NC0056561_Permit Issuance_19961118

State of North Carolina
r
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ' ` 3 ©e ?,
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary p E H N R
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
November 18, 1996
Mr. Albert B. Matthews, Town Manager
P.O. Box 339
Maggie Valley, North Carolina 28751
Dear Mr. Matthews:
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NCO056561
Maggie Valley WWTP
Haywood County
In accordance with the application for discharge permit received on May 30. 1996, the Division is
forwarding herewith the subject state - NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following redeipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the office of Administrative Hearings,
Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such a demand is made, this
permit shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. Part II, EA. addresses the requirements to be
followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required
by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act, or any other Federal or Local governmental permits may be required.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Mark McIntire,
telephone number [phone], extension 553.
Sincerely,
Original Signed BY
David A. Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Central Files
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA
Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permits and Engineering Un'
Facility Assessment Unit
Aquatic Survey and Toxicology Unit
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Permit No. NCO056561
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended,
Town of Maggie Valley
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Town of Maggie Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant
off of US Highway 276
northeast of Maggie Valley
Haywood County
to receiving waters designated as Jonathan Creek in the French Broad River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, I1, lI1 and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective January 1, 1997
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on November 30, 2001
Signed this day November 18, 1996
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit No. NCO056561
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Town of Maggie Valley
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate the existing 1.0 MGD Aer-O-Mod system consisting of a bar screen, flow
meter, effluent disinfection via gas chlorination and sulfur dioxide dechlorination, located at
Town of Maggie Valley WWTP, off of US Highway 276, northeast of Maggie Valley,
Haywood County (See Part III of this Permit), and
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Jonathans
Creek which is classified Class C-Trout waters in the French Broad River Basin.

`� r -✓ /f- Gag)
y ' : �'' ` � erg HT
37,
tn
,Cove -eM N �d4
Greek2615
k Holiness _ _ r r _ : Oa i:eCh. 4L
Suttontov►n ; _ _ -- eti� y 44
- j--Howell Gem � ,
l ^ I^-
O \
n
SA
.714
.. t-ligh Tc p
s _ V-
- -'�— ,.
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
PRIMARY HIGHWAY LIGHT -DUTY ROAD. HARD OR
HARD SURFACE IMPROVED SURFACE
SECONDARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE C=31N1C= UNIMPROVED ROAD
Latitude 35°35'56" Longitude 83000'23"
Map # E6SE Sub -basin 04-03-05
Stream Class C-Trout
Discharge Class 100 7( Domestic
Receiving Stream Jonathan Creek
Design Q 1.0 \9GD Permit expires 11! 30/
SCALE . 000
000
CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET
QUAD LOCATION Town of Maggie Valley
NCO056561
% Haywood County
WWTP

A. O. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NCO056561
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until May 31, 1997, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the pertnittee as specified below:
Efi_I_uent _Characteristics
Flow
BOD, 5 day, 20°C"
Total Suspended Residue"
NH3 as N
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Chronic Toxicity —
Discharge Limitations
Monthly Avg. Weekly Avg.
1 .0 MGD
30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/l
30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/I
200.0 /100 ml 400.0 /100 ml
'� Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent
Monitoring Requirements
Measurement
Sample
'Sample
Daily Max Frequency
Tyne
Location
Continuous
Recording
I or E
3/Week
Composite
E, I
3/Week
Composite
E, I
3/Week
Composite
E
3/Week
Grab
E
28.0 ug/1 2/Week
Grab
E
3/Week
Grab
E
Quarterly
Composite
E
Quarterly
Composite
E
Quarterly
Composite
E
** The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15 % of the respective influent value (85
% removal).
*** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 6%; January, April, July and October; See Part III, Condition E.
Tile pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 3/week at the effluent by grab
sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

tiC0056501
E. Chronic Toxicity Limit (Ceriodaphnia, Quarterly Pass/Fail)
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is 6% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document).
The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance
with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from issuance of this
permit during the months of January, April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing
shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27606
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be
reopened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting (within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 16, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dave Goodrich
THROUGH: Matt Matthews -ice
FROM: Kristie Robeson
AZ -
SUBJECT: Draft Pernut Corrections:
Allied Signal Fibers
NPDES Permit No. NC0001899/002
Chatham County
Town of Maggie Valley
NPDES Permit No. NC0056561
Haywood County �' <
Our office received the draft permits for the subject facilities on October 7, 1996.
Our review found errors on the condition pages for the subject draft permits. Part III,
Condition F, in the draft permit for Allied Signal Fibers shows that five toxicity tests shall�'�
be performed on the discharge from outfall 002. After performing those five tests, a
toxicity test will be performed annually. Our records show this facility has conducted '""'` I.A,
seven toxicity tests all with LC50 values > 100%. Therefore, our office recommends
changing Part III, Condition F to require annual toxicity testing.
In addition, Part III, Condition E, in Maggie Valley's d1yaftpgr4lit states that "the
effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity in y two co secutive toxicity
tests..." This language does not reflect the new permitting , effective October
1991, which eliminates all references to two consecutive toxicity tests. This condition page -
also contains an incorrect address for the Environmental Sciences Branch. Please find
attached, the appropriate condition page to be used for Maggie Valley's permit.
We appreciate your assistance to undertake the necessary steps to correct the
existing draft permits and incorporate the recommendations cited above. Please feel free to
contact me at 2136 if you have any questions.
cc: Larry Ausley

Comments and Summary
NC Division of Water Quality
Permits and Engineering Unit
September 5, 1996
Facility:
Ma-gie Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant
Permit Number:
NCO056561
County:
Haywood
Flow:
1.0 MGD
Receiving Stream:
Jonathans Creek
Stream Class: C-Trout
S7Q10 (cfs): 23
W7Q10 (efs): 27
IWC (%): 6
Subbasin: 040305
Quad: E6SE
BACKGROUND: This application was received by the Division on May 29, 1996. The
wasteload allocation request was submitted on May 30 with the wasteload returned on September
3. From a compliance standpoint, this facility has been operating well, with only a occasional
violations of their fecal limit. The wasteload allocation recommended renewal with existing limits.
GENERAL COMMENTS: The current permit has a TRC limit of 31.7 µg/L. As the Division
does not limit TRC above 28 µg/L, the limit will be lowered to 28 µg/L with this renewal. The
Asheville Regional Office, after reviewing the wasteload, recommended that monitoring for weekly
constituents be increased to 3/week for the first six months. This request was made so as to
evaluate wether or not proposed operational improvements have been implemented. Effluent
monitoring frequencies have been changed in accordance with the 2B .0500 regulations for a class
II facility discharging domestic wastewater. Otherwise, the permit has been drafted in accordance
ID
with the wasteload file.
Prepared by: Aj�----

CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is LP % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after hirty days fro the effective date of this permit ditring the months of
c - <', f . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted rnal effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements..
QCL PlF Version 9191

111 L1_du TV AJ Ili LVAL ALLV<.A 11V1V
PERMIT NO.: NCO056561
PERMITTEE NAME: Town of Maggie Valley
FACILITY NAME: Town of Maggie Valley WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 1 N1GD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
100 %
0%
Comments:
Straight renewal: no modification requests at this time.
RECEIVING STREAM:7onathans Creek
Class: C-Trout
Sub -Basin: 04-03-05
Reference USGS Quad: E 6 SE (please attach)
County: Haywood
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 11/30/96 Treatment Plant Class: Class II
Classification changes within three miles:
none
Requested by: Mark McIntire
Prepared by: X'C' '
Reviewed b
Date: 5/30/96
Date:
Date:.
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Drainage Area (nut ) ,�•� Avg. Streamflow (cfs): a
7Q10 (cfs) ;3 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) )-1 30Q2 (cfs) 3
Toxicity Limits: IWC % AcutdZjronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (m )
30
NH3-N (mg/1)
J W
D.O. (mom)
fie,
TSS (mg/l)
30
F. Col. (/100 nil)
;Lo
PH (SU)
e -
�Es , Ct lam,,
31.1 �u /�
5a ,AL& 154oe �
Comments:
f�i7

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Maggie ValleyWWTP
NCO056561
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Jonathans Creek
C-Trout
040305
Haywood
Asheville
McIntire
5/31/96
E6SE
Request # 8493
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
55.8
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
23
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
27
Average Flow (cfs):
110
30Q2 (cfs):
38
IWC (%):
6
Wasteload Allocation Summary C7
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) •�
Facility requesting renewal of existing permit w/ secondary limits. In compliance with most
limits with some occasional violations for fecal coliform. Recommend renewal of existing limits-1'6�
d
Special Sch ule Requirements and additional comments from Re 'ew rs: r l�
Jet. , io Yw
`` ``
J` 'J
L
Recommended by: �j, a�L Date: 7/29/96_
Reviewed by (/ V
Instream Assessment: Date: 1 '/
Regi rvisor: Date:
Permits & Engineering: Date: .�
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
v
v
co

Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (4g/1)
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BODS (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
1.0
30
monitor
nr
30
200
6-9
31.7
Qrtrly
monitoring
Qrtrly
monitoring
Monthly Average
Summer Winter WQ or EL
1.0
30
monitor
nr
30
200
Qrtrly
monitoring
Qrtrly
monitoring
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
�12�
Parameter(s) Affected
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
X'
_X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

TOXICITY TEST REQUIREMENTS
Type of Toxicity Test Chronic Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail. Qrtrly
Existing Limit 6.0%
Recommended Limit 6.0%
Monitoring Schedule JAN APR JUL OCT
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please .provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Wasteload sent.to EPA? (Major) (Y or-N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N)..If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name
Maggie Valley
Permit # _NC0056561—Pipe #_001
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is _6_% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall
perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first
test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
JAN APR JUL OCT .. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 _23 cfs
Permitted Flow 1.0 MGD
IWC _ 6 %
Basin & Sub -basin _ FRB05
Receiving Stream -ABERNETHY CR_
County _ HAYWOOD
jo 4'7' /i ew_4
Recommended by:
7/29/96
QCL P/F Version 9191

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, -Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Asheville Regional office
Am X_? aFA
DEHNR
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 27, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mark McIntire
THROUGH: Forrest Westa
FROM: Keith Haynes
SUBJECT: Permit Renewal Effluent Monitoring
Maggie Valley WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO056561
Haywood County
Due to various operation and maintenance problems noted at
the subject facility during recent inspections, we are requesting
that the effluent monitoring requirements for the facility be
increased to -three times per week on the renewed permit for a
period of six months. It is our opinion that six months of
additional monitoring at three times per week should be
sufficient for us to determine if proposed operational
improvements at the facility have been implemented.
If you have any questions concerning this request or if you
need.additional information, please advise.
Na77
0
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place ��y� FAX [phone]
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
NVoice 704-251-6208 50% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

MAGGIE VALLEY WWTP JMN
JONATHANS CREEK 7/29/96
040305
FACILITY REQUESTING RENEWAL OF EXISTING NPDES PERMIT W/ NO
MODIFICATIONS. EXISTING 1 MGD PLANT W/ 30/30 LIMITS AND CHRONIC
TOXICITY TEST @ 6%. COMPLIANCE DATA INDICATES SOME -PROBLEMS
MEETING FECAL LIMITS HOWEVER OTHER LIMITS ARE MET CONSISTENTLY.
REQUESTED EXPANSION TO 1 MGD IN 1989. PER STAFF REPORT FACILITY
HAS EXPANDED BEYOND, 0.250 -MGD TO 0.750 MGD.
NH3 TOX ALLOWABLE IS 12 MG/L (SUMMER) AND 29 (WINTER). BECAUSE
RATED A MAJOR FACILITY HAVE ATOX TEST INSTEAD OF LIMITS. AVG. NH3
DISCHARGES IS 6.5 MG/L NOTCLOSE TO EXCEEDING THE ALLOWABLE
LIMIT.
TOXICITY TEST: OVERALL HAVE GOOD TOX RECORD; FAILS RECORDED IN
JAN. AND FEB. 1994, PASSED IN MARCH AND APRIL 1994; FAIL IN APR. 1996.
AND PASSED IN MAY 199&
RECOMMEND RENEWAL OF EXISTING LIMITS.

WI I01.Ii L'fl•LULN'1" I UXICf1'Y TDSI-INU OISLI-F-MUNITORING SUMMARY] Thu. Jun 13, 1996
YPAR IAN f9D MAR APR MAY ION tUl. Al)O Slil' (x'1' NOV hf(
FAI'll ITV
RFUOIRFMFNT
Louis Dreyfus Energy PI?RM: 2411k LCSO AC MON1T l;I'IS Irl'IID((1kAB)
92 -
-"
"'
--
-
-
-
-
•- •-
NC0021971/OD2 lk:gin:5/I05 Paaprency; SOWIVA NAP:
93 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
... ...
Co Wny:khV'kleaburg Region: MRO Sdubasim;M34
94 -
-
'»
--•
-
-
-
-
-
1 $ cial
95 -
-
-
-
--
>100.>100t
81.07
7Q.10, o o IWC(%):1 W Oakr:
96 -
87.48
-
-
Laois Dreyfus Energy Corp. PERM: 241lk AC MONIT EPIS I•TIID (GRAD)
92 -
-
-"
-"
>9a
NC'0026247/001 Oegis:8/I92 Frequency: 5OWIYA Noccomp:
93 >1001,>1001 -
-
-
•-
>/001•>1001t
>1001.>1001 -
- -
Cuumy:ciuitfarJ Rcgion;WSRO Subbasiu:C1,1`08
94 >1001
-
-
-
-
-
-•-
-
-
PF: Special
95 -
-
>1001
-
-
-
-
-
7QI0: NA IWCI%I: NA Order.
N -
>100
-
--
Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp. Penn: 24 Its LC50 ac monit spas Olu1(grab)
92 -
-
-
Passl
__
-
_.
._
-»
NCW21971/001 Begin:5/I05 hegueney: A Noacomp:
93 -
-
-
---
>100!
»•
>1001,>1001 >1001
>1001.>1001
__
... __.
Couaty:Motitkwburg keg";MRO Ssbbosio:C1D34 ,t
94 -
-
stool
._ --
PF: VAR Special
95 -
>1001
--
--
--
>100
-•
--
_-
7QIO: 0.00 IWC(U 100.00 OnW:
08 -
79.93
-
--
Louishurg \3'1V7'P Penn chi line: 13%
92 Pass
-
--
Fail
Pass
-
Pass
--
--•
Pass
Fail
••• •^
Pass
NCO020231/001 Degia:4/1/95 Fmgwwy: Q P/F a Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:Smgle
93 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
Pass
Conuty: Frasmiw Region: kRO Subbeaia: TARO
94 Pass
-
-
NRIPasa
-
-
Pass
-
Late
-
Pass
PF:1.37 Special
05 -
-
Pass
--
---
Pass
---
-
Pass
7QItr 14.0 IWCJ9;-): 13 Osdcr.
98 -
-
Pass
-
Lave Oil CwuP. PIskM CIIR 1_IM: 90%(GRAB)
92 Pass
--
•••
Pass
••-
-
Fail
Pass
-
Pass
- •-
NC007049IMI Begiu:3/103 Umqueucy: Q PfF A Jan Apr Jul (At NouComp:SINGIJ?
93 Fad
Pass
--
Fad
Pass
-
Pasa
--
-
Pass
County: Rockingham Region: WSRO Subhasin: ROAO3
94 Pass
-
-
Pass
--
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
Pass
- -
-- --
Pl':.0173 Special
05 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pau
•-•
-
7Q10: 00 1WC(%LIOO.0 Oolu:
96 Pass
-
--
Pass
I.awCII WWTP I'I'.RM 4811k AC I.IM: 74%(DAI'll OR [TRIG)
02 ---
16
---
--
<5
-
--
NR
-
-""
>90 •-
7 23.78
14C0023961=1 Bcgin:9/I193 Fmryen:y: Q A Feb May Aug Nov N acongvSINGI N
93 -
FA
-
--
>100
--
-
NRAU
34.15'
•-
22.43'
32' >100'
Couay: Quinn Region: MRO Subbasin: C11135
04 <5.6'
>90.0'
20.6'
17.92'
100'
-
-
10.51'
Special
95 -
>100'
--
>100'
.8'
>100
--
>100
--
>100
PI::0.60
7QI0:124.0 IWC(%):0.74 ().kr
96 --
>100
Lumhrrluu W%VTP PERM CIIR I.IM: 11%; UPON EXP Cilk LIM 21%
V 92 -
Pass
--
--
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass -
NCW24571/001 Ikgia:9/1/94 r c loci cy: Q PA- A Feb May Aug Nov N-Cump:SINGU?
93 -
Pass
-
Pass
--
-
-
Pass
•- _
-
Pass •-
Cuumy:Rolwaoa Regius FRO Subbasia:LUM51
94 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
--
Pass -
PF: 10.W special
95 -
Pass
--
-•
Pass
-
--
Pass
--
Pasa
7QIO: 120 IWC(%):II O kr:
06 -
Pass
•-
---
M.I. Ittilia lta-Cla(rmuul W%VTP PERM 2411R AC I'/1' LIM: W%FI'lID
92 -
-
-
•--
-
-
-'
"-
-"
--'
-• •»
NC0OS8599NOI Degin:4/29/94 1'myuency: Q A Mar Jun Sep Ilex: NonComp:SINGLE
93 -
-
-
'"
-'
'"'
Pass
-'•
NR
•-
NRIPassl
NJUPassl
-
NR/Passl
- -
Posal passl
Cosuty:Bnuaawick Region: WIRO SubbasiaXPI'l7
94 -
95 Passl
-
Pagel
- ,
Pass!
-
Pass)
-
PAW
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
•-•
Pass
PF:.10 special
,
7QIO:71DA1. IWC(%LNA 014er.
96 -
-
Pass
-
hlacclesfield W1VTP PERM CUR LIM: 90%
92 Pass
-
-
Pass
--
-••
Pass
•-
--
Pass
- - '
N00050661/001 llegin:3/I05 rtsxpcacy: Q 1111I A Jan Apr Jul Oct Noncomp:SINGI.E
03 Fad
Fail
Fall
Pass j
-
-
Fail
Pass
-
Pass
- -
Conay:lilgecuaulbs Region:RRO Sabbatia:TAR03
94 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
PF: 0.175 Special
95 Pass
-
--
Pass
--
-
Pass
•-
-•
Pass
-
7Q10: 00 IWC(%L I00.0 Ordri:
96 Pass
-•
-•
Pass
Agile Valley WWTP PERM CIIR LIM: 6% WIIIiN >.25MC71)
92 ---
--
•-
•--
•••
--•
...
--
••-
Pass
Passl
•-- -
•- -
NC'(105656I/O01 Begio:2/102 ryngnueocy: Q P/N a 1u Apr Jul Oct NonCmup;
tp Pau
-
--
Pau
-
---
Pass
--
--
OW43;J{aywood Region:ARO SuWnaate;F7kBOS
94 NFLFs/
Fag
Pass
Pa"
-
-
Pass
-
-
Late
Pau -
PF:I.O Special
95 Pass
-
-
Pass
--
•-
Pass
--
-
Pass
7W& 23.0 IWC(%):6.3 Oder:
N Pass
-
-
Fed,
Pass
Maiden WWTP Penn chat lim:I1%
92 Pass
-
•-•
Pass
•••
--
N3
Pass
--
Pass
••• -
NCW39594I001 13egin:9/105 rnclteney: Q PA' A Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:Single
93 Pass
-
---
NR/Pass
•••
--
Pass
-
---
Pass
••-
Pass
Counly:Catawha Region:MRO Subhasin:Cf11335
94 Pass
--
--
Puss
--
-
Pass
-
---
Late
-
PI':1.00 special
95 Paas
-
-•
Fad
Pass
-
Pass
Pass
•-
7QI0: 12.00 IWC(S6):II onda:
06 Pass
-
---
Pass
0 2 commutive failum = significant noncompliance V Pre 1992 Daa Available
L W4ND:
14111M = Pernrir Reipirement 1-rr1' = Administrative l,cmer - Twget Frequency = Monitoring frapuency: Q- Quanedy; M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- SemisanuAly; A- Annually; OW D- (ItJy when Jiu'larging; D- Disconlimned monitoring Wilm a:us; IS. Couducling intlepeaxbu siuJy
D.:tin =1•iru nuauJu rc<auircJ 7Q 10 =Receiving cucaun low Bow criterion (cfs) A = r nark ly monitoring mcreases a mauhly upon single failure Montlu kal scning must occur - ex. IAN,A1'k,J(II.,OCr NonComp = Cusnent Complinu:e R.'Jui na'nt
INr =14rnuiueJ Bow (M(iD) IWC%= Instream waste conxuuration PAr-;ras/Fatl chronic test AC = Acne CIIR = Chmoic
Itaa Notation: f - Fahc:d Mimuow: • - CCrioJaplmia so.: my - Mvsid shrimp: ChV - Chronic value; 11- Monahav of ameJ perceaaac at hialeal concentration; at - 11crGsnrwf by DEM Tux lied Group: bi - Bad test
Ftapatmg Nwaion: - Ikea
- = ea notretpuircd; NR - Not reponed; ( ) - Beginning of Quaver Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive, N - Newly Issued(fo to "mcl); 11 - Active but wA discharging; t-More dwa available for month in question I = ORl' signnaturo naeJcJ

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT:
IF YES, SOC NUMBER
TO: PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ATTENTION: Mark McIntire
DATE: June 25, 1996
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
COUNTY Haywood
PERMIT NUMBER NCO056561
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
Yes No XX
1. Facility and Address: Town of Maggie Valley WWTP
Mailing: Post Office Box 339
Maggie Valley, NC 28721
2. Date of Investigation: October 26, 1995
3. Report Prepared By: D. Keith Haynes IF
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Al Matthews
926-0866
5. Directions to Site: THe site is accessed via a private
road off of US Hwy 276, located approximately 0.3 miles
south of its intersection with I-40. THe facility is
on the east side of Jonathan Creek.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 350 35' 56" Longitude: 830 00' 23"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and
discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. E6SE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Dellwood, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
X Yes No If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Relatively
level, not in flood plain.
Page 1

9. Location of nearest dwelling: >1000 feet
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Jonathan Creek
a. Classification: "C-Trout"
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 040305
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream
uses: Agriculture and wildlife.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted (Ultimate
Design Capacity) 1.0 MGD
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater
Treatment facility? 1.0 MGD
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current
design capacity 0.750 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years:
NA
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities: Existing
facility is an Aer-O-Mod system with bar screen, flow meter,
effluent disinfection (gas chlorination), and sulphur dioxide
dechlorination.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment
facilities: NA
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: None
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): NA
in development approved
should be required not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit Number WQ0010615
Residuals Contractor NA
Telephone Number
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP X OTHER
C. Landfill: NA
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
Page 2

0
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): III
4. SIC, -Codes (s) : . 4952
Primary Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code:
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds
or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)? NA
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: y
NA
3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate) NA
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications ,
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all
of the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional
perspective for each option evaluated. NA
Spray Irrigation:
Connection to Regional Sewer System:
Subsurface:
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items: NA
Page 3

PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the Permit go to public notice and barring
any substantive adverse comments, be issued as.proposed.
Signature of R port Preparer
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Date