HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120285_03_Qual_ICE_Chapts_8to11_Figures_031609_20101222PY(tiirtgl
• 7la
�
Figure 10.1
Gaston
E-W Connector
Farmland
and Prime
Agricultural
Soils
April 14, 2008 L. Murphy
G A S T O NGASTONCLEVELANDCLEVELAND
M E C K L E N B U R GMECKLENBURG
Y O R KYORK
UV161
UV55
UV557
£¤321
UV160
UV273
UV27£¤321UV279
UV274
£¤321 UV274 UV279
§¨¦85
§¨¦85
£¤74
UV216
§¨¦77
§¨¦485
Legend
Limited-access Highway
Major Roads
Gaston E-W Connector Alternatives
County Boundaries
ICE Study Area
Difference in Travel Time with Project
11 - 15.25 minute reduction
8 - 11 minute reduction
5 - 8 minute reduction
3 - 5 minute reduction
1 - 3 minute reduction
0 - 1 minute reduction
Figure 11.9Gaston E-W ConnectorTravel TimeChanges (2030)With and WithoutGaston East-West Connector
The Louis Berger Group
January 15, 2009 L. Murphy
0 3 61.5 Miles
Ü
This data was generated using theMetrolina Travel Demand Model, which calculated the difference in average travel time from each location with and without the proposed Gaston East-West Connector. Darker colors indicategreater travel time savings.
Data Sources: 2006 MetrolinaRegional Travel Demand Model,The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
Lake Wylie
York County
Gaston County
Mecklenburg
County
£¤74
")20 ")40§¨¦85
£¤321UV279
UV274
UV273
§¨¦77
UV160
£¤321
£¤321
UV27
UV55
UV161 UV557
UV274
UV274
UV279 ")30
")10
Legend
Limited-access Highway
Major Roads
Gaston E-W Connector Alternatives
County Boundaries
Figure 11.10Gaston E-W Connector10-Minute Travel TimeIsochrones for2030
The Louis Berger GroupApril 14, 2008 L. Murphy
0 2.5 51.25 Miles
Ü
Travel times are shown for destinations near the eastand west ends of the project(origins are green dots).Red line is 40-minute isochrone, illustrating maximum typicalcommuteshed.
Data Sources: 2007 MetrolinaRegional Travel Demand Model,The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
Lake Wylie
")40
York CountyGaston County
Mecklenburg
County
£¤74
")10
§¨¦85
£¤321UV279
UV274
UV273
UV160
£¤321
£¤321
UV27
UV161 UV557
UV274
UV279
")30 ")20
East
West