20230235 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230209

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/21/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20230235 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Zachary Thomas:eads\ztthomas
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY 370 Green Oaks Parkway
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
2/9/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Utley Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.6519 -78.8574
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 18 - Minor Discharges
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
D'ANDREA REALTY GROUP LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB: 019092 DP: 01610
2c. Contact Person:
Phil D'Andrea
2d. Address
Street Address
PO Box 1381
Address Line 2
City
Fuquay-Varina
Postal /Zip Code
27526
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Hamlin
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Holly Springs
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0649223243
2c. Project Address
Street Address
370 Green Oaks Parkway
Address Line 2
City
Holly Springs
Postal / Zip Code
27540
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Utley Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040102
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
3.07
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The tree canopy is dominated by mature pines in the eastern half and hardwood trees in the western half. The topography of the Site
ranges from +/- 336-362 feet above mean sea level (msl). Land use in the vicinity includes commercial and industrial development, high -density residential, and forested, undeveloped
land.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.08
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
208
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the Project is to construct a commercial facility and associated infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The proposed Project involves construction of a commercial facility, driveways, parking, access roads, and associated stormwater devices and utilities. Access to the Site will be provided
by a driveway connection to Green Oaks Parkway to the south and a driveway connection to Premier Drive to the west. The commercial facility must accommodate large tractor trailers,
thereby requiring two points of ingress/egress. The driveway from Premier Drive will result in permanent wetland and stream impacts to install a culvert. No other impacts from the Project
design are proposed.
The Project proposes to tie into existing utilities adjacent to the Site. A detention pond is proposed to treat stormwater on the Site. Typical equipment used in construction and utility
projects (i.e., backhoes, excavators, dump trucks) will be utilized.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
No Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2022-01723
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
JD Concurrence email received from USACE on 12/7/2022 (see attached)
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1
Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
WA
Yes
Both
0.040
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.040
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.040
2i. Comments:
Proposed permanent wetland impacts total 0.04 acre for a road crossing. No other wetland impacts are proposed.

3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
1 - Road Crossing - Culvert
Permanent
Culvert
SA
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
68
(linear feet)
S2
1 - Road Crossing -
Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
SA
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
8
(linear feet)
S3
1 - Road Crossing - Riprap
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SA
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
21
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
89
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
97
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
8
3j. Comments:
Total proposed permanent stream impacts due to the culvert total 68 LF (177 SF / 0.004 ac) and total proposed permanent - no loss stream impacts due
to a riprap dissipator pad are 21 LF (102 SF/0.002 ac). Total proposed temporary stream impacts due to dewatering to install the culvert are 8 LF (19.5
SF / 0.0004 ac).
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
A wetland, stream, and riparian buffer delineation were performed to identify environmentally sensitive areas on the Site prior to site design. The Project
was designed to avoid & minimize impacts to jurisdictional features while meeting the goals of the commercial development plan. Widening and the
addition of a sidewalk are required by the municipality along Premier Drive as part of this development. A retaining wall is proposed along Premier Drive
to avoid impacts to the stream and wetland by avoiding the need to extend the existing culvert and fill slope. Retaining walls are also proposed along the
driveway connection to Premier Drive to minimize the impacts to the stream and wetland in this area. This driveway location was chosen to provide
ample sight distance and turn radii for tractor trailers entering and exiting the Site.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Equipment
will be parked and cleaned in uplands away from jurisdictional areas. Work within jurisdictional areas will be conducted during periods when dry weather
is predicted, and large bare areas of soil will be reseeded and protected as soon as practicable. Silt fencing and sediment basins will also be used to
prevent sediment runoff into the stream and wetland areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Proposed impacts are below mitigation thresholds; therefore, no mitigation is proposed for this project.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
There are no streams or surface waters on the Site that are subject to state -regulated riparian buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre

3. Stormwater Requirements
3a. Select whether a completed stormwater management plan (SMP) is included for review and approval or if calculations are provided to document the project will not cause degradation of
downstream surface waters.*
Stormwater Management Plan Antidegradation Calculations
Comments:
The stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved by the locally delegated authority.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Per the NC DWQ April 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale residential development projects have a "low potential for cumulative
impact" since the project already in a developed landscape (i.e., existing residences and development in the vicinity) and the area already contains the
necessary infrastructure (i.e., sewer, water, electricity, etc.). The project drains to Utley Creek, which is Class C Waters, (i.e., not HQW or ORW). We
anticipate the NCDWR will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
The Project will tie into existing sewer adjacent to the Site.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved? *
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) database, four threatened and endangered
species and one Candidate species are potentially present on the Site. Habitat for red -cockaded woodpecker and Atlantic pigtoe is not present on the
Site. There are no open stands of older pines on the Site. The intermittent stream on -site does not provide adequate habitat for Atlantic pigtoe. Forested
areas on and nearby the Site may provide potential roosting habitat for the tri-colored bat (Proposed Threatened). Potential habitat for Michaux's sumac
may be present along the edges of the Site, but these areas are periodically maintained. Potential habitat for monarch butterfly (Candidate) is present
along the open edges of the Site. There are several ponds of sufficient size to support foraging habitat nearby the Site; however, no visible signs of bald
eagle habitat are present on the Site. The NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database report indicates no known occurrences of threatened or
endangered species on or within 1.0 mile of the Site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper
The Project is located in Wake County which does not contain any Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NCSHPO HPOWEB Map Service
The Site is not listed as a historic property or within a historic district. No historic structures were found on the Site. Two historic properties and one
historic district were identified within one mile of the Site. The two properties are designated as "Surveyed Only." The Leslie -Alford -Mims House
(WA0629) is a "National Register" boundary located +/- 1.0 mile east of the Site. Figure 4 provides a graphical representation and description of these
properties.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map Service Center
Panel 3720064900K, effective on 07/19/2022
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
SAW-2022-01723 - NWP18 Request - 370 Green Oaks Parkway - PCN Attachments.pdf 2.01 MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Attachments:
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 — USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — PJD Sketch Map (by Sage & others)
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
NCNHP Database Report
IPaC Resource List
Notice of Intent to File Permit Application
SAW-2022-01723
Impact Maps
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kimberly Hamlin

Signature
Wegy 140.54
Date
2/9/2023

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
E5
.21116
February 9, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: 370 Green Oaks Parkway
SAW-2022-01723
Request for NWP 18
Sage Project #2022.015
On behalf of D'Andrea Realty Group, LLC (c/o Mr. Phil D'Andrea) (owner and applicant), please find attached a
complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) that the activities associated with the proposed 370 Green Oaks Parkway Project (Project)
may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18. Proposed impacts are below notification thresholds designated
in General Certification (GC) 4249; therefore, a courtesy copy is being provided to the NC Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR).
Protect Purpose and Location
The purpose of the Project is to construct a commercial facility and associated infrastructure. The Project is
located at 370 Green Oaks Parkway, in Holly Springs, Wake County, NC. The coordinates of 35.6519°N,
78.85748°W generally correspond to the center of the Site. The Site is within the southern piedmont region of
North Carolina and in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Protect Detail
The proposed Project involves construction of a commercial facility, driveways, parking, access roads, and
associated stormwater devices and utilities. Access to the Site will be provided by a driveway connection to
Green Oaks Parkway to the south and a driveway connection to Premier Drive to the west. The commercial
facility must accommodate large tractor trailers, thereby requiring two points of ingress/egress. The driveway
from Premier Drive will result in permanent wetland and stream impacts to install a culvert. No other impacts from
the Project design are proposed.
The Project proposes to tie into existing utilities adjacent to the Site. A detention pond is proposed to treat
stormwater on the Site. Typical equipment used in construction and utility projects (i.e., backhoes, excavators,
dump trucks) will be utilized.
The Site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The tree canopy is dominated by mature pines in the eastern
half and hardwood trees in the western half. The topography of the Site ranges from +/- 336-362 feet above
mean sea level (msl). Land use in the vicinity includes commercial and industrial development, high -density
residential, and forested, undeveloped land.
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
database, four threatened and endangered species and one Candidate species are potentially present on the
Site. Habitat for red -cockaded woodpecker and Atlantic pigtoe is not present on the Site. There are no open
stands of older pines on the Site. The intermittent stream on -site does not provide adequate habitat for Atlantic
pigtoe. Forested areas on and nearby the Site may provide potential roosting habitat for the tri-colored bat
(Proposed Threatened). Potential habitat for Michaux's sumac may be present along the edges of the Site, but
these areas are periodically maintained. Potential habitat for monarch butterfly (Candidate) is present along the
open edges of the Site. There are several ponds of sufficient size to support foraging habitat nearby the Site;
370 Green Oaks Parkway Page 1 of 3

however, no visible signs of bald eagle habitat are present on the Site. The NC Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database report indicates no known occurrences of threatened or endangered species on or within 1.0
mile of the Site.
The Site is not listed as a historic property or within a historic district. No historic structures were found on the
Site. Two historic properties and one historic district were identified within one mile of the Site. The two properties
are designated as "Surveyed Only." The Leslie -Alford -Mims House (WA0629) is a "National Register" boundary
located +/- 1.0 mile east of the Site. Figure 4 provides a graphical representation and description of these
properties.
Protect History
A Site delineation was completed by Ms. Kim Hamlin of Sage Ecological Services, Inc. (Sage) in February 2022.
A PJD requestwas submitted to USACE on August 8, 2022. USACE sent a JD concurrence e-mail on December
7, 2022 (see attached).
Avoidance and Minimization
A wetland, stream, and riparian buffer delineation were performed to identify environmentally sensitive areas on
the Site prior to site design. The Project was designed to avoid & minimize impacts to jurisdictional features while
meeting the goals of the commercial development plan. Widening and the addition of a sidewalk are required by
the municipality along Premier Drive as part of this development. A retaining wall is proposed along Premier
Drive to avoid impacts to the stream and wetland by avoiding the need to extend the existing culvert and fill slope.
Retaining walls are also proposed along the driveway connection to Premier Drive to minimize the impacts to the
stream and wetland in this area. This driveway location was chosen to provide ample sight distance and turn
radii for tractor trailers entering and exiting the Site.
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any
accidental additional impacts. Equipment will be parked and cleaned in uplands away from jurisdictional areas.
Work within jurisdictional areas will be conducted during periods when dry weather is predicted, and large bare
areas of soil will be reseeded and protected as soon as practicable. Silt fencing and sediment basins will also be
used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream and wetland areas.
Project Impacts
Proposed permanent wetland impacts total 0.04 acre for a road crossing. Total proposed permanent stream
impacts due to the culvert total 68 LF (177 SF / 0.004 ac) and total proposed permanent - no loss stream impacts
due to a riprap dissipator pad are 21 LF (102 SF/0.002 ac). Total proposed temporary stream impacts due to
dewatering to install the culvert are 8 LF ( 19.5 SF / 0.0004 ac). No other impacts are proposed.
Mitigation
Proposed impacts are below mitigation thresholds; therefore, no mitigation is proposed for this project.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Respectfully submitted:
4 Amdcn
KimiHamlin, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
� a4tcan Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
370 Green Oaks Parkway Page 2 of 3

Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 — USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — PJD Sketch Map (by Sage & others)
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
NCNHP Database Report
IPaC Resource List
Notice of Intent to File Permit Application
SAW-2022-01723 JD Concurrence E-mail
Impact Maps
370 Green Oaks Parkway Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: B5235EDA-3AOF-4D5F-AB75-DACCBBCAFAD6
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVtCEs
E 57. 2C18
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Representative
Name: Mr. Phil D'Andrea
Email: phildbh 1 C-amail.com
Project Name/Description: D'Andrea Provisions South
Sage Project # 2022.015
Date: 07.19.2022 7/20/2022
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site. DocuSigned by:
Phil D'Andrea
BY:
Print Name of Landowner or
Legal Representative
BY: 3F974-397- 02_
Signature of Landowner or
Legal Representative

Legend
Project Study Area
Map Location USGS Topographic Map Figure 1
Granville 370 Green Oaks Parkway
Franklin Sage Project #2022.015
Orange Durham
N
USGS Topo MapServer, 2021 SAGE
Nash Apex, NC Quadrangle
Wake Prepared by: K. Hamlin
Chatham
• January 31, 2022
Johnston 1 inch = 1,000 feet Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Lee Harnett 0 1,000 2,000 Offiice:919-335-6757
Feet Cell: 919-559-1537

arc `-- _ '' f Mtv2 . 4J �
MvR - XNMYQ HrC
MgC MgC2 MgS • �, C'� I•
MgC _ \r01• Wy.
N1gB2 _ !;. ■ 44l#far . MgC MgB r' 1
_ MgB
,�k I f �
MgC MgC rC
� e,
.I P I
MgC .. \. MGM
Mf D2n-
i,'L WY Mgt�y M'� `.�. ■ .
MgCr, Mg62
Nlgb
Mgg Ntf� ��tC. MgB MkC2
h9yp
Mg8 MgC ..
hAfi72 .
Mg8 2 MgQ
MgC2� Mg r WY gC
ti.. aC
Mgc Feature A
r �
1
Mv❑ . �' s'{
-�M K n . Mgl; � MfD, 1
7 t3+1 MgB itllgC �iVIC +
a WY MCC MgB 7 ry
t � MgB
+j MT172 Ct }.
m gc C r Cr Mac "'N"lu �. �a' . 4, (YV
Cs
mfgc
MgB Ct$
WY YVn Co MgC I ..ggPkF
MP,B j -,• .' PSI YC
J m ru 1 yz f AfA
t s'tcF �F'ki�f'f1F 4ik MgC Wy ,�
_ WV
N - - W
,r
�= l WE '•.
.ilr{; •�� � +( Cq � �
L�7 .
F-kC ;.n Pk
h* krC Mfg F'kF _ FaC?a.
Legend MgC
r7,
Mgc M1n LT PW
Project Study Area `N•y� `�t.,
l0q;
I Pk
Map Location NRCS Soil Survey Map Figure 2
Granville 370 Green Oaks Parkway
Franklin Sage Project #2022.015
Orange Durham
N
Wake County Soil Survey, 1970 SAGE
Nash Sheet #82
Wake Prepared by: K. Hamlin
Chatham
• January 31, 2022
Johnston 1 inch = 1,000 feet Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Lee Harnett 0 1,000 2,000 Office:919-335-6757
Feet Cell: 919-559-1537

ML
NOTE: Features depicted herein must be field verified
by the USACE and/or NCDWR, or its delegated authority
before being valid. Location, shape, and size of depicted
features on the evaluated site are approximate and should
be surveyed by a licensed NC surveyor for final site planning.
TUS7.wSA+/-221 LF
Legend
Project Study Area
O Data Form Location
Potential Wetland WOTUS
— — Potential Non -wetland WOTUS - Intermittent Strea
Culvert
1' Contour
Map Location PJD Sketch Map
Granville
Orange Franklin 370 Green Oaks Parkway
Durham Sage Project #2022.015
Nash Prepared by: K. Hamlin
Wake
Chatham August 4, 2022
•
Johnston 1 inch = 100 feet
Lee Harnett 0 100 200
F
=1111110-
W,
�i ..
Figure 3
N
SAGE
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

ICaEha 9r � �
NCSHPO Data Download: 01/05/2022
hftp://www.ncdcr.gov
_ Easton sl Y
c �
Lr,
7F
�
hry Arhor Way v1Pte g q
�j qry sweet V4olel Or
n
.. 41'='ii��Sl14� Way pncll or Creak 1
S �
„6r
c° r• , - Ste edin on ❑r
'rrlyeal g
_
�, 0° TraycsarcQ
.r'
al G C'
a
Da
n�19try�Pks
e
c .� ab g'hursr� o'Qq'co
ti:�oM
Y 1'
°jSo!
Quaker AAaadows Cr °
Moore 011 Way G n
2`-,{...5 69� SPrlrlgse°�
S
e�y�J,�
♦
G
q Qak v
St
Hinsdale Pl ti x
Naw a
��C ° ,_ Douglas E
f109 sv'ogs Hill Rd T,r i• +
3 _ Chapel -
qS`�
WA0656
sour Mash Gt .Lucky az;b
+�p�I
H,,,� Q yarn a Holly Springs
a
Cemetery
o d WA0640
-----
1V l`7 •i�f 51
Thomas Mill Rd
�¢ y
+Imgs Hew 0
Holly.y"[+ii�
1 -
11 K
� z
`
o
1 T O ❑UI[j�y- W EirP sl q
y
J
E
r�
's � � Os' ri,P Iivliy Spring6 �,
3 ❑ v
yaks
Il''� 8
�
7a
Pkwy
W $affen line Si °
I
C
.rL
ASV,rm Sr
.S a
a LhrCka9
'Zy' $LJS� Cl
"
L
Leslie
-Alford -Mims W Elm Ave w
House
.
- WA0629
[^ N at . cgsi r
❑` C� i � � x,aP1e
�Fggc
�� °•y_
Zia Alead°r+oV,+�
�C
�°A� % � �
4E''gn
Aveni ws �°
m prg�•
°@8 L•ur 3•B
fp
Legend
a
Ps C full 1. SF•imgx
.s Way
y R
al
�00 �6r
Project Study Area
T Uaidi^a
P
0
1u11y�o
e
aaow 0 w °n irl
W'�C
Sir ✓�pp
Boll Lii
y
- - ._ -
�' 'a,,a
1-Mile Project Buffer
cos
of �arphsr
hens
Av a dolly kf ran ch6i 5� &
,� m od
NCSHPO Status
Surveyed Only
Ay ent F V"Y An
uN
❑ Cleonlect
National Register Boundary
NQA i
�rart°spa`
Map Location
NCSHPO Map
Figure 4
Granville
Franklin
370 Green Oaks Parkway
Orange Durham
Sage Project #2022.015
N
Nash
Prepared by: K. Hamlin
SAGE
Wake
Chatham
January 31, 2022
•
Johnston
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Lee Harnett
0 1,000 2,000
Offiice:919-335-6757
Feet
Cell: 919-559-1537

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
February 2, 2023
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: 370 Green Oaks Parkway; 2022.015
Dear Kim Hamlin:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

\
\ O ®
7a e
\
CO\ \
< u
\ O 6 \ ± u ±
2 % « e « e ®
/ (nw .y 2 .y 2 \ %
® ® s E \
/ ® ® \\
\ &ƒ
\\
CO s CO « 3
2 /s Z\
e \ \ \ 0 3
>« E E E g \
} / » 4 \
g % 4 o Cl e e e § /\\ \\\=:
CO / } 0)u e y m 33 3 > s
? \ } G
e o e 4 2/// \%
/ 9 e e c s a a a ©-
cn
\ / a 3 ./
\ / ) \ \ \
«4% 3/ �§
\�0\\ 0.
CO \ ~ © / _ \ ƒ ±
caad9 g / e
x/6yH mw\ee \ CO
\\
coCO (\ ) / < \ \ \ / n -
\ \ \ / uL
^ CO\ z z z \
± o o-° co
e \ \ \ �
\ \ g 0 & & n
\ \ \
\ e z t e a s :
= 3 / / a e \ §
CO e / m CO e / 3 3 3 %\
Z 0 E / c
/ 5 // \ e± x
$\ 3 a) \/
u \ ye
= CO e z \ ©4 4 4
} \ E o D / \ \ / / / / / \ \
c E o e — g e °
O §e 2 CO CO 2/ 3E
= 2 7 /:
\ O / / 7 / « s /
E CO / \ E § \ \}
H ee CO \ } / /`
\ \ ( e e O e
CO Z ° ° CO .k / \f
\ 2 � J 2 _ / / / ~ &
\ t ^ \ \» \ \ \ \ \
m t y CO / a s s
\
_ / / / / \ \ \ \ \ n 000 0 \
n g \ \ \ \ \ 0\
/_ v ® E = e s s s
c © _ / E \ .k.k.k \ \
( / / / / \ G / / & & & \ \
© o / e= a s s =§
) » % ® ± ± u g \ / w \ 3 3 3
§ > > % < 4 E \ \ \ \ / / / ) {
\ / z \ \ \ \ / © s s e / / / .0 )
( \ j \ / \ \ \ / / \ \ \ / / / ~
3 5 3 o o (n 3 Z a s x x Zee e \\
§
/

�
s
R
�
%
a-
@
�
@
0
E
(D
t
�
0
C)
I-
CIO
�
co
�
�
N
W
�
2
Z
C)
z
2 � �
f 5 ]
\ / M z
t
� q f 2
E < & 3
\ ] / _
f {
\ } k § ƒ
/ O B O O
s
5
s
_
\
c

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/HYPGKMOEA,ZEVMEUMT..
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust
resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project
area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project
may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -
specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the
defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS
Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Servicesr
o
[phone]-
l(
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
1 of 7 2/2/2023, 5:05 PM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/locationMWGKMOEAZEWBEUMT...
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence
(AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected
by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may
indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can
change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects
to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species
which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted,
permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement
can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or
from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official speci
list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species! and their critical habitats are managed by the Eco o ical Services Program of the U. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries?).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 14
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or
proposed, for listing. See the Listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mamm
NAME a< STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered
Wherever found
N,o critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
i s-0
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Fishes
NAME STATUS
2 of 7 2/2/2023, 5:05 PM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/HYPGKMOEA,ZEVMEUMT..
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/speci es/6063
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with e en r�ll species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats
should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
49-
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/ ibrary/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-
incidental-take-migratorry it
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-
conservation-measures.pcif
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and
how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every
bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds
in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data map Lang tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on
your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and
abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important
information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory
birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to
be present and breeding in your project area.
3 of 7 2/2/2023, 5:05 PM

INC: Explore Location resources
NAME
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/HYPGKMOEA,ZEVv'BEUMT..
BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because
of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferu! Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.\C)
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus B Ma ;Zesp 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina t Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Probabilityof Presence Summary`-
��
The graphs below provide our best understanding of win birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This
information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you
read and understand the F 'Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report. -6 1(%Navr
Probability of Presence (■)
,0=4
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular
week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and
the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability
of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of
any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values
fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no
yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
4 of 7 2/2/2023, 5:05 PM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/HYPGKMOEA,ZEVMEUMT..
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the
10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is
areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much
more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Bald Eagle
*101
1+11
11N
*1+.1
0+
++++
+++*
s*++
111$
+011
1111
Non -BCC Vulnerable
____
____
__IN
SEEM
L.___
____
Chimney Swift
I
++++
I
TI
+iii
+111
116
'��
Ifil
����
HII
����
iiii
1111
110+
++++
++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Eastern Whip -poor -will
++++
IT IT+
TTT+
++++
+11+
++++
++++
++++
++++
++++
++++
++++
++++ _
BCC Rangewide (CON)
AN■
■EN■
MEN
.
Prairie Warbler
I
++++
I
'+++
++++
+110
y
T+++
++++
++++
++++
+0++
++++
++++
+++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prothonotary Warbler
++ I
T T
TT I_ I +
++++
101'
m111
11+1
11]'
++11
11++
++++
++++
++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
I -
Red -headed Woodpecker
T T 11 I TTT 1 I + +++1 111 T T1++ +I" ++++ +++1 1+11 ++++ +++1
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Wood Thrush ++++ ++++ ++++ +11' '111 1+1' +11� ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the
area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are
most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable
depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in
your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (A M). The AKN data is based on a
growing collection of survey, banding and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the
1 Urn grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may
occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This
data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability
of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these
graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your
location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your
results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be
nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
5 of 7 2/2/2023, 5:05 PM

INC: Explore Location resources
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/HYPGKMOEA,ZEVMEUMT..
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including
Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for
eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy
development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the
birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help
avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area
off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may
be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA
project webpage.
.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on
survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag
studies or contact Caleb SI p_[tg2l or Pam Loring.V0991-
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle ct should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report _1%
\J **
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your
list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the
migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort
(indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If
the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar
means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying
what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might
be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures
to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit
the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird
trust resources pa*4\
— )P%
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination'
conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
6 of 7 2/2/2023, 5:05 PM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/HYPGKMOEA,ZEVMEUMT..
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or
other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local Army CC rps of Engineers District.
This location did not intersect any wetlands mapped by NWI.
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional information
on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of
these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and
geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision
the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the
collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be oc onal fereiilEes in polygon
boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on sit
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used
to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries
and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These
habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions i
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in
this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state,
or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning
specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
7 of 7 2/2/2023, 5:05 PM

Kim Hamlin
From:
Kim Hamlin
Sent:
Thursday, July 21, 2022 6:33 PM
To:
401 PreFile
Subject:
Notice of intent to file 401 permit
Good afternoon,
This email serves as notice of intent to file a permit for the 370 Green Oaks Parkway project located in Holly Springs,
Wake County, NC.
Thank you,
Kim Hamlin
Kim Hamlin, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Cell: 919.622.7888
[e-mail]

Kim Hamlin
From: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 12:35 PM
To: Kim Hamlin
Subject: 370 Green Oaks Parkway / Holly Springs / Wake County / SAW-2022-01723 / JD Request
Attachments: PJD Sketch.pdf
Dear Kim Hamlin,
Reference is made to ORM ID SAW-2022-01723, please reference this number on any correspondence regarding this
action.
On 08/08/2022, we received information from you requesting the Wilmington District, Regulatory Division review and
concur with the boundaries of an aquatic resource delineation.
We have reviewed the information provided by you concerning the aquatic resources, and by copy of this e-mail, are
confirming that the aquatic resources delineation has been verified by the Corps to be a sufficiently accurate and
reliable representation of the location and extent of aquatic resources within the identified Project Study Area. The
location and extent of these aquatic resources are shown on the delineation map, labeled PJD Sketch Map.
Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 16-01
https://usace.contentdm.ocic.org/utils/getfile/collection/P16021coll9/id/l256 provides guidance for Jurisdictional
Determinations (JD) and states "The Corps generally does not issue a JD of any type where no JD has been
requested". At this time we are only verifying the delineation. This delineation may be relied upon for use in the permit
evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. "This verification does not address nor include any
consideration for geographic jurisdiction on aquatic resources and shall not be interpreted as such. This delineation
verification is not an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) and is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an AJD, which is an appealable
action.
If you wish to receive a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD), or an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
please respond accordingly, otherwise nothing further is required and we will not provide any additional
documentation.
The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource
boundaries and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular
site identified in this request. This delineation may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the Food
Security Act of 1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service
center, prior to starting work.
Lyle Phillips
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587

Phone: [phone], Ext. 25.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at https://regulatory.ops.usace.armV.mil/customer-service-survey/ . Thank you for taking the time to visit this
site and complete the survey.

w
?
m !<!
y / /
O�
- U
s \ ! \
>
/ \ -
®
\ / - \
�
§ ~ :: \ }/\(( O o \/
^ :,= 05/(
_-u
�2/z
G :\
z E:
O < /:
N
� � z � ^(
�
u O
� � 3: <CL
CL u <
L .
z �
2 <
--o » O
\ z { r \
CL Ow V)
Z ~LU\
LU 0 Z LLJ _
Lu >- 0 � V) � �}
L
0 _
CD
z
+
(Y)
errs:
®3#/:
O LU
0UZzz3\)
(_.}\ Q:/< 0
�j}\} \ 0
/
z
„ \\}\ ®
2 �
\
> :
\ . \
z (
\ (}/10
0

0
wo
U
/
IL
J
O
C)
J
o Z
/
Z
J
—
Q
Q
W N
/
\
o
o
O
o
30
/
h
ow
Q
_-
_-------
U
u
ti.
----_---_---___
LIJ
3�
�� oc-os
u m
-
----
3
m
a- Q
O -
w
d'S—•—ASS
Ezij
'
O o
�
SS'r�' —SS
—�� V — �, M
�
(Y) �

¢
O�rU
Z h Q M- O Z N w
caw Uv' w�p U m,'i- Z
2
z '
w¢z2Z
ui�O z rr0
z 3o�m w��w3 Q�wmw
LU w Jam°' mwQv'� owJwU
d' Q U O ¢> y O U m Q d
a �J�oZ�wNsQ�ZONN
v
Q
O w
a
9wo
a m
K
0
�
w
G
0
z
w= 0 N
Y w wU I
1�
c
bL 6b£
L Y££
7-
J.
o e££
a1
o
0
=rm
___________ _ __
i
a
0
� H
U
L a
¢
¢
F
n
o
0
0
a, a,
_
o'
o
FLU
V HE
a
LU
_
J
d
LU
S
�
Q M
z
LU
C
o
Q r
d
N
LU
Q
a
Z
w
w
w
El El
_
I
Q
3:
F
�
a
U
CQ
N
W
F—
x
W
F—
W
J
i
U
6
II —III
rw_
w
zzo
OLL
FDw
m
F—
LU
J
r 4
C >
LL
=D
oZ
U
z
o
zwd
j
Zoo
� o
U p w
Z
o
i
0
N
U
� NQ
Oo UO
Z z
�O DC U
AL W w
W z um
�0
z wp
� � 3
� r �
QQC9 s
0 LU O
Z CL
W w J
LU
'QUO
V O^
0