20220973 Ver 1_RE External UNCCH - Business School Addition - stream impact revisions for your feedback_20220721

Baker, Caroline D
From: Homewood, Sue
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 2:53 PM
To: Maynor-Brady, Tari Kim
Cc: Myers, Sharon A; Brian Tiede; Cohn, Colleen M
Subject: RE: [External] UNCCH - Business School Addition - stream impact revisions for your
feedback
Good afternoon Tari,
Colleen and I were able to review the updated plans which show substantial avoidance and minimization. Thank you for
those efforts. We believe that your plans are in line with the avoidance and minimization requirements of the 404, 401
and the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules.
We have determined that the current design would be able to be authorized as an allowable use (requires a written
Buffer Authorization from DWR) rather than the more complicated Buffer Variance process. The is pursuant to Session
Law 2013-395 Section 2 . Moving forward with this project you can submit the Buffer Authorization request as part of
the PCN with the 404/401 and Colleen in our Raleigh Regional Office will review it once submitted. She can loop me
back in as/if needed.
Thank you all for your efforts to work through this process to ensure a much simpler approval process.
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
From: Maynor-Brady, Tari Kim <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:36 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Cc: Myers, Sharon A <[e-mail]>; Brian Tiede <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] UNCCH - Business School Addition - stream impact revisions for your feedback
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Good Morning Sue and Colleen —

Thank you again for meeting us on zoom on the 18t" with regards to the UNC CH Business School Addition. The design
team has been reworking the design to minimize the impacts to the stream since we met. We believe that we're
headed in a better direction now, but would like your input:
• The design you saw on the 18t" is attached in the "previous stream impacts" pdf.
• A PDF showing the impacts of the redesign is also attached.
We're still working through how the stream ends as it meets the building (the perspective is also attached), but
the proposed constructed wetland is now outside of the buffers. We'd propose enhancing the existing plantings
in zone 1 and 2.
Do you think this will be a more acceptable direction when applying for the major variance? I'd be happy to set up a
zoom meeting if that would be helpful.
Thanks,
Tari Maynor-Brady, AIA
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Architect, Facilities Planning & Design
Giles F. Horney Building
103 Airport Drive- Suite 220
Campus Box #1090
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-1090
T 919.962.7019
C 336.706.9708
[e-mail]
www.facilities.unc.edu/planning