HomeMy WebLinkAbout820647_Routine Inspection_202302080 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 820647 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS820647 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 02/17/2023 Entry Time
Farm Name: Farm #31 / 3731
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 487
Physical Address:
10:00 am
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Sampson Region: Fayetteville
Exit Time: 11:00 am Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: 910-296-1800
Warsaw NC 283980487
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 55' 28" Longitude: 78' 30' 38"
From Rosesboro, farm is approx. 1.5 mi. out, on NC 411. The farm will be approx. 0.5 mi. on the right, past where NC 242 and NC
411 meet.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny Lee Tyner Operator Certification Number: 28715
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Norris
On -site representative Michael Norris
Primary Inspector: Diane Harrison Phone: 910-433-3343
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
9- need to clean trash from lagoon
15- alot of bare areas in field they have respriged some of the fields and added a new solid set in back fields
Page 1 of 5
Permit: AWS820647
Inspection Date: 02/17/23
Regulated Operations
Swine
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 820647
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,000 I 1,892
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 866,000
Waste Structures
Effective
Built Closed
Designated
Observed
Type
Identifier Date
Date Date
Freeboard
Freeboard
Lagoon
I A
04/26/2005
1 A/01/1995
19.90
38.00
Page 2 of 5
Permit: AWS820647 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 02/17/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
820647
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Page 3 of 5
Permit: AWS820647 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 02/17/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 820647
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Aycock
Soil Type 3
Wagram
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Page 4 of 5
Permit: AWS820647 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 02/17/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
820647
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen
❑
0❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
EEI ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5