20190159 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_Buffer_2022_20230215

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20190159
Version* 1
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 02/15/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 2/15/2023
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Email Address: *
Jeremiah Dow [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:*
20190159
Existing ID#
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
• DMS Mitigation Bank
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Site
Johnston
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Version:* 1
Existing Version
StrawberryHill_100094_MY1_Buffer_2022.pdf 12.32MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Jeremiah Dow
[ /4 05:49

(MYI) FINAL MONITORING REPORT — Riparian Buffer Mitization
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION PROJECT
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
NCDMS Project 9100094 (Contract 97745)
USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-00124
DWR Project 92019-0159
Provided by:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
for Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC (EBX-Neuse I)
Provided for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
February 2023

,fires
February 2, 2023
Jeremiah Dow
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 W Loop S #300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: DMS Comments on the MY1 Report Strawberry Hill, Project ID #100094, DMS Contract
7745
Listed below are comments provided by DMS on January 31, 2023 regarding the Strawberry Hill
Stream and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project Year 1 Monitoring Reports and RES' responses.
Stream Report Comments:
1. Section 1.5.2 (1st paragraph) seems to have mixed up the flow gauge location and stage recorder
location in the discussion. The stage recorder is identified as being on JH1-A and flow gauge on
JH1-B when it should be the opposite. Please correct.
This has been revised accordingly.
2. Please remove Section 1.5.4 from the stream report since it exclusively deals with the buffer -
only section of the project.
The section has been removed.
3. Recommend removing Figure 2b from the stream report.
Figure 2b was included in the report in order to satisfy a previous DMS Digital File Comment from
the MYO report (See excerpt below from the MYO Comment Response Memo):
ital File Comments:
1. It is not possible to ensure the easement is accurate when compared to the CCPV in the stream
asset baseline report, the CCPV does include the entire easement. The digital easement
submitted does represent the DMS recorded easement. A requirement of the CCPV is to
include the easement boundary, please revise the CCPV in the Stream Baseline Report to
include the entire easement boundary. It is complete in the Buffer Baseline Report.
Figure 2 has been divided into Figure 2a and 2b so that monitoring devices are legible on 2a
and the entire conservation easement is visible on 2b.
Therefore, at this time, RES prefers to include the figure per the previous comment; however, if
DMS concludes that the previous comment is erroneous, then RES can remove it in future years'
monitoring reports.
res.us

4. In Appendix A, please remove any photos from the buffer -only easement from the stream
report.
The photo pertaining to the buffer -only portion of the easement has been removed from
Appendix A.
5. On Flow Gauge JH1-A hydrograph, recommend adding number of days of flow after the date
range, i.e., 2/16/2022 - 4/4/2022 (47 days).
Number of days have been added to the hydrograph accordingly.
Buffer Report Comments:
6. Please update Section 1.3 with the correct riparian buffer restoration credits as reported in the
MYO report. The restoration credits should be 642,070.977 and total credits should be 650,162.286.
RES apologizes for the mistake. A previous version of Table 1 was accidentally copied -and -pasted
into this report. The final report has been revised to include the accurate credits and correct
version of Table 1 (also refer to comment #8 below).
7. Please remove Section 1.5. We would only expect a discussion of as -built condition in the MYO
Baseline report.
The Section has been deleted. Note that previous Section 1.6 is now Section 1.5.
8. Replace/update Table 1 in Appendix A so the correct credits are displayed
As mentioned in the above response to comment #6 above, the correct table has been included
in Appendix A of the final report.
9. The veg plot field sheets located after Table 7 do not need to be included in the report
The field sheets have been removed from Appendix B.
2

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary.................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. I
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria....................................................................1
1.3 Project Components.................................................................................................................. 2
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Monitoring Performance (MY 1)............................................................................................... 3
2 Reference................................................................................................................................................4
Annendix A: Background Tables and Site Mans
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View Map
Table 1: Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Table 2: Summary: Goals, Performance and Results
Table 3: Project Attributes
Table 4: Project Timeline and Contacts
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5: Plant Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 7: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
General Site Photos
i

1 Proiect Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Strawberry Hill Project is within the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit HUC 03020201, 14-digit
HUC 03020201140010 and DWR Sub -basin Number 03-04-02.
The Strawberry Hill Project is located in Johnston County in Smithfield, NC at the crossroads of Yelverton
Grove Road and Brogden Road (Figure 1). To access the Project from Raleigh, take I-40 East to US-70
East. Then take US-70 BUS West until taking a right onto South 31d Street in downtown Smithfield. Then
take a left onto Brogden Road. Follow Brogden Road for 2.9 miles and the downstream extent of reach
JH1-B will be on your left. The coordinates are 35.469579 °N and-78.323896 'W.
Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC (EBX-Neuse I), a wholly -owned subsidiary of Resource
Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide this Year 1 Monitoring Report as a component of the
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project (Project), a full -delivery stream and buffer mitigation project for the
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) (DMS # 100094). This buffer component of the Project is designed
to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to development within the Neuse
River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Cataloguing Unit 03020201 (Neuse 01)
(Figure 1). This Buffer Project provides mitigation in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703. The
Strawberry Hill Project also entails a stream mitigation component, generating stream mitigation credits
through stream restoration. Conditions pertaining to the stream mitigation component of this Project will
be provided in a separate baseline monitoring report.
The conservation easement of the Strawberry Hill Project totals 22.12 acres and includes two unnamed
tributaries and three ditches that drain into Polecat Branch and eventually the Neuse River. Previous land
use within the Project was primarily crop production and disturbed riparian forest. The Project area was
used extensively for agricultural and forestry purposes for over 80 years. Land use adjacent to and
surrounding the Project is either crop production or forest regeneration. Water quality stressors affecting
the Project include pollution from crop production and lack of forested riparian buffer. Previous buffer
conditions demonstrated significant degradation with the loss of stabilizing vegetation because of continued
crop production and recent clear cut of adjacent riparian forest.
The goal of the buffer component of the Project is to restore and preserve ecological function to the existing
streams and their associated riparian buffer areas by establishing appropriate plant communities while
minimizing temporal and land disturbing impacts. Buffer and surrounding riparian area improvements will
filter runoff from agricultural fields, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to Project channels and
provide water quality benefit to the overall watershed. Project attributes are summarized in Table 1.
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments are being conducted. Riparian vegetation monitoring
is based on the "Carolina Vegetation Survey -Ecosystem Enhancement Program Protocol for Recording
Vegetation: Level 2 Plot Sampling Only Version 42". Monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100
meters squared in size and cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area. These plots were
randomly placed throughout the planted riparian buffer mitigation area (15.13 acres) and are representative
of the riparian restoration conditions. The following data is recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height,
planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots are flagged with flagging tape. Data is
processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked
with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the
origin each monitoring year. There are 13 fixed vegetation monitoring plots (Figure 2).
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 1 MY I Monitoring Report — Riparian Buffer
Project 9100094 February 2023

Photos are being taken at all vegetation plot origins each monitoring year and be provided in the annual
reports. Visual inspections and photos are taken to ensure that areas are being maintained and compliant.
The measures of vegetative success for the Project are the survival of at least four native hardwood tree
species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of stems, at a density of at least 260 stems per acre
at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards as
determined by NC Division of Water Resources (DWR).
A visual assessment of the conservation easement is also performed each year to confirm:
• Easement boundary markers/signage are in good condition throughout the site;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• No invasive species in areas were invasive species were treated,
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement areas; and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
Component/ Monitoring Maintenance through project close-out
Feature
Vegetation Annual Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted plant
vegetation community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include
monitoring supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species
shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation requiring
herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. Vegetation maintenance activities will be
documented and reported in annual monitoring reports. Vegetation maintenance will
continue through the monitoring period.
Invasive and Nuisance Visual Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become
Vegetation Assessment dominant or alter the desired community structure of the Project. Locations of invasive
and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
Project Boundary Visual Project boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
Assessment mitigation project and adjacent properties. Boundaries are marked with signs identifying
the property as a mitigation project and will include the name of the long-term steward
and a contact number. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -
blazing, or other means as allowed by Project conditions and/or conservation easement.
Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on
an as -needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/ signage maintenance will
continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
Road Crossing Visual Road crossings within the Project may be maintained only as allowed by conservation
Assessment easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way, or corridor agreements.
Crossings in easement breaks are the responsibility of the landowner to maintain.
1.3 Project Components
This Project generates 642,070.977 riparian buffer restoration credits on pre-existing non -forested land, and
8,091.309 buffer preservation credits. The total area of riparian preservation is less than 25 percent of the
total area of riparian buffer mitigation in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5). The total riparian
buffer mitigation credits that the Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project generate are summarized below, but
the detailed Project credit breakdown, including buffer credits that are convertible to nutrient offset credit,
utilizing the DWR "Project Credit Table Template (Updated February 2022)," is provided in Table 1;
Appendix A.
Mitigation Totals Area Square Feet Credits
Restoration 652,991 642,070.977
Preservation 81.431 8.091.309
Total Riparian Buffer 734,422 650,162.286
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 2 MY 1 Monitoring Report — Riparian Buffer
Project 9100094 February 2023

1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach
The buffer mitigation is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295
and Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703. In addition to traditional riparian
restoration, the Project also incorporates the alternative buffer mitigation options: Preservation of Buffers
on Subject Streams, as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (5), and Restoration and Enhancement of
Ditches, as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (8).
Riparian restoration along the Project streams and ditches is accomplished through the planting,
establishment, and protection of a hardwood forest community. Restoration activities included planting a
composition of native bare -root tree species along streams and ditches based on reference data. The result
will be a riparian area that functions to mitigate nutrient and sediment inputs from the surrounding uplands.
Preservation occurs in some areas along Reach JH1-A and JH1-B. Some of these preservation areas were
associated with stream restoration under the stream mitigation component of the Project; therefore, some
of the areas were cleared during construction of the new stream corridor. However, these impacted areas
were planted under the same criteria as restoration areas.
1.5 Monitoring Performance (MYI)
Year 1 monitoring of 13 fixed vegetation plots was completed on November 16t1', 2022. Vegetation tables
are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MY monitoring data indicates that all plots
are exceeding the success criteria of 260 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 324 to
809 planted stems per acre with a mean of 563 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 12 species
were documented within the plots. One volunteer species (Sambucus canadensis, or common elderberry)
was noted in one of the vegetation plots, while more volunteers are expected to establish in upcoming years.
The average tree height observed was 1.5 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project and no invasive species were observed. Easement
boundary markers and signs are clearly visible and in good condition. However, there was some
encroachment observed. RES identified some encroachment associated with ditches JH2 and JH3 along
Stevens Sausage Road. One encroachment involves a path being actively driven parallel to ditch JH2 and
is impeding vegetation growth. RES will be installing additional t-post markers along with horse tape to
provide a physical barrier to prevent future encroachment here and will also be replanting the driving path
footprint with containerized trees to ensure adequate tree density and vigor. The other encroachment
involves two easement corners, on JH2 and JH3, that are being driven through by farm equipment as the
farmer is attempting to access the adjacent cropland. RES is actively resolving the issue with the landowner
and farmer and will also be coordinating the relocation of a roadside ditch crossing that will enable the farm
equipment to access the fields at another location, away from the easement. All activities and resulting
outcomes will be communicated in the next (MY2) monitoring report. Locations of encroachment areas are
depicted in Appendix A, Figure 2 and some photos of encroachment and other general site photos are in
Appendix C. Additionally, there is no undocumented concentrated flow in the easement area.
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 3 MY 1 Monitoring Report — Riparian Buffer
Project 9100094 February 2023

2 Reference
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2020. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0714 — Neuse River Basin:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Protection and Maintenance of Existing
Riparian Buffers.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (2020). Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project — Final Mitigation
Plan — Appendix A — Final Buffer Mitigation Plan.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 4 MY 1 Monitoring Report — Riparian Buffer
Project 9100094 February 2023

Appendix A
Proj ect Background Tables and Site Maps

A
100
�a
se
0
QGreen Chapel Missionary o "
Baptist Church
Brpy n
z—
Qom
Stevens Sausage Co., Inc
,
0
t
m
d
CeseY tid
MONO.
2--
111111110
Durham
0
0
apel Hill Raleigh
o
Br A
ogyM Rd a
Cnrnmul
KD's Carts19
zsoe
Project Coordintates:
35.469579,-78.323896
®CI
Wilso
Le
Strawberry HillLT
Proposed Easement Mitigation Project
CO^
Neuse River Basin - 03020201 (Excluding Falls Lake Watershed) ►'l
Fayetteville
" Figure 1 - Site Location Date: 3/24/2022
w - e Strawberry Hill Drawn by: MDD res
S Mitigation Project Checked by: JRM
0 500 1.000
Feet Johnston County, North Carolina 1 inch = 1,000 feet

0
•0 C C m p 0 0 V Y
z o To o U N N N m
O N 0 C U O O O N N LL d
M.
o
N C O R O O O O
LL C N L d d din d d p
K O1 Q a K K K O K K ON Z¢¢ vt
Q > ■ cc 0 0 ■ ■ ■ E
• w
I a• �
l `
0
4
0
c
m
E
e c
E Q
E g
`o $
v E, o
G F a Z
V
o a �
� ¢ a
sanadg anIsenuI

!�
n
-
`
c;
11;
u _0
\
737a0
z
``|
2-
,
.2WE.2
�)§@§JR
kK)

Table 2: Summarv: Goals. Performance and Results
Goal
Objective/Treatment
Likely Functional
U lift
performance Criteria
Measurement
Cumulative Monitoring
Results
Survival of at least
Reduction in floodplain
four native hardwood
Established and increased forested riparian
sediment inputs from
tree species, where no
Restore and preserve native floodplain and
buffers to 50 feet and greater along both sides of
runoff, increased bank
one species is greater
streambank vegetation.
the channel along the project reaches with a
stability, increased LWD
than 50 percent of
13 fixed vegetation plots
13/13 passed - MY1
hardwood riparian plant community;
and organic material in
stems, at a density of
streams,
at least 260 stems per
increased
acre at the end of Year
5.

Table 3. Project Attributes
Project Name
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project
County
Johnston
Project Area (acres)
22.12
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.469579,-78.323896
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
19.73
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
65m - Rolling Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03020201140010
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
383 ac 0.60 mil
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
2%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Bottomland Forest, Cultivated, Evergreen Shrubland, Southern Yellow
Pine, Unconsolidated Sediment

Table 4. Proiect Timeline and Contacts
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Task Completion or
Deliverable Submission
Project Institute
NA
Dec-20
Mitigation Plan Approve
NA
Nov-20
Construction (Grading) Completed
NA
20-Jan-22
Planting Completed
NA
07-Mar-22
As -built Survey Completed
NA
May-22
MY-0 Baseline Report
Mar-22
Ma -22
Encroachment
Areas noted in Nov-22. Hunting driving path continued use and farm equipment cutting
corners.RES is actively resolving.
MY1+ Monitoring Reports
Nov-22
Jan-23
Remediation Items (e.g. beaver removal, supplements, repairs etc.)
Strawberry Hill #100094
Provider
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC
27612
Mitigation Provider POC
Jamey Mceachran [phone]
Designer
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC
27612
Primary project design POC
Ben Carroll, PE [phone]
Construction Contractor
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC
7612
[acy
Construction contractor POC
Kirkpatrick

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5. Strawberry Hill Riparian Buffer Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Species
%
Zone 1
%
Zone 2
Total
Planted Amount
River birch
Betula ni ra
10
10
1,600
Buttonbush
Ce halanthus occidentalis
5
5
800
Yellow poplar
Liriodendron tuli i era
10
10
1,600
Wax Myrtle
Morella ceri era
5
10
1,000
Swamp tupelo
N ssa bi ora
5
5
800
Americansycamore
Platanus occidentalis
10
10
1,600
Laurel oak
Quercus lauri olia
5
10
1,000
Overcup oak
Quercus l rata
10
10
1,600
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
10
10
1,600
Water oak
Quercus ni ra
10
10
1,600
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
10
10
1,600
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
10
L 0
1,000
TOTAL
15,800
Table 6. Strawberry Hill Riparian Buffer Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted
Stem
Height
1
607
0
607
Yes
1.3
2
567
81
647
Yes
1.7
3
607
0
607
Yes
1.4
4
647
0
647
Yes
1.5
5
809
0
809
Yes
1.3
6
567
0
567
Yes
1.4
7
526
0
526
Yes
1.3
8
445
0
445
Yes
1.2
9
728
0
728
Yes
1.6
10
647
0
647
Yes
1.6
11
324
0
324
Yes
1.5
12
486
0
486
Yes
1.6
13
364
0
364
Yes
2.0
Project Avg
563
6
570
Yes
1.5

$
'
r
�a
o
=
I
T
o
o
e
a
o
o
r
�
~
d
o
o
c~ a
g
o
r
p
a
o
~
$
r
a N
N
a
'
a N
i
�
a N
o
~
a
g
o
r
�
N
�
N
m
i
°
o
N O
C
�
S
a
N
8
r
l0
N
ri
C
l0
I�
a o
~
e
�
a
u o
o
r
M
i
o
O
o
~
c
a
ro m
o
�o
o
r
�
0
~
0
a
�
or
`O
o
`O
o
i
o
0
~
0
a
�
g
o
r
�
'
C
I7
r
O77a
c
a
77
n
o
~
n
O
n
$
r
o
i
�
o
^
o
0
~
0
a
�
m
E a< y a
a
am£
o
o
m
o
a
Z
o
o
`m o
u
a
`o
a E
a E
n E
= 3
�_
E
o¢-
o
o 2-
o
r
0
E a
o 3
Y Z
3
o a
.3 a-
a
a
£
Z
°
°
E
`
a_o
o
a`o
- o-
m
2
u -
E
oo
-
-
E
- Q
m u
o o
N
z a
U� U�
U� U�
E
'o
n ro
c �o
N o
c
o
N
w m
n ro
c �o
N o
c
o
O
y i
� O
g in
w m
n ro
c �o
N o
c
o�
as
y i
M
O
N
N C
d
o
m
�
o
n a
0
n �
p
N
C
a
g
cc
o
n
o e
r
o m y o
m
E a< y a
a
o
o
o
Z
tj
o m
_
£_
=
= o
a r
¢
Y o
o
= �
a
o
o 2'
o
a
y
a T
n E
u
2
E
u°
�
.�. o
¢-°
0
3 3
3 a
0
Z
a
o
-
o
o
-
m
uw
n
o o
'a^
z a
`a `a
U� U%
`a `a
U� U�
a
U� ,n
o

Appendix C
Photos

i
i
1-2

i
OM-

i

Vegetation Plot 13 (11/16/2022)

Strawberry Hill General Site Buffer Photos (MY1)
Vegetation along JH1-A (11/16/2022)
JH1-A looking upstream (11/16/2022)
Vegetation along JH1-B (11/16/2022)
JH1-B looking downstream (11/16/2022)

E
N