Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0002653_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230206State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources n1WR WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION Division of Water Resources NON -DISCHARGE APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM January 12, 2023 To: RRO-WQROS: Scott Vinson.' Vanessa Manuel From: Cord Anthony, Water Quality Permitting Section - Non -Discharge Branch Permit Number: WQ0002653 Applicant: Kenneth G. and Tonya L. Page Owner Type: Individual Facility Name: 601 Virgil Rd. SFR Signature Authority: Kenneth G. and Tonya L. Page Address: 601 Virgil Rd., Durham, NC 27703 Permit Type: Single -Family Residence Wastewater Irrigation Project Type: Renewal Owner in BIMS? Yes Facility in BIMS? Yes Title: Owners County: Durham Fee Category: Single -Family Residence Wastewater Irrigaton Fee Amount: $0 -Renewal Comments/Other Information: tonyapage3@yahoo.com; arizonahilll@hotmail.com > Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your review, comment, and/or action. > Please provide the name of the Regional Office reviewer to the Central Office staff. > Within 45 calendar days of application receipt, please return a completed staff report to the Central Office reviewer noted above. FORM: WQROSNDARR 09-15 Page 1 of 1 ID4 140 State of North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Quality Regional Operations Section F_nvironll ental Staff Report Quality To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit Attn: Cord Anthony From: Curtis Tyree Raleieh Application No.: WQ0002653 Facility Name: 601 Virgil Rd. Durham NC, SFR County: Durham Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non - discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable. I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION 1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No a. Date of site visit:02-06-2023 b. Site visit conducted by: Curtis Tyree c. Inspection report attached? Yes d. Person contacted: Tonya Page and their contact information: 919-475-1754 e. Driving directions: 2. Discharge Point(s): Latitude: Longitude: Latitude: Longitude: 3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Classification: River Basin and Sub -basin No. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS 1. Facility Classification: SFR (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit) Proposed flow:480 gpd Current permitted flow:480 gpd 2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system?® Yes or ❑ No If no, explain: 3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NiA If no, please explain: 4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NiA If no, please explain: 5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N."A If no, please explain: . _. FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 page I of 5 6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N:`A If no, please explain: _ _ 7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. 8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N A If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: 9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N'A If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B) Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme: 10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: 11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS 1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N- A ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #: 2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: Description of existing facilities: Proposed flow: Current permitted flow: Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership, etc.) 3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) maintained appropriately and adequately assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: 4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, please explain: 5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: 6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: . 7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ®N'A If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: 8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ❑ No If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. 9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: 10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N.-'A If no, please explain: FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 5 11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NIA If no, please complete the following ex and table if necessary): Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude I II U 1 II u I 11 15 1 if 7 I II O 1 IF 0 I f1 8 I f1 U 1 IF O 1 IF 12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable. 13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, please explain: 14. Check all that apply: ® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC ❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answericomments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.) If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place? Have all compliance datesr"conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N. A If no, please explain: 15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? ❑ Yes ® No T N:-A If yes, please explain: 16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: 17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance, renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, please explain: 2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an additional information request: Reason 3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued: Condition Reason 4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued: 5. Recommendation: 6. Reason ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office ❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information ❑D Signature of report preparer: Signature of regional supervis Date: ;le I.'_Zy FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 5 V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 5 ROY COOPER cm'vrr. or ELIZABETH S. BISER secrerue y RICHARD E. ROGERS. IR. (A ec ror KLNNETH G. AND TONYA L. PAGL 601 VIRGIL ROAD DURHAM, NORTII CAROLINA 27703 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Page: NORTH CAROUNA Environmental Quality January 12, 2023 Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No. WQ0002653 601 Virgil Rd. SFR Single -Family Residence Wastewater Irrigation System Durham County The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges receipt of your permit application and supporting documentation received on January 11, 2023. Your application package has been assigned the number listed above, and the primary reviewer is Cord Anthony. Central and Raleigh Regional Office staff will perform a detailed review of the provided application, and may contact you with a request for additional information. To ensure maximum efficiency in processing permit applications, the Division of Water Resources requests your assistance in providing a timely and complete response to any additional information requests. If you have any questions, please contact Cord Anthony at cord.anthony@ncdenr.gov_ Sincerely, Nathaniel D. Thornburg, Branch Chief — Division of Water Resources cc; Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (Electronic Copy) Laserfiche File (Electronic Copy) No Ili Carolina Department of Ern°ir0mmF�nla1 oti4lity I DsviSian (A'4 `au•r iiesot <vs 512 No- di tialishur} S11C0 I4,17 hlaN Servi. a Certivr I Rileigh, Nnnfi Carolina 176gq 1617 ROY COOPER Covernor- ELIZABETH S. BISER secr-efoly RICHARD E. ROGERS. JR. Vireclor Kenneth and Tonya Page 601 Virgil Road Durham N.C. 27703-8809 NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality February 22, 2023 Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Single Family Wastewater Treatment System Non -Discharge Permit # WQ0002653 Facility: 601 Virgil Road SFR Durham County Dear Mr. and Mrs. Page, On February 6, 2023, Curtis Tyree, from the Raleigh Regional Office visited your single-family residence (SFR) wastewater treatment system to evaluate compliance with the subject Non - Discharge Permit WQ0002653. Mrs. Page's assistance during the inspection was greatly appreciated. Our records indicate the treatment system consists of a 1,200 gallon baffled septic tank; a distribution box; dual 210 square foot (ft2) subsurface sand filters; a tablet chlorinator; a chlorine contact tank; a 1,200 gallon storage tank; a 1,200 gallon pump tank with a field dosing pump and audio/visual high water alarm; a 0.35 acre spray irrigation area; and all associated piping, valves, controls, and appurtenances. Non -Discharge Permit WQ0002653 authorizes the continued operation up to 480 gallons per day (gpd). The authorized irrigation is in accordance with the effluent limits and monitoring requirements established within the non -discharge permit. The items below show what conditions were noted at your facility: Findings during the inspection were as follows: L Treatment system operation; The wastewater treatment system shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so there is no discharge to surface waters, nor any contravention of groundwater or surface water standards. At the time of this inspection, the facility appears to be effectively maintained. There were no signs of runoff or ponding in the irrigation field. Mrs. Page informed me that her son helps her with the up -keep and maintenance of the system and spray field. lt�:�Dff North Carolina Department ol'Environmental Quality I Division or Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office 1 3&t10 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 919.791.4200 2. Pumping the septic tank: You are required to inspect the septic tank at least once a year to determine if solids must be removed or if other maintenance is necessary. Septic tanks should be pumped out every five years or when the solids level is found to be more than 1.3 of the liquid depth in the septic tank compartment, whichever is greater. A pumping company can check the status periodically and determine when pumping is required. Mrs Page informed me that Scotty's septic service pumped their septic tank out in early 2020. 3. Chlorine tablets in the chlorinator, The permittee is to inspect the tablet chlorinator weekly to insure there is an adequate supply of chlorine tablets for continuous and proper operation. At the time of the inspection, the chlorinator had an adequate amount of chlorine tablets and the correct type of chlorine tablets were being used. 4. Proper Operation and maintenance: The system shall be inspected monthly to make certain of the proper operation of the spray heads, that the system is free of leaks, that the vegetative growth allows a proper spray pattern, that the soil is assimilating the disposed treated wastewater with no surface run off, and that no objectional odors are being generated. Any visible signs of a malfunctioning system shall be documented, and steps taken to correct the problem. On the day of this inspection, the spray field appeared to be assimilating the waste and no ponding/runoff was observed. The pumps and audible/visual alarms were working properly, and the system looked to be well maintained 5. Field conditions: Public access to the irrigation sites and wastewater treatment facilities shall be prohibited. Fencing shall be provided to prevent access to the irrigation site. The irrigation field was well maintained, and no leaks or broken lines were found. The fencing was more than adequate, and the system was in good working order. Non -discharge Permit WQ0002653 requires the permittee pay the annual fee within 30 days after being billed by the division, and that the permittee must apply for a permit renewal 180 days prior to the expiration of the permit. There are no overdue fees for the subject permit. Please continue to periodically inspect the wastewater treatment facility in accordance with your Operation and Maintenance agreement to ensure the treatment components are always maintained and in good operating order. You are also reminded to maintain associated maintenance records (permit required inspection log) onsite for a minimum of five years and available for inspection. If you have questions or comments about this inspection or the requirements to take corrective action (if applicable), then please contact Curtis Tyree at 919-791-4239. North Carolina Department of E m irontnenlal Quahly I IN% iston or Water Resources D E � Raleigh Regional Office 1 ;800 Barren Drive I Raleigh, Norlh Carolina 27609 r�iry � �►/ M 791,4200 Sincerely, e7 z4x-- Vanessa E. Manuel, Assistant Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Raleigh Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ Attachment Cc: Laserfiche North Carolina Department or$nvironmental Quality I Division orWiter Resources Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barren Drive I Raleigh. Noah Carolina 27009 Tirai[xl A I�n�rH i{ph� 919.791.4200 Compliance Inspection Report Permit: WQ0002653 Effective: 03/01/18 Expiration: 02/28/23 Owner: Kenneth G Page SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: 601 Virgil Rd. SFR County: Durham 601 Virgil Rd Region: Raleigh Durham NC 277038809 Contact Person: Kenneth G Page Title: Phone: Directions to Facility: From Raleigh take US 70W -2.3mi past Brier Creek Pkwy turn R, lake Leesville Rd -2.5mi turn L, take Carpenter Pond Rd -0.8mi turn L, take Virgil Rd-1.8mi, the driveway is on the Rt System Classifications: Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 02/0612023 Entry Time 03:30PM Exit Time: 04:10PM Primary Inspector: Curtis R Tyree Phone: 919-791-4239 Secondary Inspector(s): Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Single -Family Residence Wastewater Irrigation Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Question Areas: Miscellaneous Questions Permit Status Septic Tank Sand Filter/Treatment Pods Pump Tank Drip or Irrigation General (See attachment summary) Page 1 of 4 Permit: WQ0002653 Owner - Facility: Kenneth G Page Inspection Date: 02106/2023 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: See attached inspection report. The system is working according to design. Page 2 of 4 Permit: WQ0002653 Owner - Facility. Kenneth G Page Inspection Date: 02/06/2023 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Permit Status Yes No NA NE # Is the current resident in the home the Permittee? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # if not, does the resident rent from the Permittee? ❑ ❑ E ❑ Change of Ownership form needed? (Mail the form with the inspection letter) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ # Is there an inspection and maintenance agreement with a contractor? ❑ M ❑ ❑ If YES, who is the contractor (include contact info)? Comment: The permittee performs the maintenance as needed Septic Tank Yes No NA NE *** The septic tank and filters should be checked annually and pumped/cleaned as needed. **' Is all wastewater from the home connected to the septic tank? M ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the permittee/resident know where the septic tank is located? 0000 Has the septic tank been pumped in the last 5 years? N ❑ ❑ ❑ If YES, describe if known and proof (include date pumped): Scotty's septic tank service pumped the tank out and cleaned the effluent filter in early 2020. Mr. and Mrs. Page are the only ones staying in the residence so the tank doesn't need pumped out very often but they check it once a year as required. # Does the septic tank have an EFFLUENT FILTER or SANITARY T? M000 If FILTER, when was the filter cleaned and by who? Scotty's septic tank service Comment: Sand Filter/Treatment Pods Yes No NA NE *** Accessible sand filter surfaces shall be raked/leveled every 6 months and vegetative growth shall be removed manually. *** # Is system something other than a sand filter? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ # If YES, what kind? (examples - Peat, Textile or brand name - Advantex, etc.) # Does the permittee know where the sandflter is located? 0000 Does the sandfiiter require maintenance? ❑ N ❑ ❑ If maintenace is required, explain: Comment: The sand filters appear to be working properly at this time. Pump Tank Yes No NA NE *** All pump and alarm sytems shall be inspected monthly. (Non -Discharge) *** Is the pump working? 0000 Is the audible and visual high water alarm operational? N ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the permittee know how to check the pump & high water alarm? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Last functional test: Weekly Comment: Page 3 of 4 Permit: W00002653 Owner - Facility: Kenneth G Page Inspection Date: 02MI2023 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Drip or Irrigation Yes No NA NE `** Irrigation sysetm shall be inspected monthly to ensure system is free of leaks and equipment Is operating as designed. *** # Type of system (DRIP or IRRIGATION): # If IRRIGATION, number of sprinkler heads: Are buffers and setbacks adequate? Is the site free of ponding and runoff? Does the application equipment appear to be working properly? Is there a minimum two wire fence surrounding the ent.re .rrigation area? Comment: The spray field is in good shape General # Are the treatment units locked and/or secured? # Has resident had any sewage problems? If YES, explain: Does the system match the permit description? If NO, explain: Is the system compliant? Is the system failing? (If yes, take pictures if possible) If system is failing, describe any exposures to people/animals or environmental risks. Comment: The system is working as designed. Spray 4 Yes No NA NE ■❑❑❑ ❑■❑❑ Page 4 of 4