20230358 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230307

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? *
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
11/9/2022
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20230358 1
Is a payment required for this project? *
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone] Andrew Pitner:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Oxford Station
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Amber Lipsky
1b. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/7/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Grants Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.7104
Longitude:
-80.4677
A. Processing Information
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Rowan
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
Please provide the date of the previous submission.*
2/20/2023
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 14 - Linear transportation
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Belle Realty Development
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Victor Wallace
2d. Address
Street Address
P.O. Box 102
Address Line 2
City
Salisbury
Postal / Zip Code
28145
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Reid Owen
3b. Business Name:
Meritage Homes of the Carolinas, Inc
3c. Address
Street Address
13925 Ballantyne Corporate Place
Address Line 2
Suite 300
City State / Province / Region
Charlotte NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28277 USA
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Amber Lipsky
4b. Business Name:
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, PLLC
4c. Address
Street Address
10612-D Providence Road
Address Line 2
PMB 550
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28277
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Salisbury
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
5761-01-36-2810
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
2b. Property size:
78.87
State / Province / Region
Country

3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Grants Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401030102
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is located just west of Old Mocksville Road, and just south of Spence Drive, in Rowan County, North Carolina. The topography is gently to moderately sloped. The elevation
ranges from 680 to 750 ft. The site is a mosaic of successional farmland and disturbed woodlands laced with trails. There is an overhead utility line right-of-way along Old Mocksville Road,
and a raw water line right-of-way bisecting the bisecting the site north -south.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.015
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1437
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The proposed residential development will have impacts to one stream for a road crossing for site connectivity.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes
Comments:
No Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2022-00502
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Nic Nelson
WEPG
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
This site was verified by C. Hopper (USACE) on 8/25/22. A copy of the signed DC approval is included in the Jurisdictional Determination Information section.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? *
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
Buffers
3. Stream Impacts

3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name`
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
11
Average (feet)
84
(linear feet)
S2
Road Crossing
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
11
Average (feet)
25
(linear feet)
S3
Road Crossing
Temporary
Workpad/Causeway
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
11
Average (feet)
15
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
109
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
124
3j. Comments:
Riprap will be placed at pre -construction elevations as a permanent, no loss impact.
S1-0.02 AC (permanent)
S2-0.006 AC (permanent no -loss)
S3- 0.004 AC (temporary)
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
15
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and access
routes. Impacts were limited to the extent possible while still maintaining the required connectivity and accommodating emergency vehicle access.
Retaining walls will be used to minimize impacts. City/NCDOT culvert standards prevent further impact minimizations. The applicant has demonstrated
avoidance and minimization efforts by avoiding 94% of onsite streams and 100% of onsite wetlands.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Where possible, 3:1 slopes and the maximum allowable headwalls will be used to minimize crossing impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Due to limited site impacts, no mitigation is proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply

Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Salisbury
Comments:
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to City of Salisbury but will be designed to meet their
criteria.
G. Supplementary Information O
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? *
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is except as described in the attached T&E report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
No essential fish habitat in this region.

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/
Report by R.S. Webb & Associates
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? *
www.fema.gov
https://gis.rowancountync.gov/gismaps/
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Oxford Station PCN SUBMITTED.pdf
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
A complete PCN package is attached
USACE: apologies for the duplicate submittal
13.92MB
Signature O
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Amber Lipsky
Signature
Date
3/7/2023

WEPG
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 2022 - 00502 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Oxford Station
2. Work Type: Private❑ Institutional ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
PCN request for a road crossing
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
Government ❑ Commercial ❑
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Meritage Homes of the Carolinas, Inc
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]: WEPG, PLLC c/o Amber Lipsky
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
35.7104,-80.4677
Old Mocksville Road, Salisbury, NC 28144
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 5761-01-36-2810
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Rowan
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Salisbury
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Grants Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]:Yadkin (03040103)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 �✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
U Nationwide Permit # 14
❑ Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
001 0W411IW1L069%

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
February 20, 2023
Ms. Meagan Jolly
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Andrew Pitner
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wcjoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Subiect: Pre -Construction Notification for NWP #14 for the Oxford Station site in
Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina
Ms. Jolly, Messrs. Pitner, Wcjoski, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit 914 for the Oxford Station site on 79.53 acres
located along Old Mocksville Road in Salisbury, NC. The site is a proposed residential
development and consists of two streams and one wetland. A Delineation Concurrence for the
site was verified in August 2022. Please refer to the Jurisdictional Determination Information for
information on onsite surface waters.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include permanent impacts to one
stream for a road crossing. Temporary impacts are limited to construction access to install the
proposed impacts. Total permanent impacts proposed include 84 linear feet (0.02 acres) of
stream impact (Stream A). The proposed crossing was necessary for site connectivity and
emergency vehicle access.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 1
[e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Overall impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited
through site selection location, design, and the location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. Efforts of minimization were implemented during the design to preserve existing
site hydrology and limit adverse effects to existing, onsite natural habitat. Retaining walls will be
used to minimize impacts. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and minimization efforts
by dedicating avoiding 94% of onsite streams and 100% of onsite wetlands. Due to limited site
impacts, no mitigation is proposed.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species, or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please contact
me if you have any questions, [phone] or email at amber.lipskykwetlands-epg.com.
Sincerely,
AfVbm
Amber Lipsky, WPIT Daniel Kuefler, PWS
Environmental Scientist Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 2
[e-mail]

C
O
V
d
d
Q
L.
N
CL
Permit Application

w A rE�QG
T.
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Oxford Station
2b.
County:
Rowan
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Salisbury
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Belle Realty Development
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Victor Wallace
3d.
Street address:
P.O. Box 102
3e.
City, state, zip:
Salisbury, NC 28145
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Developer
4b.
Name:
Reid Owen
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Meritage Homes of the Carolinas, Inc
4d.
Street address:
13925 Ballantyne Corporate PI, Ste 300
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Amber Lipsky
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, PLLC
5c.
Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
5761-01-36-2810
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.7104 Longitude:-80.4677
1c.
Property size:
78.87 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Grants Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
Yadkin Pee-Dee/03040103
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is located just west of Old Mocksville Road, and just south of Spence Drive, in Rowan County, North Carolina. The topography is gently to
moderately sloped. The elevation ranges from 680 to 750 ft. The site is a mosaic of successional farmland and disturbed woodlands laced with trails.
There is an overhead utility line right-of-way along Old Mocksville Road, and a raw water line right-of-way bisecting the bisecting the site north -south.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.015
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,437
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed residential development will have impacts to one stream for a road crossing for site connectivity.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑X Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
This site was verified by C. Hopper (USACE) on 8/25/22. A copy of the signed DC approval is included in the Jurisdictional Determination Information
section.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream A
PER
Corps
11
84
S2 P
Stabilization
Stream A
PER
Corps
11
25
S3 T
Construction Access
Stream A
PER
Corps
11
15
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
124
3i. Comments:
Riprap will be placed at pre -construction elevations as a permanent, no loss impact.
S1-0.02 AC (permanent)
S2-0.006 AC (permanent no -loss)
S3- 0.004 AC (temporary)
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. Impacts were limited to the extent possible while still maintaining the required connectivity and accommodating emergency vehicle
access. Retaining walls will be used to minimize impacts. City/NCDOT culvert standards prevent further impact minimizations. The applicant has
demonstrated avoidance and minimization efforts by avoiding 94% of onsite streams and 100% of onsite wetlands.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Where possible, 3:1 slopes and the maximum allowable headwalls will be used to minimize crossing impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Due to limited site impacts, no mitigation is proposed.
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
37
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Storm
water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has
not yet been submitted to City of Salisbury
but
will be designed to meet their criteria.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Salisbury
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Salisbury
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes 0 No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
[]Yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes 0 No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No
additional phases proposed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is except as described in the attached T&E report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/
Report by R.S. Webb & Associates
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
www.fema.gov
https://gis.rowancountync.gov/gismaps/
Amber LipskyAwIxA
02-20-2023
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorizatio
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

and Environmental Planning Group
Agent Authorization Letter
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Old Mocksville Road- Trexler
Property Address: Old Mocksville Road, Salisbury, NC 28144
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 5761-01-36-2810, 5761-01-37-1880
Select one: I am an interested buyer/seller
Name: Tim Sheehy
Company: Meritage Homes of the Carolinas, Inc
Mailing Address: 13925 Ballantyne Corporate Place Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28277
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Property Owner / Interested Buyer' /Other* Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknow edges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
len. [e-mail]
www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

N
_05
N
Q
05
10
Maps/Plans

aU
m x
� a
Franklin 19'-'
,544bo,
Q Kyle to Sales9
Hoishouser Cycle Shop F RldgeAd Calvary
Baptist Church
FT9,,
910
Horse & Carriage4
Freedom Bapti
a
-Catawba College
r
Spencer
Plntrye D,
East Spence
E"s`n
Rift CIF �vr
Nao SA \
n Baptist Church
` •.;.
Rd
� ay. N77
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
Oak r>79.53
ACChandelle
FarmsTrexler
>IAf
0 '�Trexin
Loop
Loop
papPYCentral
PiedmontBuilders
'y Polo
a
9110
Complete - ���p
sr 9Century
R
Greystone Village y� Re
ivartis� 19 114
[k�
71ns�e,
Goff
,ce t
COUNTRY
CLUB HILLS
North Hills Van Lathan
The Tin Man I LLC0
Metal Roofing &... vGan$
Christian School
h
�A
j
6
7
' �yelVeleyw,,,
fYracsaa�
Hoover's 24 Hour
N a
Tire Services
WW
I yw
Caciques
Overbill Rd
Hawkins Loop
m
+r
w,nasont s
ALL STAR
Prepared for:
OXFORD STATION
Drawn By:
Reviewed By:
FIGURE
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Rowan Co., NC
1
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
MERITAGE HOMES OF
BLK
ALL
a
THE CAROLINAS, INC
VICINITY MAP
,. .,.
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification
11/08/22

11r uu r
321F 008 321 F 009 -6 321 321 321 127 '� h
264 252 260
321 083
321 321
073 ; 132
PROPERTY BOUNDARY 321 235
STUDY LIMITS
79.53 AC +/-
PARCEL: 5761-01-36-2810
BELLE REALTY DEVELOPMENT
Salisb4l ETJ PO BOX102
321 SALISBURY, NC 28145
A 7".
.�
Z
321 079
321
192
321
134
L -
321
259
321
222
321 164
Y
321 162J
f�
IKLXLER Lcl
1-4
LHUN( HILL L)k KarItii A 324.01
5
611�r go
N Parcel Information Provided by 3 D 13 a ] 3* f f 325 ONA
l
I Rowan County Online GIS 2021 "J
. t 1 J +� �:XV Aulrf T } ,
Prepared for: OXFORD STATION Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Rowan Co., NC BLK ALL 2
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. MERITAGE HOMES OF
len. rind a THE CAROLINAS, INC PARCEL MAP
0, .,,
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification 11/08/22
www.wetiands-epg.com ii

r+ L� L L•. r" � �'i •3ti4T +1 � �L�'tip �i ^ .�F �
PROPERTY BOUND
STUDY
•,� �'.. •ram ■r.
74
IL
•� r t�
ryx
L'WTJ
f �'`' f 1 • } � - - 1 � _ �., ` N Yam:
Ira
pop
IN-
ti
Aerial Imagery Provided
by ••• - Maps 2021i
_ �i�R __ � .. � � - _ ' a� .. Wes• vy�`�1 ■ � i� ��. jJ ��f,�y``.
Wetlands and Environmental Plannin
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.
len. ri [e-mail]
[phone]
www.wet lands-e pg.co m

� f
• ' 11 jL�fJ I
r
live }ri /I • f / r ■ y�
�ea ter
■ PROPERTY BOUNDARY Z p• '■ _ v \
STUDY LIMITS —°
(60
\\ • . i.
• � o If_
L
2�� ■
1 ■ • ■ ! ■III _
me
Is
Q -- --
4 one
I • . 2r),nn- ■ ■ + • r I 690
►fit L11� ■' �:■ • ■ •
Clh
LOCATION : j J 1912 HAWKI . • •• . . T ■I.
f Lat: 35.7104 oN _~fi48 4 1 •
—� GRANTS CREEK {
Long:-80.4677 °W USGS QUAD
HUC:03040103 SCALE Q o
Salisbury, NC
i: i LOWER YADKIN 1987 I 1:24,000
II II r _� �_ ■ k
WEC� Prepared for: OXFORD STATION Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE
Rowan Co., NC gLK ALL 4
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. MERITAGE HOMES OF
• •
THE CAROLINAS, INC USGS MAP
' -' For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification 11/08/22

NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
Rowan County 2004
Map Unit Symbol
'cC2
'n82
Map Unit Name Acres In ADt
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes. moderately
eroded
Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
Pacolel sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes. moderately
eroded
Pacolel sandy clay loam. 810
15 percent slopes.
moderately eroded
Vance sandy clay loam. 2 to 8
percent slopes. moderately
eroded
17 r
S1
1-0
23.1
28-2
4.2
Totals for Ana of Intern' 78.7
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wedands-epg.com
Prepared for:
MERITAGE HOMES OF
THE CAROLINAS, INC
•
r41-
11)R40
Percent of A01
OXFORD STATION
Rowan Co., NC
SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
ALL
FIGURE
5
11/08/22

69 a
0
N No FEMA Floodplain as per
Rowan County Online GIS 2014
i
670' 6"
695'�
Qtw -kiiry CT I
Jd
r�� ;,: ear !tr►
U,
CA14F14T L..
71 Prepared for: OXFORD STATION
'Vetlands and Environmental Planning Group Rowan Co., NC
MERITAGE HOMES OF
THE CAROLINAS, INC FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification
www.wetiands-epg.com ii
14,
7TH 5T
i
Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE
BLK ALL 6
11/08/22

W EX-ROW—
EX-R
50'PUSLIC R/W
STREAM A
± 1,335 LF
F20WERMANENT
UT/L/TYEASEMENT
DB 934 PG 74
I icr�corinnial
30'RAWWATER L/NE EASEMENT
DB 356 PG 497
DB 356 PG 472
PB 9995PG 9709
(EXCEPT/ON5AND 6)
PROPOSED SEWER
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
POLO DR
W/DTHPUBL/CR/W
9999PG2191
V
VAR/AB/ F W/DTH
PB 9995PC
^r�ry Lbw
= 60'�UBtlER/W —
B/ KDALEDR
SHEET 1OF6
1111 METROPOLITANAVE, SUITE250
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 OXFORD STATION PROJECT LOCATION: DATE: 2/6/2023
1` www.bgeinc.com OLD MOCKSVILLE ROAD 0 125' 250'
NC LICENSE#C-4397 EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP SALISBURY,NC28144 SCALE: 1 " = 250'
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY BGE INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITYTO BGE INC.

PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
STREAM D 20'PERMANENT
NO IMPACTS UT/L/TKEASEMEVT
DB 934 PG 74
�EXCEPT/ON9) I I I 30'RAWWATERLINE EASEMENT
PROPOSED SANITARY D8356PG497
SEWER EASEMENT FOR D8356PG472
PB 9995PG 9709
FUTURE CONNECTION EXCEPT1ON5AND 6)
I
i
PROPOSED WATER �
TIE IN LOCATION
159
■
-Aql.. (� , W
a ILL rJ S �� -' ♦<%� � � �" ���wll � �' ,�o� -----� ffJ
IN
11
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT B / PROPOSED SANITARY
998 SF 10.02 AC 184 LF
EX— Ra9HL16?CyWLL-l—
Ex ROW 2 - 60" RCP AND 1 - 8'X8' RCB SEWER EASEMENT \
�Tw 50'PUBL/CR/W WITH HEADWALLS
EX —ROW BROW / 50VUBL/C R/W �
PERMANENT NO LOSS �// /+9� VAR1A&_EJJL1DTfi
STREAM IMPACT C / PB9995PC
280 SF 10.006 AC 125 LF
HEADWALL TO END OF RIPRAP %
/ PROPOSED TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
x i� R
PROPOSED SANITARY
1 ` SEWER TIE IN LOCATION
POLO DR
W/DTHPUBLICR/W
P 9999PG2191
u
10
z ,z
PROPOSED WATER
TIE IN LOCATION
= 60'7gU8HER/W —
RrW B/ KDALEDR
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 37% Imo'
SHEET 2 OF 6
1111 METROPOLITANAVE, SUITE250
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 OXFORD STATION PROJECT LOCATION: DATE: 2/6/2023
www.bgeinc.com OLD MOCKSVILLE ROAD 0 125' 250'
NC LICENSE#C-4397 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SALISBURY,NC28144 SCALE: 1 " = 250'
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY BGE INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO BGE INC.

w
0
It . s
� � 1 o
F. LEI,
STRENCI BE`9
AM BUFFE
\ \\ 'EXISTING TO OF BANK \ \V o\\\ \\\\ \ ('\J��'/�/�
CL OF STREAM
I \ \\ \\ \\ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT A
I I I PROP. F�1MP INLET LOCATION \\ \ 152 SF / 0.004 AC / 15 LF
PUMP INLET TO HEADWALL �► I a
PROP. COFFER DAM
OR OTHER APPROVE Q EQUIVALENT) — \ OP. PUMP LINE
SEGMENTAL BLOCK HEADWALL ` 3.1 SLOPE
\ \ ` Ololl
a. I
\ \ e I
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT B 83.20 LF
1 I
/ 998 SF / 0.02 AC / 84 LF 1 \\\ \ \ w 60° RCP @ 1.20% e 6011 I
/ 2 - 60" RCP AND 1 - 8'X8' RCB ° ' • a I 90
WITH HEADWALLS83.40 LF
e
s
8'X8' RCB @ 0.80% �• �O
• x � ,/ I 6a1
6 4
TJ
s / / SEGMENTAL BLOCK 1.2 6aQ
I
60" RCP @ 1.20% HEADWALL
- / a SID
•6
680
e•
678
I 25' CLASS A RIPRAP�RON
6
1-7
PERMANENT NO LOSS STREAM IMPACT C I \\\ I TO BE INSTALLED 6756
I I
280 SF / 0.006 AC / 25 LF I \ \ \\ I PRECONSTRUCTION 674� I
I \ I HEADWALL TO END OF RIPRAP I \ \1 \\ \ \\ STREAMBED ELEVATION` \ I
� 1 I
PROP. PUMP DISCHARG LOCATION I \ \ \ \ I OHWU
PROPOSED
SANITARY
SEWER
lEASEMENT
SHEET 30F6
1111 METROPOLITANAVE, SUITE250
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 OXFORD STATION PROJECT LOCATION: DATE: 2/6/2023
www.bgeinc.com OLD MOCKSVILLE ROAD 0 10' 20'
NC LICENSE #C-4397 STREAM IMPACT - PLAN SALISBURY, NC 28144 SCALE: 1" = 20'
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FORTH E SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY BGE INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO BGE INC.

i
0
tx \
/
�_�,�� f,l
UNDISTUf�CBED� III
\UFF�R_
I I / // 30
NDISTURBE
1 1 I-BuFFEV
1 1 \\
z
SHEET 4 OF 6
1111 METROPOLITANAVE, SUITE250
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 OXFORD STATION PROJECT LOCATION: DATE: 2/6/2023
.T'www.bgeinc.com OLD MOCKSVILLE ROAD 0 20' 40'
NC LICENSE #C-4397 WETLANDS IMPACT - PLAN SALISBURY, NC 28144 SCALE: 1" = 40'
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FORTH E SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY BGE INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO BGE INC.

695
690
685
680
675
670
665
663
�1111 METROPOLITANAVE, SUITE250
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
1` www.bgeinc.com
NC LICENSE #C-4397
DEEP GAP DRIVE
STA: 614+00.00 TO STA:616+00.00
- - - -
- - - - -
- - - -
- - - - - -
8" DI
— — —
PROPOSED
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - -
- - - -
— — — —
GRADE AT ROAD
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
CL
- - --
- - - --
- - - -
- -
— — — -
— — — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — —
SAN ITA
RY SEWER MH
\- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- --
- - -
- - - - - -
- - - - -
- - --
\
EXISTING GRADE AT
ROAD CL
- \-
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- -\-
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - -
----1
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
- — — — — — \
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — —
i
i
i
- - - - -
- - -
- - - - -
- - - -
607RCP OVERFLOW Of -U-1
VPER T
60" RCP OVERFLOW CU
VERT
INV = 668.50
- — — — —
—
T CL—
— —
—
INV = 668.50 AT CL
— — — — — —
— —
EMBEDDED1'
8'X8' RCB BASEFLOW GULVERT
INV = 665.33
AT CL
695
690
685
680
675
670
665
614+00 614+50 615+00 615+50 616+00 663
OXFORD STATION
STREAM IMPACT - CROSS SECTION VIEW
0 20' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1" = 40'
VERT: 1" = 4' SHEET 5 OF 6
PROJECT LOCATION: DATE: 2/6/2023
OLD MOCKSVILLE ROAD
SALISBURY, NC28144
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FORTH E SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY BGE INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO BGE INC.

CULVERT
STA:-0+50.00 TO
STA:2+50.00
695
695
-----
-----
-- —
-- ---
PROP.GRADE
-----
690
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
690
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - -
- - -
- - -
- -
-
STA
- - - - -
— — — --
9 --
- - - - -
-
-- -- -- --
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - -
--
-
685
FL
685
-----
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
PROP. HEADWALL
- - - - -
(BY OTHERS)
- - - - - -
- - -
- -
- - - - -
PROP. HEADWALL (BY
- - - - -
OTHERS)
680
zi
680
1 o.v
— — —
83.40LF — — — -----
8'X8' RCB @ 0.80%
675
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
83.20 LF
675
_
2 - 60" RCP @ 1.20%
- - - -
PROP. COFFER DAM
- - - - - -
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
(OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) — — —
— — — — — —
— — — —
— — — — —— — — — — —
670
PROP. PUMP DISCHARGE LOCATION
670
PROP. PUMP INLET LOCATION
EX. GRADEALONGP/PECL.
EX. GRADEALONGPIPEC.L.
1.0
665
665—
;Tt7
.—.
5' 2CLASS A RI
RAP APRON
- - - - -
EMBEDDED
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
-----
-----
------
------
----
-----
0 20' 40' 80'
660 _0+50
SCALE: 1" = 40'
660 VERT: 1" = 4' SHEET 6 OF 6
0+00 0+50
1+00
1+50 2+00 2+50
1111 METROPOLITANAVE, SUITE250
CHARLOTTE, NC28204 OXFORD STATION PROJECT LOCATION: DATE: 2/6/2023
www.bgeinc.com OLD MOCKSVILLE ROAD
NC LICENSE #C-4397 STREAM IMPACT - PROFILE VIEW SALISBURY, NC28144
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FORTH E SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY BGE INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO BGE INC.

O
.4-j
co
.E
w
jurisdictional
Determination Information

r'r•
01%
Wetlands and Environmental Planning
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetiands-epg.com

Amber Lipsky <[e-mail]>
SAW-2022-00502 (Old Mocksville Road-Trexler / Salisbury NC / Rowan County)
Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]> Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:54 PM
To: Amber Lipsky <[e-mail]>
Cc: Heath Caldwell <[e-mail]>
Dear Amber,
Reference is made to SAW-2022-00502, please reference this number on any correspondence regarding this action.
On March 1, 2022, we received information from you requesting the Wilmington District, Regulatory Division review and concur with the
boundaries of an aquatic resource delineation.
We have reviewed the information provided by you concerning the aquatic resources, and by copy of this e-mail, are confirming that the aquatic
resources delineation has been verified by the Corps to be a sufficiently accurate and reliable representation of the location and extent of aquatic
resources within the identified review area. The location and extent of these aquatic resources are shown on the delineation map, labeled `Old
Mocksville Road — Trexler Delineation Map' and dated 2/17/2022.
Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 16-01
https://usace.contentdm.ocic.org/utils/getfile/collecfon/pl602lco119/id/1256 provides guidance for Jurisdictional Determinations (JD) and states
"The Corps generally does not issue a JD of any type where no JD has been requested". At this time we are only verifying the delineation. This
delineation may be relied upon for use in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. "This
verification does not address nor include any consideration for geographic jurisdiction on aquatic resources and shall not be interpreted as such.
This delineation verification is not an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) and is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an AJD, which is an appealable action.

If you wish to receive a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD), or an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) please respond
accordingly, otherwise nothing further is required and we will not provide any additional documentation.
[Quoted text hidden]
SAW-2022-00502_Delineation Exhibit.pdf
587K

J Gaj
LEGEND N
�
" 0 Project boundary study limits
/V Stream
© Wetland II
fl Landscape photold4rection
PERENNIAL
STREAM D
-70 LF
NCDEQSTR FORM D WETLAND G
NCDEQ STIR -0.077 AC
FORM A
2
USACE WET FORM G
1
3-4
USACE UPLAND DPI
PERENNIAL STREAM A
-1,345 LF PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
78.87+/- Acres
- USACE VERIFICATION 8/25/22
71 -
0 175 350 700
Feets "
HEPF 3aF, in n tr 4 p Srl t•rs
Prepared for:
OLD MOCKSVILLE RD — TREXLER
Drawn By:
Reviewed By:
FIGURE
Rowan Co., NC
7
MERITAGE HOMES OF
NRN
ALL
DELINEATION MAP
2/17/22
THE CAROLINAS, INC
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification

a-J
L
O
Q
oC
r.
Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: Old Mocksville Road
Rowan County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
Field investigation conducted October 23 & 24, 2021; & November 9, 2022
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. co m
www.wetiands-epg.com
"Mi
Ashesrile Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Old Mocksville Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Old Mocksville Road site (+/- 79.53 acres) is located just west of Old
Mocksville Road, and just south of Spence Drive, in Rowan County, North
Carolina. It can be found on the Salisbury, NC USGS Topographic Quadrangle
Map; latitude is 35.7104 N, longitude is-80.4677 W. The topography is gently to
moderately sloped. The elevation ranges from 680 to 750 ft. The site is a
mosaic of abandoned and successional farmland and disturbed woodlands laced
with dirt roads and trails. There is an overhead utility line right-of-way along Old
Mocksville Road, and a raw water line right-of-way bisecting the site north -south.
Slopes and drainages flow into a southerly flowing tributary to Grant's Creek.
(Figures 1- 4).
Figure 1:
• � r� 5f� yo _ I.
seater O
• ',i PROPERTY BOUNDARY , AV, . p
� 4• 7
U o • STUDY LIMITS
79.53 AC
Ilkc • H?�-�'a_ _ _ _ A ° 1. III /
4�/ R 4.
_ !J
. 17 V// � !r -�---- r �- - 1 � N � `• .lam �
690
Q
/ Boa ! � • • ' I � F'.o° `'� I �� :��
LOCATION CSD� •• • r 1412 liRWKI • •. T �I.
Lat: 35.7104 IN 6ae •�
- GRANTS CREEK _
Long:-80.4677 °W USGS QUAD _� I t zl j,, J.
• . HUC: 03040103 Salisbury, NC SCALE ' -_ ` , 6sp` pf
1 LOWER YADKIN
Prepared for: OLD MOCKSVILLE RD - TREXLER Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE
Rowan Co., NC 1
MERITAGE HOMES OF BLK
THE CAROLINAS, INC USGS MAP
For study pu rp oses on ly -Subject to USACE/NCD EQ Venflcotlon 11108/22
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Mocksville Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 2: VICINITY MAP
� r
� 3
U
H ols hou ser Cycle 5 hop go
Kyle Sales
k ,d �Calvary Baptist Church
3 [9W
i
s Norse &Carriage Freedom
i
n Baptist Cher
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
VVUfO11[e STUDY LIMITS
777A 79.53 AC s/- �
� � "�`��, Chandelle Farms9
Q
� , C
I'm the pappy9
Central piedrnont� A
i - Builders
y 9Century Complete -� `
Greystone village1.
_
Goff 7
COUNTRY
CLUB HILLS
The Tin Man I LLC9
•,,.
North Hiils
Christian School
Van Lathan {
Ill
- Melal Roafing &.
TM
ss
. _Y
4 R
y,na•��'L
5
HpOver'S 20. Hour� �
Tire Services
a 4
Catiques o
�
yy c
q
7
wrcvr v
....... �.�..,,k.�
ALL STAR
IWEPGPrepared For: OLD MOCKSVILLE RO - TREXLER Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE
HERITAGE HOMES OF Rowan Co., NC ELK Z
THE CAROLiNAS, INC VICINITY MAP 11/08/22
For study purposes only - Subjeer ro USRCE/NCDEQ verlflcorlan
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Mocksville Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 3: AERIAL MAP
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Mocksville Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 4: NRCS SOIL MAP
fAvg
N
NRCS Sail Survey Manuscript
I
Rowan County 2004
MWp unit Symbol
Map Un1t Name
,*a
App" "pY b—. 2 to G •.
pe M wop"
CaB2
Carl sandy, day bem. 2 to 9
peraerrl 00m. moderately
Opted
CM
Cna mem Mom, 0 to 2 pa m I
.'Pee_ heaaerray eeeeed
Pad
Peppier Bendy learn, 15 4 25
PKOem alopas
PCB2
Pmmm $W4y dWy'rn. 2 to 8
pr*W SWPN r
eroded
P1.c2
Pr—"eerwy day tern. ate
15 p o m Wtlpaa,
ewdara Wy eroded
Vrwe gray 48y 60MM 2IDS
.: s.
PWW Sloped. mcdWOWY
Melded
TOWN lr Ana of interar
V
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
r y STUDY LIMITS
79.53 AC +/-
- + r?"', � 1! -
W
® era w • ��
a {S.
I
.1
F►�i�
Prepared for: OLD MOCKSVILLE RD - TREKLER Drawn By: Reviewed By: NGURE
MERIT0.GE HOMES OF Rowan Cm, NC Buc q
THE CAROLINAS, INC SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP 11/08/22
For study purposes only - Subject to vsAcF1NcvEQ verrFcamn
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Mocksville Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC website
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7CD545DR5RBFLI IZ755Ywx5RHE/reso
urces was referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered
and Protected species for the Old Mocksville Road site, the results of which are
listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and the
site was investigated on October 23 & 24, 2021; & November 9, 2022.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
the Old Mocksville Road site
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC
**Data search on October 23, 2021 ***Updated November 9. 2022
Group Name
Vascular Schweinitz's sunflower
Plants (Helianthus schweinitzii)
Vertebrate Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis
subflavus
Vertebrate Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Federal Record
Status Status
Endangered Current
Threatened
Protected
Proposed
Endangered
Current
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Mocksville Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
One plant species with federal protection is listed as potentially occurring on the
Old Mocksville Road site:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights -of -way (ROW).
Two animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring on
the Old Mocksville Road site:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of
open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are
suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subf/avus), proposed Endangered, is often
found in caves, abandoned mines, and road culverts during winter. During
the spring, summer, and fall, tricolored bats are found in forested habitats
where they roost in trees. Tricolored bats face extinction due primarily to
the range wide impacts of white -nose syndrome, a deadly disease
affecting cave -dwelling bats across the continent.
RESULTS:
The site is a mosaic of abandoned and successional farmland and disturbed
woodlands laced with dirt roads and trails. There is an overhead utility line right-
of-way along Old Mocksville Road, and a raw water line right-of-way bisecting the
site north -south. Uplands in the southwestern section of the site are dominated
by young cedars and pines. Mixed pines and hardwoods dominate the slopes
and drainages that flow into a southerly flowing tributary to Grant's Creek.
A large portion of the site is abandoned agricultural, and hay fields in a state of
old field succession. There are numerous old fence lines and dirt roads with
patches of scrub/shrub community composed of pine and hardwood saplings and
young trees, and blackberry and woody vine thickets. Dominant species
occurring are Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata), Virginia Pine (Pinus virginiana),
Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Honey
Locust (Gleditsia triacanthhos), Winged Elm, (Ulmus alata), Black Gum (Nyssa
sylvatica), Black Cherry (Prunus serotina), Blackberry (Rubus sp.), Russian Olive
(Elaeagnus umbellate), Winged Sumac (Rhus copallinum), Groundsel (Baccharis
halimifolia), Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Catbrier (Smilax sp.),
and Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
WEPG400996
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Mocksville Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
There are disturbed mixed pine and hardwood dominated slopes mainly in the
northwest and central portions of the site draining to a tributary flowing southward
towards Grants Creek. Tree species include Virginia Pine, Shortleaf Pine,
Sweetgum, Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), White Oak (Quercus alba), Red
Oak (Q. rubra), Southern Red Oak (Q. fa/cata), Willow Oak (Q. phellos),
Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa), Hackberry (Ce/tis /aevigata), American
Elm (U/mus americans), White Ash (Fraxinus americana), and Sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis). Subcanopy species include Flowering Dogwood (Corpus
f/orida), American Holly (Ilex opaca), Fringe Tree (Chionanthus virginicus),
Winged Elm (U/mus a/ata), and Black Cherry (Prunus serotina). Shrubs include
Strawberry Bush (Euonymus americanus), Sacred Bamboo (Nandina sp.),
Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense), and Russian Olive (E/aeagnus angustifolia).
Vines present are Japanese Honeysuckle, Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia), Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), Catbrier and Poison Ivy. Herbs
present are Christmas Fern (Po/ystichum acrostichoides), Ebony Spleenwort
(Asplenium platyneuron), Spotted Wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata and
Japanese Stilt Grass (Microstegium vimineum).
The utility and water line right's -of -way and open disturbed areas and roadsides
are dominated by Fescue (Festuca sp.), along with typical native and invasive
vegetation including Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), Broomsedge
(Andropogon virginicus), Johnson Grass (Sorghum ha/epense), Rabbit Tobacco
(Gnapthalium obtusifolium), Split -beard (A. ternarius), Foxtail (Setaria sp.),
Goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Beggars Ticks (Desmodium sp.), Dog Fennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), Ragweed (Ambrosia sp.), Purple Top (Tripsacum
dactyloides), Wingstem (Verbesina sp.), and Poke Weed (Phytolacca
americans).
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
All potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower along the roadsides, utility
rights -of -way, transitional areas, and woods edges were examined, and
the species was not observed. WEPG concludes Schweinitz's Sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii) does not occur on the site.
No suitable habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles. WEPG concludes
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus /eucocenha/us) does not occur on the site.
• Guidance from the USFWS Asheville office as of the report date indicates
no action is required under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for
the Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subf/avus).
WEPG#00996
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Old Mocksville Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
October 27, 2021
Updated November 9, 2022
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Mocksville Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist/ Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 65,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora).
• Found Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
This discovery led (in part) to the purchase of the site by the State of North
Carolina Plant Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This
population has become a Recovery Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in
Mecklenburg, Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
10
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

a-J
L
O
Q
oC
u
O
V)
oC
c�
Cultural Resources
Report

R.S. Webb & Associates
Cultural Resource Management Consultants
2800 Holly Springs Parkway, Suite 200 • P.O. Drawer 1319
Holly Springs, Georgia 30142
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
February 17, 2023
Mr. Daniel Kuefler
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
Subject: Findings - Limited Cultural Resources Literature Review
Old Mocksville Road Development Tract
Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina
R.S. Webb & Associates No. 22-649-192
Dear Mr. Kuefler:
BACKGROUND
During July 2022, R.S. Webb & Associates conducted a limited cultural resources literature review
for the proposed Old Mocksville Road development tract located in Salisbury, Rowan County, North
Carolina (Figure 1). The project area covers approximately 79.5 acres located west of the
intersections of Old Mocksville Road and Trexler Loop, in the northeastern part of Rowan County.
For this literature review, a cultural resource is defined as a discrete area of human activity that is
at least 50 years old. Cultural resources include, but are not limited to, archeological sites, historic
structures, military earthworks, mines/mining features, historic cemeteries, and historic landscape
features. The purpose of the current study was to determine if previously recorded cultural resources
are located within the project area.
METHODOLOGY
Literature and Records Search: Through the State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) HPOWEB
database, information was reviewed regarding National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
properties and various Rowan County state recognized resources (i.e., surveyed -only resources, local
landmarks, state study -list sites and resources determined by the SHPO to be eligible for the NRHP).
Historic county maps were examined online through North Carolina Maps, a collaboration of the
University of North Carolina, the State Archives of North Carolina, and the Outer Banks History
Center. Historic aerial photography and additional historic maps were accessed through
Historic aerials.com, Earthexplorer.usgs.gov, Legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/, and/or
Alabamamaps.ua. edu.
The following sources were examined to search for historic resources within and adjacent to the
project area:
1891 Official Military Atlas of the Civil War (Davis et al. reprinted, 1983)
1910s Post Office Department, Rural Delivery Routes, Rowan County, North Carolina
1914 USDA Rowan County Sheet Soil Map

Findings - Limited Cultural Resources Literature Search, Old Mocksville Road, Salisbury, North Carolina Page 2
February 17, 2023
• 1938 and 1967 State Highway and Public Works Commission Maps of Rowan County
• 1956, 1965 and 1983 aerial photographs of Rowan County
• 1962 Salisbury, NC 7.5-Minute USGS quadrangle
• 1985-2021 Google Earth aerial photography
RESULTS
National Register of Historic Places: According to the HPOWEB and NPS databases, there are no
NRHP-listed historic properties within 1.0 km of the project area.
Rowan County Historic Resources: The North Carolina HPOWEB database shows three surveyed -
only historic properties within 1.0 km of the study tract (Resource Nos. RW-666, RW-704, and RW-
715), all of which are or were situated within 600 m of the project area (Figure 1). The closest of
these properties to the project area is the Helton -Wiseman House (No. RW-704) located west of Old
Mocksvile Road, approximately 240 m south of the project area.
Historic Cemeteries: Historic maps reviewed show one mapped cemetery within 1.0 km of the
project area (Figure 1). This cemetery is associated with Ardis Chapel AME Zion Church (Resource
No. RW-666) and is located east of Old Mocksville Road, approximately 600 m south of the project
area.
Revolutionary War Features: There were three Revolutionary War military events in Rowan County,
two of which took place on February 4, 1781 at the Yadkin River (5 km and more northeast of the
project area), as both regular armies raced through central North Carolina in route to the Dan River
in Virginia. Listed among the exploits of Loyalist militia captain David Fanning were several
episodes of his capture and eventual escapes from jail, and an ambush of pursuing Patriot militia at
Salisbury, approximately 4 km south of the project area, in July 1778. No casualties were recorded
during this brief affair (Lewis 2021).
Civil War Features: The Civil War military atlas (Davis et al. 1983) indicates that Union infantry
passed no closer than 85 km to the project area; however, Union calvary commanded by George
Stoneman conducted several raids on Confederate supplies and supply lines in the region; an
infamous prisoner -of -war camp and an arsenal at Salisbury provided increased incentive for raiding
in Rowan County. Stoneman with 5,000 troops departed Knoxville, Tennessee on March 21, 1865
and crossed the Yadkin River at Mocksville (north of the study tract) on April 11. Union troops
were delayed for about two hours by unspecified Confederates skirmishing at three crossings of
Grants Creek, including that of Old Mocksville Road, 17 km to the south. Eventually, Confederate
opposition at Grants Creek collapsed and a running skirmish ensued from that point southward into
Salisbury (Brownlee 2018).
Structures on Historic Maps and Aerial Photographs: Maps produced during the first quarter of the
20th century show Old Mocksville Road, but the maps depict no buildings within the study tract. The
1938 county highway map shows increased development along the west side of Old Mocksville
Road, including a dwelling and possibly one outbuilding located in and/or near the eastern part of
the project area (Figure 1). The 1962 USGS quadrangle map and the 1967 county highway map
depict two dwellings in the eastern part of the project area; the northerly one was located north of
an east -west project area access road and two outbuildings were located along its course, west of the

Findings - Limited Cultural Resources Literature Search, Old Mocksville Road, Salisbury, North Carolina Page 3
February 17, 2023
house. A poultry house was added still further west by the time the quad map was photo -revised in
1987. The southerly house was accompanied by one outbuilding at or near the southeastern project
area corner (Figure 1). The 1962 USGS map also shows an "aqueduct" passing north -south through
the east -central part of the project area (Figure 1).
Aerial photographs from 1955 and 1965 show the aqueduct corridor, as many as 10 buildings
associated a farm in the eastern part of the study tract and a separate agricultural property (two
buildings) in the southeastern corner of the study tract. Aerials show cultivated land or pasture
present in the north -central, southwestern and eastern parts of the study tract from 1955 into 1983.
The project area was almost entirely wooded by 2006, at which time nearly all buildings in the east -
central part of the study tract were absent. The 2021 Google Earth aerial photography shows that
the southeastern house and barn were still present, apparently in an advanced state of disrepair or
neglect. Aerials from the middle 20th century forward show the afore -noted aqueduct corridor in
various states of visibility. Between 1998 and 2005, it appears that portions of the corridor,
including within the project area, were cleared, and/or perhaps utilities were installed within it.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
There are no NRHP-listed properties, recorded historic resources, or mapped cemeteries located
within the study tract. The nearest recorded cultural resource is the Helton -Wiseman House (No.
RW-704) west of Old Mocksvile Road, approximately 260 m south-southeast of the study tract. Old
Mocksville Road could have been used by armies/militia during the Revolutionary War and/or the
Civil War, but there is no indication of use of, or engagement in, the project area. Historic maps and
aerial photographs indicate two occupation sites established in the eastern part of the project area
during the middle 20th century. The eastern, northern and western parts were agriculturally active
through the 1980s, but use significantly declined after 1998. Aerials from 2021 show no discernible
standing architecture within the project area. A 20th century aqueduct traverses the project area, but
the feature corridor appears to have been cleared and possibly modified between 1998 and 2005.
CLOSING COMMENTS
Mr. Kuefler, we appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any
questions or comments, please contact me at 770-345-0706.
Sincerely,
R.S. WEBB & ASSOCIATES
(f it"r
Robert S. (Steve) Webb
President and Senior Principal Archeologist
Attachment: Figure 1
REFERENCES
Davis, G.B., L. J. Perry and J. W. Kirkley, compiled by C. D. Cowles
1983 Atlas to Accompany the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.
Reprint of the 1891-1895 edition. The Fairfax Press, New York.

Findings - Limited Cultural Resources Literature Search, Old Mocksville Road, Salisbury, North Carolina Page 4
February 17, 2023
Lewis, J.D.
2022 The American Revolution in North Carolina. Internet -Online. Found at:
http://www.carolana.com/NC/Revolution/. Accessed July 11, 2022.
Brownlee, A.
2018 "Stoneman's Raid: Salisbury and the Yadkin River Bridge". Trading Ford Historic
District Preservation Association. Salisbury, North Carolina. Online Document.
Found at: http://www.trading-ford.org/stoneman.html. Accessed July 11, 2022.

AD
s.
tir _ • �L• t� �' ;� ; r _ _
ReL
Project Area Rw715
; . (Henry.Pinkney.
'so tr a Meeting House,
}. '�Gone)
.Krum.-�-- _ •:
e•• f
I i
♦ Structure on Historic Maps and Aerials
Map Reference: 7.5-Minute USGS Quadrangle
Salisbury, North Carolina (1962, PR 1987)
■ Recorded Historic Resource
Scale
0 610 meters
0 2000 feet
Figure 1 Project Area Location and Recorded Cultural Resources

._f,..,
Pr*Ct`:Are , a� n v r ney !'
AA
• ��. _1 J� 6 4�� -5 l
• ti r - . _ RW704 I
�. ��iHelfon-V4'iseman >
• _ — J—ti House)
., • ,' k I . � • , is ' .
araislChopef
ANTE Zion
CrdE chs ei Church
•• 4. IEZi n `• Cemeter4'— — l
FIELD EVALUATION INDICATES
"AQUEDUCT" IS A BURIED
MUNICIPAL WATERLINE
1&2
3&4
Iff PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
79.53 AC +/-
J. jr.
ri
Prepared for: OXFORD STATION
Rowan Co., NC
MERITAGE HOMES
OF THE CAROLINAS, OFFSITE WATERLINE EVALUATION MAP
For study purposes only - subject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification
Drawn By: I Reviewed By:
ALL I DCK
FIGURE
2/18/23

PHOTO 1 - OPEN WATER FEATURES. NO OUTFALL.
PHOTO 2 - ACROSS STREET FROM PHOTO 1, SIGN STATING `BURIED WATER LINE"
Old Mocksville Road -Aqueduct Evaluation
Yff PG Rowan Co., NC — 8/9/22
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

TM
y
.e` _gig
a
w,-
�y

PHOTO 4 — WATER LINE EASEMENT, FACING SOUTH, SIGN STATING "CAUTION 24" RAW WATER LINE"
*Fence prevented closer photos
WE PG
Old Mocksville Road -Aqueduct Evaluation
Rowan Co., NC — 8/9/22
Wetlands and Enwironmentai Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

42.
0. A
39M�.
r Ohl
ev
•
CAUTION
24 RAW
WATE R
LINE
•
•