HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150252 Ver 1_401 Application_20150315LP
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc
www.cwenv.com
March 3, 2015
Mr David Brown
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -2638
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N Salisbury Street, 9's Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Rhododendron Lake Park Phase H
Henderson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr Brown and Ms. Higgins,
20150252
The attached Pre- Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of the Town of
Laurel Park represented by Ms Alison Melmkova The proposed project is located along Lake
Drive in Laurel Park, Henderson County, North Carolina The town is seeking a Nationwide
Permit 42 and 27 for the restoration of Rhododendron Lake and unnamed tributaries to Wash
Creek.
A copy of this package has been sent to Ms Andrea Leslie of the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission and Mr Bryan Tompkins of the US Fish and Wildlife Service for review A
courtesy copy of this application has also been submitted to Mr Zan Price of the NC Division of
Water Resources, Asheville Regional Office Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828 -698-
9800 if you have any questions or comments
Respectfully,
L�
Kevin Mitchell
Biologist
Copy Furnished:
NC Division of Water Resources, Asheville — Zan Price
NC Wildlife Resources Commission — Andrea Leslie
US Fish and Wildlife Service — Bryan Tompkins
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, NC 28792
828 - 698 -9800 Tel
828 - 698 -9003 Fax
R Clement Riddle, *W.
Principal
Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info
1 Project Name Rhododendron Lake Park Phase I1
2 Name of Property Owner /Applicant Town of Laurel Park, Ms Alison Melmkova
3. Name of Consultant/Agent. Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
*Agent authorization needs to be attached
4 Related/previous Action ID numbers(s):
5 Site Address: Lake Drive
6 Subdivision Name: n/a
7 City: Laurel Park
8 County Henderson
9 Lat: 35.310543N Long - 82.487149W (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name. Hendersonville
11 Waterway: Wash Creek
12. Watershed- French Broad 06010105
13 Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 42 & 27
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre - Application Request
The following information will be completed by the Corps office
AID.
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization- Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/Nature of Activity/Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:
CCe r aver
Department of the Army NCDENR
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers NC DWI;, Webscape Unit
Attn Scott McLendon, Chief Regulatory Division Attn Karen Higgins
PO Box 1890 512 North Salisbury Street
Wilmington, NC 28402 -1890 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
I, the current landowner /managing partner of the property identified below, hereby
authorize ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc (CEC) to act on my behalf as my
agent during the processing of junsdictional determination requests and permits to impact
Wetlands and Water of the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. CEC is
authorized to provide supplemental information as needed at the request of the USACE
or DWR.
Additionally, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, US Army Corps of
Engineers to enter upon the property herein described for the purposes of conducting on-
site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Wetlands and Waters of
the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Property Owner of Record: / OWYt of R4
Property Owner of Address: `' /y/17 �- / 1I�� D,-
�Mhde�sCr7 y►lle ,, A) G nag 7 3
Phone Number: S? a9 - C, q 3 - I-19z -10
Property Location: ��i Ke Di vF - PI. JS Le /CL-)
Owner/Managing Partner
Printed Name: j Q- er- P. / , eo Yef cczk", V/fd
jlll '
Owner/Managing Partner Signature-
Date. c,2 • • ���5
g55gRS (,j?33
,155 S 16, S l 224 South Grove Street, Suite F
q 5 ( Soy 1{,63 Hendersonville, NC 28792
Phone: 828 - 698 -9800
www.cwenv.com
O�O� WA Tc
I 1 >
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN ) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
lb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 42, 27 or General Permit (GP) number.
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been venfied by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
ld
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWO (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWO 401
Certification
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit -
❑ Yes ® No
if
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in4leu
fee program
❑ Yes ® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ® No
1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project-
Rhododendron Lake Park Phase II
2b
County
Henderson
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Laurel Park
2d
Subdivision name
n/a
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
n/a
3.
Owner Information 0
1 i
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed-
Town of Laurel Park
HI
3b
Deed Book and Page No.
1437/393,13931200,1494/335, 218/016
MAR 9 0015
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Contact: Alison Melnikova
DENR
- WATER RESOURCES
3d
Street address
441 White Pine Drive
3e
City, state, zip
Laurel Park, NC 28739
3f.
Telephone no.
828 - 693 -4840
3g
Fax no.
n/a
3h
Email address
n/a
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
R. Clement Riddle
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc
5c
Street address
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
5d
City, state, zip
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
5e
Telephone no
828 -698 -9800
5f
Fax no
n/a
5g
Email address
clement @cwenv.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a. Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
9558956833, 9558968132, 9568061663, 9568061771
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 310543N Longitude -82 487149W
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c
Property size
+/- 9 9 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
UT Wash Creek
proposed project
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
B
2c
River basin
French Broad
3.
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Existing conditions on the site include a lake, a recently completed stream restoration project (2 8 acres), and a greenway
trail for recreation and educational purposes General land use in the vicinity includes residential and recreation.
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0.07 acres within the project boundary
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
Approximately 185 linear feet of stream channel flow into the existing lake The water is diverted from the restored
stream 1,352 linear feet of UT to Wash Creek were restored in 2013 Approximately 323 linear feet of stream exist
downstream of the restored reach
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project.
The Town of Laurel Park received a grant from the Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) to enable the
restoration of Rhododendron Lake and unnamed tributaries to Wash Creek. The purpose of this project is to make
improvements to the stream and lake in Laurel Park by enhancing stormwater management and restoring and stabilizing
streams and wetlands
3e
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The proposed project will include dredging of the existing lake to remove excess sediment and creating a forebay to
handle stormwater and future sediment input The existing open water pond (1.10 acres) area will be reshaped during
this project. The new pond will be 1 10 acres upon completion A proposed 20 foot culvert is required for the forebay
The dredging of the lake would be implemented using typical construction and earth moving equipment Temporary
access areas are proposed in order to remove sediment from the lake.
The proposed project will also include a new stream restoration, wetland creation (littoral shelf), and bank stabilization to
improve water quality and act as an educational demonstration A new stream (88 10 is proposed to link the existing
diversion channel to the proposed forebay The wetland creation (0 05 ac) will include a 10 -12 foot wide gently sloping
(6 1 slope) littoral shelf planted with native vegetation Bank stabilization (323 If) is being proposed in the downstream
reach (Impact #1) to include reslopng of the banks and planting with native riparian trees and shrubs
The project will also include the installation of a 30 foot culvert to connect two upland areas of the park
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property I
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
El Yes ®No ❑Unknown
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)
Agency /Consultant Company
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
S.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams - tnbutanes ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construcbon
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f.
Wetland impact
Type oflunsdicbon
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W8 ® P ❑ T
Impact 98
❑ Yes
® Corps
05
Fill
® No
® DWQ
W ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W ❑ P [:IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
05
2h Comments
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Impact #1
Bank Stabdizabon
UT Wash Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
4
323
S2 ® P ❑ T
Impact #2
Culvert
UT Wash Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
4
30
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
353
31 Comments
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
03 ❑ P ®T
Rhododendron Lake
Impact #3
Lake
17
(Temporary Access- Fill)
04 ®P ❑ T
Rhododendron Lake
Impact #4
Lake
05
(Proposed Wetland - Fill)
05 ®P ❑ T
Rhododendron Lake
Impact #5
Lake
002
(Proposed Culvert)
06 ®P ❑ T
Rhododendron Lake
Impact #6
Lake
.03
07 ®P El T
Rhododendron Lake
Impact #7
Lake
006
(Proposed Stream — Fill)
09 ®P ❑ T
Rhododendron Lake
Impact #9
Lake
03
(Fill)
010 ® P ❑ T
Rhododendron Lake
Impact #10
Lake
08
(Fill)
4f. Total open water impacts
037
4g. Comments Impact # 7 is a proposed new stream (8810 that will impact open water and the edge of the existing wetland
labeled Impact #8
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c.
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g Comments,
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No if yes, permit ID no
5i Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑ PEI T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
133 ❑P [IT
El Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Stream crossings will be installed perpendicular to the stream flow and all work will be conducted from high ground
1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Construction equipment will be operated from high ground Temporary construction access areas will be used in the lake to
provide access for dredging Removed sediment will be disposed of and stabilized in an upland location
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an Impact within a protected npanan buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-tieu fee fund).
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why Impervious surface will not be added as
a result of this project
2d
if this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Henderson
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
F
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit applications
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result In
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater will not be generated as a result of this project
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
FWS County data and Natural Heritage Program GIS data
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS Impact will not occur in a marine system.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tnbal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ❑ No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places records maintained by the NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and
available on SHPO's HPOWEB GIS service The Stillwell House II (NPS Reference #02000933) is located approximately
4,000 feet to the northeast from the project site It is the opinion of CEC, that the proposed activity is not likely to threaten
the integrity of these sites
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodpiain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements The applicant is working with Henderson County to obtain a no rise
certification
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Map Service Center Map Panel 3700955800J,
3700956800J (effective date 10/2/2008)
c-
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only d an authorization letter from the applicant
Is provided
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Rhododendron Lake Park Phase II ( +/- 9.9 Acres)
k'Irncnt Dr
M�wO9pr y's F3r� �1s �' '
O
1 D` s � 9� R�
�nrG�e' ype )lvan 8!� S Jh Sul,, .::n
� SAO DI 9 ty � Pa•� 'F
hD,
x "
�rNPy�p yu9 koO co 'J
A i Lp l o t° tee a °o Pare
L h r a
°rnron PI
n� Laurel r °
�S Park ,dt^ 91h Ave Yr z
�. as
° r
rr n 8reyartl Rtl 6th
o N
Av w M a � Z ai
v n 2S' C'o Sr ~ 5t
'e D' oPtl Dr J e 7th Ave Vim4 –° E x e lonoe
c p
c = y 04, Hendersonville 194 n
ve J
o° OS a s Z th Are E s
> i o
Pry f ° ° 7 a W ^- rs w 6th All t E
`SprrO D c,ke Acan Project Boundary o p sib AV* stn Ave V1 , a u
> ° Hendersonville
b° Ctib 00ts Ln Sth Aft W ° _
3 O Nr4'h�Cre Dr — Su' Aye W N ? xdA 1slAvtE
reW
r
Jordan St o ist Ave W rn QAllmst
Vt �
et Dr / ,r a l;rm
DS ter Crr n
it Dr ,Qt j � eRyetng J 4rfijpo°yyt $1 ; pSt y to Pars 9
•t 7 g a Va a YI Pt ° � n
Qa °a
.(–r.—
ha
Dale Sly o W
s Grove st
Yrood°`Ife to
r• N
rPd
G`
M'kon S/i
Palk Ur
yGr
Het6°nRd
sec onRd st whlfe
tot Sf
klllvl °w1J
��
aPatrtad
kenaer,cn�il e
Cr- qfl } -hrt:
G
51 q►
t
t1
Fairway�r
Q Robin 31
tt°ytt �tpd+' �
Gn r •
p
r.43
_ In
N S E t
reed,
°4
GOUnS
y
v v r
c
Club
Rd
d e4
i JO °v
` willow Rd
ckeru
St
d
f
e�l� l�
ey St
Slanwood Ln
a pye
APPledet
Srir;,n Drake
St
7d
hen
school St
Q
�a
H
u° Gibbs St
o
6�4
04
3
o
f
0-
Heaton St
AP+ A
v u
La S`pe Ot u
p•►r°od t:tr xe 0 T
etas S'
H
fi yQ� O .0
Legend y
d
1 —�— I Project Boundary
N,
Dram by: RKM 22&,76, CEC PwimW 794
4
O� Crrdrer R
Okla ct,'00099 n N
Krlj
rkn
o• 0 5001,000 2,000
t `' Feet
ri 'mm Wale f Site Vicinity
Henderson County, Figure 1
North Carolina
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, Nonh Carolina 28792
Rhododendron Lake Park Phase 11 ( +/- 9.9 Acres)
'k SIX
At
rr Bounda �
Tlyi ii
ti
1W
-map! 1
U dp
W. .
- -U�
i: kT4 0 It ��" V ra-k I
OVA% 4
r +i L
1
�� ■ sit l
Legend
i L
Project Boundary It>h bey ;
Henderson County, CLearWater
Y.
North Carolina
224 Soulh Grove Street, Suite F
I lendersonville, North Carolina 28792
•
lif '
0 5001,000 2,000
Feet
USGS "topographic Map
Hendersonville Quad
Figure 2
1
Figure 3
Impact Map
3
S
i
f
L.AUREL PARK HWY
b
�r yf
VICINTrYMO Nat to scale
^n- Rod or Path G d.
-12' NOTE
Cuh.d to b. omb.d..d
Info Wailes slim
b.d
5n,— ,t- Lvmw -{-
pip. I. a 4 I P
nld 1x :
Z� � � _ _ _ • ln.n PIP.
Q—k e.d
CuM11 le b. Cuh.rl
CInD.dd.d
I.,. cn.k led
CULVERT IN STREAM
Not Iv S-1.
R11sr R
1� I
NOTE
Contractor to remove sediment
from existing lake and place
In sediment disposal area
V�
/
Proposed sediment
disposal area
•
• • f•
0
•
J
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
X
/ .� / /
,
/, _ ♦♦
Impact #1
Bank Stabilization 323 LF
/ • Impact #2
e Proposed Culvert 30 LF
Sireom (Unnamed
tributary to Wash Creek)
i
Conservation Easement
• Water Level
• Depth 8'
I-
�/ .. r •' . =111= I 1 111111111
II'111� III -11
Foreboy
Existing overflow culvert
Repaired Stand Pipe and
Drain Pipe
Existing drainage swaie
Impact #3
♦♦ Temporary Lake Bed
Impact Area 17 Ac
Existing lake boundary NOTE-
Contractors equipment to stay
04c: Boardwalk on Temporary Lake Bed Impact
I I Y �,
Impact Area and reach into lake bed
4
#
P
Proposed Wetland .05 Ac to remove sediment
• / ( �1��ti, �.
• z �_ ' r'
Impact #9
/ // / - =,� ti r; • Proposed Fill .03 Ac
/ Proposed lake expansion boundary
• / \ LLLL Impact #5
♦ / LLLL r
/\ • Proposed Culvert 20 LF
/ Existing Welland (to be preserved)
Impact #6
Proposed FIII 03 Ac
Proposed Foreboy
S
r Impact #7
•
Proposed Stream 88 Lf
/� • Impact #10
r
It Proposed Fill 08 Ac
• Existing lake boundary
- -'-" /� 1 ®+ - ®- - Impact #8 .05 Ac
/ j • - FIII Existing Wetland LAKE & WETLAND
/ / ► Existing Stream (to be preserved) RESTORATION PERMITTING
/ Existing Diversion Pipe PLAN e!
Property Une
+ ® Stream (Unnamed
inbulory to Wash Cre
� o as so 103 aoc
DRIVE
LEGEND
Existing
Total Open Waters- 1 10 Ac
Total Wetlands 07 Ac
Total Stream Reach- 508 Lf
Jill
I I Ills,111
Proposed
Total Open Waters. 1.10 Ac
Wetland Impact Area- .05 Ac
Additional Stream Length 88 Lf
Temporary Lakebed Impact Area 17 Ac
Permanent Lakebed Impact Area. 14 Ac rr
New Wetland: .05 Ac
Water Level
Depth 8' / /Stand Pipe
Depth 11' I— (I a
-III I I I I -III -III
-I I I =I I I -I I I =I I I-_ I I I=I I I=I II=I I I =1 I F1 I I- M
l- I M I I_I 11 -I I I I I I_I I I_I 11 -„ 1 o Y
Lake (�
FOREBAY AND LAKE DEPTH 5
Nvl Iv S.W.
APPROYM bras or tom- ^ti
or (fYPTj��OR�1 . AAll
rNSIFa QVX Daum
txosort mlrlROt WTEtM ed Ba mm
ME pRffm=m
ft
AM WMIDNINT06 M Q� Ulu
sAsm ON - 1/2 Loc e _ 1N CAR eG 9-
Tt � K
T 5
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION Q t
Not 1. 5.0. ~~^�
oe1. c � nr
n, -n Frm, rc
Water Elevation
Water Depth over
-I I I =III =1 I FE=
shelf 9 " -18" deep -11-111= 11L-111-111= =1
I I1 =11= - _'
= III =11 10' -12' wide gently
11 =III= III =11 sloping Littorlal Shelf
-III= III= III =III p 9
III -111= III =11 planted with native LAKE &
I.III =III =III wetlond plants WET[ API-
-t:. RCS10RATION'
�CRMI i uvC
PLAN
GLITTORIAL SHELF LA -1
Nol to Seale
1 OF I
Rhododendron Lake Park Phase II ( +/- 9.9 Acres)
Project Boundary k
11 i
+ i Cc
;r
co I
+I
I
DeB j
1
Legend
�— — ! Project Boundary
Soils
Co - Codorus
DeB - Delanco
EdE - Edneyville
HyC - Hayesville
W - Water
N4
Henderson County,
North Carolina
J ,
w
i
i
Ir"
I j
1 �
N
0 62.5 125 250
Feet
[LearWater
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, Nonh Carolina 28792
USDA Soils Map
Figure 4
M•�_ __ __ __ rim `i�/. ".� +"` - -
"-�f t
5 `
}1
ry r`•�x!
eA
Project Boundary
r
Af
°E
i1
s
.1 1
` i 1
0 62.5 125 250
Rhododendron Lake Park Phase II ( +/- 9.9 Acres)
FEMA Map Panels
3700955800J
3700956800J
Legend
�— — Project Boundary
® 100 Year Floodplain
Drawn 26.15; CEC PM!ea 741
Henderson County,
North Carolina
Project Boundary
CLearWaEer
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
'�• I r
,i
r �
r
f i
i
I r
I
i'
i,
i
i
N
0 62.5 125 250
Feet
FEMA Floodplain Map
FEMA Map Service Center
Figure 6
Jurisdictional Determination Information
Rhododendron Lake Park Phase II ( +/- 9.9 Acres)
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters iderhfied on this map have been located within
sub -meter accuracy uldmng a Trimble mapping grade Global Positioning System
(GPS) ano the subsequent differential correction of that data GPS points may
demonstrate unconeclable errors cue to topography, vegetative cover, andlor
murt.pam signal error
Note The illustrated wetland and stream locations are approximale These areas
have been flagged in the field, however, they have not been surveyed. Although
ClearWaler Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident In our assessment,
the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only agency that can make final
decislons regarding jurisdictional wetland and waters of the US delineations.
Therefore, all preliminary determinal,ons are subject to change until written
venficabon is obtained CEC strongly recommends that written verification be
obtained from the Corps pnor to closing on the property, beginning any site work,
or making any legal reliance on this determination
This map was prepared by CEC using the bast information available to CEC at the
time of production This map is for informational purposes only and should not be
used to delermine precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor
legal descriptions This map snail not be construed to be an offiaal survey of arty
data depicted
Source Data Henderson County and Field Collected Data
'j, 1
� f
i
i
i
i
'lit 7 tom'
.. iySi•
t
- a�a
r!
4 '
N
0 62.5 125 250
Feet
CLearWater Stream & Wetland
Henderson County. Delineation Map
North Carolina Delineated January 19, 2015
224 South Grove Strcct, Suite F
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792 Figure 7
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section iV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION]: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State NC County/pansh/borough Henderson City Hendersonville
Center coordinates of site (]at/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 31054311 N, Long -82 487149° j
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody UT Wash Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows French Broad
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) French Broad 06010105
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
Check if other sites (e g, oftle mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SiTE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination Date
Q Field Determination Date(s)
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Imo "navigable waters of the U S" within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [ Regired]
Q Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There 0 "waters of the US" within Clean Water Act (CWA) junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): i
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Q Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Q Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of junsdictional waters
® Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area.
Non - wetland waters 508 linear feet 34 width (ft) and/or 1 i acres
Wetlands 0 07 acres
c Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on987jDtJlneatiMannal
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2. Non - regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not junsdictional
Explain
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropnate sections in Section III below
For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e g, typically 3 months)
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section 111 F
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.I. only, if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A 1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III B below
1. TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent"
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and Its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and ofisitc. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(1) General Area Conditions-
Watershed size +List
Drainage area +Idst
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tributary flows through ENTER tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are WMI`t river miles from TNW
Project waters are c1List river miles from RPW
Project waters are ck ;List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are ek aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5
Tributary stream order, if known
' Note that the instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West
` Flow route can be desenbed by identifying, c g, tnbutary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tributary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man -made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man - altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width feet
Average depth feet
Average side slopes PickL
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type/ ° /a cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition /stability [e g , highly eroding, sloughing banks) Explain
Presence of run/nffle/pool complexes Explain
Tributary geometry irlc�_I°— is_t —is_t
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for FUTLMd
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year MickI t
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is ekiList. Characteristics
Subsurface flow � Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
❑ shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
❑ sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWAjunsdiction (check all that apply)
® High Tide Line indicated by ® Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum,
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings,
❑ physical markings/charactenstics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(iii) Chemical Characteristics-
Characterize tributary (e g , water color is clear, discolored, oily film, water quality, general watershed characteristics, etc )
Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g, where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break to the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (c g , Row over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'ibid
(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor Characteristics (type, average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish /spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW
Flow is eis�Iiet Explain
Surface Flow is: P
Characteristics
Subsurface flow , ` iI.1a Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adiacency Determination with Non -TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by benr/bamer Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are L river miles from TNW
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from FW
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain
(h) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e g , water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface, water quality, general watershed
characteristics, etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics (type, average width)
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish /spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis MIc°lt°t
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis
For each wetland, specify the following
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW9
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW9
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs7
• Does the tnbutary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW9
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly Into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section 111 D
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tnbutary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section iII D
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section ill D
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
® TNWs linear feet width (ft), Or, acres
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round arejunsdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial Strong bed and bank Continuous flow during periods of low precipitation
Tributaries of TNW where tnbutanes have continuous flow "seasonally" (e g, typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111 B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
® Tributary waters 508 linear feet 34 width (ft)
® Other non - wetland waters 1.1 acres
identify type(s) of waters Open Water
Non -RPWse that now directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IiI C
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
Q Tnbutary waters linear feet width (ft)
® Other non - wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly Into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year -round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section 111 D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetlands discharge into the pond that discharges directly into UT to Wash Creek.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally " Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section iII D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area 0.07 acres
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that now directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tnbutary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for junsdicttonal wetlands in the review area acres
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
15 Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section 111 C
Provide estimates for junsdicttonal wetlands in the review area acres
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains junsdicttonal
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U S ," or
® Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categones presented above (1 -6), or
® Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
® which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
® from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
which are or could be used for mdustnal purposes by industries in interstate commerce
Q Interstate isolated waters Explain
® Other factors Explain
identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
"See Footnote 4 3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section Ill D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with The process described in the Corps/EPA Meinarandunt Regarding CN'A Act Jurisdicdon Following Rapanos.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Q Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
® Other non - wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Q Wetlands acres
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)-
10 If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in ' SIVANCC,' the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR)
r Waters do not meet the 'Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for Junsdiction Explain
Other (explain, if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non -junsdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of Junsdiction is the MBR
factors (i e , presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for imgated agriculture), using best professional
Judgment (check all that apply)
Q Non - wetland waters (i C, rivers, streams) linear feet width (ft)
® Lakes/ponds acres
Q Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non- lunsdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus' standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply)
® Non - wetland waters (i e , nvers, streams) linear feet, width (ft)
El Lakes /ponds acres
® Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑� Wetlands acres
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
Q Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
Q Data sheets prepared by the Corps
Q Corps navigable waters' study
Q U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 1 24K, Hendersonville
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
® State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
® FEMA/FiRM maps
Q 100 -year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date) NCCGIA, 2010.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
[] Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
® Applicable/supporting case law
® Applicable /supporting scientific literature
Other information (please specify)
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD- This JD applies to the streams, wetlands, and open water associated with the project
Henderson County, NC Tax Parcel Report Friday, January 23, 2015
Parcel Intorrnation
Parcel Number:
Listed to:
Mailing Address:
Mailing City, State, Zip:
Physical Address:
Deed:
Date Recorded:
1013336
LAUREL PARK TOWN OF
441 WHITE PINE DR
HENDERSONVLLE,NC
28739
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
1437/393
08/13/2010
Revenue Stamps: 0
Property Description: Lot * LAKE DRIVE ON
Map Sheet:
9558.12
Assessed Acreage:
0.8200
Building Value:
$0.00
Land Value:
$46,300.00
Value To Be Billed:
$0.00
Pin:
9558956833
Neighborhood:
LAUREL PK/OLDER
SECT.
Township:
Hendersonville
Municipality:
LAUREL PARK
Fire District:
Plat:
SLID 8113
Elementary School
BRUCE DRYSDALE
District:
Middle School District:
HENDERSONVILLE
MIDDLE
High School District:
HENDERSONVILLE
HIGH
Soil:
Water
Voting Precinct:
Laurel Paris
Commissioner District
5
Agricultural District
None Found
Henderson County WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
North 200 North Grove Street All inrormalion or data provided (whether subscribed, purchased or otherwise distributed) is provided as is, without any
Hendersonville. NC 26792 warranties, including the warranties at merrharnnbility or or fitness for a particular purpose. Henderson County and its
:Iitm P: (828) 69&5124 employees make no warranties or guarantees, either express or Implied. Use of the Information or data subscribed,
F: (825) 69 8-5122 purchased or otherwise distributed, whether in hard copy or digital media shall be at the user's own risk.
Henderson County. NC Tax Parcel Resort Thursday, January 22, 2015
Parcel Irdorrnatbn
Parcel Number:
9941900
Pin:
9558968132
Listed to:
LAUREL PARK TOWN OF
Neighborhood:
LAUREL PK/OLDER
P: (828) 69M124
employees make no warranties or guarantees, either express or implied. Use of the Information or data subscribed,
F: (028) 698 -5122
SECT.
Mailing Address:
441 WHITE PINE DR
Township:
Hendersonville
Mailing City, State, Zip:
LAUREL PARK, NC 28739
Municipality:
LAUREL PARK
Physical Address:
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
Fire District:
Deed:
13931200
Plat:
SL.D 8823
Date Recorded:
04/21/2009
Elementary School
BRUCE DRYSDALE
District:
Revenue Stamps:
Middle School District:
HENDERSONVILL.E
MIDDLE
Property Description:
Lot S LAKE LAUREL PARK
High School District:
HENDERSONVILLE
MAP B /51
HIGH
Map Sheet:
9558.12
Soil:
Codorus loam (arkaqua)
Assessed Acreage:
6.5900
Voting Precinct:
Laurel Park
Building Value:
$0.00
Commissioner District
5
Land Value:
$41,700.00
Agricultural District
None Found
Value To Be Billed:
$0.00
!
Henderson County !
WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
Geographic Infomutbn Systems (GIS)
200 North Grow Street
AN Information or del& provided (whether subscribed, purchased or otherwise distributed) Is provided as Is, without any
Hendersonville. NC 28792
warranties, Including the warranties of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. Henderson Courtly and its
P: (828) 69M124
employees make no warranties or guarantees, either express or implied. Use of the Information or data subscribed,
F: (028) 698 -5122
purchased or otherwise disbfbuied, whether In herd copy or digital media, shelf be at the user's own risk.
Henderson County. NC Tax Parcel ReDort Thursday, January 22, 2015
Parch IrNonnation
Parcel Number. 1014800
Listed to: LAUREL PARK TOWN OF
Mailing Address: 441 WHITE PINE DR
Mailing City, State, Zip: LAUREL PARK, NC 28735
Physical Address: 0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
Deed: 1494/335
Date Recorded: 04/30/2012
Revenue Stamps: 0
Property Description:
Lot err THE SUHRIE
Henderson County
SUB - DIVISION
Map Sheet:
9568.09
Assessed Acreage:
1.9600
Building Value:
$0.00
Land Value:
$23,500.00
Value To Be Billed:
$0.00
Pin:
Neighborhood:
Township:
Municipality:
Fire District:
Plat:
Elementary School
District:
9568061663
LAUREL PK/OLDER
SECT.
Hendersonville
LAUREL PARK
B 301A
BRUCE DRYSDALE
Middle School District:
HENDERSONVILLE
Henderson County
MIDDLE
High School District:
HENDERSONVILLE
200 North Grove Street
HIGH
Soil:
Codorus loam (arkaqua)
Voting Precinct
Laurel Park
Commissioner District
5
Agricultural District
None Found
Henderson County
WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY,
Geographic Inbnnation Systems (GIS)
200 North Grove Street
All Information or data provided (whether subscribed purchased or otherwise distributed) is provided as is, without any
Hardemonvile, NC 26792
werrentles, Including the w&Tar&s of mendhandablity or of Mness for a partiular purpose. Henderson County and Its
P: (626) 696-5124
employees make no warranties or guarantees, either egress or implied. Use of the inforrtwtion or data subscribed,
F: (626) 6985122
purchased or otherwise distributed, whether in hard copy or digital media, shell be at the users own risk.
Henderson County. NC Tax Parcel Report Friday. February 13, 2015
Parcel Inforrnation
Parcel Number:
9906168
Pin:
9568061771
Listed to:
SUHRIE, RUTH R AKA
Neighborhood:
LAUREL PK/OLDER
P. (828) 8985124
RUTH S ALLAWAY
F. (828) 89&5122
SECT.
Mailing Address:
200 N GROVE ST
Township:
Hendersonville
Mailing City, State, Zip:
HENDERSONVILLE, NC
Municipality:
LAUREL PARK
28792
Physical Address:
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
Fire District:
Deed:
2181016
Plat:
B 301A
Date Recorded:
01112/1937
Elementary School
BRUCE DRYSDALE
District:
Revenue Stamps:
Middle School District:
HENDERSONVILLE
MIDDLE
Property Description:
Lot # PARK THE SUHRIE
High School District:
HENDERSONVILLE
SUB - DIVISION
HIGH
Map Shoot:
9568.09
Soil:
Codorus loam (arkaqua)
Assessed Acreage:
0.3400
Voting Precinct:
Laurel Park
Building Value:
$0.00
Commissioner District
5
Land Value:
$2,900.00
Agricultural District
None Found
Value To Be Billed:
$2,900.00
Henderson County
WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
North Grove 200 North Gravv e Slreal
All information or date provided (whether subscribed, purchased or otherwise distributed) Is provided as k, without any
Hendersonville, NC 28792
warranties, including the warranties of merrhenlability or of fitness for a parlkular purpose, Henderson County and Its
P. (828) 8985124
amployeas make no warranties or guarantees, either express or Implied. Use of the hdomtalion or date subscribed,
F. (828) 89&5122
purchased or otherwise distributed, whether in hard copy or diglaf meda, shalt be at the user's own risk.
V SVii®Si i AvAr•i INUL LU J1.;u1G
NOTE:
Culvert to be embedded,
into existing stream
-bad.
Sh, PothWoySh.' j
1 4" ft. 4 1�4"!�• I 9
Surface
1
Existing ..._ .�...:. --
Creek Bed Proposed ==
Culvert to be Culvert
Embedded 6-12"
Into Creek Bed
CULVERT IN STREAM
Not to Scale
RUSTIC——
oil
USTIR
NOTE:
Contractor to remove sediment
from existing lake and place
in sediment disposal area.
Proposed sediment
disposal area
W Omni
®®
-7
Impact #1
Bank Stabilization 323 LF
Impact #2
Proposed Culvert 30 LF
Stream (Un -named
tributary to Wash Creek)
— Conservation Easement
Water Level
11.....1 L. O s
Irl
Forebay
Existing overflow culvert
UA6 paired Stand Pipe and
in Pipe
drainage Swale
i�--� — I-mpact #3
®® Temporary Lake Bed
Impact Area .17 Ac
® Existing lake boundary NOTE:
Contractors equipment to stay
Boardwalk on Temporar Lake Bed Ir act
Y �
♦® Area and reach into lake bed
Impact #4 to remove sediment.
Proposed Wetland .OS Ac
Impact #9
Proposed Fill .03 Ac
l.--- Proposed lake expansion boundary
Impact #5
Proposed Culvert 20 LF
Existing Wetland (to be preserved)
Impact #B
Proposed Fill .03 Ac
i Proposed Forebay
' Impact #7
Proposed Stream 88 Lf
-- Impact #10
® Proposed Fill .08 Ac
I
f% I ® Existing lake boundary
/ J
Impact #8 .05 Ac
Fill Existing Wetland
/ Existing Stream (to be preserved)
/ Existing Diversion Pipe
Property Line
Stream (Unnamed
\ ® •�
LAKE DR>'v�-
tributary to Wash Cre
LAKE & WETLAND
RESTORATION PERMITTING
Existing
Total Open Waters: 1.10 Ac
Total Wetlands. .07 Ac
Total Stream Reach: 508 Lf
Proposed
Total Open Waters: 1.10 Ac
Wetland Impact Area: .05 Ac
Additional Stream Le-ngth: 88 Lf
Temporary Lakebed Impact Area:
Permanent Lakebed Impact Area.-
New
rea:New Wetland: .05 Ac
_111
�;•. ��_
t
Water Level
Depth 8' Stand Pipe
1.1— A A 9\ 1
Lake
FOREBAY AND LAKE DEPTH
Not to Scale
OF gA A MANDAUM I
(TY0•)
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
Not to Scale
Water Elevation
Water Depth over
shelf 9"-18" deep
10'-12' wide gently
sloping Littorial Shelf
planted with native
wetland planets.
LITTORIAL SHELF
Not to Scale
.17 Ac
.14 Ac
-1 Fll�
`y
Z
J
CC
U
O z
Z
Y
CL
J
w
ry
Q)
CAR''' ..�
•e••eeeeeee ee He``••'e
Date: Drown By:
02-13-2015 JPC
Job No: Checked By.
120627PK AHM
Revisions
LAKE &
WETLAND
RESTORATION
PERMITTING
PLAN
LA - 1
1 OF 1