20011511 Ver 2_Application_20071015

.~
Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name ~~ S1 ~V
2. Name of Property OwnerJA~
3. Name of Consultant/Agent:
"Agent authorization needs to be aitac~ed.
DI -15~i ~~
PAYMENT
RECEI~~E~~
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): <,, ~} -- 2.c~Ce •- ~I`7 C~Z ~ ~ tp ~
5. Site Address:
6. Subdivision Name: -~~~_`~~ ~ r~S ~~.~
7. City: ~~~`lTl
8. County: 1/l ~ ~~ ~ ') f~
9. Lat: s S~, '~.Lv~(~ Q bu Long:~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .(Decimal Degrees Please )
10. Quadrangle Name: 1Y1°'~-1 ~ 15'5© ~ ~
11.. Waterway: V PPS ~T~~
12. Watershed: O~ ?571 ~ Q ~ ~ ~2 ~ ~ ~~~
13. Requested Action:
~iationwide Permit #
_ General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
_Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps ofl"ice:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM
Autborization: Section 10
Project Description! Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Section 404
Begin Date
OCT 1 ~ 2007
DENR -WATER QUALITY
1NETlIWp~4 AND STQRM1uATER BRANCH
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

61-15ii ~z
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
1. Owner/Applicant Information Q (; T 1 ~ 2007
Name: Beltway Properties, LLC cttir~ wA}.~rt~~
Mailing Address: 9450 W. Byrn Mawr Wl;TUWD~ auD STOtt!41l,NATCR BRANCH
_ Suite 150
Rosemont Illinois 60018
Telephone Number: 847-447-5020 Fax Number: 847-671-0740
E-mail Address: jschaefer(a~~verpar.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer Petrykowski
Company Affiliation: Estes Design, Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 79133
Charlotte NC 28271
Telephone Number: 704-841-1779 Fax Number: 704-841-1842
E-mail Address: Jennifer(a~,EstesDesign.com
v~tea iiii~aoos
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Beltway Business Park
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PII~: 05320102 and 05320127
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg County Nearest Town: Paw Creek Township
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Beltwav Business Park
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take I-85 to Sam Wilson
Road West From Sam Wilson Road make a ri~llt on to Performance Road. Site is west of
UPN TV Station.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.260000 °N 81.985833 °W
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Tributary to Catawba River
8. River Basin: Catawba
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is under development as commercial\industrial
property The land use in the vicinity of the property consist of a mixture of commercial,
residential and undeveloped land.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project involves the subdivision of the~roperty into commereial~ndustrial lots and the
construction of office/ warehouse space The project will involve the use of bulldozers
trackhoes and a road grader.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To fill an area to allow for a building footprint
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
This project was previously permitted and mitigation funds laid to the EEP/WRP. The original
permit expired November 30, 2003. See Action I.D. SAW-2006-41762-361. An additional 5.55
acres were added to theproject to expand the development.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts consist
of a total of 0.32 acres of wetlands impacted by filling for building foundations. These
impacts are shown on, the attached site plan Exhibit 4)
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100 year
Floodplain
es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
A Fill Forested Linear no 146 0.22
B Fill Forested Linear no 176 0.10

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.32
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.94
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
More Im ct Impact
Length

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)
none

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9

Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

{lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)
none

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U. S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act (acres): 0
Wetland Im act (acresj: 0.32
Open Water Impact (acres}: 0
Total Im act to Waters of the U. S. (acres) 0.32
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
__ The 86 acre site impacts have been minimized to the extent feasible by limiting road
crossin sgL and preserving a total of 2.55 acres of wetland.
Updated IIJI/2005
Page 5 of 9

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to enswe that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite}, affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
This Project has expanded with the addition of another parcel X05320127) and under a new
developer. Under the,_,previous permit ,Action I.D. SAW-2006-41762-361, 0.07 acres of
wetlands and 2801inear feet (lf) of streams were mitigated through payment into the NCEEP
(previously NCWRP). The expanded project will impact 0.32 acres of wetlands but will also
preserve 1.7 additional acres of new wetlands and 302 If of additional intermittent stream
under protective covenants. T'he on ig pal project combined with the additional parcel will
preserve a total of 2.55 acres of wetlands.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9

that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) I SA NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9

Zone* ( ~ ~) Multiplier R~~~
Miti lion
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
'~ Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Stormwater requirements per Mecklenburg County .have been previously implemented. See
Action I.D. SAW-2006-41762-361.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The ~propertv is serviced by Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utilities.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9

Wet ponds have been included in this project and designed according to local ordinances.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatenepecies, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
/d/~~
~-~''Appl~can't/Agent's Signature Date`
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated l I!il2005
Page 9 of 9

Environmental Design 8 Consullig~
Agent Certification Of Authorization
I V~~ representing ~~~ ~~~~~? ~ ~
Of Address:
~~ Y~vs ~~~~5

~ ~s~~<~ ~~ ~o~a~~'
do hereby certify that I have authorized Estes Design Inc. environmental design and
consulting to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing,
issuance and acceptance of this permit and any and all standard and special conditions
attached.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
r~
~'~~~-
plicant's signature Agent's sig ature
Date Date
• P.O. Box 79133 Charlotte, N.C. 28271-7050 • Phone [phone]f Fax [phone] •

~# GE~slSi!'1 1
Environmental Design 8 Consulting
r.o. sox r~tss cnarloUe. NC Za27t
Project Beltway Bttsiness Park
Name:
Praject No.: 0664 Sample No.: 2
Date: 6/07
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Bv:
CJE
Do Normal Circumstances exist on site? No Community ID: OI
Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Yes Field Map No.:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: B
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morohological adaptations to wetlands with a')
Dominant Plant Snccies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Quercus Rubrum T FAC 9.
2~ Fraxinus americanus T FACU 10.
3. Acer negundo T FACW 11. Juncus effusus H FACW+
~ Acer rubrum T FAC 12. Fescue H
5. 13. Andropogon virginicus H FAC-
6. 14.
7.
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(except FAC-). Include species noted (*) as showing
morphological adaptations to wetlands
Describe Morphological Adaptations:
Remarks:
All woody species are young suggesting previous agricultural use no earlier than 4-6 years ago.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
_ _Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks

Drill Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
llepth to Free Water in Pit NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
USDA soil survey describes brief flooding and apparent high water table Nov. -May

enrr c
Map Unit Name: Moncan Mo Drainage Class: SPD
Taxonomy Field Observations
(Subgroupj: Confirm Mapped Type? Yes: No:X
Fine, Loamy mixed thermic Fluvaquntic
Eutrochrepts
Profile Description:
Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth (inches) Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mnnsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres. etc.
0-b" A SYR 4/b none none Sandy loam
7-14" B l OYR 4/3 SY S!S few/distinct Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed in Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils Lists
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
USDA soil survey describes brief flooding and apparent high water table Nov. -May
WF.Ti,AND DF.TF.RMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
This is an example of an upland area adjacent to wetlands.

~e ~, :.,~
Environmental Design & Consulting
P.O. Bax 79133 Ctnrkrile, NC 28271
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERNIINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Sample No.: 1
Bv: CJE
oI
loo Normal Circumstances exist on site? No Community ID:
Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Yes Field Map No.:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: A
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
V ~V G 1 A 11V1`I tivote mole s ecies ooservea ro nave morpnow cap aaapranons ro weuanas wnn a
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum T FAC 9.
'- ~ Acer negundo T FACW 10.
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica T FACW 11.
4- Fraxinus americanus T FACU 12.
5 ~ Ulmus Americana T FACW 13.
6' 14
7.
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
~~ (except FAC-). Include species noted (*) as showing
morphological adaptations to wetlands. 6/9 = 66%
Dominant Plant Species Stratt-m Indicator
Sagiteria H OBL
Paspalum laeve -wetland grass H FACVIN
Juncos effuses H FACW+
Carex sp. H FACW
Andropogon virginicus H FAC-
II Describe Morphological Adaptations:
'I Remarks:
This sample plot is in a Forested wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
X Aerial Photographs
_____Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
x_ Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 inches
x Water Marks

Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Depth of Surface Water: 1-8" (in.) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit __(in.)
x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
This site is underlain with bedrock. Groundwater is primary source of hydrology with frequent flooding from adjacent stream.
Project Beltc~ay Business Park
Name:
Pr~iect No.: 0664
Date: 6/07

Map Unit Name: Monean Me Drainage Classy SPD
Taxonomy Field Observations
(Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes: No:X
Fine. Loamy mixed thermic Fluvaquniic
Eutrochrepts
Profile Description:
Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Denth (inches} Horizon (Mansell Moist} (Mansell Moist} Abundance;Contrast Rhizosp$eres, etc.
0-6" A SYR 4/b SY 5/1 few/disitnct Clay loam
7-14" I3 10YR4/3 SY 5/1 Many/prominent clay loam
Hy_ dric Soil Indicators:
Histosol x Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Consent in Surface Layer
Sulfidic Odor x Organic Streaking
x Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed in Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils Lists
x Gleyed orLow-Chrome Colors x Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
This sample are is underlain with shalow bedrock
WETLAND DETERMIPfA"i'ION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~ No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ® No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Remarks:
USDA soil survey describes brief flooding and apparent high water table Nov. -May Shallow bedrock prevents exfiltration of available groundwater.
Wetland is Located adjacent to confluence of intermittent stream.

0 :-,
I J
q -9-V
'W'WOS Chp.10
, J
'APO e Fla O%%Odk,,
SITE
MOO" cham p.:,
S
�11
Charlotte
Estes Design Inc. Beltway Project Site
Mecklenburg County NC
Lnvironmental Design & Consulting
.0. Box 79133 Charlotte, N.C. 28271 Location Map Exhibit 1

z ~'. _ _' ; _ y ~
I ~ z

}'~ jy ~ ~ ^? -.. i~./, "3 ~ v`:A wdfVLn rt, ~! I\~ ~ ~'-t ~c \ ~u7'1
r'
I ~
1 , ' _
~
9hi~ly. Br¢o
k l(~`
1 7~•• ~ '~• ° p •J Y
~1'
t ~ i
i ( - ~ ~.~ ~>
.
y
4
4r .
t
„~
~
~
`
~
~~ ~
~~
-
~ ~ t ~.fi, __ r ~ ~ ~
i
~
'
~
~
,
_ .r~. .~ ~_, ' _ ~ ~:r.
~; ~ - _
-.=-- ~, ~ ~- ~ ~ - ~ r
YYr SITE - ,
~ ;~Q>rF~,
. r. ~ -~-~ .
~~
~
z a~„so r_~ i
~
a~ ~ .r~---~ - i ~ ~
xa ~ r ~; ~ ~ ~,~. ~~ z

N
.:Ki-•CxG~' I ` C I. I
"-__ .: .. P~'E
1 ~, ~ ~ ~
~
~1 - >
IN
_ ~
t
E.
~ J•- d

..
-f ~~ y57
a`vL~ ~y .i`~ti~ ~,. '' Ch..f~ .. \ i + r./~,.
e)~B~G ~1 1
I -
~'
~
1
~
^7 I a~-Rkmxi. k:~. Li~
\
r
~ .1 f ~ +..)\' / _ / ~`t.`~..
_ r .
~
~ ~/ ~' h ~ ~>P° .- - I e Para ~ L e >,
'~ " ~~ !~ (.
`. ~
+~ r-,.
1
lRGi'F~
~ ~
2g
~
.
-
~ r .-.
1
' ~
k xJ ~ ,l~. r ~ i '^
'` ~`
I
o
. ,
.,
r f~, „~~ r ~. ~
..
.

~ ;rl;
.t ' ~' sV~ `' ,' \ W'r,rt )1 4M LurLt m~ _ .bLJf~~.
~ .' euLh ~,t. .t ttritrAt*- ~
e
v ~ .k'~
ri
4,t '
~~
~` I
.~ } ~
.. '
`y, ~~~' II~ ~ t V _ ~ _ 1
rin ~qu '~\~•.
~
~, ..'~~.4 3 ro~ -' ~ ._'" 4 ,
.. ~#@Q'µF` a ~i
J,•
~~'
~
':
`
~
a k
.
t6:'5,
w~' M , :~~ Qa
~
} 3.-:
1
t . P~~
~
~d
1 t~ ti ~ A(<6'z/- I.~ t L7~-
t ~YE,` JII bil:
~
~
W
~~asa~ w ¢ :_
r. r`v"'soro~a ;i~ ~ r hi r ~ ~~
q l~ J
P y~ Ta k
1
'. r; y T B~rccvaaa ,• ,
~~~ r ~~,
.- m =' ~ rA ~: .
~
.
o.
. -r ~;.a.~ k(
j, L ci: ~ tisaCl ~ SewaCa 1(`)i \ EY
.
,
r~

m
ry \ ` y s

k
..\, ~ >~ ~ , e.r=' ~._'~,,,. ~ :. by `,; -'~
`1. RO~q' F ~..
-S L ~ 1 1 ~,.
.' , ,~ b'.~ ~ r.._ y
~
m
N
~
~ \
47.
\ 1z~j'
~ l J ~ ~ /C Y yJ
i 's w ~ L
~
~~
In
to
m . y )
rtgr
r ~, ~ r ~
~~~ ~ 'a_ ~ `
AFL:. ~ .j"~e p..,ti.s m

t 5 .~M = - ~~ ,-1~ r~ 1. ~ -5~~ ~ l a~, 4 ~~ Ali --._ c -, -

I ~
~
_
~ ~
~ ~ t
~ -.. .~
t
~
~ ~~ d. I
Y !

80.98333° W 80.96667° W WGS84 80.95000° W
,tMt1
MN }~TN ~-~-~-'r,~-~-~
7y,^ll g~~,p6ptkFl 0_ _~+~"A~ _ _7000R~fifO$
9 Printed from TOPO! ®101 National GeograpYdc Ho4~ng (www.to~ com)
Estes Design Inc. Beltway Project Site
Mecklenburg County NC
Environmental design & Consulting
r,. Sox ; X7133 Charln:-c, V.(;. 282!1 USGS Topo Map Exhibit 2

l
/~ _ .'-tib, 4 +ice,,, f% '� ��•!`� :.'Xt�F Atf•�,h y� e� y
71
10
co
1e
r '4r Additional
y c, property added ' s
SITE
e 'i ;tea , x r , a 1 �.•,. � .
y . �t �•4 p ebb
I '
'I . �.✓• qJ 1.44
' •, .... .Via � �_ l *i
1 iii?
..A /'J'A d 4
Estes Design Inc. Beltway Project Site
environmental Design & Consulting Mecklenburg County NC
P.O. Box 79133 Charlotte, N.C. 28271 Mecklenburg County GIS Map Exhibit 3

81W 00' 32"
499,200.0
35N lb' 45"
v and nnn n

Iti-drolol;ic l'nitr (t1'atcrshed~)
7kN11`<- u'V~TcR GUALI'tY
WE'TlAND3 Ai~D STOR!NF~RTL•~2 BRAtd~F1
sr 22'•
16' 45"
~letn-liolitan Art~~~
~arnr: t"-:rrl.i•:;• iii<t~:x~.r.:Z..~l Ili I `~t tir
12~,~itni `amt: ~_r..'...;:\tl!r'.ic-(iualZc,c,:;~a
Itt;!iun •umtrtr•; i:3
~uhrt+l;inn ~:[rnr• ~. I~:•::• 4aeto_+
tiuhrt•~inrt \unthrr: ' + ;~
:\reaur[IinL l nit ~amc: ~a~tr;c
.\[~cnuntittL t nit \utnber: '. ..
C:tf:[Ita;~irr;. l nil \anit: l _'a [':.Lr~+t'.r. tit!r;'i [-5rcd ia. ti~r.::n C:r+.~ ut1.
Calaltr;!in~~ l nit \umbti; :~i;ii~ir,itl 1ur:•l~o_ii '~4'atcr5:7t~1 (1~1'.l; tr
Estes Design Inc.
~~
environmental Uesign & Consulting
?.Q. fox 19133 Charlo~~e, U.C. 28271
ltu;uh
~anrt: 1• :cr:•lr.:~ h..na~ :~~
('train t ir.
[ UUnI~ ~~:Iml: ~~lcii.lerbaig Ceuntr
Beltway Project Site
Mecklenburg County NC
USGS Map Exhibit 4
Beltway Business Park, Charlotte, North Carolina
80W S9' 28" $0 W 58' 25"
500,800.0 502,400.0
~~,? 1 ~, 2a(~7
lilciitif~ Ile~ult•

~~ „'~{ ,
..~ ~ .-~ ~.. ~; ~~ -~ Vii' ~,.rr: _~-, a
ihi~ Soil surv+ty was comprieJ in 1970 Ly
the U. 5 Department tit Agric~ILUre 50!1
Conservation Service and cooperating
aFenr„ies.
~ ~~~~
~~
ocr 1 ~. zQO~ U
~Nh - Vl',47'°
~~4pSrp~~~~~lTy
""°~
,~
j_ r L ~ -r
1
Estes- Design lnC. Beltway Project Site
Mecklenburg County NC
Environmental Design & Consulting
P.O. Box 79133 Charlo^C, u.c. 23271 ..,,, Soils Map Exhibit 5

Civittek Associates
caw vlr.~w s...,ro
1318 E9 Canlw •w. [phone]
p1O1~'' ~ ~ FAX [phone]
OWNER:
iwNiet ka Cen L-SOa3
N/F
ERANKLlN J. JOFM'N'iOPI t
NIF NlLDA SANDERSON
063-201-Y2
MB IT PG 435
RESIOEN7IAL USE
ZONED R-3
~ronr.Tt .-r r~u
ICINITY 11~AP prs

1
L `1 ~
,t q
~
//
1.~ ~
~
~
/
r PIPE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
r
NDT'22'S3•w •3' L`~
6~1
u
.,~~~

r>=RwRnnNCE RD., ~ioorgx REEVES //
E NARBOR DR
' 7 y
o~ I 1~ 2 Q ~ 7
3 rrr. ISL
.
212
cw~RUxTE, Nc zr321~3
(~04~-391-eaeo ~~
pENR -1NAT>R 4UALITY
/ ~ WETIANDSAMD S70R!aMIATER
~~
~\g _
A pDi'n ~J AL,
~
zn «..e
~~
ran,.ry ~"
IM,907 eq, Ft.
3.33 acre3
N/F
LEON~AREDA~
Or..3~-20t-a'TE
DB ID62 PG 136
RESIDENTU+L U5E
ZONED R-3
3.33 ACRES ZONED RE51DEN71AL
( UNDER CANTRAG'r AND 70 BE REZONED tNDUSTRUIL).
O RECOMBINATION MAP
~ of
"r /~ BELTWAY BUSINESS PARK
P~,L
'~ ! Paw Creek Toumshi~
state: t'=zoo' Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
4/f 7/OS ~~P RacoraiQd R I(arp Book At Fagg
To Bt Conveyed To

N£TLAND n
New Area
.\
N/F
FRED ~7A'9 ~ RCH
NB 17 PG 317
~ \
FleD o. "~cFNUxa
OS]-131-Oe /
OB 1045 PC 862
//
/
0~
~0~~0~09
e"
/fit O~ )00\
wF e
r
~ ~ N~
muJKUN J. J7HNSa+ k
\ NF NILDA SANOERSON
as3-:D1-11
~~T\ NB it PG 4]5 ..
00X110 EM\
JOHNSON ..- ~'
057-101-10
NB 1] PO f75 ...
I. TA%PARCEL. 05}101-02
1. TOTAL ACREAGE i0R OE`ffAOPNEMi: 100,9] AC.
CHANNEL ]
f N/f
JERKY OAIE PRICE
8 NF PAVU AU7EN
051-201-01
\ OB 7620 PG 30e
\\
Yk1UND n
Le 1A}1 ~ r '] us e.74
L]e n.x
l9 81.67 1' 'N ~7 2274
L10 18.30 T ~ 31.17 ] Y
N/F LI7 31.78 i'
tE0NA9Dl~ I N~ ll1 10.17 N L79 77.OD T
'0.M5~A74GN1U~0FjR` SXAAPE H. CRA1C R. Lit 40.43 '17'w L/O S9A5 1'1
D0 1851 PC 176 ~ py}101-13 U{ 15.19 74' i'N LN 29.95 N
~ n Pc ne ul 1b57 x u
LIS I7, 73 N '4 ~ U7 65.16 x77' '
' LI6 70.72 LN BABS N
L17 77.85
ue 7o.n __...w wETLANO p

J
/
~i ' /
~^ ~
I
2

1 l .

l

J

~
tt
~
~
\
/ \
,
1
N
NEM0.91AL PAESBYIERIAN
alJAal musiEEs
05}Iµ-01
OB 7571 PG 177
~~ 7T ~\
161 / JIMMYNL NODGES \
,160 k NF BECKY J.
057-141-7]
~ 3 OB 5110 PC 699
l .shm
/ o
v~~o (js~/ 115Y
CHANNEL 1 / a' e \ \
\
/ MARSrAi ~ iNa1A5 m
i
auA
s
,
H
k ~usAae-
S>3,
~ E
19 DB 10807 PG 817
1
~W ~ /
~ ~ \~
u,ry~
N ~
M8 Q~
ry~/
I
=
{{
~ /
z~~dTJ~~/p
}'3~a`8
,
~ \Y N I
8~
~
g.
~
m
~ ~ ~:,, A~ ~18g
58232'39'E S]8'7B'1/'E W"'n y /
387.83' 17.92. 5)4 =~gC,,v@@yt'
19753~~ N)S3)J ~~,~7h/
W 0 0 /
BD. PU Bp.)g 2 /
~ Any
GRAPHIC SCALE
7w o ~ '~
( DI FBL7' ~
I D,eh - zao n
WEMNOS ACRES 50. FT.
1 OJ7 aC 71,766
1 O.1B AC 8,159
J 0.12 AC 8,674
TOTAL 1.11 AC µ,%9
~`~B ~ ._- I~~
~- !j
91E %/~
~wiwv wo ._.~r_. _..
~ i
~ a
~w( ~ M
W ~
a
. w+ m o
U Z ~.
0"
c
Q `
0
w~i o_ ' ~
W Q N
_ ~
+, e o N
C
~ ~ U Z
w
ao
'~ w
U ~o
ro ~
'u
eNra+9~~ rw
~..wir°i: °i:~
,°wa'i~i sa~n:
oim
ti
U
a~
~~~
~ In ~ ~
~ tiO 2
~O ~W
~~ O
~yU
S
EW ~ ~
"4 y
U
5
rc
Drown by
JRP/WRH
Approved by
F.I.C.
Date.
5/8/00
JOC DOn1e:
PEAFOR/WERANDS
xcle:
h=zoo' {H~
Sheet No. (v)
1 Dr 1
N/F
PEAFOIOIANLE RO, IP
O$}101-11
NB 17 PG 473
/ - 100 CIA55_A' BUFTFA
~1
b
h0•
MB IS PG 117 ; / ~~
.hw ~ / _' bw
"'~"~ ~
/ L53
/ 151 E7
~ G~'~?t
/ L4B ~J ~
~9
~7/
a/ g j
~ 5,
~ ~~
ll
DNANNEL 1 ~ ~91
L~ 0
L64 ~`
~ ~
y119
N
HERSNELL 0. PORTER
k ~roE ONE F.
OB 1731 PG S7l
N
CNARIE CENTON
iTRWAID
037-I/5-07
OB ]981 PG fi01
1
1
f~~2 M~~
9~`.'l%
QC~ ~ ;~ Z401
~pL1P~~~~
~~~
w)aNU tE7JCn+
t 1.081.18'
1 503.3]'
3 995.15'
10TAL 7.379.87'
[HANN0. ei
T11S CERTFlES THAT MI5 COPY OF THIS PUi ACCIIAAI0.Y OFPIC75
T1E BWNDARY OF JJfiSOICTON a SECTON 104 a TIE CIEAN NA7ER
ACT AS OETOtY01ED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON 7HiS DAtE. WBE55 THERE
IS A CHANCE LY TIE UN OF WA PUBUSNFD REGUUTp15 iW5 OE7ERNINA110N
OF SECTON 104 31A19gCTCN NAY BE REIJED UPON 107 A PERNq NOi TD
ExCEED N`k (5) YEARS FROM OAIE T8S DEIERNINAT(N: WA$ NADE U70.QING
THE 1987 C0N5 OF ENGINEERS IIETLWO OFLNEATON MANUAL
NAME
PRE:
DATE:
MAP
CXANNEI 12
UNE LEncnl ~ARxc
L111 83.80
LI11 131.11
L11] 301.51
u11 6.05
LI15 191.81
1118 8.10
L117 101.43
L118 137.55
UI9 57.86
CHANNEL ~3

75 0U55'A' WRER .idVLE
2CT STORM ORANAGE EA5EAI~T
~TANNG WA4. tA5 REQ'D7
`30' 1iIE ~'LGEg5lNt
_____ _~_ ___ ______ __~IAT_i._.i„~~.
6UIl,DW6 'B'
240'X1000'=240,000 5F
FUTURE PI1A5E II '~
,'~
,, ~ ,i .
~~ ~1
ti ~~
,~aR~ ~,,A`' ',
v `,
0
~~ ~ 1
/~I~ 11
~ ~
r ' 11 1
`I ~
1
'~ wr ~ FUTURE PI1A5E III ~',
1 ~";,~' NO IMPACT TO `, ,
WETLANDS
ANTICIPATED ~~~~ ~',
~~ 1
!~
3 \ o ~ ~p01 ~,
~ ',,
1
---- ~ ~C
----------------------------- - ~~''~ w 1~' '
----------~ UEN~'wgS0St~R~9RIJ~
q~
'~
SITE PLAN ~~
~~~
D 50'100' 200' 500'
-------------------------

a5 ~ ~~~
~ 'r; ~
~
z
~PE~
-
`~ ,
S
ae
Rrin
.wErPi~EO
}6 ~
rorxo Po
a
a a~
~~
~ ~~
A~
s~~
8
~Z
xs w.~.
ppyJlEp IM.~f Ew•
o x~aw w'
,n ~
nv IaES ioPEO PFEIffi+~PE
~~..sP (p~P%~ aL ~0 Y RRWfG yp~5iP10.~
V D
~~
~~ pp1
v ~~..t~~~~~
~ ~~R~~1~a~'~
0~~,,~p9
~r lvE
5EM~
W1. =rt~i TPn v~.
ICE '~~p~p j
REV, NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
PRELIYINAAY y ~Sa ;. _:
.~ f H ~;
IIABTER PlJ1H F011
BELTWAY BUSINESS PARK & I
BELTWAY BLVD. EXTENSION
i cHAALO~, NOPTH CAROLINA

CAMPCO ENGINEERING, INC. I
166 OAI0.AXD AVEIAIE AIXiE HILL. 8C 28781 '
PN. 6W 8YT•T1Y1 FA% 80.9.927-7816
EMAIL: CIJIPWE6GYPCOEHBIIffE67H6.C6Y '
~•. 9466R CAD FILES 4465MP07
SCALES T'' 200' ISSUED 7708-06 SHEETS 3 ~..