Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
130010_Inspection_20230126
*Division of Water Resources Facility Number V71 - \® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: -.•Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: •Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: -j-7.3 Arrival Time: '.013 Departure Time: %2',(/D County: ecloceyb Region: terv24, Farm Name: pOCQ�, I, P lit% A 50,rys, 'mat vNA Owner Email: Owner Name: Cj rey, ?NreS5 Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: fL \\ yam, Facility Contact: 5.e _ Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: '5.e e_. Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow 22O 119 • Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow _ Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes r 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020-Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: WColt" 1 d Spillway?: &JO Designed Freeboard(in): 1 ck Observed Freeboard(in): 4's 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 2 No ❑NA ❑NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? • ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes III No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes rig No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ['Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Eyl No ❑ NA ❑NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes lZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). Reviewer/Inspector Name: I Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ']— ) � E�j�i i Date: I—16,-743 Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020