20150296 Ver 1_401 Application_20150315

ISAACS
C:)
CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN & LAND SURVEYING =
8720 RED OAK BOULEVARD, STE 420
CHARLOTTE, NC 28217
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
TO NCDENR- Wetlands Unit
Mail Service Center 1617
Raleigh, NC 27699
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE 3/20/2015 JOB NUMBER 14209
ATTENTION Mrs Karen Higgins
RE Vickery Subdivision
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under Separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Disk ❑
❑ Applications
COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION
1 Stormwater Management Plans
1 Low Density Supplement Form
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
For approval ❑ Approved and submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ Resubmit
❑ Submit
❑ Return
the following items
❑ Specifications
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
REMARKS
Karen, These plans have been submitted to you per the direction of Mr Alan Johnson in the Mooresville
regioinal office Additional information regarding the wetlands impacts will be submitted to you indpendently
from our wetlands consultant (Len Rindner and Amanda Jones), and these drawings are to supplement their
data Please let me know if you need any additional information from me to process your review
r915
MITIlNG
COPY TO SIGNED Brent Cowan

Permit No
(to be erotic y D_ R)
State of North Carolina - w'
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
° `'
= -i
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources ?_1 C"'
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM'aPfl
LOW DENSITY SUPPLEMENTL
This form may be photocopied for use as an original �- -�L_ —�o
A low density project is one that meets the appropriate criteria for built upon area and transports stormwater
runoff primarily through vegetated conveyances Low density projects should not have a discrete stormwater
collection system as defined by 15A NCAC 2H 1002(18) Low density requirements and density factors can be
found in Session Law 2008 -211, 15A NCAC 2H 1000, Session Law 2006 -246 and the State of North Carolina
Stormwater Best Management Practice Manual Curb and gutter systems are allowed provided they meet the
requirements in 15A NCAC 2H 1008(g)
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name VICKERY SUBDIVISION
Contact Person Brent Cowan. P E Phone Number ( 704 )227 -9402
Number of Lots 55 Allowable Built Upon Area (BUA) Per Lot* 6,500 sf
Number of Dwelling Units Per Acre ** 2
Low Density Development (check one) ❑ without curb & gutter ® with curb & gutter, outlets to (check one)
® Swales ❑ Vegetated Area
*If lot sizes are not uniform, attach a table indicating the number of lots, lot sizes and allowable built upon area for each lot.
The attachment must include the project name, phase, page numbers and provide area subtotals and totals BUA shall be
shown In units of square feet
* *(Phase II Post - Construction [non -SAI only)
II. BUILT UPON AREA
Refer to DEMLR's forms and applications website for specific language that must be recorded in the deed
restrictions for all subdivided projects (http / /portal ncdeni orb /,�N-eb /lr /state- stormwater -forms does)
Complete the following calculation in the space provided below where
• SA Site Area - the total project area above Mean High Water
• DF Density Factor - the appropriate percent built upon area divided by 100
• RA Road Area - the total impervious surface occupied by roadways
• OA Other Area - the total area of impervious surfaces such as clubhouses, tennis courts, sidewalks, etc
• No of Lots - the total number of lots in the subdivision
• BUA per Lot - the computed allowable built upon area for each lot including driveways and impervious
surfaces located between the front lot line and the edge of pavement
• Total allowable lot BUA - the computed allowable built upon area for all lots combined
• Total BUA from lot listing - the sum of built upon area allocated for each lot on the list of non - uniform lots
Form SW401 -Low Density -Rev 3- 2/10/09 Page I of 4

For uniform lot sizes:
(SA 2,170,996 ft2 x DF 024)—(RA 121,572 ft2) — (OA 19,149 ft2) = BUA per Lot = 6,915 ft2
(No of Lots 55)
For non - uniform lot sizes:
a. (SA ft2 x DF _� — (RA ft2) — (OA ft2) = Total allowable lot BUA = ft2
b. Total BUA from lot listing sf b must be < a
III. DESIGN INFORMATION
Complete the following table If additional space is needed the information should be provided in the same
format as Table 1 and attached to this form Rainfall intensity data can be found in Appendix 8 03 of the State
of North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual or at
http //hdsc nws noaa gov/hdsc /pfds/
Tnhle 1 gwnle de-,ion information haled on the 10 -vear storm
Del
Swale No
Drainage
Area (ac)
Impervious
Area (ac)
Grassed
Area (ac)
C
Q
(cfs)
Slope
N
Vatlow
(fps)
Vactual
(fps)
Flow
;De th (ft)
iP
095
058
037
070
467
600
500
431
055
i$
071
033
038
060
299
500
500
388
052
16
205
105
100
063
903
280
500
3 89
088
10
081
037
043
060
341
280
500
299
057
1
286
1 32
1 54
060
1206
400
500
480
093
a.
164
076
088
060
692
270
500
3 95
090
3
442
205
237
060
1864
290
500
476
120
1 83
085
098
060
772
1 200
500
3 30
089
5
0931
043
050
060
392
500
500
3 83
0 53
6
1 16
054
062
060
489
360
1 Soo
3 63
063
7
118
055
063
060
498
160
500
271
077
049
029
020
068
239
220
500
249
051
133
052
087
055
514
250
500
321
070
Fonn SW401 -Low Density -Rev 3- 2/10/09 Page 2 of 4

• IV. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the North Carolina Administrative Code Section 15A
NCAC 2H 1000, NCDENR BMP Manual (2007), Session Law 2006 -246, and Session Law 2008 -211
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found An
incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information. This will delay final
review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to indicate that the following requirements
have been met and supporting documentation is provided as necessary If the applicant has designated an agent
on the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form, the agent may initial below If any item is not met,
then justification must be attached. Only complete Items n through p for projects with curb outlets
Page /Plan
erosive velocity (for this flow requirement into wetlands, non - erosive 1s velocity < 2 ft /s)
Initials Sheet No
Swale detail and permanent vegetation 1s specified on the plans
p g p P
JL?A_' a t
For projects in the 20 coastal counties Per NCAC 2H 1005, a 50 foot wide vegetative buffer
m
is provided adjacent to surface waters For Redevelopment projects, a 30' wide vegetative
�( n tt
buffer adjacent surface waters is provided
Ra 4 y �j b
For HQW or ORW projects outside the 20 coastal counties A 30 foot wide vegetative buffer
C s _
is provided adjacent to surface waters
c fi
For Phase II Post - Construction projects All built upon area is located at least 30 feet
t Projects in the Neuse, Tar - Pamlico, Catawba River basins, and Randleman Lake may require additional buffers.
landward of all perennial and intermittent surface waters
9-Ell C-11 d
Deed restriction language as required on form SWU -101 shall be recorded as a restrictive
covenant A copy of the recorded document shall be provided to DWQ within 30 days of
platting and prior to the sale of any lots
e
Built upon area calculations are provided for the overall project and all lots
c. i, a f
Project conforms to low density requirements within the ORW AEC (if applicable per
e-4.1 -
15A NCAC 2H 1007)
v5 3
/'0. g
Side slopes of swales are no steeper than 3 1, or no steeper than 5 1 for curb outlet swales
_ ��� •h h
Longitudinal slope of swales is no greater than 5 %, for non -curb outlet projects, calculations
sew c:Au%}
for shear stress and velocity are provided if slope is greater than 5%
pk " 1
At a minimum, swales are designed to carry the 10 year storm velocity at a non - erosive rate
R06-_ /_ 5 L i
Swales discharging to wetlands are designed to flow into and through the wetlands at a non-
G5
erosive velocity (for this flow requirement into wetlands, non - erosive 1s velocity < 2 ft /s)
/. 4 � �- k
/. 4;.
Swale detail and permanent vegetation 1s specified on the plans
p g p P
/8 ,7 1
Swale detail provided on plans, includes grass type(s) for permanent vegetative cover
m
Swales are located in recorded drainage easements
�( n tt
Length of swale or vegetated area 1s at least 100 feet for each curb outlet
_ cl� z b u o It
The system takes into account the run -off at ultimate built -out potential from all surfaces
oe
draining to the system (delineate drainage area for each swale)
5 • p IT
Curb outlets direct flow to a Swale or vegetated area
t Projects in the Neuse, Tar - Pamlico, Catawba River basins, and Randleman Lake may require additional buffers.
tt Only complete these items for projects with curb outlets
Form SW401 -Low Density-Rev 3- 2/10/09 Page 3 of 4

V. SWALE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1 Mowing will be accomplished as needed according to the season Grass height will not exceed six inches at
any time, and grass will not be mowed too close to the ground or "scalped"
2 Swales will be inspected monthly or after every runoff producing rainfall event for sediment build -up,
erosion, and trash accumulation
3 Accumulated sediment and trash will be removed as necessary Swales will be reseeded or sodded
following sediment removal
4 Eroded areas of the swales will be repaired and reseeded Swales will be revegetated as needed and in a
timely manner based on the monthly inspections Side slopes must be maintained at the permitted slope
5 Catch basins, curb cuts, velocity reduction devices, and piping will be inspected monthly or after every
significant runoff producing rainfall event Trash and debris will be cleared away from grates, curb cuts,
velocity reduction devices and piping
6 Swales will not be altered, piped, or filled in without approval from NCDENR Division of Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the six
maintenance procedures listed alwve I agree to notify DEMLR of any problems with the system or prior to any
changes to the system or responsible party.
Print Name and Title Mike Kissel ( Land Development and Acquisition)
Address:5615 Porter Road. Matthews nc 28104
Phone -704 -821 -8020 ext. 23 Date: ('3T b Z f Zc�l
Signature.
Note The legal! ponsibl party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the lots have been sold and a
resident of the subdivision has been named the president
Notary Public for the State of i `� , County of
I ^� do hereby certify that ' " ` k1JSe personally appeared before me this _
day of oV" ___2_ and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoingswale maintenance requirements
Witness my hand and official seal,
Q- Nvjsz
Notagignature
�1�A M •_
�OP A • q9o?
PuBIP
�%i0•• . •�'lti
Form SW401 -Low lensif]r -lt 3- 2/10/09
My commission expires Oa' go 01 g
Page 4 of 4

t#etianss and Eaviror=__ ea_tab Pfanning Group
March 20, 2015
Mr William Elliott
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Mr Alan Johnson
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ms Karen Higgins
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear Ms Higgins and Messrs Elliott, and Johnson,
Leonard S Rindner PLLC
2p15p296
Enclosed is a request to utilize Nationwide Permit #29 for the development of a residential development
known as Vickery Subdivision Impacts proposed total 128 linear feet of stream channel for a permanent
road crossing, 10 linear feet of temporary impacts to a stream channel for a utility line crossing and 0 24
acres of open water impact to a man -made pond for fill for two lots As noted on the attached plans, the
stream channel banks upstream and downstream of the proposed road crossing will be stabilized but this
work will occur above the ordinary high water mark of the stream and therefore have not been considered
an impact A detail of this work is provided on Sheet C8 7 Also enclosed are plans depicting the overall
stormwater plan which is proposing vegetated swales for this low- density development Complete plan
sets have been submitted to NCDENR -DLR for review /approval Also enclosed are 5 copies of the
Jurisdictional Waters Survey in which we request the Corps to please sign and return all copies to WEPG
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information and please contact us if you have any
questions
Len Rmdner, PWS
�F
Principal
Amanda Jones, PWS
n
Regulat` ry Specialist
11 11 "1 1 11 .. 1311111111 milli 10
Ckiarlome Office_ www wetlands -epg com Asheville Office
10612-D Providence Rd_ 1070 Tunnel Rd. Bldg I
PMB S50 Suite 10 PMB 283
Cbaafmca<e, NC 28277 Asheville NC 28605
[phone] (828) 708 -7059
fea_nndner(sjAwetiands -epg corn amanda tones gwedands -epg corn

O�O� WAT EA�G
of r
>_ y
O 4
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps
❑X Section 404 Permit
❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 29 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification
❑ Yes NX No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Vickery Subdivision
2b
County
Union County
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Stallings
2d
Subdivision name
Vickery Subdivision
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state project no
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Vickery, et al
3b
Deed Book and Page No
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Mike Kissel, Bonterra Builders
(1 [_� � r-,.3 rl
3d
Street address
5616 Potter Road
; ±� n
3e
City, state, zip
Matthews, NC 28104
9 �ILy
3f
Telephone no
980 - 333 -1038
I M/111
3g
Fax no
DEN , _,
3h
Email address
mkissel @bonterrabuilders corn
BUFFER TjNG
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1 4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify Buyer
4b
Name
Mike Kissel
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Bonterra Builders
4d
Street address
5616 Potter Road
4e
City, state, zip
Matthews, NC 28104
4f
Telephone no
980 - 333 -1038
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
mkissel @bonterrabudders com
S.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Len Rindner
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Leonard S Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c
Street address
10612 -D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28277
5e
Telephone no
704- 904 -2277
5f
Fax no
5g
Email address
len rindner @wetlands -epg com
Page 2 of 10

B
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
07075006, 0700750051, M7075005, K7075005, M70750
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 1197 Longitude -80 6504
1c
Property size
9982 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Crooked Creek
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Class C
2c
River basin
Rocky
3
Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site is currently undeveloped and predominately wooded General land use in the vicinity consists of residential developments
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 522
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 2,472
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the project is for development of residential structures and access /road crossing
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
Road crossing will be constructed using standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc Culverts will be placed in stream Fill will be place
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)
Agency /Consultant Company WEPG
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
A site visit was conducted by William Elliott on November 11, 2014 to review /approve WEPG's delineation The final jurisdictional determination
request and necessary paperwork is being submitted with the permit request
5.
Project History I
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past9
El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑X Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b
Type of impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
2g Total Wetland Impacts
2h Comments
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type of impact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to N Fork Crooked C
INT
Corps
5
128
S2 T
Excavation
UT to N Fork Crooked C
INT
Corps
5
10
S3
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
138
31 Comments
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indiv ually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
Impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of Impact (acres)
01 P
North Fork Crooked Creek
Fill
Pond
024
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
024
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then Individually list all buffer Impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
Impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Road crossings were minimized to only one needed to access the site which is located near the main entrance off of Stevens mill Road The main
entrance to the site was dictated /set by NCDOT and the property is narrow in this area which leaves little opportunity for shifting the road /lot layout
Stream channels also traverse the entire property in this area so a crossing could not be avoided The applicant evaluated a bridging /spanning
structure but would cost approx $200- 300,000 If pond impacts do not occur, two -three lots will also be lost and could not be re -gamed other ways
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
The culvert length have been designed /sized to safely accommodate anticipated residential traffic but minimize the area of impact of existing surface
waters The culvert has been designed to cross the stream channel at a perpendicular angle and avoid downstream wetland impacts The lot fill
associated with the pond is the minimum necessary to make the lot buildable The remaining portions of the pond will be left undisturbed
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
El Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes ❑X No El
buffer mitigation
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What Is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
23%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
An
overall plan is provided Full /complete copies of the plan have been forwarded to DENR -DLR for stormwater review /approval The plan proposes
diffuse flow through vegetated swales as the development is considered low- density The plan as proposed as been designed to meeting the
guidelines /requirements for approval
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Stallings /Union County
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction Is this project?
Stallings /Union County
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑X No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - Implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1 4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter )
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑X No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
No development in this surrounding area is expected to be initiated /planned because of this development There are no additional property or phases
associated with this development
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via installation of sewer lines
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
-
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Professional knowledge of threatened /endangered resources in the area No habitat for potential species exists on site
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No Essential Fish Habitat in this region
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http / /gis ncdcr gov /hpoweb/
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Information provided by Engineer Development has 100 -year floodplain located on property but proposed construction is not located within the 100 -
year floodplain
Amanda Digitally signed by Amanda Jones
ON —Amanda Jones
Amanda Jones for WEPG
ou= Leonard S Rintlner LLC Wetlands
PLLC W
B ail=anmentalnes@ Planning Group
manda tones wetlands
Jones
03 -19 -2015
opg co
epg com -US
Date 2015 03 19 15 07 02 09 00
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10

Wetlands and Environmental Planning C,,--w
Agent Authorization Letter
Leonard S Rindner. PLLC
The purpose of this form Is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as Identified below, do hereby authonze associates of
Leonard S. Rlndner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name.
Property Address.
Stevens Mill Road
Stevens Mill Road
Parcel Identification Number (PIN)- multiple PINs (see attached JD Submittal Form)
Select one: I am an interested buyer /seller
Name: Mike Kissel
Company: Bonterra Builders
Mailing Address: 5615 Potter Road, Matthews, NC 28104
Telephone Number: 980 -333 -1038
Electronic Mail Address: mkissel @bonterrabuilders.com
Interested Buyer* / Other"
Date
* The Interested Buyer /Other acknowledges that an agreement and /or formal contract to purchase and /or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory
Charlotte Office www wetlands -epg com Asheville Office
10612 -D Providence Rd 1070 Tunnel Rd, Bidg i
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville NC 28805
(704) 904 -2277 (828) 708 -7059
ien.rmdner @wetlands -epg com 2 amanda tones @wetlands -epg com

N
C
cd
N
a
c�
a
Maps /Plans

Q
a �+
K
s
cK ,51
0
s
i
Q
m
N =
DN 3U
K i
0 3 m s s s
R u
� 8a
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 u
Jr a
z> >
U U
rn N_
m m
� z
S $ s $!
0 0
S2Sii i
0
z
N
v
o_
m
Q
0o as
a
aaa a
off^''
J
K V N S
U U U
S S S
Q1
>
N H N
N
�_
W
tw
o j w 3
Ln
iii
two
9 =� i
>>
>>>WW WW
N
w
Ln
Q o
?
ppp Q p Si
a 8♦
p a
O n G
r _
�l N
C h O JN9 m Al
O h
P N t
ry r
v
c
�Z
Q.0
N =
DN 3U
K i
0 3 m s s s
R u
� 8a
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 u
Jr a
z> >
U U
rn N_
m m
� z
S $ s $!
0 0
S2Sii i
0
z
N
v
Q
0o as
a
aaa a
off^''
0
•J
n N N fJ
mm
M
N H N
N
�_
W
tw
V
N
N
v
iii
�Z
Q.0
Y
+>+
fC
C
S
o
K k
i
U
V1
C7
U
N
CL
2 I
ca
O
Q
ss
s
sus=
c
ox I
o
c
v
w
y
>>W
0
n W ozQ
wow
W
@SO V 0
OFI
N$ NF i
O
n
n N h
1�1
H N
�i
L
O
N =
DN 3U
K i
0 3 m s s s
R u
� 8a
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 u
Jr a
z> >
U U
rn N_
m m
� z
S $ s $!
0 0
S2Sii i
0
z
N
v

FIGURE NO. Bonterra Builders
W Vickery Subdivision
3 pa I Union County, NC
AERIAL MAP
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
HAC LSR
DATE:
12/31/2014

00,,�`
i
1
.`
4
_v SITE 1 f
< _
ti ti
UNNAMED
BRANCH OF
CROOKED CR. _ �I
+- P
LOCATION USGS QUAD a` ,
Lat: 35.1197 2N Matthews, NC
Long: - 80.6504 2W ACRES SCALE
.� HUC:03040105 99.61 1:24,000 +
AILR;ghEt Reserved Mot For I avigat- N
FIGURE NO.
4
Bonterra Builders
Vickery Subdivision
Union County, NC
USGS MAP
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
HAC LSR
DATE:
12/31/2014

00- v --
1'�'J �
wiad� and &Wro""w" manw-f &,a*
Leonard S- Rwidner. PLLC
[e-mail]-m
(70+)'90+ -2277
www.v4edwxb-sWcom
4tb
14�
ScA
Th
•

r.
is Jl
CD
_0
(1)
3: w
(3)
'5
Qj
cl-
co
u
m
0
411 1
MTN
0 LL-
0 4-
V)
a) 4- 0 , ` �111 - ,
4-
_0 Y
-0 U
•z ro 0 Y sue_
M
Cl)
S.
m LL 0
ILK
a
0
z
w t
-
CL
+L
E
X
tka CL
5 0-
M <
z *
!rA%
co
4'A
0
1
411 1
MTN
0 LL-
0 4-
V)
a) 4- 0 , ` �111 - ,
4-
_0 Y
-0 U
•z ro 0 Y sue_
M
Cl)
S.
m LL 0
ILK
a
0
z
w t
-
CL
+L
E
X
tka CL
5 0-
M <
z *

/
Site Verified By
\
USACE 11 -6 -14
r
Non - Jurisdictional
- JJ
WETLAND E
ate`'.
Gully/Swale e
0.05 acres
i
s
t.
,
tNon-Jurisdictional '
Gully/Swale
,1
SEASONAL
/
RPW F
.......
,
375 LF
0.074 acres
UPLAND DATA
FORM (DP2)
WETLAND DATA
FORM (DP1)
Existing Pipes
i
`,`��
WETLAND C
1 s �►
0.07 acres
•��
UPLAND DATA
SEASONAL
,
FORM (DP4)
'
�
RPW K3
PERENNIAL
'
169 LF
1
I
RPW B
WETLAND DATA
f
0.027 acres
1509.5 LF
FORM (DP3)
,
0.356 acres
!
_
\
WETLAND H
O
0.38 acres
I
0
Existing Pipe
SEASONAL RPW I
55 LF
SEASONAL
0.009 acres
.:., ..
RPW G
363 LF
l.............
.:.�..�::::.:�:::
•
acres
/
OPEN WATER
WETLAND J
0.02 acres
POND A
0.73 acres
Vickery Subdivision
Drawn By:
Reviewed By:
FIGURE NO.
UNION COUNTY, NC
HAC
LSR
8
DATE:
-
DELINEATION MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
11 -7 -14
\
"`
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION
/

,y
I
I
I
I
I
�"
-�
; P CEL iD �D7M91
I DWGLA�91 SH mw
I Da .i11,APC ee
I
I
I T
I N 293Y4r E
VICINITY MAP N T 5
DEVELOPER 80NTERRA BUILDERS
CONTACT MIKE KISSEL
EMAIL III kLwlOBDntermBullds-
ADDRESS 5815 PORTER ROAD MATTHEWS NC 28104
PHONE [phone] EM 23 FAX [phone]
CARL ENGINEER /SURVEYOR THE ISAACS GROUP P C
CONTACT OREM COWAN P E
EMAIL beowanOlmocogrp-
ADDRESS 8720 RED OAK BLVD SUITE 420 CHARLOTTE. N C 28217
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
Tom
Pm Eamm qo
D B 63ee 0.PG�32Y e
PARCEL ID 07075008. 070750051 M7075005 K7075005
PARCEL ID M7075005D K7075005D
PARCEL ID 07075005H
PARCEL ID 07075005E
PARCEL ID- 07075008 80
OWNER BONTERRA BUILDERS INC f
ADDRESS 5615 PORTER ROM WTTHEWS NC 28104 1�
IDNE%
PHONE 704 - 821 -6020 EXT 23 FAX [phone] lFItL1AlE)
APPRDX 2BT AC FROM OUTSIDE
EDGE a SS EASEMENT TO CREEK
CENRRUW TO BE DEDICATED TO
THE TOMW Of STALRrOS FOR THE
OEVMOPMENT OF THE T -4 CROOKED —
CFEIX TRAIL TINAI..M T AND
LOCATKN dF IANU RILL BE
--------- APPROT4D 0Y THE TOWNS ENC&,EER -
0rt N 393241 E IB32C
AE
)y�l
. VICKERY SUBDIVISION
zom D)075014A'00
� 005 ai
i COMMERCIAL s TOWN OF STALLINGS, UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
v
SHEET INDEX DEVELOPMENT DATA
— __ __ _ ` 10 SITE BIT ZONMO TOWN
NOTES �ON OF STALLINGS
_ C 2 E%ISBNC GDNDIRGN/DE3AOJTIGN PLAN COUNTY TARPARCEL. 070780058 07076004. K7076006D
p . repo — _ ( �� - Cl 2.0 -C2 2 SITE PLAN
' > P S II I \ C2.3 LANDSCAPE PLAN M7074005D K7075005. M7074006
I / CAS \ CSO -CJ Z ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 07075008 07074706E
i I LOT 26 C4 C40 -C41 ROAD PROFILE 89 AC. OF PARCEL 0)075008 -80
LOT 14 Ii LOT 15 ��' (' At
! a ' ; \ / A C50 STORM MANAGEMENT PLAN
# TOTAL PROJECT M M RPAGE. 4954 IBC ' / I &7� /{$ / De zu C5, -CS3 CRADINCPLAN
/— YOr411E0 p_p \ i C80 STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AREA. 6.70 AC FT
TORM PROFILE mIN LOT N/C y1 !USED PESIDEN1uL \ ,er C7 Ce 0 -1 C77 2 EROSION CONTROL PH 1 K W SNOWIt 100 T
TIP (TIM) 1 1 a \ i C7 J -C7 6 EROSION CONTROL PX 2 Fr
/\ ` \ .�- I! \ LOT 27 �'f \ EN4RN0 POND \ C78 -C77 EROSION CONTRO. ROME CONSTRUCTION YARD- 12 FT
S LOT 25 WL 6711 \ CBA-CB 7 STANDARD DETAILS R SPECIFICATIONS SIDE ' F 41,4r q PROP STp� ��� CORNER LOT SIDE YARD 22 FT
T♦•a' 'T,'^ r , // OT(73) T% / / / ` 1\ i ♦ IJRI LOT AREA 20000 SF (R -2p REGULATIONS)
NUMBER OF LOTS SNOWW 55 Lois
h
a ♦' , t • rty • ~ RPpP(11p j 7 % /i.� ` `1 ,` �' TA y 1 ♦ COS REQUIRED ABLE 6 -1 LOS % 170.996
r' }✓ T ,^t Iti , a \ I \ \\ 11 LOT 28 \ / 0 ) aB5 (2. SF) 498 AC s.F
LOT 16 I I 1 1 ` / COS PROVIDED, 0( jCIJAANG 471AC.3DE4GTED M GREENWAY)
LOT 24 FP It 1 \ TREE SAYE RE12UpEA1EM 10% X (2.170998 SF) - 217,00 SF
LOT 12 / �{,/ \ \ I I I I I 4b' - 498 AG
( r /C NEAAND TREE EWE REQUIRED 0081 BE ALL—TED
t f ( { cl \� ATE LOCH AREA 'C / , M THE 15 731 AC OF COS.
L� ( NILE NIL f i�
LOT 17 / LOT 23 I I I NI AC. i �/, sw4iwc TOTAL ROAD LENGTH 4222 LF
s • g SAE \ / y 1 F� �� 1 I /:"� a m D)D)sols TOTAL PROP RDADS RAW AREA 2,7 789 S F (0 489 ACRES)
. t�
AT OFLOT it dT i' / /OQ. / J / LOT 29 / j/' �IS.,D a . - PROPOSED ROM RAW' OmiCATI0N. 21,296 SF (5.00 ACRES)
� \ \
•/��}w�" 'i 10 07074X!8 \
8a1�CEm \ sT ' 'ng10 \ \ � '� v' USED- RF90EN11IJ. iuP[mnOL_ AA . e, nn Alt°
LOT 18 a 04Oagp �S f, je' /\ \ \ PARCEL. W 9O a /\ f IMPEtM0U5 NSA OF ROADS 121 672 E F (2 7B M )
LO 22 / / / /; S/ K9° .D IMPERVMUS AREA OF SIDEWALKS 19148 S. (OK AC.)
/BEOI/' T 6oN1TRj�PS. LttG / \ t�'
�' A /LOT 10 / XY :I/ / ,,.bR,°,P/'� \
LOT 30 bb G 826 \ IMPERNOUS AREA PER LOT 8.600 S.i (0 15 AC)
/' ,.i� `w/ J/ "^"" `T'P+l '/ 9-20 \ \ LOT 36 \ / TOTAL IMPERVIOUS ARE (aa LOrs} a eoo(6S) - 367.600 S.F (a z1 AD)
I"' TOTAL IMPEfMWS AREA 498,22, sF (11 u M)
l / / f 2 / \ \ /c \ \ / / / i I i PERCENT IMPERVIOUS. - 22951E < 24% (WN IMPACT DEVELOPMENT)
LOT 19 ~ ( LOT zt / / \ -, \ \ \ \ / X soxs. Teen s SDA
` 1 I I I Uhl ° ✓ / \ / / / `( / LOT 31 WATERSHED- CROOKED CREEK
LOT 35 �t j �I 4g 1 99DU.RI0,1FNrs PER TOWN uDo-
ILOT 9 IANDSGPINO/BUFFFR REWI�YQIIE (SECTION »
( LOT 20 LOT 34\\ \ / / \ y - STREET BUFFER (779) - 20 ALONG THE EDtEET FRONTAGE
\ tto.5 A 3r60D.w32 I I LOT 33 ` �•' / \ \ �O I g
' A 6 - PEI61EEiER BUFFER (779) - REFER TO BUFFER TABLE ON THIS SECTION
tluE 0.' I smEET i i I 2- (SECTION
STREET IXDEINO FWURES WALL BE PLACED AT 400 M 800 FOOT
\LOT 37 \ g 00 INTERVALS AND AT ROAD INTERSECTIONS.
y `/ 3. DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PARK SAND RECREATION USE SEDTIDN 10 4 1.2
ONE
\ TREE (1YP) ® 1 ` X LOT 49/'r - `\.-\ L `/ % •�, / \ \ \ // / '. / i / 4' I I \ - AY401 W
AREA TO D_ FD A(435))ROF ACRE ER NO TWIT z AF
y / 1 T - c.__�- �✓ 9,OV \ LOT 38
y }�_-r- i gy GREEMVAY AREA REQUIRED - * X 43560 % 55 LOTS - 88.451 SFVI.57 M
LOT 50 // \ - --(- -- -(� \ / ' / j% ' e ' GRLENWAY AREA PROVIDED - 297 M > 1.57 M OK
1CTDcex \
LOT N� )1 / / \ \ \ T / LOT 48 I -� - 6L �pifS LOT 39 \ \ % / I I S NOTES
PRCP [/9019s AC. �(1�')� \ \ S7 ' Q,/✓ \ \ / 7/ I �,T — \ \ \\ /y / `✓ / / / `�� i , THESE PLANS WILL BE FOR ROAD GRADOq ONLY LDT GRADING wRl BE
` — — • ./ LOT 51 S/ \ / I \ LOT 40 \ \ / / '4 I I I PERMITTED SEPARATELY BY BUILDER AND LGM WILL BE GRADED ON A LOT BY
j I \
STA. 1 \ I I LOT Brsis.
} ! I LOT 6 / ! \ \ Si m \ \ / } , Lora LOT at \ \ Y F r / 4dC Pa ��D)rD>x1a' 2. IMPLRJICIM AEA SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED M BE BUILT WITHIN THE BUFFERS
_
3. ANY FO.IDIG WITHIN THE 100 -11t FLOODPIA01 WILL REWIRE A CLOMR AND
'A;O _ .i _ w 8833 iGTIJ.
-�"'"- � s 3T39 47 w . 1a � / — � 5 � / /' $ � �RE�EH,IAL � , �•
LOT 46
h \ 9 M r_`______________1_a
W I LEGEND _ EJOSRNC R
LOT s I I n \ice / / / \ \ \' J l '�� / LOT 43 PROPOSED R w
• LOT 45 .Y' / /r / I —w— E70STING WATER UNE
K707544 \. 1 1 O'g '^
EXISTIN G GAS LINE
R c
RIP 4} EXISMG STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
3B ' ` ' , ' ,4 b 0�w x xt7rsax m a i I I
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
LOT 4 2 EXISTING O\ERNE POWER LINE
D
r Z014D• R-20 / I
USED. RESDfl,,AL / w,R -AO D)D)xtes I PHASE START COMPLETION EXISTING FENCE
P ..R, W COS, r I 1 MARCH 2015 OCT 2015
'IF a tI LOT 44 ✓ P° 82A 424 AC/ tt "� /' Da :se.)ti n1 I 2 NOV 2075 MAY 2ota G'DS PROP COMMON OPEN SPACE
p i�SEAA;•T1NA(.` - '` >Ah�`)' 250 x.(9497 ACRES) / j 71NED' R -20 I 3 AUG 2016 FEB 2017
.....5:.r`" t' TtpN,G`I� -F 'BE _ _ _ _..�� ` �r,�,L f +I.fi '� I / usEU RE9DENnAL i ® FEMA FLOODWAY
�" ..� -rr�_ ik .x�' i` L) \ _F �- rawr^�- '�..._ r..,.,•= = ���r -a .- � �� 1 ym�
T)2Y8 E td2 QQTFE� / i 3'�L'R�+'�ir� FEMA ,00 -YD- ROODPWN
S MTN IY _____ ___ _______�c` --
tsG13• /
QtEENWAY DEDICATED AREA
/D -G-717 I /' _ I JO STREAM BUFFER
BUIUUtER e NDSOw°sa -e I -------- PROPOSED SDE
/ 135ss .RIO
{ 08994 o Da oc °D) I _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSED UDLLtt ESMT
_- -- _ - I _ _ _ _ *a ZONED R -20 I xOrs�w ID -s min — _ _ _ PROPOSED SEWER EASEMENT
V / ER V4V RESIDENTVL
W, 2
EXISTING POND
I, --
L I&xo
AUi i
133 r
TBM
14 REBAR
EL 649 42
I �l i� I/ LOT 53 ZONED, R -20 ,�Y yy,�� TREES
LOT 3 I I I �) -- r - -__J URP RESIDFNTML %`T..Z APPROXX STREET 0C.
I 15 MIN FROM PROP STREET LIGHT
zaNex I:A. (SI I 1 I E.S \ELL �� Stie�ECT �P n� # PROP STREET LIGHT
U81m4 w0 OEM 2e )R �
IIICTINCK 34 9E18ropt MID- FPE - MINIMUM ROOD PROTECTION ELEVATION
R,� Alamo D)Dnood s unnr a mAwxw uoo 50' Pu D RAW s umm
54 $ Roro I rAmm REE
EASDIDrt vwP xTIO[T T
LOT
II m I a s�i E°ACUi I 1 (Mw 25 (I.Wa) � Ou TaN a swuxw uoo)
LOT 2 II I I 201ST} R -2o �-
- USED RESIDENW I 13- -0 S-0
1 1I �' P1M11W NNK
A I1 A IOU No70)sony
— — I ° ou�EnOpy ra"mr
PROP OSTDP SKw I LI iIJ I LOT $5 3 /e ^_E7 3/B- p'R Fr
..�1Ay¢� t ) PROP STREET PROP 41 YILtY D��TD w ��
0 sto 84606 I JuolT (TYP) j '// — CIMR/9URD1 �i6L -B 6�1 RFFT A=e n sEae 9Mn TMb{ amlGtic w.l!(
Cpg (Ppf 1p4N W 9)NMND9 UDD) 1 1 �� OtW+ U (e• TRKK a OID n)
�3D• L — —. 0083 AC I .�/l -OR Awno Tw wx mr ma110 _
GRAPHIC SCALE VICKERY SUBDIVISION
�
101AR 4 59 'Qp 24p n UNION COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
MAIN
FESS/ NEW
THE ISAACB •� 2 Qp0 0 7 SITE EXHIBIT
STE An /(fj - - - = i B,DH _ ,DD FEET
A WN�C 720,10) 524% ENONEERINOk SEAL Ede 142(9 -MOWC Dins 12 14 P. E ABC
80 PUBLIC R _ 028462 NO BY OATS RENSION A /7/
POSTED SPEED 45MPH W R/W TO BE 9URVE1'w0 - 9 1 TER ;«E fi ABC
OEOCAlEO 117 NCOOT NO C -1080 ` Y 3 5 PER TONAL 6 5rAWNGS COMMENTS W G7
STA 5135.11 R',.� qZ/, fNGINEE? <_.� _ ,� ISAACS p DrvPn BX RER
STEINS MILL RD C, ,'''h,7 \p` ''' q�NY B O'� \` _ +l�'r" O! ANO y Stec 1 .t00
srxO moo N OF A V � h 1,11
BEGIN NCKERY DR p11FI11100 8720 RED OAK BOULEVARD SUITE 420 1 O
CHARLOTTE N C 28217 Cl
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
ry \xo °°.. com- v.nu. \vN..n sw°iwu� i.sps \E.gx...n.q \Como Dn ..°. \cvmm \�. °DI -n°ND s /e /sD�e . is I) ru ..o.mo. i i

I, , ,ter
ao coo, IIKiI `ror .` 1a, 1�11�
\ ^^ ` qq , Iln, , r 1 I11j1 1 111 16 6 7 ��dr /
` I,111 ry�`I \�`TI ,� , 1 1 , 1 11111111111 \ 11 ��\ 1 /
t acl,,l Orb 1 1 h .� ". 1te,tt t �� -� -, r, 11
AREA E, /44
1 rltl,,,r� t, It'},l I II t n ` �- ,� �Irr'��4
-677 /r1 11 It'i 1 ii4�1 �, �p,t1
J i 140111 1 1`\11 \ ` l ., I ! ItIIr 111
�► , I�I1, 111,�rI c_` cr .,n1,1r'011IW,�it,�I, _'u;- ^6r�� �.IIJIo \
I I f r .675", r r, r l , c - - �o " IS SEASONAL \
I I IIIIII�I\` �i iii \
,� / RPW —F
11 140\�` t
I OD. 1 1 t I , t % t .` �6) ^v, - .,`Orir I l r I, y �l� t , 1 `t , _ � _ ,, r �`, r` I
1 t 1 t
.6Q 'O III 1i1 1�`��♦ ,`O "= �, y1 1 It
\ �_ i -,Lon r,
\��.N >` `��`����yy,,� �i�EA °L,e. - ''���'DiiNl/ �d`�t� �..�r�.:.,rr,r�'cl I /
`.663: � =
It
ll,�t \, ��° r °55� /
✓ \�`� �ot\` \ ` `J ` r 1 rO'� �'.��I� .` O ier�. ,�,'1riy• 6 1 /
7r - ,,` �`�` , t 1,
`11';,; i,_ �` _ ;��: O,,rr SEASONAL
sus` _ _
1 1111 r In ` \�'r _� _ `I r 11 'j- ` 1, I RPW -K3
1564. r,1�1 y'_ �tD�T / ' i
b E-k PERENNIAL -
\� 8 ,, / r
r
i�6q �t .`111j 1 10' 1 rr/''.E. It�l`11��`.RP
`,rr;rlh�o
6q1 � \~ \,, 1 tom` ` � �sJ
\` `�
�\
IN, if
\ - ' -644
a. •r�
WL AREA "H" / 4
C �\
X16 4776461
642\
DI D WL R
WL AREA OPEN /PO "A" \ Q0
GRAPHIC SCALE
2�0 0 100 200 400
1 INCH = 200 FEET

\
lfulwr-
7:
"o- -
r REA
-6771
II .� I I\'ll ; .../
\
$7�. 1
/ ; I
= - --co �• SEASONAL N
li'r�dtgll
1
RPW -F
- /
SEASONAL
RPW
/ -K3
PF- ENNIA
U,,—, ' r -'_ - -
,�^a •
` I
s �;� \ ` \ ` `s ;•;'
%;
; TREAM IMPACT AREA "A
SEE SHT. *14.0
Nr
>\
45. `�\♦ +/` �
/t \�t�tt \�\\ /\ lllL /,i.
e
\
WL AREA "H" _/
Q-
10
6
I
�az, ,
POND IMPACT AREA "B"
'
'`, %
SEE SHT. W13.0
DI T DWL RA "J"
WL AREA OPEN /PO "A"
�4
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 100 200 400
1 INCH = 200 FEET

Y �
I / �
1
FILL EXIST. PON
%(A=10,670 SQ. FT.
0.24 A
'EXIST. WETLAND AREA "H"
- (16,567 SO. FT.)
/
Iv
�1 \ EXIST. POND "A"
(31,770 SQ. FT.)
�\n 648 - -- `.647 -_
-
\I _644 -
oo a / � 00, \ .
RF)�i 3
\\\ — 2
I � v
DIS PEI) AI7 A;
` -642- , v
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 30 60 120
1 INCH = 60 FEET
I / 1
I I
I �
,
I\, I

r
EXIST,. PERENNIAL
TE`vIPORARY "S*EAI IMPACT STRE�A-M "A" -
. h 1 LF FQR jINSTALLATION , - '(RPw� SEASQ%u4�
\, & �UNbERGRPUt D UTILITY,
C.O.S. I .\ cA , All
it
co
r
r
4 �
r
Ge11R-
i
I 5 `� 9 PROP. COIR
BER ROLL
PROO. TURF
REINFORCEMENT, MAT'i
- Lo �� ` • PROP. H,W =P1 '
PROP. CB —H2 I TOP HW =648.169
I
PROP. � -66" CMP
ALUMINIZED STEJ IPA
PROP. FES -Hl a ,
,/ r ! I • r f
�' P - H1M�P2 ; \
HX=6 1,13.51
\\ II
� ` t
cam. \
I iiu�,� PROP. 20'
PROP. \FES -J1
P OP. CBS J2 so�
PROP. STREAM IMPACT 128 LF FOR
INSTALLATION OF 2 -66" ALUMINIZED STEEL p° *t.
PIPE CULVERT FOR STREAM "A" CROSSING VII
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 INCH = 40 FEET

6
I� CV 00 DD 00
� Ln LC) Lf) (D (O
c0 co c0 cfl cD �
STA- ��sfl ��
1
I
I
1
f
I
I
f
EL 650 14
�• 30 00
l
'
LENGTH. 100.15'
LOW PT. STA 4 +78 91
LOW PT EL 650 50
m I
�
I m
660
660
N N
W
w
to
I
I
2
w
VI �
w
(n U
U
Z
j m
j ''"'
I
O I
I
l O
m
�
af
�
w
0-
(1
I I
w
f a
PROP GRADE l
1 f
z
w
�-
f
o
� I
I I
I
� I
I I
�
w
I
Q
a
>
U
1n
I
650
Q
LLJ
EXI T
T GROUND �
�
w
PROP -
-66" ALUMINIZED
STEEL PIPE
40
640
4 +00
5 +00
6 +00
Project
VICKERY SUBDIVISION
UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
VICKERY
DR. PROFILE
GRAPHIC SCALE
O File # 14209 -PBDWG Date:
11/11/14 Project Egr
ABC
ISAACS
C) Design By
40
0 20 40 80
O Dam By
ER
CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND LAND SURVEYDIG� Scale.
1• =40•
1 INCH = 40 FEET
8720 RED OAK BLVD STE
CHARLOTTE, N C 28217
420 rr
W� ^�O
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
V
6
I� CV 00 DD 00
� Ln LC) Lf) (D (O
c0 co c0 cfl cD �
I I
f
f a
PROP GRADE l
1 f
f
� I
I I
I
� I
I I
I
EXI T
T GROUND �
�
PROP -
-66" ALUMINIZED
STEEL PIPE

658
656
654
652
650
U
Z
648
w
w
z
O 646
F-- w
Q 644
U
V)
LLJ J
I Q
W 642
w
640
636
635
........................................ ...............................
PRO. GRAD
O��
N N
c0 cD
It �
-0 +50 0 +00
VICKERY DR. CULVERT CROSSING
X- SECTION A -A'
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 INCH = 40 FEET
0) m
rn rn
It --t
(D cD
1+00
2 +00

CHANNEL
z
BAF -FL-E- ACROSS ENTIRE PIPE TO
ACHIEVE PRIOR ELEVATION
BAFFLE HEIGHT
EXIT BAFFLE DETAIL
PIPE DIA =66"
ALUMINIZED STEEL CMP
VIEW LOOKING UPSTREAM
BAFFLE HEIGHT
INTERNAL BAFFLE - SEE TABLE FOR HEIGHT
AND OFFSETS ALONG PIPE LENGTH
ALTERNATE BAFFLES EA SIDE OF PIPE
INTERNAL BAFFLE DETAIL
CULVER
MINIMUM
EXIT BAFFLE HEIGHT
INTERNAL BAFFLE HT
IBAFFLE OFFSET DIST
DIAMETER
AMOUNT
BURIED
(ENTIRE WIDTH)
(WIDTH IS 1/2 DIA)
(ALONG PIPE)
>/ =48"
12"
12"
14"
8' TO 10'
CULVERT AQUATIC LIFE PASSAGE PIPE BAFFLE DETAILS
(FOR 66" ALUMINIZED STEEL CMP)

M
>o U a a
':m= p� t�
� �- m V GROUP
N 1.
CL
f EUJ¢ atlo d Y' Q k Yo °<
13HH'17
LJ
Q
t3
o _ E! ~ 3
zl
w`i °�N� �$ w
�a N N
<a
a
� 6 _
O Q m
H
l W
K
ik
,1
\ � v
�y a
m
m cn I ��eee a j m
R < r Q J¢ \ Z �sW Pi 1 °y i O
wo WE
in D
i^ n
1 U
1 � � IL el
C m Ld W $d° gk
o N
w w i d al
�o Y N °
'E
a
6 R& P
=se
a °ate 87J
gs
zo
Ana a g
ill- _ %w s -wta8
zi
X ;3
° � W
� e <
0
Bl W
f/1
i
9
J
8 ° W
°
a ICI III _��� . �OAGCAGACIIAGIIAACGCCIIAAACIIA�II D■ncrC■n�GIIAAACA0A7I1B0A0901I@ E
` ��6CCIIG9CG16CIIEC�I6000I�CG1 ©�'
rater ��
- OCL=16E133�EIEE��IEG�1'
III
I I
` - a
N o m
NM jL
Q Z o$g
ZI
2 lag 3t! 81 0
R E= U a g
Blum
E N /
060EI�GI�CI�CIECB61BG�01EEG1 'I
i6W
��

N
i
i
N
a--+
E
I-
0
cn
Stormwater Plans

VICINITY MAP N T S
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
I PMr11 q D)D>Bm,
I De xPDm
I
I
I
I �
APPROX. 207 AC FROM GUTSDE
EDGE OF SS EAS LENT TO CREEK
CENTETUNE TO BE DEDICATED TO
THE TDNR OF STAUJIMOS FOR TIE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE T -4 CROOKED
CREEK TRAIL FINAL AMOUNT AND
LOCATION OF LAND MIA. BE
- APPROVED BY THE TOWS ENGINEER. - OP -N 3P3241 E 4912tl -_
TIE i
THE PROJECT SITE 15 LO ATED IN THE TOWN OF • `/ 1 1 '�CyQS / ro u
APPROXIMATELY 4984 ACRE PARCEL ALONG STEVENS MILLS ROAD (A A
STALLINGS ROAD) IRE PIWOSEV PROJECT CONSISTS OF FIFTY Fans (55)
Da :ai RMO�. \ APPROXIMATELY 1/2 ACR_ TATS WITH PUBLIC ROADWAYS DESIGNED IN
gym, R_M ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN, STAWNGS Q NCDOT REQUIREMENTS THE
PROJECT AREA DRAINS RI THE CROOKED CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN
N USED RESIDENTAL
VEGETATED CONVEYAN ��` ', \ E7051WG FXWD NATU AI 1
R J1A
/"• +j'.`S�'4 `R4 �.}. _ f X15 6711 RCES I'NTffRY.
TYP AL
THE PARCEL IS HEAVILY 'NOODED WOH MIXTURE OF HARD WOOD NID PINE
LEONARD S RDIDNER PUIC HAS PERFORMED A SIREAMRWERAND
DELINEATION /STUDY AND MNFIRMED WITH THE U S ARMY ODRP OF ENGINEERS
THAT AN EXISTING SEASONAL RPW F EXIST THAT BISECTS THE PROPERTY
PERENNIAL RPW B (CROCKED CREEK) RUNS AIANG THE SO UIN PROPERTY
LINE AND THERE ME AL:�O SOME ISOLATED WETLAND AREA PRESENT ON SITE
EXISTING ON-SITE EXISTING SOIL TYPE INC.AIDE AA MURURE2OT0� PERCENT ON C AND AND CAROLINA HASPEPERFO� THE HYDROLOGIC GROUP CE ATC TESTING TO TO
R� r �D }M iwPRmnIEA'tEfAOC,)fi ' %- (q3"'� i, ..✓, g _ _ _ _ r. i ,,�'rAREA. / f/ _ ESTABLISH SOIL SIIITABIIlIY FOR PROPOSED ROADWAY AND NOME
CONSTRUCTION
rAkI
MR SO WI-1 STORM WATER MANAGEq(QjL
Ye y } ( ' ZONED R -10 THE PROPOSED PROAECT SITE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO SATISFY THE
USED' RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAW LAPACT DEVELOPMENT (LESS THAN 247E IMPERVIOUS)
PER SECTION WATER ORDINANCE. �THE' RM RUNOFF SHALL BE COLLECTED IN CONSTRUCTION STORY
_ . _ _ _ COMBINATION OF GiRASSEI3 SWALES AND CATCH BASINS ALONG THE PROPOSED
/� RIMS PIPED STORM DRANAGE WELL BE MINIMIZED AND GRASSED SWALE WILL
/( 4°t, 5 ' <'j '� G� BE UTILIZED AS MUCH AT POSSIBLE TO CONVEY STORM WATER RUNOFF ALL
'� OUTFALL FROM THE PIPE NETWORK SHALL BE DISCHARGE TO AN OPEN
CHANNEL AND DISPERSE[ BEFORE ENTERING ANY REQUIRED BUFFER THERE
WILL BE ONE CNAET LN REEK CROSSINGS THAT WILL BE PERMITTED FOR
WETLAND IMPACTS THROU;H THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE NORTH
W CAROLINA DIVISION OF WINTER QtIIN.iTY THESE PROPOSED CIHET LN ULVERTS
VEGETATED CONVEYANCE) , ' I WILL BE DESIGNED TO MCOMMODATE THE 100 -YR STORM EVENT LOW
DENSITY DEVELOPMENT DIES NOT RFAIARE A STORM WATER TREATMENT NOR
DETENTION TO CONTROL ENE STORM WATER VOLUME
� ` 1 N�� i I i ' LEGEND
♦ V ! I TOTED EXISTING R/W
T ROPOSED R/W
IXISTMG WATER LINE
TASTING GAS LINE
IASRNG STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
�A O _ -- -- -- , E XISTING PAVEMENT
1\ ` `� . f - �P- EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
,W": «� �' TI", ~ ``C \ �' L - - _ - - - _ - - - "- , t' " ✓<- ✓, / '� NR i b -A- E )OST[N FENCE
,� I ' �', �' I � ' , 1 '/I ' 11 ?•1���� a _ _ _ a�,'° ..�',�� �'rl /f ,Rj , i I I I CRS. PROP COMMON OPEN SPACE
\ CONVEYANCE)
TEMA FLAODWAr
:oTp I t_tnA IEMA 100-YR FLOODPWN
yy DB 254 I
ZONED' R -20 I
'�BPu
' -!' _ ✓'
' e USED _TIM.
I REENWAY DEDICATED AREA
A CE Y
TED CON I
- ____ -_- _
_ -_1 %' - !r'I, � - - -- 31 STREAM BUFFER
V VEGETATED ,CONV£1'ANCE r �r : ' �w _ `�` •S�y ✓/ SA' - �" SO 5 '// PROP STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
•` SM { 9) `� , - .'("' - ' _ ' , 04 ' / I -------- PROPOSED SDE
r �), T n ✓ r .es5 .,yf= ; -1,fj / } P� I _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSED U71UTY ESMT
n As PItOP05ED SEWER EASEMENT
PROP CATCH BASIN
'c`E!�3,,.i. ♦ �� _ . / ` �, '`_! ✓. ' GD yam/ ',J� . USED RE9RHTML / M gmDZSmaE I ® PI'OP DROP INLET
CE '{ice-- 1= �+°�5��. - -T ' 6bT„u�•' , _4,'Z4yAS /3 �d , `+ ' /// P DB sx :R .,, EnS11NG CHANNEL
M'`ct'.'.'4w.`Skv ._ <� _ �i ♦ -eta _�+'••F- I i USM RESIDENT& j
PMCn mSDTaT� AeD
di
IMAPERVDD Me � ♦I nA�QD,
\I [ # x
1S
° ZGKED C
I
111PF3TVIOUS AREA OF ROADS 121 572 SF (279 AC)
- l._ 5,
USED COMMERCIAL.
u� WI
VEl2_TATED CONVEYANCE $
EMPERVECUS AREA OF SICEMIALI6 19149 S.F (044 AD)
IMPERVIOUS AREA PER U1T B 500 S. (0357 AD ) SF 8 21 AC
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA (55 1D75i 6.50O( ) ( )
MVMM
"u„
_ _ _
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA. F ( )
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS -22 95% <24% (UAW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT)
r
WATERSHED CROOKED CREEK
_
"'g,�
_ A
PROJECT DESCRIPDON.
LQt
'A
THE PROJECT SITE 15 LO ATED IN THE TOWN OF • `/ 1 1 '�CyQS / ro u
APPROXIMATELY 4984 ACRE PARCEL ALONG STEVENS MILLS ROAD (A A
STALLINGS ROAD) IRE PIWOSEV PROJECT CONSISTS OF FIFTY Fans (55)
Da :ai RMO�. \ APPROXIMATELY 1/2 ACR_ TATS WITH PUBLIC ROADWAYS DESIGNED IN
gym, R_M ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN, STAWNGS Q NCDOT REQUIREMENTS THE
PROJECT AREA DRAINS RI THE CROOKED CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN
N USED RESIDENTAL
VEGETATED CONVEYAN ��` ', \ E7051WG FXWD NATU AI 1
R J1A
/"• +j'.`S�'4 `R4 �.}. _ f X15 6711 RCES I'NTffRY.
TYP AL
THE PARCEL IS HEAVILY 'NOODED WOH MIXTURE OF HARD WOOD NID PINE
LEONARD S RDIDNER PUIC HAS PERFORMED A SIREAMRWERAND
DELINEATION /STUDY AND MNFIRMED WITH THE U S ARMY ODRP OF ENGINEERS
THAT AN EXISTING SEASONAL RPW F EXIST THAT BISECTS THE PROPERTY
PERENNIAL RPW B (CROCKED CREEK) RUNS AIANG THE SO UIN PROPERTY
LINE AND THERE ME AL:�O SOME ISOLATED WETLAND AREA PRESENT ON SITE
EXISTING ON-SITE EXISTING SOIL TYPE INC.AIDE AA MURURE2OT0� PERCENT ON C AND AND CAROLINA HASPEPERFO� THE HYDROLOGIC GROUP CE ATC TESTING TO TO
R� r �D }M iwPRmnIEA'tEfAOC,)fi ' %- (q3"'� i, ..✓, g _ _ _ _ r. i ,,�'rAREA. / f/ _ ESTABLISH SOIL SIIITABIIlIY FOR PROPOSED ROADWAY AND NOME
CONSTRUCTION
rAkI
MR SO WI-1 STORM WATER MANAGEq(QjL
Ye y } ( ' ZONED R -10 THE PROPOSED PROAECT SITE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO SATISFY THE
USED' RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAW LAPACT DEVELOPMENT (LESS THAN 247E IMPERVIOUS)
PER SECTION WATER ORDINANCE. �THE' RM RUNOFF SHALL BE COLLECTED IN CONSTRUCTION STORY
_ . _ _ _ COMBINATION OF GiRASSEI3 SWALES AND CATCH BASINS ALONG THE PROPOSED
/� RIMS PIPED STORM DRANAGE WELL BE MINIMIZED AND GRASSED SWALE WILL
/( 4°t, 5 ' <'j '� G� BE UTILIZED AS MUCH AT POSSIBLE TO CONVEY STORM WATER RUNOFF ALL
'� OUTFALL FROM THE PIPE NETWORK SHALL BE DISCHARGE TO AN OPEN
CHANNEL AND DISPERSE[ BEFORE ENTERING ANY REQUIRED BUFFER THERE
WILL BE ONE CNAET LN REEK CROSSINGS THAT WILL BE PERMITTED FOR
WETLAND IMPACTS THROU;H THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE NORTH
W CAROLINA DIVISION OF WINTER QtIIN.iTY THESE PROPOSED CIHET LN ULVERTS
VEGETATED CONVEYANCE) , ' I WILL BE DESIGNED TO MCOMMODATE THE 100 -YR STORM EVENT LOW
DENSITY DEVELOPMENT DIES NOT RFAIARE A STORM WATER TREATMENT NOR
DETENTION TO CONTROL ENE STORM WATER VOLUME
� ` 1 N�� i I i ' LEGEND
♦ V ! I TOTED EXISTING R/W
T ROPOSED R/W
IXISTMG WATER LINE
TASTING GAS LINE
IASRNG STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
�A O _ -- -- -- , E XISTING PAVEMENT
1\ ` `� . f - �P- EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
,W": «� �' TI", ~ ``C \ �' L - - _ - - - _ - - - "- , t' " ✓<- ✓, / '� NR i b -A- E )OST[N FENCE
,� I ' �', �' I � ' , 1 '/I ' 11 ?•1���� a _ _ _ a�,'° ..�',�� �'rl /f ,Rj , i I I I CRS. PROP COMMON OPEN SPACE
\ CONVEYANCE)
TEMA FLAODWAr
:oTp I t_tnA IEMA 100-YR FLOODPWN
yy DB 254 I
ZONED' R -20 I
'�BPu
' -!' _ ✓'
' e USED _TIM.
I REENWAY DEDICATED AREA
A CE Y
TED CON I
- ____ -_- _
_ -_1 %' - !r'I, � - - -- 31 STREAM BUFFER
V VEGETATED ,CONV£1'ANCE r �r : ' �w _ `�` •S�y ✓/ SA' - �" SO 5 '// PROP STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
•` SM { 9) `� , - .'("' - ' _ ' , 04 ' / I -------- PROPOSED SDE
r �), T n ✓ r .es5 .,yf= ; -1,fj / } P� I _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSED U71UTY ESMT
n As PItOP05ED SEWER EASEMENT
PROP CATCH BASIN
'c`E!�3,,.i. ♦ �� _ . / ` �, '`_! ✓. ' GD yam/ ',J� . USED RE9RHTML / M gmDZSmaE I ® PI'OP DROP INLET
CE '{ice-- 1= �+°�5��. - -T ' 6bT„u�•' , _4,'Z4yAS /3 �d , `+ ' /// P DB sx :R .,, EnS11NG CHANNEL
M'`ct'.'.'4w.`Skv ._ <� _ �i ♦ -eta _�+'••F- I i USM RESIDENT& j
"��'f" - /�T , EXISDNC SWALE I 41414 P-P CURB OUTLET SWALE
�yyLyr (VEGETATED CONVEYANCE) I
(TYP PROP CONVEYANCE SWALE
B I"M �- -moo -si M.A4��''F ; • __
- -- - - - - -- - I
MIN FPE MNIMUM FLOOD PROTECTION ELEVATON
R-L m Dronoasr
/ u swSmN mw ) � t •' �
Boa eaawPC 20> I �/
' ' tai Z01ED R -20 I 'PMABE mME°ROns aka
• , � USED RE9DENTAL I KuSBMD wAETA n
-,��,• I SeIAMB 0 69
(�� T r --__ -J ZDNFD R -M
>y I EgST ORA`Q DRIVE suB,ECT RESDENRA ```AtN CA^Q�`/� ``V`pSN
i 2 i LISi UCESSM 'EAT SEYNCDITBMmS /'' = �`=O'T♦E ^IyVACSrt'Y''% : 20 p FE55%QS'Y
' I�•pIM
GROUP P C ,4Y
Aeon D aTm5DO4 / %T�. 1Alm �RyE1w01g - i 028482
NO C -1089 2
14 P =.
_ _ 20NEIY R -2o I // + ., '� fh, CINM�• �P`�
USED REeGmya i / '�i�RAnPt ,1•``` 'ir' "pNn81 C0`���
I� ' � M
-GE MAW
FLOOD CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT gi
LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS SHOWN ON MAPS PREPARED BY THE
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNITY NUMBER 3704725500L AND FERIA MAP NUMBER 3710550000L. DATED
FEBRUARY 19 2014
GRAPHIC SCALE
I INCH . 100 FEET
VICKERY SUBDIVISION
UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
STORM MANAGEMENT PLAN
M t 14209- PEDIIG FDM 12/3/14 1 Pmp t Er ABC
r' ISAACS A n
'\­ cPn,...,in.. \ro.4.n mmlm 111OSIV- 1+ «n I... ,, ,., RCA., , ,
e" I
I DOSTNG POND
i Jr nty" F
MVMM
"u„
_ _ _
DxPAE9EY+yp
r
0
(VEGETATED CONVEYANCE)
7YP
"'g,�
_ A
LQt
"��'f" - /�T , EXISDNC SWALE I 41414 P-P CURB OUTLET SWALE
�yyLyr (VEGETATED CONVEYANCE) I
(TYP PROP CONVEYANCE SWALE
B I"M �- -moo -si M.A4��''F ; • __
- -- - - - - -- - I
MIN FPE MNIMUM FLOOD PROTECTION ELEVATON
R-L m Dronoasr
/ u swSmN mw ) � t •' �
Boa eaawPC 20> I �/
' ' tai Z01ED R -20 I 'PMABE mME°ROns aka
• , � USED RE9DENTAL I KuSBMD wAETA n
-,��,• I SeIAMB 0 69
(�� T r --__ -J ZDNFD R -M
>y I EgST ORA`Q DRIVE suB,ECT RESDENRA ```AtN CA^Q�`/� ``V`pSN
i 2 i LISi UCESSM 'EAT SEYNCDITBMmS /'' = �`=O'T♦E ^IyVACSrt'Y''% : 20 p FE55%QS'Y
' I�•pIM
GROUP P C ,4Y
Aeon D aTm5DO4 / %T�. 1Alm �RyE1w01g - i 028482
NO C -1089 2
14 P =.
_ _ 20NEIY R -2o I // + ., '� fh, CINM�• �P`�
USED REeGmya i / '�i�RAnPt ,1•``` 'ir' "pNn81 C0`���
I� ' � M
-GE MAW
FLOOD CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT gi
LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS SHOWN ON MAPS PREPARED BY THE
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNITY NUMBER 3704725500L AND FERIA MAP NUMBER 3710550000L. DATED
FEBRUARY 19 2014
GRAPHIC SCALE
I INCH . 100 FEET
VICKERY SUBDIVISION
UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
STORM MANAGEMENT PLAN
M t 14209- PEDIIG FDM 12/3/14 1 Pmp t Er ABC
r' ISAACS A n
'\­ cPn,...,in.. \ro.4.n mmlm 111OSIV- 1+ «n I... ,, ,., RCA., , ,

C
O
C
L
Q)
4-+
t�
C
O
V
N
Jurisdictional Determination
Information

xaaac .wio.w w«m,
unm aw.oros
rermeno_ffi
b,
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
--
I
'I
_ I
— STEVENS & l[d, ROAD
I I
I I
I "I�
1 R�Ip
A
M, Ta I I I
I I
:tom• �...��.«�...� .,
.,- ----------------------
- --
art

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
[E]
Date
1/17/14 1 Evaluator I NRN
Easting
80 6504 W
Project
Vickery/Stevens Mill Rd DP 5 Perennial RPW B
Northing
35 1197 N
Total Points:
2
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
35
(right-click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
0
A. Geornorphology Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3 In- channel structure riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1 2
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9 Grade controls
0
05
1
1 5
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
1
1 5
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
18
a Man -made ditches are not rated see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13 Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
1 5
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
05
1
1 5
1
17 Sod -based Evidence of high water tables
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
10
C. Biology
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
0
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
1
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
0
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0 75, OBL= 1 5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
7
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See page 35 of NCDWQ manual
Notes
Adapted from NCDWQ Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Ongms
(version 4 11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date
1/17/14 Evaluator I NRN
E sting
80 6504 W
Project
Vickery/Stevens Mill Rd DP 6 Seasonal RPW F
Northing
35 1197 N
Total Points:
2
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30"
26
(right-click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
0
A. Geornorphology Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3 In- channel structure riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
0
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9 Grade controls
0
05
1
1 5
1
10 Natural valley
0
05 1
1 1
1 5
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0 I
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
125
a Man -made ditches are not rated see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13 Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
1
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
1
16 Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
05
1
1 5
1
17 Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
1 7
C. Biology
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
0
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
05
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
0
25 Algae
0
1 05
1 1
1 5
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0 75, OBL= 1 5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
65
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See page 35 of NCDWQ manual
Notes
Adapted from NCDWQ Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
On ins
(version 4 11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
[E]
Date
1/17/14 1 Evaluator I NRN
Easting
80 6504 W
Project
Vicke /Stevens Mill Rd DP 7 Seasonal RPW G
Northing
35 1197 N
Total Points:
2
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
20
(right-click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
0
A. Geornorphology Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
1
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3 In- channel structure riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9 Grade controls
0
05
1
1 5
05
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1 5
05
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
7
a Man -made ditches are not rated see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13 Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
1 5
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
05
1
1 5
0
17 Sod -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
7
C. Biology
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
0
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
0
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
0
25 Algae
0
05
1 1
1 5
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0 75, OBL= 1 5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
6
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See page 35 of NCDWQ manual
Notes
Adapted from NCDWQ Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Ongins
I (version 4 11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date
1/17/14 1 Evaluator I NRN
Eastm
80 6504 W
Pro ect
Vickery/Stevens Mill Rd DP 8 Seasonal RPW I
Northing
35 1197 N
Total Points:
2
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
21
(right-click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
0
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
11 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
1
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3 In- channel structure riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9 Grade controls
0
05
1
1 5
05
10 Natural valley
0
T 05
1
1 5
1
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
75
a Man -made ditches are not rated see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13 Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
1 5
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
1
16 Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
05
1
1 5
0
17 Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
1 75
C. Biology
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance d
0
1
2
3
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
0
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
0
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
0
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0 75, OBL= 1 5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
6
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See page 35 of NCDWQ manual
Notes
The stream is in the sewer line with rip -rap in the channel
Adapted from NCDWQ Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Ongms
(version 4 11)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
pi-c ectrSae Vickery - Stevens Mill Rd
CQy /fumy
Stallings /Union Co SangpFng Date 01117114
Appbcanyowner Bonterra Builders
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
State NC Sampling Pant DP2 UPL
tnvesuptor(sl LSR, NRN
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Section Townstnp Range
Landforrn (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) Terrace
_ OmMzed Rhtzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope (%) 0%
Suh -,egmn (ILRR or MLRA) MLRA 136
Lai
35 1197 N
Long 80 6504 W Datum WGS84
Soli map Urtut Naine TbC2 Tarrus gravelly silty
clay
loam
NWI classification
Are c&mrjc t hydi -dogx coed urns on the site typical for
this tine of year? Yes Y
No (if no, explain in Remarks )
Are Veg�atatwr,, N Soio N or Hydrology
N
sigruiEicariVy disturbed?
Are Normal Cacumstances' present? Yes X No
Are Vegetatwn N Soto N or Hydrology
N
naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach sate neap showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
1K
lydtsophlltic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
ttt7etlarirl Hyidrot'ogy Present? Yes No X
Rerna4 _' This wetland data form is also representative for vegetation, hydrology and soil found in UPL 4
HYDROLOGY
ti6"ettand Hydrol"y tndieators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reginred)
Pry MOzators (mmfrnran of one is reaiired, check a @ that apply)
_ Surface Soul Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High. Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Smiratim (A3)
_ OmMzed Rhtzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Tam Lutes (616)
_ Water Mori<s (811)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sedfrrsmt Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Dpi Deposits (63)
_ Tiro Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ AID Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ tma Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ V ter- Stawced Leaves (139)
_ Mrcrotopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Ora
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Presert? Yes No X
(includes cawbry (Mtge),
Descm`be Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Reim. -wks
US "Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Vetston 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree S7amm, (Plot size 30' ) % Cover Species? Status
1 liquidambar styraciflua 35 Y FAC
2Quercus alha 20 Y FACU
3 Cornus florida 15 N FACU
4 Oxydendrum arboreum 15 N UPL
5
6
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 42 5 20Rro of total cover 17
Sam (plot size 30' Y
I Quercus rubra
15
Y
FACU
2 Oxydendrum arboreum
15
Y
UPL
3 Liriodendron tulinifera
10
Y
FACU
a Cornus florlda
5
N
FACU
5
6
45 = Total Cover
50`ib a total cover 22 5 2o% of total cover 9
Shinn Stramxn (Plot size- 30' t
t
2
3
4
5
6
= Total Cover
Sampling Point DP2 UPL
Dominance Test worksheet
(dumber of Dornnant Species
That Are OBL FACW, or FAC 1 (A)
Total Number of Dormnam
Species Across AD Strata 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 125% (AtB)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of
MuWv by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50°/.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydiophyttc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sosfl and wetland hydrology nnist
be present uniess disturbed or problematic
50% of total cover 25 2001. of total cover 10
Herb Strafiirn� (Pkt size 30' Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
i Goodyera pubescens 5 Y FACU (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
2 Polystichum acrosticholdes 15
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>I t
Y FACU Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 10 20% of total cover 4
Woolly Virte Sttatlum (Pitt sae 30' )
1 Yltls Sp 10 Y NI
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover 5
rs here or on a separate!
10 = Total Cover
201X of total cover 2
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines regardless of size, and woody
plans except woody vises less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in heightt,
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Presenter Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mowtains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOL
Sampling Rant DP2 UPL
IPtafille ` 03eswbe to the depth needed to document the indrr aw or confirm the absence of vidrcators )
QDep hi ltr WN Redox Feaa aes
Fmchest Cdkar aropmu % Calker fnwist) % T LoF Temme IRernxriks
0-16 5YR 5/6 100 Silt loam
'Type-- C= AI '�k ndlfaft119B1L D=CtpkMvm RIW=Re&cad MaLJ 19l MS=Masked Sand Grains aL[mt7d7n Pf = lftfi2 ILmirm M=Mairm
IHVdi w Souk Pmrl5r aWs.
Indicators for Pdobtematic Hydric Soits':
_ Htrsrmsoll (Al)
_ Dark Sag (57)
_ 2 an Muck (A 110) (MLRA 147)
_ N3tsiic Epoeden M
_ PdWake Bekw &a1ace (58) WLRA 147.148)
_ Coasc'Praiine Redox (A16)
_ KMiz (A3
_ Thin Dank SeurBace (S9) OWLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Dili Snffivale (A ')
_ LcarW GOeyed Man= (F2)
_ Predmorst Floodplam Soils (F19)
_ Smkd [Layers )
_ Depkutd,Nmu (F3)
(NLRA 1X 147)
_ 2 cm @tU* (}` Iq (LRR N)
_ Redox Dank Std (F6)
_*fiery Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
DepOaedl Beli m Dat Suirkwe (AT 1)
_ Bepbted Dark Macro (F 71
_ O#ier (IExpk an m Renwks)
_ Tht* Dark Swfaw (AT21
_ RedDx rorls (F8)
_ SaftV Uudq fAl6mmail W) "M NIL
_ &vn s QT 12) (LRR AL
MaLRA 147.11418)
NILRA 1367
_ 5an v Gawed I&i om tlso
_ U mbic Sumiace (F13) CMLRA 136.122)
icrftaicrs of hydropI*ic a" and
_ S,amdty Radkaix (S5)
_ PWdmoM F irr Soils (F19) (MLRA 1481
viellaW hydrWcKjy must be presem
_ WON M
_ Red Parterutl Mall (F21) P&RA 127. 147)
tur&-ss disumbed or prot4erna .
Type
DEFOR (AXAC5)
Rv me drt
Hydra Soil mmser a9 Yes no x
US Arrt W Coups iml Eqq; a 'Eastem Moumains arid PkxkrKmg - Version 2,0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PrvgecuStte Vickery - Stevens Mill Rd Cay /Coumy Stallings /Union Co Sampling Date 01117114
Applrcant0wner Bonterra Builders State NC Sampling Point DP 1 Wtld C
investigato*) LSR, NRN Section, Township Range
Landforrm (tides, terrace, etc)- Floodplain Local rebel (concave, convex, none) Concave Slope (%) 0 - 3%
StAreTon (iLRR or ii1LRA) MLRA 136 Lai 35 1197 N Long 80 6504 W Datum WGS84
Sod Map Urn Narne_ SCA Secrest -Cid complex NWI classification
Axe cbmitic I hydrei Mc corm wris on the sine typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (if no, explain in Remarks )
Are vegetation N Solt N , or Hydrology N signiacanil fr disturbed? Are 'Normal Cfrcumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetatimn N Soil N or Hyskollogy N naturally proMermatic? (If needed, expiain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegeetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Citwtetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Reaiiarks This wetland data form is also representative for vegetation, hydrology and soil found in Wetland J
HYDROLOGY
WeWnd Hydrology indtoauws
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Prknary k4cators f minwm of one is recuired, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Hogh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X S.abiratron (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Tim Lines (B16)
X Water Marks (811)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sedniene Depot (132)
_ Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Baurows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Nkick Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Arad Mat or, Crust (134)
_ Oilier (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water Starred Leaves (84)
_ Microtopographic Relwf (D4)
_ Aq)uatrc Fauna (613)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Freld Observaitmus:
Stirfiace Water Present" Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X rot
Depth (rroches) 2-
Satniaaiion Present? Yes X No
Depth finches) 2-
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes cap&uy )
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, momormg well, aenal photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US AxmR,y Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point DP 1 Wtld C
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover, 25 20% of total cover 10
SatSirro (Pitt size 30' y
Z Fraxlnus pennslyvanlca 15 Y FACW
2 Platanus occldentalls 10 Y FACW
3
4
5
6
25 = Total Cover
50'x5 of total cover 12 5 m of total cover 5
Shunt Swami n (Pkar we 30' )
¶ Alnus serrulata 15 Y FACW
2
3
4
5
6
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 75 20% of total cover 3
Herb Strafu n (Pica size 30' )
1 Juncus effusus 25 Y FACW
2
3
4
S
6
7
6
9
10
1It
25 = Total Cover
501% of total cover 12 5 20 *A of tonal cover 5
Woody Vmoe StiatCumn (Pitt saze 30' )
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Remarks (Inc ode ptmto numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
6 (A)
6 (B)
100% (AlB)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
%o Cover
Sys) Status
Number of Dominant Species
2 Fraxlnus Pennslyvanica
35
Y FACW
That Are OBL FACW, or FAC
2 Platanus occldentalls
15
Y FACW
(A) (B)
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across AA Strata
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL FACW, or FAC
6
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover, 25 20% of total cover 10
SatSirro (Pitt size 30' y
Z Fraxlnus pennslyvanlca 15 Y FACW
2 Platanus occldentalls 10 Y FACW
3
4
5
6
25 = Total Cover
50'x5 of total cover 12 5 m of total cover 5
Shunt Swami n (Pkar we 30' )
¶ Alnus serrulata 15 Y FACW
2
3
4
5
6
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 75 20% of total cover 3
Herb Strafu n (Pica size 30' )
1 Juncus effusus 25 Y FACW
2
3
4
S
6
7
6
9
10
1It
25 = Total Cover
501% of total cover 12 5 20 *A of tonal cover 5
Woody Vmoe StiatCumn (Pitt saze 30' )
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Remarks (Inc ode ptmto numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
6 (A)
6 (B)
100% (AlB)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapes Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - DDonwiarce Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Pto#>lernattc Hydrophyttc Vegetation' (Explarn)
' Indicators of hydric soft and wetland hydrology rnust
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more an height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - AI9 herbaceous tnon- moody) plants, including
herbaceous vines regardless of size, and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody votes, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Armry Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

Sal3mptirtg pint DP 1 Wild C
PWORe Des=43fim GDsmbe to the depth needed to docurm st the indicator or confirin use absence of andreatorsj
DepOk MLIWX Redox Fe:atwes
(gichies1 C dkw (n= &G % 'Cdbr ("WOW % Tye L Tesuxe !merles
-0-2 10YR 3/2 85 10YR 6/1 15 C M SCt
2-12 10YR 6/1 95 2 5YR 4/8 5 C PL Clay loam
"TqPe-" C=Cuncavaam D= km ML
Hydric Sod OtWkati s:
_ H l Al)
_ BBaFAc Fdpi lam (A4
_ ENE& HrrAC dam)
H,*ka g mi Smdiafie- W)
Swanked Layers (AS)
2 cm Mbrsik ((,91% MRR W
Begakaedl flaw Sudave (Al 11
_ Smd1 MUd q fit grail (Sll) (LRR M,
IIA LRA 1417,1148)
— Saii4 r= )
Swidy Red= (SS)
SUVW WON
I /�. unr rn w r
tLocatjmx PL =more Luny. t -- Matrix.
Incticators for Probterrratic Hydnc SC
Dark SuMam (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (AlQ (MLRA 147)
_ PrdVrdke Bdw Surface (S8) (WEL RA 147, 148)
_ Coast IPtaii r Redox (A1, 6)
Thin Dasdk Stmfaisae (SS) (MLM 147,148)
(PMiLRA 147,148)
_ dLaaM Ueyed W1aou (F2)
_ IP ittorii F600dplaim Soils tF19)
(F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ Rix Dark Suttaxe (F6)
_ Very Shaqow Dark Surface (fF12)
Deplaed Dwt Stuface (F 73
_ Odief (Expfarus to Remarks)
Remksx (FO)
_
kwMwqNww Masses >F12) (LRR X
ULRA 136)
utrrhr6c Strrlam (F13) OALRA 136,122) indreaaws of Fiydra{drytrc vegetation and
Sodas (F19) CMLRA 148) wedaW hydro" anm be present,
_ Red ParM MasermW (F21) (M LRA 127, 147) lwtess drAurbed or probleinaw
Hydric Sod PreseW-1 Yes X No
US" C'orays odl EVjwers Faswm Mourgair s and Px3dnww - Vusion 2,0

WETLAND DETERMWATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pta>,ecUStte Vickery - Stevens Mill Rd ClyiCourrty Stallings /Union Co Samphrig Date 01117114
Appixaritiowner Bonterra Builders State NC Sampling Point DP 3 Wtld H
lnvestigator(s)� LSR, NRN Section, Tovmstup Range
Landfam (hililstope, terrace, etc y_ Floodplain Local relief (concave convex, none) Concave
Sub,vgmn(1RRor MLRA) MLRA 136 Lai 35 1197 N Long 80 6504 W
Sodl Map Urs Naine ScA Secrest -Cid complex NWI classut►cation
Are cfmnatie / hy&dcgx corrftws on the site typecat for thus ttme of year? Yes Y No (If no explain in Remarks )
Slope (%) 0 - 3%
Datum WGS84
Are Vey ann N 'Sal N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are 'Norma9 Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetatrvn N , Sao N or Hydrobgy N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytrc Vegetatwn Present- Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydtmc Sod Present? Yes X No within a FNettand? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrofo+gy Present'? Yes X No
Remarks This wetland data form is also representative for vegetation, hydrology and sod found in Wetland E
HYDROLOGY
Wettand Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (mmnrrrmirri of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (156)
X Surface Water (Al)
_ Trite Aquatic Plants (B74)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Suffide Odor (C1)
X Drainage Patterns (610)
X S ruratron (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Tam Lines (1336)
X Water Mtarts (1511)
_ Presence of Reduced tron (C4)
_ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ SedirrtemE Deposas (152)
_ Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Dr3t Deports (133)
_ Thm Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
AJOial Mat or Crust (154)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Piartis (Dl)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Vmtfe an Aerial I'ntagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water-Stazwd, (Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquaac Faunas (1313)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Fief Obsecvaumtrs:
Surface Crater Present'? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 3
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches)
Saaur bon Present? Yes X No
Depth finches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capNary f )
Descnbe Recorded) Data (stream gauge, rnorvoring well, aenal photos, previous inspections), d available
ReMeAs
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point DP 3 Wild H
100 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet
50`.10 of total cover 50 20% of total cover 20 Total % Cover of Multrniy by
Saplm Stra (Plat size 30' y
I Fraxmus pennslyvanica 30
2 Platanus occldentalls 25
3 Sahx nigra 10
4
5
6
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratton (Plot size 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Number of Dorranant Species
Ti Fraxmus pennslyvanica
45 Y
FACW
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 7 (A)
Z Platanus occldentalls
35 Y
FACW
FACU species
x 4 =
Total Number of Dominant
3 Salix nipra
20 Y
OBL
Species Across All Strata 8 (B)
d
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Parterre of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 875% (A/B)
6
100 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet
50`.10 of total cover 50 20% of total cover 20 Total % Cover of Multrniy by
Saplm Stra (Plat size 30' y
I Fraxmus pennslyvanica 30
2 Platanus occldentalls 25
3 Sahx nigra 10
4
5
6
65 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 32 5 2096 of total cover 13
Shmub Stratum (P1bt size 30' )
Cornus amomum 25 Y FACW
2
3
4
5
6
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytc Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50°%o
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytnc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
25 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetatton Strata
50% of, iota! cover 125 20% of total cover 5
erb SStratum PCot size 30' Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
H
( ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
I Lobelia cardinalis 10 Y FACW (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
2 Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3 approximately 20 It (6 m) of move in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
4
OBL species
x 1 =
6
FACW species
x 2 =
Y FACW
10
III
FAC species
x 3 =
Y FACW
FACU species
x 4 =
N OBL
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
65 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 32 5 2096 of total cover 13
Shmub Stratum (P1bt size 30' )
Cornus amomum 25 Y FACW
2
3
4
5
6
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytc Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50°%o
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytnc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
25 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetatton Strata
50% of, iota! cover 125 20% of total cover 5
erb SStratum PCot size 30' Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
H
( ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
I Lobelia cardinalis 10 Y FACW (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
2 Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3 approximately 20 It (6 m) of move in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
4
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in heigh
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plans, including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately 3
it 0 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
5
6
7
s
9
10
III
10 = Total Cover
501% of total cover 5 2o% of total cover 2
Wbodiy Vine Stratm m (Plbt size 30' )
1
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Preservt'7 Yes X No
Remarks (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Atnrur.y Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
SampGrlg polni DP 3 Wtld H
Phofille nptimw U)esanbe to the aiepVt needed to document the atdrea "ar con-firm the absence of mddreators)
Depth dfet CK E our Feakses
(WwhelQ Cdkur {(uuanursDll % t dm w (MOU54 % TWM L Texh" Ren'irks
-0-2 10YR 3/2 85 10YR 6/1 15 C PL SCL
2-12 10YR 6/1 100 - Clay loam
H*, Mar Sam I nde mas
_ lliur e Eppedbn
IMIMA Pis 4"
Him SauiFialfe M43
_ Skrratox d Layer (5)
_ 2 an WWdk (AIC) (LRR N)
_ OVIeted Odim Oak Saurf (Al l)
_ Thxik Diealk Sudare 9A14
—
Swdf Ubdo Mmaral (S7) (LRR Ni.
IELPA 147,1141f)
_ Savw# rz (SQ
_ SCI WON ((56)
Law (A ubserwreQ-
Tvive
K, R-w ,
loca= PL=Pme Lining M=V.Uru c
hubcators for Problematic Hydnc Sc
_
Dart Sumt W5
_ 2 cm. Nick (A1O) th%PA 147)
_ Pd WAX Betmo Suurfam (Sx) OUL RA 147. 148)
_ Cears7 'Price Redlox (A16)
_ Thin QTaff k Sam& (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
toamy U d Wow (F2)
_ Pwdmcurut Fkwopb in Souls )F13)
�i Depk5Wd W30a (F3)
(MLRA 1365, 147)
_ Redox Dark Swfwe (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark SWam (TF12)
DqpOoted Dark Surface (F 7)
_ fir (Expkarn in Renurks)
lrx iFO)
_ lkiou UnWinew Masses tIF12) (LRR FL
MIRA lax)
t;opd rim Sarataw (F33) (6i'ILRA 136,122) choir wus of hydrophytic vegetatm and
_ i ut Fl ran Souks (F 19) (MLRA 148) Qt edand hydrology must be present,
_
Red Parearl Nkoffud (F21) (OKRA 127. 147) lurAess drAffbed or probtu
Hydric Sod PreserCt-I Yes X no
US Amy Caps d Enoneers Eastern Mmrklaucs and Pkdmorrt - Vasan 2 0

J
J
CL
L_
a
c
v
c
vi
v
b
6
O
J
a
v
c
_5
d
C
O
c
O
C
w
C
A
N
c
b
-N-
U) N
LOr-v0N
Q _0
U), O m
O
I
M O O D O
I CU
O T
0
E
Z a�
n v
E
0 0 0 0 0
U)
W T
J
J
CL
L_
a
c
v
c
vi
v
b
6
O
J
a
v
c
_5
d
C
O
c
O
C
w
C
A
N
c
b
-N-
N
Z
LOr-v0N
O
I
M O O D O
a
0
n v
0 0 0 0 0
W T
Z
N T
W
T T
LLI
O LO co LO O
Ln
LA
Q
J
LO I-- CD LO CD
T
T
O
Ln
N
N
Q
w
T
}
co
Q
m U—
(9
Z
Z Z,
W
Q
L6 LO c0 c6 LO
Z
a
fn
a
w
x w
-a
Q
Q
E c c c -C
0 N N
c0
w
LL
O a
•�
Z
J
N
m m«
C
U
Z
Zm
at6i af6i
LLcncncna
u
y
a
w
O
M
LU
a
a J
Q
U_
O_ O O OO O
H
N
a.
D
N N N N
0
:3
3 7 7 7 7
o
O
O
O O
w
7
H
H
F-
Q
X
Ln
Cl) r Cl) Lf) m
M
01
�I
� N CO V h
fl
n
Q
O O M O W)
O
N
a
d
0 0 0 0 0
T
Q_
LL
_
N
O-
0) r-- (DD
0) N LD co n
Off
Cn
N N co N
M
tp
N
0
N
Z
L
�-
w
U w ?�
a a o
O
3
c
n. Q
to
J
Lo L6 L9 N O
J C
Z
v
LL
U_
H LU
0 0 a
o
Ln Ln rn Ln eo
Ln
f.
r
o
D
O
J
J
CL
L_
a
c
v
c
vi
v
b
6
O
J
a
v
c
_5
d
C
O
c
O
C
w
C
A
N
c
b
-N-

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE, FiLE NAME, AND NUMBER
Applicant Bonterra Builders
Site Stevens Mill Road/Vickery Subdivision
Form for Jurisdictional Pond A, Juriscictiomal Perennial RPW B, Jurisdictional Wetland C, Jurisdictional Wetland E,
Jurisdictional Seasonal RPW F, Jurisdictional Seasonal RPW G, Jurisdictional Wetland H, Jurisdictional Seasonal RPW I,
Jurisdictional Wetland J, and Jurisdictional Seasonal RPW K3
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
State NC County/parish/borough Union City Stallings
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 1197° N, Long -80 6504° LWJ
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Crooked Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) into which the aquatic resource flows Crooked Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040105 Rocky
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential Jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites (e g , offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date
® Field Determination Date(s) 11 -6 -2014
SECTION 11 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There AXre o "navigahle waters of the US ' within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are "waters of the US within Clean Water Act (CWA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) i
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non - wetland waters 2471 5 linear feet 7 width (ft) and/or 0 40 acres
Wetlands 0 522 acres
c Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on Established by OHWM
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section Ill below
Z For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e g, typically 3 months)

Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) '
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only, if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D 1 , otherwise, see Section III B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent"
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapauos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i e tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g, typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary, Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size 1430square r s
Drainage area 140 acres- -
Average annual rainfall 44 inches
Average annual snowfall 0 inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are 20 -25 rimer miles from TNW
Project waters are I (or less) river miles from RPW
Project waters are 10 -15 a` erial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are I (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW' On -site jurisdictional features flow into an unnamed tributary of North Fork Crooked
Creek, to North Fork Crooked Creek, to Crooked Creek, then to Rocky River (TNW)
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West
' Flow route can be described by identifying, e g , tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW

Tributary stream order, if known i
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tributary is ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man -made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man- altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width 7 feet
Average depth +/ -4 feet
Average side slopes 2-1
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
® Silts ® Sands
® Cobbles ® Gravel
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type /% cover
❑ Other Explain
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e g , highly eroding, sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes Explain
Tributary geometry Belatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for Seasonal ow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year 6-10
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Discrete and confined Characteristics
Subsurface flow Un n wo Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
® Bed and banks
® OHWM' (check all indicators that apply)
® clear natural line impressed on the bank
❑
® changes in the character of soil
❑
® shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
❑ sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM' Explain
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of C WA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum,
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings,
❑ physical markings /characteristics ❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(in) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize tributary (e g , water color is clear, discolored, oily film, water quality, general watershed characteristics, etc )
Explain water color is clear - no signs of pollutants
identify specific pollutants, if known
'A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g , where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e g, flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
® Riparian corridor Characteristics (type, average width) 25 -50
® Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size 0 522 acres
Wetland type Explain Forested riparian corridors and maintained/disturbed utnty ROWs
Wetland quality Explain Fair
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW
Flow is Intermittent flow', Explain Wetlands located adjacent to perennial and up and downslope of intermittent
channels having flows resulting from precipitation events
Surface flow is Overland sheetflow
Characteristics
Subsurface flow Unk�'n wnowno Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW
® Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain Non - abutting wetlands connected through observable overland
flow and ephemeral conveyances
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/barrier Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 20 -25 river miles from TNW
Project waters are 40 -15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from Wetland to navigable waters
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 400 - 05 0 500-year, floodplam
(n) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g, water color is clear, brown oil film on surface, water quality, general watershed
characteristics etc ) Explain water color is clear - no signs of pollutants
Identify specific pollutants, if known
(m) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
® Riparian buffer Characteristics (type, average width) ,
® Vegetation type /percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish /spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings typical wetland species - amphibians, etc
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis 4
Approximately ( 0 522 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland, specify the following
Directly abuts" (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Jurisdictional Wetland C 007 N
Jurisdictional Wetland E 005 N
Jurisdictional Wetland H 038 Y
Jurisdictional Wetland J 002 Y
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed Onsite wetlands and Jurisdictional
RPW's provide habitat for herpetofauna and macro invertebrates These wetlands have the capacity to provide nutrients and organic
carbon to downstream food webs Wetlands provide flood storage during rain events and ground water recharge during dry periods
The wetlands also trap and filter pollutants before reaching Perennial RPWs on site and the Rocky River (TNW)
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include, for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (it any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs'
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW"
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section 111 D
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III D Wetland C is 0 07 acres in size and is adjacent but not abutting a perennial RPW located along the property
boundary (Perennial RPW B) There is upland area separating the wetland from the adjacent RPW but surrounding characteristics
such as wrack lines and drainage patterns indicate that water from Wetland C flows downslope to the perennial RPW Wetland Cis
considered Jurisdictional due to its significant nexus to the downstream TNW through the perennial RPW Wetland E is 0 05 acres
in size and is adjacent but not abutting a seasonal RPW located in the southern portion of the site (Seasonal RPW K3) There is
several hundred feet of high ground before the confluence with the Seasonal RPW however, there are indicators present such as
swales /ephemeral conveyance channels that indicate water from Wetland E flows downslope to the seasonal RPW Wetland E is
considered Jurisdictional due to its significant nexus to the downstream TNW through the seasonal /perennial RPWs and wetland
complex Pollutants can be transported from these wetlands to the TNW by the identified routes Additionally, these wetlands have
the capacity to reduce pollutants through vegetation filtering, reduce flooding by providing storage, provide recharge to adjacent
RPW during dry climate conditions, transfer nutrients and organic carbon to downstream food webs, and provide habitat for
amphibians and other wildlife

D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
❑ TNWs linear feet width (ft), Or, acres
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TN Ws acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial Perennial RPW B shows typical morphology and flow of perennial streams for this region and the
determination is supported by the accompanying Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e g , typically three months each year) are
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally' (e g, typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally Seasonal RPWs F, G, I, and K3 exhibit geomorphology, hydrology, and biological indicators consistent with
seasonal flowing streams in the piedmont ecoregion as documented by the attached NCDWQ Stream Identification
Assessment Forms
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
® Tributary waters 2471 linear feet 7 width (ft)
® Other non - wetland waters 0 73 acres
Identify type(s) of waters Pond A located on the southern portion of the site is abutted by Jurisdictional Wetland
J
3 Non -RPWs' that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non - wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year -round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetland J is all directly abutting perennial RPW B with no break in jurisdiction
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow 'seasonally " Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section iii D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW Wetland H is all directly abutting seasonal RPW I with no break in. jurisdiction
Provide acreage estimates for, jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 40 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are _jurisidwtional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 12acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for, jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
'See Footnote # 3

7 Impoundments of Jurisdictional waters v
As a general rule the impoundment of a Jurisdictional tributary remains Jurisdictional
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U S ," or
® Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 10
❑ which are or could be used by Interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries In Interstate commerce
❑ Interstate isolated waters Explain
❑ Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non - wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
F NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area Included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC,' the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule' (MBR)
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for Jurisdiction Explain
❑ Other (explain, if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non - Jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i e , presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for Irrigated agriculture), using best professional
Judgment (check all that apply)
❑ Non - wetland waters (i e , rivers, streams) linear feet width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for Jurisdiction (check all that apply)
❑ Non - wetland waters (i e , rivers, streams) linear feet, width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included In case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps, plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
v To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA Jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps /EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Junsdiction Following Rapanos

of
6/
■
■
■
/1
Data sheets prepared by the Corps
Corps navigable waters' study
U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
State /Local wetland inventory map(s)
FEMA/FIRM maps
100 -year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
Apph cab le/supporting case law
Applicable /supporting scientific literature
Other information (please specify)
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD