20071712 Ver 1_Application_20071010

M~

~.
c
S
p~
'`~
v

071712
SUBJECT: Nationwide 23 Permit Application for the Replacement of Bridge No. 46 over White Oak
Branch on NC 403, Duplin County, WBS # 33461.1.1
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 46 over
White Oak Branch on NC 403 in Duplin County. The contract will be implemented as a Division Three-Purchase
Order Contract (POC) project. The existing 2 span, 36 ft timber bridge with 24 ft of clear roadway will be replaced
with a longer bridge along the existing alignment. The proposed bridge will be a 2 span, 8S-ft prestressed concrete
cored slab bridge with 40 ft of clear roadway. The attached Categorical Exclusion document states that the proposed
bridge is 7S ft in length, however it should be noted that the proposed bridge length was changed to 8S ft. to shift the
interior bent out of the stream channel.
The structure will include two -12 ft travel lanes with 8-ft offsets. Approach work will consist of
resurfacing and tying into the existing alignment for approximately 380 feet to the west and approximately 370 feet
to the east of the existing bridge. The roadway approaches and bridge grades will approximately match existing
elevations therefore there will be no reduction in navigational clearance. Guardrail will be installed where
warranted and as depicted on the plan sheet. Traffic will be detoured along surrounding roads during construction.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE [JNITEll STATES
eye ,,,,„
~~~q~
`v a,:,,,,,s'
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
fA,
~~
0` ~, ~~~
,~N~) ; y~'M1~ O ~ ice'
k~J4.i1.
~, ;~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ,.,...9~ ~f.
3 MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERArOR
October 2, 200
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Ms. Jennifer Frye
NCDOT Coordinator
7
This project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin within USGS hydrologic unit 03030007 (subbasin 030622).
The proposed bridge replacement is located over the White Oak Branch (DWQ Index No. 18-74-19-6) Class C Sw.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers verified the wetlands for this project on March 11, 2003 (Action ID
#200300651). A total of 0.002 acres (70.16-sq. ft.) of riverine wetland will be impacted by this project associated
with shoulder construction. There are no stream impacts on this project. The hydro report for this project included a
reinforced concrete box culvert alternative for this site however, after Division personnel review the site in the field,
the bridge alternative was chosen. In addition, to further minimize impacts the bridge will be constructed using top
construction methods and an off site detour will be utilized during~construction. Rip rap slope protection around the
end bents is being proposed at a 2:1 slope to further minimize impacts. No permanent or temporary utility impacts
are proposed with this project.
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
124 Division Drive, Wilmington, NC 28401
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

BRIDGE DEMOLITION
The existing deck and bridge railings are composed of concrete. The substructwe is composed of timber bents and
caps. The Department will take every precautionary measure necessary to ensure that no components will be
dropped into waters of the United States. The bridge will be removed using top down methods and NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION ~
Based upon the letter from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Wilmington District dated September 1, 2004, it is ' ~`'
understood that the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Systems Ecosystem Enhancement ~~ "
Program (EEP), will assume responsibility for satisfying the Federal Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation
requirements for all NCDOT projects at a 2:1 ratio. It is also NCDOT's understanding that if the USACE District ~ ~~
Engineer determines that compensatory mitigation is required for any project, it will be submitted to EEP for ~'
acceptance on a quarterly basis by the Department with a copy provided to the Wilmington District office for ~.'
verification and accounting purposes. f~' '~
The Department has avoided and minunized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent possible as
described above: Therefore, if required by USACE District Engineer, the remaining, unavoidable impacts to OA02
acres of jt3risdictional riverine wetlands will be offset by compensatory mitigation provided by the EEP program.
These impacts aze proposed in a coastal plain small stream riverine wetland in the Cape Fear River Basin within
USGS hydrologic unit 03030007 (subbasin 030622).
NATURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Species with the federal classification of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened
are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The United States Fish and Wildlife Service lists three federally protected species for Duplin
County: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), and
American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana). A Natural Heritage GIS Database and field review for occurrences
and habitat for these species was conducted and a determination of "No Effect" for the listed species is
recommended.
HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservations Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 296 CFR Part 800, this project has been
reviewed and cleazed for effects on historical and archeological resources (see attachments).
REGULATORY APPROVAL
Section 404 Permit: NCDOT is requesting authorization under Nationwide 23 under the USACE Nationwide Permit
program (72 FR 11092; March 12, 2007).
Section 401 Permit: NCDOT anticipates that the corresponding 401 General Certification # 3632 for Nationwide 23
will apply to this project. Therefore, in accordance with the Water Quality Certification 3632 we are hereby
providing DWQ with two copies of the application for review. Furthermore, the NCDOT will adhere to ali general
conditions of the Water Quality Certification.
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Mason Herndon
Division 3 DEO
cc: John Hennessey, DWQ Raleigh (2 copies)
124 Division Drive, Wilmington, NC 28401
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

,. ~~~ ~ APR i 7 2~0~
`~- U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS -
Wilmington District
Action 1D: 200300651 County: Du lin
Notification of Jurisdictional Determination
Property Authorized Agent:
Owner: Ms. Wendi Smith
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager HSMM
Project Development & Environmental Analysis 1305 Navaho Drive
1548 Mail Service Center Suite 303
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1548 Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): T1P Project No. B-
4105, Bridge No. 46 on NC 403 over the White Oak Branch, Duplin County, North Carolina.
Basis for Determination: Onsite field inspection of selected wetland sites.
Indicate Which of the Following apply:
^ There are wetlands on the above described property which we strongly suggest should be delineated and surveyed.
The s>»veyed :vetlar~d Lines must bcverified by our-staff before the Corps will make a final. jurisdictional
determination on your property.
,~ On March 11, 2003 ,the undersigned inspected the Section 404 jurisdictional line as determined by the NCDOT
and/or its representatives for the subject NCDOT project. A select number of wetland sites were inspected for the
proposed project and all were found to accurately reflect the limits of Corps jurisdiction. The Corps believes that
this jurisdictional delineation as depicted in the February 4, 2003 and March 19, 20031etters submitted by
HSMM, INC can be relied on for planning purposes and impact assessment.
^ The wetlands on your lot have been delineated and the limits of the Corps jurisdiction have been explained to you.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this detem~ination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
^ There are no wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the permit requirements of
section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 13.44). Unless there is a change in the law or ourpublished
regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
^ The project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. -You should contact the nearest State Office of Coastal
Management to detemline their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the
Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A
permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you
have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Mr. Dave
Timpy at 910-251-4634.
Project Manager Signature
Date Aprii 10, 2003 Expiration Date April 10, 2008
CF: Mason Herndon, NCDOT Division 3

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No. B-4105
WBS Element No. 33461.1.1
State Project No. 8.1242501
Federal Project No. BRSTP-403(961
A. Project Description:
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 46 on NC 403 over White Oak Branch in Duplin
County. The bridge will be replaced with a new bridge measuring 75 feet in
length and 40 feet in width at approximately the same location as the existing
bridge. This bridge will provide fora 24 foot travelway and 8 foot offsets on each
side. The new approach roadway will be a 24 foot travelway with 8 foot grassed
shoulders. The approach work will consist of 380 feet to the west and 370 feet to
the east of the existing bridge. The roadway grade of the new structure will be
approximately the same as the existing grade at this location. Traffic will be
detoured on existing local roads during construction as shown in Figure 1. There
will be 1 mile of additional travel (about 3 minutes).
B. Purpose and Need:
Bridge Maintenance records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 33.0
out of 100. The bridge's two span superstructure is composed of a reinforced
concrete deck on timber joist with an asphalt wearing surface. The substructure is
composed of timber caps on timber piles. The bridge's low superstructure
condition rating qualifies the bridge as structurally deficient according to Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) standards and therefore eligible for FHWA's
Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. The bridge is also
functionally obsolete due to the deck geometry rating. The replacement of this
inadequate structure will result in safer traffic operations.
C. Proposed Improvements:
The following Type II improvements which apply to the project are circled:
1. Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments

Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements)
when located in a commercial area or other high activity center in which
there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil
or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation
guidelines.

SR1317 (White Oak Bridge Road). This would be 3 minutes additional travel time ( 1
mile additional travel). Resurfacing the detour roads will be necessary to strengthen and
widen the pavement and remove the weight posting (currently 6.5 tons) on these routes.
Bridge Demolition:
Bridge No. 46 has 2 spans totaling 35 feet in length. The bridge superstructure is
composed of a reinforced concrete deck on timber~oist with an asphalt wearing surface.
The substructure is composed of timber caps on timber piles. All components of the
bridge will be removed without dropping any of their components into Waters of the
United States.
Alternatives Studied and Rejected:
The "do-nothing" alternative will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge. This is not
acceptable due to the traffic service provided by NC 403.
Due to the short detour (1 mile) and the relatively low traffic (2400 vehicles per day),
and the presence of high quality wetlands in the project area, no other alternatives were
studied.
E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II actions.
ECOLOGICAL YES NO
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource? ~ X
(2) Does the project involve any habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur? ^ X
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish?
X
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) acre and have all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? X
(5) Will the project require use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ^
X
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely ^
impacted by proposed construction activities? X

(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control? ~ X
(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property? ~ X
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ~ X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/ or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
h
f
t
ere
ore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? X
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes? ^ X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
b
e replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility) X ^
and will all construction proposed in association with the
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility?
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic and
environmental grounds concerning aspects of the action? ~ X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws
relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? ~ X
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are ^
important to history or pre-history? X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? ~ X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
7

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-4105
WBS Element No. 33461.1.1
State Project No. 8.1242501
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-403(96)
Proiect Description:
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 46 on NC 403 over White Oak Branch in Duplin
County. The bridge will be replaced with a new bridge measuring 75 feet in
length and 40 feet in width at approximately the same location as the existing
bridge. This bridge will provide fora 24 foot travelway and 8 foot offsets on each
side. The new approach roadway will be a 24 foot travelway with 8 foot grassed
shoulders. The approach work will consist of 380 feet to the west and 370 feet to
the east of the existing bridge. The roadway grade of the new structure will be
approximately the same as the existing grade at this location. Traffic will be
detoured on existing local roads during construction as shown in Figure 1. There
will be 1 mile of additional (about 3 minutes).
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification:
X TYPE II(A)
TYPE II(B)
Approved`` :/I~
ate Teresa Hart, PE, CP ,Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
~ r
Date William T. oodwin Jr., P. nit Head
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
~~..o ~ ~
Date oel A. Johnson, roject Development Engineer
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
9

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Replacement of Bridge No. 46
On NC 403 over White Oak Branch
Duplin County
Federal-Aid No. BRSTP-403(9)
State Project No. 8.1242501
WBS Element No. 33461.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4105
Commitments Developed Through Project Development and Desi~rl
Hydraulics Unit, Roadside Environmental Unit, Division Three Construction Office,
Structure Design Unit
NCDOT will adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) for "Bridge
Demolition and Removal "during the removal of Bridge No. 46.
Green Sheet
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Page 1 of 1
July 2004

~
•° •~r~ a ~-. ®E• p W A Y N E
1 \ -., - ~~
78` 80 ~ 325
~ .
----

~ !~
~
~ , ;ti

' i 45
'>
~"•
~ 453
~ ~ ~
~ 'f` •;
-
,, :~
\
~
~•
_
1.°w ~ i ~ N ! •• ~ 1~} , i 1300 P72 3 '.
f
~
•1 •1
_ 5"

~~ 1 LL'

•7`_19 '
t
~ 1 1
,
1319
/
i ~ •
• ~4 P8"7 P8$• ;
•
~ ~
- j -~
~z '~ ,~
='~' 1'
107
.9
. 1 ~ ~
_,
~ ~
i : ;''.. _;~-' ~ •i ~a,l.•~' •:. '-1+^°- i ~ 352

• ~ ~ \~ '~
1 ~
• 1 i94
~ I ~~~
~
•' -~
~
\. 110
.6
/•
P112 '
~
1 . A Iv.7ao 1 :' ` sroarQO '~ 1 1 abn-i°1.-.•~ '~ 'ieoe

. X
n.,~.
~'~ ~ ~;~ ~ i '
219 9 'v
' ar°Iwn In ,t;Jl~b. P265•.!~
'\ ~.b \
$_ L~4 \ 12i
•
1 ~ _ ~.
J 1 3
~
I 1
i _.
` ~ .J 1174 ~~ _ `
\ ~~
~
1
. ~
.
~83
.`
r•' ~
T71
~~
•'~
~
; ! f
~ \ 1~ i
7 ~-.~ ~
-' `~ ~
-•
' ~
` 1511
_ \ y
\ ~f
1 •
~
• /•• 1 ~ ~ ,~

439 i
m _ 1
~ /wi
:
i
~, i-.-..~ •~
.
~ \
`-"'•-. • 99
I
•: -7
% \
-
•~'•. '$ ~,
_
~'`
~
:10
~
~ 1319
' _-
° 101 ~
~.. ,~
~.
O l~ Olo
al N
I41 ]IO
I 1>Q 134 ~ b
-.. ms 1~1 . • \
~r? ~• p
/.
309
• ~'
_ _ ~ ~
~ ~
I~ P7 ' .9 !~ ~~
i -
/••
1 wwasWw
~.
~.. ~~ ' ' •~ '~p1
~ ' . . ~. ~•~ \,105
17
01

1 •
1 h- ~•~ \.--.. ~1 iQ04
s "~1~ ~ ~~
r~I/=
1 ~
. ~ \ 17/9\
\

~~ ~ /'-~/
' IT.i
olive ~ ~ ;
~ it o `.\ t D
~ ~~i~~i'
~
i
"~: ,<9n ~11DN,J0 1 _-
~
D e fo u~ /2 o K t e
,,, ~ ~ a
o_.___ ._._._ ,
w xg3r+' ~~ ._' J
..
.A
*S ' M ~ ~' /
It
+~ I;a6aaJnlle vol .
® 1~ 7 j i! 111
Je`a~nll
~1.~ 1 U~ P L ;. I ~„ N
aaRnalit ,1 ~+
~
'

!I) '
50
"~ dl tymaa

~ 1
`
~ t
' 1
i Rost Ndl ~CMnpbaO.n G -
:
y ~
• aenerer J
a
~.
Tpppry.•
~, ~
-+ ~~
flmGly tysacss~
~~
Geed
.,
a, 1 / y~_
J ~O"T~ c NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
~~O ~~O
jy ~~•,, TRANSPORTATION
j~ Z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~ ~j PROTECT DEVELOPMENT &
~~ P`'~ ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
F
~,pF Tn~1+5e°
DUPLIN COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE 1Y0. 46 ON NC 403
OVER WHITE OAK BRANCH
B-4105
Figure I

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Historical Resources
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary David L. S.,,$~Tre~`
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary ~ ~-'~
Office of Archives and History ~ '~ `" .. ~ ~ w~ '` ~ f. ~'
ar
X _
March 24, 2004
- ~-
MEMOR~-~NDUNI ' ,~ '
+~
• r `, ~,
TO: Greg Thorpe, Ph.D., Director ~~'- tr "~
-;tin'-~ ~ ~'
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch ~"~~~'~~-=~- ' ~`-,`-' ``~,~~`-''`
NCDOT Division of Highways ~~``"~~~+~
rl '~ '
FROl~i: David Brook I~ ~~~ -,~, ~~~~ ~'~~
N
SLBJECT: Replacement of Bridge Rio. 46 on NC 403 over White Oak Branch, B-4105,
Duplin County, ER03-0931
Thank you for your letter of <-~pri17, 2003, concerning the abo~-e project. We regret that you
did not pre~riously receive a comment letter from us regarding this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our
knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for
conclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project. We,
therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with
this project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic
resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
undertaking as propc~ed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
:pct and the l~dvisorv Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with
Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Furr
~oelJohnson
www.h po.dcr.state.nc.us
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4617 [phone] •733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4617 [phone] •715-4801
SURVEY 6c PLANNING 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699617 [phone] •715801

Imaact Summa
WETLAN D IMPACTS S URFAC E WATER IMPACT S
Site
No. Station (From/To) Structure Size/Type Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)* Temp. Fill
In
Wetlands Removal
of Fill in
Wetlands Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III) Fill In
SW
(Natural) Fill in
SW
(Pond) Temp.
Fill In
SW (ac) Existing
Channel
Impacted Natural
Stream
Design (ft)
1 10+91 to 11+36 RT Causewa fill 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 10+81 to 10+98 Rt Causewa fill 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTALS: 0.002 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*Site 1 - 48.28 sq. ft NCDOT
*Site 2 - 6.75 sq. ft DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DUPLIN COUNTY
WBS ELEMENT NO. 33461.1.1
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 46
NC 403 OVER WHITE OAK BRANCH

~a /
/ f
\ A.O. PATE & WIFE IRIS U. PATE ~~ ~- ~W
' \ DB 939 PG 671 1~ ,~ BEVERLY BROCK HATCH
\ PB 216 PG 82 1 ,o° OB 545 PG 383
O \\ O ~ O O m o°° °°
~ ~~~ wooDS ~ ~ O O I ~~ O `o a O
I~ QO o~ O ~ ` ALONZO DONALD PATE N~ I~ r j ~
~ 'CONSTRUCTION ~ r DB 787 PG 246 ~ ~ ~
LIMITS ITYP.I
BEGIN PAVEMENT \~ ~ 1` WOODS ti ~
\' W P °1 87'-6" - ~ BEGIN PAVEMENT
STA. 9+78,249 -L- CLASS II RIP AP ~°o ~~
~<e~ ~ % STA. 14+50 +/-
43'-9" W/ FILTER FAB~IC
F TO SR 1319 END GUARDRAIL \ TANDARD SHOULDER '~ 31'-3" 5 ' 3~ (TYPJ 1
STA, 7+00 -L- Bf~RM GUTTER (TYP.1 ,p W P *3 JASON W, & JANET M.~'
ITYP.1 ~ 12 6" ~ . STA. 10+65.7511-L- OA7ES CASHWELL
~ ! TAPER TO EXISTING
END APPR01iCH SLAB 25'-0" -' ~ new • END APPRQhCH SLAB STA. 14+00 -L- DB 1351PG I
TAPER TO EXISTING STA,9+67.452-L- ~
STA. 7+00 -L- ~ _ - - -wLe- YPJ ~ i
.. v.rtvri.~-,,,~. .. .. , . ~ .. 0 SR 1317 --
..
r~-'~-' EXISTING R/W
SITE 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
' ~ NC 403 222'BST - - - ~ - - - z -
IS Tag
- ~ • ~ _ _ _ ~20R ~ .. ~ ~ ' ' ERISTING R/W
wee- -.ct TRAFFIC BEARING DROP INLET, ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ly_0~- ~
' ~ \ STD. DwG. No.840.36 STA. 9+35.846 ~ END GUARDRAIL
- ~ ~ \ STEEL GRATE AND FRAME, ~ / ~ 1 (TYP.I titi TYPJq+OD -L-
`- - - STD. DWG. No. 840.37. (TYP.) I ~ BRIDGE ~ .~
\ ~` ~ \ 12 OFD STA. 10+22 -L- Y
1 ~ ~~ ]8"RCP CLASS 8 ~~,jf ~~~~ W.P. "2 ,~
(TYP.) RIP RAP f(_ S
\ \ W/ F. F. ~~\0P BM u2 STA. 10+09.500 -L- %b
~_
I ' ~wce.~ y~ ~ (TYPJ '-BL- STA 12+51.24' //
.~
~,~ 1 30.17 RIGHT /
I I wooDS ELEV. 110.96 / ~~
~ ~ ?/
~ 1 m / "J FIELD
1 ~ ;~j ~ WOODS ~~
~ 1~ ~ ~~ I BEVERLY BROCK HATCH
/ I ~, I PLAN DB 545 PG 383
I ti SCALE
A.O. PATE ~ WIFE IRIS U. PATE ~ ~\ ' /
.~ DB 939 PG 671 ~~a `~ !,,
PB 216 PG 82 ~
~ ~
NOTES
1. THE QUANTITY OF RIP RAP TO BE PAID FOR WILL BE THE ACTUAL 3. PILES FOR END BENT Nos.1 AND 2 SHALL BE DRIVEN TO A MINIMUM
NUMBER OF TONS OF EACH CLASS OF RIP RAP WHICH HAS BEEN BEARING CAPACITY OF 45 TONS EACH.
INCORPORATED INTO THE COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED WORK. THE RIP q, PILES FOR BENT No.] SHALL BE DRIVEN TO AN ELEVATION NO HIGHER
RAP WILL BE MEASURED BY BEING WEIGHED IN TRUCKS ON CERTIFIED THAN 83'AND SATISFY THE BEARING CAPACITY OF 45 TONS EACH.
PLATFORM SCALES OR OTHER CERTIFIED WEIGHING DEVICES. THE 5. WHEN DRIVING PILES, THE MAXIMUM BLOW COUNT SHALL NOT
QUANTITY OF RIP RAP WILL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT gE EXCEEDED.
PRICE PER TON: PROJECT NO. 8-4105
6. THE SCOUR CRITICAL ELEVATION AT BENT 1 IS 90'. COUNTY DUPLIN
PLAIN RIP RAP CLASS II 12'- 0"THICKI WITH FILTER FABRIC THESE ELEVATIONS ARE FOR USE BY MAINTENANCE FORCES TO MONITOR STATION: 10+22
END BENT N0.1 200 TONS POSSIBLE SCOUR PROBLEMS DURING THE LIFE OF THE STRUCTURE. REPLACES BRIDGE NO. 4G
7. ADT 2800 FOR YEAR 2002.
END BENT N0.2 150 TONS 8. CONSTRUCTION EMBANKMENT RELATED WAITING PERIODS ARE NOT REQUIRED. R'PRYE 0~ i00A8N C~flROlOilA
I TOTAL 350 TONS 9. THE STEEL PILES SHALL BE GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION ®L®AA4A9[RN14 ®fr 4NA~8P®AYA4~®(I~ '
1076 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFCATIONS.
2 THIS STRUCTURE HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FHWA'S n n " ,. - " nn „ euEl®w

125
~~
120 ~~~
~\
115
I10
105
BEGIN VERTICAL CONTROL
_ TAPER TO EXISTING W P tt2
STA. 7+00 -L- Sta. 10+09.50 -L-
EL.118.980 EL. 115.045
W.P. ttl
Sta. 9+78.250-L-
EL.114.983
'~ ~ ~ BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
Sta. 9+67.250 -L-
~~~~ EL. 114.961
~~
`-~__ FIX
EXISTING GROUND APPROACH SLAB
(TYP.)
~ BRIDGE
Sta. 10+22 -L-
EL. ]15.070
W.P. °3
Sta. 10+65.750 -L-
EL 115 156
END VERTICAL CONTROL
TAPER TO EXISTING
STA. 14+00 -L-
EL.122.867
. ~~
END APPROACH SLAB , ~
Sta. 10+76.750 -L- ~ ~ ~
EL.115.203 ,'
~•?% FIX
TERIAL TO
REMOVED
'P.)
HP 12 x 53 STEEL PILES
(TYP. EA. END BENT
AND BENT No.i1
100
95
90
6+00
~'12.112~
(+)0.200%
PVI = 8+96.989
EL = 114.820'
VC = 93.978'
7+00 8+00 9+00
' RAP
W/ FILTER FABRIC
(TYP.1
c+ro.2oo% ~+~2.5a~
PVI = 11+00.00
EL = 115.226'
VC = 70'
10+00 II+00
PROFILE ALONG ~ SURVEY
1"= 60' (HORIZONTAL)
1"= 6' cVERTICAL)
c~cRSO an sareo AiR'S ntm: u~ ~
nnarMOn AT D3LAPOL5640W 6110 uawuoaurawaarocnrraaraaaaawaaa
~~
~~
~~~
~~
~~
~~
~~
_~
_,_
END BENT No.l
TOP OF RIP RAP ~ EL. = 111.453
END BENT No.2
TOP OF RIP RAP ~ EL. = 111.621
12+00 13+00 14+00
PROJECT N0. 33461
COUNTY DUPLIN
STATION: 10+22
REPLACES BRIDGE NOa 46
s38AYE ®~ NOR410 CAR®dBN6
®~~AWYNAIEP~4 ®P gRAb~P®fN4A'~0®Pd
RA~EIOH
~~1~~
~~~~~~~~~~ BRIDGE tt46 ON NC 403
OVER WHITE OAK BRANCH
iiYl010if +~* ~
.Ti N0. DY DATI 2
~ taro aau
14