NC0021733_Wasteload Allocation_19880602

PERMIT NO.: NCOO
FACILITY NAME:
Facility Status: PROPOSED
(circle one)
Permit Status: RENEWAL CNODWICAMN
(circle one)
Major -Minor,-
Pipe No:
Design Capacity (MGD):
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
UNPERbffrrM NEW
Comments:
,,Lc- /o44Qiied �)t,4 Pon 0,0 51L.d. awn W AY,6hallt(JpS
RECEIVING STREAM:
Class:
Sub -Basin:
Reference USGS Quad: l s' "'"/ (please attach)
County:
Regional Office: AS Fa Me Ra Wa Wi WS
(circle one)
Requested By: Date:0—
i
Prepared By: Date: ,
Reviewed y: Date:
Modeler Date Rec.�___
Zo ?A
Drainage Area (mi 2) 15-59 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 2�4,?F_
7Q10 (cfs) �3S Winter 7Q10 (cfs) �E 30Q2 (cfs) 030
Toxicity Limits: IWC �9. /a % (circle ons Acut / Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream A; Location
Downstream '� Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
30
NH j N (mg/0
N✓
D.O. (mg/1)
,Veil
TSS (mg/1)
30
F. Col. (/100mi)
A*1
PH (SU)
,��
Comments:

` . Request No. :4620
'
--------------------- WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL RECEIVED
FORM -----------=------�--
' YVuter QuaU\yCncimn
Permit Number
Facility Name
Type of Waste
Status
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
Subbasin
County
Regional Office
Requestor
Date of Request
Quad
: NC0021733
: TOWN OF �`«`r!�'|
: DOMESTIC//
: EXISTING 'tX^vdi^w^+
: FRENCH BROAD RIVER
: C
: 040304
Asheville R8giDno| IN
,ASh8vU\8.North Carolina
: MADISON
Drainage Area
(sq mi)
: 1338.
: ARO
Average Flow
(cfs)
: 2488
: HARRIS
Summer 7010
(cfs)
: 535.
: 4/20/88
Winter 7010
(cfs)
: 682.
: D8SW
3002
(cfs)
:
------------------------- RECOMMENDFD EFFLUENT LIMITS -------------------------
�
,����.
Wasteflow (mgd): 0.400 ��
5-Day BOD (mg/1): 30
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/1): nr
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l''.
TSS (mg/l): ,..� -
Fecal Coliform (#/100ml): nr &��
-~° ���
PH (SU): nr
: T�,� �Nn/K/���/ ; - ~ �."u.,^�'uNC.
:
�
--------------------------------- MONITORING --------------------------------
Upstream (Y/N): Location:
Downstream (Y/N): Al Lo—+ion:
------------- .... ..... ..... -..... .... -- -- -----------
Reviewed by:
Recommended b
Tech. SuPPor+
..
Region
Permits & "..gineering
-y/
0�� �� ����
vwxxon � o v���
RETuRN TO TECHNICAL GERVICES BY .

�4 r
ii
Facility Name Permit # AIC-06 21733
ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QRTRLY)
Fathead Minnow 24 hr - No.Sign ifcant Mortality
The perm ittee shall conduct acute -toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using pirotocols defined -inane.
_North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute
Toxicity In A Single Effluent Concentration". The monitoring shall :be performed as a Fathead
Minnow Timephales - promelas 24 hour static test, using effluent collected' as a 24 hour
composite. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality
is 90% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). Effluent samples for
self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste
treatment. The first test will be performed after thirty days from issuance of this permit during the
months of FHB MaY Auk NOV
All toxicity testing results required as :part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for -the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
- code TGE6C. Additionally, DEM Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Technical Services Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured ar%d reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test -data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be're-opened and modified to include alternate monitoring_ requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure -to achieve test conditions:.as.specified in thercited document, such as minimum
control organism -survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring. event). Failure -to submit
suitable test results will constitute a failurebf permit condition. -
- 7Q10 sss- cfs -
Permitted Flow F MGD
IWC% ./Z- -
Basin & Sub -Basin F.eB o-
Receiving Stream F/ , _.. Aes d
County(So�l
Recommended by:
**Acute Toxicity(Fathead Minnow 24hr) No Significant Mortality at 90°Io;, FE3 MAy .4vc- Nov
See Part 3 , Condition S. '

SUMMER
MODEL
FOR
MARSHALL @ 0.400 MGD
�
SAVED
ON
LBDATA19,MARSH201
..... -..... .... --... .... -..... MODEL RESULTS
--------------
TOWN OF MARSHALL
Receiving
Stream
:
FRENCH BROAD RIVER
____________________________
------------------------------------------
The End
D.O. is
8.41
mg/l.
The End
MOD is
2.02
mg/l.
The End
______________________________________________________________________
NBOD is
1.08
mg/l.
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO
Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO Waste Flow
(mg/1)
.... ......
.... ..... .....
Milepoint Reach #
..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... __ ..... ..... ... ..... .... .... .....
(mg/l)
____
(mg/l)
..... ... .....
(mg/l) (mgd)
..... __ .... .... ..... ..... _.... _... ..... .....
Segment
1 7.71
0.00 1
Reach
1
45.00
90.00
0'00 0.40000

MODEL SUMMARY
S-i
DATA
.. ..h ... ._.
x_%.I. `._�....t l �ti
Discharger
i.l ;.:`:_. „
..1_`...Wi".,` `..:rF
TOWN ...::'
1.);:1...�1...,1 .,•1 i
S' S-;: ", C:it...i�': L_ _..
..., �_ ... ..
�::u r. ,., � I „ t-Yr:.).i +[�ii. 4''.
i"'; w:i' t.:: v :). ,' .,.
i i i_+ Stream „
FRENCH
BROAD RIVER
Stream L., a. r t t- :: ; :; ,..r
Design
Temperature:
23.
:LENGTH!
i ELOPE!
VELOCITY
1 ' TH 1 ii i t: 1 Ili + 1 KN 1 ,ti 1 K 1 K' ;
1{LL�I�; :r�Ui"C; :C�!J�i!1 1 ��i'ti'1 :,i 1 ,;� 1 :,., • ,. _: 1 i:;, 1 I`„< s �:5�,' r 1: "..r 1
t 1 ts! r 1 IL I J_s 1 @2 1 i _) - W ._ } .• I JF,-: ' �l H'
i itil tl' i•;i i�l� I4 IL't�iuftl c:.V 14_b 4tit 'e�4 ICI :. �t utll �i''' lu��tt],t. 's i.J i
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.1 - 1 1_/ i tl ICi i 1 1 -" ! 1
t.u`.)1 ��.:?� ...���� 1 3.4i 1 't?.'iv i �?.ate f.it?.�t? `i,�i1 i�.u.; 1 't'.;Jt{ 1 �?.b� 1 'J.:St)
L R___L 1 i ! I } i i
f emh 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i f 1 r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
r _C , „li t1 tC;1 I i Lr r1
i
Segment 1 Reach J.
Waste 1 0.620 45.000 i 90.000 y 0.00)
('t: U:_t .•. ...t }r l' i 5.J :..l „ 1-..'1•„!+._) i 2.000 1 1.000 ii_' . n : ..... _
Tributary
.it...
.i..^:y... 0.000 1 2.000 i 1.000 1 7.720
Runoff { 0,770 ; S,000 1 1.000 , 7 „ 7 ;:... -.:
:�- Runoff flow is in t :... s ...: ;' t t't .t... ,:::

SUMMER
MODEL
FOR MARSHALL @ 0.400 MGD
'
SAVED
ON LBDATA19,MARSH201
1 Reach # | Beg Mi |
D.O. 1
CBOD (
NBOD
| Flow |
-1 1 0.00
7.71
2.05
1.10
535.62
' 1 1 0.10
7.82
2.05
1.10
535.70
1 1 0.20
7.91
2.04
1.10
535.77
1 1 0.30
7.99
2.04
1.10
535.85
1 1 0.40
8.07
2.04
1.10
535.93
1 1 0.50
8.13
2.04
1.09
536.00
1 1 0.60
8.18
2.03
1.09
536.08
1 1 0.70
8.23
2.03
1.09
536.16
1 1 0.80
8.27
2.03
1.09
536.24
1 1 0.90
8.30
2.03
1.09
536.31
1 1 1.00
8.34
2.02
1.08
536.39
1 1 1.10
8.36
2.02
1.08
536.47
1 1 1.20
8.39
2.02
1.08
536.54
1 1 1.30
8.41
2.02
1.08
536.62
| Beg # } Reach # 1 Seg Mi |
D.O. }
MOD |
NBOD
1 Flow �

JN
�"/ l�
ZI
l
Ovo3U v �Z o
f
£S� 9fj: ,2g9Zci5
t f,•3N91J : 536 Q�3
03, gs3S. zv
T,--,� ,jai
QW : o. 4 moo
lifr� I338ML1�
C,tf QA = Wec63
S3.S CA
£i�, W7�/a .bdLcf3
�1 V G�v
0, 13.31," 1-
Cl -k r
I J
D,77 ci/.,,',
03, ys3 r of 00
qq-. ayes �
S-7 w, 52y�
N��, •- �BT�{s
To92 • /Oaa
55
53— s= c 7
U,G2 c{3
E � 1
d.6Z
L
f- 5
l 53,E Z cf
S3S ca5
,00 11 x !dU

DIVTSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 9, 1.988
MT7M()R A MT)T TM
TO: Roy Davis
1
THRU: David Vogt �
Trevor Clements /
Steve Tedde�� `
FROM: Jackie Nowelij�
SUBJECT: Instream Assessment of Town of Marshall Discharge (88-03)
NPDES # Nd0021733
Madigon County
Summary and Recommendations
The Town of Marshall has requested a first-time JOG to increase the
flow of its WWTP by 30,000 GPD. The impact of this increase in wasteflow on
dissolved oxygen concentrations in the French Broad River was evaluated using
Technical Support's Level B modeling framework. The results of the analysis
indicate that the requested flow increase will have very little additional
impact on the stream and that EMC criteria will be satisfied. For future
reference, our evaluation also determined that Marshall's current request
(WLA # 4620) to increase their design flow to 0.4 MGD, will not cause a
significant impact of more than 0.5 mg/1 of D.O. sag and will not extend the
D.O. sagpoint by more than 0.5 miles. Since the facility's design capacity
is increasing to 0.4 MGD, Technical Support recommends that future JOC allo-
cations not exceed this level.
Background Information
According to the Region, the 12-month average for the Marshall WWTP is
0.124 MGD. However, because of the substantial number of flow exceedances
that occurred during 1987, the Region recommends using the maximum average
monthly flow of 0.171 MGD as the pre-JOC flow. This JOG request is for 0.03
MGD, which gives a post -JOG total flow of 0.200 MGD. In regard to current
permitted limits, the Marshall facility was out of compliance in 1987 with
the limits for flow (12 outrof 12 months), total suspended solids (4 out of
12 months) and biochemical oxygen demand (4 out of 12 months).

Analysis
The Level B model was used to assess the impact of the treatment plant
on dissolved oxygen in the French Broad River. Model runs were completed
at 0.171 MGD (pre-JOC flow), 0.200 MGD (pre-JOC + JOC flow) and 0.400 MGD
(new design capacity) for Marshall WWTP. Model waste inputs reflect the
recommended JOC limit of 90 mg/1 BOD, The model results are presented in
Table 1.
In accordance with the EMC criteria for judging in -stream impacts, the
model results demonstrate no significant depression of the instream D.O.
level or extension of the zone of impact when the wasteflow is increased.
JN/gh
cc: George Everett
Kent Wiggins
Ken Eagleson
Steve Reid le

N ' ,
Table 1. Summary of JOG Analysis for Town of Marshall WWTP Effluent
Wasteflows (MCD) Treatment Level * D.O. Minimum (mg/1) **
Pre-JOC flow 0.171 JOC 7.72
JOG request 0.03 - -
Pre-JOC + JOC request 0.200 JOC 7.72
New Design Capacity 0.400 JOC 7.71
JOC Treatment Level: CBOD = 135 mg/1 (1.5 x 90 mg/1 BOD,)
^* For all runs, the D.O. minimum occurs @ the outfal.l (milepoint 0.0)
Existing
BOD, 30 mg/1 e
TSS 30 mg/1
Limits
Recommended JOC
BOD 90 mg/1
TSS 60 mg/1
PH 6-9 S.U.

--- - --- ell
�r
!4
s3s C6
G,171 MGa wc.q o, ,ugh
dL I Qa� a �D 16 f
�hl G q SO

SUMMER JqVI.Xvc.
MODEL FOR MARSHALL @
AVG. QW & 135 MG/L CBOD
' ---------- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : TOWN OF MARSHALL
Receiving Stream : FRENCH BROAD RIVER
______________________________________________________________________
The End D.O. is 8.41 mg/I.
The End CBOD is 2.03 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 0.98 mg/l.
_n ------------------------------------------------------------------------
WLA
WLA
DO Ki n,
�
DO
F lvv,�.-. °
'~/l) Milepoint Reach #
(--/l)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
______ _________ _______
Segment 1 0.00 1
____
N�
____
0.00
__
0.00
------------
Reach 1

~
MODEL RESULTS
SUMMER .
MODEL FOR MARSHALL @ 0.200 MGD
,CBOD=135 MG/L FOR JOC REQUEST
Discharger
:
TOWN OF MARSHALL
Receiving Stream
:
FRENCH BROAD RIVER
______________________________________________________________________
The End D.O. is
8.41
mg/l.
The End CBOD is
2.04
mg/l.
The End NBOD is
______________________________________________________________________
0.98
mg/l.
�
~
WLA
WLA
DO
Min
NBOD
DO
(mg/l)
Milepoint Reach #
_______
(mg/l)
____
(mg/l)
____
(mg/1) (mgd)
__ _______.... .... .....
..... ..... .....
Segment 1 7.72
Reach 1
___
_________
0.00 1
�
0.00
0.00
�_____
,��`��m�.nn��

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : TOWN OF MARSHALL Subbasin : 040304
RFRENCH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7Q10 : 535. Winter 7�lV : �u�.
Design Temperature: 23.
ILENGTH| SLOPE; YlOClTI 8EPTH| �0 |
ft/mi| fps | ft |dpsign| H"v H-CO, !design� -02o: (Ueslgn|
_________________________________________ _______________________
3.99 | 0,48 0.42 150.68 | 47.1-71 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.63 6.00 �
_ _______________________________________________________________________
| Flow | CBOD
� cfs
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste | 0.310 �135.000
Headwaters|535.000
Tributary � 0.000 | 2.000
* Runoff � 0.770
| 0.000 � 0.000
| 1.000 | 7.720
7.720
| 1.000 | 7.720
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

~^ .
~
SUMMER
'
MODEL FOR MARSHALL @ 0.200 MGD
,CBOD=135 MG/L FOR JOC REQUEST
| Sag # |
Reach # | Sag Mi |
D.O. 1
CBOD
( NBOD 1 Flow |
' 1
1 0.O0
7.72
2.08
1.00 535.31
1
1 0.10
7.82
2.07
1.00 535.39
1
1 0.20
7.92
2.07
1.00 535.46
1
1 0.30
8.00
2.07
0.99 535.54
1
1 0.40
8.07
2.07
0.99 535.62
1
1 0.50
8.13
2.06
0.99 535.69
1
1 0.60
8.18
2.06
0.99 535.77
1
1 0.70
8.23
2.06
0.99 535.85
1
1 0.80
8.27
2.06
0.99 535.93
1
1 0.90
8.31
2.05
0.98 536.00
1
1 1.00
8.34
2.05
0.98 536.08
1
1 1.10
8.36
2.05
0.98 536.16
1
1 1.20
8.39
2.04
0.98 536.23
1
1 1.30
8.41
2.04
0.98 536.31
| Sag #
Reach # 1 Sag Mi 1
D.O. 1
CBOD
1 NBOD | Flow i
n

14 �t
SUMMER
MODEL FOR MARSHALL @ 0.4 MGD.
& RECOMMENDED JOC LIMITS
' ---------- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : TOWN OF MARSHALL
Receiving Stream : FRENCH BROAD RIVER
______________________________________________________________________
The End D.O. is 8.41 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 2.12 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 0.98 mg/l.
______________________________________________________________________
WLA
DO Min
(mg/l) Milepoint Reach # �mg7l}
__ ... ..... ____..... ..... ... ... _..... ..... ..... ..... ... ...... ..... ..... ....
Segment 1 7.71 0.00 1
Reach 1
`
WLA
WLA
NBOD
DO Waste Flow
(mg/l)
__..... ...
(mg/l) (mgd)
__ _____..... ... ..... ..... ....

MODEL SUMMARY
DATA
Discharger
G:{F.ii'
n
TOWN OF
,•i-,Rc.:,lira....,.._
'-it_ii:'si;.......1. { " 040304
(:%'.:c iv'3
ng
„
Stream
", _ , 1i
7
BROAD RIVER
Stream Class: .._
.
682.
1{ E613_�tt 1 SLOPE! K ,'U 1 D H! ]i 1 li i 1 t'p 1 KN 1 Up,t I Kt�NR 1 ,•i+' i
1 �_i:�,!'i1 " �L�Elii 1 DEPTH! i��.J 1 i.� t E,d 1 n� r ,•.14 3 i:17 1 P, iS: i r,:.� 1
I 1 'lj L 1 fL i 1 8�i2+j r��ii 12 j IJ�_ 3 p2ri IJ" _i {37,1J 1
I t9: iv. i full u`l fps ! iL ij��1�{il VC.{ 513251 Jii; vL:) ia. Sa y1I1 t9i.�� stir S:L�iil 'JL.! �
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I
1 1 1 1 3011 Oi n - 1- '- i rJJ i IC• i cat yy]] 1 c((• 1 1 i
Jt't�liiE t+b S 1 .1 •,}1J1 {_'l .l!tkl L,C`ii } �],j: vi.u4 r t,�.i'}L Ivik•!IJ 3 �l.vi�ki i!.1.7 i 11. Jt� i VaLS� , O. J.)
f{edt.ii 1 i l
L 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 3 i
i i � , i
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
i Flow
1 ..
fs
Segment 1 Reach I
Tributary Runoff 1 n : 00
i 0
1 CB
}....... 1 I, {.i..�i... ` i ..7 ..{ , 1
r t_: A.?,.J .{_1 1 ,`v .l:?l..t.�l i �.: n t.. 1
1135.000 0.000 i 0.00C.)
. Runoff flow
v.^is
in , t... i _.: ! f ++ .t l

'
SUMMER
MODEL FOR MARSHALL @ 0.4 MGD.
'
& RECOMMENDED
JOC LIMITS
| Sag # | Reach #
( Sag Mi 1
D.O.
1 CBOD 1
NBOD
1 Flow |
` 1 1
0.00
7'71
2.15
1.00
535.62
` 1 1
0.10
7.82
2.15
1.00
535.70
1 J.
0'20
7.91
2.15
1.00
535.77
1 1
0.30
7.99
2.15
0.99
535.85
1 1
0.40
8.07
2.14
0.99
535.93
1 1
0.50
8.13
2.14
0.99
536.00
1 J.
0.60
8.18
2.14
0.99
536.08
1 1
0.70
8.23
2.13
0.99
536.16
1 1
0.80
8.27
2.13
0.99
536.24
1 1
0.90
8.31
2.13
0.98
536.31
1 1
1.00
8.34
2.13
0.98
536.39
1 1
1.10
8.36
2.12
0.98
536.47
1 1
1.20
8.39
2.12
0.98
536.54
1 1
1.30
8.41
2.12
0.98
536.62
| Sag # | Reach #
1 Sag Mi 1
D.O.
1 CBOD |
NBOD
1 Flow |

w.�
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 21, 1988
MEMORANDUM
TO: Trevor Clements, Supervisor
Technical Support Unit
THROUGH: Forrest R. Westall
Regional Water Quality Su visor
r�J""
FROM: Michael R. Parker, Environmental Specialist
Water Quality Section
SUBJECT: Request for Instream Assessment
Judicial Order by Consent
Town of Marshall
NPDES Permit Number NCO021733
Madison County
Attached is an instream assessment to allow the Town of
Marshall to add additional waste flow to their wastewater
treatment plant. The Town has requested a Judicial order
by Consent and it is in the process of being submitted to
Raleigh for approval.
If you have questions, please call me at 704/251-6208,
extension 256.
MRP:ls
Enclosure �1?C�-p
APR
r AIRR
.,d c ape.,
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, P.O. Box 370, Asheville, N.C. 28802-0370 • Telephone [phone]
7 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

r Request Form for in -stream Assessment for 67B
NAME OF FACILITY Wa i- M19AX14�I ---- SUBBASIN�
C 0 U N T Y JWd,�,or�------ REGIGI4 � ��(�-- DESIGN FLOW -69t
RECEIVING STREAM-Fj q,p ,� 4-----------------
_ - It
x�A-----'�'��------
BACKGROUND DATA :
A. Why is SOC needed? (Facility is out of compliance with which
effluent limits?)pj,w
B. history of SOC requests:
1. Monthly Average waste flow
prior to any SOC--y-_©� a t� _ mgd
Time period averaged -y�% thru a
2. Previously approved SOC's:AfeNv
Date: flow:
O mgd
Date: -_ _- f low:
total of previously approved SOC flow:---- O -mgd
3. Flows lost from plant
(facilities that have gone
off line)
4. Current SOC request
5. Total plant flow post-SOC
(sum of original flow and
SOC flow minus losses)
f low: 0—mgd
f low: - Q_p�P-mgd
f low: _— O _Z0 0.-mgd
6. Is this an accurate flow balance for plant? Why/why not?
yes..S:ec-
w°w 1 P desirw c4Vycd� 8s, 000 9p'�
ax. / a Sk, 00 oI p �.
N Aw" c v.vovec,4, ors 30, 00 01 Pl
P�
iteccv Guw7-)0 dexi' c�1�A�.Yl ' s(-v0,

C. Please attach DMR summary for past year for all permitted parame•-
ters..If possible,. include reports, from previous years if
facility has been under SOC for more than a year.
CURRENT-SOC_REQUEST :
A. Request is for domestic. or. industrial waste? If it is a .combin-
ation, please specify percentages.
2) O P%441 G. '0 d1 ,
u
B. What type of industry? Please attach any pertinent data.
C. The region proposes the following sOC limits:
I
BODS .90 mg/1
NH13 _- - _mg/l
DO; - - -mg/1
T S S _-,�0 -m g/ 1
fecal coliform _#/100ml
pH-----6=0 ✓ '!. d —=S U
other parameters
D. WhZLt is the basis for these limits?
-14,r-m- AA,- Neel
/ G.t1M �lP�tet /M�Tj0�0� CvAlCWt^1 /N