HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0023884_Inspection_20230124ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Sonja Basinger
City of Salisbury
1915 Grubb Ferry Road
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
January 24, 2023
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
City of Salisbury
NPDES Permit No. NC0023884
Rowan County
Dear Ms. Basinger:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Report for the inspection of the City of Salisbury's
approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on January 19, 2023, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Please inform the City's
Pretreatment Coordinator of our findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell
at (704) 235-2192 or at wes.bell@ncdenr.gov.
Enclosure: Inspection Report
Cc: NPDES Program Files - Laserfiche
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
AwHP►
F161 FB69A2D84A3...
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue. Suite 301 1 Mooresville. North Carolina 28115
704.663.1699
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Salisbury
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Sonja Basinger, Jeff Greer
3. Title(s): Environmental Services Manager, Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 8/9/21 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
ICIS CODING
Main Program Permit Number
NC0023884
MM/DD/YY
01/19/23
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
6
8. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
12. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
13. Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule?
0
14. Number of SIUs on Schedules?
0
15. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
2
16. Number of CIUs in SNC?
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for
SNC for
Not Pul
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
L YES ❑ NO; BOD weekly
average violation (September
2022) and fecal coliform weekly
average violation (November
2022).
L YES ❑ NO
See Comments Section
Limits: None
Reporting: None
)lished: N/A
N/A
❑ YES // NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? EYES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
❑ NO
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 1
28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW
Program Element
Last Submittal Received
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
9/20/22
Yes ❑ No
2/22/18
r Yes ❑ No
In Review
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
9/17/19
/1 Yes ❑ No
12/10/19
r Yes ❑ No
10/1/24
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
1/3/13
/1 Yes ❑ No
1/10/13
r Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
5/6/13
/1 Yes ❑ No
6/17/13
/1 Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
4/11/22
/1 Yes ❑ No
6/22/22
/1 Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW
29. User Name 1.Teijin Automotive Technologies 2. IPC
3. Hexagon Agility
30. IUP Number
0036
0038
0039
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
/1 Yes ❑ NoJ
/1 Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
9/29/24
9/30/27
12/31/27
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
N/A
N/A
433.17
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
_1
A Yes ❑ No
i1 Yes ❑ No
A Yes ❑ No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
/1 Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
1 Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. A Yes ■ No
b. •Yes ■ No
a. ►N Yes ■ No
b. •Yes ■ No
a. A Yes ■ No
b. •Yes ■ No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
❑ Yes ❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. A Yes ■ No
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a. ►N Yes ■ No
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a. A Yes ■ No
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
/1 Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
1 Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
A Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
A Yes ❑ No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
® Yes ❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
❑YesNNoDN/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No EN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
►NYes ■No■NA
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
NYes ❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
h.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes /1 No
❑ Yes L No
❑ Yes /1 No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
NYes ❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
NYes ❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
NYes ❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes /1 No
❑ Yes r No
❑ Yes I No
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form
Updated December 2016 Page 2
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
18. The POTW investigated an odor complaint at the IPC facility in July 2022. The POTW determined that IPC's chemical feed pump system
used to reduce/eliminate the odors was not operating properly. IPC implemented corrective actions including the usage of a hydrogen peroxide
chemical feed system to reduce/eliminate the odors. The POTW had also investigated a previous odor complaint at the IPC facility in February
2021. As a result of the July 2022 investigation, the POTW issued a NOV and civil penalty assessment to IPC.
22. The POTW's on -site certified laboratory performs LTMP analyses on conventional parameters and pH and temperature. Pace Analytical
Services has been contracted to perform the remaining LTMP analyses.
35. POTW performed SIU inspections on Teijin Automotive Technologies (6/29/22), IPC (9/8/22) and Hexagon Agility (5/6/22).
39. The POTW's on -site certified laboratory performs analyses on conventional parameters and pH and temperature for SIU sampling events.
Pace Analytical Services has been contracted to perform the remaining IUP analyses.
41a. Teijin Automotive Technologies and IPC both contract Statesville Analytical to perform IUP analyses. Hexagon Agility contracts Pace
Analytical Services to perform IUP analyses.
46. The POTW issued NOVs to Teijin Automotive Technologies for BOD, COD, ammonia, TSS and zinc limit violations in September 2022
and a flow limit violation in November 2022. Teijin Automotive Technologies was also issued a NOV for the late reporting of the September
2022 flow monitoring report. The POTW will assess a civil penalty (based on point system) to Teijin Automotive Technologies for all the
above -noted violations.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
The records reviewed during the inspection were organized and well maintained. The POTW's Industrial Pretreatment Program was being
properly implemented.
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ®NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY:
DocuSigned by:
DATE: 1/20/2023
Ab1b96U9OCC343/...
Wes Bell, Sr. Environmental Specialist, WQROS/MRO, DWR
DocuSigned by:
44 4cw H P;.u.e4
F161 FB69A2D84A3...
PCI REVIEWED BY: DATE:
Andrew H. Pitner, Acting Regional Supervisor, WQROS/MRO, DWR
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 3