20230161 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230127

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
11/4/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20230161 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Wilmington Regional Office - [phone] Holley Snider:eads\hasnider:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
4600 Southport -Supply Road Tract
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Kim Williams - Davey Resource Group, Inc.
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
1/27/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Jumping Run Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
SC; Sw
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
33.959253
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Brunswick
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.068842

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1 i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
KDA Investments, Inc.
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Dan Durler
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
Unknown
Yes No
Yes No

2d. Address
Street Address
380 Hamilton Drive SE
Address Line 2
City
Bolivia
Postal / Zip Code
28422
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Williams
4b. Business Name:
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Address Line 2
City
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Code
28403
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Southport
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
20400034
2b. Property size:
19.5
2c. Project Address
Street Address
4600 Southport -Supply Rd
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Southport NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28461 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Jumping Run Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
SC; Sw
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear

3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300050802
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is currently undeveloped and forested. According to DRG's wetland delineation, the site contains approximately 12.4 acres of wetlands, which are mostly located in the southern
and central parts of the site. Wetlands are pocosin/bay habitat and support pond pine, loblolly bay, fetterbush, and gallberry. Uplands support a mix of longleaf pine, pond pine, loblolly bay,
and fetterbush. Adjacent land use is mostly undeveloped and forested habitat.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
12.4 ac
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
N/A
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the project is to construct a container storage development, with a small office trailer. Wetland impacts are needed to construct a road to access the uplands within the site.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The site plan consists of constructing conex containers in uplands in the northern part of the site, a gravel parking lot next to the containers, and a 10' x 40' office trailer on an upland ridge
in the southern part of the site. An 18' wide gravel road will also be constructed along the western property boundary to provide access to the structures. The road will have 2' shoulders
and 3:1 slopes. Several 12" culverts will be installed in wetlands to maintain hydrologic flow.
Erosion control measures will be installed prior to any site disturbance. The limits of disturbance will then be cleared of vegetation. Site grading (including proposed wetland fill) will occur
as depicted on the site plan. Roadways and utilities will be installed. Then building construction will occur. Track hoe, loader, dump truck, bob cat, and other standard construction
equipment will be used.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
Wetland map and data forms are enclosed with this application.
No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Corey Novak
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
Yes No
Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type*(')
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
29. Impact
area*
1
Road
P
Pocosin
W1
Yes
Both
0.489
(acres)

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.489
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.489
2i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The road width has been reduced to 18' (with 2' shoulders) to minimize wetland impacts. It has been placed along the western boundary to utilize
uplands in this area. The applicant considered starting the road along the eastern boundary, following west along the bay rim, and then tying into the
western boundary to try to reduce wetland impacts. However, this would have required that the office trailer be placed in the northern part of the tract.
For safety reasons, the applicant prefers to have the office placed closer to Hwy 211 where it would be more easily accessed by Fire/EMS. Additionally,
it would be more expensive to construct a longer road.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The developer will obtain stormwater and sedimentation and erosion control permits prior to development.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Lower Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Non -riparian wetland
3c. Comments
Quantity:
1 ac
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
The site is located in the Cape Fear River Basin, which does not have State Riparian Buffer Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
State Stormwater Programs
Phase II Coastal Counties
HWQ or ORW Other

Comments:
The project engineer is currently preparing a stormwater plan.
G. Supplementary Information u
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent tracts. No additional impacts to jurisdictional features are anticipated in the future. Additionally,
erosion control and stormwater permits will be obtained to minimize impacts to downstream waters.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
The project will tie into the municipal wastewater treatment system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program database was reviewed to determine if any rare species are known to occur on or near the site. According to their
files, no federally listed species are known to occur on the site, although the site is part of the BSL Wetlands Complex NCNHP Natural Area and
contains several rare habitat types and two historical state -listed plant element occurrences. The red -cockaded woodpecker and American alligator are
known to occur within a one mile radius of the site. The RCW occurrence is from 2021 and includes known clusters from MOTSU and Orton Creek,
which are located one mile or greater east of the site. The USFWS IPaC database was also reviewed and several species were identified as potentially
occurring in the region. Uplands within the site contain an even mix of pines and Ioblolly bays in the overstory and a fairly dense shrub layer of bays and
fetterbush. Therefore, the site does not appear to provide suitable habitat for the RCW. Forested areas within the site could potentially provide
appropriate winter and summer roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat and tri-colored bat. Although the NLEB is known to occur in Brunswick
County, no roost trees have been identified in the county. The site does not appear to provide suitable habitat for any other federally -protected species
known to occur in the area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was reviewed to determine the presence of known cultural or historic
resources. No cultural or historical resources were noted within or adjacent to the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map Service Center website
Miscellaneous U
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
4600 Southport Supply Rd_Attachments.pdf 9.19MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kim Williams
Signature
CJSEs 7'[/[ld-d
Date
1/27/2023

DAVEY#-.
Resource Group
TO: US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
January 27, 2023
NC Division of Water Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: 4600 Southport Supply Road; Southport; Brunswick County, NC
NWP 39/401 WQC Application
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of KDA Investments, Inc., Davey Resource Group, Inc. is submitting a Pre -Construction
Notification form and associated attachments for a commercial development to be located at 4600
Southport Supply Road in Southport, NC. The purpose of the project is to construct a storage facility
within the site.
The project proposes to impact 0.489 acre of jurisdictional wetlands to construct an access road. To
mitigate for unavoidable wetland impacts, the applicant proposes purchasing wetland credits from
the Lower Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank.
If you have any questions, or would like to discuss the application, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403

4600 Southport Supply Rd
Southport, NC
Brunswick County
PCN Attachments
Table of Contents
1.0 LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORMS
2.0 PRE -FILE REQUEST
3.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. LiDAR Map
Figure 4. Soils Map
Figure 5. 1998 Infrared
Figure 6. Aerial Photograph
Figure 7. Site Plan Showing Proposed Wetland Impacts
4.0 WETLANDS INFORMATION
Preliminary Wetlands Map
Data Forms
Antecedent Precipitation Tool Graph
5.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter
USFWS IPaC List
RCW SLOPES Appendix B.
6.0 LCFUMB CREDIT ACCEPTANCE LETTER

1.0 LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORMS

Resource Group
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Uwe, the undersigned, hereby authorize Davey Resource Group, Inc. to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for 4600 Southport Supply Road located in Erurmvick County, NC. All questions regarding
this project should be directed to Davey Resource Group.
Print Name
Date
Phone. [phone] •Fax* 910.452.€ 0610
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 . Wilmington, NC 28403

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTMCATIONIJ
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned., am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
I/'� it? /e�T�/k u'-Fs- -TAc,
Print Name
Capacity- ® er E Authorized A eW
g
171(
^d
Date
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
E] I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an isaitial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
® I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
MI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
® Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTIIISAOE protocols, skip to Part E_
a Lf there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization fornAetter signed by owner(s)-
version: May 2017 Page 3

2.0 PRE -FILE REQUEST

1 /26/23, 4:14 PM The Davey Tree Expert Company Mail - 4600 Southport Supply Rd; Brunswick Co.; Pre -File Request
DAVEYS Williams, Kim <[e-mail]>
4600 Southport Supply Rd; Brunswick Co.; Pre -File Request
1 message
Williams, Kim <[e-mail]>
To: 401 [e-mail]
Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 10:38 AM
Hello -
We are working on a commercial development to be located at 4600 Southport Supply Rd in Brunswick County. The
owner is currently preparing a site plan and wetland impacts are anticipated.
Applicant:
Dan Durler; KDA Investments Inc.
[e-mail]
Site: 4600 Southport Supply Rd; Brunswick Co.
This email serves as our pre -filing meeting request.
Thanks so much!
Kim
Kim Williams I Section Manager
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
Direct: 910-452-0001 x 1908 1 Cell: 910.471.5035 1 Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15 1 Wilmington, NC 28403
DAVEY .
Resource Group
Visit our local office page
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=5f499cdl a1 &view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar8889753968744548955%7Cmsg-a° k3Ar60888942794... 1 /1

3.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. LiDAR Map
Figure 4. Soils Map
Figure 5. 1998 Infrared
Figure 6. Aerial Photograph
Figure 7. Site Plan Showing Proposed Wetland Impacts

fin`
F
Boiling
Spring Lakes
Rya
A
WIWI,
Project
Area
F
en
0i
T.
C
Southport
C-11 Beach
Long Beach
dak Island
B'd I
Ili
lu b
L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.437\Maps N 0 0.5 1 2
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. Miles
Map Source: World Street Map Scale applies to 11X1 7" print.
4600 Southport - Supply Rd
Brunswick County, INC DAVEYI Figure 1.
Resource Group
October 2022 3805 Wrightsville Avenue Vicinity Map
DRGNCW22.437 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

-„� j�
A L—
.Iu
Us
L � .1 �_•
-� Li
-;LLL.
..tip= - ._si1J. . _,-- �—
• - •• S.LL_ ssr��
.
t
LLIJJ
�• -- -~
.htSC
-
.,tom_-�h5idr-
-
•!:'• -
, I
LS�+�.
-- �L• 1 -
.�V
J
1% U,
shy-_ -•
AIL+
L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.437\Maps N 0 200 400 800
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. ft
Map Source: USGS Topographic Map: Southport Quad Scale applies to 11X17" print.
4600 Southport - Supply Rd
Brunswick County, NC DAVEY
Resource Group Figure 2.
October 2022 3805 Wrightsville Avenue Topographic Map
DRGNCW22.437 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

>r
4,
%mot y/ •� 40' _ . t
.,i
Ir
4.
t �
.� r-
I
10011 �l -47� 7,
-
x a [y +
a i rr
Legend
Value
High: 44.5713
_ s I � �� ~ � ' ,�,� `� —• � Low: 36.61
21, t I r
,y
L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.437\Maps N 0 75 150 300
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. ft
Map Source: QL2 UDAR Data A Scale applies to 11X17" print.
4600 Southport - Supply Rd
`�
Brunswick County, NC
DA E i/
Figure 3.
Resource Group
October 2022
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LiDAR Map
DRGNCW22.437
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

Y`
d
Y.,
d
Soils
Lo: Leon fine sand
Mu: Murville fine sand
+r r
L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.437\Maps
N 0 150 300 600
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
R
Map Source: NRCS Soils Data for Brunswick Co.
Scale applies to 11X17" print.
4600 Southport - Supply Rd
Brunswick County, NC
DAVEY .
Resource Group
Figure 4.
October 2022
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Soils Map
DRGNCW22.437
Wilmington, NC 28403
(910) asz-0-0001

...y •pia"" i� - '
r�, ;
1 r rye.
�i•,y�r � !•,! !'► IM �'fi�ii' i+T�`�r7.�L��ia'1�.1 r+rC�s
�Ssrl�::W, -Y l 'ti-'1�° -` �JVM�.•��i�L'77 - "�+rCr'r..} r�7`-��
4
L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.437\Maps N 0 150 300 600
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. ft
Map Source: NAPP 1998 Infrared Scale applies to 11X17" print.
4600 Southport - Supply Rd
Brunswick County, NC DAVEY . Figure 5.
Resource Group 1998 Infrared Aerial
October 2022 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
DRGNCW22.437 Wilmington, 28403
(slo)asz-0-0001

L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.437\Maps N 0 100 200 400
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. ft
Map Source: NC DneMap 2020 Aerial A Scale applies to 11X17" print.
4600 Southport - Supply Rd
Aw—
Brunswick County, NC DAVEY . Figure 6.
Resource Group
October 2022 3805 Wrightsville Avenue Aerial Photograph
DRGNCW22.437 Wilmington, 28403
(slo)asz-0-0001

NOTES.
1. THE PURPOSE OF THE DEPICTED SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF DRIVES AND OFFICE TRAILER. 2
P 9
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. NEW BRUNSWICK COUNTY PIN NO'208705274899,
�r
PAZONE "X" PER
.
4FE APNO.3720203700K
R NENEMHM
�'xw
EF^FECOTIIVE DATES AUGU T27,2013. -- -_--
--- --- -- mrmrzv _--- _--
S. THIS OFFICE HAS NOT RESEARCHED ALL AMENDMENTS OF
COVENANTS. SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS I
RIGHT OF WAYS I ENCUMBRANCES A FULL TITLE REPORT
MAY REVEAL.
Wetlantl Oefniatation nag Locatbns
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
U
/
/
/
a /N
�
Z
Q
0B Q2
Z 4139
l U PG 480
TOTAL PDF
WETLAND IMPACT = 21, 21,311 SF / 0.489 AT
/
/ A14
A13
/ AJ2
/ B2
SETBACK TABLE
25" MAX FRONT SETBACK
6REAR SETBACK
10. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK
S >4 3,12 E
\44000'
C27
C26
C25
2
FIR FT,
- C 9
0; Ct6
N CI5
Cls
n cil
9 0
C C3
C]-------------
N
�N
D� C4 C5
3
s -JNVr KDA- - - -
DTMENT
-
6 Dqs �a 4.749 . s rNC
/-9&70
. 10PC 12� -
- - 0.2102/
ANNUNC N20
_
Da 2354
9
Point
NorMing
(NAM3)
EasSng
(MESS)
Esvatun
(NAVC68)
Latitatle
(WGS84)
Lorgitutla
(WG584)
Al
770W.40
2282538.79
39.47
N33.958156
1M8.068393
A2
7711191
228252623
3916
M3953221
W78 MUM
AS
7715320228249575
3948
M3953335
W78 W8533
A4
77193.67
2282471.40
39.0
M3.95U47
W18.088612
AS
772M.35
2282448.58
38.55
N33.953559
W8,068666
A6
77=49
2282413.02
39.08
N33.953679
W8,068802
A7
77299.75
2282365.92
39.01
1,03.958741
W78.0689W
AS
77MIA5
2282347.92
44.35
1,03.958855
1M8.069014
A9
77383.68
2282301 63
40.23
N33SN974
W18.069166
A10
177407,3112282239.0
40.32
N33.959040
W18.069368
All
77431.59
228219866
40.22
M3.959108
4MB.W9510
Al2
7747570
2282167621
3976
NIS 959230
W78 W9605
A13
7750550
228214111
4002
M3959312
W78 W9691
A14
77516.29
22U 29.74
40.81
M3.959U2
W/8.069728
B1
774M.92
2282088.50
40.87
M3.959114
W/8069887
W
774W.67
2282119A5
40.16
M3.959025
WS.069767
B3
77374.47
2282106.07
40.56
NO3.958952
1M8.069611
M
77332.00
2282210.46
40.46
N33.958834
4MB.W9468
as
77310,86
2282245.08
30.72
N33AN775
W78.W9354
Be
77302.26
2282289.49
WAD
INGNS8750
W78.W92W
B7
77269.85
2282341 60
39.53
133.958660
W78.069037
a8
7721678
228236630
3929
N13958513
W78M89M
a9
7717575228241008
4009
N33 OM399
W76 W8815
B10
177125.4612282451
37
40.71
M3.958260
MS W8680
B11
77078.98
E824603
39.89
M3.958132
W78.068633
B12
77015.43
228250;06
40.46
M3.957957
W78.068506
B13
76903.83
2282529.22
40.76
W3.957814
1M8.068428
Ci
77913.28
2282256.58
40.32
W3.960430
1M8.069298
U
77900.99
2282288.92
40.03
M3.960395
W78.069192
C3
778W.11
2282309.38
39.17
N33.900307
W78.C69125
CS
77M356
2292U315
38U
N33960236
I W78WOOD5
C5
77646.75
2282376.36
40.23
N33.960Ul
1M8.068905
CB
77865.81
2282393.10
38.96
N33SN298
W78.068849
C7
778UM
228239OS7
38.41
N33SN347
WO
CS
7790346
2282401 57
3870
N33960399
W76 W8820
09
7792722
228241523
3902
.31..
W760687]4
CIO
77940.20
2282"036
36.68
N33.980499
W78.W8691
C11
7790572
22,429.60
45.30
N33960569
W76.W8739
C12
7799195
2282395 76
39.23
N33 960642
W78.068837
C13
7802658
228239906
3995
W3980737
W78.068825
C14
7805084
228241536
3852
N33860804
4MB.W87TO
C15
7807338
22824MO9
4004
N33860865
W78.068708
C16
]81 W.142202434-23
4004
N33960963
W78 W87W
C17
78153.09
2282425.55
40.09
M3.961OU
W78.068]33
CIS
78192.30
2282452.07
40.22
M3.961191
W78.068665
CIS
781M.0
2282501 AS
40.06
M3.961202
W78.W8402
MO
78233.6D
2282505.24
4025
M3.961303
4MB.WMN
C21
78261.00
2262544.70
40.02
M3 .Ml=
W ll.W8337
C22
78256.05
2212582.29
39.M
M3.961363
W78.W8180
C23
78283.13
2282816.92
30.03
M3.961437
W ILOSION
C24
78316.95
2282638,92
39S2
M3.961529
W78.W8025
C25
70M2.77
2282614,18
40A3
M3.981600
W78.W81M
CM
78SUN
228262763
4005
N33961661
W76 W8061
C2]
78392.62
22826"74
4003
M3961737
W76 W8003
US
78412.78
2282669.78
39AO
M3.961791
W78.W7920
C29
78403.96
228271125
40.02
N33.961766
WNl W77L
C30
78422.0
228273135
40.28
N33.961817
WNl W7697
C31
7843586
2282753.0
38.15
M3.961853
W76.067643
C32
78424.02
2282774.20
39.06
W3.961820
W76.067575
C33
78415.72
2282794sO
39.58
M3.961796
W 8,0675W
C34
]836].87
2282870,701
39.44
M3.961662
W78.067259
01
778SS31
2282246.35
40.18
133SM364
W78.069332
32
77868.13
2282278.52
40.16
N33.980305
4MB.W922]
C3
77645.81)
2282296A7
40.65
NJ3.960243
W7B.W9166
M.
Dl
778U.35
2282288.92
39.13
.5.960185
M
D5
7780328228230782
3910
M3 MOD 26
W78 W9132
W
7r7320
2282207-47
3875
N33960044
W8 069167
C/
]T/52.81
228228258
38.88
N33.959988
W78.W9216
08
77148.86
2282241.72
39.38
N33.959978
W78.W9352
D9
7775151
228220344
39U
M3959987
W78WN78
r
6
�10
/
7
/
LINETABLE
- - - - - - - -
BEARNG DISTANCE
1 S 74"30'32" E 122 I's
OPOSED fi WIDE
F.D E TO - --- - - -
2 N88-47'31"E 104.40'
3 S7430'32'E 100.OD'
-
4 S 5T48'35" E 104.40
5 S7eU'18'E 1726
A.
\ / / 4
/ A
,
1
00 f TRAILER_ BB
- NCOOT C/A
ER RIONT OF WAY - - -
PIT
4240 PG 939 - - - - -
N 4t\UNE �. �� 0.602 ACRES* - - - - -
�2BW-.� NIR- - - -
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 100 2DO
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 200 ft.
NIR 2
��� - F
^' 743128, \-\ -�N4Y NIR
gy 1 p, C['��N��lG/YWgY 2
0/4 rWG BIgyT 211 EIRDd xw7 4
�•\ _ 1111Nf o..A1UE1
FIGURE 7 L Proposed Wetland Impacts (0.489 ac)
DATE
SALE
DRIVEWAY PERMIT SURVEY
2/07/2022
1" = 200'
FOR:
KDA INVESTMENTS INC
4600 SOUTHPORT SUPPLY ROAD SE
LOT 36 MOREHEAD FARMS PLAT MAP U PAGES 9810
SOUTHPORT, NO 28461
DR4r1'N BY
J.A.G.
CHECYED BY
B.F.F.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SHEET
1 OF 1
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
DRAWN UNDER MY DIREIR 1URE-1111C THE I --
NOT 611R_ED ARE SHONN AS BROKEN LINES FROM
REFERENCED RECORD INFORMATION: THAT THIS
NIT
�E -a ?NOBoR SALES.
NcuRR L sFL S
°111111Ir11„'>
SEAL =
L-5104
din
BENJAMIN F FARROW III, PLS
3223 KELLERTON PL
WILMINGTON NC 28409
910-524-9S�5
LICENSE: L-5104

4.0 WETLANDS INFORMATION
Preliminary Wetlands Map
Data Forms
Antecedent Precipitation Tool Graph

L:\WETLANDS\2022 WETLANDS FILES\DRGNCW22.437 --- N
4600 Southport -Supply Rd, KDA Investments Inc\Maps\GIS 0 100 200 400
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. ft
Map Source: 2020 NC Onel A Scale applies to 11 X17" print
4600 Southport - Supply Rd
DAVEYM.
Section 401/404
Brunswick County, NC
Resource Group
Delineation
Map Date: October 26, 2022
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Preliminary Sketch
y
DRGNCW22.437
[phone]

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 4600 Southport Supply Rd City/County: Southport/Brunswick Sampling Date: 10/20/22
Applicant/Owner: KDA Investments State: NC Sampling Point: DP1-Up
Investigator(s): Corey Novak Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Micro Ridge Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 33.958575 Long:-78.068868 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Murville fine sand NWI classification: PFo3/4Bd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
According to Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network, normal conditions were
present at the time of the field work.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (All)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
—Surface
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (B5)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No OWT visible in top 24"
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1-Up
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Pinus palustris
2. Pinus serotina
3. Gordonia lasianthus
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 30
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Gordonia lasianthus
2. Lyonia lucida
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
20
Yes
FACU
10
No
FACW
30
Yes
FACW
60 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 12
10 Yes FACW
20 Yes FACW
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
_=Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
No herbaceous layer. Recently mowed.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1-Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 3/1 Sandy 60% coated
10-24 10YR 5/1 Sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al) _Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier
Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy
Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) —Marl
(F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6) —Piedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) _Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 4600 Southport Supply Rd City/County: Southport/Brunswick Sampling Date: 10/20/22
Applicant/Owner: KDA Investments State: NC Sampling Point: DP1-Wet
Investigator(s): Corey Novak Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Pocosin Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 33.958815 Long:-78.068628 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Murville fine sand NWI classification: PFo3/4Bd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
According to Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network, normal conditions were
present at the time of the field work.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (A1)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
—Surface
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (B5)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 18
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1-Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Pinus serotina
2. Gordonia lasianthus
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
30
Yes
FACW
10
Yes
FACW
40
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
8
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Cyrilla racemiflora
30
Yes
FACW
2. Ilex glabra
30
Yes
FACW
3. Lyonia lucida
30
Yes
FACW
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 45
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Ilex glabra
2. Lyonia lucida
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
90 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
20 Yes FACW
20 Yes FACW
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
40 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 8 height.
15 Yes FAC
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
No herbaceous layer. Recently mowed.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-24
10YR 211 Mucky Sand 100% coated
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al) _Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier
Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy
Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
X 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) —Marl
(F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6) —Piedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_Dark _Anomalous
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) _Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

M V t0 N N O
L O a
N � C
D O
70
M O
� NO Z
N
u N
C N
❑ ON
> N
O N
z �
N
U N
O�
D N
C N
�N
O N
� N
Q NN
N
N
O
N
N
C ry
� p
� N
� N
L N
p_N
Q NN
L N
t6 N
�clI I I
O O] 0 7 N O
rl
(sopul) Ilp�uip\d

5.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter
USFWS IPaC List
RCW SLOPES Manual Appendix B.

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
January 13, 2023
Kim Williams
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: 4600 Southport Supply Rd
Dear Kim Williams:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-20530
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

\ \
s 2
7a
v
\ /
/
3
/
/ \
g2
g
3d
\\
/
2 CO
9 %
z e
\ ±
<
\
/ /
\
a z
\
\ CO
s�
\CO
u
\
\
\ \
k —
e
CO\
e G
/
\
x
x
x x
.» /
\
4
6
6
6 6
\ H
<
e
0 d
\
y/�
ee
E\/
\/
3
3
3
2 0
CO »
/
FY
\\\/
3
O
_ = o e
2//0
\
\ H
CO
/ z > g
)
43%Z
\%/\
\
\
/ / \
\ \
\
s/
/
o
a
0
a
0
a
/
._
= 2
CO
g
CO
�\
.y
CO
\
? =
2 /
\
°
5
2
§
/
\
\ §
u
®
\ 0
/
3 m
\ 3
»
CO/
± E
g
2 2
E
«
E o
/
\
e
/3
\
COE
COCO
s
\
/
\
m
\ %
<
j
e
a)\E
u
2
E CC3>
o
z e=
s e
/»
E
2
x
e
\
\ \
\
\ \
�)
\
c
=
D-
E
%-
.\
a e z
e=
c e=
u
2
0
e
�
���\f\co-E
\
s
\\
\d\y/\\/O\
/
CO
�
CC)
/
t
%
G
c
m
»
a s
\ \
\
a
\
v
\
v
\ \
\
\
=
2
a
G
t
CO
CO
s
/ g
0E
> >
\ \
>
\
m\
=
4§s
\ / z
\
E \ E
COE
3 \
\
` s
E x/
E 2 E
E
-/
2
\/
//\
\///
\/
//
//\
B
�
s
§
/

CO
■
■
CO
/
\
\/
4 >
sseo
e z a e
s=oe
CO 0
/\\
J>o e
E ±
2//Z 4
Co
e
(1) 0 �
\ / 0
_y c
2 e
2 3
CO 0
u \
\ CO
�
\
O §
\
E CO
H ?
CO
\ \
2 m
/ E
CO \Z
CO CO
2
s
s
7a
0
v
/ /
g2
\
g
/
/ 3
s
>
3 /
CO e
9
2 CO
/ CO
COs
L\
±
H
s
E
\/
A\
E
E
\ \
Y
Y \
\ \
e
&
& \
eal
u �
O o
\\
ƒ
4
3 3
ry
u
/
\ ®
® \
3 9
9 3
E E
E E
5 5
5 5
6 6
6 6
3 3
3 \
v
a.
s u u
s
�
CO CO
\
M
M
\
\®/\
e
e
o
o
eee
e e e
s
\
CO E
$
\
\
e
4
E E
E E E
2
= =
/
\\
/
\\\
C
\ \
C
\ \ \
e e
e e e
0
2 2
0
o c o
/
\ /
\2G
/
\ \
/
-/
\y\
`
\
\
\
\
\
\
3
% / \
$
3 3
¢
6
& % 3
\
\
%
%
\ \
\
\
/ \
/
\ \
/
2
\
/
E
CO
O z
/ E
\_\
CO
a
z z z
a �
_�
4
® 4
CO CO co
/
\
\
_
CO
\
\ / >
e
0
n D
CO
g/
coe
c c c
9
0 n
\
.- \
2
/ / / /
o
\
E _
\
'o\
% /
2 /
2 > > >
s
co
D-r
\ -0
?
/
®
co
> -
= s
>
o 0
\
CO
e
CO
=
CO CO CO
CO
\ 0
CO
2
/ / /
- /
\
z
.9
/ \
_ _ _
: : :
\
e
D-
/
\
e
a
/
§s
%
>ae
w e
/ » 3
» ®
>
y
.k
}
»
E
/ / /
e
e /
/ e
/ %
~ « ~
®
©
3
26
/-
e
e
/
0
2
e c
D- x
® /
/
\ /
\
G
c
/ %
t
$ $ $
o
.CC3-
\
\
u
\ \
.k
? \ \ \\
/
/
y._
» %
./
z
.z.z 5
e
e e e
/
/
_
>_=
3 e e e>
e>-0/\
2-
2
E 2
0
0 0 0
MO
/\T
s>
D-(n
/%S%d%///u/\§
O/\\
333
\
co
coo
co\
a
a
cc)m
\
a-
\
\
\
\ \
0-) \
cc)
3 a
t
t t t
\
>
> >
>
>
>
>
CO
CO CO CO
x
x
a
a a
a
a
a
a
6
6 6 6
-
z
0
2
_ -
E CO
_ - _
E CO E
- _ -
CO E CO
_ -
E CO
_
E
-
2
=
E
»
»»
CO
5
CO CO CO
5 3 5
w/
-0\
/ 2
E 2
E 2 E
2 E 2
E 2
E
2
E
/
///
CO=
e COo
COo
COo
COo COo
COo
CO
e
e e
CO
CO CO CO
e3
3
oozuzuzu
z u z
u z
u
Ze
2
22
>
>>>
ra
s
\
/

CO CO
s 2
7a
va
//
//
\\/
s
ess� -
e _ _
- e ± ® CO
n _
3/
= CO =
e- e
=
c o
§
CO %
s®
®
% ( /
(D J o
6 % / % n
2 a) e- FY
e ® e
= 2 \ \ ƒ
e
» e H 7
>
E
E
/
2 D
2 4 D
/
\ \
\ \ \
u
s e
x v e
4
6
6
/
\(®
E
E/
c c
o 2 2
e
/ 2
3
u
O
Al
\ �
e 2
\ \ �5
= J CC)CC)o C »
E
e
Eo \\
y > e
/
e e
k 5 z
? e .Cl
»P O.
\\\
/
= m
E / /
/ / 2
CC) CC)52\
j .- /
o .2 m
E 2 _
\\\
t t t
e e e
266
to] me]
/ / /
CC) % %
» >
/b
\
\
4 e �
\ 0
\ \
0
\
/
3
E
}
O /
/ E
2 /
\ \
\ �
\ /
E
\ \
o a
CC) �/
< °Cl
\ m s
CC)
Z 3
\
/
\
%
u u
/ / / /
4
\ \ u \
/ uzu
e / e
/ 2U
\ / z \ z
z 4 / e /
2 e Z e
\ \
» E
/ ƒ
B
�
s
§
/

Q
Q
�D/
C1)
If
^0
CL
-F�
0
cn
0
CID
CID
0
L J
0
N
2
z
Z
Q
Z
2 W c
Z < C Om
a ru
ru
Q 0
(N a
d
rn
N ru N
IL �
co a
cz
N
a

,`J fl. Jl�h Nr`�Fili'
United States Department of the Interior
n
7 L
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
tlRr-'' Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: January 20, 2023
Project Code: 2023-0036116
Project Name: 4600 Southport Supply Rd
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

01/20/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat maybe affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

01/20/2023
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
■ Migratory Birds

01/20/2023
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

01/20/2023
Project Summary
Project Code: 2023-0036116
Project Name: 4600 Southport Supply Rd
Project Type: Commercial Development
Project Description: Commercial development
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www. google.com/maps/@33.96033435,-78.06850473893448,14z
Counties: Brunswick County, North Carolina

01/20/2023
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 15 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME
STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus
Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Endangered
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Birds
NAME
STATUS
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus
Threatened
Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except
those areas where listed as endangered.
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red Knot Calidris canutus ru fa
Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614

01/20/2023
4
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
STATUS
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
Population: North Atlantic DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: littps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Endangered
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110
Snails
NAME
STATUS
Magnificent Ramshorn Planorbella magni fica Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical Endangered
habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6216
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743

01/20/2023
Flowering Plants
NAME
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
STATUS
Endangered
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulae folia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: littps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Threatened
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

01/20/2023
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Ace and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treated of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Sep 30
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6177
Bald Eagle Holiaeetus leucocepholus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.

01/20/2023
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Painted Bunting Posserina ciris Breeds Apr 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions to Aug 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocepholus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.

01/20/2023
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
BCC angs Sparrow +--+ 1 I I it 1111111111111111---- ---- ---
BCC Rans Sparr 4 +4 ---- I --
(CON)
Bald Eagle ISO No OF, loll hill 1111 L-±+ +-++ -++�++ ��
Non -BCC ++ IIII IIII IIII IIII
Vulnerable

01/20/2023
4
Nuthatch Brown -headed U-1 EU Al _+11 +1111111111111111111 EU —�-- -A
BCC - BCR --
Kentucky Warbler
1 +--+
BCC Rangewide ++�—----++' I I I + —++� ��-- ---- ---+
(CON)
Lesser Yellowlegs
BCC Rangewide++'
++++ ++++ +++— ��++
—++— — — — — — — — — ---+
(CON)
Painted
4+4 — ----
—+1I
IIII
11111111
IN-4-
-++— — — — — — — — — ---+
BBuRndng
BCC
Prairie Warbler
4+4 — ----
** 0*00 �r
—+" will +tt++ + +— ��++
—"� ��-- ---- ---+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler.
1 1 1 -+— — — — — — — — — ---+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
1 T I + ++'— —'++—++—'--- — — — — ---1
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird '+— ---- —+++ ++++ ++++ +++— ­++ —++— — — — — — — — — ---+
BCC-BCR
Additional information can be found using the following links:
■ Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-mig-ratorv-birds
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

01/20/2023
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding_,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (SCRs) in the continental USA; and

01/20/2023
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell

01/20/2023
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

01/20/2023
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency:
Davey Resource Group
Name:
Kim Williams
Address:
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
City:
Wilmington
State:
NC
Zip:
28403
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9104520001

RCW SLOPES Manual — North Carolina
March 2022
Appendix B — Red -cockaded Woodpecker Effects Determination Key
4600 Southport -Supply Rd
ORM2 No.:
USFWS Reference No. (if applicable):
Date : 1/26/23
US A Army Corps
of Engineers -
1) Is the action areal located within the RCW consultation area (see Appendix A and project -specific
results from a project -specific IPaC or internal USACE GIS review)?
a) Yes......................................................................................................................................... go to 2
b) No...................................................................................................................................... No effectZ
2) Is the action areal located in the northeastern coastal plain (see Appendix A)?
a) Yes.......................................................................................................................................... go to 3
b) No (the project is located in piedmont, sandhills, or southeastern coastal plain) .................go to 4
3) Is the action areal located in a forested area with pine trees present in northeast North Carolina (e.g.,
high pocosin, Atlantic white cedar, nonriverine swamp forests, pond pine woodland, coastal fringe
evergreen forest, wet successional pine/pine-hardwood forest, or pine plantation or uplands)? If yes,
are the pine trees greater than 30 years of age (if stand age is not readily determined, refer to Table
1 for a description of the minimum dbh of 30-year-old pines associated with each community type).
If the answer to both of these questions is yes, choose Yes below. If the answer to one or both
questions is no, then choose No below.
a) Yes.......................................................................................................................................... go to 8
b) No...................................................................................................................................... No effectZ
4) Is the action areal located within suitable RCW foraging or nesting habitat (pine or pine/hardwood
stands in which 50% or more of the dominant trees are pines and the dominant pine trees are 30
years of age or older or >_8-inches dbh')?
a) Yes.......................................................................................................................................... go to 5
b) No...................................................................................................................................... No effectZ
5) Will any activity in the action area' remove trees equal to or greater than 8 inches dbh; or will any
activity occur within 200 feet of known RCW cavity trees? If unable to determine the location of a
cavity tree with confidence, contact the USFWS Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office.
a) Yes (to one or both)............................................................................................................... go to 6
b) No............................................................................................................................................ NLAA'
12

RCW SLOPES Manual — North Carolina
March 2022
6) Is the action areal located in suitable RCW nesting habitat (in the sandhills and piedmont: pine or
pine/hardwood stands that contain pines 60 years in age or older or >_10 inches dbh; in the
southeastern coastal plain: pine or pine/hardwood stands that contain pines >_8 inches dbh, including
but not limited to pine flatwoods, pocosin, pine savannah, upland pine/hardwood)?
a) Yes........................................................................................................................................... go to 9
b) No............................................................................................................................................goto7
7) Does suitable nesting habitat occur within 0.5 miles of suitable foraging habitat that would be
impacted by any activity in the action areal?
a) Yes......................................................................................................................................... go to 9
b) No............................................................................................................................................ NLAA3
8) Refer to Table 1 in the SLOPES for the northeastern North Carolina habitat type in the action areal.
Are pine trees with a dbh equal to or greater than that shown in Table 1 proposed to be removed in
the action areal, or is the action areal within 200 feet of a cavity tree? If the answer to either of these
questions is yes, choose Yes below. If unable to determine the location of a cavity tree with
confidence, then contact the USFWS Raleigh Field Office.
a) Yes......................................................................................................................................... go to 9
b) No............................................................................................................................................ NLAA3
9) Contact the appropriate USACE representative for a pre -application meeting to determine if a survey
is necessary (for a list of USACE representatives please see the contact list at http://saw-
reg.usace.army.mil/FO/PM List.pdf). Note that project -specific information, such as a delineation of
waters of the U.S., project plans, and details concerning certain activities on disturbances that would
occur in the action areal (e.g. percussive activities, forest management, or similar disturbances), may
be needed for the USACE to determine the action area(s)l of the project. If a survey is required and
agreed to by the applicant, all suitable RCW nesting habitat within 0.5 miles of the action areal should
be surveyed according to USFWS protocol for the presence of RCW cavity trees'. If the applicant is
unwilling or unable to conduct the survey, standard consultation with the USFWS should begin. Such
surveys are conducted by running line transects through stands and visually inspecting all medium-
sized and large pines for evidence of cavity excavation by RCWs. Transects must be spaced so that all
trees are inspected and are run north -south.
Was a survey performed?
a) Yes, a survey was performed, and RCW cavity trees were observed .................................... go to 10
b) Yes, the survey was submitted to the USFWS for concurrence, and the USFWS concurred with the
results (no RCW cavity trees were observed).......................................................................... NLAA3
c) No, the USACE determined that a survey was not required and the USFWS
concurred................................................................................................................................. NLAA3
d) No, a survey was not performed....................................................................Consultation required'
10) Does the project involve activities or disturbances in the action areal (e.g., percussive activities, forest
management, or similar disturbances) within the 200-foot cavity tree buffer, and/or cause removal or
damage to RCW cavity trees (e.g., via root compaction, soil compaction)? If yes to either or both then
consultation is required.
a) Yes.................................................................................................................Consultation required'
b) No......................................................................................................................................... go to 11
13

RCW SLOPES Manual — North Carolina
March 2022
11) Has a foraging habitat analysis (FHA)' been conducted to determine whether enough foraging habitat
would remain for each RCW group post -project? For information on how to conduct an FHA', refer to
the "Procedures for Determining Foraging Habitat Availability" and the Private Land Guidelines.'
a) Yes, the FHA' has been submitted to the USFWS for concurrence' and the USFWS concurred that
adequate amounts of foraging habitat would remain post -project ...................................... NLAA3
b) Yes, and review of the FHA' by the USACE along with concurrence from USFWS determined
inadequate amounts of foraging habitat would remain post -project Consultation required'
c) No, an FHA' has not been conducted..........................................................Consultation required'
'Action Area means all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action and not merely the immediate area involved
in the action. Please contact the appropriate USACE representative for any questions as to the action area for the Federal action.
For a list of USACE representatives, please see the contact list at: http://saw-reg.usace.army.miI/FO/PMList.pdf.
'No effect — The proposed project would result in no effect to this species and/or its federally designated critical habitat (if
applicable). Further consultation with the USFWS Raleigh and Asheville Ecological Services field offices is not necessary for the
project as described.
3NLAA—The proposed project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect this species and/or its designated critical habitat (if
applicable). NLAA determinations for projects made pursuant to this key require no further consultation with the USFWS Raleigh
and Asheville Ecological Services field offices, therefore, consultation is considered complete for this species. For General Permits,
submittal of a Pre -Construction Notification to the USACE will be required for all NLAA determinations.
4Follow link to USFWS RCW Recovery Plan, Appendix 4 for additional information on nesting and foraging habitats, and survey
protocol (https://www.fws.gov/rcwrecovery/files/RecoveryPlan/survey protocol.pdf)
-'Consultation required — Contact the USACE to begin this consultation process. For a list of USACE representatives please see the
contact list at http://saw-reg.usace.army.miI/FO/PMList.pdf. Further consultation with the USFWS Raleigh and Asheville
Ecological Services field offices is necessary to discern if the activity would result in a "no effect," "not likely to adversely affect,"
or "likely to adversely affect" determination.
6Follow links for additional information on conducting FHA (https://www.fws.gov/rcwrecovery/matrix.html) and for
determining foraging habitat availability(https://www.fws.gov/ncsandhills/files/fha data collection procedures.pdf).
'Follow link for additional information regarding determination for adequate amount of foraging habitat
(https://www.fws.gov/rcwrecovery/files/RecoveryPlan/private lands guidelines.pdf).
8 FHA —When an FHA is conducted, the USACE must provide the FHA to USFWS for review and concurrence
Additional Information
Uplands within the site contain an even mix of pines and loblolly bays in the overstory and a fairly dense shrub layer of bays and fetterbush.
Wetlands contain a canopy of pond pines and are densely vegetated. Therefore, the site does not appear to provide suitable habitat for the
RCW.
14

6.0 LCFUMB CREDIT ACCEPTANCE LETTER

LOWER CAPE FEAR UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
STATEMENT OF CREDIT AVAILIBILITY
January 24, 2023
TO: KDA Investments, Inc. FROM: Lower Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
c/o Dan Durler c/o Davey Resource Group Inc
380 Hamilton Drive SW 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Bolivia NC 28422 Wilmington, NC 28403
Project: 4600 Southport Supply Road (Brunswick County, NC)
Dear Mr. Durler:
Pursuant to the recent credit request submitted on your behalf, the Lower Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation
Bank (LCFUMB) is providing confirmation of acceptance to supply mitigation credits for proposed non -
riparian wetland impacts associated with 4600 Southport Supply Road (Brunswick County, NC). This
acceptance is conditional upon receipt of payment as outlined below. Please refer to the table below
depicting the type and quantity of credits requested and reserved for your project.
Mitigation Type I Credits Reserved I Fee Per Unit Fee
Stream
Non -Riparian Wetland
we
1.0
$646.12
$70,939.17
Riparian (Riverine) Wetland I 0.0 I $70,939.17
$0.00
$70,939.17
$0.00
Total Fee' $70,939.17
Based upon receipt of your email transmitted on January 24, 2023, LCFUMB will reserve 1.0 non -riparian
wetland credits for a period of up to 90 days from the date of this letter. Note that requests to reserve
credits beyond 90 days will require a deposit. Please contact us if you need a reservation to extend beyond
the 90-day period.
Upon request for receipt of credit transfer, LCFUMB will issue an invoice in the amount of $70,393.17.
Upon receipt of payment, LCFUMB will provide an executed Transfer of Credit Certificate. Note that all
payments must be made with certified funds. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the credit
types and amounts requested are consistent with the compensatory mitigation requirements of the permit(s)
issued. LCFUMB and/or its agents are not responsible for determining the applicant's mitigation
requirements. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at
[phone] or by email at christian.preziosi@davey•com
Sincerely,
Davey Resource Group Inc. (agent for LCFUMB)
Christian Preziosi
Principal Consultant