20230342 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230302

I I
1 1 . 1
DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? *
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
1/25/2023
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20230342 1
Is a payment required for this project? *
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone] Zachary Thomas:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Carolina Landing
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Wyatt Brown
lb. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/2/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Snipes Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C:NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.76766
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-78.28915
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
LAST INVESTMENTS LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
05157, 0993
2c. Contact Person:
Scott Lee
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
2d. Address
Street Address
104 STATE AVE STE 103
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
CLAYTON NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27520-5116 US
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Wyatt Brown
4b. Business Name:
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
4c. Address
Street Address
242 Batten Farm Road
Address Line 2
City
Selma
Postal / Zip Code
27576
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4e. Fax Number:
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
16. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
same
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Zebulon
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
271300-15-0225
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Snipes Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C:NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011503
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
-99.0
State / Province / Region
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The Project Area is an -98 acre tract with approximately 70 acres in woodland. Snipes Creek runs along the eastern property boundary. Counting Snipes Creek, there are 3 Neuse
Buffered streams on the property. There is a new S/D being constructed (Phase 1) of Carolina Landing immediately to the north. The general land use in the area is farming and woodland.
Subdivisions are also being built in the vicinity.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
-1.22 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
-4448.0 Ift
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose is to construct an -100 lot single family homesites for the growing needs of northern Johnston County.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Since most of the Project Area is wooded, bull dozers, motor graders and track hoes will be used to clear the trees, stumps to clear and grade the streets. The streets will be asphalt and
built to DOT specifications. The crossings will be constructed with stream pump arounds and will be installed with track hoes. The utilities lines will be installed in the streets and the septic
will be onsite on each individual homesite. An approved sediment and control plan will be followed and inspected by Johnston County Stormwater. I don't know of any indirect impacts.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes
Comments:
No G Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-02145
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Wyatt Brown
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
6a. Is this a phased project? *
Yes G No
6b. If yes, explain.
The first phase is in the process of being constructed because it was on high ground with no wetland, stream or stream buffers impact. This PCN is for the final phases which have 2 creek
crossings.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
Not to my knowledge.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition *
(7)
2g. Impact
area*
Phase 2 impact
culvert
P
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.010
(acres)
0
0
P
Small -Basin Wetland
0
Yes
Both
0.000
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.010
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.010
2i. Comments:
The Impact 4 crossing does not have any wetland impact. The additional impact line above was inadvertently added and I can't delete it.
3. Stream Impacts

3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
st
Phase 4 impact
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 2
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
91
(linear feet)
S2
Phase 2 impact
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 3
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
116
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
207
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
207
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
3j. Comments:
Phase 4 - 91 Ift total (66.4 Ift culvert, 25 Ift riprap) = 66.4 Ift impact toward mitigation (66.4 x 3 ft wide=166 sqft)
Phase 2 - 116.1 total (56.11ft culvert, 60.0 Ift riprap) = 56.1 Ift impact toward mitigation (56.1 x 3 ft wide=168.3 sq ft).
166 sq ft + 168.3 sqft = 304.3 sqft total stream impact, 66.41ft + 56.11ft = 122.5 Ift total impact
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
p Neuse
O Catawba
O Goose Creek
O Other
L Tar -Pamlico
O Randleman
O Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Phase 2, allowable
P
Stream 2
No
6,995
4,281
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
6,995.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
4,281.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
6,995.00 4,281.00
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
O
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
In design, the Phase 4 Impact Site, Street A was strategically located to be south of the small wetland on Lot 25 and also avoiding impact of the Neuse
Buffer to the south. Headwalls will be used on both crossings to minimize stream impact and the road shoulders were narrowed from 8 foot to 6 foot
wide. Both crossings are needed to access lots across the streams.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A pump around is required when each crossing is installed. The work is required not to begin in times of high flow or when heavy rainfall is predicted. All
wetlands will be clearly marked and the approved sediment and erosion control plan will required to be followed and inspected by the Johnston County
Stormwater.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Impacts are less than the threshold.

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
Johnston County Stormwater will evaluate and approved the Stormwater Plan.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
In my opinion another subdivision will not lead to additional development in the area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No

5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage -Letter attached below.
IPaC-1) Tricolored Bat -Is known to hibernate in caves and mines. There are none of these on the property. 2) Red -cockaded Woodpecker -"The red -
cockaded woodpecker makes its home in mature pine forests." There are no old growth pine forest on the Project Area. No habitat, no affect. 3) Neuse
River Waterdog- "They are usually found in streams wider than 15 meters (m), deeper than 100 centimeters (cm), and with a main channel flow rate
greater than 10cm/second." No habitat, our the Phase 2 and Phase 4 streams are both 1st order streams with low flows. 4) Carolina Madtom-"Prefer
clean water 1 to 3 feet deep with permanent flow and are not tolerant of siltation and turbidity." The phase 4 crossing is intermittent flow, the Phase 2
feature begins at the back of lots from a subdivision, also an earlier phase of this subdivision drains to this stream and there is some siltation in the
water. Our location does not overlap the critical habitat, No habitat no affect. 6) Atlantic Pigtoe "Dependent on clean, moderate -flowing water with high
dissolved oxygen content in creek and riverine environments:' Our location does not overlap the critical habitat. As stated both are 1st order streams w/o
clean high dissolved water. No habitat, no affect. 7) Dwarf Wedgemussel - "To survive, they need a silt -free, stable streambed and welloxygenated water
free of pollutants." No habitat, No affect. 8) Tar River Spinymussel - "Lives in relatively silt -free uncompacted gravel and/or coarse sand in fast -flowing,
well oxygenated stream reaches." No habitat, no affect. 9) Yellow Lance - "lanceolata is dependent on clean, moderate flowing water with high dissolved
oxygen content in riverine or larger creek environments (USFWS 2018)." Our location does overlap the critical habitat, no habitat no affect. 10) Monarch
Butterfly - "Are found in meadows, roadsides, and sandy areas where milkweed plants grow." Our project is mostly forests, no milkweeds have been
found on the Project area, No habitat, No affect.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
None in Johnston County
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
Website above, aerial of the general area attached below.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? *
Website above
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Carolina Landing Supporting Attachments.pdf 8.74MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
The Neuse Buffer authorization will be submitted to Johnston County.
Signature V
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Wyatt Brown
Signature
94wee agictur

Date
3/2/2023

PCN Application Additional Information Package
Name: Carolina Landing
County: Johnston
Date: 3/02/23

Table of Contents
1)Agent Letter
2) Maps
A)Soils
B) Quad
3)Project Drawings
a) Design and Impact Sheet
4) Endangered Species
5)SHPO Document
6) Neuse Buffer Determination
7)Stream Photos

8/2/2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Joshua Deal
Re: Burnett Tract, Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described (NCPIN 271300-05-8440 ) for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Also, Mr Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.
Scott Lee
Last Investments, LLC

� �yy
�r
* * * DISCLAIMER
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
t
CARD 7 J$G PH 1
�r ���LI,N-A.rL�AN-DING `• ,
A�
CAROLINA{LL NG-A
.•
E3
N1- Wt %
Z ;+
Pa'Pa'D
MCInk,A'
•..
Scale: 1:4949 - 1 in. = 412.38 feet
Johnston County GIS
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.) March 2, 2023

3/2/23, 10:56 AM
The National Map -Advanced Viewer
11lelp
I
24 Carolina Landing Dr, Zebulon X
- I ,
_ a •'
-
Show search results for 24 Carolina L...
1+
1, �
f�
+
sir
�'++
=
I
—
��+�•
*
'r+
�
'S
•'
toTI
. f
' 3
REP
{ G
—
� '
r
I �
ti Li
Scale: 1:36,112
Zoom Level: 14
0.4m i
78.293 35.765 Long Lat
https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ 1 /1

N/F
ROBKIN, LLC
DB 5498, PG 236
PHASE TWO, SECTION TWO IMPACT SITE
I I / / O WETLANDS IMPACT 0.01 AC.
O
STREAM IMPACT 116.1 LF (56.1 CULVERT, 60.0 DISS PAD)
1SCALE I 150'/ / / ` D RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT 6,995.3 SF ZONE 1
4,358.1 SF ZONE 2
I � 1
III i SEE IMPACT SHEET FOR MORE DETAIL
17
16
„� } 15 � � 2 C� ��•'• i � 1J
44 45 °I 46 I 47 4 49 50 51
I
\ l l 12 � \ ••/
LINA LANDIN RI �50'4BL14w \ ��.�. 61 / \
I� Q I� I .•y f �_ � 1
�I
Q_II o
� U I I 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 70 69 A I.
O O O O O
:��
Cp I �o I I I SE—
A ATE LO ATION HO SE
(I 21 �� i i ND SE SYS EM (Ty .)
�.,
N/F
� � � � 22 ♦ k I � � / o ``\ > � ,» >� � CALVIN BAILEY HEIRS
\Y\,\ \ DB 604, PG 314
1 I 80 81 82 3 86 87 88 89 90 91 � 92 (g�) 94 � � i \ I
I I ST 11 EET B 5 P_U_13LI R/W)
J I
e II \ 1
I 24 \ O 14 113 112 111 110 10 0 10 06 98 \ I I
O O m 10 10 10 101 10 o \ 6\
a�
ILLJ
OND
Zr
26
38 a / o
I , 27 I
f I 1
rTR E A PUBLIC W
I K �`'�
I T356
35
\\� I
33 � � 1111 \ � •� � \
PH%S&--FOUR IMP CT S TE �---- o
WETLANDS IMPACT 0 SF
STREAM IMPACT 91.4 LF (66.4 CULVERT, 25.0 DISIPATOR PAD)
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT 0 SF N/F
SEE IMPACT SHEET FOR MORE DETAIL DELBERT AND BARBARA RAMSEY
DB 1350, PG 983
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA
1. INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASIN.
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
J. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS. DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA. AREA
TO BE DEWATERED SHALL BE EQUAL TO ONE DAY'S WORK.
5. PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE
IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST).
7. ALL GRADING AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED IN ONE DAY WITHIN THE PUMP AROUND AREAS
BETWEEN THE IMPERVIOUS DIKES. THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ONLY
SHOW THE UPPER AND LOWER EXTENT OF WORK FOR EACH STREAM SEGMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE(S) FOR EACH DAY'S WORK.
8. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND BACKFILL. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA WITH SEED AND MULCH.
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
WITH ROCK PAD
EXISTING SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
TERRAIN \
STREAM BANK
FILTER FABRIC WITH 8 INCHES
OF SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE
NOTE. PROVIDE STABLIZED OUTLET TO STREAMBANK
N 0 TES
1. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATED SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2. IMPERVIOUS DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM STREAM FLOW WHEN NECESSARY.
3. ALL GRADED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS.
4. MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. THIS INCLUDES
POLYETHYLENE SHEETING, DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS, AND HOSES.
5. PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA.
EXAMPLE OF PUMP AROUND OPERATION
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
UTILIZE A STABILIZED OUTLET ( I I \
INSTEAD OF A SPECIAL STILLING 1
BASIN IF PUMPING CLEAN WATER PECIAL STILLING BASIN
IMPERVIOUS DIKE DEWATERING PUMP
TEMPORARY I I I XI STING STREAM CHANNEL
FLEXIBLE HOSE I
I I
I1 I
I
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
1 \\FLOW
PUMP —AROUND PUMP'` \�
w
a
^
� N
^ N _ E
O
FHA ��^Q)
MI•'•'Lr�, z p� 00
OC'JO_s
W
SEALS
CA
SEAL
22993
GINE��
DocuSigned by:
E
t,t, f�i1n t,s �V .
A34868BOA9C54F8...
02/28/2023
REVISIONS
u
O
O V1
O
REVIEWED BY: LRH
DESIGNED BY: LRH
DRAWN BY: LRH
DATE: AUG 2020
PROJECT NUMBER: 1912
BUFFER AND WETLANDS
IMPACTS -OVERALL
IMP - I

HOUSE A SEPTI SYSTEM FOR I I \
L T 55 S ALL BE L ATED OUTSIDE 1 \ \ \ LF 78" RC'P
Q lW + y \ PLUS HW EACH ND
OF�THE RIPA�\AN BUO I o\. \ �. AT SLOPE \
1 � C
a
290
-
270
260
250
240
230
220
y \ INV IN o 29.0
DA = 91.6 AC I \
y W
Q 25 = Q 1 CFS
RY IN IER\TTS ONE FO T \
BSeW STREA BED FOR
A A IC LIFE ASSAGE
y \ SEE P MP ARO ND DETAI
SHEET
P-1 \ �\
\ \
,W
\ \
\ 7 0 I g I I z�I ),:, 1 Q � I .-4
1 \� —
8 67Li cn
II1�
cn
cj Li
cn
Q�00
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF\IOUSE \ \
AND SEPTIC SSTEM (TYP.) —
INV 256.0
INV 249. \ 1.
\-
CAROL NA LANDING DR — PHASE TWO, SECTION TWO PLAN
SCALE 1" = 50'
�~
Pr
posed Grade
Existing
Ground
PROP 6»
\
\21 PVC WjL
\ 6 33i
MIN 3'
COVER
r
---
/ BURY INVERTS ONE FOOT
BELOW SIRE
M
56 LF 78"
CP
AT 1.8% SLOPE
INV IN 229.
PLACE CLASS
NO HIGHEF
"B" RIP RAP
THAN THE E
IN THE STREAM
ISTING BED ELEVATION
BED
AND ALSO
OF 60 LF
LINE THE STIR
ROM THE OU
AM BANKS FIR
LET.
A DISTANC
22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00
00 r- 0 n N N O r- 00 O 0 00 O N U7 00 00 r- 00 00 n c0 r7 I�
On 0Oq Lq 4O� 0�N Oo047 r-� O� r-� U�
coo U)I- LO�t LO 00 �tU) nN n0) N00 nl- nl- �t00 �t00 �t0
N c0 N U7 N U7 CN N�t N�t N�t N r7 N r7 N r7 N r7 N n N n N n
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
CAR OL N A LANDING DR — PHASE TWO. SECTION TWO
SCALE 1 " = 50' (H)
SCALE 1" = 10' (v) )
PROFILE
TOTAL SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
WETLANDS 0.01 AC
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
\\\\\X 6,995.3 SF
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
4,358.1 SF
207.5 LF OF STREAM IMPACT
122.5 LF CULVERT
85.0 LF DISSIPATOR PAD
BOTH STREAMS ARE AN
AVERAGE OF 3 FT IN WIDTH
NOTE: NO ADDITIONAL IMPACTS ARE EXPECTED FROM
SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLATION
IMPACT MINIMIZATION NOTES:
o
/ It /
o
��STA 1 W I N
ST EET A 9 30.66 \ \ N o E
CAR OLL FARM WAY w C
ST 12+43.30
Z\5
W W Iw
w
\ v v v I W 1
64 LF 42" RCP
PLU HW EACH END
�q T 1 % SLOPE o
INV IN 259.5
DA= 13.9AC i -�-
Q = 45.6 CFS
PIPE INVERTS SHALL BE
-13-6�R/ED ONE FOOT FOR
AQUATIZ"27FE f'�4.SSAGE� +00 N SEALS
SEE PUMP AROUND DETAIL ,
SHEETIMP-1 , D"q2
ESS/p,�
450 R
` = SEAL
ll 22993
FNGINEE�
DocuSigned by:
Ec,c,
1 � A34868BOA9C54F8...
02/28/2023
37 \ \ \
REVISIONS
� 143�-
1
\�E 1
\ RIPAR AN B�
FAR
\ I III \
APPROXIMATE LOCH TION�/ OF HOUSE o
/1' U AND SEPTIC SYSTEM ( YP.)
W
STREET A — PHASE FOUR PLAN
Q
THE TYPICAL SECTION FOR THE ROADWAY HAS BEEN MINIMIZED TO THE
EXTENT THAT NCDOT ALLOWS — PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER WIDTHS AND
FRONT SLOPES ARE AT MINIMUM VALUES. A HEADWALL IS PROPOSED ON
EACH END OF THE PIPES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT FROM THE FILL SLOPE.
ALSO, THE VERTICAL DESIGN FOR THE ROAD MEETS THE MINIMUM RATE
OF VERTICAL CURVATURE WHILE NOT PROVIDING EXCESS FILL OVER THE
PIPE THAT WOULD PUSH THE FILL SLOPE FURTHER INTO THE WETLANDS.
SCALE 1" = 50'
Q
G
ade
co
[IfProposed
0
J
No
60
_
0�
o'
Qf
Q Q
U (n
N
J
W
Existing
Ground
1
64 LF
42" RCP
90 SLOPE
AT 3.
INV IN
01
259.5
AA
BED FOR
AQUATIC L
FE PASSAGE
PLACE
CLASS "B" RID
RAP IN THE
STREAM BED
(SO /7
IS FLUSH WIT
THE BOTTOM
OF THE CHANNEL)
AND qLSO
LINE THE
STREAM BANKS
FOR A DIST
NCE
OF 251
LF FROM EACr
OUTLET.
6+00
7+00
8+00
9+00
10+00
11+00
U7 00
U'7 (0
0
r7 0
00 (D
00-) 000
0-) N
N r7
N O
N n
007
co r
0
Nr�
00 q
U7 0 OU�
Nrl�
r7 7
4 Oq
6rl�
I-m
r,O
,1-
r-N
O—
(D0-) O00
O�
Or-
Oc0
Oco
NI-
Nr-
NI-
NI-
NI-
NCO NcO
NCO
NCO
Nco
Nco
N
N
N
N
N
N N
N
N
N
N
STREET
A — PHASE
FOUR
PROFILE
SCALE 1" =
50 (H)
SCALE 1 " =
10' (v) )
0 N
r--� O
Coco
N co
N
REVIEWED BY: LRH
DESIGNED BY: LRH
DRAWN BY: LRH
DATE: SEPT 2019
PROJECT NUMBER: 1912
BUFFER AND WETLANDS
IMPACTS SHEET
IMP-2

Roy Cooper, Governor
0■0■0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■0■o NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
February 28, 2023
wyatt brown
Brown's Environmental Group, inc
242 Batten Farm Road
Selma, NC 27576
RE. Carolina Landing
Dear wyatt brown.
D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-21093
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here.
httl2s //www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR71MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Carolina Landing
February 28, 2023
NCNHDE-21093
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Group Nservation
a it I Date =
Amphibian 2396 Necturus lewisi Neuse River Waterdog 2021-12-14
Dragonfly or 33753 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre
Damselfly georgiana
Freshwater 18403 Alasmidonta Dwarf Wedgemussel 1998-07-08
Bivalve heterodon
Freshwater 10152 Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater 2007-09-28
Bivalve
Freshwater 3081 Fusconaia masoni Atlantic Pigtoe 2019-06-19
Bivalve
Freshwater 3382 Villosa constricts Notched Rainbow 1998-07-22
Bivalve
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
NEU/Little River (Franklin/Wake/Johnston/ Wayne) R1 (Exceptional)
Aquatic Habitat
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
Johnston County Open Space Johnston County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - Johnston NC DPS, Division of Emergency
County Management
USFWS Critical Habitat - Neuse River Waterdog US Fish and Wildlife Service
Element
Occurrence
Rank
C
H?
H?
A
E
H?
Accuracy
Federal
State
Status
tatus
3-Medium
Threatened
Threatened
5-Very
---
Significantly
Low
Rare
3-Medium
Endangered
Endangered
Global State
Rank Rank
i
G2 S2
G3G4 S1?
G1G2 S1
3-Medium --- Threatened G4
3-Medium Threatened Threatened G1
3-Medium --- Threatened G3
Collective Rating
C1 (Exceptional)
Owner Type =
Local Government
State
Federal
S3
S3
S3
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on February 28, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q4, Winter (January)
2023. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-21093: Carolina Landing
O
Earpsboro
Fd b Earpsboro Rd
�a
s�nr0 Rd
F
`325 ft
9�
� 39
yes
Richardson
C:
96 Q
r,� a
it
N
WE
0 .28 0.55 1.1 Miles
S
February 28, 2023
®
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
®
Managed Area (MAREA)
Q
Buffered Project Boundary
Q
Project Boundary
So uross. Fsh, Airbus DS. USGS. NGA. NASA, CGIAR. N Robinson. NCFAS.
NLS. OS, NMA. Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat GSA, Geoland, FFMA,
It-mapand the GIS user community
Sources. Esri, HERE. Garm in. FAO. NOAA, USGS. © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User in,
Page 3 of 3

2/28/23, 7:24 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
Johnston County, North Carolina
10
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Pnct nffira Rnv 2277E
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 1/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM
I V.7L V I I IL.0 LJ U^ J.J / LLJ
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
IPaC: Explore Location resources
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
�o�
Foy
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 2/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required. 4 T>
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 3/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Birds
NAME
STATUS
Proposed Endangered
STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Edda g
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
0
NAME � STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog NecturM s lewisi Threatened
Wherever found _"
There i al critical habitat for this species. Your location does
no la e critical habitat.
t s:// os. ws.gov/ecp/species/6772
V%4Nft00lF
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 4/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Tar River Spinymussel Parvaspina steinstansana
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
Endangered
Endangered
%0%
Threatened
Wherever found 1
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does/
not overlap the critical habitat. I'M i
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Vitips://4os.fws.gov/ecp/�Species/9743
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
Migratory birds
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 5/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov//program/migratory-birds/species
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-tak 41
migratory -birds 0\
Nationwide conservation measures for birds 00(
https://www.fws.g
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ bell. -This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 6/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (L.)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high. . % N
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort ( )
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 7/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 1 Urn grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort no data
SPECIES ]AN FEB MAR APR MAY 1UN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Chimney Swift
BCC Ra gewide i ,IIII III —�II IIII IIII --- —
(CON)
Wood Thrush —__ +++ 4-
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 8/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., banding, and
citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering 4
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? %�Aklo
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Core tion Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 9/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
e 0 %
Facilities
1�14—
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 10/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. IIIIAk
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District. �
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to
determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. '
This location overlaps the following wetlands: Co
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAN -
PF01 C
RIVERINE
R4SBC
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory
website
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether
wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 11/12

2/28/23, 7:24 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
INW) VI"
�oOe
Foy
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/TQVJKVNQKNDFNKKYRUJKOBXM2E/resources 12/12

• 7 736 Ear Ear o

6"1�/� l", lPcl"Ifij
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
POST OFFICE BOX 2263
SMITHFIELD, N.C. 27577
[phone]
October 27, 2017
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
242 Batten Farm Rd
Selma, NC 27576
Subject: Neuse River Buffer Call
NBR# NB 17-018
Project Name: Burnett Tract Parcel (NC PIN# 271300-05-8359)
Location / Directions: Hwy 96, Zebulon, NC
Subject Stream: UT to Snipes Creek (C, NSW)
Determination Date: October 27, 2017 Staff: Carlos Bagley, PE
Stream
USGS
Latitude
Longitude
Feature
Type
Not
Subject
Subject
Start @
Stop @
Soil
Survey
(Dec.
(Dec.
(E/UP)*
Topo
Degrees)
Degrees)
POND
®
❑
S1
I
❑
®
Flagging
®
®
35.767088
-78.292021
S2
Not
®
❑
®
❑
present
S3
P
❑
®
Throughout
*EIIIP = Ephemeral IIntermittent/Perennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above that are checked "Subject" to the Johnston County Neuse
Riparian Buffer Ordinance (Section 14-393 Johnston County Code of Ordinances) has or have been
approximately shown on either the Soil Survey of Johnston County, North Carolina (1994) or the most
recent version of the 1:24,000 (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic maps prepared by the United States
Geologic Survey (USGS), and have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify
it to be a stream. Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or
is not present on the property. There may be other streams located on your property that do not show up
on the maps referenced above but still may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps
of Engineers and/or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources.
Printed on recycled paper i-r

This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by Johnston County may request a
determination by the Director of the Division of Water Resources c/o the 401 and Buffer
Permitting Unit, or its successor. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of the
date of this letter or from the date the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent
owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the Director must be submitted
in writing with a copy of this letter to:
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, a request for an appeal has been
made in writing within sixty (60) days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any Local,
State, and Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the
subject property (stated above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the
proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office at [phone] and the Division of Water Resources 401 & Buffer
Permitting Unit at [phone].
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Carlos Bagley at (919)
209-8333 or via email at carlos.ba,ley(aijoluistonnc.com.
Sincerely,
Carlos Bagley, PE
Environmental Manager

r
t
'k.
i pa D
I4
4 '
4-1
5 o
pa
S3- Subject to Neuse Buffer
CeB
FaB
CeB
MCA f
wt.
... P D 3,, y g�� ry
.v! aepl M 1 a Q
r v.
' : P • ,•, . *may ,� �,
J r •
McB
-Not Present
S1- Subject to Neuse Buffer ry I.1'`
1*5
- { 4
CR
Fra
x xtv: • " ""` ,.*ate.,
i ON
h T Tl a
Johnston County Public Utilities
309 E. Market Street
P.O. Box 2263
Smithfield, NC 27577
Propertry Info:
Burnett Tract
Johnston County Soil Survey NC PIN 271300-05-8359
880 440 0 880
Feet

I

3/2/23, 11:20 AM
IMG_7793.jpg
loft 4
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGrcrnmzXtvgNZktKpkvgFqDn PC?projector=1 &messagePartld=0.3 1 /1

3/2/23, 11:19 AM IMG_7792.jpg
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGrcrnmzXtvgNZktKpkvgFqDnPC?projector=1 &messagePartld=0.1 1 /1