20230263 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230213

I I
1••l
DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? *
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
12/8/2022
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20230263 1
Is a payment required for this project? *
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone] Andrew Pitner:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Henderson Grove Industrial Warehouse
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Danielle Clark
lb. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
dclark©harthickman.com [phone]
Date Submitted
2/13/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Town Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.625297
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-80.508616
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Rowan
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Thomas 0 Eller et al. / Nancy Bostian Shue
2b. Deed book and page no.:
784/831 & 784/831 / 802/669
2c. Contact Person:
Brooke Bures
2d. Address
Street Address
PO Box 1765 / 710 Peach Orchard Road
Address Line 2
City
Salisbury
Postal / Zip Code
28145/28147
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
United States
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Brooke Bures
3b. Business Name:
Trammell Crow Company
3c. Address
Street Address
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 300
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Raleigh NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27601 United States
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Danielle Clark
4b. Business Name:
Hart & Hickman
4c. Address
Street Address
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Ste 301
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27607
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
United States
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
Of epproprote)
N/A
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Salisbury
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
5658-01-16-5137, 5658-01-15-9477, and
5658-01-15-1249
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
2b. Property size:
95.7
State / Province / Region
Country

3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Town Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401030301
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The Site consists of three parcels of land located west of Henderson Grove Church Road in Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina. The Site currently exists as undeveloped land with a
high transmission utility right-of-way in the southeastern portion of the Site. A sewer easement is present in the northwestern portion of the Site. The surrounding area consists of
undeveloped, residential, and industrial property.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2.65
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
3,814
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The project proposes to develop an industrial warehouse development to serve the City of Salisbury and surrounding areas.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The planned development area will be graded with heavy equipment to prepare a level building pad. A stormwater BMP is included.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes
Comments:
No Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request was submitted on February 15, 2022 and is
currently pending.
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? *
Dan McCauley
Hart & Hickman
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
Buffers
2. Wetland Impacts

2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition *
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Fill/Grading
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
WAD
Yes
Corps
0.442
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.442
2i. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.442
The permanent wetland impact involves grading and fill required to construct a warehouse building and associated parking lot.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Fill/Grading
Permanent
Fill
Stream Channel "C
Intermittent
Corps
2
Average (feet)
240
(linear feet)
S2
Fill/Grading
Temporary
Fill
Stream Channel "C
Intermittent
Corps
2
Average (feet)
13
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
240
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
253
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
13
3j. Comments:
The permanent and temporary stream impacts involve grading and fill of Stream "C' required to construct a parking lot and driveway crossing.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
See attached
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
See attached
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
0
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(square feet) (acres)
0 0.88
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
0 0

4h. Comments
The wetland with proposed impacts has a WAM rating of medium quality, thus the applicant proposes a 2:1 mitigation ratio for 0.442 acre of impact.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) O
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
The project is not located in a State buffered river basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Salisbury
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 28 .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed site plan will develop the majority of the parcel and additional development is not anticipated. Additional phases and/or impacts to Waters
of the U.S. are not planned or proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater will enter City of Salisbury sanitary sewer infrastructure and will be piped to an off -site City of Salisbury wastewater treatment plant.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No

5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? *
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
DEQ Natural Heritage Program and Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) on-line databases and on -Site reconnaissance
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
The National Registry of Historic Places and NC State Historic Preservation Office databases and on -site reconnaissance
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? *
Reviewed FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ID #3710578100K
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Henderson Grove Industrial Warehouse (NWP#39) PCN Application.pdf 13.88MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Dan McCauley

Signature
Dar i{`'auzr�
Date
2/13/2023

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 4: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Henderson Grove Industrial Development
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The property developer is proposing the development of an industrial warehouse building on the Site and is seeking verification to use
Nationwide Permit #39 to impact on -Site streams and wetlands.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Trammell Crow Company
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Danielle Clark - Hart & Hickman, PC
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: None
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Henderson Grove Church Road, Salisbury, NC (Lat/Long: 35.625297,-80.508616)
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 5658-01-16-5137, 5658-01-15-9477, and 5658-01-15-1249
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Rowan
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Salisbury
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Town Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03040103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit 4 39
Regional General Permit 4
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Via Email
February 10, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Attention: Mr. Chris Hopper
Re: Pre -Construction Notification
Industrial Development
Henderson Grove Church Road
Salisbury, North Carolina
H&H Job No.TCD-003
Dear Chris
On behalf of Trammel Crow Company, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is submitting the
attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) application for the proposed construction of an
industrial development in Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site).
The Site consists of three tax parcels (Rowan County Parcel ID Numbers 5658-01-16-5137,
5658-01-15-9477, and 5658-01-15-1249) that total approximately 95.7 acres. H&H is
submitting the PCN application in order to receive verification to use Nationwide Permit
(NWP) #39.
H&H submitted a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request to the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) Charlotte Regulatory Field Office on February 15, 2022. As of
the date of this report, the PJD is still pending. The PJD request package is attached in
Appendix E.
There are four streams on the Site: Stream Channel "A" (SCA), Stream Channel "B" (SCB),
Stream Channel "C" (SCC), and Stream Channel "D" (SCD). SCA originates off -Site as a
perennial stream and conveys drainage to the northwest, through Pond "A" before flowing
off -Site at the western Site boundary. SCA totals approximately 1,510 linear feet of on -Site
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd , Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847A241 main

Mr. Chris Hopper
February 10, 2023
Page 2
area. SCB originates as an intermittent stream at a headcut at the downgradient section of
Wetland Area "G" in the northeastern portion of the Site. SCB conveys drainage to the west-
southwest before transitioning to a perennial stream, flowing west-northwest and eventually
exiting the Site at the northern Site boundary. SCB totals approximately 1,400 linear feet of
on -Site area. SCC originates as an intermittent stream at a headcut at the downgradient
section of Wetland Area "D" in the central portion of the Site. SCC conveys drainage to the
north-northwest before transitioning to a perennial stream, continuing north-northwest and
eventually reaching a confluence at SCB in the north -central portion of the Site. SCC totals
approximately 397 linear feet of on -Site area. SCD originates as an intermittent stream at a
headcut at the downgradient section of Wetland Area "F" in the eastern portion of the Site.
SCD conveys drainage to the west -northwesterly before transitioning to a perennial stream,
flowing north-northwest and reaching a confluence at SCB in the northeastern portion of the
Site. SCD totals approximately 507 linear feet of on -Site area.
There are seven forested wetlands on the Site: Wetland Area "A" (WAA) through Wetland
Area "G" (WAG). The on -Site wetlands are bottomland hardwood forest wetlands with
ultimate discharge into Town Creek, located off -Site to the northwest. WAA encompasses
approximately 0.73 acre of on -Site area, WAB encompasses approximately 0.67 acre of on -
Site area, WAC encompasses approximately 0.45 acre of on -Site area, WAD encompasses
approximately 0.45 acre of on -Site area, WAE encompasses approximately 0.07 acre of on -
Site area, WAF encompasses approximately 0.22 acre of on -Site area, and WAG encompasses
approximately 0.06 acre of on -Site area.
There is one open water feature, Pond "A", in the southwestern portion of the Site. Pond "A'
appears to be constructed with a dam and receives flow from and drains into SCA. Pond "A"
encompasses approximately 1.20 acres of on -Site area.
The developer is proposing to permanently impact 0.442 acre of WAD and 0.011 acre (240
linear feet) of SCC, and temporarily impact less than 0.001 acre (13 linear feet) of SCC.
Impacts to WAD and SCC are proposed for the construction of a warehouse building and
14
hart hickman
https.//huthick.shuepomt.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - TCDITCD-003 Henderson Grove
Church Road/Permtting/02_Cover _letter.doc SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. Chris Hopper
February 10, 2023
Page 3
associated parking areas and roadways. Due to the NWP 939 mitigation threshold of 0.1 acre
for wetland impacts and 0.02 acre for stream impacts, wetland mitigation is proposed via the
NC Division of Mitigation Services In -Lieu Fee Program. The developer is not proposing
additional impacts to on -Site streams or wetlands.
H&H is seeking a Nationwide Permit 939 verification for this development. A copy of the PCN
submittal package has also been submitted to the NC DEQ DWR via ePCN.
14
hart hickman
https.//huthick.shuepomt.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - TCDITCD-003 Henderson Grove
Church Road/Permtting/02_Cover _letter.doc SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. Chris Hopper
February 10, 2023
Page 4
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact
Danielle Clark at 919-723-2516.
Very truly yours,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Matt Bramblett, PE
Principal
Julia McGuire
Asst. Project Environmental Scientist
Attachments
Danielle Clark, PWS
Senior Project Environmental Scientist
• PCN Form
• Figure 1 — Site Location Map
• Figure 2 — Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map
• Appendix A — Agent Authorization
• Appendix B — Wetland and Stream Impact Map and Previous Conceptual Site Plan prepared by
Osborn Engineering Group
• Appendix C — Avoidance & Minimization
• Appendix D — Supplemental Documents
• Appendix E — Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request
• Appendix F — Mitigation Acceptance Letters
• Appendix G — NC WAM Form
cc: Ms. Brooke Bures, Trammel Crow Company (via email)
Mr. David Starkel, Orbborn Engineering Group (via email)
hart I hickman
https.//huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Masteram Projects/Trammell Crow Company - TCDITCD-003 Henderson Grove
Church Road/Permitting/02_Cover _letter.doc SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Pre -Construction Notification
Industrial Warehouse Development
Henderson Grove Church Road
Salisbury, North Carolina
H&H Job No. TCD-003
February 10, 2023
hart -.4 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

a`'c� wArE�o�
O '4411::� ^Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Henderson Grove Industrial
2b.
County:
Rowan
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Salisbury
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Thomas O Eller et al. / Nancy Bostian Shue
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
784/831 & 784/831 / 802/669
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
PO Box 1765 / 710 Peach Orchard Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Salisbury, NC 28145 / Salisbury, NC 28147
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Property Developer
4b.
Name:
Brooke Bures
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Trammell Crow Company
4d.
Street address:
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 300
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
4f.
Telephone no.:
512.202.6589
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Danielle Clark, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Hart and Hickman, PC
5c.
Street address:
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
5658-01-16-5137, 5658-01-15-9477, and 5658-01-15-1249
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.625297 Longitude:-80.508616
1 c.
Property size:
95.7 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Town Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
Yadkin Pee -Dee
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Site consists of three parcels of land located west of Henderson Grove Church Road in Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina. The Site
currently exists as undeveloped land with a high transmission utility right-of-way in the southeastern portion of the Site. A sewer easement is present in
the northwestern portion of the Site. The surrounding area consists of undeveloped, residential, and industrial property.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.65
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,814
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project proposes to develop an industrial warehouse development to serve the City of Salisbury and surrounding areas.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The planned development area will be graded with heavy equipment to prepare a level building pad. A stormwater BMP is included.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
roject includin all rior hases in the ast?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments PJD request submitted on February 15, 2022
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Dan McCauley
Agency/Consultant Company: Hart & Hickman, PC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request was submitted on February 15, 2022 and is currently pending.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill/Grading
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.442
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.442
2h. Comments:
The permanent wetland impact involves grading and fill required to construct a warehouse building and associated parking lot.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill/Grading
Stream Channel "C"
INT
Corps
2
240
S2 T
Fill/Grading
Stream Channel "C"
INT
Corps
2
13
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
253
3i. Comments:
The permanent and temporary stream impacts involve grading and fill of Stream "C" required to construct a parking lot and driveway crossing.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Not Applicable
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
Not Applicable
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Not Applicable
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Appendix C
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See Appendix C
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.88 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
j 0 acres
4h.
Comments: The wetland with proposed impacts has a WAM rating of medium quality, thus the applicant proposes a 2:1 mitigation ratio for 0.442
5.
acre of impact.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Not applicable.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Not applicable.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
22
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Water quality treatment provided via wet pond located on western side of site to collect and treat runoff from
all proposed impervious areas.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Salisbury
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Salisbury
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑X Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes 0 No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
[]Yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes 0 No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed site plan will develop the majority of the parcel and additional development is not anticipated.
Additional phases and/or impacts to
Waters
of the U.S. are not planned or proposed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
will enter City of Salisbury sanitary sewer infrastructure and will be piped to an off -site City of Salisbury wastewater treatment plant.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
DEQ Natural Heritage Program and Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) on-line databases and on -Site reconnaissance (See USFWS and NCWRC
responses in Appendix D).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The National Registry of Historic Places and NC State Historic Preservation Office databases and on -site reconnaissance (See
SHPO response letter in Appendix D).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Reviewed FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ID #3710578100K
D UM)g-
Danielle Clark
02-10-2023
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Appendix A
Agent Authorization
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Agent Certification of Authorization
1, Brooke Bures , representing the prospective developer of lands represented by
Parcel Numbers 5658-01-15-9477, 5658-01-16-5137, and 5658-01-15-1249 in Salisbury, Rowan
County, North Carolina (approx. 95.69 acres), certify that I have authorized Hart & Hickman, PC
to act on the prospective developer's behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing,
issuance, and acceptance of a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and 401/404 permitting for
this property.
Prospective Applicant's Signature
Name/Title: Development Manager
Company: TCC
2.7.22
Date
Agent's Signature
Danielle Clark, PWS
Hart & Hickman, PC
1-1?5-1?m,?
Date

Appendix B
Wetland and Stream Impact Map prepared by Orsborn Engineering Group
Previous Conceptual Site Plan prepared by Orsborn Engineering Group
hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

GO
x
Lu
U
CL
E
ate)
Ln
Cz
c
m
a)
a)
>
O
(7
c
O
0
v
c
a)
=
0
t
x
Lu
bD
v q
- i
to
0W
_
p
m s
E U
Q>
m o
Ln
cvi (7
mc
O
N
O U
N -O
C
(1)
O =
`n
r m
D O
N
�
a) j
LL d
/ /
/� II // / /
/ / ' /
// I //I`\ / I
r// ,,ter' i I I \/ \/ / /-' ,/ / //
/ r- \�\ I I / I / / / / // ' \ I \ -\ i �/ , -\\-\ \ - _ -_- -_- - /
(ij/ it r , \I i I 30' Pl>IBLIC SANITA J / / / , / --- -\- �/i ^` r \\ ,`(\ l 'i i� \-\ , �\,\ �` �_ _ `\` `` `\ \ ` \ ` \ \ \ \ \ 1 ,
{ f I SEW R EASE�V]EdQT / / ------ - - \ v \_- � , \---__1- - _ - \- \ -\-- \\ \- \ \ \ !/�`\ l — /
\11
\• - /` I ' 1,r,1-�l�/ --_-\� -- \\` _� — �`„ ��\ /� �% //' - / ,\/ -// , \ \ \\ \\\\ \\ `\ \\\ \\\ \ `\ \�;\\ , N� —)`� �/ I �1 ___ /1 ] il, i � `_ /^\ ) L/���/! (\`� Y �� I \ II111' \\` 0
-� - \ / / �' / / . ' \ \ `\ \ \ \ \ ill /
-==_\ 1\ \ 1 ° 1 �i / / �' � -�_-- _-�- ��� \ / _/ / / / _�/ r _/ I \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ - \ Z \\ \ / r 1
-)il i EXISTING WETLAND AREA - - \ \ - ----- \ r-+••��- ���r-� �, \ \\ \ \\ \``` ,\ \,\\\\ \\\ _� `�� ( — — _ r I `�---1/�- /���t I \\��t 1 _ — i
- 119 1 - - — - - I I
-\__'/ �/ II I \ , \ / \ 1 1 I / / / , \ \ T\, ��- ice- : .-I l �_/_ -, I �1
//'' i v' I Il I (n til I 11/ - � _��_ - \ `\ -\- _ \�\ \ � � I I 1 I I / / �/ //' /`--' ---�_/ \ \\ \\ \\ \ `\ \\ `\\ \\ \ \\ \ \ f � ` -
`\� \ \- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ! / 1 jj 1 �T
' I I 1 , / / ��'_----- - ��\ - - �- \\ I I / / / J \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -\ \ 111 `� J�
/(/ l / ----- `-\\\\`�\ \ - - ---- \ I / / / /, \ / ( \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \ \ I \ \ \ \ \\ \\ �\ - \\ II 1
JI I I / ---_ \ \ \ - \ \ ^I \ \ I I I I / / /l / — I \ \ \ \ \ \-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\\ \ \\ \\ ` �.( �
-7`��/� 1 \ 00
! i- --- - \ `\ -\ \ 1 I 1 \ \\ I I / / /' l ^ _ / 1 \ \\ \ \ \ \ -I- \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ ` \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` II I v c\I
/ \\ / / ---- _ \\ \ - - - I : II EXISTING / / ,/ J ------ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ I 1� 1V � r
\ I I / , \ , \\ \\ \ \ 1 / / / /� / / / \ `\ �` ,I \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ '\ ,\ II 1� 'Ail \Ln
`` \ // ' _ \ -- \ \ \ / / / r\ ,WETLAND AREA ---' / - i \ , \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
tit I \ I I I I �} / // y / / --_ -\ \ -`\ - - \\\ \ / \ \ / / \ \ 1 / \ \ \ _ \ \ \
/ )I 1 I I 1 I / /, /, - -_ \\\` \ P/ / I l ` I \ I ( % f / - - / / \ \ 1 \\ \ \ 1 \ \_ \\ \" , \ \ \ \\`\\ II I1-.(t9�'Q
+ \ \ \ �\ ) , I \ \ \ _ I
01
yl r�\ _ _
_ \ \ Z
�;�\ 11, III I I / / / // / ---- '--' - - \\- \ \ \ \\�\� \\ \ \ \ \ `, \ \ /' EXISTING WETLAND \ �`- \\ \_ - \ ` \ \ - �\ 1iL o
r / /\ / /I / / / / /\ _ _ — --- _ �\ \ \ \ \ ` . -- \ \ • \ \ — �\ \ _/ AREAS \ \ \_, \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / \ \ \% I
Ilr \I (lo n / - / / / / / _ '`--`_ \ \ `� \ \ ,\\ - \ r - \\ \ 1 - \ \ \ \ \\ -/\ ) - \\ V I 1 \ I / ---- i _ - \ \ / - \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ `\ \ \
/ / / / /' \ \ \" \ \ - \ � \ \ \ \ _ I f i \ \ \ \ \ O' ^
\V \\\ \Q\ ) / / // /// / //r/ / / / _ --_ - \\\ \ \\\\\\ \ \ \ \ ` `\ \ t \1 l / \ //^l/ 1\ \ I -\i _ - __ /i,' '��'' /s \ , \\ \\ \\ \ \
y ,W if 1 / / f/_ _ // // / l f% / / f - - _ - \ \ \ \ , \ - \ � `\ / \ 1 ( I) 1^ / / - /I �.. _--- / / // _� / - _-_'- /) ` \ 11 - ,( W
\ / I / / �/ / / / ' \ \\ \ \ \\ - , \ \ - \\ \\\ \ - 1 I / I 1 / / , \ \ 1 \ I _ _ � _ �- / ' ' r / \ \ \ \
- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / /
// / / /ru / I / WET POND / / / _ \ \ \ \ \ \ I) - / \ \ ! --- ' - "I I/ / / Ji l Z
/ /r �/I /IV / / / / \ \ \ \ IIIII \EXISTING STREAMS \ \ /1, _I 1 r / / ---'- /\_ - r C / �� 1\1 %1
// / r I _ / / / / / / ' / \ \ \ \\\` \ \_\ III 1 / f \ \ \ 1 \ \ \_-_ \ `-//''/ / // i --_-- I 1 /' , 5 / c / - //T
I \ _ I 11 / I \ \ - \ \ /, / /i / / / _ J I l / /
(I //1, �, / // / / / / / / / _ \ 1 \ \ I 1 \ / \ \ \ _-- _ - \ \\_--
i -� ( - J l l _ / /
// / / / / / / / I / ' / / , \\ \\ \ ` II IIIIII I' I 1 1 ` \ \ \ \\ _ _ - `\ \ \ ��-=%1� �- \\\\\ r / , , /' / , , /
(I// I I l / II I / / / / / / l / / / ' / / \ ` \ I1. III I / ,\\ C I \ - -\ - \--- r � � \ � \_-' ///' ' i` -- - \\\ \ \ \ / / / / )I / / _ / / / _ �/ II 1 I /
/� / I / // ' / / ` \ / / / / 10 — ' /' / \ ` \. —^� —\r-- / I/ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ — , I� / / , — \\ \\\ `�\ I EXISTING STREAMS / ,' — — I I
pq
/ / / I \ \ Z �/ r%'/ I , \ \ ' ' ' / �J /
\U I / / r / / I \ \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ / , I \ - l /
1 \ \\\ �� -\ / / \ \\ / / i \ l� ♦ / 1 I \ \ \ / / / / 1
/ \\\\ \\\\ / / /I /, I \ \ \ 1 I I ( � \ ( / // - ' \\ \`�'�\�-\\ `� _ _ 1 /J �� _ _ `' %� _ I \\\ 1 1 I / I / // / /' / ' r, / / I I 1
Z'- 1 /
UUI
\ \\ I r \ \ \ � \ \-\ I �' / '-- - _ - ` r //�/ ,_ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT _�\\ \ \\ 1 I I I I 1 r/ ` I-- -� �\ __
J \ \\ I ( I \�\ \\ \ \ �\ \ I \ l_ I
_ IIII 111 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � _ / \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ , / -'/ ~_---- J / \\ \\ 11 / / I
It
IN /
yy \ \ / \� \`\ \A"A r / / \ t- \-\ \
/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - 1 l \ \ %- \ ! / / / i 1 - / \ \ \
` �" \ \ I i r\ I - - \\ ,\ \ \�\ i 3' WIDE BY 2' DEEP FILTERED / /'' \ \ \ - - EXISTING \
I \ \ \\ \ \� \ \\ _ 1 \\ r- - I I /
f \� _ I/ r / ` \ \\ \ _ \ / / \, \\\ \\`` \\\ r I TRENCH DRAIN INSTALLED IN THE i \ - \ \ I ` \ `, r / F. /
/� �l I ' / \ \ l p / / // ,-� �:\ I \ \ \ - - . _ - / I ^`\ III \ \ \---- - /
,- I /J 11 l \ \ -` \\__ / 1 1 - \ \ I (1' /// / / \, \�\ \ \ \\\\\4\%\\, `) I , III I I AREA OF STREAM IMPACT / ,J \ ` \ \ \\ IIIII \ -\ \ \ -WETLAND AREA _-/) {I� I O /
I \/ ! - ` i / / - _ \ `\\ `\ - \ _ ,` \' / / / \\ \\ I I / -ll -\ \\ \L`\\\\ \ \\ \ \-\---- a� �� / rI /IIII /
I /A \ / \ \ \ - \ / \ \\ _ - I I / /
/ / / / /-- / \ - \ \ \ %� \ \ \ 1 \ \
/// \ ,' / -/ - // / // -`� \\\ - \ \ \ \ \\ L / / ` '\_ \ \ \1rf I I I SEE DETAIL 1 THIS SHEET. - \ \ \` I I I \ \`l, \ \\ \\ - \ I -\ \ \ / / I I I
/ - - \ \ \ \ 1 I ) \ / \ \ \ \.0 / / / / \ I /
1 V / / \ I I / \ \\ IAV I \ \ t/ - \ \ \ \ \ % / ) / /
` - 1 / r� -' �-- r 1 \� L\ \\ ` ` \\ 1 \ I I \( , \\ \\ \\\II III I �� - - \\ `\\ \ \\ / ` \ \ - - ` \/1 / /' i // /' / / ) /) \ \ \ I / \ \ \ \ \ ' \ I /
//� / y / /' \ \ \ \ I \ / �\� \ \ \\\\\\ \ A, _ \ \ \ " / / (e / I I ( 0 /
r' / /--- 1 I L t
/ 1 / / I , �\ \ \ \\ \ I
'//I / \ - / \\ \\ \ I /
JI 11\ \ \ '\ \ /' I I I � / / \- \ \ \ UI 11 \ \ \ \ \ - \ I / /
\ PROPOSED BUILDING 1 ` / \ \ \ \ -,`_ /� % / O
/ < ---\) \ I \ 11 1 \ \ l ` \ \ \ \\ -\\\ I\ / / 310, 000 �I \ ` 1 r- r/ / / r/' \ \\\ \ \\ \ \\\ \\ \ \\ _\ / '-- \- - �r_J -� �//y / /J I I // / / / ---_
/ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ '\ —\ \/ —\ —/ 240 LF, 0.011 AC \ \\\� \\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \1 \ \I \ 1 _ / /,/ // / /`,/ / / / / I /
/ % \I \\\\ ;� i` \ \� \ `\ \ \\ \ — \\`\ \ c' ` r, STREAM IMPACT _ \ \\\ \\\\ \\ \\\ \ \ _ I \ \ \ \ \\ \ / � /) \ / // �' /' ,r / / /
\ \ � \ \ \ _,-_-- -_,- \ \ \ 1 1 . \ / / / / � d o
/ \ \ 1 \, \\ -\\\ .- \ \ \ / / / / /
/rJ 1 -\ \ 1\ I \ \ \ -I \ \ \ �V \ \ _ ( / v /' \\ \ \ - V \'' / / / / - / / /' / / I I � l / /
\ \ \ \ \ 1, \ \ \ \ \ \-- -\ - - 1 - \-ci / \ \\ \ r I I \ \\ - / / / / J,' / / ,, / / I /
/ ( \ y\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r \ \ \\ \ \ \ , / / \\ \ \\ \ \ \ �\ ' r/ \ 1 / ' / /
/ _, , --�- - , ` \ PROPOSED _ _ \ //II \ -� \ \\ \ /� / `\\\\\\\ \ \- \ -_ \ \ ( \ \ \ \`\\ \
%\/// ///I \� . \\ '__\1\i \� SANITARY SEWER_ ��- -' \1 ` - \\ \� r / - j/ - \ --__ - � - - - 1 /
,/ \\ /1 / /I� j
_ _ _ \ \ / /
,'/ I'/' ,,--EXISTING \ EAS, = �-\\ 1\ ��\%-\ `__\ -T�\ V _ l\ \ \ \` \\ \\ \ \\ , // \\1�`` ��- - - \-\\\\-` ` \ �,�
\\�� �`\ \\\`\ l ` rl J/ /( - l //
/ / 1' _-_, STR - r/- - \`\ I '\f \ -_\ '- \ \ �1 \ \ \ \ \ / \ / .\ \ �- \ `- < - _ \ \ \_`` 1 \ / // / / I / I
/ �\ >- -\ \ - PROPOSED BUILDING 2 \ '" r
/ __' ram`` - - '\ \\ \ _ -� \ sG`- \ \„ '�,I - - \ \l \ \ - \ /
/ ' / - `.r ^_- `` \ \` ' - \ / /- -- / �r1 ` �: \ ``\Y -\��\ Z� \ \ \ \ \ \ \- � \ / J r �11''I/ I \ \ \ - ` I \ \ I 1 \ ) _
/ __ \ - \ / /
. _-__------;i�\ \�\11 \ , i ` \� / � \ \\ \ ) /---\ 182, 000 SF �)II/, \ , , , \\\ 1, ! /, I S / / i -
,' / / / / / /' _' , � " \ � -% - \ __ `; \\c , r i�ii \ \ \ \ ` \ ` `\ `\ \ \ \ \I\ c / (/'I -_-`-- \\ \\_� � _ - '_' - \\` , -\\- / /� �' /,// / / I y \Towel l l� I /
--- -=-\ - l - \ \ I - / / /
/ \ , \ - `\ \_ -` ) J / 0.442 AC 19,253 SF) \\� \ 1 rJ �i i / - / / 1
/ / / / / / r---- - ��--\ / \\ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ � \ \ \ -, \ \ \ - i ^ /
/ / / /^I/\ \\-- -- �// \ \ \ / /
' ' /'/ r� ' /- \-\ _ - N - r` ',i/ \\\\`\- \ \`\ \ \ \ % _WETLAND IMPACT' " `\ \ \ \ I , I % / ( / / —
/' / /'/ / / 11 /// / ---- \ - --' \` \\- _-- \ j1''\ 1' J- \ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I � / ` \ \\\\\\ \ `\ l 1 I ( ( I I , / / I �� / / / T -
/ / __ - - _ - / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ _
,� / / J�/ / // / /' /� \\ - '-\___ \� �--- \- �--' / // PVC \ 1 \ 1� \\ \\ 1 \ �. 1 \ -\ \\ \\ , / \ / r -� I I , ` \\\\ \\\ \ \\`C \ \\� , I // - - I I / '/ / /
r / / / /' ' \ -- --,\ \; - `� (oPProximate. \ \ \ - I ^ I \\ \ \ \ \\ ` lye \ \ I / / �/ '/ ' / / '/ I /\/
/ / / -/' / / /' I '41, __ _ � `.� — \- --- - \\ ` / end not found \ O I \ k / / _ -\ _ I \ \\ \-\- \\ `/ ` / ' —
\ \ \ / tl / \
/ /' // / / / / -' / / /\ - - - - \ \ \ \\ POND \ \N \\ \ ` \ \ \ - \ \ \ \\ -\\ - / \ - I
/ - - - - \ \ I I / I \ \ \ / I 11 \ 10�' SLE�iTRIC¢(L
/ /' - ��,� \ -1 \ \ �\ -\ \ � I , \ \ \I I I \ �� \EAI EYENTi II �
I'/ / / / / /r-' ' \_- `-' _ '-/ --- -- - _ � (as of 1/12/2022) \ �\\\ \ ` \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ ` \ ` \ I I /
/ / r ,//'' / / r // /^ '\ _ \_, _-- EXISTING POND' \ \ 1 \\ \ \ \ \ \ r\ I \ I / I \ 1 \ , \\ \ /) I I / / ` /(
/ / / / i / /' / / / / / ). - �.. - / \ - 1'\ \ WL -752.s \ \ \ \ \ I I I / 1 \ 1 1 \ \ 1 I / I / I / )
,/ // ,/ / / /- / /- ` -- _�____
/ ------'--\--- ___\\ \ \__-` \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ -\\ \ \ 1 1 \ 1 1 I / /' / / , / / I / /
/ / I I \ UI / / / // �' _ I// i __ \\`\__ - \ \\� �` \ J `\ \ \\\\\\\\\ \ / I l \ \ \\ \ , I / /`- -' /' '�/ / - / 1 ( l I I�
_ _ / Imo/ / / / /' \ \ \ _ '
/ / \ / / / / _ / / / \ \ \I- I \ \% \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / r / /' // /
/ / Jr - / / I / / _ � \\ \ �— / - - \ \ \ \ \ \ I l
- - -�jk_�\\ r. -\____ \ - \S'
\ \ \ \ \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ I / / / i -1 \ /
/ Jl / I '-- - � / _ \ \5 _- -\\�j/ EXISTING i \` - � \ \ \ \ \ / - / / /- ---- r vl/ //I �__✓ / I I / / / / - / , ��-%� \\\—_\/j=,,--�-�-\ WETLAND AREAS' — \ \ \ \ `\-� - \-- - \\\ \ \ \ \ I 1 r / ��
/ i� 1 I / / / � - - � - \. � - \ \ - \ -\- \�_ \ \ �\\\ \\ \ \\ \ -- \ \_ \ \ \ �, I J � l I I \ r / __ / III � \
/ / \ / / / -- \ \ �'\ ) I / I / r -
- /- / / / - -- \\ - \ r��_`r\�_, _11/-\ \ _ ��-\-- --=\ \ \ -_\ \ \� \\ \\\\\\ \\\ \- \\` / \\- \-`\ \ Tower / I11 /
l / / I - / / i - \ \ ` � X` \__- ` ------_\ -� - \ \ \ \ \ \- \ / _ \ Jl / I I / I I I I / / / ' '�- I \
! / / / I I \ /' l (( / / / /--- -y\ /j-�1 �- `- \ 1\ Ij �\\\\ - _- \ \ �. \ \ \ \ \ \\ \` \ ` \\ \\ \\ - \ - \ \ \ \ 1 / I I 1 1 / / J
\ / -`\ -\ / / _-\\111%� d1 11�� �_ \ \�\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ ` \\ \ \- \ \ \- \ \ \ \ / Q \ 11�, \ / l I I l / / I
/ - -- - I L. 'I., - - - I \\ ) / �") \ I/ / \ I /
/ < ♦\ I / / � , \ / a -__ --- ,. , i --1LIi.// _ I IL/ - `--\ \\.\ ,\ \ I_ \\\ -\ r -1 ` \ \\- \ - -\ \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / III I
Ti
/ /.
\ \- \-. \ \ \ -\ \ \ \ \
--\ \ `- \ \�\ \``- \\\ _ ` \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ - -_---__�--_,
-- `-- --\\ \� \11 \ �/ ^`l/ _\\ \- _� \\\~l \/ \ ��\ \\ \ - \ \ \ \ - J , r I\ 1, -\\ 'll--\ \ \\ \\ / -
� �- --- -\ \\ \ \\\l\, , _ � / \ `- �� \\ 1 I \ \ \ �X \ \ \ - / ) l l I k, \ \ \..--I \\ ` 1 I 1 I I I /
\- \\` \ - \�- -- _ \dl'( ,\ \ x \\ \ / \\ /-j ` c\ ( ) I \ -\,'-1 � \ \ I 1 I / I
\ \ \ \ \ - --' / \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - / \ \z i __ I /
\-�� � \\ \\ ---� '`_ , -\ `\ \ \ EXISTING STREAM \\\\\ `\\\ `\\\ /' 11/ \\ \ ---' \_ , I I \ ( 1, J
\\ ` \ \ `--- \ // \ \ ` \ \ / / \ I I /
\ \ - O\\ \ `\/ \ \ \ \ / \ r- l- /
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ ` \ \_ ` \ \
-\ \ \\ \\\ \\ 1 \\ - -_ \__� C = -b,y \\\ �� ) \ \ \ \- \ \ \- \ \\ \\ -- \ \_- - ..i- --\ \ I I / I \ \ \------\__ \ \- \ j ) I \ � J f l l
i \\1 \ \\ \ `\ - �\ - \. \ \ ``\\-\\`\\\\ \_--------- \ I ( \ \ ` �_ \ I _\ \ I 1,1
` \ J 1 / l / J I
\ \ 1\ \\ \\ - \� �� �\ - - ,_N - \- \ -\ \ \ \\ \ \-\-\-\ ------------- \ I \/\ \ -\ \\- -\ _ \ \ /
\ ` -�\ -11 \ - ` -' - \ \ \��� \ - - \_\ - - -�-- \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \\ \\ //
\ \ /`/ 1 -"\ \ j--\--1 \`\\\\\\\ �\\yy\�-''=\\\ 1 11 --�-\ --\-__-----_-_\\-\\\\ \ I / \ \,
\- -\ -�^\• \"\ / I I / I 1
\ / /
\ \ \ \\ ) y\\ \ \-�^ \\ \ \ \\"I \ ` _ -�-,� \` -� ------ `\ \ ` / `- ` - \ I , \ ) \ \ 1 I I / 0 FO
\ \ \ \ \\� \ \ \ / \ - \\ ` \1-\t- c=\I / /J "./\ ' � - - ` -\ \ I l I I I 1 I \ -\ ` I \ \ / /' / I l I I 1 \
\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ ` LL --- ` � \\\\\I\ \� \I I // \ - -\- \ 7 \ ` / ) I I I 11 \ '\ )) -I / / // / I I / /
-\ \,,�-N .► ` \ \ '� \\ ) ^ ) (- /_ I / / / ./ / / / / / I I / / I /
/ ,-A / -1 \', \\�` I \ \-\. . . \ / .-`J /< -Vi' _ \tom \ ( i / / I I /@I I � �-'/// ~` i � l � l / I � i I // � I //
TOP OF BANK
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS WILL BE NECESSARY
TO CONSTRUCTION THE RETAINING WALLS THAT
ARE BEING USED ON SITE TO AVOID ADDITIONAL
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS.
2. THESE TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS MAY INCLUDE
RIPRAP INSTALLATIONS TO GAIN ACCESS TO THE
CONSTRUCTION AREAS.
3. ONCE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS IS NO LONGER
NEEDED THE STREAM(S) WILL BE RESTORED TO
PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS.
4. THE STREAM BED ELEVATIONS WILL BE RESTORED.
IF ANY STREAM BED MATERIAL IS EXCAVATED, IT
WILL BE STOCKPILED THEN USED TO RESTORE THE
STREAM.
5. DISTURBED STREAM BANKS WILL BE
RE-ESTABLISHED AND STABILIZED USING COIR
MATTING AND A RIPARIAN SEED MIXTURE.
100
2 STREAM BANK RESTORATION
NTS
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100 200 400
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
O
M
�_
Za
>
as
>M
E
,
W00M
Z)Nyr
U
a(9
(7
Z
W Q)
I
�Z
a
% LLB v
QHnL
C
i
LU
0 W
% Q O
0
�/
`
J ^
ZQa
O
3
3
3
OZ
W
xv
J
OOOOF
Ln
O
tD
a-
J
cQ
G
Q
Q[
0
Q
U
ci
O
a-
0
U
z
�U
w
U
z
O
\
LuQ�
O
D
m
z
o
100 ��
W
Q
�O/�
v /
=
z
W
W
0
Q
LU
..
o�__
Z
=
IL W
LU
LL
Z
_
H
U
!r
O
W
a
0
�:
r-i
L U
Q/
U
Z
V)
z
Q
W
�Ln
Ln
2i
2
L/)
LU
z
O
c
0
2
G
U
(V
0
Q
O
�Q/
LL
z
�__
0
Lu
0
z
Uli
O
\cr ... AR�<i,I/%
1 \ • \ONAL vaR,o •• 9 i
e 0
:�;aC-3139 z;o_:
i Q i : Qw�
• �J O
" ..•
c/NEEFW`
(n
z
O
(n
w
wl
a
0
JOB #
22036
DATE:
02/09/23
SCALE:
1" = 100'
DRAWN BY:
JAW
APPROVED BY:
JCO
WI-1
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY ORSBORN ENGINEERING GROUP, PA SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO ORSBORN ENGINEERING GROUP, PA.

SSMH I
RIM: 733.33'
INV. IN: 722.41'
INV. OUT: 722.23'I / I
1 I z I
1 —
( )
I /
\ , % V) I j
( 'i' ��' e 1 ( / ,_
\ // \ / �° / / ,/ / ( /'/ ,- PARCEL 407 001 \ \\ J I _\ , \\\\-___--4Fr— --- -\ ` \ -\ --I \ \ , \ \ — — — _+ I
Zone X / / / - ^1 \\ ♦ / \ 1 \ --- — \ \- `-\�``\_-- \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I/` \ /
�1j1 \C I / ,/ / / _------_MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. ( ..�\---- _ — ) e \ - `�l �\ _ \ \ // �� i I'
\\ / See Note 6� / / - --'- \ \ \ \ � I /-; - - , �71 / \ I Ilr -1se
�/ / , ' '' DEED BOOK 1216 PAGE 876 - - `� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ — i r \ 7 / // /
I.
-' \\ -_- - \ , / ,� _�� _ -) - `1 ---'\\ - __ — \ ('— \ \ /'/ ! / ,' / -� j \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ MARK FUNDERBURK - - \ �� \ ) I \ -_ I 1 (� %1\ /'/ 7 ��\ x
`' / \ ` _ n - i i r \ \ \ \ PARCEL 4 .7 00801 1 / r I // // 14 ( / 1 I 1�`
\ (� -, / -�. — - - / ,' �' ,�' './ ��� -,---' \ \ \ \\ \\ ♦ DEED BOOK 1225 `_ - \ -- --`-- _ _ ill /� (I/ I \1 ( I \ ,- Cz
\ `
_� 1 / \\ \ I \ �� / /-1 II / / / / /' ,' _ --_- y'` -�`��� �_ — / \ I / / =� / / _i 1 \ \ \\ ` \ PAGE 74 - \- \ \\�� \L � �` \\ �_ "'//I t _'---1\/// \ h I �\\� l 1 I 111 d
-\ ,' �i' \ `/ \ / I /� II / / / I ,�` --- �\ Trf\ I I 1 / r / // ,-' I - T'`� �i — \ t\ter - ` \`--- _•-- ✓ ' --_- I ° ILI
I I I ---4 _ - _ / L, I _ � - - ` —4 _ / __� _ \vim
\ 1 I I / / / / /' / - - - - - _ - - _ _ - _ \ - - - - _ ,` - - -' \ \ \ I I I / / / / / _ - - � \ \ \ \ 1\ \ \ \ \ \ �� -�—`i■s.��i \ _moo iC �� i - �i�� ,` \ '73
PARCEL 407800902 �/ - \ I / / / ,1' ,' -- -\ \_ `\� 1, / / le / ---' - - ---__/ \ \ \ '\ - -- �' \ \ \ \ ( \� � °
/ice / �' i \ rn / \ / / I / /\ 0 I / / , , �68— — _-_ 1 __ \ -- \ \ I I / ,�' , \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ - '\__ � -`- \\ \ `- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ /_ \ X v Ul
BETTYESNTHOMASON I \ 1 I / / // / ' ^ _------- ` — \-- \ --- -- - _ \� I I / /' - _ J \ \ \ -\ -\\ J _-- \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ - \ \ l - - \ \ D d Ln10
DEED BOOK 600-JI l 1 II I // / ' / / // / /,_� - - \- — - \ - \__ I 1 I I I I 1 / / _ ...� \ / , \ \ \ \ _ \ \ I\ I 1 \ \ \ \\ \\ -\ \ \ -\ \ \ II `tm
\ / / ) fs / / _ \ -\-\ \ - - �I 1 ' \ ! ) / /' / ,, / ►— , ) \ \\ ,\ \ \\ \ \ I-, \ \ \\ \\ \ - -\ I 1I Ob
PAGE 129 / / / �' - _ - -- - \ _\ \ ) 1 1 \ �_ �_- - _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � p G1
\ /-------- // , \\ \ \-, \ -\___\ \ \\ \ -\\ \ \1 - -\ 0 1
3s / / / / / / / / � --- '-_ - ----- - - �4 -\ -- !t I ) 1 \\ I 1 1 / I I I I / / // / \ -\ ` -1 1 \ \ \ \ \ I � .o y
/ \ \ / p `; / _/l /I I l / / `/ I // / / ,-------- _ \ - \ -_`_ \ \ \ / / / / I I ' �- \ \_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ ` / \ c° fi G
,I\ \ \ \ \ \ \All1 \ t�
r l / / j / - - \` - \\ I/ l / \ \ \ \ -
\ / / — - \ J I / / \ \ \ /
/ / / , �75C� — — - \ \ I \
/ f% I 1 / I / I J / / / l / / / / , ' '-_-- 1 - - _ \ , \ I \ \ \ It \ \ \ \ ^I _ __/ S / \ \ \ \ - � \ \ \ I`
1 / / / / / / --__ --� _\\\ \ \ \'\ \ -\ I \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ / \ \ 1 \ - \ \- - - \ -_J//I / 1 --( 1 Zone & / // / / / / / / , , f /I' / /� -_--- - - \\ \ \ \- \1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \- \ / /, / / . -\- - \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ -\ \ - \ 1 I\� �,
/ / / / / / / ' - \ - \ III \ \ \ \ � � \ L ' J ; , j ��\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
)1 II / BFE/ I�'' c /' / / ' / / %��' _ — \\ - - \ - \-\ -`\\ \\ -\ \ I l- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / ^, ,/ ' / \ \_ \` \ \ \ \ \ \_\ \\\ — — _\ 7 I -, l �]
/ a 11 1\ / \ _ /I / / /' ////� / / /'/' __ __ �` _ `-- - `-`\ - -� ` `-\ \\ \ \ ^.,�_ \ \ \ - \ N. \ \ \ \ - -` \ \ l /' / / / \�---_ -_ \ \_ \ \` \_\ \ \ - \ --\` _ N. \ \ I _W
\ \\ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
� i' , 1 \II II , / //, / / / / / ,^//r , //- /f ...► -_--- \- ---`\� \\� \\ ` \ \\ \ - \ \ _ \ \ - `. \ I 1 / ,' ,' / I — - \__ -\-- \ \ `_ - %\ \-- -`\ \_ - A
1
/ / / / \ -\\ \—_- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ pp 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ - \
/ 11 / f __ / / r / �5 / / / / / // / / / \l / / / / / /// / / / �� — — - ® \ \\ \ \\ \ -� --� \\�-- \) I \ \ \ \ \ \ `\ -1 N. 1 1 I l I ( , — _ - \ \ ` \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \
I /\\ \ / \7 /, '- / // / / / I // \�I/ / / // / / / r / , -� - \-\ ` \ \-\� \ -� - - \\`�\�\\\ -f° `_ \ \ \ I j \ I --_ _,-----_- % ` / /- \ \ \ \ `\ \- \ -\ \\ -\\\ \
\ - \\\ ) / / , / / / / / �, / / / / \II / / / / / / / / ----__ --- _ \\� `\\- \ \ \� -�-' - \\�� \ 1 / / / / y \ ---- ' %' ''' ' '' s \ \ \ \ - \ \ �.
/ \ Ill / \ / / / / / / / I / / / / / I - \ \ � \ \ � , \ \\`\ .\\\ - \- I \ / / / / \ / I \ I \ --� _ /i' , /,/ _ \ \ \ \\ -�\\ I I J \ \ \\ / / \ / \ \ \
i / '/ _ _ ------__ \ \ \ \ its \\ \\ - 1 I I 1 1 / \ 1 l \ 1_�' --------_ �Y69� - / / / / ,'/ / / _ \ \ \ _ 1
� PARCEL 40AGNEIII / \-_' // ' I I'// ' / /' -\I/ / ' / / ' ' �_ - \\ \\ \ - \ \ \\ / \ -- --- i /// ' /' ,' , / I \ \11 ,
n1O \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1 I
AUDREY L. AGNER 11 / / / / / / / / — _ \\ \ \ \ \ \`\` ` \ \\ 1 - , I \ _ -- _ _ ' �i' /�/ /' / � ' / i ( / \1 m
/ DEED BOOK 600 �r�//' 111 ,I l / / / / / /' '/// ' / /' / / / / ' / / ^ l / / / / / // / / ' _� -- -`\ -\ ` \ \\ \\ \- \ \ 111 1\ \- , \ 1 \ 1 \ l ' I - �'/�------------- - --' //i // / ' ' ' — �- / --/ ' / / \ r
/ 1 / /' — �5 \ \ \ , \ /
PAGE 130 r �/ ///I /%/ /'� - ,'� / / /// / /// / I/ I l/'j //// /' /' / / / / / // / — -\ \ \\\ \ \\\ \\`\`� \- \ \\ I111 \ _ 1 l \ \ \ \\ I\ 1 -- \^/�',,_ _-- 't :' /rr / / / / / / / / / , / /
,/ /%/ /// I '/,/ / �/ / / / / / �/\ / / / / / / ,, / / / ___ � \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ I1111 \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \I-------
___- �' __ i l --- /\_ I
/' // I / / 4 ,, / / / / / / / / } / / / / / / , / �� — - - ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -\ \ \\\\\ II II \ \ \\ \ \ �\ \- \ \- / /i _ / ',_ _I I I I ) ,'/ /1 � I, / ' \
j/ //� jl I I I ) /'_'e1,,nb e 6 fqr— /' ,'// / // / I / / / / / / /' ,' /' '-- - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \- \ \\ \ 111 1 \ \ '\ ` - - - \ \- / ' / _-- / \ \ I I 1 / ! / / ,��'�' '' /� , 1 I `` \
/ / _ \ \ III j 1 50L�y3 �P �0.00�9 ACC - _ -'/ % (/ I I I /
// FAodway/_16od / / / / / / / I / / / / \ \mil\ \ \ - \ \ R _ - -_ ti - /��_% r /' /' _ _ ' I /'/
1/ / d� / / / 6 / \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ I I III - I ( f�u1P\C?RA Y TREAD IMO�� - -- \ _ I \
I I / I I / I / ine InTormatioy' Ap/
l l x I / I / / / - \ \ - \- \ - _ - - �i/' "1 \\\ \ \ / / / / / / / /,----
_-' / ' / / /
I/ `- / / / / l l 1 I \ / // / // , ' ,�/� ,/ / - \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ I / - "- \--� \ \�-\- / / - ---_- \ / l I l l I / / / r' / I ,
I1 I ; J / / I / / _� I / l I l l / / J J l /' / ' / ' // r . \ �\ \ \\\\ \\ ` \ \\ \\\ I I , \ — \ - I ` -1 \ \\-� - ` / t / /l / / _\ \\\ \ \ / / // / / / / -- /-1 / 1 1 /
^\ - \�---- \\ \ \ \ - - // \\\ \ \\\ \ \ \ ` / / I I /� /^ I lI1 �- ! I I I l / � /— / I I I I I \ \ \ �t I /\ I \ 1 \ \ \ I I \ / � \ / - � 1
i//� IfI� \ 1 � (� I I ) I 1 I ' / ' / ' / � 1 I I I I 1 I\ ' ( � � / // / \ / ' / I \ l \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ I I II \1 %� \ --/ / \ -� - �/ l "// / i -\ \ - \ \ \ / I / / // // / / '
\ III _ I / / / ^ ,/ ' 1 \ I1 _ \ \\ - - `_ / 1( I / \\ \ ` \ I J /1 / / / / i i / /' / r 1
1\ \\\ //(I I Il I I I / I / /' / / 1 1 \ \ /' - �' / - \ \ \ \ \\ \ '11 11 \ \ /�%-\� / \ _ 1 I i /`_` \ \) .� /' '/ I I I I I I 1 \\�\`\ \ \ \\\ / J / ' /' - / /' /' / I \ w r 1
\ l \ / / ,
\ - \\ \ / , / / / / /
CD
/ / / v 7 I ( / 1 1 1 l \ \ (I 11 / '' / 1 II I ` \ _ \ l „/766- \ --- / I I 1 \ - \ / / / I I
Q 1 \ \ \ I
1 1 I \ ( / I I \ I \ \ \ \ � I \ \ - \ ✓ \ \ \ I 1 I / / / \\ / /',- ^�-�-_ ---- \ \-- \ 1 7 1 ' /
\\ / 1 \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \- \ l I \ R--�� --- ��- -- l I '/ / ' _-` �. o '/__---_J \ I 1 ` \- I I / / /
/ / \ \ \ I _/ — \ ` \ \ I I / / , _ •--'�Y , / / ( / - - � � � i / _ ` \\ 11 \ - \ \ \ I I J 7 -
Zone Regulato - \ \ I I e / - ` \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \_ \ ' I / 1 Ii I // _\--\_�\^-- �_ !--- - ---___ _ -\- \\\ I 1 / / \ _ ` -
III \ 1 I _ \ \ \ - -_ \\ I \ \ \ ('"\ / - / I \ ) / / - - \ /� -'i - -'J /' - \ \��\ \\ 1 1 / ---`, \_ \-_ \
Floodway I \� 1 1 � , - \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\° T- / I ,i /` \ ///� / ' - \\\ - _ \ \ \ \\ NI 1 / /''/ - / ` \ I1 \ l I / / - \ / I \
a �1 / J ) \ \ \ \ _ 1 / - \ �s - , F�EA�I �- SJ E E - \ \ \ - - \ ` — -- — \ — - \ - - - - \` \ ,
/ \ - m \ l 1 r / , / / ^\ 1 \\ \ \ \ �\ \ ` \ / ' \ \ \ /1r 1 I I // / ' , - \ \- � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I i / // .... \\ \ \\ 1 \1 / ( 1 1 \%\-
\ I \ \ / - \ \ \ \ - I - \ - --
--\_ l 1 I / - \ \ \_ \ f '1_ I / \ \\ \\\ / \ \\ \ �r 11 \ - \
/ `II Il \ ( \ \ 1 r / /' / -' ^1 \ \ 1 \ 1\ \_ ----_ i` \ \1 1\ I \' /' / / \ \ ` --\ \ \\ \ I I / / / �''-\ -\ ' - / - \\ \ -I III \\ - -\ ---- - - \ \
\ I / / - 1q \ \ I \ ` 1 y I
/ -\ \ \ _ - \ ' / ) 1 // r 1\ - \ _ \\\�\\\\ \\ I I // / / \ 1 --- '\ \- \ III t \ \ \ . __-_ f` \_ J /
"� )/' / / I / \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 I I / I / _ / \ \ \ \_ - _ /_ �\ / I l ,, / / / / / \__ --_- - \ \ \\ \\\\ \ 1 ' I I I 1 ! -- \ / f- \ \ \ \ -\ \ - \ ---- --' / I I
,, \ / I I \ I \ 1 ( / / / ' _ I - _ � \ C `\` \ _ \ -\ - _ ) / \ /') \ \ y I / / ,/ ^a7� -\`-_- - `\ \ \\ \ \\\� I I I I 1 I I I I ( ( / / � \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ I 111L-\ \ \ \ \ \ ------ \ \ ,I
' -\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ r
/ / I / / \ \ \\ - \ ` \ -- -\ \\\\ \ \\ \ \ ` \\ i i I i I I I -\ \ - /l \ \ \\ I I I \ \\ \ \ -\\ \ - ---� _- \ \ / I
/ / \ Bur// I \ q \ \ \ I 1 \ \ - \ / / \ �pI
Ir \ I \ 1 I I I 1 /' J \ 1 / / ' / // - ti \ \I \ -\ \ \ r-- / f 11 /\ \ 1 \ `\ \ \1&\ \' \\ \ I 1 / o \ \ \ \ - -_ V - / \ 1 7'
I ` \\ I \- _ , \ \ \ -
\ ` �) ` I / �// /' /1 \ ' / / j / , — '� 1l l\ \ \ \ \ \ /I I I / /\�\\ /' -\ -\ \ \ \\\ \\ \�\ 1 I ' I I \ — \ \ \ __ _ \ -' - ' i / J /' /
I I / J \ IINA / ✓ \ 1 I \ \ \ \ - \ -- / / / ) , I I I 80
1 I I / C '-- \ /- \ \ \\ \ \ / /
/' I I I I ` \ \ \ \\ 1 I I I I \ \ / / / / , I
y I , \ / \ \ \\\\%a I _
,, , I \ , r , \ I I 1 1 / ,rp , _�11 ' J , I 1 I I I 1 I , ��, , / 7^-- \, S L _ 1 \ \ \\\. I q� \ � \ �. -I / r , , \ , r / 1 I
I \ / \ , \ 0' \ \\\ 1 - -- I / / / \
/ s \ / '
\ I \\ I I I I I 1\\ 1 1 I I I I \ 1\ ,/ � , I I I I / �-\ -\ \\ \\\ \\\\ I 1 1 � r r � / / /III
�\ I I \ \I \ \ I / l \ � -\ \\\ \ \ \ \\ _------- '-' / I r I / / / ,' / / `
1 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 l � I ' \ / I,r \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 11
\ \ \ \ I l \ \ \ / / ,7. , \ \ \ \ f l- �_ ) \ \ ' \ -- \' _ / / / / ' / / / / i J I 1 \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 11\\\\ / / 1 I \ \ \ \ ', \ \ \ — — / , , / A� --
/ / _ 1 \ \ \\\ \\ \ \ , \ / /
� ,/-,, I '_��\ - r _ �/ , \ — - \ \ \ \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , /" / \ - / -' / , /�, / / , to \\
/ L- \ \ \ — / ' / /
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ �\ \ \ /'- \ \ \ \ \ \ l
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \ _ - - / 1 \ -\ \ \ \ C.. / I \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ 1 \ ' / / /
\ \ \ \ \_ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ /�/i`\_ / J \
\I /1 \ \ \ \ \�\\ \\ \\\ /^Ill \ \ _�- \ / \ -- / J \ / r^ /- \ \ \ \ \\\ \ / ' /
/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � \ \% \\_\ \ \ \_— — \\ ,, , \\ \ ( ,1 V \ _ _ ' \/-�\ _ _ ,' \ / l \ \\ \\ \ \\\ \\\ \ s 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \C \ ' ' ' / I / I l I
/ , / /
SSMH / \ \ \ _ -1-1 \ i \ - - \ \ \ \ \ \ - _ - \ \ / \ 1 1 / _ _ \ \((\ \ - _ \ \ ' - / J'' / / /
RIM:735.83' \ - -\ _ i , 1 \ \ \\ \\ - --\ \ \ \ \ __ - _ - _ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\ `r\\ _- \ I \ \ \- \ _ ''\_� / / / / / 1
INV. IN:724.99' ' / -\ \\ / \ \� - \ �.. \ \ \ \\ \ � \ \ `- - , .. - \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ �� / / ,� - \ \ \ \ '' / / I
f / / -\ \ \ I , \ \ \ ` \ \ `_ \ - \ \ \ \-\ \-\ \ sue --^ - - _ \ / / 1 \ / / / l \\\ \ �1\\ \ \ �(\ ( \ \ -\ \ \- \ Li / /
INV. OUT:724.75' / / 11 / �( -\ \ ) 1, \ \\\ � \ \ \- -\ `-_ '1 \ \ \ \ \-\\\-_- - \ -N.- — \ _ \ * / -' - _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1\_ `\ J \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ _�- ` - , I I /0 /
I I-
_ \ \\ \ \\1 \ - - _ ( \ �_ \ \ 1 \ J
� - 1 Zone \A'\ \-- \ \ \ \ \ � - � \1 ��\, \ 9-2 �I q \ � ! \ / ( J
See Note \ \
/ 7%- - r \ - \ \ \\ - - - - `\- ;%; I L\ _ _ _ \ l\ / // t \ \ - _ - � \` \ - N I,\ (�` J(V��� A N� I �VI C T / / / r
/ / / , , \� \'\ — \ � - \` \ �Il\f- _ — _ \ \ \ \ \� \ / / \\\ -\ `� \ \ \ \ \ � \ _ 1 I \ / I / / / /
ORSBORN
ENGINEERING GROUP
605 LEXINGTON AVENUE, SUITE 301
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
P) 704-749-1432
www.orsborn-eng.com
/
/
/
/
a
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ Off' /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ OF' /
/ Off' /
/ /
— / /
/ /
/ Off' /
/
/
Q� /
/
/
/
/
/
I X
' / ,' /- �- --- - -/ \ \\ l \_ --`-) --� _ - �`N, _^ I - \ \ �_ \ \ \ \ \ / / \ L') / / � - � _\� - \- � ` '� \ 1 -_--- \ \- \ \ I / / / 1
/ /' I /' // `. r ^ :� - \O\ \ \ \ l ` \ 11 \ — \\.\ \\ -Z ) % \ \ \ \ \ ✓ \ \ ' \ ' �` - -\ \��- \ _� -- lam_'\III I 1-\ \\- - \ 1 I '' I / I, —_ r
f /[/ / ' _:_�_-- --`� 1�1 \ / 1\ _ \� I -\ _ l ( ', l \ \ \\ \ \ -\- \ \ ) ( / -_ `-_ _\ - ��' '^III ,\ - -\ / /
/ / / _----------- . �y. \\ \ \ , \\\ \\ \\, I\ \\ -\ _ \ \ \ \ \ I / /I I , / I I /' /
' /' / / /' '84 _ �Q-�iC�-� _ _ C_- '/ / / \��__%_ \.\ `� - \ \ \ \ y\ I /� \ \ I /--' - -\ \ - \ \- \ 1 I f / / ( l ) /J//- // / ' `I I
/ /' / / , E'G1P01�Ap�/ __ AM IM� ` \\__ — -- ♦ /\ / /// \ \ 1 \ \`-� 1 \ \ ` \ k ?N \� 1 \ �-�_-
--.-- \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ I / ^ / / / / '
/ I / / '' ��JT�-1 LESS_ U LVER -------- -� I,'- .'� \ \\�``�/\ I cC ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ /� --- A\ ` \\ \- \\ I 1 III / ( 1 / / p- / / , J
J / ' /' --- - \- \'j^/4f� i _✓ \\\\\\ \\ \ \ \ � \ \ \\ // / I \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ I 1 I I -/ I \ / , /
/� Ipy / / �'-' , / / ^ \\ \\ ... _ / PVC \ "/' \ \ \ \ _� \ \ \ \ \ \ ` /,'/ / 1 \ I ;��
\ _\\ \ // \ \ 111\ ' \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \\ \ / I / /
\ \ \ \ -- \ \ --� -\ I / / / / / \/
// / / / ' ' ) , — \ ,--- \ - (approximate, � \ \ \ \ \ \ - \ \ I _ \ I I 1 1 t // --- ,
/ / / / /' -- / / `---- .-.. �- — —---__-_ \\ end not found) �\ \\ \ \ \ \ / / L / / / �c-' \ \ - \ \ III / �- _' I \ \ . / I / \
PARCEL 407 Ili / / / / , / ./ \ \-;_ \/' \ / <) I \ \ \ \ - \` t I \ 1 I \ -\ 1 } \ \ \ \ \- \ \-� \\\ I \ , /\
EDDIE D. & / I , / -' / / �_-' \ \ —ems-- �\\ �. I \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \ _ / \ \ -- \\ \\\\ �,I) I / I / �-__ -\ \ �/ / / I V I / /—
DEBRA B. ELLER /' ,/ // /�// / ' -''/ '� _-'--'-__-- _ \\� \\\\\�`�t(D� ` \,\ \\\\ \\\\\ i.\\\ \ \ l 1 \ } /� / 1 - \- -_ , \ \�♦- I / / / ? l \ - / i
DEED BOOK 758 , , , / / - - - _ ' \ - \ \ \
\`�-��-- \ MhA�M� \ J 1 /
PAGE 175 -J /'''/' '',/ / ,/ / , / / '' ,-_ _` \-_ -- -__ —\ ' � 2\ ���\-D11 \�`\ \ � �,- \ / - \\ / l 7 /J 1 /' I � \ \ \ \ - - \ \\ \IfI 1111 I II I / \ / r \ \ -_ \ I \ I I / I/
/ / , , I ' / / \` _ ---- \ \ \ \\ \ r\�\\ \ \ \ - 1 \ , / ,\ / / / \ 1 \ \ \ IX \ \ \ \11 / / - ,/ - I I / A `I
/ /I / / / / / - .,�`` \ 1_ �WIL ` \ \` �N. f - I.\ \ ` ` \ tr �,/�o 1 1 / / _ ' / / I / 1 I //
/ / I' /' '' ^\ `-- — --- -- _-_ �, \ \ _ \ -� \ \`\' \\ \ \\\ \ \ \ 1 I 1 I I ' \ I \ I Y'r I I ' ' _ Q ' ' ' / , / i / / /
/ / / / \ J � � \ \ \ \ \ ( / , I \ \ \ - /r / / - /
/ �' / / /i, / I / \ __ - -- - _ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ J \ \ \ \`-\1 / / I �/ CS -- --, -' / / I 1
__ / �, /( I , , / / B YY 1 `_'�__' - - , - _ _ \ \\ \ \�\ \ C / / � \ L'\ \1 I ' - / - / / II I r
' , /\ b , - _ — ` — \ \ ,`- T\EC�P �fC T ` \R� �IPA� J I I 1 \ 1 \ -\ \ \\\ / //J ' , / _/ I 1 I ` \
1 � \
/ �\�-�,11 rrpp / // LL
I \/ ,/ / /' / i — — \ \ — \\ \ _ \ \ \rC�tO\ \ ', \\`\\ , \ \ \\ X\ ! \ X/ \ r -` , \-\ \ ���,� 11 /mil\ ! --- - - /' ' / ' ' I I /
/ / I /, ,' /, I I / I _ _ / / — _ `\\ \� \ — —\ \ � __ \ \ \ \� \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1 X 1 \ \ l M 1 \ - 1 \ -\ \ I l ' ( / / ^ .� / ,� , - , , / /
/ / \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _/ I / / I /
/ — — ` \ \ ` �� _ � \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \) 1 )1 \ -\ \ \\ \1 _ I I' i / _�' ' -' _ _r I / 11 it / / if
// / , / - — — — \ \ /\ \\ /. - - \ \ \ \ \ \
/ / / _ I / l I — \\ \ \ - \ - \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 l - \ \ / 111 l I / — / /
/14 / // 11 I` - - / 1 I — _ \-` \',�r=^\ ,�'��-_ _ _\- \_ \`-\\- -_`\ \ , \_ \ \^ _ \ �\ _ \\ ` \\�\\�\\ \\\`__-\ \ \__\ - \ -\ \ \ -- \\ \ \ 11 ; I I / / '/ - /\ ) 1 III \ \
-1 k
// - / / / \\ r-__ (\� - 11/-�\\\ \�- =\ =- \ -�R'ER \ \- \ \\ \\\]\T�- i T\\ ,-\\-- -1 \ \\ Tower\ \ I I / I / 11 �'- I
-7
/ I _ / / \- \- -� \ \ -- - \ \ _\ - \ _ \
\ \
k >1
\ -
I � I(,
l - _ V
/ ' /- / ` / / -- \ —\\\� \\ / —_- Ill, \\\ 11 �-✓— \ -- �`�- - \ \ \\\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ ` \ / \ \ (J� l '� \ I I / l —\ ' All
I /
/ , I \ / -,--- // � I I / - _ _-)IIli))//! JJ ///` 1111 k-/i\1` �\ LpCM I--STR AM �\\ \,, \ \ \ \--\`\\\\\` _ \\—\ - \\ \ \ \ C ' I 1 ' / 1 I
I // \/I I /' T _ J / l I l / ' / - _III'/'� 'I I/%r-1\IIL/ ✓`` .pq \`���� \ `t C \\1\_ f,r' t- \\ \\`� \\ �`\\\-\\�� \ -\` \ \\\ \\\ ��� \\ �\ \ / / 1 \\ / / / �7 / l I \
\ \ \\ \ - -\ \ , \ / \ \ I /
/ / r I l i -- � � ( / / _ , , l l �i'— — I / I fJ/ -�' — ''N \ \ `,I� ^\\-- \ -/ \ \--\ \� — ` -� --- \ \\\ \\ \� \ \ 1 ` I '' i I ( 11
/,, ,' - / / 1� / TF��IL�EF�'�P \_ '_�;- \\ I �_ -- \_ - \\ \\ \ , 1 / / \ \
o \\� \ \ \ \ \ \ \_-_ :-\ \\ \� \ \ \ \
�000
�/ , ". I , / ,' / / / \ / / l l / / ,' --- �' \ ,\ \—' \ \ \ 1 \ 1 ) I J 1 \ \ — —\__ -� �\\\ � `� \ —/ \\`\\`�\\\� \_ \, \ \\ � I • - — I \ ` \ \� l
, / \ ` ) / r' I — —-------- \\ - `-- _ — r \\ \ \ \ ��\ \ - \\ -\ - i A�PROXIMAT �OC�jlTlbll CIF \ - \ \ ♦ �
/ / / / / \ - — ,/ , / e _ \_-_ `IIL-\ // --- �\ \\ ` - \ - I �\ \\ �� - \ t TRANSMISSIbI� /EA�EME�JT� I I
_ \`-�-__. - \ \ I \ _
/ ' / i � — / / .� (' \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \\ \ \\ '� \ \ ` ; , 1 / (NrpT ,�.i'RV �/ / / ' t � i \ I \ \ \\ \ I 1 i L I 1
.i , /,' / , — / / / , - / 1 \ I%1J/ \(r \ \-\\ \ \ `_� ��__ - I \\\ '\ \ \ \ / \— _, \ I \ \ \ ' \ \ - 1 ' J . / ( 1 ` \ 1 \
/- �/ / oe , -'',� — \' - , �' ' ' / / (/ / - - J I \1 / It// :�\\ /-\\-\\\ -� \ \\ \� -_- -- _ \ 1, / \\\\ \ \� \ \ \\ \ 1i4 /1 / -\ ^� ( l l \�"� �.�� \ \., II i 11 i I J I l
/ PARCEL 407 012 -'�''/ �' /' ,' / `►775 / ' / ' ' /, _ ' ' 1 -\ I\ l 1 SIC/'.o_ \��_^\ \\ �.—---\-\\ \ \\y \_ \ -�\\\ \ \ \ \ \ ,` \ \ \ -\ , / / \ ( \ \ I-- L_ `- I \ \
EDDIE D. & ,. 'e r / 11 , / 1 / I / / \ \ _ - \ \ \ \-'�C �\ / \ t`\ \ /` \\ \ \ \ \ \ / / - -\ \ - ^ - — `_'\ <' / J 1 I I
DEBRA B. ELLER / , / / i — / / / // _-- ,'/ / / �' 1 -- \\_`- --- -- - \ \ ` - \ / \ \ \ \ \ -- ' _ \ \ \ \ C' / —i - L
\ - _ Q \ \ \ \ \ \ -_ I _ _ _ \ `\ /
DEED BOOK 758 - / \ \ % \ \ \ \ I — /� i \ \
PAGE 175 /' i - ,�, �/' , ,-,-- ��- / I I / / /-\—l---\ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ , en \ \ _ \/ \ /, \
/ / \ - �� �r���— � �/ / / / \ ) _ - - —* \\ \\\\\\\ . \__I /� \ \ \ \ / \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \\ ----- / ` \ I — „I \ } / /
/ r ( _ \ ,--- - _ - _ \\\ _--\ \ \ \ mob\ \ - \—_—_ I I I / I
I / �/ / / / / / \ //1 1 ( ` , -- °I� L��/� L \ \ \\\ \ \\ \ -b� J _� l \ \ - \ \ \ \\\ \\ - - ---__ _--- -`\ \ 1 \ \ -- --\___ \ \- 1 , \ J
1 \ \ \ \ \ / \ ; , /� I
\J / / / / — _ - / _ 1 '-- - _ - \ 1 \ Icy \` \ \\ _ _ — � \ \ `- - \ \ \\ -=------------- \ \ -_ �\ _ \ I �� 1
/ / / �� / / / C, ,, / ''�\_ \ (( I I \ ` \ \ \ \-\ \\\\ it ~ \ \ -\ �\ ) \ \\ \ ` -\-\---` \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \- -_/'1 — `, \ \\ \ -\ '\ I 1 I / I
/ �// / 9`. \ / / / / ' '�-' '' ---- 'I l I \ I \ )- ____ --- - \ �\\\\ `\- /L�' _ — \ \ \ \ \ _ 1 \ \ - ----_a — \ \\ \ \\ -`_ _ _ \ 1 I / I I
1 i \ ' /' 1 1 \ `\ \ , I \_�\ \\ \--\ _ \ — Tt�- �\ yam_ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ -\ 1 \ 1 1 ,
/ / \ / I 1 I / `" _ ' , - - -I1\ \ - - B6 \ ) ) 1 1 I \%\\ \`-\ - ` ---, --\� \-� - -�_— \ \ 1\ \ \ _ \_� \ \\ 1 \ 1 / 1 1 \
/� 11/ / / / / ''- /' — _ _ , ( \ \ \ \ -- - ^\-\-`- _ \ \ \ / / 11, \�-- - \ — \--\\\`\\`\\\\ I \\ - _ --- - �fi4 / \\ \_ \` I I // /
\\ \ \ - \\ \ \ -'\ \ 1\I \ \ ' - \ � - _` \ 1 I I I \` I \ / , I I I I
/ / I PARCEL 407 019 / \ - \ -\ s `/ vC \ \ \ \\ ' . �\ \ N_ --I-,- - _ \ 1 ` — — / \\\ \\ \ _ /< \,\ \ \` -' \ PARCEL 407 02101 I II N \ / j I /' / j '/ // I I / / /-
/ I LLOYD E. & 0 / / --__, \�\\�\ \ 11 , \ , (,,'_ WILLIAM P. & II II / / _' I /' // / / / / �� / / // /
/ / SUSANA M. WILDER / \_ `\� \ `--� \ 1 I r'-\ 1 r ' ELIZABETH G. KESLER I I I) / / / / ` I 01 / /(
/ ) \ \--\ \ \ \-\\ \-J II, 1 T/ \ DEED BOOK 1295 I I / Il I /_ / J �\\ (( / l l / / / / � / //
/ I DEED BOOK 1024 Tower 1 \\\ ` ` \ 0�� ` \---- _%'/ J PAGE 580 r \ / / I I / ///
PAGE 316 / \\\\\ \ \ \ \ C-r'f ' \ \ \ \ \ 1 ` 1 / \ / / , \ / /
// _\\\� -_--'--�\1\ 1 I /' / - /- \ \-\\ \\ /// ( I/ / / \ I i ( // / / //
PARCEL 407 017 \ \ - _ \ I I r \ I 1 \ ��g I _ ' / ) /
\ I MARK PATTON PARCEL 407 018 / -\y� \ \ 1__ / I \1 \\\l I I1 I �`� ��\\\ / _\\�I\li� `\ 1 1 I 1 \ I I / l / � / / l� //
DEED BOOK 1219 CHARLES F. WILHELM / \ \ \ — `�-'-, \
PARCEL 407 075 / I PAGE 783 DEED BOOK 635 / / - - I �i75� _ _ I _ I / � / ' /
\ \ \ '1` 1 \ \ \ / / / /
PAGE 215 -\\ \ \t\ \ 1 I / % � r \ I 1 I ) / / * / / /
NANCY BOSTAIN SHUE ' pp
\ DE D BOO OS 38 / PTIMOTHY BOYARCEL 407 OD6 I I I I — —
."j\ 111 f / / %/ / 4
LOCKHART \ II I I I I / r^\ / , _� , / I \ I / // /
DEED BOOK 1336 '. \ � / -/,/ /' ),' / / , ) / ///I/ / I // G�
PAGE 150
O -_\ 1 I I I I ll I / I Iif I I/^,//' r6 /' I'/ /J //i'i/ // /�/
\ / 04i PARCEL 407 021 -- / 11,1
I / JESSE L. WATSON, JR. � \\\ I // 11
I /I � / //-1 1 �� — -, ) \ I 11 / ' �/ / / 40`10 \� \,Zpl
,/
DEED BOOK 1170 \ \ I I ( 1 � I / -' Q� \ j I� /�' / / / // %/ / CS 4 0
PAGE 540 \ / /i / /
\ I / / / \\ �\ r/ I II 11� \I — �� I I ^I / /f /) / ;,'/ 1 / / '/ / // 5- . �q,\
y . / � , 4
A" ` / `_\\\ 1i /l I `\J\ II �/ I ( / - __1 -�� / 2R �/ O
-0 - ` \ f / I I \ ) I I I ! I I / /' /' -s%/'/ �i / � / 4�v
off, / ova / I I (// /l/� //
4,�� -'-, / / ,
h'O�� / l / j�D// Jl / �///r;'// / �j// / /
� � o 1$1 I/ / / / 1= // / / � /4 / � /I / / � , ,- I /'� /
O� L_Jr/ S�90 '\ —_1 ''� /
/ _ I //// // / / / ', / // // - - - , - _� I
NIN� / __ __��_ - .
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
FOR
HENDERSON GROVE INDUSTRIAL
SALISBU RY, ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLI NA
MAY 101 2022
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY ORSBORN ENGINEERING GROUP, PA SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO ORSBORN ENGINEERING GROUP, PA.
OE ce____0
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200 400
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
Industrial Development
Henderson Grove Church Road
Salisbury, North Carolina
H&H Job No.TCD-003
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed development is located west of Henderson Grove Church Road and northeast of
Peach Orchard Road in Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina. The Site consists of three tax
parcels (Rowan County Parcel ID Numbers 5658-01-16-5137, 5658-01-15-9477, and 5658-01-15-
1249) that total approximately 95.7 acres.
H&H reviewed State and Federal Threatened and Endangered Species databases for the Site and
conducted a screening survey of the Site and surrounding area in May 2022 for Federal Threatened
and Endangered Species, and none were identified. H&H also reviewed the National Registry of
Historic Places (NRHP) for Sites located in Rowan County, North Carolina; the North Carolina
State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) GIS viewer; and the Site and surrounding area via
visual reconnaissance for the potential presence of historic, cultural, and/or archeological sites.
The NC SHPO GIS viewer depicts Beaver Farm (RW0670) as a "surveyed only" structure on the
adjacent property to the south of the Site. No recorded sites or significant structures were observed
on -Site. H&H requested comment on the Site from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS), NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC), and NC SHPO in March 2021. Agency
responses are included in Appendix D and do not indicate the presence of historic sites or protected
species.
In order to prevent dewatering of the remaining portion of Stream Channel "C" and other Waters
of the U.S. located downgradient of the Site, the developer is proposing the installation of a filtered
trench drain north of the proposed Building 2. The filtered trench drain system will extend to the
unimpacted portion of Stream Channel "C" to maintain flow through the Site.
A previously designed Concept Site Plan prepared by Orsborn Engineering dated May 10, 2022
indicates that the developer originally proposed a significantly larger area of disturbance, which
1
https://hart]tick.shuepoint.com/sites/MmtfFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Id
Road/Permitting/09_C Avoid RodMinimize.docx hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

included additional parking areas and BMPs. The proposed Site building has been reduced from
the desired single 550,000 square foot building to one 310,000 square foot building and one
182,000 square foot building, to facilitate a reduction of impacts to on -Site aquatic resources. In
addition, infrastructure has been shifted and retaining walls have been proposed to further avoid
grading in Waters of the U.S. In addition, multi -tenant warehouse/distribution buildings have
certain industry standard requirements for buildings that consist of specific building and parking
dimensions. The current Site Plan and prior Concept Site Plan are included in Appendix B.
To minimize Site impacts, the proposed Site plan was designed to avoid Waters of the US to the
maximum extent practicable. The Site building, parking areas, loading docks, and stormwater
management area have been designed to primarily occupy upland areas. As mentioned above, the
original Site plan proposed a single larger warehouse building. Because the Site layout has been
redesigned to include two smaller warehouse buildings, the proposed development will avoid
impacting Stream Channel "B", Stream Channel "A", Wetland Area "A", and Pond "A". In
addition, impacts to perennial streams have been prevented with the updated site layout.
During Site development, good erosion and sediment control practices will be followed. Extensive
silt fencing will be used on the construction Site perimeter and along stream and wetland
boundaries.
Mitigation
Mitigation is typically required by the USACE Nationwide Permit 39 for impacts greater than 0.1-
acre of wetlands and 0.02 acre of stream. Due to the proposed impacts to 0.442 acre of on -Site
wetlands and 0.011 acre (240 linear feet) of on -Site streams, compensatory mitigation is proposed
in the form of purchasing wetland mitigation credits from the Division of Mitigation Service In -
Lieu Fee Program. The mitigation acceptance letter is included in Appendix F.
A North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (WAM) form has been conducted for the on -Site
wetland with proposed impacts (Wetland Area "D"). The WAM form is attached in Appendix G.
The overall WAM rating for the wetland is medium quality. Because the wetland is of medium
2
https://hart]tick.shuepoint.coin/sites/MmtfFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church 14
Road/Permitting/09_C Avoid RodMinimize.docx hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

quality, a mitigation ratio of 2:1 is proposed. At a 2:1 mitigation ratio, 0.88 acre of mitigation is
proposed for impacts to wetlands via the In -Lieu Fee Program.
https://hart]tick.shuepoint.coin/sites/MmtfFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church 14
Road/Permitting/09_C Avoid RodMinimize.docx hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Appendix D
Supplemental Documents
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
July 11, 2022
Danielle Clark
Hart & Hickman, PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Ste 301
Raleigh, NC 27607
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
dclarkgharthickman.com
Re: Construct industrial warehouse building, Henderson Grove Church Road, Salisbury,
Rowan County, ER 22-1497
Dear Ms. Clark:
Thank you for your email of May 19, 2022, the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed the
submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewkncdcr. og_v. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Cameron Ingram, Executive Director
15 June 2022
Ms. Danielle Clark
Hart & Hickman PC
2923 South Tyron Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
Subject: Request for Environmental Review
Henderson Grove Church Road
Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Clark,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) received your email on 19
May 2022. Biologists with NCWRC have reviewed the subject information. Comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is requesting information on the potential impacts to threatened and
endangered species and critical habitats at or near the proposed development project to be located on the
west side of Henderson Grove Church Road and northwest of Interstate Highway 85 in Salisbury, Rowan
County, North Carolina. The 96-acre site is primarily undeveloped land with utility easements and some
residential outbuildings located in the southwestern portion of the site.
Unnamed tributaries of Town Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin occur at the site. A man-made
farm pond occurs in the south-central portion of the site. We have no known records of federal or state
rare, threatened, or endangered species within or adjacent to the site. H&H surveyed the site for federally
protected species and their suitable habitat on 03 March 2022, and no individuals or their habitat were
observed during the field survey. However, the survey was conducted outside the optimal survey window
for Schweinitz's sunflower (Hehanthus schweinitzii), a state and federal endangered species.
We offer the following preliminary recommendations to minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial
wildlife resources.
1. We recommend the proposed development avoid impacting streams and wetlands.
2. Maintain or establish a minimum 100-foot native, undisturbed forested buffer along each side of
perennial streams and 50-foot native, undisturbed forested buffer along each side of intermittent
streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas will minimize
impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources, water quality, and aquatic habitat both within
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
15 June 2022
Henderson Grove Church
Rowan County
and downstream of the project area. Also, wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining
stability of stream banks and for treatment of pollutants associated with urban stormwater.
Non-native plants should not be used for seeding disturbed areas. Specifically, avoid using
Bermudagrass, redtop, tall fescue, and lespedeza, which are invasive and/or non-native. A list of
alternatives to non-native species has been attached. Alternatively, use a grain, such as oats,
wheat, or rye for temporary cover and native seed mixes for permeant seeding. We recommend
planting native, wildflower seed mixes that will create pollinator habitat within the project
boundary.
4. Avoid using invasive, non-native plants in seed mixtures or landscaping plants
(http://www.ncwildflower.org_/plant galleries/invasives_list).
5. We recommend using green construction techniques to improve water, waste, and energy
efficiency, such as environmental -friendly building techniques, construction waste management,
and energy efficient building materials.
Use non-invasive native species and Low Impact Development (LID) technology in landscaping.
Using LID technology in landscaping will not only help maintain the predevelopment hydrologic
regime, but also enhance the aesthetic and habitat value of the site. LID techniques include
bioretention areas that can collect stormwater from driveways and parking areas. Additional
alternatives include narrower roads and swales versus curbs/gutters. Compared to conventional
developments, implementing appropriate LID techniques can be more cost-effective, increase
property values, provide space -saving advantages, reduce runoff, and protect water quality
(https:Howl.cM.org/mdocs-posts/roseen-et-al-2011-forging-the-link/). Also, additional
information on LID can be found at the NC State University LID guide:
http://www.onsiteconsortium.or/g_npsdeal/NC_LID_Guidebook.pdf.
NCWRC's Green Growth Toolbox provides information on nature -friendly planning
(http://www.ncwildlife.org/Conservin /g Programs/GreenGrowthToolbox.aspx).
Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land -disturbing activity.
The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices is strongly
recommended. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose -weave netting
that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical and horizontal
twines. Silt fencing that has been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should be avoided as it
impedes the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have
detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of
eggs, and clogging of gills.
At this time, the information provided is not sufficient for our staff to make definitive recommendations
or conclusions concerning this project. If I can be of additional assistance, please call [phone] or
email olivia.munzerkncwildlife.org.
Sincerely,
Olivia Munzer
Western Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

RECOMMENDED NATIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR NON-NATIVE GRASSES IN
NORTH CAROLINA"
(Species are appropriate for all geographic regions unless otherwise indicated)
NON-NATIVE SPECIES
NATIVE SPECIES
Big bluestem
Andropogon gerardii
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans
Crownvetch
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Centipede
Beaked panicgrass
Panicum anceps
Bermuda
Purpletop
Tridens flavus
Roundheaded bushclover
Lespedeza capitata
Deer tongue
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata
Big bluestem
Andropogon gerardii
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Kentucky bluegrass
Beaked panicgrass
Panicum anceps
Tall fescue
Purpletop
Tridens flavus
Sudangrass
Broomsedge
Andropogon virginicus
Deer tongue
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Canadian wildrye
Elymus canadensis
Virginia wildrye
Elymus virginicus
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Splitbeard bluestem
Andropogon ternarius
Sericea lespedeza
Beggarlice
Desmodium spp.
Kobe lespedeza
Deer tongue
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata
SANDHILLS
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Purple lovegrass
Eragrostis spectabilis
Weeping lovegrass
Muhly Grass
Muhlenbergia capillaris
Bermuda
Wiregrass
Aristida stricter
Buttonweed
Prairie threeawn
Aristida oligantha
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata

NC Native Plant Recommendations
**A recommended revegetation/stabilization mix would ideally include a combination
of the species listed in this table. In addition, please note that additional consideration
may be needed in areas that are (highly) erodible and/or have sloped terrain. The
following species could be included in all regions for additional stabilization and
wildlife benefit:
Black-eyed Susan:
Plains coreopsis:
Lance -leaved coreopsis:
Narrow -leaved sunflower:
Created October 2018
Rudbeckia hirta
Coreopsis tinctoria
Coreopsis lanceolate
Helianthus angustifolius

From:
Hamstead, Byron A
To:
Danielle Clark
Subject:
Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Salisbury Industrial Development; Rowan Co
Date:
Wednesday, December 7, 2022 10:30:59 AM
Attachments:
imaoe001.ipo
imaae002.ipa
Schweitz"s Sunflower Survey - Henderson Grove Church Road (12-6-22).pdf
IPAC Species List Asheville Ecoloaical Services Field Office.pdf
Thanks Danielle,
We have reviewed the information provided in your December 6, 2022, email and offer the
following comments regarding project -mediated impacts to listed species:
Northern long-eared bat
We appreciate your consideration for project -mediated impacts to the federally threatened northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionolis). On September 21, 2022, the consultation range for this animal was
updated based on the best available scientific data. Based on the information provided, the action area
(50CFR 402.02) for this project is now outside of the species' consultation range. Therefore, consultation for
this animal is not required at this location.
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helionthus schweinitzii)
Based on the information provided, suitable habitat occurs within the proposed action area for the
plant species referenced above. However, targeted botanical surveys of all these habitats were
conducted within the appropriate timeframe (September 9, 2022), and did not detect evidence for
this species at that time. Therefore, we believe the probability for project -mediated inadvertent loss
of this plant is insignificant and/or discountable and would concur with "may affect, not likely to
adversely affect" determination from the action agency. These survey results are valid for two years
for the purposes of consultation under the Endangered Species Act (Act):
https://www.fws.gov/story/2022-03/north-carolinas-federally-threatened-endangered-and-risk-
plant-species
Based on the information provided, no other federally protected species or their habitats occur
within the proposed action area and we consider obligations under the Act to be complete at this
time. Please be aware that further coordination and/or consultation may be required under the Act
if: (1) information reveals impacts of this identified action which may affect or may have affected
listed species or critical habitat, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not
considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be
affected by the identified action.
Proposed and Candidate Species
Suitable habitat for tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflovus) may present at the site. On September 14,
2022, the Service published a proposal in the Federal Register to list the tricolored bat as
endangered under the Act. The Service has up to 12 months from the date the proposal published to
make a final determination, either to list the tricolored bat under the Act or to withdraw the
proposal. The Service determined the bat faces extinction primarily due to the range -wide impacts
of WNS. Because tricolored bat populations have been greatly reduced due to WINS, surviving bat
populations are now more vulnerable to other stressors such as human disturbance and habitat loss.

Species proposed for listing are not afforded protection under the Act; however, as soon as a listing
becomes effective (typically 30 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register), the
prohibitions against jeopardizing its continued existence and "take" will apply. Therefore, if you
suspect your future or existing project may affect tricolored bats after the potential new listing goes
into effect, we recommend analyzing possible effects of the project on tricolored bats and their
habitat to determine whether consultation under section 7 of the Act is necessary. Conferencing
procedures can be followed prior to listing to ensure the project does not jeopardize the existence
of a species. Projects with an existing section 7 biological opinion may require re -initiation of
consultation to provide uninterrupted authorization for covered activities. Please contact our office
for additional guidance or assistance.
Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is a candidate species, and we appreciate the project
proponent's consideration of monarch butterfly when evaluating the action area for impacts to
federally listed species and their habitats. The species is not subject to section 7 consultation, and an
effects determination is not necessary. General recommendations for pollinators can be provided
and would be protective of monarch butterfly should the project proponent like to implement them
in the future.
We encourage you to submit these comments to any audience for the purposes of demonstrating
that consultation has been completed with our office. Please contact me if you have any questions
about this or other projects.
Regards,
Byron
Byron Hamstead
(he/him/his)
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and may
be disclosed to third parties.
From: Danielle Clark <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 3:52 PM
To: Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Salisbury Industrial Development; Rowan Co
Hi Byron,

Appendix E
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 4: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Henderson Grove Church Road Industrial Development
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Hart & Hickman, PC conducted a preliminary stream and wetland survey on the site and is requesting a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination as an initial step to potential permitting activities.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Trammell Crow Company
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Danielle Clark - Hart & Hickman, PC
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: None
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Henderson Grove Church Road, Salisbury, NC (Lat/Long: 35.625297,-80.508616)
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 5658-01-16-5137, 5658-01-15-9477, and 5658-01-15-1249
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Rowan
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Salisbury
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Unnamed tributary of Town Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03040103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit 4
Regional General Permit 9
L✓J Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Sent Via Email
February 15, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Attn: Mr. Chris Hopper
Re: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Henderson Grove Church Road
Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina
H&H Job No. TCD-003
Dear Chris:
hart '`
hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
On behalf of Trammell Crow Company, please find the enclosed Preliminary Stream and Wetlands
Survey for the above site in Salisbury, NC. We are seeking a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
(PJD) for the above -mentioned property. Hart & Hickman, PC conducted a preliminary stream and
wetland survey on October 14, 2021. Access authorizations signed by representatives of the property
owners are included with this request. A Jurisdictional Determination Request form and associated
documents are attached in PDF format.
If needed, we would like to schedule a site visit as soon as possible. Please contact us if you have any
questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Hart and Hickman, PC
Matt Bramblett, PE
Principal
Attachments
cc: Mr. Woody Coley, Trammell Crow Company (Via Email)
Ms. Brooke Bures, Trammell Crow Company (Via Email)
Mr. Greg Welsh, PE, Oak Engineering (Via Email)
Danielle Clark, PWS
Sr. Project Environmental Scientist
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd , Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704-586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http: //www. saw. usace. army. mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CounlyLocator. aspx
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
FaxNumber: [phone]
WILNIINGTONREGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Henderson Grove Chuch Road
B.
C.
City, State:
County:
Salisbury, NC
Rowan
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 5658-01-16-5137, 5658-01-15-9477, and
5658-01-15-1249
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Danielle Clark - Hart & Hickman. PC
Mailing Address: 3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number: 518-598-2862
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Thomas O. Eller et al
Mailing Address: PO BOX 1765
Salisbury, NC 28145
Telephone Number: N/A
Electronic Mail Address: N/A
Nancy Bostian Shue
710 Peach Orchard Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

5658-01-15-1249
jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATIONs,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Nancy Shue
Print Name
Capacity: © Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
Date {
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
Q I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
�QCC55.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
BA Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other: — —- —
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 96692F49-517E-46A3-9F70-5B95B854B165
5658-01-15-9477
5658-01-16-5137
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Thomas Eller
Print Name
Capacity: ✓❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
2/1/2022
Dned by:
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
0 I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 95.7 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.625297
Longitude:-80.508616
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).'
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hlW://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatoiy-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
✓❑ Vicinity Map
❑✓ Aerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatorv/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatoa-Permit-Program/Juiisdiction%
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Agent Certification of Authorization
1, Brooke Bures , representing the prospective developer of lands represented by
Parcel Numbers 5658-01-15-9477, 5658-01-16-5137, and 5658-01-15-1249 in Salisbury, Rowan
County, North Carolina (approx. 95.69 acres), certify that I have authorized Hart & Hickman, PC
to act on the prospective developer's behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing,
issuance, and acceptance of a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and 401/404 permitting for
this property.
Prospective Applicant's Signature
Name/Title: Development Manager
Company: TCC
2.7.22
Date
Trammell Crow Company
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27601
512-202-6589
[e-mail]
Agent's Signature
Danielle Clark, PWS
Hart & Hickman, PC
1-�1;-I?m,?
Date

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: February 2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Danielle Clark (H&H)z923South Tryon Street, Suite 100,Charlotte, NC28203
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, TBD
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Rowan City: Salisbury
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.625297 Long.:-80.508616
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Unnamed tributary of Town Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SEE TABLE
ATTACHED

Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resource in
review area
Type of
aquatic
resource
Geographic
authority to
which the
aquatic
resource "may
be" subject
SCA
35.624572
-80.512456
+/- 1,510 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCB - PER
35.626525
-80.509384
+/- 1,230 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCB - INT
35.626604
-80.506610
+/- 170 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCC - PER
35.625913
-80.508457
+/- 163 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCC - INT
35.625417
-80.508281
+/- 234 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCD - PER
35.626281
-80.507117
+/- 37 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCD - INT
35.625833
-80.506679
+/- 470 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
WAA
35.623131
-80.508946
+/- 0.73 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WAB
35.626990
-80.512945
+/- 0.67 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WAC
35.627198
-80.509854
+/- 0.45 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WAD
35.625071
-80.507858
+/- 0.45 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WAE
35.626191
-80.507060
+/- 0.07 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WAF
35.625560
-80.505841
+/- 0.22 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WAG
35.626646
-80.505986
+/- 0.06 AC
Wetland
Section 404
POND "A"
35.624101
-80.510171
+/- 1.20 AC
Non -wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map prepared by H&H dated 2/8/2022
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Rowan Mills/China Grove, 2020, 1:24,000
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure A3 (web Soil survey version 3.1, 2/8/2022)
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure A2 (USFWS Wetlands, 2/8/2022)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
■FEMA/FIRM maps: Figure A5 (3710564800J & 3710565800J dated 2/8/2022)
El
■❑
100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
or ■❑ Other (Name & Date): Site Photos, TCD-003, 10/14/2021
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
■❑ Other information (please specify): Figure A4 (Published soil survey, 2/8/2022)
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
��.
r
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Cowardin_Code
HGM_Code I Meas_Type I
aters_Type -1 NWPR_Determine_Code
Local Waterway
SCA
NORTH CAROLINA
R3
Linear
1,510 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
35.62457200
-80.51245600
SCB- PER
NORTH CAROLINA
R3
Linear
1,230 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
35.62652500
-80.50938400
SCB- INT
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
170 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
35.62660400
-80.50661000
SCC - PER
NORTH CAROLINA
R3
Linear
163 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
35.62591300
-80.50845700
SCC - INT
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
234 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
35.62541700
-80.50828100
SCD-PER
NORTH CAROLINA
R3
Linear
37 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
35.62628100
-80.50711700
SCD - INT
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
470 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
35.62583300
-80.50667900
WAA
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.73 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.62313100
-80.50894600
WAB
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.67 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.62699000
-80.51294500
WAC
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.45 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.62719800
-80.50985400
WAD
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.45 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.62507100
-80.50785800
WAE
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.07 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.62619100
-80.50706000
WAF
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.22 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.62556000
-80.50584100
WAG
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.06 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.62664600
-80.50598600
POND "A"
NORTH CAROLINA
L1
Area
1.2 ACRE
AKPIFLOW
35.62410100
-80.51017100

2/8/22, 4:21 PM
PARID: 407 015
SHUE NANCY BOSTIAN
Parcel
Parcel ID:
Twp/NBHD:
ESN:
Tax Dist:
Zoning:
TR Class
Land Use/Strat:
Legal Desc:
Prop Address:
Undivided Interest:
Rowan County
0 PEACH ORCHARD RD
COMMERCIAL
DEFERRAL
407 015
00507 : LITAKER 07
208: SOUTH SALISBURY
112 SOUTH SALISBURY FIRE DISTRICT
85ED3-1 85 ECONOMIC DEV DIST
C-COMMERCIAL
14-VACANT COMMERCIAL
24.50AC
0 PEACH ORCHARD RD
100.0000
Owner Mailing
Account: 6337724
Owner SHUE NANCY BOSTIAN
Mailing Address 710 PEACH ORCHARD RD
SALISBURY NC 28147
Owner Year: 2023
Land
Line: LT. Land Code: Notes: Units: Acres: Sq Ft: Base Rate Adj Rate: Adj % 1: Adj %2: Land Value
1 A U-U ACRES -OPEN 24.5 1,067,220 8,740 -50 107,065
https://tax.rowancountync.gov/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=407 015&gsp=PROFILEALL&taxyear=2021 &jur=080&ownseq=0&card=1 &roll=REAL&State=1 &item=1 &items=-1 &all=undefined&ranks=D... 1 /2

2/8/22, 4:21 PM Rowan County
Total: 24.5 1,067,220
107,065
Valuation
Appraised Land: 107,065
Appraised Building: 0
Appraised Total: 107,065
Deferred:-93,415
Exempts/Excluded: 0
Taxable Total: 13,650
Field Notes
Number:
Note:
4
LU RQ PER AUDIT EFF 2002
TREXLERC
10/22/01 12:00
3
LU EFF 2001
GRAHAMD
01/08/01 12:00
2
AC & NAME CHG EFF 1-1-99
WILHELMM
10/21/98 12:00
1
TOPO EFF 1-1-95
WHITMANR
05/25/95 12:00
Date Printed:
02/08/2022 04:21
Last Update by:
EOY ROLL
Last Update:
04/20/2020
Recorded Transaction
Sale
ValidityGrantee
Date Book Page Instrument
Price
Code
20-JUN-2019 DC ROWAN 99/659 WILL -
0
7
SHUE NANCY BOSTIAN
WILL/DIV/DEATH/MARRIAGE
01-JAN-1998 802 669 GD - GIFT DEED
0
C
SHUE VICTOR D & WF
NANCY B
01-JAN-1997 802 667 IC - INSTRUMENT OF
0
C
SHUE CARL D & WF
CONVEYANCE
LUCILLE H
https://tax.rowancountync.gov/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=407 015&gsp=PROFILEALL&taxyear=2021 &jur=080&ownseq=0&card=1 &roll=REAL&State=1 &item=1 &items=-1 &all=undefined&ranks=D... 2/2

2/8/22, 4:20 PM Rowan County
PARI D: 407 115
ELLER THOMAS O ETAL 0 HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH RD
Parcel
COMMERCIAL
Parcel ID:
407 115
Twp/NBHD:
00507 : LITAKER 07
ESN:
246: SALISBURY CITY
Tax Dist:
101 CITY OF SALISBURY
Zoning:
LI-2 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
TR Class
I-MANUFACTURING/INDUSTRIAL
Land Use/Strat:
15-VACANT INDUSTRIAL
Legal Desc:
50.96AC
Prop Address:
0 HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH RD
Undivided Interest:
100.0000
Owner Mailing
Account: 6112618
Owner ELLER THOMAS O ETAL
Mailing Address PO BOX 1765
SALISBURY NC 28145
Owner Year: 2023
Land
Land Base Adj Adj Adj Land
Line: LT Notes: Units: Acres: Sq Ft:
Code: Rate Rate: % 1: %2: Value
https://tax.rowancountync.gov/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=407 115&gsp= PROF ILEA LL&taxyear=2021 &jur=080&ownseq=0&card=1 &roll=REAL&State=1 &item=1 &items=-1 &all=undefined&ranks=Da... 1 /2

2/8/22, 4:20 PM
1 A U-U ACRES - UNDEVELOPED
2 A O-O ACRES - OPEN
Total:
Valuation
Appraised Land:
385,726
Appraised Building:
0
Appraised Total:
385,726
Deferred:
0
Exempts/Excluded:
0
Taxable Total:
385,726
Field Notes
Rowan County
20 871,200 8,280 165,600
30.96 1,348,618 7,110 220,126
50.96 2,219,818 385,726
Number: Note:
2 COR DIST EFF 1-2011 HOUCKNC 06/29/11 12:00
1 NEW PARCEL FROM 407-014 EFF 2007 PER PLAT GASKEYRE 06/14/06 12:00
Date Printed:
02/08/2022 04:20
Last Update by:
EOY ROLL
Last Update:
04/20/2020
Recorded Transaction
Date Book Page Instrument Sale ValidityGrantee
Price Code
06-JAN-2006 784 831 SNP - SPL-NEW PARCEL 0 6 ELLER THOMAS O ETAL
https://tax.rowancountync.gov/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=407 115&gsp= PROF ILEA LL&taxyear=2021 &jur=080&ownseq=0&card=1 &roll=REAL&State=1 &item=1 &items=-1 &all=undefined&ranks=Da... 2/2

2/8/22, 4:21 PM Rowan County
PARID: 407 014
ELLER THOMAS O ETAL 0 HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH RD
Parcel
COMMERCIAL
Parcel ID:
407 014
Twp/NBHD:
00507 : LITAKER 07
ESN:
208: SOUTH SALISBURY
Tax Dist:
112 SOUTH SALISBURY FIRE DISTRICT
Zoning:
85ED3-1 85 ECONOMIC DEV DIST
TR Class
C-COMMERCIAL
Land Use/Strat:
14-VACANT COMMERCIAL
Legal Desc:
21.94AC
Prop Address:
0 HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH RD
Undivided Interest:
100.0000
Owner Mailing
Account: 6112618
Owner ELLER THOMAS O ETAL
Mailing Address PO BOX 1765
SALISBURY NC 28145
Owner Year: 2023
Land
Land Base Adj Adj Adj Land
Line: LT Notes: Units: Acres: Sq Ft:
Code: Rate Rate: % 1: %2: Value
https://tax.rowancountync.gov/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=407 014&gsp=PROFILEALL&taxyear=2021 &jur=080&ownseq=0&card=1 &roll=REAL&State=1 &item=1 &items=-1 &all=undefined&ranks=D... 1 /3

2/8/22, 4:21 PM
1 A U-U ACRES - UNDEVELOPED 15 653,400 8,832
2 A O-O ACRES -OPEN 6.94 302,306 7,584
Total: 21.94 955,706
Valuation
Appraised Land:
185,113
Appraised Building:
0
Appraised Total:
185,113
Deferred:
0
Exempts/Excluded:
0
Taxable Total:
185,113
Field Notes
Number: Note:
5 DUKE POWER CO R/W THRU PARCEL
4 LAND SPLIT EFF 2007 (407-115)PER PLAT
3 .49AC TAKEN FOR 1-85 EFF 1-98
2 LAND CMB WITH 407-013 EFF 1-97
1 *BER 7/90
Date Printed:
02/08/2022 04:21
Last Update by:
EOY ROLL
Last Update:
04/20/2020
Recorded Transaction
GASKEYRE
GASKEYRE
STOWEL
HOUCKN
HOUCKN
Rowan County
132,480
52,633
185,113
06/14/06 12:00
06/14/06 12:00
06/11 /98 12:00
01 /16/97 12:00
01 /16/97 12:00
Date Book Page Instrument Sale Price ValidityGrantee
Code
06-JAN-2006 784 831 PT - SPL-PARENT 0 6 ELLER THOMAS O ETAL
TRACT NOT SOLD
11-NOV-1996 784 831 WD - WARRANTY DEED 368,500 $ ELLER THOMAS O &WF,
SAFRIT STEVE A JR &W
https://tax.rowancountync.gov/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=407 014&gsp=PROFILEALL&taxyear=2021 &jur=080&ownseq=0&card=1 &roll=REAL&State=1 &item=1 &items=-1 &all=undefined&ranks=D... 2/3

2/8/22, 4:21 PM
Rowan County
30-MAR-1993 708 452 WD -WARRANTY DEED 60,000 $
FLORIDA TRANSFER &
FREIGHT INC
https://tax.rowancountync.gov/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=407 014&gsp=PROFILEALL&taxyear=2021 &jur=080&ownseq=0&card=1 &roll=REAL&State=1 &item=1 &items=-1 &all=undefined&ranks=D... 3/3

Sent Via Email
February 15, 2022
Trammell Crow Company
555 Fayetteville Street
Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Attn: Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
Re: Preliminary Stream and Wetlands Survey
Undeveloped Land
Henderson Grove Church Road
Salisbury, North Carolina
H&H Job No.TCD-003
Dear Brooke & Woody:
1.0 Introduction
hart '� hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is pleased to present this preliminary stream and wetlands survey
for the property located west of Henderson Grove Church Road and northeast of Peach Orchard
Road in Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site). The Site consists of
three tax parcels (Rowan County Parcel ID Numbers 5658-01-16-5137, 5658-01-15-9477, and
5658-01-15-1249) that total approximately 95.7 acres. The Site currently exists primarily as
undeveloped land with a high transmission utility right-of-way in the southeastern portion of the
Site. An overhead powerline right-of-way is also present through the central portion of the Site
and a sewer easement is present in the northwestern portion of the Site. Residential outbuildings
exist in the southwestern portion of the Site. H&H completed an initial wetland and stream
review on a portion of the Site on August 2, 2021. Since completing the initial wetland and
stream review, the southwestern parcel was added to the overall Site area. A Site location map is
provided as Figure 1, and an aerial map that depicts potential Waters of the US is provided as
Figure 2.
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 2
H&H personnel visited the Site and conducted the delineation on October 14, 2021. The purpose
of the preliminary survey activities was to identify Waters of the US (potential jurisdictional
stream and wetlands) at the Site prior to potential future development activities. A summary of
the preliminary stream and wetlands survey is provided in the following sections.
2.0 Preliminary Stream and Wetland Survey Activities
H&H conducted a preliminary stream and wetlands survey of the subject Site, which consisted of
1) a desktop review of maps and environmental documents; and 2) a Site -specific survey for
streams, wetlands, and surface water features. A summary of the survey activities is provided
below.
2.1 Map and Environmental Document Review
In order to evaluate the potential presence of streams and wetlands on the subject Site, H&H
performed the following:
• reviewed the Rowan Mills and China Grove, North Carolina (2020) US Geological
Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic maps with coverage of the subject Site;
• reviewed the Rowan County Geographical Information System (GIS) website for the
presence of water bodies and floodplains on the subject Site
(https:Hgis.rowancountync.gov/gismaps/);
• reviewed the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
map for the presence of potential jurisdictional wetlands and surface water features on the
subject Site (https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html);
• reviewed the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS) Web Soil Survey website for potential hydric soil series
present on the subject Site(https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm);
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - h a I L: h i c km a n
TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 3
• reviewed the USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Published Soil Survey of Rowan
County (2004) for soil series and the presence of water bodies on the subject Site; and
• reviewed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate
Maps (FIRM) for the presence of floodplains on the subject Site
(https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search).
A copy of the USGS topographic map is included as Figure 1, and copies of the GIS information,
NWI map, soil survey maps, and flood map are included in Appendix A. Information obtained
from our review of these documents is summarized below.
USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Mgp
H&H reviewed the USGS 7.5-minute topographic maps with coverage of the subject Site. The
USGS maps depict two unnamed tributaries of Town Creek in the northern and southwestern
portions of the Site. A pond constructed with a dam is also depicted in -line with the unnamed
tributary in the southwestern portion of the Site. In addition, Town Creek and associated
wetland symbology is depicted adjacent to the west of the Site. The topographic gradient and
surface drainage in the northern and southeastern portions of the Site slope toward the on -Site
stream depicted in the northern portion of the Site. The topographic gradient and surface
drainage in the southwestern portion of the Site slope toward the on -Site stream depicted in the
southwestern portion of the Site. Both streams flow in a northwesterly direction toward Town
Creek located adjacent to the west of the Site.
Rowan County GIS
H&H reviewed the Rowan County GIS website to determine if surface water bodies or
floodplains are depicted on the subject Site. The Rowan County GIS website depicts two
unnamed tributaries of Town Creek located in the northern and southwestern portion of the Site,
and a dammed pond located in -line with the unnamed tributary in the southwestern portion of the
Site. The Rowan County GIS website also depicts Town Creek located adjacent to the west of
the Site. In addition, the regulatory floodway of Town Creek is depicted in the northwestern
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - h a I L: h i c km a n
TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 4
portion of the Site, and the 100-year floodplain of Town Creek is depicted in the western and
west -central portions of the Site.
NWI Map
H&H reviewed the NWI map for potential jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters. The NWI
map depicts two stream features in the northern and southwestern portions of the Site, and an in -
line pond in the southwestern portion of the Site. NWI classifies the stream features as R4SCB,
which is defined as an intermittent riverine system with a streambed bottom that is seasonally
flooded. NWI classifies the in -line pond as PUBHh, which is defined as a palustrine feature with
an unconsolidated bottom that is permanently flooded and has been diked or impounded.
USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey
H&H reviewed soil survey information and identified two potentially hydric soil series depicted
on the subject Site: Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, (ChA) and
Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes, (SeB). The ChA and SeB soil series
sometimes exhibit characteristics of a hydric soil, which are typically associated with
consistently saturated soil such as in wetland areas. The ChA series is depicted in the
southwestern portion of the Site, and the SeB series is depicted in the north -central, northeastern,
east -central, southeastern, and south-central portions of the Site.
USDA SCS Published Soil Survey
H&H reviewed soil information on the published soil survey and identified multiple soil series
including the potentially hydric soil series ChA and SeB on the Site. No other potentially hydric
soil series were identified on the Site. The published soil survey depicts an unnamed tributary of
Town Creek in the northern portion of the Site and a dammed water feature in the southwestern
portion of the Site. Town Creek is also depicted adjacent to the west of the Site.
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - h a I L: h i c km a n
TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 5
FEMA FIRM
The FEMA FIRM panels depict the 100-year and 500-year floodplains associated with Town
Creek in the northwestern and western portions of the Site. The regulatory floodway of Town
Creek is also depicted in the northwestern portion of the Site.
2.2 Site -Specific Survey
On October 14, 2021, H&H performed a preliminary stream and wetlands survey on the Site in
accordance with the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Manual and the Regional
Supplement to the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Region (Version 2.0), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of
Water Resources (DEQ DWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and Their Origins (Version 4.11). Hydric soil, wetland hydrology, and wetland
vegetation must be present to classify an area as a wetland. H&H flagged potential stream
channels and wetland areas in the field using an alphanumeric system, and flag locations were
collected utilizing a handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. A summary of the survey
activities is provided below.
Stream Survey
H&H surveyed the Site for potential streams or surface water features. H&H observed the
following potentially jurisdictional streams on the subject Site:
• Stream Channel "A" (SCA) — SCA originates off -Site to the south and flows onto the Site
at the Site's southern boundary. SCA flows in a generally northwesterly direction with
discharge into the upgradient section of Pond "A" in the south-central portion of the Site.
SCA continues at the downgradient dammed section of Pond "A" at the pond spillway in
the southwestern portion of the Site. SCA flows in a generally northwesterly direction
through the southwestern portion of the Site before flowing off -Site at the Site's western
boundary. SCA represents the unnamed tributary of Town Creek depicted in the
southwestern portion of the Site on the mapping resources discussed above. H&H
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - h a I : h i c km a n
TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 6
observed a defined ordinary high-water mark (OHWM), defined bed and bank, and
discernable baseflow within SCA. SCA appears to intersect the water table throughout
the majority of the year. H&H used DEQ DWR's Stream Identification Form (version
4.11), which indicates that SCA appears to maintain characteristics consistent with a
perennial stream. SCA totals approximately 1,510 feet of on -Site length.
• Stream Channel `B" (SCB) — SCB originates at a headcut at the downgradient section of
Wetland Area "G" (WAG) in the northeastern portion of the Site. At this point, a defined
bed and bank and an OHWM are present, and SCB appears to seasonally intersect the
water table. SCB flows to the west-southwest before reaching an additional transitional
headcut in the northeastern portion of the Site. SCB transitions to a perennial stream
channel downgradient of this headcut and appears to intersect the water table for the
majority of the year. SCB flows in a generally west -northwesterly direction through the
north -central portion of the Site before flowing off -Site at the northern Site boundary.
SCB represents the unnamed tributary of Town Creek depicted in the northern portion of
the Site on the mapping resources discussed above. H&H used DEQ DWR's Stream
Identification Form (version 4.11), which indicates that SCB is intermittent upgradient of
the transitional headcut and SCB is perennial downgradient of the transitional headcut.
The intermittent portion of SCB totals approximately 170 linear feet of on -Site length,
and the perennial portion of SCB totals approximately 1,230 linear feet of on -Site stream
length, with a total length of approximately 1,400 linear feet.
• Stream Channel "C" (SCC) — SCC originates at a headcut at the downgradient section of
Wetland Area "D" (WAD) in the central portion of the Site. At this point, a defined bed
and bank and an OHWM are present, and SCC appears to seasonally intersect the water
table. SCC flows to the north-northwest before reaching an additional transitional
headcut in the central portion of the Site. SCC transitions to a perennial stream channel
downgradient of this headcut and appears to intersect the water table for the majority of
the year. SCC flows in a generally north -northwesterly direction before reaching a
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - h a I L: h i c km a n
TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 7
confluence with SCB in the north -central portion of the Site. H&H used DEQ DWR's
Stream Identification Form (version 4.11), which indicates that SCC is intermittent
upgradient of the transitional headcut and SCC is perennial downgradient of the
transitional headcut. The intermittent portion of SCC totals approximately 234 linear feet
of on -Site length and the perennial portion of SCC totals approximately 163 linear feet of
on -Site stream length, with a to,tal length of approximately 397 linear feet.
• Stream Channel "D" (SCD) — SCD originates at a headcut within Wetland Area "F"
(WAF) in the eastern portion of the Site. At this point, a defined bed and bank and an
OHWM are present, and SCD appears to seasonally intersect the water table. SCD flows
in a generally west -northwesterly direction before reaching a transitional headcut in the
northeastern portion of the Site. SCD transitions to a perennial stream channel
downgradient of this headcut and appears to intersect the water table for the majority of
the year. SCD flows to the north-northwest before reaching a confluence with SCB in the
northeastern portion of the Site. H&H used DEQ DWR's Stream Identification Form
(version 4.11), which indicates that SCD is intermittent upgradient of the transitional
headcut and SCD is perennial downgradient of the transitional headcut. The intermittent
portion of SCD totals approximately 470 linear feet of on -Site length, and the perennial
portion of SCD totals approximately 37 linear feet of on -Site stream length, with a total
length of approximately 507 linear feet.
The stream features are depicted on Figure 2, and representative data forms and photos are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively.
Wetland Survey
During our Site visit, H&H investigated potential wetland areas for the presence of hydrology
indicators, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil indicators. H&H delineated seven potentially
jurisdictional wetland areas on the Site. H&H advanced test pit borings in the potential wetland
areas to document the wetland criteria and noted that soils sampled in the wetland areas
exhibited characteristics consistent with those of a hydric soil. H&H also observed the primary
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - h a I L: h i c km a n
TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 8
hydrologic indicators and sufficient obligate to facultative wetland vegetation located at the
wetland test pit borings within the potential wetland areas. In addition, test pit borings were
advanced in upland areas at the Site to document upland conditions. H&H observed the
following potentially jurisdictional wetland areas on the subject Site:
• Welland Area "A" (WAA) — WAA is a riparian wetland that is adjacent to and surrounds
the banks of SCA in the southern portion of the Site. WAA drains in a northwesterly
direction into SCA and Pond "A". WAA encompasses approximately 0.73 acre of on -
Site area. Vegetation consists primarily of hardwood saplings, mature deciduous trees,
and vine species.
• Wetland Area `B" (WAB) — WAB is a floodplain wetland located in the low-lying
floodplain area of Town Creek in the northwestern portion of the Site. WAB drains in a
generally west -northwesterly direction toward Town Creek located off -Site to the west.
WAB encompasses approximately 0.67 acre of on -Site area. Vegetation consists
primarily of hardwood saplings, mature deciduous trees, herbaceous species, and vine
species.
• Wetland Area "C" (WAC) — WAC is a riparian wetland that is adjacent to and surrounds
the banks of SCB in the northern portion of the Site. WAC drains in a northwesterly
direction into SCB and appears to continue off -Site at the northern Site boundary. WAC
encompasses approximately 0.45 acre of on -Site area. Vegetation consists of deciduous
hardwoods, hardwood saplings, and vine species.
• Wetland Area "D" (WAD) — WAD is a headwater wetland located in a topographic
crenulation in the central portion of the Site. WAD drains in a northwesterly direction
into SCC and encompasses approximately 0.45 acre of on -Site area. Vegetation consists
of deciduous hardwoods, herbaceous, and vine species.
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - h a I L: h i c km a n
TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 9
• Wetland Area "E" (WAE) — WAE is a riparian wetland located adjacent to and surrounds
the banks of SCD in the northeastern portion of the Site. WAE drains in a northwesterly
direction into SCD and encompasses approximately 0.07 acre of on -Site area. Vegetation
consists of deciduous hardwoods, herbaceous, and vine species.
• Welland Area "F" (WAF) — WAF is a headwater wetland located in a topographic
crenulation in the northeastern portion of the Site. WAC drains in a westerly direction
into SCD and encompasses approximately 0.22 acre of on -Site area. Vegetation consists
of deciduous hardwoods, herbaceous, and vine species.
• Wetland Area "G" (WAG) —WAG is a linear headwater wetland located in a topographic
crenulation in the northeastern portion of the Site. WAG receives drainage from a culvert
pipe installed beneath Henderson Grove Church Road that discharges into WAG at the
eastern Site boundary. WAG drains in a westerly direction into SCB and encompasses
approximately 0.06 acre of on -Site area. Vegetation consists of deciduous hardwoods,
herbaceous, and vine species.
The wetland areas are depicted on Figure 2, and representative data forms and photos are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively.
Open Water Survey
H&H surveyed the Site for potential surface water features other than streams and wetlands, and
observed one pond located in the southwestern portion of the Site.
• Pond "A" appears to be constructed with a dam in the southwestern portion of the Site.
Pond "A" is in -line with SCA and represents the dammed pond depicted in the
southwestern portion of the Site on the mapping resources discussed above. Pond "A"
drains in a northwesterly direction into SCA at the downgradient spillway of the pond.
Pond "A" encompasses approximately 1.20 acres of on -Site area.
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - h a I L: h i c km a n
TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 10
3.0 Permitting for Stream and Wetland Impacts
Proposed impacts to streams, wetlands, and/or surface water features require Section 404/401
permits from the Corps and DWR, respectively. H&H recommends that the streams, wetlands,
and pond be verified by the Corps during a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Site
visit. Only the Corps can determine if jurisdictional features exist. If the Corps concurs with the
preliminary findings of this survey, Section 404/401 permits will be required if future
development plans include impacts to the on -Site streams, wetlands, and/or pond.
The Corps published Nationwide Permits (NWPs) including NWP 939, which went into effect
on March 15, 2021. The NWP 939 allows for cumulative impacts of 0.5 acre to streams,
wetlands, and open waters for commercial and institutional developments. In response NWP
939, the North Carolina DEQ DWR published corresponding Water Quality Certificate (WQC)
94263, which also went into effect on March 15, 2021. According to WQC #4263, an Individual
401 WQC will be required if impacts exceed 150 linear feet of stream or 0.1 acre of wetland.
The Individual 401 WQC requires the publication of an electronic Public Notice, which is
published by DEQ DWR during their review timeframe. Finally, the Corps Wilmington District
has finalized regional conditions associated with the NWPs, which limits the loss of stream bed
to 0.05 acre under the NWP program. As noted above, the current NWP 939 allows up to 0.5
acre of cumulative wetland, stream, and open water impact with potential mitigation provided
the applicant can: I) justify avoidance of wetland/stream impacts where practicable, and 2)
minimize impacts to wetland/streams where impacts cannot be avoided. Please be aware that
new NWPs may be issued in March 2022 with different criteria than the current ones. If impacts
to on -Site streams and wetlands exceed 0.5 acre or other criteria noted above, an Individual
Permit will be required.
Rowan County regulates environmental buffers as detailed in Chapter 18 of the Code of
Ordinances. The ordinance enforces a 30-foot undisturbed buffer along lakes or natural
watercourses. Natural watercourses are defined in Chapter 18 to include streams, natural or
impounded ponds, and others that move or carry sediment and that could be damaged by the
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - a I : h i c km a n
TCD/TCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Brooke Bures
Mr. Woody Coley
February 15, 2022
Page 11
accumulation of sediment. In accordance with the ordinance, the jurisdictional boundary of the
buffer is measured from the top of the stream bank and extends landward 30 feet.
Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. Please contact us should you have
questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Hart and Hickman, PC
Matt Bramblett, PE
Principal
J .
Dan McCauley
Project Environmental Scientist
Danielle Clark, PWS
Senior Project Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map
Appendix A —
Support Documents
Appendix B —
Survey Field Forms
Appendix C —
Site Photographs
https://huthick.shuepoint.com/sites/A4mterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Trammell Crow Company - h a I L: h i c km a n
/T TCDCD-003 Henderson Grove Church Road/Delin Memo/Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Figures
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVI ROHM ENTAL SOLUTIONS

ARSON i7R 1
i
!l rgp0� r AID
GAt'
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation
Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset,
and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S.
Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data;
U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA
National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief
Model. Data refreshed May, 2020.
TITLE
0 2,000 4,000 SITE LOCATION MAP
_ SCALE IN FEET PROJECT
UNDEVELOPED LAND
HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
® 2923 South Tryon Street- Suite 100
ROWAN MILLS, CHINA GROVE, ROCKWELL, AND hart 1 hickman Charlotte, North Carolina28203
704-586-0007 (p> 704-5s6-0373 (f)
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA 2020
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS License 4 C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
s QUADRANGLE DATE: 2/15/2022 REVISION NO: 0
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) JOB NO: TCD-003 FIGURE NO: 1

if.
x v '
' * r LEGEND
- SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TEST PIT
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL PERENNIAL STREAM
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL INTERMITTENT STREAM
F H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL POND
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL WETLAND
POTENTIAL STREAM CHANNEL
STREAM CHANNEL ID APPROXIMATE LENGTH (LF)
SCA 1,510
SCB 1,230(PERENNIAL)
SCB 170 (INTERMITTENT)
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S. (WAC) SCC 163 (PERENNIAL)
WE
TLAND ETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S. (WAB) 7, SCC 234 (INTERMITTENT)
' .� • SCD 37 (PERENNIAL)
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (SCB) SCD 470 (INTERMITTENT)
ON -SITE STREAM TOTAL 3,814
I
POTENTIAL POND (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (POND "A")
4
- j POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S. (WAA)
�!
r'
wN�h
r.�
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S. (WAG)
. CULVERT
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S. (WAE)
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (SCD)
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S. (WAF) =p
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (SCC)
POTENTIAL WETLAND AREA
WETLAND AREA ID
APPROXIMATE AREA ACRES
WAA
0.73
WAB
0.67
WAC
0.45
WAD
0.45
WAE
0.07
WAF
0.22
WAG
0.06
WETLAND TOTAL
2.65
POTENTIAL OPEN WATER
OPEN WATER ID
APPROXIMATE AREA (ACRES)
POND AREA "A"
1.20
NOTE
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S. (WAD)
1.
SC - STREAM CHANNEL
LF - LINEAR FEET
WA - WETLAND AREA
2.
DELINEATION COMPLETED BY H&H ON 10/14/21
ra,
3.
SIZE & LOCATIONS OF SITE FEATURES ARE
•
APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTAINED USING
A TRIMBLE GPS UNIT
•
4.
FLAGGED BOUNDARIES OF FEATURES ARE SUBJECT
IRAJr +'
y
TO THE REVIEW OF A US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
•- ^'
_
REPRESENTATIVE AND MAY BE ALTERED DURING A
r3l.
`�
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SITE VISIT, WHICH
COULD CHNAGE SIZES AND/OR LOCATIONS OF
FEATURES
_JL
_
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (SCA)
l
{
APPROXIMATE
r
0 400 800
SCALE IN FEET
TITLE
PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
PROJECT UNDEVELOPED LAND
p P
'- y
HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street, Ste. 100
hart P%w hickman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
�".
704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (t7
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
X ti` •��
DATE: 2/15/2022 REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. TCD-003 FIGURE NO. 2

Appendix A
Support Documents
• Rowan County GIS Map (Figure A1)
• NWI Map (Figure A2)
• Soil Survey Maps (Figures A3 & A4)
• FEMA Flood Map (Figure A5)
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVI ROHM ENTAL SOLUTIONS

A.
♦ f I YYY...•
t rs
SITE
r
+'� •��• sue' r� �'Lti', �' r � -- A
It
o _ 19
r,
Sola'rlce: Esri, Maxar, e • e eo • a • hip /
USGS, Ae oG I I a d e l eimmitiI
TITLE
U
F
I 0 1,000 2,000 ROWAN COUNTY GIS MAP
I V SCALE IN FEET PROJECT UNDEVELOPED LAND
U
HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
E ROWAN COUNTY GIS WEBSITE
2923 South Tryon Street -Suite 100
OPEN MAPPING DATA hart hiCkman Charlotte,
04I 86-00o7�c704-i 86-0303
73
(p) 704-586-0373 (f)
SMARTER FtMR]NKAENTAL SOLLI TIONS License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
< NOTE: DATE: 2/8/2022 REVISION NO: 0
3 1) A PUBLICALLY AVAILABLE FLOODPLAIN DATA LAYER WAS NOT AVAILABLE ON THE ROWAN
r COUNTY GIS WEBSITE; THEREFORE, FLOODPLAINAREAS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE FIGURE. JOB NO: TCD-003 FIGURE NO: Al

r R„ M ,rrt r 3R p d�
PUBHh z•a'j�f
IU
R` _ ���j y�
a�
� _ t
r y` /•1' A: •f'r': 4 e'R.1i�4r'*Lv.4 r
r I.
SITE 'PF01A.�r
y - rI s
r'
�f5013H
o
U �
_ 1
Source: Esri, Maxar, e• a eo aphis /
,9< USGS, Ae 50 I a d e l e oInk
p TITLE
U
F
I 0 1,000 2,000 NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP
E I V SCALE IN FEET PROJECT UNDEVELOPED LAND
U
HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
E
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
E
12
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE 03040103 2923 SouthTryon street- suite 100
hart "'L hiekman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p)704-586-0373 (t)
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY (NWI) SMARTER EWRON MENTAL SOLUTIONS License 4 C-1269 / 4 C-245 Geology
< DATE: 2/8/2022 REVISION NO: 0
3
JOB NO: TCD-003 FIGURE NO: A2

DoB
1
CeB2
EuB
Px
MbB DoB WaA
L B2 :MbB
EnB
Ud Ud
CfB
SITE
MbB \\ PxC
Er
SeB _
CcB
CeB2 MbB
EnB
bC
ChA
WaA CeB2
CeB2
CeB2
MbB
r VaB
VaB
MbB
WaA
VaB ApB CcB
PaD CcB
VaB
1 \ VaC VaB
MbC
SeB EnB ApB
EnB PaD
Uf Ud SeB EnC
CeB2
En
ApB
' EnB
ArA
VaB
SeB
VaB
j UTLE
J
0 1,000 2,000 WEB SOIL SURVEY MAP
_ SCALE IN FEET PROJECT
UNDEVELOPED LAND
HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street - Suite 100
USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (SCS) hart 1%. hiCkman charlotte, North Carolina zRzo3
704-586-0007 (p)704-586-0373 (f)
WARTER F.WrR]NKAENTAL SOLLMONS License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
ROWAN COUNTY, NC159
L DATE: 2/8/2022 REVISION NO: 0
s
WEB SOIL SURVEY
JOB NO: TCD-003 FIGURE NO: A3

IN
0 1,000 2,000
iiii
N SCALE IN FEET
USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (SCS)
ROWAN COUNTY, SHEETS 6 AND 11
PUBLISHED 2004
°I PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY

73,
x_
CIIY'IlF
-
,�
Qe� �
SITE �5
Fa na Vy
k Yi�
Nail n.. S
` I
�� ZONE A'E
TOWN CREEK REGULATORY FLOODWAY
=500-YEARODPLAIN
iF
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN
r. 'a
r
f
7744&L
IIIIIIIIIIIIF A
j TITLE
J
0 1,000 2,000 FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
_ SCALE IN FEET PROJECT
UNDEVELOPED LAND
HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGMENT AGENCY (FEMA) SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street- Suite 100
PANEL 3710564800J AND 3710565800J hart hickman Charlotte, North Carolina28203
- 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)
REVISED 6/1 6/2009
ShTARTER F.WrR]N0.9ENTAL SOLLI TIONS License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
s FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) DATE: 2/8/2022 REVISION NO: 0
JOB NO: TCD-003 FIGURE NO: A5

Appendix B
Survey Field Forms
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVI ROHM ENTAL SOLUTIONS

SCA-Perennial
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/14/21
Project/Site:Henderson Grove Church Rd
Latitude: 35.625200
Evaluator: H&H - DWM
county: Rowan
Longitude:-80.513400
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. Quad Name: Rowan Mills
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30` 32.5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
20
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Q
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
W
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes -
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
O2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
U
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other =0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SCB-Intermittent
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/14/21
Project/Site:Henderson Grove Church Rd
Latitude: 35.625851
Evaluator: H&H - DWM
county: Rowan
Longitude:-80.506509
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral 411termitten Perennial
e.g. quad Name: Rowan Mills
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* 22.5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 11.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1Q
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No KD
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
10
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
QO
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other =0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SCB-Perennial
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/14/21
Project/Site:Henderson Grove Church Rd
Latitude: 35.626280
Evaluator: H&H - DWM
county: Rowan
Longitude:-80.507012
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream isatleast intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. quad Name: Rowan Mills
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* 31.5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 18 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
20
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Q
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes -
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
O2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
U
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other =0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SCC-Intermittent
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1 O/14/21
Project/Site:Henderson Grove Church Rd
Latitude: 35.625473
Evaluator: H&H - DWM
County: Rowan
Longitude:-80.508188
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral termitten Perennial
e.g. quad Name: Rowan Mills
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* 24
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
Q
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
(
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No KD
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
10
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
Q
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
QO
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other =0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SCC-Perennial
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/14/21
Project/Site:Henderson Grove Church Rd
Latitude: 35.626045
Evaluator: H&H - DWM
county: Rowan
Longitude:-80.508565
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream isatleast intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. quad Name: Rowan Mills
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* 32.5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
20
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Q
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
W
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes -
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
O2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
U
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other =0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SCD-Intermittent
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/14/21
Project/Site:Henderson Grove Church Rd
Latitude: 35.626669
Evaluator: H&H - DWM
county: Rowan
Longitude:-80.506276
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral 411termitten Perennial
e.g. quad Name: Rowan Mills
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* 23
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 11.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1Q
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
10
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =0
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
QO
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other =0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SCD-Perennial
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/14/21
Project/Site:Henderson Grove Church Rd
Latitude: 35.626398
Evaluator: H&H - DWM
county: Rowan
Longitude:-80.507175
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream isatleast intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. quad Name: Rowan Mills
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* 31
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 18 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
20
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Q
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes -
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
O2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
U
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other =0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-1
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 5-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.626941 Long:-80.510048 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (SeB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-1
HDsomie
uominani
inaicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acerruburm
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
15
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
10
No
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
5
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Rubus argutus
20
Yes
FACU
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
70
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
40
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
40
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators of hydric soils are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-2
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.627036 Long:-80.509801 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (SeB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-2
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
15
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
55
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
11
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
10
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 5/1 85 10YR 5/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
8-20 10YR 5/2 85 10YR 5/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-3
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.624765 Long:-80.507316 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (SeB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-3
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
70
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
15
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
15
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/1 85 10YR 5/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-20 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-4
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.624250 Long:-80.506241 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (SeB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-4
HDsomie
uominani
inaicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
5
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
50
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators of hydric soils are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 8/2/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-5
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.626075 Long:-80.506811 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (SeB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-5
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
60
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
10
No
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
90
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
45
20% of total cover:
18
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
10
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/1 85 10YR 5/6 15 C M Loamy/Clayey
6-20 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-6
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.625873 Long:-80.506623 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (SeB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-6
HDsomie
uominani
inaicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
40
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
40
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Rubus argutus
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
15
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
95
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
48 20% of total cover:
19
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
30
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
30
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators of hydric soils are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-7
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.625591 Long:-80.505817 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (SeB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-7
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
50
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
90
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
10
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/1 85 10YR 5/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-20 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-8
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 5-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.626632 Long:-80.506254 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (SeB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-8
HDsomie
uominani
inaicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
5
No
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
5
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Rubus argutus
20
Yes
FACU
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
80
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
40
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
40
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-8
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators of hydric soils are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-9
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.626564 Long:-80.505561 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (SeB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-9
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
50
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
40
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
70
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
20
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/1 85 10YR 5/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-20 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-10
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.627072 Long:-80.512922 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-10
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Betula nigra
30
Yes
FACW
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
80
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
20
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-10
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/2 85 10YR 5/6 15 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
3-20 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-11
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.626699 Long:-80.512859 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (EnB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-11
HDsomie
uominani
inaicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
50
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Rubus argutus
30
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
90
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
30
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
30
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-11
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators of hydric soils are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-12
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.623504 Long:-80.508828 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, (EnB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-12
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acerruburm
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Rubus argutus
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
5
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
50
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-12
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators of hydric soils are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Henderson Grove Church Road City/County: Rowan Sampling Date: 10/14/21
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-13
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Salisbury
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.623199 Long:-80.508629 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, (EnB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Dataform is representative of wetland 'A'
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-13
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer ruburm
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Betula nigra
30
Yes
FACW
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
80
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
20
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/1 85 10YR 5/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-20 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix(S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

Appendix C
Site Photographs
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVI ROHM ENTAL SOLUTIONS

c')
0
0
0
U
H
Photograph 1: General view of the SCA in the southern portion of the Site
Photograph 2: General view of the perennial portion of SCB in the northeastern portion of the Site
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 UNDEVELOPED LAND
hart T%m hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
® 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA

Cl)
0
0
0
U
H
Photograph 3: General view of the intermittent portion of SCC in the central portion of the Site
Photograph 4: General view of WAA in the southern portion of the Site
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 UNDEVELOPED LAND
hart T%w hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
W 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(fl SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA

c')
0
0
0
U
H
Photograph 5: General view of WAF in the northeastern portion of the Site
Photograph 6: General view of WAG in the northeastern portion of the Site
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 UNDEVELOPED LAND
hart T%m hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
® 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA

Photograph 7: General view of Pond "A" in the southern portion of the Site
Photograph 8: General view of upland area in the southwestern portion of the Site
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100
hart '°r• hickman Charlotte, NC 28203
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f)
UNDEVELOPED LAND
HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA

c')
0
0
0
U
H
Photograph 9: Hydric soils observed within WAA
Photograph 10: Hydric soils observed within WAF
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 UNDEVELOPED LAND
hart T%m hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 HENDERSON GROVE CHURCH ROAD
® 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA

Appendix F
Mitigation Acceptance Letter
hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 29, 2022
Brooke Burnes
Trammell Crow Company
555 Fayetteville St, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27601 Expiration of Acceptance: June 29, 2023
Project: Henderson Grove Church Road Industrial Development County: Rowan
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Yadkin
03040103
Riparian Wetland
0.88
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Danielle Clark, agent
` ilg�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Janes Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 2 7699 -1652
oerartnic:r. nl Cnr ionMePlal � 919,707,8976

Appendix G
NC WAM Form
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
maun ,,aicuiacor version w. i
Wetland Site Name Wetland Area "D" Date 10/14/21
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Dan McCauley - H&H
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Six Mile Creek
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040103
Yes No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-deqrees) 35.625071,-80.507858
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? i` Yes : No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
F Anadromous fish
F Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
F NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
F Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
F Publicly owned property
F N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
F Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
F Designated NCNHP reference community
F Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) 7 Lunar Wind Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? (_ Yes 4 No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver?
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions?
�'_ Yes is No
- Yes is No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
C A C A Not severely altered
1:6 B 1:6 B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for
North Carolina hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch
<- 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and ditch
sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
A (- A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
u'i B u'i B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
I;— C C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief- assessment area/wetland type condition metric (answer for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a. A A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
B - B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C - C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
I'Ls D us D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. 1. A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
C B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
Ce C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. ri" A Sandy soil
rii B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
ri" C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features

C D
Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
C E
Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. t: A
Soil ribbon < 1 inch
C B
Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. (-a A
No peat or muck presence
C B
A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
,: A % A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B C B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
C r C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
F--' A F A F A >_ 10% impervious surfaces
F B 17 B Fw B < 10% impervious surfaces
7 C F C F C Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
F D F D F_ D >_ 20% coverage of pasture
F E F E F_ E >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
F_ F F7 F F F >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
F G F G F_ G >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
F_ H F H F H Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
," Yes i`_ No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of the wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
(� A >_ 50 feet
(` B From 30 to < 50 feet
(` C From 15 to < 30 feet
{' D From 5 to < 15 feet
r E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
:s <- 15-feet wide - > 15-feet wide (- Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
i1 Yes No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
is Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
d`- Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the wetland complex at the assessment areas (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
�C A d`- A z 100 feet
C B - B From 80 to < 100 feet
( C - C From 50 to < 80 feet
(` D D From 40 to < 50 feet
C E C E From 30 to < 40 feet
(o F (J F From 15 to < 30 feet
,-G ('G From 5 to < 15 feet
L- H ( H < 5 feet
9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
(s B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
(` C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
,is A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
t` A A A >_ 500 acres
i`- B B - B From 100 to < 500 acres

f C
f C
f C
From 50 to < 100 acres
C` D
f D
D
From 25 to < 50 acres
f E
f E
C E
From 10 to < 25 acres
C` F
C` F
C F
From 5 to < 10 acres
C` G
C: G
C G
From 1 to < 5 acres
C` H
C` H
C` H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
I
f I
f: I
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
J
f J
C J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
K
i K
C K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
A A >_ 500 acres
B B From 100 to < 500 acres
C 4 C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D From 10 to < 50 acres
E E < 10 acres
F F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts.
Consider the eight main points of the compass.
A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
;'j B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
-- C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
1;'0 B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).
17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
CW Yes d` No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
" B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace
above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA
WT
c
C A
C` A
Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
C
m
C: B
{e B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U
C C
C C
Canopy sparse or absent
o
C: A
C: A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
C B
C` B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
C C
C` C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
n
C A
C-' A
Dense shrub layer
Co B
W B
Moderate density shrub layer
C C
C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
n
C A
A
Dense herb layer
C: B
a B
Moderate density herb layer
_
it C
`— C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags —wetland type condition metric
A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12-inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
1;'0 B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12-inch DBH.
C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.

20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
= A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
1;'0 B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
.A =B —C =D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive
ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
,;4 A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
= B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
= C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
= D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Area "D"
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Date 10/14/21
Assessor Name/Organization Dan McCauley - H&H
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Conditon
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM