK DRA N 15
SS PATOR _
* PET1L ---- � --T— --- _
15" W/2 * * * * * * *# .�Cpy 15" W/2 15" W/2g
��------ I -BRIDGE'-°� I ELBOWS o NL 55
ELBOWS ELBOWS _
_-------------------- *-*-* .* L * * ------ --- -----------
_� -- - - 50 PR T E:-
r 2GI - - - - -�&-- - -
1
15"W/2 �Y- may-'l'y'1 �'l ,y V" ,y+'"�" I
ELBOWS 4 .y. -B, y, '1
C A �yy
SITE 10A. .y,`� y" y. y,,y., x SWAMP MECHANIZED CLEARING ' ME CL ARING y,
y. Y. � 'Y �''i.'3., ryJ-':'1 '�, -Y any V"�'y, � �. � y" � � 'Y- ' '1 ' '1 �y
MECHANIZED 'CLEARING 9- '1 y B. y" V �" V y
y, '1 al i'- Y- 'y �, �- y" '1 y, .y. y, i'- 3'- y- 'l
+' y'j'-
SITE S.�����
��
y y � � 9 y. �
'1 '1 i'- y- 'Y T'- '1 >l i'- i'- y- '1 'l �' 'l '1 j' i' 'l '1 -Y '1 i'- i'
y, j'- )'- '1 i'• �1 Y i'- )'- ' V -* �' Y- V- y- 'b �l i' j'- i'- �' 'l �1 y,
y, y, y. i'- iL i'- y'1 'l V Y, i'- i'- 'l �' i'- y- �y y, y. y. �l 1' i'- 'y �l 9' i'- j'- 'l �l �'
i l i i l V
)'" 3' 'l `l V i' )'- V y- V A'- �'- A'. �' �1 �l i'- >'- Al nl �l A'- j'- )'- Y- V -Y i' y, j'- i' � >y V. V i' y, 'y-
>l >l �l i' j'- i'- �1 �l V V V y- 1 Y, y- 'l �l i' j'- i' 3' �l '1 '1 �l Y' i'- � al >l >l �l i'- y. 'L >l i'-i'- �Y i'- '1 'l '�l i'
� �l j'- V 3' 'l ay V, i', j'- i' j'- 'l �. >y �1 i'- 'Y 3'- '1 >y .y -Y" i'- y, y. y. �l +'- � i'- �l �l �1 )' )'
ay V.
+1 �l al i' y. y. '1 .y, V �l +'- y. i'. 3' 'l nl y. �1 i'- j'- i'
y. i'- '1 �l j'- Y- y- 'l �'- >y �1 1' j'- Y' >l 'l al V- i'- j'- i'- '1 ' >l i' � � Y y- 'l �l 3' j'- i'- 3' 'l '1 y- �l +'- i'. >L �1 -Y
�'- i'' nl �l � �' iL i'. '1 'l nl y- y- V i' V � '1 j'- >' i� 3'- �l �l i'- j'- y- '1 y, aj. y, .y. � i'- Y V 'l �1 i' j'-
y. �y y, y. i' j'- i'- �' 'l �1 '1 �l i' y- i'- '1 >y y. )'" i'- i'- �' y. y. j'- y- j'- 'l A'- V i' j'- Y- '1 Y '1 i'- Y- y.
-y'- �' 'l y �l �l �' iL Y �1 -Y. �l i' j'- Y' nl 'l �l 'l i', i' i'- �l �1 '1 i'. i'. �l �l '1 �l j'- Y. i'- �l �l al A'- i'"
A'- V � i'- )' j' y. 'l .y. y, �1 Y- j'- 'L 'Y -Y � y' �' JL nl y' y, y- y, y, al �l �1
V 'l 1 3'- '1 �l j'- Y. 3'- �l �l �lY' �1 'l
y- ,l y i' - i', '1 'l �l
i� � y. y, .y. V, nl j'- y- Y- 'l y. y, j'-
i y- '1 V .y, y, �1 i'- y. y. V, >y �1 i'- '1
�'- j' 'l 'l ay �. i'- j'- y- '1 'l �l al y. y.3' �y y. y. �1 +'- '3'� nL V � �l �l Y"
'l '1 �' )' iL j'- 'l �l i'- �l �' 3' )� nl >y y, +'- i'- .y" y, y. y.
� y. y i' +'- i', y" V V y
. may- �� Y-� � � � � � BIM �' � • � �' �'- V' nl y y - � +'- �' y, >y .y. y.- �1 i'- may, � V nl V i' j'- 'l -
i'- ,l ,1 i' '1 y �l er1M- -'•- - i'- i'. -Y '1 �eTlA- y'
O
CONSERVATION EASEMENT DETAIL 3
DETAIL 6
dT N NORTH CAROLINA HABITAT FOUNDATION EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION p,a p,ed
F DU Cole) EXCAVATE EXISTING (Not 10 SCOIe) Fill Slope
ND AT1 DECK DRAIN DISSIPATOR PAD p
T INo,m s MARK T. SCHOLER
rn
T1NG ON
m 4LA TED
a ROCK AS 1Np1CA T
3:1 OL"A'S ER POT 2G 2
K TO pEiA1L Sf1EE
E pLpT1NG
DISSIPATOR P
PAD
'NOTE: CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW DECK DRAINS
GROUND
GEOT-ILE J 1 5
L- 190,PrtnF F virw
Type of Liner= 54 TONS CL T Rlp-ROp
G.—il- 119 SY GFD
FROM -L- STA. 34+05 TO STA. 35+95 LT
TO APPROMWE ""URAL
GROUND ELEVATION C,R�nF AWAY FROMC-IFRIP RAP
♦�����♦ROCK PLATING
AAAAA..rI•
TO1
DENOTES
EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION
i�000000��
FROM -L- STA. 17+00 TO STA. 23+25 LT
FROM -L- STA. 27+81 TO STA. 34+27 LT
FROM -L- STA. 35+92 TO STA. 40+00 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10-00 TO STA. 12+18 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 RT
PROVIDE CLASS 'II' RIP RAP ROCK PLATING ON
ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR AS INDICATED
ON THE PLANS. 2—FT THICK TO SHOULDER POINT.
REFER TO STANDARD ROCK PLATING DETAIL SHEET 2G—?
0
N

E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
0' 0' �1 '' I 1 a 919.78d Avenue B RW SHE t�
R lei h, NC 27603
1y 'la Te1:919.789.9977 Rr`N SHEET NO.
Fax:[phone]ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
RAPIxC SCA License: C-2197 ENGINEER ENGINEER
PERMIT DRAWING G`" �So
enso-ncuan.lnc.
SHEET 15 OF 35
�% /I ))) \ i+ / C DO NM IJS6 POR /N ACQUISITION
F DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND BOO 5 y)
ti g= DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING G°
® DENOTES EXCAVATION N �
15
IN WETLAND nI
�� �/ DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
®DENOTES IMPACTS IN V �? \(/\'� w V '� 0 UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SURFACE WATER ��2
vI BRIDGE #34: 6" DIAMETER CIRCULAR DECK
9^5
V DRAINS REQUIRED SPACED 12'
FROM -L- STA. 34+09 TO STA. 36+01
ei
G
n r WOODY MAE FARM , LLC
SEE INSET 5 C
T
Ki-
1 y/yV >l i'. i'- y.y.
�'lfY y. >l Y- Y- sy Y. y. >l y- � y- � '1 y--Y. y" � ,y, '1 y, y� y-
� m� '1 i'- 1 �' � 'y � i' 1'S. �' y, y, sl 'y � 'Y- � y, 'Y � � y" y. � y. y, .y 'y Sl )' ,yi 'l y' y. y- i' y" �, y. � �l �l � � 1' �' y' �' y, sl 'l �l j'- j'- y- � '1 'l sl y i' .y' .y'
y, i� y, i'- y. 1 j'- y, s1 y. y" j' j'- i'- 'y y. >l y, y, y, j'- i'- i'- 'y y. y, y'' y. y. y j'- i'. i'- 'l
�, 'y 'y y. y- y, '1 ��l �, y. sy '1 ,y' y, y" '1 'y 'J" y" '1 i )� i' �, 'y sl >l 3' ,Y �, 'L sl y �l sl j'- �, �, al �l �l >l >1 -Bi' � sl
J y' ,1 y' � y- � y" sl y, y, up '1 '1 �l 5� '1 xl y' Y y, 1 al � T'- y'- y- I
�- ,V �
n �
B.
y-
��
*RE
EXISTING ,,�� it � ¥IV
STING BRIDG
J __L _
—\ DECK DRAIN
(aAD*I P
----------- ---- --
* * I* * **/J�' "BRIDGE° W/2
ELBOWS * . * .* I* * *#/ *� * * * * *' * * I �V—S ELBOWS
* * -*-JzjR * *.
-� - — . , ��/�r( � � '�/ I������ ��� ' #�'�#'# # #. #,�*� # #r # # # * * � � /j//fi F/�]/ F /R✓. * * ' � y � y- � sy � ,y� i y'�.ysy"J y. y" y- y'J�
B,
-51
k * * y'- y- �1 Y- ECFLEAy-
, >y � y- y- V .l y- I E$ F�1R �IGl >1 � .Y" � ty' CLEARING
y. '1 'l Y.�, �,
'l sl '1Y'
�, y, y. '1 '1 y" y"
'y y. V. Y' 'y �' y, y, y, ?< sl �y y. y,
� � y'i'-Y �l y, y" y, �l y. y" �Y- j'- j' '1 'l �' V sl � �' y y" y" y. � y. � y.
� y" � y- y" y" '1 y'1 sl �'l y"
y' y, B,
y,
i'- '1 i'. y y'- �, y- y. sl �l sl -Y '�y y'- y- i' y' 3� 'l '1 y, �l sl �l �' j' y, y" sl
y ,Y' y, y, y'- 'y y, .y 'y y. .y 'y
1 � �l 'Y 'Y- -Y- j'- )� � �' � '1 '1 y" � y' y- y" y' �, ?< 'y y. y- )' 'y '1 y, -Y �1 'l �' � y'-
i'- y, �'- y, y- j'-
T� '1 � �'
'l ,l ,l 7- �' '1 'l '1 ,1 l 1 sl '1 'l
y- � 'l ,Y' y,- i'. '1 j'- Y- � � � j'- y- j'- �' sl 'y y. y" >y 'y y,
+- '1 '1 �l y. i'- i� i'- Pi 'l i'- i' i'- 'l ,l 3' y" y" -y s
��--,�may.�����-v-�� z�� y�v--����-��-��
yB.
'l y
'.
sl �' � �, y" y, � y. � -
y. i'- y. y" y- i' sl � 'y .y. y, i� i' '1 'y
'1 � �l � 3'- �, .y, �, y- �, � � sl -Y- y" '1 i'. i' y- i' '1 1' �, '1 - 'l � y- � y. �, y
y'- y. Y' y'- 'l ,1 -I-
y'Y sy �' i'
'1 y, ,y' )'- '1 sl
y�l �'-
y.i'-
''�� ,l '1 ,l � � �'-
'1may. �'-�.)
of Y
'may-'�� ,1 � 1' � '1 y
J3 15 ONSERVATION EASEMEC DETAIL 3
DETAIL 6 6
ORkpl CAROLINA HABITAT FOUNDATION EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION 6�
UNp pT10N DECK DRAIN DIS!IPATOR PAD MARK T. SCHOLE�i Bx[AVATB BxISTING (Not to Scale) Eill slope
eJ y B ROADWAY EMBANKMENT
TO APPROXIMATE NATDRAL 1,
n GROUND
ELEVATION C-IFRIP RAP
kis 5' ll ROCK PLATING (�
W/GEOTICTILE
v Pi AN vI w Ground ]-FT THICK
4 DISSIPATOR
ROM
PAD GRADE Awnv F-0.5 �G, rd PROVIDE CLASS 'II' RIP RAP ROCK PLATING ON
'NOTE: CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW DECK DRAINS TOE OF FILL +F-O.S% Ground
DENOTES ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR AS INDICATED
GROUND EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION ON THE PLANS. 2-FT THICK TO SHOULDER POINT.
�L QUANTITY=EST.26,800 Cv REFER TO STANDARD ROCK PLATING DETAIL SHEET 2G-?
` ING�O SL T ^FROM -L- S A. 17+00 T 23+25 LT
I INT cEOTExruE L5' FWJM -L- TA. 27+81 TO A. +27 LT
.1 OR `DER ZG ? s - 90 PxnmF viFw FROM -L- STA. 35+92 TO ST 40 00 LT
TO EE1 Type of Liner= 5a TONS CL T Rip -Rap ;� FR -DRV- STA. 10-00 TO ST . 12+ 8 LT
ET Geo,05 T T9 BY 5+
P I FR M -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+1 RT
FROM -L- STA. 34+05 TO STA. 35+95 LT
N

DETAIL 3
EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION P,o —d
( No110 Scaie)
EXCAVATE EXISTING Fill Slope
ROADWAY EMBANKMENT
TO NATURAL
APPROXIMATE
GROUND ELEVATION CIL IT RIP RAP
ROCK PLATING
Not un9L _
GroGRADE
WGEOTEXTILE
]-FT THICK
AWAY FROM N.1 ..I
TOE OF FILL +/ 0.5% Grau nd
DENOTES
EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION
QUANTITY=EST. 26,800 CY
FROM -L- STA. 17+00 TO STA. 23+25 LT
FROM -L- STA. 27+81 TO STA. 3 4 + 2 7 LT
FROM -L- STA. 35+92 TO STA. 40+00 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 LT
FROM -0RV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 RT
C
Co
a
d
x
m
E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO,
25' 0' 25' 50' 75'
PERMIT DRAWING
F
®
DENOTES FILL IN DENOTES EXCAVATION
WETLAND ® IN WETLAND
Raleigh, NC 27693
B-49,
5A
RW SHEET NO.
SHEET 16 OF 35
GRAPHIC SCALE
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
S1GlenwoodAvenue
Te1:919.789.9977
Fax[phone]
License: 0-2197
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
Engineering &Construction, Inc.
INCOMPLE
rE PLANS
DO NM USE MR
/W ACQUISITION
INSET
5A
NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DETAIL 3
EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION P,o —d
( No110 Scaie)
EXCAVATE EXISTING Fill Slope
ROADWAY EMBANKMENT
TO NATURAL
APPROXIMATE
GROUND ELEVATION CIL IT RIP RAP
ROCK PLATING
Not un9L _
WGEOTEXTILE
]-FT THICK
GRADE AWAY FROM N.1 ..I
TOE OF FILL +/ 0.5% Grau nd
DENOTES
EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION
QUANTITY=EST. 26,800 CY
FROM -L- STA. 17+00 TO STA. 23+25 LT
FROM -L- STA. 27+81 TO STA. 3 4 + 2 7 LT
FROM -L- STA. 35+92 TO STA. 40+00 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 LT
FROM -0RV- STA. 10+00 TO STA, 12+18 RT
O
E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
25' 0' 25' 50' 75'
PERMIT DRAWING
F
®
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
®
DENOTES EXCAVATI
IN WETLAND
1GlenwoodAvenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
B-49,
5A
RW SHEET NO.
SHEET 17 OF 35
GRAPHIC SCALE
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
®
DENOTES IMPACTS �ON
N
SURFACE WATER
Te1:919.789.9977
Fax[phone]
License: C-2197
Engineering &Construction, Inc.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
INCOMPLE
rE PLANS
DO NM USE MR
/W ACQUISITION
INSET
5A
NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DETAIL 6
DECK DRAIN N_ DISSIPATOR PAD
SIP
DISSIPATOR P
PAD
`NOTE: CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW DECK DRAINS
GROUND
GEOTEXTILE I'S
L- 190' P
Type of Liner= 54 TONS CL 'IRip-Rop
Geotexlile= 119 SY GFD
FROM -L- STA. 34+05 TO STA. 35-95 LT
O
E
25' 0' 25' 50' 75' F DENOTES FILL IN DENOTES EXCAVATION
PERMIT DRAWING WETLAND FM
WETLAND
GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET 19 OF 35
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
INSET 513
T 10
y �.
i;i11;�11dI iq 1 y if�.;1u►�1u�
�II��I�r*1�r �17 �
Iid11''i111 ii � fi'1i1IRA
►,/IIUIICIII f� t �' III%;f%1%%11
11%i11%i1113 �/i11�i'11f�1
'�/IIGGIIGG! '111►010,
% II1111I�' � %i10
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
1 Glenwood Avenue
B-492VCC
5B
Raleigh, NC 27603
S
Te1:919.789.9977
I
RW SHEET NO.
Fax
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
License: C-2197
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
INCOMPLE rE
PLANS
DO NM USE MR
/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

C
Go
a
U
N
a
m
E
a
ti
LJ
Mai
NPR
\�0
(�U
\ .0
N :-
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. I SHEET NO.
25' 0' 25' 50' 75, F DENOTES FILL IN DENOTES EXCAVATION 1Glenwood Avenue B-4926 5C
PERM IT DRAWING ® WETLAND ® IN WETLAND Raleigh, NG27603
SHEET 20 OF 35 Tel:[phone] RW SHEET NO.
DETAIL 6
DECK DRAIN DISSIPATOR PAD
I Nor m scnlel
GRAPHIC SCALE DENOTES MECHANIZED Fax :[phone] ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
.' � License: 0-2197
CLEARING ENGINEER ENGINEER
Engineering &Construction, Inc.
DISSIPATOR P
PAD
INCOMPLE rE PLANS
DQ NM USE MR /N ACQUISITION
`NOTE: CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW DECK DRAINS
GROUN❑
L �1
T
GEOTExTILE P 15
R�F��F VrFw
L I90 .
Type of Liner= 54 TONS CL 'I' Rip-Rop
Georexlile= 119 SV GFD
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
INSET 5C
FROM -L- STA. 34+05 TO STA. 35-95 LT
�. r r
ay '7 MECHANIZED CLEARING
-y N- al l
1 �� �� EXCAVATION ;� ,� aye
�� -� �� �� �� � ��
SITE 1
�y
Af
�:-*E r ,� ,� *E E * *F -4- �y I
m
— aC----�
T L L T T -� —I'll T— � T --T
S— =I_ C— =M T L C—
* 15" W/2 15" W/2 CD NC 55
ELBOWS ELBOWS 0
—
— — —� — — _ — — — — — — — — — — — 50 PR — T — — — —
Fss — — — — — — — — — r . L — — —
_ — —Fss— 2G1 iF _
ol F F F F a F F F F ay �yxriNcyR �k
/* * ?�'
�a
F ��� �Y-�����
F ji:F ,� F F F F * *
E EOWS al �y �y
�y al y ,
�y MECHANIZED N-
y ay MECHANIZED CLEARING CLEARING
L

o
c
o
U
U
N
a
m
E
L
—o
LJ
Mai
NPR
\�0
(�U
\ .0
N :-
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. I SHEET NO.
25' 0' 25' 50' 75, F DENOTES FILL IN DENOTES EXCAVATION 1Glenwood Avenue B-4926 5C
PERMIT DRAWING ® WETLAND ® IN WETLAND Raleigh, NG27603
SHEET 21 OF 35 Tel:[phone] RW SHEET NO.
DETAIL 6
DECK DRAIN DISSIPATOR PAD
I Nor m scnlel
GRAPHIC SCALE DENOTES MECHANIZED Fax :[phone] ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
.' License: C-2197
CLEARING ENGINEER ENGINEER
Engineering &Construction, Inc.
DISSIPATOR P
PAD
INCOMPLE rE PLANS
DQ NM USE MR /N ACQUISITION
`NOTE: CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW DECK DRAINS
GROUN❑
L �1
GEOTExTILE P I5'
R�F��F VrFw
L I90 .
Type of Liner= 54 TONS CL 'I' Ni Rop
Georexlile= 119 SV GFD
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
INSET 5C/.
35-95 LT
FROM -L- STA. 34\/+05 TO ST�\A
-y- �l 7' \may/ \/ Yam\/ 7'�j�\/ Y\/ ��\/�\/� ��\ y-
�( (o -�( Y Y 7'U+" 7' Y Y� -3- Y(
_y,
J' Y \' Y Y Y_\l -y-
Y
� �� L �� �� 4 --14-�� ��� l � � �-yam -5-
-1
� M H+A E� Ei�RIIG
C
� � � �� ��� �F�CC1AVJQyTI� ��
�� � �� ���� ��
�� ,yam �� 751
y
— -
z
=MT�� — — Z
—
*
" g NC
5" W/2 a
WS ELBOWS 28
T 27
FSS _ —
— — — — — — — — — — q
23
22 2 — 0
— —
ol
S
ICI IN
ay
�lE
F
*' * �J
-y
_y NA ,y !� � MECHANIZED �I
ay ZEf LF�4RNC� CLEARING
6 �y �y

MH
!!!!!!!!!!
■■■■■■■■■■ ..........
-....HUH
..........
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
..........
00000
0000000000000000000..
mad
■o■a!!mom■.!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.■... •..-■-■■■.■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.E
moml!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!loi��9.!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!lFIEF-__ ��••..1.!!!!!!!!l
0000 00000 00000 000■oe e-.000uoo e�rz�r r-a_e..[..
0000o r-ro oo■
11:f!'noo oouoo
r:oroouoo col
...NONE
«F�c Yi-n\1i11 jMngn!!!!l
MOMMEMEMMEMEMEMEN
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
eeeeeeeee? �
■.......................................■0000■000000lll■ool.�ra: rur,,v■■.v__1.uii■■■■■u■■■■■■i■u.� _•■.u.r'--QL!IU. Mll■000000o00o0o00o0o00o
■..............................................................roonrocrt�o�....:............................Eli ...■. r�.:ea...........................................
■...............................................................\...11Y rrr��........■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l..........1 YT.IiL17�!!!l.lo.-_�O.■■!■■■.................................
■!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!l!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!l11-.�-. !!!!!l.!■ENNENl.■!!-RFIwln■/www,■n■■■■■■■■■!!!■■.!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!0010111010
■l!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.l.r-- ...-!!!!l.!!!I■!!ll..-.R�=ii�--wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwNONE wwwwwwwwl.!!!!!!!!!■E■■■■■■llwwwwwwwwwlwwwwwwwwwl.!MEMO
!!!!■■■a.i��!�!.711!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l
■■wwwwwwwl.!!!!l..---_—...-!llwwwwwwwwwl.!!!Ir-—i...!!!!!!l.!!!!!!ll!■.!!..■■■■■----------------______----....■■■■.!■l!!!l.!!!!!!!!f.!■ia!!-.1.!!!!!!!!l
■molo—looRr-o..o!■.■o-■�■l.■w Ao.!oo!!oo!!ov!_!ol■e.o:!.!lw!rw!-w!aw!w!lw!-w!ll rowlw�ow�wdowwlow�wlowll.op!!oo!Ili■o.■■o..■l..w�.wwwwe,3�_:aiw_inia_iaiai�ia_iniw_iarulamw■ww-ww!■w!■wluw7��■w�■w�NINI��NEn��■w�■w�■w�ow�w�ow_�_�w!w!w!w!w!u7lnl lu.!w■w'.w.lw.ww.ww.wwu.w.w.w.w.w.n. �n��u��w!w!w!w!w!w!w!u■■w■wiw�nMnn=owEuMuwowwdowrw.owC•w■lw.■c�.e::■- wcc—wcc■al; 7■nI0
..x:o......noEnolo■.:oo_
"ii000loowwwwwwwwwl coI L7Z.on.Loonnu0000uon www!oww!ww!oww!wllulG.w�!ow�!ww!owL!w■wlowwowwowwiwlCll
Iwwwwwlwwwwwwwwwl
ovai.o /s,FI000 wwwwwwwwwl wwwwwwwwwl wwwv r�mo or.o-rrr rr■ ■■r rrrl o00 0o I nolfol colon I oo�Ixn: a.:elool n ■ 0000NI rcr.� r uma:4 a ualaea■■r:.::..c n■■■.uwwwwwwwwl
.■■■■■■■■r, a■E.2woo o■000Eoo.00 moo.a.1o..00llaola:lmu u11.co■oolullNI wlll ...............wllllw.www.o.o■o■coop.■.www■/ww-FIE..oVA :Y �: �i000u0000E
sop oo■ ■■! �-000 ■.- ■o or.ll
r o0000 ■ n000■ 000■o
■.!!Il!!!1.li17!!!!!l.11.■.�l�.!!!!!!!ll
■II■■■ oo!!!c>t000 of noou0000NI n■!�.!■■ oo■oo
■I1■■■■■■■■■■■!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1■■■■.►7Nl.■o!!!.!l
nlv. srmlrA rA'/.r_^nwnzu lra. n!!!!f ■■■■■■■■■NI n■■■■■00 •.■■■NINE
00000000001000000000
!!!!!!!!l l .!!!!!!!l ■.l--dL.
11■I■I!IN/JiI�S JCIr:[nplll/All■■■■■!l.!!!!!!!lll
��■IIow I 06 - L'i�YGV.N .11l!!!!!l.!!!!!!!lll FHAK
--------------- 11 iii001niimiii6.6m ::�Mlilie'T_i i'i::r nlbMO i!!!Miiiii.l lu■■■r■■■■■OEM ...----------"---------""""'=='=-------=
0000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000.rlrrarLr �0000!!oo■o; ll oo! no■ ■oo.iiii iiiiiiiGii iiGiiiiiii ii iGiiiiio iio�ioo
!!!ll.11!!!lll;l.!!!!I!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!lll.11!!!!!!!l.!!!l!!!!l
l!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!lou0000u0000u000nl�7oo-■0--■0--■--■-■-■■-■:■::■:..m...o !lll0000 00000
l!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!o 00000 00000 0000• - -- - .oiull0000 00000
llaaa:•�wce02!ME ..�.�. ati000liou■..rr.rrr�._._.._.,!llawwwwrlanrww!!l
FIrw!!!■::nr�!i��.!!ll.IIIN■7!!!l.!!!!!llllln!!!!!!!l',�F�wr.SiYYV L'lSii�IWiCJII
!__•.--■!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.!!!!!!!!lo000000000oarmmNLU'Lailu�oo ;a... acoloflunnouuoollol000n�a olan:mnsm:mniufol
---------�rc.o.o oo-c---1[•.--------■---------■---------■---------■---------■.n,nnmm�aner.----.:a�_ees■----■nln-L•axlcu lain----II--I1-------.�I■E---9ww.wR--FIFE■■
coo■
cool
.■dL_
00000 000ralra
00000 000a'ms■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■!!■■
0000o ran. !o.�nr.
MMEMEMEN
.!!!!!!!lln,wanneeel
0000o u."ITJEC1Ll
■■■■■■■■■E rwrw7■■■■.
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
000��o ou000
oLc■ca.�. �o cool
MOVE MOVE moo■000■...1sommommommommoN ouoo00000
.won nou0000un
.ol nou0000un ns�ne llmnr:.�ro
ME■E■ I■■■!!■o■ooElo ■oorawrn000
!!!lI!!!l.!!!!!!!!l.11 l!!!}l1.�7 LrlL'�l'.w7!!l
iG'■i91L17■■■
■ENE■ I■■E■ E■■■.....E...........r.!..l'II1:...E
..........aeiu uui�...ii�uiu��uii�u� i

TIMBER
MATTING
TIMBER
MATTING
214'-0" ±
PROPOSED WORK BRIDGE
(8 BENTS W/ 5 HP 12X53
STEEL PILES EACH =
40 TOTAL PILES)
0
I
O0/
I
5 I ELL Hil-E5 EACH =
60 TOTAL PILES)
214'-0" ±
PLAN
TOTAL HPX53 STEEL PILES
FOR WORK BRIDGE
FOR BRIDGE 434 = 100
we
y
1v
�W
A
1�
O
0
s ►nli :ILA
MATTING
IMBER
ATTING
❑ NC
820-355.9933
❑ 1-Cltles. TN
d23 �4fi]-0d0i
423-
0 TN
Vaughn&Mellon
865%5-5000
Consulting Engineers
❑ Spar.anaura, SC
0645]44 ]]5
Asheville,
❑ <nprm,.an,sc
❑ NOrth C,orollno
.43 914.5650
020 253 2]96
❑
■ Rmeign, NC ❑ Cnaria.. ,NC
6061248,6600y
919 9-9455 ]04.35] 0488
0 .a, GA
]]a 62] 3509
ppyrign. p 2— Vo . A Nei.a n
A.Ria_ R r
DWN. BY: WDC DATE: 3/2019
CHKD. BY: TPG DATE: 3/2019
DES. EGR. OF RECORD: PLS DATE: 3/2019
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 23 OF 35
PROJECT NO. B-4926
LENOIR COUNTY
STATION: 35+00o00 —L—
BRIDGE '34
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RALEIGH
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
ACCESS
FOR BRIDGE OVER
NEUSE RIVER OVERFLOW
ON NC-55 BETWEEN
SR 1810 AND SR 1804
REVISIONS SHEET NO.
N0. BY: DATE: N0. BY: DATE: S -1
G TOTAL
� 4 1

00000
..........
..........
L'.LL.......
ncc"r.��oo
c.�uuc.00
..........
..........

aaaaaaaara
aaraaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
arrrrrrrrr
aaaaaaaara
arrrrrrrra
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaaaa
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
aaaaaaaaraaaaa
aaaaaaaaraaaaa
aaaaaaaaraaaaa
aaaaaaaaraaaaa
aaaaaaaaraaaaa
aaaaaaaaraaaaa
aaaaaaaaraaaaa
aaaaaaaaraaaaa
aaaaaaaaraaaaa
00000
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
00000
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
arrrrrrrrr
aaaaaaaaaa
00000
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
ac■cvuu
MOM.4000
oo■ocv
aaaaaaaar-
aaaaaaaaai
aIM1,■naaM■
iiinauatii
raaaarra■aa aaaaaaaaa
■■■■■■■■■■
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
aaaaaaaara
00000
aaaaaaaaaa
000r.a r
Door: a ■
:.aaaaaaaaaa
■■■■wawa■■
aaaaL'a.rrdan
aaaaaaraaa
arrrrrrrrr
00000
aaaaaaraaa
00000
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaannoawoa
�mara�a■
�a�_araoa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaaaaa
00000
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaraaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
00000
aaaraaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
�..r000
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
iii0
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
00000
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaraaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
SHEET NO.
X-9

rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
Cr7If CTr
r11\Ilam 11 -
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
0000r.-
rrrrrrrrll�
rrrrrrrrllr
rrrrrrrrllr
oonrrew
rrrrVr7il711r
:iiiiiiiii
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
!!!!!!!!!!
00000
rrrrrrrr��
rrrrrrrrl'1.�
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
.0000u0000u.rvoou0000u0000u0000u0000u0000u0000u0000u0000u000.u. o0000 00000 00000 00000 000uo 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000
rr,\:1Jrl_!1:\\II rJ_lulrrrrrrrrrr\`\rrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrllr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rliYanYY\rM1I:L'L"�rrrrrrrrrrr\\r7� 9lnnC17!•ln rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.■.........■.....rrn.■nnn.nlr_rn nnn�...r..■rrrrrrrrr...r....rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrlrller.'rilJrerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre:_•s�.v_uueuu n0000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 coon:urrlielmm�:uu_ua•arrrrrrrrrrrrnem!•Ir.�l.uri��mrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rOal:aritirr\rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrYN►YiIrYriiiarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr7ill:/,\']I:11lrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrciYYYYYYGrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
00000 00000 00000 0000o n0000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000
00000 00000 00000 0000o n0000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 or000r oorroo oororo �0000r o0000 00000 00000
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrlYlYi�.rir�.lrr\'r\lllir..11rr\r�rll�\rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
..................................I .0000rl0000rl0000...1......r...............r......................................r...............r......................r...............r..:l .I1. .r.ILA..r�A'Ilir..1LI-.....I■1....r..............r...r.......r......
..........1......r...............r......................................r.............err.....................■r...............r.\�L.LI.-1..=I..rY\.L�.1L�J.JJrJ=�.....r..■...........r...r.......r......
.Yra:uuwr
rv^nrUN
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
o N 0 M -En
rrriirr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
jj.iiI
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
SHEET NO.
X-10

llllllllll
llllllllll
■■■■■■■■■■
llllllllll
■■■■■■■■■■
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
l■l■RNS
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
■■■■■■■■■■
llllllllll
■■■■■■■■■■
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
lllllll�Il
llll�01�31I iI.'
lllllAl9l
■■■■llllli_1
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
■■■■■■■■■■
llllllllll
■■■■■■■■■■
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
��llllllll
llllllllll
l■l■me.
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
.7R7YJI"mI■
I.:\�In, � �IUI
■a 1 gill
illlllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
l■l■l.iI.JlI
:f �Illlllf� I
l■l■ 11J.
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
l■ll■ME
llllllllll
llllllllll
■■■■■■■■■■
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
SHEET NO.
X-11
lllirrr.��r.
oluacuauu
lllllGil[7\
lull\'a'Si1N
llllllllll
llllllllll
r.�000rr.
L''Illllllll'

rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
u-rl II v•r
I�rLILLr']
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrP�
�!7Grrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
uurrrru
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrONEE
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
oorrrruo
rrrrrrm,
rrrrrrrl�ir
000arr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
uuourr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
000ro:
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
Qrrrrrrrr
Il`rrrrrrrr
rr0000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
00000
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrr
SHEET NO.
X-12

..........
II •rid ..I'.
J.9l1LL.\
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
mlw1.;;no
I \III q..1 I.I
'11'.I I.. ml I ,
J..LJ...HL..011
.....
mom mom No
loom......
..........
..........
0000
..........
..........
..........
..........
mommomm
..........
..........
..........

..........
..........
mommumamom
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
��.......■......--.......................
------------------
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................

nommoommommommomm No
n...nnecn nnnRerr.�u
.....I�aly�l�il�`I ►:1 IA,1 J..
MEMO Non an• sua uscMINT,
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
a000.a e000..•_
....................

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
16+04 - 18+45 -L- RT
Roadway Construction
0.07
239**
2
16+69 - 17+11 -L- RT
Channel Change Excavation
0.01
2
16+69 - 17+09 -L- RT
Easement Clearing/EC Devices
0.01
3
18+43 - 20+14 -L- RT
Roadway Fill
0.08
3
18+44 - 20+22 -L- RT
Easement Clearing/EC Devices
0.06
4
20+79 - 22+84 -L- RT
Roadway Fill
0.18
4
20+79 - 22+14 -L- RT
Easement Clearing/EC Devices
0.04
5
19+42 - 22+46 -L- LT
Roadway Cut
0.01
5
18+91 - 22+46 -L- LT
Easement Clearing/EC Devices
0.17
6A
22+68 - 24+53 -L- RT
Temp. Work Bridge Const.
0.26
6A
22+76 - 23+06 -L- RT
Roadway Fill/Bridge Const.
0.01
6A
23+54 - 23+76 -L- CL
Proposed Bridge Bent
0.01
6A
24+44 - 24+57 -L- CL
Proposed Bridge Bent
< 0.01
6B
23+03 - 24+88 -L- LT
Clearing in PUE
0.09
6B
23+94 - 24+78 -L- LT
Temp. Work Bridge Const.
0.04
6B
23+60 - 24+68 -L- LT
Existing Bridge Removal
0.06
SHEET TOTALS*:
0.29
0.02
0.74
0.07
239
0
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Summary Sheet 1 of 4
**Site 1 Impacts are Permanent SW Impacts in Pond - designated as Pond in NRTR and 'JS-NONMIT' in WET file
Revised 2018 Feb

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS URFA E WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
7
24+78 - 24+88 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
25+43 - 25+55 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
25+73 - 25+84 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
26+03 - 26+14 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
26+33 - 26+44 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
26+63 - 26+73 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
26+93 - 27+03 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
27+23 - 27+32 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
27+52 - 27+62 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
27+77 - 27+86 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
108
7
24+91 - 25+02 -L- LT
Existing Bridge Bent Removal
< 0.01
7
25+41 - 25+52 -L- LT
Existing Bridge Bent Removal
< 0.01
7
26+07 - 26+17 -L- LT
Existing Bridge Bent Removal
< 0.01
7
26+56 - 26+67 -L- LT
Existing Bridge Bent Removal
< 0.01
7
27+05 - 27+17 -L- LT
Existing Bridge Bent Removal
< 0.01
7
27+55 - 27+67 -L- LT
Existing Bridge Bent Removal
< 0.01
7
24+58 - 24+65 -L- CL
Proposed Bridge Bent
0.01
7
25+34 - 25+56 -L- CL
Proposed Bridge Bent
0.01
7
26+24 - 26+46 -L- CL
Proposed Bridge Bent
0.01
7
27+14 - 27+36 -L- CL
Proposed Bridge Bent
0.01
129
SHEET TOTALS*:
0.04
0.12
129
108
t�0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Summary Sheet 2 of 4
Revised 2018 Feb

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
7
24+64 - 24+98 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
25+56 - 25+88 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
26+44 - 26+77 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
27+35 - 27+50 -L- LT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
24+52 - 24+63 -L- RT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
51
7
24+82 - 24+92 -L- RT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
25+41 - 25+51 -L- RT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
25+70 - 25+80 -L- RT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
26+00 - 26+10 -L- RT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
26+29 - 26+39 -L- RT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
26+60 - 26+69 -L- RT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
26+88 - 26+98 -L- RT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
7
27+17 - 27+33 -L- RT
Temporary Work Bridge Bent
< 0.01
8
27+85 - 33+78 -L- RT
Roadway Fill
0.72
8
28+62 - 33+78 -L- RT
Clearing in Easement/EC Devices
0.15
9
28+41 - 34+00 -L- LT
Clearing in Easement/EC Devices
0.33
9
31 +90 - 33+84 -L- LT
Roadway Cut
0.10
10A
33+78 - 34+08 -L- RT
Bridge Const./Embankmnent
0.04
10A
35+94 - 36+22 -L- RT
Bridge Const./Embankmnent
0.04
SHEET TOTALS*:
0.80
0.10
0.48
0.09
0
51
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Summary Sheet 3 of 4
Revised 2018 Feb

Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
10A
34+00 - 36+00 -L- LT
Clearing in PUE
0.121
10A
34+00 - 36+00 -L- LT
Temp. Work Bridge Const.
0.155
10A
34+04 - 34+27 -L- LT
Grading for Bridge Removal
0.006
10A
35+94 - 36+20 -L- LT
Grading for Bridge Removal
0.007
10A
34+25 - 35+94 -L- LT
Existing Bridge Removal
0.125
10A
34+09 - 35+94 -L- LT
Deck Drain Dissipator Pad
0.021
10A
34+57 - 34+68 -L- CL
Proposed Bridge Bent
0.008
10A
35+32 - 35+43 -L- CL
Proposed Bridge Bent
0.008
10A
34+08 - 36+00 -L- RT
Temp. Work Bridge Const.
0.295
10A
34+08 - 36+00 -L- RT
Clearing in R/W
0.113
10B
36+00 - 41+99 -L- LT
Clearing in Easement/EC Devices
0.344
10B
36+86 - 37+57 -L- LT
Roadway Cut
0.002
10B
38+28 - 40+00 -L- LT
Roadway Cut
0.012
10B
40+39 - 41+62 -L- LT
Roadway Fill
0.031
11
36+22 - 40+81 -L- RT
Roadway Fill
0.400
11
36+22 - 41+90 -L- RT
Clearing in Easement/EC Devices
0.151
SHEET TOTALS*
0.467
0.000
0.028
1.304
0.000
Sheet 1 Totals
0.291
0.000
0.023
0.745
0.000
0.07
0.00
239**
0
0
Sheet 2 Totals
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.04
0.12
129
108
0
Sheet 3 Totals
0.804
0.000
0.101
0.482
0.000
0.00
0.09
0
50
0
PROJECT TOTALS*:
1.56
0
0.15
2.53
0
0.11
0.21
368
158
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Summary Sheet 4 of 4
**Site 1 impacts are permanent SW Impacts in Pond - designated as Pond in NRTR and 'JS-NONMIT' in WET file
2018 Feb

See Sheet to For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Plan Sheet Symbols
See Sheets RW- t Thru RW-? For RW Plan Sheets
/ Tel A
1
1804
55
BEGIN PROJECT : `/ 1,` f C8
W
2 I
z� l k/7 1;
1"N 7 1" seen st
�804
PROJECTS -!'I r�
926
N ill
I VICINITY MAP I
STATE OF -flORTJI-ffil�-A-RMJE�TA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
LENOIR COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO.20 AND BRIDGE NO.34 ON NC 55
OVER THE NEUSE RIVER AND NEUSE RIVER OVERFLOW
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURES
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
j
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 7
DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SUPERELEVATION.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN
DATA
ADT 2023 =
3152
ADT 2040 =
3900
K =
9 %
D =
60 %
T =
8 %
V =
60 MPH
* TTST=3% DUAL=5%
FUNC CLASS
=
MAJOR COLLECTOR
"REGIONAL TIER"
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4926 = 0.387 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4926 = 0.143 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4926 = 0.530 MILES
Prepared In the Office of.
en
I 12al- 1117111
M Tel:919.]89.997]
S 1 Glwood Avenue
Fax[phone]
License: C-2197
Engineering &Construction. Inc.
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
RANT RAMKUMAR, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
SEPTEMBER 16, 2022
DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
LETTING DATE:
SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
CASEY K. WHITLEY, PE, PLS
NCDOT CONTACT
STATB
arAT6 PRWB R6PB MM NO
axeer
NQ
TOTAL
SR—
N. C.
B-4926
I
6TATa PaOl.NO
F.A.-M.
aBaCa1Pr10N
40163.1.2
WA
PE
40163.2.1
WA
RW & UTILITIES
40163.3.1
WA
CONST.
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
-1
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FlNAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

,or0' SO'
100' ISO'
GRAPHIC SCALE
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 7
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ® ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
/
/
all,
CONCRETE REMNANTS —
REMOVAL SEE DETAIL 7,
w� �
3c T �y -y�
3c � y JRE1<AOVE jp.L EXIS§IN5 yCCVAGREi`E RID
RETAIN EXISTING POLES
tWTMENT�EMNyAN�STrNGy JO CR�TB� 3r
AR STZlt
j
/ {{/ ' � �1 �- � WN Ck'I' RIP -RAP /
3r- j,- Y s +" 3c T" i, d< y d< 3t 3c T" BGSBE ETA 4
y.Pl �" C"CCIET�PILL C ��
IS
ARS PUEs'�P J�
w RODNEY E. COLE
�` _ /
18" GR-
U' —
A, r
�/ y�o R c / / rrr '__—
s / C/--
/ GR C/
']
I sd
too PET
3c� �F � � %� P V 1� _—T❑,L-- 6r 3�T'' '� �3td`\
t�3r s- F
I I Wiz
d, i� dc-
25b'BST . 1 pUE � �34It ��`�` ��`� ��`d` ' Pc��` ���` �.��`�/ " �il
�.w`T`
S, d< �.
�at
�0 GE CE-1,1'MMA4NiGY �� �/ ��� j�� f ��� �S, S,�
At T` '� T- 14
��
—
s
I 4FTYB SE�CI9AI�NE (CHANGE
a' -*A m m
JEF3cDETAL A, � � � � � � � it
�J
01
V
a
E
DETAIL 3
EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION Proposed
( Not to SC k)
EXCAVATE EXISTING Fill Slope
ROADWAY EMBANKMENT
TO APPROXIMATE NATURAL
GROUND ELEVATION
CL.'IFRIP RAP
ROCK PLATING
G
WO
2-FT THICK
GRADE AWAY FROM Natural
TOE OF FILL +F-0.5% Ground
DENOTES
EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION
QUANTITY=EST. 26,800 CY
FROM -L- STA. 17+00 TO STA. 23+25 LT
FROM -L- STA. 27+81 TO STA. 34+27 LT
FROM -L- STA. 35+92 TO STA. 40+00 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 12+18 RT
DETAIL 2
CHANNEL CHANGE
( Not to Sc le)
e
,N
Propozed 1
G
N.t.U.I
T
d �7 p 1"iFt.
Fill Slope �• ,
�E,n,t.
GEOTEXTILE B Min. D=4.0 Ft.
Chaaael
Max. d=FULL DEPTH OF BACKSLOPE
Type of Liner=EST. 555 TONS B=B4O Ft.
Class 'II' Rip Ron, b=5.0 Ft.
Geotextile=EST. 560 SY
FROM -L- STA. 16FE10 TO STA. 18+43 RT
LATERAL BASE DITCH
?
Not to Sralel b
-DRY- 7 Fpp
_
d
\moo` O.Sti, Slapelll
GE.TEXTILE
B Mi, D=1.0 Ft.
Mox.d=LO Ft,
B=1.0 R.
Min. b=2.0 Ft.
Type of U.— EST. 100 TONS CIE 'I' Rip-Rop
Geotextile= EST. 150
SY DDE = EST. I10 CY
FROM -L- STA. 21+00 TO STA. 22+50 LT
DETAIL 5
STANDARD BASE DITCH
I Hol ro Sralel
oral Natural
Graun Graun
D D,
d
Geote.tile B Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Mo., d=1.0 Ft.
B=1.0 FL
pe ofLin—EST 95 TONS CL T Rip-R p
r
_oteatle= EST. 140 SY: DDE= EST. 143 CY
FROM -L- STA. 22+50 TO STA. 23+90 LT
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
S I 1 Glenwood Avenue B-4926 4
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel:[phone] RrW SHEET NO.
Fax :[phone] ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
License: 0-2197 ENGINEER ENGINEER
Engineering &Construction, Inc.
m INCOMPLE E PLANS
DO NM USE MR /N ACQUISITION
O
m N
m c�S DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
/ 00 UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
m�
m
ti
SEE INSET 4A 3
W DY MA FAR S,LLC
t
- RUE PUE RUE pU I� S, 1
Y
� e
REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE =
CONCRETE ----� -_s�_ _
z
BRIDGE 20 I �--
CONCRETE REMNANTS REMOVAL DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
EXISTING CONCRETE NATURAL GRO UND
TO BE ����������������������
DENOTES
1�����1�������iti...F,EXCAVATION
♦������♦
♦������♦NATURAL
GROUND
ti
E)l
S y 3r � Tr
A��
Tc�d` �
/ / O
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
a NORTH CAROLINA WIKLDLIFE HABITAT FOUNDATION
MART.SCHOLER
H
ti
n,
PROVIDE CLASS 'II' RIP RAP ROCK PLATING ON
ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR AS INDICATED
ON THE PLANS. 2—FT THICK TO SHOULDER POINT.
REFER TO STANDARD ROCK PLATING DETAIL SHEET 2G—?

s0' 0' SO' 100'
ISO'
GRAPHIC SCALE
BUFFER DRAWING
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ®
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS
ZONE 2
SHEET 3 OF 7
RODN E.
ss**s* *** **** § * R E$511
OVEy XISTING
METEEPILLA
* * ****
GRR
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
/ C I d Glenwood Avenue B-492V 4
Raleigh, NC 27603
S E P Tel:[phone] RAW SHEET NO.
(V( Fax :[phone] ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
r s� License: C-2197 ENGINEER ENGINEER
v Engineering & Construction, Inc.
m INCOMPLE rE PLANS
(\� ^� P
� /N /� / DO NM USE MR/N ACQUISITION
co
lfa
RETAIN
i II
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNORES COMPLETED
y-� � % � P V 1 � — -3r—'— 3c y" * \ 3'' * y" * 3c * * ��✓ ELB W
* *vAvna*
_A1 *�*
*J, 's may.*I **d m*B`J y-* y- * m ** =* 9c **
***Im�"�`*`�'** * * * A,� �** � ** **
">GE � * iNA NNGv`
34 Allo"AN
21 �'_u
* * TrBSE h9AN NGE HA�i jc k
** * **
EA
INM WILD LISCBIT UNDATION HOL
To"
*
9 I l
— — DETAIL 4 DETAIL 5 DFTAII 7
DETAIL 3 DETAIL 2
D'
D EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION CHANNEL CHANGE GORE AREA SPECIAL STANDARD BASE DITCH CONCRETE REMNANTS REMOVAL DETAIL
O Prepared LATERAL BASE DITCH INe1m sralel
U EXCAVATE EXISTING (Nadia Scale) Fill Slop. I Not to Scale) I Not fo scalel (NOT TO SCALE)
ROADWAY EMBANKMENT b I�b Natural Natural
= TD APGRRouINo APPROXIMAollVATITE
Prepe:=d � a° Od _DRv- Eo/°� °asl �— cre.n �.==l,
EXISTING CONCRETE NATURAL GROUND
N ROCIFRIPRAP Notuml Fin slap= _� e,. o v� siopei° d ° To BE REMOVED PROVIDE CLASS 'll' RIP RAP ROCK PLATING ON
d ROCK PLATING u� ,� D 1„iFl / d ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR AS INDICATED
W/GEOTEXrILE d J Min. D=1.0 Ff. Geote.tile B
NadV 2-FT rHlcl< GForExraF n DENOTES \ ON THE PLANS. 2—FT THICK TO SHOULDER POINT.
GEOTEXTILE B Min. D=4.0 Ft. Gist. Chen=I Max. d=1.0 Ft. B_ 0 FL 2
GRADE Awnv FRon ,°I B=10 R, EXCAVATION REFER TO STANDARD ROCK PLATING DETAIL SHEET 2G—.
E TOE OF FILL +F-0.5% Greend Max. d=FULL DEPTH OF BACKSLOPE Min. b=2.0 Ft. Type of Liner- EST 95 TONS CL T R.,-Rap CL. 9P wP rAP
Type of Liner=EST. 555 TONS B=B4O Ft. Ge°tex+ile= EST. 140 SY; DDE= EST. M3 CY ROCK PLATING 22
a DENOTES Class 'll' Rip Rop Type °f Uner= EST. 100 TONS CL 'I' Rip -Rap W/GEOTEXTILE
TOTAL EXCAVATION b=5.0 H. ELEV.UND _„
a EXCAVATION Geodexdile=EST. 560 $Y G—wdile= EST.150 SY DDE = EST. I10 CY RO - $TA. 22+50 TO S .23 90 L 4 ]-FT THICK I/Lrl 14
QUANTITY=EST. 26,800 CY NATURAL GROUND
r FROM L-. 16+10 TO TA. +4 L- TA. +00 TO + LT FRO -STA. 21+75 TO S .22 s
N[0 FRO -L- STA. 17+00 T 5 LT C / @ ry F
F M -��A
4+27 T G� \`--_<
OM -L0+00 LTGFROM D2+18LTROM 12+1 RT �•. r" S
O .

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. 1 SHEET NO.
Ch
a
x
a
E
25' 0' 25' 50' 75'
GRAPHIC SCALE
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 7
RETAIN EXISTING POLES
S ;)I
Fx"9.7 29B91eigh NG 3e
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ® ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
PU E-,T- �PNd j
��1� - - h
181 9w--OR
X
C X
INSET 4A
�y
N 1
4)
PUE PUE
PU
PUE
REMOVE
EXISTING BRIDGE
- -w-
-
- -w- -
X
Tom=
--1
CONCRTE
`
BRIDGEE 20
1
I
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLEIPE PLANS
DO NM USE MR /N ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DY MAF/ FARPS, LLC
/ A�
—T —� L _
-
-
-T-- TB2�G
- �Iz-

25' 0' 25' 50' 75'
GRAPHIC SCALE
BUFFER DRAWING ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ® ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
SHEET 5 OF 7
RETAIN
—>s
�N
23 20
22
INSET 4A
�l
S ;)I
Fxgl9.7 295
913e
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-4926 4A
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INC�MPLE E PLANS
W NM USE MR /N ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
/ PUE PUE PUE co
to \ P
REMOVE �
ISTING BRIDGE -
- —w—,-
C
=T—T L — 1 T—
o GE T20
-r=
—T— — / y B-ItI
_ L
J1 n
T
ELB W �
-
��
Al �v ��

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACTS BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
Site Station Structure ROAD PARALLEL
No. (From/To) Size / Type BRIDGE ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
CROSSING IMPACT
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1
23+64 - 24+96 -L- LT/RT
Proposed Bridge/Removal
X
7226
5132
12358
of Existing Bridge
1
26+98 - 28+56 -L- LT/RT
Proposed Bridge/Removal
X
7707
4831
12538
of Existing Bridge
TOTALS*.
14933
9963
24896
0
0
0
0
0
NOTES
2018 Feb

WETLANDS IN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLANDS IN
BUFFERS
SITE NO.
STATION
(FROM/TO)
ZONE 1
(tt2)
ZONE 2
(tt2)
1
23+64 - 24+88 -L- LT
7003
4805
1
28+41 - 28+56 -L- LT
106
1
27+85 - 27+99 -L- LT/RT
172
ITOTA L: 1 7003 1 5083 1
2018 Feb
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
10/13/22
LENOIR COUNTY
B-4926
40163.1.2
SHEET 7 OF
Rev.Jan 2009

Jy�
h
2
EXISTING BRIDGE 20
WOODY MAE FARMS,LLC
DB 1153 PG 132
DB 1816 PG 689
— W L B — — — — — — — — —
— — — — PB 6 PG 276
— — — — — — — — — — x L B — — — —
E FARMS'LLC I — — — — — vle—
---�
WOODY 1153 PG 132
D
1816 PG 689 I
w PE, 6 PG 276 m
EXISTING BRIDGE 34
z I \ \ SWAMP
I \\ \\ SWAMP I
— \ — _ _ — — —B,W— EXISTING R/W m
— W — J o — ` — — — — — — — — — — — — — B l Y — — — — — — — — —
SEAT ELE2.N35.2P Ml�_ �_n _ r_ i— i s _l r— L _i _s SEAT ELEV•=25.06 \ — —v— — SEAT ELEV.=25.14' —W— — _ — — — — —elx— — — — — — — —
— — — m
v
�JI MTL _ i
I-------------
��� MTL-i— - r �— i— r —T --r SEAT EL— EV.=2S.IS' s � r ySEAT ELEV.=25.15' �—
�T ELEV.=34.36' L — — — — — — /�w \�— — — — — — — — — — — — T — — —_ _
—wLe_ �J1� MT'--- T,
— — / I —wL0 _ 1 _
—Fss— — ED
—Fss— — — - .--�� n[g� •_ /.--�+-w� _ _ l— f55— — — —FsS— — — —FSS—� — — — — — — — — —� —nLO— — — — — — — — — — — — — —wLB— — _ —
FS�'----
/
TION EASEMENT FOUNDATION
CONSERW LDLIFE HABIT AT
NORTH CAROUNA T. SCHOLF
M ARK
DB 1408 PG 452
OB 1489 PG 253
DB 1512 PG 534
Pb 9 PG 356
---
50 PR —T— ----
-T / EXISTING R/w
I
i SWAMP
I
SWAMP
I I
SW I
I
I
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
I
I
I
----e,x--------------e,n-------
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPERTY BOUNDARY CONSERVATION EASEMENT
NORTH CAROLINA HABITAT FOUNDATION
MARK T,SCHOLER
08 1408 PG 452
DB 1469 PG 253
08 1572 PG 534
PB 9 PG 356
nu
GRAPHIC SCALE: I"-1001 GlenB-4926 — Conservation Easement Impacts Raleighwood Avee
, NC 27603
S� Te1:919.789.9977
so 25 o so ioo EXISTING CONDITIONS � Lcense:C21991
Engineering & Construction, Inc.

4
J
PUE
h,
2
PROPOSED BRIDGE 20 0
WOODY MAE FARMS.LLC
DB 1153 PG 132
DB 1816 PG 66
89
—WLB— — — — — — — — —
— — — — PB 6 PG 27
3 , ———WLe—————————--
FARM
S.LLC--
WLB----�
OODY M PG 132ic, ,f
DB g6 PG 669 m PROPOSED BRIDGE 34
PB 6 PG 276 � _ — PT f I
- PC SIC, 55+
I \ � rrrrrr......I
\ �7TUE
I \\ \� SWAMP 1
JE �� PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE EU�
J PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PU C3
I
—�— —�—�:— --,W— e— pUF E
C c
—C —ezrTi
- rtrtc —�-._ cs �, Lc --W-- r ---- - - - --
- -
SE EL V.�35.2P _s �� SEAT ELEV.-25.06'L+ SEAT ELEV.=25.14 — — — —" —%»' �� / e,u
:_ �- —_— — — — — — I =Z _xw— ri—MTV_ �.—r .. s' _>: _r_ >•_nL _,_ _i
L_A C`
IDOE —CONCRETE 1 SBG / 1 RIOGE
AT EV.=34.36'
��
— LB
— — — — — — — w
— — —
—
�r —_-- — —
— — — — —
u—
ss— — _
—
— — ss -
_
— — — _ _ 0 — — — — — — — —rss —
-$BCa
-----,_ -art
50 PR_
GREItw -� �-
----
F
-
—
BG
------ -- -
- --
m
-
_
J
r
EXISTIKic qiN P F
u
S=AMP
_
F
R F P E
F F
F �
E E
F �
.. .. F
E DE E R
SWAMP
E— DE
E F —E
E
l
SWAMP
Ih
u
PROPOSED
RIGHT—OF—WAY
I
'
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
\
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
I
a m
Q
e,Y--------------BIN-------------
I
—a,u---- ---------
O
BIN--------------
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
O
VATION EH pBM ATT F OUNDPTION
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
CONSER
W WIt'-ToNLDLiF
NORTH CAROLINA HABITAT FOUNDATION
�• NORTN CAROLINMpRK T•SCHO452 LER
PG
T, C
MARK SHOLERpn 08 1408 PG 452
ro DB I'( 253
489 PG
DB 1469 PG 253
2 pg 1512 PG 534
9 PG 356
OB 1572 PG 534
PB 9 PG 356
Pb
_
GRAPHIC SCALE: I"=20
— Conservation Easement Impacts
1 Glenwood AvenueB-4926
Raleigh, NC 27603
io s o io 20
S I
Te1:919.789.9977
PROPOSED ROADWAY
e
Lcense:C219971
Engineering & Construction, Inc.

Jy�
h
PROPOSED BRIDGE 20 0
WOODY MAE FARMS.LLC
DB 1153 PG 132
DB 1816 PG 689
—WLB— — — — — — — — —
———— ---- PB 6 PG 276
3 ---nLB——————————————NLB————
M FpRMS•LLC , TEMPORARY WORK BRIDGES PRC Sic, 19t=
WOODY PG 132 ,
+ Dgg6 G276 G9 m PROPOSED BRIDGE 34 _ _ PT Sta. 414
1 --sla 31 f z= -- PC SIC, 55+t&a
M� I�
SITE 9
` SWAMP ITE 10A
I
-PUE # # # # * # # * # # ## * * # * # * # ** # # # # # * ## * # * # * # # # #* * * #* # * # * # * #PHE
# * ## # * # # # * # * * ## * * * * # * # # # *# # * # #
* * * # #
POE
—PU .� c
C C
*SWT*EL,4V k2 4' .. _ _ N
n—
P,
c8G-- ----
_-
5T
G �AT EV.=34.36' �-
50 PR _
_ -- _s-- — 5 -- -- --- --- — GRBItT-L—�
A - _
• F PUF
F # * # * * # * # # *# * # * * * * # F F # F * # * F I
� SITE 11
�— ##*
�, � � � SITE l0A �� � SWAMP �3
MM
R
SITE 8 PROPOSED RIGHT—OF—WAY
� I
I
FILL, IN/WETLANDS
MECHANIZED CLEARING PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSERVATION EASEMENT
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
I
a m
Q
_ 1
—B,r---- ---------
Bu--------------
e,n--------------8,---------------
O CONSERVATION EASEMENT O
VATION EH pBM pTT FOUND ATION PROPERTY BOUNDARY CONSERVATION EASEMENT
CONSER
W \'A'LPE NORTH CAROLINA HABITAT FOUNDATION
OLIN ER MARK T. SCHOLER
NORTH CARMARK T, SCH452 OL pn PG GB 1408 PG 452 ro pg 1408 PG 253 DB 1469 PG 253
2 pg1489
1512 PG 534 OB 1572 PG 534
Pb 9 PG 356 PB 9 PG 356
GRAPHIC SCALE: I"=201 Glenwood AvenueB-4926 —Conservation Easement Impacts Raleigh, NC 27603
Te1:919.789.9977
so 25 o so ioo WETLAND IMPACTS S e I Lcense:C219971
Engineering & Construction, Inc.

PUE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT PARCEL IMPACTS
FILL IN WETLANDS - INSIDE PROPOSED RN/: 0.8567 ACRE
FILL IN WETLANDS - INSIDE TCE: 0.1295 ACRE
MECHANIZED CLEARING - INSIDE PROPOSED RN: 0.3481 ACRE 7-
MECHANIZED CLEARING - INSIDE TCE: 0.2579 ACRE 00�
TOTAL IMPACTS ON PARCEL: d�
FILL IN WETLANDS = 0.9862 ACRE
MECHANIZED CLEARING = 0.6060 ACRE �<9
2
PROPOS D BRIDGE 20 O'
WOODY MAE FARMS°LLC
DB 1153 PG 132
DB 1816 PG 689
-NLB— — — - - - - - -
- - - - PB 6 PG 276
- - - - - -xLB- -
O /
- - - - - - - - -
MAE FARMS° LLC I
Le
� _
W000 y 132
DB PC 6Bg
DBg85 PG 2T6 m
+
PROPOSED BRIDGE 34
_ _ PT Sta. 41 f
- - f
i
' \
I \\ \\
APU
A �
SWAMP
1
-PUE PUE\
J PUE R
PUE PUE PUE PUE
- \
PUE PUE PUE
EUEQ
PUE PUE PUE
PUE PU
PU c- e o
(/<A
c -- c
to .ri;r.. .. .. ..-.- .. .. ..
�• --� --a,Y
`� c
.. i --� e
�f
-e ix
Ct ..
SE EL V.N35.2P
' �`—� a�—r — r C 1 -L, T—C L _s
.. ..� .. — —Y— —
T SEAT ELEV,25.061 \
,-
SEAT ELEV.=25.14' — — — —"
c c -
_ �— — — _ —Y,Y— — — — — — — —
— �` ..s
— —
-- ------_—
(� //LL ONCRETE
__ / SITES 10/'1 F °34L
---- --
SBG
__—_---
---- -----
--- ---
NC 55 5T
-S�—G AT EV.=34.36'
��
--- —�
SEA7—ELE 5,15
-- —_—_
��
— — — — — — — — —
—3.
— —
��
- --
0
—°ss 50 PR
--_- --- --GREIi-TL-
SR, �
F
---
;ems -
�------ s-�--5--
�--- - -
---- - --- -------�e��
pp
T - w'n _`b.
_-_
..
1 ,r < 7\ ✓ }: y.
.. .. EXISTIWY
-
PUF
LK I
_ _
y
y�PE3Ei
SITE 1b
�
SITE 8xx�
I
W
SWAMP
b �
ONSERVATION EASEMENT
R
PROPOSED
�
PARCEL BOUNDARY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
�
/\
ym
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
SITE 10A IMPACTS ON PARCEL
SITE 11 IMPACTS ON PARCEL
j
��
/
SITE 8 IMPACTS ON PARCEL
FILL IN WETLANDS
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TCE) INSIDE PROP, R/W: 0.0033 ACRE
FILL IN WETLANDS
INSIDE PROP. P.W: 0.2956 ACRE
m
FILL IN WETLANDS
MECHANIZED CLEARING
INSIDE TCE: 0.0158 ACRE
\
INSIDE PROP. RiW: 0.5578 ACRE
INSIDE TCE: 0.3407 ACRE
MECHANIZED CLEARING
INSIDE TCE: 0.1137 ACRE
INSIDE PROP. R/W: 0.091 ACRE
m
MECHANIZED CLEARING
INSIDE TCE: 0.0105
INSIDE TCE: 0.091 ACRE
—YIN— — — — — — — — — — — — — —Y,Y— — — — — — — — — — — —
I
— — — — —
O
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
— —Y,N— — — — — — — — — — — — — —YIN— — — — —
— — — — —Bln— — — — — — — — — — — — —
O
EH pM ATT FOUND ATION
PARCEL BOUNDARY
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SERVATION
CON B
WILDLIFE
NORTH CAROLINA HABITAT FOUNDATION
NORTH CAROLINA T.SCHOLER
MARK 452
RG
MARK T•SCHOLER
08 1408 PG 452
DB I408
OB 1489 PG 253
DB 1489 PG 253
DB 1572 PG 534
08 1572 PG 534
Pb 9 PG 356
PB 9 PG 356
GRAPHIC SCALE: I"-100
B-4926 — Conservation
Easement Impacts
1 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
50 25 0 50 100
I I I
WETLAND IMPACTS WITHIN CONSERVATION
S I
I
Te1:919.789.9977
la.:91 89.9 91
I
eE
EASEMENT PARCEL BOUNDARY ONLY Engineering & Construction, Inc.
:

APPENDIX C

LEGEND
INSTALL (RED)
REMOVE (GREEN)
EXISTING TO REMAIN (BLUE)
ABANDON (ORANGE)
TEMPORARY (YELLOW)
PERMANENT UTILITIES EASEMENT
AERIAL UTILITIES EASEMENT
TYPICAL DE R/W EASEMENTS
30 FT R/W F 10 FT 1
10 FT
15 FT
15 FT 15 FT
10 FT R/W
GUYING 1111 FT 10 FT
EASEMENT 0 y
10 FT FT
11 s FT {
OVERHEAD UNDERGROUND
R/W R/W
QUSP:
SAFETYFIrSt
RECLOSER:
USP: BREAKER:
SUBSTATION:
°�°`EFO�
Safety Reminders / Adverse Conditions
WZS: Remember "Your Circle of Safety"
WZS: HEAVY TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA
WZS:
?: FLAGGERS NEEDED
USP:
ENERGY.
?:
p PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY
p ACTIVE CARING
USP:
S4FE�
?
WZS:
0. HAZARD RECOGNITION
USP:
i•
WZS:
REMEMBER: Work zone area conditions may have changed for this job! Everyone is responsible for verifying the above safety information is correct prior to any work being performed each day. Aw
RODNE Y E. COL E
DB 574 PG 654
DB 1457 PG 804
ALL TFOs ON THIS SHEET
ARE IN A HFZ
�1' r
aw
Lw
X. y 7.
' � � � -k V.
1
Ac
ca CIO
9c �� �9c �� �9c �� �9c�\ co
A,
1
WLS
LAND AGENT & VEGETATION MANAGEMENT
OPS CENTER:
RESP. CENTER - ENG:TREE CLEARING:ROW:
ACTIVITY - ENG: E TREE CLEARING: I ROW: E
Pr LKE
ENGINEERING
4721 HARGROVE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27616
LICENSURE #: F-1217
RELIMINARI
DRAWING
NOT FOR
)NSTRUCTIO
ALL CONSTRUCTION PER DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
SPECIFICATIONS, CODES AND MANUALS.
VERIFY PHASING AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION.
PHASING ON PRINT IS BASED ON RECORDS.
PRELIMINARY DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS DESIGN
BASED ON 25% PLANS. THIS PRELIMINARY
DESIGN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION, SCOPE
CHANGES, FINAL PLAN CHANGES,
COORDINATION WITH OTHER UTILITIES, ETC.
f CONSERVATION EASEMENT
NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE HABITAT FOUNDATION
MARK T. SCHOLER
DB 1408 PG 452
DB 1489 PG 253
DB 1572 PG 534
PB 9 PG 356
ti
LLC
0
0
O
O+I
I�
CA
N LO
la— W
to LU
I LU
W LU
Z
J
V
a
i
/t

LEGEND
INSTALL (RED)
REMOVE (GREEN)
EXISTING TO REMAIN (BLUE)
ABANDON (ORANGE)
TEMPORARY (YELLOW)
PERMANENT UTILITIES EASEMENT
AERIAL UTILITIES EASEMENT
TYPICAL DE R/W EASEMENTS
30 FT R/W F 10 FT
10 ]FT
15 FT
15 FT 15 FT
20 FT R/W
GUYING �1111 FT 10 FT
EASEMENT y
0 FT 0 FT
11 5 FT {
OVERHEAD UNDERGROUND
R/W R/W
QUSP:
SAFETYFIrst
RECLOSER:
USP: BREAKER:
SUBSTATION:
°�°`EFO�
Safety Reminders / Adverse Conditions
WZS: Remember "Your Circle of Safety"
WZS: HEAVY TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA
WZS:
?: FLAGGERS NEEDED
USP:
ENERGY.
?:
p PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY
0. ACTIVE CARING
USP:
S4FE�
?
WZS:
0. HAZARD RECOGNITION
USP:
i•
WZS:
REMEMBER: Work zone area conditions may have changed for this job! Everyone is responsible for verifying the above safety information is correct prior to any work being performed each day. Aw
ALL TFOs ON THIS SHEET
ARE IN A HFZ
7--
0
0
LAND AGENT & VEGETATION MANAGEMENT
OPS CENTER:
RESP. CENTER - ENG:TREE CLEARING:ROW:
ACTIVITY - ENG: E TREE CLEARING: I ROW: E
Pr LKE
ENGINEERING
4721 HARGROVE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27616
LICENSURE #: F-1217
RELIMINARI
DRAWING
NOT FOR
)NSTRUCTIO
ALL CONSTRUCTION PER DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS -
SPECIFICATIONS, CODES AND MANUALS.
VERIFY PHASING AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION.
PHASING ON PRINT IS BASED ON RECORDS.
PRELIMINARY DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS DESIGN
BASED ON 25% PLANS. THIS PRELIMINARY
DESIGN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION, SCOPE
CHANGES, FINAL PLAN CHANGES,
COORDINATION WITH OTHER UTILITIES, ETC.
3
WOODY MAE F ARMS. L L C
DB 1153 PG 132
OB 1816 PG 689
PB 6 PG 276
s wL 11-WL
�►• �• �• � � � � � � � � � � � � � � fit. � � � � � � � � � �• � � - � - �
� � � � � �� ��• �,�' �,� �� �� �� �' �,�' �,� fit. � � � � � � � � �. �-�--�-�-�-�-T-r
AP�
.I.
Nilip AL
41�
,, y T t'�E PLd�'UF� 4 �� P�Iot
UF��� lE
PUE �� �� �yy �i yy yy yy �c ]�p�
y rk
• - — — --- — — ,n, —TI
T
.1r� �I' - - ♦ ♦ ♦� �/ f �.��• - �-���.
- .�•T�► - -1 v4 �� �� ♦,♦ �'4 .!Y 1�♦ �♦ ♦4 ♦♦ �♦ �♦1/11 ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦�. ►♦ 1♦ ♦♦sr♦- .:►11!►♦♦♦♦♦♦�11111�t�O.i1r►♦♦♦♦11111♦♦♦♦♦♦♦1111111/11/11�IrS�►!��tz ♦?.����►�♦•►�.►.
C ��♦w:,,.t.i . - .- �� �♦ ♦♦'�1♦♦ �1♦ !►�/w.•Or.�►rw•A�.,�N�e 1p. ���0. �.�1� 1♦�111 ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦1 11 ♦1v ♦v- :�, .L �r-
�.����� t ♦� 1♦ ♦1 1♦ ♦♦♦� p♦ ,.►. w. �► �, - • ► v �* h+ p♦►� 11 F.� ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦� 9♦♦♦♦♦♦1111111♦♦♦♦♦♦♦11♦♦111♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦11111�1/111/11111i��r. �Ei►�11/1�11/11♦
.��-----������rdi ►�1�.�1�4 ffi M T4 _�_A�..� `► A: ' �i...�1�..1��►1�.����i��1���1��.♦��1��1�.�_1� . �. �. _.Ii �►�11►,.�1...�1��i_1�♦i_1�1�_1�1��.v... ✓e� s ��1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1A.1�1�1�1�1�1�1.1.�1.1.��1.A� _ .Ao� �e1.�A.1.1.1.�. -l.�w�����1�1�1�1�1�1.1.1.►.1.1�1�1�1�1
=T_
1 C�"xE
y 14RIDGE 34 y �`
SO
PR -T--� -� �------T
F
f— — -F D .OAU — — -' �'M/L6 - * r * — * y ....r y, - �, y � �E _7�•4 — - — — — — — — ——
t!) iY T 7 _ _
-� sue•= - - may- �sAt- 4L '� --'�I -
•'�
�B— —
Y.
Z ss*1 � � s* �" �F� � � P��� �� �� �� �►'� � �� �� �� �� �� � �► � �,�
1:5Wj1rMPY. ~
Ewa �� ��` R ���`�� �� �� ��` ��' �.�` �� �� �� �� �,�
V
AL AL AL tits
yo
yo
yo
yo
�' �►' �' �( - . - � v_ �c wit �1 � y r11 �. . - :� - - j. �. j - ar-�'- af_ L
M � � y � �. � � e� �l � � y �' ,M �� 4 '� -y-�-ems a - e�
4
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
NORTH CAROLINA HABITAT FOUNDATION
MARK T. SCHOLER
Les on 01-12-23. DSV DB 1408 PG 452
Les on 11-17-22. DSV DB 1489 PG 253
OB 1572 PG 534
proposed water and sewer lines on 07-13-22. DSV PB 9 PG 356
1
Up

APPENDIX D

ti
h
See
Sheet
9 A For
Index of Sheets
See
Sheet
I For
Conventional Flan Sheet Symbols
See
Sheets
RW- 9
Thru RW-? For RW Flan Sheets
I :1�
Cr
ry - - -- --
BEGIN PROJECT
B-492 6
0
i 55 , i ti� Y
I eoee 20 of 8 0: /
A 1 �
Seth
'Vest / r
I I �
1804
IL
PROJECT
L —7926
r, fj
END
' ► B-4
in
�L�a��tin9
1L6iM!►�MOIf�p1AVj1�7
551
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
LEIVOIR
COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO.20 AND BRIDGE NO.34 ON NC 55
OVER THE NEUSE RIVER
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURES
DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SUPERELEVATION.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
B-492 6
1
STATE PROJ. NO.
F. A. PROJ. NO.
DESCRIPTION
40163.1.2
WA
PE
40163.2.1
WA
P W & UTILITIES
40163.3.1
WA
CONST.
� et
2
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the Of f ice of e HYDRA ULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH MEW , Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
77
ADT 2020 = 3020 Fax:[phone]
50 25 0 50 100 License:
C-29 7
License: C-2197 0
ADT2040 = 3900 Engineering & Construction, Inc.
K = 9 % LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4926 = 0.387 MILES 2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PLANS D = 60 % LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4926 = 0.143 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4926 = 0.530 MILES RAJIT RAMKUMAR PE P.E.
50 25 0 50 100 T = 8 % * RIGHT OF WAY DATE: PROJECT ENGINEER ' SIGNATURE: �
ROADWAY DESIGN
V = 60 MPH SEPTEMBER 16, 2022
DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE ENGI1EER �PR FILE (HORIZONTAL) TTST _ 3/DUAL _ 5/�Q
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER 0P
10 5 0 10 20 F U N C CLASS = LETTI11lG DATE:
MAJOR COLLECTOR SEPTEMBER 19, 2023 CASEY K. WHITLEY, PE, PLS
PROFILE (VERTICAL) "REGIONAL TIER" NCDOT CONTACT P.E.
SIGNATURE.

Note: Not to Scale
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY:
St t a L' ----- -----
e ine
County Line
Township Line
n
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
(EIP)
EIP
Computed Property Corner
X
Existing Concrete
Monument (ECM)
El
ECM
Parcel/Sequence
Number
@
Existing Fence Line
—x x x-
Proposed Woven
Wire Fence
Proposed Chain
Link Fence
El
Proposed Barbed
Wire Fence
E' t' W tl d
B d
----9JLB----
xis a o ing aun ary
Proposed Wetland Boundary
WLB
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
EPB
Existing Historic Property Boundary
HPB
Known Contamination Area: Soil
- S � S -
Potential Contamination Area: Soil
- S �v S -
Known Contamination Area: Water"'
-
Potential Contamination Area: Water
- W w-
Contaminated Site: Known or Potential
�' ❑
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
❑
Sign
Well
W W
Small Mine
Foundation
0
Area Outline
Cemetery
F fi
Building
School
❑�
Church
Dam
HYDROLOGY:
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
❑
Jurisdictional Stream
is
Buffer Zone 1
Bz
Buffer Zone 2
Bz 2
Flow Arrow
-
Disappearing Stream
-
Spring ❑❑- �_
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
< FLOW
False Sump
ST1t1TllJ OF NORTH ORTH C AROLI1 Y A9 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge -
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
CSX TRANSPORTATION Woods Line
❑ Orchard 0 0 0 0
MILEPOST 35
❑ Vineyard Vineyard
SWITCH
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
RIGHT OF WAY & PROJECT CONTROL:
Primary Horiz Control Point ❑
Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Vertical Benchmark
Existing Right of Way Monument ❑
Proposed Right of Way Monument
(Rebar and Cap)
Proposed Right of Way Monument
(Concrete)
Existing Permanent Easement Monument
❑
Proposed Permanent Easement Monument
0
(Rebar and Cap)
Existing C/A Monument
❑❑
Proposed C/A Monument (Rebar and Cap)
Proposed C/A Monument (Concrete)
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line
R
Existing Control of Access Line
'C
\A,
Proposed Control of Access Line
Proposed ROW and CA Line
ca
Existing Easement Line
E
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement-
E
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement
TDE
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement
PDE
Proposed Permanent Drainage/Utility Easement
DUE
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement
PUE
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement
TUE
Proposed Aerial Utility Easement
AUE
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb —
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut -
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill -
Proposed Curb Ramp
Existing Metal Guardrail
Proposed Guardrail
Existing Cable Guiderail
Proposed Cable Guiderail
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal
VEGETATION. -
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge
C
F
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert CONC
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - CONC WW
MINOR:
Head and End Wall CONC HW
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
>-------
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
❑CB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
OO
Storm Sewer
S
UTILITIES. -
SUE - Subsurface Utility Engineering
LOS - Level of Service - AAC or D
(Accuracy)
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
b
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
❑
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
�=
U/G Power Line Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
m
U/G Power Line (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -P- -
U/G Power Line (SUE - LOS C)*
- -P- -
U/G Power Line (SUE - LOS D)*
P
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
Telephone Manhole
Telephone Pedestal
Telephone Cell Tower
U/G Telephone Cable Hand
Hole
U/G Telephone Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
U/G Telephone Cable (SUE
- LOS B)*
U/G Telephone Cable (SUE
- LOS C)*
U/G Telephone Cable (SUE
- LOS D)*
U/G Telephone Conduit (SUE
- LOS B)* -
U/G Telephone Conduit (SUE
- LOS C)* -
U/G Telephone Conduit (SUE
- LOS D)* -
U/G Fiber Optics Cable (SUE
- LOS B)*
U/G Fiber Optics Cable (SUE
- LOS C)*
U/G Fiber Optics Cable (SUE
- LOS D)*
T
T
- - - -TC- - -
-TC- -
TC
-T FO- - -
-T FO- - -
T FO
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
o
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
❑
U/G Water Line Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
m
U/G Water Line (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -W- - - -
U/G Water Line (SUE - LOS C)*
- -W- -
U/G Water Line (SUE - LOS D)*
W
Above Ground Water Line
A/G Water
TV:
TV Pedestal
❑
TV Tower
❑
U/G TV Cable Hand Hole
HH
U/G TV Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
m
U/G TV Cable (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -TV- - - -
U/G TV Cable (SUE - LOS C)*
- -TV- -
U/G TV Cable (SUE - LOS D)*
TV
U/G Fiber Optic Cable (SUE - LOS B)* -
- - -TV FO- - -
U/G Fiber Optic Cable (SUE - LOS C)*
- -TV FO-
U/G Fiber Optic Cable (SUE - LOS D)*
TV FO
GAS:
Gas Valve
❑
Gas Meter
❑
U/G Gas Line Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
m
U/G Gas Line (SUE - LOS B)*
--- -°- - --
U/G Gas Line (SUE - LOS C)*
- -°- -
U/G Gas Line (SUE - LOS D)*
°
Above Ground Gas Line
A/G Gas
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
OO
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
SS
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
A/G Sanitary Sewer
SS Force Main Line Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
m
SS Force Main Line (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -FSS- - - -
SS Force Main Line (SUE - LOS C)*
- -FSS- -
SS Force Main Line (SUE - LOS D)*
FSS
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
❑
Utility Located Object
❑
Utility Traffic Signal Box
❑S
Utility Unknown U/G Line (SUE - LOS B)*
1UTL
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
u
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
0
Geoenvironmental Boring
Abandoned According to Utility Records
AATUR
End of Information
E.O.I.

Q
Co
N
cl-
VAR. (SEE PLANS
Lu Z 2'-4
U-
� PAVED
O
0 J SHOULDER 2:1
LU OW
p > C2 R
w
~ .02
PAVEMENT
SCHEDULE
C'1
PROP.
APPROX. 1%2" ASPHALT CONCRETE
SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B
J
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 165 LBS. PER
SQ. YD.
PROP. 6" AGGREGRATE BASE COURSE.
C2
PROP.
APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE
SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B,
R
PROP. CONCRETE SHOULDER BERM GUTTER.
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 165 LBS. PER
SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS.
PROP.
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE
SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B,
C 3
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER
SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO
T
EARTH MATERIAL.
BE PLACED
IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED
1%2" IN DEPTH.
D1
PROP.
APPROX. 21/2" ASPHALT CONCRETE
INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE I19.00,
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT.
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 285 LBS. PER
SQ. YD.
PROP.
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE
INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE I19.00,
D 2
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER
SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO
V
VARIABLE DEPTH MILLING (0" TO 1.5").
BE PLACED
IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN
2%2" OR GREATER
THAN
4" IN DEPTH.
E1
PROP.
APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE
BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.00,
W
VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (SEE STANDARD WEDGING DETAIL).
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER
SQ. YD.
PROP.
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.00,
E 2
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER
SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN 51/2" IN DEPTH.
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
3'
-OFFSET BLOCK
IIPOST
MATTING FOR
EROSION CONTROL
UT
E 1 SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
(STANDARD 846.01)
DETAIL SHOWING SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
USE WITH TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 AND 2
(SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS)
3"
MIN,
J PZ�c-
o
SG
I V W/G R
VAR.
4' TO
FDPS
,.02
D1
E1
Ct EXISTING n� A n� c SURVEY
uetail showing Method Vt Wedging
12'
.09
VAR.
0.2' GRADE
TO POINT
0.4' 1 C2. �W, iC1)
.02
GRADE TO THIS LINE
�E -L- NC 55
- -
----- - - - - --
9.5" U
VAR. 2 3.6' TC
0'
12'
9.5
W
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
VAR.
0.2'
TO
2 4'
C2
11' W/G R
VAR.
TO 8'
FDPS
.02,
(Ej) LD1)CT)
GRADE TO THIS LINE
INSET A
LU 11'
u- Z 8'
O :5 FDPS
W J
0 W
C2 p >
W�
. 02 , .02 , .08
SFF I'q
9.5„ D 1
El T CT,O
GRADE TO THIS LINE -
USE INSET A WITH TYPICAL SECTIONS NO. 1 AND 2
-L-
STA. 16 + 75.00
TO
STA. 20 + 30.00 LT.
-L-
STA. 21 + 2 9.2 9
TO
STA. 2 2 + 79.2 9 LT.
-L-
STA. 28 + 19.29
TO
STA. 33 + 92.50 LT.
-L-
STA. 36 + 07.50
TO
STA. 41 + 57.50 LT.
-L-
STA. 16 + 45.71
TO
STA. 22 + 70.71 RT.
-L-
STA. 28 + 10.71
TO
STA. 33 + 92.50 RT.
-L-
STA. 36 + 07.50
TO
STA. 40 + 95.00 RT.
NOTE:
GUARDRAIL
TRANSITIONS WITH A 50:1
TAPER TO
MATCH BRIDGE OFFSETS.
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 AS FOLLOWS
-L- STA 15 + 00.00 TO STA 17 + 00.00
-L- STA. 38 + 96.35 TO STA. 42 + 00.00
NOTE: RESURFACING/MILLING REQUIRED FROM -L- STA. 42 + 00.00 TO STA. 43 + 00.00
TO ACCOMMODATE ADVERSE CROWN. (SEE SUPER ON PLAN VIEW)
o�
NOTE: NC 55 IS DESIGNATED AS BICYCLE ROUTE 40 (LENOIR COUNTY LOOP ROUTE).

C
C
C
C
C
CY
CF-
'-4
SSG
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
B —4926
ROADWAY DESIGN
-L- NC 55 ENGINEER
8' 12' 12' 8'
I V W/G R
4' TO 8'
FDPS
.02
T
EXISTING GROUND
2—BAR
METAL RAIL
GRADE
C2 POINT
.02
.02
C2
'�) �E1 lD1 9.5 El
GRADE TO THIS LINE �
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
4'
ey
� -D RV-
11' W/GR
4' TO 8'
FDPS
.02,
T
IFFk, �R
SF�ri
O
SHEET NO.
2A-2
PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
w SAM1
Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel:[phone]
ti 3
Fax:[phone]
'-
License: C-2197
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
Cl I 1 %2" TYPE S9 .5B
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 AS FOLLOWS
—L— STA. 17+00.00 TO STA. 22+60.68 (BEGIN APPROACH SLAB BRIDGE 20) C2
—L— STA. 28 + 29.14 (END APPROACH SLAB BRIDGE 20) TO STA. 33 + 78.33 (BEGIN APPROACH SLAB BRIDGE 34)
—L— STA. 36 + 21.67 (END APPROACH SLAB BRIDGE 34) TO STA. 38 + 96.35
C3
D1
2VAR. 12' TO 16' 4'
7' GRADE W/G R D2
POINT
E1
.08 ,.02 .02, .08
J �6" \
GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
3" TYPE S9.513
VAR. TYPE S9.513
2%2" TYPE I19.00
VAR. TYPE I19.00
4" TYPE B25.00
E 2 I VAR. TYPE B25 . OC
EXISTING GROUND
J
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 AS FOLLOWS
—DRV— STA 10 + 00.00 TO STA 12 + 18.36
NOTE: PAVE DRIVE FROM —DRV— STA 12 + 15.00 TO STA 12 + 29.88
6" AGGREGRATE BASE COURSE.
R I SHOULDER BERM GUTTER.
T I EARTH MATERIAL.
U I EXISTING PAVEMENT
-L- NC 55
V VAR. DEPTH MILLING
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4
2—BAR
METAL RAIL
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4 AS FOLLOWS
—L— STA. 22 + 75.00 (BEGIN BRIDGE 20) TO STA. 28 + 15.00 (END BRIDGE 20)
W I VAR. DEPTH WEDGING
a_

C
C
C
C
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
B -4926
ROADWAY DESIGN
31 ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
2A -3
PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER
2-BAR
METAL RAIL
CE -L- NC 55
:1A/
2-BAR
METAL RAIL
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
w
1 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel:[phone]
ti 3
Fax:[phone]
License: C-2197
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
Cl I 1 %2" TYPE S9.513
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 5 USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.5 AS FOLLOWS C2 3" TYPE S9.513
-L- STA. 33 + 92.50 (BEGIN BRIDGE 34) TO STA. 36 + 07.50 (END BRIDGE 34)
INCIDENTAL MILLING DETAIL
37.5'
*SEE NOTES
MILLING
0 TO 1.5" DEPTH
oz
zo
W i--i
H
DC C�
z� V C1 PROPP.SURFACE
" z COURSE
(1.5
)
W O
_ m v
1.5
- - - J
EXIST. PAVEMENT
-L- STA. 15 + 00.00 TO STA. 15 + 37.50
-L- STA. 42 + 62.50 TO STA. 43 + 00.00
*NOTES: MIRROR FOR END OF CONSTRUCTION
MILL AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
C 3 I VAR. TYPE S9.513
D1 I 2�/2" TYPE I19.00
D 2 I VAR. TYPE I19.00
E1 I 4" TYPE B25.00
E 2 I VAR. TYPE B25.00
J I 6" AGGREGRATE BASE COURSE.
R I SHOULDER BERM GUTTER.
T I EARTH MATERIAL.
U I EXISTING PAVEMENT
V I VAR. DEPTH MILLING
W I VAR. DEPTH WEDGING
a.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
AYS
CT
m
E
It
SUMMARY OF EARTHWORK
IN CUBIC YARDS
STATION
STATION
UNCL.
EXCAV.
UNDERCUT
EMBANK.
+ /o
BORROW
WASTE
PHASE I
SUMMARY NO. 1 (RT.)
-L- STA. 15 + 00.00
-L- STA. 22 + 75.00 (BB)
14
990
13,395
13,381
990
TOTAL SUMMARY NO. 1
14
990
13,395
13,381
990
SUMMARY NO.2 (RT.)
-L- STA. 28+15.00 (EB)
-L- STA. 33+92.50 (BB)
0
2,200
27,239
27,239
2,200
TOTAL SUMMARY NO. 2
0
2,200
27,239
27,239
2,200
SUMMARY NO.3 (RT.)
-L- STA. 36+07.50 (EB)
-L- STA. 43+00.00
26
1,500
7,360
7,334
0
TOTAL SUMMARY NO. 3
26
1,500
7,360
7,334
0
PHASE II
SUMMARY NO.4 (LT.)
-L- STA. 15 + 00.00
-L- STA. 22 + 75.00 (BB)
7,004
1,329
0
5,675
-DRV- STA. 11+58.04
-DRV- STA. 12+29.88
726
336
0
390
TOTAL SUMMARY NO. 4
7,730
1,665
0
6,065
SUMMARY NO.5 (LT.)
-L- STA. 28 + 15.00 (EB)
-L- STA. 33 + 92.50 (BB)
10,779
91
0
10,688
TOTAL SUMMARY NO. 5
10,779
91
0
10,688
SUMMARY NO. 6 (LT.)
-L- STA. 36 + 0 7.5 0 (EB)
-L- STA. 43 + 00.00
5,290
414
0
4,876
TOTAL SUMMARY NO. 6
5,290
414
0
4,876
SUMMARY TOTALS
23,839
41690
50,164
47,954
26,319
WASTE IN LIEU OF BORROW
GRADE POINT UNDERCUT
100
100
UNDERCUT CONTINGENCY
500
500
SHOULDER MATERIAL
638
638
PROJECT TOTALS
23,839
51290
50,802
48,592
26,919
EST. 5% TO REPLACE TOP SOIL ON BORROW PIT
2,430
GRAND TOTALS
23,839
51290
50,802
51,022
26,919
SAY
24,500
51,200
NOTE: UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION - ACCEPTABLE, BUT NOT TO BE USED IN TOP 3' OF EMBANKMENT OR BACKFILL:
-L- STA. 33 + 75 TO STA. 34 + 25 LT./RT.
-L- STA. 37 + 25 TO STA. 39 + 25 LT./RT.
TOTAL QUANTITY = 600 CY
DDE = 487 CY
SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL = 7,030 CY
GEOTEXTILE FOR SOIL STABILIZATION = 7,230 SY
ROCK PLATING = 13,730 SY
CLASS IV SUBGRADE STABILIZATION = 200 TONS
SHALLOW UNDERCUT = 100 CY
Earthwork quantities are calculated by SEPI Engineering.
These earthwork quantities are based in part on subsurface data
provided by the Wood engineering group.
Note: Approximate quantities only. Unclassified Excavation, Borrow Excavation,
Fine Grading, Clearing and Grubbing, Removal of Existing Pavement
will be paid for at the contract lump sum price for "Grading."

CT
COMPUTED BY: DWG DATE: 6Q449
CHECKED BY: DATE: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
"N" = DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF LANE TO FACE OF GUARDRAIL.
TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH = DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE TO SHOULDER BREAK POINT.
FLARE LENGTH = DISTANCE FROM LAST SECTION OF PARALLEL GUARDRAIL TO END OF GUARDRAIL.
W = TOTAL WIDTH OF FLARE FROM BEGINNING OF TAPER TO END OF GUARDRAIL. GUARDRAIL S UMMAR Y
G = GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
NG = NON -GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B -4926
3B -2
1 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
is
g'
Tel:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
License: C-2197
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
SURVEY
LINE
BEG. STA.
END STA.
LOCATION
LENGTH
WARRANT POINT
"N"
DIST.
FROM
E.O.L.
TOTAL
SHOUL.
WIDTH
FLARE LENGTH
W
ANCHORS
IMPACT
ATTENUATOR
TYPE 350
SINGLE
FACED
GUARDRAIL
REMOVE
EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
REMOVE
AND
STOCKPILE
EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
REMARKS
STRAIGHT
SHOP
CURVED
DOUBLE
FACED
APPROACH
END
TRAILING
END
APPROACH
END
TRAILING
END
APPROACH
END
TRAILING
END
GREU
TL-3
GREU
TL-2
_
EA
G
NG
-L-
16 + 75.00
20 + 30.00
LT
355.00'
16 + 75.00
8'
11'
50'
1'
1
-L-
20+30.00
20+45.35
LT
25.0'
4'
7'
-L-
21+29.29
22+79.29
LT
150.00
21+29.29
8'
11'
50'
1'
1
1
-L-
28+19.29
33+92.50
LT
573.21'
8'
11'
2
-L-
36 + 07.50
41 + 57.50
LT
550.00'
41 + 57.50
8'
11'
50'
1'
1
1
-L-
16 + 45.44
22 + 70.44
RT
625.00'
16 + 45.44
8'
11'
50'
1'
1
1
-L-
28 + 10.44
33 + 92.50
RT
582.06'
8'
11'
2
-L-
36 + 07.50
40 + 95.00
RT
487.50'
40 + 95.00
8'
11'
50'
1'
1
1
-DRV-
10 + 00.00
12 + 13.00
RT
213.00'
4'
7'
1
-L-
21 +45.23
22 +96.44
LT
151.21'
-L-
28+11.96
34+25.31
LT
613.34'
-L-
35 + 94.16
41 + 74.55
LT
580.39'
-L-
20+25.38
22+98.61
RT
273.23'
-L-
28+10.45
34+25.77
RT
615.32'
-L-
35 + 94.34
37 + 48.64
RT
154.30'
SUBTOTAL
3535.77'
25.0'
5
1
8
2387.79'
LESS ANCHOR DEDUCTION
GREU TL-3, 5 @ 50' =
250.00'
GREU TL-2, 1 @ 25' =
25.00'
TYPE -III, 8 @ 18.75' =
150.00'
TOTAL
3110.77'
25.0'
5
1
8
2387.79'
ADDITIONAL GUARDRAIL POSTS = 20 EACH
SAY
3125.00'
25.0'
5
1
8
2400.00'
ASPHALT PAVEMENT REMOVAL S UMMAR Y
SURVEY
LINE
STATION
STATION
LOCATION
LT/RT/CL
SQUARE
YARDS
-L-
17 + 00.00
22 + 98.61
LT
1584.25
-L-
28+10.45
34+25.77
LT
1622.20
-L-
35 + 94.34
40 + 16.52
LT
847.29
TOTALS
4053.74
SAY
4,100
SHO ULDER BERM
GUTTER S UMMARY
SURVEY
LINE
STATION
STATION
LENGTH
-L- LT.
33 + 21.00
33 + 78.33
57.33
-L- LT.
36 + 21.67
39 + 21.00
299.33
-L- RT.
16 + 96.00
22 + 57.07
561.07
-L- RT.
28 + 25.07
33 + 00.00
474.93
-L- RT.
39 + 44.00
40 + 44.00
100.00
TOTALS
1,492.66
SAY
1,500
am

c9
7f
ED
Co
�u
C�
:L
®U
COMPUTED BY: DWG DATE: 7/5A9 PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
CHECKED BY: AMH DATE: 5n021 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA B-4926 3D-1
DIVISION SII ON OF HIGHWAYS
NOTE: Invert Elevations are for Bid Purposes only and shall not be used for project construction stakeout.
See "Standard Specifications For Roads and Structures, Section 300-5". S UB REGIONAL & REGIONAL
LIST OF PIPES, END WALLS, ETC. (FOR PIPES 48" & UNDER)
STATION
V
O
J
z
O
~
a
U
O
O
Z
j
U
N
O
a
>
W
"'
0-
O
O
a
J
LU
w
>
Z
O
a
IIIJ
LU
w
>
Z
-
U
d
O
,
DRAINAGE PIPE
(RCP, CSP, CARP, HDPE, or PVC)
C.S. PIPE
R.C. PIPE
(CLASS III)
R.C. PIPE
(CLASS IV)
N
g
V
w
d
CJ
w
�_
Z
o
o
N
Ln
w
�
_Z
o
o
to
-
°r
ENDWALLS
J
Q OU c0
N cD N � ca
Z ae O J OU
Z U " Zn M
O O `" +
`� O Z
~ Q
a
O
N
p
L
w
O
o
o
m
CJ
FRAME, GRATES
AND HOOD
STANDARD 840.03
a
W Z Z
oc 0 0
Z v~-i U
O Z N
U
ry
0
°0
o
"'
p
aro
00
o
ti
�
Ln
o
o
cn
"6
0`
0
00
o
N
V'
O
=
~
3
W
�
g
vi
Z
P
p
Z
3
O
m
LU
O
z
�
Z
>
O
�
LU
GC
�
ABBREVIATIONS
C.B. CATCH BASIN
N.D.I. NARROW DROP INLET
D.I. DROP INLET
G.D.I. GRATED DROP INLET
G.D.I. (N.S.) GRATED DROP INLET
(NARROW SLOT)
J.B. JUNCTION BOX
M.H. MANHOLE
T.B.D.I. TRAFFIC BEARING DROP INLET
T.B.J.B. TRAFFIC BEARING JUNCTION BOX
STD. 838.01,
STD. 838.11
OR
STD. 838.80
(UNLESS
NOTED
OTHERWISE)00
o
`n
_
b
=
LLJ
�
�
*IN'
FT.
�
m
=
U
v
J
Z
o
SIZE
12"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
d
w
w
>
Z
O
a
U
w
j
Z
O
a
U
w
Z
O
w
=
w
Z
O
12"
15"
18"
24"
36"
42"
48"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
12"
15"
181,
24"
30'
36"
42"
48"
CU. YDS.
A
B
o
H
o
>
O
Q
Q
THICKNESS
OR GAUGE
00
l.L
00
o
o
o
o
0
0
U
oe
vi
U
TYPE OF GRATE
REMARKS
E
F
G
-L- STA. 17+01
RT.
0401
25.7
22.9
1
1
1
04010402
22.9
22.7
20
-L- STA. 17+25
RT.
0402
25.9
22.7
1
1
1
0402
0403
22.7
16.4
24
X
2
-L- STA. 22 + 50
RT.
0404
39.3
36.5
1
1
1
0404
0405
36.5
16.8
48
X
2
-L- STA. 28+35
RT.
0406
40.3
37.5
1
1
1
0406
0407
37.5
16.9
52
X
2
-L- STA. 23+34
LT.
0408
16.3
15.9
20
-L- STA. 31 + 50
RT.
0513
31.6
28.8
1
1
1
0513
0514
28.8
27.5
116
-L- STA. 32 + 67
RT.
0514
30.3
27.5
1
1
1
0514
0501
27.5
27.3
24
-L- STA. 32 + 95
RT.
0501
30.1
27.3
1
1
1
05010502
27.3
13.5
36
X
2
-L- STA. 33 + 73
LT.
0503
29.2
26.4
1
1
1
0503
0504
26.4
14.1
36
X
2
-L- STA. 36+26
LT.
0505
28.2
25.5
1
1
1
0505
0506
25.5
16.0
32
X
2
-L- STA. 38+13
LT.
0509
27.2
24.5
1
1
1
0509
0510
24.5
13.5
32
X
2
-L- STA. 39 + 75
RT.
0508
28.0
25.2
1
1
1
0508
0511
25.2
25.0
24
-L- STA. 39+48
RT.
0511
28.1
25.0
1
1
1
0511
0512
25.0
13.7
32
X
2
-L- STA. 33 + 11.63
LT.
24
L- STA. 34+07.29
LT&RT
28
-L- STA. 34 + 09.43
LT.
16
-L- STA. 36 +11.43
LT.
20
-L- STA. 36 + 12.66
LT.
20
PROJECT TOTALS
292
184
20
12
7
5
12
16
108

0-
S UMMAR Y OF AGGREGATE S UB GRADES TABILIZA TION
LINE
STATION
STATION
AGGREGATE
A TYPE*
ASTzv
AGGREGATE
THICKNESS
INCHES
for
ASU(
SHALLOW
UNDERCUT
CY
CLASS IV
SUBGRADE
STABILIZATION
TONS
GEOTEXTILE
FOR SOIL
STABILIZATION
SY
STABILIZER
AGGREGATE
TONS
CLASS IV
AGGREGATE
STABILIZATION
TONS
CONTINGENCY
ASU(1)
1 12
100
1 200
500
TOTAL CY/fONS/SY:
1 100
1 200**
500**
*ASU(1/2) = AGGREGATE SUBGRADE (Type 1 or 2)
*AST = AGGREGATE STABILIZATION
**TOTAL TONS OF "CLASS IV SUBGRADE STABILIZATION" AND TOTAL SQUARE YARDS OF "GEOTEXTILE FOR SOIL STABILIZATION" ARE ONLY
THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES FOR ASU(1/2YAST AND MAY ONLY REPRESENT A PORTION OF THE SUBGRADE STABILIZATION AND GEOTEXTILE
QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE ITEM SHEETS OF THE PROPOSAL.
S UMMAR Y OF SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE
LINE
STATION
STATION
LOCATION
LT/RT/C L
DRAIN TYPE*
U D/BD/S D
LF
—L—
16 + 45
23 + 05
RT
U D
660
—L—
28+25
33+95
RT
UD
570
—L—
36 + 05
40 + 75
RT
U D
470
CONTINGENCY
SD
300
SUBTOTAL:
2,000
TOTAL LF:
2,000
*UD = UNDERDRAIN
*BD = BLIND DRAIN
*SD = SUBSURFACE DRAIN
S UMMAR Y OF BRIDGE WAITING PERIODS
Bridge Description
End Bent/
Bent No.
MONTHS
Bridge No. 20 over Neuse River
EB 1
2
Bridge No. 20 over Neuse River
EB 2
1
Bridge No. 34 over Neuse River Overflow
EB 1
3
Bridge No. 34 over Neuse River Overflow
EB 2
2
S UMMAR Y OF ROCK PLATING
LINE
Be inning
tope�
(H vl
Approx.
Station
Ending
Slope�
(H:V)
Approx.
Station
Location
LT/RT
Rock
Plating
Detail No.
1/2/3/4
Riprap
Class*
1/Zg
Rock
Plating
SY g
—L—
2:1
15+25
2:1
15+75
RT
2
2
130
—L—
2:1
16 + 25
2:1
22 + 56
RT
2
2
2,160
—L—
2:1
17+25
2:1
20+35
LT
2
2
1,010
—L—
2:1
20 + 80
2:1
22 + 65
LT
2
2
940
—L—
2:1
28 + 24
2:1
33 + 78
RT
2
2
2,760
—L—
2:1
28 + 34
2:1
33 + 78
LT
2
2
2,630
—L—
2:1
36+22
2:1
41+25
RT
2
2
1,770
—L—
2:1
36 + 22
2:1
41 + 75
LT
2
2
2,110
—DRV—
2:1
11 + 75
2:1
12 + 30
RT
2
2
220
TOTAL SY:
1 13,730
*Use Class 1, 2, or B riprap it riprap class is not shown for rock plating location.
S UMMAR Y OF
SETTLEMENT GA UGES
Gauge
No.
Line
and
Station
Offset
Distance
FT
Direction
LT/RT
1
—L— 22 + 65
20
RT
2
—L— 33 + 80
20
LT
3
—L— 33 + 80
20
RT
4
—L— 36+20
20
RT
TOTAL GUAGES (EACH):
4

co
c0
N�
CT'
�
cam `
CD
CN O
oCL L,
%U
�'o o-
-L- PT Sta. 22+12.74
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L- STA. 22 + 60.68
TYPE III
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 22 + 75.00
PS - PAVED SHOULDER END BRIDGE
SBG - SHOULDER BERM GUTTER -L- STA. 28+15.
2-BAR METAL RAIL
NOT TO SCALE
Sketch showing Dimensions of Pavement and
Shoulder in Relation to Proposed Bride Width
gOTE: PAVE -DRV- FROM STA. 12 + 15.00 TO STA. 12 + 29.88
_ -y-
a__V_ - -/
v
y/
�_�/
j-1-L - PCC Sta.
+ 01.60 -L-
m 50.00' LT.
�I
�I
C /
TYPE III
END APPROACH SLAB
-L- STA. 2 8 + 2 9.14
+ 02.00 -L- + 12.74 -L-
140.46' LT. 165.00' LT.
o\ -DRV - PT • Sta. 11+38.43 -DRV - PC Sta. 10+52.19
Sa°321 /
N ro 89 + 53.00 -L- _
144.00'LT. _Ts--cW��
160.00' LT�� �E� &E�4L� E CISI�IN �CO�`1 CARE E RIB
- R- P i s fj CAB JTUiNT _fEMN&NTS,�EATII�G�c r C
33.0%_ - A B
-yl ' IyT. &R� AcREYA SPE§Z14 ay JL �
5 0 ' L �c �c � L4TERAi 1-fT-BASE DIWF�
c/ �c2 .0- �c L44 KCic'I' RIP`RAP
1 i15. do, I T. JL + 0 00 -L BE 1 ETAI 4
+98.00 -L- / PANI&EN JL 5&0 ' LT. - - / _
123.00' LT. /� EX AIVA 10�1 �c VE�EASTIN _ C
pc SSE Ev D: TAIL P ET� B[Lbk ejM
+ 08.00 -L- \� � 1 .8 Q � N
108.00' LT.
- �c
RODNEY E. COLE \ �c1 ' 1j.�
DB 574 PG 654 \��� �� ���
DB 1457 PG 804 -DRV - P.T Sta. 9� -
+ 82.00 -L- S 12° 33' 04.2" W-
111.00 LT. + 65.00 -L-
+ 89.00 -L- - _ -
88.00' LT. _ - -
BM 1 86.92' LT.
-BL- STA 10+39 28LT Q _----
N566126 E2447709
ELEV.=24.78' +75.00 -L-
BENCH NAIL SET IN 6" PINE 87.00' LT.
+01.60 +25.00 -L-
75.00' LT.
+ 93.00 -L-
SS \ 54.76' LT.
t� �
J_
� 1c
s�
I I
I I
o.
0. co ,.
0
/ ST 23 6 Bo co
JG 55 _
V
� � @
_ 0O 0' RT.
_V_
� m E
I I
I I
I I
+ 00.00 -L-
50.00' RT.
85.00' RT.
+36.00 -L-
81.64' RT.
98.00' RT.
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4926
-L- STA. 15 + 00.00
DETAIL 3
EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION Proposed
EXCAVATE EXISTING (Not to SCgle) Fill Slope
ROADWAY EMBANKMENT
TO APPROXIMATE NATURAL `L1
GROUND ELEVATION
CL. 'll' RIP RAP
ROCK PLATING
/ Natural _ _ _ \ - 2-FTE�ILE
THICK
Ground
GRADE AWAY FROM Natural
TOE OF FILL +/-0.5% Ground
DENOTES
EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION
QUANTITY= EST. 2 6,800 CY
FROM -L- STA. 17+00 TO STA. 23+25 LT
FROM -L- STA. 27+81 TO STA. 34+27 LT
FROM -L- STA. 35 + 92 TO STA. 40 + 00 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10 + 00 TO STA. 12 + 18 LT
FROM -DRV- STA. 10 + 00 TO STA. 12 + 18 RT
40 2G 1 1'f �
F E�E
SgG �� � 3-+60.00
J 73.00' RT. JL � � I
+ 65.00 -L- _�L GCv- . p, 0 55.00=
I 79.00' RT. StU. 2 +41.88
I\ +35.00-L- +47.00-L- +55.O�L- ��� ����� ��_I
91.00' RT. 50.00' RT.� �c _c �
�c \ 73.00' RT. �y �c
CL 'II' RIP RAP 60.00' R �. _ �
70.00'RT - �� �� �� �cl
�_ �-�IEST.3TON �� �� ��V ��
� � � -3(.90 7 SY GFD GE G�E�`& �Nt WI NINC(- � � � � �/
� _ 0WD& RT. II PBY-14y60 P� 1-65 � �c /
�� ,3.00�RT. ��� ��'� ����
I � BE IN��SBG�
I� _c�sTl�+aq6 RT
t + 74. 0 -L-
�c 7.50'�RT.
8IJFT�tB, SE,,CHAIkNE4I (CHANGE �
�LItjEMkL 11'�RII"RA�P / _
I� �$E E�_ DI&T,4 L -k I /� �y � _ � � \
Y
-L -
Pl Sta 18+59.98
PI Sta 30+02.07
p =
IT 33' 45.4" (RT)
p =
/0. 38' 32.4" (RT)
D =
2° 28' 10.7"
D =
3° 08' 53.2"
L =
7/1.14'
L =
338.05'
T =
358.38"
T =
169.5/'
R
= 2,320.00'
R =
1,820.00'
SE
_ .06
SE
_ .07
RO
= 160"
RO
= 187"
-DRV-
Pl Sta /0 +95.74
P1 Sta 12 +07.18
p =
19° 45' 49.7" (LT)
p =
69° 46' 54.4" (LT )
D =
22.55' 05.9"
D =
190° 59' 09.4"
L =
86.24'
L =
36.54'
T =
43.55'
T =
20.92'
R =
250.00'
R =
30.00'
SE
= SEE PLANS
SE
= SEE PLANS
1 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, INC 27603
_� •-' -
Te1:919.789.9977
ti 3
Fax:[phone]
=
License: C-2197
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
1
mti m�
41
N 77° 54' //.7" W
-DRV - POT Sta. /0 +00.00
CONCRETE REMNANTS
REMOVAL SEE DETAIL
-wLB +75.0� �- -'
�c -1381.0 ' LT:
-YREXISTING POLES J�
BEGIN CL. 'II' RIP RAP END
�c + 66.00 -L-
BENT SLOPE PROTECTION 67 00 L
No mH
� O
�m N
au
k, C?5
co
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
B -4926
R/W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
4
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
STA 22 + 65 LT + 45.00 _L_ 154.00 LT. 3 .00' LT. �-L- PC Sta. 28 +32.5
Qj
152.00' LT. Q o
�c +85.00 -L- END CL. 'Il' RIP RAP END ,
/ BENT SLOPE PROTECTION
�. 99.07' LT. + 46.00 -L- ® STA 28 + 34 LT
EMBANKMENT 138.00' LT. `v 1 +04.00 -L-
EXCAVATION ^' ti 30 04' LT. y
�` 132.00' LT. �
SEE DETAIL 3 EMBANKMENT 146.00' LT.
STANDARD 1-FT, BASE DITCH_ �� EXCAVATION Pt
P E LINE I'�RIP. PSEE tvlcfAP E PUE PUE SEE DETAIL 3
i
CL SS�'I RIP_ R,�P� C I' KIP P� / PA -L-
/-A,
i T �SFfOIJLDI�R �P T S T N�c / 103.75' LT.
�STRU_�TURES W ITE T 9 Y CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
0 DY MA FAR S. LLC
DB II PG 2
y DB 1 6 PG 689
PB 6 PG 276
+ 4.00 L-
W
-L-
T.
-L-
T.
_ -_-3t p
`TAPER DITCH TO A DEPTH REMOVE - STRUCTURES PBAY ITEM 0
__ C ---- -- -- EXISTING BRIDGE
OF 0-FT ON NATURAL GROUND _ _
18" �40 _ PRIOR iO ENTERING WETLAND -W - O >' �� �� `0000
- � T_ L Z T L Z -Z -S- -T
- T I 'i /� +�C �c I i 011
CONCRETE
i I BRIDGE #20
I I I I
-i CL 'I' RIP RAP T -�
C � ,� �� EST. 20 TONS C I- W
EST. 28 SY GFDUA
-71 -T
100 PR
At LLB
F�
I� �'Ng� C $EST /
+0010� - +12 4�-L AP OACR Ali RT _V
75.0 R#. �5 �/ /SBEGIN �L.�I'�R QCD
�c / / -'BEI�T �SL6PE�PI�O E Ot H�
�c + 03G00� - kA�2�+�56 �RT�
/4,9O�R E6T�2 10-M � � �c � � --IV
,1.(0'RT �E�f.�i5 S i�F13 �c
V_ 1bf,
� /
m � �
�_V� ��
m m
NOTE: GUARDRAIL TRANSITIONS WITH A 50:1 TAPER TO MATCH BRIDGE OFFSETS.
- D ETAI L 2
CHANNEL CHANGE
( Not to Scale)
�b►{ Natural
Proposed Ground
Natural _ Fill Slope
Ground d 2•y D
GEOTEXTILE B Min. D=4.0 Ft. Exist. Channel
Max. d=FULL DEPTH OF BACKSLOPE
Type of Liner=EST. 555 TONS B=8.0 Ft.
Class 'II' Rip Rap b=5.0 Ft.
Geotextile = EST. 560 SY
FROM -L- STA. 16 + 10 TO STA. 18 + 43 RT
DETAIL 4
GORE AREA SPECIAL
LATERAL BASE DITCH
(Not to Scale) b
2• o<
-DRV-
Fi-A-
}e' 'v ;\ o 0.5% -L- Fill
d f r D F o Slope
GEOTEX 1LE B Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Max. d = 1.0 Ft.
B=1.0 Ft.
Min. b=2.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= EST. 100 TONS CL 'I' Rip -Rap
Geotextile= EST.150 SY DDE = EST.110 CY
FROM -L- STA. 21 +00 TO STA. 22 +50 LT
i
D ETAI L 5
STANDARD BASE DITCH
Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground �%•� 3•:� Ground /
d D m
Geotextile B Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Max. d = 1.0 Ft.
B =1.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= EST 95 TONS CL 'I' Rip -Rap
Geotextile= EST.140 SY; DDE= EST.143 CY ro
FROM -L- STA. 22 + 50 TO STA. 23 + 90 LT
m
i
- T- -
-L- NC 55
a
DETAIL 7
CONCRETE REMNANTS REMOVAL DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
EXISTING CONCRETE NATURAL GROUND
TO BE REMOVED
DENOTES g:1
EXCAVATION
CL. 'II' RIP RAP
ROCK PLATING
ELEV. =18.0 W/GEOTEXTILE
NATURAL GROUND 2-FT THICK
FROM -L- STA. 21 + 75 TO STA. 22 + 70 LT
--�jillill��
-
J .
BE INSBG @ E 50 ' R-1.
PROACH �jL� �� 770 RTC
I EN CL. 'II',RIP I E�4 i 9. 0�RT �t
BE T SLOPS �228'+�I &T� �C � �T� �izON
�c�E 6VSY6FD,-V-
H _
ti j �+ 2 �
0
r �� ��_V ��-8 �O�R&
���� ��
��
d
I _ -34-
� � �
-_ V � � � �
4
y a' CONSERVATION EASEMENT
NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE HABITAT FOUNDATION
MARK T. SCHOLER
^� DB 1408 PG 452
^� DB 1489 PG 253
DB 1572 PG 534
w PB 9 PG 356
N Ln
Ln �o
ti N
Z
PROVIDE CLASS 'II' RIP RAP ROCK PLATING ON
ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR AS INDICATED
ON THE PLANS. 2-FT THICK TO SHOULDER POINT.
REFER TO STANDARD ROCK PLATING DETAIL SHEET 2G-?
0
SEE SHEET 6 FOR -L- PROFILE
SEE SHEET 7 FOR -DRV- PROFILE
SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS

Ln
Z
0
LU
W
N
CTI
Ln
c9
N�
CT -
NM `
Ni
N __-)�
vo
CD CL L,
%U
� o-
4
N
PS - PAVED SHOULDER
SBG - SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
-L - PC Sto. 36 +'
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 33 + 78.33 -L- STA. 36 + 07.50
2-BAR METAL RAIL
zol
T T T SBG T TYPE III W TYPE III
PS 1 1 TYPE III
� TYPE III 1
-BAR METAL RAIL
DGE END APPROACH SLAB
3 + 92.50 -L- STA. 36 + 21.67
S
-L-
PI Sto 30 +02.07
PI Sto 37 +86.49
PI Sto 40 +56.55
z�s =
/0* 38' 32.4" (RT)
Z� =
8° 30' 06.8" (LT)
Z� =
8° 30' 06.8" (RT)
D =
Y 08' 53.2"
D =
3° 08' 53.2"
D =
Y 08' 53.2"
L =
338.05'
L =
270.06'
L =
270.06'
T =
169.51'
T =
135.28'
T =
135.28'
R =
1,820.00'
R =
1,820.00'
R =
1,820.00'
SE
_ .07
MSE
= SEE PLANS
-SE
= SEE PLANS
RO
= 187'
-DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SUPERELEVATION.
BRIDGE #34: 6" DIAMETER CIRCULAR DECK
DRAINS REQUIRED SPACED 12' O.C.
FROM L STA 34+09 TO STA 36+O1 IT
60AMN
1 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
-' -
Te1:919.789.9977
ti 3
Fax:[phone]
a
License: C-2197
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
V�
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
B -4926
R,W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
5
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
I DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
END RESURFACING/MILLING
- - -L- STA. 43 + 00.00
NOT TO SCALE 3
Sketch showing Dimensions of Pavement and END GRADE
Shoulder in Relation to Proposed Bridge Width WOODY MAE P ARMS, LLc -L- STA. 42 + 00.00
DB 1153 G 132
DB 1816 PG 689
PB 6 PG 276
757 �� �y�WL6 - T WL$- WLB-
�y N�y ,yam �� �� �yTwLe--,�-,�-�-�-� TwL 57
� � � � � N_ � ,yam ,yam ,yam � )���� �� �34-
A��
� � � � � � � � � � � �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �y�51. 1�L ,y � � � � � � 94c.0'LT�, �� �� �� �� �� �� ��- � � 4� /��
ay � �+ 1 0 - ay �y �Q4 �y10�1LT �y ay � ay ,l alqm ,l
�y ,y + (0 �y +�Z0.60 �L- - �y ,y ,y C-L R!P RyA ,y ay � � ,y 110�0 LT�y
�y �y � 3�.00y Lf. �y >y T� Qy +y7 L R9 P SST 2�T0 ,l ,l ,l ,l al ,l
,y �20.�0 yLT.ay �y 9. 1' T. �y ,y T � � � � � � ay � � � � � � - � + 1 7 L� �y �y 78 0�-L -y ,y
,y ay �y 13'S.O� Lyf. ay �y � -y NASA MEN>T -y-YEST�y25'TC>�l �y �y -y � -y � EST 76 OF ,l 8ELT. ay ,y - n�f. �+ ( 0
�y �y E T- Y'�Fgy ,y ,l � � � � �yE AN�I+�ENo-T �y - �y - -y - y �y - y CL %,R* R*P -y -y ay �l 0�`k 0 + I3. -L- �l ,y 0 �l S 62` 54' 39.1" E
+ 0. -L _ � E CC�AVAyTI (N SEX A ATI,� 'I >y �y �y �y ,y ay �L �l -y �i ay �y �y 50�y0 LT.
,y S�f. 2�yTN 0,0-9
/ ,y ,y q ay -y ,y y y � �y �R E ay � �y A �y -y ay I�b BC EG�N �y ,y E AI Ly3 �y �y �y T��6 �Y,y�F� -y �y �y ,,, �y �y �9- 7 7 - ay ay
ay �l G � -y �y ,y f P Of CIt S W LT�y �y � �y � . ,l � � � �y - � �y ay �y � � � � +�l�J ,y �l � ,l �l � � �
� -
,� ��- �� E �dEU 6y PMgIU E�y�' �� 3�.oy =1� ,y ,y �yl
1 Nay G �y �y TEP__y_V_4
O ,y ,y ay ay ,y ay 5 ay3 L ,y ,y
�` �� 3�-+�,y �,y �,y ��y ��y ��� � �� �y�,yam,y�
p � � _¢= ���`� __ �� � � �M�� �A@,_P �Aj �L�B �T,y � Cvy � �C�• , �l - ,�`a ��-� ��� � � _ ,` _ ---�� � � N �` 1` - o
Iv1
� C2E [iRAI �I ITT -
p � PAD Et �T,41L� � ay � �y �� - � SO
�� -
p� 40' ' CONCRETE I $' P _ o a E o NC 55 23.2'BST� o
I RIDGE 34 i «� N fV (V 04 fV
N � �---- _ o o a
4d - -- - - -- � - _ - -- -
- r - T � - T 1�" RCP -IV � � � T � N - - - .,� 50 = r - - -= F
- 2 1 A�0 ---� --- - - L FPR-- ----- -r-�S -
Ln W N - «� h - 2` 4' l'�1C �v10v ' 0 - _ _ 2 G _ _ _� F
SFs�y-S ��
' -
vi - _ -
J ,y
W � ,y � ,y � � �y �
6s.oL-
U-1 �y �y >y ay >y ay �y 5 W �� >y� E aye aye �� �y� ��� � aye ,lam �� ay �� E� -yam �� ,lam .N'R.� �,y �
Z - ,yam �� ,yam �� ,yam �� �B�WS� ,y �� �� ,yam ,yam ,yam ,yam �� �� �� ,yam �� �� �y F� ��,y�i $
- �y �y �y _y ,y ay ,l �y �y EE
5 ay ,y ,l _5 WPM P ,l ,y ,y�y -sy �y ,y ay ,L ay ,y ,y ,y >y ,y -zy �y �y -
F �y ay �y + 5,A0 L al E N D� S ,L ,l �y al �l
_� ay BIEGIN�y �sB0. O'RT. �SI�A 44�R ,y j +91.34 L-
V ,y-ay F ,y �l �3y
ay �y �y q ,y p ,l ay al ,l T ,y �l + T. �y �L �l �l 50.00' RT.
�y �y Jl Jy ay �P �y �y �y �y I< ay ay �y �VJ q -y _ Sb I 3V + 44 �1R �l �l �l 60.� ' M .� �y 5�.0�0 -� �l �y �y �y �l ,y
F- .-� Ey � � �� �� ,yam �� �� �� �� ,yam �� �� ,yam +'�11. -L $
y ay _y ay + 30 0 L ay ay ,y 0. 0' T. ay �y �]1 10'�tT ,y �y� �y ay 80�00� -L�y + 00 -L-
�y - ,y + 7U _hL ,y 5 T� �y ay ,y ,y �l �l �l �l i �l 5 . 1 -L- ." �l �l
� � ,y 4 -y ,y ,y ,y ,y .00�yR ,y ,y �'r5.Q0' RT.
�y �� �. �5 '3 OCR -
�y ,y ,y �y5 yy001 R �y �y RT. �y �y ,y ,y+0.(�0 - -� ,l ,l ,l �l �l ,l �l �L �l �l �l �L66
OO R 5A. &T. ,y y � ,y ay + fto L� ,y ,y ay ,y 1.00'
60 ' R'1�. 'I' 1 6�OD' y + 00L- �L �l �l
�y R �y �y �yS �1y1'I P RAC ,l ,y �y �67. 0'�RT ,y 20 T. �y �y �y �y _l �l
ay + 0 L ay � Rq ay ay �TO� S O L�LC) R'PC 1 T* al 0.- 0 T.-1 �l �l �l �l �l �l �l R �l �l � ,L �l �l �l �l �l �l
�� aye ,yam �yE�ST.-�tONy� >y 7000 RT �� LpS 'II RI#�R,4P y� S�RU E PpY�}TE �� �� �� �15.�� �� �i� �� �� �� �� �� �y� �y�7by0 R1 � CNy'I IP�R �y� �y� �y� �� �y� �y� �y� �� ��
ES S GD ,y �73OOR . ,yST*2 TO1Fd
,y ,y O FAO U DL R POINT �y �i �y �y ,y -y �y E S S"
ay ay ay ay ,y ,y � _ ,y ay fyNb Cyr.- l' RJ P�RAk E D 6 f�rF D
�y �y �y ay �E NB - ,yS$RU G�TCRESy P(Y 1Ei1 ,y
*S PEE P
STA. 3Y+ 0 kr B I N L.� I I' P'lRA Ell D �y � >y � ay � �y ,y �y ay �y �y ,y ,y
� � � � � � ,y ST��",6y+�2LTA RyT� ,yam ,yam y ay'y ,yam �y,y �� ,yam ,yam ,yam �� aye �� �� �� ��
ay 'y ,y � -y � �$E1yyT �sLO�E�f'RC�T&CTIPI
N � ay ,y � � � ,l § fA �33y+ 7k LyT Bay R �y �y �y
�� �� aye �� �� ��� �� _51� � �
,y ,yam ,yam ,yam �� ��
8. 0 T. ,l �l � �y �y - �l al �y �l al ,l �l �l
�y �y � � � �� �� �� �� ,yam ,yam ,yam � �� 8��'R�.� �� �� �� aye � ,l
� � - �
-5- -y- -y- -y-
may �� �'" � �� ��-" �-"- --�elM ,c - � - �- �- �-.�-• � a�M� � al � - - - - �, - -v - r- -� -ate - � - � �. � ,. `I
9�M- 9�M� 9�-\ �-JL�i �� �Jy
4 END TIP PROJECT B-4926
L STA Al + 00 00
DISSIPATOR PLAN VIEW
PAD
*NOTE: CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW DECK DRAINS
GROUND
L -
J�
GEOTEXTILE 1'
PROFILE VIEW
L= 190'
Type of Liner= 54 TONS CL 'I' Rip -Rap
Geotextile= 119 SY GFD
FROM -L- STA. 34 + 05 TO STA. 35 + 95 LT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
NORTH CAROLINA HABITAT FOUNDATION
MARK T. SCHOLER
DB 1408 PG 452
DB 1489 PG 253
DB 1572 PG 534
PB 9 PG 356
"""•" "`
""• CL. 'II' RIP RAP
ROCK PLATING
W/GEOTEXTILE
Natural
Ground
_ - 2-FT THICK
GRADE AWAY FROM Natural
TOE OF FILL +/-0.5% Ground
DENOTES
EXCAVATION TOTAL EXCAVATION
QUANTITY= EST. 2 6,800 CY
FROM
-L- STA. 17 + 00 TO
STA. 23 + 25
LT
FROM
-L- STA. 2 7 + 81 TO
STA. 34 + 2 7
LT
FROM
-L- STA. 35 + 92 TO
STA. 40 + 00
LT
FROM
-DRV- STA. 10 + 00 TO
STA. 12 + 18
LT
FROM
-DRV- STA. 10 + 00 TO
STA. 12 + 18
RT
NOTE: GUARDRAIL TRANSITIONS WITH A 50:1 TAPER TO MATCH BRIDGE OFFSETS.
END CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 43 + 25.00
PROVIDE CLASS 'II' RIP RAP ROCK PLATING ON
ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR AS INDICATED
ON THE PLANS. 2-FT THICK TO SHOULDER POINT.
REFER TO STANDARD ROCK PLATING DETAIL SHEET 2G-2
SEE SHEET 6 FOR -L- PROFILE
SEE SHEETS S-? THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS

MULTIPLE OPENING
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
-L
C
CT
Q
�1
Nm
N�
o
vo
�J
om
�o
l Ef
30
20
10
1
BRIDGE @ CENTERLINE STA. 25+45 —L—
BRIDGE @ CENTERLINE STA. 35 +00 —L —
DESIGN DISCHARGE =
20,700
DESIGN FREQUENCY =
5
DESIGN HW ELEVATION =
24.8
BASE DISCHARGE =
44,300
BASE FREQUENCY =
/00
BASE HW ELEVATION =
30.9
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE =
26,000
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY=
/0 +/-
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION =
26.2xx
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY
PI =
17+75.00
EL
= 25.25'
VC
= 550'
K =
/5/
DS
= 60 MPH
= NOV. 2017
= 14.5 +/ -
CFS
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
929
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
B -4926
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
6
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
PI 25 00 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiDOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
EL 1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
VC • f ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
JS ./ MPH■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Raleigh, NC 27603
1■■■■■■L�JErn■i■IrT■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ License: •
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I oVJ NI\J, I.V A.I I I I I I I I 1 1/1\1 I I J 1 1 J- �- A-0-9y -T 7 r I I I/ n% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 .I--TI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W17'1-�-I_t_I: I I -I-T `I' 6 1 k I I I I I I 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 kIt APC I -liU IcI 1k I^X11; 41 AI F711 1 1 1 1/1 1 1 1 1 1 17-' Y I I I I 1 I I II I I J/f I I I I I I I I I
^^JIlGJIII■■lleE'J■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I:■■■■■■■■■■■■■I�■■■■■■IIr_IIi7I►!E3/i�i1/,■r.�i■■■■■■■�
BL STATION•28" LEFT
■■■■■■Ialill■il[!lIII:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IaI,EII■EI/i7f/Lfr■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IBENCH NAIL SET IN •
" PINE
MULTIPLE OPENING
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ BRIDGE ww
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN DISCHARGE =
20,700
DESIGN FREQUENCY =
5
DESIGN HW ELEVATION =
24.8
BASE DISCHARGE =
44,300
BASE FREQUENCY =
/00
BASE HW ELEVATION =
30.9
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE =
26,000
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY=
/0 +/-
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION =
26.2xx
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY
PI =
32 +40.00
EL
= 29.85'
VC
= 360'
K=136
DS
= 60 MPH
= NOV. 2017
= 14.5 +/ -
CFS
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
21
22
-L
23
24 25 26
PI = 38+20.00
EL = 27.93'
VC = 120'
K = 187
DS = 70 MPH
PI = 40+20.00
EL = 28.55'
VC = /50'
K = 3/8
DS = 75 MPH
iiiiiiiiiiiiim - 4WEl4�t!77»CIMMATATM■
r
DITCH LEGEND
LEFT DITCH ------
RIGHT DITCH ---------
SEE SHEET 5 FOR PLAN VI
41 42
30
20
10
0
_ ■
29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
38 39 40
43

-D RV -
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
B -4926
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
7
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
10
P1 =
10+45.00
EL
= 22./5'
VC
= 90'
K =
/0
DS
= /5 MPH
11
P/ =
11 +95.00
EL
= 35.87'
VC
= 60
K =
5
DS
= /5 MP)
12
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
w 1 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
_g,' License: C-2197
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
SEE SHEET 4 FOR PLAN VIEW
cam
N�1
o
vo
�L
om
�o 0

STATE OF NORTH C KOLA N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
AYS
B-4926
CROSS SECTION INDEX
ALIGNMENT AND STATIONING
—L — STA. 14 -�00o00 TO STA. 44 -�00o00
—DRY — STA. // -�00o00 TO STA. 12 -�00o00
CT
X
a)
C)
C10
X
s
Cc
Co
N
CT'
Nm
N
OZ
CvU
\N
Ox
C9
OF SHEETS
SHEET NUMBERS
X-2 TO X—/5
X—/6

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

E
CTI
x
:3,
EL
c9
x
x
'l--
cv mC,
o _
xL)
-�, C�OE
CDXL
'-,!c
Q0 o-

0 5 10 PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-492 6 I X-15
0
0
0
D-
om
oL)
�C�OE
CDXL�!c
0 0-

0 5 10 PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-492 6 I X-16
0
0
0
0
0
x
0
0
Cc
0
0
0
D-
om
oL)
�C�OE
CDXL�!c
0 0-

APPENDIX E

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BiSER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Mr. Casey Whitley, P.E., PLS
NCDOT Division 2 Project Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2815 Rouse Road Extension
Kinston, North Carolina 28504
Dear Mr. Whitley:
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 17, 2023
Division 2 Project — TIP B-4926, Replace Bridges 20 and 34 on NC 55 over the Neuse River Overflow, Lenoir
County, WBS # 17BP.2.PE.94
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality — Division
of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ-DMS) will provide the mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information
received from you on February 17, 2023, the impacts are located in CU 03020202 of the Neuse River basin in the Southern
Inner Coastal Plain (SICP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Neuse
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03020202
SICP
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non -Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Zone 1
Zone 2
Impacts
0
0
258.000
8.720
0
0
0
0
(feet/acres)
NCDEQ-DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory mitigation credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Instrument dated
July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be
valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from NCDEQ-DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
� a.6� �a�M,
or James�stanfill
f DMS Deputy Director
cc: Mr. Tom Steffens, USACE — Washington
Mr. Garcy Ward, NCDWR
Mr. Brad Chilton, NCDOT — EAU
Ms. Anna Reusche, PWS, TranSystems
File: B-4926 — Division 2
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Mitigation Services
'®}Jl[ 217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
NOPTH CAFULM
aepakh & Eawl�aaa� , n \ /"� 919.707.8976

APPENDIX F

DocuSign Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
STIP Project No.: B-4926
WBS No.: 40163.1.2
Proiect Location: STIP project B-4926 is located on NC 55, northeast of the City of
Kinston in Lenoir County.
Proiect Description: The proposed project includes the replacement of two functionally
obsolete existing bridges: one across the Neuse River (Bridge No. 20) and one over a
nearby Neuse River wetland (Bridge No. 34). Bridge No. 20 was built in 1937 and has a
sufficiency rating of 55.95. Bridge No. 34 was also built in 1937 and has a sufficiency
rating of 54.47. The proposed project and surrounding area is located in a rural area with
low -density residential activity. The Study Area includes low -density residential and
some agricultural land. No notable recent growth or development are evident in the
surrounding area.
The replacement structures would be on new alignment for Bridge No. 20, approximately
540 feet long and providing a minimum 32-feet clear deck width. The new Bridge No. 34
would be approximately 215 feet long providing a minimum 32 feet clear deck width.
Both bridges would include two 12-foot travel lanes; four -foot offsets and 54-inch
bicycle safe railings would provide safe accommodation to bicyclists. The bridge length
is based on preliminary design information and is set by hydraulic requirements. The
roadway grade of the new structure would be approximately the same as the existing
structure.
The approach roadway would extend approximately 775 feet from the northwest end of
the new Bridge No. 20 and 700 feet from the northeast end of the new Bridge No. 34.
The approaches would be widened to include a 32-foot pavement width providing two
12-foot lanes and two four -foot shoulders to accommodate bicycles. Four -foot grass
shoulders would be provided on each side (eight -foot shoulders where guardrail is
included). The roadway would be designed as a Major Collector using Regional Tier
Guidelines; the design speed would be 60 miles per hour (mph).
With the proposed alternative, traffic would be detoured on -site during construction.
Purpose and Need: NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate the existing
bridges are functionally obsolete; both were constructed in 1937. Bridge No. 20 has a
sufficiency rating of 55.95, and Bridge No. 34 has a sufficiency rating of 54.47.
Both bridges also meets the criteria for functionally obsolete due to a structural appraisal
of five out of nine and a deck geometry appraisal of two out of nine. With aging
structures (both are 81 years old), the bridges are approaching the end of their useful life
and are in need of replacement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
NC 55 carries 3,020 vehicles per day with 3,900 vehicles per day projected for 2040. The
substandard deck width is becoming increasingly unacceptable; replacement of the bridge
would result in safer traffic operations. As there are currently no sidewalks or bicycle
lanes within the Study Area, the proposed project would also improve safety for both
motorists and cyclists; the new design includes four -foot offsets to be used as bicycle
lanes with bicycle -safe railings.
Components of both the concrete superstructure and substructure have experienced an
increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer be addressed by maintenance
activities. The posted weight limit on the bridge is down to 30 tons for single vehicles
and 31 tons for truck -tractor semi -trailers. The bridge is approaching the end of its useful
life. Replacement of the bridge would result in safer traffic operations.
Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: In consultations with relevant
agencies (City of Kinston Public Services Director, Steve Miller, February 27, 2015;
County of Lenoir Planning, Wayland Humphrey, March 2, 2015; NCDOT Architectural
Historian, Vanessa Patrick, March 30, 2015; NCDOT Rail Division, James B. Harris,
March 30, 2015; NC Division of Parks and Recreation, Justin Williamson, April 24,
2015; NCDOT Archaeologist 11, Caleb Smith, May 5, 2015; NCDOT Transportation
Planning, Karen Robertson, June 3, 2015; Lenoir County Public Schools, Cindy Bruner,
September 26, 2017; DPS Division of Emergency Management, John D. Brubaker, April
27, 2018; U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Gary Jordan, April 30, 2018; NCDEQ Inactive
Hazardous Sites Branch, Katie Tatum, May 1, 2018; State Historic Preservation Office,
Renee Gledhill -Earley, May 18, 2018; NC Department of Bicycle and Pedestrian
Transportation, John Vine -Hodge, May 10, 2018; Regional UST Supervisor, Sylvia
Newsom-Huneke, May 11, 2018; Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section,
Drew Hammonds, May 15, 2018; NC Department of Natural & Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program, Suzanne Mason, May 17, 2018; NC Wildlife Resources
Commission, Travis Wilson, May 16, 2018; State Environmental Review Clearinghouse,
Crystal Best, May 29, 2018; and U.S. Coast Guard, Hal R. Pitts, June 14, 2018), it was
noted that several permits and further consultations are required for this proposed project.
Commitments resultant of these permits and consultations have been included in the
Project Commitments section of this report.
Permits: As the Neuse River is navigable water, a Section 10 Permit from the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) would be required. Due to the 1.5 acres of wetland impacts
for the proposed project, a USACE Section 404 Individual Permit is anticipated for this
proposed project. An USACE Nationwide Permit 33 may also be required for temporary
construction activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or temporary causeways
often used during bridge construction or rehabilitation work. Further consultation with
USACE will determine what permit(s) are required to authorize construction. In addition
to the 404 Permit, other required authorizations may include the corresponding Section
401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDEQ). If waterways are closed or the navigability would be impacted by
project construction, the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) should be notified. Details regarding
project completion notification have been summarized within the Project Commitments.
W

DocuSign Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
Riparian Buffer Rules: The proposed project is located within the Neuse River Basin
and subject to Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules administered by NCDEQ.
Additionally, the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) has
designated this portion of the Neuse River as an Inland Primary Nursery Area and has
established that an in -water moratorium be done between February 15 and September
30. Bridge No. 34 is located within the floodplain of the Neuse River, so this area may be
subject to the NCWRC moratorium in a flood event that provides active surface water
connection to the Neuse River.
Impaired Waters: No impaired waters are located within the proposed project area.
Coast Guard: Based on coordination with the USCG (Hal R. Pitts, Bridge Program
Manager, June 14, 2018), it was determined that a USCG Bridge Permit is not required.
The proposed project received an Advance Approval category as per Title 33 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 115.70.
FEMA: The NCDOT Hydraulic Unit noted that the proposed project would require a
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) permit.
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA): The North Carolina Department of Public Safety
noted that the proposed project includes encroachment within SFHA and Floodway to the
Neuse River. As such, NC Executive Order 123 directs NCDOT to coordinate with and
follow the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) floodplain management
requirements which are found in the Federal Executive Order (EO) 11988. To ensure
NCDOT compliance with EO 11988 and 44 CFR, the NCDOT Hydraulics Section and
The NC Floodplain Mapping Program have a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA).
Coordination with the NCDOT Hydraulics Unit is recommended to determine if
proposed encroachments and crossings within the Study Area are eligible to fall within
the MOA.
Historic Architecture, Landscapes, and Archaeology: There are no architectural or
archaeological resources that would be affected by the proposed project.
Critical Habitats: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has designated the Neuse
River within the proposed project area as Critical Habitat for the Carolina distinct
population segment of Atlantic sturgeon. As such NMFS will be contacted to coordinate
for this species.
Endangered Species Habitat: The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists two
federally protected species for Lenoir County: the red -cockaded woodpecker
(Leuconotopicus borealis) and sensitive joint -vetch (Aeschynomene virginica). Suitable
habitat was determined not to be present within the Study Area for either species,
therefore a biological conclusion of "No Effect" was determined for these species. The
USFWS and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) both noted that the
Neuse River waterdog (Nectarus lewisi) is known to occur in the Neuse River in Lenoir
3

DocuSign Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
County. This species is designated an At -Risk Species (ARS). As such, it is
recommended that the status of this species be monitored in case it changes before the
completion of the proposed project.
In addition, the USWFS has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in
conjunction with the FHWA, USACE and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat
(NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covered the entire
NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The
programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect, Likely to
Adversely Affect. The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and would
ensure compliance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all
NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8; this includes Lenoir County,
where B-4926 is located. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective
date of a final listing determination through April 30, 2020.
Special Proiect Information:
Environmental Commitments: Greensheet Commitments are located at the end of the
checklist.
Estimated Costs (Preferred Alternative: Alternative 2 - New Alignment):
The estimated costs are as follows:
Construction: $ 9,000,000
Right of Way/Utilities: TBD
Total Cost: $ 9,000,000*
*costs subject to change during design process. Costs developed during 25% design.
Estimated Traffic:
Current (No Build) 3,020 AADT
2040 Build 3,900 AADT
TTST 3%
Dual 5%
Crash Analysis Summary: A strip crash analysis was completed 500 feet from both
sides of Bridges No. 34 and No. 20 for a five-year period from May 1, 2013 to April 30,
2018. SEPI reviewed crash patterns and rates along the NC 55 corridor.
Table 1 provides a comparison of average crash rates for similar facilities across the state.
Results show that the night, wet and total crash rates for the area surrounding B-4926 are
greater than the statewide and critical crash rates. There were four total crashes along the
corridor in a five-year period, including three fixed object crashes and one movable
object crash. There were no bicycle or pedestrian crashes along the corridor. None of the
four total crashes were related to the geometry of the bridge.
Design Exceptions: The existing roadway has a posted speed of 55 mph. The bridge
structures are located within a curve. NCDOT Division 2 has approved the proposed
4

DocuSign Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
design criteria to minimize impacts to the wetlands. A superelevation of 0.04 is used for
-L- PI Sta. 37+86.49 and 0.02 for -L- PI Sta. 40+56.55 due to reverse curve and tie to
existing super at -L- Sta. 42+00.00. The proposed roadway would meet the recommended
design speed for this type of facility, but not the recommended superelevation. It was
determined that the reverse curve radius required to meet the recommended
superelevation would increase overall cost, right of way requirements, and environmental
impacts for the proposed project. A design exception has been determined for this
proposed project in relation to the superelevation.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations: Both bridges are located on Bicycle Route
40, known as the County Loop Route on the Lenoir County Bicycle Route. As per
recommendations from the NCDOT Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation,
the proposed project would incorporate four foot offsets on both sides of the bridge,
continuing as paved shoulders for at least 100 feet on either side of the bridge, and
54-inch bicycle safe railings, to provide safe accommodation to bicyclists. Boating is
present in the Neuse River, and the Mountain -to -Sea Trail paddle route includes the
Neuse River in this area. As such, the North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation
recommended that the NCDOT consider a small parking area and canoe launch as part of
the bridge replacement to allow for safe pedestrian and paddle access to the Neuse River.
The proposed alternative would provide access to the boating area.
Bridge Demolition: Bridges No. 20 and No. 34 are constructed entirely of concrete and
steel; it should be possible to remove both with no resulting debris in the water based on
standard demolition practices. Any demolition practices shall adhere to the construction
moratorium to the Neuse River during bridge demolition.
Alternatives Discussion:
No Build — The no build alternative would result in eventually closing the bridge as its
condition continues to deteriorate.
Rehabilitation — The bridges were constructed in 1937. The structures are functionally
obsolete and they are reaching the end of their useful life. Rehabilitation work was
performed and load restriction signs were added to Bridge No. 20. Further rehabilitation
would require replacing the substructure and superstructure which would constitute
effectively replacing the bridge.
Onsite Detour — An onsite detour was not evaluated due to the presence of an acceptable
offsite detour.
Staged Construction — Staged construction was not considered because of the
construction moratorium and duration of construction due to the moratorium on Neuse
River.
Alternative 1 (Replace in Place) — Bridges No. 34 and No. 20 would be replaced on the
existing alignment. Traffic would be detoured during construction. With Alternative 1,
the proposed detour is approximately 16 miles through downtown Kinston. The travel
time for the detour is expected to take 45 minutes. Feedback was received from Lenoir
5

DocuSign Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
County Emergency Management and Lenoir County Schools in September 2017.
Emergency Management indicated that redistricting of response areas would be required
with an offsite detour. Lenoir County Schools operate four school buses in the mornings
and evenings. An offsite detour is expected to create a significant impact to school bus
operation.
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative - New Alignment) — Alternative 2 includes the
replacement of Bridges No. 34 and No. 20 just south of the current bridge with an on -site
detour. The replacement structures would be approximately 540 feet long providing a
minimum 32 feet clear deck width for Bridge No. 20, and approximately 215 feet long
providing a minimum 32 feet clear deck width for Bridge No. 34. Both bridges would
include two 12-foot lanes, four -foot offsets, and 54-inch bicycle safe railings to provide
safe accommodation to bicyclists. The roadway grade of the new structure would be
approximately the same as the existing structure. This alternative would allow for an on -
site detour and shorter construction timing compared to Alternative 1.
Due to concerns with significant delays to general traffic, EMS, and school bus operation
with an off -site detour, the presence of several rail crossings on off -site detour routes, and
a three-year construction estimate due to moratoria, Alternative 2 was selected as the
preferred alternative in an agency and NCDOT meeting held on October 17, 2018.
As Alternative 2 has been deemed as the preferred alternative, only it has been discussed
in detail within this document. Avoidance and minimization techniques were evaluated
such as reducing the paved shoulder width from five to four feet and using a 2:1 slope.
Based on the approved 25% design on October 10, 2018, the total impacts to wetlands are
approximately 1.5 acres. In consultation with USACE and DWR, an on -site mitigation
was recommended and evaluated. Based on the current design, approximately 0.85 acres
would be available for an on -site mitigation site. The feasibility of the on -site mitigation
site is subject to utility coordination and final design and will be included in the
Individual Permit (IP) document during permitting.
A new alignment alternative to the north was not evaluated since the bridges would be on
a curve which would lengthen the limits of the proposed project as well as increase
wetland impacts.
Public Involvement:
A newsletter was mailed to 397 landowners within the Study Area in May 2018. The
newsletter included pertinent project information including a vicinity map, description of
the proposed project, and contact information for the NCDOT project manager. No public
comments were received in response to the project newsletter. Due to the nature of the
proposed project, no public meeting was determined unnecessary.
V

DocuSign Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
Other Agency Comments & Responses:
Local Official Input Forms were sent to Lenoir County Schools, Lenoir County EMS and
the Lenoir County Planning and Inspections Department on February 26, 2015. A formal
Scoping Meeting was held on April 20, 2015. Various representatives from relevant
NCDOT Divisions attended the meeting and provided comments on the proposed project.
On April 11, 2018, several relevant agencies were mailed a copy of the Start of Study
letter and attached Project Data Sheet, Project Vicinity Map and Environmental Features
Map, either directly or through a letter forwarded from the State Clearinghouse; the
agencies were asked to provide comments on the proposed project. Copies of agency
correspondence can be found in the Appendix. Commitments made as a result of these
comments are summarized in the Project Commitments.
PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
YES NO
Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity which would qualify ® ❑
as a Non -Major Action under the Minimum Criteria rules?
If "yes", under which category? Category 9 9
(Note: If either Category 48 or # 15 is used, complete Part D of this checklist.)
If "no", then the project does not qualify as a Non -Major Action. A state environmental impact
statement (EIS) or environmental assessment (EA) will be required.
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS
YES NO
Would the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use ❑
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality impacts?
Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative impacts that ❑
may result in a significant adverse impact to human health or the environment?
Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed activity
has such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern for its ❑
environmental effects has been expressed to the NCDOT?
Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands;
surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries; parklands; prime or unique ❑
agricultural lands; or areas of recognized scenic, recreational, archaeological, or
historical value?
Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the ❑
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?
Would the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or ❑
groundwater impacts?
Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on long- ❑
term recreational benefits of shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their natural habitats?

DocuSign Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
Note: If any of Questions 2 through 14 in part B are answered "YES", the proposed project does
not qualify as a Non -Major Action. A state EIS or EA will be required.
PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
YES
Ecologicalpacts
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its habitat, likely to
be impacted by the proposed action? (See the Green Sheet Project
Commitments for the Northern long-eared bat.)
10. Does the action require the placement of fill in waters of the United
States?
11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of fill in high
quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as mountain bogs or pine ❑
savannahs?
12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined ❑
in the Coastal Area Management Act?
13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes? ❑
Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an "effect" on a property or site listed on the National ❑
Register of Historic Places?
15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of way from ❑
publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
Questions in Part "C" are designed to assist the Engineer and the Division Environmental
Officer in determining whether a permit or consultation with a state or federal resource
agency may be required. If any questions in Part "C" are answered "yes", follow the
appropriate permitting procedures prior to beginning project construction.
8

DocuSign Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
Reviewed by:
DocuSigned by:
10/17/2018 F x f�f4H�l.Nhk�L
Date Raj it Ramkumar, PE
SEPI Engineering and Construction, Inc.
Consultant Project Manager
DocuSigned by:
10/18/2018 FF
Date Casey K. Whitley, PE
Division Project Manager
Division of Highways — Division 2
North Carolina Department of Transportation
DocuSigned hby::
10/24/2018 F� 15• J66'S&'
Date Jaya.-Toliiison
Division Environmental Officer
Division of Highways — Division 2
North Carolina Department of Transportation

Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
PROJECT COMMITMENTS:
Lenoir County
NC 55 Bridge No. 20 and Bridge No. 34
over Neuse River
TIP Project No.: B-4926
State Project No.: 40163.1.2
Division Two, Construction Office
FEMA
This proposed project involves construction activities on or adjacent to FEMA-regulated
stream(s). Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed as -built construction plans to the
Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying that the drainage
structure(s) and roadway embankment that are located within the 100-year floodplain
were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically.
Hydraulics
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), to
determine status of proposed project with regard to applicability of NCDOT' S
Memorandum of Agreement, or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
Anadromous Fish - Atlantic Sturgeon Critical Habitat
According to the NCWRC, the portion of the Neuse River within the proposed project
area is designated as Critical Habitat for the Atlantic sturgeon. The NMFS will be
contacted to coordinate for this species. NCDOT should follow all stream crossing
guidelines for anadromous fish passage, and an in -water work moratorium must be
completed from February 15 to September 30 as this portion of the Neuse River has
designated as an Inland Primary Nursery by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC). Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish will be
implemented in the design and construction of this proposed project.
Bridge Demolition
During demolition mitigation measures would be in place to prevent debris from the
bridge from falling into the Neuse River. This may include nets or tarps under the bridge
to catch debris.
Northern Long-eared Bat
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has developed a programmatic biological
opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat
(NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire
NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The
programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect, Likely to
Adversely Affect. The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure
compliance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT
projects with a federal nexus in Division 1-8, which includes Lenoir County, where

Envelope ID: ABF270Fl-923B-4FO3-9521-3595559D2F82
B-4926 is located. Project requirement for PBO compliance: After project completion,
the contract administrator for construction must submit the actual amount of tree clearing
reported in tenths of acres. This information should be submitted at:
https://connect. ncdot. gov/site/construction/biosurveys/Li sts/Northern%20Long%20Eared
%20Bat/AllItems. aspx
Water & Sewer Lines
According to City of Kinston Public Services Director Rhonda Barwick, there is a Town
of Dover sewer forcemain (which is the sole discharge point for the Town of Dover and
Town of Cove City collection systems) bored under the river adjacent to the bridge.
North Lenoir Water Corporation also has a water main either attached to the bridge or
under the river. As such, the environmental study completed by the forcemain engineers
should be reviewed. NCDOT will coordinate with these towns and North Lenoir Water
Corporation prior to construction to limit impacts. If existing water lines would be
relocated during the construction, plans for the water line relocation must be submitted to
the Division of Water Resources/Public Water Supply Section at 1634 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1634. For more information, contact the Public
Water Supply Section, [phone].

APPENDIX G

Anna Reusche
From: Whitley, Casey K <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 12:02 PM
To: Rajit Ramkumar
Cc: Anna Reusche; Bob Lepsic
Subject: FW: Widening Project for PBO review
FYI
From: Burroughs, Anne M <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 11:00 AM
To: Whitley, Casey K <[e-mail]>
Cc: Gray, Jared S <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Widening Project for PBO review
Casey,
B-4926 is entered in form and approved for PBO by Gary (due to in -water bents) as long as no planning changes were
made (regarding bents) and sensitive waters designs enhanced erosion control measures are used in construction.
Only the main bridge # 20, requires payment (25K) as bridge 20 has no flow under normal condition, wetland complex
appears to lack a drain channel and is not habitat for either Neuse River waterdog or Carolina madtom.
Project is on list for payment (just NRWD/CMT) this quarter.
-Anne
From: Whitley, Casey K <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 10:28 AM
To: Burroughs, Anne M <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Widening Project for PBO review
No that is the only stream crossing that we have.
From: Burroughs, Anne M <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 10:24 AM
To: Whitley, Casey K <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Widening Project for PBO review
You are right — when I searched it the tip was there — sorry I missed it, we think this project is good to go.
We have been working on it — and thought it was good to go.
Are there other streams (bridges pipes or culverts) than the Neuse and its Overflow crossings?
From: Whitley, Casey K <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 10:08 AM
To: Burroughs, Anne M <[e-mail]>
Cc: Gray, Jared S <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Widening Project for PBO review

Yes please begin the review for the PBO use. Please let me know what else you might need from me.
Casey
From: Burroughs, Anne M <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 10:06 AM
To: Whitley, Casey K <[e-mail]>
Cc: Gray, Jared S <[e-mail]>
Subject: Widening Project for PBO review
Hello Casey,
We are touching base to see if we can help begin review of the widening project for potential PBO use, per your online
form entery.
It seems the form may have failed to save your project info.
Feel free to call/email with any details we start review on.
-Anne
Anne Burroughs
Embedded Consultant -Environmental Scientist
Biological Surveys Group
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6106 office
919 649 9100 mobile
amburroughs(a)-ncdot.gov
1020 Birch Ridge Drive
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

APPENDIX H

Commander 431 Crawford Street
U.S. Department of United States Coast Guard Portsmouth, VA 23704-5004
Homeland Security Fifth Coast Guard District Staff Symbol: (dpb)
Phone: [phone]
United States Fax: [phone]
Email: Martm.A.Brid es use .mil
Coast Guard or CGDFiveBridges .uscQ.mil
16591
14 JUN 2018
Mr. Hon F. Yeung, P.E.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division 2
P.O. Box 1587
Greenville, NC 27835
Dear Mr. Yeung:
Coast Guard review of your proposed project as provided in a letter dated April 16, 2018, is
complete.
Based on the documentation provided and our research, it is determined that a Coast Guard
bridge permit will not be required for the proposed NC 55 Bridge across Neuse River, mile 74.0,
in Lenoir County, NC.
The project will be placed in our Advance Approval category as per Title 33 Code of Federal
Regulations Part 115.70. This Advance Approval determination is for the location and structure
described above and is valid for five years from the date of this letter. If the construction
project does not commence within this time period, you must contact this office for reaffirmation
of this authorization. Future bridge projects along the same waterway will have to be
independently evaluated before they may be considered for placement in the Advance Approval
category.
The fact that a Coast Guard bridge permit is not required does not relieve you of the
responsibility for compliance with the requirements of any other Federal, State, or local agency
who may have jurisdiction over any aspect of the project. Although the project will not require a
bridge permit, other areas of Coast Guard jurisdiction apply. The following must be met:
a. You or your contractor must notify this office at least 30 days in advance of the start of
construction and any other work which may be an obstruction to navigation, so we may
issue and update the information in our Local Notice to Mariners and monitor the project.
The notice should include details of the project; dates and hours of operation; and vessels,
barges and equipment to be used during the project.
b. At no time during the project will the waterway be closed to navigation without the prior
notification and approval of the Coast Guard. The bridge owner or contractor is required
to maintain close and regular contact with Coast Guard Sector North Carolina at (910)
772-2230 or D05-DG-SECNC-PREVENTION USCG.MIL to keep them informed of
activities on the waterway.
c. The lowest portion of the superstructure of the bridge across the waterway should clear
the 100-year flood height elevation, if feasible.

16591
14 JUN 2018
d. In addition, the requirement to display navigational lighting at the aforementioned bridge
is hereby waived, as per Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 118.40(b). This
waiver may be rescinded at any time in the future should nighttime navigation through
the proposed bridge be increased to a level determined by the District Commander to
warrant lighting.
The National Ocean Service (NOS) of the National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration
(NOAA) is responsible for maintaining the charts of U.S. waters; therefore, they must be notified
of this proposed work. You must notify our office and the NOS at the address below upon
completion of the activity approved in this letter. Your notification of project completion must
include as -built drawings or certification of the following:
a. Bridge name
b. Action type (new construction, modification, relocation, conversion (fixed/draw), etc.)
c. Dates (commenced and completed)
d. Location (latitude and longitude at bridge center and centerline of channel, statute miles
above mouth of waterway, and bridge or causeway orientation or geographic positions of
approaches)
e. Type of bridge (fixed, vertical lift, bascule, suspension, swing, trestle, pontoon, etc.)
f. Navigation clearances (vertical at mean high water and horizontal)
(Moveable — vertical at mean high water in open and closed positions)
g. Whether or not the bridge is fitted with clearance gauges
h. Whether or not the bridge has pier protection and/or fender system.
i. Type of land traffic (highway, railroad, pedestrian, pipeline, etc.)
Ms. Sladjana Maksimovic
National Ocean Service
N/CS26, Room 7317
1315 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282
If you have any further questions, please contact Mr. Marty Bridges at the above listed address or
telephone number.
Sincerely,
HAL R. PITTS
Bridge Program Manager
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
Copy: Ms. SIadjana Maksimovic, NOS
CG Sector North Carolina, Waterways Management
U. S_ Army Corps of Engineers, Washington District

APPENDIX I

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
10-01-0039
__— update
G'It HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
' NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
t
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
B-4926
County:
Lenoir
WBS No.:
40163.1.2
Document
Type:
Fed! Aid No:
Funding:
State X Federal
Federal
Permit(s):
X Yes No
Permit
Typ e(s):
Not specified in review request
Proiect Description: Replace Bridge Numbers 20 and 34 on NC 55 over Neuse River (off -
site detour planned, presume no improvements).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIPTION OF REVIEWACTIVITIES, RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS: HPOWeb reviewed on 27 March
2015 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Lenoir
County current GIs mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated an APE of woodland and
wetland (viewed 27 March 2015). Bridge Numbers 20 and 34, both constructed in 1937, are not eligible
for the National Register according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey as they are not representative of
any distinctive engineering or aesthetic types. Google Maps "Street View" confirmed the absence of
critical historic structures/landscapes in the APE (viewed 27 March 2015).
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THEAVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDES RELIABLE BASIS FOR REASONABLY PREDICTING THAT
THERE ARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE RESOURCES IN
THE PROJECT AREA: APE extends 500 feet from the western end of Bridge No. 20 to 500 feet from the
eastern end of Bridge No. 34 (NW -SE) and 100 feet to either side of the NC 55 center line (NE -SW) to
encompass proposed construction. The county architectural survey and related publication, as well as
later studies, record no properties in the APE (M. Ruth Little, et al., Coastal Plain and Fancy - the Historic Architecture of
Lenoir County and Kinston, North Carolina, Kinston: City of Kinston and Lenoir County Historical Association, 1998). County
GIS/tax materials and other visuals support the absence of significant architectural resources. No
National Register -listed properties are located within the APE. There are NR-listed properties along the
proposed off -site detour route, which will require review should any detour improvements be planned.
Should the design of the project change, including the addition of off -site detour
improvements, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture
as additional review may be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
e Archi
NCDOT Architectural Historian
es, nNO SURVEY REQUIRED
Date
Historic Archilectu e and Landscapes NO SURVEY REOillliL DJmm for iLlinor Transportation Projects as Oaal f ed in the 2007 Progranunatic Agreetnenl.

Run Rd
Ar�a�n
r"
H 55 E M 2.3 ml
e�
c4nh��9ha R ' �t � F
B-4926
(Bridge No. 20)
B-4926ti�
(Bridge No. 34), ,g
"mi
rhi
Ry
a K�
Jy
�e
a Ti
i o B �i 9hhah Ra
_ -Afo
\ \ \ �NF p CpUNT
S CpUN�,y ,
OO Bridge Project
0— Studied Detour Ro
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
LENOIR COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 20 AND NO. 34
ON NC 55 OVER NEUSE RIVER
B-4926
FIGURE 1 - VICINITY MAP

�10-01-0039
J
oa NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
p
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-4926 County: LENOIR
PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL
EXCLUSION OR CATEGORICAL
WBS No: 40163.1.2 Document: EXCLUSION
F.A. No: Funding: ❑ State ® Federal
Permit
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Type: UNKNOWN
Project Description: REPLACE BRIDGE 20 ON NC 55 OVER THE NEUSE RIVER AND BRIDGE 34 ON
NC 55 OVER THE NEUSE RIVER OVERFLOW IN LENOIR COUNTY. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS
(A.P.E.) INCLUDES THE AREA 213 METERS (700 FT.) FROM EACH END OF EACH BRIDGE AND 30
METERS (100 FT.) FROM CENTERLINE ON EACH SIDE OF THE ROAD. TOTAL A.P.E. LENGTH IS
APPROXIMATELY 671 METERS (2,200 FT.) LONG AND 61 METERS (200 FT.) WIDE.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
THIS PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY REVIEWED IN 2010 AS THE REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 20. NO
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY WAS RECOMMENDED ON 7/22/2010 (ER 11-1751). THE PROJECT WAS
RE -SUBMITTED IN MARCH 2O15 TO INCLUDE THE REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 34 OVER THE NEUSE
RIVER OVERFLOW TO THE EAST OF BRIDGE 20. THE BRIDGE 34 A.P.E. INCLUDES POORLY -DRAINED
SWAMP/FLOODPLAIN WITH A LOW POTENTIAL FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES.
SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION OF THE 2010 REVIEW.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably
predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
THE A.P.E. INCLUDES POORLY -DRAINED LANDFORMS WITH A LOW POTENTIAL FOR
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info ® Photos ❑Correspondence
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REOUIRED
CALEB SMITH 5/11/2015
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST 11 Date
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 21

Archaeological Reconnaissance of Bridge Nos. 20 and 34 on NC 55
over the Neuse River, Lenoir County, North Carolina
By Caleb Smith
September 2010; Revised May 2015
Introduction
The archaeological review of Bridge 20 in Lenoir County was first assigned in February
2010 (Figure 1). The Study Area for the project included the area within 152 meters (500
ft.) of each end of the bridge and 30 meters (100 ft.) from centerline on each side of the
road. The original review included an examination of a topographic map, an aerial
photograph, the Lenoir County soil survey, and listings of previously recorded sites,
previous archaeological surveys, and previous environmental reviews at the Office of State
Archaeology (O.S.A.). Also, a reconnaissance of the project area was conducted in March
2010. No Archaeological Survey was recommended for the project in 7/22/2010.
I --
r, S
F 17 F � ri
I�11 c.11�
n Ig In aydan
ASTIF'
G41dSEur 0,,,4 lS Glee oCounrl. U M1oS �Illr•. 1
S
a l
a,
1 yam' rl•,n•„,-..
s E
i'f�4iy y,:.pyef,,�yr�,, �.:. .-...�-'%r�3����'�•:��J6��, a_s;:l, +7�a .S�sxr]C$.- �L Ca-d:�1_ r �iJ<.. ]nYa:ws. a7u�J•31�yrG'�i+mD. L'i�h�' ..�'j�•.:
Figure 1: Location of Bridges 20 and 34.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 21

The project was re -submitted for archaeological review in March 2015. This time the Area
of Potential Effects (A.P.E.) was much larger because it included the replacement of a
second bridge (34) located over the Neuse River overflow approximately 183 meters (600
ft.) east of Bridge 20 (Figure 2). The A.P.E. for each bridge includes the area 214 meters
(700 ft.) from each end of the bridge and 30 meters (100 ft.) on each side of the road.
atmV
34
.r -e
Figure 2: Location of Bridges 20 and 34 (USGS 1983 Kinston, N.C. [left] and
1983 Grifton, N.C. [right] 1:24,000-scale topographic maps).
The following is a revised version of the March 2010 report that described the
reconnaissance of the Bridge 20 study area. Bridge 34 was not included in that
reconnaissance. However, an examination of the topographic map, aerial photograph,
Lenoir County soil survey, and historic maps indicate that the A.P.E. for Bridge 34 is
located in the wide, poorly -drained floodplain/swamp along the east side of the Neuse
River (Figures 3 and 4). The landforms within the Bridge 34 A.P.E. have a low potential
for archaeological sites.
March 2010 Reconnaissance
On March 5, 2010, NCDOT archaeologists Paul Mohler and Caleb Smith conducted an
archaeological reconnaissance for the replacement of Bridge Number 20 on NC 55 over the
Neuse River in Lenoir County. The reconnaissance consisted of archaeological
background research and a visual examination of the project area.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 21

•— dP'
QSDV
-ow Ap- Term—
... _Lidtk
.� /
Bridge 20 -
16
•° -,
4
Ido- — -
AP—
_ — AMP1og �� — }a
low Sandpit
�+
•
- 40- Bridge 34 l
" „ •
Ago- #
1 — sow
�..
` — C J e t`
20 IV lh �
Figure 3: Topographic map of Bridges 20 and 34 (USGS 1983 Kinston, N.C. [left] and 1983 Grifton, N.C. [right] 1:24,000-
scale topographic maps).
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 21

,,.���� i r — . *-�.�_r t ram' +•- a'I4 i' r �•'� ' {��• •� ' f �� _ '—�
}.
Sir
r 4 •i� fit' } • ** .
46,
yY ; a. ^. +r 40 t
do W.9
.Apt
•: --'tea: .a r* r 'w. + y. A. ii'7A .t
, - -+ y• # V i`#df . -
A.
A.
r f �'js' i
�� � of -.,1' .�f 'wT.. r r W ,�►�� ar, � •1 Y. 4 ;; , a
Y 1
At
406
A.
• r �r a !
eSr'ro
MC Vne17a Pic Center far Citagtapnl[ Infarmat•an and NC 911 audr P
�Kf' _' S,4Y Opfaulk Map

The A.P.E. consisted of a 60-meter (200-foot) wide corridor that extended from the bridge
in each direction along NC 55 for approximately 152 meters (500 feet). (The A.P.E. has since
grown to include Bridge 34 over the Neuse River overflow to the east of Bridge 20.)
Background Research
Background research consisted of a review of previously recorded archaeological sites and
previously conducted archaeological projects in the vicinity, as well as examination of
historic maps. There are no previously recorded sites within the study area, and it has not
been previously surveyed.
Site 31LR38 was recorded to the east of the bridge replacement. It was recorded by Robert
Crawford in 1966. It was later destroyed by the excavation of a mine (the West pit), a
project reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) as ER 93-7137. Also, a
water line project located along NC 55 has been reviewed by HPO (ER 88-0462). A bridge
replacement on NC 55 over Jericho Run to the west of the project area was reviewed by
HPO (ER 04-0107). HPO had "no comment" on the project. Also, in 2011 HPO reviewed the
plans for the replacement of Bridge 20 (ER 11-1751).
agov
- Terr;W r
Bridge 20 replacement Land=rig
(ER 11-1751�5
•ttons-,! 31LR38 /
pm 9.6
f/% 1 40,
I •~ r _� a •
�- The West
/ pit
Water line along' ..1
NC 55?
Figure 5: Topographic map of Bridges 20 and 34 showing previously recorded site
and environment reviews in the vicinity (USGS 1983 Kinston, N.C. [left] and
1983 Grifton, N.C. [right] 1:24,000-scale topographic maps).
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
6 of 21

Maps from 1902, 1914, 1919, 1927 and 1938 show no structures in the vicinity of the bridge.
The maps show that the area around the bridge is a poorly -drained wetland/swamp that
has never been suitable for agriculture, residences or commercial/industrial development.
The maps do show that a bridge has been in this vicinity since 1902 at the latest.
The 1902 and 1914 topographic maps (United States Geological Survey [USGS] 1902,1914)
shows a symbol for a standard bridge at this location (not a drawbridge, ford or ferry),
labels the bridge "Albritton's Ldg.", and shows the river was used as a "steamboat route'
(Figure 6). It shows a different road configuration than today. The road on the west side
of the river was in the same approximate location, but on the east side the road did not
extend southeast to today's Neuse Road, but instead turned northeast and ran along the
east side of the river to "Terrapin Ldg.", and then east to Neuse Road.
8 ♦I ti- .. - j � may' [+
t-� . ■
? f .•
l '
y VI
! j
■
' r i `r•rr��
J Project Area 45
£'Asw
74 aG. s❑
Figure 6: Topographic maps of the project area in 1914 (left) and 1902 (right).
The circa 1910-1919 rural delivery route map (United States Post Office Department
[USPOD] circa 1910-1919) shows the bridge and road in approximately the same
configuration as today (Figure 7). It does not show the 1902 road leading from the project
area northeast to Terrapin Landing, nor does it label any bridges or landings. It is a map
of mail routes and labels the cluster of homes to the west of the bridge "Faulkner" and the
homes to the east of the bridge "N. West." These are presumably the names of the people
who lived in those homes.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
7 of 21

C t.0 S, 5V
• . Study Area ,
W12
s •
f
N we
ti •+
Figure 7: Map of the project area in circa 1910-1919 (USPOD circa 1910-1919).
The 1927 Lenoir County soil map (United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] 1927)
shows the bridge and road in approximately the same configuration as today (Figure 8).
The bridge is labeled "highway bridge." "Terrapin Landing' is labeled to the north. It
does not show the 1902 road from the highway bridge northeast to Terrapin Landing.
"Caswell Landing" is labeled to the south. Arbitton's Landing is not labeled on this map.
The 1938 highway map (North Carolina State Highways and Public Works Commission
[NCSHPWC] 1938) shows the bridge and road in approximately the same configurations
as today (Figure 9). A plaque on the bridge says it was built in 1937 so this map probably
shows the current bridge. The plaque labels it the "Oaks Bridge," although none of the
maps label it this way. The road is shown as U.S. Highway 70, and the symbols indicate it
was a Federal Aid "paved road, high type." (An earlier highway map [1930] labels it N.C.
Highway 10/ 11.)
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
8 of 21

0
K|
� ": .
� e ,
Study . R
Area K ®
�
ADIN
...,. �
. .
-?AY
> Qv
-
Cf
e sLs
a _.
Cross r�L
0 CA J-i `x
2
. A � - z Icr ,
FIgur ƒ Soil map of the project area in 1927(USDA 1927.
�� . �� � � � ■ �•©' � ' � � a \
., vp ■ ,
� a �
13
.. � G RREN . , 19
. _ r,AmGE ° � , Study Area CL035• 'a ®� _
P
# ,
.
a, C &
� 70 ..w ��■ , , �, ' T
. ®* N , 4b • L ` ' •Cr '
■Oil, PW#
-70 . ' - STS
sos° '
Cr ti
V ®a � �a ' _ - it° 1 .
� aa. . - ' # _
a ' IP
a
fow
� N6, � � � ■ �
�, ■ &
` a * / _
, .
Figure ± Highway map ofthe project area in198(NCSHPWC198.
ARCHAEOLOGY SURmtREQUIRED" formfor Minor Trap__ Projects zQualified athe zzProgrammatic AgreemenL
9&a

Archaeological Reconnaissance
The Neuse River is oriented northeast -southwest but is considered north -south for this
project. Each quadrant of the Bridge 20 replacement is described below. Visual
examination of the project identified landforms with a low potential for prehistoric
archaeological sites.
Most of the areas around the bridge and road appear to be poorly -drained land. The
Lenoir County soil survey (Barnhill 1977) describes the soils around the bridge as poorly -
drained. The NC 55 roadbed is raised approximately 4.5 meters (15 feet) above the
surrounding area to accommodate frequent flooding, and much of the study area was
under water during the (March 2010) reconnaissance.
Southwest Quadrant
The southwest quadrant has a low probability for archaeological sites (Figure 10). The
area from the river west for approximately 60 meters (200 feet) was covered with standing
water. There was an area of higher ground from 60-90 meters (200-300 feet) from the
bridge, and then standing water from 90-130 meters (300426 feet) west of the bridge. The
Lenoir County soil survey (Barnhill 1977) describes the soil in this quadrant as Chewacla
loam (frequently flooded), Kinston loam (frequently flooded), and Bibb soils (frequently
flooded). The nearest well -drained soil is a stretch of Lakeland sand (0-6% slopes) that
begins approximately 519 meters (1,700 feet) west of the bridge. The modern topographic
map depicts the poorly drained soils as wooded and the Lakeland soil as cleared. The
historic maps show no structures in this quadrant since 1902.
Southeast Quadrant
The southeast quadrant has a low probability for archaeological sites (Figure 11). The area
from the river east to an overflow bridge (shown on the modern topographic map) was
covered with standing water. Like the main bridge the overflow bridge has a plaque
saying it was built in 1937. The soil survey describes the soil in this quadrant as Chewacla
loam (frequently flooded) and Kinston loam (frequently flooded). The nearest well -
drained soil is a stretch of Lakeland sand (0-6% slopes) that begins approximately 701
meters (2,300 feet) east of the bridge. The modern topographic map depicts the poorly
drained soils as wooded (with a wetland symbol) and the Lakeland soil as cleared. The
historic maps show no structures in this quadrant since 1902.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
10 of 21

"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
11 of21

Northeast Quadrant
The northeast quadrant has a low probability for archaeological sites (Figure 12). The area
from the river east to the overflow bridge was covered with standing water. The soils in
this quadrant are the same as in the southeast quadrant, Chewacla loam (frequently
flooded) and Kinston loam (frequently flooded). The modern topographic map depicts the
poorly drained soils as wooded wetland and the Lakeland soil as cleared. The historic
maps show no structures in this quadrant since 1902, but the 1902 map shows there was a
road in this quadrant that ran from the bridge northeast to Terrapin Landing. Visual
examination did not identify any evidence of an old road in this quadrant.
•� h
r
,r-
Figure 12: East view of the northeast quadrant.
Northwest Quadrant
The northwest quadrant has a low probability for archaeological sites (Figure 13). Like the
southwest quadrant, the area from the river west for approximately 90 meters (300 feet)
was covered with standing water. N.C. 55 is raised approximately 3 meters (10 feet) above
the surrounding area to keep it out of the flood waters. There was an area of higher
ground from 90-180 meters (300-591 feet) from the bridge, and then standing water from
there west. Like the southwest quadrant, the soils in this quadrant are Chewacla loam
(frequently flooded), Kinston loam (frequently flooded), and Bibb soils (frequently
flooded).
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
12 of 21

The nearest well -drained soil is a stretch of Lakeland sand (0-6% slopes) that begins
approximately 519 meters (1,700 feet) west of the bridge. The modern topographic map
depicts the poorly drained soils as wooded and the Lakeland soil as cleared. The historic
maps show no structures in this quadrant since 1902.
There is a wide shoulder (approximately 10 meters [32 feet]) located along the north side
of N.C. 55 in this quadrant, and there is an access road that runs from the road east
towards the Neuse River, perhaps to a boat launch or picnic area (Figure 14). Visual
examination of the access road identified some kind of structure remains in this quadrant.
The structural features included four small concrete footings with bolts sticking out of the
tops, and a concrete retaining wall (Figure 15). The wall is located 15 meters (50 feet) west
of the river and 10 meters (32 feet) north of the road. The footings are 5 meters (16 feet)
west of the wall.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
13 of 21

"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
14 of 21

Origin of the Structural Features
It is not possible to determine the structural features' age, origin or purpose based on their
physical characteristics. They are made of cement, a building material that has been used
for many years and provides little information about a construction date. It is possible
there are more structural features located outside of the A.P.E. but the reconnaissance
focused on the areas close to the bridge. The heavily wooded, swampy land did not
encourage exploration of the areas located away (north of) the road.
Historic maps indicate that a bridge has been at this approximate location since 1902. The
plaque on the current bridge says it was built in 1937. Background research identified a
1919 notice that the Lenoir County Commissioners had awarded a contract to the Roanoke
Iron and Bridge Works to build a bridge over the Neuse River at the "Oak Bridge site' six
miles from Kinston (Figure 16). The distance from Kinston is not very informative since it
is not known whether the distance refers to road miles or river miles, and it is not known
at what point the measurement began. Based on the scales of the 1914 and 1902
topographic maps the bridge would have been approximately 6 miles by road from the
east side of Kinston. Also, the bridge plaque calls the current bridge the "Oaks Bridge," so
the notice probably refers to this location. Also, the contract called for concrete abutments
and piers and that is what the structural features are made of, so the remains could be
from that bridge.
I xld, clerk.
MIDI RECRI VED A%p CONTRAC1172
(mTndlapL is -Ciw raatl� Aw rd-Md.)
U81111" rSp X9M46---• U11 Tk%0n dt W GI -
bi>rr<, t d);r CGT1 rtia r t�
it
1l rom B r;ok3TD, L t 1$,000,
K I R440w,, X. C.--* R06kn r k1@ Z ran
Flrlrlig-F Workk R" nQke, Ya, ror eqa-
atructlruff stool bishwray hr�dta w1th
draw apita aCrib*e RTrrr R1 OsLk
BrIfte aiEib� 4 mil" Yr-om KInst-an, 312 IL
a length witli a If -rt. roadwit •. £oneret
AL tm-pnts &-nd -pIar3p. ■t $N,607.
eons. D. U,* 1), C. go &
lion. iMut nit bridgm
c-oxt1ng $V,N-Qr Dapt, of pub- work■,
Figure 16: 1919 description of a contract awarded to
build a bridge at/near the project area
(Municipal Journal and Public Works 1919).
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
15 of21

The 1937 design plans of the present bridge (courtesy of the NCDOT Bridge Maintenance
Unit) have an inset in the lower left corner of the "Special Drawing for Oaks Bridge over
Neuse River." The inset shows the new bridge's relationship to the previous bridge
(Figure 17). There is no scale on the inset map, but it shows the previous bridge's west end
may have been located within the study area. The concrete wall is located approximately
10 meters (33 feet) north of the bridge so the wall and footings could be the remains of the
previous bridge.
i*�a*rtl,f
f +I�01f .aV
{'.i.0. d O
f3• -jo•
f rPV. " ir. fro•
F. " 1 it f4P elm
X 5 f l;:bridge"
.-C _9A. +
f�f'r a5al+Jdltn�
' `h-_ iii + �Present
r �! I
+'' f ,
Q�
Nod wit
• ++~� � '
''
r n� i p.. � j { �i
Jtr�f�fin 1
5 '
, I
fJ ,,� �+
'+'! {Ni aril D£IRfyr•
-
'
"Proposed `
bridge"
.i�
7.
1■� {Yi
fib
1
-
—F Gvrrrer dl JDp rtC,
Figure 17: "Location Sketch" on the design plans of the 1937 bridge.
The structural features could be the remains of a building. The configuration of the
concrete footings looks like a foundation for a large piece of machinery or storage tank.
The bolts in the top indicated something was fastened to them and removed later. If they
were part of a structure it was probably related to an industry that utilized the Neuse
River like a loading dock or wharf. However, it is odd that none of the historic maps from
the early through middle twentieth-century show any buildings at this location. A 1954
aerial photograph (courtesy of the North Carolina Geological Survey [NCGS]) does not
show any clearings or other evidence of industrial development next to the bridge (Figure
18). The aerial photograph shows what may be an old access road (perhaps the current
access road) in the northwest quadrant. This road could be the approach to the previous
bridge, although the location sketch in Figure 17 shows the previous bridge would have
been approached from the northwest. There is no other evidence of any activity at this
location. It is certainly possible that the remains either pre- or post-date the maps and
aerial photograph.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SUR VEY REQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
16 of 21

s F 4
Study Area
r
Structural
features
AA
, - rr ■
1'
k �
s.
a
s L
•+ i i
Figure 18: Aerial photograph of the project area in 1954 (courtesy o
NCGS).
The features could be the remains of a river improvement structure installed by the U.S.
Army Engineers in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth -centuries. A series of river and
harbor appropriations in the 1870s began an intensive effort to improve North Carolina's
rivers for boat shipping. The Neuse River program called for clearing of obstructions
(both man-made and natural), removing shoals, straightening curves, and maintaining a
consistent channel depth from the mouth upstream to Goldsboro. Between 1878 and 1919
Congress appropriated $457,250 for Neuse River improvements, and they are detailed in
the Secretary of War's reports to the U.S. Congress from 1872, 1879, 1886, 1888, 1892, 1904,
1906, 1912 and 1919 (U.S. Secretary of War 1872, 1879, 1886, 1888, 1892, 1904, 1906, 1912,
1919). One of the most effective ways to maintain a consistent depth was to build jetties
that steered the current to the middle of the stream and "naturally" deepened the channel.
In 1878 the project constructed five jetties "at the long, straight reach immediately below
the town of Kinston." The jetties were constructed of wooden piles and sheet metal and
averaged 100 feet long. In 1886, 121 lumber jetties (a total of 12,402 feet long) were
installed in the 5 miles between the "southwest blockade" below Kinston and a point
called Becton's Old Fields. As described above, trying to find a point on the Neuse River
using the distances and landmarks found in the older sources is problematic, but the
project area may have been in this stretch of the river. While these structural features do
not fit the description of jetties, they could have been related to the Neuse River
improvements. The most important information is that the Secretary of War's reports
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
17 of 21

include fairly detailed descriptions of much of the Neuse River, yet none specifically
mention any structures or bridges in this area.
Deed research did not find any evidence of a structure next to the bridge. Research was
able to track the chain of title back to 1937, when Z.V. and Bessie K. West purchased a 32-
acre tract from the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Lenoir County Deed Book [DB]
164 pg. 2). In January 1959 the Z.V. and Bessie K. West lands were divided amongst their
heirs and a survey map was filed (Lenoir County Map Book [MB] 7 pg. 56). (Figure 19 is
the 1958 survey map showing the project area.) The estate included two "farms' located
on the west side of the Neuse River, one on the north and one on the south side of N.C. 55.
The project area is within the boundaries of "Farm #2," consisting of 32 acres on the north
side of N.C. 55. Within Farm #2 it was part of Lot 62, an 11.4 acre tract of woodland that
stretched from the west bank of the Neuse west for approximately 1,833 feet. Lots 61 and
60 were smaller parcels located on the west side of Lot 62. The map in Figure 19 does not
show any structural features in the project area. In January 1959 Keith and Louise L.
Williams purchased Farm #2 (Lots 60, 61 and 62) from the West family (DB 475 pg. 318).
Roy Ivy Garris purchased the land from Keith and Louise L. Willhams on July 15, 1960
(DB 478 pg. 212). The Garris family had inherited the land from Roy Ivy Garris when he
died intestate on June 28, 1964. On May 1, 1967 Wilby Garris Cole and her husband,
Roland J. Cole, were conveyed the land by Wilby's siblings and mother (DB 574 pg. 654).
Most recently Lot 62 was gifted to Rodney Earl Cole by Wilby Garris Cole in February
2006 (DB 1457 pg. 804-806). None of the deeds described above mention any structural
features in the project area.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the proposed bridge replacement has little potential to impact any
archaeological sites. Background research found that there are no previously recorded
archaeological sites in the vicinity, and historic maps do not show any structures in the
project area. The maps show a bridge at this location by 1902, and research found that
another bridge was built in 1919. The current bridge was built in 1937. Visual
examination of the project area identified landforms with a low potential for prehistoric
archaeological sites. The areas around the bridge and road are poorly -drained, swampy
land. The reconnaissance identified several concrete structural features in the northwest
quadrant of Bridge 20. Their age, origin and purpose are unknown, but they are most
likely the remains of the 1919 bridge.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
18 of21

?QQ. JAN. iQ 1959
'
x!r±2-,,, I"
-� • FM �1
I1z 9e r °l
NORTH CAROLIHIt
HALIFAX COUNTY
o w $ Ia%'
S W.'rRhAe"Pt BEING O!lL1�WRH Gorr* ar.+in
w 15.d3 :
l�
NOUN
r cenotr Coar+L7
SAYS; THAT Hk-13 A R_GrSYEFEEr I.RTID r r•
%
y'
SURWYOR AND THAT 0V 10 DAY GO:
i
JoAl. 1950 HE MADE T!IEMAP UPOf:
WHICH.. THIS AFFIDAVIT IS WRITTEN
FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE BY anz cr
HIM. AND THAT IHE SAME IS IN ALL d
{ev
RESPECTS CORRECT
�./,/'
s b—Md ed ..«n lv exen m.
saAff- cs�
Airs
_ rv.r •s�r�
',-1 _ RoW7 e,5ro
r.P.P1.7 7!f P
.
�..•mm�ee e.y.n_� 19
err.. r.r 1. s
7a ra m : A{.a
,•
n
.'
err (p
��r,lA, •
i
4
] { 1
Sp 9
Ta fT�✓F ♦,
•
M f0
!l a
,r
,s •J•.
9] 3L
31 .?fe
rP rd
Pr Y6
s •
{3 S
21 So
( !1
/d
!s
!3 !L
// /o
P 8
T 6 5
f�n1
3 s
.e�,reN
c��.rrrvco
` rm.r se..�s hrrr•�wm
• r. rewr .c..-r .rirr e..r_
N.C.
55
Northwest
quadrant F
If f
lox
6f^
Y f^ %/ rrj 1 ] �r�%�'] *,•
I rLyI�I I I. _ �"'� ^�.■e d3',r-.`
" Yl r�% L-. r JL� d. r l J. �4 \' 1. , r
Wd ! :i �� L •-1' ♦1rT y [or
.K ��� i! Nj�Y Ai ` a�� JL�� L-S/F�JWtlx✓F+'
fwe
f�y� L. S rt � • C:' S t , -�r1 I.0 IaAc't, [ Tr' { r �' n . �
J r }[. ' i�r �_. � - '-�_��3 � , raeoa _ � _,!� �l _ f � i �
F r�•�
l .ven•
4 I- i /43.4e.'•'+ C pwa _ry ry �,
i •� .w.vns , C'_
� ' "'•tr
• r. � � C pt/s.S' - ^^w
Wz
�4 • �II,f •P L �� t • � 4� { c e `V f C
as •,f .-E914.4'
��! (Y
� -- ara.--i � ate. re a a�
're c7xwwrc iac...cr..r.Au,r ,rreri.w,
amrr:
s w+.nv 44. r- ,E-rr,+..r .xew eerwwe.
I SELLING AGENTS
arro ra,rd,rraws At. qc reams c�.e o,.
�/ ��5 fwY e[ Nfo � !/�.rr+v �r �.s SE, �•
AUCTION
S
WAi.TER a GURLEY Co.
KINSTON, N.C.
LFigure 19: 1958 plat map of the West estate lands.
`1Uo ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED" form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
19 of 21

References Cited
Barnhill, William L.
1977 Soil Survey of Lenoir County, North Carolina. United States Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
Municipal Journal and Public Works
1919 Volume XLVI (January to June 1919)
York, New York.
Municipal Journal and Engineer, Inc., New
North Carolina State Highways and Public Works Commission (NCSHPWC)
1938 Lenoir County, North Carolina Highway Map. Accessed in March 2010 at North
Carolina Maps, http://www2.lib.unc.edu/dc/ncmaps/
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
1927 Lenoir County Soil Map. Accessed in March 2010 at North Carolina Maps,
http: / /www2.lib.unc.edu/dc/ncmaps/
United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1902 Ayden, North Carolina. 1:62,500-scale topographic map.
1914 Kinston, North Carolina. 1:62,500-scale topographic map.
United States Post Office Department (USPOD)
Circa 1910-1919 Rural Delivery Routes, Lenoir County, North Carolina. Accessed in
March 2010 at North Carolina Maps, http://www2.lib.unc.edu/dc/ncmaps/
United States War Department/ United States Army
1872 Neuse River, Below Goldsborough, North Carolina. Pp. 734-741 in Report of the
Secretary of War (Being Part of the Message and Documents Communicated to the Two Houses
of Congress at the Beginning of the Third Session of the Forty -Second Congress), Volume II,
Appendix Q. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
1879 Improvement of Neuse River, North Carolina. Pp. 704-710 in Annual Report of the
Chief of Engineers to the Secretary of War for the Year 1879 (In Three Parts). Part I.,
Appendix H-11. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
1886 Improvement of the Neuse River, North Carolina. Pp. 979-983 in Annual Report of
the Secretary of War for the Year 1886 (in Four Volumes). Volume II, Appendix L-3.
Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
1888 Improvement of Neuse River, North Carolina. Pp. 866-871 in Annual Report of the
Chief of Engineers, United States Army, to the Secretary of War for the Year 1888 (in Four
Parts). Part II, Appendix L-4. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
1892 Improvement of Neuse River Up to Smithfield, North Carolina. PP.1129-1134 in
Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers, United States Army, to the Secretary of War for the
Year 1892 (in Four Parts and Atlas), Part II, Appendix L-10. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
20 of 21

1904 Improvement of Neuse and Trent Rivers, North Carolina. PP.1481-1483 in Annual
Reports of the War Department for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1904. Volume VI: Report
of the Chief of Engineers, Part 2, Appendix M-6. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C.
1906 Neuse and Trent Rivers, North Carolina. Pp. 257-258 in Annual Reports of the War
Department for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1906. Volume V: Report of the Chief of
Engineers. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
1912 Neuse and Trent Rivers, North Carolina. Pp. 432434 in War Department Annual
Reports 1912 (in Four Volumes). Volume II: Report of the Chief of Engineers.
Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
1919 Neuse River, North Carolina. Pp. 2446-2249 in Report of the Chief of Engineers, U.S.
Army, in Three Parts. Volume II, Part 3. : Report of the Chief of Engineers.
Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
21 of 21

APPENDIX J

NCFMP and NCDOT MOA Project Review
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project TIP:
B-4926
Sch Let Date:
10/3/2022
CLOMR Case
N/A
Number:
Municipality:
N/A
County:.
Lenoir
CID Number:
370144
Project Engineer:
Casey Whitley,
PE
Project Reviewer:
Matthew
Dudley, PE
MODEL STATUS
Stream Name:
Neuse River
Route Number:
NC-55
Road Name on
Panel:
NC-55
Effective FIS
4/16/2013
Date:
4546/4556/4525/4535/4545/4555/4524/4534/
Panel Number:
4544/3564/3584/4504/3562/3582/4502
(4-16-13 for panels 3584, 3582, 4504, 4502,
Panel Effective
4525, 4524, 4535, 4534, 4545, 4544, 4546)
Date:
(7-2-04 for panels 4556, 3564, 3562)
(6-19-20 for panel 4555)
Bounding
Station 351812.0/205847.0
Stations:
Type of Study (detailed, limited, redelineated):
Effective Model on File?
Effective Model Format (HEC-RAS, HEC2, Other):
Proposed Model Format (HEC-RAS, HEC2, Other):
Detailed
YES
HEC-RAS 3.0.1
HEC-RAS 4.1.0
PROJECT SPECIFIC NOTES (pre -model review)
This project has a maximum decrease of 0.1-ft and will be submitted as a MOA type 1.
2021-08-04 SEPI Response to Comments shown below in BLUE.
2021-09-29 SEPI Response to Comments shown below in RED.
REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Drag Coefficient and Pier Shape differ in the bridge modeling approach differ between plans. In the
model the drag coefficient and pier shape k value are 2 and 1.25 in the corrected effective
geometry and revised geometry respectively. This differs between the stated 1.2 and .9 in the
corrected effective part of the narrative. Please revise either the narrative or the model to match
the correct approach.

Bridge Modeling Approach Editor
....Add...; Copy Delete bridge #
1 J
Low Flow Methods
Use Compute
f r Energy (Standard Step)
• ry-1 Momentum Coef Drag Cd F
f r Yarnell (Class A only) Pier Shape K 1.25
f WSPRO Method (Class A only)
WSPRO Variables
r Highest Energy Answer
High Flow Methods
C Energy Only (Standard Step)
Pressure and/or Weir
Submerged Inlet Cd (Blank for table)
Submerged Inlet + Outlet Cd
4,8
Max Low Chord (Blank for default)
OK Cancel
_ Help
ter to add another bridge coeffident set.
Response: The submitted model was reviewed and we believe the reviewer was reviewing data
from an incorrect bridge (not the NC 55 crossing in this project). There are a total of seven (7)
bridges in the Neuse River model for Lenoir County. All 7 bridges use the values shown in the
screenshot above in the Effective model (Cd=2, K=1.25). Based upon field observation (see photos)
and the proposed plans, we felt it would be most accurate to correct these values to Cd=1.2 and
K=0.9 for the Hwy 55 bridge to reflect circular / semi -circular piers. We did not feel it was
appropriate to make these changes outside of the B-4926 project area. Bridge modeling approach
was not corrected/revised for any other location.
Please review the comment, and verify the correct bridge was selected when this error was noted.
No change has been made to the narrative or model in response to this comment.
It was verified this comment was based on the wrong bridge. Confirmed NC-55 only uses the
updated values. No additional action required pending review of additional minor comment #1
below. If the intended project area extends to include additional structures, any known deficiencies
within the project area from the Duplicate Effective model should be corrected.
Resolution of minor comment #1 revised the reported project limits. The suggested limits included
the railroad bridge at IRS 249780.9, so the maximum submergence ratio was revised to 0.98. Once
that change was made, the project limits extended upstream to other bridges. Each time a bridge
was updated, the project limits extended further. This was mostly based on tie in of the floodway
profile. Ultimately, the project limits were extended upstream to IRS 351812.0, and included the
bridges at IRS 278765.8, IRS 265071.1, IRS 258355.0, and IRS 249780.9. The only change made was to
the maximum submergence ratio, as no other known modeling errors exist at any of these
structures.
It appears the project area extents included consideration of tie-in of WSELs for the floodway
profile. As stated in Minor Comment 1, the project area extents only need to extend to where
there is WSEL differences between the corrected effective and revised 100-yr profiles (not
floodway). If there are floodway encroachment modifications, those sections should also be
considered for impacted project area. As submitted, the project area is acceptable, but much larger
than necessary. The updates to the submergence ratio for the additional structures would not be

needed if the tie-in requirement was not confused. However, those adjustments are acceptable
and since implemented, do require the project area to extend through those structures. No
additional action required.
2. If possible, please resolve the negative surcharges for the Corrected Effective and Revised plans at
265071.1BR U #1, 265071.1BR U #4, 265071.1BR D #1. The Revised Plan also has an additional
negative surcharge at 213729 BR D #2. Please note if the project area is updated to not include this
structure, no adjustments will be necessary.
If we interpret the comment correctly, it appears the reviewer is referring to the increase in WSE of
the 100-FW profile at RS 265116.5 (upstream of Bridge at IRS 265116.5) when comparing CE and
REV plans? Additionally, we interpret the last sentence directs us to update the project area on the
FEMA coordination form and is not suggesting that we truncate the model. We looked at updating
the project limits. However, there are changes in the published values (rounded to the tenth of a
foot) as compared to Effective for the area previously listed. We are considering both 100-year
with and without floodway as published values. The project area could be revised if only 100-year
was considered. The 100-yr w/out Floodway ties in to Effective at IRS 373613.0 (U/S) and IRS
205847.0 (D/S). Either way, the areas noted are within the project area.
An attempt was made to resolve the increases in 100-FW, but at a point we felt like further changes
could not be made while utilizing good engineering practice, revising geometry in locations outside
of our project area (and scope), or revising the underlying assumptions built into the Effective
model (such as study -wide n-Values, modeling approach at bridges outside our study area,
encroachment locations well outside the project area, etc.). Ultimately, the conditions of the MOA
are tied to project impact on the 100-year profile (w/out Floodway). All requirements appear to be
satisfied, and therefore none of the attempted changes were incorporated into the project models
for this resubmittal.
As for the same condition noted at 213729, we could not determine what the comment is
referencing. At all locations in/around this structure, the REV profile remains below the CE profile.
We had attempted to show this previously (MOA review prior to work suspension in 2019) by
provided interpolated values on the BFE comparison form for locations where cross sections differ
b/w the two plans (due to new bridge location upstream of existing), but the previous MOA
reviewer asked us to remove these lines from the form. Please review the comment, let us know if
we're misunderstanding something, and we will be happy to make the revision. For now, we can't
determine any change is necessary.
Additional Comment. . his original ...mment was worded poorly and the review team apologizes
for any confusion. As noted below in Minor Comment 1, only the 100-yr profile in the Corrected
Effective and Revised plans needs to be considered for identification of the project area. If the
project area is limited to the suggested stations (207977 to 253195) the comment for the multiple
opening structure at 265071 can be ignored. If 265071 is in fact intended to be within the project
area, the original comment was intended to request (if possible) resolution of the floodway
surcharges over 1.00 at the internal sections for openings 1 and 4 at BR U and BR D.

REVISED
River Sta
Reach - 1
25K71.1BR U #1
100-year
38.57
4897.4
5122.2
4857.5
5182.29
Reach - 1
255471.1BR U #2
100-year
39.33
4897.4
51222
7056.31
7157
Reach - 1
255471.1BR U #3
100-year
38.54
4897.4
5122.2
8422.9
8227.49
Reach - 1
255471.1BR U #4
100-year
38.53
4897.4
5122.2
8553.1
8774.79
Reach - 1
255471.1BR U #1
100-yr FW
44.4E
1.39 4845
4897.4
5122.2
9114
48575
5182.29
Reach - 1
255471.1BR U #2
100-yr FW
44.1E
4.93 4945
4897.4
51222
9114
7056.31
7157
Reach - 1
255471.1BR U #3
100-yr FW
39.54
4 4945
4897.4
51222
9114
8422.9
8227.49
Reach - 1
255471.1BR U #4
100-yr FW
44.21
1.58 4845
4897.4
51222
9114
8653.1
8774.79
Reach - 1
255071.1BR D #1
100-year
39.57
4897.4
51222
4857.5
5182.29
Reach - 1
255071.1BR D #2
100-year
39.13
4897.4
51222
7056.31
7157
Reach - 1
255071.1BR D #3
100-year
39.54
4897.4
51222
8422.9
8227.49
Reach - 1
255071.1BR D #4
100-year
38.53
4897.4
5122.2
8553.1
8774.79
Reach - 1
255071.1BR D #1
144-W FW
44.4E
1.49
4845
4897.4
5122.2
9114
48575
5182.29
Reach - 1
255071.1BR D #2
144-W FW
39.9E
4.83
4845
4897.4
5122.2
9114
7056.31
7157
Reach - 1
255071.1BR D #3
144-W FW
38.54
4
4845
4897.4
5122.2
9114
8422.9
8227.49
Reach - 1
255071.1BR D #4
144-W FW
39.9E
1.43
4845
4897.4
5122.2
9114
8553.1
8774.79
The second portion of the comment was intended to request (if possible) resolution of the floodway
surcharge over 1.00 at the downstream internal bridge section for opening 2 in the Corrected
Effective (not Revised) plan.
CORRECTEII
Reach
River Sta
Profile W.S. Elev Prof Delta WS Enc Sta L Ch Sta L Ch Sta R Enc Sta R Sta W.S. Lft Sta W.S. Rgt
Reach - 1
.213729 BR U 41
100-year
34.42
4853.79
5134.E
4705.38
5177.27
Reach -1
213729 SR U #2
100-year
34.47
4853.79
5134.6
5645
679E
Reach -1
213729 BR U #1
144-yr FW
31.41
4.99
3147
4853.79
5134.6
8554
4704.64
5179.01
Reach -1
213729 BR U #2
144-yr FW
31.47
1
3147
4853.79
5134.6
8554
5645
679E
Reach-1
213729 BR D#1
100-year
34.41
4853.79
5134.6
4746.38
5177.26
Reach-1
213729 BR D42
100-year
34.44
4853.79
5134.6
5645
679E
Reach-1
213729 BR1)#1
144-yrFW
31
4.99
378E
4853.79
5134.6
9554
4704.65
5179
Reach-1
213729 BRD#2
144-yrFW
31.45
�
378E
4853.79
5134.6
8654
5645
679E
Thanks. We appreciate the clarification on the comment. As stated in the previous response, the
upstream project limit had to be revised to RS 351812.0.
An attempt was made to get the greater than 1.00-foot surcharges out of internal bride cross
sections by adjusting the encroachment stations, but a solution was not found. Since these were all
internal sections, and the reported surcharge for the cross sections (not the individual openings) are
1.00-foot or less, we assume this is acceptable. Ultimately, no change was made from previous
submittals other than the correction of weir flow maximum submergence ratios.
Verified, no additional action required.
MINOR COMMENTS
Please verify the selection of the published sections upstream and downstream for the project area.
The project area should only include the reach of stream impacted by the project (water surface
elevation differences) or where model adjustments from the effective were made. Please update
as appropriate.
The project area was determined considering the following:
• Upstream:
o The last change from Effective is at RS 379304.0 in the 100-FW profile
o Project tie in to Effective is at RS 386444.2 in both 100 and 100-FW profiles
• Downstream:
o The last change from Effective is at RS 207977.0 in both 100 and 100-FW profiles
o Project tie in to Effective is at RS 205847.0 in both 100 and 100-FW profiles

No updates were made to this section of the coordination form.
Additional Comment: I he identification of WSEL changes based on the project should be
determined using the Corrected Effective and Revised 100-yr plans/profiles only (not
Effective/Duplicate Effective plan or floodway profile). However, if modifications to the floodway
encroachments are performed beyond the limit of 100-yr WSEL changes, the project area should be
extended to encompass those changes. Based on these criteria, the project limits could be reduced
to 207977 to 253195. Please confirm and update as appropriate. If a larger project area is
intended, the Corrected Effective plan should include any corrections to known deficiencies from
the Duplicate Effective plan including as noted above, possible drag coefficient/pier shape revisions
and max submergence on other structures if determined to be incorrect.
We apologize for the misunderstanding. Project limits revised. Please refer to earlier responses to
comments in this document. Once we updated maximum submergence ratios for upstream
bridges, the project area continued to propagate upstream until we finally got a tie in at IRS
351812.0. We are not aware of any issues regarding drag coefficients and pier shapes at any of the
upstream bridges where the submergence ratio variable was updated. Therefore, no other model
changes have been incorporated at this time.
As stated in comment 1 above, there appears to have been confusion on the use of the floodway
profile for WSEL tie-in requirements. As submitted, the project area is acceptable, but much larger
than necessary. The updates to the submergence ratio for the additional structures would not be
needed if the tie-in requirement was not confused. However, those adjustments are acceptable
and since implemented, do require the project area to extend through those structures. No
additional action required.
2. Please confirm the Panel Numbers listed on the coordination form. The Panel Numbers do not
include other panels that are inside the published sections upstream and downstream. Please note
above Minor Comment #1 when addressing.
Panels updated to include the following:
4546 / 4556 / 4525 / 4535 / 4545 / 4555 / 4524 / 4534 / 4544 / 3544 / 3564 / 3584 / 4504 / 3542 /
3562 / 3582 / 4502
HUUILIU[Idl w1111Hciit: If adjustments are made to the project area based on Minor Comment 1,
please update the affected panels list as appropriate.
Based upon resolution of minor comment #1, the panels have been revised to remove 3542 and
3544. All other panels listed above still apply (based on our understanding of the comments
provided).
Verified, no additional action required.
3. Please state in the narrative that a change of max submergence from .95 to .98 from duplicate
effective to corrected effective was applied in the model.
Statement added in Corrected Effective Section of narrative.
Verified, no additional action required.

NOTES FOR NCFMP
None
FINAL DETERMINATION:
This project is recommended for approval as a type 1 project.
10/14/2021
Matthew B. Dudley, PE, CFM
ESP — Project Manager
Date
'.WjI4I�fro
rrr {{
I10
_ E =
r
}�r►���r �w�ti����
A0