20230347 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230302

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? *
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
12/2/2022
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20230347 1
Is a payment required for this project? *
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Wilmington Regional Office - [phone] Holley Snider:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Sparkling Brook Way Property
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
1b. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/2/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Little Northeast Creek
Basin
White Oak
Water Classification
C,NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
34.7629 -77.3046
A. Processing Information
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Onslow
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
N/A
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
li. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Continental Ground, Inc. (Avery Washington, President)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB5574/PG860
2c. Contact Person:
Avery Washington
2d. Address
Street Address
209 Corey Court
Address Line 2
City
Jacksonville
Postal / Zip Code
28546
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
Unknown
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Nikki Thomson
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Jacksonville / White Oak
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
530704920982
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Sparkling Brook Way
Address Line 2
City
Jacksonville
Postal / Zip Code
28546
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Little Northeast Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C,NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
White Oak
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030203020202
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
8.59
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The Site is currently undeveloped and forested. The Site was logged between 2012 and 2016 per historic aerial imagery. The remaining canopy is dominated by pines and weedy
successional species dominate the previously logged areas. Multiple logging roads traverse the Site. The topography of the Site ranges from a low point of +/- 30 feet above mean sea
level (msl) at the northwestern property corner where the drainage exits the Site, to a high point of +/- 38 feet msl in the northern property boundary.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.99
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential development to help meet housing needs in the area.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Roads and lots were positioned to reduce impacts to wetlands on the Site. The road crossing was designed to cross perpendicular to the jurisdictional wetland as much as possible given
connection points and property boundaries. There are 0.99 acres of onsite wetlands of which only 0.253-acre is proposed to be permanently impacted. Construction fencing will be used to
define the construction corridor and prevent accidental additional impacts, while silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from runoff.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes
Comments:
No O Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2023-00342
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
David Gainey
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
6a. Is this a phased project? *
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
N/A
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of Jurisdicition *
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1
Road Crossing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
WA
Yes
Both
0.213
(acres)
1
Lot Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
WA
Yes
Both
0.040
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.253
2i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.253

1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The wetland nearly bisects the entire property; therefore, the proposed road crossing is necessary to access usable upland portions of the Site. The fill
slopes of the road were reduced from 3:1 to 2:1 to reduce overall fill impacts for the road crossing as well as limiting sidewalk to only one side of the
road, rather than both sides (as is the case with the remaining roads in the neighborhood). Roads and residential lots were positioned to reduce impacts
to the wetlands on the Site as practicable. As this is a townhome development, some lot fill was unavoidable to maximize the building pads while still
fitting within the tightened footprint. The road crossings were designed to cross perpendicular to the jurisdictional wetland given connection points and
property boundaries. Approximately +/- 0.99 acres of onsite wetlands of which only 0.253 acres are proposed to be permanently impacted.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent accidental, additional impacts. The Project will be constructed so as to
prevent large areas of land disturbance that could contribute to sediment runoff into the streams and wetlands nearby. Silt fencing will also be used to
mitigate potential stormwater runoff on site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Non -riparian wetland
3c. Comments
Quantity:
0.253
Permanent proposed impacts to wetlands are 0.253-acre. At a 2:1 mitigation ratio, 0.506-ac. of compensatory mitigation credits are required. Please see
attached credit reservation letter.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
The Site is not located within a NC buffered basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
3. Stormwater Requirements
3a. Select whether a completed stormwater management plan (SMP) is included for review and approval or if calculations are provided to document the project will not cause degradation of
downstream surface waters. *
Stormwater Management Plan Antidegradation Calculations
Comments:
There is no locally delegated stormwater management plan review authority for this project; therefore, the stormwater management plan will be submitted to the DEMLR-Wilmington
Regional office for review and approval.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation

la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Per the NC DWQ April 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale residential development projects have a "low potential for cumulative
impact" since the project already in a developed landscape (i.e. existing residences and development in the vicinity) and the area already contains the
necessary infrastructure (i.e. sewer, water, electricity, etc.). The project drains to Little Northeast Creek, which is Class C; Nutrient Sensitive Waters
(NSW), (i.e. not HQW or ORW). We anticipate the NCDWR will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
The Site will connect to existing sanitary sewer lines; the municipality will ensure capacity will not be exceeded.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? *
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? *
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A review of the NC Natural Heritage Program dated January 22, 2023, lists no federally listed T&E species on or within 1.0-mile of the Site. Additionally,
the USFWS Ipac Report, dated January 22, 2023, did not document T&E species on the Site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
The proposed project is in Onslow County which is one of the twenty coastal counties; however, the site is not near coastal or tidal habitat which would
support EFH (i.e., salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
The site is not listed as a historic property or within an historic district. Two historic sites are located within one -mile of the Site.

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA-FIRM Floodplain Maps Database - FIRM Panel No.: 3720530700K effective on 06/19/2020.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Sparkling Brook Way Application Supplemental Documents.pdf 6.1MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature O
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Nicole J Thomson
Signature
A
Date
3/2/2023

ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST., 2016
March 2, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Ms. Katherine Elks
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Sparkling Brook Way Property
Request for NWP 29 and GC 4256 Authorization
SAW-2022-00342
Sage Project #2021.147
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. John Perry
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.,
Wilmington, NC 28405
On behalf of Continental Ground, Inc (owner) and Strongrock Engineering Group, LLC (applicant), please find
attached a complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE) that the activities associated with the proposed development of the Sparkling Brook
Way (Project) may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 and GC 4256.
Project Purpose and Location
The Project includes the construction of a residential subdivision to meet housing needs in the area. The Site is
+/- 8.59-acres and is located on Sparkling Brook Way in Jacksonville, Onslow County, NC. The coordinates of
34.7629°N, 77.3046°W generally correspond to the center of the Site.
Project Detail
The proposed Project consists of the construction of a residential development with a single subdivision road and
other utilities.
Access to the Site will be provided via Sparkling Brook Way. Heavy equipment typically used for road crossing
projects (e.g., backhoes, bulldozers, etc.) will be utilized.
No federally threatened or endangered species are listed to occur on the Site according to the NC Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) Database. (See attached report dated January 22, 2023).
The Site itself is not listed as a historic property or within a historic district. Two historic properties are listed within
1.0 mile of the Site; however, the construction of the Project should have no impact on these.
Project History
The Site is approximately 8.59 acres and is currently undeveloped and forested. The Site was logged between
2012 and 2016 per historic aerial imagery. The remaining canopy is dominated by pines and weedy successional
species dominate the previously logged areas. Multiple logging roads traverse the Site. The topography of the
Site ranges from a low point of +/- 30 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the northwestern property corner where
the drainage exits the Site, to a high point of +/- 38 feet msl in the northern property boundary.
Avoidance and Minimization
The Site contains an approximately 0.99-acre wetland, which nearly bisects the entire property. The road crossing
was designed to cross perpendicular to the jurisdictional wetland as much as possible given connection points
and property boundaries. Of the 0.99 acre of onsite wetland, only 0.253 acre is proposed to be permanently
impacted/filled. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent accidental
additional impacts, while silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from runoff. The proposed
wetland crossing impact is aligned to cross the wetland as perpendicularly as possible in an effort to reduce
Sparkling Brook Way Property Page 1 of 2

impacts. Impacts to wetlands have been further minimized by steepening side slopes to 2:1 and limiting the
sidewalk to one side of the proposed spine road. Lots were positioned to avoid additional fill in wetlands as was
practicable. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental
additional impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from stormwater runoff. General
techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental
additional impacts. Silt fencing and sediment basins will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream
and wetland areas.
Project Impacts
Impact 1 is a proposed road crossing and a minor amount lot fill on wetland WA in the central portion of the Site.
The resulting wetland impact of the road crossing and lot fill will total 0.253 acres. No other impacts to wetlands
are proposed and there are no other surface waters on the Site.
Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is required for this project because permanent wetland impacts total 0.253 acre.
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank will supply the non -riparian wetland mitigation credits for the proposed
permanent wetland impacts. A credit reservation letter is included in this application package.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Respectfully submitted:
C12047
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 — USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — Wetland Sketch Map
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
Tax Maps and Parcel Information
NCNHP Database Report
USFWS Ipac Report
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank Credit Reservation Letter
USACE PJD email (AID SAW-2023-00342)
Impact Maps
NCDWR 30-day Prefiling Notice
Nicole Thomson, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Sparkling Brook Way Property Page 2 of 2

Sean Clark
From: Sean Clark
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2022 1:17 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Kim Hamlin ([e-mail]); Nikki Thomson
Subject: Pre -Filing Notification for Sparkling Brook Way Property (Towns on Avery) Residential Development
in Onslow County (Sage #2021.147)
To whom it may concern,
This email serves as notice of our intent to file a Pre -construction Notification (PCN) application for the above -named
project located in Jacksonville, Onslow County, NC.
Thank you,
Sean Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Cell: 919-559-1537
[e-mail]
i

Map Location
USGS Topographic Map
Sparkling Brook Way Property
Sage Project # 2021.147
Jacksonville, NC Quadrangle
2019 USGS Topography
December 2, 2021
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Figure 1
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
ES F. 2056
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

Map Location
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Sparkling Brook Way Project
Sage Project # 2021.147
Onslow County Soil Survey, 1992
Sheet 25
December 2, 2021
0 850 1,700
Feet
Figure 2
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
ES F. 2056
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

z/
/
I
yap
NOTE: Location, shape and size of
depicted features on the evaluated
site are approximate and should be
surveyed by a licensed NC
./r
^WA01 TT PL
/
/ _
'1 co/ //
J. / / % -ifil r
/ /
i
WA31 TT PL
Legend
/
Project Study Area
Wetlands - Jurisdictional Waters of the US
r I/ 1 i h .1".. \_ \ V \\ h
.. . .
1 i •\ `\
r i 1 : _ -. �. 7A \.
II
1 1 f i / '4N \ \•\•\y\ ^--
• J l —• \ 1
t h I1 1 1 ./// ! / e 1 4 1 i
1 j 1 -./ ! / \ 1 1
I I 11 11 i; i ----. 11 i i
\ 1' 1 1 ; I- ��Ii "I; 1.1 1
•1. \\ 1•!
\
i
\ 1
/
11
\ 1 ti, \\
ti
1 M
L_..'"
All Features must be confirmed by
the USACE.
C
N
v /C
,rsi r
y
L
1 - •\ r� r ■ j •\ ::-'
••-- ram' �• I 1
4/ I
1 1 `
• 1 1 11 /
/ r /' . •, 1- 1 /+ 1 /
~11 1 1 / I t% 1 L^-- . l
/ 1 / 1 \ / / i 1 ` .\
%
...1 .- .Y_.. 1 . r_/ / 1• - •
1
/
!
c
$p
• lk.k
•
Wetland WA
NC One
l 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 \ \ \
1 i • 1 1\ \ \r . \
r 1 `; 111 r \ 7''1 .
r1 i I 11 f! / *\,
1 1
Apg gI1I11tg-7 iltcQl.r126641VAID OQee
-ation and AnalysisoNC 911 Board
Map Location
Wetland Sketch Map
Sparkling Brook Way Project
Sage Project # 2021.147
December 7, 2021
0 75 150
Feet
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
ESr. tote
Figure 3
Drawn By:
David Gainey
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

e Ct
NCSHPO Data Download: 1/3/2022
http://www.ncdcr.gov
pinewood 6r
Country Rd
¢� *es Far
�,
da �43
qt
dP
ry7c
R tO', or
Q.
9t
a,s
e`¢<'` Walnrrr ereex rya
House -
ON 0267
So,,: r
snerherd Ru
N
Q Project Study Area
Q 1-Mile Project Buffer
NCSHPO Status
Surveyed Only
• Surveyed, Gone
ca ct
a
Efk cr 6-
. ~ Pearson D*
. 5.on cn
Old 36 Rd
Rn
'tl'r(�m8 A
o.,r, trr
y
a°�ker ti �
Bubblrnp 9rook Cn
RorkY Run Rd
Hooi 001 i n
Erasmus Morton
House - ON0386
,'a 36.Rd
Map Location
Lenoir
Duplin
Jones
Onslow
Craven --
Carteret
NCSHPO Map
Sparkling Brook Way Property
Sage Project # 2021.147
Prepared by: K. Hamlin
January 3, 2021
Figure 4
Pender
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
CeII: 919-559-1537

Parcel ID
075579
Owner Name
CONTINENTAL GROUND INC
Sparkling Brook Way Property (SAGE# 2021.147)
Onslow County Tax Map and Parcel Information
Map Number
1127-1-14
Owner Mailing Address
209 COREY CT
JACKSONVILLE NC 28546-7705
General Information
Acres
Physical Address
8.59
SPARKLING BROOK WAY
Neighborhood Code 591
Plat Book & Page 80-206
Township WHITE OAK
Building Value $0.00
Assessed Value $46,390.00
Heated Square Feet
Number of Bedrooms
Last Sale
Date
21-SEP-21
Price
$01,000.00
Properly Description
Subdivision
8.59A TR ON SPARKLING
BROOK WAY
TRACT ON SPARKLING BROOK
WAY
City Limit UNINCORPORATED ONSLOW
NC PIN 530704920932
Improvement Code V
Land Value $46,390.00
Total Taxed Value $46,390.00
Year Built
Book
5574
Page
860
Onslow County
Geographical Information
Services-GIS
234 NW Corridor Blvd.
Jacksonville, NC 28540
WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
This map is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction, and is
compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are
hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted
for verification of the information contained an this map. The County and mapping company
assume no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map.

• ■■■
■■ • NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ ■•■E NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■■■
January 22, 2023
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Sparkling Brook Way; 2021.147
Dear Kim Hamlin:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-20599
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 'M9.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Sparkling Brook Way
Project No. 2021.147
January 22, 2023
NCNHDE-20599
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID cientific Name Common Name Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank + =
Vascular Plant 15998 Peltandra sagittifolia Spoonflower 1938-06 H 5-Very Significantly G3G4 S2S3
Low Rare
Peripheral
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
wner
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation
Owner Type
State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on January 22, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q3, October 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

January 22, 2023
Managed Area (MAREA)
n Buffered Project Boundary
n Project Boundary
NCNHDE-20599: Sparkling Brook Way
Sources. Esri, Airbus DS. USGS. NGA. NASA, CGIAR. N Robinson. NOEAS.
NLS. OS, NMA. Geodatastyrelse , Rijkswaterstaat GSA, Geoland FEMA,
Intermap and the GIS user community
Sources. Esri, HERE. Garmin. FAO. NOAA, USGS. © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User Community
Page 3 of 3

1/22/23, 10:48 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust
resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area
referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly
or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on
trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude
and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the
defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities,
and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Onslow County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
iB (919) 856-455
C1(
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Bo 3372�
Raleigh, NC 27 6-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
,c\O
\),A
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/ISGSOKIABZDFBGJC3V5KVWQEXM/resources 1/8

1/22/23, 10:48 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI)
for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by
activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the
species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species,
additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which
is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be
obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local
field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an offici species list by
doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
#c‘)b#C\
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Login (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species" and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Servic'Program t .S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA sheries2).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NO Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries
for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threato r endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or
proposed, for listing. See the fisting sta page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries also known as the National Ma ne Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northerr�.ong-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
Wherver found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Birds
Endangered
Proposed Endangered
NAME STATUS
Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477
Threatened
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/ISGSOKIABZDFBGJC3V5KVWQEXM/resources 2/8

1/22/23, 10:48 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this specie
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/14
o�
o
cationCnot overlap the critical habitat.
Threatened
Threatened
Endangered
STATUS
SAT
The
$0\
Endangered
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.go ecp/species/1110
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
Endangered
Threatened
STATUS
Candidate
NAME STATUS
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
Pondberry Lindera melissifolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279
Endangered
Endangered
dc\O
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/ISGSOKIABZDFBGJC3V5KVWQEXM/resources 3/8

1/22/23, 10:48 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Critical habitats
Endangered
Threatened
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act?.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migra irds, eagles, and their habitats
should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservatioameasu s, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/mi rat ry-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to ds ttps:// .fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-
ta ke-m ig rato ry-bird s
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https:.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)
list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ %low. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this
list will be found in your projec area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit tke E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects
that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird
list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds
on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of
the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs)
in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Mar 1 to Jul 15
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/ISG5OKIABZDFBGJC3V5KVWQEXM/resources 4/8

1/22/23, 10:48 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This
information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read
and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this
report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a par cuTar
week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. he
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One cep have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the dfieek where the species was detected
divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability
of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in
week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that tJ probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the
year. The relative probability of presence on week 2 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the pxevious step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall
between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability ofse l- a scor?, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( ) t
Yellow bars denote a very libel estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow
bars show r a bird, Voes not breed in your project area.
S
Ve k lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the
10k rid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas
off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more
sparse.
SPECIES
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable
Brown -headed Nuthatch
BCC - BCR
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide (CON)
[JAR
I-F-I -I -
APR
MAY
• probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
JUN JUL AUG
IIII 1111 ;Li II11 +1--
---I- !III -1-- IIM- 11--
SEP OCT NON DEC
---1 -11- -1-1
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/ISG5OKIABZDFBGJC3V5KVWQEXM/resources 5/8

1/22/23, 10:48 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prothonotary Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Red-headed Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide (CON)
-
-+1+ '+�-
+—+— —+—+ -'++ —"—
!II
III Jim
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of
these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be
breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of
activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your
project location.
114
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing
collection of survey banding and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle
(Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
J
11?-
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur
in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information ocator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Alan Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is
derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information beco es available. To learn more about how the probability of
presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Prob iIity$f Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating i my are
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls w in (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location
using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds n your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some
point within the timeframe specific . If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
migratory birds?
What are the levelso9f co▪ nc▪ ern f
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii,
*the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Noon -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles)
or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds
on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off
the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be
helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project
webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey
data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/ISG5OKIABZDFBGJC3V5KVWQEXM/resources 6/8

1/22/23, 10:48 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is
generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)
that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then
the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore,
a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential
to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to
look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your
project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibilit
conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
0&\°'
1 � 1
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other
State/Federal statutes..
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
This location did not intersect any wetlands mapped by NWI.
NOTEThis initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional information on
the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these
resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography.
A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral
data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon
boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to
detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/ISG5OKIABZDFBGJC3V5KVWQEXM/resources 7/8

1/22/23, 10:48 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats,
because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this
inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving
modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency
regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
S\O�
i\o" s?: °CI"
,� FOB
�O
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/ISG5OKIABZDFBGJC3V5KVWQEXM/resources 8/8

BACHELORS DELIGHT MITIGATION BANK
CREDIT RESERVATION LETTER
March 1, 2023
TO: Continental Ground, Inc.
Attn. Avery Washington
209 Corey Street
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Project: Sparkling Brook Way (Onslow County, NC)
Dear Mr. Washington:
FROM: Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
c/o Davey Resource Group
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
Pursuant to the recent credit request submitted on your behalf by Sage Ecological Services, Bachelors
Delight Mitigation Bank (BDMB) is providing confirmation of acceptance to supply non -riparian wetland
mitigation credits for proposed wetland impacts associated with the Sparkling Brook Way Project located in
Onslow County, North Carolina. This acceptance is conditional upon receipt of payment as outlined below.
Please refer to the table below depicting the type and quantity of credits requested and reserved for your
project.
Mitigation Type Credits Reserved Fee Per Unit
Stream I 0 I- $646.12 $0.00
rNon-Riparian Wetland i 0.51 F $99,476.51 F $50,733.02
1 Riparian Wetland I 0.00 I- $99,476.51 I- $0.00
Total Fee I— $50,733.02
Fee
Based upon receipt of the project credit request transmitted on February 28, 2023, BDMB will reserve 0.51
Non -Riparian Wetland credits for a period of up to 90 days from the date of this letter. Note that requests
to reserve credits beyond 90 days will require a deposit. Please contact us if you need a reservation to
extend beyond the 90-day period.
Upon request for receipt of credit transfer, BDMB will issue an invoice in the amount of $50,733.02.
Upon receipt of payment, BDMB will provide an executed Transfer of Credit Certificate. Note that all
payments must be made with certified funds. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the credit
types and amounts requested are consistent with the compensatory mitigation requirements of the
permit(s) issued. BDMB and/or its agents are not responsible for determining the applicant's mitigation
requirements. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at
[phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
6111
Christian Preziosi
Davey Resource Group (Agent)

From: WilmingtonNCREG
To: Cory Darnell
Cc: Elks, Katharine B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject: RE: USACE PJD Package - Sparkling Brook Way - SAGE#: 2021.147 - 02-06-23
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 8:19:09 AM
Hi Cory,
Your request was received and assigned action ID: SAW-2023-00342.
Ms. Katharine Elks will do further processing.
Thank you,
June
From: Cory Darnell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 4:52 PM
To: WilmingtonNCREG <[e-mail]>
Cc: Norma Hernandez -Cruz <[e-mail]>; Nikki Thomson
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] USACE PJD Package - Sparkling Brook Way - SAGE#: 2021.147 - 02-06-23
To whom it concerns -
I am requesting a PJD for the above mentioned site. The site is located in Jacksonville, Onslow
County, NC. I've attached the PJD package and supporting documents to this email. Let me know
which regulator will be covering this project so I can coordinate with them.
Thanks,
Cory Darnell, PWS
SAGE Ecological Services, Inc.
336-749-0226
CdarnelI(sageecological.com

PROGRESS PLOT DATE: 03/2/2023
SITE INFORMATION:
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
PARENT PIN:
DB/PG:
ZONING:
ACREAGE:
LAND CLASS:
SPARKLING BROOK WAY
ONSLOW
075579
BD 5574, PG 860
R-5
365,833 SF (8.40 AC)
RESIDENTIAL
MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS:
SETBACKS SHALL BE OBSERVED ALONG THE EXTERIOR PROPERTY LINES OF THE OVERALL
DEVELOPMENT.
FRONT SETBACK:
SIDE SETBACK:
REAR SETBACK:
20'
5'
15'
RIGHT OF WAY & OTHER AREAS:
NATURAL WETLANDS: 43,398 SF (1.00 AC)
LOT ACREAGE:
TOTAL NUMBER PROPOSED LOTS:
MAXIMUM ALLOWED DENSITY:
PROPOSED DENSITY:
MINIMUM ALLOWED LOT SIZE:
MINIMUM PROPOSED LOT SIZE:
MAXIMUM PROPOSED LOT SIZE:
AVERAGE PROPOSED LOT SIZE:
MINIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT WIDTH:
MINIMUM PROPOSED LOT WIDTH:
IMPERVIOUS AREAS:
ROADWAYS / PARKING:
SIDEWALKS:
LOTS (1,400 SF/LOT):
TOTAL ON -SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA:
TOTAL ON -SITE IMPERVIOUS PERCENT:
OPEN SPACE:
OPEN SPACE AREA:
75
20 DU/AC
8.93 DU/AC
1,700 SF
1,700 SF
2,800 SF (LOT 6)
1,749 SF
20'
20'
43,644 SF (1.00 AC)
13,310 SF (0.31 AC)
105,000 SF (2.41 AC)
161,954 SF (3.72 AC)
44.27%
146,320 SF (3.36 AC)
UTILITY DEMANDS:
SEWAGE USAGE:
WATER USAGE:
STREET TYPE SUMMARY:
60' ROW SECTION:
36,000 GPD
4 BED X 120 GPD/BED X 75 UNITS
36,000 GPD
4 BED X 120 GPD/BED X 75 UNITS
1,350 LF
EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT/FORESTED
PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL - (MULTI-FAMILY/TOWNHOMES)
VICINITY MAP
1" = 500'
OWNER:
CONTINENTAL GROUND INC.
209 COREY CT.
JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546
DEVELOPER:
AVERY WASHINGTON
[e-mail]
910-787-0877
FIRE DISTRICT/ISO:
PINEY GREEN VFD/5
CIVIL ENGINEERING:
STRONG ROCK ENGINEERING GROUP, PLLC
PO BOX 55992
RALEIGH, NC 27624
COMPANY LICENSE #: P-2166
984.200.1932 (0)
[e-mail]
SURVEYOR:
STRONG ROCK SURVEYING + GEOMATICS
1600 OLIVE CHAPEL RD., SUITE 140 APEX,
NC 27502
919-801-1104 (0)
CONTACT: JEREMY TAYLOR, PLS
[e-mail]
ENVIRONMENTAL:
SAGE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES
3707 SWIFT DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, 27606
919-559-1537
CONTACT: SEAN CLARK
[e-mail]
SHEET INDEX
01
E-1
COVER SHEET
02
E-2
OVERALL IMPACT MAP
03
E-3
IMPACT AREA
STRONGRCK
ENGINEERING GROUP
STRONG ROCK ENGINEERING GROUP, PLLC COMPANY LICENSE # P-2166
6801 FALLS OF NEUSE RD. SUITE 108 RALEIGH, NC 27615
[e-mail]
SPARKLING BROOK WAY
JACKSONVILLE, ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
COVER SHEET
E-1
01 OF 03
REVISION :
SCALE:
HORZ 1 "=500'

PROGRESS PLOT DATE: 03/2/2023
LEGEND:
O /-
LOT 34\
\J
J
f
N
1 Q
SILT FENCE/ LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
N
PROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.) '
itzi•PiEll Zif& v \
/\�hi !L.
�r�����—o
iif
iip � I �r-'�f�L�1� � �
iNiref®i'' : iiiiif rriiiii ftWii iiiii
I
2
co
I
\\\
K TONE WAY
VVTLD
VVTLD
EX. MAJOR CONTOURS
EX. MINOR CONTOURS
PROP. MAJOR CONTOURS
PROP. MINOR CONTOURS
EXISTING ADJOINER PROPERTY LINE
ROADWAY CENTER LINE
PROPOSED LOT LINE
EXISTING WETLAND
ROADWAY IMPACT
LOT IMPACT
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE
,50
PERMANENT IMPACT
AREA (SF)
LOT IMPACT (SF)
1,739 SF
ROAD WAY (SF)
9,285 SF
TOTAL PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT (SF)
11,024 SF
0
M
GRAPHIC SCALE
100
300
600
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 150 ft.
STRONGRCK
ENGINEERING GROUP
STRONG ROCK ENGINEERING GROUP, PLLC COMPANY LICENSE # P-2166
6801 FALLS OF NEUSE RD. SUITE 108 RALEIGH, NC 27615
[e-mail]
SPARKLING BROOK WAY
JACKSONVILLE, ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
OVERALL IMPACT MAP
E-2
02 OF 03
REVISION :
SCALE:
HORZ 1 "=150'

PROGRESS PLOT DATE: 03/2/2023
AV OA,
O
WA WETLAND--
,[42-
V4
rN r
\J
F--J
N
n N I
SILT FENCE/ LIMITS OF
1 DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
1(70
L J
17+00
ROADWAY IMPACT
AREA (9,285 SF)
/ \
o b/ P a' ctr
4
/
I�
(72 (96-
4-
15+00
/-
N -" -' /1 LOT IMPACT / ✓ i/ _ _ AREA (1,739 SF)
i
PLAN VIEW - IMPACT AREA
HORIZONTIAL: 1" = 50'
,/✓ �� . =_
J
(9;-
60
0 20
GRAPHIC SCALE
00
,00 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 fl
LEGEND:
F'
L
EX. MAJOR CONTOURS
EX. MINOR CONTOURS
PROP. MAJOR CONTOURS
PROP. MINOR CONTOURS
EXISTING ADJOINER PROPERTY LINE
ROADWAY CENTER LINE
PROPOSED LOT LINE
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE
EXISTING WETLAND
ROADWAY IMPACT
LOT IMPACT
PERMANENT IMPACT
AREA (SF)
LOT IMPACT (SF)
1,739 SF
ROAD WAY (SF)
9,285 SF
TOTAL PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT (SF)
11,024 SF
STRONGRCK
ENGINEERING GROUP
STRONG ROCK ENGINEERING GROUP, PLLC COMPANY LICENSE # P-2166
6801 FALLS OF NEUSE RD. SUITE 108 RALEIGH, NC 27615
[e-mail]
SPARKLING BROOK WAY
JACKSONVILLE, ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT AREA
E-3
03 OF 03
REVISION :
SCALE:
HORZ 1 "=50'

Sean Clark
From: Sean Clark
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2022 1:17 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Kim Hamlin ([e-mail]); Nikki Thomson
Subject: Pre -Filing Notification for Sparkling Brook Way Property (Towns on Avery) Residential Development
in Onslow County (Sage #2021.147)
To whom it may concern,
This email serves as notice of our intent to file a Pre -construction Notification (PCN) application for the above -named
project located in Jacksonville, Onslow County, NC.
Thank you,
Sean Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Cell: 919-559-1537
[e-mail]
i