NC0086029_Issuance of Permit_20011220

SOF \1411790
Michael F.Easley
Governor
\� (� VA William G. Ross,Jr..Secretary
Uj r NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
H Gregory J.Thorpe,Ph.D.,Acting Director
-C" Division of Water Quality
December 20, 2001
Mr. Jerry Drye, President
Trinity American Corp.
PO Box 4529
High Point, North Carolina 27263
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NC0086029
Trinity American Corp.
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Drye:
Division staff have reviewed and approved your application for an NPDES discharge permit.
Accordingly, the Division is forwarding the subject NPDES permit. This permit is issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
The following items appear in this FINAL permit:
• Change in the chronic toxicity sample type from composite to grab, based on the fact that
the treated effluent is not discharged continuously.
• Addition of a monthly average flow limit of 0.072 MGD, based on the treatment plant design
capacity.
• Please note that the updated toxicity test language includes specific procedures to be
followed in case of a toxicity test failure, including follow-up monthly multiple
concentration testing.
• Please note that this facility discharges to Caraway Creek, which provides habitat for
several sensitive freshwater mussels. Therefore, continued compliance with permit limits is
critical. This NPDES permit requires the permittee to take all reasonable steps to mitigate
any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely
affecting human health or the environment (refer to Part II, Section B.2, Duty to Mitigate).
In addition, the permittee is required to at all times properly operate and maintain the
groundwater remediation system (refer to Part II, Section C.2, Proper Operation and
Maintenance).
• Change the permit expiration date to 1/31/04.
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within
thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written
petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-
6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. Part
II, E.4. addresses the requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of
this discharge. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the
permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may
N.C.Division of Water Quality/NPDES Unit Phone:[phone]
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 fax:[phone]
Internet:h2o.enr.state.nc.us DENR Customer Service Center. 1 800 623-7748

• C�g6 Cominei1 117
I (1
i . t
CD
opir
e, N \ Otifitf
oo
CD
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission : ' -
Charles R.Fullwood,Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Belnick, NPDES Unit
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Danielle R. Pender, Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 25 October 2001
SUBJECT: Proposed Permit Renewal for Trinity American Corporation,Randolph County
NPDES Permit No. NC0086029
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the
subject application for impacts to fish and wildlife. Our comments are provided in accordance
with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General
Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Trinity American Corporation has submitted a request for a permit renewal to discharge
0.072 MGD of treated groundwater to Caraway Creek in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. The
groundwater contains several toxic organic solvents and will be treated utilizing air stripping and
carbon filters. The facility discharges to an onsite pond, which overflows into an unnamed
tributary of Caraway Creek. Monthly effluent data for the past 18 months have shown no
detection for the four monitored solvents and quarterly chronic toxicity test results have passed
12 of 12 events.
As we indicated in earlier comments on this permit (Anderson, 29 September 1997),
Caraway Creek provides habitat for several freshwater mussels. Species known to occur in this
stream include the federal species of concern and state threatened, brook floater(Alasmidonta
varicosa) and Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), the federal species of concern and state
special concern, Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana), the state threatened, creeper
(Strophitus undulatus), the significantly rare, Eastern creekshell (Villosa delumbis) and notched
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center• Raleigh,NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext.281 • Fax: [phone]

•
Page 2
25 October 2001
Trinity American Corporation
NPDES No.NC0086029
rainbow(Villosa constricta). In addition, another sensitive mussel species, Eastern elliptio
(Elliptio complanata)has been found in this creek.
Mussels are filter feeders and can bioaccumulate toxic substances. We would not expect
groundwater discharge that has been passed through activated carbon filters to adversely impact
the aquatic habitat of Caraway Creek. However, any malfunction in the treatment system that
would allow toxic substances to pass downstream could have significant adverse impacts to
threatened and rare species.
We offer the following comments and recommendations to reduce impacts to fish and
wildlife resources and in particular to listed species.
1. We are pleased that the applicant has routinely passed toxicity tests. However, we
continue to request that the applicant cease discharge upon any single violation of a water
quality standard or the failure of a single toxicity test and to relocate the discharge out of
Caraway Creek.
2. Notify our office of violations of any water quality standard by this applicant.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this permit notice and your efforts to help
protect this important habitat in Caraway Creek. If we can be of further assistance,please
contact our office at(919) 528-9886.
cc: Tom Augspurger,USFWS
E-mail: Stephen Hall,NHP

fetinithe-f
GeoScix : Czovnii4tAti44-6
LkhnaIov9 ?o A.
V"Practical Engineering&
Environmental Solutions"
2050 Northpoint Drive•Suite A•Winston-Salem, NC 27106
October 23, 2001 Phone: [phone]• Fax: [phone] ,
e-mail: [e-mail]
Mr. Tom Belnick o
North Carolina Division of Water Quality o a co
NPDES Unit i cr
ssi
Lei cv
1617 Mail Service Center i t -
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Wo
E oa
Subject: NPDES Draft Permit Comments
Permit No. NC0086029
Trinity American Corporation
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Belnick:
On behalf of Trinity American Corporation, Geoscience and Technology is submitting the
following comments in response to the Subject Draft NPDES Permit:
Permit Section A (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS.
It is requested that the quarterly chronic toxicity monitoring be collected as a grab
sample, rather than as a composite sample. The groundwater recovery wells that are the
source of the treated effluent discharge do not pump continuously. Rather they pump in a
random configuration based on groundwater drawdown and recovery levels. The
treatment system operates as a closed system, with access via spigots for system
monitoring purposes. The discharge pipe to the fire protection pond is under water.
WSRO DWQ personnel have confirmed these conditions through an on site evaluation
(April 2001), and have concurred that grab sampling is the only available option for this
system. These grab samples are representative of the discharge.
Also, please note that the effluent sample collection point has changed from the pond overflow
discharge pipe to the effluent directly from the groundwater treatment system. Permission to
modify this sampling location was obtained from the WSRO. The change was requested in order
to avoid impact from a heating oil release that occurred in the immediate vicinity of the previous
discharge point.

._
. Mr. Tom Belnick
October 23, 2001
Page 2
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. I may be reached at [phone]
if you have any questions or require additional information regarding these comments.
With best regards,
GESOCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, P.A.
Zw44G:41:41)Th
Brenda J. Smith,P.G.
Principal Scientist
Cc: Cory Basinger,WSRO DWQ
Mr. John Hailey

•
•
NCDENR / DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
Trinity American Corporation
NPDES No. NC0086029
Facility Information
(1.) Facility Name: Trinity American Corp. WWTP
(2.) Permitted Flow: 0.072 MGD (6.) County: Randolph
(3.) Facility Class: I (7.) Regional Office: Winston-Salem
(4.) Facility Status: Existing (8.) USGS Topo Quad: D19SW
(5.) Permit Status: Renewal (9) USGS Topo Site: Glenola, NC
Stream Characteristics
(1.) Receiving Stream: UT Caraway Creek
(2.) Subbasin: 030709 (8.) Drainage Area (mi2): NA
(3.) Index No.: 13-2-3 (9.) Summer 7Q10 (cfs) 0
(4.) Stream Class: C (10.) Winter 7Q10 (cfs): NA
(5.) 303(d) Listed: NO (11.) 30Q2 (cfs): 0
(6.) 305(b) Status: (12.) Average Flow(cfs): NA
(7.) Use Support: (13.) IWC (%): 100%
Conditions Incorporated into Permit Renewal
Proposed Conditions Parameters Affected Basis for Condition(s)
The previous permit Discharge Location The discharge to Caraway
incorrectly located the Creek is located in Subbasin
discharge in Subbasin 030709 within the Yadkin Pee
030608 within the Cape Fear Dee River Basin.
River Basin.
Addition of monthly average Effluent- Flow The design flow of the
flow limit. treatment system is 0.072
MGD.
Update chronic toxicity Effluent- Chronic Toxicity Toxicity language was
testing language. updated in 1999.
Change permit expiration Expiration Date Per basin renewal schedule
date to 1/31/04. for Yadkin River Basin.

NPDES PERMIT FACT SHEET Trinity American Corporation
Page 2 NPDES No. NC0086029
PROJECT NOTES
Snmmarq
• This is a minor permit renewal for an existing 0.072 MGD groundwater treatment system
utilizing air stripping and carbon filters to remove solvent contaminants prior to surface
water discharge. The treatment system is fairly new, being originally permitted in
December 1997. Monthly effluent data for the past 18 months (1/00-6/01) have shown no
detections (all <1 ug/1) for the four monitored solvents. In addition, quarterly chronic
toxicity test results have passed 12 of 12 events. Thus, effluent data shows that the
treatment system is performing satisfactorily, and not expected to adversely impact the
aquatic habitat.
• The facility discharges to an onsite fire protection pond which overflows to an unnamed
tributary to Caraway Creek in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin (Note: the previous permit
incorrectly identified the basin as the Cape Fear). The receiving stream is considered zero-
flow, is not 303(d) listed, and has no specific management strategies. During the last
permit cycle, the NC WRC noted that Caraway Creek provides habitat for several freshwater
mussels, which are state-listed threatened, special concern, or significantly rare.
• A monthly average flow limit of 0.072 MGD has been inserted in this draft permit, based on
the design capacity of the treatment system. The facility's actual discharge has been
averaging 0.018 MGD.
• The permittee submitted their NPDES permit renewal application (Short Form C-GW) on
10/16/00. The current permit expired on 8/31/01. NPDES recommends renewal of the
current permit with the changes noted above.
Page 2
Version:September 13,2001

NPDES PERMIT FACT SHEET Trinity American Corporation
Page 3 NPDES No. NC0086029
Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance
Draft Permit to Public Notice: 09/26/01
Permit Scheduled to Issue: 11/13/01
State Contact
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached
permit, please contact Tom Belnick at [phone], extension 543.
Copies of the following are attached to provide further information on the permit
development:
• Draft Permit
0 9-13-o
NPDES Recommendation by: Signature Date
Regional Office Comments
04,44, 14,4 ." 1,4z 72-4,_1070‘74L- jie',41-44
e...07.44-e-[-Sst 6vcS
ge,rattoter , )14y
Regional Recommendation v` , / / f .2e1
Signature Date
Reviewed and accepted by:
Regional Supervisor:
Signature Date
NPDES Unit Supervisor:
Signature Date
Page 3
Version:September 13,2001

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self-Monitoring Summary August 16,2001 '
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Trausportstl..,NC Dept of Pam chi km:13% 1997 - Ps - - Pass - - Par - - Pass - •
NC0029190A01 Begin:12/1/1999 Frequency:Q P/F Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 1989 - Ps - - Pass - - Ps - - Pass -
Cormty Starry Region:WSRO Subbase':YADO3 1999 - Pass - - NRM - - H - - Pass -
PF:0.030 Special 2000 - Psis - - et - Pan Pus - - Pro -
1Q10:0.3 IWC(%):13 Order: 2001 - Pass - - Pots -
Triad Terminal Ce. Pam 241r LCSO ac manic cpu fihd(grab) 1997 >100 - - - - - - - - - - -
NC0042501/001 Begic8/1/1996 Frequency:5 OWD/A NonCornp: 1999 - - >100 - - - - - - - - -
Cohnty:Guilford Region:WSRO Stdtbasin:CPF08 1999 >100 - - - - - - - - - - -
PF:VAR Amid 2000 >100 - - - - - - - - - - -
1Q10:0.0 IWC(%):100 Order: 2001 - - - - - -
Triad Terminal CeJN1 Pam:24hr LC50 se moot epos fthd(grab) 1997 - - - - >100 - >100 - - - >100 -
NC0049204/001 Begin:7/1/1999 Frequency:A NonComp: 1999 - >100 - >100 - - - - - - - -
Camty:Johnston Region:RRO Subbum:NEU02 1999 >100 - - - - - - - - - - -
PF:NA Spa1d 2000 - >100 - - - - >100 - - - - -
1Q10:0.0 IWC(%):100 Order: 2001 - - - - - -
TriMly Americas Corporation Pam the lint 90% 1997 - - - - - - - - - - - -
NC0086029N01 Begia:1/1/1998 Frequency:Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Singlc 1996 - - - N - - Pas - - Pass -
County:Randolph Region:WSRO Subbuin:CPFO1 1999 Pass - - Ps - - Pa - I ns - - Peas - - i 2 ! .-
PF:0.072 Special 2000 pus - - Ps - - Pass - - Pass - -
7Q10:0 IWC(%):IOO Order 2001 Pass - - Ps - -
Try WWTP Perm dr her 79%;if pf 12MGD dr lin 84% 1997 Ps - - Ps' - - FM Pass - Pass - -
NC0028916N01 Begin:l/I2001 Frequency:Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Single 1999 Pass - - FM FM,Fa1K - Pass - - Pass - -
County:Montgomery Region:FRO Subbasm:YADIS 1999 Ps - - Ps - - Ps - - Pass - -
PF:0.84 Special 2000 8t - - Ps - - Pass - - Ps - -
1Q10:035 IWC(%):79 Order. 2001 Ps - - Ps - -
Tryee W WTP Pam dr lin:37% 1997 - - Fall Ps - Ps - - Pus - - Ps
NC0021601/001 Begin:4/1/1999 Frequency:Q P/F + Mar Jon Sep Dec + NonComp:Single 1998 - - Pass - - Pas - - Pass - - Pass
County.Polk Region:ARO Subbaein:BRD06 1999 - - Ps - - FM Pass - Fall >74 45.1 Ps
PF: 1.5 Special 2000 - - Ps - - Ps - - Pass - - Fa
1Q10:4.00 IWC(Y.)37.0 Order: 2001 40.8 >74 Ps - - Ps
Trckaaetgee WSA WWI? PERM CHR LIM:1.4% 1' 1997 - Pus - - Pass - - Ps - - Pass -
NC0039578/001 Begin:5/1/1998 Frequency:Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 1998 - Pass - - Pass - - Pus - - Ps -
County Jackson Region:ARO Subbado:LTN02 1990 - Pass - - Ps - - Pass - - Pas -
PF: 1.5 Special 2000 - Ps - - Pass - - Ps - - Pass -
1Q10:165.0 IWC(%):138 Order 2001 - Pass - - Ps -
TYCO Electresies Corp. Pen dr lim:90%.;upon rola.to N.Buffalo Cr.c r lim 8.4% 1997 - - - H - - NR/H - - H - -
NC0085821/001 Begin:9/12000 Frequency:Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Single 1990 H - - H - - H - - H - -
County:Guilford Region:WSRO Subbsm:CPF02 1999 H - - H - - H - - H - -
PF:0.0288 sprees 2000 H - - H - - H - H H - -
7Q10:0 IWC(%):100 Order: 2001 H - - H - -
Tyrell Comity(RO)Plat Penn 24hr p/f ac monit 90%mysid(grab) 1997
NC0086924/001 Begin 5/12001 Frequency:Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp: 1999
County:Tyrell Region:WARO Subbase':PASS) 1989
PF:0.216 Special 2000
7Q10:0 IWC(%):100 Order. 2001
Tyson Feeds Ise-Harmony Division Penn chi lin:1.8% 1997 9.89 - - 4.9 4.9 2.3 4.9 4.9 2.3 >7.2 - -
NC0005126/001 Begin:10/1/1999 Frequency:Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Single 1998 5.0 - - >72 - - 2.5 - - >7.2 - -
County.Ireddl Region:MRO Subbort YAHOO 1999 5.1 - - >72 - - >7.2 - - >7.2 - -
PF:0.5 Spacial 2000 Ps - - Ps - - Ps - - NR/Ps - -
1Q10:43 IWC(%):1.8 Oder. 2001 Ps - - Ps - -
UNC-Ckspd HM Power Plat Penn chr lint:90%(New perm 9/1/2001) 1997 30.7.151 73.5,73.51 - >90 - - Per - - Fail,Fail Ps -
NC0025305/001 Begire 5/1/1996 Frequency:Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonCoap:Singk 1996 FM Ps - Ps - - Pas - - FM Ps -
Coary:Orange Region:RRO Subbasic CPF06 1989 Par - - Pass - - Pas - - Fail 58.1 58.1
PF:0.048 Special 2000 FM >100 >100 NR/Fel 74.8 50.1,56.11 Ps - - Ps - - 4
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%):100 Order. 2001 FM =15 >90 H H H ,..1
V
P Pre 1997 Data Available
LEGEND:
\ ....'
PERM-Permit Requiranent LET-Administrative Letter-Target Frequency-Monitoring frequency:Q-Quarterly;M-Monthly;BM-Bimomhly,SA-Semiannually;A-Annually;OWD-Only when discharging;D-Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin-First month required 7Q10-Receiving stream low flow ctiterioo(eV +-quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or NR Months that testing must occur-ex.Jan,Apr,Jul,Oct NonConp-Current Compliance Requirement
PF-Permitted flow(MOD) IWC%-hmream were concartration P/F-Pass/Fail test AC-Acute CHR-Chronic
Data Notation:f-Fathead Memos,:.-Cuiodaphoia sp.;my-Mycid shrimp;ChV-Chronic value;P-Mortality of staled percentage at highest concentration;at-Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit;lot-Bad teat
Reporting Notation:-•Data not required;NR-Not reported Facility Activity Sura:I-Inactive,N-Newly lesued(To construct);H-Active but not discharging f-More data availabk for month in question;•-ORC signature needed
46

State of North /M/sFr(
Department of Environment rn
• and Natural Resources 4"'• •
Division of Water Quality r-. r
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary `c D p r�
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 26,2000
Mr. Eric Dye
Trinity American Corporation
P.O.Box 4529
High Point,NC 27263
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification
Permit NC0086029
Trinity American Corporation
Randolph County
Dear Mr.Dye:
The Division is beginning the cycle of permit renewals for the Cape Fear river basin. An examination of the Cape
Fear basin plan and the NPDES permit schedule has revealed that the existing expiration dates in Cape Fear NPDES
permits do not coincide with the revised permit expiration dates for the basin. This discrepancy could create unnecessary
delays in the processing of over 200 permit renewals. Accordingly,the Division is changing the permit expiration dates for
NPDES permits in the Cape Fear river basin.
This permit modification changes the expiration date of the subject permit in subbasin 30608 to August 31,2001.
Please find enclosed the revised permit cover page. Insert the new cover page into your permit and discard the old page.
All other terms and conditions contained in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This permit
modification is issued under the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.
In accordance with the modification of the permit expiration date,the new due date for your renewal application is
March 4,2001. Renewal application forms will be sent to you approximately 6-8 weeks in advance of the new due date or
you may download the forms from the NPDES web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES/documents.html. You
will need to download Short Form C-GW. If you have already submitted a permit renewal form,there is no need to
submit any other forms to the Division;the application will be processed during the renewal period for your subbasin.
If any part of this permit modification are unacceptable to you,you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within thirty(30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be a written petition conforming
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes,filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings(6714 Mail
Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made,this decision shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions concerning this permit modification,please contact Natalie Sierra at [phone],
extension 551.
Sincerely,
qvuidet;k_.
Kerr T.Stevens
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office,Water Quality Section
Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone[phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer VisiT us ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES

r •
Permit NC0086029
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Trinity American Corporation
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Trinity American Corporation
5275 Glenola Industrial Drive
Glenola
Randolph County
to receiving waters designated as Caraway Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective November 1, 2000.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2001.
Signed this day October 26, 2000.
Aioc.
urriem
Kerr T. Stevens, irector
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

ler1P141
• DeOSCien
• jjthnao ' '9 P. A.
rtv"Practical Engineering&
Envimnmental Solutions"
2050 Northpoint Drive•Suite A•Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Phone: [phone]•Fax: [phone]
e-mail:[e-mail]
September 21, 2000
Mr. David A. Goodrich
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
NCDENR
1617 Mail Service Center
111 Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
RE: Application for Renewal
t NPDES Permit NC 0086029
Groundwater Remediation
Trinity American Corporation
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
' On behalf of Trinity American Corporation, Geoscience and Technology,P.A. is herein
submitting the Application for Renewal for NPDES Permit NC 0086029 Trinity American
Corporation, Randolph County. Included in the Application Package please find:
1. A completed NPDES Permit Application—Short Form C-GW;
' 2. A USGS topographical map which shows all outfalls;
3. A report of the alternatives to surface water discharge. The information provided in the
original NPDES application for this groundwater remediation system remains applicable at
' this time, and a copy is provided as Appendix 1. Please note that the separate domestic
wastewater discharge, which was discussed in the Marziano&Minier Evaluation of
Wastewater Disposal Alternatives Report for Trinity American Corporation and appended to
the Engineering Proposal for Treated Groundwater, has been permitted as a nondischarge
wastewater drip irrigation system (Permit No. WQ0014756); and
4. A summary of the most recent analytical results. The laboratory report with chain-of
' —custody documentation is provided in Appendix 2. A chart summarizing the effectiveness
of the groundwater remediation system is also provided for your information.
L
' SEP 2 7 20001111
DE lR - WATER QUALITY
pour!r cr. ,. ;.,,ICH

• Mr. David A. Goodrich
I September 21, 2000
Page 2
I This permitted groundwater remediation system operates effectively, and in compliance with the
NPDES permit. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information
regarding this permit renewal application. I may be reached as follows: telephone at(336) 896-
I1300; fax at(336) 896-1020; or e-mail at [e-mail].
With best regards,
IGEOSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, P.A.
I (U2A414 T: laer)1)-)
I Brenda J. Smith,P.G.
Principal Scientist
Cc: Jerry Drye
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1
1 I
COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL
•!, ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS • SCIENTISTS
ENGINEERING PROPOSAL/APPLICATION FOR DISCHARGE
' PERMIT
TREATED GROUNDWATER
I'
1
TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATION
5275 GLENOLA INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
GLENOLA, NORTH CAROLINA
CEI PROJECT NO. 95228
O
CoY
1' JANUARY 1997
•
1
1 _

..11
I . .
eCOOPER ENVIRONMENTAL
' 1 ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS • SCIENTISTS
` January 10, 1997
r•
Mr. Dave Goodrich
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health,
• and Natural Resources
• Division of Water Quality
' Water Quality Section
I P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
I" SUBJECT: NPDES Permit Application
Treated Groundwater
Trinity American Corporation
5275 Glenola Industrial Drive
Glenola, Randolph County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
Cooper Environmental, Inc. on behalf of Trinity American Corporation,
is submitting the original and two (2) copies of a completed application for an
NPDES permit for the discharge of treated groundwater from the subject
facility.
13 Trinity has, by separate application, applied for an NPDES discharge
permit for treated domestic wastewater from the facility. The proposed
discharge point for the treated groundwater is an on-site pond that discharges
2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH • SUITE Q 5101 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA • 28227 WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA • 27104
[phone] • FAX [phone] [phone] • FAX [phone]

VIP
Mr. Dave Goodrich
January 10, 1996
Page 2
Cto an unnamed tributary of Caraway Creek. While the Caraway Creek location
ov is the most practical for the non-oxygen consuming treated groundwater, it is
not considered to be appropriate for the discharge of the treated domestic
rwastewater (15A NCAC 2B .0206(d)(2)). Therefore, discharge to Muddy Creek
G. was proposed for the treated domestic wastewater.
G. Please contact me or Jerry Eplin at (910) 760-6520 if you have any
questions or require additional information with regards to this application.
Sincerely,
CCOOPER NVIRONMENTAL, INC.
CBrenda J. Smith, P.G.
BJS/bmh'
O
enclosure
•
Ccc: Jerry Drye
Charles Case
C, Mau ice Hull w/o enclosure
G.
C..
G

n
I
ENGINEERING PROPOSAL/APPLICATION FOR DISCHARGE PERMIT
r• TREATED GROUNDWATER
TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATION
s• 5275 GLENOLA INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
' GLENOLA, NORTH CAROLINA
CEI PROJECT NUMBER 95228
•I
r•
1
s
JANUARY 1997
REPORT PREPARED BY COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
•
s
' ••pR .... ., Citi
REPORT REVIEWED BY: vIocESS./41,1,*•;•:57..
d� c,) fl 7
s SEAL •
Jerry W. Eplin,t.Ek 2011Mite
N E.
111
0I .. ,,
Cooper Environmental, Inc.
' 5101 Country Club Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104
RS
I

1. INTRODUCTION
The Trinity American Corporation (TAC) facility is located at 5275
Glenola Industrial Drive, Glenola, Randolph County, North Carolina. The
location of the site is shown on a portion of a United States Geological Survey
USGS) 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle map as Figure 1. The North
(USGS)
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) has assigned this site Groundwater Incident Number 3728. The
•
site vicinity is used primarily for rural residential, agricultural, and industrial
purposes.
' 2. BACKGROUND
Four major phases of site assessment activities have been conducted at
the TAC facility. Those phases are:
1. Fuel oil underground storage tank (UST) removal and soil sampling;
2. Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments (ESAs)
' conducted by Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc.;
1 3. A Comprehensive Site Assessment conducted by ENSCI
Environmental, Inc.; and,
1 4. Amendments to the Comprehensive Site Assessment by Cooper
Environmental, Inc. (CEI).
'
The data collected during these investigations indicated that a former
(TPI) solid waste landfill appears to be the source of
Thomasville Products, Inc.Inc• PP
groundwater impact at the site. The parameters of concern are primarily
chlorinated hydrocarbons. Table 1 shows the historical groundwater analytical
data for water samples collected from supply wells nearby the site. Table 2
shows the analytical data for groundwater samples collected from monitoring
wells at the site. Figure 2 is a site map showing the locations of the sampled
wells.
S S

I .
I
In November 1995, a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) was submitted to the
• Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the NCDEHNR. This plan outlined
the remedial strategy for the site and proposed soil and groundwater remedial
alternatives. Correspondence from NCDEHNR dated December 18, 1996
' notified Trinity that the proposed CAP was `considered acceptable' and that
public notice would proceed on December 26, 1996. Implementation of the
CAP is included as a requirement in the Special Order by Consent (SOC) EMC
f #AQ 95-09.
The selected remedial alternative is groundwater extraction followed by
treatment and subsequent discharge to surface waters. An in-situ air sparging
'
system is also proposed for the site to complement the groundwater extraction
remediation system. The purpose of this permit application is to obtain a
' National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for the
' discharge of the treated water from the proposed groundwater extraction and
treatment system.
3. WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION
Table 1 displays the historical analytical results for water samples
collected from supply wells nearby the site. Table 2 shows the analytical data
for groundwater samples collected from monitoring well at the site. Table 3
shows the design influent concentrations for the treatment system as
' calculated based upon worst case well concentrations over the previous 24
month period. Actual influent concentrations are anticipated to be much lower
than the design values. ag The average wastewater flow rate for the system is
approximated as 35 gallons per minute (gpm). A design flow rate for the
' treatment system of 50 gpm was utilized to provide added safety and to
account for instantaneous flow rate fluctuations.
1
2

w
I .
i
4. REMEDIATION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS
I
4.1. Groundwater 1____________ It
Ira dissolved-phase chlorinated hydrocarbons will
Groundwater containing P
i be recovered utilizing seven (7) recovery wells equipped with total fluids
submersible pumps. Six shallow recovery wells, completed to approximately
s
35 feet below ground surface, will be equipped with 1/2 horse power (HP)
I pumps with the capacity topum upto 5 gpm at the expected hydraulic
P
V' supply. well, DW-7, will be used to recover
Ipressures. An existing groundwater at approximately 120 feet below ground surface. This well will be
equipped with a 3/4 horse power (HP) pump
with the capacity to pump up to 10
I
gpm at the expected hydraulic pressures. Each recovery well will have an in-
i line flow meter prior to the treatment system. Design calculations for the
recovery system are included as Appendix A. Figure 3 shows the proposed
Ilocations for the recovery wells at the site.
4.2. Treatment Svstem
I pumped to a treatment system consisting
*_ Recovered groundwater will be
of a transfer tank, a tray aeration unit, and granular activated carbon. Figure
e , 4 shows the conceptual treatment system schematic. The groundwater will be
Ipumped to a transfer tank which will also serve as a flow equalization to From there, the groundwater will bepumped through a particulate filter
Itop of the tray aeration unit. The groundwater will flow by gravity through the
,,,R tray aeration unit. The aeration unit is designed to have an air to water ratio oaf
rat least 89:1 to provide for removal of volatile chlorinated hydrocarbonsv ndor it
stripping. Appendix B contains design calculations provided oundwrtof
of
the proposed aeration unit. From the aeration unit,
the treated gr
will be pumped through carbon to the proposed discharge location. The
3) is a small pond located on the TAC
proposed discharge location (see Figure
r- property which discharge to an unnamed tributary of Caraway Creek.
,: 3

I . .
F4
1
Sampling ports will be provided at strategic points along the treatment
system so that the effectiveness of the remediation system can be monitored as
1
.- needed. Sampling ports will be installed at each recovery well, and before and
after the aeration and carbon units.
The treatment system contains numerous fail-safe measures designed to
protect the environment in the event of an emergency condition. The fail-safe
measures include:
• check valves placed in-line for each recovery well to prevent
•
backflow into the well;
r- . a high-level switch in the transfer tank that prevents overfilling by
shutting off the recovery wells in the event of a high-level condition;
I .
a pressure switch on the tray aeration unit to shut the system down
1 •
in the event of aeration blower failure; and,
• a high-level switch in the tray
aeration unit to shut the system
down in the event of a high-level condition in the tray aeration
1 sump.
5. ALTERNATIVE DISCHARGE OPTIONS
Alternative discharge options for the site were investigated by Marziano
gy Minier, P.A. Consulting Engineers in relation to the facility's sanitary
wastewater. A copy of their report entitled 'Evaluation of Wastewater Disposal
Iendix C. During that
Alternative? dated March 15, 1996 is included as App
evaluation it was found that there is no regional sewer within 2 miles of the site
'
and that subsurface disposal, spray irrigation, and wastewater treatment and
reuse were not viable options. The flow rate utilized for that' evaluationwat s gallons per day. The flow rate anticipated for the ground
2,500
remediation system is 35 gallons per minute, which is equivalent to 50,400
nf
ormation, the only viable discharge option
gallons per day. Based upon this i
1 Ttr4
1

1 .
for the treated groundwater is discharge to surface waters under an NPDES
' permit.
P.
' 6. EVALUATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION ALTERNATIVES
The following sections describe the remedial alternatives considered, and
' the rationale for the technology selected. The sections also detail the
implementation, operation, and life cycle cost estimate for the selected
technology.
' 6.1. Remedial Techniques Considered
CEI considered the following remedial options. A summary of the
111 different remedial options considered and their associated estimated life-cycle
cost is contained in Table 4.
6.1.1. Monitoring Only
' A risk assessment and associated long term monitoring only remedial
option was considered to be inappropriate for this site at this time given the
' concentrations of dissolved halogenated VOCs currently on-site.
6.1.2. Groundwater Withdrawal
CEI considered this technique to be an effective means for providing
hydraulic control over the dissolved plume and removing dissolved phase VOCs
from the subsurface. Treatment options for the pumped water were considered
' on a life-cycle cost basis. A summary of the different ex-situ groundwater
„. treatment options and their associated life-cycle estimated cost is included in
Table 3.
6.1.3. In-situ Air Sparge
This option was considered viable only in combination with groundwater
extraction, since in-situ air sparge does not exert hydraulic control by itself.
T'
I
5

I
6.1.4. In-situ Bioremediation
This option was considered technically feasible for the bioremediation of
dissolved VOCs using indigenous naturally occurring bacteria. The reaction
rate of in-situ bioremediation eliminated this option from further consideration.
Based on the preliminary cost estimates and technical feasibility
considerations of the available technologies, CEI chose to further investigate
the applicability of groundwater extraction and air sparging.
6.2. Pilot Tests
The following sub-sections describe pilot testing of groundwater
extraction and air sparging.
6.2.1. Pump Test
On November 20, 1995, CEI personnel conducted a pump test on
recovery well RW-2. This well was installed on November 17, 1995 by McCall
Brothers of Charlotte, North Carolina under the supervision of CEI personnel.
' RW-2 is constructed of 6-inch diameter PVC well casing to a depth of
approximately 30 feet below grade. The screened interval is constructed of
' 0.020-inch circumslot PVC extending from 10 feet to 30 feet below grade.
Groundwater was removed from RW-2 at the rate of approximately 3.5
gallons per minute for approximately 10 hours. During the pump test, depth
to water measurements were recorded automatically by a datalogger probe
placed in the recovery well and in well EW-1 (see Figure 2). A summary of the
data recorded from the pump test is contained in Appendix D.
6.2.2. Air Sparging Pilot Study
' CEI conducted an in-situ air sparging test at the TAC site on November
16, 1996. Monitoring well EW-1 was selected as the sparge well since the top
of the water table was approximately 8 feet higher than the top of the sand
�• filter pack in that well. CEI forced clean filtered air into EW-1 for
ler
approximately 65 minutes. During the test, depth to water and dissolved
6
r

O
I
oxygen measurements were recorded in wells PZ-1, EW-3, RW-1, VE-1 and
tEW-2 (Figure 2). Air flow delivered and pressure at the wellhead of EW-1 were
f.• also recorded. The results of the test are summarized in Appendix E. Air flow
into the well was initiated at a pressure of approximately 2 pounds per square
inch (PSI) greater than that necessary to remove water from the casing. A
pressure of approximately 15 PSI resulted in an air flow rate of approximately
1.4 cubic feet per minute (CFM). A rise in the water table was observed in the
measured monitoring wells during the test. Dissolved oxygen measurement
• remained relatively constant during the test. CEI estimated the radius of
' influence of the sparge test as approximately 100 feet. The radius of influence
could potentially be increased by deepening the screened interval of the sparing
well and increasing the air flow rate.
1 6.3. Alternative Treatment Techniques
I
CEI investigated the potential use of the following treatment techniques
for the extracted groundwater:
6.3.1. Air Stripping
Air stripping involves the volatilization of contaminants from the
groundwater by any one of several methods of introducing air to the
II` groundwater influent stream. The methods include: counter-current packed
towers, low-profile 'tray' aerators, and diffused aeration tanks. These
volatili'ation methods are applicable to the TAC site. Of these methods, a low-
profile tray aerator provides the most reliable operation under all weather
conditions and is deemed most appropriate for the site.
6.3.2. Ultraviolet Light (UV) and Ozonation
UV and ozonation involve sparging the influent groundwater with ozone
and then exposing the groundwater to ultraviolet light. This combination
treatment results in
oxidation of the organic contaminants. This technique is
not commonly used in North Carolina for the treatment of groundwater because
it 7

I I .
turbidity which interfere
occurring inorganic contaminants and tur ty
of naturally o g
rwith the process. This technique is not considered applicable for the
r• referenced site.
r6.3.3. Ex-situ Bioremediation
iEx-situ bioremediation involves adding bacteria and nutrients to the
groundwater influent stream in a bioreactor to allow the bacteria to break down
the organic contaminants. This technique was not considered applicable for
r• the referenced site because of the potential otential intensive operation and
1 maintenance requirements of the technique and because of the concern about
F- the potential end products of incomplete biological degradation.
r6.3.4. Carbon Adsorption
I
Carbon adsorption involves passing the extracted groundwater througha , beds of activated carbon
which sorb the organic contaminants onto the carbon
Ithus removing them from the wastewater. Carbon adsorption is proposed for
use at the TAC site as a polishing step to the tray aeration process.
r
7. GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM DESIGN
The following subsections describe the design components for the system
1 to be installed at the site.
7.1. Groundwater Withdrawal
Figure
3 shows the proposed location of the recovery wells for the site.
111 CEI proposed the use of 6 shallow recovery wells (RW-1 through RW-6) and
groundwater at the site. Groundwater
deep recovery well (DW-7) to recovery
Irecovery will be by environmental submersible pumps manufactured by
Grundfos Pumps, Inc.
Pipe and pump sizing calculations are contained in
Appendix A. Pump performance curves are contained in Appendix F. Pipe
I
l,' trenches are proposed to be located as shown in Figure 5 and constructed as
Ishown in Figure 6.
t. 8

A
i
7.2. Groundwater Treatment
Groundwater treatment will be by aeration in a low-profile air stripper.
The low profile air stripper selected is the Shallow Tray 2631 or equal. The
idesign parameters for the aeration unit are presented in Table 2. Appendix B
contains the stripper vendor's design calculations. Table 2 shows the proposed
effluent discharge limitations.
1 Based on data from the pump
test on November 20, 1995, CEI
anticipates maximum individual well flow for recovery wells RW-1 through RW-
' 6 to be less than 5 gpm and for DW-7 the estimated flow rate is 10 gpm. The
design flow rate includes additional flow for an added safety factor.
Following treatment in the tray aeration unit, the water will be pumped
through a set of carbon vessels in series. Each individual unit of the series will
contain at least 500 lbs of carbon. The carbon will be utilized as a polishing
step.
7.3. Discharge Of Treated Water
After treatment of the water by the tray aeration unit, the water will be
111 discharged to a pond located on the TAC property (Figure 2). The pond
discharges to
an unnamed tributary of Caraway Creek. This discharge location
} is the closest point suitable for the discharge of a non-oxygen consuming
'
wastewater and will allow for the quickest implementation of groundwater
1 remediation at the site.
tr
8. MONITORING OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
The following sections outline the proposed schedule for monitoring the
performance of the remedial system.
s
I
yr
I
;.r 9

Ara
•
j
i
8.1. Baseline Monitoring
Prior to system start-up,
water level data be collected from each of the
project monitoring wells. Dissolved oxygen and pH levels in the groundwater
' from select wells will be measured and recorded.
' 8.2. System Start-Up and Operation
The groundwater remediation system will be activated. All meter and
'
readingswill be collected and recorded. It is proposed to begin operation
gauge
i of the groundwater extraction system at 50% of the design flow and to increase
the flow rate in a stepwise manner after demonstrating the treatment system
achieves the required level of treatment. Influent samples will also be collected
to document treatment system efficiency and contributions from the various
recovery wells. In addition, water samples will be collected before and after
carbon treatment to verify performance of the carbon treatment unit.
8.3. System Monitoring
During the first month of operation, the system will be inspected on a
weekly basis. Water level data and system gauge and meter readings will be
' collected and recorded. Dissolved oxygen and pH levels in the groundwater will
be measured and recorded in select wells as needed.
Following the first month of operation, the remediation system will be
inspected on a monthly basis. Water level data and system gauge and meter
readings will be recorded during each visit. Routine maintenance will be
performed.
Groundwater samples will be collected on a quarterly basis and analyzed
by EPA Method 8021.
In addition to the monitoring activities described above, treatment
system effluent sampling will be performed in accordance with the NPDES
r. permit to be issued. CEI anticipates the permit to have the limitations shown
' in Table 3.
10

9. GENERAL COMMENTS
111 The information contained in this report represents CEI's professional
• opinions and are based upon the finding of this investigation and the
111 investigations performed by CEI and by former consultants of TAC. These
opinions are arrived in accordance with currently accepted hydrogeologic and
engineering practices at this time and location and no warranties or guarantees
are intended or implied.
Many of the opinions in this report are based upon the work and
statements of others, including but not limited to laboratory reports, previous
environmental investigation reports, and vendor supplied calculations. CEI
assumes this work and these statements to be accurate, but accepts no
responsibility for the quality and any inaccuracies of this work and these
• statements.
•I
vir
I
0
q
I
I
s'r 11

IIIIII:.- 11111111 -4 -- l' _.1 -r res 1 1 IIIII, r' 11111111.. 1111111111'. 001 111117 IIIIIIII' 01111 111111111: 1111111
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANAYLSES-SUPPLY WELLS .
TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATION e
GLENOLA,NORTH CAROLINA
Resuks in ug/L
(Page 1 of 2)
er ti.
i I i i
I
wei Localon Deft fi $ i lli i idid E 5 1111 1 I A 1 I ^ I
NC2L Iliendonle AnyloalMWlodUsed OA 2,000 0.10 700 5.38 7 70 20 2.100 1 NR NA 1000 NA 200 Pit 2.5
Trinity(0W-1) 4128192 x 00L BDL 501. 1.0 SOL 2 001. SOL BDL 61 NA NA 00L SOL 2.0 SDI. S.0
1/7/94 X BDL 004. 801 1.1 00L 0.0 BDL BDL SOL 2.4 NA NA SO4. SOL 1.4 501. SA
3/10194 x 00L SOL 056 1.40 SDI. 0.02 BOL BOL SOL SOL NA NA 00L 504. 1.00 SOL 5.1
1/30195 X 50L 00L 0.7 1.0 501. 4.3 50L SOL NA 33.5 NA NA SOL SOL 0.0 00L 0.5
5/15/95 x SOL 00L BOL SOL 501. 1.7 SOL SOL NA SOL NA NA SOL SOL 504. 504. 2.5
8/14185 X SOL SOL 0.0 0.7 BOL 1.4 501 501. NA SOL NA NA 001. 501 SOL SOL 2.2
(26-47') 10/14/95 X SOL SDI. 804. 501 501. SOL 504. 004. 501. SDI. NA NA 23 sol. 5OL SOL SOL
(4T-685 10/14195 X SOL 50L SDI. 50L SOL 50L SOL 501. 504. 001. NA NA 501. 50L SOL SOL 10
(8W-89') 10/14/96 X SOL 501. BOL 504. 501. SOL SOL SOL 001. 50L NA NA 50L 50L 50L 501. IN.
10130/98 X 41.0 <1.0 41.0 41.0 <1A 3A 41.0 41.0 NA 44.0 NA 4.0 41A '1.0 41.0 41.0 7.0
Carter(DW-4) 3/24/94 x BDL 004. SDI. 50l BDL 504. SDI. 501. 50. 50L NA NA SOL 501 504. 504. 50L
10/8/95 X X 504. 004. 001 SD4. 501. SOL 501. SO4. 004. 504. NA NA NA NA 501. 501. BCC
'Deaton 2(Futcher) 3/25194 X 504. SDI. 004. SOX 501 501. 50L 504 50L 004. NA NA 501. SOL SDI. 001. SOL
(0W-9) 8/30194 x 50L KL BOL BOL 501. SOL BOL SDI. Kt 501. SDI. 50L SDI. SDI. 504. 501. 50L
12/28/94 X X 501. 501. 001 504. 00L 001 BOL SOL SOL SOL SOL SOL SOL 504. SOL SOL SDI.
5124195 X NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 504. NA SOL NA NA 50L SOL NA NA NA
8/24/95 X 501. 00L SOL SOL 50L 504. 504. 00L 501 501. 50L 504. SOL SOL 00L SOL SOL
10/6195 x x SOL SOL 80L SOL 804. 501. SDI. 501. SDI. 504. NA NA 501 SOL 00L NA 501.
3-D(DW-7) 3125184 x 0.0 0.0 BOL 12.1 BDL 105.5 004. SDI. 501. Sol NA NA SOL SOL 02.5 501. 1.5
8/30194 X X 001. 504. SOL 501 50L N 501. 00L 501. 504. NA 501. SOL SOL 130 501. sot.
5124/95 x BDL SOL 1 13 1.7 126 1 50L 504. 501. NA 501 SDI. 1 135 501. 2.0
8/24195 X X SOL NA 0.3 20 0.M 100 1.3 SOL NA 501. NA SOL SDI. SOL 100 0.42 2.8
8/29195 X X 5.57 NA 5.37 24 1.2 M SOL 501. NA SOL NA 504. SOL 501. 110 0.55 24
10/8/95 X X 50L SDI. 1.3 37 SOL 170 NA SOL 501. SOL 501 NA SOL 501 110 50L 2.6
12/2/98 x 41 41 41 15 41 M 41 41 41 44 h 4 41 41 07 2.0 41
,Elkr(DW-3) 3/24/94 X 504. 001 00L 801. SOL SOL 50L 501. 11.3 804. NA 501. SOL SOL 004. SOL 50L
8/30/84 X BOL NA SOL SOL 004. 00 0DL SDI. NA 504. NA NA SOL SOL 130 501. SOL
10/8195 x x 0.1 50L SOL SOL 501. 501. SOL 504. SDI. SOL NA NA SOL SOL 50L 501. BOL
10/29/98 X 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 <1.0 41.0 <1.0 NA 44.0 N1 4.0 (1.0 41.0 (1.0 41.0 0.0
New Dalton(DW-10) 1018/95 x X BOL SOL 00L SDI. SOL 50L 501 BOL SOL 501. NA W. SOL SOL 501. 50L SOL
10/30/98 X 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 NA 4.0 NA 4.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0
10/30196
duplica1e X 410 <1.0 41.0 0.0 410 41.0 410 410 NA 44.0 N11 4.0 0.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0
Niles: 1.)NA•Not Analyzed
2.)NR•Not Recorded
3.)BDL•Below detection limit
4.)NC2L i•North Carolina Administrative Code TRW 15 Subchapter 2 L
5.)Water samples collected prior to October 8,1995,were collected by ENSCI,Inc.,Randolph County H.D.,and/or NCDEHNR.
6.)For the 10/30/96 sampling evert,DW-10 was sampled Instead of DW-7. This sample Is labeled as DW-7 in the analytical report.

IMO... OMr MIMI 1 111111 : 111111`3 MI ' MINI - 111111 ' M r •, MINI" MIN' OM 1 SIMI:"' 11111: SIM 1 MIMI MEN
•
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANAYLSES-SUPPLY WELLS
TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATION
GLENOLA,NORTH CAROLINA
All Results in ug/L
(Page 2 of 2)
6
6 Location Dab $ g il it i g 5 E 5
I i 5 1
IMO 1 I i
NC2L Standards Analytical Method Used 0.3 2,900 0.16 700 0.36 7 70 29 2,100 6 NR NR 1,000 200 NR 2.6
Halsey(DW-6) 3/24/94 x BDL BOL BDL 801. BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL NA 0.6 BDL BDL BDL BOL
10/6/95 x x 004. BDL BDL BDL BOL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL NA NA BDL BOL BDL BDL
^
Sandy Parris(DW-8) 3/25/94 x BDL BDL 001 BDL BOL BDL BDL 001 BDL BDL NA NA BDL BDL BDL BDL
8/30/94 X 804. BOL 004. 804. BOL BOL BDL BOL BDL 801. NA NA 804. BDL BDL BDL
12/28/94 X X BDL BDL BOL BDL 801. BDL 001. BDL BOL BDL BDL BOL BDL BOL BDL BDL
10/8/95 x x 801. BDL 801. 801. BDL 801 BOL 804. BDL 801. NA NA BDL BDL BOL BDL
Resor(DW-5) 3/24/94 x 804. BDL 804. BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 004. BDL NA NA 804. BDL BDL BDL
10/6/95 x x BOL BDL 801. 004. BDL BDL BDL 804. BOL BDL NA NA BOL BOL BDL 004.
Stricldand 8/31/95 x NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 001 NA NA NA NA 801. NA NA NA
Trailer Well(DW-2) 3/10/94 x BDL BDL Bol 804 BDL 001. BDL 001. BDl 001 NA NA BOl BOL BDL BOL
10/8/95 x x BOL BDL 804. BDL BDL 801 Bol BOL BOL BDL NA NA BOL BDL BDL MX,
Notes: 1.)NA=Not Analyzed
2.)NR=Not Recorded
3.)BDL=Below detection limit
4.)NC2L=North Carolina Administrative Code Title 15 Subchapter 2 L
5.)Water samples collected prior to October 6, 1995,were collected by ENSCI,Inc.,Randolph County H.D.,and/or NCDEHNR.

-1 111111 1111114 11111114 _11111111 - SIB 1S "'!iiBL am , r r- ..:, -, am, awl me :
Il
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYSES-MONITORING WELLS
TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATION
GLENOLA,NORTH CAROLINA •
Results in ug.L
(page 1 of 2)
i
•
1
0 N �{t}5
N N N r9.
h N A i 8 5, T r' r: ' I m $ cLL 6
NCAC Standard AnaMIcal Method 1 -MR 700 NR 140'Nk 0.3 $800-0.19 at 76� 700 0.3C 7 /0 29 Jr NICWR UrJR /0 6.7 1,1. 200 NR 8 0. 1
EW-1 5/11/94 X X 4.1 NA NA BDL NA BDL BDL 510 BDL BDL BDL BDL 20 510 NA BDL BDL NA NA 3.0 NA NA 1.8 BOL 804. 3,200 BDL 2.6 BDL BDL
10/8/85 X X BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 804. 310 BDL BDL BDL 1,000 BDL 230 BDL BOL 8131. NA NA BOL 804. BDL BOL 470 BDL 1,800 804. BDL BDL 804.
102998 X <50 NA NA <50 NA NA <50 400 <50 <50 <50 1,500 d0 300 <50 <50 NA NA NA 400 NA 450 <50 <50 <50 4,600 <50 <50 <50 <50
EW-2 5/18/84 X X 804. NA NA 810 NA BDL BDL BDL BDL 804. BDL 68 SDI. 9.8 NA BDL BOL NA NA BDL NA NA BDL 804. 8DL 4.6 BDL 8M. 801. BDL
1018195 X X BDL BDL BDL 801. BDL BDL BDL 100 804. BDL 804. 17 1.2 1.0 8131. BDL BOL NA NA BDL 801. SOL BDL 1.4 BDL 801. BDL 801. 2.0 801
EW-3 6130/94 X X 5.2 NA NA 804. NA BDL BDL 680 2.1 BDL SDI. 090 25 380 NA 2 804. NA NA 7.4 NA NA 1.7 904. 2.4 1300 1.5 4.1 19 6
10/6/85 X X 2.7 801. BDL BDL 801. BDL BDL BDL 1.6 480 801. 1,700 23 400 76 801. BDL NA NA 5.7 BDL 9131. 1.9 1.1 BDL 2,400 1.8 3.5 15 SOL
102896 X <100 NA NA <100 NA NA <100 300 <100 <100 <IOC 1,100 <100 300 <100 <100 NA NA NA <400 NA <I00 <100<100 <100 3000 <100 <100 <100 <100
`
EW-4 34515 X X BDL NA NA 604. NA BDL BDL 1.2 BDL 1.3 BDL 804. DL 36 BNA SDI. BM.BNA NA 801. NA NA 1 BDL BDL 150 801. BDL BDL 1.4
10/8185 X X BDL BDL BDL BDL BOL 804. 1.1 1.2 BOL BDL BOL 43 BDL N BDL BDL BDL NA NA 3 BDL BDL BOL 1.3 ED. 150 BDL 3.0 BDL 801.
10129106 X <2 NA NA <2 NA NA <2 300 <2 <2 4 44 <2 110 4 4 NA NA NA <8 NA <10 <2 <2 <2 180 4 4 <2 4
EW-5 10/85 1 `
X BDL BDL NA BOL BDL BOL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BOL BDL BOL BDL BOL BDL NA NA BDL NA NA 801. SDI. 9131. BOL BOL 801. BDL BDL
10/8/95 X X SOL 804. SOL BDL BCL SOL BDL BDL BDL 8DL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL NA NA 2.7 BDL SOL 804. BOL 904. BDL BDL 8DL BDL MX
102996 X <1.0 NA NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA NA NA 4.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
EW-6 1095 X BOL BDL NA BDL SDI. BDL SOL BDL SOL BDL BDL SOL 8DL BDL SOL 801. BDL NA NA 801 NA NA BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BOL BDL BDL
10/895 X X BDL BDL BDL BDL SDI. BDL BDL BOL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL SDI. BDL 604. NA NA 2.7 BDL SOL BOL 804. 804. BDL BDL BDL BOL BDL
102996 X <1.0 NA NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA NA; NA 44.0 NA <5.0 4.0 <1.0 <1.0 4.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
MW.1 1/89DL 4 X X X BNA BDL BDL NA BDL SOL 801. BOL BDL SDI. BOL 13131. BDL NA SOL SOL NA BDL,001. NA SOL BDL BDL BDL BOL SOL 904. BDL SOL
34978 X X Kt NA NA BDL NA BOL 11 BOL BOL BDL BOL BDL 1.4 BOL NA SOL SOL NA NA BDL NA NA BM BDL BOL BOL BDL BOL BOL BDL
10/30/96 X <1.0 NA NA <1.0 NA NA 17.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 4.0 NA NA NA <4.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
MW-2 1/794 X X BOL NA NA `BDL NA BDL 1.4 BDL BOL BDL BDL 3.8 BDL 66.1 BDL BOL BDL NA NA BOL NA NA 2.3 BOL BDL 11.5 BDL 2.6 BOI. BDL
3/1094 X X 801. NA NA BDL NA BDL MX BOL BDL BDL BDL 2.5 BDL 52.7 BOL BDL BDL NA NA BDL NA NA 1.0 804. BDL 12.0 BOL BDL BDL BDL
109195 X X SDI. 9131. BDL BDL 2.8 1301. BOL BOL BDL BDL MX 804. BOL 37 6.4 BDL 804. NA NA BDL 804. 801. 2.5 1.1 BOL BOL BOL IS SDI BDL
MW-3 11694 X X X 8131. NA BDL BDL NA BDL 11.2 813L 1.5 BOL BDL BDL 81131. BDL NA BOL BDL NA SDI. 801. NA BOL BOL BDL BDL SOL BCH. 1.0 BDL BDL
12494 X X 8131 NA NA BDL NA BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 604. BDL BM BDL BDL BDL 3.7 NA NA BDL NA NA BDL BDL SDI MX BDL BDL BDL BDL
3/1094 X X MX NA NA 804. NA BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 801 SOL BDL BDL NA NA SOL NA NA BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BOL
10495 X X BDL NA NA BDL NA BDL SOL 4.5 BDL BOL 8DL BOL BDL BDL BDL BOL 0.1 NA NA BDL NA NA BOL 804. BDL BDL BDL 601. SOL BOL
10/3096 X <1.0 NA NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA NA NA <4.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1)NA=Not Analyzed
2)BDL=Below Detection Limit
3)Results in/B/L
4)Samples Collected prior to 10/8/95 by ENSCI,Inc.
5)Bolded items exceed 2L standards

i 1111111.14, 11111111 111111114 MPS; 111111113 ape.1 iime-, me I am I sus- spa I as-- IIIIIII.. Ill] 1111111, 1111111/ 11111111i MIN- 1111111
TABLE 2 •
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYSES-MONITORING WELLS
TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATION
OLENOLA,NORTH CAROLINA
Results in ug.L
(page 2 of 2)
8 I I
8I i
i 8
i
Wed ID t Dale $ tel N � Np ei {NCAdard /�naytal tcf ed 1JJRAOLSÔ - DR * Too 'a.z.!. H. t iLittIi4L 000 A) -fire O. S t`s0'
MW-4 952415 X SOL NA SOL SOL NA BOL BOL BDL BOL 504. 901. BIl SOL BDL NA BDL 501. NA SOL BOL NA BDL 801. SOL BDL SOL BDL SI1. 501. 504.
105195 X X SOL NA NA BOL NA SOL BDL BDL BDL BDL SIL BDL BOL 504. BOL SOL BDL NA NA BDL NA NA SOL BDL BOL BOL BDL BOL BOL BOL
MW-5 1ff44 X X X BDL NA BOL SOL NA SOL BOL BDL 501. 804. 2.5 1.3 BDL BOL 501. SOL 801. NA NA SOL NA BOL SOL BOL BOL BDL BOL BOL BDL BDL
-
MW4 01256 X X 504. NA BOL BDL NA BDL SOL 504. 15 BDL BO1. BDL BOL BOL BOL BOL BDL NA NA BDL NA BDL 501. 001 BDL 504. BDL BOL BOL 501.
105415 X X BOL NA NA BDL NA BOL SDI. 801. BDL BDL BOL BOL 004. SOL SOL BDL BDL NA NA BOL NA NA BDL SOL BDL SOL BOL 801. SOL BDL
105096 X <1.0 NA NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA NA NA 4.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
MW7 9/1245 X X S0L NA BDL SOL NA SDI. 504. BDL BDL SOL SQL BDL BOL 801. BDL SIL BDL NA NA BOL NA BDL BOL BDL BDL 504. SOL SOL BDL BDL
16195 X X BOL NA NA 5a NA SQL SQL BDL BIL BOL BDL BDL BOL BOL 801. SOL BDL NA NA SOL NA NA SOL BOL BDL BDL SOL BOL SDI. BOL
10/2956 X 2.0 NA NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA NA NA 4.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
MWS 911255 X X BOL NA SOL BDL NA SOL BDL 801. BOL BOL 001. 804. BOL BIL SQL BDP. BDL NA NA BDL NA 501. BOL BOL 801. 8131. BDL BDL 801. BDL
105415 X BOL NA NA BOL NA SO4. BDL BOL SOL BOL SOL BOL BOL BOL 5O1. SOL BOL NA NA BOL NA NA SQL SQL 504. 801. BDL BDL MX SOL
MW-9 95256 X X BOL NA 504. BDL NA BDL SOL 801. BDL BOL BDL BDL SOL BDL 801. SOL. BDL NA NA BOL NA SOL B01. BO1. BOL 504. 504. BO4. BDL BOL
10556 X BOL NA NA BD1. NA BOL BDL SOL BDL 801. BDL BQl BDL BOL BDL BOL BDL NA NA BOL NA NA BDL 501 SQL BOL BOL 801. BDL BDL
-
RW-1 16195 X SOL NA NA 504. NA BOL SOL 4.4 50L 501. BDL 21 BDL 4.0 BDL 801. 801 NA NA BOL NA NA 801. 50. SO4. 29 BD4. SIL SOL BDL
102956 X 41.0 NA NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10.0 <1.0 1.0 <1.0 41.0 NA NA NA 4.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11.0 <1.0 41.0 <1.0 <1.0
• ..RW-2 1120195 X BOL SOI. BDL 504. DL BBDL BDL 660 BOL SOL 504. 966 BD4. 19 130 50L 804. SOL SQL 7 SOL SOL BDL 504. BOL 200 BDL 80L BOL BOL
10ons X 4200 NA NA 4200 NA NA 400 1200 400 400 <20C Mee 400 990 1690 400 NA NA NA 400 NA <1000 4200 400 400 14010 400 400 400 400
104956
44eoats 400 NA NA 400 NA NA 400 1200 400 400 400 4219 400 400 1200 400 NA NA NA 400 NA <1000 400 400 400 12000 400 400 400 400
I ,
VS-1 4 X SOL BOL NA SDI. SOL BDL 1
BOL SOL 13 BOL
9550L SOL 50L SOL SOL SIL SOL NA NA BDL NA NA BOL SOL SOL BOL 501. BDL BOL BOL
012415 X X SOL NA BDL 504. NA BDL BDP. BOL BDL BDL SOL BDL SOL BDL 50L BM. 5OL NA NA BDL NA BDL BOL SOL 5OL SOL BOL 501. SOL BDL
10556 X BDL NA BOL BO4. NA S0L 05 BDL BOL 50L BDL 504. SOL SOL BOL SQL BDL NA NA BDL NA BOL BOL BOL SOL SOL BDL SOL BDP. BOL
10/1095 X NA NA SQL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA SOL BOL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
10/2996 X <1.0 NA NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA NA NA 4.0 NA 41.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
VE-2 . 94295 X X SOL NA BDL BDL NA BDL SOL BDL BOL SQL 'BOL BOL SIL BOL BDL SQL 804. NA NA 501. NA BIL sot SOL BDL sot. SQL 5.5 SOL BDL
10555 X SOL NA BOL BOL NA SOL BOL SOL 1.9 BDL BDL BDL SOL BDL SOL SOL SOL NA NA 504. NA BDL BM. SOL 50L SOL BOL BDL BDL BOL
10/30196 X <1.0 NA NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA NA NA 4.0 NA 45.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 3.0 <1.0 <1.0
1)NA=Not Analyzed
2)SOL<Below Detection Unit
3)Results In 1191L
4)Samples Collected prior to 1018195 by ENSCI,Inc.
5)Bolded kerns exceed 21_standards

—M 1111111111 MA —= NM M 1 r.., —1 INV r" 1111111', r' Mel IOW ale: O 1 NM: NIB)
TABLE 3
DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR TREATMENT SYSTEM
TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATION
GLENOLA, NORTH CAROLINA
CEI NO. 95228
Expected Percent Anticipated
Concentration Removal In Effluent
Worst Case Well After 3rd Tray Aeration Groundwater Concentration Proposed Effluent
Contaminant (ug/L) (ug/L) Unit Standard(ug/L) (ug/L) Limitation
1,1,1-TCA 14000 5 99.97 200 <1 Monitor and Report
1,1,2-TCA 2 1 71.25 NR <1 No Limit Proposed
1,1-DCA 4800 7 99.86 700 <1 Monitor and Report
1,1-DCE 600 <1 99.99 0.38 <1 Monitor and Report
1,2-DCA 29 5 81.64 7 <1 Monitor and Report
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2 <1 97.57 75 <1 No Limit Proposed
Benzene 5 <1 99.61 1 <1 No Limit Proposed
c-1,2-DCE 1600 15 99.04 70 <1 Monitor and Report
Carbon Tetrachloride 17 <1 99.99 0.3 <1 Monitor and Report
Chloroform 2 <1 99.71 0.19 <1 Monitor and Report
Chloromethane 480 <1 99.98 NR <1 Monitor and Report
MEK 3 3 13.89 170 <1 No Limit Proposed
Methylene Chloride 7 <1 89.96 5 <1 No Limit Proposed
r
t-1,2-DCE 2 <1 99.04 70 <1 No Limit Proposed
PCE 470 <1 99.64 0.7 <1 Monitor and Report
Toluene 2 <1 96.99 1000 <1 Monitor and Report
TCE 400 <1 99.38 2.8 <1 Monitor and Report
Vinyl Chloride 15 <1 99.96 0.015 <1 Monitor and Report
Xylenes 8 <1 97.65 530 <1 Monitor and Report
Chloroethane 1200 1 99.92 2800 <1 No Limit Proposed
NOTE: Design was based upon worst case single well concentration over the previous 24 month period. Actual influent
concentrations are anticipated as being signifcantly lower.
Utilizing EPA Method 8021,the detection limit for most compounds is 1 ug/L.
Many of the compounds were detected only in a small number of wells and the anticipated influent concentrations
are so low that no effluent limitation was proposed.
Design flow rate: 50 gpm.
Design temperature: 50 degrees F.

I '
Table 4
LIFE-CYCLE COST ESTIMATE OF REMEDIAL OPTIONS
Trinity American Corporation
Glenola, North Carolina
CEI Project No. 95228
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
DURATION LIFE-CYCLE VIABLE
REMEDIAL OPTION CONSIDERED (years) COST ($) OPTION?
IPassive bioremediation 20 200,000 NO
. Pump and treat; carbon treatment;
surface water disposal 7 600,000 YES
Pump and treat; airstripper; carbon
' treatment; surface water disposal 7 456,750 YES
Pump and treat; airstripper; carbon
treatment; reinjection 6 315,000 NO
IPump and haul 7 14,000,000 NO
Pump and treat; air sparge; airstripper;
Icarbon treatment; surface water disposal 5 415,250 YES
1
I
I
I
5
I
I

f;
HALSEY � • J
r:w 6NCBe.
•
i�• T.
I�;i °V • ♦ ' Irl n
111 N
,, .:40 ili s.
s. \ .;; • 2 44
°‘iY \ '
�i
!`fr(8 P.g.j-tic:›4'c
, \
Ii WATER TANK '. \
I \ \
I \
DLMN
RESIDENCE ,•;•• \
is
\
•
- -♦: 4 • \
�s II g. \(.: \\
Ek
u15! 3-D RW-f - \
UPHOLSTERY
I 74-s FENCED0 DOG LOT
QCT
I \
- / - \6\ 75 2
rte
$n i
POND '8
, .41(i 0
___________________I / PUMPHOUSE *
\ 51, A• .1•-7 \ \ �f Va1 \\
YF! 1,1 _��`1 1 1
I + CONCRETE \ p
E 1 PAD 5
`�' J
a 1'
,
El TRINITY FOAM OF CAROIDIA IIII -- __
_�=NVEYOR 8EL7 -_ __
______SEPTIC FIELD I'I
1Q� H mom,
(2.0 ACRESLEASED t I
_:r -
FROM MRS.RAL RICH)
, I
i Y•Vs
, 1
Nom' \_- MRS. H.Rlpl
LEGEND __ l
' YM 1
MONITORING WELL LOCATION COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL
YE-, /
{i• N>• ENGINEERS GEOLOGISTS SCIENTISTS
I j DRINKING WATER WELL LOCATION
SITE MAP
TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATION
52GLENOLA INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
GLENOLA75 , NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT: 95228 SCALE: 1" = 200'
DWG: SW\95156JW FIGURE: 2

MR X11 MN 11111111 OIN1 M"' Mil _i IOW NW —~ Mi' MINI OM MZ MI OM Min
•
•
VAT*TAR `\tj4k
di °Y
a
LOLL .1.1.4 NM-T \
►����
� :� \
E V,-4 ww-0 *
EN-5 77m '0
•
-`, P1-A* �lerDIATION
® SIAIA7110
TN-I le
K-1
3-D Ew-I,
171-7 1 UPHOLSTERY
EM-]
#RW-2
E� .
2-4 o 4:-=7, OL5N-2®
COO lar
APPROXIMATE
"Z-1212I03 LOCATION
--..`J RW-3
•
MUD
APPROMMATS LOCATION OP=arm .1
GROUND MATER RECOVERY NELL POND
1.-11 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
4, PROPOSED RECOYCLY IL PROPOSED IMOCNAIIOL
NE
To.: �, ♦ LOCATION
• APPROXIMATE LOCATION O► f.-...11:
PROPOSED A0 SPARGE'RLL !. . //
K_0
ow. MONITORING NEL LOCATION `.�� a E�9
/ PIIIPIIOUa1
�� MONITORING MULL LOCATION
K-]
M. NONRORINO 41111 LOCATION 7 '��
DRINKING MOTEL+U{A,LOCATION 'L{{L * C COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL
G i; C ENONaELs =Loops =Nuys
...
•,I• y•-•,—....:.. \t.'•; •
rROPao Rtlw-T+1L wCAYIOIn
'., V'l ` tJ,•
,`
r‘,l+ V#:- E* TERM ANOICAN ODRPORATION
•T Y,:1I L%' KYSOLaL1LaNDRTx OLa OUSTII CILALcARaANADRIVE
0 AO" 100. 160' PROJECT:ISM I SCAB AS:1070

MIR INV NISI MU OM 11111111r Mr MU NIB ' MIMI- IIIIII: Mt- 111117 I. 1 11111117 IIIIIII: IOW SW or:
•
LEGEND
9 PRESSURE GAUGE
.1 SAMPLING PORT
BALL VALVE
I I STRAINER
-0- FLOW METER
EXHAUST
1/1 CHECK VALVE I
3 FLOAT CARBON
/SYSTEM FILTERS
_� /!
FILTER 1
PRESSURE ,fes
3 FLOAT SWITCH
SYSTEM
BLOWER
1::1-, ~Cji I
I
TRANSFER TANK TRANSFER AERATION TRANSFER
PUMP UNIT PUMP TO DISCHARGE LOCATION
PROBE CONTROLS
/moi SUBMERSIBLE PUMP '''.,�
, •
‘,4 -11° -. -"'�"".a ENVIRONMENTAL
" L � ', (/LEJ. COOPER
-2 ENGINEERS GEOLOGISTS SCIENTISTS
RW (TYP-7) „
CONCEPTUAL TREATMENT SYSTEM SCHEMATIC
J';°O....N.E, ``sem TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATION
N
T
H
'.....w...i.‘.,,,' PROJECT: 95228' NORNOTCTO SCALE
DWG: SW\95228SYS FIGURE: 4

..
°
I
^'
, .
I
_
I
I
^ 4
•
•
|^ - ' '
. ` ^ ~ ^ " ~ " ~ � ' : ° � ' ' ^
' `� '^ �• ° . , ^ OR CONCRETE OR . S " ~^ .^ 4 ,
4 ~^ ^ 4 ^ ^
�� ^ , ^ ^ ' � . . ^ ^^• ^ ^ . ' ,
^ » ^ .
0
-0
-0
-00000
-0
-0
-0Cr-00000000000000000c
. 300000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000c |
0000000000000
~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - -000000000000 a^
0000000000000 D0000000000000
0 00000000000000000000000000000
^
.
r 6'
2110 PvC 2"0 PVC AIR =111=-
11_IF EllE
alE
NATIVE SOIL
- 24" '
U�
��
��
rtttttttttttt„ *
� •
:
-
i - ��� �• �/�� e °nOPER En0RONMENTAL
.
ENGINEERS GEOLOGISTS SCIENTISTS
�S.
,
I
°+`� TxpIC«L TnowCaown DETAIL — caono SECTION..^..``
TRINITY AMERICAN CORPORATIONoLomoLx. NORTH CAROLINAI
PROJECT
eoz�u SCALE: 1” ~ o'
>
DWG. or\euoaarn FIGURE: 6

k.
I APPENDIX 2
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SUMMARY CHART
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

•
�' t�tpttn11irr+ri
aaaa bC}'Ij�^�,e7�qi��i
ac o•
4,
•
Tog RESEARCh & AN ��::...**1.....a."...�-tk4'.0
•A�yTICA�
I •
LABORATORIES, INC. =�'� c
jr
' Analytical/Process Consultations '•,o it.��R Q' 'di a
•,,�,1ED also' aha
Volatile Organic Analysis from Selected Sampling Locations Identified as Trinity Foam Remediation
I
(A Geoscience & Technology Project #97-144, 24 August 2000)
Volatile Organics Quantitation A.S. C.C.
EPA Method 8021 Limit Influent Effluent Effluent
Parameter 1 1 fag/1) S 1 (WI
1,1-Dichloroethane 0 0010 0 050 SQL BQL
2,2-Dichloropropane 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
Chloroform 0 0010 BQL SQL SQL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0001D 0126 BQL BQL
1,1-Dichlaropropene 00010 SQL SQL SQL
Carbon Tetrachloride 00010 0.0042 SQL BQL •
Benzene 0 0010 601. SQL BQL
1,2-Dichloroethane 0 0010 0 0027 BQL SQL
Trichloroethene 00070 00051 SQL BQL
1,2-Dichloropropane 00010 SQL SQL SQL
Dibromomethane 00010 SQL BQL BQL
Toluene 0 0010 BQL BQL SQL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0 0010 SQL BQL BQL
I 1,3-Dichloropropane 00010 SQL SQL SQL
Tetrachloroethane 0 0010 SQL SQL BQL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 00010 SQL SQL SQL •
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0 0010 SQL BOL BQL
1,2,3-Trlchloropropane 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
I
HexacNorobutadiene 0 0070 BQL SQL SQL
Bromobenzene 00010 SQL SQL SQL
Ethylbenzene 00010 SQL SQL BQL
Styrene 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
Bromoform 0 0010 BQL SQL SQL
I p-Isopropyltoluene 00010 BOL SQL SQL
N-Butylbenzene 0 0010 SQL BQL SQL
Naphthalene 00010 BQL BOL BQL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0 0010 BOL SQL SQL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0 0010 SQL BQL SQL
i
1,2,4-Trichiorobenzene 00010 BQL SQL BQL
1,2,3•Trichlorobenzene 00010 SQL SQL BQL
Chlorobenzene 00010 SQL SQL SQL
2-Chlorotoluene 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
4-CNorotoluene 0 0010 SOL BQL SQL
Tert-Butylbenzene 00010 SQL BQL BQL
Sec-Butytbenzene 00010 SQL SQL SQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 00070 SQL SQL SQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
I-Propylbenzene 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
i N-Propylbenzene 00010 SQL BQL SQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 00010 SQL SQL SQL
DiWamochloromethane O 0010 BOL BQL SQL
DicNorocefluoromethane 0 0010 BQL SQL SQL
Chloromethane 0 0010 SQL 801. SQL
I
Vinyl Chloride 00010 SQL BQL SQL
8romomethene 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
Chloroethane 00010 00024 SQL BQL
Trichlorofluoromethane 0 0010 SOL BQL BQL
1,1-Dichloroethene 00010 0047 SOL SQL
Methylene Chloride 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
Trans-1,2-DIcNoroethene 00010 801. BQL SQL
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 00010 0 ooal SQL SQL
Bromodichloromethane 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
Bromochloromethane 0 0010 SQL SQL SQL
Cls-1,3-Dichloropropene 00010 SQL SQL BQL
I
Trans-1,3-Oichloropropena 00010 SQL SQL BQL
Total Xylenes 00010
SQL
SQL SQL
Dilution Factor 1 1 1
Sample Number 399201 399200 399199
Sample Date 08/24/00 08/24/00 • 08/24/00
Sample Time 1255 1235 1225
IBQL = Below Quantitation Limits mg/1 = milligrams per liter = parts per million
Fn: L:\NORK\RCPORTS\ORND_NST\NATBRS\11022\CBOSCIBN00
I

111111 w — UN NM MN — ■I S S MO — all SE MO i MO MN In
• 7 RESEARCh & ANA[riCA[ ..,
'o,e, CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD '
��� � LABORATORIES, INC.
�, Analytical / Process Consultations
Phone [phone]
COMPA_NcD WATERIWASTEWATER MISC.
C crrn/Cc" rc/lN�to y I ,f JO,��- 144 ,s,-,„0.
Z05 STREET ODA140/1/610 S �' PR�Y�J/EfCT ��} �) �1a,
CITY,STATE,ZIP / < 40 0/004 °wOv ��• 1
4)I1 SLUMS N,C - 27/06/O6 'LES 1I PLEAS4P T) E, �Q ` y0`Jct C3 1 ��
Li77-
RES
TA J (/ _ s°t° ov �4' e , ,.- a``'rk
PHONE P SIGNAT R
_ f376- 8% -000 s Q�� `�e 0
' v (, , 0 0 v CPQ.
DATE TIME COUP GRAB TE4P K° x L . ' ',� , , ,vQ G,yQ vQ',yQ yS�
9 ��q
8 /2zy / - REQUESTED ANALYSIS
CJ c,c, CFR-VW- 4 goat
/Z- r) q,s G-clvFiri 4
n�3 w �n/Fc-vim 4 1
•
•
1
REUNQUI HED BY DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY REMARKS:
II
,411.0 £. --) ail (.e___
INQUI• ED BY DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY
1 SAMPLE TEMPERATURE AT RECEIPT S I9 °C

r
• Table 4
SUMMARY
I Groundwater Remediation System
Performance Data
April 2000
ITrinity American Corporation
1,1 DCA 1,1,1 TCA TCE Dichiorodifluoro Chloroethane 1,1 DCE C - 1,2
I Location Date (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) methane (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) DCE(ppb)
Air 5/4/98 2760.0 3160.0 118.0 580.0 437.0 227.0 435.0
Stripper 5/22/98 218.0 343.0 BDL BDL 27.0 400.0 27.0
Influent 6/1/98 198.0 328.0 BDL BDL 32.0 46.2 20.0
7/21/98 72.7 111.4 BDL BDL 8.6 29.8 15.4
I 8/25/98 56.6 80.8 BDL BDL 0.0 17.2 13.4
9/28/98 46.7 85.0 BDL BDL 0.0 20.4 8.7
10/21/98 67.2 85.6 BDL BDL 5.6 9.5 8.5
I 11/30/98 51.0 86.0 BDL BDL 0.0 21.0 7.9
12/17/98 29.0 32.0 10.0 BDL 3.2 18.0 3.0
1/29/99 38.0 41.0 1.1 BDL 5.0 15.0 4.2
I
4/30/99 39.0 50.0 BDL BDL 4.8 31.0 , 2.5
10/29/99 25.0 45.0 1.5 BDL 2.6 27.0 3.9
1/25/00 44.0 83.0 BDL BDL BDL 43.0 7.0
4/28/00 43 64 2.6 BDL 3.3 32 6.4
IAir 5/4/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL • BDL
Stripper 5/22/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Effluent 6/1/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
1 7/21/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BOL
8/25/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
9/28/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
I 10/21/98 BOL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
11/30/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
12/17/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
I 1/29/99 BDL ' BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
4/30/99 BOL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
1/25/00 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
I 10/29/99 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
4/28/00 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL _
Carbon 5/4/98 BDL BDL BDL BOL BDL BDL BDL
I System 5/22/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Effluent 6/1/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
7/21/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
I 8/25/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
9/28/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
10/21/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
11/30/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
12/17/98 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
1/29/99 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
I 4/30/99 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
10/29/99 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
1/25/00 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
I
4/28/00 BDL BDL BDL BDL _ BDL BDL BDL

NB MI =I EMI 11111 11111 MI NM NEI MI !MI INN INN IMP INN
Chart 1 : Air Stripper Influent •
(prior to treatment)
Groundwater Remediation System
Trinity American Corporation
3500.0
11
3000.0 '
2500.0
a
2000.0 1,1 DCA (ppb)
0 1,1,1 TCA (ppb)
w –TCE (ppb)
1500.0 - —X— Dichlorodifluoromethane (ppb) '.
—X—Chloroethane (ppb)
—9-1,1 DCE (ppb)
1000.0 C - 1,2 DCE (ppb)
500.0 h
\ 1�
�% f % �f///,\ / A (�^� OO
-500.0
Sampling Event
July 2000