HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020451_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20151013 (2)North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
October 13, 2015
Mr. Brantley Price
Town of West Jefferson
P.O. Box 490
West Jefferson, NC 28694
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI)
Town of West Jefferson WWTP
NPDES Permit # NCO020451
Ashe County
Dear Mr. Price:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
On October 8, 2015 a CEI was performed by George Smith. Mr. Charles Call, ORC, was present for the inspection.
The inspection is comprised of an overall evaluation in order to document compliance and noncompliance of: facilities
equipment, capability to meet effluent limits, and terms & conditions with the NPDES permit.
Permit
The permit became effective August 1, 2011 and expires March 31, 2016. A correct copy is kept on file.
Records & Reports
The Repair & Maintenance log is a three ring binder that contains the following sections: pump stations, influent
pumps, grit removal, automatic barscreen, traveling bridge on tertiary filter, blowers, clarifiers, oxidation ditch,
ultraviolet disinfecting lamps, sludge pump, sludge truck, generator. The Town keeps excellent maintenance records.
The chain -of -custody reports are complete, and they clearly document the sample conditions.
The facility documents process control in the oxidation ditch of MLSS, dissolved oxygen, temperature, conductivity,
pH, microscopic examination, and clarifier blanket height. These daily logs were in very good order.
The Annual Performance Report for 2014 was received in the Raleigh office on February 11, 2015.
Facility Site Review
The 3 min automatic barscreen, grit removal, and pre -aeration were all operating properly.
All three influent pumps are functioning properly.
The oxidation ditch had a light brown color and a good earthy odor indicating good treatment. It is unknown at this
time whether the control gate at the inner ring can be adjusted or is properly supported. Currently it is set to give the
highest water level, and therefore the highest dissolved oxygen. The gate will be tested during the winter months
when dissolved oxygen from the rotators are not critically needed.
All four rotating biological contactors were operating.
450 W Hanes Mill Rd., Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: 336-776-98001Internet; www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper
The effluent from the new and old circular clarifiers was clear, with a very minor amount of pin flock over the weirs.
No algae present. Both skimmers were operating. Both secondary clarifiers are operated in an excellent manner.
The effluent from the tertiary sandfilters was clear with no surface solids or scum noticed.
The UV disinfection unit appeared to be properly working. The UV lamps were operating and had sufficient power.
The post aeration unit was working, and there were no solids present.
Flow Measurement
The flow recording charts are kept on file for the required minimum of three years.
Continuous flow measurement at the plant is performed using a 90' V-notch weir with a Sigma 980 ultrasonic device
mounted before the effluent weir. The flow measuring device was calibrated by Milco Calibrations, LLC on
November 24, 2014. Paperwork documentation was maintained in the file.
The instantaneous flow was 177 gallons/minute (0.250 MGD).
Laboratory
The municipal lab received field certification (45284) for Conductivity, Dissolved Oxygen, pH, and Temperature.
Conductivity is performed using an Orion Model 122.
The Orion Star AT21 pH meter is routinely calibrated and documented using a two -point calibration (pH 4 & 10) and
a midrange check (pH 7).
The YSI Model 55 field meter is used to measure for Dissolved Oxygen. Air calibration is performed.
Temperature is recorded .with an Orion 122, and calibrated, which is NIST traceable.
The lab measures and documents the field data in an excellent manner.
The addition of a good microscope, Olympus, Model CX41 is a very good tool that will aide in identifying biological
problems before they become a serious issue. This microscope has proven to be a good investment.
Effluent/Receiving Waters
The effluent from the POTW was crystal clear with no solids, no color, or no odor. The visual appearance of the
effluent is considered to be outstanding at the time of the inspection.
The unnamed tributary to Little Buffalo Creek, Class C-Trout + waters showed no adverse impacts.
Operations & Maintenance
The following Town personnel operate the facility: Charles Call, ORC, Grade W; Jody Walters, Back-up ORC, Grade
I; and Mr. Brandon Patrick, Maintenance, Grade III. The staff perform their operation & maintenance duties in an
outstanding manner.
The MLSS is approximately 3800 mg/L and the dissolved oxygen was 3.80 mg/L.
Self -Monitoring Program
A review of the monthly self -monitoring reports from January 2014 through July 2014 revealed a monthly average
violation for BOD during June 2014.
The Town currently performs influent composite sampling with an Isco Model 3700 FR. A sample aliquot of 250 ml
is collected every 10,080 gallons. This complies with the flow proportion sample requirement.
The Town currently performs effluent composite sampling with an Isco Model 3700 FR. A sample aliquot of 250 ml
is collected every 9,900 gallons. This complies with the flow proportion sample requirement.
The influent & effluent sample compartments were documented at VC with NIST traceable temperature reading.
The upstream and downstream measurements are performed at the proper locations.
Sludge Disposal
The digesters are approximately 30% full. This is considered excellent operations of the plant, especially going into
the winter months.
A screw press was tested during the winter of 2014-2015. It will be available if needed this winter. Mr. Brantley Price
indicated that a grant proposal was submitted to the Appalachian Regulatory Commission for a dewater project for
851K. This includes a screw press and sewer collection system projects.
The inspection is satisfactory. The quality of the effluent is excellent and the plant personnel are considered to perform
their jobs in an excellent manner. If you have any questions please contact George Smith or me at (336) 776-9800.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: WSRO Files
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 h, ( 2 IS I 3 I NCO020451 I11 121 15/10/08 I17 181,•t 191 c I 201 I
211111111111111U11111111111111111111111111- f6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ---------------Reserved-----------
72 LNJ 73I 75I
67I �I 7071 IitlI L L L L_L
80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:OOAM 15/10/08
11/08/01
West Jefferson WWTP
US Hwy 221
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
-
West Jefferson NC 28694
11:15AM 15/10/08
16/03/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
///
Jessie Charles Call/ORC/336-246-3558/
Name, Address of Responsible Offcialfritle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Brantley Price, /Town Manager//
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Facility Site Review EfBuent/Reoeiving Waters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Names) and Signature(s) of Inspectors) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
GeorgeS Smith WSRO WQ//336-776-9700/ C�13 �&/3—
1—
Signature ofManagementQ A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
i
AA6-Azz� - J�,,✓2 -.wsA--> 13eq-z ,rj—
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#
Permit: NCO020451 Owner -Facility: West Jefferson WWrP
inspection Date: 10/08/2015 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
0
❑
❑
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
M
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
M
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or> 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
❑
❑
0
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to_or higher than the facility classification?
M
❑
❑
El
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
M
❑
❑
❑
Page# 3
Permit: NCO020451
Inspection Date: 10/0812015
Record Keeping
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
Owner -Facility: west Jefferson WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
19i7rtTiMM
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Oxidation Ditches
Are the aerators operational?
Are the aerators free of excessive solids build up?
# Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Are settleometer results acceptable (> 30 minutes)?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
Are settelometer results acceptable?(400 to 800 ml/I in 30 minutes)
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 4
Permit: NCO020451
Inspection Date: 10/08/2015
Oxidation Ditches
Comment:
Disinfection - UV
Are extra UV bulbs available on site?
Are UV bulbs clean?
Is UV intensity adequate?
Is transmittance at or above designed level?
Is there a backup system on site?
Is effluent clear and free of solids?
Comment:
Owner -Facility: West Jefferson WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
representative)?
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and
sampling location)?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 5