NC0024244_Fact Sheet_20230127

NCO024244
Fact Sheet
NPDES Permit No. NCO024244
Permit Writer/Email Contact: Gary Perlmutter, [e-mail]
Date: January 23, 2023
Division/Branch: NC Division of Water Resources/NPDES Municipal Permitting Unit
Fact Sheet Template: Version 08Sept2016
Permitting Action:
❑X Renewal A*
❑ Renewal with Expansion
❑ New Discharge
❑ Modification (Fact Sheet should be tailored to mod request)
Note: A complete application should include the following:
• For New Dischargers, EPA Form 2A or 2D requirements, Engineering Alternatives Analysis, Fee
• For Existing Dischargers (POTW), EPA Form 2A, 3 effluent pollutant scans, 4 2nd species WET
tests.
• For Existing Dischargers (Non-POTW), EPA Form 2C with correct analytical requirements based
on industry category.
Complete applicable sections below. If not applicable, enter NA.
1. Basic Facility Information
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
City of Albemarle / Long Creek WWTP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 190, Albemarle, NC 28002
Facility Address:
1040 Coble Avenue, Albemarle, NC 28001
Permitted Flow:
12.0 / 16.0 MGD
Facility Type/Waste:
MAJOR Municipal / 97% domestic; 3% industrial'
Facility Class:
Grade IV
Treatment Units:
Bar screen, Grit removal, Activated sludge, Secondary clarifiers,
Tertiary filters, Chlorination, Dechlorination, Sludge dewatering,
Digesters.
Pretreatment Program (Y/N)
Yes
County:
Stanly
Region
Mooresville
Footnote.
1. The facility has an active pretreatment program with 3 industrial users, none currently significant. Permitted industrial
flows provided by the ORC.
Page 1 of 21

NC0024244
Briefly describe theproposedpermitting action andfacility background: The City of Albemarle has applied
for NPDES permit renewal, and submitted a renewal application dated August 24, 2021, received by the
Division on September 03, 2021. Review of the application found it incomplete with effluent pollutant
scans (PPAs), second species test reports, process narrative, sludge management plan and chemical
addendum lacking. The PPAs and 2ad species test reports were received by request on 10/28/2022; the PPAs
were sampled in October 2019, September 2020 and June 2021; the 2nd species tests were sampled in June,
September, October, and December 2021.
At the time of application submission, the facility served a population of—17,810 residents including the
City of Albemarle (pop.—15,980), Town of New London (pop. —600), and unincorporated Stanly County
(pop. —1230). The facility has an active pretreatment program involving 3 industrial users: two textile
facilities and the Albemarle City Landfill; one of the textile facilities was a Significant Industrial User that
was dropped in September 2021 due to ceasing dyeing operations.
The wastewater treatment process is in two facilities located —0.9 miles apart. The upper plant is largely
retired but has an active headworks (bar screen and grit removal), influent lift station, and primary and
secondary solids holding basins. The lower plant comprises the remainder of the treatment process,
including aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, tertiary filters, chlorine disinfection and the outfall to Long
Creek.
The facility had entered a Special Order by Consent, SOC WQ S 19-007, effective October 1, 2020 —
December 31, 2023, as it can neither consistently comply with NPDES permit BOD, TSS, Ammonia and
Fecal Coliform limits nor Collection System Permit WQCS00016 conditions regarding sewer system
overflows. The SOC was replaced with SOC WQ S 19-007 Ad I in October 2022, expiring August 31, 2026,
extending deadlines for scheduled activities and interim compliance limits for BOD, TSS, Ammonia and
Fecal Coliform, with the compliance date of May 31, 2026. The SOCs allow time for the City to make
improvements to both its collection system and wastewater treatment plant and operate under interim permit
limits for the above parameters.
With the application, the City requested changes to the permit regarding the compliance schedule for
Cadmium and Chromium IV, as well as a request to remove Color monitoring, following up from a letter
request sent in February 2020. These items will be discussed in Section 6 - Water Quality -Based Effluent
Limits (WQBEL) below.
Sludge management. From correspondence with the ORC on 10/28/2022: `The plant is currently under an
SOC (WQ 519-007) for "the wwtp's inability to handle low influent BOD concentrations ". The said low
BOD concentrations inhibit biosolids production. Historically biosolids have been pump/hauled to Rocky
River Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant which is operated by the Water & Sewer Authority of Cabarrus
County. '
Page 2 of 21

NC0024244
2. Receiving Waterbody Information:
Receiving Waterbody Information
Outfalls/Receiving Stream(s):
Outfall 001 / Long Creek
Stream Segment:
13-17-31
Stream Classification
C
Drainage Area (mi):
64
Summer 7Q 10 (cfs)
1.6
Winter 7Q 10 (cfs):
9.5
Average Flow (cfs):
64
IWC (% effluent):
92.08% at12 MGD and 93.94% at16 MGD
2022 NC 303(d) listed/parameter:
Copper (7 µg/l, AL, FW) 1
Subject to TMDL/parameter:
Statewide Mercury TMDL
Subbasin/HUC:
03-07-13 / 03040105
USGS Topo Quad:
F18SW Albemarle
Footnote.
1. Total Copper impairment at the stream segment —9 miles downstream from the outfall; impairment based
on a Legacy Category 5 Total Metals Assessment in 2008.
3. Effluent Data Summary
Effluent data are summarized below for the period October 2018 through September 2022. The plant was
operating under SOC WQ S 19-007, issued and effective October 1, 2020 and expiring December 31, 2023,
with modified limits in effect until September 30, 2023, extended to May 31, 2026 under SOC WQ S19-
007 Ad I. Summary data are in two tables: one under SOC limits (Table 1), and one under permit limits
(Table 2).
Table 1. Effluent Data Summary under SOC-modified limits (October 2020 — September 2022).
Parameter
Units
Average
Max
Min
Limits 1
BOD summer 2
mg/L
4.3
21.0
< 2.0
MA = 15.0
WA = 35.0
BOD winter
mg/L
14.k,
< 2.0
MA = 25.0
WA = 35.0
TSS
mg/L
121
1
MA = 35.0
WA = 50.0
NH3-N
mg/L
MA = 5.0
WA = 15.0
= 400 3
Fecal Coliform
#/100
1).:)
WA
WA = 800 3
Footnotes on next naQe.
Page 3 of 21

NCO024244
Footnotes.
1. MA = Monthly Average; WA = Weekly Average; DM = Daily Maximum.
2. Summer = April 1 - October 31; winter = November 1 - March 31.
3. Geometric mean.
Table 2. Effluent Data Summary under permit limits (October 2018 - September 2022).
Parameter
-7
Units
Average
Max
Min
Limits'
Flow
MGD
5.46
22.68
1.54
MA = 12.0
BOD summer 2,3
mg/L
8.9
38.1
< 2.0
MA = 10.0
WA = 15.0
BOD winter 2,3
mg/L
14.0
46.0
2.7
MA = 20.0
WA = 30.0
BOD removal
%
82.5
98.9
-242.9
> 85
TSS 2
mg/L
22.4
105
3.6
MA = 30.0
WA = 45.0
TSS removal
%
73.3
87.8
-376
> 85
NH3-N summer 2, 3
mg/L
1.27
11.54
0.01
MA = 2.0
WA = 6.0
N113-N winter 2,3
mg/L
5.36
13.28
0.02
MA = 4.0
WA = 12.0
DO
mg/L
8.38
13.5
3.0
> 5.0
Fecal Coliform2,4
#/100 mL
24
> 8100
< I
MA = 200/100
WA = 400/100
Total Residual
µg/L
19
47
12
DM = 18 5
Chlorine (TRC)
Temperature
°C
19
28
7
Total Nitrogen
mg/L
13.75
30.77
2.80
Total Phosphorus
mg/L
1.28
4.61
0.19
Conductivity
µmhos/cm
332
637
102
Total Hardness
mg/L
48.3
77
22.6
Total Cadmium 6
µg/L
0.63
1.5
< 0.5
MA = 1.12
DM = 6.62
Total Chromium
µg/L
5.4
7
3
Chromium VI
µg/L
0.97
5.22
0.01
MA = 11.9
DM = 17.2
Total Copper 6
µg/L
19.8
53
5
MA = 16.09
DM = 22.52
[Total Silver
ng/L
1.7
5.0
0.8
Page 4 of 21

NCO024244
Parameter
Units
Average
Max
Min
Limits'
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
µg/L
3.09
< 10
< 2
Color
ADMI
22
43
12
PH
SU
6.8
8.1
6.0
6.0-9.0
Footnotes.
1. MA = Monthly Average; WA = Weekly Average; DM = Daily Maximum.
2. Data are from Oct 2018 — Sep 2020 (pre-SOC).
3. Summer = April 1 — October 31; winter = November 1 — March 31.
4. Geometric mean.
5. Compliance level = 50 µg/L
6. Limits not in effect; delayed via compliance schedule.
4. Instream Data Summary
Instream monitoring may be required in certain situations, for example: 1) to verify model predictions when
model results for instream DO are within 1 mg/1 of instream standard at full permitted flow; 2) to verify
model predictions for outfall diffuser; 3) to provide data for future TMDL; 4) based on other instream
concerns. Instream monitoring may be conducted by the Permittee, and there are also Monitoring Coalitions
established in several basins that conduct instream sampling for the Permittee (in which case instream
monitoring is waived in the permit as long as coalition membership is maintained).
If applicable, summarize any instream data and what instream monitoring will be proposed for this permit
action: The current permit requires instream monitoring for six parameters (Color, Conductivity, Copper,
DO, Hardness and Temperature) in four locations (U, D1, D2, 133) in Long Creek, not all at the same
locations (see Table 3). Hardness is sampled upstream for calculation of dissolved to total metals for
hardness -dependent metals, including Copper, and is addressed in the Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
portion of Section 6 - Water Quality -Based Effluent Limits (WQBEL) below.
Table 3. Instream sampling locations and permit -required parameters.
Instream
Outfall
Location
Parameter(s)
identifier
U
001
> 100 ft upstream of discharge
Hardness, DO, Temperature,
Conductivity, Copper
DI
001
—2620 ft downstream
DO, Temperature, Conductivity,
Copper
D2
001A
4.9 mi. downstream at NCSR 1967
DO, Temperature, Conductivity,
(Sides Rd)
Copper
D3
001B
—200 ft downstream
Color
D1 was moved from its original location at the end of NCSR 1960 to its current location in a permit
modification in December 2012 due to safety concerns. Instream monitoring data were reviewed from
DMRs with concurrent effluent data for evaluation of potential stream impacts. Downstream data are
reported as different outfalls in the Division's BIMS database (Table 3). Upstream and downstream data
were tested for significance via ANOVA followed by t-tests if averages appeared to differ, with level of
Page 5 of 21

NCO024244
significance set at 0.05. If significant differences were found by ANOVA, t-tests was run to check for
differences between a downstream average and the upstream average. Effluent data in Table 2 were
compared against those instream. Reviewed data are summarized in Table 4 and elaborated in the following
paragraphs.
Table 4. Instream monitoring averages and ranges (in parentheses). *Statistically different from
Upstream.
Downstream
Parameter
Upstream
Standard'
D1 (001)
D2 (001A)
D3 (001B)
Dissolved Oxygen
Avg = 8.4
Avg = 7.7*
Avg = 8.3
Avg = 9.1 *
DA = 5.0
(DO), mg/L
(3.0-13.5)
(5.4-12.3)
(6.513.5)
(5.9-12.5)
Instant = 4.0
Temperature, °C
Avg = 20
Avg = 23*
Avg = 22*
Avg = 18*
DM = 32.0
(3-31)
(8-32)
(7-30)
(5-30)
Conductivity,
Avg = 208
Avg = 272*
Avg = 250
NA
µmhos/cm
(80-415)
(105--471)
(71-412)
Total Copper,
Avg = 2.8
Avg = 7.8*
Avg = 5.8*
NA
Acute = 20.12
µg/L 2
(2-10)
(3-21)
(2-19)
Chronic = 14.32
Total Hardness,
Avg = 73.3
NA
NA
NA
mg/L
(30-137)
Color, ADMI
Avg = 27.3
NA
NA
Avg = 24.0*
(11-79)
(12-65)
pH, SU
Avg =7.6
Avg =7.2*
Avg =7.5*
Avg =7.4*
6.0-9.0
(7 1-8.8)
(6.0-8.3)
(6.99.2)
(6.2-9.0)
Turbidity, NTU
Avg = 13.6
NA
NA
Avg = 25.3*
50
(2.2-60.0)
(5.9-80.0)
Footnotes
1. DA = Daily Average; DM = Daily Maximum.
2. Total Copper standards were calculated using average instream hardness of 73.3 mg/L for this hardness -dependent
dissolved metal and the EPA translator of 0.348 from dissolved to total. See attached Dissolved Metals Fact Sheet Memo
for details.
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) — Instream DO remains in the permit as a parameter of concern for aquatic life.
The receiving stream is meeting criteria in the 2022 Integrated Report. Reviewed instream DMR data from
October 2018 through September 2022 was shown to be above the DO standard of 5.0 mg/L consistently
downstream, but not upstream, which recorded below the standard twice in September 2019 and once in
August 2022. Instream averages tested different with statistical significance among all sites and upstream
tested different than and D1 and D3, but not D2. The effluent average DO is very similar to that upstream,
and so does not appear to be impacting the stream.
Temperature - Instream Temperature remains in the permit as a parameter of concern for aquatic life. The
receiving stream is meeting criteria in the 2022 Integrated Report. Temperatures in all sites were below the
standard of 32°C for lower piedmont and coastal plain waters. Significant differences were found among
all sites and between the upstream and each downstream site. There were four instances where the
downstream temperature at D1 exceeded the water quality standard of 2.8°C above the natural water
temperature when compared to upstream data, and one exceedance involving D3 (Table 5). Considering
Page 6 of 21

NCO024244
the sporadic nature of these downstream temperature increases and the insignificant findings of temperature
increase over the period examined, it does not appear that the effluent is impacting instream temperature.
Table 5. Temperature Increase (°C) Exceedances in Long Creek.
Sample Location
Date
1
Effluent
Upstream
Downstream
(D1)
Downstream
(D3)
Dl — U
Diff.
D3 — U
Diff.
8/7/2018
26
26
29
27
3
1
6/11/2019
23
21
24
--
1/23/2020
10
4
--
7/21/2021
1 23
26
1 29
11/28/2021
1 15
1 12
1 18
1 13
3
1
Conductivity — Instream Conductivity remains in the permit as a parameter of concern due to industrial
dischargers. The Permittee dropped their sole significant industrial user, Auria, from their pretreatment
program in July 2021, approved by the Division that month. The drop was in response to a change in Auria's
process by eliminating its dyeing operations, thereby no longer meeting criteria for Significant Industrial
User status. Statically significant differences were found among instream sites, and between the upstream
and each downstream site. The corresponding effluent data was higher on average, suggesting an impact
on the stream.
Color — Instream Color is in the permit as a parameter of concern due to the presence of industrial
dischargers. As stated above, the industrial discharger Auria had ceased dyeing operations, and the
Permittee had requested Color monitoring be removed from the permit in its renewal application.
Significant color difference was detected between the upstream and downstream sites, but with the
downstream site at a lower average value. The effluent average was lower than either instream average,
indicating no negative impact. Based on this pattern, color instream monitoring is removed from the permit.
Copper - Instream Copper remains in the permit as a parameter of concern due to the stream's current listing
for copper impairment on the Final 2022 303(d) list. Total Copper impairment is based on a Legacy
Category 5 Total Metals Assessment in 2008, exceeding the freshwater standard of 7 µg/L for aquatic life
at Assessment Unit 13-17-3lb, located —8.6 miles downstream of the outfall (Assessment Unit 13-17-31a,
wherein the outfall lies is not impaired). Since that time the state water quality standards for metals have
been updated, with those requiring calculation of dissolved to total metals for hardness -dependent metals,
which include copper. Using Permittee-submitted upstream Total Hardness data, the instream water quality
standards for Total Copper are calculated to be 14.32 µg/L chronic and 20.12 µg/L acute.
Review of instream copper data found both downstream averages to be statistically significantly higher
than the upstream average, with the overall average exceeding the chronic standard at D1, but not at D2.
Monthly data showed exceedances of both standards numerous times, more so at D 1 than at D2 (Table 6).
Effluent copper values averaged higher, indicating impact on this impaired stream segment. Instream
copper monitoring is maintained.
Page 7 of 21

NC0024244
Table 6. Number of exceedences of the Total Copper water quality standards in Long Creek, 2018-2022.
Location
Chronic (14.32 µg/L)
Acute (20.12 µg/L)
U
0
0
D1
7
2
D2
1
0
Fecal Coliform — Fecal Coliform instream monitoring was removed from the permit in 2000 without any
notes regarding its basis. The receiving stream is neither a Class B nor impaired for Fecal Coliform, meeting
the criteria for its removal per the Division's instream monitoring guidance document (DWQ 2002).
However, based on the number of effluent exceedences (see Section 5 — Compliance History) the Permittee
has reported, instream Fecal Coliform will be added to the permit.
Other parameters — Although not required, the Permittee monitored instream pH and Turbidity, two
parameters that have instream water quality standards. The receiving stream is meeting criteria for both
parameters in the 2022 Integrated Report. The submitted instream data were reviewed, finding significant
differences between the upstream and each downstream averages for each parameter, but not exceeding
their respective stream standards. Instream monitoring for pH and Turbidity is not required and will not be
added to the permit.
Instream monitoring frequencies in the current permit are weekly in summer months (June through
September) and monthly during the rest of the year, which are less frequent than those under NC 15A
NCAC 2B .0500 (3/week in summer, weekly in winter). These monitoring frequencies have been in the
permit dating back to 1992 and were likely set in a previous permit. A review of permit files dating as far
back as 1989 revealed no explanation for the monitoring frequencies, and consultation with regional office
personnel also yielded no explanation. Instream monitoring frequencies are maintained due to no substantial
impact from the effluent.
Is this facility a member of a Monitoring Coalition with waived instream monitoring (YIN): NO
Name of Monitoring Coalition: NA
5. Compliance Summary
Summarize the compliance record with permit effluent limits (past 5 years): From October 2017 through
September 2022 the facility had reported several exceedances in BOD, TSS, Ammonia and Fecal Coliform.
In response to the facility's chronic non-compliance, it entered an SOC in October 2020 with relaxed limits
for the above parameters. This SOC, expiring in December 2023, was replaced by an emended SOC in
October 2022, extending the limits and conditions until its expiration in August 2026 (see details in Section
1 above). Since October 1, 2020, the effective date of the SOC, the facility reported one Ammonia monthly
average exceedance in April 2021, and 38 TSS exceedances (12 monthly average and 26 weekly average).
All reported exceedances have resulted in enforcement cases.
The TSS exceedences are the result of the City's water treatment plant (WTP) discharging alum sludge to
the WWTP via its collection system. To address the necessary pretreatment requirements for this source
related to TSS limits, a special condition will be added to the permit requiring the City's pretreatment
Page 8 of 21

NC0024244
program be updated, and to bring the WTP into the program with an Industrial User Permit (IUP) containing
limits for TSS and other pertinent parameters to address passthrough and interference with the WWTP.
Summarize the compliance record with aquatic toxicity test limits and any second species test results (past
S years): The facility passed 19 of 20 quarterly chronic toxicity tests, with one failure followed by two
successive passing tests. as well as all 4 second species chronic toxicity tests. Second species tests were
sampled on 6/6/2021, 9/12/2021, 10/3/2021, and 12/5/2021.
Summarize the results from the most recent compliance inspection: The most recent facility inspection
(compliance evaluation), conducted on 8/16/2022, reported no issues and acknowledges the facility is
operating under an SOC.
6. Water Quality -Based Effluent Limitations (WQBELs)
Dilution and Mixing Zones
In accordance with 15A NCAC 213.0206, the following streamflows are used for dilution considerations
for development of WQBELs: 1Q10 streamflow (acute Aquatic Life); 7Q10 streamflow (chronic Aquatic
Life; non -carcinogen HH); 30Q2 streamflow (aesthetics); annual average flow (carcinogen, HH).
If applicable, describe any other dilution factors considered (e.g., based on CORMIX model results): NA
If applicable, describe any mixing zones established in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B. 0204(b): NA
Oxygen -Consuming Waste Limitations
Limitations for oxygen -consuming waste (e.g., BOD) are generally based on water quality modeling to
ensure protection of the instream dissolved oxygen (DO) water quality standard. Secondary TBEL limits
(e.g., BOD = 30 mg/L for Municipals) may be appropriate if deemed more stringent based on dilution and
model results.
Ifpermit limits are more stringent than TBELs, describe how limits were developed: Limitations for BOD
are based on a Streeter -Phelps model (Level B), conducted before the 1992 permit, for instream DO
protection. However, the facility is currently operating under relaxed SOC limits, which are still more
stringent than the TBELs. No changes are proposed.
Ammonia and Total Residual Chlorine Limitations
Limitations for ammonia are based on protection of aquatic life utilizing an ammonia chronic criterion of
1.0 mg/L (summer) and 1.8 mg/L (winter). Acute ammonia limits are derived from chronic criteria, utilizing
a multiplication factor of 3 for Municipals and a multiplication factor of 5 for Non -Municipals.
Limitations for Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) are based on the NC water quality standard for protection
of aquatic life (17 µg/L) and capped at 28 µg/L (acute impacts). Due to analytical issues, all TRC values
reported below 50 µg/L are considered compliant with their permit limit.
Describe any proposed changes to ammonia and/or TRC limits for this permit renewal: The current permit
limits are based on WLA to protect against ammonia toxicity, set in 2018:
Page 9 of 21

NC0024244
Season
12.0 MGD
16.0 MGD
Monthly Average
Weekly Average
Monthly Average
Weekly Average
Summer
1.1
3.3
1.1
3.3
Winter
2.6
7.8
2.4
7.2
The facility is operating under relaxed SOC year-round limits of 5.0 / 15.0 mg/L monthly/weekly average
until SOC expiration in 2026, when the permit limits become effective.
Similarly, the current TRC limit of 18 µg/L daily maximum was set based on the WLA and thus found to
be protective. No changes are proposed.
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) for Toxicants
If applicable, conduct RPA analysis and complete information below.
The need for toxicant limits is based upon a demonstration of reasonable potential to exceed water quality
standards, a statistical evaluation that is conducted during every permit renewal utilizing the most recent
effluent data for each outfall. The RPA is conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44 (d) (i). The NC
RPA procedure utilizes the following: 1) 95% Confidence Level/95% Probability; 2) assumption of zero
background; 3) use of %2 detection limit for "less than" values; and 4) streamflows used for dilution
consideration based on 15A NCAC 2B.0206. Effective April 6, 2016, NC began implementation of
dissolved metals criteria in the RPA process in accordance with guidance titled NPDES Implementation of
Instream Dissolved Metals Standards, dated June 10, 2016.
A reasonable potential analysis was conducted on effluent toxicant data collected between October 2018
through September 2022 for the 12.0 MGD and the 16.0 MGD expansion flows. Pollutants of concern
included toxicants with positive detections and associated water quality standards/criteria. Based on this
analysis, the following permitting actions are proposed for this permit:
• Effluent Limit with Monitoring. The following parameters will receive a water quality -based
effluent limit (WQBEL) since they demonstrated a reasonable potential to exceed applicable water
qualit standards/criteria:
Pollutant
12.0 MGD
16.0 MGD
Chronic
Acute
Chronic
Acute
Cadmium
1.09
6.36
1.06
6.21
Copper
15.6
21.6
15.1
21.0
Cyanide
5.4
23.6
5.3
23.2
Zinc
249
249
242
242
Monitoring Only. The following parameters will receive a monitor -only requirement since they
did not demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards/criteria, but
the maximum predicted concentration was > 50% of the allowable concentration: Chromium VI,
Total Lead and Total Silver at both flow tiers.
o Silver - quarterly monitoring is maintained due to one detection in September 2022 at 2
µg/L, following Division guidance for implementing instream dissolved metals standards
(DWR 2016).
No Limit or Monitoring: The following parameters will not receive a limit or monitoring, since
they did not demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards/criteria
and the maximum predicted concentration was < 50% of the allowable concentration: Arsenic,
Page 10 of 21

NC0024244
Beryllium, Total Chromium, Total Phenolic Compounds, Nickel, Selenium, Molybdenum and
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate at both flow tiers.
o Total Chromium — maximum reported value is less than the allowable Cw for Chromium
VI at both flow tiers.
o Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate — all data of past three years (since September 2019) were
nondetects at < 2 µg/L, > allowable Cw for each flow tier and < PQL of 10 µg/L (allowable
Cw = 1.6 ug/L at 12 MGD and 1.3 ug/L at 16 MGD).
POTW Effluent Pollutant Scan Review: Three effluent pollutant scans were evaluated for
additional pollutants of concern. Samples for the pollutant scans were collected on 10/15/2019,
9/15/2020, and 6/2/2021. No additional pollutants were detected.
o The following parameter(s) will receive a water quality -based effluent limit (WQBEL)
with monitoring, since as part of a limited data set, two samples exceeded the allowable
discharge concentration: None.
o The following parameter(s) will receive a monitor -only requirement, since as part of a
limited data set, one sample exceeded the allowable discharge concentration: None.
If applicable, attach a spreadsheet of the RPA results as well as a copy of the Dissolved Metals
Implementation Fact Sheet for freshwater/saltwater to this Fact Sheet. Include a printout of the RPA
Dissolved to Total Metal Calculator sheet if this is a Municipality with a Pretreatment Program.
Toxicity Testing Limitations
Permit limits and monitoring requirements for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) have been established in
accordance with Division guidance (per WET Memo, 8/2/1999). Per WET guidance, all NPDES permits
issued to Major facilities or any facility discharging "complex" wastewater (contains anything other than
domestic waste) will contain appropriate WET limits and monitoring requirements, with several exceptions.
The State has received prior EPA approval to use an Alternative WET Test Procedure in NPDES permits,
using single concentration screening tests, with multiple dilution follow-up upon a test failure.
Describe proposed toxicity test requirement: This is a Major POTW, and a chronic WET limit at 90%
effluent will continue on a quarterly frequency at both flow tiers.
Mercury Statewide TMDL Evaluation
There is a statewide TMDL for mercury approved by EPA in 2012. The TMDL target was to comply with
EPA's mercury fish tissue criteria (0.3 mg/kg) for human health protection. The TMDL established a
wasteload allocation for point sources of 37 kg/year (81 lb/year), and is applicable to municipals and
industrial facilities with known mercury discharges. Given the small contribution of mercury from point
sources (-2% of total load), the TMDL emphasizes mercury minimization plans (MMPs) for point source
control. Municipal facilities > 2 MGD and discharging quantifiable levels of mercury (> I ng/L) will receive
an MMP requirement. Industrials are evaluated on a case -by -case basis, depending if mercury is a pollutant
of concern. Effluent limits may also be added if annual average effluent concentrations exceed the WQBEL
value (based on the NC WQS of 12 ng/L) and/or if any individual value exceeds a TBEL value of 47 ng/L.
Describe proposed permit actions based on mercury evaluation: The current permit has a MMP
requirement but no MMP summary was submitted with the application. It was received upon request on
1/10/2023, consisting of a series of data tables of the effluent, collection system and industrial sources, as
well as a summary of a dental office amalgam survey.
Since the 2022 annual average was greater than the WQBEL at each flow tier but no single value was higher
than the TBEL, an annual average WQBEL will be added to the permit for both flow tiers, with quarterly
monitoring using EPA Method 1631 E (low level). Despite the facility being < 2 MGD, the MMP special
condition will be maintained.
Page 11 of 21

NC0024244
Table 7. Mercury Effluent Data Summary
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
# of Samples
6
6
4
4
3
Annual Average Cone. ng/L
8.7
5.5
9.4
6.3
14.8
Maximum Cone., ng/L
23.80
18.30
13.80
13.10
28.40
TBEL, ng/L
47
WQBEL, ng/L at 12 MGD
13.03
WQBEL, ng/L at 16 MGD
12.77
Other TMDL/Nutrient Management Strategy Considerations
If applicable, describe any other TMDLs/Nutrient Management Strategies and their implementation within
this permit: The facility is not subject to any TMDL or Nutrient Management Strategy, but to better
understand effluent Total Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) and Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen (NO3-N +
NO2) reporting will be added to the permit at both flow tiers.
Other WQBEL Considerations- Permit Limit Development
The current total chromium limitations were maintained in the interim effluent sheet until hexavalent
chromium levels can be assessed. The reasonable potential analysis using the city's total chromium effluent
data showed reasonable potential to violate the new hexavalent chromium standard. As a result, hexavalent
chromium limitations were added to this permit. Sampling for hexavalent chromium will ascertain if
hexavalent chromium is present in the total chromium samples and thus the effluent.
If applicable, describe any other parameters of concern evaluated for WQBELs: The current permit has
monitoring requirement for Color, based on a textile industrial user conducting a dyeing operation. The
Permittee requested removal of Color from the permit or have it be subject to a permit reopener clause,
citing the industrial user had ceased its dyeing operation. Effluent color data were reviewed and found that
the average was lower than instream averages (Tables 2 and 4). The effluent does not appear to affect the
instream color and therefore monitoring requirements will be removed from the permit. In the event that
dyeing operations resume or are initiated from the existing or new textile industrial users, the permit
reopener special condition, currently in the permit, will be maintained.
The emerging contaminants PFAS and 1,4-Dioxane were sampled from of the municipal landfill leachate
by the City upon request for a Chemical Addendum on 11/18/2022. Results showed elevated concentrations
of several parameters (Table 8). Average flow of landfill leachate to the WWTP from the past three years
is 31,591 gal/day (0.0316 MGD). The nearest downstream water supply (WS-IV) boundary, for the Blewett
Falls Lake water supply watershed, lies 40 miles from the WWTP's outfall.
Page 12 of 21

NC0024244
Table 8. Emerging Contaminants from the City of Albermarle Landfill leachate, sampled November 18,
2022 with PFAS parameters at concentrations > 100 ng/L.
Parameter
Result
1,4-Dioxane, µg/L
35.3
Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), ng/L
1060
Perfluorooctanosulfonic Acid (PFOS), ng/L
667
2-(N-Methylperfluorooctanesulfonamido) acetic acid (N-McFOSAA),
ng.L
280
Perfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA), ng/L
410
Perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA), ng/L
851
Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA), ng/L
1280
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
209
Perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), ng.L
588
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), ng/L
185
6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonate (6:2 FTS), ng/L
103
2H,211,314,311-Perfluorooctanoic Acid (5:3 FTCA), ng/L
3040
In addition, the City submitted several Safety Data Sheets and Technical Bulletins from the two textile
industrial users (IUs). Their review revealed most products to be of proprietary nature with limited chemical
information provided. PFAS release by the two textile IUs could not be determined from this review.
Based on the presence of PFAS and 1,4-Dioxane in the landfill leachate, the potential of PFAS in the
wastestreams from the two textile IUs AURIA and Creative Dyeing, and the positioning of the outfall
upstream of a water supply watershed, quarterly monitoring for PFAS and 1,4-Dioxane will be added to the
permit. In addition, a special condition to reopen the permit for changes in 1,4-Dioxane requirements will
be added to the permit.
To address pretreatment issues related to landfill leachate, the proposed Pretreatment Update special
condition (see Section 5 — Compliance Summary) will require the City's landfill be included in the
pretreatment program with an Industrial User Permit with appropriate conditions and requirements.
The US EPA issued NPDES permitting guidance addressing PFAS in a memo dated 12/5/2022.
Recommendations in the guidance memo applicable to the Albermarle — Long Creek WWTP permit involve
monitoring, pretreatment, biosolids, and public notice. Monitoring of effluent, influent and biosolids is
recommended at frequencies of at least quarterly, using the EPA Draft Method 1633 with results submitted
via DMRs. Until the final method is approved, as it may involve changes to the parameter list, the proposed
quarterly PFAS sampling requirement will include a compliance schedule which delays the effective date
of this requirement until the first full calendar quarter beginning 6 months after EPA has a final wastewater
method in 40 CFR 136 published in the Federal Register. This date may be extended upon request and if
there are no NC -certified labs.
If applicable, describe any compliance schedules proposed for this permit renewal in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2K0107(c)(2)(B), 40CFR 122.47, and EPA May 2007Memo: The current permit contains a seven
(7) year compliance schedule for Cadmium, Chromium VI, and Copper, with the compliance date of
Page 13 of 21

NC0024244
9/l/2025. Based on the RPA results, Chromium VI limits will be removed and monitoring reduced to
quarterly; Chromium VI will be removed from the compliance schedule. A compliance schedule was
offered for the proposed Cyanide limits, but the ORC declined.
If applicable, describe any water quality standards variances proposed in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.3(e) and 15A NCAC 2B.0226 for this permit renewal: NA
7. Technology -Based Effluent Limitations (TBELs)
Municipals (if not applicable, delete and skip to Industrials)
Are concentration limits in the permit at least as stringent as secondary treatment requirements (30 mg1L
BOD51TSS for Monthly Average, and 45 mg/L for BOD51TSS for Weekly Average). YES
If NO, provide a justification for alternative limitations (e.g., waste stabilization pond). NA
Are 85% removal requirements for BOD51TSS included in the permit? YES.
If NO, provide a justification (e.g., waste stabilization pond). NA
8. Antidegradation Review (New/Expanding Discharge):
The objective of an antidegradation review is to ensure that a new or increased pollutant loading will not
degrade water quality. Permitting actions for new or expanding discharges require an antidegradation
review in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0201. Each applicant for a new/expanding NPDES permit must
document an effort to consider non -discharge alternatives per 15A NCAC 2H.0105(c)(2). In all cases,
existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing use is maintained
and protected.
If applicable, describe the results of the antidegradation review, including the Engineering Alternatives
Analysis (EAA) and any water quality modeling results: NA
9. Antibacksliding Review:
Sections 402(o)(2) and 303(d)(4) of the CWA and federal regulations at 40 CFR 122.44(1) prohibit
backsliding of effluent limitations in NPDES permits. These provisions require effluent limitations in a
reissued permit to be as stringent as those in the previous permit, with some exceptions where limitations
may be relaxed (e.g., based on new information, increases in production may warrant less stringent TBEL
limits, or WQBELs may be less stringent based on updated RPA or dilution).
Are any effluent limitations less stringent than previous permit (YES/NO): YES
If YES, confirm that antibacksliding provisions are not violated: The facility is currently operating under
an SOC with temporarily -reduced limits for BOD, TSS, Ammonia and Fecal Coliform. Removal of
Chromium VI limits is based on evaluation of recent effluent data plus Hardness data.
Page 14 of 21

NCO024244
10. Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring frequencies for NPDES permitting are established in accordance with the following regulations
and guidance: 1) State Regulation for Surface Water Monitoring, 15A NCAC 213.0500; 2) NPDES
Guidance, Monitoring Frequency for Toxic Substances (7/15/2010 Memo); 3) NPDES Guidance, Reduced
Monitoring Frequencies for Facilities with Superior Compliance (10/22/2012 Memo); 4) Best Professional
Judgement (BPJ). Per US EPA (Interim Guidance, 1996), monitoring requirements are not considered
effluent limitations under Section 402(o) of the Clean Water Act, and therefore anti -backsliding
prohibitions would not be triggered by reductions in monitoring frequencies.
No effluent parameters are sampled at reduced monitoring frequencies.
For instream monitoring, refer to Section 4
11. Electronic Reporting Requirements
The US EPA NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was finalized on December 21, 2015. Effective December
21, 2016, NPDES regulated facilities are required to submit Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
electronically. Effective December 21, 2020, NPDES regulated facilities will be required to submit
additional NPDES reports electronically. This permit contains the requirements for electronic reporting,
consistent with Federal requirements.
12. Summary of Proposed Permitting Actions:
Current permit conditions and proposed changes are presented in the following tables for 12.0 and 16.0
MGD flow tiers, respectively.
Table 8. Current Permit Conditions and Proposed Changes at 12.0 MGD.
Parameter
Current Permit'
Proposed Change
Basis for Condition/Change
Flow
MA = 12.0 MGD
Monitor continuously
No change
15A NCAC 213.0505
Summer:
MA = 10.0 mg/L
WQBEL. Based on 1993 WLA
WA = 15.0 mg/L
model and protection of DO
BODS
Winter:
No change
standard. 15A NCAC 2B .0200,
MA — 20 mg/L
0500.
WA = 30 mg/L
Monthly daily
MA = 30 mg/L
TBEL. Secondary treatment
TSS
WA = 45 mg/L
No change
standards / 40 CFR 133 / 15A
Monitor daily
NCAC 2B .0406, .0500.
Page 15 of 21

NC0024244
Parameter
Current Permit'
Proposed Change
Basis for Condition/Change
Summer:
MA = 1.1 mg/L
WA = 3.3 mg/L
WQBEL. WLA results, for
N-13-N
Winter:
No change
protection from toxicity. 15A NCAC
MA = 2.6 mg/L
2B .0500.
WA = 7.8 mg/L
Monitor daily
DA > 5.0 mg/L
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 213.0200.
DO
No change
Based on 1993 WLA and for the
Monitor daily
protection of water quality. 15A
NCAC 213.0500.
MA = 200 /100 mL
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 213.0200,
Fecal Coliform
WA = 400 /100 mL
No change
0500.
Monitor daily
TRC
DM = 18 µg/L.
No change
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 2B .0200,
Monitor daily
.0500; WLA results
Temperature
Monitor daily
No change
15A NCAC 2B .0500
Total Kjeldahl
No requirement
Add monthly
For calculating Total Nitrogen
Nitrogen (TKN)
monitoring
Nitrate -Nitrite
Nitrogen (NO3-N
No requirement
Add monthly
F8r calculating Total Nitrogen
+ NOz-N)
monitoring
Total Nitrogen
Monitor monthly
No change
15A NCAC 2B .0500
Total Phosphorus
Monitor monthly
No change
15A NCAC 2B .0500
Conductivity
Monitor daily
No change
15A NCAC 213.0500
Monitor effluent and
Revised WQS and EPA's guidelines
Total Hardness
instream (upstream)
No change
on hardness -dependent metals.
quarterly
Interim Limits
No change in interim
MA — 2.2 µg/L
limits or monitoring
DM = 16.0 µg/L
frequency
Final Limits
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 213.0200.
MA = 1.12 µg/L
Final Limits
Reasonable potential (RP) to exceed
Total Cadmium
DM = 6.62 µg/L
MA = 1.1 µg/L
WQS using updated Hardness data.
Montor monthly
DM = 6.4 µg/L
Delayed implementation of final
No change to
limits via compliance schedule.
Seven-year compliance
compliance schedule,
schedule, expires
expires Aug 31, 2025
August 31, 2025.
No RP found using updated
Total Chromium
Monitor monthly
Remove from permit
Hardness data; maximum result >
Allowable Cw for Chromium VI.
Page 16 of 21

NC0024244
Parameter
Current Permit'
Proposed Change 1
Basis for Condition/Change
MA = 11.7 µg/L
DM = 16.9 µg/L
Remove limits and
Monitor monthly
compliance schedule,
No RP found using updated
Chromium -VI
due to Hardness data.
Hardness data; maximum result >
Seven-year compliance
50% Allowable Cw.
schedule, expires
Monitor quarterly
August 31, 2025.
MA = 16.09 µg/L
MA = 15.6 µg/L
DM = 22.52 µg/L
DM = 21.6 µg/L
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 213.0200. RP
Monitor monthly
found, using updated Hardness data.
Total Copper
No change in
Seven-year compliance
monitoring frequency
Delayed implementation of limits
schedule, expires
or compliance schedule,
via compliance schedule.
August 31, 2025.
expires Aug 31, 2025.
MA = 5.4 µg/L
Total Cyanide
No requirement
DM = 23.6 µg/L
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 213.0200. RP
found.
Monitor monthly
No RP found using updated
Total Lead
No requirement
Monitor quarterly
Hardness data; maximum result >
50% Allowable Cw.
One detection found within past
Total Silver
Monitor quarterly
No change
three years (DWR Dissolved Metals
Guidance, 2016).
Mercury Minimization
Maintain MMP
WQBEL - statewide mercury
Total Mercury
Plan (MMP)
AA = 13.0 ng/L
TMDL, based on plant size; annual
Monitor quarterly
average data exceeded WQBEL.
All data of past 3 yrs (since 9/2019)
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)
Monitor quarterly
Remove from permit
were nondetects at < 2 µg/L, > Cw
phthalatelima
for each flow tier and < PQL of 10
µg/L.
Add quarterly
1,4-Dioxane
No requirement
monitoring; add
reopener special
More data are needed to evaluate.
condition
Add quarterly
PFAS
No requirement
monitoring special
More data are needed to evaluate.
condition
Textile industrial user ceased dyeing
Color (ADMI)
Monitor Instream and
Remove from permit
operations; effluent and instream
at the Effluent, 2/month
data show no effects on instream
color.
Page 17 of 21

NC0024244
Parameter
Current Permit 1
Proposed Change
Basis for Condition/Change
Chronic Toxicity
Chronic limit, 90%
WQBEL. No toxics in toxic
Test
effluent
No change
amounts. 15A NCAC 2B .0200,
Monitor quarterly
.0500
pH
Between 6 and 9 SU
No change
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 2B .0200,
Monitor daily
.0500
Effluent Pollutant
Three times per permit
Update sample years:
40 CFR 122
Scan
cycle
2024, 2025, 2026.
Color Reopener
Special condition
No change
NCGS.143-215.66, NCGS 143-
215.1 (b)
Pretreatment
TSS exceedences caused by WTP
Update
No requirement
Special Condition
effluent and contaminants reported
in landfill leachate.
Electronic
Special condition
Update special
In accordance with EPA Electronic
Reporting
condition
Reporting Rule 2015.
Footnote.
1. MGD = million gallons per day, MA = monthly average, WA = weekly average, DM = daily maximum, DA = daily
average, AA = annual average.
Table 9. Current Permit Conditions and Proposed Changes at 16.0 MGD.
Parameter
Current Permit'
Proposed Change'
Basis for Condition/Change
Flow
MA = 16.0 MGD
Monitor continuously
No change
15A NCAC 213.0505
Summer:
MA = 10.0 mg/L
WQBEL. Based on 1993 WLA
WA = 15.0 mg/L
model and protection of DO
BODS
Winter:
No change
standard. 15A NCAC 2B .0200,
MA — 20.0 mg/L
O500
WA = 30.0 mg/L
Monitor daily
MA = 30.0 mg/L
TBEL. Secondary treatment
TSS
WA = 45.0 mg/L
No change
standards / 40 CFR 133 / 15A
Monitor daily
NCAC 2B .0406, .0500.
Summer:
MA = 1.1 mg/L
WA = 3.3 mg/L
WQBEL. WLA results, for
NH3-N
Winter:
No change
protection from toxicity. 15A
MA = 2.4 mg/L
NCAC 213.0500.
WA = 7.2 mg/L
Monitor daily
DA > 5.0 mg/L
WQBEL. Based on 1993 WLA and
DO
Monitor daily
No change
for the protection of water quality;
15A NCAC 213.0500.
Page 18 of 21

NC0024244
Parameter
Current Permit 1
Proposed Change 1
Basis for Condition/Change
MA = 200 /100 mL
WQBEL. WQ standard, 15A NCAC
Fecal Coliform
WA = 400 /100 mL
No change
2B .0200, .0500.
Monitor daily
TRC
DM 18.0 µg/L
No change
WQBEL. WLA results; 15A NCAC
Monitor daily
2B .0200, .0500.
Temperature
Monitor daily
No change
15A NCAC 2B .0500
Total Kjeldahl
No requirement
Add monthly
For calculating Total Nitrogen
Nitrogen (TKN)
monitoring
Nitrate -Nitrite
Add monthly
Nitrogen (NO3-N
No requirement
monitoring
For calculating Total Nitrogen
+ NOz-N)
Total Nitrogen
Monitor monthly
No change
15A NCAC 2B .0500
Total Phosphorus
Monitor monthly
No change
15A NCAC 2B .0500
Conductivity
Monitor daily
No change
15A NCAC 2B .0500
Monitor effluent and
Revised WQS and EPA's guidelines
Total Hardness
instream (upstream)
No change
on hardness -dependent metals.
quarterly
MA = 1.12 µg/L
MA = 1.1 µg/L
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 2B .0200.
Total Cadmium
DM = 6.62 µg/L
DM = 6.2 µg/L
Reasonable potential to exceed
Monitor monthly
Monitor monthly
WQS.
No RP found using updated
Total Chromium
Monitor monthly
Monitor quarterly
Hardness data; maximum result >
Allowable Cw for Chromium VI.
MA = 11.7 µg/L
Remove limits
No RP found using updated
Chromium -VI
DM = 16.9 µg/L
Monitor quarterly
Hardness data; maximum result >
Monitor monthly
50% Allowable Cw.
MA = 15.78 µg/L
MA = 15.1 µg/L
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 213.0200. RP
Total Copper
DM = 22.15 µg/L
DM = 21.0 µg/L
found, using updated Hardness data.
Monitor monthly
Monitor monthly
MA = 5.3 µg/L
Total Cyanide
No requirement
DM = 23.2 µg/L
WQBEL. 15A NCAC 2B .0200. RP
found.
Monitor monthly
No RP found using updated
Total Lead
No requirement
Monitor quarterly
Hardness data; maximum result >
50% Allowable Cw.
One detection found within past
Total Silver
Monitor quarterly
No change
three years (DWR Dissolved Metals
Guidance, 2016).
Page 19 of 21

NCO024244
Parameter
Current Permit'
Proposed Change
Basis for Condition/Change
Mercury Minimization
Maintain MMP
WQBEL - statewide mercury
Total Mercury
Plan (MMP)
AA = 12.8 ng/L
TMDL, based on plant size; annual
Monitor quarterly
average data exceeded WQBEL.
All data of past 3 yrs (since 9/2019)
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)
Monitor quarterly
Remove from permit
Were nondetects at < 2 µg/L, > Cw
phthalate
for each flow tier and < PQL of 10
µg/L.
Add quarterly
1,4-Dioxane
No requirement
monitoring; add
reopener special
data are needed to evaluate.
condition
Add quarterly
PFAS
No requirement
monitoring / special
More data are needed to evaluate.
condition
Textile industrial user ceased dyeing
Color (ADMI)
Monitor Instream and
Remove from permit
operations; effluent and instream
at the Effluent, 2/month
data show no effects on instream
color.
Chronic Toxicity
Chronic limit, 90%
WQBEL. No toxics in toxic
Test
effluent
No change
amounts. 15A NCAC 2B .0200,
Monitor quarterly
.0500.
pH
Between 6 and 9 SU
No change
WQBEL. WQ standard, 15A NCAC
Monitor daily
2B .0200, .0500.
Effluent Pollutant
Three times per permit
Revise as first three
Scan
cycle
years after effective
40 CFR 122
date of expanded flow
Color Reopener
Special condition
No change
NCGS.143-215.66, NCGS 143-
215.1 (b)
Pretreatment
TSS exceedences caused by WTP
Update
No requirement
Special Condition
effluent and contaminants reported
in landfill leachate.
Electronic
Special condition
Update special
In accordance with EPA Electronic
Reporting
condition
Reporting Rule 2015.
Footnote.
1. MGD = million gallons per day, MA = monthly average, WA = weekly average, DM = daily maximum,
DA = daily average, AA = annual average.
13. Public Notice Schedule:
Permit to Public Notice: xx/xx/2023
Per 15A NCAC 21-1.0109 & .0111, The Division will receive comments for a period of 30 days following
the publication date of the public notice. Any request for a public hearing shall be submitted to the Director
Page 20 of 21

NC0024244
within the 30 days comment period indicating the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons
why a hearing is warranted.
14. Fact Sheet Addendum (if applicable):
Were there any changes made since the Draft Permit was public noticed (Yes/No): YES
If Yes, list changes and their basis below:
15. Fact Sheet Attachments (if applicable):
• Effluent Pollutant Scan reports
• 2"d species WET test reports
• Process Narrative with system diagrams
• EMC SOC WQ S 19-007
• EMC SOC WQ S 19-007 Ad I
• Final 2022 NC 303(d) List, page 186
• Final 2022 Integrated Report, pages 1310-1311
• WET Testing Summary, page 1
• Compliance Evaluation Inspection report, 8/31 /2022
• Waste load allocations for TRC and NH3-N - 12 and 16 MGD
• RPA Spreadsheet Summaries and dissolved to total metal calculator - 12 and 16 MGD
• Dissolved Metals Implementation/Freshwater
• Mercury WQBEL/TBEL evaluation - 12 and 16 MGD
• Mercury Minimization Plan summary
• Chemical Addendum including supplemental information
Page 21 of 21

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. _
Outfall DO/
Facility Name: Long Creek WWTP 4-No ORC: Brandon W. Plyler
Date of sampling: 10- 15-20 19 Phone: [phone]
Analytical Laboratory: Environment 1 L- O/
-r
Parameter
Sample
TypeVA6-5
Analytica
d
Ammonia (as N)
Composite0.1
Dissolved oxygen
Grab
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite3.2
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite1.2
Total Phosphorus
Composite5.4
Total dissolved solids
Composite997Hardness
Composite997Chlorine
(total residual, TRC)
Grab
Oil and grease
Grab
EPA 1664B
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Antimony
Composite
EPA 200.7
Arsenic
Composite I
EPA 200.7
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Dpper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
-hlorobromomethane
,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
Trans- 1, 2-dichloroethylene
Month�'�`��
YearC'/y
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
0.1
0.5
0.1
6.2
mg/1
mg/1
1
1
1.0
12.9
mg/1
1
0.5
2.9
mg/l
1
0.1
0.8
mg/1
1
50.0
219.0
rng/l
1
2.5
41.0
rng/l
1
15.0
<15
µg/L
1
5.0
10.0
<5
52
mg/1
µg/L
1
1
10.0 I
<3 I
µg/ L �-
1
Composite
L EPA 200.7
1.0
<1
µg/L
1
Composite
LEEPA 200.7
1.0
<0.5
jig/ L
1
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<2
µg/L
1
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
9
µg/L
1
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<2
µg/L
1
Composite
EPA 7470A
0.2
<0.2
µg/L
1
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<5
µg/L
1
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<3
µg/L
1
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<1
µg/L
1
Composite
EPA 200.8
1.0
<1
µg/L
1
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
32
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 9014
0.01
<0.005
mg/I
1
Grab
EPA 420.1
0.05
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
10.0
<100
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
5.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/l,
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1.

Permit No.
Outfall &0
Y2 ,vx Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
,,Parameter
volatile organic compo
Moroethyleneoropropaneropropyleneeneomideloride chloride
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dichlorophenol
4-dimethylphenol
E
6diitro-o-cresolitrophenolhenolhenollorophenolichlorophenolutral compoundsthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
oBenzo(ghi)perylene
e
anthracene
pyrene
ofluoranthene
luoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
-is (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
iromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
Month
Year
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Sample
Units of
r
Number of
Level
Result
Measurement
samples
(Cont.)
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/ L
1
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
Grab
EPA 624
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<20
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
i v.v
__lUU
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
5.0
<20
µg/L
1
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
10.0
10.0
<10
<10
µg/L
µg/L
1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 2

e� Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. ,�r�t%�. Y� �`/
Outfall
Month
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
Or
µg/L 1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of Number of
Measurement samples
Base -neutral compounds (cant.)
Chrysene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µd
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
1V.0
10.0
<lU
<10
µg/L
µg/L
1
1
214-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
tE
µg/L
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Fluorene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
exachloroethane
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Isophorone
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Naphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
I EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Authorized Representative game
Signature
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3

nnual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No.
Outfall
Month
Year lr�
Facility Name: Long Creek WWTP
Date of sampling 9/ 15/2020
Analytical Laboratory: Environment 1
ORC: Brandon W. Plyler
Phone: [phone]
Parameter `:
Sample
�`ype .
Analytical;
Method =
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result.
Unitsof
Measurement
Number of,
samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
EPA 350.1
0.1
0.1
mg/1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Grab
300
0.5
7.7
mg/1
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
EPA 353.2
1.0
17.5
mg/1
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
EPA 351.2
0.5
2.0
mg/l
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
EPA 365.4
0.1
1.4
mg/l
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
SM254OC-1997
50.0
211.0
mg/1
1
Hardness
Composite
SM234OB-1997
2.5
51.0
mg/1
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
50060
15.0
<15
µg/L
1
Oil and grease
Grab
EPA 1664B
5.0
<5
mg/l
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide
and total
phenols
Antimony
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
28
µg/L
1
Arsenic
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<2
µg/L
1
Beryllium
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
<1
µg/L
1
Cadmium
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
<0.5
IAg/L
1
Chromium
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
5
µg/L
1
Copper
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
30
µg/L
1
Lead
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<2
µg/L
1
Mercury
Composite
EPA 7470A
0.2
5.6
µg/L
1
Nickel
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
4
µg/L
1
Selenium
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<3
µg/L
1
Silver
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<1
µg/L
1
Thallium
Composite
EPA 200.8
1.0
<1
µg/L
1
Zinc
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
156
µg/L
1
Cyanide
Grab
EPA 9014
0.01
<10
mg/l
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
EPA 420.1
0.05
<5
µg/L
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
EPA 624
10.0
< 100
µg/ L
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
EPA 624
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
Benzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Bromoform
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Chloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
< 10
µg/ L
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
EPA 624
5.0
<5
µg/L
1
Chloroform
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
In/
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1, 1 -dichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
IAg/L
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 1

Permit No. Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
✓��'
Outfall
Month
Year
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1, 1 -dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Toluene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<20
µg/L
1
2-chlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
].
2,4-dimethylphenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/ L
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
Phenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
Acenaphthylene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/ L
1
Anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Benzidine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<100
µg/L
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
<20
µg/L
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 2

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. 7A1-�2 �,
Outfall bO 0
Month
Year
a?
x fli-8
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical '
Method !
Quantitation;
Level
Sample
Result'
Units `off
Measurement,:
Number of
samples
Base -neutral compounds (cant) .
Chrysene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Fluorene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Isophorone
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Naphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Authorized Representative name
Signature
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3

/� � ,,_ ,. nnual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
� Permit No. 1 Month
Outfall Year
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1, 1 -dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
IAg/ L
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
IAg/L
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Toluene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<20
µg/L
1
2-chlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
ug/L
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2,4-dimethylphenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
ug/L
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
ug/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
Phenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Base -neutral compounds,
Acenaphthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
ug/L
1
Anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Benzidine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<100
µg/L
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
<20
µg/L
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 2

��7� Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. 7 Month 66
Outfall L Year :a? D
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Parameter
Sample
Type "
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample':
Result.
Units of'.; .
Measurement`
° Number of
samples
Sase=neutral compounds'(cont )
Chrysene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Fluorene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Isophorone
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Naphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
Pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<10
µg/L
1
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Author'presenVti name
Signature
7'
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No.�
Outfall
Month
Year 9=0-)1
Facility Name: Long Creek WWTP
Date of sampling 6/2/2021
Analytical Laboratory: Environment 1
ORC: Brandon W. Plyler
Phone: [phone]
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
EPA 350.1
0.1
0.1
mg/l
1
Dissolved oxygen
Grab
300
0.5
7.7
mg/l
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
EPA 353.2
1.0
5.9
mg/1
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
EPA 351.2
0.5
2.0
mg/1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
EPA 365.4
0.1
1.5
mg/1
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
SM254OC-1997
50.0
260.0
mg/1
1
Hardness
Composite
SM2340B-1997
2.5
75.0
mg/1
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
50060
15.0
16.0
µg/L
1
Oil and grease
Grab
EPA 1664B
5.0
<5
mg/1
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide
and total
phenols
Antimony
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
45
µg/L
1
Arsenic
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<2
µg/L
1
Beryllium
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
<1
µg/L
1
Cadmium
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
<0.5
µg/L
1
Chromium
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<2.0
µg/L
1
Copper
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
38
µg/L
1
Lead
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<2
µg/L
1
Mercury
Composite
EPA 7470A
0.2
12.9
µg/L
1
Nickel
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
6
µg/L
1
Selenium
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<3
µg/L
1
Silver
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<1
µg/L
1
Thallium
Composite
EPA 200.8
1.0
<1
µg/L
1
Zinc
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
182
µg/L
1
Cyanide
Grab
EPA 9014
0.01
<5.0
mg/1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
EPA 420.1
0.05
<20
µg/L
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
EPA 624
10.0
<100
µg/L
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
EPA 624
10.0
<50
µg/L
1
Benzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Bromoform
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Chloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<10
µg/L
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
EPA 624
5.0
<5
µg/L
1
Chloroform
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1,1-dichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<5
µg/L
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 1

• PO Box 7565
oCTIC Asheville, NC 28802
8802
c
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Envleanmental Testing Solutions, Inc
cssi. ..+ r....:e;+., Rnnnr+ Pnrm - rhrnnir Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test Date: September 26, 2021
Facility: Environment 1, Inc. NPDES #: NC 0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
City of Albemarle, Long Creek WWTP
.aboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc., Certificate # 037
signature of Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC):
SRC Phone / E-mail:
signature of Laboratory Supervisor At-�
e-Mail to: ATForms.ATB(dDncdenr.gov
Or Mail Original to: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water Sciences Section / Aquatic Toxicology Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test StartDate: September 14, 2021
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
45
% Effluent
67.5 %
Effluent
90%
% Effluent
95%
% Effluent
300%
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
High Concent
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
Comments
Project #: 16262
Sample #: 210914.04, 210916.06, 210918.0
Test Organisms: Pimephales promelas
Supplier
P.g,n
-house Culture
ch: 09-13-21 1500
End hatch: 09-14-21 0505
Replicate number
7 1 4
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.667
0.662
0.737
0.818
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.940
0.887
0.851
0.872
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.733
0.618
0.734
0.817
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.768
0.738
0.723
0.691
Surviving number of larvae
9
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.721
0.776
0.676
0.600
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.731
0.688
0,733
0.687
Survival (%)
100.0
Average wt (mg)
0.721
Average wt /
0.721
surviving (mg)
Survival (%)
100.0
Average wt (mg)
0.888
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.726
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.730
Survival (%) 97.5
Average wt (mg) 0.695
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.710
7.82
7.74
7.88
7.70
7.90
7.71
7.80
7.78
7.87
7.65
7.87
7.73
7.81
7.74
7.7
7.1
7.8
7.6
7.8
T5
7.7
7.6
7.6
7.4
7.7
7.4
7.8
7.2
24.7
24.6
24.8
24.4
24.8
24.6
24.9
24.6
24.7
24.4
24.8
24.3
24.7
24.4
ration
6.27 6.52 6.53 6.49 6.26 6.31 6.31 6.50 5.92 6.27 6.30 6.44 6.41 6.44
8.3 8.0 7.8 7.6 8.1 7.4 7.7 7.3 8.3 1 7.5 8.1 7.4 7.6 7.3
25.0 24.5 25.0 24.6 25.0 24.4 25.0 24.5 24.9 1 24.2 7.5.0 24.3 24.9 24.5
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO,):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (.C):
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Control
09-12-21 09-14-21 09-16-21 }4;:%
24-h 24.25-h 24-h (`
7.1 3.1 3.1 60, 59, 61
50 56 52 92, 94, 92
365 360 415 a
0.10o.8 1.9 0.7
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV:
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEL:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Survival Growth
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
100% 100%
>100% >100%
>100% >100%
Visual Insp. I Dunnett's
Survival Growth
%Effluent Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
45% 2.410 -3.997
67.5% 2.410 -0.108
90% 2.410 -0.216
g5% 2.410 0.630
100% 2.410 0.270
>100%
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO,):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (.C):
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Control
09-12-21 09-14-21 09-16-21 }4;:%
24-h 24.25-h 24-h (`
7.1 3.1 3.1 60, 59, 61
50 56 52 92, 94, 92
365 360 415 a
0.10o.8 1.9 0.7
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV:
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEL:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Survival Growth
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
100% 100%
>100% >100%
>100% >100%
Visual Insp. I Dunnett's
Survival Growth
%Effluent Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
45% 2.410 -3.997
67.5% 2.410 -0.108
90% 2.410 -0.216
g5% 2.410 0.630
100% 2.410 0.270
>100%
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV:
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEL:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Survival Growth
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
100% 100%
>100% >100%
>100% >100%
Visual Insp. I Dunnett's
Survival Growth
%Effluent Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
45% 2.410 -3.997
67.5% 2.410 -0.108
90% 2.410 -0.216
g5% 2.410 0.630
100% 2.410 0.270
>100%
Survival Growth
%Effluent Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
45% 2.410 -3.997
67.5% 2.410 -0.108
90% 2.410 -0.216
g5% 2.410 0.630
100% 2.410 0.270
>100%
>100%

o 07 PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
\. Fax: [phone]
.: Env6°nmendlTnWgS°Inllonc Nr.
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test Date: October 16, 2021
Facility: Environment 1, Inc. NPDES If: NC 0024244 Pipe 0: 001 County: Stanly
City of Albemarle, Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutio s, Inc., Certificate k 37 Comments
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC):
DRC Phone / E-mail: 3 Y(� c�'(,e:,.�y ,.tc- -•<�-� Project 9: 16316
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Sample#: 211005.04, 211007.04, 211009.0
e-Mail to: [e-mail] Test Organisms: Plmephales promelas
Or Mail Original to: North Carolina Division of Water Resources supplier
Water Sciences Section /Aquatic Toxicology Branch In-house culture
1621 Mail Service Center Begin hatch: 10.Oq-21 1452
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 End hatch: iD-ofi-z1 ossa
Test Start Date: I October 05, 2021
Control
Organisms
• Effluent
45%
• Effluent
6Z5%
%Effluent
90%
Effluent
96%
Effluent
]00%
Water Quality Data
Replicate number
a
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Origina l number of larvae
1 10
1 10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae) 1
0.822
1 0.712
0.684
0.814
Surviving number of larvae
1 10
1 10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 0.787 1
0.812
0.781
0.667
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
110
1D
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/orlginai(mg/larvae)
0.726
0.726
0.702
0.676
surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
1 10
Welght/original (mg/larvaei 1
0.753
1 0.775
0.800 1
0.$25
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
1 10
10
Original number of larvae
10
1
10
1
10
10
Weight/original img/larvae)
0.825
0.820
0.773
0.795
surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
9
Original number of larvae
10
10
1 10
1 10
Welght/originallrndlarvae)
0.840
0.736 1
0.823 1
0.699
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.758
Averagewt/ 0,758
surviving (mg)
Survival
(%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.762
survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg)
survival (%) 100,0
Average wt(mg)
Survival (%) 100.0
Averagewt(mg) 1 0.803
Survival (%) 97.5
Average wt(mg, 0.775
Day 0
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Flnai
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial I
Final
Control
PH (su):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. ('C):
High Concentration
PH (Su):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
7.79 7.70
7.82
7.69
7.93
7.66
7.78
7.70
7.71
7.66
7.77
7,75
7.69
7.8 7.6
7.7
7.8
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.6
M�L
24.7 24.4
24.7
24.6
24.8
24.6
24.7
24.7
24.8
24.5
24.7
24.5
24.8
6.11
6.41
6.34
6.40
6,47
6.52
6.60
6.54
6.46
6.50
6.60
6.68
6.54
6.44
7.7
7.6
8.0
7.6
8.0
7.47.87.8
24,6
24.5
24.6
24.5
25.0
24.4
25.0
24.8
25.0
24.6
24.8
24.5
25.0
24.3
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Control
Analyses
30.03.21
30.05-21
10-07-21
Survival
Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
IOD%
100%
>100%
>300%
>100%
>100%
Visual Insp.
Dunnett's
Survival
Growth
%Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
45%
2.410
-0.103
67.5%
2.410
1.390
90%
2.410
-0.833
95%
2.410
-1.246
100%
2.410
-0.454
Overall Analysis:
Result; PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%
DWR Report Form AT-5

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
N Fax: [phone]
-: Fnvlmnmenral Tesring Solull°ns. arc
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test Date: June 24, 2021
Facility: Environment 1, Inc. NPDES #: NC 0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
City of Albemarle, Long Creek WVVTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc., Certificate # 037 Comments
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC): n c3
ORCPhone /E-mail:-';U'1-- - 2Z 3 Y 10 te-,'-1C. e'n--" Project#: 15994
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: C.sample #: 210608.01, 210610.07, 210612.0
e-Mail to: ATForms.ATB(Zncdenr.eo Test Organisms: Pimepholes promelas
Or Mail Original to: North Carolina Division of Water Resources Supplier
Water Sciences Section / Aquatic Toxicology Branch In-house Culture
1621 Mail Service Center Begin hatch: 06-07-21 1500
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 End hatch: o6-oa-zl osoo
Test Start Date: June 08, 2021
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
45%
Effluent
67.5%
Effluent
90%
Effluent
95%
Effluent
100%
Replicate number
1 7 1 A
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.992
1 1.043
1.098
1.064
Surviving number of larvae
1 10
10
10
10
original number of larvae
1 10
10
10
1 10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 1.121
0.962
1 1.000
1 1.032
Surviving number of larvae
10
9
1C)
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
1.016
1 0.911
1 0.945 1
0.917
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.974
1 1.071
0.995
0.931
Surviving number of larvae
1 10
1 9
1 10
1 9
Original number of larvae
1 10
1 10
1 10
1 10
weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 1.008
1 0.970
1 1.02$
1 0.875
Surviving number of larvae
9
9
1 10
1 9
Original number of larvae
10
10
1 10
1 10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.864
1 0.920
1 0.796
1 0.725
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1.049
Averagewt/ 1 1.049
surviving (mg)
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 1.029
Survival(%) 97.5
Average wt (mg) 0.947
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 0.993
Survival (%) 95.0
Average wt (mg) 0.970
Survival (%) Dm
Average wt (mg) 1 0.826
Water Quality Data
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6
Initial I Final Initial I Final Initial I Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial I Final Initial I Final
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/LI:
Temp. (°C):
High Concentration
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
5.92
6.51
6.63
6.41
6.33
6.47
6.86
6.68
6.64
6.72
6.84
6.80
6.97
6.77
7.8
25.0
7.9
24.5
8.1
25.0
7.6
24.7
7.9
24.4
7.1
24.3
7,8
25.0
7.7
24.4
8.0
1 24.9
7.9
1 24.7
25.0
24.4
25.0
7.7
24.7
Sample Information
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Control
Analyses
Ofi-O6-21
06.08-21
06 10 21
Survival
Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
100%
95%
>100%
100%
>100%
97.5%
Visual Insp. I
Durrett's
Survival
Growth
% Effluent
Critical
CalculatedM24
Calculated
45%
0AS8
67.5%
2.278
90%
1.262
95%
1.764
100%
4.980
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: 100% NOEC: 95% ChV: 97.5%
DWR Report Form AT-5
8.17
7.89
8.08
7.90
8.14
7.58
8.17
7.90
8.12
7.94
8.21
7,89
8.23
7.94
7.7
7.8
7,8
7.7
7.7
7.1
7.fi
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.7
7.9
7.5
24.8
24.4
24.7
24.6
24.7
24.8
24.7
24.6
24.7
24.6
24.8
24.4
24.8
24.6

n (= q 7 PO Box 7565
i 1 F Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
FnMonmennlTe;Ung toluUan; Me
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test Date: January 01, 2022
Facility: Environment 1, Inc. NPDES r«: NC 0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
City of Albemarle, Long Creels W WTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.,.-Certjfjeate N 037 Comments
Signature of Operator in es opsible Charge (ORC):�_
ORC Phone / E-mail: r �' ; ' r, ,, Project 0: 16481
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: fG Sample #: 211207.01, 211209.01, 2I3111.0
e-Mail to: ATForms.ATBCdncdenr.gov Test Organisms: Pfinephales promelas
Or Mail Original to: North Carolina Division of Water Resources Supplier
Water Sciences Section / Aquatic Toxicology Branch In-house culture
1621 Mail Service Center Begin batch: 12-0fi-21 1502
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 End hatch: 12-07-21 0600
Test Start Date: 1 December 07, 2021
Replicate number
Control
Organisms
Effluent
45Y.
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%J 37�
Average wt (mg)
Average wt/
surviving (mg)
survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.700
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.651
0.774
0.791
0.814
survivingnumberoflarvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original(mg/farvae) 1
0.644 1
0.675
0.714
0.767 1
% Effluent
67.SYe
% Effluent
90%
•
Effluent
95%
% Effluent
loll%
Water Quality Data
Survivingnumberoflarvae
10
1 10
10
10
Original numberof larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original(mg/larvae)
0.710
1 0.783
1 0.726
1 0.666
soMving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Or(ginal numher of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original(mg/larvae( j
0.861 1
0.804
1 0,707
0.694
Surviving number of larvae
1 10
1 10
1 10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Welght/original(mg/larvae)
1 0.727
1 0.792 1
0.742
1 0.737
Survivingnumberoflarvae
10
1 10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
110
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.744
1 0.71IJ
0.765
1 0.804
survival (%) 0,0 10
Averagewt(mg) 1 0.721
Survival(%) 10060
Average wt (mg) 0.767
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg 0.750
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.756
Day D
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Initlai
Final
Initial
Final
Iriltlal
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Control
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
High Concentration
PH (5U):
00 (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
7.66
7.40
7.39
7.45
7.40
6.39
7.27
7.34
7.71
6,91
7.78
7.3B
7.70
7.62
7.7
7.6
7.8
7.9
7.8
7.4
7.7
BA
7.7
6.7
7.7
7.6
7.7
7,4
24.7
24.9
24.6
25.0
24.8
25.0
24.8
29.9
24,7
24.8
24.8
24.6
24.8
24.7
7.10
6.59
fi.63
6.68
6.63
6.54
6.74
6.63
6.42
6.67
6.97
6.99
7.04
6.78
7.8
7.6
7.8
7.8
8.2
7.4
8.1
6.6
8.0
6.7
8.0
7.8
8.1
7.9
25.6
24.9
24.7
24.9
25.0
24.8
24.7
25.0
29.6
25.0
25.0
24.6
24.7
24.6
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Control
Analyses
12-05•21
12.07-21
12.09.21
Survival
Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
100%
100%
>I00%
>700%
>100%
>300%
Visual Insp.
Dunne[['s
Survival
Growth
%Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
45%
2.910
67.5%
2.410
90%
2.410
A20
95%
2.41D
100%
2.410
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%
DWR Report Form AT-5

Process Narrative of City of Albemarle WWTP in support of NPDES renewal October, 2021
The Albemarle WWTP makes use of components of an older original plant combined with
newer and larger components located at a separate area approximately 0.9 miles to the SSE
and downstream on Long Creek. Because the plant is split in two, there are two process flow
and mass balance diagrams but the two campuses work as a single unit.
References for this narrative are the process flow diagrams;
004 LONG CREEK PLANT LAYOUT AND MASS FLOW DIAGRAM — UPPER PLANT.PDF
003 LONG CREEK PLANT LAYOUT AND MASS FLOW DIAGRAM — LOWER PLANT.PDF
Referencing the upper flow diagram (004) we see what looks like a working wastewater
treatment plant. This is the old original trickle bed plant that was retired; however, some
components continue to operate such as the headworks, influent lift station, and primary and
secondary solids holding basin.
The Albemarle wastewater collection system gravity flows into the headworks, comprised of
bar screens and grit chamber. The wastewater, cleared of large solids, then flows to the first of
two influent lift stations "A" and "B". Also seen on the upper plant diagram are waste holding
tanks. WAS from the lower plant enters two primary holding basins where it is gravity settled
with the decant routed back to the first influent PS "A". The thickened WAS is then pumped
over to the secondary solids holding tanks to await hauling for further processing. The screw
lifts of the first influent lift station provide enough head to gravity flow the 0.9 miles to the
second influent lift station located on the second campus.
Referencing the lower flow diagram (003), we see that this site is comprised of an influent lift
station "B", four aeration basins with six surface aerators each, four secondary clarifiers,
tertiary filters, chlorine disinfection, and the plant discharge.
The basins are laid out in pairs, in that the two basins to the southwest are a pair and the two
basins to the northeast are a pair. This can be seen in the 003 flow diagram where half of the
influent from lift station B goes to the splitter box of the southwestern pair (denoted as 0.5 Q)
and the other half of the influent goes to the northeastern pair splitter box. Untreated flow
from the headworks enters at the influent lift station B, where the multiple screws can partition
the flow into one or the other or both splitter boxes located on the berm between pairs of the
aeration basins. In this way the influent flow could go to either two or four aeration basins
depending on conditions. Each aeration basin is equipped with its own clarifier for biosolids
separation making each functionally independent. This also implies that if a problem or

necessary shutdown were to occur with one basin, that the second of the pair could continue to
operate. The pairs of clarifiers contribute their under flow to a single RAS/WAS lift station,
therefore there are two RAS/WAS lift stations in the plant. The ratio of WAS to RAS can be set
by adjusting the RPM of the lifting screws in the lift stations. The WAS flow from the WAS
screws flows to a central WAS pump station that then pumps the total WAS flows back to the
upper campus for decanting and solids separation and storage. The RAS flow from the lift
stations goes back to the splitter boxes on the basin berm to distribute to the aeration basins.
Overflow from the clarifiers flows to a single collection line that conducts the treated flow to
tertiary filters for further solids removal. The effluent of the filters then falls into the
disinfection chamber dosed with gaseous chlorine. The effluent then flows to an aeration tank
for dichlorination and subsequently flows to the discharge point.

,4 ■ :• ■
O c.. ■ ..
a �
•Stanly County nimal Protective Services s
"rip
_[NFLUENT PS UNIT "A"
OF 2 UNITS
�V raw j� _ ::s� - ,...�I ■
40,
41,
4- 401b
v
T
`. \\
C �/Cm
'll •oil Lom•
ffiAlbema le ity Wastewater Plant

w
06
w
v
U)

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Michael Ferris, City Manager
City of Albemarle
P. O. Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002-0190
Dear Mr. Ferris:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
November 2, 2020
Subject: SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit Number NCO024244
Collection System Permit WQCS00016
Stanly County
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) hereby transmits for yourrecords a copy of the signed Special
Order by Consent (SOC or the Order) approved by the Environmental Management Commission (EMC).
The SOC was signed October 30, 2020 and will be effective beginning October 1, 2020.
The terms and conditions of the Order are now in full effect, including those requiring submittal of written
notice of compliance or non-compliance with any SOC schedule date. To cover water -quality maintenance
costs, SOC fees include a $500.00 annual fee, pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3D.
If you have questions, please contact the operations staff at DWR's Mooresville Regional Office at
[phone], or contact me in the central office, Derek Denard [[e-mail]] at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Derek Denard, Environmental Specialist
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Attachment: Copy EMC SOC WQ S19-007
cc: SOC Files
cc: NPDES Files [Laserfiche]
DWR/MRO Corey Basinger [[e-mail]]; Roberto Scheller [[e-mail]]
DWR/WQPS Christyn Fertenbaugh [[e-mail]]
City of Albemarle -Michael Ferris [[e-mail]]; Judy Redwine, [e-mail]]
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NORTH C OROLINA -
oaPammem i Environmental auai� e ` 919.707.9000

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF STANLY
IN THE MATTER OF )
NORTH CAROLINA )
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO024244 )
PERMIT NO. WQCS00016 )
HELD BY )
THE CITY OF ALBEMARLE )
SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statute (G.S.)143-215.2 and G.S. 143-215.67,
this Special Order by Consent is entered into by the City of Albemarle, hereinafter referred to as
the City, and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency of the State
of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the Commission:
1. The City and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) The City holds North Carolina NPDES Permit NCO024244 for operation of an existing
wastewater treatment works and for making an outlet therefrom for the discharge of
treated wastewater to Long Creek, Class C waters of this State in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. The City is unable to consistently comply with the final effluent limits,
including Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Ammonia Nitrogen, Total Suspended
Solids (TSS), and Fecal Coliform. The City is unable to comply with operational
requirements as set forth in NPDES Permit NCO024244 due to high levels of inflow and
infiltration entering the City's sewer lines, and the WWTP's inability to handle low
influent concentrations of BOD. The City also holds North Carolina Collection System
Permit WQCS00016 for operation of an existing wastewater collection system, but is
unable to consistently comply with permit Condition 1.2 regarding sanitary sewer
overflows (SSOs) as set forth in Collection System Permit WQCS00016. Compliance
will require preparation of plans and specifications for collection system upgrades
including, but not limited to, pump station upgrades/improvements and sewer lime (force
main) rehabilitation to be conducted in three phases.
(b) Noncompliance with final effluent limitations constitutes, causing, and contributing to
pollution of the waters of this State named above, and the City is within the jurisdiction
of the Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) The City has secured a grant or has otherwise secured financing for planning, design, and
construction/repairs of the following:
i. New or improved wastewater treatment and disposal system components as described
in Attachment B which, once constructed and operated, will be sufficient to
adequately convey and treat wastewater presently being discharged, to such an extent
that the City will be able to comply with the final effluent limits and operational

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Page 2 of 6
requirements as set forth in NPDES Permit NC0024244.
ii. A new or improved wastewater collection system which, once constructed and operated,
will be sufficient to adequately collect wastewater presently being made tributary to the
collection system, within the Sanitary Sewer Rehab Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 such
that the City will be able to comply with permit Condition 1.2 regarding sanitary sewer
overflows (SSOs) as set forth in Collection System Permit WQCS00016.
(d) Since this Special Order is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for a contested
case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
2. The City, desiring to comply with the Permits identified in paragraph l(a) and 1(b) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake the following activities in accordance with the indicated time schedule:
Scheduled Activity
Due Date
Submit Quarterly Progress Reports
(see details in paragraph 2(b) below.)
Beginning October 15, 2020
For Collection System Permit W CS00016:
Complete Sanitary Sewer Rehab, Phase 1
December 31, 2014 (Met)
Begin construction on Sanitary Sewer Rehab, Phase 2
July 31, 2019 (Met)
Apply for funding for Sanitary Sewer Rehab, Phase 3
September 30, 2019 (Met)
Receive Letter of Intent to Fund for Phase 3
March 31, 2020 (Met)
Submit finished plans and specifications for review for Phase 3
September 30, 2021
Complete construction on Phase 2
November 30, 2020
Begin Construction and execute construction contract for Phase 3
March 31, 2022
Complete construction on Phase 3
March 31, 2023
Review infrastructure improvements for maintaining compliance
September 30, 2023
Attain Compliance with the Collection System Permit
September 30, 2023
For NPDES Permit NCO024244:
Begin implementation or construction of WWTP improvements
items in Attachment B.
March 31, 2022
Complete construction of all WWTP improvements
September 30, 2023
Attain Compliance with NPDES permit limits
September 30, 2023
(b) The City will submit quarterly progress reports detailing the work and activities undertaken and
completed on the upgrades to the collection system. The reports are to be submitted as follows:
one copy must be mailed to the Mooresville Regional Office Supervisor, Division of Water

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Page 3 of 6
Resources / Water Quality Regional Operations Section, 610 East Center Avenue, Suite
301, Mooresville, NC 28115, and one copy must be mailed to the Water Quality
Permitting Section / NPDES,1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. The
quarterly reports are due in each respective office no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of
January, April, July, and October for the duration of this Order.
(c) The City will comply with all terms and conditions of the permit except effluent limits for
parameters identified in paragraph 1(a) above. See Attachment A for all current monitoring
requirements and effluent limits, including interim effluent limits applicable to this Special
Order by Consent. The City may also be required to monitor for other parameters, as
deemed necessary by the Director, in future permits or administrative letters. During the
time in which this Special Order by Consent is effective, the City shall comply with the
interim effluent limits for Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(BOD), Ammonia Nitrogen, and Fecal Coliform as listed in the table below.
Under this SOC, only the parameters listed below have been modified from the most
current NPDES Permit NCO024244 in effect for Outfall 001.
Parameters
Units
Permit Limits
Interim Limits
Monthly
Avg.
Weekly
Avg.
Monthly
Avg.
Weekly
Avg.
BOD (s)
mg/L
10.0
15.0
15.0
35.0
BOD (w)
mg/L
20.0
30.0
25.0
35.0
TSS
mg/L
30.0
45.0
35.0
50.0
Ammonia Nitrogen (s
m /L
1.1
3.3
5.0
15.0
Ammonia Nitrogen w
mg/L
2.6
7.8
5.0
15.0
Fecal Coliform
#/100 mL
200*
400*
400*
800*
s = summer (April 1 — October 31); w = winter (November 1 — March 31)
* = geometric mean
(d) No later than fifteen (15) calendar days after any date identified for accomplishment of
any activity listed in 2(a) above, the City shall submit to the Water Quality Regional
Operations Section Regional Supervisor for the Division of Water Resources' (DWR)
Mooresville Regional Office written notice of compliance or noncompliance therewith. In
the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of the reason(s) for
noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement identifying the extent to which
subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of listed activities may be affected.
(e) The City will continue to operate the wastewater treatment plant as best as possible to
prevent/minimize any adverse impacts to the surface waters.
3. The City, desiring to comply with the Permits identified in paragraph l(a) above, hereby
agrees to the following settlement of outstanding civil penalties, an upfront penalty, and
stipulated penalties:
(a) The City has outstanding civil penalty assessments that total $60,054.33. As settlement of
all alleged violations of NPDES permit number NCO024244 and WQCS00016 prior to

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Page 4 of 6
entering into this Special Order by Consent, the City agrees to pay an upfront penalty
amount of $1,679.33, with the remaining amount of $58,375.00 to be held in abeyance
until the successful completion of this SOC.
(b) At the successful conclusion of this Special Order by Consent, the penalty amount held in
abeyance ($58,375.00) will be remitted. Should the Special Order by Consent not reach a
successful conclusion, the full remaining penalty amount of $58,375.00 will be due
immediately by check payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality and forwarded to the Director.
(c) The City agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), the City will pay the
Director of DWR, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality, stipulated penalties according to the following schedule for failure to meet the
deadlines set out in paragraphs 2(a), 2(b), and 2(d); and interim effluent limits and
monitoring requirements set out in paragraph 2(c):
Violation Description
I Stipulated Penalty
For Collection Sys mPermit W CS00016.
• $250 per SSO greater than 1,000 gallons
Any reportable Sanitary Sewer Overflow
and less than 100,000 gallons. (to be
(SSO)
paid on a monthly basis)
• $500 per SSO greater than 100,001
gallons to be paid on a monthly basis
• $250 per bypass less than 100,000
Any reportable bypass
gallons (to be paid on a monthly basis)
• $500 per bypass greater than 100,001
gallons to be paid on a monthly basis
For NPDESPermit NCO024244:
Failure to meet a scheduled date
$1,000 per day
• $1,000 for exceeding monthly average
Failure to comply with a modified effluent
(or geometric mean) limit
limit
• $500 for exceeding weekly average (or
geometric mean) limits (to be paid on a
monthly basis
Monitoring frequency violations for
$100 per omitted value per parameter (to
modified parameters
be paid on a monthly basis)
$1,000 for the first violation; penalty
Failure to Submit Status Reports
doubles with each subsequent
assessment for late reports
Failure to achieve compliance with final
$5,000 (single penalty)
effluent limits
(d) Certified checks are to be made payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality and forwarded to Director of DWR at 1617 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Page 5 of 6
4. The City and the Commission agree that the stipulated penalties are not due if the City
satisfies DWR that noncompliance was caused solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be available if
the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant or if the act or
omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship with the permittee;
d. An extraordinary event beyond the permittee's control. Contractor delays or failure to
obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the permittee's control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or challenge
them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, will be grounds for a collection
action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate. The only issue in such an
action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Order by Consent is subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulations, including injunctive relief pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6.C.
6. This Special Order by Consent and any terms or conditions contained herein, hereby
supersede any and all previous Special Orders, Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letters,
terms, conditions, and limits contained therein issued in connection with NPDES permit
number NCO024244 and Collection System Permit WQCS00016. In the event of an NPDES
permit modification or renewal, any effluent limit or monitoring requirements contained
therein shall supersede those contained in Attachment A of this Special Order by Consent,
except as modified and contained in paragraph 2(c) above.
7. This Special Order by Consent maybe amended provided the City has made good faith
efforts to secure funding, complete all construction and achieve compliance within the dates
specified.
8. During the term of this Special Order by Consent, the City will not be permitted to accept
additional wastewater from any domestic, industrial, or commercial sources without prior
approval from the Mooresville Regional Supervisor and the Water Quality Permitting
Section.

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Page 6 of 6
9. Failure to meet the scheduled date identified in paragraph 2(a) may terminate this Special
Order by Consent and require the City to comply with the terms and conditions contained in
the permits identified in paragraph 1(a).
10. The City, upon signature of this Special Order by Consent, will be expected to comply with
all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
This Special Order by Consent shall expire December 31, 2023.
For the City of Albemarle:
I
r
Michael Ferris, City Manager
l' M4 Z020
Date
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
S. Daniel Smith, Director Date
Division of Water Resources

ATTACHMENT A PermitNC0024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Part I
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (12.0 MGD
INTERIM) [15A NCAC 0213.0400 et seq., 15A NCAC 02B.0500 et seq.]
Grade IV Biological Water Pollution Control System [15A NCAC 08G .0302]
a. During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be
limited and monitored 1 by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENTLIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PARAMETER CHARACTERISTICS
Parameter Code
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location2
Flow 50050
12.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3 C0310
15.0 mglL*
35.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Influent and
(April 1 -October 31)
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3 C0310
25.0 mg/L*
35.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Influent and
(November 1 - March 31)
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
C0530
35.0 mglL*
50.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Influent and
(TSS) 3
Effluent
NH3 as N C0610
(April 1 -October 31)
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N C0610
(November 1 - March 31)
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 00300
Daily Average > 5.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform 31616
4001100 mL*
8001100 mL*
Daily
Grab
Effluent
(geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine 50060
(TRC) 4
18 Ng/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen C0600
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
(NO2+NO3+TKN) (mg/L)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L) C0665
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 5 TGP38
Ceriodaphnia dubia Pass/Fail at 90%
Quarter) y
Composite
p
Effluent
effluent
Conductivity (pmhos/cm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Hardness (as CaCO3) 6 00900
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
(mg/L)
Total Cadmium 6,7 01027
2.2 fag/L
16.0 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Chromium 6,8 01034
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chromium VI 6,8 01032
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper 6,8 01042
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver 6, 9 (Ng/L) 01077
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Page 1 of 6

ATTACHMENT A PermitNC0024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 39100
(N g/L)
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Color (ADMI) 10 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
pH 00400
Between 6.0 and 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Scan NC01
Monitor and Report
Footnote 11
Footnote 11
Effluent
Total Hardness (as CaCO3)12 00900
(mg/L)
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
U
Conductivity (pmhoslcm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (mg/L) 00300
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Total Copper (Ng/L) 01042
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Grab
U, D1, D2
Color (ADMI) 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Grab
U, D3
SOC Limits are effective beginning on the effective date of the SOC and lasting until the SOC
compliance date on September 30, 2023. The SOC shall expire on December 31, 2023.
Footnotes:
1. The Permittee shall submit discharge monitoring reports electronically using the NC DWR's eDMR
application system; see Section A. (9.).
2. U = at least 100 feet above the discharge point. D 1 = approximately 2620 feet below the discharge point. D2
= 3.9 miles downstream at NCSR 1967. D3 = approximately 200 yards downstream from the discharge point,
for color samples only. Stream samples shall be collected monthly from October 1 through May 30, and
weekly from June 1 through September 30.
3. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (8 5 % removal).
4. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/L to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina
certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/L.
5. Whole Effluent Toxicity shall be monitored using the Pass/Fail Chronic Toxicity test with Ceriodaphnia
dubia at 90% effluent. Samples shall be taken in March, June, September, and December•, see Section A. (4.).
6. Effluent Hardness samples shall coincide with sampling of metals.
7. These interim limitations for Total Cadmium shall be complied with until September 1, 2025.
8. Total Chromium, Chromium VI and Total Copper shall be monitored until limits for Chromium VI and Total
Copper in Section A. (2.) become effective September 1, 2025. Total Chromium monitoring is to determine
the proportion of Chromium VI in Total Chromium.
9. Total Silver shall be monitored using "clean" sampling techniques and reported to the lower reporting level of
the procedure.
10. See Section A. (6.) for Color Reopener and Monitoring Requirements.
11. The Permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit; see Section A. (5.).
12. The Permittee shall sample instream hardness, upstream of the facility's discharge. The sample shall be
representative of the hardness in the receiving stream.
b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 2 of 6

ATTACHMENT A PermitNC0024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (12.0 MGD
FINAL) [15A NCAC 0213.0400 et seq., 15A NCAC 02B.0500 et seq.]
Grade IV Biological Water Pollution Control System [15A NCAC 08G .0302]
a. During the period beginning September 1, 2025 and lasting until expansion above 12.0 MGD (and
receipt of the Engineer's Certificate of completion) or expiration, whichever is sooner, the Permittee
is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored 1 by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENTLIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PARAMETER CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
Parameter Code
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location
Flow 50050
12.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3
Influent and
C0310
(April 1 -October 31)
15.0 mg/L*
35.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3
Influent and
C0310
(November 1- March 31)
25.0 mg/L*
35.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 3 C0530
35.0 mg/L*
50.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Influent and
Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 -October 31) C0610
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
(November 1 March 31) C0610
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 00300
Daily Average > 5.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean) 31616
400/100 mL*
800/100 mL*
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)4 50060
18 pg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) C0600
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
(mg/L)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L) C0665
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 5 TGP38
Ceriodaphnia dubia Pass/Fail at 90%
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
effluent
Conductivity (pmhos/cm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Hardness (as CaCO3) 6
00900
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
(mg/L)
Total Cadmium 6 01027
1.12 Hg/L
6.62 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Chromium 6(pg/L) 01034
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chromium VI 6 01032
11.9 Hg/L
17.2 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper 6 01042
16.09 pg/L
22.52 Ng/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver 6,7(pg/L) 01077
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 39100
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
(N g/L)
Color (ADMI) 8 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
pH 00400
Between 6.0 and 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Scan NC01
Monitor and Report
Footnote 9
Footnote 9
Effluent
Page 3 of 6

ATTACHMENT A PermitNC0024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Total Hardness (as CaCO3)10 00900
(mg/L)
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
U
Conductivity (pmhos/cm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (mg/L) 00300
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Total Copper (Ng/L) 01042
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Grab
U, D1, D2
Color (ADMI) 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Grab
U, D3
SOC Limits are effective beginning on the effective date of the SOC and lasting until the SOC
compliance date on September 30, 2023. The SOC shall expire on December 31, 2023.
Footnotes:
1. The Permittee shall submit discharge monitoring reports electronically using the NC DWR's eDMR
application system; see A. (9.).
2. U = at least 100 feet above the discharge point. D 1 = approximately 2620 feet below the discharge point. D2
= 3.9 miles downstream at NCSR 1967. D3 = approximately 200 yards downstream from the discharge point,
for color samples only. Stream samples shall be collected monthly from October 1 through May 30, and
weekly from June 1 through September 30.
3. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (8 5 % removal).
4. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/L to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a No rth Caro lina
certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/L.
5. Whole Effluent Toxicity shall be monitored using the Pass/Fail Chronic Toxicity test with Ceriodaphnia
dubia at 90% effluent. Samples shall be taken in March, June, September, and December; see Section A. (4.).
6. Effluent Hardness samples shall coincide with sampling of metals.
7. Total Silver shall be monitored using "clean" sampling techniques and reported to the lower reporting level of
the procedure.
8. See Section A. (6.) for Color Reopener and Monitoring Requirements.
9. The Permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit; see Section A. (5.).
10. The Permittee shall sample instream hardness, upstream of the facility's discharge. The sample shall be
representative of the hardness in the receiving stream.
b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 4 of 6

ATTACHMENT A PermitNC0024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (16.0 MGD)
[15A NCAC 02B.0400 et seq., 15A NCAC 0213.0500 et seq.]
Grade IV Biological Water Pollution Control System [15A NCAC 08G .0302]
a. During the period beginning on expansion above 12.0 MGD and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be
limited and monitored) by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PARAMETER CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
Parameter Code
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location
Flow 50050
16.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3
Influent and
C0310
(April 1 -October 31)
15.0 mg/L*
35.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3
Influent and
C0310
(November 1- March 31)
25.0 mg/L*
35.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
Influent and
(TSS) 3 C0530
35.0 mg/L*
50.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 -October 31) C0610
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
(November 1 March 31) C0610
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 00300
Daily Average > 5.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
I Effluent
Fecal Coliform
31616
(geometric mean)
400/100 mL*
800/100 mL*
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
(TRC) 4 50060
18 pg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen C0600
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
(NO2+NO3+TKN) (mg/L)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L) C0665
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 5 TGP38
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Conductivity (pmhoslcm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
rdn
[ Hardness- Total as CaCO3
or + Mg)] 6 (m00900
(CaTotal
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Cadmium 6 01027
1.1 pg/L
6.5 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Chromium 6(pg/L) 01034
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chromium VI 6 01032
11.7 Ng/L
16.9 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper 6 01042
15.78 pg/L
22.15 lug/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver 6,7 (Ng/L) 01077
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 39100
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
(ug/L)
Color (ADMI) 8 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
pH 00400
Between 6.0 and 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
I Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Scan NC01
Monitor and Report
Footnote 9
Footnote 9
1 Effluent
Page 5 of 6

ATTACHMENT A PermitNC0024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
Hardness- Total as [CaCO3 00900
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
U
or (Ca + Mg)] 10 (mg/L)
Conductivity 00094
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 00300
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
(mg/L)
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Total Copper (pg/L) 01042
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Grab
U, D1, D2
Color (ADMI) 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Grab
U, D3
* SOC Limits are effective beginning on the effective date of the SOC and lasting until the SOC
compliance date on September 30, 2023. The SOC shall expire on December 31, 2023.
Footnotes:
1. The Permittee shall submit discharge monitoring reports electronically using the NC DWR's eDMR
application system; see Section A. (9.).
2. U = at least 100 feet above the discharge point. D 1 = approximately 2620 feet below the discharge point. D2
= 3.9 miles downstream at NCSR 1967. D3 = approximately 200 yards downstream from the discharge point,
for color samples only. Stream samples shall be collected monthly from October 1 through May 3 0, and
weekly from June 1 through September 30.
3. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (8 5 % removal).
4. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/L to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a No rth Caro lina
certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/L.
5. Whole Effluent Toxicity shall be monitored using the Pass/Fail Chronic To xic ity te st with Ceriodaphnia
dubia at 90% effluent. Samples shall be taken in March, June, September, and December; see Section A. (4.).
6. Effluent Hardness samples shall coincide with sampling of metals.
7. Total Silver shall be monitored using "clean" sampling techniques and reported to the lower reporting level of
the procedure.
8. See Section A. (6.) for Color Reopener and Monitoring Requirements.
9. The Permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit; see Section A. (5.).
10. The Permittee shall sample instream hardness, upstream of the facility's discharge. The sample shall be
representative of the hardness in the receiving stream.
b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 6 of 6

ATTACHMENT B
EMC SOC WQ S19-007
City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP Improvements
Brief Proiect Description
The Long Creek WWTP improvements will include implementation and/or construction of the
following items:
• Perform electrical upgrades to the electrical grid at the WWTP to ensure reliability of
WWTP in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0124.
• Conduct engineering study of hydraulic loading to individual waste treatment trains to
operate aeration basin and secondary clarifier train independently of other treatment trains to
accommodate fluctuating flows into WWTP.
• Perform necessary construction, piping, and valving to operate each treatment train
independently of each other.
Page 1 of 1

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF STANLY
IN THE MATTER OF )
NORTH CAROLINA )
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO024244 )
PERMIT NO. WQCS00016 )
HELD BY )
THE CITY OF ALBEMARLE )
SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
EMC SOC WQ S19-007 Ad I
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.2 and G.S. 143-215.67,
this amendment to a Special Order by Consent is entered into by the City of Albemarle,
hereinafter referred to as the City, and the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, an agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 14313-282, and hereinafter
referred to as the Commission:
1. The City and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) The City holds North Carolina NPDES Permit NCO024244 for operation of an existing
wastewater treatment works and for making an outlet therefrom for the discharge of
treated wastewater to Long Creek, Class C waters of this State in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. The City is unable to consistently comply with the final effluent limits,
including Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Ammonia Nitrogen, Total Suspended
Solids (TSS), and Fecal Coliform. The City is unable to comply with operational
requirements as set forth in NPDES Permit NCO024244 due to high levels of inflow and
infiltration entering the City's sewer lines, and the WWTP's inability to handle low
influent concentrations of BOD. The City also holds North Carolina Collection System
Permit WQCS00016 for operation of an existing wastewater collection system, but is
unable to consistently comply with permit Condition 1.2 regarding sanitary sewer
overflows (SSOs) as set forth in Collection System Permit WQCS00016. Compliance
will require preparation of plans and specifications for collection system upgrades
including, but not limited to, pump station upgrades/improvements and sewer line (force
main) rehabilitation to be conducted in three phases.
(b) Noncompliance with final effluent limitations constitutes, causing, and contributing to
pollution of the waters of this State named above, and the City is within the jurisdiction
of the Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) The City has secured a grant or has otherwise secured financing for planning, design, and
construction/repairs of the following:
i. New or improved wastewater treatment and disposal system components as described
in Attachment B which, once constructed and operated, will be sufficient to
adequately convey and treat wastewater presently being discharged, to such an extent

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S 19-007 Ad I
Page 2 of 6
that the City will be able to comply with the final effluent limits and operational
requirements as set forth in NPDES Permit NC0024244.
ii. A new or improved wastewater collection system which, once constructed and operated,
will be sufficient to adequately collect wastewater presently being made tributary to the
collection system, within the Sanitary Sewer Rehab Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 such
that the City will be able to comply with permit Condition 1.2 regarding sanitary sewer
overflows (SSOs) as set forth in Collection System Permit WQCS00016.
(d) Since this Special Order is by Consent, neither parry will file a petition for a contested
case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
2. The City, desiring to comply with the Permits identified in paragraph l(a) and l (b) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake the following activities in accordance with the indicated time schedule:
Scheduled Activity
Due Date
Submit Quarterly Progress Reports
(see details in paragraph 2(b) below.)
Beginning October 15, 2020
(Ongoing)
For Collection System Permit W CS00016:
Complete Sanitary Sewer Rehab, Phase 1
December 31, 2014 (Met)
Begin construction on Sanitary Sewer Rehab, Phase 2
July 31, 2019 (Met)
Apply for funding for Sanitary Sewer Rehab, Phase 3
September 30, 2019 (Met)
Receive Letter of Intent to Fund for Phase 3
March 31, 2020 (Met)
Submit finished plans and specifications for review for Phase 3
September 30, 2021 (Met)
Complete construction on Phase 2
November 30, 2020 (Met)
Begin Construction and execute construction contract for Phase 3
January 31, 2023
Complete construction on Phase 3
June 30, 2024
Review infrastructure improvements for maintaining compliance
November 30, 2024
Attain Compliance with the Collection System Permit
November 30, 2024
For NPDES Permit NCO024244:
Begin implementation or construction of WWTP improvements
items in Attachment B.
July 31, 2024
Complete construction of all WWTP improvements
February 28, 2026
Attain Compliance with NPDES permit limits
May 31, 2026
(b) The City will submit quarterly progress reports detailing the work and activities undertaken and
completed on the upgrades to the collection system. The reports are to be submitted as follows:

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S 19-007 Ad I
Page 3 of 6
one copy must be mailed to the Mooresville Regional Office Supervisor, Division of Water
Resources / Water Quality Regional Operations Section, 610 East Center Avenue, Suite
301, Mooresville, NC 28115, and one copy must be mailed to the Water Quality
Permitting Section / NPDES,1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. The
quarterly reports are due in each respective office no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of
January, April, July, and October for the duration of this Order.
(c) The City will comply with all terms and conditions of the permit except effluent limits for
parameters identified in paragraph 1(a) above. See Attachment A for all current monitoring
requirements and effluent limits, including interim effluent limits applicable to this Special
Order by Consent. The City may also be required to monitor for other parameters, as
deemed necessary by the Director, in future permits or administrative letters. During the
time in which this Special Order by Consent is effective, the City shall comply with the
interim effluent limits for Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(BOD), Ammonia Nitrogen, and Fecal Coliform as listed in the table below.
Under this SOC, only the parameters listed below have been modified from the most
current NPDES Permit NCO024244 in effect for Outfall 001.
Parameters
Units
Permit Limits
Interim Limits
Monthly
Avg.
Weekly
Avg.
Monthly
Avg.
Weekly
Avg.
BOD s
m /L
10.0
15.0
15.0
35.0
BOD w
m /L
20.0
30.0
25.0
35.0
TSS
m /L
30.0
45.0
35.0
50.0
Ammonia Nitrogen (s
m /L
1.1
3.3
5.0
15.0
Ammonia Nitrogen w
m /L
2.6
7.8
5.0
15.0
Fecal Coliform
#/100 mL
200*
400*
400*
800*
s = summer (April 1 — October 31); w = winter (November 1 — March 31)
* = geometric mean
(d) No later than fifteen (15) calendar days after any date identified for accomplishment of
any activity listed in 2(a) above, the City shall submit to the Water Quality Regional
Operations Section Regional Supervisor for the Division of Water Resources' (DWR)
Mooresville Regional Office written notice of compliance or noncompliance therewith. In
the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of the reason(s) for
noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement identifying the extent to which
subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of listed activities may be affected.
(e) The City will continue to operate the wastewater treatment plant as best as possible to
prevent/minimize any adverse impacts to the surface waters.
3. The City, desiring to comply with the Permits identified in paragraph l(a) above, hereby
agrees to the following settlement of outstanding civil penalties, an upfront penalty, and
stipulated penalties:
(a) The City has outstanding civil penalty assessments that total $60,054.33. As settlement of

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S 19-007 Ad I
Page 4 of 6
all alleged violations of NPDES permit number NCO024244 and WQCS00016 prior to
entering into this Special Order by Consent, the City agrees to pay an upfront penalty
amount of $1,679.33, with the remaining amount of $58,375.00 to be held in abeyance
until the successful completion of this SOC.
(b) At the successful conclusion of this Special Order by Consent, the penalty amount held in
abeyance ($58,375.00) will be remitted. Should the Special Order by Consent not reach a
successful conclusion, the full remaining penalty amount of $58,375.00 will be due
immediately by check payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality and forwarded to the Director.
(c) The City agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), the City will pay the
Director of DWR, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality, stipulated penalties according to the following schedule for failure to meet the
deadlines set out in paragraphs 2(a), 2(b), and 2(d); and interim effluent limits and
monitoring requirements set out in paragraph 2(c):
Violation Description
I Stipulated alty
For Collection Sys m Permit W CS00016:
• $250 per SSO greater than 1,000 gallons
Any reportable Sanitary Sewer Overflow
and less than 100,000 gallons. (to be
(SSO)
paid on a monthly basis)
• $500 per SSO greater than 100,001
gallons to be paid on a monthly basis
• $250 per bypass less than 100,000
Any reportable bypass
gallons (to be paid on a monthly basis)
• $500 per bypass greater than 100,001
gallons to be paid on a monthly basis
For NPDES Permit NCO024244:
Failure to meet a scheduled date
$1,000 per day
• $1,000 for exceeding monthly average
Failure to comply with a modified effluent
(or geometric mean) limit
limit
• $500 for exceeding weekly average (or
geometric mean) limits (to be paid on a
monthly basis
Monitoring frequency violations for
$100 per omitted value per parameter (to
modified parameters
be paid on a monthly basis
$1,000 for the first violation; penalty
Failure to Submit Status Reports
doubles with each subsequent
assessment for late reports
Failure to achieve compliance with final
$5,000 (single penalty)
effluent limits
(d) Certified checks are to be made payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality and forwarded to Director of DWR at 1617 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S 19-007 Ad I
Page 5 of 6
4. The City and the Commission agree that the stipulated penalties are not due if the City
satisfies DWR that noncompliance was caused solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be available if
the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant or if the act or
omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship with the permittee;
d. An extraordinary event beyond the permittee's control. Contractor delays or failure to
obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the permittee's control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or challenge
them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, will be grounds for a collection
action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate. The only issue in such an
action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Order by Consent is subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulations, including injunctive relief pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6.C.
6. This Special Order by Consent and any terms or conditions contained herein, hereby
supersede any and all previous Special Orders, Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letters,
terms, conditions, and limits contained therein issued in connection with NPDES permit
number NCO024244 and Collection System Permit WQCS00016. In the event of an NPDES
permit modification or renewal, any effluent limit or monitoring requirements contained
therein shall supersede those contained in Attachment A of this Special Order by Consent,
except as modified and contained in paragraph 2(c) above.
7. This Special Order by Consent may be amended provided the City has made good faith
efforts to secure funding, complete all construction and achieve compliance within the dates
specified.
8. During the term of this Special Order by Consent, the City will not be permitted to accept
additional wastewater from any domestic, industrial, or commercial sources without prior
approval from the Mooresville Regional Supervisor and the Water Quality Permitting
Section.

City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
EMC SOC WQ S19-007 Ad I
Page 6 of 6
9. Failure to meet the scheduled date identified in paragraph 2(a) may terminate this Special
Order by Consent and require the City to comply with the terms and conditions contained in
the permits identified in paragraph 1(a).
10. The City, upon signature of this Special Order by Consent, will be expected to comply with
all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
This Special Order by Consent shall expire August 31, 2026.
For the City of Albemarle:
:a , a
Michael F ris, City Manager
City of Albemarle
17 2o-Z L
Date
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Richard E. Rogers, Jr., Director
Division of Water Resources
Date

ATTACHMENT A Permit NCO024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007 Ad I
Part I
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (12.0 MGD
INTERIM) [15A NCAC 0213.0400 et seq., 15A NCAC 02B.0500 et seq.]
Grade IV Biological Water Pollution Control System [15A NCAC 08G .0302]
a. During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be
limited and monitored i by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PARAMETER CHARACTERISTICS
Parameter Code
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location 2
Flow 50050
12.0 MGD
Continuous
RecordingInfluent
or
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3 C0310
15.0 mglL*
35.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Influent and
(April 1 - October 31)
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3 C0310
25.0 mglL*
35.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Influent and
(November 1 - March 31)
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
(TSS) s C0530
35.0 mglL*
50.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Influent and
Effluent
NH3 as N C0610
(April 1 - October 31)
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N C0610
(November 1 - March 31)
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 00300
Daily Average > 5.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform 31616
(geometric mean)
4001100 mL*
800/100 mL*
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
50060
(TRC) 4
18 IL
u9
Dail Y
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen C0600
(NO2+NO3+TKN) (mg/L)
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
Total Phosphorus (mg/L) C0665
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 5 TGP38
Ceriodaphnia dubia Pass/Fail at 90%
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
effluent
Conductivity (pmhos/cm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Hardness (as CaCO3) 6 00900
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
(mg/L)
Total Cadmium 6,7 01027
2.2 pg/L
16.0 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Chromium 6,8 01034
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chromium VI 6,8 01032
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper 6, 8 01042
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver 6,9 (pg/L) 01077
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Page 1 of 6

ATTACHMENT A Permit NCO024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007 Ad I
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 39100
(pg/L)
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Color (ADMI) 10 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
pH 00400
Between 6.0 and 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Scan NC01
Monitor and Report
Footnote 11
Footnote 11
Effluent
Total Hardness (as CaCO3)12 00900
(mg/L)
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
U
Conductivity (lumhoslcm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (mg/L) 00300
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Total Copper (pg/L) 01042
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Grab
U, D1, D2
Color (ADMI) 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Grab
U, D3
* SOC Limits are effective beginning on the effective date of the SOC and lasting until the SOC
compliance date on May 31, 2026. The SOC shall expire on August 31, 2026.
Footnotes:
1. The Permittee shall submit discharge monitoring reports electronically using the NC DWR's eDMR
application system; see Section A. (9.).
2. U = at least 100 feet above the discharge point. D1 = approximately 2620 feet below the discharge point. D2
= 3.9 miles downstream at NCSR 1967. D3 = approximately 200 yards downstream from the discharge point,
for color samples only. Stream samples shall be collected monthly from October 1 through May 30, and
weekly from June I through September 30.
3. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
4. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/L to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina
certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/L.
5. Whole Effluent Toxicity shall be monitored using the Pass/Fail Chronic Toxicity test with Ceriodaphnia
dubia at 90% effluent. Samples shall be taken in March, June, September, and December•, see Section A. (4.).
6. Effluent Hardness samples shall coincide with sampling of metals.
7. These interim limitations for Total Cadmium shall be complied with until September 1, 2025.
8. Total Chromium, Chromium VI and Total Copper shall be monitored until limits for Chromium VI and Total
Copper in Section A. (2.) become effective September 1, 2025. Total Chromium monitoring is to determine
the proportion of Chromium VI in Total Chromium.
9. Total Silver shall be monitored using "clean" sampling techniques and reported to the lower reporting level of
the procedure.
10. See Section A. (6.) for Color Reopener and Monitoring Requirements.
11. The Permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit; see Section A. (5.).
12. The Permittee shall sample instream hardness, upstream of the facility's discharge. The sample shall be
representative of the hardness in the receiving stream.
b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 2 of 6

ATTACHMENT A Permit NCO024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007 Ad I
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (12.0 MGD
FINAL) [15A NCAC 0213.0400 et seq., 15A NCAC 0213.0500 et seq.]
Grade IV Biological Water Pollution Control System [15A NCAC 08G .0302]
a. During the period beginning September 1, 2025 and lasting until expansion above 12.0 MGD (and
receipt of the Engineer's Certificate of completion) or expiration, whichever is sooner, the Permittee
is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored i by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PARAMETER CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
Parameter Code
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location 2
Flow 50050
12.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3
Influent and
(April 1 -October 31) C0310
15.0 mglL*
35.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) 3
Influent and
(November 1- March 31) C0310
25.0 mglL*
35.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 3 C0530
35.0 mg/L*
50.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Influent and
Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 -October 31) C0610
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
C0610
(November 1- March 31)
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 00300
Daily Average > 5.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
31616
(geometric mean)
4001100 ML*
8001100 mL*
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) 4 50060
18 pg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) C0600
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
(mg/L)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L) C0665
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 6 TGP38
Ceriodaphnia dubia Pass/Fail at 90%
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
effluent
Conductivity (pmhos/cm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Hardness (as CaCO3) 6
00900
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
(mg/L)
Total Cadmium 6 01027
1.12 Ng/L
6.62 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Chromium 6 (pg/L) 01034
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chromium VI 6 01032
11.9 pg/L
17.2 lug/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper 6 01042
16.09 pg/L
22.52 Ng/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver 6,7 (pg/L) 01077
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 39100
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
(ug/L)
Color (ADMI) 8 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
pH 00400
1 Between 6.0 and 9.0 standard units
Daily
I Grab
I Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Scan NC01
I Monitor and Report
I Footnote 9
1 Footnote 9
1 Effluent
Page 3 of 6

ATTACHMENT A Permit NCO024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007 Ad I
Total Hardness (as CaCO3) 10 00900
(mg/L)
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
U
Conductivity (pmhos/cm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (mg/L) 00300
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Total Copper(ug/L) 01042
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Grab
U, D1, D2
Color (ADM 1) 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Grab
U, D3
SOC Limits are effective beginning on the effective date of the SOC and lasting until the SOC
compliance date on May 31, 2026. The SOC shall expire on August 31, 2026.
Footnotes:
1. The Permittee shall submit discharge monitoring reports electronically using the NC DWR's eDMR
application system; see A. (9.).
2. U = at least 100 feet above the discharge point. D1 = approximately 2620 feet below the discharge point. D2
= 3.9 miles downstream at NCSR 1967. D3 = approximately 200 yards downstream from the discharge point,
for color samples only. Stream samples shall be collected monthly from October 1 through May 30, and
weekly from June 1 through September 30.
3. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
4. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/L to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina
certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/L.
5. Whole Effluent Toxicity shall be monitored using the Pass/Fail Chronic Toxicity test with Ceriodaphnia
dubia at 90% effluent. Samples shall be taken in March, June, September, and December; see Section A. (4.).
6. Effluent Hardness samples shall coincide with sampling of metals.
7. Total Silver shall be monitored using "clean" sampling techniques and reported to the lower reporting level of
the procedure.
8. See Section A. (6.) for Color Reopener and Monitoring Requirements.
9. The Permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit; see Section A. (5.).
10. The Permittee shall sample instream hardness, upstream of the facility's discharge. The sample shall be
representative of the hardness in the receiving stream.
b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 4 of 6

ATTACHMENT A Permit NCO024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007 Ad I
A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (16.0 MGD)
[15A NCAC 02B.0400 et seq., 15A NCAC 02B.0500 et seq.]
Grade IV Biological Water Pollution Control System [15A NCAC 08G .0302]
a. During the period beginning on expansion above 12.0 MGD and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be
limited and monitored' by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PARAMETER CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
Parameter Code
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location 2
Flow 50050
16.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) s
Influent and
(April 1 -October 31) C0310
15.0 mglL*
35.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, (20°C) s
Influent and
(November 1- March 31) C0310
25.0 mglL*
35.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
Influent and
(TSS) s C0530
35.0 mglL*
50.0 mglL*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 -October 31) C0610
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
C0610
(November 1- March 31)
5.0 mg/L*
15.0 mg/L*
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 00300
Daily Average > 5.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
I Effluent
Fecal Coliform
31616
(geometric mean)
400/100 mL*
8001100 mL*
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
(TRC) a 50060
18 pg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen C0600
(NO2+NO3+TKN) (mg/L)
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
Total Phosphorus (mg/L) C0665
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 5 TGP3B
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Conductivity (pmhos/cm) 00094
Monitor and Report
Daily
Grab
Effluent
rdn
s a Hardness- Total [CaCO3
as
00900
or + Mg)]
(CaTotal
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Cadmium 6 01027
1.1 lug/L
6.5 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Chromium 6 (pg/L) 01034
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chromium VI 6 01032
11.7 fag/L
16.9 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper 6 01042
15.78 lug/L
22.15 pg/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver 6,7 (ug/L) 01077
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 39100
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
(Ng/L)
Color (ADMI) 8 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
pH 00400
Between 6.0 and 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Scan NC01
I Monitor and Report
I Footnote 9
Footnote 9
Effluent
Page 5 of 6

ATTACHMENT A Permit NCO024244
EMC SOC WQ S19-007 Ad I
Hardness- Total as [CaCO3 00900
Monitor and Report
p
Quarter) y
Grab
U
or (Ca + Mg)] 10 (mg/L)
Conductivity 00094
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 00300
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
(mg/L)
Temperature (°C) 00010
Monitor and Report
Variable 2
Grab
U, D1, D2
Total Copper (pg/L) 01042
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Grab
U, D1, D2
Color (ADMI) 00083
Monitor and Report
2/Month
Grab
U, D3
* SOC Limits are effective beginning on the effective date of the SOC and lasting until the SOC
compliance date on May 31, 2026. The SOC shall expire on August 31, 2026.
Footnotes:
1. The Permittee shall submit discharge monitoring reports electronically using the NC DWR's eDMR
application system; see Section A. (9.).
2. U = at least 100 feet above the discharge point. D1 = approximately 2620 feet below the discharge point. D2
= 3.9 miles downstream at NCSR 1967. D3 = approximately 200 yards downstream from the discharge point,
for color samples only. Stream samples shall be collected monthly from October 1 through May 30, and
weekly from June 1 through September 30.
3. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
4. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/L to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina
certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/L.
5. Whole Effluent Toxicity shall be monitored using the Pass/Fail Chronic Toxicity test with Ceriodaphnia
dubia at 90% effluent. Samples shall be taken in March, June, September, and December•, see Section A. (4.).
6. Effluent Hardness samples shall coincide with sampling of metals.
7. Total Silver shall be monitored using "clean" sampling techniques and reported to the lower reporting level of
the procedure.
8. See Section A. (6.) for Color Reopener and Monitoring Requirements.
9. The Permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit; see Section A. (5.).
10. The Permittee shall sample instream hardness, upstream of the facility's discharge. The sample shall be
representative of the hardness in the receiving stream.
b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 6 of 6

ATTACHMENT B
EMC SOC WQ S19-007 Ad I
City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP Improvements
Brief Proiect Description
The Long Creek WWTP improvements will include implementation and/or construction of the
following items:
• Perform electrical upgrades to the electrical grid at the WWTP to ensure reliability of
WWTP in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0124.
• Conduct engineering study of hydraulic loading to individual waste treatment trains to
operate aeration basin and secondary clarifier train independently of other treatment trains to
accommodate fluctuating flows into WWTP.
• Perform necessary construction, piping, and valving to operate each treatment train
independently of each other.
Page 1 of 1

NORTH CAROLINA 2022 303(D) LIST
Rocky Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
AU Name
AU ID Description
Big Bear Creek
F_ 2278 From source to Long Creek
PARAMETER IR CATEGORY
(Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW) 5
AU Number Classification
13-17-31-5 F
AU_LengthArea AU —Units
19.9 FW Miles
CRITERIA STATUS REASON FOR RATING 303D YEAR
Exceeding Criteria Fair, Poor or Severe Bioclassification 2014
Long Creek
13312 From Little Long Creek to Rocky River
13-17-31b
2.2 FW Miles
PARAMETER IR CATEGORY
CRITERIA STATUS
REASON FOR RATING
303D YEAR
Copper (7 µg/I, AL, FW) 5
Exceeding Criteria
Legacy Category 5 Total Metals
2008
Assessment
Richardson Creek (Lake Lee)
13-17-36-(3.5 WS-IV;CA
46.1 FW Acres
13895 Richardson Creek Arm
PARAMETER IR CATEGORY
CRITERIA STATUS
REASON FOR RATING
303D YEAR
Chlorophyll a (40 µg/I, AL, NC) 5
Exceeding Criteria
2016
Richardson Creek (Lake Lee)
13-17-36-(3.5 LWS-IV;CA
63.5 FW Acres
831 96 ILittle Richardson Creek Arm
PARAMETER IR CATEGORY
CRITERIA STATUS REASON FOR RATING
303D YEAR
Chlorophyll a (40 µg/I, AL, NC) 5
Exceeding Criteria
2016
Richardson Creek (Lake Lee)
13-17-36-(3.5 WS-I CV A
19.2 FW Acres
13897 Reservoir downstream of arms and upstream of dam
PARAMETER IR CATEGORY
CRITERIA STATUS REASON FOR RATING
303D YEAR
Water Temperature (329C, AL, LP&CP) 5
Exceeding Criteria
2018
Dissolved Oxygen (4 mg/I, AL, FW) 5
Exceeding Criteria
2018
Chlorophyll a (40 µg/l, AL, NC) 5
Exceeding Criteria
2016
Richardson Creek
13-17-36-(5)a [
8.2 FW Miles
2296 From Monroe Water Supply Dam (Lake Lee) to Mill Creek 13-17-36-10
PARAMETER IR CATEGORY
CRITERIA STATUS REASON FOR RATING
303D YEAR
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) 5
Exceeding Criteria Fair, Poor or Severe Bioclassification 1998
Richardson Creek
____1 13-17-36-(5)a
4.7 FW Miles
12948 From Watson Creek to Salem Creek
PARAMETER IR CATEGORY
CRITERIA STATUS = REASON FOR RATING
303D YEAR
Copper Dissolved Chronic (Calcuated, AL, FW) 5
(Exceeding Criteria [Exceeding Criteria with Statistical
2018
Confidence
6/7/2022 NC 2022 303d List- Approved by EPA 4/30/2022 Page 186 of 192

NORTH CAROLINA 2022 INTEGRATED REPORT
Rocky Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
AU Name AU Number
AU ID Description
South Prong West Branch Rocky River 13-17-3-1 C
2268, From source to West Branch Rocky River
2022 Water Quality Assessments
PARAMETER
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
Little Long Creek 13-17-31-1 C
2269 From source to Long Creek
2022 Water Quality Assessments
PARAMETER
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
Big Bear Creek 13-17-31-5 C
2278 From source to Long Creek
2022 Water Quality Assessments
PARAMETER
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW)
Stony Run 13-17-31-5-5 C
2284 From source to Big Bear Creek
2022 Water Quality Assessments
PARAMETER _
Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW)
Long Creek 13-17-31a C
13192 From source to Little Long Creek
2022 Water Quality Assessments
PARAMETER
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW)
Classification AU LengthArea AU Units
4.6 FW Miles
IR CATEGORY CRITERIA STATUS
3a Data Inconclusive
8.5 FW Miles
IR CATEGORY CRITERIA STATUS
1 Meeting Criteria
19.9 FW Miles
IR CATEGORY CRITERIA STATUS
1 Meeting Criteria
5 Exceeding Criteria
11.9 FW Miles
IR CATEGORY CRITERIA STATUS
1 iMeeting Criteria
24.5 FW Miles
IR CATEGORY CRITERIA STATUS
1 Meeting Criteria
1 LMeeting Criteria
6/7/2022 NC 2022 INTEGRATED REPORT -Category 5 Approved by EPA 4/30/2022 Page 1310 of 1346

NORTH CAROLINA 2022 INTEGRATED REPORT
Rocky Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
AU Name
AU ID Description
Long Creek
13312 From Little Long Creek to Rocky River
2022 Water Quality Assessments
PARAMETER
Water Temperature (329C, AL, LP&CP)
Dissolved Oxygen (4 mg/I, AL, FW)
pH (9.0, AL, FW)
pH (6 su, AL, FW)
Turbidity (50 NTU, AL, FW miles)
Chloride (230 mg/I, AL, FW)
Flouride (1.8 mg/l, AL, FW)
Copper (7 µg/I, AL, FW)
Fecal Coliform (GM 200/400, REC, FW)
Richardson Creek (Lake Lee)
13895 Richardson Creek Arm
2022 Water Quality Assessments
PARAMETER
Chlorophyll a (40 µg/I, AL, NC)
pH (6 su, AL, FW)
Water Temperature (329C, AL, LP&CP)
Dissolved Oxygen (4 mg/I, AL, FW)
pH (9.0, AL, FW)
AU Number Classification AU LengthArea AU Units
13-17-31b C 2.2 FW Miles
IR CATEGORY CRITERIA STATUS
1
Meeting Criteria
1
Meeting Criteria
1
Meeting Criteria
1
Meeting Criteria
1
Meeting Criteria
3a
Data Inconclusive
3a
Data Inconclusive
CExceeding
Criteria
Meeting Criteria
43-17-36-(3.5 WS-IV;CA
I CATEGORY
5
1
3a
3a
3a
46.1 FW Acres
CRITERIA STATUS
Exceeding Criteria
Meeting Criteria
Data Inconclusive
Data Inconclusive
Data Inconclusive
6/7/2022 NC 2022 INTEGRATED REPORT -Category 5 Approved by EPA 4/30/2022 Page 1311 of 1346

u
z
O
"
O
O
u
u
u
O
O
O
to
to
to
z
U
O
O
N
z
U
O
�I
V
O
N
Z
Oo
i a
a
0
O d
O d
O
v
n
O
v
0
a
0
a
0
(u
0
u
p
p
p
p
O
a)
Q
a
a
v
6
a)
Q
LL
z
C
LL
C
LL
C
LL
C
LL
cl
a
x
x
x
x
a d
i a
�p
Ln d
t6
Ul
d d M
�p
Ln a
a a a
v
O
rl
N
V1
M
O
U
a -I
U
ci
U
ci
U
U
cy
M
a
z
O
p
d
O
=
a
c S
cr
N
v
r
O
a
y
M
N
f
z
C Z
O
C
N
C
•--�
CO LL
m
LL
CO
LL
Co
LL
m
LL
d
d
d
d
d
u
a
`^
00
N
O
0
O
w
u
O
m
O
O
O
O
c-I
Ln cfO
a
i--I
0
d
c-I
O
2i
in
O
1
N
�
T
1 d d
d d O
O
1 G 6
6
1 G
d d 6
6
1 G
LL d O d
O
C
V
C
A
C
C
C
n
O
O
O
O
O
v
C�
(U
cc
(D
cr
a)
a)
V z
Z Z
i i i M ei
•i �
V �
V Q
E
Y
O U
A C
2
_
Z
Q a d
_
d LL n
N
i
V
C
7
O
:J
u
O
�
m
O
I 0
M
�
• n
L
c-I
r
I M
L
U
O
u
S U
a
Z
m
f
oO
Q
N
' U
ti
� J
�
' u
�
C
V
w
1 n
tR_
Z
N
d
d d d
O
d
m
�
N
Qo
• V
-a
OD
O1 O
N
I C
O O O
O
S ra
N
a
I N
�
L
I o
v
• �
U
Z
C
�
N
E
OJ
E
O1
E
T
E
tf
-Do
C
N
U
O
U
O
U
a
2
C
K
C
d'
C
VI
C
Z
Q
0
Q.
Z
Q.
z
Q
oo
A
C
C
C
C
7
7
7
7
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
c
c
C a d
d d
o
O
pl
jc
C a
d d
x
x
N
j
G a
a a a a
jc
C a
d d
d a
e
0
A
N
M
O
O
O
C
0
C
Ol
\-i
W
W
V
E
to
L
ci
w
L
ci
w
L
Noo
L
o0
U
O
U
O
U
tV
Z
Z
Z
Z
a)
ti
Ln
oo
O
O
O
O
N
ti
N
N
M
C
C
C
2
C
bf7
1
h0
1
D_h0
1
p
~h0
1
N
N
F
N
O
N
COcL
[O
[O
A
o]
Y
C
C
N
O
O
v
t
U
d
W 01
O
N
4%
00
Ot O
N
4%
CO
m O N
CO
m O
N
J
J
4J
a)
LL
a
u
LL
a
u
LL
a
L
LL
a
Y
�
N
E
�
f0
E
-aE
E
�
O
L
_
N
T
_
N
1 (O
N
L
v
a
U
Q
U
Q
U
a
U

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Michael Ferris
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002-0190
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 2, 2022
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report
Long Creek WWTP
NPDES WW Permit No. NCO024244
Stanly County
Mr. Ferris:
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted a Compliance Evaluation Inspection
(CEI) of the Long Creek WWTP on August 16, 2022. This inspection was conducted to verify
that the facility is operating in compliance with the conditions and limitations specified in NPDES
WW Permit No. NCO024244 and SOC S19-007. The findings and comments noted during this
inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report entitled "Compliance
Inspection Report".
If you should have any questions regarding this inspection, please do not hesitate to contact
Roberto Scheller with the Water Quality Regional Operations Section in the Mooresville Regional
Office at 704-663-1699 or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Docu Signed by:
F161FB69A2D84A3...
Andrew Pitner, Acting Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: Laserfiche
Bryan Hinson (Water/Wastewater Resource Manager): [e-mail]
Brandon Plyler (ORC) email: [e-mail]
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NORTH CARCLINA
o—�m� 919.707.9000

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 1 2 15 I 3 I NCO024244 111 121 22/08/16 I17 18 I r I 19 I G I 201 I
211IIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII I IIIIII IIIIII�1IIII 166
Inspection
Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ---------------------- Reserved -------------------
67
70 LI, J I 71 I tyI 72 I Lni I 73 �I74 79 I I I I I I 180
J
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES Dermit Number)
09:41AM 22/08/16
18/12/01
Long Creek WWTP
1040 Coble Ave Extension
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Albemarle NC 28002
12:26PM 22/08/16
22/02/28
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Michael J Ferris,PO Box 190 Albemarle NC 280020190/City
Manager/704-984-9410/7049849406 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenar Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Progran 0 Sludge Handling Dispo: Facility Site Review Compliance Schedules
Effluent/Receiving Wate 0 Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
DocuSigned by: 8/31/2022
`��DSte^&' DWR/MRO WQ/707-235-2204/
Roberto SchellerEglCM007838943E...
Signature of Man ents@n@ftviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Andrew Pitn r A:d4W H P44tWR/MRO WQ/704-663-1699 Ext.2180/ 9. 2.22
F161FB69A2D84A3..
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
NCO024244 I11 12I 22/08/16 117 18 ICI
(Cont.)
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
The current NPDES Permit #NC0024244 was issued on December 1, 2018 and expired on February
28, 2022. A Permit Renewal application was received by the Division dated September 7, 2021.
Permit is for continue operation and maintainace of a 12.0 MGD wastewater treatment system.
Discharge is via Outfall #001 into Long Creek which is classified as C waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin.
The subject facility is under Special Order by Consent (EMC SOC WQ S19-007) with modified permit
parameters for BOD (Summer/Winter), Ammonia Nitrogen (Summer/Winter), and TSS. Please note
that in accordance with SOC WQ S19-007, Item 2. (d), No later than fifteen (15) calendar days after
any date identified for accomplishment of any activity listed in 2(a), Table of Scheduled Activity, the
City shall submit to the Water Quality Regional Operations Section, Regional Supervisor, written
notice of compliance or noncompliance therewith. Please also note that quarterly progress reports
detailing the work and activities undertaken and completed on the upgrades to the collection system
and WWTP are to be submitted.
Flows for the calendar year 2021 were caculated with a yearly average monthly flow of 4.89 MGD or
40.79% of the 12 MGD permitted flow. Flows for calendar year 2020 were caculated with a yearly
monthly average flow of 6.247 MGD or 52.05% of the 12 MGD permitted flow. The noted reduction of
percent flow may be attritubed to reduced yearly average rainfall during 2021. The average rainfall
for the Albemarle area is reported at 48.3 to 47 inches per year. Total rainfall for 2021 was reported
at 35.67 inches.
Enclosed with this report are copies of 12-month calculated averages for permit parameters. Also
attached are graphs of the 12-month averages for BOD (Inf), BOD (Eff), TSS, NH3 as N, Flow, and
Fecal Coliform. It was noted that effluent BOD and NH3 as N reflect affect of high flows. The influent
BOD graph shows reverse affect of high Flows indicating a reduction in influent BOD by dilution.
Compliance history for the 12-month period, July 2021 through June 2022, was reviewed with the
following reported violations:
08-2021
SP-2021-00
Exceeded Monthly Average - TSS
09-2021
SP-2021-0011
Exceeded Weekly/Monthly Average - TSS
10-2021
SP-2021-0015
Exceeded Weekly/Monthly Average - TSS
11-2021
SP-2022-0001
Exceeded Weekly/Monthly Average - TSS
12-2021
SP-2022-0004
Exceeded Weekly Average - TSS
01-2022
SP-2022-0005
Exceeded Monthly Average - TSS
At time of inspection records and required information appeared to be well kept and readily available
for review.
Page#

Permit: NCO024244 Owner -Facility: Long Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/16/2022 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
■
❑
❑
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The current permmit became effective on December 1, 2018 and expired on February
28, 2022.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified
■
❑
❑
❑
operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility
■
❑
❑
❑
classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: Annual Report on line.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Page# 3

Permit: NCO024244
Inspection Date: 08/16/2022
Owner -Facility: Long Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Compliance Schedules
Yes
No
NA NE
Is there a compliance schedule for this facility?
0
❑
❑ ❑
Is the facility compliant with the permit and conditions for the review period?
❑
❑
0 ❑
Comment: Facility under SOC S19-007.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0
0
❑
❑
❑
degrees Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑
❑
0
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
M
❑
Comment: Contract lab. Environment 1 Inc. and Field Lab Certification #5648.
Bar Screens
Yes
No
NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the unit in good condition?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Grit Removal Yes No NA NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manual ❑
b.Mechanical
Page# 4

Permit: NCO024244 Owner -Facility: Long Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/16/2022 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Grit Removal Yes No NA NE
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes
No
NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0
■
❑
❑
❑
degrees Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
M
❑
❑
❑
Comment: At time of inspection influent sampler was recorded at 2 degrees C.
Pump Station - Influent
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Influent pump station consist of 4 screw lift pumps.
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Page# 5

Permit: NCO024244 Owner - Facility: Long Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/16/2022 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator tested under load?
0
❑
❑
❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑
❑
❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up
0
❑
❑
❑
power?
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Pump Station - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: Second lift station consist of 4 screw lift pumps located at secondary treatment.
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
0
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 6

Permit: NC0024244
Inspection Date: 08/16/2022
Owner -Facility: Long Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Comment:
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary)
Type of operation:
Is the filter media present?
Is the filter surface free of clogging?
Is the filter free of growth?
Is the air scour operational?
Is the scouring acceptable?
Is the clear well free of excessive solids and filter media?
Comment: Effluent trubid.
Disinfection -Gas
Are cylinders secured adequately?
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Yes
No
NA NE
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Cross flow
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 7

Permit: NCO024244
Inspection Date: 08/16/2022
Disinfection -Gas
Owner -Facility: Long Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No.
7782-50-5)?
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
De -chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Comment: Sodium Bisulfite used for dechlorination.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment:
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
Yes
No
NA NE
❑
❑
❑
■
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
1000-0012-3092
Yes No NA NE
Liquid
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
N
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
Yes
No
NA NE
■
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Yes
No
NA NE
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Page# 8

Permit: NCO024244
Inspection Date: 08/16/2022
Owner -Facility: Long Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0
degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
representative)?
Comment: At time of inspection effluent sampler was recorded (a) 5 degrees C.
Solids Handling Equipment
Is the equipment operational?
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
Is storage adequate?
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters?
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press?
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake?
The facility has an approved sludge management plan?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 9

NH3/TRC WLA Calculations
Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP
PermitNo. NC002424
Prepared By: Gary Perlmutter
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 12
Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 1.6
Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 9.5
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)
Daily Maximum Limit (ug/1)
Ammonia (Summer)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
s7Q10 (CFS)
1.6
s7Q10 (CFS)
1.6
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
12
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
12
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
18.6
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
18.6
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
Upstream Bkgd (ug/1)
0
Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
92.08
IWC (%)
92.08
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
18
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
1.1
Ammonia (Winter)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
Fecal Coliform
w7Q10 (CFS)
9.5
Monthly Average Limit:
200/900ml DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
12
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
18.6
(If DF<331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
1.09 Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
66.19
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
2.6
Total Residual Chlorine
1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity
Ammonia (as NH3-N)
1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/I, Monitor Only
2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals); capped at 35 mg/I
3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit (Non-Munis); capped at 35 mg/I
Fecal Coliform
1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals) = Daily Max limit (Non -Muni)

NH3/TRC WLA Calculations
Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP
PermitNo. NC002424
Prepared By: Gary Perlmutter
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 16
Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 1.6
Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 9.5
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)
Daily Maximum Limit (ug/1)
Ammonia (Summer)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
s7Q10 (CFS)
1.6
s7Q10 (CFS)
1.6
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
16
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
16
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
24.8
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
24.8
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
Upstream Bkgd (ug/1)
0
Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
93.94
IWC (%)
93.94
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
18
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
1.1
Ammonia (Winter)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
Fecal Coliform
w7Q10 (CFS)
9.5
Monthly Average Limit:
200/100ml DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
16
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
24.8
(If DF<331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
1.06 Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
72.30
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
2.4
Total Residual Chlorine
1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/l to protect for acute toxicity
Ammonia (as NH3-N)
1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/l, Monitor Only
2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals); capped at 35 mg/I
3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit (Non-Munis); capped at 35 mg/I
Fecal Coliform
1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals) = Daily Max limit (Non -Muni)

Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DATA ENTRY
Table 1. Project Information
Facility Name
WWTP/WTP Class
NPDES Permit
Outfall
Flow, Qw (MGD)
Receiving Stream
HUC Number
Stream Class
❑ Apply WS Hardness WQC
7Q10s (cfs)
7Q10w (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
1Q10s (cfs)
_Effluent Hardness
Upstream Hardness
_Combined Hardness Chronic
Combined__Hardness ZZt 7
_
Data Source(s)
I —I CHECK TO APPLY MODEL
❑ CHECK IF HQW OR ORW WQS
Alebemarle - Long Creek WWTP
Grade IV
NCO024244
001
12.000
Long Creek
03040105
C
1.60
9.50
64.00
1.34
48.32 mg/L (Avg)
73.34 mg/L (Avg)
50_3mg/L
--- 50 mg/L--------
Par01
Par02
Par03
Par04
Par05
Par06111111
Par07
Par08
Par09
Par10
Par11
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Par16
Par17
Parts
Par19
Par20
Par21
Par22
Par23
Par24
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Name w4s Type Chronic ModIer Acute PQL Units
Arsenic
Aquactic Life
C
150
FW
340
ug/L
Arsenic
Human Health
Water Supply
C
10
HH/WS
N/A
ug/L
Beryllium
Aquatic Life
NC
6.5
FW
65
ug/L
Cadmium
Aquatic Life
NC
1.0007
FW
5.9325
ug/L
Chlorides
Aquatic Life
NC
230
FW
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
Water Supply
NC
1
A
ug/L
Total Phenolic Compounds
Aquatic Life
NC
300
A
ug/L
Chromium III
Aquatic Life
NC
208.7367
FW
1596.8345
ug/L
Chromium VI
Aquatic Life
NC
11
FW
16
pg/L
Chromium, Total
Aquatic Life
NC
N/A
FW
N/A
pg/L
Copper
Aquatic Life
NC
14.3233
FW
20.1230
ug/L
Cyanide
Aquatic Life
NC
5
FW
22
10
ug/L
Fluoride
Aquatic Life
NC
1,800
FW
ug/L
Lead
Aquatic Life
NC
6.4289
FW
163.8847
ug/L
Mercury
Aquatic Life
NC
12
FW
0.5
ng/L
Molybdenum
Human Health
NC
2000
HH
ug/L
Nickel
Aquatic Life
NC
67.2682
1 FW
602.5819
pg/L
Nickel
Water Supply
NC
25.0000
WS
N/A
pg/L
Selenium
Aquatic Life
NC
5
FW
56
ug/L
Silver
Aquatic Life
NC
0.06
FW
0.9766
ug/L
Zinc
Aquatic Life
NC
229.1856
FW
226.1755
ug/L
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Human Health
C
0.37
HH
pg/L
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, input
1 /27/2023

H1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
H2
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Effluent Hardness Values" then "COPY• Upstream Hardness Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data . Maximum data
points = 58 points = 58
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
12/5/2018
44.7
44.7
1/10/2019
49.9
49.9
2/7/2019
22.6
22.6
3/12/2019
36.1
36.1
4/4/2019
41.6
41.6
5/7/2019
44.2
44.2
6/6/2019
40
40
7/16/2019
39
39
8/6/2019
35
35
9/10/2019
39
39
12/3/2019
45
45
3/10/2020
56
56
6/2/2020
56
56
9/9/2020
63
63
12/3/2020
46
46
3/4/2021
50
50
6/3/2021
77
77
9/14/2021
64
64
12/7/2021
50
50
3/3/2022
59
59
6/2/2022
58
58
9/13/2022
47
47
Results
Std Dev.
11.8369
Mean
48.3227
C.V.
0.2450
n
22
10th Per value
36.39 mg/L
Average Value
48.32 mg/L
Max. Value
77.00 mg/L
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1 12/4/2018
54.8
54.8
Std Dev.
27.9813
2 3/7/2019
30
30
Mean
73.3412
3 6/4/2019
82
82
C.V.
0.3815
4 7/1/2019
114
114
n
17
5 9/11/2019
101
101
10th Per value
41.60 mg/L
6 12/4/2019
137
137
Average Value
73.34 mg/L
7 3/2/2020
56
56
Max. Value
137.00 mg/L
8 6/1/2020
38
38
9 9/8/2020
61
61
10 12/2/2020
62
62
11 3/3/2021
44
44
12 6/1/2021
67
67
13 9/13/2021
76
76
14 12/2/2021
94
94
15 3/2/2022
67
67
16 6/1/2022
96
96
17 9/12/2022
67
67
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
-2- 1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par01 & Par02
Arsenic
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
8/7/2018
<
2.5
1.25
Std Dev.
2
9/11/2018
<
2.5
1.25
Mean
3
10/2/2018
<
2.5
1.25
C.V.
4
11/29/2018
<
2.5
1.25
n
5
12/5/2018
<
2.5
1.25
6
1/10/2019
<
2.5
1.25
Mult Factor =
7
2/7/2019
2.7
2.7
Max. Value
8
3/12/2019
<
2.5
1.25
Max. Fred Cw
9
6/6/2019
<
2.5
1.25
10
9/10/2019
<
3
1.5
11
12/3/2019
<
3
1.5
12
3/10/2020
<
2
1
13
6/2/2020
<
2
1
14
9/9/2020
<
2
1
15
12/3/2020
<
3
1.5
16
3/4/2021
<
2
1
17
6/3/2021
<
2
1
18
9/14/2021
<
2
1
19
12/7/2021
<
2
1
20
3/3/2022
<
2
1
21
6/2/2022
<
2
1
22
9/13/2022
<
2
1
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Par03
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
1.2364
0.3011
22
1.16
2.7 ug/L
3.1 ug/L
Date Data
1 10/15/2019 <
2 9/15/2020 <
3 6/2/2021 <
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Beryllium
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1 0.5
Std Dev.
0.0000
1 0.5
Mean
0.5000
1 0.5
C.V. (default)
0.6000
n
3
Mult Factor =
3.00
Max. Value
0.50 ug/L
Max. Fred Cw
1.50 ug/L
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
-3- 1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par04
Cadmium
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
8/7/2018
1.2
1.2
Std Dev.
2
9/11/2018
<
1
0.5
Mean
3
10/2/2018
<
1
0.5
C.V.
4
11 /29/2018
<
1
0.5
n
5
12/5/2018
<
1
0.5
6
1/10/2019
1.5
1.5
Mult Factor =
7
2/7/2019
<
1
0.5
Max. Value
8
3/12/2019
<
1
0.5
Max. Fred Cw
9
4/4/2019
<
1
0.5
10
5/7/2019
<
1
0.5
11
6/6/2019
<
1
0.5
12
8/6/2019
<
0.5
0.25
13
9/10/2019
<
0.5
0.25
14
11/5/2019
<
0.5
0.25
15
12/3/2019
<
0.5
0.25
16
1/9/2020
<
0.5
0.25
17
2/4/2020
<
0.5
0.25
18
3/10/2020
<
0.5
0.25
19
4/8/2020
<
0.5
0.25
20
5/5/2020
<
0.5
0.25
21
6/2/2020
<
0.5
0.25
22
7/7/2020
<
0.5
0.25
23
8/6/2020
<
0.5
0.25
24
9/9/2020
<
0.5
0.25
25
10/6/2020
<
0.5
0.25
26
11/5/2020
<
0.5
0.25
27
12/3/2020
<
0.5
0.25
28
1/7/2021
<
0.5
0.25
29
2/4/2021
<
0.5
0.25
30
3/4/2021
<
0.5
0.25
31
4/8/2021
<
0.5
0.25
32
5/5/2021
<
0.5
0.25
33
6/3/2021
<
0.5
0.25
34
7/7/2021
<
0.5
0.25
35
8/3/2021
<
0.5
0.25
36
9/14/2021
<
0.5
0.25
37
10/5/2021
<
0.5
0.25
38
11/3/2021
<
0.5
0.25
39
12/7/2021
<
0.5
0.25
40
1/6/2022
<
0.5
0.25
41
2/2/2022
<
0.5
0.25
42
3/3/2022
<
0.5
0.25
43
4/5/2022
<
0.5
0.25
44
5/4/2022
<
0.5
0.25
45
6/2/2022
<
0.5
0.25
46
7/7/2022
<
0.5
0.25
47
8/4/2022
<
0.5
0.25
48
9/13/2022
<
0.5
0.25
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Pdr05
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
0.3427
0.6883
48
1.06
1.500 ug/L
1.590 ug/L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Chlorides
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
n
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Fred Cw
Use "PASTE SPECIAL -
Values" then "COPY" .
Maximum data points =
58
NO DATA
NO DATA
0
N/A
N/A mg/L
N/A mg/L
-4-
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par06
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
valves" imthenum •copydata
. Max
Par07
Total Phenolic Compounds
points = 58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
Date
Data BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
Std Dev.
NO DATA
1
10/15/2019
< 5 2.5
Std Dev.
2
Mean
NO DATA
2
9/15/2020
< 5 2.5
Mean
3
C.V.
NO DATA
3
6/2/2021
< 20 10
C.V. (default)
4
n
0
4
n
5
5
6
Mult Factor =
N/A
6
Mult Factor =
7
Max. Value
N/A ug/L
7
Max. Value
8
Max. Fred Cw
N/A ug/L
8
Max. Fred Cw
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
49
49
50
50
51
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
56
57
57
58
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
5.0000
0.6000
3
3.00
10.0 ug/L
30.0 ug/L
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
-5- 1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par08
Chromium III
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 Std Dev.
2 Mean
3 C.V.
4 n
5
6 Mult Factor =
7 Max. Value
8 Max. Fred Cw
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Par09
Values" then "COPY" Chromium VI
. Maximum data
points = 58
NO DATA
NO DATA
0
N/A
N/A Ng/L
N/A Ng/L
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
12/5/2018
5.22
5.22
Std Dev.
2
1/10/2019
<
5
2.5
Mean
3
2/7/2019
<
5
2.5
C.V.
4
3/12/2019
<
5
2.5
n
5
4/4/2019
<
5
2.5
6
5/7/2019
<
5
2.5
Mult Factor =
7
6/6/2019
<
5
2.5
Max. Value
8
7/16/2019
<
0.1
0.05
Max. Fred Cw
9
8/6/2019
<
0.1
0.05
10
9/10/2019
<
0.1
0.05
11
10/9/2019
0.176
0.176
12
11 /5/2019
0.177
0.177
13
12/3/2019
0.301
0.301
14
1 /9/2020
<
0.1
0.05
15
2/4/2020
<
0.1
0.05
16
3/10/2020
<
0.1
0.05
17
4/8/2020
<
0.1
0.05
18
5/5/2020
0.292
0.292
19
6/2/2020
<
0.1
0.05
20
7/7/2020
<
0.1
0.05
21
8/6/2020
<
0.1
0.05
22
9/9/2020
0.162
0.162
23
10/6/2020
2
2
24
11 /5/2020
0.491
0.491
25
12/3/2020
<
0.1
0.05
26
1 /7/2021
0.241
0.241
27
2/4/2021
0.242
0.242
28
3/4/2021
<
0.1
0.05
0.896
0.896
F4/8/2021
5/5/20211.37
1.37
6/3/2021
<
0.1
0.05
32
7/7/2021
<
0.1
0.05
33
8/3/2021
<
0.1
0.05
34
9/14/2021
<
0.1
0.05
35
10/5/2021
<
0.1
0.05
36
11 /3/2021
<
0.1
0.05
37
12/7/2021
<
0.1
0.05
38
1 /6/2022
<
0.1
0.05
39
2/2/2022
<
0.1
0.05
40
3/3/2022
<
0.1
0.05
41
4/5/2022
<
0.1
0.05
42
5/4/2022
<
0.1
0.05
43
6/2/2022
<
0.1
0.05
44
7/7/2022
<
0.5
0.25
45
8/4/2022
<
0.1
0.05
46
9/13/2022
<
0.1
0.05
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY'
. Maximum data
points = 58
0.6123
1.8043
46
1.15
5.2 Ng/L
6.0 Ng/L
-6-
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par10
Chromium, Total
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
8/7/2018
7
7
Std Dev.
2
9/11/2018
4.8
4.8
Mean
3
10/2/2018
3
3
C.V. (default)
4
11 /29/2018
7
7
n
5
6
Mult Factor =
7
Max. Value
8
Max. Pred Cw
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Pall
Values" then "COPY" Copper
. Maximum data
points = 58
5.4500
0.6000
4
2.59
7.0 Ng/L
18.1 Ng/L
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
8/7/2018
10
10
Std Dev.
2
9/11/2018
9
9
Mean
3
10/2/2018
8
8
C.V.
4
11/29/2018
25
25
n
5
12/5/2018
17
17
6
1/10/2019
14
14
Mult Factor =
7
2/7/2019
53
53
Max. Value
8
3/12/2019
13
13
Max. Pred Cw
9
4/4/2019
23
23
10
5/7/2019
8.5
8.5
11
6/6/2019
8.7
8.7
12
7/16/2019
9
9
13
8/6/2019
8
8
14
9/10/2019
8
8
15
10/9/2019
< 5
2.5
16
11/5/2019
16
16
17
12/3/2019
11
11
18
1 /9/2020
16
16
19
2/4/2020
12
12
20
3/10/2020
13
13
21
4/8/2020
10
10
22
5/5/2020
7
7
23
6/2/2020
9
9
24
7/7/2020
10
10
25
8/6/2020
33
33
26
9/9/2020
42
42
27
10/6/2020
19
19
28
11/5/2020
30
30
19
19
F12/3/2020
1/7/2021
15
15
2/4/2021
12
12
32
3/4/2021
10
10
33
4/8/2021
11
11
34
5/5/2021
16
16
35
6/3/2021
38
38
36
7/7/2021
31
31
37
8/3/2021
41
41
38
9/14/2021
34
34
39
10/5/2021
49
49
40
11/3/2021
45
45
41
12/7/2021
21
21
42
1/6/2022
27
27
43
2/2/2022
25
25
44
3/3/2022
18
18
45
4/5/2022
15
15
46
5/4/2022
23
23
47
6/2/2022
20
20
48
7/7/2022
35
35
49
8/4/2022
29
29
50
9/13/2022
8
8
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
19.7340
0.6236
50
1.04
53.00 ug/L
55.12 ug/L
-7-
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par12
Cyanide
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
8/7/2018
<
5
5
Std Dev.
2
9/11/2018
<
5
5
Mean
3
10/2/2018
<
5
5
C.V.
4
11 /29/2018
6
5
n
5
12/5/2018
<
5
5
6
1/10/2019
6
5
Mult Factor =
7
2/7/2019
<
5
5
Max. Value
8
3/12/2019
27
27
Max. Fred Cw
9
6/6/2019
<
5
5
10
9/10/2019
<
5
5
11
12/3/2019
<
5
5
12
3/10/2020
<
5
5
13
6/2/2020
<
5
5
14
9/9/2020
<
5
5
15
12/3/2020
<
5
5
16
3/4/2021
<
5
5
17
6/3/2021
<
5
5
18
9/14/2021
<
5
5
19
12/7/2021
<
5
5
20
3/3/2022
<
5
5
21
6/2/2022
<
5
5
22
9/13/2022
<
5
5
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Par13
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
6.00
0.7817
22
1.42
27.0 ug/L
38.3 ug/L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Fluoride
values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
Std Dev.
NO DATA
Mean
NO DATA
C.V.
NO DATA
n
0
Mult Factor =
N/A
Max. Value
N/A ug/L
Max. Fred Cw
N/A ug/L
-8-
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par14
Lead
Date
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
8/7/2018
< 2.5
1.25
Std Dev.
2
9/11/2018
< 2.5
1.25
Mean
3
10/2/2018
< 2.5
1.25
C.V.
4
11/29/2018
< 2.5
1.25
n
5
1/10/2019
< 2.5
1.25
6
2/7/2019
< 2.5
1.25
Mult Factor =
7
3/12/2019
< 2.5
1.25
Max. Value
8
6/6/2019
< 2.5
1.25
Max. Fred Cw
9
9/10/2019
< 2
1
10
12/3/2019
< 2
1
11
3/10/2020
< 2
1
12
6/2/2020
< 2
1
13
9/9/2020
< 2
1
14
12/3/2020
< 2
1
15
3/4/2021
< 2
1
16
6/3/2021
< 2
1
17
9/14/2021
< 2
1
18
12/7/2021
< 2
1
19
3/3/2022
< 2
1
20
6/2/2022
< 2
1
21
9/13/2022
3
3
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Par15
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
1.1905
0.3632
21
1.21
3.000 ug/L
3.630 ug/L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Mercury
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
Std Dev.
NO DATA
Mean
NO DATA
C.V.
NO DATA
n
0
Mult Factor =
N/A
Max. Value
N/A ng/L
Max. Fred Cw
N/A ng/L
-9-
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par16
Molybdenum
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
8/7/2018
<
5
2.5
Std Dev.
2
9/11/2018
<
5
2.5
Mean
3
10/2/2018
100
100
C.V.
4
11 /29/2018
<
10
5
n
5
12/5/2018
<
10
5
6
1/10/2019
<
10
5
Mult Factor =
7
2/7/2019
<
10
5
Max. Value
8
3/12/2019
<
10
5
Max. Fred Cw
9
6/6/2019
<
10
5
10
9/10/2019
<
5
2.5
11
12/3/2019
<
5
2.5
12
3/10/2020
<
5
2.5
13
6/2/2020
<
5
2.5
14
9/9/2020
<
5
2.5
15
12/3/2020
<
5
2.5
16
3/4/2021
<
5
2.5
17
6/3/2021
<
5
2.5
18
9/14/2021
<
5
2.5
19
12/7/2021
<
5
2.5
20
3/3/2022
<
5
2.5
21
6/2/2022
<
5
2.5
22
9/13/2022
<
5
2.5
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Par17 & Pdr18
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
7.6136
2.7143
22
2.09
100.0 ug/L
209.0 ug/L
Date Data
1 8/7/2018
2 9/11/2018
3 10/2/2018 <
4 11 /29/2018
5 1/10/2019
6 2/7/2019
7 3/12/2019
8 6/6/2019 <
9 9/10/2019 <
10 12/3/2019 <
11 3/10/2020
12 6/2/2020 <
13 9/9/2020
14 12/3/2020 <
15 3/4/2021 <
16 6/3/2021
17 9/14/2021
18 12/7/2021
19 3/3/2022 <
20 6/2/2022
21 9/13/2022 <
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Nickel
BDL=1/2DL
Results
4
4
Std Dev.
4
4
Mean
2
1
C.V.
2.5
2.5
n
4.5
4.5
2
2
Mult Factor =
5.3
5.3
Max. Value
2
1
Max. Fred Cw
5
2.5
5
2.5
3
3
2
1
5
5
5
2.5
2
1
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
1
4
4
5
2.5
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
2.9190
0.4944
21
1.28
5.3 Ng/L
6.8 pg/L
-10-
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par19
Date Data
1 8/7/2018 <
2 9/11/2018 <
3 10/2/2018 <
4 11 /29/2018 <
5 1/10/2019 <
6 2/7/2019 <
7 3/12/2019 <
8 6/6/2019 <
9 9/10/2019 <
10 12/3/2019 <
11 3/10/2020 <
12 6/2/2020 <
13 9/9/2020 <
14 12/3/2020 <
15 3/4/2021 <
16 6/3/2021 <
17 9/14/2021 <
18 12/7/2021 <
19 3/3/2022 <
20 6/2/2022 <
21 9/13/2022 <
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Selenium
BDL=1/2DL
Results
5 2.5
Std Dev.
5 2.5
Mean
5 2.5
C.V.
5 2.5
n
5 2.5
5 2.5
Mult Factor =
10 5
Max. Value
5 2.5
Max. Fred Cw
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
3 1.5
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Par20
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
2.0000
0.4183
21
1.24
5.0 ug/L
6.2 ug/L
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Silver Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
8/7/2018
<
2.5
1.25
Std Dev.
0.6672
2
9/11/2018
<
2.5
1.25
Mean
0.9190
3
10/2/2018
<
5
2.5
C.V.
0.7259
4
11/29/2018
<
2.5
1.25
n
21
5
12/5/2018
0.8
0.8
6
3/12/2019
<
5
2.5
Mult Factor =
1.41
7
6/6/2019
<
2.5
1.25
Max. Value
2.500 ug/L
8
7/16/2019
<
1
0.5
Max. Fred Cw
3.525 ug/L
9
9/10/2019
<
1
0.5
10
12/3/2019
<
1
0.5
11
3/10/2020
<
1
0.5
12
6/2/2020
<
1
0.5
13
9/9/2020
<
1
0.5
14
12/3/2020
<
1
0.5
15
3/4/2021
<
1
0.5
16
6/3/2021
<
1
0.5
17
9/14/2021
<
1
0.5
18
12/7/2021
<
1
0.5
19
3/3/2022
<
1
0.5
20
6/2/2022
<
1
0.5
21
9/13/2022
2
2
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
1 /27/2023

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par21
Date
1 8/7/2018
2 9/11/2018
3 10/2/2018
4 11 /29/2018
5 1/10/2019
6 2/7/2019
7 3/12/2019
8 6/6/2019
9 9/10/2019
10 12/3/2019
11 3/10/2020
12 6/2/2020
13 9/9/2020
14 12/3/2020
15 3/4/2021
16 6/3/2021
17 9/14/2021
18 12/7/2021
19 3/3/2022
20 6/2/2022
21 9/13/2022
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL Par22
ZincValues" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
27
27
Std Dev.
51.3851
27
27
Mean
59.6667
17
17
C.V.
0.8612
45
45
n
21
27
27
44
44
Mult Factor =
1.49
25
25
Max. Value
184.0 ug/L
20
20
Max. Fred Cw
274.2 ug/L
24
24
36
36
40
40
23
23
174
174
40
40
30
30
184
184
101
101
69
69
53
53
99
99
148
148
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
Date Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
12/5/2018 <
3.5
1.75
Std Dev.
1.3608
3/12/2019 <
10
5
Mean
1.5469
6/6/2019 <
10
5
C.V.
0.8797
9/10/2019 <
2
1
n
16
12/3/2019 <
2
1
3/10/2020 <
2
1
Mult Factor =
1.69
6/2/2020 <
2
1
Max. Value
5.000000 Ng/L
9/9/2020 <
2
1
Max. Fred Cw
8.450000 Ng/L
12/3/2020 <
2
1
3/4/2021 <
2
1
6/10/2021 <
2
1
9/14/2021 <
2
1
12/7/2021 <
2
1
3/3/2022 <
2
1
6/2/2022 <
2
1
9/13/2022 <
2
1
-12-
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, data
1 /27/2023

Alebemarle - Long Creek WWTP -
NC0024244 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM
Qw (MGD) =
12.0000
1Q10S (cfs) =
1.34
7Q10S (cfs) =
1.60
7Q10W (cfs) =
9.50
30Q2 (cfs) =
NO 30Q2 DATA
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) =
64.00
Receiving Stream: Long Creek HUC 03040105
DATA POINTS = 58
WWTP/WTP Class: Grade IV
IWC% @ 1Q10S =
93.27983952
IWC% @ 7Q10S =
92.07920792
IWC% @ 7Q10W =
66.19217082
IWC% @ 30Q2 =
N/A
IW%C @ QA =
22.51815981
Stream Class:
C
Outfall 001
Qw = 12 MGD
COMBINED HARDNESS (mg/L)
Acute = 50 mg/L
Chronic = 50.3 mg/L
PARAMETER
NC STANDARDS OR EPA CRITERIA
Y)
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE
J
a
z
Applied
Chronic Acute
n # Det. Max Pred Cw Allowable Cw
Standard
Acute (FW): 364.5
Arsenic
C
150 FW(7Q10s) 340
ug L
22 1
3.1
Chronic (FW): 162.9
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable___Cw
Monitoring required
Arsenic
C
10 HH/WS(Qavg)
ug/L
Chronic (HH): 44.4
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 69.68
Beryllium
NC
6.5 FW(7Q10s) 65
ug L
3 0
1.50
Note: n 5 9
C.V. (default)
Chronic: 7.06
No detects; no monitoring required
Limited data set
NO DETECTS
Max MDL = 1
Acute: 6.360
Cadmium
NC
1.0007 FW(7Q10s) 5.9325
ug L
48 2
1.590
Chronic: 1.087
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
2 values > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Chlorides
NC
230 FW(7Q10s)
mg/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:----- 249.8
Acute: NO WQS
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
NC
1 A(30Q2)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:-----IWC?------------------------------
Acute: NO WQS
Total Phenolic Compounds
NC
300 A(30Q2)
ug/L
3 0
30.0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Note: n 5 9
C.V. (default)
Chronic: IWC?
No detects; no monitoring required
Limited data set
NO DETECTS
Max MDL = 20
Acute: 1,711.9
Chromium III
NC
208.7367 FW(7Q10s) 1596.8345
µg/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:----- 226.7
Acute: 17.2
Chromium VI
NC
11 FW(7Q10s) 16
µg/L
46 12
6.0
Chronic: 11.9
No RP , Predicted Max z 50% of Allowable Cw -
No value > Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Tot Cr value(s) > 5 but < Cr VI Allowable Cw
Chromium, Total
NC
µg'L
4 4 18.1 Max reported value = 7
No monitoring required as Reported Max. value is <
Note: n 5 9 C.V. (default)
Cr-VI allowable Cw.
Limited data set
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, rpa
Page 13 of 14 1/27/2023

Alebemarle - Long Creek WWTP - Outfall 001
NCO024244 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators Qw = 12 MGD
Acute: 21.57
Copper
NC
14.3233 FW(7QlOs) 20.1230
ug/L
50 49
55.12
Chronic: 15.56
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
26 values > Allowable Cw
Acute: 23.6
Cyanide
NC
5 FW(7QlOs) 22
10
ug/L
22 3
38.3
Chronic: 5.4
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
1 values > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Fluoride
NC
1800 FW(7QlOs)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic: -----1,954.8--
------------------------
Acute: 175.691
Lead
NC
6.4289 FW(7QIOs) 163.8847
ug/L
21 1
3.630
Chronic: 6.982
No RP , Predicted Max >_ 50% of Allowable Cw -
No value > Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Mercury
NC
12 FW(7QlOs)
0.5
ng/L
0 0
N/A
---
-------------------------
Chronic:----- 13.0
Acute: NO WQS
Molybdenum
NC
2000 HH(7QlOs)
ug/L
22 1
209.0
Chronic: 2,172.0
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
Acute (FW): 646.0
Nickel
NC
67.2682 FW(7QlOs) 602.5819
µg/L
21 12
6.8
Chronic (FW): 73.1
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable Cw ------------------------------
Monitoring required
Nickel
NC
25.0000 WS(7Q10s)
µg/L
Chronic (WS): 27.2
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 60.0
Selenium
NC
5 FW(7QlOs) 56
ug/L
21 0
6.2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 5.4
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No detects; no monitoring required
NO DETECTS
Max MDL =10
Acute: 1.047
Silver
NC
0.06 FW(7QlOs) 0.9766
ug/L
21 2
3.525
Chronic: 0.065
1 detection within past three years - apply quarterly
21 values > Allowable Cw
monitoring.
Acute: 242.5
Zinc
NC
229.1856 FW(7QlOs) 226.1755
ug/L
21 21
274.2
Chronic: 248.9
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
C
0.37 HH(Qavg)
µg/L
16 0
8.45000
Chronic: 1.64312
All nondetects at < 2 ug/I for past 3 yrs - no
NO DETECTS
Max MDL = 10
monitoring required
Acute:
0 0
N/A
Chronic:---------------------------------
24244 Freshwater RPA 12.0 MGD, rpa
Page 14 of 14 1/27/2023

Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DATA ENTRY
Table 1. Project Information
Facility Name
WWTP/WTP Class
NPDES Permit
Outfall
Flow, Qw (MGD)
Receiving Stream
HUC Number
Stream Class
❑ Apply WS Hardness WQC
7Q10s (cfs)
7Q10w (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
1Q10s (cfs)
_Effluent Hardness
Upstream Hardness
_Combined Hardness Chronic
Combined__Hardness ZZt 7
_
Data Source(s)
n CHECK TO APPLY MODEL
❑ CHECK IF HQW OR ORW WQS
Alebemarle - Long Creek WWTP
Grade IV
NCO024244
001
16.000
Long Creek
03040105
C
1.60
9.50
64.00
1.34
48.32 mg/L (Avg)
73.34 mg/L (Avg)
- - - - - - - -
------
49.84mg/L
49.61 mg/L
Par01
Par02
Par03
Par04
Par05
Par06111111
Par07
Par08
Par09
Par10
Par11
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Par16
Par17
Parts
Par19
Par20
Par21
Par22
Par23
Par24
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Name w4s Type Chronic ModIer Acute PQL Units
Arsenic
Aquactic Life
C
150
FW
340
ug/L
Arsenic
Human Health
Water Supply
C
10
HH/WS
N/A
ug/L
Beryllium
Aquatic Life
NC
6.5
FW
65
ug/L
Cadmium
Aquatic Life
NC
0.9937
FW
5.8913
ug/L
Chlorides
Aquatic Life
NC
230
FW
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
Water Supply
NC
1
A
ug/L
Total Phenolic Compounds
Aquatic Life
NC
300
A
ug/L
Chromium III
Aquatic Life
NC
207.1538
FW
1586.3974
ug/L
Chromium VI
Aquatic Life
NC
11
FW
16
pg/L
Chromium, Total
Aquatic Life
NC
N/A
FW
N/A
pg/L
Copper
Aquatic Life
NC
14.2100
FW
19.9718
ug/L
Cyanide
Aquatic Life
NC
5
FW
22
10
ug/L
Fluoride
Aquatic Life
NC
1,800
FW
ug/L
Lead
Aquatic Life
NC
6.3630
FW
162.4349
ug/L
Mercury
Aquatic Life
NC
12
FW
0.5
ng/L
Molybdenum
Human Health
NC
2000
HH
ug/L
Nickel
Aquatic Life
NC
66.7414
1 FW
598.5140
pg/L
Nickel
Water Supply
NC
25.0000
WS
N/A
pg/L
Selenium
Aquatic Life
NC
5
FW
56
ug/L
Silver
Aquatic Life
NC
0.06
FW
0.9632
ug/L
Zinc
Aquatic Life
NC
227.3878
FW
224.6462
ug/L
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Human Health
C
0.37
HH
pg/L
24244 Freshwater RPA 16.0 MGD, input
1 /27/2023

Alebemarle - Long Creek WWTP -
NC0024244 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM
Qw (MGD) =
16.0000
1Q10S (cfs) =
1.34
7Q10S (cfs) =
1.60
7Q10W (cfs) =
9.50
30Q2 (cfs) =
NO 30Q2 DATA
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) =
64.00
Receiving Stream: Long Creek HUC 03040105
DATA POINTS = 58
WWTP/WTP Class: Grade IV
IWC% @ 1Q10S =
94.87375669
IWC% @ 7Q10S =
93.93939394
IWC% @ 7Q10W =
72.303207
IWC% @ 30Q2 =
N/A
IW%C @ QA =
27.92792793
Stream Class:
C
Outfall 001
Qw = 16 MGD
COMBINED HARDNESS (mg/L)
Acute = 49.61 mg/L
Chronic = 49.84 mg/L
PARAMETER
NC STANDARDS OR EPA CRITERIA
Y)
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE
J
a
z
Applied
Chronic Acute
n # Det. Max Pred Cw Allowable Cw
Standard
Acute (FW): 358.4
Arsenic
C
150 FW(7Q10s) 340
ug L
22 1
3.1
Chronic (FW): 159.7
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable___Cw
Monitoring required
Arsenic
C
10 HH/WS(Qavg)
ug/L
Chronic (HH): 35.8
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 68.51
Beryllium
NC
6.5 FW(7Q10s) 65
ug L
3 0
1.50
Note: n 5 9
C.V. (default)
Chronic: 6.92
No detects; no monitoring required
Limited data set
NO DETECTS
Max MDL = 1
Acute: 6.210
Cadmium
NC
0.9937 FW(7Q10s) 5.8913
ug L
48 2
1.590
Chronic: 1.058
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
2 values > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Chlorides
NC
230 FW(7Q10s)
mg/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:----- 244.8
Acute: NO WQS
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
NC
1 A(30Q2)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:-----IWC?------------------------------
Acute: NO WQS
Total Phenolic Compounds
NC
300 A(30Q2)
ug/L
3 0
30.0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Note: n 5 9
C.V. (default)
Chronic: IWC?
No detects; no monitoring required
Limited data set
NO DETECTS
Max MDL = 20
Acute: 1,672.1
Chromium III
NC
207.1538 FW(7Q10s) 1586.3974
µg/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:----- 220.5
Acute: 16.9
Chromium VI
NC
11 FW(7Q10s) 16
µg/L
46 12
6.0
Chronic: 11.7
No RP , Predicted Max z 50% of Allowable Cw -
No value > Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Tot Cr value(s) > 5 but < Cr VI Allowable Cw
Chromium, Total
NC
µg'L
4 4 18.1 Max reported value = 7
No monitoring required as Reported Max value is <
Note: n 5 9 C.V. (default)
Cr-VI allowable Cw.
Limited data set
24244 Freshwater RPA 16.0 MGD, rpa
Page 2 of 3 1/27/2023

Alebemarle - Long Creek WWTP - Outfall 001
NCO024244 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators Qw = 16 MGD
Acute: 21.05
Copper
NC
14.2100 FW(7QlOs) 19.9718
ug/L
50 49
55.12
Chronic: 15.13
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
26 values > Allowable Cw
Acute: 23.2
Cyanide
NC
5 FW(7QlOs) 22
10
ug/L
22 3
38.3
Chronic: 5.3
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
1 values > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Fluoride
NC
1800 FW(7QlOs)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:-----1,916.1 --
-------------------------
Acute: 171.212
Lead
NC
6.3630 FW(7QIOs) 162.4349
ug/L
21 1
3.630
Chronic: 6.773
No RP , Predicted Max >_ 50% of Allowable Cw -
No value > Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Mercury
NC
12 FW(7QlOs)
0.5
ng/L
0 0
N/A
---
-------------------------
Chronic:----- 12.8
Acute: NO WQS
Molybdenum
NC
2000 HH(7QlOs)
ug/L
22 1
209.0
Chronic: 2,129.0
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
Acute (FW): 630.9
Nickel
NC
66.7414 FW(7QlOs) 598.5140
µg/L
21 12
6.8
Chronic (FW): 71.0
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable Cw ------------------------------
Monitoring required
Nickel
NC
25.0000 WS(7Q10s)
µg/L
Chronic (WS): 26.6
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 59.0
Selenium
NC
5 FW(7QlOs) 56
ug/L
21 0
6.2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 5.3
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No detects; no monitoring required
NO DETECTS
Max MDL =10
Acute: 1.015
Silver
NC
0.06 FW(7QlOs) 0.9632
ug/L
21 2
3.525
Chronic: 0.064
1 detection within past three years - apply quarterly
21 values > Allowable Cw
monitoring.
Acute: 236.8
Zinc
NC
227.3878 FW(7QlOs) 224.6462
ug/L
21 21
274.2
Chronic:----- 242.1
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
C
0.37 HH(Qavg)
µg/L
16 0
8.45000
Chronic: 1.32484
All nondetects at < 2 ug/I for past 3 yrs - no
NO DETECTS
Max MDL = 10
monitoring required
Acute:
0 0
N/A
Chronic:---------------------------------
24244 Freshwater RPA 16.0 MGD, rpa
Page 3 of 3 1/27/2023

FACILITY: Alebemarle - Long Creek WWTP Outfall 001
NPDES PERMIT: NCO024244 Dissolved to Total Metal Calculator
In accordance with Federal Regulations, permit limitations must be written as Total Metals per 40 CFR 122.45(c)
PARAMETER
Cadmium (d)
1 Cd -Trout strei
Chromium III (d)(
Chromium VI (d)
Chromium. Total
Lead (d)(h)
Nickel(d)(h)
Ni -WS streams
Silver (d)(h,acut
Zinc (d)(hl
Beryllium
Arsenic (c
Receiving Receiving
Rec. Stream NPDES
Total Suspended
Combined
Combined
Instream
Instream
Effluent
Stream Stream
Solids
Hardness
Hardness
Wastewater
Wastewater
Upstream
Hardness
summer summer 7Q10
1Q10 Flow Limit
-Fixed Value-
chronic
Acute
Concentration
Concentration
Hardness
Average
7Q10 (CFS) (MGD)
[MGD] [MGD]
mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(Chronic)
(Acute)
Average (mg L)
(mg/L)
1.6000 1.0323
0.8645 12.0000
10
50.304
50.004
92. 7792
93.2798
73.341176
48.3227
Upstream Hard Avg (mg/L) = 73.3412
EFF Hard Avg (mg/L) = 48.3227
Dissolved Metals Criteria
US EPA
Total Metal Criteria
Total Metal =
COMMENTS (identify parameters to PERCS Branch to maintain in facility's LTMP/STMP):
after applying hardness
Translators- using
Dissolved Metal
+Translator
equation
Default Partition
ChronicI
Acute
Coefficients
Chronic
Acute
u /I
u /I
streams)
[ug/11
rul
0.251
1.50
0.252
1.001
5.93
42
3231
0.202
208.74
1596.83
11
161
1.000
11.00
16.00
N/A
N/A
5.0
7.0
0.348
14.32
20.12
1.18
30
0.184
6.43
163.88
29
261
0.432
67.27
602.58
25 N/A
0.06
0.98
1.0001
0.061 0.98
66
65
0.2881
229.19 226.18
1.0001 W 6.51 V 65
1.0001 1501 340
(d) = dissolved metal standard. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
(h) = hardness -dependent dissolved metal standard. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
(t) = based upon measurement of total recoveable metal. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
The Human Health standard for Nickel in Water Supply Streams is 25 mg/L which is Total Recoverable metal standard.
The Human Health standard for Arsenic is 10 µg/L which is Total Recoverable metal standard.

FACILITY: Alebemarle - Long Creek WWTP Outfall 001
NPDES PERMIT: NCO024244 Dissolved to Total Metal Calculator
In accordance with Federal Regulations, permit limitations must be written as Total Metals per 40 CFR 122.45(c)
PARAMETER
Cadmium (d)
Cd -Trout stre.
Chromium III (d)(
Chromium VI (d)
Chromium, Total
Lead
Nickel
Ni-W!
Silver
Zinc (c
Beryllium
Arsenic (c
Receiving
Stream
Receiving
Stream
Rec. Stream
NPDES
Total Suspended
Solids
Combined
Hardness
Combined
Hardness
Instream Instream
Wastewater Wastewater
UpstreamHardness
Effluent
summer
summer 7Q10
1Q10
Flow Limit
-Fixed Value-
chronic
Acute
Concentration Concentration
Hardness
Average
7Q10 (CFS)
(MGD)
[MGD]
[MGD]
( mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(Chronic) (Acute)
Average (mg/L)
(mg/L)
1.6000
1.0323
0.8645
16.0000
10
49.839
49.605
93.9394 94.8738
73.341176
48.3227
Upstream Hard Avg (mg/L) = 73.3412
EFF Hard Avg (mg/L) = 48.3227
Dissolved
after applying
e
Metals Criteria
hardness
uation
Acute
u /I
US EPA
Translators- using
Default Partition
Coefficients
streams
Total Metal Criteria Total Metal =
Dissolved Metal, Translator
COMMENTS (identify parameters to PERCS Branch to maintain in facility's LTMP/STMP):
Chronic
Chronic
Acute
u /I
u /I
u /I
0.25
1.49
0.252
0.99
5.89
0.25
0.92
0.99
3.66
42
321
0.202
207.15
1586.40
11
16
1.000
11.00
16.00
N/A
N/A
4.9
6.9
0.348
14.21
19.97
1.17
30
0.184
6.36
162.43
29
259
0.432
66.74
598.51
25
0.06
0.96
1.000
0.061 0.96
65
65
0.288
227.39 224.65
1 nool
6.5
65
1.0001
1501
340
(d) = dissolved metal standard. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
(h) = hardness -dependent dissolved metal standard. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
(t) = based upon measurement of total recoveable metal. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
The Human Health standard for Nickel in Water Supply Streams is 25 mg/L which is Total Recoverable metal standard.
The Human Health standard for Arsenic is 10 µg/L which is Total Recoverable metal standard.

Permit No. NC0024244
NPDES Implementation of Instream Dissolved Metals Standards - Freshwater Standards
The NC 2007-2015 Water Quality Standard (WQS) Triennial Review was approved by the NC
Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on November 13, 2014. The US EPA subsequently
approved the WQS revisions on April 6, 2016, with some exceptions. Therefore, metal limits in draft
permits out to public notice after April 6, 2016 must be calculated to protect the new standards - as
approved.
Table 1. NC Dissolved Metals Water Q ality Standards/A uatic Life Protection
Parameter
Acute FW, µg/1
(Dissolved)
Chronic FW, µg/1
(Dissolved)
Acute SW, µg/l
(Dissolved)
Chronic SW, µg/l
(Dissolved)
Arsenic
340
150
69
36
Beryllium
65
6.5
---
---
Cadmium
Calculation
Calculation
40
8.8
Chromium III
Calculation
Calculation
---
---
Chromium VI
16
11
1100
50
Copper
Calculation
Calculation
4.8
3.1
Lead
Calculation
Calculation
210
8.1
Nickel
Calculation
Calculation
74
8.2
Silver
Calculation
0.06
1.9
0.1
Zinc
Calculation
Calculation
90
81
Table 1 Notes:
1. FW= Freshwater, SW= Saltwater
2. Calculation = Hardness dependent standard
3. Only the aquatic life standards listed above are expressed in dissolved form. Aquatic life
standards for Mercury and selenium are still expressed as Total Recoverable Metals due to
bioaccumulative concerns (as are all human health standards for all metals). It is still necessary
to evaluate total recoverable aquatic life and human health standards listed in 15A NCAC
213.0200 (e.g., arsenic at 10 µg/1 for human health protection; cyanide at 5 µg/L and fluoride at
1.8 mg/L for aquatic life protection).
Table 2. Dissolved Freshwater Standards for Hardness -Dependent Metals
The Water Effects Ratio (WER) is equal to one unless determined otherwise under 15A
NCAC 02B .0211 Subparagraph (11)(d)
Metal
NC Dissolved Standard, µg/I
Cadmium, Acute
WER*{1.136672-[ln hardness](0.041838)} e^{0.9151 [In hardness]-3.1485{
Cadmium, Acute Trout waters
WER*{1.136672-[ln hardness](0.041838)} e^{0.9151[In hardness]-3.6236}
Cadmium, Chronic
WER*{1.101672-[ln hardness](0.041838)} e^{0.7998[ln hardness]-4.4451}
Chromium III, Acute
WER*0.316 e^{0.8190[ln hardness]+3.7256}
Chromium III, Chronic
WER*0.860 e^{0.8190[ln hardness]+0.6848}
Copper, Acute
WER*0.960 e^{0.9422[ln hardness]-1.700}
Copper, Chronic
WER*0.960 e^{0.8545[ln hardness]-1.702}
Lead, Acute
WER*{1.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)} • e^{1.273[ln hardness]-1.4601
Lead, Chronic
WER*{1.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)} • ell {1.273[ln hardness]-4.705}
Nickel, Acute
WER*0.998 e^{0.8460[ln hardness]+2.255}
Nickel, Chronic
WER*0.997 e^{0.8460[ln hardness]+0.0584}
Page 1 of 4

Permit No. NCO024244
Silver, Acute
WER*0.85 • e^{1.72[ln hardness]-6.59)
Silver, Chronic
Not applicable
Zinc, Acute
WER*0.978 e^{0.8473[ln hardness]+0.884)
Zinc, Chronic
WER*0.986 e^{0.8473[ln hardness]+0.884)
General Information on the Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
The RPA process itself did not change as the result of the new metals standards. However, application of
the dissolved and hardness -dependent standards requires additional consideration in order to establish the
numeric standard for each metal of concern of each individual discharge.
The hardness -based standards require some knowledge of the effluent and instream (upstream) hardness
and so must be calculated case -by -case for each discharge.
Metals limits must be expressed as `total recoverable' metals in accordance with 40 CFR 122.45(c). The
discharge -specific standards must be converted to the equivalent total values for use in the RPA
calculations. We will generally rely on default translator values developed for each metal (more on that
below), but it is also possible to consider case -specific translators developed in accordance with
established methodology.
RPA Permitting Guidance/WQBELs for Hardness -Dependent Metals - Freshwater
The RPA is designed to predict the maximum likely effluent concentrations for each metal of concern,
based on recent effluent data, and calculate the allowable effluent concentrations, based on applicable
standards and the critical low -flow values for the receiving stream.
If the maximum predicted value is greater than the maximum allowed value (chronic or acute), the
discharge has reasonable potential to exceed the standard, which warrants a permit limit in most cases. If
monitoring for a particular pollutant indicates that the pollutant is not present (i.e. consistently below
detection level), then the Division may remove the monitoring requirement in the reissued permit.
To perform a RPA on the Freshwater hardness -dependent metals the Permit Writer compiles the
following information:
• Critical low flow of the receiving stream, 7Q 10 (the spreadsheet automatically calculates
the 1 Q 10 using the formula 1 Q 10 = 0.843 (s7Q 10, cfs) 0.993
• Effluent hardness and upstream hardness, site -specific data is preferred
• Permitted flow
• Receiving stream classification
2. In order to establish the numeric standard for each hardness -dependent metal of concern and for
each individual discharge, the Permit Writer must first determine what effluent and instream
(upstream) hardness values to use in the equations.
The permit writer reviews DMR's, Effluent Pollutant Scans, and Toxicity Test results for any
hardness data and contacts the Permittee to see if any additional data is available for instream
hardness values, upstream of the discharge.
If no hardness data is available, the permit writer may choose to do an initial evaluation using a
default hardness of 25 mg/L (CaCO3 or (Ca + Mg)). Minimum and maximum limits on the
hardness value used for water quality calculations are 25 mg/L and 400 mg/L, respectively.
If the use of a default hardness value results in a hardness -dependent metal showing reasonable
potential, the permit writer contacts the Permittee and requests 5 site -specific effluent and
upstream hardness samples over a period of one week. The RPA is rerun using the new data.
Page 2 of 4

Permit No. NCO024244
The overall hardness value used in the water quality calculations is calculated as follows:
Combined Hardness (chronic)
_ (Permitted Flow, cfs *Avg. Effluent Hardness, mg/L)+s7Q10, cfs *Avg. Upstream Hardness, mg2)
(Permitted Flow, cfs + s7Q 10, cfs)
The Combined Hardness for acute is the same but the calculation uses the IQ 10 flow.
3. The permit writer converts the numeric standard for each metal of concern to a total recoverable
metal, using the EPA Default Partition Coefficients (DPCs) or site -specific translators, if any
have been developed using federally approved methodology.
EPA default partition coefficients or the "Fraction Dissolved" converts the value for
dissolved metal at laboratory conditions to total recoverable metal at in -stream
ambient conditions. This factor is calculated using the linear partition coefficients
found in The Metals Translator: Guidance for Calculating a Total Recoverable
Permit Limit from a Dissolved Criterion (EPA 823-B-96-007, June 1996) and the
equation:
Cdiss = 1
Ctotal 1 + { [Kpo] [ss(I+a)] [10-6] }
Where:
ss = in -stream suspended solids concentration [mg/1], minimum of 10 mg/L used,
and
Kpo and a = constants that express the equilibrium relationship between dissolved
and adsorbed forms of metals. A list of constants used for each hardness -dependent
metal can also be found in the RPA program under a sheet labeled DPCs.
4. The numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by the default partition coefficient (or
site -specific translator) to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at ambient conditions.
In some cases, where an EPA default partition coefficient translator does not exist (ie. silver), the
dissolved numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by the EPA conversion factor to
obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at ambient conditions. This method presumes that the metal is
dissolved to the same extent as it was during EPA's criteria development for metals. For more
information on conversion factors see the June, 1996 EPA Translator Guidance Document.
5. The RPA spreadsheet uses a mass balance equation to determine the total allowable concentration
(permit limits) for each pollutant using the following equation:
Ca = (s7Q 10 + Qw)(Cwgs)-s7Q10) (Cb)
Qw
Where: Ca = allowable effluent concentration (µg/L or mg/L)
Cwqs = NC Water Quality Standard or federal criteria (µg/L or mg/L)
Cb = background concentration: assume zero for all toxicants except NH3* (µg/L or mg/L)
Qw = permitted effluent flow (cfs, match s7Q 10)
s7Q 10 = summer low flow used to protect aquatic life from chronic toxicity and human
health through the consumption of water, fish, and shellfish from noncarcinogens (cfs)
* Discussions are on -going with EPA on how best to address background concentrations
Flows other than s7Q 10 may be incorporated as applicable:
IQ 10 = used in the equation to protect aquatic life from acute toxicity
Page 3 of 4

Permit No. NC0024244
QA = used in the equation to protect human health through the consumption of water,
fish, and shellfish from carcinogens
30Q2 = used in the equation to protect aesthetic quality
6. The permit writer enters the most recent 2-3 years of effluent data for each pollutant of concern.
Data entered must have been taken within four and one-half years prior to the date of the permit
application (40 CFR 122.21). The RPA spreadsheet estimates the 95th percentile upper
concentration of each pollutant. The Predicted Max concentrations are compared to the Total
allowable concentrations to determine if a permit limit is necessary. If the predicted max exceeds
the acute or chronic Total allowable concentrations, the discharge is considered to show
reasonable potential to violate the water quality standard, and a permit limit (Total allowable
concentration) is included in the permit in accordance with the U.S. EPA Technical Support
Document for Water Quality -Based Toxics Control published in 1991.
7. When appropriate, permit writers develop facility specific compliance schedules in accordance
with the EPA Headquarters Memo dated May 10, 2007 from James Hanlon to Alexis Strauss on
40 CFR 122.47 Compliance Schedule Requirements.
The Total Chromium NC WQS was removed and replaced with trivalent chromium and
hexavalent chromium Water Quality Standards. As a cost savings measure, total chromium data
results may be used as a conservative surrogate in cases where there are no analytical results
based on chromium III or VI. In these cases, the projected maximum concentration (95th %) for
total chromium will be compared against water quality standards for chromium III and
chromium VI.
9. Effluent hardness sampling and instream hardness sampling, upstream of the discharge, are
inserted into all permits with facilities monitoring for hardness -dependent metals to ensure the
accuracy of the permit limits and to build a more robust hardness dataset.
10. Hardness and flow values used in the Reasonable Potential Analysis for this permit included:
Parameter
Value
Comments (Data Source)
Average Effluent Hardness, mg/L
48.3
Permittee submitted DMRs
(Total as CaCO3)
Average Upstream Hardness, mg/L
73.3
Permittee submitted DMRs
(Total as CaCO3)
7Q10 summer (cfs)
1.6
Reported in previous permit Fact
Sheet
1Q10 (cfs)
1.34
Calculated in RPA spreadsheet
Permitted Flow (MGD)
12.0
Design flow
Date: November 1, 2022
Permit Writer: Gary Perlmutter
Page 4 of 4

1/27/23 WQS = 12 ng/L MERCURY WQBEL/TBEL EVALUATION V:2013-6
Facility Name Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP / NC0024244 FALSE
/Permit No.
MMP Required
Total Mercury 1631E PQL = 0.5 ng/L 7Q10s = 1.600 cfs WQBEL = 13.03 ng/L
Date Modifier Data Entry Value Permitted Flow = 12.000 47 ng/L
8/7/18
23.8
23.8
9/11/18
11.6
11.6
9/25/18
1.3
1.3
10/2/18
1.8
1.8
11/29/18
3.8
3.8
12/5/18
9.6
9.6
8.7
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2018
1/10/19
18.3
18.3
2/7/19 <
1
0.5
3/12/19 <
1
0.5
6/6/19
7.21
7.21
9/10/19
1.7
1.7
12/3/19
4.7
4.7
5.5
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2019
3/10/20
10
10
6/2/20
4.1
4.1
9/9/20
13.8
13.8
12/3/20
9.5
9.5
9.4
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2020
3/4/21
6.1
6.1
6/3/21
13.1
13.1
9/14/21
5.3
5.3
12/7/21 <
1
0.5
6.3
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2021
3/3/22
10.5
10.5
6/2/22
5.6
5.6
9/13/22
28.4
28.4
WQBEL< 14.8
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2022

1/27/23 WQS = 12 ng/L MERCURY WQBEL/TBEL EVALUATION V:2013-6
Facility Name Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP / NC0024244 FALSE
/Permit No.
MMP Required
Total Mercury 1631E PQL = 0.5 ng/L 7Q10s = 1.600 cfs WQBEL = 12.77 ng/L
Date Modifier Data Entry Value Permitted Flow = 16.000 47 ng/L
8/7/18
23.8
23.8
9/11/18
11.6
11.6
9/25/18
1.3
1.3
10/2/18
1.8
1.8
11/29/18
3.8
3.8
12/5/18
9.6
9.6
8.7
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2018
1/10/19
18.3
18.3
2/7/19 <
1
0.5
3/12/19 <
1
0.5
6/6/19
7.21
7.21
9/10/19
1.7
1.7
12/3/19
4.7
4.7
5.5
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2019
3/10/20
10
10
6/2/20
4.1
4.1
9/9/20
13.8
13.8
12/3/20
9.5
9.5
9.4
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2020
3/4/21
6.1
6.1
6/3/21
13.1
13.1
9/14/21
5.3
5.3
12/7/21 <
1
0.5
6.3
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2021
3/3/22
10.5
10.5
6/2/22
5.6
5.6
9/13/22
28.4
28.4
WQBEL< 14.8
ng/L
- Annual Average for 2022

December 13, 2022
Gary Perlmutter, M.Sc.
Environmental Specialist II, Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone] 1 Cell: [phone]
[e-mail]
NPDES PERMIT#NC0024244
City of Albemarle NC WWTP
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR RENEWAL
Chemical Addendum and Supplemental Datasheets
Mr. Perlmutter,
In previous correspondence concerning the completeness of the City of Albemarle's NPDES permit
renewal, it was pointed out that the application was short a process narrative to describe the process
flow diagram, and it lacked the Chemical Addendum and Supplemental Datasheet for emerging
pollutants from Industrial Users.
The division was been previously sent process narrative and was accepted.
The Industrial Users in Albemarle include;
• The City of Albemarle Landfill Leachate,
• Auria Corporation, Car Parts
• Creative Dyeing, Textile Coloring
Here we submit the Chemical Addendum and Supplemental Datasheets requested. The two Industrial
users were queried for the types of compounds they use in their processes and they responded with all
of the MSDS sheets of the chemicals they use in their processes. Many of the sheets describe dyes and
resins and ph adjusting compounds mixed with other components. Most of the MSDS sheets describe
the principal characteristics of the material with respect to safety but do not list whether they include
any of the PFAS compounds in the list or illude to any analytical method for testing the material. Here in
we submit the MSDS sheets as reference to these compounds
The City of Albemarle land fill (the third industry) leachate was sampled on 11/18/2022 by Environment
1 and forwarded the samples to Enthalpy Analytical in Wilmington, NC for analyzing the PFAS
compounds and 1,4 Dioxane. Enthalpy Analytical did not use method EPA 12633 for testing but rather
used EU-047 PFAS by Isotope Dilution for non -potable water method. A full description of their
technique is included herein. The value of the PFAS compounds measured are included in a spreadsheet
format titled, ALBEMARLE Chem Addendum - Supplemental Datasheet.xlsx since the method is not
approved.

The single Dioxane test is presented on the file Albemarle Chemical-Addendum-to-NPDES-
application.xlsx. The average daily flow from the landfill over the last three years was 31,591 gallons per
day.
Than ou
Brandon W. Plyler
City of Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Treatment Plant Supervisor
ATTACHMENTS
ALBEMARLE Chem Addendum - Supplemental Datasheet.xlsx
Albemarle Chemical-Addendum-to-NPDES-application.xlsx.
CHEMICALS USED AND TEST RESULTS.zip
Cc; Barry King PE #33270, Principal Engineer, SK Environment & Engineering PLLC

EPA Identification Number NPDES Number Facility Name Outfall Number
NC0024244 City of Albemarle W WTP 1
Method Number Estimated Concentration (If
Pollutant (Required) CAS number (if Applicable) Reason Pollutant Believed Present in Discharge Known)
1,4 Dioxane 123-91-1 EPA 624.1 Pollutant measured in Land Fill Leachate as shown 35.3 ug/L

City of Albemarle NPDES NCO024244
Sample Results from City Of Albemarle Landfill Leachate Discharge 18-Nov-22 Effluent Grab (ng/L)
CAS Number
Analyte Name
Acronym
NOTE
113507-82-7
Perfluoro(2-ethoxyethane)sulphonic acid
PFEESA
<LOD (1.20) U
U
13252-13-6
Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid
HFPO-DA
<LOD(1.14)U
U
151772-58-6
Perfluoro-3,6-dioxaheptanoic acid
NFDHA
<LOD(1.20)U
U
1691-99-2
N-Ethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)perfluorooctylsulphonamide
N-EtFOSE
<LOD (36.0) U
U
1763-23-1
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
PFOS
667
2058-94-8
Perfluoroundecanoic acid
PFUnA
1.52
J
2355-31-9
2-(N-Methylperfluorooctanesulfonamido) acetic acid
N-McFOSAA
280
24448-09-7
1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-N-(2-
hydroxyethyl)-N-methyloctane-l-sulfonamide
N-McFOSE
<LOD (36.0) U
U
2706-90-3
Perfluoropentanoic acid
PFPeA
851
2706-91-4
Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid
PFPeS
60.9
27619-97-2
1-Octanesulfonic acid, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-
tridecafluoro-
6:2 FTS
103
2991-50-6
2-(N-Ethylperfluorooctanesulfonamido) acetic acid
N-EtFOSAA
41.8
307-24-4
Perfluorohexanoic acid
PFHxA
1280
307-55-1
Perfluorododecanoic acid
PFDoA
<LOD (1.01) U
U
31506-32-8
Heptadecafluoro-N-methyloctane-l-sulphonamide
N-McFOSA
<LOD (1.20) U
U
335-67-1
Perfluorooctanoic acid
PFOA
1060
335-76-2
Perfluorodecanoic acid
PFDA
30.9
335-77-3
Perfluorodecanesulfonic acid
PFDS
<LOD (0.960) U
U
355-46-4
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
PFHxS
209
356-02-5
3-Perfluoropropyl Propanoic Acid
3:3 FTCA
67.3
375-22-4
Perfluorobutanoic acid
PFBA
588
375-73-5
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
PFBS
185
375-85-9
Perfluoroheptanoic acid
PFHpA
410
375-92-8
Perfluoroheptanesulfonic acid
PFHpS
14.7
375-95-1
Perfluorononanoic acid
PFNA
59.3
376-06-7
Perfluorotetradecanoic acid
PFTeA
<LOD(1.09)U
U
377-73-1
Perfluoro-3-methoxypropanoic acid
PFMOPrA
<LOD(1.20)U
U
39108-34-4
3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,10-
Heptadecafluorodecanesulphonic acid
8:2 FTS
6.91
4151-50-2
Sulfluramid
N-EtFOSA
<LOD (1.20) U
U
68259-12-1
Perfluorononanesulfonic acid
PFNS
<LOD (0.432) U
U
72629-94-8
Perfluorotridecanoic acid
PFTriA
<LOD (0.755) U
U
754-91-6
Perfluorooctanesulfonamide
PFOSA
13.2
756426-58-1
Perfluoro(2-((6-chlorohexyl)oxy)ethanesulfonic acid)
9CI-PF30NS
<LOD (0.600) U
U
757124-72-4
1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluorohexanesulphonic acid
4:2 FTS
2.2
J
763051-92-9
2-(8-chloro-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8-
hexadecafluorooctoxy)-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethanesulfonic
acid
11CI-PF3OUdS
<LOD (0.600) U
U
79780-39-5
Perfluorododecanesulfonic acid
PFDoS
<LOD (11.2) U
U
812-70-4
2H,2H,3H,3H-Perfluorodecanoic acid
7:3 FTCA
69.9
863090-89-5
Perfluoro-4-methoxybutanoicAcid
PFMOBA
<LOD (7.20) U
U
914637-49-3
2H,2H,3H,3H-Perfluorooctanoic Acid
5:3 FTCA
3040
919005-14-4
4,8-Dioxa-3H-perfluorononanoic acid
ADONA
<LOD (0.600) U
U
NO - Indicates a non -detect.
U - The analyte was not detected. The Estimated Detection Limit (EDL) may be reported for this analyte.
J - Indicates that an analyte has a concentration below the reporting limit (lowest point of the calibration curve).

Industrial User: AURIA SAFETY DATA SHEETS
Product Name
PFAS present
2-1-3144-E
not specified
2-J-3234-C
not specified
10-1-3025-13
possible
14-J-3568-D
not specified
Industrial User: Creative Dveine
Product Name
Document type
LUMACRON RUBINE XLD
SDS
VIRCO SOIL RID
SDS
ACETIC ACID SOLUTION
SDS
ALBAFLUID®C
SDS
BARBALUBE® FL-62
Tech Bull.
CAUSTIC SODA 25%-50%
SDS
CEKAPENE NON
Tech Bull.
CITRIC ACID
SDS
Dianix Red AM -SLR
SDS
Dianix Yellow AM -SLR 200%
SDS
Eganal PS liq
SDS
Foron Navy S-RD SDS
Foron Orange SE-RD
SDS
Foron Red S-WF
SDS
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE 50%
SDS
INTRATEX CA2 NEW
Tech Bull.
INVADINE® DA-01
SDS
Procion® Brilliant Red H-EGXL
SDS
Procion Crimson H-EXL
SDS
Procion Yellow H-EXL
SDS
Sanitized TH 27-24
SDS
UVITEX® BH-B LIQ.
SDS
UVITEX® BHT -AM LIQ.
SDS
UVITEX® BH-V LIQ.
SDS
Sera Wash M-VFN
SDS
SODA ASH LIGHT
SDS
SODIUM ACETATE
SDS
SODIUM HYDROSULFITE 90%
SDS
SODIUM METABISULFITE
SDS
SODIUM SULFATE
SDS
SODIUM THIOSULFATE
SDS
Solegal Cold WF liq
SDS
SOLV-IT
Tech Bull.
Sora Quest CM -MI
SDS
Sora Sperse PC -CA
SDS
ULTRAPHIL®TG
SDS
VIRCO SOIL RID
Tech Bull.
VIRCOLON SPECIAL #2
Tech Bull.
Hazardous Chemical Notes
none listed No chemical information provided
none listed No chemical information provided
Antimony compound Described as synthetic polymer compound
none listed No chemical information provided
PFAS present
Hazardous Chemical
Notes
methyl N-[3-(acetylamino)-4-[(4-
n itro phe nyl)azo] p henyl]-N-(3-methoxy-3-
not likely
oxopropyl)-p alaninate
Described as dyestuff mixture
possible
Described as nonionic hydrophilic polymer dispersion
NO
not specified
Described as mixture
not specified
Described as DYEBATH LUBRICANT FOR SYNTHETIC AND NATURAL FI
NO
possible
Described as Nonionic surfactant blend
NO
not specified
Described as textile dye
not specified
Described as textile dye
not specified
Described as Aqueous solution of a linear polycondensate
N-[2-[(2-b ro mo-4,6-di nitrophenyl )azo]-5-
not specified
(diethylamino)phenyl]acetamide
Described as Disperse Dyes
2-phthalimidoethyl N-[4-(2-cyano-4-
n itro phe nylazo) phe nyl]-N-methyl-Q-
not specified
alaninate
Described as azo dyestuff
not specified
Sodium sulphate
Described as azo dyestuff
NO
Described as COMPATIBILIZER AND ANTI -PRECIPITANT
not specified
not specified
five listed chemicals, none PFAS
not specified
Described as textile dye
not specified
Described as textile dye
not specified
Described as azo reactive dyestuff,
not likely
Zinc pyridinethione
Described as antimicrobic
not likely
urea
not likely
urea
not likely
sodium hydroxide
not specified
2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol
NO
Sodium Carbonate
NO
NO
Sodium dithionite
NO
Described as Sulfite Salt
NO
Described as Sulfate Salt
NO
Sodium thiosulfate, pentahydrate
Described as Thiosulfate Salt
not likely
Described as benzophenone derivativeanionic
not specified
Described as MULTIFUNCTIONAL DYEING ASSISTANT
not likely
Phosphoric acid, sodium hydroxide
not specified
not specified
2-methyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one
not specified
Described as NONIONIC LIQUID
not specified
Described as LOW FOAMING MACHINE CLEANER