The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140335 Ver 1_Draft_MP_20150313 MITIGATION PLAN AYCOCK SPRINGS STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE Alamance County, North Carolina Full Delivery Contract No. 5791 USACE Action ID No. SAW-2014-01711 Cape Fear River Basin Cataloging Unit 03030002 Prepared for: NCDENR-Ecosystem Enhancement Program 217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 March 2015 MITIGATION PLAN AYCOCK SPRINGS STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE Alamance County, North Carolina Full Delivery Contract No. 5791 USACE Action ID No. SAW-2014-01711 Cape Fear River Basin Cataloging Unit 03030002 Prepared for: NCDENR-Ecosystem Enhancement Program 217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Prepared by: And Restoration Systems, LLC Axiom Environmental, Inc. 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Contact: Worth Creech Contact: Grant Lewis 919-755-9490 (phone) 919-215-1693 (phone) 919-755-9492 (fax) March 2015 Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Executive Summary page i Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site (Site) is located approximately 1.5 miles north of Elon and Gibsonville in western Alamance County within 14-digit Cataloging Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03030002030010 of the Cape Fear River Basin. The Site encompasses approximately 13 acres of agricultural land used for livestock grazing and timber production. The Site is situated along Travis Creek and four unnamed tributaries (UT’s) to Travis Creek. Existing streams have been cleared, dredged, trampled by livestock, eroded vertically and laterally, and receive extensive sediment and nutrient inputs from livestock and adjacent runoff. A breached dam located at the downstream extent of Travis Creek doesn’t effectively pass storm flows and impounds water during rain events. In addition, streamside wetlands have been cleared and drained by channel downcutting and land uses. The Site was identified to assist the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in meeting its stream and wetland restoration goals. Site activities include the restoration of perennial and intermittent stream channels, enhancement (Level II) of the perennial stream channel, and re-establishment of riparian wetlands. Priority I restoration of intermittent channels at the Site is imperative to provide significant functional uplift to Site hydrology, water quality, and habitat, in addition to restore adjacent streamside, riparian wetlands. A total of 3628 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 0.5 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs) are being offered as depicted in the following table. Stream Mitigation Type Perennial Stream (linear feet) Intermittent Stream (linear feet) Ratio Stream Mitigation Units Restoration 3058 299 1:1 3357 Enhancement (Level II) 677 -- 2.5:1 271 Totals 3735 299 3628 Wetland Mitigation Type Acreage Ratio Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units Riparian Re-establishment 0.5 1:1 0.5 Riparian Enhancement 1.5* -- Totals 2.0 0.5 *Wetland enhancement acreage is not included in mitigation credit calculations as per RFP 16-005568 requirements. Positive aspects supporting proposed mitigation activities at the Site include the following.  Streams have a Best Usage Classification of WS-V, NSW  Located in a Targeted Local Watershed and within the NCEEP Travis, Tickle, Little Alamance Local Watershed Planning (LWP) Area  Travis Creek is listed on the NCDENR 2012 303(d) list for ecolo gical/biological integrity  Immediately south and abutting the Site is a property identified in the Little Alamance, Travis, & Tickle Creek Watersheds Restoration Plan (PTCOG 2008) as a target property for wetland restoration and streambank enhancement/conservation  Immediately west of the Site is a large tract associated with Guilford County open space Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Executive Summary page ii Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina The following six goals were identified by the Stakeholder group of the Travis, Tickle, Little Alamance LWP Phase I assessment which address the water quality impacts and watershed needs in all of the Little Alamance, Travis, Tickle watersheds in 2006. 1) Increase local government awareness of the impacts of urban growth on water resources; 2) Strengthen watershed protection standards; 3) Improve water quality through stormwater management; 4) Identify and rank parcels for retrofits, stream repair, preservation, and/or conservation; 5) Assess aquatic health to identify stressors that are the most likely causes of poor biological conditions; 6) Meet requirements of outside funding sources for implementation of projects. The eight priority goals of the Travis, Tickle, Little Alamance LWP include the following. 1) reduce sediment loading; 2) reduce nutrient loading; 3) manage stormwater runoff; 4) reduce toxic inputs; 5) provide and improve instream habitat; 6) provide and improve terrestrial habitat; 7) improve stream stability; and 8) improve hydrologic function. The following table summarizes the project goals/objectives and proposed functional uplift based on proposed restoration activities and observations of two reference areas located in the vicinity of the Site. Goals and objectives target functional uplift identified in the Travis, Tickle, Little Alamance LWP and based stream/wetland functional assessments developed by the regulatory agencies. Project Goals and Objectives Project Goal/Objective How Goal/Objective will be Accomplished Improve Hydrology Restore Floodplain Access Building a new channel at the historic floodplain elevation to restore overbank flows Restore Wooded Riparian Buffer Planting a woody riparian buffer Restore Stream Stability Providing proper channel width and depth, stabilizing channel banks, providing gravel/cobble substrate, planting a woody riparian buffer, and removing cattle Improve Sediment Transport to Convert the UT’s from Sand/Silt Dominated to Gravel/Cobble Dominated Streams Improve Stream Geomorphology Increase Surface Storage and Retention Building a new channel at the historic floodplain elevation restoring overbank flows, removing cattle, scarifying compacted soils, and planting woody vegetation Restore Appropriate Inundation/Duration Increase Subsurface Storage and Retention Raising the stream bed elevation and rip compacted soils Improve Water Quality Increase Upland Pollutant Filtration Planting a native, woody riparian buffer Increase Thermoregulation Planting a native, woody riparian buffer Reduce Stressors and Sources of Pollution Removing cattle and other agricultural inputs Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Executive Summary page iii Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Increase Removal and Retention of Pathogens, Particulates (Sediments), Dissolved Materials (Nutrients), and Toxins from the Water Column Raising the stream bed elevation, restoring overbank flows, planting with woody vegetation, removing cattle, increasing surface storage a nd retention, and restoring appropriate inundation/duration Increase Energy Dissipation of Overbank/Overland Flows/Stormwater Runoff Raising the stream bed elevation, restoring overbank flows, and planting with woody vegetation Restore Habitat Restore In-stream Habitat Building a stable channel with a cobble/gravel bed and planting a woody riparian buffer Restore Stream-side Habitat Planting a woody riparian buffer Improve Vegetation Composition and Structure This mitigation plan has been written in compliance with the requirements of the following documents, which govern NCEEP operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation.  Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(14).  NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010. This detailed mitigation plan includes 1) descriptions of existing conditions; 2) reference stream, wetland, and forest studies; 3) restoration plans; and 4) monitoring and success criteria. Proposed restoration activities may be modified during the design stage to address constraints such as access issues, sediment-erosion control measures, drainage needs (floodway constraints), or other design considerations. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Table of Contents page i Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... I 1.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION ................................................. 1 1.1 DIRECTIONS TO P ROJECT SITE ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 USGS H YDROLOGIC UNIT CODE AND NCDWR RIVER BASIN DESIGNATION....................... 1 1.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND STRUCTURE .............................................................................. 1 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ........................................................................... 6 2.1 DRAINAGE AREA ................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION/WATER QUALITY ........................................................... 6 2.3 PHYSIOGRAPHY, G EOLOGY, AND SOILS ................................................................................. 6 2.4 PROTECTED SPECIES .............................................................................................................. 7 2.5 CULTURAL R ESOURCES ......................................................................................................... 7 2.6 POTENTIAL CONSTRAINTS ..................................................................................................... 8 2.6.1 Property Ownership and Boundary ............................................................................ 8 2.6.2 Site Access ................................................................................................................. 8 2.6.3 Utilities ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.6.4 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass ...................................................................................... 8 3.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) ............................................ 10 3.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY .......................................................................................... 10 3.2 CHANNEL CLASSIFICATION AND MORPHOLOGY .................................................................. 10 3.3 CHANNEL EVOLUTION ......................................................................................................... 13 3.4 VALLEY CLASSIFICATION .................................................................................................... 13 3.5 DISCHARGE ......................................................................................................................... 13 3.6 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................... 13 3.6.1 Stream Power ........................................................................................................ 13 3.6.2 Shear Stress ........................................................................................................... 14 3.6.3 Stream Power and Shear Stress Methods and Results .......................................... 15 3.7 BANKFULL VERIFICATION ................................................................................................... 17 4.0 REFERENCE STREAMS................................................................................................... 18 4.1 CHANNEL CLASSIFICATION ................................................................................................. 18 4.2 DISCHARGE ......................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY .................................................................................................... 19 5.0 PROJECT SITE WETLANDS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) ......................................... 19 5.1 EXISTING JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS ............................................................................... 19 5.2 HYDROLOGICAL C HARACTERIZATION ................................................................................. 19 5.3 SOIL CHARACTERIZATION ................................................................................................... 20 5.3.1 Taxonomic Classification......................................................................................... 20 5.3.2 Profile Description ................................................................................................... 20 5.4 PLANT COMMUNITY CHARACTERIZATION ........................................................................... 20 6.0 REFERENCE FOREST ECOSYSTEM ............................................................................ 20 Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Table of Contents page ii Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 7.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN ........................................................................ 21 7.1 RESTORATION P ROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................... 21 7.2 STREAM DESIGN .................................................................................................................. 23 7.2.1 Designed Channel Classification ............................................................................. 23 7.2.2 Target Wetland Communities/Buffer Communities ................................................ 23 7.3 STREAM R ESTORATION ....................................................................................................... 23 7.4 STREAM ENHANCEMENT (LEVEL II) .................................................................................... 25 7.5 SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 25 7.6 HEC RAS ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 25 7.7 HYDROLOGICAL MODIFICATIONS (WETLAND RE-ESTABLISHMENT AND ENHANCEMENT).. 26 7.8 SOIL RESTORATION ............................................................................................................. 26 7.9 NATURAL PLANT COMMUNITY RESTORATION .................................................................... 27 7.9.1 Planting Plan ............................................................................................................ 27 7.9.2 Nuisance Species Management ................................................................................ 27 8.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ........................................................................................... 29 8.1 STREAMS ............................................................................................................................. 29 8.1.1 Stream Success Criteria............................................................................................ 29 8.1.2 Stream Contingency ................................................................................................. 29 8.2 WETLANDS .......................................................................................................................... 31 8.2.1 Wetland Success Criteria ......................................................................................... 31 8.2.2 Wetland Contingency ............................................................................................... 32 8.3 VEGETATION ....................................................................................................................... 32 8.3.1 Vegetation Success Criteria ..................................................................................... 32 8.3.2 Vegetation Contingency ........................................................................................... 33 9.0 MAINTENANCE PLAN ..................................................................................................... 33 10.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................................... 33 11.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN .............................................................................. 34 12.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES ........................................................................................... 34 13.0 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE ................................................................................... 36 14.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 38 Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Table of Contents page iii Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina TABLES Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits .................................................................... 2 Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ........................................................................... 4 Table 3. Project Contacts Table ..................................................................................................... 4 Table 4. Project Attribute Table..................................................................................................... 4 Table 5. Site Soils .......................................................................................................................... 7 Table 6. Morphological Stream Characteristics........................................................................... 11 Table 7. Stream Power () and Shear Stress () Values ............................................................. 16 Table 8. Reference Reach Bankfull Discharge Analysis ............................................................. 17 Table 9. Reference Forest Ecosystem .......................................................................................... 21 Table 10. Project Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................... 22 Table 11. Planting Plan ................................................................................................................ 28 Table 12. Stream Goals and Success Criteria .............................................................................. 30 Table 13. Wetland Goals and Success Criteria ............................................................................ 32 Table 14. Site Maintenance Plan ................................................................................................. 33 APPENDICES Appendix A. Figures Figure 1. Project Location Figure 2. Hydrologic Unit Map Figure 3. Topography and Drainage Area Figure 4. Existing Conditions Figure 5A. Cedarock Reference Drainage Area Figure 5B. Cedarock Reference Existing Conditions Figure 5C. Cedarock Reference Reach Dimension, Pattern, and Profile Figures 6A-C. Restoration Plan Figure 7. Proposed Dimension, Pattern, and Profile Figures 8A-B. Typical Structure Details Figure 9. Planting Plan Appendix B. Existing Stream Data Figure B1. Cross-section Locations Existing Stream Data Appendix C. Flood Frequency Analysis Data Appendix D. Jurisdictional Determination Information Appendix E. Categorical Exclusion Document Appendix F. NCEEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist/HEC RAS Output Appendix G. Performance Bond Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 1 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 1.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION The Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site (Site) is located approximately 1.5 miles north of Elon and Gibsonville in western Alamance County (Figure 1, Appendix A). The Site encompasses approximately 13 acres of agricultural land used for livestock grazing, hay production, and timber harvest. Within the Site, existing streams have been cleared, trampled by livestock, eroded vertically and laterally, and receive extensive sediment and nutrient inputs from livestock and timber harvest activities. Stream impacts in Travis Creek have also occurred due to a breached dam that impounds water during storm events. In addition, streamside wetlands have been drained by channel incision, soil compaction, the loss of forest vegetation, and land uses. 1.1 Directions to Project Site Directions to the Site from Interstate 40/85 in Burlington/Elon, North Carolina.  Exit onto University Drive (I-40/85 Exit 140) and travel north towards Elon,  Travel north for 2.8 miles and merge with NC 100,  Continue on University Drive (NC 100) for 0.5 mile and turn left onto Manning Street (SR 1503),  Travel northwest for 0.8 mile and turn right onto Gibsonville-Ossipee Road (SR 1500),  Travel north for 0.7 mile and Site is on the right. o Site Latitude, Longitude 36.127271ºN, 79.525214ºW (NAD83/WGS84) 1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWR River Basin Designation The Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin in 14-digit United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03030002030010 of the South Atlantic/Gulf Region (North Carolina Division of Water Resources [NCDWR], formerly the North Carolina Division of Water Quality subbasin number 03-06-02) [Figure 2, Appendix A]). Topographic features of the Site include Travis Creek, which has been assigned Stream Index Number 16-12 and a Best Usage Classification of WS-V, NSW (NCDWR 2013). 1.3 Project Components and Structure Proposed restoration activities include the construction of meandering, E/C-type stream channel resulting in 3357 linear feet of Priority I and II stream restoration, 677 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level II), 0.5 acres of riparian wetland re-establishment, and 1.5 acres of riparian wetland enhancement (Table 1). Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background information are summarized in Tables 2-4. Mi t i g a t i o n P l a n ( C o n t r a c t N o . 5 7 9 1 ) page 2 Ay c o c k S p r i n g s S t r e a m a n d W e t l a n d R e s t o r a t i o n S i t e R e s t o r a t i o n S y s t e m s , L L C Al a m a n c e C o u n t y , N o r t h C a r o l i n a Ta b l e 1 . P r o j e c t C o m p o n e n t s a n d M i t i g a t i o n C r e d i t s Ay c o c k S p r i n g s R e s t o r a t i o n S i t e Mi t i g a t i o n C r e d i t s St r e a m S tream Ri p a r i a n W e t l a n d No n r i p a r i a n W e t l a n d Re s t o r a t i o n En h a n c e m e n t Re -es t a b l i s h m e n t Re-establishment 33 5 7 27 1 0. 5 -- Pr o j e c t s C o m p o n e n t s S t a t i o n R a n g e Ex i s t i n g L i n e a r Fo o t a g e / Ac r e a g e Pr i o r i t y Ap p r o a c h Re s t o r a t i o n / Re s t o r a t i o n Eq u i v a l e n t Re s t o r a t i o n Li n e a r F o o t a g e / Ac r e a g e Mi t i g a t i o n Ra t i o Mi t i g a t i o n Cr e d i t s Comment UT 1 S t a t i o n 0 0 + 0 6 t o 1 3 + 2 1 1 1 7 3 P I R e s t o r a t i o n 13 1 5 - 2 4 = 12 9 1 1: 1 1 2 9 1 24 lf of UT 1 is located outside of ea s e m e n t a n d i s n o t c r e d i t g e n e r a t i n g UT 2 S t a t i o n 0 0 + 0 0 t o 0 6 + 7 5 7 2 3 PI R e s t o r a t i o n 6 7 5 1: 1 6 7 5 UT 3 S t a t i o n 0 0 + 0 0 t o 0 2 + 1 2 1 6 3 PI R e s t o r a t i o n 2 1 2 1: 1 2 1 2 UT 4 S t a t i o n 0 0 + 0 0 t o 0 4 + 1 3 4 4 8 PI R e s t o r a t i o n 41 3 - 1 0 7 = 30 6 1: 1 3 0 6 Th e u p p e r 1 0 7 l i n e a r f e e t o f c h a n n e l i s in a v i o l a t i o n a r e a a n d i s n o t c r e d i t generating Tr a v i s C r e e k St a t i o n 0 0 + 0 0 t o 0 5 + 7 8 57 8 E I I 5 7 8 2 . 5 : 1 2 3 1 Tr a v i s C r e e k St a t i o n 0 5 + 7 8 t o 0 7 + 8 7 27 4 P I I R e s t o r a t i o n 2 0 9 1 : 1 2 0 9 Tr a v i s C r e e k St a t i o n 0 7 + 8 7 t o 0 8 + 8 6 99 E I I 9 9 2 . 5 : 1 4 0 Tr a v i s C r e e k St a t i o n 1 3 + 7 1 t o 2 0 + 3 5 93 6 P I R e s t o r a t i o n 6 6 4 1: 1 6 6 4 Mi t i g a t i o n P l a n ( C o n t r a c t N o . 5 7 9 1 ) page 3 Ay c o c k S p r i n g s S t r e a m a n d W e t l a n d R e s t o r a t i o n S i t e R e s t o r a t i o n S y s t e m s , L L C Al a m a n c e C o u n t y , N o r t h C a r o l i n a Ta b l e 1 . P r o j e c t C o m p o n e n t s a n d M i t i g a t i o n C r e d i t s ( c o n t i n u e d ) Ay c o c k S p r i n g s R e s t o r a t i o n S i t e Co m p o n e n t S u m m a t i o n Re s t o r a t i o n L e v e l St r e a m ( l i n e a r f o o t a g e ) Ri p a r i a n W e t l a n d ( a c r e a g e ) No n r i p a r i a n W e t l a n d ( a c r e a g e ) Re s t o r a t i o n 33 5 7 * 0. 5 -- E n h a n c e m e n t ( L e v e l 1 ) - - - - -- En h a n c e m e n t ( L e v e l I I ) 67 7 -- En h a n c e m e n t -- 1. 5 * * To t a l s 40 3 4 -- -- Mi t i g a t i o n U n i t s 36 2 8 S M U s 0. 5 R i p a r i a n W M U s 0. 0 0 N o n r i p a r i a n W MUs *A n a d d i t i o n a l 1 6 5 l i n e a r f e e t o f s t r e a m r e s t o r a t i o n i s p r o p o s e d o u t s i d e o f t h e e a s e m e n t a n d i s t h e r e f o r e n o t i n c l u d e d i n t h i s t o t a l o r i n m i t i g a t i o n c r e d i t ca l c u l a t i o n s . ** W e t l a n d e n h a n c e m e n t a c r e a g e i s n o t i n c l u d e d i n m i t i g a t i o n c r e d i t c a l c u l a t i o n s a s p e r R F P 1 6 - 0 0 5 5 6 8 r e q u i r e m e n t s . Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 4 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Aycock Springs Restoration Site Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery Technical Proposal (RFP No. 16-005568) -- October 2013 EEP Contract No. 5791 -- February 2014 Mitigation Plan October 2014 March 2015 Construction Plans -- --- Table 3. Project Contacts Table Aycock Springs Restoration Site Full Delivery Provider Restoration Systems 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Worth Creech 919-755-9490 Designer Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 Grant Lewis 919-215-1693 Table 4. Project Attribute Table Aycock Springs Restoration Site Project Information Project Name Aycock Springs Restoration Site Project County Alamance County, North Carolina Project Area (acres) 15 Project Coordinates (latitude & latitude) 36.127271ºN, 79.525214ºW Project Watershed Summary Information Physiographic Province Piedmont Project River Basin Cape Fear USGS HUC for Project (14-digit) 03030002030010 NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project 03-06-02 Project Drainage Area (acres) 26-3008 Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <2% Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 5 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Table 4. Project Attribute Table (continued) Aycock Springs Restoration Site Reach Summary Information Parameters Travis Cr UT 1/UT2 UT 3 UT 4 Length of reach (linear feet) 1550 1966 212 413 Valley Classification alluvial Drainage Area (acres) 3008 68 26 119 NCDWQ Stream ID Score -- 30.75/25.5 26.75 27.5 NCDWR Water Quality Classification WS-V, NSW Existing Morphological Description (Rosgen 1996) Cg 5/6-, Eg 5-, and Fc 5-type Existing Evolutionary Stage (Simon and Hupp 1986) IV IV III III Underlying Mapped Soils Cecil, Helena, Mixed Alluvial Land, Severely Gullied Land, Worsham Drainage Class Well-drained, moderately well-drained, poorly drained, variable, poorly drained Hydric Soil Status Nonhydric and Hydric Slope 0.0023 0.0249 0.0153 0.0093 FEMA Classification AE Special Hazard Flood Area Native Vegetation Community Piedmont Alluvial Forest/Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest Watershed Land Use/Land Cover (Site) 42% forest, 53% agricultural land, <5% low density residential/impervious surface Watershed Land Use/Land Cover (Cedarock Reference Channel) 65% forest, 30% agricultural land, <5% low density residential/impervious surface Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation < 5% Wetland Summary Information Parameters Wetlands Wetland acreage 1.6 Wetland Type Riparian Mapped Soil Series Worsham and Mixed Alluvial Land Drainage Class Poorly drained Hydric Soil Status Hydric Source of Hydrology Groundwater, stream overbank Hydrologic Impairment Incised streams, compacted soils, livestock Native Vegetation Community Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation <5% Regulatory Considerations Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Documentation Waters of the United States-Section 401 Yes In progress JD Package (App D) Waters of the United States-Section 404 Yes In progress JD Package (App D) Endangered Species Act No -- CE Doc. (App E) Historic Preservation Act No -- CE Doc. (App E) Coastal Zone Management Act No -- NA FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes In progress Appendix F Essential Fisheries Habitat No -- NA Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 6 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION 2.1 Drainage Area The Site provides water quality function to a 0.11-square mile (68-acre) watershed at the Site outfall of UT1 and a 4.7-square mile (3008-acre) watershed at the Site outfall of Travis Creek (Figure 3, Appendix A). The Site drainage area is primarily composed of agricultural pasture, with sparse residential areas along state maintained roads, and forest land in the upper headwaters. Immediately west of the Site is a large tract associated with Guilford County open space (Figure 3, Appendix A). In addition, this property was identified in the Little Alamance, Travis, & Tickle Creek Watersheds Restoration Plan (PTCOG 2008) as Travis & Tickle Site 3.1. The property was identified based on a need for wetland restoration and stream bank enhancement/conservation. 2.2 Surface Water Classification/Water Quality The Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin in 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03030002030010 of the South Atlantic/Gulf Region (NCDWR subbasin number 03-06-02) (Figure 2, Appendix A). Topographic features of the Site include Travis Creek, which has been assigned Stream Index Number 16-12 and a Best Usage Classification of WS-V, NSW (NCDWR 2013). Streams with a designation of WS-V are protected as water supplies which are generally upstream and draining to Class WS-IV waters, waters used by industry to supply their employees with drinking water, or as waters formerly used as water supply. These waters are also protected for Class C uses, such as aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses not involving human body contact with waters on an organized or frequent basis. The designation NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters) includes areas with water quality problems associated with excessive plant growth resulting from nutrient enrichment. The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) has assembled a list of impaired waterbodies according to the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) and 40 CFR 130.7, which is a comprehensive public accounting of all impaired waterbodies. An impaired waterbody is one that does not meet water quality standards including designated uses, numeric and narrative criteria, and anti-degradation requirements defined in 40 CFR 131. Travis Creek is listed on the NCDENR draft 2014 and final 2012 303(d) lists for reduced ecological/biological integrity (NCDENR 2013, NCDENR 2014). 2.3 Physiography, Geology, and Soils The Site is located in the Southern Outer Piedmont portion of the Piedmont Ecoregion of North Carolina within USGS Cataloging Unit 03030002 (NCDWR subbasin number 03-06-02) of the Cape Fear River Basin. Regional physiography is characterized by dissected irregular plains, some low rounded hills and ridges; low to moderate gradient streams with mostly cobble, gravel, and sandy substrates (Griffith et al. 2002). Onsite elevations range from a high of 630 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) at the upper reaches of UT1 to a low of approximately 600 feet NGVD at the Site outfall (USGS Ossipee, North Carolina 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle) (Figure 3, Appendix A). Geology of the Site includes intrusive rock of the Raleigh Belt. Intrusive rocks include metamorphosed granitic rock which is megacrystic, well-foliated and locally contains hornblende Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 7 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina (NCGS 1985). Rock outcrops at the Site were surveyed and depicted on mapping as avoidance areas for channel excavation. In addition, bedrock outcrops in the channels were mapped and have been incorporated into the design channel as natural grade control. Site soils are depicted on Figure 4 (Appendix A) and are summarized below. Table 5. Site Soils Aycock Springs Restoration Site Soil Series Hydric Status Description Cecil fine sandy loam (CbC2) Nonhydric The Cecil series consists of very deep, well-drained, moderately permeable soils on ridges and side slopes of the Piedmont uplands. They formed in residuum weathered from felsic, igneous and high-grade metamorphic rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Slopes range from 0 to 25 percent. Helena clay loam (HaC3) and Helena coarse sandy loam (HbB2) Nonhydric This series consists of moderately well-drained soils in ridges and hill slopes from toe slope to summits and heads of drains. They formed in residuum from granite and gneiss cut by dykes of gabbro and diorite. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent. Mixed Alluvial Land (Mc) Hydric This soil series consists of poorly-drained soils found on bottoms and along streams. This soil series is derived from material deposited by streams carried from uplands. This land is generally characterized by a high water table. Severely Gullied Land (Sa) Nonhydric This series consists of mixed soils that have been severely eroded. In some instances all horizons have been removed exposing bedrock or parent material. Worsham sandy loam (Wd) Hydric This series consists of poorly drained soils found on 2-6 percent slopes and in low wet depressions. They are derived from colluvium and alluvial materials primarily of the slate belt. These soils are widespread throughout the county. 2.4 Protected Species Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Based on the most recently updated county-by-county database of federally listed species in North Carolina as posted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) at http://www.fws.gov/southeast/es/county%20lists.htm, no federally protected species are listed for Alamance County. 2.5 Cultural Resources The term “cultural resources” refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact deposits over 50 years old. “Significant” cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of Site Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 8 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina significance are made with reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (36 CFR 60) and in consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). In a letter dated March 20, 2014, SHPO indicated they “conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.” A copy of the letter is included in the Categorical Exclusion document in Appendix E. 2.6 Potential Constraints The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities within the Site were evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials, utilities and restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, and the potential for hydrologic trespass. Existing information regarding constraints was acquired and reviewed. In addition, any Site conditions that have the potential to restrict the proposed restoration design and implementation were documented during the field investigation. No constraints that may hinder restoration activities have been identified for this Site. 2.6.1 Property Ownership and Boundary The property is held by Gary Oakley. A perpetual conservation easement will be prepared that incorporates the results of this study. The conservation easement will be depicted on a recordable map, signed by the owner, and recorded in Alamance County. 2.6.2 Site Access The Site is accessed from Amick Road (SR 1549) for proposed restoration work on UT 1 and UT 2, or from Gibsonville-Ossipee Road (SR 1500) for proposed restoration work on UT 3, UT 4, and Travis Creek. An access easement to the conservation easement will be obtained and recorded in Alamance County. 2.6.3 Utilities Utilities are not located within the vicinity of the project and are therefore not considered a constraint for this project. 2.6.4 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass Surface drainage on the Site and surrounding areas have been analyzed to predict the feasibility of manipulating existing surface drainage patterns without adverse effects to the Site or adjacent properties. The following presents a summary of hydrologic and hydraulic analyses along with provisions designed to maximize groundwater recharge and wetland re-establishment while reducing potential impacts to adjacent properties. Two HEC-RAS models were prepared for this project; a bed shear stress model and a FEMA model. The bed shear stress model is highly detailed with cross sections every 50 to 150 feet in the project area. The purpose of this analysis is to predict f lood elevations and bed shear stress for the bankfull, 2-times bankfull, 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 100-year return period storms under both the existing conditions and the proposed post-restoration conditions. This model is not Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 9 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina calibrated to analyze FEMA flood elevations and hydraulic trespass. The comparative flood elevations were evaluated using simulated peak flood discharges generated with the NRCS TR-55 method and regional regression curves. The FEMA model contains cross sections spaced 100’- 500’ apart over a larger portion of the studied stream and has been calibrated to analyze FEMA flood elevations. The purpose of this analysis is to predict changes in FEMA flood elevations between the existing conditions and the proposed post-restoration conditions that would result in hydraulic trespass. The comparative flood elevations were provided in the FEMA FIS report for Alamance County dated September 6, 2006. The existing river geometry was digitized from a DTM (digital terrain model) surface, prepared by a professional surveyor, using Microstation Geopak software. Cross sections were cut using Geopak at strategic locations with the intent to generate the most accurate and useful model output as reasonably possible. Existing cross sections were cut using the DTM and adjusted where necessary based on field-collected data. Proposed post-restoration sections were cut using the existing cross sections and a proposed typical stream section and profile, with some slight adjustments made for realistic constructability. These cross sections were then imported into HEC-RAS. Watershed measurements and land use estimates were made using the existing DEM (digital elevation model) data and aerial photography. Observations of the existing hydraulic and hydrographic characteristics were incorporated into the model, and adjustments were made to the model where necessary based on engineering judgment. Analysis of the FEMA model indicates that FEMA 100-year flood elevations will not increase due to the proposed stream and wetland restoration design and no additional hydraulic trespass will occur compared to existing conditions (HEC RAS data and output are included in Appendix F). A maximum decrease in FEMA 100-year flood elevation of 0.20 feet is expected within the project vicinity. The decrease in flood elevation, along with a change in the location of the floodway indicates a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) may be needed for the Site. The CLOMR will be completed at the discretion of the local Floodplain Administrator. Coordination with FEMA representatives (see EEP Floodplain Requirement Checklist in Appendix F) has been initiated. Inspection of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map 3710884600K, effective June 18, 2007, indicates that Travis Creek is located within a Zone AE flood area. In addition, Site UT’s are located within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and are backwater only. There are no FEMA models for these UTs have not been studied individually, so comparative models for these reaches are not necessary. The CLOMR will include written documentation of modeling, preparation of topographic work maps, annotated FIRM or Floodway Maps, FIRM Flood Profiles and Data Tables. The CLOMR will be sent to Alamance County for approval and signature, and then the CLOMR will be sent to FEMA for review and approval. The CLOMR approval process is expected to take 3-6 months. The CLOMR should be prepared, submitted, and approved prior to construction. A requirement of the CLOMR is to prepare and submit a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) once construction is complete. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 10 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 3.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) Streams targeted for restoration include UTs to Travis Creek (UTs 1-4) and Travis Creek proper. The UTs have been cleared, dredged of cobble substrate, trampled by livestock, eroded vertically and laterally, and receive extensive sediment and nutrient inputs from livestock. Approximately 95 percent of the existing UT stream channels have been degraded contributing to sediment export from the Site. In addition, streamside wetlands have been cleared and drained by channel downcutting and land uses. Travis Creek is targeted for restoration in two outer bends tha t are characterized by excessive shear and tight meander radii, as well as the downstream reach which historically was impounded by an agricultural dam. The dam has been breached and a channel has scoured sediment from the historic impoundment; however, the breach is small enough to impede stormwater pulses, resulting in hydrologic stacking of water upstream from the breach area. Approximately 30 percent of the existing Travis Creek stream channel has been degraded from vegetative clearing, erosion of channel banks, and impediment of stormwater flows. Current Site conditions have resulted in degraded water quality, a loss of aquatic habitat, reduced nutrient and sediment retention, and unstable channel characteristics (loss of horizontal flow vectors that maintain pools and an increase in erosive forces to channel bed and banks). Site restoration activities will restore riffle-pool morphology, aid in energy dissipation, increase aquatic habitat, stabilize channel banks, and greatly reduce sediment loss from channel banks. 3.1 Existing Conditions Survey Site stream dimension, pattern, and profile were measured to characterize existing channel conditions. Locations of existing stream reaches are depicted in Figure 4 (Appendix A) and cross- section locations are depicted in Figure B1 (Appendix B). Stream geometry measurements under existing conditions are summarized in Table 6 (Morphological Stream Characteristics). 3.2 Channel Classification and Morphology Stream geometry and substrate data have been evaluated to classify existing stream conditions based on a classification utilizing fluvial geomorphic principles (Rosgen 1996). This classification stratifies streams into comparable groups based on pattern, dimension, profile, and substrate characteristics. Primary components of the classification include degree of entrenchment, width- depth ratio, sinuosity, channel slope, and stream substrate composition. Existing Site reaches are classified as unstable Cg-type, Eg-type, and Fc-type streams with little to no sinuosity. Each stream type is modified by a number 1 through 6 (e. g., E5), denoting a stream type which supports a substrate dominated by 1) bedrock, 2) boulders, 3) cobble, 4) gravel, 5) sand, or 6) silt/clay. Existing Site reaches are characterized by sand and silt substrate as the result of channel impacts including livestock trampling, channel straightening, and riparian vegetation removal. Substrate will be used in the restored stream channel to mimic relatively undisturbed reaches near the Site, which are comprised of gravel/cobble substrate. Ta b l e 6 . M o r p h o l o g i c a l S t r e a m C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s Ay c o c k S p r i n g s R e s t o r a t i o n S i t e St r e a m T y p e Dr a i n a g e A r e a ( m i 2) Ba n k f u l l D i s c h a r g e ( c f s ) Ba n k f u l l C r o s s - S e c t i o n a l A r e a ( A bk f ) 8. 0 5 . 9 4 . 3 2 . 2 4 . 3 6 . 3 6 . 3 5 4 . 9 5 4 . 9 Ex i s t i n g C r o s s - S e c t i o n a l A r e a a t T O B ( A ex i s t i n g ) 8. 0 2 . 2 - 9 . 4 5 . 8 - 6 8 . 4 2 . 2 - 1 8 . 4 4 . 3 9 . 1 - 2 5 . 6 6 . 3 2 0 . 7 - 5 4 . 9 5 4 . 9 Me a n : 8 . 1 M e a n : 4 . 6 M e a n : 6. 7 Me a n : 4. 5 Me a n : 7 . 8 M e a n : 8.3Mean: 9.4Mean:41.4Mean: 27.7 Ra n g e : 8 . 0 - 1 2 . 1 R a n g e : 3 . 0 - 6 . 1 R a n g e : 3 . 8 - 9 . 6 R a n g e : 4 . 1 - 5 .0 R a n g e : 7 . 2 - 8 . 3 R a n g e : 4 . 8 - 1 1 . 7 R a n g e : 8 . 7 - 1 0 . 0 R a n g e : 3 0 . 0 - 51.7Range: 25.7 - 29.6 Me a n : 0. 8 Me a n : 1 . 1 M e a n : 0 . 7 M e a n : 0 . 5 M e a n : 0 . 6 M e a n : 0 . 8 M e a n : 0 . 7 Mean:1.4Mean: 2.0 Ra n g e : 0 . 8 - 1 . 0 R a n g e : 0 . 7 - 1 . 5 R a n g e : 0 . 4 - 1 . 1 R a n g e : 0 . 4 - 0 . 5 R a n g e : 0 . 5 - 0 . 7 R a n g e : 0 . 5 - 1 . 3 R a n g e : 0 . 6 - 0 . 8 R a n g e : 1 . 1 - 1 .8Range: 1.9 - 2.1 Me a n : 1 . 4 M e a n : 1 . 7 M e a n : 1 . 3 M e a n : 1 . 0 M e a n : 0 . 8 M e a n : 1.5Mean: 1.0Mean:3.7Mean: 2.8 Ra n g e : 1 . 1 - 1 . 4 R a n g e : 1 . 0 - 2 . 3 R a n g e : 0 . 8 - 1 . 8 R a n g e : 0 . 8 - 1 . 1 R a n g e : 0 . 7 - 0 . 9 R a n g e : 0 . 9 - 2 . 0 R a n g e : 0 . 8 - 1 . 1 R a n g e : 3 . 3 - 4 .1Range: 2.7 - 3.0 Me a n : 9 . 3 M e a n : 7 . 1 Me a n : 9 . 4 M e a n : 1 1 . 3 M e a n : 3 3 . 3 Ra n g e : 8 . 9 - 9 . 7 R a n g e : 7 . 1 - 7 . 1 Ra n g e : 7 . 8 - 1 2 . 5 R a n g e : 9 . 4 - 1 5 . 0 R a n g e : 2 7 . 7 - 4 4 . 3 Me a n : 1 . 8 M e a n : 1 . 8 Me a n : 1 . 1 M e a n : 1 . 3 M e a n : 3 . 8 Ra n g e : 1 . 5 - 2 . 1 R a n g e : 1 . 7 - 1 . 9 Ra n g e : 0 . 7 - 1 . 3 R a n g e : 0 . 9 - 1 . 5 R a n g e : 2 . 6 - 3 . 8 Me a n : 1 8 M e a n : 1 5 0 . 0 M e a n : 3 0 M e a n : 1 2 M e a n : 5 0 M e a n : 3 9 M e a n : 1 5 0 M e a n : 1 2 2 M e a n : 2 5 0 Ra n g e : 1 5 - 2 5 R a n g e : 1 5 0 - 1 5 0 R a n g e : 8 . 0 - 7 3 R a n g e : 7 . 0 - 1 8 . 0 R an g e : 2 0 - 7 0 R a n g e : 8 . 0 - 7 0 . 0 R a n g e : 7 0 - 2 0 0 R a n g e : 6 8 . 0 - 1 6 0 R ange: 200 - 300 Me a n : 2 . 1 M e a n : 3 7 . 3 M e a n : 4 . 6 M e a n : 2 . 5 M e a n : 6 . 4 M e a n : 4 . 9Mean: 16.0Mean:3.2Mean: 9.0 Ra n g e : 1 . 9 - 2 . 2 R a n g e : 2 4 . 6 - 5 0 R a n g e : 1 . 8 - 1 2 . 8 R a n g e : 1 . 7 - 3 .6 R a n g e : 2 . 6 - 9 . 0 R a n g e : 1 . 2 - 1 1 . 5 R a n g e : 7 . 5 - 2 1 . 3 R a n g e : 1 . 6 - 5.3Range: 7.2 - 10.8 Me a n : 1 0 . 1 M e a n : 4 . 2 M e a n : 1 1 . 6 M e a n : 9 . 9 M e a n : 1 4 . 0 M e an : 1 2 . 4 M e a n : 1 4 . 0 M e a n : 3 2 . 1 M e a n : 1 4 . 0 Ra n g e : 8 . 0 - 1 5 . 1 R a n g e : 4 . 0 - 4 . 3 R a n g e : 3 . 5 - 2 4 R a n g e : 8 . 2 - 12 . 5 R a n g e : 1 2 . 0 - 1 6 . 0 R a n g e : 3 . 7 - 2 3 . 4 R a n g e : 1 2 . 0 - 1 6 . 0 R a n ge:16.7 - 47.0Range: 12.0 - 16.0 Me a n : 1 . 4 M e a n : 1 . 5 M e a n : 1 . 9 M e a n : 2 . 2 M e a n : 1 . 4 M e a n : 1 . 9 M e a n: 1.4Mean:2.8Mean: 1.4 Ra n g e : 1 . 4 - 1 . 8 R a n g e : 1 . 4 - 1 . 5 R a n g e : 1 . 5 - 2 . 2 R a n g e : 1 . 6 - 2 . 8 R a n g e : 1 . 2 - 1 . 5 R a n g e : 1 . 4 - 2 . 2 R a n g e : 1 . 2 - 1 . 5 R a n g e : 2 . 0 - 3 .7Range: 1.2 - 1.5 Me a n : 1 . 0 M e a n : 1 . 3 M e a n : 2 . 2 M e a n : 2 . 0 M e a n : 1 . 0 M e a n : 1 . 8 M e a n: 1.0Mean:1.0Mean: 1.0 Ra n g e : 1 . 0 - 1 . 8 R a n g e : 1 . 0 - 1 . 5 R a n g e : 1 . 2 - 3 . 9 R a n g e : 1 . 0 - 3. 0 R a n g e : 1 . 0 - 1 . 3 R a n g e : 1 . 2 - 2 . 4 R a n g e : 1 . 0 - 1 . 3 R a n g e : 1 . 0 - 1.1Range: 1.0 - 1.3 Ma x i m u m P o o l D e p t h / B a n k f u l l M e a n : 1 . 9 M e a n : 1 . 9 Me a n : 1 . 9 M e a n : 1 . 9 M e a n : 1 . 9 M e a n D e p t h ( D po o l /D bk f ) Ra n g e : 0 - 2 . 1 R a n g e : 1 . 1 - 2 . 7 Ra n g e : 1 . 3 - 2 . 1 R a n g e : 1 . 3 - 2 . 1 R a n g e : 1 . 3 - 2 . 1 Po o l W i d t h / B a n k f u l l M e a n : 1 . 1 M e a n : 1 . 8 Me a n : 1 . 2 M e a n : 1 . 2 M e a n : 1 . 2 W i d t h ( W po o l /W bk f ) Ra n g e : 0 - 1 . 2 R a n g e : 1 . 2 - 2 . 4 Ra n g e : 1 . 0 - 1 . 6 R a n g e : 1 . 0 - 1 . 6 R a n g e : 1 . 0 - 1 . 6 Po o l A r e a / B a n k f u l l M e a n : 1 . 4 M e a n : 2 . 7 Me a n : 1 . 4 M e a n : 1 . 4 M e a n : 1 . 6 C r o s s S e c t i o n a l A r e a R a n g e : 0 - 1 . 6 R a n g e : 0 . 7 - 4 . 6 Ra n g e : 1 . 1 - 1 . 6 R a n g e : 1 . 1 - 1 . 6 R a n g e : 1 . 1 - 2 . 5 * C r i p p l e C r e e k i n c l u d e s m e a s u r e m e n t s f r o m a R e f e r e n c e S i t e m e as u r e d i n 2 0 0 9 . No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n of r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s Ex i s t i n g U T 4 Eg 5 0.19 24.2PROPOSEDPROPOSED Va r i a b l e s RE F E R E N C E - CE D A R O C K P A R K Ex i s t i n g U T 3 Ex i s t i n g U T 1 a n d 2 RE F E R E N C E - C R I P P L E * CR E E K Eb 4 7. 8 Di m e n s i o n V a r i a b l e s E4 0. 1 7 0. 2 1 Di m e n s i o n R a t i o s Po o l W i d t h ( W po o l ) Ma x i m u m P o o l D e p t h ( D po o l ) Ba n k f u l l M e a n D e p t h ( D bk f ) Ba n k f u l l M a x i m u m D e p t h ( D ma x ) 31 . 3 Wi d t h / D e p t h R a t i o ( W bk f /D bk f ) En t r e n c h m e n t R a t i o ( W fp a /W bk f ) Wi d t h o f F l o o d p r o n e A r e a ( W fp a ) Ma x . D bk f / D bk f R a t i o Lo w B a n k H e i g h t / M a x . D bk f R a t i o 22 . 6 Ba n k f u l l W i d t h ( W bk f ) E/C 3/4 0.19 24.2 Di m e n s i o n V a r i a b l e s Dimension Variables4.7 245.1 Cg 5 / 6 0. 1 1 16 . 3 No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities Eg 5 0. 0 4 E/C 3/4Travis Creek Downstream Fc 5 245.14.7 Di m e n s i o n R a t i o s No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n of r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n of r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n of r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n o f r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s PR O P O S E D E/ C 3 / 4 0. 1 1 16 . 3 No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities Ta b l e 6 . M o r p h o l o g i c a l S t r e a m C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ( c o n t i n u e d Ay c o c k S p r i n g s R e s t o r a t i o n S i t e Me d : 3 7 . 2 M e d : 3 2 . 4 Me d : 3 1 M e d : 3 8 M e d : 1 1 1 Ra n g e : 2 5 - 6 9 R a n g e : 1 4 . 0 - 3 9 . 6 Ra n g e : 2 3 - 6 2 R a n g e : 2 8 - 7 5 R a n g e : 8 3 - 2 2 2 Me d : 6 8 . 4 M e d : 4 7 . 8 Me d : 6 6 M e d : 8 0 M e d : 2 3 6 Ra n g e : 4 4 - 1 1 6 R a n g e : 3 1 . 0 - 7 4 . 0 Ra n g e : 4 7 - 9 4 R a n g e : 5 6 - 1 1 3 R a n g e : 1 6 6 - 3 3 2 Me d : 2 2 . 8 M e d : 2 4 . 3 Me d : 3 1 M e d : 3 8 M e d : 1 1 1 Ra n g e : 2 0 - 3 8 R a n g e : 1 5 . 1 - 2 9 . 2 Ra n g e : 2 3 - 4 7 R a n g e : 2 8 - 5 6 R a n g e : 8 3 - 1 6 6 Me d : 1 6 . 5 M e d : 1 3 . 2 Me d : 2 3 M e d : 2 8 M e d : 8 3 Ra n g e : 1 1 - 2 7 R a n g e : 8 . 9 - 1 9 . 4 Ra n g e : 1 4 - 3 1 R a n g e : 1 7 - 3 8 R a n g e : 5 5 - 1 1 1 Si n u o s i t y ( S i n ) Po o l t o P o o l S p a c i n g / M e d : 4 . 6 M e d : 4 . 5 Me d : 4 . 0 M e d : 4 . 0 M e d : 4 . 0 B a n k f u l l W i d t h ( L p- p /W bk f ) Ra n g e : 3 . 1 - 8 . 4 R a n g e : 1 . 9 - 5 . 5 Ra n g e : 3 . 0 - 8 . 0 R a n g e : 3 . 0 - 8 . 0 R a n g e : 3 . 0 - 8 . 0 Me a n d e r L e n g t h / M e d : 8 . 4 M e d : 6 . 6 Me d : 8 . 5 M e d : 8 . 5 M e d : 8 . 5 B a n k f u l l W i d t h ( L m/W bk f ) Ra n g e : 5 . 5 - 1 4 . 3 R a n g e : 4 . 3 - 1 0 . 2 Ra n g e : 6 . 0 - 1 2 . 0 R a n g e : 6 . 0 - 1 2 . 0 R a n g e : 6 . 0 - 1 2 . 0 Me a n d e r W i d t h R a t i o M e d : 2 . 8 M e d : 3 . 4 Me d : 4 . 0 M e d : 4 . 0 M e d : 4 . 0 ( W be l t /W bk f ) Ra n g e : 2 . 4 - 4 . 7 R a n g e : 2 . 1 - 4 . 0 Ra n g e : 3 . 0 - 6 . 0 R a n g e : 3 . 0 - 6 . 0 R a n g e : 3 . 0 - 6 . 0 Ra d i u s o f C u r v a t u r e / M e d : 2 . 0 M e d : 1 . 8 Me d : 3 . 0 M e d : 3 . 0 M e d : 3 . 0 B a n k f u l l W i d t h ( R c / W bk f ) Ra n g e : 1 . 4 - 3 . 3 R a n g e : 1 . 2 - 2 . 7 Ra n g e : 1 . 8 - 4 . 0 R a n g e : 1 . 8 - 4 . 0 R a n g e : 2 . 0 - 4 . 0 Me a n : 0 . 0 3 1 6 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 8 3 Me a n : 0 . 0 4 1 6 M e a n : 0 . 0 1 6 7 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 4 1 Ra n g e : 0 . 0 1 - 0 . 0 5 7 6 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 1 5 4 Ra n g e : 0 . 0 2 7 7 - 0 . 0 6 4 7 R a n g e : 0 . 0 1 1 2 - 0 . 0 2 6 0 R a n g e : 0 . 0 0 2 8 - 0 . 0 0 6 4 Me a n : 0 . 0 0 0 7 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 0 2 Me a n : 0 . 0 0 1 2 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 0 5 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 0 1 Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 1 8 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 8 Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 1 6 2 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 0 6 5 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 0 1 6 Me a n : 0 . 0 3 5 3 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 2 0 Me a n : 0 . 0 0 9 2 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 3 7 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 0 9 Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 3 5 6 5 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 0 5 3 Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 1 8 5 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 0 7 4 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 0 1 8 Me a n : 0 . 0 0 2 9 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 0 9 Me a n : 0 . 0 0 2 5 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 1 0 M e a n : 0 . 0 0 0 3 Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 4 3 1 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 0 4 0 Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 1 8 5 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 0 7 4 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 0 0 1 8 Ri f f l e S l o p e / W a t e r S u r f a c e M e a n : 1 . 2 M e a n : 2 . 4 6 Me a n : 1 . 8 0 M e a n : 1 . 8 0 M e a n : 1 . 8 0 S l o p e ( S ri f f l e /S av e ) Ra n g e : 0 . 3 9 - 2 . 2 3 R a n g e : 0 - 3 . 0 8 Ra n g e : 1 . 2 - 2 . 8 R a n g e : 1 . 2 - 2 . 8 R a n g e : 1 . 2 - 2 . 8 Po o l S l o p e / W a t e r S u r f a c e M e a n : 0 . 0 M e a n : 0 . 0 4 Me a n : 0 . 0 5 M e a n : 0 . 0 5 M e a n : 0 . 0 5 S l o p e ( S po o l /S av e ) Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 7 0 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 1 6 Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 7 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 7 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 7 Ru n S l o p e / W a t e r S u r f a c e M e a n : 1 . 3 7 M e a n : 0 . 4 4 Me a n : 0 . 4 0 M e a n : 0 . 4 0 M e a n : 0 . 4 0 S l o p e ( S ru n /S av e ) Ra n g e : 0 - 1 3 . 8 2 R a n g e : 0 - 1 . 0 6 Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 8 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 8 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 8 Gl i d e S l o p e / W a t e r S u r f a c e M e a n : 0 . 1 1 M e a n : 0 . 1 8 Me a n : 0 . 1 1 M e a n : 0 . 1 1 M e a n : 0 . 1 1 S l o p e ( S gl i d e /S av e ) Ra n g e : 0 - 1 . 6 7 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 8 Ra n g e : 0 - 0 . 8 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 8 R a n g e : 0 - 0 . 8 * C r i p p l e C r e e k R e f e r e n c e i n c l u d e s m e a s u r e m e n t s f r o m a R e f e r e n ce S i t e m e a s u r e d i n 2 0 0 9 . 0.0093 Av e r a g e W a t e r S u r f a c e S l o p e ( S av e ) 0. 0 3 1 0 0.0093 0.0102 Ex i s t i n g U T 4 Be l t W i d t h ( W be l t ) 1. 2 2 Po o l t o P o o l S p a c i n g ( L p- p ) 1. 2 0 Ra d i u s o f C u r v a t u r e ( R c) RE F E R E N C E - CE D A R O C K P A R K RE F E R E N C E - C R I P P L E * CR E E K Me a n d e r L e n g t h ( L m) Pa t t e r n V a r i a b l e s PROPOSED No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities 1.05 0.00241.10 No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n of r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s Ex i s t i n g U T 1 a n d 2 E x i s t i n g U T 3 Travis Creek Downstream 1.10 Pr o f i l e V a r i a b l e s 0. 0 1 4 0 - 0 . 0 3 6 8 0. 0 1 2 7 - 0 . 0 3 3 5 NA1.05 Pr o f i l e V a r i a b l e s Pa t t e r n R a t i o s Va r i a b l e s 0. 0 1 3 7 - 0 . 0 3 6 1 Pr o f i l e R a t i o s 0. 0 0 5 0 Ru n S l o p e ( S ru n ) Po o l S l o p e ( S po o l ) 0. 0 2 5 8 Gl i d e S l o p e ( S gl i d e ) 0. 0 0 6 1 Ri f f l e S l o p e ( S ri f f l e ) Va l l e y S l o p e ( S va l l e y ) 0.0023 0.0024 1. 1 0 Pr o f i l e R a t i o s No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n o f r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s 0.0102 No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n o f r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities 0. 0 1 5 5 1. 0 1 1. 0 2 No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n o f r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n of r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s PROPOSED PR O P O S E D Pa t t e r n V a r i a b l e s Pa t t e r n R a t i o s No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n o f r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n of r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s No d i s t i n c t r e p e t i t i v e p a t t e r n of r i f f l e s a n d p o o l s d u e t o st a i g h t e n i n g a c t i v i t i e s 0. 0 1 4 0 - 0 . 0 3 6 8 0. 0 1 5 3 Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 13 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 3.3 Channel Evolution Typically, in the Piedmont of North Carolina, bed and bank erosion leads to channel downcutting and evolution from a stable E-type channel into a G-type (gully) channel. Continued erosion eventually results in lateral extension of the G-type channel into an F-type (widened gully) channel. The F-type channel will continue to widen laterally until the channel is wide enough to support a stable C-type or E-type channel at a lower elevation so that the original floodplain is no longer subject to regular flooding. Site UT’s are subject to extensive trampling by livestock with little, to no deep rooted vegetation adjacent to the channels. Trampling has resulted in bank sloughing, shallowing and widening of the channels, and filling of the channels with unconsolidated sediment. This results in a channel that is not subject to extensive scour, or erosion and a classification as a degraded (Class III) channel. Other reaches are subject to bed erosion for short sections from channel instability. These reaches are classified as degraded and widened (Class IV) channels (Simon and Hupp 1986). 3.4 Valley Classification The Site is located within the alluvial valley of Travis Creek with an average 250-foot floodplain valley width. The slopes descending to Travis Creek are dissected by smaller alluvial valleys with floodplains ranging from approximately 40 to 150 feet. Valley slopes are typical for the Piedmont region and range from 0.0024 for Travis Creek up to 0.0368 in the upper reaches of UT1. Typical streams in this region include C- and E-type streams with slightly entrenched, meandering channels with a riffle-pool sequence. Steeper sections of the Site are characterized by short isolated lengths of Eb-type step-pool channels. 3.5 Discharge This hydrophysiographic region is characterized by moderate rainfall with precipitation averaging approximately 40-50 inches per year (USDA 1960). Drainage basin sizes range from 0.04-square mile for UT 2 to 4.7-square miles for Travis Creek at the Site outfall. The Site’s discharge is dominated by a combination of upstream basin catchment, groundwater flow, and precipitation. Based on regional curves (Harman et al. 1999), the bankfull discharge for a 0.04-square mile watershed and a 4.7-square mile watershed is expected to average 8.7 cubic feet per second and 272 cubic feet per second, respectively. Bankfull discharge is expected to occur on average once per year. 3.6 Channel Stability Assessment 3.6.1 Stream Power Stability of a stream refers to its ability to adjust itself to inflowing water a nd sediment load. One form of instability occurs when a stream is unable to transport its sediment load, leading to aggradation, or deposition of sediment onto the stream bed. Conversely, when the ability of the stream to transport sediment exceeds the availability of sediments entering a reach, and/or stability thresholds for materials forming the channel boundary are exceeded, erosion or degradation occurs. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 14 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Stream power is the measure of a stream’s capacity to move sediment over time. Stream power can be used to evaluate the longitudinal profile, channel pattern, bed form, and sediment transport of streams. Stream power may be measured over a stream reach (total stream power) or per unit of channel bed area. The total stream power equation is defined as:  = gQs where  = total stream power (ft-lb/s-ft),  = density of water (lb/ft3), g = gravitational acceleration (ft/s2), Q = discharge (ft3/sec), and s = energy slope (ft/ft). The specific weight of water ( = 62.4 lb/ft3) is equal to the product of water density and gravitational acceleration, g. A general evaluation of power for a particular reach can be calculated using bankfull discharge and water surface slope for the reach. As slopes become steeper and/or velocities increase, stream power increases and more energy is available for reworking channel materials. Straightening and clearing channels increases slope and velocity and thus stream power. Alterations to the stream channel may conversely decrease stream power. In particular, over-widening of a channel will dissipate energy of flow over a larger area. This process will decrease stream power, allowing sediment to fall out of the water column, possibly leading to aggradation of the stream bed. The relationship between a channel and its floodplain is also important in determining stream power. Streams that remain within their banks at high flows tend to have higher stream power and relatively coarser bed materials. In comparison, streams that flood over their banks onto adjacent floodplains have lower stream power, transport finer sediments, and are more stable. Stream power assessments can be useful in evaluating sediment discharge within a stream and the deposition or erosion of sediments from the stream bed. 3.6.2 Shear Stress Shear stress, expressed as force per unit area, is a measure of the frictional force that flowing water exerts on a streambed. Shear stress and sediment entrainment are affected by sediment supply (size and amount), energy distribution within the channel, and frictional resistance of the stream bed and bank on water within the channel. These variables ultimately determine the ability of a stream to efficiently transport bedload and suspended sediment. For flow that is steady and uniform, the average boundary shear stress exerted by water on the bed is defined as follows:  =  Rs where  = shear stress (lb/ft2),  = specific weight of water, R = hydraulic radius (ft), and s = the energy slope (ft/ft). Shear stress calculated in this way is a spatial average and does not necessarily provide a good estimate of bed shear at any particular point. Adjustments to account for local variability and instantaneous values higher than the mean value can be applied based on channel form and irregularity. For a straight channel, the maximum shear stress can be assumed from the following equation: max = 1.5 Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 15 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina for sinuous channels, the maximum shear stress can be determined as a function of plan form characteristics: max = 2.65(Rc /Wbkf)-0.5 where Rc = radius of curvature (ft) and Wbkf = bankfull width (ft). Shear stress represents a difficult variable to predict due to variability of channel slope, dimension, and pattern. Typically, as valley slope decreases channel depth and sinuosity increase to maintain adequate shear stress values for bedload transport. Channels that have higher shear stress values than required for bedload transport will scour bed and bank materials, resulting in channel degradation. Channels with lower shear stress values than needed for bedload transport will deposit sediment, resulting in channel aggradation. The actual amount of work accomplished by a stream per unit of bed area depends on the available power divided by the resistance offered by the channel sediments, plan form, and vegetation. The stream power equation can thus be written as follows:  = gQs = v where  = stream power per unit of bed area (N/ft-sec, Joules/sec/ft2),  = shear stress, and v = average velocity (ft/sec). Similarly,  = /Wbkf where Wbkf = width of stream at bankfull (ft). 3.6.3 Stream Power and Shear Stress Methods and Results Channel degradation or aggradation occurs when hydraulic forces exceed or do not approach the resisting forces in the channel. The amount of degradation or aggradation is a function of relative magnitude of these forces over time. The interaction of flow within the boundary of open channels is only imperfectly understood. Adequate analytical expressions describing this interaction have yet to be developed for conditions in natural channels. Thus, means of characterizing these processes rely heavily upon empirical formulas. Traditional approaches for characterizing stability can be placed in one of two categories: 1) maximum permissible velocity and 2) tractive force, or stream power and shear stress. The former is advantageous in that velocity can be measured directly. Shear stress and stream power cannot be measured directly and must be computed from various flow parameters. However, stream power and shear stress are generally better measures of fluid force on the channel boundary than velocity. Using these equations, stream power and shear stress were estimated for 1) existing degraded reaches, 2) reference reaches, and 3) proposed Site conditions. Important input values and output results (including stream power, shear stress, and per unit shear power and shear stress) are Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 16 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina presented in Table 7. Average stream velocity and discharge va lues were calculated for the existing Site stream reaches, reference reach, and proposed conditions. Table 7. Stream Power () and Shear Stress () Values Discharge (ft3/s) Water surface Slope (ft/ft) Total Stream Power () /W Hydraulic Radius Shear Stress () Velocity (v)  v max Existing Conditions UT 1/2 16.3 0.0249 25.33 3.78 4.58 7.12 0.44 3.13 10.7 UT 3 7.8 0.0153 7.45 1.65 1.87 1.79 0.76 1.35 2.68 UT 4 24.2 0.0093 14.04 1.69 1.75 1.02 1.39 1.42 1.53 Travis Creek 245.1 0.0023 35.18 0.85 0.86 0.12 6.48 0.80 0.18 Reference Conditions Reference Reach-Cedarock 31.3 0.0258 50.39 6.22 0.82 1.33 3.91 5.19 1.99 Reference Cripple Creek 22.6 0.005 7.05 1.53 0.87 0.27 3.83 1.04 0.41 Proposed Conditions UTs 1, 2, 3 16.3 0.0231 23.5 3.01 0.48 0.69 3.79 2.61 1.03 UT 4 24.2 0.0093 14.04 1.49 0.58 0.34 3.84 1.30 0.51 Travis Creek 245.1 0.0023 35.18 1.27 1.73 0.25 4.46 1.11 0.37 In order to maintain sediment transport functions of a stable stream system, the proposed channel should exhibit stream power and shear stress values so the channel is neither aggrading nor degrading. Results of the analysis indicate the proposed channel reaches are expected to maintain stream power as a function of width values of approximately 1.27-3.01 and shear stress values of approximately 0.25-0.69 (comparable to that of the Cripple Creek reference reach, which most closely resembles the Site). Cedarock reference reach values for stream power and shear stress, as well as valley and water surface slopes are comparable to values for UT 1, 2, and 3. Cripple Creek reference reach values for stream power and shear stress are slightly lower due to flatter valley and water surface slopes and are comparable to values for UT 4. Existing, preconstruction Site streams are not characterized by excessive scour or erosion, and impacts are due primarily to removal of stream bed material (reduction in channel roughness) and livestock trampling. Stream power values of existing streams are not elevated as evidenced by minimal channel erosion at the Site. Stream power values of existing streams are comparable to reference reaches, residing between the Cedarock and Cripple Creek. Therefore, proposed stream power values should not be considerably different from existing values and should remain between reference reach values. Proposed stream power and shear values provide confirmation that sediment will be mobilized and transported through the Site without aggradation, or erosion on proposed stream banks. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 17 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Project UTs are headwater systems characterized by forested, or impounded watersheds. These channels are not expected to be characterized by high sediment supply and based on stream power and shear stress values in Table 7 the channels will adequately move sediment entering each reach. Travis Creek is primarily characterized by enhancement Level II measures, with short sections of restoration. The maintenance of channel dimension and slope are expected to consistently move sediment that enters the reach. 3.7 Bankfull Verification Discharge estimates for the Site utilize an assumed definition of “bankfull” and the return interval associated with that bankfull discharge. For this study, the bankfull channel is defined as the channel dimensions designed to support the “channel forming” or “dominant” discharge (Gordon et al. 1992). Based on available Piedmont regional curves, the bankfull discharge for the reference reaches averages approximately 28.8 and 24.8 cubic feet per second (cfs) for Cedarock and Cripple Creek, respectively (Harmen et al. 1999). The USGS regional regression equation for the Piedmont region indicates that bankfull discharge for the reference reaches at a 1.3-1.5 year return interval average approximately 27-32 and 10-15 cfs, respectively (USGS 2006). The manning formula (Manning’s equation) was also utilized to calculate bankfull discharge, which predicted a discharge of approximately 30.2 and 10.8, which is similar to other methods of calculating discharge. Table 8. Reference Reach Bankfull Discharge Analysis Aycock Springs Restoration Site Method Watershed Area (square miles) Return Interval (years) Discharge (cfs) Cedarock Reference Reach Piedmont Regional Curves (Harman et al. 1999) 0.2 1.3-1.5 28.8 Peidmont Regional Regression Model (USGS 2004) 0.2 1.3-1.5 27-32 Field Indicators of Bankfull 0.2 1.3-1.5 31.3 Manning's Equation 0.2 1.3-1.5 30.2 Cripple Creek Reference Reach Piedmont Regional Curves (Harman et al. 1999) 0.17 1.3-1.5 24.8 Peidmont Regional Regression Model (USGS 2004) 0.17 1.3-1.5 10-15 Field Indicators of Bankfull 0.17 1.3-1.5 22.6 Manning's Equation 0.17 1.3-1.5 10.8 Field indicators of bankfull, primarily topographic breaks identified on the banks, and riffle cross- sections were utilized to obtain an average bankfull cross-sectional area for the reference reaches. The Piedmont regional curves were then utilized to plot the wat ershed area and discharge for the reference reach cross-sectional area. Field indicators of bankfull approximate an average Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 18 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina discharge of 31.3 and 22.6 cfs, respectively for the reference reaches, which is 109 and 91 percent of that predicted by the regional curves. Based on the above analysis of methods to determine bankfull discharge, proposed conditions at the Site will be based on bankfull indicators found on the reference reaches and most importantly onsite indicators of bankfull. Based on field indicators of bankfull in relatively undisturbed reaches and the Cripple Creek Reference Reach (91 percent of the curves), which closely resembles on-Site conditions, the designed onsite channel restoration area will equal approximately 90 percent of the channel size indicated by Piedmont regional curves. Table 8 summarizes all methods analyzed for estimating bankfull discharge. 4.0 REFERENCE STREAMS Two reference reaches were identified for the Site. The first reference stream (Cedarock) is located approximately 5 miles north of the Site in Cedarock Park on an unnamed tributary to Rock Creek (Figures 2 and 5A-5C, Appendix A). The second reference stream (Cripple Creek) is located less than 8 miles east of the Site, south of Deep Creek Church Road on unnamed tributaries to the Haw River (Figure 2, Appendix A). The Cripple Creek reference was measured in 2009 as a reference reach for the Cripple Creek Stream Mitigation Bank, which is a successful project through four years of monitoring with no issues. The streams were measured and classified by stream type (Rosgen 1996). Travis Creek is primarily proposed for stream enhancement Level II treatments including spot treatment for bank stabilization. Two reaches of Travis Creek are proposed for restoration, one is the relief of a tight meander bend encompassing approximately 209 linear feet in length (one outer bend), and the other includes tying the channel into historic, abandoned channel reaches at the downstream extent of the project encompassing approximately 664 linear feet (six outer bends). Reference for Travis Creek includes cross sections along the on-site, enhancement reaches to determine proposed cross sectional area, pattern, and slope. 4.1 Channel Classification The reference reaches are both characterized as E-type streams; however, Cedarock is significantly steeper (Eb-type) and is characterized by moderate sinuosity (1.2). Cripple Creek has slightly higher sinuosity, due to a lower valley slope. Both channels are dominated by gravel substrate. E-type streams are characterized as slightly entrenched, riffle-pool channels exhibiting high sinuosity (1.3 to greater than 1.5); however, reference streams in the region typically are characterized by sinuosities slightly lower than 1.3. E-type streams typically exhibit a sequence of riffles and pools associated with a sinuous flow pattern. In North Carolina, E-type streams often occur in narrow to wide valleys with well-developed alluvial floodplains. E-type channels are typically considered stable; however, these streams are sensitive to upstream drainage basin changes and/or channel disturbance, and may rapidly convert to other stream types. 4.2 Discharge Based on an analysis of bankfull discharge, proposed conditions at the Site will be based on 90 percent of Piedmont regional curves (see Section 3.7 Bankfull Verification). Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 19 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 4.3 Channel Morphology Dimension: Data collected at Cedarock and Cripple Creek indicate bankfull cross-sectional areas of 8.0 and 5.9 square feet, respectively. Cedarock was slightly larger than predicted by regional curves (7.5 square feet) and Cripple Creek was slightly smaller than predicted by regional curves (6.5 square feet). However, both streams are within a reasonable deviation from predictions by regional curve calculations and adequately verify the use of regional curves at the Site. Cedarock and Cripple Creek exhibit a bankfull width of 8.1 and 4.6, a bankfull depth of 0.8 and 1.1 feet, and width-to-depth ratios of 10.1 and 4.2, respectively (see Table 6, Morphological Stream Characteristics). Figures 5A-5C (Appendix A) provide plan view and cross-sectional data for the Cedarock reference reach. The reference reaches exhibit a bank-height ratio of 1.0 and 1.3, respectively. Pattern and Profile: In-field measurements of the reference reaches have yielded an average sinuosity of 1.2 at Cedarock and 1.22 at Cripple Creek (thalweg distance/straight-line distance). Onsite valley slopes range from 0.0024 in Travis Creek to 0.0102-0.0368 in the UTs at the Site. Valley slopes exhibited by reference channels range from 0.0310 at Cedarock to 0.0061 at Cripple Creek, providing a good range of slopes to compare existing and proposed Site conditions. Substrate: Reference channels are characterized by substrate dominated by gravel-sized particles. 5.0 PROJECT SITE WETLANDS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) 5.1 Existing Jurisdictional Wetlands Jurisdictional wetlands within the Site were delineated in the field following guidelines set forth in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and subsequent regional supplements, and located using GPS technology with reported submeter accuracy (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Jurisdictional delineations were approved by David Bailey of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) during a field visit on May 29, 2014 (Appendix D). Approval documentation for the delineation, dated September 16, 2004 is included in Appendix D. Existing jurisdictional wetlands are depicted in Pink on Figure 4 (Appendix A). 5.2 Hydrological Characterization Construction activities are expected to restore groundwater hydrology to approximately 0.5 acre of drained, or otherwise impacted riparian hydric soils and enhance 1.5 acres of cleared riparian wetlands. Areas of the Site targeted for riparian wetlands will receive hydrological inputs from periodic overbank flooding of restored tributaries, groundwater migration into the wetlands, upland/stormwater runoff, and, to a lesser extent, direct precipitation. Hydrological impairment of drained soils has resulted from lateral draw-down of the water table adjacent to existing, incised stream channels and/or compaction of surficial soils to the extent that percolation of hydrology to the groundwater table is hindered. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 20 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 5.3 Soil Characterization 5.3.1 Taxonomic Classification Detailed soil mapping conducted by a North Carolina Licensed So il Scientist (NCLSS) in October 2013 indicate that 2.3 acres of the Site is currently underlain by hydric soils of the Worsham Series and Mixed Alluvial Land, Poorly Drained (Figure 4, Appendix A). Onsite hydric soils are grey to gley in color and are compacted and pockmarked by livestock trampling. Livestock trampling, grazing, and annual mowing for harvest of hay has resulted in an herbaceous vegetative community. Groundwater springs and surface runoff contribute hydrology to these areas, although the dominant hydrological influence is the lateral draw-down of the water table adjacent to incised stream channels. A detailed soil profile conducted by a NCLSS is as follows; 5.3.2 Profile Description Soil Profile 0 to 3 inches; (10YR 4/2) silt loam 3 to 5 inches; (10YR 5/4) sandy clay loam, faint brown (10YR 4/2) mottles, extensive rhizospheres 5 to 9 inches; (10YR 5/2) sandy clay loam, common medium brownish to red (10YR 4/4) mottles 9 to 18 inches; (10YR 5/2) clay, common medium brownish to red (10YR 4/4) mottles 18 + inches; (10YR 5/1) clay, few distinct low chroma (10YR 5/3) mottles 5.4 Plant Community Characterization Areas proposed for wetland re-establishment and enhancement are primarily vegetated by fescue and opportunistic herbaceous species with very little vegetative diversity. 6.0 Reference Forest Ecosystem A Reference Forest Ecosystem (RFE) is a forested area on which to model restoration efforts at the Site in relation to soils and vegetation. RFEs should be ecologically stable climax communities and should be a representative model of the Site forested ecosystem as it likely existed prior to human disturbances. Data describing plant community composition and structure should be collected at the RFEs and subsequently applied as reference data in an attempt to emulate a natural climax community. The RFE for this project is located on the west and south banks of Travis Creek in areas undisturbed by land clearing and agriculture. The RFE supports plant community and landform characteristics that restoration efforts will attempt to emulate. Tree and shrub species identified Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 21 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina within the reference forest and outlined in Table 9 will be used, in addition to other relevant species in appropriate Schafale and Weakley (1990) community descriptions. Table 9. Reference Forest Ecosystem Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest red maple (Acer rubrum) pignut hickory (Carya glabra) green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) black cherry (Prunus serotina) white oak (Quercus alba) swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii) water oak (Quercus nigra) cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda) willow oak (Quercus phellos) slippery elm (Ulmus rubra) American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) winged elm (Ulmus alata) American holly (Ilex opaca) dogwood (Cornus florida) 7.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN 7.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives Based on the Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities Report 2009 (NCEEP 2009) and the Little Alamance, Travis, & Tickle Creek Watersheds Restoration Plan (PTCOG 2008), Targeted Local Watershed 03030002030010 is not meeting its designated use of supporting aquatic life. Agricultural land use appears to be the main source of stress in the Hydrologic Unit, as well as land clearing and poor riparian management. This project will meet goals of the Local Watershed Plan including 1) reduce sediment loading, 2) reduce nutrient loading, 3) manage stormwater runoff, 4) reduce toxic inputs, 5) provide and improve instream habitat, 6) provide and improve terrestrial habitat, 7) improve stream stability, and 8) improve hydrologic function. The following six goals were identified by the Stakeholder group of the Travis, Tickle, Little Alamance LWP Phase I assessment which address the water quality impacts and watershed needs in all of the Little Alamance, Travis, Tickle watersheds in 2006. 1) Increase local government awareness of the impacts of urban growth on water resources; 2) Strengthen watershed protection standards; 3) Improve water quality through stormwater management; 4) Identify and rank parcels for retrofits, stream repair, preservation, and/or conservation; 5) Assess aquatic health to identify stressors that are the most likely causes of poor biological conditions; 6) Meet requirements of outside funding sources for implementation of projects. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 22 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina The eight priority goals of the Travis, Tickle, Little Alamance LWP include the following. 1) reduce sediment loading; 2) reduce nutrient loading; 3) manage stormwater runoff; 4) reduce toxic inputs; 5) provide and improve instream habitat; 6) provide and improve terrestrial habitat; 7) improve stream stability; and 8) improve hydrologic function. Site activities include the restoration of perennial and intermittent stream channels, enhancement (level II) of perennial stream channels, and re-establishment of riparian wetlands. The following table summarizes the project goals/objectives and proposed functional uplift based on proposed restoration activities and observations of two reference areas located in the vicinity of the Site. Goals and objectives target functional uplift identified in the Travis, Tickle, Little Alamance LWP and based stream/wetland functional assessments developed by the regulatory agencies. Table 10. Project Goals and Objectives Project Goal/Objective How Goal/Objective will be Accomplished Improve Hydrology Restore Floodplain Access Building a new channel at the historic floodplain elevation to restore overbank flows Restore Wooded Riparian Buffer Planting a woody riparian buffer Restore Stream Stability Providing proper channel width and depth, stabilizing channel banks, providing gravel/cobble substrate, planting a woody riparian buffer, and removing cattle Improve Sediment Transport to Convert the UT’s from Sand/Silt Dominated to Gravel/Cobble Dominated Streams Improve Stream Geomorphology Increase Surface Storage and Retention Building a new channel at the historic floodplain elevation restoring overbank flows, removing cattle, scarifying compacted soils, and planting woody vegetation Restore Appropriate Inundation/Duration Increase Subsurface Storage and Retention Raising the stream bed elevation and rip compacted soils Improve Water Quality Increase Upland Pollutant Filtration Planting a native, woody riparian buffer Increase Thermoregulation Planting a native, woody riparian buffer Reduce Stressors and Sources of Pollution Removing cattle and other agricultural inputs Increase Removal and Retention of Pathogens, Particulates (Sediments), Dissolved Materials (Nutrients), and Toxins from the Water Column Raising the stream bed elevation, restoring overbank flows, planting with woody vegetation, removing cattle, increasing surface storage a nd retention, and restoring appropriate inundation/duration Increase Energy Dissipation of Overbank/Overland Flows/Stormwater Runoff Raising the stream bed elevation, restoring overbank flows, and planting with woody vegetation Restore Habitat Restore In-stream Habitat Building a stable channel with a cobble/gravel bed and planting a woody riparian buffer Restore Stream-side Habitat Planting a woody riparian buffer Improve Vegetation Composition and Structure Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 23 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Restoration and protection of aquatic resources with a conservation easement will result in net gains in hydrology, water quality, and habitat functions at the Site. A summary of mitigation activities includes the following.  Providing a minimum of 3628 SMUs, as calculated in accordance with the requirements stipulated in RFP #16-005568. o Restoring approximately 3357 linear feet of stream channel through construction of stable stream channels in the historic floodplain location and elevation. o Enhancing (Level II) approximately 677 linear feet of stream channel by ceasing current land use practices, removing invasive species, spot treating stressed banks with willow stakes and brush mattresses, and planting with native forest vegetation.  Providing a minimum of 0.5 riparian WMUs, as calculated in accordance with the requirements stipulated in RFP #16-005568. o Restoring 0.5 acre of riparian wetland by removing livestock, restoring compacted soils, raising stream channels to historic elevations, and rehydrating floodplain soils. o Enhancing an additional 1.5 acres of riparian wetland.  Removing cattle from the Site and fencing the entire conservation easement.  Revegetating wetlands, floodplains, and slopes adjacent to restored streams.  Protecting the Site in perpetuity with a conservation easement. 7.2 Stream Design Onsite streams targeted for restoration have endured significant disturbance from land use activities such as land clearing, livestock grazing, and other anthropogenic maintenance. Site streams will be restored to emulate historic conditions at the Site utilizing parameters from nearby, relatively undisturbed reference streams (see Section 4.0 Reference Streams). 7.2.1 Designed Channel Classification The proposed channel has been designed to emulate parameters of the relatively undisturbed reference streams (see Table 6 Morphological Stream Characteristics). Proposed channels are expected to be characterized by sand, gravel, and cobble substrate similar to reference streams, which emulate historic Site conditions. 7.2.2 Target Wetland Communities/Buffer Communities Onsite wetland and buffer areas targeted for re-establishment and enhancement have endured significant disturbance from land use activities such as land clearing, livestock grazing, and other anthropogenic maintenance. These areas will be planted with native forest species typical of wetland and buffer communities in the region such as those found within the reference forest (see Section 6.0 Reference Forest Ecosystem). Emphasis will focus on developing a diverse plant assemblage. 7.3 Stream Restoration Stream restoration efforts depicted in Figures 6A-6C (Appendix A) are designed to restore stable streams that approximate hydrodynamics, stream geometry, and local microtopography relative to reference conditions. Restoration at the Site will be Priority I restoration; therefore, bankfull elevations will be raised to meet the adjacent valley floodplain elevation. The farthest downstream Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 24 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina reach of Travis Creek will be restored through a mixture of Priority I and Priority II restoration. This reach will be routed to a historic channel identified in the floodplain. Belt-width Preparation and Grading Stream restoration is expected to entail 1) belt-width preparation, 2) channel excavation, 3) spoil stockpiling, 4) channel stabilization, 5) channel diversion, and 6) channel backfill. Belt-width corridor preparation will entail channel staking, floodplain clearing and grubbing, and any necessary grading prior to channel excavation. After the floodplain has been prepped, the proposed design channel will be staked and/or clearly marked to the design parameters. Spoil material excavated during floodplain grading will be stockpiled adjacent to the existing channels. After construction of the new channel is complete, existing channels will be abandoned and backfilled with stockpiled soils. Grading of topsoil at the Site is expected to be minimal; however, where grading is necessary, topsoils will be stockpiled, managed, and reapplied after grading is complete. Once belt-width corridor preparation is complete, the proposed channel will be excavated to the average width, depth, and cross-sectional area derived from reference reach studies and detailed measurements of the onsite reach (Figure 7, Appendix A). Stream banks and the belt-width area of constructed channels will be planted with shrub and herbaceous vegetation. Root mats may also be selectively removed from adjacent areas and placed as erosion control features on channel banks. Once the proposed design channel has been excavated and stabilized, abandoned channels will be backfilled utilizing spoil material stockpiled from channel excavation and/or from suitable material excavated from the Site, or adjacent to the Site. Abandoned channels will be backfilled to the maximum extent feasible. In-stream Structures The use of in-stream structures for grade control and habitat is essential for successful stream restoration (Figure 8A, Appendix A). In-stream structures may be placed in the channel to elevate local water surface profiles in the channel, potentially flattening the water energy slope or gradient. The structures would likely consist of log/rock cross-vanes or log/rock j-hook vanes designed primarily to direct stream energy into the center of the channel and away from banks. In addition, the structures would be placed in relatively straight reaches to provide secondary (perpendicular) flow cells during bankfull events. Piped Channel Crossings Landowner constraints will necessitate the installation of piped channel crossings within breaks in the easement to allow access to portions of the property isolated by stream restoration activities (Figures 6A-6C, Appendix A). The crossings will be constructed of properly sized pipes and hydraulically stable rip-rap or suitable rock. Crossings will be large enough to handle the weight of anticipated vehicular traffic. Approach grades to the crossing will be at an approximate 10:1 slope and constructed of hard, scour-resistant crushed rock or other permeable material, which is free of fines. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 25 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Outfall Structures Drop structures are proposed at confluence of the UTs with Travis Creek. The locations of proposed drop structures are depicted on Figures 6A-6C (Appendix A). The drop structures may be constructed out of TerraCell, or large cobble depending upon anticipated scour from the restored stream channels (Figure 8B, Appendix A). The structures should be constructed to resist erosive forces associated with hydraulic drops proposed at the Site. TerraCell is a light weight, flexible mat made of high density polyethylene strips. The strips are bonded together to form a honeycomb configuration. The honeycomb mat is fixed in place and filled with gravel or sand. Material in the TerraCell structure may be planted with grasses and shrubs for additional erosion protection. The TerraCell structure will form a nickpoint that approximates geologic controls in stream beds. 7.4 Stream Enhancement (Level II) Stream enhancement (level II) will occur along Travis Creek in areas depicted on Figures 6A and 6B (Appendix A). Stream enhancement will entail the cessation of current land management practices, invasive species control (predominantly Chinese privet), bank treatments including willow staking and brush mattress installation (Figure 8B, Appendix A), and planting riparian buffers with native forest vegetation. Riparian buffers will extend a minimum of 50 feet from the top of stream banks to facilitate stream recovery a nd prevent further degradation of the stream. 7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis Existing Site reaches are characterized by sand and silt substrate as the result of channel impacts including livestock trampling and riparian vegetation removal. Due to headwaters being dammed and/or originating onsite, sediment supply from upstream sources is not expected to overwhelm the Site. UT 4 and UT 3 are expected to be sediment starved from upstream impoundments; therefore, adequate sized channel bed material will be required as part of stream restoration activities. UT 2 originates onsite and adequate buffering of the headwaters will occur to alleviate excessive sediment inputs that would overwhelm and aggrade the channel. UT 1 is the only stream that originates offsite and enters the project unimpeded. The channel has been classified as intermittent in the upper reaches and scour upstream of the Site is not expected to be significant. The upstream reach is forested with natural substrate free of excessive fines; therefore, pulses of fine materials from upstream are not expected to infiltrate UT 1. Stream stability assessments include calculations of stream power and shear stress to compare 1) existing dredged and straightened reaches, 2) Cedarock Reference Reach, 3) Cripple Creek Reference Reach, and 4) proposed Site conditions are discussed in Section 3.6 (Channel Stability Assessment). 7.6 HEC RAS Analysis The HEC-RAS analysis has been completed for Site restoration activities. This analysis is discussed in more detail in Section 2.6.4 (FEMA/Hydrological Trespass). Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 26 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 7.7 Hydrological Modifications (Wetland Re-Establishment and Enhancement) Areas proposed for wetland re-establishment are designed to restore a fully functioning wetland system, which will provide surface water storage, nutrient cycling, removal of imported elements and compounds, and will create a variety and abundance of wildlife habitat. Portions of the Site underlain by hydric soils have been impacted by channel incision, vegetative clearing, channel manipulation, and earth movement associated with agricultural practices. Wetland re- establishment will focus on the restoration of vegetative communities, the reestablishment of soil structure and microtopographic variations, and redirecting normal surface hydrology back to Site floodplains. These activities will result in the re-establishment of 0.5 acre of riparian wetland and enhancement of 1.5 acre of riparian wetland (Figure 6A-6C, Appendix A). Reestablishment of Historic Groundwater Elevations Hydric soils adjacent to incised channels have been drained due to lowering of the groundwater table and a lateral drainage effect from existing stream reaches. Reestablishment of channel inverts is expected to rehydrate soils adjacent to Site streams, result ing in the re-establishment of jurisdictional hydrology to riparian wetlands. Reestablishment of Soil Structure Soil structure throughout the Site, particularly within wetland areas, will be reestablished to allow for penetration of rain water to the groundwater table. This w ill be accomplished by removing livestock from the Site, ripping compacted soils, and revegetating the Site. Hydrophytic Vegetation Site wetland areas targeted for re-establishment and enhancement have endured significant disturbance from land use activities such as land clearing, livestock grazing, and other anthropogenic maintenance. Wetland areas will be revegetated with native vegetation typical of wetland communities in the region. Emphasis will focus on developing a diverse plant assemblage. Section 7.9 (Natural Plant Community Restoration) provides detailed information concerning community species associations. Reconstruction of Stream Corridors The stream restoration plan involves the reconstruction of Site streams in place, or on new location. Existing channels will be backfilled so that water tables may be restored to historic conditions. Wetlands located utilizing a GPS with reported sub-meter accuracy have been plotted on plan sheets and have been avoided to the maximum extent feasible. Some in-channel wetlands will be affected by channel reconstruction; however, a net gain in wetlands from 1.5 acres to 2.0 acres will be realized from the project. 7.8 Soil Restoration Soil grading will occur during stream restoration activities. Topsoils will be stockpiled during construction activities and will be spread on the soil surface once critical subgrade has been established. The replaced topsoil will serve as a viable growing medium for community restoration to provide nutrients and aid in the survival of planted species. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 27 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 7.9 Natural Plant Community Restoration Restoration of floodplain forest and stream-side habitat allows for development and expansion of characteristic species across the landscape. Ecotonal changes between community types contribute to diversity and provide secondary benefits, such as enhanced feeding and nesting opportunities for mammals, birds, amphibians, and other wildlife. Reference Forest Ecosystem (RFE) data, onsite observations, and community descriptions from Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley 1990) were used to develop the primary plant community associations that will be promoted during community restoration activities. 7.9.1 Planting Plan Stream-side trees and shrubs include species with high value for sediment stabilization, rapid growth rate, and the ability to withstand hydraulic forces associated with bankfull flow and overbank flood events. Stream-side trees and shrubs will be planted within 15 feet of the channel throughout the meander belt-width. Shrub elements will be planted along the reconstructed stream banks, concentrated along outer bends. Piedmont Alluvial Forest is the target community for Site floodplains and Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest is the target community for upland side-slopes. Bare-root seedlings within the Piedmont Alluvial and Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forests will be planted at a density of approximately 680 stems per acre on 8-foot centers. Shrub species in the stream-side assemblage will be planted at a density of 2720 stems per acre on 4-foot centers. Table 11 depicts the total number of stems and species distribution within each vegetation association (Figure 9, Appendix A). Planting will be performed between December 1 and March 15 to allow plants to stabilize during the dormant period and set root during the spring season. 7.9.2 Nuisance Species Management Chinese privet and multiflora rose, located within wooded areas along Travis Creek, will be controlled mechanically and/or chemically, as part of this project. No other nuisance species controls are proposed at this time. Inspections for beaver and other potential nuisance species will occur throughout the course of the monitoring period. Appropriate actions may be taken to ameliorate any negative impacts regarding vegetation development and/or water management on an as-needed basis. The presences of nuisance species will be monitored over the course of the monitoring period. Appropriate actions will be taken to ameliorate any negative impacts regarding vegetation development and/or water management on an as-needed basis. Mi t i g a t i o n P l a n ( C o n t r a c t N o . 5 7 9 1 ) page 28 Ay c o c k S p r i n g s S t r e a m a n d W e t l a n d R e s t o r a t i o n S i t e R e s t o r a t i o n S y s t e m s , L L C Al a m a n c e C o u n t y , N o r t h C a r o l i n a Ta b l e 1 1 . P l a n t i n g P l a n Ve g e t a t i o n A s s o c i a t i o n Pi e d m o n t / L o w M o u n t a i n Al l u v i a l F o r e s t * Dr y - M e s i c O a k - H i c k o r y Fo r e s t * St r e a m - s i d e As s e m b l a g e * * T O T A L Ar e a ( a c r e s ) 4. 8 4. 3 2. 8 11.9 Sp e c i e s # p l a n t e d * % o f t o t a l # p l a n t e d * % o f t o t a l # pl a n t e d * * % o f t o t a l # p l a n t e d Ta g a l d e r ( Al n u s s e r r u l a t a ) - - - - - - - - 3 0 4 6 4 0 3 0 4 6 Ri v e r b i r c h ( Be t u l a n i g r a ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Ir o n w o o d ( Ca r p i n u s c a r o l i n i a n a ) -- -- 43 9 1 5 - - - - 4 3 9 Si l k y d o g w o o d ( Co r n u s a m o m u m ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - 1 5 2 3 2 0 1 8 4 9 Fl o w e r i n g d o g w o o d ( Co r n u s f l o r i d a ) - - - - 1 4 6 5 - - - - 1 4 6 Pe r s i m m o n ( Di o s p y r o s v i r g i n i a n a ) -- -- 14 6 5 - - - - 1 4 6 Wh i t e a s h ( Fr a x i n u s a m e r i c a n a ) -- -- 43 9 1 5 - - - - 4 3 9 Gr e e n a s h ( Fr a x i n u s p e n n s y l v a n i c a ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Tu l i p p o p l a r ( Li r i o d e n d r o n t u l i p i f e r a ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Sw a m p b l a c k g u m ( Ny s s a b i f l o r a ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Sy c a m o r e ( Pl a t a n u s o c c i d e n t a l i s ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Re d m a p l e ( Ac e r r u b r u m ) - - - - 4 3 9 1 5 - - - - 4 3 9 Wh i t e o a k ( Qu e r c u s a l b a ) -- - - 4 3 9 1 5 - - - - 4 3 9 Wa t e r o a k ( Qu e r c u s n i g r a ) 32 6 10 29 2 1 0 - - - - 6 1 8 Ch e r r y b a r k o a k ( Qu e r c u s p a g o d a ) 32 6 10 -- - - - - - - 3 2 6 Wi l l o w o a k ( Qu e r c u s p h e l l o s ) 3 2 6 1 0 2 9 2 1 0 - - - - 6 1 8 No r t h e r n r e d o a k ( Qu e r c u s r u b r a ) - - - - 2 9 2 1 0 - - - - 2 9 2 Bl a c k w i l l o w ( Sa l i x n i g r a ) - - - - - - - - 3 0 4 6 4 0 3 0 4 6 Am e r i c a n e l m ( Ul m u s a m e r i c a n a ) 32 6 10 -- - - - - - - 3 2 6 TO T A L 3 2 6 0 1 0 0 2 9 2 4 1 0 0 7 6 1 5 1 0 0 1 3 , 7 9 9 * P l a n t e d a t a d e n s i t y o f 6 8 0 s t e m s / a c r e . ** P l a n t e d a t a d e n s i t y o f 2 7 2 0 s t e m s / a c r e . Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 29 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 8.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Monitoring requirements and success criteria outlined in the latest guidance by NCEEP dated November 7, 2011 (Monitoring Requirements and Reporting Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation) will be followed and are briefly outlined below. Monitoring data collected at the Site should include reference photos, plant survival analysis, channel stability analysis, and biological data, if specifically required by permit conditions. Wetland hydrology is proposed to be monitored for a period of seven years (years 1-7). Riparian vegetation and stream morphology is proposed to be monitored for a period of seven years with measurements completed in years 1-3, year 5, and year 7. If monitoring demonstrates the Site is successful by year 5 and no concerns have been identified, Restoration Systems may propose to terminate monitoring at the Site and forego monitoring requirements for years 6 and 7. Early closure will only be provided through written approval from the USACE in consultation with the Interagency Review Team (NC IRT). Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc. Annual monitoring reports of the data collected will be submitted to the NCEEP by Restoration Systems no later than December 31 of each monitoring year data is collected. 8.1 Streams Annual monitoring will include development of channel cross-sections and substrate on riffles and pools. Data to be presented in graphic and tabular format will include 1) cross-sectional area, 2) bankfull width, 3) average depth, 4) maximum depth, and 5) width-to-depth ratio. Longitudinal profiles will not be measured routinely unless monitoring demon strates channel bank or bed instability, in which case, longitudinal profiles may be required by the USACE along reaches of concern to track changes and demonstrate stability. Visual assessment of in-stream structures will be conducted to determine if failure has occurred. Failure of a structure may be indicated by collapse of the structure, undermining of the structure, abandonment of the channel around the structure, and/or stream flow beneath the structure. In addition, visual assessments of the entire channel will be conducted in years 1-3, 5, and 7 of monitoring as outlined in NCEEP Monitoring Requirements and Reporting Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation. Areas of concern will be depicted on a plan view figure identifying the location of concern along with a written assessment and photograph of the area. 8.1.1 Stream Success Criteria Monitoring and success criteria for stream restoration should relate to project goals and objectives. From a mitigation perspective, several of the goals and objectives are assumed to be functionally elevated by restoration activities without direct measurement. Other goals and objectives will be considered successful upon achieving vegetation success criteria. The following summarizes stream success criteria related to goals and objectives. 8.1.2 Stream Contingency In the event that stream success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be implemented. Stream contingency may include, but may not be limited to 1) structure repair and/or installation; 2) repair of dimension, pattern, and/or profile variables; and 3) bank stabilization. The Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 30 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina method of contingency is expected to be dependent upon stream variables that are not in compliance with success criteria. Primary concerns, which may jeopardize stream success, include 1) structure failure, 2) headcut migration through the Site, and/or 3) bank erosion. Table 12. Stream Goals and Success Criteria Project Goal/Objective Stream Success Criteria Improve Hydrology Restore Floodplain Access Two overbank events in separate monitoring years will be documented during the monitoring period. Restore Wooded Riparian Buffer Attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1). Restore Stream Stability Cross-sections, monitored annually, will be compared to as- built measurements to determine channel stability and maintenance of channel geomorphology. Improve Stream Geomorphology Convert stream channels from unstable G- and F-type channels to stable E- and C- type stream channels. Increase Surface Storage and Retention Two overbank events in separate monitoring years, and attaining Wetland and Vegetation Success Criteria (Sections 8.2.1 and 8.3.1). Restore Appropriate Inundation/Duration Increase Subsurface Storage and Retention Two overbank events will be documented, in separate years, during the monitoring period and documentation of an elevated groundwater table (within 12 inches of the soil surface) for greater than 10 percent of the growing season during average climatic conditions. Improve Sediment Transport to Convert the UT’s from Sand/Silt Dominated to Gravel/Cobble Dominated Streams Pebble counts documenting coarsening of bed material from pre-existing conditions of sand and silt to post restoration conditions of gravel and cobble. Improve Water Quality Increase Upland Pollutant Filtration Attaining Wetland and Vegetation Success Criteria (Sections 8.2.1 and 8.3.1) Increase Thermoregulation Attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1). Reduce Stressors and Sources of Pollution Fencing maintained throughout the monitoring period and encroachment within the easement eliminated. Increase Removal and Retention of Pathogens, Particulates (Sediments), Dissolved Materials (Nutrients), and Toxins from the Water Column Removal of cattle, documentation of two overbank events in separate monitoring years, and attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1) Increase Energy Dissipation of Overbank/Overland Flows/Stormwater Runoff Documentation of two overbank events in separate monitoring years and attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1) Restore Habitat Restore In-stream Habitat Pebble counts documenting coarsening of bed material from pre-existing conditions of sand and silt to post restoration conditions of gravel and cobble, and attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1) Restore Stream-side Habitat Attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1) Improve Vegetation Composition and Structure Attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1) Structure Failure In the event that structures are compromised the affected structure will be repaired, maintained, or replaced. Once the structure is repaired or replaced, it must function to stabilize adjacent stream banks and/or maintain grade control within the channel. Structures which remain intact, but exhibit flow around, beneath, or through the header/footer will be repaired by excavating a trench on the upstream side of the structure and reinstalling filter fabric in front of the pilings. Structures which have been compromised, resulting in shifting or collapse of header/footer, will be removed and replaced with a structure suitable for Site flows. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 31 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Headcut Migration Through the Site In the event that a headcut occurs within the Site (identified visually or through measurements [i.e. bank-height ratios exceeding 1.4]), provisions for impeding headcut migration and repairing damage caused by the headcut will be implemented. Headcut migration may be impeded through the installation of in-stream grade control structures (rip-rap sill and/or log cross-vane weir) and/or restoring stream geometry variables until channel stability is achieved. Channel repairs to stream geometry may include channel backfill with coarse material and stabilizing the material with erosion control matting, vegetative transplants, and/or willow stakes. Bank Erosion In the event that severe bank erosion occurs within the Site, resulting in elevated width-to-depth ratios, contingency measures to reduce bank erosion and width-to-depth ratios will be implemented. Bank erosion contingency measures may include the installation of log-vane weirs and/or other bank stabilization measures. If the resultant bank erosion induces shoot cutoffs or channel abandonment, a channel may be excavated which will reduce shear stress to stable values. 8.2 Wetlands Two to three groundwater monitoring gauges will be installed to take measurements after hydrological modifications are performed at the Site. Hydrological sampling will continue throughout the growing season at intervals necessary to satisfy jurisdictional hydrology success criteria (USEPA 1990). In addition, an on-site rain gauge will document rainfall data for comparison of groundwater conditions with extended drought conditions and floodplain crest gauges will be installed to confirm overbank flooding events. 8.2.1 Wetland Success Criteria Monitoring and success criteria for wetland re-establishment should relate to project goals and objectives. From a mitigation perspective, several of the goals and objectives are assumed to be functionally elevated by restoration activities without direct measurement. Other goals and objectives will be considered successful upon achieving vegetation success criteria. The following summarizes wetland success criteria related to goals and objectives. According to the Soil Survey of Alamance County, the growing season for Alamance County is from April 17 – October 22 (USDA 1960). However, the start date for the growing season is not typical for the Piedmont region; therefore, for purposes of this project gauge hydrologic success will be determined using data from February 1 - October 22 to more accurately represent the period of biological activity. This will be confirmed annually by soil temperatures and/or bud burst. Target hydrological characteristics include saturation or inundation for 10 percent of the monitored period (February 1-October 22), during average climatic conditions. During years with atypical climatic conditions, groundwater gauges in reference wetlands may dictate threshold hydrology success criteria (75 percent of reference). These areas are expected to support hydrophytic vegetation. If wetland parameters are marginal as indicated by vegetation and/or hydrology monitoring, a jurisdictional determination will be performed. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 32 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Table 13. Wetland Goals and Success Criteria Project Goal/Objective Wetland Success Criteria Improve Hydrology Restore Wooded Riparian Buffer Attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1). Increase Surface Storage and Retention Two overbank events in separate monitoring years, and attaining Wetland and Vegetation Success Criteria (Sections 8.2.1 and 8.3.1). Restore Appropriate Inundation/Duration Increase Subsurface Storage and Retention Improve Water Quality Increase Upland Pollutant Filtration Attaining Wetland and Vegetation Success Criteria (Sections 8.2.1 and 8.3.1). Reduce Stressors and Sources of Pollution Fencing maintained throughout the monitoring period and encroachment within the easement eliminated. Increase Removal and Retention of Pathogens, Particulates (Sediments), Dissolved Materials (Nutrients), and Toxins from the Water Column Removal of cattle, documentation of two overbank events in separate monitoring years, and attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1). Increase Energy Dissipation of Overbank/Overland Flows/Stormwater Runoff Documentation of two overbank events in separate monitoring years, and attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1). Restore Habitat Restore Stream-side Habitat Attaining Vegetation Success Criteria (Section 8.3.1). Improve Vegetation Composition and Structure 8.2.2 Wetland Contingency Hydrological contingency will require consultation with hydrolo gists and regulatory agencies if wetland hydrology re-establishment is not achieved. Floodplain surface modifications, including construction of ephemeral pools, represent a likely mechanism to increase the floodplain area in support of jurisdictional wetlands. Recommendations for contingency to establish wetland hydrology will be implemented and monitored until Hydrology Success Criteria are achieved. 8.3 Vegetation After planting has been completed in winter or early spring, an initial evaluation will be performed to verify planting methods and to determine initial species composition and density. Supplemental planting and additional Site modifications will be implemented, if necessary. During quantitative vegetation sampling, 14 sample plots (10-meter by 10-meter) will be installed within the Site as per guidelines established in CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). In each sample plot, vegetation parameters to be monitored include species composition and species density. Visual observations of the percent cover of shrub and herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph. 8.3.1 Vegetation Success Criteria An average density of 320 planted stems per acre must be surviving in the first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 planted stems per acre must be surviving in year 4, 260 planted stems per acre in year 5, and 210 planted stems per acre in year 7. In addition, planted vegetation must average 10 feet in height in each plot at year 7 since this Site is located in the Piedmont. Volunteer stems may be considered on a case-by-case basis in determining overall vegetation success; however, volunteer stems should be counted separately from planted stems. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 33 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 8.3.2 Vegetation Contingency If vegetation success criteria are not achieved based on average density calculations from combined plots over the entire restoration area, supplemental planting may be performed with tree species approved by regulatory agencies. Supplemental planting will be performed as needed until achievement of vegetation success criteria. 9.0 MAINTENANCE PLAN Restoration Systems shall monitor the Site on a regular basis and shall conduct a physical inspection of the Site a minimum of once per year throughout the post-construction monitoring period until performance standards are met. These Site inspections may identify Site components and features that require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site construction and may include the following. 10.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN Upon approval for close-out by the NC IRT, the Site will be transferred to a third party for long term management as described in the NCEEP’s in lieu free instrument. Table 14. Site Maintenance Plan Component/Feature Maintenance through Project Close-out Vegetation Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor o f the targeted plant communities. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizi ng. Exotic invasive plant species shall be controlled by mechanical (i.e. chainsaw) and/or chemical (i.e. basal bark herbicide application) methods. Any vegetation control requiring herbicide application and soil fertilization will be performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations and 15A NCAC 02B .0233. Streams Stream contingency may include structure repair and/or installation; repair of dimension, pattern, and/or profile variables; bank stabilizatio n; chinking of in-stream structures to prevent piping; securing of loose coir-fiber matting; supplemental planting along the channel; and/or maintenance to areas of the stream bank where stormwater or floodplain flows are intercepted to prevent bank failure and head-cutting of the channel. The method of contingency is expected to be dependent upon stream variables that are not in compliance with success criteria. Hydrology Hydrologic contingency may include floodplain surface modifications such as construction of ephemeral pools, deep ripping of the soil profile, installation of berms to retard surface water flows, supplemental planting, and/or maintenance to areas of the wetland where stormwater or floodplain flows are intercepted to prevent scour. Recommendations for contingency to establish wetland hydrology may be implemented and monitored until hydrology success criteria are achieved. In the event that beaver become a nuisance within the Site, beaver management will be initiated and continued on an as-needed basis in accordance with North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) rules and regulations. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 34 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Site Boundary Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure a clear distinction between the mitigation Site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as allowed by Site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. Drop Structures The proposed drop structures will be monitored annually at a mi nimum. In the event of erosion or scour within the structure, maintenance may include structure repair, chinking of the structure to prevent piping, securing of loose coir-fiber matting, and/or supplemental planting of livestakes and erosion control grasses. In the event that debris clogs or inhibits flow over the structure, manual or mechanical removal of debris will occur; maintenance is only expected until the structure naturalizes. 11.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Upon completion of Site construction Restoration Systems will implement the post-construction monitoring and project maintenance protocols previously defined in this document. If, during the course of annual monitoring it is determined the Site’s ability to achieve performance standards are jeopardized, Restoration Systems will notify the NCEEP of the need to develop a Plan of Corrective Action. The Plan of Corrective Action may be prepared using in-house technical staff or may require engineering and consulting services. Once the Corrective Action Plan is prepared and finalized Restoration Systems will complete the following. 1. Notify the NCEEP 2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as necessary and/or required by the NCDWR/NCEEP. 3. Obtain other permits as necessary. 4. Implement the Corrective Action Plan. 5. Provide the NCEEP a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions. This document shall depict the extent and nature of the work performed. 12.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES As required by RFP # 16-005568 Restoration Systems will provide financial assurance for 100% of the total value of the contract to be submitted with this document (Appendix G). This bond will remain in effect until the successful completion of Task 6 (Baseline Monitoring Report Submittal). After the successful completion of Task 6, the bond will be retired and a second bond for 25% of the total value of the contract will be substituted for the first to cover the monitoring period. The monitoring phase performance bond may be reduced concurrent with the payment schedule once the yearly deliverable is approved by EEP and credits are released by the NC IRT. Therefore, the monitoring phase performance bond can be reduced after release of mitigation credit each monitoring year as follows. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 35 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Release of Mitigation Credit Bond Value as % of Total Contract Value Monitoring Year 1 20% Monitoring Year 2 18% Monitoring Year 3 16% Monitoring Year 4 14% Monitoring Year 5 12% Monitoring Year 6 10% The monitoring phase performance bond will be maintained at 10% through Monitoring Year 7 and project closeout until the final determination and release of mitigation credit by the NC IRT. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 36 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 13.0 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as-built survey. The release of project credits will be subject to the criteria described as follows. Forested Wetlands Credits Monitoring Year Credit Release Activity Interim Release Total Released 0 Initial Allocation – see requirements below 30% 30% 1 First year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 10% 40% 2 Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 10% 50% 3 Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 10% 60% 4 Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 10% 70% 5 Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met; Provided that all performance standards are met, the IRT may allow the NCEEP to discontinue hydrologic monitoring after the fifth year, but vegetation monitoring must continue for an additional two years after the fifth year for a total of seven years. 10% 80% 6 Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 10% 90% 7 Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met, and project has received close-out approval 10% 100% Stream Credits Monitoring Year Credit Release Activity Interim Release Total Released 0 Initial Allocation – see requirements below 30% 30% 1 First year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 10% 40% 2 Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 10% 50% (60%*) 3 Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 10% 60% (70%*) 4 Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 5% 65% (75%*) 5 Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 10% 75% (85%*) 6 Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met 5% 80% (90%) 7 Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met and project has received closeout approval 10% 90% (100%) *For stream projects a reserve of 10% of a site’s total stream credits shall be released after two bank-full events have occurred, in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met. In the event that less than two bank-full events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits shall be at the discretion of the IRT. Initial Allocation of Released Credits The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by the NCEEP without prior written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities. a. Approval of the final Mitigation Plan b. Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE covering the property Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 37 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina c. Completion of project construction (the initial physical and biological improvements to the mitigation site) pursuant to the mitigation plan; Per the NCEEP Instrument, construction means that a mitigation site has been constructed in its entirety, to include planting, and an as-built report has been produced. As-built reports must be sealed by an engineer prior to project closeout, if appropriate but not prior to the initial allocation of released credits. d. Receipt of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for projects where DA permit issuance is not required. Subsequent Credit Releases All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream projects a reserve of 10% of a site’s total stream credits shall be released after two bank-full events have occurred, in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met. In the event that less than two bank-full events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As projects approach milestones associated with credit release, the NCEEP will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with docume ntation substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included with the annual monitoring report. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 38 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina 14.0 REFERENCES Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Gordon, N.D., T.A. McMahon, and B.L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream Hydrology: an Introduction for Ecologists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. West Sussex, England. Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.A. O’Hara, A. Jessup, R. Everhart. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams. N.C. State University, Raleigh, North Carolina. Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). 2013. Water Quality Data Assessment (2012 Final 303(d) List) (online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=9d45b3b4-d066-4619-82e6- ea8ea0e01930&groupId=38364 [October 15, 2013]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). 2014. 2014 Draft Category 5 Water Quality Assessments-303(d) List (online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=d61a8974-6af6-4edb-829f- e658935e3341&groupId=38364 [March 17, 2014]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2013. North Carolina Water Bodies Report (online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=10c60296-dcc8-439f-a41c- d475ea7ad1fa&groupId=38364 [March 17, 2014]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP 2009). Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 (online). Available : http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=864e82e8-725c-415e-8ed9- c72dfcb55012&groupId=60329 Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) page 39 Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), Philip M. Brown, Chief Geologist, and John M. Parker, III, State Geologic Map Coordinator in association with The State Geologic Map Advisory Committee,1985, 1 plate. Copyright: NCGS. The Piedmont Triad Council of Governments (PTCOG 2008). Little Alamance, Travis, & Tickle Creek Watersheds Restoration Plan. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina. Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs, Colorado Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North Ccarolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina. Simon A, Hupp CR. 1986. Geomorphic and Vegetative Recovery Processes Along Modified Tennessee Streams: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Disturbed Fluvial Systems. Forest Hydrology and Watershed Management. IAHS-AISH Publ.167. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2013. Web Soil Survey (online). Available: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx [October 2013]. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1960. Soil Survey of Alamance County, North Carolina. Soil Conservation Service. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990. Mitigation Site Type Classification (MiST). EPA Workshop, August 13-15, 1989. EPA Region IV and Hardwood Research Cooperative, NCSU, Raleigh, North Carolina. United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2006. Estimating the Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in Rural Basins of North Carolina – Recompiled. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4207. Raleigh, North Carolina. Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Appendices Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina APPENDIX A FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location Figure 2. Hydrologic Unit Map Figure 3. Topography and Drainage Area Figure 4. Existing Conditions Figure 5A. Cedarock Reference Drainage Area Figure 5B. Existing Conditions Cedarock Reference Figure 5C. Cedarock Reference Reach Dimension, Pattern, and Profile Figures 6A-C. Restoration Plan Figure 7. Proposed Dimension, Pattern, and Profile Figures 8A-B. Typical Structure Details Figure 9. Planting Plan Church Street 8 7 H i g h w a y Burlingto n R o a d Carmon Road El o n - O s s i p p e R o a d Webb A v e n u e Bethe l C h u r c h R o a d Cu l l e n R o a d Du r h a m S t r e e t Howerton Road Amick Road NC - 1 0 0 H i g h w a y N C - 6 1 H i g h w a y Fried e n C h u r c h R o a d Cotton R o a d Bell Road M a n n i n g S t r e e t Mc I n t y r e R o a d Wago n e r R o a d Gerringer Mill Road Lowe R o a d E n d w e l l R o a d Pitt Road Co u n t y F a r m R o a d Barber Road Kivette House Road Eagles f i e l d R o a d Keans b u r g R o a d Whitsett Park Roa d Power Line Road Fr a n k R o a d Phibbs Road Fernway Road Dow Drive N C - 6 1 H i g h w a y Alamance County, NC Title: Prepared for: Notes: Background Imagery sources(provided by ESRI Data andMaps):1. Physical Map of the UnitedStates (2009) created by theU.S. Park Service (upper inset).2. Delorme World Basemapdigital mapping (2010, lowerinset).3. Burlington, NC (1980),Lake Burlington, NC (1969),Gibsonville, NC (1970), andOssipee, NC (1970) 7.5-minute topographicquadrangles provided by theU.S. Geological Survey. ProjectLocation Aycock SpringsStream andWetlandRestorationSite Project: FIGURE Drawn by: Date: Scale: Project No.: SGD Oct 2013 As Shown 13-004.02 §¨¦40101230.5 Miles Legend Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site County lines 1 AL A M A N C E C O U N T Y Gi b s o n v i l l e - O s s i p e e R o a d !. £¤70 ¬«100 k k µ ¬«87 ¬«54 ¬«87 ¬« 87 Directions to the Site from Interstates 40/85 in Burlington/Elon, NC:- Exit onto University Drive (I-40/85 Exit 140) and travel north (toward Elon)- Travel north for 2.8 miles and merge with NC 100- Continue on University Drive (NC 100) for 0.5 mile and turn left onto Manning Street (SR 1503)- Travel northwest for 0.8 mile and turn right onto Gibsonville-Ossipee Road (SR 1500)- Travel north for 0.7 mile and Site is on the right Aycock SpringsStream and Wetland Restoration Site 36.127271 N-79.525214 W GIBSONVILLE WHITSETT ELON BURLINGTON GU I L F O R D C O U N T Y §¨¦85 !( Alamance County, NC HydrologicUnit Map Aycock SpringsStream andWetlandRestorationSite FIGURE Drawn by: Date: Scale: Project No.: SGD Nov 2014 13-004.02 Title: Project: Prepared for: 2 As Shown Location of Aycock Springs Stream and WetlandRestoration Site withinUSGS Hydrologic Unit and 10 0 10 205 Miles Legend Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site easement USGS Hydrologic Unit 03030002 14-digit hydrologic unit boundary Targeted Local Watersheds !(Reference site location Targeted Local Watershed03030002030010 ³ !( !( Location ofCripple Creek Reference Site Location ofCedarock Reference Site Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Alamance County, NC Title: Prepared for: Notes: Background Imagery sources(provided by ESRI Data andMaps):1. Burlington, NC (1980),Lake Burlington, NC (1969),Gibsonville, NC (1970), andOssipee, NC (1970) 7.5-minute topographicquadrangles provided by theU.S. Geological Survey. TopographyandDrainage Area Aycock SpringsStream andWetlandRestorationSite Project: FIGURE Drawn by: Date: Scale: Project No.: WGL OCT 2013 As Shown 13-004.02 3 AL A M A N C E C O U N T Y ¬«87 GU I L F O R D C O U N T Y Legend Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Little Alamance, Travis, & Tickle Creek (LATT) Watersheds Restoration Plan - Site TT 3.1 Guilfod County Open Space Total Drainage Area = 4.7 sq mi(3008 ac) 0.19 sq mi(119 ac) 0.11 sq mi(68 ac) 0.04 sq mi(26 ac) Ü 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.60.2 Miles LATTSiteTT 3.1 Mc Hb C 2 Mg Hb B 2 Hb C 2 HaC3Wd Ha C 3 Ha C 3 Cb C 2 Va B 2 Hb C 2 Hb C Hb B 2 Mg AbB W Wd HaC3MgSa Ha C 3 Hb C 2 Wd IbC2HbBAbC HbB2 6 0 0 620 6 4 0 6 2 0 6 2 0 6 2 0 6 4 0 612 608 6 0 4 616 624 5 9 6 6 2 8 632 636 592 64 4 5 96 592 6 4 4 6 2 4 6 3 2 6 1 6 616 628 636 NC OneMapAlamance County, NC Title:Prepared for:Notes:1. Background Imagery source:2010 aerial photography provided by the NC OneMap Program (online, supported by the NC Geographic Information Coordination Council). 2. 4-foot elevation contours are generated from 2007 Light Distance and Ranging (LiDAR)data generated by the NC Floodplain Mapping Program and provided by the NC Department of Transportation.Existing ConditionsAycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation SiteProject:FIGUREDrawn by:Date:Scale:Project No.: 20 0 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 10 0 Fe e t ³Le g e n d Ay c o c k S p r i n g s S t r e a m a n d W e t l a n d M i t i g a t i o n S i t e = 1 3 . 3 a c r e s Ex i s t i n g s t r e a m s = 5 0 6 9 l i n e a r f e e t !( So i l P r o f i l e So i l B o u n d a r y Ex i s t i n g W e t l a n d s = 1 . 6 a c Dr a i n e d h y d r i c s o i l s = 0 . 6 a c r e 4- f o o t e l e v a t i o n c o n t o u r s 4SGDAPR 2014 1:2400 14-006 So i l M a p U n i t So i l S e r i e s Cb C 2 Ce c i l f i n e s a n d y l o a m Ha C 3 a n d H b B 2 H e l e n a C l a y l o a m a n d H e l e n a c o a r s e s a n d y l o a m Mc Mi x e d A l l u v i a l L a n d / P o o r l y D r a i n e d Sa Se v e r e l y G u l l i e d L a n d Wd Wo r s h a m s a n d y l o a m UT 1 UT 2 UT 3 UT 4 T r a v i s C r e e k !( Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Axiom Environmental218 Snow AvenueRaleigh, NC 27603(919) 215-1693 CEDAROCK REFERENCE DRAINAGE AREAAYCOCK SPRINGS RESTORATION SITEAlamance County, North Carolina Dwn. by. Date: Project: FIGURE5AWGL Mar 2014 14-005 ³0 640 1,280 1,920320Feet !( NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC911 Board 0 640 1,280 1,920320Feet³1:8600 1:8600 Legend - Drainage Area Topography !(Cedarock Reference Site Cedarock Reference Drainage Area = 0.21 sq mi Legend - Land Use !(Cedarock Reference Site Cedarock Reference Drainage Area = 0.21 sq mi 6 0 0 560 5 4 0 5 8 0 520 620 560 540 560 5 4 0 NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC911 Board Axiom Environmental218 Snow AvenueRaleigh, NC 27603(919) 215-1693 EXISTING CONDITIONSAYCOCK SPRINGS REFERENCE REACHABBEY LAMM REFERENCE SITEAlamance County, North Carolina Dwn. by. Date: Project: FIGURE5BWGL Mar 2014 14-005 ³0 250500750125Feet Legend Cedarock Reference Site Contour at 20 feet Contour at 4 feet Contour at 100 feet Contour at 500 feet Streams 92949698 10 0 10 2 10 4 10 6 0 50 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 30 0 35 0 40 0 45 0 27 2 27 3 27 4 27 5 27 6 0 1 0 2 0 30 40 27 4 27 5 27 6 27 7 27 8 0 1 0 20 30 27 4 27 5 27 6 27 7 27 8 27 9 0 1 0 2 0 30 27 6 27 7 27 8 27 9 28 0 0 1 0 20 30 27 7 27 8 27 9 28 0 28 1 28 2 28 3 0 1 0 20 30 Travis Creek Start Enhancement X0(1+00 Slope and Stake Stream Banks LEGEND Easement Design Stream Channel Preexisting Alignment Major Topographic Line Minor Topographic Line Cross Vane (Log or Stone) Vane Arm (Log or Stone) Slope Banks and/or Willow Stake Brush Mattress Drop Structure Rip Rap Dissipator Pad C Piped Crossing Building or Structure Control Point Wetland Restoration = 0.5 ac Wetland Enhancement = 1.5 ac 0 1'0 100 SCALE IN FEET Scale: FIGURE NO. As Shown Date: October 2014 6A Project No.: 14-006 610 erracell rop Structure ev = 5W.45 sOs " "N6 k CP4 O 671.7 Travis_ spo, Start REser Staa� 05+78 Travis Creekk, End Restorat Sta = 07+87 Elev = 594.30 Travis Creek End Enhancement Sta = 08+86 Project: Restoration Plan Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County, North Carolina 7 UT 3 Start Restoration Sta = 00+00 Elev = 598.33 -Drop Structure Elev 597.79 • '- • • . 02+12 ., .51 ,< Creek �storation Slope and Stake I\, Travis Cr goo, Start Re ,t o Sta = 1 avis� Elev St Re Sta 1; i G WOODEN SHEL WITH CONCR O 100 SCAI = IN FFFT Scale: As Shown FIGURE NO. 6 B Date: October 2014 Project No.: 14-006 1 01 o rn 's Travis Creek End Restoration Sta 20+35 on Credit Generation 6 Travis Creek Tie to Existing Grade Sta = 20+95 Elev = 592.24 LEGEND 6C Easement Design Stream Channel Preexisting Alignment Major Topographic Line Minor Topographic Line Cross Vane (Log or Stone) Vane Arm (Log or Stone) Slope Banks and/or Willow Stake Brush Mattress Drop Structure Rip Rap Dissipator Pad Piped Crossing C i Building or Structure O°P` Control Point Wetland Restoration = 0.5 ac Wetland Enhancement = 1.5 ac i Project: Restoration Plan Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County, North Carolina Tie Pipe Infall to Existing Pipe outfall Invert = 614.85 0 RCP Zo r `UT 2 / Start Restoration to = 00+00 lev = 610.62 �� s Design Stream Channel Preexisting Alignment M UT 2 End Restoration Sta = 06+75 Elev = 593.04 w 01 0 Rip Rap 6A stor Pad 1 6C Restoration 675 613 0 CD 0 0� C 11 0 'N LEGEND /-Terracell Drop Structure Elev = 591.87 End Restoration Sta = 13+21 50 ROCK lev = 589.09 SCALE IN FEET Scale: FIGURE NO. As Shown Date: October 2014 6 C Project No.: 14-006 Project: Restoration Plan Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental. Inc. Easement Design Stream Channel Preexisting Alignment Major Topographic Line Minor Topographic Line Cross Vane (Log or Stone) Vane Arm (Log or Stone) Slope Banks and/or Willow Stake Brush Mattress Drop Structure ISO Rip Rap Dissipator Pad Piped Crossing o Building or Structure O.P. Control Point Wetland Restoration = 0.5 ac Wetland Enhancement = 1.5 ac /-Terracell Drop Structure Elev = 591.87 End Restoration Sta = 13+21 50 ROCK lev = 589.09 SCALE IN FEET Scale: FIGURE NO. As Shown Date: October 2014 6 C Project No.: 14-006 Project: Restoration Plan Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental. Inc. RiFFi F RiFFi F 1 _ _ _WATER SURFACE T 'ELifvATION BOTTOM OF \ ` CHANNEL 7 POOL -TO -POOL SPACING (ft.) (VARIES - SEE NOTE 1) TYPICAL CHANNEL PROFILE NOTES: 1. POOL -TO -POOL SPACING IS MEASURED FROM CENTER OF POOL BEND TO CENTER OF POOL BEND. R1 HEAD OF RIFFLE -TAIL OF i R2 / / TYPICAL CHANNEL PLAN VIEW CHANNEL PLAN VIEW NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT THE CHANNEL ALIGNMENT BY LOCATING THE RADII AND SCRIBING THE CENTER LINE FOR EACH POOL BEND. THE CONNECTING TANGENT SECTIONS SHALL COMPLETE THE LAYOUT OF THE CHANNEL. 2. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF THE ALIGNMENT MAY BE REQUIRED TO SAVE TREES OR AVOID OBSTACLES. THE STAKE -OUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL. VALLEY SIDE SLOPE PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN 15' MIN. 7 1 /�i"vrll BANK SLOPE -" EXTEND STONE BED MATERIAL UP CHANNELBANK TO 1/3 Drill LIVE WILLOW STAKES COIR FIBER EROSION PROPOSED CONTROL MATTING FLOODPLAIN Axiom Environmental, Inc. Class A and Cobble Slone TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION p Wool COIR FIBER EROSION CONTROL MATTING SEE NOTE 4 FR FL ARIES• 2 0 MAX. 1:1 SLOPE TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM CHANNEL AND FLOODPLAIN SHALL BE USED TO BACKFILL EXISTING CHANNEL. 2. BANK PROTECTION SHALL CONSIST OF NATURAL COIR FIBER MATTING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY BED MATERIAL FOR THE ENTIRE BED LENGTH OF EACH RIFFLE SECTION. THE BED MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF A MIX OF CLASS B AND CLASS 1 STONE. LIVE WILLOW STAKES OPOSED OODPLAIN7 POOLLENGTH REACH Wbkf ft. Wbot ft_) Drill ft. Dthal ft. D ool ft. ' R1 �, TAIL Unnamed Tributaries 1 and 2 7,8 --, H \ RIFFLEE loll• 1.0 / DESIGN 3.9 0.3 0.1 0.8 Gk � F IN O CHANNEL Unnamed Tributary 4 9.4 �• 1.0 11.3 0.5 Travis Creek 27.7 16.5 2.7 0.1 3.8 33.3 1.0 411 / R1 HEAD OF RIFFLE -TAIL OF i R2 / / TYPICAL CHANNEL PLAN VIEW CHANNEL PLAN VIEW NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT THE CHANNEL ALIGNMENT BY LOCATING THE RADII AND SCRIBING THE CENTER LINE FOR EACH POOL BEND. THE CONNECTING TANGENT SECTIONS SHALL COMPLETE THE LAYOUT OF THE CHANNEL. 2. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF THE ALIGNMENT MAY BE REQUIRED TO SAVE TREES OR AVOID OBSTACLES. THE STAKE -OUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL. VALLEY SIDE SLOPE PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN 15' MIN. 7 1 /�i"vrll BANK SLOPE -" EXTEND STONE BED MATERIAL UP CHANNELBANK TO 1/3 Drill LIVE WILLOW STAKES COIR FIBER EROSION PROPOSED CONTROL MATTING FLOODPLAIN Axiom Environmental, Inc. Class A and Cobble Slone TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION p Wool COIR FIBER EROSION CONTROL MATTING SEE NOTE 4 FR FL ARIES• 2 0 MAX. 1:1 SLOPE TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM CHANNEL AND FLOODPLAIN SHALL BE USED TO BACKFILL EXISTING CHANNEL. 2. BANK PROTECTION SHALL CONSIST OF NATURAL COIR FIBER MATTING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY BED MATERIAL FOR THE ENTIRE BED LENGTH OF EACH RIFFLE SECTION. THE BED MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF A MIX OF CLASS B AND CLASS 1 STONE. LIVE WILLOW STAKES OPOSED OODPLAIN7 NOTES/REVISIONS Project: Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County North Carolina Title: PROPOSED DIMENSION, PATTERN, AND PROFILE Scale: NA FIGURE NO. Date: 7 October 2014 Project No.: 14-006 CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS REACH Wbkf ft. Wbot ft_) Drill ft. Dthal ft. D ool ft. Wool ft. Wthal ft. Unnamed Tributaries 1 and 2 7,8 4.6 0.7 0.1 1.1 9.4 1.0 Unnamed Tributary 3 5.5 3.9 0.3 0.1 0.8 6.6 1.0 Unnamed Tributary 4 9.4 5.4 0.9 0.1 1.0 11.3 0.5 Travis Creek 27.7 16.5 2.7 0.1 3.8 33.3 1.0 NOTES/REVISIONS Project: Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County North Carolina Title: PROPOSED DIMENSION, PATTERN, AND PROFILE Scale: NA FIGURE NO. Date: 7 October 2014 Project No.: 14-006 LOG CROSS VANE SCALE:NTS PLAN VIEW J FLOW z #57 STONE AND CLASS'A' RIP RAPT NOTES: NATIVE CHANNEL A FILTER FABRIC 1. HEADER AND FOOTER LOGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18" MATERIAL LOG SILL DIAMETER AND SHALL BE A HARDWOOD SPECIES. ° (FOOTER LOG MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH PINE) - _ 2. A DOUBLE FOOTER LOG MAY BE REQUIRED IN SAND BED STREAMS. FILTER FABRIC 3. ALL STONES ARE TO BE STRUCTURE STONES. / 4. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE HEADER LOG OF THE STRUCTURE TO PREVENT WASHOUT OF SEDIMENT THROUGH LOG GAPS. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND j / FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTER TO THE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION AND SHALL BE PLACED THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE FOOTE STRUCTURE. • . 5. PERPENDICULAR ROOTWAD LOGS ARE REQUIRED IF THE LOG B LOG O B VANE ARM DOES NOT HAVE A ROOTBALL TO TIE INTO THE BANK. DEPS POOL jy" Wf�iyi" HEADER LOG A COIR LOG TOP OF BANK CLASS W RIP RAP / FLOW (BANKFULL) NATIVE CHANNEL MATERIAL #57 STONE / NATIVE O SCOUR EXISTING TOP OF BANKEXISTING CHANNEL MATERIAL GROUND HEADER LOG (BANKFULL) / COIR LOG-" STREAMBED BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED POOL �- FILTER ELEVATION WITH #57 STONE AND 3Q"-$ Tj� QQ-� FABRIC CLASS 'A' RIP RAP /NATIVE1.�.�i�T?��'�'j�,,, � �C FOOTER LOG CHANNEL MATERIAL J�( STREAMBED FILTER FABRIC SECTION A -A ELEVATION FOOTERLOG SECTION B -B REACH ARM LENGTH (FT.) CHANNEL DEPTH (FT.) Tributaries 1, 2, 3 and 4 7 0.8-1.0 Travis Creek 22 2.7-3.0 NOTE: HEADER AND FOOTER STONES ARE LARGE, ANGULAR BOULDERS MEASURING A MINIMUM OF 24" ALONG THE SHORTEST DIMENSION. CHANNEL CHANNEL BANK 1 1 I BANK FII TFR 0 /2 Y2 EXIST. \ CHANNEL / \ HEADER/ \ STONE, — FOOTER ELEVATION A -A STONE ARM LENGTH R STONE 0.5' HEADER STONE BACK FILL TO GRADE FOOTER STONE � CHANNEL ROCK FILL (#57 STONE) PLAN VIEW WHERE NEEDED TYPICAL CROSS -VANE PROFILE B -B FLOW EXIST. GROUND FILTER FABRIC A \ CI ANNEL \t BANK I LARCL SIOVL 1 1 SCOUR / HOLE / / t ` NOTE: FILTER FABRIC TOED IN AND DRAPED ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF LOG VANE PRIOR TO BACKFILL. TOP OF BANK \ \ \ \ CHANNEL BANK PLAN VIEW S CAL L. N.I.S. A LOG VANE FILTER FABRIC LARGE STONE CROSS-SECTION A -A SCALE: N.T.S. LARGE TOP OF BANK STONE BANKFULL _______ __ __ _ ,J 10.15* FLOW BOTTOML�j��OF CHANNEL _ _ ------/--———— — — — — —— � r Loc VANE FILTER FABRIC NOTE: FILTER FABRIC TOED IN AND DRAPED PROFILE B -S ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF LOG VANE SCALE N.T.S. PRIOR TO BACKFILL. TYPICAL LOG VANE OF Axiom Environmental, Inc. I NOTES/REVISIONS Project: Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County North Carolina Title: TYPICAL STRUCTURE DETAILS Scale: FIGURE NO. NO SCALE Date: A October 2014 Project No.: 14-006 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION rTR TERRACELL TWINE FILTER CLOTH 18 IN TERRACEL SYNTHETIC GEOGRID PROFILE BR TERRACELI ----------------------- RIP RAP (SEE NOTES) TERRACELL STRUCTURE NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL 18 -INCH TERRACELL SYNTHETIC GEOGRID AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AT BOTTOM RIFFLE DOWNSTREAM FROM TERRACELL STRUCTURE THE POOL WILL BE ARMORED WITH EROSION CONTROL FABRIC AND CLASS 1 RIP RAP OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL. A MINIMUM OF 50 BRANCHES, 1" OR LESS IN DIAMETER, PER 3 FEET EVENLY DISTRIBUTED FOR FULL WIDTH OF MATTRESS WOODEN POSTS ° LIVE STAKE ( SEE NOTE 4&5) 0 0 9 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE SECURED TO POSTS ( SEE NOTE 4) 0 0 BASAL ENDS FACING DOWN SLOPE (IN ° CONTACT WITH FASCINE, IF USED) E PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE 1 1/2"X3 1/2" LUMBER O POST DETAIL NOT TO SCALE MEAN WATER LEVEL LIVE FASCINE ( SEE NOTE 5) WATER 1.5' MINIMUM \7 3' SECTION A -A' CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 18 IN TERRACELL % SYNTHETIC GEOGRID FILTER CLOTH CROSS-SECTION TERRACELL STRUCTURE NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL 18 -INCH TERRACELL SYNTHETIC GEOGRID AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ONCE THE SYNTHETIC GEOGRID HAS BEEN INSTALLED, GEOCELLS WILL BE BACKFILLED WITH GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL AND PLANTED WITH EROSION CONTROL GRASSES AND WILLOW STAKES (SALIVN/GRA. 1. LAYERS SHALL BE COMPRISED OF LIVE QUICK -ROOTING SPECIES. 2. FILL MATTRESS WITH SOIL AND EVENLY DISTRIBUTE TO APPROXIMATELY 4" IN DEPTH AND HAND TAMP. 3. PLACE POSTS EVENLY OVER THE GRADED FACE USING T SQUARE SPACING. IF LIVE STAKES ARE SPECIFIED, ALTERNATE EVERY OTHER ON WITH THE POSTS. 4. STRETCH 9 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE DIAGONALLY FROM ONE POST TO ANOTHER BY TIGHTLY WRAPPING WIRE AROUND POSTS, NO CLOSER THAN 6" FROM THE TOP OF POST. WIRE SHALL NOT BE ATTACHED TO LIVE STAKES, IF THEY ARE SPECIFIED. POUND STAKES TO COMPRESS MATTRESS. 5. LIVE FASCINES AND LIVE STAKES ARE INSTALLED AT TOE OF ALL BRUSH MATTRESS LOCATIONS. ROCK TOE PROTECTION MAY BE USED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE FIELD ENGINEER. Axiom Environmental, Inc. NOTES/REVISIONS Project: Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County North Carolina Title: TYPICAL STRUCTURE DETAILS Scale: FIGURE NO. NO SCALE Date: October 2014 8B Project No.: 14-006 SAW 1 1/2"x3 1/2" DIAGONALLY TO PRODUCE TWO POSTS WOODEN POST BRUSH LAYER / COVERED WITH MIN. 3" SELECT CLEAN LAYER SELECT CLEAN FILL FILL AND HAND TAMPED 1.5' MINIMUM \7 3' SECTION A -A' CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 18 IN TERRACELL % SYNTHETIC GEOGRID FILTER CLOTH CROSS-SECTION TERRACELL STRUCTURE NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL 18 -INCH TERRACELL SYNTHETIC GEOGRID AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ONCE THE SYNTHETIC GEOGRID HAS BEEN INSTALLED, GEOCELLS WILL BE BACKFILLED WITH GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL AND PLANTED WITH EROSION CONTROL GRASSES AND WILLOW STAKES (SALIVN/GRA. 1. LAYERS SHALL BE COMPRISED OF LIVE QUICK -ROOTING SPECIES. 2. FILL MATTRESS WITH SOIL AND EVENLY DISTRIBUTE TO APPROXIMATELY 4" IN DEPTH AND HAND TAMP. 3. PLACE POSTS EVENLY OVER THE GRADED FACE USING T SQUARE SPACING. IF LIVE STAKES ARE SPECIFIED, ALTERNATE EVERY OTHER ON WITH THE POSTS. 4. STRETCH 9 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE DIAGONALLY FROM ONE POST TO ANOTHER BY TIGHTLY WRAPPING WIRE AROUND POSTS, NO CLOSER THAN 6" FROM THE TOP OF POST. WIRE SHALL NOT BE ATTACHED TO LIVE STAKES, IF THEY ARE SPECIFIED. POUND STAKES TO COMPRESS MATTRESS. 5. LIVE FASCINES AND LIVE STAKES ARE INSTALLED AT TOE OF ALL BRUSH MATTRESS LOCATIONS. ROCK TOE PROTECTION MAY BE USED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE FIELD ENGINEER. Axiom Environmental, Inc. NOTES/REVISIONS Project: Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County North Carolina Title: TYPICAL STRUCTURE DETAILS Scale: FIGURE NO. NO SCALE Date: October 2014 8B Project No.: 14-006 Ve g e t a t i o n A s s o c i a t i o n Pi e d m o n t / L o w M o u n t a i n Al l u v i a l F o r e s t * Dr y - M e s i c O a k - H i c k o r y Fo r e s t * St r e a m - s i d e As s e m b l a g e * * T O T A L Ar e a ( a c r e s ) 4. 8 4. 3 2. 8 11 . 9 Sp e c i e s # p l a n t e d * % o f t o t a l # p l a n t e d * % o f t o t a l # pl a n t e d * * % o f t o t a l # p l a n t e d Ta g a l d e r ( Al n u s s e r r u l a t a ) - - - - - - - - 3 0 4 6 4 0 3 0 4 6 Ri v e r b i r c h ( Be t u l a n i g r a ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Ir o n w o o d ( Ca r p i n u s c a r o l i n i a n a ) - - - - 4 3 9 1 5 - - - - 4 3 9 Si l k y d o g w o o d ( Co r n u s a m o m u m ) 32 6 10 -- - - 1 5 2 3 2 0 1 8 4 9 Fl o w e r i n g d o g w o o d ( Co r n u s f l o r i d a ) - - - - 1 4 6 5 - - - - 1 4 6 Pe r s i m m o n ( Di o s p y r o s v i r g i n i a n a ) -- -- 14 6 5 - - - - 1 4 6 Wh i t e a s h ( Fr a x i n u s a m e r i c a n a ) - - - - 4 3 9 1 5 - - - - 4 3 9 Gr e e n a s h ( Fr a x i n u s p e n n s y l v a n i c a ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Tu l i p p o p l a r ( Li r i o d e n d r o n t u l i p i f e r a ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Sw a m p b l a c k g u m ( Ny s s a b i f l o r a ) 32 6 10 -- - - - - - - 3 2 6 Sy c a m o r e ( Pl a t a n u s o c c i d e n t a l i s ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Re d m a p l e ( Ac e r r u b r u m ) - - - - 4 3 9 1 5 - - - - 4 3 9 Wh i t e o a k ( Qu e r c u s a l b a ) -- - - 4 3 9 1 5 - - - - 4 3 9 Wa t e r o a k ( Qu e r c u s n i g r a ) 32 6 10 29 2 1 0 - - - - 6 1 8 Ch e r r y b a r k o a k ( Qu e r c u s p a g o d a ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 Wi l l o w o a k ( Qu e r c u s p h e l l o s ) 3 2 6 1 0 2 9 2 1 0 - - - - 6 1 8 No r t h e r n r e d o a k ( Qu e r c u s r u b r a ) - - - - 2 9 2 1 0 - - - - 2 9 2 Bl a c k w i l l o w ( Sa l i x n i g r a ) -- -- -- - - 3 0 4 6 4 0 3 0 4 6 Am e r i c a n e l m ( Ul m u s a m e r i c a n a ) 3 2 6 1 0 - - - - - - - - 3 2 6 TO T A L 3 2 6 0 1 0 0 2 9 2 4 1 0 0 7 6 1 5 1 0 0 1 3 , 7 9 9 * P l a n t e d a t a d e n s i t y o f 6 8 0 s t e m s / a c r e . ** P l a n t e d a t a d e n s i t y o f 2 7 2 0 s t e m s / a c r e . Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Appendices Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Appendix B Existing Stream Data Figure B1. Cross-section Locations Existing Stream Data XS 33J XS 43 LEGEND Easement Major Topographic Line Minor Topographic Line Building or Structure Control Point Cross Section a XS 35 ,,-XS 36 ---XS 37 XS 45 �(( XS 55 XS 105 XS 1 0 S117 KS 115 3112 )7 Axiom Environmental, Inc. NOTES/REVISIONS Project: Aycock Springs Restoration Site Alamance County North Carolina Title: Cross Section Locations Scale: FIGURE NO. As Shown Date: October 2014 B-1 Project No.: 14-006 Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 1 - XS 120 section:Tributary 1 - XS 117 Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 1 - XS 120 description:Tributary 1 - XS 117 height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft):100.00 omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpa channelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n"notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n" ####03.966116 96.03388 7.795.2812.0 ####011.21486 88.78515 15.8811.218.0 ####17.50936 4.738875 95.26113 92.21 94.72 ####7.157272 13.17527 86.82473 84.12 88.79 ####26.4135.28353 94.71647 ####10.4646514.17914 85.82086 ####31.762017.562895 92.43711dimensions ####13.3394715.25336 84.74664dimensions ####33.52421 8.475347 91.52465 4.3 x-section area 0.9 d mean ####15.43697 17.46324 82.53676 4.3 x-section area 1.1 d mean ####34.253249.308942 90.69106 4.7width 6.2wet P ####17.1331617.41386 82.58614 3.8width 5.5wet P ####35.254429.627879 90.37212 1.8d max 0.7hyd radi ####18.3618814.44701 85.55299 1.6d max 0.8hyd radi ####36.440628.084717 91.91528 4.3bank ht 5.3w/d ratio ####22.8165212.88073 87.11927 6.3bank ht 3.4w/d ratio ####39.20576 6.448435 93.55157 12.0 W flood prone area 2.5 ent ratio ####28.06661 11.42223 88.57777 8.0 W flood prone area 2.1 ent ratio ####41.68527 5.446181 94.55382 ####31.08941 10.3341 89.6659 ####46.07522 4.102802 95.8972 hydraulics ####47.22682 10.01681 89.98319 hydraulics ####51.890733.872473 96.12753 0.0velocity (ft/sec)####63.495139.44483 90.55517 0.0velocity (ft/sec) ####58.507533.25794 96.74206 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)#####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) #####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)#####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) #####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec)#####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) #####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)#####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*#####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* #####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)#####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) #####N/A #####N/A #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)#####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A #####N/A 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 1 -XS 120 Riffle --- 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 1 -XS 117 Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 1 - XS 115 section:Tributary 1 - XS 112 Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 1 - XS 115 description:Tributary 1 - XS 112 height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft):100.00 omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpa channelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n"notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n" ####011.75486 88.24514 17.5615.1127.0 ####017.15078 82.84922 18.7417.5420.0 ####6.805661 12.83356 87.16644 82.44 84.89 ####14.20333 17.4292 82.5708 81.26 82.46 ####10.4494917.14314 82.85686 ####26.5211617.54025 82.45975 ####12.5379918.76196 81.23804dimensions ####31.6533318.03903 81.96097dimensions ####14.17088 18.79814 81.20186 4.3 x-section area 0.8 d mean ####36.36605 19.71639 80.28361 4.3 x-section area 0.6 d mean ####14.6768218.68416 81.31584 5.5width 6.3wet P ####37.6298120.001 79.999 6.8width 7.3wet P ####15.923917.65015 82.34985 1.2d max 0.7hyd radi ####39.8309218.85325 81.14675 1.3d max 0.6hyd radi ####18.6546717.19346 82.80654 3.7bank ht 7.0w/d ratio ####44.694317.97784 82.02216 2.5bank ht 10.9w/d ratio ####22.64168 16.09078 83.90923 27.0 W flood prone area 4.9 ent ratio ####48.45308 17.25153 82.74847 20.0 W flood prone area 2.9 ent ratio ####25.50756 15.1137 84.8863 ####56.60477 17.01422 82.98578 ####35.24799 14.61247 85.38753 hydraulics ####71.93629 17.47357 82.52643 hydraulics ####41.2351614.99201 85.00799 0.0velocity (ft/sec)####93.8631316.79637 83.20363 0.0velocity (ft/sec) ####52.0894115.55314 84.44686 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)#####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) ####66.4753114.78756 85.212440.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)#####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) ####75.7584614.64446 85.355540.00shear velocity (ft/sec)#####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) #####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)#####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*#####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* #####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)#####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) #####N/A #####N/A #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)#####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A #####N/A 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 1 -XS 115 Riffle --- 79.5 80 80.5 81 81.5 82 82.5 83 83.5 0102030405060708090100 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 1 -XS 112 Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 1 - XS 97 section: Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 1 - XS 97 description: height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft): omit distanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n"notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n" ####019.18999 80.81001 20.882073.0 #####N/A ####14.45159 19.66579 80.33421 79.12 80 #####N/A 0 --- ####33.5720219.97747 80.02253 #####N/A ####53.2050419.99652 80.00348dimensions #####N/A dimensions ####64.12033 20.55285 79.44715 4.3 x-section area 0.8 d mean #####N/A 0.0 x-section area 0.0 d mean ####67.0526821.21886 78.78115 5.7width 6.8wet P #####N/A 0.0width 0.0wet P ####68.3883122.29816 77.70184 1.5d max 0.6hyd radi #####N/A 0.0d max 0.0hyd radi ####69.6774722.41402 77.58598 2.4bank ht 7.5w/d ratio #####N/A 0.0bank ht 0.0w/d ratio ####70.89074 20.96726 79.03274 73.0 W flood prone area 12.8 ent ratio #####N/A 0.0 W flood prone area 0.0 ent ratio ####76.50151 19.64941 80.35059 #####N/A ####88.36684 17.96524 82.03476 hydraulics #####N/A hydraulics #####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec)#####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec) #####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)#####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) #####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)#####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) #####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec)#####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) #####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)#####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*#####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* #####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)#####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) #####N/A #####N/A #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)#####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A #####N/A 77 77.5 78 78.5 79 79.5 80 80.5 81 81.5 82 82.5 0102030405060708090100 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 1 -XS 97 Riffle --- 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 2 - XS 105 section:Tributary 2 - XS 101 Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 2 - XS 105 description:Tributary 2 - XS 101 height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft):100.00 omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpa channelManning's notespt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n"notespt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n" ###07.428074 92.57193 8.6 8.4440.0 ###011.93948 88.06053 13.4713.0144.0 ###11.65535 8.207391 91.7926191.491.56 ###15.72837 12.63872 87.3612886.5386.99 ###17.597598.443627 91.55637 ###32.2791813.11127 86.88873 ###21.414749.131458 90.86854dimensions ###38.8460113.01539 86.98461dimensions ###22.97686 9.713355 90.28665 4.3x-section area 0.5d mean ###43.76651 14.08199 85.91801 4.3x-section area 0.5d mean ###26.051418.840689 91.15931 8.6width 8.9wet P ###46.4761814.44955 85.55046 8.8width 9.1wet P ###28.861538.166071 91.83393 1.1d max 0.5hyd radi ###48.5509413.634 86.36601 1.0d max 0.5hyd radi ###37.256077.874606 92.12539 1.3bank ht 17.3w/d ratio ###52.7396313.0763 86.9237 1.4bank ht 18.1w/d ratio ###45.16904 7.147763 92.8522440.0W flood prone area4.7ent ratio ###54.46965 12.61432 87.3856844.0W flood prone area5.0ent ratio ####N/A ###65.10428 11.96467 88.03533 ####N/A hydraulics ###76.57903 11.70086 88.29914hydraulics ####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec) ####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) ####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) ####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) ####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) ####N/A 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* ####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) ####N/A ####N/A ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A ####N/A 90 90.5 91 91.5 92 92.5 93 05101520253035404550 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 2 -XS 105 Riffle --- 85 85.5 86 86.5 87 87.5 88 88.5 0 102030405060708090 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 2 -XS 101 Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 2 - XS 98 section: Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 2 - XS 98 description: height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft): omit distanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's notespt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n"notespt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n" ###017.34031 82.65969 19.2618.5317.0 ####N/A ###11.16914 17.89032 82.1096880.7481.47 ####N/A 0--- ###20.9892418.53033 81.46967 ####N/A ###24.9178119.45162 80.54838dimensions ####N/A dimensions ###29.37666 20.09645 79.90355 4.3x-section area 0.4d mean ####N/A 0.0x-section area 0.0d mean ###32.511119.55099 80.44901 9.6width 9.7wet P ####N/A 0.0width 0.0wet P ###37.8064118.22122 81.77878 0.8d max 0.4hyd radi ####N/A 0.0d max 0.0hyd radi ###48.7919317.54312 82.45688 1.6bank ht 21.3w/d ratio ####N/A 0.0bank ht 0.0w/d ratio ####N/A 17.0W flood prone area1.8ent ratio ####N/A 0.0W flood prone area0.0ent ratio ####N/A ####N/A ####N/A hydraulics ####N/A hydraulics ####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec) ####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) ####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) ####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) ####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) ####N/A 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* ####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) ####N/A ####N/A ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A ####N/A 79.5 80 80.5 81 81.5 82 82.5 83 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 2 -XS 98 Riffle --- 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 3 - XS 35 section:Tributary 3 - XS 36 Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 3 - XS 35 description:Tributary 3 - XS 36 height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft):100.00 omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n"notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n" ####017.55786 82.44215 20.4519.810.0 ####017.79732 82.20268 21.121.118.0 ####9.415187 17.58808 82.41192 79.55 80.2 ####8.020899 19.1369 80.8631 78.9 78.9 ####12.1233417.77705 82.22295 ####16.8648720.56734 79.43267 ####13.6740118.06104 81.93896dimensions ####23.0996321.10642 78.89359dimensions ####17.02431 19.80992 80.19008 2.2 x-section area 0.5 d mean ####25.04906 22.17381 77.82619 2.2 x-section area 0.4 d mean ####18.2724721.06171 78.93829 4.5width 4.9wet P ####26.5047321.32191 78.67809 5.0width 5.5wet P ####19.683821.26927 78.73073 0.8d max 0.4hyd radi ####30.5375520.71817 79.28183 1.1d max 0.4hyd radi ####21.9801720.48107 79.51893 1.5bank ht 9.1w/d ratio ####36.2880619.99403 80.00597 1.1bank ht 11.4w/d ratio ####24.88552 19.8046 80.1954 10.0 W flood prone area 2.2 ent ratio ####45.0675 19.61149 80.38851 18.0 W flood prone area 3.6 ent ratio ####33.10985 18.93697 81.06304 #####N/A ####42.45958 18.19894 81.80106 hydraulics #####N/A hydraulics #####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec)#####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec) #####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)#####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) #####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)#####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) #####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec)#####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) #####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)#####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*#####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* #####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)#####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) #####N/A #####N/A #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)#####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A #####N/A 78.5 79 79.5 80 80.5 81 81.5 82 82.5 83 0 51015202530354045 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 3 -XS 35 Riffle --- 77.5 78 78.5 79 79.5 80 80.5 81 81.5 82 82.5 05101520253035404550 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 3 -XS 36 Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 3 - XS 37 section: Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 3 - XS 37 description: height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft): omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n"notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevation bankfull top of bank (ft)slope (%)"n" ####018.4852 81.5148 21.5119.277.0 #####N/A ####5.054756 18.87995 81.12005 78.49 80.73 #####N/A 0 --- ####8.37851319.27226 80.72774 #####N/A ####11.1111421.397 78.603dimensions #####N/A dimensions ####13.97299 22.59784 77.40216 2.2 x-section area 0.5 d mean #####N/A 0.0 x-section area 0.0 d mean ####16.8195820.56533 79.43467 4.1width 4.7wet P #####N/A 0.0width 0.0wet P ####19.3392518.58442 81.41558 1.1d max 0.5hyd radi #####N/A 0.0d max 0.0hyd radi ####26.9351218.70213 81.29787 3.3bank ht 7.6w/d ratio #####N/A 0.0bank ht 0.0w/d ratio #####N/A 7.0 W flood prone area 1.7 ent ratio #####N/A 0.0 W flood prone area 0.0 ent ratio #####N/A #####N/A #####N/A hydraulics #####N/A hydraulics #####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec)#####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec) #####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)#####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) #####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)#####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) #####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec)#####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) #####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)#####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.00Froude number #####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*#####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* #####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)#####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) #####N/A #####N/A #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A check from channel material #####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)#####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A 0.000 Manning's n from channel material #####N/A #####N/A 77 77.5 78 78.5 79 79.5 80 80.5 81 81.5 82 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 3 -XS 37 Riffle --- 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 4 - XS 1 section:Tributary 4 - XS 9 Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 4 - XS 1 description:Tributary 4 - XS 9 height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft):100.00 omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n"notespt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n" ###014.52495 85.47505 17.1716.0812.0 ###0 16.1269 83.8731 17.2516.8170.0 ###8.907697 14.40894 85.5910682.8383.92 ###7.997065 16.13518 83.8648282.7583.19 ###14.168914.43886 85.56114 ###15.9654115.83619 84.16382 ###17.643415.06159 84.93842dimensions ###19.0432115.69819 84.30182dimensions ###21.11384 15.63167 84.36833 6.3x-section area 0.6d mean ###22.81313 17.26211 82.73789 6.3x-section area 1.0d mean ###23.3175517.527 82.473 9.9width 10.3wet P ###25.790519.22028 80.77972 6.1width 7.3wet P ###25.1462618.0478 81.9522 0.9d max 0.6hyd radi ###26.7689918.79489 81.20511 2.0d max 0.9hyd radi ###26.7183217.9522 82.0478 2.0bank ht 15.4w/d ratio ###29.4589516.81278 83.18722 2.4bank ht 5.9w/d ratio ###28.35396 17.94157 82.0584312.0W flood prone area1.2ent ratio ###34.39588 16.81266 83.1873470.0W flood prone area11.5ent ratio ###29.49803 17.80724 82.19276 ###40.59682 16.8268 83.1732 ###31.89178 17.75591 82.24409hydraulics ###46.98389 16.80681 83.19319hydraulics ###32.7775117.16199 82.83801 0.0velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec) ###34.2041716.0781 83.92191 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) ###37.1747415.1633 84.8367 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) ###39.1315214.62665 85.373350.00shear velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) ###40.7587113.79502 86.204980.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) ###43.2196813.01537 86.984630.00Froude number ####N/A 0.00Froude number ###44.2544912.75321 87.24679 0.0friction factor u/u*####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* ###46.42432 11.80429 88.19571 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) ###49.81493 10.65722 89.34278 ####N/A ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A ####N/A 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 4 -XS 1 Riffle --- 80.5 81 81.5 82 82.5 83 83.5 84 84.5 85 05101520253035404550 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 4 -XS 9 Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 4 - XS 11 section:Tributary 4 - XS 13 Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 4 - XS 11 description:Tributary 4 - XS 13 height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft):100.00 omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n"notespt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n" ###016.75967 83.24033 17.3117.0470.0 ###017.59963 82.40037 18.1817.4650.0 ###11.63319 16.99117 83.0088382.6982.96 ###5.698119 17.20829 82.7917181.8282.54 ###18.3354216.93619 83.06381 ###9.61580717.6443 82.3557 ###20.3882617.44287 82.55713dimensions ###13.4178618.40285 81.59715dimensions ###22.41096 18.00671 81.99329 6.3x-section area 0.7d mean ###15.49239 19.25516 80.74484 6.3x-section area 0.5d mean ###23.5977718.79614 81.20386 8.8width 9.5wet P ###17.0647419.1248 80.8752 11.7width 12.0wet P ###25.5023418.61882 81.38118 1.5d max 0.7hyd radi ###21.3899618.52193 81.47807 1.1d max 0.5hyd radi ###27.1109717.60532 82.39469 1.8bank ht 12.2w/d ratio ###29.5080317.46457 82.53543 1.8bank ht 21.8w/d ratio ###30.04076 17.03932 82.9606870.0W flood prone area8.0ent ratio ###39.81523 17.59167 82.4083350.0W flood prone area4.3ent ratio ###37.11263 16.72724 83.27276 ####N/A ###45.73354 16.75102 83.24899hydraulics ####N/A hydraulics ####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec) ####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) ####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) ####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) ####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) ####N/A 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* ####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) ####N/A ####N/A ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A ####N/A 81 81.5 82 82.5 83 83.5 84 84.5 05101520253035404550 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 4 -XS 11 Riffle --- 80.5 81 81.5 82 82.5 83 83.5 0 5 1015202530354045 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 4 -XS 13 Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Tributary 4 - XS 20 section:Tributary 4 - XS 26 Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Tributary 4 - XS 20 description:Tributary 4 - XS 26 height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft):100.00 omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n"notespt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n" ###017.44779 82.55221 18.8217.6625.0 ###017.30301 82.69699 20.0117.428.0 ###6.649672 16.00878 83.9912281.1882.34 ###7.981989 17.14916 82.8508479.9982.58 ###8.82417716.94755 83.05245 ###11.7147817.26887 82.73113 ###11.5295917.82619 82.17381dimensions ###13.1198517.63644 82.36356dimensions ###15.14761 18.63218 81.36782 6.3x-section area 0.7d mean ###14.81855 21.84423 78.15577 6.3x-section area 1.3d mean ###17.4359519.31952 80.68048 8.5width 9.2wet P ###15.9100121.85571 78.14429 4.8width 6.7wet P ###18.708520.12283 79.87717 1.5d max 0.7hyd radi ###17.579421.3916 78.6084 1.8d max 0.9hyd radi ###20.4345920.36042 79.63958 2.7bank ht 11.7w/d ratio ###19.3515319.57403 80.42597 4.4bank ht 3.7w/d ratio ###21.48874 19.5282 80.4718 25.0W flood prone area2.9ent ratio ###21.31121 18.34227 81.65773 8.0W flood prone area1.7ent ratio ###24.21538 18.88005 81.11995 ###24.09667 17.41581 82.58419 ###26.12828 17.66364 82.33636hydraulics ###26.98705 17.26639 82.73361hydraulics ###29.4147317.82275 82.17725 0.0velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec) ###34.8822517.34573 82.65427 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) ####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) ####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) ####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) ####N/A 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* ####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) ####N/A ####N/A ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A ####N/A 79 79.5 80 80.5 81 81.5 82 82.5 83 83.5 84 84.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 4 -XS 20 Riffle --- 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Tributary 4 -XS 26 Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Travis Creek - XS 55 section:Travis Creek - XS 57 Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Travis Creek - XS 55 description:Travis Creek - XS 57 height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft):100.00 omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n"notespt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n" ###019.08755 80.91245 22.2521.76160.0 ###018.04778 81.95222 22.68222.08140.0 ###27.90672 20.0818 79.918277.7578.24 ###17.96292 19.45854 80.5414677.31877.92 ###40.0912420.99685 79.00315 ###29.0617722.59997 77.40003 ###44.7266621.38204 78.61796dimensions ###41.2407523.20114 76.79886dimensions ###49.38256 22.74483 77.2551754.9x-section area 1.8d mean ###57.08316 23.72336 76.2766454.9x-section area 1.1d mean ###53.9533423.79749 76.2025130.0width 31.7wet P ###60.2480525.32455 74.6754551.7width 52.8wet P ###62.3614623.69306 76.30694 3.6d max 1.7hyd radi ###62.8739526.22018 73.77982 3.5d max 1.0hyd radi ###67.6126325.07537 74.92463 4.0bank ht 16.4w/d ratio ###67.9886525.09974 74.90026 4.1bank ht 48.7w/d ratio ###71.32685 25.80778 74.19222160.0W flood prone area5.3ent ratio ###72.31289 23.66343 76.33658140.0W flood prone area2.7ent ratio ###74.74007 24.94675 75.05325 ###78.87755 22.08494 77.91506 ###77.83161 21.76303 78.23697hydraulics ###89.59514 21.91403 78.08597hydraulics ###88.7560421.52864 78.47136 0.0velocity (ft/sec)###98.0592423.10316 76.89685 0.0velocity (ft/sec) ###101.044522.2616 77.7384 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)###105.036222.13921 77.86079 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) ###113.905121.10906 78.890940.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)###114.808421.57751 78.422490.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) ###129.512821.13204 78.867960.00shear velocity (ft/sec)###129.703722.17967 77.820330.00shear velocity (ft/sec) ###140.946220.72259 79.277410.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)###145.537322.03532 77.964680.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) ####N/A 0.00Froude number ###152.074721.71435 78.285650.00Froude number ####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* ####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) ####N/A ####N/A ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A ####N/A 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Travis Creek -XS 55 Riffle --- 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 0 20 40 60 80 100120140 160 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Travis Creek -XS 57 Riffle --- Cross Section Cross Section section:Travis Creek - XS 78 section:Travis Creek - XS 83 Riffle Riffle ------ ------ description:Travis Creek - XS 78 description:Travis Creek - XS 83 height of instrument (ft):100.00 height of instrument (ft):100.00 omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's omitdistanceFS FSFSW fpachannelManning's notes pt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n"notespt.(ft)(ft)elevationbankfulltop of bank(ft)slope (%)"n" ###020.84392 79.15609 22.4922.4968.0 ###024.88702 75.11298 24.9124.9140.0 ###10.44907 19.79385 80.2061577.5177.51 ###7.975341 24.91038 75.0896275.0975.09 ###18.3579319.22998 80.77003 ###12.8597224.66779 75.33222 ###27.4639918.46482 81.53519dimensions ###14.3763725.77771 74.22229dimensions ###34.82906 18.52792 81.4720854.9x-section area 1.3d mean ###17.60457 26.15249 73.84751 8.8x-section area 1.0d mean ###43.6198418.80885 81.1911542.5width 43.8wet P ###19.2289526.66931 73.33069 9.2width 10.1wet P ###53.0845721.22282 78.77719 3.3d max 1.3hyd radi ###20.1255525.84743 74.15258 1.8d max 0.9hyd radi ###59.3145922.957 77.043 3.3bank ht 32.8w/d ratio ###21.5690425.3774 74.6226 1.8bank ht 9.6w/d ratio ###65.16892 24.24289 75.7571268.0W flood prone area1.6ent ratio ###24.61759 23.6104 76.3896 40.0W flood prone area4.4ent ratio ###68.75002 25.70858 74.29142 ###29.22597 22.3226 77.6774 ###72.71671 25.76798 74.23202hydraulics ####N/A hydraulics ###77.1586625.61501 74.38499 0.0velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.0velocity (ft/sec) ###79.0625523.68871 76.31129 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs)####N/A 0.0discharge rate, Q (cfs) ###86.3243722.75673 77.243270.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq)####N/A 0.00shear stress ((lbs/ft sq) ###97.9632822.63785 77.362150.00shear velocity (ft/sec)####N/A 0.00shear velocity (ft/sec) ###104.198922.20506 77.794940.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec)####N/A 0.000unit stream power (lbs/ft/sec) ###10820.8 79.2 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.00Froude number ####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u*####N/A 0.0friction factor u/u* ####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm)####N/A 0.0 threshold grain size (mm) ####N/A ####N/A ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A check from channel material ####N/A 0measured D84 (mm)####N/A 0measured D84 (mm) ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.0relative roughness0.0fric. factor ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A 0.000Manning's n from channel material ####N/A ####N/A 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Travis Creek -XS 78 Riffle --- 73 73.5 74 74.5 75 75.5 76 76.5 77 77.5 78 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Width from River Left to Right (ft) Travis Creek -XS 83 Riffle --- Cr o s s S e c t i o n Cr o s s S e c t i o n se c t i o n : Tr a v i s C r - X S 3 3 se c t i o n : Tr a v i s C r - X S 4 3 Ri f f l e Ri f f l e -- - -- - -- - -- - de s c r i p t i o n : Tr a v i s C r - X S 3 3 de s c r i p t i o n : Tr a v i s C r - X S 4 3 he i g h t o f i n s t r u m e n t ( f t ) : 10 0 . 0 0 he i g h t o f i n s t r u m e n t ( f t ) : 10 0 . 0 0 o m i t d i s t a n c e F S FS F S W f p a c h a n n e l M a n n i n g ' s o m i t d i s t a n c e F S FS F S W f p a c h a n n e l M a n n i n g ' s no t e s p t . ( f t ) ( f t ) el e v a t i o n b a n k f u l l t o p o f b a n k ( f t ) s l o p e ( % ) " n " no t e s p t . ( f t ) ( f t ) e l e v a t i o n b a n k f u l l t o p o f b a n k ( f t ) s l o p e ( % ) " n " ## # # 0 1 8 . 6 2 4 0 3 81 . 3 7 5 9 7 18 . 5 6 1 8 . 5 6 2 0 0 . 0 ## # # 0 1 9 . 0 8 8 0 8 80 . 9 1 1 9 2 19 . 3 5 1 9 . 3 5 2 0 0 . 0 ## # # 11 . 3 7 5 5 2 18 . 1 3 4 1 6 81 . 8 6 5 8 4 8 1 . 4 4 8 1 . 4 4 ## # # 13 . 8 1 4 19 . 0 9 4 80 . 9 0 6 80 . 6 5 8 0 . 6 5 ## # # 21 . 2 5 1 4 1 8 . 1 4 7 7 2 81 . 8 5 2 2 9 ## # # 21 . 9 0 8 9 9 1 9 . 1 7 1 4 1 80 . 8 2 8 5 9 ## # # 26 . 6 5 7 3 4 2 2 . 2 7 1 0 5 77 . 7 2 8 9 5 d i m e n s i o n s ## # # 25 . 6 4 5 0 4 1 9 . 3 4 7 7 9 80 . 6 5 2 2 2 d i m e n s i o n s ## # # 32 . 1 9 6 2 5 23 . 0 5 7 8 5 76 . 9 4 2 1 5 8 0 . 1 x - s e c t i o n a r e a 3. 6 d m e a n ## # # 27 . 9 0 7 5 22 . 1 5 6 7 5 77 . 8 4 3 2 5 6 9 . 3 x - s e c t i o n a r e a 2. 9 d m e a n ## # # 36 . 1 7 8 5 6 2 2 . 6 4 3 6 2 77 . 3 5 6 3 8 2 2 . 5 w i d t h 26 . 8 w e t P ## # # 31 . 8 2 0 3 4 2 3 . 5 9 8 0 3 76 . 4 0 1 9 7 2 4 . 2 w i d t h 26 . 6 w e t P ## # # 40 . 0 3 2 8 2 2 3 . 0 6 6 1 76 . 9 3 3 9 4. 5 d m a x 3. 0 h y d r a d i ## # # 36 . 6 7 4 5 2 3 . 7 0 0 5 3 76 . 2 9 9 4 7 4. 4 d m a x 2. 6 h y d r a d i ## # # 42 . 3 1 3 5 1 2 3 . 0 5 1 5 2 76 . 9 4 8 4 8 4. 5 b a n k h t 6. 3 w / d r a t i o ## # # 39 . 8 1 7 8 3 2 2 . 6 9 6 9 6 77 . 3 0 3 0 4 4. 4 b a n k h t 8. 5 w / d r a t i o ## # # 44 . 2 9 4 2 18 . 5 6 0 6 5 81 . 4 3 9 3 5 2 0 0 . 0 W f l o o d p r o n e a r e a 8 . 9 e n t r a t i o ## # # 43 . 1 2 3 5 1 22 . 0 1 3 3 8 77 . 9 8 6 6 2 2 0 0 . 0 W f l o o d p r o n e a r e a 8 . 3 e n t r a t i o ## # # 49 . 4 8 4 5 18 . 4 1 0 7 2 81 . 5 8 9 2 8 ## # # 47 . 0 3 7 8 1 20 . 6 0 5 4 5 79 . 3 9 4 5 5 ## # # 56 . 8 9 4 9 4 18 . 5 5 5 6 1 81 . 4 4 4 3 9 h y d r a u l i c s ## # # 51 . 3 2 3 8 8 18 . 7 0 8 5 3 81 . 2 9 1 4 7 h y d r a u l i c s ## # # 61 . 9 0 7 5 9 1 8 . 4 6 1 9 8 81 . 5 3 8 0 2 0. 0 v e l o c i t y ( f t / s e c ) ## # # 57 . 5 5 9 2 8 1 8 . 4 7 1 5 2 81 . 5 2 8 4 8 0. 0 v e l o c i t y ( f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 d i s c h a r g e r a t e , Q ( c f s ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 d i s c h a r g e r a t e , Q ( c f s ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 s h e a r s t r e s s ( ( l b s / f t s q ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 s h e a r s t r e s s ( ( l b s / f t s q ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 s h e a r v e l o c i t y ( f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 s h e a r v e l o c i t y ( f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 0 u n i t s t r e a m p o w e r ( l b s / f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 0 u n i t s t r e a m p o w e r ( l b s / f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 F r o u d e n u m b e r ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 F r o u d e n u m b e r ## # # #N / A 0. 0 f r i c t i o n f a c t o r u / u * ## # # #N / A 0. 0 f r i c t i o n f a c t o r u / u * ## # # #N / A 0. 0 th r e s h o l d g r a i n s i z e ( m m ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 th r e s h o l d g r a i n s i z e ( m m ) ## # # #N / A ## # # #N / A ## # # #N / A ch e c k f r o m c h a n n e l m a t e r i a l ## # # #N / A ch e c k f r o m c h a n n e l m a t e r i a l ## # # #N / A 0 m e a s u r e d D 8 4 ( m m ) ## # # #N / A 0 m e a s u r e d D 8 4 ( m m ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 r e l a t i v e r o u g h n e s s 0 . 0 f r i c . f a c t o r ## # # #N / A 0. 0 r e l a t i v e r o u g h n e s s 0 . 0 f r i c . f a c t o r ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 0 M a n n i n g ' s n f r o m c h a n n e l m a t e r i a l ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 0 M a n n i n g ' s n f r o m c h a n n e l m a t e r i a l ## # # #N / A ## # # #N / A 767778798081828384858687 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 Elevation (ft) W i d t h f r o m R i v e r L e f t t o R i g h t ( f t ) Tr a v i s C r - X S 3 3 R i f f l e - - - 757677787980818283848586 0 1 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 Elevation (ft) W i d t h f r o m R i v e r L e f t t o R i g h t ( f t ) Tr a v i s C r - X S 4 3 R i f f l e - - - Cr o s s S e c t i o n Cr o s s S e c t i o n se c t i o n : Tr a v i s C r - X S 4 5 se c t i o n : Ri f f l e Ri f f l e -- - -- - -- - -- - de s c r i p t i o n : Tr a v i s C r - X S 4 5 de s c r i p t i o n : he i g h t o f i n s t r u m e n t ( f t ) : 10 0 . 0 0 he i g h t o f i n s t r u m e n t ( f t ) : o m i t d i s t a n c e F S FS FS W f p a c h a n n e l M a n n i n g ' s o m i t d i s t a n c e F S FS F S W f p a c h a n n e l M a n n i n g ' s no t e s p t . ( f t ) ( f t ) e l e v a t i o n b a n k f u l l t o p o f b a n k ( f t ) s l o p e ( % ) " n " no t e s p t . ( f t ) ( f t ) e l e v a t i o n b a n k f u l l t o p o f b a n k ( f t ) s l o p e ( % ) " n " ## # # 0 2 0 . 2 0 7 9 2 79 . 7 9 2 0 8 21 . 0 9 2 1 . 0 9 2 0 0 . 0 ## # # #N / A ## # # 14 . 3 1 4 3 9 20 . 6 0 7 7 3 79 . 3 9 2 2 7 7 8 . 9 1 7 8 . 9 1 ## # # #N / A 0 - - - ## # # 25 . 7 7 9 0 5 2 0 . 4 6 8 6 8 79 . 5 3 1 3 2 ## # # #N / A ## # # 35 . 9 2 7 9 9 2 1 . 0 9 4 9 9 78 . 9 0 5 0 1 d i m e n s i o n s ## # # #N / A di m e n s i o n s ## # # 42 . 0 5 1 5 4 23 . 4 9 4 7 1 76 . 5 0 5 2 9 5 5 . 9 x - s e c t i o n a r e a 2. 4 d m e a n ## # # #N / A 0. 0 x - s e c t i o n a r e a 0. 0 d m e a n ## # # 48 . 2 8 4 6 3 2 4 . 1 4 9 1 9 75 . 8 5 0 8 1 2 3 . 4 w i d t h 25 . 6 w e t P ## # # #N / A 0. 0 w i d t h 0. 0 w e t P ## # # 53 . 2 1 1 4 3 2 4 . 3 8 4 6 4 75 . 6 1 5 3 6 3. 5 d m a x 2. 2 h y d r a d i ## # # #N / A 0. 0 d m a x 0. 0 h y d r a d i ## # # 56 . 5 3 7 4 6 2 4 . 5 6 3 8 1 75 . 4 3 6 1 9 3. 5 b a n k h t 9. 7 w / d r a t i o ## # # #N / A 0. 0 b a n k h t 0. 0 w / d r a t i o ## # # 59 . 3 2 8 4 4 20 . 9 1 8 9 1 79 . 0 8 1 0 9 2 0 0 . 0 W f l o o d p r o n e a r e a 8 . 6 e n t r a t i o ## # # #N / A 0. 0 W f l o o d p r o n e a r e a 0 . 0 e n t r a t i o ## # # 61 . 7 1 7 6 5 19 . 8 2 8 80 . 1 7 2 ## # # #N / A ## # # 66 . 6 3 2 7 6 19 . 8 1 6 80 . 1 8 4 h y d r a u l i c s ## # # #N / A hy d r a u l i c s ## # # 71 . 2 4 8 1 2 1 9 . 8 4 8 4 5 80 . 1 5 1 5 5 0. 0 v e l o c i t y ( f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 v e l o c i t y ( f t / s e c ) ## # # 78 . 4 9 5 4 2 1 9 . 9 3 0 7 1 80 . 0 6 9 2 9 0. 0 d i s c h a r g e r a t e , Q ( c f s ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 d i s c h a r g e r a t e , Q ( c f s ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 s h e a r s t r e s s ( ( l b s / f t s q ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 s h e a r s t r e s s ( ( l b s / f t s q ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 s h e a r v e l o c i t y ( f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 s h e a r v e l o c i t y ( f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 0 u n i t s t r e a m p o w e r ( l b s / f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 0 u n i t s t r e a m p o w e r ( l b s / f t / s e c ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 F r o u d e n u m b e r ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 F r o u d e n u m b e r ## # # #N / A 0. 0 f r i c t i o n f a c t o r u / u * ## # # #N / A 0. 0 f r i c t i o n f a c t o r u / u * ## # # #N / A 0. 0 th r e s h o l d g r a i n s i z e ( m m ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 th r e s h o l d g r a i n s i z e ( m m ) ## # # #N / A ## # # #N / A ## # # #N / A ch e c k f r o m c h a n n e l m a t e r i a l ## # # #N / A ch e c k f r o m c h a n n e l m a t e r i a l ## # # #N / A 0 m e a s u r e d D 8 4 ( m m ) ## # # #N / A 0 m e a s u r e d D 8 4 ( m m ) ## # # #N / A 0. 0 r e l a t i v e r o u g h n e s s 0 . 0 f r i c . f a c t o r ## # # #N / A 0. 0 r e l a t i v e r o u g h n e s s 0 . 0 f r i c . f a c t o r ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 0 M a n n i n g ' s n f r o m c h a n n e l m a t e r i a l ## # # #N / A 0. 0 0 0 M a n n i n g ' s n f r o m c h a n n e l m a t e r i a l ## # # #N / A ## # # #N / A 757677787980818283 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 Elevation (ft) W i d t h f r o m R i v e r L e f t t o R i g h t ( f t ) Tr a v i s C r - X S 4 5 R i f f l e - - - 0 0. 1 0. 2 0. 3 0. 4 0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0. 6 0. 8 1 1.2 Elevation (ft) W i d t h f r o m R i v e r L e f t t o R i g h t ( f t ) Ri f f l e - - - We i g h t e d P e b b l e C o u n t Pe r c e n t R i f f l e : 50 Pe r c e n t R u n : Pe r c e n t P o o l : 50 Pe r c e n t G l i d e : Pe b b l e C o u n t , Ma t e r i a l S i z e R a n g e ( m m ) T o t a l # - - - si l t / c l a y 0 0 . 0 6 2 7 . 1 # # -- - ve r y f i n e s a n d 0 . 0 6 2 0 . 1 3 4 . 7 # # -- - fi n e s a n d 0. 1 3 0 . 2 5 1 9 . 1 # # No t e : Tr a v i s C r e e k - D o w n s t r e a m P r e c o n s t r u c t i o n S e d i m e n t D a t a me d i u m s a n d 0 . 2 5 0 . 5 1 4 . 3 # # co a r s e s a n d 0. 5 1 1 7 . 3 # # ve r y c o a r s e s a n d 1 2 1 5 . 8 # # ve r y f i n e g r a v e l 2 4 1 2 . 8 # # fi n e g r a v e l 4 6 5 . 6 # # fi n e g r a v e l 6 8 3 . 2 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 8 1 1 0 . 0 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 11 1 6 0 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 16 2 2 0 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 22 3 2 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 3 2 4 5 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 4 5 6 4 0 . 0 # # sm a l l c o b b l e 64 9 0 0 . 0 # # me d i u m c o b b l e 9 0 1 2 8 0 . 0 # # la r g e c o b b l e 1 2 8 1 8 0 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e c o b b l e 1 8 0 2 5 6 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 25 6 3 6 2 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 3 6 2 5 1 2 0 . 0 # # me d i u m b o u l d e r 5 1 2 1 0 2 4 0 . 0 # # la r g e b o u l d e r 1 0 2 4 2 0 4 8 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e b o u l d e r 2 0 4 8 4 0 9 6 0 . 0 # # be d r o c k 0. 0 # Si z e p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n ( m m ) P e r c e n t b y s u b s t r a t e t y p e We i g h t e d C o u n t : 10 0 D1 6 D 3 5 D 5 0 D 8 4 D 9 5 si l t / c l a y s a n d g r a v e l c o b b l e b o u l d e r b e d r o c k Tr u e T o t a l P a r t i c l e C o u n t : 12 6 0 . 1 4 6 0. 3 1 0 . 6 3 5 7 % 7 1 % 2 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0% 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 10 0 % 0. 0 1 0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Finer Than Pa r t i c l e S i z e ( m m ) Pe b b l e C o u n t , - - - Cu m u l a t i v e P e r c e n t Pe r c e n t I t e m Ri f f l e Po o l RunGlide We i g h t e d P e b b l e C o u n t Pe r c e n t R i f f l e : 50 Pe r c e n t R u n : Pe r c e n t P o o l : 50 Pe r c e n t G l i d e : Pe b b l e C o u n t , Ma t e r i a l S i z e R a n g e ( m m ) T o t a l # -- - si l t / c l a y 0 0 . 0 6 2 4 9 . 5 # # -- - ve r y f i n e s a n d 0 . 0 6 2 0 . 1 3 1 8 . 9 # # -- - fi n e s a n d 0. 1 3 0 . 2 5 1 7 . 2 # # No t e : Tr a v i s C r e e k - U T 1 - D o w n s t r e a m , P r e c o n s t r u c t i o n S e d i m e n t D a t a me d i u m s a n d 0. 2 5 0 . 5 7 . 2 # # co a r s e s a n d 0. 5 1 3 . 6 # # ve r y c o a r s e s a n d 1 2 3 . 6 # # ve r y f i n e g r a v e l 2 4 0 . 0 # # fi n e g r a v e l 4 6 0 . 0 # # fi n e g r a v e l 6 8 0 . 0 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 8 1 1 0 . 0 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 11 1 6 0 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 16 2 2 0 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 22 3 2 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 3 2 4 5 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 4 5 6 4 0 . 0 # # sm a l l c o b b l e 6 4 9 0 0 . 0 # # me d i u m c o b b l e 9 0 1 2 8 0 . 0 # # la r g e c o b b l e 1 2 8 1 8 0 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e c o b b l e 1 8 0 2 5 6 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 2 5 6 3 6 2 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 3 6 2 5 1 2 0 . 0 # # me d i u m b o u l d e r 5 1 2 1 0 2 4 0 . 0 # # la r g e b o u l d e r 1 0 2 4 2 0 4 8 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e b o u l d e r 2 0 4 8 4 0 9 6 0 . 0 # # be d r o c k 0. 0 # Si z e p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n ( m m ) Pe r c e n t b y s u b s t r a t e t y p e We i g h t e d C o u n t : 10 0 D1 6 D 3 5 D 5 0 D 8 4 D 9 5 si l t / c l a y s a n d g r a v e l c o b b l e b o u l d e r b e d r o c k Tr u e T o t a l P a r t i c l e C o u n t : 11 1 #N / A # N / A 0 . 1 0 1 4 9 % 5 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0% 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 10 0 % 0. 0 1 0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Finer Than Pa r t i c l e S i z e ( m m ) Pe b b l e C o u n t , - - - Cu m u l a t i v e P e r c e n t Pe r c e n t I t e m Ri f f l e PoolRunGlide We i g h t e d P e b b l e C o u n t Pe r c e n t R i f f l e : 50 Pe r c e n t R u n : Pe r c e n t P o o l : 50 Pe r c e n t G l i d e : Pe b b l e C o u n t , Ma t e r i a l S i z e R a n g e ( m m ) T o t a l # -- - si l t / c l a y 0 0 . 0 6 2 1 3 . 5 # # -- - ve r y f i n e s a n d 0 . 0 6 2 0 . 1 3 1 2 . 1 # # -- - fi n e s a n d 0. 1 3 0 . 2 5 2 0 . 2 # # No t e : Tr a v i s C r e e k - U T 1 - U p s t r e a m , P r e c o n s t r u c t i o n S e d i m e n t D a t a me d i u m s a n d 0. 2 5 0 . 5 8 . 8 # # co a r s e s a n d 0. 5 1 1 4 . 9 # # ve r y c o a r s e s a n d 1 2 7 . 0 # # ve r y f i n e g r a v e l 2 4 1 0 . 0 # # fi n e g r a v e l 4 6 3 . 2 # # fi n e g r a v e l 6 8 3 . 9 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 8 1 1 1 . 1 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 11 1 6 1 . 1 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 16 2 2 0 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 22 3 2 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 3 2 4 5 1 . 1 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 4 5 6 4 2 . 1 # # sm a l l c o b b l e 6 4 9 0 1 . 1 # # me d i u m c o b b l e 9 0 1 2 8 0 . 0 # # la r g e c o b b l e 1 2 8 1 8 0 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e c o b b l e 1 8 0 2 5 6 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 2 5 6 3 6 2 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 3 6 2 5 1 2 0 . 0 # # me d i u m b o u l d e r 5 1 2 1 0 2 4 0 . 0 # # la r g e b o u l d e r 1 0 2 4 2 0 4 8 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e b o u l d e r 2 0 4 8 4 0 9 6 0 . 0 # # be d r o c k 0. 0 # Si z e p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n ( m m ) Pe r c e n t b y s u b s t r a t e t y p e We i g h t e d C o u n t : 10 0 D1 6 D 3 5 D 5 0 D 8 4 D 9 5 si l t / c l a y s a n d g r a v e l c o b b l e b o u l d e r b e d r o c k Tr u e T o t a l P a r t i c l e C o u n t : 10 2 0 . 0 7 2 0 . 1 7 0 . 3 3 1 2 1 4 % 6 3 % 2 2 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0% 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 10 0 % 0. 0 1 0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Finer Than Pa r t i c l e S i z e ( m m ) Pe b b l e C o u n t , - - - Cu m u l a t i v e P e r c e n t Pe r c e n t I t e m Ri f f l e PoolRunGlide We i g h t e d P e b b l e C o u n t Pe r c e n t R i f f l e : 50 Pe r c e n t R u n : Pe r c e n t P o o l : 50 Pe r c e n t G l i d e : Pe b b l e C o u n t , Ma t e r i a l S i z e R a n g e ( m m ) T o t a l # -- - si l t / c l a y 0 0 . 0 6 2 6 8 . 5 # # -- - ve r y f i n e s a n d 0 . 0 6 2 0 . 1 3 1 7 . 1 # # -- - fi n e s a n d 0. 1 3 0 . 2 5 1 0 . 8 # # No t e : Tr a v i s C r e e k - U T 2 , P r e c o n s t r u c t i o n S e d i m e n t D a t a me d i u m s a n d 0. 2 5 0 . 5 3 . 6 # # co a r s e s a n d 0. 5 1 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e s a n d 1 2 0 . 0 # # ve r y f i n e g r a v e l 2 4 0 . 0 # # fi n e g r a v e l 4 6 0 . 0 # # fi n e g r a v e l 6 8 0 . 0 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 8 1 1 0 . 0 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 11 1 6 0 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 16 2 2 0 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 22 3 2 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 3 2 4 5 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 4 5 6 4 0 . 0 # # sm a l l c o b b l e 6 4 9 0 0 . 0 # # me d i u m c o b b l e 9 0 1 2 8 0 . 0 # # la r g e c o b b l e 1 2 8 1 8 0 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e c o b b l e 1 8 0 2 5 6 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 2 5 6 3 6 2 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 3 6 2 5 1 2 0 . 0 # # me d i u m b o u l d e r 5 1 2 1 0 2 4 0 . 0 # # la r g e b o u l d e r 1 0 2 4 2 0 4 8 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e b o u l d e r 2 0 4 8 4 0 9 6 0 . 0 # # be d r o c k 0. 0 # Si z e p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n ( m m ) Pe r c e n t b y s u b s t r a t e t y p e We i g h t e d C o u n t : 10 0 D1 6 D 3 5 D 5 0 D 8 4 D 9 5 si l t / c l a y s a n d g r a v e l c o b b l e b o u l d e r b e d r o c k Tr u e T o t a l P a r t i c l e C o u n t : 11 1 #N / A # N / A # N / A 0 0 6 9 % 3 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0% 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 10 0 % 0. 0 1 0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Finer Than Pa r t i c l e S i z e ( m m ) Pe b b l e C o u n t , - - - Cu m u l a t i v e P e r c e n t Pe r c e n t I t e m Ri f f l e PoolRunGlide We i g h t e d P e b b l e C o u n t Pe r c e n t R i f f l e : 50 Pe r c e n t R u n : Pe r c e n t P o o l : 50 Pe r c e n t G l i d e : Pe b b l e C o u n t , Ma t e r i a l S i z e R a n g e ( m m ) T o t a l # -- - si l t / c l a y 0 0 . 0 6 2 2 5 . 0 # # -- - ve r y f i n e s a n d 0 . 0 6 2 0 . 1 3 3 0 . 0 # # -- - fi n e s a n d 0. 1 3 0 . 2 5 2 0 . 0 # # No t e : Tr a v i s C r e e k - U T 4 P r e c o n s t r u c t i o n S e d i m e n t D a t a me d i u m s a n d 0. 2 5 0 . 5 9 . 0 # # co a r s e s a n d 0. 5 1 1 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e s a n d 1 2 4 . 0 # # ve r y f i n e g r a v e l 2 4 2 . 0 # # fi n e g r a v e l 4 6 0 . 0 # # fi n e g r a v e l 6 8 0 . 0 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 8 1 1 0 . 0 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 11 1 6 0 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 16 2 2 0 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 22 3 2 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 3 2 4 5 0 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 4 5 6 4 0 . 0 # # sm a l l c o b b l e 6 4 9 0 0 . 0 # # me d i u m c o b b l e 9 0 1 2 8 0 . 0 # # la r g e c o b b l e 1 2 8 1 8 0 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e c o b b l e 1 8 0 2 5 6 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 2 5 6 3 6 2 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 3 6 2 5 1 2 0 . 0 # # me d i u m b o u l d e r 5 1 2 1 0 2 4 0 . 0 # # la r g e b o u l d e r 1 0 2 4 2 0 4 8 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e b o u l d e r 2 0 4 8 4 0 9 6 0 . 0 # # be d r o c k 0. 0 # Si z e p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n ( m m ) Pe r c e n t b y s u b s t r a t e t y p e We i g h t e d C o u n t : 10 0 D1 6 D 3 5 D 5 0 D 8 4 D 9 5 si l t / c l a y s a n d g r a v e l c o b b l e b o u l d e r b e d r o c k Tr u e T o t a l P a r t i c l e C o u n t : 10 0 #N / A 0 . 0 8 0 . 1 1 1 2 5 % 7 3 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0% 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 10 0 % 0. 0 1 0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Finer Than Pa r t i c l e S i z e ( m m ) Pe b b l e C o u n t , - - - Cu m u l a t i v e P e r c e n t Pe r c e n t I t e m Ri f f l e PoolRunGlide Ma t e r i a l S i z e R a n g e ( m m ) T o t a l # -- - si l t / c l a y 0 0 . 0 6 2 9 . 4 # # -- - ve r y f i n e s a n d 0 . 0 6 2 0 . 1 3 7 . 4 # # -- - fi n e s a n d 0. 1 3 0 . 2 5 4 . 0 # # No t e : Ce d a r o c k R e f e r e n c e P e b b l e C o u n t me d i u m s a n d 0 . 2 5 0 . 5 2 . 5 # # co a r s e s a n d 0. 5 1 3 . 5 # # ve r y c o a r s e s a n d 1 2 4 . 5 # # ve r y f i n e g r a v e l 2 4 3 . 5 # # fi n e g r a v e l 4 6 7 . 4 # # fi n e g r a v e l 6 8 4 . 5 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 8 1 1 5 . 4 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 11 1 6 2 . 5 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 16 2 2 5 . 0 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 22 3 2 2 . 5 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 3 2 4 5 4 . 0 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 4 5 6 4 4 . 5 # # sm a l l c o b b l e 64 9 0 4 . 0 # # me d i u m c o b b l e 9 0 1 2 8 4 . 5 # # la r g e c o b b l e 1 2 8 1 8 0 7 . 9 # # ve r y l a r g e c o b b l e 1 8 0 2 5 6 2 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 25 6 3 6 2 1 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 3 6 2 5 1 2 2 . 0 # # me d i u m b o u l d e r 5 1 2 1 0 2 4 1 . 0 # # la r g e b o u l d e r 1 0 2 4 2 0 4 8 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e b o u l d e r 2 0 4 8 4 0 9 6 7 . 4 # # be d r o c k 0. 0 # Si z e p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n ( m m ) P e r c e n t b y s u b s t r a t e t y p e We i g h t e d C o u n t : 10 0 D1 6 D 3 5 D 5 0 D 8 4 D 9 5 si l t / c l a y s a n d g r a v e l c o b b l e b o u l d e r b e d r o c k Tr u e T o t a l P a r t i c l e C o u n t : 20 2 0 . 1 1 6 4. 0 8 9 . 8 1 6 1 2 5 6 8 9 % 2 2 % 3 9 % 1 8 % 1 1 % 0 % 0% 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 10 0 % 0. 0 1 0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Finer Than Pa r t i c l e S i z e ( m m ) Pe b b l e C o u n t , - - - Cu m u l a t i v e P e r c e n t Pe r c e n t I t e m Ri f f l e Po o l RunGlide We i g h t e d P e b b l e C o u n t Pe r c e n t R i f f l e : 50 Pe r c e n t R u n : Pe r c e n t P o o l : 50 Pe r c e n t G l i d e : Pe b b l e C o u n t , Ma t e r i a l S i z e R a n g e ( m m ) T o t a l # - - - si l t / c l a y 0 0 . 0 6 2 4 . 9 # # -- - ve r y f i n e s a n d 0 . 0 6 2 0 . 1 3 5 . 8 # # -- - fi n e s a n d 0. 1 3 0 . 2 5 9 . 7 # # No t e : Cr i p p l e C r e e k R e f e r e n c e R e a c h me d i u m s a n d 0 . 2 5 0 . 5 4 . 9 # # co a r s e s a n d 0. 5 1 9 . 7 # # ve r y c o a r s e s a n d 1 2 5 . 8 # # ve r y f i n e g r a v e l 2 4 6 . 8 # # fi n e g r a v e l 4 6 4 . 8 # # fi n e g r a v e l 6 8 8 . 7 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 8 1 1 7 . 8 # # me d i u m g r a v e l 11 1 6 1 . 9 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 16 2 2 4 . 9 # # co a r s e g r a v e l 22 3 2 5 . 8 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 3 2 4 5 7 . 7 # # ve r y c o a r s e g r a v e l 4 5 6 4 6 . 8 # # sm a l l c o b b l e 64 9 0 0 . 0 # # me d i u m c o b b l e 9 0 1 2 8 1 . 9 # # la r g e c o b b l e 1 2 8 1 8 0 1 . 9 # # ve r y l a r g e c o b b l e 1 8 0 2 5 6 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 25 6 3 6 2 0 . 0 # # sm a l l b o u l d e r 3 6 2 5 1 2 0 . 0 # # me d i u m b o u l d e r 5 1 2 1 0 2 4 0 . 0 # # la r g e b o u l d e r 1 0 2 4 2 0 4 8 0 . 0 # # ve r y l a r g e b o u l d e r 2 0 4 8 4 0 9 6 0 . 0 # # be d r o c k 0. 0 # Si z e p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n ( m m ) P e r c e n t b y s u b s t r a t e t y p e We i g h t e d C o u n t : 10 0 D1 6 D 3 5 D 5 0 D 8 4 D 9 5 si l t / c l a y s a n d g r a v e l c o b b l e b o u l d e r b e d r o c k Tr u e T o t a l P a r t i c l e C o u n t : 10 3 0 . 1 8 2 1 . 0 0 4 . 8 3 5 6 0 5 % 3 6 % 5 5 % 4 % 0 % 0 % 0% 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 10 0 % 0. 0 1 0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Finer Than Pa r t i c l e S i z e ( m m ) Pe b b l e C o u n t , - - - Cu m u l a t i v e P e r c e n t Pe r c e n t I t e m Ri f f l e Po o l RunGlide Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Appendices Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Appendix C Flood Frequency Analysis Data Ce d a r o c k R e f e r e n c e R e a c h Re t u r n In t e r v a l (y e a r s ) Di s c h a r g e (c f s ) 1. 3 27 1. 5 32 2 43 . 6 5 81 . 4 10 11 5 25 16 9 50 21 7 10 0 27 2 20 0 33 7 50 0 43 8 No t e : B o l d v a l u e s a r e i n t e r p o l a t e d . Cr i p p l e C r e e k R e f e r e n c e R e a c h Re t u r n In t e r v a l (y e a r s ) Di s c h a r g e (c f s ) 20 . 5 1 0 27 . 5 1 5 38 . 9 27 . 1 72 . 9 59 . 3 10 3 87 . 6 15 2 15 6 19 5 19 3 24 6 23 3 30 5 39 7 Re f e r e n c e R e a c h e s Fl o o d F r e q u e n c y A n a l a y s i s - R e g i o n a l R e g r e s s i o n E q u a t i o n ( U S G S 2 0 0 4 ) 050 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 30 0 35 0 40 0 45 0 50 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 Return Interval (years) Di s c h a r g e ( c f s ) Ce d a r o c k R e f e r e n c e R e a c h 050 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 0 Return Interval (years) Di s c h a r g e ( c f s ) Cr i p p l e C r e e k R e f e r e n c e R e a c h Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Appendices Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Appendix D Jurisdictional Determination Info U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id. SA"W-2014-01711 County: Alamance U.S.G.S. Quad. NC-Ossinee/Gibsonville NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Property Owner: Restoration Systems, LLC attn: Worth Creech Address:. 1101 Havnes Street. Suite 211 Raleigh, NC. 27604 Size (acres) 15 Nearest Town Elou Nearest Waterway Travis Creek River Basin Haw. North Carolina. USGS HUG 3030002 Coordinates 36.127740 N. -79.523669 W Location description: The site, called Aycock Springs, is located along an approximately 4760 foot of sections of Travis Creek and UTs to Travis Creek, in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Gibsonville OSSinee Road and Amick Road in Elan. Alamance County, North Carolina. Indicate Which of the Following Apply: A. Preliminary Determination X Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. B. Approved Determination There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 444 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. There are waters of the U -S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. _ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps. The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CW A jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years. _ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat sighed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be retied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. Page 1 of 2 The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). Youshould contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808-2808 to determine their requirements. Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David Bailey at 919-554-4884 ext 30 or David.E.Bailey2rt&i,,usace.army.m il. C. Basis For Determination: The proiect area exhibits water bodies with ordinary high water and wetland criteria as defined in the applicable regional supplement to the 1987 wetland delineation manual. The seater bodies on the site are listed in the attached table. This determination is based on a field verification by Davit! E. Bailev (USACE) on 5129/2014. D. Remarks: The wetlands and other Waters of the IIS on the provert]Lwere flagged by Axiom Environmental with changes made in the field by David E. Bailey (USAGE) and are approximated on the attached sheet titled "Jurisdictional Areas". dated April 2014. E. Attention USDA Program Participants This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site identified in this request_ The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1983. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B. above) This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR fart 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer 60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP, Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by NIA. **It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence." Corps Regulatory Official: Date: September 16, 2014 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, Iocated online at hqp://regulatory.usacesurvey.com/. Copy furnished: Scott Davis, Axiom. Environmental, Inc., 218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603 Sue Homewood, NCDENR-DWR, 585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem., NC 27107 OTIFICATION OF ADAII;NISTRATI4'F. APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND RE _ . . ,APPEAL ow Applicant-. Restoration Systems, LLC File Number: SAW -2014-01711 Date: September 16, 2014 Attached is: See Section below ❑ U41TIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) A ❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B ❑ PERMIT DENIAL C APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION I E SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above deciston. Additional information may be found at littp:/hvN%,%v.usace.arim°.niil/MissionslCiviIWorks/Rogulatoi-yPrograniandl'ennits.asL)x or Corps re lations at 33 CFR. Part 331. A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit. * ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this fornm and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the pen -nit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit docurnent and retum7m it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive a]I. rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal time denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the farm to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. • ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Comps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section li of this foram and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of thus notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable_ If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which play be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. SECTION lI - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN 1N1TI.AL PROFFERED PERMIT REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record. POLNT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may appeal process you may contact: also contact: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer attn: David E. Batley CE -SAD -PDO Raleigh Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 60 Forsyth Street, room IOM15' Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Atlanta, Georgia 34303-8801 Phone: (404) 562-5137 RICHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site dururg the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investiations. Date; Telephone number: Signature of appellant or agent. For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David Bailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, Ninth Carolina 28403 For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to: Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 64 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 Phone: (404) 562-5137 Jurisdictional Determination Request M US army Carps at Engineers Mm rgol QIstnd This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) Via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be found on-line at: http:, r\,.sa".usace.arm,,xnil Aiissionsilte rub laton PenniTProgram.aspx , by telephoning: 910-251-4633. or by contacting any of the field offices listed below: ASHEVILLE: REGLIL.ATORY FIELD OFFICE L15 Arm\ Corps k+I Iinginee rs 151 Patton :Avenue. Room 208 Asheville. North Carolina 28801-50L16 General Lumber: 18281.74-798(1 Fax Number: (828) 281-8120 RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE LIS Army Corps of Engineers 3331 l leritage I rade Drive. Suite 105 Wake Forest. North Carolina 27587 General Number: 1919)54;4--4883 Fax Nunther: (919) 562-0421 WASHINGTON REGULATOR)' FIELD OFFICE LIS .army Corps of ngineers 2407 West Fifth Street Wushhigton. North Carolina 27889 Ocneral Number: 191 (t) 251-4610 Fax Number: (252) 975-1399 WILMINGTON REG LILATORY FIELD OFFICE US .Army Corps of L'.ngincers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington. North Carolina 28403 Geneml Number: 91l1 -2a 14633 Fax Number: (9101) 251-4025 Version: December 2013 Page 1 jurisdictional Determination Request INSTRUCTIONS: All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F. NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND ,AGENCIiES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a paying client or your agency, pleases note the specific submittal requirements in Part G. NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request. NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOTJUSACE protocols. NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. Version: December 2013 Page 2 0 - jurisdictional Determination Request PARCEL INFORMATION Street Address: 3016 Amick Road City, State: Econ, NC 27244 Countv: Alamance Directions: Fmm 1-40 �aq iwj. i— ma laws Eon wul.-11y Dn tw 4A =as �4—pa wm, NC146 n.„ei a s mM aid lumW M14140nTT SL"L �I W+ ¢ e �k rtl Wm aEte riFla+uNa[saia Rum `aiaei' eQo ] ' ie aM me ilY a on m e rill Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 170380, 110136, 110189, 110190, 110223 B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION Name: Grant Lewis - Axiom Environmental Inc. Mailing Address: 218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, IVC, 27603 Telephone Number: 919-215.1693 Electronic Mail Addressl: glewls@axiomenvironmental,org Select one: 71 l am the current property owner. ® I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant' Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase Other. please explain. C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name: Gary B. and Pam M. Oakley Mailing Address: 3016 Amick Road Eton. NC 27244 Telephone Number: 336-516-0758 Electronic Mail Address: gmoaklayl C hotmail com Lv1 Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed. County +GISIParcel/Tax Record data) If available 2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization 'Form If available Version: December 2013 Page 3 Jurisdictional Determination Request D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTMCATION4 1. the undersigned. a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein. do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1949. *please see attached Agent Authorization farm Property Owner (please print) Date Property Owner Signature E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE Select One. I am requesting that the Corps provide a preiuninary JD for the property identified herein. This request does include a delineation. ❑V I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JI] for the property identified herein_ This request does NOT include a delineation. I arta requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or absence of WoUS' and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation. 1 am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all W oUS on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat). 1 am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted by others) on a property/project area and provide an a row v� (shay or may not include a survey plat). For NCDOT requests following the current NCiaOT/USAGE protocols, skip to part E. - Waters of the United States Version: December 2013 Page 4 F. jurisdictional Determination Request ALL REQCTESTS Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the area of evaluation. Size of Property or Project Area 15.9 acres FI verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marred or distinguishable. G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES (1) Preliminary JD Requests: 21 Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Farm .. ✓ Project Coordinates: 36.127148 Latitude -79.525245Longitude Maps (no lamer than 11 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay: I'r l Lame and small scale maps that depict. at minimum: streets, intersections. towns Aerial Photography of the project area R1 USG5 Topographic Map R1 Soil Survey Map Other Maps. as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map. Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps. LIDAR malas, FEMA floodplain maps) E See Appendix A of this Farm. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008 Version: December 2013 Page 5 jurisdictional determination Request Delineation Information (when applicable)': Wetlands: FV -1 Wetland Data Sheets Tributaries: ® USACE Assessment Forms W-1 Upland Data Sheets F-1 Other Assessment Forms (when appropriate) Landscape Photos, if taken Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes: ■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources. label and identify) ■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches ■ Locations of photo stations ■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources (2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation: F] Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude Maps (no larger than l I x 17) with. Project Boundary Overlay: F] Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns Aerial Photography of the project area USGS Topographic Map Soil Survey Map Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan. previous delineation maps) 7 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:. lettwww.usace_arrnr _mll/N4issions CtvilWorks Re ulator Pro ramanciPermits re su rJ,as r. Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at: httm/loortal ncdenr.or?—/Udocument library/aet file?utjid=76f3c58b-dab3-4960-ba43-45b71afO6f,tc&Qr�:iupIn=38364 and, http'1/www saw usace_arrrty.milJPortals/59/do s/rB ulatorvinubllcnatices/2013_IN(:$AM L)raft User Mar'rual 130318.pdf s Delineation Information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type. Version: December 2013 Page 6 jurisdictional Determination Request Delineation Information (when applicable): Wetlands: ❑ Wetland Data Sheets' Tributaries: ❑ USAOE Assessment Forms ❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ other Assessment Forms (when appropriate) ❑ Landscape Photos, if taken ❑ field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes: • All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify) • Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches Locations of photo stations Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only) ❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as -Rapanos Forms l") Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s), F-1 adjacency, etc. to navigable waters. 9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type. Version: December 2013 Page 7 jurisdictional Determination. Request L REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for review. Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard- copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17" (the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including those larger than 1 1 "x 17', may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable Document .Format (PDF) rile. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor. (l) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL 1-1 Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor 1-1 Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale) 71 Must be legible Must include a North Arrow. Scale(s), Title, Property Information Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and bounds/CPS coordinates ofall surveyed delineation points Must clearly depict surveyed property or protect boundaries ® Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property corner. USGS monument) QWhen wetlands are depicted: • Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons + Must identify each wetland polygon using, an alphanumeric system Version:. December 2013 Page 8 Jurisdictional Determination Request When tributaries are depicted: • Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marrs (aH WM) of tributary • Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system • Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate widths or surveyed OHWM) • Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic neap) or. when no USGS name exists. identify as "unnamed tributary'. ❑ all depicted WoUS ("etland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tic -to surveyed project/property boundaries Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches ❑ Must Include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all �Na[ers not currently subiect to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non - jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to mare an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not jurisdictional. Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes. culverts. etc.) that transport WoU5 Version: December 2013 Page 9 jurisdictional Determination Request (2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE ❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary, i�picted- include the following Corps Certification language: "This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change in the low or our published regulations, the determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." Regulatory Official: Title: Date: USACE Action ID No.: When uplands may be plesent v� ithin a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary: include the following Corps Certification language: 'This certifies that this copy of this plot identifies all areas of waters of the United States regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the low or our published regulations, this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this dote. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." Regulatory Official: Title: Do te: USACE Action ID No.: Version: December 2013 Page 10 Jurisdictional Determination Request (3) GPS SURVEYS For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include all of the above, as well as: Fbe at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.. © include an accuracy verification: One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and bounds). Finclude a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized. Version: December 2013 Page 11 NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM Property Legal Description Alamance County, NarLh Carolina Parcel ID Plumber Deed Book Deed Page 170390 110136 2832 0522 1632 729 110189 2468 268 110190,110223 I 935 1 328 I Street Address: 3016 Amick Road, Elon. NC 27244 Property Owner (please print: +Gat]+ M. Oaks- — Property Owner (please print): Pamela B. Oakl - The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above property, do hereby authorize Restoration Systems, LLC Full Delivery Provider, the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and the US Army Corps of Engineers, their employees, agents or assigns to have reasonable access to the above referenced property for the evaluation of the property as a potential stream, wetland and/or riparian buffer mitigation project, including conducting stream and/or wetland determinations and delineations, as well as issuance and acceptance of any required permit(s) or certification(s). Property Owners(s) Address: (if different from above) Property Owner Telephone Number: 336-516-0758 I/We hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge. (Property Owner Authorized Signature (Date) (Property weer Authorized S nature) (//gate) A TTA CHMFN T A PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILENAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE ATTACKED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERB©DIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: Alamance Courcy City: -,Ear E," Center coordinates of site (latllong in degree decimal format) Lat. 36.127146 °N; Long. -79525245 Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Travis creek KTJ Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non -wetland waters: -5226 linear feet: -9 ft avg. 3 ft mea" width (ft) and/or , , acres. Cowardin Class: R3UB2. R3ua213, R4sB415 Stream Flow: Perennial (-5487 linear feet). Intermittent (-199 linear feet) Wetlands: 171 acres. Cowardin Class: PSS1A. PSS1C. PEM2C. PF01C Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: n;a Non -Tidal: r''a E REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination, Date(s): SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply _ checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): 1 Maps, pians, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the a ppIicanUconsultant: ©ssippee. NC (1970) and Gibsonville, INC X1970) 7.5-minutequadrangles Y/1 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the app nticonsultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. 11 Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps ❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Soil survey of Alamance County ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:. ❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑� Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): ❑ Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: Other information (please specify): 2 or 1 The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site. and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless. the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit. or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following. (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary: (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable: (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States,. and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further. an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(x)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site. the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information. IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations. Signature and gate of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) 4 Signature and date of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) SAMPLE Estimated amount of Class of Site Latitude Longitude Cowardin aquatic aquatic number Class resource in resource review area 1 0.1 acre Non -section 10 — non -wetland 2 100 linear feet Non-section10 — wetland 3 15 square feet Non -section 10 — wetland _ 4 0.01 acre Non -section 10 — non -wetland Estimated amount of Site Number/ Feature Cowardin aquatic resource in Class of aquatic Name Latitude Longitude Class review area resource Non -Section 10, Travis Creek 36.127128 -79.525233 R3UB2 2519 linear feet Non -wetland R45B4/5 Non -Section 10, UT1 to Travis Creek 36.127385 -79.521151 1179 linear feet R3UB2/3 Non -wetland Non -Section 10, UT2 to Travis Creek 36.127743 -79.521715 R3UB2/3 723 linear feet. Non -wetland Non -Section 10, UT3 to Travis Creek 36.128554 -79.525881 R4SB4/5 164 linear feet Non -wetland Non -Section 10, UT4 to Travis Creek 36.129647 -79.527292 R3UB2/3 426 linear feet Nan -wetland Non -Section 10,Non-wetland UT5 to Travis Creek 36.128414 -79.526411 R45B4/5 105 linear feet Non -Section 10,Non-wetland UT6 to Travis Creek 36.125048 -79.524221 R3UB2 110 linear feet Nan -Section 10,Wetland Wetland W1 36.129554 -79.527251 PSS1A 0.352 acre Non -Section 1p,Wetland Wetland W2 36.128678 -79.526154 PSS1C 0.434 acre Non -Section 10,Wetland Wetland W3 36.128647 -79.526790 PEM2C 0.004 acre Section 10, Non-Section Wetland W4 36.128495 -79.526662 PEM2C 0.010 acre Non -Section 10, Wetland W5 36.128302 -79.526128 PEM2C 0.031 acre Wetland Non -Section 1p,Wetland Wetland W6 36.128022 -79.525551 PEM2C 0.006 acre Non -Section 10,Wetland Wetland W7 36.127299 -79.525118 PSS1C 0.079 acre Non -Section 10, Wetland W8 36.125981 -79.524687 PF01C 0.069 acre Wetland Non -Section 10,Wetland Wetland W9 36.125290 -79.524213 P551C 0.101 acre Nan -Section 10,Wetland Wetland WI0 36.128370 -79.521933 PSS1A 0.008 acre Non -Section 10,Wetland Wetland W11 36.128375 -79.521007 PSS1A 0.004 acre Non -Section 10,Wetland Wetland W12 36.128253 -79.521057 PSS1A 0.002 acre Non -Section 1.0, Wetland W13 36.12741$ -79.521352 PSS1A 0.609 acre Wetland I I i Church Street 8 7 H i g h w a y Burlin g t o n R o a d Carmon Roa d El o n - O s s i p p e R o a d Web b Ave n u e B ethe l C h u r c h Ro a d Cu l l e n R o a d D u r h a m S t r e e t Howerton Road Amick R o a d NC - 1 0 0 H ig h w a y N C - 6 1 H i g h w a y Fri e d e n C h u r ch R o a d Cot ton R o a d Bell Road M a n n i n g S t r e e t Mc I n t yr e R o a d Wag o n e r R o a d Gerringer Mil l R o a d Low e R o ad E n d w e l l R o a d Pitt Road Co u n t y F a r m R o a d Barber R o a d Kivette House Road Eagl e s f i e l d R o a d Kea n s b u r g R o a d Whitsett Pa r k R o a d Power Line Road Fr a n k R o a d Phibbs Roa d Fernway Road Dow Drive N C - 6 1 H i g h w a y Alamance County, NC Title: Prepared for: Notes: Background Imagery sources(provided by ESRI Data andMaps):1. Physical Map of the UnitedStates (2009) created by theU.S. Park Service (upper inset).2. Delorme World Basemapdigital mapping (2010, lowerinset).3. Burlington, NC (1980),Lake Burlington, NC (1969),Gibsonville, NC (1970), andOssipee, NC (1970) 7.5-minute topographicquadrangles provided by theU.S. Geological Survey. Project Location Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Project: FIGURE Drawn by: Date: Scale: Project No.: SGD Apr 2014 As Shown 14-006 §¨¦40101230.5 Miles Legend Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site County lines 1 AL A M A N C E C O U N T Y Gi b s o n v i l le - O s s i p e e R o a d !. £¤70 ¬«100 k k μ ¬«87 ¬«54 ¬«87 ¬« 87 Directions to the Site from Interstates 40/85 in Burlington/Elon, NC:- Exit onto University Drive (I-40/85 Exit 140) and travel north (toward Elon)- Travel north for 2.8 miles and merge with NC 100- Continue on University Drive (NC 100) for 0.5 mile and turn left onto Manning Street (SR 1503)- Travel northwest for 0.8 mile and turn right onto Gibsonville-Ossipee Road (SR 1500)- Travel north for 0.7 mile and Site is on the right Aycock SpringsStream and Wetland Mitigation Site 36.127271 N-79.525214 W GIBSONVILLE WHITSETT ELON BURLINGTON GU I L F O R D C O U N T Y §¨¦85 Alamance County, NC Title: Prepared for: Notes: Background Imagery source:1. Ossippee, NC (1970), andGibsonville, NC (1970) 7.5-minute topographic quadranglesprovided by the US GeologicalSurvey (left window).2. Soil Survey of AlamanceCounty (page 9), providedby the Natural ResourcesConservation Service, USDepartment of Agriculture(right window). Project Area Mapping Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Project: FIGURE Drawn by: Date: Scale: Project No.: 2 SGD APR 2014 1:4800 14-006 2000200400600100 Feet Legend Project area ³ 6 0 0 62 0 6 4 0 6 2 0 6 2 0 6 2 0 6 4 0 6 0 4 608 612 616 596 6 2 4 628 632 636 59 2 6 4 4 6 24 636 644 6 4 4 59 6 632 6 1 6 616 62 8 592 Amick Road Gi b s o n v i l l e O s s i p e e R o a d Piedm o n t A v enue Alamance County, NC Title: Prepared for: Notes:1. Background Imagery source:2010 aerial photographyprovided by the NC OneMapProgram (online, supported bythe NC Geographic InformationCoordination Council). 2. 4-foot elevation contours aregenerated from 2007 LightDistance and Ranging (LiDAR)data generated by the NCFloodplain Mapping Programand provided by the NCDepartment of Transportation. Jurisdictional Areas Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Project: FIGURE Drawn by: Date: Scale: Project No.: 200 0 200 400 600100 Feet ³ Legend Project area Jurisdictional streams Jurisdictional wetlands !(Field-located data point 4-foot elevation contours NCDOT roads 4 SGD APR 2014 1:2400 14-006 Travis Creek Travis Creek UT4 to Travis Creek UT3 to Travis Creek UT5 to Travis Creek UT2 to Travis Creek UT1 to Travis Creek Wetland W1 Wetland W2 Wetland W3 Wetland W4 Wetland W5 Wetland W6 Wetland W7 Wetland W8 Wetland W9 Wetland W10 Wetland W11 Wetland W12 Wetland W13 UT6 to Travis Creek G✓rr�a.✓o l✓A WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont 2<_ IV Projectisile: +� �f /,"=::j,CilylGounty: '�'' �`�c Sampling Date: Applicanvowner: � lr r 1 ;'�L� 1' State: I�IC Sampling Point: G� Invesligator(s): _ :1,;',- Seciion, wns (Range: 6"0.,f SF ` Landform (hillstope, terrace, etc.): H114 ; 6' Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope Subregion (LRR or MLRA): l ff C Lat: l Long: -7Z 5 27qW r -f Datum:: s Soil Map Unit Name: Alai !- I NWI classification: 19<r Are climatic 1 hydrolo�ic condition on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegelalian ,Sail , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances` present? Yes No Are Vegetation _ . Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (I(needed. explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No � Is the Sampled Area )1 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No h` Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks' HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required Primary Indic9tgrk (minimum of one is required' check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) i Surface Water (At) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) — Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (810) Saturation (A3) — Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ! Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mal or Crust (134) Other (Explain In Remarks) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (131) Iron Deposits (115) ! Geomorphic Position (132) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) — Shallow Aquitard (03) T Water -Stained Leaves (89) ! Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC -Neutral Test (135) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches). / Water Table Presents Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) - Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. SamplingPoint: Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size. j % Qqver 5oecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3- Species Across All Strata: J (B) 4. 19tZi % Cover of: Multiply 5. OBL species x 1 6. x 2 FAC species D 7. FACU species x 4 = s UPL species tit x 5 = 10 31 ID Column Totals; {'� (A) 23' (B) = Total Cover SaolinalShrub Stratum (Plot size ) i 2. 3. 4, S 6. 7. 8- 9. 10 = Total Cover Herb Strateam (Plot size: ) A 3. 4./- 5 /�Ln t/fi+ r f✓�f 5 ✓.�1� r sl�jE 7 8 9, - 10. 11. 12. _ 72- = Total Cover Woadv Vine Stratum (Plot size ) 1 2. r 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate 't� Ar't'✓�, I'`1", Pcrizt��o Percent of Dominant Species [ T� That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: i (AIS) Prevalence Index worksheet: 19tZi % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 FACW species I x 2 FAC species D x 3 = + FACU species x 4 = ` UPL species tit x 5 = 10 31 ID Column Totals; {'� (A) 23' (B) Prevalence Index = BIA = U, 2 ~ y-4� Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation _ 2 - Dominance Test is X50°/ _ 3 - Prevalence index is 53.0' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probiemalic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DSH), regardless of height. 5aplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less then 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 fl (1 m) tall. Herb -- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytfc Vegetation f Present? Yes _ _ No 4,tI ! ._st ,C/,C:aP ,"1i "�� ' Z7S'%.'W r7L (It rvd1CILCe A'"¢6,<, IJ;j C"- Y �� C�1r%r✓"' 1 v��./f%Lf� trr�l�g�r ��e ,f/�.✓�r��r• �/"7C�Yy� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: 6fZO 5 .sem Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features p r—, finches)__ Color (moist) % Color [-moist) N Loc` Texture Remarks 'T e. C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM- Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (At) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black H stic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mlnefal (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy G€eyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks 0-3, .3, 014212, c Dark surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depteted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F6) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N. MLRA 136) Limbric Surface IF 13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) 1� "C/C L Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': 2 cm Muck (Al D) (MLRA 147) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Snails (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Daren( Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wettand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No fort I /p/ f.�'faJ7 S Lr r%A v A�[fJr�Loc r 7I.lCt" US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version �-/2 �'� z7T /2 I 7, �/,,f l ,� l ,s -/ 9 ' 7T / f / �? � -fir ms % �-,rr — zz--> r C 'T e. C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM- Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (At) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black H stic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mlnefal (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy G€eyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks 0-3, .3, 014212, c Dark surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depteted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F6) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N. MLRA 136) Limbric Surface IF 13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) 1� "C/C L Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': 2 cm Muck (Al D) (MLRA 147) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Snails (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Daren( Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wettand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No fort I /p/ f.�'faJ7 S Lr r%A v A�[fJr�Loc r 7I.lCt" US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/site. �12c�&- CitylCounly: r sampling Date: Applicant/Owner„rr��F` 1Q State: � Sampling Point 7_27,,: a” Investigator(s): / .1c,14 . dwf cam+ rl Seetia .Tow sp. Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,):J/I,t �c- er Local relief (concave, convex, none): C -0 -- Slope r -r Subregion (LRR or MI_rRA//): Lat: i2 17� Long: -J 2 7, yy.:2, Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: WOl/Sr�'y ��Bvaf� + NWI classification: Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �! No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (I( needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes f No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: 5ecpndary Indicators [minimum of two required) Primary Indicalors (minimum of one is re+auire check all that apply) _ surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ! Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _5'-,9igh Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Drainage Patterns (1516) Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (816) Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (152) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (83) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (Ba) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (02) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ 5haflow Aquitard (D3) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (04) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neulral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): r Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No — Depth (inches): /2- "2Saturation 17, No SaturationPresent? Yes Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes o includes ca ills Erin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.411 Sampling Paint: %Z7. /7,,E�r Absolute Dominant Indicator Dornjnance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: Coves, Status Number of Dominant Species 1, That Are OBI-, FACW, or FAC: 2.- - Total Number of Dominant 3, Species Across All Strata: 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5- That Are DBL, FACW, or FAC. 6. 7. 8 = Total Cover Sapl nglShrub Stratum [Plot size: ) 1. ✓ 1.f /9GI t _ f Q 2. �* 3. 4. 5. " 6. 7. 9. 10. = Total Cover Hgrb ., lu (Piot size: ) I awl-/'( e 2 07 r 0 (A) 'W (AA3) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: MUlliDIV bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 FAC species x3= - FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B1A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Tesl is >50% _~ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide suppgrting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) " 3. { _�J IInocators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 4 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. 6. - 7. 9. 10. 11. 12. _ = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plat size' ) t 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Total Cover Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet ) Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardleSts of height. Saplinshrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 31 DBH and greater than 3.28 R (i m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tail Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Li 2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators,) Depth h4 rix Redox Features iinchesi Cotler (moist) °;, Color (moist) % Tvoe Loci Texture _ Remarks Hydric Solt Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Hislic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) 12 11t 7L /ted z /-7 c Hydric Solt Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Hislic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) _ Stratified Layers (AS) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (176) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) _i Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Depressions (F8) _ tither (Explain In Remarks) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N. Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) — Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and — Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils IF 19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type Depth (inches): Remarks, Hydric Soil 'Present? Yes i No 10 '. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version M6 -r",79 V 14 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project)Site: %ye'-'C.P( f CitylCounty: rW `r Sampling Date: ¢` 5 Applicant/Owner: o✓ -?j_ I State: Sampling Point: �'Z_2 7 ,e Investigator(s): > orf w/ Section, T wnsi Range: - Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope Subregion (LRR or MLRA):r /31' LMt 129 1<5— Long: ^ 79 5- Soil Map Unit Name; � °t °f`im" L NWI classification: Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Z No (If no, explain in Remarks.) / Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes f No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ' Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reou red] Priaan+ Indicators (minimum of one is reguired: check all that aoalv) f Surface Soil Cracks (66) _ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (614) ` Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (6$) — High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) J Moss Trim Lines (616) Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Craytish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (64) — Other (Explain in Remarks) � Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (02) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Microtopographic Relief (04) Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC -Neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fri'n e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point Absolute Dominant indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree �tralum (Plot size: ) % COV!2r Saecies? S19WS Number of Dominant Species �� c ¢.� F tt i c � That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: (A) 2. - Total plumber of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: (al 4 Percent of Dominant Spades r� 5 That Are 08L, FACW, or FAC: (A18) 5. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 I ° f: Multiply by 8. = Total Cover OBL species x t = Sapling/shrub Stratum (Plot size: } FACW species x2= 1. �� 'y / FAC species x 3 = 2. FACT I species x 4 = 3. UPL species x 5� 4 Column Totals: ii4py (B) 5 Prevalence index = BfA = - S. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. - 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. _ 2. Dominance lest is 554°/4 9. 3 - Prevalence index is Q.0' 14. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' {Provide supporting = Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet} f(Plot size: } t�'✓C� �� , �- � _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) t � r } 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. - Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 6. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 7 height. 8• SaplingfShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less g. than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 h (1 m) (all. 14. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 n tall. 12. Woody vine --All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in =Total Gover height. Wo Vi e Str m (Plot size: ) % A-) f 3 4, Hydrophytic 5. Vegetation l , 6. Present? Yes No r = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: � 2_?;;, Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Red!2x F!2atures_ flnchesl --Color (moist) y Colorimoi5tl °'o Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks 'Type C=Concentration, D=De Ietion, R_M=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains_. "Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': — liistosol (Al) Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A 10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) !Slack Histic (A3) i Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) i Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) — Depleted Clark Surface (F7) _ Veep Shallow Dark Surface JF 12) i Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) — Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) — Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 135, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _i Strapped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic, Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type. Depth (inches): Hydric Soil. Present? 'Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmonl - Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont z r ProjecUSrte: &.>r&.>r k.f ^°'�%� CitylCounty: `"^� Sampling Pate: V 2 t7 Applicant/Owner: � �' ' 'rt 3r� + � f Stale; tzc Sampling Point: 1 V Investigator(s): rV 'r% f itfi'I% C NSI Section, wnship,,, ange: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): f Irak Local relief (concave, convex, none): CO�✓c'""--f Slope (%): r 4&, tz /' 3 5� % Long: Dalum: Subregion (LRR yr MLRA): +_ Lat: Soil Map Unit Name: 4Z(,,, !ft t L_,4 ( ' I✓t NWI classification: Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks ) Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology _ _ _ significantiy disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reQuiredl Primary Indicators fminirnuM of one is required check all that apply) ,Surface Soil Cracks (66) — Surface Water (At) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) — High Water Table (A2) = ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) _ ©xidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___ Moss Trim Lines (1316) i Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) i Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) — Crayfish Burrows (CS) Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131) Iron Deposits (135) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _, Shallow Aquilard (03) Water -Stained Leaves (Bg) Microtopographic Relief (134) Aquatic Fauna (813) /� PAC -Neutral Test (DS) Field observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): D Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (Inches): 'd Saturation Present? Yes No >'d Depth (inches): ✓ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 1 No includes ca ilia fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring Well, aerial photos, previous inspections), it available: Remarks. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: i % Cover Species7 Status 1. 2. 3. 4.- 5- 6. .5.6. 7. 8 Sampling Point: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: /&-J (A`B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover = Total Cover Sao[inalShrub OBL species'' Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. x 2 =Q 2. FAC species .3 3. FACU species , x4= - 4. Z x 5 = 7' Column Totals. 5. {B) 2'7 6. Prevalence Index = B1A = 7 8. 9. - 10 = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 2. C vll.d �If+2 l�aGaa 3. & .s, f sevj ,pc. 5 ,4 0 (-A C -rbc Sampling Point: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: /&-J (A`B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by= OBL species'' x t _ FACW species x 2 =Q tJ� FAC species .3 FACU species , x4= UPL species Z x 5 = 7' Column Totals. �, 2 (A) {B) 2'7 2' Prevalence Index = B1A = Wydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _f 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.{}' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, untess disturbed or problematic: Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 6_ ? Tree 7 C-,4- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) orH), � ✓ � �/ more or n diameter at breast height (CBregardless of height. 8. 9. 1 t}. 19. 12. K�Z = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 5aplinglShrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in CBF# and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 R la If. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 fl. in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point. C /3 7 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features ljnches) Color (moist) % - Color (moist] % Tvoe l oc Texture Remark 6- 7 r �Ay r- C 61 6/ z y7 /ter C Hydric ,oil Indicators: Histosol (Al) _ Hislic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Hislic (A3) — Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type Depth (inches) Remarks: sduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. '?Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Malnx Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present. unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'': Dark Surface (57) — 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Polyvatue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Souls (F19) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Materia# (TF2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present. unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: ' '�1 ,( CitylCounty: ' Sampling Date: AppiicanVOwner: State: ` Sampling Paint: �3 [� _Dr g mvestgator(s): /� �'� �f//S '"'r Sectit�ri, T'ownshi an e: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):/ i' Lf f Local relief (concave, convex, none): t�ov,/.` Slope Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: �� 28 Long: —7'' �� {± � Datum: Soil Map Unit Mame: _ / / � JCCVOWL � �" /" � NWI classification - Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes - � No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation . Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances' present? Yes _ No Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ,within a Wetland? No No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks' - HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators-. Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary indicators (minimum of one is rnuired check all that aoL)ly) — Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Surface Water (Al) T True Aquatic Plants (814) — Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ High Water Table (A?) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Drainage Patterns (810) Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (Bili) _! Water Marks (81) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C5) , Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drill Deposits (83) Thin Muck Surface (C7) — Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) — Shallow Aquitard (D3) _Inundation Water -Stained Leaves (53) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC -Neutral Test (05) Field observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No epth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No pth (inches): r Saturation Present? Yes_ No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe)_ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available. Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: !_^_ Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) U5 Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Slraturo (Plot size. } �1� over Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are ©BL. FACW, or FAC'. (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: '` (B) 4. - Percent of Dominant Species �- 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:, (A/B) 6._ - Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. _ Total % Cover of: _ Multiply by: 8. = Totat Coyer CBL species x 1 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x2= 1 3=2 FAC species x3- 2, FACU spades x 4 3. // UPL species '— x fi = 4. Column Totals:- (A) L1� (B) Prevalence Index = t31A = 3 iY 7 - 6. - Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. - 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. - 2 - Dominance Test ,<is °% 9. — 3 -Prevalence Index is 53:0' 10. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting= Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 1 ,] tt `w"' ✓e V JF � t 'Indicators of hydric soil and wettand hydrology must 3. /" be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. S%/'� �f�W [ of jig V/ Z"b a ,tea Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 6 more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 7. height. 8. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 9. than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall 10. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants. regardless 11 of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in =Total Cover height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. ) 1. 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic 5 Vegetation � g Present"? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) U5 Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: r3 Profile Description; (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features_-_ �iincues) _ Color (moist) °a Calor (moist) % Tvae LoC" Texture Fte�riBrkS 2 Id Z o9 RM=Reduced Matrix Hydric Soii Indicators: Histosol (Al) Hislic Epipedon (A2) — Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) = Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): TVDe Depth (inches): Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (MLRA 147, 149) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (173) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) _ Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19) (MLRA 149) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 136, 147) — Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and watland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Projecusite: / V /r%_" City/County: / V '�' Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: f''JL�"rr. �%�� _ Slate: 1-1/Sampling Point: Investigator(s): I�ns_� , " - / +' -fir '_f Section. T Range: � ✓% y f Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc..)): ru</� Local relief (concave, convex, none): " Slope Subregion (LRR or MLRA): J Lal: 3 . /2- ;?,,-2'r Long: " 719 521-1 po I n Datum: 5o6Y Map unit Name' Clr f'"' �* �'' ° s:Ist NWI classification:y 6� 2 Are climatic Y hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes o I within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 1 Remarks HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: 5qLcondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) Primary Indicator; [mjnimum of one is reouirgd: check all that aoptvl — Surface Soil Cracks (86) i Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (1110) Saturation (A3) ---Clxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ! Moss Trim Lines (616) _ Water Marks (61) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ! Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _'Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (63) Thin Muck Surface (Ci) _, Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1) Iron Deposits (65) — Geomorphic Position (132) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) — Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) — Microtopographic Relief (04) _ Aquatic Fauna (613) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: _ Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:6'�.-o " Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plat size: } % cove apecie$7 - Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2. F Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across Alt Strata: (B) 4, r Percent of Dominant Species (c 5 That Are QBE_. FACW, or FAC: l (Af8) 6. jotal % Cover of: Multiply by 7. x 1 = FACW species B. FAG species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = = Total Cover San linol hrub Stratum (Plot slze: } (A) (B) 1. I 2- .3.4 3- 4. 5. 6 7. - 8._ 9. 10 = Total Cover H rIuM (Plat size: 1 W ) 3. 115- f/ 94A 5. 6. 7 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. '70= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1 2 3 4 5. 6 = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Nrevaience index wortcsnest: jotal % Cover of: Multiply by OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAG species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = BIA = Hy ophytic Vegetation indicators: - - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation f 2 - Dominance Test is X50% T_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter al breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling]Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 fl (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it fall Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation - Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and piedmont -- Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point. 6 +' 2Z ,A?- Profile Description: (describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moisti_ % C0152F i °/ jy,0 _Loc" Texture Remarks 0-3 %0 � �� 7,` Tht _ RM=Reduced Matrix. M; Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Ai 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (SS) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (Inches): Remarks: Dark Surface (57) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Metrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox repressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) m, PL -Pare Lining, M=Malrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils' 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) _ Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version Ljt- ,,v t c,./3, W9 , V—, w� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: / ' ��' j' f CitylCounty: / Y�"�"�G� Sampling pater ApplicanVOwner: state: Sampling Point: � ✓ 09 T Investigator(s): Section, T ship, Range: ,oe Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 6�' ' r� Local relief (concave, convex, none)' '�"`s Siope (g6): C;> 7 Subregion (LRR or MLRrA� ): / r � e Lat: f 29-,lro % Long: ` 71y, �5'�SG7 Datum: &14 f Soil Map Unit Name: b� Ecrc �r fr trf, t? e'>A . , 6+V'"w S'c-vt" "4-* NWI classification: Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes � No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Nominal Circumstances" present? Yes � No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc, Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes _z�_ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes NoT within a Wetland? Yes No Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No / Remarks HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reguiredl Primary lndicators (minimum of dne is required& check all that apply) — Surface Soil Cracks (B5) _ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (514) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) s High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) — drainage Pa items (1310) Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (816) Water Marks (81) _ Presence of Reduced iron (C4) _ dry -Season Water Table (C2) i Sediment deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) — drift DepoSsits (83) — Thin Muck, Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mor Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) r _ Iron 940sits (85) — Geomorphic Position (02) _ InuKdation Visible on Aerial. Imagery (87) _ Shallow Aquitard (d3) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) icrotopographic Relief (d4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) J FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): No Depth (inches): lee Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 44 Wettand Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Us Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 2. yi�►P� rtt 3. 4, t✓1�iW�l yr'�LL rr''`� 5, 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 'Indicators of hydric soil and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.8 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height- Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 328 ft tall. =Total Cover Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in Woody Vine Stratum (Piot size. ) height. 1 2. 3 4. 5 - Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Present? Yes /No = Total Cover Remarks: (lnclude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and piedmont - Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size j % Cover_ Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are 0131L, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant I 2. 3. Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. - Percent of Dominant Species 5, That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AJB) 6. - _ Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total % Cover of: Nluitioly bv: 8 l7BL species x i = = Total Cover SaoiinaJShrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x 2 = 1. FAC species x 3 = 2 PACU species x 4 = 3. UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: (A) (B) 5. Prevalence Index = BJA = 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. 2 -Dominance Test is }50°l0 9. ®_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 1t}. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting = Total Cover _ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: } � /�� , _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 1. MrGt� Ali/.+ I�/Mr"�✓.� � 1 2. yi�►P� rtt 3. 4, t✓1�iW�l yr'�LL rr''`� 5, 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 'Indicators of hydric soil and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.8 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height- Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 328 ft tall. =Total Cover Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in Woody Vine Stratum (Piot size. ) height. 1 2. 3 4. 5 - Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Present? Yes /No = Total Cover Remarks: (lnclude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and piedmont - Interim Version SOIL ��a A Sampling Point_ Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix _ R90gx Features {inched Color (moist) % or [moisn % Tune Loc__ —Texture-_ 'Remarks 'Type C=Concentralion. D=Depletion, I Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Fustic Epipedon (A2) ® Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Thick Dark Surface (At 2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147,1:48) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) R Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks d Matrix, MS=M Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) in: VL=rare Lining, m=matnx. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': 2 cm. Muck (Alp) (MLRA 147) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (TlF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No r US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version WI -A1110 I^/y WC -r WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastem Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: �00cz �,f ^/,f City/County: SamplingDate: Applicant/Owner: I- !r -r,5^5 State: IVC Sampling Point: Investigator(s): ✓�� ,,' �y'I Ze—f_ Section. Township, Range: /22r'r Landform (hillsiope, terrace, etc.): t CAPE Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope 1%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): / � � / Lat: 76 112- SS_ / Long: i Z LZ / �aDatum:'' �f _ Soil Map Unit Name: n feCfe KIA--f S ltd: 110- NWI classification: Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Z No (if no, explain in Remarks ) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances` present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks ) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ---7-" 'No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? YesNo within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary indicators (minimum of one is raguirec!4 check all that pooty) _ Surface Soil Cracks (BG) _Z'S urface Water (At) — 'Prue Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) ,'High Water Table (A2) — Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (1310) t�ISaluration (A3) -__- Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (CS) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (04) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (135) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Water -Stained Leaves (89) _ Microtopographic Relief (04) 4 Aquatic Fauna (B13) QAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches) - Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (Inches): Saturation Present? Yes JL No Depth (inches): D Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes ca ills fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Pastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet; Tree Stratum (Plot size: } % Cover species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are 013L. FACW, or FAC: f (A) 2- Total Number of Dominant' 3, Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species fS7L7 qr 5• That Are Oil FACW, or FAC: (A!B) 6. _ Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 $ Total % Cover of Multiply bv: 013Lspecies x 1 = Total Cower 5aolinal5hrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: (A) (13) 5. Prevalence Index = BIA = t Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. 2 -Dominance Test is a50% 9' 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 1©. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting =Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) tr um (Piot size: J f } Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1 2, / •f C!""�O.�r�l�l d'w _�i✓/rf'i/A'C � � �"'� 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must dnc Cafjr:�( 3• be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. 2_�1 ' Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 55. xIr4 l Tc//-OL'/35- 0-6C Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or 6.- more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 7. height. S, SaplinglShrub -Woody plants, excluding wines. less g• than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 fl (1 m) tall. 10. Herb - Ali herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall. 12. = Total Cover Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) height. 1 r 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic 5- Vegetation g, Present? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: � a I 'Z7, Profile Description: {Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features _ (inches) Color (moist) %Q Color fmoist) y Typ$ Loci Texture+ Remarks 42 IdIl? 2,� RM=Reduced Matrix, M', Hydric Soil indicators: _ Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) — Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type. Depth (inches). Remarks: E Dark Surface (S7) Polyrralue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Lyamy Glayed Matrix (F2) ,- Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (!MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) In PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils): 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Malarial (TF2) Very Shallow park Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. i Hydric Soil Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version t4k1'V �/ F 141er WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site. City/County:Sampling Date: Applicant/r]wner, 0- J" State:lfl C Sampling Point: r � Investigator(s). X/111 /,X,- ' tY►'/ t Irl Section, 1�cA nshitf, Range.- Landform ange:Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):^� (Local relief (concave, convex, none): G� ri¢✓t` Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Z /I Y Lat G 120113-6 Long: _ _ - % % 4 p✓ Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: - ^,,pq:�o At/p7/1L LCA NWI classification° I Aoe_ Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes --fNo_ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes / No Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Na Is the Barreled Area � Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks. - - HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required} Primary Indicators minimum of one is reauired: check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ Surface Water (A1)_ True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B$) High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Drainage Pattems (810) _ :7saluration (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B 16) _ 'Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crash Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) Thin Muck Surface (C7) — Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mal or Crust (84) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) — Shallow Aquitafd (D3) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Microlopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (813) _ FAC -Neutral Test (05) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ` LDepth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No _.._el Depth (inches). f Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes / No includes ca ills frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: w Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator 'Dominance Test worksheet: Trpr tralpm (Plot size: ) ° Cover Species? Status- Number of Dominant Species L� 1 That Are OBI.. FACW, or FAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant {s r 3. Species Across All Strata: (B) 4- - Percent of Dominant Species f 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet; 7. 8 Total °i Cover of: Multiply by: = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = Sa lin ! hr (Piot size. } FACW species x 2 = t Ct'7? ,s,�i5�� ✓ �idC FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = 2. 3. UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: (A) (B) 5. Prevalence index a BPA = 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. - 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8 72 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 10 _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting =Total Cover — data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) m (Plot size: j 14 W, �✓✓f � j1 _ �� — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) f 2. Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 3- be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines. 3 in. (7.8 cm) or 8 more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 7, height. 8. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 9. - than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. - - of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Total Cover Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 1 in M.9dv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) height. t./,ItnI.IA- ` 2. 3. 4. 5- Hydrophytic Vegetation g. Present? Yes No r = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version 5+C)IL Sampling Point: j' -j �_' Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrixvt R Features finches) Color (moist) �9° Color (moist) % Tvae Loc' Texture _Remarks 0,/ J [ 6 L e?], , e 'Type C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM -Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL -Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) — Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A16) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Potyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Praine Redox (A16) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Glayed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) _ Stratified Layers (AS) _ Depleted Matrix (173) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A16) (LRR N) : Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) — Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _tither (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (31) (LRR N, : Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N. MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) — Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present. _ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type. Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version vt-fL,003 U91 1'/ I vi° WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site.AZI:--oce fr '`yE CityfCounty: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner-o f'j Stale: ffrC SamplingPoinl:�`��Y Investigators)'i.0�!rJ �cr� Section. Township, Range: Landform (hillslope. terrace, etc.). �+ Local relief (concave, convex. none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA) �/ f i Lat 2 / Long: _= -Or`p` Datum: h*-r`� Soil Map Unit Name: /C rte? PPVc- NWI classification: Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? 4s No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 'No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No �~ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired. check all that ilpnlyj Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) High Water Table (A2) ____ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) — Water Marks (81) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) i Sediment Deposits (62) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Drift Deposits (83) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Algal Mal or Crust (84) , Other (Explain in Remarks) i iron Deposits (B5r _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Aquatic Fauna (813) Field Observations: Surface Soil Cracks (136) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Drainage Patterns (810} Moss Trim Lines (616) — 0ry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) Geomorphic Position (132) Shallow Aquitard (D3) tcrotopographie Relief (Da) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Water Present? Yes No +�pepth (inches): C� Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches)lC� 'f Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): l6 f Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks. US Army Corps of Engineer's Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. SamplingPoinl: U%`'"r Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree tr gPlot size: ) c� % Cover Z SWIWS Number of Dominant Species 1 Thal Are OBL. FACW, or FAG: (A) 2' Total Number of Dominant o 3. Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. ta Percent of Dominant Species a 5- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: .. (Alta) 6. _ Prevalence Index worksheet; 7. 8. Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: -- - Total Cover 013L species x 1 = (Shr tratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x 2 = 1, �i Gi`f+ res e' %AC FAC species x 3 = 2, FACU species x 4 = 3. UPL species x 5 = 4_ Column Totals: (A) (B) 5. Prevalence tndex a BfA = 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. 2 - Dominance Test is X50% 9. — 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 10. _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting = Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Her r m_{Pot size: i Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain) 2. IM 1.2 L ,WAIX 4-1V1,-1 O' �fl(-7ZF 5' Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must 3 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4 ^r Deflnftlons of Four Vegetation strata: 5.- 6 �r . � ,(Jr Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or fi'i r Gtii�irf /AGi =� more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 7. 1�`r height. 8. Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less g. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 10 Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11 of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. =Total Cover Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) height. 1. 2. 3, 45. . Hydrophytic Vegetation 6 Present? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: =. � a, Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox -Features (inchesl Cantor (moist) °(_o� Color (moistl _ Ty �Loc� Texture Remarks 4L 'Type: C=Concenlration. D=De lebon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Locaation: PL=Pare Lining, M=MaInx. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) — Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) _ Histic Epipedon (A:2) : Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Hislic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) i Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) _ Stratified Layers (A5) — Depleted Matrix (173) {MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent. Material (TF2) _ Depleted Below Dario Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (FS) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N, Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soits (Fig) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (it observed): Type: Depth (inches)_ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes — Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology - _ significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If no. explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes /No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: - HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators fminimum of one i5 require _Z Surface Water (Al) High Water Table (A2) turalion (A3) Water Marks (81) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Drift Deposits (83) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Iron Deposits (135) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes / No Water Table Present? Yes= No Saturation Present? Yes -'-No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, Remarks: heck all that apply) True Aquatic Plants (1314) — Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Cather (Explain in Remarks) Surface Soil Cracks (86) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) — Drainage Pattems (1314) _ Mass Trim Lines (B16) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (133) �Icrotopographic Relief (D4) ! FAC -Neutral Test (DS) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Cs Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ng well, aerial photos, previous lnspecUons). if available US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version 1 w cv WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Sile:I/ect!;'r City/County:'¢% Sampling fate: G ApplicanVOwner - > r m_ �f e*1 / State: "/C Sampling Point.- oint:Invesligator(s). Investigator(s).Al 7 tom •; Section, wns "` . Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) Low Local relief (concave, convex, none). g ee�oyl� slope (%y E� Subregion (LRR or MLRA): r 1 Lat: °2 5-Yy Long: 77 5-2'/V/3 Datum: r Soil Map Unit Name: ot LAS IV ' �° Ll�+!-' NWI classification � r Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes — Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology - _ significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If no. explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes /No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: - HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators fminimum of one i5 require _Z Surface Water (Al) High Water Table (A2) turalion (A3) Water Marks (81) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Drift Deposits (83) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Iron Deposits (135) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes / No Water Table Present? Yes= No Saturation Present? Yes -'-No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, Remarks: heck all that apply) True Aquatic Plants (1314) — Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Cather (Explain in Remarks) Surface Soil Cracks (86) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) — Drainage Pattems (1314) _ Mass Trim Lines (B16) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (133) �Icrotopographic Relief (D4) ! FAC -Neutral Test (DS) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Cs Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ng well, aerial photos, previous lnspecUons). if available US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Paint: ' f -- Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stralum (Plot size } ° Cover Specie tatusNumber of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata. (B) Percent of Dominant Species 4. That Are DBL, FACW. or FAC_ (AIB) 5. Talal Yg Cover of; Mullioly by: 6. - FACW species x 2 7. FAC species x 3 = FACLI species 8 - UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Total Cover SaolincJShrUb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. "' %`tai/ -F.'S /rte /L) % +moi✓ 2. 3. � r3ry /G"s4'za,,,� 'Y'J/l�Pc'trLt vA r � rt fDC 4. 5. 6. 7. 8- 9. 10. Total Cover Herb Straturn ITt size: ) 2. 3. % A( 07,L 4. 5. 6. 7. 8, 9. 10. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet ) Prevalence Index = BIA = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Deflnitlons of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. SaplingfShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height Hydrophyrtfc Vegetation present? Yes 3. No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mounlains and Piedmont - Interim Version Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata. (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are DBL, FACW. or FAC_ (AIB) Prevalence Index worksheet: Talal Yg Cover of; Mullioly by: DBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 FAC species x 3 = FACLI species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = BIA = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Deflnitlons of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. SaplingfShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height Hydrophyrtfc Vegetation present? Yes 3. No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mounlains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: s Lffdl Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix R d x Fealures i nchesi Color (moiski °!o Calor (moist) % Tvoe ' g� _ Texture Remarks ced Matrix. MS= z Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators For Problematic Hydric Soils': Hlslosol (A1) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) , Polyvatue Below Surface (SS) (MLRA 147, 146) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Q Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (59) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) _ _ Stratified Layers (A5) :2�Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dario Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) — Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ! Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) — Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplarn Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present. _ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: - Depth (inches). Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks V US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version I/ 0-14,19S WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM s Eastern Mountains and 'piedmont Project/Site: 1v e `'" `��< City/County: /+��Sampling Date: � l Applicant/Owner. � O,v `'7 f State: Sampling Point yt.t Investigator(s): 4Y/0" • 0O."s Section. Township. Range: ��✓ Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): car ��f ��1p a/�r Local relief (concave, convex, none)q✓r��1� /s�✓*L Slope (%) +�' y Subregion (L RR or MLR,+A): ir / _ Lat: '3 1, /2. S � Long. /• 2( 9 I r Datum' 'vis Soil Map Unit Name: ?/VA' C3 -(14q ra , tic., / (i' '2 NWI classification 1 IA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �No (If no. explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation �Soll, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Welland Hydrology Present? Remarks: Y(4, HYDROLOGY Yeses No Yes� No Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Welland? Yes No foto �T ; C01..f Primary lndicators (minimum of one is recuired: crheg_k qI that apply) Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (B14) High Water Table (A2) v Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) Saturation (A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living floats (C3) Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent, Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (85) Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (137) — Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (813) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No " Depth (Inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Surface Soil Cracks (86) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Drainage Patterns (810) _ Moss trim Lines (B16) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) a Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wettand Hydrology Present? Yes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available Remarks. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size. ) Yg Qoyer Species? Slalvs Number of Dominant Species 1, That Are QBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 Tplal %Cover of. Multiply bv: 3. x 1 = FACW species 4. FAG species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species 6. Column Totals: (A) (B) 7 Total Cover Saphnal$hrub,51ratum (Plot size: } 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 16. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size. } 2. ' �^eAL ✓ 3. t 0 64.07E t 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 9. 10. 11. 12. _ = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Total Cover Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are QBL, FACW, or FAC 1-2 (A) (B) '50" /199 (AIB) Prevalence index worksheet: Tplal %Cover of. Multiply bv: ©BL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAG species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = BIA = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 • Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations` (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 328 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3,28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.29 ft in height. Hydrophytic / Vegetation t Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: f1G0�r.,T Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix _ _ Redox Features (}nchesl Calor (moist) CQIQr (mLoc' Texitirg _ Remarks �7 fit^ r fey f� C� 69 Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) T Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick. Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N. MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Sinpped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type Depth (inches) Remarks: Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Thin Dark Surlace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) —,�-Oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (173) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) >n: PL -Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils' 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and wetland 'hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version lir O tv// WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastem Mountains and Piedmont Gvi2r k.//5 vP Project/Site: /V ' 'Cac-f CitylCouniy: _ /4 /fes .t Sampling DaW t!` 2 5-,, Applicant/Owner. � i�7F 1Y. ''f State: ,`/C- Sampling Point: Ir Investigator($) Section, Township. Range: is a -,r rv, Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none), #` Slope {96} p ! Subregion (LRR or MLRA). /?- I Lat: 3� X 12'34 Long -a:C2,15_2Y Datum: Sail Map Unit Name: I A � ^`f° �' t `'�xE` ✓ - ;? QAf'W P NWI classification: Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes -'�' No (If no, explain in Remarks ) Are Vegetation Sail or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are `Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Welland? Yes [alb Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks - - HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of Iwo required) Prima;M Indicators fmioimum of one is reouirgd pheck all that a2plyl _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B83 High Water Table (A2) — Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) — Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) — Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (816) Water Marks (81) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) , Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (134) Other (Explain in Remarks) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) _ Iron Deposits (135) — Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) — Shallow Aquitard (03) Water -Stained Leaves (89) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No —/-"'Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes Not]epth (inches}: Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers 'Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of Tants. Sampling Paint: Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet ) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size ° Cover Sperm Status Number of Dominant Species t That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) 3. 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC: (A1B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 Total ° ver f: Multiply bv: a. OBL species x 1= = Total cover SaolinglShrub Stratum ('Plot size y FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x3= 2 FACU species x4= 3. UPL species x 5 Column Totals: (A) (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index = B1A = Flydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydraphytic Vegetation —_ B. 2 -Dominance Test is X50% 9, _ 3 • Prevalence Index is 53.0' 10 _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size. } FAA -1* —Problematic hlydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) Cay t., of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must . 3 �� f�� ,�,��,'Indicators - be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 6. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of q height. 8. Saplfngl5hrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less g. than 3 in. ❑BH and greater than 3.28 11 (1 m) tall, 10. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall 12. 7O 'W vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in =Total Cover height Woody Vine stratum (Plot size: 1 1. 2. 3. 4. i Hydrophytic 5 Vegetation 6 Present? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet ) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version SOIL Sampling Point. Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) Colgr (moist) % I r i % Iya Loc` Texture Remarks ,'Type: C_=Concentra lion, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (A1) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Poly -value Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) — Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172) _ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) ___. Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Mucic (A10) (LRR N) — Redox Dark Surface (F6) _,___ Red Parent Material (TF2) m Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) , Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ` Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Fran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _! Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes NoL Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version j WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Projectisite City/County: Sampling Date: V- 2 ! Applicant/Owner, State-4� Sampling Point: � i r Investigator(s): I L/ r�11 � 4C -" f Section. Township. Range: �"r, _jam -r-" � Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): '"fEE` F Local relief (concave, convex, none): .£ Slope M: i��v� Subregion (LRR or MLRA) / Lat. Long: Datum. ��+ iS Soil Map Unit Name: Lt e r,,4 C'.0 G041., E,6,y, (e*,9E NWI classification. ff f/f Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no. explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes /""' No Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired) r'r'mary Indicators (minimum of ane is reouirgd check all that apply) — Surface Soil Cracks (136) ,Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (B14) ! Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) /High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) ;;"©xidized Rhizaspheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (Bi) _ Presence of Reduced iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (63) Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ tither (Explain in Remarks) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (B5) ^ Geomorphic Position (132) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) a Shallow Aquilard (03) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) _Y icrotopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) - / FAC -Neutral Test (D'5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes X" No Depth (inches); Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches). Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Ilse scientific names of plants. Sampling Point "e—, Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree y tratum (Plot size: r ci ? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2- Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: (B) d. Percent of Dominant Species it 4110 5. That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: (AIB) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 8. Total % Cover of. lutulliply bv: = Total 'Cover OBL species x 1 = Saolin Shrub Stratum (Piot size, ) FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3. UPL species x5= 4 Column Totals: (A) (B) 5. Prevalence Index = BIA = S. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 - 8. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophoc Vegetation 2 -Dominance Tes! Is 350% 9 _ 3 - Prevalence index is s3.0' 10. _ _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size. ) �- �p IfQCw Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1 t✓r 3✓1 k;PWrI, indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 3. lL'S be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. ! gf. , i D AC dS L Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Tree - Woody plants. excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 6 more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 7. height. 8. SaplinglShru6 -Woody plants, excluding vines, less 9. than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (i m) tall. 10. - HerB - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vine - All woody wines greater than 3.28 it in T = Total Cover height. Woody dine Stratum (Piot size: ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 5• Vegetation 6 Present? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Paint: Wverl Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) - Color (moislL % Colar (moist) % Type _ Textv,re Remarks b �1 /0/A Z_ Lo -Int I sy r 1 7 Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) — Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (At 2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _ stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type. Depth (inches). Remarks Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) laamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 135, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) m: PLzPore Lining, M=Malnx. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19) (MLRA 135, 147) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ® Other (Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrop hylic vegetal ion and welland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Hydric Soil Presen17 Yes f No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -- Intenm Version Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Appendices Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Appendix E Categorical Exclusion Document Appendix A Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement Program Projects Version 1.4 Mote: only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the environmental document. Part 1: General Project Information Project Name: Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Count Name: Alamance Count EEP Number: Project Sponsor: Restoration Systems, LLC Project Contact Name: Worth Creech Project Contact Address: 1101 Ha nes Street, Suite 211 Raleigh, NC 27604 Project Contact E-mail: Worth@restorationsystems.com EEP Project Manager: Project Description The Aycock Springs Site encompasses 15 acres of land used for livestock grazing, tray production, and timber harvest. Existing Site streams have been cleared, dredged of cobble substrate, trampled. by livestock, eroded vertically and laterally. The project will restore streams and wetlands within the Site for total of 3610 Stream Mitigation Units (SMRs) and 1.4 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs)- For Official Only Reviewed By: Date EEP Project Manager Conditional Approved By: Date For Division Administrator FHWA [; Check this box if there are outstanding issues Final Approval By: Date For Division Administrator F HWA 6 Version 1.4, 8118145 Part 2: All Projects Regulation/Question Coastal Zone Management Act CZMA 1. Is the project Located in a CAMA county? ❑ Yes No 2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of ❑ Yes Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ No RQ NIA 3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? ❑ Yes ❑i No PC NIA 4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management ❑ Yes Program? ❑ No NIA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com ensation and Liabilit Act CERCLA 1. is this a "full-delivery" project? Yes No 2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been Yes designated as commercial or industrial? EI No ❑ NIA 3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential ❑ Yes hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? No NIA 4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ❑ Yes waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ❑ No NIA. 5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ❑ Yes waste sites within the project area? ❑ No NIA 6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation pian? ❑ Yes ❑ No CK NIA National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of ❑ Yes Historic Places in the project area? tA No 2 Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPOITHPO concur? Yes No ❑ NIA 3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? ❑ Yes ❑ No NIA Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act Uniform Act 1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? XYes ❑ No 2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? WYes ❑ No ❑ NIA 3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? ❑ Yes ?f No ❑ NIA 4. Has the owner of the property been informed' Yes * prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and N No * what the fair market value is believed to be? ❑ NIA Version 1.4, 8/18/05 Part 3: Ground -Disturbing Activities Regulation/Question Response American Indian Reliciious Freedom Act AIRFA 1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of ❑ Yes Cherokee Indians? tK No 2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National' Register of Historic ❑ Yes Places? ❑ No ON/ 4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? ❑ Yes ❑ No NIA Antiquities Act AA 1. Is the project located on Federal lands? ❑ Yes No 2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects ❑ Yes of antiquity? ❑ No [' NIA 3. Will a permit from the appropriate 'Federal agency be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No 7[ N/A 4. Has a permit been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No NIA Archaeological Resources Protection Act ARPA 1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? ❑ Yes N No 2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? ❑ Yes ❑ No X NIA 3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No NIA _ 4. Has a permit been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No K NIA Endangered Species Act ESA 1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or designated Critical Habitat ❑ Yes listed for the county? ®No 2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical ❑ Yes Habitat? ❑ No N/A 4. Is the project "likely to adversely affect' the species and/or "likely to adversely modify" ❑ Yes Designated Critical Habitat? ❑ No N/A 5 Does the USFWSINOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 6. Has the USFWSINOAA-Ftshenes rendered a jeopardy" determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No NIA Version 1.4, 8118/08 Executive Order 13007 Indian Sacred Sites 1, Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory" ❑ Yes by the EBCI? 5�r No 2. Has the EBCi indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed ❑ Yes project? ❑ No NCA 3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred ❑ Yes sites?o KNCA _ Farmland Protection Policy Act FPPA 1. 'VVill real estate be acquired? Yes ❑ No 2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally Yes important farmland? ri No ❑ N/A 3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? Yes LJ No ❑ N/A Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act FWCA 1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any Yes NNo water body? 2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? ] Yes [� No ❑ NIA Land and Water Conservation Fund Act JSection 6 1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public, ❑ Yes outdoor recreation? No 2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? Yves ❑ No NCA Magnuson-Stevens FisherV Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat 1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? ❑ Yes No 2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the ❑ Yes project on EFH? ❑ No NIA 4. VWill the project adversely affect EFH? ❑ Yes ❑ No NCA 5. Has consultation with NCAA-Fisheries occurred? Yes No [KNCA Migratory Bird Treat Act MBTA 1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? Yes kNo 2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? ❑ Yes No NCA Wilderness Act 1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? ❑ Yes No 2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining ❑ Yes federai agency? ❑ Nu NCA Version 1 A, 8/18/05 North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office Ramona M. Bartos, administrator Governor Pat McCrory :secretary Susan Kluttz March 20, 2014 Grant Lewis Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 Re: Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland %litigation, Alarnance County, ER 14-0442 Dear Mr. Lewis: Thank you for your letter of March 7, 2014, concerning the above project. Offiec of Archives and History Deputy Sccrctary Kvvin Cherry We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed. The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or renee.eedhill- earley(2a ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number. Sincerely, 6r'Ramona M. Banos Location: 109 lost Jones Street, Raleigh NC 2-1,601 Mailing Address: 4(117 M"Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 Telephone/Fax: {1]19) 847-6574/807-6599 United States Department of the Interior Grant Lewis Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh ES Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 April 4.2014 Re: Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project - Alamance County, NC Dear Mr. Lewis: This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally -protected endangered and threatened species with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally -protected species. Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern[ that are known to occur in each county in North Carolina. Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized, funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally-]isted endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be prepared to fulfill that rcquirement and in deten-ni .ing whether additional. consultation with the S rvice is necessary. In addition to the federal ly-protectedlspecies list, information on the species' life histories and habitats and information on corn leting a biological assessment or evaluation and can be found can our web pag at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the web site often for updated information or ch4nges. I The term "federal species of concern" refers to thos species wh4h the Service believes might be in need of concentrated conservation actions. Federal pecies of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does not necessarily imply that the species will e eenwally be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened species. However, we recommend that all f racticable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to federal species of concern. If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys. If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects, before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles. With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our continents are submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act. Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action. However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species, including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by the North Carolina Division of Land resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction. Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site. The North Carolina Wildlife resources Commission has developer) a Guidance Memorandum (a copy can be found on our website at (http:llwww.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality. We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary). 2 We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need., for general correspondence for species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Kathy Matthews of this office at (919) 856-4520 ext. 27. Sincerely, f,l r y' Pete Benjamin Field Supervisor 3 List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility Alamance Beaufort Bertie Bladen Brunswick Camden Carteret Caswell Chatham Chowan Columbus Craven Cumberland Currituck Dare Duplin Durham Edgecombe Franklin Gates Granville Greene Guilford Halifax Harnett Hertford Hoke Hyde Johnston Jones Lee Lenoir Martin Montgomery Moore Nash New Hanover Northampton Onslow Grange Pamlico Pasquotank Pender 4 Perquimans Person Pitt Randolph Richmond Robeson Rockingham Sampson. Scotland Tyrrell Vance Wake Warren Washington Wayne Wilson U.S. Department of Agriculture FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING PART I (To be compfetedby Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request 03/07/2014 Name of Project Aycock Springs Sites Federal Agency Involved FHWA Proposed Land Use Stream Restoration Site County and State Alamance County and North Carolina PART I! (To be completed by NRCS) NDate RCS eUUl10,014 y P I NC Does the site contain Prime, Unique, Statewide or Local Important Farmland? fff no, the FPPA does not apply - do not complete additional parts of this form) YES NO 21 ❑ Acres Irrigated mane Size 117 Major Crop(sj Corn Farmabie Land In Govt. Jurisdiction Acres: 179,30' acres 64.4% Amount of Farmland As Defined in FPPA Acres: 240,62 acres 86.4% Name of Land Evaluation System Used Alamance Co. Lesa Name of State or Local Site Assessment System NIA Date Land 'Evaluation Returned by NRCS 04/09/2014 PART III (To be completed by Federal Agency) Alternative Site Rating Site A I Site B Site C Site D A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 1 1 B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly C. Total Acres In Site 15 PART IV (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Information A. Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland 1 B_ Total Acres Statewide Important or Local Important Farmland 1 C. Percentage Of Farmland in County Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted 0.0008 L}, Percentage Of Farmland in Govt. Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value 81 PART V (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Criterion Relative Value of Farmland To Be Converted Scale of 0 to 100 Points 44 PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Site Assessment Criteria Maximum Criteria are ex lained in 7 CFR 658.5b. For Corridorprojectuse form NRCS-CPA-106Points Site A Site B site C Site D 1. Area In Non-urban Use (15) 2. Perimeter to Non-urban Use (10) HI 0 3. Peroent Of Site Being Farmed (20) y 4. Protection Provided By State and Local Government (20) (! 5. Distance From Urban Built-up Area (15) 6. Distance To Urban Support Services (15) T Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average (10) /p 8. Creation Of Non-farmable Farmland (10) D 9. Availability Of Farm Support Services (5) 10. On-Farm Investments (20) to 11. Effects Of Conversion On f=arm Support Services (1o) b 12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use (10) Q TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 1 0 0 0 0 PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency) Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100 44 0 0 0 Total Site Assessment (From Part V) above or local site assessment) 160 Q 0 0 TOTAL POINTS (Total of above 2 lines) 1 260 44 a o 0 -- -- Site Selected: Date Of Selection Was A Local Site Assessment Used? YES❑ NO❑ Reason For Selection: Name of Federal agency representative completing this form: F14WR'o vi r o1; e: f/ (See Instructions on reverse side) ` Form A15-1006 (03-02) North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9 Gordan Myers, Executive Director I l March 2014 Mr. Grant Lewis, Senior Project Manager Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Subject: Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site, Alamance County Dear Mr. Lewis: Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject information. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et sett.). The proposed project would restore stream channels through active pasture land, and provide in- kind mitigation for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts. Several sections of channel have been identified as significantly degraded. The project site includes Travis Creek and an unnamed tributary to Travis Creek in the Cape Fear River basin. Stream restoration projects often improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Establishing native, forested buffers in riparian areas will help protect water quality, improve aquatic and terrestrial habitats, and provide a travel corridor for wildlife species. Provided measures are taken to minimize erosion and sedimentation from construction/restoration activities, we do not anticipate the project to result in significant adverse impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposed project. If we can provide further assistance, please contact our office at (336) 449-7625 or shari.bi -as}tta.ncwildlife. ;. Sincerely, ,A -A Shari L. Bryant Piedmont Region Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 Telephoner (919) 707-0220 w Fax: (919) 707-0028 FORM-LBF-CCA tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Amick Road Elon, NC 27244 Inquiry Number: 3873620.6s March 06, 2014 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 9 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM GeoCheck - Not Requested TC3873620.6s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3873620.6s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS AMICK ROAD ELON, NC 27244 COORDINATES 36.1273000 - 36˚ 7’ 38.28’’Latitude (North): 79.5249000 - 79˚ 31’ 29.64’’Longitude (West): Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator: 632740.9UTM X (Meters): 3998874.8UTM Y (Meters): 626 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 36079-B5 OSSIPEE, NCTarget Property Map: 1970Most Recent Revision: 36079-A5 GIBSONVILLE, NCSouth Map: 1994Most Recent Revision: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 2012Photo Year: USDASource: TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPLNational Priority List EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3873620.6s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPLNational Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list CERCLISComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System FEDERAL FACILITYFederal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAPCERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTSCorrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDFRCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQGRCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLSEngineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROLSites with Institutional Controls LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Federal ERNS list ERNSEmergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL NC HSDSHazardous Substance Disposal Site State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWSInactive Hazardous Sites Inventory State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LFList of Solid Waste Facilities State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUSTRegional UST Database EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3873620.6s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists USTPetroleum Underground Storage Tank Database AST AST Database INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries INST CONTROLNo Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCPResponsible Party Voluntary Action Sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDSBrownfields Projects Inventory ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDSA Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODIOpen Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations SWRCY Recycling Center Listing HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDLClandestine Drug Labs US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRSHazardous Materials Information Reporting System IMD Incident Management Database SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLRRCRA - Non Generators EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3873620.6s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data DOD Department of Defense Sites FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD Records Of Decision UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites US MINES Mines Master Index File TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System PADS PCB Activity Database System MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO Radiation Information Database FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RMP Risk Management Plans UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations SCRD DRYCLEANERSState Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites 2020 COR ACTION2020 Corrective Action Program List LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMERPCB Transformer Registration Database US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem PRP Potentially Responsible Parties Financial AssuranceFinancial Assurance Information Listing EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGPEDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR US Hist Auto StatEDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR US Hist CleanersEDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWSRecovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3873620.6s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists OLI: Old Landfill Inventory Database. A review of the OLI list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/05/2013 has revealed that there is 1 OLI site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ ELON COLLEGE LDFL - AMICK RD FROM I-40 W., TAKE EXITE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.)18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3873620.6s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 18 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ GENTRY PROPERTY, KENNETH LAST ALTAMAHAW MALL LUST, RGA LUST MATKINS MEAT PROCESSORS IMD, LUST, UST, RGA LUST FOSCOE’S SERVICE STATION IMD, LUST, RGA LUST PANTRY #161-B LUST TRUST TOWN OF ELON UST S & S PATTERN SHOP UST SHOMAKER PLANT UST TRAVIS CREEK PUMP STATION UST C & H MARKET UST HOME ENTERTAINMENT&DECOR SYS UST ROGER BEAUCHESNE GEN. CONT. UST W.L. SMITH 66 SERVICE UST FRYAR AMBULANCE SERVICE UST HWY 87 CONVENIENCE STORE UST SERV-U-SERVICENTER UST GIBSONVILLE UST BACK CREEK PUMP STATION UST EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 0 0 0 0 6 8 0 6407 2 0 680 6 40 6 8 0 72 0 6 8 0 6 8 0 6 8 0 7 2 0 720 7 20 600 680 680 6 4 06 8 0 680 40 68 0 6 8 0 680 640 640 68 0 6 0 0 60 0 680 6 80680 640 6 80 6 8 0 68 0 680 6 8 0 640 6 4 0 680 6 40640 6 4 0 6 00 6 8 0 6 006806 8 0 680 6 40 6 80 640 6 4 0 6 4 0 640 6 40 6 40 6 4 0 6 4 0 6 4 0 6 40 0 6 4 0 6 8 0 6 8 0 6 8 0 680 6 64 0 6 40640640 640 6 4 0 640 6 4 0 640 6 4 0 640 6 40 6 4 0 6 4 0 6 8 0 680 600 6 4 0 640 640640 680 6 8 0680 6 8 0 640 640 6 4 0 6 80 6 4 0 6 4 0 6 80 6806 80 6 806 8 0 68 0 6 8 0 6 80 6 80 680 680680 6807 2 0 6 8 0 6 8 0 6 80 6 8 0 6 8 0 6 8 0 6 8 0 6 80 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 640 64 0 640 640 640 640 640 64 0 640640640 6 4 0 640 640 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CERCLIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CERC-NFRAP Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500OLI State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TC3873620.6s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IMD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 80 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR TC3873620.6s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250EDR US Hist Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST TC3873620.6s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC3873620.6s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedUnable to Locate: Not reportedOther Agency Lead: 263753State Plane Y: 563004State Plane X: NONCD0000730Facility ID: NC OLI: 2165 ft. 0.410 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 623 ft. 1/4-1/2ELON COLLEGE, NC EastFROM I-40 W., TAKE EXIT 141 AND TURN RIGHT ON HUFFMAN MILL R N/A 1 OLIELON COLLEGE LDFL - AMICK RD S106338944 TC3873620.6s Page 8 OR P H A N S U M M A R Y Ci t y ED R I D Si t e N a m e Si t e A d d r e s s ZipDatabase(s) Co u n t : 1 8 r e c o r d s . EL O N S1 0 9 6 8 4 8 5 6 PA N T R Y # 1 6 1 - B 10 3 1 H I G H W A Y 7 N O R T H LUST TRUST EL O N U0 0 1 2 0 6 7 7 2 TO W N O F E L O N HW Y 7 0 W E S T S E W E R P U M P I N G S T A T 27244UST EL O N C O L L E G E U0 0 1 2 0 0 7 2 5 S & S P A T T E R N S H O P RO U T E 1 , H I G H W A Y 8 7 , O S S I P E E R 27244UST EL O N C O L L E G E U0 0 1 2 0 0 9 1 5 SH O M A K E R P L A N T HI G H W A Y 1 0 0 R T 3 27244UST EL O N C O L L E G E U0 0 1 2 0 0 6 1 1 TR A V I S C R E E K P U M P S T A T I O N S. R . 1 5 4 9 A T S . R . 1 5 0 4 27244UST EL O N C O L L E G E U0 0 3 1 4 2 4 1 6 C & H M A R K E T RT 2 27244UST EL O N C O L L E G E S1 0 5 7 6 6 5 8 1 AL T A M A H A W M A L L RO U T E 2 , B O X 1 0 4 B 27244LUST, RGA LUST EL O N C O L L E G E U0 0 0 8 2 8 9 4 8 HO M E E N T E R T A I N M E N T & D E C O R S Y S RT E 3 B O X 1 1 5 A - H W Y 1 0 0 27244UST EL O N C O L L E G E U0 0 1 1 8 8 5 0 5 RO G E R B E A U C H E S N E G E N . C O N T . PI T T S R O A D - R O U T E 1 27244UST GIB S O N V I L L E U00 1 1 9 4 6 6 8 W.L . S M I T H 6 6 S E R V I C E RT # 1 27249UST GIB S O N V I L L E U00 1 1 9 2 0 6 4 FRY A R A M B U L A N C E S E R V I C E ROU T E 1 27249UST GIB S O N V I L L E U00 1 1 8 8 7 4 1 MAT K I N S M E A T P R O C E S S O R S RT. 1 27249IMD, LUST, UST, RGA LUST GIB S O N V I L L E U00 0 8 2 9 1 6 9 HWY 8 7 C O N V E N I E N C E S T O R E RT. 1 B O X 3 5 9 A A 27249UST GIB S O N V I L L E U00 1 1 9 7 5 8 0 SER V - U - S E R V I C E N T E R HIG H W A Y 1 0 0 W E S T 27249UST GIB S O N V I L L E U00 1 1 9 2 5 4 6 GIB S O N V I L L E HIG H W A Y 6 1 N O R T H 27249UST GIB S O N V I L L E U00 1 1 9 2 0 3 4 BAC K C R E E K P U M P S T A T I O N SPR I N G W O O D A V E . E X T . ( S R 2 7 4 8 ) 27249UST GIB S O N V L L E S11 0 6 2 9 6 8 1 GEN T R Y P R O P E R T Y , K E N N E T H 617 6 N C H W Y 8 7 N . 27249LAST OSS I P E E S10 4 4 8 2 9 4 7 FOS C O E ’ S S E R V I C E S T A T I O N NC H W Y 8 7 N O R T H 27244IMD, LUST, RGA LUST TC 3 8 7 3 6 2 0 . 6 s P a g e 9 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the NationalPriorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register.EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments,and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet therequirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3873620.6s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 151 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC3873620.6s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3873620.6s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 12/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 12/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 11/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 95 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/02/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority List as well as those on the state priority list. Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Telephone: 919-754-6580 Last EDR Contact: 02/05/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/19/2014 Data Release Frequency: Biennially State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS TC3873620.6s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-508-8400 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/31/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-0692 Last EDR Contact: 12/31/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually OLI: Old Landfill Inventory Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead sites). Date of Government Version: 04/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2013 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-4996 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Regional UST Database This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-1308 Last EDR Contact: 02/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses incurred while remediating Leaking USTs. Date of Government Version: 10/11/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-1315 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC3873620.6s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 877-623-6748 Last EDR Contact: 02/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 08/27/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/27/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 03/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 08/27/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 09/12/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3873620.6s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 11/21/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 184 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-1308 Last EDR Contact: 02/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AST: AST Database Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons. Date of Government Version: 12/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-715-6183 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 07/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 05/10/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2011 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC3873620.6s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/13/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 11/21/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 271 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 07/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/30/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 129 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3873620.6s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-508-8400 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-508-8400 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for cleanup and liabitliy control. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/07/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-4996 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3873620.6s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 09/24/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 02/25/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing A listing of solid waste facilities. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-0692 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2009 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing A listing of recycling center locations. Date of Government Version: 11/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-707-8137 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3873620.6s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 12/04/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/16/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009 Number of Days to Update: 131 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC3873620.6s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING IMD: Incident Management Database Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents Date of Government Version: 07/21/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2006 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-3221 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80. Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/19/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. TC3873620.6s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 02/25/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 03/05/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/16/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. TC3873620.6s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC3873620.6s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 07/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 91 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3873620.6s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 03/08/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 111 Source: EPA Telephone: (404) 562-9900 Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Biennially UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing A listing of uncerground injection wells locations. Date of Government Version: 11/13/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-807-6412 Last EDR Contact: 02/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3873620.6s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has knowledge of and entered into this database. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-508-8400 Last EDR Contact: 12/24/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/05/2013 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-7015 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/19/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 11/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/02/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3873620.6s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 04/15/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-508-8496 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-5962 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: N/A Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information Hazardous waste financial assurance information. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2012 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-707-8222 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-5962 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC3873620.6s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-1322 Last EDR Contact: 02/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 01/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 11/11/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage, transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-807-6359 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3873620.6s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 02/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 08/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/13/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3873620.6s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners - Cole Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations - Cole Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Number of Days to Update: 172 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina. TC3873620.6s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/02/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2012 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2013 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/19/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/05/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC3873620.6s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines:This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Rextag Strategies Corp. Telephone: (281) 769-2247 U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data Sensitive Receptors:There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List Source: Department of Health & Human Services Telephone: 919-662-4499 Flood Zone Data:This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI:National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-2090 TC3873620.6s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC3873620.6s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Appendices Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Appendix F NCEEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist/HEC RAS Output Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 919-215-1693 October 29, 2014 John Gerber, PE, CFM State NFIP Coordinator NC Floodplain Management Branch 4218 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-4218 Re: Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland mitigation project Alamance County 14-006 FEMA Floodplain Requirements Checklist Dear Mr. Gerber: The purpose of this letter is to request concurrence from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) concerning a stream and wetland restoration site located in Alamance County. The Site encompasses approximately 15 acres of agricultural land used for livestock grazing and hay production. Existing Site streams have been cleared, dredged of cobble substrate, trampled by livestock, eroded vertically and laterally, and receive extensive sediment and nutrient inputs from livestock. Proposed activities at the Site include the restoration of perennial and intermittent stream channels, enhancement of perennial stream channel, and restoration of riparian wetlands. Work proposed on the main channel of Travis Creek includes easing two tight meanders, removing a breached dam that impinges flow at the site outfall, moving the channel to a relict and abandoned reach of channel, and planting with forest vegetation on cleared sections. Stream reaches are depicted on the attached figures and lengths/priority are as follows: Reach Length Priority UT 1 1315 Priority 1 Restoration UT 2 675 Priority 1 Restoration UT 3 212 Priority 1 Restoration UT 4 413 Priority 1 Restoration Travis Creek 1351 Enhancement Level II Travis Creek 744 Priority 1 and 2 Restoration FEMA mapping was reviewed to determine if the project is located in a FEMA study area (DFIRM panel number 8846). Based on existing floodplain mapping, the site is located in Special Flood Hazard Area and the project may require a “Conditional Letter of Map Revision” (CLOMR), and a subsequent “Letter of Map Revision” (LOMR). We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact the below referenced EEP Project Manager with any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project. Yours truly, AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL , INC. W. Grant Lewis Senior Project Manager Attachments Figure 1 Project Location Figure 2 Topography EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist Cc Raymond Holz Kristie Corson Church Street 8 7 H i g h w a y Burlingto n R o a d Carmon Road El o n - O s s i p p e R o a d Webb A v e n u e Bethe l C h u r c h R o a d Cu l l e n R o a d Du r h a m S t r e e t Howerton Road Amick Road NC - 1 0 0 H i g h w a y N C - 6 1 H i g h w a y Fried e n C h u r c h R o a d Cotton R o a d Bell Road M a n n i n g S t r e e t Mc I n t y r e R o a d Wago n e r R o a d Gerringer Mill Road Lowe R o a d E n d w e l l R o a d Pitt Road Co u n t y F a r m R o a d Barber Road Kivette House Road Eagles f i e l d R o a d Keans b u r g R o a d Whitsett Park Roa d Power Line Road Fr a n k R o a d Phibbs Road Fernway Road Dow Drive N C - 6 1 H i g h w a y Alamance County, NC Title: Prepared for: Notes: Background Imagery sources(provided by ESRI Data andMaps):1. Physical Map of the UnitedStates (2009) created by theU.S. Park Service (upper inset).2. Delorme World Basemapdigital mapping (2010, lowerinset).3. Burlington, NC (1980),Lake Burlington, NC (1969),Gibsonville, NC (1970), andOssipee, NC (1970) 7.5-minute topographicquadrangles provided by theU.S. Geological Survey. ProjectLocation Aycock SpringsStream andWetlandRestorationSite Project: FIGURE Drawn by: Date: Scale: Project No.: SGD Oct 2013 As Shown 13-004.02 §¨¦40101230.5 Miles Legend Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site County lines 1 AL A M A N C E C O U N T Y Gi b s o n v i l l e - O s s i p e e R o a d !. £¤70 ¬«100 k k µ ¬«87 ¬«54 ¬«87 ¬« 87 Directions to the Site from Interstates 40/85 in Burlington/Elon, NC:- Exit onto University Drive (I-40/85 Exit 140) and travel north (toward Elon)- Travel north for 2.8 miles and merge with NC 100- Continue on University Drive (NC 100) for 0.5 mile and turn left onto Manning Street (SR 1503)- Travel northwest for 0.8 mile and turn right onto Gibsonville-Ossipee Road (SR 1500)- Travel north for 0.7 mile and Site is on the right Aycock SpringsStream and Wetland Restoration Site 36.127271 N-79.525214 W GIBSONVILLE WHITSETT ELON BURLINGTON GU I L F O R D C O U N T Y §¨¦85 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Alamance County, NC Title: Prepared for: Notes: Background Imagery sources(provided by ESRI Data andMaps):1. Burlington, NC (1980),Lake Burlington, NC (1969),Gibsonville, NC (1970), andOssipee, NC (1970) 7.5-minute topographicquadrangles provided by theU.S. Geological Survey. Topography Aycock SpringsStream andWetlandRestorationSite Project: FIGURE Drawn by: Date: Scale: Project No.: WGL OCT 2013 As Shown 13-004.02 2Legend Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Ü 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.1 Miles Ossipee USGS Quadrangle o�y_ stem EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist This form was developed by the National Flood Insurance program, NC Floodplain Mapping program and Ecosystem Enhancement Program to be filled for all EEP projects. The form is intended to summarize the floodplain requirements during, the design phase of the projects. The form should be submitted to the Local Floodplain Administrator with three copies submitted to NFIP (attn. State NFIP Engineer), NC Floodplain Mapping Unit (attn. State NFIP Coordinator) and NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Project Location Name of project: Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Name if stream or feature: Travis Creek County: Alamance Name of river Basin: Cape Fear Is project urban or rural? Rural Dame of Jurisdictional municipality/county: Alamance DFIRM panel number for entire site: 5846 Consultant name: Axiom Environmental, Inc. Phone number: 919-215-1693 Address: 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 FEMA_F1©odplain_Checklist4-23-12.docx Page l of Design Information Provide a general description of project (one paragraph). Include project limits on a reference orthophotograph ata scale of I"=500". (See Attached) Summarize stream reaches or wetland areas according to their restoration priority. (See Attached) Example Reach Length Priority Example: Reach A 1000 One (Restoration) Example: Reach B 2000 Three (Enhancement) Floodplain Information Is project located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)? r+ Yes (' No If project is located in a SFHA, check how 1t was determined: +r Redelfiwation * Detailed Study I— Limited Detail Study F- Approximate Study F- Don't know List flood zone designation: Check if applies: W AE Zone Floodway Non-EncroacNnerrt. C None F- A Zone e- Local Setbacks Required C' No Local Setbacks Required If local setbacks are required, list how many feet: Does proposed channel boundary encroach outside floodway/non- encroachmentf setbacks? r Yes r No FEMA_Floodplain_ChecMt4-23-12,docx Page 2 of 3 Land Acquisition (Check) F State owned (fee simple) F Conservation easment (Design Bid Build) tr Conservation Easement (Full Delivery Project) Note: if the project property is state-owned, then all requirements should be addressed to the Department of Administration, State Construction Office (attn: Herbert Neily, (919) 807-4101) Is community/county participating in the NFIP program? (.- Yes r No Note: if community is not participating, then all requirements should be addressed to NFIP(attn: State NFIP Engineer, (919) 715-8000) Name of Local Floodplain Administrator: Ja Ma4in- �'ibb� oc Gs Phone Number: 336-5704052 Floodplain Requirements This section to be filled by designer/applicant following verification with the LFPA F No Action F No Rise [;;,Utter of Map Revision (,,(y) VConditional Letter of Map Revision (C -?Y) �(Jther Requirements List other requirements: a -J F+=47 r y` Comments: Name: W. _Grant Lewis Signature: Title: President Date: JO 1 FEMA_Floodplain►_ClieclJist4-23-12.docx Page 3 of HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft)23026 1013 Bankfull231600.530.41600.620.39 ‐0.09 +0.02 2x Bankfull462601.60.95601.650.92 ‐0.05 +0.03 2 Yr370601.410.68601.420.68 ‐0.010.00 5 Yr650602.021.46602.091.41 ‐0.07 +0.05 10 Yr850602.551.83602.611.78 ‐0.06 +0.05 100 Yr 1800604.123.65604.23.53 ‐0.08 +0.12 22822 1217 Bankfull241600.50.53600.590.51 ‐0.09 +0.02 2x Bankfull481601.610.88601.660.83 ‐0.05 +0.05 2 Yr380601.370.79601.380.78 ‐0.01 +0.01 5 Yr650602.080.99602.14 0.93 ‐0.06 +0.06 10 Yr900602.651.08602.71.03 ‐0.05 +0.05 100 Yr 1900604.411.18604.481.13 ‐0.07 +0.05 22729 1310 Bankfull241600.190.7600.30.66 ‐0.11 +0.04 2x Bankfull481601.24 1.06601.330.95 ‐0.09 +0.11 2 Yr380600.94 1.13600.951.12 ‐0.01 +0.01 5 Yr650601.711.14601.821.02 ‐0.11 +0.12 10 Yr900602.291.22602.381.13 ‐0.09 +0.09 100 Yr 1900604.121.33604.21.27 ‐0.08 +0.06 22638 1401 Bankfull241599.84 0.76599.990.69 ‐0.15 +0.07 2x Bankfull481600.910.82601.060.68 ‐0.15 +0.14 2 Yr380600.521600.660.7 ‐0.14 +0.30 5 Yr650601.410.85601.560.72 ‐0.15 +0.13 10 Yr9006020.91602.110.83 ‐0.11 +0.08 100 Yr 1900603.861.05603.960.99 ‐0.10 +0.06 22541 1498 Bankfull241599.460.68599.670.59 ‐0.21 +0.09 2x Bankfull481600.480.97600.730.77 ‐0.25 +0.20 2 Yr380600.090.89600.330.7 ‐0.24 +0.19 5 Yr650600.981.1601.24 0.85 ‐0.26 +0.25 10 Yr900601.591.18601.771.01 ‐0.18 +0.17 100 Yr 1900603.561.19603.691.09 ‐0.13 +0.10 22339 1700 Bankfull245599.520.16599.70.38 ‐0.18 ‐0.22 2x Bankfull490600.560.28600.770.49 ‐0.21 ‐0.21 2 Yr390600.160.24600.360.46 ‐0.20 ‐0.22 5 Yr650601.060.35601.280.55 ‐0.22 ‐0.20 10 Yr900601.660.46601.80.7 ‐0.14 ‐0.24 100 Yr 1900603.580.81603.681.05 ‐0.10 ‐0.24 22239 1800 Bankfull245599.450.19599.490.43 ‐0.04 ‐0.24 2x Bankfull490600.450.34600.550.58 ‐0.10 ‐0.24 2 Yr390600.060.29600.120.57 ‐0.06 ‐0.28 5 Yr650600.94 0.41601.060.63 ‐0.12 ‐0.22 10 Yr900601.530.52601.560.8 ‐0.03 ‐0.28 100 Yr 1900603.410.84603.431.08 ‐0.02 ‐0.24 22139 1900 Bankfull245599.320.4599.310.41 +0.01 ‐0.01 2x Bankfull490600.320.49600.380.46 ‐0.06 +0.03 2 Yr390599.920.47599.94 0.47 ‐0.020.00 5 Yr650600.80.55600.890.5 ‐0.09 +0.05 10 Yr900601.370.65601.360.66 +0.01 ‐0.01 100 Yr 1900603.24 0.88603.230.89 +0.01 ‐0.01 22042 1997 Bankfull245599.10.48599.070.5 +0.03 ‐0.02 2x Bankfull490600.130.49600.210.45 ‐0.08 +0.04 2 Yr390599.710.51599.730.5 ‐0.02 +0.01 5 Yr650600.610.52600.730.47 ‐0.12 +0.05 10 Yr900601.170.61601.160.62 +0.01 ‐0.01 100 Yr 1900603.060.75603.050.76 +0.01 ‐0.01 21962 2077 Bankfull245598.960.35598.920.37 +0.04 ‐0.02 2x Bankfull490600.010.37600.110.33 ‐0.10 +0.04 ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel R E S T O R A T I O N -Travis- (Main Reach)Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft) ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel -Travis- (Main Reach)Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions 2 Yr390599.580.38599.60.37 ‐0.02 +0.01 5 Yr650600.50.4600.630.35 ‐0.13 +0.05 10 Yr900601.050.46601.04 0.47 +0.01 ‐0.01 100 Yr 1900602.950.58602.94 0.58 +0.010.00 21839 2200 Bankfull245598.680.51598.610.56 +0.07 ‐0.05 2x Bankfull490599.790.53599.910.47 ‐0.12 +0.06 2 Yr390599.310.57599.350.55 ‐0.04 +0.02 5 Yr650600.280.57600.450.49 ‐0.17 +0.08 10 Yr900600.820.68600.80.7 +0.02 ‐0.02 100 Yr 1900602.74 0.8602.720.81 +0.02 ‐0.01 21738 2301 Bankfull245598.490.37598.390.42 +0.10 ‐0.05 2x Bankfull490599.64 0.38599.790.33 ‐0.15 +0.05 2 Yr390599.130.42599.170.4 ‐0.04 +0.02 5 Yr650600.130.42600.320.36 ‐0.19 +0.06 10 Yr900600.650.52600.630.53 +0.02 ‐0.01 100 Yr 1900602.60.6602.580.6 +0.020.00 21592 2447 Bankfull245598.230.32598.20.23 +0.03 +0.09 2x Bankfull490599.470.26599.670.2 ‐0.20 +0.06 2 Yr390598.910.3599.010.24 ‐0.10 +0.06 5 Yr650599.960.3600.20.23 ‐0.24 +0.07 10 Yr900600.460.38600.450.37 +0.01 +0.01 100 Yr 1900602.4 0.54602.4 0.51 0.00 +0.03 21502 2537 Bankfull245598.14 0.17598.130.19 +0.01 ‐0.02 2x Bankfull490599.380.28599.60.32 ‐0.22 ‐0.04 2 Yr390598.810.26598.930.3 ‐0.12 ‐0.04 5 Yr650599.850.37600.110.42 ‐0.26 ‐0.05 10 Yr900600.30.55600.30.73 0.00 ‐0.18 100 Yr 1900602.230.82602.24 1.03 ‐0.01 ‐0.21 21388 2651 Bankfull245598.070.16598.04 0.22 +0.03 ‐0.06 2x Bankfull490599.290.23599.510.24 ‐0.22 ‐0.01 2 Yr390598.720.22598.830.26 ‐0.11 ‐0.04 5 Yr650599.74 0.31600.010.31 ‐0.270.00 10 Yr900600.160.46600.110.55 +0.05 ‐0.09 100 Yr 1900602.080.64602.050.7 +0.03 ‐0.06 21314 2725 Bankfull245598.04 0.1598.020.08 +0.02 +0.02 2x Bankfull490599.260.15599.480.11 ‐0.22 +0.04 2 Yr390598.680.15598.80.11 ‐0.12 +0.04 5 Yr650599.70.24599.970.17 ‐0.27 +0.07 10 Yr900600.10.34600.050.31 +0.05 +0.03 100 Yr 1900602.020.47601.990.43 +0.03 +0.04 21215 2824 Bankfull245597.970.18597.950.2 +0.02 ‐0.02 2x Bankfull490599.190.21599.4 0.31 ‐0.21 ‐0.10 2 Yr390598.610.23598.710.29 ‐0.10 ‐0.06 5 Yr650599.630.24599.880.35 ‐0.25 ‐0.11 10 Yr900600.010.34599.890.66 +0.12 ‐0.32 100 Yr 1900601.930.42601.860.65 +0.07 ‐0.23 21099 2940 Bankfull245597.90.12597.880.15 +0.02 ‐0.03 2x Bankfull490599.130.13599.30.27 ‐0.17 ‐0.14 2 Yr390598.530.14598.620.24 ‐0.09 ‐0.10 5 Yr650599.560.16599.850.11 ‐0.29 +0.05 10 Yr900599.920.21599.820.21 +0.100.00 100 Yr 1900601.850.26601.80.24 +0.05 +0.02 20609 3430 Bankfull351597.250.48597.250.48 0.000.00 2x Bankfull702598.460.77598.460.77 0.000.00 2 Yr500597.860.59597.860.59 0.000.00 5 Yr850598.830.87598.830.87 0.000.00 R E S T O R A T I O N R E S T O R A T I O N HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft) ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel -Travis- (Main Reach)Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions 10 Yr1100599.260.6599.260.6 0.000.00 100 Yr 2400601.280.77601.280.77 0.000.00 20283 3756 Bankfull351596.770.26596.770.26 0.000.00 2x Bankfull702597.790.47597.790.47 0.000.00 2 Yr500597.310.34597.310.34 0.000.00 5 Yr850598.120.55598.120.55 0.000.00 10 Yr1100598.580.69598.580.69 0.000.00 100 Yr 2400600.54 1.12600.54 1.12 0.000.00 19916 4123 Bankfull351594.94.95594.94.95 0.000.00 2x Bankfull702595.923.24595.923.24 0.000.00 2 Yr500595.24 5.23595.24 5.23 0.000.00 5 Yr850596.282.86596.282.86 0.000.00 10 Yr1100597.24 1.45597.24 1.45 0.000.00 100 Yr 2400599.54 1.09599.54 1.09 0.000.00 19442 4597 Bankfull362594.970.58594.970.58 0.000.00 2x Bankfull724596.160.6596.160.6 0.000.00 2 Yr500595.450.59595.450.59 0.000.00 5 Yr850596.490.63596.490.63 0.000.00 10 Yr1200597.320.71597.320.71 0.000.00 100 Yr 2400599.590.73599.590.73 0.000.00 18981 5058 Bankfull362594.230.22594.230.22 0.000.00 2x Bankfull724595.510.29595.510.29 0.000.00 2 Yr500594.770.24594.770.24 0.000.00 5 Yr850595.870.29595.870.29 0.000.00 10 Yr1200596.750.31596.750.31 0.000.00 100 Yr 2400599.120.39599.120.39 0.000.00 18168 5871 Bankfull362594.030.03594.030.03 0.000.00 2x Bankfull724595.250.05595.250.05 0.000.00 2 Yr500594.550.04594.550.04 0.000.00 5 Yr850595.60.06595.60.06 0.000.00 10 Yr1200596.470.08596.470.08 0.000.00 100 Yr 2400598.810.13598.810.13 0.000.00 17792 6247 Bankfull362593.910.23593.910.23 0.000.00 2x Bankfull724595.10.28595.10.28 0.000.00 2 Yr500594.410.25594.410.25 0.000.00 5 Yr850595.450.3595.450.3 0.000.00 10 Yr1200596.30.34596.30.34 0.000.00 100 Yr 2400598.610.45598.610.45 0.000.00 HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft)2311 1009 Bankfull15.1615.350.57614.490.53 +0.86 +0.04 2x Bankfull30.2615.520.87615.030.77 +0.49 +0.10 2 Yr18615.410.57614.620.59 +0.79 ‐0.02 5 Yr35615.580.9615.150.83 +0.43 +0.07 10 Yr51615.74 1.02615.51.02 +0.240.00 100 Yr 116616.231.39616.421.6 ‐0.19 ‐0.21 2251 1069 Bankfull15.1613.861.73613.431.25 +0.43 +0.48 2x Bankfull30.2614.221.44613.821.68 +0.40 ‐0.24 2 Yr18613.921.94613.521.35 +0.40 +0.59 5 Yr35614.271.59613.921.79 +0.35 ‐0.20 10 Yr51614.421.9614.182.1 +0.24 ‐0.20 100 Yr 116614.872.81614.962.54 ‐0.09 +0.27 2177 1143 Bankfull15.1612.14 0.6609.582.97 +2.56 ‐2.37 2x Bankfull30.2612.271.26609.953.57 +2.32 ‐2.31 2 Yr18612.20.64609.673.11 +2.53 ‐2.47 5 Yr35612.331.3610.04 3.71 +2.29 ‐2.41 10 Yr51612.491.49610.34.14 +2.19 ‐2.65 100 Yr 116612.972.09611.055.29 +1.92 ‐3.20 2104 1216 Bankfull15.1609.862.63605.781.29 +4.08 +1.34 2x Bankfull30.2610.251.44606.221.67 +4.03 ‐0.23 2 Yr18609.932.72605.881.37 +4.05 +1.35 5 Yr35610.281.59606.331.77 +3.95 ‐0.18 10 Yr51610.361.96606.62.21 +3.76 ‐0.25 100 Yr 116610.593.26607.4 3.24 +3.19 +0.02 2052 1268 Bankfull15.1608.660.48604.151.41 +4.51 ‐0.93 2x Bankfull30.2608.830.69604.71.57 +4.13 ‐0.88 2 Yr18608.690.57604.271.48 +4.42 ‐0.91 5 Yr35608.880.72604.831.57 +4.05 ‐0.85 10 Yr51609.010.86605.21.58 +3.81 ‐0.72 100 Yr 116609.361.22606.111.95 +3.25 ‐0.73 1981 1339 Bankfull15.1607.321.32601.981.45 +5.34 ‐0.13 2x Bankfull30.2607.551.21602.551.9 +5.00 ‐0.69 2 Yr18607.431.05602.121.54 +5.31 ‐0.49 5 Yr35607.591.32602.692.05 +4.90 ‐0.73 10 Yr51607.691.4603.082.38 +4.61 ‐0.98 100 Yr 116608.051.79604.12.87 +3.95 ‐1.08 1924 1396 Bankfull15.1605.710.89601.470.31 +4.24 +0.58 2x Bankfull30.2605.861.55602.030.43 +3.83 +1.12 2 Yr18605.711.3601.60.33 +4.11 +0.97 5 Yr35605.911.55602.150.47 +3.76 +1.08 10 Yr51606.021.92602.510.57 +3.51 +1.35 100 Yr 116606.262.78603.490.85 +2.77 +1.93 1867 1453 Bankfull15.1603.871.61601.190.25 +2.68 +1.36 2x Bankfull30.2604.031.49601.710.34 +2.32 +1.15 2 Yr18603.94 1.19601.310.27 +2.63 +0.92 5 Yr35604.061.65601.84 0.36 +2.22 +1.29 10 Yr51604.14 1.65602.180.42 +1.96 +1.23 100 Yr 116604.472.03603.14 0.62 +1.33 +1.41 1806 1514 Bankfull15.1602.320.65600.64 0.75 +1.68 ‐0.10 2x Bankfull30.2602.530.83601.04 1.19 +1.49 ‐0.36 2 Yr18602.370.72600.74 0.84 +1.63 ‐0.12 5 Yr35602.570.92601.131.32 +1.44 ‐0.40 10 Yr51602.71.17601.411.66 +1.29 ‐0.49 100 Yr 116603.011.54602.092.88 +0.92 ‐1.34 1767 1553 Bankfull15.1601.351.26600.170.41 +1.18 +0.85 2x Bankfull30.2601.551.65600.54 0.54 +1.01 +1.11 -UT 1-Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft) -UT 1-Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel 2 Yr18601.421.27600.260.44 +1.16 +0.83 5 Yr35601.621.6600.630.58 +0.99 +1.02 10 Yr51601.751.53600.910.67 +0.84 +0.86 100 Yr 116602.152.26601.671.03 +0.48 +1.23 1724 1596 Bankfull15.1600.220.9599.4 1.05 +0.82 ‐0.15 2x Bankfull30.2600.531.09599.871.01 +0.66 +0.08 2 Yr18600.271.05599.511.03 +0.76 +0.02 5 Yr35600.571.26599.961.06 +0.61 +0.20 10 Yr51600.771.68600.221.24 +0.55 +0.44 100 Yr 116600.952.05600.422.16 +0.53 ‐0.11 1648 1672 Bankfull15.1599.190.35598.030.66 +1.16 ‐0.31 2x Bankfull30.2599.30.66598.560.85 +0.74 ‐0.19 2 Yr18599.230.37598.170.71 +1.06 ‐0.34 5 Yr35599.350.65598.660.9 +0.69 ‐0.25 10 Yr51599.420.69598.931.02 +0.49 ‐0.33 100 Yr 116599.880.93599.771.29 +0.11 ‐0.36 1602 1718 Bankfull15.1598.321.17597.281.01 +1.04 +0.16 2x Bankfull30.2598.630.71597.711.43 +0.92 ‐0.72 2 Yr18598.351.37597.391.12 +0.96 +0.25 5 Yr35598.660.8597.811.54 +0.85 ‐0.74 10 Yr51598.891.04598.081.97 +0.81 ‐0.93 100 Yr 116599.711.31599.692.14 +0.02 ‐0.83 1537 1783 Bankfull15.1597.64 0.27596.810.27 +0.830.00 2x Bankfull30.2597.70.72597.20.42 +0.50 +0.30 2 Yr18597.70.27596.90.3 +0.80 ‐0.03 5 Yr35597.770.67597.270.46 +0.50 +0.21 10 Yr51597.70.63597.450.57 +0.25 +0.06 100 Yr 116599.670.85599.671.22 0.00 ‐0.37 1487 1833 Bankfull15.1596.72.61595.992.34 +0.71 +0.27 2x Bankfull30.2596.930.68596.282.81 +0.65 ‐2.13 2 Yr18596.772.73596.052.53 +0.72 +0.20 5 Yr35596.930.91596.382.98 +0.55 ‐2.07 10 Yr51597.391.84597.393.03 0.00 ‐1.19 100 Yr 116599.663.41599.662.42 0.00 +0.99 1264 2056 Bankfull16.3595.030.46595.030.22 0.00 +0.24 2x Bankfull32.6596.220.37596.220.17 0.00 +0.20 2 Yr19595.510.46595.510.22 0.00 +0.24 5 Yr36596.550.37596.550.17 0.00 +0.20 10 Yr52597.390.3597.390.11 0.00 +0.19 100 Yr 118599.660.25599.660.1 0.00 +0.15 1194 2126 Bankfull16.3595.030.08595.030.1 0.00 ‐0.02 2x Bankfull32.6596.220.09596.220.03 0.00 +0.06 2 Yr19595.510.08595.510.08 0.000.00 5 Yr36596.550.09596.550.03 0.00 +0.06 10 Yr52597.390.09597.390.04 0.00 +0.05 100 Yr 118599.660.12599.660.05 0.00 +0.07 1163 2157 Bankfull16.3595.030.06595.030.01 0.00 +0.05 2x Bankfull32.6596.220.08596.220.01 0.00 +0.07 2 Yr19595.510.06595.510.01 0.00 +0.05 5 Yr36596.550.08596.550.01 0.00 +0.07 10 Yr52597.390.1597.390.02 0.00 +0.08 100 Yr 118599.660.15599.660.04 0.00 +0.11 1094 2226 Bankfull16.3595.030.07595.030.09 0.00 ‐0.02 2x Bankfull32.6596.220.08596.220.11 0.00 ‐0.03 2 Yr19595.510.07595.510.09 0.00 ‐0.02 5 Yr36596.550.09596.550.11 0.00 ‐0.02 HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft) -UT 1-Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel 10 Yr52597.390.1597.390.12 0.00 ‐0.02 100 Yr 118599.660.12599.660.15 0.00 ‐0.03 HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft)1672 1002 Bankfull3.7612.490.54610.910.08 +1.58 +0.46 2x Bankfull7.4612.690.73611.110.12 +1.58 +0.61 2 Yr4.3612.530.57610.950.09 +1.58 +0.48 5 Yr8.8612.750.79611.160.12 +1.59 +0.67 10 Yr13612.890.95611.310.16 +1.58 +0.79 100 Yr 31613.111.23611.750.27 +1.36 +0.96 16091065Bankfull3.7610.890.54610.490.28 +0.40 +0.26 2x Bankfull7.4611.070.78610.64 0.41 +0.43 +0.37 2 Yr4.3610.920.59610.520.3 +0.40 +0.29 5 Yr8.8611.130.86610.680.46 +0.45 +0.40 10 Yr13611.24 0.98610.790.62 +0.45 +0.36 100 Yr 31611.481.42611.131.33 +0.35 +0.09 15571117Bankfull3.7609.44 0.61608.74 1.48 +0.70 ‐0.87 2x Bankfull7.4609.630.83608.91.8 +0.73 ‐0.97 2 Yr4.3609.470.65608.761.59 +0.71 ‐0.94 5 Yr8.8609.690.89608.961.83 +0.73 ‐0.94 10 Yr13609.851.09609.11.71 +0.75 ‐0.62 100 Yr 31610.051.4609.421.56 +0.63 ‐0.16 14971177Bankfull3.7607.450.7606.80.33 +0.65 +0.37 2x Bankfull7.4607.611.046070.48 +0.61 +0.56 2 Yr4.3607.480.77606.850.36 +0.63 +0.41 5 Yr8.8607.671.15607.050.53 +0.62 +0.62 10 Yr13607.761.33607.190.69 +0.57 +0.64 100 Yr 31608.031.92607.521.67 +0.51 +0.25 14651209Bankfull3.7606.110.93605.791.33 +0.32 ‐0.40 2x Bankfull7.4606.321.09605.94 1.64 +0.38 ‐0.55 2 Yr4.3606.150.95605.811.42 +0.34 ‐0.47 5 Yr8.8606.391.14605.991.65 +0.40 ‐0.51 10 Yr13606.611.39606.081.83 +0.53 ‐0.44 100 Yr 31606.881.3606.31.59 +0.58 ‐0.29 14171257Bankfull3.7604.90.36604.250.26 +0.65 +0.10 2x Bankfull7.4605.10.51604.390.35 +0.71 +0.16 2 Yr4.3604.94 0.39604.290.27 +0.65 +0.12 5 Yr8.8605.150.56604.450.38 +0.70 +0.18 10 Yr13605.20.67604.580.48 +0.62 +0.19 100 Yr 31605.51.5604.991.05 +0.51 +0.45 13761298Bankfull3.7603.44 1.48603.111.35 +0.33 +0.13 2x Bankfull7.4603.61.83603.331.67 +0.27 +0.16 2 Yr4.3603.471.57603.131.45 +0.34 +0.12 5 Yr8.8603.661.9603.371.7 +0.29 +0.20 10 Yr13603.932.37603.461.84 +0.47 +0.53 100 Yr 31604.121.79603.621.46 +0.50 +0.33 13331341Bankfull3.7601.820.46601.610.46 +0.210.00 2x Bankfull7.4602.010.68601.660.65 +0.35 +0.03 2 Yr4.3601.860.5601.64 0.49 +0.22 +0.01 5 Yr8.8602.070.76601.710.71 +0.36 +0.05 10 Yr13602.04 0.89601.820.86 +0.22 +0.03 100 Yr 31602.381.55602.322.4 +0.06 ‐0.85 1285 1389 Bankfull3.7600.121.11600.061.31 +0.06 ‐0.20 2x Bankfull7.4600.281.45600.331.54 ‐0.05 ‐0.09 2 Yr4.3600.151.2600.081.36 +0.07 ‐0.16 5 Yr8.8600.34 1.53600.371.6 ‐0.03 ‐0.07 10 Yr13600.64 1.75600.471.93 +0.17 ‐0.18 100 Yr 31600.791.7600.561.12 +0.23 +0.58 12311443Bankfull3.7598.410.44598.010.32 +0.40 +0.12 2x Bankfull7.4598.64 0.58597.980.41 +0.66 +0.17 -UT 2-Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft) -UT 2-Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel 2 Yr4.3598.460.46598.04 0.34 +0.42 +0.12 5 Yr8.8598.70.63598.020.44 +0.68 +0.19 10 Yr13598.560.75598.110.5 +0.45 +0.25 100 Yr 31599.661.52599.662.24 0.00 ‐0.72 11751499Bankfull3.7596.261.7595.731.5 +0.53 +0.20 2x Bankfull7.4596.432.18596.211.79 +0.22 +0.39 2 Yr4.3596.281.88595.751.56 +0.53 +0.32 5 Yr8.8596.482.24596.551.85 ‐0.07 +0.39 10 Yr13597.392.48597.392.08 0.00 +0.40 100 Yr 31599.660.01599.660.11 0.00 ‐0.10 HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft)1207 1005 Bankfull7.8599.550.24599.770.32 ‐0.22 ‐0.08 2x Bankfull15.6600.60.55600.84 0.41 ‐0.24 +0.14 2 Yr9600.20.27600.430.33 ‐0.23 ‐0.06 5 Yr19601.110.66601.360.45 ‐0.25 +0.21 10 Yr28601.730.79601.90.51 ‐0.17 +0.28 100 Yr 68603.710.72603.830.68 ‐0.12 +0.04 1163 1049 Bankfull7.8599.551.21599.770.15 ‐0.22 +1.06 2x Bankfull15.6600.60.42600.84 0.19 ‐0.24 +0.23 2 Yr9600.21.07600.430.16 ‐0.23 +0.91 5 Yr19601.110.35601.360.2 ‐0.25 +0.15 10 Yr28601.730.29601.90.23 ‐0.17 +0.06 100 Yr 68603.70.27603.830.28 ‐0.13 ‐0.01 1107 1105 Bankfull7.8599.550.05599.770.01 ‐0.22 +0.04 2x Bankfull15.6600.60.06600.84 0.02 ‐0.24 +0.04 2 Yr9600.20.05600.430.01 ‐0.23 +0.04 5 Yr19601.110.06601.360.02 ‐0.25 +0.04 10 Yr28601.730.07601.90.03 ‐0.17 +0.04 100 Yr 68603.70.11603.830.04 ‐0.13 +0.07 1077 1135 Bankfull7.8599.550.02599.760.03 ‐0.21 ‐0.01 2x Bankfull15.6600.60.03600.84 0.03 ‐0.240.00 2 Yr9600.20.03600.430.03 ‐0.230.00 5 Yr19601.110.04601.360.04 ‐0.250.00 10 Yr28601.730.04601.90.04 ‐0.170.00 100 Yr 68603.70.06603.830.06 ‐0.130.00 -UT 3-Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel HEC-RAS Sta.Project Sta.Profile Q Total W.S. Elev Shear Chan W.S. Elev Shear Chan (cfs)(ft)(lb/sq ft)(ft)(lb/sq ft)+/‐(ft)+/‐(lb/sq ft)1399 1013 Bankfull24.2602.690.36601.910.57 +0.78 ‐0.21 2x Bankfull48.46030.57602.520.73 +0.48 ‐0.16 2 Yr27602.730.38602.060.58 +0.67 ‐0.20 5 Yr56603.070.63602.70.81 +0.37 ‐0.18 10 Yr85603.360.84603.151.1 +0.21 ‐0.26 100 Yr 204604.71.53604.712.19 ‐0.01 ‐0.66 13391073Bankfull24.2602.24 0.59601.590.35 +0.65 +0.24 2x Bankfull48.4602.530.65602.150.6 +0.38 +0.05 2 Yr27602.290.6601.790.38 +0.50 +0.22 5 Yr56602.590.69602.420.68 +0.17 +0.01 10 Yr85602.990.88602.94 0.94 +0.05 ‐0.06 100 Yr 204604.621.19604.661.73 ‐0.04 ‐0.54 12741138Bankfull24.2601.830.29600.971.11 +0.86 ‐0.82 2x Bankfull48.4602.010.6601.851.55 +0.16 ‐0.95 2 Yr27601.790.31601.561.26 +0.23 ‐0.95 5 Yr56602.320.63602.321.41 0.00 ‐0.78 10 Yr85602.860.6602.881.1 ‐0.02 ‐0.50 100 Yr 204604.590.48604.64 0.58 ‐0.05 ‐0.10 12261186Bankfull24.2601.331.07600.780.24 +0.55 +0.83 2x Bankfull48.4601.830.3601.84 0.14 ‐0.01 +0.16 2 Yr27601.571.16601.560.22 +0.01 +0.94 5 Yr56602.280.26602.310.13 ‐0.03 +0.13 10 Yr85602.84 0.21602.870.13 ‐0.03 +0.08 100 Yr 204604.580.18604.64 0.16 ‐0.06 +0.02 11661246Bankfull24.2600.910.03600.74 0.05 +0.17 ‐0.02 2x Bankfull48.4601.80.04601.830.05 ‐0.03 ‐0.01 2 Yr27601.550.03601.550.05 0.00 ‐0.02 5 Yr56602.260.04602.310.05 ‐0.05 ‐0.01 10 Yr85602.830.05602.870.06 ‐0.04 ‐0.01 100 Yr 204604.580.08604.630.09 ‐0.05 ‐0.01 11201292Bankfull24.2600.80.03600.710.07 +0.09 ‐0.04 2x Bankfull48.4601.790.04601.820.06 ‐0.03 ‐0.02 2 Yr27601.54 0.03601.550.07 ‐0.01 ‐0.04 5 Yr56602.260.04602.30.06 ‐0.04 ‐0.02 10 Yr85602.820.05602.860.07 ‐0.04 ‐0.02 100 Yr 204604.570.08604.630.1 ‐0.06 ‐0.02 10671345Bankfull24.2600.570.04600.690.04 ‐0.120.00 2x Bankfull48.4601.770.05601.810.06 ‐0.04 ‐0.01 2 Yr27601.54 0.04601.54 0.05 0.00 ‐0.01 5 Yr56602.250.05602.30.06 ‐0.05 ‐0.01 10 Yr85602.810.06602.860.07 ‐0.05 ‐0.01 100 Yr 204604.570.08604.630.09 ‐0.06 ‐0.01 -UT 4-Proposed Conditions Existing Conditions ∆ W.S. Elev ∆ Shear, Channel River StaPlanW.S. ElevW.S. ElevProf Top Encro.Encro.Project Impact100 yr.100 yr.Delta WSWdth ActSta LTSta RT100 yr.w/FW Revised-Corr Eff(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) (ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) 27950Revised619.67620.120.467013301400 0.0027950Corrected619.67620.120.467013301400 27950Duplicate619.67620.150.487013301400 27770Revised619.05619.500.4510013271427 0.0027770Corrected619.05619.500.4510013271427 27770Duplicate619.06619.540.4910013271427 26840Revised617.34617.880.5420015301730 0.0026840Corrected617.34617.880.5420015301730 26840Duplicate617.45618.050.6020015301730 26070Revised616.85617.420.5725016001850 0.0026070Corrected616.85617.420.5725016001850 26070Duplicate617.00617.640.6425016001850 25340Revised616.61617.020.4020017451945 0.0025340Corrected616.61617.020.4020017451945 25340Duplicate616.79617.280.5020017451945 23335Revised615.68615.690.0118016101790 0.0023335Corrected615.68615.690.0118016101790 23335Duplicate615.93616.130.1918016101790 23245Revised615.61615.62 16516351800 0.0023245Corrected615.61615.62 16516351800 23245Duplicate615.88616.020.1412016351755 23201Revised614.23614.24 2816791707 0.0023201Corrected614.23614.24 2816791707 23201Duplicate615.86614.93 2816791707 23181 CulvertCulvert 23160Revised610.55610.54 2816791707 0.0023160Corrected610.55610.54 2816791707 23160Duplicate610.55612.421.882816791707 23110Revised606.17606.820.64174274448 -0.1723110Corrected606.34607.280.93196165361 23110Duplicate611.51612.260.766016651725 22970Revised605.86606.450.59203285488 -0.2022970Corrected606.06607.010.95277198475 22970Duplicate611.01611.690.6812016451765 WSEs in NGVD 29 Datum River StaPlanW.S. ElevW.S. ElevProf Top Encro.Encro.Project Impact100 yr.100 yr.Delta WSWdth ActSta LTSta RT100 yr.w/FW Revised-Corr Eff(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) 22440Revised605.58606.090.51112178290 -0.1322440Corrected605.71606.590.88112178290 22440Duplicate608.63609.230.6014016021742 22110Revised605.30605.850.55205153358 -0.1222110Corrected605.42606.380.97205153358 21750Revised605.09605.610.51173270443 -0.0921750Corrected605.18606.191.01271148419 21750Duplicate606.62607.310.6916015951755 21270Revised604.99605.480.49223230453 -0.0221270Corrected605.01606.021.01198290488 21270Duplicate605.62606.020.4015012101360 21250Revised604.99605.480.49237224461 -0.0121250Corrected605.00605.760.7680409489 21250Duplicate605.60606.050.4416012001360 21085Revised604.96605.440.48262313575 0.0021085Corrected604.96605.750.79260210470 21085Duplicate605.49605.940.4519011601350 21075Revised604.96605.440.48259316574 0.0021075Corrected604.96605.760.80265210475 21075Duplicate605.49605.900.4222512001425 21030Revised604.95605.430.48280253533 0.0021030Corrected604.95605.680.74225135360 21030Duplicate605.44605.870.4323511781413 20970Revised604.93605.410.47320207527 0.0020970Corrected604.93605.630.7127565340 20970Duplicate605.39605.810.4326018852145 20230Revised604.48604.900.4217020502220 0.0020230Corrected604.48604.900.4217020502220 20230Duplicate604.51604.930.4217020502220 19430Revised602.84603.580.7418020302210 0.0019430Corrected602.84603.580.7418020302210 19430Duplicate602.87603.600.7318020302210 17790Revised600.75601.420.6715012651415 0.0017790Corrected600.75601.420.6715012651415 17790Duplicate600.80601.450.6615012651415 16030Revised596.35597.090.7412913671497 0.0016030Corrected596.35597.090.7412913671497 16030Duplicate596.35597.090.7412913671497 Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Appendices Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Appendix G Performance Bond Mitigation Plan (Contract No. 5791) Appendices Aycock Springs Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC Alamance County, North Carolina Per the NC EEP RFP #: 16-005568, Restoration Systems will provide financial assurance in one of the following forms: 1) Performance Bonding – The Offeror must provide security in the form of acceptable performance bonds as described in the following paragraph to guarantee delivery of the maximum number of originally contracted Mitigation Units. The performance bonds must be obtained from a company licensed in North Carolina as shown in the Federal Treasury Listing of Approved Sureties (Circular 570). The maximum allowable amount provided by a surety may not exceed the “underwriting limitation” for the surety as identified in the Federal Treasury Listing. Although this RFP is a request for mitigation and not construction, the performance bonds shall follow the prescribed wording provided in N.C.G.S. § 44A-33. The Offeror must provide two performance bonds. The first bond must be for 100% of the total value of the contract and must be in effect and submitted with the Task 3 deliverable (see Section 8. SCOPE OF WORK – Task 3) before EEP will authorize payment for that deliverable. The bond must remain in effect until the Offeror has received written notification from the EEP that the requirements of Task 6 (submittal of baseline monitoring report) have been met. After the successful completion of Task 6, the bond can be retired and a second bond must be substituted for the first. The second bond must be for 40% of the value of the contract, which covers the monitoring period. The Monitoring Phase Performance Bond can be reduced yearly concurrent with the payment schedule once the yearly deliverable is approved by EEP and credits are released by the IRT. 2) Letters of Credit- LOCs must be drawn from a reputable Bank identified by the FDIC as “Well Capitalized” or “Adequately Capitalized” and follow the submittal timing, contract amounts and schedules for reduction as those described above for the performance bonds. Evergreen or irrevocable Letters of Credit shall be required to provide a 120 day notice of cancellation, termination or non-renewal. 3) Casualty Insurance on underlying performance of Credits or Units of Restoration – Must follow the same submittal timing, contract amounts and reduction schedules as those described above in performance bonds. The insurance must contain the following information. a) The “NC DENR” must be named as the “Regulatory Body”. NC DENR shall have the sole right to place a claim against the policy. NC DENR shall have the sole right and obligation as the responsible “regulatory body” to approve any claim settlement. b) Initial insurance must be for a 10 year period. The process of evaluating these options is underway. Once obtained, RS will provide digital and hard copies of the assurance of distribution to IRT members.