20190159 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2022_20230207

ID#* 20190159
Select Reviewer:
Ryan Hamilton
Initial Review Completed Date 02/15/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 2/7/2023
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
ID#:* 20190159
Existing ID#
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Strawberry Hill Mitigation Site
County: Johnston
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: StrawberryHill_100094_MY1_2022.pdf 22.3MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature: *

(MY1) FINAL MONITORING REPORT - Stream Mitization
STRAWBERRY HILL MITIGATION PROJECT
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
NCDMS Project #100094
DMS Contract #7745
RFP: 16-007576
USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-00124 I DWR Project 92019-0159
Provided by:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
for Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
February 2023

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BiSER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
January 31, 2023
Matt Deangelo
RES
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Via email: [e-mail]
Subject: DMS Comments on the MY Report
Strawberry Hill, Project ID 9100094, DMS Contract 7745
Matt,
DMS received the MY draft report on 1/26/2023 and visited the site on 6/9/22 as part of the as -built review. DMS offers
the following comments for the report:
Stream Report
1. Section 1.5.2 (1st paragraph) seems to have mixed up the flow gauge location and stage recorder location in the
discussion. The stage recorder is identified as being on JH1-A and flow gauge on JH1-B when it should be the
opposite. Please correct.
2. Please remove Section 1.5.4 from the stream report since it exclusively deals with the buffer -only section of the
project.
3. Recommend removing Figure 2b from the stream report.
4. In Appendix A, please remove any photos from the buffer -only easement from the stream report.
5. On Flow Gauge JH1-A hydrograph, recommend adding number of days of flow after the date range, i.e.,
2/16/2022 - 4/4/2022 (47 days).
Buffer Report
6. Please update Section 1.3 with the correct riparian buffer restoration credits as reported in the MYO report. The
restoration credits should be 642,070.977 and total credits should be 650,162.286.
7. Please remove Section 1.5. We would only expect a discussion of as -built condition in the MYO Baseline report.
8. Replace/update Table 1 in Appendix A so the correct credits are displayed.
9. The veg plot field sheets located after Table 7 do not need to be included in the report.
Please incorporate the revisions and provide a response to comments letter, one (1) hardcopy, and one (1) pdf copy along
with any updated digital files that may be needed based on the comments above. If you have any questions, or wish to
discuss these comments further, please contact me at any time. I can be reached at [phone], or via email at
j eremiah.dow&ncdenr. gov
Sincerely,
Jeremiah Dow
Project Manager — Eastern Region
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
cc: Jamey McEachran, RES
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Mitigation Services
'®}Jl[ 217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
NOPTH CAFULM
aepakh & Eawl�aaa� , n \ /"� 919.707.8976

,fires
February 2, 2023
Jeremiah Dow
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 W Loop S #300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: DMS Comments on the MY1 Report Strawberry Hill, Project ID #100094, DMS Contract
7745
Listed below are comments provided by DMS on January 31, 2023 regarding the Strawberry Hill
Stream and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project Year 1 Monitoring Reports and RES' responses.
Stream Report Comments:
1. Section 1.5.2 (1st paragraph) seems to have mixed up the flow gauge location and stage recorder
location in the discussion. The stage recorder is identified as being on JH1-A and flow gauge on
JH1-B when it should be the opposite. Please correct.
This has been revised accordingly.
2. Please remove Section 1.5.4 from the stream report since it exclusively deals with the buffer -
only section of the project.
The section has been removed.
3. Recommend removing Figure 2b from the stream report.
Figure 2b was included in the report in order to satisfy a previous DMS Digital File Comment from
the MYO report (See excerpt below from the MYO Comment Response Memo):
ital File Comments:
1. It is not possible to ensure the easement is accurate when compared to the CCPV in the stream
asset baseline report, the CCPV does include the entire easement. The digital easement
submitted does represent the DMS recorded easement. A requirement of the CCPV is to
include the easement boundary, please revise the CCPV in the Stream Baseline Report to
include the entire easement boundary. It is complete in the Buffer Baseline Report.
Figure 2 has been divided into Figure 2a and 2b so that monitoring devices are legible on 2a
and the entire conservation easement is visible on 2b.
Therefore, at this time, RES prefers to include the figure per the previous comment; however, if
DMS concludes that the previous comment is erroneous, then RES can remove it in future years'
monitoring reports.
res.us

4. In Appendix A, please remove any photos from the buffer -only easement from the stream
report.
The photo pertaining to the buffer -only portion of the easement has been removed from
Appendix A.
5. On Flow Gauge JH1-A hydrograph, recommend adding number of days of flow after the date
range, i.e., 2/16/2022 - 4/4/2022 (47 days).
Number of days have been added to the hydrograph accordingly.
Buffer Report Comments:
6. Please update Section 1.3 with the correct riparian buffer restoration credits as reported in the
MYO report. The restoration credits should be 642,070.977 and total credits should be 650,162.286.
RES apologizes for the mistake. A previous version of Table 1 was accidentally copied -and -pasted
into this report. The final report has been revised to include the accurate credits and correct
version of Table 1 (also refer to comment #8 below).
7. Please remove Section 1.5. We would only expect a discussion of as -built condition in the MYO
Baseline report.
The Section has been deleted. Note that previous Section 1.6 is now Section 1.5.
8. Replace/update Table 1 in Appendix A so the correct credits are displayed
As mentioned in the above response to comment #6 above, the correct table has been included
in Appendix A of the final report.
9. The veg plot field sheets located after Table 7 do not need to be included in the report
The field sheets have been removed from Appendix B.
2

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary ...............................................
1.1
Project Location and Description .........
1.2
Project Components .............................
1.3
Project Goals and Objectives ...............
1.4
Construction and As -Built Conditions.
1.5
Monitoring Performance (MYI) ..........
1.5.1 Vegetation ....................................
1.5.2 Stream Hydrology ........................
1.5.3 Stream Geomorphology ...............
2 References.........................................................
.................................................................................. 1
.................................................................................. 1
.................................................................................. 2
.................................................................................. 3
.................................................................................. 3
.................................................................................. 3
.................................................................................. 4
.................................................................................. 4
.................................................................................. 5
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
General Site Photos
Crossing Photos
Monitoring Device Photos
Annendix B: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Planted Species Summary
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 9. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C: Stream Morphology Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Cross Section Overlay Plots
Annendix D: Hvdrolo2ic Data
Table 12. 2022 Rainfall Summary
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events
Stream Overbank and Flow Hydrographs
Flow Camera Photos
Appendix E: Proiect Timeline and Contact Information
Table 4. Project Timeline and Contact Information

I Proiect Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project ("Project") is located within a mostly rural watershed in Johnston
County near Smithfield, NC at the crossroads of Yelverton Grove Road and Brogden Road. The Project
lies within the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit
Cataloguing Unit 03020201 (Meuse 01) and 14-digit hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03020201140010, a NC
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) and the Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) sub -basin 03-04-02 (Figure 1). The Project restores 3,719 linear feet (LF) that will
provide water quality benefit for 383 acres of drainage area. Additionally, the Project restores and preserves
riparian buffer area within the project area, which provides riparian buffer credits for the Neuse 01
watershed. Conditions pertaining to the buffer mitigation component of this Project will be provided in
separate monitoring reports each year. Also, notably, the Project is in very close proximity (approximately
0.4 miles) to the RES Polecat Stream Mitigation Bank Site, offering even more functional uplift to the local
watershed.
The Project area, in whole, is comprised of a 22.12-acre easement involving two unnamed tributaries to
Polecat Branch, which eventually drains to the Neuse River. One of the tributary streams, and its associated
ditches, are not subject to stream mitigation and are only utilized for buffer mitigation. That portion of the
Project will not be discussed in this stream mitigation monitoring report but will be included in a separate
monitoring report. Therefore, the stream mitigation component of the Project involves one tributary, whose
total length prior to restoration was 3,267 LF.
The Project is accessible from both Yelverton Grove Road and Brogden Road. Coordinates for the Project
area are approximately 35.469579,-78.323896 at the NC Department of Transportation (DOT) culvert
exiting the Project at Brogden Road.
1.2 Project Components
Prior to restoration, the project stream was significantly impacted by historic relocation and straightening,
crop production, timbering, and lack of riparian buffer. Proposed improvements to the Project will help
meet the river basin needs expressed in the 2010 Neuse RBRP. Through stream restoration, the Project
presents 3,719 LF of proposed stream, generating 3,719.000 Warm Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs). The
Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits and Project Attributes are provided below in Table 1.
I able 1. btraWoerry Hill Mitigation Project jiu-luUu94) Project Mitigation Lluantltles ana Crean
Original
Mitigation Original Original Original
Plan As -Built Mitigation Restoration Mitigation
Project Segment Ft/Ac Ft/Ac Category Level Ratio (X:1) Credits
ich JHi-A
1007
1 1007
Warm
R
1.00000
1,007.000
.ch JHi-B
1054
1054
Warm
R
1.00000
1,054.000
.ch JHi-B
1658
1658
Warm
R
1.00000
1,658.000
Total:
3,719.000
Wetland Mitigation
Project Credits
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian
Non -Rip
Coastal
I Warm
I Cool
I Cold
I Wetland
Wetland
Marsh
Restoration
1 3,719.000
Totals 3,719.000
Total Stream Credit 3,719.000
Channel restoration installed log structures forgrade control and habitat,
riparian planting, installed livestakes (Stream Crossing: STA 11+64 to 12+59)
Channel restoration installed log structures forgrade control and habitat,
riparian planting, installed livestakes, (Stream Crossing: STA 23+13 to
restoration, installed log structures forgrade control and habitat,
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 1 Year 1 Monitoring Report - Stream
Project 9100094 February 2023

1.3 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction the stream had been significantly impacted by historic relocation and straightening,
crop production, timbering and lack of riparian buffer. The past land use disturbances, absence of buffer
vegetation, and current agricultural practices presented a significant opportunity for water quality and
ecosystem improvements through the implementation of this Project. Through the comprehensive analysis
of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework, specific,
attainable goals and objectives are being realized by the Project. These goals clearly help to address the
degraded water quality and nutrient input from agricultural practices that were identified as major watershed
stressors in the 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) (amended August 2018). Ultimately,
the Project supports the RBRP Goals listed in the Approved Mitigation Plan. The Project Summary Goals,
Performance, and Results are provided below in Table 2. The Project Attributes are found in Table 3.
Table 2: Summary: Goals, Performance and Results
Goal
Objective/Treatment
Likely
Performance
Measurement
Cumulative Monitoring
Functional
Criteria
Results
Uplift
Improve
Designed and
Dispersion of
Four bankfull
Stage recorder
4 BF - MYl
flood flow
constructed stream
high flows on
(BF) events and
on JHl-B, and
47 flow days - MY
attenuation on
channels sized to
the floodplain,
within
flow gauge on
site and
convey bankfull flows
increase in
monitoring
JHl-A.
downstream
that will maintain a
biogeochemical
period.
by allowing
stable dimension,
cycling within
Intermittent
for overbanks
profile, and planform
the system.
stream reaches
flows and
based on modeling,
must have 30
connection to
watershed conditions,
days of
the
and reference reach
consectutive
floodplain.
conditions.
flow.
To transport
Improved flood bank
Reduction in
Bank height
14 Cross
14/14 with BHR<1.2 - MYl
water within
connectivity by
sediment inputs
ratios remain
section
streams and
reducing bank height
from bank
below 1.2. Visual
surveys.
floodplains in
ratios and increase
erosion,
assessments
a stable, non-
entrenchment ratios.
reduction of
showing
erosive, non-
shear stress, and
progression
aggrading
improved
towards stability.
manner.
overall
hydraulic
function.
Restore and
Established and
Reduction in
Survival rate of
Seven fixed
11/11 passed - MYl
preserve
increased forested
floodplain
320 stems per
vegetation
native
riparian buffers to 50
sediment inputs
acre at MY3, 260
plots and four
floodplain
feet and greater along
from runoff,
planted stems per
random
and
both sides of the
increased bank
acre and 7 ft. tall
vegetation
streambank
channel along the
stability,
at MY5, and 210
plots (I I total
vegetation.
project reaches with a
increased LWD
stems per acre
plots).
hardwood riparian
and organic
and 10 ft. tall at
plant community.
material in
MY7.
streams,
increased.
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 2 Year 1 Monitoring Report - Stream
Project 9100094 February 2023

Table 3. Project Attribute Table
Project Name
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project
County
Johnston
Project Area (acres)
22.12
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude decimal
35.469579,-78.323896
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
65m - Rolling Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
3020201
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-02
Project Drainage Area (acres)
383 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
2%
Land Use Classification
Bottomland Forest, Cultivated, Evergreen Shrubland, Southern Yellow Pine,
Unconsolidated Sediment
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach JH1-A
Reach JH1-B
Pre -project length (feet)
901
2,336
Post -project (feet)
1,007
2,712
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined,
Unconfined
Unconfined
Drainage area (acres)
193 ac
266 ac
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Intermittent
Intermittent
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
None
None
Dominant Stream Classification (existing)
F5
F5
Dominant Stream Classification (proposed)
C5/E5
C5/E5
Dominant Evolutionary class (Simon) if applicable
II
II
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
SupportingDocs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
See PCN Approval
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
See PCN Approval
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan, Appendix L
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan, Appendix L
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
1.4 Construction and As -Built Conditions
Project construction was completed on January 20"', 2022, and planting was completed on March 7"', 2022.
The Strawberry Hill Project was built to design plans and guidelines. The record drawings are included in
within the baseline report.
There were no changes to the planting plan. However, as some high -quality tree species were found within
the cutover areas that were timbered over eight years ago, these species were left in place where feasible.
Minor monitoring device location changes were made during as -built installation, however, the quantities
remained as proposed in the Mitigation Plan.
1.5 Monitoring Performance (MY1)
The Strawberry Hill Year 1 Monitoring activities were performed in November 2022. All Monitoring data
is presented below and in the appendices. The Project is on track to meeting stream and vegetation interim
success criteria.
1.5.1 Vegetation
Monitoring of the seven permanent vegetation plots and four random vegetation plots were completed
November 16th, 2022. Vegetation data are in Appendix B, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 3 Year 1 Monitoring Report - Stream
Project 9100094 February 2023

locations are in Appendix A. MY 1 monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success
criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 324 to 809 planted stems per acre
with a mean of 578 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of twelve planted species were
documented within the plots. One volunteer species was identified in a random plot (Sambucus canadensis)
and it is expected that more volunteers will establish in upcoming years. The average stem height in the
vegetation plots was 1.5 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that herbaceous vegetation is
establishing throughout the project area.
1.5.2 Stream H. d� y
One stage recorder and one flow gauge are documenting conditions on reaches JH1-A and JH1-B,
respectively. The stage recorder is in place to document bankfull events. The flow gauge is in place to
document presence and persistence of stream flow in the intermittent channel. In addition, a camera rig
(flow camera) was installed in conjunction with the flow gauge on JH1-A in the attempt to capture daily
images of stream flow through the riffle.
The stage recorder on JH1-B recorded four bankfull events in MY1 with the highest stage occurring
on March 12t", 2022 and measuring 0.72 feet above top of bank.
The flow gauge on JH1-A recorded 13 flow events with the longest consecutive flow event lasting
47 days between February 16t", 2022 and April 4t", 2022.
o The flow camera was not installed until May 31d, 2022, therefore missing the most
significant flow event. However, since its installation, it captured daily images and
indicated several flow events, with the longest flow event lasting approximately 4 days
between July 8th, 2022 and July 12t", 2022, which is ultimately a positive indication in the
midst of a significant drought year.
Appendix E presents rainfall and stream hydrology data, including tables, hydrographs, and flow camera
photos. Gauge locations can be found on Figure 2 and photos are in Appendix A.
1.5.3 Stream Geomorphology
Cross section setup and geomorphology data collection for MY was collected on November 16t", 2022.
Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix C. Overall, there is very little change in cross
sections, and they match the proposed design. MY1 conditions show that shear stress and velocities have
been reduced for all restoration reaches. All reaches were designed as gravel bed channels and remain
classified as gravel bed channels post -construction.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation (Appendix Q. Since Project
construction, a suspected beaver dam has formed offsite, somewhere downstream of reach JH1-B and
Brogden Road. This is causing some water to back up within the JH1-B channel near the road; however,
most of the water is still contained within the channel and not causing any real inundation in the floodplain
at this time. RES will continue to monitor the effect, but the suspected dam is offsite and not within the
property of the Project's landowner.
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 4 Year 1 Monitoring Report - Stream
Project 9100094 February 2023

2 References
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. "CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level." Version 4.2
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). "Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities
2010. Amended August 2018."
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998). "A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure." Castanea 63:262-274
Resource Environmental Solutions (2020). "Strawberry Hill Final Mitigation Plan".
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2016). "Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update." NC: Interagency Review Team (IRT).
Strawberry Hill Mitigation Project 5 Year 1 Monitoring Report - Stream
Project 9100094 February 2023

Appendix A
Visual Assessment Data

1
I
�a
�o
QGreen Chapel Missionary o
Baptist Church
8roy n
,wt
Stevens Sausage Co., Inc
z—
ham
4%
x
8�� n
en Rd
Project Coordintates:
35.469579,-78.323896
o I
Chapel Hill 401
Raleigh
o
Leqend Strawberry Hill
Mitigation Project
Strawberry Hill Easement
Polecat Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin - 03020201 GcId
TLW - 03020201140010
a
" Figure 1 - Site Location Map Date: 3/8/2022
w _ - F Strawberry Hill Drawn by: MDD res
49W 0 500
s 1,000 Mitigation Project Checked by: JRM -101 inch = 1,000 feet
Feet Johnston County, North Carolina
I
�a
�o
QGreen Chapel Missionary o
Baptist Church
8roy n
,wt
Stevens Sausage Co., Inc
z—
ham
4%
x
8�� n
en Rd
Project Coordintates:
35.469579,-78.323896
o I
Chapel Hill 401
Raleigh
o
Leqend Strawberry Hill
Mitigation Project
Strawberry Hill Easement
Polecat Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin - 03020201 GcId
TLW - 03020201140010
a
" Figure 1 - Site Location Map Date: 3/8/2022
w _ - F Strawberry Hill Drawn by: MDD res
49W 0 500
s 1,000 Mitigation Project Checked by: JRM -101 inch = 1,000 feet
Feet Johnston County, North Carolina

Vegetation Condition Assessment
Target Community
a Present Marginal Absent
a
Ln
i Absent No Fill
R
= Present
I
�Pr
1
Wr
s�
ti
i
E ri, HERE, �Garmin, (c) Op LSt
N
pres
Restoring a resilient earth for a modern Lro J
5
0 100 200
Feet
Figure 2a - CCPV MY1 2022
Strawberry Hill
Mitigation Project
Johnston County,
North Carolina
Date: 1/10/2023 Drawn by: MDD
1 in = 200 feet Checked by: JRM
Legend
ORecorded Easement (22.12 ac)
Vegetation Plot
❑>320 stems/acre
■ Buffer Only
Random Vegetation Plot
23>320 stem/acre
Previous Year Random
Vegetation Plot
m Existing Wetlands
Pre-existing Top of Bank
—Surveyed Top of Bank
—Stream Structure
Cross-section
Stream Mitigation Approach
—Restoration
No Credit
— Ditch
= Swale
Stage Recorder
Flow Gauge
© Photo Location

Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach JH 1-A
Assessed Stream Length 1007
Assessed Bank Length 2014
Number
Stable,
Amount of
% Stable,
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Performing as
Ma'or Channel Category
Metric Intended
in As -built
Footage
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
°
100/o
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
Toe Erosion
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
100%
providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Tot
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
rGradecontrol,tructures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the 9 9
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
Bank Protection
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring 7 7
100%
guidance document)

Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach JH 1-B
Assessed Stream Length 2712
Assessed Bank Length 5424
Number
Stable,
Amount of
% Stable,
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Performing as
Ma'or Channel Category
Metric Intended
in As -built
Footage
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
°
100/o
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
Toe Erosion
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
100%
providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Tot
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
rGradecontrol,tructures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the 21 21
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
Bank Protection
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring 28 28
100%
guidance document)

Visual Vegetation Assessment
Planted acreage 19.73
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
Combined
Acreage
%of Planted
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1 acres
0.00
0.0%
Low Stem Density Areas*
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on current MY stem count criteria.
0.1 acres
0.19
1.0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates
To
Planted areas where average height is not meeting current MY Performance Standard. 0.25 acres
0.00
0.0%
1
Cumulative Total
0.0%
Easement Acreage 22.12
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
Invasives may occur outside of planted areas and within the easement and will therefore be calculated
against the total easement acreage- Include species with the potential to directly outcompete native, young,
Invasive Areas of Concern
woody stems in the short-term or community structure for existing communities. Species included in
1000 SF
0.00
0.0%
summation above should be identified in report summary.
Encroachment may be point, line, or polygon. Encroachment to be mapped consists of any violation o
restrictions specified in the conservation easement. Common encroachments are mowing, cattle access,
Easement Encroachment Areas
vehicular access. Encroachment has no threshold value as will need to be addressed regardless of impact
none
N/A
area.
*Note that low -stem density area only occurs in buffer mitigation -only section of Project.

Strawberry Hill General Site Photos (MY1)
JH1-A looking upstream (11/16/2022)
JH1-B looking downstream (11/16/2022)
JH1-B looking upstream (11/16/2022)

2)
Native phragmites in wetland along JH1-B (11/16/2022)
JH1-B — Looking DS from road (11/16/2022)

Strawberry Hill Crossing Photos (MY1)
Culvert at JHl-B Crossing (Entrance) (11/16/2022)
Culvert at JH1-B Crossing (Exit) (11/16/2022)

DOT Culvert at Brogden Rd. (Entrance) (11/16/2022)

Strawberry Hill Monitoring Device Photos (MYI)
Flow Camera JH1-A (11/16/2022)
Stage Recorder JH1-B (Looking Upstream) (11/16/2022)

Appendix B
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Species
%
Zone 1
%
Zone 2
Total
Planted Amount
River birch
Betula ni ra
10
10
1,600
Buttonbush
Ce halanthus occidentalis
5
5
800
Yellow poplar
Liriodendron tuli i era
10
10
1,600
Wax Myrtle
Morella ceri era
5
10
1,000
Swamp tupelo
N ssa bi ora
5
5
800
Americansycamore
Platanus occidentalis
10
10
1,600
Laurel oak
Quercus lauri olia
5
10
1,000
Overcup oak
Quercus l rata
10
10
1,600
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
10
10
1,600
Water oak
Quercus ni ra
10
10
1,600
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
10
10
1,600
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
10
0
1,000
TOTAL
15,800
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted
Stem
Height
1
607
0
607
Yes
1.3
2
567
81
647
Yes
1.7
3
607
0
607
Yes
1.4
4
647
0
647
Yes
1.5
5
809
0
809
Yes
1.3
6
567
0
567
Yes
1.4
7
526
0
526
Yes
1.3
R1
486
0
486
Yes
1.3
R2
526
0
526
Yes
1.4
R3
688
0
688
Yes
2.1
R4
324
0
324
Yes
1.6
Project Avg
578
12
585
Yes
1.5

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Strawberry Hill
Current Plot Data (MY12022)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
101038-01-0001
101038-01-0002
101038-01-0003
101038-01-0004
101038-01-0005
101038-01-0006
101038-01-0007
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
21
2
2
31
3
3
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
11
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
4
41
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
11
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
31
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
6
6
6
Quercus nigra
wateroak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
11
8
8
8
2
2
2
3
3
3
Quercus phellos
willow oak
ITree
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
Sambucus
elderberry
Shrub
2
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
5
5
5
4
4
4
1
1
1
3
3
3
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
15
15
15
14
14
16
15
15
15
16
16
16
20
20
20
14
14
14
13
13
13
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
71
71
71
71
7
81
81
81
81
81
81
8
6
61
61
61
61
6
6
6
6
607
607
607
567
567
647
607
607
607
647
647
647
809
809
809
567
567
567
5261
5261
526
Strawberry Hill
Current Plot Data (MY12022)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
R1
R2
R3
R4
MY1(2022)
MYO (2022)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
7
7
7
9
9
9
30
30
30
27
27
27
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
21
2
11
1
1
7
7
7
21
211
21
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
1
1
1
10
10
10
20
20
20
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
11
11
11
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
10
10
10
12
12
12
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
51
5
51
26
26
26
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
8
8
8
191
19
19
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
21
21
21
15
15
15
Quercus nigra
wateroak
Tree
15
15
15
26
26
26
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
25
25
25
27
27
27
Sambucus canadensis
elderberry
Shrub
2
2
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
51
51
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
221
221
22
241
24
24
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
121
121
12
13
13
13
171
171
17
81
8
8
1571
1571
159
2341
2341
237
1
1
1
1
11
11
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.27
0.27
41
41
41
51
5
51=6
61
61
41
41
41
121
121
131
121
121
14
486
486
486
526
526
526
688
688
688
324
324
324
578
578
585
861
861
872

Strawberry Hill Stream Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (MY1)
Fixed Vegetation Plot 1 (11/16/2022)
Fixed Vegetation Plot 3 (11/16/2022)
Fixed Vegetation Plot 2 (11/16/2022)
f
Tc
h
�
J
¢k
\ 1
bf
�3..
=.a t,
t
Fixed Vegetation Plot 4 (11/16/2022)

Fixed Vegetation Plot 5 (11/16/2022)
Fixed Vegetation Plot 7 (11/16/2022)
Fixed Vegetation Plot 6 (11/16/2022)

Strawberry Hill Stream Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (MY1)
Random Vegetation Plot 1 (11/16/2022)
Random Vegetation Plot 3 (11/16/2022)
Random Vegetation Plot 2 (11/16/2022)
Random Vegetation Plot 4 (11/16/2022)

Appendix C
Stream Morphology Data

Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Strawberry Hill JH1-A
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple)
Design
Monitoring Baseline (MYO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.7
9.3
9.3
11.8
2
9.6
9.6
10.1
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
12.4
14.0
14.0
15.5
2
>25
30
30
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
0.9
1.1
2
0.9
---
---
2
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.5
2
1.4
1.3
1.5
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
7.1
7.7
1 7.7
8.3
2
8.8
8.2
1 9.2
2
Width/Depth Ratio
6.3
11.6
11.6
16.9
2
10.4
---
---
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3
1.6
1.6
1.9
2
>2.2
>3.0
>3.1
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.9
2
1.0
1
1
2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
F5
C5/E5
C5/E5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.00
1.13
1.13
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Other

Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary (cont'd)
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Strawberry Hill JH1-B
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple)
Design
Monitoring Baseline (MYO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
9.5
9.5
9.6
2
9.6
8.8
11.1
5
Floodprone Width (ft)
11.6
15.9
15.9
20.2
2
>25
>30
>30
5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
2
0.9
---
---
5
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.6
2
1.4
1.4
1.6
5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
8.5
8.9
1 8.9
9.3
2
8.8
7.3
1 9.1
5
Width/Depth Ratio
9.3
10.1
10.1
10.8
2
10.4
---
---
5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
1.7
1.7
2.1
2
>2.2
>2.7
>3.4
5
Bank Height Ratio
1.7
2.0
2.0
2.3
2
1.0
1
1
5
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
F5
C5/E5
C5/E5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.01
1.14
1.14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Other

Table 11. Cross Section Moroholoav Data Table
Monitoring Data - Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Strawberry Hill/ 000•, Reaches: JHI-A and JHI-B
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
mmmmmm®
rvacea..eicnecbertne,u�..u.e .I.remmerli iild.ii.bi.�e ,lh.a air -a..uai.aaam„r.marpnai�balm..ure .1(a, � e g.)i,by e..nm�,areaa„na,.. me­e,. i,emmel,ar,e, d.

Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-A - Cross Section 1 - Pool - Restoration
140.5
139.5
c
° 138.5
w
137.5
136.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Distance (ft)
3X Vertical
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — ——Approx. Bankfull Exaggeration
Cross Section 1 (Pool
- JH1-A)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
---
---
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull' Area
---
---
Thalweg Elevation
137.24
137.23
LTOB2 Elevation
138.91
138.93
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.70
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
7.60
9.00
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfiill elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfiill elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-A - Cross Section 2 - Riffle - Restoration
141
140
° 139
......................
w
138
137
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area ......••• Low Bank Height
3X Vertical
Exaggeration
Cross Section 2 (Riffle - JH1-A)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation ft -Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
139.30
139.22
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfulll Area
1.00
1.04
Thalweg Elevation
137.98
137.97
LTOB2 Elevation
139.30
139.27
LTOB2 Max Depth ft
1.3
1.30
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
8.20
8.70
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankf ill elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-A - Cross Section 3 - Riffle - Restoration
141
140
0 139
a
w
.............
. .
-..
:...-7N*138
137
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — • Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area ......••• Low Bank Height
3X Vertical
Exa eration
Cross Section 3 (Riffle - JH1-A)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) -Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
138.85
138.88
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfulll Area
1.00
0.96
Thalweg Elevation
137.34
137.29
LTOB2 Elevation
138.85
138.82
LTOB2 Max Depth ft
1.5
1.53
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area ft2
9.20
8.60
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

140
139
0 138
a�
w
137
136
0
Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-A - Cross Section 4 - Pool - Restoration
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull
24 26 28 30
3X Vertical
Exaggeration
Cross Section 4 (Pool - J111-A)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Ban kfull Elevation ft -Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
---
---
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Ban kfuI I1 Area
---
---
Thalweg Elevation
136.57
136.71
LTOB2 Elevation
138.71
138.78
LTOB2 Max Depth ft
2.1
2.07
1
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area ft2
13.70
14.40
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
STrawberry Hill - Reach JH1-13 - Cross Section 5 - Riffle - Restoration
140
139
c
138
..
M
a�
w
137
136
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area ......••• Low Bank Height
3X Vertical
Exa eration
Cross Section 5 (Riffle - JH1-B)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
137.97
137.93
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfulll Area
1.00
0.97
Thalweg Elevation
136.42
136.38
LTOB2 Elevation
137.97
137.88
LTOB2 Max Depth ft
1.6
1.51
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
9.10
8.60
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfiill elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfiill elevation

139.5
138.5
0 137.5
a�
w
136.5
135.5
0
Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-B - Cross Section 6 - Pool - Restoration
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull
24 26 28 30
3X Vertical
Exaggeration
Cross Section 6 (Pool - J1-11-13)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankful I Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankful I1 Area
---
---
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankful I1 Area
---
---
Thalweg Elevation
135.85
135.80
LTOB2 Elevation
137.91
137.86
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.06
1
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
11.50
11.70
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-13 - Cross Section 7 - Riffle - Restoration
139.5
138.5
137.5
rr. n...........
..........
a
w
136.5
135.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area ......••• Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical
Exa eration
Cross Section 7 (Riffle - JH1-B)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation ft - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
137.52
137.52
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
0.97
Thalweg Elevation
136.12
136.12
LTOB2 Elevation
137.52
137.48
LTOB2 Max Depth ft
1.4
1.36
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
8.30
7.90
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

�>e1i
t
139
138
0 137
a�
w
136
135
0
Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-13 - Cross Section 8 - Pool - Restoration
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 8 (Pool
- J1-11-13)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
---
---
Bank Hei ht Ratio Based on AB Bankfulll Area
---
---
Thalweg Elevation
135.40
135.32
LT BZ El evati on
137.57
137.52
LTOB2 Max Depth ft
2.2
2.20
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
12.50
11.40
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-13 - Cross Section 9 - Riffle - Restoration
139
138
137Zoe
a�
..y�•.W
LW ss•.W
sv•ss• W
sv.�..W.r:;.�..
.�;.�..
�;.�..
.�;.�..
.�;.�..
.sv•ss•
ss•sv•ss
va•sv•ss
va•W
w
136
135
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Distance ft
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area ......••• Low Bank Height
3X Vertical
Exaggeration
Cross Section 9 (Riffle - J111-13)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
136.88
136.83
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfulll Area
1.00
1.03
Thalweg Elevation
135.53
135.43
LTOB2 Elevation
136.88
136.87
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.4
1.44
LTO BZ Cross SectionaI Area ft2
8.30
8.70
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

138
137
0
0
a�
136
w
135
134
0
Upstream
Downstream
STrawberry Hill - Reach JH1-B - Cross Section 10 - Pool - Restoration
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull
24 26 28 30
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 10 (Pool - J111-13)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
---
---
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfulll Area
---
---
Thalweg Elevation
134.94
134.82
LTOB2 Elevation
136.81
136.81
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.9
1.99
1
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area ft2
12.20
12.20
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-13 - Cross Section 11 - Riffle - Restoration
138
137
�-
10
............................
136
w
135
134
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area ......••• Low Bank Height
3X Vertical
Exaggeration
Cross Section
11(Riffle
- JH1-B)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
136.18
136.16
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfulll Area
1.00
1.10
Thalweg Elevation
134.81
134.87
LTOB2 Elevation
136.18
136.29
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.4
1.43
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
7.30
8.50
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

137.5
136.5
0 135.5
a�
w
134.5
133.5
0
Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-13 - Cross Section 12 - Pool - Restoration
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull
24 26 28 30
3X Vertical
Exaggeration
Cross Section 12 (Pool - J1-11-13)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation ft - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
---
---
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull' Area
---
---
Thalweg Elevation
134.35
134.27
LTOB2 El evati on
136.22
136.24
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.9
1.98
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)10.10
11.20
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

136.5
135.5
134.5
a�
w
133.5
132.5
0
Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-13 - Cross Section 13 - Pool - Restoration
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull
24 26 28 30
3X Vertical Exaggeration I
Cross Section 13 (Pool - JH1-113)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft)- Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
---
---
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull' Area
---
---
Thalweg Elevation
133.13
133.09
LTOB2 Elevation
135.07
134.92
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.9
1.83
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
9.70
8.20
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfall elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Strawberry Hill - Reach JH1-13 - Cross Section 14 - Riffle - Restoration
137
136
--
--
—
—
c
° 135
--
—
—
—
—
—
--
--
M
w
134
133
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Distance (ft)
MYO 2021 MY1 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area ......••• Low Bank Height
3X Vertical
Exaggeration
Cross Section
14 (Riffle
- JH1-B)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation ft - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
135.15
135.07
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull1 Area
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
133.64
133.59
JOB Elevation
135.15
135.08
LTOB2 Max Depth ft
1.5
1.49
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
8.30
8.30
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankf ill elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankf ill elevation

Appendix D
Hydrologic Data

Table 12. Rainfall Summary MYl 2022
Month
Average 1
Normal Limits'
2022 Project Location
Precipitation*
30 Percent
70 Percent
January
3.45
2.45
4.07
5.24
February
3.31
2.12
3.97
1.73
March
4.01
2.96
4.68
2.15
April
3.69
2.42
4.35
2.24
May
4.20
2.87
5.04
4.04
June
4.67
3.19
5.60
0.79
July
5.54
4.43
6.70
6.54
August
5.28
3.63
6.35
8.16
September
5.51
3.62
6.29
6.05
October
3.21
2.16
3.88
3.61
November
3.25
1.83
3.92
3.70
December
3.25
2.27
4.04
4.70
Total Annual **
49.37
44.67
52.62
48.94
Above Normal
Limits
Below
Normal
Limits
1 - Data according to Smithfield, NC WETS Station for 30-year period between 1991-2020
* - Project Location Precipitation is a location -weighted average of surrounding gauged data retrieved by
the USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool. Gauges used include Benson 7.5 ESE, Clayton 5.7 SSE,
Clayton 6.8 ESE, Clayton WTP, Princeton 1.3 NNE, Princeton 1.6 WSW, Selma 2.3 N, Smithfield 2.8
SE, and Smithfield
** - Total Annual represents the average total precipitation, annually, as calculated by the 30-year
period.
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events
Number of
Maximum Height
Year
Bankfull Events
Date of Maximum Bankfull Event
Above Bankfull (ft)
Stage Recorder JH1-B
MY 1
4
0.72
3/12/2022
Number of Flow
Maximum Consecutive
Maximum
Maximum
Year
Cumulative Flow
Consecutive Date
Events
Flow Days
Days
Range
Flow Gauge JHl-A
MY1 1 13 47 75 2/16/2022 - 4/4/2022
Flow Camera JHl-A
MY1* 1 5 4 10 7/8/2022 - 7/12/2022
* Flow Camera was not installed until 5/3/2022

24
22
20
18
16
a
420
14
3
N
G1
00 12
a
0
s
Q 10
a
s
v
_
8
a
a
J
i
°J 6
�a
4
2
0
-2
-4
a�
47 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
02/16/2022 - 04/04/2022
2022 Flow Gauge JH1-A
K'L
NP
Daily Precip (in)
ti
J
Date
FG JH1-A
......• DS Riffle Elevation
ti� titi ti�
O
12
10
E:
4
Pj

4
3
2
1
2022 JH 1-6 Stage Recorder Graph
Daily Precip (in) SR JH1-B Top of Bank
ti
Date
12
10
8
0
6 a
4
2
I
Ares

Strawberry Hill Flow Cam Photos (MYl) — Longest Event (4 days; 7/8/22-7/12/22)

y ���� � �r�i� � ?`�' �.�ti1,�j� I'�'Jii� 'y�+ ��na � � �t�,i� �� �r � + ', + r� l „ � ,. � •
y'S• ✓'� f ! +i�' �y� I r y� �yf ddul'� eti!
7� ii.A� S� wi A�ti 7 ♦�� k�l'(fi7al}16 r7 I �'�rii�h �� �'�
4��+
i� a; I � A +i u a •i7�A i F7 r r x �' +. � i l l � t _
r f
�rl+ ill; � .ry � +�r '� 7 i b+ � I + i, I? i � 1I r � .rV.r J � � r •j - — \` �.•
e r �� yf•. '."
". .. Eyf .. /• y � � � ,e..,i_ 11 ��`
r it .'
i
Ad
F `� SH JH1A • 07/12/2022 06:35:52AN

Appendix E
Project Timeline and
Contact Information

Table 4. Proiect Timeline and Contacts
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Task Completion or
Deliverable Submission
Project Institute
NA
Dec-20
Mitigation Plan Approve
NA
Nov-20
Construction (Grading) Completed
NA
20-Jan-22
Planting Completed
NA
07-Mar-22
As -built Survey Completed
NA
May-22
MY-0 Baseline Report
Mar-22
May-22
Encroachment
Areas noted in Nov-22. Hunting driving path continued use and farm equipment cutting
corners. Only applies to buffer mitigation -only section of Project. RES is actively resolving.
MY1 Monitoring Report
Nov-22
Jan-23
Remediation Items (e.g. beaver removal, supplements, repairs etc.)
Strawberry Hill #100094
Provider
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC
27612
Mitigation Provider POC
Jamey Mceachran [phone]
Designer
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC
27612
Primary project design POC
Ben Carroll, PE [phone]
Construction Contractor
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC
7612
[acy
Construction contractor POC
Kirkpatrick