Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix IV Monitoring Appendix IV DWQ Water Quality Monitoring Programs in the Roanoke River Basin Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs 219 220 Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs DWQ Water Quality Monitoring Programs in the Roanoke River Basin Staff in the Environmental Sciences Branch (ESB) and Regional Offices of DWQ collect a variety of biological, chemical and physical data. The following discussion contains a brief introduction to each program, followed by a summary of water quality data in Roanoke River basin for that program. For more detailed information on sampling and assessment of streams in this basin, refer to the Basinwide Assessment Report for the Roanoke River basin, available from the Environmental Sciences Branch website at http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us/bar.html or by calling (919) 733-9960. Roanoke River Basin include: • Benthic Macroinvertebrates • Fish Assessments • Aquatic Toxicity Monitoring • Lake Assessment • Ambient Monitoring System Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Benthic macroinvertebrates, or benthos, are organisms that live in and on the bottom substrates of rivers and streams. These organisms are primarily aquatic insect larvae. The use of benthos data has proven to be a reliable monitoring tool, as benthic macroinvertebrates are sensitive to subtle changes in water quality. Since macroinvertebrates have life cycles of six months to over one year, the effects of short-term pollution (such as a spill) will generally not be overcome until the following generation appears. The benthic community also integrates the effects of a wide array of potential pollutant mixtures. Criteria have been developed to assign a bioclassification to each benthic sample based on the number of different species present in the pollution intolerant groups of Ephemeroptera (Mayflies), Plecoptera (Stoneflies) and Trichoptera (Caddisflies), commonly referred to as EPTs. A Biotic Index (BI) value gives an indication of overall community pollution tolerance. Different benthic macroinvertebrate criteria have been developed for different ecoregions (mountains, piedmont, coastal plain and swamp) within North Carolina and bioclassifications fall into five categories (except for swam streams): Excellent, Good, Good-Fair, Fair and Poor. The Biological Assessment Unit defines “swamp streams” as those streams that are within the coastal plain ecoregion and that normally have no visible flow during a part of the year. This low flow period usually occurs during the summer, but flowing water should be present in swamp streams during the winter. Sampling during winter, high flow periods provides the best opportunity for detecting differences in communities from what is natural, and only winter (February to early March) benthos data can be used when evaluating swamp streams. The swamp stream must have visible flow in this winter period, with flow comparable to a coastal plain stream that would have acceptable flow for sampling in summer. Swamp stream bioclassifications fall into three categories: Natural, Moderate and Severe. Overview of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Data Based on benthic macroinvertebrate data, water quality in the Roanoke River basin is Good near the headwaters (subbasins 01-04), while in the lower reaches (subbasins 05-10) overall water quality is generally Good-Fair. Benthic macroinvertebrate basinwide samples resulted in the following bioclassifications: Excellent-1, Good-9, Good-Fair-6, Fair-3, Natural-11, and Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs 221 Moderate-6. Comparisons of benthos data from 1999 to 2004 between repeat sites reveal that Dan River at NC 704 improved from Good to Excellent, North Double Creek and Country Line Creek improved from Good-Fair to Good, Marlowes Creek improved from Fair to Good-Fair, while two swamp sites (Hoggard Mill and Conoconnara Swamp) declined from Natural to Moderate. All remaining sites maintained the same bioclassification from 1999 to 2004. Overall, water quality in this basin has improved slightly since 1999, based on benthos data. The following table lists the bioclassifications (by subbasin) for all benthos sites in the Roanoke River basin. Benthos sampling may slightly overestimate the proportion of Fair, Poor and Severe stress sites, as DWQ special studies often have the greatest sampling intensity (number of sites/stream) in areas where it is believed that water quality problems exist. Benthic macroinvertebrate basinwide monitoring data collected in the Roanoke River basin, 1999-2004. Current basin sites are in bold. Subbasin/ Waterbody Location County Index No. Date ST EPT BI EPT BI BioClass 30201 Dan R NC 704 Stokes 22-(1) 7/7/04 91 45 3.89 3.42 Excellent Stokes 22-(1) 8/23/99 85 41 4.20 3.31 Good Stokes 22-(1) 8/16/99 74 32 4.16 3.19 Good Dan R SR 1695 Stokes 22-(8) 7/7/04 87 43 4.80 4.07 Good Stokes 22-(8) 8/23/99 72 37 4.58 3.96 Good N Double Cr SR 1504 Stokes 22-10 6/28/04 31 31 -- 3.42 Good Stokes 22-10 8/23/99 25 25 -- 3.95 Good-Fair Snow Cr SR 1673 Stokes 22-20 7/7/04 31 31 -- 4.33 Good Stokes 22-20 9/13/00 29 29 -- 4.10 Good Stokes 22-20 8/23/99 18 18 -- 4.37 Fair Town Fork Cr SR 1998 Stokes 22-25 5/18/04 87 35 4.84 3.86 Good-Fair Town Fork Cr SR 1961 Stokes 22-25 5/25/04 67 26 5.10 4.69 Good-Fair Town Fork Cr SR 1917 Stokes 22-25 5/25/04 80 35 5.30 4.84 Good Brushy Fk SR 1998 Stokes 22-25-1 5/18/04 86 37 5.10 4.06 Good-Fair 30202 Mayo R SR 1358 Rockingham 22-30-(1) 7/8/04 77 33 4.71 4.13 Good Rockingham 22-30-(1) 8/23/99 70 32 4.26 3.44 Good Mayo R SR 2177 Rockingham 22-30-(10) 8/24/99 52 21 5.23 4.26 Good-Fair 30203 Rock House Cr SR 2127 Rockingham 22-34-(2) 4/12/01 81 23 5.00 3.80 Good-Fair Smith R NC 14 Rockingham 22-40-(3) 9/13/99 51 18 5.24 3.68 Fair 30204 Dan R NC 57 Caswell 22-(39) 8/24/99 66 32 5.42 4.52 Good Country Line Cr SR 1129 Caswell 22-56-(1) 7/1/04 24 24 -- 4.89 Good Country Line Cr NC 57 Caswell 22-56-(3.7) 7/1/04 24 24 -- 4.82 Good 30205 Marlowes Cr SR 1351 Person 22-58-12-6 6/30/04 66 14 6.67 5.87 Fair Marlowes Cr SR 1322 Person 22-58-12-6 6/30/04 56 13 6.43 5.93 Good-Fair Person 22-58-12-6 8/25/99 53 9 6.34 5.74 Fair 30206 Grassy Cr SR 1436 Granville 23-2-(1) 6/30/04 13 13 -- 5.05 Not Rated Mountain Cr SR 1300 Granville 23-2-3 7/2/04 13 13 -- 5.40 Not Rated Island Cr SR 1445 Granville 23-4 6/29/04 17 17 -- 5.48 Good-Fair Granville 23-4 8/24/94 17 17 -- 5.11 Good-Fair Nutbush Cr NC 39 Vance 23-8-(1) 6/29/04 70 12 7.34 6.84 Fair Nutbush SR 1317 Vance 23-8-(1) 6/29/04 63 9 7.00 6.70 Fair Vance 23-8-(1) 8/25/99 41 8 6.73 6.76 Fair 30207 Smith Cr SR 1217 Warren 23-10 4/26/04 69 18 6.29 5.09 Fair Smith Cr SR 1208 Warren 23-10 4/26/04 87 22 6.03 4.87 Good-Fair Smith Cr US 1 Warren 23-10 4/26/04 50 10 6.43 5.13 Fair Smith Cr US 1 Warren 23-10 7/16/99 59 12 6.56 5.52 Fair Newmans Cr SR 1218 Warren 23-10-2 4/27/04 76 15 6.30 5.32 Fair Sixpound Cr SR 1306 Warren 23-13 6/29/04 62 15 6.43 5.44 Good-Fair Warren 23-13 7/16/99 54 14 5.50 5.05 Good-Fair 222 Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs Subbasin/ Waterbody Location County Index No. Date ST EPT BI EPT BI BioClass 30208 Deep Cr US 158 Halifax 23-24(1) 2/23/04 62 23 5.28 4.10 Natural 7/15/99 58 11 6.41 5.17 Not Rated Chockoyotte Cr Country Club Rd Halifax 23-29 2/23/04 52 11 6.72 5.40 Moderate Quankey Cr NC 903 Halifax 23-30 2/23/04 53 17 5.82 4.05 Natural 2/16/99 40 9 6.66 5.93 Natural Quankey Cr NC 561 Halifax 23-30 9/1/99 9 5.51 Fair L Quankey Cr NC 903 Halifax 23-30-1 2/23/04 46 17 5.65 4.49 Moderate Oconeechee Cr SR 1126 Northhampto n 23-31 2/16/99 22 4 6.48 6.88 Natural Conoconnara Swp NC 561 Halifax 23-33 2/24/04 30 3 7.22 7.26 Moderate 2/16/99 31 5 6.45 6.81 Natural Kehukee Swp SR 1804 Halifax 23-42 2/24/04 46 7 7.03 5.89 Moderate 9/2/99 6 6 6.19 6.19 Not Rated 2/11/99 59 8 7.11 6.64 Moderate 30209 Conoho Cr NC 11/42 Martin 23-49 2/4/04 31 4 7.64 7.10 Moderate Conoho Cr NC 125/903 Martin 23-49 2/1/99 29 3 7.29 7.58 Conoho Cr SR 1417 Martin 23-49 2/4/04 38 6 6.68 5.40 Natural 2/1/99 39 5 6.27 4.80 Hardison Mill Cr SR 1528 Martin 23-50-3 2/4/04 36 2 7.49 5.20 Moderate 2/1/99 27 3 7.29 7.67 Moderate 30210 Cashie R SR 1219, be WWTP Bertie 24-2-(1) 2/23/04 29 3 7.47 7.03 Moderate Bertie 24-2-(1) 2/11/99 41 6 7.51 7.24 Natural Cashie R SR 1257 Bertie 24-2-(1) 2/24/04 35 7 6.51 4.90 Natural SR 1257 Bertie 24-2-(1) 2/15/99 34 7 6.80 6.09 Natural Hoggard Mill Cr SR 1301 Bertie 24-2-6 2/23/04 30 3 7.13 5.65 Moderate Bertie 24-2-6 2/15/99 46 7 6.81 6.38 Natural Roquist Swp US 13/17 Bertie 24-2-8 2/24/04 38 4 7.01 6.46 Natural US 13/17 Bertie 24-2-8 2/11/99 31 4 6.99 5.50 Natural Wading Place Cr NC 308 Bertie 24-2-8 3/8/99 35 3 7.31 7.45 Moderate Assessing Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities in Small Streams The benthic macroinvertebrate community of small streams is naturally less diverse than the streams used to develop the current criteria for flowing freshwater streams. The benthic macroinvertebrate database is being evaluated and a study to systematically look at small reference streams in different ecoregions is being developed with the goal of finding a way to evaluate water quality conditions in such small streams. DWQ will use this monitoring information to identify potential impacts to these waters even though a use support rating is not assigned. DWQ will continue to develop criteria to assess water quality in small streams. Fish Assessments Historical studies of fish communities in the Roanoke River basin were conducted primarily by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) in the 1960s and late 1970s. Several streams were sampled by DWQ during the last basinwide planning cycle (1994). Twenty-three of the 30 sites sampled in 2004 had not been sampled previously. Scores are assigned to these samples using the North Carolina Index of Biotic Integrity (NCIBI). The NCIBI uses a cumulative assessment of twelve parameters or metrics. Each metric is designed to contribute unique information to the overall assessment. The scores for all metrics are then summed to obtain the overall NCIBI score. Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs 223 Overview of Fish Community Data In 2004, fish community assessments were performed at 30 sites in the basin, 29 in the Piedmont and 1 in the Coastal Plain. Chockoyotte Creek was not rated because metrics and criteria have yet to be developed for Coastal Plain streams. The Piedmont NCIBI ratings ranged from Poor to Excellent with the scores ranging from 22 to 54. The two streams rated Excellent were Archies and Peters Creeks. Based upon the fish community ratings, degraded streams (bioclassifications of Fair or Poor) included North Hyco, Little Island, Nutbush, and Smith Creeks. Fish community sampling resulted in the following bioclassifications: Excellent-2, Good-18, Good- Fair-5, Fair-2, and Poor-2. The following table lists the most recent ratings since 1990, by subbasin, for all fish community sites. Fish community data collected from the Roanoke River basin, 1990 - 2004. Current basinwide sites are in bold font. Subbasin/Waterbody Location County Index No. Date NCIBI Score NCIBI Rating 030201 Dan R SR 1416 Stokes 22-(1) 04/19/04 52 Good Archies Cr SR 1415 Stokes 22-2 04/19/04 54 Excellent Elk Cr SR 1433 Stokes 22-5 04/20/04 44 Good-Fair Peters Cr SR 1497 Stokes 22-6 04/21/04 54 Excellent Big Cr SR 1471 Stokes 22-9 04/20/04 48 Good N Double Cr SR 1504 Stokes 22-10 04/20/04 42 Good-Fair S Double Cr SR 1483 Stokes 22-11 04/20/04 46 Good Snow Cr SR 1652 Stokes 22-20 04/21/04 46 Good Town Fork Cr SR 1955 Stokes 22-25 04/21/04 48 Good 030202 Big Beaver Island Cr US 311 Rockingham 22-29 04/22/04 52 Good Pawpaw Cr SR 1360 Rockingham 22-30-6-(1) 04/22/04 44 Good-Fair 08/03/90 48 Good Hogans Cr NC 704 Rockingham 22-31 04/22/04 48 Good Jacobs Cr NC 704 Rockingham 22-32-(0.5) 04/22/04 50 Good 030203 Rock House Cr SR 2127 Rockingham 22-34-(2) 04/23/04 48 Good Matrimony Cr NC 770 Rockingham 22-38 04/23/04 52 Good Wolf Island Cr SR 1767 Rockingham 22-48 04/23/04 50 Good Wolf Island Cr NC 700 Caswell 22-48 10/05/94 54 Excellent Hogans Cr SR 1330 Caswell 22-50 05/25/04 52 Good Jones Cr SR 2571 Rockingham 22-50-3 06/08/04 48 Good 030204 Moon Cr SR 1511 Caswell 22-51 04/30/04 46 Good 09/07/94 44 Good-Fair Rattlesnake Cr SR 1523 Caswell 22-52 05/25/04 48 Good Cane Cr SR 1527 Caswell 22-54 05/25/04 46 Good 10/05/94 46 Good Country Line Cr NC 57 Caswell 22-56-(3.7) 09/07/94 48 Good 030205 N Hyco Cr US 158 Caswell 22-58-1 04/30/04 30 Poor S Hyco Cr US 158 Person 22-58-4-(3) 04/30/04 52 Good Marlowe Cr SR 1322 Person 22-58-12-9 04/28/04 42 Good-Fair 09/07/94 40 Good-Fair 030206 Aarons Cr SR 1400 Granville 22-59 04/28/04 46 Good Grassy Cr SR 1300 Granville 23-2-(1) 06/09/99 46 Good Grassy Cr SR 1436 Granville 23-2-(1) 06/02/94 50 Good Johnson Cr SR 1440 Granville 23-2-7-(1) 04/28/04 44 Good-Fair Island Cr SR 1445 Granville 23-4 06/09/99 54 Excellent 06/02/94 50 Good Little Island Cr SR 1348 Vance 23-4-3 04/29/04 30 Poor 224 Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs Subbasin/Waterbody Location County Index No. Date NCIBI Score NCIBI Rating Nutbush Cr SR 1317 Vance 23-8-(1) 04/29/04 38 Fair 10/04/94 44 Good-Fair 030207 Smith Cr US 1 Warren 23-10 04/29/04 38 Fair 05/12/94 42 Good-Fair Sixpound Cr SR 1306 Warren 23-13 05/12/94 42 Good-Fair 030208 Deep Cr US 158 Halifax 23-24-(1) 05/26/04 46 Good 09/21/94 50 Good Chockoyotte Cr US 158 Halifax 23-29 05/26/04 --- Not Rated Quankey Cr SR 1619 Halifax 23-30 09/21/94 38 Fair Conoconnara Swp NC 561 Halifax 23-33 09/21/94 --- Not Rated Kehukee Swp SR 1804 Halifax 23-42 10/27/94 --- Not Rated 030210 Cashie R SR 1257 Bertie 24-2-(1) 10/26/94 --- Not Rated In 2004, 61 different species were collected during NC DWQ's fish community monitoring program. The most commonly collected species were the bluehead chub and the redbreast sunfish (collected at 28 of the 30 sites). The most abundant species was the bluehead chub, which constituted almost one-quarter of all the fish collected. It was also the numerically dominant species at 15 of the 30 sites. Overview of Fish Tissue Sampling The Division conducted fish tissue surveys at four stations within the Roanoke Basin from 1999 to 2004. These surveys were conducted as part of the mercury contaminant assessments in the eastern part of the state and during statewide pesticide and PCB assessments. Tissue samples collected during the period contained PCB and organic contaminants at undetectable levels or at levels less than the US EPA, US FDA, and State of North Carolina criteria. Elevated mercury concentrations were, however, measured in fish samples collected from the Cashie River near Windsor (Subbasin 03-02-10). Elevated levels were most often detected in largemouth bass, a species at the top of the food chain and most often associated with mercury bioaccumulation in North Carolina. Largemouth bass, yellow perch and redear sunfish (10 of 23 samples) collected from the Cashie River contained mercury concentrations exceeding the state criteria of 0.4 ppm. Presently, there are no site-specific consumption advisories for mercury contaminated fish in the Roanoke River basin; however, an advice for the consumption of shark, Swordfish, Tilefish, King mackerel, Spanish mackerel, Albacore tuna, Largemouth bass, Bowfin/Blackfish, and Chain pickerel/Jack fish east of Interstate 85 was issued by NCDHHS in 2002. For more information on NCDHHS consumption advice and advisories in North Carolina, refer to http://www.epi.state.nc.us/epi/fish/current.html. There is a NCDHHS site specific fish consumption advisory due to dioxin contamination in the Roanoke River from Williamston to the mouth including Welch Creek and the western part of Albemarle Sound (Chapter 8). Dioxin concentrations, however, have been declining since 1994. Annual monitoring by the mill has indicated that dioxin concentrations in most fish species are gradually decreasing since the mill initiated dioxin reduction and management programs in the early 1990s. In October 2001 NCDHHS lifted gamefish from the advisory after consecutive Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs 225 sampling years showed dioxin levels in gamefish dropped below the NC criteria of 4 pg/g. The advisory remains in place for catfish and carp species. Roanoke River Basin Fish Kills DWQ has systematically tracked reported fish kill events across the state since 1996. From September 1,1999 to August 31,2004, DWQ field investigators reported 3 fish kill events in the Roanoke River basin. The two largest fish kills in this basin occurred after hurricane Isabel in 2003. The fish kills occurred due to low dissolved oxygen levels in the river as a result from an influx of low DO swamp water and organic matter flowing into the mainstem of the river following the hurricane. The following table lists the details of the Roanoke River Basin fish kills. For more information on fish kills in North Carolina, refer to http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us/Fishkill/fishkillmain.htm Detailed Fish Kill Information for the Roanoke River Basin from September 1, 1999-August 31, 2004. Date County Waterbody Location Kill # Kill Area Duration Cause Mortality Fish species Comments Subbasin 03-02-09 9/23/03 Martin Roanoke River Jamesesville, Plymouth WA03021 18 miles 2 days Low DO 93,500 Juvenile fish are not reflected in totals. Catfish, Sunfish, Suckers, Shad, Largemouth bass, Eels, Minnows, Flounder, Perch, Striped bass Kill resulted from the flushing of swamp water into the river following Hurricane Isabel, and the subsequent drop in DO levels. Kill zone stretched from Devils Gut above Jamesville to the river mouth. All DO readings were < 0.5 mg/L. Fish were seen at the surface gasping for air. Subbasin 03-02-10 9/25/03 Bertie Cashie River Windsor WA03022 17.7 miles 4 days Low DO 22,243 Sunfish, Catfish, Crappie, Minnows Kill caused by low DO levels resulting from an influx of swamp water and organic matter following Hurricane Isabel. Dead fish found from Windsor to the mouth of the river. All DO readings were < 0.5 mg/L. Subbasin 03-02-05 3/29/04 Person Mayo Creek Below Reservoir Spillway RA04001 1 mile 1 day Unknown 60 Carp, Bluehead chub Observed ~60 dead carp in various stages of decay within 500 meters of the spillway. About 50% of the live carp in the area had sores on top of their head and body. Many carp and Bluehead chub were very lethargic and unresponsive. Aquatic Toxicity Monitoring Acute and/or chronic toxicity tests are used to determine toxicity of discharges to sensitive aquatic species (usually fathead minnows or the water flea, Ceriodaphnia dubia). Results of 226 Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs these tests have been shown by several researchers to be predictive of discharge effects on receiving stream populations. Many facilities are required to monitor whole effluent toxicity (WET) by their NPDES permit or by administrative letter. Other facilities may also be tested by DWQ’s Aquatic Toxicology Unit (ATU). Per Section 106 of the Clean Water Act, the ATU is required to test at least 10 percent of the major discharging facilities over the course of the federal fiscal year (FFY). However, it is ATU’s target to test 20 percent of the major dischargers in the FFY. This means that each major facility would get evaluated over the course of their five-year permit. There are no requirements or targets for minor dischargers. The ATU maintains a compliance summary for all facilities required to perform tests and provides monthly updates of this information to regional offices and DWQ administration. Ambient toxicity tests can be used to evaluate stream water quality relative to other stream sites and/or a point source discharge. Thirty NPDES permits in the Roanoke River basin currently require WET testing. Twenty-seven permits have a WET limit; the other three facilities permits specify monitoring but do not have a limit. Across the state, the number of facilities required to perform WET has increased steadily since 1987, the first year that WET limits were written into permits in North Carolina. Consequently, compliance rates have also risen. Since 1998, the compliance rate has stabilized at approximately 90-95 percent. The following graph summaries WET monitoring compliance in the Roanoke River basin from 1987 to 2004. Facilities with toxicity problems during the most recent two-year review period are discussed in subbasin chapters. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 198 7 198 9 199 1 199 3 199 5 199 7 199 9 200 1 200 3 Year Fa c i l i t i e s M o n i t o r i n g 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Co m p l i a n c e ( % ) No. Facilities % Meeting Permit Limit NPDES facility whole effluent toxicity compliance in the Roanoke River basin, 1987-2004. The compliance values were calculated by determining whether facilities with WET limits were meeting their ultimate permit limits during the given time period, regardless of any SOCs in force. Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs 227 Ambient Monitoring System The Ambient Monitoring System (AMS) is a network of stream, lake and estuarine stations strategically located for the collections of physical and chemical water quality data. North Carolina currently has 365 water chemistry monitoring stations statewide, including 22 stations in the Roanoke River basin. Between 23 and 32 parameters are collected monthly at each station. These locations were chosen to characterize the effects of point source dischargers and nonpoint sources such as agriculture, animal operations, and urbanization within watersheds. The locations of these stations are listed in the following table and shown on individual subbasin maps. Notable ambient water quality parameters are discussed in the subbasin chapters. Refer to 2005Roanoke River Basinwide Assessment Report at http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us/bar.html for more detailed analysis of ambient water quality monitoring data. Ambient Monitoring Stations in the Roanoke River Basin by Subbasin, 1999-2004. Subbasin Station Location Class County 01 N0150000 Dan River at NC 704 near Francisco C Tr Stokes 02 N1400000 Mayo River at SR 1358 near Price WS-V Rockingham 03 N2300000 Dan River at SR 2150 near Wentworth WS-IV Rockingham N24300001 Smith River at SR 1714 near Eden WS-IV Rockingham N24500002 Smith River at NC 14 at Eden WS-IV Rockingham N3000000 Dan River at SR 1761 near Mayfield C Rockingham 04 N3500000 Dan River at NC 57 at VA Line at Milton C Caswell 05 N41100003 Hyco Creek at US 158 near Leasburg C Caswell N4250000 Hyco River Below Afterbay Dam near Mcghees Mill C Person N44000004 Marlowe Creek at SR 1322 near Woodsdale C Person N4510000 Hyco River at US 501 near Denniston VA III NT Halifax N4590000 Mayo Creek at SR 1501 near Bethel Hill C Person 06 N5000000 Nutbush Creek at SR 1317 near Henderson C Vance 07 N6400000 Smith Creek at US 1 near Paschall C Warren 08 N7300000 Roanoke River at NC 48 at Roanoke Rapids WS-IV CA Halifax N8200000 Roanoke River at US 258 near Scotland Neck C Halifax N8300000 Roanoke River at NC 11 near Lewiston C Martin 09 N8550000 Roanoke River at US 13 And US 17 at Williamston C Martin N9250000 Roanoke River 1.3 Mi Ups Welch Creek near Plymouth C Sw Martin N9600000 Roanoke River at NC 45 at Sans Souci C Sw Bertie N9700000 Albemarle Sound at Batchelor Bay near Black Walnut B Sw Bertie 10 N8950000 Cashie River at SR 1219 near Lewiston C Sw Bertie 1Sample collection at station N2430000 began on 7/24/00. 2Sample collection at station N2450000 ceased on 6/21/00. 3Sample collection at station N4110000 ceased on 6/21/00. 4Sample collection at station N4400000 was temporarily suspended on 10/7/03. 228 Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs Lakes Assessment Program Eleven Roanoke River Basin lakes were sampled in June through September of 2004. Generally, lake conditions were similar to previous years. Farmer Lake and Lake Roxboro had elevated chlorophyll a and dissolved oxygen concentrations; however, all other parameters were normal. While blue-green algae dominated the phytoplankton assemblages in Farmer Lake, Lake Roxboro had a diverse assemblage including species that may cause taste and odor problems in drinking water. Lakes with noted water quality impacts are discussed in the appropriate subbasin chapters. See the table below for a list of the lakes and their characteristic information. Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs 229 230 Appendix IV – Water Quality Monitoring Programs Lakes Assessment – Roanoke River Basin RATING KEY: S = Supporting; R = Not Rated; I = Impaired KEY Water Quality Standards: NCE = No Criteria Exceeded; E = Criteria exceeded in less than 10% of the measurements OR criteria exceeded but number of sampling trips less than 10; CE = Criteria Exceeded – parameter is problematic, highly productive, or exceeds the standard in >10% of samples; ND = No Data – samples not taken for this parameter. KEY Other Data: N = Indicates that the parameter is within the target or has not occurred per available information; Y = Exceeds target or has occurred; ND = No Data – samples not taken for this parameter Subbasin 030201 030204 030205 030206 030207 030208 Lakes Ambient Program Name Hanging Rock Lake Kernersville Reservoir Belews Lake Farmer Lake Lake Roxboro Roxboro City Lake (Lake Isaac Walton) Mayo Reservoir Hyco Lake Kerr Reservoir Lake Gaston Roanoke Rapids Lake Trophic Status (NC TSI) Oligotrophic Eutrophic Oligotrophic Eutrophic Eutrophic Eutrophic Mesotrophic Mesotrophic Mesotrophic Mesotrophic Oligotrophic Mean Depth (meters) 1 5 15 5.5 6 3.5 9 6.1 10.7 6 5 Volume (106m3) 0.003 0.4 228 6.5 11 0.3 105 99 448 512 96 Watershed Area (mi2) 0.8 3.5 46.3 48.3 23.9 196.1 51.4 188 7610.8 8293.4 8294.2 Assessment Unit Name Cascade Creek Belews Cr (Kernersville Reservoir) Belews Cr. (including Belews Lake below elev. 725) & West Belews Cr. (W. Belews Cr. Arm of Belews Lake below elevation 725) County Line Creek (Farmer Lake) South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro) Storys Creek [Roxboro City Lake (Lake Issac Walton)] Mayo Cr (Maho Cr) (Mayo Res) Hyco R., including Hyco Lake below elevation 410) Nutbush Creek Arm of John H. Kerr Reservoir (below normal pool elevation 300 ft MSL…) Roanoke River (Lake Gaston below normal full power pool elevation 200 MSL) Roanoke River (Lake Gaston below normal ….) Classification B WS IV C WS-IV WS-IV WS- II, HQW WS-II, B, HQW WS-II, HWQ WS-V WS-V, B B WS-V, B WS-IV, B W- IV, B, CA Assessment Unit 22-12-(2) 22-27-(1.5) 22-27-(7) 22-27-9-(4) 22-27-(7.5)22-56-(3.5) 22-58-4-(1.4) 22-58-12-(1.5)22-58-15-(0.5)22-58-(0.5) 23-8-(2) 23-(12) 23-(20.2)23-(22.5) Stations in Assessment Unit ROA003A ROA0092A ROA009J ROA009G ROA009E, 009H ROA027J, 027L, 027G ROA0303DA, 0303DC, 0303DE ROA031C, 031E, 031H ROA0343A, 0342A, 0341A ROA030C, 030E, 030F, 030G ROA037A, 037E, 037I, 0371J ROA038A, 039 ROA039B ROA039C, 039D, O39E NL1 NL2 NL6 NL4 NL3, NL5 NL7-NL9 NL11-NL13 NL17-NL19 NL20-NL22 NL10, NL14-NL16 NL23-NL26 NL27-NL28 NL29 NL30-NL32 Number of Sampling Trips 12 8 11 11 11 12 11 4 3 3 6 5 5 3 Water Quality Standards Chlorophyll a >40 ug/L NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE Dissolved Oxygen <4.0 mg/L NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE pH <6 s.u. or > 9 s.u. NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE Turbidity >25 mg/L NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE E (9%) NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE Temperature >32°C Lower Piedmont & Coastal Plain NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE E (33%) NCE NCE NCE NCE Metals (excluding copper, iron & zinc) 15A NCAC 2B .0211 ND NCE ND ND ND NCE NCE NCE NCE ND ND NCE NCE ND Other Data % Saturation DO >120% N N N N Y (9%) Y (8%) Y (9%) N N N N N N N Algae Documented blooms during 2 or more sampling events in 1 year with historic blooms N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Fish Kills related to eutrophication N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Chemically/Biologically Treated For algal or macrophyte control - either chemicals or biologically by fish, etc. N N N N N N N N N N N Y Y N Macrophytes Limiting access to public ramps, docks, swimming areas; reducing access by fish and other aquatic life to habitat N N N N N N N N N N N Y Y Y Sediments Clogging intakes – dredging program necessary; Frequent public/agency complaints - visual N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Rating: S NR S S S NR S NR NR NR NR NR NR NR