20141328 Ver 1_ThomasCreek_96074_MY7_2022_20230213

Thomas Creek Restoration Project
Year 7 Monitoring/Closeout Report
Wake County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID Number — 96074, DEQ Contract No. 5549
Permits: SAW-2013-02009, DWR# 14-1328
Cape Fear River Basin: 03030004-020010
Project Info: Monitoring Year: 7 of 7
Year of Data Collection: 2022
Year of Completed Construction (including planting): 2016
Submission Date: February 2023
Submitted To: NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services
1625 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
NC DEQ Contract ID No. 003992

Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L
February 10, 2023
Jeremiah Dow, Project Manager
NCDEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
8000 Regency Parkway, Ste. 600 1 Cary, North Carolina 27518
Office: 919.463.5488 1 Fax: [phone]
Subject: Response to DMS Comments for DRAFT Monitoring Year 7/Closeout Report
Thomas Creek Restoration Project, Wake County
DMS Project # 96074, DEQ Contract #5549, RFP# 16-005020
Mr. Dow:
Please find below our responses to the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) review comments received
January 24, 2023 in reference to the Thomas Creek Restoration Project —DRAFT Monitoring Year 7/Closeout
Report. We have revised the Draft document in response to the referenced review comments as outlined
below:
1) This project is subject to the 10 ft. height requirement performance standard at Year 7. Please include
vegetation plot height data if available.
Response: Vegetation plot height data has been add to table 8 as requested.
2) Please check the date on the R2 bank scour photos. The left photos show a 2022 date, but it appears
that the left and right photos are intended to show the scour before and after repair.
Response: Revisions have been made as requested.
3) Cross Section 6 appears as though the channel is slightly smaller than the AB channel, but has a BHR
of 1.1 when it looks like it should be <1. Table 11a shows a BHR <1. Please correct the cross section
or Table as applicable.
Response: Revision has been made as request.
Baker has provided one hardcopy and a pdf copy of the Final report, along with all the updated digital files (to
be sent by secure ftp link). Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions regarding our
response submittal.
Sincerely,
Andrew Powers
Project Manager

Thomas Creek Restoration Project
Year 7 Monitoring/Closeout Report
Wake County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID Number — 96074, DEQ Contract No. 5549
Permits: SAW-2013-02009, DWR4 14-1328
Cape Fear River Basin: 03030004-020010
Report Prepared and Submitted by Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
NC Professional Engineering License 4 F-1084
I N T E R N AT 1 0 N A L
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. i
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96074
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7 (2022)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................I
2.0 METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................3
2.1 Stream Assessment....................................................................................................................................... 3
2.1.1 Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability.....................................................................................3
2.1.2 Hydrology..................................................................................................................................................4
2.1.3 Photographic Documentation....................................................................................................................4
2.1.4 Visual Stream Morphological Stability Assessment..................................................................................4
2.2 Vegetation Assessment................................................................................................................................4
3.0 REFERENCES...............................................................................................5
APPENDICES
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Figure 2 Restoration Summary Map
Figure
3
Reference Stream Locations Map
Figure
4
Monitoring Features Overview Map
Table
1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table
2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table
3
Project Contacts
Table
4
Project Attributes (Pre -Construction Conditions)
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 5 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Maps
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 Vegetation Conditions Assessment
Stream Station Photo -Points
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Crest Gauge Photographs
Additional Monitoring Photographs
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 CVS Density Per Plot
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Summary Information
Table 9 Total Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96074
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7 (2022)

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Figure
6
Year 7 Cross -Sections
Figure
7
Pebble Count Plot Data
Table
10
Baseline Stream Summary
Table
1 la
Cross-section Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring
Summary
Table
1lb
Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Figure 8 Flow Gauge Graphs
Figure 9 Observed Rainfall Versus Historic Averages
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 13 Flow Gauge Success
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96074
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7 (2022)

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) restored 4,721 linear feet of perennial and intermittent stream and
enhanced 3,948 linear feet of intermittent stream as documented in the As -built Baseline Report. Baker also
planted approximately 14.4 acres of native riparian vegetation within the 22.7 acre recorded conservation
easement areas along all or portions of the restored and enhanced reaches (Reaches RI, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6,
R7, T1, and T2). The Thomas Creek Restoration Project (Site) is located in Wake County, North Carolina
(Figure 1), approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the Community of New Hill. (Figure 1). The Site is located
within the NC Division of Mitigation Services' (NCDMS) Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 03030004-020010
(the Harris Lake Hydrologic Unit) of the Cape Fear River Basin and is located in what was formerly known as
the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) subbasin 03-06-07. The project involved the restoration and
enhancement of a rural Piedmont stream system, which had been impaired due to past agricultural conversion
and cattle grazing.
Based on the NCDMS 2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priority (RBRP) Plan, the Thomas Creek
Restoration Project area is located in an existing targeted local watershed within the Cape Fear River Basin and
is located within the Middle Cape Fear / Kenneth and Parker Creeks, Local Watershed Planning (LWP) area.
The restoration strategy for the Cape Fear River Basin is to promote low impact development, stormwater
management, restoration and buffer protection in urbanizing areas, and buffer preservation elsewhere.
The primary goal of the project was to improve ecologic functions through the restoration and enhancement of
streams and buffers in a degraded, urbanizing area as described in the NCDMS 2009 Cape Fear RBRP. Detailed
project goals are identified below:
• Create geomorphically stable conditions along the unnamed tributaries throughout the Site,
• Protect and improve water quality by reducing streambank erosion, and nutrient/sediment inputs,
• Restore stream and floodplain interaction by connecting historic flow paths and promoting natural flood
processes,
• Restore and protect riparian buffer functions and corridor habitat in perpetuity by establishing a
permanent conservation easement, and
• Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat through improved substrate and in -stream cover, addition of
woody debris, and reduction of water temperature.
To accomplish these goals, the following objectives were identified:
• Restore existing incised, eroding, and channelized streams by providing them access to their relic
floodplains,
• Implement agricultural BMPs, including cattle watering stations, to reduce nonpoint source (NPS)
inputs to receiving waters,
• Prevent cattle from accessing the conservation easement by installing permanent fencing and thus
reduce excessive streambank erosion and undesired nutrient inputs,
• Enhance aquatic habitat value by providing more bedform diversity, creating natural scour pools and
reducing sediment from accelerated streambank erosion,
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96074
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7 (2022)

Plant native species riparian buffer vegetation along streambank and floodplain areas, protected by a
permanent conservation easement, to increase stormwater runoff filtering capacity, improve
streambank stability and riparian habitat connectivity, and shade the stream to decrease water
temperature, and
Control invasive species vegetation within much of the project area and, if necessary, continue
treatments during the monitoring period.
The Year 7 visual inspection monitoring showed all stream reaches appear stable and functioning. All stream
riffle beds are vertically stable, pools are maintaining depth, stream banks are stable and vegetating, and in -
stream structures are physically intact and performing as designed as reported in Table 5 (Appendix B). No
Stream Problem Areas (SPAS) were identified in Year 7. The two short sections of minor bank scour from
Hurricane Florence that were reported, repaired, and replanted in Year 4 (2019) monitoring report appear fully
stable with vegetation continuing to establish well (see photos in Appendix B).
The Year 7 visual inspection monitoring also observed that the planted acreage performance categories were
functioning at 100 percent with no eroding or bare areas to report, nor any areas of high mortality or poor growth
as reported in Table 6 (Appendix B). No Vegetation Problem Areas (VPAs) were identified in Year 7. Baker
continued to spread soil amendments in June 2022 to the left floodplain on R3 to help herbaceous vegetation
establish. Compared to previous monitoring years this area is improving and shows to be stable. This area can
be found in the CCPV in Appendix B. Additionally, there were no significant areas of invasive species
vegetation observed during the Year 7 monitoring. There were a few small, isolated pockets of cattail (Typha
latifolia) found along sections of Reach R2. Also, small pockets of Privet (Ligustrum japonicum) on R2 and
T1. Spot treatment was conducted in areas necessary. Four of the sixteen vegetation plots did not meet the
average 10 foot height requirement by year 7. However, these areas met the stem density requirement but due
to tough dry soils and shade in certain areas the trees didn't grow as fast as anticipated. The average heights can
be found on Table 8 in Appendix C.
Year 7 flow monitoring demonstrated that both flow gauges (TMCK-FL1 and TMCK-FL2) met the stated
success criteria of 30 days or more of consecutive flow through Reaches 2 and 5 respectively. Flow gauge
TMCK-FL1 documented 271 days of consecutive flow in Reach 2, while flow gauge TMCK-FL2 documented
166 days of consecutive flow in Reach 5. The flow gauges demonstrated similar patterns relative to rainfall
events and can corroborate reported bankfull events from the crest gauge, as shown in the flow gauge graphs in
Appendix E.
As the observed monthly rainfall data for the project presented in Figure 9 in Appendix E demonstrates, the
past 12 months have been dryer as compared to historic averages for Wake County. A total of 24.8 inches of
rainfall was observed for the project using the nearest NC-CRONOS station, while Wake County averages 44.5
inches of annual rainfall. The bulk of this excess rainfall came over the winter of 2021-2022, while the summer
and fall of 2022 was well below average monthly.
During Year 7 monitoring, the Reach R2 crest gauge (crest gauge #1) documented one post -construction
bankfull event in January 2022, as confirmed by both in -stream flow gauges (see Appendix E). As bankfull
events have now been documented in all seven years of monitoring, the project has exceeded the bankfull
standard required for credit release.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96074
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7 (2022)

In summation, the past seven monitoring years have demonstrated that the Thomas Creek Restoration Project
has met the performance standards and success criteria for vegetation, stream flow, and channel stability. The
vegetation plot data shows that over the seven years there has been overall consistent vegetation density, height,
and vigor throughout the site. The only areas of concern noted during the monitoring phase were over a
relatively small portion of the total project buffer and have been successfully ameliorated. The as -built stem
density averages 728 stems/acre and after seven years the stem density averages 549 stems/acre. This meets the
closeout success criteria and demonstrates that the site has established good vegetation within its riparian buffer.
The stream flow gauges on R2 and R5 have demonstrated substantial seasonal flow throughout the monitoring
phase. Finally, the cross -sections throughout the seven monitoring years show channel stability with little to
erosion or aggradation, with all their final morphological parameters within an appropriate range. Additional
photographs have been provided in Appendix B to show a comparison of a few historic and current photos of
the site.
Summary information/data related to the Site and statistics related to performance of various project and
monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report Appendices. Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report and in
the Mitigation Plan available on the DMS website. Any raw data supporting the tables and figures in the
Appendices is available from DMS upon request.
This report documents the successful completion of the Year 7 monitoring activities for the post -construction
monitoring period.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The seven-year monitoring plan for the Site includes criteria to evaluate the success of the stream and vegetation
components of the Site. The methodology and report template used to evaluate these components adheres to
the DMS guidance documents Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland
Mitigation (DMS 2011), and to the Monitoring Report Template, Version 1.5 (DMS 2012).
The specific locations of monitoring features, such as vegetation plots, permanent cross -sections, reference
photograph stations, crest gauges and flow gauges, are shown on the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
map found in Appendix B.
All earthwork for project construction was completed in October of 2015, with subsequent as -built survey work
completed in November of 2015. All site planting (bareroot stems and live -stakes) was completed in January
of 2016. The Year 7 visual site assessment data contained in Appendix B were obtained throughout the year
from field visits in March, July, September, and October 2022.
2.1 Stream Assessment
The Project involved the restoration and enhancement of a rural Piedmont stream system that had been impaired
due to past agricultural conversion and cattle grazing. Restoration practices involved raising the existing
streambed and reconnecting the stream to the relic floodplain to restore natural flood regimes to the system.
The existing channels abandoned within the restoration areas were partially to completely filled to decrease
surface and subsurface drainage and to raise the local water table. Permanent cattle exclusion fencing was
provided around all proposed reaches and riparian buffers, except along reaches where no cattle are located or
cattle lack stream access.
2.1.1 Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
A longitudinal profile was surveyed for the entire length of channel immediately after construction to
document as -built baseline conditions for the Monitoring Year 0 only. Annual longitudinal profiles
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96074
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7 (2022)

will not be conducted during subsequent monitoring years unless channel instability has been
documented or remedial actions/repairs are required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
or DMS.
Cross-section survey data were collected for this Monitoring Year 7 assessment. Consequently, all the
cross -sectional survey graphs (Figure 6), morphology data (Tables 1 la and 1 lb), and pebble count data
(Figure 7) are presented in Appendix D as in previous monitoring reports.
2.1.2 Hydrology
To monitor on -site bankfull events, one crest gauge (crest gauge 91) was installed along the downstream
portion of Reach R2 at bankfull elevation along the left top of bank at approximately Station 38+90.
During Year 7 monitoring, one above-bankfull event was documented in January 2022. Further details
of the crest gauge readings are presented in Table 12 in Appendix E.
To monitor flow on restored reaches, two flow gauges were installed on site; TMCK-FL1 on Reach 2
(Station 20+75), and TMCK-FL2 on Reach 5 (Station 33+90). The Year 7 flow monitoring data
demonstrated that both flow gauges met the stated success criteria of 30 days or more of consecutive
flow.
2.1.3 Photographic Documentation
Representative stream photographs for Monitoring Year 7 were taken along each Reach in March 2022
and are provided in Appendix B. Additional photographs were taken at other times during the year as
noted in the photologs.
2.1.4 Visual Stream Morphological Stability Assessment
The visual stream morphological stability assessment involves the qualitative evaluation of lateral and
vertical channel stability, and the integrity and overall performance of in -stream structures throughout
the Project reaches as a whole. Habitat parameters and pool depth maintenance are also evaluated.
During Year 7 monitoring, Baker staff walked the entire length of each of the Project reaches several
times throughout the year, noting geomorphic conditions of the stream bed profile (riffle/pool facets),
both stream banks, and engineered in -stream structures. Representative photographs were taken per
the Site's Mitigation Plan, and the locations of any SPAS were documented in the field for subsequent
mapping on the CCPV figures. There were no SPAS noted during Year 7 monitoring. A more detailed
summary of the results for the visual stream stability assessment can be found in Appendix B, which
includes supporting data tables and figures, as well as the general stream photos.
2.2 Vegetation Assessment
In order to determine if the success criteria were achieved, vegetation -monitoring quadrants were installed and
are monitored across the site in accordance with the CVS-DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.1
(Lee 2007) using the CVS-DMS Data Entry Tool v. 2.3.1 (CVS 2012). The vegetation monitoring plots cover
a minimum of 2 percent of the planted portion of the Site with sixteen plots established randomly within the
planted riparian buffer areas per Monitoring Levels 1 and 2. The sizes of individual quadrants are 100 square
meters for woody tree species.
Vegetation plot monitoring conducted for the Year 7 monitoring effort are included in Appendix C as in
previous monitoring reports.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96074
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7 (2022)

3.0 REFERENCES
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) and NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). CVS-DMS
Data Entry Tool v. 2.3.1. University of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC. 2012.
Lee, M., Peet R., Roberts, S., Wentworth, T. 2007. CVS-DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.1.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2012. NCDMS Monitoring Report Template,
Version 1.5, June 8, 2012.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2011. NCDMS Monitoring Requirements and
Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation. November 7, 2011.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities.
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildlands Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, CO.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 5
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96074
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7 (2022)

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is encompassed by a recorded
conservation easement, but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may require traversing areas near or along the easement
boundary and therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their
defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activities requires prior coordination
with DMS.
N
Jordan
5
CHATW,
COUJVT
Site Directions
To access the Site from Raleigh, take US-1 south
and head south towards Sanford, for approximately
12 miles. Take the ramp for Exit 89 to New
Hill/Jordan Lake. At the end of the ramp turn right
on New Hill -Holleman Road and continue for 0.8
miles to the stop sign at Old US Highway 1. Turn
left on Old US Highway 1 and continue 1.1 miles
before turning left on Shearon Harris Rd (SR1134).
The destination will be on the right in 0.4 miles.
Turn right onto the gravel road and continue to the
end to park among the most southern farm
buildings.
Note: Site is located within targeted local
watershed 03030004020010.
Wake County
1
Project Location
It
S _ f r T
Figure 1 - Project Vicinity Map
Thomas Creek Site
DMS Project ID No. 96074
NCDEQ - N
Division of
Mitigation Services
I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L
0 0.5 1 2 3
Miles

i
A Reference Stream Locations
Upper Reach R4
C bMVT- HA
C O b�l�l Ti Y
Little Beaver Cr.
)IKW
C 64
Michael Baker NCDEQ -
Division of
N T E R N ,A T 1 Q N A L Mitigation Services
Project Location
1
Holly Springs
N Figure 3
0 0.5 1 Reference Stream
Miles A Locations Map
Thomas Creek Site

Conservation Easement
0
Veg Plot Locations
Cross Sections
Crest Gauge
®
Flow Gauge
Pebble Count Locations
Photo -Points
n V16
Reach R6
(upstream)
Reach R6
(downstream)
r
(upstream)
F i
t
:■ V7 0 i. X6 r.
Reach R5
`X7
y
(upstream)
V$
.� X$
Reach T1
Reach R7
�
V14 -%
(upstream)
Reach R2
° :
Reach R7 X15 IT V9
X14
(downstream)
(downstream) . t
Y. �� 0 X10.X9
V13
#2 #1#
[- -
Reach R5 ❑a V10
ti
(downstream)
X16�
'
V120
y
A
`
X11 V11
!X12
z p Reach R1
Figure 4
Michael Baker
0 250 500
Monitoring Features
Feet
Overview Map
INTERNATI
0NAL
Thomas Creek Site

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Miti ation Credits
Stream (SMUs)
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen Nutrient Offset
Phosphorus
Nutrient Offset
Type
R, EL EII
Totals
5,706.733
Project Components
Project Component or Reach ID
As -Built Stationing) Location
Existing Footage/
Acreage (LF)
Approach
Restoration/ Restoration
Equivalent (SMU) from
Mitigation Plan*
Design Reach Length
(LF) from Mitigation
Plan**
As -Built
Restoration
Footage (LF)
Mitigation
Ratio
Reach 1
42+01 to 44+99
397
Restoration
266.000
266
298
1:1
Reach 2 (downstream)t
27+78 to 42+01
1,238
Restoration (PI)
1,384.000
1,384
1,423
1:1
Reach 2 (upstream)t
20+55 to 27+58 (at CE Break)
757
Restoration (PII)
703.000
703
703
1:1
Reach 3 (downstream)
11+17 to 18+70 / CE Break / 18+94 to 20+55
937
Restoration
929.000
929
914
1:1
Reach 3 (upstream)
10+00 to 11+17
130
Enhancement II
26.000
130
117
5:1
Reach 4 (downstream)
10+41 to 13+83
327
Restoration
361.000
361
342
1:1
Reach 4 (upstream)
00+99 to 09+95
870
Enhancement II
87.000
870
896
10:1
Reach 5 (downstream)
29+30 to 34+97 / CE Break / 35+17 to 39+91
883
Restoration
1,044.000
1,044
1,041
1:1
Reach 5 (upstream)
28+02 to 29+30
137
Enhancement II
27.400
137
128
5:1
Reach 6 (downstream)
12+10 to 15+55 / CE Break / 15+81 to 28+02
1,592
Enhancement II
319.600
1,598
1,566
5:1
Reach 6 (upstream)
10+00 to 12+10
210
Enhancement I
140.000
210
210
1.5:1
Reach 7 (downstream)
13+60 to 16+47
287
Enhancement II
57.200
286
287
5:1
Reach 7 (upstream)
10+00 to 13+60
360
Enhancement II
144.000
360
360
2.5:1
Reach Tl
10+00 to 10+55 / CE Break / 10+75 to 12+47
242
Enhancement I
155.333
233
227
1.5:1
Reach T2
10+00 to 11+57
171
Enhancement II
1 63.200
1 158
1 157
2.5:1
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream (LF)
Riparian Wetland (AC)
Non -riparian Wetland (AC)
Buffer (SF)
Upland (AC)
Restoration
4,721
Enhancement
437
Enhancement II
3,511
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
BMP Elements: BR= Bioretention Cell; SF— Sand Filter; SW= Stormwater Wetland; WDP= Wet Detention Pond; DDP= Dry Detention
Pond; FS= Filter Strip; S= Grassed Swale; LS= Level Spreader; NI=Natural Infiltration Area
Notes:
t Starting in MY2, Reach 2 was broken up into an upstream and downstream component based on restoration approach as per DMS request. None of the actual restored lengths have changed, although the
credits for R2 (downstream) were adjusted as explained below.
* Starting in MY2, the SMU credit numbers used for these reaches were taken directly from the mitigation plan credit table (Table 5.1) as per DMS/IRT instruction, and vary from those presented in the baseline
and MY monitoring reports. This was done because credits were originally calculated along the as -built thalweg but have been updated to be calculated along stream centerlines for MY2 onward after
discussions with the IRT stemming from the April 3, 2017 Credit Release Meeting. Stationing and Restoration Footage numbers reported herein and on all subsequent monitoring reports will remain as reported
from the as -built survey. AsReach R2 was not originally subdivided, the credits were reduced from the downstream section where the bulk of differences are expected to have occurred, though the total
combined credits equal the original value for R2 as found in the approved mitigation plan.
** Starting in MY3, as per DMS/IRT instruction, this column was added to the table showing the design reach lengths taken from the mitigation plan (Table ESA). Please note that some of the numbers
presented here vary slightly from the mit plan as they originally did not remove non -creditable sections such as easement breaks for crossings from their calculations.
The numbers presented here have those non-crediable sections removed.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Elapsed Time Since Grading Completed in Oct. 2015
6 Years, 1 Month
Elapsed Time Since Planting Completed in Jan. 2016
5 Years, 10 Months
Number of Reporting Years'
6
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan Prepared
N/A
Oct-14
Mitigation Plan Amended
N/A
Mar-15
Mitigation Plan Approved
N/A
Mar-15
Final Design — (at least 90% complete)
N/A
Mar-15
Construction Begins
N/A
Apr-15
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area
N/A
Oct-15
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
N/A
Oct-15
Planting of live stakes
N/A
Jan-16
Planting of bare root trees
N/A
Jan-16
End of Construction
N/A
Oct-15
Survey of As -built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring -baseline)
Nov-15
Nov-15
Baseline Monitoring Report
Mar-16
Oct-16
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov-16
Jan-17
Stream structure and bank repairs made to Reach Rl
Repairs made in July 2016
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct-17 I Nov-17
Livestakes re -planted along sections of lower Reach R2
Planted in January 2017
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov-18 I Dec-18
Bank scour repair on 3 sections of Reach R2
Repairs made in March 2018
Supplemental planting (1-gal.) on R3
Planted in March 2018
Year 4 Monitoring
Oct-19 Jan-20
Bank scour repair on 2 sections of Reach R2
January 2019
Supplemental planting (bareroots) on Reach Tl
Planted in January 2019
Cattail treated on sections of R2 and R4
Treated in March and April 2019
Soil amendments on Reach R3
March and September 2019
Year 5 Monitoring
Oct-20 I Jan-21
Soil amendments on Reach R3
May and October 2020
Year 6 Monitoring
Oct-21 Dec-21 (Final)
Soil amendments on Reach R3
April 2021
Year 7 Monitoring
Sep-22
Dec-22
Soil amendments on Reach R3
Jun-22
The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 3. Project Contacts
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 95729
Designer
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Katie McKeithan, Telephone: [phone]
Construction Contractor
5616 Coble Church Rd
KBS Earthworks
Julian, NC 27283
Contact:
Chris Sizemore, Telephone: [phone]
Planting Contractor Amr
5616 Coble Church Rd
KBS Earthworks
Julian, NC 27283
Contact:
Chris Sizemore, Telephone: [phone]
Seeding Contractor
5616 Coble Church Rd
KBS Earthworks
Julian, NC 27283
Contact:
Chris Sizemore, Telephone: [phone]
Seed Mix Source
Green Resources, Telephone: [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Mellow Marsh Farm, Telephone: [phone]
ArborGen, Telephone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Stream Monitoring Point of Contact
Drew Powers, Telephone [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring Point of Contact
Drew Powers, Telephone [phone]
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 4. Project Attributes (Pre -Construction Conditions)
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No. ID 96074
Project Information
Project Name
Thomas Creek Restoration Project
County
Wake
Project Area (acres)
22.7
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.660521 N,-79.954475 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit and 14-digit
03030004 / 03030004020010
NCDWR Sub -basin
03-06-07
Project Drainage Area (acres)
246 (Reach R1 main stem at downstream extent)
Project Drainage Area Percent Impervious
<1%
CGIA / NCEEP Land Use Classification
2.01.01.01, 2.03.01, 2.99.01, 3.02 / Forest (66%) Agriculture
(19%) Impervious Cover (1%)
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach Rl
Reach R2
Reach R3
Reach R4
Reach R5
Length of Reach (linear feet)
397
1,995
1,067
342
1,020
Valley Classification (Rosgen)
VII
VII
VII
VII
VII
Drainage Area (acres)
246
176
62
36
62
NCDWR Stream Identification Score
37.5
38
25 / 37
31
31 / 34
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C
Morphological Description
(Rosgen stream type)
Bc
F (upstream)/
Gc (downstream)
Gc (upstream)/
Bc (downstream)
Bc
Bc
Evolutionary Trend
Bc4Gc4F
Bc4Gc4F
Bc4Gc4F
Bc4Gc4F
Bc4Gc4F
Underlying Mapped Soils
WoA
WoA
WoA
WoA
WoA
Drainage Class
Poorly drained
Poorly drained
Poorly drained
Poorly drained
Poorly drained
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric
Hydric
Hydric
Hydric
Hydric
Average Channel Slope (ft/ft)
0.0165
0.0083
0.014
0.0102
0.0172
FEMA Classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Native Vegetation Community
Piedmont Small Stream
Percent Composition of Exotic/Invasive Vegetation
<5%
2Y'6
<5%
<5%
<5%
Parameters
Reach R6
Reach R7
Reach Tl
Reach T2
Length of Reach (linear feet)
1,828
646
242
171
Valley Classification (Rosgen)
VII
VII
VII
VII
Drainage Area (acres)
32
14
49
5
NCDWR Stream Identification Score
25 / 30
23 / 35
23.75
20.75
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C
Morphological Description
(Rosgen stream type)
G5c (upstream)/
B5c (downstream)
G5 (upstream)/
B5c (downstream)
B5c
B5c
Evolutionary Trend
Bc4Gc4F
Bc4Gc4F
Bc4Gc4F
Bc4Gc4F
Underlying Mapped Soils
WoA
WoA
WoA
WoA
Drainage Class
Poorly drained
Poorly drained
Poorly drained
Poorly drained
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric
Hydric
Hydric
Hydric
Average Channel Slope (ft/ft)
0.015/0.025
0.025
0.02
0.041
FEMA Classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Native Vegetation Community
Piedmont Small Stream
Percent Composition of Exotic/Invasive Vegetation
1 <5%
<5%
<5% 1
<5%
Regulatory
Considerations
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
Categorical Exclusion
(Appendix B)
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
Categorical Exclusion
(Appendix B)
Endangered Species Act
No
N/A
Categorical Exclusion
(Appendix B)
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
Categorical Exclusion
(Appendix B)
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
Categorical Exclusion
(Appendix B)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
Yes
1 Categorical Exclusion
(Appendix B)
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
Categorical Exclusion
(Appendix B)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Fb
Reach R6
(upstream)
Reach R6
(downstream) I
Reach R7
(upstream)
Reach R7
(downstream)
NCOneMap Orthoimagery 2017
I N T E R N AT 10 N A L
Reach R5
(downstream)
,..�-A6.. r
. �02
Reach l
Reach R5
(upstream)
�2/ Reach T1
Reach R2
(downstream)
f s^'
n Reach R1
0 250 500
Feet
DEQ DMS Project # 96074
Reach R4
(downstream)
r! • A�
Figure 5 Index Map
Current Condition Plan View
Thomas Creek Site - MY7

rN
Reach R3
(upstream)
Veg Plot 4
324 stems/ac
Veg Plot 3 Soil Amendments r ;f . Reach R4
364 stems/ac (0.14 ac) (upstream)
w. .
►�+ XS-2 Reach R3
(downstream)
Veg Plot 1
445 steams/ac
Veg Plot 5 Reach R4
405 stems/ac - (downstream)
xS
L•�
t PP 1•
XS-3 PP-16 774
Veg Plot 2PP-1732stems/ac
1FL1 Z*�PP-18
#w: y
XS-5
-
i. Conservation Easement
PP-20 Cross Sections
� Veg Plot 6 ;
364 stems/ac 0 Crest Gauge
r ® Flow Gauge
Photo -Points
Reach R2 Streams by Mitigation Type
(upstream) Restoration 'x S.
i
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
No Credit
Reach T2
Veg Plots - Year 7
Soil Amendment Location
0 100 200
Michael Baker Feet Figure 5A
Current Condition Plan View
N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L DEQ DMS Project # 96074 Thomas Creek Site - MY7

Reach
•'
k: x
• •
r ,
-.--''"
Reach R5
/ y..
-• •
Rim
-10
-
Ve
/
• • -
-dr r - -
�.
f i
"O-I`` Veg Plot 9
r 567 stems/ac
Veg Plot 1,5
;
567 stems/ac r
.J
FL2 A, 4 �1
#1
Reach R5
(downstream)
Veg Plot 10
4�':
=
XS-16
809 stems/ac
:.
• Y
f
Plot 12
Conservation Easement
769 stems/ac
:.' ' ..
Cross Sections
.
Crest Gauge
.
A
XS-11
Veg Plot 11
® Flow Gauge
�
�
= 769 stems/ac
,
Photo -Points
PP -34
_ �
3 XS-12 ',/r
a
Streams by Mitigation Type
Reach R1
Restoration
y
P-35
`
r
PP-35
_
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
No Credit
- Veg Plots - Year 7
0 100 200
Michael Baker Feet Figure 513
Current Condition Plan View
N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L DEQ DMS Project # 96074 Thomas Creek Site - MY7

Veg Plot 16
728 s}tems/ac
Reach R6
(upstream)
A
Conservation Easement
7 I t
Cross Sections
Photo -Points
Streams by Mitigation Type
Restoration►
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
No Credit
- Veg Plots - Year 7
now-
h
Reach R7
Veg Plot 15 (upstream)
647 stems/ac
I N T E R N AT 10 N A L
Reach R7
(downstream)
0 100 200
Feet
DEQ DMS Project # 96074
1
N.
4.
' p
F:
A,�
Reach
(downstream)
is
Reach R5411
(upstream) r
Figure 5C
Current Condition Plan View
Thomas Creek Site - MY7

Table S. Visual Steam Morphology Stability Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DIMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach ID: Reach 1
Assessed Length (LF): 298
Major Channel Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
Per As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
9
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
9
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Wood Veg.
Y 9�
Footage with Adjusted %for
Stabilizing Stabilizing
Wood Veg. Wood Ve
Y 9� Y 9.
1.Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not
to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
3
3
100%
1 Bed
3. Meander Pool Condition
1. Depth - Sufficent (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bkf Depth >_ 1.5)
3
3
100%
2. Length - Sufficent (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and
head of downstream riffle)
3
100%
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
3
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
100%
1. ScouredlEroc in
Bank lackin ve etative cover due to active scour and erosion
100 %
0
0 100%
2. Bank
2. Undercut
Banks untlercutloverhan in to the extent that mass wasting is ex ected
100%
0
0 100%
3. Mass WastingBanks
slum in , cavingor collapse
100%
0
0 100%
Totals
100%
0
0 100%
3. Engineering Structures
1. Overall Inte ri
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
3
3
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100
22. Pi in
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or arms
3
3
100%
3. Bank Position
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
3
3
100
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >_ 1.5.
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at low flow
3
3
100%
Table S. Visual Steam Morphology Stability Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DIMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach ID: Reach 2
Assessed Length (LF): 2,126
Major Channel Category
Channel Sub -Category
Number Stable,
Metric Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
e9
Amount of
Unstable
Foote 9e
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Wood Veg.
Y 9�
Footage with Adjusted %for
Stabilizing Stabilizing
Wood V Wood V
Y e9- Y e9-
1.Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not
to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcur ing
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 38
38
100%
1. Bed
3. Meander Pool Condition
1. Depth - Sufficent (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bkf Depth >_ 1.5) 41
41
100%
2. Length - Sufficent (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and
head of do -stream riffle) 41
41
100%
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 41
41
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide) 41
41
100%
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
0
100%
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhan in to the extent that mass Wastin is ex ected
0
0
100%
0 0 100%
ZEngin-ring
3. Mass Wasting
Banks slumpin , cavin or collapse
0
0
100%
0 0 100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0 0 100%
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
27
27
100
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
24
24
100
22. Pi in
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or arms
27
27
100%
3. Bank Position
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
27
27
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >_ 1.5.
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at low flow
13
13
100%
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 5. Continued Visual Steam Morphology Stability Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach ID: Reach 3
Assessed Length L : 1,031
Major Channel Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
9
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
9
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Wood Vag.
Y 9�
Footage with
Stabilizing
Wood Vag.
Y 9�
Adjusted %for
Stabilizing
Wood Ve
Y 9.
1. Bed
1.Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not
to include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of clowncrutting
1. Texture Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
16
16
0
0
100%
100%
2. Riffle Condition
3. Meander Pool Condition
1. Depth - Sufficent (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bkf Depth >_ 1.5)
15
15
100%
2. Length - Sufficent (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and
head of downstream riffle)
15
15
100%
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
15
15
100%
2. Thalweq centering at downstream of meander bend Glide
15
15
100%
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercutJoverhanging to the extent that mass wasting is expected
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
2. Bank
3. Mass Wasting
Banks slumping , caving or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineering Structures
11. Overall Integrity
Stmctures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
10
10
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or arms
10
10
100%
3. Bank Position
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
10
10
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >_ 1.5.
Rootwads/locis providing some cover at low flow
7
7
100%
Table 5. Continued Visual Steam Morphology Stability Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach ID: Reach 4
Assessed Length L : 1,238
Major Channel Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody Vag.
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody Vag.
Adjusted%for
Stabilizing
Woody Veg.
1.Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formationgrowth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not
[o inclutle oin[ bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcuttin
1. Texture Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
8
8
0
0
100%
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Bed
3. Meander Pool Condition
1. Depth - Sufficent (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bkf Depth >_ 1.5)
8
8
100%
2. Length - Sufficent (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and
head of downstream riffle)
8
8
100%
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thai centerin a[ u stream of meantler bentl Run
8
8
100%
2. Thalwe centerin at downstream of meander bentl GlideF
8
8
100%
1. ScouredlEroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
0
0
1 W9-:
0
0
100%
2. Bank
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhan in to the extent that mass wastingis expected
7k
0
1 W9-:
0
0
100%
3. Mass Wasting
Banks slumping, caving or collapse
0
0
1 On
0
0
100%
Totalsl
0
1 0
1 1On
1 0
1 0
100%
3. Engineering Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
4
4
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
1
1
100
2a. Pi in
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or anus
4
4
100%
3. Bank Position
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
4
4
100
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >_ 1.5.
Rootwads/lo s providingsome cover at low flow
''
''
100%
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 5. Continued Visual Steam Morphology Stability Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach ID: Reach 5
Assessed Length L : 1,169
Major Channel Category
Channel Sub -Category
Number Stable,
Metric Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
9
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
9
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Wood Vag.
Y 9�
Footage with
Stabilizing
Wood Vag.
Y 9�
Adjusted %for
Stabilizing
Wood Ve
Y 9.
1.Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not
to include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcuttin
1. Texture Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
17
17
0
0
100%
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Bed
3. Meander Pool Condition
1. Depth - Sufficent (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bkf Depth >_ 1.5) 18
18
100%
2. Length - Sufficent (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and
head of downstream riffle) 18
18
100%
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 18
18
100%
2. Thalwe centeringat downstream of meander bend Glide 18
18
100%
1. Scouredt roding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
0
1 W9-:
0
0
100%
2. Bank
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhangingunderculloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting is expected
0
1 W9-:
0
0
100%
3. Mass Wasting
Banks slumping, caving or collapse
0
0
1009-:
0
1 0
100%
Totalsl
0
1 0
1 1On
1 0
1 0
100%
3. Enaineerina Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
16
1 16
1
1 100
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
1
1
1 100
22. Pi in
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or arms
16
16
100%
3. Bank Position
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
16
16
100 1
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >_ 1.5.
Rootwads/lo s providingsome cover at low flow
15
15
100%
Table 5. Continued Visual Steam Morphology Stability Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach ID: Reach 6
Assessed Length L : 1,776
Major Channel Category
Channel Sub -Category
Number Stable,
Metric Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
9
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
9
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with Footage with Adjusted %for
Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Wood V Wood Veg. Wood Ve
Y Veg. Y 9� Y 9.
1.Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect Flow laterally (not
to inclutle oin[ bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of clowncutting
1. Texture Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 6
6
0
0
100%
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Bed
1. Depth - Sufficent (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bkf Depth >_ 1.5) 5
5
100%
3. Meander Pool Condition
2. Length - Sufficent (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and
head of downstream riffle) 5
5
100%
4. Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 5
2. Thalweq centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
5
100%
100%
1. ScouredlEroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
0
100%
0 0 100%
2. Bank
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhangingundercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting is expected
0
100%
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting
Banks slum in , raving or collapse
0
0
100%
0 0 100%
Totalsl
0
0
1 100%
1 0 1 0 100%
3. Engineering Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
0
0
-
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
0
0
-
2a. Pi in
Structures lacking any substantial Flow untlerneath or around sills or arms
0
0
-
3. Bank Pasilmn
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
0
0
-
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth ratio>_ 1.5.
Roolwads/lo s providing some cover at low flow
0
0
-
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 5. Continued Visual Steam Morphology Stability Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DIMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach ID: Reach 7
Assessed Length L : 647
Major Channel Category
Channel Sub -Category
Number Stable,
Metric Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
9
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
9
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Wood Vag.
Y 9�
Footage with
Stabilizing
Wood Vag.
Y 9�
Adjusted %for
Stabilizing
Wood Ve
Y 9.
1.Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not
to include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of clowncutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
100%
1. Bed
3. Meander Pool Condition
1. Depth - Sufficent (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bkf Depth >_ 1.5) 6
6
100%
2. Length - Sufficent (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle antl
head of downstream riffle) 6
0
100%
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 6
6
100%
2. Thalwe centerin at downstream of meander bend (Glide) 6
100%
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
0
0
100T/' 0
0
100%
2. Bank
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhan in to the extent that mass wastingis expected
C
100 % 0
0
100%
3. Mass Wasting
Banks slumping, caving or collapse
(:
100% 0
0
100%
Totalsl
0
1 C
100% 0
0
100%
3. Enaineerina Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
lGracle control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or anus
2
2
100%
3. Bank Position
1Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
2
2
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >_ 1.5.
Rootwads/lo s providing some cover at low flow
2
2
100%
Table 5. Continued Visual Steam Morphology Stability Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DIMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach ID: Reach T7
Assessed Length L : 227
Major Channel Category
Channel Sub -Category
Number Stable,
Metric Performing as Total Number
Intended Per As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
e9
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
9
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Wood Vag
Y 9�
Footage with
Stabilizing
Wood Vag
Y 9�
Adjusted %for
Stabilizing
Wood Ve
Y 9.
1.Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not
to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
1. Bed
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 4 4
100%
3. Meander Pool Condition
1. Depth - Sufficent (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bkf Depth >_ 1.5) 5 5
100%
2. Length - Sufficent (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and
head of downstream riffle) 5 5
100%
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 5 5
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide) 5 5
100%
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhangingunderculloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting is expected
0
0
100%
0
0 100%
2. Bank
3. Mass Wastin
Banks slumping, cavinor collapse
0
0
100%
0
0 100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0 100%
3. Engineering Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 1
100%
2. Grade Control
2a. Piping
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill 1
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or anus 1
100
100%
3. Bank Position
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15% 1
100
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >_ 1.5. 1
Rootwads/lo s providing some cover at low flow
100%
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 5. Continued Visual Steam Morphology Stability Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach ID: Reach T2
Assessed Length (LF): 157
Number Stable,
Total Number
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Number with
Footage with
Adjusted %for
Major Channel Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Performing as
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Intended
per As -built
Segments
9
Footage
9
Intended
Wood Vag.
Y 9�
Wood Veg.
Y 9�
Wood Ve
Y 9.
1. Aggratlation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect Flow laterally (not
1.Vertical Stability
to include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of tlowncuffing
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
3
100%
1. Bed
1. Depth - Sufficent (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bkf Depth >_ 1.5)
100%
3. Meander Pool Condition
2. Length - Sufficent (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and
head of downstream riffle)
100%
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweq centering at upstream of meander bend Run
2. Thalweq centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
100%
1. ScouredlErodin
Bank lackingvegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
0
0
100% 0
0
100%
2. Bank
2. Undercnt
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting is ex ectetl
0
0
100 % 0
0
100%
3. Mass WastingBanks
slumping, Gavin or collapse
0
0
100 % 0
0
100%
Totalsl
0
0
100% 0
0
100%
3. Engineering Structures
1. Overall Inte ri
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or to s
1
1
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibitingmaintenance of ratle across the sill
1
1
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any subs[antlal flow underneath or around sills or anus
1
1
100%
3. Bank Position
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
1
1
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >_ 1.5.
4. Habitat
Roolwatls/lo s providingsome cover at low flow
1
1
100%
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 6. Vegetation Conditions Assessment
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Planted Acreage: 14.4
Vegetation Category
Defintions
Mapping Threshold
(acres)
CCPV Depiction
Number of Polygons
Combined Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
woody stem densities cleady below target levels based on MY3, 4,
0.1
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
or 5 stem count criteria.
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems or a size class that are obviously small
0.25
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreage: 22.7
Vegetation Category
9 9 y
Defintions
Mapping Threshold
PP 9
CCPV Depiction
P
Number of Polygons
y9
Combined Acreage
9
%of Planted
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
1000 ft2
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
none
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Thomas Creek: MY7 Stream Station Photo -Points (from 3/25/22)
PP-1: Reach 3, view upstream, Station 11+50
PP-3: Reach 3, view upstream, Station 15+75
PP-5: Reach 3, view downstream towards pipe crossing,
Station 18+50
PP-2: Reach 3, view downstream, Station 12+00
PP-4: Reach 3, view downstream, Station 16+25
PP-6: Reach 3, stream crossing, Station 18+80

Thomas Creek: MY7 Stream Station Photo -Points (from 3/25/22)
PP-7: Reach 3, Station 19+00
PP-9: Reach 4, view downstream at Station 05+75
PP-11: Reach 4, view upstream at Station 10+10
PP-8: Reach 4, view downstream at Station 01+90
PP-10: Reach 4, view downstream at Station 06+10
PP-12: Reach 4, view upstream at Station 10+50

r.
r
is I f r l
m
OW
r
MWn
�_ 1
e f

Thomas Creek: MY7 Stream Station Photo -Points (from 3/25/22)
PP-19: Reach 2, view upstream at Station 22+00
PP-21: Reach 2, view upstream at Station 25+25
PP-23: Reach 2, view of crossing at Station 27+75
PP-20: Reach 2, view upstream at Station 23+00
PP-22: Reach 2, view downstream at Station 25+50
PP-24: Reach 2, view downstream at Station 30+20

Thomas Creek: MY7 Stream Station Photo -Points (from 3/25/22)
PP-31: Reach 2, Crest Gauge at Station 38+90
PP-33: Reach 2, view upstream at Station 41+50
PP-35: Reach 1, view downstream at Station 43+25
PP-32: Reach 2, view downstream at Station 39+40
PP-34: Reach 1, view upstream at Station 42+75
PP-36: Reach 1, view of drainage on left bank at
Station 44+00

Thomas Creek: MY7 Stream Station Photo -Points (from 3/25/22)
PP-37: Reach 6, view upstream at Station 10+75
PP-39: Reach 6, view upstream at Station 15+25
PP-41: Reach 6, view upstream at Station 25+50
PP-38: Reach 6, view upstream at Station 11+50
PP-40: Reach 6, view upstream at Station 18+90
Y6,'
p
i
PP-42: Reach 7, view upstream at Station 10+40

Thomas Creek: MY7 Stream Station Photo -Points (from 3/25/22)
PP-43: Reach 7, view of stabilized drainage at Station 13+50
PP-45: Reach 5, view upstream at Station 30+25
PP-47: Reach 5, view downstream at Station 31+40
PP-44: Reach 7, view upstream at Station 15+00
PP-46: Reach 5, view downstream at Station 30+75
PP-48: Reach 5, view downstream at Station 32+50

Thomas Creek: MY7 Stream Station Photo -Points (from 3/25/22)
PP-49: Reach 5, view upstream at Station 33+10
PP-51: Reach 5, Flow Gauge #2 at Station 33+90
PP-53: Reach 5, view upstream at Station 36+40 (6/17/2022)
PP-50: Reach 5, view downstream at Station 33+75
PP-52: Reach 5, view of crossing at Station 35+00 (note: no
cattle in upper field so gate is OK to have open)
PP-54: Reach 5, view upstream at Station 36+75

Thomas Creek: MY7 Stream Station Photo -Points (from 3/25/22)
PP-55: Reach 5, view downstream at Station 37+30
PP-57: Reach 5, view upstream at Station 39+90
(the confluence of R5 and R2)
PP-56: Reach 5, view upstream at Station 38+50 (6/17/2022)
PP-58: Reach T2, view upstream at Station 10+80

�u• "
"FIR
_ 11 A i S
r y
F r t
"i
f
} a41Y' IW
R

«• j- ". 5 - - �Wn
Fq
.fit �y: � �" � z e g -t 4 '•�:
or
�',�• p .. Yam., .at J0..', at � � � t
44
nr
!

Thomas Creek: MY7 Vegetation Plot Photographs
Vegetation Plot 13 — October 2022
Vegetation Plot 15 — October 2022
Vegetation Plot 14 — October 2022
Vegetation Plot 16 — October 2022

Thomas Creek: MY7 Crest Gauge Photographs
Crest Gauge on Reach R2 at Station 38+90
(photo from 10/19/22)
Overbank event of 0.67 ft on 1/3/22
(photo from 3/25/22)
Overbank event of 0.67 ft on 1/3/22
(photo from 3/25/22)

Thomas Creek: MY7 Additional Monitoring Photographs
Flow Gauge #1 on Reach R2 (photo: 10/19/22)
Flow Gauge #2 on Reach R5 (photo: 10/19/22)
Crest Gauge on Reach R2 (photo: 10/19/22)
Flow Gauge #1 on Reach R2 (photo: 5/18/16)
Flow Gauge #2 on Reach R5 (photo: 5/18/16)
Crest Gauge on Reach R2 (photo: 5/18/16)

Thomas Creek: MY7 Additional Monitoring Photographs
R2 bank scour MY3 (photo: 6/13/18)
1st previously repaired bank MY7 (photo: 3/25/22)
R2 bank scour MY3 (photo: 6/13/18) 2°a previously repaired bank MY7 (photo: 3/25/22)
R3 soil amendments (photo: 10/19/2022) R3 soil amendments (photo: 10/19/2022)

Thomas Creek: MY7 Additional Monitoring Photographs
Flow on upper R6, upstream (photo: 3/25/2022)
Flow on upper R6, upstream (photo: 3/25/2022)
R2 station 37+50 MY7 photo of riffle (photo: 3/25/22)
Flow on upper R6, upstream (photo: 3/25/2022)
Flow on upper R6, upstream (photo: 3/25/2022)
R2 station 37+50 As -built photo of riffle (photo: 4/28/16)

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. CVS Density Per Plot
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Current Plot DOWN
.
�000000000000000000000000000000
�.
pignut hickory
American witchhazel
American holly
eastern redcedar
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
black cherry
Quercus rnichauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Rhos copallinum
flarneleaf sumac
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Sassafras albidurn
Viburnum dentaturn
southern arrowwood
Stem couni m©®o0m0©m0ommmm0©mm0®OmmOommmm
size (ares) 0000000000
size (ACRES) ,
Species couni ©©000000000®00®OODDODD©00©OD©m
Stems perACRE
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 0•
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 0%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 0•
Fails to meet requirements by more than ,%
Includes -lu meer stems
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 7. CVS Density Per Plot
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Current Plot Data (MY7 2022) Continued
�000000000000000000000000000Viburnum
I I
000000
MMM
Ca rpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
pignut hickory
11
American holly
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
black cherry
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
northern red oak
Sassafras allaidurn
dentaturn
southern arrowwood
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
mommo®mmmmmmmm®mmm®mm®m�mmmmmmmom
000000mmmmm
o©mo©m©000©moomo©mmmmmmmmmmmmmm�m
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm®mmmmmmm®�mmmmmmmom
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by .•
Exceeds requirements, but by less than .%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than .•
Fails to meet requirements by more than ,%
MICH LL 3AKLR CNQNCCRINGINC.
YLAN 7 MON11 OHING NLYOH I
111ONIAS CNLLK NIS I ONA HON YNOJ LC1 (OMS YNOJ LC1 NO.1O 96071)

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Summary Information
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Year 7 (October 2022)
Vegetation Plot Summary Information
Plot #
Riparian
Buffer Stems'
Stream/
Wetland
Stems'
Live
Stakes
Invasives
Volunteers'
Total'
Average
Height (ft)
1 n/a 11 0 0 2 13 12
2 n/a 8 0 0 2 10 10
3 n/a 9 0 0 5 14 8
4 n/a 8 0 0 9 17 5.5
5 n/a 10 0 0 16 26 6
6 n/a 9 0 0 5 14 14
7 n/a 17 0 0 4 21 22
8 n/a 9 0 0 11 20 11
9 n/a 14 0 0 4 18 14
10 n/a 20 0 0 14 34 12
11 n/a 19 0 0 4 23 18
12 n/a 19 0 0 4 23 15
13 n/a 14 0 0 10 24 13
14 n/a 16 0 0 10 26 6
15 n/a 16 0 0 15 31 10
16 n/a 18 0 0 11 29 13
Wetland/Stream Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Plot #
Stream/
Wetland
Stems'
Volunteers'7TotaO
Success Criteria
Met?
Plot #
Riparian
Buffer
Stems'
Success
Criteria Met?
1 445
81 526 Yes
1
n/a
n/a
2 324
81 405 Yes
2
n/a
n/a
3 364
202 567 Yes
3
n/a
n/a
4 324
364 688 Yes
4
n/a
n/a
5 405
647 1052 Yes
5
n/a
n/a
6 364
202 567 Yes
6
n/a
n/a
7 688
162 850 Yes
7
n/a
n/a
8 364
445 809 Yes
8
n/a
n/a
9 567
162 728 Yes
9
n/a
n/a
30 809
567 1376 Yes
10
n/a
n/a
11 769
1 162 931 Yes
11
n/a
n/a
12 769
162 931 Yes
12
n/a
n/a
13 567
405 971 Yes
13
n/a
n/a
14 647
405 1052 Yes
14
n/a
n/a
15 647
607 1255 Yes
15
n/a
n/a
16 728
445 1174 Yes
16
n/a
n/a
Project Avg 549 319 868 Yes
Project Avg
n/a
n/a
Stem Class Characteristics
Buffer Stems Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No vines.
Stream/ Wetland
Stems Native planted woody stems. Includes shrubs, does NOT include live stakes. No vines
'Volunteers Native woody stems. Not planted. No vines.
"Total Planted + volunteer native woody stems. Includes live stakes. Excl. exotics. Excl. vines.
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Failsto meet requirements, by less than 10%
Failsto meet requirements by more than 10%
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 9. Total Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot
Thomas Creek Restoration Project; DMS Project ID No. 96074
Botanical Name —T—Common
Name
Plots
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 11 1 12 13 14 15 16
Tree Species
Acerrubrum red maple
Betula nigra river birch
Carya glabra pignut hickory
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
Ilex opaca American holly
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar
Liquidambarstyraciflua sweetgum
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum
Pinus taeda loblolly pine
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore
Quercus alba white oak
Quercus palustris pin oak
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak
Quercus phellos willow oak
Ulmus americana american elm
3
3
1
Average
Stems Per
Acres
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
3
1
3
3
1
2
1
1
2
3
5
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
3
2
5
8
1
5
2
4
5
1
3
2
3
2
3
1
1
1
5
1
3
3
3
11
1
1 2
11
4
31
31
1
21
21
5
51
6
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
2
2
2
4
1
1
1
3
2
4
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
Shrub Species
Asimina triloba pawpaw
Baccharis halimifolia eastern baccharis
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam
Corpus amomum silky dogwood
Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac
Sambucus canadensis elderberry
Vaccinium corymbosum highbush blueberry
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood
1
1
3
1
3
5
5
4
4
4
2
2
5
6
5
1
1
1 2
1
1
5
1
2
3
4
3
3
10
4
3
Total Stems Per Plot - Year 7
13
10
14
17
26
14
21
20
18
34
23
23
24
27
31
31
Total Stems/Acre - Year 7
526
405
567
688
1052
567
850
809
728
1376
931
931
971
1052
1255
1174
868
Total Stems/Acre - Year 5
486
324
567
850
647.5
526
688
445
769
1295
890
1133
971
971.E
1214
1012
799
Total Stems/Acre - Year 3
647
405
1 364
1 850
486
567
728
486
688
809
850
890
647
769
567
890
665
Total Stems/Acre - Year 2*
688
445
405
850
445
526
809
486
648
809
850
8901
647
1 809
1 567
1052
683
Total Stems/Acre - Year 1
809
526
567
526
526
607
890
728
648
931
931
850
769
728
1 688
931
728
Total Stems/Acre for As -Built (Year 0)
850
6881
607
1 648
648
607
971
728
648
971
971
9311
8901
809
1 688
890
784
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Looking from Left Pin
Permanent Cross -Section 1
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from Right Pin
Feature
Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth
I W/D
BH Ratio
ER
I AB BKF
Elev
LTOB
Elev
Riffle
C
1 5.1
1 8.7
0.6
1.1
1 14.8
1 0.9
1 5.9
1 271.44
271.47
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 2
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from Right Pin
Stream
BKF
BKF
Max BKF
AB BKF
LTOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
Elev
Elev
Pool
13.9
1 10.9
1.3
1 2.6
1 8.6
1 -
270.65
270.65
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 2
Reach 3
276
275
274
273
O
As -built
O
272
Year 1
>
N
Year 2
w 271
Year
270
Year 5
t Year 7
269
--o-- Bankfull
268
--4-- Floodprone
0 10
20
30 40 50 60
70 80
Station (ft)

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 3
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from Left Pin
Looking from Right Pin
Feature
Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
AB BKF
Elev
LTOB
Elev
Riffle
I C
3.2
7.5
0.4
0.8
17.5
<1
4.7
1 264.45
264.42
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 3
Reach 3
270 1
269
268
As -built
c
267
Year 1
0
Year 2
M
a,
266
Year 3
m
w
--------------------------------------------------------
Year 5
265
-
t Year 7
------------
---------
------ MY7 BKF
264 MY7 BKF = 264.59'
---0-- AB Bankfull
TWG = 263.61'
263
---0-- d rove
Floo
0 10
20 30 40 50
60 70
Station (ft)
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 4
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from Right Pin
Feature
Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
AB BKF
Elev
LTOB
Elev
Riffle
I C
1 1.9
1 4.8
0.4
1 0.6
1 12
1 <1
1 3.8
1 265.46
265.51
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 5
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Feature
Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
AB BKF
Elev
LTOB
Elev
Riffle
I C
1 4.8
1 9.7
0.5
1 0.9
1 19.4
1 <1
1 3.7
1 262.63
262.49
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 5
269 Reach 2
268 As -built - Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
267 Year 5 Year 7
266 ------ MY7 BKF --0-- AB Bankfull
C
0 265 --o-- Floodprone
w 264
----------------------------------------------------------
263-------
-------------
MY7 BKF = 262.87'
262 TWG = 261.75'
261
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (ft)
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 6
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Feature
Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
AB BKF
Elev
LTOB
Elev
Riffle
I C
1 8.1
1 10.1
0.8
1 1.2
1 12.6
1 <1
1 6.2
1 259.42
259.36
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 6
Reach 2
262
261
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------0
c
260
As -built
4
Year 1
>
Year 2
-----------------
d
w
259
Year 3
Year 5
Year 7
MY7 BKF = 259.60'
258
-- MY7 BKF
TWG = 258.26'
--4-- AB Bankfull
257
--o-- Flood rone
0 10
20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (ft)
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 7
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Stream BKF BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 1.2 5.6 0.2 0.3 27.4 <1 3.1 258.57 258.88
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 8
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking at the Right Bank
Feature
Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
AB BKF
Elev
LTOB
Elev
Pool
I -
32.1
17.1
1.9
3.0
9.1
258.12
258.19
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 8
Reach 2
262
261
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------o
260
As built
C
259
Year 1
Year 2
d
258
Year 3
w
257
Year 5
Year 7
256
--o-- AB Bankfull
255
--o-- Floodprone
0
10
20 30 40 50 60
Station (ft)

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 9
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
BKF
Max BKF
AB BKF
LTOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
Elev
Elev
Pool
I -
25.5
16.4
1.6
3.5
10.5
255.05
254.39

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 10
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Stream BKF BKF Max BKF AB BKF LTOB
Feature Type BKF Area Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER Elev Elev
Riffle I C 1 6.7 1 9.3 0.7 1 1.1 1 13 1 0.9 1 8.0 1 254.18 254.22
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 10
Reach 2
257
256
Y
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
>
------
d------
w
254
-----
As -built
Year 1
— Year 2
Year 3
253
Year 5
Year 7
MY7 BKF = 254.35'
TWG = 253.10' ------ MY7 BKF
--4-- AB Bankfull
--o-- Floodprone
252
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
70 80
Station (ft)
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross-section 11
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
BKF
Max BKF
AB BKF
LTOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
Elev
Elev
Pool
19
1 8.7
2.2
1 3.9
1 3.9
249.04
249.11

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 12
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Feature
Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
6.8
12.4
0.5
0.9
22.6
<1
2.3
247.88
247.72
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 12
Reach 1
254
253
252
As -built
251
_
—
Year 1
o
�
250
Year 2
d
Year 3
w
249
--------------------------------------
Year 5
�Year7
248
------------------- -
---------------
- MY7 BKF
247
MY7 BKF=248.18'
--p-- AB Bankfull
TWG = 246.99'
--o-- Floodprone
246
0 10 20
30 40 50 60
70 80
Station (ft)
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 13
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Stream BKF BKF Max BKF AB BKF LTOB
Feature Type BKF Area Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER Elev Elev
Riffle I C 1 0.6 1 4.4 0.1 1 0.4 1 31.3 1 <1 1 3.7 1 295.07 295.06
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 13
Reach 6
301
300
299
298
As -built
o
Year
297
Year 2
�
w
296
Year 3
-----------------------------------
Year 5
295
------------"'
t Year 7
MY7 BKF=295.27'
294
TWG = 294.64'
------ MY7 BKF
--(3-- AB Bankfull
293
--o-- Floodprone
0 5 10
15 20 25 30 35
40 45 50
Station (ft)
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY5 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 14
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
BKF
Max BKF
AB BKF
LTOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
Elev
Elev
Riffle
E
2.7
5.8
0.5
0.8
12.4
<1
8.2
260.96
261.1
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 14
Reach 5
264
263
262
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M 261
-----------
m
As -built
Year 1
w
260
Year 2
Year 3
Year 5
t Year 7
259
MY7 BKF=261.33'
---- MY7 BKF
--4-- AB Bankfull
TWG=260.11'
258
--o-- Floodprone
0 10 20
30
40
50
Station (ft)
Note:Per DMS/IRT request, the bank height ratio for MY5 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from
the as -built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous
monitoring reports.

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 15
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Feature Type BKF Area Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER Elev Elev
Pool 5.7 6.5 0.9 1.5 7.4 259.27 259.43
Thomas Creek Cross -Section 15
Reach 5
263
262 Root -wad on outer bank, not
sediment deposition. Bank is
vegetated and stable.
261
------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------
As-built
0 260 Year 1
f0 Year 2
259
w Year 3
258 Year 5
—*--Year 7
257 --o-- AB Bankfull
--o-- 256 Floodprone
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (ft)

Figure 6. Year 7 Cross -Sections
Permanent Cross -Section 16
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2022)
Looking from the Left Bank
Looking from the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
BKF
Max BKF
AB BKF
LTOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
Elev
Elev
Pool
10.0
1 10.3
1.0
1 2.2
1 10.7
255.05
254.94

Figure 7. Pebble Count - Monitoring Year 7
Thomas Creek Mitigation Project, DMS# 96074
SITE OR PROJECT:
Thomas Creek
REACH/LOCATION:
Reach R2 (Station 37+00)
FEATURE:
Rock Riffle
DATE:
19-Oct-22
W72022
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
MATERIAL
PARTICLE
SIZE (rmnl
Total
Class %
%Corn
Silt/Clay
Silt / Clay
< .063
0%
0.063
Very Fine
.063 - .125
0%
0.125
Fine
.125-.25
0%
0.25
Sand
Medium
.25 - .50
0%
0.50
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
6
6%
6%
1.0
Very Coarse
1.0 - 2.0
6%
2.0
Very Fine
2.0 - 2.8
6%
2.8
Very Fine
2.8 - 4.0
6%
4.0
Fine
4.0 - 5.6
6%
5.6
Fine
5.6 - 8.0
6%
8.0
Gravel
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
6%
11.0
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
1
1 %
7%
16.0
Coarse
16-22.6
3
3%
10%
22.6
Coarse
22.6-32
5
5%
15%
32
Very Coarse
32 - 45
5
5 %
20%
45
VeryCoarse
45-64
15
15%
35%
64
Small
64 - 90
23
23%
58%
90
Cobble
Small
90-128
19
19%
77%
128
Large
128 - 180
17
17 %
94 %
180
Large
180-256
6
6%
100%
2s6
Small
256 - 362
100%
362
Boulder
Small
362-512
100%
512
Medium
512 - 1024
0
0%
100%
1024
Large VeLarge
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
zoaa
Bedrock
Bedrock
>2048
1 0
1 0%
100%
s000
Total % of whole count I 1 100 1 100
Largest particle= 512
Summary Data
Charnel materials
D16 =
13.0
D84 =
147.9
D35 =
48.3
D95 =
212.2
D50 =
71.7
D100 =
362 - 512
Thomas Creek (Reach R2)
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
CAB 2015
90%
---MY1 2016
80%
-->(--MY2 2017
70%
tMY32018
= 60%
-41--MY4 2019
m 50%
--A-MY5 2020
a
-MY6 2021
40%
>
-MY7 2022
30%
E 20%
U
10%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Thomas Creek (Reach R2)
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
100%
90%
• AB 2015
■ MYl 2016
80%
■ MY2 2017
70%
0 MY3 2018
= 60%
■ MY4 2019
m
v 50%
`m
■ MY5 2020
a. 40%
• MY6 2021
.2 30%
■ MY7 2022
U
20%
10%
0%
Particle Size Class (mm)

Figure 7. Pebble Count - Monitoring Year 7
Thomas Creek Mitigation Project, DMS# 96074
SITE OR PROJECT:
Thomas Creek
REACH/LOCATION:
Reach R5 (Station 37+00)
FEATURE:
Rock Riffle
DATE:
19-Oct-22
W72022
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
MATERIAL
PARTICLE
SIZE (nun)
Total
Cl.%
%Corn
Silt/Clay
Silt / Clay
< .063
3
3%
3%
0.063
Very Fine
.063-.125
3%
0.125
Fine
.125-.25
3%
0.25
Sand
Medium
.25 - .50
3
3%
6%
0.50
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
6%
1.0
Very Coarse
1.0 - 2.0
6%
2.0
Very Fine
2.0 - 2.8
6%
2.8
Very Fine
2.8 - 4.0
6%
4.0
Fine
4.0-5.6
6%
5.6
Fine
5.6-8.0
6%
8.0
Gravel
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
6%
11.0
Medium
11.0-16.0
2
2%
8%
16.0
Coarse
16 - 22.6
6
6%
14 %
22.6
Coarse
22.6 - 32
4
4 %
18 %
32
Very Coarse
32 - 45
10
10 %
28 %
45
Ver Coarse
45-64
17
17%
45%
64
Small
64 - 90
14
14%
59%
90
Cobble
Small
90 - 128
19
19%
78%
128
Large
128 - 180
12
12 %
90%
180
Large
180 - 256
7
7 %
97 %
1 256
Small
256-362
3
3%
100%
362
Small
362 - 512
100%
512
Boulder
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
1024
Large VeLarge
1024-2048
100%
2048
Bedrock
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
5000
Total % of whole count 100 1 100%
Largest particle=
Summary Data
Channel materials
D16 =
11.9
D84 =
138.5
D35 =
33.9
D95 =
193.1
D50 =
56.1
D100 =
256 - 362
..
�;.:
r""""7■1111111■■1111111■■Illllll���lll�i�l��llll
■■1111111■■1111111■■1111111�
/�■1111111■■1111111
■
� �
.,..
■
�
■■1111111■■1111111■■11111����/�■1111111■■1111111
■
■■1111111■■1111111■■1111!
,..
, , ,
,/r■1111111■■1111111
,..
■
, ,
■■1111111■■1111111■■Ili,�,i��■1111111■■1111111
■■1111111■■1111111■■1�/'Ih■■1111111■■1111111
,..
■
L__.....J■1111111■■1111111■l�;�'�I�II■■1111111■■1111111
� �
,..
■■1111111■■1111111■■1111111���.%''III■■1111111■■1111111
■■1111111■■IIIIII�t!!11�!��hr?''�III■■1111111■■1111111
,.
A°''"::.___:::::,1�1111111■■1111111■■1111111
,.
■■11
1 1 1 1 11 111 1111
Thomas Creek (Reach R5)
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
100%
90%
• AB 2015
■ MY1 2016
80%
■ MY2 2017
70%
MY3 2018
= 60%
■ MY4 2019
m
v 50%
`m
■ MY5 2020
a. 40%
• MY6 2021
0 30%
■ MY7 2022
U
20%
10%
Ll
t
0%
Particle Size Class (mm)

Tahle 10. Basel Stream Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Proj- DMS Pro'- ID No. 96074
Reach 1 - Length 298 ft
Reference Reach(es) Data
Parameter
USGS Gauge
Regiarul Curve
Pre-ais%g Condition
Doign
As -built
LiWe Beaver Creek (Wake County)
Dimension and Substrate-RiF&
LL
UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD n
Min
Mean Med Max SD n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD n
Min Mean
Med Max SD n
BF Wit
-----
11.6
11.9
----- ----- 90
-----
-----
12.5
----- -----
----- 13.9
.....
Floodpmne Widtb (ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- 9.0
-----
-----
>25
----- -----
----- 306
.....
BF Mean Dept t
-----
L2
1.5
----- ----- L2 ---
-----
BFMax Depth(ft)
----- l.9
-----
Li
----- -----
----- LI
----- ..... -----
BFCross-sectional A-(ft')
-----
-----
11,2 -----
----- ----- ----- IL2
-----
11.2
----- -----
----- ILI
----- ----- -----
Widtb/DepthR fi
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- 7.2 ----- -----
I2.0
----- ----- 180 ----- -----
-----
190
---- ---- ----- -----
----- 17.4
----- ----- ----- -----
Enuencbment Rmi
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- I.8 -----
L4
----- 2.2
----- -----
Bank116&Rati
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- 2.5 -----
LO
----- 1.1
----- ----- -----
50 ram
.....
.....
..... .....
..... .....
Pattern
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- MA
----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelMtidtb (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- 30.0 --- ---
iuso Curvature t
-----
-----
----- -----
----- -----
.---- ----- -----
25.0
.....
.... 35.0 ----- -----
----- 33.1
Rc:BankfoB width (Nft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
2.0
----- ----- 3.0 ----- -----
2.0
.....
... 2.8 ----- -----
----- 2.4
----- ----- ----- -----
Mean er Wave en8 t
.....
.....
..... .....
..... .....
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
..... 105.0 ----- -----
----- t03.4
Meander Widtb Rati
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
3.5
----- ----- 8.0 ----- -----
-----
2A
----- ---- -----
----- 2.5
-----
Prerde
----- ----- ----- ..... ..... .....
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- 24.0
----- ----- ----- -----
RiffleLength (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
RiffleSlope (Nft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.028 ----- -----
----- 0.025
----- ----- ----- -----
Poo LenBt t
.....
.....
..... .....
..... .....
.....
Poolto NO Spacing (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
m
-----
----- 60 ----- -----
----- M.0
----- ----- ----- -----
PooMax Dept t
.....
.....
..... .....
..... ..... .....
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 2.4 ----- -----
----- 2.5
Pool Volume (f6
.....
-----
----- -----
----- ----- -----
SubstrateandTransportPammelers `
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----
SC%/Sa%/G%/e%/ee
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----
' dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
-----
-----
----- -----
0.15/0.27/0.M/0.75/1.39
Reacb Sbear Suess (competency) lb/ft
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ..... -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (ram) mobilir d at bankf ll (Rosgen Curve
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
S.-P-(-pmtcapadty) W/m
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- -----
AdditianalReachParemeters ,
----- ----- ----- 0.38 ..... .....
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.38 ----- -----
----- -----
----- 0.38 ----- -----
DminakArea ISM)
-----
----- ----- -----
lmperviouscoverestimate(%
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
..... ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
RosgenClassificati
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- E ----- -----
-----
----- ----- C5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- C5 ----- -----
----- -----
----- C5 ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps)
3.4
4.0 -----
----- ----- ----- 3.9 ----- -----
3.5
----- ----- 5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 4 ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cis)
.....
27.6
44.6 -----
----- ----- ----- 44.6 ..... .....
.....
..... ..... ..... ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 44.6 ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
VAkyLengt-----
.....
..... .....
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- 271.1 ----- -----
Cbanndlength (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- 397
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 266 ----- -----
----- -----
----- 324.3 ----- -----
Sinuosi
----- LIS -----
1.1
----- ----- 1.3 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- L22 ----- -----
----- -----
----- L2 ----- -----
WaterSurfaceSlope(Cbannel)(ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.0028 ..... .....
.....
..... ..... ..... ..... -----
-----
-----
----- 0.022 ----- -----
----- -----
----- O.OWS ----- -----
BF M pe (ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.0050 ----- -----
0.002
----- ----- 0.015 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- O.O165 ----- -----
----- -----
----- 0.0201 ----- -----
Bmkfu0 Hoodplain Area (acres
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/EM
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
CbanndSmbilkYorHabimtMeni
R.nlnmral n� ndn
-----
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 10 co�oed. Baseline stream Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Project DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach 2 - Length 2,126 ft
Reference Reach(es) Data
Parameter
USGS Gauge
Regiorul Curve
Pre-aismrg Condition
Doign
As -built
LiWe Beaver Creek (Wake County)
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle
LL
UL Eq.J
L Min
Mean
Med Max SD o
Min
Mean Med Max SD o
Min
Mean
Med Max SD o
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
----- I0.9 -----
I0.2
I0.3
----- 10.4 ----- -----
Flood'- Widtb(ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
9.0
-----
----- 13.2
----- -----
-----
>I8
----- ---- ----- -----
38.2
58.5
..... 74.5 ----- -----
BFMeanDept t
.....
L2
L5 .....
0.6
.....
..... L2 ..... .....
.....
..... ..... ..... ..... .....
0.7
.....
..... 0.7 ..... .....
0.7
0.8
..... I.0
BFMaxDept t
.....
L6
..... 2.6 ..... .....
.....
..... ..... ..... ..... .....
0.8
.....
----- LO ..... -----
LO
L2
..... L5 ----- -----
BF Cross -sectional Area (W)
6.0
7.7 -----
7.7
-----
----- 15.7 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
6.0
-----
----- 7.7 ----- -----
7.4
8.6
----- I0.2 ----- -----
W' t Dept Rati
.....
.....
..... .....
3.4
.....
..... 5.4 ..... .....
I0.0
..... .....
----- I5.0 -----
I4.0
.....
.....
----- I9.0 -----
IO.I
12.5
----- I9.8 ----- -----
Enuencbee-Rati
-----
-----
----- -----
L4
-----
----- L4 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- >2.2 ----- -----
-----
>2.2
----- ---- ----- -----
3.7
5.7
..... 7.2 ----- -----
.---- LI
-----
LO
----- ---- ----- -----
0.9
LO
..... L0 ----- -----
Pattern
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
32.0
-----
----- 45.0 ----- -----
-----
56.6
----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Beltwidtb (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
RadiusofCurvature(f9
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
I7.0
-----
----- 30.0 ----- -----
-----
22.0
----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfu6 width (Nft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
2.0
----- ----- 3.0 ----- -----
2.0
-----
----- 3.0 ----- -----
-----
2.l
----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
75.0
-----
----- t07.0 ----- -----
-----
83.2
----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Rati
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
7.0
----- ----- 14.0 ----- -----
3.3
-----
----- 4.7 ----- -----
-----
5.5
-----
Pmfde
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
17.7
----- ----- ----- -----
Ri01eLength (f9
-----
----- ----- -----
Ri01eSlope (h/ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0.0094
-----
----- 0.02 ----- -----
-----
0.012
----- ----- ----- -----
Poo Longt
.....
.....
..... .....
.....
.....
.....
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
25
-----
----- 75 ----- -----
-----
50.8
----- ----- ----- -----
PoolMax Depth (fp
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
1.7
-----
----- 1.9 ----- -----
-----
l.7
----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (f6
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
SubstrateandTransportParametem ffi�
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----
SC%/Sa%/G%/e%/ee
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----
rdl6/ d35/ d50/ deg/ d95
-----
-----
----- -----
0. t t / 0.22/ 0. 32/ 0.85/ I.89
20.2/ 47.6/ 62.5/ 133.1/ 173.1
Reacb Sboo Suess (competency) lb/ft
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilised at bankf ll (Rosgeo Curve
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- -----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
S.- Power(vanspmtcapodty) W/m
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ..... .....
-----
Additional Reach Parameters
0.153
-----
----- 0.275 ..... .....
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.275 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.275 ----- -----
Dminak Area ISM)
-----
----- ----- -----
lmperviouscoverestimate(%
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
.....
..... ..... ----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgeo Classificati
-----
-----
----- -----
G5c
-----
----- F5 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- C5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- C5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- C5 ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps
.....
3.2
3.9 .....
3.8
-----
----- 3.9 ----- -----
3.5
----- ----- 5 ----- -----
3.8
-----
----- 3.9 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (ds)
.....
I7.8
291 .....
22.9
-----
----- 35.0 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
23.0
-----
----- 29.7 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
VolleyLengt-----
-----
..... .....
.....
.....
..... ..... ..... .....
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 2549.3 ----- -----
Channel length (ft)
----- 1.995
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
.....
..... 1,089 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 3413.7 ----- -----
Si-ii
-----
Ll7
-----
L2
----- ----- L5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 1.20 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- l.3 ----- -----
WaterSurfaceSlope (Cbannel) (ft/ft)
----- -----
-----
0.0082
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0.OW7
-----
----- 0.0083 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.0092 ----- -----
BF M pe (ft/ft)
.....
..
----- -----
-----
0.0098
----- ----- ----- -----
0.002
----- ----- O.OI ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.01 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.0123 ----- -----
Bankfu0 Hoodplain Area (acres
.....
..
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/E
-----
.....
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
ChanoelSmbilkYorHabimtMeni
-----
.....
.....
.....
..... ..... ..... .....
.....
----- ----- ----- ..... .....
.....
.....
..... .....
.....
.....
..... ..... ..... .....
Biolo 'nl or Otbe
t-PraExining Cnoditioo measummnt liken m existing smdbed NRe, As -Built measwement talwa, on consooned rock rlftle
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Tame10-0 eed. Bassett estream Summary
Thomas Creek Res..dmr Pro'ttt: DMS Pro' ct ID No. 96074
Reach 3 - Le.gth 1,031 ft
Reference Reach(es) Data
Parameter
USGS Gauge
Regi.-I Curve
Pre-ahi gC.mffler
Doign
As -built
Thomas Creek Site Upper Reach 4 (On -site)
Dimension and Snbstmte-Ri16e
LL
UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD o
Min
Mean Med Max SD n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
-----
TO
-----
7.5
8.4
..... 9.3 ----- -----
M.dpmne Widtb (ft
-----
-----
----- -----
6.7
----- ----- 9.5
----- -----
-----
>I6
.. ----- -----
37.3
16.3
----- 55.3 ----- -----
BF Mean Deptb (ft)
.....
1.2
1.5 .....
0.7
..... ..... 0.8
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
0.7
..... ..... .....
0.6
0.7
----- 0.8 ----- -----
BFMax Deptb(ft)
-----
LO
----- ----- L5
..
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
0.7
----- ----- -----
0.9
0.9
..... L.29 ----- -----
BF Cmss-sectional Area (ft')
26.8
36.2 -----
3.0
----- ----- 4.3
.--
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
4A
----- ----- -----
4.5
5.9
----- 7.3 ----- -----
W' t Dept Rati
.....
.....
..... .....
6.5
..... ..... 6.7
10
..... .....
----- 14.0 -----
II.O
I2.0
.....
----- 13.0 -----
I1.9
12.1
----- 12.3 ----- -----
Enuencbee-R fi
-----
-----
----- -----
L5
----- ----- 1.8
..... >2.2 ----- -----
-----
>2.2
..... ..... ..... .....
5.0
5.5
..... 5.9 ----- -----
BankHei&h fie
-----
-----
----- -----
2.3
----- ----- 3.2
i)
----- 1.1 -----
-----
LO
-----
LO
LO
----- LO -----
Pattern ,
-----
32.2
----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Beltwidtb (ft
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- .....
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
I8 ----- ----- 28 -----
iuso Curvature t)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
.----
15
----- 21 ----- -----
-----
19.1
----- -----
Rc:Bankfull width (Nft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- .....
-
.. 3 ----- -----
2.0
-----
----- 2.7 ----- -----
-----
2.3
----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelengib (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- .....
.. ----- ----- -----
70
-----
----- 80 ----- -----
-----
77.5
----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Widtb R fie
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- .....
... ..... ----- -----
2.6
-----
----- 4.0 ----- -----
-----
3.8
-----
Pmfde ,
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ...
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
12.5
----- ----- ----- -----
RiffleLength (f9
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
RiffleSlope(Nft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
1.1
..... 2.0 ----- -----
-----
0.031
..... .... ----- -----
-----
O.W3
----- ----- ----- -----
Pwl Lengt t
.....
.....
..... .....
.....
.....
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
_
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
28.0
.....
..... 48.0 ----- -----
-----
47.2
----- ----- ----- -----
PoolMaxDepth(f)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
L5
..... ---- ----- -----
-----
l.3
----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (f6
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
Substrate and Transport Parameters t
SC%/Sa%/G%/B%/Be
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
'dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
-----
-----
----- -----
.014/.029/ 0.41/ 1.16/ 3.05
Reacb Sbear Suess (competency) lb/ft
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ..... ..... ..... .....
---
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
Max part sits (mm) mobiliz d at bankfull ft gen Curve
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
s-Pmer(vanspmtcapadty) W/m
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- -----
AddmmralReachPammeters -
-----
----- ----- 0.083 ----- .....
-----
-----
----- 0.083 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.083 ----- -----
DminakArea (SM)
-----
----- ----- -----
--- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
lmperviouscoverestimate(%
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- .....
---
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classificati
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- 135c ..... ...
..
----- ----- FIC5 ----- -----
----
-----
----- E/C5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- C5 ----- -----
BF ocnY Ps
.....
3.1
3.6
3-8
..... ...
3.5
----- ----- 5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 3.8 -----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cis)
.....
9.4
16.5 .....
12.2
----- ----- 16.5 ..... ...
...
..... ..... ..... ..... -----
-----
-----
----- 16.5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
ValleyLengt-----
-----
..... -----
.....
..... ..... ..... ..... ...
---
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 873 ----- -----
Channel length (ft)
----- I.067
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
.....
..... 1.231 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- I.031 ----- -----
Sinuosi
----- L22 -----
L20
----- ----- L50 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- L20 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- L2 ----- -----
WaterS,ed- Slope(Cbannel)(ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- 0.0I50 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.0I50 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.0092 ----- -----
BFsbpe(ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- O.W82 ----- -----
0.005
----- ----- O.W5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- O.OI82 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- DAM ----- -----
Bmkf,fl Hoodpl"' Area acres
.....
.....
..... .....
.....
..... .....
..... ..... .....
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/E
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelSmbilkyorHabimtMeni
-----
-----
..... .....
.....
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
Biologinl or Otbe
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- -----
1 -PeeE ing Caoditioo measammnt ukeo m existing dbed NRe
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Parameter
USGS Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reaches) Data
Design
As -butt
Thomas Creek Site UpW, Reach 4 (Dn-site)
Dimenvon and Substsate-Riffle
LL
UL Eq.
IMin Mean Med Max SD n
Min
Mean Med Max SD n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD n
Min Mean
Med Max SD n
Flondpmne Widtb (ft)
-----
----- -----
... ..... 9.9 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
>l3
.. ----- -----
----- 2L9
----- ----- ----- -----
BF Mean Deptb (ft)
.....
1.2
L5 .....
... ..... 0.7 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
0.5
..... ----- -----
----- 0.5
----- ----- ----- -----
BF Max Depth (ft)
-----
... ..... L9 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
0.6
----- ----- -----
----- 0.9
----- ----- ----- -----
BFCross-sectional Area(W)
-----
-----
3.1 .....
... ..... It ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
It
----- ----- -----
----- 3.6
----- ----- ----- -----
Width/DepthR fi
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- 6.4 ----- -----
I0.0
----- ----- 14.0 ----- -----
12.0
....
..... 14.0 ----- -----
----- 12.7
----- ----- ----- -----
EnuencbmentRfi
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- 2.2 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- >2.2 ----- -----
-----
>2.t
----- ---- ----- -----
----- 3.2
----- ----- ----- -----
BankHeigbtRati
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- 3.0 ----- -----
LO
----- ----- 1.1 ----- -----
-----
1.0
----- ---- ----- -----
----- LO
----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern i
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
20.0
-----
----- 29.0 ----- -----
----- M.0
----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelMtidtb (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (f)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
12.0
-----
----- I8.0 ----- -----
----- 16.9
----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfull width (Nft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
2.0
----- ----- 3.0 ----- -----
2.0
-----
----- 3.0 ----- -----
----- 2.5
----- ----- ----- -----
MeanderWa..1"gib (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
60.0
-----
----- 75.0 ----- -----
----- 66.2
----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Widtb Rati
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
3.5
----- ----- 8.0 ----- -----
3.2
-----
----- 4.6 ----- -----
----- 5.0
-----
Pmfde -
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
.....
..... ..... ..... ..... .....
.....
.....
..... ..... ..... .....
..... 15.4
..... ..... ..... -----
RiffleLength (f)
.....
..... ..... .....
RiffleSlope (Nft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.029 ----- -----
----- 0.035
----- ----- ----- -----
Poo Lengt t
.....
.....
..... .....
..... .....
.....
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
28-
-----
----- 43 ----- -----
----- 42.8
----- ----- ----- -----
PoolMaxDepth(f)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- L5 ----- -----
----- l.3
----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (f6
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
SubstrateandTmnsportPammeters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----
SC%/Sa%/G%/B%/Be
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----
dl6 / d35 / d50 / dM / d95
-----
-----
----- -----
Reach Sbear Suess (competercy) lb/ft
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
Max part sits (mm) mobiliz d at bankfull (Rosgen Curve
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
SneamP-(-pmtcapadty) W/m
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
Addifi-1 Reach Parameters -
----- ----- ----- 0.056 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.056 ----- -----
----- -----
----- 0.056 ----- -----
DainakArea ISM)
-----
----- ----- -----
lmpervinuscoverestimate(%
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
RosgenClassificati
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- B5c ----- -----
-----
----- ----- C5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- C5 ----- -----
----- -----
----- C5 ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps)
3.2
3.9 -----
----- ----- ----- 3.6 ----- -----
3.5
----- ----- 5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 3.6 ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
BFDischarge(ds)
.....
I7.8
29J -----
----- ----- ----- tl.l ..... .....
.....
..... ..... ..... ----- -----
-----
-----
----- tl.l ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
VAkyLengt-----
-----
..... .....
..--- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- 285.55 ----- -----
Cbannd length (ft)
----- L197
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- I.201 ----- -----
----- -----
----- 342.91 ----- -----
Sinuosi
----- LI6 -----
L20
----- ----- L50 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- Ll3 ----- -----
----- -----
----- L20 ----- -----
WaterSud-Slope(Cbmml)(ft/ft
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- O.Ol2l ..... .....
.....
..... ..... ..... ..... .....
-----
-----
----- O.Ot5 ----- -----
----- -----
----- O.OM ----- -----
BF *pe (ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- O.OI05 ----- -----
0.005
----- ----- O.Ot5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.024 ----- -----
----- -----
----- 0.0I88 ----- -----
Bmkfu8 Hoodplain Area (acres
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/E
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelSmbilkyorHabimtMeni
Rinlnmralnr D,M
-----
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT QMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Tahle 10 corfnned. Baseline Stream Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration W.j-: DMS Pro' W No.96074
Reach 5 - Length 1,169 ft
Parameter
USGS Gauge
Reglanal Curve
Pre -Existing Canditian
Reference Reach(es) Data
Doign
As -built
Life Beave)
Creek (Wake Ceunt
Dimenvan and Snbstmte-Rife
LL
UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Mac SD n
Min
Mean Medr Max SD n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD n
Min Mean
Med Max SD o
M.dpmne Widtb (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
7.8
----- ----- >30 ----- -----
....
----- -----
-----
>I6
----- ---- ----- -----
----- 49.9
.....
BF Mean Dept t
-----
L2
1.5 -----
0.4
----- ----- LO ----- -----
-----
..... ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
0.5
----- ---- ----- -----
----- 0.9
.....
BFMax Deptb(ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
0.8
----- L6 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
0.7
----- ---- ----- -----
----- L2
----- ..... -----
BF Cross -sectional Area (ft=)
-----
-----
4.0 .....
3.4
----- ----- 4.5 ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
3.6
----- ---- ----- -----
----- 6.8
----- ----- -----
t pt n
..... 14.0 ---
-----
I3.0
----- ---- ----- -----
----- 8.4
----- - - - ----- -----
uenc Enment Rati
-----
-----
----- .....
I.8
----- ----- 5.4
..... ..... >2.2 ----- -----
-----
>2.3
----- ---- ----- -----
----- 6.6
BankHeigbtRmi
-----
-----
----- -----
2.4
----- ----- LO -----
LO
----- 1.1
----- -----
Pattern
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
28
-----
----- 45 ----- -----
----- 58.6
----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelBeltwidtb (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
Radiosof corvamre (f)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
l4
-----
----- 20 ----- -----
----- 17.5
----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfoll width (Nft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
2
-----
----- 3 ----- -----
----- 2.0
----- ----- ----- -----
MeanderWavelength (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
60
-----
----- 90 ----- -----
----- 8L5
----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Widtb Rati
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
3.5
----- ----- 8 ----- -----
4.l
-----
----- 6.6 ----- -----
----- 6.8
-----
Profile
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- .....
-----
----- ----- ----- ..... .....
-----
-----
----- ----- ..... .....
----- 15.2
----- ----- ----- -----
RifeLength (f)
-----
----- ----- -----
RifeSlope(Nft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
0.0265
----- ---- ----- -----
----- 0.0196
----- ----- ----- -----
Poo Lengt t
.....
.....
..... .....
.....
.....
.....
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
25
-----
----- 55 ..... .....
..... 57.8
----- ----- ----- -----
PoolMax Depth (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
1.3
..... .... ..... .....
..... 1.7
----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (f6
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters .
Ri% / Ro% / P% / G% / S%-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----
SC%/Sa%/G%/B%/Be
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----
rdl6/ d35/ d50/ deg/ d95
-----
-----
----- -----
17.6/ 36.9/ 53.7/ 130.6/ I84.8
Reacb Sbear Suess (competency) lb/ft
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
Max part sirs (mm) mobilirsd at bankfoll (Rosgen Curve
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
S1reamP-er(-pmtcapadty) W/m
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- -----
Addih-1ReachPammeters ,
0.097
----- ----- 0.083 ..... .....
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.097 ----- -----
----- -----
11
----- 0.097 ----- -----
Dminak Area ISM)
-----
----- ----- -----
lmpervinuscoverestimate(%
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
..... ..... ..... ----- -----
-----
..... ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classificati
-----
-----
----- -----
B5c
----- ----- c ----- -----
-----
----- ----- C5 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- C5 ----- -----
----- -----
----- E5 ----- -----
BF omtY Ps
.....
3.7
.....
BF Discharge (Ifs)
.....
9.9
14.7 .....
14A
----- ----- 16.5 ..... .....
.....
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- I2.0 ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
ValleyLengt-----
-----
..... .....
.....
..... ..... ..... ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- 726.02 ----- -----
Channel length (ft)
----- I.022
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
.....
..... I.828 ----- -----
----- -----
----- I069.32 ----- -----
Sinoosi
-----
-----
-----
1.31
----- ----- L42 -----
L20
----- L50
Water Surface Slope(Cbmeel)(ft/ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- O.O177 ----- -----
-----
----- ..... ..... .---- -----
-----
-----
----- O.O124 ----- -----
----- -----
----- O.O123 ----- -----
BFsbpe(ft/ft)
.....
..
-----
-----
----- ----- O.O133 ----- -----
0.005
----- ----- 0.015 ----- -----
-----
-----
----- 0.0tm ----- -----
----- -----
----- O.OI85 ----- -----
Bmkfu0 Hoodplain Area (acres
-----
_---
-----
----- ----- ----- ..... .....
.....
..... ..... ..... .....
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/E
-----
----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelSmbil9YorHabimtMetd
-----
.....
.....
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
..... -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
Biolog2 or Otbe
-----
t-PraExining Cnoditioo measummnt liken m existing smdbed rife, As -Built measwement talwar on consvuned rock riffle
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Parameter
USGS Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reaches) Data
Doign
As -built
Thomas Creek Site UpW, Reach 4 (Gn-site)
Dimension and Substmte-Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD o
Min Mean Med Max SD o
Min Mean Med Max SD o
Min Mean Med Max SD o
----- 4.6 -----
----- 6.3 ----- ----- ----- -----
prone
F on W' t t
.....
..... ..... -----
4.5 ----- 6.5
----- -----
.----
----- 19.4 ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Mean Deptb (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ... ----- 0.60 ---
----- ----- -----
----- 0.3 .. ----- -----
----- 0.3 ----- ----- ----- -----
BFMax Depth (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.9 ----- -----
----- .... -----
----- 0.4 .. ----- -----
----- 0.6 ----- ----- ----- -----
BFCross-sectional A-(W)
-----
----- ----- -----
1.8 ----- ----- 2.5 -----
----- L5
----- 2.l -----
Widtb/Depth Rod
-----
----- ----- -----
0.9 ----- ----- 5.8 ----- -----
I2.0 ..... ----- 18.0 ----- -----
----- I4.0 .. ----- -----
----- 18.7 ----- ----- ----- -----
Enuencbee-Rati
-----
IA ----- L5 -----
L4 ----- 2.2 ----- -----
----- >2.0 .. ----- -----
----- 3.l ----- ----- ----- -----
Ban Hei tRati
.....
..... ..... .....
2.9 ..... .....
..... 4.4 -----
..... ..... .....
I.0 ----- 1.1
----- I.0 .. ----- -----
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----.....
Pattern i
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Belte idm (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
RadiusofCurvature(fp
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankf ll width (Nft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelengib (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Widtb Rod
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
Pmfde -
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... .... ..... .....
..... 12.5 ..... ..... ..... -----
RiffleLength (f9
.....
..... ..... .....
RiffleSlope(Nfp
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 0.04 ----- ---- ----- -----
----- 0.027 ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Levi,t
.....
..... ..... .....
..... .....
.....
Poolto Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 34.6 ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Max Depth (fp
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 1.0 ----- ---- ----- -----
----- 1.2 ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume p`6
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
SubstrateandTmn Mp Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC%/Sa%/G%/B%/Be
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Reacb Sbear Suess (compel 'y) lb/ft
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part sits (ram) mobiliz d at bankfoE (Rosgeo Curve
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
SneamPower(-putt capodty) W/m
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Addid-.1 Reach Parameters -
0.019 ----- ----- 0.050 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.05 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.05 ----- -----
Dainak Area ISM)
-----
----- ----- -----
lmpervlouscoverestimate(%
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ..... ..... ..... ----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgeo Classificati
-----
----- ----- -----
B5c ----- ----- G5c ----- -----
----- ----- ----- Ilk ----- -----
----- ----- ----- B5c ----- -----
----- ----- ----- C5 ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps
-----
2.8 ----- 4.l -----
4 ----- ----- 6 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 3.3 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (ds)
-----
----- ----- -----
5.1 ----- ----- I0.2 ..... .....
..... ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- l2 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
VolleyLengt-----
----- ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 20l ----- -----
Channel length (ft)
----- I.828
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- I.808 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 2I0 ----- -----
Sinoosi
----- Ll3 -----
LIO ----- ----- L30 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- I.05 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- I.04 ----- -----
WaterSurfaceSlope (Cbannel) (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
0.0148 ----- ----- 0.0250 ----- -----
----- ----- ..... ..... ..... -----
----- ----- ----- 0.030 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
0.0250 ----- ----- 0.0361 ----- -----
0.005 ----- ----- O.Ot5 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.033 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bankfug Hoodpla,n Area (acres
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/EM
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelSmbilAyorHab,mtMen,
Rinlnmralnr-
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT QMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 10 c.�oed. Baseline stream Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Wjo,L DMS Pro' ct ID No. 96074
Reach 7 - Length 647 ft
Parameter
USGS Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre-EAW.g Canditian
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As-bn0t
Thomas Creek Site Upper Reach 4 (Gn-site)
Di—sian and Substrate -Rif o
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD o
Min Mean Med Max SD o
Min Mean Med Max SD o
Min Mean Med Max SD o
BP Wit
-----
----�
.... 3.6
----- -----
----- 4.6
Floodprone Wkltb (ft
-----
-----
----- 5.9
----- ----- .....
..... ..... ..
BF Mean Deptb (ft)
-----
-----
----- 0.4 ---
----- ----- -----
----- 0.3 .. --- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Max Depth (ft)
-----
-----
----- 0.6 ----- -----
----- .... -----
----- 0.4 .. ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BFCross-Sectional A—(W)
-----
-----
----- l.6 -----
----- L5
Widtb/Depth Rat,
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 8.4 ..... .....
I2.0 ..... ----- 18.0 ----- -----
----- I4.0 .. ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
EnuencbmentRati
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- L5 ..... .....
L4 ----- ----- 2.2 ----- -----
----- ----- .. ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BankHeightRati
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 4.2 -----
I.0 ----- 1.1
----- ----- -----
50 ram
.....
..... ..... .....
..... .....
Pa tern
..... ..... ..... .....
..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
Channel Behwkltb (ft)
.....
..... ..... .....
Radiosof Curvature(f9
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankf ll width (Nft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelengib (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Widtb Rod
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
Pmfde
----- -----
..... .....
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
RiffleLength (fp
-----
----- ----- -----
RiffleSlope (Nfp
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Levi,t
.....
..... ..... .....
..... .....
-----
pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
PoolMax Depth (fp
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 1.0 ----- ---- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (f6
.....
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
SnbstrateandTmn Mp Parameters L _
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC%/Sa%/G%/B%/Be
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
' dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
-----
----- ----- -----
.012/0.29/0.43/0.87/1.39
Reacb Sbear Suess (compe—y) lb/ft
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ..... -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part sirs (ram) mobilised at bankf ll (Rosgen Curve
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
S.— Power(vanspmtcapodty) W/m
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
AddM-1ReachParameters ,
----- ----- ----- 0.022 ----- -----
..... ..... ----- ----- ----- .....
----- ----- ----- 0.022 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.022 ----- -----
Dminak Area ISM)
-----
----- ----- -----
lmperviouscoverestimate(%
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
RosgeoClassificati
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- B5 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- B5c ----- -----
----- ----- ----- B5c ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BFVelocity (fps)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- 3.6 -----
4 ----- ----- 6 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 3.33 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BFDischarge (ds)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 5.7 ..... .....
..... ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 5 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
VolleyLengt-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channellength (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 646 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 646 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sinuosity
-----
----- ----- -----
.....
----- ----- ----- LII -----
.....
LIO ----- L30
LII
----- ----- -----
WaterSurfaceSlope (Cbannel)(ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.025 ----- .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... -----
----- ----- ----- 0.032 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BFsbpe(ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.036 ----- -----
0.005 ----- ----- O.Ot5 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.036 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
an u oo ran a acres
-----
-----
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/EM
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelSmbilkYorHab,mtMen,
R.nlnmral n� ndn
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 10 c.m oed. Baseline stream summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Pro'ttt: DMS Pro' ct ID No. 96074
Reach TI - Length 227 ft
Parameter
USGS Gaoge
Regional Corve
Pre-EAW.g Canditian
Reference Reach(es) Data
Doign
As -boil
Thomas Creek Site Upper Reach 4 (Gn-site)
Di-sian and Substrate -Rif o
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD o
Min Mean Med Max SD o
Min Mean Med Max SD o
Min Mean Med Max SD o
BF Wiffi (1p
7.2
----- 7.0 .....
..... 8.5 ..... ..... ..... .....
Floodpmne Widtb (ft)
----- I0.8 ----- -----
----- ----- -----
..... ..... .. ----- -----
----- 30.6 ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Mean Deptb (ft)
-----
-----
..... 0.4 ----- -----
----- ----- ..... ..... -----
----- 0.6 .. ----- -----
----- 0.6 ----- ----- ----- -----
BFMax Depth (ft)
-----
-----
..... 0.7 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 0.7 .. ----- -----
----- 0.9 ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Cross -sectional Area (ft=)
-----
-----
----- 2.8 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 3.8 .. ----- -----
----- 5.3 ----- ----- ----- -----
Width/Depth Rod
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 18.6 .....
I2.0 ----- ----- I8.0 -----
----- I3.0 -----
-----
Enuencbee-Rod
..... L5 .....
L4 ..... ..... 2.2 ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... 3.6 ..... ..... ..... .....
Bank Height Rati
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 2.6 -----
I.0 ----- 1.1
----- ----- -----
Pa tern
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... 32.5 ..... ..... ..... .....
ChannelBehwkltb (ft)
.....
..... ..... .....
Radiusof Curvature(f9
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
13.5 ----- ----- 18.0 ----- -----
----- I4.0 ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfo6 width (Nft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
2.0 ----- ----- 2.6 ..... .....
..... 1.7 ----- ----- ----- -----
MeanderWavelengib (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ..... ..... ..... .....
..... 48.0 ----- ----- ----- -----
MeanderWidtb Rod
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
3.8
Pmfde
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- .....
----- ----- ----- ----- ..... .....
----- ----- ----- ----- ..... .....
----- 14.7 ----- ----- ----- -----
RiffleLength (fp
-----
----- ----- -----
RiffleSlope (Nfp
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 0.0135 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- O.OIl3 ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Levi,t
.....
..... ..... .....
..... .....
-----
poolto Poo Spacing
-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- -----
25 ----- ----- 42 ..... .....
..... 41.2
Pool Max Depth (fp
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 1.4 ..... ..... ..... .....
..... L4 ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (f6
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
SobstrateandT-Ms Parameters L _
Ri%/Ro%/P%/G%/S
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC%/Sa%/G%/B%/Be
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
-----
----- ----- -----
ReachSboo Suess (compe"y) lb/ft
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part sirs (ram) mobilised at bankfo6 (Rosgeo Curve
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
S.- Power( -pelt capodty) W/m
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
AddM-1ReachParameters ,
----- ----- ----- 0.077 ..... .....
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.077 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.077 ----- -----
DminakArea ISM)
-----
----- ----- -----
lmpervinuscoverestimate(%
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
..... ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgeo Classificati
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- B5c ----- -----
----- ----- ----- B5c ----- -----
----- ----- ----- B5c ----- -----
----- ----- ----- C5 ----- -----
BFVelocity (fps)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 5.0 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 3.66 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Disc arge (If.)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- I4.0
----- ----- ----- 13.9 ----- -----
-----
ValleyL.
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 218 ----- -----
Channel length (ft)
----- 242
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 253 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 227 ----- -----
Simmsi
----- I.09 -----
LIO ----- ----- L30 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- Ll6 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 1.04 ----- -----
WaterSurfaceSlope(Cbannel)(ft/ft
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.OW3 ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
----- ----- ----- 0.004 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF sbpe (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.0I20 ----- -----
0.005 ----- ----- O.O 5 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.005 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
an u oo ran a acres
-----
-----
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/EM
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelSmbilkYorHab,mtMen,
R.nlnmral n� ndn
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

continued. Base➢ne Stream Summary
Creek Restoration P j-: DMS Project W No.96074
1-Length 157 ft
Parameter
USGS Gauge
Reglanal Curse
Pre -Existing Canditian
Thomas Creek SiteUW rReach4(Onsih)
Doign
As -built
Dimendan and Substrate -Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD n
Min Mean Med Max
Min Mean Med Max SD n
Min Mean Med Max SD o
BF Wit
-----
-----
�--- 2.1
Floodpmne Widtb (ft)
-----
-----
----- 3.4
-----
-.. ----- -----
-
BF Mean Deplb (ft)
-----
----- ..... -----
----- 0.4
.....
... ----- -----
...
BFMax Depth (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.6
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Cross -sectional Area (ft=
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.8
-----
----- ----- --- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Width/Depth Rati
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 5.6
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ..... ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
EnuencbmentRat;
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 16 --- _
'" ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BankHeigbtRati-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 2.3 ----- .....
--- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Beltwidtb (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (f)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfo➢widtb(Nft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelengib (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Widtb Rati
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
Pmfde
----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
RiffleSlope (Nft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Poo Lengt t
.....
..... ..... .....
..... .....
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
PoolMax Depth (ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (f6
.....
----- ----- -----
-----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ro%/P%/G%/S
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC%/Sa%/G%/B%/B
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----
dl6 / d35 / d50 / dM / d95
-----
----- ----- -----
Reach Sbear Suess (competency) lb/ft
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
--- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max patt sirs (rem) mobilirsd at bankfo➢ (Rosgen Curve
-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
SneamP—er(vansP—paa'ty) W/m
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
---
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
AddM-1 Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.008
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.008 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.008 ----- -----
lmperviouscoverestimate(%
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
---
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
RosgenClassificati
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- B5c
--- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BFVelocity (fps)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 3.4
--- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Disc arge c s
.....
..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... 2.7
ValleyLengt
-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel length (ft)
----- l7l
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- l57 ----- -----
----- ----- ----- l57 ----- -----
Sinoosi-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- Ll7
--- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
WaterSadaceSlope(Cbannel)(ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.0414
--- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BFsbpe (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- 0.0417
--- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bankfu➢ FloodpbM Area (acres
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/E%
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ---
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
ChannelSmbil9YorHabimtMetri
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- -----
---
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table lla. Cmss-Section Morphology and HydraWic Monitoring Summary
Thomas Ceeek Restoration Pmj,,t: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Sttwatn Reach
Reach 3 (1,032 LF)
Cross-section X-1 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-2 (Pool)
Cross-section X-3 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
BF Width (it)
9.3
8K
8.3 8.6 -
8.7
8.7
10.5
10.2
10.2 10.0 -
10.3
10.9
7.5
7.1
7.0 7.4 -
6.5
7.5
BF Mean Depth (it)
OR
0.6
0.6 0.6 -
0.6
0.6
1.3
1.3
1.2 1.3 -
1.4
1.3
0.6
0.4
0.5 0.3 -
0.4
0.4
Widde'Depth Reim
11.9
14.1
13.7 14.4 -
15.1
14.8
8.3
8.0
8.5 7.6 -
7.5
8.6
12.3
16.9
15.5 21.3 -
16.9
17.5
BF Cross -sectional Area (it)
7.3
5.4
5.1 5.1 -
5.1
5.1
13.4
13.2
12.2 13.3 -
14.2
13.9
4.5
3.0
3.1 2.6 -
2.5
3.2
BF Max Depth (it)
1.3
1.1
1$ ID -
1$
1.1
2.1
2.1
2$ 25 -
29
2.6
09
0.7
0.7 07 -
0.8
0.8
Width d Floodprone Area (it)
55
52
51 51 -
51
51
61
62
60 63 -
63
64
37
34
34 34 -
37
36
Entrenchment Reim
5.9
6.0
6.1 5.9 -
5.9
5.9
-
-
- - -
-
-
5.0
4.9
5.0 4.5 -
5.7
4.7
Bank Height Reim
1.0
0.9
0.8 0.9 -
0.9
0.9
-
-
- - -
-
-
1.0
0.9
0.8 0.7 -
0.8
0.8
Wetted Perknaer(it)
10.9
10.0
9.6 8.9 -
9.1
25.4
13.1
12.8
12.6 118 -
11.9
12.4
8.7
7.9
7.9 7.6 -
6.8
7.8
Hydraulic Radios (it)
0.7
0.5
0.5 0.6 -
0.6
0.3
1.0
1.0
1.0 Ll -
1.2
1.1
0.5
0.4
0.4 0.4 -
0.4
0.4
d50 (mn)
StreamReachON
M
Reach 4 (1,238 LF)
Reach 2 upstream (703 LF)
Reach 2 d.(1,423 LF)
Reach T1 (227 LF)
Cross-section X-4 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-5 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-6 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-7 (Riffle)
Based on Dxed baseline bankfoll elevation
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
BF Width (it)
6.8
6.8
6.1 5.9 -
6.0
4.8
10.4
9.8
9.8 10.0 -
9.5
9.7
10.2
9.7
9.5 9.7 -
9.5
10.1
8.5
6.8
6.9
6.7 -
6.5
5.6
BF Mean Depth (it)
0.5
0.5
0.5 0.4 -
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.6 0.5 -
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.9
0.8 0.8 -
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4 -
0.4
0.2
Width/Depth Ratic
12.7
12.6
13.5 14.8 -
15.0
12.0
14.8
16.6
16.8 21.0 -
18.4
19.4
10.1
IIA
11.7 11.6 -
0.9
12.6
13.6
13.8
16.0
15.0 -
18.7
27.4
BF Cross -sectional Area (it)
3.6
3.6
2.8 2.3 -
2.4
1.9
7.4
5.8
5.6 4.8 -
4.9
4.8
10.2
8.3
7.7 8.0 -
8.2
8.1
5.3
3.4
3.0
3.0 -
2.3
1.2
BF Max Depth (it)
0.9
1.0
0.8 0.7 -
0.6
0.6
1.0
0.9
0.9 0.8 -
0.8
0.9
1.5
1.3
1.3 1.2 -
1.3
1.2
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6 -
0.5
0.3
Width d Floodprone Area (it)
22
22
21 20 -
22
19
38
37
36 36 -
36
36
63
63
63 63 -
63
63
31
28
27
27 -
25
17
Entrenchment Rat
3.2
3.1
3.2 3.4 -
3.2
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7 3.6 -
3.8
3.7
6.2
6.2
6.2 6.5 -
6.6
6.2
3.6
3.7
3.7
4.0 -
3.8
3.1
Bank Height Ratic
1.0
1.2
0.9 0.8 -
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.0 0.9 -
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9 0.9 -
0.9
0.8
1.0
1.2
0.9
0.9 -
0.9
0.9
Wetted Perknaer(it)
78
79
7.0 6.1 -
6.4
52
11.8
11.0
10.9 10.2 -
97
99
12.2
11.4
11.1 10.3 -
10.1
10.7
97
7.8
7.7
7$ -
6.7
5.7
Hydraulic Radius (it)
0.5
0.5
0.4 0.4 -
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.5
0.5 0.5 -
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.7 0.8 -
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4 -
0.3
0.2
d50 ( n)
Stream Reach
Reach 2 downsttwatn (1,423 LF)
Cross-section X-8 1
Cross-section X-9 1
Crow-sectiov X-10 '
Based on Dxed baseline bankfoll elevation
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
BF Width (it)
153
16.1
16.1 16.1 -
162
17.1
145
145
14.6 15.1 -
153
16.4
103
9.3
9.1 8.5 -
9.4
9.3
BF Mean Depth (it)
12
1.6
1.7 19 -
18
19
1.1
13
1.4 1.3 -
1$
1.6
08
0.7
0.7 0.7 -
07
0.7
Widde'Depth Rati
13.3
9.8
9.6 8.6 -
8.8
9.1
12.9
10.8
10.8 12.1 -
9.8
10.5
12.6
13.2
13.0 12.7 -
13.7
13.0
BF Cross -sectional Area (it)
17.6
26.3
27.0 30.3 -
29.9
32.1
16.3
19.5
19.7 18.9 -
23.7
25.5
8.4
6.5
6.4 5.7 -
6.4
6.7
BF Max Depth (it)
2.7
2.6
28 27 -
3$
3.0
22
32
3$ 29 -
3.4
35
12
1.1
1.1 1$ -
1.1
1.1
Width d Floodpmne Area(it)
53
52
53 53 -
53
54
71
71
71 71 -
71
71
74
74
74 75 -
75
75
En deeteet Rau
-
-
- - -
-
-
-
-
- - -
-
-
7.2
7.3
7.3 8.8 -
8.0
8.0
Bank Height Rau
-
-
- - -
-
-
-
-
- - -
-
-
1.0
1.0
0.9 0.9 -
0.9
0.9
Wetted Per'unaer(tt)
17B
193
195 183 -
185
195
IBS
172
173 17D -
182
19$
119
107
105 8.9 -
97
9.7
Hydraulic Radios(ft)
1.0
1.4
1.4 1.7 -
1B
1B
I$
1.1
1.1 1.1 -
13
13
0.7
0B
0B 0B -
07
0.7
d50 (run)
Note: Pe I)MS Trequest, the bank heightratio for MY7 has beenwlculmM using the bankfell elevation. determined 6omthe. Wilt bmkfall area. Another value werewlwUted using the origirul. Wilt bmkfull elevation,. w. done for previous nwni-g reports.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (CMS PROJECT NO. M 96074)

Table lla. (Continued) Cross Section Morphology and HydraWic Monitoring St .....y
Thomas Creek Restoration P-j- DMS Project ID No. 96074
S- Reach
Reach 1 (208 LF)
Reach 6 (1,776 LF)
Cross-section X-11 (Pool)
Cross-section X-12 (RiflU)
Cross-section X-13 (Riffle)
Bawd,,Bxedbasdm,bankFullelevation
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Basc
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
BE Width (it)
162
15.4
148
16.3 -
16.1
8.7
13.9
12.7
12.4
13.1 -
12.4
12.4
63
4.1
4.1
3.7 -
4.2
4.4
BF Mean Depth (it)
1.5
1.7
1.7
2.1 -
2.2
2.2
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.6 -
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2 -
0.3
0.1
Width7Depth RdR,
11.1
8.8
8.7
7.7 -
7A
3.9
17.4
19.8
16.5
22.3 -
20.9
22.6
18.7
16.1
19.5
15.5 -
13.8
31.3
BF Cross -sectional Area (ha)
23.7
26.8
25.0
34.6 -
34.8
19.0
11.1
8.2
9.3
7.7 -
7.4
6.8
2.1
1.1
0.8
0.9 -
1.3
0.6
BF Max Depth (it)
3.4
3.8
3.5
4.1 -
3.8
3.9
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.0 -
1.0
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4 -
0.4
0.4
Width dFloodpmne At. (it)
69
69
69
69 -
42
70
31
30
31
29 -
29
28
19
18
16
17 -
16
16
Entre d-t R d
-
-
-
- -
-
-
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.2 -
2.4
2.3
3.1
3.2
3.2
4.5 -
3.9
3.7
Bank Height Rau
-
-
-
- -
-
-
1.0
1.2
1.1
0.9 -
0.9
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.7 -
0.8
0.7
Wetted Pe Irrt r (it)
19.2
18.9
18.1
23.6 -
19.9
10.2
15.5
14.0
13.9
13.6 -
12.8
12.8
6.9
4.6
4.5
3.8 -
4.3
4.7
Hydraulic Radius (It)
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.5 -
1.7
L9
0.7
0.6
0.7
h6 -
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2 -
0.3
0.1
d50 (rrun)
Stream Reach
Reach 5 (1,168 LF)
Cross-section X-14 Rif k
Cross-section X-15 1
Cross-section X-16 1
Based onF ed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY7
BF Width (it)
7.5
6.9
7.2
6.4 -
5.8
5.8
10.3
7.3
6.4
9.5 -
6.9
6.5
9.3
8.7
8.5
8.9 -
9.0
10.3
BF Mean Depth (it)
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.5 -
0.6
0.5
0.8
1.0
1.0
0.9 -
1.0
0.9
0.8
1.2
1.2
1.2 -
1.1
1.0
Width7Depth Rau
8.4
10.8
13.5
11.6 -
10.3
12.4
13.8
7.1
6.2
10.4 -
6.7
7.4
11.9
7.3
7.0
7.4 -
8.1
10.7
BE Cross -sectional Area (ha)
6.8
4.4
3.8
3.5 -
3.3
2.7
7.7
7.5
6.5
8.7 -
7.0
5.7
7.3
10.4
10.2
10.6 -
10.1
10.0
BF Max Depth(it)
12
12
1.0
1.1 -
1.0
08
15
IS
IS
18 -
IS
1.5
13
27
2.5
28 -
22
22
Width dFloodprone At. (it)
50
50
50
50 -
50
48
60
59
60
59 -
60
60
69
67
67
67 -
55
64
Entrenchment Rtk
6.6
6.6
6.6
7.8 -
8.5
8.2
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
B.a 116ght Rtk
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8 -
0.9
0.8
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
WetredPerknaer(h)
93
8.1
78
69 -
63
6.1
118
93
8.4
10.5 -
79
72
10.9
11.1
10.9
11.1 -
11.1
11.8
Hydraulic Radius (it)
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5 -
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8 -
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.9
1.0 -
0.9
0.8
150 (rrun)
Note: Pe DMS Trequest, the bank heightratio for MY7 has beenwlculmM using the bankfull elevation as determined 6om the.Wilt bankfull area. Another value werewlwUted using the origirul.Wilt b Ifull elevation, as was done for previous nwni-g reports.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. M 96074)

Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach 1 (298 LF)
Parameter
MY-2
MY-3
MY-7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Min
Mean Med Max SO
n Min Mean Med Max SO
n Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SO
n
Min Mean Med Max SO
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
BE Width (It)
-----
13.9 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 12.7 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 12.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 13.1 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 12.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 12.4 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Mean Depth (ft)
-----
0.8 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 0.7 ----
0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
I
Width/Depth Ratio
-----
17.4 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 19.8 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 16.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 22.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 20.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 22.6 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Cross -sectional Area (ft2)
-----
11.1 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 8.2 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 9.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 7.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 7.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 6.8 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Max Depth (ft)
-----
1.1 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 1.1 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 1.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 1.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 1.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
-----
30.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 30.0 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 31.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 29.1 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 29.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 28.2 ----- ----- -----
I
Entrenchment Ratio
-----
2.2 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 2.2 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 2.1 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 2.2 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 2.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 2.3 ----- ----- -----
I
Bank Height Ratio
-----
1.0 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 1.2 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 1.1 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
I
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
--
----- --- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -------------- -----
-
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolLength (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolSpacing (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (it)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Wavelength (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Width Ratio
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Additional Reach Parameters
DrainageArea (SM)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
RosgenClassification
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEVelocity (fps)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEDischarge (cfs)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ValleyLength
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelThalweg Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Sinuosity(ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
WaterSurface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEslope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelStability or Habitat Metric
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Biologicalor Other
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -----
----- -----
-----I
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Note: Per DMS/IRT request the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the hankfull elevation w detern fined from the as built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original w-built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous monitoring re"is.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach 2 upstream (703 LF)
Parameter
OR MY-3
MY-7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Min
Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
It
Min Mean Med Max SD
It
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
BE Width (It)
----
10.4 ----- ----- -----
-----
---- 9.8 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 9.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 10.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 9.5 ----- ----- -----
1
9.7 ----- ----- -----
I
BE Mean Depth (ft)
----
0.7 ----- ----- -----
-----
---- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
1
0.5 ----- ----- -----
I
Width/Depth Ratio
----
14.8 ----- ----- -----
-----
---- 16.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 16.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 21.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 18.4 ----- ----- -----
1
----- 19.4 ----- ----- -----
I
BE Cross -sectional Area (W)
----
7.4 ----- ----- -----
-----
---- 5.8 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 5.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 4.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 4.9 ----- ----- -----
1
4.8 ----- ----- -----
I
BE Max Depth (ft)
----
1.0 ----- ----- -----
-----
---- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
1
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
----
38.2 ----- ----- -----
-----
---- 37.0 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 36.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 35.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 36.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 35.6 ----- ----- -----
I
Entrenchment Ratio
----
3.7 ----- ----- -----
-----
---- 3.7 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 3.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.7 ----- ----- -----
I
Bank Height Ratio
----
1.0 ----- ----- -----
-----
0.9 ----- ----- -----
----
----- 1.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.7 ----- ----- -----
I
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Radius of Curvature (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Wavelength (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Width Ratio -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Additional Reach Parameters
DrainageArea (S7
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
RosgenClassification
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEVelocity (fps)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEDischarge (cfs)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ValleyLength
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelThalweg Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Sinuosity(ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
WaterSurface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEslope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelStability or Habitat Metric
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Biologicalor Other
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -----
----- -----
-----I
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Note: Per DMS/IRT request the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from the as built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original w-built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous monitoring retorts.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach 2 downstream (1,423 LF)
Parameter
Baseline is
off
MY-1
MY-2
MY-3
MY-5
MY-7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
BE Width (ft)
10.2
10.2
----- 10.3 -----
2
9.3
9.5
----- 9.7 -----
2
9.1
9.3
----- 9.5 -----
2
8.5
9.1
----- 9.7 -----
2
9.4
9.4
----- 9.4 -----
2
----- 6.5 ----- ----- -----
2
BE Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
----- 1.0 -----
2
0.7
0.8
----- 0.9 -----
2
0.7
0.8
----- 0.8 -----
2
0.7
0.8
----- 0.8 -----
2
0.7
0.7
----- 0.7 -----
2
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
2
Width/Depth Ratio
10.1
11.4
----- 12.6 -----
2
11.4
12.3
----- 13.2 -----
2
11.7
12.4
----- 13.0 -----
2
11.6
12.2
----- 12.7 -----
2
0.9
0.9
----- 0.9 -----
2
----- 8.5 ----- ----- -----
2
BE Cross -sectional Area (ft2)
8.4
9.3
----- 10.2 -----
2
6.5
7.4
----- 8.3 -----
2
6.4
7.1
----- 7.7 -----
2
5.7
6.9
----- 8.0 -----
2
6.4
6.4
----- 6.4 -----
2
----- 4.9 ----- ----- -----
2
BE Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.3
----- 1.5 -----
2
1.1
1.2
----- 1.3 -----
2
1.1
1.2
----- 1.3 -----
2
1.0
1.1
----- 1.2 -----
2
1.1
1.1
----- 1.1 -----
2
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
2
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
62.9
68.7
----- 74.5 -----
2
62.9
68.7
----- 74.5 -----
2
63.0
68.7
----- 74.5 -----
2
62.9
68.7
----- 74.5 -----
2
62.9
62.9
----- 62.9 -----
2
----- 45.9 ----- ----- -----
2
Entrenchment Ratio
6.2
6.7
----- 7.2 -----
2
6.2
6.8
----- 7.3 -----
2
6.2
6.8
----- 7.3 -----
2
6.5
7.7
----- 8.8 -----
2
6.6
6.6
----- 6.6 -----
2
----- 4.7 ----- ----- -----
2
Bank Height Ratio
0.9
1.0
----- 1.0 -----
2
0.9
1.0
----- 1.0 -----
2
0.9
0.9
----- 0.9 -----
2
0.9
0.9
----- 0.9 -----
2
0.9
0.9
----- 0.9 -----
2
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
2
Profile
Riffle Lengt](ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Riffle Slope
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Lengt
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Spacin
-----
------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PoolMax Dept
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pattern
Channel Bellwidth (ft) -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Radius of Curvature (ft) -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Wavelength (ft) -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Width Ratio -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Additional Reach Parameters
DrainageArea (S7U
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
RosgenClassification
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEVelocity (fps)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEDischarge (cfs)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ValleyLength
-----
-----
----- ----- ----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelThalweg Length (ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Sinuosity(ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
WaterSurface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEslope (ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelStability or Habitat Metric
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Biologicalor Other
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
-----I
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Note: Per DMS/IRT request the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation w determined from the w-built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous monitoring reports.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach 3 (1,031 LF)
Parameter
nny
MY-1
MY-2
MY-3
MY-5
MY-7
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
BE Width (ft) 7.5
8.4
----- 9.3 -----
2
7.1
7.9
----- 8.8 -----
2
7.0
7.7
----- 8.3 -----
2
7.4
8.0
----- 8.6 -----
2
6.5
7.6
----- 8.7 -----
2
----- 8.1 ----- ----- -----
2
BE Mean Depth (ft) 0.6
0.7
----- 0.8 -----
2
0.4
0.5
----- 0.6 -----
2
0.5
0.5
----- 0.6 -----
2
0.3
0.5
----- 0.6 -----
2
0.4
0.5
----- 0.6 -----
2
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
2
Width/Depth Ratio 11.9
12.1
----- 12.3 -----
2
14.1
15.5
----- 16.9 -----
2
13.7
14.6
----- 15.5 -----
2
14.4
17.9
----- 21.3 -----
2
15.1
16.0
----- 16.9 -----
2
----- 16.2 ----- ----- -----
2
BE Cross -sectional Area (ft2) 4.5
5.9
----- 7.3 -----
2
3.0
4.2
----- 5.4 -----
2
3.1
4.1
----- 5.1 -----
2
2.6
3.9
----- 5.1 -----
2
2.5
3.8
----- 5.1 -----
2
----- 4.2 ----- ----- -----
2
BE Max Depth (ft) 0.9
1.1
----- 1.3 -----
2
0.7
0.9
----- 1.1 -----
2
0.7
0.8
----- 1.0 -----
2
0.7
0.9
----- 1.0 -----
2
0.8
0.9
----- 1.0 -----
2
----- 1.0 ----- ----- -----
2
Width of Floodpmne Area (ft) 37.3
46.3
----- 55.3 -----
2
34.1
43.0
----- 51.8 -----
2
34.1
42.8
----- 51.4 -----
2
33.8
42.3
----- 50.7 -----
2
37.0
44.0
----- 51.0 -----
2
----- 43.4 ----- ----- -----
2
Entrenchment Ratio 5.0
5.5
----- 5.9 -----
2
4.9
5.5
----- 6.0 -----
2
5.0
5.6
----- 6.1 -----
2
4.5
5.2
----- 5.9 -----
2
5.7
5.8
----- 5.9 -----
2
----- 5.3 ----- ----- -----
2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
----- 1.0 -----
2
0.9
0.9
----- 0.9 -----
2
0.8
0.8
----- 0.8 -----
2
0.7
0.8
----- 0.9 -----
2
0.8
0.9
----- 0.9 -----
2
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
2
Profile
RiffleLength (ft)
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolLength (ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolSpacing (ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolMax Depth (ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Radius of Curvature (ft) -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Wavelength (ft) -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Width Ratio -----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
Additional Reach Parameters
DrainageArea (SM)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Risgen Classification
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEVelocity (fps)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEDischarge (cfs)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ValleyLength
-----
-----
----- ----- ----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelThalweg Length (ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Sinuosity(ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
WaterSurface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEslope (ft/ft)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
---------- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelStability or Habitat Metric
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Biologicalor Other
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
-----I
-----
-----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Note: Per DMS/IRT request the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from the as Wilt bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous monitoring reports.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach 4 (1,238 LF)
Parameter
Baseline
MY-1
MY-2
MY-3
MY-7
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Min
Mean Med Max SD n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SO
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
BE Width (ft) -----
6.8 ----- ----- ----- -----
6.8 ----- ----- -----
----- 6.1 ----- -----
I
5.9
I
6.0
I
4.8
1
BE Mean Depth (ft) -----
0.5
0.5
----- 0.5
I
0.4 -----
I
----- 0.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.4 ----- ----- -----
I
Width/Depth Ratio -----
12.7 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 12.6 ----- -----
----- 13.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 14.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 15.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 12.0 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Cross -sectional Area (W) -----
3.6 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 3.6 ----- -----
----- 2.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 2.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 2.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 1.9 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Max Depth (ft) -----
0.9 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 1.0 ----- -----
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
I
Width of Floodprone Area (ft) -----
21.9 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 22.3 ----- ---
----- 20.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 20.2 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 21.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 18.5 ----- ----- -----
I
Entrenchment Ratio -----
3.2 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 3.1 ----- ---
----- 3.2 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.2 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.8 ----- ----- -----
I
Bank Height Ratio -----
1.0 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 1.2 ----- ---
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ---
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----------
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
RiffleSlope (ft/ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ---
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Length (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
---------- ----- --
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolSpacing (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolMax Depth (It) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfullwidth (ft/ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters
DrainageArea (SM)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
RosgenClassification
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEVelocity (fps)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEDischarge (cfs)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ValleyLength
-----
----- ----- ----- ---- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelThalweg Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Sinuosity(ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
WaterSurface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEslope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelStability or Habitat Metric
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Biologicalor Other
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
-----I
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Note: Per DMS/IRT request the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the hankfull elevation w detern fined from the as built bankfull area. AU other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous monitoring re"N.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach 5 (1,169 LF)
Parameter
Base'
MY-1
MY-2
MY-3
MY-5
MY-7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
BE Width (ft)
-----
7.5 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 6.9 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 7.2 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 6.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 5.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 5.8 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Mean Depth (ft)
-----
0.9 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
I
Width/Depth Ratio
-----
8.4 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 10.8 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 13.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 11.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 10.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 12.4 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Cross -sectional Area (W)
-----
6.8 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 4.4 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 3.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 2.7 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Max Depth (ft)
-----
1.2 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 1.2 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 1.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 1.1 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 1.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
-----
49.9 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 49.9 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 49.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 49.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 49.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 47.7 ----- ----- -----
I
Entrenchment Ratio
-----
6.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 6.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 6.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 7.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 8.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 8.2 ----- ----- -----
I
Bank Height Ratio
-----
1.0 ----- ----- -----
----
----- 1.0 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Length (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Spacing (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Max Depth (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pattern
Channel Bellwidth (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Radius of Curvature (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Wavelength (fl) -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Width Ratio -----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Additional Reach Parameters
hL
AN
DrainageArea (SM)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
RosgenClassification
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEVelocity (fps)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEDischarge (cfs)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ValleyLength
-----
----- ----- ----- ----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelThalweg Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Sinuosity(ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
WaterSurface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEslope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelStability or Habitat Metric
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Biologicalor Other
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -----
----- -----
-----I
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Note: Per DMS/IRT request the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the hankfull elevation w detern fined from the as built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous monitoring retorts.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach 6 (1,776 LF)
Parameter
aseline
MY-1
MY-2
MY-3
MY-7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean Med Max SD n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
BF Width (It)
-----
6.3 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 4.1 ----- ----- ---
----- 4.1 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 4.2 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 4.4 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Mean Depth (ft)
-----
0.3 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 0.3 ----- ----- ----
----- 0.2 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.2 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.1 ----- ----- -----
I
Width/Depth Ratio
-----
18.7 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 16.1 ----- ----- -----
----- 19.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 15.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 13.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 31.3 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Cross -sectional Area (ft2)
-----
2.1 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 1.1 ----- ----- -----
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 1.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Max Depth (ft)
-----
0.6 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
----- 0.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.4 ----- ----- -----
I
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
-----
19.4 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 17.6 ----- ----- -----
----- 16.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 16.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 16.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 16.4 ----- ----- -----
I
Entrenchment Ratio
-----
3.1 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 3.2 ----- ----- -----
----- 3.2 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 4.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.7 ----- ----- -----
I
Bank Height Ratio
-----
0.8 ----- ----- ----- -----
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
-- 0.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.7 ----- ----- -----
I
Profile
RiffleLength (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
RiffleSlope (ft/ft)
----- -----
----- ----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolLength (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolSpacing (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
PoolMax Depth (It)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pattern
Channel Bellwidth (it) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfullwidth (ft/ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters
DrainageArea (S7U
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
RosgenClassification
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BFVelocity (fps)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BFDischarge (cfs)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ValleyLength
-----
----- ----- ----- ---- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelThalweg Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Sinuosity(ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
WaterSurface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BFslope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelStability or Habitat Metric
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Biologicalor Other
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
-----I
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Note: Per DMS/IRT request the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the hankfull elevation w detern fined from the as built bankfull area. AU other values were calculated using the original as -built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous monitoring re"N.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Reach Tl (227 LF)
Parameter
OF MY-3
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Min
Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
BE Width (it)
-----
8.5 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 6.8 ----- ----- -----
----- ----- 6.9 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 6.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 6.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 5.6 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Mean Depth (ft)
-----
0.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
----- ----- 0.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.4 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.2 ----- ----- -----
I
Width/Depth Ratio
-----
13.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 13.8 ----- ----- -----
----- ----- 16.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 15.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 18.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 27.4 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Cross -sectional Area (W)
-----
5.3 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 3.4 ----- ----- -----
----- ----- 3.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 2.3 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 1.2 ----- ----- -----
I
BF Max Depth (ft)
-----
0.9 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 0.8 ----- ----- -----
----- ----- 0.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.6 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.5 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 0.3 ----- ----- -----
I
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
-----
30.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 28.2 ----- ----- -----
----- ----- 27.1 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 26.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 25.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 17.0 ----- ----- -----
I
Entrenchment Ratio
-----
3.6 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 3.7 ----- ----- -----
----- ----- 3.7 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 4.0 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.8 ----- ----- -----
I
----- 3.1 ----- ----- -----
I
Height Ratio-----
1.0 ----- ----- -----
-----
----- 1.2 ----- ----- -----
----- ----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
----- 0.9 ----- ---- -----
----- ---Bank
.
----- 0.9 ----- ----- -----
I
Profile
Riffle Length (it)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ---------- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ---------- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Wavelength (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Meander Width Ratio
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
RosgenClassification
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
--
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BF Velocity (fps)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----------
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEDischarge (cfs)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----------
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ValleyLength
-----
----- ----- ----- ----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----------
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----------
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Sinuosity (ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
WaterSurface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----------
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BEslope (ft/ft)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
BankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----------
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
ChannelStability or Habitat Metric
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
----- -----
-----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Biologicalor Other
-----
----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----I
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
Note: Per DMSART request the bank height ratio for MY7 has been calculated using the bankfull elevation as determined from the as built bankfull area. All other values were calculated using the original w-built bankfull elevation, as was done for previous monitoring re"is.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Figure 8. Flow Gauge Graphs
Thomas Creek Daily Rain
1/1/2022
2/15/2022 4/1/2022
5/16/2022 6/30/2022 8/14/2022 9/28/2022 11/12/2022 12/27/2022
0.0
�v
C
1.0
IX
T
2.0
p
3.0
Thomas Creek Reach 2
In -Channel Flow Gauge TMCK FL1
2.00
1.90
—TMCK FL1
1.80
Year 7 Maximum Flow
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS OF
1.70
Measurement = 1.20' on
FLOW - 271* 0.02 feet (0.25 inches)
1.60
1/3/22
(1/1/22 - 9/28/22)
1.50
w
1.40
1.30
O.
1.20
0
1.10
i
:+
1.00
0.90
?�
0.80
y
0.70
0.60
w
7
0.50
N
0.40
i
0.30
PF1 r
0.20
0.10
0.00
1/1/2022 4/1/2022
6/30/2022 9/28/2022 12/27/2022
Date
Surface water flow is estimated to have occurred when the pressure transducer reading is equal to or above 0.02 feet (0.25 inches) in depth.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DIMS PROJECT NO. 96074)

Figure 8. Flow Gauge Graphs
Thomas Creek Daily Rain
1/1/2022
2/15/2022 4/1/2022
5/16/2022 6/30/2022 8/14/2022 9/28/2022 11/12/2022 12/27/2022
0.0
iv
C
1.0
IX
T
2.0
Q
3.0
Thomas Creek Reach 5
In -Channel Flow Gauge TMCK FL2
2.20
2.10
Year 7 Maximum
Flow
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS OF
-TMCK FL2
2.00
Measurement =
1.65' on
FLOW - 166*
1.90
5/24/22
(1/1/22 - 6/15/22)
0.02 feet (0.25 inches)
1.80
1.70
^•
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.30
C
1.20
Q
1.10
1.00
0.90
y
0.80
i
0.70
7
0.60
N
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1 /1 /2022
41112022
6/30/2022 9/28/2022 12/27/2022
Date
* Surface water flow is estimated to have occurred when the pressure transducer reading is equal to or above 0.02 feet (0.25 inches) in depth.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DIMS PROJECT NO. 96074)

Figure 8. Cont.
"
•
•
1
•
'
-�I�
Iww�w
w�wl■
•'
-�I�
Iww�w
w�■II■1■
�
'
-�I�
Iww�w
w�■II■I■w■wwwwwww■�
'
-�I�
Iww�w
w■�RIIlI
■w■wwwwwww■�
'
�w�l�lww�w
w■■Iwwwllll■I■w■■wwlwwlww■�
'
�wwww■I�Iw■www■■■■w■
■■■■Iwwl■■R�Il�rl■w■wwwlwin■�
'
�wwww■■I�
Iw■www■■■inwlw�n■e■Iwwl■■RIuI
■w■■wwwlwuw�
"
�wwwllw■■I�
Iwn■ww■■■■ulwuw�wll�nlww■n,t■R
ii�l uw■w■w■Iwlw�
• '•
ww■wwwwllw■■Ian■II■ww■■■■ulm■ilw�wr,'�'lIR■■lll■llIIII
ww■wwwwwllw■■I�
Ilmr■ww■■■■n111P■II■I�wlll■Yllill■w■Illloin
uw■■wwwl�■lw�
111I Ilw■■wwlwwll■IRII�
.�
ww■wl■wwlln■■u■w■ww■Ilinleww■■■■Irlul■l■ism
wwl■■■imw
liiiniiinlwm
lliiiiiiim
lll■nllrollri■i�uur■■■u7771111.I,1,111
■■ulw
Rill
Frill
ii nw■■iwwwll■luuww■
In■■■i■n■wlnul■IIIRw■www
•
•
ww■�nnlgl■umlfl'".,
�I wljei
ir�� nw■�,IIll�rfw�iii■I�wiww�
,:.,ram^aul■ui�
villir"?I
'IFIII■�Irm.,11'lvmlllill■Rli
..�r��llr
■Ilill,�,��1
���iwiliiiw�■4�ni4r���ii�,
^ ■Inllri
III vISlw�nuiol■■r8ii
. l w■w■Ilnn ins■Illrrl�i�ww■uw,,
�'ii�i�1°�l��ii �'n+�iii�I�u���i
WiiW141J,u ?MVInITIII I �'lluu'irm1111M■�
,,, ��f��,r. �,^ ,.,,. w�iew■
lii�■���ii��y�■a=lurl�i��autl ' a
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96074)

Figure 9.Observed Rainfall Versus Historic Averages
10.0
8.0
6.0
0
4.0
U
a
2.0
0.0
Thomas Creek Restoration Project MY7
Observed Rainfall versus Historic Averages
ooll
I
`
AL
%
`
I
� I
I
Wake County Historic Average (44.5 in) Historic 30% Probable (29.1 in)
--*—Historic 70% Probable (53.3 in) --■-- Observed Project Rainfall (24.8 in)
Note: Historic average annual rainfall for Wake County is 44.53", while the observed project rainfall recorded a total of 24.8" over the
previous 12 months (from 11/1/2021 to 10/31/2022). Project rainfall data was collected from the NC-CRONOS station LAKE.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK STORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96074)

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Date of Data
Collection
Reach 2 Crest
Gauge (feet)
Estimated Occurrence of Bankfull Event
Method of Data Collection
Year 1 Monitoring (2016)
10/27/2016
1.1
10/8/2016 (Hurricane Matthew)
Crest Gauge, Flow Gauge
Year 2 Monitoring (2017)
5/2/2017
0.21
4/25/2017 (3.2" rain event)
Crest Gauge, Flow Gauge
Year 3 Monitoring (2018)
4/23/2018
0.97
4/15/2018 (1.8" rain event)
Crest Gauge, Flow Gauge
10/10/2018
1.49
9/15-17/2018 (6.1" from Hurricane Florence)
Crest Gauge, Flow Gauge
Year 4 Monitoring (2019)
4/25/2019
0.89
4/19/2019 (0.71" rain event)
Crest Gauge, Flow Gauge
Year 5 Monitoring (2020)
2/21/2020
0.98
2/6/20 (3.1" rain event)
Crest Gauge, Flow Gauge
Year 6 Monitoring (2021)
8/10/2021
0.62
7/8/21 (2.93" rain event)
Crest Gauge, Flow Gauge
Year 7 Monitoring (2022)
3/25/2022
0.67
1/3/22 (1.23" rain event)
Crest Gauge, Flow Gauge
Note: Crest gauge readings can be corroborated with associated spikes in the flow gauge reading graphs (see Appendix E).
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)

Table 13. Flow Gauge Success
Thomas Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96074
Flow Gauge ID
Most Consecutive Days Meeting Criterial
Cumulative Days Meeting CriteriaZ
Year 1
(2016)
Year 2
(2017)
Year 3
(2018)
Year 4
(2019)
Year 5
(2020)
Year 6
(2021)
Year 7
(2022)
Year 1
(2016)
Year 2
(2017)
Year 3
(2018)
Year 4
(2019)
Year 5
(2020)
Year 6
(2021)
Year 7
(2022)
Reach 2 Flow Gauge #1 (Installed March 30, 2016)
TCFL1
229
248
357
179
129*
279
271
229
248
357
240
129*
279
290
Reach 5 Flow Gauge #2 (Installed March 30, 2016)
TCFL2
126
138
82
94
295
224
166
182
218
204
191
295
272
230
Notes:
* Flow Gauge #1 failed on 5/8/20 and was replaced on 12/18/20
'Indicates the single greatest number of consecutive days within the monitoring year where flow was measured.
Indicates the total number of days within the monitoring year where flow was measured.
Success Criteria: A restored stream reach will be considered at least intermittent when the flow duration occurs for a minimum of 30 consecutive days during the
monitoring year.
Surface water flow is estimated to have occurred when the pressure transducer reading is equal to or above 0.02 feet (0.25 inches) in depth.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
YEAR 7 MONITORING/CLOSEOUT REPORT
THOMAS CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96074)