Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout490094_Inspection_20230217 le Division of Water Resources Facility Number - 4 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: 2—l'l- 23 Arrival Time: 1 0 tub Departure Time: l I ;ern County: aire8t Region: mRp Farm Name: GQlk;iler i r9 �p,r w\ Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: 14a,rmryl►� N C— Physical Address: • Facility Contact: Lam., &altiher Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish _ Layer X Dairy Cow (Qbb Li Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current )( Dry Cow loc 32 _Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish •Layers Beef Stocker Gilts _Non-Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: k f) 1 1 lac,sk 'L Spillway?: N O N b Designed Freeboard(in): 30 (.0 Observed Freeboard(in): /OLp A/M- 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �]( No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No E NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 0-.6f ry 13. Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Si No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [4 No. ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No ❑NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZI No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Igj No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NI NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 14 No ❑NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes rp No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). Reviewer/Inspector Name: J I Gl,y for �'Zt/ Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: af` j Date: Z-! 1- 23 Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020