20230346 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230302

I I
1• 111
DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? *
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
9/21/2022
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20230346 1
Is a payment required for this project? *
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY Oak Meadow SD
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Krissina Newcomb
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
1b. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/2/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Buies Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS-IV
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.467861
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-78.743256
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
WFZ-FT LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
04164:2983 and 04164:2986
2c. Contact Person:
C. Greg Bagley
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
2d. Address
Street Address
113 Duncansby Ct.
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Cary NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27511 USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
C. Greg Bagley
3b. Business Name:
WFZ-FT LLC
3c. Address
Street Address
113 Duncansby Ct.
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Cary NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27511 USA
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Krissina Newcomb
4b. Business Name:
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
PO Box 400
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Lillington NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27546 USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone] [phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History O
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
Of appropriate)
Oak Meadow
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Angier
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0672-65-0333 and 0672-65-8259
2b. Property size:
22

2c. Project Address
Street Address
2783 Old Buies Creek Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Angier NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27501 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Buies Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-IV
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040503
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is currently used as agricultural farmland with a wetland drainageway and a pond in the western half of the site. The wetland area below the pond is wooded. Land use in the
vicinity is agricultural and light residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
Construct a single-family residential subdivision connected by a road and utilities (26 Lots)
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
A 26 lot subdivision will be constructed. The subdivision road, Oak Meadow Drive, will cross wetland "B" above the pond (impact W1). A 46ft long, 24" RCP @ 1.5% slope will be installed
under the roadway. The water utility line will be concurrently installed in the road right-of-way. The area will be back filled, the roadway paved, and side slopes stabilized.
Typical construction equipment such as excavators, loaders, dump trucks, and graders will be utilized.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? *
Tyler Dye and Steven Boor
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
Yes No
O Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No future phases are planned. No wetland impacts are anticipated beyond those in this application.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory

1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of Jurisdicition *
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
road crossing
P
Headwater Forest
B
Yes
Both
0.069
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.069
2i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.069
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Lots were configured to exclude all waters and wetlands.
The road was sited to cross the wetland perpendicularly and at its narrowest point to minimize impacts.
Shoulder slopes at the road crossing will be 3:1.
Utilities (electric, communications, water, etc.) will be grouped in the road right-of-way to minimize impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be used, such as silt fencing, to protect water quality. Construction limits will be clearly marked through
wetlands. No clearing will occur in wetlands outside of the proposed impact area. Construction and fill materials will be stored in upland areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent wetland impacts will be less than 1/10 acre. Proposed impacts are below the threshold for mandatory compensatory mitigation and would result in minimal adverse effects on
the aquatic environment.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030004) is not subject
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No

2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This residential development is relatively small and will not likely affect regional growth patterns.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Onsite subsurface sewage waste disposal, each system designed to treat and dispose of 360 to 480 gallons of effluent per day.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? *
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? *
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US FWS iPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ ). NC Natural Heritage Program (https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
NC State Historic Preservation Office (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)
An "Outbuilding" (Site ID: HT0384) is mapped on an adjacent parcel to the north of the subject site. The
NC Historic Preservation Office GIS (HPOWEB) lists this feature as "surveyed only" in 2002-2003, and it is not currently listed in the National Register,
Study List, Determined Eligible, or Local Landmarks and Districts.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)

8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? *
NC Flood Risk Information System (https://fris.nc.gov/fris/ )
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Oak Meadow Subdivision_PCN Attachments.pdf 13.44MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Krissina Newcomb
Signature
4104 f tt4k6
Date
3/2/2023

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, Lillington NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
27 February 2023
Ms. Katharine Elks
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification for
Oak Meadow SD (Proposed)
Harnett County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Elks,
A Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted for the above referenced
property. The subject site contains two parcels totaling 22 acres and is located on the western
side of Old Buies Creek Road, Angier, NC. The subject site is located in the Buies Creek
Subwatershed (HUC 03030004-0503) in the Cape Fear River Basin. A wetland delineation was
conducted for the 22-acre site by Hal Owen & Associates Inc. staff in June 2022.
The proposed development is for a 26 lot single family residential subdivision named
Oak Meadow Subdivision. The plan proposes a single road crossing that will result in 0.069 acre
of permanent wetland impact. This pre -construction notification is being submitted pursuant to
USACE Nationwide Permit 29 and NCDWR Water Quality General Certification 4256.
Attachments include:
• Appendix A: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package
• Appendix B: Site Plans and Impact Maps
• Appendix C: Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat
• Appendix D: State Historic Preservation Office Map
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist
CC: Greg Bagley
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PACKAGE
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 2783 Old Buies Creek Road
City, State: Angier, NC
County: Harnett
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0672-65-0333 and 0672-65-8259
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Krissina Newcomb, Hal Owen & Assoc
Mailing Address: PO Box 400
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
o
❑
EI
o
Lillington, NC 27546
910-893-8743
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: WFZ-FT LLC
Mailing Address: 113 Duncansby Court
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Cary, NC 27511
919-552-5826
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Krissina Newcobmb
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner fl Authorized Agent'
12/15/22
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 22 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
z
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.467861
Longitude: -78.743256
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Project Name:
Oak Meadow SD
Address:
2783 Old Buies Creek Road, Angier
PIN:
0672-65-0333 & 0672-65-8259
County:
Harnett
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name:
WFZ-FT LLC
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
113 Duncansby Court
Cary, NC 27511
919-522-5826
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property
identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the
property.
I hereby authorize Mrs. Krissina Newcomb of Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
jurisdictional determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and certifications, and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
This authorization will remain in effect for (5) five years unless revoked by the
undersigned in writing.
i
Authorized Signatur
(Please legibly print name
Gr/l1"P«
Title Date

m
w
O
Parcel ID: 04-0673-
SPLIT FROM ID
0
N
N
Z
O
U
ogU
a)
a
II
O F
Q
m
0
L0
co N
N 0 Q
0
O' OZ
zo
D
a
0
W
O
0
g
CO
CO
0
CREDENCE TO
W
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD
Z
>Q
1 1 W
rre
Z
0
U
O
o =
LU 0 uJ
LU 0
> �� U
Y Q J J
w
Oaz
J 01 0
(j> p N
Z0H u
0
0
V
U
Z N N
• O N
((J N 0
7 C
Z CO 0
• >Th
2 '-f,o
u LLU N 0
J 0 0
U up N
U) m
U. w Ln gi
1 m -O c In }
N
To 172
I"0 20 > la
O N CC <
MODEL DESCRIPTION
cO
O
O
USE DESCRIPTION
W
7
00
c0 co
ENEN
EN EN
1-
Z
D
0
U
BASE RATE I
DESCRIPTION
W
G
0
CATEGORY
00
0 0
CO CO
EN EN
as
Va
W W
H
00
NB FACTOR
DEPRECIATION
z
O
z
000
CO
Z W
gaCO
W a a
7
J 0 �
>CO7
W
C
W
W W LO
a>
000
N
LU
a
0
Z
0
V
ROUT: WTRSHD:
W
I-
aa
In
ZJ
a
m
0
0
W
>
>
d
0
w
X
0 0 0 0 0
71- 71-
J LL1
J > J
>wJ�>D
(jDDJ J D 0 J
0 » Z >
XD w wQ
D
Ogo0H
CW
W r 0
ce
N
N
0
W
0,
0
c0
m
0
0
CO
0
CO
W
0
m
rn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
rn
CO
0
HEATED AREA
BOUGHT LD IN 88
cc
O
ax
W u
0
m
>-
W
1„1
Z
Da
m
F
1
1-
DESCRIPTION
W
0
U
z
0
Z
C7
LAND INFORMATION
LAND NOTES
LAND VALUE
m
N
c0
CV
ce
( .
a▪ z
0
0
0
0
0
m
m
0
ath
o▪ �
�a
0
0
�a
Zr
7
Q
N
az
0
0
0
N
ZW
a'
0
0
m
0
0
m
0
0
0 W
a
ce
W0
00
zo
OJ
a0
COa
W LL
H
0
zo
Za
Du.
V
0
0
N
0
0
N
0
0
N
00
z0
J
= W
H N
aIA
0
2
a
0
FRONTAGE
Z
Vz
00
JN
0
Q
0
Q
W
W 0
'�0
.m
.m
0,
rn
0
O
0
Z
Lu
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
12/15/2022 4:28:57 PM.
0
0 ,0
0 0
m�
0
O z
MCV�
CO N Q
U
OO
z
1 O
1 0
m
rs
%,o
O
N
N
1
RI

r1
CO
0
0
Parcel ID: 04-0672-
SPLIT FROM ID
CD
0
W
O
0
g
0
CREDENCE TO
W
J
>-
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD
O^ (i)
o z
o
cC0W0
Lu (D z
>LH, " Q a
Q U
U
w U (!)
w O U S
Q Q I_
z0CDQ
QQ��
U
CO
0
U o
z N N
• 0 N
(JJ N 0
(7
z N o
• } Th
MODEL DESCRIPTION
O
O
O
USE DESCRIPTION
W
00
I'I'
m m
00
1-
Z
0
U
BASE RATE I
DESCRIPTION
W
G
0
CATEGORY
00
LDLD
u
CO' CO'
c0 CO
NB FACTOR
DEPRECIATION
z
O
z
000
CO.
CO
N
LU
a
0
Z
0
V
ROUT: WTRSHD:
W
I—
aa
ZJ
a
m
0
N
m
>
>
0
0
>-
w
0 0 0 0 0
m m
V V
w
J > J
7 J J DD0 0 J
Z > > Z -
�XD w wQ
CO O_IaaH
CW
W o. 0
N
N
0
0
W
0,
0
co
m
0
0
V
W
0
a
CO
N
0
0
0
0
LO
0
0
N
0
HEATED AREA
cc
O
O.
W u
0
m
>-
W
1„1
Z p�
Da
m
F
1
1-
F
Z
0
U
DESCRIPTION
W
0
U
z
0
z
C7
LAND INFORMATION
LAND NOTES
LAND VALUE
m
CO
m
CO
CV
(( a
a▪ z
0
0
a^
o▪ �
�a
0,
�a
Zr
7
Q
N
az
0
N
N
ZW
▪ a
Z
5
0
0
0
N
Q W
a
o
W0
00
z0
OJ
a0
a
LL 0
-05 +00 +00 +00 +00
zo
za
0 IL
V
0
0
0,
o�
J
= W
H N
• ,„
2
a
0
FRONTAGE
.mi
-02
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
12/15/2022 4:26:32 PM.
0
0 ,0
0 0
NO
Z
00
N Q
0 N U
OO
z
1 O
I 0
N
rs
O
N
N
1
a

CHURCH
Hainett County
Legend
[� Site_bdry
Map provided for reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Scale 1 inch = 3000 feet
3,000 6,000 ft
ANGIER
Oak Meadows SD
Old Buies Creek Road, Angier NC
Harnett County, North Carolina
NC 210
BENSON
tic
ss
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
15 December 2022
tic

Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
0
Scale 1 inch = 200 feet
200
400 ft
Oak Meadows SD
Old Buies Creek Road, Angier NC
Harnett County, North Carolina
Figure 2
Aerial Photograph
Google Earth (2022)

Map provided for reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
0
Scale 1 inch = 1000 feet
1,000 2,000 ft
Oak Meadows SD
Old Buies Creek Road, Angier NC
Harnett County, North Carolina
Figure 2
USGS 7.5' Topographic Map
Quadrangle: Coats, NC

Legend
wetland flags
Potential Wetland
Potential Water
Road
0 Site_bdry
Delineation Flags
Al - All
B1 - B9
Map provided for reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
0
Scale 1 inch = 200 feet
200 400 ft
Wetland Determination
Data Forms
Old Buies Creek Road, Angier NC
Harnett County
PINs 0672-65-0333 &
0672-65-8259
Figure 4
Potential Waters, streams,
and wetlands
21 July 2022

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Old Buies Creek Rd City/County:
Applicant/Owner: Greg Bagley
Investigator(s): Tyler Dye
Angier / Harnett County Sampling Date: 7/21 /22
State: NC Sampling Point: 1
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): drainageway Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb soils, frequently flooded
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Datum:
NWI classification: R4SBC
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
✓
II
✓
✓
✓
❑
0
0
El.
✓
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) IJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,❑✓
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,❑✓
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
. Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
, Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
, Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑, Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑. FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
0Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): <1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 3
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styracaflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
55 Y FAC
35 Y
FAC
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1. Acer rubrum 40 Y
2. Quercus nigra
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
65 = Total Cover
10 N
FAC
FAC
Quercus phellos
15
FACW
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Phytolacca americana
2. Juncus spp.
3 Carex lurida
4 Woodwardia areolata
5 Scirpus cyperinus
6. Boehmeria cylindrica
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
2 N FACU
30 Y OBL
30 Y OBL
40 Y OBL
10 N OBL
20 N FACW
132 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 66 20% of total cover: 26.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Smilax rotundifolia 20 Y FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia
15 Y
FAC
3.
4.
5.
35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5 20% of total cover: 7
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
9 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 3/1 90 10YR 5/8 10 C M/PL L
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Old Buies Creek Rd City/County:
Applicant/Owner: Greg Bagley
Investigator(s): Tyler Dye
Angier / Harnett County Sampling Date: 7/21 /22
State: NC Sampling Point: 2
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): drainageway Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb soils, frequently flooded
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Datum:
NWI classification: none
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No
No X
No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
0
❑
❑.
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑, Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑. FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
0Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styracaflua
3 Acer rubrum
4 Carya glabra
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
25 Y FACU
30 Y FAC
15 Y FAC
5 N FACU
75 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 37.5 20% of total cover: 15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1. Carya glabra 30 Y FACU
2. Liquidambar styracaflua
20 Y FAC
3 Liriodendron tulipifera
4.
5.
6.
15 Y FACU
7.
8.
65 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Phytolacca americana 15 N FACU
2. Erigeron canadensis
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
30 Y FACU
45 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
1 Smilax rotundifolia 20 Y FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3 Parthenocissus quinquefolia
25 Y FAC
15 Y FACU
4.
5.
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hyd rophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes No X
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 4/3 100 SL
10-15 10YR 6/4 98 10R 3/4 2 SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
❑
❑
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑,
❑
.11
111
❑,
❑,
.111
.11
❑,
111
❑,
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) .❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) .❑
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) .❑
Below Dark Surface (A11) .❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) .❑
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Matrix (S6) .❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Krissina Newcomb, Hal Owen & Assoc, PO Box 400, Lillington NC 27546
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Harnett CO. City: Angier
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.467861
Long.: -78.743256
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Buies Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
A
35.468608
-78.744866
0.46
wetland
404
B
35.467431
-78.743996
0.15
wetland
404
Pond
35.467999
-78.744263
1 .67
open water
404

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Fig 4 Potential Waters, streams, and wetlands
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5' 24K Quad: Coats, NC
❑■ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: web soil survey
• National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
• FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
• Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth (2022)
or n Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determi nations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Krissina Newcomb Digitally signed by Krissina Newcomb
Date: 2023.02.27 11:20:58-05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

otLZ6E
M „£Z •bb 08L
m
c
o ► a
as o
_c r.. 3
• -o 0 — (n
ZLt 0- P ao
o 0)
w �:.
c t. >
o U - m
U z o
5
= k Z 3r. U a
1
o co• o 0
cn
ma o T CCD U
0— a coo_ • .
N
Ol4LZ6£
OVELZ6£
OLZLZ6£
ol26£
35° 27' 57' N
A
M ••£Z •bb AL
N CO
N w
O 0
CN
M �
CO D
a
M •bb a8L
§
w
- ;.. � .T^'•AIM. N,i-�i. _ L 71-
u9
41/1
y C_
I I I I I
OI.4LZ6E 07ELZ6E OLZLZ3E rf JZ6E OE lLZ6E
Ma
N O UJ
0 0
Z
M ••6b •bb AL
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
�hI

MAP LEGEND
\ co
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
°. \
05 0%)
�00
o_7
E °
\ a � >
}/�k
0>
\_o
_O 0
EeL
E FE
aas ) E
\k
8)
±j/f)
wE=-
,
Very Stony Spot
/ m
/ \
Special Line Features
s
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
■
Special Point Features
Water Features
± -
0 - as f 75 \ a)
�\\). 03 \ CO 70
\}
§ \ \\6�\ \ ( _ ocE
.2 §_ / 0227'- E G 2
$ = q/0 \ }}f
j / ��k±± k \�=G
\ m 2 0.1 Ti)S �§§f
E \ \ % \)) 44 = C \\�j
0 ca § ) \\�/a/ k� , co //#/
0 0 /\\jC E\ ca /� (_o
7 0 I �a y /
. 22/k# 2 7) m2o-
.4 Lb°E° �= -/ k k /ƒ\\
® mm<` 22 = °
so d\@ g[jtu\ CJ tss0 20=
E{$ =@�j \d $k \\ / ƒI\
c$ 4 /\�\2 -§ «\ {— -6aC-
O ( \\2 Ea2ƒ\ \\ /J \° k ��\
ma S3\g = _c —°
/t2@� _± /{ 2\ 7\ a os
�a88 « _)E
}E j\\ ]\o< Ho \/ \/ /\ &Sft
Streams and Canals
Transportation
CO CO 0
Closed Depression
Gravelly Spot
05
/
o.
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
ƒ &
To / $
Severely Eroded Spot
% ƒ
$
g K >t9 e-e-i$ ©O >+ g O k
Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Soil Map —Harnett County, North Carolina
Old Buies Creek Rd
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Bb
Bibb soils, frequently flooded
0.7
3.1%
DoA
Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
2.0
9.3%
DoB
Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
13.2
60.6%
NoC
Norfolk loamy sand, 6 to 10
percent slopes
4.5
20.5%
W
Water
1.4
6.5%
Totals for Area of Interest
21.7
100.0%
l.isi)A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/3/2022
ilia Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Legend
Site_bdry
NWI Wetlands Key
riEstuarine and Marine Deepwater
riEstuarine and Marine Wetland
riFreshwater Emergent Wetland
▪ Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
riFreshwater Pond
. Lake
ri Other
Riverine
I1
Map provided for reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
0
Scale 1 inch = 1000 feet
500 1,000 ft
Oak Meadows SD
Old Buies Creek Road, Angier NC
Harnett County, North Carolina
Figure 5
USFWS National Wetland
Inventory (NWI)
23 February

N
Legend
I I
Old Buies Creek Rd
Panels Flood Hazard Areas
PaliticalAreas AE
Stream Centerline Ar Air Floodway(AE)
Cross Sections 0.2 % Chance Annual Flood Hazard
Levee Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Aug 3, 2022
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
5W 3

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SITE PLANS
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

! SITE
MONTACUE ROAD
LOCATION MAP NTS
795.85
DANNY J. HONEYCUTT
DB 1399—PC 0100
ZONING = RA-30
12
19'
OPEN SPACE
OPEN SPACE
BASIN 2
,$ \\sus.
SETBACKS
Minimum from ➢ord semoc4 95 k.
Minimum lot 00 n.
inimum rearside a back 25 a.
ft.
Minimumside Yore setbback, c 30 ft
Minimum
side yards corner lot on thorougM1fore
�i:isetback 10 n
.<sr 120133'
17
255.95
IMPERVIOUS SURFACES
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ALLOWED (24%)
21.72 AC x 24%
ROADS
DRI'JES
HOUSES FOOTPRINT MAX
227069 SQ FT
39952 SQ FT
1200 SQ FT
5997 SQ jT/
\ (7� 'I; n 76\
al c
/ „\,-,,,,I
91
10!
R 200\000
N SPACE �\4
ALL ROAD SLOPES TO
BE 3:1 MINIMUM.
10p m° emu- - TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
00515 ES
SS.91ir INLET PROTECTION
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
_— SILT FENCE
N_°OaToo - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
/
195.78
580' 26' 35' `N
4
SI"—
LLR=200.000
112.7867
4
-560. 70
HARNETT PROPERTIES GROUP
DB 3245—PC 0455 A WETLAND
ZONING — RA 30
AREA TOTAL — 19,076 SO FT
AREA IMPACTED =0 sq ft
B WETLAND
AREA TOTAL = 71342 SQ FT
AREA IMPACTED =2984 sq ft
1 zs"
3
9' '13
28.
!2
SITE DATA
PER DEED
AREA 14 DRAINAGE AREA
ZONING \
PIN NUMBIERS
DEED BON —PAGE
FEMA PANE #
NO BUILDINGA LOTS
FL00DPLAIN \
TOWNSHIP
STREET FOOTAGE
LOT SIZES \
UTILITIES
STREET LIGHTS
\
VICKEY SURLES GREEN
DB 909—PG 0432
ZONING RA-30
S61' 37' 01•"7
113.06 .0-I
�'i65i14y� \
49W
\
37
57�, 49,
i 5763 i
5j6 \ \
\ S76' 33' 48.86"9/ 707.130'
110.37
21.72 AC
33.1
RA30
0672-65-8259, 062-65-0333
2061-0032 & 2061-0035
ENTRANCE
5'020'
EASEMENT)
OWNER/DEVELOPER
WFE-E T LLG
113 DUNG'NSBY CT.
CARY, NC 27511
Ph. (919)-522-5626
N/A
26
AE
BLACK RIVER TOWNSHIP
2032 FT
25000 SO FT + 100' MIN WIDTH
PRIVATE SEWER PUBLIC WATER
PFR DUKE POWER
ENGINEER
GREG BAGLEY
805 COKESBURY ROAD
FUQUAY VARINA NC 2'526
Ph. [phone]
SITE PLAN
1"=60'
REVISIONS
PRELIMINARY
SITE PLAN
OAK MEADOW
SUBDIVISION
0
Sheet Number
SI
of 1

/
s4>
280.50
/ -
d / I
I
ILL].
/
rN
rN
0
it
/
/I
/1
/
125.19
\
\
'09 \ / -� \ \:/
\ �s/\
>9 \N
AP r 13, �\ /\
S \ 01
2�+ 5 \, \\ ,,. \�\ �cP° \ \ \
\ \�N6/,\6$••\ \\�\; \\ \\ x OPEN
\ \ <\\ \
N
-''.\--- ---- \
/
Il
S87' 45' 2:.46'E 1►01.33'
/
\
/
/
7
7
7
7
/
/
/
/
/
248.22
)
/
/ Ni
//
OPEN SPACE/ / �\ /
\'- / Omoo
/ 111.11
\ \� `
03
\a.0 \
N
1 L=20 5 ,\R:2 0.000 \ \
\�=58 352
\
\\\ \\
1.1 � .
7
/
Q DO wit N
Mb
cb
/
9-3
N
\
\
\
/
\
\\ \ \
\ \ \
\ \
\ \
\ \ \
\ 1
\ \ \
___O TLET PO)ECT O\ ) 1 \\
J ) 1 ) 1 )
P PT ' 1 ,L cr 5' , c = 12'� / = 2E' /
P P-trp- La =,1 c = ° 4 W� 43 / / / /
/ P;# 3 Le'= 42', d _--0:-62' W� 44/ i' // //
// /' / // i7 /
/ 7
7
\ 1
i \\ \
\ I i\-- \ \
\\ /) 1
-
\�\
\
\
\
\
\
795.85
191
/
/
/
/
/
/
11
11
r
/
/
Too
23
74
4,40
TDD
SF
TDD
SF
LOD
SPACE
\ N
i 1 9 \\ \\\ \
ILLn\�?\ F \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
/\ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \
SF
SF
0
WADDLES
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
SILT FENCE
LIMITSIDc DISTURBANCE
/
N SPACE/
ALL R AD SLOPES TO
(
In
PATH
ft) 61() , .,,,,/,N\
g ,____i 1,1,<0`7t; 4)cp
rc(S,1 I 4
4o* 26' 35'
\
1
(
/ / I ! / //
/
41. _
/
/
560.
rri
•
II C4
cn
4
N-L 44.634, R=2 .000
ni IQ/
13 WETALpNb //
AREMIWPACTED =2984 sq ft/
, Oak Meadow Subdivision
Storm Drain Calculations
CALC
STRUCTURE
INVERT
INVERT
SLOPE
TOTAL
Q
PIPE
PIPE
LG
UPSTREAM
DNSTREAM
(FT/FT)
AREA
AREA
C
I
TOTAL
DIA
DIA
Pipe 1
52
290.86
290.30
0.011
0.20
0.20
0.5
7.2
0.72
6.49
18
Pipe 2
46
265.49
265.07
0.009
0.85
1.05
0.5
7.2
3.78
12.47
18
Temp Pipe 1
46
261.30
260.90
0.009
0.36
0.33
0.5
7.2
1.18
8.13
18
Temp Pipe 2
46
261.70
261.30
0.009
0.33
0.36
0.5
7.2
1.40
8.67
18
067.
76,
-64
\-,1 r-r----;--3 49"N\
51
\ \
\ I 1 \ \
\ I \-)°\
13.06
4 _
OXP..
(--) to \\ \ \
ENTRANCE
EASEMENT)
81
/
97.58
88.
OW \ DEVELOFT
IPS\
EE
•
113/ DUNCANSBY 805aaK__FSB.LI-RY- -Re
rcb
180
co
zz
60'
120'
10)
GRADING PLAN
r<S/
ONTAGUE
6
/
Drawn/Design By:
' Fiifliar7\i \/nrinn N f 7757A
GRADING
EROSION CONTROL
L
OAK MEADOW
SUBDIVISION
FOR
i
Sheet Number
of
1

Oak Meadow SD
Proposed Wetland Impacts
W1 - 0.069 acre wetland impact for road crossing (culvert and fill)
OP�P��SPAC 60,7o
soa —.TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
WADDLES
INLET PROTECTION
SILT PENCE
sr
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
w
RitaToo
15.C}236
t
n
I' SPACE/
ALL R AD SLOPES TO
BE 3;1 INIMUM.
B WETLAND
AREA TOTAL = 71342 SO FT
AREA -IMPACTED =2984 sq ft
6 0' 34'
60'
120'

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENDANGERED SPECIES AND DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

KYE.p T {Ds ry
-
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0029534
Project Name: Oak Meadow SD
January 02, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

01/02/2023 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see hops://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

01/02/2023 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

01/02/2023 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

01/02/2023 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2023-0029534
Project Name: Oak Meadow SD
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Old Buies Creek Rd
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.467927700000004,-78.74363667002972,14z
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

01/02/2023 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Birds
NAME
STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Fishes
NAME
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Endangered

01/02/2023 4
Clams
NAME
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Threatened
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

01/02/2023
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
BREEDING
SEASON
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6177
Breeds Apr 1 to
Aug 31
Breeds May 1 to
Sep 30

01/02/2023 2
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds Mar 1 to
Jul 15
Breeds Mar 15
to Aug 25
Breeds Apr 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds
elsewhere
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee

01/02/2023
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
- probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel
BCC - BCR
1111 111111 IIIh1
Bachman's Sparrow 1111
BCC Rangewide --+
(CON)
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Brown -headed
Nuthatch
1111 1111
1111 1111
- All 11IIII11 ■III■I r ■1 I -
- -w 11IIII11 ■III■ ---1 ---1 -1--- m

01/02/2023 4
BCC - BCR
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
III■III ■III r1-
Il11111iin■I
11III11■III11F1-
Rusty Blackbird '--- +-- --� — + -- ---- ---� --�— — +�
BCC - BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds hops://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as

01/02/2023 5
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can

01/02/2023 6
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

01/02/2023 7
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Hal Owen & Associates
Name: Krissina Newcomb
Address: PO Box 400
City: Lillington
State: NC
Zip: 27546
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

r ■■■
■■ tx NC DEPARTMENT CF
■ ■ti■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■■■
January 2, 2023
Krissina Newcomb
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
PO Box 400
Lillington, NC 27546
RE: Oak Meadow SD
Dear Krissina Newcomb:
Roy Cooper, Governor
0. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
N CN H D E-20380
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/Li stOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler(ancdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely.
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
ap 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH, !VC 27603 * 16S1 HAIL SERVICE CENTER, PALEIGI-1, rfC 27699
OFC 91g,J07&120 • FAX [phone]

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
O -
c
(6
4 c
O (6
cL
U
U)
0-
2004-Pre
Somatochlora
georgiana
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
N r-
Q ul
13
U +) c
N .a
s
o
1 c
O U
_C U
4 O
_c i
O a
n
: c 0
TU N
13
EC N u1
N
C.)
c D-
n) m
E V 0
1 to i
O ▪ -0 a)
O o >,
-0 c
(113 c o
O m
▪ C
++, 0
T
c o
E
a)N q_
+, aD .-
N v) a)
0 D D
3 n ID
U u1
O c
o a
N o m
L IF, E
co c o
• m
c6 n '_
Q m >
.0c c
C c''''
ID o
o
• C UI
O o v
Z CI 0_

NCNHDE-20380: Oak Meadow SD
Buffered Project Boundary
Project Boundary
M
0
M
N
0)
M
a

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE MAP
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

Legend
baseroad
Site_bdry
Historic Properties
n Local_District_Boundaries
n NCHPO_NR_SL_DOE_Boundaries
0 NCHPOpoints
Map provided for reference only. Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Scale 1 inch = 1000 feet
1,000 2,000 ft
Oak Meadows SD
Old Buies Creek Road, Angier NC
Harnett County, North Carolina
NC State Historic Preservation
Office (NCSHPO)
2/20/2023

1110384IO hald■rg
Site ID 14TO314
Status SO
Site Name Outbuilding
Description
Notes
Local Status None
Year Surrey 2002-2003
Year Surrey Updated
HD status None
DOE report or Local Link
County Harnett
Quad Name Coats
Township Black River
Density L
Location W side SR 1542, 0.35 mi N SR 154OAngier vicinity
Photo Link
Spatial Accuracy
Latitude 35.468801
Longitude -78. 741695
Internal