NC0023884_Application_20181220

December 13, 2018
Ms. Wren Thedford
NCDEQ/ DWR/ NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RECEIVED/DENR/DWR
DEC 2 0 2018
Water Resources
Permitting Section
Re: City of Salisbury Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Permit Renewal NCO023884
Dear Ms. Thedford,
The City of Salisbury (The City) requests the renewal of the City of Salisbury WWTP
permit No. NCO023884 and submits the attached permit application and supporting documents
for renewal of the subject permit which expires on June 30, 2019.
The City requests the removal of the Ultraviolet (UV) system from the subject permit
renewal. The City will continue to use the liquid chlorination system (for disinfection) and the liquid
dechlorination system (to remove the residual chlorine). Also requested is the removal of the two
trickling filter units from the Grant Creek Wastewater Treatment Train. Both units are currently
offline and will be repurposed as equalization basins in the plant's future construction
improvements (see B.5. attachment).
The City has monitored the effluent from March 15, 2017 through July 11, 2018 for the
silver parameter. The results of the nine sampling events show < 1 ug/I. Silver is monitored
quarterly in our Pretreatment Long Term Monitoring Program. The Silver Data Summary and
Metals Calculator are attached.
A Preliminary Engineering Report prepared by CDM Smith summarizes the proposed
improvements to the Grant Creek Wastewater Treatment Train to replace aging equipment and
to provide more operational flexibility within the plant. A copy of the Construction Summary and
Construction Timeline is attached (B.5.).
Please contact me at [phone] if you require clarification or additional information
regarding the subject renewal package.
Sincerely,
Sonjaras-inger
Environmental Services Manager
1 Water Street Telephone [phone]
Salisbury, NC 28144 Fax [phone]

Enclosures (Application + supporting documents)
cc: Mr. W. Lane Bailey, City Manager, City of Salisbury
Mr..Jim Behmer, Utilities Director, City of Salisbury

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884 Renewal Yadkin
FORM
2A NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 MGD must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow >_ 0.1 MGD. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through 6.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
E.
G.
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 MGD,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 MGD,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 2 of 27

A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
Facility Address
(not P.O. Box)
City of Salisbury Wastewater Treatment Plant
1915 Grubb Ferry Road
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
Jim Amaral
Water & Wastewater Plants Operations Manager
[phone]
1915 Grubb Ferry Road
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name
Mailing Address
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
Contact Person Sonia Basinger
Title Environmental Services Manager
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
Z owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
❑ facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NC0023884 PSD
UIC Other Land Application WQ0001956
RCRA Other Stormwater NCG110120
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
*City of Salisbury
47,008
Separate
City of Salisbury
Town of Landis
3,131
Separate
Town of Landis
Town of East Spencer
1,512
Separate
Town of East Spencer
Town of Faith
824
Separate
Town of Faith
Total population served
52,475
Data obtained from NC Office of State Budget and Management (July, 2016)
*Salisbury's population includes:
Salisbury,
Spencer, Rockwell, Granite Quarry and China Grove.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 3 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884 Renewal Yadkin
A.S. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
A.S. .Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12'h month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 12.5 MGD
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate, MGD 8.97 8.29 8.56
C. Maximum daily flow rate, MGD 21.8 22.6 23.9
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer 100
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer %
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
r'
I. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
III. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks).
V. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
C. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
1
None
None
None.
® No
r
MGD
❑ Yes ® No
MGD
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 4 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( 1
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility.
MGD
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection): ❑• Yes
® No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
EPA Form 3510 2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT'ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884 Renewal. Yadkin
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent.is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 MGD."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location City of Salisbury 28144
(City or town, if applicable)
Rowan
(Zip Code)
North Carolina
(County)
(State)
35 degrees 44' 7" N
80 degrees 26' 50" W
(Latitude)
(Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) 535
ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) 9
ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 8.56
MGD
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes
® No (go to A9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number of times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser?
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
® Yes ❑ No
MGD
a. Name of receiving water Yadkin River
b. Name of watershed (if known) Yadkin
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known): 03040103010010
C. Name of State Management/River'Basin (if known): Yadkin River Basin
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known): 03040103
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute 525 (1 B3) cis chronic 639 (4133) cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving, stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 6 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary
❑ Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 85 %
Design SS removal 85 %
Design P removal NA %
Design N removal NA %
Other %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Liquid Chlorination
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ® Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number: 001 (Test results are from October 2015 thru September 2018)
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.1
S.U.
pH (Maximum)
7.8
S.U.
Flow Rate
23.9
MGD
8.606
MGD
1096
Temperature (Winter)
20.4
Deg C
14.0
Deg C
291
Temperature (Summer)
26.1
Deg C
21.8
Deg C
450
' For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
MLJMDL
Number of
METHOD
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
SM 5210 B-2011
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
72.7
mg/1
6.1
mg/1
325
(Hach 10360-
2.0
DEMAND (Report one)
2011)
CBOD5
N/A
FECAL COLIFORM
5700
Col/100 ml
66.8
col/100 ml
317
SM 9222 D-1997
1
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
57.8
F mg/1
14.7
Mg/1
326
SM 2540 D-2011
2.5
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 7 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate >_ 0.1 MGD must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
Approximately 750,000 gallons. This estimate is based on the difference between water production and the WWTP effluent (by applying a
consumptive use correction factor).
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
System -wide flow monitoring to identify high priority areas;
Redzone sewer camera inspections PACP coding and analysis by engineering consultant;
Collection system rehabilitation in progress, including point repairs, CIPP and manhole rehab;
Annual funding for sewer rehab in 10-year CIP
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within''/< mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redundancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
BA. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name: Carolina Technical Services, Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 268
China Grove, NC 28023
Telephone Number: [phone]
Responsibilities of contractor: Quarterly calibration of all wastewater flow meters.
B.S. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.) (Go to B.5. Attachment)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
001
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 8 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
C. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
Begin Construction
End Construction
Begin Discharge
Attain Operational Level
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly:
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall Number: 001 (Test results are from October 2015 thru September 2018)
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT
METHOD
MUMDL
--
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
4.5
mg/I
0.52
mg/I
273
SM 4500 NH3 D-
2011
0.1
CHLORINE (TOTAL
47
ug/1
1.1
ug/I
758
SM 4500 Cl G-
20
RESIDUAL, TRC)
2011
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
12.4
mg/1
7.4
mg/1
758
SM 4500 O G-
1.0
2011
TOTAL KJELDAHL
9.1
mg/I
3.68
mg/I
156
SM 4500 Norg B-
1.0
NITROGEN (TKN)
2011
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
27.0
mg/I
11.22
mg/I
156
EPA 353.2
0.3
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
< 5
mg/I
< 5
mg/I
16
EPA 1664 B
5.0
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
3.9
mg/I
2.27
mg/I
156
SM 4500 P E-
2011
0.01
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
N/A
(TDS)
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
® Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
® Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Mr. W. Lane Bailey, City Manager
Signature
Telephone number [phone]
Date signed 3 /act C
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDEQ/ DWR
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 10 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 MGD and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 MGD or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
ML./MDL
Number
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
of
METHOD
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
1.0
ug/I
0.33
ug/I
3
EPA 200.7
1 to 10
ug/I
EPA 200.7
ARSENIC
< 10
ugll
< 4
3
1 t0 10
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
BERYLLIUM
< 1
< 1
3
1.0
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
CADMIUM
< 2
< 1
3
0.5 to 2
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
CHROMIUM
< 5
< 3.7
3
1 to 5
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
COPPER
22.2
13.2
3
1 to 2
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
LEAD
< 5
< 2.3
3
1 to 5
ng/I
ng/I
EPA 1631 E
MERCURY
10.2
5.9
3
1
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
NICKEL
2
0.67
3
1 to 5
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
SELENIUM
1
0.33
3
1 to 10
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
SILVER
< 5
< 2.3
3
1 to 5
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
THALLIUM
< 5
< 2.3
3
1 to 5
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 200.7
ZINC
48.4
40.7
3
10
ug/I
ug/I
SM 4500
CYANIDE
< 10
< 10
3
CNE 1999
10
TOTAL PHENOLIC
<0.005
mg/I
<0.005
mg/I
3
EPA 420.1
0.005
COMPOUNDS
mg eq
mg
SM2340 C
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
71.8
CacO
70.7
CaoQ
3
1997
1
3/I
3/1
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 11 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXI(VIUM,DAILTDISCHARGE•,
" AVERAGE DAILIt DISCHARGE,
'
POLLUTANT
.,
Alumber,"°ANALYTICAL.
. s
Cpnq."
Units a
�ttass
Units
; ConC. ,
U,nits-"
Ntass
Units
.: of
METHOD e
,L
a
�Sar`�ples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ug/I
ug/I
ACROLEIN
< 100
< 100
3
EPA 624
100
ug/I
ug/I
ACRYLONITRILE
< 100
< 100
3
EPA 624
100
ug/I
ug/I
BENZENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
ug/I
ug/I
BROMOFORM
<10
<10.
3
EPA 624
10
CARBON
< 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
TETRACHLORIDE
ug/I
ug/I
CHLOROBENZENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
CHLORODIBROMO-
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
METHANE
ug/I
ug/I
CHLOROETHANE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
ETHER
ug/1
ug/I
CHLOROFORM
15.1
8.9
3
EPA 624
10
DICHLOROBROMO-
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
METHANE
ug/I
ug/I
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
ug/I
ug/I
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
TRANS-1,2-DICHLORO-
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICH LORD-
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
ETHYLENE
ug/I
ug/I
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
1,3-DICHLORO-
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
PROPYLENE
ug/I
ug/I
ETHYLBENZENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
ug/I
ug/I
METHYL BROMIDE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
ug/I
ug/I
METHYL CHLORIDE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
ug/I
ug/I
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
< 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
ETHYLENE
ug/I
ug/I
TOLUENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 12 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXJIMIJM
DAILYDISCHARGE
AVERAGE DiAftx DIW4,4IRGE `
y
POLLUTANT
'ANALYTICAL
MPMDL`
Dumber ,
p »
�c5nc
units
Mass
; Gonc.'
Units
Mass
Un�is
of
METHOD
aUn>ts
_Samples
< 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2-
< 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 624
10
TRICHLOROETHANE
ug/1
ug/I
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
ug/I
ug/I
VINYL CHLORIDE
<10
<10
3
EPA 624
10
Use this space (or.a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
ug/I
ug/I
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 625
2-CHLOROPHENOL
<10
<10
3
10
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 625
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
<10
<10
3
10
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 625
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
<10
<10
3
10
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 625
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
< 50
< 50
3
50
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 625
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
< 50
< 50
3
50
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 625
2-NITROPHENOL
<10
<10
3
10
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 625
4-NITROPHENOL
< 50
< 50
3
50
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 625
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
< 50
< 50
3
50
ug/I
ugh
EPA 625
PHENOL
< 10
< 10
3
10
2,4,6-
ug/I
ug/I
EPA 625
TRICHLOROPHENOL
<10
<10
3
10
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
�
T
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ug/I
ug/I
ACENAPHTHENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ugll
ug/I
ACENAPHTHYLENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/l
ANTHRACENE
< 10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
BENZIDINE
< 50
< 50
3
EPA 625
50
ug/I
ug/I
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
<10
110
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
BENZO(A)PYRENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 13 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
-z•.w
MAXIMUMDA1L'Y,`DISCHARGE,
`'`
AVERgGE DA1LY
LIISCHARGE.„r' 2°
,
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
MUMDL
Number
,
,.
Unrts
Mass"`
�,Units'
` Conc.
Units :
Mass
Units-
of,
METHOD r .
,
- aropies'
3,4 BENZO-
< 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
FLUORANTHENE
ug/I
ug/I
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
BENZO(K)
< 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
< 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
PROPYL) ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
33.3
ug/I
16.1
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
< 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
PHENYL ETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
< 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
PHENYL ETHER
ug/I
ug/I
CHRYSENE
<10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/l
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
DIBENZO(A,H)
<10
ug/I
<10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
ANTHRACENE
ug/I
ug/I
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
3,3-DICHLORO-
< 20
ug/I
< 20
ug/I
3
EPA 625
20
BENZIDINE
ug/I
ug/I
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ugll
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
ugll
ug/I
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
<10
<10
3
EPA 625
10
1,2-DIPHENYL-
< 50
ug/I
< 50
ug/I
3
EPA 625
50
� HYDRAZINE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 14 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
MUMDL
Number
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
of
METHOD
Samples
ug/I
ug/I
FLUORANTHENE
< 10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/1
ug/I
FLUORENE
< 10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
< 10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
HEXACHLORO-
` 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
` 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
PENTADIENE
ug/I
ug/I
HEXACHLOROETHANE
< 10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
` 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
PYRENE
ug/l
ug/l
ISOPHORONE
< 10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
NAPHTHALENE
< 10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
ug/I
ug/I
NITROBENZENE
< 10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
N-NITROSODI-N-
` 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
` 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
` 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
PHENYLAMINE
ug/I
ug/I
PHENANTHRENE
< 10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
ugll
ug/I
PYRENE
< 10
< 10
3
EPA 625
10
1,2,4-
` 10
ug/I
< 10
ug/I
3
EPA 625
10
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 15 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884 Renewal
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 MGD; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.I. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years. 22
® chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported. (Go to EA Summary)
Test number: Test number: Test number:
a. Test information.
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 16 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test; include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If saltwater, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
wa A
n#
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%
LCso
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Salisbury VVVVfP, NCO023884
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
C25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 27

E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: 09/12/2018 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001: Collection start dates: 09/03/2018, 09/06/2018 ; Testing Date 09/05/2018;
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed -1.09% reduction
Date submitted: 09/18/2018 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 09/03/2018, 09/06/2018, 09/09/2018: Testing Date 09/06/2018;
Test Method -Fathead Minnow, Method 1000.0: Test Results: Passed ChV >10.6%
Date submitted: 06/13/2018 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001: Collection start dates: 06/04/2018, 06/07/2018 ; Testing Date 06/06/2018,
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia, Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 1.10% reduction
Date submitted: 06/15/2018 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001: Collection start dates: 06/04/2018, 06/07/2018, 06/10/2018: Testing Date 06/06/2018:
Test Method -Fathead Minnow, Method 1000.0; Test Results: Passed ChV >10.6%
Date submitted: 03/21/2018 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 03/12/2018, 03/15/2018 ; Testing Date 03/14/2018:
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 0.36% reduction
Date submitted: 03/26/2018 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 03/12/2018, 03/15/2015, 03/18/2018: Testing Date 03/14/2018;
Test Method -Fathead Minnow, Method 1000.0; Test Results: Passed ChV >10.6%
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 27

f
Date submitted: 12/13/2017 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: .(see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 12/04/2017, 12/07/2017 : Testing Date 12/06/2017
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia Method 1002.0: Test Results: Passed 1.81% reduction
Date submitted: 12/15/2017 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 12/04/2017, 12/07/2017, 12/10/2017; Testing Date 12/06/2017
Test Method -Fathead Minnow, Method 1000.00 Test Results: Passed ChV >10.6%
Date submitted: 09/27/2017 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
i
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 09/18/2017, 09/20/2017 ; Testing Date 09/20/2017;
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia Method 1002.0: Test Results: Passed 1.80% reduction
Date submitted: 06/14/2017 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 06/05/2017,.06/07/2017 ; Testing Date 06/07/2017;
r ,
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia,,Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 3.82% reduction
Date submitted: 03/29/2017 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 03/20/2017, 03/22/2017 : Testing Date 03/22/2017;
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia, Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 0.36% reduction
i
Date submitted: 12/14/2016 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
I
Outfall 001: Collection start dates: 12/05/2016, 12/07/2016 ; Testing Date 12/07/2016:
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia, Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 3.26% reduction
Date submitted: 09/21/2016 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001: Collection start dates: 09/12/2016, 09/14/2016 ; Testing Date 09/14/2016;
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia, Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 2.18% reduction
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 20 of 27

IJ }
i�
Date submitted: 06/22/2016 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001: Collection start dates: 06/13/2016, 06/15/2016 ; Testing Date 06/15/2016;
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia Method 1002.0: Test Results: Passed 3.65% reduction
Date submitted: 03/12/2016 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 03/14/2016, 03/16/2016 ; Testing Date 03/16/2016;
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia, Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 3.72% reduction
Date submitted: 12/16/2015 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 12/07/2015, 12/09/2015: Testing Date 12/09/2015:
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia, Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 0.36% reduction
Date submitted: 09/23/2015 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001: Collection start dates: 09/14/2015, 09/16/2015 ; Testing Date 09/16/2015:
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia, Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 2.50% reduction
Date submitted: 06/11/2015 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 06/03/2015, 06/05/2015: Testing Data,06/03/2015;
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia. Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 2.91 % reduction
i
Date submitted: 03/19/2015 (MM/DD/YYYY)
I
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001: Collection start dates: 03/09/2015, 03/11/2015 : Testing Date 03/11/20150
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia, Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed 1.48% reduction
Date submitted: 12/17/2014 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001: Collection start dates: 12/08/2014, 12/10/2014 : Testing Date 12/10/2014;
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia, Method 1002.0: Test Results: Passed 2.21 % reduction
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 21 of 27

Date submitted: 09/19/2014 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001 ; Collection start dates: 09/08/2014, 09/10/2014 ; Testing Date 09/10/2014;
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed-13.06% reduction
Date submitted: 06/19/2014 (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
Outfall 001; Collection start dates: 06/02/2014, 06/04/2014 ; Testing Date 06/04/2014-
Test Method-Ceriodaphnia dubia Method 1002.0; Test Results: Passed -9.28% reduction
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 22 of 27

END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 23 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 5
b. Number of Cl Us. 3
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and provide the
information requested for each SIU. (Additional SIUs attached).
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry (discharge to Grant Creek Treatment Train)
Mailing Address: 485 Cedar Springs Rd
Salisbury, NC 28147
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacture organic chemicals for personal care products. Batch process using reactor vessels.
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Organic chemicals for personal care products.
Raw material(s): SARA Title 312 list
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
181,548 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
Part 414 Subpart H OCPSF
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 24 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 25 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Salisbury WWTP, NCO023884
Renewal
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G. (N/A)
G.1. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
C. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
C. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge point.
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County) (State)
(Latitude) (Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft.
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
❑ Rainfall ❑ CSO pollutant concentrations ❑ CSO frequency
❑ CSO flow volume ❑ Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
G.4. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 26 of 27

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
C. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
G.5. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water:
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management/River Basin:
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
G.6. CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
END OF PART G.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 27 of 27

Additional information, if provided, will appear on the following pages.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

[DAVIDSON COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY l j yq
EFFLUENT TO
/ {
YADKIN RIVER
SLUDGE STORAGE SITE
1
GRANT CREEK FACILITY
LK/
J
/ INFLUENT: GRANT CREEK INTERCEPTOR
l - TITT
S P EI N C E! R))\
7—
SalrS�6aryR�wan
U77LirrE3
GRANT CREEK
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITY
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Legend
—FACILITY BOUNDARY
1 MILE BUFFER
LAND APPLICATION SITES
COUNTYBOUNDARY
& 10 FT CONTOURS
STREAMS
NOTE: THERE IS NO PUBLIC RECORD
OF WELLS, SPRINGS, OR
SURFACE WATER BODIES
N
W E
s
1 inch equals 1,500 feet
0 700 1,400 2,100
Feet
MAP PREPARED 11/28/18
Please note: The information presented on this map is only
approximate and results from the compilation of a variety of
source materials. The source materials have not been
reviewed for accuracy. This map is not a legal description
of property. City of Salisbury and Salisbury -Rowan Utilities
make no representation or warranty concerning the accuracy
of the information presented in this map.

LT
:S - ;N :C'E)R
n�E. A\-S
`. z
�.\Y/.*
EFFLUENT TO
WE
YADKIN RIVER
SLUDGE STORAGE SITE
,P''E; N-C, E R
I
o-
(` J
i1 U
Aso
\\ j `
L<
r
TOWN CREEK FACILITY
INFLUENT. TOWN CREEK INTERCEPTOR
jI HIGH ROCK LAKE l`
L.
� Salisbury-�P�Wan /�l
UIX177ES
TOWN CREEK
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITY
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Legend
FACILITY BOUNDARY
1 MILE BUFFER
LAND APPLICATION SITES
5 & 10 FT CONTOURS
STREAMS
NOTE: THERE IS NO PUBLIC RECORD
OF WELLS, SPRINGS, OR
SURFACE WATER BODIES
1 inch equals 1,500 feet
0 700 1,400 2,100
Feet
MAP PREPARED 11/28/18
Please note: The information presented on this map is only
approximate and results from the compilation of a variety of
source materials. The source materials have not been
reviewed for accuracy. This map is not a legal description
of property. City of Salisbury and Salisbury -Rowan Utilities
make no representation or warranty concerning the accuracy
of the information presented in this map.

G..ANT CREEK WASTE",TER TREATMENT TRt,,N
PIPING BACKUP POWER SUPPLY
�+-► INFLUENT NO BACKUP POWER
► + + ► DRAIN GENERATOR 1
►-►--►-► RAS GENERATOR 2
�+-�-♦ EFFLUENT GENERATOR 3
0-0 0 0 WAS
Design
Treatment Unit
Flow (MGD)
1 Plant Influent
7.5
2 Preliminary Treatment
3.8
3 Main Lift Station Influent/Effluent
7.5
4 Main Lift Station Bypass
0
5 Primary Clarifier Influent
6.9
6 Primary Clarifier Excess
0.6
7 Trickling Filter Influent/Effluent
6.9
8 Manhole No. 4 Influent
14.4
9 Aeration Basin. Influent/Effluent
15
10 Final Clarifier Influent
7.5
11 Final Clarifier Effluent
3.8
12 Chlorine Contact Tank Influent
7.5
13 Effluent Pumping Station Effluent
7.5
14 Final Clarifier (RAS)
3.8
15 Waste Activated Sludge
DIGESTER #2
+* ------
Z
RIMARY SETTLING
BASIN
RIMARY SETTLING
1 BASIN
1
1
1
DIGESTER #3
DIGESTER #4
DIGESTER #1
s--�.—t--T 4) SCREW PUMP STATION
SECONDARY o
CLARIFIER X
1
z
m
9
TRICKLING FILTER 12
D
7 D
\ SECONDARY z
CLARIFIER
TRICKLING FILTER
SECONDARY
�1� CLARIFIER
a�
a.
-a Cl)
�.
r
mCn
co
a
m
LUENT
STATIC
n ks
Feet
0 20 40 80 120 160
Map printed 11 /28/18
0

TUvVN CREEK WASTEW)--xi-ER TREATMENT TRAiN
PIPING BACKUP POWER SUPPLY
►--►-+ INFLUENT NO BACKUP POWER
► ► . ► DRAIN GENERATOR 1
RAS
►-+—►--� E F F L U E N 1
) i 0 0 WAS
Treatment Unit
1 Primary Treatmi
2 Primary Treatmi
3 Main Lift Station
4 Aeration Basin It
5 Final Clarifier Inf
6 Final Clarifier Ef
7 Chlorine Contac
8 Effluent Pump S
9 Effluent Pump S
10 Return Activatec
11 Waste Sludge
Feet
0 20 40 80 120 160
Map printed 11 /28/18

Treati it Unit
1 Parshall Flume
2 Ultraviolet Disinfection
3 Cascade Aeration
Design
Flow (MGD)
40.0
40.0
40.0
GENERATOR
EFFLUENT TO YADKIN RIVER
ULTRAVIOLET
GRANTAND TOWN CREEK EFFLUENTS COMBINED
CASCADE
POST AERATOR
SALISBURY-ROWAN WWTP
YADKIN EFFLUENT (YE)
�. 1 inch = 30 feet
Sal ry�i s W+F
�'""M'-� Map printed 11/28/18 ti

SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Agility Fuel Solutions (discharge to Town Creek Treatment Train)
Mailing Address: 1010 Corporate Center Drive
Salisbury, NC 28146
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacture paint assemble package ship & install compressed natural gas fuel systems
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Compressed natural gas fuel systems for commercial vehicles.
Raw material(s): Aluminum steel sheet stock, stainless steel tubing, powder & liquid paint, and parts wash chemicals (acids/bases).
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
7,518 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: CSP Composites. LLC (discharge to Grant Creek Treatment Train)
Mailing Address: 6701 Statesville Blvd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Infection molding, parts washing, water met cutting, compression molding
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Truck hoods bumpers doors: golf cart bodies: HVAC cabinet components
Raw material(s): Sheet molding compound (styrene and fiberglass), DLFT (resin and glass), paint, soap
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
7,620 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
9,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits M Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Freirich Foods (discharge to Grant Creek Treatment Train)
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1529
Salisbury, NC 28145
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Meat processing: thawing trimming curing, cooking, smoking, chilling, storage, shipping
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Processed beef and pork
Raw material(s): Beef, pork, sugar, sodium phosphate, sodium nitrite, sodium lactate, liquid smoke, spices
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
41,555 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: HBD Industries Inc. (discharge to Town Creek Treatment Train)
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 948
Salisbury, NC 28145
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Mixing compounds to make rubber. Forming and curing rubber into hoses and rubber bands grinding pressure testing washing
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Industrial hose, rubber bands rubber covered rolls
Raw material(s): Polymers carbon blacks plasticizers, vulcanizers, protective waxes, colorants, accelerators
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge'into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
8,021 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Hitachi Metals North Carolina Ltd. (discharge to Grant Creek Treatment Train)
Mailing Address: 1 Hitachi Metals Drive
China Grove NC 28023
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Mixing compounds to form magnetic materials wet forming in a magnetic field sintering grinding
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Ferrite magnets used in the automotive industry
Raw material(s): Ferric oxide strontium carbonate, sulfur dioxide, silica, ammonium bicarbonate, hexavalent chrome lanthanum, cobalt
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
46,645 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
7,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
Part 471 Subpart J Metal Powders
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Innospec Performance Chemicals (discharge to Grant Creek Treatment Train)
Mailing Address: 500 Hinkle Lane
Salisbury, NC 28144
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Batch manufacturing of primarily esterification processes using reactor vessels flaking process of solid soaps
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Surfactants used in soaps shampoos body washes and other personal care products
Raw material(s): (see attached list)
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
37,223 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Thorneburg Hosiery (discharge to Town Creek Treatment Train)
Mailing Address: 319 Link Street
Rockwell, NC 28138
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Wash dye, dry and finish socks
F.5. Principal Product(i) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Sports/ activity specific hosiery products (socks)
Raw material(s): Synthetic fibers and yarn, process waxes, oils, soaps, dyes, softeners, water treating and boiler chemicals
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
32,815 gpd ( continuous or x intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

Sludge Management Plan Narrative
City of Salisbury WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCOO23884
Grant Creek Wastewater Treatment Train's (WWTT) sludge is processed onsite through a 2-
meter belt filter press and stored on an onsite covered sludge pad prior to scheduled land application
events. Town Creek WWTT's sludge is also processed onsite through a 2- meter belt filter press and
stored on an onsite covered sludge pad prior to scheduled land application events. The Water Plant
alum sludge is transported by the City's 5,000 gallon tanker to the Town Creek Treatment Train where it
is processed and stored on Town Creek WWTT's onsite covered sludge pad prior to scheduled land
application events. The sludge at both trains is then land applied by EIVIA Resources, Inc. on permitted
sites in the City's Class B Land Application Program. The permit for this program is WQ0001956 and has
1,005.1 acres permitted. The permit expiration date is November 30, 2022.
Robert Loper
City of Salisbury
Residuals ORC

Sample Location: Yadkin Effluent
Parameter: Silver
10/1 /2015 To 9/30/2018
Please Note: This report lists all results for a specific parameter (regardless of what test or tests they were
performed under) that have been completed within the specified date range. All non numeric data results (< etc..)
are charted as 0.
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
N
N
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
01101 /16 07/01/16 01 /01117 07/01/17
Sample Date
Silver
01/01/18 07/01/18
Sample_ Number
Sampled Date
Calc Result
Reported Result
Qual ri
Unit
150CT21-03-003
10/21/2015
<5
<5
ug/L
15DEC15-03-003
12/15/2015
<5
<5
ug/L
16FEB10-03-003
2/10/2016
<5
<5
ug/L
16MAY11-03-003
5/11/2016
<5
<5
ug/L
16AUG17-03-003
8/17/2016
<5
<5
ug/L
16SEP20-03-003
9/20/2016
<5
<5
ug/L
16NOV16-03-003
11/16/2016
<5
<5
ug/L
17MAR15-03-003
3/15/2017
<1
<1
ug/L
17MAR15-03-003
3/15/2017
ug/L
17J U N 13-03-003
6/13/2017
u9/L
17JUN13-03-003
'6/13/2017
<1
<1
ug/L

17J U N 13-03-003
6/13/2017
ug/L
17JUN21-03-003
6/21/2017
<1
<1
ug/L
17J U N21-03-003
6/21 /2017
ug/L
17SEP27-03-003
9/27/2017
<1
<1
ug/L
17DEC13-03-003
12/13/2017
<1
<1
ug/L
17 D EC 13-03-003
12/13/2017
ug/L
18JAN24-03-003
1/24/2018
<1
<1
ug/L
18JAN24-03-003
1/24/2018
ug/L
18MAR06-03-003
3/6/2018
<1
<1
ug/L
18APR11-03-003
4/11/2018
<1
<1
ug/L
18JUL11-03-003
7/11/2018
<1
<1
ug/L

Calc or: Estimate NPDES Permit Limitations based the Dissolved
Water Quality Standards and Stream & Effluent Hardness
FACILITY: PERMIT #: DATE: CALC BY:
City of Salisbury WWTP NC0023884 9/7/2017 SB
Average Stream Flow
Recelving
Receiving
Rec. Stream
NPDES
Total
Total
IWC - Instream
IWC - Instream
Stream
Stream
Suspended
Hardness
Wastewater
Wastewater
Avera e
a
Upstream
Average Effluent
(CFS)
summer
summer
1Q10
Flow Limit
Solids
(CaCO3,
Concentration
Concentration
Hardness
Hardness
7Q10 CFS
7Q10 MGD
[MGD]
[MGD]
m /L
m /L
(Chronic)
(Acute)
4879.00
735.00
474.1935
382.87
12.50
10.00
26
0.03
0.03
25.00
68.34
Class C, C-NSW, C-Swamp, and B streams
2 3
4
5 6
7 8
Dissolved Water Quality
Criteria (function of total
hardness)
Translators-
using EPA
Default
Partition
Coefficients
(streams)
Total Metal
(allocated to permittee) Diss.
Metal = Translator
Estimated NPDES
Permit Limits [Total
Metal + IWC]
Chronic
Acute
Chronic
Acute
Chronic
Acute
PARAMETER*
[ug/1]
[ug/1] I
[ug/1]
[ug/I]
[ug/1]
[ug/1] .
Arsenic
150''
340
1.000
150
340
5840.32
10754.07
Arsenic (HH / WS)
10i
N/A
1.000
10
N/A
2528.19
N/A
Beryllium
6.5
65
1.000
6.5
65
253.08
2055.92
Cadmium (a)
0.15
0.85
0.252
0.6096
3.3652
23.7
106.44
Chlorides (WS)
250000E
N/A
1.000
250000
N/A
9733871
N/A
Chromium III (a)
25
190
0.202
122.0088
937.956
4750.5
29667.18
Chromium VI
11
16
1.000
11
16
428.3
506.07
Chromium, Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Copper (a)
2.8
3.8
0.348
8.1795
10.9108
318.5
345.10
Cyanide
5.0
22.0
1.000
5.0000
22.0000
194.7
695.85
Flouride
1800.0''
N/A
1.000
1800.0
N/A
70083.9
N/A
Lead (a)
0.57
15
0.184
3.0895
79.2814
120.29
2507.64
Mercury
U12000
N/A
1.000
0.012000
N/A
0.467226
N/A
Molybdenum (WS)
160.00
N/A
1.000
160.0000
N/A
6229.68
N/A
Nickel (a)**
17
150
0.432
38.6290
347.7928
1504
11000.55
Nickel (WS)'
25
N/A
1.000
25.0000
N/A
973
N/A
Selenium
5
56
1.000
5.0000
56.0000
195
1771.26
Silver (a)
0.06
0.32
1.000
0.06
0.3195
2.34
10.10
Zinc(a)
38
38
0.288
131 49861
130.43171
51201
4125.50
Cadmium(trout streams) 1 0.151 0.511 0.2521 0.611 2.021 23.71 63.89
a. Denotes metals for which Aquatic Life Criteria are expressed as a function of total hardness.
*Arsenic has a Human Health standard of 10 ug/L is more stingent than the freshwater standards. The Permit limit
for arsenic would be determined by tatting the Human Health Standard and dividing it by an IWC based on the
mean annual flow of the receiving stream and the permitted plant flow.
IWC = Permitted Flow + (Permitted Flow + mean annual average)
** Nickel has a Water Supply standard of 25 ug/L and in most cases is more stringent than the freshwater standard.
The Permit limit for nickel using the 25 ug/L WS standard would be determined by dividing 25 by an IWC based on
HQW streams
91 10
Estimated NPDES
Permit Limits [Total
Metal _ IWC]
Chronic
_Acute
[ug/1]
[ug/I]
2920.16
5377.03
194.68
N/A
126.54
1027.96
11.91
53.22
4866936.5
N/A
2375.2
14833.59
214.1
253.04
N/A
N/A
159.2
172.55
97.3
347.93
35041.9
N/A
60.15
1253.82
0.2336129
N/A
3114.84
N/A
752
5500.28
487
N/A
97
885.63
1.17
5.05
25601
2062.75
11.871 31.94

Summary of Proposed Improvements to the
Grant Creek Wastewater Treatment Train (WWTT)
The improvements to the WWTT that are recommended to treat the estimated flows are summarized
below:
Construction of a new 24 mgd influent screening facility with two multi -rake mechanical bar
screening channels with Y2-inch screen opening size and a third manual coarse bar rack for an
emergency condition bypass option. The final design will include a bid alternate to install a
third mechanical bar screen in place of the manual bar rack. Each channel will be equipped
with two motor operated slide gates to be able to designate which channel(s) are active. Each
mechanical screen will be equipped with a washer compactor on wheels that will be capable of
conditioning screening associated with 24 mgd of flow. The washer compactors discharge
chutes will empty into a dumpster.
Construction of a new 24 mgd influent pump station with one wet well, four submersible
variable speed pumps and a valve vault. The wetwell will share a common wall with the
influent screening structure. The flow will be pumped to the grit removal facility via two 24-
inch force mains. Each force main will have a control valve so that flow can be isolated to one of
the force mains if necessary. Each force main will also be equipped with an 18-inch magnetic
flow meter at the influent to the grit removal facility to measure total influent flow to the plant.
Construction of a new 24 mgd grit removal facility with two 12-foot diameter mechanically -
induced concrete vortex grit removal units. Each vortex grit unit will be equipped with a grit
pump and grit classifier unit. The grit classifiers will be placed on the elevated slab to meet the
minimum head requirements of the grit pumps. The classified grit will be sent to one of two
dumpsters at the grit removal facility. The degritted effluent flow can be sent to the primary
clarifiers or directly to the equalization facility. A maximum of 7.5 mgd will be sent to the
primary clarifiers from the grit removal facility. There will be an option to bypass the primary
clarifiers and to send the full 24 mgd of degritted flow directly to the equalization facility. Each
pipe leaving the grit removal structure will be equipped with a valve and a magnetic flow meter
to control where the flow is being sent.
Conversion of the two existing trickling filters into equalization basins that will have the ability
to accept screened and degritted flow from the grit removal facility and the primary clarifiers.
The conversion of the trickling filters will provide both diurnal and wet weather equalization
storage. A 74-foot diameter inner tank, with water bearing walls and an independent
foundation, will be constructed inside of each of the existing trickling filters. The inner tanks
will each provide the diurnal flow equalization storage of 0.17 million gallons. The remaining
part of the tank will be dedicated to wet weather storage. There will be a weir on top of the
inner tank wall so that flow in excess of 0.17 million gallons will spill over the weir into wet
weather storage. The diurnal storage portion of each tank will contain a large bubble mixing
system to keep the solids in suspension, however alternate mixing systems may be considered
further during final design. The tank will have an operator walkway to the inner tank for
maintenance purposes. The equalization facility effluent flow will drain by gravity through
existing piping to the aeration basin.

Construction of a new return activated sludge (RAS) and waste activated sludge (WAS) pump
station. The pump station will consist of one wet well, three variable speed RAS pumps with a
total pumping capacity of 6 mgd, and two variable speed WAS pumps. The RAS force mains will
discharge into an existing manhole upstream of the aeration basin where RAS flow will continue
by gravity through existing piping to the aeration basin. The WAS force main will discharge to
the digester complex. New modulating valves and level indicators will be installed at the
existing RAS Parshall flumes to be able to better control the wasting rate out of each secondary
clarifier.
• Yard piping improvements to alleviate hydraulic bottlenecks downstream of the trickling
filters/equalization basins to allow for a peak flow downstream of flow equalization of 18.75
mgd base flow and 6 mgd of RAS flow.
■ New field instruments and controls will be provided for all process areas affected during
construction.
• The upgrades described above are anticipated to add approximately 1330 horsepower of new
connected motor loads plus additional process and building loads, resulting in a total estimated
1500 kVA of additional connected new loads, for an overall estimated connected load of 3000
kVA.
■ Construction of two new electrical buildings. Electrical Building 1 will be located south of the
proposed influent screening and influent pumping facility. Electrical building 2 will be located
east of the proposed RAS/WAS pump station.
• Addition of a new 1750 kW standby generator.
• Plant improvements to achieve future nutrient limits are summarized in this report but are not
anticipated to be constructed until required by state regulations.

Grant Creek WWTT Improvements Construction Schedule
Based on equipment submittal and delivery times quoted by manufacturers, the longest
lead time item for this project is the multi -rake bar screen at 36 weeks from the time the
order is placed by the contractor until the equipment is delivered to the site. Most of the
required grading, concrete and electrical work can be completed by the contractor prior
to receiving the equipment; therefore, CDM Smith estimates that the Grant Creek WWTT
improvements can be substantially complete within 16 months of notice to proceed. Final
completion is estimated to take 2 additional months making the project construction
duration 550 calendar days (or 400 working days). The anticipated design, permitting,
bidding and construction schedule is shown in Figure 13-1. Once preliminary design has
been completed, final design and permitting are scheduled to be accomplished within 8
months (if the nutrient removal facilities are not included in the final design), while
bidding and award are anticipated to be completed within approximately 3 months.
Based on this schedule, construction is estimated to be completed in the second quarter
of 2021.

SRU Grant Creek wwTr Improvememb
Project Schedule
ID
Task Name
Duration
17
1 2018
2019
2020
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
1 Qtr 11 Qtr 2 1 Qtr 3 1 Qtr 4
Qtr 11 Qtr 2 1 Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Qtr 11 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4
Qtr 1
1
Preliminary Design
Geotechnical Investigations
124 days
30 days
Preliminary
Design
Geatechnici I Investigations
2
3
Surveying
Final Design
60% Design and Reviews
30 days
200 days
90 days
Su eying
Final Design
60% Design and Reviews
4
5
11
90% Design and Reviews
60 days
9096 JDesin Reviews
16
Permitting
60 days
Permitting
17
i
Prepare Final Bidding
50 days
Prepare Final Biddhig Documents
Documents
J
18
Bidding and Award
60 days
Biddi and Award
19
I
Construction
550 days
Construction
Task
PrnleGi SumM1Sary
- tnerrha MlWsr4ne Mhh4a15ur wV He4up ®
Da MWw &
so,t I.......
Extanel Tm44
_,. ;. tnectie su—vy 1 -- 1 Manual sump Y ii
{rruc*
AHlestone +i
Eelernal Mrestanc
Cs Ma nTask llm�ll sbet-Mly C
Cr"Ir.9 split ......
5umarV ��
Inactwe Task
i>ura7ta .ftft - FNkhdnly 7
Progrens
.Z roars vwd 4Jt1/18
Figure 13-1 Project Schedule

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO023884 Month September
Outfall 001 Year 2016
cility Name City of Salisbury WWTP ORC James J. Amaral
Ate of sampling 09/20/2016 Phone [phone]
Analytical Laboratory Meritech # 165, Grant Creek Lab # 112, R&,A Lab # 34
.�5 ..✓ik�L�w-°t=�..a"�c"iS.K;��"�+tY:"�-hY'%iate�iiS��..+._.�-'-''..aa
e
A�.,.J.:'.,f„�ydu��;txs
£"dw�9aSn... �.@5.
�+. �2k.'"A
�tt-.':+�-fr.`!.a:':;
.�j� '� � vfie*�-Sul
.. -1 1' ,�, l''.�p
4 Me�hod���
,":,..w �'..�r:sy
�tia=i�1.aU1��2
3 p .1`s=r:" p
� ��
�'�5t. ��t`?.,*�T`v��k.?'
�Z suite �
>"� �a'::':55'..i.��aiA?s"i'P.i':Cwa'��ixss
;£'1l�eas�ar��uea�.t
w't�7,�:�.,i: �
Ammonia (as N)
C0610
Composite
SM 4500 NH3D 1997
0.1
0.32
mg/L
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
50060
Grab
SM 4500 Cl G 2000
20
< 20
ug/L
Dissolved Oxygen
00300
Grab
SM 4500 OG 2001
1.0
7.3
mg/L
Nitrite plus Nitrate Total (as N)
00630
Composite
SM 4500 NO3E 2000
0.05
11.8
mg/L
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
00625
Composite
(SM 4500 NH3 C 1997)
1.0
4.3
mg/L
Oil and Grease
00556
Grab
EPA 1664A
5.0
< 5.0
mg/L
Total Phosphorus
C0665
Composite
SM 4500 PE 1999
0.01
3.5
mg/L
Total Dissolved Solids
70295
Composite
SM 2540 C 1997
25
653
mg/L
Hardness
00900
Composite
SM 2340 C 1997
1.0
71.4
mg eq CaCO3/L
i:;s.s y, 4 •,.- 'sr"1 1. h s".,.7.
Metalstt4i�e��'rQ�TaMei(A�t�ay�fddi;L
xu ,,
i3`yr 9 2h z k x "' S..'3*'t
'4a.3, k 5 yl t
§r - Sy'p"''
+x'i*-n.ST'4sa Y'p'`yY
Antimony
01097
Composite
EPA 200.7
10
< 10
ug/L
Arsenic
01002
Composite
EPA 200.7
10
< 10
ug/L
Beryllium
01012
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1.0
ug/ L
Cadmium
01027
Composite
EPA 200.7
2.0
< 2.0
ug/L
Chromium
01034
Composite
EPA 200.7
5.0
< 5.0
ug/L
pper
01042
Composite
EPA 200.7
2.0
22.2
ug/ L
Lead
01051
Composite
EPA 200.7
5.0
< 5.0
ug/L
Mercury (Method 1631E)
COMER
Composite
EPA 1631
1.0
10.2
ng/L
Nickel
01067
Composite
EPA 200.7
5.0
< 5.0
ug/ L
Selenium
01147
Composite
EPA 200.7
10
< 10
ug/L
Silver
01077
Composite
EPA 200.7
5.0
< 5.0
ug/ L
Thallium
01059
Composite
EPA 200.7
5.0
< 5.0
ug/L
Zinc
01092
Composite
EPA 200.7
10
48.4
ug/L
Cyanide
00720
Grab
SM 4500 CNE 1999
10
< 10
ug/L
Total phenolic compounds
32730
Grab
EPA 420.1
0.005
< 0.005
mg/L
a
K�.#ric;."
Acrolein
34210
Grab
EPA 624
100g<
100
ug/L
Acrylonitrile
34215
Grab
EPA 624
100,
< 100
ug/L
Benzene
34030
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Bromoform
32104
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
32102
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Chlorobenzene
34301
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Chlorodibromomethane
34306
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Chloroethane
85811
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
2-chloroethy1 vinyl ether
34576
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Chloroform
32106
Grab
EPA 624
10
11.6
ug/ L
hlorobromomethane
32101
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
�,,-dichloroethane
34496
Grab
EPA 624-
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2-dichloroethane
32103
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
34546 1
Grab
EPA 624
10
<10
ug/L
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 1

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO023884 Month September
Outfall 001 Year 2016
v`." 3 r%'^*•n`�„ry ' '" .'F � t�'_ �'"'A'
t:n r,'xn �.. ''S
�j . n �F.Sa � fix°
a 'F""" 't' �+.e` a.,�:,:`v '4
x�-F rL�f;T'�',5"r-5>e�l'+rr�'"�
.?)�"de?.0 }1''t{` 'kr�
�,1�^rr'""4YR �k»;`' J.^i� i
-dichloroethylene
34501
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2-dichloropropane
34541
Grab'
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,3-dichloropropylene
77163
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Ethylbenzene
34371
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Methyl Bromide
34413
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Methyl Chloride
34418
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Methylene Chloride
34423
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
81549
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
34475
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Toluene
34010
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
34506
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,1,2-trichloroethane
34511
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Trichloroethylene
39180
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Vinyl Chloride
39175
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Acicflmerctblccoruaais
Q°;.
.::.fi s�
i k ._
,A+dd
a�¢
a
P-chloro-m-creso
34452
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
2-chlorophenol
34586
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4-dichlorophenol
34601
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4-dimethylphenol
34606
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
34657
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
-dinitrophenol
34616
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Litrophenol
34591
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
4-nitrophenol
34646
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Pentachlorophenol
39032
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Phenol
34694
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
34621
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10.
ug/L
p,.mom+ -"T4' ,.- #'
4. �i�i5+ ,. ''Y +q'
� h �''•#3y -'S 7,^. �,'°'.Y
& �. �%i� i+s h n�
t '}Y Fes" 4
H.x`':� �.. w��
Acenaphthene
34205
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Acenaphthylene
34200
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Anthracene
CO220
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzidine
39120
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Benzo(a)anthracene
34526
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene
34247
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
3,4 benzofluoranthene
34230
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzo(ghi)perylene
34521
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
34242
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
34278
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
34273
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
34283
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
39100
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
34636
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
.yl benzyl phthalate
34292
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
hloronaphthalene
34581
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
34641
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Chrysene
34320 1
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 2

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO023884 Month September
Outfall 001 Year 2016
.+-33 "S •-... "- .+`
4 a `
LA.{-
'°"'sF
Tgramieter,
c w"w — K Z
, Sam sle
..�
":4•U' ..:rtN�'Mf�i
Analy tical = 8
4t�t$t�
;saa� "e
la
+k
„ul•�
�•.N..�•����i;'p}�e�"
r: r,,,.
s' of.
n-butyl phthalate
39110
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Di-n-octyl phthalate
34596
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
34556
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2-dichlorobenzene
34536
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,3-dichlorobenzene
34566
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,4-dichlorobenzene
34571
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
34631
Composite
EPA 625
20
< 20
ug/L
Diethyl phthalate
34336
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Dimethyl phthalate
34341
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4-dinitrotoluene
34611
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,6-dinitrotoluene
C0626
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
I;2-diphenylhydrazine
34346
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Fluoranthene
C0376
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Fluorene
34381
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene
C0700
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
39702
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
34386
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Hexachloroethane
34396
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
34403
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Isophorone
34408
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
phthalene
34696
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
robenzene
34447
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
34428
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10.
ug/L
N-nitrosodimethylamine
34438
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
34433
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Phenanthrene
34461
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Pyrene
34469
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
richlorobenzene
34551
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Sonja Basinger
Authorized Rep entative name
Signatle —" 0
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3

Annual Monitoring and. Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO023884 Month June
Outfall 001 Year 2017
,ility Name City of Salisbury WWTP ORC James J. Amaral
mate of sampling 06 / 13 /2017 Phone [phone]
Analytical Laboratory Meritech # 165, Grant Creek Lab # 112, R&A Lab # 34
a ,xT°i') 3E S �f G { j $,�y` Y zt'i3ti'
Pa �aeter{
aia$Yiet�ir
fC�se.
17a Aei
is. �
F.geF
:Sx,32U
fS3 1 5.k
Analyticalr�-
�TeiiPdae
4<sB"".ii `2
€'>+-
-�Quaa�i�ation�
�0y.3u111+Ieane_axt;
na..uns.aa:"a7ra
Ammonia (as N)
C06.10
Composite
SM 4500 NH31) 1997
0.1
0.39
mg/ L
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
50060
Grab
SM 4500 Cl G 2000
20
< 20
ug/L
Dissolved Oxygen
00300
Grab
SM 4500 OG 2001
1.0
6.8
mg/L
Nitrite plus Nitrate Total (as N)
00630
Composite
SM 4500 NO3E 2000
0.05
21.4
mg/L
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
00625
Composite
(SM 4500 NH3 C 1997)
1.0
3.6
mg/L
Oil and Grease
00556
Grab
EPA 1664A
5.0
< 5
mg/L
Total Phosphorus
C0665
Composite
SM 4500 PE 1999
0.01
2.0
mg/L
Total Dissolved Solids
70295
Composite
SM 2540 C 1997
25
501
mg/L
Hardness
00900
Composite
SM 2340 C 1997
1.0
71.8
mg eq CaCO3/L
"'xr 'Sf.
�? �'
��c�ty.-p��1...�"�'N.L�1R;S.
_:7
'a��^✓•,.*- �
Antimony
01.097
Composite
EPA 200.7
10
< 10
ug/ L
Arsenic
01002
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/ L
Beryllium
01012
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
Cadmium
01027
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.5
< 0.5
ug/ L
Chromium
01034
Composite
EPA 200.7
5.0
< 5
ug/L
,)per
01042
Composite
EPA 200.7
2.0
11.4
ug/ L
Lead
01051
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
Mercury (Method 1631E)
COMER
Composite
EPA 1631
1.0
4.12
ng/L
Nickel
01067
Composite
EPA 200.7
5.0
< 5
ug/L
Selenium
01147
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
Silver
01077
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
Thallium
01059
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
Zinc
01092
Composite
EPA 200.7
10
38.6
ug/L
Cyanide
00720
Grab
SM 4500 CNE 1999
10
< 10
ug/ L
Total phenolic compounds
32730
Grab
EPA 420.1
0.005
< 0.005
mg/L
1
K
Acrolein
34210
Grab
EPA 624
100
< 100
ug/ L
Acrylonitrile
34215
Grab
EPA 624
100
< 100
ug/L
Benzene
34030
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Bromoform
32104
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Carbon Tetrachloride
32102
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Chlorobenzene
34301
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
34306
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Chloroethane
85811
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
2-ciiloroethyl vinyl ether
34576
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Chloroform
32106
Grab
EPA 624
10
15.1
ug/ L
Uorobromomethane
32101
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
1,1-dichloroethane
34496
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2-dichloroethane
32103
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
34546
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 1

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO023884 Month June
Outfall 001 Year 2017
7 :PaameteT
aE�leteT ge rR
Code
Same=
PTYFeMetlOSl°vei
a AnalptYcalt�t°
��eSllltz��a5UYB2ifleilt
10
V5
< 10
ug/L
dichloroethylene
34501
Grab
EPA 624
1,2-dichloropropane
34541
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,3-dichloropropylene
77163
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Ethylbenzene
34371
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Methyl Bromide
34413
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Methyl Chloride
34418
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Methylene Chloride
34423
Grab
EPA 624
10
<. 10
ug/L
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
81549
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
34475
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Toluene
34010
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
34506
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,1,2-trichloroethane
34511
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Trichloroethylene
39180
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Vinyl Chloride
39175
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
.�C''4iraClt. �i�.i',M, C&$1 .Oe&°1L(�,S''
?"yl,.yy,..,,;5„rta:x urns ��a'�3h;.IdSR'.,u�.,;r. w. •aw`sa:._i;s �C.fio�".M".'"eH.W`��'"�aE'&t'v,�
", '
-"tw.t F
.?.,,,;,.yf^'ra..,.Ts-.x,.. `a
,.j, ;" ,. ,, ". ,'`ass-'%
2
,? y :,.sy
AM
`.>s a"4'"';�,•-'_.;.
P-chloro-m-creso
34452
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2-chlorophenol
34586
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4-dichlorophenol
34601
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4-dimethylphenol
34606
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
34657
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
-dinitrophenol
34616
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
_-iitrophenol
34591
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
4-nitrophenol
34646
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Pentachlorophenol
39032
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Phenol "
34694
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
34621
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
teaseeutralccsxup,oumcds
r
Acenaphthene
34205
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Acenaphthylene
34200
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Anthracene
CO220
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzidine
39120
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L.
Benzo(a)anthracene
34526
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene
34247
Composite-
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
3,4 benzofluoranthene
34230
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzo(ghi)perylene
34521
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
34242
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
34278
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
34273
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
34283
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
39100
Composite
EPA 625
10
33.3
ug/L
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
34636
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
yl benzyl phthalate
34292
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
_ _-iloronaphthalene
34581
Composite
EPA 625.
10
< 10
ug/L
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
34641
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Chrysene
34320
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 2

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO023884 Month June
Outfall 001 Year 2017
Pa�rete
Samplg�3�
�.�AlYatlyt ca1,���r
.� Qua�i4ita�ion; '�
°,�AT�tple
units of�;���
-n-butyl phthalate
39110
Composite
EPA 625 y
10
< 10
ug/L
Di-n-octyl phthalate
34596
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
34556
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2-dichlorobenzene
34536
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,3-dichlorobenzene
34566
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,4-dichlorobenzene
34571
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
34631
Composite
EPA 625
20
< 20
ug/L
Diethyl phthalate
34336
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Dimethyl phthalate
34341
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
2,4-dinitrotoluene
34611
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,6-dinitrotoluene
C0626
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
34346
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Fluoranthene
C0376
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Fluorene
34381
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Hexachlorobenzene
C0700
Composite.
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Hexachlorobutadiene
39702
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
34386
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Hexachloroethane
34396
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
34403
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Isophorone
34408
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
phthalene
34696
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
robenzene
34447
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
34428
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
N-nitrosodimethylamme
34438
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
34433
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Phenanthrene
34461
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Pyrene
34469
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
34551
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Sonia Basinger
Authorized Rep e entative name
e Signat 0
(0 -* 2S �2y 1
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO023884 Month March
Outfall 001 Year 2018
;ility Name City of Salisbury WWTP ORC Robert Loper
.ate of sampling March 6, 2018 Phone [phone]
Analytical Laboratory Meritech # 165, Grant Creek Lab # 112, R&A Lab # 34
r� Y..k e. _
.$'-;`+5#e'13x,''" P4,J %.+' 1 t' -1+"f •.'�
raaneter
g 4
;,w,cYxt$ia"{. -Fkt ,m"? ., r,;..4a"-i[..'x.. `e.5i a`''�..isNQMk`. ,.
_�,
ashmeter.:
!e &
n'9y �9�,f''�i°,`C i.
C®de
,+5c,r. ,fir�
'°. a
Sa7mp elk
x
irSG",y Ey
{P eh
ui'r;tJ ev
r� x n;
.,.xalptical
tr{' a. y `
r 1Vtetho
R
.z..''%xa'fJ.,..d:..s`Yu+..�,
SM 4500 NH3D 1997
t3 1l3ritit3 0i1�., ,3
§ i �nel •:,
0.1
e~San Rle
7.V }..� ¢;xi ,+'
$i913.•^
. esult
,
0.27
�Tna�s�ot
E; -t # s ,•'#.
Measuaemeat
mg/L
Ammonia (as N)
C0610
Composite
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
50060
Grab
SM 4500 Cl G 2000
20
< 20
ug/L
Dissolved Oxygen
00300
Grab
SM 4500 oG 2001
1.0
9.4
mg/L
Nitrite plus Nitrate Total (as N)
00630
Composite
SM 4500 NO3E 2000
0.3
12.1
mg/L
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
00625
Composite
(SM 4500 NH3 C 1997)
1.0
4.5
mg/L
Oil and Grease
00556
Grab
EPA 1664A
5.0
< 5
mg/L
Total Phosphorus
C0665
Composite
SM 4500 PE 1999
0.01
1.6
mg/L
Total Dissolved Solids
70295
Composite
SM 2540 C 1997
25
459
mg/L
Hardness
00900
Composite
SM 2340 C 1997
1.0
69
mg eq CaCO3/L
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide
and total phenols
Antimony
01097
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
1
ug/ L
Arsenic
01002
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/ L
Beryllium
01012
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
Cadmium
01027
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.5
< 0.5
ug/L
Chromium
01034
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
pper
01042
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
6
ug/ L
Lead
01051
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
Mercury (Method 1631E)
COMER
Composite
EPA 1631
1.0
3.29
ng/L
Nickel
01067
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
2
ug/L
Selenium
01147
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
1
ug/ L
Silver
01077
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
Thallium
01059
Composite
-EPA 200.7
1.0
< 1
ug/L
Zinc
01092
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
35
ug/L
Cyanide
00720
Grab
SM 4500 CNE 1999
10
< 10
ug/ L
Total phenolic compounds
32730
Grab
EPA 420.1
0.005
< 0.005
mg/L
iTolateorgQy Laic case oaads����
w.Y4. P,2".s nt ..nk1�Y b. °M1 ku1G. .k�<M 6r1.-`&:dr.✓
.zt'
�b„ it, '.�'I�wr zz.
k
+.'r..r iss%JS°�.. x'r.G�w„w $..�
r y {�>,
XfsY: +�i .. 4.Ee 3.s.k .t „ R+
»w&.: �-2. iP 2'S.
f
�N�.�W''
Acrolein
34210
Grab
EPA 624
100
< 100
ug/ L
Acrylonitrile
34215
Grab
EPA 624
100
< 100
ug/ L
Benzene
34030
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Bromoform
32104
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Carbon Tetrachloride
32102
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
34301
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
34306
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Chloroethane
85811
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
34576
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Chloroform
32106
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
hlorobromomethane
32101
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
f,i-dichloroethane
34496
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2-dichloroethane
32103
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
34546
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 1

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO023884 Month March
Outfall 001 Year 2018
x _
''�' y� a ,%
amr'et'`ate:r:r�7. mr",� . �,`,�..,�� .�• � � ':�1,
rameter
"a'-X'° x .r{ ,�'Azt�
�$.4w,.0h£ o.`-d'+teom FF>.,«�,q
k 4 Sample
�i��4, azm°S.,:.'k?S''�1P3 •✓,^-
.
Analytical:
r>•.,9k1v_
t Quaaaati
• ,
apl
�Untof
*�`,x`•
{ dichloroethylene
34501
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
1,2-dichloropropane
34541
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,3-dichloropropylene
77163
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Ethylbenzene
34371
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Methyl Bromide
34413
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Methyl Chloride
34418
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Methylene Chloride
34423
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
81549
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
34475
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Toluene
34010
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
34506
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
1,1,2-trichloroethane
34511
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/L
Trichloroethylene
39180
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
Vinyl Chloride
39175
Grab
EPA 624
10
< 10
ug/ L
? 's; �; fi a-"'' Cw.,' `,a',: '�,3.:nt'�«" ys.
t+u ..,..::,4'..'Ysw'Feci�,x`su-9.S}`"t:'fF.i..'iZ.-?✓:$e'. ,1�rrc'htG
�`5�} ",.-,�
.,,+�.+....=<k..,»s.a�,i�•:v4.%,._o....x
- ^"i �`'k
.. �n.�.`s1aL'.'eR+a_..�
}'.C� •fRr
�. .�_ «'z"t.......i:�.'Jit..
'x" ". 5 ''3 3,€.. �
S. rj�'v
� �N _; .., � �i: 7 �£�. ".2 .R, :� �S' k.,:
.i�,.i.�., akx.. e � EY,' .v.� `6
P-chloro-m-creso
34452
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
2-chlorophenol
34586
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4-dichlorophenol
34601
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4-dimethylphenol
34606
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
34657
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
-dinitrophenol
34616
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
--iitrophenol
34591
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
4-nitrophenol
34646
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Pentachlorophenol
39032
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Phenol
34694
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
34621
Composite
EPA 625
10 .
< 10
ug/L
Y'�•?,''�+'
i-i,...:.
.F:
r „'yhu., •yh'�y�...i?
r
, :"t�'`. .4^• h. 'R
�_.''(�Ii
a. .�•,.....>r>,n.,.
Acenaphthene
34205
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Acenaphthylene
34200
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Anthracene
CO220
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Benzidine
39120
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Benzo(a)anthracene
34526
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene
34247
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
3,4 benzofluoranthene
34230
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzo(ghi)perylene
34521
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
34242
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
34278
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
34273
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
34283
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
39100
Composite
EPA 625
10
14.9
ug/L
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
34636
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
yl benzyl phthalate
34292
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
-.iloronaphthalene
34581
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug L
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
34641
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Chrysene
34320
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 2

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO023884 Month March
Outfall 001 Year 2018
WAR ,l,� i'sParsxeer
axn #.z. k+''��..t�n.•_�xi^z�� #'^,�T Z
.++ - y;%h+d �r.,'n i..i.#��� k:'L.� .aT_ rrK.
� s t.";�'Srr
.1".is �:.A.r°+�.f �:
.' Saasx le
::.� f ra �.s F
'� ..`"i'.ai. t':.t
Anal tical'iato�.:Samp1
w s f �( „ .a*�t'
�`^st.w � a iwx €4 �+.
'� c u'' e�M'
_ •..y:4f° :u?,S�9Sr
i` �a,, •A. _. #
sJ
Uat?itsc�fs�
d,.,. fk.�wA��';zx'S s,
^F s"Fin
,�.-n-butyl phthalate
39110
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Di-n-octyl phthalate
34596
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
34556
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2-dichlorobenzene
34536
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,3-dichlorobenzene
34566
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,4-dichlorobenzene
34571
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
34631
Composite
EPA 625
20
< 20
ug/L
Diethyl phthalate
34336
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Dimethyl phthalate
34341
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,4-dinitrotoluene
34611
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
2,6-dinitrotoluene
C0626
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
34346
Composite
EPA 625
50
< 50
ug/L
Fluoranthene
C0376
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Fluorene
34381
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene
C0700
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
39702
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
34386
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Hexachloroethane
34396
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
34403
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Isophorone
34408
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
�.)hthalene
34696
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
�sobenzene
34447
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
34428
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
N-nitrosodimethylamine
34438
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
34433
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
Phenanthrene
34461
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/ L
Pyrene
34469
Composite
EPA 625
10
< 10
ug/L
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
34551
Composite
EPA 625_
10
< 10
ug/L.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Sonia Basinger
Authorized Reppsentative name
Signaty}`e Q
/04 l2.3 /20)8
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3