20211374 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20230221

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? *
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
2/21/2023
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20211374 2
Is a payment required for this project? *
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Zachary Thomas:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY 3120 Mid Pines Road
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
1b. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
2/21/2023
Nearest Body of Water
UT to Swift Creek (Yates Mill Pond)
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS-III; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.7385
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.7007

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
Please provide the date of the previous submission.*
9/14/2021
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 18 - Minor Discharges
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Nathan and Megan Anderson
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 017141 / DP: 02578
2c. Contact Person:
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
Yes No
Yes No

2d. Address
Street Address
5313 Penny Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Raleigh NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27606 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Hamlin
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0782838815
2c. Project Address
Street Address
3120 Mid Pines Road
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
UT to Swift Creek (Yates Mill Pond)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-III; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
2b. Property size:
3.78
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Neuse

3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011002
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The Site is comprised of a mixture of pine -dominated forested areas and cleared areas. An overhead transmission line runs from the northeast corner to the southwest corner of the Site.
The topography of the Site ranges from +/-404-424 feet above mean sea level. Land use in the vicinity includes agricultural land, rural residential, land in timber management, and
undeveloped, forested land.
A permit application to permanently impact 17 LF of stream and temporarily impact 10 LF of stream was approved by USACE on October 27, 2021 (SAW-2021-01985). It was later
realized that wetland impacts were not accounted for in the culvert extension area; therefore, this revised application includes the wetland impacts.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
SAW-2021-01985
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.108
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
273
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the Project is to construct a driveway from Mid Pines Road to access upland portions of the Site for a single-family residence. Installation of a utility line for individual septic
is also proposed.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The proposed Project includes construction of driveway to access upland portions of the Site for a single-family residence. The proposed driveway will involve the improvement of an
existing access road and extension of an existing CMP. Permanent impacts to wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers will result from the driveway improvements and culvert extension.
Temporary impacts to the stream will result from installation of the septic line to reach the septic system area. Permanent riparian buffer impacts will also result from installation of the
septic line and grading in Zone 2. Heavy equipment typically used for construction projects will be utilized (e.g., backhoes, bulldozers, etc.).
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes
Comments:
No O Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-01985
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
David Gainey
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
PJD Issued 10/27/2021
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? *
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Buffers

2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1
Culvert extension
P
Headwater Forest
WA
Yes
Both
0.002
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.002
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.002
2i. Comments:
Proposed permanent wetland fill impact for a driveway crossing totals 0.002 acre. No temporary wetland impacts are proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
1 - Driveway - Culvert
Extension
Permanent
Culvert
SA
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
17
(linear feet)
S2
1 - Driveway - Septic line
installation
Temporary
Dewatering
SA
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
17
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
27
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
10
3j. Comments:
Total proposed permanent stream impact due to extension of an existing culvert are 17 LF . Total proposed temporary stream impact due to dewatering
to construct a septic utility line are 10 LF.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
Neuse
Catawba
Goose Creek
Other
Tar -Pamlico
Randleman
Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Perpendicular Road Crossing & Grading in
Zone 2 - Deemed Allowable
P
SA
No
1,664
2,019
New Stormwater Conveyance - Deemed
Allowable
P
SA
No
269
0
Perpendicular Septic utility installation (10-ft
wide) - Deemed Allowable
P
SA
No
600
482
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
2,533.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
2,501.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
2,533.00 2,501.00
Total proposed permanent Zone 1 impacts are 2,533 SF and proposed Zone 2 impacts are 2,501 SF as a result of a perpendicular road crossing,
grading in zone 2, septic utility installation (10-ft wide corridor), and a new stormwater conveyance from an SCM that will comply with a stormwater
management plan reviewed and approved under a state -approved local government stormwater program.

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation O
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed driveway crossing is aligned to cross channel as perpendicularly as possible and is along an existing access drive/culvert. The residence
was positioned to avoid fill in wetlands and streams. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental
additional impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from stormwater runoff.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Equipment
will be parked and cleaned in uplands away from jurisdictional areas. Work within jurisdictional areas will be conducted during periods when dry weather
is predicted, and large bare areas of soil will be reseeded and protected as soon as practicable. Silt fencing and sediment basins will also be used to
prevent sediment runoff into the stream and wetland areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Total proposed wetland and stream impacts are below mitigation thresholds. Buffer impacts are considered "Deemed Allowable" per the Table of Uses.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
The Project proposes to construct one single-family residence and widen an existing driveway to access the home.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
0,1
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Per the NC DWQ April 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale residential development projects have a "low potential for cumulative
impact" since the project already in a developed landscape (i.e., existing residences and development in the vicinity) and the area already contains the
necessary infrastructure (i.e., sewer, water, electricity, etc.). The project drains to UT to Swift Creek (Yates Mill Pond), which is Class WS-III; Nutrient
Sensitive Waters (NSW), (i.e., not HQW or ORW). We anticipate the NCDWR will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
An individual septic tank is proposed for this Project.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) database, eight threatened and endangered
species and one Candidate species are potentially present on the Site. Habitat for red -cockaded woodpecker, Neuse River waterdog, Carolina madtom,
Atlantic pigtoe, dwarf wedgemussel, and yellow lance is not present on the Site. There are no open stands of older pines on the Site. The intermittent
stream on -site does not provide adequate substrate and hydrology for the aquatic species. Potential habitat for Michaux's sumac may be present within
the overhead transmission easement on the Site, but these areas are periodically maintained. Forested areas on and nearby the Site may provide
potential roosting habitat for the tri-colored bat (Proposed Threatened). Potential habitat for monarch butterfly (Candidate) is present in the open areas
on the Site. There are several ponds of sufficient size to support foraging habitat nearby the Site; however, no visible signs of bald eagle habitat are
present on the Site. The NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database report (dated February 6, 2023) indicates no known occurrences of
threatened or endangered species on or within 1.0 mile of the Site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper
The proposed Project is in Wake County which does not contain any Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
NCSHPO HPOWEB Map Service
The Site itself is not listed as a historic property. There are three historic properties located within 1.0 mile of the Site based on a query of the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO) database. All three are listed as "Surveyed Only Property". Figure 4 depicts the locations of these
properties in relation to the Site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? *
FEMA Flood Map Service Center
Panel 3720078200K, effective on 07/19/2022
Miscellaneous

Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
NWP 18 Request - SAW-2021-01985 - 3120 Mid Pines Road.pdf
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
ATTACHMENTS
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1-USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2-Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3-PJD Wetland Sketch Map
Figure 4-NCSHPO Map
IPaC Report
NCNHP Database Report
SAW-2021-01985 404 Approval and PJD
Impact Map
2.93MB
Signature O
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kimberly Hamlin
Signature
0,6e #00,
Date
2/21/2023

SAGE
%W-1
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST.
2016
February 20, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn: Mr. Lyle Phillips
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: 3120 Mid Pines Road
Request for NWP 18
Sage Project #2021.070
On behalf of Mr. Nathan Anderson and Ms. Megan Anderson (applicants and owners), please find attached a
complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) that the activities associated with the proposed development of the 3120 Mid Pines (Project)
may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18. Proposed impacts are below notification thresholds designated
in General Certification (GC) 4249 and riparian buffer impacts are Deemed Allowable; therefore, a courtesy copy
is being provided to the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR).
A permit application to permanently impact 17 LF of stream and temporarily impact 10 LF of stream was approved
by USACE on October 27, 2021 (SAW-2021-01985). It was later realized that wetland impacts were not
accounted for in the culvert extension area; therefore, this revised application includes the wetland impacts.
Project Purpose and Location
The overall project is a single-family residence. Site. The +/-3.78-acre tract is located at 3120 Mid Pines Road,
south of Raleigh, in Wake County, The coordinates of 35.7385,-78.7007 generally correspond to the center of
the Site.
The Site is comprised of a mixture of pine -dominated forested areas and cleared areas. An overhead
transmission line runs from the northeast corner to the southwest corner of the Site. An existing roadbed parallels
the southern boundary of the Site. The topography of the Site ranges from +/- 404-424 feet above mean sea
level (msl). Surrounding areas are rural with a mix of farmland and undeveloped wooded areas.
Project Detail
The purpose of the Project is to construct a driveway from Mid Pines Road to access upland portions of the Site
for a single-family residence. Installation of a utility line for individual septic is also proposed.
The proposed Project includes construction of driveway to access upland portions of the Site for a single-family
residence. The proposed driveway will involve the improvement of an existing access road and extension of an
existing CMP. Permanent impacts to wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers will result from the driveway
improvements and culvert extension. Temporary impacts to the stream will result from installation of the septic
line to reach the septic system area. Permanent riparian buffer impacts will also result from installation of the
septic line and grading in zone 2. Heavy equipment typically used for construction projects will be utilized (e.g.,
backhoes, bulldozers, etc.).
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
database, eight threatened and endangered species and one Candidate species are potentially present on the
Site. Habitat for red -cockaded woodpecker, Neuse River waterdog, Carolina madtom, Atlantic pigtoe, dwarf
wedgemussel, and yellow lance is not present on the Site. There are no open stands of older pines on the Site.
3120 Mid Pines Road Page 1 of 3

The intermittent stream on -site does not provide adequate substrate and hydrology for the aquatic species.
Potential habitat for Michaux's sumac may be present within the overhead transmission easement on the Site,
but these areas are periodically maintained. Forested areas on and nearby the Site may provide potential roosting
habitat for the tri-colored bat (Proposed Threatened). Potential habitat for monarch butterfly (Candidate) is
present in the open areas on the Site. There are several ponds of sufficient size to support foraging habitat
nearby the Site; however, no visible signs of bald eagle habitat are present on the Site. The NC Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) database report (dated February 6, 2023) indicates no known occurrences of threatened or
endangered species on or within 1.0 mile of the Site.
The Site itself is not listed as a historic property. There are three historic properties located within 1.0 mile of the
Site based on a query of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO) database. All three are
listed as "Surveyed Only Property". Figure 4 depicts the locations of these properties in relation to the Site.
Project History
Mr. David Gainey of Sage Ecological Services, Inc., performed a wetland, stream, and riparian buffer delineation
to identify ecologically sensitive areas on the Site prior to the design phase. A permit application to permanently
impact 17 LF of stream and temporarily impact 10 LF of stream was approved by USACE on October 27, 2021
(SAW-2021-01985). It was later realized that wetland impacts were not accounted for in the culvert extension
area; therefore, this revised application includes the wetland impacts.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed driveway crossing is aligned to cross channel as perpendicularly as possible and is along an
existing access drive/culvert. The residence was positioned to avoid fill in wetlands and streams. Construction
fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing
will be installed to provide additional protection from stormwater runoff.
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any
accidental additional impacts. Equipment will be parked and cleaned in uplands away from jurisdictional areas.
Work within jurisdictional areas will be conducted during periods when dry weather is predicted, and large bare
areas of soil will be reseeded and protected as soon as practicable. Silt fencing and sediment basins will also be
used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream and wetland areas.
Project Impacts
Proposed permanent wetland fill impact for a driveway crossing totals 0.002 acre. No temporary wetland impacts
are proposed. Total proposed permanent stream impact due to extension of an existing culvert are 17 LF. Total
proposed temporary stream impact due to dewatering to construct a septic utility line are 10 LF. Total proposed
permanent Zone 1 impacts are 2,533 SF and proposed Zone 2 impacts are 2,501 SF as a result of a
perpendicular road crossing, grading in zone 2, septic utility installation (10-ft wide corridor), and a new
stormwater conveyance from an SCM that will comply with a stormwater management plan reviewed and
approved under a state -approved local government stormwater program.
Mitigation
Total proposed wetland and stream impacts are below mitigation thresholds. Buffer impacts are considered
"Deemed Allowable" per the Table of Uses.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Respectfully submitted:
im &Im
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
A4tSean Clark 0
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3120 Mid Pines Road Page 2 of 3

Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1-USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2-Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3-PJD Wetland Sketch Map
Figure 4-NCSHPO Map
IPaC Report
NCNHP Database Report
SAW-2021-01985 404 Approval and PJD
Impact Map
3120 Mid Pines Road Page 3 of 3

SAGE
ECL7LOGI CAL
ICES
LA
jl+
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name:
Address:
Phone: ! _
�
' — J?� 5`7 C
Email:
Project Name/Description:
3120 Mid Pines Road
Sage Project #
2021.070
Date: 1
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899_ I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site.
BY: V� 114 ,1!' BY:
Print Name of Landowner or Signature of Landowner or
Legal Representative Legal Representative

a
d O
�RVON �� a
_ R
C
C
FOOD Ov
o �
v �
o'
0
1
A[.r Hill
Conference
' Center Pond
S�Rt�G 6L�FF5,t4
AfrJ�
4: r
1
11
�A
J'
InaN L-UL.auVII
GRANVILLE
L FRANKLIN
ORANGE DURHAM
NASH
WAKE
CHATHAM
W LSON
JOHNSTON
LEE HARNETT
Map Legend
QProject Study Area
N
0 625 1,250
Feet
W q4 p
s r lrrJ� r
7 4 9 fJ
z { OF 2u Z
U
Q
0
L3
•r a 14
� Zy
rMs �_T RP o 4P�-
o a`
� NlYrSnMr. s-r
PHeirlIR 6p
3
.' � HASIS'S7
A
yts z ,ANfICId sr
q RI rHVME t7
OR 84L GILSERF l'VAY
FeatureA -
[ 7-77 Rp
AfaAL
USGS Topo Map
Map Information:
Figure 1
Service Layer Credits:
ram.
3120 Mid Pines Road
USGS The National Map National Boundaries Dataset
3DEP Elevation Program
Sage Project # 2021.070
Geographic Names Information System
y
National Hydrography Dataset
SAGE
National Land Cover Database
National Structures Dataset
Lake Wheeler, NC Quadrangle
National Transportation Dataset
USGS Global Ecosystems
USGS Topo Mapserver 2021
Bureau TIGER/Line data
US.Census
Data
RoaMay
19, 2021
Natural Earth Data
Y
U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
N OAA National Centers for Environmental Information
Office: 919-335-6757
U.S. Coastal Relief Model
Cell: 919-559-1537

AgC Me AsC2 4n I� r �1. rr CgC2
= As AsC2
Me ' As84 _- G' ,
R Ce
AsB AgC �AsB �;� r•" �
•C e D {.
AgB -
,qgC f Ap D r A982 T.
W y Agc _ :
pp
1 h'
y, Ch As82
Ceff ,
gC f' Age-, rr '�l' ?� ApI32
GeB2 e�C2 ' AgO
W y ft '' ASB2
APD
Ins ASC2
e '* t
e �l
g
\ A r3 D r, F
CgC
-�_GIB - 3 a WY AsC2 r
Ile, AsC 2
A s B� f `
t= As Feature A
l i n
AgB Cea CeD • ■ Li:
CeB2 AgB2-
f k na AsCl-
r" r A sB2
_ m CgB A4C2 ? Ce
ApRt- i r
M e ., Ap DAl
CeB2
�APD AsB2 CeB2 •` � �.
As WoAs 1
C e W n *k AgB s B a, •� n ;� CeC2 Age
AgB f 6 0
rt]
AgC i ry
CgC2 f 1 w 't q '', i CeCL s•~ s�
PSG woad
WME r ''
LOS ' A, 6 CeC2 P -
= rrIAI
rviaN wL.auvi t
GRANVILLE
L FRANKLIN
ORANGE DURHAM
NASH
WAKE
CHATHAM
WILSON
JOHNSTON
LEE HARNETT
Map Legend NRCS Soils Map Map Information: Figure 2
Project Study Area 3120 Mid Pines Road NRCS Soil Survey Wake County 1970
Sheet # 68
N Sage Project # 2021.070
May 19, 2021
0 500
1,000
Feet
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office:919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

NOTE: Features depicted herein must be
field verified by the USACE and/or the
NCDWR, or its delegated authority, before
being valid. Location, shape, and size of
depicted features on the evaluated site are
approximate and should be surveyed by a
licensed NC surveyor for final site planning.
Potential Non -wetland WOUS
- - SA +/- 273 LF
Potential Wetland WOUS
WA +/- 0.95 ac.
Map Location
Orange
Chatham
Lee
Durham
Wake
•
Harnett
Franklin
Johnston
Nash
Mapudy Area
0 Data Point Location
Potential Wetland WOUS
Potential Non -Wetland WOUS Marginal Stream
Culvert
Contours
PJD Sketch Map
3120 Mid Pines Road
Sage Project # 2021.070
May 19, 2021
0 30 60
Feet
Map Information:
Wake County GIS Data 2021
NCDOT GIS Data 2021
NC OneMap Imagery 2017
Figure 3
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

- ❑illprprD t m
r r o
N
p_ow r--
G
day
alrbanac .. Drilarly
rxboo s y P DID Dr
t° a 4A
❑4rh et n G � r
4r C�a 60 \ w6�'
.
n
,e � atey C'r
^ ;beac"
%d
`C, Vn 3 Ti,� on
to
�hrr
Macedonla
Country F 0
1
e54 Rp
woadard t-n V
s
3 �
Mrsry x
� o
G a Thistletc
rn
� CJ
r �
eo
n
U
bo' c
A'J15
rn
c
m
o`
C7
3 Tryon Rp
g' Plia Par
kp
� r
Yates Mill Trl
a
��
c
�Cir
Gps,� Z cif
�o r a ss G:
try rn
❑'' y et
a
G
Srerra
`6se
l
Dr
rge�errpD tty Rd
A `Yin P� �oair,:eO
Stowe
we
den �r
-
cb
LIn
L. ta4r
4�
S'o
JCarolina
sr74ella Ds \
e/ w r R�nrs9are S! Pnes Park
ca Rhamkatte Community
Center G, errr
�r
Rhamkatte
j WA8134
s
ti `gyp
�„ Alder Ridge LnYergregn
Ave
Compa�6
Ko-4
t
A
"`YYY �
9� b
e s� �0
Lost Ln �p� Way
o Kd .
n'S'd
�.' J�O
N v m
-�
e
ieg��
hill
gelrY Pl P
`
4
�c o
�a
c S dta�
o
r
y
_ a Q`ne G`1
f�ti
0
N
5
Y
r7 Q'
J ❑
U7 S
= u
- a
y n
a e Dr
Betha�'
a
North Carnlin
State Unrvers!
Yates MO
Pond Park
Fairway Acres eru�e
t�
�h
Ra
c
House rs
House
WA-R150
�
FWA-R149
/
Chi Rd
Analysis Way
v
a
k
a
Coefz.00�
;. p2i alp„
o
�pas3me W
m
u
P
m
R
Dairy Ln
Ma Location
P
Ma Legend
NC SHPO Map
Map Information:
Figure 4
g
'0
GRANVILLE FRANKLIN
Project Study Area
3120 Mid Pines Road
NCSHPO GIs Data 2021
RANGE DURHAM
Q 1-Mile Project Buffer
N
Sage Project # 2021.070
NASH
• Surveyed Only Property
WAKE
May 19, 2021
CHATHAM
W LSON
JOHNSTON
LEE
0 1,000 2,000
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
HARNETT
Feet
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/SMQMSWT5NRHXT'HNX3...
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust
resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project
area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project
may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -
specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the
defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS
Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
C��
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Servicesr
o
[phone]-
l(
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
1 of 8 2/6/2023, 12:07 PM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/SMQMSWT5NMXTHNX3...
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence
(AO1) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected
by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may
indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can
change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects
to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species
which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted,
permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement
can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or
from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official speci
list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species! and their critical habitats are managed by the Eco o ical Services Program of the U. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries?).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 14
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or
proposed, for listing. See the Listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mamm
NAME a< STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered
Wherever found
N,o critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
i s-0
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
2 of 8 2/6/2023, 12:07 PM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/SMQMSWT5NMXTHNX3...
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/speci es/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/speci es/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.g v/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon ndang
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
fps://ecos.fws.g vo /er /species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your loca n doe n erlap the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.Ms.gov/ecp/species/4511
Insects
NAME V STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https7//ecos.fws.gov/ecp�/s-pecies/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
3 of 8 2/6/2023, 12:07 PM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/SMQMSWT5NMXTHNX3...
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats
should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gcov/pL gram/migr ry it / pecies
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.g v/li r ry/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-
i ncidental-take-migratory-birds
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-
conservation-measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and
how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every
bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds
in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on
your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and
abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atrntic Coast birds, and other important
information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory
birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to
be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME _% 0 BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because
of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Pl
Black -billed Cuc Coccy s I rythropthalmus Breeds May 15 to Oct 10
This is a Bird of C servatio oncern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska
lean —Warbler Dendroica cerulea
is is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferu!
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Breeds Apr 28 to Jul 20
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
4 of 8 2/6/2023, 12:07 PM

INC: Explore Location resources
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/SMQMSWT5NRHXT'HNX3...
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
,,,,
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This
information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you
read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory N*rd Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular
week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and
the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability
of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of
any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values
fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no
yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the
10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is
areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much
5 of 8 2/6/2023, 12:07 PM

INC: Explore Location resources
more sparse.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/SMQMSWT5NRHXT'HNX3...
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort
— no data
SPECIES
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY JUN JUL AUGS♦EPP
OCT
NOV
Bald Eagle
T
l
iDEC
ji
Non -BCC Vulnerable
Black -billed Cuckoo
1TT
tttt
T11
tttt
till ttttI I I I I I I I J"'
11TT
T
TT
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Cerulean Warbler
tttt
I
tttt
tttt
to
II
IM ++++ I I I I I I I I tttt
tttt
tttt
tttt
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide
Ht
++++
11+
1111
IIII IIII IIII IIII ml
mo
++++
++t+
(CON)
Eastern Whip -Poor -will
tttt
tttt
tttt
++
1l1l 1111 l I l I I I I I
I I I I ttTT TTTT TTTT TTTT
I I I I
TTTT
l
TTTT
TTTT
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Kentucky Warbler
BCC Rangewide
t��t
�
����
.I■ I■
��■■
II II I I I ll II
I I I I ��TT I TTT T�T� I I I I
����
II
T���
����
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
�H
Ottll
iii
III I II II }Il■I }II }II I I I'l 0
004
��t�
+��t
- t
BCC Rangewide(CON)Ht
Prothonotary Warbler
Ht
�H
I
44
1 I I
11 I I I I I I I I I I I TTTT
TTTT
I-T I I
�t�t
BCC Rangewide (CON)
�
Red-headed Woodpecker
y
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Rusty Blackbird
111
+ITT
1l
�+T I
lyyy
TTT
11 +
Ht
I I I III
t-4� �t* TTT T� 14 I I
l
4
y11
+TTT
ly
T��
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush
Ht
+H
44
0 I
III I I 1 1 11
-I I 1
IIII
44
44
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Tell me more about conservation
measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts toiigratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation
Measures describes measures
that can
help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year
round.
Implementation of these
measures
is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When
birds may be breeding in the
area, identifying the locations
of
any active
nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when
birds are
most likely to occur and
be breeding
in your
project area,
view the
Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable
depending on the type of activity you are conducting
and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in
your project location. N
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).. The AKN data is based on a
growing collection of survey-, banding and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the
10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Lagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may
occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This
data is derived from a growing collection of survey,lianLling, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability
of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these
graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your
location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your
results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be
nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
6 of 8 2/6/2023, 12:07 PM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/SMQMSWT5NRHXT'HNX3...
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including
Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for
eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy
development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the
birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help
avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area
off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may
be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA
NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf
project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models rel n
survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and
studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report 01
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your
list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the
migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort
(indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If
the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar
means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying
what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might
be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures
to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your projecttctivities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit
the FAQ "Tell me about consery tion measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird
trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination'
conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
7 of 8 2/6/2023, 12:07 PM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/SMQMSWT5NRHXTHNX3...
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or
other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Wetland information is not available at this time
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very large projects that intersect
many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of
these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and
geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of
the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the
collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon
boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used
to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries
and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm r fse)have also been excluded from the inventory. These
habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
LL
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in
this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state,
or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning
specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
00,0 1 C)
�O
8 of 8 2/6/2023, 12:07 PM

■�r'f NC DEPARTMENT OF
Nor III
JUKE NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
No I
February 6, 2023
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE. 3120 Mid Pines Road, 2021.070
Dear Kim Hamlin.
Ray Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-20814
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butlerWncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMCNT OF NATURAL. AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
4] 121 W JONES STREET, RALEI01_ NC 27603 - 1651 MAIL SERVICE CFNTEP. RALEIGH. NC 2761*
OFC !Dig 707.9120 • FAX 919.707.412,

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
3120 Mid Pines Road
Project No. 2021.070
February 6, 2023
NCNHDE-20814
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present, it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name
North Carolina State University Agricultural
Owner Owner Type
North Carolina State University State
Research Land
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on February 6, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q4, Winter (January)
2023. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
3120 Mid Pines Road
Project No. 2021.070
February 6, 2023
NCNHDE-20814
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
cientific Name Common Name
Group
Observation
i
Date i�
Dragonfly or
32043
Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
2004-Pre
Damselfly
Natural
37962
Dry Piedmont Longleaf ---
Community
Pine Forest
Reptile
39359
Ophisaurus attenuatus Eastern Slender Glass
1974-06-04
longicaudus Lizard
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name wner�
North Carolina State University Agricultural North Carolina State University
Research Land
Historic Yates Mill Pond County Park State of North Carolina
Historic Yates Mill Pond County Park Wake County
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement Triangle Land Conservancy
Element
Accuracy
Occurrence
Rank
IL
H?
5-Very
Low
D
2-High
H
4-Low
Owner Type
State
Federal
Status
State
Local Government
Private
State
Status
1
Significantly
Ra re
Global State
Rank Rank
G5 S2?
G2 S2
Special G5T5 S1
Concern
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on February 6, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q4, Winter (January)
2023. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

February 6, 2023
Managed Area (MAREA)
0 Buffered Project Boundary
Q Project Boundary
NCNHDE-20814: 3120 Mid Pines Road
Rharnkatte
+yi
oft Tryon Rar
i
Sources: Esn, Airbus U5, USGS, NGA NASA, CGIAR, N Rabinson, NCEAS,
NLS, 05. NMA. _O&taslyreI-n, Rgkswafe L-1. GSA Gealand. FEMA,
Inlermap and the GIS usef wmmunity
Saurces� Esri, HERE. Garmin. FAO, NOAA, USGS, 0 OpenStreelMap
c iributars. and Me GIS User Community
Page 4 of 4

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-01985 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Lake Wheeler
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: In Situ Studio
Matt Griffith
Address: 704 North Person Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Size (acres) —4 acres Nearest Town Raleigh
Nearest Waterway UT to Mud Lick Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.7385
Longitude:-78.7007
Location description: The project site is on the west side of Mid Pine Drive, located at 3120 Mid Pines Road in Raleigh, Wake
County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the permanent discharge of fill material within 17 linear
feet (0.007 acres) of stream channel and the temporary discharge of material within 10 linear feet of stream channel.
Applicable Law(s): © Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: NWP 14. Linear Transportation Projects and NWP 18. Minor Discharges
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
Conditions, your application signed and dated 9/14/2021, and the enclosed plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or
deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class I administrative
penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide and/or regional general
permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided
it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide and/or regional general permit authorization
expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the
nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon
the nationwide and/or regional general permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the
date of the nationwide and/or regional general permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been
exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior
to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits. If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact George Lvle Phillips III at [phone] X25 or George.L.Phillipsnusace.armv.mil.
Corps Regulatory Official: ��✓ e' ✓ (.-- Phiu [it Date: 10/27/2021
Expiration Date of Verification: 3/18/2022

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished: Colleen Cohn — NCDEQ-DWR — 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609

Action ID Number: SAW-2021-01985 County: Wake
Permittee: In Situ Studio, Matt Griffith
Project Name: 3120 Mid Pines Road Property
Date Verification Issued: 10/27/2021
Project Manager: George Lyle Phillips III
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: George Lyle Phillips III
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
or
George.L.Phillips@us ace.army.mil
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

N/F
BETH LYNN CALLOWAY
DB: 16468,PG.2622
PIN#0782-84-6168
(VACANT)
`o,
s U
• o
0
o�
0
0
I N/F
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DB:2609,PG.83
PIN#0782-62-2867
(AGRICULTURE PRODUCTIVE)
o LANGDON, DAVID
\ GERALD & CLELLIE M.
' DB:03191, PG.0776
PIN#0782-94-2045
\ (RESIDENTIAL)
SEPTIC FIELD BB
BE DESIGNED/BY
/ OTHERS oo�
�• 161
N/F�� / \
ANDERSON, NATHAN & MEGAN
/ D6:17141, PG: 2578
�. PIN#0782-83-8815 S S
(VACANT)
dop
TOP OF
\ BANK r�
N //A
0
N/F
BETH LYNN CALLOWAY
DB: 1 6468,PG.2622
PIN#0782-84-8172
(RESIDENTIAL) '
EX. 24" CMP
� o
0
i
I
VICINTY MAP
SCALE: NTS
GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, AND THE STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE NORTH CAROLINA ONE
LIMITS OF CALL (1-800-632-4949) LOCATE ALL EXISTING
DISTURBANCE / UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DEPTH
OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER
CHAMPION, OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS PRIOR TO
POLLY J. BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
DB. & PAGE:
20-E-3447
N/F
PIN#0782-93-2643 3. BOUNDARY AND PROPERTY INFORMATION IS TAKEN CHAMPION, POLL- (RESIDENTIAL)
DB &PAGE: 20-E-3447 FROM A SURVEY BY TURNING POINT SURVEYING,
PIN#0782-83-8670 PLLC, DATED MAY 17TH, 2021. ADDITIONAL PROPERTY
(RESIDENTIAL) INFORMATION TAKEN FROM CITY OF RALEIGH & WAKE
COUNTY GIS.
4. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO A.D.A.
STANDARDS.
0 80 160 240 3210
SCALE: 1 " = 80'
AS �CAi? f
SEAL
4r It )) t 4, 2,
Zw
z
Ov0
J
0
rn
VJ
QQf
Q
O:f U
O
LL_
Er W
cn =
W
Q
:2
Q
Z
cl
ZI I I
W
W
�
Q
� J
IOf
cf)
U
o w O
z n1 M
w
�
Q Z T
U
O N Z
0 <
Co
W
n% Q
0
o 0
W
CL
Q
U
Q
<
Z
Q
41
P7 Q
U 0
cn
z
100Lo 0)
w
LoI'- N N
w
-aO'tcV
z
0 0r�Lo0)
nr-0-c
CD
o0 00
z
W
U
>
W-o
U
to
a�
LLJ
C)
■■■
� 0
I—�Q�OLLw

PERMANENT �\
ZONE 1
IMP\ \\� CT
300ASF
1
N F I
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA I I I ^ I
DB:2609,PG.83
PIN#0782-62-2867 I
r �
(AGRICULTURE PRODUCTIVE) 1 I I I
19 I I
III I
II� �
a ^�
� I N
I C I I M
� I
I,
\ \ SEPTIC FIELD TO /
\ BE DESIGNED BY
OTHERS
. A �N/F
— STREAM �� \ \ I ANDERSON, NATHAN & MEGAN /
CENTERLINE \- \ DB:17141, PG: 2578
\ �\ ( -�y ��� • \ PIN#0782-83-8815
(VACANT) /
PERMANENT \ \ \
ZONE 2IMPACT
200 SF
PERMANENT r ) \
ZONE 1 J A \ °�
\ \\ 00ACF
PERMAN�NT
ZONE 2 TEMPORARY -NO \ /
IMPACT \ PERMANENT
256 SF \ \/ LOSS 87 SF10 LF
\
/ TOP OF' \ PERMANENT STREAM
BANK IMPACT 314 SF17 LF
\
EXTEND EX 24"• CMP •
TOP OF
a �
BANK
I f �
I w-
w�
o
f_
405
e• E
Ol
f
III � �' �� � � • �
PERMANENT
1 ZONE 2 PERMANENT
/IMPACT ZONE 1
1,215 SF IMPACT
° e / 1,063 SF
°
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
SEE IMP-1.2 FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE.
15.4 LF AND INSTALL
NEW FLARED END
� o
m
aA
00, E 406
405 v\
�� PERMANENT — PERMANENT
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
IMPACT IMPACT
1,071 SF 612 SF
EX 24" CMP
EXISTING INVERT OUT: 401.34
CONC. ENCASE JOINT
AT EX. PIPE END EX.
INVERT: 401.77
10
s
o � R's o^
dop
CA
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
IMPACT KEY
ZONE 1 IMPACT (2,734 SF.)
ZONE 2 IMPACT (2,283 SF.)
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
(314 SF.) (17 LF.)
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT
I M PACT
(87 SF.) (10 LF.)
SCALE: 1
/\ :0 120 160
i , ____
F1� IGA 1/jIl
k� 01
SEAL
zW
Z
Ov
0J 0
O:f
rn
VJ
Q
Q
O:f U
O
LL.
Er W
U) =
L�.I
w
Of
�z
—
C)
I I I
Z W
C'
LLI
�
� J
po Of
N
U
z O LJ
N M T
z
: •
Q Z T
\
0 N Z
0
W
<
co
OfN 0
Q
w
CL
Q
u
C)
<
Z
Q
N
r� Q-
U 0
cn
IL
I00Lo0)
W
LoI,- N N
W
-0O'tN
z
0 0r_1Lo0)
�0'Nnr-0_c
00 00
z
W
O
0� C 0) 0)
O
J
NZO)0) V)
j
LU -o
U
to
N 0
6�
■■■
_� 0
I—�Q�OLLw

0+
EX. 24" CMP
EXISTING INVERT OUT: 401.34
(TO REMAIN)
EXISTIN(
EX. INVERT OUT
401.34
Id
I
O
C TI
0+43.1 �3C
6
0+3 9
_---
NEW INVERT IN: 402.14
O
0+50.0
/ o
$-AND
EXTEND EX. 24" CMP 15.4 LF
INSTALL NEW FLARED END
MAINTAIN EX. 2.4% SLOPE
6
/
%
CONC. ENCASE JOINT
AT EX. PIPE END
•�
EX. INVERT: 401.77
I
n+r,n
U+UU COLLAR U+SU
RADE
NEW INVERT IN
402.14
3IN NEW SECTION OF
CMP MAINTAIN 2.4%
APE (15.4 LF)
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. PIPE EXTENSION WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH OVERALL PROJECT EROSION
CONTROL SEQUENCE. THE PIPE EXTENSION
SHOULD NOT BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL ON -SITE
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE
BEEN INSTALLED.
2. WORK MUST BE SCHEDULED DURING A PERIOD
OF DRY WEATHER.
3. INSTALL CULVERT EXTENSION AND CONCRETE
ENCASEMENT.
4. REWORK STREAM GRADE TO NEW INVERT.
5. INSTALL NORTH AMERICAN GREEN-TENSAR
ROLLMAX C350 MATTING PER MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDATIONS ALONG DISTURBED STREAM
BANK. RESEED DISTURBED AREA ALONG STREAM
BANKS AND IN BUFFER AREA WITH A WETLAND
GRASS SEED MIX. PROVIDE STRAW OR MULCH
FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL OUTSIDE OF
STREAM BED.
SCALE: HORZ.
VERT.
III
1" = 20'
1" = 2' ( >
�,A CAi? r
SEAL
fd* , elmEF'4, ..
EL
zW
Z
Ov
J
O:f
rn
VJ
Q
Q
O:f U
O
LL.
Er W
U) =
Lj
I ' I
W
0-
Q
QVJ
Z
c,
Z LLJ
C�
w
< Ir
ON J
I <
10-
po Of
N of
N
U
�C4 M
z Z T
0 U
O N Z
w
Q
co W ofn%
0
o 0
w
w
Q
U
(n
w
<
w
Q
N
r� Q-
U 0
w
-i 1 00 Lo 0)
w
Lo I- N N
w
-aO'tN
z
0�Lo0
0
CD
�D Nnr-0_c
00 00
z
w
U
@
J
a�zrnrn V)
>
w�
U
FUG
OWN
a�
■■■
i_- D'OILW

i.00 Ae
I / BETH LYNN CALLOWAY \ \
i DB:16468,PG.2622 l
/ PIN#0782-84-8172 °
(RESIDENTIAL) /
MOP
N/F
SEPTIC FIELD TO BE BETH LYNN CALLOWAY DESIGNED BY OTHERS
\ — - ��
DB:16468,PG.2622 / ° /
PIN#07 6168
'VACANT)
°
v e°
O
A
��0'/�F`
\ s
�09 ITB
O
\ VICINTY MAP
SCALE: NTS
\ \
DB:17141, PG: 2578 / � \ \
PIN#0782-83-881 61
dop
s
1
i'
'I°
N/F o^
` ANDERSON NATHAN & MEG
Co
\,
\
/ (VACANT) / \
0A 6\ ° A A
EX. WETLANDS i / / `O top /
vv
I "��/ °�l/ i dw
TOP OF
BANK // o�
GENERAL NOTES
�A.
GA
••.f
EX. 24" CMP
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
N/F
CHAMPION, POLLY J.
DB & PAGE: 20—E-3447
PIN#0782-83-8670
(RESIDENTIAL)
1. ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE CITY OF RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, AND THE STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL (1-800-632-4949)
LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS
PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
3. BOUNDARY AND PROPERTY INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY TURNING
POINT SURVEYING, PLLC, DATED MAY 17TH, 2021. ADDITIONAL PROPERTY
INFORMATION TAKEN FROM CITY OF RALEIGH & WAKE COUNTY GIS.
4. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO A.D.A. STANDARDS.
0 60 120 180 240
SCALE: 1 " = 60'
IcARa
DiriSSln�!��•
X SEAL
34981
G«I�'�'• .
z W Z
o C)
0o
QOf
V, cr U
O Er W �H
w�
a_ w�a_z
a
QV ,
ZI I I C�
W W
a J
� N N
� NOO W
CO
C
co
L
CDU-U
=)—Lc) ZT
Q CD
C
uj
0 .. Z
CN
o cvoo
t
wNN
QEj(
o
� o o' o'
0
Q
U
(n
Z
+,
N
O �
r� Q-
0�
U 0
1 00 Lo 0)
W
-i
0_ Lo I- N 0
LU
-0O'tN+
Z
0 0rl�00 N
U
�0'Nnn_c
Z
U
p
c:
0_ G)0)�
p Lp��
J
NZ0)0 cn
>
LU -o
r
F-- O
U) 0
LLJ
z� 0w C)
I- 0' 0 LL Ld

N/F
STATE OF NORTH CAROLIN
DB:2609,PG.83
PIN#0782-62-2867
(AGRICULTURE PRODUCTIVE
\ \ or
PERMANENT
ZONE 1 \
I M PACT I
300 SF
I
05 �77
\ SEPTIC FIELD TO
\ \ \ \ BE DESIGNED BY
\ OTHERS
`` \ \
\\ \ \ `
STREAM � °A V�
CENTERLINE S
S
\ � PERMANENT \ \
ZONE 2
PERMANENT IMPACTZONE 1
00 CT 200 \ F \ \ o
\
TEMPORARY —NO \
v I ' `� PERMANENT
a PERMANENT'' LOSS 89 SF
ZONE 2 ` 10 LF .IMPACT/
2S�� \ x
EX. WETLANDS �J A
TOP OF' \ EXTEND EX. 24" C M P
BANK `y 15.4 LF AND INSTALL
PERMANENT
ZONE 1 NEW FLARED END` \
IMPACT `�
269 SF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT 261 \
y o�J NSF (17 LF)
01
I N, TOP OF y y`
BANK
WETLAND IMPACT (66 SF)
NUT.\
LD
1 ° PERMANENT
\
1 IMPACT PERMANENT
ONE 1
� J 1,487 SF IMPACT
top 742 SF
/ CONC. ENCASE JOINT -
/ off° o�J AT EX. PIPE END EX.
INVERT: 401.77
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
SEE IMP-1.2 FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE.
os
?5 PERMANENT PERMANENT
\ ZONE 1 ZONE 2
I M PACT I M PACT
922 SF 532 SF
EX 24" CMP
EXISTING INVERT OUT: 401.34
Q,
N/F
ANDERSON, NATHAN & M N
DB:17141, PG: 25
PIN#0782-83-8 5
50' EASEMENT
PER DUKE
ENERGY
\ o^
9 /
\ d`
/ � S
/asNr
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
IMPACT KEY
ZONE 1 IMPACT (2,534 SF.)
ZONE 2 IMPACT (2,501 SF.)
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
(261 SF.) (17 LF.)
PERMANENT —NO PERMANENT IMPACT
(89 SF.) (10 LF.)
W y EXISTING WETLANDS (4,697 SF)
WETLANDS IMPACT (66 SF)
/\ :• 120 160
�_�_
awl
�\\\k ICAR0 z,
0F�5SI��!���
:Q SEAL
34981
z W Z
o C)
p O
Q Of
z crU
L, W cn =
W Of
a_ W ELZ
m C) V ! 2
H I I I
Z W OLLI
a- < Er 4 —J
Of N N
U,
: NOR W
zRmm �T
L
CD
QR�
1
C
w
o cCN voo
v' v'
w
QEj( o�
U
O
0
Q
U
Z
+,
N
O �
r� Q-
0�
U 0
100 Lo 0)
W
_
0- Lo I- N 0
LU
-0O'tN+
Z
0�00)
0 N
O
�0'Nnn_c
Z
Li
O
N C
L L 0] 0)
J
NZ0)0) cn
5;
LU -o
LLJ� X�
I� Ow p
I__ 0' 0 LL Ld

0+
EX. 24" CMP
EXISTING INVERT OUT: 401.34
(TO REMAIN)
EXISTIN(
EX. INVERT OUT
401.34
Ild
F
F F
r-0+43.1
NEW INVERT IN: 402.14
F 0+50.0 -
EXTEND EX. 24" CMP 15.4 LF
AND INSTALL NEW FLARED END
MAINTAIN EX. 2.4% SLOPE
CONC. ENCASE JOINT
AT EX. PIPE END
EX. INVERT: 401.77
i
n+nn n+gin
U+UU COLLAR U+SU
RADE
NEW INVERT IN
402.14
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. PIPE EXTENSION WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH OVERALL PROJECT EROSION
CONTROL SEQUENCE. THE PIPE EXTENSION
SHOULD NOT BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL ON —SITE
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE
BEEN INSTALLED.
2. WORK MUST BE SCHEDULED DURING A PERIOD
OF DRY WEATHER.
3. INSTALL CULVERT EXTENSION AND CONCRETE
ENCASEMENT.
4. REWORK STREAM GRADE TO NEW INVERT.
5. INSTALL NORTH AMERICAN GREEN—TENSAR
ROLLMAX C350 MATTING PER MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDATIONS ALONG DISTURBED STREAM
BANK. RESEED DISTURBED AREA ALONG STREAM
BANKS AND IN BUFFER AREA WITH A WETLAND
GRASS SEED MIX. PROVIDE STRAW OR MULCH
FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL OUTSIDE OF
STREAM BED.
3IN NEW SECTION OF
CMP MAINTAIN 2.4%
APE (15.4 LF)
SCALE: HORZ. 1 " = 20'
VERT. 1 " = 2'
0 20 40 60 80
xA IlA R
i Irll��.i
:0- SEAL
34981
i GIN
zW Z
Ov Q O:f
rn Q
O VJ O:f U
L, Er W cn =
w�
Q z
:2 Q r�1 �
�J J O
— _
Z w w
ON J
10- < Ir I <
po Of
� N N
NOO W
�N
Qom
C
w
C)
I\ .. Z o cvoo
wNN Elf�
QEilEin
L
O
Elf Elf
0
Q
U
U)
0
Q
Z
V)
41
r� Q-
Q�
U 0
1 00 Lo 0)
W
-i
0 01•N 0
W
-aO'tN�
z
W 0 r-,
O
0D N0000-
Z
L
p
�_
c
p �p -- L_
J
NZO)0) cn
>
W_0
O -
U, �� 8
I� 0 p
I— �D'OILW