20200035 Ver 1_LibertyRock_100135_MY0_2023_20230303

ID#* 20200035 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:
Ryan Hamilton
Initial Review Completed Date 03/06/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 3/3/2023
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Jeremiah Dow [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20200035 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
County: Randolph
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload: LibertyRock_100135_MYO_2023.pdf 24.78MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature:

MONITORING YEAR 0
ANNUAL REPORT
FINAL
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Randolph County, NC
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 03030003
DMS Project No. 100135
February 2023 NCDEQ Contract No. 7877-01
DMS RFP No. 16-007877
NCDWR Project No. 2020-0035 v1
USACE Action ID Number 2020-00047
Data Collection Period: October 2022 - January 2023
PREPARED FOR:
30
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

It I Z.: *�,
W 1 LDLAN DS
February 28, 2023
Jeremiah Dow
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
Subject: DIMS Comments on Liberty Rock Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 Report
DMS Project Number 100135
Randolph County, North Carolina
Contract No. 7877-01
Dear Mr. Dow,
We have reviewed the comments on the MYO Report for the above referenced project dated February
20, 2023. Below are responses to each of the comments. For your convenience, the comments are
reprinted with responses in italics.
1. Table 2, last row says "Trees in each plot must average 7 ft at MY5 and 10 ft at MY7 (excluding
shrub and canopy species)." Please remove or replace word "canopy" with correct terminology.
The typo has been corrected and now reads "sub -canopy."
2. Section 3.5 — says an additional crest gauge will be installed in MYO. During the site visit this had
not been done, so please say it will be installed in MY1.
The report has been updated to reflect that the additional crest gauge was installed on
February 21, 2023 in MY1.
3. Should Water Surface (WSF) be shown on the Rocky River Reach 1 longitudinal profile?
No water was present in the stream channel at the time of the as -built survey, therefore,
no water surface is shown on the profile. This has been denoted on the Rocky River
Reach 1 profile plots.
4. Sheet 1.13 — A log sill is shown near PP14 that is not shown in the approved mitigation plan
drawings, and is not colored red to indicate a construction adjustment. Please correct.
The structure shown is included in an existing angled log riffle shown and approved in
the mitigation plan drawings, the additional symbology has been removed to maintain
consistency.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

It
'rk.'6*V
W1LDLANDS
5. Sheet 1.15 —Similar to comment above. A log sill is shown on the first riffle (-506+50) that is not
shown on the mit plan drawings, and is not colored red.
The structure shown is included in an existing angled log riffle shown and approved in
the mitigation plan drawings; the additional symbology has been removed to maintain
consistency.
6. Sheet 1.15 & 1.16 — It appears that the brush toe installed at 508+09 due to the channel
alignment deviation should be colored red.
The brush toe installed at 508+09 due to channel alignment deviation has been noted
and colored red.
7. If any other inconsistencies in the AB drawings are present, please correct, and ensure that
Section 2 of the report is updated.
No other inconsistencies have been found upon comparison of the as -built and
mitigation plan drawings; section 2 of the report has been updated to include the
addition of brush toe at 508+08 due to alignment deviation.
If you have any questions, please contact me by phone [phone], or by email
([e-mail]).
Sincerely,
Jason Lorch, Monitoring Coordinator
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

PREPARED BY:
W
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

LIBERTY ROCK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................1-1
1.1 Project Quantities and Credits...................................................................................................1-1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-2
1.3 Project Attributes.......................................................................................................................1-4
Section 2: As -Built Condition (Baseline)..........................................................................................2-1
2.1 As-Built/Record Drawings..........................................................................................................2-1
2.1.1 Rocky River Reach 1...........................................................................................................2-1
2.1.2 Rocky River Reach 2...........................................................................................................2-1
2.1.3 Rocky River Reach 3...........................................................................................................2-1
2.1.4 Schist Creek........................................................................................................................2-1
2.1.5 Gypsum Creek Reach 2......................................................................................................2-1
2.1.6 Dolomite Creek Reach 2.....................................................................................................2-1
2.1.7 Mica Creek.........................................................................................................................2-1
Section 3: Monitoring Year 0 Data Assessment...............................................................................3-1
3.1 Vegetative Assessment..............................................................................................................3-1
3.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern.....................................................................................................3-1
3.3 Stream Assessment....................................................................................................................3-1
3.4 Stream Areas of Concern...........................................................................................................3-1
3.5 Hydrology Assessment...............................................................................................................3-1
3.6 Wetland Assessment..................................................................................................................3-1
3.7 Monitoring Year 0 Summary......................................................................................................3-2
Section4: METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................4-1
Section5: REFERENCES...................................................................................................................5-1
TABLES
Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits.....................................................................................................1-1
Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements......................................................1-2
Table 3: Project Attributes.........................................................................................................................1-5
FIGURES
Figure 1 Current Condition Plan View Key
Figure la-b Current Condition Plan View
APPENDICES
Appendix A Visual Assessment Data
Table 4 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix B Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final

Appendix C Stream Geomorphology Data
Cross -Section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Table 8 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9 Cross -Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Reachwide and Cross- Section Pebble Count Plots
Appendix D Project Timeline and Contact Info
Table 10 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 11 Project Contact Table
Appendix E Record Drawings
Appendix F Additional Documentation
Soil Boring Descriptions
Lunker Box Installation Photographs
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Liberty Rock Mitigation Site (Site) is located in Randolph County two miles south of the Town of
Liberty and nine miles northwest of Siler City. The Site is located within the Rocky River Headwaters
targeted local watershed (TLW) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030003070010 and the NC Division of
Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin 03-06-12. The Site will provide stream and wetland credits to the Cape
Fear River Basin Cataloging Unit (CU) 03030003 through restoration, enhancement, and preservation of
the Rocky River and four unnamed tributaries to the Rocky River (referred to as Schist Creek, Gypsum
Creek, Dolomite Creek, and Mica Creek for the project) and riparian wetland re-establishment,
rehabilitation, and enhancement. The Site is located on 2 parcels owned by one landowner and a
conservation easement was recorded on 41.12 acres.
1.1 Project Quantities and Credits
The Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator (updated (1/19/2018) was used to determine
final crediting for the "Additional Credit from Extended Buffers" shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits
PROJECT
QUANTITIES
Mitigation
Mitigation
As -Built Mitigation
Restoration
Project Segment Plan
Ratio
Credits Comments
Footage Category
Level
Footage
(X:1)
Stream
Rocky River
Full Channel Restoration, Planted
1,989
2,023
Warm
R
1.0
1,989.000
Reach 1
Buffer, Extended Buffers
Rocky River
Bank Stabilization,
580
585
Warm
El
1.0
580.000
Reach 2
Extended Buffers
Rocky River
Reach 3
479
482
Warm
R
1.0
479.000
Full Channel Restoration, Planted
Buffer, Extended Buffers
Schist Creek
420
476
Warm
R
1.0
420.000
Gypsum Creek
152
152
Warm
P
10.0
15.200
Conservation Easement
Reach 1
Gypsum Creek
Full Channel Restoration, Planted
208
218
Warm
R
1.0
208.000
Reach 2
Buffer, Extended Buffers
Dolomite Creek
188
188
Warm
P
10.0
18.800
Conservation Easement
Reach 1
Dolomite Creek
Minor Bank Grading, Planted
36
31
Warm
Ell
5.0
7.200
Reach 2
Buffer
Full Channel Restoration, Planted
Mica Creek
1,151
1,182
Warm
R
1.0
1,151.000
Buffer, Extended Buffers
Total:
4,868.200
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 1-1

Wetland
Restored Hydrology,
Re-establishment
N/A
12.868
Riverine
R
1
12.868
Planted
Enhanced Hydrology,
Rehabilitation
3.308
3.308
Riverine
RE
1.5
2.205
planted
Enhancement
0.893
0.893
Riverine
RE
5
0.179
Conservation Easement
Total:
15.252
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riverine
Non -
Riverine
Restoration
4,247.000
Enhancement 1
580.000
Enhancement 11
7.200
Preservation
34.000
Additional Credits
from Extended Buffers
274.150
Re-establishment
12.868
Rehabilitation
2.205
Enhancement
0.179
TOTALS
5,142.350
15.252
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits. Table 2 below describes expected
outcomes to water quality and ecological processes and provides project goals and objectives.
Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements
Goal
Objective/
Treatment
Likely Functional
Uplift
Performance
Criteria
Measurement
Cumulative
Monitoring
Results
Entrenchment
ratio over 2.2 for
Cross-section
Construct stream
C/E restoration
monitoring will be
Cross-section
Reduce sediment
assessed during
data meets
Improve the
channels that will
reaches and bank
inputs from bank
MY1, MY2, MY3,
performance
stability of
maintain stable
height ratio below
erosion. Reduce
MYS, and MY7
criteria; all
stream
cross -sections,
shear stress on
1.2 with visual
and visual
Entrenchment
channels.
patterns, and profiles
channel boundary.
assessments
inspections will
Ratios are >2.2
over time.
showing
be performed
and BHR is <1.2.
progression
annually.
towards stability.
Exclude livestock
Livestock have
Exclude
livestock from
through removal of
N/A
N/A
been removed
N/A
livestock from the
from project
streams.
project parcel.
parcel.
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 1-2

Objective/
Likely Functional
Performance
Cumulative
Goal
Treatment
Uplift
Criteria
Measurement
Monitoring
Results
Increase and
Install habitat
diversify available
features such as
habitats for
There is no
performance
Mussel surveys
constructed riffles,
macroinvertebrates,
criteria for this
will take place in
lunker logs, and
fish, mussels, and
Pre -
Improve
brush toes into
amphibians leading
metric. However,
restoration
construction
instream
restored/enhanced
to colonization and
mussel survey
and/or relocation
mussel surveys
habitat.
streams. Add woody
increase in
reports are
reaches in MY1,
completed.
materials to channel
biodiversity over
required
MY2, MY3, MY5,
beds. Construct pools
time. Add complexity
deliverables to
and MY7.
the IRT.
of varying depth.
including LWD to the
streams.
Free groundwater
11 groundwater
Remove livestock to
surface within 12
gauges equipped
allow soil profiles to
Increased surface
inches of the
with pressure
Data will be
Im
Improve
p
stabilize. Remove
water residence time
ground surface
transducers are
collected
wetland
drain effect of
will provide contact
for 12% of the
located in
throughout the
hydrology.
channelized stream
treatment and
growing season
representative
year and
and floodplain
groundwater
under normal
wetland areas
reported in
swales.
recharge potential.
precipitation
and monitored
MY1.
conditions.
annually.
Four bankfull
Allow more frequent
events in separate
flood flows to
years within the
Reconstruct stream
disperse on the
monitoring
Crest and flow
Data will be
Reconnect
channels with
floodplain. Support
period. Thirty
gauges (pressure
collected
channels with
designed bankfull
geomorphology and
days of
transducers)
throughout the
floodplains.
dimensions and
higher -level
continuous flow
recording flow
year and
depth relative to the
functions. Improve
each year on
elevations.
reported in
existing floodplain.
wetland hydrology in
intermittent
MY1.
the Rocky River
streams during
floodplain.
years of normal
precipitation.
Survival rate of
210 planted
One hundred
Reduce sediment
stems per acre at
Plant native tree and
inputs from bank
MY7. Interim
square meter
vegetation plots
understory species in
erosion and runoff.
survival rate of
are placed on 2%
All 19
Restore and
riparian zones and
Increase nutrient
320 planted
of the planted
vegetation
enhance native
plant native shrub
cycling and storage in
stems per acre at
area of the Site
plots have a
floodplain and
and herbaceous
floodplain. Provide
MY3 and 260 at
planted stem
streambank
species on
riparian habitat. Add
MY5. Trees in
and monitored
density greater
vegetation.
streambanks. Treat
a source of LWD and
each plot must
during MY1, MY2,
than 320 stems
MY3, MY5, and
invasive species
organic material to
average 7 ft at
MY7 and assessed
per acre.
within project area.
stream. Support all
MY5 and 10 ft at
visually in MY4
stream functions.
MY7 (excluding
shrub and sub -
and MY6.
canopy species).
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 1-3

Goal
Objective/
Treatment
Likely Functional
Uplift
Performance
Criteria
Measurement
Cumulative
Monitoring
Results
Establish a
conservation
Protect Site from
Visually inspect
easement on the
encroachment on the
Permanently
the perimeter of
Site. Preserve high
riparian corridor and
protect the Site
Prevent easement
the Site to ensure
No easement
quality stream
direct impact to
from harmful
encroachment.
no easement
encroachments.
reaches through the
streams and
uses.
placement of a
wetlands. Support all
encroachment is
conservation
stream functions.
occurring.
easement on site.
1.3 Project Attributes
Five jurisdictional stream channels are located on Site: Rocky River, Schist Creek, Gypsum Creek,
Dolomite Creek, and Mica Creek. As referenced in the Liberty Rock Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan,
historic aerials indicate that on -site streams have existed in their same approximate location for over 75
years, with some changes to the agricultural management of the land. Aerials show that the riparian
buffers for Dolomite, Gypsum, and Schist Creeks have remained undisturbed since prior to 1943. The
riparian buffer of Mica Creek was timbered and converted to agricultural use in the 1960's and the
riparian buffer and floodplain of Rocky River was timbered and converted to agricultural use in the
1980's. The Rocky River was straightened and moved to the south valley edge during that time. Land use
and buffer extents have remained consistent since then. A review of historic imagery for the greater
Rocky River Watershed draining to the Site shows little land use change since 1993 as well. Nearly 4% of
the watershed area is planted pine trees for future harvesting. According to aerial photography, the
most recent logging event occurred between 2006 and 2008 when approximately 75 acres of pines in
the upper watershed were timbered.
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 1-4

Table 3: Project Attributes
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name Liberty Rock County
Randolph County
Mitigation Site
Project Area (acres)
41.12
Project Coordinates
35°49'12.34" N 79°33'43.89" W
PROJECT,.Y
INFORMATION
Cape Fear River
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
USGS HUC 8-digit
03030003
USGS HUC 14-digit
03030003070010
42% Cultivated Crops, 24% Developed,
DWR Sub -basin
03 06 12
Land Use Classification
24% Forest, 5% Shrubland, 3%
Grassland/Herbaceous, 1% Open Water,
1% Wetlands
Project Drainage Area
Percentage of Impervious
(acres)
2,600 6.70%
Area
RESTORATION TRIBUTARY SUMMARY INFORMATION
Parameters
Rocky River Schist Creek Gypsum Creek Dolomite Creek Mica Creek
Pre -project length (feet)
2,652
211
113
44
952
Post -project (feet)
3,090
476
218
31
1,182
Valley confinement
Unconfined
Moderately
confined
Drainage area (acres)
2,600
219
2
7
92
Perennial, Intermittent,
P
P
I
I
P
Ephemeral
DWR Water Quality
Water Supply III
Classification
Dominant Stream
C4
C4/E4
N/A'
N/A'
C4/E4
Classification (existing)
Dominant Stream
C4
C4
C4
N/Az
C4
Classification (proposed)
Dominant Evolutionary
class (Simon) if N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
applicable
WEGULATORY
CONSIDERATIONS
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
USACE Nationwide Permit No. 27
and DWQ401 Water QualityCertification
Water of the United States -Section 401
Yes
Yes
No. 4134.
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Categorical Exclusion in Mitigation
Plan (Wildlands, 2020)
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Coastal Zone Management Act
N/A
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
N/A
1. Gypsum Creek Reach 2 and Dolomite Creek Reach 2 were severely degraded and eroded due to cattle trampling. Cross-
section surveys could not be performed.
2. Source: Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199. Reaches not slated for restoration or
enhancement I were not classified (NC).
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 1-5

Section 2: As -Built Condition (Baseline)
The Site construction and as -built surveys were completed in August 2022 and October 2022
respectively. The survey included developing an as -built topographic surface; as well as surveying the as -
built channel centerlines, top of banks, structures, and cross -sections.
2.1 As-Built/Record Drawings
A sealed half-size set of record drawings are in Appendix E which includes the post -construction survey,
alignments, structures, and monitoring features. A slight adjustment falling within 2 feet of design was
made on Mica Creek due to the presence of bedrock. No other significant field adjustments were made
during construction, the adjustments made during construction were minimal, made only where
needed, and were based on field evaluations. They are listed below.
2.1.1 Rocky River Reach 1
• STA 101+48 — STA 101+86 — Added rock to existing riffle.
• STA 102+05 — STA 102+69 — Vegetative soil lift replaced with brushtoe for increased channel
stability.
• STA 112+41— STA 113+31— Vegetative soil lift replaced with brushtoe for increased channel
stability.
2.1.2 Rocky River Reach 2
• STA 123+26 — STA 123+64 — Streambank stability was achieved by grading instead of installing
vegetative soil lift.
2.1.3 Rocky River Reach 3
• STA 126+95 — STA 127+36 — Vegetative soil lift replaced with brushtoe for increased channel
stability.
2.1.4 Schist Creek
• No significant changes made.
2.1.5 Gypsum Creek Reach 2
• No significant changes made.
2.1.6 Dolomite Creek Reach 2
• STA 401+88 — STA 402+33 — Realigned during construction due to slight change in Rocky River
from initial survey.
2.1.7 Mica Creek
• STA 508+09 — STA 509+04 — Alignment changed due to bedrock.
• STA 508+09 — STA 509+04 — Brushtoe added for stabilization.
• STA 509+08 — STA 509+29 — Brushtoe added for stabilization.
• STA 510+69 — STA 511+00 — Brushtoe added for stabilization.
• STA 511+27 — STA 511+45 — Brushtoe added for stabilization.
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 2-1

Section 3: Monitoring Year 0 Data Assessment
The vegetation and stream success criteria for the Site follow the approved success criteria presented in
the Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2021). Performance criteria for vegetation, stream, and hydrologic
assessment are located in Section 1.2 Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional
Improvements.
3.1 Vegetative Assessment
The MYO vegetative survey was completed in January 2023. Vegetation monitoring resulted in a stem
density range of 526 to 688 planted stems per acre which is well above the interim requirement of 320
stems per acre required at MY3. Average stem density across all vegetation plots was 594 planted stems
per acre. All 19 vegetation plots met the interim success criteria and are on track to meet the final
success criteria required for MY7. Herbaceous groundcover has become established across the site.
Refer to Appendix A for Vegetation Plot Photographs and the Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
and Appendix B for Vegetation Plot Data.
3.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
Vegetation management and herbicide treatments were applied prior to construction in sporadic areas
of existing forested areas to prevent the spread of invasive species that could potentially compete with
planted native species. Throughout March -June 2021, multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), and parrot feather (Myriophyllum aquaticum) were treated physically and
chemically. Scattered populations of blackberry (Rubus spp.) were also present on the site and treated
prior to construction. Wildlands recognizes that multiple treatments are typically needed for effective
invasive plant control. Supplemental treatments were applied monthly post -construction throughout
August -December 2022. Additional physical and chemical removal is planned for spring 2023. These
areas will be monitored and retreated as necessary.
3.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MYO were conducted in October 2022. All streams on Site are stable and
functioning as designed. Streams show only minor deviations from design and visual assessments show
streams remain stable. Cross -sections show entrenchment and width -to -depth ratios within an
acceptable range of the design parameters, and bank height ratios are less than 1.2. Refer to Appendix A
for the Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table and Stream Photographs. Refer to
Appendix C for Stream Geomorphology Data.
3.4 Stream Areas of Concern
No stream areas of concern were identified, all streams are stable and functioning as intended.
3.5 Hydrology Assessment
Two crest gauges were installed, one on Rocky River Reach 2 (Enhancement 1) and another on Mica
Creek. An additional crest gauge was installed on Rocky River Reach 1 in MY1 to better reflect the
interaction of flow conditions within the restored portion of the site. One flow gauge was installed on
Gypsum Creek. Stream gauge data will be collected quarterly, and hydrologic data will be reported
during MY1.
3.6 Wetland Assessment
Eleven groundwater gauges were installed in wetlands across the Site. These gauges will be monitored
quarterly to observe wetland hydrology and determine if they meet success criteria. Groundwater gauge
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 3-1

data will be collected and reported during MY1. Soil profile data has been recorded near each
groundwater well and included in Appendix F.
3.7 Monitoring Year 0 Summary
Overall, the Site looks great, is performing as intended, and is on course to meet success criteria.
Vegetation plot data shows an average density of 594 planted stems per acre across plots. All vegetation
plots are on track to exceed the MY3 interim requirement of 320 planted stems per acre. All project
streams are stable, functioning as intended, and meeting project goals. Stream and wetland hydrology
data will be included in the MY1 annual report. Invasive species were treated prior to construction and
again after construction. Invasive species will continue to be assessed and treated as necessary in future
monitoring years.
Summary information and data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. All raw data supporting the tables and
figures in the appendices are available from DIMS upon request.
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 3-2

Section 4: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). All Integrated Current Condition Mapping was recorded
using an EOS Arrow handheld GPS with sub -meter accuracy and processed using ArcPro. Pressure
transducers were installed in riffle cross -sections and monitored throughout the year. Hydrologic
monitoring instrument installation and monitoring methods are in accordance with the United States
Army Corps of Engineers standards (USACE, 2003) and the North Carolina Interagency Review Team
Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update (NCIRT, 2016). Vegetation monitoring protocols
followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008).
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 4-1

Section 5: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration, A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C; Rawlins, C.L.; Potyondy, John P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., Roberts, S.D., & Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
Version 4.2.
North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi, Pages
12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-DWQ,
USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey. 1998. North Carolina Geology.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2021. Liberty Rock Mitigation Site - Final Mitigation Plan. DMS,
Raleigh, NC.
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - Final 5-1

r I Conservation Easement Stream Approach
L__._
Wetland Approach Stream Restoration
® Wetland Re -Establishment Stream Enhancement I
Wetland Rehabilitation Stream Enhancement 11
Wetland Enhancement
� Stream Preservation
® Wetland Not for Credit/No Treatment
� Not for Credit Stream
Fixed Vegetation Plot
� Stream Design Deviation
ORandom Vegetation Plot
Non -Project Streams
q WILD LAND 5
ENGINEERING
Unpaved Access Road
Existing Culvert
DOT Right of Way
Railroad Right of Way
Railroad
Cross -Section (XS)
Q Photo Point (PP)
Groundwater Well Gauge (GWG)
Crest Gauge
Flow Gauge
Barotroll
Soil Temperature Probe
Reach Break
Q
Property Access Point
Reach 1
Rocky River
Reach 2
?ek
o �
Reach 1
-��_ ypsum Creek
O
o.
Reach 1
0 200 400 Feet
I i I i I
IN
A
Figure 1. Current Condition Plan View Key
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Randolph County, NC

Conservation Easement
Wetland Approach
Wetland Re -Establishment
Wetland Rehabilitation
Wetland Enhancement
Stream Approach
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Preservation
Not for Credit Stream
Existing Culvert
DOT Right of Way
Cross -Section (XS)
Photo Point (PP)
Groundwater Well Gauge (GWG)
I - l mobil
,,-
OWN
NNo
v _
�WW3
%toWILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
Reach 1
Figure 1a. Current Condition Plan View
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
0 100 200 Feet DMS Project No. 100135
I I I I I Monitoring Year 0- 2023
Randolph County, NC

at
i
Reach 1
Conservation Easement
Wetland Approach
® Wetland Re -Establishment
Wetland Rehabilitation
Wetland Not for Credit/No Treatment
Fixed Vegetation Plot
ORandom Vegetation Plot
Stream Approach
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Not for Credit Stream
Stream Design Deviation
Non -Project Streams
Structure
— — • Top of Bank
Existing Culvert
===== Unpaved Access Road
uge (GWG)
)e
_V i
L8 11L% %
10
6-7, WILDLANDS
%4�0 ENGINEERING
x r-Wig
, 4t
IR
Figure 1b. Current Condition Plan View
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
P DMS Project No. 100135
0 100 200 Feet Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Randolph County, NC

APPENDIX A. Visual Assessment Data

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Rockv River Reaches 1-3
Number Total Amount of
Major Channel Category Metric Stable . , Number Ji Unstable
M�Muilt Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
3,090
Assessed Bank Length
6,180
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank
Toe Erosion
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
0
100%
habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
1
1
100%
Structure
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
21
21
100510
Schist Creek
Number Total Amount of
annel Category Metric Stable . , Number in Unstable
Performing As -BA Footage
7 as Intended L A
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Lntended
476
Assessed Bank Length
952
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank
Toe Erosion
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
0
100%
habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Structure
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Gvpsum Creek Reach 2
Number Total Amount of
Major Channel Category Metric Stable . , Number Ji Unstable
M�Muilt Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
218
Assessed Bank Length
436
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank
Toe Erosion
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
0
100%
habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
2
2
100%
Structure
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
7
7
100510
Mica Creek
Number Total Amount of
Channel Category Metric Stable . , Number in Unstable
Performing As -BA Footage
7 as Intended L AN
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
1,182
Assessed Bank Length
2,364
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank
Toe Erosion
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
0
100%
habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
6
6
100%
Structure
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
19
19
100%

Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Planted Acreaee 23.70
Vegetation Catego
INV
Mapping
Definitions Threshold
L (ac)
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. 0.10
Combined
Acreage
0.00
%ofPlanted
Acreage
0.00
Bare Areas
Low Stem Density
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on current MY stem count
0.10
0.00
0.00
Areas
criteria.
Total
0.0
0%
Areas of Poor Growth
Planted areas where average height is not meeting current MY Performance
0.10
0.00
0.00
Rates
Standard.
Cumulative Totall
0.0
1 0%
Easement Acreage 41.12
Invasives may occur outside of planted areas and within the easement and will
therefore be calculated against the total easement acreage. Include species with the
Invasive Areas of
potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term or 0.10 0.00 0.00
Concern
community structure for existing communities. Invasive species included in
summation above should be identified in report summary.
Encroachment may be point, line, or polygon. Encroachment to be mapped consists
Easement
of any violation of restrictions specified in the conservation easement. Common
0 Encroachments Noted
Encroachment Areas
encroachments are mowing, cattle access, vehicular access. Encroachment has no
none
/ 0 ac
threshold value as will need to be addressed regardless of impact area.

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTO POINT 1 Rocky River RI — upstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 1 Rocky River RI — downstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 2 Rocky River RI — upstream (812212022) 1 PHOTO POINT 2 Rocky River RI — downstream (812212022) 1
PHOTO POINT 3 Rocky River R1— upstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 3 Rocky River R1— downstream (812212022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 4 Rocky River RI — upstream (812212022) 1 PHOTO POINT 4 Rocky River RI — downstream (812212022) 1
PHOTO POINT 5 Rocky River R1— upstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 6 Rocky River R2 — upstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 5 Rocky River RI — downstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 6 Rocky River R2 — downstream (812212022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 7 Rocky River R2 — upstream (812212022) 1 PHOTO POINT 7 Rocky River R2 — downstream (812212022) 1
PHOTO POINT 8 Rocky River R3 — upstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 9 Schist Creek — upstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 8 Rocky River R3 — downstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 9 Schist Creek — downstream (812212022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 10 Schist Creek — upstream (812212022) 1 PHOTO POINT 10 Schist Creek — downstream (812212022) 1
PHOTO POINT 11 Gypsum Creek RI — upstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 12 Gypsum Creek R2 — upstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 11 Gypsum Creek R1 —downstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 12 Gypsum Creek R2 — downstream (812212022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 13 Dolomite Creek Ri — upstream (812212022) 1 PHOTO POINT 13 Dolomite Creek R1 —downstream (812212022) 1
PHOTO POINT 14 Mica Creek — upstream (812212022) 1 PHOTO POINT 14 Mica Creek — downstream (812212022) 1
LPHOTO POINT 15 Mica Creek — upstream (812212022)
PHOTO POINT 15 Mica Creek —downstream (812212022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 16 Mica Creek — upstream (812212022) 1 PHOTO POINT 16 Mica Creek — downstream (812212022) 1
PHOTO POINT 17 Mica Creek — upstream (812212022)
.. r
PHOTO POINT 17 Mica Creek — downstream (812212022)
Lunker Box Installation (810412022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS

FIXED VEG PLOT 1 (0111212023) 1 FIXED VEG PLOT 2 (0111212023) 1
FIXED VEG PLOT 3 (0111212023)
FIXED VEG PLOT 5 (0111212023)
FIXED VEG PLOT 4 (0111212023)
FIXED VEG PLOT 6 (0111212023)
ok Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Vegetation Plot Photographs

FIXED VEG PLOT 7 (0111212023)
FIXED VEG PLOT 8 (0111212023)
FIXED VEG PLOT 9 (0111212023) 1 FIXED VEG PLOT 10 (0111212023) 1
FIXED VEG PLOT 11(0111212023)
FIXED VEG PLOT 12 (0111212023)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Vegetation Plot Photographs

FIXED VEG PLOT 13 (0111212023)
FIXED VEG PLOT 15 (0111212023)
FIXED VEG PLOT 14 (0111212023)
ok Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Vegetation Plot Photographs

RANDOM VEG PLOT 16 (0111212023) 1 RANDOM VEG PLOT 17 (0111212023) 1
RANDOM VEG PLOT 18 (0111212023) I RANDOM VEG PLOT 19 (0111212023)
ok Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data —Vegetation Plot Photographs

APPENDIX B. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Data
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Planted Acreage 26.50
Date of Initial Plant 2023-01-06
Date of Current Survey 2023-01-12
Plot size (ACRES) 0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/
Shrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 1 F
Veg Plot 2 F
Veg Plot 3 F
Veg Plot 4 F
Veg Plot 5 F
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
FAC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Tree
FACW
1
1
1
1
1
1
Asimina triloba*
pawpaw
Tree
FAC
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
1
1
2
2
3
3
5
5
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
FACW
Cephalanthus occidentalis*
buttonbush
Shrub
OBL
2
2
2
2
1
1
Corpus amomum*
silky dogwood
Shrub
FACW
Species
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
Included in
Approved
Euonymus americanus*
strawberry bush
Shrub
FAC
Mitigation Plan
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
OBL
2
2
1
1
2
2
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
FACW
1
1
2
2
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FACW
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
FACU
Salix nigra*
blackwillow
Tree
OBL
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
Sambucus canadensis*
American black elderberry
Tree
FACW
1
1
1
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
FAC
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
Sumsoff
Performance Standard
15
15
16
16
14
14
14
14
14
14
Current Year Stem Couni
15
16
14
14
14
Stems/Acre
648
567
567
567
Mitigation Plan
Species Count
10
8
7
8
Performance
Standard
Dominant Species Composition (%)
2
19
21
29
36
Average Plot Height (ft.)1
2
2
3
2
%Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
Current Year Stem Count
15
16
14
14
14
Post Mitigation
Stems/Acre
607
648
597
567
567
Plan
Species Count
10
10
8
7
8
Performance
Dominant Species Composition (%)
20
19
21
29
36
Standard
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
2
3
2
%Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
*Species not subject to monitoring height requirement due to species growth habit.
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation
plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized). 3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance
Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Data
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Planted Acreage 26.50
Date of Initial Plant 2023-01-06
Date of Current Survey 2023-01-12
Plot size (ACRES) 0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/
Shrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 6 F
Veg Plot 7 F
Veg Plot 8 F
Veg Plot 9 F
Veg Plot 10 F
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
FAC
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Tree
FACW
2
2
1
1
2
2
Asimina triloba*
pawpaw
Tree
FAC
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
FACW
Cephalanthus occidentalis*
buttonbush
Shrub
OBL
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
Corpus amomum*
silky dogwood
Shrub
FACW
Species
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
Included in
Approved
Euonymus americanus*
strawberry bush
Shrub
FAC
Mitigation Plan
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
OBL
1
1
3
3
2
2
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
FACW
3
3
1
1
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FACW
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
FACU
Salix nigra*
blackwillow
Tree
OBL
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Sambucus canadensis*
American black elderberry
Tree
FACW
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
FAC
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
Sum
I JL Performance Standard
15
15
14
14
15
15
15
15
16
16
Current Year Stem Count
15
14
15
15
16
Stems/Acre
567
607
607
648
Mitigation Plan
Species Count
7
10
9
9
10
Performance
Standard
Dominant Species Composition (%)
20
21
20
13
12
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
3
3
3
% Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
Current Year Stem Count
15
14
15
15
16
Post Mitigation
Stems/Acre
607
567
607
607
648
Plan
Species Count
7
10
9
9
10
Performance
Dominant Species Composition (%)
20
21
20
13
12
Standard
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
3
3
3
% Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
*Species not subject to monitoring height requirement due to species growth habit.
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation
plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized). 3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance
Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Data
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Planted Acreage 26.50
Date of Initial Plant 2023-01-06
Date of Current Survey 2023-01-12
Plot size (ACRES) 0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/
Shrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 11 F
Veg Plot 12 F
Veg Plot 13 F
Veg Plot 14 F
Veg Plot 15 F
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
FAC
1
1
2
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Tree
FACW
Asimina triloba*
pawpaw
Tree
FAC
1
1
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
3
3
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
FACW
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis*
buttonbush
Shrub
OBL
Corpus amomum*
silky dogwood
Shrub
FACW
Species
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
Included in
Approved
Euonymus americanus*
strawberry bush
Shrub
FAC
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
Mitigation Plan
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
OBL
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
FACW
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FACW
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
FACU
1
1
Salix nigra*
blackwillow
Tree
OBL
Sambucus canadensis*
American black elderberry
Tree
FACW
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
FAC
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
Sum
Performance Standard
15
15
15
15
17
17
15
15
13
13
Current Year Stem Count
15
15
17
15
13
Stems/Acre
607
688
607
526
Mitigation Plan
Species Count
8
8
9
8
Performance
Standard
Dominant Species Composition (%)
1
20
18
20
23
Average Plot Height (ft.)1
2
2
2
2
% Invasives
0
1
0
0
0
0
Current Year Stem Count
15
15
i7
15
13
Post Mitigation
Stems/Acre
07
607
688
607
526
Plan
Species Count10
L
8
8
9
8
Performance
Dominant Species Composition (%)
13
20
18
20
23
Standard
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
2
2
2
% Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
*Species not subject to monitoring height requirement due to species growth habit.
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation
plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized). 3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance
Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Data
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Planted Acreage 26.50
Date of Initial Plant 2023-01-06
Date of Current Survey 2023-01-12
Plot size (ACRES) 0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/
Shrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 16 R
Veg Plot 17 R
Veg Plot 18 R
Veg Plot 19 R
Total
Total
Total
Total
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
FAC
1
1
2
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Tree
FACW
Asimina triloba*
pawpaw
Tree
FAC
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
4
4
3
2
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
FACW
Cephalanthus occidentalis*
buttonbush
Shrub
OBL
Corpus amomum*
silky dogwood
Shrub
FACW
1
Species
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
1
Included in
Approved
Euonymus americanus*
strawberry bush
Shrub
FAC
1
1
Mitigation Plan
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
3
2
2
2
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
OBL
2
2
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
FACW
1
1
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FACW
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
FACU
2
1
Salix nigra*
blackwillow
Tree
OBL
1
2
Sambucus canadensis*
American black elderberry
Tree
FACW
1
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
FAC
2
1
1
Sum
Performance Standard
15
15
13
13
Current Year Stem Coun
15
15
13
13
Stems/Acre
607
607
526
5
Mitigation Plan
Species Count
9
8
8
10
Performance
Standard
Dominant Species Composition (%)
27
27
23
15
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
3
% Invasives
Current Year Stem Coun
15
0
15
0
13
0
13
Post Mitigation
Stems/Acre
607
607
526
526
Plan
Species Count
9
8
8
10
Performance
Dominant Species Composition (%)
27
27
23
15
Standard
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
3
2
2
% Invasives
0
*Species not subject to monitoring height requirement due to species growth habit.
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation
plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized). 3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance
Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Table 7. Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DIMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Veg Plot 1 F
Veg Plot 2 F
Veg Plot 3 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
607
2
10
0
648
2
10
0
567
2
8
0
Veg Plot 4 F
Veg Plot 5 F
Veg Plot 6 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
567
3
8
0
567
2
8
0
607
2
7
0
Veg Plot 7 F
Veg Plot 8 F
Veg Plot 9 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
567
2
10
0
607
3
9
0
607
3
9
0
Veg Plot 10 F
Veg Plot 11 F
Veg Plot 12 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
3
10
0
607
2
10
0
607
2
8
0
Veg Plot 13 F
Veg Plot 14 F
Veg Plot 15 F
Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft)** # Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
688
2
8
0
607
9
26
2
8
0
*Each monitoring year represents a different plot for the random vegetation plot "groups". Random plots are denoted with an R, and fixed plots with an F.
**Species not subject to monitoring height requirement due to species growth habit are not included in height calculations.

Table 7. Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Veg Plot 16 R
Veg Plot 17 R
Veg Plot 18 R
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)**
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
607
2
9
0
6
3
8
0
526
2
8
0
Veg Plot 19 R
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)** # Species % Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
*Each monitoring year represents a different plot for the random vegetation plot "groups". Random plots are denoted with an R, and fixed plots with an F.
**Species not subject to monitoring height requirement due to species growth habit are not included in height calculations.

APPENDIX C. Stream Geomorphology Data

Cross -Section Plots

674
c
W_ 672
7
W
LlJ
670
Cross -Section 1 - Rocky River Reach 1 (Pool)
20 40 50
Distance (ft.)
-� MY 0 - - Bankfull Elevation - Based on As -Boil[ Bankfull Area
-- Current Low Top of Bank
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
N/A
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
N/A
Thalweg Elevation
669.63
LTOB Elevation
673.16
LTOB Max Depth
3.53
1
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
107.09
Downstream (0811912022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data — Cross -Section Plots

674
c
672
9
m
w
670
Cross -Section 2 - Rocky River Reach 1 (Riffle)
20 40 50
Distance (ft.)
-� MY 0 - - Bankfull Elevation - Based on As -Boil[ Bankfull Area
— Current Low Top of Bank
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
673.41
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
671.25
LTOB Elevation
673.41
LTOB Max Depth
2.16
1
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
38.51
r
P 41
�
l
Downstream (0811912022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data — Cross -Section Plots

67?
Gio
C
7
W
LU 668
666
Crass -Section 3 - Rocky River Reach 1 (Riffle)
n 20 40 50
Distance (ft.)
MY 0 - - Bankfull Elevation - Based on As -Built Bankfull Area
Current Low Top of Bank
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
670.49
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
668.06
LTOB Elevation
670.49
LTOB Max Depth
2.43
1
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
41.72
'AWL;,
y 6 vK
Downstream (0811912022)
r Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data —Cross-Section Plots

MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
N/A
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
N/A
Thalweg Elevation
665.88
LTOB Elevation
669.97
LTOB Max Depth
4.09
1
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
100.78
Downstream (0811912022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data — Cross -Section Plots

7
W
LU 666
M4
Gross -Section 5 -Rocky River Reach 2 (Riffle)
n 20 40 Fp
Distance (ft.)
MY 6 - - Bankfull Elevation - Based on As -Built Bankfull Area
— Current Low Top of Bank
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
667.70
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
1.19
Thalweg Elevation
665.39
LTOB Elevation
668.15
LTOB Max Depth
2.76
1
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
50.63
Downstream (0811912022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data — Cross -Section Plots

666
m
7
_m
LU 664
662
Cross -Section 6 - Rocky River Reach 3 (Riffle)
20 40 50
Distance (ft.)
- MY 0 - - Bankfull Elevation - Based on As -Built Bankfull Area
Current Low Top of Bank
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
666.63
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
663.81
LTOB Elevation
666.63
LTOB Max Depth
2.82
1
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
44.03
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data — Cross -Section Plots

Crass -Section 7 - Schist Creek (Riffle)
674
0 672
W
LLJ
670
n 20 40 t;Cs
Distance (ft.)
MY 0 — — Bankfull Elevation - Based on As•Bull[ Bankfull Area
Current Law Top of Bank
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
673.50
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
671.62
LTOB Elevation
673.50
LTOB Max Depth
1.88
1
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
14.01
Downstream (0811912022)
r Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data —Cross-Section Plots

672
C
6;0
7
W
LU
E66
Crass -Section 8 - Gypsum Creek Reach 2 (Riffle)
20 40 60
Distance (ft.)
-� MY 0 - - Bankfull Elevation -Based an As -Built Bankfull Area
— Current Low Fop of Bank
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
670.42
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
669.38
LTOB Elevation
670.42
LTOB Max Depth
1.04
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
5.42
Downstream (0811912022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data — Cross -Section Plots

M
Cross -Section 9 - Mica Creek (Riffle)
20 40 50
Distance (ft.)
-� MY 0 - - Bankfull Elevation -Based on As -Built Bankfull Area
— Current Low Fop of Bank
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
670.34
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
669.58
LTOB Elevation
670.34
LTOB Max Depth
0.75
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
3.29
Downstream (0812212022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data — Cross -Section Plots

Lu 666
666
Cross -Section 10 - Mica Creek (Pool)
20 40 60
Distance (ft.)
- MY 0 - - Bankfull Elevation -Based on As -Built Bankfull Area
— Current Low Top of Bank
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
N/A
Bank Height Ratio - Based
on AB-Bankfull Area
N/A
Thalweg Elevation
667.60
LTOB Elevation
669.70
LTOB Max Depth
2.11
LTOB Cross Sectional Area
9.62
Downstream (0812212022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix C: Stream Geomorphology Data — Cross -Section Plots

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DIMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Kiver Keacn 115 to IUl+L4 tO
680
675
v
0
w 670
665
10100
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10150 10200
tTW (MYO-10/2022)
)water present in channel at the time of survey, water surface not shown.
680
675
w
c
0
0 670
665
10600
10250 10300 10350 10400 10450 10500
Station (feet)
WSF (MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-10/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYU30/2022)
10550 10600
1
1F,_1
1 x
1
1
1
1
' •• •
1
•♦ • ' ♦ ♦
•
i ♦ A
• .
•'
♦• r &A
' • • •
• ♦
' '
1
•
• ♦'
♦ •
♦
♦
♦
• • • ♦
• • A A♦
♦ ♦♦♦
♦♦♦
1
1
1
1
10650 10700
TW (MYO-10/2022)
*No water present in channel at the time of survey, water surface not shown.
**No structures present in As -Built design.
10750 10800 10850 10900 10950 11000
Station (feet)
WSF (MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-10/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYU30/2022)
11050 11100

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DIMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Kiver Keacn 1151A 111+UU tO
675
670
w
w
c
0
0 665
660
11100
♦
♦ • ♦ :
r M , ♦ ♦
♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦
♦ ♦• ♦♦ ♦
♦♦ ♦
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦
&A i
11150 11200
tTW (MYO-30/2022)
*No water present in channel at the time of survey, water surface not shown.
**No structures present in As -Built design.
Rocky River Reach 1(STA 116+00 to 121+00)
11250 11300 11350 11400 11450 11500
Station (feet)
WSF (MYO-30/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO-30/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-30/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO-30/2022)
11550 11600
675
670
♦ ♦
**No structures present in As -Built design.

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DIMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
ruver Keacn L tJ IA IZI?UU LO
675
670
v
0
w 665
660
12100
Y L
X
I
Iv
;
m C
�♦ ♦ ♦
♦
♦ ♦♦
i ♦ ♦♦
I
I
♦
______
I
•
I
I
12150 12200
-TW (MYO-10/2022)
**No structures present in As -Built design.
KIVer Keach 3 (S I A 1Lb+UU to
670
665
w
0
w 660
655
12600
12250 12300 12350 12400 12450 12500
Station (feet)
WSF(MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB(MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB(MYO-10/2022) • STRUCFURE(MYO-30/2022)
12550 12600
11 IF._1
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ -I - ♦ ♦ ♦ ' X
-------------------
I I
I
Y L I
ii
I
I
12650 12700 12750 12800 12850 12900 12950 13000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF (MYO-30/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO-30/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-30/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO-30/2022)
**No structures present in As -Built design.
13050 13100
12650 12700 12750 12800 12850 12900 12950 13000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF (MYO-30/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO-30/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-30/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO-30/2022)
**No structures present in As -Built design.
13050 13100

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
bcniSL creeK (b I [UU+/U to
680
675
v
O
m 670
665
20000
680
675
m
m
`o
m 670
665
20300
a
V
I
^
I x
O
C
♦
♦
iU
m
♦
I
♦ • ♦ •
•♦ ♦ ♦ • Y i ♦♦
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ &A
♦ ♦ •
AA
I
I
I
I
20050 20100 20150 20200 20250
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF (MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-10/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO-10/2022)
20300
--------------------------
----�-
----
----------------------------
----- -___
_______________________________________--------
__--- _---
"-1
20350 20400 20450 20500 20550
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF(MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB(MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB(MYO-10/2022) 0 STRUCTURE(MYU30/2022)
20600

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Gypsum Creek Reach 2 (STA 301+52 to 303+70)
675
670
ii
w 665
660
30100 30150 30200 30250 30300 30350 30400
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF (MYO-10/2022) LBKFATOB (MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-30/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO-10/2022)
I
I
I
ro
x
I
I
I
I
E
I
�
I
I
I
I
I

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
mica creeK 151A bU[+UU to
685
680
v
`o
m 675
670
50000
685
680
m
w
Y
m 675
670
50300
♦♦ •
I
•' •
i
_- • i
Y • •
- -----A----- -----
---------J---------- ♦♦ ♦♦
--_-_
♦ ♦ AA A
---
a
u
I
m
50050 50100 50150 50200 50250
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF (MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-10/2022) O STRUCTURE (MYO-10/2022)
50300
1
50350 50400 50450 50500 50550
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF(MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB(MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB(MYO-10/2022) 0 STRUCTURE(MYU30/2022)
50600

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
mica creeK (JIA bULT+UU to
680
675
v
0
w 670
665
50600
680
675
w
w
m 670
665
50900
As A • ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦ •
-
! ♦ •♦ •lk ♦• •
--------------------------------
♦ r • t • ► i
1 AA
-------------------------------
----
- ----------
---------------
50650 50700 50750 50800 50850
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF (MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-10/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO-10/2022)
50900
1 O1
1m
1 0
1 x
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
♦♦
♦
••
•
1
1
1
♦
Y
•
------------------------------
- --- -
,� ♦
♦
•
♦♦
•
•
---------------------------
1
1
1
1
50950 51000 51050 51100 51150
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF(MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB(MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB(MYO-10/2022) 0 STRUCTURE(MYU30/2022)
51200

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Mica Creek (STA 512+00 to 513+53)
675
670
v
0
v 665
660
51200 51250 51300 51350 51400 51450 51500
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-10/2022)------- WSF (MYO-10/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO-10/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO-10/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO-10/2022)

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Parameter
MONITORING
CONDITIONSDESIGN •
Rocky River Reach 1
Riffle Only
Min I Max
n
Min I Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
21.6
2
28.0
30.6
1 30.7
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
200.0
2
>100.0
200.0
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
2
1.6
1.3
1.4
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.8
2
2.5
2.2
2.4
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
35.7
2
45.5
38.5
41.7
2
Width/Depth Ratio
12.7
2
17.2
22.4
24.2
2
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
2
>2.2
6.5
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
2
1.0
1.0
2
Max particle size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
19.0
60.0
12.0 13.0
2
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
110.0 1 121.0
2
110.0
94.1 107.2 2
Sinuosity
1.10
2
1.26
1.26
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0010 0.0090
2
0.0010 1 0.0050
---Z
Other
---
---
Parameter
Rocky River Reach 21
Riffle Only
Min Max
n
Min I Max
Min Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
22.8
1
N/A
22.4
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
200.0
1
>20.0
200.0
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.1
1
N/A
1.8
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.0
1
N/A
2.3
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
48.1
1
N/A
50.7
1
Width/Depth Ratio
12.6
1
N/A
12.8
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
1
N/A
8.9
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1
N/A
1.2
1
Max particle size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
11.0
N/A
8.0
Rosgen Classification
C4
N/A
C4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
110.0 1 121.0
1
N/A
83.3
Sinuosity
1.00
1
N/A
1.09
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0010 1 0.0090
1
N/A
0.0027
Other
---
--
Restoration activities along Rocky River Reach 2 were limited to bank grading and stabilization. No work was done on the channel bed per agreement with
USFWS and WRC on potential impact to on -site mussels. Design parameters were not used on this reach.
2Water Surface not recorded, no water present in channel at time of as -built survey.

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Parameter
MONITORING
DESIGN
• •
Rocky River Reach 3
Riffle Only
Min I Max
n
Min I Max
Min I Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.1
1
26.0
22.5
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
200.0
1
>100.0
200.0
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.3
1
1.9
1.6
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.9
1
3.0
2.5
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
41.4
1
49.0
44.0
1
Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
1
13.8
14.4
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
1
>2.2
8.9
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1
Max particle size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
12.0
55.0
17.0
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
110.0
121.0
1
128.0
105.7
Sinuosity
1.00
1.10
1
1.10
1.10
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)Z
0.0010
0.0090
1
0.0020
0.0002
Other
---
--
Parameter
Schist Creek
Riffle Only
Min I Max
n
Min I Max
Min I Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.2
1
12.8
24.4
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
75.0
1
>75.0
75.0
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
1
1.0
0.6
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.8
1
1.5
1.9
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
10.4
1
12.5
14.0
1
Width/Depth Ratio
12.4
1
13.0
38.7
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
1
>2.2
3.1
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.2
1
1.0
1.0
1
Max particle size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
7.0
62.0
3.0
Rosgen Classification
C4/E4
C4
C4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
20.9
1
31.0
17.2
Sinuosity
1.00
1
1.17
1.17
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0000 1 0.0010
1
0.0060 1 0.0170
0.0038
Other
--

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Parameter
Gypsum Creek Reach 23
Riffle Only
Min Max
n
Min I Max
Min Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
8.7
8.3
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
>100.0
100.0
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
0.5
0.7
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
---
---
0.8
1.0
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
---
---
2.9
5.4
1
Width/Depth Ratio
---
---
13.0
12.7
1
Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
>2.2
12.1
1
Bank Height Ratio
---
---
1.0
1.0
1
Max particle size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
31.0
12.0
Rosgen Classification
---
C4
C4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
4.0
11.7
Sinuosity
1.00
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0001 0.0100 1
0.0096
0.0057
Other
---
---
---
Parameter
Mica Creek
Riffle Only
Min Max
n
Min I Max
Min I Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.6
1
8.7
7.5
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
1
>50.0
50.0
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
1
0.7
0.4
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1
1.0
0.8
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
4.9
1
5.7
3.3
1
Width/Depth Ratio
9.4
1
13.0
17.3
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
1
>2.2
6.6
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.7
1
1.0
1.0
1
Max particle size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
25.0
79.0
24.0
Rosgen Classification
C4/E4
C4
C4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
20.1
16.0
9.5
Sinuosity
1.00
1.12
1.18
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.00901 0.0150 1
0.0140
0.0138
Other
---
---i
---
'Gypsum Creek Pre-Exisiting Conditions data not recorded.

Table 9. Cross -Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Cross -Section 1 (Pool) Cross -Section 2 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 3 (Riffle) Cross -Section 4 (Pool)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
I MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft) -Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
N/A
673.41
670.49
N/A
Bank Height Ratio -Based on AB Bankfull' Area
N/A
1.00
1.00
N/A
Thalweg Elevation
669.63
671.25
668.06
665.88
LTOB 2 Elevation
673.16
673.41
670.49
669.97
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
3.53
2.16
2.43
4.09
F__ LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
107.09
1
1 38.511
-kocky
1
1
00.78
Rocky River ��
Cross -Section 5 (Riffle)
River Rea��
Cross -Section 6 (Riffle)
Jh_ Schist Creek
Cross -Section 7 (Riffle)
Gypsum Creek
Cross -Section 8 (Riffle)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
667.70
666.63
673.50
670.42
Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.19
1.00
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
665.39
663.81
671.62
669.38
LTOB 2 Elevation
668.15
666.63
673.50
670.42
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
2.76
2.82
1.88
1.04
LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
50.63
44.03
14.0
T 5.42
Cross -Section 9 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 10 (Pool)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
670.34
N/A
Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
N/A
Thalweg Elevation
669.58
667.60
LTOB2 Elevation
670.34
669.70
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
0.75
2.11
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft Z
3.29
9.62
'Bank Height Ratio (BHR) takes the As -built ban kfuI area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years ban kfuII elevation.
2LTOB Area and Max depth -These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey (The same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation). Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and tracked for each year as above. The difference between the LTOB elevation
and the thalweg elevation (same as in the BHR calculation) will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Rocky River Reach 1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
3
20
23
23
23
SP�O
Very fine
0.062
0.125
13
13
13
36
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
9
10
10
46
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
4
5
5
51
Coarse
0.5
1.0
51
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
51
GQQ
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
51
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
51
Fine
4.0
5.6
51
Fine
5.6
1 8.0
51
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
2
2
53
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
2
3
3
56
Coarse
16.0
22.6
5
5
5
61
Coarse
22.6
32
7
7
7
68
Very Coarse
32
45
8
1
1 8
8
76
Very Coarse
45
64
10
1
11
11
87
Small
64
90
5
5
5
92
Sma
Largee
128
180
2
2
2
99
Large
180
256
99
Small
256
362
99
Small
362
512
1
1
1
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 -
0.12
D50 =
0.4
D80. =
58.1
D95 =
111.2
D100 =
512.0
Rocky River Reach 1, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
a d
90
SiIVCIay
Gravel
bble
80
rr�er
e roc
0
y 70
0 60
E
50
V
c
40
`w
a 30
20
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--0.- MYO-01/2023
Rocky River Reach 1, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
60
w
a
50
�
m
40
u
30
v
20
2
10
0
oti .L1 .L5 oy
00 o
1 'L ,L4� b h� W yti yC0 .�'L �5 �b �O _Ib ..O 5� �ti yti .LDS bq,
ti ti ti ti 3 5 do do �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Rocky River Reach 2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
4
4
4
4
r1�
SP
Very fine
0.062
0.125
4
Fine
0.125
0.250
4
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
8
10
10
14
Coarse
0.5
1.0
4
4
8
8
22
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
3
2
5
5
27
GQP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
27
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
1
28
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
29
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
2
2
31
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
4
4
35
Medium
11.0
16.0
8
5
13
13
48
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
6
9
9
57
Coarse
22.6
32
5
7
12
12
69
Very Coarse
32
45
6
2
8
8
77
Very Coarse
45
64
4
4
4
81
Small
64
90
1
4
5
5
86
Sma
Largee
128
180
2
3
5
5
96
Large
180
256
1
1
1
97
Small
256
362
1
1
1
98
Small
362
512
1
1
1
99
Medium
512
1024
99
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
99
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
1
1
1
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.59
D35 =
11.00
D50 =
17.3
D80. =
78.5
D95 =
168.1
D100 =
>2048
Rocky River Reach 2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Silt/Clay
Sand
90
Gravel
bble
er
a roc
80
70
0
60
0 50
40
V
30
w
u
y 20
a
10
film
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--0.- MYO-01/2023
Rocky River Reach 2, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
60
w
a
50
�
m
40
u
30
v
20
2
10
0
00 oti o
,L4b b hb W yti yC0 .�'L �5 �b �O .ti4� ..O 5� �ti yti .LDS bq,
ti ti ti ti 3 5 do do �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Rocky River Reach 3, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
15
15
15
15
r1�
SP
Very fine
0.062
0.125
18
18
18
33
Fine
0.125
0.250
8
8
8
41
Medium
0.25
0.50
8
8
8
49
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
1
50
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
50
GQP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
50
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
50
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
50
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
1
51
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
1
52
Medium
11.0
16.0
5
5
5
57
Coarse
16.0
22.6
12
12
12
69
Coarse
22.6
32
11
11
11
80
Very Coarse
32
45
9
9
9
89
Very Coarse
45
64
5
5
5
94
Small
64
90
2
2
2
96
Smal
90
128
96
Largee
128
180
2
2
2
98
Large
180
256
98
Small
256
362
2
2
2
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.06
D35 =
0.15
D50 =
1.0
D84 =
37.2
D95 =
75.9
D100 =
362.0
Rocky River Reach 3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
SandGravel
90
Silt/Clay
bble
a roc
er
gp
70
0
60
0 50
E
40
V
30
w
u
y 20
a
10
1-
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--*.- MYO-01/2023
Rocky River Reach 3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
60
w
a
50
�
m
40
u
30
v
20
2
10
0
00 oti o
ti ti ti ti 3 5 do do �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Schist Creek, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
7
24
31
31
31
r1�
SP
Very fine
0.062
0.125
3
3
3
34
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
4
5
5
39
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
11
13
13
52
Coarse
0.5
1.0
4
4
4
56
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
1
57
GQP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
57
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
2
2
59
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
2
2
61
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
4
4
65
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
1
66
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
2
3
3
69
Coarse
16.0
22.6
1
1
1
70
Coarse
22.6
32
3
1
4
4
74
Very Coarse
32
45
4
1
5
5
79
Very Coarse
45
64
7
7
7
86
Small
64
90
3
3
3
89
Sma
Largee
128
180
4
4
4
99
Large
180
256
1
1
1
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
0.14
D50 =
0.4
D80. =
57.9
D95 =
128.0
D100 =1
256.0
Schist Creek, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Sand
90
Silt/Clay
Gravel
bble
a roc
er
80
70
0
60
0 50
40
V
30
w
u
y 20
a
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--*.- MYO-01/2023
Schist Creek, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
60
w
a
50
�
m
40
u
30
v
20
'v
10
0
00 oti o
ti ti ti ti 3 5 do do �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Gypsum Creek, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
27
29
29
29
r1�
SP
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
1
1
30
Fine
0.125
0.250
7
7
7
37
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
7
8
8
45
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
2
4
4
49
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
2
2
51
GQP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
51
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
2
3
3
54
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
1
3
3
57
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
1
3
3
60
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
1
61
Medium
11.0
16.0
7
1
8
8
69
Coarse
16.0
22.6
9
9
9
78
Coarse
22.6
32
10
10
10
88
Very Coarse
32
45
4
4
4
92
Very Coarse
45
64
6
6
6
98
Small
64
90
1
1
1
99
Smal
90
128
99
Largee
128
180
1
1
1
00
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 -
0.21
D50 =
1.4
D80. =
27.8
D95 =
53.7
D100 =1
180.0
Gypsum Creek, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Sand
90
Silt/Clay
Gravel
bble
a roc
er
80
70
0
60
0 50
40
V
30
w
u
y 20
a
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--0.- MYO-01/2023
Gypsum Creek, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
60
w
a
50
�
m
40
u
30
v
20
10
0
00 oti o
W yti yC0 .�'L �5 �b �O .ti4� ..O
ti ti ti ti 3 5 do do �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DIMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Mica Creek, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
19
19
19
19
r1�
SP
Very fine
0.062
0.125
19
Fine
0.125
0.250
16
16
16
35
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
1
3
3
38
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
3
4
4
42
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
42
GQP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
42
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
42
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
43
Fine
5.6
8.0
43
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
3
5
5
48
Medium
11.0
16.0
3
4
7
7
55
Coarse
16.0
22.6
11
2
13
13
68
Coarse
22.6
32
10
10
10
78
Very Coarse
32
45
7
1
8
8
86
Very Coarse
45
64
5
5
5
91
Small
64
90
6
6
6
97
Sma
Largee
128
180
1
1
1
99
Large
180
256
1
1
1
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 -
0.25
D50 =
12.2
D80. =
41.3
D95 =
80.3
D100 =
256.0
Mica Creek, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Sand
90
Silt/Clay
Gravel
bble
a roc
er
gp
70
0
60
0 50
E
40
V
30
w
u
y 20
a
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--*.— MYO-01/2023
Mica Creek, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
60
w
a
50
�
m
40
u
30
v
20
2
10
0
00 oti o
W yti yC0 .�'L �5 �b �O .ti4� ..O 5� �ti yti .LDS bq,
ti ti ti ti 3 5 do do �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Rocky River Reach 1, Cross -Section 2
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
6
6
6
P�0
S
Very fine
0.062
0.125
6
Fine
0.125
0.250
3
3
9
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
1
10
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
11
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
3
3
14
GQQ
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
15
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
17
Fine
4.0
5.6
17
Fine
5.6
8.0
17
Medium
8.0
11.0
4
4
21
Medium
11.0
16.0
12
12
33
Coarse
16.0
22.6
11
11
44
Coarse
22.6
32
7
7
51
Very Coarse
32
45
7
7
58
Very Coarse
45
64
16
16
74
(0
Small
64
90
13
13
87
Small
90
La ge
1 8
180
1
1
97
Large
180
256
97
QFQ
0�%�
'b
Small
256
362
2
2
99
Small
362
512
1
1
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
100
Total
100
1 100
100
Cross -Section 2
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
3.35
D35 =
17.04
D50 =
30.4
D84 =
83.2
D95 =
123.1
D100 =
512.0
Rocky River Reach 1, Cross -Section 2
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
and
90
Silt/Clay
Gravel
bble
a ro
gp
er
70
0
60
Z;° 50
E 40
V
30
w
u
20
y
a
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023
Rocky River Reach 1, Cross -Section 2
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
w
70
60
w
a
50
j
40
30
v
20
'v
10
0
1�Op bO0'
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Rocky River Reach 1, Cross -Section 3
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
1
1
P�0
S
Veryfine
0.062
0.125
1
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
1
2
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
GQQ
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
3
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
5
Medium
11.0
16.0
7
7
12
Coarse
16.0
22.6
15
15
27
Coarse
22.6
32
28
28
55
Very Coarse
32
45
20
20
75
Very Coarse
45
64
13
13
88
(0
Small
64
90
6
6
94
Small
90
Large
1 8
180
4
4
99
Large
180
256
1
1
100
QFQ
0
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
JBedrock
2048
1 >2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Cross -Section 3
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
17.54
D35 =
24.96
D50=
30.1
D84 =
57.4
D95 =
128.0
D100 =
256.0
Rocky River Reach 1, Cross -Section 3
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
-
90 Silt/Clay
and Gravel
bble
gp
er
a ro
70
0
60
50
E
40
V
30
w
u
20
y
a
10
----tEE
0
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023
Rocky River Reach 1, Cross -Section 3
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
w
70
60
w
a
50
j
40
30
v
20
'v
10
0
o �'Loytih O.tih Qh
1 'L ,L'b b �<o �b ,�5 ,��o �,tio ,�'L �h �b �O htiO h�0 �yC� ��'1, h,�'1.1O,LP �Op bOo
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Rocky River Reach 2, Cross -Section 5
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
0
P�0
S
Very fine
0.062
0.125
0
Fine
0.125
0.250
0
Medium
0.25
0.50
0
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
1
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
6
6
7
GQQ
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
9
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
11
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
12
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
13
Medium
8.0
11.0
7
7
20
Medium
11.0
16.0
14
14
34
Coarse
16.0
22.6
9
9
43
Coarse
22.6
32
16
16
59
Very Coarse
32
45
16
16
75
Very Coarse
45
64
8
8
83
Small
64
90
8
8
91
Smal
Largel
128
180
3
3
99
Large
180
256
1
1
100
QFQ
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1 1024
1 2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
1 >2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 5
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
9.17
D35 =
16.63
D50 =
26.3
D84 =
66.8
D95 =
119.3
D100 =
256.0
Rocky River Reach 2, Cross -Section 5
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay
and Gravel
bble
80
er
a ro
70
0
60
50
E
40
V
30
1
w
u
20
y
a
10
0
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023
Rocky River Reach 2, Cross -Section 5
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
w
70
60
w
a
50
j
40
30
v
20
'v
10
0
o �'Loytih O.tih �h
1 'L ,L'b b �b lb ,�5 ,��o o ,�'L �h �b �O htiO h�0 �yC� ��'1, h,�'1.1O,LP �Op bO4,
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Rocky River Reach 3, Cross -Section 6
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
0
P�0
S
Very fine
0.062
0.125
0
Fine
0.125
0.250
0
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
1
1
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
2
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
3
GQQ
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
3
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
4
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
5
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
6
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
8
Medium
11.0
16.0
11
11
19
Coarse
16.0
22.6
14
14
33
Coarse
22.6
32
30
30
63
Very Coarse
32
45
18
18
81
Very Coarse
45
64
12
12
93
Small
64
90
1
1
94
Smal
Largel
128
180
2
2
99
Large
180
256
99
QFQ
Small
256
362
1
1
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1 1024
1 2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
1 >2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 6
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
14.45
D35 =
23.13
D50 =
27.5
D84=
49.1
D95 =
101.2
D100 =
362.0
Rocky River Reach 3, Cross -Section 6
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay
Sand Gravel
We
gp
a ro
70
0
60
50
E
40
V
30
w
u
20
y
a
10
0
—
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023
Rocky River Reach 3, Cross -Section 6
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
w
70
60
w
a
50
j
40
30
v
20
'v
10
0
�Op bO4,
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Schist Creek, Cross -Section 7
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
13
13
13
P�0
S
Very fine
0.062
0.125
13
Fine
0.125
0.250
10
10
23
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
2
25
Coarse
0.5
1.0
25
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
26
GQQ
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
26
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
28
Fine
4.0
5.6
28
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
30
Medium
8.0
11.0
3
3
33
Medium
11.0
16.0
8
8
41
Coarse
16.0
22.6
11
11
52
Coarse
22.6
32
10
10
62
Very Coarse
32
45
13
13
75
Very Coarse
45
64
6
6
81
Small
64
90
10
10
91
Smal
Largel
128
180
2
2
00
Large
180
256
100
QFQ
0
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1 1024
1 2048
100
BEDROCK
JBedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
100
Total
100
100
1 100
Cross -Section 7
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
0.15
D35 -
12.08
D50 =
21.2
D84 =
70.9
D95 =
110.1
D100 =
1 180.0
Schist Creek, Cross -Section 7
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay
and Gravel
bble
gp
er
a ro
70
0
60
50
40
V
30
w
u
20
y
a
10
0
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023
Schist Creek, Cross -Section 7
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
w
70
60
w
a
50
j
40
30
v
20
10
0
�Op bO0'
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Gypsum Creek, Cross -Section 8
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
6
6
6
P�0
S
Very fine
0.062
0.125
6
Fine
0.125
0.250
6
Medium
0.25
0.50
10
10
16
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
2
18
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
6
6
24
GQQ
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
24
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
4
4
28
Fine
4.0
5.6
28
Fine
5.6
8.0
6
6
34
Medium
8.0
11.0
6
6
40
Medium
11.0
16.0
14
14
54
Coarse
16.0
22.6
12
12
66
Coarse
22.6
32
16
16
82
Very Coarse
32
45
6
6
88
Very Coarse
45
64
8
8
96
Small
64
90
96
Smal
Largel
128
180
2
2
00
Large
180
256
100
QFQ
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 8
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
0.50
D35 =
8.44
D50 =
14.4
D84 =
35.9
D95 =
61.2
D100 =
180.0
Gypsum Creek, Cross -Section 8
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
and
90
Silt/Clay
Gravel
bble
a ro
gp
er
70
0
60
50
40
V
30
w
u
20
y
a
10
_'41
_4wo
oo,
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023
Gypsum Creek, Cross -Section 8
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
w
70
60
w
a
50
j
40
30
v
20
'v
10
0
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Mica Creek, Cross -Section 9
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
0
P�0
S
Very fine
0.062
0.125
0
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
1
1
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
41
GQQ
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
2
Medium
8.0
11.0
7
7
9
Medium
11.0
16.0
12
12
21
Coarse
16.0
22.6
26
26
47
Coarse
22.6
32
15
15
62
Very Coarse
32
45
13
13
75
Very Coarse
45
64
13
13
88
Small
64
90
7
7
95
Smal
Largel
128
180
1
1
99
Large
180
256
1
1
100
QFQ
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
100
Cross -Section 9
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
13.69
D35 =
19.27
D50 =
24.2
D84 =
57.4
D95 =
90.0
D100 =
256.0
Mica Creek, Cross -Section 9
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Sand
90
Silt/Clay
Gravel
bble
a ro
gp
er
70
0
60
50
E
40
V
30
w
u
20
y
a
10
0
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023
Mica Creek, Cross -Section 9
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
w
70
60
w
a
50
j
40
30
v
20
'v
10
0
o �'Loytih O.tih �h
1 'L ,L'b b �<o �b ,�5 ,��o �,tio ,�'L �h �b �O htiO h�0 �yC� '1, h,�'1.1O,LP �O, bO��o
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-01/2023

APPENDIX D. Project Timeline and Contact Info

Table 10. Project Activity and Reporting History
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Activity or Reporlp Data Collection Complete
Instituted N/A
Completion or Scheduled Delivery
November 2019
Mitigation Plan Approved N/A
October 2021
Invasive Vegetation Treatment
March -June 2021
Construction (Grading) Completed N/A
August 2022
Invasive Vegetation Treatment
August -December 2022
As -Built Survey Completed
October 2022
October 2022
Planting Completed
N/A
January 2023
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
Stream Survey
October 2022
January 2023
Vegetation Survey
January 2023
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2024
December 2024
Vegetation Survey
2024
Year 2 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2025
2025
Vegetation Survey
2025
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2026
2026
Vegetation Survey
2026
Year 4 Monitoring
2027
2027
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2028
2028
Vegetation Survey
Year 6 Monitoring
2029
Year 7 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2030
Vegetation Survey
Table 11. Project Contact Table
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Designer
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Abigail Vieira, PE
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
Wildlands Construction
Construction Contractor
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Jason Lorch
Monitoring, POC
919.851.9986

APPENDIX E. Record Drawings

Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
for
0
a
a N
p4
Park
:,be
m
a' I
2 Rocky River
SITE
• 41I
i
Vicini Ma
of to c e
I, DAVID S. TURNER, CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY TO COLLECT AS -BUILT DATA WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECT
AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT THE TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL TO MEET FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA
COMMITTEE STANDARDS; THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY TO THE HORIZONTAL ACCURACY OF CLASS A AND THE VERTICAL ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE TO CLASS C
STANDARD, AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED IN SEP-OCT 2022; THAT THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED
ON 17 OCTOBER 2022; AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NAD83 (2011) AND ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON
NAVD88. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER, AND SEAL
TH
IS 28th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023.
��. � ,�O�oFESS/pti9'Yy s
DAVID S. TURNER, P... pL-4551 Q sFAL �.
L4551
SUR. `
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
AS -BUILT AND
RECORD DRAWINGS
ISSUE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2023
Project Location
35049'12.34" N, 790 33'43.89" W
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DATA SHOWN
ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION, IS AN
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED
IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN
THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND
LTHIS 28th DAY OF FEBRUARY ,2023.
J; � ,w CAR ""'.
I TU ER, P.L.S. itL-4551 �oQ
!/ _ SEAL
L-4551
- y >
Sheet Index
Title Sheet 0.1
Project Overview 0.2
General Notes and Symbols 0.3
Stream Plan and Profiles
Rocky River 1.01-1.07
Schist Creek 1.08-1.09
Gypsum Creek Reach 2 1.10
Dolomite Creek Reach 2 1.11
Mica Creek 1.12-1.18
Wetland Overview 2.0
Planting 3.0-3.1
Project Directory
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
License No. F-0831
312 W. Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Angela Allen, PE, Project Manager
Abigail Vieira, PE, Project Engineer
919-851-9986
Surveying:
Turner Land Surveying
P.O. Box 148
Swannanoa, NC 28778
David S. Turner, PLS
919-827-0745
Owner:
NCDEQ DMS
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Attention: Jeremiah Dow
919-791-4248
NCDEQ Contract No. 7877-01
DMS ID No. 100135
USACE Action ID No. 2020-00047
DWR No. 20200035

\
\
N/F N/F
d LYN S. RICHARDSON LYN VILLA SMITH RICHARDSON
D.B. 2629, PG. 732 \ D.B. 2629, PG. 726
P.B. NA, PG. NA P.B. NA, PG. NA
N/F PID:78500 \ PID:78502
CLYDE OLIVER PG. 197 .. d PIN: 8735-35-5209 \ PIN: 8735-35-9444
D.B. 1912, PG. 197
P.B. NA, PG.NA \
PID:7844447
PIN: 8735-15-4919
\ / /
BEGIN MICA CREEK
(RESTORATION)
r STA.502+01
l� N/F
SUMMITNORTH LIBERTY HOLDINGS I LLC
u D.B.2219 , PG. 750
P.B. 61, PG. 94
PID:78529
J. PIN: 8735-44-1640
v N/F 4- 4z
\ LYN VILLA SMITH RICHARDSON
D.6.2629,PG.G.714714
P.B. 32, PG.85
\\ PIN 877358484859 .14
Lu
N/F I u \ / C•
TOWN OF SILER CITY \
D.B. 1887, PG.2132 FEMA 100YR FLOODPLAIN I U a'
P.B. 95, PG. 93 \ \ Q �F Q
PID:78409 / END SCHIST CREEK U_ 1.15 2j
PIN: 8735-15-4919 \ \ (RESTORATION) END GYPSUM CREEK END ROCKY RIVER \ v
CE STA.205+01 REACH 2 (RESTORATION) REACH 1(RESTORATION) �, N/F
CE ( - - F' SUMMITNORTH LIBERTY HOLDINGS I LLC
y., CE STA. 303+68 BEGIN ROCKY RIVER 22 D.B. 2228, PG. 765
\ u REACH 2 (ENHANCEMENT I)
CE - CE CE - \ d P.B. 61, PG. 94
\ CE STA.121+13 I F PIN 444200
ID:7 3
CE
CE- CE-CE1. 6 �\
�CE
CE _u I
ROCKY RIVER END MICA CREEK \
1. 1 1. % (RESTORATION)
1 2 STA.513+57 rF d
1 3 4
BEGIN ROCKY RIVER Y 1.05 END ROCKY RIVER
REACH 1 (RESTROATION) Lu • 1 REACH 3 (RESTORATION)
R/ STA. 101+24 �� 1 0 1 10 U END DOLOMITE CREEK 1.0 \ 07 STA. 131+72 \O
X, REACH 2 (ENHANCEMENT II)
STA.402+30 W
G END GYPSUM CREEK
�j Q d a- END ROCKY RIVER
REACH 1(PRESERVATION) Lu END DOLOMITE CREEK F\ \
REACH 1 (PRESERVATION) REACH 2 (ENHANCEMENT I)
�
BEGIN GYPSUM CREEK U
(� BEGIN DOLOMITE CREEK BEC31N ROCKY RIVER
BEGIN SCHIST CREEK REACH 2 (RESTORATION) Lu (RESTORATION) REACH 2 (ENHANCEMENT II) REACH 3 (RESTORATION) 10-3J
R/ STA.301+52
LYN VILLA
/y STA. 2D0+72 c STA.401+88 3 STA. 126+93 SM T/H RICHARDSON
G - 30 D.B. 2629, PG. 726
0 �37-37
P.B. 13, PG.47
33 _ 3D 30 30 33-OI 30 PID:78499
0 LYN VILLA SMITH PIN: 8735-33-8516
H RICHARDSON
BEGIN GYPSUM CREEK BEGIN DOLOMITE CREEK D.B. 2629, PG. 726 LL
R/ REACH 1 (PRESERVATION) REACH 1 (PRESERVATION) P.B. 20, PG. 27
STA.300+00 STA.400+00 PID:78499
PIN: 8735-33-8516
--
Y 4,1 Raw N
R/� I
N/F
HAMPTON J. PIKE
TRUSTEE
D.B. 1713, PG. 720 A
P.B. 39, PG. 26
PID:78526
PIN: 8735-42-1852
NOTES:
1. DEVIATIONS FROM THE DESIGN WILL BE
SHOWN IN RED. Rik/
\ 0' 150' 300' 450'
R/'• (HOHIZONTPL)
r, U
r
y
0
N
O
s

680
675
670
665
ILT
PRE -CONSTRUCTION GRADE \ \ \
DESIGN GP,ADE
105+00
680
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL)
0' 20' 40' 60'
70
(HORIZONTAL)74
Z
N
.j GzT�
z a
Q�
675
665
1 660
105+50
ROCKY RIVER BOO
\ \ le U � ,�. ,il. ,o. ,n. ,o. ,n. ,�. V / .i �--�. � � m._;: •� � \BOO
LOD
� � � � ,n. ,�. ,il. ,o. ,n. ,il. ,o. / %•%n. 6.'% ,�. ,o. ,n. ,�. ,�. ,o. ,n. ,�. ,�. ,o. ,n. •� � \ 1� ,�:.:: ,o. ,n. ,n. ,�. ,o. /
v
1 � �
\ x
\ 77 LOD
O
\ L • p• �• ,�. ,w. w,. ,� w,. ,� ,�,.
\ VO �. . ......... . ' • STA.101+24 .
�� 102+00 JF v w w v ti�h� _
BEGIN ROCKY RIVER
REACH 1 (RESTORATION)
vpliz-
\ STA 102+05-STA 102+69
STA 101+48-STA 101+86 ) VEGETATIVE SOIL LIFT REPLACED WITH BRUSHTOE
ADDED ROCK TO EXISTING RIFFLE \ FOR INCREASED CHANNEL STABILITY —11
�-I
r--�
� U
o �
� O
�z
NOTES:
1. DEVIATIONS FROM THE DESIGN WILL BE
SHOWN IN RED. x
CJ
0 Q
� U
� o
m
v
0
u
V P'-i
O
P4

675
675
Mq�\
c
iti��NF �
670
665
660
655
PRE -CONSTRUCTION GRADE
AS -BUILT GRADE 14
— —
i
DESIGN GRADE
670
665
660
655
118+50 119+00 119+50 120+00 120+50 121+00 121+50 122+00 122+50 123+00
\ J
�`o Boa - - - ROCKY RIVERLUL)—too
- - - - Vot 6jI - - - - - �Op� STA.121+13
END ROCKY RIVER
C REACH 1 (RESTORATION) \`r%
too BEGIN ROCKY RIVER \�
6) O� D—VOD REACH 2 (ENHANCEMENT 1)
— T8
�� �::_•,�� ��,` -•TB668_- - -- �TB--
CG
O
CIO
PPS
Ol —GO,
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL)
0' 20' 40' 60'
70
(HORIZONTAL)74
Z
b N w
N
�aW
�zTz
z
a
Q�
�ta� *�L••� '�+jr�
�r
� U
o �
� O
�z
NOTES:
1. DEVIATIONS FROM THE DESIGN WILL BE
SHOWN IN RED.
2. AS -BUILT INFORMATION FOR DOLOMITE
(xj
CREEK IS ADDRESSED ON SHEET 1.11.
(] Q
� U
a~
_
m
v
0

0' 2' 4' 6'
IvERncay �
o' 20' 40' 60' G
z
(HORIZOIVTPL)
NSW zTz
z a
670 670 Q a
`iti LL* I .I Irrrr��ffi
---- -- _ DESIGN GRADE : '•AL ''j%r
66S — — _ _ 665
AS -BUILT GRADE
�rlrl 11 l5�
PRE -CONSTRUCTION GRADE
660 660
r-•I
655 655 0
w
654 654
123+00 123+50 124+00 124+50 125+00 125+50 126+00 126+50 127+00 127+30
,.. 669 �. o - - I NOTES:
0°� \ 1. DEVIATIONS FROM THE DESIGN WILL BE
\ SHOWN IN RED.
''' '"' "'' 93A 66& I 2. AS -BUILT INFORMATION FOR MICA CREEK IS
f m •. Q \ hjl ADDRESSED ON SHEETS 1.12 THROUGH 1.18. 0 Q �/ m •
+�
VP8 ,' LOD
OD—LODL.DD—LOD
668
STA 123+26 - STA 123+64
STREAMBANK STABILITY WAS VEG ad, CiQ� I \2F
ACHIEVED BY GRADING INSTEAD OF 668 `,.. �-^ eIr
L INSTALLING VEGETATIVE SOIL LIFT. ` 1
PP6 _ 6 -
\ STA. 126+93
i \ �81� .�•�\ END ROCKY RIVER A,
-�66. 6� a;c \ •"� REACH 2 (ENHANCEMENT 1) \Q
•-�-:6'-—........ s�\� \66s BE GIN ROCKY RIVER
--- -- REACH 3 (RESTORATION) \
ifig' / "- 66�'Y66`b� • • s6� ```- � � � S*pp � Bl — — Bl — r I , `�. _ i � \
T\7 `�6 Op ` ` ` 81 '' _<� 667 1 \
p0 _ 669
12 PP7
ROCKY RIVER a 127+0(307 0 \
0 OOl oo
001 O ----- r.
'7 0
rA
CIO
\ c6
f\ 4 CIOSTA 126+95 - STA 127+36 \ O
f \ pOl VEGETATIVE SOIL LIFT REPLACED \ .
00'I OOl — WITH BRUSHTOE FOR INCREASED .V
CHANNEL STABILITY \
s kQ\
x
Q 4ciu�n

670
665
660
655
653
127+30 127+50 128+00
7/LOD �
OD—LOD—LOD
G$ /
VP9
AS -BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE — —
PRE -CONSTRUCTION GP.ADE
670
665
660
655
653
128+50
129+00 129+50 130+00
130+50 131+00 131+50 131+80
s6,
C'
668
66)
OF
ROCKY RIVER
r
F\
GWG11
\
I ec)
2gxp0 \
�00
z\
�• •• yam$ \ _ s..'..,�. ,o. `• ..� ' . `: • . `• 66> \C ,n. ,�.�F ,o. ,n. ,n. ,�.
i O
(Op �F
`:'• CLOD �L \ STA.131+72
6B
\ i '• 1;;'• 03A > OD END ROCKY RIVER
vPlo
� G
VEG
cl
STA 126+95 - STA 127+36
VEGETATIVE SOIL LIFT REPLACED
WITH BRUSHTOE FOR INCREASED
CHANNEL STABILITY
•9 \
11 �nt001—OOl 01—Col
•.�• LOD�LOD—LOD LOD—� OF REACH 3 (RESTORATION)
1 SIX.._.667-------81
381
... _.-: --- ... _.... _.6'
\\`
131+00 l0
..o
TB — — — — -
0' 2'
4' 6'
(VERTICAL)
0' 20'
40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
N
NOTES:
1. DEVIATIONS FROM THE DESIGN WILL BE
SHOWN IN RED.
r, U
v
0
d1•� / OF
O
\ 667 0�
Ooaol—o
OOl
0l
A.
CIO] — OOl"— 00

II
680
675
AS -BUILT
GRADE
I
-
DESIGN
GRADE
503+00 503+50
GE
\9s
\
678
677
v.�.,
,o. ,o. ,�. ,o. ,o. ,o. ,n� ,o. ,�. ,o. ,o. ,o. ,�. ,w.= �,� • �u • . ,o. 'n` +00
503 _ • ��
w,. ,� ,w. imp. ,� - ,� J ,4; $,w., w�. ,� ,� ,w. w�. ,� ,w. w�. •,� \` w�. ,� ,� w�. �,k . �,�•. •. Sd—�ti,. •-,i�• • • • �.' • ��
/ . . . 678
L
679 P14
/E MICA CREEK
6j9 ,� ,w. ,m. ,� ,� ,w. ,m. ,� ,� ,w. ,m. ,� ,m ,w. ,o. ,� ,m ,w. ,o. ,� ,� ,w. ,o. ,� 678
STA.502+01
BEGIN MICA CREEK 6 1
(RESTORATION) 4 -
FOR CREDIT
679
672
501+90 502+00
502+50
yX 681
co/ 680 LE/
c� 6;
680
675
672
504+00
0' 1'
2'
3'
(VERTICAL)
0' 10'
20'
30'
(HORIZONTAL)
NOTES:
1. DEVIATIONS FROM THE DESIGN WILL BE
SHOWN IN RED.
r U
v

675
670
669
504+00
— — —
AS -BUILT
GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
--
`
/
I
I
\
/
I
I
II
505+00
505+50
MICA CREEK
/ ---677--- ;' .r.✓
675
670
669
506+00 506+10
0 1 2 3
IVEkTcrU
z Z
J
0' 10' 20' 30'
(HORIZONTAL)
z
a
Q�
\ NOTES:
1. DEVIATIONS FROM THE DESIGN WILL BE
\ SHOWN IN RED.
\y
677 \
r U
v

ol
�.-_-_, `2%~` :`r Ate„ �/ � dll � � U � w
F..- '•4I i'�,'/;/�1 ��1'�Yr„ ;,, _- - `,'d,C, ``� -`-=r' Iny 'Y Z'.j Z,
�I R��` \� � `•; �(v I -I z a s, J
oz
Tc�
ti
' i;" uS� 1. ;lii .I �n,�� � �j :�` T•.....: ,yffi
_ a
,r"•i,, _,.: ^�,' Ir , I ',.:. t
Rw
� `, \ `,',
\,
u_
-------------
I(:'/ `
_-tom n II � _ _ _ _"�`• 'l{`suenl- -- 000vvoovvvvoovvvvvvvvoo`vvDvvvv'voo avvwo`¢v -va �P+-,' vvvroLvovvvvvoo_voovdSsvvoo`vo'vvvvoooovvvvoooo %vt0oomoovdvo•- o`v _yr
---- v�o'voyv5¢o�vb-o-'�'v•, o _.q_'-o_-_-_ -v'y'vv'vvb
- -- _ __- - y•'..-D',,`• --
vvoi
--
vv
vv �O 70 70 70 lP0.9 O O O v O v, O v d,v O O O�v O v ,
-� z � l - v - - _ � - - P•¢ o d o v o d o v o v P/v - v _ ovo - - • tl' V v o v'o vV v v d�-,,�"- - 1 '----- - `_ - _ , _ -- - -
` '` ? �`/,'�_: t�;_ •t\`` ,`�`� \ \ vv _ o=o-¢ �vo vo O-evv_ovavvv-vv000 -9 --=__v- D_ av_- Tv_- _ _= - v vv,q �II bv,p O / -__-,T, -�_i - = _ vvvOvovv vOo v _\ ovbv�oP,vv,vvO,vo4oO7
vvQvV�cvvdA4c17
d4.0voV6,Yv,o0mo?b v.yovvov' YO_`v ` O P
7,7 ovovovovvo vvo v v 9_'-'o'rd/• ,lv0o'- a -o -_ --_ F-�`a',',v'\1�„-•l �';�^•+ = _`--"- -''"`?,�5.�-��;��'',L`,- ,•, \\`„, u•�,�4- M`,\1
O
ova ovovovov v v v OF(v v v v vvv vv vv vvv
- -OvVvOavovovovyvv vv 'ro
vb77vvvv v
"ovLlvogo90 __ vovo - \ -d"vvv- \ yvd, y� = o ov v y vovfv-c�Qvovov ov - o,bovovovb-bvv ov`ovovovod•,0000rtoo y - vovovov __ rs:;='°', '\, `�'r`I°,�,'"'3 '-+
��;%�`�'' vv v v� �- `vv moo ,,ovovo v � vv--v,-a II'vv v v vv boo vvlvvII3vm_Qvvvvvv v_zvvvv v vvv 777,vvvvvvvv`ov
vovovov'v� go ov '`z_ovovov vo o •ovov' ovov _ ov off vvv
"- ";,t'•. e`v�v.vvovvv®�vII o v d`o o- v o vas_ _ rov_______v� 3v 3--�F v_vvvovavo
v9- o =-,ti' vovo, v-Pvovovovovo�-vvvvvv _o o' '�_`�'�'+ =_�_- "n;, {\,e��°,'`,�-'•ctx'` `U �g v vovo v - vvv 9-ovog vovov vovd, -ba,ov vovo ovo ovo vo`o vadv - o - - , h
v` ••o`S•v'iJceo✓T° vgoQ.o vPv0 a�vzI,P{v^aicovy_va 9v�v_vv-va_vy ov vv -vv p'dr,L 'dv'`Q PvwO "oa`-evbvv"Pvvv_q ovw O v Ovvpv_dmv__v_"`v--v--v-,v-,v__9v,-agvW�vv vvvO�vvffiv0�dvv-_Cv¢- �Og'v�,=� v_ II-b v v_--•O-=P.[_j�_oOv_,9_v_LD_v_dOv-�v: av-�v.-.g�F\-d-, gvv`vgov,bv
vayfII9vvadII.vvvvvv
I:"°r}'\';t', ✓:••1' �
�Q^1
-
I-ovovvvvcIIvovvvvv_yv vo
-77 v PaQv vv vv vvvv9vvvv vvvv vv vv Odvvv s_sz v v v vvvv
a-ovv v v vvvvvvv
vvQvvvv v v_Oov v v v v v v O_Q
v777 avvvI voOvvadPfvvvvo,vbvdvvvi� vovovov _ ___ _ �j �,' •^I '?�
_l - ,v o v g - - ,r'-i'; -----_-- __ __-_-'" __--_ -b o•q '- -- -y.`. _ - -- v d- _ __== v_o v D-moo-v_y o v o v o v v9 0 o v orov"o y,•o a;¢y.9 v o v o o;o o+p o 0 0 o v o �� - -" - --. a"` �]
-- - _ - -' - bv..v ado-o_v.s-v"v�:IIv` v _va •¢'v v'o. "xzvvkvvvvvvvvvba
o
-
-- ' " -• - - - - - ' "- " -- - vv-crC. ,la'v v o v `[S_dv` -v'v'b• v o 0 0 0 o c b Y
0 0 0 0 0
y
- - - - - vvv v-e.e' °v�' v`' v. B �vvd�vvo -g �ovovos'
- _ o v'-<f'a o o 0 v a'cl v o 0 ®•v do 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oe+ -
\O VL O dv 98v v v O v O v QRRQQR F�QO v
cl
_ - _____
_Ll
1' —
a - - _
S - - �s
- h
_.\ _ _ -
q",
-------------
-
- 3
' —
r�
D
r\ ,
w•z _
- 1
WETLAND RE-ESTABLISHMENT 0000000
- `rA'' - - _ ' I i _ - 'ti ,''�r; "'� t,'=' ' \ .fir•-...-' ' (�\I ,-` - ,_ -
- - - - - WETLAND REHABILITATION
�` V •s ywy Raw �� � _ � ti
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
WETLAND PLUG R N
�w K
\ 0' 100' 200' 300'
K (HORIZONTAL) �,+ 7.

Zone 1 - Streambank Planting - Rocky River, Schist Creek
Zone 2 - Streambank Planting - Gypsum Creek, Dolomite Creek, Mica Creek
Zone 3 - Buffer Planting Zone
Zone 4 - Wetland Planting Zone 5,
Zone 5 - Permanent Seeding Outside Easement
Zone 6 - Supplemental Planting in Existing Forested Wetlands
Note: Non -hatched areas within easement are currently vegetated and were planted as needed to achieve target density.
Hatched areas determined to be meeting target density were not planted. \
Buffer planting occured within the Limits of Disturbance.
o°� v
LOD E OOl 001
LOD - LOD WWI
-N
r--�
O
o
U
d
�
o
�z
�o
�
U
�
o
3D-3J3D30�30�30�30�30
�30�30�30�3��30�
30-3.) 33-30 3J 33-
I
w
I
by I
R 0' 100, 200' 300,
/w )HORIZONTAL)
i� Kx
a

APPENDIX F. Additional Documentation

SOIL BORING DESCRIPTIONS

Soil Boring Descriptions
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 1:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-17
10YR 5/1 (90%)
7.5YR 5/8 (10%)
C
Buried Charcoal
17-31
N 5 (90%)
7.5YR 5/8 (10%)
7.5YR 5/8 (10%)
C
31-40
10YR 5/1 100%
---
SL
Gravelly
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 2:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-4
10YR 5/3 (98%)
2.5YR 4/8 (2%)
L
4-7
10YR 6/2 (96%)
5YR 5/8 (4%)
L
7-16
2.5Y 7/1 (97%)
5YR 6/8 (3%)
LS
16-25
2.5Y 7/3 (98%)
5YR 5/8 (2%)
SL
25-34
10YR 7/1 (100%)
S
34-43
10YR 7/2 (100%)
S
Coarse
43-55
2.5Y 8/1 100%
S
Coarse
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 3:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-10
10YR 6/3 (85%)
2.5YR 5/8 (15%)
CI -Si
10-21
5Y 7/1(90%)
5YR 5/8 (10%)
SSi
21-33
2.5Y 7/1 (30%)/2.5Y
6/8 (40%)
5YR 5/8 (30%)
Sic
Sandy
33-64
5Y 6/1 100%
--
Sc
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 4:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-5
10YR 4/4 (85%)
7.5YR 5/6 (15%)
LSiS
5-14
2.5Y 5/2 (100%)
---
SL
OM
14-40
2.5Y 6/4 (85%)
7.5YR 6/8 (15%)
LS
40-70
5Y 6/1 90%
7.5YR 6/6 10 %
LS
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 5:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-37
2.5Y 6/1 (55%)
10YR 6/8 (45%)
C
37-41
7.5YR 7/1(65%)
7.5YR 6/8 (35%)
CS
41-64
5Y 6/1 98%
2.5YR 5/8 2%
CS 80% , Gravel 20%
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 6:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-3
10YR 4/3 (95%)
5YR 4/3 (5%)
SiL
3-15
10YR 6/3 (90%)
7.5YR 5/8 (10%)
LS
15-23
2.5Y 6/3 (80%)
2.5YR 4/8 (20%)
Sc
23-28
10YR 5/2 (100%)
---
Sc
Undecomposed Wood
28-30
2.5Y 5/2 100%
S

Soil Boring Descriptions
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100135
Monitoring Year 0 - 2023
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 7:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-9
10YR 5/1 (95%)
7.5YR 5/6 (5%)
SiCL
9-14
10YR 5/1 (95%)
7.5YR 5/6 (5%)
CL
14-31
10YR 5/1 (98%)
7.5YR 5/6 (2%)
Sc
31+
2.5Y 7/1 100%
---
S
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 8:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-3
10YR 4/2 (97%)
5YR 5/6 (3%)
L
3-16
10YR 5/1 (85%)
2.5YR 4/6 (15%)
CL
16-22
7.5YR 4/1(96%)
7.5YR 5/6 (4%)
CL
Sandy
22-30
5YR 5/1 (95%)
7.5YR 5/6 (5%)
CL
30-39
5YR 4/1(100%)
C
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 9:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-7
10YR 4/3 (95%)
7.5YR 6/8 (5%)
SiL
7-16
10YR 6/4 (97%)
7.5YR 6/6 (3%)
SL
16-27
7.5YR 7/1 (75%)
7.5YR 6/8 (25%)
SiCL
27-42
10YR 6/1 (85%)
7.5YR 6/8 (15%)
CL
Stiff (Wets/Dries)
42+
5Y 6/1 100%
SiCL
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 10:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-19
10YR 5/6 (100%)
---
CL
19-27
10YR 7/2 (90%)
10YR 6/8 (10%)
LC
Sandy
27-34
10YR 7/2 (100%)
---
S
34-50
10YR 5/1 100%
---
S
Very Fine
Soil Profile Description at Location of Groundwater Well 11:
Depth Range (in.)
Color
Redox
Texture
Notes
0-8
2.5Y 5/2 (95%)
7.5YR 5/8 (5%)
SL
8-11
2.5Y 6/2 (95%)
10YR 6/8 (5%)
SL
11-25
10YR 6/3 (96%)
10YR 7/6 (4%)
S
Very Fine
25-36
2.5Y 6/3 (98%)
2.5Y 6/8 (2%)
S
Very Fine
36-45
2.5Y 6/1 100%
S 95% , Gravel 5%
Very Fine

LUNKER BOX INSTALLATION

Lunker Box Installation (810412022)
Liberty Rock Mitigation Site
Appendix F: Additional Documentation - Lunker Box Installation Photographs