The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0083933_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20151207 (2)Water Resources ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY December 7.2015 Aqua North Carolina, Inc. Attn: Thomas J. Roberts, President 202 Mackenan Court Cary, NC 27511 SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspections Mikkola Downs Subdivision WWTP, NC0067091; Greystone Subdivision, NC0078115; and, Salem Quarters WWTP, NCO083933 Permittee: Aqua North Carolina, Inc. Forsyth County Dear Mr. Roberts, PAT MCCRORY DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Secretary S. JAY ZIMMERMAN Director Ron Boone of the Winston Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR or the Division) conducted compliance evaluation inspections of the Mikkola Downs Wastewater Treatment Plant, the Greystone Subdivision, and the Salem Quarters Wastewater Treatment Plant, on December 1, 2015. The assistance and cooperation of Morgan Turner, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC), was greatly appreciated. Inspection reports are attached for your records and inspection findings are summarized below. Mikkola Downs Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO067091 General Information The Mikkola Downs Wastewater Treatment Plant is located near 2777 Stable Hill Trail in Kernersville, Forsyth County, North Carolina, at approximate coordinates 36.182120' West, 80.0538330 North. Aqua NC is authorized to operate this 0.072 million -gallon -per -day (MGD) wastewater treatment plant, which consists of a flow splitter box, bar screen, dual aeration tanks, dual blowers, dual clarifiers, sludge holding tank, Sanuril tablet chlorinator, chlorine contact tank, dechlorination, post aeration tank, and an effluent flow recorder, and discharge treated effluent from outfall 001 of said treatment works, which is located approximately 150 feet southwest of the treatment works at approximate coordinates 36.182526e West, 80.054143e North, to East Belews Creek, which is currently classified as Class C waters and is located in the Roanoke River Basin. Site Review Mr. Boone reviewed the entire plant with Mr. Turner. No discrepancies or violations were noted. The plant appears to be well operated and maintained. Documentation Review Mr. Turner had all required documentation for the inspection and everything was complete and current. This included discharge monitoring reports, chains of custody, laboratory records, calibration records, operator visitation records, and operation & maintenance logs. No discrepancies or violations were noted. Mr. Turner has done an excellent job of documenting his operation and maintenance of the plant. State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 1 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105 336 776 9800 Grevstone Subdivision Wastewater Treatment Plant. NCO078115 General Information The Greystone Subdivision Wastewater Treatment Plant is located off the north end of Pine Creek Road in Kernersville, Forsyth County, North Carolina, at approximate coordinates 36.1676620, 80.086436°. Aqua North Carolina, Inc is authorized to operate this 0.032 million -gallon -per -day (MGD) wastewater treatment plant, which consists of a bar screen, an influent pump station, an equalization basin, dual extended aeration basins and clarifiers, a sludge digester, tablet chlorination and dechlorination, and a flow meter, and discharge treated effluent from outfall 001 of said treatment works, which is located approximately 25 feet east of the treatment works at approximate coordinates 36.1676700, 80.086130°, to Belews Creek, which is currently classified as Class C waters and is located in the Roanoke River Basin. Site Review Mr. Boone reviewed the entire plant with Mr. Turner. No discrepancies or violations were noted. The plant appears to be well operated and maintained. Documentation Review Mr. Turner had all required documentation for the inspection and everything was complete and current. This included discharge monitoring reports, chains of custody, laboratory records, calibration records, operator visitation records, and operation & maintenance logs. No discrepancies or violations were noted. Mr. Turner has done an excellent job of documenting his operation and maintenance of the plant. Salem Quarters Wastewater Treatment Plant. NCO083933 General Information The WWTP is located inside the Salem Quarters subdivision in Winston Salem, Forsyth County, NC, at approximately coordinates 36.191667N, 80.109722W. The permit authorizes Aqua North Carolina Inc. to operate this 0.06 MGD WWTP, which consists of a bar screen, a flow splitter box, an equalization basin, dual aeration basins, dual clarifiers, a sand filter, an ultraviolet disinfection system, backup chlorination, contact and dechlorination system, a sludge holding tank, and standby power, and discharge the treated effluent via outfall 001 into an unnamed tributary (UT) to Belews Creek, this section of which is currently classified as Class C waters in the Roanoke River basin. Site Review Mr. Turner has done a good job operating and maintaining the plant. The only problem noted during the inspection was the presence of excessive sludge solids in the weir troughs on the effluent side of the clarifiers. It is unknown at this point what is causing the solids to accumulate in the troughs but Mr. Turner is preventing the solids from being discharged and plans to bring the effluent filters on line to filter out the solids. It is unknown when the filters will be brought on line. Mr. Boone noted no discrepancies. Documentation Review All documentation was reviewed. No discrepancixes were found. Mr. Turner has done an excellent job of documenting the operation and maintenance of the plant as required by the permit. This includes operations and visitation logs, discharge monitoring reports and laboratory and field laboratory records, chains of custody, etc. Mr. Boone noted no concerns during any of these inspections. If you have any questions regarding the inspections or this letter, please call him or me at (336) 776-9800. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Sherri V. Knight Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Division of Water Resources Attachments: 1. BIMS Inspection Report CC: WSRO-SWP Central Files NPDES Unit Aqua North Carolina, Inc. Attn: Dave McDaniel 152B Furlong Industrial Drive Kernersville, NC 27284 Aqua North Carolina, Inc. Attn: Morgan Turner 152E Furlong Industrial Drive Kernersville, NC 27284 United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington, D.C.20450 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 IN i 2 Is I 3 I NCO067091 I11 121 15/12/01 I17 18 Lr j 19 1 .c I 201 I 211 I I I I I I I I I 11 l U 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 11 l U 1 L f6 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating Bt OA --------------Reseved------- ---- 671 �I 70LJ 71 itI 72 L�J 731 174 75L L 80 Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 01:OOPM 15/12/01 12/05/01 Mikkola Downs Subdivision WWTP NCSR 2016 Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Kernersviile NC 27284 02:00PM 15/12/01 17/02/28 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Numher(s) Other Facility Data /// Morgan Lee Turner/ORC/336-996-2841/ Name, Address of Responsible Offcialf-rille/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Thomas J Roberts,202 Mackenan Ct Cary NC 27511//919-467-8712/9194661583 No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Names) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Ron Boone WSRO WO//336-776-9690/ 7 Signature of Management O A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date %wvY ku'% /A/7 l5 EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page# NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 31 NCO067091 I11 12 15/12/01 17 18 ICI Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter. Page# Permit: NCO067091 Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Owner -Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision VW TP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ application? Is the facility as described in the permit? M ❑ ❑ ❑ # Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Record Keepinq Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is all required information readily available, complete and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the chain -of -custody complete? ❑ ❑ ❑ Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ ❑ ❑ (If the facility is = or> 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator ❑ ❑ ❑ on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?. 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ M ❑ Comment: None Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 3 Permit: NCO067091 Owner -Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision WNTP Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 - Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Laboratory Yes No NA NE # Is the facility using a contract lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/_ 0.2 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑ Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is sample collected below all treatment units? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is proper volume collected? N ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the tubing clean? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ representative)? Comment: None Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ sampling location)? , Comment: None Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Type of bar screen a.Manual b.Mechanical ❑ Are the bars adequately screening debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the screen free of excessive debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is disposal of screening in compliance? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the unit in good condition? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Page# 4 Permit: NCO067091 Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Aeration Basins Mode of operation Type of aeration system Is the basin free of dead spots? Are surface aerators and mixers operational? Are the diffusers operational? Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? Is the DO level acceptable? Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) Comment: None Owner -Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision WWrP Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation Yes No NA NE Ext. Air Diffused ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? N ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are weirs level? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of weir blockage? N ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is scum removal adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the drive unit operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? S ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately %of the sidewall depth) ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE Are pumps in place? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are pumps operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Disinfection -Tablet Yes No NA NE Are tablet chlorinators operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 5 Permit: NC0067091 Owner -Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision WNTP Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation Disinfection -Tablet Yes No NA NE Are the tablets the proper size and type? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Number of tubes in use? 3 Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None De -chlorination Yes No NA NE Type of system ? Tablet Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is storage appropriate for cylinders? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the tablets the proper size and type? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ❑ ❑ ❑ Number of tubes in use? - 3 Comment: None Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the flow meter operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: None Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 6 Permit: NCO067091 Inspection Data: 12/01/2015 Aerobic Digester Is the mixing adequate? Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? # Is the odor acceptable? # Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? Comment: None Owner -Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision WVVTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Operations & Maintenance Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: None Yes No NA NE ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 7 United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington, D C. 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 IN 1 2 Is I 3 I NCO078115 I11 12 15112/01 17 18 t C I 19 I c I 201 I 21111_1 11 111111111111111111111111111111111111 �6 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ----------------Reserved------------- 1 72 1 �, 1 67I� 70I LJ 1 71 1 itL J 731 1 174 75I I I I I I I I80 1 Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 11:30AM 15/12/01 12/05/01 Greystone Subdivision WWiP Lot 74 Creek Bed Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Kernersville NC 27284 12:30PM 15/12/01 17/02/28 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Tilles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data M Morgan Lee Turner/ORC/336-996-2841/ Name, Address of Responsible Official[Title]Phone and Fax Number Contacted Dustin K Metreveon,NCSR 1802 Salisbury NC 28144//704-788-9497/7047886006 No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/ Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page# NPDES yr/molday Inspection Type 1 31 Nco078115 I11 12I 15/12/01 117 18 ICI Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter. Page# Permit: NCO078115 Owner -Facility: Greystone Subdivision WWfrP Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ application? Is the facility as described in the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is all required information readily available, complete and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the chain -of -custody complete? ❑ ❑ ❑ Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (If the facility is = or> 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with acertified operator ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: None Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is sample collected below all treatment units? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 3 Permit: NCO078115 Owner-Faciiity: Gmystone Subdivision WVJrP Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is proper volume collected? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the tubing clean? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type ❑ ❑ ❑ representative)? Comment: None Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ sampling location)? Comment: None Laboratory - Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the facility using a contract lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/_ 0.2 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑ Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑ M Comment: None Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the wet well free of excessive grease? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps present? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are Float controls operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Page# 4 Permit: NC0078115 Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Bar Screens Type of bar screen a.Manual b.Mechanical Are the bars adequately screening debris? Is the screen free of excessive debris? Is disposal of screening in compliance? Is the unit in good condition? Comment: None Owner -Facility: Greystone Subdivision WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE Is the basin aerated? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the basin free of excessive grease? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps present? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are float controls operable? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Are audible and visual alarms operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is basin size/volume adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are weirs level? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of weir blockage? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is scum removal adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the drive unit operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin Floc? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately''% of the sidewall depth) ❑ ❑ ❑ M Comment: None Page# 5 Permit: NCO078115 Owner -Facility: Greystone Subdivision WVVfP Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext. Air Type of aeration system Diffused Is the basin free of dead spots? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are the diffusers operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the. DO level acceptable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE Are pumps in place? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Are pumps operational? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the flow meter operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: NoneNone Disinfection -Tablet Yes No NA NE Are tablet chlorinators operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the tablets the proper size and type? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Number of tubes in use? 3 Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? N ❑ ❑ ❑. Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Page# 6 Permit: N00078115 Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 De -chlorination Type of system ? Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? Is storage appropriate for cylinders? # Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? Are the tablets the proper size and type? Comment: None Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? Number of tubes in use? Comment: None Owner -Facility: Greystone Subdivision WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Yes No NA NE Tablet ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ 3 Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? M ❑ ❑ ❑ If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: None Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the mixing adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the odor acceptable? M ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: None Page# 7 United states Environmental Protection Agency _ Form Approved. EPA Washington, D C 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fee Type 1 IN I 2 15 1 3 I NCO083933 I11 12 15/12/01 17 18I( I 19 I S I 20I I I 6 21111111111111111 I I I 11111111111111111111111I f Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ------------Reserved---------- 67 70 I I 71 I I 72 I I 73I I J74 75I I I I I I I I80 L�,J I I LJ it Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 10:OOAM 15/12/01 12/05/01 Salem Quarters WA7P 9999 Rangecrest Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Dale Winston Salem NC 27103 11:00AM 15/12/01 17/02/28 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/-ritles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data /// Morgan Lee Tumer/ORC/336-996-2841/ - Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Thomas J Roberts,202 Mackenan Ct Cary NC 27511/President/919-653-6967/9194661583 No Section C:.Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9680/ 1z 1� - Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date >d%4, - /al7�/S EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page# NPDES yr/mo/day -Inspection Type 1 31 NCO083933 I11 12 15/12/91 17 18 ICI Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter. Page# Permit: NCO083933 Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Permit Owner -Facility: Salem Quarters WWrP Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? Is the facility as described in the permit? # Are there any special conditions for the permit? Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? Comment: None Record Keeping Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? Is all required information readily available, complete and current? Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? Is the chain -of -custody complete? Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? Comment: None Laboratory Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes. No NA NE ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ EY ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ M ❑ Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 3 Permit: NCO083933 Owner -Facility: Salem Quarters WWrP Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Laboratory Yes No NA NE # Is the facility using a contract lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑ Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling Flow proportional? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is sample collected below all treatment units? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is proper volume collected? N ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the tubing clean? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ representative)? Comment: None Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE Is the facility sampling performed as. required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ sampling location)? Comment: None Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Type of bar screen a.Manual b.Mechanical ❑ Are the bars adequately screening debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the screen free of excessive debris? N ❑ ❑ ❑ Is disposal of screening in compliance? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the unit in good condition? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE Page# 4 Permit: NCO083933 Owner. Facillty: Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Salem Quarters WVVrP Compliance Evaluation Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE Is the basin aerated? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the basin free of excessive grease? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps present? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are float controls operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are audible and visual alarms operable? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is basin size/volume adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext. Air Type of aeration system Diffused Is the basin free of dead spots? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ❑ ❑ N ❑ Are the diffusers operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the DO level acceptable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are weirs level? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of weir blockage? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is scum removal adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the drive unit operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 5 Permit: NC0083933 Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Owner -Facility: Salem Quarters WWrP Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation Secondary Clarifier Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately''% of the sidewall depth) Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Excessive solids in weir trough. Unknown where they're coming from. Intend to place effluent polishing filters in operation in order to contain solids. Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE Are pumps in place? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Are pumps operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the flow meter operational? ❑ ❑ ❑ (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE Are extra UV bulbs available on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are UV bulbs clean? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ - Is UV intensity adequate? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is transmittance at or above designed level? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is there a backup system on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is effluent clear and free of solids? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are theyoperating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: None Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 6 Permit: NCO083933 Owner - Facility: seem Quarters WWrP Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Is the mixing adequate? Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? # Is the odor acceptable? # Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? Comment: None Operations & Maintenance Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: None • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 7