230009_Inspection_20230124

®Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - Oq 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: •Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: •Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /-z.4-2_'3 Arrival Time: 3'.-5 O Departure Time: q'.30 County: c1,vv, Region: rv1R.o
Farm Name: CAD V.Lr Q der_ tQ%r f Owner Email:
'Owner Name: .1 e.c.(' C.6044w,en Phone: 10 9 411 Q(o
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: LQw h AG,\{ t !VC.'
Facility Contact: Sea_ Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Ac12o,,.c Integrator:
Y _
Certified Operator,: Certification Number:
\h,
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: •- Longitude:
Design Current Design Current a Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer X Dairy Cow t2.5
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
•
Feeder to Finish .• Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean - Design Current •Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poultr Ca I acit Po.. Non-Dairy 200
Farrow to Finish Beef Stocker
-
Gilts - I Non-Layers -- Beef Feeder.
Boars •Pullets -- :' Beef Broodtow
Turkeys --
Other •Turke Poults --r
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ^ _ . Other:
Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes TO-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3. 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Pad oc L6c,,¢-
Spillway?: N O nrb
Designed Freeboard(in): 2c) •4- 2 5
Observed Freeboard(in): 25. 't. 35
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EZNo ❑NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [ ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 01 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes cz No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: h i , :_ Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment'as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ .No" ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ®NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems, over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems poted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ni No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
cze -Nww.- 011lly AT) ?
bctAX,s Gcc,r 0-4 SV s- s
Reviewer/Inspector Name: gLj.- EZ t( Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /-2;4.Z3
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020