310049_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230228

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 ! - O y G O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: a Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I a 1� YIZ31 Arrival Time:� Departure Time: UO County: pU %vt Region: W 1 R0
Farm Name: Dail 13 rofhe✓,s t Gd wA rd L-t 1/ 5-IA — Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: E/w451 (*a rrj.4. Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer I I I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-La er I I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 3/0 y$00 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 1340 13;,6 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacitv Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish La ers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layer Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets I Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [I-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: -5 1 jDate of Inspection: z zg Z
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 3 C5
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NI;
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [:J-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need [:] Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EEI'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [i]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps [] Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: 3/ - 0 Date of Inspection: ;Z/2V 12,
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Z�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ZI NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes E3 No 0 NA ONE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? 0 Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Z No 0 NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [�t`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
12111127
a,-w"a It
5 I Vrl�.e. 5 u rvcy 1/
5 4/ l
ro l l g�Z,z cv2rr 3��4�5
f'il anC, 5,5
N-k.
�U✓Wt j Vh,dt'- �rirri
�' /titAdin J4u w)
l
Reviewer/Inspector Name: l f-i Z-Zb Phone: qI0 •3976. 122 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020