20190752 Ver 6_2022 Baseline Wetland Monitoring Report_20230131

Geosyntec"
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
2022 Baseline Wetland Monitoring Report
Chemours Fayetteville Works Project
Bladen/Cumberland County, North Carolina
Prepared for
The Chemours Company FC, LLC
22828 NC Highway 87
Fayetteville, NC 28306
Prepared by
Geosyntec Consultants ofNC PC
2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430
Raleigh, NC 2 760 7
Project Number TR0795C
January 31, 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction...........................................................................................................................1
1.1 Performance Standards................................................................................................2
2. Desktop Review.....................................................................................................................3
3. Wetland Monitoring Methodology........................................................................................6
4. Findings.................................................................................................................................8
4.1 Existing Conditions......................................................................................................8
4.2 Baseline Monitoring - September 2022.......................................................................9
4.2.1 USACE Wetland and Upland Datapoints.....................................................9
4.2.2 NCWAM Form Monitoring Locations.......................................................10
4.2.3 Stream Monitoring Locations.....................................................................10
4.3 Future Monitoring......................................................................................................11
5. Summary and Discussion....................................................................................................12
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Rainfall at Fayetteville Area Weather Station
Table 2
Adjacent Groundwater Well Groundwater Elevation in Feet
Table 3
Wetlands and Their Associated Datapoints
Table 4
NCWAM Score for Each Wetland
Table 5
Streams Within the Wetland Investigation Area
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map (USGS Topographic Map)
Figure 2 Groundwater Gauge; Wetland, and Stream Monitoring Point Locations
Figure 3 Groundwater Well Location Map
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Wetland Data forms, NCWAM, and DWR Stream Forms
Appendix B Photographic Record
Appendix C Section 401 Monitoring Plan and Monitoring Plan Addendum
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 i January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
LIST OF APPENDICES CONT'D
Appendix D W.O. Huske Lock Gauge Height Data
Appendix E Antecedent Precipitation Tool Report
Appendix F Soil Profile Descriptions for Chemours Site: S&EC
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 ii January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
APT Antecedent Precipitation Tool
bgs below ground surface
Chemours Chemours Fayetteville Works
DWR Division of Water Resources
ft feet
Geosyntec Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.0
GPS
global positioning system
NCDEQ
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
NCWAM
North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method
NOAA
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NRCS
Natural Resource Conservation Service
PFAS
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
SWITC
Surface Water Identification and Certification
USGS
U.S. Geologic Survey
USACE
United States Army Corps of Engineers
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 iii January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
1. INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Chemours Fayetteville Works (Chemours), Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.,
(Geosyntec) conducted a baseline wetland monitoring assessment on a portion of Chemours'
Fayetteville Works property. Specifically, the assessment was conducted on a 137.6-acre portion
of Chemours property in Bladen and Cumberland Counties, North Carolina (Wetlands
Investigation Area). A field wetlands and waterbodies delineation of the Wetlands Investigation
Area was conducted by Geosyntec in September 2020, followed by a preliminary baseline
monitoring assessment conducted in October 2021 under a draft Wetland Monitoring Plan
submitted as part of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit on
August 5, 2021. In September 2022, the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ) approved a Wetland Monitoring Plan with Addendum. Geosyntec then completed a
baseline monitoring assessment prior to the construction of a groundwater barrier wall and
extraction wells. The 2022 monitoring assessment is described herein and the 2022 data will be
considered the baseline assessment moving forward.
The Wetlands Investigation Area is located in southern Cumberland and northern Bladen County,
approximately 10 miles south of the town of Fayetteville (Figure 1), wholly within the Chemours
Fayetteville Site property. The north boundary of the Wetlands Investigation Area begins along
the southern edge of Willis Creek and the Wetlands Investigation Area continues south, bounded
on the east by the Cape Fear River, on the west by Chemours' Fayetteville Works facility, and on
the south by Glengerry Road/Bill Hall Road. Current land use includes woodlands, industrial
facilities, on -going remediation projects, and access roads. Since 2020 an area of forest has been
cleared for the boundary road and construction area directly west of the Wetlands Investigation
Area. This expanded footprint supports movement of heavy equipment and vehicular traffic; and
includes the construction of groundwater monitoring wells, in ground utilities, and regrading of
soil.
The 137.6-acre Wetlands Investigation Area (Figure 2) is composed of mixed hardwood/pine
forest habitat, monitoring wells, a water pumping facility, and several access roads. Forested
habitat within the investigation area is primarily mid- to late successional which appears to have
naturally regenerated on the Wetlands Investigation Area following historic logging activities.
The baseline assessment was conducted to further characterize wetlands in the vicinity of the
proposed project to provide for future measure of potential future wetland impacts, should the
implementation of the barrier wall result in unanticipated hydrologic modifications to the wetlands
identified in the September 2020 wetland delineation. The assessment focused on a detailed
characterization of the wetlands previously identified in the Project Area by Geosyntec
(Appendix C).
On August 25, 2022 the NCDEQ issued comments related to original Wetland Monitoring Plan
and the Wetland Monitoring Plan Addendum was developed and subsequently approved by the
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 1 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
NCDEQ on September 16, 2022. Additional monitoring scope incorporated into the Addendum
includes updating the data utilized to evaluate the Performance Standards to include the following:
• Monitoring of groundwater elevations within wetlands through the installation of
gauges.
• Collection of North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM) forms for each
wetland, bi-annual completion of Division of Water Resources (DWR) stream forms
pursuant to the "North Carolina Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and their Origins, Version 4.11" for each stream with additional
forms for the stream reaches upgradient of the barrier wall.
• The addition of nine USACE Wetland Routine Data Form plots.
• Increasing the duration of the monitoring period to 5 years.
Monitoring events will be conducted for 5 years following implementation of the barrier wall,
consistent with the permit modification request submitted to the USACE by GEOServices, LLC
on February 9, 2022 and the addendum to NCDEQ revised on September 15, 2022. If the
performance standards defined below are met after 5 years, Chemours will coordinate with the
USACE and request to be released from further monitoring requirements. Post -construction
monitoring will focus on changes (if any) in hydrology and its effects to the wetland habitats within
the Wetlands Investigation Area while also assessing the areal extent of the wetlands and overall
functionality of the wetland habitat.
1.1 Performance Standards
The performance standards for this monitoring plan are as follows:
1. No non -wetland determinations at assigned wetland monitoring point during the
monitoring period. Specifically, the USACE Routine Wetland Data Forms collected at
each wetland monitoring point will be required to satisfy the three wetland parameters
(hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils).
2. Maintain an average areal extent of 90 percent of the delineated wetland boundaries, as
tabulated by acres unit measurement, following five years of monitoring.
3. Groundwater gauge data shall indicate groundwater within 12 inches (1 feet [ft or `])
of soil surface to meet the USACE primary hydrology indicator for high water table for
at least 5% hydroperiod (12.15 consecutive days) each year during the growing season.
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 2 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
2. DESKTOP REVIEW
An office desktop review was conducted to compile reference materials on climatic and hydraulic
conditions at the Wetlands Investigation Area in coordination with the monitoring event, as
climatic events (droughts, floods, etc.) can often impact qualitative wetland characteristics. Data
from the National Weather Service's Fayetteville Area, NC climate station located approximately
10 miles north of the project area, U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) drought monitor, the nearest
USGS river gauge for the Cape Fear River at the W.O. Huske Dam (Station ID 02105500)
(Appendix D), the USACE's Antecedent Precipitation Tool (APT) (Appendix E), and available
groundwater wells were assessed for the 2022 field efforts.
The 2022 baseline field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period
in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the month and year,
summarized in Table I below using data from the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC
Climate Station. The rainfall events prior to the field surveys recorded 0.6" and 0.32" on September
10 and 11, respectively. Considering the slightly lower than normal total rainfall recorded for the
year and month to date periods, Geosyntec delineators observed surface hydrology to be normal
with no stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology. No high-water, flooding
conditions were observed within the Cape Fear River or its tributaries. A review of regional
drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated DO - Abnormally Dry intensity
rating existed for the regional area for the weeks ending September 13 and 20, 2022.
Table 1 Rainfall at Fayetteville Area Weather Station
Year IPW
Parametd= Normalqp Observed 1
2022
_A
Rainfall (Month to Date) 2.44" 1.81" -0.63"
2022
Rainfall (Year to Date) 35.33" 28.48" -6.85"
Furthermore, based on the results of the climate analysis using the APT (Deter, USACE v.1.0.13)
the calculated output for the project area was experiencing "normal conditions - 11" value for
September 14, 2022 with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the
30-year normal range (see attached graphic in Appendix E). Site -specific hydrology conditions for
each wetland are discussed in further detail on each wetland data form (Appendix A).
Five of the groundwater wells previously installed by Chemours exist within or directly adjacent
to delineated wetlands with depths to groundwater measured on July 1, 2022 before the field
surveys and again on November 10, 2022 following the surveys. Groundwater elevation at these
wells is shown below in Table 2. LTW Groundwater levels were recorded quarterly in 2022 and
July and November were the closest records in relation to the wetlands (Table 2). Given the normal
climatic conditions indicated by the APT results above, these elevations likely represent baseline
conditions within the Wetlands Investigation Area. The locations of these wells are shown in
Figure 3.
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 3 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
Table 2 Adjacent Groundwater Well Groundwater Elevation in Feet (NAVD88)
LTW-01
July 2022 MbL
35.69
NovemberVell I
35.86
LTW-05
41.20
41.29
PIW-3D
33.50
35.64
PIW-4D
43.48
43.57
PIW-8D
41.23
41.31
The Cape Fear River at W.O. Huske Lock measured between 29-30 ft (NAD83) during the time
of field 2022 surveys, 9-10' below flood stage. The most recent high-water crests were 41.24',
47.32', 39.17', 38.71', and 47.27' all between January and March 2021. The NOAA data at the
W.O. Huske Lock states minor flood stage begins at 37.97' and that the adjacent lowlands begin
to flood at 40.97'. During the field event the river was 9' below flood stage and 12' below where
"Flood waters will affect lowlands" as defined by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA)1, and therefore at least 12' lower in elevation than our survey area. Based
on these values, the Cape Fear River water levels did not appear to be influencing groundwater
levels at the time of measurement and therefore the levels reflected by the on -site wells are
reflective of normal conditions. USGS gauge height for the Cape Fear River at W.O. Huske Lock
are documented in the exhibit below.
16
14
4J
a�
a�
t+ 12
ti
4J
=p 10
L �
4}
AO
L7 6
J
N 4
S
d
2
USGS 02105500 CAPE FEAR R AT HILM 0 HUSKE LOCK HR TARHEEL, HC
Now Jan Mar
2021 2022 2022
— daily nean gage height
Period of approved data
May Jul
2022 2022
Period of provisional data
1 https://water.weather.gov/ahps2/hydrograph.php?gage=stpn7&wfo=ilm
Sep
2022
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 4 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
Values in chart are reflective of feet above gauge base level of 28.06' NAVD88.
Based on the results of the 2022 Desktop Review, the climatic and hydrologic conditions for the
Wetlands Investigation Area were typical during the time of the field surveys.
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 5 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
3. WETLAND MONITORING METHODOLOGY
The baseline monitoring event was conducted by two experienced wetland biologists, that included
a certified Professional Wetland Scientist, from Geosyntec on September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022.
The event involved a quantitative assessment using the USACE Routine Wetland Data Form in
accordance with the "2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0" at each monitoring point and a
visual evaluation of the physiognomy state of the wetland and its surface hydrology. In addition,
the Wetlands Investigation Area was surveyed for indications of potential negative wetland plant
stressors (e.g., - lack of growth/vigor, mortality, upland/pioneer plant competition) not related to
natural climatic or storm -related damage. A global positioning system (GPS) receiver capable of
submeter accuracy was used for navigating the perimeter of the wetland boundaries and for
collecting field data, per the USACE standard operating procedures.
Fourteen locations, corresponding with the existing USACE Wetland Routine Data Form plots
completed during the 2020 wetland delineation (7 wetland, 7 upland), were revisited. In addition,
nine new sample plots were added to characterize the upgradient/downgradient conditions along
the fringe of each wetland by collecting supplemental datapoints using the USACE methodology.
A licensed soil scientist conducted an independent soils assessment at each of the data points
during the 2022 baseline characterization. The soils assessment is described in a technical memo
provided as Appendix F. The soils assessment verified the presence of hydric soils indicators at
each wetland datapoint.
Photographs were taken at each monitoring plot in each cardinal direction, along with a photo of
the soil profile. At datapoints collected during the September 2020 wetland delineation, previously
completed USACE datasheets were evaluated against conditions observed during the baseline data
collection effort and updated as necessary. For example, several datapoint locations were found
to have been flooded as a result of the construction of flow -through cells to remove Per- and
polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from surface water. These, and other examples of changes,
are further discussed in Section 4.2.1.
NCWAM forms were completed at a central location within each of the 7 wetlands in accordance
with the NCWAM User Manual. These forms characterize each wetland and can potentially allow
for earlier detection of more minute changes, specifically to species composition and the
condition/health of vegetation. The purpose of the NCWAM form is to provide an accurate,
consistent, rapid, observational, and scientifically based field method to determine the level of
function of a wetland relative to reference conditions for each wetland type in North Carolina.
NCWAM forms are not used to determine wetland/upland status or USACE jurisdictional status.
Stream determinations in North Carolina are made using the standardized "Methodology for
Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins" utilizing the DWR Stream
Identification Forms. Forms were completed for each of the 10 streams within the Wetland
Investigation Area by a Geosyntec biologist who has completed a Surface Water Identification and
Certification (SWITC) course. An additional stream monitoring form was completed at Streams 4,
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 6 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
5, 7, and 8 where they occur west of the barrier wall and thus have a portion of their reach that is
upgradient of the impacted area, meaning these longer streams will have two stream forms
completed per survey period.
To monitor for immediate changes in surface hydrology that might not be detected by changes in
soil and vegetation, five pairs of wetland groundwater gauges (Infinity pressure water level data
loggers by Infinities USA) were installed in September 2022 to a minimum depth of 15 inches
below surface using USACE technical specifications outlined in the June 2005 "Technical
Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites, ERDC TN-WRAP-05-2". Each
pair consists of one gauge within the wetland, and one within the upland nearby for comparison of
water tables. These gauges will be operated in accordance with the approved Monitoring Plan and
Addendum for evaluation of Performance Standard 93 to record groundwater within 12 inches for
at least 5% of the growing season.
The same monitoring plots, NCWAM locations, and photo points will be used during each
subsequent post -construction monitoring events to evaluate changes to surface hydrology
conditions and/or any response in the characteristics of the wetland habitats. DWR stream forms
will be completed at the same locations bi-annually, once during the beginning of the growing
season and once prior to the end of the growing season. The location of each monitoring point is
identified in Figure 2. Groundwater gauge data will be examined in a tabular format and the longest
period of groundwater within 12" of the soil surface during the growing season
(16 March - 14 November), based on the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) Bladen
County Soil, will be reported for each gauge for the purposes of this study. Each of the wetland
gauges must meet a minimum hydroperiod as described in the Performance Standard in
Section 1.1.
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 7 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
4. FINDINGS
4.1 Existing Conditions
Seven wetlands were previously delineated within the Wetlands Investigation Area downgradient
and east of the barrier wall construction area, above the Cape Fear River or Willis Creek. The
datapoints and their respective wetlands they represent are presented below in Table 3.
Table 3 Wetlands and Their Associated Datapoints
and#
&Type
DatapointWe
1
Wetland
Status
Wetland
Hydric
Vegetation
Y
Hydric
IHydrology
Y
Wetland
Y
I INotes
No changes
W1 PFO
lU
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
2
Upland
Y
N
N
No changes
3
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
W2 PFO
3U
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
4
Upland
Y
N
N
No change
5
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
Moved slightly upgradient due
to inundation from flow through
cell
W3 PFO
5U
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
Moved location slightly to better
document hydric soil
5U2
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
5U3
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No change
6
Upland
Y
N
N
No change
W4 PFO
7
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
Moved slightly upgradient due
to inundation from flow through
cell
8
Upland
Y
N
N
No changes
9
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
W6 PEM
9U
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
10
Upland
N
N
N
No longer exists, buried by road.
11D
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
W6 PFO
11
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
12
Upland
Y
N
N
No changes
W7-PFO
13D
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
within
13
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
Willis
13U
Wetland
Y
Y
Y
No changes
Creek
OHWM
14
Upland
N
N
N
No changes
Notes:
PFO — Palustrine Forested Wetland
PEM — Palustrine Emergent Wetland
OU — supplemental datapoint that is upgradient of original datapoint
OD — supplemental datapoint that is downgradient of original datapoint
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 8 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
Eleven streams including the western bank of the Cape Fear River were previously delineated with
the Wetlands Investigation Area. For monitoring purposes, the Cape Fear River has been excluded
as activities on the site are not anticipated to impact river hydrology. Each of the streams was
classified using an NCDEQ 4.11 stream form in 2020. All scored as Perennial except for
Stream 10, which scored Intermittent -ephemeral.
4.2 Baseline Monitoring - September 2022
This section describes the results of data collection conducted in the September 2022 baseline
monitoring effort. Geosyntec documented conditions observed during the assessments at:
• The 23 established USACE wetland and upland datapoints2.
• Seven NCWAM form monitoring locations.
• Each stream utilizing DWR stream forms.
Additionally, Geosyntec collected initial groundwater data from the recently installed groundwater
gauges (Appendix A and B). The findings of these observations are described in the following sub-
sections and discussed in Section 5.
4.2.1 USACE Wetland and Upland Datapoints
The datapoints identified during the September 2020 wetland delineation were revisited during
this effort, along with supplemental datapoints further described below. Site conditions were
observed to have been changed in the general vicinity between the 2020 delineation and the 2022
baseline survey at Datapoints 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 13. Examples of these changes include
tree removal, construction of flow -through cells to remove PFAS from surface water discharging
to the Cape Fear River at Seeps A,B,C, and D, and associated access roads improvement. A
significant site condition change was noted at the upland Datapoint 10, where the area around the
datapoint was modified by the construction of a gravel road authorized by USACE permit
SAW-2019-00296. Since the 2020 delineation Datapoints 5 and 7 were relocated slightly due to
inundation of water associated with construction of the flow -through cells.
Supplemental datapoints were obtained for Datapoints 1, 3, 5, 9, 11, and 13. These supplemental
datapoints were collected to increase the ability to detect changes following the construction of the
barrier wall. Specifically, these supplemental datapoints will potentially allow detection of acute
changes to the vegetation, soils, or hydrology for each wetland; as well as add to the overall
understanding of the surface hydrology within the Wetlands Investigation Area. Supplemental
datapoint locations are identified in Figures 2a-c.
2 The upland datapoint 10 is now located where a road has been placed and will be
removed from future monitoring efforts, and subsequent monitoring will only include
22 USACE datapoints.
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 9 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
Observations of soil characteristics at each datapoint remained consistent with previous conditions.
A licensed soil scientist accompanied crews on the monitoring effort and confirmed observations
by Geosyntec (Appendix F).
Original and supplemental wetland datapoints meet the three criteria for classification as a wetland,
as defined by USACE in Section 3 of this report.
4.2.2 NCWAM Form Monitoring Locations
A location was chosen within the central area of each of the seven wetlands to complete an
NCWAM form to represent the baseline conditions of each wetland. The NCWAM score of each
wetland is outlined in Table 4. The NCWAM score is generated from the values for each wetland
component (hydrology, water quality, and habitat) relative to wetlands of the same type. Results
for each component and sub -component are further detailed in Appendix A.
Table 4 NCWAM Score for Each Wetland
Wetland
Wetland I (WI)
Type
PFO
2022 NCWAM Score
Low
Wetland 2 (W2)
PFO
High
Wetland 3 (W3)
PFO
High
Wetland 4 (W4)
PFO
Medium
Wetland 6 (W6)
PEM
High
Wetland 6 (W6)
PFO
Medium
Wetland 7 (W7)
PFO
High
Notes:
*NCWAM scores indicate the overall function of a wetland relative to wetlands of the same type in North
Carolina. A high score indicates the wetland is functioning near reference conditions, low indicates not near
reference function.
4.2.3 Stream Monitoring Locations
The locations of the original stream monitoring points from the 2020 delineation were revisited
for the 2022 baseline monitoring effort, along with adding four additional monitoring points along
stream reaches upgradient of the barrier wall disturbance. The scores of each of the streams is
documented in Table 5. Streams that score below 19 are classified as ephemeral, between 19 and
30 are classified as intermittent, and above 30 are classified as perennial.
It should be noted, as described in the "Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins" a stream's origin, as defined by its flow regimes (e.g. —
ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial), usually occurs along transition zones in which the location
and length of the zone is subject to fluctuations in groundwater levels and precipitation. As such,
it can be expected that stream scores will fluctuate between monitoring events.
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 10 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
Table 5 Streams Within the Wetland Investigation Area
IdentificationStream
Stream 1
Perennial
31.5
Stream 2
Perennial
32
Stream 3
Perennial
30.5
Stream 4
Perennial
41.5
Stream 4- Upgradient
Perennial
36.5
Stream 5
Perennial
34.75
Stream 5- Upgradient
Intermittent
20
Stream 5T
Perennial
47
Stream 6
Intermittent
25.5
Stream 7
Perennial
43
Stream 7- Upgradient
Perennial
30
Stream 8
Perennial
33
Stream 8- Upgradient
Perennial
31.5
Stream 9 (Willis Creek)
Perennial
49.5
Stream 10
Intermittent -Ephemeral
11
Stream 11 (Cape Fear River)
Perennial
56.5
4.3 Future Monitoring
Following construction of the barrier wall, Chemours will conduct five post -construction annual
monitoring events. Year one post construction monitoring is tentatively proposed for September
2023. Each of the 23 datapoints, 14 stream monitoring points, and 7 NCWAM form locations will
be re -visited and surveyed/documented following the same methodology used in the baseline
survey. Groundwater gauge data will be collected daily using data loggers and downloaded
monthly. Data will be evaluated in the 2023 monitoring report against the hydroperiod criteria.
Additionally, stream monitoring locations must be visited twice during each growing season.
Stream monitoring points will be revisited in Spring and late summer of 2023, with data being
reported in the 2023 Year-1 monitoring report.
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 11 January 2023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
5. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
The September 2022 baseline monitoring was performed prior to the installation of the barrier
wall, to establish the baseline effort wetland and stream conditions of the Wetlands Investigation
Area. This monitoring program will run for 5 years after the wall is installed to evaluated potential
changes that may occur in wetlands and streams downgradient of the construction. This baseline
monitoring scope included USACE wetland datapoint monitoring, NCWAM form data collection,
DWR Stream form collection, and the installation of groundwater gauges. No significant
deviations in wetland composition or size were documented during this baseline characterization
effort. Since this 2022 Report is the baseline, no evaluation against the Performance Standards was
performed.
Four recently constructed flow -through cells authorized under USACE permit SAW-2019-00296
appear to have contributed to increases in observed wetland hydrology and slight alterations in
canopy cover within wetlands on -site. These changes are detailed in Table 3 and Appendix A; and
documented in the representative photographs (Appendix B). These alterations should be
considered part of the baseline conditions for future comparison.
Monitoring will occur in 2023 consistent with the scope described in Section 4.3.
TR0795C —Baseline wetland Monitoring Report-2022 12 January 2023

Figures

lza
Tranquility Rd
K
149 ft
O Fayetteville
I
Lumberton
748 ft
Clln
701 N
0 15 JJJ
87 Miles
jackle Hood Ln
m
n
=
4
v
'tc
N
_=
ry
A
a
ro
n
A
Ie
ro
1
0
0.35
Miles
Site Location Map
Wetland Monitoring Report - 2022
Chemours Fayetteville Works
Cumberland/Bladen County, North Carolina
GeosynteC"' }nii.cLnnsd[antgofKC.,P.(. Figure
INC Li=e No.: C-951111 and is 2J.
consultants
1
Raleigh, NC January 2023

'#a�u` � j � • r
�.ALiz. x
Legend Groundwater Gauge; Wetland and Stream
Stream Monitoring Point Delineated Features Monitoring Point Locations
0 Final GW Gauge Locations
®Ordinary High Water Mark N Wetland Monitoring Report - 2022
0 Wetlands Investigation Area Palustrine Emergent Wetland Chemours Fayetteville Works
W Exclusion Areas ® Palustrine Forested Wetland Cumberland/Bladen County, North Carolina
Datapoint Location Q
0 2020 Upland DP I Geosyntec s;41vcco�y«icancsofKc,P.4 Figure
0 2020 Wetland DP J GOI]SLi1taY1[S INC Licenu Nu-, C-5500 and C: '31
0 2021 Additional Wetland DP 0 700 2
Feet Raleigh, NC January 2023

A'II"' 741'.////i M
r iz�ti.
Legend Groundwater Gauge; Wetland and Stream
Stream Monitoring Point Delineated Features Monitoring Point Locations
0 Final GW Gauge Locations
®Ordinary High Water Mark N Wetland Monitoring Report - 2022
0 Wetlands Investigation Area Palustrine Emergent Wetland Chemours Fayetteville Works
W Exclusion Areas ® Palustrine Forested Wetland Cumberland/Bladen County, North Carolina
Datapoint Location Q
0 2020 Upland DP I Geosyntec •,i,+)41vccoasultantsnrnC„eC Figure
0 2020 Wetland DP J GOI]SLi1taY1[S INC Licens Nu-,C-5500 and
0 2021 Additional Wetland DP 0 320 2B
Feet Raleigh, NC January 2023

t�
_ d
- I
i
Legend Groundwater Gauge; Wetland and Stream
Stream Monitoring Point Delineated Features Monitoring Point Locations
0 Final GW Gauge Locations
®Ordinary High Water Mark N Wetland Monitoring Report - 2022
0 Wetlands Investigation Area Palustrine Emergent Wetland Chemours Fayetteville Works
W Exclusion Areas ® Palustrine Forested Wetland Cumberland/Bladen County, North Carolina
Datapoint Location Q
0 2020Upland DP I Geosyntec �I• coFqultaFxsofKc,Pc Figure
0 2020 Wetland DP J consultantsconsultantsINC Licens Nu-,C-5500 and is 2SlJ
0 2021 Additional Wetland DP 0 320 2C
Feet r Raleigh, NC January 2023

�r
Jr
'y
f
,
Legend
O
X_71�j
I.- . pi..0
:.
i 't' t J* r , . -6,
Mir b }. t
_rtLILA
O Well Locations Groundwater Well Location Map
0 Wetlands Investigation Area N Wetland Monitoring Report - 2022
® Exclusion Areas Chemours Fayetteville Works
Cumberland/Bladen County, North Carolina
Delineated Features Q
ILeos tec �.�,��„n����ro�y�dca�Lsorxr„r� Figure
®Ordinary High Water Mark J INC License Nu-,C-5500 and C:'31
Palustrine Emergent Wetland consultants
o 700 3
® Palustrine Forested Wetland Feet Raleigh, NC January 2023

Appendix A
Wetland Data forms, NCWAM, and
DWR Stream Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP01
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 2-10 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8371110 Long.-78.824054 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with a perennial seep discharge zone in the floodplain of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
I Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
X
I Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
X
Saturation A3
X
I Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks (131)
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X
Sediment Deposits (132)
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
Shallow seep head associated with a backwater floodplain of the Cape Fear River. Perennial seep is the primary hydrology. A lot of slash debris from windstorms.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point I DP01
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Taxodium dishchum
35 Y
OBL
2.
Acer negundo
15 Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
50 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 25
20 k of Total Cover:
10
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
OBL species 145 x 1 145
1.
Acerrubrum
25 Y
FAC
FACW species 15 x 2 30
2.
Taxodium dishchum
10 Y
OBL
FAC species 45 x 3 135
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 205 (A) 310 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.5 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
35 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 17.5
20 k of Total Cover:
7
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Leersia oryzoides
70 Y
OBL
2.
Abdolgaardia ovata
15 N
FACW
3.
Rotala ramosior
15 N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Sagittaria calycina 10 N OBL
5.
Persicaria amphibia
5 N
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
115 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 57.5 20 k of Total Cover: 23
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Campsis radicans
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 2.5
20 k of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP01
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
k
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-5
10YR 4/2
93
7.5YR 4/6
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
5-14
10YR 4/1
98
7.5YR 4/6
2
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ***
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP02
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope k: 2-10 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8372530 Long.-78.823952 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the wetland, adjacent to the high bank of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point 1 DP02
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Celtis laevigata
45
Y
FACW
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
N
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 9 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
105 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 52.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
21
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Ilex decidua
35
Y
FACW
FACW species 105 x 2 210
2.
Acernegundo
30
Y
FAC
FAC species 150 x 3 450
3.
Ilex opaca
15
N
FAC
FACU species 15 x 4 60
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 270 (A) 720 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.7 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
80
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 40
20 k
of Total Cover:
16
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum
Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
30
Y
FAC
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
20
Y
FAC
3.
Arundinaria gigantea
10
N
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Ligustrum sinense 5 N FAC
5.
Rubus trivialts
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
70
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 35 20 k of Total Cover: 14
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
Smilax auriculata
5
Y
FACU
4.
5.
15
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 7.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
3
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP02
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/3
100
Loam / Clay
6-13
7.5YR 4/4
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ***
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP03
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8392840 Long.-78.824923 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with an area with multiple perennial hillslope seepheads within the floodplain of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
I Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
Shallow exposed roots on many trees. Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
11
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
\TION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Absolute
Dominant
atum Plots ize r= 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
Acer rubrum
60
Y
FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Y
FAC
Betula nigra
20
N
FACW
Taxodium dishchum
20
N
OBL
130 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 65
20 k of Total Cover:
26
Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
Acer rubrum
30
Y
F
Liquidambar styraciflua
25
Y
F
= Total Cover
55
50 k of total Cover: 27.5
20 k of Total Cover:
11
atum Plots ize r- 30'
Microstegium vimineum
30
Y
F
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
30
Y
F
Carex cherokeensts
20
N
Ff
Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
20
N
Ff
Elymus virginicus
15
N
F
115 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 57.5
20 k of Total Cover:
23
fine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
Gelsemium sempervirens
10
Y
F
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
F
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Y
F
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Y
R
25
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 12.5
20 k of Total Cover:
5
s: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Sampling Point: DP03
Dominance Test Worksheet
Number of dominant species that are
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total number of dominant species
across all strata: 10 (B)
Percent of dominant species that are
Prevalence Index Worksheet
OBL species
20
x 1
20
FACW species
60
x 2
120
FAC species
240
x 3
720
FACU species
5
x 4
20
UPL species
0
x 5
0
Column Total
325
(A)
880 (B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP03
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/2
100
Loam / Clay
6-14
10YR 5/1
93
10YR 4/6
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP04
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope k: 2-10 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8393880 Long.-78.825161 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Wickham fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point 1 DP04
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Quercus laurifolia
40
Y
FACW
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carya glabra
25
N
FACU
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Acer rubrum
20
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
Carpinus caroliniana
15
N
FAC
across all strata: 9 (B)
6.
Quercus falcata
15
N
FACU
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
150 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 75
20 k
of Total Cover:
30
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Y
FAC
FACW species 40 x 2 80
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 177 x 3 531
3.
FACU species 70 x 4 280
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 287 (A) 891 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.1 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
40
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 20
20 k
of Total Cover:
8
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
35
Y
FAC
2.
Microstegium vimineum
20
Y
FAC
3.
Callicarpa americana
20
Y
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 N FAC
5.
Lonicera japonica
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
85
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 42.5 20 k of Total Cover: 17
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
7
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Smilax auriculata
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
12
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 6
20 k
of Total Cover:
2.4
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP04
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-14
10YR 4/2
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ***
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP05
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8423690 Long.-78.824866 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland at the confluence of multiple perennial seeps/tributaries within the floodplain of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
I Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits B15 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
X
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns B10
X
Water Marks (B1)
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
X
Sediment Deposits (B2)
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X
Drift Deposits (B3)
X
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
magery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 8
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: DP05
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25
Y
FACW
2.
Taxodium dishchum
20
Y
OBL
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Acer negundo
5
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 7 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
60 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 30
20 k
of Total Cover:
12
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 65 x 1 65
1.
Ilex decidua
30
Y
FACW
FACW species 105 x 2 210
2.
FAC species 30 x 3 90
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 200 (A) 365 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.8 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
30
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 15
20 k
of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Persicaria hydropiperoides
30
Y
OBL
2.
Carex vulopia
30
Y
FACW
3.
Saururus cernuus
15
N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Carex cherokeensts 10 N FACW
5.
Microstegium vimineum
5
N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6.
Rubus argutus
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Pluchea camphorata
5
N
FACW
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
100
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 50 20 k of Total Cover: 20
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Rubus hispidus
5
Y
FACW
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 5
20 k
of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
A large cypress has fallen over green ash trees
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP05
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
k
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-7
10YR 4/2
93
7.5YR 4/6
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
7-15
5YR 4/2
93
7.5YR 4/6
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP06
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8424850 Long.-78.825086 Datum. WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland. Clearing for flow through cell 15' to south has opened up canopy edge.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: DP06
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Quercus falcata
40
Y
FACU
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Acer negundo
5
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 10 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 70 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
75 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 37.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
15
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Acernegundo
10
Y
FAC
FACW species 5 x 2 10
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
5
Y
FAC
FAC species 110 x 3 330
3.
Ilex opaca
5
Y
FAC
FACU species 60 x 4 240
4.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
Y
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Aesculus glabra
5
Y
FACU
Column Total 175 (A) 580 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.3 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
30
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 15
20 k
of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum
Plots ize r= 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
40
Y
FAC
2.
Elymus villosus
5
N
FACU
3.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
5
N
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Carex grayi 5 N FACW
5.
Rubus trivialts
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
60
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 30 20 k of Total Cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 5
20 k
of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP06
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-16
10YR 4/4
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP07
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8448730 Long.-78.82616 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with an area with multiple perennial hillslope seepheads within the floodplain of the Cape Fear River.
Standing water due to flow through cell construction.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
Surface Water Al
X
JAquatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
X
Saturation A3
X
I Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks (131)
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 12
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
Primary hydrology is perennially flowing seep head donminated with nature cypress. Confluence of 5 seep heads is the primary hydrology.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
11
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
\TION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Absolute
Dominant
atum Plots ize r= 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
Taxodium dishchum
65
Y
OBL
Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Acer rubrum
25
N
FAC
Carpinus caroliniana
15
N
FAC
140
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover:
70
20 k of Total Cover:
28
Shrub Stratum Plots ize
r= 30'
Carpinus caroliniana
20
Y
F
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Y
F
25
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover:
12.5
20 k of Total Cover:
5
atum Plots ize
r- 30'
Carex cherokeensts
27.5
Y
Ff
Onoclea sensibilis
10
Y
Ff
Saururus cernuus
7.5
N
Dryoptens carthusiana
7.5
N
Ff
Ligustrum sinense
2.5
N
F
Acer rubrum
2.5
N
F
= Total Cover
57.5
50 k of total Cover:
28.75
20 k of Total Cover:
11.5
fine Stratum Plot size:
r= 30'
Smilax laurdolia
10
Y
Fi
10
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover:
5
20 k of Total Cover:
2
s: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below)
I roots
Sampling Point: DP07
Dominance Test Worksheet
Number of dominant species that are
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total number of dominant species
across all strata: 7 (B)
Percent of dominant species that are
Prevalence Index Worksheet
OBL species 72.5 x 1 72.5
FACW species 55 x 2 110
FAC species 105 x 3 315
FACU species 0 x 4 0
UPL species 0 x 5 0
Column Total 232.5 (A) 497.5 (B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP07
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
k
Type`
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
0-12
10YR 4/1
95
10YR 3/4
5
C
M
Mucky Loam / Clay
`Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Standing water 12" deep, soils not sampled at same location, assumed hydric.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP08
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8450810 Long.-78.826096 Datum. WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: DP08
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Celtis laevigata
65
Y
FACW
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
40
Y
FACW
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
4.
Quercus rubra
15
N
FACU
Total number of dominant species
5.
Ulmus alata
10
N
FACU
across all strata: 9 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 89 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
160 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 80
20 k
of Total Cover:
32
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Aesculus glabra
25
Y
FACU
FACW species 110 x 2 220
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 130 x 3 390
3.
Ligustrum sinense
5
N
FAC
FACU species 65 x 4 260
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 305 (A) 870 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.9 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
40
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 20
20 k
of Total Cover:
8
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Elymus virginicus
45
Y
FAC
2.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
25
Y
FAC
3.
Solanum carolinense
10
N
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Ligustrum sinense 5 N FAC
5.
Lonicera japonica
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
90
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 45 20 k of Total Cover: 18
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Smilax bona-nox
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Smilax laurdolia
5
Y
FACW
Yes X No
3.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
4.
5.
15
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 7.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
3
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP08
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/3
100
Loam / Clay
6-14
10YR 4/6
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ***
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP09
Investigator(s): N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flats Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8456050 Long.-78.82588 Datum. WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Chastain soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation X ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located in a herbaceous wetland along a depressional floodplain valley of the Cape Fear River. Trees were recently harvested.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: DP09
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
2.
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
0 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 0
20 k
of Total Cover:
0
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 31.5 x 1 31.5
1.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
Y
FAC
FACW species 32.5 x 2 65
2.
Acernegundo
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 37.5 x 3 112.5
3.
Ligustrum sinense
5
N
FAC
FACU species 49 x 4 196
4.
Platanus occidentalis
5
N
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Cephalanthus occidentalis
2
N
OBL
Column Total 150.5 (A) 405 (B)
6.
Salix nigra
2
N
OBL
Prevalence Index: 2.7 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
34
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 17
20 k
of Total Cover:
6.8
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Perilla frutescens
40
Y
FACU
2.
Persicaria pensylvanica
17.5
Y
FACW
3.
Cyperus erythrorhizos
15
N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Juncus effusus 12.5 N OBL
5.
Andropogon glaucopsis
10
N
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6.
Ligustrum sinense
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Perilla frutescens
2.5
N
FACU
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8.
Liquidambar styraciflua
2.5
N
FAC
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Eupatortum capillifoltum
1.5
N
FACU
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
106.5
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 53.25 20 k of Total Cover: 21.3
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Y
FACU
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Fagopyrum esculentum
5
Y
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 5
20 k
of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Trees were recently harvested. By 2022 some shrubs had established themselves. No indicator status for Fagopyrum esculentum, created listing in NWP and called
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP09
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-2
10YR 4/3
100
Loam / Clay
2-12
2.5YR 5/2
78
2.5YR 5/4
7
C
PI
Loam / Clay
2-12
7.5YR 5/6
15
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ***
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/15/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP11
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8482360 Long.-78.827111 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with an area with multiple perennial hillslope seepheads within the floodplain of the Cape Fear River.
Streaming becomes braided with much surface alluvial sand deposits.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
X
JAquatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
X
I Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
Primary hydrology is seepheads and a high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point I DP11
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Taxodium dishchum
50
Y
OBL
2.
Acer rubrum
45
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Betula nigra
15
N
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
110 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 55
20 k
of Total Cover:
22
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
OBL species 60 x 1 60
1.
Acerrubrum
20
Y
FAC
FACW species 60 x 2 120
2.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 158 x 3 474
3.
FACU species 5 x 4 20
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 283 (A) 674 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.4 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
30
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 15
20 k
of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
50
Y
FAC
2.
Arundinaria gigantea
30
Y
FACW
3.
Urtica dioica
20
N
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Juncus effusus 10 N OBL
5.
Pluchea camphorata
10
N
FACW
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6.
Acer rubrum
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Persicaria pensylvanica
5
N
FACW
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8.
Ulmus alata
5
N
FACU
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
N
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
140
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 70 20 k of Total Cover: 28
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
3
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
3
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 1.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
0.6
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP11
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-3
10YR 3/2
95
10YR 3/6
5
C
M
Loam / Clay
3-9
10YR 5/2
90
7.5YR 4/6
10
C
M
Sandy
Alluvial
9-15
10YR 4/2
90
7.5YR 3/6
10
C
M
Sandy
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ***
Histosol (Al)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
10ther (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
X
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (M LRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/15/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP12
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope k: 2-10 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8480490 Long.-78.827408 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point I DP12
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Quercus rubra
40
Y
FACU
2.
Pinus taeda
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
20
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
4.
Quercus nigra
10
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 12 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
105 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 52.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
21
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
10
Y
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 0
2.
Ilex opaca
5
Y
FAC
FAC species 120 x 3 360
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
Y
FAC
FACU species 50 x 4 200
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 170 (A) 560 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.3 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
20
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 10
20 k
of Total Cover:
4
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
5
Y
FAC
2.
Ilex opaca
5
Y
FAC
3.
Callicarpa americana
5
Y
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Microstegium vimineum 5 Y FAC
5.
Eupatortum capillifoltum
5
Y
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
25
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 12.5 20 k of Total Cover: 5
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
15
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
20
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 10
20 k
of Total Cover:
4
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Increase in Japanese stiftgrass.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP12
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 3/3
100
Sandy
6-16
10YR 5/4
100
Sandy
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ***
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 9/15/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP13
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8516350 Long.-78.828952 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse-Gilead loamy sands, 15 to 25 percent slopes NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within the fringe of the active channel of Willis Creek. Mature forested vegetation extends beyond bank as the area is influenced by backwater
flooding from the Cape Fear River confluence.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
Surface Water Al
X
JAquatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
X
Saturation A3
X
I Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks (131)
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
X
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
Primarily hydrology is high water table and flooding from Willis Creek.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: DP13
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Taxodium dishchum
70 Y
OBL
2.
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
70 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 35
20 k of Total Cover:
14
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 70 x 1 70
1.
Ilex decidua
25 Y
FACW
FACW species 45 x 2 90
2.
FAC species 25 x 3 75
3.
FACU species 5 x 4 20
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 145 (A) 255 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.8 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
25 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 12.5
20 k of Total Cover:
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
15 Y
FAC
2.
Panicum repens
10 Y
FACW
3.
Carex grayi
10 Y
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 N FAC
5.
Solanum carolinense
5 N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
45 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 22.5 20 k of Total Cover: 9
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 2.5
20 k of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP13
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
k
Color
k
Type`
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/2
80
7.5YR 3/4
20
C
M
Mucky Loam / Clay
6-14
Gley1 4/10y
93
2.5Y 6/4
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
`Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
X
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
X
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 9/15/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP14
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope k: 2-10 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8515270 Long.-78.829125 Datum. WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse-Gilead loamy sands, 15 to 25 percent slopes NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
10ther (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point I DP14
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Fagus grandifolia
60 Y
FACU
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
35 Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3. Carpinus caroliniana
10 N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
4. Nyssa sylvatica
5 N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 5 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
110 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 55
20 k of Total Cover:
22
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1. Carpinus caroliniana
35 Y
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 0
2.
FAC species 130 x 3 390
3.
FACU species 65 x 4 260
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 195 (A) 650 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.3 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
35 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 17.5
20 k of Total Cover:
7
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
25 Y
FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia
5 N
FAC
3. Vaccintum arboreum
5 N
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Ilex opaca 5 N FAC
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
40 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 20 20 k of Total Cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1. Vitis rotundifolia
10 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes No X
3.
4.
5.
10 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 5
20 k of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Adjacent canopy is more open with the construction of the barrier wall road.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP14
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-16
10YR 4/4
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ***
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours - Fayetteville Plant City/County: Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: Dplu
Investigator(s): A.Mathes, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): fringe Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 2-10 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat. 34.8373730 Long.-78.824708 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Wickham fine sandy loam, 1-6 k slopes NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located upgradient of the recently constructed flow-thru structure that is impounding water from the adjacent flowing seeps. Flow is to the east.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
I Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
I Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
X
Saturation A3
X
I Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X
Sediment Deposits (132)
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic). Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point I Dpl u
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Taxodium dishchum
50 Y
OBL
2. Betula nigra
20 Y
FACW
Number of dominant species that are
3. Acer rubrum
20 Y
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 10 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
90 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 45
20 k of Total Cover:
18
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
OBL species 55 x 1 55
1. Betula nigra
5 Y
FACW
FACW species 42 x 2 84
2. Liquidambarstyraciflua
5 Y
FAC
FAC species 30 x 3 90
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 127 (A) 229 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.8 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
10 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 5
20 k of Total Cover:
2
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
7 Y
FACW
2. Carex Cherokeensis
5 Y
FACW
3. Boehmeria cylindrica
5 Y
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Dichondra carolinensis 5 Y FAC
5. Woodwardia areolata
5 Y
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
27 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 13.5 20 k of Total Cover: 5.4
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 0
20 k of Total Cover:
0
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Mature forested habitat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: Dp1 u
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
k
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-7
2.5y5/3
93
7.5yr4/6
7
C
M
Sandy
6-12
10yr3/1
98
7.5yr4/4
2
C
M
Mucky Sand
12-14
Gley 3n
95
7.5yr3/4
5
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ***
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
X
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
X
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: yes
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Restrictive layer a shallow sandstone/clay layer>15"
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours - Fayetteville Plant City/County: Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: Dp3u
Investigator(s): A.Mathes, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat. 34.8400451 Long.-78.82497483 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located upgradient of DP03 in a mature forested wetland. Area is primarily saturated with little concentrated flow of surface water. Drainage is to the
south.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic). Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point I Dp3u
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Acer rubrum
50
Y
FAC
2.
Taxodium dishchum
30
Y
OBL
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Nyssa aquatica
20
N
OBL
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 8 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
110 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 55
20 k
of Total Cover:
22
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 50 x 1 50
1.
Acerrubrum
10
Y
FAC
FACW species 27 x 2 54
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
5
Y
FAC
FAC species 184 x 3 552
3.
Asimina triloba
5
Y
FAC
FACU species 5 x 4 20
4.
Quercus michauxii
2
N
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Carpinus caroliniana
2
N
FAC
Column Total 266 (A) 676 (B)
6.
Ulmus americana
2
N
FAC
Prevalence Index: 2.5 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
26
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 13
20 k
of Total Cover:
5.2
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
80
Y
FAC
2.
Elymus virginicus
10
N
FAC
3.
Cinna arundinacea
10
N
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Carex cherokeensts 5 N FACW
5.
Carex venusta
5
N
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6.
Boehmeria cylindrica
5
N
FACW
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
115
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 57.5 20 k of Total Cover: 23
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Campsis radicans
10
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Lonicera japonica
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
15
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 7.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
3
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Mature forested habitat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: Dp3u
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
k
Color
k
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-8
10yr4/2
98
10yr4/6
2
C
M
Loam / Clay
8-14
10yr4/2
95
10yr4/6
5
C
PI
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, 13)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours - Fayetteville Plant City/County: Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: Dp5u2
Investigator(s): A.Mathes, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat. 34.8433133 Long.-78.82587147 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located upgradient of DP05 in a mature forested wetland. Area is primarily saturated from several lateral seep heads and a stream that drains surface
water to the south.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
X
I Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic). Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: Dp5u2
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Acer rubrum
40
Y
FAC
2.
Betula nigra
25
Y
FACW
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 9 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 89 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
75 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 37.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
15
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 30 x 1 30
1.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
Y
FAC
FACW species 60 x 2 120
2.
Acerrubrum
15
Y
FAC
FAC species 107 x 3 321
3.
FACU species 10 x 4 40
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 207 (A) 511 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.5 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
30
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 15
20 k
of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Carex cherokeensis
15
Y
FACW
2.
Carex lacustris
15
Y
OBL
3.
Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
15
Y
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Saururus cernuus 15 Y OBL
5.
Elymus virginicus
10
N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6.
Boehmeria cylindrica
5
N
FACW
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
N
FAC
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8.
Ligustrum sinense
5
N
FAC
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Leptochloa virgata
5
N
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
90
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 45 20 k of Total Cover: 18
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
10
Y
FACU
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
2
N
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
12
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 6
20 k
of Total Cover:
2.4
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Mature forested habitat. Two large red mapls have fallen due to windlhrow.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: Dp5u2
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
k
Color
k
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-17
10yr5/1
75
7.5yr4/6
25
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
X
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours - Fayetteville Plant City/County: Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: Dp5u3
Investigator(s): A.Mathes, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat. 34.8440070 Long.-78.82585 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Chastain soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located upgradient of DP5U2 in a mature forested wetland. Area is primarily saturated by several lateral seepheads to the west. Flow in the valley is to
the south.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
X
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
X
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted October 4-6, 2021 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -to -date
(a -0.44" deficit from a 0.56" normal value) as of October 4. No rainfall had occured in the ten days prior to field surveys, but 1.32" fell on 9/22. Additional, 0.12"
rainfall occured overnight on 10/4, after that days surveys. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 33.19" which is a 2.71" shortfall according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the near normal total rainfall for the year and lack of recent rainfall, the delineators felt that
surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology. No high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of
regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the regional area for the week of October 4, 2021.
However, drought conditions were updated on October 8 following surveys and indicated the area to now be under "abnormally dry" conditions. Furthermore, based
on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool (Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output for the project area was experiencing
"normal conditions -11" value with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30 year normal range (see attached graphic). Primary
hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: Dp5u3
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Acer rubrum
60 Y
FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
30 Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20 N
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 5 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
110 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 55
20 k of Total Cover:
22
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 25 x 1 25
1. Acerrubrum
15 Y
FAC
FACW species 85 x 2 170
2.
FAC species 125 x 3 375
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 235 (A) 570 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.4 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
15 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 7.5
20 k of Total Cover:
3
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Diodia virginiana
55 Y
FACW
2. Saururus cernuus
25 Y
OBL
3. Carex cherokeensts
10 N
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 N FAC
5. Smilax rotundifolia
5 N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6. Elymus virginicus
5 N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
110 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 55 20 k of Total Cover: 22
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 0
20 k of Total Cover:
0
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Mature forested habitat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: Dp5u3
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
k
Color
k
Type`
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
0-15
10yr5/2
75
7.5yr4/6
25
C
PL,M
Mucky Loam / Clay
`Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
X
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works City/County: Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: Dp5u (new location)
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): basin Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T Lat. 34.8414285 Long.-78.82538538 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Wickham fine sandy loam, 1-6 k slopes NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits B15 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns B10
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic).
Primary hydrology is surface water flow.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point I Dp5u (new location)
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Nyssa sylvatica
50 Y
FAC
2. Acer negundo
20 Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
15 N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4. Carpinus caroliniana
10 N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 7 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
95 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 47.5
20 k of Total Cover:
19
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 5 x 1 5
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua
10 Y
FAC
FACW species 80 x 2 160
2. Ulmus americana
5 Y
FAC
FAC species 115 x 3 345
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 200 (A) 510 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.6 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
15 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 7.5
20 k of Total Cover:
3
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Carex cherokeensis
40 Y
FACW
2. Cinna arundinacea
30 Y
FACW
3. Boehmeria cylindrica
10 N
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Saururus cernuus 5 N OBL
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
85 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 42.5 20 k of Total Cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1. Vitis rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 2.5
20 k of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Grass photo, tree buttressing
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: Dp5u (new location)
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
k
Color
k
Type`
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
04
10yr5/2
95
5yr4/6
5
C
M
Loam / Clay
4-14
10yr4/2
80
5yr4/6
20
C
M, P
Loam / Clay
`Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, 13)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours - Fayetteville Plant City/County: Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: Dp9u
Investigator(s): A.Mathes, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat. 34.8461394 Long.-78.82626212 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Chastain soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located upgradient of DP09 in a mature forested wetland. Area is primarily saturated with several drainage streams that flow to the south.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic). Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point I Dp9u
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Acer rubrum
80 Y
FAC
2.
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
80 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 40
20 k of Total Cover:
16
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 5 x 1 5
1.
Acerrubrum
20 Y
FAC
FACW species 85 x 2 170
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
10 Y
FAC
FAC species 135 x 3 405
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 225 (A) 580 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.6 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
30 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 15
20 k of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Carex cherokeensis
40 Y
FACW
2.
Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
40 Y
FACW
3.
Elymus virginicus
15 N
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Boehmeria cylindrica 5 N FACW
5.
Ligustrum sinense
5 N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6.
Woodwardia areolata
5 N
OBL
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
110 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 55 20 k of Total Cover: 22
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Campsis radicans
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 2.5
20 k of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Mature forested habitat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: Dp9u
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
k
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10yr5/2
95
7.5yr4/6
5
C
M
Loam / Clay
7-14
10yr5/2
75
7.5yr4/6
25
C
PI,M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, 13)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Chemours - Fayetteville Plant
Chemours
City/County: Bladen Sampling Date:
stigator(s): A.Mathes, N. Weaver
dform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain
region (LRR or MLRA): P Lat. _
Map Unit Name: Dystrochrept
State: INC Sampling Point:
Section, Township, Range: NA
9/15/2022
DD11d
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
34.8477280 Long.-78.827087 Datum: WGS84
steep NWI Classification: PFO
climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
AMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X Yes X No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
point located downgradient of DP11 in a mature forested wetland. Area is primarily saturated by several lateral seepheads to the west and discharge from
m 7 upgradient. Flow in the valley is to the south.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
X
Saturation A3
X
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
X
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
X JThn
Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
10ther (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X
Water Stained Leaves (139)
X
Sphaqnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Observations:
:e Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
-Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 8
3tion Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic). Primary hydrology is seepheads, adjacent stream flow, and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: Dp11d
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Taxodium dishchum
30
Y
OBL
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
30
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Acer rubrum
10
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 12 (A)
4.
Nyssa aquatica
10
N
OBL
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 12 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
80 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 40
20 k
of Total Cover:
16
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
OBL species 70 x 1 70
1.
Acerrubrum
15
Y
FAC
FACW species 35 x 2 70
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 105 x 3 315
3.
Ilex opaca
10
Y
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 210 (A) 455 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.2 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
35
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 17.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
7
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Carex cherokeensis
20
Y
FACW
2.
Juncus effusus
15
Y
OBL
3.
Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
10
Y
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Woodwardia areolata 10 Y OBL
5.
Microstegium vimineum
10
Y
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Saururus cernuus
5
N
OBL
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8.
Diodia virginiana
5
N
FACW
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
80
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 40 20 k of Total Cover: 16
Woody
Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
10
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
15
= Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 7.5
20 k
of Total Cover:
3
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Mature forested habitat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: Dp11 d
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-8
10yr4/2
100
Mucky Loam / Clay
8-14
10yr4/1
95
10yr4/6
5
C
M
Sandy
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, 13)
X
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
X
Stratified Layers (A5)
X
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X
Remarks:
Several stratified layers inprofile. Meets organic masking requirements.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Chemours - Fayc
Chemours
Plant
City/County: Cumberland Sampling Date:
State: INC Sampling Point:
9/15/2022
DD13u
stigator(s): A.Mathes, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: NA
dform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 2-10 k
region (LRR or MLRA): P Lat. 34.8522590 Long.-78.828972 Datum: WGS84
Map Unit Name: Vaucluse-Gilead loamy sands, 15-25 k slopes NWI Classification: PFO
climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
AMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
point located upgradient of DP13 within the active channel of Willis Creek dominated with Taxodium distichum.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
X
Saturation A3
X
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
X
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
X
tThn Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
10ther (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X
Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Observations:
:e Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
-Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6
3tion Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic). Primary hydrology is high water table and floodplain of willis creek.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: Dpl3u
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Taxodium dishchum
75 Y
OBL
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 N
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3. Acer rubrum
10 N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 7 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 86 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
95 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 47.5
20 k of Total Cover:
19
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 85 x 1 85
1. Clethra alnifolia
10 Y
FACW
FACW species 10 x 2 20
2. Carpinus caroliniana
5 Y
FAC
FAC species 30 x 3 90
3.
FACU species 5 x 4 20
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 130 (A) 215 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.7 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
15 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 7.5
20 k of Total Cover:
3
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Taxodium distichum
5 Y
OBL
2. Smilax rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
3. Saururus cernuus
5 Y
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Apocynum cannabinum 5 Y FACU
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
20 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 10 20 k of Total Cover: 4
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 0
20 k of Total Cover:
0
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Mature forested habitat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: Dp13u
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type`
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
0-14
10yr4/2
100
Mucky Loam / Clay
`Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
X
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
X
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours - Fayetteville Plant City/County: Cumberland Sampling Date: 9/15/2022
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: Dpl3d
Investigator(s): A.Mathes, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope k: 0-2 k
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat. 34.8511660 Long.-78.828387 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse-Gilead loamy sands, 15-25 k slopes NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located downgradient of DP 13 within the active channel of Willis Creek dominated with Taxodium distichum.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
I Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface BS
X
Saturation A3
X
I Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
X
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 5
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-16 and 19-20, 2022 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the
September month -to -date (a -0.63" deficit from a 2.44" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which
0.12", 1.4", 0.2", and 0.17" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, 9/10, and 9/8, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 28.48" which is a 6.95" deficit
according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the month/year, the delineators felt
that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No
high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions
existed for the regional area for the week of September 14, 2022. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool
(Deter, USACE v.1.0.13) the calculated output was a -11 value "Normal Conditions" with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-
Year Normal Range (see attached graphic). Primary hydrology is high water table and floodplain of willis creek.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: Dpl3d
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
k Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Taxodium dishchum
60 Y
OBL
2. Betula nigra
30 Y
FACW
Number of dominant species that are
3. Acer rubrum
30 Y
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 8 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
120 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 60
20 k of Total Cover:
24
Total k cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plots ize r= 30'
OBL species 60 x 1 60
1. Clethra alnifolia
5 Y
FACW
FACW species 37 x 2 74
2.
FAC species 45 x 3 135
3.
FACU species 5 x 4 20
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 147 (A) 289 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.0 (B/A)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50 k
5 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0`
50 k of total Cover: 2.5
20 k of Total Cover:
1
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plots ize r- 30'
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Microstegium vimineum
5 Y
FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5 Y
FAC
3. Acer rubrum
5 Y
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Apocynum cannabinum 5 Y FACU
5. Boehmeria cylindrica
2 N
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
it.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in height.
22 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 11 20 k of Total Cover: 4.4
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50 k of total Cover: 0
20 k of Total Cover:
0
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Mature forested habitat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: Dp13d
Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type`
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
0-15
10yr4/2
100
Mucky Loam / Clay
`Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matra
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils •""
Histosol (At)
iPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
X
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
X
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
1 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
iStripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name
ncwam1
Date 9/14/2022
Wetland
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/ Organization
Nathan Weaver
Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Cape Fear
Basin
Cape Fear
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03030005
O Yes ❑. No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
34.837154055,-78.824052172
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? O Yes 0 No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
O Blackwater
❑. Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar (* Wind O Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? O Yes ❑. No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? O Yes ❑. No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? O Yes ❑. No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
❑. A ❑. A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
O B O B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
reduced diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
0 A * A Not severely altered
O B O B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
O C O C Water storage capacity or duration is substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (evaluate for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑. A * A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
O B ❑ B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
O C ❑ C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
O D ❑ D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. O A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑. B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
0 C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent guidance for National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils regional
indicators.
4a. O A Sandy soil
❑. B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
O C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
O D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
O E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. O A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑. B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. O A No peat or muck presence
* B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - assessment area opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
* A * A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑ B O B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
❑ C O C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area
(5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
❑ A
❑ A
❑ A
>_ 10% impervious surfaces
0 B
B
B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑ C
❑ C
❑ C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
❑ D
❑ D
❑ D
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑ E
❑ E
❑ E
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑�/ F
F
F
>_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑�/ G
G
G
>_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑ H
❑ H
❑ H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
* Yes O No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the open water. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland?
O A >_ 50 feet
O B From 30 to < 50 feet
O C From 5 to < 15 feet
O D From 15 to < 30 feet
❑. E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
* <- 15-feet wide O > 15-feet wide O Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑. Yes O No
7e. Is the tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
* Sheltered - open water width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic
O Exposed - open water width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
❑ A
O A
>_ 100 feet
❑ B
O B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑ C
O C
From 50 to < 80 feet
* D
❑. D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑ E
O E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑ F
O F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑ G
O G
From 5 to < 15 feet
0 H
0 H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration —assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
O A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
O B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
* C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
*. A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
O B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
O C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
0 A
0 A
0 A
>_ 500 acres
0 B
0 B
0 B
From 100 to < 500 acres
0 C
0 C
0 C
From 50 to < 100 acres
0 D
0 D
0 D
From 25 to < 50 acres
0 E
0 E
0 E
From 10 to < 25 acres
O F
O F
O F
From 5 to < 10 acres
0 G
0 G
0 G
From 1 to < 5 acres
* H
* H
* H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
0 1
0 1
0 1
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
0 J
0 J
0 J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
O K
O K
O K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet
wide.
Well Loosely
O A
O A
>_ 500 acres
* B
* B
From 100 to < 500 acres
O C
O C
From 50 to < 100 acres
O D
O D
From 10 to < 50 acres
O E
O E
< 10 acres
O F
O F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
* Yes O No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/tributary or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non -
forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider the eight
main points of the compass.
O A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
* B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
O C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
16. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
�. A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area
O B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
O C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
*. Yes O No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure in
airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
a O A O A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
°c O• B
B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
u O C
O C
Canopy sparse or absent
0 0 A
0 A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
O B
B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
-o
C
O C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
O A
O A
Dense shrub layer
B
B
Moderate density shrub layer
O C
O C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
*. A
O A
Dense herb layer
O B
* B
Moderate density herb layer
_ O C
O C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
*. A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
�. A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
O B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
O C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
*. A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
OA
OB
OC
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
O A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
O B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
*. D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Mature bottomland hardwood forest wetland within the floodplain of Cape Fear River. Primary hydrology from multiple upgradient seepheads that
range in intermittent to perennial flow, whereas saturation conditions persistent throughout much of year.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name ncwam1
Date of Assessment 9/14/2022
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Nathan Weaver
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name
ncwam2
Date 9/14/2022
Wetland
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/ Organization
Nathan Weaver
Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Cape Fear
Basin
Cape Fear
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03030005
O Yes * No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
34.840022198,-78.824980176
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? O Yes 0 No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
O Blackwater
❑. Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar © Wind O Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? O Yes ❑. No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? O Yes * No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? O Yes (* No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
❑. A ❑. A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
O B O B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
reduced diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑. A ❑. A Not severely altered
O B O B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
O C O C Water storage capacity or duration is substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (evaluate for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. O A ❑ A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
O B ❑ B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
O C ❑ C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑. D * D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. O A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
O B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
* C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent guidance for National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils regional
indicators.
4a. O A Sandy soil
❑. B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
O C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
O D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
O E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. * A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
O B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. * A No peat or muck presence
O B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - assessment area opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
* A * A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑ B O B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
❑ C O C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area
(5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
❑ A
❑ A
❑ A
>_ 10% impervious surfaces
0 B
B
B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑ C
❑ C
❑ C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
❑ D
❑ D
❑ D
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑ E
❑ E
❑ E
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑ F
❑ F
❑ F
>_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
0 G
G
G
>_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑ H
❑ H
❑ H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
* Yes O No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the open water. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland?
❑. A >_ 50 feet
O B From 30 to < 50 feet
O C From 5 to < 15 feet
O D From 15 to < 30 feet
O E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
* <- 15-feet wide O > 15-feet wide O Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑. Yes O No
7e. Is the tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
* Sheltered - open water width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic
O Exposed - open water width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
* A
❑. A
>_ 100 feet
❑ B
O B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑ C
O C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑ D
O D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑ E
O E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑ F
O F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑ G
O G
From 5 to < 15 feet
0 H
0 H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration —assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
*. A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
O B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
O C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
*. A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
O B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
O C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
0 A
0 A
0 A
>_ 500 acres
0 B
0 B
0 B
From 100 to < 500 acres
0 C
0 C
0 C
From 50 to < 100 acres
0 D
0 D
0 D
From 25 to < 50 acres
0 E
0 E
0 E
From 10 to < 25 acres
O F
O F
O F
From 5 to < 10 acres
* G
* G
* G
From 1 to < 5 acres
0 H
0 H
0 H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
0 1
0 1
0 1
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
0 J
0 J
0 J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
O K
O K
O K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet
wide.
Well Loosely
O A
O A
>_ 500 acres
* B
* B
From 100 to < 500 acres
O C
O C
From 50 to < 100 acres
O D
O D
From 10 to < 50 acres
O E
O E
< 10 acres
O F
O F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
* Yes O No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/tributary or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non -
forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider the eight
main points of the compass.
O A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
* B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
O C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
16. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
�. A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area
O B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
O C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
*. Yes O No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure in
airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
a O A O A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
°c O• B
B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
u O C
O C
Canopy sparse or absent
0 0 A
0 A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
�. B
B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
-o
O C
O C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
O A
O A
Dense shrub layer
B
B
Moderate density shrub layer
O C
O C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
*. A
*. A
Dense herb layer
O B
O B
Moderate density herb layer
_ O C
O C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
O A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
*. B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
�. A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
O B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
O C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
*. A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
OA
OB
OC
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
0 A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
O B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Mature bottomland hardwood forest wetland within the floodplain of Cape Fear River. Primary hydrology from multiple upgradient seepheads that
range in intermittent to perennial flow, whereas saturation conditions persistent throughout much of year.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name ncwam2
Date of Assessment 9/14/2022
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Nathan Weaver
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name
ncwam3
Date 9/14/2022
Wetland
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/ Organization
Nathan Weaver
Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Cape Fear
Basin
Cape Fear
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03030005
O Yes * No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
34.843214326,-78.825832834
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? O Yes 0 No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
O Blackwater
❑. Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar © Wind O Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? O Yes ❑. No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? O Yes * No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? O Yes (* No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
❑. A ❑. A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
O B O B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
reduced diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑. A ❑. A Not severely altered
O B O B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
O C O C Water storage capacity or duration is substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (evaluate for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. A ❑ A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
B ❑ B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
C ❑ C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
D * D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. O A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
O B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
* C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent guidance for National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils regional
indicators.
4a. O A Sandy soil
❑. B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
O C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
O D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
O E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. * A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
O B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. * A No peat or muck presence
O B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - assessment area opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
* A * A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑ B O B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
❑ C O C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area
(5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
❑ A
❑ A
❑ A
>_ 10% impervious surfaces
0 B
B
B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑ C
❑ C
❑ C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
❑ D
❑ D
❑ D
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑ E
❑ E
❑ E
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑�/ F
F
F
>_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑�/ G
G
G
>_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑ H
❑ H
❑ H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
* Yes O No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the open water. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland?
❑. A >_ 50 feet
O B From 30 to < 50 feet
O C From 5 to < 15 feet
O D From 15 to < 30 feet
O E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
* <- 15-feet wide O > 15-feet wide O Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑. Yes O No
7e. Is the tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
* Sheltered - open water width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic
O Exposed - open water width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
* A
❑. A
>_ 100 feet
❑ B
O B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑ C
O C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑ D
O D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑ E
O E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑ F
O F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑ G
O G
From 5 to < 15 feet
0 H
0 H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration —assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
*. A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
O B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
O C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
*. A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
O B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
O C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
0 A
0 A
0 A
>_ 500 acres
0 B
0 B
0 B
From 100 to < 500 acres
0 C
0 C
0 C
From 50 to < 100 acres
0 D
0 D
0 D
From 25 to < 50 acres
0 E
0 E
0 E
From 10 to < 25 acres
O F
O F
O F
From 5 to < 10 acres
* G
* G
* G
From 1 to < 5 acres
0 H
0 H
0 H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
0 1
0 1
0 1
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
0 J
0 J
0 J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
O K
O K
O K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet
wide.
Well Loosely
O A
O A
>_ 500 acres
* B
* B
From 100 to < 500 acres
O C
O C
From 50 to < 100 acres
O D
O D
From 10 to < 50 acres
O E
O E
< 10 acres
O F
O F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
* Yes O No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/tributary or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non -
forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider the eight
main points of the compass.
O A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
* B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
O C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
16. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
�. A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area
O B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
O C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
*. Yes O No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure in
airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
a O A O A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
°c O• B
B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
u O C
O C
Canopy sparse or absent
0 0 A
0 A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
�. B
B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
-o
O C
O C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
O A
O A
Dense shrub layer
O B
O B
Moderate density shrub layer
C
C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
�. A
A
Dense herb layer
O B
O B
Moderate density herb layer
_ O C
O C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
*. A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
�. A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
O B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
O C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
*. A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
OA
OB
OC
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
0 A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
O B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Mature bottomland hardwood forest wetland within the floodplain of Cape Fear River. Primary hydrology from multiple upgradient seepheads that
range in intermittent to perennial flow, whereas saturation conditions persistent throughout much of year.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name ncwam3
Date of Assessment 9/14/2022
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Nathan Weaver
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name
ncwam4
Date 9/14/2022
Wetland
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/ Organization
Nathan Weaver
Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Cape Fear
Basin
Cape Fear
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03030005
O Yes * No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
34.844902974,-78.826210986
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? O Yes 0 No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
O Blackwater
❑. Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar © Wind O Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? O Yes ❑. No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? O Yes * No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? O Yes (* No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
❑. A ❑. A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
O B O B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
reduced diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
O A O A Not severely altered
O B O B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑. C ❑. C Water storage capacity or duration is substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (evaluate for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. O A ❑ A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
❑. B * B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
O C ❑ C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
O D ❑ D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. O A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
O B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
* C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent guidance for National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils regional
indicators.
4a. O A Sandy soil
❑. B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
O C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
O D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
O E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. O A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑. B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. O A No peat or muck presence
* B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - assessment area opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
* A * A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑ B O B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
❑ C O C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area
(5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
❑ A
❑ A
❑ A
>_ 10% impervious surfaces
0 B
B
B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑ C
❑ C
❑ C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
❑ D
❑ D
❑ D
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑ E
❑ E
❑ E
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑ F
❑ F
❑ F
>_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
0 G
G
G
>_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑ H
❑ H
❑ H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
* Yes O No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the open water. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland?
O A >_ 50 feet
* B From 30 to < 50 feet
O C From 5 to < 15 feet
O D From 15 to < 30 feet
O E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
* <- 15-feet wide O > 15-feet wide O Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑. Yes O No
7e. Is the tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
* Sheltered - open water width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic
O Exposed - open water width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
❑ A
O A
>_ 100 feet
0 B
0 B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑ C
O C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑ D
O D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑ E
O E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑ F
O F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑ G
O G
From 5 to < 15 feet
0 H
0 H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration —assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
O A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
O B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
* C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
*. A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
O B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
O C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
0 A
0 A
0 A
>_ 500 acres
0 B
0 B
0 B
From 100 to < 500 acres
0 C
0 C
0 C
From 50 to < 100 acres
0 D
0 D
0 D
From 25 to < 50 acres
0 E
0 E
0 E
From 10 to < 25 acres
O F
O F
O F
From 5 to < 10 acres
0 G
0 G
0 G
From 1 to < 5 acres
* H
* H
* H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
0 1
0 1
0 1
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
0 J
0 J
0 J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
O K
O K
O K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet
wide.
Well Loosely
O A
O A
>_ 500 acres
O B
O B
From 100 to < 500 acres
O C
*. C
From 50 to < 100 acres
*. D
O D
From 10 to < 50 acres
O E
O E
< 10 acres
O F
O F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
* Yes O No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/tributary or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non -
forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider the eight
main points of the compass.
O A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
O B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
*. C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
16. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
�. A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area
O B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
O C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
*. Yes O No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure in
airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
a O A O A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
°c O• B
B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
u O C
O C
Canopy sparse or absent
0 0 A
0 A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
�. B
B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
-o
O C
O C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
O A
O A
Dense shrub layer
O B
O B
Moderate density shrub layer
C
C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
O A
O A
Dense herb layer
* B
* B
Moderate density herb layer
_ O C
O C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
*. A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
�. A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
O B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
O C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
*. A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
OA
OB
OC
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
O A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
O B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
*. C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Mature bottomland hardwood forest wetland within the floodplain of Cape Fear River. Primary hydrology from multiple upgradient seepheads that
range in intermittent to perennial flow, whereas saturation conditions persistent throughout much of year.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name ncwam4
Date of Assessment 9/14/2022
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Nathan Weaver
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name
ncwam6 PFO
Date 9/14/2022
Wetland
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/ Organization
Nathan Weaver
Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Cape Fear
Basin
Cape Fear
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03030005
O Yes * No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
34.846243641,-78.826221578
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? O Yes 0 No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
O Blackwater
❑. Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar © Wind O Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? O Yes ❑. No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? O Yes * No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? O Yes (* No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
❑. A ❑. A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
O B O B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
reduced diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑. A ❑. A Not severely altered
O B O B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
O C O C Water storage capacity or duration is substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (evaluate for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. O A ❑ A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
O B ❑ B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
❑. C * C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
O D ❑ D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. O A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
O B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
* C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent guidance for National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils regional
indicators.
4a. O A Sandy soil
❑. B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
O C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
O D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
O E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. O A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑. B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. A No peat or muck presence
O B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - assessment area opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
* A * A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑ B O B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
❑ C O C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area
(5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
❑ A
❑ A
❑ A
>_ 10% impervious surfaces
0 B
B
B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑ C
❑ C
❑ C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
❑ D
❑ D
❑ D
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑ E
❑ E
❑ E
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑ F
❑ F
❑ F
>_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
0 G
G
G
>_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑ H
❑ H
❑ H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
* Yes O No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the open water. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland?
❑. A >_ 50 feet
O B From 30 to < 50 feet
O C From 5 to < 15 feet
O D From 15 to < 30 feet
O E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
* <- 15-feet wide O > 15-feet wide O Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑. Yes O No
7e. Is the tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
* Sheltered - open water width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic
O Exposed - open water width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
* A
❑. A
>_ 100 feet
❑ B
O B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑ C
O C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑ D
O D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑ E
O E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑ F
O F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑ G
O G
From 5 to < 15 feet
0 H
0 H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration —assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
*. A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
O B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
O C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
*. A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
O B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
O C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
0 A
0 A
0 A
>_ 500 acres
0 B
0 B
0 B
From 100 to < 500 acres
0 C
0 C
0 C
From 50 to < 100 acres
0 D
0 D
0 D
From 25 to < 50 acres
0 E
0 E
0 E
From 10 to < 25 acres
O F
O F
O F
From 5 to < 10 acres
* G
* G
* G
From 1 to < 5 acres
0 H
0 H
0 H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
0 1
0 1
0 1
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
0 J
0 J
0 J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
O K
O K
O K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet
wide.
Well Loosely
O A
O A
>_ 500 acres
* B
* B
From 100 to < 500 acres
O C
O C
From 50 to < 100 acres
O D
O D
From 10 to < 50 acres
O E
O E
< 10 acres
O F
O F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
* Yes O No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/tributary or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non -
forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider the eight
main points of the compass.
O A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
* B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
O C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
16. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
�. A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area
O B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
O C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
*. Yes O No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure in
airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
a O A O A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
°c O• B
B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
u O C
O C
Canopy sparse or absent
0 0 A
0 A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
�. B
B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
-o
O C
O C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
O A
O A
Dense shrub layer
O B
O B
Moderate density shrub layer
C
C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
�. A
A
Dense herb layer
O B
O B
Moderate density herb layer
_ O C
O C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
*. A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
O A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
*. B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
O C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
*. A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
OA
OB
OC
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
0 A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
O B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Mature bottomland hardwood forest wetland within the floodplain of Cape Fear River. Primary hydrology from multiple upgradient seepheads that
range in intermittent to perennial flow, whereas saturation conditions persistent throughout much of year.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name ncwam6 PFO Date of Assessment
9/14/2022
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization
Nathan Weaver
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention Condition
LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name
ncwam6 PEM
Date 9/15/2022
Wetland
Basin Wetland
Assessor Name/ Organization
Nathan Weaver
Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Cape Fear
Basin
Cape Fear
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03030005
O Yes * No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
34.845612104,-78.825872572
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? O Yes 0 No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
O Blackwater
❑. Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar © Wind O Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? O Yes ❑. No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? O Yes * No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? O Yes (* No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
❑. A O A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
O B B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
reduced diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
O A O A Not severely altered
❑. B ❑. B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
O C O C Water storage capacity or duration is substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (evaluate for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. O A ❑ A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
O B ❑ B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
O C ❑ C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑. D * D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. O A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
O B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
* C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent guidance for National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils regional
indicators.
4a. O A Sandy soil
❑. B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
O C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
O D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
O E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. * A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
O B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. * A No peat or muck presence
O B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - assessment area opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
* A * A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑ B O B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
❑ C O C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area
(5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
❑ A
❑ A
❑ A
>_ 10% impervious surfaces
0 B
B
B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑ C
❑ C
❑ C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
❑ D
❑ D
❑ D
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑ E
❑ E
❑ E
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑ F
❑ F
❑ F
>_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
0 G
G
G
>_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑ H
❑ H
❑ H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
* Yes O No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the open water. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland?
❑. A >_ 50 feet
O B From 30 to < 50 feet
O C From 5 to < 15 feet
O D From 15 to < 30 feet
O E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
* <- 15-feet wide O > 15-feet wide O Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑. Yes O No
7e. Is the tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
* Sheltered - open water width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic
O Exposed - open water width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
* A
❑. A
>_ 100 feet
❑ B
O B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑ C
O C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑ D
O D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑ E
O E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑ F
O F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑ G
O G
From 5 to < 15 feet
0 H
0 H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration —assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
*. A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
O B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
O C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
*. A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
O B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
O C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
0 A
0 A
0 A
>_ 500 acres
0 B
0 B
0 B
From 100 to < 500 acres
0 C
0 C
0 C
From 50 to < 100 acres
0 D
0 D
0 D
From 25 to < 50 acres
0 E
0 E
0 E
From 10 to < 25 acres
O F
O F
O F
From 5 to < 10 acres
0 G
0 G
0 G
From 1 to < 5 acres
0 H
0 H
0 H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
*. I
*. I
*. I
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
0 J
0 J
0 J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
O K
O K
O K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet
wide.
Well Loosely
O A
O A
>_ 500 acres
O B
O B
From 100 to < 500 acres
O C
O C
From 50 to < 100 acres
O D
*. D
From 10 to < 50 acres
*. E
O E
< 10 acres
O F
O F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
* Yes O No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/tributary or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non -
forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider the eight
main points of the compass.
O A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
O B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
*. C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
16. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
O A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area
�. B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
O C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
*. Yes O No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure in
airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
a O A O A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
°c O B
O B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
u *. C
C
Canopy sparse or absent
0 0 A
0 A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
O B
O B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
-o
75; C
C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
�. A
A
Dense shrub layer
O B
O B
Moderate density shrub layer
O C
O C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
*. A
*. A
Dense herb layer
O B
O B
Moderate density herb layer
_ O C
O C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
O A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
*. B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
O A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
O B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
0 C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
O A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
*. B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
OA
OB
OC
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
O A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
O B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
*. D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Recently cutover open herbaceous wetland that is adjacent to a tributary to the Cape Fear River within the active floodplain.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name ncwam6 PEM Date of Assessment
9/15/2022
Wetland Type Basin Wetland Assessor Name/Organization
Nathan Weaver
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition
NA
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention Condition
NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Physical Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name ncwam7
Date 9/15/2022
Wetland Riverine Swamp Forest
Ecoregion Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Basin Cape Fear
O Yes * No Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Assessor Name/ Organization Nathan Weaver
Nearest Named Water Body Willis Creek
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03030005
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 34.851587982,-78.828958424
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? O Yes 0 No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
O Blackwater
❑. Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar © Wind O Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? O Yes ❑. No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? O Yes * No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? O Yes (* No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
❑. A ❑. A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
O B O B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
reduced diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑. A ❑. A Not severely altered
O B O B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
O C O C Water storage capacity or duration is substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (evaluate for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. O A ❑ A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
O B ❑ B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
❑. C * C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
O D ❑ D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑. A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
O B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
0 C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent guidance for National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils regional
indicators.
4a. O A Sandy soil
❑. B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
O C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
O D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
O E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. O A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑. B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. O A No peat or muck presence
* B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - assessment area opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
* A * A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑ B O B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
❑ C O C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area
(5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
❑ A
❑ A
❑ A
>_ 10% impervious surfaces
0 B
B
B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑ C
❑ C
❑ C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
0 D
D
❑ D
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑ E
❑ E
❑ E
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑ F
❑ F
❑ F
>_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
0 G
G
❑ G
>_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑ H
❑ H
❑ H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
* Yes O No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the open water. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland?
❑. A >_ 50 feet
O B From 30 to < 50 feet
O C From 5 to < 15 feet
O D From 15 to < 30 feet
O E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
O <- 15-feet wide * > 15-feet wide O Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑. Yes O No
7e. Is the tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
* Sheltered - open water width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic
O Exposed - open water width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
* A
❑. A
>_ 100 feet
❑ B
O B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑ C
O C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑ D
O D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑ E
O E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑ F
O F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑ G
O G
From 5 to < 15 feet
0 H
0 H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration —assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
O A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
O B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
* C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
O A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
O B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
*. C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
0 A
0 A
0 A
>_ 500 acres
0 B
0 B
0 B
From 100 to < 500 acres
0 C
0 C
0 C
From 50 to < 100 acres
0 D
0 D
0 D
From 25 to < 50 acres
0 E
0 E
0 E
From 10 to < 25 acres
* F
* F
* F
From 5 to < 10 acres
0 G
0 G
0 G
From 1 to < 5 acres
0 H
0 H
0 H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
0 1
0 1
0 1
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
0 J
0 J
0 J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
O K
O K
O K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet
wide.
Well Loosely
* A
* A
>_ 500 acres
O B
O B
From 100 to < 500 acres
O C
O C
From 50 to < 100 acres
O D
O D
From 10 to < 50 acres
O E
O E
< 10 acres
O F
O F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
* Yes O No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/tributary or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non -
forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider the eight
main points of the compass.
O A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
* B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
O C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
16. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
�. A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area
O B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
O C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
*. Yes O No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure in
airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
a O A O A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
°c O• B
B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
u O C
O C
Canopy sparse or absent
0 0 A
0 A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
O B
O B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
-o
C
C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
O A
O A
Dense shrub layer
O B
O B
Moderate density shrub layer
C
C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
O A
O A
Dense herb layer
* B
* B
Moderate density herb layer
_ O C
O C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
*. A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
�. A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
O B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
O C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
*. A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
O B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
OA
OB
OC
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
0 A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
O B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
O D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Mature forested riverine wetland that is largely forested with cypress within the active channel.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name ncwam7
Date of Assessment 9/15/2022
Wetland Type Riverine Swamp Forest Assessor Name/Organization Nathan Weaver
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 16, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.839085
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.82492
Total Points: 31.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S1
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
No (0)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10.5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Amphipoda, caddisfly, salamander
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 16, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.839368
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.82479
Total Points: 32
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S2
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 11.5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Amphipoda and a few frogs
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 16, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.839898
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.825267
Total Points: 30.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S3
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
No (0)
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Amphipoda
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 16, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.842308
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.825649
Total Points: 41.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S4
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 12.5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Amphipoda. Water is impounded below the stream point by a dam. The stream is heavily sedimented.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 16, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.841463
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.827879
Total Points: 36.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S4-u p
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 18.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Moderate (0.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Moderate (1)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Nematode worm and water bug
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 19, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.84453
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.826179
Total Points: 34.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S5 new location
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW
= 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Original point is now clearcut. The point was moved downstream, but the stream is disturbed by BMPs, road
construction, and equipment. Nematode worms observed.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 19, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.845577
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.826227
Total Points: 47
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S5T new location
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 23.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 13)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Amphipoda, salamanders, and frogs.
construction dam.
S5T was moved to a new location due to water impounding behind a recently
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 16, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.845101
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.828047
Total Points: 20
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S5-u p
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Intermittent (>19)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
No (0)
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
Other (0)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Stream 5 upgradient of the construction area was dry during the fall 2022 survey.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 20, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.846007
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.826094
Total Points: 25.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S6
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Intermittent (>19)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 11)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Moderate (1)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Abnormally dry relative to previous survey.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 20, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.848556
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.827393
Total Points: 43
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S7
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 12)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Amphipoda, mayfly, dragonfly, water bugs
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 20, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.848384
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.82876
Total Points: 30
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S7-u p
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
No (0)
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Strong (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Absent (0)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Moderate (1)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Only 25' of stream that isn't impacted, this is the beginning of S7, it is a seephead and then 25' of stream until
clearcut. Macro is Amphipoda, nematode worm, unidentified crustacean.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 20, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.851633
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.829179
Total Points: 33
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S8
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
No (0)
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8.5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Nematode, Diptera (dead). Stream disturbed by sedimentation from construction, resulting in a heavily sedimented
stream.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 20, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.850888
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.829804
Total Points: 31.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S8-u p
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
No (0)
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Strong (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Absent (0)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Nematode, Diptera
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 20, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.851848
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.82881
Total Points: 49.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S9
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 22.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 13.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Absent (1.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 13.5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Diptera and nematode. Lower than expected based on appearance of the stream and available habitat.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 20, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.850542
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.827748
Total Points: 11
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S10
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Ephemeral (<19)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 9)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
No (0)
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 0)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Strong (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Absent (0)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
No (0)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 2)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Strong (0)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
Other (0)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Dry at the time of fall 2022 survey.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 20, 2022
Project/Site: Chemours -Fall 2022
Latitude: 34.850156
Monitoring
Evaluator: N. Weaver
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.82708
Total Points: 56.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S11
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 23.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 13.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Absent (1.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 19.5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW
= 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Cape Fear River, will excluded from future monitoring efforts.
Sketch:
41

Appendix B
Photographic Record

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 1
Date: 10/4/2021
Direction: Northwest
Comments: 2021
constructed flow through
cell over Wetland 1,
causing impoundment
upstream. These flow
through cells are also
installed on Stream 4
(Wetland 2/3) and
Stream 5 (Wetland 4)
within the Wetlands
Study Area.
Photograph 2
Date: 7/ 12/2022
Direction: West
Comments: The clear-
cut areas along the
boundary wall access
road have been expanded
since the initial
delineation in 2022.
4
--"WOW'
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 1 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 3
Date: 9/16/2022
Direction: West
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 1
monitoring point.
Photograph 4
Date: 9/16/2022
Direction: North
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 2
monitoring point, which
had base water flow
despite the lack of recent
rain.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 2 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 5
Date: 9/16/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Stream 3
begins at a seep head and
flows into Wetland 2. It
had baseflow despite the
lack of recent rain.
Photograph 6
Date: 9/16/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Conditions
at the new Stream 4
monitoring point. The
original point is now
impounded behind a
flow through system.
The impoundment is
visible in the
photograph.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 3 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 7
Date: 9/16/2022
Direction: West
Comments: Conditions
at the new Stream 4
monitoring point,
looking upstream of the
impoundment.
Photograph 8
Date: 9/16/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 4 Up
monitoring point, which
is upgradient of the
barrier wall disturbance
area.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 4 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 9
Date: 9/19/2022
Direction: West
Comments: The original
S5 monitoring point
location has been clear-
cut for construction; a
new point was relocated
downstream.
Photograph 10
Date: 9/ 19/2022
Direction: West
Comments: Conditions
at the new Stream 5
monitoring point.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 5 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 11
Date: 9/16/2022
Direction: Northwest
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 5 Up
monitoring point, which
is upgradient of the
barrier wall disturbance
area. The stream bed was
dry at the time of survey,
but exhibited high water
table soil characteristics.
Photograph 12
Date: 9/ 19/2022
Direction: East
Comments: The original
S5t monitoring point is
beneath impounded
water behind a flow
through cell. The point
was relocated upstream.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 6 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 13
Date: 9/ 19/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Conditions
at the new Stream 5t
monitoring point,
looking upstream of the
impoundment.
Photograph 14
Date: 9/19/2022
Direction: South
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 6
monitoring point, it was
dry at the time of
sampling but exhibited
baseflow in 2020 and
2021.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 7 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 15
Date: 9/19/2022
Direction: Northwest
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 7
monitoring point.
Photograph 16
Date: 9/19/2022
Direction: West
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 7 Up
monitoring point, which
is upgradient of the
barrier wall disturbance
area. There was very
little stream above the
barrier wall.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 8 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 17
Date: 9/20/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 8
monitoring point.
Photograph 18
Date: 9/20/2022
Direction: West
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 8 Up
monitoring point, which
is upgradient of the
barrier wall disturbance
area. There was very
little stream upgradient
of the barrier wall area.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 9 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 19
Date: 9/20/2022
Direction: Northwest
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 9
monitoring point along
Willis Creek.
Photograph 20
Date: 9/20/2022
Direction: Northeast
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 10
monitoring point.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 10 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 21
Date: 9/20/2022
Direction: Southeast
Comments: Conditions
at the Stream 11
monitoring point.
Because Stream 11 is the
Cape Fear River it will
be removed from all
future monitoring.
Photograph 22
Date: 9/19/2022
Direction: Southwest
Comments: Wetland
Gauge pair for Wetland
1. Pairs of wetland
gauges have been
installed at five locations
throughout the Wetland
Study Area.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 11 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 23
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
1, a wetland data
point.
Photograph 24
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 1. Canopy trees
have been removed
for construction of the
flow through cell,
increasing sunlight at
the DP.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 12 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 25
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
1U, a wetland
datapoint.
Photograph 26
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 1U. The flow
through cell can be
seen and is
impounding water.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 13 01.04.23

II P O OGRA HIC RECORDS II
Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 27
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
2, an upland data
point.
Photograph 28
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: South
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 2. Although no
canopy over the 30'
plot was removed,
adjacent canopy
removal is allowing
increased sunlight to
hit the ground within
the plot.
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 14 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours
Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works
Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 29
MAM11l�ij o
Date: 9/ 14/2022
Direction: N/A���
Comments: Soil
profile for data pointR'''
`
3, a wetland data
Soil
point. was
relatively dry at the
time of sampling.
Photograph 30
c s,
of ! � r
Date:9/14/2022
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 3.
ij-
r..
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 15 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 31
,
Date: 9/ 14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 3U, a
wetland data point. Soil
was relatively dry at the
time of sampling.
Photograph 32
Y
'
Date:9/14/2022
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
3U. Much of the
herbaceous layer was
Japanese stilt grass; an
exotic, invasive plant.
9 '
V !
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 16 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 33
Date: 9/ 14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 4, an
upland data point.
Photograph 34
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
4, an upland data point.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 17 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours
Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works
Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 35
°a
Date: 9/ 14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 5, a'
wetland data point.
_ :_IX f ,;
Photograph 36
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point`
5. Some canopy trees
have been removed for
construction of the flow�ti
through cell, increasing
r ° �. �"
available sunlight for the
j CXX
herbaceous layer.
P •�qC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 18 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 37
Date: 9/20/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 5u, a
wetland datapoint.
Photograph 38
Date: 9/20/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
5u.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 19 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 39
Date: 9/14/2022—
MGM
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 5U2, a
_ MMMMM
wetland data point.
Photograph 40
'
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
iES: A
r°
5U2. DP5U2 is heavily
influenced by adjacent
seep head flow. Water
flows south to Wetland
3.
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 20 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 41
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 5U3, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 42
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
5U3.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 21 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 43
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
= -- M M N Oki
for data point 6, an
-
M1IMMII
upland data point.
-.L
,IlNrrr
Photograph 44
Date: 9/14/2022
-
:�y gg
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point;,,
y
6. Recently cleared
timber for the flow
through cell to the
southwest has increased
sunlight and reduced
canopy cover.'�'
"
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 22 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 45
•!�.wgo A
1 l •MMMMMM Y'�
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: N/A
`1r�lIM
Comments: Soil profile
,
,.,.MMllrr ,
for data point 7, a
V
wetland data point. Data
_
point 7 is now
d
submerged by water due
y 5
to impoundment from
downstream flow
through cell
construction, so the point
was moved slightly west.
Photograph 46
-,
Date: 9/14/2022.,,
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
7.
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 23 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 47
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 8, an
upland data point.
Photograph 48
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
8.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 24 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 49
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 9, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 50
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
9. This portion of
Wetland 6 is PEM.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 25 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 51
Date: 10/5/2021
Direction: South
Comments: Data point
10, an upland data point,
is now buried by the
access road to a recently
constructed flow through
cell.
Photograph 52
Date: 10/5/2021
Direction: North
Comments: Data point
10, an upland data point,
is now buried by the
access road to a recently
constructed flow through
cell.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 26 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 53
Date: 9/ 14/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 9u, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 54
Date: 9/14/2022
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
9u. This portion of
Wetland 6 is PFO.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 27 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Chemours
Project • '
WorksSite: Fayetteville
1 1 Bladen County,
Photograph
-
. ` f t�',
"
r rr
1 ' 1
A s
Direction: A
Comments: Data point
11, a wetland data point.
Y,
i
• mob' �+
1
1 1 _ 1 6
Photograph
F
tit
1 9/15/2022
Direction: •
�'
�,�-i�' 7within
}
Comments: Data point
the
• • • . •stream
'.�����-'
7 • is fed by
supplemental seep head
flow from'�
!t' �'
4
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 28 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 57
`
Date: 9/15/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 11 D, a
j
wetland data point. Soil
was saturated.
V
Photograph 58
,
Date:9/15/20229
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
11D. Herbaceous layer
was mostly native plants,
v
and ground was
saturated by adjacent
4.
seep head flow as streamr
7 became more incised.
Id
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 29 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours
Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works
Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 59
Date: 10/6/2021
Direction: N/A
Comments: Data point
12, an upland data point.
myGr;
Ail n _.
NM*
16
�l
Photograph 60
=- -
Date: 10/6/2021
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
12, looking towards
Wetland 6. Recent road
construction has led to
-
reduced canopy cover
and increased sunlight
from the West.
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 30 01.04.23

Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 61
Date: 9/15/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 13, a
wetland data point. Soil
was saturated.
Photograph 62
Date: 9/ 15/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
13. Primary hydrology is
the Willis Creek
floodplain. Water was
lower than September
2020 surveys, but soil
was still saturated with a
high water table.
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 31 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 63
Date: 9/15/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Data point
13D, a wetland data
d
4
point.
_
*r4
it it
Photograph 64
I!
Date: 9/15/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
13D. Primary hydrology
o
is the Willis Creek
floodplain. Soil was
saturated and water table
was high. Water level
was lower than
September 2020.
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 32 01.04.23

II P O OGRA HIC RECORDS II
I Client: Chemours
Site: Fayetteville Works
Photograph 65
Date: 9/15/2022
I Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 13U, a
wetland data point. Soil
was saturated.
Photograph 66
Date: 9/15/2022
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
13U. Primary hydrology
is the Willis Creek
floodplain. Water was
lower than September
2020 surveys, but soil
was still saturated with a
high water table.
Project Number: TR0795C
Location: Bladen County, NC
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 33 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 67
Date: 9/15/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: Data point
14, an upland data point.
I�
1
C
� MMrM1�
Photograph 68
T
Date: 9/15/2022
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
�
14.
Ar-
it
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 34 01.04.23

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Project Number: TR0795C
Site: Fayetteville Works Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 69
•;. :.: r: -�
Date:9/16/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: A SWITC
trained biologist sampled
_ 1
each stream monitoring
location for at least 15
minutes for macro-
invertebrates,
amphibians, crayfish,
and mollusks.
.-
4
- 4
a 5 •r� J
Photograph 70
Date: 9/16/2022
Direction: N/A
Comments: A SWITC
trained biologist sampled
each stream monitoring
location for at least 15
minutes for macro -
invertebrates,
amphibians, crayfish,
and mollusks.
TR0759C Chemours Fayetteville Works 35 01.04.23

Appendix C
Section 401 Monitoring Plan and Monitoring
Plan Addendum

Fayetteville Works Wetlands Monitoring Plan -- Barrier Wall Impact Monitoring
This draft monitoring plan describes the approach for monitoring and measuring possible impacts
on the wetlands caused by the construction of the barrier wall at Fayetteville Works. This is an
initial draft and will be refined in consultation with the Corps of Engineers.
Baseline Wetland Characterization
To provide for accurate measure of wetland impacts due to the construction of remediation activities,
a baseline assessment will be conducted prior to the commencement of construction. This
assessment will focus on a detailed characterization of wetlands previously identified in the project
area by Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. and included in the previously submitted Wetland Delineation
Report (October 2020). Fourteen locations, corresponding with the existing U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) Wetland Routine Data Form plots completed during the 2020 wetland
delineation (7 wetland, 7 upland), will be revisited during the baseline wetland characterization field
effort to gather additional data not included in a typical wetland delineation for the purpose of
obtaining additional baseline characteristics. In addition, two new randomly selected sample plots
will be added during the baseline assessment that will be incorporated into the monitoring program
to fully characterize the upgradient/downgradient conditions along the fringe of each wetland.
Corresponding photographs will be taken at each monitoring plot (photo point) in each cardinal
direction, along with a photo of the soil profile. Additional representative photographs will also be
taken at fixed locations which best reflect the observed hydrological conditions of the site and
surrounding habitats. The same monitoring plots and photo points will be used during each
subsequent monitoring event to evaluate changes to the site hydrology and/or any response in the
characteristics of the wetland habitats. Upon completion of the baseline characterization survey, a
report of findings complete with a photographic record and figures will be submitted to the USACE
for review prior to the remediation activities to establish baseline conditions for comparison to
subsequent monitoring results.
Post -remedy Monitoring Plan
Post -remedy monitoring will be conducted for three years following implementation of remediation
activities, consistent with anticipated requirements of the permit modification. If the performance
standards defined below are met after three years, Chemours will petition the USACE to be released
from further monitoring requirements. If performance standards are not met after three years, post -
remedy monitoring will continue until the requirements are satisfied or until impacts to wetlands are
evident, thenceforth compensatory mitigation for the impacts will be assessed by the USACE. Post -
remedy monitoring will focus on monitoring changes (if any) in hydrology and follow-on effects to
the delineated wetland habitats within the project area and assessing the areal extent of the delineated
wetlands and overall functionality of the wetland habitat.
The performance standards for this monitoring plan are as follows:
1. No non -wetland determinations at any assigned wetland monitoring point.

2. Maintain an average areal extent of 90 percent of the delineated wetland boundary, as tabulated
by acres unit measurement, following three years monitoring.
Pre planning Desktop Review
Prior to commencing field activities, an office desktop review will be conducted to compile reference
materials on climatic and hydraulic conditions at the site prior to each monitoring event, as climatic
events (droughts, floods, etc.) can often impact qualitative wetland characteristics. The desktop
review will enable an understanding of the current climatic conditions and allow for a calibration of
the anticipated field monitoring. Data from the National Weather Service's Fayetteville Area, NC
climate station, U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) drought monitor, the nearest USGS river gauge for
the Cape Fear River at the W.O. Huske Dam (Station ID 02105500), the USACE's Antecedent
Precipitation Tool (APT), and available groundwater wells will be assessed against the Fall 2020
wetland delineation event, baseline assessment, and preceding monitoring events and included in the
monitoring reports.
Field Monitoring
Post -remedy field monitoring will consist of conducting site visits annually during the growing
season by qualified wetland biologists. The site visit will involve a quantitative assessment using the
USACE Routine Wetland Data Form in accordance with the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 at
each monitoring point identified in the baseline characterization assessment and a visual evaluation
of the physio state of the wetland and its surface hydrology. In addition, the site will be surveyed
for indications of potential negative wetland plant stressors (e.g. — lack of growth/vigor, mortality,
upland/pioneer plant competition) not related to natural climatic or storm -related damage.
Below is a schedule for field monitoring activities.
Monitoring Task
Schedule
Baseline Wetland Characterization
Summer/Fall 2021
Post Remedy Monitoring Year 1
Summer 2022
Post Remedy Monitoring Year 2
Summer 2023
Post Remedy Monitoring Year 3
Summer 2024
A global positioning system (GPS) receiver capable of submeter accuracy will be used for navigating
the perimeter of the wetland boundary and for collecting field data, per the USACE standard
operating procedures. GPS positions and final monitoring locations will be provided as part of the
baseline monitoring report.
Successive monitoring reports will be prepared each year, for three years, and provided to the
USACE by December 31 of the year subsequent to annual data collection. The overall objective of
each monitoring report will be to illustrate status quo, or deviation from, stipulated performance

standards. This will be achieved by summarizing data and providing comparisons to data collected
during previous years. Figures will be generated that identify areas of interest or concern, as well
as, trends of the wetland data forms results. For example, if the percent dominance test for a wetland
data form begins to trend towards less dominated by facultative species or if the number of hydrology
indicators are reduced, these changes will be mapped and indicated in the monitoring report.
Furthermore, a summary discussion of the monitoring event's pre -planning review and observed
surface hydrology shall be incorporated into the report. A statement defining the results of the
monitoring period, along with recommendations for specific monitoring observations/concerns, will
be provided in each report.
After Year 3 of the monitoring program, a formal wetland delineation will be conducted to compare
the areal extent with the initial Fall 2020 delineation. In accordance with standard USACE
delineation methodology, wetlands will be flagged and labeled with the feature identification (ID),
flag ID, and delineation date. A Wetland Delineation Report will be drafted with completed data
forms and tabulated acreages for each wetland feature. High -resolution figures will be generated
that show the current delineation results along with any changes in the wetland boundaries
highlighted in a contrasting color. Due to an expected maximum submeter-accuracy of the GPS data
collection, a 10 percent tolerance between areal extents will be permitted to quantify final
performance standard for this monitoring program. Since impacts to stream features will be
mitigated through purchase of compensatory mitigation credits for the project, the surface area for
ordinary high-water marks of streams will be excluded from the performance standard criteria.
If the monitoring program identifies that the performance standard cannot be achieved or if evidence
of permanent impacts to the wetlands from the activities is documented, Chemours agrees to consult
with the USACE to negotiate compensatory mitigation for impacts to wetlands.

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC. P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
Memorandum
Date: September 8, 2022, Revised September 15, 2022
To: The Chemours Company, FC, LLC
From: Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430
Raleigh, NC 27607
PH 919.870.0576
FAX [phone]
www.geosyntee.com
Subject: Wetland Monitoring Plan: Addendum — Updated September 15, 2022
Chemours Fayetteville Works Project
Bladen/Cumberland County, North Carolina
DWR # 20190752v6; USACE Aid # SAW-2019-00296
INTRODUCTION
This updated Wetland Monitoring Plan Addendum ("Addendum") has been prepared by
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. (Geosyntec) for The Chemours Company FC, LLC
(Chemours). On August 13, 2021 the Wetland Monitoring Plan ("Monitoring Plan") was
submitted to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) along with a
Section 404 permit modification request (SAW-2019-00296) through the United States Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This addendum to the previously submitted plan is based on comments by
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) via email on August 25, 2022.
This document first presents a summary of the stream and wetland monitoring scope described in
both the Monitoring Plan and this Addendum, and then presents the Addendum monitoring scope
additions based on comments and recommendations received from NCDEQ.
SUMMARY OF MONITORING SCOPE
The table on the following page summarizes the monitoring scopes to be implemented based on
both the Monitoring Plan and this Addendum.
engineers I scientists I innovators

Wetland Monitoring Plan: Addendum
September 15, 2022
Page 2
Table 1 Summary of Monitoring Scope
Performance Monitoring Plan
Standards and Addendum
Groundwater Addendum
Gauges
USACE Monitoring Plan
Datapoints and Addendum
NCWAM Forms Addendum
DWR Stream Addendum
Form
Wetland
Monitoring Plan
Delineation
Reports Addendum
Annual, 5 years
Continuous, 5 years
Annual, 5 years
Annual, 5 years
Semi-annual (early and late
growing season), 5 years
Pre -construction: 2020
Post Construction: 2027
Annual, 5 years
Geosyntec
consultants
CeasynWL Gmsa lie Ab of NQ P.C.
NC Umnse Nw C-3,W and C-195
Wetland Study Area
Wetlands 1, 2, 3, and 6
Wetland and Upland
(Figure 1)
Central Area of Each
Wetland
Stream reaches above and
below barrier wall
Wetland Study Area
N/A
Notes:
USACE: United States Army Corps of Engineers
DWR: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources
NCWAM: North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method
MONITORING PLAN ADDENDUM
This section presents first comments received from NCDEQ on August 25, 2022 in italicized text
followed by responses in plain text. Responses are provided for comments numbered 5.a.i through
5.d.i in the DEQ comment letter. These responses describe additions and modifications to the
monitoring scope and serve as an addendum supplement to the existing Monitoring Plan. Wetlands
referenced in this addendum are described in Section 3.1.1. of the Waters of the US Findings
Report and detailed in Figure 1(a-c).
5a.i "Please speck the `additional information' that will be gathered as part of the baseline
characterization. Specifically what data will be collected and how will it be collected? In
Section 3.1.1. of the Waters of the US Findings Report seven distinct wetland areas were identified
based on initial observations. Please expand the baseline assessment for the seven wetland areas
to include characterization of landscape, soils, vegetation, and hydrology. The Division
recommends NC Wetland Assessment Methodology (NCWAM) forms completed for each of the
seven wetland areas identified to document baseline conditions of these wetland systems. Ideally,
a licensed soil scientist should conduct the soils assessments. "
Geosyntec will collect NCWAM forms within the center of each of the seven wetlands during
2022 data collection field effort, prior to barrier wall construction. Additionally, NCWAM forms
engineers I scientists I innovators

Wetland Monitoring Plan: Addendum
September 15, 2022
Page 3
Geosyntec
consultants
CeasynWL Gmsa lie Ab of NQ P.C.
NC Umnse Nw C-3,W and C-195
will be completed at the same locations for each subsequent year of the monitoring period.
NCWAM forms will be completed by an experienced biologist who has completed Wetland
Delineation training for USACE methodology, including soil identification and characterization.
Additionally, a licensed soil scientist will conduct the soils assessments during the baseline
characterization effort planned for September 2022.
5a. ii "The initial wetland determination sample points focus on wetland/upland edges which is
appropriate for a delineation effort. However, the Division believes that plan should focus on
systemwide functional monitoring of the resources. Therefore, please add additional data
collection points in the central areas of wetlands W2, W3, and W6. "
In an effort to better characterize the wetland form and function as a whole, and not just along the
delineated boundaries, Geosyntec established nine additional data points during a 2021
preliminary baseline assessment within the central areas of the wetlands. Data points appended
with a "U" (upgradient of the original datapoint) or "D" (downgradient of the original data point)
are additional datapoints sampled in 2021 to supplement the original data points (Table 2). The
locations of the original and additional data points are provided in Figure I of the addendum. These
additional data points already established by Geosyntec are consistent with NCDEQs' request for
additional data points.
Table 2 Wetlands and Associated Datapoints
1Data PointsAdditional
Data PI I
Wetland 1 (W1) PFO
1,2
lU
Wetland 2 (W2) PFO
3,4
3U
Wetland 3 (W3) PFO
5,6
5U, 5U2, 5U3
Wetland 4 (W4) PFO
7,8
N/A
Wetland 6 (W6) PEM
9,10
N/A
Wetland 6 (W6) PFO
11,12
9U, I ID
Wetland 7 (W7) PFO
14
13D, 13, 13U
5a. iii "At least 4 epresentative baseline groundwater gauges should be installed before
construction to document pre -construction data such as the existing hydroperiod and be used in
postconstruction monitoring. "
At the request of NCDEQ five transects with representative baseline groundwater gauges will be
installed within wetlands 1, 2, 3, and 6. Five pairs of upland/wetland gauges will be installed in
the wetlands and adjacent upland areas along a transect perpendicular to the wetland
boundary (Figure 1); and remain in place throughout the course of the monitoring period. The
gauges will be installed to a minimum depth of 15 inches below surface using USACE technical
specifications outlined in the June 2005 Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of
Potential Wetland Sites, ERDC TN-WRAP-05-2. The gauges are anticipated to be
installed during mid -September 2022 prior to barrier wall installation to establish baseline
conditions.
engineers I scientists I innovators

Wetland Monitoring Plan: Addendum
September 15, 2022
Page 4
Geosyntec
consultants
CeasynWL Gmsa lie Ab of NQ P.C.
NC Umnse Nw C-3,W and C-195
5a. iv "For any stream segments left as `non -impacted' on the western side of the proposed wall,
please propose a baseline assessment. The Division recommends conducting DWR Stream Forms
assessments pursuant to the North Carolina Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and their Origins, Version 4.11 for all stream proposed to be `nonimpacted. "'
Geosyntec will conduct baseline assessment west of the barrier wall for the four non -impacted
areas of the streams above the barrier wall using the DWR stream form identified by NCDEQ.
These forms will be completed by an experienced biologist or one who has completed the NC
Surface Water Identification Training Certificate program. Geosyntec will resurvey the streams
west (non -impacted) and east (impacted) of the barrier wall semi-annually to occur in the early
growing season and the late growing season. An emphasis of the detailed documentation of
monitored streams' biology (macrobenthics and other biological indicators) will be incorporated
into the development of the forms.
5b. i "Given the permanent drawdown expected from the proposed barrier wall and the connection
between several of the wetlands' primary hydrology to the hillside/upstream seeps, the Division is
concerned that visual observation monitoring is not sufficient to demonstrate a `no impact'
determination. Therefore, the Division recommends direct hydrologic measurement using multiple
groundwater gauges over a multiyear monitoring period. Groundwater gauges should be installed
per US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) technical specifications guidance. "
As described in response to comment 5a.iii., multiple groundwater gauges will be installed prior
to the construction activities to provide baseline data. These data will be monitored continuously
during the five year monitoring period. These data will offer further understanding of the influence
of the remedy construction on recorded groundwater levels within the wetland study area. This
will also allow specific measurement of hydrological changes of the ground water table in the
wetlands.
5b.ii "The monitoring plan's performance standards need to be more specific and measurable.
For example, groundwater gauges should meet a minimum 5% hydroperiod during the growing
season each year under normal rainfall conditions. Please update the plan to include
specific/measurable performance standards. The growing season start/end dates (and source of
this information) should be specified in the monitoring plan. In addition, the distance from the site
to the rainfall data sources should be provided if there is no on -site rain gauge. "
To assess groundwater levels within the wetlands groundwater gauges will be monitored
throughout the requested 5-year monitoring period post -construction. Each gauge will log
groundwater elevation throughout the length of the study.
A performance monitoring line of evidence for wetland conditions will be groundwater gauge data
meeting a minimum of 5% hydroperiod (12.15 consecutive days) each year during the growing
season indicated by groundwater within 12 inches (") of soil surface to meet the primary hydrology
indicator for high water table. Note, annual reports will document the longest consecutive time
period where groundwater levels were higher than 12" below soil surface for each groundwater
engineers I scientists I innovators

Wetland Monitoring Plan: Addendum
September 15, 2022
Page 5
Geosyntec
consultants
CeasynWL Gmsa lie Ab of NQ P.C.
NC Umnse Nw C-3,W and C-195
gauge, and document for each gauge the cumulative time groundwater levels were higher than 12"
from soil surface during the growing season. The growing season is 16 March to 14 November
(243 days) based on the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Bladen County Soil
Survey, for each year under normal rainfall conditions (a review of NRCS WETS table growing
season data did not yield any available data for Bladen or Cumberland Counties). Normal rainfall
conditions are determined to occur when rainfall values for a typical year. Typical year conditions
will generally be determined by: Normal precipitation conditions based on the three 30-day periods
preceding the observation date. For each period, a weighted condition value is assigned by
determining whether the 30-day precipitation total falls within, above, or below the 70th and 30th
percentiles for totals from the same date range over the preceding 30 years. A determination of
"normal," "wetter than normal," or "drier than normal" is made based on the condition value sum.
The USACE's Antecedent Precipitation Tool will be consulted to assess typical year precipitation
totals. Additional reference rainfall data will be assessed from the Fayetteville Area (PWC)
monitoring station, located approximately 15 miles north of the Site. This station is the closest
station to the Site which includes historical average month -to -date and year-to-date data to use as
a reference for "normal" conditions. Rainfall data may also be augmented using data from
Chemours' Onsite meteorological data station which records data on five minute intervals and the
United States Geological Survey (USGS) W.O. Huske Dam precipitation gauge (station
02105500) which records rainfall data on 15 minute intervals. The Onsite met station is
approximately one mile away from the wetlands and the USGS station is between 100 yards and
one mile away from the wetlands.
5b. iii "In addition to groundwater monitoring, the Division believes that an annual assessment of
vegetation composition and health is important. The proposed monitoring plan does identify good
examples of negative wetland plant stressors (lack of growth/vigor, mortality, upland/pioneer
plant competition). However, the monitoring plan proposes use of USACE wetland data forms as
the assessment tool for identification of the vegetation stressors. These forms were developed as a
delineation tool and not a monitoring/functional assessment tool. Therefore, please expand the
proposed data collection to include information such as tree/shrub species, height, DBH, health,
and wetland indicator status to assess changes in wetland community diversity, density and health.
The Division recommends using NCWAMforms. "
While use of the USACE methodology can provide adequate data on vegetative conditions by
detailing species composition, dominance, indicator status, etc.; Geosyntec agrees with NCDEQ
that additional data using NCWAM forms will provide even more detail on vegetative community
species composition and condition/health and will supplement the monitoring plan well.
Geosyntec will utilize NCWAM forms within each of the seven wetlands. Each form will be
completed annually for a five year period at the same location within each wetland.
5c. i "To assess potential secondary impacts to surface waters, the Division believes that semi-
annual assessments of surface hydrology indicators is necessary. Please update the monitoring
plan to include conducting DWR Stream Form assessments pursuant to the North Carolina
engineers I scientists I innovators

Wetland Monitoring Plan: Addendum
September 15, 2022
Page 6
Geosyntec
consultants
CeasynWL Gmsa lie Ab of NQ P.C.
NC Umnse Nu: C-3,W and C-195
Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins, Version
4.11 for all stream segments on a semi-annual basis. "
DWR Stream Form assessments will be conducted for each stream (Figure 1) by an experienced
biologist or one who has completed the Surface Water Identification Training Certification course.
The form will be completed at the same location semi-annually (early growing season and late
growing season) to monitor for potential changes in surface hydrology and the effects on the
biological community.
5d. i "The Division believes that three years will likely not be a sufficient length of time to visually
assess the extent ofstream and wetland function degradation or loss. Therefore, please update the
plan to include five years of monitoring for all elements. After five years, the groundwater data,
surface hydrology indicators and vegetation composition/health should collectively provide
evidence ofwhether the barrier wall is having an impact on adjacent wetlands and surface waters.
This information along with a site re -delineation should allow proper assessment of whether state
wetland and surface water resources have been lost or significantly degraded thereby potentially
requiring mitigation. "
At the request of NCDEQ, the monitoring period will be extended from three years to five years
post -construction, while also including the additional monitoring protocol adjustments detailed
above. Reports will be submitted annually to NCDEQ by January 31s1 of the following year.
Encl.
Tables Table 1: Summary of Monitoring Scope
Table 2: Wetlands and Associated Datapoints
Figures Figure 1 a-c: Wetland Monitoring Point Locations
Wetland Monitoring Plan: Addendum DWR # 20190752v6; USACE Aid # SAW-2019-00296
engineers I scientists I innovators

Figures

N
N
� � Forcemain.
7,
w i.�, , s ' Willis Creek
a*, A,.
Wr;� Tntiutary Capture.
,.` gS NI
iris tidK�> ; r. • t
S8
pfi4 ❑
4
S 10 •;
t .
S,11
10
Seep A
`Tr�ib�utary 'Capture
S7
Legend
. 2020 Upland Datapoint
South Forcemain
Delineated Feature:
• 2021 Additional Wetland Datapoint
■ D Barrier Wall Barrier Wall
® Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM)
. 2020 Wetland Datapoint
r_ Site Boundary
® Palustrine Emergent (herbaceous) Wetland (PEM)
OStream Monitoring Datapoint
Seep
® Palustrine Forested —land (PFO)
QEx -situ Capture Location
Nearby Tributary to River
Estimated Catchment to Seep Flow Through Cells
O S-PA
■ Flow-Thmugh Cell
Wetlands Investigation Area
a Seep B
Surfcial Aquifer Extraction Well
® Exclusion Areas
a Seep
Black Creek Aquifer Extraction Well
® Wastewater Treatment Pad
Seep D
North Forcemain
Notes:
1. The outline of Cape Rivlineer is awpp
to and isbasedon open data from ArcGIS
Online and North Carolina Department of
2. Besema EnvironmentstFyear
l Qua NC OneMapl 2(k19,.
North CamPnal f rtment of Information
Technd Government fete Analytics Center, Center
for G p hicclnformation and Anal is
eograp y
ps: p.gov.
AvailaNe at htt /p%www.nconema
JY.
250 125 0 250 Feet
Wetland Monitoring Point Locations
Wetland Monitoring Report -2021
Chemours Fayetteville Works
Cumberland/Bladen County, North Carolina
Geosyntecc n=...a = n=.P . Figure
TC. Licci.cc �ti C-3:�ia and!'.-v�
C(1RS11)Y3RYS
la
Raleigh September 2022

S7
W6-A
i
i
TRIB
�l
1�
S5-N'
A _
re
t L3-AA s
Seep B
Capture
♦ S4-N le
i
t
s_•
1
i
W2-B
Legend
. 2020 Upland Datapoint
South F.—main
Delineated Feature:
• 2021 Additional Wetland Datapoint
■ f Barrier Wall Barrier Wall
® Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM)
. 2020 Wetland Datapoint
Site Boundary
® Palustrine Emergent (herbaceous) Wetland (PEM)
OStream Monitoring Datapoint
Seep
® Palustrine Forested —land (PFO)
QEx -situ Capture Location
Nearby Tributary to River
Estimated Catchment to Seep Flow Through Cells
O S-PA
■ Flow-Thmugh Cell
Wetlands Investigation Area
a Seep B
Surfcial Aquifer Extraction Well
® Exclusion Areas
a Seep
Black Creek Aquifer Extraction Well
® Wastewater Treatment Pad
Seep D
North Forcemain
Noes:
1. The outline of Cape River is awpp
to and iisebesed on open data from ArcGIS
Online and North Carolina Department of
En—mQuail:
2. Besema enter Qua INC Onenine 20k19,.
file
North Camlme rtment of Information
Technd Government Data Analytics Center, Center
for G p hiccinformation and Anal is
eograp y
ps: p.gov.
Available at htt /�w.nwnema
JY.
B
--giv,: _.16.
250 125 0 250 Feet
Wetland Monitoring Point Locations
Wetland Monitoring Report -2021
Chemours Fayetteville Works
Cumberland/Bladen County, North Carolina
Geosyntecc n=...a = n=.P . Figure
TC. Licci.cc �ti C-3:�ia and!'.-v�
C(1RS11)t3RtS
1 b
Raleigh September 2022

F-

Appendix D
W.O. Huske Lock Gauge Height Data

#---------------------------------- WARNING ----------------------------------------
# Some
of the data that
you have obtained from
this
U.S. Geological Survey database may not
# have
received Director's
approval. Any such
data
values are
qualified as provisional and
# are
subject to revision.
Provisional data are released on the
condition that neither the
# USGS
nor the United States
Government may be
held
liable for
any damages resulting from its use.
# Go
to http://help.waterdata.usgs.gov/policies/provisional-data-statement
for more information.
# File
-format description:
http://help.waterdata.usgs.gov/faq/about-tab-delimited-output
# Automated -retrieval info:
http://help.waterdata.usgs.gov/faq/automated-retrievals
# Contact:
[e-mail]
# retrieved:
2023-01-04
16:40:54 -05:00 (natwebcaas0l)
# Data
for the following
1 site(s) are contained in
this file
# USGS 02105SOO CAPE
FEAR R AT WILM 0 HUSKE
LOCK
NR TARHEEL,
NC
# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# TS_ID - An internal number
representing a time series.
# Data
provided for site
02105500
# TS_ID Parameter
Description
# 89679 00065
Gage height, feet
# Data
-value qualification
codes included in this output:
#
P Provisional data
subject to revision.
agency_cd
site no
datetime tz_cd
89679_00065
89679_00065_cd
5s
15s 20d
6s 14n 10s
USGS
02105500
2022-09-13 23:00
EDT
2.18
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-13 23:15
EDT
2.18
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-13 23:30
EDT
2.18
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-13 23:45
EDT
2.17
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 00:00
EDT
2.17
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 00:15
EDT
2.17
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 00:30
EDT
2.16
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 00:45
EDT
2.16
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 01:00
EDT
2.16
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 01:15
EDT
2.15
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 01:30
EDT
2.15
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 01:45
EDT
2.15
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 02:00
EDT
2.14
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 02:15
EDT
2.14
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 02:30
EDT
2.14
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 02:45
EDT
2.14
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 03:00
EDT
2.14
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 03:15
EDT
2.13
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 03:30
EDT
2.13
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 03:45
EDT
2.13
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 04:00
EDT
2.12
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 04:15
EDT
2.12
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 04:30
EDT
2.12
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 04:45
EDT
2.11
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 05:00
EDT
2.11
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 05:15
EDT
2.10
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 05:30
EDT
2.10
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 05:45
EDT
2.10
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 06:00
EDT
2.10
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 06:15
EDT
2.09
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 06:30
EDT
2.08
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 06:45
EDT
2.08
P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14 07:00
EDT
2.08
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 07:15
EDT
2.07
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 07:30
EDT
2.07
P
USGS
02105SOO
2022-09-14 07:45
EDT
2.07
P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
08:00
EDT
2.06 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
08:15
EDT
2.06 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
08:30
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
08:45
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
09:00
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
09:15
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
09:30
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
09:45
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
10:00
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
10:15
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
10:30
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
10:45
EDT
2.05 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
11:00
EDT
2.04 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
11:15
EDT
2.03 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
11:30
EDT
2.04 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
11:45
EDT
2.03 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
12:00
EDT
2.03 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
12:15
EDT
2.02 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
12:30
EDT
2.03 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
12:45
EDT
2.02 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
13:00
EDT
2.02 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
13:15
EDT
2.01 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
13:30
EDT
2.01 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
13:45
EDT
2.01 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
14:00
EDT
2.00 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
14:15
EDT
2.00 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
14:30
EDT
2.00 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
14:45
EDT
2.00 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
15:00
EDT
2.00 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
15:15
EDT
1.99 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
15:30
EDT
1.99 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
15:45
EDT
1.98 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
16:00
EDT
1.97 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
16:15
EDT
1.97 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
16:30
EDT
1.96 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
16:45
EDT
1.96 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
17:00
EDT
1.95 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
17:15
EDT
1.94 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
17:30
EDT
1.93 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
17:45
EDT
1.93 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
18:00
EDT
1.92 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
18:15
EDT
1.91 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
18:30
EDT
1.90 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
18:45
EDT
1.90 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
19:00
EDT
1.89 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
19:15
EDT
1.89 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
19:30
EDT
1.88 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
19:45
EDT
1.87 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
20:00
EDT
1.87 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
20:15
EDT
1.86 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
20:30
EDT
1.86 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
20:45
EDT
1.86 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
21:00
EDT
1.85 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
21:15
EDT
1.85 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
21:30
EDT
1.85 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
21:45
EDT
1.84 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
22:00
EDT
1.84 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
22:15
EDT
1.84 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
22:30
EDT
1.83 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
22:45
EDT
1.83 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
23:00
EDT
1.83 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
23:15
EDT
1.82 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
23:30
EDT
1.82 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-14
23:45
EDT
1.82 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
00:00
EDT
1.81 P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
00:15
EDT
1.81 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
00:30
EDT
1.81 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
00:45
EDT
1.80 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
01:00
EDT
1.80 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
01:15
EDT
1.80 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
01:30
EDT
1.80 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
01:45
EDT
1.79 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
02:00
EDT
1.79 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
02:15
EDT
1.79 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
02:30
EDT
1.79 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
02:45
EDT
1.79 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
03:00
EDT
1.78 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
03:15
EDT
1.78 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
03:30
EDT
1.78 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
03:45
EDT
1.77 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
04:00
EDT
1.78 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
04:15
EDT
1.77 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
04:30
EDT
1.77 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
04:45
EDT
1.77 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
05:00
EDT
1.76 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
05:15
EDT
1.76 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
05:30
EDT
1.76 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
05:45
EDT
1.76 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
06:00
EDT
1.76 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
06:15
EDT
1.76 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
06:30
EDT
1.75 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
06:45
EDT
1.75 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
07:00
EDT
1.75 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
07:15
EDT
1.75 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
07:30
EDT
1.75 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
07:45
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
08:00
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
08:15
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
08:30
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
08:45
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
09:00
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
09:15
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
09:30
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
09:45
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
10:00
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
10:15
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
10:30
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
10:45
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
11:00
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
11:15
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
11:30
EDT
1.75 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
11:45
EDT
1.75 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
12:00
EDT
1.76 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
12:15
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
12:30
EDT
1.77 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
12:45
EDT
1.73 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
13:00
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
13:15
EDT
1.73 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
13:30
EDT
1.74 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
13:45
EDT
1.73 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
14:00
EDT
1.73 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
14:15
EDT
1.72 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
14:30
EDT
1.72 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
14:45
EDT
1.72 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
15:00
EDT
1.73 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
15:15
EDT
1.73 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
15:30
EDT
1.72 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
15:45
EDT
1.72 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
16:00
EDT
1.70 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
16:15
EDT
1.69 P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
16:30
EDT
1.69 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
16:45
EDT
1.70 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
17:00
EDT
1.69 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
17:15
EDT
1.68 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
17:30
EDT
1.69 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
17:45
EDT
1.67 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
18:00
EDT
1.66 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
18:15
EDT
1.67 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
18:30
EDT
1.66 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
18:45
EDT
1.65 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
19:00
EDT
1.65 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
19:15
EDT
1.64 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
19:30
EDT
1.64 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
19:45
EDT
1.63 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
20:00
EDT
1.63 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
20:15
EDT
1.63 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
20:30
EDT
1.62 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
20:45
EDT
1.62 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
21:00
EDT
1.62 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
21:15
EDT
1.61 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
21:30
EDT
1.61 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
21:45
EDT
1.61 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
22:00
EDT
1.60 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
22:15
EDT
1.60 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
22:30
EDT
1.60 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
22:45
EDT
1.59 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
23:00
EDT
1.60 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
23:15
EDT
1.59 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
23:30
EDT
1.59 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-15
23:45
EDT
1.59 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
00:00
EDT
1.58 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
00:15
EDT
1.58 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
00:30
EDT
1.58 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
00:45
EDT
1.57 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
01:00
EDT
1.58 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
01:15
EDT
1.57 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
01:30
EDT
1.57 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
01:45
EDT
1.57 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
02:00
EDT
1.57 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
02:15
EDT
1.57 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
02:30
EDT
1.56 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
02:45
EDT
1.56 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
03:00
EDT
1.56 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
03:15
EDT
1.55 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
03:30
EDT
1.55 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
03:45
EDT
1.55 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
04:00
EDT
1.54 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
04:15
EDT
1.55 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
04:30
EDT
1.54 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
04:45
EDT
1.54 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
05:00
EDT
1.54 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
05:15
EDT
1.53 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
05:30
EDT
1.53 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
05:45
EDT
1.53 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
06:00
EDT
1.53 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
06:15
EDT
1.52 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
06:30
EDT
1.52 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
06:45
EDT
1.52 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
07:00
EDT
1.52 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
07:15
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
07:30
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
07:45
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
08:00
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
08:15
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
08:30
EDT
1.50 P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
08:45
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
09:00
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
09:15
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
09:30
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
09:45
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
10:00
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
10:15
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
10:30
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
10:45
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
11:00
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
11:15
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
11:30
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
11:45
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
12:00
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
12:15
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
12:30
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
12:45
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
13:00
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
13:15
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
13:30
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
13:45
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
14:00
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
14:15
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
14:30
EDT
1.51 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
14:45
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
15:00
EDT
1.49 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
15:15
EDT
1.49 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
15:30
EDT
1.50 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
15:45
EDT
1.49 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
16:00
EDT
1.49 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
16:15
EDT
1.49 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
16:30
EDT
1.49 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
16:45
EDT
1.48 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
17:00
EDT
1.48 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
17:15
EDT
1.47 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
17:30
EDT
1.47 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
17:45
EDT
1.47 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
18:00
EDT
1.46 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
18:15
EDT
1.46 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
18:30
EDT
1.46 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
18:45
EDT
1.45 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
19:00
EDT
1.45 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
19:15
EDT
1.45 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
19:30
EDT
1.45 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
19:45
EDT
1.44 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
20:00
EDT
1.44 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
20:15
EDT
1.44 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
20:30
EDT
1.44 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
20:45
EDT
1.43 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
21:00
EDT
1.43 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
21:15
EDT
1.43 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
21:30
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
21:45
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
22:00
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
22:15
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
22:30
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
22:45
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
23:00
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
23:15
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
23:30
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-16
23:45
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
00:00
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
00:15
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
00:30
EDT
1.41 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
00:45
EDT
1.41 P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
01:00
EDT
1.41 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
01:15
EDT
1.41 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
01:30
EDT
1.41 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
01:45
EDT
1.42 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
02:00
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
02:15
EDT
1.41 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
02:30
EDT
1.41 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
02:45
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
03:00
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
03:15
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
03:30
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
03:45
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
04:00
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
04:15
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
04:30
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
04:45
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
05:00
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
05:15
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
05:30
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
05:45
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
06:00
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
06:15
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
06:30
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
06:45
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
07:00
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
07:15
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
07:30
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
07:45
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
08:00
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
08:15
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
08:30
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
08:45
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
09:00
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
09:15
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
09:30
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
09:45
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
10:00
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
10:15
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
10:30
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
10:45
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
11:00
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
11:15
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
11:30
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
11:45
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
12:00
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
12:15
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
12:30
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
12:45
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
13:00
EDT
1.40 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
13:15
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
13:30
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
13:45
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
14:00
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
14:15
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
14:30
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
14:45
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
15:00
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
15:15
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
15:30
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
15:45
EDT
1.39 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
16:00
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
16:15
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
16:30
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
16:45
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
17:00
EDT
1.37 P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
17:15
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
17:30
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
17:45
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
18:00
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
18:15
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
18:30
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
18:45
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
19:00
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
19:15
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
19:30
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
19:45
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
20:00
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
20:15
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
20:30
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
20:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
21:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
21:15
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
21:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
21:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
22:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
22:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
22:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
22:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
23:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
23:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
23:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-17
23:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
00:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
00:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
00:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
00:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
01:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
01:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
01:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
01:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
02:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
02:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
02:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
02:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
03:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
03:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
03:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
03:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
04:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
04:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
04:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
04:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
05:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
05:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
05:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
05:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
06:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
06:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
06:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
06:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
07:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
07:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
07:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
07:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
08:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
08:15
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
08:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
08:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
09:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
09:15
EDT
1.35 P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
09:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
09:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
10:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
10:15
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
10:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
10:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
11:00
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
11:15
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
11:30
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
11:45
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
12:00
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
12:15
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
12:30
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
12:45
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
13:00
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
13:15
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
13:30
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
13:45
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
14:00
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
14:15
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
14:30
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
14:45
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
15:00
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
15:15
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
15:30
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
15:45
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
16:00
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
16:15
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
16:30
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
16:45
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
17:00
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
17:15
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
17:30
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
17:45
EDT
1.38 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
18:00
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
18:15
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
18:30
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
18:45
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
19:00
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
19:15
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
19:30
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
19:45
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
20:00
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
20:15
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
20:30
EDT
1.37 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
20:45
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
21:00
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
21:15
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
21:30
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
21:45
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
22:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
22:15
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
22:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
22:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
23:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
23:15
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
23:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-18
23:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
00:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
00:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
00:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
00:45
EDT
1.36 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
01:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
01:15
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
01:30
EDT
1.35 P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
01:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
02:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
02:15
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
02:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
02:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
03:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
03:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
03:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
03:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
04:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
04:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
04:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
04:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
05:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
05:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
05:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
05:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
06:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
06:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
06:30
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
06:45
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
07:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
07:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
07:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
07:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
08:00
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
08:15
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
08:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
08:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
09:00
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
09:15
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
09:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
09:45
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
10:00
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
10:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
10:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
10:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
11:00
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
11:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
11:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
11:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
12:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
12:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
12:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
12:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
13:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
13:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
13:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
13:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
14:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
14:15
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
14:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
14:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
15:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
15:15
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
15:30
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
15:45
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
16:00
EDT
1.35 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
16:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
16:30
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
16:45
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
17:00
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
17:15
EDT
1.34 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
17:30
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
17:45
EDT
1.33 P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
18:00
EDT
1.33 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
18:15
EDT
1.32 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
18:30
EDT
1.32 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
18:45
EDT
1.32 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
19:00
EDT
1.32 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
19:15
EDT
1.32 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
19:30
EDT
1.31 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
19:45
EDT
1.31 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
20:00
EDT
1.31 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
20:15
EDT
1.31 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
20:30
EDT
1.31 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
20:45
EDT
1.31 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
21:00
EDT
1.30 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
21:15
EDT
1.30 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
21:30
EDT
1.30 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
21:45
EDT
1.29 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
22:00
EDT
1.29 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
22:15
EDT
1.29 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
22:30
EDT
1.29 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
22:45
EDT
1.29 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
23:00
EDT
1.28 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
23:15
EDT
1.28 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
23:30
EDT
1.28 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-19
23:45
EDT
1.28 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
00:00
EDT
1.28 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
00:15
EDT
1.27 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
00:30
EDT
1.27 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
00:45
EDT
1.27 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
01:00
EDT
1.27 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
01:15
EDT
1.26 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
01:30
EDT
1.26 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
01:45
EDT
1.26 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
02:00
EDT
1.26 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
02:15
EDT
1.26 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
02:30
EDT
1.26 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
02:45
EDT
1.26 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
03:00
EDT
1.25 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
03:15
EDT
1.25 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
03:30
EDT
1.25 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
03:45
EDT
1.24 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
04:00
EDT
1.24 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
04:15
EDT
1.25 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
04:30
EDT
1.24 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
04:45
EDT
1.24 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
05:00
EDT
1.24 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
05:15
EDT
1.24 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
05:30
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
05:45
EDT
1.24 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
06:00
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
06:15
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
06:30
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
06:45
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
07:00
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
07:15
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
07:30
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
07:45
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
08:00
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
08:15
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
08:30
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
08:45
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
09:00
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
09:15
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
09:30
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
09:45
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
10:00
EDT
1.22 P

USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
10:15
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
10:30
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
10:45
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
11:00
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
11:15
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
11:30
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
11:45
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
12:00
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
12:15
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
12:30
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
12:45
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
13:00
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
13:15
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
13:30
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
13:45
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
14:00
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
14:15
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
14:30
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
14:45
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
15:00
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
15:15
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
15:30
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
15:45
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
16:00
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
16:15
EDT
1.23 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
16:30
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
16:45
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
17:00
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
17:15
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
17:30
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
17:45
EDT
1.21 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
18:00
EDT
1.22 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
18:15
EDT
1.21 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
18:30
EDT
1.21 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
18:45
EDT
1.21 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
19:00
EDT
1.21 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
19:15
EDT
1.21 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
19:30
EDT
1.21 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
19:45
EDT
1.21 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
20:00
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
20:15
EDT
1.21 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
20:30
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
20:45
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
21:00
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
21:15
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
21:30
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
21:45
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
22:00
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
22:15
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
22:30
EDT
1.20 P
USGS
02105500
2022-09-20
22:45
EDT
1.20 P

Appendix E
Antecedent Precipitation Tool Report

C N
� O
N
V N
� N
> N
O N
Z �
N
U N
O�
D_N
� N
IJ1 N
� N
Q �
N
N
O
C N
� N
O
T N
� N
z O
t_ N
O.N
Q NN
L N
� N
9 N
� N
w �
m
aai
a)
v
C
Q
T
O
rl
O
Z
T
(6
O
4�
a
rn�
m
m
m
In
w
m
r
rl
N
�
ri
m
ul
�
M
N
I�
r
O
Il
'-I
I
�
h
O
rl
rl
N
N
tD
CP
a)
t0
m
M
Il)
-1:
l0
ui
NI
O
-
m
-
n
-
�t
r
m
�t
i6
�
M
N
01
m
01
O
rl
N
rl
Itl
a)
w
Em
I9
N
l0
N
o m
�
....
O!
Ill
r-
+1
N
n
Ol
l0
11
aj
u
n
o
m
m
11
o
m
C
i
N
cR
O
N
N
IR
C
l0
m
o
O)
o
m
�
O
m
T
rl
'-I
C51
O
tD
m
rl
aj
a,
W
�
rn
m
m
io
r`
ui
m
In
i
m
II1
m
ul
O
N
o
m
c6
o m
m
m
O
C
m
m
m
h
m
m
m
M
-6
m
r
m
r
I�
-
m
r
r
m
r
I�,
o
O
w
LL
O
ul
01
U
N
01
In
m
m
In
m
m
N
O
r-I
r-I
to
N
In
m
m
jr`
Oi
rn
UR
a
a
m
ro
rn
a
M
M
M
v
U❑
w
In
w
V)
w
In
w
LnQ
a
z
E
16
JJ
J
Ul
M
Ln
N
J
O
F
Z
d
W
O
C6
O
�l
Z
d'
C
w
6
n
m
r4
(.7
w
m
.�
;
O
J
J
j
V
W
w
Q
W
a
L
O=
W
W
W
t
>
7
O
o
r
r
�
lQt_
J
=
=
W
W
IQL
Q
(S@gDUI) IlpJuip�l

Appendix F
Soil Profile Descriptions for
Chemours Site: S&EC

Environmental Consultants,
8=412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 - Phone: [phone]
sandec.com
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. September 23, 2022
Attn: Beau Hodge S&EC Job #15424.S1
2501 Blue Ridge Rd, Suite 430
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Soil Profile Descriptions for Chemours Site, Fayetteville, NC.
Dear Mr. Hodge:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA was contacted to conduct soil profile descriptions at the
wetland determination data point locations provided by Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. Hand auger
borings were advanced at the pre -selected locations to sufficient depth for the determination of
the presence or absence of hydric soil indicators. The soil borings were described using
techniques outlined in the "Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils, Version 3" published
by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS, 2012).
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA is pleased to be of service in this matter and we look
forward to assisting in the successful completion of the project. If requested, S&EC can meet
on -site with regulatory agencies to discuss our findings and recommendations. Please feel free
to call with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
�In Lewis
NC Licensed Soil Scientist #1345
Encl: Soil Boring Profile Descriptions
SOIL S�f
SiAl
y-A
U1 s ..
�� 1345 U
�F N0 RTt� 1
q/2J/z 2

x
4�
E
O
s a)
to
U Q
N
4 ,
O
C
— -�
`�°
z
a�
E
'x
c
O
a
a
Q
�
u
x
x
U
c7
G
C
O
4�
m
U
O
J
to
7
m
N
a)
Q
L.L
U
s
a
O
E
X
10
O
N
O
E
i
O
O
U
o
O
c-I
X Z
cI
i O
O
jj U E
O
c-I
O
O
�
N
O
dA
�
=
Q
O
4-
CD
m
U
o
s
4 � a�
as
U
E
r�I
cm
O

c
c
o
O
4
+1
c
+1
c
N
u
u
a-,
C
C
O
O
O
Z
N
N
C
C
C
C
E
E
E
E
O
O
U
U
N
E
E
7
0
m
N
O
cn
U
C
O
co
U
O
J
N
7
f6
�
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U
U
O
X
o
O
O
O
N
c
a�
O
LO
LO
O
cr-
cr-
O
U1
LO
U
ri
o
O
O
Ol
m
X +,
N
O
4�
O
LO
U E
L
v
O
N
c-I
O
O
�
N
0
O
CL
O
4-
Q
Co
m
U
s
4 � a�
U
as
a� c
—I
O
v
m
o

a�
0
z
E
O
f6
X
J
U
c
c co
O
cn
cn
C
O
co
U
O
J
N
7
f6
�
Q
U-
U
s
a
O
E
X
o
O
N
c
a�
O
E
i
O
O
U
O
o
O
c-I
c-I
m
to
X
'c 0
0 0 0
U E
LO
LO
O
O
�
N
0
O
O
4-
Q
Co
m
U
s
4 � a�
as
UUD
a�
-I
O
v
m
o
I�

c
O
c�
41
c
U
�
O
0
Z
N
C
C
O
E
E
O
U
N
E
`
E
�
O
x
J
O
�
�
f6
cn
U
C
O
4�
m
U
O
J
N
7
m
N
a)
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U
O
X
o
O
O
cI
N
c
a�
O
E
QD
O
cr-
O
>-
U
LO
O
o
O
cI
m
X Z
i
� O •n
O
U E
>-
>-
O
O
c-I
c-I
m
�
o
O
a
o
E
=
CL
O
Q
m
m
U
s
4 � a�
as
UUD
a� c
-I
O
v
m
o

c
O
4-1
c�
c
o
c
4�
a)
U
4�
4�
C
C
O
C
O
z
u
U
a)
C
O
E O
a)
C
C
O
O 4'
E
E a)
U
Ui
U
U
7
E
4�JO
U
O
�
f6
cn
f6 O
cn J
U
C
O
�
U
J
O
�
N
7
m
(1)
(1)
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U
U
U
O
X
o
O
O
N
LO
cI
(1)
c
a�
O
E
(.D
(.D
(.D
Ln
�t
Ln
O
O
>-
>-
>-
U
Ln
Ln
Ln
0
00
O Ln
O
Ol
r, N
m
X Z
r m
O
Ln
o
U E
Ln
O O
O
m
O
O
a
0
p
ci
N
2
Q
0�0
w
O
4�
Q
Co
Co
m
U
o
s
+J a)
as
QD
• �
� U
Q �
N
c-I
i
CD
O
I�
ci

a�
0
z
E
O
f6
X
J
U
c
c co
O
cn
cn
C
O
co
U
O
J
N
7
f6
�
Q
U-
U
s
a
O
E
X
o
O
N
c
a�
O
E
i
O
O
U
o
O
O
c-I
c-I
X Z
i
•i O .`^
4'
Lo
O
jj U E
c-I
c-I
O
O
d
�
O
E
2
Q
4�
O
4�
Q
Co
m
U
s
4� a�
U
Q- s
,n
U
O
cI
m
O
cI

c
O
a2 a)
Q U
N �
4�
E Ln
O
7
z
O
a�
E o
o
E
E
O ca
U
a�
0
X
N
f6
f6
U
U
C
O
4�
m
U
O
J
to
7
f6
�
Q
L.L
U
�
s
a
o
0
X
o
O
O
N
N
c
a�
O
E
�
O
O
O
O
U
r-i
o
O
O
00
c-I
x Z
•i O .`n
4'
Ln
Ln
O
U E
>-
>-
O
O
c-I
c-I
Ln
O
O
d
O
E
2
Q
0
O
4�
Q
Co
m
U
o
s
4� a)
as
w
a� c
o
O
v
�
m
o
�o

E o
a
s +�
O
3
z
) U
O
_ U
f6 E
Q
O
O �
u- E
7
�
X
U
E
C (6
c6 O
(n J
C
O
4-
m
U
O
J
N
7
m
N
Q)
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U U
O
X
o
O O
O
N N
N
O
m Qo
LO �t
= �
O
U
N I�
o
O
QD
X Z
N
•i O
LO
U E
>-
O
c-I
L
O
O
d
O
Q
C
=
Q
O
4=
cm
m
U
s
4 � a�
as
U
chi
O
cm
O

c
O
4-1
c�
c
U
C
O
E
O
U
7
Z
Ev�
E
C
O
'p
E a=
E
o
O �
>
E a�
E c
O
U u
N
E
4�
f6
o
E
O
J
U
U
C
O
4�
m
U
J
O
J
N
7
f6
�
Q
U-
U
�
s
Q
U
U
O
X
o
O
O
O
rl
N
c
a�
O
E
r
m
�
o
o
>-
}
U
Ln
Ln
o
O
O
O
rl
l0
m
X 4'
rl
rl
i
Ln
0 0 o
m
�U E
c
>-
O
O
Ln
rl
rl
N
Ln
O
O
d
0
p
rl
N
E
2
Q
0
w
O
4�
Q
Co
Co
m
U
s
4� a�
w
as
00
U
Q
N
rl
i
O
m
c1
N
m
o
m
ri

a1
E
o
=3
z
16 N
a) C:
E O
�
c
O +'
E
E c
O O
U u
a)
E
4�
to
O
N
H
�
U
C
O
4�
m
U
J
O
J
cc
d G
N
7
f6
�
a)
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U U
O
X
o
O O
O
a)
c
a�
O
E
QD W
�t QD
O
cr- cr-
O
>- >-
U
Lo Lo
o
O
00
X Z
N
•i O
4�
O
U E
>-
O
c-I
m
Ln
O
O
a
o
c
=
Q
o
m
m
U
o
s
4� a�
as
UUD
U
chi
O
m
O

a�
0
z
E
O
f6
X
J
U
c
c co
O
cn
cn
C
O
co
U
O
J
N
7
f6
�
Q
U-
U
s
a
O
E
X
o
O
N
c
a�
O
E
i
O
O
U
O
o
O
c-I
c-I
i
.i L
O .
LO
M O
U E
LO
O
O
d
O
C
=
4.
O
4�
Q
Co
m
U
s
4 � a�
as
UUD
a�
N
c�I
O
v
m
O
N

a�
0
z
�
u
x
x
U
c7
G
C
O
4�
U
U
J
O
J
to
7
m
N
Q)
Q
L.L
U
s
Q
U
O
E
X
o
O
Ln
N
c
a�
O
QD
LO
i
cr-
O
O
�?
U
I�
o
Lo
m
X Z
-1
•i O
4�
O
U E
c-I
O
O
d
O
C
=
Q
O
4=
co
m
U
o
s
4� a�
as
UUD
U
chi
O
co
O

a�
0
z
E
O
X
J
C
f6
N
C
O
4�
m
U
O
J
N
7
f6
�
a)
Q
U-
U
s
a
O
E
X
o
O
a)
c
a�
O
E
i
O
O
U
O
o
c-I
(.D
X
'i O vn
Io
M O O
U E
LO
co
O
O
d
O
E
2
O
4=
Q
m
U
o
s
4 � a)
as
UUD
U
Q E
m
O
iI
cm
O

a1
E
o
=3
z
16 N
a) C:
E O
�
c
O +'
E
E c
O O
U u
X
U
E
C (6
m O
(n J
C
O
4-
m
U
O
J
N
7
m
(1)
a)
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U
O
X
o
O
O
.�
a)
c
a�
O
E
QD
�
O
cr-
O
>-
U
Lo
o
O
m
X Z
N
•i O
4�
O
U E
>-
O
c-I
Ol
�
O
O
d
O
2
c�
O
4=
Q
m
U
o
s
4 � a�
as
UUD
U
chi
O
cm
O

c
O
c0
41
c
U
C
E
O
O
7
(1)
z
0
0
E �
U
�
C
C
O c
O
E N
E
E c
E
O O
O
U u
U
N
E
U
E
O
co O
cn J
U
C
O
4�
m
U
J
O
J
N
7
m
N
(1)
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U
U
O
X
o
O
O
O
N
N
c
a�
O
E
QD
�
�
O
cr-
cr-
O
>-
>-
U
Lo
LO
o
O
O
00
l0
x Z
N
N
O • `n
4'
O
U E
c-I
c-I
Ol
�
O
O
d
�
O
O
4�
cm
cm
m
U
s
4� a�
as
UUD
a� u
00
O
; ,
1
m
o
00

a�
0
z
E
O
X
J
C
f6
N
C
O
4�
m
U
O
J
N
7
f6
�
Q)
Q
U-
U
s
a
O
E
X
o
O
N
c
a�
O
E
i
O
O
U
O
o
c-I
X Z
i
i O
O
U E
>-
O
c-I
O
rl
O
�
N
O
Co
O
4-
Q
m
U
o
s
4 � a�
as
UUD
U
E
r�I
cm
O

a�
a1
E
a�
o
=3
z
i
�
N C:
U
E O
4
O
O c
O
E N
E u
7
O O
u
U u
N
�
7
4�
N
x
E
m
O
J
C
O
4-
m
U
O
J
N
7
m
N
Q)
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U
O
X
o
O
O
N
N
c
a�
O
E
QD
�t
i
cr-
O
O
�?
U
I�
o
O
O
00
c-I
x Z
N
N
i O • `�
4'
Il
O
jj U E
>-
>-
O
O
c-I
c-I
rl
C
rl
O
�
N
O
ci
N
O
4�
Q
Q
m
U
s
4 � a�
as
UUD
u
LO
O
m
o
rn

c
O
4-1
c0
c
N
E
O
7
Ou
z
� �
c
o
v=
�
c
c
o c
o
E (1)
E
E c
E
O o
O
U u
U
N
7
E
O
U
X
U
cn J
C
O
co
U
O
J
N
7
f6
�
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U
U
O
X
o
O
O
c-I
LO
N
c
a�
O
E
(.D
(.D
i
LO
LO
O
cr-
cr-
O
>-
>-
U
Lo
LO
o
O
LO
m
m
x Z
N
cI
� O •n
\
\
O
U E
>-
>-
O
O
c-I
c-I
0
rl
C
rl
O
�
N
O
cI
N
O
4�
CD
CD
m
U
o
s
4 � a�
as
w
a) c
LO
O
v
00
�
m
0
00

a�
0
z
E
O
f6
X
J
U
c
c co
O
cn
cn
C
O
co
U
O
J
N
7
f6
�
Q
U-
U
s
a
O
E
X
o
O
N
c
a�
O
E
i
O
O
U
o
O
O
c-I
c-I
i
L .i
O .
LO
M O
U E
LO
N
�
ci
O
�
N
0
O
E
=
Q
4-
O
4-
Q
Co
m
U
s
4 � a�
as
UUD
c
m
o
O
v
Q
m
o
Qo

c a�
� c
a
Q- O
m E
-0
4
O U
� � o
c "
� +�
U
ao +� c
L
L a) U
C
f
= 3 O
L
co
�
u
x
x
U
c7
G
C
O
4�
m
U
O
J
J
d
7
4-1
m
a)
a)
Q
U-
U
s
Q
U
O
E
X
o
O
LO
a)
c
a�
O
QD
O
O
O
O
U
o
Lo
m
X Z
c I
L
's O `n
O
jj U E
c-I
m
�
�
o
�
N
0
O
�
=
Q
O
4-
co
m
U
s
+1 a)
as
UUD
U
chi
O
co
O

c
a�
ao
0
v,
uN
U
O
0
i
z
4
co o
a o
co a�
4
co 7
�
u
x
x
U
c7
G
C
O
4�
m
U
O
J
N
7
(o
N
(1)
Q
U-
U
s
a
O
E
X
10
O
N
O
E
i
O
O
U
O
o
c-I
X Z
N
i O
O
U E
c-I
m
�
�
o
�
N
0
O
�
=
Q
O
CD
f6
U
�
�
s
+�
a C
� U
u
E
r�I
CD
O

O
O
4
O
z
c
a�
ao
0
4
x
x
�
U
c7
G
C
O
4�
m
U
O
J
N
7
m
N
Q)
Q
U-
U
s
a
O
E
X
10
O
N
O
E
i
O
O
U
O
o
c-I
X Z
cI
i O
O
U E
O
c-I
0
m
rI
O
�
N
O
Q
O
4-
cm
m
U
o
s
4 � a�
as
U
E
r�I
cm
O

a�
0
z
E
O
X
J
C
f6
N
C
O
4�
m
U
O
J
N
7
f6
�
Q)
Q
U-
U
s
a
O
E
X
o
O
N
c
a�
O
E
i
O
O
U
O
o
-i
X Z
00
•i O
4�
\
O
U E
>-
O
c-I
rl
O
�
N
O
O
4-
Q
m
U
o
s
4� a�
as
UUD
U
m
Q E
iI
O
cm
O