NC0023884_Permit Issuance_20020520

O���WAT�RQG
r_
O 'C
May 20, 2002
John C. Vest
Utilities Director
City of Salisbury
P. 0. Box 479
Salisbury, North Carolina 28145
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO023884
Yadkin River Regional WWTP
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Vest:
Division staff have reviewed and approved your renewal application for an NPDES discharge permit. Accordingly,
the Division is forwarding the subject NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between- North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
The following comments address Salisbury's concerns regarding the draft permit:
• The tables for Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements and Instream Monitoring Requirements were
separated into two Sections. The Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements are presented in Section
A. (1) and (2) and the Instream Monitoring Requirements in Section A. (3). Footnote number 2 for the
Instream Monitoring Requirements was eliminated.
• Instream monitoring requirements for NOX, NO2 and NO3 were modified as follows: the requirement for
NOX was eliminated and NO2 and NO3 will remain in the permit as NO2 + NO3. Under the current
arrangement with the Monitoring Coalition these sampling requirements are waived.
• The monitoring requirements for Tetrachloroethylene and Toluene were eliminated based on the results of a
reasonable potential analysis and the data submitted in the DMRs. These parameters do not present reasonable
potential to exceed water quality criteria but monitoring will continue through the LIMP.
• The Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) limit has been established as a daily maximum to protect for acute impacts
on the receiving waters. When using chlorine for disinfection or for cleaning of the pipes, compliance with the
limit shall be based on daily monitoring during the time when chlorine is used. On March 2001, the Division
established guidelines regarding facilities with limits for TRC. Permittees will be required to use field
instruments that can measure TRC concentrations to the lowest attainable levels. This guideline was
implemented to ensure water quality protection and compliance with 15A NCAC 2B. 0505 (d) (4). The
Division is aware that facilities will have to incur expenses related to the purchase and use of new equipment
with an attainable range of 10-15 µg/1. For this reason, the permittees are not required to use the more sensitive
instruments until July 1, 2002. The Division has no objection to the use of chlorine for the periodic cleaning of
the effluent line. The effluent must be monitored for chlorine when the cleaning takes place.
• The descriptions of the wastewater treatment facilities were corrected in the supplement to permit cover sheet.
• The Federal Rules at 40 CFR 133 (Secondary Treatment Regulations) specify the expected level of treatment
that secondary treatment facilities must achieve. Part 133.102 (a) and (b) require that the treatment facility
achieve 85 % removal of BOD5 and TSS. Since the treatment facilities function as individual facilities, each
one must be evaluated individually. The requirement to monitor influent and effluent BOD5 and TSS for each
treatment facility will evaluate compliance with this Rule. The limits for BOD5 and TSS are established at the
combined Outfall (001) and are only subject to violations at this outfall. Failure of either (or both) of the
treatment facilities to achieve 85% removal would result in a violation of a permit condition. If BOD5 or TSS
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Visit us on the INTERNET @ www.enr.state.nc.us

Issuance of NPDES Permit NC002384
Yadkin River Regional WWTP 1„
Page 2
is exceeded at Outfall 001 it will result in a violation of a permit limit. BOD5 and TSS at outfalls 002 and 003
will not be subject to violations since these parameters are not limited at these outfalls. The Division
acknowledges that both facilities have been complying with the 85% reduction and they are well maintained and
operated.
The Division agrees to the proposed location of the sampling point for Dissolved Oxygen at the effluent of the
cascade and the location of the other effluent samples at the effluent from the UV system.
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this
letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to
obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, the
Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental permit.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Teresa Rodriguez at telephone number (919) 733-
5083, ext. 595.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGN BY
-1USAN A WILSO"
Gregory J. Thorpe
cc: Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Central Files
Wupt9

Permit NCO023884
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations
promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
City of Salisbury
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from the facilities located at the
Grants Creek WWTP
1915 Grubb Ferry Road
Spencer
Rowan County
Town Creek WWTP
850 Heiligtown Road
East Spencer
Rowan County
to receiving waters designated as the Yadkin River in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, n accordance with
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, and IV
hereof.
The permit shall become effective July 1, 2002.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2004.
Signed this day May 20, 2002.
GRIGINAt SIGNED BY
S1 ISANA VfILS®N
Gregory J. Thorpe, Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

M
qAj
t
OutfaU 001
7,�
171
W
7
Yadkin River Regional WWTP
StateGridL(ILhiad. 1317NWl a)j-sbur hgittt3e�
35° 44' 07" N
Longitude:
80° 26' 50" W
Receiving Stream: Yadkin River Drainage Basin:
Yadkin
Stream Class: WS-V Sub -Basin:
03-07-04
D
` '
?c�
l
✓i-�.-..`�\-:ice � �,.
r
o,
r
71
Facility Location
not to scale
1,0
NPDES Permit No. NCO023884
North Rowan County

Permit NC0023884
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
The City of Salisbury is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate and maintain the existing 7.5 MGD Grants Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility
consisting of
➢ Influent parshall flume
➢ Four mechanical bar screens
➢ Four grit chambers
➢ Aeration basin with mechanical floating aerators and mixers
➢ Two circular clarifiers and two rectangular clarifiers
➢ Screw pump lift station
➢ Two aerobic digesters
➢ Belt filter press
➢ Standby power generator
➢ Effluent pump station
➢ Flow measurement instrumentation
This facility is located on Grubb Ferry Road near Spencer in Rowan County.
2. Continue to operate and maintain the existing 5.0 MGD Town Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility
consisting of:
➢ Two mechanical'bar screens
➢ Two grit and grease removal units
➢ Two aeration basins with fixed mechanical aerators and mixers
➢ Two secondary clarifiers
➢ Screw pump lift station
➢ Two aerobic digesters
➢ Standby power generator
➢ Flow measurement
➢ Sludge dewatering facilities
➢ Effluent pump station
This facility is located on Heiligtown Road near East Spencer in Rowan County.
3. Continue to operate and maintain an ultraviolet disinfection system, cascade post aerator, Parshall flume,
effluent sampling station and diffuser for the combined effluent from the Yadkin River Regional
WWTP, and
4. After receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division, construct and operate a 20.0 MGD
wastewater treatment system.
5. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map through Outfall 001
into the Yadkin River which is classified as WS-V waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.

Permit NCO023884
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (12.5 MGD)
(Grants Creek and Town Creek combined effluent)
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expansion beyond 12.5 MGD, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the
Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
== Monthly-
Avera a
Weekly `; .
Avera a
Daily - `
Maximum
Measurement
Fre uenc
Sample.
T e
Sample "
Location
Flow
12.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20 °C
(April 1 to October 31)
15.0 mg/L
22.5 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20 °C
(November 1 to March 31)
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 to October 31)
6.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
(November 1 to March 31)
12.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pg3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
28 µg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Silver
2/month
Composite
Effluent
Copper
2/month
Composite
Effluent
Cyanide
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity-'
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Notes:
1. Combined Effluent from Grants Creek and Town Creek
2. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/L.
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. Monitoring only applies if chlorine is added to the treatment system.
5. Chronic Toxicity limit (Ceriodaphnia) at 6.6 % with testing in March, June, September and December (see A. (6)).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0023884
A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (20 MGD)
(Grants Creek and Town Creek WWTP)
During the period beginning after expansion beyond 12.5 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Ty e
Sample Location
Flow
20 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20 °C
(April 1 to October 31
5.0 mg/L
7.5 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent and Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20 °C
November 1 to March 31
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent and Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent and Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 to October 31
1.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
November 1 to March 31
2.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen2
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pH3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine4
28 pg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Silver
2/month
Composite
Effluent
Copper
2/month
Composite
Effluent
Cyanide
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity,
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Notes:
1. Sample locations: E - Combined Effluent from Grants Creeks and Town Creek
2. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/L.
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. Monitoring only applies if chlorine is added to the treatment system for disinfection.
5. Chronic Toxicity limit (Ceriodaaphnia) at 10.5 % with tests in March, June, September and December (see A. (7)).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NCO023884
A. (3) INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Tye
Sample Location
Dissolved Oxygen
June -September
3/week
Grab
Upstream & Downstream
October -Ma
1/week
pH
June -September
3/week
Grab
Upstream & Downstream
October -May
1/week
Temperature
June -September
3/week
Grab
Upstream & Downstream
October -May
1/week
Total Phosphorus
June -September
1/month
Grab
Upstream & Downstream
NO2+NO3
June -September
1/month
Grab
Upstream & Downstream
NH3 as N
June -September
1/month
Grab
Upstream & Downstream
Total K'eldahl Nitrogen
June -September
1/month
Grab
Upstream & Downstream
Chloro h II -a
June -September
I 1/month
Grab
Downstream
Notes:
Upstream = at least 200 feet upstream of the discharge point
Downstream = 0.7 miles above Southern Railroad Bridge.
As a participant in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Association, the instream monitoring requirements as stated above are waived.
Should your membership in the agreement be terminated, you shall notify the Division immediately and the instream monitoring
requirements specified in your permit shall be reinstated.
As per 15A NCAC 2B.0505 (c) (4), stream sampling may be discontinued at such time as flow conditions in the receiving waters
or extreme.weather conditions will result in a substantial risk of injury or death to persons collecting samples. In such cases, on
each day that sampling is discontinued, written justification for the discontinuance shall be specified in the monitoring report for
the month in which the event occurred. This provision shall be strictly construed and may not be utilized to avoid the
requirements of 15A NCAC 2B.0500 when performance of these requirements is attainable-. When sampling is discontinued
pursuant to this provision, stream sampling shall be resumed at the first opportunity after the risk period has ended.
A. (4) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
(Grants Creek WWTP)
Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
treated wastewater from the Grants Creek WWTP (Outfall 002) into the combined discharge pipe. Such discharge
shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS'. ` -
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average-
Weekly
Average
Daily ' --.
Maximum'
'Measurement'
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample Location .
Flow
7.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 200C I
Daily
Composite
Influent and Effluent
Total Suspended Solids2
Daily
Composite
Influent and Effluent
Notes:
1. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).

Permit NCO023884
A. (5) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
(Town Creek WWTP)
Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
treated wastewater from the Town Creek WWTP (Outfall 003) into the combined discharge pipe. Such discharges
shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample Location
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequency.,
Type
Flow
5.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
601), 5-day, 200C 1
Daily
Composite
Influent and Effluent
Total Suspended Solids?
Daily
Composite
Influent and Effluent
Notes:
1. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
A. (6) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly) at 12.5 MGD
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 6.6 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or
"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent
versions. The tests will be performed during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent
sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit,
then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as
described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or
subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does
have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic
Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the
pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the
following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days
after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
(continued on next page)

Permit NCO023884
A. (6) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly) at 12.5 MGD (continued)
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility
name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the
comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited
above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be
required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid
test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following
the month of the initial monitoring.
A. (7) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly) at 20 MGD
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 10.5 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or
"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent
versions. The tests will be performed during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent
sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit,
then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as
described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or
subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does
have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase 11 Chronic
Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests wgre performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the
pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the
following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days
after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
(continued on next page)

Permit NCO023884
A. (7) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly) at 20 MGD (continued)
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility
name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the
comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited
above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be
required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid
test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following
the month of the initial monitoring.

,February 28, 2002
� iJ
Mr. Rex Gleason
NC Department of E
Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street]
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
_1
MAR C 4 2002
Subject: City of Salisbury
NPDES NC 0023884
Grant Creek WWTP
January 2002
Enclosed with this letter you will find charts and tables, which contain data to explain the
occurrences at the City of Salisbury WWTP's. In 1999 the UV disinfection channel and
diffuser in the Yadkin River was put into operation, at that time Grant Creek WWTP
began discharging into the Yadkin River. In 2000 the Town Creek WWTP began
discharging into this line. Graphs of the last six months combined monthly averages for
TSS and the individual plant average TSS indicates a trend that lead to the non-
compliance for January 2002.
Each individual plant has TSS concentrations below the permitted average of the NPDES
permit. Due to the high flows in January on the 23, 24, and 25, solids seemed to be
scoured off the pipeline to the UV system. The individual plants experienced higher
flows but were able to maintain the solids in the plants, which is indicated on the charts
enclosed. Our only explanation is that the pipe was beginning to shed the biofilm during
December with the higher numbers on the combined effluent and then with the high flows
in the pipeline during January this cleaned the pipe out. The combined effluent TSS for
February 2002 to this week averaged 22.7 mg/1. This indicates that the pipe has been
cleaned out and the solids are below the December monthly average of 27.1 mg/l.
To maintain better control and to prevent this from occurring in the future the staff of the
WWTP's believes that scheduled chlorination of these lines from the plant sites to the
UV disinfection channel will help eliminated this in the future. The current NPDES
permit does not have a chlorine residual stated since UV is our primary disinfectant. By
this letter we are requesting permission to chlorinate these two lines from the plant sites
to the UV channel and then dechlorinate the effluent to reduce the residual to 0.028mg/1
SALISBURY-ROWAN UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION
100 W. Innes St., The Plaza, Suite 301, Salisbury, NC 28144; P.O. Box 479, Salisbury, NC 28145-0479
Phone: [phone]; Fax [phone]

Page 2
as is stated in the current draft permit as the maximum residual allowed in the
discharge. The City of Salisbury would like to start this procedure in March 2002
before the solids build back up on the pipe. The time it will take to complete this
task is unknown.
The combined effluent for the WWTP's did not meet the weekly average of
45mg/1 or the 85 percent removal efficiency required for the month of January
2002 for the above stated reasons. However the individual plant performance
indicates that this was achieved for each facility just not after the flows are
combined. If you or you staff has any other advise or any questions concerning
the information enclosed with this letter, please call me at 704-638-5371 or the
plant operations at 704-638-5374.
Sincerely,
Barbara Sifford
Compliance Coordinator
Pc: John Vest
Matt Bernhardt
Randy Cauble
Mike Frick-ORC

Jan-02
.Date
TC MGD
TC TSS
GC MGD
GC TSS
Total MGD Total'TSS
1-Jan
1.84
3.03
4.87
2-Jan
2.03
8
3.53
19.5
5.56
15
3-Jan
1.92
9.3
3.76
20.3
5.68
18
4-Jan
2.16
8
2.8
16
4.96
17.8
5-Jan
.2.17
3.12
5.29
6-Jan
2.59
4.13
6.72
7-Jan
2.36
13
4.2
24
6.56
74
8-Jan
2.34
17
3.84
15
6.18
30
9-Jan
2.2
14
3.83
16
6.03
23
10-Jan
2.32
8
3.27
18.5
5.59
27
11-Jan
2.22
12.5
3.47
30
5.69
42 -
12-Jan
2.19
3.6
5.79
13-Jan
2
3.13
5.13
14-Jan
2.08
5.7
3.7
15
5.78
25.5
15-Jan
2.14
16
3.58
17
5.72
14
16-Jan
2.2
10.3
3.54
19
5.74
23.3
17-Jan
2.17
9
3.62
18.5
5.79
32.3
18-Jan
2.09
5.7
3.63
19
5.72
31
19-Jan
3.72
5.01
8.73
20-Jan
3.72
5.91
9.63
21-Jan
3.13
4.54
7.67
22-Jan
2.82
20
4.51
13.5
7.33
27.3
23-Jan
6.43
8.5
7.41
14.5
13.84
34.5
24-Jan
4.53
11.5
7.78
32.5
12.31
57.5
25-Jan
4.31
14.5
7.18
24.5
11.49
115
26-Jan
3
4.67
7.67
27-Jan
2.55
4.13
6.68
28-Jan
2.67
10.5
4.3
23.5
6.97
82
29-Jan
2.33
8
4.34
31
6.67
22.8
30-Jan
2.4
5.5
4.45
18.5
6.85
61
31-Jan
2.28
12.5
4.32
16
6.6
63
From this you can easily see plant performance to Combined Total concentrations

1SIZE I '
;1f,S�' St �iiERNIMM-101,
,m".m.
M.ON
&
•.%Y
� F"
�',� iF't '.iR? • . i ..�� � jj�'� � tf h
a�J'r�4�ii. Y k � :'y ':S��pSi cI��1�1��rX'ssa�ti�'."�A �� !ti
.a, f` sw � a+':. 2•-! 5'!ki f'•.'�Fc$f �, 04;,3 1 �''
����draYi� „"��'h1a �F4,r�Y E�'•µt'� [fk F4.1�i.'7�3t \k4; Ac}�5. �7t. ,"-i•'(f .. 1,.
(. k� `Di i 'xYr ' 9 rtte,�.'J. �' ti'.y Yxi a.. �. �� � .. � U!' i' � ;,�a.
.
ry ;f a S°e
a .S '�� frgfe'-9
M4.
:. ataxy ;; 1• 4
i i 7 ,. a i
N f
y�,'y�'2J'�p��� •�, •
^^'+ly� }i' {' {}ti
J I e n 7 ' 4J � 3 a s E Fib'• S.-s' S.Y
-'W 4 'M�',ftr t � �1�. �rY f��..'ryrLL.�.•Si9�}��'S$�l"a
i'�t7Lra fir.
d.. 'iC I�Lf '�s aw`F' L � , Fil f'�``i' .11 �
y 1 P ""I'V if '• `'FJIi 5 ���{ }� - 'r t
�,�.qt I F^� �.,� :A Y'i5f kY� 3 s �• J �" (r+� +s, rat - �;y
v �• �.E.d. ��-. ��.i.C'y L•'Y 'r �. i`_ � � ��

Z,DES NO: NC0023884 EFFLUENT
t --- DISCHARGE NO: 001
FACILITY NAME: Citv Of Salisbury - Grant Creek WWTP MONTH, January
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC): CLASS: IV YEAR, 2002
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES: (I) Grant's Creek Regional WW rp Laboratory 2 COUNTY: Rowan
-�- GRADE: IV
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PHONE [phone]
()Environment One
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: (3)
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES PERSONS) COLLECTING SAMPLES: (4)
WWTP Plant Personnel
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCDWQ -DENR X (%� �"� ZA��^✓ Z-Z� OL__
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER (SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE)
RALEIGH, N.C. 27699-1617 BY THIS SIGNATURE, I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS DATE
ACCURATE AND CONIPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
50050 00400 50060 00310 00610 00530 EFFLUENT PACE
FLOW 31616 00300 00600
IY00665 00625 00630 TGP3B
EFF; 00010
17,
p U
U
c
Z
< � U
O F
< vi
��
v Z F=
� p L
O
O
Z _. L
U-
�
-' +
F
p
HRS HRS Y/B/N
MCD Deg C 07.0 UNITS
1 24" 4.87
hIG/L MG/L
hIG/L MG/L
N/IOONIL
2 07:0 24 Y 5.56 10.9 7
6
.,
MG/L MG/L MC/L
'New,:,y>'sD
eaa. Holida, +:::.
h1C/L 'VIGIL /
3 07:0 4 Y� { 5 68 TO 9 :-• 6:8
5 7
0.5 15.0
21
10.4
4 07:0 24 y4.96 9.8
5:7
s '03 ..:1�0
. ,...,: ?0
=L0 6 <s•=
5Y; 0.7,i0 �24 _ -':::- : „`5.?9 . 6 -8
5.1
0.4 17.8
8
10.8
; i
.. ;
6.56 .10.6 6.7
8 07:0 24 Y 6.18 11.1 6:8
17.:0
0.6:. 74.0
14
98
9 07-_ ri
-24'_�: ';.Y . = 6.03 _.:10:8. .. 6:7
T.
0.430.0
13
,-
9.7
. •
l 0 07:0 24 Y 5.59 1 1.6 6.8
.. Z:5
_ 0.4 . •23.0
;: 7
..:9:6 "::: . I4.0
_
1'1'= 07:0 24`_ . ,.Y.s -*, 5.69 1:310 :`.:.:>:
9.3
':;-,-` ':'
0.1 27.0
7
.2.1'2 .:
9.6
5:3 8..Z2 ::..
-68
12 07:0 24 Y
T2:0
.0 11'` -;;:'42:0
I3:07:0 =24 .3
14 07:0 24 Y 5.78 12.0 6 9
IS 07:0 �24" :° Y ` 5 72 °6
2
94
,
16 07:0 24 Y 5.74 I 1 7 6.8
14:0 ;:
s s 8.0 <0.1 23.3
LT. 07 0 _zi24"y, `.'S79 9
_p
9.7
18 07:0 24 Y 5.72 12.3 6.9
32:3
L1
:9.3
19' 07.:24;`:...-:. ;.. 8 73 ;.....
12.6
0.2 31.0
39
9.2
9.63
2T` 07:0
22 07:0 74 Y 7 33 ] 0 0 6 9
9.3
" ` 's HoIida r
0.4 27.3 �.. ,.._
-H` 84 12 0 k s=
24 07:0 24 .:6.7 :_:
Y
6
9:3 ;^::.'.0-7:._.:34:5
9.5
12.31 12.8 6.5
25' 0.7`_0 -24
0.8 57.5
_
-
...�'-;` 11-f49. r 13:9 = 6:7 . v :. --,:: : _..14.3
26 07:0 24 Y 22:8 ';>.
0 7 ;:1:15.0 : =
13 10.3
7.67
127
...::21'
..;::;:....:_
28 07:0 24 y 6.97 12.5 6.8
9 0.7:0 24' - :6.67...•,.132
17.0
1.4
30 07:0 24 g 6.85 14.2 6.7
5.9
I.1 22:8 •
13
: =9.8 ,,..
1 070 24 ...,,B . • ; 6:60 `- 15.1 ::.: 6:9 ^ <.-
73
9 5
`1.3
:
'AVERAGE 6.94 -� •-12.0
.:, 123
6
9:3
MAXIMUM 13.84 15.1 6.9 <p.05
r"--"A
10.6
22.8
0.5 39:8.
11
9.8 14.0 2.12
NIMUM - 7.. _...9.8 6.5 :<0.05 :...5.1
14 115:0
14.0 2.12
Comp-(C) / Grab(G) G
0.0 14.0
5.3 8.72 P
C C
;•.v
PermicL'imit, 12 :5� :_;�_..
C
6.0-9.0.-...._
'30.0 12.0 •30.0 .2 0 .
C C C C
C C .
2/28/2002

- .LrrLUL{ 1V 1
N. DES NO: NCO023884 DISCHARGE NO: 001 MONTH: January YEAR: 2002
FACILITY NAME: City of Salisbury - Grant Creek WWTP CLASS: IV COUNTY: Rowan
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC): Mike Frick GRADE: IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES: (1) Grant's Creek Regional W)VTP Laboratory (2) Environment One
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED ❑ (3) (4)
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: WWTP Plant Personnel
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIV. OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT X -`, -G�
NCDWQ - DENR (SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER BY THIS SIGNATURE, I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEIGH, N.C. 276919-1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
EFFLUENT PAGE
00340
00720
THP3B
34475
34481
01077
01027
01042
01051
01067
01092
71900
F
in
Z
Y
U
O
U
U
r;
U >'
o
"
_
<
U
u
z
�
F
U
F [E-f]
o
F•
F
Q
F
O
F
O
<
p
F
FO
F-
F
O
F
F
F-
MG/L
uG/I
%
uG/I
uG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
uG/L
:-NOWIRt
2
35.0
<10.0
<0.2
44
'.:.CY.y�.7�':� .�+1��5."
.n,�-'.-,.�
�«. r.-I.r
4�.:
�
gXY�
.as��•
d ..,s. ?.
+vR.: T:.l,...
w4..-
��,1.wC...., "F-•
-4ae T. .T� a�L
y y
6
:'.`4` .7.:--� �Y..-i
s `w='
•''Six
.: _+:x,
i._. &
Y. '"�.�`
-
mF-
�.,-�''."P's-
Y �1
Lc ars.
T cam' R
n%5'''; �;•
8
67.0
<10.0
__. �,
.
_,.
-r
=.a_o�l
<o ool
<oo
<o:aio
;:<.<000s
: :o_o�
.� <02
10
51.0
,4 '.�b..�:f5-ri+r`'.''°� `,��-'
'-
�`�
�-� c -�•
*��,t
{�-�ec.<=�'�+:yw`r��
'�
.5`.3-?:!_
�F`L-
r ` �r,�
F �r�',-+� Y
.,✓
_ k
u_ � ,�'
12
0
WL"
S
"�. g
``:f?-
'w�.a
:./ S
Sh
1,
Tj:.
,y
e 1•J +'.L
Srs'r k
l
:'�i-K .:�L
.l!.;Y!,
.Xv�
na- .Ss�."';'�..
%�..
-iai.'x-„ ,5.(
,c.
.. i?G..,+ •Y"„'
.:.-?F�Fi
.:Y
14
ui. �a�k�
Via.
N
?ra -
A�
onn
16
rs��7i�'�`�
.S .. .. .....!'�'G.:S
:0.
�xa
,'}a ,- '�...
L..�...,
t/ne
..-" ,..
ti
...: ...t
<�
..�: .�..:..
-_ .�,-::.
°v c
>,rs..:+v,
e
<>x..s._z. ,
�s: r
' .��ar �...���%
rm�>x
�18
Trm%%7.-3'L'-`
..J-.r'i'
i�"Y'=
20
-:R. i .ic r"i
.rT+: •M1. •1
,F' �'�'<•
r
:
T_'- .:.. i
�ii :
:'=�:�14}+
•
:L1611 y
-
=:
O�'�=h'[.:.`...
_ a
MX
22
50.0
<10.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.2
2 F iMMF
F
�N
!WW
!�<QWU
MN
POM
I3:ix1.0
9
6
'
..
.'C
,�0
R
24
78.0
.: =� v+i • %'}�-a+iw
�.
na r
r
/J
Sp `y j..::
��+..'•,C-�Y
Y'�4`-� �
}.�•'
,�,f?f�. D>+
- �x'S�✓-�
vi`• tA��Si� .
26
_�, Vti'�r^n.,:T.i :..-3,. T
-N--4e4��E .-u ..-�'
ti:2al c.^.i^-
Y
��,t ZF
:.Y=lr:�
�w
(,�y.�•""l�y
,.R[.''.M.+bNOT�YD:
t
.'?i
�,,�f'�'_
ii!L.��i+t-�i.'s
,� v l
r,{•"i�s�7 ;f
.}' 4
1 'l�,'.X.
✓y"'�?.k
`.ive.'1
ait �J?'Sj;
.mow... .S
iZ J F
�
�._`yK
�N`3%i',
28
1 2(�,
;r'$1.0
u<L0t0
..•"..:
- ., :
y...
r
x?s,
t L. * {
7 t
' a
"r a .
<0:2
30
'n3L,
93:0
%, A RAGE :: _;:
a`.56.1
= ...is.0:0
=i'"c,'` :
#DIY/o
0.0
? : <0.0
<1.0
`= • 0.0
<1.0
c"0.001
0.001
''S.0.1000
<0.001
-0.00
<0.10
�0:000
<0.010
<0:010
�`0.000
<0.005
0.07
0.07
<0.2
MAXIMUM
93.0
<10.0
*1VII1!TIMIIM ,;
= 35:0
' ;'=<L0:0
>.�rr ;
0.0
' : <1:0
.;:<1:0
.- ..
.0.001
fy<0:001
_ n ,`ftr, s
F_O:1Q
<0.005
. 0.06
; ..<0:2
Comp-(C) / Grab(G)
C
G
C
G
G
C
_ 5
C
C
C
C
C
C
2/28/2002 Jan02 ac.xls. GRANT EFF

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and -sampling frequencies meet permit requirements ❑
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet -permit requirements
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc., and
a timetable for improvements to be made.
.Grants combined effluent is noncompliant for January because the TSS exceeds the weekly average permit limit during the
Grant Greek WWTP TSS average dmme the thud and fourth week -was 2125 and 2225 The Town Creek WWTP TSS
average drupe the third and fourth week was 13.63 and 9.13. The combined e$loent TSS for the third and fourth week was
58.58 and 57.20. Due to the hilt flows we had some type of pipe scour in the Town and Grant combined effluent lines I
have asked our compliance coordinator to contact the State seeking permission to do a study on chlorinating both Town and
Grant combined effluent lines. We want to determine if the TSS problem could -be -caused by biological growth.
All BODs on 1/17 &.1/18 did not meet standard OC of 167.5 228.5 mg/1 Std. were 140 and 155 mg/L All BODs on l/29
and 1/30 did not meet blank OC of < 0.2 mg/L Blank were all 0.4 mg11
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were.prepared.under my -direction or supervision in accordance with
a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
Pin or Pew who manage the system, or those persons directly responmble for gathering the information, the information submitted is,
to the best of my knowledge and belied true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Michael West
Permittee (Please PK "fit our type)
Siguattae of Permitt6c
(Rely)
400 North Church St Salisbury N.C. 28144 [phone] July 31 1998 Grant
Permittee Address Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00625 Total Ywdhal Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 BOD
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended
Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
01027 Cadmium
01032 Hexava lent Chromium
01034 Chromium
00665 Total Phosphorus
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
PARAMETER CODES
00951 Total Fluoride
01002 Total Arsenic
01092 Zinc
01105 Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium
31616 Fecal. Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
01037 Total Cobalt
01042 Capper
01045 Iron
01051 Lead
01062 Molybdenum
01067 Nickel 50060 Total
01077 Silver Residue
00082 Color (ADMI) Chlorine
00095 Conductivity
71880 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
Parameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source ComplianceTtiforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting the
Water Quality Section's web site at h20.enr.state.nc.us/was and linking to the Unit's information pages.

INFLUENT
NPDES NO: NC0023884 DISCHARGE NO: 001 MONTH: January YEAR: 2002
FACILITY NAME: City of Salisbury - Grant Creek WWTP COUNTY: Rowan
00400
00310
00530
00340
00625
00720
34481
34475
22417
71900
_
U
U
u
�
❑
w
c
NQ
,c_
OF
7_7
Z
U
�
O
o
a w
O�
�F
F
w
?
�
F
C)STD
HRS
UNITS
MG/L
IVIG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
uG/L
uG/I
uG/1
uG/L
-4 -
.1 } t
G
08.00
-6_ t'
'24 *
w'
r
�P'r .{_•
t
i1c �....
��, W
:fi f1
xF
.%
a
: A'
=�._s.
x l ,,, Ia env Years$Day'Hol> da• ,
_
r ,rrr
�:.
�,
2
08:00
24
168.0
154.0
394
<0.2
5"0
4
08:00
24
172.0
220.0
425
+.:K, CI
.it
6
08:00
24
08:00
.;.'24.
Y.:
- =
"'155.0.
,. .;r--:200:0
8
08:00
24
141.0
208.0
432
0.4
`9,<=
0800
r : 24_ -
152.0
``
> 226.0
455,-
10
08:00
24
163.0
230.0
493
il'
08 00
::24 _ -
--: 219.0
;
216.0.
'
669
12
08:00
24
13,
08?00
__ 24
14
08:00
24
171.0
170.0
535
15.
08:00
24. '
:;=17T.0
...:
;196.p
.:
395
,
0.3
16
08:00
24
210.0
336.0
591
08:00
24
183.0
=
1060.0
590
08:00
24
201.0
372.0
560
k2O
08:00
24
V
H6lida`
22
08:00
24
142.0
170.0
483
<0.2
23
"08100
,24'°;:,�.1_.,:
_
�155:'020.0
.
: 535.
24
08:00
24
92.0
132.0
278
25'i
°08 00.
:24 _
?121:0
:_
::116:0
343
26
08:00
24
28
08:00
24
148.0
128.0
373
:.29.
'000::.:-
24 <�:
r:. ;�=-'1710
.. _
_.:.:
437
30
08:00
24
166.0
120.0
375
31`
;085.,19,4
a.,i
0
S ,
:5=v ,
r485
3. �.,
'':.kht
.cam
f;'�
:3�
y J
r i.L�
&:1;...•Y
•;:
:Average � is
w
=169:0
'e _,
:.
+245:0
r��4
:.
`�467
a####>`>
;#DIY/OI
####
####'
#fir`##:
- ;x0:1
Monthly Maximum
0.0
255.0
1060.0
669
<1.0
<0.01
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.4
It,00.0
m
2
T
,8-Montv`
,1`07
:2
Sample Type: C or C
G
C
C
C
C
G
G
G
I G
C
2/28/2002 Jan02_gc.xis, GRANT INF

[Pwd; [Your voice mail message regarding four major municipal NC NPDESpermits]]
Subject: [Fwd: [Your voice mail message regarding four major municipal NC NPDESpermits]]
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:33:51 -0500
From: Dave Goodrich <[e-mail]>
To: Mike Templeton <[e-mail]>,
Teresa Rodriguez <[e-mail]>
CC: Mike Myers <[e-mail]>
On the good news side -- Teresa - you can go ahead and issue Salisbury.
Mike T. -
I'm not sure what she's looking for, but could you call her and find
out?
Thanks.
- Dave
Subject: Re: [Your voice mail message regarding four major municipal NC NPDES permits]
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 16:19:26 -0500
From: [e-mail]
To: Dave Goodrich <dave.goodrich @ ncmail. net>
CC: [e-mail]
Dave,
You requested a status update on four North Carolina NPDES major
municipal permits currently on hold. The status of these four NPDES
permits are given below:
NCO055786 - City of Lexington WWTP - missing effluent data
This permit is on hold due to insufficient characterization of the
proposed discharge's effluent quality. Effluent data has been requested
to gauge whether reasonable potential exists to include effluent limits
and/or monitoring within this NPDES permit.
NCO026573 - City of Morganton WWTP - not yet received by EPA - Region 4
NCO024112 - City of Thomasville WWTP - missing effluent data
This permit is on hold due to insufficient characterization of the
proposed discharge's effluent quality. Effluent data has been requested
to gauge whether reasonable potential exists to include effluent limits
and/or monitoring within this NPDES permit.
NCO023884 - Grants Creek WWTP - complete
A no -comment letter has been sent to North Carolina DENR regarding this
draft permit.
Hope this helps.
Caroline Ejimofor
NPDES and Biosolids Permits Section
Permits, Grants and Technical Assistance Branch
EPA Water Management Division
e-mail address: [e-mail]
phone number: 404-562-9309
fax number: 404-562-8692
1 of 2 4/11/02 2:24 PM

Yadkin River Regional WWTP - NPDES permit NCO023884
Subject: Yadkin River Regional WWTP - NPDES permit NC0023884
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 08:08:30 -0400
From: Teresa Rodriguez <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]
This e-mail is in response to the letter from EPA received on June 20, 2001, regarding the draft permit for
the Yadkin River Regional WWTP. Comments regarding specific issues to the City of Salisbury's permit
will be answered here, other comments regarding programatic issues will be answered separately.
A summary of EPA's specific concerns and the State responses are as follows:
1. EPA comment: The City of Salisbury did not obtain an NPDES permit prior to the relocation and
comingling of the discharges and is therefore discharging wastewater without an NPDES permit.
Response: The previous permit issued on April 1, 1996 to the City of Salisbury for the Grant Creek WWTP
included effluent limitations for the expansions to 12.5 MGD and 20 MGD. A waste load allocation was
performed on January 1996 to determine the appropriate limits for the expansions to 12.5 MGD and 20
MGD. The 12.5 MGD expansion comprised the comingling of the discharges into the common effluent
pipe and the ultraviolet disinfection system. Once the expansion to 12.5 MGD was completed the City
started operating under the Grant
Creek permit effluent limitations and monitoring requirements for 12.5 MGD.
2. EPA comment: The fact sheet for the draft Yadkin River Regional WWTP does not include information
on the expansion of the discharge from 12.5 MGD to 20 MGD as well as the appropiate antidegradaton
documentation.
Response: Both expansions, the 12.5 MGD and the 20 MGD were addressed in 1996 and were included in
the previous permit. Antidegradation policy,including public review and input, was followed in the
development of the permit. The City of Salisbury met the requirements of the State Environmental Policy
Act and received a Finding of No Significant Impact from the Department prior to being permitted for the
combined discharge and expansion.
3. EPA comment: The proposed permit represents an expanded discharge and an antidegradation analysis is
required before the issuance of the permit to the Yadkin River Regional WWTP.
Response: As stated in response to comment 2. the State's antidegradation policy was followed in the
development of the previous permit in which the expansion was allowed.
4. EPA comment: The fact sheet does not contain pretratment language, the permit should be revised to
include pretreatment language in accordance with 40 CFR 122.440).
Response: Pretreatment language is part of the boiler plate that is attached to all permits for facilities that
have pretreatment programs.
Please advise us if further clarifications are needed or if we can proceed with the issuance of the permit.
Thanks,
Teresa Rodriguez
1 of 1 4/11/02 1:24 PM

JUN-20-01 iS=01 FROM=EPA ENV. JUSTICE I1)=404 SS2 SSB4 PAGE 1/7
AU T 'LJNI i E0 STI A i E
o ���
k,
�= i`,{i'•ti-' ; � �. ��aT F'c, Fv>:"�1���7i��5 ;3'l�:J;-.i `�r�'.:.ii
Ms. Coleell Sullins
Water (duality Section Chief
NC Dept. of Environment and
Natural Resources
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
SUBJECT, Potential Objection to NPDES Permit
City of Salisbury, Yadkin River Regional WWTP
NCO023884
Dear M(s. Sullins:
In accordance with the EPA/North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources MENR) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), we have completed our review of the
proposed National Pollutant Discharge EIimination System (NPDES) permit for the City of
Salisbury, Yadkin River Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP). EPA provides the
following potential objections regarding this proposed. permit.
1) An NPDES permit is required for any discharge of pollutants from any point source into r1
Waters of the United States in accordance with 40 CFR §.122-1(b). The proposed Yadkin
River Regional WWTP permit consolidates the coverage of tvm existing facilities, which
were previously sepazately permitted, into one permit. The Town Creek and Grant Creek
/TP's now comingle their discharge into one Wluent pipe which discharges to the
Yadldn River, with ultraviolet disinfection and aT- effluent diffuser added to the new
outf'all. This combined discharge began. on September 1, 2000, according to the fact sheet
attached to the proposed permit. In addition., the Town Creek WWTP NPDES permit
was recinded on January 25', 2001- An NPDES-permit was not obtained prior to the
relocation and comingling of the discharges from these two facilities and therefore the City
of Salisbury is cuirentIy discharging pollutants into Waters of the United States without an
NPDES permit.
2) A brief summary of the basis for the draft permit conditions, including references to
applicable statutory or regulatory provisions must be included in every fact sheet
supporting a draft pen-fiit in accordance with 40 CFR §,122.8(b)(4). The fact'sheet for the
draft Yadkin River Regional WWTP does not include information on the expansion of the
discharge from 12.5 MGD to 20.0 MGD as well as the appropriate antideg,radation
docume, Cation.
sntomst Yddmss {;J?Q hk'�:!!v�mt•.a�, Gov
RE::gc.;grg�W9C%C;t17:a�•r': .!h'o4.n'. )!eOil,Btme.jhksC!';': % .^•ub.:......�;���:

JUN-20-01 16:01 FROM=EPA ENV. JUSTICE ID=404 562 9664 PAGE 2/7
3) The State is required per 40 CFR § 13.1.12 to develop and implement an antidegradation
policy. This policy applies to new and expanded dischar(Yes. This proposed permit
represents an expanded discharge, and combines the discharge of two existing facilities
and. relocates the discharge point to form one new facility discharge. Federal regulations
require that an appropriate antidegradation analy:is be performed before the issuance of an
NP)DES permit to the Yadkin River Regional WWTP. Additionally, the public notice
should include a reference to any antidegradation determination.
4) Pretreatment language is required in ail permits of PubIically Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs) which have significant industrial users (SrUs)- The fact sheet supporting the
proposed permit identifies fourteen (14) SIUs for this facility, but does not contain
- pretreatment language. The permit should be revised to include the appropriate
pretreatment Ian guage in accordance with 40 CFR § 122.44(j). Additionally, the previous
permit included pretreatrnent'Ianguage_ According 40 CFR §122-44(1), all reissued
permits should be issued with at least as stringent Iimits as the previous permit, unless
certain conditions are met, ft appears that none of the conditions allowing a permit to be
reissued without more stringent Iimits have been addressed and therefore the perrni.t
�. should be revised to include pretreatment language.
.All POTWs are required, unless impracticable, to include average weekly and average
monthly discharge limitations- The draft permit does not include an average weekly
NH;-N limitation, which EPA believes is a practicable and necessary Iimit. The permit
should be revised to include this average weekly limit in accordance with 40 CFR
§ 122-45(d)(2)-
Fact sheets supporting proposed NTDES permits are required to include a description of
the procedures for reaching a final decision on the draft permit, including: the beginning
and ending dates for the comment period and the address where comments will be
received, procedures for requesting a hearing, and the nature of the hearing as well as any
�the:r procedures by which the public may partici ate in the final decision. This
information is missing from the fact sheet and must be included per 40 CFR §124.8(b)f}_
e application received for this facility, in accordance with 40 CFR §123-43(a)(1), does
n t provide the effluent characteristic information required in the EPA application
Is andard form A which would be applicable to this facility- 40 CFR §122.21(a)(2)(iv) and
0 CFR § 123-25(a) mandate that permit applications used by the State require at a
minimum the information required in EPA application forms. Therefore, EPA has
determined that the application used to develop the proposed Yadkin River Regional
WNN'TP was inadequate and a complete application including an evaluation of effluent
characteristics is needed prior to the issuance of this permit. EPA Standard Form A has
been attached for your reference- The revised application should be reviewed with
respect to 40 CFR §122.44(d) and North Carolina's November 17, 2000, Reasonable
Potential procedures, for any numeric limits which may be necessary. Please note that the
2

'JUN-2J-01 16:02 FROM=EPA ENV. JUSTICE I0:404 562 SSS4 PAGE 3/7
State is authorized to accept Standard .Form A from POTW's until the State authority to
accept Form 2A becomes effective in August, 2001 _
In accordance with the MOA and 40 CFR §123.43 (c)(2)(0), EPA requests that DENR
respond to these concerns and provide copies of any revised proposed permit, fact sheet, and
complete application for EPA review prior to final permit issuance. Please note that if these
comments are not addressed, EPA will object to the issuance of the NPDES permit. If you have
any questions, please contact Ms. Caroline Ejimofor of my staff at 404/562-9309_
cc= John C. Vest, Utilities Director
City of Salisbury
Sincerely,
_Carol Kemker, Acting Chief
Permits, Grants, & Technical Assistance Branch
Water Manuaeinent Division
:3

June 11, 2001
Teresa Rodriguez
NPDES Unit
NC-DENR- DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: City of Salisbury
Yadkin River Regional WWTP
NPDES No. NCO023884
Dear Ms. Rodriguez:
L
U
O cc
o
O
w a
4
H
Z
xz
W O
o C-
c
I
This correspondence addresses questions and items for clarification as stated in the permit draft.
1. Additional monitoring of the effluent for nutrients was increased from monthly to weekly as outlined
in the Yadkin River Nutrient Management Strategy. As noted in footnote 6 on the Instream
Monitoring Requirements Page, the quantitation levels are assumed to apply only to instream analyses
and not for the level required for monitoring of the effluent discharge. (Drrt d
2. On the instream monitoring, if NOX is required, why are NO2 and NO3 listed separately? Footnote 6
Ic,LL has them added together. This requirement needs additional clarification if the City should decide to
perform these monitoring requirements instead of the Basin Association. If this requirement is added to
mil° �2 f �03 the Memorandum of Agreement for the Yadkin River Basin Association, further clarification is also
needed. The holding time for NO3 is only 48 hours, due to the instability of the compound. This is an
ton' unnecessary and burdensome requirement for delivery and lab analyses. The Instream Monitoring
Table should not have the heading of Effluent Characteristics for the parameters to be reported for the
stream. If footnotes were listed on the Monitoring page they apply to, it would clarify any
interpretation for the future. It would also be helpful to define what is meant by "quantitation level'.
Is this method detection limit (MDL) or method quantitation limit (MQL) or practical quantitation
limit (PQL)? This definition will determine the achievable detection level of concentration that would
be reported for stream analyses.
3. There are monitoring requirements in the current permit for tetrachloroethylene and concentration
limits for toluene. Included with this letter are copies of the page of the DMRs for 2000 and 2001 with
these results. If a Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) is evaluated for these two compounds, no
limits and no monitoring would be required in the new permit. Industrial monitoring for these
,�4P compounds will continue for each SIU. The LTMP will evaluate the treatment efficiency for these
D,,,, P compounds in each treatment facility. The current permit states that an evaluation for these
compounds may be completed after 12 months. Data has been submitted for 1998, 1999, 2000 and
2001. Monitoring on a quarterly basis would not provide a substantial amount of additional data points
to determine compliance.
CITY OF SALISBURY
UTILITIES MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION
400 N. CHURCH ST., SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA 28144 PHONE: [phone], FAX: [phone]

2
p 4.
OCFR ,'33
The City of Salisbury will continue to monitor cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel, and mercury for each
individual treatment facility as required in the Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP). The State should
be commended for the evaluation of Reasonable Potential Analyses (RPA) to determine the
applicability of effluent limitations for these toxicants. This is a tremendous monitoring cost that has
been eliminated in the operational cost of a WWTP.
The combined effluent is disinfected by an ultraviolet (UV) system. Should this system fail,
disinfection would be accomplished by sodium hypochlorite or HTH tablets. While repairs are being
made to the UV system, residual chlorine can be analyzed with current laboratory equipment to a
detection level of 50ug/l. The limit of 28ug/l should be applicable if chlorine is used on a continuous
basis for more than 30 days. The Division of Water Quality would be notified of any such instance to
discuss and approve interim sampling requirements.
The following corrections and additions need to be made to the "Supplement To Permit Cover Sheet".
The Grant Creek WWTP with an existing capacity of 7.5 MGD consists of four mechanical bar
screens, four grit chambers, aeration basin with mechanical floating aerators and mixers, two
circular clarifiers and two rectangular clarifiers, a screw pump lift station, two aerobic digesters,
OK d belt filter press, standby power generation, effluent pump station, influent parshall flume and
flo
w measurement instrumentation. The combined discharge is treated by the UV disinfection and dascade post aeration discharged through an instream effluent diffuser. Currently the primary
clarifiers and trickling filters are not in operation. The dissolved air flotation unit has been
removed and replaced by the belt filter press for sludge dewatering on site.
The Town Creek WWTP has an existing capacity of 5.0 MGD consisting of two mechanical bar
screens, two grease and grit removal units, two aeration basins with fixed mechanical aerators and
mixers, two secondary clarifiers, a screw pump lift station, two aerobic digesters, standby power
generation, flow measurement, effluent pump station and force main and sludge dewatering on
site.
A
spermitis unique in that it has two individual treatment facilities that are combined into one
uent discharge for compliance monitoring. The combined outfall is listed as Outfall 001. It is the
opinion of the City that only the combined outfall effluent limitations be considered for enforceable
requirements. The quality of the effluent as it enters the receiving stream is how compliance with this
permit should be determined. Each facility will be properly operated and maintained as an individual .
treatment system. The efficiency of each treatment unit as to reduction of BODS and TSS should not
�o a be an enforceable limit. To operate the facilities and understand the loading and operation of each
plant, these parameters need to be done on a daily basis as would be required for an individual
discharge as they have been in the past. The compliance of each individual plant and of the combined
effluent could result in duplicate violations for the same effluent parameter, such as TSS. The
important factor in the receiving stream is the 30-day average and the 7-day average of the combined
effluent at Outfall 001, since that represents the loading to the receiving stream and any potential to
impact water quality of the receiving stream.
The City has complied with the 85% removal for BOD and TSS in previous permits for Town Creek
and Grant Creek WWTPs. Continued monitoring and reporting of BOD and TSS for influent and
effluent of each individual treatment facility is not a concern. Because of the location of the effluent
pump station at Grant Creek, flow measurement equipment has been eliminated from the treatment
train and replaced by a new installation at the combined effluent discharge. The sample could be
collected using an integral continuous sampler over a 24-hour period not proportional to the rate of
flow This data will be reported in a special report and submitted monthly with the DMR but not be an
enforceable limit of the DMR

7. The sampling location for outfall 001 "E" will be the effluent of the UV system. This location can
easily receive a signal from the flow meter instrumentation for a flow proportional composite sample.
To report accurate dissolved oxygen levels, the effluent grab sample will be measured at the bottom of
the cascade to obtain the benefit of aeration of this unit prior to discharge in the Yadkin River. The
sampling location for Grant Creek outfall 002 will be located in the end of the old chlorine contact
chamber prior to the pump wet well. The sampling location for Town Creek outfall 003 will be the last
dL channel of the old chlorine contact chamber just prior to the pump station..
If you have any questions concerning these comments or statement that need to be included in the final
permit before issuing, please call me at 704-638-5371.
Sincerely,4a&4c�c=-5�e I /VJ
Barbara Sifford
Compliance Coordinator
City of Salisbury
Enclosures
pc: John C. Vest
Matt Bernhardt
Randy Cauble
Mike Frick
Carol Hamilton

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources �,A>
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary MAY 1 1 2001
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
61,TW,A
IT ,•�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division cf GzMl'dhl'116 -_
MEMORANDUM F`i b1irl'Wate'r �uppi
�IiG , ��c�liile ieIOC " i
f
N
To: Britt Setzer ce i o
NC DENR / DEH / Regional Engineer
- CV
!Mooresville Regional Office
From: Teresa Rodriguez
NPDES Unit -
Subject: Review of Draft NPDES Permit NCO023884 -
City of Salisbury - Yadkin River Regional WWTP
Rowan County
NC DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
J
-r m
LU
MAY 1 1 2001
3
x
oa
WATER
QUALITY SEAT ION
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the draft permit and return this form by
June 8, 2001. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at the telephone number
or e-mail address listed at the bottom of this page.
RESPONSE: (Check one)
Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly, the
stated effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the designated
water quality standards.
F-1
Concurs with issuance of the above permit, provided the following conditions are met:
F-1 Opposes the issuance of the above permit, based on reasons stated below, or attached:
Signe
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5083, extension 595 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES Teresa. Rodriguez@ ncmail.net

vv
JV1J
-4
C-)
co
M
N
CD
Z r
O�
S
May 21, 2001
Ms. Teresa Rodriguez
NPDES Unit
NC- DENR- DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: NPDES Draft Permit
Permit No. NCO023884
Yadkin River Regional WWTP
Dear Ms. Rodriguez:
On May 14, 2001 the City of Salisbury received the draft NPDES permit for the Yadkin
River Regional WWTP. Public Notice No. 46522 was published in the Salisbury Post on
May 8, 2001. I called Permits and Engineering Section on May 9, 2001 to request a copy
of the draft permit. At that time I was told that the draft permit was in the mail and it was
in error that we had not received the draft before the public notice was published in the
paper.
By this letter the City of Salisbury is requesting that the comment period be extended
from June 2, to June 14, 2001 to allow the City of Salisbury, utilities staff the 30 day
comment time to review the draft permit.
Pc: J. C. Vest
Matt Bernhardt
Randy Cauble
Carol Hamilton
Mike Frick
Sincerely,
Barbara Sifford
Compliance Coordinator
6 -'' _ -- 5
vi �1 +pr
CITY OF SALISBURY
UTILITIES MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION
400 N. CHURCH ST., SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA 28144 PHONE: [phone], FAX: [phone]

2
SA"tyl-Pbst
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES
Attn: Christie Jackson
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
#46522 m o m�am3��E"o�a E�oE-r�yd=r8 Z �,r �2 E0M ��o dcceoo
O
�=% p N YO O °-U a N m m Q E N N O ° O C N>_ y C O.L p O N ro a a) C N L ro Q ZJ�ro°pro
EC
EC3o
Due:$73.26 oUWa
m N C) O -O m O N O S a) Q C O a) N O a) E O N m �= a) m U N � >..N � N Co N O a
_V o o .m o Z ro m m o Z m E t o m 1-0- - > .� 3= m o s _> d as ri o E Q d>
Z>Em.o°-' .�. C7 o°`mma=i°.`�Oo0 3 ° E°°oo aEO °'cEwroO��Zo � `E£m.o.
N m O C O� .. r6 > 'O U N O 0 0- U a) O t� .- L d_- t0 U C .-. Q,
tfi N W 01 U (n Q) N Q c7 r C L.. C OI jj in a a, C .= Q 4' .0 C 'O 'C. V m° ro L_ m t0 .a O m O O N ro
W a m -rot o 00,
0, N o -o m o o c' - w � a T 0 o .° d .o ro a a a> °,O o co f6 aa) m °
O CO m O 7 C ro=- _> a) N y S] C `c a 3 �' T d>_ E `0 0. ` d" N a ro° _rn E
Z Z NO v ° 0 2 °w E a-0 0 °aro E am s-o-o-6 c° 3 ° E at 3i5 o °o_4._ °. ° i L`c ro ° a0,
v 2rn,F- _ vaaU o
NORTH CAROLINA
ROWAN COUNTY
Before the undersigned a Notary Public of said County and State, duly commissioned, qualified, and authorized by law to
administer oaths, personally appeared WINFRED MENTION, who being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he is
ASSISTANT ADVERTISING DIRECTOR of the Salisbury Post, published, issued and entered as second class mail in the
City of Salisbury, in said County and State, that he is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement, that the
notice or other legal advertisement a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in the Salisbury Post, on the
following dates:
May 8, 2001
and that the said newspaper is which such notice, paper document or legal advertisement was published was, at the
time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597
of the General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the
General Statutes of North Carolina.
This 10th day of May, 2001
Swom and subscribed before me
This loth day of May, 2001
�ACuc I
My Commission
D LL, U v
MA`!16r
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
PO Box 4639 Salisbury, NC 28145-4639 [phone]

posed permit should make
reference to the NPDES
permit number listed be-
low.
Date: 5/4/01
David Goodrich for
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Public notice of intent to is-
sue a State NPDES permit
to the following:
NPDES Permit Number
NC0023884, Salisbury,
City, P.O. Box 479, Salis-
bury, NC 28145 has ap-
plied for a facility located
in Rowan County dis-
charging wastewater into
Yadkin River in the Yad-
kin -Pee Dee River Basin.
Currently BOD5 and NH3
are water quality limited.
This discharge may affect
future allocations in this
portion of the receiving
stream.

d
P
r t I t-Nv't-woe
AiI
D TY
City of Salisbury
Technical Services Division
1915 Grubb Ferry Road
Salisbury, N.C. 28144
September 17, 1999
Mr. David Goodrich
Permits & Engineering Supervisor
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
1621 Mail Stop Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
In order to comply with NPDES permit # NC0023884, the City monitors several effluent grab parameters,
including dissolved oxygen and fecal coliforms at the Grant's Creek WWTP. Grab samples for these
parameters are currently collected at the top of the effluent cascade shown as "Existing Sampling Point"
on the accompanying diagram. D.O. and fecal coliforms are not monitored at the bottom of the cascade
due to the force of the effluent flow. Monitoring there would likely result in damage to our D.O. probe and
breakage of coliform sampling bottles. Should we even be able to secure a sample, it is unlikely to be
representative at this location.
Ultraviolet disinfection is used at this plant. Sampling at the top of the cascade has worked well for D.O.;
however, we see numerous non -fecal background counts on our plates when samples are collected at
this location. Collection of simultaneous fecal samples at the proposed sampling location has shown that
fecal counts compare well with counts at the existing sample point. However, there are usually no
background counts from the proposed sampling location. We feel that plates without background growth
will produce more reliable fecal coliform results.
For this reason, we are requesting permission to permanently move the sampling point for fecal coliforms
to the "Proposed Sampling Location." Coliform samples would be collected at point OO or point
according to which u.v. channel is in use. We do not plan to move the D.O. monitoring point. Please let us
know when you have reached a decision on this request.
Sin erely,
11
Phil Dearm an ger
Technical Services Division
Cc: John Vest, Utilities Director
Barrett Lasater. Asst. Utilities Director
Fred Summers, Wastewater Operations Manager
Carol Hamilton, WWTP Laboratory Supervisor

Qra To Yadkin River
EfflUenj System
t G ��V
C
WO
GE Sample Pt to DG.doc

SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
City of Salisbury
is hereby authorized to:
Permit No. NC0023884
1. Continue to operate and maintain the existing 7.5 MGD wastewater treatment facility consisting of
four mechanical bar screens, four grit chambers, two pra T-e6rifiers, twe4rielfing-f#ters, aeration" 5
basin with mechanical aerators and mixers, t s da�tdarifierrs, screw pump lift station, ___�, ? o i '
chlorinationldechlorination (not in use), UV disinfection, cascade post aeration, sludge thickener,
atien, two aerobic digesters, standby powerNand instrument flow measurement
�Q� } located at the Grant Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility, 1915 Grubb Ferry Road, Spencer, Rowan VC
J County and o h Q
)ovA4� 2. Continue to operate and maintai the existing 5.0 MOD wastewater treati?enttfacility consisting of
two mechanical bar screens, two grit chambers, two aeration basins with fh c anical aerators and
mixers, two secondary clarifiers, screw pump lii talion, two aerobic digesters, standby power,
instrument flow measurement, sludge dewatering facilities and effluent pump station located at the
Town Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility, 850 Heiligtown Road, East Spencer, Rowan County, and
alAt Gt.T�T
3. Continue to operate and maintain an ultraviolet disinfection system, cascadt aerator, Parshall flume,
effluent sampling station and diffuser for the combined effluents from the Yadkin River Regional
WWTP; and' ► 1,:' ; {-d,. e -�c;k. UA - W -1 . I- �
4. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map through Outfall 001
into the Yadkin River which is classified as WS-V waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.

I
Permit No. NCO023884
A.(1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL (Continued)
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
EFFLUENTns
CHARACTERISTICS
Measurement Vrequency _ `
Sample Type
Saanple Locatio
Dissolved Oxygen
June -Set
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
pH
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
Temperature
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -Ma
1/week
Total Phosphorus
June -Set
1/month
Grab
U, D
N026
June -Set
1/month
Grab
U, D
N036
June -Set
1/month
Grab
U, D
NH3-N6
June -Set
1/month
Grab
U, D
TKN6
June -Set
1/month
Grab
U, D
NOx
June -Set
1/month
Grab
D
Chl-A
June -Set
1/month
Grab
D
Notes:
1 Sample locations: E — Combined Effluent from Grant Creek and Town Creek, U — Upstream, at least 200 feet
upstream of the discharge point, D — Downsteam, 0.7 miles above Southern Railroad Bridge.
As a participant in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Association, the instream monitoring requirements as stated
above are waived. Should your membership in the agreement be terminated, you shall notify the Division
immediately and the instream monitoring requirements specified in your permit shall be reinstated.
As per 15A NCAC 2B.0505 (c) (4), stream stream sampling may be discontinued at such time as flow conditions
in the receoiving waters or extreme weather conditions will result in a substantial risk of injury or death to
persons collecting samples. In such cases, on each day that sampling is discontinued, written justification for the
discontinuance shall be specified in the monitoring report for the month in which the event occurred. This
provision shall be strictly construed and may not be utilized to avoid the requirements of 15A NCAC 2B.0500
when performance of these requirements is attainable. When there is a discontinuance pursuant to this provision,
stream sampling shall be resumed at the first opportunity after the risk period have ceased.
2 The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/l.
3 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4 Monitoring only applies if chlorine is added to the treatment system for disinfection.
5 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 6.6 percent; March, June, September, and December. See special condition
A.(4). on the Supplement to Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements Page.
6 Parameters shall be monitored using an approved EPA method and shall provide the following quantitation
:eve Phosphorus, NO2+NO3, and NH3-N = 0.01 mg/1 lN9 i�L � nC �rn�G
• TKN = 0.1 mWl
- r
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts:`
', jkN Odd
&�`�'zrr'v3®2

NPDES/Non-Discharge Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
NPDES OR NONDISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART:
Date of Request
Facility ,-
Permit #
Region
Requestor
Pretreatment A_D Towns- Keyes McGee (ext. 580)
Contact E-L Towns- Vacant Position
M-R Towns- Dana Folley (ext. 523)
C--T-21rns- Steve Amigone (ext 592)
PRETREATMENT UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART:
Status of Pretreatment Program (circle all that apply)
1) the facility has no SIU's and does have a Division approved Pretreatment Program that isINACTIVE
2) the facility has no SIU's and does not have a Division approved Pretreatment Program
3) the facilit has (or is developing) a Pretreatment Program
a>a ul rogram with LTMP or 2b) is Modified Program with STMP
7 (P
4) iFe facility MUST develop a Pretreatment Program - Full Modified
6
5) additional conditions regarding Pretreatment attached or listed below
Flow
Permitted Actual STMP time frame:
% Industrial
Z,Z most recent
a°o Domestic
(�,y �9'next cycle
L
ollutant
T
heck List
POC due to
M
NPDES/Non-
STMP
LTMP
Discharge
Required
Required by
Frequency at
Frequency at
P
Permit Limit
by EPA*
503 Sludge-
POC due to SIU""
Site specific POC (Provide Explanation)—*
effluent
efflu nt
OD
4
M
SS
4
101M
H3
4
Q M
rsenic
4
101M
Cadmium
4
JQJM
Chromium
4
1 Q M
Copper
4
Q M
Cyanide
4
Q M
Lead
4
Q M
Mercury
4
Q M
Molybdemum
4
Q M
Nickel
4
Q M
Silver
4
Q M
Selenium
4
Q Im
Zinc
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
Always in the LTMP
"Only in the LTMP if the POTW land applies sludge
Only in LTMP while the SIU is connected to the POTW
Only in LTMP when the pollutant is a specific concern to the POTW (ie-Chloride to a POTW who accepts Textile waste)
Q= Quarterly
M=Monthly
Comments:
/� �/ 3 tr�Al /! i / vw,✓ f c t Ts csy
a
I- "'A
NPD ES_PI RFform.000804
Revised: August 4, 2000
01
2000

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NCO023884
Facility Information
Facility Name:
Grants Creek and
Town Creek WWTP
Permitted Flow:
12.5 MGD
County:,
Rowan
Facility Class:
IV
Regional Office:
Mooresville
Facility/Permit Status:
(i.e. New, Modification,
Existing or Renewal
Existing
USGS Topo Quad:
E17NW
Stream Characteristics j
Receiving Stream:
Yadkin River
Stream Classification:
WS-V
Winter 7Q10 cfs :
N/A
Subbasin:
03-07-04
30Q2 cfs :
N/A
Drains a Area .mil :
3,377
Average Flow (cfs):
4,879
Summer 7Q10 cfs
263.5
IWC %):
6.85
Changes Incorporated into Permit Renewal
Pro osed Changes.
Parameters Affected
Basis for change(s)
Effluent Limitations and
Revised effluent monitoring
Monitoring frequency revised
Monitoring Requirements
for TN and TP from monthly
as per memo prepared by
Page
to weekly.
Steve Pellei dated 12-07-98.
Effluent Limitations and
Revised effluent toxicity limit
Limits revised because facility
Monitoring Requirements
from 67% to 6.6 % for the
now discharges into the
Page
12.5 MGD limit page and
Yadkin River.
10.5 % for the 20 MGD limit
page.
Effluent Limitations and
Deleted limits for Lead,
RPA indicates that limits for
Monitoring Requirements
Mercury, Chromium and
these parameters are not
Page
Fluoride.
longer required.
Effluent Limitations and
Deleted monitoring
Monitoring for this parameter
Monitoring Requirements
requirement for Aluminum
is not required.
Page
Effluent Limitations and
Deleted Special Conditions H,
Conditions are no longer
Monitoring Requirements
I, J, K, L, and M,
required.
Page

h
DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0023884
(Continued)
Summary
The facility has requested the combination of the Grants Creek permit NC0023884 and
the Town Creek permit NC23892. Both wastewater treatment plants discharge under a
common effluent line to the Yadkin River. They have also requested that the facility is
designated as Yadkin River Regional WWTP.
The following notes were taken during the review of the application package:
➢ Review of Basin Plan:
The Yadkin River at NC 150 near Spencer is reported as support threatened by non -
point pollution. The control of sediments from both urban and rural is necessary.
➢ 303(d) List Review
Reported problem parameter is sediment.
➢ Reasonable Potential Analysis:
A reasonable potential analysis was performed using the most recent DMR data. The
results of the analysis are attached to this document. In summary,
Cadmium The maximum predicted concentration was determined to be less
than the allowable concentration. Therefore, no limit will be included in the
renewal
Cyanide The maximum predicted concentration was determined to be less
than the allowable concentration. Therefore, no limit will be included in the
renewal.
Lead The maximum predicted concentration was determined to be less than
the allowable concentration. Therefore, no limit will be included in the
renewal.
Nickel The maximum predicted concentration was determined to be less
than the allowable concentration. Therefore, no limit will be included in the
renewal.
DENR/DWQ

FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NCO023884
(Continued)
- Chromium The maximum predicted concentration was determined to be less
than the allowable concentration. Therefore, no limit will be included in the
renewal.
- Copper Monitoring only for copper will remain in the permit. This
parameter has an action level of 7 µg/1.
- Silver Monitoring only for silver will remain in the permit. This parameter
has an action level of 0.06 µg/l.
- Mercury The maximum predicted concentration was determined to be less
than the allowable concentration. Therefore, no limit will be included in the
renewal.
- Zinc Monitoring only for zinc will remain in the permit. This parameter has
an action level of 50 µg/l.
Facility failed toxicity tests in September 1998 and June, July, August, September,
and December 1997.
The facility joined the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Association, in June of 1998.
Therefore, the established instream monitoring requirements will be waived until the
facility chooses to end its membership with the association.
• WLA Review:
The most recent WLA was prepared in January 15, 1996. Limits were determined to
be water quality limited and instream monitoring was
recommended for DO, Fecal Coliform, Temperature, Conductivity and turbidity, TP,
PO4, TKN, NH3N, Nox, and chl-A. In addition, the following metals monitoring
requirements were recommended: Cyanide daily max limit of 292 µg/l; Mercury
daily maximum limit of 0.65 µg/l, Cadmium, Nickle, Copper, Zinc, Lead, Silver,
Tetrachloroethylene, and Toluene monitoring.
➢ Staff Report Review
Most recent staff report was prepared in September of 1998. Staff report indicates
that a new outfall has been constructed with discharge into the Yadkin River. In
addition UV disinfection and an effluent diffuser have been added to the existing
facility. Staff report states the permit renewal should note the addition of the new
outfall line and the Yadkin River as the new discharge location. This outfall
relocation is part of a master plan that will ultimately end with the construction of
DENR/DWQ

FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0023884
(Continued)
a new WWTP facility and the elimination of the City's Grant Creek and Town
Creek WWTPs.
Region recommends that the permit be renewed as requested.
It is recommended that the permit be renewed as drafted.
Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance
Draft Permit to Public Notice: 3/14/2001
Permit Scheduled to Issue: 4/27/2001
State Contact
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit,
please contact Teresa Rodriguez at [phone], extension 595.
NPDES Recommendation by:
Regional Office Comments
5 CG �C'� r-e,��
Date:
Regional Recommendation by:
Reviewed By:
Regional Supervisor: !�(L� I�Z, Date:' 7 U�
NPDES Unit:
Date:

I]

Headworks - Plant Metals
i
i
Month & Year-
1 ,
Contract Metals
ample & Date
Al
Ag
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
Cu
Mn
Zn
Hg
As
Se
Sb
Mo
;'R 3 / GG
2,*1
<;001
•003
�0
,Ol I
.014
, So
I.V
'�o,zo
. OL
l00
, 009
3
iI. E
tool
4,00)
4•01
4.01
4,00.5
4•10
<,10
<,io
<U,
,r)D<
�! 00
Z.oUS
R C�
288
�. n!
.13
<.o l
, oo7
<. l0
,2z8
,172
,20
�ODS�
-� 0��
. Q(fl
, 03 j
PhD
pp
<.00!
1,031'"1
,00'7
<,!D
4:�9
<,/0
Q, vi
,
�.OD
� OL
.0/�-
•dam (
.E�1,0-
/,tool
.�•a01
<,O)
,�,dl
,�,�5
�.I0
���
<.10
-<o,'zv
•oo�
�c��
too^
; oig,
FBI * 3/1c� o°
i>
s
�008
.�I
. a0
, ►
a., I
13
, 0/7
.a9
IDE* 311�, oo
,:
Oa5
1,(�
, 59
-,29
-�
:03
,659
31
,8
, 03
1037
17
03
- OiCp
0
, d3
a
, oo�-
, O/
, d I
toll
Mz* '��ib 6a
`°a
•oa3
.��5
.19
:03
1► I
I��n
,00a��
,old
ICE* /ra o�
M i i
c�33
00
��
(��3
t
.£.oz
.
,
AQ S5e4 Se iLWa4
��
�J`�
.�5
rtshs�oneS c
�ODz
ebb
�oaa
. b
, 01�
°�
I��
002—
ILA MD ;,�
<<00z,
ool�
,055
�1 �
. o�f5
, 0
J,(o
, DO
Day Composites consisting of daily grabs
Ietals on Basins and Digestors are also contracted out.
C�O�1pd���D
Page 1

I,
HEADWORKS
- Plant Samples - Contract Analysis
Headworks- Plants
Month & Year -
Sample & Date
N + N ,
Phenols**
Toluene**
TTCE**
MTBE**
Contract Lab
Comments
j
q
Y
070FE
3r
;I is Influent without Residuals
Grab
1'•
±. 1
Page 2

' 1
A-i
a �
a. .. 'ti�{nei �, .♦Jai t

Imm M. m � m
.1"Mmmmm
mmmmmm

HEADWORKS -INDUSTRIAL METALS
I
I
I
Month &.Year- March 2000
1 lContract Metals
�Sample & Date
4w `RIIQ_
'2%
4�?'�-�, ski`
t :a,. .uc.��;
ad:.. y �'
�du ����i®
c�Gl"�'e 1°��'t�G1YY'w"�c�'i�F�
c�x.•,y�'�..nnJ
®5es�j
.t:
a _ ,_ '.
5
R.OVEHRO, C11111",

HEADWORKS -INDUSTRIAL METALS
Month & Year- March 2000
Contract Metals
'Sample & Date
E
��t���������
�:�.�;�
is
�
�
.. _ . _ _ .
w
4�--�®mom.
_
_
(�OG�I?ll�{ II Ir17° cw

U
HEADWORKS - Plant Samples
TI is Influent without Residuals
*4 Day Composite consisting of daily grabs
Headworks- Plants
Month & Year- A of 1 I
Grab is = total solids-
,1
Page 1
POiMi gOUiiCE � -

ui=AMIAInPW-q _ Pl AMT IVI T,ALS
Headworks - Plant Metals s-
Month & Year -
Contract Metals
Sample & Date
Al
Ag
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
Cu
Mn
Zn
Hg
As
Se
Sb
Mo
GR �t ��C�
00 ,
C .CI
<.Ol
-<.01
' 003
G, l0 •
4i
<,10
�(1,Z6
,pD i
�. UU
. N0
3g
GE �9
•GI
<.ppj
`.l J
�•01
C',p
<, oar
e.lo
�.10.
- .)p
-<Qi26
lDo�
��0 Od.40F
.03
TR
��50
00
GGbI
<.DI
.Ol
'007
� u
°3(7�0
-226
0,2.
< Ou-
<":UO 1
� 0/5'
. 03�J
TI
1,Z'
e,001
<c,00►
4.01
<, 01
<-oaS
<.10
122)
<, ID ,
-<O-Z-o
vo
,vo
<.Dos-
v �
TE �
<
4,001
4,'001
<. of
.<.p
COS'
G10
4.10
GBM*
00/3
, 3 ©
/D
D5 l
09)�O
,
,
,
GDE*
r: �:.
..
• von
• $�
, �/
,oq�
a, o
y
o�
v �
/
S
TM1"
a�
c
�trr�.
D�� 7
• D�q
• ,�. Q
, � �
/- �-
�, D
. o 0�8
• D /3
TM2*
02?8
107
1,3
�•U
.DOaS�
,0/�
.D/j�
.U�d1
06(0
•al
5(�
0 9�
3, �-
,0/sa
. d.� S
.t)3
Dd�l
,
"4 Day Composites consisting of daily grabs
Metals on Basins and Digestors are also contracted out.

Headworks- Plants
HEADWORKS Plant Samples - Contract Analysis Month & Year- 0 D
Sample & pate -
S**
Phenol
Contract Lab
Lei. Aar
iG E
TI is Influent without Residuals
** Grab
Page 2
OMWEVE
C14-

.0
HEADWORKS -INDUSTRIAL SAMPLES
Month & Year- April 2000
lContract
Sample & Date
BOD
TSS
TDS
COD
TKN
NH3N-
Phos
Chloride
Fluoride
CN-
Sulfate WN
HBD q_q.8.
i
t 3
3zo
[,.-73
0
f.Of
4.01
op
GEN
GEN
GEN
GEN 41-7
------
D1
NOR
r7,
RWB 12
37 7
0 3?
39,
39,
0
THR
16 7'
591
5''�5
0, Z3
3
0, k2-
4.01
0
PFX
5'7-3
5-7.
0,2`7
-D
0,!;-
o
PRC
�5-1
613
it.
0.33
GRQ
zo
/�S
�6q
275'
333
<,01
RKW \.51
9 �
3 So
390
15,1
5-
DOM#2
DOM#3 152
-79
DLO
3a9
7-6
94,- If
3Y,9
OL, 6 2.
DOM#4
1 Zc)
13,0
:3 0
7-
6.0
L
0 m LL Z_ 0,C-F.A Ce:- 4 0 6L 0 k- c ovc-2 e D Coj,Z) "Or FE;
(V:P_

HEA®W®RKS -INDUSTRIAL METALS
Sample & Date Al Ag Cd Cr I Pb Ni Cu Fmn
HBD
GEN
GENU
i 4'�17F4k pI j
4..
NNN
tGE
NOR/
I
RWB �6
THR 4l3
PFX�/3
PRC
GRQ
RKW 6
DOM##'i 27
DOM#2
DOM#3 L
DOM##4 4/7!7'
i
Month & Year- April'2000
Contract Metals P&C—e—
Zn Hg As Se Be Sb Mo
.0c) �.0ob .007V
,UO� <<Uv L,oDS
<O,LO
tQb
1,Oas
�,��
• l3
rblv
<jb>
,00a%
.0/7
,02�
-"o, 2
1, v
160
vo
0.2-1
C,Oe
4A
r
<,0
D� t
<a, w
�• v�
�, D o
<. o v �;
Z. Qo
!d,z '
Des
,vo
, pt)S
�vo�
Ol2- D
14. 0 b '5
-ii0DS',/"00
ol:zokuo
,.
Cog--
s

Monthly Industrial Metals
Date analyzed
•�/„/o0 5�,/�
;�21oo
S" 17100
S'/� fXJ 617loo
gvo0
5110—
Analyst
y
99
Industry Date
Ib
Ni
Ag
Cr
Cd
Cu
Zn
Mn
AI
r O12
. 0% i
<, Do/
<. 0 /
/0
: 0.7 -
4. of
<.0i
�.��
�,���•1.
{/
�!U
416
<.O1
'02
<.0i
-{.W%
1.10
l�
4/-/
4, 0)
• 021
<. 0/
4.00
" 16
I-fQ�
4 /}
, 0)
,0/0
ON
4 00/
NO JZ
414
-< - 0 J
<. OO
<, 00/
-<. 0 /
4,001
<,01
<.oz,
ocl
<01
<.0&i
410 1,104
3e,
0 j
4. 005
00l
, 04,7
<. 00i
/. i0
• / G)-5_
i h
4 /
<. o i
-<. c(a5'
{. 60 i
r. 10
</
PRC
i3
,ory�
�0�
�,00/
{,f�
��001
.45
.22.7
<1
PFX 14113
4.o+
, ooe,
oo
<.00i
<.10
.1110-3
0
'fY}
z7
<.t� i
<:oo r
�.oG i
{:pi
-G.00 i
�,10
, 073
<. 10
J,43
}
•
0
i F3
.
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
1
I
I
I I
i
i

s
Headworks- Plants
EADWORKS - Rlant Samples
Month & Year- S11— A o t7 p
Sample & Date
BOD
TSS
FI-
COD
TKN
NH3N-
Phos
CI-
Sulfate
CN= *
7-(.100
Z3 e
6,00
S- k-E7
31,1
z 3, �
( 15
9 Vq
�
<,oI
z b
.q
0-71
q 1
5: 6
<.o l
q z-t 0
3. 6
5, o
I f 0
/.
27, 2
Y3
<. 0 1
Z(-O o
!
2
O,`l l
�((�
2.6-3
y 3
CO,
� j. 7
<.01
ZS7
22,'r
�?b
�.
3�?.�
<,01
4?00
(Q
74,Y
X YP- 3
<0
Influent without Residuals GE1 is at the old chlorine contact chamber
a Composite consisting of daily grabs ** Y P 9 Y 9 Grab is = to al olds
2001
MAR 2 0 _,.
Page 1
CF.NR - WATER OUALIT4
POINT SOURCE BRANCH

i.
Headworks- Plants
HEADWORKS =Plant Samples a Contract Analysis
Month & Year- �� o� ID C CD
Sample,& Date
N ¢ N Phenols**
Toluene**
TTCE**
MTBE**
Contract Lab
c9Lents
aR 9 a a
4r7'
o+N
YIDEp OA�.T� A�,
5 . Z u iQ3E
Vl�qZa D
j�a D
<
1
7 uSE`I
."%u IQ. I `f-�;chld�obenaenf
TR
TI -` o� 6 O
5. (a Q
i
51(t" 1O_fC;drm 1. + ! 6 Jilor eAe
TE I
r
I q -Die.WoYDbenz-e fiet•�l u I
TI is Influent without Residuals Gel is at the old chlorine conr=tact chamber
** Grab
Page 2 ` UlL)IiLI��L'�L� U �D

S
Headworks - Plant Metals
Month & Year- 0 D O
Contract Metals
;ample & Date
Al
Ag
Cd
CrPb
Ni
CU
Mn
Zn
Se
Sb
MOo
3R
I.17-
.7<,Cdd
OCq
,010
o
4,1
'0
.tOct
oaJ
1,005Do
r G�
;E 27
<001
<-00)
<,01
<:c�5
<�10
<. IO
,
'Hg`
,As
oo.l.0
, av
d
R
<.00 i
<.po)
, o
<.ODS
<,10
034
,137
0,
/,OO
"OD
< 00
"03
rl 9�2G
1,51
{•oo)
<.o�)
c.00'2
<.005
<,10
-.,ait6
.071
0.31
- , 0
i 0D,5'
<,O 6
-,O-+
rE `��2,7
<I.o
<.00f 41001
),OC4
_�C,DIo
.01?
<.to
�.It?
,2o1
-<o,�
�,vo5.vo
<,Onz
o
3BM*
�� �U6
�`la
.aoS
,o��,a
,�3Z
1,
3DE"
ar7� ;A�"'
5
!,5'�
,3o
Q,3o
•d�5
./9a
,
,l
rm'*
00
�'' k 00
rM2*
l
, �/
/ v3
%a30
,/5'0
1 Z
D/
, D/
•d5Z
rDE*
�:.�,
�G
. 1a
70�0
<D, Z
.�y
, 060
&E z7
e,001
,a)6
<.010
4,10
14. io
JZ3
<o17—
14 Day Composites consisting of daily grabs
Wetals on Basins and Digestors are also contracted out.
Page 1 o �� i LW
l V) 11 LI D

i �� � t•'
.� _ ... .s i_ .
i;'I ? ;.

=Se

,Monthly Inclustrial Metals
0
Date analyzed
�/z9�oo ;
3 oD !0
z/Do
J0/3�00
10�4 �
io/4 °0
14"4/00 l'/4
0°
��/�{/0 D }
Analyst
F2gA—g—
`
Industry I Date
Pb
Ni
Cr
Cd
Cu
Zn
Mn
Al
N/T
?1200
,0j2
<.',00i
.I s
<.0c)
176
,pr"¢
.027
l.`4
RIT
9/3100
, 053
, 214
f{/T
g/j�/ ov
,c3G
,222
11/7-
�11S/oo
, 02 W
" 33
NSC
4I2100
<.oi
.031
.002
017
<,00 1
,10
5.4-1
<1,D
NSG
913Ia
<.01
. 1
/21
N5C
s/o
<,o 1
'v/p
9112,10D
,012
. ao�
',001
<.002.
<.o
<.lo
, o9/
, 030
<I.0
0 R
'1310
, 023
<. 0o5
<,00
<. oo-
<. oo I
<. H)
W.DR
914Ao
<.oi
<,oa5
<.00/
<o0z
<, o I
<.
W,P&
051700
.0110
.006
tool
•003
tool
<.lo
<,0Y
/
'7E
V7100
<,01
, 020
<.001
! 2
4- 001
<, 10
, 342
, o3 6
oom
9�7 oG
`,o1
<.CO.J
<.00J
<.c702
�'001
<.10
-,O
.027
�'!l
D)M 2
97/oa
<,ol
.00-7
<.001
.<.002
<.00'
<.lo
1/0
.02
<I.0
CH6-
021()
,G12
i
"tool
<,o0 I
<.10
./So
,o&2-
2,36
,L,O
'?/j d0
, 022
,00,
<. 001
1,004
<. 001
<, 1
•313
, o fo
3, 61S'
PC
g1Zi oo
<.ol
,o; I
<.001
.,)0
<•ool
•187*
,IS2
,o37
-1:34
FTZ
S 29co
<.01
.057
:col
.01/
-4,001
<,l
.o85
,3/5
<1.0
PCA
9 7 ee
,Q1
,o2l
<.001
,003
<.00!
<,Io
.ono
,o;o
<1,0

E
+ Headworks- Plants p
4EADWORKS -Plant Samples Month & Year-
Oct-oo
Sample & Date
BOD
TSS
COD
TKN
NH3N-
Phos
Cl-
Sulfate
CN **
IR
'0/(7
Y
206
79
3,�-,Z
• 23.2.
1 q0
/'--3(
C-9,3n
-<.p)
!E
10112
,Z.2
J` J
2�
5,�
0141
-7Z.Z.
S /
/.dl
;E1
Jolla
33
0.1 (
1• �a--
�(,, �
� 3 1
<,01
R
4olt y
Z.� ,
S4 R
3.2
1
10 1-7
lL( 9
20
y3S
3i,1
210
1• 02--
S -7
,S
Z.o{
E
lot
5, 5
g, ,
z�
�;�
O, to
1 9
Sz. 4
�i3, 0
;BM*
r 1c- to
is (.2
!DE*
is 2. z
M1*
is CL33
M2*
is 0,3o
'DE*
/
is 2. z S
I is Influent without Residuals GE1 is at the old chlorine contact chamber
t Day Composite consisting of daily grabs ** Grab is = total solids
Page 1 MAR 2 2��� r� � TUj EVE--,
i
� � �1I
,I nr.�o �a�rra n11aI ITY 1

Headworks - Plant Metals
Month & Year- Oct-00
-
Contract
Sample & Date
GEII
/ ,
������ '17�t,� � 36 s •�•AII �,.
' ,
��
• I
�.PTSs"
��16'C�.....!
`
•
4 JAR '*4�
•
,'!'lYb��",��j
•J
�'���yv1�
�,�^�'.�
5 Y Nn-vY *�. •'�.".t
7
�.k �.
*4 Day Composites consisting of daily grabs
Metals on Basins and Digestors are also contracted out to Hydro Analytical.
Page 1

Headworks- Plants
9EADWORKS'-,Plant Samples - Contract Analysis
Month & Year-
S
Oct-oo
Sample & Date
-R 7
N ¢ N Phenols**
(65,
Toluene**
-�'
TTCE**
9
MTBE**
Contract Lab
HydroAnalytical
Comments
�E (,a g
,�, ��
G
L
HydroAnalytical
3El (:o/1.2
�,
�'
%
-�--
HydroAnalytical
.R ( o 3
, (�
,� 1
�� 3
HydroAnalytical
,
H droAnalytical
iE j.�
��6
NOV
J�
HydroAnalytical
TI is Influent without Residuals
** Grab
Gel is at the old chlorine conr=tact chamber
Page frJG)1
�ri��sl7�{u

6-
Month & Year- Oct-00
:Sample & Date
®�
io
®}'..'
Nr'_..•*}. {N1
Sm
!Y '+. r
;1
'
•.^}' i
r� •
+r �c.
J Mi�=•t ���
.; 7d ����Lc:
{
p
k!
, ,��'�.F
���'cy
a�"`�'�7�r
S`s�t
�ll�`���'
i
s:',?
i-,' '�r�
9 ^TviVT}N'
.a
, ry
t
Y `. '*,!'
� GY '4v tnprtF.�yi�r. 'Ii�
Yid'^'
eT1
'� �.;w,�,c'�� =;'�a.�
�+
�
.,s1r(
'4'" s"R,
i��
i^^v^^^Sw.--• 1
-.aNY
�z�'.�`s.�
3ov ;'ff".
pr�prvv•p-�+�twQ ��� +
<`�V�
-G65k� 1.,,.iS�.�,1r,
K. xswnrn-=::i�
F`'?'..F• vg
:w .,u� •; .z,.1
T. p�MtC+.� µ� 1`
FuF >'��`y�
t � Nd' � W31��
����,�.:� �
ailxi.3.
dN
..MCA ! vn a
� _ _ Z �N fi"-.�-�.;.';2
� ,_ �. �* � �_:1
«"."..— xsir�..sti..,
�7A��1. � M.,.�
� �" 'vex .
�'A� � `. �®
d��yv��j}MyQ'i.�.�i%.A
iF' S'JS9.i4SC�INAtiyi—''1
�/q��
;y. *' �
.
i'•'*"t ! .,.. }
s4�` r t '+ S�
�,yL t � ;. �, h t
RF1 Sf1F sx 'x, 8 rt
f '.RdP 4 1S? t
e
.`*t A
�' of
L
y. �+r � r � t-v `•
.�' �4 t; i
¢ � 4.1
[ �. 1 — :.
Jj,.r f t iji'
•
,GR•
•
•
®���
I

HEADWORKS -INDUSTRIAL METALS Month &!Year- Oct 2000
iSample & Date =i
AG
d� u
u`y hey{
`I TJ+'yGM1.c Y�I,p,
+ ",:..�
FM
s h 1H
ME A
Yi.
�' L .a'4r
S
M1IGEN
►�
-
'-�-:-:�
IND Ol
�;Gjoi��"u�s�l �S

Monthly Industrial Metals
Date analyzed
10129/os
103 yoo
1V%O
r%j �L
vy.
�0 v0
1��? x
�o/z�/oo
1%7/00
i�?1w
0
��-
Analyst
L
vt
Industry I Date
Ni
A
Vcr
Cd
Cu
vZn
Mn
Al
GQJ
i o/!o
<.p i
. e / /
<.001
a
Jo%11.0)2
< 00
<.o oL
coa l
J 0
&E:Iv
Io1Iz
4,01
.0/4
<,001
<.00z
<.00(
1
C-0i
10113
<.O/
, 014 1
<, oo
<. oo2
<. oo I
<. 05
CT1"cuZ
to/io
. 02
<, b,
-4 100 i
, o ;
".001
<• J 0
: OT7
<.1 o
1.41
1.01
< Cos
4,00!
<: 001
4.10
4.10
< I
iYGP,
10`2
,01
<,005'
<-001
C)0
<,001
/1)0
,o63
<. Jo
<�
c93
-R(V.S
10/13
.0 2
.bff
. oo!
.01 c,
<,a0i
,22
.'F67
.222
23.F2
T//p
1°/1/
.1.0,
< 00-5
<,00/
<-002
4,001
.4.1D
,Q&'7
<.10
<
< 005
<,00/
<,oc _
�-Ool
4.10
1 'os,�
X. 10
<
/xjM'3
/o io
�,�9
�Gb�
<,Go
4.001
s,10
, 0/79
<.lp
6.73
Doin4
1�/0
�.oi
<.CO
<.001
.004
{•00J
<1

INDUSTRIAL McDNITC)RING / AN:•t-7JIJ K"��:rt►
by
•
•�arncle 1. D. f
Cz:)(le.':ed
__1l
tiame cf discnarer :
Pt91 e f/e, 4lYfis
A4---
no
Urscne�Uled'� Scne-ZUled —
perranC___ Samcle iced
: ye_ —
—••pe of monitonnc :
_—
' 6am3iino interval :
-
�� �- 40 mrn / 2< h-� ctner :
SO min ! /
nc ✓ =s :.Yard+
vc:U-ne rafle: fled
date
,5-�e Seii; sarcle
yes—
+,
s ;%F7
END 7-j-b
f
cRAS 19 7 av I ib
tf�i L>B 1 -%� I /%� s° ( SamDies preserved by
I preserve l4 cl date I Pe uit I Cate I Ar.aiv:
Parameter I voiume I D I - I j;Ott,
I
G2b off
Grab 7emoerr=re
----w I I
I ,Ornocsite O: �'• I I I
BOD ��afttQ I (I41113100I
I TSS { RefriC. { I l l I 17- 7- 0)
i DS
COD {�sa�otuz i !rI 13 s
{ T KNs� I r� 13 0.
0& G
Cr`t- I INA02t>;�l = I ✓I I <.01
I
{ I I S ' L 4 00
I i C=ILOP.ID� i��
N} 3N- I {l, S^.4 �rcz I I j 24 I ^ 28 aD
I FLUORIDE I IN/A
1 PuosP.'HORUS I
PL� ;EINOL (
M -cCUr�" I IuNC3 << I I �O,LU
M i AI I ' 'NCo Z Do <2
' L UMINUM y
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
I COF=-=R
I -AD
i NIC'rC=_
ZINC i
SiLV=-R
Deadline:
Comolete: 9- 7-n
-DoK'i

INDUSTRIAL RIAL IIIUNITUNINU / ANAL r ,::)I--) M-: v♦
Additional Samples
;ampies preserved and analyzed in addition to first page
Samples preserved by
Parameter I volume I
preserve 14 cl date I Result I Date
Analyst I comments
SULFA1 cc
INIA
� {I
MICROTOX fN/A I I
NITRATE--:- NITRITE H2SO4 off<2Coc.f%t`-
:ONTRACT METALS: IHNO3 pH<2
I f
ANTIMONY
I 163
�
4//i6�
f I
f �,
0//-
ARSENIC
I
f
i�
I�. DL
I C �v�
/ i aU i h�St� I
/ 5rl
f-� L-
BERYLLIUM
MOLYBDENUM
SELENIUM
•I
I
I I
f
Ii
I
f I
I I I
I
I I
I I I i I
I I
I
I I I i I
I
I I I I
f
INDUSTRY & DATE—

Monthly Industrial Metals
Date analyzed
q/z9/00
! , 3 0o
o z
t�pp
�0�3/00
^�4
/4 t� 00
19/.}���
/4 °J
t%{/oo
Analyst
`
Industry
Date
Pb
Ni
Ag
Cr
Cd
Cu
Zn
Mn
Al
N/T
9 / oo
.o32
,ego
< 00
.' S
<.001
D,1=76,0s-4
.o27
*i.`4
PIT
9/3100
, 053
f{ /T
9�g� 0
,G3[o
, 222
02,
, 233
/
NSC
gY2,/0
<.oi
.p31
.00z
17
<,0'0
<.10
5.f1
<I,o
/VSG
91310
<.01
1 `f?
A/S G
1 00
<. 01
/
/�
.121
N5C
��s�o
<,01
,14-3
lNo R9
oo
,o1z
.Qua
t.vv/
<.00z
<. 00 1
10
, 09/
10 0
{!.o
R
q�3�oo
.023
<. o05
<,G0
<.00;,
<,0() 1
<. 10
.064
W,DR
9 /4/o0
<.01
<,005
<.001
<ooz
<, 0 1
<.
W,PR
9 /s oo
.01 !o
, 000
<, 001
.003
<. 0o i
<.10
<, 0�
91700
<.01
020
<.00l
2
Z-001
<.10
.342
.o3(,
<I,o
t
?�7 00
<_0I
<00S
<,001
<.002
<,001
<- 10
-027
3,7/
00Ir, 2
9�7 00
<.o l
. oo
<.00 i
4.002
<. 00 '
<. 10
, /o
. 02
< 1. 0
CHG
q0;10v
.012
-�,001
3
<,00 I
<- 10
./So
,0?,2
12.34
a0
, o22
,00-7
<. 001
, o
<oo 1
<. 1
•3/3
, ofo
3. &S
PC
9129 oo
<.ol
.01 /
<.001
.00
<.001
,187
,1S2
, 037
`t: 34
FT)e
9 290o
<. 0 I
:,:O-S -7
< 001
10I /
00 I
<,
.0 85
•31S
< 1.v
PCf}
9 7 oe
,01
,021
cool
.003
4.001
<. 10
.oSO
,o:o
<I.J

} INDUSTRIAL MON1TOraING p,NA1-7JI5 K-'VKI
I U Calle=ed by
: C�}-s�•le w o-oLo: anon : �� 7�k� - R�a?X�,�•�� � -
tiame of dis=.�ar,-er Q
od J ScneduIet— Demand . Samale icsd : yes— no_
--•ape of monitoring : U�=n�ul---
50 min / 2 1 ti'
✓ dD min / 2� h _ ctne
Samviin_ irit- —
Le�:.;,ated ve'.ume cclle7 ed
date bme Soli; sammle yes— nO
s T Ai: -—
END 19 e, I /a 1 s
GRAB IJ7-�, �/6 3�s
IN LA5 IJ-7 / a» I Samples preserved by Ind
?ammeter I volume I preserve � 14 e, date
Result I Date I Anaivs, I comments
7 1 I I
Grab off
Gab Temp-- I I
Comacsrte off
7, I
Boo (R�,a I 13 J5 i 9//3/.n I
I SS IRefric. 1 �1 112 14��-tea I
DS I IRairia. I I I . i
Coy 9-11 I �i
►RCNS�I
- o- & G I IHCt- vh<2
Cry- I iNAC)H-12ra�r I vim I �,Oj
I LOP.IDc I lt�IlA I ✓I� I `l , b � ��ziloo i
NH3N- i { H2SC; 4 ni-i<L I 1 2 0• o I et 1 2 a`i o o I R
I FLUORIDE I IN/A
PHOSPHORUS I i�-273C-40H<2
PHENOL I it 2s�r�� I I I I I
MEiCURY I {HNC3 off<2 I I-�'d�Zo I `I / v1 /
MC ll AL c: I IHNG3 o"<2 I I I I I I
ALUMINUM
I CADMIUM I ( V I I
C; ,,ROMIUM
COpD_=
I NICx=
I ZINC Vf
MANGAN_ -
SiLV==c
I
Deadline: Complete:

r
INUUS 1 MUAL. MUNI 1 Vtv+dv 1 • _.-- - - _
Additional Samples
I
Samples preserved and analyzed in addition to first page
Samples preserved by
Parameter volume 1
SULFATE s
MICRO T OX IN/A
NITRATE -.L- NITRITE I I1-12SO4
preserve 14ci
NIA-�-
I 1
off<2 i
date Result 1
1
Date I Analyst comments
co
CONTRACT METALS: IHNO3
ANTIMONY 1
pH<2 I
I
I I
I
1
1
I 0/019
.- ,I
S-P 1
i
I �, ds
11
S 1
�ML
I ARSENIC
1
1
1
1 I
BERYLUUM
I
1
�, D O Sr 191"1
�� D
ho I
q 1 blil
M 5,P
/►'l s
1 L
1�. L
MOLYBDENUM
SELENIUM
II
I
I
I
II
I
I
1
1 1 I
INDUSTRY & D^Tc
Do /14�z
g1-1�0-0
PtM,

Monthly Industrial Metals
Date analyzed
i/z9 oo
I ,3 p0
!v z/pp
10131000/4
l�/4 00
Icj�4/vo
►4 4 ov
t%{/oo
Analyst
Industry Date
Pb
Ni
v Ag
Cr
Cd
Cu
Zn
Mn
Al
N/T
71121100
,032
, 020
<,00I
. i 5
<.00)
,176
,v'4
.027
`i.'4
,IT
9/i3/0
.05-3
1214
ff IT
9/i��oo
,c3�
��
,222
H/T
�11s10
, 02�
/�
,2-33
NSC
02�100
<. 01
,p31
,oat
17
<,00
<.10
5. ¢ 1
< 1, 0
fvsC
9131a
<.v1
AfSG
4//f�o
<.ot
, / 24
N5C
`lf— I
wb
9 1 co
, 012
.0o g
<.00 I
<. 00 2
<.
< ,10
, eq /
. 030
DR
`i031oo
.023
<.0c)5
<, co
<.oOZ
4,00 1
WDR
`I14100
<.oi
<.005
<.00/
<.002
<,o I
<.
AD
,olio
,00(:�
tool
,003
tool
<./o
<.o5-
�7
17/7oa
<.vi
,O o
<.001
2
14.IJa1
1,342
,036
0
�YI7 '
q/7 00
<.o i
< DO,5
<. 001
<. w2
< • 001
<.10
. 02 7
13,71
<.lo
.34
CHG
4/i21bo
,oa
1
<.00i
3
<,00 I
LQS
41'do
,022
.007
<.001
oO4
{.001
-<, 10
ofo
3.GS
PC A
1 -1/29 oo
<.01
.01 /
<. oo l
1,004
1-001
•187
, /S2
I,o37
`f 34
FT)�
E 290o
<01
,057
-< 001
,0 f
-<,001
<•, /p
offs
11-315
<I.v
021
<.001
.003
4.001
<, ► 0
. 0-5-0
, o?o
< 1,0
I

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary March 20, 2001
FACILITY REQUIREMENT
YEAR JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Rose Hill WWTP Penn chr lim: 90%
1997 Pass
--
-
Pass
---
--
Fail,Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
--
--
NCO056863/001 Beginl9/l/1996 Frequency: Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct
NonComp:Single
1998 Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
--
--
County: Duplin Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPF22
1999 Late
35
61
61
Late
35
35
Late
82
82
Pass,61
Pass,Passt
PF: 0.45 spacial SOC:9/24/99.12/31/2000P-2chrmonit(100,90,75,60,45)MJSD
200o 52
94.86
82.2
>100
82.2
>100
94.87
>100
>100
--
--
�45
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%):100 Order:
2001 >100
Roseboro WWTP Penn chr lim: 52%,
1997 ---
Pass
-
--
Pass
---
--
Pass
--
-
Pass
--
NCO026816/001 Begin:8/1/1996 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov
NonComp:Single
1998 ---
Pass
-
--
Pass
---
---
Pass
•-
--
Pass
--
County: Sampson Region: FRO Subbascm: CPF19
1999 ---
Pass
--
--
Pass
-
-
Pass
--
--
Pass
--
PF: 0.7 Special
2000 ._
Pass
---
--
Pass
---
--
Pass
--
---
Pass
---
7QIO: 1.0 IWC( .J:52 Order'.
2001
Roxboro WWTP W WTP Penn chi Jim: 900/.,
V 1997 --
--
Pass
---
---
Pass
---
--•
Pass
---
---
Pass
NCO021024/001 Begm:B/t/1997 Frequency: QP/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec
+ NonComp:Single
1998 --
--
Pass
---
---
Pass
---
--
Pass
--
---
Pass
County: Person Region: RRO Subbasm: ROA05
1999 --
--
Pass
---
--
Pass
---
--
Late
Pass
--
Pass
PF: 5.0 special
2000 --.
-
Pass
---
---
Pass
---
--
Fail
>100
>100
Pass
7QIO: 0.0 IWC(%)99.87 Order'.
2001 -
Rutherfordton WWTP Perm chr lim: 71%
1997 Pass
-
-
Pass
--
---
Pass
---
--
Fail
Pass
--
NCO025909/001 Begin:7/1/1999 Frequency: Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct
+ NonComp:Single
1998 Pass
-
-
Pass
--
---
Late
Pass
-
Pass
--
--
County: Rutherford Region: ARO Subbasin: BRD02
1999 Pass
-
-
Pass
--
---
NR/Pam
--
--
Pass
--
--
PF: 3.0 Special
2000 Pass
-
-
Fail
Late
35.4
84.9, Late
BI
--
Pass
---
--
7QIO: 1.7 IWC(s/.):71 Order:
2001 Fail
S.S. Mobile Home Park Perm chr lim: 90%
1997 -
NR/Fail
Fail
Fail
NR/Pass
--
--
NR
Bt
--
NR/Fail
NR
NCO038300/001 Begin:11/1911996 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov
NonComp: Single
1998 Fail
Late
Fail
Fail
Late
Fail
Fail
Pass
--
--
Pass
--
County: Chatham Region: RRO Sublowin: CPF09
1999 -
Late
NR/Pass
--
Fail
NR/Fail
NR
Pass
--
--
Pass
--
PF: 0.01 Special
2000 --
Fail
Fail
Pass
Fail
Pass
--
Late
Pass
---
Pass
--
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%):100 Order:
2001 -
Sackner Products Perm chr lira: 90% (grab)
1997 ---
--
-
>100,>100t
59,28
--
-
-
---
--
---
NCO081779/001 Begin:2/l2000 Frequency:Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
+ NonComp:Single
1998 >100
--
-
---
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
---
County: Iredell Region: MRO Subbasin: YAD06
1999 48.99
-
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
-
--
PF: 0.0016 Spacial
2000 -
Fail
NR
NR
Fail
NR
NR
H
--
H
-
--
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%):100.0 Order:
2001 H
Salisbury -Grants Creek WWTP Penn chr lim: 7%h; exp 20MGD chr lim 6%
i 1997 --
--
Pass
---
--
Fail,Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
>90(s)
--
Fail
NCO023884/001 Begin:5/I/1996 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec
NonComp: Single
1998 Pass
--
Pass
---
--
Pass
--
---
Fail
Pass
-
Pass
County: Rowan Region: MRO Subbasim: YAD04
1999 •-
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
---
--
Pass
-
-
Pass
PF: 12.5 spatial
2000 --
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
--
-
Pass
--
-
Pass
7QIO: 263.5 IWC(%):7.0 Order:
2001 --
Salisbury-Sowers Ferry Road WWTP Penn chr lim: 17%
1997 Pass
-
-
Pass
---
NR/Pass
-
-
Pass
--
--
NCO025593/001 Begin: I/l/2001 Frequency: Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
+ NonComp:Single
1998 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
-
-
County: Rowan Region: MRO Subbasin: YAD04
1999 Pass
-
-
Pass
--
--
NR/Fall
Fail
Pass
Pass
-
--
PF: 0.75 Special
2000 Pass
--
-
Pass
--
--
Fail
Fail
<10
48
--
--
7Q10:5.8 1WC(%):17 Order.
2001 Pass
Salisbury -Town Creek WWTP PERM CHR LIM: 85 i„
Y 1997 -
---
Pass
--
--
Fail
Fail,Pass
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
NC(N)23892/001 Begm:8/1 /1994 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec
NonComp:SINGLE
1998 -
--
Pass
--
--
Fail
Fail.Fail
Pass
Pass
--
--
Fad,Fallt
County: Rowan Region: MRO Subbasin: YAD04
19" -
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
PF. 5.0 special
2000 -
---
Pass
--
--
Fail
Pass,94.9
89.9
H
--
---
H
7Q10: 1.4 JWCI".)94.7 Order
2001 --
Sanford -Big Buffalo WWTP Perm chr lim: 39%
1997 •-
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
---
---
Pass
---
--
Pass
NC0024147/001 Begin: 6/I/1996 Frequency: QP/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec
NonComp: Single
1998 ••-
---
Pass
---
---
Pass
---
---
Pass
---
---
Pass
County: Lee Region: RRO Subbasm: CPFI I
1999 --
---
Pass
---
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
--
--
NR/Pass
PF: 6.8 Special
2000 --
--
Pass
--
--
Pass
--
--
Fail
-75
>75
Pass
7QIO: 16.8 IWC(%):39 Order:
2001 •-
Sarlett Acres Perm chr Jim: 90% (grab)
1997 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
--
--
Pass
-
--
Fail
Pass
NCO061204/001 Begin:8/1/1999 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov
+ NonComp:Single
1998 -
Pass
-
--
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
--
--
Pass
--
County: Forsyth Region: WSRO Subbasin: YAD04
1999 --
Fail
Pass
---
Pass
-
--
Pass
--
---
Fail
Pass
PF: 0.02 Spacial
2000 •-
Pass
-
---
Pass
--
--
Pass
-
--
Pass
--
7QI0:0.0 IWC(%):100.0 Order:
2001 •-
Fail
V Pre 1997 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement LET = Administrative Letter - Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin = First month required 7Q10 = Receiving stream low Flow criterion (efs) += quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon Failure or NR Months that testing must occur - ex. Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF = Permitted Bow (MGD) 1 WC%= Insiream waste concentration P/F = Pus/Fail test AC = Acute CHR = Chronic
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow; * - Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by D WQ Aquatic Tox Unit; bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: --- = Data not required; NR - Not reported Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive. N - Newly Issued(To construct); H - Active but not discharging; t-More data available for month in question; - = ORC signature needed
40

Facility Name
NPDES #
Ow (MGD)
7010s (cfs)
/ WC (%)
Salisbury -Grant Cr.
NCO023884
Parameter=
Standard =
_ n
1
Cadmium
Parameter=
Cyanide
2
p I
Standard =
5
/igA
20
263.5
BDL=IJ2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
6.45
0 5
<1
Std Dev.
0.757680332
1
5
<10
Std Dev.
0.68352
Reeving Stream
-
Stream Class
Yadkin River
21
0.5
<1
Mean
0.627118644
2
;'.
5
<10
Mean
5.09434
WS-V
3
0.5
<1
C.V.
1.208192962
3
5
<10
C.V.
0.13417
4
0.5
<1
4
5
<10
i FINAL RESULTS
5
0.5
<1
5
5
z10
Cadmium
6
0.5
<1
Mu/t Factor =
2.3
6
5
<10
Mu/t Factor =
1.1
Max. Pred Cw
13.8
ug/I
7 0.51 <1 Max. Value 6 7 5 <10 Max. Value 10 PW
8 0.5 <1 Max. Pred Cw 13.8.W 51 <10 Max. Pred Cw 11
9 -0.5 <1 Allowable Cw 31.03 p I 91 5� <10 Allowable Cw 77.58 pg/
- - <1- -- - _ 10 5 <16 +
10 - 0.5
11 0.5- <1
12 0.5 <1 12 5 <10
13 0.5 <1 13 5 <10
14 0.5 <1 14 5 <10
t 15 0.5 <1 15 5 <10
16 0.5 <1 16 5 <10
17 0.5 <1 17 5 <10
18 0.5 <1 18 5 <10
19 0.5 <1 19 5 <10
20 0.5 <1 20, 5 <10
21, 0.5 <1 - J; 21 5 <10
22' 0.5 <1 22 10 <20
Allowable Cw
31.0
u
Max. Value
6
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw
11
ug/I
Allowable Cw
77.6
ugA
u�/I
ug/I
Max. Value 10
Copper 1
Max. Pred CwF 400
Allowable Cw108.6
Max. Value 250
Lead-----�-
- _-
Max. Pred Cw
5.5
ugA
Allowable Cw
387.9
u9A
Max. Value
5
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
7.2
ugA
23
0.5
<1T
23
51
<10
Allowable Cw
387.9
u I
24
0.5
<1
24
5
<10 -
<10
Max. Value
6
25
0.5
<1
25
5
Zinc --�
- - -
26
0,5
<1
-
26
5
<10
Max. Pred Cw
l 375
ugA
27
0.5
<1
27
5
<10
Allowable Cw'
775.8
u I
28
0.5
<1
28
5
<10
Max. Value 250
29
0.5
<1
29
5
<10
Silver
30
0.5
<1
30
5
<10
Max. Pred Cw 11
- -:
Allowable Cw 0.9
- ----- -
Max. Value 5
ugA
ug/I
-
31
0.5
<1
31
5
<10
32
0.5
<1
32
5
<10
33
6
6
33
5
<10
Chromium
34
0.5
<1
34
5
<10
Max. Pred Cw
5.5
ugA
35
0.5
<1
35
5
<10
Allowable Cw
775.8
ugA
36
0.5
<1
36
5
<10
Max. Value
5
37
0.5
<1
37
5
<10
�-
38
0.5
<1
38
5 <10
5 <10 +-- -
5 <10 +
5 <10
5 <10
5 _ <10
5 <10
5 <10
� 5. <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
-
5 <10'
5 <10
Max. Pred Cw
u /I
39
0.5
<1
39
Allowable Cw
u
40
0.5
<1
40
Max. Value
41
0.5
<1
41
42
2.5
<5
_
42
Max. Pred Cw
----
Allowable Cw
----
Max. Value
--
Max. Pred Cw'
-
-
u9A
u I
43
44
451
- _ 0.5
0.5
0.5
<1 i
�-
<1
- -- y- --
<1'
_ -*-- - ---- 43
441
45
-- - J
- -- - _46
I 47
T _
u /I
47
0.5
<1
Allowable Cw
ugA
48
0.5
<11
48
Max. Value
49
0.5
<1'
- 49
J14/Max. Pred Cw
u
50
51
0.5
0..5
<1
<1
501
51

Parameter=
Copper
Parameter=
Lead
Parameter=
Nickel
Standard =
7
ugll
Standard =
25,ug/l
Standard
25
ugll
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
50
<100
Std Dev.
36.21722
1
5
<10
Std Dev.
St
0.388
1
2.5
<5
St
Std Dev.
0.63688
21
501
<100
Mean
54.92063
;:_2
5
<10
M
Mean
4.939
2
2.5
<5
M
Mean
2.64407,
31
501
<100
C.V.
0.659447
3
5
<10
<10
C.V.0 V.
C.V.
0.0786
3
2.5
<5
C.V.
0.24087
41
501
<100
4
5
<10
4
2.5
<5
5,,
50
<100
5
5
<10
5
2.5
<5
6
50
<100
Mult Factor
1.6
6
5
<10
Mult Factor
1.1
6
2.5
<5
Mult Factor
1.2
7
50
<100
Max. Value
250
ug/l 7
5
<10
Max. Value
5
pg/l 7
2.5
<5
Max. Value
6
pg/l
8
50
<100
Max. Pred Cw
400
jjg/l iii:: 8
5
<10
Max. Pred Cw
5.5
pg/l Y 81
2.5
<51
Max. Pred Cw
7.2 j
jig/I
9
50
<100
Allowable Cw
108.61
ugll 9
5
<10
Allowable Cw
387.90
pg/l 9�
2.5 <51 !Allowable Cw_'_ 387.9-70�pg/l
-
2.5! <51
2,51 <5:
2.51 <5
2.5' <5,
2.51 <5,
2.15' <
10
50
<100
10
5
<10
10
11
10
10
11
2.5
<5
11
12
50
<100
12
5
<10
I 12�
13j
141
13
50
<100
... 13
5
<10
14
50
<100
14
5
<10
15
50
<100
15
5
<10
151
16
50
<100
16
5
<10
16
2.5'
<51
17
18
50
50
<100,
<100
17
18
5
5
<10
<10
17
18
2.5
2.5
<75
1 <51
19
50
<100
19
5
<10
19
2.5
<5
20
50
<100
20
5
<10
20
2.5
<5
21
50
<100
21
5
<10
21
2.5
<5
7-
22
50
<100
22
5
<10
22
2.5
<5
23
50
<100
23
5
<10
23
2.5
<5
24
50
<1001
24
5
<10
24
2.5
<5
25
50
<100
25
5
<10
25
2.5
<5
26
50
<100
26
5
<10
26
2.5
<5
27
25
<50
27
5
<10
27
2.5
<5
28
25
<50
28
5
<10
28
6
6
29
250
<500
29
5
<10
29
2.5
<5
30
250
<500,
30
5
<10
30
2.5
<5
31
50
<100
31
5
<10
31
2.5
<5
321
50
<100
32
5
<10
32
2.5
<51
33
50
<100
33
5
<10
33
2.5
<5
34
50
<100.
34
5
<10
34
2.5
<5
351
50
<100
35
6
<10
35
2.5
<5
36
50
<100
36
5
<10
36
2.5
<5
L
37
50
<100
37
5
<10
37
2.5
<5
38
50
<100
38
5
<10
38
2.51
-<5
39
50
<100
39
5
<101
391
2,51
<5'
40
50
<100,
40
5
<101
40
2.51
<5;
<51
I
41
50
<100
41
5
<10
411
2.5
42
50
<100
42
5
<10
421
.51
<10,
43
50
00
<100
43
5
<10
43
2.5
<5'
44
50
00
<100
44
5
<10
44
2.5
<5
45
50
<100
45
5
<10
45
5
5
46
50
<100
46
2.5
<5
46
2.5
<5
47
50
<100
47
5
<10
47
2,5
<5
481
50
<100
48
5
<10
48
2.5
<5
491
50
<100
49
5
<10
49
2.5
<5
O�Ot
511
501
501
<100
<100
-------
50
51
5
5
<10
<10
50
51
2.5
2.5
<51
<51

52
50
<100
53
50
<100
_
54
50
<100
55
50
<100
56
50
<100
57
50
<100
58I
501
<100
60•
_
5000
<100
_50T
- --- 61-_ --- --- 501
_-__-_--__-_-6_2j50j
631 501
<100
<100
<100
52
5
<10
53
5
<10
54
5
<10
55
5
<10
56
5
<10
57
5
<10
58
5
<10
59
5
<10
60
5
<10
61
5
<10
62
5
<10
63
5
<10
64
5
<10
65
5
<10
66
5
<10
67
5
<10
68
5
<10
69
5
<10
70
5
<10
71
5
<10
72
5
<10
73
5
<10
74
5
<10
75
5
<10
76
5
<10
77
5
<10
78
5
<10
79
5
<10
80
5
<10
81
5
<10
821
51
<10
52
2.5
<51
1_
53
2.5
<5
54
2.5
<5
55
2.5
<5
56
2.5
<5
57
2.5
<5
58
2.5
<5
59
2.5
<5
II I
--- ---
-- -- 4 - - - - -
3/14/01

Para eter=lChromium I
Parameter= IZinc
Pa aeter
Silver
-ug-/ I
Actual Data
Stadard ug/l
n� BDL=1/2DL. Actual Data RESULTS
(,RESULTS 1 5: <10'Std Dev. 0.368605•
IStd Dev. 0. 9063 2: 5. <10 Mean_ 4.945652.
Mean 0.7619 3 j 51 <101C.V. 0.074531
Standard =
nj
50
BDL=1/2DL
ug/l
Actual Data
RESULTS
Standard =
0.0
BDL=1/2DL
11
50
<100
Std Dev.
35.76195rl ,
1
0.51
<1,
2
50
<100
1 Mean
55.71429
2
0.5
<1
3
50
<100
C.V.
0.641881
3
0.5
<1
C.V.
1.18961
4
51
<101
4
50
<100
4
0.5
<1
5-
51
<10
5
50
<100
5
0.5
<1
6
5
<10
Mult Factor
6
50
<100
Mult Factor
1.5
6
0.5
<1
Mult Factor
2.2
7
5
<10
Max. Value
51/pi
/I
7
50
<100
Max. Value
250
pg/li?: 7
0.5
<1
Max. Value
5
pg/l� 8
5
<10
Max. Pred Cw
5.5
lugll
8
50
<100
Max. Pred Cw
375,46:
8
0.5
<1
Max. Pred Cw
11
ug/l::::: 9-
5
<10
Allowable Cw
775.80
9
50,
<100
Allowable Cw
775.80
pgll9
0.5
<1
Allowable Cw
0.93,ug/l::::::
10
2.5
<51
10
50
<100
10
0.5
<1,
11
5
<10
11
3
3
12
5
<10
12
50
<100
12
0.5
<1
13
5
<10
131 501
14' 501
<100
13
0.5
<1
14
5
<10
<100
14
0.5
<1
15
5
<10
151
50
<1001
15
0.5
<1
16
5
<10
16
50
<100
16
0.5
<1
17
5
<10
17
50
<100
17
0.5
<1
18
5
<10
18
50
<100
18
0.5
<1
19
5
<10
19
501
<100
19
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
20
21
5
5
<10
<10
20
501
<100
20
21
50
<100
21
0.5
<1
22
5
<10
22
50
<100
22
0.5
<1
23
5
<10
23
50
<100
23
0.5
<1
24
51
_<101
24
50
<100
24
0.5
<1
25
51
<101
25
50
<100
25
5
<10
26
51
26
50
<100
26
5
<10
27
51
-<1-0
27
25
<50
27
0.5
<1
E E 281
5
51
51
51--.------<10:
<10.
<10'
<101
<100
28
25
<50
E 28
0.5
<1
291
301
31:
32--
291
250
<5001
29
0.5
<I
3=0
250
<500
30
2
2
31
50
<100
31
0.51
<1
32
50
<100
32
0.5
<1
33
51
<101
33
50
<100
33
015
<1
34
5
<10
34
500
<100
34
0.5
<1
35
5
<101
35
50
<100
35
0.5
<1
36
5
<10
36
50
<100
36
0.5
<1
37
5
<10
37
50
<100
37
0.5
<1
38
5
<10
38
50
<100
38
0.5
<1
39
5,
<10
39
50
<100
39
0.5
<1
40
51
<10
40
50
<100
40
0.5
<1
41
5
<101
41
50
<100
41
0.5
<1
42
5
<10
42
501
<1001
42
0.5
<1
43
5
<10
43
50,
<100
43
0.5
<1
44
5*
<10
44
501
<100
44
2.5
<5
45
5
<10
451
50
<100
45
0.5
<1
46
5
<10
46
50
<100
46
0.5
<
47
50
<100
47
0.5
<1
48
50
<100
48
0.5
<1
50
<100
49
0.5
<1

501 501
<10011
50
0.5
<1
501
�501
<10011
51
0.5
<1
<10011
52
0.5
<1
53
501
<100
53
0.5
<1
54
501
<100
54
0.5
< 1
55
50
<100
55
0.5
<1
56
50
<100
56
0.5
<11
57
50
<100
57
0.5
<1
58
50
<100
58
0.5
<1
59
50
<100
59
0.5
<1
60
50
<100
60,
2
2
61
50
<100
61
0.5
<1
62
50
<100
621
0.5
<1
63
50
<100
631
0.5r-<l
3/14/01

FacilityName
NPDES #
OW (MGD)
7010s (cis)
IWC (%)
Rec'ving Stream I
Stream Class
Salisbury -Grant Cr.
NCO023884
+Parameter=
Standard =
n
1
2
Cadmium
-
Parameter=
snide
- _
2
/I
Standard =
5
pgA
BDL=1/2DLII
_ 0.&
0.5
ACtual Data, RESULTS n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS +_
<1 Std Dev. 0,757680332 :. 1 5 <10'.Std Dev. 0.68352
<1 Mean 0,627118644 _ 2, 5 <10 Mean 5.09434
<1 C.V. 1.208192962 3 5 <10 C.V. 0.13417
<1 1- 4 5 <10
<1 5 5 <10
<1 Muft Factor = 2.3 6 5 <10 Mult Factor
<1 Max. Value 6 Ajg/1 7 5 <10 Max. Value 10 Ng/i
<1 Max. Pred Cw 13.8 ug/I I: 8 5 <10 Max. Pred Cw 11 Ng/1
<1 Allowable Cw 29.20 Ng/I ! 9 5 <10 Allowable Cw 73.00 ug/1
<1 10 5 <10
<1 11 5 <10
<1 12 5 <10
<1 13 5 <10
<1 14, 5 <10
<1 15 5 <10
<1 16 5 <10
-
<1 !' 17 5 <10
<1 18 5 <10
-
<1 19 5 <10
:.:
<1 r 20 5 <10
<1 21 5 <10
<1 22 10 <20
<1 - 23 5 <10
263.5
6.85
Yadkin River
WS-V
3I
4
-- 0.5
FINAL RESULTS
5
0.5--
Cadmium
6
0.5
Max. Pred Cw
13.8
ugA
7
0.5---
Allowable Cw
29.2
ugA
81
0.5
Max. Value 6
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cwj 11
Allowable Cw - - 73.0
Max. Value' 10
Copper
Max. Pred Cw 400
Allowable Cw 102.2
Max. Value 250
--
Lead
Max. Pred Cw'l 5.5
9
0.5
10
0.5
ugA
11
0.5
ugA
12
0.5
13
0.5
u
141
15
0.5
0.5
u
16
0.5
_.1.-- - - - -
17
0.5
-
-
18
0.5
-
19
0.5
Allowable Cw: 365.0
Max. Value' 5
u
20
0.5
21
0.5
Nickel
22
0.5
Max. Pred Cw
7.2
ugA
23
0.5
Allowable Cw
365.0
ugA
24
0.5
<1
<l
<l
<1
<1
_
24
5
<10
Max. Value
6
25
0.5
251
5
<10
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw, 375
Allowable Cw, 730.0
u
u
26
27
28
0.5
0.5
0.5
26
5
<10
27
5
<10
281
5
<10 _
Max. Value+ 250
Silver
Max. Pred Cw' 11
Allowable Cw _ 0.9
Max . _ 5
- Value -
l
Chromium
29
0.5
<1
_
29! 5 <10
- -- - -
30 5 <10
31 5 <10
rt -- . - 32 5 <10
33 5 <10
34 5 <10
35 5 <10
_ 36 5 <10
37 5 <10
38 5 <10
_ 39 5 <10
40 5 <10
41 5 <10
42 5 - <10'
43 b <10
44 5 <10
30
0.5
<1
-
31
0.5
<1
u
I _ __ 32
-_--+--
' 33
34
_0.5
6
0.5
__ <1
b_
<t'
- -----
Max. Pred Cw
5.5
u
35
_
0.51
<11
Allowable Cwl
730.0
u
36
0.5
<t
�-
Max. Value
5
37
0.5
<l
Toluene
38
0.5
<1
Max. Pred Cw
119.25
u9A
39
0.5
<1
Allowable Cw
160.8
ugA
40
0.5
<1
Max. Value
25
41 0.5
42 2.5
43 0.5
44 0.5
<1
-
<5
- -
--
--
---
<1
<1
i-
45 0.5
<1
45
5
<10
- -----
46 0.5
<1
46
5
<10
- -
47 0.51 <1
- 48 0.5 <1
49 0.5<1
so 0.51 <1
51 05 <1
52 -- 0.5, <1
53 0.5!_<1,
1
47
5
<10
48
5
<10
49
5
<10
--------------
50
5
<10
51
5
<10
-
52
5
<10
_
531
5
<10

54
0.5
<11
1
54
5
<10
- _-
55
0.5
<1
55
5
<10
-
0.5
<1
56
5
<10
{
57
58
0.5
<1
57
5
<10
0.5
<1
58
5
<10
59
0.5
<l
59
5
<10
_
60
51
<10
61
51
<10
62
51
<10
63
5
<10
_
64
51
_
<10
- - -
65
51
<10
- -�
E E 66
51
<10
_
- - - -
_ 67 _ 5 <10--
�EEE -
-- 68 - - 5� <101 -
51 <10.
- - 7Q1 - - 5-- =<10'
71 . -
72; 5i <10'
73; --5'-
--
1
- --
- - - ---
75
76
5
5
<10'
<10
77
5
<10
78
5
<10
79
5
<10
80
5
<10
81
5
<10
82
5
<10
83
5
<10
84
5
<10
_
1
85
5
<10
86
5
<10
I
88
10
<20
89
5
<10
90
51
<10
91
5
<10
;-
--'`
921
5
- <101-
----- - - -
931
_5�_ <101 - -
------5--- --<101
51 <10;
J---- -
941
951
_
98�
5� <_101
99
5',
<101
-- - - -
---^- ---
100
5
<10
_-
------ -- ---
101
5
<10
102
5
<10
103
5
<10
104
5
<10
105
5
<10
106
5
<10
0

Parameter =
Parameter=
Lead
Parameter=
Nickel
Standard = 1
7 jpg/I
Standard =
25
pg/l
Standard =
25
jig/l
n
BDL=l /2DLI
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
50
<100
Std Dev.
36.2172
'r
1
5
<10
Std Dev.
0.388
:ii� 1
2.5
<5
Std Dev.
0.63688
2
50
50
<100
Mean
54.92063
3
2
5
<10
Mean
4.9391
2
2.5
<5
Mean
2.64407
_I-
3
50
<I 00
C.V.
0.659447
3
5
5
5
<10
<10
<10
C.V.
0.0786:
3
4
5
2.51
2.5
2.5
<5
<5
<5
C.V.
0.24087
41
50
<100
4
5
501
<100
5
6
501
<100
Mult Factor =
1.6
6
5
<10
Mult Factor=
1.1
6
2.5
<5
Mult Factor
1.2
7
501
<100
Max. Value
250
/jgIl 7
5
5
<10
<10
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
5
5.5
pg/I 7
pg/I 8
2.5
2.5
<5
<5
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
6
7.2,ug/l::.:
pg/l::::::::
8
501
<100
Max. Pred Cw
400
pg/l 8
9
501
<100
Allowable Cw
102.20
pg/l 9
5
<10
Allowable Cw
365.00,ugA::::
9
2.5
<5
Allowable Cw
10
11�
50
<100
10
5
<10
1
101
2.51
<5
10
10
j
11
2.5
<5
11 2 <5'
...... !. 45
121 2.5 <5
13' 251 <5,
_14. 2.5! <5
15 2.5 <5'
16 2.5' <5
17'. 225. <5
181 2.5! <5
1 19 2.5 <5
20 2.51 <5,
21 2.51 <5
121
50
<100
12
5
5
5
<10
<101
<101
131
--14-1
501
--io-T-
<1001
-<IOO-F--
13
141
15
50
<1001
157
5
<101
16
50
<100
161
51
<101
17
50
<100
17
51
<101
18
501
<100
18
51
<10
19
50
<100
19
5
<10
20
50
<100
20
5
<10
21
50
<1001
21
5
<10
22
50
<100
22
5
<10
22
2.5
<5
23
50
<100
23
5
<10
23
2.5
<5
241
50
<100
24
5
<101
24
2.5
<5
25
50
<100
25
5
5
<10
<10
25
26
2.5
<5
261
50
<100
26
2.5
<5
271
281
29T
25.
<50,
27
5
<10
27
2.51
<5
25i
2501
<501
28
5
<10
28
6
6
<5001
29
5
<10
29
2.5
<5
301
250i <500
30
5
<10
30
2.5
<5
3-1
501
<100
31
5
<10
31
2.5
<5
321
50
<100
32
5
<10
32
2.5
<5
33
50
<100
33
5
<10
33
2.5,
<5
34
50
<100
34
5
<10
34
2.5
<5
35
50
<100,
35
5
5
5
<10
<10
<10
35
36
37
2,5
2.5
2.5
<5
<5
<5
- - ------------------------
36
50
<100
36
37
50
<100
37
38
50
<100
38
5
<10
38
2.5
<5
39
50
<100
39
5
<10
39
2.51
<51
40
50
<100
40
5
51
<10
<10,
40 2
41i 2.51 <5
421 51 <10
'
432 <5 ,
441, 2.51 <5,
45 51 5
2.5
46 <5
41
50
<100
41
42
50
<100�
42
51
<101
43
501
<1001
431
51
<101
44
50
<1001
441
5
<101
45
50
<100
45
5
<101
46
50
<100
46
2.5
<5
47
50
<100
1
47
5
<10
471
2.5
<5:
<5
48
50
<100
48
5
<10
48
2.5
49
50
<100
49
5
<10
49
2.5
<5
50
50
<1001
50
5
<10
50
2.5
<5
51
50
<100
51
5
<10
51
2.5
<5
52
50
<100
52
5
1 <10
1
52
2.51
<5
531
50
<11
53
51
<101
53

54
50
<100
55
501
<100
56
501
<100
57
501
<100
58
501
<100
59
50
<1001
60
50
<100
61
50
<100
62
50
<100
63
50
<100
54
55
56
61
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
so
81
82
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
51 <10
51 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
5 <10
541 2.5 <5'
551 25 <5
56 2.5 <5;
57 2.5 <5 58 2.5L <-5�
59 2.51 <51 1
-- ---- --- --

Parameter=
Zinc
Parameter=
Silver
Parameter=.Toluene
Standard - 1.1 pg/I
n BDL=1/2DL'Actual Data RESULTS_
Standard =
50
pg/I
Standard =
0.06
pg/I j
_
j
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
50
<100
Sid Dev.
35.76195
1
0.5
<1
Std Dev.
0.9063
1
0.5� <1� Std Dev. 4_.699_3
2
50
<100
Mean
55.71429
2
0.5
<1
Mean
0.7619
2
0.5
<11
Mean _ _ 1.61
3
50
<100
C.V.
0.641881
3
0.5
<1
C.V.
1.1896
3
0.5
<11
C.V. T 2.93711
4
50
<100
4
0.5
<1
4
0.5
<1
-
5
50
<100
5
0.5
<1
5
0.5
<1
6
7
50
50
<100
<100
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
1.5
250
6
Ng/I 7
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
2.2
5
6
ugl€ 7
0.5
0.5
<5
<5
Mult Factor-�4.771
Max. Value
25
ug
8
50111
<100
Max. Pred Cw
375
pg/I:8
0.5
<1
Max. Pred Cw
11
pgA 8
0.5
<1
Max. Pred Cw
119.25
pg/I
- _
9;
50
<100
Allowable Cw
730.00
pgll 9
0.5
<1
Allowable Cw
0.88
pg/f 9
0.5
<1
Allowable Cw
160.60
pg/I
_
10, 50i <100
11, 601 - 6011
1
10
0.5
<1
10
0.5
<5
11
3
3
11
0.5
<1
12, 5_0, <100'
501 -<1001
12
13
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
12
13
0.5
<5
2
2
141
_
501 <100
14
0.5
<7
14
1.3
1.3
151
50; <100
15
0.5
<1
15
21
21
16
501
<100
16
0.5
<1
16
0.5
<1
17
18
50
50
<100
<100
17
18
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
17
18
2
0.5
2
<1
-f
_
19
50
<100
19
0.5
<1
19
0.5
<1
20
50
<1001
20
0.5
<1
20
0.5
<11
I_
21
50
<100
21
0.5
<7
21
0.5
<1
22
50
<100
22
0.5
<1
22
0.5
<11
-
23
50
<100
23
0.5
<1
23
-
--- 0.5�
<1 T
-
24
50
<100
24
0.5
<1
E 24
.. _ 251
261
, ---- - --- ;
1 27
281
:: 291
30
0.5- <1
251 <50,
0.5 <1
- 5 - - -
i 0.5._ _ _ _ <1
0.5 <1,
0.5 <1
0.5; <1;
- - - 25F_
_26F
271
S
291
30
_
501
- 501
<100
25
5
<10
!
i
--<10011
-
j 26
::::
5
<10
25
251
250
250
_ <50
<501
<5001
<500
r
::: 27
i E 28
29
30
0.5
0.5
0.5
2
<1
<1
<1
2
j
T--r-p
31
50
<100
31
0.5
<1
31
0.51
<11
_
32
50
<100
32
0.5
<1
32
0.5
<11
1
33
50
<100
33
0.5
<1
ii�33
0.5
<1
j
34
50
<100
34
0.5
<1
34
0.5
<1
35
50
<100
35
0.5
<1
35
0.5
<1
36
50
<100
36
0.5
<1
36
0.5
<1
37
50
<100
37
0.5
<1
37
0.5
<1
38
50
<100
38
0.5
<1
38
0.5
<1
501
<100
39
0.5
<1
39
0.5
<1
_39
40
_
501
<100
_
40
0.5
<1
40
0.5
<1
- -
_ 41;
42_
_
_50�
50
<100
<100,
41
42
0.5
0.5
<l
<1
41
42
0.5
0.5
<i
<1
431
50
_
<100
43
0.5
<1
43
0.5
<1
441
50
<1001144
_
2.5
<5
44
0.51
<1
_
45
50
<100
45
0.5
<1
45
1.21
1.2
_
46
50
<100
46
0.5
<1
47
48
50
50
<100
<100
47
48
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
49
50
<100
49
0.5
<1
50
50
<100
50
0.5
<l
I
- ----- - -
51
501
<10011
51
0.5
<1
52
50
52
0.5
<l
53
501
<10011
531
0.5
<1

541
50
<100
54
0.5
<1
55
56
501
501
<100
<100
1
55
56
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
57
50
<100
57
0.5
<1
58
50
<100
58
0.5
<1
9
50
<100
59
0.5
<11
60
50
<100
60
2
61
50
<100
61
0.5
<1
62
50
<100
62
0.5
<1
63
50
<100
63
0.5
<1

-Par—anv—ter-=-I-T—CE
Parameter=
Selenium
Parameter =
Silver
Standard
0.81,ug/I
I
Standard =
5
/ig/I
Standard =
0.06
DMR 99-00
n
BDL=1/2DL
IActual Data
RESULTS
:il;—,
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
Jan-00
0.5
<1
Std Dev.
5.62069
1
Std Dev.
#DIV/01
1
Std Dev.
#DIV/O! ,
0.5
<1
Mean
1.789471
2
Mean
#DIV/O!
2
Mean #131V/01
0.5
<1
C.V.
3.140971
3
C.V.
#DIV/O!
3
jC.V.
#DIV/01
0.5
<1
4
4
0.5
<1
5
5,
Mult Factor 1 1.2_ 6: Mult Factor
Max. Value olpg/!,:: 7 Max. Value 0 Ng/
rViax. Pred Cw _�90�g/i':' 8 Max. Pred Cw 0 Ng/
Cw 73.0-1---'91 Allowable Cw 0.88./jg/
10
-
0.5
<1
Mult Factor
6
0.5
0.5T<1
251<50
<1
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
25
0
j 11.681/ig/l
/jgA 7
pg/l 8
9
!Allowable
0.51<1
0.51<1
10
0.51<1
0.5
<1
0.5
<1--
1 0.51<1
0.5
<1
0.5
<1
0.5
<1
0.5
<1

Parameter =
Chromium
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
33

2B/01
FacOy Name
Salisbury -Grant Cr.
Parameter=
Cadmium
_
' ` Parameter=
Cyanide
- -
NPDES#
NCO023884
Standard=
2
- ----
is ^ Standard =
51p11
Ow (MGD)
7.5
_�_
7D10s (Cfs)
263.5
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
I RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data RESULTS
IWC (%
4.23
1
0.5
<1
Std Dev.
0.757680332
1
5
c 10 Stl d Dev. 0.68352
Recidn Stream
Yadkin River
2
0.5
cl
Mean
0.627118644
2
5
_
<10 Mean 5.09434
--
Stream Class
WS-V
3
0.5
<1
C.V.
1.208192962
3
5
<10 C.V. 0.13417
4
0.5
<1
4
5
<10
!
FINAL RESULTS
5
0.5
<1
2.3
5
6
5
5
<10
<10MuR
Factor =
1.1
Cadmium
6
_
0.5
<t
Wit Factor=
Max. Pred Cw
13.8
UgA
7
_
0.5
<1
<1
<1
- - <l,
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
6
_
7
5
< 101
Max. Value
10
Allowable Cw
47.3
u9A
8
0.5
13.8
/rg/I 8
5
<10
Max. Prod Cw
11
Max. Value
6
9
0.5
47.33
pW 9
5
<10
Allowable Cw
j 118.33
Cyanide
10
0.5
10
5
<10
Max. Prod Cw
j 11
ugA
11
0.51
<1 -
_ 11 5 <10,
- - - -
12 5 <10
_ 13 5 _<10 _
14 5 <10
- -.
15 5 <10
-; -. -
16 5 <10
17 5 <10
18 5--- <10
19 5 <10 _
20 5 <10
21 5 <10
-- -- --- ---
22, 10 <20 -
23, 5 <10 _
24 - -- ---�-
- - -
5 <10
25. 5 <10
2 5 <10
- - - - - -
27 5 <10 - -
28' S - <10
.`. 29, 5 <10
30; 5 <10 I
31, 5 <10,
32S <10
;.; 33 5 <10
34 5 <10
I 35 5 <10
AllowableCw!
118.3
u
12
0.�_-- <1 -
0.5 <1 + _
-,
0.5 <1
- - -
0.5 <1
- --
0.5, <i
0.51 c1
0.5� <1' - -`::
0.51 <1
0.5 <1
0.5 <l,
- _--i'
0.5 <1 _
0.5 <1 � �
0.5 <1
Max. Value_
10
13
Copper
14
Max. Pred Cw,
400
u
15
Allowable Cw
165.7
u
16
Max. Value
250
17
Lead
18
Max. Pred Cw
5.5
uyl
19
Allowable Cw
591.7
ugA
20
Max. Value
5
21
Nickel
22
Max.Pred
ax. Pred Cw
AlloCw
7.2
59L1
u
u yl
23
24
Max. Value
6
25
0.5
0.5
0.5
<1
<I
<1
-
---rt--i;i-
Zinc
26
Max. Pred Cw
375
u
27
Allowable Cw
1183.3
ugA
1 28
0.5
0.5
0A
0.5
0.5'
61
0.5-
cl
<1
<1
<1
<11
- 6
<t
- - - - -
Max. Value
250
29
Silver
30
Max. Prod Cw
1 11
ugn
31
Allowable Cw
1.4
ugA
32
Max. Value
5
33
Chromium
34
Max. Pred Cw
5.5
u
35
0.5
<1
_
Allowable Cw
1183.3
ug4
36
0.6
<1
-
36
37
38
39
5
5
5
5
<101
<10
<10
<10
-- - -
Max Value
5
37
0.5
<1
38
0.5
<1
_
Max. Pred Cw
u
39
0.5
<1
_ _
Allowable Cw
u9A
40
0.5
<11
40
5
<10
Max. Value
41
0.5
<1
41
5
<10
42
2.5
<5
42
5
- - - - -
<10
Max. Pred Cw
u
43
0.5
<1
43
5
- <10
--
Allowable Cw
uyl
u9A
44
451
46
47
48
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
<1
<1
<11
1--___�1
- I
44
45
46
471
_- 481
5 <10
5 - - <10
5 <10
5 <10
- 5 <10
5 <10
5- <10
5__ _ <10
5 <10
_
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw!
AllowableCw -
Max. Value_
-_-
Max. Pred Cw'
Allowable Cw
49
0.5
<1
491
- - - 50
`E 51
52
uyll
50
51
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
---
_'
_
ugA
521
0.5
<1
Max. Value'
53
0.5
<t
+- --
_
53
5
- --<16
_
_ _
54
0.6
<1
E 54
5
<10
_
55
56
57
0.5
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
<l
'' 55
56
57
5
<10
�- - -
_
5
5
<10
<10
58
0.5
<1
58
5
<10
59
0.5
<1
59
5
<10
60
5
<10

2/8/01
61
5
5
5
<10
<10
<10
62
63
64
5
<10
65
5
5
5
<10
<10
<10
66
67
68
5
5
<10
<10
69
70
5
<10
71
5
<10
72
5
<10
73
5
<10
74
5
<10
75
5
<10
76
5
<10
77
5
<10
78
5
<10
79
5
<10
80
5
<10
81
5
<10
82
5
<10
83
5
5
<10
<10
84
85
5
<10
86
5
<10
87
5
<10
88
10
<20
89
5
<10
90
5
5
<10
<10
91
92
5
<10
93
5
5
<10
<10
94
95
51
51
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125

2/8/01
Parameter=
Copper
Parameter =
Lead
Parameter=
Nickel
Standard
7
1jgA
Standard =
_L5
gg/l
Standard
251,ugA
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual
---6.388
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
50
< 100
Stcl Dev.
36.21722
1
51
1
2.5
<5
Stcl Dev.
2
50
<100
Mean
54.92063
2
5
<101mean
4.939
2
2.5
<5
Mean
3
50
<IOOIC.V.
0.6594471
3
5
<10
C.V.
0.0786
3
2.5
<5,
C.V.
4
50
<100
4
6
<10
4
2.5
<5
5
50
<100
5
5
<10
5
2.6
<5
6
50
<100
Mult Factor=
1.6
6
5
< 10
Mult Factor=
1.1
-i:i-
6
2.5
<5
Mult Factor
7
50
<I 00
Max. Value
250
jjgA 7
5
<I 0
Max. Value
5
7
2.5
<5
Max. Value
8
50
<I 00
Max. Pred Cw
400
jig/l 8
5
<I 0
Max. Pred Cw
5.5,ugA
8
2.5
<5
Max. Pred Cw
9
50
<I 00
Allowable Cw
165.67,ug/l
9
5
<10
Allowable Cw
591.67
jigA 9
2.5
<5
Allowable Cw
�iii] 10
50
<100
10
5
<10
10
2.5
<51
1
11
10
101
11
2.5
<5
11
2.5
<5
12
50
<100
12
5
<10
12
2,5
<5
13
50
<100
13
5
<10
13
2.5
<5
14
50
<100
14
5
<10
14
2.5
<5
15
50
<100
15
5
<10
15
2.5
<5
16
50
<100
16
51
<10
16
2.5
<5
17
50
<100
17
5
5
<10
<10
17
18
2.5
2.5
<5
<5
18
50
<100
18
19
50
<100
19
5
5
<10
<10
19
iii 20
2.5
<5
20
50
<100
20
2,5
<
21
50
<100
21
5
5
<10
<10,
21
22
2.5
<5
22
50
<100
22
2.5
<5
23
50
<100
23
5
<10
23
2.5
<5
24
50
<100
24
5
<10
24
2.5
<5
25
50
<100
25
5
<10
26
2.5
<5
26
50
<10DI
26
5
<10
26
2.5
<5
27
25
<50
27
5
<10
27
2.5
<5
281
25
<50
28
5
<10
28
6
6
291
250
<500
29
5
<10,
29
2.5
<5
301
250
<500
30
5
<ib
30
2.5
<5
31
50
<100
31
5
<10
31
2,5
<5
32
50
<100
32
5
<10
32
2.5
<5
33
50
<100
33
5
<10
33
2.5
<
34
50
<100
34
5
<10
34
2.5
<5
35
50
<100
35
5
<10
35
2.5
<5
36
50
<100
36
5
<10
36
2.5
<5
37
50
<100
37
5
<10
37
2.5
<5
38
so
<100
38
5
<10,
38
2.5
<5
39
50
<100
3 9
5
<10
39
2.5
<5
40
50
<100
40
5
<10
I 40
2.5
<5
... 41
50
<100
4 1
5
<10
41
2.5
<5
42
50
<100
4 2
5
<10
42
5
<10
43
50
<100
43
5
<10
43
2.5
<6
44
50
<100
4 4
5
<10
44
2.5
<5
45
50
<100
45
61
<10
45
5
51
46
50
<100
46
2.51
<5
46
2.5
<5
47
50
<100
47
5
<10
47
2.5
<5
48
50
<100
48
5
<10
48
2.5
<5
49
50
<100
49
5
<10
49
2.5
<5
50
50
<100
50
5
<10
50
2.5
<5
51
50
<100
51
5
<10
51
2.5
<5
52
50
<100
52
5
<10
52
2.5
<5
53
50
<100
53
5
<10
53
2.5
<5
54
50
<100
54
5
<10
54
2.5
<5
55
50
<100
55
5
<10
55
2.5
<5
56
50
<100
56
5
<10
56
2.5
<5
i*: 57
50
<100
57
51
<10
57
2.5
<5
58
58
5
<10
58
2.5
<5
59
.501
<1001
59
51
<10
59
2.5
<5
601
501
<1001
60
51
<101
I

2/8/01
61
501
<100
61
5
<10
62
50
<100
62
5
<10
63
50
<100
63
5
<10
64
5
<10
65
5
<10
66
5
<10
67
5
<10
68
5
<10
69
5
<10
70
5
<10
71
5
<10
72
5
<101
73
5
<101
74
5
<101
75
5
<10
76
5
<10
77
5
<10
78
5
<10
79
5
<10
80
5
<10
81
51
<10
82
5
<10

2/810
Parameter =
Zinc
Parameter=
Silver
i:: Parameter=
Arsenic
Standard=
50
ligA
Standard
0.06
pg/l
Standard=
50
U
n
BDL=112DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=112DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
6'688
0.63688
1
50
<100
Std Dev.
35.76195
1
0.5
<1
0.9063
1
Std Dev.
#DIV/O!
2.64407
124
2
50
<lDO
Mean
55.71429
2
0.5
<1
IMean
0.7619
2
Mean
#DIV/01
0[1
7 0.240087
31
50
<100,C.V.
0.641881,
3
0.5
<11
C.V.
3
C.V.
#DIV/O!
4
50
<100
4
0.5
<11
1
4
5
50
<100
1 5
0,5
<1
5
6
50
<100
Muft Factor=
1.5
6
0.5
<11
Muft Factor
2.2
6
Mutt Factor
6,
50
<100
Max. Value
250
pg.4.:; 7
0.5
<1!
Max. Value
5
pgfi:: 7
Max. Value
Ojpg/I�ii
4:81
50
<100
Max. Pred Cw
375
pg/E::;: 8
0.5
<11
Max. Pred Cw
11
/ig/[:: 8
Max. Pred Cw
01
591.64pkA
91
50
<100
Allowable Cw
1183.33
p 9
0.5
<I!
Allowable Cw
1.42
pg/I::; 9
Allowable C-
118333
ioll":
10,
50j
<100
10
0.51
<1 IL
1
10
i
ill
12
I iiij 13
60
50
501
60
<100
<1001
11
12
13
31
0.5
0.5
3
<1
<1,
11
12
141
501
<100
14
15
50
<100
15
N
<11
I
16
50
<100
16
0.5
<1
17
50
<100
17
0.5
<
18
50
<100
18
0.5
<1
19
50
<100
19
0.5
<1
20
21
22
50
50
50
<100
<100
<100
20
21
22
0.5
0.5
0.5
<1
<1
23
50
<100
23
0.5
<1
24
50
<100
24
0.5
<1
25
50
<100
25
5
<10
26
50
<100
26
5
<10
27
25
<50
27
0.5
<1
28
25
<5011
28
0.5
<1
29
250
<500
29
0.5
< 1
30
250
<500
30
2
21
31
50
<100
31
0.5
<1
321
50
<100
32
0.5
<1
331
50
<100
:i: 33
0.5
<1
34
50
1
<100
34
0.5
<1
100
35
0.5
<1
36
50
<10011
36
0.5
<1
37
50
<100
37
0.5
<1
38
50
<100
38
0.5
39
50
<100j
39
0.5
<11
40
50
<100
40
0.5
<1
41
50
<IDO
41
0.5
<11
42
50
<100
42
0.5
<11
43
50
<100
43
0.5
<1
44
50
<100
44
2.5
<5
45
50
<100
45
0.5
<1
46�
50
<100
46
0.5
< I
471
50
<100
47
0.5
<1
48=
50
<100
48
0.5
<1
491
50
<100
49
0.51
<1
50
50
<100
50
0.5
<1
51
50
<100
51
0.5
<1
52
50
<1001
62
0.5
<1
53
50
<1001
53
0.5
<1
:j:j 54
50
<100
54
0.5
<1
55
50
<100
55
0.5
< I
56
50
<100
56
0.5
<1
57
1 50
<1001
57
0.5
<1
581
50
<1W
iii 58
0.5
<1
591
50
211,1106000060
59
0.5
-C,
50
<10C]601
<IODF
60
2
2

t
F1L VI M
Parameter =
Mercury
Parameter=
Selenium
Parameter=
Silver
Standard =
0.012
/rg/I
Standard =
5
ug/l
i Standard =
0.06
.ug/I
n
6DL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
Std Dev.
#DIV/01
1
Std Dev.
#DIV/01
1
Std Dev.
#DIV/0!
2
Mean
#DIV/O!
2
Mean
#DIV/01
2
Mean
#DIV/01
3
C.V.
#DIV/01
3
C.V.
#DIV/OI
3
C.V.
#DIV/01
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
Mult Factor=
2
6
Mult Factor=
1.2
6
Mult Factor =
6.1
7
Max. Value
0
pgA i 7
Max. Value
0
7
Max. Value
0
pg4
8
Max. Pred Cw
0
Ng/I 8
Max. Pred Cw
0
ug/1 8
Max. Pred Cw
0
pg k
9
Allowable Cw
0.28
Ng/I i:i 9
Allowable Cw
118.33
/JO 9
Allowable Cw
1.42
ug/f :
10
10
10
11
11
11

CO
Parameter=
Chromium
Standard =
50
ug/I
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
5
<10
Std Dev.
0.368605
2
5
<10
Mean
4.945652
3
5
<10
C.V.
0.074531
4
5
<10
5
5
<10
6
5
<10
Mult Factor =
1.1
7
5
<10
Max. Value
5
ugA
8
5
<10
Max. Pred Cw
5.5
ug/l
9
5
<10
Allowable Cw
1183.33
u9/I
10
2.5
<5
11
5
<10
12
5
<10
13
5
<10
14
5
<10
15
5
<10
16
5
<10
17
5
<10
18
5
<10
19
5
<10
20
5
<10
21
5
<10
22
5
<10
23
5
<10
24
5
<10
25
5
<10
26
5
<10
27
5
<10
28
5
<10
29
5
<10
30
5
<10
31
5
<10
32
5
<10
33
5
<10
34
5
<10
35
5
<10
36
5
<10
37
5
<10
38
5
<10
39
5
<10
40
5
<10
41
5
<10
42
5
<10
43
5
<10
441
5
<10
451
5
<10
461
5
<10
2/8/01

ioxicam tAnaiysis/z)ansoury
Facility Name Salisbury -Town Creek Parameter = NI Parameter = F_ I_ _
�.
NPDES NCO023892 Standard = 88 _ _- _-_# - p - I Standard = 1.8 m /I
Q1 (MGD)5 -T �;DL=1/2D Actual Data RESULTS 7Q10s (cfs) 69.75 n BDL=1/2DL ctual Data RESULTS i
IWC (-) 10.00 1 2.5 <5 Std Dev. 3.119228648 11 0.7 0.7 Std Dev. 0.16733
c ving Stream Yadkin River 2. - 2.5 <5 Mean 3.176470588 2 0.7 0.7 Mean 0.56'
Stream Class WS-V 3 2.5 <5 C.V. 0.981979389 3 0.7 0.7 C.V. 0.29881
4 - - 2.5 <5 -- 4 0.8 0.8 T
- -- -_ -
FINAL RESULTS 5 2.5 <5 5 0.6 0.6
Ni 6 2.5 <5 Mult Facto 2.1 6 0.7 0.7 Mult Facto 4.9
Max. Pred Cw 50.4 ugA 7 2.5 <5 Max. Valu 24 Ng/I 7 0.8 0.8 Max. Value 0.8 Ng/
Allowable Cw 880.0 ugA 8 25 <5 Max. Pred 50.4 Ng/i 8 0.8 0.8 Max. Pred ( 3.92 ug/
Max. Value 24 9 2.5 <5 Allowable 880.00 Ng/l 9 0.7 0.7 Allowable C 18.00 Ng/
FI 10 2.5 <51, 10 0.7 0.7
Max. Pred Cw 3.92 rngl 111 2.51 <5 11 0.7 0.7
Allowable Cw 18.0 mg 12 2.5 <5 12 0.7 0.7
Max Value 0.8 13 12 12 13 0.6 _ 0.6
14 2.5 <5 14 0.6 0. b
---T - - 15 - 2.5 <5 15 0.6 0.6 --- -
16 2.5 <5 16 0.6 0.6
_ 17 2.51 <5 17 0.61 0.6
18 2.51 <5 18 0.3 0.3 -
j - 19, 2.5 - - <6--- 19 0.5 0.5
20 2.5 <5' 20 0.4 0.4
21 2.5 <5 21 0.4 0.4
22 2.5 <5 22 0.3 0.3
23 2.5 <5 23 0.2 0.2
24 2,5 <5 24 0.3 0.3
T 25 2.5 <5 � I - --
- - -- -- - 25 0.4 0.4
26 2.5 <5 26 0.5 0.5
27 2.5 <5 - 27 0.51 0.5
I
28 2.5 <5 _ 28 0.4 0.4
13 13 29 3 +--- - -- - -
- ---- _ i _ -i_ 29 0.61 0.6
30 2.5 <5 30 0.41 0.4
- -- 31 2.5 <5 31 - - --- -
32 2.5 <5 32,
�- 33 2.5 <5 - 33 - f
34 2.5 <5 34
35 2.5 <5 3511
36 2.5 <5 36
- - - - -
1 37 2.5 <5 � 37
38 2.5 <5 - - 38
--- --- - T...-- - -- -+ -
1 39
--- -- 40 2.5 <5� -- -
-- 40
41 2.5 <5 41
2001

r,
Toxicant Analysis/Salisbury
38
2.5
<5
42
39
2.5
<5
43
40
2.5
<5
44
_
41
2.5
<5
45
38
2.5
<5
46
_
39
2.51
<5
47
_
I
401
2.5
<5
48
41
2.5
<5
491
- --- —r----
--
50
2,5
<5
--r— 50-
_
- -_--�
---
51
2.5
<5
51
j
52
2.5
<5
52
53
2.5
<5
53
_
54
2.5
<5
54
55
2.5
<5
55
—_
56
2.5
<5
56
57
2.5
<5
57
58
2.51
<5
58
59
24
24
59
60
2.5
<5
60
61
2.5
<5
61
- —
62
2.5
<5
62
_
63
2.5
<5
63
_
64
2.5
<5
64
_
65
2.5
<5
65
_
66
2.5
<5
66
_
67
2.5
<5
67
68
7
7
68
A
2/8/01

Salisbury permit
eI
2002 ie'�ei � z
Subject: Salisbury permit
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 15:16:41 -0400
From: Michael Parker <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Mooresville Regional Office
To: Teresa Rodriguez <[e-mail]>
Teresa,
I circulated the subject draft permit to MRO staff that have some interest with
this facility either through inspections or compliance review. 2 errors on the
transmittal letter were noted in the 2nd paragraph - "Phosphorus" is misspelled,
and "form" should be "from".
There is also still some disagreement regarding the rationale for determining
compliance with the 85% removal requirement, but rather than "rocking the boat"
any further, we are moving on with this issue.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment.
Teresa Rodriguez wrote:
> This are the latest draft letter and permit for Salisbury.
> Thanks for taking time to look at it in such short notice.
> Teresa
Michael Parker - [e-mail]
Environmental Engineer II
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
919 N. Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax: [phone]
Michael Parker <[e-mail]>
Environmental Engineer II
NC DENR - Mooresville
Division of Water Quality
1 of 1 5/1/01 3:18 PM

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 7, 2001
Memo To: Teresa Rodriquez k-✓qr RQ qF/ 1r�
From: Rex Gleason V
Prepared By: Michael Parkerr� h�r9e�'e
0
Subject: Regional Comments on Draft Permit iN;ng
City of Salisbury
NPDES Permit No. NCO023884
Rowan County
Per your request, this Office has reviewed the subject draft Permit and offer the following
comments. Please note that these comments follow previous comments forwarded to you regarding
this facility in an email dated February 6, 2001 from Mr. Wes Bell with this Office and summarized in
item No. 1 below.
1. Presently, the Town Creek and Grants Creek WWTPs are still being operated as two separate
WWTPs and only the effluents from both WWTPs are combined before disinfection and
reaeration. The now expired Grant's Creek WWTP Permit (which is the process of being
renewed) includes the influent and effluent monitoring for BOD and TSS (85% removal
requirement). Mr. Bells'question was, and still is, with two separate influent outfalls, should
the City sample at each influent outfall or just the Grants Creek influent outfall for compliance
with the removal requirement? The City samples the influent at each WWTP; however, only
the influent result for the Grants Creek WWTP is reported on the DMR. Once again, should we
have the City sample at both influent locations, and if so, should we have them average the two,
or, should we allow the City to only sample and report the Grants Creek WWTP influent
'results. It is unclear in the draft permit how this requirement is to be met.
2. Requiring Salisbury to sample the effluent from the Town Creek WWTP is inconsistent and
does not meet the definition of "effluent" as defined in the NCAC .0500 regs. Effluent is
specifically defined as "after all treatment components", which is clearly not the case here. As
an example, there is another WWT facility in this region that has two completely separate
treatment trains (ie..two separate treatment plants), but only one set of effluent limitations and
that is CMUD's McAlpine Creek WWTP. Therefore, based on the reasons above, we
recommend that effluent testing at the Town Creek WWTP be dropped.
3. Section A(3), first paragraph - "Town" misspelled.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please advise.
hAgen\gmemo.doc

NCO021491
Facility:Grants Creek WWTP
Discharge to: Yadkin River
Stream class and index #: WS-V
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7Q10 (CFS)
263.5
7Q10 (CFS)
263.5
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
7.5
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
7.5
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
11.625
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
11.625
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
4.23
IWC (%)
4.23
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
402.33
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
18.68
minimum = 2
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
N/A
Fecal Limit
200/100m1
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
7.5
Ratio of 22.7 :1
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
11.825
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
#VALUE!
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
#######
minimum = 4

NCO0223884
Facility:Grants Creek and Town Creek WWTP
Discharge to: Yadkin River
Stream class and index #: WS-V
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7Q10 (CFS)
263.5
7010 (CFS)
263.5
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
12.5
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
12.5
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
19.375
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
19.375
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
6.85
IWC (%)
6.85
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
248.20
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
11.61
minimum = 2
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
N/A
Fecal Limit
200/100ml
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
12.5
Ratio of 13.6 :1
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
19.375
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
#VALUE!
Allowable Concentration (mg/I)
#######
minimum = 4

YADKIN RIVER BASIN
Name of Stream
Subbasin
Stream Index Number
Map Number
Class
YADKIN RIVER (including Falls Lake below
YAD08
12-(136.3)
F18NE4
WS-IV&B
normal operating levels)
YADKIN RIVER (including lower portion of Falls
YAD08
12-(136.7)
F18NE7
WS-IV&B CA
Lake and upper portion of Lake Tillery below
normal operating levels)
YADKIN RIVER (including lower portion of Falls
YAD09
12-(136.7)
F18NE7
WS-IV&B CA
Lake and upper portion of Lake Tillery below
normal operating levels)
YADKIN RIVER (including lower portion of High
YAD04
12-(114)
E17NE8
WS-IV&B
Rock Lake)
YADKIN RIVER (including lower portion of High
YAD04
12-(124.5)
F18NW3
WS-IV&B CA
Rock Lake, Tuckertown Lake, Badin Lake)
YADKIN RIVER (including lower portion of High
YAD08
12-(124.5)
F18NW3
WS-IV&B CA
Rock Lake, Tuckertown Lake, Badin Lake)
YADKIN RIVER (including upper portion of High
12-(108.5)
E17NW3
Rock Lake below normal operating level)
YADKIN RIVER (including upper portion of High
YAD06
12-(108.5)
E17NW3
WS-V
Rock Lake below normal operating level)
YADKIN RIVER (including upper portion of High
YAD07
12-(108.5)
E17NW3
WS-V
Rock Lake below normal operating level)
Yates Creek
YADO1
12-26-9
C13NW9
C
York Creek
YADO1
12-46-4-10-1-1
B14SE3
C
Page 27 of 27

Date: doo
I
Time:
TELEPHONE RECORD
Project:
❑ Return Mr./Mrs. Representing:
❑ Call to Address
❑ Call from
Telephone: V. 3 GU FAX:
Subject:
NOTES/ SUMMARY
-G
ko-k
5LL,6�,-MLL A-d
Lc. - x, kJL0,U--.
(t(`(f C/-�- (ter,
.e 9 0,214
NEEDED FOLLOW-UP ACTION(S)
1.
BY WHOM/WHEN
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
cc: Signed

Date: 02 15
Time: q,,�D
❑ Return
❑ Call to
❑ Call from
TELEPHONE RECORD
Project: 10 U,!:(4
Mr./ Mrs. Representing:
Address
Telephone:©�f _ (� - ,O FAX:
Subject: I)pit.Yx. t
NOTES/
SUMMARY
77u Uki r oa6 or4 7_55 arc, &7%.)
IJ-
V
.c Ike iS h.D
55 7
NEEDED
1.
FOLLOW-UP ACTION(S)
BY WHOMIWHEN
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
cc: Signed

6as�lo
Dn. C U QQ u ut"k
CI, -I-
I11
Division of Water Quality
MEMO Date 5% /,2-/ O/
To: �C. a Subject:
uc .C.e d etsc
%s a� L4
w /7
d V C e3i'.I.Za At ce- C aic 4 JL
t/
a", d C i� ✓� J/
Lem
� Goo JI •� ���� /- �
J
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
77
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

NC DO
Is
cxons cr-�*
CO
�5
7.5 M Gb
60 D 00 2
-P,5
p, :� c 002-
Y11twuAor "6-Dt� S - Z ajld 7:7
'f"pur(is C-� - poi44b-A-�G--y Pt f, ©D3
T— LOW — um,
v�
Co mki ne-d
-'UA-U r2 - a0 1,A6b
op
YA D 1un)

Mr. David Goodrich
NPDES Unit Supervisor
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Applications
NPDES No. NCO023884 Grant Creek WWTP
NPDES No. NCO023892 Town Creek WWTP
City of Salisbury
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
d-
January 27, 1998
2 p
JAN 3 0 1998
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
You will find enclosed the NPDES permit renewal applications and fees for the subject facilities.
There are two issues associated with the permit renewals that I would like to bring to your
attention.
As you are aware, the City of Salisbury is in the process of relocating the discharge from both
facilities out of Grant Creek and Town Creek to the Yadkin River. The original construction
schedule for the series of projects necessary to accomplish the relocation anticipated discharge to
the Yadkin River by July 31, 1998, the expiration date of the current permits.
Construction on the Grant Creek WWTP effluent pump station and 36-inch force main, 60-inch
effluent outfall, ultraviolet disinfection/cascade aeration structures and the effluent diffuser began
in February, 1997. In September, 1997, the City was forced to halt construction on the diffuser
and demobilize from the river until the issue of whether the project required an easement from
Yadkin, Inc. under authority of their FERC license was settled. After negotiations with FERC
and Yadkin, Inc. officials in Washington, D.C., Yadkin, Inc. agreed to give the City an easement
in December, 1997. The contractor installing the diffuser was not able to return to work in
December due to low river levels and will not be able to remobilize until March, 1998. In
addition, construction on the Town Creek WWTP effluent pump station and force main has not
begun due to the fact that the force main had to be relocated as a result of environmental
concerns raised during the State Clearinghouse review. The plans for the Town Creek effluent
pump station and force main are currently under review by the Construction Grants and Loans
Section, and we anticipate awarding bids by May, 1998.
CITY OF SALISBURY
UTILITIES MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION
400 N. CHURCH ST., SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA 28144 PHONE: [phone], FAX: [phone]

i
Due to the delays on the projects mentioned above, the effluent from the two treatment plants
will not be relocated to the Yadkin River by July 31, 1998. The new completion date for all the
relocation projects is May 31, 1999. We request that the renewed permits allow continued
discharge to Grant Creek and Town Creek at the existing effluent limitations until May 31, 1999.
The second issue has to do with upstream and downstream monitoring. The City of Salisbury is
a member of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Association. The Association is currently
finalizing a Memorandum of Agreement to allow a contractor to perform stream monitoring for
all members. We request that language be included in the special condition section of the
permits to address this arrangement. It should be specifically stated that the City would not be
required to perform upstream and downstream monitoring included on the limitations pages as
long the City is a member of the Association and the Memorandum of Agreement is in effect.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact me at [phone].
Enclosures
Sincerely,
M
I
John C. Vest, P.E.
Utilities Director

n
Grant Creek WWTP
I
NCO023884
STANDARD
K-ChM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL
WASTE CONTRIS T ICN TO ,MUNIC;PAL SYSTcivl
SUbMit a desaiotion of each major indusmal fcillty dischatafng to themuniacal system, using a separate Section IV for each
facity descipaon. Incicam the 4 dgit Stancare
Industrai Classrflcat cri (SIC) Coca for the incustry, lie major oroeuc: or raw
matenai. he flow (in thousand gallons oer eav). anti the cnaramensacs of the wastewater ciscargee �c n the incus=t faciity
into the municipal system. Consult Table tll for stancam measures ai procu= -r,aw matenats. (see insaucdons)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructons)
Name
401a
National Starch - Cedar Springs
Cedar Springs Rd
Number & Street
401b
PO Box 399
C.ty
401c
Salisbury
County
401d
Rowan
stam
401e
North Carolina
Zip Cade
401f
28145-0399
2 Primary Stancard Industrial
4M
2869-414-H
Classification Code(see Insaucfons)
3. Primary Pradud: or Raw Material
Unas(See
(see tnstru=ons)
Cuantiry Tace 411
Produm
aoea
Organic Chemicals 403c
4t739
Raw Material
4035
Z3d
I
303f
1
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discnarcea into the municicai sys-
tem in thousana gallons cer cay
ana wnether This discharge is
intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided Indicate if
pretreatment is provideo oricr :o
entering the muntcpat system.
6. Ch2raoredstics of Wastewater
(see instruccens)
404a
4C4b
405
325 - ousand cailons oer day
InterminentOnt) 71 Continuous (can)
C Yes [ No
ra,—r„e.er I BOD, I COD Name TSS TKN NH3
rarametar
Numoer I 00310 100340 00530 I 00625 I 0061(
Value I 93.6 11080.3 I 226.7 I 35.9
Name--
i Pb
j Ho
Ni
?(±'XiBs`°�<'c-
rarartteter
I
Number
01051
71900
t 010E
Value
, 0.0083
<0.0002
10.034
i arme*tr
Name
Al
+ F
Mn
E
01105
00950
0105E
I 1 175
+ 4.85
Cd Cr
01027 101034
<0.001 0.011
Ag
Zn
I PHENC
01077
101092
132730
<0.013
0.099
TPHOS
I CI
I TDS
00665
100940
L: 70300
15.0 I
903
Cu
i CN
01042
00720
0.083
f <0.0087
As I Be Se
01002 I 01012 01147
0.015 I <0.010 r <0.025
l

Grant Creek WWTP
NC 0023884
STANDARD rCSM A - MUNICIPAL
SECT, ON IV. INDUSTRIAL WAS TS CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICPAL SYST2.11
Submit a desattion of each maior industrial facility discharaina to the municical system, using a separate Secdcn IV 'or each
ftdity description. Incicate the 4 o1git Stancarc Industrial Cias_siffcaticn (,IMS) Czca for The incustry: ne maior procuc: or.aw
crL qrsc, .ensu= or
tr.e -c-
matenai, he low (in ihousand gailcns oer cav), ana the wastewater cisc:,argea from n ine incust mi facifty
into ;he municipai system. Consult Table III 'or stancam measures of prc--u= craw matenais. (see instructions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instru�cns)
Name 401a Reynolds Metals - Salisbury Can Company
Number & Street 401h 200 Peeler Road
city 401c Salisbury
County 401d Rowan
Stale 401e North Carolina
Zip Code 401 f 28144
z Primary Stancard Industrial 402 3411-403-D
Classification Code(see Instruc-dons)
a Prirnauy Producrar Raw Material units(See
(see instru=ons) Cuantitv Tame ill)
Product 403a Aluminum Cans
Raw Material 403b Wd 403t
4. Row Indicate the volume of water
cuscnargea into the municiomi sys-
tem in mousana gallons Der aay
ana whether nis dscrarge is
intermittent or conl3nuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided Indcare if
pretreatment is providea orfor -o
entering the munjapai system
S. Characteristics of Wastewater
(see instruc-.cns)
404a
4C4b
4M
80 1 a per day
.nousand gallons '
[:I Imermirtenvint) Fv Continuous (can)
LK Yes 7, No
earameter
Name
BOD
COD
TSS
I TKN
NH3
Cd
I Cr Cu CN
Parameter
Numoer
00310
00340
ff
100530
I 00625
00610
I 01027
01034 01042
I 00720
Value
I 117.7
I 1076.1
I 115.3
I 25.6
5.00
I -10.001
10.018 I <0.055
1<0.0075
Parameter
Name
Mer
Number
I Pb
101051
I HQ
I 71900
Ni
101067
Ag
101077
Zn
01092
I PHENOLSI As I Be'
32730 1002 1
0 01012
Se
-
01147
Value
10.010
1<0.0002
I 0.030
110.001
10.124
I 0.099
<0.005 I <0.001
<0.005
eter , J N'me
Al
I F
r
I Mn
I TPHOS
I Cl
TDS
�11(01 105
00950
01055
00665
00940
70300
:.��N=.,,7
V Value I
I aiue 1
34.4
I 8.27 10.473
I 0.215
62.0
1498

1 ,
Grant Creek WWTP
STANDARD FCF:M A - MUNIC;PAL
SECT ICN IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRISUTiCN TO ,MUNIC;PAL SYSTEM
Submit a descriotion of each maior industrial facility discharaing to the munidoal system, using a separate Sac9en IV or each
facity description. Incicare the 4 aigit Stancara Industrial Classrfiratton (SIC) Coca for the industry, fie maior Froeuc or raw
matertai. Ire dqw, (in thousand gailens per cav), aria the ctarac:ensacs of the wastewater cis=,argec t c^t me incus—= faciity
intorfe municipal system. Consult Table III br smncara measures of proau= ar ,aw matenais. (see ins—nucdons)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see mstruc�ons)
Name 401a American & Efird, Inc.
1310 Richard Street
Number & Street 401b
City 401c Salisbury
County 401d Rowan
Stam 401e North Carolina
Zip Code 401f 28144
2 Primary Standard Industrial 4M 2261
Classification Code(see instruc:iens)
3. Primary Produc. or Raw Material Unfts(See
(see instruc:ons) Cuantiry Tacie ill)
produG 403a Textile - Yarn ; 4011—,
Dyeing & Bleachin
Raw Material 403b 403d 4Wf
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discriaraea into the municioai sys-
tem in thousana gallons eer aay 4 4a 900 ttousand gailons per day
ana whether Otis ctscarge is
intermittent or continuous. 4C4b [ Intermittent(intl [ Continuous (can)
5. Pretreatment Provided Indicate if 405 [ Yes [ No
pretreatment is =video oriar to
entering the muntcpai system
6. Cham=Hsdcs of Wastewater
(see instrucz.ons) ff
Name star I BOD I COD I TSS I TKN I NH3 I Cd Cr I. Cu
Cn
?tea.: `;v��>< rarameter
Number I 00310 100340 00530 100625 I 00610 I 01027 101034 I` 01042 I 00720
ac5t>=v<?> value + 93.7
I 824 42 I 14 2.80 I <0.006 0.019 0.038 0.012
Narae eter + Pb Hg
Ni I Ag I Zn I PHENOL As Be + Se
Number I 01051 + 71900 I 01067 I 01077 101092 132730 101002 I 01012 01147
Value 0.032 ,10.0002 0.039 I <0.001 0.045 I <0.005 I <0.001 f <0.005
rarame*ter +
Name AI + F Mn I TPHOS I CI I TDS
rammezer
a...... ; Number 01105 + 00950 01055 0665 I 00940 I 70300
Value + <1.00 10.75 + 0.06 1.33 17.5 I 532 + I

GC WWTP
NC 0023884
STANDARD PCFZM A - MUNICIPAL
SEC TAICN IV. INDUSTRIAL WAS79 CONTRIBUTION TO hMUNIC.PAL SYST::vI
Submit a dese'otion of each major industrial facility disdfareino to the municical system, using a separate Secdon IV for each
facity description. Incicam the a digit Stancam Industrial Classification (Sic) Coca for the incustry, Me major omauc: or raw
matertat, tie dow (in thousand gailons oar cay), ana the cnarac:enstics ar the wastewater cisa:argec frcm me inaustrtat faafity
into the municipal system. Consult Table III for smneara measures of prccu= pr mw materials. (see insrzrucdons)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instrut„ ons)
Name 401a Freirich Foods
815 West Kerr Street
Number & Street 401b PO Box 1529
city 401c Salisbury
County 401d Rowan
State axle North Carolina
Zhp Cade 401f 28145-1529
2 Primary Stancard Industrial 402 2013
C:assi6cation Cade(see Ins:ru=,'cns)
3. Primary Produc. er Raw Material Units(See
(see instrucuons) Cuantity Taote ill)
ProduG 4Ma Meat Processing 40�
Raw Material 403b 43d a03f
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
disc haraea into the munih«cai sys-
tem in vicusana gailons oer day
ana whether this dscrvge is
intermittent or canilnuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided lndrate if
pretreatment is =video orior to
entering the muntcpai system
6. Clharactaristics of Wastewater
(see instrucacns)
rarmemr
90 "tousand gailons per day
Ei Iniemtirtentant) M Continuous (can)
fX Yes No
>< Name BOD I COD I TSS I TKN I NH3 Cd Cr
Value
earame,
Name
rraramet
Number
Value
00310 100340 00530 00625 1 00610 1 01027 101034
965 1,336 167 I 105 1 182 1 <0.001 1 <0.010
Pb Hg Ni Ag I Zn IPHENOLSI As
01051 171900 01067 01077 01092 32730 01002
<0.010 <0.0002 0.005 <0.001 0.29 ( <0.005
Al + F Mn I TPHOS CI TDS
01105 00950 01055 00665 00940 70300
<1.00 0.41 ' <0.30 ' 72 1,174 3.924
Cu
J CN
01042
00720
<0.10
10.012
I Be Se
01012 I 01147
<0.001 f 10.005
j�
I I
I

Grant Creek WWTP
NC 0023884
STANDARD FCRM A - MUNIC;PAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL
WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYST=—:vl
Submit a desami don of each major industrial facility discharalns b the muniacal system, using a separate Section IV for each
facity description. Inccate the 4 aigit Stancare Industrial
Classification (SIC) Coca for the incustry, Tie maior aroauc. or raw
material. Ire riaw (in thousand gailcns Der cav), and the cnaractansacs of Me wastewater ciscnargea `c: n Me incusm faciity
into the municipal system. Consult Table III 'or stancara measures of procucz; or aw materials. (see inset c ons)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instrutwons)
Name
4012
Car -Del Fabrics
Richard Street
Number & Street
401b
PO Box 1107
City
401c
Salisbury
County
401d
Rowan
Slate
401e
North Carolina
Zip Code
atilt
28145-1107
2 Primary Stancard Industrial
402
2297
Classification Code(see Instrucions)
a Primary Produc: or Raw Material
Unas(See
(see Instructions)
Cuantitv Taere ill)
Product
4o3a
Manufacture &
aC3c
40;e
warehouse non -
Raw Material
4 3b
woven fabrics
43d
a03f
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
aischaraea into the munidcai sys-
tam in i iousana gallons Der aa}%
ana whether this ascriarge is
intermittent or continuous.
5 Pretreatment Provided Indicate if
pretreatment is provides oricr to
entering the municipal system
6. Clharacaristics of Wastewater
(see instruccens)
404a
4p4b
4CS
2 thousand caflons per day
Ei Intermirtent(int) rA Continuous (con)
X,Yes [No
arameter
Nam
Nam
BOD COD TSS I � TKN NI
rarameter
Numcer
i 00310 00340 00530 00625 0061
Value
+ 4,046 1197,273 2,033 2.571 58.1
ever
Pb
i Hg
Number
01051
71900
value
0.016
0.0017
rarme*ter
Name I
Al
F
e�_rraamNurnoe
01105
00950
Value
5.65
0.91
Ni
0106'
0.008
01055
<0.06
Cd
Cr
Cu
J CN
01027
01034
1l 01042
I 00720
<0.001
0.024
1 <0.10
0.042
Ag
Zn
JPHENO
01077
01092
132730
<0.001
0.45
10.013
TPHOS
CI
TDS
00665
00940
70300
61.4
35.6
78,865
As
01002
Be
01012
+ Se
01147
<0.005
<0.001
1<0.005
I

•
-..� ,.:�:y� ��� I
Grant Creek WWTP
NC 0023884
STANDARD
F-CPM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WAS 9 CONTRIBUTION TO ,MUNIC:PAL SYSTE'VI
Submit a description of each maior industrial facility discharaino to the munieeal system, using a separate Secaen IV for each
facity description. Incicate the 4 dgit Stancare Industnal dess,iicmaon (SIC) Coca for the incustry, Tie maior croauc, or aw
material. lie hfow, (in thousand gailcns Der eay), and the
cnaractenstics ar the wastewater cisctargea `rc,n the incusm faclity
inm the municipal system. Consult Table III br stancara measures ai procu= cr .aw matenais. (see instructions),
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see insa'uc ons)
Name 401a
Lyon Shaw, Inc. (Div. of Winston Furniture)
1538 Jake Alexander Blvd. West
Number & Street 401b
PO Box 2069
City 401E
Salisbury
County d01d
Rowan
State 401e
North Carolina
Zip Code 401f
28145-2069
2 Primary Stancard IndustrW 402
2415-433-A
Classiifcation Cade(see Instrucfans)
a Primary Product or Raw Material
Units(See
(see instruccons)
Cuantity Tacie 411
Pmm,cr 4g3a
Welding Wrought 403-- 403e
Iron Furniture
Raw Material 403b
*3d 4Wt
1
4. Flow lnd =e the volume of water
disctaraea into the muniGDai sys-
12
tem in tiausano gallons cer aay 4l 4a
"housand gallons per day
ana whether 71is dscr.Tge is
intermittent or continuous. 4c4b
[ Intermirtent(int) fXi Continuous (con)
5. Pretreatment Provided Indicate if 405
L Yes No
pretreatment is pxovidea oricr :o
entering the municpai system
6. Chamc:3dsties of Wastewater
(see instruc ons)
"•;:`::•":'•':: Parameter
Name I BOD _ I COD I
I
TSS I TKN I NH3 Cd Cr I. Cu
CN
rarameier I 00340 00310 1+
Number I
00530 100625 I 00610 101027 I 01034 11 01042
100720
Vatue I 47.0 I 51.1 I
16.6 I 12.2 I 2.89 10.0015 I <0.010 ! <0.10
I 0.0075
Parameter ame Pb I
NHg I
Ni I Aq Zn IPHENOLSI As I Be
Parameter
:•' >:>::;:::::`.` Number I 01051 I 71900 101067
101077 101092 132730 101002 101012
Se
01147
X Value
..0.12 0.002 I
110.005
<0.005 <0.001
J Vame I Al + F
Mn I TPHOS I Cl I TDS
-arame�sr
ivurroer 101105 I 00950 I
01055 100665 100940 I 70300 I I
value I <1.00 I 0.81 I <0.180 I 8.14 17.7 177.5 I I
I

• ` :...1 �1V-3C:YI. i .CSC I
Grant Creek
NC 0023884
STANDARD FCr-M A - MUNICIPAL
SECn, ON IV. INDUSTRIAL
WASTE CONTRIBU T1CN TO MUNICSPAL SYSTEM
Submit a descr'otion of each major Wusmal hadlity disatareing b the municical system, using a separate Secden IV for each
fadity description. Incicare the 4 aigit Stancare
Industrial C.assmcaaen (SiC) Coca for the incustry, Tie major oroeuc: or raw
matenai. lie dow (in thousand #lens per aay), and the cnarac:ens,=" a( a wastewater cisc:argee frc n the incus—s—i faaiity
into ;he municipal system. Consult Table III for stancara measures of procu= or rw matenais. (see ins7ucdons)
1. Ma(or Contributing Facility
(see instntctons)
Name
401a
Hitachi Metals, Ltd. of North Carolina
1 Hitachi Metals 15rive
Number & Street
401h
China Grove, NC 28023
city
401c
Salisbury
County
401d
Rowan
slam
axle
North Carolina
7jp Code
aolf
28144
2 Primary Stancard Industrial
402
3264-471-J
Classification Code(see Instruc°ons)
S. Primary Product or Raw Material
Urlts(See
(see tnstrucsons)
Cuantitv Tame ill)
Product
4c a
Manufacturing
40-1--
4t),4e
Ferrite Magnet
Raw Material
403b
.103d
4mf
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discrtareee into the municipai sys-
tem in tiiousana garlons oar cay
ana whether mis aisctarge is
intermittent or continuous.
S. Prerreatmem Provided lndeate if
pretreatment is providea orfor:a
entering the mun=pai system
6. Chamc:aristics of Wastewater
(see instructions)
404a
404b
445
250 "tousand gailons per day
Ei Intermittenttint) Ti Continuous (con)
Pt Yes C No
vame
i BOD
COD
TSS
TKN
NH3
CdI
Cr
!. Cu
I CN
Parameter
Numcer
00310
f
I 00340
00530
00625
00610
' 01027 101034
1i 01042
I 00720
Vaius
58
I 111
49
I 18.2
107
I 0.002 1
0.191
1 0.151
<0.008
Pe arate merNam
rarme sr
Number
Pb
01051
�<0.010_
Hg
171900
Ni
01067
A
101077
Zn
01092
PHENOLS1
I 32730 I
As
01002 I
Be
01012
' Se
I 01147
value
i 1
<0.0002 0.007
<0.001
<0.10
+ I
I
f
Parameter 1
Name I
l
Al I
F
Mn
I TPHOS
Cl
TDS
earamezier
Number
01105
00950
01055
00665 '
00940
70300
Vaiue I
<1.00
1.63 +
0.37 ,
107
I 495
!
I

NARRATIVE OF SLUDGE MANAGEIENT PLAN
APPENDIX IV-5 lIYFORMATION _. ON. _MATERIAL.. TO_.BE LAND APPLIED -
TREATIM=1 PROCESS OF SALISBURY WASTEWATER
T3E:ATsYIETI'T FACILITY
The City of Salisbury owns and operates two wastewater treatment facilities. The two
treatment plants are the Granes Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant located on Grubb Ferry
Road and the Town Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant located at the end of Heiligtown
Road.
Grant's Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility
The Grant's Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility is a conventional wastewater treatment
facility. The plant is designed for 75 MGD and operates at a flow of 5 MGD. As raw _
sewage enters the treatment plant, a grit ;chamber and bar screen removes. grit, sand and
other debris. The wastewater stream is pumped to the primary settling basins, the heavy
residuals settle to the bottom of the basins, light solids float to the top of the basins.. TThe ..__
bottom residuals are scrapped by mechanical scrapers. The solids at the -top of the basins.'.,
are removed by surface mechanical scrapers. All residual solids -are pumped to a. thickner :
and then transfered to aerobic digesters. rMe effluent continues through the process train
to an areation basin and enters a chlorine contact chamber-prior*to discharge to Grant's
Creek' - -
The aerobic digested sludge from Grant's Creek is pumped from the digestors to tanker
trucks and transfered to the Residuals Management Dewatering Facility located at .Town
Creek
Town Creek Wastewater Treatment Facf�ity
The Town Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility is a conventional wastewater treatment*
facility designed for 5 MGD and operates at 3 to 4 MGD. - The daily flow enter the
treatment plant, a grit chamber and bar screen removes grit, sand, and other debris..The _
wastewater stream flows to a primary clarifier and to aeration basins. -The flow:continues*
to secondary clarifiers and to the chlorine contact basin prior to release to Town Creels
The primary sludge and waste activated sludge is pumped to aerobic digesters. The sludge
is pumped to the Residual Management Dewatering Facilty.
Town Creek Residuals Management Dewatering Facility
Liquid sludges from the Grant's Creek and Town Creek Wastewater Treatment Plants are
processed at the Residuals Management Dewatering Facility. The liquid sludges are
processed in a plate and frame dewatering press. The digested liquid sewage" sludge is
concentrated to a solids consistency of 30-40%. The dewatered cake sludge is.dropped into
a hydraulic ram elect dump trailer and transported to the Residuals Management Storage .
Building. After approximately 60 days of storage, the dewatered sludge is loaded into dump'
trucks and transported to approved land application receiver sites.

Kip
1
. u
- • "-S- /L [IW
M U.•1 ,•, ,• YV 111• • L \J "i•Q'! N 1111•+: II I IL.i 1®'
1
1
• eeagNpARY-
CLAYIfF18R
.c
I
I
11• 1
Y •
•-----• SHIDGE
• RECIIICUl.A11011
PARBIIALL FLUME GRANT CRCEK
WASTE 1RfAIIdfNT PIAIII
sulseul;r, � c.
BOREW PIJMP OTATION
8AR BGJIEE110 l URIT CIIAMBERB PAROALL FLIIME
BPLIYTER B X — CHLORINE BABIN ADDITION
CASCADE AERATOR
.1 L • 7 . • .
SCHEMATIC OF WASTEWATER FLOW

LONG TERM MONITORING PLAN REQUEST FORM
FACILITY: Grant Creek WWTP (-54[-1-560/2y
NPDES #: NCO023884
EXPIRATION DATE: 07/31/98, but being changed to 06/30/99.
REGION: Mooresville Regional Office
NPDES UNIT REQUESTER: Jeff Myhra
DATE OF REQUEST 01/27/99 1
INDICATE THE STATUS OF THE PRETREATMENT PROGRAM: [?]
1. The facility has no SIUs and should not have pretreatment language.
2. The facility has e ievefepiWa pretreatment program.
3. Additional conditions regarding the pretreatment program are attached.
PERMITTED FLOW: 7.5 MGD
% INDUSTRIAL 28%
% DOMESTIC 72%
fit �-
0V\
�- ► r r 1 I�—�^ u Pic e 4 I P() C k5 41 do-e- ,--, Sl-����
��.
64rore
VI43 �Ve -47� i1P�L3
f}s rrjo +Se Dike `to 503,5��9e.

6,/ f�l of -
11,16
�3/3/99
".
■�■�■_■_
7.
�
1 11
�
1 11
�
1 11
�
1 11
•
©
1 11
��^n/
11
�
1 11
�
1 11
• . •a
1 11 ,�
/ 11
�
1 11
�
1 11
1/ 1
Oi�E
1 11
E
1 11
'�A■_■_■■
-. - .-
�
111
�
1 11
�
1 11
®
111
-. - .-
�
1 1 1�
1/ i■_■_
Oren
Memo
ESWMMI. -
M
1 11
E
1 11
1 11
1 11
. - . -
■_■_■_■_
Grant Effluent
Grant Effluent
0 CD
o
o w
o a
CO
o f
rn
o
o W
o a
M
o
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
January
January
February
February
March
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.001
0.014
March
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.001
0.006
April
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.001
0.010
April
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.001
<
0.005
May
May
June
June
July
July
August
August
September
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.001
0.006
September
<
0.010
<
0.010
<
0.001
0.011
October
October
<
0.010
<
0.010
<
0.001
0.010
November
<1
0.005
<1
0.005
<1
0.001
0.009
November
December
I
I I
I
I
December

To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Review Engineer: Charles Weaver
SOC Priority Project: No
Date: September 4, 1998
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County: Rowan
NPDES Permit No.: NC0023884
MRO No.: 98-67
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION=
1. Facility and Address: Grant Creek WWTP
M,�.
% City of Salisbury
:Jmq,
0M
Post Office Box 479
r
Salisbury, N.C. 28145
2. Date of Investigation: August 28, 1998
`n
_
3. Report Prepared By: Michael L. Parker, Environ. Engr. II
4. Person Contacted and Telephone Number: Mr. Barrett Lasater, [phone].
5. Directions to Site: From the junction of SR 1915 (Hollywood Drive) and SR 1820
(Grubb Ferry Road) in the Town of Spencer, travel east on SR 1820 approx. 0.2 mile. The
WWTP is located on the right side of SR 1820.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge Points: -
Latitude: 350 44' 07"
Longitude: 800 26' 50"
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: E 17 NW
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): There is limited area available at the
existing WWTP site for expansion, if necessary.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The WWTP is located at or near the
flood plain elevation of Grant Creek, however, the WWT units are partially elevated and
receive some protection from flooding.

Page Two
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: None within 500+ feet of the WWTP.
10. Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: Yadkin River
a. Classification: WS-V
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin 030704
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The receiving
stream is the main segment of the Yadkin River, which is used for primary and
secondary recreation. The Town of Spencer (NC0025593) discharges approx.
500+ yards below this outfall.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Volume of Wastewater: 7.5 MGD (initial), 12.5 MGD (upon the addition of Town Creek
WWTP effluent).
a. Current permitted capacity: 7.5 MGD
b. Actual treatment capacity: 7.5 MGD
C. Description of existing or substantially constructed WWT facilities: Instrumented
flow measurement followed by a parshall flume, mechanical bar screen with grit
chamber, two primary clarifiers, two trickling filters, one aeration basin with
mechanical aeration, three secondary clarifiers with polymer addition, a screw
pump station, gaseous disinfection with contact basin, post aeration basin
(diffused), two aerobic digesters, a sludge thickener, sludge DAF unit,
dechlorination, and stand-by power.
d. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: This facility has passed recent toxicity
tests.
C. Pretreatment Program: Approved.
2. Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied specify DEM Permit No. WQ0001956.
b. Residuals Contractor: AMSCO, Inc.
c. Telephone No. [phone]
d. Residual Stabilization: PSRP
3. Treatment Plant Classification: Class IV (No change from previous rating)
4. SIC Code(s): 4952 2099 2261
Wastewater Code(s): Primary: 01 Secondary: 81, 55, 58

Page Three
5. MTU Code(s): 04003
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants Funds (municipals only)?
Public monies were used in the construction of this facility.
2. Special monitoring requests: The current Permit requirement for effluent Toluene
monitoring should be reevaluated prior to permit reissuance.
3. Additional effluent limits requests: None at this time.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The City of Salisbury (the City), has requested the renewal of the subject permit. Changes
to this facility since the last Permit was issued include the construction of an outfall line from
Grant Creek directly to the Yadkin River. Along with the outfall line, effluent disinfection
(ultraviolet) and an effluent diffuser has been constructed. As of the date of the site investigation,
the outfall line had not as yet been placed into operation, however, final inspections of the line
were underway. The City anticipated the outfall line to be activated by mid to late September.
The renewed Permit should note the addition of the new outfall line and the Yadkin River as the
new discharge location. This outfall relocation is part of a master plan that will ultimately end
with the construction of a new WWT facility and the elimination of the City's Grant Creek and
Town Creek W WTPs.
The City is also looking at the possiblity of additional WWTP construction, however, no
timetable has been set as of yet. Possible new and/or modified treatment units are tertiary
treatment, a new clarifier, replacement of existing aeration equipment, and a conversion of the
exisitng aeration basin into an oxidation ditch.
Pending receipt and approval of the WLA, it is recommended that the Permit be reissued
as requested.
Signature of eport Preparer Date
>4�v�1, - ors
Water Quaq egional Sue isor Date
h:\dsr\dsr98\gantcrk. sr

w\-j rPs
7 ja.-g3ao
4C .
p C 1 I
wc�
Cky►*a - � \ ►£r �Ql-in �G- a3 — SIVIIs�tty
US es
I,s�',��s�- ���d
�dl levy i 14 s
\/v vv -�P
wV\,rr P
I. J G�S
S+q ��r

•, 9
9
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
OCD
c�
C3W,
Cr
O
3: L�
J
A C'
I, 1 v I aA ,, �S , as a duly registered Professional E if eer in the
State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe full time) the
construction of the modifications and improvements to the Grant Creek WWTP, located on Grubb
Ferry Road in Rowan County for the City of Salisbury, hereby state that, to the best of my abilities,
due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following construction:
Additional sludge treatment and storage to include a 3 hp grinder, 250 gpm progressive
cavity pump, 2-meter sludge dewatering belt filter press, polymer activation and feed
system, 2-foot covered belt conveyor system, prefabricated covered loading station and a
22,500 sf sludge storage pad and metal shelter.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial
Signature
Date
and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Mail this Certification to the
gistration No. l ` /- FV
NPDES Unit
DENR/DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
%t�a�irsxfitexa��
•�% "V A ®/♦+ski
SHAL
• 9480 yy