310033_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230228

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 r - a 33 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: O'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: trRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 a fa 4f/ Arrival Time: 01% 1°/ANl Departure Time: : U County: Region: i Ro
Farm Name: 06i l 0,"OV7 S L3ye5Axlc , It C Owner Email:
Owner Name: PLI �' Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: C'A'Jo c/ 60'rnt r- Integrator:
Certified Operator: ?tw yjjm1 Certification Number: f OO 4 '6 6<6
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer IDairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-La er I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 1/;z 00 10 Soo Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Efl"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes D-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes M—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [/]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: - Q 3 Date of Inspection: P �3
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [J`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): �
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [D--No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [3& ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ✓�No ❑ NA ❑ N F:
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [D-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ED'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Raini,ill Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes F-frNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

[Facility Number: - 033 1 Date of Inspection: a Zy- 2.$
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [5No 0 NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [DNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No F71 NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [.]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ N E
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Ycs []'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
5 �c4C� ✓ 12�ll�Z Z_ cNnw�y
(.A(,6r rvv� , 5 /2 0/_X
�a�`l ur+alysrs ✓ /0/2 y/?Z
Reviewer/Inspector Name: " ee[r�� Phone: 17/0 • 37-6 .A?>y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2/2 g/Z3
Page 3 of 3 511212020